Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'hindi/news-clippings/govt-to-make-honour-killing-distinct-offence-by-dhananjay-mahapatra-1235/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/hindi/news-clippings/govt-to-make-honour-killing-distinct-offence-by-dhananjay-mahapatra-1235/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'hindi/news-clippings/govt-to-make-honour-killing-distinct-offence-by-dhananjay-mahapatra-1235/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/hindi/news-clippings/govt-to-make-honour-killing-distinct-offence-by-dhananjay-mahapatra-1235/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6e66728c97-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6e66728c97-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f6e66728c97-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6e66728c97-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6e66728c97-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6e66728c97-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6e66728c97-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f6e66728c97-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f6e66728c97-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 42114,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Govt to make honour killing distinct offence by Dhananjay Mahapatra&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Rattled by the spate of honour killings in northern states, the UPA government is preparing a legislative route to amend Indian Penal Code (IPC) and provide a deterrent punishment against khap panchayats, which order death penalty to young couples who marry defying caste barrier. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;We are seriously considering amending Indian Penal Code to make honour killing a separate and distinct offence and provide deterrent punishment,&amp;quot; a top home ministry source told TOI. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The preparation to draft a bill to amend IPC to make honour killings distinct from ordinary murders by widening its definition under Section 302 gained speed after attorney general G E Vahanvati recently gave an opinion answering in the affirmative the home ministry&#039;s query `whether legislative intervention was necessary to make honour killings a specific offence&#039;. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Honour killings, mostly reported from Haryana, western Uttar Pradesh, Punjab, rural Delhi and some areas in southern India, had evoked sharp reaction from home minister P Chidambaram. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;In Rajya Sabha, Chidambaram had said on July 28 last year, &amp;quot;We deplore honour killings. We do not recognise the right of caste panchayats to take upon itself to pronounce whether a man or a woman should live together or a woman has committed an act, which, allegedly bring dishonour to the family or community. That is not the function of caste panchayat. No caste panchayat has a right to pronounce upon the conduct of individuals.&amp;quot; &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;While considering an amendment to IPC, the legal brains would take into account various facts -- whether it is possible to treat leaders of khap panchayat, if not all participants, not as accomplices or abettors but as main conspirators in the honour killing and whether to punish those who justify such brutal murders as in the case of the banned custom of sati. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Another suggestion receiving attention of the home ministry is whether to put the burden of proof on the accused in honour killing cases since these crimes often remain closely guarded family secrets making it difficult for the police to get witnesses. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The push for the possible amendment of IPC to make honour killings a separate offence and make it distinct and wider from ordinary murder came from the Punjab and Haryana High Court, which in the recent past had been flooded with applications from young couples seeking protection from caste panchayats and caste-blinded relatives. The HC had said it was time that society protected such harassed couples. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;According to the principles followed by khap panchayats, there could be no marriage alliance between a man and a woman if they were of same gotra or belonged to different castes. Even if they had same caste and differentgotras, they still cannot marry if they resided in the same or adjoining villages. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;H&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 82,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;govt-to-make-honour-killing-distinct-offence-by-dhananjay-mahapatra-1235&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 1235,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 42114,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;न्यूज क्लिपिंग्स् | Govt to make honour killing distinct offence by Dhananjay Mahapatra&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
Rattled by the spate of honour killings in northern states, the UPA government is preparing a legislative route to amend Indian Penal Code (IPC) and provide a deterrent punishment against khap panchayats, which order death penalty to young couples who...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font &gt;Rattled by the spate of honour killings in northern states, the UPA government is preparing a legislative route to amend Indian Penal Code (IPC) and provide a deterrent punishment against khap panchayats, which order death penalty to young couples who marry defying caste barrier. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font &gt;&amp;quot;We are seriously considering amending Indian Penal Code to make honour killing a separate and distinct offence and provide deterrent punishment,&amp;quot; a top home ministry source told TOI. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font &gt;The preparation to draft a bill to amend IPC to make honour killings distinct from ordinary murders by widening its definition under Section 302 gained speed after attorney general G E Vahanvati recently gave an opinion answering in the affirmative the home ministry&#039;s query `whether legislative intervention was necessary to make honour killings a specific offence&#039;. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font &gt;Honour killings, mostly reported from Haryana, western Uttar Pradesh, Punjab, rural Delhi and some areas in southern India, had evoked sharp reaction from home minister P Chidambaram. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font &gt;In Rajya Sabha, Chidambaram had said on July 28 last year, &amp;quot;We deplore honour killings. We do not recognise the right of caste panchayats to take upon itself to pronounce whether a man or a woman should live together or a woman has committed an act, which, allegedly bring dishonour to the family or community. That is not the function of caste panchayat. No caste panchayat has a right to pronounce upon the conduct of individuals.&amp;quot; &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font &gt;While considering an amendment to IPC, the legal brains would take into account various facts -- whether it is possible to treat leaders of khap panchayat, if not all participants, not as accomplices or abettors but as main conspirators in the honour killing and whether to punish those who justify such brutal murders as in the case of the banned custom of sati. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font &gt;Another suggestion receiving attention of the home ministry is whether to put the burden of proof on the accused in honour killing cases since these crimes often remain closely guarded family secrets making it difficult for the police to get witnesses. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font &gt;The push for the possible amendment of IPC to make honour killings a separate offence and make it distinct and wider from ordinary murder came from the Punjab and Haryana High Court, which in the recent past had been flooded with applications from young couples seeking protection from caste panchayats and caste-blinded relatives. The HC had said it was time that society protected such harassed couples. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font &gt;According to the principles followed by khap panchayats, there could be no marriage alliance between a man and a woman if they were of same gotra or belonged to different castes. Even if they had same caste and differentgotras, they still cannot marry if they resided in the same or adjoining villages. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;Hindi&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 42114,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Govt to make honour killing distinct offence by Dhananjay Mahapatra&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Rattled by the spate of honour killings in northern states, the UPA government is preparing a legislative route to amend Indian Penal Code (IPC) and provide a deterrent punishment against khap panchayats, which order death penalty to young couples who marry defying caste barrier. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;We are seriously considering amending Indian Penal Code to make honour killing a separate and distinct offence and provide deterrent punishment,&amp;quot; a top home ministry source told TOI. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The preparation to draft a bill to amend IPC to make honour killings distinct from ordinary murders by widening its definition under Section 302 gained speed after attorney general G E Vahanvati recently gave an opinion answering in the affirmative the home ministry&#039;s query `whether legislative intervention was necessary to make honour killings a specific offence&#039;. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Honour killings, mostly reported from Haryana, western Uttar Pradesh, Punjab, rural Delhi and some areas in southern India, had evoked sharp reaction from home minister P Chidambaram. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;In Rajya Sabha, Chidambaram had said on July 28 last year, &amp;quot;We deplore honour killings. We do not recognise the right of caste panchayats to take upon itself to pronounce whether a man or a woman should live together or a woman has committed an act, which, allegedly bring dishonour to the family or community. That is not the function of caste panchayat. No caste panchayat has a right to pronounce upon the conduct of individuals.&amp;quot; &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;While considering an amendment to IPC, the legal brains would take into account various facts -- whether it is possible to treat leaders of khap panchayat, if not all participants, not as accomplices or abettors but as main conspirators in the honour killing and whether to punish those who justify such brutal murders as in the case of the banned custom of sati. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Another suggestion receiving attention of the home ministry is whether to put the burden of proof on the accused in honour killing cases since these crimes often remain closely guarded family secrets making it difficult for the police to get witnesses. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The push for the possible amendment of IPC to make honour killings a separate offence and make it distinct and wider from ordinary murder came from the Punjab and Haryana High Court, which in the recent past had been flooded with applications from young couples seeking protection from caste panchayats and caste-blinded relatives. The HC had said it was time that society protected such harassed couples. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;According to the principles followed by khap panchayats, there could be no marriage alliance between a man and a woman if they were of same gotra or belonged to different castes. Even if they had same caste and differentgotras, they still cannot marry if they resided in the same or adjoining villages. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;H&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 82,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;govt-to-make-honour-killing-distinct-offence-by-dhananjay-mahapatra-1235&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 1235,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 42114
$metaTitle = &#039;न्यूज क्लिपिंग्स् | Govt to make honour killing distinct offence by Dhananjay Mahapatra&#039;
$metaKeywords = null
$metaDesc = &#039;
Rattled by the spate of honour killings in northern states, the UPA government is preparing a legislative route to amend Indian Penal Code (IPC) and provide a deterrent punishment against khap panchayats, which order death penalty to young couples who...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font &gt;Rattled by the spate of honour killings in northern states, the UPA government is preparing a legislative route to amend Indian Penal Code (IPC) and provide a deterrent punishment against khap panchayats, which order death penalty to young couples who marry defying caste barrier. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font &gt;&amp;quot;We are seriously considering amending Indian Penal Code to make honour killing a separate and distinct offence and provide deterrent punishment,&amp;quot; a top home ministry source told TOI. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font &gt;The preparation to draft a bill to amend IPC to make honour killings distinct from ordinary murders by widening its definition under Section 302 gained speed after attorney general G E Vahanvati recently gave an opinion answering in the affirmative the home ministry&#039;s query `whether legislative intervention was necessary to make honour killings a specific offence&#039;. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font &gt;Honour killings, mostly reported from Haryana, western Uttar Pradesh, Punjab, rural Delhi and some areas in southern India, had evoked sharp reaction from home minister P Chidambaram. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font &gt;In Rajya Sabha, Chidambaram had said on July 28 last year, &amp;quot;We deplore honour killings. We do not recognise the right of caste panchayats to take upon itself to pronounce whether a man or a woman should live together or a woman has committed an act, which, allegedly bring dishonour to the family or community. That is not the function of caste panchayat. No caste panchayat has a right to pronounce upon the conduct of individuals.&amp;quot; &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font &gt;While considering an amendment to IPC, the legal brains would take into account various facts -- whether it is possible to treat leaders of khap panchayat, if not all participants, not as accomplices or abettors but as main conspirators in the honour killing and whether to punish those who justify such brutal murders as in the case of the banned custom of sati. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font &gt;Another suggestion receiving attention of the home ministry is whether to put the burden of proof on the accused in honour killing cases since these crimes often remain closely guarded family secrets making it difficult for the police to get witnesses. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font &gt;The push for the possible amendment of IPC to make honour killings a separate offence and make it distinct and wider from ordinary murder came from the Punjab and Haryana High Court, which in the recent past had been flooded with applications from young couples seeking protection from caste panchayats and caste-blinded relatives. The HC had said it was time that society protected such harassed couples. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font &gt;According to the principles followed by khap panchayats, there could be no marriage alliance between a man and a woman if they were of same gotra or belonged to different castes. Even if they had same caste and differentgotras, they still cannot marry if they resided in the same or adjoining villages. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;Hindi&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>news-clippings/govt-to-make-honour-killing-distinct-offence-by-dhananjay-mahapatra-1235.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>न्यूज क्लिपिंग्स् | Govt to make honour killing distinct offence by Dhananjay Mahapatra | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
Rattled by the spate of honour killings in northern states, the UPA government is preparing a legislative route to amend Indian Penal Code (IPC) and provide a deterrent punishment against khap panchayats, which order death penalty to young couples who..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Govt to make honour killing distinct offence by Dhananjay Mahapatra</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <p align="justify">
<font >Rattled by the spate of honour killings in northern states, the UPA government is preparing a legislative route to amend Indian Penal Code (IPC) and provide a deterrent punishment against khap panchayats, which order death penalty to young couples who marry defying caste barrier. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font >&quot;We are seriously considering amending Indian Penal Code to make honour killing a separate and distinct offence and provide deterrent punishment,&quot; a top home ministry source told TOI. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font >The preparation to draft a bill to amend IPC to make honour killings distinct from ordinary murders by widening its definition under Section 302 gained speed after attorney general G E Vahanvati recently gave an opinion answering in the affirmative the home ministry's query `whether legislative intervention was necessary to make honour killings a specific offence'. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font >Honour killings, mostly reported from Haryana, western Uttar Pradesh, Punjab, rural Delhi and some areas in southern India, had evoked sharp reaction from home minister P Chidambaram. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font >In Rajya Sabha, Chidambaram had said on July 28 last year, &quot;We deplore honour killings. We do not recognise the right of caste panchayats to take upon itself to pronounce whether a man or a woman should live together or a woman has committed an act, which, allegedly bring dishonour to the family or community. That is not the function of caste panchayat. No caste panchayat has a right to pronounce upon the conduct of individuals.&quot; </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font >While considering an amendment to IPC, the legal brains would take into account various facts -- whether it is possible to treat leaders of khap panchayat, if not all participants, not as accomplices or abettors but as main conspirators in the honour killing and whether to punish those who justify such brutal murders as in the case of the banned custom of sati. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font >Another suggestion receiving attention of the home ministry is whether to put the burden of proof on the accused in honour killing cases since these crimes often remain closely guarded family secrets making it difficult for the police to get witnesses. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font >The push for the possible amendment of IPC to make honour killings a separate offence and make it distinct and wider from ordinary murder came from the Punjab and Haryana High Court, which in the recent past had been flooded with applications from young couples seeking protection from caste panchayats and caste-blinded relatives. The HC had said it was time that society protected such harassed couples. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font >According to the principles followed by khap panchayats, there could be no marriage alliance between a man and a woman if they were of same gotra or belonged to different castes. Even if they had same caste and differentgotras, they still cannot marry if they resided in the same or adjoining villages. </font>
</p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6e66728c97-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6e66728c97-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f6e66728c97-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6e66728c97-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6e66728c97-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6e66728c97-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6e66728c97-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f6e66728c97-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f6e66728c97-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 42114,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Govt to make honour killing distinct offence by Dhananjay Mahapatra&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Rattled by the spate of honour killings in northern states, the UPA government is preparing a legislative route to amend Indian Penal Code (IPC) and provide a deterrent punishment against khap panchayats, which order death penalty to young couples who marry defying caste barrier. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;We are seriously considering amending Indian Penal Code to make honour killing a separate and distinct offence and provide deterrent punishment,&amp;quot; a top home ministry source told TOI. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The preparation to draft a bill to amend IPC to make honour killings distinct from ordinary murders by widening its definition under Section 302 gained speed after attorney general G E Vahanvati recently gave an opinion answering in the affirmative the home ministry&#039;s query `whether legislative intervention was necessary to make honour killings a specific offence&#039;. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Honour killings, mostly reported from Haryana, western Uttar Pradesh, Punjab, rural Delhi and some areas in southern India, had evoked sharp reaction from home minister P Chidambaram. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;In Rajya Sabha, Chidambaram had said on July 28 last year, &amp;quot;We deplore honour killings. We do not recognise the right of caste panchayats to take upon itself to pronounce whether a man or a woman should live together or a woman has committed an act, which, allegedly bring dishonour to the family or community. That is not the function of caste panchayat. No caste panchayat has a right to pronounce upon the conduct of individuals.&amp;quot; &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;While considering an amendment to IPC, the legal brains would take into account various facts -- whether it is possible to treat leaders of khap panchayat, if not all participants, not as accomplices or abettors but as main conspirators in the honour killing and whether to punish those who justify such brutal murders as in the case of the banned custom of sati. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Another suggestion receiving attention of the home ministry is whether to put the burden of proof on the accused in honour killing cases since these crimes often remain closely guarded family secrets making it difficult for the police to get witnesses. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The push for the possible amendment of IPC to make honour killings a separate offence and make it distinct and wider from ordinary murder came from the Punjab and Haryana High Court, which in the recent past had been flooded with applications from young couples seeking protection from caste panchayats and caste-blinded relatives. The HC had said it was time that society protected such harassed couples. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;According to the principles followed by khap panchayats, there could be no marriage alliance between a man and a woman if they were of same gotra or belonged to different castes. Even if they had same caste and differentgotras, they still cannot marry if they resided in the same or adjoining villages. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;H&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 82,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;govt-to-make-honour-killing-distinct-offence-by-dhananjay-mahapatra-1235&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 1235,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 42114,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;न्यूज क्लिपिंग्स् | Govt to make honour killing distinct offence by Dhananjay Mahapatra&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
Rattled by the spate of honour killings in northern states, the UPA government is preparing a legislative route to amend Indian Penal Code (IPC) and provide a deterrent punishment against khap panchayats, which order death penalty to young couples who...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font &gt;Rattled by the spate of honour killings in northern states, the UPA government is preparing a legislative route to amend Indian Penal Code (IPC) and provide a deterrent punishment against khap panchayats, which order death penalty to young couples who marry defying caste barrier. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font &gt;&amp;quot;We are seriously considering amending Indian Penal Code to make honour killing a separate and distinct offence and provide deterrent punishment,&amp;quot; a top home ministry source told TOI. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font &gt;The preparation to draft a bill to amend IPC to make honour killings distinct from ordinary murders by widening its definition under Section 302 gained speed after attorney general G E Vahanvati recently gave an opinion answering in the affirmative the home ministry&#039;s query `whether legislative intervention was necessary to make honour killings a specific offence&#039;. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font &gt;Honour killings, mostly reported from Haryana, western Uttar Pradesh, Punjab, rural Delhi and some areas in southern India, had evoked sharp reaction from home minister P Chidambaram. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font &gt;In Rajya Sabha, Chidambaram had said on July 28 last year, &amp;quot;We deplore honour killings. We do not recognise the right of caste panchayats to take upon itself to pronounce whether a man or a woman should live together or a woman has committed an act, which, allegedly bring dishonour to the family or community. That is not the function of caste panchayat. No caste panchayat has a right to pronounce upon the conduct of individuals.&amp;quot; &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font &gt;While considering an amendment to IPC, the legal brains would take into account various facts -- whether it is possible to treat leaders of khap panchayat, if not all participants, not as accomplices or abettors but as main conspirators in the honour killing and whether to punish those who justify such brutal murders as in the case of the banned custom of sati. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font &gt;Another suggestion receiving attention of the home ministry is whether to put the burden of proof on the accused in honour killing cases since these crimes often remain closely guarded family secrets making it difficult for the police to get witnesses. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font &gt;The push for the possible amendment of IPC to make honour killings a separate offence and make it distinct and wider from ordinary murder came from the Punjab and Haryana High Court, which in the recent past had been flooded with applications from young couples seeking protection from caste panchayats and caste-blinded relatives. The HC had said it was time that society protected such harassed couples. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font &gt;According to the principles followed by khap panchayats, there could be no marriage alliance between a man and a woman if they were of same gotra or belonged to different castes. Even if they had same caste and differentgotras, they still cannot marry if they resided in the same or adjoining villages. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;Hindi&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 42114,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Govt to make honour killing distinct offence by Dhananjay Mahapatra&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Rattled by the spate of honour killings in northern states, the UPA government is preparing a legislative route to amend Indian Penal Code (IPC) and provide a deterrent punishment against khap panchayats, which order death penalty to young couples who marry defying caste barrier. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;We are seriously considering amending Indian Penal Code to make honour killing a separate and distinct offence and provide deterrent punishment,&amp;quot; a top home ministry source told TOI. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The preparation to draft a bill to amend IPC to make honour killings distinct from ordinary murders by widening its definition under Section 302 gained speed after attorney general G E Vahanvati recently gave an opinion answering in the affirmative the home ministry&#039;s query `whether legislative intervention was necessary to make honour killings a specific offence&#039;. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Honour killings, mostly reported from Haryana, western Uttar Pradesh, Punjab, rural Delhi and some areas in southern India, had evoked sharp reaction from home minister P Chidambaram. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;In Rajya Sabha, Chidambaram had said on July 28 last year, &amp;quot;We deplore honour killings. We do not recognise the right of caste panchayats to take upon itself to pronounce whether a man or a woman should live together or a woman has committed an act, which, allegedly bring dishonour to the family or community. That is not the function of caste panchayat. No caste panchayat has a right to pronounce upon the conduct of individuals.&amp;quot; &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;While considering an amendment to IPC, the legal brains would take into account various facts -- whether it is possible to treat leaders of khap panchayat, if not all participants, not as accomplices or abettors but as main conspirators in the honour killing and whether to punish those who justify such brutal murders as in the case of the banned custom of sati. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Another suggestion receiving attention of the home ministry is whether to put the burden of proof on the accused in honour killing cases since these crimes often remain closely guarded family secrets making it difficult for the police to get witnesses. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The push for the possible amendment of IPC to make honour killings a separate offence and make it distinct and wider from ordinary murder came from the Punjab and Haryana High Court, which in the recent past had been flooded with applications from young couples seeking protection from caste panchayats and caste-blinded relatives. The HC had said it was time that society protected such harassed couples. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;According to the principles followed by khap panchayats, there could be no marriage alliance between a man and a woman if they were of same gotra or belonged to different castes. Even if they had same caste and differentgotras, they still cannot marry if they resided in the same or adjoining villages. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;H&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 82,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;govt-to-make-honour-killing-distinct-offence-by-dhananjay-mahapatra-1235&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 1235,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 42114
$metaTitle = &#039;न्यूज क्लिपिंग्स् | Govt to make honour killing distinct offence by Dhananjay Mahapatra&#039;
$metaKeywords = null
$metaDesc = &#039;
Rattled by the spate of honour killings in northern states, the UPA government is preparing a legislative route to amend Indian Penal Code (IPC) and provide a deterrent punishment against khap panchayats, which order death penalty to young couples who...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font &gt;Rattled by the spate of honour killings in northern states, the UPA government is preparing a legislative route to amend Indian Penal Code (IPC) and provide a deterrent punishment against khap panchayats, which order death penalty to young couples who marry defying caste barrier. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font &gt;&amp;quot;We are seriously considering amending Indian Penal Code to make honour killing a separate and distinct offence and provide deterrent punishment,&amp;quot; a top home ministry source told TOI. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font &gt;The preparation to draft a bill to amend IPC to make honour killings distinct from ordinary murders by widening its definition under Section 302 gained speed after attorney general G E Vahanvati recently gave an opinion answering in the affirmative the home ministry&#039;s query `whether legislative intervention was necessary to make honour killings a specific offence&#039;. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font &gt;Honour killings, mostly reported from Haryana, western Uttar Pradesh, Punjab, rural Delhi and some areas in southern India, had evoked sharp reaction from home minister P Chidambaram. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font &gt;In Rajya Sabha, Chidambaram had said on July 28 last year, &amp;quot;We deplore honour killings. We do not recognise the right of caste panchayats to take upon itself to pronounce whether a man or a woman should live together or a woman has committed an act, which, allegedly bring dishonour to the family or community. That is not the function of caste panchayat. No caste panchayat has a right to pronounce upon the conduct of individuals.&amp;quot; &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font &gt;While considering an amendment to IPC, the legal brains would take into account various facts -- whether it is possible to treat leaders of khap panchayat, if not all participants, not as accomplices or abettors but as main conspirators in the honour killing and whether to punish those who justify such brutal murders as in the case of the banned custom of sati. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font &gt;Another suggestion receiving attention of the home ministry is whether to put the burden of proof on the accused in honour killing cases since these crimes often remain closely guarded family secrets making it difficult for the police to get witnesses. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font &gt;The push for the possible amendment of IPC to make honour killings a separate offence and make it distinct and wider from ordinary murder came from the Punjab and Haryana High Court, which in the recent past had been flooded with applications from young couples seeking protection from caste panchayats and caste-blinded relatives. The HC had said it was time that society protected such harassed couples. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font &gt;According to the principles followed by khap panchayats, there could be no marriage alliance between a man and a woman if they were of same gotra or belonged to different castes. Even if they had same caste and differentgotras, they still cannot marry if they resided in the same or adjoining villages. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;Hindi&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>news-clippings/govt-to-make-honour-killing-distinct-offence-by-dhananjay-mahapatra-1235.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>न्यूज क्लिपिंग्स् | Govt to make honour killing distinct offence by Dhananjay Mahapatra | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
Rattled by the spate of honour killings in northern states, the UPA government is preparing a legislative route to amend Indian Penal Code (IPC) and provide a deterrent punishment against khap panchayats, which order death penalty to young couples who..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Govt to make honour killing distinct offence by Dhananjay Mahapatra</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <p align="justify">
<font >Rattled by the spate of honour killings in northern states, the UPA government is preparing a legislative route to amend Indian Penal Code (IPC) and provide a deterrent punishment against khap panchayats, which order death penalty to young couples who marry defying caste barrier. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font >&quot;We are seriously considering amending Indian Penal Code to make honour killing a separate and distinct offence and provide deterrent punishment,&quot; a top home ministry source told TOI. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font >The preparation to draft a bill to amend IPC to make honour killings distinct from ordinary murders by widening its definition under Section 302 gained speed after attorney general G E Vahanvati recently gave an opinion answering in the affirmative the home ministry's query `whether legislative intervention was necessary to make honour killings a specific offence'. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font >Honour killings, mostly reported from Haryana, western Uttar Pradesh, Punjab, rural Delhi and some areas in southern India, had evoked sharp reaction from home minister P Chidambaram. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font >In Rajya Sabha, Chidambaram had said on July 28 last year, &quot;We deplore honour killings. We do not recognise the right of caste panchayats to take upon itself to pronounce whether a man or a woman should live together or a woman has committed an act, which, allegedly bring dishonour to the family or community. That is not the function of caste panchayat. No caste panchayat has a right to pronounce upon the conduct of individuals.&quot; </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font >While considering an amendment to IPC, the legal brains would take into account various facts -- whether it is possible to treat leaders of khap panchayat, if not all participants, not as accomplices or abettors but as main conspirators in the honour killing and whether to punish those who justify such brutal murders as in the case of the banned custom of sati. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font >Another suggestion receiving attention of the home ministry is whether to put the burden of proof on the accused in honour killing cases since these crimes often remain closely guarded family secrets making it difficult for the police to get witnesses. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font >The push for the possible amendment of IPC to make honour killings a separate offence and make it distinct and wider from ordinary murder came from the Punjab and Haryana High Court, which in the recent past had been flooded with applications from young couples seeking protection from caste panchayats and caste-blinded relatives. The HC had said it was time that society protected such harassed couples. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font >According to the principles followed by khap panchayats, there could be no marriage alliance between a man and a woman if they were of same gotra or belonged to different castes. Even if they had same caste and differentgotras, they still cannot marry if they resided in the same or adjoining villages. </font>
</p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6e66728c97-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6e66728c97-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f6e66728c97-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6e66728c97-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6e66728c97-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6e66728c97-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6e66728c97-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f6e66728c97-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f6e66728c97-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 42114,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Govt to make honour killing distinct offence by Dhananjay Mahapatra&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Rattled by the spate of honour killings in northern states, the UPA government is preparing a legislative route to amend Indian Penal Code (IPC) and provide a deterrent punishment against khap panchayats, which order death penalty to young couples who marry defying caste barrier. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;We are seriously considering amending Indian Penal Code to make honour killing a separate and distinct offence and provide deterrent punishment,&amp;quot; a top home ministry source told TOI. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The preparation to draft a bill to amend IPC to make honour killings distinct from ordinary murders by widening its definition under Section 302 gained speed after attorney general G E Vahanvati recently gave an opinion answering in the affirmative the home ministry&#039;s query `whether legislative intervention was necessary to make honour killings a specific offence&#039;. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Honour killings, mostly reported from Haryana, western Uttar Pradesh, Punjab, rural Delhi and some areas in southern India, had evoked sharp reaction from home minister P Chidambaram. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;In Rajya Sabha, Chidambaram had said on July 28 last year, &amp;quot;We deplore honour killings. We do not recognise the right of caste panchayats to take upon itself to pronounce whether a man or a woman should live together or a woman has committed an act, which, allegedly bring dishonour to the family or community. That is not the function of caste panchayat. No caste panchayat has a right to pronounce upon the conduct of individuals.&amp;quot; &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;While considering an amendment to IPC, the legal brains would take into account various facts -- whether it is possible to treat leaders of khap panchayat, if not all participants, not as accomplices or abettors but as main conspirators in the honour killing and whether to punish those who justify such brutal murders as in the case of the banned custom of sati. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Another suggestion receiving attention of the home ministry is whether to put the burden of proof on the accused in honour killing cases since these crimes often remain closely guarded family secrets making it difficult for the police to get witnesses. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The push for the possible amendment of IPC to make honour killings a separate offence and make it distinct and wider from ordinary murder came from the Punjab and Haryana High Court, which in the recent past had been flooded with applications from young couples seeking protection from caste panchayats and caste-blinded relatives. The HC had said it was time that society protected such harassed couples. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;According to the principles followed by khap panchayats, there could be no marriage alliance between a man and a woman if they were of same gotra or belonged to different castes. Even if they had same caste and differentgotras, they still cannot marry if they resided in the same or adjoining villages. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;H&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 82,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;govt-to-make-honour-killing-distinct-offence-by-dhananjay-mahapatra-1235&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 1235,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 42114,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;न्यूज क्लिपिंग्स् | Govt to make honour killing distinct offence by Dhananjay Mahapatra&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
Rattled by the spate of honour killings in northern states, the UPA government is preparing a legislative route to amend Indian Penal Code (IPC) and provide a deterrent punishment against khap panchayats, which order death penalty to young couples who...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font &gt;Rattled by the spate of honour killings in northern states, the UPA government is preparing a legislative route to amend Indian Penal Code (IPC) and provide a deterrent punishment against khap panchayats, which order death penalty to young couples who marry defying caste barrier. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font &gt;&amp;quot;We are seriously considering amending Indian Penal Code to make honour killing a separate and distinct offence and provide deterrent punishment,&amp;quot; a top home ministry source told TOI. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font &gt;The preparation to draft a bill to amend IPC to make honour killings distinct from ordinary murders by widening its definition under Section 302 gained speed after attorney general G E Vahanvati recently gave an opinion answering in the affirmative the home ministry&#039;s query `whether legislative intervention was necessary to make honour killings a specific offence&#039;. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font &gt;Honour killings, mostly reported from Haryana, western Uttar Pradesh, Punjab, rural Delhi and some areas in southern India, had evoked sharp reaction from home minister P Chidambaram. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font &gt;In Rajya Sabha, Chidambaram had said on July 28 last year, &amp;quot;We deplore honour killings. We do not recognise the right of caste panchayats to take upon itself to pronounce whether a man or a woman should live together or a woman has committed an act, which, allegedly bring dishonour to the family or community. That is not the function of caste panchayat. No caste panchayat has a right to pronounce upon the conduct of individuals.&amp;quot; &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font &gt;While considering an amendment to IPC, the legal brains would take into account various facts -- whether it is possible to treat leaders of khap panchayat, if not all participants, not as accomplices or abettors but as main conspirators in the honour killing and whether to punish those who justify such brutal murders as in the case of the banned custom of sati. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font &gt;Another suggestion receiving attention of the home ministry is whether to put the burden of proof on the accused in honour killing cases since these crimes often remain closely guarded family secrets making it difficult for the police to get witnesses. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font &gt;The push for the possible amendment of IPC to make honour killings a separate offence and make it distinct and wider from ordinary murder came from the Punjab and Haryana High Court, which in the recent past had been flooded with applications from young couples seeking protection from caste panchayats and caste-blinded relatives. The HC had said it was time that society protected such harassed couples. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font &gt;According to the principles followed by khap panchayats, there could be no marriage alliance between a man and a woman if they were of same gotra or belonged to different castes. Even if they had same caste and differentgotras, they still cannot marry if they resided in the same or adjoining villages. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;Hindi&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 42114,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Govt to make honour killing distinct offence by Dhananjay Mahapatra&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Rattled by the spate of honour killings in northern states, the UPA government is preparing a legislative route to amend Indian Penal Code (IPC) and provide a deterrent punishment against khap panchayats, which order death penalty to young couples who marry defying caste barrier. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;We are seriously considering amending Indian Penal Code to make honour killing a separate and distinct offence and provide deterrent punishment,&amp;quot; a top home ministry source told TOI. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The preparation to draft a bill to amend IPC to make honour killings distinct from ordinary murders by widening its definition under Section 302 gained speed after attorney general G E Vahanvati recently gave an opinion answering in the affirmative the home ministry&#039;s query `whether legislative intervention was necessary to make honour killings a specific offence&#039;. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Honour killings, mostly reported from Haryana, western Uttar Pradesh, Punjab, rural Delhi and some areas in southern India, had evoked sharp reaction from home minister P Chidambaram. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;In Rajya Sabha, Chidambaram had said on July 28 last year, &amp;quot;We deplore honour killings. We do not recognise the right of caste panchayats to take upon itself to pronounce whether a man or a woman should live together or a woman has committed an act, which, allegedly bring dishonour to the family or community. That is not the function of caste panchayat. No caste panchayat has a right to pronounce upon the conduct of individuals.&amp;quot; &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;While considering an amendment to IPC, the legal brains would take into account various facts -- whether it is possible to treat leaders of khap panchayat, if not all participants, not as accomplices or abettors but as main conspirators in the honour killing and whether to punish those who justify such brutal murders as in the case of the banned custom of sati. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Another suggestion receiving attention of the home ministry is whether to put the burden of proof on the accused in honour killing cases since these crimes often remain closely guarded family secrets making it difficult for the police to get witnesses. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The push for the possible amendment of IPC to make honour killings a separate offence and make it distinct and wider from ordinary murder came from the Punjab and Haryana High Court, which in the recent past had been flooded with applications from young couples seeking protection from caste panchayats and caste-blinded relatives. The HC had said it was time that society protected such harassed couples. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;According to the principles followed by khap panchayats, there could be no marriage alliance between a man and a woman if they were of same gotra or belonged to different castes. Even if they had same caste and differentgotras, they still cannot marry if they resided in the same or adjoining villages. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;H&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 82,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;govt-to-make-honour-killing-distinct-offence-by-dhananjay-mahapatra-1235&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 1235,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 42114
$metaTitle = &#039;न्यूज क्लिपिंग्स् | Govt to make honour killing distinct offence by Dhananjay Mahapatra&#039;
$metaKeywords = null
$metaDesc = &#039;
Rattled by the spate of honour killings in northern states, the UPA government is preparing a legislative route to amend Indian Penal Code (IPC) and provide a deterrent punishment against khap panchayats, which order death penalty to young couples who...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font &gt;Rattled by the spate of honour killings in northern states, the UPA government is preparing a legislative route to amend Indian Penal Code (IPC) and provide a deterrent punishment against khap panchayats, which order death penalty to young couples who marry defying caste barrier. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font &gt;&amp;quot;We are seriously considering amending Indian Penal Code to make honour killing a separate and distinct offence and provide deterrent punishment,&amp;quot; a top home ministry source told TOI. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font &gt;The preparation to draft a bill to amend IPC to make honour killings distinct from ordinary murders by widening its definition under Section 302 gained speed after attorney general G E Vahanvati recently gave an opinion answering in the affirmative the home ministry&#039;s query `whether legislative intervention was necessary to make honour killings a specific offence&#039;. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font &gt;Honour killings, mostly reported from Haryana, western Uttar Pradesh, Punjab, rural Delhi and some areas in southern India, had evoked sharp reaction from home minister P Chidambaram. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font &gt;In Rajya Sabha, Chidambaram had said on July 28 last year, &amp;quot;We deplore honour killings. We do not recognise the right of caste panchayats to take upon itself to pronounce whether a man or a woman should live together or a woman has committed an act, which, allegedly bring dishonour to the family or community. That is not the function of caste panchayat. No caste panchayat has a right to pronounce upon the conduct of individuals.&amp;quot; &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font &gt;While considering an amendment to IPC, the legal brains would take into account various facts -- whether it is possible to treat leaders of khap panchayat, if not all participants, not as accomplices or abettors but as main conspirators in the honour killing and whether to punish those who justify such brutal murders as in the case of the banned custom of sati. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font &gt;Another suggestion receiving attention of the home ministry is whether to put the burden of proof on the accused in honour killing cases since these crimes often remain closely guarded family secrets making it difficult for the police to get witnesses. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font &gt;The push for the possible amendment of IPC to make honour killings a separate offence and make it distinct and wider from ordinary murder came from the Punjab and Haryana High Court, which in the recent past had been flooded with applications from young couples seeking protection from caste panchayats and caste-blinded relatives. The HC had said it was time that society protected such harassed couples. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font &gt;According to the principles followed by khap panchayats, there could be no marriage alliance between a man and a woman if they were of same gotra or belonged to different castes. Even if they had same caste and differentgotras, they still cannot marry if they resided in the same or adjoining villages. &lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;Hindi&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>news-clippings/govt-to-make-honour-killing-distinct-offence-by-dhananjay-mahapatra-1235.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>न्यूज क्लिपिंग्स् | Govt to make honour killing distinct offence by Dhananjay Mahapatra | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
Rattled by the spate of honour killings in northern states, the UPA government is preparing a legislative route to amend Indian Penal Code (IPC) and provide a deterrent punishment against khap panchayats, which order death penalty to young couples who..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Govt to make honour killing distinct offence by Dhananjay Mahapatra</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <p align="justify">
<font >Rattled by the spate of honour killings in northern states, the UPA government is preparing a legislative route to amend Indian Penal Code (IPC) and provide a deterrent punishment against khap panchayats, which order death penalty to young couples who marry defying caste barrier. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font >&quot;We are seriously considering amending Indian Penal Code to make honour killing a separate and distinct offence and provide deterrent punishment,&quot; a top home ministry source told TOI. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font >The preparation to draft a bill to amend IPC to make honour killings distinct from ordinary murders by widening its definition under Section 302 gained speed after attorney general G E Vahanvati recently gave an opinion answering in the affirmative the home ministry's query `whether legislative intervention was necessary to make honour killings a specific offence'. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font >Honour killings, mostly reported from Haryana, western Uttar Pradesh, Punjab, rural Delhi and some areas in southern India, had evoked sharp reaction from home minister P Chidambaram. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font >In Rajya Sabha, Chidambaram had said on July 28 last year, &quot;We deplore honour killings. We do not recognise the right of caste panchayats to take upon itself to pronounce whether a man or a woman should live together or a woman has committed an act, which, allegedly bring dishonour to the family or community. That is not the function of caste panchayat. No caste panchayat has a right to pronounce upon the conduct of individuals.&quot; </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font >While considering an amendment to IPC, the legal brains would take into account various facts -- whether it is possible to treat leaders of khap panchayat, if not all participants, not as accomplices or abettors but as main conspirators in the honour killing and whether to punish those who justify such brutal murders as in the case of the banned custom of sati. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font >Another suggestion receiving attention of the home ministry is whether to put the burden of proof on the accused in honour killing cases since these crimes often remain closely guarded family secrets making it difficult for the police to get witnesses. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font >The push for the possible amendment of IPC to make honour killings a separate offence and make it distinct and wider from ordinary murder came from the Punjab and Haryana High Court, which in the recent past had been flooded with applications from young couples seeking protection from caste panchayats and caste-blinded relatives. The HC had said it was time that society protected such harassed couples. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font >According to the principles followed by khap panchayats, there could be no marriage alliance between a man and a woman if they were of same gotra or belonged to different castes. Even if they had same caste and differentgotras, they still cannot marry if they resided in the same or adjoining villages. </font>
</p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 42114,
		'title' => 'Govt to make honour killing distinct offence by Dhananjay Mahapatra',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Rattled by the spate of honour killings in northern states, the UPA government is preparing a legislative route to amend Indian Penal Code (IPC) and provide a deterrent punishment against khap panchayats, which order death penalty to young couples who marry defying caste barrier. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&quot;We are seriously considering amending Indian Penal Code to make honour killing a separate and distinct offence and provide deterrent punishment,&quot; a top home ministry source told TOI. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The preparation to draft a bill to amend IPC to make honour killings distinct from ordinary murders by widening its definition under Section 302 gained speed after attorney general G E Vahanvati recently gave an opinion answering in the affirmative the home ministry's query `whether legislative intervention was necessary to make honour killings a specific offence'. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Honour killings, mostly reported from Haryana, western Uttar Pradesh, Punjab, rural Delhi and some areas in southern India, had evoked sharp reaction from home minister P Chidambaram. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In Rajya Sabha, Chidambaram had said on July 28 last year, &quot;We deplore honour killings. We do not recognise the right of caste panchayats to take upon itself to pronounce whether a man or a woman should live together or a woman has committed an act, which, allegedly bring dishonour to the family or community. That is not the function of caste panchayat. No caste panchayat has a right to pronounce upon the conduct of individuals.&quot; </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">While considering an amendment to IPC, the legal brains would take into account various facts -- whether it is possible to treat leaders of khap panchayat, if not all participants, not as accomplices or abettors but as main conspirators in the honour killing and whether to punish those who justify such brutal murders as in the case of the banned custom of sati. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Another suggestion receiving attention of the home ministry is whether to put the burden of proof on the accused in honour killing cases since these crimes often remain closely guarded family secrets making it difficult for the police to get witnesses. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The push for the possible amendment of IPC to make honour killings a separate offence and make it distinct and wider from ordinary murder came from the Punjab and Haryana High Court, which in the recent past had been flooded with applications from young couples seeking protection from caste panchayats and caste-blinded relatives. The HC had said it was time that society protected such harassed couples. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">According to the principles followed by khap panchayats, there could be no marriage alliance between a man and a woman if they were of same gotra or belonged to different castes. Even if they had same caste and differentgotras, they still cannot marry if they resided in the same or adjoining villages. </font>
</p>
',
		'credit_writer' => '',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'H',
		'category_id' => (int) 82,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'govt-to-make-honour-killing-distinct-offence-by-dhananjay-mahapatra-1235',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 1235,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 42114,
	'metaTitle' => 'न्यूज क्लिपिंग्स् | Govt to make honour killing distinct offence by Dhananjay Mahapatra',
	'metaKeywords' => null,
	'metaDesc' => '
Rattled by the spate of honour killings in northern states, the UPA government is preparing a legislative route to amend Indian Penal Code (IPC) and provide a deterrent punishment against khap panchayats, which order death penalty to young couples who...',
	'disp' => '<p align="justify">
<font >Rattled by the spate of honour killings in northern states, the UPA government is preparing a legislative route to amend Indian Penal Code (IPC) and provide a deterrent punishment against khap panchayats, which order death penalty to young couples who marry defying caste barrier. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font >&quot;We are seriously considering amending Indian Penal Code to make honour killing a separate and distinct offence and provide deterrent punishment,&quot; a top home ministry source told TOI. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font >The preparation to draft a bill to amend IPC to make honour killings distinct from ordinary murders by widening its definition under Section 302 gained speed after attorney general G E Vahanvati recently gave an opinion answering in the affirmative the home ministry's query `whether legislative intervention was necessary to make honour killings a specific offence'. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font >Honour killings, mostly reported from Haryana, western Uttar Pradesh, Punjab, rural Delhi and some areas in southern India, had evoked sharp reaction from home minister P Chidambaram. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font >In Rajya Sabha, Chidambaram had said on July 28 last year, &quot;We deplore honour killings. We do not recognise the right of caste panchayats to take upon itself to pronounce whether a man or a woman should live together or a woman has committed an act, which, allegedly bring dishonour to the family or community. That is not the function of caste panchayat. No caste panchayat has a right to pronounce upon the conduct of individuals.&quot; </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font >While considering an amendment to IPC, the legal brains would take into account various facts -- whether it is possible to treat leaders of khap panchayat, if not all participants, not as accomplices or abettors but as main conspirators in the honour killing and whether to punish those who justify such brutal murders as in the case of the banned custom of sati. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font >Another suggestion receiving attention of the home ministry is whether to put the burden of proof on the accused in honour killing cases since these crimes often remain closely guarded family secrets making it difficult for the police to get witnesses. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font >The push for the possible amendment of IPC to make honour killings a separate offence and make it distinct and wider from ordinary murder came from the Punjab and Haryana High Court, which in the recent past had been flooded with applications from young couples seeking protection from caste panchayats and caste-blinded relatives. The HC had said it was time that society protected such harassed couples. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font >According to the principles followed by khap panchayats, there could be no marriage alliance between a man and a woman if they were of same gotra or belonged to different castes. Even if they had same caste and differentgotras, they still cannot marry if they resided in the same or adjoining villages. </font>
</p>',
	'lang' => 'Hindi',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 42114,
	'title' => 'Govt to make honour killing distinct offence by Dhananjay Mahapatra',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Rattled by the spate of honour killings in northern states, the UPA government is preparing a legislative route to amend Indian Penal Code (IPC) and provide a deterrent punishment against khap panchayats, which order death penalty to young couples who marry defying caste barrier. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&quot;We are seriously considering amending Indian Penal Code to make honour killing a separate and distinct offence and provide deterrent punishment,&quot; a top home ministry source told TOI. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The preparation to draft a bill to amend IPC to make honour killings distinct from ordinary murders by widening its definition under Section 302 gained speed after attorney general G E Vahanvati recently gave an opinion answering in the affirmative the home ministry's query `whether legislative intervention was necessary to make honour killings a specific offence'. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Honour killings, mostly reported from Haryana, western Uttar Pradesh, Punjab, rural Delhi and some areas in southern India, had evoked sharp reaction from home minister P Chidambaram. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In Rajya Sabha, Chidambaram had said on July 28 last year, &quot;We deplore honour killings. We do not recognise the right of caste panchayats to take upon itself to pronounce whether a man or a woman should live together or a woman has committed an act, which, allegedly bring dishonour to the family or community. That is not the function of caste panchayat. No caste panchayat has a right to pronounce upon the conduct of individuals.&quot; </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">While considering an amendment to IPC, the legal brains would take into account various facts -- whether it is possible to treat leaders of khap panchayat, if not all participants, not as accomplices or abettors but as main conspirators in the honour killing and whether to punish those who justify such brutal murders as in the case of the banned custom of sati. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Another suggestion receiving attention of the home ministry is whether to put the burden of proof on the accused in honour killing cases since these crimes often remain closely guarded family secrets making it difficult for the police to get witnesses. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The push for the possible amendment of IPC to make honour killings a separate offence and make it distinct and wider from ordinary murder came from the Punjab and Haryana High Court, which in the recent past had been flooded with applications from young couples seeking protection from caste panchayats and caste-blinded relatives. The HC had said it was time that society protected such harassed couples. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">According to the principles followed by khap panchayats, there could be no marriage alliance between a man and a woman if they were of same gotra or belonged to different castes. Even if they had same caste and differentgotras, they still cannot marry if they resided in the same or adjoining villages. </font>
</p>
',
	'credit_writer' => '',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'H',
	'category_id' => (int) 82,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'govt-to-make-honour-killing-distinct-offence-by-dhananjay-mahapatra-1235',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 1235,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 42114
$metaTitle = 'न्यूज क्लिपिंग्स् | Govt to make honour killing distinct offence by Dhananjay Mahapatra'
$metaKeywords = null
$metaDesc = '
Rattled by the spate of honour killings in northern states, the UPA government is preparing a legislative route to amend Indian Penal Code (IPC) and provide a deterrent punishment against khap panchayats, which order death penalty to young couples who...'
$disp = '<p align="justify">
<font >Rattled by the spate of honour killings in northern states, the UPA government is preparing a legislative route to amend Indian Penal Code (IPC) and provide a deterrent punishment against khap panchayats, which order death penalty to young couples who marry defying caste barrier. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font >&quot;We are seriously considering amending Indian Penal Code to make honour killing a separate and distinct offence and provide deterrent punishment,&quot; a top home ministry source told TOI. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font >The preparation to draft a bill to amend IPC to make honour killings distinct from ordinary murders by widening its definition under Section 302 gained speed after attorney general G E Vahanvati recently gave an opinion answering in the affirmative the home ministry's query `whether legislative intervention was necessary to make honour killings a specific offence'. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font >Honour killings, mostly reported from Haryana, western Uttar Pradesh, Punjab, rural Delhi and some areas in southern India, had evoked sharp reaction from home minister P Chidambaram. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font >In Rajya Sabha, Chidambaram had said on July 28 last year, &quot;We deplore honour killings. We do not recognise the right of caste panchayats to take upon itself to pronounce whether a man or a woman should live together or a woman has committed an act, which, allegedly bring dishonour to the family or community. That is not the function of caste panchayat. No caste panchayat has a right to pronounce upon the conduct of individuals.&quot; </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font >While considering an amendment to IPC, the legal brains would take into account various facts -- whether it is possible to treat leaders of khap panchayat, if not all participants, not as accomplices or abettors but as main conspirators in the honour killing and whether to punish those who justify such brutal murders as in the case of the banned custom of sati. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font >Another suggestion receiving attention of the home ministry is whether to put the burden of proof on the accused in honour killing cases since these crimes often remain closely guarded family secrets making it difficult for the police to get witnesses. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font >The push for the possible amendment of IPC to make honour killings a separate offence and make it distinct and wider from ordinary murder came from the Punjab and Haryana High Court, which in the recent past had been flooded with applications from young couples seeking protection from caste panchayats and caste-blinded relatives. The HC had said it was time that society protected such harassed couples. </font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font >According to the principles followed by khap panchayats, there could be no marriage alliance between a man and a woman if they were of same gotra or belonged to different castes. Even if they had same caste and differentgotras, they still cannot marry if they resided in the same or adjoining villages. </font>
</p>'
$lang = 'Hindi'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

Govt to make honour killing distinct offence by Dhananjay Mahapatra

Rattled by the spate of honour killings in northern states, the UPA government is preparing a legislative route to amend Indian Penal Code (IPC) and provide a deterrent punishment against khap panchayats, which order death penalty to young couples who marry defying caste barrier. "We are seriously considering amending Indian Penal Code to make honour killing a separate and distinct offence and provide deterrent punishment," a top home ministry source told TOI. The preparation to draft a bill to amend IPC to make honour killings distinct from ordinary murders by widening its definition under Section 302 gained speed after attorney general G E Vahanvati recently gave an opinion answering in the affirmative the home ministry's query `whether legislative intervention was necessary to make honour killings a specific offence'. Honour killings, mostly reported from Haryana, western Uttar Pradesh, Punjab, rural Delhi and some areas in southern India, had evoked sharp reaction from home minister P Chidambaram. In Rajya Sabha, Chidambaram had said on July 28 last year, "We deplore honour killings. We do not recognise the right of caste panchayats to take upon itself to pronounce whether a man or a woman should live together or a woman has committed an act, which, allegedly bring dishonour to the family or community. That is not the function of caste panchayat. No caste panchayat has a right to pronounce upon the conduct of individuals." While considering an amendment to IPC, the legal brains would take into account various facts -- whether it is possible to treat leaders of khap panchayat, if not all participants, not as accomplices or abettors but as main conspirators in the honour killing and whether to punish those who justify such brutal murders as in the case of the banned custom of sati. Another suggestion receiving attention of the home ministry is whether to put the burden of proof on the accused in honour killing cases since these crimes often remain closely guarded family secrets making it difficult for the police to get witnesses. The push for the possible amendment of IPC to make honour killings a separate offence and make it distinct and wider from ordinary murder came from the Punjab and Haryana High Court, which in the recent past had been flooded with applications from young couples seeking protection from caste panchayats and caste-blinded relatives. The HC had said it was time that society protected such harassed couples. According to the principles followed by khap panchayats, there could be no marriage alliance between a man and a woman if they were of same gotra or belonged to different castes. Even if they had same caste and differentgotras, they still cannot marry if they resided in the same or adjoining villages.