Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'hindi/news-clippings/not-so-poor-families-may-not-fall-under-food-security-law-by-mahendra-kumar-singh-1290/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/hindi/news-clippings/not-so-poor-families-may-not-fall-under-food-security-law-by-mahendra-kumar-singh-1290/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'hindi/news-clippings/not-so-poor-families-may-not-fall-under-food-security-law-by-mahendra-kumar-singh-1290/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/hindi/news-clippings/not-so-poor-families-may-not-fall-under-food-security-law-by-mahendra-kumar-singh-1290/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6800c96944e5e-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6800c96944e5e-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6800c96944e5e-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6800c96944e5e-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6800c96944e5e-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6800c96944e5e-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6800c96944e5e-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6800c96944e5e-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6800c96944e5e-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 42168, 'title' => 'Not-so-poor families may not fall under food security law by Mahendra Kumar Singh', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Anxious to ensure fiscal discipline and manage financial resources for its flagship programmes, UPA-2 is considering deletion of the Above Poverty Line (APL) beneficiaries from the ambit of the proposed food security law. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">It seems garnering money for UPA's pet promise of &quot;food for all&quot; is turning out to be a big headache as a note circulated for the Empowered Group of Ministers (EGoM) has argued in favour of mandating the states to stick to the BPL figures as estimated by the Planning Commission. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Interestingly, the Suresh Tendulkar Committee which was set up to come out with fresh data on poverty had calculated the BPL number to be about 38% of the population. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">At the all-India level, the plan panel had calculated the BPL families to be around 36% in 1993-94, which it found had declined to 27.5% in 2004-05. The Commission's figure was contested by many state governments. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The EGoM note argued that the Centre should be responsible for determining the number of the poor and the methodology for their identification. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">If the proposal gets the government's nod it will be mandatory under the law for states to adhere to poverty estimates of the Planning Commission. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In what is going to be a tough call for the ministerial panel considering the political sensitivity and financial stakes involved, the note has opposed making any commitment in the proposed food law for providing foodgrains to the APL families and refused to identify the APL families with the index of food insecurity. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&quot;The exclusion of APL families from the food law is understood as the government is already struggling to deal with the swelling BPL numbers in the wake of the Tendulkar Committee report,&quot; said sources. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">According to estimates, funding the &quot;food for all&quot; scheme would imply a cost of over Rs 45,000 crore under the current policies and figures. And if the Tendulkar Committee's 38% BPL figure is taken, the cost to the exchequer for running the scheme will be of the order of Rs 65,000 crore. If APL is also included under the food security law, the cost will around Rs 1,00,000 crore. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Orphans and street children are not expected to be covered under the food security law as the EGoM note has favoured that the issue of ensuring food for these groups could be covered by welfare institutions. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">However, the EGoM note has favoured continuation of the existing status of the Antyodya Anna Yojana, in which 35 kg of rice or wheat is provided to the poorest among the poor at a rate of Rs 2 per kg. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">It has been argued that along with the plan panel's estimate, the latest available census data could also be used to determine the actual BPL ceiling for each state and district. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The projected population figures of the Registrar General of India could be taken for the purpose of five-yearly review of the numerical ceiling. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&quot;There is also the need for a uniform methodology for identification of poor under various government programmes,'' said sources. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The plan panel argues that state-wise there were large variations in the BPL figures and if the 2009 population estimates were accepted, then the total number of poor families would come down to 5.91 crore families. <br /> </font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => '', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'H', 'category_id' => (int) 82, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'not-so-poor-families-may-not-fall-under-food-security-law-by-mahendra-kumar-singh-1290', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 1290, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [[maximum depth reached]], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 42168, 'metaTitle' => 'न्यूज क्लिपिंग्स् | Not-so-poor families may not fall under food security law by Mahendra Kumar Singh', 'metaKeywords' => null, 'metaDesc' => ' Anxious to ensure fiscal discipline and manage financial resources for its flagship programmes, UPA-2 is considering deletion of the Above Poverty Line (APL) beneficiaries from the ambit of the proposed food security law. It seems garnering money for UPA's pet...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"> <font >Anxious to ensure fiscal discipline and manage financial resources for its flagship programmes, UPA-2 is considering deletion of the Above Poverty Line (APL) beneficiaries from the ambit of the proposed food security law. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >It seems garnering money for UPA's pet promise of &quot;food for all&quot; is turning out to be a big headache as a note circulated for the Empowered Group of Ministers (EGoM) has argued in favour of mandating the states to stick to the BPL figures as estimated by the Planning Commission. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >Interestingly, the Suresh Tendulkar Committee which was set up to come out with fresh data on poverty had calculated the BPL number to be about 38% of the population. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >At the all-India level, the plan panel had calculated the BPL families to be around 36% in 1993-94, which it found had declined to 27.5% in 2004-05. The Commission's figure was contested by many state governments. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >The EGoM note argued that the Centre should be responsible for determining the number of the poor and the methodology for their identification. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >If the proposal gets the government's nod it will be mandatory under the law for states to adhere to poverty estimates of the Planning Commission. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >In what is going to be a tough call for the ministerial panel considering the political sensitivity and financial stakes involved, the note has opposed making any commitment in the proposed food law for providing foodgrains to the APL families and refused to identify the APL families with the index of food insecurity. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >&quot;The exclusion of APL families from the food law is understood as the government is already struggling to deal with the swelling BPL numbers in the wake of the Tendulkar Committee report,&quot; said sources. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >According to estimates, funding the &quot;food for all&quot; scheme would imply a cost of over Rs 45,000 crore under the current policies and figures. And if the Tendulkar Committee's 38% BPL figure is taken, the cost to the exchequer for running the scheme will be of the order of Rs 65,000 crore. If APL is also included under the food security law, the cost will around Rs 1,00,000 crore. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >Orphans and street children are not expected to be covered under the food security law as the EGoM note has favoured that the issue of ensuring food for these groups could be covered by welfare institutions. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >However, the EGoM note has favoured continuation of the existing status of the Antyodya Anna Yojana, in which 35 kg of rice or wheat is provided to the poorest among the poor at a rate of Rs 2 per kg. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >It has been argued that along with the plan panel's estimate, the latest available census data could also be used to determine the actual BPL ceiling for each state and district. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >The projected population figures of the Registrar General of India could be taken for the purpose of five-yearly review of the numerical ceiling. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >&quot;There is also the need for a uniform methodology for identification of poor under various government programmes,'' said sources. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >The plan panel argues that state-wise there were large variations in the BPL figures and if the 2009 population estimates were accepted, then the total number of poor families would come down to 5.91 crore families. <br /> </font> </p>', 'lang' => 'Hindi', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 42168, 'title' => 'Not-so-poor families may not fall under food security law by Mahendra Kumar Singh', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Anxious to ensure fiscal discipline and manage financial resources for its flagship programmes, UPA-2 is considering deletion of the Above Poverty Line (APL) beneficiaries from the ambit of the proposed food security law. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">It seems garnering money for UPA's pet promise of &quot;food for all&quot; is turning out to be a big headache as a note circulated for the Empowered Group of Ministers (EGoM) has argued in favour of mandating the states to stick to the BPL figures as estimated by the Planning Commission. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Interestingly, the Suresh Tendulkar Committee which was set up to come out with fresh data on poverty had calculated the BPL number to be about 38% of the population. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">At the all-India level, the plan panel had calculated the BPL families to be around 36% in 1993-94, which it found had declined to 27.5% in 2004-05. The Commission's figure was contested by many state governments. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The EGoM note argued that the Centre should be responsible for determining the number of the poor and the methodology for their identification. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">If the proposal gets the government's nod it will be mandatory under the law for states to adhere to poverty estimates of the Planning Commission. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In what is going to be a tough call for the ministerial panel considering the political sensitivity and financial stakes involved, the note has opposed making any commitment in the proposed food law for providing foodgrains to the APL families and refused to identify the APL families with the index of food insecurity. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&quot;The exclusion of APL families from the food law is understood as the government is already struggling to deal with the swelling BPL numbers in the wake of the Tendulkar Committee report,&quot; said sources. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">According to estimates, funding the &quot;food for all&quot; scheme would imply a cost of over Rs 45,000 crore under the current policies and figures. And if the Tendulkar Committee's 38% BPL figure is taken, the cost to the exchequer for running the scheme will be of the order of Rs 65,000 crore. If APL is also included under the food security law, the cost will around Rs 1,00,000 crore. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Orphans and street children are not expected to be covered under the food security law as the EGoM note has favoured that the issue of ensuring food for these groups could be covered by welfare institutions. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">However, the EGoM note has favoured continuation of the existing status of the Antyodya Anna Yojana, in which 35 kg of rice or wheat is provided to the poorest among the poor at a rate of Rs 2 per kg. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">It has been argued that along with the plan panel's estimate, the latest available census data could also be used to determine the actual BPL ceiling for each state and district. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The projected population figures of the Registrar General of India could be taken for the purpose of five-yearly review of the numerical ceiling. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&quot;There is also the need for a uniform methodology for identification of poor under various government programmes,'' said sources. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The plan panel argues that state-wise there were large variations in the BPL figures and if the 2009 population estimates were accepted, then the total number of poor families would come down to 5.91 crore families. <br /> </font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => '', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'H', 'category_id' => (int) 82, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'not-so-poor-families-may-not-fall-under-food-security-law-by-mahendra-kumar-singh-1290', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 1290, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 42168 $metaTitle = 'न्यूज क्लिपिंग्स् | Not-so-poor families may not fall under food security law by Mahendra Kumar Singh' $metaKeywords = null $metaDesc = ' Anxious to ensure fiscal discipline and manage financial resources for its flagship programmes, UPA-2 is considering deletion of the Above Poverty Line (APL) beneficiaries from the ambit of the proposed food security law. It seems garnering money for UPA's pet...' $disp = '<p align="justify"> <font >Anxious to ensure fiscal discipline and manage financial resources for its flagship programmes, UPA-2 is considering deletion of the Above Poverty Line (APL) beneficiaries from the ambit of the proposed food security law. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >It seems garnering money for UPA's pet promise of &quot;food for all&quot; is turning out to be a big headache as a note circulated for the Empowered Group of Ministers (EGoM) has argued in favour of mandating the states to stick to the BPL figures as estimated by the Planning Commission. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >Interestingly, the Suresh Tendulkar Committee which was set up to come out with fresh data on poverty had calculated the BPL number to be about 38% of the population. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >At the all-India level, the plan panel had calculated the BPL families to be around 36% in 1993-94, which it found had declined to 27.5% in 2004-05. The Commission's figure was contested by many state governments. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >The EGoM note argued that the Centre should be responsible for determining the number of the poor and the methodology for their identification. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >If the proposal gets the government's nod it will be mandatory under the law for states to adhere to poverty estimates of the Planning Commission. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >In what is going to be a tough call for the ministerial panel considering the political sensitivity and financial stakes involved, the note has opposed making any commitment in the proposed food law for providing foodgrains to the APL families and refused to identify the APL families with the index of food insecurity. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >&quot;The exclusion of APL families from the food law is understood as the government is already struggling to deal with the swelling BPL numbers in the wake of the Tendulkar Committee report,&quot; said sources. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >According to estimates, funding the &quot;food for all&quot; scheme would imply a cost of over Rs 45,000 crore under the current policies and figures. And if the Tendulkar Committee's 38% BPL figure is taken, the cost to the exchequer for running the scheme will be of the order of Rs 65,000 crore. If APL is also included under the food security law, the cost will around Rs 1,00,000 crore. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >Orphans and street children are not expected to be covered under the food security law as the EGoM note has favoured that the issue of ensuring food for these groups could be covered by welfare institutions. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >However, the EGoM note has favoured continuation of the existing status of the Antyodya Anna Yojana, in which 35 kg of rice or wheat is provided to the poorest among the poor at a rate of Rs 2 per kg. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >It has been argued that along with the plan panel's estimate, the latest available census data could also be used to determine the actual BPL ceiling for each state and district. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >The projected population figures of the Registrar General of India could be taken for the purpose of five-yearly review of the numerical ceiling. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >&quot;There is also the need for a uniform methodology for identification of poor under various government programmes,'' said sources. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >The plan panel argues that state-wise there were large variations in the BPL figures and if the 2009 population estimates were accepted, then the total number of poor families would come down to 5.91 crore families. <br /> </font> </p>' $lang = 'Hindi' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>news-clippings/not-so-poor-families-may-not-fall-under-food-security-law-by-mahendra-kumar-singh-1290.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>न्यूज क्लिपिंग्स् | Not-so-poor families may not fall under food security law by Mahendra Kumar Singh | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" Anxious to ensure fiscal discipline and manage financial resources for its flagship programmes, UPA-2 is considering deletion of the Above Poverty Line (APL) beneficiaries from the ambit of the proposed food security law. It seems garnering money for UPA's pet..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Not-so-poor families may not fall under food security law by Mahendra Kumar Singh</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p align="justify"> <font >Anxious to ensure fiscal discipline and manage financial resources for its flagship programmes, UPA-2 is considering deletion of the Above Poverty Line (APL) beneficiaries from the ambit of the proposed food security law. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >It seems garnering money for UPA's pet promise of "food for all" is turning out to be a big headache as a note circulated for the Empowered Group of Ministers (EGoM) has argued in favour of mandating the states to stick to the BPL figures as estimated by the Planning Commission. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >Interestingly, the Suresh Tendulkar Committee which was set up to come out with fresh data on poverty had calculated the BPL number to be about 38% of the population. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >At the all-India level, the plan panel had calculated the BPL families to be around 36% in 1993-94, which it found had declined to 27.5% in 2004-05. The Commission's figure was contested by many state governments. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >The EGoM note argued that the Centre should be responsible for determining the number of the poor and the methodology for their identification. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >If the proposal gets the government's nod it will be mandatory under the law for states to adhere to poverty estimates of the Planning Commission. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >In what is going to be a tough call for the ministerial panel considering the political sensitivity and financial stakes involved, the note has opposed making any commitment in the proposed food law for providing foodgrains to the APL families and refused to identify the APL families with the index of food insecurity. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >"The exclusion of APL families from the food law is understood as the government is already struggling to deal with the swelling BPL numbers in the wake of the Tendulkar Committee report," said sources. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >According to estimates, funding the "food for all" scheme would imply a cost of over Rs 45,000 crore under the current policies and figures. And if the Tendulkar Committee's 38% BPL figure is taken, the cost to the exchequer for running the scheme will be of the order of Rs 65,000 crore. If APL is also included under the food security law, the cost will around Rs 1,00,000 crore. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >Orphans and street children are not expected to be covered under the food security law as the EGoM note has favoured that the issue of ensuring food for these groups could be covered by welfare institutions. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >However, the EGoM note has favoured continuation of the existing status of the Antyodya Anna Yojana, in which 35 kg of rice or wheat is provided to the poorest among the poor at a rate of Rs 2 per kg. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >It has been argued that along with the plan panel's estimate, the latest available census data could also be used to determine the actual BPL ceiling for each state and district. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >The projected population figures of the Registrar General of India could be taken for the purpose of five-yearly review of the numerical ceiling. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >"There is also the need for a uniform methodology for identification of poor under various government programmes,'' said sources. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >The plan panel argues that state-wise there were large variations in the BPL figures and if the 2009 population estimates were accepted, then the total number of poor families would come down to 5.91 crore families. <br /> </font> </p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6800c96944e5e-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6800c96944e5e-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6800c96944e5e-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6800c96944e5e-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6800c96944e5e-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6800c96944e5e-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6800c96944e5e-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6800c96944e5e-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6800c96944e5e-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 42168, 'title' => 'Not-so-poor families may not fall under food security law by Mahendra Kumar Singh', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Anxious to ensure fiscal discipline and manage financial resources for its flagship programmes, UPA-2 is considering deletion of the Above Poverty Line (APL) beneficiaries from the ambit of the proposed food security law. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">It seems garnering money for UPA's pet promise of &quot;food for all&quot; is turning out to be a big headache as a note circulated for the Empowered Group of Ministers (EGoM) has argued in favour of mandating the states to stick to the BPL figures as estimated by the Planning Commission. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Interestingly, the Suresh Tendulkar Committee which was set up to come out with fresh data on poverty had calculated the BPL number to be about 38% of the population. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">At the all-India level, the plan panel had calculated the BPL families to be around 36% in 1993-94, which it found had declined to 27.5% in 2004-05. The Commission's figure was contested by many state governments. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The EGoM note argued that the Centre should be responsible for determining the number of the poor and the methodology for their identification. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">If the proposal gets the government's nod it will be mandatory under the law for states to adhere to poverty estimates of the Planning Commission. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In what is going to be a tough call for the ministerial panel considering the political sensitivity and financial stakes involved, the note has opposed making any commitment in the proposed food law for providing foodgrains to the APL families and refused to identify the APL families with the index of food insecurity. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&quot;The exclusion of APL families from the food law is understood as the government is already struggling to deal with the swelling BPL numbers in the wake of the Tendulkar Committee report,&quot; said sources. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">According to estimates, funding the &quot;food for all&quot; scheme would imply a cost of over Rs 45,000 crore under the current policies and figures. And if the Tendulkar Committee's 38% BPL figure is taken, the cost to the exchequer for running the scheme will be of the order of Rs 65,000 crore. If APL is also included under the food security law, the cost will around Rs 1,00,000 crore. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Orphans and street children are not expected to be covered under the food security law as the EGoM note has favoured that the issue of ensuring food for these groups could be covered by welfare institutions. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">However, the EGoM note has favoured continuation of the existing status of the Antyodya Anna Yojana, in which 35 kg of rice or wheat is provided to the poorest among the poor at a rate of Rs 2 per kg. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">It has been argued that along with the plan panel's estimate, the latest available census data could also be used to determine the actual BPL ceiling for each state and district. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The projected population figures of the Registrar General of India could be taken for the purpose of five-yearly review of the numerical ceiling. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&quot;There is also the need for a uniform methodology for identification of poor under various government programmes,'' said sources. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The plan panel argues that state-wise there were large variations in the BPL figures and if the 2009 population estimates were accepted, then the total number of poor families would come down to 5.91 crore families. <br /> </font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => '', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'H', 'category_id' => (int) 82, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'not-so-poor-families-may-not-fall-under-food-security-law-by-mahendra-kumar-singh-1290', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 1290, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [[maximum depth reached]], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 42168, 'metaTitle' => 'न्यूज क्लिपिंग्स् | Not-so-poor families may not fall under food security law by Mahendra Kumar Singh', 'metaKeywords' => null, 'metaDesc' => ' Anxious to ensure fiscal discipline and manage financial resources for its flagship programmes, UPA-2 is considering deletion of the Above Poverty Line (APL) beneficiaries from the ambit of the proposed food security law. It seems garnering money for UPA's pet...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"> <font >Anxious to ensure fiscal discipline and manage financial resources for its flagship programmes, UPA-2 is considering deletion of the Above Poverty Line (APL) beneficiaries from the ambit of the proposed food security law. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >It seems garnering money for UPA's pet promise of &quot;food for all&quot; is turning out to be a big headache as a note circulated for the Empowered Group of Ministers (EGoM) has argued in favour of mandating the states to stick to the BPL figures as estimated by the Planning Commission. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >Interestingly, the Suresh Tendulkar Committee which was set up to come out with fresh data on poverty had calculated the BPL number to be about 38% of the population. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >At the all-India level, the plan panel had calculated the BPL families to be around 36% in 1993-94, which it found had declined to 27.5% in 2004-05. The Commission's figure was contested by many state governments. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >The EGoM note argued that the Centre should be responsible for determining the number of the poor and the methodology for their identification. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >If the proposal gets the government's nod it will be mandatory under the law for states to adhere to poverty estimates of the Planning Commission. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >In what is going to be a tough call for the ministerial panel considering the political sensitivity and financial stakes involved, the note has opposed making any commitment in the proposed food law for providing foodgrains to the APL families and refused to identify the APL families with the index of food insecurity. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >&quot;The exclusion of APL families from the food law is understood as the government is already struggling to deal with the swelling BPL numbers in the wake of the Tendulkar Committee report,&quot; said sources. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >According to estimates, funding the &quot;food for all&quot; scheme would imply a cost of over Rs 45,000 crore under the current policies and figures. And if the Tendulkar Committee's 38% BPL figure is taken, the cost to the exchequer for running the scheme will be of the order of Rs 65,000 crore. If APL is also included under the food security law, the cost will around Rs 1,00,000 crore. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >Orphans and street children are not expected to be covered under the food security law as the EGoM note has favoured that the issue of ensuring food for these groups could be covered by welfare institutions. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >However, the EGoM note has favoured continuation of the existing status of the Antyodya Anna Yojana, in which 35 kg of rice or wheat is provided to the poorest among the poor at a rate of Rs 2 per kg. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >It has been argued that along with the plan panel's estimate, the latest available census data could also be used to determine the actual BPL ceiling for each state and district. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >The projected population figures of the Registrar General of India could be taken for the purpose of five-yearly review of the numerical ceiling. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >&quot;There is also the need for a uniform methodology for identification of poor under various government programmes,'' said sources. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >The plan panel argues that state-wise there were large variations in the BPL figures and if the 2009 population estimates were accepted, then the total number of poor families would come down to 5.91 crore families. <br /> </font> </p>', 'lang' => 'Hindi', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 42168, 'title' => 'Not-so-poor families may not fall under food security law by Mahendra Kumar Singh', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Anxious to ensure fiscal discipline and manage financial resources for its flagship programmes, UPA-2 is considering deletion of the Above Poverty Line (APL) beneficiaries from the ambit of the proposed food security law. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">It seems garnering money for UPA's pet promise of &quot;food for all&quot; is turning out to be a big headache as a note circulated for the Empowered Group of Ministers (EGoM) has argued in favour of mandating the states to stick to the BPL figures as estimated by the Planning Commission. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Interestingly, the Suresh Tendulkar Committee which was set up to come out with fresh data on poverty had calculated the BPL number to be about 38% of the population. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">At the all-India level, the plan panel had calculated the BPL families to be around 36% in 1993-94, which it found had declined to 27.5% in 2004-05. The Commission's figure was contested by many state governments. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The EGoM note argued that the Centre should be responsible for determining the number of the poor and the methodology for their identification. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">If the proposal gets the government's nod it will be mandatory under the law for states to adhere to poverty estimates of the Planning Commission. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In what is going to be a tough call for the ministerial panel considering the political sensitivity and financial stakes involved, the note has opposed making any commitment in the proposed food law for providing foodgrains to the APL families and refused to identify the APL families with the index of food insecurity. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&quot;The exclusion of APL families from the food law is understood as the government is already struggling to deal with the swelling BPL numbers in the wake of the Tendulkar Committee report,&quot; said sources. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">According to estimates, funding the &quot;food for all&quot; scheme would imply a cost of over Rs 45,000 crore under the current policies and figures. And if the Tendulkar Committee's 38% BPL figure is taken, the cost to the exchequer for running the scheme will be of the order of Rs 65,000 crore. If APL is also included under the food security law, the cost will around Rs 1,00,000 crore. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Orphans and street children are not expected to be covered under the food security law as the EGoM note has favoured that the issue of ensuring food for these groups could be covered by welfare institutions. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">However, the EGoM note has favoured continuation of the existing status of the Antyodya Anna Yojana, in which 35 kg of rice or wheat is provided to the poorest among the poor at a rate of Rs 2 per kg. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">It has been argued that along with the plan panel's estimate, the latest available census data could also be used to determine the actual BPL ceiling for each state and district. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The projected population figures of the Registrar General of India could be taken for the purpose of five-yearly review of the numerical ceiling. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&quot;There is also the need for a uniform methodology for identification of poor under various government programmes,'' said sources. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The plan panel argues that state-wise there were large variations in the BPL figures and if the 2009 population estimates were accepted, then the total number of poor families would come down to 5.91 crore families. <br /> </font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => '', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'H', 'category_id' => (int) 82, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'not-so-poor-families-may-not-fall-under-food-security-law-by-mahendra-kumar-singh-1290', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 1290, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 42168 $metaTitle = 'न्यूज क्लिपिंग्स् | Not-so-poor families may not fall under food security law by Mahendra Kumar Singh' $metaKeywords = null $metaDesc = ' Anxious to ensure fiscal discipline and manage financial resources for its flagship programmes, UPA-2 is considering deletion of the Above Poverty Line (APL) beneficiaries from the ambit of the proposed food security law. It seems garnering money for UPA's pet...' $disp = '<p align="justify"> <font >Anxious to ensure fiscal discipline and manage financial resources for its flagship programmes, UPA-2 is considering deletion of the Above Poverty Line (APL) beneficiaries from the ambit of the proposed food security law. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >It seems garnering money for UPA's pet promise of &quot;food for all&quot; is turning out to be a big headache as a note circulated for the Empowered Group of Ministers (EGoM) has argued in favour of mandating the states to stick to the BPL figures as estimated by the Planning Commission. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >Interestingly, the Suresh Tendulkar Committee which was set up to come out with fresh data on poverty had calculated the BPL number to be about 38% of the population. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >At the all-India level, the plan panel had calculated the BPL families to be around 36% in 1993-94, which it found had declined to 27.5% in 2004-05. The Commission's figure was contested by many state governments. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >The EGoM note argued that the Centre should be responsible for determining the number of the poor and the methodology for their identification. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >If the proposal gets the government's nod it will be mandatory under the law for states to adhere to poverty estimates of the Planning Commission. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >In what is going to be a tough call for the ministerial panel considering the political sensitivity and financial stakes involved, the note has opposed making any commitment in the proposed food law for providing foodgrains to the APL families and refused to identify the APL families with the index of food insecurity. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >&quot;The exclusion of APL families from the food law is understood as the government is already struggling to deal with the swelling BPL numbers in the wake of the Tendulkar Committee report,&quot; said sources. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >According to estimates, funding the &quot;food for all&quot; scheme would imply a cost of over Rs 45,000 crore under the current policies and figures. And if the Tendulkar Committee's 38% BPL figure is taken, the cost to the exchequer for running the scheme will be of the order of Rs 65,000 crore. If APL is also included under the food security law, the cost will around Rs 1,00,000 crore. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >Orphans and street children are not expected to be covered under the food security law as the EGoM note has favoured that the issue of ensuring food for these groups could be covered by welfare institutions. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >However, the EGoM note has favoured continuation of the existing status of the Antyodya Anna Yojana, in which 35 kg of rice or wheat is provided to the poorest among the poor at a rate of Rs 2 per kg. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >It has been argued that along with the plan panel's estimate, the latest available census data could also be used to determine the actual BPL ceiling for each state and district. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >The projected population figures of the Registrar General of India could be taken for the purpose of five-yearly review of the numerical ceiling. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >&quot;There is also the need for a uniform methodology for identification of poor under various government programmes,'' said sources. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >The plan panel argues that state-wise there were large variations in the BPL figures and if the 2009 population estimates were accepted, then the total number of poor families would come down to 5.91 crore families. <br /> </font> </p>' $lang = 'Hindi' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>news-clippings/not-so-poor-families-may-not-fall-under-food-security-law-by-mahendra-kumar-singh-1290.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>न्यूज क्लिपिंग्स् | Not-so-poor families may not fall under food security law by Mahendra Kumar Singh | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" Anxious to ensure fiscal discipline and manage financial resources for its flagship programmes, UPA-2 is considering deletion of the Above Poverty Line (APL) beneficiaries from the ambit of the proposed food security law. It seems garnering money for UPA's pet..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Not-so-poor families may not fall under food security law by Mahendra Kumar Singh</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p align="justify"> <font >Anxious to ensure fiscal discipline and manage financial resources for its flagship programmes, UPA-2 is considering deletion of the Above Poverty Line (APL) beneficiaries from the ambit of the proposed food security law. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >It seems garnering money for UPA's pet promise of "food for all" is turning out to be a big headache as a note circulated for the Empowered Group of Ministers (EGoM) has argued in favour of mandating the states to stick to the BPL figures as estimated by the Planning Commission. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >Interestingly, the Suresh Tendulkar Committee which was set up to come out with fresh data on poverty had calculated the BPL number to be about 38% of the population. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >At the all-India level, the plan panel had calculated the BPL families to be around 36% in 1993-94, which it found had declined to 27.5% in 2004-05. The Commission's figure was contested by many state governments. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >The EGoM note argued that the Centre should be responsible for determining the number of the poor and the methodology for their identification. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >If the proposal gets the government's nod it will be mandatory under the law for states to adhere to poverty estimates of the Planning Commission. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >In what is going to be a tough call for the ministerial panel considering the political sensitivity and financial stakes involved, the note has opposed making any commitment in the proposed food law for providing foodgrains to the APL families and refused to identify the APL families with the index of food insecurity. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >"The exclusion of APL families from the food law is understood as the government is already struggling to deal with the swelling BPL numbers in the wake of the Tendulkar Committee report," said sources. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >According to estimates, funding the "food for all" scheme would imply a cost of over Rs 45,000 crore under the current policies and figures. And if the Tendulkar Committee's 38% BPL figure is taken, the cost to the exchequer for running the scheme will be of the order of Rs 65,000 crore. If APL is also included under the food security law, the cost will around Rs 1,00,000 crore. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >Orphans and street children are not expected to be covered under the food security law as the EGoM note has favoured that the issue of ensuring food for these groups could be covered by welfare institutions. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >However, the EGoM note has favoured continuation of the existing status of the Antyodya Anna Yojana, in which 35 kg of rice or wheat is provided to the poorest among the poor at a rate of Rs 2 per kg. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >It has been argued that along with the plan panel's estimate, the latest available census data could also be used to determine the actual BPL ceiling for each state and district. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >The projected population figures of the Registrar General of India could be taken for the purpose of five-yearly review of the numerical ceiling. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >"There is also the need for a uniform methodology for identification of poor under various government programmes,'' said sources. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >The plan panel argues that state-wise there were large variations in the BPL figures and if the 2009 population estimates were accepted, then the total number of poor families would come down to 5.91 crore families. <br /> </font> </p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6800c96944e5e-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6800c96944e5e-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6800c96944e5e-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6800c96944e5e-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6800c96944e5e-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6800c96944e5e-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6800c96944e5e-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6800c96944e5e-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6800c96944e5e-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 42168, 'title' => 'Not-so-poor families may not fall under food security law by Mahendra Kumar Singh', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Anxious to ensure fiscal discipline and manage financial resources for its flagship programmes, UPA-2 is considering deletion of the Above Poverty Line (APL) beneficiaries from the ambit of the proposed food security law. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">It seems garnering money for UPA's pet promise of &quot;food for all&quot; is turning out to be a big headache as a note circulated for the Empowered Group of Ministers (EGoM) has argued in favour of mandating the states to stick to the BPL figures as estimated by the Planning Commission. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Interestingly, the Suresh Tendulkar Committee which was set up to come out with fresh data on poverty had calculated the BPL number to be about 38% of the population. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">At the all-India level, the plan panel had calculated the BPL families to be around 36% in 1993-94, which it found had declined to 27.5% in 2004-05. The Commission's figure was contested by many state governments. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The EGoM note argued that the Centre should be responsible for determining the number of the poor and the methodology for their identification. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">If the proposal gets the government's nod it will be mandatory under the law for states to adhere to poverty estimates of the Planning Commission. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In what is going to be a tough call for the ministerial panel considering the political sensitivity and financial stakes involved, the note has opposed making any commitment in the proposed food law for providing foodgrains to the APL families and refused to identify the APL families with the index of food insecurity. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&quot;The exclusion of APL families from the food law is understood as the government is already struggling to deal with the swelling BPL numbers in the wake of the Tendulkar Committee report,&quot; said sources. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">According to estimates, funding the &quot;food for all&quot; scheme would imply a cost of over Rs 45,000 crore under the current policies and figures. And if the Tendulkar Committee's 38% BPL figure is taken, the cost to the exchequer for running the scheme will be of the order of Rs 65,000 crore. If APL is also included under the food security law, the cost will around Rs 1,00,000 crore. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Orphans and street children are not expected to be covered under the food security law as the EGoM note has favoured that the issue of ensuring food for these groups could be covered by welfare institutions. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">However, the EGoM note has favoured continuation of the existing status of the Antyodya Anna Yojana, in which 35 kg of rice or wheat is provided to the poorest among the poor at a rate of Rs 2 per kg. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">It has been argued that along with the plan panel's estimate, the latest available census data could also be used to determine the actual BPL ceiling for each state and district. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The projected population figures of the Registrar General of India could be taken for the purpose of five-yearly review of the numerical ceiling. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&quot;There is also the need for a uniform methodology for identification of poor under various government programmes,'' said sources. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The plan panel argues that state-wise there were large variations in the BPL figures and if the 2009 population estimates were accepted, then the total number of poor families would come down to 5.91 crore families. <br /> </font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => '', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'H', 'category_id' => (int) 82, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'not-so-poor-families-may-not-fall-under-food-security-law-by-mahendra-kumar-singh-1290', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 1290, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [[maximum depth reached]], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 42168, 'metaTitle' => 'न्यूज क्लिपिंग्स् | Not-so-poor families may not fall under food security law by Mahendra Kumar Singh', 'metaKeywords' => null, 'metaDesc' => ' Anxious to ensure fiscal discipline and manage financial resources for its flagship programmes, UPA-2 is considering deletion of the Above Poverty Line (APL) beneficiaries from the ambit of the proposed food security law. It seems garnering money for UPA's pet...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"> <font >Anxious to ensure fiscal discipline and manage financial resources for its flagship programmes, UPA-2 is considering deletion of the Above Poverty Line (APL) beneficiaries from the ambit of the proposed food security law. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >It seems garnering money for UPA's pet promise of &quot;food for all&quot; is turning out to be a big headache as a note circulated for the Empowered Group of Ministers (EGoM) has argued in favour of mandating the states to stick to the BPL figures as estimated by the Planning Commission. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >Interestingly, the Suresh Tendulkar Committee which was set up to come out with fresh data on poverty had calculated the BPL number to be about 38% of the population. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >At the all-India level, the plan panel had calculated the BPL families to be around 36% in 1993-94, which it found had declined to 27.5% in 2004-05. The Commission's figure was contested by many state governments. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >The EGoM note argued that the Centre should be responsible for determining the number of the poor and the methodology for their identification. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >If the proposal gets the government's nod it will be mandatory under the law for states to adhere to poverty estimates of the Planning Commission. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >In what is going to be a tough call for the ministerial panel considering the political sensitivity and financial stakes involved, the note has opposed making any commitment in the proposed food law for providing foodgrains to the APL families and refused to identify the APL families with the index of food insecurity. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >&quot;The exclusion of APL families from the food law is understood as the government is already struggling to deal with the swelling BPL numbers in the wake of the Tendulkar Committee report,&quot; said sources. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >According to estimates, funding the &quot;food for all&quot; scheme would imply a cost of over Rs 45,000 crore under the current policies and figures. And if the Tendulkar Committee's 38% BPL figure is taken, the cost to the exchequer for running the scheme will be of the order of Rs 65,000 crore. If APL is also included under the food security law, the cost will around Rs 1,00,000 crore. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >Orphans and street children are not expected to be covered under the food security law as the EGoM note has favoured that the issue of ensuring food for these groups could be covered by welfare institutions. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >However, the EGoM note has favoured continuation of the existing status of the Antyodya Anna Yojana, in which 35 kg of rice or wheat is provided to the poorest among the poor at a rate of Rs 2 per kg. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >It has been argued that along with the plan panel's estimate, the latest available census data could also be used to determine the actual BPL ceiling for each state and district. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >The projected population figures of the Registrar General of India could be taken for the purpose of five-yearly review of the numerical ceiling. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >&quot;There is also the need for a uniform methodology for identification of poor under various government programmes,'' said sources. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >The plan panel argues that state-wise there were large variations in the BPL figures and if the 2009 population estimates were accepted, then the total number of poor families would come down to 5.91 crore families. <br /> </font> </p>', 'lang' => 'Hindi', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 42168, 'title' => 'Not-so-poor families may not fall under food security law by Mahendra Kumar Singh', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Anxious to ensure fiscal discipline and manage financial resources for its flagship programmes, UPA-2 is considering deletion of the Above Poverty Line (APL) beneficiaries from the ambit of the proposed food security law. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">It seems garnering money for UPA's pet promise of &quot;food for all&quot; is turning out to be a big headache as a note circulated for the Empowered Group of Ministers (EGoM) has argued in favour of mandating the states to stick to the BPL figures as estimated by the Planning Commission. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Interestingly, the Suresh Tendulkar Committee which was set up to come out with fresh data on poverty had calculated the BPL number to be about 38% of the population. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">At the all-India level, the plan panel had calculated the BPL families to be around 36% in 1993-94, which it found had declined to 27.5% in 2004-05. The Commission's figure was contested by many state governments. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The EGoM note argued that the Centre should be responsible for determining the number of the poor and the methodology for their identification. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">If the proposal gets the government's nod it will be mandatory under the law for states to adhere to poverty estimates of the Planning Commission. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In what is going to be a tough call for the ministerial panel considering the political sensitivity and financial stakes involved, the note has opposed making any commitment in the proposed food law for providing foodgrains to the APL families and refused to identify the APL families with the index of food insecurity. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&quot;The exclusion of APL families from the food law is understood as the government is already struggling to deal with the swelling BPL numbers in the wake of the Tendulkar Committee report,&quot; said sources. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">According to estimates, funding the &quot;food for all&quot; scheme would imply a cost of over Rs 45,000 crore under the current policies and figures. And if the Tendulkar Committee's 38% BPL figure is taken, the cost to the exchequer for running the scheme will be of the order of Rs 65,000 crore. If APL is also included under the food security law, the cost will around Rs 1,00,000 crore. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Orphans and street children are not expected to be covered under the food security law as the EGoM note has favoured that the issue of ensuring food for these groups could be covered by welfare institutions. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">However, the EGoM note has favoured continuation of the existing status of the Antyodya Anna Yojana, in which 35 kg of rice or wheat is provided to the poorest among the poor at a rate of Rs 2 per kg. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">It has been argued that along with the plan panel's estimate, the latest available census data could also be used to determine the actual BPL ceiling for each state and district. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The projected population figures of the Registrar General of India could be taken for the purpose of five-yearly review of the numerical ceiling. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&quot;There is also the need for a uniform methodology for identification of poor under various government programmes,'' said sources. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The plan panel argues that state-wise there were large variations in the BPL figures and if the 2009 population estimates were accepted, then the total number of poor families would come down to 5.91 crore families. <br /> </font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => '', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'H', 'category_id' => (int) 82, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'not-so-poor-families-may-not-fall-under-food-security-law-by-mahendra-kumar-singh-1290', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 1290, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 42168 $metaTitle = 'न्यूज क्लिपिंग्स् | Not-so-poor families may not fall under food security law by Mahendra Kumar Singh' $metaKeywords = null $metaDesc = ' Anxious to ensure fiscal discipline and manage financial resources for its flagship programmes, UPA-2 is considering deletion of the Above Poverty Line (APL) beneficiaries from the ambit of the proposed food security law. It seems garnering money for UPA's pet...' $disp = '<p align="justify"> <font >Anxious to ensure fiscal discipline and manage financial resources for its flagship programmes, UPA-2 is considering deletion of the Above Poverty Line (APL) beneficiaries from the ambit of the proposed food security law. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >It seems garnering money for UPA's pet promise of &quot;food for all&quot; is turning out to be a big headache as a note circulated for the Empowered Group of Ministers (EGoM) has argued in favour of mandating the states to stick to the BPL figures as estimated by the Planning Commission. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >Interestingly, the Suresh Tendulkar Committee which was set up to come out with fresh data on poverty had calculated the BPL number to be about 38% of the population. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >At the all-India level, the plan panel had calculated the BPL families to be around 36% in 1993-94, which it found had declined to 27.5% in 2004-05. The Commission's figure was contested by many state governments. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >The EGoM note argued that the Centre should be responsible for determining the number of the poor and the methodology for their identification. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >If the proposal gets the government's nod it will be mandatory under the law for states to adhere to poverty estimates of the Planning Commission. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >In what is going to be a tough call for the ministerial panel considering the political sensitivity and financial stakes involved, the note has opposed making any commitment in the proposed food law for providing foodgrains to the APL families and refused to identify the APL families with the index of food insecurity. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >&quot;The exclusion of APL families from the food law is understood as the government is already struggling to deal with the swelling BPL numbers in the wake of the Tendulkar Committee report,&quot; said sources. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >According to estimates, funding the &quot;food for all&quot; scheme would imply a cost of over Rs 45,000 crore under the current policies and figures. And if the Tendulkar Committee's 38% BPL figure is taken, the cost to the exchequer for running the scheme will be of the order of Rs 65,000 crore. If APL is also included under the food security law, the cost will around Rs 1,00,000 crore. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >Orphans and street children are not expected to be covered under the food security law as the EGoM note has favoured that the issue of ensuring food for these groups could be covered by welfare institutions. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >However, the EGoM note has favoured continuation of the existing status of the Antyodya Anna Yojana, in which 35 kg of rice or wheat is provided to the poorest among the poor at a rate of Rs 2 per kg. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >It has been argued that along with the plan panel's estimate, the latest available census data could also be used to determine the actual BPL ceiling for each state and district. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >The projected population figures of the Registrar General of India could be taken for the purpose of five-yearly review of the numerical ceiling. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >&quot;There is also the need for a uniform methodology for identification of poor under various government programmes,'' said sources. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >The plan panel argues that state-wise there were large variations in the BPL figures and if the 2009 population estimates were accepted, then the total number of poor families would come down to 5.91 crore families. <br /> </font> </p>' $lang = 'Hindi' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>news-clippings/not-so-poor-families-may-not-fall-under-food-security-law-by-mahendra-kumar-singh-1290.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>न्यूज क्लिपिंग्स् | Not-so-poor families may not fall under food security law by Mahendra Kumar Singh | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" Anxious to ensure fiscal discipline and manage financial resources for its flagship programmes, UPA-2 is considering deletion of the Above Poverty Line (APL) beneficiaries from the ambit of the proposed food security law. It seems garnering money for UPA's pet..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Not-so-poor families may not fall under food security law by Mahendra Kumar Singh</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p align="justify"> <font >Anxious to ensure fiscal discipline and manage financial resources for its flagship programmes, UPA-2 is considering deletion of the Above Poverty Line (APL) beneficiaries from the ambit of the proposed food security law. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >It seems garnering money for UPA's pet promise of "food for all" is turning out to be a big headache as a note circulated for the Empowered Group of Ministers (EGoM) has argued in favour of mandating the states to stick to the BPL figures as estimated by the Planning Commission. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >Interestingly, the Suresh Tendulkar Committee which was set up to come out with fresh data on poverty had calculated the BPL number to be about 38% of the population. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >At the all-India level, the plan panel had calculated the BPL families to be around 36% in 1993-94, which it found had declined to 27.5% in 2004-05. The Commission's figure was contested by many state governments. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >The EGoM note argued that the Centre should be responsible for determining the number of the poor and the methodology for their identification. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >If the proposal gets the government's nod it will be mandatory under the law for states to adhere to poverty estimates of the Planning Commission. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >In what is going to be a tough call for the ministerial panel considering the political sensitivity and financial stakes involved, the note has opposed making any commitment in the proposed food law for providing foodgrains to the APL families and refused to identify the APL families with the index of food insecurity. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >"The exclusion of APL families from the food law is understood as the government is already struggling to deal with the swelling BPL numbers in the wake of the Tendulkar Committee report," said sources. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >According to estimates, funding the "food for all" scheme would imply a cost of over Rs 45,000 crore under the current policies and figures. And if the Tendulkar Committee's 38% BPL figure is taken, the cost to the exchequer for running the scheme will be of the order of Rs 65,000 crore. If APL is also included under the food security law, the cost will around Rs 1,00,000 crore. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >Orphans and street children are not expected to be covered under the food security law as the EGoM note has favoured that the issue of ensuring food for these groups could be covered by welfare institutions. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >However, the EGoM note has favoured continuation of the existing status of the Antyodya Anna Yojana, in which 35 kg of rice or wheat is provided to the poorest among the poor at a rate of Rs 2 per kg. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >It has been argued that along with the plan panel's estimate, the latest available census data could also be used to determine the actual BPL ceiling for each state and district. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >The projected population figures of the Registrar General of India could be taken for the purpose of five-yearly review of the numerical ceiling. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >"There is also the need for a uniform methodology for identification of poor under various government programmes,'' said sources. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >The plan panel argues that state-wise there were large variations in the BPL figures and if the 2009 population estimates were accepted, then the total number of poor families would come down to 5.91 crore families. <br /> </font> </p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 42168, 'title' => 'Not-so-poor families may not fall under food security law by Mahendra Kumar Singh', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Anxious to ensure fiscal discipline and manage financial resources for its flagship programmes, UPA-2 is considering deletion of the Above Poverty Line (APL) beneficiaries from the ambit of the proposed food security law. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">It seems garnering money for UPA's pet promise of "food for all" is turning out to be a big headache as a note circulated for the Empowered Group of Ministers (EGoM) has argued in favour of mandating the states to stick to the BPL figures as estimated by the Planning Commission. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Interestingly, the Suresh Tendulkar Committee which was set up to come out with fresh data on poverty had calculated the BPL number to be about 38% of the population. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">At the all-India level, the plan panel had calculated the BPL families to be around 36% in 1993-94, which it found had declined to 27.5% in 2004-05. The Commission's figure was contested by many state governments. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The EGoM note argued that the Centre should be responsible for determining the number of the poor and the methodology for their identification. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">If the proposal gets the government's nod it will be mandatory under the law for states to adhere to poverty estimates of the Planning Commission. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In what is going to be a tough call for the ministerial panel considering the political sensitivity and financial stakes involved, the note has opposed making any commitment in the proposed food law for providing foodgrains to the APL families and refused to identify the APL families with the index of food insecurity. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">"The exclusion of APL families from the food law is understood as the government is already struggling to deal with the swelling BPL numbers in the wake of the Tendulkar Committee report," said sources. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">According to estimates, funding the "food for all" scheme would imply a cost of over Rs 45,000 crore under the current policies and figures. And if the Tendulkar Committee's 38% BPL figure is taken, the cost to the exchequer for running the scheme will be of the order of Rs 65,000 crore. If APL is also included under the food security law, the cost will around Rs 1,00,000 crore. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Orphans and street children are not expected to be covered under the food security law as the EGoM note has favoured that the issue of ensuring food for these groups could be covered by welfare institutions. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">However, the EGoM note has favoured continuation of the existing status of the Antyodya Anna Yojana, in which 35 kg of rice or wheat is provided to the poorest among the poor at a rate of Rs 2 per kg. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">It has been argued that along with the plan panel's estimate, the latest available census data could also be used to determine the actual BPL ceiling for each state and district. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The projected population figures of the Registrar General of India could be taken for the purpose of five-yearly review of the numerical ceiling. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">"There is also the need for a uniform methodology for identification of poor under various government programmes,'' said sources. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The plan panel argues that state-wise there were large variations in the BPL figures and if the 2009 population estimates were accepted, then the total number of poor families would come down to 5.91 crore families. <br /> </font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => '', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'H', 'category_id' => (int) 82, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'not-so-poor-families-may-not-fall-under-food-security-law-by-mahendra-kumar-singh-1290', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 1290, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [[maximum depth reached]], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 42168, 'metaTitle' => 'न्यूज क्लिपिंग्स् | Not-so-poor families may not fall under food security law by Mahendra Kumar Singh', 'metaKeywords' => null, 'metaDesc' => ' Anxious to ensure fiscal discipline and manage financial resources for its flagship programmes, UPA-2 is considering deletion of the Above Poverty Line (APL) beneficiaries from the ambit of the proposed food security law. It seems garnering money for UPA's pet...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"> <font >Anxious to ensure fiscal discipline and manage financial resources for its flagship programmes, UPA-2 is considering deletion of the Above Poverty Line (APL) beneficiaries from the ambit of the proposed food security law. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >It seems garnering money for UPA's pet promise of "food for all" is turning out to be a big headache as a note circulated for the Empowered Group of Ministers (EGoM) has argued in favour of mandating the states to stick to the BPL figures as estimated by the Planning Commission. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >Interestingly, the Suresh Tendulkar Committee which was set up to come out with fresh data on poverty had calculated the BPL number to be about 38% of the population. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >At the all-India level, the plan panel had calculated the BPL families to be around 36% in 1993-94, which it found had declined to 27.5% in 2004-05. The Commission's figure was contested by many state governments. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >The EGoM note argued that the Centre should be responsible for determining the number of the poor and the methodology for their identification. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >If the proposal gets the government's nod it will be mandatory under the law for states to adhere to poverty estimates of the Planning Commission. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >In what is going to be a tough call for the ministerial panel considering the political sensitivity and financial stakes involved, the note has opposed making any commitment in the proposed food law for providing foodgrains to the APL families and refused to identify the APL families with the index of food insecurity. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >"The exclusion of APL families from the food law is understood as the government is already struggling to deal with the swelling BPL numbers in the wake of the Tendulkar Committee report," said sources. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >According to estimates, funding the "food for all" scheme would imply a cost of over Rs 45,000 crore under the current policies and figures. And if the Tendulkar Committee's 38% BPL figure is taken, the cost to the exchequer for running the scheme will be of the order of Rs 65,000 crore. If APL is also included under the food security law, the cost will around Rs 1,00,000 crore. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >Orphans and street children are not expected to be covered under the food security law as the EGoM note has favoured that the issue of ensuring food for these groups could be covered by welfare institutions. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >However, the EGoM note has favoured continuation of the existing status of the Antyodya Anna Yojana, in which 35 kg of rice or wheat is provided to the poorest among the poor at a rate of Rs 2 per kg. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >It has been argued that along with the plan panel's estimate, the latest available census data could also be used to determine the actual BPL ceiling for each state and district. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >The projected population figures of the Registrar General of India could be taken for the purpose of five-yearly review of the numerical ceiling. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >"There is also the need for a uniform methodology for identification of poor under various government programmes,'' said sources. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >The plan panel argues that state-wise there were large variations in the BPL figures and if the 2009 population estimates were accepted, then the total number of poor families would come down to 5.91 crore families. <br /> </font> </p>', 'lang' => 'Hindi', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 42168, 'title' => 'Not-so-poor families may not fall under food security law by Mahendra Kumar Singh', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Anxious to ensure fiscal discipline and manage financial resources for its flagship programmes, UPA-2 is considering deletion of the Above Poverty Line (APL) beneficiaries from the ambit of the proposed food security law. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">It seems garnering money for UPA's pet promise of "food for all" is turning out to be a big headache as a note circulated for the Empowered Group of Ministers (EGoM) has argued in favour of mandating the states to stick to the BPL figures as estimated by the Planning Commission. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Interestingly, the Suresh Tendulkar Committee which was set up to come out with fresh data on poverty had calculated the BPL number to be about 38% of the population. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">At the all-India level, the plan panel had calculated the BPL families to be around 36% in 1993-94, which it found had declined to 27.5% in 2004-05. The Commission's figure was contested by many state governments. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The EGoM note argued that the Centre should be responsible for determining the number of the poor and the methodology for their identification. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">If the proposal gets the government's nod it will be mandatory under the law for states to adhere to poverty estimates of the Planning Commission. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In what is going to be a tough call for the ministerial panel considering the political sensitivity and financial stakes involved, the note has opposed making any commitment in the proposed food law for providing foodgrains to the APL families and refused to identify the APL families with the index of food insecurity. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">"The exclusion of APL families from the food law is understood as the government is already struggling to deal with the swelling BPL numbers in the wake of the Tendulkar Committee report," said sources. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">According to estimates, funding the "food for all" scheme would imply a cost of over Rs 45,000 crore under the current policies and figures. And if the Tendulkar Committee's 38% BPL figure is taken, the cost to the exchequer for running the scheme will be of the order of Rs 65,000 crore. If APL is also included under the food security law, the cost will around Rs 1,00,000 crore. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Orphans and street children are not expected to be covered under the food security law as the EGoM note has favoured that the issue of ensuring food for these groups could be covered by welfare institutions. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">However, the EGoM note has favoured continuation of the existing status of the Antyodya Anna Yojana, in which 35 kg of rice or wheat is provided to the poorest among the poor at a rate of Rs 2 per kg. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">It has been argued that along with the plan panel's estimate, the latest available census data could also be used to determine the actual BPL ceiling for each state and district. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The projected population figures of the Registrar General of India could be taken for the purpose of five-yearly review of the numerical ceiling. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">"There is also the need for a uniform methodology for identification of poor under various government programmes,'' said sources. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The plan panel argues that state-wise there were large variations in the BPL figures and if the 2009 population estimates were accepted, then the total number of poor families would come down to 5.91 crore families. <br /> </font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => '', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'H', 'category_id' => (int) 82, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'not-so-poor-families-may-not-fall-under-food-security-law-by-mahendra-kumar-singh-1290', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 1290, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 42168 $metaTitle = 'न्यूज क्लिपिंग्स् | Not-so-poor families may not fall under food security law by Mahendra Kumar Singh' $metaKeywords = null $metaDesc = ' Anxious to ensure fiscal discipline and manage financial resources for its flagship programmes, UPA-2 is considering deletion of the Above Poverty Line (APL) beneficiaries from the ambit of the proposed food security law. It seems garnering money for UPA's pet...' $disp = '<p align="justify"> <font >Anxious to ensure fiscal discipline and manage financial resources for its flagship programmes, UPA-2 is considering deletion of the Above Poverty Line (APL) beneficiaries from the ambit of the proposed food security law. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >It seems garnering money for UPA's pet promise of "food for all" is turning out to be a big headache as a note circulated for the Empowered Group of Ministers (EGoM) has argued in favour of mandating the states to stick to the BPL figures as estimated by the Planning Commission. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >Interestingly, the Suresh Tendulkar Committee which was set up to come out with fresh data on poverty had calculated the BPL number to be about 38% of the population. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >At the all-India level, the plan panel had calculated the BPL families to be around 36% in 1993-94, which it found had declined to 27.5% in 2004-05. The Commission's figure was contested by many state governments. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >The EGoM note argued that the Centre should be responsible for determining the number of the poor and the methodology for their identification. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >If the proposal gets the government's nod it will be mandatory under the law for states to adhere to poverty estimates of the Planning Commission. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >In what is going to be a tough call for the ministerial panel considering the political sensitivity and financial stakes involved, the note has opposed making any commitment in the proposed food law for providing foodgrains to the APL families and refused to identify the APL families with the index of food insecurity. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >"The exclusion of APL families from the food law is understood as the government is already struggling to deal with the swelling BPL numbers in the wake of the Tendulkar Committee report," said sources. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >According to estimates, funding the "food for all" scheme would imply a cost of over Rs 45,000 crore under the current policies and figures. And if the Tendulkar Committee's 38% BPL figure is taken, the cost to the exchequer for running the scheme will be of the order of Rs 65,000 crore. If APL is also included under the food security law, the cost will around Rs 1,00,000 crore. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >Orphans and street children are not expected to be covered under the food security law as the EGoM note has favoured that the issue of ensuring food for these groups could be covered by welfare institutions. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >However, the EGoM note has favoured continuation of the existing status of the Antyodya Anna Yojana, in which 35 kg of rice or wheat is provided to the poorest among the poor at a rate of Rs 2 per kg. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >It has been argued that along with the plan panel's estimate, the latest available census data could also be used to determine the actual BPL ceiling for each state and district. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >The projected population figures of the Registrar General of India could be taken for the purpose of five-yearly review of the numerical ceiling. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >"There is also the need for a uniform methodology for identification of poor under various government programmes,'' said sources. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font >The plan panel argues that state-wise there were large variations in the BPL figures and if the 2009 population estimates were accepted, then the total number of poor families would come down to 5.91 crore families. <br /> </font> </p>' $lang = 'Hindi' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Not-so-poor families may not fall under food security law by Mahendra Kumar Singh |
Anxious to ensure fiscal discipline and manage financial resources for its flagship programmes, UPA-2 is considering deletion of the Above Poverty Line (APL) beneficiaries from the ambit of the proposed food security law. It seems garnering money for UPA's pet promise of "food for all" is turning out to be a big headache as a note circulated for the Empowered Group of Ministers (EGoM) has argued in favour of mandating the states to stick to the BPL figures as estimated by the Planning Commission. Interestingly, the Suresh Tendulkar Committee which was set up to come out with fresh data on poverty had calculated the BPL number to be about 38% of the population. At the all-India level, the plan panel had calculated the BPL families to be around 36% in 1993-94, which it found had declined to 27.5% in 2004-05. The Commission's figure was contested by many state governments. The EGoM note argued that the Centre should be responsible for determining the number of the poor and the methodology for their identification. If the proposal gets the government's nod it will be mandatory under the law for states to adhere to poverty estimates of the Planning Commission. In what is going to be a tough call for the ministerial panel considering the political sensitivity and financial stakes involved, the note has opposed making any commitment in the proposed food law for providing foodgrains to the APL families and refused to identify the APL families with the index of food insecurity. "The exclusion of APL families from the food law is understood as the government is already struggling to deal with the swelling BPL numbers in the wake of the Tendulkar Committee report," said sources. According to estimates, funding the "food for all" scheme would imply a cost of over Rs 45,000 crore under the current policies and figures. And if the Tendulkar Committee's 38% BPL figure is taken, the cost to the exchequer for running the scheme will be of the order of Rs 65,000 crore. If APL is also included under the food security law, the cost will around Rs 1,00,000 crore. Orphans and street children are not expected to be covered under the food security law as the EGoM note has favoured that the issue of ensuring food for these groups could be covered by welfare institutions. However, the EGoM note has favoured continuation of the existing status of the Antyodya Anna Yojana, in which 35 kg of rice or wheat is provided to the poorest among the poor at a rate of Rs 2 per kg. It has been argued that along with the plan panel's estimate, the latest available census data could also be used to determine the actual BPL ceiling for each state and district. The projected population figures of the Registrar General of India could be taken for the purpose of five-yearly review of the numerical ceiling. "There is also the need for a uniform methodology for identification of poor under various government programmes,'' said sources.
The plan panel argues that state-wise there were large variations in the BPL figures and if the 2009 population estimates were accepted, then the total number of poor families would come down to 5.91 crore families. |