Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'hunger-hdi/public-health-51/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/hunger-hdi/public-health-51/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'hunger-hdi/public-health-51/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/hunger-hdi/public-health-51/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681e4619ea796-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681e4619ea796-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr681e4619ea796-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681e4619ea796-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681e4619ea796-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681e4619ea796-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681e4619ea796-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr681e4619ea796-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr681e4619ea796-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 21, 'title' => 'Public Health', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">KEY TRENDS&nbsp;</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <div style="text-align:justify">&bull; The 2019&nbsp;India&nbsp;TB&nbsp;report&nbsp;says&nbsp;that the&nbsp;country&nbsp;accounted for a quarter of the global tuberculosis (TB) burden with an estimated 27 lakh cases in 2018. In 2018, the country was able to achieve a total notification of 21.5 lakh TB cases, of which 25 percent was from private sector. Majority of the TB burden is among the working age group. Nearly 89 percent of TB cases came from the age group 15-69 years. About 2/3rd of the TB patients were males <strong>*15</strong></div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&bull; Maternal Mortality Ratio for India was 370 in 2000, 286 in 2005, 210 in&nbsp; 2010, 158 in 2015 and 145 in 2017. Therefore, the MMRatio for the country reduced by almost 61 percent between 2000 and 2017. MMRatio for China was 59 in 2000, 44 in 2005, 36 in 2010, 30 in 2015 and 29 in 2017. Therefore, the MMRatio for China fell by around 51 percent between 2000 and 2017 <strong>*14</strong> &nbsp;<br /> &nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&bull; The per capita public expenditure (actual) on health in nominal terms has gone up from Rs. 621 in 2009-10 to Rs. 1,112 in 2015-16. Public expenditure on health (includes health sector expenditure by Centre and States/UTs) as a percentage of GDP was 1.02 percent in 2015-16. There is no significant change in public expenditure on health as a percentage of GDP since 2009-10. The Centre-State share in total public expenditure on health was 31:69 in 2015-16, which used to be 36:64 in 2009-10 <strong>*13</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; The North-Eastern states had the highest (viz. Rs. 2,878 per capita) and Empowered Action Group (EAG) states (including Assam) had the lowest (viz. Rs. 871 per capita) average per capita public expenditure on health in 2015-16 (excluding UTs). The North-Eastern states had the highest public health expenditure as a percentage of Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP) in 2015-16 (2.76 percent). Public health expenditure as a percentage of GSDP stood at 1.36 percent for EAG states (including Assam) and 0.76 percent for major non-EAG states <strong>*13</strong></div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&bull; Of the total disease burden in India in 1990, a tenth was caused by a group of risks including unhealthy diet, high blood pressure, high blood sugar, high cholesterol, and overweight, which mainly contribute to ischaemic heart disease, stroke, and diabetes. The contribution of this group of risks increased massively to a quarter of the total disease burden in India in 2016 <strong>*12</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; The Out-of-Pocket Expenditure (OOPE) on health by households is Rs. 3,02,425 crores (62.6 percent of total health expenditure, 2.4 percent of GDP, Rs. 2,394 per capita) for the year 2014-15. Private Health Insurance expenditure is Rs. 17,755 crores (3.7 percent of total health expenditure) for the year 2014-15 <strong>*11</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; Based on available evidence, cardiovascular disease (24 percent), chronic respiratory disease (11 percent), cancer (6 percent) and diabetes (2 percent) are the leading cause of mortality in India <strong>*10</strong><br /> &nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&bull; The total number of dengue cases in India has grown from 28,292 in 2010 to 40,425 in 2014. The total number of dengue related deaths stood at 131 in 2014 <strong>*10</strong></div> <div style="text-align:justify"><br /> &bull; The Proportion (per 1000) of Ailing Persons (PAP), measured as the number of living persons reporting ailments (per 1000 persons), was 89 persons in rural India and 118 persons in urban India <strong>*9</strong><br /> &nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&bull; Private doctors were the most important single source of non-hospitalized treatment in both the sectors (Rural &amp; Urban). More than 70% (72 per cent in the rural areas and 79 per cent in the urban areas) spells of ailment were treated in the private sector (consisting of private doctors, nursing homes, private hospitals, charitable institutions, etc.) <strong>*9</strong></div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&bull; It is observed that in rural India, 42 percent hospitalised treatment was carried out in public hospital and rest 58 percent in private hospital. For the urban India, the corresponding figures were 32 percent and 68 percent. It may be noted in this context that households (or persons within households) were segregated in sector (rural/urban) by their place of domicile, and not by the place of treatment <strong>*9</strong></div> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <div style="text-align:justify">&bull; Average medical expenditure per hospitalisation case: Higher amount was spent for treatment per hospitalised case by people in the private hospitals (Rs. 25850) than in the public hospitals (Rs. 6120). The highest expenditure was recorded for treatment of Cancer (Rs. 56712) followed by that for Cardio-vascular diseases (Rs. 31647). Average medical expenditure per non-hospitalisation case was Rs. 509 in rural India and Rs. 639 in urban India <strong>*9</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; As much as 86 percent of rural population and 82 percent of urban population were still not covered under any scheme of health expenditure support. Government, however, was able to bring about 12 percent urban and 13 percent rural population under health protection coverage through Rastriya Swasthya Bima Yojana (RSBY) or similar plan. Only 12 percent households of the 5th quintile class (Usual Monthly Per Capita Consumer Expenditure) of urban area had some arrangement of medical insurance from private provider <strong>*9</strong></div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&bull; The draft National Health Policy 2015 proposes a potentially achievable target of raising public health expenditure to 2.5% of the GDP. It also notes that 40% of this would need to come from Central expenditures. At current prices, a target of 2.5% of GDP translates to Rs. 3800 per capita, representing an almost four fold increase in five years <strong>*8</strong><br /> &nbsp;<br /> &bull; Maternal mortality ratio (MMR)* in India stood at 560 maternal deaths (per 100000 live births) during 1990, 460 during 1995, 370 during 2000, 280 during 2005 and 190 during 2013. India could reduce MMR by 65 percent between 1990 and 2013<strong> *7</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; At the country level, the two countries that accounted for one third of all global maternal deaths are India at 17 percent (50000) and Nigeria at 14 percent (40000)<strong> *7</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; U5MR in India declined by 55 percent from 126 in 1990 to 56 in 2012. Infant Mortality Rate declined from 88 in 1990 to 44 in 2012. Neonatal mortality rate declined from 51 in 1990 to 31 in 2012. U5MR in India among boys declined from 121 in 1990 to 54 in 2012. U5MR in India among girls declined from 130 in 1990 to 59 in 2012. The share of neonatal deaths in under-five deaths stood at 55 percent in 2012 as compared to 41 percent in 1990 <strong>*6</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; Pneumonia is the leading cause of child mortality in India, responsible for the deaths of nearly 400,000 children under five in 2010 <strong>*5</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; The Indian Commission on Macroeconomics and Health notes that, in India, 13 household person-days per patient were lost per episode of malaria. Furthermore, the commission estimated that the overall monetary losses to families (income losses together with treatment expenses) could amount to between 200 and 400 Indian rupees (US$ 3.5 to 7) <strong>*4</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; Odisha is one of the most highly malaria-endemic states in India, accounting for 24% of reported cases in 2010 despite consisting of less of than 4% of the national population. Malaria is particularly common among tribal groups which represent 44% of the population of Orissa <strong>*4</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; Globally 12% of all deaths among adults aged 30 years and over were attributed to tobacco as compared with 16% in India, 17% in Pakistan and 31% in Bangladesh <strong>*3</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; A recent study illustrated the economic impact of Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs) in India by estimating that if NCDs like: heart disease, cancer, diabetes, chronic respiratory conditions, and other NCDs were &ldquo;eliminated&rdquo;, the country&rsquo;s 2004 GDP would have been 4 to 10 percent greater<strong> *2</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; The share of out-of-pocket household health expenditures on NCDs in India increased from 32 percent to 47 percent between 1995&ndash;1996 and 2004. Moreover, 40 percent of these expenditures were financed by borrowing and sales of assets, increasing the household&rsquo;s financial vulnerability<strong> *2</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; In NFHS-III, 62% of women with two daughters and no sons say they want no more children, compared with 47% in NFHS-II<strong> *1</strong></div> <div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify"><strong>15.</strong> 2019 India TB report, released in 2019, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, please <a href="https://tbcindia.gov.in/WriteReadData/India%20TB%20Report%202019.pdf">click here</a> and <a href="https://tbcindia.gov.in/index1.php?lang=1&amp;level=1&amp;sublinkid=4160&amp;lid=2807">click here</a> to access</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify"><strong>14.</strong> Trends in Maternal Mortality 2000 to 2017: Estimates by World Health Orgnization (WHO), United Nations Children&#39;s Fund (UNICEF), World Bank Group, United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) and the United Nations Population Division (released in September 2019), please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Maternal%20mortality%20Levels%20and%20trends%202000%20to%202017%20Executive%20Summary.pdf" title="Maternal mortality Levels and trends 2000 to 2017 Executive Summary">click here</a> and <a href="https://www.unfpa.org/featured-publication/trends-maternal-mortality-2000-2017">click here</a> to access</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify"><strong>13</strong>. National Health Profile 2018, 13th Issue, Central Bureau of Health Intelligence, Ministry of Health &amp; Family Welfare, please <a href="https://im4change.org/docs/900National%20Health%20Profile%202018%2013th%20Issue%20Central%20Bureau%20of%20Health%20Intelligence%20Ministry%20of%20Health%20&amp;%20Family%20Welfare.pdf">click here</a> to access&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify"><strong>12. </strong>India: Health of the Nation&rsquo;s States - The India State-Level Disease Burden Initiative, Disease Burden Trends in the States of India 1990 to 2016 (released in October, 2017), prepared by Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), Public Health Foundation of India (PHFI), Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) and Ministry of Health &amp; Family Welfare (MoHFW), please <a href="https://im4change.org/docs/11592India_Health_of.pdf">click here</a> to access</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify"><strong>11</strong>. National Health Accounts: Estimates for India 2014-15 (released in October, 2017), prepared by the National Health Accounts Technical Secretariat, National Health Systems Resource Centre and Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/National%20Health%20Accounts%20Estimates%20Report%202014-15.pdf" title="National Health Accounts Estimates for India 2014-15">click here</a> to access</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify"><strong>10</strong>. National Health Profile 2015, Central Bureau of Health Intelligence, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (please <a href="http://www.cbhidghs.nic.in/E-Book%20HTML-2015/index.html">click here</a> to access)</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify"><strong>9</strong>. 71st round NSS report: Key Indicators of Social Consumption in India-Health (published in June 2015), please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/nss_71st_ki_health_30june15.pdf" title="NSS 71st Round Health">click here</a> to access the full report; please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/NSS%20Press%20Release%20Health.pdf" title="NSS Press Note Health">click here</a> to read the summary of findings</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify"><strong>8</strong>. Draft National Health Policy 2015 (published in December 2014), Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (Please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Draft%20National%20Health%20Policy%202015.pdf" title="Draft NHP 2015">click here</a> to download)</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>7</strong>. United Nations&#39; report (released in May, 2014) entitled Trends in maternal mortality estimates 1990 to 2013,&nbsp;</span>(please&nbsp;<a href="tinymce/uploaded/Trends%20in%20Maternal%20Mortality%201990%20to%202013.pdf" title="Trends in Maternal Mortality 1990 to 2013">click here</a>&nbsp;to download)</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><strong>6. </strong><a href="tinymce/uploaded/APR_Progress_Report_2013_9_Sept_2013_1.pdf">Committing to Child Survival</a>: A Promise Renewed Progress Report 2013, UNICEF </span></span></p> </div> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>5</strong>. Pneumonia Progress Report, 2012, released by IVAC and John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012.pdf" title="Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012">click here</a> to access</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>4</strong>. Defeating malaria in Asia, the Pacific, Americas, Middle East and Europe (2012), World Health Organization and PATH,&nbsp;</span></div> <p style="text-align:justify"><a href="http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Defeating%20malaria.pdf">http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Defeating%20malaria.pdf</a></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>3</strong>. WHO Global Report: Mortality Attributable to Tobacco (2012), please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/WHO%20report%20on%20Tobacco.pdf" title="WHO ">click here</a> to access&nbsp;&nbsp;</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>2</strong>. The Growing Danger of Non-Communicable Diseases: Acting Now to Reverse Course, September, 2011, The World Bank, please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/WBDeepeningCrisis.pdf" title="WBDeepeningCrisis">click here</a> to access</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>1</strong>. National Family Health Survey III (2005-06), please <a href="http://rchiips.org/NFHS/nfhs3.shtml">click here</a> to access &nbsp;</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The key findings of the [inside]Global Tuberculosis Report 2022 (released in October 2022)[/inside] by World Health Organization are as follows (please click <a href="/upload/files/Global%20Tuberculosis%20Report%202022.pdf">here</a> and <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022">here</a> to access):&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>India-specific findings</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The case notifications of people newly diagnosed with TB in India were 16,67,136 in 2015, 17,63,876 in 2016, 16,49,694 in 2017, 19,08,683 in 2018, 21,62,323 in 2019, 16,29,301 in 2020, and 19,65,444 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/covid-19-and-tb">click here</a> to access the data. &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Between 2019 and 2020, India witnessed a reduction of 24.65 percent in case notifications of people newly diagnosed with TB. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/covid-19-and-tb ">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Between 2019 and 2021, India faced a reduction of 9.1 percent in case notifications of people newly diagnosed with TB. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/covid-19-and-tb ">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Almost all (90 percent) of the global drop in the number of people newly diagnosed with TB and reported (notified) between 2019 and 2020 was accounted for by 10 countries; the top three, India, Indonesia and the Philippines, accounted for 67 percent. In 2021, 90 percent of the reduction compared with 2019 was accounted for by only five countries. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/covid-19-and-tb ">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Among the 30 high TB burden and 3 global TB watchlist countries, the largest relative reductions in annual notifications between 2019 and 2020 were (ordered according to the size of the relative reduction) in Philippines, Lesotho, Indonesia, Zimbabwe, India, Myanmar and Bangladesh (all &gt;20 percent). In 2021, there was considerable recovery in India, Indonesia and the Philippines, although not to 2019 levels. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/covid-19-and-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2021, eight countries accounted for more than two thirds of global TB cases: India (28 percent), Indonesia (9.2 percent), China (7.4 percent), the Philippines (7.0 percent), Pakistan (5.8 percent), Nigeria (4.4 percent), Bangladesh (3.6 percent) and Democratic Republic of the Congo (2.9 percent). Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-1-tb-incidence">click here</a> to access data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Trends in the TB incidence rate in the 30 high TB burden countries are mixed. Between 2020 and 2021, there were estimated increases in countries with major shortfalls in TB notifications in 2020 and 2021 (e.g. India, Indonesia, Myanmar, Philippines), while in others the previous decline in the TB incidence rate has slowed or stabilized. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-1-tb-incidence">click here</a> to access data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; TB incidence rates for India were 341 per lakh population in 2000, 340 per lakh population in 2001, 339 per lakh population in 2002, 337 per lakh population in 2003, 334 per lakh population in 2004, 329 per lakh population in 2005, 323 per lakh population in 2006, 316 per lakh population in 2007, 309 per lakh population in 2008, 300 per lakh population in 2009, 292 per lakh population in 2010, 284 per lakh population in 2011, 277 per lakh population in 2012, 270 per lakh population in 2013, 263 per lakh population in 2014, 256 per lakh population in 2015, 249 per lakh population in 2016, 234 per lakh population in 2017, 224 per lakh population in 2018, 214 per lakh population in 2019, 204 per lakh population in 2020, and 210 per lakh population in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-1-tb-incidence">click here</a> to access data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; TB case notification rates (of new and relapse cases) for India were 105 per lakh population in 2000, 101 per lakh population in 2001, 97 per lakh population in 2002, 96 per lakh population in 2003, 100 per lakh population in 2004, 100 per lakh population in 2005, 105 per lakh population in 2006, 109 per lakh population in 2007, 110 per lakh population in 2008, 110 per lakh population in 2009, 108 per lakh population in 2010, 105 per lakh population in 2011, 101 per lakh population in 2012, 96 per lakh population in 2013, 123 per lakh population in 2014, 126 per lakh population in 2015, 132 per lakh population in 2016, 122 per lakh population in 2017, 139 per lakh population in 2018, 156 per lakh population in 2019, 117 per lakh population in 2020, and 140 per lakh population in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-1-tb-incidence">click here</a> to access data. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2021, 82 percent of global TB deaths among HIV-negative people occurred in the WHO African and South-East Asia regions; India alone accounted for 36 percent. The African and South-East Asia regions accounted for 82 percent of the combined total of TB deaths in HIV-negative and HIV-positive people; India accounted for 32 percent. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-2-tb-mortality">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Trends in the number of TB deaths in the 30 high TB burden countries are mixed. Between 2019 and 2021, striking increases are estimated to have occurred in countries with major shortfalls in TB notifications in 2020 and 2021 (e.g. India, Indonesia, Myanmar, Philippines), while in others previous declines have slowed or stabilized. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-2-tb-mortality">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The estimated absolute numbers of TB deaths (HIV-positive and HIV-negative) in India were 7,10,000 in 2000, 7,00,000 in 2001, 6,90,000 in 2002, 6,70,000 in 2003, 6,50,000 in 2004, 6,40,000 in 2005, 6,30,000 in 2006, 6,30,000 in 2007, 5,90,000 in 2008, 5,80,000 in 2009, 5,50,000 in 2010, 5,40,000 in 2011, 5,30,000 in 2012, 5,20,000 in 2013, 4,90,000 in 2014, 4,70,000 in 2015, 4,60,000 in 2016, 4,60,000 in 2017, 4,60,000 in 2018, 4,50,000 in 2019, 4,80,000 in 2020, and 5,10,000 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-2-tb-mortality">click here</a> to access the data.<br /> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<br /> &bull; The estimated numbers of incident cases of Multidrug- and rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/RR-TB) were 1,49,000 in 2015, 1,44,000 in 2016, 1,35,000 in 2017, 129,000 in 2018, 123,000 in 2019, 1,17,000 in 2020, and 1,19,000 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-3-drug-resistant-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The countries with the largest share of incident cases of MDR/RR-TB in 2021 were India (26 percent of global cases), the Russian Federation (8.5 percent of global cases) and Pakistan (7.9 percent of global cases). Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-3-drug-resistant-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2019&ndash;2021, the first-ever national survey was completed in India; this was one of the largest surveys to date, with a sample size of about 3,20,000 people. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2.4-tb-prevalence-surveys">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2020, the first full year of the COVID-19 pandemic, there were particularly large absolute and relative reductions in India, Indonesia and Philippines, followed by some recovery in 2021.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The number&nbsp;of notifications of people newly diagnosed with TB (new and relapse cases, all forms) was 11,15,718 in 2000, 10,85,075 in 2001, 10,60,951 in 2002, 10,73,282 in 2003, 11,36,182 in 2004, 11,56,248 in 2005, 12,28,827 in 2006, 12,95,943 in 2007, 13,32,267 in 2008, 13,51,913 in 2009, 13,39,866 in 2010, 13,23,949 in 2011, 12,89,836 in 2012, 12,43,905 in 2013, 16,09,547 in 2014, 16,67,136 in 2015, 17,63,876 in 2016, 16,49,694 in 2017, 19,08,683 in 2018, 21,62,323 in 2019, 16,29,301 in 2020, and 19,65,444 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-1-case-notifications ">click here</a> to access the data. &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The number of estimated TB incident cases in India was 36,10,000 in 2000, 36,70,000 in 2001, 37,20,000 in 2002, 37,60,000 in 2003, 37,90,000 in 2004, 38,00,000 in 2005, 37,90,000 in 2006, 37,60,000 in 2007, 37,20,000 in 2008, 36,80,000 in 2009, 36,30,000 in 2010, 35,70,000 in 2011, 35,30,000 in 2012, 34,80,000 in 2013, 34,40,000 in 2014, 33,90,000 in 2015, 33,30,000 in 2016, 31,60,000 in 2017, 30,60,000 in 2018, 29,60,000 in 2019, 28,50,000 in 2020, and 29,50,000 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-1-case-notifications ">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The contribution of public-private mix (PPM) initiatives to total notifications was 2.3 percent in 2010, 0.26 percent in 2011, 0.24 percent in 2012, 6.0 percent in 2013, 12.0 percent in 2014, 11.0 percent in 2015, 17.0 percent in 2016, 23.0 percent in 2017, 26.0 percent in 2018, 28.0 percent in 2019, 31.0 percent in 2020, and 33.0 percent in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-1-case-notifications ">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The percentage of people in India newly diagnosed with pulmonary TB who were bacteriologically confirmed was 35 percent in 2000, 41 percent in 2001, 44 percent in 2002, 49 percent in 2003, 53 percent in 2004, 56 percent in 2005, 58 percent in 2006, 60 percent in 2007, 61 percent in 2008, 62 percent in 2009, 63 percent in 2010, 65 percent in 2011, 66 percent in 2012, 71 percent in 2013, 66 percent in 2014, 64 percent in 2015, 63 percent in 2016, 71 percent in 2017, 57 percent in 2018, 57 percent in 2019, 54 percent in 2020, and 66 percent in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-2-diagnostic-testing-for-tb--hiv-associated-tb-and-drug-resistant-tb">click here</a> to access the data</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The number of WHO-recommended rapid tests used per 1,00,000 population in the case of India was 258 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-2-diagnostic-testing-for-tb--hiv-associated-tb-and-drug-resistant-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The percentage of people in India initially tested for TB with a WHO-recommended rapid test who had a positive test was 24 percent in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-2-diagnostic-testing-for-tb--hiv-associated-tb-and-drug-resistant-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The number of WHO-recommended rapid diagnostic tests per person notified as a TB case (new and relapse cases, all forms) in India was 1.8 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-2-diagnostic-testing-for-tb--hiv-associated-tb-and-drug-resistant-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The estimated TB treatment coverage for India was 67 percent in 2021. The estimated TB treatment coverage among children aged 0&ndash;14 years for India was 32 percent in 2021. The estimated TB treatment coverage among children aged &gt;= 15 years for India was 71 percent in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-3-tb-treatment-and-treatment-coverage">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2021, ten countries accounted for 75 percent of the global gap between the estimated number of people who developed TB (incident TB cases) and the number of people who were detected with TB and officially reported. About 60 percent of the global gap was accounted for by five countries: India (24 percent), Indonesia (13 percent), the Philippines (10 percent), Pakistan (6.6 percent) and Nigeria (6.3 percent). Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-3-tb-treatment-and-treatment-coverage">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The estimated coverage of antiretroviral therapy for people living with HIV who developed TB for India 59 percent in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-3-tb-treatment-and-treatment-coverage">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The number of Indian people diagnosed with MDR/RR-TB was 3,288 in 2010, 4,297 in 2011, 17,253 in 2012, 18,888 in 2013, 25,748 in 2014, 28,876 in 2015, 37,258 in 2016, 39,009 in 2017, 58,347 in 2018, 66,255 in 2019, 49,679 in 2020, and 58,837 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-4-drug-resistant-tb-treatment">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The number of Indian people enrolled on MDR/RR-TB was 2,182 in 2010, 3,378 in 2011, 14,117 in 2012, 21,093 in 2013, 24,073 in 2014, 26,966 in 2015, 32,914 in 2016, 35,950 in 2017, 47,284 in 2018, 60,858 in 2019, 42,505 in 2020, and 53,037 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-4-drug-resistant-tb-treatment">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The number of Indian people enrolled on MDR/RR-TB was 2,182 in 2010, 3,378 in 2011, 14,117 in 2012, 21,093 in 2013, 24,073 in 2014, 26,966 in 2015, 32,914 in 2016, 35,950 in 2017, 47,284 in 2018, 60,858 in 2019, 42,505 in 2020, and 53,037 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-4-drug-resistant-tb-treatment">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The WHO regions with the best treatment coverage are the European Region and the Region of the Americas. Among the 30 high MDR/RR-TB burden countries, those with the best treatment coverage are 2021: Peru, the Russian Federation, Azerbaijan, the Republic of Moldova, India and Kazakhstan. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-4-drug-resistant-tb-treatment">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The estimated treatment coverage for MDR/RR-TB for India was 45 percent in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-4-drug-resistant-tb-treatment">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Seven countries (India, Nigeria, South Africa, Uganda, United Republic of Tanzania, Zambia and Zimbabwe) each reported initiating over 200 000 people with HIV on TB preventive treatment in 2021, accounting collectively for 82 percent of the 2.8 million reported globally. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-prevention">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Since 2014, spending on the diagnosis and treatment of drug-susceptible TB has fallen slightly. Spending on treatment of multidrug and rifampicin-resistant TB (MDR/RR-TB) has increased steadily since 2010: this growth is largely explained by trends in the BRICS group of countries (i.e., Brazil, Russian Federation, India, China and South Africa). Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/financing-for-tb">click here</a> to access the data. &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Bangladesh, Cambodia, China and Zambia are examples of high TB burden countries that have steadily increased domestic funding specifically allocated to NTPs (as opposed to funding allocated more generally for inpatient and outpatient care, including for people with TB) in recent years. There was a considerable reduction in domestic spending in India between 2020 and 2021; one explanation for this was less need for spending on second-line anti-TB drugs in 2021, given stocks that still existed from 2020. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/financing-for-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The international funding (at constant 2021 US$) for national TB programmes on TB prevention, diagnostic and treatment services was 37 million in 2010, 65 million in 2011, 61 million in 2012, 143 million in 2013, 92 million in 2014, 142 million in 2015, 135 million in 2016, 187 million in 2017, 170 million in 2018, 91 million in 2019, 85 million in 2020, and 154 million in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/financing-for-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The domestic funding (at constant 2021 US$) for national TB programmes on TB prevention, diagnostic and treatment services was 56 million in 2010, 60 million in 2011, 44 million in 2012, 85 million in 2013, 162 million in 2014, 132 million in 2015, 139 million in 2016, 305 million in 2017, 348 million in 2018, 365 million in 2019, 326 million in 2020, and 183 million in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/financing-for-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In the case of India, the sources of funding and funding gaps reported for the TB-specific budgets included in national strategic plans for TB were domestic funding: 66 percent, Global Fund: 29 percent, and international funding (excluding Global Fund): 4.9 percent in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/financing-for-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The distribution of the two UHC indicators in the 30 high TB burden countries and three global TB watchlist countries shows that, in general, values improve with income level; this is especially evident for the SCI. Nonetheless, the risk of catastrophic health expenditures is high (15 or above) in several middle-income countries, including Angola, Bangladesh, Cambodia, China, India, and Nigeria. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/uhc-tb-determinants/6.1-universal-health-coverage">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; To achieve Universal Health Coverage (UHC), substantial increases in investment in health are critical. From 2000 to 2019 there was a striking increase in health expenditure (from all sources) per capita in a few high TB burden countries, especially the upper-middle-income countries of Brazil, China, South Africa and Thailand. A steady upward trend was evident in Bangladesh, Ethiopia, India, Indonesia, Lesotho, Mongolia, Mozambique, the Philippines and Viet Nam, and there was a noticeable rise from 2012 to 2017 in Myanmar. Elsewhere, however, levels of spending have been relatively stable, and at generally much lower levels. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/uhc-tb-determinants/6.1-universal-health-coverage">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The current health expenditures per capita were US$ 86 in 2000, US$ 96 in 2001, US$ 99 in 2002, US$ 101 in 2003, US$ 109 in 2004, US$ 114 in 2005, US$ 119 in 2006, US$ 126 in 2007, US$ 131 in 2008, US$ 139 in 2009, US$ 141 in 2010, US$ 146 in 2011, US$ 162 in 2012, US$ 190 in 2013, US$ 189 in 2014, US$ 197 in 2015, US$ 205 in 2016, US$ 182 in 2017, US$ 196 in 2018, and US$ 211 in 2019.&nbsp;Kindly <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/uhc-tb-determinants/6.1-universal-health-coverage">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The estimated number of TB cases attributable to alcohol use disorders was 2,58,000, diabetes was 1,05,000, HIV was 93,000, smoking was 1,10,000 and undernourishment was 7,38,000 in 2021. Kindly <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/uhc-tb-determinants/6-3-tb-determinants">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Based on the latest available data in the World Bank database, some upper-middle-income and lower-middle-income countries (e.g. Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, Mongolia, South Africa, Thailand, and Viet Nam) appear to be performing relatively well. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/uhc-tb-determinants/6-3-tb-determinants">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Three new antigen-based skin tests for TB infection that perform better than tuberculin skin tests (particularly in terms of specificity) were evaluated and recommended by WHO in 2022; these are the Cy-Tb skin test, Serum Institute of India, India; C-TST, Anhui Zhifei Longcom Biopharmaceutical Co. Ltd, China; and Diaskintest, JSC Generium, Russian Federation. WHO plans to evaluate the following tests in the coming year: culture-free, targeted-sequencing solutions to test for drug resistance directly from sputum specimens; broth microdilution methods for drug-susceptibility testing (DST); and new IGRAs to test for TB infection. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-research-and-innovation">click here</a> to access the information.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In India, the Ministry of Health &amp; Family Welfare launched the 21-day TB Mukt Bharat Campaign at Ayushman Bharat Health and Wellness Centres (AB-HWCs), from 24 March to 14 April 2022. The campaign aimed to meaningfully engage community and civil society to build a people&rsquo;s movement to end TB. It was celebrated across 75 228 AB-HWCs; a total of 6 801 956 people were screened for TB, and 38 328 community awareness activities took place using 21 479 trained TB champions. Linked to this initiative, primary health care teams led by the newly introduced cadre of community health officers (CHOs) provide people-centred TB services to people&rsquo;s doorsteps. AB-HWCs are playing an important role in improving awareness, identifying TB symptoms at an early stage, offering treatment adherence and psychosocial support to individuals and families with TB, and creating a strong network of TB survivors to strengthen the TB response. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/featured-topics/civil-society-engagement">click here</a> to access the more information.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; WHO has been advancing MAF-TB efforts to strengthen the engagement of the private sector and other public care providers not linked to national TB programmes (NTPs) through a new initiative with the Bill &amp; Melinda Gates Foundation. The initiative promotes the development of enhanced PPM data dashboards in seven priority countries: Bangladesh, India, Indonesia, Kenya, Nigeria, Pakistan and the Philippines. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/featured-topics/maf-tb">click here</a> to get more information.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; India has developed a national multisectoral action framework for TB; this strategic document makes a strong case for transforming India&rsquo;s TB elimination efforts from a health sector struggle to a whole-of-society responsibility. The framework is a guide for policy-makers and a call to action for communities, civil society, the private sector, and other partners and stakeholders. The overarching goal is to strengthen the country&rsquo;s capacity for a multisectoral response that facilitates TB elimination by 2025, with the key objective being to achieve policy convergence and adopt a health-in-all approach. The framework highlights the six key strategic areas for integrated action: integrated health care service delivery; TB-free workplaces; socioeconomic support for patients; awareness generation and infection control; corporate social responsibility and investment in TB; and targeted intervention for key affected populations. It defines the list of government ministries and other stakeholders, and the strategic scope of collaboration with each of them. Also, the framework acknowledges the importance of resources for defined strategic areas (e.g. financing, capacity-building, technical resources and research), and calls on partners and governments to mobilize resources for its implementation. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/featured-topics/maf-tb">click here</a> to get more information.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The key findings of the report titled [inside]Rural Health Statistics 2020-21 (released in May 2022)[/inside], which has been prepared by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, are as follows (please <a href="/upload/files/Rural%20Health%20Statistics%202020-21.pdf">click here</a> to access):</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; As on 31st March, 2021, there were 1,56,101 and 1,718 Sub Centres (SCs), 25,140 and 5,439 Primary Health Centres (PHCs), and 5,481 and 470 Community Health Centres (CHCs), respectively, which were functioning in rural and urban areas of the country.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average rural population covered by a Sub Centre was 5,734 as on 1st July, 2021, whereas the norm is that one Sub Centre should be serving a population of size in the range 300-5,000.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average population in tribal/ hilly/ desert areas covered by a Sub Centre was 3,839 as on 1st July, 2021, whereas the norm is that one Sub Centre should be serving a population of size up to 3,000 in such areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; A Sub Centre is the most peripheral and first contact point between the primary health care system and the community. Sub Centres are assigned tasks relating to interpersonal communication in order to bring about behavioral change and provide services in relation to maternal and child health, family welfare, nutrition, immunisation, diarrhoea control and control of communicable diseases programmes. Each Sub Centre is required to be manned by at least one auxiliary nurse midwife (ANM) / female health worker and one male health worker. Under the National Rural Health Mission (NRHM), there is a provision for one additional second ANM on contract basis. One lady health visitor (LHV) is entrusted with the task of supervision of six Sub Centres. The Government of India bears the salary of ANM and LHV while the salary of the Male Health Worker is borne by the state governments.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average rural population covered by a Primary Health Centre (PHC) was 35,602 as on 1st July, 2021, whereas the norm is that one PHC should be serving a population of size in the range 20,000-30,000.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average population in tribal/ hilly/ desert areas covered by a PHC was 25,507 as on 1st July, 2021, whereas the norm is that one PHC should be serving a population of size up to 20,000 in such areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; PHC is the first contact point between the village community and the medical officer. The PHCs were envisaged to provide an integrated curative and preventive health care to the rural population with emphasis on preventive and promotive aspects of health care. The PHCs are established and maintained by the state governments under the Minimum Needs Programme (MNP)/ Basic Minimum Services (BMS) Programme. As per minimum requirement, a PHC is to be manned by a medical officer supported by 14 paramedical and other staff. Under NRHM, there is a provision for two additional staff nurses at PHCs on contract basis. It acts as a referral unit for 6 Sub Centres and has 4-6 beds for patients. The activities of PHC involve curative, preventive, promotive and family welfare services.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average rural population covered by a Community Health Centre (CHC) was 1,63,298 as on 1st July, 2021, whereas the norm is that one CHC should be serving a population of size in the range 80,000-1,20,000.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average population in tribal/ hilly/ desert areas covered by a CHC was 1,03,756 as on 1st July, 2021, whereas the norm is that one CHC should be serving a population of size up to 80,000 in such areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; CHCs are being established and maintained by the state government under Minimum Needs Program (MNP)/Basic Minimum Services (BMS) programme. As per minimum norms, a CHC is required to be manned by four medical specialists i.e. surgeon, physician, gynecologist and pediatrician supported by 21 paramedical and other staff. It has 30 indoor beds with one OT, X-ray, labour room and laboratory facilities. It serves as a referral centre for 4 PHCs and also provides facilities for obstetric care and specialist consultations.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Rural Health Care System in India</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Out of the sanctioned posts, a significant percentage of posts were vacant at all the levels. Nearly 21.1 percent of the sanctioned posts of Health Worker (Female)/ Auxiliary Nurse Midwife-ANM (at SCs and PHCs) were vacant as compared to 41.9 percent vacancies of Health Worker (Male) in 2021 at SCs. At PHCs, 64.2 percent of the sanctioned posts of Health Assistant (Male and Female) and 21.8 percent of the sanctioned posts of Doctors were vacant in 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The availability of manpower is one of the important prerequisites for the efficient functioning of the Rural Health services. As on 31st March, 2021, the overall shortfall (which excludes the existing surplus in some of the states) in the posts of Health Worker (Female) / ANM was 2.9 percent of the total requirement as per the norm of one HW(F)/ ANM per Sub Centre and PHC. The overall shortfall was mainly due to shortfall in states of Uttar Pradesh (1,871), Himachal Pradesh (1,253), Gujarat (616), Odisha (397), Tripura (380), and Uttarakhand (252).&nbsp;Similarly, in case of Health Worker (Male), there was a shortfall of 66.1 percent of the requirement. There was a vacancy of 21.1 percent for HW (Female)/ ANM (at SCs and PHCs) as compared to the sanctioned posts. There was a vacancy of 41.9 percent for Health Worker (Male) as compared to the sanctioned posts in 2021 at SCs. At PHCs, 64.2 percent of the sanctioned posts of Health Assistant (Male and Female) and 21.8 percent of the sanctioned posts of Doctors were vacant in 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; PHC is the first contact point between the village community and the Medical Officer. Manpower in PHC includes a Medical Officer supported by paramedical and other staff. In the case of PHC, for Health Assistant (male + female), the shortfall was 72.2 percent. For allopathic doctors at PHC, there was a shortfall of 4.3 percent of the total requirement at the national level. This happened due to a significant shortfall of doctors at PHCs in the states of Odisha (362), Karnataka (340), and Chhattisgarh (271).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The Community Health Centres provide specialised medical care of Surgeons, Obstetricians &amp; Gynecologists, Physicians and Pediatricians. The position of specialists manpower at CHCs as on 31st March, 2021 shows that out of the sanctioned posts, 72.3 percent of Surgeons, 64.2 percent of Obstetricians &amp; Gynecologists, 69.2 percent of physicians, and 67.1 percent of pediatricians were vacant. Overall 68 percent of the sanctioned posts of specialists at CHCs were vacant in rural areas. Moreover, as compared to requirements for existing infrastructure, there was a shortfall of 83.2 percent of Surgeons, 74.2 percent of Obstetricians &amp; Gynecologists, 82.2 percent of Physicians, and 80.6 percent of Pediatricians. Overall, there was a shortfall of 79.9 percent of specialists at the CHCs as compared to the requirement for existing CHCs. The shortfall of specialists was significantly high in most of the states. However, in addition to the specialists, about 17,012 General Duty Medical Officers (GDMOs) Allopathic and 514 AYUSH Specialists along with 2,955 GDMO AYUSH were also available at CHCs as on 31st March, 2021. In addition to this, there were 805 Anaesthetists and 289 Eye Surgeons available at CHCs as on 31st March, 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Comparison of the manpower position of major categories in 2021 with that in 2020 shows an overall increase in the number of ANMs at SCs &amp; PHCs and Doctors at PHCs during the period. However, there was a marginal decrease in the number of Specialists at CHCs. There was an increase of ANMs at SCs &amp; PHCs from 2,12,593 in 2020 to 2,14,820 in 2021 and Doctors at PHCs from 28,516 in 2020 to 31,716 in 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Considering the status of paramedical staff, there was an increase of Lab Technicians from 19,903 in 2020 to 22,723 in 2021 at PHCs and CHCs. There was an increase in the number of pharmacists from 25,792 in 2020 to 28,537 in 2021. A significant increase was also observed for nursing staff under PHC &amp; CHCs from 71,847 in 2020 to 79,044 in 2021. The number of radiographers decreased from 2,434 in 2020 to 2,418 in 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; A total of 1,224 Sub Divisional/ Sub District Hospitals were functioning as on 31st March, 2021 throughout the country. In these hospitals, 15,274 doctors were available. In addition to these doctors, nearly 42,073 paramedical staffs were also available at those hospitals as on 31st March, 2021. The number of doctors in Sub Divisional/ Sub District Hospitals increased from 13,399 in 2020 to 15,274 in 2021. The number of paramedical staff in Sub Divisional/ Sub District Hospitals also went up from 29,937 in 2020 to 42,073 in 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In addition to the above, 764 District Hospitals (DHs) were also functioning as on 31st March, 2021 throughout the country. There were 26,929 doctors available in the DHs. In addition to the doctors, roughly 90,435 paramedical staff were also available at District Hospitals as on 31st March, 2021. The number of doctors in District Hospitals went up from 22,827 in 2020 to 26,929 in 2021. The number of paramedical staff in District Hospitals increased from 80,920 in 2020 to 90,435 in 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The key findings of the report titled [inside]India TB Report 2022: Coming Together to End TB Altogether (released in March 2022)[/inside], which has been produced by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, are as follows (please <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/TB%20Annual%20Report%202022.pdf">click here</a> to access):&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; As per the Global TB Report 2021, the estimated incidence of all forms of TB in India for the year 2020 was 188 per 100,000 population (129-257 per 100,000 population).&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The total number of incident tuberculosis i.e., TB patients (new and relapse) notified during 2021 was 19,33,381 which was 19 percent higher than that of 2020 (16,28,161). The programme had been able to catch-up with the dip in TB notifications that was observed around the months when the two major covid waves happened in India.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The estimated incidence of all forms of TB in India as per Global TB report was 456 per lakh population in 2010, 437 per lakh population in 2011, 420 per lakh population in 2012, 404 per lakh population in 2013, 350 per lakh population in 2014, 328 per lakh population in 2015, 303 per lakh population in 2016, 286 per lakh population in 2017, 276 per lakh population in 2018, 266 per lakh population in 2019, and 257 per lakh population in 2020.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The estimated number of Multidrug-resistant (MDR) and Extensively drug-resistant (XDR) TB cases to have been put on treatment as per the global TB report 2021 was 4 per 100,000 and 1 per 100,000 population, respectively.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; During the pandemic, a significant reduction was observed in the total number of&nbsp;Drug-Resistant TB&nbsp;(DR-TB) patients started on treatment as compared to 2019. In 2020 and 2021, there was a reduction of 14 percent and 9 percent in the number MDR patients put on treatment as compared to the&nbsp;estimated numbers.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The estimated mortality rate among all forms of TB was 37 per 100,000 population (34-40 per 100,000 population) in 2020, as per the Global TB Report 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; There has been a slight increase in the mortality rate due to all forms of TB between 2019 and 2020 by 11 percent in the country.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In absolute numbers, the total number of estimated deaths from all forms of TB excluding HIV, for 2020 was 4.93 lakhs (4.53-5.36 lakhs) in the country, which was 13 percent higher that of the year 2019 estimate. &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; As per Nikshay, the total number of reported deaths among Drug sensitive (DS-TB) notified in 2020 was 76,002 (4.3 percent of the total notifications of 2020) which is 15.4 percent of the estimate for the country, thus emphasizing the importance of establishing a &ldquo;TB Death Surveillance and Response&rdquo; system in line with the maternal mortality surveillance to improve the coverage and real time resolution of lacunae including the system related factors.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; A recent systematic review (2020) estimating the direct&nbsp;and indirect patient costs of drug-sensitive and drug-resistant TB care in India reports that 7 to 32 percent of among DS-TB patients and 68 percent of DR-TB were experiencing catastrophic costs for TB care in India.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2021, among 21,35,830 patients diagnosed, 20,30,509 (95 percent) patients were put on treatment. 61 percent were male and 39 percent were female among the patients put on treatment.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Among the total notification, 6 percent patients were in paediatric age group. Among 17,51,437 TB patients notified in 2020, 83 percent were successfully treated while 4 percent died during treatment.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2021, 48,232 MDR/RR-TB patients were diagnosed and 43,380 (90 percent) were put on treatment. 8,455 Pre-XDR-TB, 376 XDR-TB and 13,724 H mono/poly patients were diagnosed and 7,562 (89 percent), 333 (89 percent) and 12,008 (87 percent) were put on treatment respectively.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; A total of 1939 patients were initiated on shorter oral Bdq-containing MDR/RR-TB regimen, 23,889 on longer M/XDR-TB regimen and 25,235 patients were initiated on shorter injection containing MDR-TB regimen.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The cohort of DR-TB patients initiated on treatment in 2019 reported 57 percent treatment success rate (34,535/60,873). This includes 39,358 of patients on shorter MDR-TB regimen (inj-containing) with 59 percent treatment success rate and 1,280 of patient on longer oral regimen with 70 percent treatment success rate. This cohort also includes 11,791 patients put on old conventional MDR-TB regimen that has reported 49 percent treatment success rate.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Available evidence and modelling studies indicate that nearly 20 percent of all TB cases in India may suffer from Diabetes Mellitus (DM).&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Under the&nbsp;National Tuberculosis Elimination Programme&nbsp;(NTEP), in 2021, out of the 74 percent of the known tobacco usage among all TB patients, 12 percent of TB patients were reported to be tobacco users. Among those screened, 30 percent were linked to tobacco cessation services.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Of all the notified TB patients, 95 percent know their HIV status. (Public: 96 percent, Private: 92 percent).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Nearly 95 percent of TB Detection Centres (TDCs) have co-located HIV testing facilities.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; More than 96 percent of&nbsp;People Living With HIV/AIDS&nbsp;(PLHIV) visiting the antiretroviral therapy (ART) centres every month are screened for existing TB symptoms.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; As per Nikshay data, the linkage of HIV-TB co-infected patients to Cotrimoxazole Preventive Therapy (CPT) and Antiretroviral Therapy in 2021 were 93 percent &amp; 95 percent, respectively.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Kindly click <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/JSA-Press-Statement-UB-2022-23-English-Final.pdf">here</a> and <a href="https://im4change.org/latest-news-updates/union-health-budget-2022-23-has-completely-overlooked-the-lessons-of-the-covid-19-epidemic-says-jan-swasthya-abhiyan.html">here</a> to access the [inside]Press release by Jan Swasthya Abhiyan dated February 2, 2022[/inside] on the Union Health Budget 2022-23.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">---</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The COVID-19 pandemic has devastated families and communities and disrupted societies and economies. Patients had to endure various indignities in both public and private hospitals without protections or recourse to adequate preventive and redressal mechanisms. While the COVID-19 vaccine is seen as a solution to the pandemic, its roll-out has also been rife with inequalities. However, many of the problems we have seen at this time stem from the deep-rooted problems in the public health system. A critical look at India&quot;s health system from the perspective of its patients is overdue.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Oxfam India undertook two rapid surveys on Patient&quot;s Rights Charter and COVID-19 vaccination through self-administered questionnaires, covering 28 states and 5 Union territories; as such, this bears the limitations arising from it being a self-selected sample. The former was done between February and April 2021 and received 3890 responses while the latter was done between August and September 2021 covering 10,955 respondents. Given the distinctive focus of each survey, both are presented separately.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The key findings of the survey on Patient&#39;s Rights done for Oxfam India report titled [inside]Securing Rights of Patients in India: Lessons from rapid surveys on peoples&rsquo; experiences of Patient&rsquo;s Rights Charter and the COVID-19 vaccination drive (released on 18 November, 2021)[/inside] are as follows (please <a href="/upload/files/Securing%20Rights%20of%20Patients%20in%20India%20by%20Oxfam%20India.pdf">click here</a> to access):&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; This captures some of the experience of patients with both the public and private healthcare system over the last decade with a focus on the provisions of the Patients &quot;Rights Charter.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Right to Confidentiality, Human Dignity and Privacy: Over a third of women (35 percent) said that they had to undergo a physical examination by a male practitioner without another female present in the room.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Right to Information: 74 percent of people said that the doctor simply wrote the prescription or treatment or asked them to get tests/ investigations done without explaining their disease, nature and/or cause of illness.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Right to Informed Consent: More than half of the respondents (57 percent) who were themselves/ their relatives had been hospitalised did not receive any information about investigations and tests being done.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Right to Second Opinion: At least a third of respondents who had themselves/ their relatives hospitalised said their doctor did not allow a second opinion.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Right to Non-Discrimination: A third of Muslim respondents and over 20 percent Dalit and Adivasi respondents reported feeling discriminated against on the grounds of their religion or caste in a hospital/ by a healthcare professional.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Right to Choose Source of Obtaining Medicine or Test: 8 in 10 respondents reported being asked to get tests/diagnostics from one place only.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Right to Transparency in Rates and Care According to Prescribed Rates: 58 percent of people of those who had themselves/ their relatives hospitalised, said that they were not provided with an estimated cost of treatment/procedure before the start of treatment/procedure. Three in every 10 people surveyed reported being denied case papers, patient records, investigation reports for treatment/ procedure by the hospital even after requesting the same.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Right to Take Discharge of Patient or Receive Body of Deceased from the Hospital: 19 percent of respondents whose close relatives were hospitalized said that they were denied the release of the dead body by the hospital</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em>The COVID-19 pandemic has deepened existing structural inequalities in the healthcare system. The report recommends:</em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The MoHFW should set up a mechanism to review the present status of adoption of the Patient&quot;s Rights Charter (PRC) in all states and UTs and order its immediate adoption. It should include the PRC in the Clinical Establishment Act (CEA) and issue a letter to the states and Union territories (UTs) for displaying PRC in all private and public hospitals in view of the unprecedented crisis induced by the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly for hospitals taking part in the Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (PMJAY).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The State and UT governments should issue orders to display the PRC in all private and public hospitals irrespective of adoption of CEA and ensure grievance redressal mechanisms for patients, through the appointment of an internal grievance officer within every public and private clinical establishment.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The National Medical Commission should introduce mandatory modules on patients &quot;rights in the healthcare curriculum.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em>Some of the key findings from the survey of the experiences of the vaccination drive were:</em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Eight out of 10 people said that they do not think that the government will be able to vaccinate all adults by December 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; 80 percent of people believed that it is more difficult for a daily wage worker to get the vaccine as compared to a salaried, middle-class person. Most did not think that the experience was equitable.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; With respect to how the government should address inequity in vaccination, some specific suggestions were:&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">- 83 percent believed that all vaccination should be done completely free of cost through the government, like previous vaccination drives.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">- Only 2 percent of respondents were in favour of a tax on essentials like fuel to fund the vaccination. 55 percent believed that imposing a one-time tax of 1 percent on the net-worth of India&quot;s richest 1000 families was the best mode of funding.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">- 89 percent of people said that the operational hours of vaccination centres should be expanded beyond 9 AM-5 PM.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">- 95 percent of people from all age categories felt that vaccination must be brought closer to the elderly, persons with disabilities and informal sector workers by making use of mobile vans, vaccination camps and home-based vaccination.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">- 88 percent believed that the government must ensure that marginalized groups such as street dwellers, migrant workers, immigrants, refugees and asylum seekers are given access to<br /> vaccination without having to furnish documentation.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">- Improve information about vaccination. 74 percent of respondents earned less than INR 10,000 per month and over 60 percent of respondents from marginalized and minority communities felt that the government has failed in informing them about how and when to get vaccinated. Eight in 10 felt that the government had been changing its COVID-19 vaccine policies too frequently.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">- 89 percent of people said that the government must do more to ramp vaccine production, especially through public sector companies.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">- The experiences of vaccination show the</p> <p style="text-align:justify">-- Challenges with vaccination:</p> <p style="text-align:justify">---29 percent said that they either had to make multiple visits to the vaccination centre or stand in long queues.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">---22 percent faced issues in booking the slot online or had to try for multiple days ahead to get a slot</p> <p style="text-align:justify">---9 percent people said that they had to lose a day&#39;s wages to get themselves vaccinated.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">-- Reason for not getting vaccinated:</p> <p style="text-align:justify">---43 percent respondents stated that they could not get vaccinated because the vaccination centre had run out of vaccines when they visited the centre.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">---12 percent did not get vaccinated because they could not afford the high prices of vaccines.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The lessons from the COVID-19 vaccination drive, would not only help to improve the current response but can derive learnings improving equitable administration of any vaccine in future.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">-All vaccination should continue to be done completely free of cost through the government system; avoid the use of private hospitals to deliver vaccination;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">-Proactively release timely information on vaccination strategies, modalities and accomplishments in disaggregated, user-friendly and open source formats;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">-Prioritise allocation, distribution and administration of vaccines for marginalized, poor, vulnerable, excluded communities first, of course along with for those who are at risk;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">-Maintain record and release disaggregated data on vaccination coverage based on social and economic groups including Dalits(Scheduled Caste), Adivasis(Scheduled Tribes), Muslims, and Persons with Disabilities (PwD);<br /> &nbsp;<br /> -Bring vaccination closer to the vulnerable and extend operational hours of vaccination centres beyond 9 AM-5 PM to allow for vaccination without a loss of wages;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">-Improve information dissemination about vaccination; existing technology-based mechanisms for disseminating information about vaccination centres locations and availability of vaccines is not sufficient. It would be important to build robust and functional grievance redressal mechanisms, from national to local, to address emerging challenges. Adequate flexibility must be given to local health administrations to adapt to local circumstances;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">-Further ramp up vaccine production, especially through the use of public sector companies.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The report titled [inside]&#39;COVID-19 Third Wave Preparedness: Children&rsquo;s Vulnerability and Recovery&#39; (released on 2nd August, 2021)[/inside] is the outcome of a two-part series of online consultative meetings hosted by National Institute of Disaster Management (NIDM, Delhi). These working group consultative meetings largely included &nbsp;stakeholders from diverse backgrounds -- Central &nbsp;Government, State &nbsp;Governments, Civil Society Organisations (CSOs), social workers, humanitarians, academicians, scientists and researchers. Drawing lessons from the first and second waves, through the deliberations by leading experts during these meetings, the NIDM has been able to produce in the form of final outcome, recommendations for the preparedness of the third wave on the issues related to children and women and their well-being. Kindly <a href="/upload/files/NIDM%20report.pdf">click here</a> to access the report.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The consultative meetings held by NIDM with various stakeholders strongly recommended: a home care model, ramping up of vaccination especially for parents, nurses and other front-line workers, immediate recruitment of healthcare staffs and medical facilities for children, guarantee food security especially for the vulnerable amongst vulnerable, strengthen the community level engagement and risk awareness and communication, zero tolerance towards sexual abuse of children and women and raising awareness through a massive public outreach campaign. There is a huge gap between urban and rural India in terms of awareness, digitisation and medical facilities. It seems like the pandemic outbreak has only exacerbated social inequities and highlighted shortcomings of our society. Hence, the government must prioritise rural India and vulnerable groups in order to cope with the ongoing pandemic. This special report also outlines the women-children complementarity, suggesting that a child&rsquo;s inclusive growth largely depends on that of the mother.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">---</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> The <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/Inequality%20Report%202021%20Indias%20Unequal%20Healthcare%20Story.pdf">report</a> titled Inequality Report 2021: India&#39;s Unequal Healthcare Story examines the status of inequality across various indicators of health among different sections of the population from 2005-06 to 2015-16. The report analyses the government interventions made in terms of health programmes and its impact on health inequality. It also includes ground experiences of people, particularly the marginalised groups, during the pandemic.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The key findings of the [inside]Oxfam India&#39;s Inequality Report 2021: India&#39;s Unequal Healthcare Story (released on 19th July, 2021)[/inside] are as follows (please <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/Inequality%20Report%202021%20Indias%20Unequal%20Healthcare%20Story.pdf">click here</a> to access):&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Growing socio-economic inequalities in India are disproportionately affecting health outcomes of marginalised groups due to the absence of Universal Health Coverage (UHC), reveals Oxfam <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/Inequality%20Report%202021%20Indias%20Unequal%20Healthcare%20Story.pdf">India&rsquo;s Inequality Report</a> <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/Inequality%20Report%202021%20Indias%20Unequal%20Healthcare%20Story.pdf">2021: India&rsquo;s Unequal Healthcare Story</a>.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The new <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/Inequality%20Report%202021%20Indias%20Unequal%20Healthcare%20Story.pdf">report</a> by Oxfam India provides a comprehensive analysis of the health outcomes across different socioeconomic groups to gauge the level of health inequality that persists in the country. The report shows the general category performs better than Scheduled Castes-SCs and Scheduled Tribes-STs; Hindus perform better than Muslims; the rich perform better than the poor; men are better off than women; and the urban population is better off than the rural population on various health indicators. The COVID-19 pandemic has further exacerbated these inequalities.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The public healthcare system in India with its weak and understaffed infrastructure has been overburdened with the consistently rising cases. Private healthcare providers, on the other hand, were charging exorbitant prices, preventing the middle-class and the poor from getting diagnosed and treated until the government intervened to cap their prices. Even then, private healthcare has remained inaccessible to the poor while the rich have easily availed its services. As such, the poor and the vulnerable have mostly been dependent on the overburdened public healthcare facilities &mdash; with insufficient number of beds and inadequate human resources &mdash; for treatment or have gone without being diagnosed and treated.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Health inequalities are linked to and reflect socio-economic inequalities. Often times, it is the socio-economically marginalised communities that suffer from ill-health the most. The ongoing pandemic has revealed that the health systems in most countries are under-prepared to cope with any major health emergency and its unequal impact on the have and the have-nots.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Over the last few decades, India has made great progress in healthcare provisioning. Yet, progressively, the trend has been towards supporting the growth of the private sector in healthcare. This growth has only exacerbated the existing inequalities leaving the poor and the marginalised with no viable healthcare provisions. High costs of health services and lack of quality leads to further impoverishment of the disadvantaged.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The private health sector provided only 5-10 percent of total patient care when India gained independence. Today, it accounts for 66 percent of hospitalization and non-hospitalization cases and 33 percent of institutional births. This growth has been boosted by government concessions and has attracted domestic and foreign companies to set up tertiary care and super speciality hospitals. Within the country, the private formal sector has a distinct customer base. They are the urban-rich. Dehury et al. writes that private hospitals &lsquo;cater to a pool of patient community having health insurance, corporate tie-ups and referrals from general physicians. Usually, the paying capacity of these patients [are] higher than the common Indian citizen&hellip;these hospitals cater to the Indian elite class and organized sector workers having all financial protection.&rsquo;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The private sector is geared towards profits whereas the public provisioning of health services ensures that the poor and the marginalised have equal access to quality healthcare services closer to home. India&rsquo;s public health provisioning has, however, been weak. The public expenditure on health by the central government as a percentage of GDP was a mere 0.32 percent in 2019-20.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The combined expenditure by state and central government was about 1.16 percent of the GDP in 2019, rising marginally by 0.02 percent from 2018 &mdash; falling far behind the goal of making health expenditure 2.5 percent of the GDP. The per capita health expenditure is highest in Arunachal Pradesh at INR 9,854 and lowest in Bihar at INR 697. In the 2021-22 budget, the health ministry has been allocated a total of INR 76,901 crore, a decline of 9.8 percent from the revised estimates of 2020-21 at INR 85,250 crore.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Public funds for health has also been invested specifically in secondary and tertiary care rather than in the provisioning of primary healthcare. &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The public sector has prioritized secondary and tertiary care over primary care. Yet, experts acknowledge that primary care is the cornerstone of achieving equitable delivery and access to quality healthcare by all. While focus has been put on achieving Universal Healthcare in India; the government has selectively adopted the insurance model as a way to universalise healthcare instead of enhancing the primary health care system. As such, access to good quality public healthcare has remained fragmented and India is still far away from achieving universal coverage. The rich can avail healthcare from high-end private providers but the poor are stuck with a difficult choice. They either have to incur debts by availing health care from private providers or depend on a poor public healthcare system.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The Planning Commission in 2011 had observed that expenditure in secondary and tertiary care was drawing away attention from primary health services. Research studies substantiate this position and it is argued that &lsquo;[s]ubstantial proportions of the health budgets have been spent on&hellip;high-end tertiary medical services &mdash; all of which largely benefits the middle classes and detracts from the provision of public health services.&rsquo; Studies have also attributed India&rsquo;s high disease burden to the government&rsquo;s exclusive focus on the urban-oriented curative medical model. The government&rsquo;s focus on &lsquo;a heavily medicalized and hightech curative medical interventions&rsquo;&nbsp;has derailed the goal to make quality and affordable public healthcare accessible to all irrespective of their ability to pay. The result has been a widening of health inequalities along caste, class, gender and geography.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; To make the goals of National Health Mission (NRHM and National Urban Health Mission were subsumed under the NHM in 2013) a reality, there needs to be a strong public health infrastructure in place, even in hard-to-reach areas. Sufficient medical supplies, equipment, drugs and trained medical staff in health centres should be the standard. On the contrary, public health centres remain understaffed with limited supplies.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Among other things, the Inequality Report 2021 on health has recommended the government to increase health spending to 2.5 percent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) to ensure a more equitable health system in the country; ensure that union budgetary allocation in health for SCs and STs is proportionate to their population; prioritize primary health by ensuring that two-thirds of the health budget is allocated for strengthening primary healthcare; state governments to allocate their expenditure on health to 2.5 percent of Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP); the centre should extend financial support to the states with low per capita health expenditure to reduce inter-state inequality in health. It has asked to widen the ambit of insurance schemes to include out-patient care. The major expenditures on health happen through out-patient costs as consultations, diagnostic tests, medicines, etc. While the report does not endorse Government-financed Health Insurance Schemes (GFHIS) as a way to achieve UHC and stresses that insurance can only be a component of it, it is imperative that GFHIS widens its ambit to include outpatient costs as a way to reduce out-of-pocket expenditure (OOPE).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The Constitution of India does not guarantee a fundamental right to health though it does refer to the role of the government in the provisioning of healthcare to all its citizens. Therefore, the right to health should be enacted as a fundamental right that makes it obligatory for the government to ensure equal access to timely, acceptable, and affordable healthcare of appropriate quality, and address the underlying determinants of health to close the gap in health outcomes between the rich and poor.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; With the lockdown aimed at checking the spread of COVID-19, health systems prioritized services related only to COVID-19. Human and material resources like hospitals, beds and intensive care units were diverted towards the management and treatment of COVID-19 patients. Health services catering to non-Covid illnesses were halted, leading to unprecedented hardships and sufferings for chronic patients and those requiring immediate medical intervention such as pregnant women. Accessibility to non-Covid medical services were grimmer for patients in rural and hard-to-reach areas as compared to urban areas due to the unavailability of health centres in the vicinity and the lack of transportation facilities.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Disruptions in the availability of drugs for non-communicable diseases (NCD), tuberculosis (TB), contraceptive and other essential services were also reported. Telemedicine &mdash; the practice of caring for patients remotely &mdash; for which guidelines were issued by the Government of India in March 2020 to facilitate access to medical advice made consultations easier. However, for those with no smart phones and internet connectivity, particularly in rural and hard-to-reach areas, seeking medical advice remained a difficult task. The immunization drive was also disrupted. India vaccinates around 20 million children every year and its disruption might add to the largest number of unimmunized children in the world.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The National Health Profile in 2017 recorded one government allopathic doctor for every 10,189 people and one state-run hospital for every 90,343 people. India also ranks the lowest in the number of hospital beds per thousand population among the BRICS nations &mdash; Russia scores the highest (7.12), followed by China (4.3), South Africa (2.3), Brazil (2.1) and India (0.5). India also ranks lower than some of the lesser developed countries such as Bangladesh (0.87), Chile (2.11) and Mexico (0.98).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The current expenditure on health, by the Centre and the state governments combined, is only about 1.25 percent of GDP which is the lowest among the BRICS countries &mdash; Brazil (9.2) has the highest allocation, followed by South Africa (8.1), Russia (5.3) and China (5.0). It is also lower than some of its neighbouring countries such as Bhutan (2.5 percent) and Sri Lanka (1.6 percent). The low priority given to health expenditure is also reflected in the share in total expenditure of the government, which is only 4 percent whereas the global average stands at 11 percent. In Oxfam&rsquo;s Commitment to Reducing Inequality Report 2020, India ranks 154th in health spending, fifth from the bottom. This poor spending is reflected in the inadequate health resources and infrastructure. Only around 50,069 health and wellness centres (HWCs), which are envisaged to deliver comprehensive primary healthcare (CPHC) closer to homes, are functional. These centres are only 65 percent of the cumulative target for 2020-21. Moreover, in 2019, less than 10 percent of PHCs were funded as per IPHS norms whereas the rest remained underfunded.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Different studies have proved that low public health expenditure yields worse health outcomes. Studies by Barenberg et al. investigated the impact of public health expenditure on Infant Mortality Rate (IMR) and found a negative relationship between the two. Farahani et al. evaluated the relationship between state-level public health spending of India and individual mortality across all age groups using household-level data from the third National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3) showing that a 10 percent increase in public spending on health decreases mortality by about 2 percent, with effects mainly concentrated on women, the young, and the elderly.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The out-of-pocket health expenditure of 64.2 percent in India is higher than the world average of 18.2 percent. Exorbitant prices of healthcare has forced many to sell household assets and incur debts.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The global average for life expectancy is 72.6 years but India (69.42) remains below the global average. It is also lower than the neighbouring countries Nepal (70.8), Bhutan (71.8), Bangladesh (72.6), and Sri Lanka (77) and its BRICS counterparts Brazil (75.9), China (76.9), and Russia (72.6).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; A comprehensive provisioning of public health as water, sanitation and primary healthcare is the most efficient and cost-effective way to achieve UHC around the world.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Evidence from Thailand and Sri Lanka, which have performed better than India with regard to universal access to healthcare, shows that these countries have a high public provisioning of services. Also, evidence from developed countries like Germany, Sweden, Canada and developing countries like Costa Rica reveal that successful insurance-based healthcare system was attained with high levels of public spending and government provisioning of healthcare services.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The Oxfam India <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/Inequality%20Report%202021%20Indias%20Unequal%20Healthcare%20Story.pdf">report</a> says that &lsquo;Kerala invested in infrastructure to create a multi-layered health system, designed to provide first-contact access for basic services at the community level and expanded integrated primary healthcare coverage to achieve access to a range of preventive and curative services&hellip;[,] expanded the number of medical facilities, hospital beds, and doctors&hellip;[and] public health and social development initiatives&hellip; aided in creating the environment for a strong and effective primary care system.&rsquo;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="/upload/files/SOPonCOVID19Containment%26ManagementinPeriurbanRural%26tribalareas.pdf">click here</a> to access the [inside]Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) on COVID-19 Containment and Management in Peri-urban, Rural and Tribal areas[/inside] dated 16th May, 2021. The SOP was issued by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>---</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">The key findings of the report titled [inside]Rural Health Statistics 2019-20 (released in April 2021)[/inside], which has been prepared by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, are as follows (please <a href="/upload/files/Rural%20Health%20Statistics%202019-20%20report%20MoHFW%20latest%20available%282%29.pdf">click here</a> to access):</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; As on 31st March, 2020, there were 1,55,404 and 2,517 Sub Centres (SCs), 24,918 and 5,895 Primary Health Centres (PHCs) and 5,183 and 466 Community Health Centres (CHCs), respectively, which were functioning in rural and urban areas of the country.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average rural population covered by a Sub Centre was 5,729 as on 1st July, 2020, whereas the norm is that one Sub Centre should be serving a population of size in the range 300-5,000.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average population in tribal/ hilly/ desert areas covered by a Sub Centre was 3,381 as on 1st July, 2020, whereas the norm is that one Sub Centre should be serving a population of size up to 3,000 in such areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; A Sub Centre is the most peripheral and first contact point between the primary health care system and the community. Sub Centres are assigned tasks relating to interpersonal communication in order to bring about behavioral change and provide services in relation to maternal and child health, family welfare, nutrition, immunisation, diarrhoea control and control of communicable diseases programmes. Each Sub Centre is required to be manned by at least one auxiliary nurse midwife (ANM) / female health worker and one male health worker. Under the National Rural Health Mission (NRHM), there is a provision for one additional second ANM on contract basis. One lady health visitor (LHV) is entrusted with the task of supervision of six Sub Centres. The Government of India bears the salary of ANM and LHV while the salary of the Male Health Worker is borne by the state governments.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average rural population covered by a Primary Health Centre (PHC) was 35,730 as on 1st July, 2020, whereas the norm is that one Primary Health Centre should be serving a population of size in the range 20,000-30,000.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average population in tribal/ hilly/ desert areas covered by a PHC was 23,930 as on 1st July, 2020, whereas the norm is that one PHC should be serving a population of size up to 20,000 in such areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; PHC is the first contact point between the village community and the medical officer. The PHCs were envisaged to provide an integrated curative and preventive health care to the rural population with emphasis on preventive and promotive aspects of health care. The PHCs are established and maintained by the state governments under the Minimum Needs Programme (MNP)/ Basic Minimum Services (BMS) Programme. As per minimum requirement, a PHC is to be manned by a medical officer supported by 14 paramedical and other staff. Under NRHM, there is a provision for two additional staff nurses at PHCs on contract basis. It acts as a referral unit for 6 Sub Centres and has 4-6 beds for patients. The activities of PHC involve curative, preventive, promotive and family welfare services.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average rural population covered by a Community Health Centre was 1,71,779 as on 1st July, 2020, whereas the norm is that one Community Health Centre should be serving a population of size in the range 80,000-1,20,000.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average population in tribal/ hilly/ desert areas covered by a CHC was 97,178 as on 1st July, 2020, whereas the norm is that one CHC should be serving a population of size up to 80,000 in such areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; CHCs are being established and maintained by the state government under Minimum Needs Program (MNP)/Basic Minimum Services (BMS) programme. As per minimum norms, a CHC is required to be manned by four medical specialists i.e. surgeon, physician, gynecologist and pediatrician supported by 21 paramedical and other staff. It has 30 indoor beds with one OT, X-ray, labour room and laboratory facilities. It serves as a referral centre for 4 PHCs and also provides facilities for obstetric care and specialist consultations.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em>Rural Health Care System in India</em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Out of the sanctioned posts, a significant percentage of posts were vacant at all the levels. Nearly 14.1 percent of the sanctioned posts of Health Worker (Female)/ ANM (at SCs +PHCs) were vacant as compared to 37 percent vacancies of Health Worker (Male) in 2020. At PHCs, 37.6 percent of the sanctioned posts of Health Assistant (Male + Female) and 24.1 percent of the sanctioned posts of Doctors were vacant in 2020.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The availability of manpower is one of the important prerequisites for the efficient functioning of the Rural Health services. As on 31st March, 2020, the overall shortfall (which excludes the existing surplus in some of the states) in the posts of Health Worker (Female) / ANM was 2 percent of the total requirement as per the norm of one HW(F)/ ANM per Sub Centre and PHC. The overall shortfall was mainly due to the shortfall in states of Gujarat (1073), Himachal Pradesh (992), Rajasthan (657), Tripura (389) and Kerala (277). Similarly, in case of Health Worker (Male), there was a shortfall of 65.5 percent of the requirement.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; PHC is the first contact point between the village community and the Medical Officer. Manpower in PHC includes a Medical Officer supported by paramedical and other staff. In the case of PHC, for Health Assistant (male + female), the shortfall was 71.9 percent. For allopathic doctors at PHC, there was a shortfall of 6.8 percent of the total requirement at all India level. This shortfall happened due to a significant shortfall of doctors at PHCs in the states of Odisha (461), Chhattisgarh (404), Rajasthan (249), Madhya Pradesh (134), Uttar Pradesh (121) and Karnataka (105).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The Community Health Centres provide specialised medical care of Surgeons, Obstetricians &amp; Gynecologists, Physicians and Pediatricians. The latest available position of specialists manpower at CHCs as on 31st March, 2020 shows that out of the sanctioned posts, 68.4 percent of Surgeons, 56.1 percent of Obstetricians &amp; Gynecologists, 66.8 percent of physicians and 63.1 percent of pediatricians were vacant. Overall 63.3 percent of the sanctioned posts of specialists at CHCs were vacant. Moreover, as compared to requirements for existing infrastructure, there was a shortfall of 78.9 percent of Surgeons, 69.7 percent of Obstetricians &amp; Gynecologists, 78.2 percent of Physicians and 78.2 percent of Pediatricians. Overall, there was a shortfall of 76.1 percent of specialists at the CHCs as compared to the requirement for existing CHCs. The shortfall of specialists was significantly high in most of the states. However, in addition to the specialists, about 15,342 General Duty Medical Officers (GDMOs) Allopathic and 702 AYUSH Specialists along with 2,720 GDMO AYUSH were also available at CHCs as on 31st March, 2020. In addition to this, there were 890 Anaesthetists and 301 Eye Surgeons available at CHCs as on 31st March, 2020.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Comparison of the manpower position of major categories in 2020 with that in 2019 shows an overall decrease in the number of ANMs at SCs &amp; PHCs and Doctors at PHCs during the period. However, there was an increase in the number of Specialists at CHCs. The number of Specialists at CHCs had increased from 3,881 in 2019 to 4,857 in 2020, which was an increase of 27.7 percent.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Considering the status of paramedical staff, there was an increase of Lab Technicians from 18,715 in 2019 to 19,903 in 2020 at PHCs and CHCs. There was a marginal decrease in the number of pharmacists from 26,204 in 2019 to 25,792 in 2020. A significant decrease was also observed in nursing staff under PHC &amp; CHCs from 80,976 in 2019 to 71,847 in 2020. The number of radiographers had increased marginally from 2,419 in 2019 to 2,434 in 2020.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; A total of 1,193 Sub Divisional/ Sub District Hospitals were functioning as on 31st March, 2020 throughout the country. In these hospitals, 13,399 doctors were available. In addition to these doctors, about 29,937 paramedical staff were also available at those hospitals as on 31st March, 2020. The number of doctors in Sub Divisional/ Sub District Hospitals had reduced from 13,750 in 2019 to 13,399 in 2020. The number of paramedical staff in Sub Divisional/ Sub District Hospitals fell from 36,909 in 2019 to 29,937 in 2020.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In addition to above, 810 District Hospitals (DHs) were also functioning as on 31st March, 2020 throughout the country. There were 22,827 doctors available in the DHs. In addition to the doctors, about 80,920 paramedical staff were also available at District Hospitals as on 31st March, 2020. The number of doctors in District Hospitals went down from 24,676 in 2019 to 22,827 in 2020. The number of paramedical staff in District Hospitals fell from 85,194 in 2019 to 80,920 in 2020.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; As per the Health &amp; Wellness Centre (HWC) portal data, there were a total of 38,595 HWCs functional in India as on 31st March 2020. In total, 18,610 SCs had been converted into HWC-SCs. Also at the level of PHC, a total of 19,985 PHCs had been converted into HWC-PHCs. Out of 19,985 HWC-PHCs, 16,635 PHCs had been converted into HWCs in rural areas and 3,350 in urban areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">**page**</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">Kindly <a href="/upload/files/LASI_India_Factsheet.pdf">click here</a> to access the [inside]India Fact Sheet of Longitudinal Ageing Study in India (LASI) -- Wave-1 (released in 2021)[/inside], An Investigation of Health, Economic, and Social Well-being of India&rsquo;s Growing Elderly Population, India Report 2020, prepared by International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), National Programme for Health Care Elderly (NPHCE), Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health (HSPH), University&nbsp; of Southern California (USC) and Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MoHFW).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="/upload/files/LASI_India_Executive_Summary.pdf">click here</a> to read the [inside]Executive Summary of Longitudinal Ageing Study in India (LASI) -- Wave-1 (released in 2021)[/inside].</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>---</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to the report entitled [inside]A Neglected Tragedy: The global burden of stillbirths -- Report of the UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation, 2020 (released in October 2020)[/inside] (please click <a href="https://www.im4change.org/upload/files/UN-IGME-the-global-burden-of-stillbirths-2020.pdf">here</a> to access):</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; About one stillbirth occurs every 16 seconds, which means that every year, about 2 million babies are stillborn i.e. showing no signs of life at birth. It means every day, almost 5,400 babies are stillborn. Globally, one in 72 babies is stillborn.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In the past two decades, 48 million babies were stillborn. Three-in-four stillbirths occur in sub-Saharan Africa or Southern Asia. Low and lower-middle income countries account for 84 percent of all stillbirths but only 62 percent of all live births.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Stillbirths are largely absent in worldwide data tracking, rendering the true extent of the problem hidden. They are invisible in policies and programmes and underfinanced as an area requiring intervention. Targets specific to stillbirths were absent from the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and are still missing in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; There are a variety of reasons behind the slow reduction in stillbirth rates: absence of or poor quality of care during pregnancy and birth; lack of investment in preventative interventions and the health workforce; inadequate social recognition of stillbirths as a burden on families; measurement challenges and major data gaps; absence of global and national leadership; and no established global targets, such as the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Globally, an estimated 42 percent of all stillbirths are intrapartum (i.e., the baby died during labour); almost all of these 832,000 stillborn deaths that occurred in 2019 could have been prevented with access to high-quality care during childbirth, including ongoing intrapartum monitoring and timely intervention in case of complications.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Around 20 million babies are projected to be stillborn in the next decade, if trends observed between 2000 and 2019 in reducing the stillbirth rate continue. Among the 20 million, 2.9 million stillbirths could be prevented by accelerating progress to meet the ENAP target in the 56 countries at risk to miss the goal. Every Newborn Action Plan (ENAP) calls for each country to achieve a rate of 12 stillbirths or fewer per 1,000 total births by 2030 and to close equity gaps.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In the first two decades of this century (i.e. 2000-2019), the annual rate of reduction (ARR) in the stillbirth rate was just -2.3 percent, compared to a -2.9 percent reduction in neonatal mortality and -4.3 percent among children aged 1&ndash;59 months. Meanwhile, between 2000 and 2017, maternal mortality decreased by -2.9 percent.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In the year 2000, the ratio of the number of stillbirths to the number of under-five deaths was 0.30; by 2019, it had increased to 0.38. So, stillbirths are an increasingly critical global health problem.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; National stillbirth rates around the globe ranged from 1.4 to 32.2 stillbirths per 1,000 total births in 2019. Sub-Saharan Africa, followed by Southern Asia, had the highest stillbirth rate and the greatest number of stillbirths.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Six countries bore the burden of half of all stillbirths of the world &ndash; India, Pakistan, Nigeria, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, China and Ethiopia, in order of burden (highest to lowest).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Nearly 3,40,622 of the 19,66,000&nbsp; stillbirths globally in 2019 were in India, making it the country with the largest such burden (i.e. 17.33 percent).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2019, India, Pakistan and Nigeria alone accounted for one-third of the total burden of stillbirths and 27 percent of live births.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Stillbirth rate is defined as the ratio of the number of still births per 1,000 live births and stillbirths taken together (i.e. total births).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Some progress has been made in preventing stillbirths. Globally, the stillbirth rate declined by 35 percent since 2000. Since 2000, the stillbirth rate declined by 44 percent in Central and Southern Asia, 53 percent in India, 52 percent in Kazakhstan and 44 percent in Nepal.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Among the lower-middle income countries, stillbirth rate fell by 39 percent since 2000. Since the year 2000, stillbirth rate in lower-middle income countries like Mongolia, India and El Salvador declined by 57 percent, 53 percent and 50 percent, respectively.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; A total of 14 countries &ndash; including three low- and lower middle income countries (Cambodia, India, Mongolia) &ndash; slashed the stillbirth rate by more than half during 2000-2019.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The top 15 countries with the greatest percentage decline in the stillbirth rate during 2000&ndash;2019 are China (63 percent), Turkey (63 percent), Georgia (62 percent), North Macedonia (62 percent), Belarus (60 percent), Mongolia (57 percent), Netherlands (55 percent), Azerbaijan (53 percent), Estonia (53 percent), India (53 percent), Kazakhstan (52 percent), Romania (52 percent), El Salvador (50 percent), Peru (48 percent) and Latvia (46 percent).<br /> &nbsp;<br /> &bull; India&#39;s stillbirth rate (i.e. (stillbirths per 1,000 total births) in 2000 was 29.6, in 2010 was 20.2 and in 2019 was 13.9. The percentage decline in India&#39;s stillbirth rate during 2000&ndash;2019 was -53.0 percent. The annual rate of reduction (ARR) in stillbirth rate during 2000-2019 was -4.0 percent.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The total number of stillbirths in India was 852,386 in 2000, 535,683 in 2010 and 340,622 in 2019. The percentage decline in stillbirths during 2000&ndash;2019 was -60.0 percent. The annual rate of reduction (ARR) in total number of stillbirths during 2000&ndash;2019 was -4.8 percent. India witnessed 24,116,000 livebirths and 24,457,000 total births in 2019. &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Women in sub-Saharan Africa and Southern Asia bear the greatest burden of stillbirths in the world. More than three quarters of estimated stillbirths in 2019 occurred in these two regions, with 42 percent of the global total in sub-Saharan Africa and 34 percent in Southern Asia.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2019, stillbirth rate per 1,000 total births in Afghanistan was 28.4 (total stillbirth in 2019: 35,384), Bangladesh was 24.3 (total stillbirth in 2019: 72,508), Bhutan was 9.7 (total stillbirth in 2019: 127), China was 5.5 (total stillbirth in 2019: 92,170), India was 13.9 (total stillbirth in 2019: 340,622), Maldives was 5.8 (total stillbirth in 2019: 41), Myanmar was 14.1 (total stillbirth in 2019: 13,493), Nepal was 17.5 (total stillbirth in 2019: 9,997), Pakistan was 30.6 (total stillbirth in 2019: 190,483) and Sri Lanka was 5.8 (total stillbirth in 2019: 1,943).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Data are essential to understanding the burden of stillbirths and identifying where, when and why they occur.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Immediate actions are needed to strengthen data systems and their ability to collect, analyses and use timely, quality and disaggregated stillbirth data. To improve stillbirth data availability and quality, it is recommended that countries and relevant stakeholders:</p> <p style="text-align:justify">a. Align the stillbirth definition and measures with international standards<br /> b.&nbsp; Integrate stillbirth-specific components within relevant plans for data system strengthening and improvement<br /> c. Record stillbirth outcomes in all relevant maternal and newborn health programs, including routine HMIS (registers and monthly reporting forms)<br /> d. Provide training and support to include stillbirths within civil and vital registration systems as the coverage of these systems increases<br /> e. Include information on timing of stillbirth (antepartum or intrapartum) in all settings and record causes and contributing factors to stillbirth where possible<br /> f. Report and review stillbirth data locally &ndash; at facility or district level &ndash; alongside data on neonatal deaths (by day of death) to reduce incentives for misreporting of outcomes, and to monitor potential misclassification.<br /> g. Collate reported stillbirth rate data up the data system to a national level to enable tracking of progress towards the ENAP target of 12 stillbirths or fewer per 1,000 total births in every country by 2030 and to enable monitoring of geographical inequities.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Ending preventable stillbirths is among the core goals of the UN&rsquo;s Global Strategy for Women&rsquo;s, Children&rsquo;s and Adolescents&rsquo; Health (2016&ndash;2030) and the Every Newborn Action Plan (ENAP). These global initiatives aim to reduce the stillbirth rate to 12 or fewer third trimester (late) stillbirths per 1,000 total births in every country by 2030.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The stillbirth rate (SBR) is defined as the number of babies born with no signs of life at 28 weeks or more of gestation, per 1,000 total births. The stillbirth rate is calculated as: SBR = 1000 * {sb/(sb+lb)}, where &#39;sb&#39; refers to the number of stillbirths &ge; 28 weeks or more of gestational age; and &#39;lb&#39; refers to the number of live births regardless of gestational age or birthweight.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> <strong><em>[Shivangini Piplani, who is doing her MA in Finance and Investment (1st year) from Berlin School of Business and Innovation, assisted the Inclusive Media for Change team in preparing the summary of &#39;A Neglected Tragedy: The global burden of stillbirths -- Report of the UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation, 2020.&#39; She did this work as part of her winter internship at the Inclusive Media for Change project in December 2020.]</em></strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> The Sample Registration System (SRS) is carried out by the Office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner, India with the goal of providing accurate annual estimates of birth rates, death rates, child mortality rates and many other indices of pregnancy and fertility and mortality. The SRS has been providing data for the estimation of various mortality measures since its inception. The report provides mortality indices at the national and state levels, as well as death rates at the sub-state, viz. NSS Natural Division Level. &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The key findings of [inside]Sample Registration System Statistical Report 2018 (released in June 2020)[/inside], published by the Office of the Registrar General &amp; Census Commissioner, are as follows (please <a href="/upload/files/SRS_Statistical_Report_2018.pdf"><span style="background-color:#ffffff">click here</span></a> to access):</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Crude Death Rate (CDR)</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Crude Death Rate (CDR), which is defined as the number of deaths in a year per thousand population, at the national level, stood at 6.2 in 2018. It was 6.7 in rural areas and 5.1 in urban areas. For all bigger states/ UTs, except West Bengal, the CDR in rural areas was higher than that in urban areas. For West Bengal, CDR in rural (CDR 5.6) and urban (CDR 5.7) areas were almost identical, which makes the state the closest to the Line of Equity vis-&agrave;-vis other states/ UTs.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; States that exhibited large differences between urban CDR and rural CDR in 2018 were: Telangana (3 points), Punjab (2.6), Tamil Nadu (2.5), Andhra Pradesh (2.4), Karnataka (2.4), Chhattisgarh (2.3 points) and Himachal Pradesh (2.3). The difference is calculated as Rural CDR - Urban CDR = Difference in CDRs.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The top 5 states with the highest CDRs in 2018 were: Chhattisgarh (8.0), Odisha (7.3), Kerala (6.9), Himachal Pradesh (6.9) and Andhra Pradesh (6.7).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Between the periods 2006-08 and 2016-18, the average CDR at the national level changed by &ndash;14.9 percentage points. Between the above-said time points, CDR declined for all states, except Kerala, which showed an increase of 6 percentage points possibly due to the changes in age structure of its population.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Infant Mortality Rate (IMR)</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Infant Mortality Rate (IMR) is defined as the number of infant (less than one year of age) deaths per one thousand live births during the year.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; IMR has seen a substantial decline over the years, from 129 per 1000 live births in 1971 to 110 in 1981 and from 80 in 1991 to 32 in 2018.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; At the national level, IMR was 36.8 in rural areas and 22.9 in urban areas during the period 2016-18. However, IMR was 36 in rural areas and 23 in urban areas in 2018.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2018, Kerala had the lowest IMR of 7 and Madhya Pradesh had the highest IMR of 48.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2018, at the national level, IMR among male infants stood at 32, while that for female infants it was 33.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; For the year 2018, in all states except Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Delhi, Gujarat, Haryana, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Odisha, Punjab, Tamil Nadu, Telangana and Uttarakhand, female infants experienced a higher mortality rate as compared to male infants.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2018, Jharkhand had the highest difference between male IMR (27) and female IMR (34), followed by Bihar with a large difference between male IMR (30) and female IMR (35). As opposed to that, in Madhya Pradesh male IMR (51) exceeded female IMR (46).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2018, Assam witnessed the highest inequity between rural and urban IMRs with its rural IMR at 44 and urban IMR at 20. States like West Bengal (Urban IMR 20, Rural IMR 22), Punjab (Urban IMR 19, Rural IMR 21), Uttarakhand (Urban IMR 29, Rural IMR 31) and Bihar (Urban IMR 30, Rural IMR 32) had the least inequity between rural and urban IMR.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Between 2006-08 and 2016-18, the average IMR declined by -40.3 percent. In rural areas, decline in IMR between the above-said time points ranged from -63.9 percentage points in Delhi to -32.2 percentage points in Chhattisgarh. The highest fall in IMR in urban areas between the above-said time points was noticed in Delhi i.e. -56.4 percent.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Neonatal Mortality Rate</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Neo-natal Mortality Rate (NMR) is defined as the number of infant (less than 29 days) deaths per one thousand live births during the year.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2018, at the national level, NMR was 23, while in rural and urban areas, they were 27 and 14, respectively.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2018, NMR was the lowest in Kerala at 5 and highest in Madhya Pradesh at 35.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; At the national level, the percentage of neo-natal deaths to total infant deaths was 71.7 percent in 2018, and it was 60.1 percent in urban areas and 74.4 percent in rural areas. It means that most infants die when they are not even 30 days old.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Perinatal Mortality Rate</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Peri-natal mortality rate (PMR) is defined as the number of still births and infant deaths of less than 7 days per 1,000 live births (LB) and still births (SB) taken together during the year.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; At the national level, PMR has been estimated to be 22 in 2018. It was 25 in rural areas and 14 in urban areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2018, Madhya Pradesh had the highest PMR at 30 and Kerala had the lowest PMR at 10.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Still Birth Rate</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Still Birth Rate (SBR) is defined as the ratio of the number of still births per one thousand live births and still births taken together.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; At the national level, the SBR has been estimated to be 4 in 2018.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2018, the highest SBR has been estimated for Odisha (10) and lowest have been estimated for Jammu and Kashmir and Jharkhand (i.e. 1 each).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Under-five Mortality Rate (U5MR)</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Under-five Mortality Rate (U5MR) is the probability of dying between birth and exactly age 5, expressed per 1,000 live births.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; At the national level, U5MR has been estimated to be 36 in 2018. In urban areas, the U5MR in 2018 has been estimated to be 26 while in rural areas, it has been estimated to be 40.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Estimated U5MR was the lowest in Kerala at 10 and was the highest in Madhya Pradesh at 56.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; At the national level, female U5MR (37) was higher than the male U5MR (36) in 2018.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2018, female U5MRs were higher than that of male U5MR in all states except in Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Delhi, Gujarat, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Odisha, Punjab, Tamil Nadu and Uttarakhand.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Age-Specific Mortality Rates (ASMR)</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Age-specific Mortality Rate (ASMR), is defined as the number of deaths in a particular age-group per thousand population of the same age-group during the year.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong><em>5-14 Age Group</em></strong><br /> &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;<br /> &bull; At the national level, the ASDR for the 5-14 age group has been estimated to be 0.5 in 2018.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2018, the lowest ASDR for the 5-14 age group was found for Kerala and Assam (0.2 each) and the highest ASDR for the 5-14 age group was observed in case of Bihar, Odisha, Madhya and Chhattisgarh (0.7 each).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; At the national level, although ASDR for the 5-14 age group was the same for males and females in urban areas (0.4 each), ASDR for the 5-14 age group among females was 0.6 and among males was 0.5 in rural areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong><em>15-59 Age Group</em></strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; At the national level, ASDR for the 15-59 age group has been estimated to be 3.2 in rural areas and 2.3 in urban areas. At the national level, the ASDR for the 15-59 age group was 2.9 in 2018.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2018, the female ASDR for the 15-59 age group was lower than that of male ASDR for the 15-59 age group in all the states.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong><em>60 and Above Age Group</em></strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; At the national level, ASDR for the 60 and above age group has been estimated to be 42.6.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; ASDR for the 60 and above age group among males (45.9) was greater than that among females (39.5). The same trend existed for rural and urban areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; ASDR for the 60 and above age group has been estimated to be the highest in Chhattisgarh (58.9) and lowest in Delhi (28.3).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Sex Ratio at Birth (SRB)</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Sex Ratio at Birth (SRB) is defined as the number of female births per 1000 male births during the year.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The 3 years&rsquo; average of SRB (in the period 2016-18) has been estimated to be 899. At the national level, it was 900 in rural areas and 897 in urban areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; For 2016-18, the average SRB was the highest in Chhattisgarh at 958 and it was the lowest in Uttarakhand at 840.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In rural areas, Chhattisgarh had the highest SRB of 976 and Haryana had the lowest SRB of 840 in the period 2016-18. &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In urban areas, Madhya Pradesh had the highest SRB of 968 and Uttarakhand had the lowest SRB at 810 in the period 2016-18.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong><em>[Meghana Myadam and Sakhi Arun Jagdale, who are doing their MA in Development Studies (1st year) from Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Hyderabad, assisted the Inclusive Media for Change team in preparing the summary of the report by the Office of the Registrar General &amp; Census Commissioner<em>.</em> They did this work as part of their summer internship at the Inclusive Media for Change project in July 2020.]</em></strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="/upload/files/FAQ.pdf">click here</a> to access the [inside]FAQ on COVID-19 prepared by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare[/inside].</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="/upload/files/Containment%20Plan%20for%20Large%20Outbreaks%20of%20COVID19%20Final.pdf">click here</a> to access the [inside]Containment Plan for Large Outbreaks Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019[/inside] (COVID-19), which has been prepared by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">---</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/Background-Paper-COVID19.pdf">click here</a> to read the [inside]Background Note on COVID-19[/inside], which was prepared by Jan Swasthya Abhiyan (JSA) and All India People&rsquo;s Science Network(AIPSN), dated 16th March, 2020.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/Statement-COVID19.pdf">click here</a> to read the [inside]Statement on the COVID-19 pandemic[/inside], which was released by Jan Swasthya Abhiyan (JSA) and All India People&rsquo;s Science Network(AIPSN) on 16th March, 2020.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">---</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/High%20Level%20group%20of%20Health%20Sector.pdf" title="High Level group of Health Sector">click here</a> to access the Report of the [inside]High Level Group on Health Sector (2019), submitted to the Fifteenth Finance Commission of India[/inside]. The members of the High Level Group on Health were Dr. Randeep Guleria, Dr. Devi Shetty, Dr. Dileep Govind Mhaisekar, Dr. Naresh Trehan, Dr. Bhabatosh Biswas and Prof. K Srinath Reddy.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">---</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Press%20Note%20NSS%2075th%20Round%20Report%20Key%20Indicators%20of%20Social%20Consumption%20in%20India%20Health%20July%202017%20to%20June%202018%20released%20on%2023rd%20November%202019.pdf" title="Press Note NSS 75th Round Report Key Indicators of Social Consumption in India Health July 2017 to June 2018 released on 23rd November 2019">click here</a> to access the major findings of [inside]NSS 75th Round Report: Key Indicators of Social Consumption in India: Health, July 2017 to June 2018 (released on 23rd November 2019)[/inside].<br /> <br /> Kindly <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Key%20Indicators%20of%20Social%20Consumption%20in%20India%20Health.pdf" title="Key Indicators of Social Consumption in India Health">click here</a> to access the NSS 75th Round Report: Key Indicators of Social Consumption in India: Health, July 2017 to June 2018 (released on 23rd November 2019).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <div style="text-align:justify">The key findings of the [inside]2019 India TB report (released in September 2019)[/inside], which has been produced by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, are as follows (please <a href="https://tbcindia.gov.in/WriteReadData/India%20TB%20Report%202019.pdf">click here</a> and <a href="https://tbcindia.gov.in/index1.php?lang=1&amp;level=1&amp;sublinkid=4160&amp;lid=2807">click here</a> to access):</div> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> &bull; The country accounted for a quarter of the global tuberculosis (TB) burden with an estimated 27 lakh cases in 2018.<br /> <br /> &bull; In 2018, the country was able to achieve a total notification of 21.5 lakh TB cases, of which 25 percent was from private sector. Majority of the TB burden is among the working age group. Nearly 89 percent of TB cases came from the age group 15-69 years. About two-third of the TB patients were males.<br /> <br /> &bull; Among the notified, treatment was initiated for about 19.1 lakh cases (almost 90 percent), across both public and private sectors.<br /> <br /> &bull; HIV co-infection among TB patient was nearly fifty thousand cases amounting to TB-HIV co-infection rate of 3.4 percent.<br /> <br /> &bull; In 2018, TB notification has increased to 5.37 lakhs. This is an increase by 35 percent in notification from private sector in comparison to 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; Based on private drug sales data, it could be said that in 2016 there was about 1.59 times patients in the private sector as compared to the public sector (approximately 22.7 lakh patients in total).<br /> <br /> &bull; In India about 80 percent of the outpatient care is provided by private health care providers. Considering the quantum of private sector, it necessitates to leverage their capacity to expand health coverage.<br /> <br /> &bull; TB is a notifiable disease vide 2012 as per declaration of Government of India Order. This has expanded the ambit of TB surveillance covering all public as well as private health facilities. The healthcare providers shall notify every TB cases to local authorities such as District Health Officers/ Chief Medical Officers of a district and Municipal Health Officer of a municipal corporation. This notification should be done every month. The surveillance begins with the notification, and completed with acting on the information gathered. In <a href="tinymce/uploaded/TB%20notification%20Gazette%20of%20India%20dated%2019%20March%202018.pdf" title="TB notification Gazette of India dated 19 March 2018">March 2018</a>, the notification was published in Gazette of India, making it mandatory for private providers to notify TB patients and public health system to act upon it.<br /> <br /> &bull; Uttar Pradesh, with 17 percent of population of the country, is the largest contributor to TB cases, with 20 percent of the total notifications, accounting for about 4.2 lakh cases (187 cases per lakh population).<br /> <br /> &bull; Delhi and Chandigarh stand apart from all other states and UTs with regard to notification rates relative to their resident population. Annual notification rates in Delhi and Chandigarh were 504 cases per lakh population and 496 cases per lakh population, respectively. This is because patients residing in other parts of the country are diagnosed/ notified from these two UTs.<br /> <br /> &bull; In 2018, the Revised National Tuberculosis Control Programme (RNTCP) notified 21.5 lakh TB cases, a 16 percent increase over 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; The largest ever National Drug Resistance Survey in the world for 13 anti-TB drugs has been completed and it has indicated about 6.2 percent prevalence of drug resistant TB in the country among all TB patients.<br /> <br /> &bull; The Government of India is prioritising resource allocations for TB in the country with more than Rs. 12,000 crores being invested in the implementation of the National Strategic Plan to End TB 2017-2025. The government has started the Nikshay Poshan Yojana (NPY) for nutritional support to TB patients.&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; It is expected that the country would be able to cover all TB cases through the online notification system -- NIKSHAY.<br /> &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The ending preventable maternal mortality (EPMM) target for reducing the global maternal mortality ratio (MMRatio) by 2030 was adopted as Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) target 3.1: reduce global MMRatio to less than 70 per lakh live births by 2030. Having targets for mortality reduction is important, but accurate measurement of maternal mortality remains challenging and many deaths still go uncounted. Many countries still lack well-functioning civil registration and vital statistics (CRVS) systems, and where such systems do exist, reporting errors &ndash; whether incompleteness (unregistered deaths, also known as &ldquo;missing&rdquo;) or misclassification of cause of death &ndash; continue to pose a major challenge to data accuracy. The report entitled &#39;Trends in Maternal Mortality 2000 to 2017: Estimates by World Health Orgnization (WHO), United Nations Children&#39;s Fund (UNICEF), World Bank Group, United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) and the United Nations Population Division presents internationally comparable global, regional and country-level estimates and trends for maternal mortality between 2000 and 2017.<br /> <br /> The new estimates presented in this report supersede all previously published estimates for years that fall within the same time period. Care should be taken to use only these estimates for the interpretation of trends in maternal mortality from 2000 to 2017; due to modifications in methodology and data availability, differences between these and previous estimates should not be interpreted as representing time trends. In addition, when interpreting changes in MMRatios over time, one should take into consideration that it is easier to reduce the MMRatio when the level is high than when the MMRatio level is already low.<br /> <br /> Please note that Maternal Mortality Ratio is the number of women who die&nbsp; from pregnancy-related causes while pregnant or within 42 days of pregnancy termination per 100,000 live births.<br /> <br /> The key findings of the report entitled [inside]Trends in Maternal Mortality 2000 to 2017: Estimates by WHO, UNICEF, World Bank Group, UNFPA and the United Nations Population Division (released in September 2019)[/inside] are as follows (please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Maternal%20mortality%20Levels%20and%20trends%202000%20to%202017%20Executive%20Summary.pdf" title="Maternal mortality Levels and trends 2000 to 2017 Executive Summary">click here</a> and <a href="https://www.unfpa.org/featured-publication/trends-maternal-mortality-2000-2017">click here</a> to access):&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; Nigeria and India had the highest estimated numbers of maternal deaths, accounting for approximately one-third (35 percent) of estimated&nbsp; global maternal deaths in 2017, with approximately 67,000 and 35,000 maternal deaths (23 percent and 12 percent of global maternal deaths), respectively.<br /> <br /> &bull; Maternal Mortality Ratio for India was 370 in 2000, 286 in 2005, 210 in&nbsp; 2010, 158 in 2015 and 145 in 2017. So, the MMRatio for the country reduced by almost 61 percent between 2000 and 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; MMRatio for China was 59 in 2000, 44 in 2005, 36 in 2010, 30 in 2015 and 29 in 2017. Hence, the MMRatio for China reduced by around 51 percent between 2000 and 2017.&nbsp;&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; The absolute difference in MMRatio between India and China has lessened from 311 in 2000 to 116 in 2017. The country&#39;s MMRatio&nbsp; was 6.3 times that of China in 2000, which has reduced to 5 times in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; MMRatio for Bangladesh was 434 in 2000, 343 in 2005, 258 in 2010, 200 in 2015 and 173 in 2017. Therefore, the MMRatio for Bangladesh decreased by nearly 60 percent between 2000 and 2017.&nbsp;&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; The absolute gap in MMRatio between Bangladesh and India has reduced from 64 in 2000 to 28 in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; MMRatio for Sri Lanka was 56 in 2000, 45 in 2005, 38 in 2010, 36 in 2015 and 36 in 2017. So, the MMRatio for Sri Lanka reduced by roughly 36 percent between 2000 and 2017.&nbsp;&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; MMRatio for Pakistan was 286 in 2000, 237 in 2005, 191 in 2010, 154 in 2015 and 140 in 2017. Therefore, the MMRatio for Pakistan declined by roughly 51 percent between 2000 and 2017.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; MMRatio for South Asia was 395 in 2000, 309 in 2005, 235 in 2010, 179 in 2015 and 163 in 2017. Hence, the MMRatio for South Asia reduced by around 59 percent between 2000 and 2017.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Sub-Saharan Africa and Southern Asia accounted for approximately 86 percent (2,54,000) of the estimated global maternal deaths in 2017 with sub-Saharan Africa alone accounting for roughly 66 percent (1,96,000), while Southern Asia accounted for nearly 20 percent (58,000). South-Eastern Asia, in addition, accounted for over 5 percent of global maternal deaths (16,000).<br /> &nbsp;&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to the [inside]National Health Profile 2018, 13th Issue[/inside], Central Bureau of Health Intelligence, Ministry of Health &amp; Family Welfare (please <a href="https://im4change.org/docs/900National%20Health%20Profile%202018%2013th%20Issue%20Central%20Bureau%20of%20Health%20Intelligence%20Ministry%20of%20Health%20&amp;%20Family%20Welfare.pdf">click here</a> to access):<br /> <br /> <strong>Demographic Indicators</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; The Infant Mortality Rate (IMR) per 1,000 live births has declined considerably from 74 infant deaths in 1994 to 34 infant deaths in 2016. There is a huge gap between IMR in rural areas (38 infant deaths per 1,000 live births) and urban areas (23 infant deaths per 1000 live births).<br /> <br /> &bull; Among the states, the lowest IMR per 1,000 live births in 2016 was found in Goa (8), followed by Kerala (10) and Manipur (11). The highest IMR per 1,000 live births in 2015 was found in Madhya Pradesh (47), followed by both Assam and Odisha (44 each).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The life expectancy of life at birth has increased from 49.7 years in 1970-75 to 68.3 years in 2011-15. In the period 2011-15, the life expectancy for females was 70.0 years and 66.9 years for males.<br /> <br /> &bull; In the period 2011-15, the life expectancy in the rural areas was 67.1 years and in the urban areas it was 71.9 years.<br /> <br /> &bull; The Maternal Mortality Ratio (MMRatio) per 1,00,000 livebirths has decreased from 178 maternal deaths during 2010-12 to 167 maternal deaths during 2011-13. In 2011-13, the MMRatio per 1,00,000 livebirths was the highest in Assam i.e. 300 maternal deaths and lowest in Kerala i.e. 61 maternal deaths.<br /> <br /> &bull; The country&#39;s birth rate per 1,000 estimated mid-year population has fallen from 29.5 livebirths in 1991 to 20.4 livebirths in 2016. Birth rate per 1,000 estimated mid-year population in rural areas was 22.1 livebirths and in urban areas it was 17.0 livebirths in 2016.<br /> <br /> &bull; India&#39;s natural growth rate per 1,000 mid-year population has declined from 19.7 in 1991 to 14.0 in 2016.<br /> <br /> &bull; The proportion of urban population to India&#39;s total population has increased from 25.7 percent in 1991 to 27.81 percent in 2001, and further increased to 31.14 in 2011.<br /> <br /> &bull; The country&#39;s population density has increased from 267 persons per square kilometer in 1991 to 325 persons per square kilometer in 2001, and further rose to 382 persons per square kilometer in 2011.<br /> <br /> &bull; The decadal growth rate of India&#39;s population has fallen from 23.87 percent in 1981-1991 to 21.54 percent in 1991-2001, and further declined to 17.7 percent in 2001-2011.<br /> <br /> <strong>Health Status Indicators</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; In 2017, maximum number of malaria cases was reported in Odisha (3,52,140 cases) and maximum number of deaths was reported in West Bengal (29 deaths).<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of cases of malaria has changed from 8,81,730 in 2013 to 8,42,095 in 2017. The total number of deaths due to malaria has changed from 440 in 2013 to 104 in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; Out of the overall cases of Kala-azar reported in 2017, 72 percent of the cases were reported in Bihar. The total number of cases of Kala-azar has fallen from 13,869 in 2013 to 5,758 in 2017. Likewise, the total number of deaths from Kala-azar has fallen from 20 in 2013 to zero in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; There has been a considerable fall in the number of swine flu cases/ deaths in the year 2014 (viz. 937) as compared with 2012 (viz. 5,044) &amp; 2013 (viz. 5,253). However, the number of cases (42,592) and deaths (2,990) have drastically increased in the year 2015. In 2016, the cases decreased to 1786 and again increased to 38,811 in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; A total of 63,679 cases of chikungunya were reported in 2017 as compared with 64,057 cases in 2016. Most chikungunya cases in 2017 were reported from Karnataka (32,170), followed by Gujarat (7,807) and Maharashtra (7,639).<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of cases and deaths due to chicken pox were 74,035 and 92, respectively in 2017. Kerala accounted for maximum number of cases (30,941) and West Bengal accounted for maximum number of deaths (53) due to chicken pox in 2017.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of cases of Acute Encephalitis Syndrome has increased from 7,825 in 2013 to 13,036 in 2017. The total number of deaths due to Acute Encephalitis Syndrome has decreased from 1,273 in 2013 to 1,010 in 2017. Uttar Pradesh reported maximum numbers of cases (4,749) and maximum number of deaths (593) in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of cases of Japanese Encephalitis has almost doubled from 1,086 in 2013 to 2,180 in 2017. The total number of deaths due to Japanese Encephalitis has increased from 202 in 2013 to 252 in 2017. Uttar Pradesh reported maximum numbers of cases (693) and maximum number of deaths (93) in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of cases and deaths due to encephalitis were 12,485 and 626, respectively in 2017. Assam accounted for maximum number of cases (5,525) and Uttar Pradesh accounted for maximum number of deaths (246) due to chicken pox in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of cases and deaths due to viral meningitis were 7,559 and 121, respectively in 2017. Andhra Pradesh accounted for maximum number of cases (1,493) and maximum number of deaths (33) due to viral meningitis in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of cases of dengue has almost doubled from 75,808 in 2013 to 1,57,996 in 2017. The total number of deaths due to dengue has increased from 193 in 2013 to 253 in 2017. Tamil Nadu reported maximum numbers of cases (23,294) and maximum number of deaths (65) in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; As per the National Programme for Prevention and Control of Cancer, Diabetes, Cardiovascular Diseases and Stroke (NPCDCS), out of 3,57,23,660 patients who attended non-communicable disease (NCD) clinics in 2017, 8.41 percent people are diagnosed with diabetes, 10.22 percent are diagnosed with hypertension (high blood pressure), 0.37% are diagnosed with cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), 0.13 percent are diagnosed with stroke and 0.11 percent are diagnosed with common cancers (including oral, cervical and breast cancer).<br /> <br /> &bull; During the year 2015, the lives of 4,13,457 and 1,33,623 people are cut short as a result of accidental and suicide cases, respectively. Many more people suffer non-fatal injuries, with many incurring a disability as a result of their injury.<br /> <br /> &bull; Suicide rates are increasing significantly for young adults including male, female &amp; transgender in a wider population. The maximum number of suicide cases (44,593) is reported between the age-group 30-45 years.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of disabled persons in India is 26,814,994 as per the Census 2011.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of cases and deaths due to snake bite were 1,42,366 and 948 respectively in 2017.<br /> <br /> <strong>Health Financing in India</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; The total public expenditure on health for the year 2015-16 stood at Rs 1.4 lakh crores (actual).<br /> <br /> &bull; The per capita public expenditure (actual) on health in nominal terms has gone up from Rs. 621 in 2009-10 to Rs. 1,112 in 2015-16.<br /> <br /> &bull; Public expenditure on health (includes health sector expenditure by Centre and States/UTs) as a percentage of GDP was 1.02 percent in 2015-16. There is no significant change in public expenditure on health as a percentage of GDP since 2009-10.<br /> <br /> &bull; The Centre-State share in total public expenditure on health was 31:69 in 2015-16, which used to be 36:64 in 2009-10.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total public expenditure on health (excluding other Central Ministries) in 2015-16 was Rs. 1,40,054 crores, with Medical and Public Health comprising the major share (78.7 percent). The share of Family Welfare was 12.6 percent.<br /> <br /> &bull; Urban and rural health services constituted 71 percent of the public expenditure on medical and public health in 2015-16.<br /> <br /> &bull; The North-Eastern states had the highest (viz. Rs. 2,878 per capita) and Empowered Action Group (EAG) states (including Assam) had the lowest (viz. Rs. 871 per capita) average per capita public expenditure on health in 2015-16 (excluding UTs). For example, in Mizoram the per capita health expenditure was Rs. 5862 (actual) in 2015-16. However, in Bihar, the per capita health expenditure was Rs. 491 (actual) in 2015-16.<br /> <br /> &bull; The North-Eastern states had the highest public health expenditure as a percentage of Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP) in 2015-16 (2.76 percent). Public health expenditure as a percentage of GSDP stood at 1.36 percent for EAG states (including Assam) and 0.76 percent for major non-EAG states.<br /> <br /> &bull; Based on the Health Survey (71st round) conducted by National Sample Service Office (NSSO), the average medical expenditure incurred during stay at hospital between January, 2013 and June, 2014 was Rs. 14,935 for rural and Rs. 24,436 for urban India.<br /> <br /> &bull; The average total medical expenditure per child birth as in-patient over the last 365 days (survey conducted from January to June 2014) in a public hospital in rural areas was Rs. 1,587 and in urban areas is Rs. 2,117.<br /> <br /> &bull; Around 43 crore individuals were covered under any health insurance in the year 2016-17. This amounts to 34 percent of the total population of India. Almost 79 percent of them were covered by public insurance companies.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; Overall, 77 percent of all persons covered with insurance fall under Government-sponsored schemes.<br /> <br /> &bull; Public insurance companies had a higher share of coverage and premium for all types of health insurance policies, except family floater policies including individual policies.<br /> <br /> &bull; Compared to countries that have either Universal Health Coverage or moving towards it, India&rsquo;s per capita public spending on health is low.<br /> <br /> <strong>Human Resources in Health Sector</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; The number of registered allopathic doctors possessing recognized medical qualifications (under Indian Medical Council Act) and registered with state medical council for the years 2016 and 2017 were 25,282 and 17,982, respectively. Upto 2017, the total number of doctors possessing recognised medical qualifications (under the IMC Act) registered with the State Medical Councils/ Medical Council of India is 10,41,395.&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; In 2017, the average population served per government allopathic doctor was 11,082. The state having the highest average population served per government allopathic doctor in 2017 was Bihar (28,391), followed by Uttar Pradesh (19,962) and Jharkhand (18,518).&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; In 2017, the average population served per government dental surgeon was 1,76,004. The state having the highest average population served per government dental surgeon in 2017 was Chhattisgarh (25,87,900), followed by Maharashtra (14,83,150) and Uttar Pradesh (11,41,869).<br /> <br /> &bull; The number of dental surgeon registered with Central/ State Dental Councils of India has increased from 93,332 in 2008 to 2,51,207 as on 31st December, 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; Over the years with gaining popularity, there is a steady rise in total number of registered AYUSH doctors in India from 7,71,468 in 2016 to 7,73,668 in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; There was a total of 8,41,279 Auxilliary Nurse Midwives (ANMs) serving in the country as on 31st December, 2016.<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 31st December, 2016, the highest number of registered ANMs among the states were found in Andhra Pradesh (1,38,435), followed by Rajasthan (1,08,688) and Odisha (62,159).<br /> <br /> &bull; There are 19,80,536 Registered Nurses and Registered Midwives (RN &amp; RM) and 56,367 Lady Health Visitors (LHV) serving in the country as on 31st December, 2016.<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 31st December, 2016, the highest number of registered RN &amp; RM among the states were found in Tamil Nadu (2,62,718), followed by Kerala (2,46,161) and Andhra Pradesh (2,32,621).<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 13th November, 2017, the total number of registered pharmacists operating in the country is 9,07,132.<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 13th November, 2017, the highest number of registered pharmacists among the states were found in Maharashtra (2,03,089), followed by Gujarat (1,19,445) and Andhra Pradesh (1,15,754).<br /> <br /> &bull; In rural areas, the total number of allopathic doctors at primary health centres (PHCs) was 27,124 as on 31st March, 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 31st March, 2017, among the states, the highest number of allopathic doctors at PHCs was found in Maharashtra (2,929), followed by Tamil Nadu (2,759) and Rajasthan (2,382).<br /> <br /> &bull; In rural areas, the total number of specialists at community health centres (CHCs) is 4,156 as on 31st March, 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 31st March, 2017, among the states, the highest number of specialists at CHCs is found in Maharashtra (508), followed by Karnataka (498) and Rajasthan (497).<br /> <br /> <strong>Health Infrastructure</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; Medical education infrastructures in the country have shown rapid growth during the last 26 years. The country has 476 medical colleges, 313 dental colleges for Bachelor of Dental Surgery (BDS) &amp; 249 dental colleges for Master of Dental Surgery (MDS). There has been a total admission of 52,646 in 476 Medical Colleges and 27,060 in BDS and 6,233 in MDS during 2017-18.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of dental colleges for BDS has increased from 77 in 1994-95 to 313 in 2017-18 viz. by 4.1 times. The total number of dental colleges for MDS has increased from 32 in 1994-95 to 249 in 2017-18 viz. by 7.8 times.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of admission in dental colleges for BDS has risen from 1,987 in 1994-95 to 27,060 in 2017-18 viz. by 13.6 times. The total number of admission in dental colleges for MDS has risen from 225 in 1994-95 to 6,233 in 2017-18 viz. 27.7 times.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of medical colleges in India has increased from 146 in 1991-92 to 476 in 2017-18 viz. by 3.3 times.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of male students taking admissions in medical colleges has gone up from 7,468 in 1991-92 to 26,082 in 2017-18 viz. by 3.5 times. The total number of female students taking admissions in medical colleges has gone up from 4,731 in 1991-92 to 26,564 in 2017-18 viz. by 5.6 times.<br /> <br /> &bull; India has 3,215 institutions producing 1,29,926 General Nurse Midwives annually and 777 colleges for Pharmacy (Diploma) with an intake capacity of 46,795 as on 31st October, 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; There are 23,582 government hospitals having 7,10,761 beds in the country. It means that there is just one bed for 1,826 Indians in government hospitals, assuming that the projected population in 2018 being 129,80,41,000 as on 1st March, 2018.<br /> <br /> &bull; Around 19,810 government hospitals are in rural areas with 2,79,588 beds and 3,772 government hospitals are in urban areas with 4,31,173 beds.<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 31st March, 2017, there were 1,56,231 sub-centres, 25,650 primary health centres (PHCs) and 5,624 community health centres (CHCs).<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 31st March, 2017, most sub-centres were found in Uttar Pradesh (20,521), followed by Rajasthan (14,406) and Maharashtra (10,580).&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 31st March, 2017, most PHCs were found in Uttar Pradesh (3,621), followed by Karnataka (2,359) and Rajasthan (2,079).&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 31st March, 2017, most CHCs were found in Uttar Pradesh (822), followed by Rajasthan (579) and Tamil Nadu (385).<br /> <br /> &bull; Medical care facilities under AYUSH by management status i.e. dispensaries &amp; hospitals were 27,698 and 3,943 respectively, as on 1st April, 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of licensed blood banks in the country till June, 2017 was 2,903. The highest number of blood banks are found in Maharashtra (328), followed by Uttar Pradesh (294) and Tamil Nadu (291).&nbsp;&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; In total, there were 469 eye banks (362 privately run and 107 government run) in the country as on 4th January, 2018. Most eye banks were found in Maharashtra (166), followed by Karnataka (39) and Madhya Pradesh (36).<br /> <br /> <strong>Achievement of health-related SDGs targets</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; On most targets pertaining to health-related Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), India lags behind the target. For example, although the target for coverage of essential health services is 100 percent (indicator no. 3.8.1), in our country only 57 percent of the population is covered by such services. Similarly, although the target for Maternal Mortality Ratio (per 1,00,000 live births) is 70 by 2030 (indicator no. 3.1.1), MMRatio in India presently is 174.<br /> <br /> &bull; The target for Under-five mortality rate (per 1000 live births) is 25 by 2030 (indicator no. 3.2.1). However, U5MR in the country is 47.7.<br /> <br /> &bull; In case of many SDG-related indicators such as Suicide mortality rate (per 100,000 population) (indicator no. 3.4.2) or say Adolescent birth rate (per 1000 women aged 15-19 years) (indicator no. 3.7.2), the SDG target is yet to be determined.<br /> <br /> &bull; For many SDG-related indicators such as Hepatitis B incidence (indicator no. 3.3.4) or say Proportion of the population with access to affordable medicines and vaccines on a sustainable basis (indicator no. 3.b.1), the data for India is either not provided or remain unavailable.<br /> <br /> <strong>Table: Current Status of Health-related Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Target - Indian Scenario</strong><br /> <br /> <img alt="SDGs" src="tinymce/uploaded/SDGs_1.jpg" style="height:242px; width:334px" /><br /> <br /> <em><strong>Source:</strong> Monitoring Health in the Sustainable Development Goals: 2017, World Health Organization, Regional Office for South East Asia, as quoted in the National Health Profile 2018, please <a href="https://bit.ly/2MmfuuK">click here</a> to access, page no. 288<br /> <br /> Report of the Inter-Agency and Expert Group on Sustainable Development Goal Indicators (E/CN.3/2016/2/Rev.1), please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Final%20list%20of%20SDG%20indicators.pdf">click here</a> to access </em><br /> <br /> <br /> &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">While state-level trends for some important health indicators have been available in India, a comprehensive assessment of the diseases causing the most premature deaths and disability in each state, the risk factors responsible for this burden, and their time trends have not been available in a single standardised framework. The India State-level Disease Burden Initiative was launched in October 2015 to address this crucial knowledge gap with support from the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare of the Government of India. This is a collaborative effort between the Indian Council of Medical Research, Public Health Foundation of India, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, and experts and stakeholders from about 100 institutions across India. The work of this Initiative is overseen by an Advisory Board consisting of eminent policymakers and involves extensive engagement of 14 domain expert groups with the estimation process. Based on intense work over two years, this report describes the distribution and trends of diseases and risk factors for every state of India from 1990 to 2016.<br /> <br /> The estimates were produced as part of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. The analytical methods of this study have been standardised over two decades of scientific work, which has been reported in over 16,000 peer-reviewed publications, making it the most widely used approach globally for disease burden estimation. These methods enable standardised comparisons of health loss caused by different diseases and risk factors, between geographic units, sexes, and age groups, and over time in a unified framework. The key metric used for this comparison is disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), which is the sum of the number of years of life lost due to premature death and a weighted measure of the years lived with disability due to a disease or injury. The use of DALYs to track disease burden is recommended by India&rsquo;s National Health Policy of 2017.<br /> <br /> It is to be noted that attributable burden is the share of the burden of a disease that can be estimated to occur due to exposure to a particular risk factor.<br /> <br /> According to the report entitled [inside]India: Health of the Nation&rsquo;s States - The India State-Level Disease Burden Initiative, Disease Burden Trends in the States of India 1990 to 2016 (released in October, 2017) [/inside], prepared by Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), Public Health Foundation of India (PHFI), Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) and Ministry of Health &amp; Family Welfare (MoHFW), please <a href="https://im4change.org/docs/11592India_Health_of.pdf">click here</a> to access:<br /> <br /> <em>Health status improving, but major inequalities between states</em><br /> <br /> &bull; Life expectancy at birth improved in India from 59.7 years in 1990 to 70.3 years in 2016 for females, and from 58.3 years to 66.9 years for males. There were, however, continuing inequalities between states, with a range of 66.8 years in Uttar Pradesh to 78.7 years in Kerala for females, and from 63.6 years in Assam to 73.8 years in Kerala for males in 2016.<br /> <br /> &bull; The per person disease burden measured as DALYs rate dropped by 36 percent from 1990 to 2016 in India, after adjusting for the changes in the population age structure during this period. But there was an almost two-fold difference in this disease burden rate between the states in 2016, with Assam, Uttar Pradesh, and Chhattisgarh having the highest rates, and Kerala and Goa the lowest rates.<br /> <br /> &bull; While the disease burden rate in India has improved since 1990, it was 72 percent higher per person than in Sri Lanka or China in 2016.<br /> <br /> &bull; The under-5 mortality rate has reduced substantially from 1990 in all states, but there was a four-fold difference in this rate between the highest in Assam and Uttar Pradesh as compared with the lowest in Kerala in 2016, highlighting the vast health inequalities between the states.<br /> <br /> <em>Large differences between states in the changing disease profile</em><br /> <br /> &bull; Of the total disease burden in India measured as DALYs, 61 percent was due to communicable, maternal, neonatal, and nutritional diseases (termed infectious and associated diseases in this summary for simplicity) in 1990, which dropped to 33 percent in 2016.<br /> <br /> &bull; There was a corresponding increase in the contribution of non-communicable diseases from 30 percent of the total disease burden in 1990 to 55 percent in 2016, and of injuries from 9 percent to 12 percent.<br /> <br /> &bull; Infectious and associated diseases made up the majority of disease burden in most of the states in 1990, but this was less than half in all states in 2016. However, the year when infectious and associated diseases transitioned to less than half of the total disease burden ranged from 1986 to 2010 for the various state groups in different stages of this transition.<br /> <br /> &bull; The wide variations between the states in this epidemiological transition are reflected in the range of the contribution of major disease groups to the total disease burden in 2016: 48 percent to 75 percent for non-communicable diseases, 14 percent to 43 percent for infectious and associated diseases, and 9 percent to 14 percent for injuries. Kerala, Goa, and Tamil Nadu have the largest dominance of non-communicable diseases and injuries over infectious and associated diseases, whereas this dominance is present but relatively the lowest in Bihar, Jharkhand, Uttar Pradesh, and Rajasthan.<br /> <br /> &bull; It is to be noted that epidemiological transition level (ETL) is based on the ratio of the number of DALYs in a population due to communicable, maternal, neonatal, and nutritional diseases to the number of DALYs due to non-communicable diseases and injuries together. A decreasing ratio indicates advancing epidemiological transition with an increasing relative burden from non-communicable diseases as compared with communicable, maternal, neonatal, and nutritional diseases.<br /> <br /> &bull; The major EAG states of Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh both have a relatively lower level of development indicators and are at a similar less advanced epidemiological transition stage. However, Uttar Pradesh had 50 percent higher disease burden per person from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 54 percent higher burden from tuberculosis, and 30 percent higher burden from diarrhoeal diseases, whereas Madhya Pradesh had 76% higher disease burden per person from stroke. The cardiovascular risks were generally higher in Madhya Pradesh, and the unsafe water and sanitation risk was relatively higher in Uttar Pradesh.<br /> <br /> &bull; The two North-East India states of Manipur and Tripura are both at a lower-middle stage of epidemiological transition but have quite different disease burden rates from specific leading diseases. Tripura had 49% higher per person burden from ischaemic heart disease, 52 percent higher from stroke, 64 percent higher from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 159 percent higher from iron-deficiency anaemia, 59 percent higher from lower respiratory infections, and 56 percent higher from neonatal disorders. Manipur, on the other hand, had 88 percent higher per person burden from tuberculosis and 38 percent higher from road injuries. Regarding the level of risks, child and maternal malnutrition, air pollution, and several of the cardiovascular risks were higher in Tripura.<br /> <br /> &bull; The two adjoining north Indian states of Himachal Pradesh and Punjab both have a relatively higher level of development indicators and are at a similar more advanced epidemiological transition stage. However, there were striking differences between them in the level of burden from specific leading diseases. Punjab had 157 percent higher per person burden from diabetes, 134 percent higher burden from ischaemic heart disease, 49 percent higher burden from stroke, and 56 percent higher burden from road injuries. On the other hand, Himachal Pradesh had 63 percent higher per person burden from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Consistent with these findings, Punjab had substantially higher levels of cardiovascular risks than Himachal Pradesh.<br /> <br /> <em>Rising burden of non-communicable diseases in all states</em><br /> <br /> &bull; The contribution of most of the major non-communicable disease groups to the total disease burden has increased all over India since 1990, including cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, chronic respiratory diseases, mental health and neurological disorders, cancers, musculoskeletal disorders, and chronic kidney disease.<br /> <br /> &bull; Among the leading non-communicable diseases, the largest disease burden or DALY rate increase from 1990 to 2016 was observed for diabetes, at 80 percent, and ischaemic heart disease, at 34 percent. In 2016, three of the five leading individual causes of disease burden in India were non-communicable, with ischaemic heart disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as the top two causes and stroke as the fifth leading cause.<br /> <br /> &bull; The range of disease burden or DALY rate among the states in 2016 was 9 fold for ischaemic heart disease, 4 fold for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and 6 fold for stroke, and 4 fold for diabetes across India. While ischaemic heart disease and diabetes generally had higher DALY rates in states that are at a more advanced epidemiological transition stage toward non-communicable diseases, the DALY rates of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were generally higher in the EAG states that are at a relatively less advanced epidemiological transition stage.<br /> <br /> &bull; The DALY rates of stroke varied across the states without any consistent pattern in relation to the stage of epidemiological transition. This variety of trends of the different major non-communicable diseases indicates that policy and health system interventions to tackle their increasing burden have to be informed by the specific trends in each state.<br /> <br /> <em>Infectious and associated diseases reducing, but still high in many states</em><br /> <br /> &bull; The burden of most infectious and associated diseases reduced in India from 1990 to 2016, but five of the ten individual leading causes of disease burden in India in 2016 still belonged to this group: diarrhoeal diseases, lower respiratory infections, iron-deficiency anaemia, preterm birth complications, and tuberculosis.<br /> <br /> &bull; The burden caused by these conditions generally continues to be much higher in the Empowered Action Group (EAG) and North-East state groups than in the other states, but there were notable variations between the states within these groups as well.<br /> <br /> &bull; One should noted that the Empowered Action Group (EAG) states is a group of eight states that receive special development effort attention from the Government of India, namely, Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Odisha, Rajasthan, Uttarakhand, and Uttar Pradesh.<br /> <br /> &bull; For India as whole, the disease burden or DALY rate for diarrhoeal diseases, iron-deficiency anaemia, and tuberculosis was 2.5 to 3.5 times higher than the average globally for other geographies at a similar level of development, indicating that this burden can be brought down substantially.<br /> <br /> <em>Increasing but variable burden of injuries among states</em><br /> <br /> &bull; The contribution of injuries to the total disease burden has increased in most states since 1990. The highest proportion of disease burden due to injuries is in young adults. Road injuries and self-harm, which includes suicides and non-fatal outcomes of self-harm, are the leading contributors to the injury burden in India.<br /> <br /> &bull; The range of disease burden or DALY rate varied 3 fold for road injuries and 6 fold for self-harm among the states of India in 2016.<br /> <br /> &bull; The burden due to road injuries was much higher in males than in females. The DALY rate for self-harm for India as a whole was 1.8 times higher than the average globally for other geographies at a similar level of development in 2016.<br /> <br /> <em>Rising risks for cardiovascular diseases and diabetes</em><br /> <br /> &bull; Of the total disease burden in India in 1990, a tenth was caused by a group of risks including unhealthy diet, high blood pressure, high blood sugar, high cholesterol, and overweight, which mainly contribute to ischaemic heart disease, stroke, and diabetes. The contribution of this group of risks increased massively to a quarter of the total disease burden in India in 2016.<br /> <br /> &bull; The combination of these risks was highest in Punjab, Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Andhra Pradesh, and Maharashtra in 2016, but importantly, the contribution of these risks has increased in every state of the country since 1990.<br /> <br /> &bull; The other significant contributor to cardiovascular diseases and diabetes, as well as to cancers and some other diseases, is tobacco use, which was responsible for 6% of the total disease burden in India in 2016. All of these risks are generally higher in males than in females.<br /> <br /> <em>Unacceptably high risk of child and maternal malnutrition</em><br /> <br /> &bull; While the disease burden due to child and maternal malnutrition has dropped in India substantially since 1990, this is still the single largest risk factor, responsible for 15% of the total disease burden in India in 2016. This burden is highest in the major EAG states and Assam, and is higher in females than in males.<br /> <br /> &bull; Child and maternal malnutrition contributes to disease burden mainly through increasing the risk of neonatal disorders, nutritional deficiencies, diarrhoeal diseases, lower respiratory infections, and other common infections.<br /> <br /> &bull; As a stark contrast, the disease burden due to child and maternal malnutrition in India was 12 times higher per person than in China in 2016. Kerala had the lowest burden due to this risk among the Indian states, but even this was 2.7 times higher per person than in China.<br /> <br /> <em>Unsafe water and sanitation improving, but not enough yet</em><br /> <br /> &bull; Unsafe water and sanitation was the second leading risk responsible for disease burden in India in 1990, but dropped to the seventh leading risk in 2016, contributing 5 percent of the total disease burden, mainly through diarrhoeal diseases and other infections.<br /> <br /> &bull; Risk factors means potentially modifiable causes of disease and injury.<br /> <br /> &bull; The burden due to this risk is also highest in several EAG states and Assam, and higher in females than in males. The improvement in exposure to this risk from 1990 to 2016 was least in the EAG states, indicating that higher focus is needed in these states for more rapid improvements.<br /> <br /> &bull; The per person disease burden due to unsafe water and sanitation was 40 times higher in India than in China in 2016.<br /> <br /> <em>Household air pollution improving, outdoor air pollution worsening</em><br /> <br /> &bull; The contribution of air pollution to disease burden remained high in India between 1990 and 2016, with levels of exposure among the highest in the world. It causes burden through a mix of non-communicable and infectious diseases, mainly cardiovascular diseases, chronic respiratory diseases, and lower respiratory infections.<br /> <br /> &bull; The burden of household air pollution decreased during the period 1990-2016 due to decreasing use of solid fuels for cooking, and that of outdoor air pollution increased due to a variety of pollutants from power production, industry, vehicles, construction, and waste burning.<br /> <br /> &bull; Household air pollution was responsible for 5 percent of the total disease burden in India in 2016, and outdoor air pollution for 6 percent. The burden due to household air pollution is highest in the EAG states, where its improvement since 1990 has also been the slowest. On the other hand, the burden due to outdoor air pollution is highest in a mix of northern states, including Haryana, Uttar Pradesh, Punjab, Rajasthan, Bihar, and West Bengal.<br /> &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> The report entitled National Health Accounts: Estimates for India 2014-15 (released in October, 2017) provides healthcare expenditures in India based on National Health Accounts Guidelines for India, 2016 (with refinements where required) that adhere to System of Health Accounts 2011 (SHA 2011), a global standard framework for producing health accounts. The NHA estimates for India is a result of an institutionalised process wherein, the boundaries, data sources, classification codes and estimation methodology have all been standardised in consultation with national and international experts under the guidance of NHA Expert Group for India.<br /> <br /> The NHA provides key indicators to understand financing of health system in the country and allows for comparison with other countries. The National Health Policy 2017 sets out several goals related to healthcare financing and emphasizes the need to track expenditures on health through a robust system of National Health Accounts. The production of annual NHA estimates builds a database for tracking trends in allocations for health by union/state governments and estimate the burden of out-of-pocket payments.<br /> <br /> The key findings of the report entitled [inside]National Health Accounts: Estimates for India 2014-15 (released in October, 2017)[/inside], which has been prepared by the National Health Accounts Technical Secretariat, National Health Systems Resource Centre and Ministry of Health and Family Welfare&nbsp; are as follows (please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/National%20Health%20Accounts%20Estimates%20Report%202014-15.pdf" title="National Health Accounts Estimates for India 2014-15">click here</a> to access):<br /> <br /> &bull; The Total Health Expenditure (THE) for India is estimated at Rs. 4,83,259 crores (3.89 percent of GDP and Rs. 3,826 per capita) for the year 2014-15. THE constitutes current and capital expenditures incurred by Government and Private Sources including External/Donor funds. Current Health Expenditure (CHE) is Rs. 4,51,286 crores (93.4 percent of THE) and capital expenditures is Rs. 31,973 crores (6.6 percent of THE).<br /> <br /> &bull; The Government Health Expenditure (GHE) including capital expenditure is Rs. 1,39,949 crores (29 percent of THE, 1.13 percent GDP and Rs. 1,108 per capita) for the year 2014-15. This amounts to about 3.94 percent of General Government Expenditure in 2014-15. Of the GHE, Union Government share is 37 percent and State Government share is 63 percent. Union Government Expenditure on National Health Mission is Rs. 20,199 crores, Defence Medical Services Rs. 6,695 crores, Railway Health Services is Rs. 2,111 crores, Central Government Health Scheme (CGHS) is Rs. 2,300 crores and Ex Servicemen Contributory Health Scheme (ECHS) is Rs. 2,243 crores.<br /> <br /> &bull; The Out-of-Pocket Expenditure (OOPE) on health by households is Rs. 3,02,425 crores (62.6 percent of THE, 2.4 percent of GDP, Rs. 2,394 per capita) for the year 2014-15. Private Health Insurance expenditure is Rs. 17,755 crores (3.7 percent of THE) for the year 2014-15.<br /> <br /> &bull; Of the Current Health Expenditure, Union Government share is Rs. 37,221 crores (8.2 percent) and the State Government&rsquo;s share Rs. 59,978 crores (13.3 percent). Local bodies&rsquo; share is Rs. 2,960 crores (0.7 percent), Households share (including insurance contributions) about Rs. 3,20,262 crores (71 percent, OOPE being 67 percent). Contribution by enterprises (including insurance contributions) is Rs. 20,069 crores (4.4 percent) and NGOs is Rs. 7,422 crores (1.6 percent). External/donor funding contributes to about Rs. 3,374 crores (0.7 percent).<br /> <br /> &bull; The Current Health Expenditure attributed to Government Hospitals is Rs. 64,685 crores (14.3 percent) and Private Hospitals Rs. 1, 16,943 (25.9 percent). Expenditures incurred on other Government Providers (including PHC, Dispensaries and Family Planning Centres) is Rs. 27,782 crores (6.2 percent), Other Private Providers (incl. private clinics) is Rs. 23,795 crores (5.3 percent), Providers of Patient Transport and Emergency Rescue is Rs. 20,627 crores (4.6 percent), Medical and Diagnostic laboratories is Rs. 21,058 crores (4.7 percent), Pharmacies is Rs. 1,30,451 crores (28.9 percent), Other Retailers is Rs. 559 crores (0.1 percent), Providers of Preventive care is Rs. 23,817 crores (5.3 percent), and Other Providers is Rs. 9,985 crores (2.2 percent). About Rs. 11,584 crores (2.6 percent) is attributed to Providers of Health System Administration and Financing.<br /> <br /> &bull; Current health expenditure attributed to Inpatient Curative Care is Rs. 1,58,334 crores (35.1 percent), Outpatient curative care is Rs. 73,059 crores (16.2 percent), Patient Transportation is Rs. 20,627 crores (4.6 percent), Laboratory and Imaging services is Rs. 21,058 crores (4.7 percent), Prescribed Medicines is Rs. 1,28,887 crores (28.6 percent), Over The Counter (OTC) Medicines is Rs. 1564 crores (0.3 percent), Therapeutic Appliances and Medical Goods is Rs. 559 crores (0.1 percent), Preventive Care is Rs. 30,420 crores (6.7 percent), and others is Rs. 5,194 crores (1.2 percent). About Rs. 11,584 crores (2.6 percent) is attributed to Governance and Health System Administration.<br /> <br /> &bull; Total Pharmaceutical Expenditure is 37.9 percent of CHE (includes prescribed medicines, over the counter drugs and those provided during an inpatient, outpatient or any other event involving a contact with health care provider). The Expenditure on Traditional, Complementary and Alternative Medicine (TCAM) is 16 percent of CHE.<br /> <br /> &bull; The Current Health Expenditure attributed to Primary Care is 45.1 percent, Secondary Care is 35.6 percent, Tertiary care is 15.6 percent and governance and supervision is 2.6 percent. When this is disaggregated; Government expenditure on Primary Care is 51.3 percent, Secondary Care is 21.9 percent and Tertiary Care is 14 percent. Private expenditure on Primary Care is 43.1 percent, Secondary Care is 39.9 percent and Tertiary Care is 16.1 percent.<br /> &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/National%20Health%20Policy%202017.pdf">click here</a> to access the [inside]National Health Policy 2017[/inside].</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> The National Health Profile provides the latest data on all major health sector-related indicators in a comprehensive manner. It gives information on 6 major sectors i.e. Demographic, Socio-economic, Health Status, Health Finance, Health Infrastructure and Human Resources.&nbsp;<br /> <br /> According to the [inside]National Health Profile 2015[/inside], produced by the Central Bureau of Health Intelligence, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, (please <a href="http://www.cbhidghs.nic.in/E-Book%20HTML-2015/index.html">click here</a> to access):<br /> <br /> <strong><em>Demographic indicators</em></strong><br /> <br /> &bull; Infant Mortality Rate has declined considerably (40 per 1000 live births in 2013), however differentials of rural (44) and urban (27) are still high.<br /> <br /> &bull; Maternal Mortality Ratio (per 1 lakh live births) is highest in Assam (300) and lowest in Kerala (61) in 2011-13.<br /> <br /> &bull; The life expectancy at birth has increased from 49.7 years in 1970-75 to 66.1 years in 2006-10. During 2006-10, the life expectancy for females has been 67.7 years and males has been 64.6 years.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; Among the states, sex ratio is least for Haryana (879) while among the UTs, Daman and Diu (618) lags behind. Kerala (1084) tops the list with maximum sex ratio.<br /> <br /> &bull; The Total Fertility Rate (TFR) for the country has been 2.3 in 2013. In rural areas it has been 2.5, and in urban areas it has been 1.8.<br /> <br /> <strong><em>Socio-economic indicators</em></strong><br /> <br /> &bull; Literacy rate stood at 73 percent in 2011. Literacy rate among females has been 64.6 percent and males has been 80.9 percent. Literacy rate in urban areas (84.1 percent) has been more as compared to the same in rural areas (67.8 percent). Literacy rate has been highest in Kerala (94 percent)<br /> <br /> &bull; The percentage of population below the poverty line (as per Tendulkar methodology) has been 21.9 percent in 2011-12. The percentage of population below the poverty line in rural areas has been 25.7 percent and in urban areas has been 13.7 percent.<br /> <br /> &bull; The per capita Net National Income at current prices increased almost 3 times from Rs. 24,143 in 2004-05 to Rs. 74,920 in 2013-14.<br /> <br /> &bull; The per capita per day net availability of cereals has increased from 386.2 gm in 2001 to 468.9 gm in 2013. Similarly, the per capita per day net availability of pulses has increased from 30 gm in 2001 to 41.9 gm in 2013.<br /> <br /> &bull; Slum population in India is projected to increase from 9.30 crore in 2011 to 10.47 crore in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; Of the total 1.34 crore residences in slums, nearly 58.5 percent are in good condition, 37.4 percent are in livable condition and 4.1 percent are in dilapidated condition.&nbsp;<br /> <br /> <strong><em>Health status </em></strong><br /> <br /> &bull; Based on available evidence, cardiovascular disease (24 percent), chronic respiratory disease (11 percent), cancer (6 percent) and diabetes (2 percent) are the leading cause of mortality in India.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of dengue cases in India has grown from 28,292 in 2010 to 40,425 in 2014. The total number of dengue related deaths stood at 131 in 2014.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of Japanese Encephalitis cases in India has grown from 555 in 2010 to 1,652 in 2014. The total number of Japanese Encephalitis related deaths stood at 292 in 2014.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of malaria cases in India has grown from nearly 16 lakh in 2010 to 10.71 lakh in 2014. The total number of malaria related deaths stood at 535 in 2014.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of Chikungunya fever cases in India has reduced from 48,176 in 2010 to 15,445 in 2014.&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; Nearly 47 percent of deliveries in India during 2012-13 were institutional whereas 52.3 percent deliveries took place at home.&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; Nearly 40.5 percent of children under 3 years of age were breastfed within an hour of birth in 2012-13.&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; At the national level, nearly 54 percent of children aged 12-23 months received full vaccination during 2012-13.<br /> <br /> &bull; The incidence of infanticide was 82 and foeticide was 210 in 2012.<br /> <br /> <strong><em>Health finance</em></strong><br /> <br /> &bull; Per capita public expenditure on health in nominal terms has gone up from Rs. 621 in 2009-10 to Rs. 1280 in 2014-15.<br /> <br /> &bull; Public expenditure on health as a percentage of GDP has gone up from 1.12 percent in 2009-10 to 1.26 percent in 2014-15.<br /> <br /> &bull; The Centre-state share in total public expenditure on health has changed from 36:64 in 2009-10 to 30:70 in 2014-15.<br /> <br /> &bull; Out-of-pocket (OOP) medical expenditure incurred during 2011-12 has been Rs. 146 per capita per month for urban India and Rs. 95 for rural India.<br /> <br /> &bull; Over 60 percent of total OOP health expenditure is on medicines, both in rural and urban India in 2011-12.<br /> <br /> &bull; As a share of total consumption expenditure, OOP expenditure on health has been 6.7 percent in rural India and 5.5 percent in urban India in 2011-12.<br /> <br /> &bull; Per capita OOP expenditure as well as the share of OOP in total consumption expenditure was positively correlated with consumption expenditure fractiles; higher fractiles had higher levels of both per capita OOP and share of OOP in consumption expenditure in 2011-12.<br /> <br /> &bull; Among all the states, Kerala had the highest per capita OOP medical expenditure as well as its share in total consumption expenditure in 2011-12.<br /> <br /> &bull; Around 22 crore individuals were covered under any health insurance in 2013-14. This means 18 percent of the population has been covered under any health insurance.<br /> <br /> <strong><em>Human resources in health sector</em></strong><br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of doctors possessing recognized medical qualification (under the IMC Act), registered with state medical councils or Medical Council of India, stood at 15,976 in 2014.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of dental surgeons registered with the Central/ State Dental Councils of India stood at 1.54 lakhs in 2014, which was 21,720 in 1994.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of Government allopathic doctors stood at 1.06 lakhs and the total number of Government dental surgeons stood at 5,614.<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 31 December, 2014, the total number of Auxiliary Nurse Midwives (ANMs) stood at 7.86 lakh, whereas Registered Nurses &amp; Registered Midwives (RN &amp; RM) stood at 17.8 lakhs and Lady Health Visitors (LHV) stood at 55,914.<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 27 June, 2014, the total number of pharmacists stood at 6.64 lakh.<br /> <br /> <strong><em>Health infrastructure</em></strong><br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of licensed blood banks in India as on February 2015 is 2760.<br /> <br /> &bull; There are 20,306 hospitals having 6.76 lakh beds in India. There are 16,816 hospitals in rural areas having 1.84 lakh beds and 3,490 hospitals in urban areas having 4.92 lakh beds.<br /> <br /> &bull; The number of medical colleges in India has more than doubled from 146 in 1991-92 to 398 in 2014-15.<br /> &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> The 71st round National Sample Survey on &ldquo;Social Consumption: Health&rdquo; was conducted during January to June 2014. The information in the survey was collected from 36,480 households in rural areas and 29,452 households in urban areas during the 71st round.<br /> <br /> The key findings of the [inside]71st round NSS report: Key Indicators of Social Consumption in India Health (published in June 2015)[/inside] are as follows (please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/nss_71st_ki_health_30june15.pdf" title="NSS 71st Round Health">click here</a> to access the full report; please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/NSS%20Press%20Release%20Health.pdf" title="NSS Press Note Health">click here</a> to read the summary of findings):<br /> <br /> <em>A. Non-hospitalized treatment</em><br /> <br /> &bull; The Proportion (per 1000) of Ailing Persons (PAP), measured as the number of living persons reporting ailments (per 1000 persons), was 89 persons in rural India and 118 persons in urban India.<br /> <br /> &bull; Inclination towards allopathy treatment was prevalent (around 90% in both the sectors). Only 5 to 7 percent usage of &lsquo;other&rsquo; including AYUSH (Ayurveda, Yoga or Naturopathy Unani, Siddha and homoeopathy) was reported both in rural and urban area. Moreover, un-treated spell was higher in rural (both for male and female) than urban areas.<br /> <br /> &bull; Private doctors were the most important single source of treatment in both the sectors (Rural &amp; Urban). More than 70 percent (72 per cent in the rural areas and 79 per cent in the urban areas) spells of ailment were treated in the private sector (consisting of private doctors, nursing homes, private hospitals, charitable institutions, etc.).<br /> <br /> <em>B. Hospitalized treatment</em><br /> <br /> &bull; Medical treatment of an ailing person as an in-patient in any medical institution having provision for treating the sick as in-patients, was considered as hospitalised treatment. In the urban population, 4.4 percent persons were hospitalised at some time during a reference period of 365 days. The proportion of persons hospitalised in the rural areas was lower (3.5 percent).<br /> <br /> &bull; It is observed that in rural India, 42 percent hospitalised treatment was carried out in public hospital and rest 58 percent in private hospital. For the urban India, the corresponding figures were 32 percent and 68 percent. It may be noted in this context that households (or persons within households) were segregated in sector (rural/urban) by their place of domicile, and not by the place of treatment.<br /> <br /> &bull; Preference towards allopathy treatment was observed in cases of hospitalised treatment as well.<br /> <br /> <em>C. Cost of treatment - as in-patient and other</em><br /> <br /> &bull; Average medical expenditure per hospitalisation case: Higher amount was spent for treatment per hospitalised case by people in the private hospitals (Rs. 25850) than in the public hospitals (Rs. 6120). The highest expenditure was recorded for treatment of Cancer (Rs. 56712) followed by that for Cardio-vascular diseases (Rs. 31647).<br /> <br /> &bull; Average medical expenditure per non-hospitalisation case was Rs. 509 in rural India and Rs. 639 in urban India.<br /> <br /> &bull; As much as 86 percent of rural population and 82 percent of urban population were still not covered under any scheme of health expenditure support. Government, however, was able to bring about 12 percent urban and 13 percent rural population under health protection coverage through Rastriya Swasthya Bima Yojana (RSBY) or similar plan. Only 12 percent households of the 5th quintile class (Usual Monthly Per Capita Consumer Expenditure) of urban area had some arrangement of medical insurance from private provider.<br /> <br /> <em>D. Incidence of childbirth, Expenditure on institutional childbirth</em><br /> <br /> &bull; In rural area 9.6% women (age 15-49) were pregnant at any time during the reference period of 365 days; for urban this proportion was 6.8%. Evidence of interrelation of place of childbirth with level of living is noted both in rural and urban areas. In the rural areas, about 20% of the childbirths were at home or any other place other than the hospitals. The same for urban areas was 10.5%. Among the institutional childbirth, 55.5% took place in public hospital and 24% in private hospital in rural area. In urban area, however, the corresponding figures were 42% and 47.5% respectively.<br /> <br /> &bull; An average of Rs. 5544 was spent per childbirth (as inpatient) in rural area and Rs. 11685 in urban area. The rural population spent, on an average, Rs. 1587 for the same in a public sector hospital and Rs. 14778 for one in a private sector hospital. The corresponding figures for urban India were Rs. 2117 and Rs. 20328.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> The key findings of the [inside]Draft National Health Policy 2015 (published in December 2014)[/inside], prepared by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare are as follows (Please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Draft%20National%20Health%20Policy%202015.pdf" title="Draft NHP 2015">click here</a> to download):<br /> <br /> &bull; The draft National Health Policy accepts and endorses the understanding that a full achievement of the goals and principles as defined would require an increased public health expenditure to 4% to 5% of the GDP. However, given that the NHP, 2002 target of 2% was not met, and taking into account the financial capacity of the country to provide this amount and the institutional capacity to utilize the increased funding in an effective manner, the present draft health policy proposes a potentially achievable target of raising public health expenditure to 2.5% of the GDP. It also notes that 40% of this would need to come from Central expenditures. At current prices, a target of 2.5% of GDP translates to Rs. 3800 per capita, representing an almost four fold increase in five years.<br /> <br /> &bull; The private sector today provides nearly 80% of outpatient care and about 60% of inpatient care. (The out-patient estimate would be significantly lower if we included only qualified providers. By NSSO estimates as much as 40% of the private care is likely to be by informal unqualified providers). 72% of all private health care enterprises are own-account-enterprises (OAEs), which are household run businesses providing health services without hiring a worker on a fairly regular basis.<br /> <br /> &bull; In terms of comparative efficiency, public sector is value for money as it accounts (based on the NSSO 60th round) for less than 30% of total expenditure, but provides for about 20% of outpatient care and 40% of in-patient care. This same expenditure also pays for 60% of end-of-life care (RGI estimates on hospital mortality), and almost 100% of preventive and promotive care and a substantial part of medical and nursing education as well.<br /> <br /> &bull; Thailand has almost the same total health expenditure as India but its proportion of public health expenditure is 77.7% of total health expenditures (which is 3.2% of the GDP) and this is spent through a form of strategic purchasing in which about 95% is purchased from public health care facilities- which is what gives it such a high efficiency. Brazil spends 9% of its GDP on health but of this public health expenditure constitutes 4.1% of the GDP (which is 45.7% of total health expenditure). This public health expenditure accounts for almost 75% of all health care provision. It would be ambitious if India could aspire to a public health expenditure of 4% of the GDP, but most expert groups have estimated 2.5% as being more realistic.<br /> <br /> &bull; As costs of care rise, affordability, as distinct from equity, requires emphasis. Health care costs of a household exceeding 10% of its total monthly consumption expenditures or 40% of its non-food consumption expenditure- is designated catastrophic health expenditures- and is declared as an unacceptable level of health care costs.<br /> <br /> &bull; Almost all hospitalization even in public hospitals leads to catastrophic health expenditures, and over 63 million persons are faced with poverty every year due to health care costs alone. It is because there is no financial protection for the vast majority of health care needs. In 2011-12, the share of out-of-pocket expenditure on health care as a proportion of total household monthly per capita expenditure was 6.9% in rural areas and 5.5% in urban areas. This led to an increasing number of households facing catastrophic expenditures due to health costs (18% of all households in 2011-12 as compared to 15% in 2004-05). Under NRHM, free care in public hospitals was extended to a select set of conditions &ndash; for maternity, newborn and infant care as part of the Janani Suraksha Yojana and, the Janani Shishu Suraksha Karyakram, and for disease control programmes. For all other services, user fees especially for diagnostics and &ldquo;outside prescriptions&rdquo; for drugs continued. Also, due to the selective approach, several essential services especially for chronic illness was not obtainable or at best only available at overcrowded district and medical college hospitals resulting in physical and financial hardship and poor quality of care.<br /> <br /> &bull; The Central Government under the Ministry of Labour &amp; Employment, launched the Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana (RSBY) in 2008. The population coverage under these various schemes increased from almost 55 million people in 2003-04 to about 370 million in 2014 (almost one-fourth of the population). Nearly two thirds (180 million) of this population are those in the Below Poverty Line (BPL) category. Evaluations show that schemes such as the RSBY, have improved utilization of hospital services, especially in private sector and among the poorest 20% of households and SC/ST households. However there are other problems. One problem is low awareness among the beneficiaries about the entitlement and how and when to use the RSBY card. Another is related to denial of services by private hospitals for many categories of illnesses, and over supply of some services.<br /> <br /> &bull; The private health care industry is valued at $40 billion and is projected to grow to $ 280 billion by 2020 as per market sources. The current growth rate of this perennially and most rapidly growing area of the economy, the healthcare industry, at 14% is projected to be 21% in the next decade. Even during the global recession of 2008, this sector remained relatively recession-proof. The private health care industry is complex and differentiated. It includes insurance and equipment, which accounts for about 15%, pharmaceuticals which accounts for over 25%, about 10% on diagnostics and about 50% is hospitals and clinical care. The private sector growth cannot be seen merely as a consequence of limited public sector investment. The Government has had an active policy in the last 25 years of building a positive economic climate for the health care industry. Amongst these measures are lower direct taxes; higher depreciation in medical equipment; Income Tax exemptions for 5 years for rural hospitals; custom duty exemptions for imported equipment that are lifesaving; Income Tax exemption for Health Insurance; and active engagement through publicly financed health insurance which now covers almost 27% of the population.<br /> <br /> &bull; Maternal mortality now accounts for 0.55% of all deaths and 4% of all female deaths in the 15 to 49 year age group.<br /> <br /> &bull; India is set to reach the Millennium Development Goals (MDG) with respect to maternal and child survival. The MDG target for Maternal Mortality Ratio (MMR) is 140 per 100,000 live births. From a baseline of 560 in 1990, the nation had achieved 178 by 2010-12, and at this rate of decline is estimated to reach an MMR of 141 by 2015.<br /> <br /> &bull; In the case of under-5 mortality rate (U5MR), the MDG target is 42. From a baseline of 126 in 1990, in 2012 the nation has an U5MR of 52 and an extrapolation of this rate would bring it to 42 by 2015. This is particularly creditable on a global scale where in 1990 India&#39;s MMR and U5MR were 47% and 40% above the international average respectively.<br /> <br /> &bull; Although over 90% of pregnant women receive one antenatal check up and 87% received full TT immunization, only about 68.7% of women have received the mandatory three antenatal check-ups. Again whereas most women had received iron and folic acid tablets, only 31% of pregnant women had consumed more than 100 IFA tablets. For institutional delivery, standard protocols are often not followed during labour and the postpartum period. Sterilization related deaths a preventable tragedy, are often a direct consequence of poor quality of care. Only 61% of children (12-23 months) have been fully immunized.<br /> <br /> &bull; In AIDS control, progress has been good with a decline from a 0.41% prevalence rate in 2001 to 0.27% in 2011 but this still leaves about 21 lakh persons living with HIV, with about 1.16 lakh new cases and 1.48 deaths in 2011. In tuberculosis the challenge is a prevalence of close to 211 cases and 19 deaths per 100,000 population and rising problems of multi-drug resistant tuberculosis. Though these are significant declines from the MDG baseline, India still contributes to 24% of all global new case detection.<br /> <br /> &bull; Over 75% of communicable diseases are not part of existing national programmes. Overall, communicable diseases contribute to 24.4% of the entire disease burden while maternal and neonatal ailments contribute to 13.8%. Non-communicable diseases (39.1%) and injuries (11.8%) now constitute the bulk of the country&#39;s disease burden. National Health Programmes for non-communicable diseases are very limited in coverage and scope, except perhaps in the case of the Blindness control programme.<br /> <br /> &bull; The gap between service availability and needs is widest in the case of mental illness- 43 facilities in the nation with a 0.47 psychologists per million people.<br /> <br /> &bull; The elderly i.e. the population above 60 years comprise 8.6% of the population (103.8 million) and they are also a vulnerable section. Those above 75 years (20.52 million) are most vulnerable and almost 8% of the elderly population is bed ridden or homebound (NSSO).<br /> <br /> **page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The report entitled [inside]Economic Burden of Tobacco Related Diseases in India[/inside] (please&nbsp;<a href="tinymce/uploaded/economic_burden_of_tobacco_related_diseases_in_india_executive_summary.pdf" title="Economic Burden of tobacco related diseases">click here</a>&nbsp;to download the Executive Summary), supported by the Ministry of Health &amp; Family Welfare, Government of India and the WHO Country Office for India, was developed by the Public Health Foundation of India (PHFI).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The report estimates direct and indirect costs from all diseases caused due to tobacco use and four specific diseases namely, respiratory diseases, tuberculosis, cardiovascular diseases and cancers. The report also highlights that tobacco use and the associated costs are creating an enormous burden for the nation.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The total economic costs attributable to tobacco use from all diseases in India in the year 2011 for persons aged 35-69 amounted to Rs. 104500 crores of which 16 percent was direct cost and 84 percent was indirect cost.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to the report, massive direct medical costs of tobacco attributable diseases amount to Rs.16,800 crore and associated indirect morbidity cost of Rs. 14,700 crore. The cost from premature mortality is Rs. 73,000 crores, indicating a substantial productive loss to the nation, the report states.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to the United Nations&#39; report (released in May, 2014) entitled [inside]Trends in maternal mortality estimates 1990 to 2013[/inside], (please&nbsp;<a href="tinymce/uploaded/Trends%20in%20Maternal%20Mortality%201990%20to%202013.pdf" title="Trends in Maternal Mortality 1990 to 2013">click here</a>&nbsp;to download):&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em><strong>Indian scenario</strong></em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Maternal mortality ratio (MMR)* in India stood at 560 maternal deaths (per 100000 live births) during 1990, 460 during 1995, 370 during 2000, 280 during 2005 and 190 during 2013.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; As compared to India (MMR: 190 per 100000 live births), Brazil (MMR: 69) and China (MMR: 32) performed better in reducing maternal deaths.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; An Indian woman&rsquo;s lifetime risk of maternal death** &ndash; the probability that a 15 year old woman will eventually die from a maternal cause &ndash; is 1 in 190, whereas for a Chinese woman it is 1 in 1800 and for a Brazilian woman it is 1 in 780.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; At the country level, the two countries that accounted for one third of all global maternal deaths are India at 17 percent (50000) and Nigeria at 14 percent (40000).&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The proportion of deaths among women of reproductive age that are due to maternal causes (PM)*** in India is 6.7 percent whereas for China it is 1.6 percent and for Brazil it is 2.8 percent.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The ten countries that comprised 58 percent of the global maternal deaths reported in 2013 are: India (50000, 17%); Nigeria (40000, 14%); Democratic Republic of the Congo (21000, 7%); Ethiopia (13000, 4%); Indonesia (8800, 3%); Pakistan (7900, 3%); United Republic of Tanzania (7900, 3%); Kenya (6300, 2%); China (5900, 2%); Uganda (5900, 2%).&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; India could reduce MMR by 65 percent between 1990 and 2013.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The present report has classified India among 96 countries with incomplete civil registration and/or other types of maternal mortality data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em><strong>Global scenario</strong></em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Every day, approximately 800 women die from preventable causes related to pregnancy and childbirth.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Under MDG5, countries committed to reducing maternal mortality by three quarters between 1990 and 2015. Since 1990, maternal deaths worldwide have dropped by 45%. However, between 1990 and 2013, the global maternal mortality ratio (i.e. the number of maternal deaths per 100 000 live births) declined by only 2.6% per year. This is far from the annual decline of 5.5% required to achieve MDG5.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; 99 percent of all maternal deaths occur in developing countries. More than half of these deaths occur in sub-Saharan Africa and almost one third occur in South Asia.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The maternal mortality ratio in developing countries in 2013 is 230 per 100 000 live births versus 16 per 100 000 live births in developed countries.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; A woman&rsquo;s lifetime risk of maternal death &ndash; the probability that a 15 year old woman will eventually die from a maternal cause &ndash; is 1 in 3700 in developed countries, versus 1 in 160 in developing countries.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Maternal mortality is higher in women living in rural areas and among poorer communities.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Young adolescents face a higher risk of complications and death as a result of pregnancy than older women.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The major complications that account for 80% of all maternal deaths are: a. severe bleeding (mostly bleeding after childbirth); b. infections (usually after childbirth); c. high blood pressure during pregnancy (pre-eclampsia and eclampsia); and d. unsafe abortion. The remainder are caused by or associated with diseases such as malaria, and AIDS during pregnancy. Skilled care before, during and after childbirth can save the lives of women and newborn babies.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; While levels of antenatal care have increased in many parts of the world during the past decade, only 46 percent of women in low-income countries benefit from skilled care during childbirth.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Other factors that prevent women from receiving or seeking care during pregnancy and childbirth are: poverty, distance, lack of information, inadequate services and cultural practices.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Note:&nbsp;</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">* Maternal mortality ratio (MMR) is the number of maternal deaths during a given time period per 100000 live births during the same time period.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">** Adult lifetime risk of maternal death is the probability that a 15-year-old women will die eventually from a maternal cause.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">*** Proportion of deaths among women of reproductive age that are due to maternal causes (PM) is the number of maternal deaths in a given time period divided by the total deaths among women aged 15&ndash;49 years.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Rural%20Health%20Statistics%20of%20India%202012.pdf" title="Rural Health Statistics of India 2012">click here</a> to access the latest edition of [inside]Rural Health Statistics in India 2012[/inside] that was released by the Union health ministry. The report provides detailed statistics on rural health infrastructure on the basis of information available up to March, 2012 and data provided by the States and Union Territories.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> According to the UNICEF report titled [inside]Committing to Child Survival: A Promise Renewed Progress Report 2013[/inside] (please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/APR_Progress_Report_2013_9_Sept_2013_1.pdf" title="UNICEF child mortality report">click here</a> to download):<br /> <br /> <strong><em>Indian scenario</em></strong><br /> <br /> &bull; Under Five Mortality Rate (Probability of dying between birth and exactly 5 years of age, expressed per 1,000 live births) in India for the year 2012, stands at 56 and India&#39;s ranking in terms of U5MR is 49. In 2012, the neonatal mortality rate (Probability of dying in the first month of life, expressed per 1,000 live births) at national level is at 31. The share of neonatal deaths in under-five deaths stood at 55 percent in 2012 as compared to 41 percent in 1990.&nbsp;&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; U5MR in India declined by 55 percent from 126 in 1990 to 56 in 2012. Infant Mortality Rate (Probability of dying between birth and exactly 1 year of age, expressed per 1,000 live births) declined from 88 in 1990 to 44 in 2012. Neonatal mortality rate declined from 51 in 1990 to 31 in 2012.&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; U5MR in India among boys declined from 121 in 1990 to 54 in 2012. U5MR in India among girls declined from 130 in 1990 to 59 in 2012.<br /> <br /> &bull; In 2012, 21 percent deaths among Indian children under 5 years of age occurred due to pneumonia, 10 percent due to diarrhoea, 1 percent due to malaria, 3 percent due to measles and 43 percent due to neonatal causes.<br /> <br /> &bull; Half of all under-five deaths occur in just five countries: India (22%), Nigeria (13%), Pakistan, the Democratic Republic of the Congo (each 6%) and China (4%).<br /> <br /> &bull; Around two-thirds of neonatal deaths occur in just 10 countries, with India accounting for more than one-quarter and Nigeria for a tenth. More than 4 in 10 of all neonatal deaths worldwide occur in just three countries: India, Nigeria, and Pakistan.<br /> <br /> &bull; More than half of the under-five deaths caused by pneumonia or diarrhoea occur in just four countries: India, Nigeria, Pakistan and the Democratic Republic of the Congo.<br /> <br /> &bull; The Governments of Ethiopia, India and the United States, together with the UN agency, launched in 2012 &lsquo;Committing to Child Survival: A Promise Renewed&#39;, a global effort to accelerate efforts to stop young children from dying from preventable causes. Some 176 governments have signed on, including those making some of the greatest strides in under-five mortality.<br /> <br /> &bull; In February 2013, the Government of India, another cosponsor of the global Call to Action, convened a national forum of state policymakers, technical advisors, civil society organizations and private-sector partners to identify and commit to high-impact strategies that can accelerate the decline in preventable child deaths.<br /> <br /> <strong><em>Global scenario</em></strong><br /> <br /> &bull; In 2012, around 6.6 million children died globally before their fifth birthday, at a rate of around 18,000 per day. Since 1990, 216 million children have died before their fifth birthday &mdash; more than the current total population of Brazil, the world&rsquo;s fifth most populous country.<br /> <br /> &bull; Of the 6.6 million under-five deaths globally in 2012, most were from preventable causes such as pneumonia, diarrhoea or malaria; around 44% of deaths in children under 5 occurred during the neonatal period. Pneumonia and diarrhoea remain leading causes of deaths among children under 5, killing almost 5,000 children under 5 every day. Malaria remains an important cause of child death, killing 1,200 children under 5 every day.<br /> <br /> &bull; Global progress in reducing child deaths since 1990 has been very significant. The global rate of under-five mortality has roughly halved, from 90 deaths per 1,000 live births in 1990 to 48 per 1,000 in 2012. The estimated annual number of under-five deaths has fallen from 12.6 million to 6.6 million over the same period.<br /> <br /> &bull; Put another way, 17,000 fewer children die each day in 2012 than did in 1990 &mdash; thanks to more effective and affordable treatments, innovative ways of delivering critical interventions to the poor and excluded, and sustained political commitment. These and other vital child survival interventions have helped to save an estimated 90 million lives in the past 22 years.<br /> <br /> &bull; The global annual rate of reduction in under-five deaths has steadily accelerated since 1990-1995, when it stood at 1.2%, more than tripling to 3.9% in 2005-2012. Both sub-Saharan African regions&mdash;particularly Eastern and Southern Africa but also West and Central Africa&mdash;have seen a consistent acceleration in reducing under-five deaths, particularly since 2000.<br /> <br /> &bull; At the current rate of reduction in under-five mortality, the world will only make MDG 4 by 2028 &mdash; 13 years after the deadline &mdash; and 35 million more children will die between 2015 and 2028 whose lives could be saved if we were able to make the goal on time in 2015 and continue that trend.<br /> <br /> &bull; Accelerating progress in child survival urgently requires greater attention to ending preventable child deaths in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia, which together account for 4 out of 5 under-five deaths globally.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to the [inside]Pneumonia Progress Report, 2012[/inside], released by IVAC and John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012.pdf" title="Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012">click here</a> to access:</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The 2000-2010 decade brought a significant reduction in overall child mortality, from 9.6 to 7.6 million. Pneumonia continues to be the number one killer of children around the world-causing 18% of all child mortality, an estimated 1.3 million child deaths in 2011 alone.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Nearly 99 percent of all pneumonia deaths occur in developing countries, and three-quarters take place in just 15 countries. The majority of pneumonia cases are preventable or treatable.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Pneumonia is the leading cause of child mortality in India, responsible for the deaths of nearly 400,000 &nbsp;children under five in 2010.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Percentage of Indian children with suspected pneumonia receiving antibiotics stood at 13 percent in 2010.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Percentage of under-five Indian children with suspected pneumonia taken to appropriate health-care provider stood at 69 percent in 2010.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Percentage of children receiving exclusive breastfeeding in first 6 months of life is 46 percent (as per latest available data during 2006-2010).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Vaccine coverage in the case of DTP3 (third dose of diphtheria and tetanus toxoid and pertussis vaccine) is 72 percent and in the case of measles is 74 percent in 2011.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; India and Nigeria, two large countries with the highest numbers of child deaths worldwide, remain low scorers with an average intervention coverage (interventions in terms of vaccination, breastfeeding, access to care and antibiotic treatment) rate of 55% and 40%, respectively.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; One notable area of progress in India is on coverage of two vaccines that can help prevent pneumonia, Hib vaccine and measles vaccine. While Hib vaccine uptake has been slow in India&rsquo;s public sector, momentum is now shifting following efforts by the Ministry of Health &amp; Family Welfare (MOHFW), states, health experts and advocates to prioritize implementation of the National Technical Advisory Group on Immunization&rsquo;s (NTAGI) recommendation to add Hib to the Universal Immunization Programme (UIP).&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Two Indian states, Tamil Nadu and Kerala, introduced Hib vaccines (in the form of the pentavalent vaccine) in December 2011, and six more are slated to do so by the end of 2012. At a recent Hib Symposium in the state of Odisha, MOHFW officials stated that at least twice as many additional states have expressed interest in the vaccine.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; India has joined other WHO Member States in introducing a second dose of measles vaccine into the UIP to ensure its children are protected from the virus, which contributes to the burden of pneumonia. Measles was once one of the leading causes of death in children, but global measles deaths have declined dramatically because of widespread coverage with two doses of measles vaccine. India began a phased introduction of the second dose in 2010; by the end of the first year, the second dose of measles vaccine had been added to routine immunization in 21 states and catch-up campaigns were completed in 197 districts in 14 states.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to the report titled: [inside]Defeating malaria in Asia, the Pacific, Americas, Middle East and Europe, November, 2012[/inside], which has been produced by World Health Organization and PATH,&nbsp;<a href="http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Defeating%20malaria.pdf">http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Defeating%20malaria.pdf</a>: &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The Indian Commission on Macroeconomics and Health notes that, in India, 13 household person-days per patient were lost per episode of malaria. Furthermore, the commission estimated that the overall monetary losses to families (income losses together with treatment expenses) could amount to between 200 and 400 Indian rupees (US$ 3.5 to 7).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; With an estimated 22.5 million malaria cases in India, this translates to an annual cost of US$ 79 to 157 million, or 0.01% of gross domestic product each year.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In states with the highest incidence rates, such as Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Meghalaya, Mizoram, and Orissa, the annual cost of illness represents more than 0.1% of a gross state income.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Tribal populations living in forests in Orissa, India, have incidence rates that are almost 10 times higher than in the plains.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Odisha is one of the most highly malaria-endemic states in India, accounting for 24% of reported cases in 2010 despite consisting of less of than 4% of the national population. Malaria is particularly common among tribal groups which represent 44% of the population of Orissa.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; A study in Sundargarh District of Odisha showed that forest areas had an annual incidence of 280 cases per 1000 population compared to 30 cases per 1000 on the plains. Approximately 84% of infections in forest areas were due to P. falciparum compared to 69% in plain areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Malaria&rsquo;s main victims tend to be poorer populations living in rural communities, with limited or no access to long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; WHO estimates that 216 million cases of malaria occurred globally in 2010; 34 million (16%) of these occurred outside of Africa of which 18.1 million (53%) were due to P. falciparum.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; WHO estimates that 655 000 deaths occurred globally, of which 46 000 (7%) occurred outside of Africa. WHO estimates that 2.5 billion people were at risk of malaria outside of Africa.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; There are 98 countries with ongoing transmission of malaria. Of these, 47 lie on the African continent, 21 are in the Americas, and 30 in Europe, Asia, and the Pacific. Of the 98 countries, 81 are in the control phase, 8 in the pre-elimination phase, and 9 in the elimination phase.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; While the disease burden has been declining in countries with fewer malaria cases and deaths, progress has been slower in countries where the bulk of the disease burden lies: India, Indonesia, Myanmar, Pakistan, and Papua New Guinea. These five high-burden countries account for 89% of all malaria cases in the region.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Malaria transmission occurs in 17 countries of Asia. Approximately 2 billion people in the region live at some risk of malaria, of which 525 million live at high risk (reported incidence more than 1 case per 1000 population per year).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Most reported cases of malaria in Asia are due to P. falciparum although the proportion varies considerably by country; it exceeds 80% in the Lao People&rsquo;s Democratic Republic, Myanmar, Timor-Leste, and Viet Nam, while transmission is exclusively due to P. vivax in the Democratic People&rsquo;s Republic of Korea and the Republic of Korea.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Insecticide resistance has now been reported in 24 out of 51 countries with malaria transmission outside of Africa.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to [inside]Children in India 2012-A Statistical Appraisal[/inside], Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, GoI, please <a href="https://im4change.org/docs/659Children_in_India_2012.pdf">click here</a> to access:</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em><strong>Neonatal Mortality Rate</strong></em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2010, the neonatal mortality rate (Probability of dying in the first month of life, expressed per 1,000 live births) at national level is at 33 and ranges from 19 in urban areas to 36 in rural areas. Among bigger states, neo-natal mortality rate is highest in Madhya Pradesh (44) and lowest in Kerala (7).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The rural&ndash;urban gap in neo natal mortality rate was highest in Andhra Pradesh and Assam (23 points), followed by Rajasthan (22 points). The rural &ndash;urban gap in neo natal mortality rate lowest in Kerala (3 points), followed by Tamil Nadu (6 points).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Factors which affect fetal and neonatal deaths are primarily endogenous, while those which affect post neonatal deaths are primarily exogenous. The endogenous factors are related to the formation of the foetus in the womb and are therefore, mainly biological in nature. Among the biological factors affecting fetal and neonatal infant mortality rates the important ones are the age of the mother, birth order, period of spacing between births, prematurity, weight at birth, mothers health.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em><strong>Infant Mortality Rate&nbsp;</strong></em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Infant Mortality Rate (Probability of dying between birth and exactly 1 year of age, expressed per 1,000 live births) has declined for males from 78 in 1990 to 46 in 2010 and for females the decline was from 81 to 49 during this period.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Infant Mortality Rate for the country as a whole declined from 66 in 2001 to 47 in 2010. With the present improved trend due to sharp fall during 2008-09, the national level estimate of infant mortality rate is likely to be 44 against the MDG target of 27 in 2015.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Infant Mortality Rate has declined in urban areas from 50 in 1990 to 31 in 2010, whereas in rural areas Infant Mortality Rate has declined from 86 to 51 during the same period.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Infant Mortality Rate in 2010, was lowest in Goa (10) followed by Kerala (13) and Manipur (14). The States of Madhya Pradesh (62), Orissa (61), Uttar Pradesh (61), Assam (58), Meghalaya (55), Rajasthan (55), Chhattisgarh (51), Bihar (48) and Haryana (48) reported infant mortality rate above the national average (47).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Among infants, the main causes of death are: Certain Conditions Originating in the Perinatal Period (67.2%), Certain infectious and Parasitic diseases (8.3%), Diseases of the Respiratory System (7.7%), Congenial Malformations, Deformations &amp; chromosomal Abnormalities (3.3%), Other causes (10.6%).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em><strong>Under Five Mortality Rate&nbsp;</strong></em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Under Five Mortality Rate (Probability of dying between birth and exactly 5 years of age, expressed per 1,000 live births) in India for the year 2010, stands at 59 and it varies from 66 in rural areas to 38 in Urban areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Under Five Mortality Rate stood at 64 for females whereas it is 55 for males in 2010.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Under Five Mortality Rate varies from lowest in Kerala (15), followed by 27 in Tamil Nadu to alarmingly high level in Assam (83), followed by Madhya Pradesh (82), Uttar Pradesh (79) and Odisha (78).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Given to reduce Under Five Mortality Rate to 42 per thousand live births by 2015, India tends to reach near to 52 by that year missing the target by 10 percentage points.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Among children aged 0 to 4 years, the main causes of death are: Certain infectious and Parasitic Diseases (23.1%), Diseases of the Respiratory System (16.1%), Diseases of the Nervous System (12.1%), Diseases of the Circulatory System (7.9%), Injury, Poisoning etc (0.9%), Other major causes (33.9 %).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em><strong>Immunization</strong></em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; At national level, 61% of the children aged 12-23 months have received full immunization in 2009. The coverage of immunization was higher in urban areas (67.4%) as compared to that in the rural areas (58.5%).&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Nearly 8% Indian children did not receive even a single vaccine in 2009. Nearly 62% of the male children aged 12-23 months have received full immunization, while among the females it was nearly 60%.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; 76.6 percent of children aged 12-23 months received full immunization coverage whose mothers had 12 or more years of education whereas 45.3 percent of children whose mothers had no education got full immunization.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; About 75.5% of children of less than one year belonging to the highest wealth index group are fully immunized while only 47.3% from the lowest quintile are fully immunized.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The full immunization coverage of children age 12-23 months is highest in Goa (87.9%), followed by Sikkim (85.3%), Punjab (83.6%), and Kerala (81.5%). The full immunization coverage is lowest in Arunachal Pradesh (24.8%).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to [inside]WHO Global Report: Mortality Attributable to Tobacco (2012)[/inside], please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Mortality%20due%20to%20tobacco.pdf" title="Mortality due to tobacco">click here</a> to access:&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Globally 12% of all deaths among adults aged 30 years and over were attributed to tobacco as compared with 16% in India, 17% in Pakistan and 31% in Bangladesh.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In India, the death rate from non-communicable diseases (NCDs) [1096 per 100,000 population] was about 3.3 times that for communicable diseases [336 per 100,000]. Tobacco was responsible for 9% of all NCDs as compared with 2% of all communicable disease related deaths.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The death rate due to tobacco in Indian men was 206 [per 100,000 men aged 30 years and over] as compared with 13 [per 100,000 women aged 30 years and over] for women. The proportion of deaths attributable to tobacco was almost 12% for men and 1% for women in India. &nbsp; &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Within the NCDs, ischaemic heart disease accounted for 329 deaths per 100,000 population aged 30 years and over, with 5% of these deaths attributed to tobacco in India. Cancer of the trachea, bronchus and lung accounted for 16 deaths per 100,000 population but with 58% of these deaths attributed to tobacco.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Within the communicable disease group, deaths attributed to tobacco accounted for 5% of all lower respiratory infection deaths and 4% of all tuberculosis deaths in India. &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The regions with the highest proportion of deaths atrributable to tobacco are the Americas and the European regions where tobacco has been used for a longer period of time.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; 71% of all lung cancer deaths globally are attributable to tobacco use. 42% of all chronic deaths globally are attributable to tobacco use.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Direct tobacco smoking is currently responsible for the death of about 5 million people worldwide each year with many deaths occuring prematurely. An additional 600,000 people are estimated to die from the effects of second-hand smoke.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In next 2 decades, the annual death from tobacco globally is expected to rise to over 8 million, with more than 80% of those deaths projected to occur in low-and middle-income countries.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; If effective measures are not urgently taken, tpbacco could in the 21st century kill over 1 billion people worldwide. Tobacco kills more than tuberculosis, HIV/ AIDS and malaria combined.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to the report titled [inside]The Growing Danger of Non-Communicable Diseases: Acting Now to Reverse Course (2011)[/inside], September, The World Bank, please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/The%20Growing%20Danger%20of%20Non-Communicable%20Diseases.pdf" title="The Growing Danger of Non-Communicable Diseases">click here</a> to access:</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> &bull; Heart disease, cancer, diabetes, chronic respiratory conditions, and other non-communicable diseases (NCDs) increasingly threaten the physical health and economic security of many lower-and middle-income countries.<br /> <br /> &bull; The change in mortality and disease levels will be particularly substantial in Sub-Saharan Africa, where NCDs will account for 46 percent of all deaths by 2030, up from 28 percent in 2008, and in South Asia, which will see the share of deaths from NCDs increase from 51 to 72 percent during the same period. More than 30 percent of these deaths will be premature and preventable. These lower-income countries will, at the same time, continue to grapple with the widespread prevalence of communicable diseases such as HIV, malaria, tuberculosis, and mother and child conditions, and so face a &ldquo;double burden&rdquo; of disease not experienced by their wealthier counterparts.<br /> <br /> &bull; The potential cost of NCDs to economies, health systems, households and individuals in middle- and lower-income countries is high. In many middle- and lower-income countries, NCDs are affecting populations at younger ages, resulting in longer periods of ill-health, premature deaths and greater loss of productivity that is so vital for development.<br /> <br /> &bull; Much of the rise in NCDs in developing countries is attributable to modifiable risk factors such as physical inactivity, malnutrition in the first thousand days of life and later an unhealthy diet (including excessive salt, fat, and sugar intake), tobacco use, alcohol abuse, and exposure to environmental pollution.<br /> <br /> &bull; Country evidence suggests that more than half of the NCD burden could be avoided through effective health promotion and disease prevention programs that tackle such risk factors. Particularly effective at very low costs are measures to curb tobacco, such as taxes, as indicated in the &ldquo;WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control&rdquo;, and to reduce salt in processed and semi processed foods.<br /> <br /> &bull; By 2030, cancer incidence is projected to increase by 70 percent in middle-income countries and 82 percent in lower-income countries.<br /> <br /> &bull; While increases in NCD-related mortality and ill-health in part reflect countries&rsquo; successes in extending lives and curbing communicable diseases, a significant part of the increase is a result of modifiable risk factors, many of which are linked to modernization, urbanization, and lifestyle changes.<br /> <br /> &bull; The rise of NCDs amongst younger populations may jeopardize many countries&rsquo; &ldquo;demographic dividend&rdquo;, including the economic benefits expected to be generated during the period when a relatively larger part of the population is of working age. Instead, these countries will have to contend with the costs associated with populations that are living with longer episodes of illhealth.<br /> <br /> &bull; Cardiovascular disease is already a major cause of death and disability in South Asia, where the average age of first-time heart attack sufferers is 53 compared to 59 in the rest of the world.<br /> <br /> &bull; A recent study illustrated the economic impact of NCDs in India by estimating that if NCDs were &ldquo;eliminated&rdquo;, the country&rsquo;s 2004 GDP would have been 4 to 10 percent greater.<br /> <br /> &bull; The share of out-of-pocket household health expenditures on NCDs in India increased from 32 percent to 47 percent between 1995&ndash;1996 and 2004. Moreover, 40 percent of these expenditures were financed by borrowing and sales of assets, increasing the household&rsquo;s financial vulnerability. NCDs also increase the risk of households incurring &ldquo;catastrophic&rdquo; health costs. In South Asia, the chance of incurring catastrophic hospitalization expenditures was 160 percent higher for cancer patients and 30 percent higher for those with cardiovascular diseases than it was for those with a communicable disease requiring hospitalization .<br /> <br /> &bull; Because of their specific characteristics, NCDs affect adults&mdash;often in their productive years, require costly long term treatment and care, and often are accompanied by some degree of disability. Therefore, they could potentially have greater socio-economic impact than other health conditions. Increased NCD levels can: reduce labor supply and outputs, increase costs to employers (from absenteeism and higher health care coverage costs), lower returns on human capital investments, reduced domestic consumption and lower tax revenues, as well as increased public health and social welfare expenditures.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to the report titled: [inside]AIDS at 30: Nations at the crossroads (2011)[/inside], which has been brought out by UNAIDS, please <a href="http://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/media_asset/aids-at-30_1.pdf">click here</a> to access:&nbsp;&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; The number of people living with HIV was around 34 million worldwide in 2010.<br /> <br /> &bull; There were 2.6 million new HIV infections worldwide in 2009.<br /> <br /> &bull; Between 1981 and 2000, the number of people living with HIV rose from less than one million to an estimated 27.5 million [26&ndash;29 million].<br /> <br /> &bull; Low- and middle-income countries accounted for 95% or more of the global HIV burden by 1998.<br /> <br /> &bull; While less than 1% of adults in South Africa were living with HIV in 1990, 16.1% were living with HIV a decade later. During the same period, adult HIV prevalence rose from less than 1% to 24.5% in Lesotho, and from 3.5% to 26% in Botswana.<br /> <br /> &bull; Half of HIV infections in Eastern Europe and Central Asia in 2010 were due to drug users sharing needles.<br /> <br /> &bull; Clinical trials show that male circumcision reduces the chance of men becoming HIV-positive by about 60%.<br /> <br /> &bull; Beginning in 2005, a series of randomized controlled trials in sub-Saharan Africa found that circumsising adult men reduced their risk of infection by about 60%.<br /> <br /> &bull; Scientific knowledge about HIV expanded steadily in the years 1981&ndash;2000. The virus was identified in 1983, and the first serologic test became available in 1985. In the 1990s, studies demonstrated in developed and low- and middle-income countries the possibility of significantly lowering the risk of vertical transmission.<br /> <br /> &bull; Today, 94% of countries (162 of 172 countries reporting) have national HIV strategic plans, up from 87% in 2006. The coordination of national responses also improved during the epidemic&rsquo;s third decade. Two out of three (67%) countries in 2010 reported having a single HIV monitoring and evaluation system, up from 46% in 2006, although country reports cite insufficient coordination of diverse partners as a continuing challenge to national responses.<br /> <br /> &bull; According to the latest UNGASS reports, AIDS expenditures in 2009 totalled US$ 1.07 billion. Estimates based on the methodology suggested by the Commission on AIDS in Asia indicate that US$ 3.3 billion is needed for a targeted response across the region.<br /> <br /> &bull; There was a significant increase in investment in the HIV response in low- and middle-income countries between 2001 and 2009, with total expenditure rising nearly 10-fold, from US$ 1.6 billion to US$ 15.9 billion.<br /> <br /> &bull; Public and private domestic resources accounted for 52% of total spending on HIV programmes in low- and middle-income countries in 2009, but many low-income countries remain heavily dependent on external financing. In 56 countries, international donors supply at least 70% of HIV resources. This pattern potentially encourages the emergence of new global inequities, as millions of people in sub-Saharan Africa now rely on external donors on a daily basis for the drugs and services that keep them alive.<br /> <br /> &bull; The UNAIDS Domestic Investment Priority Index, a formula that accounts for total HIV burden and government resources, shows that eight of 14 countries in West and Central Africa, six of 16 countries in Eastern and Southern Africa, and all but four countries in Asia were allocating inadequate resources to HIV in&nbsp; 2009.<br /> <br /> &bull; According to research from nine countries under the People Living with HIV Stigma Index, 53% of Rwandans living with HIV have been verbally insulted, 33% of rural Zambians living with HIV have experienced physical violence, and 65% of Rwandans living with HIV have lost a job or income opportunity. Furthermore, women living with HIV from various countries report abuses of their sexual and reproductive health and rights. Nearly 20% of women in Namibia who participated in discussions and interviews with the International Community of Women Living with HIV (ICW), reported that they had been coerced or forced into sterilization. Such deep-seated social ostracism and discriminatory actions discourage people from being tested for HIV or seeking other needed services.<br /> <br /> &bull; Among young women in South Africa, experience of intimate partner violence increases the odds of becoming infected with HIV by 11.9%, while gender inequality within a relationship increases the risk by 13.9%, according to a study reported in The Lancet in 2010.<br /> <br /> &bull; According to the UNAIDS Global Report 2010, the proportion of countries reporting programmes to address stigma and discrimination increased from 39% in 2006 to 92% in 2010, although a budget for these programmes was in place in less than half of these countries.<br /> <br /> &bull; More than 56 countries have laws that specifically criminalize HIV transmission or exposure, with the majority of prosecutions reported in high-income countries. As of April 2011, 47 countries, territories and areas imposed some form of restriction on the entry, stay and residence of people living with HIV. However, in a more positive development, China, Namibia and USA lifted their HIV-related travel restrictions in 2010, while Ecuador and India clarified that no such restrictions were in place.<br /> <br /> &bull; In 116 countries, territories and areas, some aspect of sex work is criminalized. Seventy-nine countries and territories worldwide criminalize consensual same-sex sexual relations, including 85% of countries in Eastern and Southern Africa, 81% in the Middle East and North Africa, and 69% in the Caribbean.<br /> <br /> &bull; Thirty-two countries have laws that allow for the death penalty for drug-related offences, and 27 provide for the compulsory detention of people who use drugs, often without due process or minimum standards of detention or treatment. Such laws, as well as abusive law enforcement and poor access to legal services, deter individuals from seeking needed services, increase their vulnerability to becoming HIV-positive, and intensify their social isolation.<br /> <br /> &bull; As of December 2010, an estimated 6.6 million people in low- and middle-income countries were receiving antiretroviral therapy, an increase of 1.4 million from a year earlier. Between 2001 and 2010, the number of people receiving antiretroviral treatment rose nearly 22-fold, a vivid illustration of the power of international solidarity, innovative approaches and people-centred responses.<br /> <br /> &bull; In sub-Saharan Africa the number of people receiving antiretroviral treatment in 2010 increased by 31%; in the Middle East and North Africa, that figure was 21%.<br /> <br /> &bull; As of December 2009, seven countries had already reached at least 80% of treatment-eligible individuals with antiretroviral treatment. Eighteen countries reported treatment coverage of at least 60%.<br /> <br /> &bull; Since its emergence in 1996, highly active anti retroviral therapy has saved an estimated 14.4 million life years worldwide as of December 2009. Although 54% of life-years saved between 1995 and 2009 were in Western Europe and North America, where antiretroviral therapy has long been available, 3.7 million life-years have been saved in sub-Saharan Africa. The pace of reducing morbidity and mortality in sub-Saharan Africa has accelerated since 2005 as a result of dramatic programme scale-up.<br /> <br /> &bull; In 2009, nearly one in five people (18%) who started antiretroviral therapy in low- and middle-income countries were no longer in care 12 months later.<br /> <br /> &bull; At present, more than 95% of patients on treatment are on first-generation antiretroviral medicines, the majority of which are off-patent. As drug resistance increases over time, more patients will require second- and third-generation medicines. Most of these more recent medicines will remain under patent protection for years to come, resulting in potentially drastic increases in treatment costs. This can be alleviated to a large extent by making use of the flexibilities of public health related TRIPS (trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights). In March 2011, UNAIDS, WHO and UNDP issued a policy brief calling on all countries to use TRIPS flexibilities to lower costs and improve access to HIV treatment. By 2005, five years after affordable means of preventing vertical transmission became available, only 15% of HIV-positive pregnant women in low- and middle-income countries received antiretroviral prophylaxis.<br /> <br /> &bull; More than 50% of pregnant women who tested positive for HIV in 2010 were assessed for their eligibility to receive antiretroviral therapy for their own health. These gains in reducing vertical transmission have helped to reduce childhood mortality. The number of children newly infected with HIV in 2009 (370 000 [230 000&ndash;510 000]) was 26% lower than in 2001.<br /> <br /> &bull; According to the most recent population-based surveys in low- and middle-income countries with available data, only 24% of young women and 36% of young men responded correctly when asked five questions about HIV prevention methods and popular misconceptions about HIV transmission. Young women tend to be less likely than young men to be aware of the prevention benefits of consistent condom use. When prompted, 74% of young males in DHS surveys knew that using a condom helps to prevent HIV infection, while only 49% of young females knew the right answer. Some 78% of young males also knew that having a single, faithful partner lowers the risk of HIV infection, compared to only 59% of young females.<br /> <br /> &bull; In 14 countries where HIV prevalence exceeds 2% and where nationally representative data are available, more than 70% of men and women who had high-risk sex in the past year report not using a condom the last time they had sex.<br /> <br /> &bull; Globally, HIV prevalence levels above those reported in the general population have been documented among men who have sex with men (MSM), transgender people, people who inject drugs (IDUs), and sex workers.<br /> <br /> &bull; According to the most recently available data, the proportion of countries reporting that they conduct systematic surveillance of HIV among key populations increased between 2008 and 2010: for sex workers, from 44% to 50%; for MSM, from 30% to 36%; while among IDUs it remained stable at 28%.<br /> <br /> &bull; An estimated 20% of the 15.9 million IDUs worldwide are living with HIV. This statistic underscores the world&rsquo;s failure to put the lessons of harm reduction to use. In at least 69 countries where injecting drug use has been documented, no programme to provide even sterile needles and syringes exists.<br /> <br /> &bull; The epidemic among MSM communities is a worldwide phenomenon, with 63 out of 67 countries reporting in 2009 a higher HIV prevalence among MSM compared with the general population.<br /> <br /> &bull; At least 79 countries, territories and areas have laws against male&ndash;male sexual contact, including some that authorize the death penalty.<br /> <br /> &bull; Among 56 countries reporting in both 2008 and 2010, median condom use with the most recent client reached 84%, with a range from about two thirds to nearly 100%.<br /> <br /> &bull; According to recent estimates, HIV is a leading cause of pregnancyrelated deaths, accounting for about 11% of all maternal deaths in 2008.<br /> <br /> &bull; HIV-positive newborns have about a 50% risk of death before age two in the absence of treatment.<br /> <br /> &bull; In 2009, HIV accounted for 2.1% (1.2&ndash;3.0%) of under-five deaths in low- and middle-income countries, a decline from 2.6% (1.6&ndash;3.5%) in 2000.<br /> <br /> &bull; In sub-Saharan Africa, HIV was responsible for 3.6% (2.0&ndash;5.0%) of all deaths in children under five in 2009. Here, too, striking achievements are evident, as the HIV share of all under-five deaths has sharply fallen from the 5.4% (3.3%&ndash;7.3%) reported in 2000.<br /> <br /> &bull; Universal access to effective prevention, diagnosis and treatment for HIV-related tuberculosis (TB) could prevent up to one million TB deaths in people living with HIV between now and 2015, but the world is falling far short of this target.<br /> <br /> &bull; Only 28% of TB patients globally knew their HIV status in 2009, and only 5% of people living with HIV were screened for TB. Although early initiation of antiretroviral therapy significantly reduces the risk of death among HIV-positive people with TB, only 37% of these HIV-positive TB patients got HIV therapy in 2009.<br /> <br /> &bull; According to data compiled by WHO, 10 countries accounted for more than 69% of all people with HIV-related TB in 2009.<br /> <br /> &bull; 25% of all TB deaths are in people with HIV, and there are one million cases of TB in people with HIV a year.<br /> <br /> &bull; Between 2001 and 2009, global HIV incidence steadily declined, with the annual rate of new infections falling by nearly 25%.<br /> <br /> &bull; Above-average declines in HIV incidence have occurred in sub-Saharan Africa and in South and South-East Asia, while Latin America and the Caribbean and Oceania regions experienced more modest reductions of less than 25%.<br /> <br /> &bull; Rates of new infections have remained relatively stable in East Asia, Western and Central Europe, and North America. HIV incidence has steadily increased in the Middle East and North Africa, while in Eastern Europe and Central Asia, a decline in new infections was reversed mid-decade, with incidence rising slightly from 2005 to 2009.<br /> <br /> &bull; Coverage of services to prevent new child infections increased from 15% in 2005 to 54% in 2009. The HIV incidence rate declined by more than 25% between 2001 and 2009. Antiretroviral treatment coverage is increasing.<br /> <br /> &bull; Some 22.5 million people now live with HIV in Africa. The majority (60%) are women and girls. HIV prevalence is as high as 25% in some countries, and the rate of people becoming newly infected outpaces treatment access. Of the 16.6 million children globally who have lost one or both parents to an AIDS-related illness, 14.9 million are in Africa.<br /> <br /> &bull; The Asia Pacific region has made significant progress in controlling HIV&rsquo;s spread. The number of people living with HIV has remained stable for the past five years and estimated new infections are 20% lower than in 2001. Thailand, Cambodia and certain parts of India have turned their epidemics around by providing quality services to their key populations at higher risk.<br /> <br /> &bull; In 2009, median reported prevention coverage for people who inject drugs was 17%; for men who have sex with men 36.5%; and for female sex workers 41%. Programmes in key affected populations to prevent transmission to intimate sexual partners are severely lacking.<br /> <br /> **page**<br /> &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Please <a href="https://im4change.org/hunger-hdi/sdgs-113.html?pgno=5#trends-in-maternal-mortality-1990-to-2008-estimates">click here</a> to access the Trends in Maternal Mortality: 1990 to 2008 Estimates developed by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA and The World Bank:</span><br /> &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">According to [inside]A Fair Chance at Life: Why Equity Matters for Children (2010)[/inside], which has been prepared by Save the Children, please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/A%20fair%20chance%20of%20life.pdf" title="A fair chance of life">click here</a> to access:</span><br /> <span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp; </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;In 2000, the world&rsquo;s governments committed themselves to make a two-thirds reduction in the child mortality rate by 2015 &ndash; the fourth of eight United Nations Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). But with five years to go before the target date, the world is collectively off track to reach MDG 4. Just 40% of the necessary progress has been achieved so far, and in three-quarters of countries the goal will be missed on current trends.&nbsp; </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The child mortality rate at a global level has fallen by just 28% since the MDG baseline year of 1990, far short of the 67% reduction required to meet the goal. Less than 30% of countries are making equitable progress towards MDG 4.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Ghana, Mozambique, Niger, Egypt, Indonesia, Bolivia and Zambia have made equitable progress in reducing child mortality. Chad, Congo, Kenya, South Africa and Zimbabwe have actually seen increases in their child mortality rates since 1990. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;In sub-Saharan Africa, close to one child in seven still dies before their fifth birthday. Although the mortality rate in sub-Saharan Africa has fallen, high fertility levels mean that the absolute number of child deaths in the region has increased since 1990, from 4.2 to 4.6 million.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Almost all child deaths &ndash; 99% &ndash; happen in the developing world. A person born in sub-Saharan Africa can expect to live, on average, 52 years. In western Europe, life expectancy is 80 years. The life expectancy rates in sub-Saharan Africa today have not been seen in Europe since the beginning of the 20th century. In 40 developing countries, children have less chance of living to the age of five than a person in the UK has of living to the age of 65.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Sri Lanka &ndash; with a per capita income of $1,790 &ndash; has a child mortality rate of 13, less than half the level in Guatemala, which has a per capita income of $2,680. Gabon has an equivalent per capita income to Argentina, but a child mortality rate of 57, almost four times higher.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;In India, high levels of selective abortion contribute to skewed male-to-female birth ratios. Son preference in India and China can result in high mortality among girls because they are not adequately breastfed or given the same access to medical treatment. A study of 4,000 children aged between one and two in India found that the likelihood of girls being fully vaccinated was five percentage points lower than that for boys. In Gujarat, India, 50% of women feel they need the permission of their husband or parent-in-law before taking their sick child to a doctor.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;High child mortality, illness and malnutrition can be a brake on economic and social development. Children who are sick and undernourished, especially in the first two years of life, often pay a life-long and irreversible price in terms of physical stunting and reduced cognitive ability.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;On the positive side, of the 68 &lsquo;Countdown to 2015&rsquo; countries (which together account for 97% of maternal and child deaths worldwide), 60 have reduced child mortality since 1990. A recent study found that the rate of reduction has accelerated since 2000, compared with the period from 1990 to 2000.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Of the 68 &lsquo;Countdown to 2015&rsquo; priority countries, only 19 are on-track to reach MDG 4. Eleven more are making faster-than-average progress, but still not enough progress to achieve MDG 4 by 2015.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;It is estimated that children under five make up 85% of those who die as a result of climate change; 44% of child deaths happen in countries considered fragile; and nearly 70% of the countries with the highest child mortality burden are currently experiencing or have experienced armed violence in the last two decades.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Inadequate care before birth and during delivery contributes to 40% of child deaths. Even babies who survive the neonatal period (up to 28 days) have greatly reduced chances of surviving beyond the age of five if their mothers die, in part because they are less likely to receive adequate nutrition and healthcare.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Although the percentage of stunted children decreased globally from 40% to 27% between 1990 and 2010, the number of stunted children is projected to increase in many areas. In Africa, the number of stunted children is estimated to have increased from 45 million in 1990 to 60 million in 2010.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Undernutrition among pregnant women in developing countries leads to one in six infants being born with low birth weight, which not only carries a high risk of neonatal death, but can also permanently damage long-term cognitive and physical development.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Infectious diseases accounted for an estimated 68% of the 8.8 million child deaths in 2008, with pneumonia accounting for 18% and diarrhoea for 15% of the global total. More than 40% of deaths from pneumonia and diarrhoea take place in sub-Saharan Africa, where 42% of people lack access to an improved water source, and almost 70% are without adequate sanitation.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Improved drinking water sources and proper sanitation are crucial to reducing child deaths from diarrhoea, while an estimated 45% of cases could be prevented by simple hand washing with soap.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;If women and men had equal status, it is estimated that the proportion of underweight children below the age of three years would fall by 13 percentage points globally.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">According to [inside]Women on the Front Lines of Health Care, State of the World&#39;s Mothers 2010[/inside], </span><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Women%20on%20the%20front%20line.pdf" title="Women on the front line">click here</a> to access</span><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">: </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Every year, 50 million women in the developing world give birth with no professional help and 8.8 million children and newborns die from easily preventable or treatable causes. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Worldwide, there are 57 countries with critical health workforce shortages, meaning that they have fewer than 23 doctors, nurses and midwives per 10,000 people. Thirty-six of these countries are in sub-Saharan Africa. Making up for these shortages would require an additional 2.4 million doctors, nurses and midwives.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Thirty-six of the countries with critical health worker shortages are in sub-Saharan Africa, which has 12 percent of the world&rsquo;s population, 25 percent of the global burden of disease, and only 3 percent of the world&rsquo;s health workers. South and East Asia have 29 percent of the disease burden and only 12 percent of the health workers.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;41 percent of the child deaths occur among newborn babies in the first month of life.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;99 percent of child and maternal deaths occur in developing countries where mothers and children lack access to basic health-care services.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;250,000 women&rsquo;s lives and 5.5 million children&rsquo;s lives could be saved each year if all women and children had access to a full package of essential health care.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Every year 8.8 million children die before reaching age 5.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Every year 343,000 women lose their lives due to pregnancy or childbirth complications.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;An additional 4.3 million health workers are needed in developing countries to help save lives and meet the health-related Millennium Development Goals.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The eleventh annual Mothers&rsquo; Index helps document conditions for mothers and children in 160 countries &ndash; 43 developed nations and 117 in the developing world &ndash; and shows where mothers fare best and where they face the greatest hardships.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;European countries &ndash; along with New Zealand and Australia &ndash; dominate the top positions while countries in sub-Saharan Africa dominate the lowest tier.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">According to [inside]Performance Audit-Report No. 8 of 2009-10[/inside], please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Performace%20Audit.pdf" title="Performance audit NRHM">click here</a> to access:</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;This is the latest and an extremely significant report on the status and performance of the National Rural Health Mission (NRHM) all over India providing clues for areas of concern and immediate action. Some of the salient features are as follows:</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The performance audit on implementation of the NRHM was conducted during April-December 2008 in the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, State Health Societies (SHS) of 33 States/UTs, District Health Societies (DHS) of 129 districts and 2369 health centres at block and village levels covering the period from 2005-06 to 2007-08.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The NRHM initiated decentralised bottom-up planning. This, however, had been hindered by non-completion of household and facility surveys and State specific perspective plans. In nine States, district level annual plans were not prepared during 2005-08 and in 24 States/UTs block and village level annual plans had not been prepared at all.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Village level health and sanitation committees were still to be constituted in nine States. The Rogi Kalyan Samitis (RKS) formed at many health centres, aiming at community ownership of healthcare delivery systems, were characterised by weak or absent grievance redressal mechanisms, outreach and awareness generation efforts.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;No RKS in any State/UT received all the stipulated central grants. In 13 States/UTs, the Samiti failed to generate internal resources, while in the remaining States no mechanism existed to monitor the generation of a third of the RKS funds from internal resources as prescribed.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The participation of Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs) in the Mission&rsquo;s activities had not been facilitated and their contribution towards capacity building and service delivery was not effectively monitored. 71 per cent of the districts countrywide were yet to be covered under the Mother NGO scheme.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;During the period 2005-06 to 2007-08, the total outlay/expenditure on the NRHM was Rs. 24,151.45 crore. During the first two years the Centre was contributing 100 per cent of the funds. Thereafter, the States were to contribute 15 per cent of funds during the 11th Five Year Plan (2007-12). However, many of the States were yet to contribute their share to the Mission and this issue needs to be addressed. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Many high focus States where diseases are endemic and health indicators poor, were however, receiving relatively lesser central grants, as high unspent balances of previous years remained, indicating that capacity building needs to be focused on.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Basic facilities (proper buildings, hygienic environment, electricity and water supply etc.) were still absent in many existing health centres with many Primary Health Centres (PHCs) and Community Health Centres (CHCs) being unable to provide guaranteed services such as inpatient services, operation theatres, labour rooms, pathological tests, X-ray facilities and emergency care etc.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;While contract workers have been engaged to fill vacancies, there are still shortages of specialist doctors at CHCs, adequate staff nurses at CHCs/PHCs and Auxiliary Nursing Midwife (ANMs)/ Multi-purpose Worker (MPWs) at Sub Centres.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;In nine States, the stock of essential drugs, contraceptives and vaccines adequate for two months consumption as required under norms were not available in any of the test checked PHCs and CHCs.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Despite holding two National Immunisation Days, six Special National Immunisation Days (and additional rounds in selected districts of Bihar and Uttar Pradesh), 1640 new polio cases had been detected in 17 States/UTs during 2005-08.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> <span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">According to [inside]&lsquo;Diarrhoea: Why children are still dying and what can be done?&rsquo; (2009)[/inside], please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Diarrhoea%20Why%20children%20are%20still%20dying%20and%20what%20can%20be%20done.pdf" title="Diarrhoea Why children are still dying and what can be done">click here</a> to access:</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Diarrhoea is defined as having loose or watery stools at least three times per day, or more frequently than normal for an individual. Though most episodes of childhood diarrhoea are mild, acute cases can lead to death and other complications. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The leading cause of diarrhea is lack of sanitation and safe drinking water and the life threatening disease is very easily curable with simple tablets and rehydration. (An estimated 88 per cent of diarrhoeal deaths worldwide are attributable to unsafe water, inadequate sanitation and poor hygiene.)</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Most pathogens that cause diarrhoea share a similar mode of transmission &ndash; from the stool of one person to the mouth of another.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;In India, under-five mortality rate (per 1000 live births) was 69 during 2008. The number of under-five deaths was 18,30,000 during 2008. The percentage of children under-five with diarrhoea receiving ORS packet during 2005-2008 was 26%.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Nearly, nine million children under five years of age die each year. Diarrhoea is second only to pneumonia as the cause of these deaths.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Reducing these deaths depends largely on delivering life-saving treatment of low-osmolarity oral rehydration salts (ORS) and zinc tablets to all children in need.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Examples of rehydrating fluids include cereal-based drinks made from a thin gruel of rice, maize, potato or other readily available low-cost grain or root crop the family has at home. Breastmilk is also an excellent drink for fluid replacement and should continue to be given to infants with diarrhoea simultaneously with other oral rehydration solutions.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;According to the latest available figures, an estimated 2.5 billion people lack improved sanitation facilities, and nearly one billion people do not have access to safe drinking water. These unsanitary environments allow diarrhoea-causing pathogens to spread more easily.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Globally, 1.2 billion people practise open defecation, 83 per cent of whom live in 13 countries</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Together, pneumonia and diarrhoea are responsible for an estimated 40 per cent of all child deaths around the world each year.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Nearly 1 in 4 people in developing countries were practising indiscriminate or open defecation in 2006.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Nearly one in five child deaths &ndash; about 1.5 million each year &ndash; is due to diarrhoea. It kills more young children than AIDS, malaria and measles combined.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Between 1990 and 2006, the proportion of the developing world&rsquo;s population using an improved drinking water source rose from 71 per cent to 84 per cent. Still, almost 1 billion people lack access to improved drinking water sources, and many households do not treat or safely store their household water supplies.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The prevention package highlights five main elements that require a concerted approach in their implementation. The package includes: a) rotavirus and measles vaccinations, b) promotion of early and exclusive breastfeeding and vitamin A supplementation, c) promotion of handwashing with soap, d) improved water supply quantity and quality, including treatment and safe storage of household water, and e) community-wide sanitation promotion.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Mortality from diarrhoea has declined over the past two decades from an estimated 5 million deaths among children under five to 1.5 million deaths in 2004 </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Africa and South Asia are home to more than 80 per cent of child deaths due to diarrhoea</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Improving sanitation facilities has been associated with an estimated median reduction in diarrhoea incidence of 36 per cent across reviewed studies.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Interventions to improve water quality at the source, along with treatment of household water and safe storage systems, have been shown to reduce diarrhoea incidence by as much as 47 per cent.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Diarrhoea often leads to stunting in children due to its association with poor nutrient absorption and appetite loss.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Breastmilk contains the nutrients, antioxidants, hormones and antibodies needed by a child to survive and develop.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Undernourished children are more likely to suffer from diarrhoea and its consequences, which, in turn, increases their chances of worsening nutritional status. Today, 129 million children under the age of five in the developing world are underweight for their age. Together, Africa and South Asia account for more than 80 per cent of total underweight children (25 per cent and 57 per cent, respectively). About 40 per cent of children under five years of age are stunted in Africa, and nearly half in South Asia.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Only 37 per cent of infants in developing countries are exclusively breastfed for the first six months of life.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Boys and girls are equally likely to receive ORS to treat diarrhoea. Children in urban areas (39 percent) are more likely to receive ORS than those living in rural areas (31 per cent). Similarly, children from the wealthiest families are 1.5 times as likely to receive ORS to treat their diarrhoea as the poorest children</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">**page**<em>&nbsp;</em></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">According to the [inside]World Health Statistics 2009[/inside], please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/World%20Health%20Statistics%202009.pdf" title="World Health Statistics 2009">click here</a> to access:</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp; </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The proportion of under-nourished children under five years of age declined from 27% in 1990 to 20% in 2005. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Some 27% fewer children died before their fifth birthday in 2007 than in 1990. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Maternal mortality has barely changed since 1990. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;One third of 9.7 million people in developing countries who need treatment for HIV/AIDS were receiving it in 2007. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;MDG target for reducing the incidence of tuberculosis was met globally in 2004. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;27 countries reported a reduction of up to 50% in the number of malaria cases between 1990 and 2006. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The number of people with access to safe drinking-water rose from 4.1 billion in 1990 to 5.7 billion in 2006. About 1.1 billion people in developing regions gained access to improved sanitation in the same period. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Globally, the proportion of children under five years of age suffering from under-nutrition, according to WHO Child Growth Standards, declined from 27% in 1990 to 20% in 2005. But, the progress is uneven, and an estimated 112 million children are underweight. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Globally, the number of children who die before their fifth birthday has been reduced by 27% from 12.5 million estimated in 1990 to 9 million in 2007. This reduction is due to a combination of interventions, including the use of insecticide-treated mosquito nets for malaria, oral rehydration therapy for diarrhoea, increased access to vaccines for a number of infectious diseases and improved water and sanitation. But pneumonia and diarrhoea continue to kill 3.8 million children aged under five each year, although both conditions are preventable and treatable.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The global maternal mortality ratio of 400 maternal deaths per 100 000 live births in 2005 has barely changed since 1990. Every year an estimated 536 000 women die in pregnancy or childbirth. Most of these deaths occur in sub-Saharan Africa where the maternal mortality ratio is 900 per 100 000 births and where there has been no measurable improvement since 1990. A woman in Africa may face a 1-in-26 lifetime risk of death during pregnancy and childbirth, compared with only 1 in 7300 in the developed regions. 1 There are, however, signs of progress in some countries in Asia and Latin America and the Caribbean.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The percentage of adults living with HIV worldwide has remained stable since 2000 but there were an estimated 2.7 million new infections during 2007. Moreover, deaths are increasing in parts of Africa, particularly eastern and southern Africa. The use of antiretroviral therapy has increased; in 2007, about 1 million more people living with HIV received the treatment. That means one third of the estimated 9.7 million people in developing countries who need the treatment were receiving it. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The MDG target for reducing the incidence of tuberculosis was met globally in 2004. Since then, incidence has continued to fall slowly. Thanks to early detection of new cases and effective treatment using the WHO-recommended DOTS treatment strategy, treatment success rates have been consistently improving, with rates rising from 79% in 1990 to 85% in 2006. Multi-drug resistant tuberculosis is a challenge in countries, such as those of the former Soviet Union, while the lethal combination of HIV and tuberculosis is an issue particularly for sub-Saharan African countries. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Efforts to control malaria are beginning to pay off with significant increases in the proportion of children sleeping under insecticide-treated mosquito nets. Although it is still too early to register the global impact, 27 countries &ndash; including five in Africa &ndash; have reported a reduction of up to 50% in malaria cases between 1990 and 2006. In 2006, the number of cases was estimated to be 250 million globally. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Progress has been made in treating neglected tropical diseases that affect some 1.2 billion people. For example, only 9585 cases of dracunculiasis (guinea-worm disease) were reported in the five countries where the disease is endemic, compared with an estimated 3.5 million reported in 20 such countries in 1985. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The number of people with access to safe drinking water rose from an estimated 4.1 billion in 1990 to 5.7 billion in 2006. But 900 million people still had to rely on water from what are known as unimproved sources, for example surface water or an unprotected dug well.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Since 1990, an estimated 1.1 billion people in developing regions have gained access to improved sanitation. In 1990, just under 3 billion people had access to sanitation. Their number rose to more than 4 billion by 2006. Yet, in 2006 some 2.5 billion did not have access to improved sanitation and 1.2 billion had to practise open defecation. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Although nearly all developing countries publish an essential medicines list, the availability of medicines at public health facilities is often poor. Surveys in about 30 developing countries show that availability of selected medicines at health facilities was only 35% in the public sector and 63% in the private sector. Lack of medicines in the public sector often means patients have no choice but to purchase them privately or do without treatment. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">According to [inside]National Family Health Survey-III (2005-06)[/inside], </span><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">please <a href="http://rchiips.org/NFHS/nfhs3.shtml" title="http://rchiips.org/NFHS/nfhs3.shtml">click here</a> to access:<br /> <br /> <u><strong>NFHS III reports declining status of nutrition amidst women</strong></u></span><br /> &nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">The NFHS III paints a mixed picture of India&rsquo;s overall reproductive health status. Women are having fewer children and infant mortality has dropped in the seven-year period since the last NFHS survey in 1998-99. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Anaemia and malnutrition are still widespread among children and adults. And, in an unusual juxtaposition, more adults, especially urban women, are overweight or obese than they were seven years ago. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> <span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:medium"><u><strong>Trend in Family Planning and Fertility</strong></u> </span></span><br /> &nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Fertility has continued to decline since NFHS-2, dropping to an average of 2.7 children from 2.9 children. Ten states, mostly in Southern India, have reached replacement level or below replacement level fertility. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">While son preference remains a barrier to more rapid decline in fertility, an increasing number of women who have only daughters say that they want no more children. In NFHS-3, 62% of women with two daughters and no sons say they want no more children, compared with 47% in NFHS-2. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Declining fertility could be attributed largely to women&rsquo;s increased use of contraception. For the first time ever, more than half of currently married women in India are using contraception, and their use of modern contraceptive methods increased from 43% to 49% between NFHS-2 and NFHS-3. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">A rise in the average age at marriage is also contributing to the drop in fertility. Forty-five percent of women ages 20-24 were married before the legal age of marriage of 18 years, compared with 50% seven years earlier. This shift in age at marriage also influences the median age at first birth, which increased by six months to 19.8 years. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> <span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:medium"><u><strong>Half of Women Lack Proper Care during Pregnancy and Delivery</strong></u></span></span><br /> &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;More than three-quarters of pregnant women in India received at least some antenatal care (ANC), but only half of women had at least three ANC visits with a health provider during their pregnancy. </span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull;&nbsp;The disparity between urban and rural women was especially pronounced, with 74% of urban women having ANC at least three times, compared with 43% of rural women. Births assisted by a health professional increased to 49% from 42%, with 75% of urban women but only 39% of rural women in NFHS-3 received assistance from a health professional.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull;&nbsp;Institutional births increased from 34% to 41%, but most women still deliver their children at home. Only about one-third of women received postnatal care within two days of delivery.<br /> <br /> <span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><u><strong>Infant Mortality Drops, but Full Immunization Coverage Shows Little Progress</strong></u></span></span></span></p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Infant mortality continues to decline, dropping from 68 in 1998-99 to 57 in 2005-06 per thousand births. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">There were particularly notable drops in the infant mortality rate in Bihar, Goa, Haryana, Jammu and Kashmir, Meghalaya, Orissa, Punjab, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, and Uttar Pradesh. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Overall, there was only a marginal improvement in full vaccination coverage, with 44% of children ages 12-23 months receiving all recommended vaccinations, up from 42% seven years earlier. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Substantial improvements in coverage have been made in all vaccinations except DPT, which did not change at all between NFHS-2 and NFHS-3. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Gains are particularly evident for polio vaccination coverage, but nearly one-quarter of children age 12-23 months did not receive three recommended doses. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Progress in vaccination coverage varies markedly among the states. In 11 states, there has been a substantial deterioration in full immunization coverage in the last seven years, due to a decline in vaccination coverage for both DPT and polio. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Large decline were seen in Maharashtra, Mizoram, Andhra Pradesh, and Punjab. On the other hand, there was major improvement in full immunization coverage in Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Sikkim, and West Bengal. Other states with marked improvements in full immunization coverage were Assam, Haryana, Jammu and Kashmir, Madhya Pradesh, Meghalaya, and Uttaranchal. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Diarrhoea continues to be a major health problem for many children.&nbsp; Although knowledge about Oral Rehydration Salts (ORS) for the treatment of diarrhoea is widespread among mothers, only 58% of children with diarrhoea were taken to a health facility, down from 65% seven years earlier. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">There has been a rise in the number of dispensaries and hospitals, nursing personnel and doctors (including primary health care centers) in between 1991 and 2005/06, as could be deciphered from the table below.</span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:medium"><u><strong>Trends in health care infrastructure</strong></u> </span></span></p> <div> <table align="justify" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" style="height:96px; width:417px"> <caption> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> </caption> <tbody> <tr> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp;</span></td> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:medium"><strong>1991 </strong></span></span></td> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:medium">&nbsp;<strong>2005/2006</strong></span></span></td> </tr> <tr> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp;SC/PHC/CHC (March 2006)</span></td> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp;57353</span></td> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp;171567</span></td> </tr> <tr> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp;Dispensaries and Hospitals (all) (1.4.2006)</span></td> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp;23555</span></td> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp;32156</span></td> </tr> <tr> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp;Nursing Personnel (2005)</span></td> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp;143887</span></td> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp;1481270</span></td> </tr> <tr> </tr> </tbody> </table> </div> ', 'credit_writer' => '', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 10, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'public-health-51', 'meta_title' => '', 'meta_keywords' => '', 'meta_description' => '', 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 51, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [[maximum depth reached]], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 21, 'metaTitle' => 'Hunger / HDI | Public Health', 'metaKeywords' => '', 'metaDesc' => 'KEY TRENDS&nbsp; &nbsp; &bull; The 2019&nbsp;India&nbsp;TB&nbsp;report&nbsp;says&nbsp;that the&nbsp;country&nbsp;accounted for a quarter of the global tuberculosis (TB) burden with an estimated 27 lakh cases in 2018. In 2018, the country was able to achieve a total notification of 21.5 lakh TB cases, of which...', 'disp' => '<p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">KEY TRENDS&nbsp;</span></p><p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p><div style="text-align:justify">&bull; The 2019&nbsp;India&nbsp;TB&nbsp;report&nbsp;says&nbsp;that the&nbsp;country&nbsp;accounted for a quarter of the global tuberculosis (TB) burden with an estimated 27 lakh cases in 2018. In 2018, the country was able to achieve a total notification of 21.5 lakh TB cases, of which 25 percent was from private sector. Majority of the TB burden is among the working age group. Nearly 89 percent of TB cases came from the age group 15-69 years. About 2/3rd of the TB patients were males <strong>*15</strong></div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify">&bull; Maternal Mortality Ratio for India was 370 in 2000, 286 in 2005, 210 in&nbsp; 2010, 158 in 2015 and 145 in 2017. Therefore, the MMRatio for the country reduced by almost 61 percent between 2000 and 2017. MMRatio for China was 59 in 2000, 44 in 2005, 36 in 2010, 30 in 2015 and 29 in 2017. Therefore, the MMRatio for China fell by around 51 percent between 2000 and 2017 <strong>*14</strong> &nbsp;<br />&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify">&bull; The per capita public expenditure (actual) on health in nominal terms has gone up from Rs. 621 in 2009-10 to Rs. 1,112 in 2015-16. Public expenditure on health (includes health sector expenditure by Centre and States/UTs) as a percentage of GDP was 1.02 percent in 2015-16. There is no significant change in public expenditure on health as a percentage of GDP since 2009-10. The Centre-State share in total public expenditure on health was 31:69 in 2015-16, which used to be 36:64 in 2009-10 <strong>*13</strong><br /><br />&bull; The North-Eastern states had the highest (viz. Rs. 2,878 per capita) and Empowered Action Group (EAG) states (including Assam) had the lowest (viz. Rs. 871 per capita) average per capita public expenditure on health in 2015-16 (excluding UTs). The North-Eastern states had the highest public health expenditure as a percentage of Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP) in 2015-16 (2.76 percent). Public health expenditure as a percentage of GSDP stood at 1.36 percent for EAG states (including Assam) and 0.76 percent for major non-EAG states <strong>*13</strong></div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify">&bull; Of the total disease burden in India in 1990, a tenth was caused by a group of risks including unhealthy diet, high blood pressure, high blood sugar, high cholesterol, and overweight, which mainly contribute to ischaemic heart disease, stroke, and diabetes. The contribution of this group of risks increased massively to a quarter of the total disease burden in India in 2016 <strong>*12</strong><br /><br />&bull; The Out-of-Pocket Expenditure (OOPE) on health by households is Rs. 3,02,425 crores (62.6 percent of total health expenditure, 2.4 percent of GDP, Rs. 2,394 per capita) for the year 2014-15. Private Health Insurance expenditure is Rs. 17,755 crores (3.7 percent of total health expenditure) for the year 2014-15 <strong>*11</strong><br /><br />&bull; Based on available evidence, cardiovascular disease (24 percent), chronic respiratory disease (11 percent), cancer (6 percent) and diabetes (2 percent) are the leading cause of mortality in India <strong>*10</strong><br />&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify">&bull; The total number of dengue cases in India has grown from 28,292 in 2010 to 40,425 in 2014. The total number of dengue related deaths stood at 131 in 2014 <strong>*10</strong></div><div style="text-align:justify"><br />&bull; The Proportion (per 1000) of Ailing Persons (PAP), measured as the number of living persons reporting ailments (per 1000 persons), was 89 persons in rural India and 118 persons in urban India <strong>*9</strong><br />&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify">&bull; Private doctors were the most important single source of non-hospitalized treatment in both the sectors (Rural &amp; Urban). More than 70% (72 per cent in the rural areas and 79 per cent in the urban areas) spells of ailment were treated in the private sector (consisting of private doctors, nursing homes, private hospitals, charitable institutions, etc.) <strong>*9</strong></div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify">&bull; It is observed that in rural India, 42 percent hospitalised treatment was carried out in public hospital and rest 58 percent in private hospital. For the urban India, the corresponding figures were 32 percent and 68 percent. It may be noted in this context that households (or persons within households) were segregated in sector (rural/urban) by their place of domicile, and not by the place of treatment <strong>*9</strong></div><p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p><div style="text-align:justify">&bull; Average medical expenditure per hospitalisation case: Higher amount was spent for treatment per hospitalised case by people in the private hospitals (Rs. 25850) than in the public hospitals (Rs. 6120). The highest expenditure was recorded for treatment of Cancer (Rs. 56712) followed by that for Cardio-vascular diseases (Rs. 31647). Average medical expenditure per non-hospitalisation case was Rs. 509 in rural India and Rs. 639 in urban India <strong>*9</strong><br /><br />&bull; As much as 86 percent of rural population and 82 percent of urban population were still not covered under any scheme of health expenditure support. Government, however, was able to bring about 12 percent urban and 13 percent rural population under health protection coverage through Rastriya Swasthya Bima Yojana (RSBY) or similar plan. Only 12 percent households of the 5th quintile class (Usual Monthly Per Capita Consumer Expenditure) of urban area had some arrangement of medical insurance from private provider <strong>*9</strong></div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify">&bull; The draft National Health Policy 2015 proposes a potentially achievable target of raising public health expenditure to 2.5% of the GDP. It also notes that 40% of this would need to come from Central expenditures. At current prices, a target of 2.5% of GDP translates to Rs. 3800 per capita, representing an almost four fold increase in five years <strong>*8</strong><br />&nbsp;<br />&bull; Maternal mortality ratio (MMR)* in India stood at 560 maternal deaths (per 100000 live births) during 1990, 460 during 1995, 370 during 2000, 280 during 2005 and 190 during 2013. India could reduce MMR by 65 percent between 1990 and 2013<strong> *7</strong><br /><br />&bull; At the country level, the two countries that accounted for one third of all global maternal deaths are India at 17 percent (50000) and Nigeria at 14 percent (40000)<strong> *7</strong><br /><br />&bull; U5MR in India declined by 55 percent from 126 in 1990 to 56 in 2012. Infant Mortality Rate declined from 88 in 1990 to 44 in 2012. Neonatal mortality rate declined from 51 in 1990 to 31 in 2012. U5MR in India among boys declined from 121 in 1990 to 54 in 2012. U5MR in India among girls declined from 130 in 1990 to 59 in 2012. The share of neonatal deaths in under-five deaths stood at 55 percent in 2012 as compared to 41 percent in 1990 <strong>*6</strong><br /><br />&bull; Pneumonia is the leading cause of child mortality in India, responsible for the deaths of nearly 400,000 children under five in 2010 <strong>*5</strong><br /><br />&bull; The Indian Commission on Macroeconomics and Health notes that, in India, 13 household person-days per patient were lost per episode of malaria. Furthermore, the commission estimated that the overall monetary losses to families (income losses together with treatment expenses) could amount to between 200 and 400 Indian rupees (US$ 3.5 to 7) <strong>*4</strong><br /><br />&bull; Odisha is one of the most highly malaria-endemic states in India, accounting for 24% of reported cases in 2010 despite consisting of less of than 4% of the national population. Malaria is particularly common among tribal groups which represent 44% of the population of Orissa <strong>*4</strong><br /><br />&bull; Globally 12% of all deaths among adults aged 30 years and over were attributed to tobacco as compared with 16% in India, 17% in Pakistan and 31% in Bangladesh <strong>*3</strong><br /><br />&bull; A recent study illustrated the economic impact of Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs) in India by estimating that if NCDs like: heart disease, cancer, diabetes, chronic respiratory conditions, and other NCDs were &ldquo;eliminated&rdquo;, the country&rsquo;s 2004 GDP would have been 4 to 10 percent greater<strong> *2</strong><br /><br />&bull; The share of out-of-pocket household health expenditures on NCDs in India increased from 32 percent to 47 percent between 1995&ndash;1996 and 2004. Moreover, 40 percent of these expenditures were financed by borrowing and sales of assets, increasing the household&rsquo;s financial vulnerability<strong> *2</strong><br /><br />&bull; In NFHS-III, 62% of women with two daughters and no sons say they want no more children, compared with 47% in NFHS-II<strong> *1</strong></div><div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>15.</strong> 2019 India TB report, released in 2019, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, please <a href="https://tbcindia.gov.in/WriteReadData/India%20TB%20Report%202019.pdf" title="https://tbcindia.gov.in/WriteReadData/India%20TB%20Report%202019.pdf">click here</a> and <a href="https://tbcindia.gov.in/index1.php?lang=1&amp;level=1&amp;sublinkid=4160&amp;lid=2807" title="https://tbcindia.gov.in/index1.php?lang=1&amp;level=1&amp;sublinkid=4160&amp;lid=2807">click here</a> to access</div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>14.</strong> Trends in Maternal Mortality 2000 to 2017: Estimates by World Health Orgnization (WHO), United Nations Children&#39;s Fund (UNICEF), World Bank Group, United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) and the United Nations Population Division (released in September 2019), please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Maternal%20mortality%20Levels%20and%20trends%202000%20to%202017%20Executive%20Summary.pdf" title="Maternal mortality Levels and trends 2000 to 2017 Executive Summary" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Maternal%20mortality%20Levels%20and%20trends%202000%20to%202017%20Executive%20Summary.pdf" title="Maternal mortality Levels and trends 2000 to 2017 Executive Summary">click here</a> and <a href="https://www.unfpa.org/featured-publication/trends-maternal-mortality-2000-2017" title="https://www.unfpa.org/featured-publication/trends-maternal-mortality-2000-2017">click here</a> to access</div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>13</strong>. National Health Profile 2018, 13th Issue, Central Bureau of Health Intelligence, Ministry of Health &amp; Family Welfare, please <a href="https://im4change.org/docs/900National%20Health%20Profile%202018%2013th%20Issue%20Central%20Bureau%20of%20Health%20Intelligence%20Ministry%20of%20Health%20&amp;%20Family%20Welfare.pdf" title="https://im4change.org/docs/900National%20Health%20Profile%202018%2013th%20Issue%20Central%20Bureau%20of%20Health%20Intelligence%20Ministry%20of%20Health%20&amp;%20Family%20Welfare.pdf">click here</a> to access&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>12. </strong>India: Health of the Nation&rsquo;s States - The India State-Level Disease Burden Initiative, Disease Burden Trends in the States of India 1990 to 2016 (released in October, 2017), prepared by Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), Public Health Foundation of India (PHFI), Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) and Ministry of Health &amp; Family Welfare (MoHFW), please <a href="https://im4change.org/docs/11592India_Health_of.pdf" title="https://im4change.org/docs/11592India_Health_of.pdf">click here</a> to access</div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>11</strong>. National Health Accounts: Estimates for India 2014-15 (released in October, 2017), prepared by the National Health Accounts Technical Secretariat, National Health Systems Resource Centre and Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/National%20Health%20Accounts%20Estimates%20Report%202014-15.pdf" title="National Health Accounts Estimates for India 2014-15" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/National%20Health%20Accounts%20Estimates%20Report%202014-15.pdf" title="National Health Accounts Estimates for India 2014-15">click here</a> to access</div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>10</strong>. National Health Profile 2015, Central Bureau of Health Intelligence, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (please <a href="http://www.cbhidghs.nic.in/E-Book%20HTML-2015/index.html" title="http://www.cbhidghs.nic.in/E-Book%20HTML-2015/index.html">click here</a> to access)</div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>9</strong>. 71st round NSS report: Key Indicators of Social Consumption in India-Health (published in June 2015), please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/nss_71st_ki_health_30june15.pdf" title="NSS 71st Round Health" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/nss_71st_ki_health_30june15.pdf" title="NSS 71st Round Health">click here</a> to access the full report; please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/NSS%20Press%20Release%20Health.pdf" title="NSS Press Note Health" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/NSS%20Press%20Release%20Health.pdf" title="NSS Press Note Health">click here</a> to read the summary of findings</div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>8</strong>. Draft National Health Policy 2015 (published in December 2014), Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (Please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Draft%20National%20Health%20Policy%202015.pdf" title="Draft NHP 2015" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Draft%20National%20Health%20Policy%202015.pdf" title="Draft NHP 2015">click here</a> to download)</div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>7</strong>. United Nations&#39; report (released in May, 2014) entitled Trends in maternal mortality estimates 1990 to 2013,&nbsp;</span>(please&nbsp;<a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Trends%20in%20Maternal%20Mortality%201990%20to%202013.pdf" title="Trends in Maternal Mortality 1990 to 2013" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Trends%20in%20Maternal%20Mortality%201990%20to%202013.pdf" title="Trends in Maternal Mortality 1990 to 2013">click here</a>&nbsp;to download)</div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><strong>6. </strong><a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/APR_Progress_Report_2013_9_Sept_2013_1.pdf" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/APR_Progress_Report_2013_9_Sept_2013_1.pdf">Committing to Child Survival</a>: A Promise Renewed Progress Report 2013, UNICEF </span></span></p></div><p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>5</strong>. Pneumonia Progress Report, 2012, released by IVAC and John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012.pdf" title="Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012.pdf" title="Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012">click here</a> to access</span></p><p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p><div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>4</strong>. Defeating malaria in Asia, the Pacific, Americas, Middle East and Europe (2012), World Health Organization and PATH,&nbsp;</span></div><p style="text-align:justify"><a href="http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Defeating%20malaria.pdf" title="http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Defeating%20malaria.pdf">http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Defeat<br />ing%20malaria.pdf</a></p><p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>3</strong>. WHO Global Report: Mortality Attributable to Tobacco (2012), please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/WHO%20report%20on%20Tobacco.pdf" title="WHO " title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/WHO%20report%20on%20Tobacco.pdf" title="WHO ">click here</a> to access&nbsp;&nbsp;</span></p><p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>2</strong>. The Growing Danger of Non-Communicable Diseases: Acting Now to Reverse Course, September, 2011, The World Bank, please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/WBDeepeningCrisis.pdf" title="WBDeepeningCrisis" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/WBDeepeningCrisis.pdf" title="WBDeepeningCrisis">click here</a> to access</span></p><p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>1</strong>. National Family Health Survey III (2005-06), please <a href="http://rchiips.org/NFHS/nfhs3.shtml" title="http://rchiips.org/NFHS/nfhs3.shtml">click here</a> to access &nbsp;</span></p><p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:justify">', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 21, 'title' => 'Public Health', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">KEY TRENDS&nbsp;</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <div style="text-align:justify">&bull; The 2019&nbsp;India&nbsp;TB&nbsp;report&nbsp;says&nbsp;that the&nbsp;country&nbsp;accounted for a quarter of the global tuberculosis (TB) burden with an estimated 27 lakh cases in 2018. In 2018, the country was able to achieve a total notification of 21.5 lakh TB cases, of which 25 percent was from private sector. Majority of the TB burden is among the working age group. Nearly 89 percent of TB cases came from the age group 15-69 years. About 2/3rd of the TB patients were males <strong>*15</strong></div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&bull; Maternal Mortality Ratio for India was 370 in 2000, 286 in 2005, 210 in&nbsp; 2010, 158 in 2015 and 145 in 2017. Therefore, the MMRatio for the country reduced by almost 61 percent between 2000 and 2017. MMRatio for China was 59 in 2000, 44 in 2005, 36 in 2010, 30 in 2015 and 29 in 2017. Therefore, the MMRatio for China fell by around 51 percent between 2000 and 2017 <strong>*14</strong> &nbsp;<br /> &nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&bull; The per capita public expenditure (actual) on health in nominal terms has gone up from Rs. 621 in 2009-10 to Rs. 1,112 in 2015-16. Public expenditure on health (includes health sector expenditure by Centre and States/UTs) as a percentage of GDP was 1.02 percent in 2015-16. There is no significant change in public expenditure on health as a percentage of GDP since 2009-10. The Centre-State share in total public expenditure on health was 31:69 in 2015-16, which used to be 36:64 in 2009-10 <strong>*13</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; The North-Eastern states had the highest (viz. Rs. 2,878 per capita) and Empowered Action Group (EAG) states (including Assam) had the lowest (viz. Rs. 871 per capita) average per capita public expenditure on health in 2015-16 (excluding UTs). The North-Eastern states had the highest public health expenditure as a percentage of Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP) in 2015-16 (2.76 percent). Public health expenditure as a percentage of GSDP stood at 1.36 percent for EAG states (including Assam) and 0.76 percent for major non-EAG states <strong>*13</strong></div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&bull; Of the total disease burden in India in 1990, a tenth was caused by a group of risks including unhealthy diet, high blood pressure, high blood sugar, high cholesterol, and overweight, which mainly contribute to ischaemic heart disease, stroke, and diabetes. The contribution of this group of risks increased massively to a quarter of the total disease burden in India in 2016 <strong>*12</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; The Out-of-Pocket Expenditure (OOPE) on health by households is Rs. 3,02,425 crores (62.6 percent of total health expenditure, 2.4 percent of GDP, Rs. 2,394 per capita) for the year 2014-15. Private Health Insurance expenditure is Rs. 17,755 crores (3.7 percent of total health expenditure) for the year 2014-15 <strong>*11</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; Based on available evidence, cardiovascular disease (24 percent), chronic respiratory disease (11 percent), cancer (6 percent) and diabetes (2 percent) are the leading cause of mortality in India <strong>*10</strong><br /> &nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&bull; The total number of dengue cases in India has grown from 28,292 in 2010 to 40,425 in 2014. The total number of dengue related deaths stood at 131 in 2014 <strong>*10</strong></div> <div style="text-align:justify"><br /> &bull; The Proportion (per 1000) of Ailing Persons (PAP), measured as the number of living persons reporting ailments (per 1000 persons), was 89 persons in rural India and 118 persons in urban India <strong>*9</strong><br /> &nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&bull; Private doctors were the most important single source of non-hospitalized treatment in both the sectors (Rural &amp; Urban). More than 70% (72 per cent in the rural areas and 79 per cent in the urban areas) spells of ailment were treated in the private sector (consisting of private doctors, nursing homes, private hospitals, charitable institutions, etc.) <strong>*9</strong></div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&bull; It is observed that in rural India, 42 percent hospitalised treatment was carried out in public hospital and rest 58 percent in private hospital. For the urban India, the corresponding figures were 32 percent and 68 percent. It may be noted in this context that households (or persons within households) were segregated in sector (rural/urban) by their place of domicile, and not by the place of treatment <strong>*9</strong></div> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <div style="text-align:justify">&bull; Average medical expenditure per hospitalisation case: Higher amount was spent for treatment per hospitalised case by people in the private hospitals (Rs. 25850) than in the public hospitals (Rs. 6120). The highest expenditure was recorded for treatment of Cancer (Rs. 56712) followed by that for Cardio-vascular diseases (Rs. 31647). Average medical expenditure per non-hospitalisation case was Rs. 509 in rural India and Rs. 639 in urban India <strong>*9</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; As much as 86 percent of rural population and 82 percent of urban population were still not covered under any scheme of health expenditure support. Government, however, was able to bring about 12 percent urban and 13 percent rural population under health protection coverage through Rastriya Swasthya Bima Yojana (RSBY) or similar plan. Only 12 percent households of the 5th quintile class (Usual Monthly Per Capita Consumer Expenditure) of urban area had some arrangement of medical insurance from private provider <strong>*9</strong></div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&bull; The draft National Health Policy 2015 proposes a potentially achievable target of raising public health expenditure to 2.5% of the GDP. It also notes that 40% of this would need to come from Central expenditures. At current prices, a target of 2.5% of GDP translates to Rs. 3800 per capita, representing an almost four fold increase in five years <strong>*8</strong><br /> &nbsp;<br /> &bull; Maternal mortality ratio (MMR)* in India stood at 560 maternal deaths (per 100000 live births) during 1990, 460 during 1995, 370 during 2000, 280 during 2005 and 190 during 2013. India could reduce MMR by 65 percent between 1990 and 2013<strong> *7</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; At the country level, the two countries that accounted for one third of all global maternal deaths are India at 17 percent (50000) and Nigeria at 14 percent (40000)<strong> *7</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; U5MR in India declined by 55 percent from 126 in 1990 to 56 in 2012. Infant Mortality Rate declined from 88 in 1990 to 44 in 2012. Neonatal mortality rate declined from 51 in 1990 to 31 in 2012. U5MR in India among boys declined from 121 in 1990 to 54 in 2012. U5MR in India among girls declined from 130 in 1990 to 59 in 2012. The share of neonatal deaths in under-five deaths stood at 55 percent in 2012 as compared to 41 percent in 1990 <strong>*6</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; Pneumonia is the leading cause of child mortality in India, responsible for the deaths of nearly 400,000 children under five in 2010 <strong>*5</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; The Indian Commission on Macroeconomics and Health notes that, in India, 13 household person-days per patient were lost per episode of malaria. Furthermore, the commission estimated that the overall monetary losses to families (income losses together with treatment expenses) could amount to between 200 and 400 Indian rupees (US$ 3.5 to 7) <strong>*4</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; Odisha is one of the most highly malaria-endemic states in India, accounting for 24% of reported cases in 2010 despite consisting of less of than 4% of the national population. Malaria is particularly common among tribal groups which represent 44% of the population of Orissa <strong>*4</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; Globally 12% of all deaths among adults aged 30 years and over were attributed to tobacco as compared with 16% in India, 17% in Pakistan and 31% in Bangladesh <strong>*3</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; A recent study illustrated the economic impact of Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs) in India by estimating that if NCDs like: heart disease, cancer, diabetes, chronic respiratory conditions, and other NCDs were &ldquo;eliminated&rdquo;, the country&rsquo;s 2004 GDP would have been 4 to 10 percent greater<strong> *2</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; The share of out-of-pocket household health expenditures on NCDs in India increased from 32 percent to 47 percent between 1995&ndash;1996 and 2004. Moreover, 40 percent of these expenditures were financed by borrowing and sales of assets, increasing the household&rsquo;s financial vulnerability<strong> *2</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; In NFHS-III, 62% of women with two daughters and no sons say they want no more children, compared with 47% in NFHS-II<strong> *1</strong></div> <div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify"><strong>15.</strong> 2019 India TB report, released in 2019, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, please <a href="https://tbcindia.gov.in/WriteReadData/India%20TB%20Report%202019.pdf">click here</a> and <a href="https://tbcindia.gov.in/index1.php?lang=1&amp;level=1&amp;sublinkid=4160&amp;lid=2807">click here</a> to access</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify"><strong>14.</strong> Trends in Maternal Mortality 2000 to 2017: Estimates by World Health Orgnization (WHO), United Nations Children&#39;s Fund (UNICEF), World Bank Group, United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) and the United Nations Population Division (released in September 2019), please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Maternal%20mortality%20Levels%20and%20trends%202000%20to%202017%20Executive%20Summary.pdf" title="Maternal mortality Levels and trends 2000 to 2017 Executive Summary">click here</a> and <a href="https://www.unfpa.org/featured-publication/trends-maternal-mortality-2000-2017">click here</a> to access</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify"><strong>13</strong>. National Health Profile 2018, 13th Issue, Central Bureau of Health Intelligence, Ministry of Health &amp; Family Welfare, please <a href="https://im4change.org/docs/900National%20Health%20Profile%202018%2013th%20Issue%20Central%20Bureau%20of%20Health%20Intelligence%20Ministry%20of%20Health%20&amp;%20Family%20Welfare.pdf">click here</a> to access&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify"><strong>12. </strong>India: Health of the Nation&rsquo;s States - The India State-Level Disease Burden Initiative, Disease Burden Trends in the States of India 1990 to 2016 (released in October, 2017), prepared by Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), Public Health Foundation of India (PHFI), Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) and Ministry of Health &amp; Family Welfare (MoHFW), please <a href="https://im4change.org/docs/11592India_Health_of.pdf">click here</a> to access</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify"><strong>11</strong>. National Health Accounts: Estimates for India 2014-15 (released in October, 2017), prepared by the National Health Accounts Technical Secretariat, National Health Systems Resource Centre and Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/National%20Health%20Accounts%20Estimates%20Report%202014-15.pdf" title="National Health Accounts Estimates for India 2014-15">click here</a> to access</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify"><strong>10</strong>. National Health Profile 2015, Central Bureau of Health Intelligence, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (please <a href="http://www.cbhidghs.nic.in/E-Book%20HTML-2015/index.html">click here</a> to access)</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify"><strong>9</strong>. 71st round NSS report: Key Indicators of Social Consumption in India-Health (published in June 2015), please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/nss_71st_ki_health_30june15.pdf" title="NSS 71st Round Health">click here</a> to access the full report; please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/NSS%20Press%20Release%20Health.pdf" title="NSS Press Note Health">click here</a> to read the summary of findings</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify"><strong>8</strong>. Draft National Health Policy 2015 (published in December 2014), Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (Please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Draft%20National%20Health%20Policy%202015.pdf" title="Draft NHP 2015">click here</a> to download)</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>7</strong>. United Nations&#39; report (released in May, 2014) entitled Trends in maternal mortality estimates 1990 to 2013,&nbsp;</span>(please&nbsp;<a href="tinymce/uploaded/Trends%20in%20Maternal%20Mortality%201990%20to%202013.pdf" title="Trends in Maternal Mortality 1990 to 2013">click here</a>&nbsp;to download)</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><strong>6. </strong><a href="tinymce/uploaded/APR_Progress_Report_2013_9_Sept_2013_1.pdf">Committing to Child Survival</a>: A Promise Renewed Progress Report 2013, UNICEF </span></span></p> </div> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>5</strong>. Pneumonia Progress Report, 2012, released by IVAC and John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012.pdf" title="Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012">click here</a> to access</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>4</strong>. Defeating malaria in Asia, the Pacific, Americas, Middle East and Europe (2012), World Health Organization and PATH,&nbsp;</span></div> <p style="text-align:justify"><a href="http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Defeating%20malaria.pdf">http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Defeating%20malaria.pdf</a></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>3</strong>. WHO Global Report: Mortality Attributable to Tobacco (2012), please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/WHO%20report%20on%20Tobacco.pdf" title="WHO ">click here</a> to access&nbsp;&nbsp;</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>2</strong>. The Growing Danger of Non-Communicable Diseases: Acting Now to Reverse Course, September, 2011, The World Bank, please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/WBDeepeningCrisis.pdf" title="WBDeepeningCrisis">click here</a> to access</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>1</strong>. National Family Health Survey III (2005-06), please <a href="http://rchiips.org/NFHS/nfhs3.shtml">click here</a> to access &nbsp;</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The key findings of the [inside]Global Tuberculosis Report 2022 (released in October 2022)[/inside] by World Health Organization are as follows (please click <a href="/upload/files/Global%20Tuberculosis%20Report%202022.pdf">here</a> and <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022">here</a> to access):&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>India-specific findings</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The case notifications of people newly diagnosed with TB in India were 16,67,136 in 2015, 17,63,876 in 2016, 16,49,694 in 2017, 19,08,683 in 2018, 21,62,323 in 2019, 16,29,301 in 2020, and 19,65,444 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/covid-19-and-tb">click here</a> to access the data. &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Between 2019 and 2020, India witnessed a reduction of 24.65 percent in case notifications of people newly diagnosed with TB. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/covid-19-and-tb ">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Between 2019 and 2021, India faced a reduction of 9.1 percent in case notifications of people newly diagnosed with TB. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/covid-19-and-tb ">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Almost all (90 percent) of the global drop in the number of people newly diagnosed with TB and reported (notified) between 2019 and 2020 was accounted for by 10 countries; the top three, India, Indonesia and the Philippines, accounted for 67 percent. In 2021, 90 percent of the reduction compared with 2019 was accounted for by only five countries. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/covid-19-and-tb ">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Among the 30 high TB burden and 3 global TB watchlist countries, the largest relative reductions in annual notifications between 2019 and 2020 were (ordered according to the size of the relative reduction) in Philippines, Lesotho, Indonesia, Zimbabwe, India, Myanmar and Bangladesh (all &gt;20 percent). In 2021, there was considerable recovery in India, Indonesia and the Philippines, although not to 2019 levels. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/covid-19-and-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2021, eight countries accounted for more than two thirds of global TB cases: India (28 percent), Indonesia (9.2 percent), China (7.4 percent), the Philippines (7.0 percent), Pakistan (5.8 percent), Nigeria (4.4 percent), Bangladesh (3.6 percent) and Democratic Republic of the Congo (2.9 percent). Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-1-tb-incidence">click here</a> to access data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Trends in the TB incidence rate in the 30 high TB burden countries are mixed. Between 2020 and 2021, there were estimated increases in countries with major shortfalls in TB notifications in 2020 and 2021 (e.g. India, Indonesia, Myanmar, Philippines), while in others the previous decline in the TB incidence rate has slowed or stabilized. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-1-tb-incidence">click here</a> to access data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; TB incidence rates for India were 341 per lakh population in 2000, 340 per lakh population in 2001, 339 per lakh population in 2002, 337 per lakh population in 2003, 334 per lakh population in 2004, 329 per lakh population in 2005, 323 per lakh population in 2006, 316 per lakh population in 2007, 309 per lakh population in 2008, 300 per lakh population in 2009, 292 per lakh population in 2010, 284 per lakh population in 2011, 277 per lakh population in 2012, 270 per lakh population in 2013, 263 per lakh population in 2014, 256 per lakh population in 2015, 249 per lakh population in 2016, 234 per lakh population in 2017, 224 per lakh population in 2018, 214 per lakh population in 2019, 204 per lakh population in 2020, and 210 per lakh population in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-1-tb-incidence">click here</a> to access data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; TB case notification rates (of new and relapse cases) for India were 105 per lakh population in 2000, 101 per lakh population in 2001, 97 per lakh population in 2002, 96 per lakh population in 2003, 100 per lakh population in 2004, 100 per lakh population in 2005, 105 per lakh population in 2006, 109 per lakh population in 2007, 110 per lakh population in 2008, 110 per lakh population in 2009, 108 per lakh population in 2010, 105 per lakh population in 2011, 101 per lakh population in 2012, 96 per lakh population in 2013, 123 per lakh population in 2014, 126 per lakh population in 2015, 132 per lakh population in 2016, 122 per lakh population in 2017, 139 per lakh population in 2018, 156 per lakh population in 2019, 117 per lakh population in 2020, and 140 per lakh population in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-1-tb-incidence">click here</a> to access data. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2021, 82 percent of global TB deaths among HIV-negative people occurred in the WHO African and South-East Asia regions; India alone accounted for 36 percent. The African and South-East Asia regions accounted for 82 percent of the combined total of TB deaths in HIV-negative and HIV-positive people; India accounted for 32 percent. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-2-tb-mortality">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Trends in the number of TB deaths in the 30 high TB burden countries are mixed. Between 2019 and 2021, striking increases are estimated to have occurred in countries with major shortfalls in TB notifications in 2020 and 2021 (e.g. India, Indonesia, Myanmar, Philippines), while in others previous declines have slowed or stabilized. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-2-tb-mortality">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The estimated absolute numbers of TB deaths (HIV-positive and HIV-negative) in India were 7,10,000 in 2000, 7,00,000 in 2001, 6,90,000 in 2002, 6,70,000 in 2003, 6,50,000 in 2004, 6,40,000 in 2005, 6,30,000 in 2006, 6,30,000 in 2007, 5,90,000 in 2008, 5,80,000 in 2009, 5,50,000 in 2010, 5,40,000 in 2011, 5,30,000 in 2012, 5,20,000 in 2013, 4,90,000 in 2014, 4,70,000 in 2015, 4,60,000 in 2016, 4,60,000 in 2017, 4,60,000 in 2018, 4,50,000 in 2019, 4,80,000 in 2020, and 5,10,000 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-2-tb-mortality">click here</a> to access the data.<br /> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<br /> &bull; The estimated numbers of incident cases of Multidrug- and rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/RR-TB) were 1,49,000 in 2015, 1,44,000 in 2016, 1,35,000 in 2017, 129,000 in 2018, 123,000 in 2019, 1,17,000 in 2020, and 1,19,000 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-3-drug-resistant-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The countries with the largest share of incident cases of MDR/RR-TB in 2021 were India (26 percent of global cases), the Russian Federation (8.5 percent of global cases) and Pakistan (7.9 percent of global cases). Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-3-drug-resistant-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2019&ndash;2021, the first-ever national survey was completed in India; this was one of the largest surveys to date, with a sample size of about 3,20,000 people. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2.4-tb-prevalence-surveys">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2020, the first full year of the COVID-19 pandemic, there were particularly large absolute and relative reductions in India, Indonesia and Philippines, followed by some recovery in 2021.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The number&nbsp;of notifications of people newly diagnosed with TB (new and relapse cases, all forms) was 11,15,718 in 2000, 10,85,075 in 2001, 10,60,951 in 2002, 10,73,282 in 2003, 11,36,182 in 2004, 11,56,248 in 2005, 12,28,827 in 2006, 12,95,943 in 2007, 13,32,267 in 2008, 13,51,913 in 2009, 13,39,866 in 2010, 13,23,949 in 2011, 12,89,836 in 2012, 12,43,905 in 2013, 16,09,547 in 2014, 16,67,136 in 2015, 17,63,876 in 2016, 16,49,694 in 2017, 19,08,683 in 2018, 21,62,323 in 2019, 16,29,301 in 2020, and 19,65,444 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-1-case-notifications ">click here</a> to access the data. &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The number of estimated TB incident cases in India was 36,10,000 in 2000, 36,70,000 in 2001, 37,20,000 in 2002, 37,60,000 in 2003, 37,90,000 in 2004, 38,00,000 in 2005, 37,90,000 in 2006, 37,60,000 in 2007, 37,20,000 in 2008, 36,80,000 in 2009, 36,30,000 in 2010, 35,70,000 in 2011, 35,30,000 in 2012, 34,80,000 in 2013, 34,40,000 in 2014, 33,90,000 in 2015, 33,30,000 in 2016, 31,60,000 in 2017, 30,60,000 in 2018, 29,60,000 in 2019, 28,50,000 in 2020, and 29,50,000 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-1-case-notifications ">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The contribution of public-private mix (PPM) initiatives to total notifications was 2.3 percent in 2010, 0.26 percent in 2011, 0.24 percent in 2012, 6.0 percent in 2013, 12.0 percent in 2014, 11.0 percent in 2015, 17.0 percent in 2016, 23.0 percent in 2017, 26.0 percent in 2018, 28.0 percent in 2019, 31.0 percent in 2020, and 33.0 percent in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-1-case-notifications ">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The percentage of people in India newly diagnosed with pulmonary TB who were bacteriologically confirmed was 35 percent in 2000, 41 percent in 2001, 44 percent in 2002, 49 percent in 2003, 53 percent in 2004, 56 percent in 2005, 58 percent in 2006, 60 percent in 2007, 61 percent in 2008, 62 percent in 2009, 63 percent in 2010, 65 percent in 2011, 66 percent in 2012, 71 percent in 2013, 66 percent in 2014, 64 percent in 2015, 63 percent in 2016, 71 percent in 2017, 57 percent in 2018, 57 percent in 2019, 54 percent in 2020, and 66 percent in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-2-diagnostic-testing-for-tb--hiv-associated-tb-and-drug-resistant-tb">click here</a> to access the data</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The number of WHO-recommended rapid tests used per 1,00,000 population in the case of India was 258 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-2-diagnostic-testing-for-tb--hiv-associated-tb-and-drug-resistant-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The percentage of people in India initially tested for TB with a WHO-recommended rapid test who had a positive test was 24 percent in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-2-diagnostic-testing-for-tb--hiv-associated-tb-and-drug-resistant-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The number of WHO-recommended rapid diagnostic tests per person notified as a TB case (new and relapse cases, all forms) in India was 1.8 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-2-diagnostic-testing-for-tb--hiv-associated-tb-and-drug-resistant-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The estimated TB treatment coverage for India was 67 percent in 2021. The estimated TB treatment coverage among children aged 0&ndash;14 years for India was 32 percent in 2021. The estimated TB treatment coverage among children aged &gt;= 15 years for India was 71 percent in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-3-tb-treatment-and-treatment-coverage">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2021, ten countries accounted for 75 percent of the global gap between the estimated number of people who developed TB (incident TB cases) and the number of people who were detected with TB and officially reported. About 60 percent of the global gap was accounted for by five countries: India (24 percent), Indonesia (13 percent), the Philippines (10 percent), Pakistan (6.6 percent) and Nigeria (6.3 percent). Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-3-tb-treatment-and-treatment-coverage">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The estimated coverage of antiretroviral therapy for people living with HIV who developed TB for India 59 percent in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-3-tb-treatment-and-treatment-coverage">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The number of Indian people diagnosed with MDR/RR-TB was 3,288 in 2010, 4,297 in 2011, 17,253 in 2012, 18,888 in 2013, 25,748 in 2014, 28,876 in 2015, 37,258 in 2016, 39,009 in 2017, 58,347 in 2018, 66,255 in 2019, 49,679 in 2020, and 58,837 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-4-drug-resistant-tb-treatment">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The number of Indian people enrolled on MDR/RR-TB was 2,182 in 2010, 3,378 in 2011, 14,117 in 2012, 21,093 in 2013, 24,073 in 2014, 26,966 in 2015, 32,914 in 2016, 35,950 in 2017, 47,284 in 2018, 60,858 in 2019, 42,505 in 2020, and 53,037 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-4-drug-resistant-tb-treatment">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The number of Indian people enrolled on MDR/RR-TB was 2,182 in 2010, 3,378 in 2011, 14,117 in 2012, 21,093 in 2013, 24,073 in 2014, 26,966 in 2015, 32,914 in 2016, 35,950 in 2017, 47,284 in 2018, 60,858 in 2019, 42,505 in 2020, and 53,037 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-4-drug-resistant-tb-treatment">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The WHO regions with the best treatment coverage are the European Region and the Region of the Americas. Among the 30 high MDR/RR-TB burden countries, those with the best treatment coverage are 2021: Peru, the Russian Federation, Azerbaijan, the Republic of Moldova, India and Kazakhstan. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-4-drug-resistant-tb-treatment">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The estimated treatment coverage for MDR/RR-TB for India was 45 percent in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-4-drug-resistant-tb-treatment">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Seven countries (India, Nigeria, South Africa, Uganda, United Republic of Tanzania, Zambia and Zimbabwe) each reported initiating over 200 000 people with HIV on TB preventive treatment in 2021, accounting collectively for 82 percent of the 2.8 million reported globally. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-prevention">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Since 2014, spending on the diagnosis and treatment of drug-susceptible TB has fallen slightly. Spending on treatment of multidrug and rifampicin-resistant TB (MDR/RR-TB) has increased steadily since 2010: this growth is largely explained by trends in the BRICS group of countries (i.e., Brazil, Russian Federation, India, China and South Africa). Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/financing-for-tb">click here</a> to access the data. &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Bangladesh, Cambodia, China and Zambia are examples of high TB burden countries that have steadily increased domestic funding specifically allocated to NTPs (as opposed to funding allocated more generally for inpatient and outpatient care, including for people with TB) in recent years. There was a considerable reduction in domestic spending in India between 2020 and 2021; one explanation for this was less need for spending on second-line anti-TB drugs in 2021, given stocks that still existed from 2020. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/financing-for-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The international funding (at constant 2021 US$) for national TB programmes on TB prevention, diagnostic and treatment services was 37 million in 2010, 65 million in 2011, 61 million in 2012, 143 million in 2013, 92 million in 2014, 142 million in 2015, 135 million in 2016, 187 million in 2017, 170 million in 2018, 91 million in 2019, 85 million in 2020, and 154 million in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/financing-for-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The domestic funding (at constant 2021 US$) for national TB programmes on TB prevention, diagnostic and treatment services was 56 million in 2010, 60 million in 2011, 44 million in 2012, 85 million in 2013, 162 million in 2014, 132 million in 2015, 139 million in 2016, 305 million in 2017, 348 million in 2018, 365 million in 2019, 326 million in 2020, and 183 million in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/financing-for-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In the case of India, the sources of funding and funding gaps reported for the TB-specific budgets included in national strategic plans for TB were domestic funding: 66 percent, Global Fund: 29 percent, and international funding (excluding Global Fund): 4.9 percent in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/financing-for-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The distribution of the two UHC indicators in the 30 high TB burden countries and three global TB watchlist countries shows that, in general, values improve with income level; this is especially evident for the SCI. Nonetheless, the risk of catastrophic health expenditures is high (15 or above) in several middle-income countries, including Angola, Bangladesh, Cambodia, China, India, and Nigeria. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/uhc-tb-determinants/6.1-universal-health-coverage">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; To achieve Universal Health Coverage (UHC), substantial increases in investment in health are critical. From 2000 to 2019 there was a striking increase in health expenditure (from all sources) per capita in a few high TB burden countries, especially the upper-middle-income countries of Brazil, China, South Africa and Thailand. A steady upward trend was evident in Bangladesh, Ethiopia, India, Indonesia, Lesotho, Mongolia, Mozambique, the Philippines and Viet Nam, and there was a noticeable rise from 2012 to 2017 in Myanmar. Elsewhere, however, levels of spending have been relatively stable, and at generally much lower levels. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/uhc-tb-determinants/6.1-universal-health-coverage">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The current health expenditures per capita were US$ 86 in 2000, US$ 96 in 2001, US$ 99 in 2002, US$ 101 in 2003, US$ 109 in 2004, US$ 114 in 2005, US$ 119 in 2006, US$ 126 in 2007, US$ 131 in 2008, US$ 139 in 2009, US$ 141 in 2010, US$ 146 in 2011, US$ 162 in 2012, US$ 190 in 2013, US$ 189 in 2014, US$ 197 in 2015, US$ 205 in 2016, US$ 182 in 2017, US$ 196 in 2018, and US$ 211 in 2019.&nbsp;Kindly <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/uhc-tb-determinants/6.1-universal-health-coverage">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The estimated number of TB cases attributable to alcohol use disorders was 2,58,000, diabetes was 1,05,000, HIV was 93,000, smoking was 1,10,000 and undernourishment was 7,38,000 in 2021. Kindly <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/uhc-tb-determinants/6-3-tb-determinants">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Based on the latest available data in the World Bank database, some upper-middle-income and lower-middle-income countries (e.g. Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, Mongolia, South Africa, Thailand, and Viet Nam) appear to be performing relatively well. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/uhc-tb-determinants/6-3-tb-determinants">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Three new antigen-based skin tests for TB infection that perform better than tuberculin skin tests (particularly in terms of specificity) were evaluated and recommended by WHO in 2022; these are the Cy-Tb skin test, Serum Institute of India, India; C-TST, Anhui Zhifei Longcom Biopharmaceutical Co. Ltd, China; and Diaskintest, JSC Generium, Russian Federation. WHO plans to evaluate the following tests in the coming year: culture-free, targeted-sequencing solutions to test for drug resistance directly from sputum specimens; broth microdilution methods for drug-susceptibility testing (DST); and new IGRAs to test for TB infection. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-research-and-innovation">click here</a> to access the information.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In India, the Ministry of Health &amp; Family Welfare launched the 21-day TB Mukt Bharat Campaign at Ayushman Bharat Health and Wellness Centres (AB-HWCs), from 24 March to 14 April 2022. The campaign aimed to meaningfully engage community and civil society to build a people&rsquo;s movement to end TB. It was celebrated across 75 228 AB-HWCs; a total of 6 801 956 people were screened for TB, and 38 328 community awareness activities took place using 21 479 trained TB champions. Linked to this initiative, primary health care teams led by the newly introduced cadre of community health officers (CHOs) provide people-centred TB services to people&rsquo;s doorsteps. AB-HWCs are playing an important role in improving awareness, identifying TB symptoms at an early stage, offering treatment adherence and psychosocial support to individuals and families with TB, and creating a strong network of TB survivors to strengthen the TB response. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/featured-topics/civil-society-engagement">click here</a> to access the more information.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; WHO has been advancing MAF-TB efforts to strengthen the engagement of the private sector and other public care providers not linked to national TB programmes (NTPs) through a new initiative with the Bill &amp; Melinda Gates Foundation. The initiative promotes the development of enhanced PPM data dashboards in seven priority countries: Bangladesh, India, Indonesia, Kenya, Nigeria, Pakistan and the Philippines. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/featured-topics/maf-tb">click here</a> to get more information.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; India has developed a national multisectoral action framework for TB; this strategic document makes a strong case for transforming India&rsquo;s TB elimination efforts from a health sector struggle to a whole-of-society responsibility. The framework is a guide for policy-makers and a call to action for communities, civil society, the private sector, and other partners and stakeholders. The overarching goal is to strengthen the country&rsquo;s capacity for a multisectoral response that facilitates TB elimination by 2025, with the key objective being to achieve policy convergence and adopt a health-in-all approach. The framework highlights the six key strategic areas for integrated action: integrated health care service delivery; TB-free workplaces; socioeconomic support for patients; awareness generation and infection control; corporate social responsibility and investment in TB; and targeted intervention for key affected populations. It defines the list of government ministries and other stakeholders, and the strategic scope of collaboration with each of them. Also, the framework acknowledges the importance of resources for defined strategic areas (e.g. financing, capacity-building, technical resources and research), and calls on partners and governments to mobilize resources for its implementation. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/featured-topics/maf-tb">click here</a> to get more information.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The key findings of the report titled [inside]Rural Health Statistics 2020-21 (released in May 2022)[/inside], which has been prepared by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, are as follows (please <a href="/upload/files/Rural%20Health%20Statistics%202020-21.pdf">click here</a> to access):</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; As on 31st March, 2021, there were 1,56,101 and 1,718 Sub Centres (SCs), 25,140 and 5,439 Primary Health Centres (PHCs), and 5,481 and 470 Community Health Centres (CHCs), respectively, which were functioning in rural and urban areas of the country.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average rural population covered by a Sub Centre was 5,734 as on 1st July, 2021, whereas the norm is that one Sub Centre should be serving a population of size in the range 300-5,000.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average population in tribal/ hilly/ desert areas covered by a Sub Centre was 3,839 as on 1st July, 2021, whereas the norm is that one Sub Centre should be serving a population of size up to 3,000 in such areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; A Sub Centre is the most peripheral and first contact point between the primary health care system and the community. Sub Centres are assigned tasks relating to interpersonal communication in order to bring about behavioral change and provide services in relation to maternal and child health, family welfare, nutrition, immunisation, diarrhoea control and control of communicable diseases programmes. Each Sub Centre is required to be manned by at least one auxiliary nurse midwife (ANM) / female health worker and one male health worker. Under the National Rural Health Mission (NRHM), there is a provision for one additional second ANM on contract basis. One lady health visitor (LHV) is entrusted with the task of supervision of six Sub Centres. The Government of India bears the salary of ANM and LHV while the salary of the Male Health Worker is borne by the state governments.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average rural population covered by a Primary Health Centre (PHC) was 35,602 as on 1st July, 2021, whereas the norm is that one PHC should be serving a population of size in the range 20,000-30,000.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average population in tribal/ hilly/ desert areas covered by a PHC was 25,507 as on 1st July, 2021, whereas the norm is that one PHC should be serving a population of size up to 20,000 in such areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; PHC is the first contact point between the village community and the medical officer. The PHCs were envisaged to provide an integrated curative and preventive health care to the rural population with emphasis on preventive and promotive aspects of health care. The PHCs are established and maintained by the state governments under the Minimum Needs Programme (MNP)/ Basic Minimum Services (BMS) Programme. As per minimum requirement, a PHC is to be manned by a medical officer supported by 14 paramedical and other staff. Under NRHM, there is a provision for two additional staff nurses at PHCs on contract basis. It acts as a referral unit for 6 Sub Centres and has 4-6 beds for patients. The activities of PHC involve curative, preventive, promotive and family welfare services.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average rural population covered by a Community Health Centre (CHC) was 1,63,298 as on 1st July, 2021, whereas the norm is that one CHC should be serving a population of size in the range 80,000-1,20,000.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average population in tribal/ hilly/ desert areas covered by a CHC was 1,03,756 as on 1st July, 2021, whereas the norm is that one CHC should be serving a population of size up to 80,000 in such areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; CHCs are being established and maintained by the state government under Minimum Needs Program (MNP)/Basic Minimum Services (BMS) programme. As per minimum norms, a CHC is required to be manned by four medical specialists i.e. surgeon, physician, gynecologist and pediatrician supported by 21 paramedical and other staff. It has 30 indoor beds with one OT, X-ray, labour room and laboratory facilities. It serves as a referral centre for 4 PHCs and also provides facilities for obstetric care and specialist consultations.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Rural Health Care System in India</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Out of the sanctioned posts, a significant percentage of posts were vacant at all the levels. Nearly 21.1 percent of the sanctioned posts of Health Worker (Female)/ Auxiliary Nurse Midwife-ANM (at SCs and PHCs) were vacant as compared to 41.9 percent vacancies of Health Worker (Male) in 2021 at SCs. At PHCs, 64.2 percent of the sanctioned posts of Health Assistant (Male and Female) and 21.8 percent of the sanctioned posts of Doctors were vacant in 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The availability of manpower is one of the important prerequisites for the efficient functioning of the Rural Health services. As on 31st March, 2021, the overall shortfall (which excludes the existing surplus in some of the states) in the posts of Health Worker (Female) / ANM was 2.9 percent of the total requirement as per the norm of one HW(F)/ ANM per Sub Centre and PHC. The overall shortfall was mainly due to shortfall in states of Uttar Pradesh (1,871), Himachal Pradesh (1,253), Gujarat (616), Odisha (397), Tripura (380), and Uttarakhand (252).&nbsp;Similarly, in case of Health Worker (Male), there was a shortfall of 66.1 percent of the requirement. There was a vacancy of 21.1 percent for HW (Female)/ ANM (at SCs and PHCs) as compared to the sanctioned posts. There was a vacancy of 41.9 percent for Health Worker (Male) as compared to the sanctioned posts in 2021 at SCs. At PHCs, 64.2 percent of the sanctioned posts of Health Assistant (Male and Female) and 21.8 percent of the sanctioned posts of Doctors were vacant in 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; PHC is the first contact point between the village community and the Medical Officer. Manpower in PHC includes a Medical Officer supported by paramedical and other staff. In the case of PHC, for Health Assistant (male + female), the shortfall was 72.2 percent. For allopathic doctors at PHC, there was a shortfall of 4.3 percent of the total requirement at the national level. This happened due to a significant shortfall of doctors at PHCs in the states of Odisha (362), Karnataka (340), and Chhattisgarh (271).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The Community Health Centres provide specialised medical care of Surgeons, Obstetricians &amp; Gynecologists, Physicians and Pediatricians. The position of specialists manpower at CHCs as on 31st March, 2021 shows that out of the sanctioned posts, 72.3 percent of Surgeons, 64.2 percent of Obstetricians &amp; Gynecologists, 69.2 percent of physicians, and 67.1 percent of pediatricians were vacant. Overall 68 percent of the sanctioned posts of specialists at CHCs were vacant in rural areas. Moreover, as compared to requirements for existing infrastructure, there was a shortfall of 83.2 percent of Surgeons, 74.2 percent of Obstetricians &amp; Gynecologists, 82.2 percent of Physicians, and 80.6 percent of Pediatricians. Overall, there was a shortfall of 79.9 percent of specialists at the CHCs as compared to the requirement for existing CHCs. The shortfall of specialists was significantly high in most of the states. However, in addition to the specialists, about 17,012 General Duty Medical Officers (GDMOs) Allopathic and 514 AYUSH Specialists along with 2,955 GDMO AYUSH were also available at CHCs as on 31st March, 2021. In addition to this, there were 805 Anaesthetists and 289 Eye Surgeons available at CHCs as on 31st March, 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Comparison of the manpower position of major categories in 2021 with that in 2020 shows an overall increase in the number of ANMs at SCs &amp; PHCs and Doctors at PHCs during the period. However, there was a marginal decrease in the number of Specialists at CHCs. There was an increase of ANMs at SCs &amp; PHCs from 2,12,593 in 2020 to 2,14,820 in 2021 and Doctors at PHCs from 28,516 in 2020 to 31,716 in 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Considering the status of paramedical staff, there was an increase of Lab Technicians from 19,903 in 2020 to 22,723 in 2021 at PHCs and CHCs. There was an increase in the number of pharmacists from 25,792 in 2020 to 28,537 in 2021. A significant increase was also observed for nursing staff under PHC &amp; CHCs from 71,847 in 2020 to 79,044 in 2021. The number of radiographers decreased from 2,434 in 2020 to 2,418 in 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; A total of 1,224 Sub Divisional/ Sub District Hospitals were functioning as on 31st March, 2021 throughout the country. In these hospitals, 15,274 doctors were available. In addition to these doctors, nearly 42,073 paramedical staffs were also available at those hospitals as on 31st March, 2021. The number of doctors in Sub Divisional/ Sub District Hospitals increased from 13,399 in 2020 to 15,274 in 2021. The number of paramedical staff in Sub Divisional/ Sub District Hospitals also went up from 29,937 in 2020 to 42,073 in 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In addition to the above, 764 District Hospitals (DHs) were also functioning as on 31st March, 2021 throughout the country. There were 26,929 doctors available in the DHs. In addition to the doctors, roughly 90,435 paramedical staff were also available at District Hospitals as on 31st March, 2021. The number of doctors in District Hospitals went up from 22,827 in 2020 to 26,929 in 2021. The number of paramedical staff in District Hospitals increased from 80,920 in 2020 to 90,435 in 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The key findings of the report titled [inside]India TB Report 2022: Coming Together to End TB Altogether (released in March 2022)[/inside], which has been produced by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, are as follows (please <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/TB%20Annual%20Report%202022.pdf">click here</a> to access):&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; As per the Global TB Report 2021, the estimated incidence of all forms of TB in India for the year 2020 was 188 per 100,000 population (129-257 per 100,000 population).&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The total number of incident tuberculosis i.e., TB patients (new and relapse) notified during 2021 was 19,33,381 which was 19 percent higher than that of 2020 (16,28,161). The programme had been able to catch-up with the dip in TB notifications that was observed around the months when the two major covid waves happened in India.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The estimated incidence of all forms of TB in India as per Global TB report was 456 per lakh population in 2010, 437 per lakh population in 2011, 420 per lakh population in 2012, 404 per lakh population in 2013, 350 per lakh population in 2014, 328 per lakh population in 2015, 303 per lakh population in 2016, 286 per lakh population in 2017, 276 per lakh population in 2018, 266 per lakh population in 2019, and 257 per lakh population in 2020.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The estimated number of Multidrug-resistant (MDR) and Extensively drug-resistant (XDR) TB cases to have been put on treatment as per the global TB report 2021 was 4 per 100,000 and 1 per 100,000 population, respectively.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; During the pandemic, a significant reduction was observed in the total number of&nbsp;Drug-Resistant TB&nbsp;(DR-TB) patients started on treatment as compared to 2019. In 2020 and 2021, there was a reduction of 14 percent and 9 percent in the number MDR patients put on treatment as compared to the&nbsp;estimated numbers.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The estimated mortality rate among all forms of TB was 37 per 100,000 population (34-40 per 100,000 population) in 2020, as per the Global TB Report 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; There has been a slight increase in the mortality rate due to all forms of TB between 2019 and 2020 by 11 percent in the country.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In absolute numbers, the total number of estimated deaths from all forms of TB excluding HIV, for 2020 was 4.93 lakhs (4.53-5.36 lakhs) in the country, which was 13 percent higher that of the year 2019 estimate. &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; As per Nikshay, the total number of reported deaths among Drug sensitive (DS-TB) notified in 2020 was 76,002 (4.3 percent of the total notifications of 2020) which is 15.4 percent of the estimate for the country, thus emphasizing the importance of establishing a &ldquo;TB Death Surveillance and Response&rdquo; system in line with the maternal mortality surveillance to improve the coverage and real time resolution of lacunae including the system related factors.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; A recent systematic review (2020) estimating the direct&nbsp;and indirect patient costs of drug-sensitive and drug-resistant TB care in India reports that 7 to 32 percent of among DS-TB patients and 68 percent of DR-TB were experiencing catastrophic costs for TB care in India.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2021, among 21,35,830 patients diagnosed, 20,30,509 (95 percent) patients were put on treatment. 61 percent were male and 39 percent were female among the patients put on treatment.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Among the total notification, 6 percent patients were in paediatric age group. Among 17,51,437 TB patients notified in 2020, 83 percent were successfully treated while 4 percent died during treatment.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2021, 48,232 MDR/RR-TB patients were diagnosed and 43,380 (90 percent) were put on treatment. 8,455 Pre-XDR-TB, 376 XDR-TB and 13,724 H mono/poly patients were diagnosed and 7,562 (89 percent), 333 (89 percent) and 12,008 (87 percent) were put on treatment respectively.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; A total of 1939 patients were initiated on shorter oral Bdq-containing MDR/RR-TB regimen, 23,889 on longer M/XDR-TB regimen and 25,235 patients were initiated on shorter injection containing MDR-TB regimen.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The cohort of DR-TB patients initiated on treatment in 2019 reported 57 percent treatment success rate (34,535/60,873). This includes 39,358 of patients on shorter MDR-TB regimen (inj-containing) with 59 percent treatment success rate and 1,280 of patient on longer oral regimen with 70 percent treatment success rate. This cohort also includes 11,791 patients put on old conventional MDR-TB regimen that has reported 49 percent treatment success rate.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Available evidence and modelling studies indicate that nearly 20 percent of all TB cases in India may suffer from Diabetes Mellitus (DM).&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Under the&nbsp;National Tuberculosis Elimination Programme&nbsp;(NTEP), in 2021, out of the 74 percent of the known tobacco usage among all TB patients, 12 percent of TB patients were reported to be tobacco users. Among those screened, 30 percent were linked to tobacco cessation services.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Of all the notified TB patients, 95 percent know their HIV status. (Public: 96 percent, Private: 92 percent).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Nearly 95 percent of TB Detection Centres (TDCs) have co-located HIV testing facilities.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; More than 96 percent of&nbsp;People Living With HIV/AIDS&nbsp;(PLHIV) visiting the antiretroviral therapy (ART) centres every month are screened for existing TB symptoms.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; As per Nikshay data, the linkage of HIV-TB co-infected patients to Cotrimoxazole Preventive Therapy (CPT) and Antiretroviral Therapy in 2021 were 93 percent &amp; 95 percent, respectively.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Kindly click <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/JSA-Press-Statement-UB-2022-23-English-Final.pdf">here</a> and <a href="https://im4change.org/latest-news-updates/union-health-budget-2022-23-has-completely-overlooked-the-lessons-of-the-covid-19-epidemic-says-jan-swasthya-abhiyan.html">here</a> to access the [inside]Press release by Jan Swasthya Abhiyan dated February 2, 2022[/inside] on the Union Health Budget 2022-23.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">---</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The COVID-19 pandemic has devastated families and communities and disrupted societies and economies. Patients had to endure various indignities in both public and private hospitals without protections or recourse to adequate preventive and redressal mechanisms. While the COVID-19 vaccine is seen as a solution to the pandemic, its roll-out has also been rife with inequalities. However, many of the problems we have seen at this time stem from the deep-rooted problems in the public health system. A critical look at India&quot;s health system from the perspective of its patients is overdue.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Oxfam India undertook two rapid surveys on Patient&quot;s Rights Charter and COVID-19 vaccination through self-administered questionnaires, covering 28 states and 5 Union territories; as such, this bears the limitations arising from it being a self-selected sample. The former was done between February and April 2021 and received 3890 responses while the latter was done between August and September 2021 covering 10,955 respondents. Given the distinctive focus of each survey, both are presented separately.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The key findings of the survey on Patient&#39;s Rights done for Oxfam India report titled [inside]Securing Rights of Patients in India: Lessons from rapid surveys on peoples&rsquo; experiences of Patient&rsquo;s Rights Charter and the COVID-19 vaccination drive (released on 18 November, 2021)[/inside] are as follows (please <a href="/upload/files/Securing%20Rights%20of%20Patients%20in%20India%20by%20Oxfam%20India.pdf">click here</a> to access):&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; This captures some of the experience of patients with both the public and private healthcare system over the last decade with a focus on the provisions of the Patients &quot;Rights Charter.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Right to Confidentiality, Human Dignity and Privacy: Over a third of women (35 percent) said that they had to undergo a physical examination by a male practitioner without another female present in the room.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Right to Information: 74 percent of people said that the doctor simply wrote the prescription or treatment or asked them to get tests/ investigations done without explaining their disease, nature and/or cause of illness.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Right to Informed Consent: More than half of the respondents (57 percent) who were themselves/ their relatives had been hospitalised did not receive any information about investigations and tests being done.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Right to Second Opinion: At least a third of respondents who had themselves/ their relatives hospitalised said their doctor did not allow a second opinion.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Right to Non-Discrimination: A third of Muslim respondents and over 20 percent Dalit and Adivasi respondents reported feeling discriminated against on the grounds of their religion or caste in a hospital/ by a healthcare professional.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Right to Choose Source of Obtaining Medicine or Test: 8 in 10 respondents reported being asked to get tests/diagnostics from one place only.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Right to Transparency in Rates and Care According to Prescribed Rates: 58 percent of people of those who had themselves/ their relatives hospitalised, said that they were not provided with an estimated cost of treatment/procedure before the start of treatment/procedure. Three in every 10 people surveyed reported being denied case papers, patient records, investigation reports for treatment/ procedure by the hospital even after requesting the same.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Right to Take Discharge of Patient or Receive Body of Deceased from the Hospital: 19 percent of respondents whose close relatives were hospitalized said that they were denied the release of the dead body by the hospital</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em>The COVID-19 pandemic has deepened existing structural inequalities in the healthcare system. The report recommends:</em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The MoHFW should set up a mechanism to review the present status of adoption of the Patient&quot;s Rights Charter (PRC) in all states and UTs and order its immediate adoption. It should include the PRC in the Clinical Establishment Act (CEA) and issue a letter to the states and Union territories (UTs) for displaying PRC in all private and public hospitals in view of the unprecedented crisis induced by the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly for hospitals taking part in the Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (PMJAY).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The State and UT governments should issue orders to display the PRC in all private and public hospitals irrespective of adoption of CEA and ensure grievance redressal mechanisms for patients, through the appointment of an internal grievance officer within every public and private clinical establishment.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The National Medical Commission should introduce mandatory modules on patients &quot;rights in the healthcare curriculum.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em>Some of the key findings from the survey of the experiences of the vaccination drive were:</em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Eight out of 10 people said that they do not think that the government will be able to vaccinate all adults by December 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; 80 percent of people believed that it is more difficult for a daily wage worker to get the vaccine as compared to a salaried, middle-class person. Most did not think that the experience was equitable.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; With respect to how the government should address inequity in vaccination, some specific suggestions were:&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">- 83 percent believed that all vaccination should be done completely free of cost through the government, like previous vaccination drives.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">- Only 2 percent of respondents were in favour of a tax on essentials like fuel to fund the vaccination. 55 percent believed that imposing a one-time tax of 1 percent on the net-worth of India&quot;s richest 1000 families was the best mode of funding.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">- 89 percent of people said that the operational hours of vaccination centres should be expanded beyond 9 AM-5 PM.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">- 95 percent of people from all age categories felt that vaccination must be brought closer to the elderly, persons with disabilities and informal sector workers by making use of mobile vans, vaccination camps and home-based vaccination.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">- 88 percent believed that the government must ensure that marginalized groups such as street dwellers, migrant workers, immigrants, refugees and asylum seekers are given access to<br /> vaccination without having to furnish documentation.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">- Improve information about vaccination. 74 percent of respondents earned less than INR 10,000 per month and over 60 percent of respondents from marginalized and minority communities felt that the government has failed in informing them about how and when to get vaccinated. Eight in 10 felt that the government had been changing its COVID-19 vaccine policies too frequently.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">- 89 percent of people said that the government must do more to ramp vaccine production, especially through public sector companies.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">- The experiences of vaccination show the</p> <p style="text-align:justify">-- Challenges with vaccination:</p> <p style="text-align:justify">---29 percent said that they either had to make multiple visits to the vaccination centre or stand in long queues.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">---22 percent faced issues in booking the slot online or had to try for multiple days ahead to get a slot</p> <p style="text-align:justify">---9 percent people said that they had to lose a day&#39;s wages to get themselves vaccinated.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">-- Reason for not getting vaccinated:</p> <p style="text-align:justify">---43 percent respondents stated that they could not get vaccinated because the vaccination centre had run out of vaccines when they visited the centre.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">---12 percent did not get vaccinated because they could not afford the high prices of vaccines.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The lessons from the COVID-19 vaccination drive, would not only help to improve the current response but can derive learnings improving equitable administration of any vaccine in future.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">-All vaccination should continue to be done completely free of cost through the government system; avoid the use of private hospitals to deliver vaccination;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">-Proactively release timely information on vaccination strategies, modalities and accomplishments in disaggregated, user-friendly and open source formats;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">-Prioritise allocation, distribution and administration of vaccines for marginalized, poor, vulnerable, excluded communities first, of course along with for those who are at risk;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">-Maintain record and release disaggregated data on vaccination coverage based on social and economic groups including Dalits(Scheduled Caste), Adivasis(Scheduled Tribes), Muslims, and Persons with Disabilities (PwD);<br /> &nbsp;<br /> -Bring vaccination closer to the vulnerable and extend operational hours of vaccination centres beyond 9 AM-5 PM to allow for vaccination without a loss of wages;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">-Improve information dissemination about vaccination; existing technology-based mechanisms for disseminating information about vaccination centres locations and availability of vaccines is not sufficient. It would be important to build robust and functional grievance redressal mechanisms, from national to local, to address emerging challenges. Adequate flexibility must be given to local health administrations to adapt to local circumstances;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">-Further ramp up vaccine production, especially through the use of public sector companies.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The report titled [inside]&#39;COVID-19 Third Wave Preparedness: Children&rsquo;s Vulnerability and Recovery&#39; (released on 2nd August, 2021)[/inside] is the outcome of a two-part series of online consultative meetings hosted by National Institute of Disaster Management (NIDM, Delhi). These working group consultative meetings largely included &nbsp;stakeholders from diverse backgrounds -- Central &nbsp;Government, State &nbsp;Governments, Civil Society Organisations (CSOs), social workers, humanitarians, academicians, scientists and researchers. Drawing lessons from the first and second waves, through the deliberations by leading experts during these meetings, the NIDM has been able to produce in the form of final outcome, recommendations for the preparedness of the third wave on the issues related to children and women and their well-being. Kindly <a href="/upload/files/NIDM%20report.pdf">click here</a> to access the report.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The consultative meetings held by NIDM with various stakeholders strongly recommended: a home care model, ramping up of vaccination especially for parents, nurses and other front-line workers, immediate recruitment of healthcare staffs and medical facilities for children, guarantee food security especially for the vulnerable amongst vulnerable, strengthen the community level engagement and risk awareness and communication, zero tolerance towards sexual abuse of children and women and raising awareness through a massive public outreach campaign. There is a huge gap between urban and rural India in terms of awareness, digitisation and medical facilities. It seems like the pandemic outbreak has only exacerbated social inequities and highlighted shortcomings of our society. Hence, the government must prioritise rural India and vulnerable groups in order to cope with the ongoing pandemic. This special report also outlines the women-children complementarity, suggesting that a child&rsquo;s inclusive growth largely depends on that of the mother.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">---</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> The <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/Inequality%20Report%202021%20Indias%20Unequal%20Healthcare%20Story.pdf">report</a> titled Inequality Report 2021: India&#39;s Unequal Healthcare Story examines the status of inequality across various indicators of health among different sections of the population from 2005-06 to 2015-16. The report analyses the government interventions made in terms of health programmes and its impact on health inequality. It also includes ground experiences of people, particularly the marginalised groups, during the pandemic.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The key findings of the [inside]Oxfam India&#39;s Inequality Report 2021: India&#39;s Unequal Healthcare Story (released on 19th July, 2021)[/inside] are as follows (please <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/Inequality%20Report%202021%20Indias%20Unequal%20Healthcare%20Story.pdf">click here</a> to access):&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Growing socio-economic inequalities in India are disproportionately affecting health outcomes of marginalised groups due to the absence of Universal Health Coverage (UHC), reveals Oxfam <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/Inequality%20Report%202021%20Indias%20Unequal%20Healthcare%20Story.pdf">India&rsquo;s Inequality Report</a> <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/Inequality%20Report%202021%20Indias%20Unequal%20Healthcare%20Story.pdf">2021: India&rsquo;s Unequal Healthcare Story</a>.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The new <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/Inequality%20Report%202021%20Indias%20Unequal%20Healthcare%20Story.pdf">report</a> by Oxfam India provides a comprehensive analysis of the health outcomes across different socioeconomic groups to gauge the level of health inequality that persists in the country. The report shows the general category performs better than Scheduled Castes-SCs and Scheduled Tribes-STs; Hindus perform better than Muslims; the rich perform better than the poor; men are better off than women; and the urban population is better off than the rural population on various health indicators. The COVID-19 pandemic has further exacerbated these inequalities.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The public healthcare system in India with its weak and understaffed infrastructure has been overburdened with the consistently rising cases. Private healthcare providers, on the other hand, were charging exorbitant prices, preventing the middle-class and the poor from getting diagnosed and treated until the government intervened to cap their prices. Even then, private healthcare has remained inaccessible to the poor while the rich have easily availed its services. As such, the poor and the vulnerable have mostly been dependent on the overburdened public healthcare facilities &mdash; with insufficient number of beds and inadequate human resources &mdash; for treatment or have gone without being diagnosed and treated.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Health inequalities are linked to and reflect socio-economic inequalities. Often times, it is the socio-economically marginalised communities that suffer from ill-health the most. The ongoing pandemic has revealed that the health systems in most countries are under-prepared to cope with any major health emergency and its unequal impact on the have and the have-nots.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Over the last few decades, India has made great progress in healthcare provisioning. Yet, progressively, the trend has been towards supporting the growth of the private sector in healthcare. This growth has only exacerbated the existing inequalities leaving the poor and the marginalised with no viable healthcare provisions. High costs of health services and lack of quality leads to further impoverishment of the disadvantaged.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The private health sector provided only 5-10 percent of total patient care when India gained independence. Today, it accounts for 66 percent of hospitalization and non-hospitalization cases and 33 percent of institutional births. This growth has been boosted by government concessions and has attracted domestic and foreign companies to set up tertiary care and super speciality hospitals. Within the country, the private formal sector has a distinct customer base. They are the urban-rich. Dehury et al. writes that private hospitals &lsquo;cater to a pool of patient community having health insurance, corporate tie-ups and referrals from general physicians. Usually, the paying capacity of these patients [are] higher than the common Indian citizen&hellip;these hospitals cater to the Indian elite class and organized sector workers having all financial protection.&rsquo;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The private sector is geared towards profits whereas the public provisioning of health services ensures that the poor and the marginalised have equal access to quality healthcare services closer to home. India&rsquo;s public health provisioning has, however, been weak. The public expenditure on health by the central government as a percentage of GDP was a mere 0.32 percent in 2019-20.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The combined expenditure by state and central government was about 1.16 percent of the GDP in 2019, rising marginally by 0.02 percent from 2018 &mdash; falling far behind the goal of making health expenditure 2.5 percent of the GDP. The per capita health expenditure is highest in Arunachal Pradesh at INR 9,854 and lowest in Bihar at INR 697. In the 2021-22 budget, the health ministry has been allocated a total of INR 76,901 crore, a decline of 9.8 percent from the revised estimates of 2020-21 at INR 85,250 crore.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Public funds for health has also been invested specifically in secondary and tertiary care rather than in the provisioning of primary healthcare. &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The public sector has prioritized secondary and tertiary care over primary care. Yet, experts acknowledge that primary care is the cornerstone of achieving equitable delivery and access to quality healthcare by all. While focus has been put on achieving Universal Healthcare in India; the government has selectively adopted the insurance model as a way to universalise healthcare instead of enhancing the primary health care system. As such, access to good quality public healthcare has remained fragmented and India is still far away from achieving universal coverage. The rich can avail healthcare from high-end private providers but the poor are stuck with a difficult choice. They either have to incur debts by availing health care from private providers or depend on a poor public healthcare system.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The Planning Commission in 2011 had observed that expenditure in secondary and tertiary care was drawing away attention from primary health services. Research studies substantiate this position and it is argued that &lsquo;[s]ubstantial proportions of the health budgets have been spent on&hellip;high-end tertiary medical services &mdash; all of which largely benefits the middle classes and detracts from the provision of public health services.&rsquo; Studies have also attributed India&rsquo;s high disease burden to the government&rsquo;s exclusive focus on the urban-oriented curative medical model. The government&rsquo;s focus on &lsquo;a heavily medicalized and hightech curative medical interventions&rsquo;&nbsp;has derailed the goal to make quality and affordable public healthcare accessible to all irrespective of their ability to pay. The result has been a widening of health inequalities along caste, class, gender and geography.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; To make the goals of National Health Mission (NRHM and National Urban Health Mission were subsumed under the NHM in 2013) a reality, there needs to be a strong public health infrastructure in place, even in hard-to-reach areas. Sufficient medical supplies, equipment, drugs and trained medical staff in health centres should be the standard. On the contrary, public health centres remain understaffed with limited supplies.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Among other things, the Inequality Report 2021 on health has recommended the government to increase health spending to 2.5 percent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) to ensure a more equitable health system in the country; ensure that union budgetary allocation in health for SCs and STs is proportionate to their population; prioritize primary health by ensuring that two-thirds of the health budget is allocated for strengthening primary healthcare; state governments to allocate their expenditure on health to 2.5 percent of Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP); the centre should extend financial support to the states with low per capita health expenditure to reduce inter-state inequality in health. It has asked to widen the ambit of insurance schemes to include out-patient care. The major expenditures on health happen through out-patient costs as consultations, diagnostic tests, medicines, etc. While the report does not endorse Government-financed Health Insurance Schemes (GFHIS) as a way to achieve UHC and stresses that insurance can only be a component of it, it is imperative that GFHIS widens its ambit to include outpatient costs as a way to reduce out-of-pocket expenditure (OOPE).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The Constitution of India does not guarantee a fundamental right to health though it does refer to the role of the government in the provisioning of healthcare to all its citizens. Therefore, the right to health should be enacted as a fundamental right that makes it obligatory for the government to ensure equal access to timely, acceptable, and affordable healthcare of appropriate quality, and address the underlying determinants of health to close the gap in health outcomes between the rich and poor.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; With the lockdown aimed at checking the spread of COVID-19, health systems prioritized services related only to COVID-19. Human and material resources like hospitals, beds and intensive care units were diverted towards the management and treatment of COVID-19 patients. Health services catering to non-Covid illnesses were halted, leading to unprecedented hardships and sufferings for chronic patients and those requiring immediate medical intervention such as pregnant women. Accessibility to non-Covid medical services were grimmer for patients in rural and hard-to-reach areas as compared to urban areas due to the unavailability of health centres in the vicinity and the lack of transportation facilities.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Disruptions in the availability of drugs for non-communicable diseases (NCD), tuberculosis (TB), contraceptive and other essential services were also reported. Telemedicine &mdash; the practice of caring for patients remotely &mdash; for which guidelines were issued by the Government of India in March 2020 to facilitate access to medical advice made consultations easier. However, for those with no smart phones and internet connectivity, particularly in rural and hard-to-reach areas, seeking medical advice remained a difficult task. The immunization drive was also disrupted. India vaccinates around 20 million children every year and its disruption might add to the largest number of unimmunized children in the world.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The National Health Profile in 2017 recorded one government allopathic doctor for every 10,189 people and one state-run hospital for every 90,343 people. India also ranks the lowest in the number of hospital beds per thousand population among the BRICS nations &mdash; Russia scores the highest (7.12), followed by China (4.3), South Africa (2.3), Brazil (2.1) and India (0.5). India also ranks lower than some of the lesser developed countries such as Bangladesh (0.87), Chile (2.11) and Mexico (0.98).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The current expenditure on health, by the Centre and the state governments combined, is only about 1.25 percent of GDP which is the lowest among the BRICS countries &mdash; Brazil (9.2) has the highest allocation, followed by South Africa (8.1), Russia (5.3) and China (5.0). It is also lower than some of its neighbouring countries such as Bhutan (2.5 percent) and Sri Lanka (1.6 percent). The low priority given to health expenditure is also reflected in the share in total expenditure of the government, which is only 4 percent whereas the global average stands at 11 percent. In Oxfam&rsquo;s Commitment to Reducing Inequality Report 2020, India ranks 154th in health spending, fifth from the bottom. This poor spending is reflected in the inadequate health resources and infrastructure. Only around 50,069 health and wellness centres (HWCs), which are envisaged to deliver comprehensive primary healthcare (CPHC) closer to homes, are functional. These centres are only 65 percent of the cumulative target for 2020-21. Moreover, in 2019, less than 10 percent of PHCs were funded as per IPHS norms whereas the rest remained underfunded.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Different studies have proved that low public health expenditure yields worse health outcomes. Studies by Barenberg et al. investigated the impact of public health expenditure on Infant Mortality Rate (IMR) and found a negative relationship between the two. Farahani et al. evaluated the relationship between state-level public health spending of India and individual mortality across all age groups using household-level data from the third National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3) showing that a 10 percent increase in public spending on health decreases mortality by about 2 percent, with effects mainly concentrated on women, the young, and the elderly.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The out-of-pocket health expenditure of 64.2 percent in India is higher than the world average of 18.2 percent. Exorbitant prices of healthcare has forced many to sell household assets and incur debts.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The global average for life expectancy is 72.6 years but India (69.42) remains below the global average. It is also lower than the neighbouring countries Nepal (70.8), Bhutan (71.8), Bangladesh (72.6), and Sri Lanka (77) and its BRICS counterparts Brazil (75.9), China (76.9), and Russia (72.6).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; A comprehensive provisioning of public health as water, sanitation and primary healthcare is the most efficient and cost-effective way to achieve UHC around the world.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Evidence from Thailand and Sri Lanka, which have performed better than India with regard to universal access to healthcare, shows that these countries have a high public provisioning of services. Also, evidence from developed countries like Germany, Sweden, Canada and developing countries like Costa Rica reveal that successful insurance-based healthcare system was attained with high levels of public spending and government provisioning of healthcare services.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The Oxfam India <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/Inequality%20Report%202021%20Indias%20Unequal%20Healthcare%20Story.pdf">report</a> says that &lsquo;Kerala invested in infrastructure to create a multi-layered health system, designed to provide first-contact access for basic services at the community level and expanded integrated primary healthcare coverage to achieve access to a range of preventive and curative services&hellip;[,] expanded the number of medical facilities, hospital beds, and doctors&hellip;[and] public health and social development initiatives&hellip; aided in creating the environment for a strong and effective primary care system.&rsquo;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="/upload/files/SOPonCOVID19Containment%26ManagementinPeriurbanRural%26tribalareas.pdf">click here</a> to access the [inside]Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) on COVID-19 Containment and Management in Peri-urban, Rural and Tribal areas[/inside] dated 16th May, 2021. The SOP was issued by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>---</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">The key findings of the report titled [inside]Rural Health Statistics 2019-20 (released in April 2021)[/inside], which has been prepared by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, are as follows (please <a href="/upload/files/Rural%20Health%20Statistics%202019-20%20report%20MoHFW%20latest%20available%282%29.pdf">click here</a> to access):</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; As on 31st March, 2020, there were 1,55,404 and 2,517 Sub Centres (SCs), 24,918 and 5,895 Primary Health Centres (PHCs) and 5,183 and 466 Community Health Centres (CHCs), respectively, which were functioning in rural and urban areas of the country.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average rural population covered by a Sub Centre was 5,729 as on 1st July, 2020, whereas the norm is that one Sub Centre should be serving a population of size in the range 300-5,000.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average population in tribal/ hilly/ desert areas covered by a Sub Centre was 3,381 as on 1st July, 2020, whereas the norm is that one Sub Centre should be serving a population of size up to 3,000 in such areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; A Sub Centre is the most peripheral and first contact point between the primary health care system and the community. Sub Centres are assigned tasks relating to interpersonal communication in order to bring about behavioral change and provide services in relation to maternal and child health, family welfare, nutrition, immunisation, diarrhoea control and control of communicable diseases programmes. Each Sub Centre is required to be manned by at least one auxiliary nurse midwife (ANM) / female health worker and one male health worker. Under the National Rural Health Mission (NRHM), there is a provision for one additional second ANM on contract basis. One lady health visitor (LHV) is entrusted with the task of supervision of six Sub Centres. The Government of India bears the salary of ANM and LHV while the salary of the Male Health Worker is borne by the state governments.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average rural population covered by a Primary Health Centre (PHC) was 35,730 as on 1st July, 2020, whereas the norm is that one Primary Health Centre should be serving a population of size in the range 20,000-30,000.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average population in tribal/ hilly/ desert areas covered by a PHC was 23,930 as on 1st July, 2020, whereas the norm is that one PHC should be serving a population of size up to 20,000 in such areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; PHC is the first contact point between the village community and the medical officer. The PHCs were envisaged to provide an integrated curative and preventive health care to the rural population with emphasis on preventive and promotive aspects of health care. The PHCs are established and maintained by the state governments under the Minimum Needs Programme (MNP)/ Basic Minimum Services (BMS) Programme. As per minimum requirement, a PHC is to be manned by a medical officer supported by 14 paramedical and other staff. Under NRHM, there is a provision for two additional staff nurses at PHCs on contract basis. It acts as a referral unit for 6 Sub Centres and has 4-6 beds for patients. The activities of PHC involve curative, preventive, promotive and family welfare services.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average rural population covered by a Community Health Centre was 1,71,779 as on 1st July, 2020, whereas the norm is that one Community Health Centre should be serving a population of size in the range 80,000-1,20,000.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average population in tribal/ hilly/ desert areas covered by a CHC was 97,178 as on 1st July, 2020, whereas the norm is that one CHC should be serving a population of size up to 80,000 in such areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; CHCs are being established and maintained by the state government under Minimum Needs Program (MNP)/Basic Minimum Services (BMS) programme. As per minimum norms, a CHC is required to be manned by four medical specialists i.e. surgeon, physician, gynecologist and pediatrician supported by 21 paramedical and other staff. It has 30 indoor beds with one OT, X-ray, labour room and laboratory facilities. It serves as a referral centre for 4 PHCs and also provides facilities for obstetric care and specialist consultations.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em>Rural Health Care System in India</em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Out of the sanctioned posts, a significant percentage of posts were vacant at all the levels. Nearly 14.1 percent of the sanctioned posts of Health Worker (Female)/ ANM (at SCs +PHCs) were vacant as compared to 37 percent vacancies of Health Worker (Male) in 2020. At PHCs, 37.6 percent of the sanctioned posts of Health Assistant (Male + Female) and 24.1 percent of the sanctioned posts of Doctors were vacant in 2020.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The availability of manpower is one of the important prerequisites for the efficient functioning of the Rural Health services. As on 31st March, 2020, the overall shortfall (which excludes the existing surplus in some of the states) in the posts of Health Worker (Female) / ANM was 2 percent of the total requirement as per the norm of one HW(F)/ ANM per Sub Centre and PHC. The overall shortfall was mainly due to the shortfall in states of Gujarat (1073), Himachal Pradesh (992), Rajasthan (657), Tripura (389) and Kerala (277). Similarly, in case of Health Worker (Male), there was a shortfall of 65.5 percent of the requirement.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; PHC is the first contact point between the village community and the Medical Officer. Manpower in PHC includes a Medical Officer supported by paramedical and other staff. In the case of PHC, for Health Assistant (male + female), the shortfall was 71.9 percent. For allopathic doctors at PHC, there was a shortfall of 6.8 percent of the total requirement at all India level. This shortfall happened due to a significant shortfall of doctors at PHCs in the states of Odisha (461), Chhattisgarh (404), Rajasthan (249), Madhya Pradesh (134), Uttar Pradesh (121) and Karnataka (105).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The Community Health Centres provide specialised medical care of Surgeons, Obstetricians &amp; Gynecologists, Physicians and Pediatricians. The latest available position of specialists manpower at CHCs as on 31st March, 2020 shows that out of the sanctioned posts, 68.4 percent of Surgeons, 56.1 percent of Obstetricians &amp; Gynecologists, 66.8 percent of physicians and 63.1 percent of pediatricians were vacant. Overall 63.3 percent of the sanctioned posts of specialists at CHCs were vacant. Moreover, as compared to requirements for existing infrastructure, there was a shortfall of 78.9 percent of Surgeons, 69.7 percent of Obstetricians &amp; Gynecologists, 78.2 percent of Physicians and 78.2 percent of Pediatricians. Overall, there was a shortfall of 76.1 percent of specialists at the CHCs as compared to the requirement for existing CHCs. The shortfall of specialists was significantly high in most of the states. However, in addition to the specialists, about 15,342 General Duty Medical Officers (GDMOs) Allopathic and 702 AYUSH Specialists along with 2,720 GDMO AYUSH were also available at CHCs as on 31st March, 2020. In addition to this, there were 890 Anaesthetists and 301 Eye Surgeons available at CHCs as on 31st March, 2020.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Comparison of the manpower position of major categories in 2020 with that in 2019 shows an overall decrease in the number of ANMs at SCs &amp; PHCs and Doctors at PHCs during the period. However, there was an increase in the number of Specialists at CHCs. The number of Specialists at CHCs had increased from 3,881 in 2019 to 4,857 in 2020, which was an increase of 27.7 percent.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Considering the status of paramedical staff, there was an increase of Lab Technicians from 18,715 in 2019 to 19,903 in 2020 at PHCs and CHCs. There was a marginal decrease in the number of pharmacists from 26,204 in 2019 to 25,792 in 2020. A significant decrease was also observed in nursing staff under PHC &amp; CHCs from 80,976 in 2019 to 71,847 in 2020. The number of radiographers had increased marginally from 2,419 in 2019 to 2,434 in 2020.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; A total of 1,193 Sub Divisional/ Sub District Hospitals were functioning as on 31st March, 2020 throughout the country. In these hospitals, 13,399 doctors were available. In addition to these doctors, about 29,937 paramedical staff were also available at those hospitals as on 31st March, 2020. The number of doctors in Sub Divisional/ Sub District Hospitals had reduced from 13,750 in 2019 to 13,399 in 2020. The number of paramedical staff in Sub Divisional/ Sub District Hospitals fell from 36,909 in 2019 to 29,937 in 2020.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In addition to above, 810 District Hospitals (DHs) were also functioning as on 31st March, 2020 throughout the country. There were 22,827 doctors available in the DHs. In addition to the doctors, about 80,920 paramedical staff were also available at District Hospitals as on 31st March, 2020. The number of doctors in District Hospitals went down from 24,676 in 2019 to 22,827 in 2020. The number of paramedical staff in District Hospitals fell from 85,194 in 2019 to 80,920 in 2020.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; As per the Health &amp; Wellness Centre (HWC) portal data, there were a total of 38,595 HWCs functional in India as on 31st March 2020. In total, 18,610 SCs had been converted into HWC-SCs. Also at the level of PHC, a total of 19,985 PHCs had been converted into HWC-PHCs. Out of 19,985 HWC-PHCs, 16,635 PHCs had been converted into HWCs in rural areas and 3,350 in urban areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">**page**</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">Kindly <a href="/upload/files/LASI_India_Factsheet.pdf">click here</a> to access the [inside]India Fact Sheet of Longitudinal Ageing Study in India (LASI) -- Wave-1 (released in 2021)[/inside], An Investigation of Health, Economic, and Social Well-being of India&rsquo;s Growing Elderly Population, India Report 2020, prepared by International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), National Programme for Health Care Elderly (NPHCE), Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health (HSPH), University&nbsp; of Southern California (USC) and Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MoHFW).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="/upload/files/LASI_India_Executive_Summary.pdf">click here</a> to read the [inside]Executive Summary of Longitudinal Ageing Study in India (LASI) -- Wave-1 (released in 2021)[/inside].</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>---</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to the report entitled [inside]A Neglected Tragedy: The global burden of stillbirths -- Report of the UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation, 2020 (released in October 2020)[/inside] (please click <a href="https://www.im4change.org/upload/files/UN-IGME-the-global-burden-of-stillbirths-2020.pdf">here</a> to access):</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; About one stillbirth occurs every 16 seconds, which means that every year, about 2 million babies are stillborn i.e. showing no signs of life at birth. It means every day, almost 5,400 babies are stillborn. Globally, one in 72 babies is stillborn.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In the past two decades, 48 million babies were stillborn. Three-in-four stillbirths occur in sub-Saharan Africa or Southern Asia. Low and lower-middle income countries account for 84 percent of all stillbirths but only 62 percent of all live births.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Stillbirths are largely absent in worldwide data tracking, rendering the true extent of the problem hidden. They are invisible in policies and programmes and underfinanced as an area requiring intervention. Targets specific to stillbirths were absent from the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and are still missing in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; There are a variety of reasons behind the slow reduction in stillbirth rates: absence of or poor quality of care during pregnancy and birth; lack of investment in preventative interventions and the health workforce; inadequate social recognition of stillbirths as a burden on families; measurement challenges and major data gaps; absence of global and national leadership; and no established global targets, such as the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Globally, an estimated 42 percent of all stillbirths are intrapartum (i.e., the baby died during labour); almost all of these 832,000 stillborn deaths that occurred in 2019 could have been prevented with access to high-quality care during childbirth, including ongoing intrapartum monitoring and timely intervention in case of complications.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Around 20 million babies are projected to be stillborn in the next decade, if trends observed between 2000 and 2019 in reducing the stillbirth rate continue. Among the 20 million, 2.9 million stillbirths could be prevented by accelerating progress to meet the ENAP target in the 56 countries at risk to miss the goal. Every Newborn Action Plan (ENAP) calls for each country to achieve a rate of 12 stillbirths or fewer per 1,000 total births by 2030 and to close equity gaps.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In the first two decades of this century (i.e. 2000-2019), the annual rate of reduction (ARR) in the stillbirth rate was just -2.3 percent, compared to a -2.9 percent reduction in neonatal mortality and -4.3 percent among children aged 1&ndash;59 months. Meanwhile, between 2000 and 2017, maternal mortality decreased by -2.9 percent.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In the year 2000, the ratio of the number of stillbirths to the number of under-five deaths was 0.30; by 2019, it had increased to 0.38. So, stillbirths are an increasingly critical global health problem.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; National stillbirth rates around the globe ranged from 1.4 to 32.2 stillbirths per 1,000 total births in 2019. Sub-Saharan Africa, followed by Southern Asia, had the highest stillbirth rate and the greatest number of stillbirths.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Six countries bore the burden of half of all stillbirths of the world &ndash; India, Pakistan, Nigeria, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, China and Ethiopia, in order of burden (highest to lowest).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Nearly 3,40,622 of the 19,66,000&nbsp; stillbirths globally in 2019 were in India, making it the country with the largest such burden (i.e. 17.33 percent).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2019, India, Pakistan and Nigeria alone accounted for one-third of the total burden of stillbirths and 27 percent of live births.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Stillbirth rate is defined as the ratio of the number of still births per 1,000 live births and stillbirths taken together (i.e. total births).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Some progress has been made in preventing stillbirths. Globally, the stillbirth rate declined by 35 percent since 2000. Since 2000, the stillbirth rate declined by 44 percent in Central and Southern Asia, 53 percent in India, 52 percent in Kazakhstan and 44 percent in Nepal.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Among the lower-middle income countries, stillbirth rate fell by 39 percent since 2000. Since the year 2000, stillbirth rate in lower-middle income countries like Mongolia, India and El Salvador declined by 57 percent, 53 percent and 50 percent, respectively.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; A total of 14 countries &ndash; including three low- and lower middle income countries (Cambodia, India, Mongolia) &ndash; slashed the stillbirth rate by more than half during 2000-2019.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The top 15 countries with the greatest percentage decline in the stillbirth rate during 2000&ndash;2019 are China (63 percent), Turkey (63 percent), Georgia (62 percent), North Macedonia (62 percent), Belarus (60 percent), Mongolia (57 percent), Netherlands (55 percent), Azerbaijan (53 percent), Estonia (53 percent), India (53 percent), Kazakhstan (52 percent), Romania (52 percent), El Salvador (50 percent), Peru (48 percent) and Latvia (46 percent).<br /> &nbsp;<br /> &bull; India&#39;s stillbirth rate (i.e. (stillbirths per 1,000 total births) in 2000 was 29.6, in 2010 was 20.2 and in 2019 was 13.9. The percentage decline in India&#39;s stillbirth rate during 2000&ndash;2019 was -53.0 percent. The annual rate of reduction (ARR) in stillbirth rate during 2000-2019 was -4.0 percent.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The total number of stillbirths in India was 852,386 in 2000, 535,683 in 2010 and 340,622 in 2019. The percentage decline in stillbirths during 2000&ndash;2019 was -60.0 percent. The annual rate of reduction (ARR) in total number of stillbirths during 2000&ndash;2019 was -4.8 percent. India witnessed 24,116,000 livebirths and 24,457,000 total births in 2019. &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Women in sub-Saharan Africa and Southern Asia bear the greatest burden of stillbirths in the world. More than three quarters of estimated stillbirths in 2019 occurred in these two regions, with 42 percent of the global total in sub-Saharan Africa and 34 percent in Southern Asia.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2019, stillbirth rate per 1,000 total births in Afghanistan was 28.4 (total stillbirth in 2019: 35,384), Bangladesh was 24.3 (total stillbirth in 2019: 72,508), Bhutan was 9.7 (total stillbirth in 2019: 127), China was 5.5 (total stillbirth in 2019: 92,170), India was 13.9 (total stillbirth in 2019: 340,622), Maldives was 5.8 (total stillbirth in 2019: 41), Myanmar was 14.1 (total stillbirth in 2019: 13,493), Nepal was 17.5 (total stillbirth in 2019: 9,997), Pakistan was 30.6 (total stillbirth in 2019: 190,483) and Sri Lanka was 5.8 (total stillbirth in 2019: 1,943).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Data are essential to understanding the burden of stillbirths and identifying where, when and why they occur.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Immediate actions are needed to strengthen data systems and their ability to collect, analyses and use timely, quality and disaggregated stillbirth data. To improve stillbirth data availability and quality, it is recommended that countries and relevant stakeholders:</p> <p style="text-align:justify">a. Align the stillbirth definition and measures with international standards<br /> b.&nbsp; Integrate stillbirth-specific components within relevant plans for data system strengthening and improvement<br /> c. Record stillbirth outcomes in all relevant maternal and newborn health programs, including routine HMIS (registers and monthly reporting forms)<br /> d. Provide training and support to include stillbirths within civil and vital registration systems as the coverage of these systems increases<br /> e. Include information on timing of stillbirth (antepartum or intrapartum) in all settings and record causes and contributing factors to stillbirth where possible<br /> f. Report and review stillbirth data locally &ndash; at facility or district level &ndash; alongside data on neonatal deaths (by day of death) to reduce incentives for misreporting of outcomes, and to monitor potential misclassification.<br /> g. Collate reported stillbirth rate data up the data system to a national level to enable tracking of progress towards the ENAP target of 12 stillbirths or fewer per 1,000 total births in every country by 2030 and to enable monitoring of geographical inequities.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Ending preventable stillbirths is among the core goals of the UN&rsquo;s Global Strategy for Women&rsquo;s, Children&rsquo;s and Adolescents&rsquo; Health (2016&ndash;2030) and the Every Newborn Action Plan (ENAP). These global initiatives aim to reduce the stillbirth rate to 12 or fewer third trimester (late) stillbirths per 1,000 total births in every country by 2030.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The stillbirth rate (SBR) is defined as the number of babies born with no signs of life at 28 weeks or more of gestation, per 1,000 total births. The stillbirth rate is calculated as: SBR = 1000 * {sb/(sb+lb)}, where &#39;sb&#39; refers to the number of stillbirths &ge; 28 weeks or more of gestational age; and &#39;lb&#39; refers to the number of live births regardless of gestational age or birthweight.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> <strong><em>[Shivangini Piplani, who is doing her MA in Finance and Investment (1st year) from Berlin School of Business and Innovation, assisted the Inclusive Media for Change team in preparing the summary of &#39;A Neglected Tragedy: The global burden of stillbirths -- Report of the UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation, 2020.&#39; She did this work as part of her winter internship at the Inclusive Media for Change project in December 2020.]</em></strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> The Sample Registration System (SRS) is carried out by the Office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner, India with the goal of providing accurate annual estimates of birth rates, death rates, child mortality rates and many other indices of pregnancy and fertility and mortality. The SRS has been providing data for the estimation of various mortality measures since its inception. The report provides mortality indices at the national and state levels, as well as death rates at the sub-state, viz. NSS Natural Division Level. &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The key findings of [inside]Sample Registration System Statistical Report 2018 (released in June 2020)[/inside], published by the Office of the Registrar General &amp; Census Commissioner, are as follows (please <a href="/upload/files/SRS_Statistical_Report_2018.pdf"><span style="background-color:#ffffff">click here</span></a> to access):</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Crude Death Rate (CDR)</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Crude Death Rate (CDR), which is defined as the number of deaths in a year per thousand population, at the national level, stood at 6.2 in 2018. It was 6.7 in rural areas and 5.1 in urban areas. For all bigger states/ UTs, except West Bengal, the CDR in rural areas was higher than that in urban areas. For West Bengal, CDR in rural (CDR 5.6) and urban (CDR 5.7) areas were almost identical, which makes the state the closest to the Line of Equity vis-&agrave;-vis other states/ UTs.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; States that exhibited large differences between urban CDR and rural CDR in 2018 were: Telangana (3 points), Punjab (2.6), Tamil Nadu (2.5), Andhra Pradesh (2.4), Karnataka (2.4), Chhattisgarh (2.3 points) and Himachal Pradesh (2.3). The difference is calculated as Rural CDR - Urban CDR = Difference in CDRs.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The top 5 states with the highest CDRs in 2018 were: Chhattisgarh (8.0), Odisha (7.3), Kerala (6.9), Himachal Pradesh (6.9) and Andhra Pradesh (6.7).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Between the periods 2006-08 and 2016-18, the average CDR at the national level changed by &ndash;14.9 percentage points. Between the above-said time points, CDR declined for all states, except Kerala, which showed an increase of 6 percentage points possibly due to the changes in age structure of its population.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Infant Mortality Rate (IMR)</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Infant Mortality Rate (IMR) is defined as the number of infant (less than one year of age) deaths per one thousand live births during the year.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; IMR has seen a substantial decline over the years, from 129 per 1000 live births in 1971 to 110 in 1981 and from 80 in 1991 to 32 in 2018.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; At the national level, IMR was 36.8 in rural areas and 22.9 in urban areas during the period 2016-18. However, IMR was 36 in rural areas and 23 in urban areas in 2018.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2018, Kerala had the lowest IMR of 7 and Madhya Pradesh had the highest IMR of 48.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2018, at the national level, IMR among male infants stood at 32, while that for female infants it was 33.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; For the year 2018, in all states except Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Delhi, Gujarat, Haryana, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Odisha, Punjab, Tamil Nadu, Telangana and Uttarakhand, female infants experienced a higher mortality rate as compared to male infants.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2018, Jharkhand had the highest difference between male IMR (27) and female IMR (34), followed by Bihar with a large difference between male IMR (30) and female IMR (35). As opposed to that, in Madhya Pradesh male IMR (51) exceeded female IMR (46).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2018, Assam witnessed the highest inequity between rural and urban IMRs with its rural IMR at 44 and urban IMR at 20. States like West Bengal (Urban IMR 20, Rural IMR 22), Punjab (Urban IMR 19, Rural IMR 21), Uttarakhand (Urban IMR 29, Rural IMR 31) and Bihar (Urban IMR 30, Rural IMR 32) had the least inequity between rural and urban IMR.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Between 2006-08 and 2016-18, the average IMR declined by -40.3 percent. In rural areas, decline in IMR between the above-said time points ranged from -63.9 percentage points in Delhi to -32.2 percentage points in Chhattisgarh. The highest fall in IMR in urban areas between the above-said time points was noticed in Delhi i.e. -56.4 percent.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Neonatal Mortality Rate</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Neo-natal Mortality Rate (NMR) is defined as the number of infant (less than 29 days) deaths per one thousand live births during the year.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2018, at the national level, NMR was 23, while in rural and urban areas, they were 27 and 14, respectively.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2018, NMR was the lowest in Kerala at 5 and highest in Madhya Pradesh at 35.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; At the national level, the percentage of neo-natal deaths to total infant deaths was 71.7 percent in 2018, and it was 60.1 percent in urban areas and 74.4 percent in rural areas. It means that most infants die when they are not even 30 days old.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Perinatal Mortality Rate</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Peri-natal mortality rate (PMR) is defined as the number of still births and infant deaths of less than 7 days per 1,000 live births (LB) and still births (SB) taken together during the year.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; At the national level, PMR has been estimated to be 22 in 2018. It was 25 in rural areas and 14 in urban areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2018, Madhya Pradesh had the highest PMR at 30 and Kerala had the lowest PMR at 10.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Still Birth Rate</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Still Birth Rate (SBR) is defined as the ratio of the number of still births per one thousand live births and still births taken together.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; At the national level, the SBR has been estimated to be 4 in 2018.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2018, the highest SBR has been estimated for Odisha (10) and lowest have been estimated for Jammu and Kashmir and Jharkhand (i.e. 1 each).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Under-five Mortality Rate (U5MR)</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Under-five Mortality Rate (U5MR) is the probability of dying between birth and exactly age 5, expressed per 1,000 live births.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; At the national level, U5MR has been estimated to be 36 in 2018. In urban areas, the U5MR in 2018 has been estimated to be 26 while in rural areas, it has been estimated to be 40.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Estimated U5MR was the lowest in Kerala at 10 and was the highest in Madhya Pradesh at 56.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; At the national level, female U5MR (37) was higher than the male U5MR (36) in 2018.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2018, female U5MRs were higher than that of male U5MR in all states except in Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Delhi, Gujarat, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Odisha, Punjab, Tamil Nadu and Uttarakhand.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Age-Specific Mortality Rates (ASMR)</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Age-specific Mortality Rate (ASMR), is defined as the number of deaths in a particular age-group per thousand population of the same age-group during the year.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong><em>5-14 Age Group</em></strong><br /> &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;<br /> &bull; At the national level, the ASDR for the 5-14 age group has been estimated to be 0.5 in 2018.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2018, the lowest ASDR for the 5-14 age group was found for Kerala and Assam (0.2 each) and the highest ASDR for the 5-14 age group was observed in case of Bihar, Odisha, Madhya and Chhattisgarh (0.7 each).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; At the national level, although ASDR for the 5-14 age group was the same for males and females in urban areas (0.4 each), ASDR for the 5-14 age group among females was 0.6 and among males was 0.5 in rural areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong><em>15-59 Age Group</em></strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; At the national level, ASDR for the 15-59 age group has been estimated to be 3.2 in rural areas and 2.3 in urban areas. At the national level, the ASDR for the 15-59 age group was 2.9 in 2018.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2018, the female ASDR for the 15-59 age group was lower than that of male ASDR for the 15-59 age group in all the states.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong><em>60 and Above Age Group</em></strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; At the national level, ASDR for the 60 and above age group has been estimated to be 42.6.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; ASDR for the 60 and above age group among males (45.9) was greater than that among females (39.5). The same trend existed for rural and urban areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; ASDR for the 60 and above age group has been estimated to be the highest in Chhattisgarh (58.9) and lowest in Delhi (28.3).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Sex Ratio at Birth (SRB)</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Sex Ratio at Birth (SRB) is defined as the number of female births per 1000 male births during the year.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The 3 years&rsquo; average of SRB (in the period 2016-18) has been estimated to be 899. At the national level, it was 900 in rural areas and 897 in urban areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; For 2016-18, the average SRB was the highest in Chhattisgarh at 958 and it was the lowest in Uttarakhand at 840.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In rural areas, Chhattisgarh had the highest SRB of 976 and Haryana had the lowest SRB of 840 in the period 2016-18. &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In urban areas, Madhya Pradesh had the highest SRB of 968 and Uttarakhand had the lowest SRB at 810 in the period 2016-18.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong><em>[Meghana Myadam and Sakhi Arun Jagdale, who are doing their MA in Development Studies (1st year) from Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Hyderabad, assisted the Inclusive Media for Change team in preparing the summary of the report by the Office of the Registrar General &amp; Census Commissioner<em>.</em> They did this work as part of their summer internship at the Inclusive Media for Change project in July 2020.]</em></strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="/upload/files/FAQ.pdf">click here</a> to access the [inside]FAQ on COVID-19 prepared by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare[/inside].</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="/upload/files/Containment%20Plan%20for%20Large%20Outbreaks%20of%20COVID19%20Final.pdf">click here</a> to access the [inside]Containment Plan for Large Outbreaks Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019[/inside] (COVID-19), which has been prepared by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">---</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/Background-Paper-COVID19.pdf">click here</a> to read the [inside]Background Note on COVID-19[/inside], which was prepared by Jan Swasthya Abhiyan (JSA) and All India People&rsquo;s Science Network(AIPSN), dated 16th March, 2020.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/Statement-COVID19.pdf">click here</a> to read the [inside]Statement on the COVID-19 pandemic[/inside], which was released by Jan Swasthya Abhiyan (JSA) and All India People&rsquo;s Science Network(AIPSN) on 16th March, 2020.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">---</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/High%20Level%20group%20of%20Health%20Sector.pdf" title="High Level group of Health Sector">click here</a> to access the Report of the [inside]High Level Group on Health Sector (2019), submitted to the Fifteenth Finance Commission of India[/inside]. The members of the High Level Group on Health were Dr. Randeep Guleria, Dr. Devi Shetty, Dr. Dileep Govind Mhaisekar, Dr. Naresh Trehan, Dr. Bhabatosh Biswas and Prof. K Srinath Reddy.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">---</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Press%20Note%20NSS%2075th%20Round%20Report%20Key%20Indicators%20of%20Social%20Consumption%20in%20India%20Health%20July%202017%20to%20June%202018%20released%20on%2023rd%20November%202019.pdf" title="Press Note NSS 75th Round Report Key Indicators of Social Consumption in India Health July 2017 to June 2018 released on 23rd November 2019">click here</a> to access the major findings of [inside]NSS 75th Round Report: Key Indicators of Social Consumption in India: Health, July 2017 to June 2018 (released on 23rd November 2019)[/inside].<br /> <br /> Kindly <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Key%20Indicators%20of%20Social%20Consumption%20in%20India%20Health.pdf" title="Key Indicators of Social Consumption in India Health">click here</a> to access the NSS 75th Round Report: Key Indicators of Social Consumption in India: Health, July 2017 to June 2018 (released on 23rd November 2019).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <div style="text-align:justify">The key findings of the [inside]2019 India TB report (released in September 2019)[/inside], which has been produced by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, are as follows (please <a href="https://tbcindia.gov.in/WriteReadData/India%20TB%20Report%202019.pdf">click here</a> and <a href="https://tbcindia.gov.in/index1.php?lang=1&amp;level=1&amp;sublinkid=4160&amp;lid=2807">click here</a> to access):</div> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> &bull; The country accounted for a quarter of the global tuberculosis (TB) burden with an estimated 27 lakh cases in 2018.<br /> <br /> &bull; In 2018, the country was able to achieve a total notification of 21.5 lakh TB cases, of which 25 percent was from private sector. Majority of the TB burden is among the working age group. Nearly 89 percent of TB cases came from the age group 15-69 years. About two-third of the TB patients were males.<br /> <br /> &bull; Among the notified, treatment was initiated for about 19.1 lakh cases (almost 90 percent), across both public and private sectors.<br /> <br /> &bull; HIV co-infection among TB patient was nearly fifty thousand cases amounting to TB-HIV co-infection rate of 3.4 percent.<br /> <br /> &bull; In 2018, TB notification has increased to 5.37 lakhs. This is an increase by 35 percent in notification from private sector in comparison to 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; Based on private drug sales data, it could be said that in 2016 there was about 1.59 times patients in the private sector as compared to the public sector (approximately 22.7 lakh patients in total).<br /> <br /> &bull; In India about 80 percent of the outpatient care is provided by private health care providers. Considering the quantum of private sector, it necessitates to leverage their capacity to expand health coverage.<br /> <br /> &bull; TB is a notifiable disease vide 2012 as per declaration of Government of India Order. This has expanded the ambit of TB surveillance covering all public as well as private health facilities. The healthcare providers shall notify every TB cases to local authorities such as District Health Officers/ Chief Medical Officers of a district and Municipal Health Officer of a municipal corporation. This notification should be done every month. The surveillance begins with the notification, and completed with acting on the information gathered. In <a href="tinymce/uploaded/TB%20notification%20Gazette%20of%20India%20dated%2019%20March%202018.pdf" title="TB notification Gazette of India dated 19 March 2018">March 2018</a>, the notification was published in Gazette of India, making it mandatory for private providers to notify TB patients and public health system to act upon it.<br /> <br /> &bull; Uttar Pradesh, with 17 percent of population of the country, is the largest contributor to TB cases, with 20 percent of the total notifications, accounting for about 4.2 lakh cases (187 cases per lakh population).<br /> <br /> &bull; Delhi and Chandigarh stand apart from all other states and UTs with regard to notification rates relative to their resident population. Annual notification rates in Delhi and Chandigarh were 504 cases per lakh population and 496 cases per lakh population, respectively. This is because patients residing in other parts of the country are diagnosed/ notified from these two UTs.<br /> <br /> &bull; In 2018, the Revised National Tuberculosis Control Programme (RNTCP) notified 21.5 lakh TB cases, a 16 percent increase over 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; The largest ever National Drug Resistance Survey in the world for 13 anti-TB drugs has been completed and it has indicated about 6.2 percent prevalence of drug resistant TB in the country among all TB patients.<br /> <br /> &bull; The Government of India is prioritising resource allocations for TB in the country with more than Rs. 12,000 crores being invested in the implementation of the National Strategic Plan to End TB 2017-2025. The government has started the Nikshay Poshan Yojana (NPY) for nutritional support to TB patients.&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; It is expected that the country would be able to cover all TB cases through the online notification system -- NIKSHAY.<br /> &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The ending preventable maternal mortality (EPMM) target for reducing the global maternal mortality ratio (MMRatio) by 2030 was adopted as Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) target 3.1: reduce global MMRatio to less than 70 per lakh live births by 2030. Having targets for mortality reduction is important, but accurate measurement of maternal mortality remains challenging and many deaths still go uncounted. Many countries still lack well-functioning civil registration and vital statistics (CRVS) systems, and where such systems do exist, reporting errors &ndash; whether incompleteness (unregistered deaths, also known as &ldquo;missing&rdquo;) or misclassification of cause of death &ndash; continue to pose a major challenge to data accuracy. The report entitled &#39;Trends in Maternal Mortality 2000 to 2017: Estimates by World Health Orgnization (WHO), United Nations Children&#39;s Fund (UNICEF), World Bank Group, United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) and the United Nations Population Division presents internationally comparable global, regional and country-level estimates and trends for maternal mortality between 2000 and 2017.<br /> <br /> The new estimates presented in this report supersede all previously published estimates for years that fall within the same time period. Care should be taken to use only these estimates for the interpretation of trends in maternal mortality from 2000 to 2017; due to modifications in methodology and data availability, differences between these and previous estimates should not be interpreted as representing time trends. In addition, when interpreting changes in MMRatios over time, one should take into consideration that it is easier to reduce the MMRatio when the level is high than when the MMRatio level is already low.<br /> <br /> Please note that Maternal Mortality Ratio is the number of women who die&nbsp; from pregnancy-related causes while pregnant or within 42 days of pregnancy termination per 100,000 live births.<br /> <br /> The key findings of the report entitled [inside]Trends in Maternal Mortality 2000 to 2017: Estimates by WHO, UNICEF, World Bank Group, UNFPA and the United Nations Population Division (released in September 2019)[/inside] are as follows (please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Maternal%20mortality%20Levels%20and%20trends%202000%20to%202017%20Executive%20Summary.pdf" title="Maternal mortality Levels and trends 2000 to 2017 Executive Summary">click here</a> and <a href="https://www.unfpa.org/featured-publication/trends-maternal-mortality-2000-2017">click here</a> to access):&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; Nigeria and India had the highest estimated numbers of maternal deaths, accounting for approximately one-third (35 percent) of estimated&nbsp; global maternal deaths in 2017, with approximately 67,000 and 35,000 maternal deaths (23 percent and 12 percent of global maternal deaths), respectively.<br /> <br /> &bull; Maternal Mortality Ratio for India was 370 in 2000, 286 in 2005, 210 in&nbsp; 2010, 158 in 2015 and 145 in 2017. So, the MMRatio for the country reduced by almost 61 percent between 2000 and 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; MMRatio for China was 59 in 2000, 44 in 2005, 36 in 2010, 30 in 2015 and 29 in 2017. Hence, the MMRatio for China reduced by around 51 percent between 2000 and 2017.&nbsp;&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; The absolute difference in MMRatio between India and China has lessened from 311 in 2000 to 116 in 2017. The country&#39;s MMRatio&nbsp; was 6.3 times that of China in 2000, which has reduced to 5 times in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; MMRatio for Bangladesh was 434 in 2000, 343 in 2005, 258 in 2010, 200 in 2015 and 173 in 2017. Therefore, the MMRatio for Bangladesh decreased by nearly 60 percent between 2000 and 2017.&nbsp;&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; The absolute gap in MMRatio between Bangladesh and India has reduced from 64 in 2000 to 28 in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; MMRatio for Sri Lanka was 56 in 2000, 45 in 2005, 38 in 2010, 36 in 2015 and 36 in 2017. So, the MMRatio for Sri Lanka reduced by roughly 36 percent between 2000 and 2017.&nbsp;&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; MMRatio for Pakistan was 286 in 2000, 237 in 2005, 191 in 2010, 154 in 2015 and 140 in 2017. Therefore, the MMRatio for Pakistan declined by roughly 51 percent between 2000 and 2017.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; MMRatio for South Asia was 395 in 2000, 309 in 2005, 235 in 2010, 179 in 2015 and 163 in 2017. Hence, the MMRatio for South Asia reduced by around 59 percent between 2000 and 2017.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Sub-Saharan Africa and Southern Asia accounted for approximately 86 percent (2,54,000) of the estimated global maternal deaths in 2017 with sub-Saharan Africa alone accounting for roughly 66 percent (1,96,000), while Southern Asia accounted for nearly 20 percent (58,000). South-Eastern Asia, in addition, accounted for over 5 percent of global maternal deaths (16,000).<br /> &nbsp;&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to the [inside]National Health Profile 2018, 13th Issue[/inside], Central Bureau of Health Intelligence, Ministry of Health &amp; Family Welfare (please <a href="https://im4change.org/docs/900National%20Health%20Profile%202018%2013th%20Issue%20Central%20Bureau%20of%20Health%20Intelligence%20Ministry%20of%20Health%20&amp;%20Family%20Welfare.pdf">click here</a> to access):<br /> <br /> <strong>Demographic Indicators</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; The Infant Mortality Rate (IMR) per 1,000 live births has declined considerably from 74 infant deaths in 1994 to 34 infant deaths in 2016. There is a huge gap between IMR in rural areas (38 infant deaths per 1,000 live births) and urban areas (23 infant deaths per 1000 live births).<br /> <br /> &bull; Among the states, the lowest IMR per 1,000 live births in 2016 was found in Goa (8), followed by Kerala (10) and Manipur (11). The highest IMR per 1,000 live births in 2015 was found in Madhya Pradesh (47), followed by both Assam and Odisha (44 each).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The life expectancy of life at birth has increased from 49.7 years in 1970-75 to 68.3 years in 2011-15. In the period 2011-15, the life expectancy for females was 70.0 years and 66.9 years for males.<br /> <br /> &bull; In the period 2011-15, the life expectancy in the rural areas was 67.1 years and in the urban areas it was 71.9 years.<br /> <br /> &bull; The Maternal Mortality Ratio (MMRatio) per 1,00,000 livebirths has decreased from 178 maternal deaths during 2010-12 to 167 maternal deaths during 2011-13. In 2011-13, the MMRatio per 1,00,000 livebirths was the highest in Assam i.e. 300 maternal deaths and lowest in Kerala i.e. 61 maternal deaths.<br /> <br /> &bull; The country&#39;s birth rate per 1,000 estimated mid-year population has fallen from 29.5 livebirths in 1991 to 20.4 livebirths in 2016. Birth rate per 1,000 estimated mid-year population in rural areas was 22.1 livebirths and in urban areas it was 17.0 livebirths in 2016.<br /> <br /> &bull; India&#39;s natural growth rate per 1,000 mid-year population has declined from 19.7 in 1991 to 14.0 in 2016.<br /> <br /> &bull; The proportion of urban population to India&#39;s total population has increased from 25.7 percent in 1991 to 27.81 percent in 2001, and further increased to 31.14 in 2011.<br /> <br /> &bull; The country&#39;s population density has increased from 267 persons per square kilometer in 1991 to 325 persons per square kilometer in 2001, and further rose to 382 persons per square kilometer in 2011.<br /> <br /> &bull; The decadal growth rate of India&#39;s population has fallen from 23.87 percent in 1981-1991 to 21.54 percent in 1991-2001, and further declined to 17.7 percent in 2001-2011.<br /> <br /> <strong>Health Status Indicators</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; In 2017, maximum number of malaria cases was reported in Odisha (3,52,140 cases) and maximum number of deaths was reported in West Bengal (29 deaths).<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of cases of malaria has changed from 8,81,730 in 2013 to 8,42,095 in 2017. The total number of deaths due to malaria has changed from 440 in 2013 to 104 in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; Out of the overall cases of Kala-azar reported in 2017, 72 percent of the cases were reported in Bihar. The total number of cases of Kala-azar has fallen from 13,869 in 2013 to 5,758 in 2017. Likewise, the total number of deaths from Kala-azar has fallen from 20 in 2013 to zero in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; There has been a considerable fall in the number of swine flu cases/ deaths in the year 2014 (viz. 937) as compared with 2012 (viz. 5,044) &amp; 2013 (viz. 5,253). However, the number of cases (42,592) and deaths (2,990) have drastically increased in the year 2015. In 2016, the cases decreased to 1786 and again increased to 38,811 in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; A total of 63,679 cases of chikungunya were reported in 2017 as compared with 64,057 cases in 2016. Most chikungunya cases in 2017 were reported from Karnataka (32,170), followed by Gujarat (7,807) and Maharashtra (7,639).<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of cases and deaths due to chicken pox were 74,035 and 92, respectively in 2017. Kerala accounted for maximum number of cases (30,941) and West Bengal accounted for maximum number of deaths (53) due to chicken pox in 2017.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of cases of Acute Encephalitis Syndrome has increased from 7,825 in 2013 to 13,036 in 2017. The total number of deaths due to Acute Encephalitis Syndrome has decreased from 1,273 in 2013 to 1,010 in 2017. Uttar Pradesh reported maximum numbers of cases (4,749) and maximum number of deaths (593) in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of cases of Japanese Encephalitis has almost doubled from 1,086 in 2013 to 2,180 in 2017. The total number of deaths due to Japanese Encephalitis has increased from 202 in 2013 to 252 in 2017. Uttar Pradesh reported maximum numbers of cases (693) and maximum number of deaths (93) in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of cases and deaths due to encephalitis were 12,485 and 626, respectively in 2017. Assam accounted for maximum number of cases (5,525) and Uttar Pradesh accounted for maximum number of deaths (246) due to chicken pox in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of cases and deaths due to viral meningitis were 7,559 and 121, respectively in 2017. Andhra Pradesh accounted for maximum number of cases (1,493) and maximum number of deaths (33) due to viral meningitis in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of cases of dengue has almost doubled from 75,808 in 2013 to 1,57,996 in 2017. The total number of deaths due to dengue has increased from 193 in 2013 to 253 in 2017. Tamil Nadu reported maximum numbers of cases (23,294) and maximum number of deaths (65) in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; As per the National Programme for Prevention and Control of Cancer, Diabetes, Cardiovascular Diseases and Stroke (NPCDCS), out of 3,57,23,660 patients who attended non-communicable disease (NCD) clinics in 2017, 8.41 percent people are diagnosed with diabetes, 10.22 percent are diagnosed with hypertension (high blood pressure), 0.37% are diagnosed with cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), 0.13 percent are diagnosed with stroke and 0.11 percent are diagnosed with common cancers (including oral, cervical and breast cancer).<br /> <br /> &bull; During the year 2015, the lives of 4,13,457 and 1,33,623 people are cut short as a result of accidental and suicide cases, respectively. Many more people suffer non-fatal injuries, with many incurring a disability as a result of their injury.<br /> <br /> &bull; Suicide rates are increasing significantly for young adults including male, female &amp; transgender in a wider population. The maximum number of suicide cases (44,593) is reported between the age-group 30-45 years.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of disabled persons in India is 26,814,994 as per the Census 2011.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of cases and deaths due to snake bite were 1,42,366 and 948 respectively in 2017.<br /> <br /> <strong>Health Financing in India</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; The total public expenditure on health for the year 2015-16 stood at Rs 1.4 lakh crores (actual).<br /> <br /> &bull; The per capita public expenditure (actual) on health in nominal terms has gone up from Rs. 621 in 2009-10 to Rs. 1,112 in 2015-16.<br /> <br /> &bull; Public expenditure on health (includes health sector expenditure by Centre and States/UTs) as a percentage of GDP was 1.02 percent in 2015-16. There is no significant change in public expenditure on health as a percentage of GDP since 2009-10.<br /> <br /> &bull; The Centre-State share in total public expenditure on health was 31:69 in 2015-16, which used to be 36:64 in 2009-10.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total public expenditure on health (excluding other Central Ministries) in 2015-16 was Rs. 1,40,054 crores, with Medical and Public Health comprising the major share (78.7 percent). The share of Family Welfare was 12.6 percent.<br /> <br /> &bull; Urban and rural health services constituted 71 percent of the public expenditure on medical and public health in 2015-16.<br /> <br /> &bull; The North-Eastern states had the highest (viz. Rs. 2,878 per capita) and Empowered Action Group (EAG) states (including Assam) had the lowest (viz. Rs. 871 per capita) average per capita public expenditure on health in 2015-16 (excluding UTs). For example, in Mizoram the per capita health expenditure was Rs. 5862 (actual) in 2015-16. However, in Bihar, the per capita health expenditure was Rs. 491 (actual) in 2015-16.<br /> <br /> &bull; The North-Eastern states had the highest public health expenditure as a percentage of Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP) in 2015-16 (2.76 percent). Public health expenditure as a percentage of GSDP stood at 1.36 percent for EAG states (including Assam) and 0.76 percent for major non-EAG states.<br /> <br /> &bull; Based on the Health Survey (71st round) conducted by National Sample Service Office (NSSO), the average medical expenditure incurred during stay at hospital between January, 2013 and June, 2014 was Rs. 14,935 for rural and Rs. 24,436 for urban India.<br /> <br /> &bull; The average total medical expenditure per child birth as in-patient over the last 365 days (survey conducted from January to June 2014) in a public hospital in rural areas was Rs. 1,587 and in urban areas is Rs. 2,117.<br /> <br /> &bull; Around 43 crore individuals were covered under any health insurance in the year 2016-17. This amounts to 34 percent of the total population of India. Almost 79 percent of them were covered by public insurance companies.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; Overall, 77 percent of all persons covered with insurance fall under Government-sponsored schemes.<br /> <br /> &bull; Public insurance companies had a higher share of coverage and premium for all types of health insurance policies, except family floater policies including individual policies.<br /> <br /> &bull; Compared to countries that have either Universal Health Coverage or moving towards it, India&rsquo;s per capita public spending on health is low.<br /> <br /> <strong>Human Resources in Health Sector</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; The number of registered allopathic doctors possessing recognized medical qualifications (under Indian Medical Council Act) and registered with state medical council for the years 2016 and 2017 were 25,282 and 17,982, respectively. Upto 2017, the total number of doctors possessing recognised medical qualifications (under the IMC Act) registered with the State Medical Councils/ Medical Council of India is 10,41,395.&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; In 2017, the average population served per government allopathic doctor was 11,082. The state having the highest average population served per government allopathic doctor in 2017 was Bihar (28,391), followed by Uttar Pradesh (19,962) and Jharkhand (18,518).&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; In 2017, the average population served per government dental surgeon was 1,76,004. The state having the highest average population served per government dental surgeon in 2017 was Chhattisgarh (25,87,900), followed by Maharashtra (14,83,150) and Uttar Pradesh (11,41,869).<br /> <br /> &bull; The number of dental surgeon registered with Central/ State Dental Councils of India has increased from 93,332 in 2008 to 2,51,207 as on 31st December, 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; Over the years with gaining popularity, there is a steady rise in total number of registered AYUSH doctors in India from 7,71,468 in 2016 to 7,73,668 in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; There was a total of 8,41,279 Auxilliary Nurse Midwives (ANMs) serving in the country as on 31st December, 2016.<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 31st December, 2016, the highest number of registered ANMs among the states were found in Andhra Pradesh (1,38,435), followed by Rajasthan (1,08,688) and Odisha (62,159).<br /> <br /> &bull; There are 19,80,536 Registered Nurses and Registered Midwives (RN &amp; RM) and 56,367 Lady Health Visitors (LHV) serving in the country as on 31st December, 2016.<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 31st December, 2016, the highest number of registered RN &amp; RM among the states were found in Tamil Nadu (2,62,718), followed by Kerala (2,46,161) and Andhra Pradesh (2,32,621).<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 13th November, 2017, the total number of registered pharmacists operating in the country is 9,07,132.<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 13th November, 2017, the highest number of registered pharmacists among the states were found in Maharashtra (2,03,089), followed by Gujarat (1,19,445) and Andhra Pradesh (1,15,754).<br /> <br /> &bull; In rural areas, the total number of allopathic doctors at primary health centres (PHCs) was 27,124 as on 31st March, 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 31st March, 2017, among the states, the highest number of allopathic doctors at PHCs was found in Maharashtra (2,929), followed by Tamil Nadu (2,759) and Rajasthan (2,382).<br /> <br /> &bull; In rural areas, the total number of specialists at community health centres (CHCs) is 4,156 as on 31st March, 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 31st March, 2017, among the states, the highest number of specialists at CHCs is found in Maharashtra (508), followed by Karnataka (498) and Rajasthan (497).<br /> <br /> <strong>Health Infrastructure</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; Medical education infrastructures in the country have shown rapid growth during the last 26 years. The country has 476 medical colleges, 313 dental colleges for Bachelor of Dental Surgery (BDS) &amp; 249 dental colleges for Master of Dental Surgery (MDS). There has been a total admission of 52,646 in 476 Medical Colleges and 27,060 in BDS and 6,233 in MDS during 2017-18.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of dental colleges for BDS has increased from 77 in 1994-95 to 313 in 2017-18 viz. by 4.1 times. The total number of dental colleges for MDS has increased from 32 in 1994-95 to 249 in 2017-18 viz. by 7.8 times.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of admission in dental colleges for BDS has risen from 1,987 in 1994-95 to 27,060 in 2017-18 viz. by 13.6 times. The total number of admission in dental colleges for MDS has risen from 225 in 1994-95 to 6,233 in 2017-18 viz. 27.7 times.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of medical colleges in India has increased from 146 in 1991-92 to 476 in 2017-18 viz. by 3.3 times.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of male students taking admissions in medical colleges has gone up from 7,468 in 1991-92 to 26,082 in 2017-18 viz. by 3.5 times. The total number of female students taking admissions in medical colleges has gone up from 4,731 in 1991-92 to 26,564 in 2017-18 viz. by 5.6 times.<br /> <br /> &bull; India has 3,215 institutions producing 1,29,926 General Nurse Midwives annually and 777 colleges for Pharmacy (Diploma) with an intake capacity of 46,795 as on 31st October, 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; There are 23,582 government hospitals having 7,10,761 beds in the country. It means that there is just one bed for 1,826 Indians in government hospitals, assuming that the projected population in 2018 being 129,80,41,000 as on 1st March, 2018.<br /> <br /> &bull; Around 19,810 government hospitals are in rural areas with 2,79,588 beds and 3,772 government hospitals are in urban areas with 4,31,173 beds.<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 31st March, 2017, there were 1,56,231 sub-centres, 25,650 primary health centres (PHCs) and 5,624 community health centres (CHCs).<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 31st March, 2017, most sub-centres were found in Uttar Pradesh (20,521), followed by Rajasthan (14,406) and Maharashtra (10,580).&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 31st March, 2017, most PHCs were found in Uttar Pradesh (3,621), followed by Karnataka (2,359) and Rajasthan (2,079).&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 31st March, 2017, most CHCs were found in Uttar Pradesh (822), followed by Rajasthan (579) and Tamil Nadu (385).<br /> <br /> &bull; Medical care facilities under AYUSH by management status i.e. dispensaries &amp; hospitals were 27,698 and 3,943 respectively, as on 1st April, 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of licensed blood banks in the country till June, 2017 was 2,903. The highest number of blood banks are found in Maharashtra (328), followed by Uttar Pradesh (294) and Tamil Nadu (291).&nbsp;&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; In total, there were 469 eye banks (362 privately run and 107 government run) in the country as on 4th January, 2018. Most eye banks were found in Maharashtra (166), followed by Karnataka (39) and Madhya Pradesh (36).<br /> <br /> <strong>Achievement of health-related SDGs targets</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; On most targets pertaining to health-related Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), India lags behind the target. For example, although the target for coverage of essential health services is 100 percent (indicator no. 3.8.1), in our country only 57 percent of the population is covered by such services. Similarly, although the target for Maternal Mortality Ratio (per 1,00,000 live births) is 70 by 2030 (indicator no. 3.1.1), MMRatio in India presently is 174.<br /> <br /> &bull; The target for Under-five mortality rate (per 1000 live births) is 25 by 2030 (indicator no. 3.2.1). However, U5MR in the country is 47.7.<br /> <br /> &bull; In case of many SDG-related indicators such as Suicide mortality rate (per 100,000 population) (indicator no. 3.4.2) or say Adolescent birth rate (per 1000 women aged 15-19 years) (indicator no. 3.7.2), the SDG target is yet to be determined.<br /> <br /> &bull; For many SDG-related indicators such as Hepatitis B incidence (indicator no. 3.3.4) or say Proportion of the population with access to affordable medicines and vaccines on a sustainable basis (indicator no. 3.b.1), the data for India is either not provided or remain unavailable.<br /> <br /> <strong>Table: Current Status of Health-related Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Target - Indian Scenario</strong><br /> <br /> <img alt="SDGs" src="tinymce/uploaded/SDGs_1.jpg" style="height:242px; width:334px" /><br /> <br /> <em><strong>Source:</strong> Monitoring Health in the Sustainable Development Goals: 2017, World Health Organization, Regional Office for South East Asia, as quoted in the National Health Profile 2018, please <a href="https://bit.ly/2MmfuuK">click here</a> to access, page no. 288<br /> <br /> Report of the Inter-Agency and Expert Group on Sustainable Development Goal Indicators (E/CN.3/2016/2/Rev.1), please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Final%20list%20of%20SDG%20indicators.pdf">click here</a> to access </em><br /> <br /> <br /> &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">While state-level trends for some important health indicators have been available in India, a comprehensive assessment of the diseases causing the most premature deaths and disability in each state, the risk factors responsible for this burden, and their time trends have not been available in a single standardised framework. The India State-level Disease Burden Initiative was launched in October 2015 to address this crucial knowledge gap with support from the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare of the Government of India. This is a collaborative effort between the Indian Council of Medical Research, Public Health Foundation of India, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, and experts and stakeholders from about 100 institutions across India. The work of this Initiative is overseen by an Advisory Board consisting of eminent policymakers and involves extensive engagement of 14 domain expert groups with the estimation process. Based on intense work over two years, this report describes the distribution and trends of diseases and risk factors for every state of India from 1990 to 2016.<br /> <br /> The estimates were produced as part of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. The analytical methods of this study have been standardised over two decades of scientific work, which has been reported in over 16,000 peer-reviewed publications, making it the most widely used approach globally for disease burden estimation. These methods enable standardised comparisons of health loss caused by different diseases and risk factors, between geographic units, sexes, and age groups, and over time in a unified framework. The key metric used for this comparison is disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), which is the sum of the number of years of life lost due to premature death and a weighted measure of the years lived with disability due to a disease or injury. The use of DALYs to track disease burden is recommended by India&rsquo;s National Health Policy of 2017.<br /> <br /> It is to be noted that attributable burden is the share of the burden of a disease that can be estimated to occur due to exposure to a particular risk factor.<br /> <br /> According to the report entitled [inside]India: Health of the Nation&rsquo;s States - The India State-Level Disease Burden Initiative, Disease Burden Trends in the States of India 1990 to 2016 (released in October, 2017) [/inside], prepared by Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), Public Health Foundation of India (PHFI), Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) and Ministry of Health &amp; Family Welfare (MoHFW), please <a href="https://im4change.org/docs/11592India_Health_of.pdf">click here</a> to access:<br /> <br /> <em>Health status improving, but major inequalities between states</em><br /> <br /> &bull; Life expectancy at birth improved in India from 59.7 years in 1990 to 70.3 years in 2016 for females, and from 58.3 years to 66.9 years for males. There were, however, continuing inequalities between states, with a range of 66.8 years in Uttar Pradesh to 78.7 years in Kerala for females, and from 63.6 years in Assam to 73.8 years in Kerala for males in 2016.<br /> <br /> &bull; The per person disease burden measured as DALYs rate dropped by 36 percent from 1990 to 2016 in India, after adjusting for the changes in the population age structure during this period. But there was an almost two-fold difference in this disease burden rate between the states in 2016, with Assam, Uttar Pradesh, and Chhattisgarh having the highest rates, and Kerala and Goa the lowest rates.<br /> <br /> &bull; While the disease burden rate in India has improved since 1990, it was 72 percent higher per person than in Sri Lanka or China in 2016.<br /> <br /> &bull; The under-5 mortality rate has reduced substantially from 1990 in all states, but there was a four-fold difference in this rate between the highest in Assam and Uttar Pradesh as compared with the lowest in Kerala in 2016, highlighting the vast health inequalities between the states.<br /> <br /> <em>Large differences between states in the changing disease profile</em><br /> <br /> &bull; Of the total disease burden in India measured as DALYs, 61 percent was due to communicable, maternal, neonatal, and nutritional diseases (termed infectious and associated diseases in this summary for simplicity) in 1990, which dropped to 33 percent in 2016.<br /> <br /> &bull; There was a corresponding increase in the contribution of non-communicable diseases from 30 percent of the total disease burden in 1990 to 55 percent in 2016, and of injuries from 9 percent to 12 percent.<br /> <br /> &bull; Infectious and associated diseases made up the majority of disease burden in most of the states in 1990, but this was less than half in all states in 2016. However, the year when infectious and associated diseases transitioned to less than half of the total disease burden ranged from 1986 to 2010 for the various state groups in different stages of this transition.<br /> <br /> &bull; The wide variations between the states in this epidemiological transition are reflected in the range of the contribution of major disease groups to the total disease burden in 2016: 48 percent to 75 percent for non-communicable diseases, 14 percent to 43 percent for infectious and associated diseases, and 9 percent to 14 percent for injuries. Kerala, Goa, and Tamil Nadu have the largest dominance of non-communicable diseases and injuries over infectious and associated diseases, whereas this dominance is present but relatively the lowest in Bihar, Jharkhand, Uttar Pradesh, and Rajasthan.<br /> <br /> &bull; It is to be noted that epidemiological transition level (ETL) is based on the ratio of the number of DALYs in a population due to communicable, maternal, neonatal, and nutritional diseases to the number of DALYs due to non-communicable diseases and injuries together. A decreasing ratio indicates advancing epidemiological transition with an increasing relative burden from non-communicable diseases as compared with communicable, maternal, neonatal, and nutritional diseases.<br /> <br /> &bull; The major EAG states of Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh both have a relatively lower level of development indicators and are at a similar less advanced epidemiological transition stage. However, Uttar Pradesh had 50 percent higher disease burden per person from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 54 percent higher burden from tuberculosis, and 30 percent higher burden from diarrhoeal diseases, whereas Madhya Pradesh had 76% higher disease burden per person from stroke. The cardiovascular risks were generally higher in Madhya Pradesh, and the unsafe water and sanitation risk was relatively higher in Uttar Pradesh.<br /> <br /> &bull; The two North-East India states of Manipur and Tripura are both at a lower-middle stage of epidemiological transition but have quite different disease burden rates from specific leading diseases. Tripura had 49% higher per person burden from ischaemic heart disease, 52 percent higher from stroke, 64 percent higher from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 159 percent higher from iron-deficiency anaemia, 59 percent higher from lower respiratory infections, and 56 percent higher from neonatal disorders. Manipur, on the other hand, had 88 percent higher per person burden from tuberculosis and 38 percent higher from road injuries. Regarding the level of risks, child and maternal malnutrition, air pollution, and several of the cardiovascular risks were higher in Tripura.<br /> <br /> &bull; The two adjoining north Indian states of Himachal Pradesh and Punjab both have a relatively higher level of development indicators and are at a similar more advanced epidemiological transition stage. However, there were striking differences between them in the level of burden from specific leading diseases. Punjab had 157 percent higher per person burden from diabetes, 134 percent higher burden from ischaemic heart disease, 49 percent higher burden from stroke, and 56 percent higher burden from road injuries. On the other hand, Himachal Pradesh had 63 percent higher per person burden from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Consistent with these findings, Punjab had substantially higher levels of cardiovascular risks than Himachal Pradesh.<br /> <br /> <em>Rising burden of non-communicable diseases in all states</em><br /> <br /> &bull; The contribution of most of the major non-communicable disease groups to the total disease burden has increased all over India since 1990, including cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, chronic respiratory diseases, mental health and neurological disorders, cancers, musculoskeletal disorders, and chronic kidney disease.<br /> <br /> &bull; Among the leading non-communicable diseases, the largest disease burden or DALY rate increase from 1990 to 2016 was observed for diabetes, at 80 percent, and ischaemic heart disease, at 34 percent. In 2016, three of the five leading individual causes of disease burden in India were non-communicable, with ischaemic heart disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as the top two causes and stroke as the fifth leading cause.<br /> <br /> &bull; The range of disease burden or DALY rate among the states in 2016 was 9 fold for ischaemic heart disease, 4 fold for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and 6 fold for stroke, and 4 fold for diabetes across India. While ischaemic heart disease and diabetes generally had higher DALY rates in states that are at a more advanced epidemiological transition stage toward non-communicable diseases, the DALY rates of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were generally higher in the EAG states that are at a relatively less advanced epidemiological transition stage.<br /> <br /> &bull; The DALY rates of stroke varied across the states without any consistent pattern in relation to the stage of epidemiological transition. This variety of trends of the different major non-communicable diseases indicates that policy and health system interventions to tackle their increasing burden have to be informed by the specific trends in each state.<br /> <br /> <em>Infectious and associated diseases reducing, but still high in many states</em><br /> <br /> &bull; The burden of most infectious and associated diseases reduced in India from 1990 to 2016, but five of the ten individual leading causes of disease burden in India in 2016 still belonged to this group: diarrhoeal diseases, lower respiratory infections, iron-deficiency anaemia, preterm birth complications, and tuberculosis.<br /> <br /> &bull; The burden caused by these conditions generally continues to be much higher in the Empowered Action Group (EAG) and North-East state groups than in the other states, but there were notable variations between the states within these groups as well.<br /> <br /> &bull; One should noted that the Empowered Action Group (EAG) states is a group of eight states that receive special development effort attention from the Government of India, namely, Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Odisha, Rajasthan, Uttarakhand, and Uttar Pradesh.<br /> <br /> &bull; For India as whole, the disease burden or DALY rate for diarrhoeal diseases, iron-deficiency anaemia, and tuberculosis was 2.5 to 3.5 times higher than the average globally for other geographies at a similar level of development, indicating that this burden can be brought down substantially.<br /> <br /> <em>Increasing but variable burden of injuries among states</em><br /> <br /> &bull; The contribution of injuries to the total disease burden has increased in most states since 1990. The highest proportion of disease burden due to injuries is in young adults. Road injuries and self-harm, which includes suicides and non-fatal outcomes of self-harm, are the leading contributors to the injury burden in India.<br /> <br /> &bull; The range of disease burden or DALY rate varied 3 fold for road injuries and 6 fold for self-harm among the states of India in 2016.<br /> <br /> &bull; The burden due to road injuries was much higher in males than in females. The DALY rate for self-harm for India as a whole was 1.8 times higher than the average globally for other geographies at a similar level of development in 2016.<br /> <br /> <em>Rising risks for cardiovascular diseases and diabetes</em><br /> <br /> &bull; Of the total disease burden in India in 1990, a tenth was caused by a group of risks including unhealthy diet, high blood pressure, high blood sugar, high cholesterol, and overweight, which mainly contribute to ischaemic heart disease, stroke, and diabetes. The contribution of this group of risks increased massively to a quarter of the total disease burden in India in 2016.<br /> <br /> &bull; The combination of these risks was highest in Punjab, Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Andhra Pradesh, and Maharashtra in 2016, but importantly, the contribution of these risks has increased in every state of the country since 1990.<br /> <br /> &bull; The other significant contributor to cardiovascular diseases and diabetes, as well as to cancers and some other diseases, is tobacco use, which was responsible for 6% of the total disease burden in India in 2016. All of these risks are generally higher in males than in females.<br /> <br /> <em>Unacceptably high risk of child and maternal malnutrition</em><br /> <br /> &bull; While the disease burden due to child and maternal malnutrition has dropped in India substantially since 1990, this is still the single largest risk factor, responsible for 15% of the total disease burden in India in 2016. This burden is highest in the major EAG states and Assam, and is higher in females than in males.<br /> <br /> &bull; Child and maternal malnutrition contributes to disease burden mainly through increasing the risk of neonatal disorders, nutritional deficiencies, diarrhoeal diseases, lower respiratory infections, and other common infections.<br /> <br /> &bull; As a stark contrast, the disease burden due to child and maternal malnutrition in India was 12 times higher per person than in China in 2016. Kerala had the lowest burden due to this risk among the Indian states, but even this was 2.7 times higher per person than in China.<br /> <br /> <em>Unsafe water and sanitation improving, but not enough yet</em><br /> <br /> &bull; Unsafe water and sanitation was the second leading risk responsible for disease burden in India in 1990, but dropped to the seventh leading risk in 2016, contributing 5 percent of the total disease burden, mainly through diarrhoeal diseases and other infections.<br /> <br /> &bull; Risk factors means potentially modifiable causes of disease and injury.<br /> <br /> &bull; The burden due to this risk is also highest in several EAG states and Assam, and higher in females than in males. The improvement in exposure to this risk from 1990 to 2016 was least in the EAG states, indicating that higher focus is needed in these states for more rapid improvements.<br /> <br /> &bull; The per person disease burden due to unsafe water and sanitation was 40 times higher in India than in China in 2016.<br /> <br /> <em>Household air pollution improving, outdoor air pollution worsening</em><br /> <br /> &bull; The contribution of air pollution to disease burden remained high in India between 1990 and 2016, with levels of exposure among the highest in the world. It causes burden through a mix of non-communicable and infectious diseases, mainly cardiovascular diseases, chronic respiratory diseases, and lower respiratory infections.<br /> <br /> &bull; The burden of household air pollution decreased during the period 1990-2016 due to decreasing use of solid fuels for cooking, and that of outdoor air pollution increased due to a variety of pollutants from power production, industry, vehicles, construction, and waste burning.<br /> <br /> &bull; Household air pollution was responsible for 5 percent of the total disease burden in India in 2016, and outdoor air pollution for 6 percent. The burden due to household air pollution is highest in the EAG states, where its improvement since 1990 has also been the slowest. On the other hand, the burden due to outdoor air pollution is highest in a mix of northern states, including Haryana, Uttar Pradesh, Punjab, Rajasthan, Bihar, and West Bengal.<br /> &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> The report entitled National Health Accounts: Estimates for India 2014-15 (released in October, 2017) provides healthcare expenditures in India based on National Health Accounts Guidelines for India, 2016 (with refinements where required) that adhere to System of Health Accounts 2011 (SHA 2011), a global standard framework for producing health accounts. The NHA estimates for India is a result of an institutionalised process wherein, the boundaries, data sources, classification codes and estimation methodology have all been standardised in consultation with national and international experts under the guidance of NHA Expert Group for India.<br /> <br /> The NHA provides key indicators to understand financing of health system in the country and allows for comparison with other countries. The National Health Policy 2017 sets out several goals related to healthcare financing and emphasizes the need to track expenditures on health through a robust system of National Health Accounts. The production of annual NHA estimates builds a database for tracking trends in allocations for health by union/state governments and estimate the burden of out-of-pocket payments.<br /> <br /> The key findings of the report entitled [inside]National Health Accounts: Estimates for India 2014-15 (released in October, 2017)[/inside], which has been prepared by the National Health Accounts Technical Secretariat, National Health Systems Resource Centre and Ministry of Health and Family Welfare&nbsp; are as follows (please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/National%20Health%20Accounts%20Estimates%20Report%202014-15.pdf" title="National Health Accounts Estimates for India 2014-15">click here</a> to access):<br /> <br /> &bull; The Total Health Expenditure (THE) for India is estimated at Rs. 4,83,259 crores (3.89 percent of GDP and Rs. 3,826 per capita) for the year 2014-15. THE constitutes current and capital expenditures incurred by Government and Private Sources including External/Donor funds. Current Health Expenditure (CHE) is Rs. 4,51,286 crores (93.4 percent of THE) and capital expenditures is Rs. 31,973 crores (6.6 percent of THE).<br /> <br /> &bull; The Government Health Expenditure (GHE) including capital expenditure is Rs. 1,39,949 crores (29 percent of THE, 1.13 percent GDP and Rs. 1,108 per capita) for the year 2014-15. This amounts to about 3.94 percent of General Government Expenditure in 2014-15. Of the GHE, Union Government share is 37 percent and State Government share is 63 percent. Union Government Expenditure on National Health Mission is Rs. 20,199 crores, Defence Medical Services Rs. 6,695 crores, Railway Health Services is Rs. 2,111 crores, Central Government Health Scheme (CGHS) is Rs. 2,300 crores and Ex Servicemen Contributory Health Scheme (ECHS) is Rs. 2,243 crores.<br /> <br /> &bull; The Out-of-Pocket Expenditure (OOPE) on health by households is Rs. 3,02,425 crores (62.6 percent of THE, 2.4 percent of GDP, Rs. 2,394 per capita) for the year 2014-15. Private Health Insurance expenditure is Rs. 17,755 crores (3.7 percent of THE) for the year 2014-15.<br /> <br /> &bull; Of the Current Health Expenditure, Union Government share is Rs. 37,221 crores (8.2 percent) and the State Government&rsquo;s share Rs. 59,978 crores (13.3 percent). Local bodies&rsquo; share is Rs. 2,960 crores (0.7 percent), Households share (including insurance contributions) about Rs. 3,20,262 crores (71 percent, OOPE being 67 percent). Contribution by enterprises (including insurance contributions) is Rs. 20,069 crores (4.4 percent) and NGOs is Rs. 7,422 crores (1.6 percent). External/donor funding contributes to about Rs. 3,374 crores (0.7 percent).<br /> <br /> &bull; The Current Health Expenditure attributed to Government Hospitals is Rs. 64,685 crores (14.3 percent) and Private Hospitals Rs. 1, 16,943 (25.9 percent). Expenditures incurred on other Government Providers (including PHC, Dispensaries and Family Planning Centres) is Rs. 27,782 crores (6.2 percent), Other Private Providers (incl. private clinics) is Rs. 23,795 crores (5.3 percent), Providers of Patient Transport and Emergency Rescue is Rs. 20,627 crores (4.6 percent), Medical and Diagnostic laboratories is Rs. 21,058 crores (4.7 percent), Pharmacies is Rs. 1,30,451 crores (28.9 percent), Other Retailers is Rs. 559 crores (0.1 percent), Providers of Preventive care is Rs. 23,817 crores (5.3 percent), and Other Providers is Rs. 9,985 crores (2.2 percent). About Rs. 11,584 crores (2.6 percent) is attributed to Providers of Health System Administration and Financing.<br /> <br /> &bull; Current health expenditure attributed to Inpatient Curative Care is Rs. 1,58,334 crores (35.1 percent), Outpatient curative care is Rs. 73,059 crores (16.2 percent), Patient Transportation is Rs. 20,627 crores (4.6 percent), Laboratory and Imaging services is Rs. 21,058 crores (4.7 percent), Prescribed Medicines is Rs. 1,28,887 crores (28.6 percent), Over The Counter (OTC) Medicines is Rs. 1564 crores (0.3 percent), Therapeutic Appliances and Medical Goods is Rs. 559 crores (0.1 percent), Preventive Care is Rs. 30,420 crores (6.7 percent), and others is Rs. 5,194 crores (1.2 percent). About Rs. 11,584 crores (2.6 percent) is attributed to Governance and Health System Administration.<br /> <br /> &bull; Total Pharmaceutical Expenditure is 37.9 percent of CHE (includes prescribed medicines, over the counter drugs and those provided during an inpatient, outpatient or any other event involving a contact with health care provider). The Expenditure on Traditional, Complementary and Alternative Medicine (TCAM) is 16 percent of CHE.<br /> <br /> &bull; The Current Health Expenditure attributed to Primary Care is 45.1 percent, Secondary Care is 35.6 percent, Tertiary care is 15.6 percent and governance and supervision is 2.6 percent. When this is disaggregated; Government expenditure on Primary Care is 51.3 percent, Secondary Care is 21.9 percent and Tertiary Care is 14 percent. Private expenditure on Primary Care is 43.1 percent, Secondary Care is 39.9 percent and Tertiary Care is 16.1 percent.<br /> &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/National%20Health%20Policy%202017.pdf">click here</a> to access the [inside]National Health Policy 2017[/inside].</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> The National Health Profile provides the latest data on all major health sector-related indicators in a comprehensive manner. It gives information on 6 major sectors i.e. Demographic, Socio-economic, Health Status, Health Finance, Health Infrastructure and Human Resources.&nbsp;<br /> <br /> According to the [inside]National Health Profile 2015[/inside], produced by the Central Bureau of Health Intelligence, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, (please <a href="http://www.cbhidghs.nic.in/E-Book%20HTML-2015/index.html">click here</a> to access):<br /> <br /> <strong><em>Demographic indicators</em></strong><br /> <br /> &bull; Infant Mortality Rate has declined considerably (40 per 1000 live births in 2013), however differentials of rural (44) and urban (27) are still high.<br /> <br /> &bull; Maternal Mortality Ratio (per 1 lakh live births) is highest in Assam (300) and lowest in Kerala (61) in 2011-13.<br /> <br /> &bull; The life expectancy at birth has increased from 49.7 years in 1970-75 to 66.1 years in 2006-10. During 2006-10, the life expectancy for females has been 67.7 years and males has been 64.6 years.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; Among the states, sex ratio is least for Haryana (879) while among the UTs, Daman and Diu (618) lags behind. Kerala (1084) tops the list with maximum sex ratio.<br /> <br /> &bull; The Total Fertility Rate (TFR) for the country has been 2.3 in 2013. In rural areas it has been 2.5, and in urban areas it has been 1.8.<br /> <br /> <strong><em>Socio-economic indicators</em></strong><br /> <br /> &bull; Literacy rate stood at 73 percent in 2011. Literacy rate among females has been 64.6 percent and males has been 80.9 percent. Literacy rate in urban areas (84.1 percent) has been more as compared to the same in rural areas (67.8 percent). Literacy rate has been highest in Kerala (94 percent)<br /> <br /> &bull; The percentage of population below the poverty line (as per Tendulkar methodology) has been 21.9 percent in 2011-12. The percentage of population below the poverty line in rural areas has been 25.7 percent and in urban areas has been 13.7 percent.<br /> <br /> &bull; The per capita Net National Income at current prices increased almost 3 times from Rs. 24,143 in 2004-05 to Rs. 74,920 in 2013-14.<br /> <br /> &bull; The per capita per day net availability of cereals has increased from 386.2 gm in 2001 to 468.9 gm in 2013. Similarly, the per capita per day net availability of pulses has increased from 30 gm in 2001 to 41.9 gm in 2013.<br /> <br /> &bull; Slum population in India is projected to increase from 9.30 crore in 2011 to 10.47 crore in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; Of the total 1.34 crore residences in slums, nearly 58.5 percent are in good condition, 37.4 percent are in livable condition and 4.1 percent are in dilapidated condition.&nbsp;<br /> <br /> <strong><em>Health status </em></strong><br /> <br /> &bull; Based on available evidence, cardiovascular disease (24 percent), chronic respiratory disease (11 percent), cancer (6 percent) and diabetes (2 percent) are the leading cause of mortality in India.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of dengue cases in India has grown from 28,292 in 2010 to 40,425 in 2014. The total number of dengue related deaths stood at 131 in 2014.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of Japanese Encephalitis cases in India has grown from 555 in 2010 to 1,652 in 2014. The total number of Japanese Encephalitis related deaths stood at 292 in 2014.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of malaria cases in India has grown from nearly 16 lakh in 2010 to 10.71 lakh in 2014. The total number of malaria related deaths stood at 535 in 2014.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of Chikungunya fever cases in India has reduced from 48,176 in 2010 to 15,445 in 2014.&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; Nearly 47 percent of deliveries in India during 2012-13 were institutional whereas 52.3 percent deliveries took place at home.&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; Nearly 40.5 percent of children under 3 years of age were breastfed within an hour of birth in 2012-13.&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; At the national level, nearly 54 percent of children aged 12-23 months received full vaccination during 2012-13.<br /> <br /> &bull; The incidence of infanticide was 82 and foeticide was 210 in 2012.<br /> <br /> <strong><em>Health finance</em></strong><br /> <br /> &bull; Per capita public expenditure on health in nominal terms has gone up from Rs. 621 in 2009-10 to Rs. 1280 in 2014-15.<br /> <br /> &bull; Public expenditure on health as a percentage of GDP has gone up from 1.12 percent in 2009-10 to 1.26 percent in 2014-15.<br /> <br /> &bull; The Centre-state share in total public expenditure on health has changed from 36:64 in 2009-10 to 30:70 in 2014-15.<br /> <br /> &bull; Out-of-pocket (OOP) medical expenditure incurred during 2011-12 has been Rs. 146 per capita per month for urban India and Rs. 95 for rural India.<br /> <br /> &bull; Over 60 percent of total OOP health expenditure is on medicines, both in rural and urban India in 2011-12.<br /> <br /> &bull; As a share of total consumption expenditure, OOP expenditure on health has been 6.7 percent in rural India and 5.5 percent in urban India in 2011-12.<br /> <br /> &bull; Per capita OOP expenditure as well as the share of OOP in total consumption expenditure was positively correlated with consumption expenditure fractiles; higher fractiles had higher levels of both per capita OOP and share of OOP in consumption expenditure in 2011-12.<br /> <br /> &bull; Among all the states, Kerala had the highest per capita OOP medical expenditure as well as its share in total consumption expenditure in 2011-12.<br /> <br /> &bull; Around 22 crore individuals were covered under any health insurance in 2013-14. This means 18 percent of the population has been covered under any health insurance.<br /> <br /> <strong><em>Human resources in health sector</em></strong><br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of doctors possessing recognized medical qualification (under the IMC Act), registered with state medical councils or Medical Council of India, stood at 15,976 in 2014.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of dental surgeons registered with the Central/ State Dental Councils of India stood at 1.54 lakhs in 2014, which was 21,720 in 1994.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of Government allopathic doctors stood at 1.06 lakhs and the total number of Government dental surgeons stood at 5,614.<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 31 December, 2014, the total number of Auxiliary Nurse Midwives (ANMs) stood at 7.86 lakh, whereas Registered Nurses &amp; Registered Midwives (RN &amp; RM) stood at 17.8 lakhs and Lady Health Visitors (LHV) stood at 55,914.<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 27 June, 2014, the total number of pharmacists stood at 6.64 lakh.<br /> <br /> <strong><em>Health infrastructure</em></strong><br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of licensed blood banks in India as on February 2015 is 2760.<br /> <br /> &bull; There are 20,306 hospitals having 6.76 lakh beds in India. There are 16,816 hospitals in rural areas having 1.84 lakh beds and 3,490 hospitals in urban areas having 4.92 lakh beds.<br /> <br /> &bull; The number of medical colleges in India has more than doubled from 146 in 1991-92 to 398 in 2014-15.<br /> &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> The 71st round National Sample Survey on &ldquo;Social Consumption: Health&rdquo; was conducted during January to June 2014. The information in the survey was collected from 36,480 households in rural areas and 29,452 households in urban areas during the 71st round.<br /> <br /> The key findings of the [inside]71st round NSS report: Key Indicators of Social Consumption in India Health (published in June 2015)[/inside] are as follows (please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/nss_71st_ki_health_30june15.pdf" title="NSS 71st Round Health">click here</a> to access the full report; please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/NSS%20Press%20Release%20Health.pdf" title="NSS Press Note Health">click here</a> to read the summary of findings):<br /> <br /> <em>A. Non-hospitalized treatment</em><br /> <br /> &bull; The Proportion (per 1000) of Ailing Persons (PAP), measured as the number of living persons reporting ailments (per 1000 persons), was 89 persons in rural India and 118 persons in urban India.<br /> <br /> &bull; Inclination towards allopathy treatment was prevalent (around 90% in both the sectors). Only 5 to 7 percent usage of &lsquo;other&rsquo; including AYUSH (Ayurveda, Yoga or Naturopathy Unani, Siddha and homoeopathy) was reported both in rural and urban area. Moreover, un-treated spell was higher in rural (both for male and female) than urban areas.<br /> <br /> &bull; Private doctors were the most important single source of treatment in both the sectors (Rural &amp; Urban). More than 70 percent (72 per cent in the rural areas and 79 per cent in the urban areas) spells of ailment were treated in the private sector (consisting of private doctors, nursing homes, private hospitals, charitable institutions, etc.).<br /> <br /> <em>B. Hospitalized treatment</em><br /> <br /> &bull; Medical treatment of an ailing person as an in-patient in any medical institution having provision for treating the sick as in-patients, was considered as hospitalised treatment. In the urban population, 4.4 percent persons were hospitalised at some time during a reference period of 365 days. The proportion of persons hospitalised in the rural areas was lower (3.5 percent).<br /> <br /> &bull; It is observed that in rural India, 42 percent hospitalised treatment was carried out in public hospital and rest 58 percent in private hospital. For the urban India, the corresponding figures were 32 percent and 68 percent. It may be noted in this context that households (or persons within households) were segregated in sector (rural/urban) by their place of domicile, and not by the place of treatment.<br /> <br /> &bull; Preference towards allopathy treatment was observed in cases of hospitalised treatment as well.<br /> <br /> <em>C. Cost of treatment - as in-patient and other</em><br /> <br /> &bull; Average medical expenditure per hospitalisation case: Higher amount was spent for treatment per hospitalised case by people in the private hospitals (Rs. 25850) than in the public hospitals (Rs. 6120). The highest expenditure was recorded for treatment of Cancer (Rs. 56712) followed by that for Cardio-vascular diseases (Rs. 31647).<br /> <br /> &bull; Average medical expenditure per non-hospitalisation case was Rs. 509 in rural India and Rs. 639 in urban India.<br /> <br /> &bull; As much as 86 percent of rural population and 82 percent of urban population were still not covered under any scheme of health expenditure support. Government, however, was able to bring about 12 percent urban and 13 percent rural population under health protection coverage through Rastriya Swasthya Bima Yojana (RSBY) or similar plan. Only 12 percent households of the 5th quintile class (Usual Monthly Per Capita Consumer Expenditure) of urban area had some arrangement of medical insurance from private provider.<br /> <br /> <em>D. Incidence of childbirth, Expenditure on institutional childbirth</em><br /> <br /> &bull; In rural area 9.6% women (age 15-49) were pregnant at any time during the reference period of 365 days; for urban this proportion was 6.8%. Evidence of interrelation of place of childbirth with level of living is noted both in rural and urban areas. In the rural areas, about 20% of the childbirths were at home or any other place other than the hospitals. The same for urban areas was 10.5%. Among the institutional childbirth, 55.5% took place in public hospital and 24% in private hospital in rural area. In urban area, however, the corresponding figures were 42% and 47.5% respectively.<br /> <br /> &bull; An average of Rs. 5544 was spent per childbirth (as inpatient) in rural area and Rs. 11685 in urban area. The rural population spent, on an average, Rs. 1587 for the same in a public sector hospital and Rs. 14778 for one in a private sector hospital. The corresponding figures for urban India were Rs. 2117 and Rs. 20328.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> The key findings of the [inside]Draft National Health Policy 2015 (published in December 2014)[/inside], prepared by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare are as follows (Please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Draft%20National%20Health%20Policy%202015.pdf" title="Draft NHP 2015">click here</a> to download):<br /> <br /> &bull; The draft National Health Policy accepts and endorses the understanding that a full achievement of the goals and principles as defined would require an increased public health expenditure to 4% to 5% of the GDP. However, given that the NHP, 2002 target of 2% was not met, and taking into account the financial capacity of the country to provide this amount and the institutional capacity to utilize the increased funding in an effective manner, the present draft health policy proposes a potentially achievable target of raising public health expenditure to 2.5% of the GDP. It also notes that 40% of this would need to come from Central expenditures. At current prices, a target of 2.5% of GDP translates to Rs. 3800 per capita, representing an almost four fold increase in five years.<br /> <br /> &bull; The private sector today provides nearly 80% of outpatient care and about 60% of inpatient care. (The out-patient estimate would be significantly lower if we included only qualified providers. By NSSO estimates as much as 40% of the private care is likely to be by informal unqualified providers). 72% of all private health care enterprises are own-account-enterprises (OAEs), which are household run businesses providing health services without hiring a worker on a fairly regular basis.<br /> <br /> &bull; In terms of comparative efficiency, public sector is value for money as it accounts (based on the NSSO 60th round) for less than 30% of total expenditure, but provides for about 20% of outpatient care and 40% of in-patient care. This same expenditure also pays for 60% of end-of-life care (RGI estimates on hospital mortality), and almost 100% of preventive and promotive care and a substantial part of medical and nursing education as well.<br /> <br /> &bull; Thailand has almost the same total health expenditure as India but its proportion of public health expenditure is 77.7% of total health expenditures (which is 3.2% of the GDP) and this is spent through a form of strategic purchasing in which about 95% is purchased from public health care facilities- which is what gives it such a high efficiency. Brazil spends 9% of its GDP on health but of this public health expenditure constitutes 4.1% of the GDP (which is 45.7% of total health expenditure). This public health expenditure accounts for almost 75% of all health care provision. It would be ambitious if India could aspire to a public health expenditure of 4% of the GDP, but most expert groups have estimated 2.5% as being more realistic.<br /> <br /> &bull; As costs of care rise, affordability, as distinct from equity, requires emphasis. Health care costs of a household exceeding 10% of its total monthly consumption expenditures or 40% of its non-food consumption expenditure- is designated catastrophic health expenditures- and is declared as an unacceptable level of health care costs.<br /> <br /> &bull; Almost all hospitalization even in public hospitals leads to catastrophic health expenditures, and over 63 million persons are faced with poverty every year due to health care costs alone. It is because there is no financial protection for the vast majority of health care needs. In 2011-12, the share of out-of-pocket expenditure on health care as a proportion of total household monthly per capita expenditure was 6.9% in rural areas and 5.5% in urban areas. This led to an increasing number of households facing catastrophic expenditures due to health costs (18% of all households in 2011-12 as compared to 15% in 2004-05). Under NRHM, free care in public hospitals was extended to a select set of conditions &ndash; for maternity, newborn and infant care as part of the Janani Suraksha Yojana and, the Janani Shishu Suraksha Karyakram, and for disease control programmes. For all other services, user fees especially for diagnostics and &ldquo;outside prescriptions&rdquo; for drugs continued. Also, due to the selective approach, several essential services especially for chronic illness was not obtainable or at best only available at overcrowded district and medical college hospitals resulting in physical and financial hardship and poor quality of care.<br /> <br /> &bull; The Central Government under the Ministry of Labour &amp; Employment, launched the Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana (RSBY) in 2008. The population coverage under these various schemes increased from almost 55 million people in 2003-04 to about 370 million in 2014 (almost one-fourth of the population). Nearly two thirds (180 million) of this population are those in the Below Poverty Line (BPL) category. Evaluations show that schemes such as the RSBY, have improved utilization of hospital services, especially in private sector and among the poorest 20% of households and SC/ST households. However there are other problems. One problem is low awareness among the beneficiaries about the entitlement and how and when to use the RSBY card. Another is related to denial of services by private hospitals for many categories of illnesses, and over supply of some services.<br /> <br /> &bull; The private health care industry is valued at $40 billion and is projected to grow to $ 280 billion by 2020 as per market sources. The current growth rate of this perennially and most rapidly growing area of the economy, the healthcare industry, at 14% is projected to be 21% in the next decade. Even during the global recession of 2008, this sector remained relatively recession-proof. The private health care industry is complex and differentiated. It includes insurance and equipment, which accounts for about 15%, pharmaceuticals which accounts for over 25%, about 10% on diagnostics and about 50% is hospitals and clinical care. The private sector growth cannot be seen merely as a consequence of limited public sector investment. The Government has had an active policy in the last 25 years of building a positive economic climate for the health care industry. Amongst these measures are lower direct taxes; higher depreciation in medical equipment; Income Tax exemptions for 5 years for rural hospitals; custom duty exemptions for imported equipment that are lifesaving; Income Tax exemption for Health Insurance; and active engagement through publicly financed health insurance which now covers almost 27% of the population.<br /> <br /> &bull; Maternal mortality now accounts for 0.55% of all deaths and 4% of all female deaths in the 15 to 49 year age group.<br /> <br /> &bull; India is set to reach the Millennium Development Goals (MDG) with respect to maternal and child survival. The MDG target for Maternal Mortality Ratio (MMR) is 140 per 100,000 live births. From a baseline of 560 in 1990, the nation had achieved 178 by 2010-12, and at this rate of decline is estimated to reach an MMR of 141 by 2015.<br /> <br /> &bull; In the case of under-5 mortality rate (U5MR), the MDG target is 42. From a baseline of 126 in 1990, in 2012 the nation has an U5MR of 52 and an extrapolation of this rate would bring it to 42 by 2015. This is particularly creditable on a global scale where in 1990 India&#39;s MMR and U5MR were 47% and 40% above the international average respectively.<br /> <br /> &bull; Although over 90% of pregnant women receive one antenatal check up and 87% received full TT immunization, only about 68.7% of women have received the mandatory three antenatal check-ups. Again whereas most women had received iron and folic acid tablets, only 31% of pregnant women had consumed more than 100 IFA tablets. For institutional delivery, standard protocols are often not followed during labour and the postpartum period. Sterilization related deaths a preventable tragedy, are often a direct consequence of poor quality of care. Only 61% of children (12-23 months) have been fully immunized.<br /> <br /> &bull; In AIDS control, progress has been good with a decline from a 0.41% prevalence rate in 2001 to 0.27% in 2011 but this still leaves about 21 lakh persons living with HIV, with about 1.16 lakh new cases and 1.48 deaths in 2011. In tuberculosis the challenge is a prevalence of close to 211 cases and 19 deaths per 100,000 population and rising problems of multi-drug resistant tuberculosis. Though these are significant declines from the MDG baseline, India still contributes to 24% of all global new case detection.<br /> <br /> &bull; Over 75% of communicable diseases are not part of existing national programmes. Overall, communicable diseases contribute to 24.4% of the entire disease burden while maternal and neonatal ailments contribute to 13.8%. Non-communicable diseases (39.1%) and injuries (11.8%) now constitute the bulk of the country&#39;s disease burden. National Health Programmes for non-communicable diseases are very limited in coverage and scope, except perhaps in the case of the Blindness control programme.<br /> <br /> &bull; The gap between service availability and needs is widest in the case of mental illness- 43 facilities in the nation with a 0.47 psychologists per million people.<br /> <br /> &bull; The elderly i.e. the population above 60 years comprise 8.6% of the population (103.8 million) and they are also a vulnerable section. Those above 75 years (20.52 million) are most vulnerable and almost 8% of the elderly population is bed ridden or homebound (NSSO).<br /> <br /> **page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The report entitled [inside]Economic Burden of Tobacco Related Diseases in India[/inside] (please&nbsp;<a href="tinymce/uploaded/economic_burden_of_tobacco_related_diseases_in_india_executive_summary.pdf" title="Economic Burden of tobacco related diseases">click here</a>&nbsp;to download the Executive Summary), supported by the Ministry of Health &amp; Family Welfare, Government of India and the WHO Country Office for India, was developed by the Public Health Foundation of India (PHFI).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The report estimates direct and indirect costs from all diseases caused due to tobacco use and four specific diseases namely, respiratory diseases, tuberculosis, cardiovascular diseases and cancers. The report also highlights that tobacco use and the associated costs are creating an enormous burden for the nation.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The total economic costs attributable to tobacco use from all diseases in India in the year 2011 for persons aged 35-69 amounted to Rs. 104500 crores of which 16 percent was direct cost and 84 percent was indirect cost.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to the report, massive direct medical costs of tobacco attributable diseases amount to Rs.16,800 crore and associated indirect morbidity cost of Rs. 14,700 crore. The cost from premature mortality is Rs. 73,000 crores, indicating a substantial productive loss to the nation, the report states.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to the United Nations&#39; report (released in May, 2014) entitled [inside]Trends in maternal mortality estimates 1990 to 2013[/inside], (please&nbsp;<a href="tinymce/uploaded/Trends%20in%20Maternal%20Mortality%201990%20to%202013.pdf" title="Trends in Maternal Mortality 1990 to 2013">click here</a>&nbsp;to download):&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em><strong>Indian scenario</strong></em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Maternal mortality ratio (MMR)* in India stood at 560 maternal deaths (per 100000 live births) during 1990, 460 during 1995, 370 during 2000, 280 during 2005 and 190 during 2013.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; As compared to India (MMR: 190 per 100000 live births), Brazil (MMR: 69) and China (MMR: 32) performed better in reducing maternal deaths.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; An Indian woman&rsquo;s lifetime risk of maternal death** &ndash; the probability that a 15 year old woman will eventually die from a maternal cause &ndash; is 1 in 190, whereas for a Chinese woman it is 1 in 1800 and for a Brazilian woman it is 1 in 780.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; At the country level, the two countries that accounted for one third of all global maternal deaths are India at 17 percent (50000) and Nigeria at 14 percent (40000).&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The proportion of deaths among women of reproductive age that are due to maternal causes (PM)*** in India is 6.7 percent whereas for China it is 1.6 percent and for Brazil it is 2.8 percent.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The ten countries that comprised 58 percent of the global maternal deaths reported in 2013 are: India (50000, 17%); Nigeria (40000, 14%); Democratic Republic of the Congo (21000, 7%); Ethiopia (13000, 4%); Indonesia (8800, 3%); Pakistan (7900, 3%); United Republic of Tanzania (7900, 3%); Kenya (6300, 2%); China (5900, 2%); Uganda (5900, 2%).&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; India could reduce MMR by 65 percent between 1990 and 2013.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The present report has classified India among 96 countries with incomplete civil registration and/or other types of maternal mortality data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em><strong>Global scenario</strong></em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Every day, approximately 800 women die from preventable causes related to pregnancy and childbirth.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Under MDG5, countries committed to reducing maternal mortality by three quarters between 1990 and 2015. Since 1990, maternal deaths worldwide have dropped by 45%. However, between 1990 and 2013, the global maternal mortality ratio (i.e. the number of maternal deaths per 100 000 live births) declined by only 2.6% per year. This is far from the annual decline of 5.5% required to achieve MDG5.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; 99 percent of all maternal deaths occur in developing countries. More than half of these deaths occur in sub-Saharan Africa and almost one third occur in South Asia.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The maternal mortality ratio in developing countries in 2013 is 230 per 100 000 live births versus 16 per 100 000 live births in developed countries.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; A woman&rsquo;s lifetime risk of maternal death &ndash; the probability that a 15 year old woman will eventually die from a maternal cause &ndash; is 1 in 3700 in developed countries, versus 1 in 160 in developing countries.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Maternal mortality is higher in women living in rural areas and among poorer communities.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Young adolescents face a higher risk of complications and death as a result of pregnancy than older women.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The major complications that account for 80% of all maternal deaths are: a. severe bleeding (mostly bleeding after childbirth); b. infections (usually after childbirth); c. high blood pressure during pregnancy (pre-eclampsia and eclampsia); and d. unsafe abortion. The remainder are caused by or associated with diseases such as malaria, and AIDS during pregnancy. Skilled care before, during and after childbirth can save the lives of women and newborn babies.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; While levels of antenatal care have increased in many parts of the world during the past decade, only 46 percent of women in low-income countries benefit from skilled care during childbirth.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Other factors that prevent women from receiving or seeking care during pregnancy and childbirth are: poverty, distance, lack of information, inadequate services and cultural practices.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Note:&nbsp;</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">* Maternal mortality ratio (MMR) is the number of maternal deaths during a given time period per 100000 live births during the same time period.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">** Adult lifetime risk of maternal death is the probability that a 15-year-old women will die eventually from a maternal cause.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">*** Proportion of deaths among women of reproductive age that are due to maternal causes (PM) is the number of maternal deaths in a given time period divided by the total deaths among women aged 15&ndash;49 years.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Rural%20Health%20Statistics%20of%20India%202012.pdf" title="Rural Health Statistics of India 2012">click here</a> to access the latest edition of [inside]Rural Health Statistics in India 2012[/inside] that was released by the Union health ministry. The report provides detailed statistics on rural health infrastructure on the basis of information available up to March, 2012 and data provided by the States and Union Territories.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> According to the UNICEF report titled [inside]Committing to Child Survival: A Promise Renewed Progress Report 2013[/inside] (please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/APR_Progress_Report_2013_9_Sept_2013_1.pdf" title="UNICEF child mortality report">click here</a> to download):<br /> <br /> <strong><em>Indian scenario</em></strong><br /> <br /> &bull; Under Five Mortality Rate (Probability of dying between birth and exactly 5 years of age, expressed per 1,000 live births) in India for the year 2012, stands at 56 and India&#39;s ranking in terms of U5MR is 49. In 2012, the neonatal mortality rate (Probability of dying in the first month of life, expressed per 1,000 live births) at national level is at 31. The share of neonatal deaths in under-five deaths stood at 55 percent in 2012 as compared to 41 percent in 1990.&nbsp;&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; U5MR in India declined by 55 percent from 126 in 1990 to 56 in 2012. Infant Mortality Rate (Probability of dying between birth and exactly 1 year of age, expressed per 1,000 live births) declined from 88 in 1990 to 44 in 2012. Neonatal mortality rate declined from 51 in 1990 to 31 in 2012.&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; U5MR in India among boys declined from 121 in 1990 to 54 in 2012. U5MR in India among girls declined from 130 in 1990 to 59 in 2012.<br /> <br /> &bull; In 2012, 21 percent deaths among Indian children under 5 years of age occurred due to pneumonia, 10 percent due to diarrhoea, 1 percent due to malaria, 3 percent due to measles and 43 percent due to neonatal causes.<br /> <br /> &bull; Half of all under-five deaths occur in just five countries: India (22%), Nigeria (13%), Pakistan, the Democratic Republic of the Congo (each 6%) and China (4%).<br /> <br /> &bull; Around two-thirds of neonatal deaths occur in just 10 countries, with India accounting for more than one-quarter and Nigeria for a tenth. More than 4 in 10 of all neonatal deaths worldwide occur in just three countries: India, Nigeria, and Pakistan.<br /> <br /> &bull; More than half of the under-five deaths caused by pneumonia or diarrhoea occur in just four countries: India, Nigeria, Pakistan and the Democratic Republic of the Congo.<br /> <br /> &bull; The Governments of Ethiopia, India and the United States, together with the UN agency, launched in 2012 &lsquo;Committing to Child Survival: A Promise Renewed&#39;, a global effort to accelerate efforts to stop young children from dying from preventable causes. Some 176 governments have signed on, including those making some of the greatest strides in under-five mortality.<br /> <br /> &bull; In February 2013, the Government of India, another cosponsor of the global Call to Action, convened a national forum of state policymakers, technical advisors, civil society organizations and private-sector partners to identify and commit to high-impact strategies that can accelerate the decline in preventable child deaths.<br /> <br /> <strong><em>Global scenario</em></strong><br /> <br /> &bull; In 2012, around 6.6 million children died globally before their fifth birthday, at a rate of around 18,000 per day. Since 1990, 216 million children have died before their fifth birthday &mdash; more than the current total population of Brazil, the world&rsquo;s fifth most populous country.<br /> <br /> &bull; Of the 6.6 million under-five deaths globally in 2012, most were from preventable causes such as pneumonia, diarrhoea or malaria; around 44% of deaths in children under 5 occurred during the neonatal period. Pneumonia and diarrhoea remain leading causes of deaths among children under 5, killing almost 5,000 children under 5 every day. Malaria remains an important cause of child death, killing 1,200 children under 5 every day.<br /> <br /> &bull; Global progress in reducing child deaths since 1990 has been very significant. The global rate of under-five mortality has roughly halved, from 90 deaths per 1,000 live births in 1990 to 48 per 1,000 in 2012. The estimated annual number of under-five deaths has fallen from 12.6 million to 6.6 million over the same period.<br /> <br /> &bull; Put another way, 17,000 fewer children die each day in 2012 than did in 1990 &mdash; thanks to more effective and affordable treatments, innovative ways of delivering critical interventions to the poor and excluded, and sustained political commitment. These and other vital child survival interventions have helped to save an estimated 90 million lives in the past 22 years.<br /> <br /> &bull; The global annual rate of reduction in under-five deaths has steadily accelerated since 1990-1995, when it stood at 1.2%, more than tripling to 3.9% in 2005-2012. Both sub-Saharan African regions&mdash;particularly Eastern and Southern Africa but also West and Central Africa&mdash;have seen a consistent acceleration in reducing under-five deaths, particularly since 2000.<br /> <br /> &bull; At the current rate of reduction in under-five mortality, the world will only make MDG 4 by 2028 &mdash; 13 years after the deadline &mdash; and 35 million more children will die between 2015 and 2028 whose lives could be saved if we were able to make the goal on time in 2015 and continue that trend.<br /> <br /> &bull; Accelerating progress in child survival urgently requires greater attention to ending preventable child deaths in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia, which together account for 4 out of 5 under-five deaths globally.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to the [inside]Pneumonia Progress Report, 2012[/inside], released by IVAC and John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012.pdf" title="Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012">click here</a> to access:</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The 2000-2010 decade brought a significant reduction in overall child mortality, from 9.6 to 7.6 million. Pneumonia continues to be the number one killer of children around the world-causing 18% of all child mortality, an estimated 1.3 million child deaths in 2011 alone.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Nearly 99 percent of all pneumonia deaths occur in developing countries, and three-quarters take place in just 15 countries. The majority of pneumonia cases are preventable or treatable.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Pneumonia is the leading cause of child mortality in India, responsible for the deaths of nearly 400,000 &nbsp;children under five in 2010.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Percentage of Indian children with suspected pneumonia receiving antibiotics stood at 13 percent in 2010.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Percentage of under-five Indian children with suspected pneumonia taken to appropriate health-care provider stood at 69 percent in 2010.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Percentage of children receiving exclusive breastfeeding in first 6 months of life is 46 percent (as per latest available data during 2006-2010).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Vaccine coverage in the case of DTP3 (third dose of diphtheria and tetanus toxoid and pertussis vaccine) is 72 percent and in the case of measles is 74 percent in 2011.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; India and Nigeria, two large countries with the highest numbers of child deaths worldwide, remain low scorers with an average intervention coverage (interventions in terms of vaccination, breastfeeding, access to care and antibiotic treatment) rate of 55% and 40%, respectively.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; One notable area of progress in India is on coverage of two vaccines that can help prevent pneumonia, Hib vaccine and measles vaccine. While Hib vaccine uptake has been slow in India&rsquo;s public sector, momentum is now shifting following efforts by the Ministry of Health &amp; Family Welfare (MOHFW), states, health experts and advocates to prioritize implementation of the National Technical Advisory Group on Immunization&rsquo;s (NTAGI) recommendation to add Hib to the Universal Immunization Programme (UIP).&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Two Indian states, Tamil Nadu and Kerala, introduced Hib vaccines (in the form of the pentavalent vaccine) in December 2011, and six more are slated to do so by the end of 2012. At a recent Hib Symposium in the state of Odisha, MOHFW officials stated that at least twice as many additional states have expressed interest in the vaccine.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; India has joined other WHO Member States in introducing a second dose of measles vaccine into the UIP to ensure its children are protected from the virus, which contributes to the burden of pneumonia. Measles was once one of the leading causes of death in children, but global measles deaths have declined dramatically because of widespread coverage with two doses of measles vaccine. India began a phased introduction of the second dose in 2010; by the end of the first year, the second dose of measles vaccine had been added to routine immunization in 21 states and catch-up campaigns were completed in 197 districts in 14 states.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to the report titled: [inside]Defeating malaria in Asia, the Pacific, Americas, Middle East and Europe, November, 2012[/inside], which has been produced by World Health Organization and PATH,&nbsp;<a href="http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Defeating%20malaria.pdf">http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Defeating%20malaria.pdf</a>: &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The Indian Commission on Macroeconomics and Health notes that, in India, 13 household person-days per patient were lost per episode of malaria. Furthermore, the commission estimated that the overall monetary losses to families (income losses together with treatment expenses) could amount to between 200 and 400 Indian rupees (US$ 3.5 to 7).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; With an estimated 22.5 million malaria cases in India, this translates to an annual cost of US$ 79 to 157 million, or 0.01% of gross domestic product each year.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In states with the highest incidence rates, such as Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Meghalaya, Mizoram, and Orissa, the annual cost of illness represents more than 0.1% of a gross state income.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Tribal populations living in forests in Orissa, India, have incidence rates that are almost 10 times higher than in the plains.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Odisha is one of the most highly malaria-endemic states in India, accounting for 24% of reported cases in 2010 despite consisting of less of than 4% of the national population. Malaria is particularly common among tribal groups which represent 44% of the population of Orissa.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; A study in Sundargarh District of Odisha showed that forest areas had an annual incidence of 280 cases per 1000 population compared to 30 cases per 1000 on the plains. Approximately 84% of infections in forest areas were due to P. falciparum compared to 69% in plain areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Malaria&rsquo;s main victims tend to be poorer populations living in rural communities, with limited or no access to long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; WHO estimates that 216 million cases of malaria occurred globally in 2010; 34 million (16%) of these occurred outside of Africa of which 18.1 million (53%) were due to P. falciparum.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; WHO estimates that 655 000 deaths occurred globally, of which 46 000 (7%) occurred outside of Africa. WHO estimates that 2.5 billion people were at risk of malaria outside of Africa.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; There are 98 countries with ongoing transmission of malaria. Of these, 47 lie on the African continent, 21 are in the Americas, and 30 in Europe, Asia, and the Pacific. Of the 98 countries, 81 are in the control phase, 8 in the pre-elimination phase, and 9 in the elimination phase.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; While the disease burden has been declining in countries with fewer malaria cases and deaths, progress has been slower in countries where the bulk of the disease burden lies: India, Indonesia, Myanmar, Pakistan, and Papua New Guinea. These five high-burden countries account for 89% of all malaria cases in the region.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Malaria transmission occurs in 17 countries of Asia. Approximately 2 billion people in the region live at some risk of malaria, of which 525 million live at high risk (reported incidence more than 1 case per 1000 population per year).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Most reported cases of malaria in Asia are due to P. falciparum although the proportion varies considerably by country; it exceeds 80% in the Lao People&rsquo;s Democratic Republic, Myanmar, Timor-Leste, and Viet Nam, while transmission is exclusively due to P. vivax in the Democratic People&rsquo;s Republic of Korea and the Republic of Korea.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Insecticide resistance has now been reported in 24 out of 51 countries with malaria transmission outside of Africa.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to [inside]Children in India 2012-A Statistical Appraisal[/inside], Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, GoI, please <a href="https://im4change.org/docs/659Children_in_India_2012.pdf">click here</a> to access:</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em><strong>Neonatal Mortality Rate</strong></em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2010, the neonatal mortality rate (Probability of dying in the first month of life, expressed per 1,000 live births) at national level is at 33 and ranges from 19 in urban areas to 36 in rural areas. Among bigger states, neo-natal mortality rate is highest in Madhya Pradesh (44) and lowest in Kerala (7).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The rural&ndash;urban gap in neo natal mortality rate was highest in Andhra Pradesh and Assam (23 points), followed by Rajasthan (22 points). The rural &ndash;urban gap in neo natal mortality rate lowest in Kerala (3 points), followed by Tamil Nadu (6 points).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Factors which affect fetal and neonatal deaths are primarily endogenous, while those which affect post neonatal deaths are primarily exogenous. The endogenous factors are related to the formation of the foetus in the womb and are therefore, mainly biological in nature. Among the biological factors affecting fetal and neonatal infant mortality rates the important ones are the age of the mother, birth order, period of spacing between births, prematurity, weight at birth, mothers health.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em><strong>Infant Mortality Rate&nbsp;</strong></em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Infant Mortality Rate (Probability of dying between birth and exactly 1 year of age, expressed per 1,000 live births) has declined for males from 78 in 1990 to 46 in 2010 and for females the decline was from 81 to 49 during this period.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Infant Mortality Rate for the country as a whole declined from 66 in 2001 to 47 in 2010. With the present improved trend due to sharp fall during 2008-09, the national level estimate of infant mortality rate is likely to be 44 against the MDG target of 27 in 2015.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Infant Mortality Rate has declined in urban areas from 50 in 1990 to 31 in 2010, whereas in rural areas Infant Mortality Rate has declined from 86 to 51 during the same period.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Infant Mortality Rate in 2010, was lowest in Goa (10) followed by Kerala (13) and Manipur (14). The States of Madhya Pradesh (62), Orissa (61), Uttar Pradesh (61), Assam (58), Meghalaya (55), Rajasthan (55), Chhattisgarh (51), Bihar (48) and Haryana (48) reported infant mortality rate above the national average (47).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Among infants, the main causes of death are: Certain Conditions Originating in the Perinatal Period (67.2%), Certain infectious and Parasitic diseases (8.3%), Diseases of the Respiratory System (7.7%), Congenial Malformations, Deformations &amp; chromosomal Abnormalities (3.3%), Other causes (10.6%).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em><strong>Under Five Mortality Rate&nbsp;</strong></em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Under Five Mortality Rate (Probability of dying between birth and exactly 5 years of age, expressed per 1,000 live births) in India for the year 2010, stands at 59 and it varies from 66 in rural areas to 38 in Urban areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Under Five Mortality Rate stood at 64 for females whereas it is 55 for males in 2010.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Under Five Mortality Rate varies from lowest in Kerala (15), followed by 27 in Tamil Nadu to alarmingly high level in Assam (83), followed by Madhya Pradesh (82), Uttar Pradesh (79) and Odisha (78).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Given to reduce Under Five Mortality Rate to 42 per thousand live births by 2015, India tends to reach near to 52 by that year missing the target by 10 percentage points.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Among children aged 0 to 4 years, the main causes of death are: Certain infectious and Parasitic Diseases (23.1%), Diseases of the Respiratory System (16.1%), Diseases of the Nervous System (12.1%), Diseases of the Circulatory System (7.9%), Injury, Poisoning etc (0.9%), Other major causes (33.9 %).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em><strong>Immunization</strong></em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; At national level, 61% of the children aged 12-23 months have received full immunization in 2009. The coverage of immunization was higher in urban areas (67.4%) as compared to that in the rural areas (58.5%).&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Nearly 8% Indian children did not receive even a single vaccine in 2009. Nearly 62% of the male children aged 12-23 months have received full immunization, while among the females it was nearly 60%.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; 76.6 percent of children aged 12-23 months received full immunization coverage whose mothers had 12 or more years of education whereas 45.3 percent of children whose mothers had no education got full immunization.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; About 75.5% of children of less than one year belonging to the highest wealth index group are fully immunized while only 47.3% from the lowest quintile are fully immunized.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The full immunization coverage of children age 12-23 months is highest in Goa (87.9%), followed by Sikkim (85.3%), Punjab (83.6%), and Kerala (81.5%). The full immunization coverage is lowest in Arunachal Pradesh (24.8%).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to [inside]WHO Global Report: Mortality Attributable to Tobacco (2012)[/inside], please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Mortality%20due%20to%20tobacco.pdf" title="Mortality due to tobacco">click here</a> to access:&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Globally 12% of all deaths among adults aged 30 years and over were attributed to tobacco as compared with 16% in India, 17% in Pakistan and 31% in Bangladesh.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In India, the death rate from non-communicable diseases (NCDs) [1096 per 100,000 population] was about 3.3 times that for communicable diseases [336 per 100,000]. Tobacco was responsible for 9% of all NCDs as compared with 2% of all communicable disease related deaths.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The death rate due to tobacco in Indian men was 206 [per 100,000 men aged 30 years and over] as compared with 13 [per 100,000 women aged 30 years and over] for women. The proportion of deaths attributable to tobacco was almost 12% for men and 1% for women in India. &nbsp; &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Within the NCDs, ischaemic heart disease accounted for 329 deaths per 100,000 population aged 30 years and over, with 5% of these deaths attributed to tobacco in India. Cancer of the trachea, bronchus and lung accounted for 16 deaths per 100,000 population but with 58% of these deaths attributed to tobacco.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Within the communicable disease group, deaths attributed to tobacco accounted for 5% of all lower respiratory infection deaths and 4% of all tuberculosis deaths in India. &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The regions with the highest proportion of deaths atrributable to tobacco are the Americas and the European regions where tobacco has been used for a longer period of time.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; 71% of all lung cancer deaths globally are attributable to tobacco use. 42% of all chronic deaths globally are attributable to tobacco use.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Direct tobacco smoking is currently responsible for the death of about 5 million people worldwide each year with many deaths occuring prematurely. An additional 600,000 people are estimated to die from the effects of second-hand smoke.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In next 2 decades, the annual death from tobacco globally is expected to rise to over 8 million, with more than 80% of those deaths projected to occur in low-and middle-income countries.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; If effective measures are not urgently taken, tpbacco could in the 21st century kill over 1 billion people worldwide. Tobacco kills more than tuberculosis, HIV/ AIDS and malaria combined.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to the report titled [inside]The Growing Danger of Non-Communicable Diseases: Acting Now to Reverse Course (2011)[/inside], September, The World Bank, please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/The%20Growing%20Danger%20of%20Non-Communicable%20Diseases.pdf" title="The Growing Danger of Non-Communicable Diseases">click here</a> to access:</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> &bull; Heart disease, cancer, diabetes, chronic respiratory conditions, and other non-communicable diseases (NCDs) increasingly threaten the physical health and economic security of many lower-and middle-income countries.<br /> <br /> &bull; The change in mortality and disease levels will be particularly substantial in Sub-Saharan Africa, where NCDs will account for 46 percent of all deaths by 2030, up from 28 percent in 2008, and in South Asia, which will see the share of deaths from NCDs increase from 51 to 72 percent during the same period. More than 30 percent of these deaths will be premature and preventable. These lower-income countries will, at the same time, continue to grapple with the widespread prevalence of communicable diseases such as HIV, malaria, tuberculosis, and mother and child conditions, and so face a &ldquo;double burden&rdquo; of disease not experienced by their wealthier counterparts.<br /> <br /> &bull; The potential cost of NCDs to economies, health systems, households and individuals in middle- and lower-income countries is high. In many middle- and lower-income countries, NCDs are affecting populations at younger ages, resulting in longer periods of ill-health, premature deaths and greater loss of productivity that is so vital for development.<br /> <br /> &bull; Much of the rise in NCDs in developing countries is attributable to modifiable risk factors such as physical inactivity, malnutrition in the first thousand days of life and later an unhealthy diet (including excessive salt, fat, and sugar intake), tobacco use, alcohol abuse, and exposure to environmental pollution.<br /> <br /> &bull; Country evidence suggests that more than half of the NCD burden could be avoided through effective health promotion and disease prevention programs that tackle such risk factors. Particularly effective at very low costs are measures to curb tobacco, such as taxes, as indicated in the &ldquo;WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control&rdquo;, and to reduce salt in processed and semi processed foods.<br /> <br /> &bull; By 2030, cancer incidence is projected to increase by 70 percent in middle-income countries and 82 percent in lower-income countries.<br /> <br /> &bull; While increases in NCD-related mortality and ill-health in part reflect countries&rsquo; successes in extending lives and curbing communicable diseases, a significant part of the increase is a result of modifiable risk factors, many of which are linked to modernization, urbanization, and lifestyle changes.<br /> <br /> &bull; The rise of NCDs amongst younger populations may jeopardize many countries&rsquo; &ldquo;demographic dividend&rdquo;, including the economic benefits expected to be generated during the period when a relatively larger part of the population is of working age. Instead, these countries will have to contend with the costs associated with populations that are living with longer episodes of illhealth.<br /> <br /> &bull; Cardiovascular disease is already a major cause of death and disability in South Asia, where the average age of first-time heart attack sufferers is 53 compared to 59 in the rest of the world.<br /> <br /> &bull; A recent study illustrated the economic impact of NCDs in India by estimating that if NCDs were &ldquo;eliminated&rdquo;, the country&rsquo;s 2004 GDP would have been 4 to 10 percent greater.<br /> <br /> &bull; The share of out-of-pocket household health expenditures on NCDs in India increased from 32 percent to 47 percent between 1995&ndash;1996 and 2004. Moreover, 40 percent of these expenditures were financed by borrowing and sales of assets, increasing the household&rsquo;s financial vulnerability. NCDs also increase the risk of households incurring &ldquo;catastrophic&rdquo; health costs. In South Asia, the chance of incurring catastrophic hospitalization expenditures was 160 percent higher for cancer patients and 30 percent higher for those with cardiovascular diseases than it was for those with a communicable disease requiring hospitalization .<br /> <br /> &bull; Because of their specific characteristics, NCDs affect adults&mdash;often in their productive years, require costly long term treatment and care, and often are accompanied by some degree of disability. Therefore, they could potentially have greater socio-economic impact than other health conditions. Increased NCD levels can: reduce labor supply and outputs, increase costs to employers (from absenteeism and higher health care coverage costs), lower returns on human capital investments, reduced domestic consumption and lower tax revenues, as well as increased public health and social welfare expenditures.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to the report titled: [inside]AIDS at 30: Nations at the crossroads (2011)[/inside], which has been brought out by UNAIDS, please <a href="http://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/media_asset/aids-at-30_1.pdf">click here</a> to access:&nbsp;&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; The number of people living with HIV was around 34 million worldwide in 2010.<br /> <br /> &bull; There were 2.6 million new HIV infections worldwide in 2009.<br /> <br /> &bull; Between 1981 and 2000, the number of people living with HIV rose from less than one million to an estimated 27.5 million [26&ndash;29 million].<br /> <br /> &bull; Low- and middle-income countries accounted for 95% or more of the global HIV burden by 1998.<br /> <br /> &bull; While less than 1% of adults in South Africa were living with HIV in 1990, 16.1% were living with HIV a decade later. During the same period, adult HIV prevalence rose from less than 1% to 24.5% in Lesotho, and from 3.5% to 26% in Botswana.<br /> <br /> &bull; Half of HIV infections in Eastern Europe and Central Asia in 2010 were due to drug users sharing needles.<br /> <br /> &bull; Clinical trials show that male circumcision reduces the chance of men becoming HIV-positive by about 60%.<br /> <br /> &bull; Beginning in 2005, a series of randomized controlled trials in sub-Saharan Africa found that circumsising adult men reduced their risk of infection by about 60%.<br /> <br /> &bull; Scientific knowledge about HIV expanded steadily in the years 1981&ndash;2000. The virus was identified in 1983, and the first serologic test became available in 1985. In the 1990s, studies demonstrated in developed and low- and middle-income countries the possibility of significantly lowering the risk of vertical transmission.<br /> <br /> &bull; Today, 94% of countries (162 of 172 countries reporting) have national HIV strategic plans, up from 87% in 2006. The coordination of national responses also improved during the epidemic&rsquo;s third decade. Two out of three (67%) countries in 2010 reported having a single HIV monitoring and evaluation system, up from 46% in 2006, although country reports cite insufficient coordination of diverse partners as a continuing challenge to national responses.<br /> <br /> &bull; According to the latest UNGASS reports, AIDS expenditures in 2009 totalled US$ 1.07 billion. Estimates based on the methodology suggested by the Commission on AIDS in Asia indicate that US$ 3.3 billion is needed for a targeted response across the region.<br /> <br /> &bull; There was a significant increase in investment in the HIV response in low- and middle-income countries between 2001 and 2009, with total expenditure rising nearly 10-fold, from US$ 1.6 billion to US$ 15.9 billion.<br /> <br /> &bull; Public and private domestic resources accounted for 52% of total spending on HIV programmes in low- and middle-income countries in 2009, but many low-income countries remain heavily dependent on external financing. In 56 countries, international donors supply at least 70% of HIV resources. This pattern potentially encourages the emergence of new global inequities, as millions of people in sub-Saharan Africa now rely on external donors on a daily basis for the drugs and services that keep them alive.<br /> <br /> &bull; The UNAIDS Domestic Investment Priority Index, a formula that accounts for total HIV burden and government resources, shows that eight of 14 countries in West and Central Africa, six of 16 countries in Eastern and Southern Africa, and all but four countries in Asia were allocating inadequate resources to HIV in&nbsp; 2009.<br /> <br /> &bull; According to research from nine countries under the People Living with HIV Stigma Index, 53% of Rwandans living with HIV have been verbally insulted, 33% of rural Zambians living with HIV have experienced physical violence, and 65% of Rwandans living with HIV have lost a job or income opportunity. Furthermore, women living with HIV from various countries report abuses of their sexual and reproductive health and rights. Nearly 20% of women in Namibia who participated in discussions and interviews with the International Community of Women Living with HIV (ICW), reported that they had been coerced or forced into sterilization. Such deep-seated social ostracism and discriminatory actions discourage people from being tested for HIV or seeking other needed services.<br /> <br /> &bull; Among young women in South Africa, experience of intimate partner violence increases the odds of becoming infected with HIV by 11.9%, while gender inequality within a relationship increases the risk by 13.9%, according to a study reported in The Lancet in 2010.<br /> <br /> &bull; According to the UNAIDS Global Report 2010, the proportion of countries reporting programmes to address stigma and discrimination increased from 39% in 2006 to 92% in 2010, although a budget for these programmes was in place in less than half of these countries.<br /> <br /> &bull; More than 56 countries have laws that specifically criminalize HIV transmission or exposure, with the majority of prosecutions reported in high-income countries. As of April 2011, 47 countries, territories and areas imposed some form of restriction on the entry, stay and residence of people living with HIV. However, in a more positive development, China, Namibia and USA lifted their HIV-related travel restrictions in 2010, while Ecuador and India clarified that no such restrictions were in place.<br /> <br /> &bull; In 116 countries, territories and areas, some aspect of sex work is criminalized. Seventy-nine countries and territories worldwide criminalize consensual same-sex sexual relations, including 85% of countries in Eastern and Southern Africa, 81% in the Middle East and North Africa, and 69% in the Caribbean.<br /> <br /> &bull; Thirty-two countries have laws that allow for the death penalty for drug-related offences, and 27 provide for the compulsory detention of people who use drugs, often without due process or minimum standards of detention or treatment. Such laws, as well as abusive law enforcement and poor access to legal services, deter individuals from seeking needed services, increase their vulnerability to becoming HIV-positive, and intensify their social isolation.<br /> <br /> &bull; As of December 2010, an estimated 6.6 million people in low- and middle-income countries were receiving antiretroviral therapy, an increase of 1.4 million from a year earlier. Between 2001 and 2010, the number of people receiving antiretroviral treatment rose nearly 22-fold, a vivid illustration of the power of international solidarity, innovative approaches and people-centred responses.<br /> <br /> &bull; In sub-Saharan Africa the number of people receiving antiretroviral treatment in 2010 increased by 31%; in the Middle East and North Africa, that figure was 21%.<br /> <br /> &bull; As of December 2009, seven countries had already reached at least 80% of treatment-eligible individuals with antiretroviral treatment. Eighteen countries reported treatment coverage of at least 60%.<br /> <br /> &bull; Since its emergence in 1996, highly active anti retroviral therapy has saved an estimated 14.4 million life years worldwide as of December 2009. Although 54% of life-years saved between 1995 and 2009 were in Western Europe and North America, where antiretroviral therapy has long been available, 3.7 million life-years have been saved in sub-Saharan Africa. The pace of reducing morbidity and mortality in sub-Saharan Africa has accelerated since 2005 as a result of dramatic programme scale-up.<br /> <br /> &bull; In 2009, nearly one in five people (18%) who started antiretroviral therapy in low- and middle-income countries were no longer in care 12 months later.<br /> <br /> &bull; At present, more than 95% of patients on treatment are on first-generation antiretroviral medicines, the majority of which are off-patent. As drug resistance increases over time, more patients will require second- and third-generation medicines. Most of these more recent medicines will remain under patent protection for years to come, resulting in potentially drastic increases in treatment costs. This can be alleviated to a large extent by making use of the flexibilities of public health related TRIPS (trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights). In March 2011, UNAIDS, WHO and UNDP issued a policy brief calling on all countries to use TRIPS flexibilities to lower costs and improve access to HIV treatment. By 2005, five years after affordable means of preventing vertical transmission became available, only 15% of HIV-positive pregnant women in low- and middle-income countries received antiretroviral prophylaxis.<br /> <br /> &bull; More than 50% of pregnant women who tested positive for HIV in 2010 were assessed for their eligibility to receive antiretroviral therapy for their own health. These gains in reducing vertical transmission have helped to reduce childhood mortality. The number of children newly infected with HIV in 2009 (370 000 [230 000&ndash;510 000]) was 26% lower than in 2001.<br /> <br /> &bull; According to the most recent population-based surveys in low- and middle-income countries with available data, only 24% of young women and 36% of young men responded correctly when asked five questions about HIV prevention methods and popular misconceptions about HIV transmission. Young women tend to be less likely than young men to be aware of the prevention benefits of consistent condom use. When prompted, 74% of young males in DHS surveys knew that using a condom helps to prevent HIV infection, while only 49% of young females knew the right answer. Some 78% of young males also knew that having a single, faithful partner lowers the risk of HIV infection, compared to only 59% of young females.<br /> <br /> &bull; In 14 countries where HIV prevalence exceeds 2% and where nationally representative data are available, more than 70% of men and women who had high-risk sex in the past year report not using a condom the last time they had sex.<br /> <br /> &bull; Globally, HIV prevalence levels above those reported in the general population have been documented among men who have sex with men (MSM), transgender people, people who inject drugs (IDUs), and sex workers.<br /> <br /> &bull; According to the most recently available data, the proportion of countries reporting that they conduct systematic surveillance of HIV among key populations increased between 2008 and 2010: for sex workers, from 44% to 50%; for MSM, from 30% to 36%; while among IDUs it remained stable at 28%.<br /> <br /> &bull; An estimated 20% of the 15.9 million IDUs worldwide are living with HIV. This statistic underscores the world&rsquo;s failure to put the lessons of harm reduction to use. In at least 69 countries where injecting drug use has been documented, no programme to provide even sterile needles and syringes exists.<br /> <br /> &bull; The epidemic among MSM communities is a worldwide phenomenon, with 63 out of 67 countries reporting in 2009 a higher HIV prevalence among MSM compared with the general population.<br /> <br /> &bull; At least 79 countries, territories and areas have laws against male&ndash;male sexual contact, including some that authorize the death penalty.<br /> <br /> &bull; Among 56 countries reporting in both 2008 and 2010, median condom use with the most recent client reached 84%, with a range from about two thirds to nearly 100%.<br /> <br /> &bull; According to recent estimates, HIV is a leading cause of pregnancyrelated deaths, accounting for about 11% of all maternal deaths in 2008.<br /> <br /> &bull; HIV-positive newborns have about a 50% risk of death before age two in the absence of treatment.<br /> <br /> &bull; In 2009, HIV accounted for 2.1% (1.2&ndash;3.0%) of under-five deaths in low- and middle-income countries, a decline from 2.6% (1.6&ndash;3.5%) in 2000.<br /> <br /> &bull; In sub-Saharan Africa, HIV was responsible for 3.6% (2.0&ndash;5.0%) of all deaths in children under five in 2009. Here, too, striking achievements are evident, as the HIV share of all under-five deaths has sharply fallen from the 5.4% (3.3%&ndash;7.3%) reported in 2000.<br /> <br /> &bull; Universal access to effective prevention, diagnosis and treatment for HIV-related tuberculosis (TB) could prevent up to one million TB deaths in people living with HIV between now and 2015, but the world is falling far short of this target.<br /> <br /> &bull; Only 28% of TB patients globally knew their HIV status in 2009, and only 5% of people living with HIV were screened for TB. Although early initiation of antiretroviral therapy significantly reduces the risk of death among HIV-positive people with TB, only 37% of these HIV-positive TB patients got HIV therapy in 2009.<br /> <br /> &bull; According to data compiled by WHO, 10 countries accounted for more than 69% of all people with HIV-related TB in 2009.<br /> <br /> &bull; 25% of all TB deaths are in people with HIV, and there are one million cases of TB in people with HIV a year.<br /> <br /> &bull; Between 2001 and 2009, global HIV incidence steadily declined, with the annual rate of new infections falling by nearly 25%.<br /> <br /> &bull; Above-average declines in HIV incidence have occurred in sub-Saharan Africa and in South and South-East Asia, while Latin America and the Caribbean and Oceania regions experienced more modest reductions of less than 25%.<br /> <br /> &bull; Rates of new infections have remained relatively stable in East Asia, Western and Central Europe, and North America. HIV incidence has steadily increased in the Middle East and North Africa, while in Eastern Europe and Central Asia, a decline in new infections was reversed mid-decade, with incidence rising slightly from 2005 to 2009.<br /> <br /> &bull; Coverage of services to prevent new child infections increased from 15% in 2005 to 54% in 2009. The HIV incidence rate declined by more than 25% between 2001 and 2009. Antiretroviral treatment coverage is increasing.<br /> <br /> &bull; Some 22.5 million people now live with HIV in Africa. The majority (60%) are women and girls. HIV prevalence is as high as 25% in some countries, and the rate of people becoming newly infected outpaces treatment access. Of the 16.6 million children globally who have lost one or both parents to an AIDS-related illness, 14.9 million are in Africa.<br /> <br /> &bull; The Asia Pacific region has made significant progress in controlling HIV&rsquo;s spread. The number of people living with HIV has remained stable for the past five years and estimated new infections are 20% lower than in 2001. Thailand, Cambodia and certain parts of India have turned their epidemics around by providing quality services to their key populations at higher risk.<br /> <br /> &bull; In 2009, median reported prevention coverage for people who inject drugs was 17%; for men who have sex with men 36.5%; and for female sex workers 41%. Programmes in key affected populations to prevent transmission to intimate sexual partners are severely lacking.<br /> <br /> **page**<br /> &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Please <a href="https://im4change.org/hunger-hdi/sdgs-113.html?pgno=5#trends-in-maternal-mortality-1990-to-2008-estimates">click here</a> to access the Trends in Maternal Mortality: 1990 to 2008 Estimates developed by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA and The World Bank:</span><br /> &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">According to [inside]A Fair Chance at Life: Why Equity Matters for Children (2010)[/inside], which has been prepared by Save the Children, please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/A%20fair%20chance%20of%20life.pdf" title="A fair chance of life">click here</a> to access:</span><br /> <span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp; </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;In 2000, the world&rsquo;s governments committed themselves to make a two-thirds reduction in the child mortality rate by 2015 &ndash; the fourth of eight United Nations Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). But with five years to go before the target date, the world is collectively off track to reach MDG 4. Just 40% of the necessary progress has been achieved so far, and in three-quarters of countries the goal will be missed on current trends.&nbsp; </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The child mortality rate at a global level has fallen by just 28% since the MDG baseline year of 1990, far short of the 67% reduction required to meet the goal. Less than 30% of countries are making equitable progress towards MDG 4.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Ghana, Mozambique, Niger, Egypt, Indonesia, Bolivia and Zambia have made equitable progress in reducing child mortality. Chad, Congo, Kenya, South Africa and Zimbabwe have actually seen increases in their child mortality rates since 1990. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;In sub-Saharan Africa, close to one child in seven still dies before their fifth birthday. Although the mortality rate in sub-Saharan Africa has fallen, high fertility levels mean that the absolute number of child deaths in the region has increased since 1990, from 4.2 to 4.6 million.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Almost all child deaths &ndash; 99% &ndash; happen in the developing world. A person born in sub-Saharan Africa can expect to live, on average, 52 years. In western Europe, life expectancy is 80 years. The life expectancy rates in sub-Saharan Africa today have not been seen in Europe since the beginning of the 20th century. In 40 developing countries, children have less chance of living to the age of five than a person in the UK has of living to the age of 65.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Sri Lanka &ndash; with a per capita income of $1,790 &ndash; has a child mortality rate of 13, less than half the level in Guatemala, which has a per capita income of $2,680. Gabon has an equivalent per capita income to Argentina, but a child mortality rate of 57, almost four times higher.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;In India, high levels of selective abortion contribute to skewed male-to-female birth ratios. Son preference in India and China can result in high mortality among girls because they are not adequately breastfed or given the same access to medical treatment. A study of 4,000 children aged between one and two in India found that the likelihood of girls being fully vaccinated was five percentage points lower than that for boys. In Gujarat, India, 50% of women feel they need the permission of their husband or parent-in-law before taking their sick child to a doctor.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;High child mortality, illness and malnutrition can be a brake on economic and social development. Children who are sick and undernourished, especially in the first two years of life, often pay a life-long and irreversible price in terms of physical stunting and reduced cognitive ability.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;On the positive side, of the 68 &lsquo;Countdown to 2015&rsquo; countries (which together account for 97% of maternal and child deaths worldwide), 60 have reduced child mortality since 1990. A recent study found that the rate of reduction has accelerated since 2000, compared with the period from 1990 to 2000.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Of the 68 &lsquo;Countdown to 2015&rsquo; priority countries, only 19 are on-track to reach MDG 4. Eleven more are making faster-than-average progress, but still not enough progress to achieve MDG 4 by 2015.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;It is estimated that children under five make up 85% of those who die as a result of climate change; 44% of child deaths happen in countries considered fragile; and nearly 70% of the countries with the highest child mortality burden are currently experiencing or have experienced armed violence in the last two decades.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Inadequate care before birth and during delivery contributes to 40% of child deaths. Even babies who survive the neonatal period (up to 28 days) have greatly reduced chances of surviving beyond the age of five if their mothers die, in part because they are less likely to receive adequate nutrition and healthcare.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Although the percentage of stunted children decreased globally from 40% to 27% between 1990 and 2010, the number of stunted children is projected to increase in many areas. In Africa, the number of stunted children is estimated to have increased from 45 million in 1990 to 60 million in 2010.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Undernutrition among pregnant women in developing countries leads to one in six infants being born with low birth weight, which not only carries a high risk of neonatal death, but can also permanently damage long-term cognitive and physical development.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Infectious diseases accounted for an estimated 68% of the 8.8 million child deaths in 2008, with pneumonia accounting for 18% and diarrhoea for 15% of the global total. More than 40% of deaths from pneumonia and diarrhoea take place in sub-Saharan Africa, where 42% of people lack access to an improved water source, and almost 70% are without adequate sanitation.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Improved drinking water sources and proper sanitation are crucial to reducing child deaths from diarrhoea, while an estimated 45% of cases could be prevented by simple hand washing with soap.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;If women and men had equal status, it is estimated that the proportion of underweight children below the age of three years would fall by 13 percentage points globally.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">According to [inside]Women on the Front Lines of Health Care, State of the World&#39;s Mothers 2010[/inside], </span><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Women%20on%20the%20front%20line.pdf" title="Women on the front line">click here</a> to access</span><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">: </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Every year, 50 million women in the developing world give birth with no professional help and 8.8 million children and newborns die from easily preventable or treatable causes. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Worldwide, there are 57 countries with critical health workforce shortages, meaning that they have fewer than 23 doctors, nurses and midwives per 10,000 people. Thirty-six of these countries are in sub-Saharan Africa. Making up for these shortages would require an additional 2.4 million doctors, nurses and midwives.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Thirty-six of the countries with critical health worker shortages are in sub-Saharan Africa, which has 12 percent of the world&rsquo;s population, 25 percent of the global burden of disease, and only 3 percent of the world&rsquo;s health workers. South and East Asia have 29 percent of the disease burden and only 12 percent of the health workers.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;41 percent of the child deaths occur among newborn babies in the first month of life.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;99 percent of child and maternal deaths occur in developing countries where mothers and children lack access to basic health-care services.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;250,000 women&rsquo;s lives and 5.5 million children&rsquo;s lives could be saved each year if all women and children had access to a full package of essential health care.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Every year 8.8 million children die before reaching age 5.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Every year 343,000 women lose their lives due to pregnancy or childbirth complications.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;An additional 4.3 million health workers are needed in developing countries to help save lives and meet the health-related Millennium Development Goals.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The eleventh annual Mothers&rsquo; Index helps document conditions for mothers and children in 160 countries &ndash; 43 developed nations and 117 in the developing world &ndash; and shows where mothers fare best and where they face the greatest hardships.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;European countries &ndash; along with New Zealand and Australia &ndash; dominate the top positions while countries in sub-Saharan Africa dominate the lowest tier.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">According to [inside]Performance Audit-Report No. 8 of 2009-10[/inside], please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Performace%20Audit.pdf" title="Performance audit NRHM">click here</a> to access:</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;This is the latest and an extremely significant report on the status and performance of the National Rural Health Mission (NRHM) all over India providing clues for areas of concern and immediate action. Some of the salient features are as follows:</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The performance audit on implementation of the NRHM was conducted during April-December 2008 in the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, State Health Societies (SHS) of 33 States/UTs, District Health Societies (DHS) of 129 districts and 2369 health centres at block and village levels covering the period from 2005-06 to 2007-08.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The NRHM initiated decentralised bottom-up planning. This, however, had been hindered by non-completion of household and facility surveys and State specific perspective plans. In nine States, district level annual plans were not prepared during 2005-08 and in 24 States/UTs block and village level annual plans had not been prepared at all.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Village level health and sanitation committees were still to be constituted in nine States. The Rogi Kalyan Samitis (RKS) formed at many health centres, aiming at community ownership of healthcare delivery systems, were characterised by weak or absent grievance redressal mechanisms, outreach and awareness generation efforts.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;No RKS in any State/UT received all the stipulated central grants. In 13 States/UTs, the Samiti failed to generate internal resources, while in the remaining States no mechanism existed to monitor the generation of a third of the RKS funds from internal resources as prescribed.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The participation of Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs) in the Mission&rsquo;s activities had not been facilitated and their contribution towards capacity building and service delivery was not effectively monitored. 71 per cent of the districts countrywide were yet to be covered under the Mother NGO scheme.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;During the period 2005-06 to 2007-08, the total outlay/expenditure on the NRHM was Rs. 24,151.45 crore. During the first two years the Centre was contributing 100 per cent of the funds. Thereafter, the States were to contribute 15 per cent of funds during the 11th Five Year Plan (2007-12). However, many of the States were yet to contribute their share to the Mission and this issue needs to be addressed. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Many high focus States where diseases are endemic and health indicators poor, were however, receiving relatively lesser central grants, as high unspent balances of previous years remained, indicating that capacity building needs to be focused on.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Basic facilities (proper buildings, hygienic environment, electricity and water supply etc.) were still absent in many existing health centres with many Primary Health Centres (PHCs) and Community Health Centres (CHCs) being unable to provide guaranteed services such as inpatient services, operation theatres, labour rooms, pathological tests, X-ray facilities and emergency care etc.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;While contract workers have been engaged to fill vacancies, there are still shortages of specialist doctors at CHCs, adequate staff nurses at CHCs/PHCs and Auxiliary Nursing Midwife (ANMs)/ Multi-purpose Worker (MPWs) at Sub Centres.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;In nine States, the stock of essential drugs, contraceptives and vaccines adequate for two months consumption as required under norms were not available in any of the test checked PHCs and CHCs.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Despite holding two National Immunisation Days, six Special National Immunisation Days (and additional rounds in selected districts of Bihar and Uttar Pradesh), 1640 new polio cases had been detected in 17 States/UTs during 2005-08.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> <span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">According to [inside]&lsquo;Diarrhoea: Why children are still dying and what can be done?&rsquo; (2009)[/inside], please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Diarrhoea%20Why%20children%20are%20still%20dying%20and%20what%20can%20be%20done.pdf" title="Diarrhoea Why children are still dying and what can be done">click here</a> to access:</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Diarrhoea is defined as having loose or watery stools at least three times per day, or more frequently than normal for an individual. Though most episodes of childhood diarrhoea are mild, acute cases can lead to death and other complications. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The leading cause of diarrhea is lack of sanitation and safe drinking water and the life threatening disease is very easily curable with simple tablets and rehydration. (An estimated 88 per cent of diarrhoeal deaths worldwide are attributable to unsafe water, inadequate sanitation and poor hygiene.)</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Most pathogens that cause diarrhoea share a similar mode of transmission &ndash; from the stool of one person to the mouth of another.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;In India, under-five mortality rate (per 1000 live births) was 69 during 2008. The number of under-five deaths was 18,30,000 during 2008. The percentage of children under-five with diarrhoea receiving ORS packet during 2005-2008 was 26%.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Nearly, nine million children under five years of age die each year. Diarrhoea is second only to pneumonia as the cause of these deaths.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Reducing these deaths depends largely on delivering life-saving treatment of low-osmolarity oral rehydration salts (ORS) and zinc tablets to all children in need.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Examples of rehydrating fluids include cereal-based drinks made from a thin gruel of rice, maize, potato or other readily available low-cost grain or root crop the family has at home. Breastmilk is also an excellent drink for fluid replacement and should continue to be given to infants with diarrhoea simultaneously with other oral rehydration solutions.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;According to the latest available figures, an estimated 2.5 billion people lack improved sanitation facilities, and nearly one billion people do not have access to safe drinking water. These unsanitary environments allow diarrhoea-causing pathogens to spread more easily.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Globally, 1.2 billion people practise open defecation, 83 per cent of whom live in 13 countries</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Together, pneumonia and diarrhoea are responsible for an estimated 40 per cent of all child deaths around the world each year.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Nearly 1 in 4 people in developing countries were practising indiscriminate or open defecation in 2006.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Nearly one in five child deaths &ndash; about 1.5 million each year &ndash; is due to diarrhoea. It kills more young children than AIDS, malaria and measles combined.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Between 1990 and 2006, the proportion of the developing world&rsquo;s population using an improved drinking water source rose from 71 per cent to 84 per cent. Still, almost 1 billion people lack access to improved drinking water sources, and many households do not treat or safely store their household water supplies.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The prevention package highlights five main elements that require a concerted approach in their implementation. The package includes: a) rotavirus and measles vaccinations, b) promotion of early and exclusive breastfeeding and vitamin A supplementation, c) promotion of handwashing with soap, d) improved water supply quantity and quality, including treatment and safe storage of household water, and e) community-wide sanitation promotion.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Mortality from diarrhoea has declined over the past two decades from an estimated 5 million deaths among children under five to 1.5 million deaths in 2004 </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Africa and South Asia are home to more than 80 per cent of child deaths due to diarrhoea</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Improving sanitation facilities has been associated with an estimated median reduction in diarrhoea incidence of 36 per cent across reviewed studies.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Interventions to improve water quality at the source, along with treatment of household water and safe storage systems, have been shown to reduce diarrhoea incidence by as much as 47 per cent.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Diarrhoea often leads to stunting in children due to its association with poor nutrient absorption and appetite loss.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Breastmilk contains the nutrients, antioxidants, hormones and antibodies needed by a child to survive and develop.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Undernourished children are more likely to suffer from diarrhoea and its consequences, which, in turn, increases their chances of worsening nutritional status. Today, 129 million children under the age of five in the developing world are underweight for their age. Together, Africa and South Asia account for more than 80 per cent of total underweight children (25 per cent and 57 per cent, respectively). About 40 per cent of children under five years of age are stunted in Africa, and nearly half in South Asia.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Only 37 per cent of infants in developing countries are exclusively breastfed for the first six months of life.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Boys and girls are equally likely to receive ORS to treat diarrhoea. Children in urban areas (39 percent) are more likely to receive ORS than those living in rural areas (31 per cent). Similarly, children from the wealthiest families are 1.5 times as likely to receive ORS to treat their diarrhoea as the poorest children</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">**page**<em>&nbsp;</em></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">According to the [inside]World Health Statistics 2009[/inside], please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/World%20Health%20Statistics%202009.pdf" title="World Health Statistics 2009">click here</a> to access:</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp; </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The proportion of under-nourished children under five years of age declined from 27% in 1990 to 20% in 2005. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Some 27% fewer children died before their fifth birthday in 2007 than in 1990. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Maternal mortality has barely changed since 1990. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;One third of 9.7 million people in developing countries who need treatment for HIV/AIDS were receiving it in 2007. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;MDG target for reducing the incidence of tuberculosis was met globally in 2004. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;27 countries reported a reduction of up to 50% in the number of malaria cases between 1990 and 2006. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The number of people with access to safe drinking-water rose from 4.1 billion in 1990 to 5.7 billion in 2006. About 1.1 billion people in developing regions gained access to improved sanitation in the same period. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Globally, the proportion of children under five years of age suffering from under-nutrition, according to WHO Child Growth Standards, declined from 27% in 1990 to 20% in 2005. But, the progress is uneven, and an estimated 112 million children are underweight. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Globally, the number of children who die before their fifth birthday has been reduced by 27% from 12.5 million estimated in 1990 to 9 million in 2007. This reduction is due to a combination of interventions, including the use of insecticide-treated mosquito nets for malaria, oral rehydration therapy for diarrhoea, increased access to vaccines for a number of infectious diseases and improved water and sanitation. But pneumonia and diarrhoea continue to kill 3.8 million children aged under five each year, although both conditions are preventable and treatable.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The global maternal mortality ratio of 400 maternal deaths per 100 000 live births in 2005 has barely changed since 1990. Every year an estimated 536 000 women die in pregnancy or childbirth. Most of these deaths occur in sub-Saharan Africa where the maternal mortality ratio is 900 per 100 000 births and where there has been no measurable improvement since 1990. A woman in Africa may face a 1-in-26 lifetime risk of death during pregnancy and childbirth, compared with only 1 in 7300 in the developed regions. 1 There are, however, signs of progress in some countries in Asia and Latin America and the Caribbean.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The percentage of adults living with HIV worldwide has remained stable since 2000 but there were an estimated 2.7 million new infections during 2007. Moreover, deaths are increasing in parts of Africa, particularly eastern and southern Africa. The use of antiretroviral therapy has increased; in 2007, about 1 million more people living with HIV received the treatment. That means one third of the estimated 9.7 million people in developing countries who need the treatment were receiving it. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The MDG target for reducing the incidence of tuberculosis was met globally in 2004. Since then, incidence has continued to fall slowly. Thanks to early detection of new cases and effective treatment using the WHO-recommended DOTS treatment strategy, treatment success rates have been consistently improving, with rates rising from 79% in 1990 to 85% in 2006. Multi-drug resistant tuberculosis is a challenge in countries, such as those of the former Soviet Union, while the lethal combination of HIV and tuberculosis is an issue particularly for sub-Saharan African countries. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Efforts to control malaria are beginning to pay off with significant increases in the proportion of children sleeping under insecticide-treated mosquito nets. Although it is still too early to register the global impact, 27 countries &ndash; including five in Africa &ndash; have reported a reduction of up to 50% in malaria cases between 1990 and 2006. In 2006, the number of cases was estimated to be 250 million globally. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Progress has been made in treating neglected tropical diseases that affect some 1.2 billion people. For example, only 9585 cases of dracunculiasis (guinea-worm disease) were reported in the five countries where the disease is endemic, compared with an estimated 3.5 million reported in 20 such countries in 1985. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The number of people with access to safe drinking water rose from an estimated 4.1 billion in 1990 to 5.7 billion in 2006. But 900 million people still had to rely on water from what are known as unimproved sources, for example surface water or an unprotected dug well.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Since 1990, an estimated 1.1 billion people in developing regions have gained access to improved sanitation. In 1990, just under 3 billion people had access to sanitation. Their number rose to more than 4 billion by 2006. Yet, in 2006 some 2.5 billion did not have access to improved sanitation and 1.2 billion had to practise open defecation. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Although nearly all developing countries publish an essential medicines list, the availability of medicines at public health facilities is often poor. Surveys in about 30 developing countries show that availability of selected medicines at health facilities was only 35% in the public sector and 63% in the private sector. Lack of medicines in the public sector often means patients have no choice but to purchase them privately or do without treatment. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">According to [inside]National Family Health Survey-III (2005-06)[/inside], </span><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">please <a href="http://rchiips.org/NFHS/nfhs3.shtml" title="http://rchiips.org/NFHS/nfhs3.shtml">click here</a> to access:<br /> <br /> <u><strong>NFHS III reports declining status of nutrition amidst women</strong></u></span><br /> &nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">The NFHS III paints a mixed picture of India&rsquo;s overall reproductive health status. Women are having fewer children and infant mortality has dropped in the seven-year period since the last NFHS survey in 1998-99. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Anaemia and malnutrition are still widespread among children and adults. And, in an unusual juxtaposition, more adults, especially urban women, are overweight or obese than they were seven years ago. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> <span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:medium"><u><strong>Trend in Family Planning and Fertility</strong></u> </span></span><br /> &nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Fertility has continued to decline since NFHS-2, dropping to an average of 2.7 children from 2.9 children. Ten states, mostly in Southern India, have reached replacement level or below replacement level fertility. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">While son preference remains a barrier to more rapid decline in fertility, an increasing number of women who have only daughters say that they want no more children. In NFHS-3, 62% of women with two daughters and no sons say they want no more children, compared with 47% in NFHS-2. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Declining fertility could be attributed largely to women&rsquo;s increased use of contraception. For the first time ever, more than half of currently married women in India are using contraception, and their use of modern contraceptive methods increased from 43% to 49% between NFHS-2 and NFHS-3. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">A rise in the average age at marriage is also contributing to the drop in fertility. Forty-five percent of women ages 20-24 were married before the legal age of marriage of 18 years, compared with 50% seven years earlier. This shift in age at marriage also influences the median age at first birth, which increased by six months to 19.8 years. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> <span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:medium"><u><strong>Half of Women Lack Proper Care during Pregnancy and Delivery</strong></u></span></span><br /> &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;More than three-quarters of pregnant women in India received at least some antenatal care (ANC), but only half of women had at least three ANC visits with a health provider during their pregnancy. </span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull;&nbsp;The disparity between urban and rural women was especially pronounced, with 74% of urban women having ANC at least three times, compared with 43% of rural women. Births assisted by a health professional increased to 49% from 42%, with 75% of urban women but only 39% of rural women in NFHS-3 received assistance from a health professional.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull;&nbsp;Institutional births increased from 34% to 41%, but most women still deliver their children at home. Only about one-third of women received postnatal care within two days of delivery.<br /> <br /> <span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><u><strong>Infant Mortality Drops, but Full Immunization Coverage Shows Little Progress</strong></u></span></span></span></p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Infant mortality continues to decline, dropping from 68 in 1998-99 to 57 in 2005-06 per thousand births. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">There were particularly notable drops in the infant mortality rate in Bihar, Goa, Haryana, Jammu and Kashmir, Meghalaya, Orissa, Punjab, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, and Uttar Pradesh. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Overall, there was only a marginal improvement in full vaccination coverage, with 44% of children ages 12-23 months receiving all recommended vaccinations, up from 42% seven years earlier. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Substantial improvements in coverage have been made in all vaccinations except DPT, which did not change at all between NFHS-2 and NFHS-3. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Gains are particularly evident for polio vaccination coverage, but nearly one-quarter of children age 12-23 months did not receive three recommended doses. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Progress in vaccination coverage varies markedly among the states. In 11 states, there has been a substantial deterioration in full immunization coverage in the last seven years, due to a decline in vaccination coverage for both DPT and polio. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Large decline were seen in Maharashtra, Mizoram, Andhra Pradesh, and Punjab. On the other hand, there was major improvement in full immunization coverage in Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Sikkim, and West Bengal. Other states with marked improvements in full immunization coverage were Assam, Haryana, Jammu and Kashmir, Madhya Pradesh, Meghalaya, and Uttaranchal. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Diarrhoea continues to be a major health problem for many children.&nbsp; Although knowledge about Oral Rehydration Salts (ORS) for the treatment of diarrhoea is widespread among mothers, only 58% of children with diarrhoea were taken to a health facility, down from 65% seven years earlier. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">There has been a rise in the number of dispensaries and hospitals, nursing personnel and doctors (including primary health care centers) in between 1991 and 2005/06, as could be deciphered from the table below.</span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:medium"><u><strong>Trends in health care infrastructure</strong></u> </span></span></p> <div> <table align="justify" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" style="height:96px; width:417px"> <caption> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> </caption> <tbody> <tr> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp;</span></td> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:medium"><strong>1991 </strong></span></span></td> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:medium">&nbsp;<strong>2005/2006</strong></span></span></td> </tr> <tr> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp;SC/PHC/CHC (March 2006)</span></td> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp;57353</span></td> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp;171567</span></td> </tr> <tr> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp;Dispensaries and Hospitals (all) (1.4.2006)</span></td> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp;23555</span></td> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp;32156</span></td> </tr> <tr> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp;Nursing Personnel (2005)</span></td> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp;143887</span></td> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp;1481270</span></td> </tr> <tr> </tr> </tbody> </table> </div> ', 'credit_writer' => '', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 10, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'public-health-51', 'meta_title' => '', 'meta_keywords' => '', 'meta_description' => '', 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 51, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 21 $metaTitle = 'Hunger / HDI | Public Health' $metaKeywords = '' $metaDesc = 'KEY TRENDS&nbsp; &nbsp; &bull; The 2019&nbsp;India&nbsp;TB&nbsp;report&nbsp;says&nbsp;that the&nbsp;country&nbsp;accounted for a quarter of the global tuberculosis (TB) burden with an estimated 27 lakh cases in 2018. In 2018, the country was able to achieve a total notification of 21.5 lakh TB cases, of which...' $disp = '<p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">KEY TRENDS&nbsp;</span></p><p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p><div style="text-align:justify">&bull; The 2019&nbsp;India&nbsp;TB&nbsp;report&nbsp;says&nbsp;that the&nbsp;country&nbsp;accounted for a quarter of the global tuberculosis (TB) burden with an estimated 27 lakh cases in 2018. In 2018, the country was able to achieve a total notification of 21.5 lakh TB cases, of which 25 percent was from private sector. Majority of the TB burden is among the working age group. Nearly 89 percent of TB cases came from the age group 15-69 years. About 2/3rd of the TB patients were males <strong>*15</strong></div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify">&bull; Maternal Mortality Ratio for India was 370 in 2000, 286 in 2005, 210 in&nbsp; 2010, 158 in 2015 and 145 in 2017. Therefore, the MMRatio for the country reduced by almost 61 percent between 2000 and 2017. MMRatio for China was 59 in 2000, 44 in 2005, 36 in 2010, 30 in 2015 and 29 in 2017. Therefore, the MMRatio for China fell by around 51 percent between 2000 and 2017 <strong>*14</strong> &nbsp;<br />&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify">&bull; The per capita public expenditure (actual) on health in nominal terms has gone up from Rs. 621 in 2009-10 to Rs. 1,112 in 2015-16. Public expenditure on health (includes health sector expenditure by Centre and States/UTs) as a percentage of GDP was 1.02 percent in 2015-16. There is no significant change in public expenditure on health as a percentage of GDP since 2009-10. The Centre-State share in total public expenditure on health was 31:69 in 2015-16, which used to be 36:64 in 2009-10 <strong>*13</strong><br /><br />&bull; The North-Eastern states had the highest (viz. Rs. 2,878 per capita) and Empowered Action Group (EAG) states (including Assam) had the lowest (viz. Rs. 871 per capita) average per capita public expenditure on health in 2015-16 (excluding UTs). The North-Eastern states had the highest public health expenditure as a percentage of Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP) in 2015-16 (2.76 percent). Public health expenditure as a percentage of GSDP stood at 1.36 percent for EAG states (including Assam) and 0.76 percent for major non-EAG states <strong>*13</strong></div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify">&bull; Of the total disease burden in India in 1990, a tenth was caused by a group of risks including unhealthy diet, high blood pressure, high blood sugar, high cholesterol, and overweight, which mainly contribute to ischaemic heart disease, stroke, and diabetes. The contribution of this group of risks increased massively to a quarter of the total disease burden in India in 2016 <strong>*12</strong><br /><br />&bull; The Out-of-Pocket Expenditure (OOPE) on health by households is Rs. 3,02,425 crores (62.6 percent of total health expenditure, 2.4 percent of GDP, Rs. 2,394 per capita) for the year 2014-15. Private Health Insurance expenditure is Rs. 17,755 crores (3.7 percent of total health expenditure) for the year 2014-15 <strong>*11</strong><br /><br />&bull; Based on available evidence, cardiovascular disease (24 percent), chronic respiratory disease (11 percent), cancer (6 percent) and diabetes (2 percent) are the leading cause of mortality in India <strong>*10</strong><br />&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify">&bull; The total number of dengue cases in India has grown from 28,292 in 2010 to 40,425 in 2014. The total number of dengue related deaths stood at 131 in 2014 <strong>*10</strong></div><div style="text-align:justify"><br />&bull; The Proportion (per 1000) of Ailing Persons (PAP), measured as the number of living persons reporting ailments (per 1000 persons), was 89 persons in rural India and 118 persons in urban India <strong>*9</strong><br />&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify">&bull; Private doctors were the most important single source of non-hospitalized treatment in both the sectors (Rural &amp; Urban). More than 70% (72 per cent in the rural areas and 79 per cent in the urban areas) spells of ailment were treated in the private sector (consisting of private doctors, nursing homes, private hospitals, charitable institutions, etc.) <strong>*9</strong></div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify">&bull; It is observed that in rural India, 42 percent hospitalised treatment was carried out in public hospital and rest 58 percent in private hospital. For the urban India, the corresponding figures were 32 percent and 68 percent. It may be noted in this context that households (or persons within households) were segregated in sector (rural/urban) by their place of domicile, and not by the place of treatment <strong>*9</strong></div><p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p><div style="text-align:justify">&bull; Average medical expenditure per hospitalisation case: Higher amount was spent for treatment per hospitalised case by people in the private hospitals (Rs. 25850) than in the public hospitals (Rs. 6120). The highest expenditure was recorded for treatment of Cancer (Rs. 56712) followed by that for Cardio-vascular diseases (Rs. 31647). Average medical expenditure per non-hospitalisation case was Rs. 509 in rural India and Rs. 639 in urban India <strong>*9</strong><br /><br />&bull; As much as 86 percent of rural population and 82 percent of urban population were still not covered under any scheme of health expenditure support. Government, however, was able to bring about 12 percent urban and 13 percent rural population under health protection coverage through Rastriya Swasthya Bima Yojana (RSBY) or similar plan. Only 12 percent households of the 5th quintile class (Usual Monthly Per Capita Consumer Expenditure) of urban area had some arrangement of medical insurance from private provider <strong>*9</strong></div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify">&bull; The draft National Health Policy 2015 proposes a potentially achievable target of raising public health expenditure to 2.5% of the GDP. It also notes that 40% of this would need to come from Central expenditures. At current prices, a target of 2.5% of GDP translates to Rs. 3800 per capita, representing an almost four fold increase in five years <strong>*8</strong><br />&nbsp;<br />&bull; Maternal mortality ratio (MMR)* in India stood at 560 maternal deaths (per 100000 live births) during 1990, 460 during 1995, 370 during 2000, 280 during 2005 and 190 during 2013. India could reduce MMR by 65 percent between 1990 and 2013<strong> *7</strong><br /><br />&bull; At the country level, the two countries that accounted for one third of all global maternal deaths are India at 17 percent (50000) and Nigeria at 14 percent (40000)<strong> *7</strong><br /><br />&bull; U5MR in India declined by 55 percent from 126 in 1990 to 56 in 2012. Infant Mortality Rate declined from 88 in 1990 to 44 in 2012. Neonatal mortality rate declined from 51 in 1990 to 31 in 2012. U5MR in India among boys declined from 121 in 1990 to 54 in 2012. U5MR in India among girls declined from 130 in 1990 to 59 in 2012. The share of neonatal deaths in under-five deaths stood at 55 percent in 2012 as compared to 41 percent in 1990 <strong>*6</strong><br /><br />&bull; Pneumonia is the leading cause of child mortality in India, responsible for the deaths of nearly 400,000 children under five in 2010 <strong>*5</strong><br /><br />&bull; The Indian Commission on Macroeconomics and Health notes that, in India, 13 household person-days per patient were lost per episode of malaria. Furthermore, the commission estimated that the overall monetary losses to families (income losses together with treatment expenses) could amount to between 200 and 400 Indian rupees (US$ 3.5 to 7) <strong>*4</strong><br /><br />&bull; Odisha is one of the most highly malaria-endemic states in India, accounting for 24% of reported cases in 2010 despite consisting of less of than 4% of the national population. Malaria is particularly common among tribal groups which represent 44% of the population of Orissa <strong>*4</strong><br /><br />&bull; Globally 12% of all deaths among adults aged 30 years and over were attributed to tobacco as compared with 16% in India, 17% in Pakistan and 31% in Bangladesh <strong>*3</strong><br /><br />&bull; A recent study illustrated the economic impact of Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs) in India by estimating that if NCDs like: heart disease, cancer, diabetes, chronic respiratory conditions, and other NCDs were &ldquo;eliminated&rdquo;, the country&rsquo;s 2004 GDP would have been 4 to 10 percent greater<strong> *2</strong><br /><br />&bull; The share of out-of-pocket household health expenditures on NCDs in India increased from 32 percent to 47 percent between 1995&ndash;1996 and 2004. Moreover, 40 percent of these expenditures were financed by borrowing and sales of assets, increasing the household&rsquo;s financial vulnerability<strong> *2</strong><br /><br />&bull; In NFHS-III, 62% of women with two daughters and no sons say they want no more children, compared with 47% in NFHS-II<strong> *1</strong></div><div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>15.</strong> 2019 India TB report, released in 2019, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, please <a href="https://tbcindia.gov.in/WriteReadData/India%20TB%20Report%202019.pdf" title="https://tbcindia.gov.in/WriteReadData/India%20TB%20Report%202019.pdf">click here</a> and <a href="https://tbcindia.gov.in/index1.php?lang=1&amp;level=1&amp;sublinkid=4160&amp;lid=2807" title="https://tbcindia.gov.in/index1.php?lang=1&amp;level=1&amp;sublinkid=4160&amp;lid=2807">click here</a> to access</div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>14.</strong> Trends in Maternal Mortality 2000 to 2017: Estimates by World Health Orgnization (WHO), United Nations Children&#39;s Fund (UNICEF), World Bank Group, United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) and the United Nations Population Division (released in September 2019), please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Maternal%20mortality%20Levels%20and%20trends%202000%20to%202017%20Executive%20Summary.pdf" title="Maternal mortality Levels and trends 2000 to 2017 Executive Summary" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Maternal%20mortality%20Levels%20and%20trends%202000%20to%202017%20Executive%20Summary.pdf" title="Maternal mortality Levels and trends 2000 to 2017 Executive Summary">click here</a> and <a href="https://www.unfpa.org/featured-publication/trends-maternal-mortality-2000-2017" title="https://www.unfpa.org/featured-publication/trends-maternal-mortality-2000-2017">click here</a> to access</div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>13</strong>. National Health Profile 2018, 13th Issue, Central Bureau of Health Intelligence, Ministry of Health &amp; Family Welfare, please <a href="https://im4change.org/docs/900National%20Health%20Profile%202018%2013th%20Issue%20Central%20Bureau%20of%20Health%20Intelligence%20Ministry%20of%20Health%20&amp;%20Family%20Welfare.pdf" title="https://im4change.org/docs/900National%20Health%20Profile%202018%2013th%20Issue%20Central%20Bureau%20of%20Health%20Intelligence%20Ministry%20of%20Health%20&amp;%20Family%20Welfare.pdf">click here</a> to access&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>12. </strong>India: Health of the Nation&rsquo;s States - The India State-Level Disease Burden Initiative, Disease Burden Trends in the States of India 1990 to 2016 (released in October, 2017), prepared by Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), Public Health Foundation of India (PHFI), Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) and Ministry of Health &amp; Family Welfare (MoHFW), please <a href="https://im4change.org/docs/11592India_Health_of.pdf" title="https://im4change.org/docs/11592India_Health_of.pdf">click here</a> to access</div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>11</strong>. National Health Accounts: Estimates for India 2014-15 (released in October, 2017), prepared by the National Health Accounts Technical Secretariat, National Health Systems Resource Centre and Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/National%20Health%20Accounts%20Estimates%20Report%202014-15.pdf" title="National Health Accounts Estimates for India 2014-15" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/National%20Health%20Accounts%20Estimates%20Report%202014-15.pdf" title="National Health Accounts Estimates for India 2014-15">click here</a> to access</div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>10</strong>. National Health Profile 2015, Central Bureau of Health Intelligence, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (please <a href="http://www.cbhidghs.nic.in/E-Book%20HTML-2015/index.html" title="http://www.cbhidghs.nic.in/E-Book%20HTML-2015/index.html">click here</a> to access)</div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>9</strong>. 71st round NSS report: Key Indicators of Social Consumption in India-Health (published in June 2015), please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/nss_71st_ki_health_30june15.pdf" title="NSS 71st Round Health" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/nss_71st_ki_health_30june15.pdf" title="NSS 71st Round Health">click here</a> to access the full report; please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/NSS%20Press%20Release%20Health.pdf" title="NSS Press Note Health" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/NSS%20Press%20Release%20Health.pdf" title="NSS Press Note Health">click here</a> to read the summary of findings</div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>8</strong>. Draft National Health Policy 2015 (published in December 2014), Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (Please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Draft%20National%20Health%20Policy%202015.pdf" title="Draft NHP 2015" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Draft%20National%20Health%20Policy%202015.pdf" title="Draft NHP 2015">click here</a> to download)</div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>7</strong>. United Nations&#39; report (released in May, 2014) entitled Trends in maternal mortality estimates 1990 to 2013,&nbsp;</span>(please&nbsp;<a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Trends%20in%20Maternal%20Mortality%201990%20to%202013.pdf" title="Trends in Maternal Mortality 1990 to 2013" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Trends%20in%20Maternal%20Mortality%201990%20to%202013.pdf" title="Trends in Maternal Mortality 1990 to 2013">click here</a>&nbsp;to download)</div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><strong>6. </strong><a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/APR_Progress_Report_2013_9_Sept_2013_1.pdf" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/APR_Progress_Report_2013_9_Sept_2013_1.pdf">Committing to Child Survival</a>: A Promise Renewed Progress Report 2013, UNICEF </span></span></p></div><p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>5</strong>. Pneumonia Progress Report, 2012, released by IVAC and John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012.pdf" title="Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012.pdf" title="Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012">click here</a> to access</span></p><p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p><div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>4</strong>. Defeating malaria in Asia, the Pacific, Americas, Middle East and Europe (2012), World Health Organization and PATH,&nbsp;</span></div><p style="text-align:justify"><a href="http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Defeating%20malaria.pdf" title="http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Defeating%20malaria.pdf">http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Defeat<br />ing%20malaria.pdf</a></p><p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>3</strong>. WHO Global Report: Mortality Attributable to Tobacco (2012), please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/WHO%20report%20on%20Tobacco.pdf" title="WHO " title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/WHO%20report%20on%20Tobacco.pdf" title="WHO ">click here</a> to access&nbsp;&nbsp;</span></p><p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>2</strong>. The Growing Danger of Non-Communicable Diseases: Acting Now to Reverse Course, September, 2011, The World Bank, please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/WBDeepeningCrisis.pdf" title="WBDeepeningCrisis" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/WBDeepeningCrisis.pdf" title="WBDeepeningCrisis">click here</a> to access</span></p><p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>1</strong>. National Family Health Survey III (2005-06), please <a href="http://rchiips.org/NFHS/nfhs3.shtml" title="http://rchiips.org/NFHS/nfhs3.shtml">click here</a> to access &nbsp;</span></p><p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:justify">' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>hunger-hdi/public-health-51.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>Hunger / HDI | Public Health | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content="KEY TRENDS • The 2019 India TB report says that the country accounted for a quarter of the global tuberculosis (TB) burden with an estimated 27 lakh cases in 2018. In 2018, the country was able to achieve a total notification of 21.5 lakh TB cases, of which..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Public Health</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">KEY TRENDS </span></p><p style="text-align:justify"> </p><div style="text-align:justify">• The 2019 India TB report says that the country accounted for a quarter of the global tuberculosis (TB) burden with an estimated 27 lakh cases in 2018. In 2018, the country was able to achieve a total notification of 21.5 lakh TB cases, of which 25 percent was from private sector. Majority of the TB burden is among the working age group. Nearly 89 percent of TB cases came from the age group 15-69 years. About 2/3rd of the TB patients were males <strong>*15</strong></div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><div style="text-align:justify">• Maternal Mortality Ratio for India was 370 in 2000, 286 in 2005, 210 in 2010, 158 in 2015 and 145 in 2017. Therefore, the MMRatio for the country reduced by almost 61 percent between 2000 and 2017. MMRatio for China was 59 in 2000, 44 in 2005, 36 in 2010, 30 in 2015 and 29 in 2017. Therefore, the MMRatio for China fell by around 51 percent between 2000 and 2017 <strong>*14</strong> <br /> </div><div style="text-align:justify">• The per capita public expenditure (actual) on health in nominal terms has gone up from Rs. 621 in 2009-10 to Rs. 1,112 in 2015-16. Public expenditure on health (includes health sector expenditure by Centre and States/UTs) as a percentage of GDP was 1.02 percent in 2015-16. There is no significant change in public expenditure on health as a percentage of GDP since 2009-10. The Centre-State share in total public expenditure on health was 31:69 in 2015-16, which used to be 36:64 in 2009-10 <strong>*13</strong><br /><br />• The North-Eastern states had the highest (viz. Rs. 2,878 per capita) and Empowered Action Group (EAG) states (including Assam) had the lowest (viz. Rs. 871 per capita) average per capita public expenditure on health in 2015-16 (excluding UTs). The North-Eastern states had the highest public health expenditure as a percentage of Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP) in 2015-16 (2.76 percent). Public health expenditure as a percentage of GSDP stood at 1.36 percent for EAG states (including Assam) and 0.76 percent for major non-EAG states <strong>*13</strong></div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><div style="text-align:justify">• Of the total disease burden in India in 1990, a tenth was caused by a group of risks including unhealthy diet, high blood pressure, high blood sugar, high cholesterol, and overweight, which mainly contribute to ischaemic heart disease, stroke, and diabetes. The contribution of this group of risks increased massively to a quarter of the total disease burden in India in 2016 <strong>*12</strong><br /><br />• The Out-of-Pocket Expenditure (OOPE) on health by households is Rs. 3,02,425 crores (62.6 percent of total health expenditure, 2.4 percent of GDP, Rs. 2,394 per capita) for the year 2014-15. Private Health Insurance expenditure is Rs. 17,755 crores (3.7 percent of total health expenditure) for the year 2014-15 <strong>*11</strong><br /><br />• Based on available evidence, cardiovascular disease (24 percent), chronic respiratory disease (11 percent), cancer (6 percent) and diabetes (2 percent) are the leading cause of mortality in India <strong>*10</strong><br /> </div><div style="text-align:justify">• The total number of dengue cases in India has grown from 28,292 in 2010 to 40,425 in 2014. The total number of dengue related deaths stood at 131 in 2014 <strong>*10</strong></div><div style="text-align:justify"><br />• The Proportion (per 1000) of Ailing Persons (PAP), measured as the number of living persons reporting ailments (per 1000 persons), was 89 persons in rural India and 118 persons in urban India <strong>*9</strong><br /> </div><div style="text-align:justify">• Private doctors were the most important single source of non-hospitalized treatment in both the sectors (Rural & Urban). More than 70% (72 per cent in the rural areas and 79 per cent in the urban areas) spells of ailment were treated in the private sector (consisting of private doctors, nursing homes, private hospitals, charitable institutions, etc.) <strong>*9</strong></div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><div style="text-align:justify">• It is observed that in rural India, 42 percent hospitalised treatment was carried out in public hospital and rest 58 percent in private hospital. For the urban India, the corresponding figures were 32 percent and 68 percent. It may be noted in this context that households (or persons within households) were segregated in sector (rural/urban) by their place of domicile, and not by the place of treatment <strong>*9</strong></div><p style="text-align:justify"> </p><div style="text-align:justify">• Average medical expenditure per hospitalisation case: Higher amount was spent for treatment per hospitalised case by people in the private hospitals (Rs. 25850) than in the public hospitals (Rs. 6120). The highest expenditure was recorded for treatment of Cancer (Rs. 56712) followed by that for Cardio-vascular diseases (Rs. 31647). Average medical expenditure per non-hospitalisation case was Rs. 509 in rural India and Rs. 639 in urban India <strong>*9</strong><br /><br />• As much as 86 percent of rural population and 82 percent of urban population were still not covered under any scheme of health expenditure support. Government, however, was able to bring about 12 percent urban and 13 percent rural population under health protection coverage through Rastriya Swasthya Bima Yojana (RSBY) or similar plan. Only 12 percent households of the 5th quintile class (Usual Monthly Per Capita Consumer Expenditure) of urban area had some arrangement of medical insurance from private provider <strong>*9</strong></div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><div style="text-align:justify">• The draft National Health Policy 2015 proposes a potentially achievable target of raising public health expenditure to 2.5% of the GDP. It also notes that 40% of this would need to come from Central expenditures. At current prices, a target of 2.5% of GDP translates to Rs. 3800 per capita, representing an almost four fold increase in five years <strong>*8</strong><br /> <br />• Maternal mortality ratio (MMR)* in India stood at 560 maternal deaths (per 100000 live births) during 1990, 460 during 1995, 370 during 2000, 280 during 2005 and 190 during 2013. India could reduce MMR by 65 percent between 1990 and 2013<strong> *7</strong><br /><br />• At the country level, the two countries that accounted for one third of all global maternal deaths are India at 17 percent (50000) and Nigeria at 14 percent (40000)<strong> *7</strong><br /><br />• U5MR in India declined by 55 percent from 126 in 1990 to 56 in 2012. Infant Mortality Rate declined from 88 in 1990 to 44 in 2012. Neonatal mortality rate declined from 51 in 1990 to 31 in 2012. U5MR in India among boys declined from 121 in 1990 to 54 in 2012. U5MR in India among girls declined from 130 in 1990 to 59 in 2012. The share of neonatal deaths in under-five deaths stood at 55 percent in 2012 as compared to 41 percent in 1990 <strong>*6</strong><br /><br />• Pneumonia is the leading cause of child mortality in India, responsible for the deaths of nearly 400,000 children under five in 2010 <strong>*5</strong><br /><br />• The Indian Commission on Macroeconomics and Health notes that, in India, 13 household person-days per patient were lost per episode of malaria. Furthermore, the commission estimated that the overall monetary losses to families (income losses together with treatment expenses) could amount to between 200 and 400 Indian rupees (US$ 3.5 to 7) <strong>*4</strong><br /><br />• Odisha is one of the most highly malaria-endemic states in India, accounting for 24% of reported cases in 2010 despite consisting of less of than 4% of the national population. Malaria is particularly common among tribal groups which represent 44% of the population of Orissa <strong>*4</strong><br /><br />• Globally 12% of all deaths among adults aged 30 years and over were attributed to tobacco as compared with 16% in India, 17% in Pakistan and 31% in Bangladesh <strong>*3</strong><br /><br />• A recent study illustrated the economic impact of Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs) in India by estimating that if NCDs like: heart disease, cancer, diabetes, chronic respiratory conditions, and other NCDs were “eliminated”, the country’s 2004 GDP would have been 4 to 10 percent greater<strong> *2</strong><br /><br />• The share of out-of-pocket household health expenditures on NCDs in India increased from 32 percent to 47 percent between 1995–1996 and 2004. Moreover, 40 percent of these expenditures were financed by borrowing and sales of assets, increasing the household’s financial vulnerability<strong> *2</strong><br /><br />• In NFHS-III, 62% of women with two daughters and no sons say they want no more children, compared with 47% in NFHS-II<strong> *1</strong></div><div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>15.</strong> 2019 India TB report, released in 2019, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, please <a href="https://tbcindia.gov.in/WriteReadData/India%20TB%20Report%202019.pdf" title="https://tbcindia.gov.in/WriteReadData/India%20TB%20Report%202019.pdf">click here</a> and <a href="https://tbcindia.gov.in/index1.php?lang=1&level=1&sublinkid=4160&lid=2807" title="https://tbcindia.gov.in/index1.php?lang=1&level=1&sublinkid=4160&lid=2807">click here</a> to access</div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>14.</strong> Trends in Maternal Mortality 2000 to 2017: Estimates by World Health Orgnization (WHO), United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF), World Bank Group, United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) and the United Nations Population Division (released in September 2019), please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Maternal%20mortality%20Levels%20and%20trends%202000%20to%202017%20Executive%20Summary.pdf" title="Maternal mortality Levels and trends 2000 to 2017 Executive Summary" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Maternal%20mortality%20Levels%20and%20trends%202000%20to%202017%20Executive%20Summary.pdf" title="Maternal mortality Levels and trends 2000 to 2017 Executive Summary">click here</a> and <a href="https://www.unfpa.org/featured-publication/trends-maternal-mortality-2000-2017" title="https://www.unfpa.org/featured-publication/trends-maternal-mortality-2000-2017">click here</a> to access</div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>13</strong>. National Health Profile 2018, 13th Issue, Central Bureau of Health Intelligence, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, please <a href="https://im4change.org/docs/900National%20Health%20Profile%202018%2013th%20Issue%20Central%20Bureau%20of%20Health%20Intelligence%20Ministry%20of%20Health%20&%20Family%20Welfare.pdf" title="https://im4change.org/docs/900National%20Health%20Profile%202018%2013th%20Issue%20Central%20Bureau%20of%20Health%20Intelligence%20Ministry%20of%20Health%20&%20Family%20Welfare.pdf">click here</a> to access </div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>12. </strong>India: Health of the Nation’s States - The India State-Level Disease Burden Initiative, Disease Burden Trends in the States of India 1990 to 2016 (released in October, 2017), prepared by Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), Public Health Foundation of India (PHFI), Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) and Ministry of Health & Family Welfare (MoHFW), please <a href="https://im4change.org/docs/11592India_Health_of.pdf" title="https://im4change.org/docs/11592India_Health_of.pdf">click here</a> to access</div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>11</strong>. National Health Accounts: Estimates for India 2014-15 (released in October, 2017), prepared by the National Health Accounts Technical Secretariat, National Health Systems Resource Centre and Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/National%20Health%20Accounts%20Estimates%20Report%202014-15.pdf" title="National Health Accounts Estimates for India 2014-15" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/National%20Health%20Accounts%20Estimates%20Report%202014-15.pdf" title="National Health Accounts Estimates for India 2014-15">click here</a> to access</div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>10</strong>. National Health Profile 2015, Central Bureau of Health Intelligence, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (please <a href="http://www.cbhidghs.nic.in/E-Book%20HTML-2015/index.html" title="http://www.cbhidghs.nic.in/E-Book%20HTML-2015/index.html">click here</a> to access)</div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>9</strong>. 71st round NSS report: Key Indicators of Social Consumption in India-Health (published in June 2015), please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/nss_71st_ki_health_30june15.pdf" title="NSS 71st Round Health" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/nss_71st_ki_health_30june15.pdf" title="NSS 71st Round Health">click here</a> to access the full report; please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/NSS%20Press%20Release%20Health.pdf" title="NSS Press Note Health" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/NSS%20Press%20Release%20Health.pdf" title="NSS Press Note Health">click here</a> to read the summary of findings</div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>8</strong>. Draft National Health Policy 2015 (published in December 2014), Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (Please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Draft%20National%20Health%20Policy%202015.pdf" title="Draft NHP 2015" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Draft%20National%20Health%20Policy%202015.pdf" title="Draft NHP 2015">click here</a> to download)</div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>7</strong>. United Nations' report (released in May, 2014) entitled Trends in maternal mortality estimates 1990 to 2013, </span>(please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Trends%20in%20Maternal%20Mortality%201990%20to%202013.pdf" title="Trends in Maternal Mortality 1990 to 2013" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Trends%20in%20Maternal%20Mortality%201990%20to%202013.pdf" title="Trends in Maternal Mortality 1990 to 2013">click here</a> to download)</div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><strong>6. </strong><a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/APR_Progress_Report_2013_9_Sept_2013_1.pdf" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/APR_Progress_Report_2013_9_Sept_2013_1.pdf">Committing to Child Survival</a>: A Promise Renewed Progress Report 2013, UNICEF </span></span></p></div><p style="text-align:justify"> </p><p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>5</strong>. Pneumonia Progress Report, 2012, released by IVAC and John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012.pdf" title="Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012.pdf" title="Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012">click here</a> to access</span></p><p style="text-align:justify"> </p><div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>4</strong>. Defeating malaria in Asia, the Pacific, Americas, Middle East and Europe (2012), World Health Organization and PATH, </span></div><p style="text-align:justify"><a href="http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Defeating%20malaria.pdf" title="http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Defeating%20malaria.pdf">http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Defeat<br />ing%20malaria.pdf</a></p><p style="text-align:justify"> </p><p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>3</strong>. WHO Global Report: Mortality Attributable to Tobacco (2012), please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/WHO%20report%20on%20Tobacco.pdf" title="WHO " title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/WHO%20report%20on%20Tobacco.pdf" title="WHO ">click here</a> to access </span></p><p style="text-align:justify"> </p><p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>2</strong>. The Growing Danger of Non-Communicable Diseases: Acting Now to Reverse Course, September, 2011, The World Bank, please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/WBDeepeningCrisis.pdf" title="WBDeepeningCrisis" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/WBDeepeningCrisis.pdf" title="WBDeepeningCrisis">click here</a> to access</span></p><p style="text-align:justify"> </p><p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>1</strong>. National Family Health Survey III (2005-06), please <a href="http://rchiips.org/NFHS/nfhs3.shtml" title="http://rchiips.org/NFHS/nfhs3.shtml">click here</a> to access </span></p><p style="text-align:justify"> </p><p style="text-align:justify"> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681e4619ea796-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681e4619ea796-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr681e4619ea796-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681e4619ea796-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681e4619ea796-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681e4619ea796-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681e4619ea796-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr681e4619ea796-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr681e4619ea796-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 21, 'title' => 'Public Health', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">KEY TRENDS&nbsp;</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <div style="text-align:justify">&bull; The 2019&nbsp;India&nbsp;TB&nbsp;report&nbsp;says&nbsp;that the&nbsp;country&nbsp;accounted for a quarter of the global tuberculosis (TB) burden with an estimated 27 lakh cases in 2018. In 2018, the country was able to achieve a total notification of 21.5 lakh TB cases, of which 25 percent was from private sector. Majority of the TB burden is among the working age group. Nearly 89 percent of TB cases came from the age group 15-69 years. About 2/3rd of the TB patients were males <strong>*15</strong></div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&bull; Maternal Mortality Ratio for India was 370 in 2000, 286 in 2005, 210 in&nbsp; 2010, 158 in 2015 and 145 in 2017. Therefore, the MMRatio for the country reduced by almost 61 percent between 2000 and 2017. MMRatio for China was 59 in 2000, 44 in 2005, 36 in 2010, 30 in 2015 and 29 in 2017. Therefore, the MMRatio for China fell by around 51 percent between 2000 and 2017 <strong>*14</strong> &nbsp;<br /> &nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&bull; The per capita public expenditure (actual) on health in nominal terms has gone up from Rs. 621 in 2009-10 to Rs. 1,112 in 2015-16. Public expenditure on health (includes health sector expenditure by Centre and States/UTs) as a percentage of GDP was 1.02 percent in 2015-16. There is no significant change in public expenditure on health as a percentage of GDP since 2009-10. The Centre-State share in total public expenditure on health was 31:69 in 2015-16, which used to be 36:64 in 2009-10 <strong>*13</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; The North-Eastern states had the highest (viz. Rs. 2,878 per capita) and Empowered Action Group (EAG) states (including Assam) had the lowest (viz. Rs. 871 per capita) average per capita public expenditure on health in 2015-16 (excluding UTs). The North-Eastern states had the highest public health expenditure as a percentage of Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP) in 2015-16 (2.76 percent). Public health expenditure as a percentage of GSDP stood at 1.36 percent for EAG states (including Assam) and 0.76 percent for major non-EAG states <strong>*13</strong></div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&bull; Of the total disease burden in India in 1990, a tenth was caused by a group of risks including unhealthy diet, high blood pressure, high blood sugar, high cholesterol, and overweight, which mainly contribute to ischaemic heart disease, stroke, and diabetes. The contribution of this group of risks increased massively to a quarter of the total disease burden in India in 2016 <strong>*12</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; The Out-of-Pocket Expenditure (OOPE) on health by households is Rs. 3,02,425 crores (62.6 percent of total health expenditure, 2.4 percent of GDP, Rs. 2,394 per capita) for the year 2014-15. Private Health Insurance expenditure is Rs. 17,755 crores (3.7 percent of total health expenditure) for the year 2014-15 <strong>*11</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; Based on available evidence, cardiovascular disease (24 percent), chronic respiratory disease (11 percent), cancer (6 percent) and diabetes (2 percent) are the leading cause of mortality in India <strong>*10</strong><br /> &nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&bull; The total number of dengue cases in India has grown from 28,292 in 2010 to 40,425 in 2014. The total number of dengue related deaths stood at 131 in 2014 <strong>*10</strong></div> <div style="text-align:justify"><br /> &bull; The Proportion (per 1000) of Ailing Persons (PAP), measured as the number of living persons reporting ailments (per 1000 persons), was 89 persons in rural India and 118 persons in urban India <strong>*9</strong><br /> &nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&bull; Private doctors were the most important single source of non-hospitalized treatment in both the sectors (Rural &amp; Urban). More than 70% (72 per cent in the rural areas and 79 per cent in the urban areas) spells of ailment were treated in the private sector (consisting of private doctors, nursing homes, private hospitals, charitable institutions, etc.) <strong>*9</strong></div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&bull; It is observed that in rural India, 42 percent hospitalised treatment was carried out in public hospital and rest 58 percent in private hospital. For the urban India, the corresponding figures were 32 percent and 68 percent. It may be noted in this context that households (or persons within households) were segregated in sector (rural/urban) by their place of domicile, and not by the place of treatment <strong>*9</strong></div> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <div style="text-align:justify">&bull; Average medical expenditure per hospitalisation case: Higher amount was spent for treatment per hospitalised case by people in the private hospitals (Rs. 25850) than in the public hospitals (Rs. 6120). The highest expenditure was recorded for treatment of Cancer (Rs. 56712) followed by that for Cardio-vascular diseases (Rs. 31647). Average medical expenditure per non-hospitalisation case was Rs. 509 in rural India and Rs. 639 in urban India <strong>*9</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; As much as 86 percent of rural population and 82 percent of urban population were still not covered under any scheme of health expenditure support. Government, however, was able to bring about 12 percent urban and 13 percent rural population under health protection coverage through Rastriya Swasthya Bima Yojana (RSBY) or similar plan. Only 12 percent households of the 5th quintile class (Usual Monthly Per Capita Consumer Expenditure) of urban area had some arrangement of medical insurance from private provider <strong>*9</strong></div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&bull; The draft National Health Policy 2015 proposes a potentially achievable target of raising public health expenditure to 2.5% of the GDP. It also notes that 40% of this would need to come from Central expenditures. At current prices, a target of 2.5% of GDP translates to Rs. 3800 per capita, representing an almost four fold increase in five years <strong>*8</strong><br /> &nbsp;<br /> &bull; Maternal mortality ratio (MMR)* in India stood at 560 maternal deaths (per 100000 live births) during 1990, 460 during 1995, 370 during 2000, 280 during 2005 and 190 during 2013. India could reduce MMR by 65 percent between 1990 and 2013<strong> *7</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; At the country level, the two countries that accounted for one third of all global maternal deaths are India at 17 percent (50000) and Nigeria at 14 percent (40000)<strong> *7</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; U5MR in India declined by 55 percent from 126 in 1990 to 56 in 2012. Infant Mortality Rate declined from 88 in 1990 to 44 in 2012. Neonatal mortality rate declined from 51 in 1990 to 31 in 2012. U5MR in India among boys declined from 121 in 1990 to 54 in 2012. U5MR in India among girls declined from 130 in 1990 to 59 in 2012. The share of neonatal deaths in under-five deaths stood at 55 percent in 2012 as compared to 41 percent in 1990 <strong>*6</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; Pneumonia is the leading cause of child mortality in India, responsible for the deaths of nearly 400,000 children under five in 2010 <strong>*5</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; The Indian Commission on Macroeconomics and Health notes that, in India, 13 household person-days per patient were lost per episode of malaria. Furthermore, the commission estimated that the overall monetary losses to families (income losses together with treatment expenses) could amount to between 200 and 400 Indian rupees (US$ 3.5 to 7) <strong>*4</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; Odisha is one of the most highly malaria-endemic states in India, accounting for 24% of reported cases in 2010 despite consisting of less of than 4% of the national population. Malaria is particularly common among tribal groups which represent 44% of the population of Orissa <strong>*4</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; Globally 12% of all deaths among adults aged 30 years and over were attributed to tobacco as compared with 16% in India, 17% in Pakistan and 31% in Bangladesh <strong>*3</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; A recent study illustrated the economic impact of Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs) in India by estimating that if NCDs like: heart disease, cancer, diabetes, chronic respiratory conditions, and other NCDs were &ldquo;eliminated&rdquo;, the country&rsquo;s 2004 GDP would have been 4 to 10 percent greater<strong> *2</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; The share of out-of-pocket household health expenditures on NCDs in India increased from 32 percent to 47 percent between 1995&ndash;1996 and 2004. Moreover, 40 percent of these expenditures were financed by borrowing and sales of assets, increasing the household&rsquo;s financial vulnerability<strong> *2</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; In NFHS-III, 62% of women with two daughters and no sons say they want no more children, compared with 47% in NFHS-II<strong> *1</strong></div> <div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify"><strong>15.</strong> 2019 India TB report, released in 2019, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, please <a href="https://tbcindia.gov.in/WriteReadData/India%20TB%20Report%202019.pdf">click here</a> and <a href="https://tbcindia.gov.in/index1.php?lang=1&amp;level=1&amp;sublinkid=4160&amp;lid=2807">click here</a> to access</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify"><strong>14.</strong> Trends in Maternal Mortality 2000 to 2017: Estimates by World Health Orgnization (WHO), United Nations Children&#39;s Fund (UNICEF), World Bank Group, United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) and the United Nations Population Division (released in September 2019), please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Maternal%20mortality%20Levels%20and%20trends%202000%20to%202017%20Executive%20Summary.pdf" title="Maternal mortality Levels and trends 2000 to 2017 Executive Summary">click here</a> and <a href="https://www.unfpa.org/featured-publication/trends-maternal-mortality-2000-2017">click here</a> to access</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify"><strong>13</strong>. National Health Profile 2018, 13th Issue, Central Bureau of Health Intelligence, Ministry of Health &amp; Family Welfare, please <a href="https://im4change.org/docs/900National%20Health%20Profile%202018%2013th%20Issue%20Central%20Bureau%20of%20Health%20Intelligence%20Ministry%20of%20Health%20&amp;%20Family%20Welfare.pdf">click here</a> to access&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify"><strong>12. </strong>India: Health of the Nation&rsquo;s States - The India State-Level Disease Burden Initiative, Disease Burden Trends in the States of India 1990 to 2016 (released in October, 2017), prepared by Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), Public Health Foundation of India (PHFI), Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) and Ministry of Health &amp; Family Welfare (MoHFW), please <a href="https://im4change.org/docs/11592India_Health_of.pdf">click here</a> to access</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify"><strong>11</strong>. National Health Accounts: Estimates for India 2014-15 (released in October, 2017), prepared by the National Health Accounts Technical Secretariat, National Health Systems Resource Centre and Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/National%20Health%20Accounts%20Estimates%20Report%202014-15.pdf" title="National Health Accounts Estimates for India 2014-15">click here</a> to access</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify"><strong>10</strong>. National Health Profile 2015, Central Bureau of Health Intelligence, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (please <a href="http://www.cbhidghs.nic.in/E-Book%20HTML-2015/index.html">click here</a> to access)</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify"><strong>9</strong>. 71st round NSS report: Key Indicators of Social Consumption in India-Health (published in June 2015), please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/nss_71st_ki_health_30june15.pdf" title="NSS 71st Round Health">click here</a> to access the full report; please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/NSS%20Press%20Release%20Health.pdf" title="NSS Press Note Health">click here</a> to read the summary of findings</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify"><strong>8</strong>. Draft National Health Policy 2015 (published in December 2014), Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (Please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Draft%20National%20Health%20Policy%202015.pdf" title="Draft NHP 2015">click here</a> to download)</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>7</strong>. United Nations&#39; report (released in May, 2014) entitled Trends in maternal mortality estimates 1990 to 2013,&nbsp;</span>(please&nbsp;<a href="tinymce/uploaded/Trends%20in%20Maternal%20Mortality%201990%20to%202013.pdf" title="Trends in Maternal Mortality 1990 to 2013">click here</a>&nbsp;to download)</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><strong>6. </strong><a href="tinymce/uploaded/APR_Progress_Report_2013_9_Sept_2013_1.pdf">Committing to Child Survival</a>: A Promise Renewed Progress Report 2013, UNICEF </span></span></p> </div> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>5</strong>. Pneumonia Progress Report, 2012, released by IVAC and John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012.pdf" title="Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012">click here</a> to access</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>4</strong>. Defeating malaria in Asia, the Pacific, Americas, Middle East and Europe (2012), World Health Organization and PATH,&nbsp;</span></div> <p style="text-align:justify"><a href="http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Defeating%20malaria.pdf">http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Defeating%20malaria.pdf</a></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>3</strong>. WHO Global Report: Mortality Attributable to Tobacco (2012), please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/WHO%20report%20on%20Tobacco.pdf" title="WHO ">click here</a> to access&nbsp;&nbsp;</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>2</strong>. The Growing Danger of Non-Communicable Diseases: Acting Now to Reverse Course, September, 2011, The World Bank, please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/WBDeepeningCrisis.pdf" title="WBDeepeningCrisis">click here</a> to access</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>1</strong>. National Family Health Survey III (2005-06), please <a href="http://rchiips.org/NFHS/nfhs3.shtml">click here</a> to access &nbsp;</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The key findings of the [inside]Global Tuberculosis Report 2022 (released in October 2022)[/inside] by World Health Organization are as follows (please click <a href="/upload/files/Global%20Tuberculosis%20Report%202022.pdf">here</a> and <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022">here</a> to access):&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>India-specific findings</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The case notifications of people newly diagnosed with TB in India were 16,67,136 in 2015, 17,63,876 in 2016, 16,49,694 in 2017, 19,08,683 in 2018, 21,62,323 in 2019, 16,29,301 in 2020, and 19,65,444 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/covid-19-and-tb">click here</a> to access the data. &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Between 2019 and 2020, India witnessed a reduction of 24.65 percent in case notifications of people newly diagnosed with TB. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/covid-19-and-tb ">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Between 2019 and 2021, India faced a reduction of 9.1 percent in case notifications of people newly diagnosed with TB. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/covid-19-and-tb ">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Almost all (90 percent) of the global drop in the number of people newly diagnosed with TB and reported (notified) between 2019 and 2020 was accounted for by 10 countries; the top three, India, Indonesia and the Philippines, accounted for 67 percent. In 2021, 90 percent of the reduction compared with 2019 was accounted for by only five countries. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/covid-19-and-tb ">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Among the 30 high TB burden and 3 global TB watchlist countries, the largest relative reductions in annual notifications between 2019 and 2020 were (ordered according to the size of the relative reduction) in Philippines, Lesotho, Indonesia, Zimbabwe, India, Myanmar and Bangladesh (all &gt;20 percent). In 2021, there was considerable recovery in India, Indonesia and the Philippines, although not to 2019 levels. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/covid-19-and-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2021, eight countries accounted for more than two thirds of global TB cases: India (28 percent), Indonesia (9.2 percent), China (7.4 percent), the Philippines (7.0 percent), Pakistan (5.8 percent), Nigeria (4.4 percent), Bangladesh (3.6 percent) and Democratic Republic of the Congo (2.9 percent). Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-1-tb-incidence">click here</a> to access data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Trends in the TB incidence rate in the 30 high TB burden countries are mixed. Between 2020 and 2021, there were estimated increases in countries with major shortfalls in TB notifications in 2020 and 2021 (e.g. India, Indonesia, Myanmar, Philippines), while in others the previous decline in the TB incidence rate has slowed or stabilized. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-1-tb-incidence">click here</a> to access data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; TB incidence rates for India were 341 per lakh population in 2000, 340 per lakh population in 2001, 339 per lakh population in 2002, 337 per lakh population in 2003, 334 per lakh population in 2004, 329 per lakh population in 2005, 323 per lakh population in 2006, 316 per lakh population in 2007, 309 per lakh population in 2008, 300 per lakh population in 2009, 292 per lakh population in 2010, 284 per lakh population in 2011, 277 per lakh population in 2012, 270 per lakh population in 2013, 263 per lakh population in 2014, 256 per lakh population in 2015, 249 per lakh population in 2016, 234 per lakh population in 2017, 224 per lakh population in 2018, 214 per lakh population in 2019, 204 per lakh population in 2020, and 210 per lakh population in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-1-tb-incidence">click here</a> to access data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; TB case notification rates (of new and relapse cases) for India were 105 per lakh population in 2000, 101 per lakh population in 2001, 97 per lakh population in 2002, 96 per lakh population in 2003, 100 per lakh population in 2004, 100 per lakh population in 2005, 105 per lakh population in 2006, 109 per lakh population in 2007, 110 per lakh population in 2008, 110 per lakh population in 2009, 108 per lakh population in 2010, 105 per lakh population in 2011, 101 per lakh population in 2012, 96 per lakh population in 2013, 123 per lakh population in 2014, 126 per lakh population in 2015, 132 per lakh population in 2016, 122 per lakh population in 2017, 139 per lakh population in 2018, 156 per lakh population in 2019, 117 per lakh population in 2020, and 140 per lakh population in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-1-tb-incidence">click here</a> to access data. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2021, 82 percent of global TB deaths among HIV-negative people occurred in the WHO African and South-East Asia regions; India alone accounted for 36 percent. The African and South-East Asia regions accounted for 82 percent of the combined total of TB deaths in HIV-negative and HIV-positive people; India accounted for 32 percent. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-2-tb-mortality">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Trends in the number of TB deaths in the 30 high TB burden countries are mixed. Between 2019 and 2021, striking increases are estimated to have occurred in countries with major shortfalls in TB notifications in 2020 and 2021 (e.g. India, Indonesia, Myanmar, Philippines), while in others previous declines have slowed or stabilized. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-2-tb-mortality">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The estimated absolute numbers of TB deaths (HIV-positive and HIV-negative) in India were 7,10,000 in 2000, 7,00,000 in 2001, 6,90,000 in 2002, 6,70,000 in 2003, 6,50,000 in 2004, 6,40,000 in 2005, 6,30,000 in 2006, 6,30,000 in 2007, 5,90,000 in 2008, 5,80,000 in 2009, 5,50,000 in 2010, 5,40,000 in 2011, 5,30,000 in 2012, 5,20,000 in 2013, 4,90,000 in 2014, 4,70,000 in 2015, 4,60,000 in 2016, 4,60,000 in 2017, 4,60,000 in 2018, 4,50,000 in 2019, 4,80,000 in 2020, and 5,10,000 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-2-tb-mortality">click here</a> to access the data.<br /> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<br /> &bull; The estimated numbers of incident cases of Multidrug- and rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/RR-TB) were 1,49,000 in 2015, 1,44,000 in 2016, 1,35,000 in 2017, 129,000 in 2018, 123,000 in 2019, 1,17,000 in 2020, and 1,19,000 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-3-drug-resistant-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The countries with the largest share of incident cases of MDR/RR-TB in 2021 were India (26 percent of global cases), the Russian Federation (8.5 percent of global cases) and Pakistan (7.9 percent of global cases). Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-3-drug-resistant-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2019&ndash;2021, the first-ever national survey was completed in India; this was one of the largest surveys to date, with a sample size of about 3,20,000 people. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2.4-tb-prevalence-surveys">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2020, the first full year of the COVID-19 pandemic, there were particularly large absolute and relative reductions in India, Indonesia and Philippines, followed by some recovery in 2021.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The number&nbsp;of notifications of people newly diagnosed with TB (new and relapse cases, all forms) was 11,15,718 in 2000, 10,85,075 in 2001, 10,60,951 in 2002, 10,73,282 in 2003, 11,36,182 in 2004, 11,56,248 in 2005, 12,28,827 in 2006, 12,95,943 in 2007, 13,32,267 in 2008, 13,51,913 in 2009, 13,39,866 in 2010, 13,23,949 in 2011, 12,89,836 in 2012, 12,43,905 in 2013, 16,09,547 in 2014, 16,67,136 in 2015, 17,63,876 in 2016, 16,49,694 in 2017, 19,08,683 in 2018, 21,62,323 in 2019, 16,29,301 in 2020, and 19,65,444 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-1-case-notifications ">click here</a> to access the data. &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The number of estimated TB incident cases in India was 36,10,000 in 2000, 36,70,000 in 2001, 37,20,000 in 2002, 37,60,000 in 2003, 37,90,000 in 2004, 38,00,000 in 2005, 37,90,000 in 2006, 37,60,000 in 2007, 37,20,000 in 2008, 36,80,000 in 2009, 36,30,000 in 2010, 35,70,000 in 2011, 35,30,000 in 2012, 34,80,000 in 2013, 34,40,000 in 2014, 33,90,000 in 2015, 33,30,000 in 2016, 31,60,000 in 2017, 30,60,000 in 2018, 29,60,000 in 2019, 28,50,000 in 2020, and 29,50,000 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-1-case-notifications ">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The contribution of public-private mix (PPM) initiatives to total notifications was 2.3 percent in 2010, 0.26 percent in 2011, 0.24 percent in 2012, 6.0 percent in 2013, 12.0 percent in 2014, 11.0 percent in 2015, 17.0 percent in 2016, 23.0 percent in 2017, 26.0 percent in 2018, 28.0 percent in 2019, 31.0 percent in 2020, and 33.0 percent in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-1-case-notifications ">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The percentage of people in India newly diagnosed with pulmonary TB who were bacteriologically confirmed was 35 percent in 2000, 41 percent in 2001, 44 percent in 2002, 49 percent in 2003, 53 percent in 2004, 56 percent in 2005, 58 percent in 2006, 60 percent in 2007, 61 percent in 2008, 62 percent in 2009, 63 percent in 2010, 65 percent in 2011, 66 percent in 2012, 71 percent in 2013, 66 percent in 2014, 64 percent in 2015, 63 percent in 2016, 71 percent in 2017, 57 percent in 2018, 57 percent in 2019, 54 percent in 2020, and 66 percent in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-2-diagnostic-testing-for-tb--hiv-associated-tb-and-drug-resistant-tb">click here</a> to access the data</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The number of WHO-recommended rapid tests used per 1,00,000 population in the case of India was 258 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-2-diagnostic-testing-for-tb--hiv-associated-tb-and-drug-resistant-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The percentage of people in India initially tested for TB with a WHO-recommended rapid test who had a positive test was 24 percent in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-2-diagnostic-testing-for-tb--hiv-associated-tb-and-drug-resistant-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The number of WHO-recommended rapid diagnostic tests per person notified as a TB case (new and relapse cases, all forms) in India was 1.8 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-2-diagnostic-testing-for-tb--hiv-associated-tb-and-drug-resistant-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The estimated TB treatment coverage for India was 67 percent in 2021. The estimated TB treatment coverage among children aged 0&ndash;14 years for India was 32 percent in 2021. The estimated TB treatment coverage among children aged &gt;= 15 years for India was 71 percent in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-3-tb-treatment-and-treatment-coverage">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2021, ten countries accounted for 75 percent of the global gap between the estimated number of people who developed TB (incident TB cases) and the number of people who were detected with TB and officially reported. About 60 percent of the global gap was accounted for by five countries: India (24 percent), Indonesia (13 percent), the Philippines (10 percent), Pakistan (6.6 percent) and Nigeria (6.3 percent). Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-3-tb-treatment-and-treatment-coverage">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The estimated coverage of antiretroviral therapy for people living with HIV who developed TB for India 59 percent in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-3-tb-treatment-and-treatment-coverage">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The number of Indian people diagnosed with MDR/RR-TB was 3,288 in 2010, 4,297 in 2011, 17,253 in 2012, 18,888 in 2013, 25,748 in 2014, 28,876 in 2015, 37,258 in 2016, 39,009 in 2017, 58,347 in 2018, 66,255 in 2019, 49,679 in 2020, and 58,837 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-4-drug-resistant-tb-treatment">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The number of Indian people enrolled on MDR/RR-TB was 2,182 in 2010, 3,378 in 2011, 14,117 in 2012, 21,093 in 2013, 24,073 in 2014, 26,966 in 2015, 32,914 in 2016, 35,950 in 2017, 47,284 in 2018, 60,858 in 2019, 42,505 in 2020, and 53,037 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-4-drug-resistant-tb-treatment">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The number of Indian people enrolled on MDR/RR-TB was 2,182 in 2010, 3,378 in 2011, 14,117 in 2012, 21,093 in 2013, 24,073 in 2014, 26,966 in 2015, 32,914 in 2016, 35,950 in 2017, 47,284 in 2018, 60,858 in 2019, 42,505 in 2020, and 53,037 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-4-drug-resistant-tb-treatment">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The WHO regions with the best treatment coverage are the European Region and the Region of the Americas. Among the 30 high MDR/RR-TB burden countries, those with the best treatment coverage are 2021: Peru, the Russian Federation, Azerbaijan, the Republic of Moldova, India and Kazakhstan. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-4-drug-resistant-tb-treatment">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The estimated treatment coverage for MDR/RR-TB for India was 45 percent in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-4-drug-resistant-tb-treatment">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Seven countries (India, Nigeria, South Africa, Uganda, United Republic of Tanzania, Zambia and Zimbabwe) each reported initiating over 200 000 people with HIV on TB preventive treatment in 2021, accounting collectively for 82 percent of the 2.8 million reported globally. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-prevention">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Since 2014, spending on the diagnosis and treatment of drug-susceptible TB has fallen slightly. Spending on treatment of multidrug and rifampicin-resistant TB (MDR/RR-TB) has increased steadily since 2010: this growth is largely explained by trends in the BRICS group of countries (i.e., Brazil, Russian Federation, India, China and South Africa). Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/financing-for-tb">click here</a> to access the data. &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Bangladesh, Cambodia, China and Zambia are examples of high TB burden countries that have steadily increased domestic funding specifically allocated to NTPs (as opposed to funding allocated more generally for inpatient and outpatient care, including for people with TB) in recent years. There was a considerable reduction in domestic spending in India between 2020 and 2021; one explanation for this was less need for spending on second-line anti-TB drugs in 2021, given stocks that still existed from 2020. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/financing-for-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The international funding (at constant 2021 US$) for national TB programmes on TB prevention, diagnostic and treatment services was 37 million in 2010, 65 million in 2011, 61 million in 2012, 143 million in 2013, 92 million in 2014, 142 million in 2015, 135 million in 2016, 187 million in 2017, 170 million in 2018, 91 million in 2019, 85 million in 2020, and 154 million in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/financing-for-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The domestic funding (at constant 2021 US$) for national TB programmes on TB prevention, diagnostic and treatment services was 56 million in 2010, 60 million in 2011, 44 million in 2012, 85 million in 2013, 162 million in 2014, 132 million in 2015, 139 million in 2016, 305 million in 2017, 348 million in 2018, 365 million in 2019, 326 million in 2020, and 183 million in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/financing-for-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In the case of India, the sources of funding and funding gaps reported for the TB-specific budgets included in national strategic plans for TB were domestic funding: 66 percent, Global Fund: 29 percent, and international funding (excluding Global Fund): 4.9 percent in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/financing-for-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The distribution of the two UHC indicators in the 30 high TB burden countries and three global TB watchlist countries shows that, in general, values improve with income level; this is especially evident for the SCI. Nonetheless, the risk of catastrophic health expenditures is high (15 or above) in several middle-income countries, including Angola, Bangladesh, Cambodia, China, India, and Nigeria. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/uhc-tb-determinants/6.1-universal-health-coverage">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; To achieve Universal Health Coverage (UHC), substantial increases in investment in health are critical. From 2000 to 2019 there was a striking increase in health expenditure (from all sources) per capita in a few high TB burden countries, especially the upper-middle-income countries of Brazil, China, South Africa and Thailand. A steady upward trend was evident in Bangladesh, Ethiopia, India, Indonesia, Lesotho, Mongolia, Mozambique, the Philippines and Viet Nam, and there was a noticeable rise from 2012 to 2017 in Myanmar. Elsewhere, however, levels of spending have been relatively stable, and at generally much lower levels. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/uhc-tb-determinants/6.1-universal-health-coverage">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The current health expenditures per capita were US$ 86 in 2000, US$ 96 in 2001, US$ 99 in 2002, US$ 101 in 2003, US$ 109 in 2004, US$ 114 in 2005, US$ 119 in 2006, US$ 126 in 2007, US$ 131 in 2008, US$ 139 in 2009, US$ 141 in 2010, US$ 146 in 2011, US$ 162 in 2012, US$ 190 in 2013, US$ 189 in 2014, US$ 197 in 2015, US$ 205 in 2016, US$ 182 in 2017, US$ 196 in 2018, and US$ 211 in 2019.&nbsp;Kindly <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/uhc-tb-determinants/6.1-universal-health-coverage">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The estimated number of TB cases attributable to alcohol use disorders was 2,58,000, diabetes was 1,05,000, HIV was 93,000, smoking was 1,10,000 and undernourishment was 7,38,000 in 2021. Kindly <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/uhc-tb-determinants/6-3-tb-determinants">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Based on the latest available data in the World Bank database, some upper-middle-income and lower-middle-income countries (e.g. Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, Mongolia, South Africa, Thailand, and Viet Nam) appear to be performing relatively well. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/uhc-tb-determinants/6-3-tb-determinants">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Three new antigen-based skin tests for TB infection that perform better than tuberculin skin tests (particularly in terms of specificity) were evaluated and recommended by WHO in 2022; these are the Cy-Tb skin test, Serum Institute of India, India; C-TST, Anhui Zhifei Longcom Biopharmaceutical Co. Ltd, China; and Diaskintest, JSC Generium, Russian Federation. WHO plans to evaluate the following tests in the coming year: culture-free, targeted-sequencing solutions to test for drug resistance directly from sputum specimens; broth microdilution methods for drug-susceptibility testing (DST); and new IGRAs to test for TB infection. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-research-and-innovation">click here</a> to access the information.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In India, the Ministry of Health &amp; Family Welfare launched the 21-day TB Mukt Bharat Campaign at Ayushman Bharat Health and Wellness Centres (AB-HWCs), from 24 March to 14 April 2022. The campaign aimed to meaningfully engage community and civil society to build a people&rsquo;s movement to end TB. It was celebrated across 75 228 AB-HWCs; a total of 6 801 956 people were screened for TB, and 38 328 community awareness activities took place using 21 479 trained TB champions. Linked to this initiative, primary health care teams led by the newly introduced cadre of community health officers (CHOs) provide people-centred TB services to people&rsquo;s doorsteps. AB-HWCs are playing an important role in improving awareness, identifying TB symptoms at an early stage, offering treatment adherence and psychosocial support to individuals and families with TB, and creating a strong network of TB survivors to strengthen the TB response. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/featured-topics/civil-society-engagement">click here</a> to access the more information.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; WHO has been advancing MAF-TB efforts to strengthen the engagement of the private sector and other public care providers not linked to national TB programmes (NTPs) through a new initiative with the Bill &amp; Melinda Gates Foundation. The initiative promotes the development of enhanced PPM data dashboards in seven priority countries: Bangladesh, India, Indonesia, Kenya, Nigeria, Pakistan and the Philippines. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/featured-topics/maf-tb">click here</a> to get more information.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; India has developed a national multisectoral action framework for TB; this strategic document makes a strong case for transforming India&rsquo;s TB elimination efforts from a health sector struggle to a whole-of-society responsibility. The framework is a guide for policy-makers and a call to action for communities, civil society, the private sector, and other partners and stakeholders. The overarching goal is to strengthen the country&rsquo;s capacity for a multisectoral response that facilitates TB elimination by 2025, with the key objective being to achieve policy convergence and adopt a health-in-all approach. The framework highlights the six key strategic areas for integrated action: integrated health care service delivery; TB-free workplaces; socioeconomic support for patients; awareness generation and infection control; corporate social responsibility and investment in TB; and targeted intervention for key affected populations. It defines the list of government ministries and other stakeholders, and the strategic scope of collaboration with each of them. Also, the framework acknowledges the importance of resources for defined strategic areas (e.g. financing, capacity-building, technical resources and research), and calls on partners and governments to mobilize resources for its implementation. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/featured-topics/maf-tb">click here</a> to get more information.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The key findings of the report titled [inside]Rural Health Statistics 2020-21 (released in May 2022)[/inside], which has been prepared by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, are as follows (please <a href="/upload/files/Rural%20Health%20Statistics%202020-21.pdf">click here</a> to access):</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; As on 31st March, 2021, there were 1,56,101 and 1,718 Sub Centres (SCs), 25,140 and 5,439 Primary Health Centres (PHCs), and 5,481 and 470 Community Health Centres (CHCs), respectively, which were functioning in rural and urban areas of the country.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average rural population covered by a Sub Centre was 5,734 as on 1st July, 2021, whereas the norm is that one Sub Centre should be serving a population of size in the range 300-5,000.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average population in tribal/ hilly/ desert areas covered by a Sub Centre was 3,839 as on 1st July, 2021, whereas the norm is that one Sub Centre should be serving a population of size up to 3,000 in such areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; A Sub Centre is the most peripheral and first contact point between the primary health care system and the community. Sub Centres are assigned tasks relating to interpersonal communication in order to bring about behavioral change and provide services in relation to maternal and child health, family welfare, nutrition, immunisation, diarrhoea control and control of communicable diseases programmes. Each Sub Centre is required to be manned by at least one auxiliary nurse midwife (ANM) / female health worker and one male health worker. Under the National Rural Health Mission (NRHM), there is a provision for one additional second ANM on contract basis. One lady health visitor (LHV) is entrusted with the task of supervision of six Sub Centres. The Government of India bears the salary of ANM and LHV while the salary of the Male Health Worker is borne by the state governments.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average rural population covered by a Primary Health Centre (PHC) was 35,602 as on 1st July, 2021, whereas the norm is that one PHC should be serving a population of size in the range 20,000-30,000.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average population in tribal/ hilly/ desert areas covered by a PHC was 25,507 as on 1st July, 2021, whereas the norm is that one PHC should be serving a population of size up to 20,000 in such areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; PHC is the first contact point between the village community and the medical officer. The PHCs were envisaged to provide an integrated curative and preventive health care to the rural population with emphasis on preventive and promotive aspects of health care. The PHCs are established and maintained by the state governments under the Minimum Needs Programme (MNP)/ Basic Minimum Services (BMS) Programme. As per minimum requirement, a PHC is to be manned by a medical officer supported by 14 paramedical and other staff. Under NRHM, there is a provision for two additional staff nurses at PHCs on contract basis. It acts as a referral unit for 6 Sub Centres and has 4-6 beds for patients. The activities of PHC involve curative, preventive, promotive and family welfare services.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average rural population covered by a Community Health Centre (CHC) was 1,63,298 as on 1st July, 2021, whereas the norm is that one CHC should be serving a population of size in the range 80,000-1,20,000.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average population in tribal/ hilly/ desert areas covered by a CHC was 1,03,756 as on 1st July, 2021, whereas the norm is that one CHC should be serving a population of size up to 80,000 in such areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; CHCs are being established and maintained by the state government under Minimum Needs Program (MNP)/Basic Minimum Services (BMS) programme. As per minimum norms, a CHC is required to be manned by four medical specialists i.e. surgeon, physician, gynecologist and pediatrician supported by 21 paramedical and other staff. It has 30 indoor beds with one OT, X-ray, labour room and laboratory facilities. It serves as a referral centre for 4 PHCs and also provides facilities for obstetric care and specialist consultations.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Rural Health Care System in India</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Out of the sanctioned posts, a significant percentage of posts were vacant at all the levels. Nearly 21.1 percent of the sanctioned posts of Health Worker (Female)/ Auxiliary Nurse Midwife-ANM (at SCs and PHCs) were vacant as compared to 41.9 percent vacancies of Health Worker (Male) in 2021 at SCs. At PHCs, 64.2 percent of the sanctioned posts of Health Assistant (Male and Female) and 21.8 percent of the sanctioned posts of Doctors were vacant in 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The availability of manpower is one of the important prerequisites for the efficient functioning of the Rural Health services. As on 31st March, 2021, the overall shortfall (which excludes the existing surplus in some of the states) in the posts of Health Worker (Female) / ANM was 2.9 percent of the total requirement as per the norm of one HW(F)/ ANM per Sub Centre and PHC. The overall shortfall was mainly due to shortfall in states of Uttar Pradesh (1,871), Himachal Pradesh (1,253), Gujarat (616), Odisha (397), Tripura (380), and Uttarakhand (252).&nbsp;Similarly, in case of Health Worker (Male), there was a shortfall of 66.1 percent of the requirement. There was a vacancy of 21.1 percent for HW (Female)/ ANM (at SCs and PHCs) as compared to the sanctioned posts. There was a vacancy of 41.9 percent for Health Worker (Male) as compared to the sanctioned posts in 2021 at SCs. At PHCs, 64.2 percent of the sanctioned posts of Health Assistant (Male and Female) and 21.8 percent of the sanctioned posts of Doctors were vacant in 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; PHC is the first contact point between the village community and the Medical Officer. Manpower in PHC includes a Medical Officer supported by paramedical and other staff. In the case of PHC, for Health Assistant (male + female), the shortfall was 72.2 percent. For allopathic doctors at PHC, there was a shortfall of 4.3 percent of the total requirement at the national level. This happened due to a significant shortfall of doctors at PHCs in the states of Odisha (362), Karnataka (340), and Chhattisgarh (271).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The Community Health Centres provide specialised medical care of Surgeons, Obstetricians &amp; Gynecologists, Physicians and Pediatricians. The position of specialists manpower at CHCs as on 31st March, 2021 shows that out of the sanctioned posts, 72.3 percent of Surgeons, 64.2 percent of Obstetricians &amp; Gynecologists, 69.2 percent of physicians, and 67.1 percent of pediatricians were vacant. Overall 68 percent of the sanctioned posts of specialists at CHCs were vacant in rural areas. Moreover, as compared to requirements for existing infrastructure, there was a shortfall of 83.2 percent of Surgeons, 74.2 percent of Obstetricians &amp; Gynecologists, 82.2 percent of Physicians, and 80.6 percent of Pediatricians. Overall, there was a shortfall of 79.9 percent of specialists at the CHCs as compared to the requirement for existing CHCs. The shortfall of specialists was significantly high in most of the states. However, in addition to the specialists, about 17,012 General Duty Medical Officers (GDMOs) Allopathic and 514 AYUSH Specialists along with 2,955 GDMO AYUSH were also available at CHCs as on 31st March, 2021. In addition to this, there were 805 Anaesthetists and 289 Eye Surgeons available at CHCs as on 31st March, 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Comparison of the manpower position of major categories in 2021 with that in 2020 shows an overall increase in the number of ANMs at SCs &amp; PHCs and Doctors at PHCs during the period. However, there was a marginal decrease in the number of Specialists at CHCs. There was an increase of ANMs at SCs &amp; PHCs from 2,12,593 in 2020 to 2,14,820 in 2021 and Doctors at PHCs from 28,516 in 2020 to 31,716 in 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Considering the status of paramedical staff, there was an increase of Lab Technicians from 19,903 in 2020 to 22,723 in 2021 at PHCs and CHCs. There was an increase in the number of pharmacists from 25,792 in 2020 to 28,537 in 2021. A significant increase was also observed for nursing staff under PHC &amp; CHCs from 71,847 in 2020 to 79,044 in 2021. The number of radiographers decreased from 2,434 in 2020 to 2,418 in 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; A total of 1,224 Sub Divisional/ Sub District Hospitals were functioning as on 31st March, 2021 throughout the country. In these hospitals, 15,274 doctors were available. In addition to these doctors, nearly 42,073 paramedical staffs were also available at those hospitals as on 31st March, 2021. The number of doctors in Sub Divisional/ Sub District Hospitals increased from 13,399 in 2020 to 15,274 in 2021. The number of paramedical staff in Sub Divisional/ Sub District Hospitals also went up from 29,937 in 2020 to 42,073 in 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In addition to the above, 764 District Hospitals (DHs) were also functioning as on 31st March, 2021 throughout the country. There were 26,929 doctors available in the DHs. In addition to the doctors, roughly 90,435 paramedical staff were also available at District Hospitals as on 31st March, 2021. The number of doctors in District Hospitals went up from 22,827 in 2020 to 26,929 in 2021. The number of paramedical staff in District Hospitals increased from 80,920 in 2020 to 90,435 in 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The key findings of the report titled [inside]India TB Report 2022: Coming Together to End TB Altogether (released in March 2022)[/inside], which has been produced by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, are as follows (please <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/TB%20Annual%20Report%202022.pdf">click here</a> to access):&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; As per the Global TB Report 2021, the estimated incidence of all forms of TB in India for the year 2020 was 188 per 100,000 population (129-257 per 100,000 population).&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The total number of incident tuberculosis i.e., TB patients (new and relapse) notified during 2021 was 19,33,381 which was 19 percent higher than that of 2020 (16,28,161). The programme had been able to catch-up with the dip in TB notifications that was observed around the months when the two major covid waves happened in India.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The estimated incidence of all forms of TB in India as per Global TB report was 456 per lakh population in 2010, 437 per lakh population in 2011, 420 per lakh population in 2012, 404 per lakh population in 2013, 350 per lakh population in 2014, 328 per lakh population in 2015, 303 per lakh population in 2016, 286 per lakh population in 2017, 276 per lakh population in 2018, 266 per lakh population in 2019, and 257 per lakh population in 2020.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The estimated number of Multidrug-resistant (MDR) and Extensively drug-resistant (XDR) TB cases to have been put on treatment as per the global TB report 2021 was 4 per 100,000 and 1 per 100,000 population, respectively.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; During the pandemic, a significant reduction was observed in the total number of&nbsp;Drug-Resistant TB&nbsp;(DR-TB) patients started on treatment as compared to 2019. In 2020 and 2021, there was a reduction of 14 percent and 9 percent in the number MDR patients put on treatment as compared to the&nbsp;estimated numbers.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The estimated mortality rate among all forms of TB was 37 per 100,000 population (34-40 per 100,000 population) in 2020, as per the Global TB Report 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; There has been a slight increase in the mortality rate due to all forms of TB between 2019 and 2020 by 11 percent in the country.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In absolute numbers, the total number of estimated deaths from all forms of TB excluding HIV, for 2020 was 4.93 lakhs (4.53-5.36 lakhs) in the country, which was 13 percent higher that of the year 2019 estimate. &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; As per Nikshay, the total number of reported deaths among Drug sensitive (DS-TB) notified in 2020 was 76,002 (4.3 percent of the total notifications of 2020) which is 15.4 percent of the estimate for the country, thus emphasizing the importance of establishing a &ldquo;TB Death Surveillance and Response&rdquo; system in line with the maternal mortality surveillance to improve the coverage and real time resolution of lacunae including the system related factors.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; A recent systematic review (2020) estimating the direct&nbsp;and indirect patient costs of drug-sensitive and drug-resistant TB care in India reports that 7 to 32 percent of among DS-TB patients and 68 percent of DR-TB were experiencing catastrophic costs for TB care in India.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2021, among 21,35,830 patients diagnosed, 20,30,509 (95 percent) patients were put on treatment. 61 percent were male and 39 percent were female among the patients put on treatment.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Among the total notification, 6 percent patients were in paediatric age group. Among 17,51,437 TB patients notified in 2020, 83 percent were successfully treated while 4 percent died during treatment.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2021, 48,232 MDR/RR-TB patients were diagnosed and 43,380 (90 percent) were put on treatment. 8,455 Pre-XDR-TB, 376 XDR-TB and 13,724 H mono/poly patients were diagnosed and 7,562 (89 percent), 333 (89 percent) and 12,008 (87 percent) were put on treatment respectively.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; A total of 1939 patients were initiated on shorter oral Bdq-containing MDR/RR-TB regimen, 23,889 on longer M/XDR-TB regimen and 25,235 patients were initiated on shorter injection containing MDR-TB regimen.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The cohort of DR-TB patients initiated on treatment in 2019 reported 57 percent treatment success rate (34,535/60,873). This includes 39,358 of patients on shorter MDR-TB regimen (inj-containing) with 59 percent treatment success rate and 1,280 of patient on longer oral regimen with 70 percent treatment success rate. This cohort also includes 11,791 patients put on old conventional MDR-TB regimen that has reported 49 percent treatment success rate.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Available evidence and modelling studies indicate that nearly 20 percent of all TB cases in India may suffer from Diabetes Mellitus (DM).&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Under the&nbsp;National Tuberculosis Elimination Programme&nbsp;(NTEP), in 2021, out of the 74 percent of the known tobacco usage among all TB patients, 12 percent of TB patients were reported to be tobacco users. Among those screened, 30 percent were linked to tobacco cessation services.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Of all the notified TB patients, 95 percent know their HIV status. (Public: 96 percent, Private: 92 percent).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Nearly 95 percent of TB Detection Centres (TDCs) have co-located HIV testing facilities.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; More than 96 percent of&nbsp;People Living With HIV/AIDS&nbsp;(PLHIV) visiting the antiretroviral therapy (ART) centres every month are screened for existing TB symptoms.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; As per Nikshay data, the linkage of HIV-TB co-infected patients to Cotrimoxazole Preventive Therapy (CPT) and Antiretroviral Therapy in 2021 were 93 percent &amp; 95 percent, respectively.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Kindly click <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/JSA-Press-Statement-UB-2022-23-English-Final.pdf">here</a> and <a href="https://im4change.org/latest-news-updates/union-health-budget-2022-23-has-completely-overlooked-the-lessons-of-the-covid-19-epidemic-says-jan-swasthya-abhiyan.html">here</a> to access the [inside]Press release by Jan Swasthya Abhiyan dated February 2, 2022[/inside] on the Union Health Budget 2022-23.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">---</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The COVID-19 pandemic has devastated families and communities and disrupted societies and economies. Patients had to endure various indignities in both public and private hospitals without protections or recourse to adequate preventive and redressal mechanisms. While the COVID-19 vaccine is seen as a solution to the pandemic, its roll-out has also been rife with inequalities. However, many of the problems we have seen at this time stem from the deep-rooted problems in the public health system. A critical look at India&quot;s health system from the perspective of its patients is overdue.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Oxfam India undertook two rapid surveys on Patient&quot;s Rights Charter and COVID-19 vaccination through self-administered questionnaires, covering 28 states and 5 Union territories; as such, this bears the limitations arising from it being a self-selected sample. The former was done between February and April 2021 and received 3890 responses while the latter was done between August and September 2021 covering 10,955 respondents. Given the distinctive focus of each survey, both are presented separately.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The key findings of the survey on Patient&#39;s Rights done for Oxfam India report titled [inside]Securing Rights of Patients in India: Lessons from rapid surveys on peoples&rsquo; experiences of Patient&rsquo;s Rights Charter and the COVID-19 vaccination drive (released on 18 November, 2021)[/inside] are as follows (please <a href="/upload/files/Securing%20Rights%20of%20Patients%20in%20India%20by%20Oxfam%20India.pdf">click here</a> to access):&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; This captures some of the experience of patients with both the public and private healthcare system over the last decade with a focus on the provisions of the Patients &quot;Rights Charter.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Right to Confidentiality, Human Dignity and Privacy: Over a third of women (35 percent) said that they had to undergo a physical examination by a male practitioner without another female present in the room.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Right to Information: 74 percent of people said that the doctor simply wrote the prescription or treatment or asked them to get tests/ investigations done without explaining their disease, nature and/or cause of illness.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Right to Informed Consent: More than half of the respondents (57 percent) who were themselves/ their relatives had been hospitalised did not receive any information about investigations and tests being done.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Right to Second Opinion: At least a third of respondents who had themselves/ their relatives hospitalised said their doctor did not allow a second opinion.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Right to Non-Discrimination: A third of Muslim respondents and over 20 percent Dalit and Adivasi respondents reported feeling discriminated against on the grounds of their religion or caste in a hospital/ by a healthcare professional.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Right to Choose Source of Obtaining Medicine or Test: 8 in 10 respondents reported being asked to get tests/diagnostics from one place only.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Right to Transparency in Rates and Care According to Prescribed Rates: 58 percent of people of those who had themselves/ their relatives hospitalised, said that they were not provided with an estimated cost of treatment/procedure before the start of treatment/procedure. Three in every 10 people surveyed reported being denied case papers, patient records, investigation reports for treatment/ procedure by the hospital even after requesting the same.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Right to Take Discharge of Patient or Receive Body of Deceased from the Hospital: 19 percent of respondents whose close relatives were hospitalized said that they were denied the release of the dead body by the hospital</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em>The COVID-19 pandemic has deepened existing structural inequalities in the healthcare system. The report recommends:</em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The MoHFW should set up a mechanism to review the present status of adoption of the Patient&quot;s Rights Charter (PRC) in all states and UTs and order its immediate adoption. It should include the PRC in the Clinical Establishment Act (CEA) and issue a letter to the states and Union territories (UTs) for displaying PRC in all private and public hospitals in view of the unprecedented crisis induced by the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly for hospitals taking part in the Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (PMJAY).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The State and UT governments should issue orders to display the PRC in all private and public hospitals irrespective of adoption of CEA and ensure grievance redressal mechanisms for patients, through the appointment of an internal grievance officer within every public and private clinical establishment.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The National Medical Commission should introduce mandatory modules on patients &quot;rights in the healthcare curriculum.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em>Some of the key findings from the survey of the experiences of the vaccination drive were:</em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Eight out of 10 people said that they do not think that the government will be able to vaccinate all adults by December 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; 80 percent of people believed that it is more difficult for a daily wage worker to get the vaccine as compared to a salaried, middle-class person. Most did not think that the experience was equitable.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; With respect to how the government should address inequity in vaccination, some specific suggestions were:&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">- 83 percent believed that all vaccination should be done completely free of cost through the government, like previous vaccination drives.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">- Only 2 percent of respondents were in favour of a tax on essentials like fuel to fund the vaccination. 55 percent believed that imposing a one-time tax of 1 percent on the net-worth of India&quot;s richest 1000 families was the best mode of funding.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">- 89 percent of people said that the operational hours of vaccination centres should be expanded beyond 9 AM-5 PM.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">- 95 percent of people from all age categories felt that vaccination must be brought closer to the elderly, persons with disabilities and informal sector workers by making use of mobile vans, vaccination camps and home-based vaccination.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">- 88 percent believed that the government must ensure that marginalized groups such as street dwellers, migrant workers, immigrants, refugees and asylum seekers are given access to<br /> vaccination without having to furnish documentation.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">- Improve information about vaccination. 74 percent of respondents earned less than INR 10,000 per month and over 60 percent of respondents from marginalized and minority communities felt that the government has failed in informing them about how and when to get vaccinated. Eight in 10 felt that the government had been changing its COVID-19 vaccine policies too frequently.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">- 89 percent of people said that the government must do more to ramp vaccine production, especially through public sector companies.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">- The experiences of vaccination show the</p> <p style="text-align:justify">-- Challenges with vaccination:</p> <p style="text-align:justify">---29 percent said that they either had to make multiple visits to the vaccination centre or stand in long queues.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">---22 percent faced issues in booking the slot online or had to try for multiple days ahead to get a slot</p> <p style="text-align:justify">---9 percent people said that they had to lose a day&#39;s wages to get themselves vaccinated.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">-- Reason for not getting vaccinated:</p> <p style="text-align:justify">---43 percent respondents stated that they could not get vaccinated because the vaccination centre had run out of vaccines when they visited the centre.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">---12 percent did not get vaccinated because they could not afford the high prices of vaccines.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The lessons from the COVID-19 vaccination drive, would not only help to improve the current response but can derive learnings improving equitable administration of any vaccine in future.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">-All vaccination should continue to be done completely free of cost through the government system; avoid the use of private hospitals to deliver vaccination;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">-Proactively release timely information on vaccination strategies, modalities and accomplishments in disaggregated, user-friendly and open source formats;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">-Prioritise allocation, distribution and administration of vaccines for marginalized, poor, vulnerable, excluded communities first, of course along with for those who are at risk;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">-Maintain record and release disaggregated data on vaccination coverage based on social and economic groups including Dalits(Scheduled Caste), Adivasis(Scheduled Tribes), Muslims, and Persons with Disabilities (PwD);<br /> &nbsp;<br /> -Bring vaccination closer to the vulnerable and extend operational hours of vaccination centres beyond 9 AM-5 PM to allow for vaccination without a loss of wages;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">-Improve information dissemination about vaccination; existing technology-based mechanisms for disseminating information about vaccination centres locations and availability of vaccines is not sufficient. It would be important to build robust and functional grievance redressal mechanisms, from national to local, to address emerging challenges. Adequate flexibility must be given to local health administrations to adapt to local circumstances;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">-Further ramp up vaccine production, especially through the use of public sector companies.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The report titled [inside]&#39;COVID-19 Third Wave Preparedness: Children&rsquo;s Vulnerability and Recovery&#39; (released on 2nd August, 2021)[/inside] is the outcome of a two-part series of online consultative meetings hosted by National Institute of Disaster Management (NIDM, Delhi). These working group consultative meetings largely included &nbsp;stakeholders from diverse backgrounds -- Central &nbsp;Government, State &nbsp;Governments, Civil Society Organisations (CSOs), social workers, humanitarians, academicians, scientists and researchers. Drawing lessons from the first and second waves, through the deliberations by leading experts during these meetings, the NIDM has been able to produce in the form of final outcome, recommendations for the preparedness of the third wave on the issues related to children and women and their well-being. Kindly <a href="/upload/files/NIDM%20report.pdf">click here</a> to access the report.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The consultative meetings held by NIDM with various stakeholders strongly recommended: a home care model, ramping up of vaccination especially for parents, nurses and other front-line workers, immediate recruitment of healthcare staffs and medical facilities for children, guarantee food security especially for the vulnerable amongst vulnerable, strengthen the community level engagement and risk awareness and communication, zero tolerance towards sexual abuse of children and women and raising awareness through a massive public outreach campaign. There is a huge gap between urban and rural India in terms of awareness, digitisation and medical facilities. It seems like the pandemic outbreak has only exacerbated social inequities and highlighted shortcomings of our society. Hence, the government must prioritise rural India and vulnerable groups in order to cope with the ongoing pandemic. This special report also outlines the women-children complementarity, suggesting that a child&rsquo;s inclusive growth largely depends on that of the mother.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">---</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> The <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/Inequality%20Report%202021%20Indias%20Unequal%20Healthcare%20Story.pdf">report</a> titled Inequality Report 2021: India&#39;s Unequal Healthcare Story examines the status of inequality across various indicators of health among different sections of the population from 2005-06 to 2015-16. The report analyses the government interventions made in terms of health programmes and its impact on health inequality. It also includes ground experiences of people, particularly the marginalised groups, during the pandemic.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The key findings of the [inside]Oxfam India&#39;s Inequality Report 2021: India&#39;s Unequal Healthcare Story (released on 19th July, 2021)[/inside] are as follows (please <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/Inequality%20Report%202021%20Indias%20Unequal%20Healthcare%20Story.pdf">click here</a> to access):&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Growing socio-economic inequalities in India are disproportionately affecting health outcomes of marginalised groups due to the absence of Universal Health Coverage (UHC), reveals Oxfam <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/Inequality%20Report%202021%20Indias%20Unequal%20Healthcare%20Story.pdf">India&rsquo;s Inequality Report</a> <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/Inequality%20Report%202021%20Indias%20Unequal%20Healthcare%20Story.pdf">2021: India&rsquo;s Unequal Healthcare Story</a>.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The new <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/Inequality%20Report%202021%20Indias%20Unequal%20Healthcare%20Story.pdf">report</a> by Oxfam India provides a comprehensive analysis of the health outcomes across different socioeconomic groups to gauge the level of health inequality that persists in the country. The report shows the general category performs better than Scheduled Castes-SCs and Scheduled Tribes-STs; Hindus perform better than Muslims; the rich perform better than the poor; men are better off than women; and the urban population is better off than the rural population on various health indicators. The COVID-19 pandemic has further exacerbated these inequalities.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The public healthcare system in India with its weak and understaffed infrastructure has been overburdened with the consistently rising cases. Private healthcare providers, on the other hand, were charging exorbitant prices, preventing the middle-class and the poor from getting diagnosed and treated until the government intervened to cap their prices. Even then, private healthcare has remained inaccessible to the poor while the rich have easily availed its services. As such, the poor and the vulnerable have mostly been dependent on the overburdened public healthcare facilities &mdash; with insufficient number of beds and inadequate human resources &mdash; for treatment or have gone without being diagnosed and treated.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Health inequalities are linked to and reflect socio-economic inequalities. Often times, it is the socio-economically marginalised communities that suffer from ill-health the most. The ongoing pandemic has revealed that the health systems in most countries are under-prepared to cope with any major health emergency and its unequal impact on the have and the have-nots.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Over the last few decades, India has made great progress in healthcare provisioning. Yet, progressively, the trend has been towards supporting the growth of the private sector in healthcare. This growth has only exacerbated the existing inequalities leaving the poor and the marginalised with no viable healthcare provisions. High costs of health services and lack of quality leads to further impoverishment of the disadvantaged.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The private health sector provided only 5-10 percent of total patient care when India gained independence. Today, it accounts for 66 percent of hospitalization and non-hospitalization cases and 33 percent of institutional births. This growth has been boosted by government concessions and has attracted domestic and foreign companies to set up tertiary care and super speciality hospitals. Within the country, the private formal sector has a distinct customer base. They are the urban-rich. Dehury et al. writes that private hospitals &lsquo;cater to a pool of patient community having health insurance, corporate tie-ups and referrals from general physicians. Usually, the paying capacity of these patients [are] higher than the common Indian citizen&hellip;these hospitals cater to the Indian elite class and organized sector workers having all financial protection.&rsquo;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The private sector is geared towards profits whereas the public provisioning of health services ensures that the poor and the marginalised have equal access to quality healthcare services closer to home. India&rsquo;s public health provisioning has, however, been weak. The public expenditure on health by the central government as a percentage of GDP was a mere 0.32 percent in 2019-20.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The combined expenditure by state and central government was about 1.16 percent of the GDP in 2019, rising marginally by 0.02 percent from 2018 &mdash; falling far behind the goal of making health expenditure 2.5 percent of the GDP. The per capita health expenditure is highest in Arunachal Pradesh at INR 9,854 and lowest in Bihar at INR 697. In the 2021-22 budget, the health ministry has been allocated a total of INR 76,901 crore, a decline of 9.8 percent from the revised estimates of 2020-21 at INR 85,250 crore.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Public funds for health has also been invested specifically in secondary and tertiary care rather than in the provisioning of primary healthcare. &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The public sector has prioritized secondary and tertiary care over primary care. Yet, experts acknowledge that primary care is the cornerstone of achieving equitable delivery and access to quality healthcare by all. While focus has been put on achieving Universal Healthcare in India; the government has selectively adopted the insurance model as a way to universalise healthcare instead of enhancing the primary health care system. As such, access to good quality public healthcare has remained fragmented and India is still far away from achieving universal coverage. The rich can avail healthcare from high-end private providers but the poor are stuck with a difficult choice. They either have to incur debts by availing health care from private providers or depend on a poor public healthcare system.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The Planning Commission in 2011 had observed that expenditure in secondary and tertiary care was drawing away attention from primary health services. Research studies substantiate this position and it is argued that &lsquo;[s]ubstantial proportions of the health budgets have been spent on&hellip;high-end tertiary medical services &mdash; all of which largely benefits the middle classes and detracts from the provision of public health services.&rsquo; Studies have also attributed India&rsquo;s high disease burden to the government&rsquo;s exclusive focus on the urban-oriented curative medical model. The government&rsquo;s focus on &lsquo;a heavily medicalized and hightech curative medical interventions&rsquo;&nbsp;has derailed the goal to make quality and affordable public healthcare accessible to all irrespective of their ability to pay. The result has been a widening of health inequalities along caste, class, gender and geography.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; To make the goals of National Health Mission (NRHM and National Urban Health Mission were subsumed under the NHM in 2013) a reality, there needs to be a strong public health infrastructure in place, even in hard-to-reach areas. Sufficient medical supplies, equipment, drugs and trained medical staff in health centres should be the standard. On the contrary, public health centres remain understaffed with limited supplies.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Among other things, the Inequality Report 2021 on health has recommended the government to increase health spending to 2.5 percent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) to ensure a more equitable health system in the country; ensure that union budgetary allocation in health for SCs and STs is proportionate to their population; prioritize primary health by ensuring that two-thirds of the health budget is allocated for strengthening primary healthcare; state governments to allocate their expenditure on health to 2.5 percent of Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP); the centre should extend financial support to the states with low per capita health expenditure to reduce inter-state inequality in health. It has asked to widen the ambit of insurance schemes to include out-patient care. The major expenditures on health happen through out-patient costs as consultations, diagnostic tests, medicines, etc. While the report does not endorse Government-financed Health Insurance Schemes (GFHIS) as a way to achieve UHC and stresses that insurance can only be a component of it, it is imperative that GFHIS widens its ambit to include outpatient costs as a way to reduce out-of-pocket expenditure (OOPE).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The Constitution of India does not guarantee a fundamental right to health though it does refer to the role of the government in the provisioning of healthcare to all its citizens. Therefore, the right to health should be enacted as a fundamental right that makes it obligatory for the government to ensure equal access to timely, acceptable, and affordable healthcare of appropriate quality, and address the underlying determinants of health to close the gap in health outcomes between the rich and poor.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; With the lockdown aimed at checking the spread of COVID-19, health systems prioritized services related only to COVID-19. Human and material resources like hospitals, beds and intensive care units were diverted towards the management and treatment of COVID-19 patients. Health services catering to non-Covid illnesses were halted, leading to unprecedented hardships and sufferings for chronic patients and those requiring immediate medical intervention such as pregnant women. Accessibility to non-Covid medical services were grimmer for patients in rural and hard-to-reach areas as compared to urban areas due to the unavailability of health centres in the vicinity and the lack of transportation facilities.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Disruptions in the availability of drugs for non-communicable diseases (NCD), tuberculosis (TB), contraceptive and other essential services were also reported. Telemedicine &mdash; the practice of caring for patients remotely &mdash; for which guidelines were issued by the Government of India in March 2020 to facilitate access to medical advice made consultations easier. However, for those with no smart phones and internet connectivity, particularly in rural and hard-to-reach areas, seeking medical advice remained a difficult task. The immunization drive was also disrupted. India vaccinates around 20 million children every year and its disruption might add to the largest number of unimmunized children in the world.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The National Health Profile in 2017 recorded one government allopathic doctor for every 10,189 people and one state-run hospital for every 90,343 people. India also ranks the lowest in the number of hospital beds per thousand population among the BRICS nations &mdash; Russia scores the highest (7.12), followed by China (4.3), South Africa (2.3), Brazil (2.1) and India (0.5). India also ranks lower than some of the lesser developed countries such as Bangladesh (0.87), Chile (2.11) and Mexico (0.98).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The current expenditure on health, by the Centre and the state governments combined, is only about 1.25 percent of GDP which is the lowest among the BRICS countries &mdash; Brazil (9.2) has the highest allocation, followed by South Africa (8.1), Russia (5.3) and China (5.0). It is also lower than some of its neighbouring countries such as Bhutan (2.5 percent) and Sri Lanka (1.6 percent). The low priority given to health expenditure is also reflected in the share in total expenditure of the government, which is only 4 percent whereas the global average stands at 11 percent. In Oxfam&rsquo;s Commitment to Reducing Inequality Report 2020, India ranks 154th in health spending, fifth from the bottom. This poor spending is reflected in the inadequate health resources and infrastructure. Only around 50,069 health and wellness centres (HWCs), which are envisaged to deliver comprehensive primary healthcare (CPHC) closer to homes, are functional. These centres are only 65 percent of the cumulative target for 2020-21. Moreover, in 2019, less than 10 percent of PHCs were funded as per IPHS norms whereas the rest remained underfunded.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Different studies have proved that low public health expenditure yields worse health outcomes. Studies by Barenberg et al. investigated the impact of public health expenditure on Infant Mortality Rate (IMR) and found a negative relationship between the two. Farahani et al. evaluated the relationship between state-level public health spending of India and individual mortality across all age groups using household-level data from the third National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3) showing that a 10 percent increase in public spending on health decreases mortality by about 2 percent, with effects mainly concentrated on women, the young, and the elderly.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The out-of-pocket health expenditure of 64.2 percent in India is higher than the world average of 18.2 percent. Exorbitant prices of healthcare has forced many to sell household assets and incur debts.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The global average for life expectancy is 72.6 years but India (69.42) remains below the global average. It is also lower than the neighbouring countries Nepal (70.8), Bhutan (71.8), Bangladesh (72.6), and Sri Lanka (77) and its BRICS counterparts Brazil (75.9), China (76.9), and Russia (72.6).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; A comprehensive provisioning of public health as water, sanitation and primary healthcare is the most efficient and cost-effective way to achieve UHC around the world.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Evidence from Thailand and Sri Lanka, which have performed better than India with regard to universal access to healthcare, shows that these countries have a high public provisioning of services. Also, evidence from developed countries like Germany, Sweden, Canada and developing countries like Costa Rica reveal that successful insurance-based healthcare system was attained with high levels of public spending and government provisioning of healthcare services.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The Oxfam India <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/Inequality%20Report%202021%20Indias%20Unequal%20Healthcare%20Story.pdf">report</a> says that &lsquo;Kerala invested in infrastructure to create a multi-layered health system, designed to provide first-contact access for basic services at the community level and expanded integrated primary healthcare coverage to achieve access to a range of preventive and curative services&hellip;[,] expanded the number of medical facilities, hospital beds, and doctors&hellip;[and] public health and social development initiatives&hellip; aided in creating the environment for a strong and effective primary care system.&rsquo;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="/upload/files/SOPonCOVID19Containment%26ManagementinPeriurbanRural%26tribalareas.pdf">click here</a> to access the [inside]Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) on COVID-19 Containment and Management in Peri-urban, Rural and Tribal areas[/inside] dated 16th May, 2021. The SOP was issued by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>---</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">The key findings of the report titled [inside]Rural Health Statistics 2019-20 (released in April 2021)[/inside], which has been prepared by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, are as follows (please <a href="/upload/files/Rural%20Health%20Statistics%202019-20%20report%20MoHFW%20latest%20available%282%29.pdf">click here</a> to access):</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; As on 31st March, 2020, there were 1,55,404 and 2,517 Sub Centres (SCs), 24,918 and 5,895 Primary Health Centres (PHCs) and 5,183 and 466 Community Health Centres (CHCs), respectively, which were functioning in rural and urban areas of the country.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average rural population covered by a Sub Centre was 5,729 as on 1st July, 2020, whereas the norm is that one Sub Centre should be serving a population of size in the range 300-5,000.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average population in tribal/ hilly/ desert areas covered by a Sub Centre was 3,381 as on 1st July, 2020, whereas the norm is that one Sub Centre should be serving a population of size up to 3,000 in such areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; A Sub Centre is the most peripheral and first contact point between the primary health care system and the community. Sub Centres are assigned tasks relating to interpersonal communication in order to bring about behavioral change and provide services in relation to maternal and child health, family welfare, nutrition, immunisation, diarrhoea control and control of communicable diseases programmes. Each Sub Centre is required to be manned by at least one auxiliary nurse midwife (ANM) / female health worker and one male health worker. Under the National Rural Health Mission (NRHM), there is a provision for one additional second ANM on contract basis. One lady health visitor (LHV) is entrusted with the task of supervision of six Sub Centres. The Government of India bears the salary of ANM and LHV while the salary of the Male Health Worker is borne by the state governments.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average rural population covered by a Primary Health Centre (PHC) was 35,730 as on 1st July, 2020, whereas the norm is that one Primary Health Centre should be serving a population of size in the range 20,000-30,000.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average population in tribal/ hilly/ desert areas covered by a PHC was 23,930 as on 1st July, 2020, whereas the norm is that one PHC should be serving a population of size up to 20,000 in such areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; PHC is the first contact point between the village community and the medical officer. The PHCs were envisaged to provide an integrated curative and preventive health care to the rural population with emphasis on preventive and promotive aspects of health care. The PHCs are established and maintained by the state governments under the Minimum Needs Programme (MNP)/ Basic Minimum Services (BMS) Programme. As per minimum requirement, a PHC is to be manned by a medical officer supported by 14 paramedical and other staff. Under NRHM, there is a provision for two additional staff nurses at PHCs on contract basis. It acts as a referral unit for 6 Sub Centres and has 4-6 beds for patients. The activities of PHC involve curative, preventive, promotive and family welfare services.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average rural population covered by a Community Health Centre was 1,71,779 as on 1st July, 2020, whereas the norm is that one Community Health Centre should be serving a population of size in the range 80,000-1,20,000.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average population in tribal/ hilly/ desert areas covered by a CHC was 97,178 as on 1st July, 2020, whereas the norm is that one CHC should be serving a population of size up to 80,000 in such areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; CHCs are being established and maintained by the state government under Minimum Needs Program (MNP)/Basic Minimum Services (BMS) programme. As per minimum norms, a CHC is required to be manned by four medical specialists i.e. surgeon, physician, gynecologist and pediatrician supported by 21 paramedical and other staff. It has 30 indoor beds with one OT, X-ray, labour room and laboratory facilities. It serves as a referral centre for 4 PHCs and also provides facilities for obstetric care and specialist consultations.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em>Rural Health Care System in India</em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Out of the sanctioned posts, a significant percentage of posts were vacant at all the levels. Nearly 14.1 percent of the sanctioned posts of Health Worker (Female)/ ANM (at SCs +PHCs) were vacant as compared to 37 percent vacancies of Health Worker (Male) in 2020. At PHCs, 37.6 percent of the sanctioned posts of Health Assistant (Male + Female) and 24.1 percent of the sanctioned posts of Doctors were vacant in 2020.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The availability of manpower is one of the important prerequisites for the efficient functioning of the Rural Health services. As on 31st March, 2020, the overall shortfall (which excludes the existing surplus in some of the states) in the posts of Health Worker (Female) / ANM was 2 percent of the total requirement as per the norm of one HW(F)/ ANM per Sub Centre and PHC. The overall shortfall was mainly due to the shortfall in states of Gujarat (1073), Himachal Pradesh (992), Rajasthan (657), Tripura (389) and Kerala (277). Similarly, in case of Health Worker (Male), there was a shortfall of 65.5 percent of the requirement.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; PHC is the first contact point between the village community and the Medical Officer. Manpower in PHC includes a Medical Officer supported by paramedical and other staff. In the case of PHC, for Health Assistant (male + female), the shortfall was 71.9 percent. For allopathic doctors at PHC, there was a shortfall of 6.8 percent of the total requirement at all India level. This shortfall happened due to a significant shortfall of doctors at PHCs in the states of Odisha (461), Chhattisgarh (404), Rajasthan (249), Madhya Pradesh (134), Uttar Pradesh (121) and Karnataka (105).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The Community Health Centres provide specialised medical care of Surgeons, Obstetricians &amp; Gynecologists, Physicians and Pediatricians. The latest available position of specialists manpower at CHCs as on 31st March, 2020 shows that out of the sanctioned posts, 68.4 percent of Surgeons, 56.1 percent of Obstetricians &amp; Gynecologists, 66.8 percent of physicians and 63.1 percent of pediatricians were vacant. Overall 63.3 percent of the sanctioned posts of specialists at CHCs were vacant. Moreover, as compared to requirements for existing infrastructure, there was a shortfall of 78.9 percent of Surgeons, 69.7 percent of Obstetricians &amp; Gynecologists, 78.2 percent of Physicians and 78.2 percent of Pediatricians. Overall, there was a shortfall of 76.1 percent of specialists at the CHCs as compared to the requirement for existing CHCs. The shortfall of specialists was significantly high in most of the states. However, in addition to the specialists, about 15,342 General Duty Medical Officers (GDMOs) Allopathic and 702 AYUSH Specialists along with 2,720 GDMO AYUSH were also available at CHCs as on 31st March, 2020. In addition to this, there were 890 Anaesthetists and 301 Eye Surgeons available at CHCs as on 31st March, 2020.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Comparison of the manpower position of major categories in 2020 with that in 2019 shows an overall decrease in the number of ANMs at SCs &amp; PHCs and Doctors at PHCs during the period. However, there was an increase in the number of Specialists at CHCs. The number of Specialists at CHCs had increased from 3,881 in 2019 to 4,857 in 2020, which was an increase of 27.7 percent.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Considering the status of paramedical staff, there was an increase of Lab Technicians from 18,715 in 2019 to 19,903 in 2020 at PHCs and CHCs. There was a marginal decrease in the number of pharmacists from 26,204 in 2019 to 25,792 in 2020. A significant decrease was also observed in nursing staff under PHC &amp; CHCs from 80,976 in 2019 to 71,847 in 2020. The number of radiographers had increased marginally from 2,419 in 2019 to 2,434 in 2020.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; A total of 1,193 Sub Divisional/ Sub District Hospitals were functioning as on 31st March, 2020 throughout the country. In these hospitals, 13,399 doctors were available. In addition to these doctors, about 29,937 paramedical staff were also available at those hospitals as on 31st March, 2020. The number of doctors in Sub Divisional/ Sub District Hospitals had reduced from 13,750 in 2019 to 13,399 in 2020. The number of paramedical staff in Sub Divisional/ Sub District Hospitals fell from 36,909 in 2019 to 29,937 in 2020.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In addition to above, 810 District Hospitals (DHs) were also functioning as on 31st March, 2020 throughout the country. There were 22,827 doctors available in the DHs. In addition to the doctors, about 80,920 paramedical staff were also available at District Hospitals as on 31st March, 2020. The number of doctors in District Hospitals went down from 24,676 in 2019 to 22,827 in 2020. The number of paramedical staff in District Hospitals fell from 85,194 in 2019 to 80,920 in 2020.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; As per the Health &amp; Wellness Centre (HWC) portal data, there were a total of 38,595 HWCs functional in India as on 31st March 2020. In total, 18,610 SCs had been converted into HWC-SCs. Also at the level of PHC, a total of 19,985 PHCs had been converted into HWC-PHCs. Out of 19,985 HWC-PHCs, 16,635 PHCs had been converted into HWCs in rural areas and 3,350 in urban areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">**page**</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">Kindly <a href="/upload/files/LASI_India_Factsheet.pdf">click here</a> to access the [inside]India Fact Sheet of Longitudinal Ageing Study in India (LASI) -- Wave-1 (released in 2021)[/inside], An Investigation of Health, Economic, and Social Well-being of India&rsquo;s Growing Elderly Population, India Report 2020, prepared by International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), National Programme for Health Care Elderly (NPHCE), Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health (HSPH), University&nbsp; of Southern California (USC) and Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MoHFW).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="/upload/files/LASI_India_Executive_Summary.pdf">click here</a> to read the [inside]Executive Summary of Longitudinal Ageing Study in India (LASI) -- Wave-1 (released in 2021)[/inside].</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>---</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to the report entitled [inside]A Neglected Tragedy: The global burden of stillbirths -- Report of the UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation, 2020 (released in October 2020)[/inside] (please click <a href="https://www.im4change.org/upload/files/UN-IGME-the-global-burden-of-stillbirths-2020.pdf">here</a> to access):</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; About one stillbirth occurs every 16 seconds, which means that every year, about 2 million babies are stillborn i.e. showing no signs of life at birth. It means every day, almost 5,400 babies are stillborn. Globally, one in 72 babies is stillborn.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In the past two decades, 48 million babies were stillborn. Three-in-four stillbirths occur in sub-Saharan Africa or Southern Asia. Low and lower-middle income countries account for 84 percent of all stillbirths but only 62 percent of all live births.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Stillbirths are largely absent in worldwide data tracking, rendering the true extent of the problem hidden. They are invisible in policies and programmes and underfinanced as an area requiring intervention. Targets specific to stillbirths were absent from the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and are still missing in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; There are a variety of reasons behind the slow reduction in stillbirth rates: absence of or poor quality of care during pregnancy and birth; lack of investment in preventative interventions and the health workforce; inadequate social recognition of stillbirths as a burden on families; measurement challenges and major data gaps; absence of global and national leadership; and no established global targets, such as the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Globally, an estimated 42 percent of all stillbirths are intrapartum (i.e., the baby died during labour); almost all of these 832,000 stillborn deaths that occurred in 2019 could have been prevented with access to high-quality care during childbirth, including ongoing intrapartum monitoring and timely intervention in case of complications.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Around 20 million babies are projected to be stillborn in the next decade, if trends observed between 2000 and 2019 in reducing the stillbirth rate continue. Among the 20 million, 2.9 million stillbirths could be prevented by accelerating progress to meet the ENAP target in the 56 countries at risk to miss the goal. Every Newborn Action Plan (ENAP) calls for each country to achieve a rate of 12 stillbirths or fewer per 1,000 total births by 2030 and to close equity gaps.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In the first two decades of this century (i.e. 2000-2019), the annual rate of reduction (ARR) in the stillbirth rate was just -2.3 percent, compared to a -2.9 percent reduction in neonatal mortality and -4.3 percent among children aged 1&ndash;59 months. Meanwhile, between 2000 and 2017, maternal mortality decreased by -2.9 percent.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In the year 2000, the ratio of the number of stillbirths to the number of under-five deaths was 0.30; by 2019, it had increased to 0.38. So, stillbirths are an increasingly critical global health problem.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; National stillbirth rates around the globe ranged from 1.4 to 32.2 stillbirths per 1,000 total births in 2019. Sub-Saharan Africa, followed by Southern Asia, had the highest stillbirth rate and the greatest number of stillbirths.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Six countries bore the burden of half of all stillbirths of the world &ndash; India, Pakistan, Nigeria, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, China and Ethiopia, in order of burden (highest to lowest).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Nearly 3,40,622 of the 19,66,000&nbsp; stillbirths globally in 2019 were in India, making it the country with the largest such burden (i.e. 17.33 percent).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2019, India, Pakistan and Nigeria alone accounted for one-third of the total burden of stillbirths and 27 percent of live births.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Stillbirth rate is defined as the ratio of the number of still births per 1,000 live births and stillbirths taken together (i.e. total births).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Some progress has been made in preventing stillbirths. Globally, the stillbirth rate declined by 35 percent since 2000. Since 2000, the stillbirth rate declined by 44 percent in Central and Southern Asia, 53 percent in India, 52 percent in Kazakhstan and 44 percent in Nepal.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Among the lower-middle income countries, stillbirth rate fell by 39 percent since 2000. Since the year 2000, stillbirth rate in lower-middle income countries like Mongolia, India and El Salvador declined by 57 percent, 53 percent and 50 percent, respectively.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; A total of 14 countries &ndash; including three low- and lower middle income countries (Cambodia, India, Mongolia) &ndash; slashed the stillbirth rate by more than half during 2000-2019.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The top 15 countries with the greatest percentage decline in the stillbirth rate during 2000&ndash;2019 are China (63 percent), Turkey (63 percent), Georgia (62 percent), North Macedonia (62 percent), Belarus (60 percent), Mongolia (57 percent), Netherlands (55 percent), Azerbaijan (53 percent), Estonia (53 percent), India (53 percent), Kazakhstan (52 percent), Romania (52 percent), El Salvador (50 percent), Peru (48 percent) and Latvia (46 percent).<br /> &nbsp;<br /> &bull; India&#39;s stillbirth rate (i.e. (stillbirths per 1,000 total births) in 2000 was 29.6, in 2010 was 20.2 and in 2019 was 13.9. The percentage decline in India&#39;s stillbirth rate during 2000&ndash;2019 was -53.0 percent. The annual rate of reduction (ARR) in stillbirth rate during 2000-2019 was -4.0 percent.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The total number of stillbirths in India was 852,386 in 2000, 535,683 in 2010 and 340,622 in 2019. The percentage decline in stillbirths during 2000&ndash;2019 was -60.0 percent. The annual rate of reduction (ARR) in total number of stillbirths during 2000&ndash;2019 was -4.8 percent. India witnessed 24,116,000 livebirths and 24,457,000 total births in 2019. &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Women in sub-Saharan Africa and Southern Asia bear the greatest burden of stillbirths in the world. More than three quarters of estimated stillbirths in 2019 occurred in these two regions, with 42 percent of the global total in sub-Saharan Africa and 34 percent in Southern Asia.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2019, stillbirth rate per 1,000 total births in Afghanistan was 28.4 (total stillbirth in 2019: 35,384), Bangladesh was 24.3 (total stillbirth in 2019: 72,508), Bhutan was 9.7 (total stillbirth in 2019: 127), China was 5.5 (total stillbirth in 2019: 92,170), India was 13.9 (total stillbirth in 2019: 340,622), Maldives was 5.8 (total stillbirth in 2019: 41), Myanmar was 14.1 (total stillbirth in 2019: 13,493), Nepal was 17.5 (total stillbirth in 2019: 9,997), Pakistan was 30.6 (total stillbirth in 2019: 190,483) and Sri Lanka was 5.8 (total stillbirth in 2019: 1,943).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Data are essential to understanding the burden of stillbirths and identifying where, when and why they occur.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Immediate actions are needed to strengthen data systems and their ability to collect, analyses and use timely, quality and disaggregated stillbirth data. To improve stillbirth data availability and quality, it is recommended that countries and relevant stakeholders:</p> <p style="text-align:justify">a. Align the stillbirth definition and measures with international standards<br /> b.&nbsp; Integrate stillbirth-specific components within relevant plans for data system strengthening and improvement<br /> c. Record stillbirth outcomes in all relevant maternal and newborn health programs, including routine HMIS (registers and monthly reporting forms)<br /> d. Provide training and support to include stillbirths within civil and vital registration systems as the coverage of these systems increases<br /> e. Include information on timing of stillbirth (antepartum or intrapartum) in all settings and record causes and contributing factors to stillbirth where possible<br /> f. Report and review stillbirth data locally &ndash; at facility or district level &ndash; alongside data on neonatal deaths (by day of death) to reduce incentives for misreporting of outcomes, and to monitor potential misclassification.<br /> g. Collate reported stillbirth rate data up the data system to a national level to enable tracking of progress towards the ENAP target of 12 stillbirths or fewer per 1,000 total births in every country by 2030 and to enable monitoring of geographical inequities.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Ending preventable stillbirths is among the core goals of the UN&rsquo;s Global Strategy for Women&rsquo;s, Children&rsquo;s and Adolescents&rsquo; Health (2016&ndash;2030) and the Every Newborn Action Plan (ENAP). These global initiatives aim to reduce the stillbirth rate to 12 or fewer third trimester (late) stillbirths per 1,000 total births in every country by 2030.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The stillbirth rate (SBR) is defined as the number of babies born with no signs of life at 28 weeks or more of gestation, per 1,000 total births. The stillbirth rate is calculated as: SBR = 1000 * {sb/(sb+lb)}, where &#39;sb&#39; refers to the number of stillbirths &ge; 28 weeks or more of gestational age; and &#39;lb&#39; refers to the number of live births regardless of gestational age or birthweight.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> <strong><em>[Shivangini Piplani, who is doing her MA in Finance and Investment (1st year) from Berlin School of Business and Innovation, assisted the Inclusive Media for Change team in preparing the summary of &#39;A Neglected Tragedy: The global burden of stillbirths -- Report of the UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation, 2020.&#39; She did this work as part of her winter internship at the Inclusive Media for Change project in December 2020.]</em></strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> The Sample Registration System (SRS) is carried out by the Office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner, India with the goal of providing accurate annual estimates of birth rates, death rates, child mortality rates and many other indices of pregnancy and fertility and mortality. The SRS has been providing data for the estimation of various mortality measures since its inception. The report provides mortality indices at the national and state levels, as well as death rates at the sub-state, viz. NSS Natural Division Level. &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The key findings of [inside]Sample Registration System Statistical Report 2018 (released in June 2020)[/inside], published by the Office of the Registrar General &amp; Census Commissioner, are as follows (please <a href="/upload/files/SRS_Statistical_Report_2018.pdf"><span style="background-color:#ffffff">click here</span></a> to access):</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Crude Death Rate (CDR)</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Crude Death Rate (CDR), which is defined as the number of deaths in a year per thousand population, at the national level, stood at 6.2 in 2018. It was 6.7 in rural areas and 5.1 in urban areas. For all bigger states/ UTs, except West Bengal, the CDR in rural areas was higher than that in urban areas. For West Bengal, CDR in rural (CDR 5.6) and urban (CDR 5.7) areas were almost identical, which makes the state the closest to the Line of Equity vis-&agrave;-vis other states/ UTs.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; States that exhibited large differences between urban CDR and rural CDR in 2018 were: Telangana (3 points), Punjab (2.6), Tamil Nadu (2.5), Andhra Pradesh (2.4), Karnataka (2.4), Chhattisgarh (2.3 points) and Himachal Pradesh (2.3). The difference is calculated as Rural CDR - Urban CDR = Difference in CDRs.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The top 5 states with the highest CDRs in 2018 were: Chhattisgarh (8.0), Odisha (7.3), Kerala (6.9), Himachal Pradesh (6.9) and Andhra Pradesh (6.7).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Between the periods 2006-08 and 2016-18, the average CDR at the national level changed by &ndash;14.9 percentage points. Between the above-said time points, CDR declined for all states, except Kerala, which showed an increase of 6 percentage points possibly due to the changes in age structure of its population.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Infant Mortality Rate (IMR)</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Infant Mortality Rate (IMR) is defined as the number of infant (less than one year of age) deaths per one thousand live births during the year.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; IMR has seen a substantial decline over the years, from 129 per 1000 live births in 1971 to 110 in 1981 and from 80 in 1991 to 32 in 2018.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; At the national level, IMR was 36.8 in rural areas and 22.9 in urban areas during the period 2016-18. However, IMR was 36 in rural areas and 23 in urban areas in 2018.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2018, Kerala had the lowest IMR of 7 and Madhya Pradesh had the highest IMR of 48.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2018, at the national level, IMR among male infants stood at 32, while that for female infants it was 33.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; For the year 2018, in all states except Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Delhi, Gujarat, Haryana, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Odisha, Punjab, Tamil Nadu, Telangana and Uttarakhand, female infants experienced a higher mortality rate as compared to male infants.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2018, Jharkhand had the highest difference between male IMR (27) and female IMR (34), followed by Bihar with a large difference between male IMR (30) and female IMR (35). As opposed to that, in Madhya Pradesh male IMR (51) exceeded female IMR (46).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2018, Assam witnessed the highest inequity between rural and urban IMRs with its rural IMR at 44 and urban IMR at 20. States like West Bengal (Urban IMR 20, Rural IMR 22), Punjab (Urban IMR 19, Rural IMR 21), Uttarakhand (Urban IMR 29, Rural IMR 31) and Bihar (Urban IMR 30, Rural IMR 32) had the least inequity between rural and urban IMR.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Between 2006-08 and 2016-18, the average IMR declined by -40.3 percent. In rural areas, decline in IMR between the above-said time points ranged from -63.9 percentage points in Delhi to -32.2 percentage points in Chhattisgarh. The highest fall in IMR in urban areas between the above-said time points was noticed in Delhi i.e. -56.4 percent.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Neonatal Mortality Rate</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Neo-natal Mortality Rate (NMR) is defined as the number of infant (less than 29 days) deaths per one thousand live births during the year.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2018, at the national level, NMR was 23, while in rural and urban areas, they were 27 and 14, respectively.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2018, NMR was the lowest in Kerala at 5 and highest in Madhya Pradesh at 35.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; At the national level, the percentage of neo-natal deaths to total infant deaths was 71.7 percent in 2018, and it was 60.1 percent in urban areas and 74.4 percent in rural areas. It means that most infants die when they are not even 30 days old.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Perinatal Mortality Rate</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Peri-natal mortality rate (PMR) is defined as the number of still births and infant deaths of less than 7 days per 1,000 live births (LB) and still births (SB) taken together during the year.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; At the national level, PMR has been estimated to be 22 in 2018. It was 25 in rural areas and 14 in urban areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2018, Madhya Pradesh had the highest PMR at 30 and Kerala had the lowest PMR at 10.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Still Birth Rate</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Still Birth Rate (SBR) is defined as the ratio of the number of still births per one thousand live births and still births taken together.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; At the national level, the SBR has been estimated to be 4 in 2018.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2018, the highest SBR has been estimated for Odisha (10) and lowest have been estimated for Jammu and Kashmir and Jharkhand (i.e. 1 each).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Under-five Mortality Rate (U5MR)</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Under-five Mortality Rate (U5MR) is the probability of dying between birth and exactly age 5, expressed per 1,000 live births.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; At the national level, U5MR has been estimated to be 36 in 2018. In urban areas, the U5MR in 2018 has been estimated to be 26 while in rural areas, it has been estimated to be 40.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Estimated U5MR was the lowest in Kerala at 10 and was the highest in Madhya Pradesh at 56.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; At the national level, female U5MR (37) was higher than the male U5MR (36) in 2018.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2018, female U5MRs were higher than that of male U5MR in all states except in Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Delhi, Gujarat, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Odisha, Punjab, Tamil Nadu and Uttarakhand.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Age-Specific Mortality Rates (ASMR)</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Age-specific Mortality Rate (ASMR), is defined as the number of deaths in a particular age-group per thousand population of the same age-group during the year.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong><em>5-14 Age Group</em></strong><br /> &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;<br /> &bull; At the national level, the ASDR for the 5-14 age group has been estimated to be 0.5 in 2018.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2018, the lowest ASDR for the 5-14 age group was found for Kerala and Assam (0.2 each) and the highest ASDR for the 5-14 age group was observed in case of Bihar, Odisha, Madhya and Chhattisgarh (0.7 each).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; At the national level, although ASDR for the 5-14 age group was the same for males and females in urban areas (0.4 each), ASDR for the 5-14 age group among females was 0.6 and among males was 0.5 in rural areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong><em>15-59 Age Group</em></strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; At the national level, ASDR for the 15-59 age group has been estimated to be 3.2 in rural areas and 2.3 in urban areas. At the national level, the ASDR for the 15-59 age group was 2.9 in 2018.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2018, the female ASDR for the 15-59 age group was lower than that of male ASDR for the 15-59 age group in all the states.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong><em>60 and Above Age Group</em></strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; At the national level, ASDR for the 60 and above age group has been estimated to be 42.6.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; ASDR for the 60 and above age group among males (45.9) was greater than that among females (39.5). The same trend existed for rural and urban areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; ASDR for the 60 and above age group has been estimated to be the highest in Chhattisgarh (58.9) and lowest in Delhi (28.3).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Sex Ratio at Birth (SRB)</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Sex Ratio at Birth (SRB) is defined as the number of female births per 1000 male births during the year.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The 3 years&rsquo; average of SRB (in the period 2016-18) has been estimated to be 899. At the national level, it was 900 in rural areas and 897 in urban areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; For 2016-18, the average SRB was the highest in Chhattisgarh at 958 and it was the lowest in Uttarakhand at 840.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In rural areas, Chhattisgarh had the highest SRB of 976 and Haryana had the lowest SRB of 840 in the period 2016-18. &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In urban areas, Madhya Pradesh had the highest SRB of 968 and Uttarakhand had the lowest SRB at 810 in the period 2016-18.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong><em>[Meghana Myadam and Sakhi Arun Jagdale, who are doing their MA in Development Studies (1st year) from Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Hyderabad, assisted the Inclusive Media for Change team in preparing the summary of the report by the Office of the Registrar General &amp; Census Commissioner<em>.</em> They did this work as part of their summer internship at the Inclusive Media for Change project in July 2020.]</em></strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="/upload/files/FAQ.pdf">click here</a> to access the [inside]FAQ on COVID-19 prepared by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare[/inside].</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="/upload/files/Containment%20Plan%20for%20Large%20Outbreaks%20of%20COVID19%20Final.pdf">click here</a> to access the [inside]Containment Plan for Large Outbreaks Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019[/inside] (COVID-19), which has been prepared by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">---</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/Background-Paper-COVID19.pdf">click here</a> to read the [inside]Background Note on COVID-19[/inside], which was prepared by Jan Swasthya Abhiyan (JSA) and All India People&rsquo;s Science Network(AIPSN), dated 16th March, 2020.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/Statement-COVID19.pdf">click here</a> to read the [inside]Statement on the COVID-19 pandemic[/inside], which was released by Jan Swasthya Abhiyan (JSA) and All India People&rsquo;s Science Network(AIPSN) on 16th March, 2020.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">---</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/High%20Level%20group%20of%20Health%20Sector.pdf" title="High Level group of Health Sector">click here</a> to access the Report of the [inside]High Level Group on Health Sector (2019), submitted to the Fifteenth Finance Commission of India[/inside]. The members of the High Level Group on Health were Dr. Randeep Guleria, Dr. Devi Shetty, Dr. Dileep Govind Mhaisekar, Dr. Naresh Trehan, Dr. Bhabatosh Biswas and Prof. K Srinath Reddy.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">---</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Press%20Note%20NSS%2075th%20Round%20Report%20Key%20Indicators%20of%20Social%20Consumption%20in%20India%20Health%20July%202017%20to%20June%202018%20released%20on%2023rd%20November%202019.pdf" title="Press Note NSS 75th Round Report Key Indicators of Social Consumption in India Health July 2017 to June 2018 released on 23rd November 2019">click here</a> to access the major findings of [inside]NSS 75th Round Report: Key Indicators of Social Consumption in India: Health, July 2017 to June 2018 (released on 23rd November 2019)[/inside].<br /> <br /> Kindly <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Key%20Indicators%20of%20Social%20Consumption%20in%20India%20Health.pdf" title="Key Indicators of Social Consumption in India Health">click here</a> to access the NSS 75th Round Report: Key Indicators of Social Consumption in India: Health, July 2017 to June 2018 (released on 23rd November 2019).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <div style="text-align:justify">The key findings of the [inside]2019 India TB report (released in September 2019)[/inside], which has been produced by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, are as follows (please <a href="https://tbcindia.gov.in/WriteReadData/India%20TB%20Report%202019.pdf">click here</a> and <a href="https://tbcindia.gov.in/index1.php?lang=1&amp;level=1&amp;sublinkid=4160&amp;lid=2807">click here</a> to access):</div> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> &bull; The country accounted for a quarter of the global tuberculosis (TB) burden with an estimated 27 lakh cases in 2018.<br /> <br /> &bull; In 2018, the country was able to achieve a total notification of 21.5 lakh TB cases, of which 25 percent was from private sector. Majority of the TB burden is among the working age group. Nearly 89 percent of TB cases came from the age group 15-69 years. About two-third of the TB patients were males.<br /> <br /> &bull; Among the notified, treatment was initiated for about 19.1 lakh cases (almost 90 percent), across both public and private sectors.<br /> <br /> &bull; HIV co-infection among TB patient was nearly fifty thousand cases amounting to TB-HIV co-infection rate of 3.4 percent.<br /> <br /> &bull; In 2018, TB notification has increased to 5.37 lakhs. This is an increase by 35 percent in notification from private sector in comparison to 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; Based on private drug sales data, it could be said that in 2016 there was about 1.59 times patients in the private sector as compared to the public sector (approximately 22.7 lakh patients in total).<br /> <br /> &bull; In India about 80 percent of the outpatient care is provided by private health care providers. Considering the quantum of private sector, it necessitates to leverage their capacity to expand health coverage.<br /> <br /> &bull; TB is a notifiable disease vide 2012 as per declaration of Government of India Order. This has expanded the ambit of TB surveillance covering all public as well as private health facilities. The healthcare providers shall notify every TB cases to local authorities such as District Health Officers/ Chief Medical Officers of a district and Municipal Health Officer of a municipal corporation. This notification should be done every month. The surveillance begins with the notification, and completed with acting on the information gathered. In <a href="tinymce/uploaded/TB%20notification%20Gazette%20of%20India%20dated%2019%20March%202018.pdf" title="TB notification Gazette of India dated 19 March 2018">March 2018</a>, the notification was published in Gazette of India, making it mandatory for private providers to notify TB patients and public health system to act upon it.<br /> <br /> &bull; Uttar Pradesh, with 17 percent of population of the country, is the largest contributor to TB cases, with 20 percent of the total notifications, accounting for about 4.2 lakh cases (187 cases per lakh population).<br /> <br /> &bull; Delhi and Chandigarh stand apart from all other states and UTs with regard to notification rates relative to their resident population. Annual notification rates in Delhi and Chandigarh were 504 cases per lakh population and 496 cases per lakh population, respectively. This is because patients residing in other parts of the country are diagnosed/ notified from these two UTs.<br /> <br /> &bull; In 2018, the Revised National Tuberculosis Control Programme (RNTCP) notified 21.5 lakh TB cases, a 16 percent increase over 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; The largest ever National Drug Resistance Survey in the world for 13 anti-TB drugs has been completed and it has indicated about 6.2 percent prevalence of drug resistant TB in the country among all TB patients.<br /> <br /> &bull; The Government of India is prioritising resource allocations for TB in the country with more than Rs. 12,000 crores being invested in the implementation of the National Strategic Plan to End TB 2017-2025. The government has started the Nikshay Poshan Yojana (NPY) for nutritional support to TB patients.&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; It is expected that the country would be able to cover all TB cases through the online notification system -- NIKSHAY.<br /> &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The ending preventable maternal mortality (EPMM) target for reducing the global maternal mortality ratio (MMRatio) by 2030 was adopted as Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) target 3.1: reduce global MMRatio to less than 70 per lakh live births by 2030. Having targets for mortality reduction is important, but accurate measurement of maternal mortality remains challenging and many deaths still go uncounted. Many countries still lack well-functioning civil registration and vital statistics (CRVS) systems, and where such systems do exist, reporting errors &ndash; whether incompleteness (unregistered deaths, also known as &ldquo;missing&rdquo;) or misclassification of cause of death &ndash; continue to pose a major challenge to data accuracy. The report entitled &#39;Trends in Maternal Mortality 2000 to 2017: Estimates by World Health Orgnization (WHO), United Nations Children&#39;s Fund (UNICEF), World Bank Group, United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) and the United Nations Population Division presents internationally comparable global, regional and country-level estimates and trends for maternal mortality between 2000 and 2017.<br /> <br /> The new estimates presented in this report supersede all previously published estimates for years that fall within the same time period. Care should be taken to use only these estimates for the interpretation of trends in maternal mortality from 2000 to 2017; due to modifications in methodology and data availability, differences between these and previous estimates should not be interpreted as representing time trends. In addition, when interpreting changes in MMRatios over time, one should take into consideration that it is easier to reduce the MMRatio when the level is high than when the MMRatio level is already low.<br /> <br /> Please note that Maternal Mortality Ratio is the number of women who die&nbsp; from pregnancy-related causes while pregnant or within 42 days of pregnancy termination per 100,000 live births.<br /> <br /> The key findings of the report entitled [inside]Trends in Maternal Mortality 2000 to 2017: Estimates by WHO, UNICEF, World Bank Group, UNFPA and the United Nations Population Division (released in September 2019)[/inside] are as follows (please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Maternal%20mortality%20Levels%20and%20trends%202000%20to%202017%20Executive%20Summary.pdf" title="Maternal mortality Levels and trends 2000 to 2017 Executive Summary">click here</a> and <a href="https://www.unfpa.org/featured-publication/trends-maternal-mortality-2000-2017">click here</a> to access):&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; Nigeria and India had the highest estimated numbers of maternal deaths, accounting for approximately one-third (35 percent) of estimated&nbsp; global maternal deaths in 2017, with approximately 67,000 and 35,000 maternal deaths (23 percent and 12 percent of global maternal deaths), respectively.<br /> <br /> &bull; Maternal Mortality Ratio for India was 370 in 2000, 286 in 2005, 210 in&nbsp; 2010, 158 in 2015 and 145 in 2017. So, the MMRatio for the country reduced by almost 61 percent between 2000 and 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; MMRatio for China was 59 in 2000, 44 in 2005, 36 in 2010, 30 in 2015 and 29 in 2017. Hence, the MMRatio for China reduced by around 51 percent between 2000 and 2017.&nbsp;&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; The absolute difference in MMRatio between India and China has lessened from 311 in 2000 to 116 in 2017. The country&#39;s MMRatio&nbsp; was 6.3 times that of China in 2000, which has reduced to 5 times in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; MMRatio for Bangladesh was 434 in 2000, 343 in 2005, 258 in 2010, 200 in 2015 and 173 in 2017. Therefore, the MMRatio for Bangladesh decreased by nearly 60 percent between 2000 and 2017.&nbsp;&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; The absolute gap in MMRatio between Bangladesh and India has reduced from 64 in 2000 to 28 in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; MMRatio for Sri Lanka was 56 in 2000, 45 in 2005, 38 in 2010, 36 in 2015 and 36 in 2017. So, the MMRatio for Sri Lanka reduced by roughly 36 percent between 2000 and 2017.&nbsp;&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; MMRatio for Pakistan was 286 in 2000, 237 in 2005, 191 in 2010, 154 in 2015 and 140 in 2017. Therefore, the MMRatio for Pakistan declined by roughly 51 percent between 2000 and 2017.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; MMRatio for South Asia was 395 in 2000, 309 in 2005, 235 in 2010, 179 in 2015 and 163 in 2017. Hence, the MMRatio for South Asia reduced by around 59 percent between 2000 and 2017.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Sub-Saharan Africa and Southern Asia accounted for approximately 86 percent (2,54,000) of the estimated global maternal deaths in 2017 with sub-Saharan Africa alone accounting for roughly 66 percent (1,96,000), while Southern Asia accounted for nearly 20 percent (58,000). South-Eastern Asia, in addition, accounted for over 5 percent of global maternal deaths (16,000).<br /> &nbsp;&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to the [inside]National Health Profile 2018, 13th Issue[/inside], Central Bureau of Health Intelligence, Ministry of Health &amp; Family Welfare (please <a href="https://im4change.org/docs/900National%20Health%20Profile%202018%2013th%20Issue%20Central%20Bureau%20of%20Health%20Intelligence%20Ministry%20of%20Health%20&amp;%20Family%20Welfare.pdf">click here</a> to access):<br /> <br /> <strong>Demographic Indicators</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; The Infant Mortality Rate (IMR) per 1,000 live births has declined considerably from 74 infant deaths in 1994 to 34 infant deaths in 2016. There is a huge gap between IMR in rural areas (38 infant deaths per 1,000 live births) and urban areas (23 infant deaths per 1000 live births).<br /> <br /> &bull; Among the states, the lowest IMR per 1,000 live births in 2016 was found in Goa (8), followed by Kerala (10) and Manipur (11). The highest IMR per 1,000 live births in 2015 was found in Madhya Pradesh (47), followed by both Assam and Odisha (44 each).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The life expectancy of life at birth has increased from 49.7 years in 1970-75 to 68.3 years in 2011-15. In the period 2011-15, the life expectancy for females was 70.0 years and 66.9 years for males.<br /> <br /> &bull; In the period 2011-15, the life expectancy in the rural areas was 67.1 years and in the urban areas it was 71.9 years.<br /> <br /> &bull; The Maternal Mortality Ratio (MMRatio) per 1,00,000 livebirths has decreased from 178 maternal deaths during 2010-12 to 167 maternal deaths during 2011-13. In 2011-13, the MMRatio per 1,00,000 livebirths was the highest in Assam i.e. 300 maternal deaths and lowest in Kerala i.e. 61 maternal deaths.<br /> <br /> &bull; The country&#39;s birth rate per 1,000 estimated mid-year population has fallen from 29.5 livebirths in 1991 to 20.4 livebirths in 2016. Birth rate per 1,000 estimated mid-year population in rural areas was 22.1 livebirths and in urban areas it was 17.0 livebirths in 2016.<br /> <br /> &bull; India&#39;s natural growth rate per 1,000 mid-year population has declined from 19.7 in 1991 to 14.0 in 2016.<br /> <br /> &bull; The proportion of urban population to India&#39;s total population has increased from 25.7 percent in 1991 to 27.81 percent in 2001, and further increased to 31.14 in 2011.<br /> <br /> &bull; The country&#39;s population density has increased from 267 persons per square kilometer in 1991 to 325 persons per square kilometer in 2001, and further rose to 382 persons per square kilometer in 2011.<br /> <br /> &bull; The decadal growth rate of India&#39;s population has fallen from 23.87 percent in 1981-1991 to 21.54 percent in 1991-2001, and further declined to 17.7 percent in 2001-2011.<br /> <br /> <strong>Health Status Indicators</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; In 2017, maximum number of malaria cases was reported in Odisha (3,52,140 cases) and maximum number of deaths was reported in West Bengal (29 deaths).<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of cases of malaria has changed from 8,81,730 in 2013 to 8,42,095 in 2017. The total number of deaths due to malaria has changed from 440 in 2013 to 104 in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; Out of the overall cases of Kala-azar reported in 2017, 72 percent of the cases were reported in Bihar. The total number of cases of Kala-azar has fallen from 13,869 in 2013 to 5,758 in 2017. Likewise, the total number of deaths from Kala-azar has fallen from 20 in 2013 to zero in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; There has been a considerable fall in the number of swine flu cases/ deaths in the year 2014 (viz. 937) as compared with 2012 (viz. 5,044) &amp; 2013 (viz. 5,253). However, the number of cases (42,592) and deaths (2,990) have drastically increased in the year 2015. In 2016, the cases decreased to 1786 and again increased to 38,811 in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; A total of 63,679 cases of chikungunya were reported in 2017 as compared with 64,057 cases in 2016. Most chikungunya cases in 2017 were reported from Karnataka (32,170), followed by Gujarat (7,807) and Maharashtra (7,639).<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of cases and deaths due to chicken pox were 74,035 and 92, respectively in 2017. Kerala accounted for maximum number of cases (30,941) and West Bengal accounted for maximum number of deaths (53) due to chicken pox in 2017.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of cases of Acute Encephalitis Syndrome has increased from 7,825 in 2013 to 13,036 in 2017. The total number of deaths due to Acute Encephalitis Syndrome has decreased from 1,273 in 2013 to 1,010 in 2017. Uttar Pradesh reported maximum numbers of cases (4,749) and maximum number of deaths (593) in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of cases of Japanese Encephalitis has almost doubled from 1,086 in 2013 to 2,180 in 2017. The total number of deaths due to Japanese Encephalitis has increased from 202 in 2013 to 252 in 2017. Uttar Pradesh reported maximum numbers of cases (693) and maximum number of deaths (93) in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of cases and deaths due to encephalitis were 12,485 and 626, respectively in 2017. Assam accounted for maximum number of cases (5,525) and Uttar Pradesh accounted for maximum number of deaths (246) due to chicken pox in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of cases and deaths due to viral meningitis were 7,559 and 121, respectively in 2017. Andhra Pradesh accounted for maximum number of cases (1,493) and maximum number of deaths (33) due to viral meningitis in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of cases of dengue has almost doubled from 75,808 in 2013 to 1,57,996 in 2017. The total number of deaths due to dengue has increased from 193 in 2013 to 253 in 2017. Tamil Nadu reported maximum numbers of cases (23,294) and maximum number of deaths (65) in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; As per the National Programme for Prevention and Control of Cancer, Diabetes, Cardiovascular Diseases and Stroke (NPCDCS), out of 3,57,23,660 patients who attended non-communicable disease (NCD) clinics in 2017, 8.41 percent people are diagnosed with diabetes, 10.22 percent are diagnosed with hypertension (high blood pressure), 0.37% are diagnosed with cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), 0.13 percent are diagnosed with stroke and 0.11 percent are diagnosed with common cancers (including oral, cervical and breast cancer).<br /> <br /> &bull; During the year 2015, the lives of 4,13,457 and 1,33,623 people are cut short as a result of accidental and suicide cases, respectively. Many more people suffer non-fatal injuries, with many incurring a disability as a result of their injury.<br /> <br /> &bull; Suicide rates are increasing significantly for young adults including male, female &amp; transgender in a wider population. The maximum number of suicide cases (44,593) is reported between the age-group 30-45 years.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of disabled persons in India is 26,814,994 as per the Census 2011.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of cases and deaths due to snake bite were 1,42,366 and 948 respectively in 2017.<br /> <br /> <strong>Health Financing in India</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; The total public expenditure on health for the year 2015-16 stood at Rs 1.4 lakh crores (actual).<br /> <br /> &bull; The per capita public expenditure (actual) on health in nominal terms has gone up from Rs. 621 in 2009-10 to Rs. 1,112 in 2015-16.<br /> <br /> &bull; Public expenditure on health (includes health sector expenditure by Centre and States/UTs) as a percentage of GDP was 1.02 percent in 2015-16. There is no significant change in public expenditure on health as a percentage of GDP since 2009-10.<br /> <br /> &bull; The Centre-State share in total public expenditure on health was 31:69 in 2015-16, which used to be 36:64 in 2009-10.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total public expenditure on health (excluding other Central Ministries) in 2015-16 was Rs. 1,40,054 crores, with Medical and Public Health comprising the major share (78.7 percent). The share of Family Welfare was 12.6 percent.<br /> <br /> &bull; Urban and rural health services constituted 71 percent of the public expenditure on medical and public health in 2015-16.<br /> <br /> &bull; The North-Eastern states had the highest (viz. Rs. 2,878 per capita) and Empowered Action Group (EAG) states (including Assam) had the lowest (viz. Rs. 871 per capita) average per capita public expenditure on health in 2015-16 (excluding UTs). For example, in Mizoram the per capita health expenditure was Rs. 5862 (actual) in 2015-16. However, in Bihar, the per capita health expenditure was Rs. 491 (actual) in 2015-16.<br /> <br /> &bull; The North-Eastern states had the highest public health expenditure as a percentage of Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP) in 2015-16 (2.76 percent). Public health expenditure as a percentage of GSDP stood at 1.36 percent for EAG states (including Assam) and 0.76 percent for major non-EAG states.<br /> <br /> &bull; Based on the Health Survey (71st round) conducted by National Sample Service Office (NSSO), the average medical expenditure incurred during stay at hospital between January, 2013 and June, 2014 was Rs. 14,935 for rural and Rs. 24,436 for urban India.<br /> <br /> &bull; The average total medical expenditure per child birth as in-patient over the last 365 days (survey conducted from January to June 2014) in a public hospital in rural areas was Rs. 1,587 and in urban areas is Rs. 2,117.<br /> <br /> &bull; Around 43 crore individuals were covered under any health insurance in the year 2016-17. This amounts to 34 percent of the total population of India. Almost 79 percent of them were covered by public insurance companies.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; Overall, 77 percent of all persons covered with insurance fall under Government-sponsored schemes.<br /> <br /> &bull; Public insurance companies had a higher share of coverage and premium for all types of health insurance policies, except family floater policies including individual policies.<br /> <br /> &bull; Compared to countries that have either Universal Health Coverage or moving towards it, India&rsquo;s per capita public spending on health is low.<br /> <br /> <strong>Human Resources in Health Sector</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; The number of registered allopathic doctors possessing recognized medical qualifications (under Indian Medical Council Act) and registered with state medical council for the years 2016 and 2017 were 25,282 and 17,982, respectively. Upto 2017, the total number of doctors possessing recognised medical qualifications (under the IMC Act) registered with the State Medical Councils/ Medical Council of India is 10,41,395.&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; In 2017, the average population served per government allopathic doctor was 11,082. The state having the highest average population served per government allopathic doctor in 2017 was Bihar (28,391), followed by Uttar Pradesh (19,962) and Jharkhand (18,518).&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; In 2017, the average population served per government dental surgeon was 1,76,004. The state having the highest average population served per government dental surgeon in 2017 was Chhattisgarh (25,87,900), followed by Maharashtra (14,83,150) and Uttar Pradesh (11,41,869).<br /> <br /> &bull; The number of dental surgeon registered with Central/ State Dental Councils of India has increased from 93,332 in 2008 to 2,51,207 as on 31st December, 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; Over the years with gaining popularity, there is a steady rise in total number of registered AYUSH doctors in India from 7,71,468 in 2016 to 7,73,668 in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; There was a total of 8,41,279 Auxilliary Nurse Midwives (ANMs) serving in the country as on 31st December, 2016.<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 31st December, 2016, the highest number of registered ANMs among the states were found in Andhra Pradesh (1,38,435), followed by Rajasthan (1,08,688) and Odisha (62,159).<br /> <br /> &bull; There are 19,80,536 Registered Nurses and Registered Midwives (RN &amp; RM) and 56,367 Lady Health Visitors (LHV) serving in the country as on 31st December, 2016.<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 31st December, 2016, the highest number of registered RN &amp; RM among the states were found in Tamil Nadu (2,62,718), followed by Kerala (2,46,161) and Andhra Pradesh (2,32,621).<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 13th November, 2017, the total number of registered pharmacists operating in the country is 9,07,132.<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 13th November, 2017, the highest number of registered pharmacists among the states were found in Maharashtra (2,03,089), followed by Gujarat (1,19,445) and Andhra Pradesh (1,15,754).<br /> <br /> &bull; In rural areas, the total number of allopathic doctors at primary health centres (PHCs) was 27,124 as on 31st March, 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 31st March, 2017, among the states, the highest number of allopathic doctors at PHCs was found in Maharashtra (2,929), followed by Tamil Nadu (2,759) and Rajasthan (2,382).<br /> <br /> &bull; In rural areas, the total number of specialists at community health centres (CHCs) is 4,156 as on 31st March, 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 31st March, 2017, among the states, the highest number of specialists at CHCs is found in Maharashtra (508), followed by Karnataka (498) and Rajasthan (497).<br /> <br /> <strong>Health Infrastructure</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; Medical education infrastructures in the country have shown rapid growth during the last 26 years. The country has 476 medical colleges, 313 dental colleges for Bachelor of Dental Surgery (BDS) &amp; 249 dental colleges for Master of Dental Surgery (MDS). There has been a total admission of 52,646 in 476 Medical Colleges and 27,060 in BDS and 6,233 in MDS during 2017-18.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of dental colleges for BDS has increased from 77 in 1994-95 to 313 in 2017-18 viz. by 4.1 times. The total number of dental colleges for MDS has increased from 32 in 1994-95 to 249 in 2017-18 viz. by 7.8 times.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of admission in dental colleges for BDS has risen from 1,987 in 1994-95 to 27,060 in 2017-18 viz. by 13.6 times. The total number of admission in dental colleges for MDS has risen from 225 in 1994-95 to 6,233 in 2017-18 viz. 27.7 times.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of medical colleges in India has increased from 146 in 1991-92 to 476 in 2017-18 viz. by 3.3 times.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of male students taking admissions in medical colleges has gone up from 7,468 in 1991-92 to 26,082 in 2017-18 viz. by 3.5 times. The total number of female students taking admissions in medical colleges has gone up from 4,731 in 1991-92 to 26,564 in 2017-18 viz. by 5.6 times.<br /> <br /> &bull; India has 3,215 institutions producing 1,29,926 General Nurse Midwives annually and 777 colleges for Pharmacy (Diploma) with an intake capacity of 46,795 as on 31st October, 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; There are 23,582 government hospitals having 7,10,761 beds in the country. It means that there is just one bed for 1,826 Indians in government hospitals, assuming that the projected population in 2018 being 129,80,41,000 as on 1st March, 2018.<br /> <br /> &bull; Around 19,810 government hospitals are in rural areas with 2,79,588 beds and 3,772 government hospitals are in urban areas with 4,31,173 beds.<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 31st March, 2017, there were 1,56,231 sub-centres, 25,650 primary health centres (PHCs) and 5,624 community health centres (CHCs).<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 31st March, 2017, most sub-centres were found in Uttar Pradesh (20,521), followed by Rajasthan (14,406) and Maharashtra (10,580).&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 31st March, 2017, most PHCs were found in Uttar Pradesh (3,621), followed by Karnataka (2,359) and Rajasthan (2,079).&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 31st March, 2017, most CHCs were found in Uttar Pradesh (822), followed by Rajasthan (579) and Tamil Nadu (385).<br /> <br /> &bull; Medical care facilities under AYUSH by management status i.e. dispensaries &amp; hospitals were 27,698 and 3,943 respectively, as on 1st April, 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of licensed blood banks in the country till June, 2017 was 2,903. The highest number of blood banks are found in Maharashtra (328), followed by Uttar Pradesh (294) and Tamil Nadu (291).&nbsp;&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; In total, there were 469 eye banks (362 privately run and 107 government run) in the country as on 4th January, 2018. Most eye banks were found in Maharashtra (166), followed by Karnataka (39) and Madhya Pradesh (36).<br /> <br /> <strong>Achievement of health-related SDGs targets</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; On most targets pertaining to health-related Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), India lags behind the target. For example, although the target for coverage of essential health services is 100 percent (indicator no. 3.8.1), in our country only 57 percent of the population is covered by such services. Similarly, although the target for Maternal Mortality Ratio (per 1,00,000 live births) is 70 by 2030 (indicator no. 3.1.1), MMRatio in India presently is 174.<br /> <br /> &bull; The target for Under-five mortality rate (per 1000 live births) is 25 by 2030 (indicator no. 3.2.1). However, U5MR in the country is 47.7.<br /> <br /> &bull; In case of many SDG-related indicators such as Suicide mortality rate (per 100,000 population) (indicator no. 3.4.2) or say Adolescent birth rate (per 1000 women aged 15-19 years) (indicator no. 3.7.2), the SDG target is yet to be determined.<br /> <br /> &bull; For many SDG-related indicators such as Hepatitis B incidence (indicator no. 3.3.4) or say Proportion of the population with access to affordable medicines and vaccines on a sustainable basis (indicator no. 3.b.1), the data for India is either not provided or remain unavailable.<br /> <br /> <strong>Table: Current Status of Health-related Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Target - Indian Scenario</strong><br /> <br /> <img alt="SDGs" src="tinymce/uploaded/SDGs_1.jpg" style="height:242px; width:334px" /><br /> <br /> <em><strong>Source:</strong> Monitoring Health in the Sustainable Development Goals: 2017, World Health Organization, Regional Office for South East Asia, as quoted in the National Health Profile 2018, please <a href="https://bit.ly/2MmfuuK">click here</a> to access, page no. 288<br /> <br /> Report of the Inter-Agency and Expert Group on Sustainable Development Goal Indicators (E/CN.3/2016/2/Rev.1), please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Final%20list%20of%20SDG%20indicators.pdf">click here</a> to access </em><br /> <br /> <br /> &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">While state-level trends for some important health indicators have been available in India, a comprehensive assessment of the diseases causing the most premature deaths and disability in each state, the risk factors responsible for this burden, and their time trends have not been available in a single standardised framework. The India State-level Disease Burden Initiative was launched in October 2015 to address this crucial knowledge gap with support from the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare of the Government of India. This is a collaborative effort between the Indian Council of Medical Research, Public Health Foundation of India, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, and experts and stakeholders from about 100 institutions across India. The work of this Initiative is overseen by an Advisory Board consisting of eminent policymakers and involves extensive engagement of 14 domain expert groups with the estimation process. Based on intense work over two years, this report describes the distribution and trends of diseases and risk factors for every state of India from 1990 to 2016.<br /> <br /> The estimates were produced as part of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. The analytical methods of this study have been standardised over two decades of scientific work, which has been reported in over 16,000 peer-reviewed publications, making it the most widely used approach globally for disease burden estimation. These methods enable standardised comparisons of health loss caused by different diseases and risk factors, between geographic units, sexes, and age groups, and over time in a unified framework. The key metric used for this comparison is disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), which is the sum of the number of years of life lost due to premature death and a weighted measure of the years lived with disability due to a disease or injury. The use of DALYs to track disease burden is recommended by India&rsquo;s National Health Policy of 2017.<br /> <br /> It is to be noted that attributable burden is the share of the burden of a disease that can be estimated to occur due to exposure to a particular risk factor.<br /> <br /> According to the report entitled [inside]India: Health of the Nation&rsquo;s States - The India State-Level Disease Burden Initiative, Disease Burden Trends in the States of India 1990 to 2016 (released in October, 2017) [/inside], prepared by Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), Public Health Foundation of India (PHFI), Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) and Ministry of Health &amp; Family Welfare (MoHFW), please <a href="https://im4change.org/docs/11592India_Health_of.pdf">click here</a> to access:<br /> <br /> <em>Health status improving, but major inequalities between states</em><br /> <br /> &bull; Life expectancy at birth improved in India from 59.7 years in 1990 to 70.3 years in 2016 for females, and from 58.3 years to 66.9 years for males. There were, however, continuing inequalities between states, with a range of 66.8 years in Uttar Pradesh to 78.7 years in Kerala for females, and from 63.6 years in Assam to 73.8 years in Kerala for males in 2016.<br /> <br /> &bull; The per person disease burden measured as DALYs rate dropped by 36 percent from 1990 to 2016 in India, after adjusting for the changes in the population age structure during this period. But there was an almost two-fold difference in this disease burden rate between the states in 2016, with Assam, Uttar Pradesh, and Chhattisgarh having the highest rates, and Kerala and Goa the lowest rates.<br /> <br /> &bull; While the disease burden rate in India has improved since 1990, it was 72 percent higher per person than in Sri Lanka or China in 2016.<br /> <br /> &bull; The under-5 mortality rate has reduced substantially from 1990 in all states, but there was a four-fold difference in this rate between the highest in Assam and Uttar Pradesh as compared with the lowest in Kerala in 2016, highlighting the vast health inequalities between the states.<br /> <br /> <em>Large differences between states in the changing disease profile</em><br /> <br /> &bull; Of the total disease burden in India measured as DALYs, 61 percent was due to communicable, maternal, neonatal, and nutritional diseases (termed infectious and associated diseases in this summary for simplicity) in 1990, which dropped to 33 percent in 2016.<br /> <br /> &bull; There was a corresponding increase in the contribution of non-communicable diseases from 30 percent of the total disease burden in 1990 to 55 percent in 2016, and of injuries from 9 percent to 12 percent.<br /> <br /> &bull; Infectious and associated diseases made up the majority of disease burden in most of the states in 1990, but this was less than half in all states in 2016. However, the year when infectious and associated diseases transitioned to less than half of the total disease burden ranged from 1986 to 2010 for the various state groups in different stages of this transition.<br /> <br /> &bull; The wide variations between the states in this epidemiological transition are reflected in the range of the contribution of major disease groups to the total disease burden in 2016: 48 percent to 75 percent for non-communicable diseases, 14 percent to 43 percent for infectious and associated diseases, and 9 percent to 14 percent for injuries. Kerala, Goa, and Tamil Nadu have the largest dominance of non-communicable diseases and injuries over infectious and associated diseases, whereas this dominance is present but relatively the lowest in Bihar, Jharkhand, Uttar Pradesh, and Rajasthan.<br /> <br /> &bull; It is to be noted that epidemiological transition level (ETL) is based on the ratio of the number of DALYs in a population due to communicable, maternal, neonatal, and nutritional diseases to the number of DALYs due to non-communicable diseases and injuries together. A decreasing ratio indicates advancing epidemiological transition with an increasing relative burden from non-communicable diseases as compared with communicable, maternal, neonatal, and nutritional diseases.<br /> <br /> &bull; The major EAG states of Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh both have a relatively lower level of development indicators and are at a similar less advanced epidemiological transition stage. However, Uttar Pradesh had 50 percent higher disease burden per person from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 54 percent higher burden from tuberculosis, and 30 percent higher burden from diarrhoeal diseases, whereas Madhya Pradesh had 76% higher disease burden per person from stroke. The cardiovascular risks were generally higher in Madhya Pradesh, and the unsafe water and sanitation risk was relatively higher in Uttar Pradesh.<br /> <br /> &bull; The two North-East India states of Manipur and Tripura are both at a lower-middle stage of epidemiological transition but have quite different disease burden rates from specific leading diseases. Tripura had 49% higher per person burden from ischaemic heart disease, 52 percent higher from stroke, 64 percent higher from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 159 percent higher from iron-deficiency anaemia, 59 percent higher from lower respiratory infections, and 56 percent higher from neonatal disorders. Manipur, on the other hand, had 88 percent higher per person burden from tuberculosis and 38 percent higher from road injuries. Regarding the level of risks, child and maternal malnutrition, air pollution, and several of the cardiovascular risks were higher in Tripura.<br /> <br /> &bull; The two adjoining north Indian states of Himachal Pradesh and Punjab both have a relatively higher level of development indicators and are at a similar more advanced epidemiological transition stage. However, there were striking differences between them in the level of burden from specific leading diseases. Punjab had 157 percent higher per person burden from diabetes, 134 percent higher burden from ischaemic heart disease, 49 percent higher burden from stroke, and 56 percent higher burden from road injuries. On the other hand, Himachal Pradesh had 63 percent higher per person burden from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Consistent with these findings, Punjab had substantially higher levels of cardiovascular risks than Himachal Pradesh.<br /> <br /> <em>Rising burden of non-communicable diseases in all states</em><br /> <br /> &bull; The contribution of most of the major non-communicable disease groups to the total disease burden has increased all over India since 1990, including cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, chronic respiratory diseases, mental health and neurological disorders, cancers, musculoskeletal disorders, and chronic kidney disease.<br /> <br /> &bull; Among the leading non-communicable diseases, the largest disease burden or DALY rate increase from 1990 to 2016 was observed for diabetes, at 80 percent, and ischaemic heart disease, at 34 percent. In 2016, three of the five leading individual causes of disease burden in India were non-communicable, with ischaemic heart disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as the top two causes and stroke as the fifth leading cause.<br /> <br /> &bull; The range of disease burden or DALY rate among the states in 2016 was 9 fold for ischaemic heart disease, 4 fold for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and 6 fold for stroke, and 4 fold for diabetes across India. While ischaemic heart disease and diabetes generally had higher DALY rates in states that are at a more advanced epidemiological transition stage toward non-communicable diseases, the DALY rates of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were generally higher in the EAG states that are at a relatively less advanced epidemiological transition stage.<br /> <br /> &bull; The DALY rates of stroke varied across the states without any consistent pattern in relation to the stage of epidemiological transition. This variety of trends of the different major non-communicable diseases indicates that policy and health system interventions to tackle their increasing burden have to be informed by the specific trends in each state.<br /> <br /> <em>Infectious and associated diseases reducing, but still high in many states</em><br /> <br /> &bull; The burden of most infectious and associated diseases reduced in India from 1990 to 2016, but five of the ten individual leading causes of disease burden in India in 2016 still belonged to this group: diarrhoeal diseases, lower respiratory infections, iron-deficiency anaemia, preterm birth complications, and tuberculosis.<br /> <br /> &bull; The burden caused by these conditions generally continues to be much higher in the Empowered Action Group (EAG) and North-East state groups than in the other states, but there were notable variations between the states within these groups as well.<br /> <br /> &bull; One should noted that the Empowered Action Group (EAG) states is a group of eight states that receive special development effort attention from the Government of India, namely, Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Odisha, Rajasthan, Uttarakhand, and Uttar Pradesh.<br /> <br /> &bull; For India as whole, the disease burden or DALY rate for diarrhoeal diseases, iron-deficiency anaemia, and tuberculosis was 2.5 to 3.5 times higher than the average globally for other geographies at a similar level of development, indicating that this burden can be brought down substantially.<br /> <br /> <em>Increasing but variable burden of injuries among states</em><br /> <br /> &bull; The contribution of injuries to the total disease burden has increased in most states since 1990. The highest proportion of disease burden due to injuries is in young adults. Road injuries and self-harm, which includes suicides and non-fatal outcomes of self-harm, are the leading contributors to the injury burden in India.<br /> <br /> &bull; The range of disease burden or DALY rate varied 3 fold for road injuries and 6 fold for self-harm among the states of India in 2016.<br /> <br /> &bull; The burden due to road injuries was much higher in males than in females. The DALY rate for self-harm for India as a whole was 1.8 times higher than the average globally for other geographies at a similar level of development in 2016.<br /> <br /> <em>Rising risks for cardiovascular diseases and diabetes</em><br /> <br /> &bull; Of the total disease burden in India in 1990, a tenth was caused by a group of risks including unhealthy diet, high blood pressure, high blood sugar, high cholesterol, and overweight, which mainly contribute to ischaemic heart disease, stroke, and diabetes. The contribution of this group of risks increased massively to a quarter of the total disease burden in India in 2016.<br /> <br /> &bull; The combination of these risks was highest in Punjab, Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Andhra Pradesh, and Maharashtra in 2016, but importantly, the contribution of these risks has increased in every state of the country since 1990.<br /> <br /> &bull; The other significant contributor to cardiovascular diseases and diabetes, as well as to cancers and some other diseases, is tobacco use, which was responsible for 6% of the total disease burden in India in 2016. All of these risks are generally higher in males than in females.<br /> <br /> <em>Unacceptably high risk of child and maternal malnutrition</em><br /> <br /> &bull; While the disease burden due to child and maternal malnutrition has dropped in India substantially since 1990, this is still the single largest risk factor, responsible for 15% of the total disease burden in India in 2016. This burden is highest in the major EAG states and Assam, and is higher in females than in males.<br /> <br /> &bull; Child and maternal malnutrition contributes to disease burden mainly through increasing the risk of neonatal disorders, nutritional deficiencies, diarrhoeal diseases, lower respiratory infections, and other common infections.<br /> <br /> &bull; As a stark contrast, the disease burden due to child and maternal malnutrition in India was 12 times higher per person than in China in 2016. Kerala had the lowest burden due to this risk among the Indian states, but even this was 2.7 times higher per person than in China.<br /> <br /> <em>Unsafe water and sanitation improving, but not enough yet</em><br /> <br /> &bull; Unsafe water and sanitation was the second leading risk responsible for disease burden in India in 1990, but dropped to the seventh leading risk in 2016, contributing 5 percent of the total disease burden, mainly through diarrhoeal diseases and other infections.<br /> <br /> &bull; Risk factors means potentially modifiable causes of disease and injury.<br /> <br /> &bull; The burden due to this risk is also highest in several EAG states and Assam, and higher in females than in males. The improvement in exposure to this risk from 1990 to 2016 was least in the EAG states, indicating that higher focus is needed in these states for more rapid improvements.<br /> <br /> &bull; The per person disease burden due to unsafe water and sanitation was 40 times higher in India than in China in 2016.<br /> <br /> <em>Household air pollution improving, outdoor air pollution worsening</em><br /> <br /> &bull; The contribution of air pollution to disease burden remained high in India between 1990 and 2016, with levels of exposure among the highest in the world. It causes burden through a mix of non-communicable and infectious diseases, mainly cardiovascular diseases, chronic respiratory diseases, and lower respiratory infections.<br /> <br /> &bull; The burden of household air pollution decreased during the period 1990-2016 due to decreasing use of solid fuels for cooking, and that of outdoor air pollution increased due to a variety of pollutants from power production, industry, vehicles, construction, and waste burning.<br /> <br /> &bull; Household air pollution was responsible for 5 percent of the total disease burden in India in 2016, and outdoor air pollution for 6 percent. The burden due to household air pollution is highest in the EAG states, where its improvement since 1990 has also been the slowest. On the other hand, the burden due to outdoor air pollution is highest in a mix of northern states, including Haryana, Uttar Pradesh, Punjab, Rajasthan, Bihar, and West Bengal.<br /> &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> The report entitled National Health Accounts: Estimates for India 2014-15 (released in October, 2017) provides healthcare expenditures in India based on National Health Accounts Guidelines for India, 2016 (with refinements where required) that adhere to System of Health Accounts 2011 (SHA 2011), a global standard framework for producing health accounts. The NHA estimates for India is a result of an institutionalised process wherein, the boundaries, data sources, classification codes and estimation methodology have all been standardised in consultation with national and international experts under the guidance of NHA Expert Group for India.<br /> <br /> The NHA provides key indicators to understand financing of health system in the country and allows for comparison with other countries. The National Health Policy 2017 sets out several goals related to healthcare financing and emphasizes the need to track expenditures on health through a robust system of National Health Accounts. The production of annual NHA estimates builds a database for tracking trends in allocations for health by union/state governments and estimate the burden of out-of-pocket payments.<br /> <br /> The key findings of the report entitled [inside]National Health Accounts: Estimates for India 2014-15 (released in October, 2017)[/inside], which has been prepared by the National Health Accounts Technical Secretariat, National Health Systems Resource Centre and Ministry of Health and Family Welfare&nbsp; are as follows (please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/National%20Health%20Accounts%20Estimates%20Report%202014-15.pdf" title="National Health Accounts Estimates for India 2014-15">click here</a> to access):<br /> <br /> &bull; The Total Health Expenditure (THE) for India is estimated at Rs. 4,83,259 crores (3.89 percent of GDP and Rs. 3,826 per capita) for the year 2014-15. THE constitutes current and capital expenditures incurred by Government and Private Sources including External/Donor funds. Current Health Expenditure (CHE) is Rs. 4,51,286 crores (93.4 percent of THE) and capital expenditures is Rs. 31,973 crores (6.6 percent of THE).<br /> <br /> &bull; The Government Health Expenditure (GHE) including capital expenditure is Rs. 1,39,949 crores (29 percent of THE, 1.13 percent GDP and Rs. 1,108 per capita) for the year 2014-15. This amounts to about 3.94 percent of General Government Expenditure in 2014-15. Of the GHE, Union Government share is 37 percent and State Government share is 63 percent. Union Government Expenditure on National Health Mission is Rs. 20,199 crores, Defence Medical Services Rs. 6,695 crores, Railway Health Services is Rs. 2,111 crores, Central Government Health Scheme (CGHS) is Rs. 2,300 crores and Ex Servicemen Contributory Health Scheme (ECHS) is Rs. 2,243 crores.<br /> <br /> &bull; The Out-of-Pocket Expenditure (OOPE) on health by households is Rs. 3,02,425 crores (62.6 percent of THE, 2.4 percent of GDP, Rs. 2,394 per capita) for the year 2014-15. Private Health Insurance expenditure is Rs. 17,755 crores (3.7 percent of THE) for the year 2014-15.<br /> <br /> &bull; Of the Current Health Expenditure, Union Government share is Rs. 37,221 crores (8.2 percent) and the State Government&rsquo;s share Rs. 59,978 crores (13.3 percent). Local bodies&rsquo; share is Rs. 2,960 crores (0.7 percent), Households share (including insurance contributions) about Rs. 3,20,262 crores (71 percent, OOPE being 67 percent). Contribution by enterprises (including insurance contributions) is Rs. 20,069 crores (4.4 percent) and NGOs is Rs. 7,422 crores (1.6 percent). External/donor funding contributes to about Rs. 3,374 crores (0.7 percent).<br /> <br /> &bull; The Current Health Expenditure attributed to Government Hospitals is Rs. 64,685 crores (14.3 percent) and Private Hospitals Rs. 1, 16,943 (25.9 percent). Expenditures incurred on other Government Providers (including PHC, Dispensaries and Family Planning Centres) is Rs. 27,782 crores (6.2 percent), Other Private Providers (incl. private clinics) is Rs. 23,795 crores (5.3 percent), Providers of Patient Transport and Emergency Rescue is Rs. 20,627 crores (4.6 percent), Medical and Diagnostic laboratories is Rs. 21,058 crores (4.7 percent), Pharmacies is Rs. 1,30,451 crores (28.9 percent), Other Retailers is Rs. 559 crores (0.1 percent), Providers of Preventive care is Rs. 23,817 crores (5.3 percent), and Other Providers is Rs. 9,985 crores (2.2 percent). About Rs. 11,584 crores (2.6 percent) is attributed to Providers of Health System Administration and Financing.<br /> <br /> &bull; Current health expenditure attributed to Inpatient Curative Care is Rs. 1,58,334 crores (35.1 percent), Outpatient curative care is Rs. 73,059 crores (16.2 percent), Patient Transportation is Rs. 20,627 crores (4.6 percent), Laboratory and Imaging services is Rs. 21,058 crores (4.7 percent), Prescribed Medicines is Rs. 1,28,887 crores (28.6 percent), Over The Counter (OTC) Medicines is Rs. 1564 crores (0.3 percent), Therapeutic Appliances and Medical Goods is Rs. 559 crores (0.1 percent), Preventive Care is Rs. 30,420 crores (6.7 percent), and others is Rs. 5,194 crores (1.2 percent). About Rs. 11,584 crores (2.6 percent) is attributed to Governance and Health System Administration.<br /> <br /> &bull; Total Pharmaceutical Expenditure is 37.9 percent of CHE (includes prescribed medicines, over the counter drugs and those provided during an inpatient, outpatient or any other event involving a contact with health care provider). The Expenditure on Traditional, Complementary and Alternative Medicine (TCAM) is 16 percent of CHE.<br /> <br /> &bull; The Current Health Expenditure attributed to Primary Care is 45.1 percent, Secondary Care is 35.6 percent, Tertiary care is 15.6 percent and governance and supervision is 2.6 percent. When this is disaggregated; Government expenditure on Primary Care is 51.3 percent, Secondary Care is 21.9 percent and Tertiary Care is 14 percent. Private expenditure on Primary Care is 43.1 percent, Secondary Care is 39.9 percent and Tertiary Care is 16.1 percent.<br /> &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/National%20Health%20Policy%202017.pdf">click here</a> to access the [inside]National Health Policy 2017[/inside].</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> The National Health Profile provides the latest data on all major health sector-related indicators in a comprehensive manner. It gives information on 6 major sectors i.e. Demographic, Socio-economic, Health Status, Health Finance, Health Infrastructure and Human Resources.&nbsp;<br /> <br /> According to the [inside]National Health Profile 2015[/inside], produced by the Central Bureau of Health Intelligence, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, (please <a href="http://www.cbhidghs.nic.in/E-Book%20HTML-2015/index.html">click here</a> to access):<br /> <br /> <strong><em>Demographic indicators</em></strong><br /> <br /> &bull; Infant Mortality Rate has declined considerably (40 per 1000 live births in 2013), however differentials of rural (44) and urban (27) are still high.<br /> <br /> &bull; Maternal Mortality Ratio (per 1 lakh live births) is highest in Assam (300) and lowest in Kerala (61) in 2011-13.<br /> <br /> &bull; The life expectancy at birth has increased from 49.7 years in 1970-75 to 66.1 years in 2006-10. During 2006-10, the life expectancy for females has been 67.7 years and males has been 64.6 years.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; Among the states, sex ratio is least for Haryana (879) while among the UTs, Daman and Diu (618) lags behind. Kerala (1084) tops the list with maximum sex ratio.<br /> <br /> &bull; The Total Fertility Rate (TFR) for the country has been 2.3 in 2013. In rural areas it has been 2.5, and in urban areas it has been 1.8.<br /> <br /> <strong><em>Socio-economic indicators</em></strong><br /> <br /> &bull; Literacy rate stood at 73 percent in 2011. Literacy rate among females has been 64.6 percent and males has been 80.9 percent. Literacy rate in urban areas (84.1 percent) has been more as compared to the same in rural areas (67.8 percent). Literacy rate has been highest in Kerala (94 percent)<br /> <br /> &bull; The percentage of population below the poverty line (as per Tendulkar methodology) has been 21.9 percent in 2011-12. The percentage of population below the poverty line in rural areas has been 25.7 percent and in urban areas has been 13.7 percent.<br /> <br /> &bull; The per capita Net National Income at current prices increased almost 3 times from Rs. 24,143 in 2004-05 to Rs. 74,920 in 2013-14.<br /> <br /> &bull; The per capita per day net availability of cereals has increased from 386.2 gm in 2001 to 468.9 gm in 2013. Similarly, the per capita per day net availability of pulses has increased from 30 gm in 2001 to 41.9 gm in 2013.<br /> <br /> &bull; Slum population in India is projected to increase from 9.30 crore in 2011 to 10.47 crore in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; Of the total 1.34 crore residences in slums, nearly 58.5 percent are in good condition, 37.4 percent are in livable condition and 4.1 percent are in dilapidated condition.&nbsp;<br /> <br /> <strong><em>Health status </em></strong><br /> <br /> &bull; Based on available evidence, cardiovascular disease (24 percent), chronic respiratory disease (11 percent), cancer (6 percent) and diabetes (2 percent) are the leading cause of mortality in India.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of dengue cases in India has grown from 28,292 in 2010 to 40,425 in 2014. The total number of dengue related deaths stood at 131 in 2014.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of Japanese Encephalitis cases in India has grown from 555 in 2010 to 1,652 in 2014. The total number of Japanese Encephalitis related deaths stood at 292 in 2014.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of malaria cases in India has grown from nearly 16 lakh in 2010 to 10.71 lakh in 2014. The total number of malaria related deaths stood at 535 in 2014.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of Chikungunya fever cases in India has reduced from 48,176 in 2010 to 15,445 in 2014.&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; Nearly 47 percent of deliveries in India during 2012-13 were institutional whereas 52.3 percent deliveries took place at home.&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; Nearly 40.5 percent of children under 3 years of age were breastfed within an hour of birth in 2012-13.&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; At the national level, nearly 54 percent of children aged 12-23 months received full vaccination during 2012-13.<br /> <br /> &bull; The incidence of infanticide was 82 and foeticide was 210 in 2012.<br /> <br /> <strong><em>Health finance</em></strong><br /> <br /> &bull; Per capita public expenditure on health in nominal terms has gone up from Rs. 621 in 2009-10 to Rs. 1280 in 2014-15.<br /> <br /> &bull; Public expenditure on health as a percentage of GDP has gone up from 1.12 percent in 2009-10 to 1.26 percent in 2014-15.<br /> <br /> &bull; The Centre-state share in total public expenditure on health has changed from 36:64 in 2009-10 to 30:70 in 2014-15.<br /> <br /> &bull; Out-of-pocket (OOP) medical expenditure incurred during 2011-12 has been Rs. 146 per capita per month for urban India and Rs. 95 for rural India.<br /> <br /> &bull; Over 60 percent of total OOP health expenditure is on medicines, both in rural and urban India in 2011-12.<br /> <br /> &bull; As a share of total consumption expenditure, OOP expenditure on health has been 6.7 percent in rural India and 5.5 percent in urban India in 2011-12.<br /> <br /> &bull; Per capita OOP expenditure as well as the share of OOP in total consumption expenditure was positively correlated with consumption expenditure fractiles; higher fractiles had higher levels of both per capita OOP and share of OOP in consumption expenditure in 2011-12.<br /> <br /> &bull; Among all the states, Kerala had the highest per capita OOP medical expenditure as well as its share in total consumption expenditure in 2011-12.<br /> <br /> &bull; Around 22 crore individuals were covered under any health insurance in 2013-14. This means 18 percent of the population has been covered under any health insurance.<br /> <br /> <strong><em>Human resources in health sector</em></strong><br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of doctors possessing recognized medical qualification (under the IMC Act), registered with state medical councils or Medical Council of India, stood at 15,976 in 2014.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of dental surgeons registered with the Central/ State Dental Councils of India stood at 1.54 lakhs in 2014, which was 21,720 in 1994.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of Government allopathic doctors stood at 1.06 lakhs and the total number of Government dental surgeons stood at 5,614.<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 31 December, 2014, the total number of Auxiliary Nurse Midwives (ANMs) stood at 7.86 lakh, whereas Registered Nurses &amp; Registered Midwives (RN &amp; RM) stood at 17.8 lakhs and Lady Health Visitors (LHV) stood at 55,914.<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 27 June, 2014, the total number of pharmacists stood at 6.64 lakh.<br /> <br /> <strong><em>Health infrastructure</em></strong><br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of licensed blood banks in India as on February 2015 is 2760.<br /> <br /> &bull; There are 20,306 hospitals having 6.76 lakh beds in India. There are 16,816 hospitals in rural areas having 1.84 lakh beds and 3,490 hospitals in urban areas having 4.92 lakh beds.<br /> <br /> &bull; The number of medical colleges in India has more than doubled from 146 in 1991-92 to 398 in 2014-15.<br /> &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> The 71st round National Sample Survey on &ldquo;Social Consumption: Health&rdquo; was conducted during January to June 2014. The information in the survey was collected from 36,480 households in rural areas and 29,452 households in urban areas during the 71st round.<br /> <br /> The key findings of the [inside]71st round NSS report: Key Indicators of Social Consumption in India Health (published in June 2015)[/inside] are as follows (please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/nss_71st_ki_health_30june15.pdf" title="NSS 71st Round Health">click here</a> to access the full report; please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/NSS%20Press%20Release%20Health.pdf" title="NSS Press Note Health">click here</a> to read the summary of findings):<br /> <br /> <em>A. Non-hospitalized treatment</em><br /> <br /> &bull; The Proportion (per 1000) of Ailing Persons (PAP), measured as the number of living persons reporting ailments (per 1000 persons), was 89 persons in rural India and 118 persons in urban India.<br /> <br /> &bull; Inclination towards allopathy treatment was prevalent (around 90% in both the sectors). Only 5 to 7 percent usage of &lsquo;other&rsquo; including AYUSH (Ayurveda, Yoga or Naturopathy Unani, Siddha and homoeopathy) was reported both in rural and urban area. Moreover, un-treated spell was higher in rural (both for male and female) than urban areas.<br /> <br /> &bull; Private doctors were the most important single source of treatment in both the sectors (Rural &amp; Urban). More than 70 percent (72 per cent in the rural areas and 79 per cent in the urban areas) spells of ailment were treated in the private sector (consisting of private doctors, nursing homes, private hospitals, charitable institutions, etc.).<br /> <br /> <em>B. Hospitalized treatment</em><br /> <br /> &bull; Medical treatment of an ailing person as an in-patient in any medical institution having provision for treating the sick as in-patients, was considered as hospitalised treatment. In the urban population, 4.4 percent persons were hospitalised at some time during a reference period of 365 days. The proportion of persons hospitalised in the rural areas was lower (3.5 percent).<br /> <br /> &bull; It is observed that in rural India, 42 percent hospitalised treatment was carried out in public hospital and rest 58 percent in private hospital. For the urban India, the corresponding figures were 32 percent and 68 percent. It may be noted in this context that households (or persons within households) were segregated in sector (rural/urban) by their place of domicile, and not by the place of treatment.<br /> <br /> &bull; Preference towards allopathy treatment was observed in cases of hospitalised treatment as well.<br /> <br /> <em>C. Cost of treatment - as in-patient and other</em><br /> <br /> &bull; Average medical expenditure per hospitalisation case: Higher amount was spent for treatment per hospitalised case by people in the private hospitals (Rs. 25850) than in the public hospitals (Rs. 6120). The highest expenditure was recorded for treatment of Cancer (Rs. 56712) followed by that for Cardio-vascular diseases (Rs. 31647).<br /> <br /> &bull; Average medical expenditure per non-hospitalisation case was Rs. 509 in rural India and Rs. 639 in urban India.<br /> <br /> &bull; As much as 86 percent of rural population and 82 percent of urban population were still not covered under any scheme of health expenditure support. Government, however, was able to bring about 12 percent urban and 13 percent rural population under health protection coverage through Rastriya Swasthya Bima Yojana (RSBY) or similar plan. Only 12 percent households of the 5th quintile class (Usual Monthly Per Capita Consumer Expenditure) of urban area had some arrangement of medical insurance from private provider.<br /> <br /> <em>D. Incidence of childbirth, Expenditure on institutional childbirth</em><br /> <br /> &bull; In rural area 9.6% women (age 15-49) were pregnant at any time during the reference period of 365 days; for urban this proportion was 6.8%. Evidence of interrelation of place of childbirth with level of living is noted both in rural and urban areas. In the rural areas, about 20% of the childbirths were at home or any other place other than the hospitals. The same for urban areas was 10.5%. Among the institutional childbirth, 55.5% took place in public hospital and 24% in private hospital in rural area. In urban area, however, the corresponding figures were 42% and 47.5% respectively.<br /> <br /> &bull; An average of Rs. 5544 was spent per childbirth (as inpatient) in rural area and Rs. 11685 in urban area. The rural population spent, on an average, Rs. 1587 for the same in a public sector hospital and Rs. 14778 for one in a private sector hospital. The corresponding figures for urban India were Rs. 2117 and Rs. 20328.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> The key findings of the [inside]Draft National Health Policy 2015 (published in December 2014)[/inside], prepared by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare are as follows (Please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Draft%20National%20Health%20Policy%202015.pdf" title="Draft NHP 2015">click here</a> to download):<br /> <br /> &bull; The draft National Health Policy accepts and endorses the understanding that a full achievement of the goals and principles as defined would require an increased public health expenditure to 4% to 5% of the GDP. However, given that the NHP, 2002 target of 2% was not met, and taking into account the financial capacity of the country to provide this amount and the institutional capacity to utilize the increased funding in an effective manner, the present draft health policy proposes a potentially achievable target of raising public health expenditure to 2.5% of the GDP. It also notes that 40% of this would need to come from Central expenditures. At current prices, a target of 2.5% of GDP translates to Rs. 3800 per capita, representing an almost four fold increase in five years.<br /> <br /> &bull; The private sector today provides nearly 80% of outpatient care and about 60% of inpatient care. (The out-patient estimate would be significantly lower if we included only qualified providers. By NSSO estimates as much as 40% of the private care is likely to be by informal unqualified providers). 72% of all private health care enterprises are own-account-enterprises (OAEs), which are household run businesses providing health services without hiring a worker on a fairly regular basis.<br /> <br /> &bull; In terms of comparative efficiency, public sector is value for money as it accounts (based on the NSSO 60th round) for less than 30% of total expenditure, but provides for about 20% of outpatient care and 40% of in-patient care. This same expenditure also pays for 60% of end-of-life care (RGI estimates on hospital mortality), and almost 100% of preventive and promotive care and a substantial part of medical and nursing education as well.<br /> <br /> &bull; Thailand has almost the same total health expenditure as India but its proportion of public health expenditure is 77.7% of total health expenditures (which is 3.2% of the GDP) and this is spent through a form of strategic purchasing in which about 95% is purchased from public health care facilities- which is what gives it such a high efficiency. Brazil spends 9% of its GDP on health but of this public health expenditure constitutes 4.1% of the GDP (which is 45.7% of total health expenditure). This public health expenditure accounts for almost 75% of all health care provision. It would be ambitious if India could aspire to a public health expenditure of 4% of the GDP, but most expert groups have estimated 2.5% as being more realistic.<br /> <br /> &bull; As costs of care rise, affordability, as distinct from equity, requires emphasis. Health care costs of a household exceeding 10% of its total monthly consumption expenditures or 40% of its non-food consumption expenditure- is designated catastrophic health expenditures- and is declared as an unacceptable level of health care costs.<br /> <br /> &bull; Almost all hospitalization even in public hospitals leads to catastrophic health expenditures, and over 63 million persons are faced with poverty every year due to health care costs alone. It is because there is no financial protection for the vast majority of health care needs. In 2011-12, the share of out-of-pocket expenditure on health care as a proportion of total household monthly per capita expenditure was 6.9% in rural areas and 5.5% in urban areas. This led to an increasing number of households facing catastrophic expenditures due to health costs (18% of all households in 2011-12 as compared to 15% in 2004-05). Under NRHM, free care in public hospitals was extended to a select set of conditions &ndash; for maternity, newborn and infant care as part of the Janani Suraksha Yojana and, the Janani Shishu Suraksha Karyakram, and for disease control programmes. For all other services, user fees especially for diagnostics and &ldquo;outside prescriptions&rdquo; for drugs continued. Also, due to the selective approach, several essential services especially for chronic illness was not obtainable or at best only available at overcrowded district and medical college hospitals resulting in physical and financial hardship and poor quality of care.<br /> <br /> &bull; The Central Government under the Ministry of Labour &amp; Employment, launched the Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana (RSBY) in 2008. The population coverage under these various schemes increased from almost 55 million people in 2003-04 to about 370 million in 2014 (almost one-fourth of the population). Nearly two thirds (180 million) of this population are those in the Below Poverty Line (BPL) category. Evaluations show that schemes such as the RSBY, have improved utilization of hospital services, especially in private sector and among the poorest 20% of households and SC/ST households. However there are other problems. One problem is low awareness among the beneficiaries about the entitlement and how and when to use the RSBY card. Another is related to denial of services by private hospitals for many categories of illnesses, and over supply of some services.<br /> <br /> &bull; The private health care industry is valued at $40 billion and is projected to grow to $ 280 billion by 2020 as per market sources. The current growth rate of this perennially and most rapidly growing area of the economy, the healthcare industry, at 14% is projected to be 21% in the next decade. Even during the global recession of 2008, this sector remained relatively recession-proof. The private health care industry is complex and differentiated. It includes insurance and equipment, which accounts for about 15%, pharmaceuticals which accounts for over 25%, about 10% on diagnostics and about 50% is hospitals and clinical care. The private sector growth cannot be seen merely as a consequence of limited public sector investment. The Government has had an active policy in the last 25 years of building a positive economic climate for the health care industry. Amongst these measures are lower direct taxes; higher depreciation in medical equipment; Income Tax exemptions for 5 years for rural hospitals; custom duty exemptions for imported equipment that are lifesaving; Income Tax exemption for Health Insurance; and active engagement through publicly financed health insurance which now covers almost 27% of the population.<br /> <br /> &bull; Maternal mortality now accounts for 0.55% of all deaths and 4% of all female deaths in the 15 to 49 year age group.<br /> <br /> &bull; India is set to reach the Millennium Development Goals (MDG) with respect to maternal and child survival. The MDG target for Maternal Mortality Ratio (MMR) is 140 per 100,000 live births. From a baseline of 560 in 1990, the nation had achieved 178 by 2010-12, and at this rate of decline is estimated to reach an MMR of 141 by 2015.<br /> <br /> &bull; In the case of under-5 mortality rate (U5MR), the MDG target is 42. From a baseline of 126 in 1990, in 2012 the nation has an U5MR of 52 and an extrapolation of this rate would bring it to 42 by 2015. This is particularly creditable on a global scale where in 1990 India&#39;s MMR and U5MR were 47% and 40% above the international average respectively.<br /> <br /> &bull; Although over 90% of pregnant women receive one antenatal check up and 87% received full TT immunization, only about 68.7% of women have received the mandatory three antenatal check-ups. Again whereas most women had received iron and folic acid tablets, only 31% of pregnant women had consumed more than 100 IFA tablets. For institutional delivery, standard protocols are often not followed during labour and the postpartum period. Sterilization related deaths a preventable tragedy, are often a direct consequence of poor quality of care. Only 61% of children (12-23 months) have been fully immunized.<br /> <br /> &bull; In AIDS control, progress has been good with a decline from a 0.41% prevalence rate in 2001 to 0.27% in 2011 but this still leaves about 21 lakh persons living with HIV, with about 1.16 lakh new cases and 1.48 deaths in 2011. In tuberculosis the challenge is a prevalence of close to 211 cases and 19 deaths per 100,000 population and rising problems of multi-drug resistant tuberculosis. Though these are significant declines from the MDG baseline, India still contributes to 24% of all global new case detection.<br /> <br /> &bull; Over 75% of communicable diseases are not part of existing national programmes. Overall, communicable diseases contribute to 24.4% of the entire disease burden while maternal and neonatal ailments contribute to 13.8%. Non-communicable diseases (39.1%) and injuries (11.8%) now constitute the bulk of the country&#39;s disease burden. National Health Programmes for non-communicable diseases are very limited in coverage and scope, except perhaps in the case of the Blindness control programme.<br /> <br /> &bull; The gap between service availability and needs is widest in the case of mental illness- 43 facilities in the nation with a 0.47 psychologists per million people.<br /> <br /> &bull; The elderly i.e. the population above 60 years comprise 8.6% of the population (103.8 million) and they are also a vulnerable section. Those above 75 years (20.52 million) are most vulnerable and almost 8% of the elderly population is bed ridden or homebound (NSSO).<br /> <br /> **page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The report entitled [inside]Economic Burden of Tobacco Related Diseases in India[/inside] (please&nbsp;<a href="tinymce/uploaded/economic_burden_of_tobacco_related_diseases_in_india_executive_summary.pdf" title="Economic Burden of tobacco related diseases">click here</a>&nbsp;to download the Executive Summary), supported by the Ministry of Health &amp; Family Welfare, Government of India and the WHO Country Office for India, was developed by the Public Health Foundation of India (PHFI).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The report estimates direct and indirect costs from all diseases caused due to tobacco use and four specific diseases namely, respiratory diseases, tuberculosis, cardiovascular diseases and cancers. The report also highlights that tobacco use and the associated costs are creating an enormous burden for the nation.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The total economic costs attributable to tobacco use from all diseases in India in the year 2011 for persons aged 35-69 amounted to Rs. 104500 crores of which 16 percent was direct cost and 84 percent was indirect cost.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to the report, massive direct medical costs of tobacco attributable diseases amount to Rs.16,800 crore and associated indirect morbidity cost of Rs. 14,700 crore. The cost from premature mortality is Rs. 73,000 crores, indicating a substantial productive loss to the nation, the report states.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to the United Nations&#39; report (released in May, 2014) entitled [inside]Trends in maternal mortality estimates 1990 to 2013[/inside], (please&nbsp;<a href="tinymce/uploaded/Trends%20in%20Maternal%20Mortality%201990%20to%202013.pdf" title="Trends in Maternal Mortality 1990 to 2013">click here</a>&nbsp;to download):&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em><strong>Indian scenario</strong></em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Maternal mortality ratio (MMR)* in India stood at 560 maternal deaths (per 100000 live births) during 1990, 460 during 1995, 370 during 2000, 280 during 2005 and 190 during 2013.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; As compared to India (MMR: 190 per 100000 live births), Brazil (MMR: 69) and China (MMR: 32) performed better in reducing maternal deaths.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; An Indian woman&rsquo;s lifetime risk of maternal death** &ndash; the probability that a 15 year old woman will eventually die from a maternal cause &ndash; is 1 in 190, whereas for a Chinese woman it is 1 in 1800 and for a Brazilian woman it is 1 in 780.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; At the country level, the two countries that accounted for one third of all global maternal deaths are India at 17 percent (50000) and Nigeria at 14 percent (40000).&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The proportion of deaths among women of reproductive age that are due to maternal causes (PM)*** in India is 6.7 percent whereas for China it is 1.6 percent and for Brazil it is 2.8 percent.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The ten countries that comprised 58 percent of the global maternal deaths reported in 2013 are: India (50000, 17%); Nigeria (40000, 14%); Democratic Republic of the Congo (21000, 7%); Ethiopia (13000, 4%); Indonesia (8800, 3%); Pakistan (7900, 3%); United Republic of Tanzania (7900, 3%); Kenya (6300, 2%); China (5900, 2%); Uganda (5900, 2%).&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; India could reduce MMR by 65 percent between 1990 and 2013.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The present report has classified India among 96 countries with incomplete civil registration and/or other types of maternal mortality data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em><strong>Global scenario</strong></em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Every day, approximately 800 women die from preventable causes related to pregnancy and childbirth.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Under MDG5, countries committed to reducing maternal mortality by three quarters between 1990 and 2015. Since 1990, maternal deaths worldwide have dropped by 45%. However, between 1990 and 2013, the global maternal mortality ratio (i.e. the number of maternal deaths per 100 000 live births) declined by only 2.6% per year. This is far from the annual decline of 5.5% required to achieve MDG5.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; 99 percent of all maternal deaths occur in developing countries. More than half of these deaths occur in sub-Saharan Africa and almost one third occur in South Asia.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The maternal mortality ratio in developing countries in 2013 is 230 per 100 000 live births versus 16 per 100 000 live births in developed countries.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; A woman&rsquo;s lifetime risk of maternal death &ndash; the probability that a 15 year old woman will eventually die from a maternal cause &ndash; is 1 in 3700 in developed countries, versus 1 in 160 in developing countries.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Maternal mortality is higher in women living in rural areas and among poorer communities.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Young adolescents face a higher risk of complications and death as a result of pregnancy than older women.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The major complications that account for 80% of all maternal deaths are: a. severe bleeding (mostly bleeding after childbirth); b. infections (usually after childbirth); c. high blood pressure during pregnancy (pre-eclampsia and eclampsia); and d. unsafe abortion. The remainder are caused by or associated with diseases such as malaria, and AIDS during pregnancy. Skilled care before, during and after childbirth can save the lives of women and newborn babies.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; While levels of antenatal care have increased in many parts of the world during the past decade, only 46 percent of women in low-income countries benefit from skilled care during childbirth.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Other factors that prevent women from receiving or seeking care during pregnancy and childbirth are: poverty, distance, lack of information, inadequate services and cultural practices.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Note:&nbsp;</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">* Maternal mortality ratio (MMR) is the number of maternal deaths during a given time period per 100000 live births during the same time period.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">** Adult lifetime risk of maternal death is the probability that a 15-year-old women will die eventually from a maternal cause.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">*** Proportion of deaths among women of reproductive age that are due to maternal causes (PM) is the number of maternal deaths in a given time period divided by the total deaths among women aged 15&ndash;49 years.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Rural%20Health%20Statistics%20of%20India%202012.pdf" title="Rural Health Statistics of India 2012">click here</a> to access the latest edition of [inside]Rural Health Statistics in India 2012[/inside] that was released by the Union health ministry. The report provides detailed statistics on rural health infrastructure on the basis of information available up to March, 2012 and data provided by the States and Union Territories.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> According to the UNICEF report titled [inside]Committing to Child Survival: A Promise Renewed Progress Report 2013[/inside] (please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/APR_Progress_Report_2013_9_Sept_2013_1.pdf" title="UNICEF child mortality report">click here</a> to download):<br /> <br /> <strong><em>Indian scenario</em></strong><br /> <br /> &bull; Under Five Mortality Rate (Probability of dying between birth and exactly 5 years of age, expressed per 1,000 live births) in India for the year 2012, stands at 56 and India&#39;s ranking in terms of U5MR is 49. In 2012, the neonatal mortality rate (Probability of dying in the first month of life, expressed per 1,000 live births) at national level is at 31. The share of neonatal deaths in under-five deaths stood at 55 percent in 2012 as compared to 41 percent in 1990.&nbsp;&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; U5MR in India declined by 55 percent from 126 in 1990 to 56 in 2012. Infant Mortality Rate (Probability of dying between birth and exactly 1 year of age, expressed per 1,000 live births) declined from 88 in 1990 to 44 in 2012. Neonatal mortality rate declined from 51 in 1990 to 31 in 2012.&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; U5MR in India among boys declined from 121 in 1990 to 54 in 2012. U5MR in India among girls declined from 130 in 1990 to 59 in 2012.<br /> <br /> &bull; In 2012, 21 percent deaths among Indian children under 5 years of age occurred due to pneumonia, 10 percent due to diarrhoea, 1 percent due to malaria, 3 percent due to measles and 43 percent due to neonatal causes.<br /> <br /> &bull; Half of all under-five deaths occur in just five countries: India (22%), Nigeria (13%), Pakistan, the Democratic Republic of the Congo (each 6%) and China (4%).<br /> <br /> &bull; Around two-thirds of neonatal deaths occur in just 10 countries, with India accounting for more than one-quarter and Nigeria for a tenth. More than 4 in 10 of all neonatal deaths worldwide occur in just three countries: India, Nigeria, and Pakistan.<br /> <br /> &bull; More than half of the under-five deaths caused by pneumonia or diarrhoea occur in just four countries: India, Nigeria, Pakistan and the Democratic Republic of the Congo.<br /> <br /> &bull; The Governments of Ethiopia, India and the United States, together with the UN agency, launched in 2012 &lsquo;Committing to Child Survival: A Promise Renewed&#39;, a global effort to accelerate efforts to stop young children from dying from preventable causes. Some 176 governments have signed on, including those making some of the greatest strides in under-five mortality.<br /> <br /> &bull; In February 2013, the Government of India, another cosponsor of the global Call to Action, convened a national forum of state policymakers, technical advisors, civil society organizations and private-sector partners to identify and commit to high-impact strategies that can accelerate the decline in preventable child deaths.<br /> <br /> <strong><em>Global scenario</em></strong><br /> <br /> &bull; In 2012, around 6.6 million children died globally before their fifth birthday, at a rate of around 18,000 per day. Since 1990, 216 million children have died before their fifth birthday &mdash; more than the current total population of Brazil, the world&rsquo;s fifth most populous country.<br /> <br /> &bull; Of the 6.6 million under-five deaths globally in 2012, most were from preventable causes such as pneumonia, diarrhoea or malaria; around 44% of deaths in children under 5 occurred during the neonatal period. Pneumonia and diarrhoea remain leading causes of deaths among children under 5, killing almost 5,000 children under 5 every day. Malaria remains an important cause of child death, killing 1,200 children under 5 every day.<br /> <br /> &bull; Global progress in reducing child deaths since 1990 has been very significant. The global rate of under-five mortality has roughly halved, from 90 deaths per 1,000 live births in 1990 to 48 per 1,000 in 2012. The estimated annual number of under-five deaths has fallen from 12.6 million to 6.6 million over the same period.<br /> <br /> &bull; Put another way, 17,000 fewer children die each day in 2012 than did in 1990 &mdash; thanks to more effective and affordable treatments, innovative ways of delivering critical interventions to the poor and excluded, and sustained political commitment. These and other vital child survival interventions have helped to save an estimated 90 million lives in the past 22 years.<br /> <br /> &bull; The global annual rate of reduction in under-five deaths has steadily accelerated since 1990-1995, when it stood at 1.2%, more than tripling to 3.9% in 2005-2012. Both sub-Saharan African regions&mdash;particularly Eastern and Southern Africa but also West and Central Africa&mdash;have seen a consistent acceleration in reducing under-five deaths, particularly since 2000.<br /> <br /> &bull; At the current rate of reduction in under-five mortality, the world will only make MDG 4 by 2028 &mdash; 13 years after the deadline &mdash; and 35 million more children will die between 2015 and 2028 whose lives could be saved if we were able to make the goal on time in 2015 and continue that trend.<br /> <br /> &bull; Accelerating progress in child survival urgently requires greater attention to ending preventable child deaths in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia, which together account for 4 out of 5 under-five deaths globally.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to the [inside]Pneumonia Progress Report, 2012[/inside], released by IVAC and John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012.pdf" title="Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012">click here</a> to access:</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The 2000-2010 decade brought a significant reduction in overall child mortality, from 9.6 to 7.6 million. Pneumonia continues to be the number one killer of children around the world-causing 18% of all child mortality, an estimated 1.3 million child deaths in 2011 alone.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Nearly 99 percent of all pneumonia deaths occur in developing countries, and three-quarters take place in just 15 countries. The majority of pneumonia cases are preventable or treatable.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Pneumonia is the leading cause of child mortality in India, responsible for the deaths of nearly 400,000 &nbsp;children under five in 2010.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Percentage of Indian children with suspected pneumonia receiving antibiotics stood at 13 percent in 2010.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Percentage of under-five Indian children with suspected pneumonia taken to appropriate health-care provider stood at 69 percent in 2010.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Percentage of children receiving exclusive breastfeeding in first 6 months of life is 46 percent (as per latest available data during 2006-2010).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Vaccine coverage in the case of DTP3 (third dose of diphtheria and tetanus toxoid and pertussis vaccine) is 72 percent and in the case of measles is 74 percent in 2011.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; India and Nigeria, two large countries with the highest numbers of child deaths worldwide, remain low scorers with an average intervention coverage (interventions in terms of vaccination, breastfeeding, access to care and antibiotic treatment) rate of 55% and 40%, respectively.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; One notable area of progress in India is on coverage of two vaccines that can help prevent pneumonia, Hib vaccine and measles vaccine. While Hib vaccine uptake has been slow in India&rsquo;s public sector, momentum is now shifting following efforts by the Ministry of Health &amp; Family Welfare (MOHFW), states, health experts and advocates to prioritize implementation of the National Technical Advisory Group on Immunization&rsquo;s (NTAGI) recommendation to add Hib to the Universal Immunization Programme (UIP).&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Two Indian states, Tamil Nadu and Kerala, introduced Hib vaccines (in the form of the pentavalent vaccine) in December 2011, and six more are slated to do so by the end of 2012. At a recent Hib Symposium in the state of Odisha, MOHFW officials stated that at least twice as many additional states have expressed interest in the vaccine.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; India has joined other WHO Member States in introducing a second dose of measles vaccine into the UIP to ensure its children are protected from the virus, which contributes to the burden of pneumonia. Measles was once one of the leading causes of death in children, but global measles deaths have declined dramatically because of widespread coverage with two doses of measles vaccine. India began a phased introduction of the second dose in 2010; by the end of the first year, the second dose of measles vaccine had been added to routine immunization in 21 states and catch-up campaigns were completed in 197 districts in 14 states.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to the report titled: [inside]Defeating malaria in Asia, the Pacific, Americas, Middle East and Europe, November, 2012[/inside], which has been produced by World Health Organization and PATH,&nbsp;<a href="http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Defeating%20malaria.pdf">http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Defeating%20malaria.pdf</a>: &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The Indian Commission on Macroeconomics and Health notes that, in India, 13 household person-days per patient were lost per episode of malaria. Furthermore, the commission estimated that the overall monetary losses to families (income losses together with treatment expenses) could amount to between 200 and 400 Indian rupees (US$ 3.5 to 7).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; With an estimated 22.5 million malaria cases in India, this translates to an annual cost of US$ 79 to 157 million, or 0.01% of gross domestic product each year.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In states with the highest incidence rates, such as Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Meghalaya, Mizoram, and Orissa, the annual cost of illness represents more than 0.1% of a gross state income.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Tribal populations living in forests in Orissa, India, have incidence rates that are almost 10 times higher than in the plains.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Odisha is one of the most highly malaria-endemic states in India, accounting for 24% of reported cases in 2010 despite consisting of less of than 4% of the national population. Malaria is particularly common among tribal groups which represent 44% of the population of Orissa.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; A study in Sundargarh District of Odisha showed that forest areas had an annual incidence of 280 cases per 1000 population compared to 30 cases per 1000 on the plains. Approximately 84% of infections in forest areas were due to P. falciparum compared to 69% in plain areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Malaria&rsquo;s main victims tend to be poorer populations living in rural communities, with limited or no access to long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; WHO estimates that 216 million cases of malaria occurred globally in 2010; 34 million (16%) of these occurred outside of Africa of which 18.1 million (53%) were due to P. falciparum.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; WHO estimates that 655 000 deaths occurred globally, of which 46 000 (7%) occurred outside of Africa. WHO estimates that 2.5 billion people were at risk of malaria outside of Africa.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; There are 98 countries with ongoing transmission of malaria. Of these, 47 lie on the African continent, 21 are in the Americas, and 30 in Europe, Asia, and the Pacific. Of the 98 countries, 81 are in the control phase, 8 in the pre-elimination phase, and 9 in the elimination phase.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; While the disease burden has been declining in countries with fewer malaria cases and deaths, progress has been slower in countries where the bulk of the disease burden lies: India, Indonesia, Myanmar, Pakistan, and Papua New Guinea. These five high-burden countries account for 89% of all malaria cases in the region.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Malaria transmission occurs in 17 countries of Asia. Approximately 2 billion people in the region live at some risk of malaria, of which 525 million live at high risk (reported incidence more than 1 case per 1000 population per year).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Most reported cases of malaria in Asia are due to P. falciparum although the proportion varies considerably by country; it exceeds 80% in the Lao People&rsquo;s Democratic Republic, Myanmar, Timor-Leste, and Viet Nam, while transmission is exclusively due to P. vivax in the Democratic People&rsquo;s Republic of Korea and the Republic of Korea.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Insecticide resistance has now been reported in 24 out of 51 countries with malaria transmission outside of Africa.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to [inside]Children in India 2012-A Statistical Appraisal[/inside], Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, GoI, please <a href="https://im4change.org/docs/659Children_in_India_2012.pdf">click here</a> to access:</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em><strong>Neonatal Mortality Rate</strong></em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2010, the neonatal mortality rate (Probability of dying in the first month of life, expressed per 1,000 live births) at national level is at 33 and ranges from 19 in urban areas to 36 in rural areas. Among bigger states, neo-natal mortality rate is highest in Madhya Pradesh (44) and lowest in Kerala (7).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The rural&ndash;urban gap in neo natal mortality rate was highest in Andhra Pradesh and Assam (23 points), followed by Rajasthan (22 points). The rural &ndash;urban gap in neo natal mortality rate lowest in Kerala (3 points), followed by Tamil Nadu (6 points).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Factors which affect fetal and neonatal deaths are primarily endogenous, while those which affect post neonatal deaths are primarily exogenous. The endogenous factors are related to the formation of the foetus in the womb and are therefore, mainly biological in nature. Among the biological factors affecting fetal and neonatal infant mortality rates the important ones are the age of the mother, birth order, period of spacing between births, prematurity, weight at birth, mothers health.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em><strong>Infant Mortality Rate&nbsp;</strong></em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Infant Mortality Rate (Probability of dying between birth and exactly 1 year of age, expressed per 1,000 live births) has declined for males from 78 in 1990 to 46 in 2010 and for females the decline was from 81 to 49 during this period.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Infant Mortality Rate for the country as a whole declined from 66 in 2001 to 47 in 2010. With the present improved trend due to sharp fall during 2008-09, the national level estimate of infant mortality rate is likely to be 44 against the MDG target of 27 in 2015.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Infant Mortality Rate has declined in urban areas from 50 in 1990 to 31 in 2010, whereas in rural areas Infant Mortality Rate has declined from 86 to 51 during the same period.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Infant Mortality Rate in 2010, was lowest in Goa (10) followed by Kerala (13) and Manipur (14). The States of Madhya Pradesh (62), Orissa (61), Uttar Pradesh (61), Assam (58), Meghalaya (55), Rajasthan (55), Chhattisgarh (51), Bihar (48) and Haryana (48) reported infant mortality rate above the national average (47).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Among infants, the main causes of death are: Certain Conditions Originating in the Perinatal Period (67.2%), Certain infectious and Parasitic diseases (8.3%), Diseases of the Respiratory System (7.7%), Congenial Malformations, Deformations &amp; chromosomal Abnormalities (3.3%), Other causes (10.6%).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em><strong>Under Five Mortality Rate&nbsp;</strong></em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Under Five Mortality Rate (Probability of dying between birth and exactly 5 years of age, expressed per 1,000 live births) in India for the year 2010, stands at 59 and it varies from 66 in rural areas to 38 in Urban areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Under Five Mortality Rate stood at 64 for females whereas it is 55 for males in 2010.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Under Five Mortality Rate varies from lowest in Kerala (15), followed by 27 in Tamil Nadu to alarmingly high level in Assam (83), followed by Madhya Pradesh (82), Uttar Pradesh (79) and Odisha (78).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Given to reduce Under Five Mortality Rate to 42 per thousand live births by 2015, India tends to reach near to 52 by that year missing the target by 10 percentage points.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Among children aged 0 to 4 years, the main causes of death are: Certain infectious and Parasitic Diseases (23.1%), Diseases of the Respiratory System (16.1%), Diseases of the Nervous System (12.1%), Diseases of the Circulatory System (7.9%), Injury, Poisoning etc (0.9%), Other major causes (33.9 %).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em><strong>Immunization</strong></em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; At national level, 61% of the children aged 12-23 months have received full immunization in 2009. The coverage of immunization was higher in urban areas (67.4%) as compared to that in the rural areas (58.5%).&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Nearly 8% Indian children did not receive even a single vaccine in 2009. Nearly 62% of the male children aged 12-23 months have received full immunization, while among the females it was nearly 60%.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; 76.6 percent of children aged 12-23 months received full immunization coverage whose mothers had 12 or more years of education whereas 45.3 percent of children whose mothers had no education got full immunization.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; About 75.5% of children of less than one year belonging to the highest wealth index group are fully immunized while only 47.3% from the lowest quintile are fully immunized.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The full immunization coverage of children age 12-23 months is highest in Goa (87.9%), followed by Sikkim (85.3%), Punjab (83.6%), and Kerala (81.5%). The full immunization coverage is lowest in Arunachal Pradesh (24.8%).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to [inside]WHO Global Report: Mortality Attributable to Tobacco (2012)[/inside], please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Mortality%20due%20to%20tobacco.pdf" title="Mortality due to tobacco">click here</a> to access:&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Globally 12% of all deaths among adults aged 30 years and over were attributed to tobacco as compared with 16% in India, 17% in Pakistan and 31% in Bangladesh.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In India, the death rate from non-communicable diseases (NCDs) [1096 per 100,000 population] was about 3.3 times that for communicable diseases [336 per 100,000]. Tobacco was responsible for 9% of all NCDs as compared with 2% of all communicable disease related deaths.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The death rate due to tobacco in Indian men was 206 [per 100,000 men aged 30 years and over] as compared with 13 [per 100,000 women aged 30 years and over] for women. The proportion of deaths attributable to tobacco was almost 12% for men and 1% for women in India. &nbsp; &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Within the NCDs, ischaemic heart disease accounted for 329 deaths per 100,000 population aged 30 years and over, with 5% of these deaths attributed to tobacco in India. Cancer of the trachea, bronchus and lung accounted for 16 deaths per 100,000 population but with 58% of these deaths attributed to tobacco.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Within the communicable disease group, deaths attributed to tobacco accounted for 5% of all lower respiratory infection deaths and 4% of all tuberculosis deaths in India. &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The regions with the highest proportion of deaths atrributable to tobacco are the Americas and the European regions where tobacco has been used for a longer period of time.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; 71% of all lung cancer deaths globally are attributable to tobacco use. 42% of all chronic deaths globally are attributable to tobacco use.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Direct tobacco smoking is currently responsible for the death of about 5 million people worldwide each year with many deaths occuring prematurely. An additional 600,000 people are estimated to die from the effects of second-hand smoke.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In next 2 decades, the annual death from tobacco globally is expected to rise to over 8 million, with more than 80% of those deaths projected to occur in low-and middle-income countries.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; If effective measures are not urgently taken, tpbacco could in the 21st century kill over 1 billion people worldwide. Tobacco kills more than tuberculosis, HIV/ AIDS and malaria combined.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to the report titled [inside]The Growing Danger of Non-Communicable Diseases: Acting Now to Reverse Course (2011)[/inside], September, The World Bank, please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/The%20Growing%20Danger%20of%20Non-Communicable%20Diseases.pdf" title="The Growing Danger of Non-Communicable Diseases">click here</a> to access:</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> &bull; Heart disease, cancer, diabetes, chronic respiratory conditions, and other non-communicable diseases (NCDs) increasingly threaten the physical health and economic security of many lower-and middle-income countries.<br /> <br /> &bull; The change in mortality and disease levels will be particularly substantial in Sub-Saharan Africa, where NCDs will account for 46 percent of all deaths by 2030, up from 28 percent in 2008, and in South Asia, which will see the share of deaths from NCDs increase from 51 to 72 percent during the same period. More than 30 percent of these deaths will be premature and preventable. These lower-income countries will, at the same time, continue to grapple with the widespread prevalence of communicable diseases such as HIV, malaria, tuberculosis, and mother and child conditions, and so face a &ldquo;double burden&rdquo; of disease not experienced by their wealthier counterparts.<br /> <br /> &bull; The potential cost of NCDs to economies, health systems, households and individuals in middle- and lower-income countries is high. In many middle- and lower-income countries, NCDs are affecting populations at younger ages, resulting in longer periods of ill-health, premature deaths and greater loss of productivity that is so vital for development.<br /> <br /> &bull; Much of the rise in NCDs in developing countries is attributable to modifiable risk factors such as physical inactivity, malnutrition in the first thousand days of life and later an unhealthy diet (including excessive salt, fat, and sugar intake), tobacco use, alcohol abuse, and exposure to environmental pollution.<br /> <br /> &bull; Country evidence suggests that more than half of the NCD burden could be avoided through effective health promotion and disease prevention programs that tackle such risk factors. Particularly effective at very low costs are measures to curb tobacco, such as taxes, as indicated in the &ldquo;WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control&rdquo;, and to reduce salt in processed and semi processed foods.<br /> <br /> &bull; By 2030, cancer incidence is projected to increase by 70 percent in middle-income countries and 82 percent in lower-income countries.<br /> <br /> &bull; While increases in NCD-related mortality and ill-health in part reflect countries&rsquo; successes in extending lives and curbing communicable diseases, a significant part of the increase is a result of modifiable risk factors, many of which are linked to modernization, urbanization, and lifestyle changes.<br /> <br /> &bull; The rise of NCDs amongst younger populations may jeopardize many countries&rsquo; &ldquo;demographic dividend&rdquo;, including the economic benefits expected to be generated during the period when a relatively larger part of the population is of working age. Instead, these countries will have to contend with the costs associated with populations that are living with longer episodes of illhealth.<br /> <br /> &bull; Cardiovascular disease is already a major cause of death and disability in South Asia, where the average age of first-time heart attack sufferers is 53 compared to 59 in the rest of the world.<br /> <br /> &bull; A recent study illustrated the economic impact of NCDs in India by estimating that if NCDs were &ldquo;eliminated&rdquo;, the country&rsquo;s 2004 GDP would have been 4 to 10 percent greater.<br /> <br /> &bull; The share of out-of-pocket household health expenditures on NCDs in India increased from 32 percent to 47 percent between 1995&ndash;1996 and 2004. Moreover, 40 percent of these expenditures were financed by borrowing and sales of assets, increasing the household&rsquo;s financial vulnerability. NCDs also increase the risk of households incurring &ldquo;catastrophic&rdquo; health costs. In South Asia, the chance of incurring catastrophic hospitalization expenditures was 160 percent higher for cancer patients and 30 percent higher for those with cardiovascular diseases than it was for those with a communicable disease requiring hospitalization .<br /> <br /> &bull; Because of their specific characteristics, NCDs affect adults&mdash;often in their productive years, require costly long term treatment and care, and often are accompanied by some degree of disability. Therefore, they could potentially have greater socio-economic impact than other health conditions. Increased NCD levels can: reduce labor supply and outputs, increase costs to employers (from absenteeism and higher health care coverage costs), lower returns on human capital investments, reduced domestic consumption and lower tax revenues, as well as increased public health and social welfare expenditures.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to the report titled: [inside]AIDS at 30: Nations at the crossroads (2011)[/inside], which has been brought out by UNAIDS, please <a href="http://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/media_asset/aids-at-30_1.pdf">click here</a> to access:&nbsp;&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; The number of people living with HIV was around 34 million worldwide in 2010.<br /> <br /> &bull; There were 2.6 million new HIV infections worldwide in 2009.<br /> <br /> &bull; Between 1981 and 2000, the number of people living with HIV rose from less than one million to an estimated 27.5 million [26&ndash;29 million].<br /> <br /> &bull; Low- and middle-income countries accounted for 95% or more of the global HIV burden by 1998.<br /> <br /> &bull; While less than 1% of adults in South Africa were living with HIV in 1990, 16.1% were living with HIV a decade later. During the same period, adult HIV prevalence rose from less than 1% to 24.5% in Lesotho, and from 3.5% to 26% in Botswana.<br /> <br /> &bull; Half of HIV infections in Eastern Europe and Central Asia in 2010 were due to drug users sharing needles.<br /> <br /> &bull; Clinical trials show that male circumcision reduces the chance of men becoming HIV-positive by about 60%.<br /> <br /> &bull; Beginning in 2005, a series of randomized controlled trials in sub-Saharan Africa found that circumsising adult men reduced their risk of infection by about 60%.<br /> <br /> &bull; Scientific knowledge about HIV expanded steadily in the years 1981&ndash;2000. The virus was identified in 1983, and the first serologic test became available in 1985. In the 1990s, studies demonstrated in developed and low- and middle-income countries the possibility of significantly lowering the risk of vertical transmission.<br /> <br /> &bull; Today, 94% of countries (162 of 172 countries reporting) have national HIV strategic plans, up from 87% in 2006. The coordination of national responses also improved during the epidemic&rsquo;s third decade. Two out of three (67%) countries in 2010 reported having a single HIV monitoring and evaluation system, up from 46% in 2006, although country reports cite insufficient coordination of diverse partners as a continuing challenge to national responses.<br /> <br /> &bull; According to the latest UNGASS reports, AIDS expenditures in 2009 totalled US$ 1.07 billion. Estimates based on the methodology suggested by the Commission on AIDS in Asia indicate that US$ 3.3 billion is needed for a targeted response across the region.<br /> <br /> &bull; There was a significant increase in investment in the HIV response in low- and middle-income countries between 2001 and 2009, with total expenditure rising nearly 10-fold, from US$ 1.6 billion to US$ 15.9 billion.<br /> <br /> &bull; Public and private domestic resources accounted for 52% of total spending on HIV programmes in low- and middle-income countries in 2009, but many low-income countries remain heavily dependent on external financing. In 56 countries, international donors supply at least 70% of HIV resources. This pattern potentially encourages the emergence of new global inequities, as millions of people in sub-Saharan Africa now rely on external donors on a daily basis for the drugs and services that keep them alive.<br /> <br /> &bull; The UNAIDS Domestic Investment Priority Index, a formula that accounts for total HIV burden and government resources, shows that eight of 14 countries in West and Central Africa, six of 16 countries in Eastern and Southern Africa, and all but four countries in Asia were allocating inadequate resources to HIV in&nbsp; 2009.<br /> <br /> &bull; According to research from nine countries under the People Living with HIV Stigma Index, 53% of Rwandans living with HIV have been verbally insulted, 33% of rural Zambians living with HIV have experienced physical violence, and 65% of Rwandans living with HIV have lost a job or income opportunity. Furthermore, women living with HIV from various countries report abuses of their sexual and reproductive health and rights. Nearly 20% of women in Namibia who participated in discussions and interviews with the International Community of Women Living with HIV (ICW), reported that they had been coerced or forced into sterilization. Such deep-seated social ostracism and discriminatory actions discourage people from being tested for HIV or seeking other needed services.<br /> <br /> &bull; Among young women in South Africa, experience of intimate partner violence increases the odds of becoming infected with HIV by 11.9%, while gender inequality within a relationship increases the risk by 13.9%, according to a study reported in The Lancet in 2010.<br /> <br /> &bull; According to the UNAIDS Global Report 2010, the proportion of countries reporting programmes to address stigma and discrimination increased from 39% in 2006 to 92% in 2010, although a budget for these programmes was in place in less than half of these countries.<br /> <br /> &bull; More than 56 countries have laws that specifically criminalize HIV transmission or exposure, with the majority of prosecutions reported in high-income countries. As of April 2011, 47 countries, territories and areas imposed some form of restriction on the entry, stay and residence of people living with HIV. However, in a more positive development, China, Namibia and USA lifted their HIV-related travel restrictions in 2010, while Ecuador and India clarified that no such restrictions were in place.<br /> <br /> &bull; In 116 countries, territories and areas, some aspect of sex work is criminalized. Seventy-nine countries and territories worldwide criminalize consensual same-sex sexual relations, including 85% of countries in Eastern and Southern Africa, 81% in the Middle East and North Africa, and 69% in the Caribbean.<br /> <br /> &bull; Thirty-two countries have laws that allow for the death penalty for drug-related offences, and 27 provide for the compulsory detention of people who use drugs, often without due process or minimum standards of detention or treatment. Such laws, as well as abusive law enforcement and poor access to legal services, deter individuals from seeking needed services, increase their vulnerability to becoming HIV-positive, and intensify their social isolation.<br /> <br /> &bull; As of December 2010, an estimated 6.6 million people in low- and middle-income countries were receiving antiretroviral therapy, an increase of 1.4 million from a year earlier. Between 2001 and 2010, the number of people receiving antiretroviral treatment rose nearly 22-fold, a vivid illustration of the power of international solidarity, innovative approaches and people-centred responses.<br /> <br /> &bull; In sub-Saharan Africa the number of people receiving antiretroviral treatment in 2010 increased by 31%; in the Middle East and North Africa, that figure was 21%.<br /> <br /> &bull; As of December 2009, seven countries had already reached at least 80% of treatment-eligible individuals with antiretroviral treatment. Eighteen countries reported treatment coverage of at least 60%.<br /> <br /> &bull; Since its emergence in 1996, highly active anti retroviral therapy has saved an estimated 14.4 million life years worldwide as of December 2009. Although 54% of life-years saved between 1995 and 2009 were in Western Europe and North America, where antiretroviral therapy has long been available, 3.7 million life-years have been saved in sub-Saharan Africa. The pace of reducing morbidity and mortality in sub-Saharan Africa has accelerated since 2005 as a result of dramatic programme scale-up.<br /> <br /> &bull; In 2009, nearly one in five people (18%) who started antiretroviral therapy in low- and middle-income countries were no longer in care 12 months later.<br /> <br /> &bull; At present, more than 95% of patients on treatment are on first-generation antiretroviral medicines, the majority of which are off-patent. As drug resistance increases over time, more patients will require second- and third-generation medicines. Most of these more recent medicines will remain under patent protection for years to come, resulting in potentially drastic increases in treatment costs. This can be alleviated to a large extent by making use of the flexibilities of public health related TRIPS (trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights). In March 2011, UNAIDS, WHO and UNDP issued a policy brief calling on all countries to use TRIPS flexibilities to lower costs and improve access to HIV treatment. By 2005, five years after affordable means of preventing vertical transmission became available, only 15% of HIV-positive pregnant women in low- and middle-income countries received antiretroviral prophylaxis.<br /> <br /> &bull; More than 50% of pregnant women who tested positive for HIV in 2010 were assessed for their eligibility to receive antiretroviral therapy for their own health. These gains in reducing vertical transmission have helped to reduce childhood mortality. The number of children newly infected with HIV in 2009 (370 000 [230 000&ndash;510 000]) was 26% lower than in 2001.<br /> <br /> &bull; According to the most recent population-based surveys in low- and middle-income countries with available data, only 24% of young women and 36% of young men responded correctly when asked five questions about HIV prevention methods and popular misconceptions about HIV transmission. Young women tend to be less likely than young men to be aware of the prevention benefits of consistent condom use. When prompted, 74% of young males in DHS surveys knew that using a condom helps to prevent HIV infection, while only 49% of young females knew the right answer. Some 78% of young males also knew that having a single, faithful partner lowers the risk of HIV infection, compared to only 59% of young females.<br /> <br /> &bull; In 14 countries where HIV prevalence exceeds 2% and where nationally representative data are available, more than 70% of men and women who had high-risk sex in the past year report not using a condom the last time they had sex.<br /> <br /> &bull; Globally, HIV prevalence levels above those reported in the general population have been documented among men who have sex with men (MSM), transgender people, people who inject drugs (IDUs), and sex workers.<br /> <br /> &bull; According to the most recently available data, the proportion of countries reporting that they conduct systematic surveillance of HIV among key populations increased between 2008 and 2010: for sex workers, from 44% to 50%; for MSM, from 30% to 36%; while among IDUs it remained stable at 28%.<br /> <br /> &bull; An estimated 20% of the 15.9 million IDUs worldwide are living with HIV. This statistic underscores the world&rsquo;s failure to put the lessons of harm reduction to use. In at least 69 countries where injecting drug use has been documented, no programme to provide even sterile needles and syringes exists.<br /> <br /> &bull; The epidemic among MSM communities is a worldwide phenomenon, with 63 out of 67 countries reporting in 2009 a higher HIV prevalence among MSM compared with the general population.<br /> <br /> &bull; At least 79 countries, territories and areas have laws against male&ndash;male sexual contact, including some that authorize the death penalty.<br /> <br /> &bull; Among 56 countries reporting in both 2008 and 2010, median condom use with the most recent client reached 84%, with a range from about two thirds to nearly 100%.<br /> <br /> &bull; According to recent estimates, HIV is a leading cause of pregnancyrelated deaths, accounting for about 11% of all maternal deaths in 2008.<br /> <br /> &bull; HIV-positive newborns have about a 50% risk of death before age two in the absence of treatment.<br /> <br /> &bull; In 2009, HIV accounted for 2.1% (1.2&ndash;3.0%) of under-five deaths in low- and middle-income countries, a decline from 2.6% (1.6&ndash;3.5%) in 2000.<br /> <br /> &bull; In sub-Saharan Africa, HIV was responsible for 3.6% (2.0&ndash;5.0%) of all deaths in children under five in 2009. Here, too, striking achievements are evident, as the HIV share of all under-five deaths has sharply fallen from the 5.4% (3.3%&ndash;7.3%) reported in 2000.<br /> <br /> &bull; Universal access to effective prevention, diagnosis and treatment for HIV-related tuberculosis (TB) could prevent up to one million TB deaths in people living with HIV between now and 2015, but the world is falling far short of this target.<br /> <br /> &bull; Only 28% of TB patients globally knew their HIV status in 2009, and only 5% of people living with HIV were screened for TB. Although early initiation of antiretroviral therapy significantly reduces the risk of death among HIV-positive people with TB, only 37% of these HIV-positive TB patients got HIV therapy in 2009.<br /> <br /> &bull; According to data compiled by WHO, 10 countries accounted for more than 69% of all people with HIV-related TB in 2009.<br /> <br /> &bull; 25% of all TB deaths are in people with HIV, and there are one million cases of TB in people with HIV a year.<br /> <br /> &bull; Between 2001 and 2009, global HIV incidence steadily declined, with the annual rate of new infections falling by nearly 25%.<br /> <br /> &bull; Above-average declines in HIV incidence have occurred in sub-Saharan Africa and in South and South-East Asia, while Latin America and the Caribbean and Oceania regions experienced more modest reductions of less than 25%.<br /> <br /> &bull; Rates of new infections have remained relatively stable in East Asia, Western and Central Europe, and North America. HIV incidence has steadily increased in the Middle East and North Africa, while in Eastern Europe and Central Asia, a decline in new infections was reversed mid-decade, with incidence rising slightly from 2005 to 2009.<br /> <br /> &bull; Coverage of services to prevent new child infections increased from 15% in 2005 to 54% in 2009. The HIV incidence rate declined by more than 25% between 2001 and 2009. Antiretroviral treatment coverage is increasing.<br /> <br /> &bull; Some 22.5 million people now live with HIV in Africa. The majority (60%) are women and girls. HIV prevalence is as high as 25% in some countries, and the rate of people becoming newly infected outpaces treatment access. Of the 16.6 million children globally who have lost one or both parents to an AIDS-related illness, 14.9 million are in Africa.<br /> <br /> &bull; The Asia Pacific region has made significant progress in controlling HIV&rsquo;s spread. The number of people living with HIV has remained stable for the past five years and estimated new infections are 20% lower than in 2001. Thailand, Cambodia and certain parts of India have turned their epidemics around by providing quality services to their key populations at higher risk.<br /> <br /> &bull; In 2009, median reported prevention coverage for people who inject drugs was 17%; for men who have sex with men 36.5%; and for female sex workers 41%. Programmes in key affected populations to prevent transmission to intimate sexual partners are severely lacking.<br /> <br /> **page**<br /> &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Please <a href="https://im4change.org/hunger-hdi/sdgs-113.html?pgno=5#trends-in-maternal-mortality-1990-to-2008-estimates">click here</a> to access the Trends in Maternal Mortality: 1990 to 2008 Estimates developed by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA and The World Bank:</span><br /> &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">According to [inside]A Fair Chance at Life: Why Equity Matters for Children (2010)[/inside], which has been prepared by Save the Children, please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/A%20fair%20chance%20of%20life.pdf" title="A fair chance of life">click here</a> to access:</span><br /> <span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp; </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;In 2000, the world&rsquo;s governments committed themselves to make a two-thirds reduction in the child mortality rate by 2015 &ndash; the fourth of eight United Nations Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). But with five years to go before the target date, the world is collectively off track to reach MDG 4. Just 40% of the necessary progress has been achieved so far, and in three-quarters of countries the goal will be missed on current trends.&nbsp; </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The child mortality rate at a global level has fallen by just 28% since the MDG baseline year of 1990, far short of the 67% reduction required to meet the goal. Less than 30% of countries are making equitable progress towards MDG 4.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Ghana, Mozambique, Niger, Egypt, Indonesia, Bolivia and Zambia have made equitable progress in reducing child mortality. Chad, Congo, Kenya, South Africa and Zimbabwe have actually seen increases in their child mortality rates since 1990. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;In sub-Saharan Africa, close to one child in seven still dies before their fifth birthday. Although the mortality rate in sub-Saharan Africa has fallen, high fertility levels mean that the absolute number of child deaths in the region has increased since 1990, from 4.2 to 4.6 million.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Almost all child deaths &ndash; 99% &ndash; happen in the developing world. A person born in sub-Saharan Africa can expect to live, on average, 52 years. In western Europe, life expectancy is 80 years. The life expectancy rates in sub-Saharan Africa today have not been seen in Europe since the beginning of the 20th century. In 40 developing countries, children have less chance of living to the age of five than a person in the UK has of living to the age of 65.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Sri Lanka &ndash; with a per capita income of $1,790 &ndash; has a child mortality rate of 13, less than half the level in Guatemala, which has a per capita income of $2,680. Gabon has an equivalent per capita income to Argentina, but a child mortality rate of 57, almost four times higher.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;In India, high levels of selective abortion contribute to skewed male-to-female birth ratios. Son preference in India and China can result in high mortality among girls because they are not adequately breastfed or given the same access to medical treatment. A study of 4,000 children aged between one and two in India found that the likelihood of girls being fully vaccinated was five percentage points lower than that for boys. In Gujarat, India, 50% of women feel they need the permission of their husband or parent-in-law before taking their sick child to a doctor.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;High child mortality, illness and malnutrition can be a brake on economic and social development. Children who are sick and undernourished, especially in the first two years of life, often pay a life-long and irreversible price in terms of physical stunting and reduced cognitive ability.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;On the positive side, of the 68 &lsquo;Countdown to 2015&rsquo; countries (which together account for 97% of maternal and child deaths worldwide), 60 have reduced child mortality since 1990. A recent study found that the rate of reduction has accelerated since 2000, compared with the period from 1990 to 2000.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Of the 68 &lsquo;Countdown to 2015&rsquo; priority countries, only 19 are on-track to reach MDG 4. Eleven more are making faster-than-average progress, but still not enough progress to achieve MDG 4 by 2015.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;It is estimated that children under five make up 85% of those who die as a result of climate change; 44% of child deaths happen in countries considered fragile; and nearly 70% of the countries with the highest child mortality burden are currently experiencing or have experienced armed violence in the last two decades.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Inadequate care before birth and during delivery contributes to 40% of child deaths. Even babies who survive the neonatal period (up to 28 days) have greatly reduced chances of surviving beyond the age of five if their mothers die, in part because they are less likely to receive adequate nutrition and healthcare.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Although the percentage of stunted children decreased globally from 40% to 27% between 1990 and 2010, the number of stunted children is projected to increase in many areas. In Africa, the number of stunted children is estimated to have increased from 45 million in 1990 to 60 million in 2010.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Undernutrition among pregnant women in developing countries leads to one in six infants being born with low birth weight, which not only carries a high risk of neonatal death, but can also permanently damage long-term cognitive and physical development.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Infectious diseases accounted for an estimated 68% of the 8.8 million child deaths in 2008, with pneumonia accounting for 18% and diarrhoea for 15% of the global total. More than 40% of deaths from pneumonia and diarrhoea take place in sub-Saharan Africa, where 42% of people lack access to an improved water source, and almost 70% are without adequate sanitation.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Improved drinking water sources and proper sanitation are crucial to reducing child deaths from diarrhoea, while an estimated 45% of cases could be prevented by simple hand washing with soap.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;If women and men had equal status, it is estimated that the proportion of underweight children below the age of three years would fall by 13 percentage points globally.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">According to [inside]Women on the Front Lines of Health Care, State of the World&#39;s Mothers 2010[/inside], </span><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Women%20on%20the%20front%20line.pdf" title="Women on the front line">click here</a> to access</span><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">: </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Every year, 50 million women in the developing world give birth with no professional help and 8.8 million children and newborns die from easily preventable or treatable causes. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Worldwide, there are 57 countries with critical health workforce shortages, meaning that they have fewer than 23 doctors, nurses and midwives per 10,000 people. Thirty-six of these countries are in sub-Saharan Africa. Making up for these shortages would require an additional 2.4 million doctors, nurses and midwives.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Thirty-six of the countries with critical health worker shortages are in sub-Saharan Africa, which has 12 percent of the world&rsquo;s population, 25 percent of the global burden of disease, and only 3 percent of the world&rsquo;s health workers. South and East Asia have 29 percent of the disease burden and only 12 percent of the health workers.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;41 percent of the child deaths occur among newborn babies in the first month of life.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;99 percent of child and maternal deaths occur in developing countries where mothers and children lack access to basic health-care services.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;250,000 women&rsquo;s lives and 5.5 million children&rsquo;s lives could be saved each year if all women and children had access to a full package of essential health care.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Every year 8.8 million children die before reaching age 5.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Every year 343,000 women lose their lives due to pregnancy or childbirth complications.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;An additional 4.3 million health workers are needed in developing countries to help save lives and meet the health-related Millennium Development Goals.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The eleventh annual Mothers&rsquo; Index helps document conditions for mothers and children in 160 countries &ndash; 43 developed nations and 117 in the developing world &ndash; and shows where mothers fare best and where they face the greatest hardships.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;European countries &ndash; along with New Zealand and Australia &ndash; dominate the top positions while countries in sub-Saharan Africa dominate the lowest tier.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">According to [inside]Performance Audit-Report No. 8 of 2009-10[/inside], please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Performace%20Audit.pdf" title="Performance audit NRHM">click here</a> to access:</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;This is the latest and an extremely significant report on the status and performance of the National Rural Health Mission (NRHM) all over India providing clues for areas of concern and immediate action. Some of the salient features are as follows:</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The performance audit on implementation of the NRHM was conducted during April-December 2008 in the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, State Health Societies (SHS) of 33 States/UTs, District Health Societies (DHS) of 129 districts and 2369 health centres at block and village levels covering the period from 2005-06 to 2007-08.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The NRHM initiated decentralised bottom-up planning. This, however, had been hindered by non-completion of household and facility surveys and State specific perspective plans. In nine States, district level annual plans were not prepared during 2005-08 and in 24 States/UTs block and village level annual plans had not been prepared at all.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Village level health and sanitation committees were still to be constituted in nine States. The Rogi Kalyan Samitis (RKS) formed at many health centres, aiming at community ownership of healthcare delivery systems, were characterised by weak or absent grievance redressal mechanisms, outreach and awareness generation efforts.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;No RKS in any State/UT received all the stipulated central grants. In 13 States/UTs, the Samiti failed to generate internal resources, while in the remaining States no mechanism existed to monitor the generation of a third of the RKS funds from internal resources as prescribed.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The participation of Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs) in the Mission&rsquo;s activities had not been facilitated and their contribution towards capacity building and service delivery was not effectively monitored. 71 per cent of the districts countrywide were yet to be covered under the Mother NGO scheme.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;During the period 2005-06 to 2007-08, the total outlay/expenditure on the NRHM was Rs. 24,151.45 crore. During the first two years the Centre was contributing 100 per cent of the funds. Thereafter, the States were to contribute 15 per cent of funds during the 11th Five Year Plan (2007-12). However, many of the States were yet to contribute their share to the Mission and this issue needs to be addressed. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Many high focus States where diseases are endemic and health indicators poor, were however, receiving relatively lesser central grants, as high unspent balances of previous years remained, indicating that capacity building needs to be focused on.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Basic facilities (proper buildings, hygienic environment, electricity and water supply etc.) were still absent in many existing health centres with many Primary Health Centres (PHCs) and Community Health Centres (CHCs) being unable to provide guaranteed services such as inpatient services, operation theatres, labour rooms, pathological tests, X-ray facilities and emergency care etc.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;While contract workers have been engaged to fill vacancies, there are still shortages of specialist doctors at CHCs, adequate staff nurses at CHCs/PHCs and Auxiliary Nursing Midwife (ANMs)/ Multi-purpose Worker (MPWs) at Sub Centres.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;In nine States, the stock of essential drugs, contraceptives and vaccines adequate for two months consumption as required under norms were not available in any of the test checked PHCs and CHCs.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Despite holding two National Immunisation Days, six Special National Immunisation Days (and additional rounds in selected districts of Bihar and Uttar Pradesh), 1640 new polio cases had been detected in 17 States/UTs during 2005-08.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> <span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">According to [inside]&lsquo;Diarrhoea: Why children are still dying and what can be done?&rsquo; (2009)[/inside], please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Diarrhoea%20Why%20children%20are%20still%20dying%20and%20what%20can%20be%20done.pdf" title="Diarrhoea Why children are still dying and what can be done">click here</a> to access:</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Diarrhoea is defined as having loose or watery stools at least three times per day, or more frequently than normal for an individual. Though most episodes of childhood diarrhoea are mild, acute cases can lead to death and other complications. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The leading cause of diarrhea is lack of sanitation and safe drinking water and the life threatening disease is very easily curable with simple tablets and rehydration. (An estimated 88 per cent of diarrhoeal deaths worldwide are attributable to unsafe water, inadequate sanitation and poor hygiene.)</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Most pathogens that cause diarrhoea share a similar mode of transmission &ndash; from the stool of one person to the mouth of another.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;In India, under-five mortality rate (per 1000 live births) was 69 during 2008. The number of under-five deaths was 18,30,000 during 2008. The percentage of children under-five with diarrhoea receiving ORS packet during 2005-2008 was 26%.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Nearly, nine million children under five years of age die each year. Diarrhoea is second only to pneumonia as the cause of these deaths.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Reducing these deaths depends largely on delivering life-saving treatment of low-osmolarity oral rehydration salts (ORS) and zinc tablets to all children in need.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Examples of rehydrating fluids include cereal-based drinks made from a thin gruel of rice, maize, potato or other readily available low-cost grain or root crop the family has at home. Breastmilk is also an excellent drink for fluid replacement and should continue to be given to infants with diarrhoea simultaneously with other oral rehydration solutions.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;According to the latest available figures, an estimated 2.5 billion people lack improved sanitation facilities, and nearly one billion people do not have access to safe drinking water. These unsanitary environments allow diarrhoea-causing pathogens to spread more easily.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Globally, 1.2 billion people practise open defecation, 83 per cent of whom live in 13 countries</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Together, pneumonia and diarrhoea are responsible for an estimated 40 per cent of all child deaths around the world each year.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Nearly 1 in 4 people in developing countries were practising indiscriminate or open defecation in 2006.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Nearly one in five child deaths &ndash; about 1.5 million each year &ndash; is due to diarrhoea. It kills more young children than AIDS, malaria and measles combined.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Between 1990 and 2006, the proportion of the developing world&rsquo;s population using an improved drinking water source rose from 71 per cent to 84 per cent. Still, almost 1 billion people lack access to improved drinking water sources, and many households do not treat or safely store their household water supplies.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The prevention package highlights five main elements that require a concerted approach in their implementation. The package includes: a) rotavirus and measles vaccinations, b) promotion of early and exclusive breastfeeding and vitamin A supplementation, c) promotion of handwashing with soap, d) improved water supply quantity and quality, including treatment and safe storage of household water, and e) community-wide sanitation promotion.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Mortality from diarrhoea has declined over the past two decades from an estimated 5 million deaths among children under five to 1.5 million deaths in 2004 </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Africa and South Asia are home to more than 80 per cent of child deaths due to diarrhoea</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Improving sanitation facilities has been associated with an estimated median reduction in diarrhoea incidence of 36 per cent across reviewed studies.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Interventions to improve water quality at the source, along with treatment of household water and safe storage systems, have been shown to reduce diarrhoea incidence by as much as 47 per cent.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Diarrhoea often leads to stunting in children due to its association with poor nutrient absorption and appetite loss.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Breastmilk contains the nutrients, antioxidants, hormones and antibodies needed by a child to survive and develop.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Undernourished children are more likely to suffer from diarrhoea and its consequences, which, in turn, increases their chances of worsening nutritional status. Today, 129 million children under the age of five in the developing world are underweight for their age. Together, Africa and South Asia account for more than 80 per cent of total underweight children (25 per cent and 57 per cent, respectively). About 40 per cent of children under five years of age are stunted in Africa, and nearly half in South Asia.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Only 37 per cent of infants in developing countries are exclusively breastfed for the first six months of life.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Boys and girls are equally likely to receive ORS to treat diarrhoea. Children in urban areas (39 percent) are more likely to receive ORS than those living in rural areas (31 per cent). Similarly, children from the wealthiest families are 1.5 times as likely to receive ORS to treat their diarrhoea as the poorest children</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">**page**<em>&nbsp;</em></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">According to the [inside]World Health Statistics 2009[/inside], please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/World%20Health%20Statistics%202009.pdf" title="World Health Statistics 2009">click here</a> to access:</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp; </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The proportion of under-nourished children under five years of age declined from 27% in 1990 to 20% in 2005. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Some 27% fewer children died before their fifth birthday in 2007 than in 1990. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Maternal mortality has barely changed since 1990. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;One third of 9.7 million people in developing countries who need treatment for HIV/AIDS were receiving it in 2007. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;MDG target for reducing the incidence of tuberculosis was met globally in 2004. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;27 countries reported a reduction of up to 50% in the number of malaria cases between 1990 and 2006. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The number of people with access to safe drinking-water rose from 4.1 billion in 1990 to 5.7 billion in 2006. About 1.1 billion people in developing regions gained access to improved sanitation in the same period. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Globally, the proportion of children under five years of age suffering from under-nutrition, according to WHO Child Growth Standards, declined from 27% in 1990 to 20% in 2005. But, the progress is uneven, and an estimated 112 million children are underweight. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Globally, the number of children who die before their fifth birthday has been reduced by 27% from 12.5 million estimated in 1990 to 9 million in 2007. This reduction is due to a combination of interventions, including the use of insecticide-treated mosquito nets for malaria, oral rehydration therapy for diarrhoea, increased access to vaccines for a number of infectious diseases and improved water and sanitation. But pneumonia and diarrhoea continue to kill 3.8 million children aged under five each year, although both conditions are preventable and treatable.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The global maternal mortality ratio of 400 maternal deaths per 100 000 live births in 2005 has barely changed since 1990. Every year an estimated 536 000 women die in pregnancy or childbirth. Most of these deaths occur in sub-Saharan Africa where the maternal mortality ratio is 900 per 100 000 births and where there has been no measurable improvement since 1990. A woman in Africa may face a 1-in-26 lifetime risk of death during pregnancy and childbirth, compared with only 1 in 7300 in the developed regions. 1 There are, however, signs of progress in some countries in Asia and Latin America and the Caribbean.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The percentage of adults living with HIV worldwide has remained stable since 2000 but there were an estimated 2.7 million new infections during 2007. Moreover, deaths are increasing in parts of Africa, particularly eastern and southern Africa. The use of antiretroviral therapy has increased; in 2007, about 1 million more people living with HIV received the treatment. That means one third of the estimated 9.7 million people in developing countries who need the treatment were receiving it. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The MDG target for reducing the incidence of tuberculosis was met globally in 2004. Since then, incidence has continued to fall slowly. Thanks to early detection of new cases and effective treatment using the WHO-recommended DOTS treatment strategy, treatment success rates have been consistently improving, with rates rising from 79% in 1990 to 85% in 2006. Multi-drug resistant tuberculosis is a challenge in countries, such as those of the former Soviet Union, while the lethal combination of HIV and tuberculosis is an issue particularly for sub-Saharan African countries. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Efforts to control malaria are beginning to pay off with significant increases in the proportion of children sleeping under insecticide-treated mosquito nets. Although it is still too early to register the global impact, 27 countries &ndash; including five in Africa &ndash; have reported a reduction of up to 50% in malaria cases between 1990 and 2006. In 2006, the number of cases was estimated to be 250 million globally. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Progress has been made in treating neglected tropical diseases that affect some 1.2 billion people. For example, only 9585 cases of dracunculiasis (guinea-worm disease) were reported in the five countries where the disease is endemic, compared with an estimated 3.5 million reported in 20 such countries in 1985. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The number of people with access to safe drinking water rose from an estimated 4.1 billion in 1990 to 5.7 billion in 2006. But 900 million people still had to rely on water from what are known as unimproved sources, for example surface water or an unprotected dug well.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Since 1990, an estimated 1.1 billion people in developing regions have gained access to improved sanitation. In 1990, just under 3 billion people had access to sanitation. Their number rose to more than 4 billion by 2006. Yet, in 2006 some 2.5 billion did not have access to improved sanitation and 1.2 billion had to practise open defecation. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Although nearly all developing countries publish an essential medicines list, the availability of medicines at public health facilities is often poor. Surveys in about 30 developing countries show that availability of selected medicines at health facilities was only 35% in the public sector and 63% in the private sector. Lack of medicines in the public sector often means patients have no choice but to purchase them privately or do without treatment. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">According to [inside]National Family Health Survey-III (2005-06)[/inside], </span><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">please <a href="http://rchiips.org/NFHS/nfhs3.shtml" title="http://rchiips.org/NFHS/nfhs3.shtml">click here</a> to access:<br /> <br /> <u><strong>NFHS III reports declining status of nutrition amidst women</strong></u></span><br /> &nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">The NFHS III paints a mixed picture of India&rsquo;s overall reproductive health status. Women are having fewer children and infant mortality has dropped in the seven-year period since the last NFHS survey in 1998-99. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Anaemia and malnutrition are still widespread among children and adults. And, in an unusual juxtaposition, more adults, especially urban women, are overweight or obese than they were seven years ago. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> <span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:medium"><u><strong>Trend in Family Planning and Fertility</strong></u> </span></span><br /> &nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Fertility has continued to decline since NFHS-2, dropping to an average of 2.7 children from 2.9 children. Ten states, mostly in Southern India, have reached replacement level or below replacement level fertility. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">While son preference remains a barrier to more rapid decline in fertility, an increasing number of women who have only daughters say that they want no more children. In NFHS-3, 62% of women with two daughters and no sons say they want no more children, compared with 47% in NFHS-2. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Declining fertility could be attributed largely to women&rsquo;s increased use of contraception. For the first time ever, more than half of currently married women in India are using contraception, and their use of modern contraceptive methods increased from 43% to 49% between NFHS-2 and NFHS-3. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">A rise in the average age at marriage is also contributing to the drop in fertility. Forty-five percent of women ages 20-24 were married before the legal age of marriage of 18 years, compared with 50% seven years earlier. This shift in age at marriage also influences the median age at first birth, which increased by six months to 19.8 years. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> <span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:medium"><u><strong>Half of Women Lack Proper Care during Pregnancy and Delivery</strong></u></span></span><br /> &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;More than three-quarters of pregnant women in India received at least some antenatal care (ANC), but only half of women had at least three ANC visits with a health provider during their pregnancy. </span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull;&nbsp;The disparity between urban and rural women was especially pronounced, with 74% of urban women having ANC at least three times, compared with 43% of rural women. Births assisted by a health professional increased to 49% from 42%, with 75% of urban women but only 39% of rural women in NFHS-3 received assistance from a health professional.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull;&nbsp;Institutional births increased from 34% to 41%, but most women still deliver their children at home. Only about one-third of women received postnatal care within two days of delivery.<br /> <br /> <span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><u><strong>Infant Mortality Drops, but Full Immunization Coverage Shows Little Progress</strong></u></span></span></span></p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Infant mortality continues to decline, dropping from 68 in 1998-99 to 57 in 2005-06 per thousand births. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">There were particularly notable drops in the infant mortality rate in Bihar, Goa, Haryana, Jammu and Kashmir, Meghalaya, Orissa, Punjab, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, and Uttar Pradesh. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Overall, there was only a marginal improvement in full vaccination coverage, with 44% of children ages 12-23 months receiving all recommended vaccinations, up from 42% seven years earlier. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Substantial improvements in coverage have been made in all vaccinations except DPT, which did not change at all between NFHS-2 and NFHS-3. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Gains are particularly evident for polio vaccination coverage, but nearly one-quarter of children age 12-23 months did not receive three recommended doses. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Progress in vaccination coverage varies markedly among the states. In 11 states, there has been a substantial deterioration in full immunization coverage in the last seven years, due to a decline in vaccination coverage for both DPT and polio. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Large decline were seen in Maharashtra, Mizoram, Andhra Pradesh, and Punjab. On the other hand, there was major improvement in full immunization coverage in Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Sikkim, and West Bengal. Other states with marked improvements in full immunization coverage were Assam, Haryana, Jammu and Kashmir, Madhya Pradesh, Meghalaya, and Uttaranchal. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Diarrhoea continues to be a major health problem for many children.&nbsp; Although knowledge about Oral Rehydration Salts (ORS) for the treatment of diarrhoea is widespread among mothers, only 58% of children with diarrhoea were taken to a health facility, down from 65% seven years earlier. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">There has been a rise in the number of dispensaries and hospitals, nursing personnel and doctors (including primary health care centers) in between 1991 and 2005/06, as could be deciphered from the table below.</span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:medium"><u><strong>Trends in health care infrastructure</strong></u> </span></span></p> <div> <table align="justify" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" style="height:96px; width:417px"> <caption> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> </caption> <tbody> <tr> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp;</span></td> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:medium"><strong>1991 </strong></span></span></td> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:medium">&nbsp;<strong>2005/2006</strong></span></span></td> </tr> <tr> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp;SC/PHC/CHC (March 2006)</span></td> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp;57353</span></td> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp;171567</span></td> </tr> <tr> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp;Dispensaries and Hospitals (all) (1.4.2006)</span></td> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp;23555</span></td> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp;32156</span></td> </tr> <tr> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp;Nursing Personnel (2005)</span></td> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp;143887</span></td> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp;1481270</span></td> </tr> <tr> </tr> </tbody> </table> </div> ', 'credit_writer' => '', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 10, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'public-health-51', 'meta_title' => '', 'meta_keywords' => '', 'meta_description' => '', 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 51, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [[maximum depth reached]], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 21, 'metaTitle' => 'Hunger / HDI | Public Health', 'metaKeywords' => '', 'metaDesc' => 'KEY TRENDS&nbsp; &nbsp; &bull; The 2019&nbsp;India&nbsp;TB&nbsp;report&nbsp;says&nbsp;that the&nbsp;country&nbsp;accounted for a quarter of the global tuberculosis (TB) burden with an estimated 27 lakh cases in 2018. In 2018, the country was able to achieve a total notification of 21.5 lakh TB cases, of which...', 'disp' => '<p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">KEY TRENDS&nbsp;</span></p><p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p><div style="text-align:justify">&bull; The 2019&nbsp;India&nbsp;TB&nbsp;report&nbsp;says&nbsp;that the&nbsp;country&nbsp;accounted for a quarter of the global tuberculosis (TB) burden with an estimated 27 lakh cases in 2018. In 2018, the country was able to achieve a total notification of 21.5 lakh TB cases, of which 25 percent was from private sector. Majority of the TB burden is among the working age group. Nearly 89 percent of TB cases came from the age group 15-69 years. About 2/3rd of the TB patients were males <strong>*15</strong></div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify">&bull; Maternal Mortality Ratio for India was 370 in 2000, 286 in 2005, 210 in&nbsp; 2010, 158 in 2015 and 145 in 2017. Therefore, the MMRatio for the country reduced by almost 61 percent between 2000 and 2017. MMRatio for China was 59 in 2000, 44 in 2005, 36 in 2010, 30 in 2015 and 29 in 2017. Therefore, the MMRatio for China fell by around 51 percent between 2000 and 2017 <strong>*14</strong> &nbsp;<br />&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify">&bull; The per capita public expenditure (actual) on health in nominal terms has gone up from Rs. 621 in 2009-10 to Rs. 1,112 in 2015-16. Public expenditure on health (includes health sector expenditure by Centre and States/UTs) as a percentage of GDP was 1.02 percent in 2015-16. There is no significant change in public expenditure on health as a percentage of GDP since 2009-10. The Centre-State share in total public expenditure on health was 31:69 in 2015-16, which used to be 36:64 in 2009-10 <strong>*13</strong><br /><br />&bull; The North-Eastern states had the highest (viz. Rs. 2,878 per capita) and Empowered Action Group (EAG) states (including Assam) had the lowest (viz. Rs. 871 per capita) average per capita public expenditure on health in 2015-16 (excluding UTs). The North-Eastern states had the highest public health expenditure as a percentage of Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP) in 2015-16 (2.76 percent). Public health expenditure as a percentage of GSDP stood at 1.36 percent for EAG states (including Assam) and 0.76 percent for major non-EAG states <strong>*13</strong></div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify">&bull; Of the total disease burden in India in 1990, a tenth was caused by a group of risks including unhealthy diet, high blood pressure, high blood sugar, high cholesterol, and overweight, which mainly contribute to ischaemic heart disease, stroke, and diabetes. The contribution of this group of risks increased massively to a quarter of the total disease burden in India in 2016 <strong>*12</strong><br /><br />&bull; The Out-of-Pocket Expenditure (OOPE) on health by households is Rs. 3,02,425 crores (62.6 percent of total health expenditure, 2.4 percent of GDP, Rs. 2,394 per capita) for the year 2014-15. Private Health Insurance expenditure is Rs. 17,755 crores (3.7 percent of total health expenditure) for the year 2014-15 <strong>*11</strong><br /><br />&bull; Based on available evidence, cardiovascular disease (24 percent), chronic respiratory disease (11 percent), cancer (6 percent) and diabetes (2 percent) are the leading cause of mortality in India <strong>*10</strong><br />&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify">&bull; The total number of dengue cases in India has grown from 28,292 in 2010 to 40,425 in 2014. The total number of dengue related deaths stood at 131 in 2014 <strong>*10</strong></div><div style="text-align:justify"><br />&bull; The Proportion (per 1000) of Ailing Persons (PAP), measured as the number of living persons reporting ailments (per 1000 persons), was 89 persons in rural India and 118 persons in urban India <strong>*9</strong><br />&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify">&bull; Private doctors were the most important single source of non-hospitalized treatment in both the sectors (Rural &amp; Urban). More than 70% (72 per cent in the rural areas and 79 per cent in the urban areas) spells of ailment were treated in the private sector (consisting of private doctors, nursing homes, private hospitals, charitable institutions, etc.) <strong>*9</strong></div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify">&bull; It is observed that in rural India, 42 percent hospitalised treatment was carried out in public hospital and rest 58 percent in private hospital. For the urban India, the corresponding figures were 32 percent and 68 percent. It may be noted in this context that households (or persons within households) were segregated in sector (rural/urban) by their place of domicile, and not by the place of treatment <strong>*9</strong></div><p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p><div style="text-align:justify">&bull; Average medical expenditure per hospitalisation case: Higher amount was spent for treatment per hospitalised case by people in the private hospitals (Rs. 25850) than in the public hospitals (Rs. 6120). The highest expenditure was recorded for treatment of Cancer (Rs. 56712) followed by that for Cardio-vascular diseases (Rs. 31647). Average medical expenditure per non-hospitalisation case was Rs. 509 in rural India and Rs. 639 in urban India <strong>*9</strong><br /><br />&bull; As much as 86 percent of rural population and 82 percent of urban population were still not covered under any scheme of health expenditure support. Government, however, was able to bring about 12 percent urban and 13 percent rural population under health protection coverage through Rastriya Swasthya Bima Yojana (RSBY) or similar plan. Only 12 percent households of the 5th quintile class (Usual Monthly Per Capita Consumer Expenditure) of urban area had some arrangement of medical insurance from private provider <strong>*9</strong></div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify">&bull; The draft National Health Policy 2015 proposes a potentially achievable target of raising public health expenditure to 2.5% of the GDP. It also notes that 40% of this would need to come from Central expenditures. At current prices, a target of 2.5% of GDP translates to Rs. 3800 per capita, representing an almost four fold increase in five years <strong>*8</strong><br />&nbsp;<br />&bull; Maternal mortality ratio (MMR)* in India stood at 560 maternal deaths (per 100000 live births) during 1990, 460 during 1995, 370 during 2000, 280 during 2005 and 190 during 2013. India could reduce MMR by 65 percent between 1990 and 2013<strong> *7</strong><br /><br />&bull; At the country level, the two countries that accounted for one third of all global maternal deaths are India at 17 percent (50000) and Nigeria at 14 percent (40000)<strong> *7</strong><br /><br />&bull; U5MR in India declined by 55 percent from 126 in 1990 to 56 in 2012. Infant Mortality Rate declined from 88 in 1990 to 44 in 2012. Neonatal mortality rate declined from 51 in 1990 to 31 in 2012. U5MR in India among boys declined from 121 in 1990 to 54 in 2012. U5MR in India among girls declined from 130 in 1990 to 59 in 2012. The share of neonatal deaths in under-five deaths stood at 55 percent in 2012 as compared to 41 percent in 1990 <strong>*6</strong><br /><br />&bull; Pneumonia is the leading cause of child mortality in India, responsible for the deaths of nearly 400,000 children under five in 2010 <strong>*5</strong><br /><br />&bull; The Indian Commission on Macroeconomics and Health notes that, in India, 13 household person-days per patient were lost per episode of malaria. Furthermore, the commission estimated that the overall monetary losses to families (income losses together with treatment expenses) could amount to between 200 and 400 Indian rupees (US$ 3.5 to 7) <strong>*4</strong><br /><br />&bull; Odisha is one of the most highly malaria-endemic states in India, accounting for 24% of reported cases in 2010 despite consisting of less of than 4% of the national population. Malaria is particularly common among tribal groups which represent 44% of the population of Orissa <strong>*4</strong><br /><br />&bull; Globally 12% of all deaths among adults aged 30 years and over were attributed to tobacco as compared with 16% in India, 17% in Pakistan and 31% in Bangladesh <strong>*3</strong><br /><br />&bull; A recent study illustrated the economic impact of Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs) in India by estimating that if NCDs like: heart disease, cancer, diabetes, chronic respiratory conditions, and other NCDs were &ldquo;eliminated&rdquo;, the country&rsquo;s 2004 GDP would have been 4 to 10 percent greater<strong> *2</strong><br /><br />&bull; The share of out-of-pocket household health expenditures on NCDs in India increased from 32 percent to 47 percent between 1995&ndash;1996 and 2004. Moreover, 40 percent of these expenditures were financed by borrowing and sales of assets, increasing the household&rsquo;s financial vulnerability<strong> *2</strong><br /><br />&bull; In NFHS-III, 62% of women with two daughters and no sons say they want no more children, compared with 47% in NFHS-II<strong> *1</strong></div><div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>15.</strong> 2019 India TB report, released in 2019, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, please <a href="https://tbcindia.gov.in/WriteReadData/India%20TB%20Report%202019.pdf" title="https://tbcindia.gov.in/WriteReadData/India%20TB%20Report%202019.pdf">click here</a> and <a href="https://tbcindia.gov.in/index1.php?lang=1&amp;level=1&amp;sublinkid=4160&amp;lid=2807" title="https://tbcindia.gov.in/index1.php?lang=1&amp;level=1&amp;sublinkid=4160&amp;lid=2807">click here</a> to access</div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>14.</strong> Trends in Maternal Mortality 2000 to 2017: Estimates by World Health Orgnization (WHO), United Nations Children&#39;s Fund (UNICEF), World Bank Group, United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) and the United Nations Population Division (released in September 2019), please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Maternal%20mortality%20Levels%20and%20trends%202000%20to%202017%20Executive%20Summary.pdf" title="Maternal mortality Levels and trends 2000 to 2017 Executive Summary" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Maternal%20mortality%20Levels%20and%20trends%202000%20to%202017%20Executive%20Summary.pdf" title="Maternal mortality Levels and trends 2000 to 2017 Executive Summary">click here</a> and <a href="https://www.unfpa.org/featured-publication/trends-maternal-mortality-2000-2017" title="https://www.unfpa.org/featured-publication/trends-maternal-mortality-2000-2017">click here</a> to access</div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>13</strong>. National Health Profile 2018, 13th Issue, Central Bureau of Health Intelligence, Ministry of Health &amp; Family Welfare, please <a href="https://im4change.org/docs/900National%20Health%20Profile%202018%2013th%20Issue%20Central%20Bureau%20of%20Health%20Intelligence%20Ministry%20of%20Health%20&amp;%20Family%20Welfare.pdf" title="https://im4change.org/docs/900National%20Health%20Profile%202018%2013th%20Issue%20Central%20Bureau%20of%20Health%20Intelligence%20Ministry%20of%20Health%20&amp;%20Family%20Welfare.pdf">click here</a> to access&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>12. </strong>India: Health of the Nation&rsquo;s States - The India State-Level Disease Burden Initiative, Disease Burden Trends in the States of India 1990 to 2016 (released in October, 2017), prepared by Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), Public Health Foundation of India (PHFI), Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) and Ministry of Health &amp; Family Welfare (MoHFW), please <a href="https://im4change.org/docs/11592India_Health_of.pdf" title="https://im4change.org/docs/11592India_Health_of.pdf">click here</a> to access</div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>11</strong>. National Health Accounts: Estimates for India 2014-15 (released in October, 2017), prepared by the National Health Accounts Technical Secretariat, National Health Systems Resource Centre and Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/National%20Health%20Accounts%20Estimates%20Report%202014-15.pdf" title="National Health Accounts Estimates for India 2014-15" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/National%20Health%20Accounts%20Estimates%20Report%202014-15.pdf" title="National Health Accounts Estimates for India 2014-15">click here</a> to access</div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>10</strong>. National Health Profile 2015, Central Bureau of Health Intelligence, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (please <a href="http://www.cbhidghs.nic.in/E-Book%20HTML-2015/index.html" title="http://www.cbhidghs.nic.in/E-Book%20HTML-2015/index.html">click here</a> to access)</div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>9</strong>. 71st round NSS report: Key Indicators of Social Consumption in India-Health (published in June 2015), please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/nss_71st_ki_health_30june15.pdf" title="NSS 71st Round Health" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/nss_71st_ki_health_30june15.pdf" title="NSS 71st Round Health">click here</a> to access the full report; please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/NSS%20Press%20Release%20Health.pdf" title="NSS Press Note Health" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/NSS%20Press%20Release%20Health.pdf" title="NSS Press Note Health">click here</a> to read the summary of findings</div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>8</strong>. Draft National Health Policy 2015 (published in December 2014), Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (Please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Draft%20National%20Health%20Policy%202015.pdf" title="Draft NHP 2015" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Draft%20National%20Health%20Policy%202015.pdf" title="Draft NHP 2015">click here</a> to download)</div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>7</strong>. United Nations&#39; report (released in May, 2014) entitled Trends in maternal mortality estimates 1990 to 2013,&nbsp;</span>(please&nbsp;<a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Trends%20in%20Maternal%20Mortality%201990%20to%202013.pdf" title="Trends in Maternal Mortality 1990 to 2013" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Trends%20in%20Maternal%20Mortality%201990%20to%202013.pdf" title="Trends in Maternal Mortality 1990 to 2013">click here</a>&nbsp;to download)</div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><strong>6. </strong><a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/APR_Progress_Report_2013_9_Sept_2013_1.pdf" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/APR_Progress_Report_2013_9_Sept_2013_1.pdf">Committing to Child Survival</a>: A Promise Renewed Progress Report 2013, UNICEF </span></span></p></div><p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>5</strong>. Pneumonia Progress Report, 2012, released by IVAC and John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012.pdf" title="Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012.pdf" title="Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012">click here</a> to access</span></p><p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p><div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>4</strong>. Defeating malaria in Asia, the Pacific, Americas, Middle East and Europe (2012), World Health Organization and PATH,&nbsp;</span></div><p style="text-align:justify"><a href="http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Defeating%20malaria.pdf" title="http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Defeating%20malaria.pdf">http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Defeat<br />ing%20malaria.pdf</a></p><p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>3</strong>. WHO Global Report: Mortality Attributable to Tobacco (2012), please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/WHO%20report%20on%20Tobacco.pdf" title="WHO " title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/WHO%20report%20on%20Tobacco.pdf" title="WHO ">click here</a> to access&nbsp;&nbsp;</span></p><p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>2</strong>. The Growing Danger of Non-Communicable Diseases: Acting Now to Reverse Course, September, 2011, The World Bank, please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/WBDeepeningCrisis.pdf" title="WBDeepeningCrisis" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/WBDeepeningCrisis.pdf" title="WBDeepeningCrisis">click here</a> to access</span></p><p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>1</strong>. National Family Health Survey III (2005-06), please <a href="http://rchiips.org/NFHS/nfhs3.shtml" title="http://rchiips.org/NFHS/nfhs3.shtml">click here</a> to access &nbsp;</span></p><p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:justify">', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 21, 'title' => 'Public Health', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">KEY TRENDS&nbsp;</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <div style="text-align:justify">&bull; The 2019&nbsp;India&nbsp;TB&nbsp;report&nbsp;says&nbsp;that the&nbsp;country&nbsp;accounted for a quarter of the global tuberculosis (TB) burden with an estimated 27 lakh cases in 2018. In 2018, the country was able to achieve a total notification of 21.5 lakh TB cases, of which 25 percent was from private sector. Majority of the TB burden is among the working age group. Nearly 89 percent of TB cases came from the age group 15-69 years. About 2/3rd of the TB patients were males <strong>*15</strong></div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&bull; Maternal Mortality Ratio for India was 370 in 2000, 286 in 2005, 210 in&nbsp; 2010, 158 in 2015 and 145 in 2017. Therefore, the MMRatio for the country reduced by almost 61 percent between 2000 and 2017. MMRatio for China was 59 in 2000, 44 in 2005, 36 in 2010, 30 in 2015 and 29 in 2017. Therefore, the MMRatio for China fell by around 51 percent between 2000 and 2017 <strong>*14</strong> &nbsp;<br /> &nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&bull; The per capita public expenditure (actual) on health in nominal terms has gone up from Rs. 621 in 2009-10 to Rs. 1,112 in 2015-16. Public expenditure on health (includes health sector expenditure by Centre and States/UTs) as a percentage of GDP was 1.02 percent in 2015-16. There is no significant change in public expenditure on health as a percentage of GDP since 2009-10. The Centre-State share in total public expenditure on health was 31:69 in 2015-16, which used to be 36:64 in 2009-10 <strong>*13</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; The North-Eastern states had the highest (viz. Rs. 2,878 per capita) and Empowered Action Group (EAG) states (including Assam) had the lowest (viz. Rs. 871 per capita) average per capita public expenditure on health in 2015-16 (excluding UTs). The North-Eastern states had the highest public health expenditure as a percentage of Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP) in 2015-16 (2.76 percent). Public health expenditure as a percentage of GSDP stood at 1.36 percent for EAG states (including Assam) and 0.76 percent for major non-EAG states <strong>*13</strong></div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&bull; Of the total disease burden in India in 1990, a tenth was caused by a group of risks including unhealthy diet, high blood pressure, high blood sugar, high cholesterol, and overweight, which mainly contribute to ischaemic heart disease, stroke, and diabetes. The contribution of this group of risks increased massively to a quarter of the total disease burden in India in 2016 <strong>*12</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; The Out-of-Pocket Expenditure (OOPE) on health by households is Rs. 3,02,425 crores (62.6 percent of total health expenditure, 2.4 percent of GDP, Rs. 2,394 per capita) for the year 2014-15. Private Health Insurance expenditure is Rs. 17,755 crores (3.7 percent of total health expenditure) for the year 2014-15 <strong>*11</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; Based on available evidence, cardiovascular disease (24 percent), chronic respiratory disease (11 percent), cancer (6 percent) and diabetes (2 percent) are the leading cause of mortality in India <strong>*10</strong><br /> &nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&bull; The total number of dengue cases in India has grown from 28,292 in 2010 to 40,425 in 2014. The total number of dengue related deaths stood at 131 in 2014 <strong>*10</strong></div> <div style="text-align:justify"><br /> &bull; The Proportion (per 1000) of Ailing Persons (PAP), measured as the number of living persons reporting ailments (per 1000 persons), was 89 persons in rural India and 118 persons in urban India <strong>*9</strong><br /> &nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&bull; Private doctors were the most important single source of non-hospitalized treatment in both the sectors (Rural &amp; Urban). More than 70% (72 per cent in the rural areas and 79 per cent in the urban areas) spells of ailment were treated in the private sector (consisting of private doctors, nursing homes, private hospitals, charitable institutions, etc.) <strong>*9</strong></div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&bull; It is observed that in rural India, 42 percent hospitalised treatment was carried out in public hospital and rest 58 percent in private hospital. For the urban India, the corresponding figures were 32 percent and 68 percent. It may be noted in this context that households (or persons within households) were segregated in sector (rural/urban) by their place of domicile, and not by the place of treatment <strong>*9</strong></div> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <div style="text-align:justify">&bull; Average medical expenditure per hospitalisation case: Higher amount was spent for treatment per hospitalised case by people in the private hospitals (Rs. 25850) than in the public hospitals (Rs. 6120). The highest expenditure was recorded for treatment of Cancer (Rs. 56712) followed by that for Cardio-vascular diseases (Rs. 31647). Average medical expenditure per non-hospitalisation case was Rs. 509 in rural India and Rs. 639 in urban India <strong>*9</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; As much as 86 percent of rural population and 82 percent of urban population were still not covered under any scheme of health expenditure support. Government, however, was able to bring about 12 percent urban and 13 percent rural population under health protection coverage through Rastriya Swasthya Bima Yojana (RSBY) or similar plan. Only 12 percent households of the 5th quintile class (Usual Monthly Per Capita Consumer Expenditure) of urban area had some arrangement of medical insurance from private provider <strong>*9</strong></div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&bull; The draft National Health Policy 2015 proposes a potentially achievable target of raising public health expenditure to 2.5% of the GDP. It also notes that 40% of this would need to come from Central expenditures. At current prices, a target of 2.5% of GDP translates to Rs. 3800 per capita, representing an almost four fold increase in five years <strong>*8</strong><br /> &nbsp;<br /> &bull; Maternal mortality ratio (MMR)* in India stood at 560 maternal deaths (per 100000 live births) during 1990, 460 during 1995, 370 during 2000, 280 during 2005 and 190 during 2013. India could reduce MMR by 65 percent between 1990 and 2013<strong> *7</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; At the country level, the two countries that accounted for one third of all global maternal deaths are India at 17 percent (50000) and Nigeria at 14 percent (40000)<strong> *7</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; U5MR in India declined by 55 percent from 126 in 1990 to 56 in 2012. Infant Mortality Rate declined from 88 in 1990 to 44 in 2012. Neonatal mortality rate declined from 51 in 1990 to 31 in 2012. U5MR in India among boys declined from 121 in 1990 to 54 in 2012. U5MR in India among girls declined from 130 in 1990 to 59 in 2012. The share of neonatal deaths in under-five deaths stood at 55 percent in 2012 as compared to 41 percent in 1990 <strong>*6</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; Pneumonia is the leading cause of child mortality in India, responsible for the deaths of nearly 400,000 children under five in 2010 <strong>*5</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; The Indian Commission on Macroeconomics and Health notes that, in India, 13 household person-days per patient were lost per episode of malaria. Furthermore, the commission estimated that the overall monetary losses to families (income losses together with treatment expenses) could amount to between 200 and 400 Indian rupees (US$ 3.5 to 7) <strong>*4</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; Odisha is one of the most highly malaria-endemic states in India, accounting for 24% of reported cases in 2010 despite consisting of less of than 4% of the national population. Malaria is particularly common among tribal groups which represent 44% of the population of Orissa <strong>*4</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; Globally 12% of all deaths among adults aged 30 years and over were attributed to tobacco as compared with 16% in India, 17% in Pakistan and 31% in Bangladesh <strong>*3</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; A recent study illustrated the economic impact of Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs) in India by estimating that if NCDs like: heart disease, cancer, diabetes, chronic respiratory conditions, and other NCDs were &ldquo;eliminated&rdquo;, the country&rsquo;s 2004 GDP would have been 4 to 10 percent greater<strong> *2</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; The share of out-of-pocket household health expenditures on NCDs in India increased from 32 percent to 47 percent between 1995&ndash;1996 and 2004. Moreover, 40 percent of these expenditures were financed by borrowing and sales of assets, increasing the household&rsquo;s financial vulnerability<strong> *2</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; In NFHS-III, 62% of women with two daughters and no sons say they want no more children, compared with 47% in NFHS-II<strong> *1</strong></div> <div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify"><strong>15.</strong> 2019 India TB report, released in 2019, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, please <a href="https://tbcindia.gov.in/WriteReadData/India%20TB%20Report%202019.pdf">click here</a> and <a href="https://tbcindia.gov.in/index1.php?lang=1&amp;level=1&amp;sublinkid=4160&amp;lid=2807">click here</a> to access</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify"><strong>14.</strong> Trends in Maternal Mortality 2000 to 2017: Estimates by World Health Orgnization (WHO), United Nations Children&#39;s Fund (UNICEF), World Bank Group, United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) and the United Nations Population Division (released in September 2019), please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Maternal%20mortality%20Levels%20and%20trends%202000%20to%202017%20Executive%20Summary.pdf" title="Maternal mortality Levels and trends 2000 to 2017 Executive Summary">click here</a> and <a href="https://www.unfpa.org/featured-publication/trends-maternal-mortality-2000-2017">click here</a> to access</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify"><strong>13</strong>. National Health Profile 2018, 13th Issue, Central Bureau of Health Intelligence, Ministry of Health &amp; Family Welfare, please <a href="https://im4change.org/docs/900National%20Health%20Profile%202018%2013th%20Issue%20Central%20Bureau%20of%20Health%20Intelligence%20Ministry%20of%20Health%20&amp;%20Family%20Welfare.pdf">click here</a> to access&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify"><strong>12. </strong>India: Health of the Nation&rsquo;s States - The India State-Level Disease Burden Initiative, Disease Burden Trends in the States of India 1990 to 2016 (released in October, 2017), prepared by Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), Public Health Foundation of India (PHFI), Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) and Ministry of Health &amp; Family Welfare (MoHFW), please <a href="https://im4change.org/docs/11592India_Health_of.pdf">click here</a> to access</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify"><strong>11</strong>. National Health Accounts: Estimates for India 2014-15 (released in October, 2017), prepared by the National Health Accounts Technical Secretariat, National Health Systems Resource Centre and Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/National%20Health%20Accounts%20Estimates%20Report%202014-15.pdf" title="National Health Accounts Estimates for India 2014-15">click here</a> to access</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify"><strong>10</strong>. National Health Profile 2015, Central Bureau of Health Intelligence, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (please <a href="http://www.cbhidghs.nic.in/E-Book%20HTML-2015/index.html">click here</a> to access)</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify"><strong>9</strong>. 71st round NSS report: Key Indicators of Social Consumption in India-Health (published in June 2015), please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/nss_71st_ki_health_30june15.pdf" title="NSS 71st Round Health">click here</a> to access the full report; please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/NSS%20Press%20Release%20Health.pdf" title="NSS Press Note Health">click here</a> to read the summary of findings</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify"><strong>8</strong>. Draft National Health Policy 2015 (published in December 2014), Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (Please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Draft%20National%20Health%20Policy%202015.pdf" title="Draft NHP 2015">click here</a> to download)</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>7</strong>. United Nations&#39; report (released in May, 2014) entitled Trends in maternal mortality estimates 1990 to 2013,&nbsp;</span>(please&nbsp;<a href="tinymce/uploaded/Trends%20in%20Maternal%20Mortality%201990%20to%202013.pdf" title="Trends in Maternal Mortality 1990 to 2013">click here</a>&nbsp;to download)</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><strong>6. </strong><a href="tinymce/uploaded/APR_Progress_Report_2013_9_Sept_2013_1.pdf">Committing to Child Survival</a>: A Promise Renewed Progress Report 2013, UNICEF </span></span></p> </div> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>5</strong>. Pneumonia Progress Report, 2012, released by IVAC and John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012.pdf" title="Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012">click here</a> to access</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>4</strong>. Defeating malaria in Asia, the Pacific, Americas, Middle East and Europe (2012), World Health Organization and PATH,&nbsp;</span></div> <p style="text-align:justify"><a href="http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Defeating%20malaria.pdf">http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Defeating%20malaria.pdf</a></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>3</strong>. WHO Global Report: Mortality Attributable to Tobacco (2012), please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/WHO%20report%20on%20Tobacco.pdf" title="WHO ">click here</a> to access&nbsp;&nbsp;</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>2</strong>. The Growing Danger of Non-Communicable Diseases: Acting Now to Reverse Course, September, 2011, The World Bank, please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/WBDeepeningCrisis.pdf" title="WBDeepeningCrisis">click here</a> to access</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>1</strong>. National Family Health Survey III (2005-06), please <a href="http://rchiips.org/NFHS/nfhs3.shtml">click here</a> to access &nbsp;</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The key findings of the [inside]Global Tuberculosis Report 2022 (released in October 2022)[/inside] by World Health Organization are as follows (please click <a href="/upload/files/Global%20Tuberculosis%20Report%202022.pdf">here</a> and <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022">here</a> to access):&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>India-specific findings</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The case notifications of people newly diagnosed with TB in India were 16,67,136 in 2015, 17,63,876 in 2016, 16,49,694 in 2017, 19,08,683 in 2018, 21,62,323 in 2019, 16,29,301 in 2020, and 19,65,444 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/covid-19-and-tb">click here</a> to access the data. &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Between 2019 and 2020, India witnessed a reduction of 24.65 percent in case notifications of people newly diagnosed with TB. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/covid-19-and-tb ">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Between 2019 and 2021, India faced a reduction of 9.1 percent in case notifications of people newly diagnosed with TB. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/covid-19-and-tb ">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Almost all (90 percent) of the global drop in the number of people newly diagnosed with TB and reported (notified) between 2019 and 2020 was accounted for by 10 countries; the top three, India, Indonesia and the Philippines, accounted for 67 percent. In 2021, 90 percent of the reduction compared with 2019 was accounted for by only five countries. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/covid-19-and-tb ">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Among the 30 high TB burden and 3 global TB watchlist countries, the largest relative reductions in annual notifications between 2019 and 2020 were (ordered according to the size of the relative reduction) in Philippines, Lesotho, Indonesia, Zimbabwe, India, Myanmar and Bangladesh (all &gt;20 percent). In 2021, there was considerable recovery in India, Indonesia and the Philippines, although not to 2019 levels. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/covid-19-and-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2021, eight countries accounted for more than two thirds of global TB cases: India (28 percent), Indonesia (9.2 percent), China (7.4 percent), the Philippines (7.0 percent), Pakistan (5.8 percent), Nigeria (4.4 percent), Bangladesh (3.6 percent) and Democratic Republic of the Congo (2.9 percent). Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-1-tb-incidence">click here</a> to access data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Trends in the TB incidence rate in the 30 high TB burden countries are mixed. Between 2020 and 2021, there were estimated increases in countries with major shortfalls in TB notifications in 2020 and 2021 (e.g. India, Indonesia, Myanmar, Philippines), while in others the previous decline in the TB incidence rate has slowed or stabilized. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-1-tb-incidence">click here</a> to access data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; TB incidence rates for India were 341 per lakh population in 2000, 340 per lakh population in 2001, 339 per lakh population in 2002, 337 per lakh population in 2003, 334 per lakh population in 2004, 329 per lakh population in 2005, 323 per lakh population in 2006, 316 per lakh population in 2007, 309 per lakh population in 2008, 300 per lakh population in 2009, 292 per lakh population in 2010, 284 per lakh population in 2011, 277 per lakh population in 2012, 270 per lakh population in 2013, 263 per lakh population in 2014, 256 per lakh population in 2015, 249 per lakh population in 2016, 234 per lakh population in 2017, 224 per lakh population in 2018, 214 per lakh population in 2019, 204 per lakh population in 2020, and 210 per lakh population in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-1-tb-incidence">click here</a> to access data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; TB case notification rates (of new and relapse cases) for India were 105 per lakh population in 2000, 101 per lakh population in 2001, 97 per lakh population in 2002, 96 per lakh population in 2003, 100 per lakh population in 2004, 100 per lakh population in 2005, 105 per lakh population in 2006, 109 per lakh population in 2007, 110 per lakh population in 2008, 110 per lakh population in 2009, 108 per lakh population in 2010, 105 per lakh population in 2011, 101 per lakh population in 2012, 96 per lakh population in 2013, 123 per lakh population in 2014, 126 per lakh population in 2015, 132 per lakh population in 2016, 122 per lakh population in 2017, 139 per lakh population in 2018, 156 per lakh population in 2019, 117 per lakh population in 2020, and 140 per lakh population in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-1-tb-incidence">click here</a> to access data. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2021, 82 percent of global TB deaths among HIV-negative people occurred in the WHO African and South-East Asia regions; India alone accounted for 36 percent. The African and South-East Asia regions accounted for 82 percent of the combined total of TB deaths in HIV-negative and HIV-positive people; India accounted for 32 percent. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-2-tb-mortality">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Trends in the number of TB deaths in the 30 high TB burden countries are mixed. Between 2019 and 2021, striking increases are estimated to have occurred in countries with major shortfalls in TB notifications in 2020 and 2021 (e.g. India, Indonesia, Myanmar, Philippines), while in others previous declines have slowed or stabilized. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-2-tb-mortality">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The estimated absolute numbers of TB deaths (HIV-positive and HIV-negative) in India were 7,10,000 in 2000, 7,00,000 in 2001, 6,90,000 in 2002, 6,70,000 in 2003, 6,50,000 in 2004, 6,40,000 in 2005, 6,30,000 in 2006, 6,30,000 in 2007, 5,90,000 in 2008, 5,80,000 in 2009, 5,50,000 in 2010, 5,40,000 in 2011, 5,30,000 in 2012, 5,20,000 in 2013, 4,90,000 in 2014, 4,70,000 in 2015, 4,60,000 in 2016, 4,60,000 in 2017, 4,60,000 in 2018, 4,50,000 in 2019, 4,80,000 in 2020, and 5,10,000 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-2-tb-mortality">click here</a> to access the data.<br /> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<br /> &bull; The estimated numbers of incident cases of Multidrug- and rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/RR-TB) were 1,49,000 in 2015, 1,44,000 in 2016, 1,35,000 in 2017, 129,000 in 2018, 123,000 in 2019, 1,17,000 in 2020, and 1,19,000 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-3-drug-resistant-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The countries with the largest share of incident cases of MDR/RR-TB in 2021 were India (26 percent of global cases), the Russian Federation (8.5 percent of global cases) and Pakistan (7.9 percent of global cases). Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-3-drug-resistant-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2019&ndash;2021, the first-ever national survey was completed in India; this was one of the largest surveys to date, with a sample size of about 3,20,000 people. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2.4-tb-prevalence-surveys">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2020, the first full year of the COVID-19 pandemic, there were particularly large absolute and relative reductions in India, Indonesia and Philippines, followed by some recovery in 2021.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The number&nbsp;of notifications of people newly diagnosed with TB (new and relapse cases, all forms) was 11,15,718 in 2000, 10,85,075 in 2001, 10,60,951 in 2002, 10,73,282 in 2003, 11,36,182 in 2004, 11,56,248 in 2005, 12,28,827 in 2006, 12,95,943 in 2007, 13,32,267 in 2008, 13,51,913 in 2009, 13,39,866 in 2010, 13,23,949 in 2011, 12,89,836 in 2012, 12,43,905 in 2013, 16,09,547 in 2014, 16,67,136 in 2015, 17,63,876 in 2016, 16,49,694 in 2017, 19,08,683 in 2018, 21,62,323 in 2019, 16,29,301 in 2020, and 19,65,444 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-1-case-notifications ">click here</a> to access the data. &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The number of estimated TB incident cases in India was 36,10,000 in 2000, 36,70,000 in 2001, 37,20,000 in 2002, 37,60,000 in 2003, 37,90,000 in 2004, 38,00,000 in 2005, 37,90,000 in 2006, 37,60,000 in 2007, 37,20,000 in 2008, 36,80,000 in 2009, 36,30,000 in 2010, 35,70,000 in 2011, 35,30,000 in 2012, 34,80,000 in 2013, 34,40,000 in 2014, 33,90,000 in 2015, 33,30,000 in 2016, 31,60,000 in 2017, 30,60,000 in 2018, 29,60,000 in 2019, 28,50,000 in 2020, and 29,50,000 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-1-case-notifications ">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The contribution of public-private mix (PPM) initiatives to total notifications was 2.3 percent in 2010, 0.26 percent in 2011, 0.24 percent in 2012, 6.0 percent in 2013, 12.0 percent in 2014, 11.0 percent in 2015, 17.0 percent in 2016, 23.0 percent in 2017, 26.0 percent in 2018, 28.0 percent in 2019, 31.0 percent in 2020, and 33.0 percent in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-1-case-notifications ">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The percentage of people in India newly diagnosed with pulmonary TB who were bacteriologically confirmed was 35 percent in 2000, 41 percent in 2001, 44 percent in 2002, 49 percent in 2003, 53 percent in 2004, 56 percent in 2005, 58 percent in 2006, 60 percent in 2007, 61 percent in 2008, 62 percent in 2009, 63 percent in 2010, 65 percent in 2011, 66 percent in 2012, 71 percent in 2013, 66 percent in 2014, 64 percent in 2015, 63 percent in 2016, 71 percent in 2017, 57 percent in 2018, 57 percent in 2019, 54 percent in 2020, and 66 percent in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-2-diagnostic-testing-for-tb--hiv-associated-tb-and-drug-resistant-tb">click here</a> to access the data</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The number of WHO-recommended rapid tests used per 1,00,000 population in the case of India was 258 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-2-diagnostic-testing-for-tb--hiv-associated-tb-and-drug-resistant-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The percentage of people in India initially tested for TB with a WHO-recommended rapid test who had a positive test was 24 percent in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-2-diagnostic-testing-for-tb--hiv-associated-tb-and-drug-resistant-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The number of WHO-recommended rapid diagnostic tests per person notified as a TB case (new and relapse cases, all forms) in India was 1.8 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-2-diagnostic-testing-for-tb--hiv-associated-tb-and-drug-resistant-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The estimated TB treatment coverage for India was 67 percent in 2021. The estimated TB treatment coverage among children aged 0&ndash;14 years for India was 32 percent in 2021. The estimated TB treatment coverage among children aged &gt;= 15 years for India was 71 percent in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-3-tb-treatment-and-treatment-coverage">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2021, ten countries accounted for 75 percent of the global gap between the estimated number of people who developed TB (incident TB cases) and the number of people who were detected with TB and officially reported. About 60 percent of the global gap was accounted for by five countries: India (24 percent), Indonesia (13 percent), the Philippines (10 percent), Pakistan (6.6 percent) and Nigeria (6.3 percent). Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-3-tb-treatment-and-treatment-coverage">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The estimated coverage of antiretroviral therapy for people living with HIV who developed TB for India 59 percent in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-3-tb-treatment-and-treatment-coverage">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The number of Indian people diagnosed with MDR/RR-TB was 3,288 in 2010, 4,297 in 2011, 17,253 in 2012, 18,888 in 2013, 25,748 in 2014, 28,876 in 2015, 37,258 in 2016, 39,009 in 2017, 58,347 in 2018, 66,255 in 2019, 49,679 in 2020, and 58,837 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-4-drug-resistant-tb-treatment">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The number of Indian people enrolled on MDR/RR-TB was 2,182 in 2010, 3,378 in 2011, 14,117 in 2012, 21,093 in 2013, 24,073 in 2014, 26,966 in 2015, 32,914 in 2016, 35,950 in 2017, 47,284 in 2018, 60,858 in 2019, 42,505 in 2020, and 53,037 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-4-drug-resistant-tb-treatment">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The number of Indian people enrolled on MDR/RR-TB was 2,182 in 2010, 3,378 in 2011, 14,117 in 2012, 21,093 in 2013, 24,073 in 2014, 26,966 in 2015, 32,914 in 2016, 35,950 in 2017, 47,284 in 2018, 60,858 in 2019, 42,505 in 2020, and 53,037 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-4-drug-resistant-tb-treatment">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The WHO regions with the best treatment coverage are the European Region and the Region of the Americas. Among the 30 high MDR/RR-TB burden countries, those with the best treatment coverage are 2021: Peru, the Russian Federation, Azerbaijan, the Republic of Moldova, India and Kazakhstan. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-4-drug-resistant-tb-treatment">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The estimated treatment coverage for MDR/RR-TB for India was 45 percent in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-4-drug-resistant-tb-treatment">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Seven countries (India, Nigeria, South Africa, Uganda, United Republic of Tanzania, Zambia and Zimbabwe) each reported initiating over 200 000 people with HIV on TB preventive treatment in 2021, accounting collectively for 82 percent of the 2.8 million reported globally. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-prevention">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Since 2014, spending on the diagnosis and treatment of drug-susceptible TB has fallen slightly. Spending on treatment of multidrug and rifampicin-resistant TB (MDR/RR-TB) has increased steadily since 2010: this growth is largely explained by trends in the BRICS group of countries (i.e., Brazil, Russian Federation, India, China and South Africa). Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/financing-for-tb">click here</a> to access the data. &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Bangladesh, Cambodia, China and Zambia are examples of high TB burden countries that have steadily increased domestic funding specifically allocated to NTPs (as opposed to funding allocated more generally for inpatient and outpatient care, including for people with TB) in recent years. There was a considerable reduction in domestic spending in India between 2020 and 2021; one explanation for this was less need for spending on second-line anti-TB drugs in 2021, given stocks that still existed from 2020. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/financing-for-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The international funding (at constant 2021 US$) for national TB programmes on TB prevention, diagnostic and treatment services was 37 million in 2010, 65 million in 2011, 61 million in 2012, 143 million in 2013, 92 million in 2014, 142 million in 2015, 135 million in 2016, 187 million in 2017, 170 million in 2018, 91 million in 2019, 85 million in 2020, and 154 million in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/financing-for-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The domestic funding (at constant 2021 US$) for national TB programmes on TB prevention, diagnostic and treatment services was 56 million in 2010, 60 million in 2011, 44 million in 2012, 85 million in 2013, 162 million in 2014, 132 million in 2015, 139 million in 2016, 305 million in 2017, 348 million in 2018, 365 million in 2019, 326 million in 2020, and 183 million in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/financing-for-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In the case of India, the sources of funding and funding gaps reported for the TB-specific budgets included in national strategic plans for TB were domestic funding: 66 percent, Global Fund: 29 percent, and international funding (excluding Global Fund): 4.9 percent in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/financing-for-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The distribution of the two UHC indicators in the 30 high TB burden countries and three global TB watchlist countries shows that, in general, values improve with income level; this is especially evident for the SCI. Nonetheless, the risk of catastrophic health expenditures is high (15 or above) in several middle-income countries, including Angola, Bangladesh, Cambodia, China, India, and Nigeria. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/uhc-tb-determinants/6.1-universal-health-coverage">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; To achieve Universal Health Coverage (UHC), substantial increases in investment in health are critical. From 2000 to 2019 there was a striking increase in health expenditure (from all sources) per capita in a few high TB burden countries, especially the upper-middle-income countries of Brazil, China, South Africa and Thailand. A steady upward trend was evident in Bangladesh, Ethiopia, India, Indonesia, Lesotho, Mongolia, Mozambique, the Philippines and Viet Nam, and there was a noticeable rise from 2012 to 2017 in Myanmar. Elsewhere, however, levels of spending have been relatively stable, and at generally much lower levels. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/uhc-tb-determinants/6.1-universal-health-coverage">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The current health expenditures per capita were US$ 86 in 2000, US$ 96 in 2001, US$ 99 in 2002, US$ 101 in 2003, US$ 109 in 2004, US$ 114 in 2005, US$ 119 in 2006, US$ 126 in 2007, US$ 131 in 2008, US$ 139 in 2009, US$ 141 in 2010, US$ 146 in 2011, US$ 162 in 2012, US$ 190 in 2013, US$ 189 in 2014, US$ 197 in 2015, US$ 205 in 2016, US$ 182 in 2017, US$ 196 in 2018, and US$ 211 in 2019.&nbsp;Kindly <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/uhc-tb-determinants/6.1-universal-health-coverage">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The estimated number of TB cases attributable to alcohol use disorders was 2,58,000, diabetes was 1,05,000, HIV was 93,000, smoking was 1,10,000 and undernourishment was 7,38,000 in 2021. Kindly <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/uhc-tb-determinants/6-3-tb-determinants">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Based on the latest available data in the World Bank database, some upper-middle-income and lower-middle-income countries (e.g. Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, Mongolia, South Africa, Thailand, and Viet Nam) appear to be performing relatively well. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/uhc-tb-determinants/6-3-tb-determinants">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Three new antigen-based skin tests for TB infection that perform better than tuberculin skin tests (particularly in terms of specificity) were evaluated and recommended by WHO in 2022; these are the Cy-Tb skin test, Serum Institute of India, India; C-TST, Anhui Zhifei Longcom Biopharmaceutical Co. Ltd, China; and Diaskintest, JSC Generium, Russian Federation. WHO plans to evaluate the following tests in the coming year: culture-free, targeted-sequencing solutions to test for drug resistance directly from sputum specimens; broth microdilution methods for drug-susceptibility testing (DST); and new IGRAs to test for TB infection. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-research-and-innovation">click here</a> to access the information.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In India, the Ministry of Health &amp; Family Welfare launched the 21-day TB Mukt Bharat Campaign at Ayushman Bharat Health and Wellness Centres (AB-HWCs), from 24 March to 14 April 2022. The campaign aimed to meaningfully engage community and civil society to build a people&rsquo;s movement to end TB. It was celebrated across 75 228 AB-HWCs; a total of 6 801 956 people were screened for TB, and 38 328 community awareness activities took place using 21 479 trained TB champions. Linked to this initiative, primary health care teams led by the newly introduced cadre of community health officers (CHOs) provide people-centred TB services to people&rsquo;s doorsteps. AB-HWCs are playing an important role in improving awareness, identifying TB symptoms at an early stage, offering treatment adherence and psychosocial support to individuals and families with TB, and creating a strong network of TB survivors to strengthen the TB response. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/featured-topics/civil-society-engagement">click here</a> to access the more information.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; WHO has been advancing MAF-TB efforts to strengthen the engagement of the private sector and other public care providers not linked to national TB programmes (NTPs) through a new initiative with the Bill &amp; Melinda Gates Foundation. The initiative promotes the development of enhanced PPM data dashboards in seven priority countries: Bangladesh, India, Indonesia, Kenya, Nigeria, Pakistan and the Philippines. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/featured-topics/maf-tb">click here</a> to get more information.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; India has developed a national multisectoral action framework for TB; this strategic document makes a strong case for transforming India&rsquo;s TB elimination efforts from a health sector struggle to a whole-of-society responsibility. The framework is a guide for policy-makers and a call to action for communities, civil society, the private sector, and other partners and stakeholders. The overarching goal is to strengthen the country&rsquo;s capacity for a multisectoral response that facilitates TB elimination by 2025, with the key objective being to achieve policy convergence and adopt a health-in-all approach. The framework highlights the six key strategic areas for integrated action: integrated health care service delivery; TB-free workplaces; socioeconomic support for patients; awareness generation and infection control; corporate social responsibility and investment in TB; and targeted intervention for key affected populations. It defines the list of government ministries and other stakeholders, and the strategic scope of collaboration with each of them. Also, the framework acknowledges the importance of resources for defined strategic areas (e.g. financing, capacity-building, technical resources and research), and calls on partners and governments to mobilize resources for its implementation. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/featured-topics/maf-tb">click here</a> to get more information.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The key findings of the report titled [inside]Rural Health Statistics 2020-21 (released in May 2022)[/inside], which has been prepared by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, are as follows (please <a href="/upload/files/Rural%20Health%20Statistics%202020-21.pdf">click here</a> to access):</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; As on 31st March, 2021, there were 1,56,101 and 1,718 Sub Centres (SCs), 25,140 and 5,439 Primary Health Centres (PHCs), and 5,481 and 470 Community Health Centres (CHCs), respectively, which were functioning in rural and urban areas of the country.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average rural population covered by a Sub Centre was 5,734 as on 1st July, 2021, whereas the norm is that one Sub Centre should be serving a population of size in the range 300-5,000.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average population in tribal/ hilly/ desert areas covered by a Sub Centre was 3,839 as on 1st July, 2021, whereas the norm is that one Sub Centre should be serving a population of size up to 3,000 in such areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; A Sub Centre is the most peripheral and first contact point between the primary health care system and the community. Sub Centres are assigned tasks relating to interpersonal communication in order to bring about behavioral change and provide services in relation to maternal and child health, family welfare, nutrition, immunisation, diarrhoea control and control of communicable diseases programmes. Each Sub Centre is required to be manned by at least one auxiliary nurse midwife (ANM) / female health worker and one male health worker. Under the National Rural Health Mission (NRHM), there is a provision for one additional second ANM on contract basis. One lady health visitor (LHV) is entrusted with the task of supervision of six Sub Centres. The Government of India bears the salary of ANM and LHV while the salary of the Male Health Worker is borne by the state governments.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average rural population covered by a Primary Health Centre (PHC) was 35,602 as on 1st July, 2021, whereas the norm is that one PHC should be serving a population of size in the range 20,000-30,000.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average population in tribal/ hilly/ desert areas covered by a PHC was 25,507 as on 1st July, 2021, whereas the norm is that one PHC should be serving a population of size up to 20,000 in such areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; PHC is the first contact point between the village community and the medical officer. The PHCs were envisaged to provide an integrated curative and preventive health care to the rural population with emphasis on preventive and promotive aspects of health care. The PHCs are established and maintained by the state governments under the Minimum Needs Programme (MNP)/ Basic Minimum Services (BMS) Programme. As per minimum requirement, a PHC is to be manned by a medical officer supported by 14 paramedical and other staff. Under NRHM, there is a provision for two additional staff nurses at PHCs on contract basis. It acts as a referral unit for 6 Sub Centres and has 4-6 beds for patients. The activities of PHC involve curative, preventive, promotive and family welfare services.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average rural population covered by a Community Health Centre (CHC) was 1,63,298 as on 1st July, 2021, whereas the norm is that one CHC should be serving a population of size in the range 80,000-1,20,000.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average population in tribal/ hilly/ desert areas covered by a CHC was 1,03,756 as on 1st July, 2021, whereas the norm is that one CHC should be serving a population of size up to 80,000 in such areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; CHCs are being established and maintained by the state government under Minimum Needs Program (MNP)/Basic Minimum Services (BMS) programme. As per minimum norms, a CHC is required to be manned by four medical specialists i.e. surgeon, physician, gynecologist and pediatrician supported by 21 paramedical and other staff. It has 30 indoor beds with one OT, X-ray, labour room and laboratory facilities. It serves as a referral centre for 4 PHCs and also provides facilities for obstetric care and specialist consultations.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Rural Health Care System in India</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Out of the sanctioned posts, a significant percentage of posts were vacant at all the levels. Nearly 21.1 percent of the sanctioned posts of Health Worker (Female)/ Auxiliary Nurse Midwife-ANM (at SCs and PHCs) were vacant as compared to 41.9 percent vacancies of Health Worker (Male) in 2021 at SCs. At PHCs, 64.2 percent of the sanctioned posts of Health Assistant (Male and Female) and 21.8 percent of the sanctioned posts of Doctors were vacant in 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The availability of manpower is one of the important prerequisites for the efficient functioning of the Rural Health services. As on 31st March, 2021, the overall shortfall (which excludes the existing surplus in some of the states) in the posts of Health Worker (Female) / ANM was 2.9 percent of the total requirement as per the norm of one HW(F)/ ANM per Sub Centre and PHC. The overall shortfall was mainly due to shortfall in states of Uttar Pradesh (1,871), Himachal Pradesh (1,253), Gujarat (616), Odisha (397), Tripura (380), and Uttarakhand (252).&nbsp;Similarly, in case of Health Worker (Male), there was a shortfall of 66.1 percent of the requirement. There was a vacancy of 21.1 percent for HW (Female)/ ANM (at SCs and PHCs) as compared to the sanctioned posts. There was a vacancy of 41.9 percent for Health Worker (Male) as compared to the sanctioned posts in 2021 at SCs. At PHCs, 64.2 percent of the sanctioned posts of Health Assistant (Male and Female) and 21.8 percent of the sanctioned posts of Doctors were vacant in 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; PHC is the first contact point between the village community and the Medical Officer. Manpower in PHC includes a Medical Officer supported by paramedical and other staff. In the case of PHC, for Health Assistant (male + female), the shortfall was 72.2 percent. For allopathic doctors at PHC, there was a shortfall of 4.3 percent of the total requirement at the national level. This happened due to a significant shortfall of doctors at PHCs in the states of Odisha (362), Karnataka (340), and Chhattisgarh (271).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The Community Health Centres provide specialised medical care of Surgeons, Obstetricians &amp; Gynecologists, Physicians and Pediatricians. The position of specialists manpower at CHCs as on 31st March, 2021 shows that out of the sanctioned posts, 72.3 percent of Surgeons, 64.2 percent of Obstetricians &amp; Gynecologists, 69.2 percent of physicians, and 67.1 percent of pediatricians were vacant. Overall 68 percent of the sanctioned posts of specialists at CHCs were vacant in rural areas. Moreover, as compared to requirements for existing infrastructure, there was a shortfall of 83.2 percent of Surgeons, 74.2 percent of Obstetricians &amp; Gynecologists, 82.2 percent of Physicians, and 80.6 percent of Pediatricians. Overall, there was a shortfall of 79.9 percent of specialists at the CHCs as compared to the requirement for existing CHCs. The shortfall of specialists was significantly high in most of the states. However, in addition to the specialists, about 17,012 General Duty Medical Officers (GDMOs) Allopathic and 514 AYUSH Specialists along with 2,955 GDMO AYUSH were also available at CHCs as on 31st March, 2021. In addition to this, there were 805 Anaesthetists and 289 Eye Surgeons available at CHCs as on 31st March, 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Comparison of the manpower position of major categories in 2021 with that in 2020 shows an overall increase in the number of ANMs at SCs &amp; PHCs and Doctors at PHCs during the period. However, there was a marginal decrease in the number of Specialists at CHCs. There was an increase of ANMs at SCs &amp; PHCs from 2,12,593 in 2020 to 2,14,820 in 2021 and Doctors at PHCs from 28,516 in 2020 to 31,716 in 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Considering the status of paramedical staff, there was an increase of Lab Technicians from 19,903 in 2020 to 22,723 in 2021 at PHCs and CHCs. There was an increase in the number of pharmacists from 25,792 in 2020 to 28,537 in 2021. A significant increase was also observed for nursing staff under PHC &amp; CHCs from 71,847 in 2020 to 79,044 in 2021. The number of radiographers decreased from 2,434 in 2020 to 2,418 in 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; A total of 1,224 Sub Divisional/ Sub District Hospitals were functioning as on 31st March, 2021 throughout the country. In these hospitals, 15,274 doctors were available. In addition to these doctors, nearly 42,073 paramedical staffs were also available at those hospitals as on 31st March, 2021. The number of doctors in Sub Divisional/ Sub District Hospitals increased from 13,399 in 2020 to 15,274 in 2021. The number of paramedical staff in Sub Divisional/ Sub District Hospitals also went up from 29,937 in 2020 to 42,073 in 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In addition to the above, 764 District Hospitals (DHs) were also functioning as on 31st March, 2021 throughout the country. There were 26,929 doctors available in the DHs. In addition to the doctors, roughly 90,435 paramedical staff were also available at District Hospitals as on 31st March, 2021. The number of doctors in District Hospitals went up from 22,827 in 2020 to 26,929 in 2021. The number of paramedical staff in District Hospitals increased from 80,920 in 2020 to 90,435 in 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The key findings of the report titled [inside]India TB Report 2022: Coming Together to End TB Altogether (released in March 2022)[/inside], which has been produced by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, are as follows (please <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/TB%20Annual%20Report%202022.pdf">click here</a> to access):&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; As per the Global TB Report 2021, the estimated incidence of all forms of TB in India for the year 2020 was 188 per 100,000 population (129-257 per 100,000 population).&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The total number of incident tuberculosis i.e., TB patients (new and relapse) notified during 2021 was 19,33,381 which was 19 percent higher than that of 2020 (16,28,161). The programme had been able to catch-up with the dip in TB notifications that was observed around the months when the two major covid waves happened in India.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The estimated incidence of all forms of TB in India as per Global TB report was 456 per lakh population in 2010, 437 per lakh population in 2011, 420 per lakh population in 2012, 404 per lakh population in 2013, 350 per lakh population in 2014, 328 per lakh population in 2015, 303 per lakh population in 2016, 286 per lakh population in 2017, 276 per lakh population in 2018, 266 per lakh population in 2019, and 257 per lakh population in 2020.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The estimated number of Multidrug-resistant (MDR) and Extensively drug-resistant (XDR) TB cases to have been put on treatment as per the global TB report 2021 was 4 per 100,000 and 1 per 100,000 population, respectively.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; During the pandemic, a significant reduction was observed in the total number of&nbsp;Drug-Resistant TB&nbsp;(DR-TB) patients started on treatment as compared to 2019. In 2020 and 2021, there was a reduction of 14 percent and 9 percent in the number MDR patients put on treatment as compared to the&nbsp;estimated numbers.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The estimated mortality rate among all forms of TB was 37 per 100,000 population (34-40 per 100,000 population) in 2020, as per the Global TB Report 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; There has been a slight increase in the mortality rate due to all forms of TB between 2019 and 2020 by 11 percent in the country.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In absolute numbers, the total number of estimated deaths from all forms of TB excluding HIV, for 2020 was 4.93 lakhs (4.53-5.36 lakhs) in the country, which was 13 percent higher that of the year 2019 estimate. &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; As per Nikshay, the total number of reported deaths among Drug sensitive (DS-TB) notified in 2020 was 76,002 (4.3 percent of the total notifications of 2020) which is 15.4 percent of the estimate for the country, thus emphasizing the importance of establishing a &ldquo;TB Death Surveillance and Response&rdquo; system in line with the maternal mortality surveillance to improve the coverage and real time resolution of lacunae including the system related factors.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; A recent systematic review (2020) estimating the direct&nbsp;and indirect patient costs of drug-sensitive and drug-resistant TB care in India reports that 7 to 32 percent of among DS-TB patients and 68 percent of DR-TB were experiencing catastrophic costs for TB care in India.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2021, among 21,35,830 patients diagnosed, 20,30,509 (95 percent) patients were put on treatment. 61 percent were male and 39 percent were female among the patients put on treatment.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Among the total notification, 6 percent patients were in paediatric age group. Among 17,51,437 TB patients notified in 2020, 83 percent were successfully treated while 4 percent died during treatment.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2021, 48,232 MDR/RR-TB patients were diagnosed and 43,380 (90 percent) were put on treatment. 8,455 Pre-XDR-TB, 376 XDR-TB and 13,724 H mono/poly patients were diagnosed and 7,562 (89 percent), 333 (89 percent) and 12,008 (87 percent) were put on treatment respectively.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; A total of 1939 patients were initiated on shorter oral Bdq-containing MDR/RR-TB regimen, 23,889 on longer M/XDR-TB regimen and 25,235 patients were initiated on shorter injection containing MDR-TB regimen.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The cohort of DR-TB patients initiated on treatment in 2019 reported 57 percent treatment success rate (34,535/60,873). This includes 39,358 of patients on shorter MDR-TB regimen (inj-containing) with 59 percent treatment success rate and 1,280 of patient on longer oral regimen with 70 percent treatment success rate. This cohort also includes 11,791 patients put on old conventional MDR-TB regimen that has reported 49 percent treatment success rate.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Available evidence and modelling studies indicate that nearly 20 percent of all TB cases in India may suffer from Diabetes Mellitus (DM).&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Under the&nbsp;National Tuberculosis Elimination Programme&nbsp;(NTEP), in 2021, out of the 74 percent of the known tobacco usage among all TB patients, 12 percent of TB patients were reported to be tobacco users. Among those screened, 30 percent were linked to tobacco cessation services.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Of all the notified TB patients, 95 percent know their HIV status. (Public: 96 percent, Private: 92 percent).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Nearly 95 percent of TB Detection Centres (TDCs) have co-located HIV testing facilities.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; More than 96 percent of&nbsp;People Living With HIV/AIDS&nbsp;(PLHIV) visiting the antiretroviral therapy (ART) centres every month are screened for existing TB symptoms.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; As per Nikshay data, the linkage of HIV-TB co-infected patients to Cotrimoxazole Preventive Therapy (CPT) and Antiretroviral Therapy in 2021 were 93 percent &amp; 95 percent, respectively.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Kindly click <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/JSA-Press-Statement-UB-2022-23-English-Final.pdf">here</a> and <a href="https://im4change.org/latest-news-updates/union-health-budget-2022-23-has-completely-overlooked-the-lessons-of-the-covid-19-epidemic-says-jan-swasthya-abhiyan.html">here</a> to access the [inside]Press release by Jan Swasthya Abhiyan dated February 2, 2022[/inside] on the Union Health Budget 2022-23.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">---</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The COVID-19 pandemic has devastated families and communities and disrupted societies and economies. Patients had to endure various indignities in both public and private hospitals without protections or recourse to adequate preventive and redressal mechanisms. While the COVID-19 vaccine is seen as a solution to the pandemic, its roll-out has also been rife with inequalities. However, many of the problems we have seen at this time stem from the deep-rooted problems in the public health system. A critical look at India&quot;s health system from the perspective of its patients is overdue.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Oxfam India undertook two rapid surveys on Patient&quot;s Rights Charter and COVID-19 vaccination through self-administered questionnaires, covering 28 states and 5 Union territories; as such, this bears the limitations arising from it being a self-selected sample. The former was done between February and April 2021 and received 3890 responses while the latter was done between August and September 2021 covering 10,955 respondents. Given the distinctive focus of each survey, both are presented separately.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The key findings of the survey on Patient&#39;s Rights done for Oxfam India report titled [inside]Securing Rights of Patients in India: Lessons from rapid surveys on peoples&rsquo; experiences of Patient&rsquo;s Rights Charter and the COVID-19 vaccination drive (released on 18 November, 2021)[/inside] are as follows (please <a href="/upload/files/Securing%20Rights%20of%20Patients%20in%20India%20by%20Oxfam%20India.pdf">click here</a> to access):&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; This captures some of the experience of patients with both the public and private healthcare system over the last decade with a focus on the provisions of the Patients &quot;Rights Charter.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Right to Confidentiality, Human Dignity and Privacy: Over a third of women (35 percent) said that they had to undergo a physical examination by a male practitioner without another female present in the room.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Right to Information: 74 percent of people said that the doctor simply wrote the prescription or treatment or asked them to get tests/ investigations done without explaining their disease, nature and/or cause of illness.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Right to Informed Consent: More than half of the respondents (57 percent) who were themselves/ their relatives had been hospitalised did not receive any information about investigations and tests being done.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Right to Second Opinion: At least a third of respondents who had themselves/ their relatives hospitalised said their doctor did not allow a second opinion.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Right to Non-Discrimination: A third of Muslim respondents and over 20 percent Dalit and Adivasi respondents reported feeling discriminated against on the grounds of their religion or caste in a hospital/ by a healthcare professional.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Right to Choose Source of Obtaining Medicine or Test: 8 in 10 respondents reported being asked to get tests/diagnostics from one place only.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Right to Transparency in Rates and Care According to Prescribed Rates: 58 percent of people of those who had themselves/ their relatives hospitalised, said that they were not provided with an estimated cost of treatment/procedure before the start of treatment/procedure. Three in every 10 people surveyed reported being denied case papers, patient records, investigation reports for treatment/ procedure by the hospital even after requesting the same.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Right to Take Discharge of Patient or Receive Body of Deceased from the Hospital: 19 percent of respondents whose close relatives were hospitalized said that they were denied the release of the dead body by the hospital</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em>The COVID-19 pandemic has deepened existing structural inequalities in the healthcare system. The report recommends:</em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The MoHFW should set up a mechanism to review the present status of adoption of the Patient&quot;s Rights Charter (PRC) in all states and UTs and order its immediate adoption. It should include the PRC in the Clinical Establishment Act (CEA) and issue a letter to the states and Union territories (UTs) for displaying PRC in all private and public hospitals in view of the unprecedented crisis induced by the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly for hospitals taking part in the Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (PMJAY).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The State and UT governments should issue orders to display the PRC in all private and public hospitals irrespective of adoption of CEA and ensure grievance redressal mechanisms for patients, through the appointment of an internal grievance officer within every public and private clinical establishment.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The National Medical Commission should introduce mandatory modules on patients &quot;rights in the healthcare curriculum.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em>Some of the key findings from the survey of the experiences of the vaccination drive were:</em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Eight out of 10 people said that they do not think that the government will be able to vaccinate all adults by December 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; 80 percent of people believed that it is more difficult for a daily wage worker to get the vaccine as compared to a salaried, middle-class person. Most did not think that the experience was equitable.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; With respect to how the government should address inequity in vaccination, some specific suggestions were:&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">- 83 percent believed that all vaccination should be done completely free of cost through the government, like previous vaccination drives.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">- Only 2 percent of respondents were in favour of a tax on essentials like fuel to fund the vaccination. 55 percent believed that imposing a one-time tax of 1 percent on the net-worth of India&quot;s richest 1000 families was the best mode of funding.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">- 89 percent of people said that the operational hours of vaccination centres should be expanded beyond 9 AM-5 PM.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">- 95 percent of people from all age categories felt that vaccination must be brought closer to the elderly, persons with disabilities and informal sector workers by making use of mobile vans, vaccination camps and home-based vaccination.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">- 88 percent believed that the government must ensure that marginalized groups such as street dwellers, migrant workers, immigrants, refugees and asylum seekers are given access to<br /> vaccination without having to furnish documentation.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">- Improve information about vaccination. 74 percent of respondents earned less than INR 10,000 per month and over 60 percent of respondents from marginalized and minority communities felt that the government has failed in informing them about how and when to get vaccinated. Eight in 10 felt that the government had been changing its COVID-19 vaccine policies too frequently.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">- 89 percent of people said that the government must do more to ramp vaccine production, especially through public sector companies.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">- The experiences of vaccination show the</p> <p style="text-align:justify">-- Challenges with vaccination:</p> <p style="text-align:justify">---29 percent said that they either had to make multiple visits to the vaccination centre or stand in long queues.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">---22 percent faced issues in booking the slot online or had to try for multiple days ahead to get a slot</p> <p style="text-align:justify">---9 percent people said that they had to lose a day&#39;s wages to get themselves vaccinated.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">-- Reason for not getting vaccinated:</p> <p style="text-align:justify">---43 percent respondents stated that they could not get vaccinated because the vaccination centre had run out of vaccines when they visited the centre.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">---12 percent did not get vaccinated because they could not afford the high prices of vaccines.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The lessons from the COVID-19 vaccination drive, would not only help to improve the current response but can derive learnings improving equitable administration of any vaccine in future.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">-All vaccination should continue to be done completely free of cost through the government system; avoid the use of private hospitals to deliver vaccination;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">-Proactively release timely information on vaccination strategies, modalities and accomplishments in disaggregated, user-friendly and open source formats;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">-Prioritise allocation, distribution and administration of vaccines for marginalized, poor, vulnerable, excluded communities first, of course along with for those who are at risk;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">-Maintain record and release disaggregated data on vaccination coverage based on social and economic groups including Dalits(Scheduled Caste), Adivasis(Scheduled Tribes), Muslims, and Persons with Disabilities (PwD);<br /> &nbsp;<br /> -Bring vaccination closer to the vulnerable and extend operational hours of vaccination centres beyond 9 AM-5 PM to allow for vaccination without a loss of wages;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">-Improve information dissemination about vaccination; existing technology-based mechanisms for disseminating information about vaccination centres locations and availability of vaccines is not sufficient. It would be important to build robust and functional grievance redressal mechanisms, from national to local, to address emerging challenges. Adequate flexibility must be given to local health administrations to adapt to local circumstances;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">-Further ramp up vaccine production, especially through the use of public sector companies.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The report titled [inside]&#39;COVID-19 Third Wave Preparedness: Children&rsquo;s Vulnerability and Recovery&#39; (released on 2nd August, 2021)[/inside] is the outcome of a two-part series of online consultative meetings hosted by National Institute of Disaster Management (NIDM, Delhi). These working group consultative meetings largely included &nbsp;stakeholders from diverse backgrounds -- Central &nbsp;Government, State &nbsp;Governments, Civil Society Organisations (CSOs), social workers, humanitarians, academicians, scientists and researchers. Drawing lessons from the first and second waves, through the deliberations by leading experts during these meetings, the NIDM has been able to produce in the form of final outcome, recommendations for the preparedness of the third wave on the issues related to children and women and their well-being. Kindly <a href="/upload/files/NIDM%20report.pdf">click here</a> to access the report.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The consultative meetings held by NIDM with various stakeholders strongly recommended: a home care model, ramping up of vaccination especially for parents, nurses and other front-line workers, immediate recruitment of healthcare staffs and medical facilities for children, guarantee food security especially for the vulnerable amongst vulnerable, strengthen the community level engagement and risk awareness and communication, zero tolerance towards sexual abuse of children and women and raising awareness through a massive public outreach campaign. There is a huge gap between urban and rural India in terms of awareness, digitisation and medical facilities. It seems like the pandemic outbreak has only exacerbated social inequities and highlighted shortcomings of our society. Hence, the government must prioritise rural India and vulnerable groups in order to cope with the ongoing pandemic. This special report also outlines the women-children complementarity, suggesting that a child&rsquo;s inclusive growth largely depends on that of the mother.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">---</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> The <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/Inequality%20Report%202021%20Indias%20Unequal%20Healthcare%20Story.pdf">report</a> titled Inequality Report 2021: India&#39;s Unequal Healthcare Story examines the status of inequality across various indicators of health among different sections of the population from 2005-06 to 2015-16. The report analyses the government interventions made in terms of health programmes and its impact on health inequality. It also includes ground experiences of people, particularly the marginalised groups, during the pandemic.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The key findings of the [inside]Oxfam India&#39;s Inequality Report 2021: India&#39;s Unequal Healthcare Story (released on 19th July, 2021)[/inside] are as follows (please <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/Inequality%20Report%202021%20Indias%20Unequal%20Healthcare%20Story.pdf">click here</a> to access):&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Growing socio-economic inequalities in India are disproportionately affecting health outcomes of marginalised groups due to the absence of Universal Health Coverage (UHC), reveals Oxfam <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/Inequality%20Report%202021%20Indias%20Unequal%20Healthcare%20Story.pdf">India&rsquo;s Inequality Report</a> <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/Inequality%20Report%202021%20Indias%20Unequal%20Healthcare%20Story.pdf">2021: India&rsquo;s Unequal Healthcare Story</a>.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The new <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/Inequality%20Report%202021%20Indias%20Unequal%20Healthcare%20Story.pdf">report</a> by Oxfam India provides a comprehensive analysis of the health outcomes across different socioeconomic groups to gauge the level of health inequality that persists in the country. The report shows the general category performs better than Scheduled Castes-SCs and Scheduled Tribes-STs; Hindus perform better than Muslims; the rich perform better than the poor; men are better off than women; and the urban population is better off than the rural population on various health indicators. The COVID-19 pandemic has further exacerbated these inequalities.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The public healthcare system in India with its weak and understaffed infrastructure has been overburdened with the consistently rising cases. Private healthcare providers, on the other hand, were charging exorbitant prices, preventing the middle-class and the poor from getting diagnosed and treated until the government intervened to cap their prices. Even then, private healthcare has remained inaccessible to the poor while the rich have easily availed its services. As such, the poor and the vulnerable have mostly been dependent on the overburdened public healthcare facilities &mdash; with insufficient number of beds and inadequate human resources &mdash; for treatment or have gone without being diagnosed and treated.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Health inequalities are linked to and reflect socio-economic inequalities. Often times, it is the socio-economically marginalised communities that suffer from ill-health the most. The ongoing pandemic has revealed that the health systems in most countries are under-prepared to cope with any major health emergency and its unequal impact on the have and the have-nots.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Over the last few decades, India has made great progress in healthcare provisioning. Yet, progressively, the trend has been towards supporting the growth of the private sector in healthcare. This growth has only exacerbated the existing inequalities leaving the poor and the marginalised with no viable healthcare provisions. High costs of health services and lack of quality leads to further impoverishment of the disadvantaged.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The private health sector provided only 5-10 percent of total patient care when India gained independence. Today, it accounts for 66 percent of hospitalization and non-hospitalization cases and 33 percent of institutional births. This growth has been boosted by government concessions and has attracted domestic and foreign companies to set up tertiary care and super speciality hospitals. Within the country, the private formal sector has a distinct customer base. They are the urban-rich. Dehury et al. writes that private hospitals &lsquo;cater to a pool of patient community having health insurance, corporate tie-ups and referrals from general physicians. Usually, the paying capacity of these patients [are] higher than the common Indian citizen&hellip;these hospitals cater to the Indian elite class and organized sector workers having all financial protection.&rsquo;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The private sector is geared towards profits whereas the public provisioning of health services ensures that the poor and the marginalised have equal access to quality healthcare services closer to home. India&rsquo;s public health provisioning has, however, been weak. The public expenditure on health by the central government as a percentage of GDP was a mere 0.32 percent in 2019-20.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The combined expenditure by state and central government was about 1.16 percent of the GDP in 2019, rising marginally by 0.02 percent from 2018 &mdash; falling far behind the goal of making health expenditure 2.5 percent of the GDP. The per capita health expenditure is highest in Arunachal Pradesh at INR 9,854 and lowest in Bihar at INR 697. In the 2021-22 budget, the health ministry has been allocated a total of INR 76,901 crore, a decline of 9.8 percent from the revised estimates of 2020-21 at INR 85,250 crore.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Public funds for health has also been invested specifically in secondary and tertiary care rather than in the provisioning of primary healthcare. &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The public sector has prioritized secondary and tertiary care over primary care. Yet, experts acknowledge that primary care is the cornerstone of achieving equitable delivery and access to quality healthcare by all. While focus has been put on achieving Universal Healthcare in India; the government has selectively adopted the insurance model as a way to universalise healthcare instead of enhancing the primary health care system. As such, access to good quality public healthcare has remained fragmented and India is still far away from achieving universal coverage. The rich can avail healthcare from high-end private providers but the poor are stuck with a difficult choice. They either have to incur debts by availing health care from private providers or depend on a poor public healthcare system.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The Planning Commission in 2011 had observed that expenditure in secondary and tertiary care was drawing away attention from primary health services. Research studies substantiate this position and it is argued that &lsquo;[s]ubstantial proportions of the health budgets have been spent on&hellip;high-end tertiary medical services &mdash; all of which largely benefits the middle classes and detracts from the provision of public health services.&rsquo; Studies have also attributed India&rsquo;s high disease burden to the government&rsquo;s exclusive focus on the urban-oriented curative medical model. The government&rsquo;s focus on &lsquo;a heavily medicalized and hightech curative medical interventions&rsquo;&nbsp;has derailed the goal to make quality and affordable public healthcare accessible to all irrespective of their ability to pay. The result has been a widening of health inequalities along caste, class, gender and geography.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; To make the goals of National Health Mission (NRHM and National Urban Health Mission were subsumed under the NHM in 2013) a reality, there needs to be a strong public health infrastructure in place, even in hard-to-reach areas. Sufficient medical supplies, equipment, drugs and trained medical staff in health centres should be the standard. On the contrary, public health centres remain understaffed with limited supplies.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Among other things, the Inequality Report 2021 on health has recommended the government to increase health spending to 2.5 percent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) to ensure a more equitable health system in the country; ensure that union budgetary allocation in health for SCs and STs is proportionate to their population; prioritize primary health by ensuring that two-thirds of the health budget is allocated for strengthening primary healthcare; state governments to allocate their expenditure on health to 2.5 percent of Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP); the centre should extend financial support to the states with low per capita health expenditure to reduce inter-state inequality in health. It has asked to widen the ambit of insurance schemes to include out-patient care. The major expenditures on health happen through out-patient costs as consultations, diagnostic tests, medicines, etc. While the report does not endorse Government-financed Health Insurance Schemes (GFHIS) as a way to achieve UHC and stresses that insurance can only be a component of it, it is imperative that GFHIS widens its ambit to include outpatient costs as a way to reduce out-of-pocket expenditure (OOPE).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The Constitution of India does not guarantee a fundamental right to health though it does refer to the role of the government in the provisioning of healthcare to all its citizens. Therefore, the right to health should be enacted as a fundamental right that makes it obligatory for the government to ensure equal access to timely, acceptable, and affordable healthcare of appropriate quality, and address the underlying determinants of health to close the gap in health outcomes between the rich and poor.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; With the lockdown aimed at checking the spread of COVID-19, health systems prioritized services related only to COVID-19. Human and material resources like hospitals, beds and intensive care units were diverted towards the management and treatment of COVID-19 patients. Health services catering to non-Covid illnesses were halted, leading to unprecedented hardships and sufferings for chronic patients and those requiring immediate medical intervention such as pregnant women. Accessibility to non-Covid medical services were grimmer for patients in rural and hard-to-reach areas as compared to urban areas due to the unavailability of health centres in the vicinity and the lack of transportation facilities.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Disruptions in the availability of drugs for non-communicable diseases (NCD), tuberculosis (TB), contraceptive and other essential services were also reported. Telemedicine &mdash; the practice of caring for patients remotely &mdash; for which guidelines were issued by the Government of India in March 2020 to facilitate access to medical advice made consultations easier. However, for those with no smart phones and internet connectivity, particularly in rural and hard-to-reach areas, seeking medical advice remained a difficult task. The immunization drive was also disrupted. India vaccinates around 20 million children every year and its disruption might add to the largest number of unimmunized children in the world.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The National Health Profile in 2017 recorded one government allopathic doctor for every 10,189 people and one state-run hospital for every 90,343 people. India also ranks the lowest in the number of hospital beds per thousand population among the BRICS nations &mdash; Russia scores the highest (7.12), followed by China (4.3), South Africa (2.3), Brazil (2.1) and India (0.5). India also ranks lower than some of the lesser developed countries such as Bangladesh (0.87), Chile (2.11) and Mexico (0.98).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The current expenditure on health, by the Centre and the state governments combined, is only about 1.25 percent of GDP which is the lowest among the BRICS countries &mdash; Brazil (9.2) has the highest allocation, followed by South Africa (8.1), Russia (5.3) and China (5.0). It is also lower than some of its neighbouring countries such as Bhutan (2.5 percent) and Sri Lanka (1.6 percent). The low priority given to health expenditure is also reflected in the share in total expenditure of the government, which is only 4 percent whereas the global average stands at 11 percent. In Oxfam&rsquo;s Commitment to Reducing Inequality Report 2020, India ranks 154th in health spending, fifth from the bottom. This poor spending is reflected in the inadequate health resources and infrastructure. Only around 50,069 health and wellness centres (HWCs), which are envisaged to deliver comprehensive primary healthcare (CPHC) closer to homes, are functional. These centres are only 65 percent of the cumulative target for 2020-21. Moreover, in 2019, less than 10 percent of PHCs were funded as per IPHS norms whereas the rest remained underfunded.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Different studies have proved that low public health expenditure yields worse health outcomes. Studies by Barenberg et al. investigated the impact of public health expenditure on Infant Mortality Rate (IMR) and found a negative relationship between the two. Farahani et al. evaluated the relationship between state-level public health spending of India and individual mortality across all age groups using household-level data from the third National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3) showing that a 10 percent increase in public spending on health decreases mortality by about 2 percent, with effects mainly concentrated on women, the young, and the elderly.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The out-of-pocket health expenditure of 64.2 percent in India is higher than the world average of 18.2 percent. Exorbitant prices of healthcare has forced many to sell household assets and incur debts.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The global average for life expectancy is 72.6 years but India (69.42) remains below the global average. It is also lower than the neighbouring countries Nepal (70.8), Bhutan (71.8), Bangladesh (72.6), and Sri Lanka (77) and its BRICS counterparts Brazil (75.9), China (76.9), and Russia (72.6).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; A comprehensive provisioning of public health as water, sanitation and primary healthcare is the most efficient and cost-effective way to achieve UHC around the world.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Evidence from Thailand and Sri Lanka, which have performed better than India with regard to universal access to healthcare, shows that these countries have a high public provisioning of services. Also, evidence from developed countries like Germany, Sweden, Canada and developing countries like Costa Rica reveal that successful insurance-based healthcare system was attained with high levels of public spending and government provisioning of healthcare services.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The Oxfam India <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/Inequality%20Report%202021%20Indias%20Unequal%20Healthcare%20Story.pdf">report</a> says that &lsquo;Kerala invested in infrastructure to create a multi-layered health system, designed to provide first-contact access for basic services at the community level and expanded integrated primary healthcare coverage to achieve access to a range of preventive and curative services&hellip;[,] expanded the number of medical facilities, hospital beds, and doctors&hellip;[and] public health and social development initiatives&hellip; aided in creating the environment for a strong and effective primary care system.&rsquo;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="/upload/files/SOPonCOVID19Containment%26ManagementinPeriurbanRural%26tribalareas.pdf">click here</a> to access the [inside]Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) on COVID-19 Containment and Management in Peri-urban, Rural and Tribal areas[/inside] dated 16th May, 2021. The SOP was issued by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>---</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">The key findings of the report titled [inside]Rural Health Statistics 2019-20 (released in April 2021)[/inside], which has been prepared by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, are as follows (please <a href="/upload/files/Rural%20Health%20Statistics%202019-20%20report%20MoHFW%20latest%20available%282%29.pdf">click here</a> to access):</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; As on 31st March, 2020, there were 1,55,404 and 2,517 Sub Centres (SCs), 24,918 and 5,895 Primary Health Centres (PHCs) and 5,183 and 466 Community Health Centres (CHCs), respectively, which were functioning in rural and urban areas of the country.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average rural population covered by a Sub Centre was 5,729 as on 1st July, 2020, whereas the norm is that one Sub Centre should be serving a population of size in the range 300-5,000.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average population in tribal/ hilly/ desert areas covered by a Sub Centre was 3,381 as on 1st July, 2020, whereas the norm is that one Sub Centre should be serving a population of size up to 3,000 in such areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; A Sub Centre is the most peripheral and first contact point between the primary health care system and the community. Sub Centres are assigned tasks relating to interpersonal communication in order to bring about behavioral change and provide services in relation to maternal and child health, family welfare, nutrition, immunisation, diarrhoea control and control of communicable diseases programmes. Each Sub Centre is required to be manned by at least one auxiliary nurse midwife (ANM) / female health worker and one male health worker. Under the National Rural Health Mission (NRHM), there is a provision for one additional second ANM on contract basis. One lady health visitor (LHV) is entrusted with the task of supervision of six Sub Centres. The Government of India bears the salary of ANM and LHV while the salary of the Male Health Worker is borne by the state governments.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average rural population covered by a Primary Health Centre (PHC) was 35,730 as on 1st July, 2020, whereas the norm is that one Primary Health Centre should be serving a population of size in the range 20,000-30,000.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average population in tribal/ hilly/ desert areas covered by a PHC was 23,930 as on 1st July, 2020, whereas the norm is that one PHC should be serving a population of size up to 20,000 in such areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; PHC is the first contact point between the village community and the medical officer. The PHCs were envisaged to provide an integrated curative and preventive health care to the rural population with emphasis on preventive and promotive aspects of health care. The PHCs are established and maintained by the state governments under the Minimum Needs Programme (MNP)/ Basic Minimum Services (BMS) Programme. As per minimum requirement, a PHC is to be manned by a medical officer supported by 14 paramedical and other staff. Under NRHM, there is a provision for two additional staff nurses at PHCs on contract basis. It acts as a referral unit for 6 Sub Centres and has 4-6 beds for patients. The activities of PHC involve curative, preventive, promotive and family welfare services.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average rural population covered by a Community Health Centre was 1,71,779 as on 1st July, 2020, whereas the norm is that one Community Health Centre should be serving a population of size in the range 80,000-1,20,000.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average population in tribal/ hilly/ desert areas covered by a CHC was 97,178 as on 1st July, 2020, whereas the norm is that one CHC should be serving a population of size up to 80,000 in such areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; CHCs are being established and maintained by the state government under Minimum Needs Program (MNP)/Basic Minimum Services (BMS) programme. As per minimum norms, a CHC is required to be manned by four medical specialists i.e. surgeon, physician, gynecologist and pediatrician supported by 21 paramedical and other staff. It has 30 indoor beds with one OT, X-ray, labour room and laboratory facilities. It serves as a referral centre for 4 PHCs and also provides facilities for obstetric care and specialist consultations.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em>Rural Health Care System in India</em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Out of the sanctioned posts, a significant percentage of posts were vacant at all the levels. Nearly 14.1 percent of the sanctioned posts of Health Worker (Female)/ ANM (at SCs +PHCs) were vacant as compared to 37 percent vacancies of Health Worker (Male) in 2020. At PHCs, 37.6 percent of the sanctioned posts of Health Assistant (Male + Female) and 24.1 percent of the sanctioned posts of Doctors were vacant in 2020.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The availability of manpower is one of the important prerequisites for the efficient functioning of the Rural Health services. As on 31st March, 2020, the overall shortfall (which excludes the existing surplus in some of the states) in the posts of Health Worker (Female) / ANM was 2 percent of the total requirement as per the norm of one HW(F)/ ANM per Sub Centre and PHC. The overall shortfall was mainly due to the shortfall in states of Gujarat (1073), Himachal Pradesh (992), Rajasthan (657), Tripura (389) and Kerala (277). Similarly, in case of Health Worker (Male), there was a shortfall of 65.5 percent of the requirement.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; PHC is the first contact point between the village community and the Medical Officer. Manpower in PHC includes a Medical Officer supported by paramedical and other staff. In the case of PHC, for Health Assistant (male + female), the shortfall was 71.9 percent. For allopathic doctors at PHC, there was a shortfall of 6.8 percent of the total requirement at all India level. This shortfall happened due to a significant shortfall of doctors at PHCs in the states of Odisha (461), Chhattisgarh (404), Rajasthan (249), Madhya Pradesh (134), Uttar Pradesh (121) and Karnataka (105).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The Community Health Centres provide specialised medical care of Surgeons, Obstetricians &amp; Gynecologists, Physicians and Pediatricians. The latest available position of specialists manpower at CHCs as on 31st March, 2020 shows that out of the sanctioned posts, 68.4 percent of Surgeons, 56.1 percent of Obstetricians &amp; Gynecologists, 66.8 percent of physicians and 63.1 percent of pediatricians were vacant. Overall 63.3 percent of the sanctioned posts of specialists at CHCs were vacant. Moreover, as compared to requirements for existing infrastructure, there was a shortfall of 78.9 percent of Surgeons, 69.7 percent of Obstetricians &amp; Gynecologists, 78.2 percent of Physicians and 78.2 percent of Pediatricians. Overall, there was a shortfall of 76.1 percent of specialists at the CHCs as compared to the requirement for existing CHCs. The shortfall of specialists was significantly high in most of the states. However, in addition to the specialists, about 15,342 General Duty Medical Officers (GDMOs) Allopathic and 702 AYUSH Specialists along with 2,720 GDMO AYUSH were also available at CHCs as on 31st March, 2020. In addition to this, there were 890 Anaesthetists and 301 Eye Surgeons available at CHCs as on 31st March, 2020.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Comparison of the manpower position of major categories in 2020 with that in 2019 shows an overall decrease in the number of ANMs at SCs &amp; PHCs and Doctors at PHCs during the period. However, there was an increase in the number of Specialists at CHCs. The number of Specialists at CHCs had increased from 3,881 in 2019 to 4,857 in 2020, which was an increase of 27.7 percent.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Considering the status of paramedical staff, there was an increase of Lab Technicians from 18,715 in 2019 to 19,903 in 2020 at PHCs and CHCs. There was a marginal decrease in the number of pharmacists from 26,204 in 2019 to 25,792 in 2020. A significant decrease was also observed in nursing staff under PHC &amp; CHCs from 80,976 in 2019 to 71,847 in 2020. The number of radiographers had increased marginally from 2,419 in 2019 to 2,434 in 2020.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; A total of 1,193 Sub Divisional/ Sub District Hospitals were functioning as on 31st March, 2020 throughout the country. In these hospitals, 13,399 doctors were available. In addition to these doctors, about 29,937 paramedical staff were also available at those hospitals as on 31st March, 2020. The number of doctors in Sub Divisional/ Sub District Hospitals had reduced from 13,750 in 2019 to 13,399 in 2020. The number of paramedical staff in Sub Divisional/ Sub District Hospitals fell from 36,909 in 2019 to 29,937 in 2020.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In addition to above, 810 District Hospitals (DHs) were also functioning as on 31st March, 2020 throughout the country. There were 22,827 doctors available in the DHs. In addition to the doctors, about 80,920 paramedical staff were also available at District Hospitals as on 31st March, 2020. The number of doctors in District Hospitals went down from 24,676 in 2019 to 22,827 in 2020. The number of paramedical staff in District Hospitals fell from 85,194 in 2019 to 80,920 in 2020.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; As per the Health &amp; Wellness Centre (HWC) portal data, there were a total of 38,595 HWCs functional in India as on 31st March 2020. In total, 18,610 SCs had been converted into HWC-SCs. Also at the level of PHC, a total of 19,985 PHCs had been converted into HWC-PHCs. Out of 19,985 HWC-PHCs, 16,635 PHCs had been converted into HWCs in rural areas and 3,350 in urban areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">**page**</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">Kindly <a href="/upload/files/LASI_India_Factsheet.pdf">click here</a> to access the [inside]India Fact Sheet of Longitudinal Ageing Study in India (LASI) -- Wave-1 (released in 2021)[/inside], An Investigation of Health, Economic, and Social Well-being of India&rsquo;s Growing Elderly Population, India Report 2020, prepared by International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), National Programme for Health Care Elderly (NPHCE), Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health (HSPH), University&nbsp; of Southern California (USC) and Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MoHFW).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="/upload/files/LASI_India_Executive_Summary.pdf">click here</a> to read the [inside]Executive Summary of Longitudinal Ageing Study in India (LASI) -- Wave-1 (released in 2021)[/inside].</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>---</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to the report entitled [inside]A Neglected Tragedy: The global burden of stillbirths -- Report of the UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation, 2020 (released in October 2020)[/inside] (please click <a href="https://www.im4change.org/upload/files/UN-IGME-the-global-burden-of-stillbirths-2020.pdf">here</a> to access):</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; About one stillbirth occurs every 16 seconds, which means that every year, about 2 million babies are stillborn i.e. showing no signs of life at birth. It means every day, almost 5,400 babies are stillborn. Globally, one in 72 babies is stillborn.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In the past two decades, 48 million babies were stillborn. Three-in-four stillbirths occur in sub-Saharan Africa or Southern Asia. Low and lower-middle income countries account for 84 percent of all stillbirths but only 62 percent of all live births.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Stillbirths are largely absent in worldwide data tracking, rendering the true extent of the problem hidden. They are invisible in policies and programmes and underfinanced as an area requiring intervention. Targets specific to stillbirths were absent from the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and are still missing in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; There are a variety of reasons behind the slow reduction in stillbirth rates: absence of or poor quality of care during pregnancy and birth; lack of investment in preventative interventions and the health workforce; inadequate social recognition of stillbirths as a burden on families; measurement challenges and major data gaps; absence of global and national leadership; and no established global targets, such as the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Globally, an estimated 42 percent of all stillbirths are intrapartum (i.e., the baby died during labour); almost all of these 832,000 stillborn deaths that occurred in 2019 could have been prevented with access to high-quality care during childbirth, including ongoing intrapartum monitoring and timely intervention in case of complications.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Around 20 million babies are projected to be stillborn in the next decade, if trends observed between 2000 and 2019 in reducing the stillbirth rate continue. Among the 20 million, 2.9 million stillbirths could be prevented by accelerating progress to meet the ENAP target in the 56 countries at risk to miss the goal. Every Newborn Action Plan (ENAP) calls for each country to achieve a rate of 12 stillbirths or fewer per 1,000 total births by 2030 and to close equity gaps.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In the first two decades of this century (i.e. 2000-2019), the annual rate of reduction (ARR) in the stillbirth rate was just -2.3 percent, compared to a -2.9 percent reduction in neonatal mortality and -4.3 percent among children aged 1&ndash;59 months. Meanwhile, between 2000 and 2017, maternal mortality decreased by -2.9 percent.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In the year 2000, the ratio of the number of stillbirths to the number of under-five deaths was 0.30; by 2019, it had increased to 0.38. So, stillbirths are an increasingly critical global health problem.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; National stillbirth rates around the globe ranged from 1.4 to 32.2 stillbirths per 1,000 total births in 2019. Sub-Saharan Africa, followed by Southern Asia, had the highest stillbirth rate and the greatest number of stillbirths.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Six countries bore the burden of half of all stillbirths of the world &ndash; India, Pakistan, Nigeria, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, China and Ethiopia, in order of burden (highest to lowest).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Nearly 3,40,622 of the 19,66,000&nbsp; stillbirths globally in 2019 were in India, making it the country with the largest such burden (i.e. 17.33 percent).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2019, India, Pakistan and Nigeria alone accounted for one-third of the total burden of stillbirths and 27 percent of live births.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Stillbirth rate is defined as the ratio of the number of still births per 1,000 live births and stillbirths taken together (i.e. total births).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Some progress has been made in preventing stillbirths. Globally, the stillbirth rate declined by 35 percent since 2000. Since 2000, the stillbirth rate declined by 44 percent in Central and Southern Asia, 53 percent in India, 52 percent in Kazakhstan and 44 percent in Nepal.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Among the lower-middle income countries, stillbirth rate fell by 39 percent since 2000. Since the year 2000, stillbirth rate in lower-middle income countries like Mongolia, India and El Salvador declined by 57 percent, 53 percent and 50 percent, respectively.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; A total of 14 countries &ndash; including three low- and lower middle income countries (Cambodia, India, Mongolia) &ndash; slashed the stillbirth rate by more than half during 2000-2019.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The top 15 countries with the greatest percentage decline in the stillbirth rate during 2000&ndash;2019 are China (63 percent), Turkey (63 percent), Georgia (62 percent), North Macedonia (62 percent), Belarus (60 percent), Mongolia (57 percent), Netherlands (55 percent), Azerbaijan (53 percent), Estonia (53 percent), India (53 percent), Kazakhstan (52 percent), Romania (52 percent), El Salvador (50 percent), Peru (48 percent) and Latvia (46 percent).<br /> &nbsp;<br /> &bull; India&#39;s stillbirth rate (i.e. (stillbirths per 1,000 total births) in 2000 was 29.6, in 2010 was 20.2 and in 2019 was 13.9. The percentage decline in India&#39;s stillbirth rate during 2000&ndash;2019 was -53.0 percent. The annual rate of reduction (ARR) in stillbirth rate during 2000-2019 was -4.0 percent.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The total number of stillbirths in India was 852,386 in 2000, 535,683 in 2010 and 340,622 in 2019. The percentage decline in stillbirths during 2000&ndash;2019 was -60.0 percent. The annual rate of reduction (ARR) in total number of stillbirths during 2000&ndash;2019 was -4.8 percent. India witnessed 24,116,000 livebirths and 24,457,000 total births in 2019. &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Women in sub-Saharan Africa and Southern Asia bear the greatest burden of stillbirths in the world. More than three quarters of estimated stillbirths in 2019 occurred in these two regions, with 42 percent of the global total in sub-Saharan Africa and 34 percent in Southern Asia.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2019, stillbirth rate per 1,000 total births in Afghanistan was 28.4 (total stillbirth in 2019: 35,384), Bangladesh was 24.3 (total stillbirth in 2019: 72,508), Bhutan was 9.7 (total stillbirth in 2019: 127), China was 5.5 (total stillbirth in 2019: 92,170), India was 13.9 (total stillbirth in 2019: 340,622), Maldives was 5.8 (total stillbirth in 2019: 41), Myanmar was 14.1 (total stillbirth in 2019: 13,493), Nepal was 17.5 (total stillbirth in 2019: 9,997), Pakistan was 30.6 (total stillbirth in 2019: 190,483) and Sri Lanka was 5.8 (total stillbirth in 2019: 1,943).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Data are essential to understanding the burden of stillbirths and identifying where, when and why they occur.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Immediate actions are needed to strengthen data systems and their ability to collect, analyses and use timely, quality and disaggregated stillbirth data. To improve stillbirth data availability and quality, it is recommended that countries and relevant stakeholders:</p> <p style="text-align:justify">a. Align the stillbirth definition and measures with international standards<br /> b.&nbsp; Integrate stillbirth-specific components within relevant plans for data system strengthening and improvement<br /> c. Record stillbirth outcomes in all relevant maternal and newborn health programs, including routine HMIS (registers and monthly reporting forms)<br /> d. Provide training and support to include stillbirths within civil and vital registration systems as the coverage of these systems increases<br /> e. Include information on timing of stillbirth (antepartum or intrapartum) in all settings and record causes and contributing factors to stillbirth where possible<br /> f. Report and review stillbirth data locally &ndash; at facility or district level &ndash; alongside data on neonatal deaths (by day of death) to reduce incentives for misreporting of outcomes, and to monitor potential misclassification.<br /> g. Collate reported stillbirth rate data up the data system to a national level to enable tracking of progress towards the ENAP target of 12 stillbirths or fewer per 1,000 total births in every country by 2030 and to enable monitoring of geographical inequities.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Ending preventable stillbirths is among the core goals of the UN&rsquo;s Global Strategy for Women&rsquo;s, Children&rsquo;s and Adolescents&rsquo; Health (2016&ndash;2030) and the Every Newborn Action Plan (ENAP). These global initiatives aim to reduce the stillbirth rate to 12 or fewer third trimester (late) stillbirths per 1,000 total births in every country by 2030.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The stillbirth rate (SBR) is defined as the number of babies born with no signs of life at 28 weeks or more of gestation, per 1,000 total births. The stillbirth rate is calculated as: SBR = 1000 * {sb/(sb+lb)}, where &#39;sb&#39; refers to the number of stillbirths &ge; 28 weeks or more of gestational age; and &#39;lb&#39; refers to the number of live births regardless of gestational age or birthweight.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> <strong><em>[Shivangini Piplani, who is doing her MA in Finance and Investment (1st year) from Berlin School of Business and Innovation, assisted the Inclusive Media for Change team in preparing the summary of &#39;A Neglected Tragedy: The global burden of stillbirths -- Report of the UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation, 2020.&#39; She did this work as part of her winter internship at the Inclusive Media for Change project in December 2020.]</em></strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> The Sample Registration System (SRS) is carried out by the Office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner, India with the goal of providing accurate annual estimates of birth rates, death rates, child mortality rates and many other indices of pregnancy and fertility and mortality. The SRS has been providing data for the estimation of various mortality measures since its inception. The report provides mortality indices at the national and state levels, as well as death rates at the sub-state, viz. NSS Natural Division Level. &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The key findings of [inside]Sample Registration System Statistical Report 2018 (released in June 2020)[/inside], published by the Office of the Registrar General &amp; Census Commissioner, are as follows (please <a href="/upload/files/SRS_Statistical_Report_2018.pdf"><span style="background-color:#ffffff">click here</span></a> to access):</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Crude Death Rate (CDR)</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Crude Death Rate (CDR), which is defined as the number of deaths in a year per thousand population, at the national level, stood at 6.2 in 2018. It was 6.7 in rural areas and 5.1 in urban areas. For all bigger states/ UTs, except West Bengal, the CDR in rural areas was higher than that in urban areas. For West Bengal, CDR in rural (CDR 5.6) and urban (CDR 5.7) areas were almost identical, which makes the state the closest to the Line of Equity vis-&agrave;-vis other states/ UTs.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; States that exhibited large differences between urban CDR and rural CDR in 2018 were: Telangana (3 points), Punjab (2.6), Tamil Nadu (2.5), Andhra Pradesh (2.4), Karnataka (2.4), Chhattisgarh (2.3 points) and Himachal Pradesh (2.3). The difference is calculated as Rural CDR - Urban CDR = Difference in CDRs.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The top 5 states with the highest CDRs in 2018 were: Chhattisgarh (8.0), Odisha (7.3), Kerala (6.9), Himachal Pradesh (6.9) and Andhra Pradesh (6.7).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Between the periods 2006-08 and 2016-18, the average CDR at the national level changed by &ndash;14.9 percentage points. Between the above-said time points, CDR declined for all states, except Kerala, which showed an increase of 6 percentage points possibly due to the changes in age structure of its population.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Infant Mortality Rate (IMR)</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Infant Mortality Rate (IMR) is defined as the number of infant (less than one year of age) deaths per one thousand live births during the year.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; IMR has seen a substantial decline over the years, from 129 per 1000 live births in 1971 to 110 in 1981 and from 80 in 1991 to 32 in 2018.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; At the national level, IMR was 36.8 in rural areas and 22.9 in urban areas during the period 2016-18. However, IMR was 36 in rural areas and 23 in urban areas in 2018.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2018, Kerala had the lowest IMR of 7 and Madhya Pradesh had the highest IMR of 48.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2018, at the national level, IMR among male infants stood at 32, while that for female infants it was 33.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; For the year 2018, in all states except Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Delhi, Gujarat, Haryana, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Odisha, Punjab, Tamil Nadu, Telangana and Uttarakhand, female infants experienced a higher mortality rate as compared to male infants.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2018, Jharkhand had the highest difference between male IMR (27) and female IMR (34), followed by Bihar with a large difference between male IMR (30) and female IMR (35). As opposed to that, in Madhya Pradesh male IMR (51) exceeded female IMR (46).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2018, Assam witnessed the highest inequity between rural and urban IMRs with its rural IMR at 44 and urban IMR at 20. States like West Bengal (Urban IMR 20, Rural IMR 22), Punjab (Urban IMR 19, Rural IMR 21), Uttarakhand (Urban IMR 29, Rural IMR 31) and Bihar (Urban IMR 30, Rural IMR 32) had the least inequity between rural and urban IMR.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Between 2006-08 and 2016-18, the average IMR declined by -40.3 percent. In rural areas, decline in IMR between the above-said time points ranged from -63.9 percentage points in Delhi to -32.2 percentage points in Chhattisgarh. The highest fall in IMR in urban areas between the above-said time points was noticed in Delhi i.e. -56.4 percent.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Neonatal Mortality Rate</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Neo-natal Mortality Rate (NMR) is defined as the number of infant (less than 29 days) deaths per one thousand live births during the year.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2018, at the national level, NMR was 23, while in rural and urban areas, they were 27 and 14, respectively.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2018, NMR was the lowest in Kerala at 5 and highest in Madhya Pradesh at 35.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; At the national level, the percentage of neo-natal deaths to total infant deaths was 71.7 percent in 2018, and it was 60.1 percent in urban areas and 74.4 percent in rural areas. It means that most infants die when they are not even 30 days old.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Perinatal Mortality Rate</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Peri-natal mortality rate (PMR) is defined as the number of still births and infant deaths of less than 7 days per 1,000 live births (LB) and still births (SB) taken together during the year.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; At the national level, PMR has been estimated to be 22 in 2018. It was 25 in rural areas and 14 in urban areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2018, Madhya Pradesh had the highest PMR at 30 and Kerala had the lowest PMR at 10.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Still Birth Rate</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Still Birth Rate (SBR) is defined as the ratio of the number of still births per one thousand live births and still births taken together.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; At the national level, the SBR has been estimated to be 4 in 2018.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2018, the highest SBR has been estimated for Odisha (10) and lowest have been estimated for Jammu and Kashmir and Jharkhand (i.e. 1 each).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Under-five Mortality Rate (U5MR)</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Under-five Mortality Rate (U5MR) is the probability of dying between birth and exactly age 5, expressed per 1,000 live births.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; At the national level, U5MR has been estimated to be 36 in 2018. In urban areas, the U5MR in 2018 has been estimated to be 26 while in rural areas, it has been estimated to be 40.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Estimated U5MR was the lowest in Kerala at 10 and was the highest in Madhya Pradesh at 56.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; At the national level, female U5MR (37) was higher than the male U5MR (36) in 2018.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2018, female U5MRs were higher than that of male U5MR in all states except in Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Delhi, Gujarat, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Odisha, Punjab, Tamil Nadu and Uttarakhand.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Age-Specific Mortality Rates (ASMR)</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Age-specific Mortality Rate (ASMR), is defined as the number of deaths in a particular age-group per thousand population of the same age-group during the year.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong><em>5-14 Age Group</em></strong><br /> &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;<br /> &bull; At the national level, the ASDR for the 5-14 age group has been estimated to be 0.5 in 2018.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2018, the lowest ASDR for the 5-14 age group was found for Kerala and Assam (0.2 each) and the highest ASDR for the 5-14 age group was observed in case of Bihar, Odisha, Madhya and Chhattisgarh (0.7 each).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; At the national level, although ASDR for the 5-14 age group was the same for males and females in urban areas (0.4 each), ASDR for the 5-14 age group among females was 0.6 and among males was 0.5 in rural areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong><em>15-59 Age Group</em></strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; At the national level, ASDR for the 15-59 age group has been estimated to be 3.2 in rural areas and 2.3 in urban areas. At the national level, the ASDR for the 15-59 age group was 2.9 in 2018.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2018, the female ASDR for the 15-59 age group was lower than that of male ASDR for the 15-59 age group in all the states.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong><em>60 and Above Age Group</em></strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; At the national level, ASDR for the 60 and above age group has been estimated to be 42.6.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; ASDR for the 60 and above age group among males (45.9) was greater than that among females (39.5). The same trend existed for rural and urban areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; ASDR for the 60 and above age group has been estimated to be the highest in Chhattisgarh (58.9) and lowest in Delhi (28.3).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Sex Ratio at Birth (SRB)</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Sex Ratio at Birth (SRB) is defined as the number of female births per 1000 male births during the year.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The 3 years&rsquo; average of SRB (in the period 2016-18) has been estimated to be 899. At the national level, it was 900 in rural areas and 897 in urban areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; For 2016-18, the average SRB was the highest in Chhattisgarh at 958 and it was the lowest in Uttarakhand at 840.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In rural areas, Chhattisgarh had the highest SRB of 976 and Haryana had the lowest SRB of 840 in the period 2016-18. &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In urban areas, Madhya Pradesh had the highest SRB of 968 and Uttarakhand had the lowest SRB at 810 in the period 2016-18.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong><em>[Meghana Myadam and Sakhi Arun Jagdale, who are doing their MA in Development Studies (1st year) from Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Hyderabad, assisted the Inclusive Media for Change team in preparing the summary of the report by the Office of the Registrar General &amp; Census Commissioner<em>.</em> They did this work as part of their summer internship at the Inclusive Media for Change project in July 2020.]</em></strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="/upload/files/FAQ.pdf">click here</a> to access the [inside]FAQ on COVID-19 prepared by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare[/inside].</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="/upload/files/Containment%20Plan%20for%20Large%20Outbreaks%20of%20COVID19%20Final.pdf">click here</a> to access the [inside]Containment Plan for Large Outbreaks Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019[/inside] (COVID-19), which has been prepared by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">---</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/Background-Paper-COVID19.pdf">click here</a> to read the [inside]Background Note on COVID-19[/inside], which was prepared by Jan Swasthya Abhiyan (JSA) and All India People&rsquo;s Science Network(AIPSN), dated 16th March, 2020.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/Statement-COVID19.pdf">click here</a> to read the [inside]Statement on the COVID-19 pandemic[/inside], which was released by Jan Swasthya Abhiyan (JSA) and All India People&rsquo;s Science Network(AIPSN) on 16th March, 2020.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">---</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/High%20Level%20group%20of%20Health%20Sector.pdf" title="High Level group of Health Sector">click here</a> to access the Report of the [inside]High Level Group on Health Sector (2019), submitted to the Fifteenth Finance Commission of India[/inside]. The members of the High Level Group on Health were Dr. Randeep Guleria, Dr. Devi Shetty, Dr. Dileep Govind Mhaisekar, Dr. Naresh Trehan, Dr. Bhabatosh Biswas and Prof. K Srinath Reddy.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">---</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Press%20Note%20NSS%2075th%20Round%20Report%20Key%20Indicators%20of%20Social%20Consumption%20in%20India%20Health%20July%202017%20to%20June%202018%20released%20on%2023rd%20November%202019.pdf" title="Press Note NSS 75th Round Report Key Indicators of Social Consumption in India Health July 2017 to June 2018 released on 23rd November 2019">click here</a> to access the major findings of [inside]NSS 75th Round Report: Key Indicators of Social Consumption in India: Health, July 2017 to June 2018 (released on 23rd November 2019)[/inside].<br /> <br /> Kindly <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Key%20Indicators%20of%20Social%20Consumption%20in%20India%20Health.pdf" title="Key Indicators of Social Consumption in India Health">click here</a> to access the NSS 75th Round Report: Key Indicators of Social Consumption in India: Health, July 2017 to June 2018 (released on 23rd November 2019).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <div style="text-align:justify">The key findings of the [inside]2019 India TB report (released in September 2019)[/inside], which has been produced by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, are as follows (please <a href="https://tbcindia.gov.in/WriteReadData/India%20TB%20Report%202019.pdf">click here</a> and <a href="https://tbcindia.gov.in/index1.php?lang=1&amp;level=1&amp;sublinkid=4160&amp;lid=2807">click here</a> to access):</div> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> &bull; The country accounted for a quarter of the global tuberculosis (TB) burden with an estimated 27 lakh cases in 2018.<br /> <br /> &bull; In 2018, the country was able to achieve a total notification of 21.5 lakh TB cases, of which 25 percent was from private sector. Majority of the TB burden is among the working age group. Nearly 89 percent of TB cases came from the age group 15-69 years. About two-third of the TB patients were males.<br /> <br /> &bull; Among the notified, treatment was initiated for about 19.1 lakh cases (almost 90 percent), across both public and private sectors.<br /> <br /> &bull; HIV co-infection among TB patient was nearly fifty thousand cases amounting to TB-HIV co-infection rate of 3.4 percent.<br /> <br /> &bull; In 2018, TB notification has increased to 5.37 lakhs. This is an increase by 35 percent in notification from private sector in comparison to 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; Based on private drug sales data, it could be said that in 2016 there was about 1.59 times patients in the private sector as compared to the public sector (approximately 22.7 lakh patients in total).<br /> <br /> &bull; In India about 80 percent of the outpatient care is provided by private health care providers. Considering the quantum of private sector, it necessitates to leverage their capacity to expand health coverage.<br /> <br /> &bull; TB is a notifiable disease vide 2012 as per declaration of Government of India Order. This has expanded the ambit of TB surveillance covering all public as well as private health facilities. The healthcare providers shall notify every TB cases to local authorities such as District Health Officers/ Chief Medical Officers of a district and Municipal Health Officer of a municipal corporation. This notification should be done every month. The surveillance begins with the notification, and completed with acting on the information gathered. In <a href="tinymce/uploaded/TB%20notification%20Gazette%20of%20India%20dated%2019%20March%202018.pdf" title="TB notification Gazette of India dated 19 March 2018">March 2018</a>, the notification was published in Gazette of India, making it mandatory for private providers to notify TB patients and public health system to act upon it.<br /> <br /> &bull; Uttar Pradesh, with 17 percent of population of the country, is the largest contributor to TB cases, with 20 percent of the total notifications, accounting for about 4.2 lakh cases (187 cases per lakh population).<br /> <br /> &bull; Delhi and Chandigarh stand apart from all other states and UTs with regard to notification rates relative to their resident population. Annual notification rates in Delhi and Chandigarh were 504 cases per lakh population and 496 cases per lakh population, respectively. This is because patients residing in other parts of the country are diagnosed/ notified from these two UTs.<br /> <br /> &bull; In 2018, the Revised National Tuberculosis Control Programme (RNTCP) notified 21.5 lakh TB cases, a 16 percent increase over 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; The largest ever National Drug Resistance Survey in the world for 13 anti-TB drugs has been completed and it has indicated about 6.2 percent prevalence of drug resistant TB in the country among all TB patients.<br /> <br /> &bull; The Government of India is prioritising resource allocations for TB in the country with more than Rs. 12,000 crores being invested in the implementation of the National Strategic Plan to End TB 2017-2025. The government has started the Nikshay Poshan Yojana (NPY) for nutritional support to TB patients.&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; It is expected that the country would be able to cover all TB cases through the online notification system -- NIKSHAY.<br /> &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The ending preventable maternal mortality (EPMM) target for reducing the global maternal mortality ratio (MMRatio) by 2030 was adopted as Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) target 3.1: reduce global MMRatio to less than 70 per lakh live births by 2030. Having targets for mortality reduction is important, but accurate measurement of maternal mortality remains challenging and many deaths still go uncounted. Many countries still lack well-functioning civil registration and vital statistics (CRVS) systems, and where such systems do exist, reporting errors &ndash; whether incompleteness (unregistered deaths, also known as &ldquo;missing&rdquo;) or misclassification of cause of death &ndash; continue to pose a major challenge to data accuracy. The report entitled &#39;Trends in Maternal Mortality 2000 to 2017: Estimates by World Health Orgnization (WHO), United Nations Children&#39;s Fund (UNICEF), World Bank Group, United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) and the United Nations Population Division presents internationally comparable global, regional and country-level estimates and trends for maternal mortality between 2000 and 2017.<br /> <br /> The new estimates presented in this report supersede all previously published estimates for years that fall within the same time period. Care should be taken to use only these estimates for the interpretation of trends in maternal mortality from 2000 to 2017; due to modifications in methodology and data availability, differences between these and previous estimates should not be interpreted as representing time trends. In addition, when interpreting changes in MMRatios over time, one should take into consideration that it is easier to reduce the MMRatio when the level is high than when the MMRatio level is already low.<br /> <br /> Please note that Maternal Mortality Ratio is the number of women who die&nbsp; from pregnancy-related causes while pregnant or within 42 days of pregnancy termination per 100,000 live births.<br /> <br /> The key findings of the report entitled [inside]Trends in Maternal Mortality 2000 to 2017: Estimates by WHO, UNICEF, World Bank Group, UNFPA and the United Nations Population Division (released in September 2019)[/inside] are as follows (please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Maternal%20mortality%20Levels%20and%20trends%202000%20to%202017%20Executive%20Summary.pdf" title="Maternal mortality Levels and trends 2000 to 2017 Executive Summary">click here</a> and <a href="https://www.unfpa.org/featured-publication/trends-maternal-mortality-2000-2017">click here</a> to access):&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; Nigeria and India had the highest estimated numbers of maternal deaths, accounting for approximately one-third (35 percent) of estimated&nbsp; global maternal deaths in 2017, with approximately 67,000 and 35,000 maternal deaths (23 percent and 12 percent of global maternal deaths), respectively.<br /> <br /> &bull; Maternal Mortality Ratio for India was 370 in 2000, 286 in 2005, 210 in&nbsp; 2010, 158 in 2015 and 145 in 2017. So, the MMRatio for the country reduced by almost 61 percent between 2000 and 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; MMRatio for China was 59 in 2000, 44 in 2005, 36 in 2010, 30 in 2015 and 29 in 2017. Hence, the MMRatio for China reduced by around 51 percent between 2000 and 2017.&nbsp;&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; The absolute difference in MMRatio between India and China has lessened from 311 in 2000 to 116 in 2017. The country&#39;s MMRatio&nbsp; was 6.3 times that of China in 2000, which has reduced to 5 times in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; MMRatio for Bangladesh was 434 in 2000, 343 in 2005, 258 in 2010, 200 in 2015 and 173 in 2017. Therefore, the MMRatio for Bangladesh decreased by nearly 60 percent between 2000 and 2017.&nbsp;&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; The absolute gap in MMRatio between Bangladesh and India has reduced from 64 in 2000 to 28 in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; MMRatio for Sri Lanka was 56 in 2000, 45 in 2005, 38 in 2010, 36 in 2015 and 36 in 2017. So, the MMRatio for Sri Lanka reduced by roughly 36 percent between 2000 and 2017.&nbsp;&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; MMRatio for Pakistan was 286 in 2000, 237 in 2005, 191 in 2010, 154 in 2015 and 140 in 2017. Therefore, the MMRatio for Pakistan declined by roughly 51 percent between 2000 and 2017.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; MMRatio for South Asia was 395 in 2000, 309 in 2005, 235 in 2010, 179 in 2015 and 163 in 2017. Hence, the MMRatio for South Asia reduced by around 59 percent between 2000 and 2017.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Sub-Saharan Africa and Southern Asia accounted for approximately 86 percent (2,54,000) of the estimated global maternal deaths in 2017 with sub-Saharan Africa alone accounting for roughly 66 percent (1,96,000), while Southern Asia accounted for nearly 20 percent (58,000). South-Eastern Asia, in addition, accounted for over 5 percent of global maternal deaths (16,000).<br /> &nbsp;&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to the [inside]National Health Profile 2018, 13th Issue[/inside], Central Bureau of Health Intelligence, Ministry of Health &amp; Family Welfare (please <a href="https://im4change.org/docs/900National%20Health%20Profile%202018%2013th%20Issue%20Central%20Bureau%20of%20Health%20Intelligence%20Ministry%20of%20Health%20&amp;%20Family%20Welfare.pdf">click here</a> to access):<br /> <br /> <strong>Demographic Indicators</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; The Infant Mortality Rate (IMR) per 1,000 live births has declined considerably from 74 infant deaths in 1994 to 34 infant deaths in 2016. There is a huge gap between IMR in rural areas (38 infant deaths per 1,000 live births) and urban areas (23 infant deaths per 1000 live births).<br /> <br /> &bull; Among the states, the lowest IMR per 1,000 live births in 2016 was found in Goa (8), followed by Kerala (10) and Manipur (11). The highest IMR per 1,000 live births in 2015 was found in Madhya Pradesh (47), followed by both Assam and Odisha (44 each).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The life expectancy of life at birth has increased from 49.7 years in 1970-75 to 68.3 years in 2011-15. In the period 2011-15, the life expectancy for females was 70.0 years and 66.9 years for males.<br /> <br /> &bull; In the period 2011-15, the life expectancy in the rural areas was 67.1 years and in the urban areas it was 71.9 years.<br /> <br /> &bull; The Maternal Mortality Ratio (MMRatio) per 1,00,000 livebirths has decreased from 178 maternal deaths during 2010-12 to 167 maternal deaths during 2011-13. In 2011-13, the MMRatio per 1,00,000 livebirths was the highest in Assam i.e. 300 maternal deaths and lowest in Kerala i.e. 61 maternal deaths.<br /> <br /> &bull; The country&#39;s birth rate per 1,000 estimated mid-year population has fallen from 29.5 livebirths in 1991 to 20.4 livebirths in 2016. Birth rate per 1,000 estimated mid-year population in rural areas was 22.1 livebirths and in urban areas it was 17.0 livebirths in 2016.<br /> <br /> &bull; India&#39;s natural growth rate per 1,000 mid-year population has declined from 19.7 in 1991 to 14.0 in 2016.<br /> <br /> &bull; The proportion of urban population to India&#39;s total population has increased from 25.7 percent in 1991 to 27.81 percent in 2001, and further increased to 31.14 in 2011.<br /> <br /> &bull; The country&#39;s population density has increased from 267 persons per square kilometer in 1991 to 325 persons per square kilometer in 2001, and further rose to 382 persons per square kilometer in 2011.<br /> <br /> &bull; The decadal growth rate of India&#39;s population has fallen from 23.87 percent in 1981-1991 to 21.54 percent in 1991-2001, and further declined to 17.7 percent in 2001-2011.<br /> <br /> <strong>Health Status Indicators</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; In 2017, maximum number of malaria cases was reported in Odisha (3,52,140 cases) and maximum number of deaths was reported in West Bengal (29 deaths).<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of cases of malaria has changed from 8,81,730 in 2013 to 8,42,095 in 2017. The total number of deaths due to malaria has changed from 440 in 2013 to 104 in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; Out of the overall cases of Kala-azar reported in 2017, 72 percent of the cases were reported in Bihar. The total number of cases of Kala-azar has fallen from 13,869 in 2013 to 5,758 in 2017. Likewise, the total number of deaths from Kala-azar has fallen from 20 in 2013 to zero in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; There has been a considerable fall in the number of swine flu cases/ deaths in the year 2014 (viz. 937) as compared with 2012 (viz. 5,044) &amp; 2013 (viz. 5,253). However, the number of cases (42,592) and deaths (2,990) have drastically increased in the year 2015. In 2016, the cases decreased to 1786 and again increased to 38,811 in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; A total of 63,679 cases of chikungunya were reported in 2017 as compared with 64,057 cases in 2016. Most chikungunya cases in 2017 were reported from Karnataka (32,170), followed by Gujarat (7,807) and Maharashtra (7,639).<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of cases and deaths due to chicken pox were 74,035 and 92, respectively in 2017. Kerala accounted for maximum number of cases (30,941) and West Bengal accounted for maximum number of deaths (53) due to chicken pox in 2017.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of cases of Acute Encephalitis Syndrome has increased from 7,825 in 2013 to 13,036 in 2017. The total number of deaths due to Acute Encephalitis Syndrome has decreased from 1,273 in 2013 to 1,010 in 2017. Uttar Pradesh reported maximum numbers of cases (4,749) and maximum number of deaths (593) in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of cases of Japanese Encephalitis has almost doubled from 1,086 in 2013 to 2,180 in 2017. The total number of deaths due to Japanese Encephalitis has increased from 202 in 2013 to 252 in 2017. Uttar Pradesh reported maximum numbers of cases (693) and maximum number of deaths (93) in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of cases and deaths due to encephalitis were 12,485 and 626, respectively in 2017. Assam accounted for maximum number of cases (5,525) and Uttar Pradesh accounted for maximum number of deaths (246) due to chicken pox in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of cases and deaths due to viral meningitis were 7,559 and 121, respectively in 2017. Andhra Pradesh accounted for maximum number of cases (1,493) and maximum number of deaths (33) due to viral meningitis in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of cases of dengue has almost doubled from 75,808 in 2013 to 1,57,996 in 2017. The total number of deaths due to dengue has increased from 193 in 2013 to 253 in 2017. Tamil Nadu reported maximum numbers of cases (23,294) and maximum number of deaths (65) in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; As per the National Programme for Prevention and Control of Cancer, Diabetes, Cardiovascular Diseases and Stroke (NPCDCS), out of 3,57,23,660 patients who attended non-communicable disease (NCD) clinics in 2017, 8.41 percent people are diagnosed with diabetes, 10.22 percent are diagnosed with hypertension (high blood pressure), 0.37% are diagnosed with cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), 0.13 percent are diagnosed with stroke and 0.11 percent are diagnosed with common cancers (including oral, cervical and breast cancer).<br /> <br /> &bull; During the year 2015, the lives of 4,13,457 and 1,33,623 people are cut short as a result of accidental and suicide cases, respectively. Many more people suffer non-fatal injuries, with many incurring a disability as a result of their injury.<br /> <br /> &bull; Suicide rates are increasing significantly for young adults including male, female &amp; transgender in a wider population. The maximum number of suicide cases (44,593) is reported between the age-group 30-45 years.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of disabled persons in India is 26,814,994 as per the Census 2011.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of cases and deaths due to snake bite were 1,42,366 and 948 respectively in 2017.<br /> <br /> <strong>Health Financing in India</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; The total public expenditure on health for the year 2015-16 stood at Rs 1.4 lakh crores (actual).<br /> <br /> &bull; The per capita public expenditure (actual) on health in nominal terms has gone up from Rs. 621 in 2009-10 to Rs. 1,112 in 2015-16.<br /> <br /> &bull; Public expenditure on health (includes health sector expenditure by Centre and States/UTs) as a percentage of GDP was 1.02 percent in 2015-16. There is no significant change in public expenditure on health as a percentage of GDP since 2009-10.<br /> <br /> &bull; The Centre-State share in total public expenditure on health was 31:69 in 2015-16, which used to be 36:64 in 2009-10.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total public expenditure on health (excluding other Central Ministries) in 2015-16 was Rs. 1,40,054 crores, with Medical and Public Health comprising the major share (78.7 percent). The share of Family Welfare was 12.6 percent.<br /> <br /> &bull; Urban and rural health services constituted 71 percent of the public expenditure on medical and public health in 2015-16.<br /> <br /> &bull; The North-Eastern states had the highest (viz. Rs. 2,878 per capita) and Empowered Action Group (EAG) states (including Assam) had the lowest (viz. Rs. 871 per capita) average per capita public expenditure on health in 2015-16 (excluding UTs). For example, in Mizoram the per capita health expenditure was Rs. 5862 (actual) in 2015-16. However, in Bihar, the per capita health expenditure was Rs. 491 (actual) in 2015-16.<br /> <br /> &bull; The North-Eastern states had the highest public health expenditure as a percentage of Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP) in 2015-16 (2.76 percent). Public health expenditure as a percentage of GSDP stood at 1.36 percent for EAG states (including Assam) and 0.76 percent for major non-EAG states.<br /> <br /> &bull; Based on the Health Survey (71st round) conducted by National Sample Service Office (NSSO), the average medical expenditure incurred during stay at hospital between January, 2013 and June, 2014 was Rs. 14,935 for rural and Rs. 24,436 for urban India.<br /> <br /> &bull; The average total medical expenditure per child birth as in-patient over the last 365 days (survey conducted from January to June 2014) in a public hospital in rural areas was Rs. 1,587 and in urban areas is Rs. 2,117.<br /> <br /> &bull; Around 43 crore individuals were covered under any health insurance in the year 2016-17. This amounts to 34 percent of the total population of India. Almost 79 percent of them were covered by public insurance companies.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; Overall, 77 percent of all persons covered with insurance fall under Government-sponsored schemes.<br /> <br /> &bull; Public insurance companies had a higher share of coverage and premium for all types of health insurance policies, except family floater policies including individual policies.<br /> <br /> &bull; Compared to countries that have either Universal Health Coverage or moving towards it, India&rsquo;s per capita public spending on health is low.<br /> <br /> <strong>Human Resources in Health Sector</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; The number of registered allopathic doctors possessing recognized medical qualifications (under Indian Medical Council Act) and registered with state medical council for the years 2016 and 2017 were 25,282 and 17,982, respectively. Upto 2017, the total number of doctors possessing recognised medical qualifications (under the IMC Act) registered with the State Medical Councils/ Medical Council of India is 10,41,395.&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; In 2017, the average population served per government allopathic doctor was 11,082. The state having the highest average population served per government allopathic doctor in 2017 was Bihar (28,391), followed by Uttar Pradesh (19,962) and Jharkhand (18,518).&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; In 2017, the average population served per government dental surgeon was 1,76,004. The state having the highest average population served per government dental surgeon in 2017 was Chhattisgarh (25,87,900), followed by Maharashtra (14,83,150) and Uttar Pradesh (11,41,869).<br /> <br /> &bull; The number of dental surgeon registered with Central/ State Dental Councils of India has increased from 93,332 in 2008 to 2,51,207 as on 31st December, 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; Over the years with gaining popularity, there is a steady rise in total number of registered AYUSH doctors in India from 7,71,468 in 2016 to 7,73,668 in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; There was a total of 8,41,279 Auxilliary Nurse Midwives (ANMs) serving in the country as on 31st December, 2016.<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 31st December, 2016, the highest number of registered ANMs among the states were found in Andhra Pradesh (1,38,435), followed by Rajasthan (1,08,688) and Odisha (62,159).<br /> <br /> &bull; There are 19,80,536 Registered Nurses and Registered Midwives (RN &amp; RM) and 56,367 Lady Health Visitors (LHV) serving in the country as on 31st December, 2016.<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 31st December, 2016, the highest number of registered RN &amp; RM among the states were found in Tamil Nadu (2,62,718), followed by Kerala (2,46,161) and Andhra Pradesh (2,32,621).<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 13th November, 2017, the total number of registered pharmacists operating in the country is 9,07,132.<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 13th November, 2017, the highest number of registered pharmacists among the states were found in Maharashtra (2,03,089), followed by Gujarat (1,19,445) and Andhra Pradesh (1,15,754).<br /> <br /> &bull; In rural areas, the total number of allopathic doctors at primary health centres (PHCs) was 27,124 as on 31st March, 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 31st March, 2017, among the states, the highest number of allopathic doctors at PHCs was found in Maharashtra (2,929), followed by Tamil Nadu (2,759) and Rajasthan (2,382).<br /> <br /> &bull; In rural areas, the total number of specialists at community health centres (CHCs) is 4,156 as on 31st March, 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 31st March, 2017, among the states, the highest number of specialists at CHCs is found in Maharashtra (508), followed by Karnataka (498) and Rajasthan (497).<br /> <br /> <strong>Health Infrastructure</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; Medical education infrastructures in the country have shown rapid growth during the last 26 years. The country has 476 medical colleges, 313 dental colleges for Bachelor of Dental Surgery (BDS) &amp; 249 dental colleges for Master of Dental Surgery (MDS). There has been a total admission of 52,646 in 476 Medical Colleges and 27,060 in BDS and 6,233 in MDS during 2017-18.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of dental colleges for BDS has increased from 77 in 1994-95 to 313 in 2017-18 viz. by 4.1 times. The total number of dental colleges for MDS has increased from 32 in 1994-95 to 249 in 2017-18 viz. by 7.8 times.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of admission in dental colleges for BDS has risen from 1,987 in 1994-95 to 27,060 in 2017-18 viz. by 13.6 times. The total number of admission in dental colleges for MDS has risen from 225 in 1994-95 to 6,233 in 2017-18 viz. 27.7 times.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of medical colleges in India has increased from 146 in 1991-92 to 476 in 2017-18 viz. by 3.3 times.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of male students taking admissions in medical colleges has gone up from 7,468 in 1991-92 to 26,082 in 2017-18 viz. by 3.5 times. The total number of female students taking admissions in medical colleges has gone up from 4,731 in 1991-92 to 26,564 in 2017-18 viz. by 5.6 times.<br /> <br /> &bull; India has 3,215 institutions producing 1,29,926 General Nurse Midwives annually and 777 colleges for Pharmacy (Diploma) with an intake capacity of 46,795 as on 31st October, 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; There are 23,582 government hospitals having 7,10,761 beds in the country. It means that there is just one bed for 1,826 Indians in government hospitals, assuming that the projected population in 2018 being 129,80,41,000 as on 1st March, 2018.<br /> <br /> &bull; Around 19,810 government hospitals are in rural areas with 2,79,588 beds and 3,772 government hospitals are in urban areas with 4,31,173 beds.<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 31st March, 2017, there were 1,56,231 sub-centres, 25,650 primary health centres (PHCs) and 5,624 community health centres (CHCs).<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 31st March, 2017, most sub-centres were found in Uttar Pradesh (20,521), followed by Rajasthan (14,406) and Maharashtra (10,580).&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 31st March, 2017, most PHCs were found in Uttar Pradesh (3,621), followed by Karnataka (2,359) and Rajasthan (2,079).&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 31st March, 2017, most CHCs were found in Uttar Pradesh (822), followed by Rajasthan (579) and Tamil Nadu (385).<br /> <br /> &bull; Medical care facilities under AYUSH by management status i.e. dispensaries &amp; hospitals were 27,698 and 3,943 respectively, as on 1st April, 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of licensed blood banks in the country till June, 2017 was 2,903. The highest number of blood banks are found in Maharashtra (328), followed by Uttar Pradesh (294) and Tamil Nadu (291).&nbsp;&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; In total, there were 469 eye banks (362 privately run and 107 government run) in the country as on 4th January, 2018. Most eye banks were found in Maharashtra (166), followed by Karnataka (39) and Madhya Pradesh (36).<br /> <br /> <strong>Achievement of health-related SDGs targets</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; On most targets pertaining to health-related Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), India lags behind the target. For example, although the target for coverage of essential health services is 100 percent (indicator no. 3.8.1), in our country only 57 percent of the population is covered by such services. Similarly, although the target for Maternal Mortality Ratio (per 1,00,000 live births) is 70 by 2030 (indicator no. 3.1.1), MMRatio in India presently is 174.<br /> <br /> &bull; The target for Under-five mortality rate (per 1000 live births) is 25 by 2030 (indicator no. 3.2.1). However, U5MR in the country is 47.7.<br /> <br /> &bull; In case of many SDG-related indicators such as Suicide mortality rate (per 100,000 population) (indicator no. 3.4.2) or say Adolescent birth rate (per 1000 women aged 15-19 years) (indicator no. 3.7.2), the SDG target is yet to be determined.<br /> <br /> &bull; For many SDG-related indicators such as Hepatitis B incidence (indicator no. 3.3.4) or say Proportion of the population with access to affordable medicines and vaccines on a sustainable basis (indicator no. 3.b.1), the data for India is either not provided or remain unavailable.<br /> <br /> <strong>Table: Current Status of Health-related Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Target - Indian Scenario</strong><br /> <br /> <img alt="SDGs" src="tinymce/uploaded/SDGs_1.jpg" style="height:242px; width:334px" /><br /> <br /> <em><strong>Source:</strong> Monitoring Health in the Sustainable Development Goals: 2017, World Health Organization, Regional Office for South East Asia, as quoted in the National Health Profile 2018, please <a href="https://bit.ly/2MmfuuK">click here</a> to access, page no. 288<br /> <br /> Report of the Inter-Agency and Expert Group on Sustainable Development Goal Indicators (E/CN.3/2016/2/Rev.1), please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Final%20list%20of%20SDG%20indicators.pdf">click here</a> to access </em><br /> <br /> <br /> &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">While state-level trends for some important health indicators have been available in India, a comprehensive assessment of the diseases causing the most premature deaths and disability in each state, the risk factors responsible for this burden, and their time trends have not been available in a single standardised framework. The India State-level Disease Burden Initiative was launched in October 2015 to address this crucial knowledge gap with support from the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare of the Government of India. This is a collaborative effort between the Indian Council of Medical Research, Public Health Foundation of India, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, and experts and stakeholders from about 100 institutions across India. The work of this Initiative is overseen by an Advisory Board consisting of eminent policymakers and involves extensive engagement of 14 domain expert groups with the estimation process. Based on intense work over two years, this report describes the distribution and trends of diseases and risk factors for every state of India from 1990 to 2016.<br /> <br /> The estimates were produced as part of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. The analytical methods of this study have been standardised over two decades of scientific work, which has been reported in over 16,000 peer-reviewed publications, making it the most widely used approach globally for disease burden estimation. These methods enable standardised comparisons of health loss caused by different diseases and risk factors, between geographic units, sexes, and age groups, and over time in a unified framework. The key metric used for this comparison is disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), which is the sum of the number of years of life lost due to premature death and a weighted measure of the years lived with disability due to a disease or injury. The use of DALYs to track disease burden is recommended by India&rsquo;s National Health Policy of 2017.<br /> <br /> It is to be noted that attributable burden is the share of the burden of a disease that can be estimated to occur due to exposure to a particular risk factor.<br /> <br /> According to the report entitled [inside]India: Health of the Nation&rsquo;s States - The India State-Level Disease Burden Initiative, Disease Burden Trends in the States of India 1990 to 2016 (released in October, 2017) [/inside], prepared by Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), Public Health Foundation of India (PHFI), Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) and Ministry of Health &amp; Family Welfare (MoHFW), please <a href="https://im4change.org/docs/11592India_Health_of.pdf">click here</a> to access:<br /> <br /> <em>Health status improving, but major inequalities between states</em><br /> <br /> &bull; Life expectancy at birth improved in India from 59.7 years in 1990 to 70.3 years in 2016 for females, and from 58.3 years to 66.9 years for males. There were, however, continuing inequalities between states, with a range of 66.8 years in Uttar Pradesh to 78.7 years in Kerala for females, and from 63.6 years in Assam to 73.8 years in Kerala for males in 2016.<br /> <br /> &bull; The per person disease burden measured as DALYs rate dropped by 36 percent from 1990 to 2016 in India, after adjusting for the changes in the population age structure during this period. But there was an almost two-fold difference in this disease burden rate between the states in 2016, with Assam, Uttar Pradesh, and Chhattisgarh having the highest rates, and Kerala and Goa the lowest rates.<br /> <br /> &bull; While the disease burden rate in India has improved since 1990, it was 72 percent higher per person than in Sri Lanka or China in 2016.<br /> <br /> &bull; The under-5 mortality rate has reduced substantially from 1990 in all states, but there was a four-fold difference in this rate between the highest in Assam and Uttar Pradesh as compared with the lowest in Kerala in 2016, highlighting the vast health inequalities between the states.<br /> <br /> <em>Large differences between states in the changing disease profile</em><br /> <br /> &bull; Of the total disease burden in India measured as DALYs, 61 percent was due to communicable, maternal, neonatal, and nutritional diseases (termed infectious and associated diseases in this summary for simplicity) in 1990, which dropped to 33 percent in 2016.<br /> <br /> &bull; There was a corresponding increase in the contribution of non-communicable diseases from 30 percent of the total disease burden in 1990 to 55 percent in 2016, and of injuries from 9 percent to 12 percent.<br /> <br /> &bull; Infectious and associated diseases made up the majority of disease burden in most of the states in 1990, but this was less than half in all states in 2016. However, the year when infectious and associated diseases transitioned to less than half of the total disease burden ranged from 1986 to 2010 for the various state groups in different stages of this transition.<br /> <br /> &bull; The wide variations between the states in this epidemiological transition are reflected in the range of the contribution of major disease groups to the total disease burden in 2016: 48 percent to 75 percent for non-communicable diseases, 14 percent to 43 percent for infectious and associated diseases, and 9 percent to 14 percent for injuries. Kerala, Goa, and Tamil Nadu have the largest dominance of non-communicable diseases and injuries over infectious and associated diseases, whereas this dominance is present but relatively the lowest in Bihar, Jharkhand, Uttar Pradesh, and Rajasthan.<br /> <br /> &bull; It is to be noted that epidemiological transition level (ETL) is based on the ratio of the number of DALYs in a population due to communicable, maternal, neonatal, and nutritional diseases to the number of DALYs due to non-communicable diseases and injuries together. A decreasing ratio indicates advancing epidemiological transition with an increasing relative burden from non-communicable diseases as compared with communicable, maternal, neonatal, and nutritional diseases.<br /> <br /> &bull; The major EAG states of Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh both have a relatively lower level of development indicators and are at a similar less advanced epidemiological transition stage. However, Uttar Pradesh had 50 percent higher disease burden per person from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 54 percent higher burden from tuberculosis, and 30 percent higher burden from diarrhoeal diseases, whereas Madhya Pradesh had 76% higher disease burden per person from stroke. The cardiovascular risks were generally higher in Madhya Pradesh, and the unsafe water and sanitation risk was relatively higher in Uttar Pradesh.<br /> <br /> &bull; The two North-East India states of Manipur and Tripura are both at a lower-middle stage of epidemiological transition but have quite different disease burden rates from specific leading diseases. Tripura had 49% higher per person burden from ischaemic heart disease, 52 percent higher from stroke, 64 percent higher from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 159 percent higher from iron-deficiency anaemia, 59 percent higher from lower respiratory infections, and 56 percent higher from neonatal disorders. Manipur, on the other hand, had 88 percent higher per person burden from tuberculosis and 38 percent higher from road injuries. Regarding the level of risks, child and maternal malnutrition, air pollution, and several of the cardiovascular risks were higher in Tripura.<br /> <br /> &bull; The two adjoining north Indian states of Himachal Pradesh and Punjab both have a relatively higher level of development indicators and are at a similar more advanced epidemiological transition stage. However, there were striking differences between them in the level of burden from specific leading diseases. Punjab had 157 percent higher per person burden from diabetes, 134 percent higher burden from ischaemic heart disease, 49 percent higher burden from stroke, and 56 percent higher burden from road injuries. On the other hand, Himachal Pradesh had 63 percent higher per person burden from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Consistent with these findings, Punjab had substantially higher levels of cardiovascular risks than Himachal Pradesh.<br /> <br /> <em>Rising burden of non-communicable diseases in all states</em><br /> <br /> &bull; The contribution of most of the major non-communicable disease groups to the total disease burden has increased all over India since 1990, including cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, chronic respiratory diseases, mental health and neurological disorders, cancers, musculoskeletal disorders, and chronic kidney disease.<br /> <br /> &bull; Among the leading non-communicable diseases, the largest disease burden or DALY rate increase from 1990 to 2016 was observed for diabetes, at 80 percent, and ischaemic heart disease, at 34 percent. In 2016, three of the five leading individual causes of disease burden in India were non-communicable, with ischaemic heart disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as the top two causes and stroke as the fifth leading cause.<br /> <br /> &bull; The range of disease burden or DALY rate among the states in 2016 was 9 fold for ischaemic heart disease, 4 fold for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and 6 fold for stroke, and 4 fold for diabetes across India. While ischaemic heart disease and diabetes generally had higher DALY rates in states that are at a more advanced epidemiological transition stage toward non-communicable diseases, the DALY rates of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were generally higher in the EAG states that are at a relatively less advanced epidemiological transition stage.<br /> <br /> &bull; The DALY rates of stroke varied across the states without any consistent pattern in relation to the stage of epidemiological transition. This variety of trends of the different major non-communicable diseases indicates that policy and health system interventions to tackle their increasing burden have to be informed by the specific trends in each state.<br /> <br /> <em>Infectious and associated diseases reducing, but still high in many states</em><br /> <br /> &bull; The burden of most infectious and associated diseases reduced in India from 1990 to 2016, but five of the ten individual leading causes of disease burden in India in 2016 still belonged to this group: diarrhoeal diseases, lower respiratory infections, iron-deficiency anaemia, preterm birth complications, and tuberculosis.<br /> <br /> &bull; The burden caused by these conditions generally continues to be much higher in the Empowered Action Group (EAG) and North-East state groups than in the other states, but there were notable variations between the states within these groups as well.<br /> <br /> &bull; One should noted that the Empowered Action Group (EAG) states is a group of eight states that receive special development effort attention from the Government of India, namely, Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Odisha, Rajasthan, Uttarakhand, and Uttar Pradesh.<br /> <br /> &bull; For India as whole, the disease burden or DALY rate for diarrhoeal diseases, iron-deficiency anaemia, and tuberculosis was 2.5 to 3.5 times higher than the average globally for other geographies at a similar level of development, indicating that this burden can be brought down substantially.<br /> <br /> <em>Increasing but variable burden of injuries among states</em><br /> <br /> &bull; The contribution of injuries to the total disease burden has increased in most states since 1990. The highest proportion of disease burden due to injuries is in young adults. Road injuries and self-harm, which includes suicides and non-fatal outcomes of self-harm, are the leading contributors to the injury burden in India.<br /> <br /> &bull; The range of disease burden or DALY rate varied 3 fold for road injuries and 6 fold for self-harm among the states of India in 2016.<br /> <br /> &bull; The burden due to road injuries was much higher in males than in females. The DALY rate for self-harm for India as a whole was 1.8 times higher than the average globally for other geographies at a similar level of development in 2016.<br /> <br /> <em>Rising risks for cardiovascular diseases and diabetes</em><br /> <br /> &bull; Of the total disease burden in India in 1990, a tenth was caused by a group of risks including unhealthy diet, high blood pressure, high blood sugar, high cholesterol, and overweight, which mainly contribute to ischaemic heart disease, stroke, and diabetes. The contribution of this group of risks increased massively to a quarter of the total disease burden in India in 2016.<br /> <br /> &bull; The combination of these risks was highest in Punjab, Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Andhra Pradesh, and Maharashtra in 2016, but importantly, the contribution of these risks has increased in every state of the country since 1990.<br /> <br /> &bull; The other significant contributor to cardiovascular diseases and diabetes, as well as to cancers and some other diseases, is tobacco use, which was responsible for 6% of the total disease burden in India in 2016. All of these risks are generally higher in males than in females.<br /> <br /> <em>Unacceptably high risk of child and maternal malnutrition</em><br /> <br /> &bull; While the disease burden due to child and maternal malnutrition has dropped in India substantially since 1990, this is still the single largest risk factor, responsible for 15% of the total disease burden in India in 2016. This burden is highest in the major EAG states and Assam, and is higher in females than in males.<br /> <br /> &bull; Child and maternal malnutrition contributes to disease burden mainly through increasing the risk of neonatal disorders, nutritional deficiencies, diarrhoeal diseases, lower respiratory infections, and other common infections.<br /> <br /> &bull; As a stark contrast, the disease burden due to child and maternal malnutrition in India was 12 times higher per person than in China in 2016. Kerala had the lowest burden due to this risk among the Indian states, but even this was 2.7 times higher per person than in China.<br /> <br /> <em>Unsafe water and sanitation improving, but not enough yet</em><br /> <br /> &bull; Unsafe water and sanitation was the second leading risk responsible for disease burden in India in 1990, but dropped to the seventh leading risk in 2016, contributing 5 percent of the total disease burden, mainly through diarrhoeal diseases and other infections.<br /> <br /> &bull; Risk factors means potentially modifiable causes of disease and injury.<br /> <br /> &bull; The burden due to this risk is also highest in several EAG states and Assam, and higher in females than in males. The improvement in exposure to this risk from 1990 to 2016 was least in the EAG states, indicating that higher focus is needed in these states for more rapid improvements.<br /> <br /> &bull; The per person disease burden due to unsafe water and sanitation was 40 times higher in India than in China in 2016.<br /> <br /> <em>Household air pollution improving, outdoor air pollution worsening</em><br /> <br /> &bull; The contribution of air pollution to disease burden remained high in India between 1990 and 2016, with levels of exposure among the highest in the world. It causes burden through a mix of non-communicable and infectious diseases, mainly cardiovascular diseases, chronic respiratory diseases, and lower respiratory infections.<br /> <br /> &bull; The burden of household air pollution decreased during the period 1990-2016 due to decreasing use of solid fuels for cooking, and that of outdoor air pollution increased due to a variety of pollutants from power production, industry, vehicles, construction, and waste burning.<br /> <br /> &bull; Household air pollution was responsible for 5 percent of the total disease burden in India in 2016, and outdoor air pollution for 6 percent. The burden due to household air pollution is highest in the EAG states, where its improvement since 1990 has also been the slowest. On the other hand, the burden due to outdoor air pollution is highest in a mix of northern states, including Haryana, Uttar Pradesh, Punjab, Rajasthan, Bihar, and West Bengal.<br /> &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> The report entitled National Health Accounts: Estimates for India 2014-15 (released in October, 2017) provides healthcare expenditures in India based on National Health Accounts Guidelines for India, 2016 (with refinements where required) that adhere to System of Health Accounts 2011 (SHA 2011), a global standard framework for producing health accounts. The NHA estimates for India is a result of an institutionalised process wherein, the boundaries, data sources, classification codes and estimation methodology have all been standardised in consultation with national and international experts under the guidance of NHA Expert Group for India.<br /> <br /> The NHA provides key indicators to understand financing of health system in the country and allows for comparison with other countries. The National Health Policy 2017 sets out several goals related to healthcare financing and emphasizes the need to track expenditures on health through a robust system of National Health Accounts. The production of annual NHA estimates builds a database for tracking trends in allocations for health by union/state governments and estimate the burden of out-of-pocket payments.<br /> <br /> The key findings of the report entitled [inside]National Health Accounts: Estimates for India 2014-15 (released in October, 2017)[/inside], which has been prepared by the National Health Accounts Technical Secretariat, National Health Systems Resource Centre and Ministry of Health and Family Welfare&nbsp; are as follows (please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/National%20Health%20Accounts%20Estimates%20Report%202014-15.pdf" title="National Health Accounts Estimates for India 2014-15">click here</a> to access):<br /> <br /> &bull; The Total Health Expenditure (THE) for India is estimated at Rs. 4,83,259 crores (3.89 percent of GDP and Rs. 3,826 per capita) for the year 2014-15. THE constitutes current and capital expenditures incurred by Government and Private Sources including External/Donor funds. Current Health Expenditure (CHE) is Rs. 4,51,286 crores (93.4 percent of THE) and capital expenditures is Rs. 31,973 crores (6.6 percent of THE).<br /> <br /> &bull; The Government Health Expenditure (GHE) including capital expenditure is Rs. 1,39,949 crores (29 percent of THE, 1.13 percent GDP and Rs. 1,108 per capita) for the year 2014-15. This amounts to about 3.94 percent of General Government Expenditure in 2014-15. Of the GHE, Union Government share is 37 percent and State Government share is 63 percent. Union Government Expenditure on National Health Mission is Rs. 20,199 crores, Defence Medical Services Rs. 6,695 crores, Railway Health Services is Rs. 2,111 crores, Central Government Health Scheme (CGHS) is Rs. 2,300 crores and Ex Servicemen Contributory Health Scheme (ECHS) is Rs. 2,243 crores.<br /> <br /> &bull; The Out-of-Pocket Expenditure (OOPE) on health by households is Rs. 3,02,425 crores (62.6 percent of THE, 2.4 percent of GDP, Rs. 2,394 per capita) for the year 2014-15. Private Health Insurance expenditure is Rs. 17,755 crores (3.7 percent of THE) for the year 2014-15.<br /> <br /> &bull; Of the Current Health Expenditure, Union Government share is Rs. 37,221 crores (8.2 percent) and the State Government&rsquo;s share Rs. 59,978 crores (13.3 percent). Local bodies&rsquo; share is Rs. 2,960 crores (0.7 percent), Households share (including insurance contributions) about Rs. 3,20,262 crores (71 percent, OOPE being 67 percent). Contribution by enterprises (including insurance contributions) is Rs. 20,069 crores (4.4 percent) and NGOs is Rs. 7,422 crores (1.6 percent). External/donor funding contributes to about Rs. 3,374 crores (0.7 percent).<br /> <br /> &bull; The Current Health Expenditure attributed to Government Hospitals is Rs. 64,685 crores (14.3 percent) and Private Hospitals Rs. 1, 16,943 (25.9 percent). Expenditures incurred on other Government Providers (including PHC, Dispensaries and Family Planning Centres) is Rs. 27,782 crores (6.2 percent), Other Private Providers (incl. private clinics) is Rs. 23,795 crores (5.3 percent), Providers of Patient Transport and Emergency Rescue is Rs. 20,627 crores (4.6 percent), Medical and Diagnostic laboratories is Rs. 21,058 crores (4.7 percent), Pharmacies is Rs. 1,30,451 crores (28.9 percent), Other Retailers is Rs. 559 crores (0.1 percent), Providers of Preventive care is Rs. 23,817 crores (5.3 percent), and Other Providers is Rs. 9,985 crores (2.2 percent). About Rs. 11,584 crores (2.6 percent) is attributed to Providers of Health System Administration and Financing.<br /> <br /> &bull; Current health expenditure attributed to Inpatient Curative Care is Rs. 1,58,334 crores (35.1 percent), Outpatient curative care is Rs. 73,059 crores (16.2 percent), Patient Transportation is Rs. 20,627 crores (4.6 percent), Laboratory and Imaging services is Rs. 21,058 crores (4.7 percent), Prescribed Medicines is Rs. 1,28,887 crores (28.6 percent), Over The Counter (OTC) Medicines is Rs. 1564 crores (0.3 percent), Therapeutic Appliances and Medical Goods is Rs. 559 crores (0.1 percent), Preventive Care is Rs. 30,420 crores (6.7 percent), and others is Rs. 5,194 crores (1.2 percent). About Rs. 11,584 crores (2.6 percent) is attributed to Governance and Health System Administration.<br /> <br /> &bull; Total Pharmaceutical Expenditure is 37.9 percent of CHE (includes prescribed medicines, over the counter drugs and those provided during an inpatient, outpatient or any other event involving a contact with health care provider). The Expenditure on Traditional, Complementary and Alternative Medicine (TCAM) is 16 percent of CHE.<br /> <br /> &bull; The Current Health Expenditure attributed to Primary Care is 45.1 percent, Secondary Care is 35.6 percent, Tertiary care is 15.6 percent and governance and supervision is 2.6 percent. When this is disaggregated; Government expenditure on Primary Care is 51.3 percent, Secondary Care is 21.9 percent and Tertiary Care is 14 percent. Private expenditure on Primary Care is 43.1 percent, Secondary Care is 39.9 percent and Tertiary Care is 16.1 percent.<br /> &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/National%20Health%20Policy%202017.pdf">click here</a> to access the [inside]National Health Policy 2017[/inside].</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> The National Health Profile provides the latest data on all major health sector-related indicators in a comprehensive manner. It gives information on 6 major sectors i.e. Demographic, Socio-economic, Health Status, Health Finance, Health Infrastructure and Human Resources.&nbsp;<br /> <br /> According to the [inside]National Health Profile 2015[/inside], produced by the Central Bureau of Health Intelligence, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, (please <a href="http://www.cbhidghs.nic.in/E-Book%20HTML-2015/index.html">click here</a> to access):<br /> <br /> <strong><em>Demographic indicators</em></strong><br /> <br /> &bull; Infant Mortality Rate has declined considerably (40 per 1000 live births in 2013), however differentials of rural (44) and urban (27) are still high.<br /> <br /> &bull; Maternal Mortality Ratio (per 1 lakh live births) is highest in Assam (300) and lowest in Kerala (61) in 2011-13.<br /> <br /> &bull; The life expectancy at birth has increased from 49.7 years in 1970-75 to 66.1 years in 2006-10. During 2006-10, the life expectancy for females has been 67.7 years and males has been 64.6 years.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; Among the states, sex ratio is least for Haryana (879) while among the UTs, Daman and Diu (618) lags behind. Kerala (1084) tops the list with maximum sex ratio.<br /> <br /> &bull; The Total Fertility Rate (TFR) for the country has been 2.3 in 2013. In rural areas it has been 2.5, and in urban areas it has been 1.8.<br /> <br /> <strong><em>Socio-economic indicators</em></strong><br /> <br /> &bull; Literacy rate stood at 73 percent in 2011. Literacy rate among females has been 64.6 percent and males has been 80.9 percent. Literacy rate in urban areas (84.1 percent) has been more as compared to the same in rural areas (67.8 percent). Literacy rate has been highest in Kerala (94 percent)<br /> <br /> &bull; The percentage of population below the poverty line (as per Tendulkar methodology) has been 21.9 percent in 2011-12. The percentage of population below the poverty line in rural areas has been 25.7 percent and in urban areas has been 13.7 percent.<br /> <br /> &bull; The per capita Net National Income at current prices increased almost 3 times from Rs. 24,143 in 2004-05 to Rs. 74,920 in 2013-14.<br /> <br /> &bull; The per capita per day net availability of cereals has increased from 386.2 gm in 2001 to 468.9 gm in 2013. Similarly, the per capita per day net availability of pulses has increased from 30 gm in 2001 to 41.9 gm in 2013.<br /> <br /> &bull; Slum population in India is projected to increase from 9.30 crore in 2011 to 10.47 crore in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; Of the total 1.34 crore residences in slums, nearly 58.5 percent are in good condition, 37.4 percent are in livable condition and 4.1 percent are in dilapidated condition.&nbsp;<br /> <br /> <strong><em>Health status </em></strong><br /> <br /> &bull; Based on available evidence, cardiovascular disease (24 percent), chronic respiratory disease (11 percent), cancer (6 percent) and diabetes (2 percent) are the leading cause of mortality in India.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of dengue cases in India has grown from 28,292 in 2010 to 40,425 in 2014. The total number of dengue related deaths stood at 131 in 2014.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of Japanese Encephalitis cases in India has grown from 555 in 2010 to 1,652 in 2014. The total number of Japanese Encephalitis related deaths stood at 292 in 2014.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of malaria cases in India has grown from nearly 16 lakh in 2010 to 10.71 lakh in 2014. The total number of malaria related deaths stood at 535 in 2014.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of Chikungunya fever cases in India has reduced from 48,176 in 2010 to 15,445 in 2014.&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; Nearly 47 percent of deliveries in India during 2012-13 were institutional whereas 52.3 percent deliveries took place at home.&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; Nearly 40.5 percent of children under 3 years of age were breastfed within an hour of birth in 2012-13.&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; At the national level, nearly 54 percent of children aged 12-23 months received full vaccination during 2012-13.<br /> <br /> &bull; The incidence of infanticide was 82 and foeticide was 210 in 2012.<br /> <br /> <strong><em>Health finance</em></strong><br /> <br /> &bull; Per capita public expenditure on health in nominal terms has gone up from Rs. 621 in 2009-10 to Rs. 1280 in 2014-15.<br /> <br /> &bull; Public expenditure on health as a percentage of GDP has gone up from 1.12 percent in 2009-10 to 1.26 percent in 2014-15.<br /> <br /> &bull; The Centre-state share in total public expenditure on health has changed from 36:64 in 2009-10 to 30:70 in 2014-15.<br /> <br /> &bull; Out-of-pocket (OOP) medical expenditure incurred during 2011-12 has been Rs. 146 per capita per month for urban India and Rs. 95 for rural India.<br /> <br /> &bull; Over 60 percent of total OOP health expenditure is on medicines, both in rural and urban India in 2011-12.<br /> <br /> &bull; As a share of total consumption expenditure, OOP expenditure on health has been 6.7 percent in rural India and 5.5 percent in urban India in 2011-12.<br /> <br /> &bull; Per capita OOP expenditure as well as the share of OOP in total consumption expenditure was positively correlated with consumption expenditure fractiles; higher fractiles had higher levels of both per capita OOP and share of OOP in consumption expenditure in 2011-12.<br /> <br /> &bull; Among all the states, Kerala had the highest per capita OOP medical expenditure as well as its share in total consumption expenditure in 2011-12.<br /> <br /> &bull; Around 22 crore individuals were covered under any health insurance in 2013-14. This means 18 percent of the population has been covered under any health insurance.<br /> <br /> <strong><em>Human resources in health sector</em></strong><br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of doctors possessing recognized medical qualification (under the IMC Act), registered with state medical councils or Medical Council of India, stood at 15,976 in 2014.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of dental surgeons registered with the Central/ State Dental Councils of India stood at 1.54 lakhs in 2014, which was 21,720 in 1994.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of Government allopathic doctors stood at 1.06 lakhs and the total number of Government dental surgeons stood at 5,614.<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 31 December, 2014, the total number of Auxiliary Nurse Midwives (ANMs) stood at 7.86 lakh, whereas Registered Nurses &amp; Registered Midwives (RN &amp; RM) stood at 17.8 lakhs and Lady Health Visitors (LHV) stood at 55,914.<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 27 June, 2014, the total number of pharmacists stood at 6.64 lakh.<br /> <br /> <strong><em>Health infrastructure</em></strong><br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of licensed blood banks in India as on February 2015 is 2760.<br /> <br /> &bull; There are 20,306 hospitals having 6.76 lakh beds in India. There are 16,816 hospitals in rural areas having 1.84 lakh beds and 3,490 hospitals in urban areas having 4.92 lakh beds.<br /> <br /> &bull; The number of medical colleges in India has more than doubled from 146 in 1991-92 to 398 in 2014-15.<br /> &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> The 71st round National Sample Survey on &ldquo;Social Consumption: Health&rdquo; was conducted during January to June 2014. The information in the survey was collected from 36,480 households in rural areas and 29,452 households in urban areas during the 71st round.<br /> <br /> The key findings of the [inside]71st round NSS report: Key Indicators of Social Consumption in India Health (published in June 2015)[/inside] are as follows (please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/nss_71st_ki_health_30june15.pdf" title="NSS 71st Round Health">click here</a> to access the full report; please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/NSS%20Press%20Release%20Health.pdf" title="NSS Press Note Health">click here</a> to read the summary of findings):<br /> <br /> <em>A. Non-hospitalized treatment</em><br /> <br /> &bull; The Proportion (per 1000) of Ailing Persons (PAP), measured as the number of living persons reporting ailments (per 1000 persons), was 89 persons in rural India and 118 persons in urban India.<br /> <br /> &bull; Inclination towards allopathy treatment was prevalent (around 90% in both the sectors). Only 5 to 7 percent usage of &lsquo;other&rsquo; including AYUSH (Ayurveda, Yoga or Naturopathy Unani, Siddha and homoeopathy) was reported both in rural and urban area. Moreover, un-treated spell was higher in rural (both for male and female) than urban areas.<br /> <br /> &bull; Private doctors were the most important single source of treatment in both the sectors (Rural &amp; Urban). More than 70 percent (72 per cent in the rural areas and 79 per cent in the urban areas) spells of ailment were treated in the private sector (consisting of private doctors, nursing homes, private hospitals, charitable institutions, etc.).<br /> <br /> <em>B. Hospitalized treatment</em><br /> <br /> &bull; Medical treatment of an ailing person as an in-patient in any medical institution having provision for treating the sick as in-patients, was considered as hospitalised treatment. In the urban population, 4.4 percent persons were hospitalised at some time during a reference period of 365 days. The proportion of persons hospitalised in the rural areas was lower (3.5 percent).<br /> <br /> &bull; It is observed that in rural India, 42 percent hospitalised treatment was carried out in public hospital and rest 58 percent in private hospital. For the urban India, the corresponding figures were 32 percent and 68 percent. It may be noted in this context that households (or persons within households) were segregated in sector (rural/urban) by their place of domicile, and not by the place of treatment.<br /> <br /> &bull; Preference towards allopathy treatment was observed in cases of hospitalised treatment as well.<br /> <br /> <em>C. Cost of treatment - as in-patient and other</em><br /> <br /> &bull; Average medical expenditure per hospitalisation case: Higher amount was spent for treatment per hospitalised case by people in the private hospitals (Rs. 25850) than in the public hospitals (Rs. 6120). The highest expenditure was recorded for treatment of Cancer (Rs. 56712) followed by that for Cardio-vascular diseases (Rs. 31647).<br /> <br /> &bull; Average medical expenditure per non-hospitalisation case was Rs. 509 in rural India and Rs. 639 in urban India.<br /> <br /> &bull; As much as 86 percent of rural population and 82 percent of urban population were still not covered under any scheme of health expenditure support. Government, however, was able to bring about 12 percent urban and 13 percent rural population under health protection coverage through Rastriya Swasthya Bima Yojana (RSBY) or similar plan. Only 12 percent households of the 5th quintile class (Usual Monthly Per Capita Consumer Expenditure) of urban area had some arrangement of medical insurance from private provider.<br /> <br /> <em>D. Incidence of childbirth, Expenditure on institutional childbirth</em><br /> <br /> &bull; In rural area 9.6% women (age 15-49) were pregnant at any time during the reference period of 365 days; for urban this proportion was 6.8%. Evidence of interrelation of place of childbirth with level of living is noted both in rural and urban areas. In the rural areas, about 20% of the childbirths were at home or any other place other than the hospitals. The same for urban areas was 10.5%. Among the institutional childbirth, 55.5% took place in public hospital and 24% in private hospital in rural area. In urban area, however, the corresponding figures were 42% and 47.5% respectively.<br /> <br /> &bull; An average of Rs. 5544 was spent per childbirth (as inpatient) in rural area and Rs. 11685 in urban area. The rural population spent, on an average, Rs. 1587 for the same in a public sector hospital and Rs. 14778 for one in a private sector hospital. The corresponding figures for urban India were Rs. 2117 and Rs. 20328.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> The key findings of the [inside]Draft National Health Policy 2015 (published in December 2014)[/inside], prepared by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare are as follows (Please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Draft%20National%20Health%20Policy%202015.pdf" title="Draft NHP 2015">click here</a> to download):<br /> <br /> &bull; The draft National Health Policy accepts and endorses the understanding that a full achievement of the goals and principles as defined would require an increased public health expenditure to 4% to 5% of the GDP. However, given that the NHP, 2002 target of 2% was not met, and taking into account the financial capacity of the country to provide this amount and the institutional capacity to utilize the increased funding in an effective manner, the present draft health policy proposes a potentially achievable target of raising public health expenditure to 2.5% of the GDP. It also notes that 40% of this would need to come from Central expenditures. At current prices, a target of 2.5% of GDP translates to Rs. 3800 per capita, representing an almost four fold increase in five years.<br /> <br /> &bull; The private sector today provides nearly 80% of outpatient care and about 60% of inpatient care. (The out-patient estimate would be significantly lower if we included only qualified providers. By NSSO estimates as much as 40% of the private care is likely to be by informal unqualified providers). 72% of all private health care enterprises are own-account-enterprises (OAEs), which are household run businesses providing health services without hiring a worker on a fairly regular basis.<br /> <br /> &bull; In terms of comparative efficiency, public sector is value for money as it accounts (based on the NSSO 60th round) for less than 30% of total expenditure, but provides for about 20% of outpatient care and 40% of in-patient care. This same expenditure also pays for 60% of end-of-life care (RGI estimates on hospital mortality), and almost 100% of preventive and promotive care and a substantial part of medical and nursing education as well.<br /> <br /> &bull; Thailand has almost the same total health expenditure as India but its proportion of public health expenditure is 77.7% of total health expenditures (which is 3.2% of the GDP) and this is spent through a form of strategic purchasing in which about 95% is purchased from public health care facilities- which is what gives it such a high efficiency. Brazil spends 9% of its GDP on health but of this public health expenditure constitutes 4.1% of the GDP (which is 45.7% of total health expenditure). This public health expenditure accounts for almost 75% of all health care provision. It would be ambitious if India could aspire to a public health expenditure of 4% of the GDP, but most expert groups have estimated 2.5% as being more realistic.<br /> <br /> &bull; As costs of care rise, affordability, as distinct from equity, requires emphasis. Health care costs of a household exceeding 10% of its total monthly consumption expenditures or 40% of its non-food consumption expenditure- is designated catastrophic health expenditures- and is declared as an unacceptable level of health care costs.<br /> <br /> &bull; Almost all hospitalization even in public hospitals leads to catastrophic health expenditures, and over 63 million persons are faced with poverty every year due to health care costs alone. It is because there is no financial protection for the vast majority of health care needs. In 2011-12, the share of out-of-pocket expenditure on health care as a proportion of total household monthly per capita expenditure was 6.9% in rural areas and 5.5% in urban areas. This led to an increasing number of households facing catastrophic expenditures due to health costs (18% of all households in 2011-12 as compared to 15% in 2004-05). Under NRHM, free care in public hospitals was extended to a select set of conditions &ndash; for maternity, newborn and infant care as part of the Janani Suraksha Yojana and, the Janani Shishu Suraksha Karyakram, and for disease control programmes. For all other services, user fees especially for diagnostics and &ldquo;outside prescriptions&rdquo; for drugs continued. Also, due to the selective approach, several essential services especially for chronic illness was not obtainable or at best only available at overcrowded district and medical college hospitals resulting in physical and financial hardship and poor quality of care.<br /> <br /> &bull; The Central Government under the Ministry of Labour &amp; Employment, launched the Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana (RSBY) in 2008. The population coverage under these various schemes increased from almost 55 million people in 2003-04 to about 370 million in 2014 (almost one-fourth of the population). Nearly two thirds (180 million) of this population are those in the Below Poverty Line (BPL) category. Evaluations show that schemes such as the RSBY, have improved utilization of hospital services, especially in private sector and among the poorest 20% of households and SC/ST households. However there are other problems. One problem is low awareness among the beneficiaries about the entitlement and how and when to use the RSBY card. Another is related to denial of services by private hospitals for many categories of illnesses, and over supply of some services.<br /> <br /> &bull; The private health care industry is valued at $40 billion and is projected to grow to $ 280 billion by 2020 as per market sources. The current growth rate of this perennially and most rapidly growing area of the economy, the healthcare industry, at 14% is projected to be 21% in the next decade. Even during the global recession of 2008, this sector remained relatively recession-proof. The private health care industry is complex and differentiated. It includes insurance and equipment, which accounts for about 15%, pharmaceuticals which accounts for over 25%, about 10% on diagnostics and about 50% is hospitals and clinical care. The private sector growth cannot be seen merely as a consequence of limited public sector investment. The Government has had an active policy in the last 25 years of building a positive economic climate for the health care industry. Amongst these measures are lower direct taxes; higher depreciation in medical equipment; Income Tax exemptions for 5 years for rural hospitals; custom duty exemptions for imported equipment that are lifesaving; Income Tax exemption for Health Insurance; and active engagement through publicly financed health insurance which now covers almost 27% of the population.<br /> <br /> &bull; Maternal mortality now accounts for 0.55% of all deaths and 4% of all female deaths in the 15 to 49 year age group.<br /> <br /> &bull; India is set to reach the Millennium Development Goals (MDG) with respect to maternal and child survival. The MDG target for Maternal Mortality Ratio (MMR) is 140 per 100,000 live births. From a baseline of 560 in 1990, the nation had achieved 178 by 2010-12, and at this rate of decline is estimated to reach an MMR of 141 by 2015.<br /> <br /> &bull; In the case of under-5 mortality rate (U5MR), the MDG target is 42. From a baseline of 126 in 1990, in 2012 the nation has an U5MR of 52 and an extrapolation of this rate would bring it to 42 by 2015. This is particularly creditable on a global scale where in 1990 India&#39;s MMR and U5MR were 47% and 40% above the international average respectively.<br /> <br /> &bull; Although over 90% of pregnant women receive one antenatal check up and 87% received full TT immunization, only about 68.7% of women have received the mandatory three antenatal check-ups. Again whereas most women had received iron and folic acid tablets, only 31% of pregnant women had consumed more than 100 IFA tablets. For institutional delivery, standard protocols are often not followed during labour and the postpartum period. Sterilization related deaths a preventable tragedy, are often a direct consequence of poor quality of care. Only 61% of children (12-23 months) have been fully immunized.<br /> <br /> &bull; In AIDS control, progress has been good with a decline from a 0.41% prevalence rate in 2001 to 0.27% in 2011 but this still leaves about 21 lakh persons living with HIV, with about 1.16 lakh new cases and 1.48 deaths in 2011. In tuberculosis the challenge is a prevalence of close to 211 cases and 19 deaths per 100,000 population and rising problems of multi-drug resistant tuberculosis. Though these are significant declines from the MDG baseline, India still contributes to 24% of all global new case detection.<br /> <br /> &bull; Over 75% of communicable diseases are not part of existing national programmes. Overall, communicable diseases contribute to 24.4% of the entire disease burden while maternal and neonatal ailments contribute to 13.8%. Non-communicable diseases (39.1%) and injuries (11.8%) now constitute the bulk of the country&#39;s disease burden. National Health Programmes for non-communicable diseases are very limited in coverage and scope, except perhaps in the case of the Blindness control programme.<br /> <br /> &bull; The gap between service availability and needs is widest in the case of mental illness- 43 facilities in the nation with a 0.47 psychologists per million people.<br /> <br /> &bull; The elderly i.e. the population above 60 years comprise 8.6% of the population (103.8 million) and they are also a vulnerable section. Those above 75 years (20.52 million) are most vulnerable and almost 8% of the elderly population is bed ridden or homebound (NSSO).<br /> <br /> **page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The report entitled [inside]Economic Burden of Tobacco Related Diseases in India[/inside] (please&nbsp;<a href="tinymce/uploaded/economic_burden_of_tobacco_related_diseases_in_india_executive_summary.pdf" title="Economic Burden of tobacco related diseases">click here</a>&nbsp;to download the Executive Summary), supported by the Ministry of Health &amp; Family Welfare, Government of India and the WHO Country Office for India, was developed by the Public Health Foundation of India (PHFI).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The report estimates direct and indirect costs from all diseases caused due to tobacco use and four specific diseases namely, respiratory diseases, tuberculosis, cardiovascular diseases and cancers. The report also highlights that tobacco use and the associated costs are creating an enormous burden for the nation.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The total economic costs attributable to tobacco use from all diseases in India in the year 2011 for persons aged 35-69 amounted to Rs. 104500 crores of which 16 percent was direct cost and 84 percent was indirect cost.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to the report, massive direct medical costs of tobacco attributable diseases amount to Rs.16,800 crore and associated indirect morbidity cost of Rs. 14,700 crore. The cost from premature mortality is Rs. 73,000 crores, indicating a substantial productive loss to the nation, the report states.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to the United Nations&#39; report (released in May, 2014) entitled [inside]Trends in maternal mortality estimates 1990 to 2013[/inside], (please&nbsp;<a href="tinymce/uploaded/Trends%20in%20Maternal%20Mortality%201990%20to%202013.pdf" title="Trends in Maternal Mortality 1990 to 2013">click here</a>&nbsp;to download):&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em><strong>Indian scenario</strong></em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Maternal mortality ratio (MMR)* in India stood at 560 maternal deaths (per 100000 live births) during 1990, 460 during 1995, 370 during 2000, 280 during 2005 and 190 during 2013.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; As compared to India (MMR: 190 per 100000 live births), Brazil (MMR: 69) and China (MMR: 32) performed better in reducing maternal deaths.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; An Indian woman&rsquo;s lifetime risk of maternal death** &ndash; the probability that a 15 year old woman will eventually die from a maternal cause &ndash; is 1 in 190, whereas for a Chinese woman it is 1 in 1800 and for a Brazilian woman it is 1 in 780.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; At the country level, the two countries that accounted for one third of all global maternal deaths are India at 17 percent (50000) and Nigeria at 14 percent (40000).&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The proportion of deaths among women of reproductive age that are due to maternal causes (PM)*** in India is 6.7 percent whereas for China it is 1.6 percent and for Brazil it is 2.8 percent.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The ten countries that comprised 58 percent of the global maternal deaths reported in 2013 are: India (50000, 17%); Nigeria (40000, 14%); Democratic Republic of the Congo (21000, 7%); Ethiopia (13000, 4%); Indonesia (8800, 3%); Pakistan (7900, 3%); United Republic of Tanzania (7900, 3%); Kenya (6300, 2%); China (5900, 2%); Uganda (5900, 2%).&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; India could reduce MMR by 65 percent between 1990 and 2013.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The present report has classified India among 96 countries with incomplete civil registration and/or other types of maternal mortality data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em><strong>Global scenario</strong></em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Every day, approximately 800 women die from preventable causes related to pregnancy and childbirth.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Under MDG5, countries committed to reducing maternal mortality by three quarters between 1990 and 2015. Since 1990, maternal deaths worldwide have dropped by 45%. However, between 1990 and 2013, the global maternal mortality ratio (i.e. the number of maternal deaths per 100 000 live births) declined by only 2.6% per year. This is far from the annual decline of 5.5% required to achieve MDG5.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; 99 percent of all maternal deaths occur in developing countries. More than half of these deaths occur in sub-Saharan Africa and almost one third occur in South Asia.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The maternal mortality ratio in developing countries in 2013 is 230 per 100 000 live births versus 16 per 100 000 live births in developed countries.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; A woman&rsquo;s lifetime risk of maternal death &ndash; the probability that a 15 year old woman will eventually die from a maternal cause &ndash; is 1 in 3700 in developed countries, versus 1 in 160 in developing countries.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Maternal mortality is higher in women living in rural areas and among poorer communities.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Young adolescents face a higher risk of complications and death as a result of pregnancy than older women.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The major complications that account for 80% of all maternal deaths are: a. severe bleeding (mostly bleeding after childbirth); b. infections (usually after childbirth); c. high blood pressure during pregnancy (pre-eclampsia and eclampsia); and d. unsafe abortion. The remainder are caused by or associated with diseases such as malaria, and AIDS during pregnancy. Skilled care before, during and after childbirth can save the lives of women and newborn babies.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; While levels of antenatal care have increased in many parts of the world during the past decade, only 46 percent of women in low-income countries benefit from skilled care during childbirth.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Other factors that prevent women from receiving or seeking care during pregnancy and childbirth are: poverty, distance, lack of information, inadequate services and cultural practices.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Note:&nbsp;</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">* Maternal mortality ratio (MMR) is the number of maternal deaths during a given time period per 100000 live births during the same time period.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">** Adult lifetime risk of maternal death is the probability that a 15-year-old women will die eventually from a maternal cause.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">*** Proportion of deaths among women of reproductive age that are due to maternal causes (PM) is the number of maternal deaths in a given time period divided by the total deaths among women aged 15&ndash;49 years.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Rural%20Health%20Statistics%20of%20India%202012.pdf" title="Rural Health Statistics of India 2012">click here</a> to access the latest edition of [inside]Rural Health Statistics in India 2012[/inside] that was released by the Union health ministry. The report provides detailed statistics on rural health infrastructure on the basis of information available up to March, 2012 and data provided by the States and Union Territories.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> According to the UNICEF report titled [inside]Committing to Child Survival: A Promise Renewed Progress Report 2013[/inside] (please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/APR_Progress_Report_2013_9_Sept_2013_1.pdf" title="UNICEF child mortality report">click here</a> to download):<br /> <br /> <strong><em>Indian scenario</em></strong><br /> <br /> &bull; Under Five Mortality Rate (Probability of dying between birth and exactly 5 years of age, expressed per 1,000 live births) in India for the year 2012, stands at 56 and India&#39;s ranking in terms of U5MR is 49. In 2012, the neonatal mortality rate (Probability of dying in the first month of life, expressed per 1,000 live births) at national level is at 31. The share of neonatal deaths in under-five deaths stood at 55 percent in 2012 as compared to 41 percent in 1990.&nbsp;&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; U5MR in India declined by 55 percent from 126 in 1990 to 56 in 2012. Infant Mortality Rate (Probability of dying between birth and exactly 1 year of age, expressed per 1,000 live births) declined from 88 in 1990 to 44 in 2012. Neonatal mortality rate declined from 51 in 1990 to 31 in 2012.&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; U5MR in India among boys declined from 121 in 1990 to 54 in 2012. U5MR in India among girls declined from 130 in 1990 to 59 in 2012.<br /> <br /> &bull; In 2012, 21 percent deaths among Indian children under 5 years of age occurred due to pneumonia, 10 percent due to diarrhoea, 1 percent due to malaria, 3 percent due to measles and 43 percent due to neonatal causes.<br /> <br /> &bull; Half of all under-five deaths occur in just five countries: India (22%), Nigeria (13%), Pakistan, the Democratic Republic of the Congo (each 6%) and China (4%).<br /> <br /> &bull; Around two-thirds of neonatal deaths occur in just 10 countries, with India accounting for more than one-quarter and Nigeria for a tenth. More than 4 in 10 of all neonatal deaths worldwide occur in just three countries: India, Nigeria, and Pakistan.<br /> <br /> &bull; More than half of the under-five deaths caused by pneumonia or diarrhoea occur in just four countries: India, Nigeria, Pakistan and the Democratic Republic of the Congo.<br /> <br /> &bull; The Governments of Ethiopia, India and the United States, together with the UN agency, launched in 2012 &lsquo;Committing to Child Survival: A Promise Renewed&#39;, a global effort to accelerate efforts to stop young children from dying from preventable causes. Some 176 governments have signed on, including those making some of the greatest strides in under-five mortality.<br /> <br /> &bull; In February 2013, the Government of India, another cosponsor of the global Call to Action, convened a national forum of state policymakers, technical advisors, civil society organizations and private-sector partners to identify and commit to high-impact strategies that can accelerate the decline in preventable child deaths.<br /> <br /> <strong><em>Global scenario</em></strong><br /> <br /> &bull; In 2012, around 6.6 million children died globally before their fifth birthday, at a rate of around 18,000 per day. Since 1990, 216 million children have died before their fifth birthday &mdash; more than the current total population of Brazil, the world&rsquo;s fifth most populous country.<br /> <br /> &bull; Of the 6.6 million under-five deaths globally in 2012, most were from preventable causes such as pneumonia, diarrhoea or malaria; around 44% of deaths in children under 5 occurred during the neonatal period. Pneumonia and diarrhoea remain leading causes of deaths among children under 5, killing almost 5,000 children under 5 every day. Malaria remains an important cause of child death, killing 1,200 children under 5 every day.<br /> <br /> &bull; Global progress in reducing child deaths since 1990 has been very significant. The global rate of under-five mortality has roughly halved, from 90 deaths per 1,000 live births in 1990 to 48 per 1,000 in 2012. The estimated annual number of under-five deaths has fallen from 12.6 million to 6.6 million over the same period.<br /> <br /> &bull; Put another way, 17,000 fewer children die each day in 2012 than did in 1990 &mdash; thanks to more effective and affordable treatments, innovative ways of delivering critical interventions to the poor and excluded, and sustained political commitment. These and other vital child survival interventions have helped to save an estimated 90 million lives in the past 22 years.<br /> <br /> &bull; The global annual rate of reduction in under-five deaths has steadily accelerated since 1990-1995, when it stood at 1.2%, more than tripling to 3.9% in 2005-2012. Both sub-Saharan African regions&mdash;particularly Eastern and Southern Africa but also West and Central Africa&mdash;have seen a consistent acceleration in reducing under-five deaths, particularly since 2000.<br /> <br /> &bull; At the current rate of reduction in under-five mortality, the world will only make MDG 4 by 2028 &mdash; 13 years after the deadline &mdash; and 35 million more children will die between 2015 and 2028 whose lives could be saved if we were able to make the goal on time in 2015 and continue that trend.<br /> <br /> &bull; Accelerating progress in child survival urgently requires greater attention to ending preventable child deaths in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia, which together account for 4 out of 5 under-five deaths globally.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to the [inside]Pneumonia Progress Report, 2012[/inside], released by IVAC and John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012.pdf" title="Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012">click here</a> to access:</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The 2000-2010 decade brought a significant reduction in overall child mortality, from 9.6 to 7.6 million. Pneumonia continues to be the number one killer of children around the world-causing 18% of all child mortality, an estimated 1.3 million child deaths in 2011 alone.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Nearly 99 percent of all pneumonia deaths occur in developing countries, and three-quarters take place in just 15 countries. The majority of pneumonia cases are preventable or treatable.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Pneumonia is the leading cause of child mortality in India, responsible for the deaths of nearly 400,000 &nbsp;children under five in 2010.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Percentage of Indian children with suspected pneumonia receiving antibiotics stood at 13 percent in 2010.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Percentage of under-five Indian children with suspected pneumonia taken to appropriate health-care provider stood at 69 percent in 2010.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Percentage of children receiving exclusive breastfeeding in first 6 months of life is 46 percent (as per latest available data during 2006-2010).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Vaccine coverage in the case of DTP3 (third dose of diphtheria and tetanus toxoid and pertussis vaccine) is 72 percent and in the case of measles is 74 percent in 2011.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; India and Nigeria, two large countries with the highest numbers of child deaths worldwide, remain low scorers with an average intervention coverage (interventions in terms of vaccination, breastfeeding, access to care and antibiotic treatment) rate of 55% and 40%, respectively.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; One notable area of progress in India is on coverage of two vaccines that can help prevent pneumonia, Hib vaccine and measles vaccine. While Hib vaccine uptake has been slow in India&rsquo;s public sector, momentum is now shifting following efforts by the Ministry of Health &amp; Family Welfare (MOHFW), states, health experts and advocates to prioritize implementation of the National Technical Advisory Group on Immunization&rsquo;s (NTAGI) recommendation to add Hib to the Universal Immunization Programme (UIP).&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Two Indian states, Tamil Nadu and Kerala, introduced Hib vaccines (in the form of the pentavalent vaccine) in December 2011, and six more are slated to do so by the end of 2012. At a recent Hib Symposium in the state of Odisha, MOHFW officials stated that at least twice as many additional states have expressed interest in the vaccine.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; India has joined other WHO Member States in introducing a second dose of measles vaccine into the UIP to ensure its children are protected from the virus, which contributes to the burden of pneumonia. Measles was once one of the leading causes of death in children, but global measles deaths have declined dramatically because of widespread coverage with two doses of measles vaccine. India began a phased introduction of the second dose in 2010; by the end of the first year, the second dose of measles vaccine had been added to routine immunization in 21 states and catch-up campaigns were completed in 197 districts in 14 states.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to the report titled: [inside]Defeating malaria in Asia, the Pacific, Americas, Middle East and Europe, November, 2012[/inside], which has been produced by World Health Organization and PATH,&nbsp;<a href="http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Defeating%20malaria.pdf">http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Defeating%20malaria.pdf</a>: &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The Indian Commission on Macroeconomics and Health notes that, in India, 13 household person-days per patient were lost per episode of malaria. Furthermore, the commission estimated that the overall monetary losses to families (income losses together with treatment expenses) could amount to between 200 and 400 Indian rupees (US$ 3.5 to 7).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; With an estimated 22.5 million malaria cases in India, this translates to an annual cost of US$ 79 to 157 million, or 0.01% of gross domestic product each year.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In states with the highest incidence rates, such as Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Meghalaya, Mizoram, and Orissa, the annual cost of illness represents more than 0.1% of a gross state income.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Tribal populations living in forests in Orissa, India, have incidence rates that are almost 10 times higher than in the plains.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Odisha is one of the most highly malaria-endemic states in India, accounting for 24% of reported cases in 2010 despite consisting of less of than 4% of the national population. Malaria is particularly common among tribal groups which represent 44% of the population of Orissa.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; A study in Sundargarh District of Odisha showed that forest areas had an annual incidence of 280 cases per 1000 population compared to 30 cases per 1000 on the plains. Approximately 84% of infections in forest areas were due to P. falciparum compared to 69% in plain areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Malaria&rsquo;s main victims tend to be poorer populations living in rural communities, with limited or no access to long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; WHO estimates that 216 million cases of malaria occurred globally in 2010; 34 million (16%) of these occurred outside of Africa of which 18.1 million (53%) were due to P. falciparum.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; WHO estimates that 655 000 deaths occurred globally, of which 46 000 (7%) occurred outside of Africa. WHO estimates that 2.5 billion people were at risk of malaria outside of Africa.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; There are 98 countries with ongoing transmission of malaria. Of these, 47 lie on the African continent, 21 are in the Americas, and 30 in Europe, Asia, and the Pacific. Of the 98 countries, 81 are in the control phase, 8 in the pre-elimination phase, and 9 in the elimination phase.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; While the disease burden has been declining in countries with fewer malaria cases and deaths, progress has been slower in countries where the bulk of the disease burden lies: India, Indonesia, Myanmar, Pakistan, and Papua New Guinea. These five high-burden countries account for 89% of all malaria cases in the region.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Malaria transmission occurs in 17 countries of Asia. Approximately 2 billion people in the region live at some risk of malaria, of which 525 million live at high risk (reported incidence more than 1 case per 1000 population per year).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Most reported cases of malaria in Asia are due to P. falciparum although the proportion varies considerably by country; it exceeds 80% in the Lao People&rsquo;s Democratic Republic, Myanmar, Timor-Leste, and Viet Nam, while transmission is exclusively due to P. vivax in the Democratic People&rsquo;s Republic of Korea and the Republic of Korea.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Insecticide resistance has now been reported in 24 out of 51 countries with malaria transmission outside of Africa.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to [inside]Children in India 2012-A Statistical Appraisal[/inside], Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, GoI, please <a href="https://im4change.org/docs/659Children_in_India_2012.pdf">click here</a> to access:</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em><strong>Neonatal Mortality Rate</strong></em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2010, the neonatal mortality rate (Probability of dying in the first month of life, expressed per 1,000 live births) at national level is at 33 and ranges from 19 in urban areas to 36 in rural areas. Among bigger states, neo-natal mortality rate is highest in Madhya Pradesh (44) and lowest in Kerala (7).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The rural&ndash;urban gap in neo natal mortality rate was highest in Andhra Pradesh and Assam (23 points), followed by Rajasthan (22 points). The rural &ndash;urban gap in neo natal mortality rate lowest in Kerala (3 points), followed by Tamil Nadu (6 points).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Factors which affect fetal and neonatal deaths are primarily endogenous, while those which affect post neonatal deaths are primarily exogenous. The endogenous factors are related to the formation of the foetus in the womb and are therefore, mainly biological in nature. Among the biological factors affecting fetal and neonatal infant mortality rates the important ones are the age of the mother, birth order, period of spacing between births, prematurity, weight at birth, mothers health.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em><strong>Infant Mortality Rate&nbsp;</strong></em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Infant Mortality Rate (Probability of dying between birth and exactly 1 year of age, expressed per 1,000 live births) has declined for males from 78 in 1990 to 46 in 2010 and for females the decline was from 81 to 49 during this period.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Infant Mortality Rate for the country as a whole declined from 66 in 2001 to 47 in 2010. With the present improved trend due to sharp fall during 2008-09, the national level estimate of infant mortality rate is likely to be 44 against the MDG target of 27 in 2015.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Infant Mortality Rate has declined in urban areas from 50 in 1990 to 31 in 2010, whereas in rural areas Infant Mortality Rate has declined from 86 to 51 during the same period.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Infant Mortality Rate in 2010, was lowest in Goa (10) followed by Kerala (13) and Manipur (14). The States of Madhya Pradesh (62), Orissa (61), Uttar Pradesh (61), Assam (58), Meghalaya (55), Rajasthan (55), Chhattisgarh (51), Bihar (48) and Haryana (48) reported infant mortality rate above the national average (47).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Among infants, the main causes of death are: Certain Conditions Originating in the Perinatal Period (67.2%), Certain infectious and Parasitic diseases (8.3%), Diseases of the Respiratory System (7.7%), Congenial Malformations, Deformations &amp; chromosomal Abnormalities (3.3%), Other causes (10.6%).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em><strong>Under Five Mortality Rate&nbsp;</strong></em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Under Five Mortality Rate (Probability of dying between birth and exactly 5 years of age, expressed per 1,000 live births) in India for the year 2010, stands at 59 and it varies from 66 in rural areas to 38 in Urban areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Under Five Mortality Rate stood at 64 for females whereas it is 55 for males in 2010.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Under Five Mortality Rate varies from lowest in Kerala (15), followed by 27 in Tamil Nadu to alarmingly high level in Assam (83), followed by Madhya Pradesh (82), Uttar Pradesh (79) and Odisha (78).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Given to reduce Under Five Mortality Rate to 42 per thousand live births by 2015, India tends to reach near to 52 by that year missing the target by 10 percentage points.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Among children aged 0 to 4 years, the main causes of death are: Certain infectious and Parasitic Diseases (23.1%), Diseases of the Respiratory System (16.1%), Diseases of the Nervous System (12.1%), Diseases of the Circulatory System (7.9%), Injury, Poisoning etc (0.9%), Other major causes (33.9 %).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em><strong>Immunization</strong></em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; At national level, 61% of the children aged 12-23 months have received full immunization in 2009. The coverage of immunization was higher in urban areas (67.4%) as compared to that in the rural areas (58.5%).&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Nearly 8% Indian children did not receive even a single vaccine in 2009. Nearly 62% of the male children aged 12-23 months have received full immunization, while among the females it was nearly 60%.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; 76.6 percent of children aged 12-23 months received full immunization coverage whose mothers had 12 or more years of education whereas 45.3 percent of children whose mothers had no education got full immunization.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; About 75.5% of children of less than one year belonging to the highest wealth index group are fully immunized while only 47.3% from the lowest quintile are fully immunized.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The full immunization coverage of children age 12-23 months is highest in Goa (87.9%), followed by Sikkim (85.3%), Punjab (83.6%), and Kerala (81.5%). The full immunization coverage is lowest in Arunachal Pradesh (24.8%).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to [inside]WHO Global Report: Mortality Attributable to Tobacco (2012)[/inside], please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Mortality%20due%20to%20tobacco.pdf" title="Mortality due to tobacco">click here</a> to access:&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Globally 12% of all deaths among adults aged 30 years and over were attributed to tobacco as compared with 16% in India, 17% in Pakistan and 31% in Bangladesh.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In India, the death rate from non-communicable diseases (NCDs) [1096 per 100,000 population] was about 3.3 times that for communicable diseases [336 per 100,000]. Tobacco was responsible for 9% of all NCDs as compared with 2% of all communicable disease related deaths.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The death rate due to tobacco in Indian men was 206 [per 100,000 men aged 30 years and over] as compared with 13 [per 100,000 women aged 30 years and over] for women. The proportion of deaths attributable to tobacco was almost 12% for men and 1% for women in India. &nbsp; &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Within the NCDs, ischaemic heart disease accounted for 329 deaths per 100,000 population aged 30 years and over, with 5% of these deaths attributed to tobacco in India. Cancer of the trachea, bronchus and lung accounted for 16 deaths per 100,000 population but with 58% of these deaths attributed to tobacco.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Within the communicable disease group, deaths attributed to tobacco accounted for 5% of all lower respiratory infection deaths and 4% of all tuberculosis deaths in India. &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The regions with the highest proportion of deaths atrributable to tobacco are the Americas and the European regions where tobacco has been used for a longer period of time.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; 71% of all lung cancer deaths globally are attributable to tobacco use. 42% of all chronic deaths globally are attributable to tobacco use.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Direct tobacco smoking is currently responsible for the death of about 5 million people worldwide each year with many deaths occuring prematurely. An additional 600,000 people are estimated to die from the effects of second-hand smoke.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In next 2 decades, the annual death from tobacco globally is expected to rise to over 8 million, with more than 80% of those deaths projected to occur in low-and middle-income countries.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; If effective measures are not urgently taken, tpbacco could in the 21st century kill over 1 billion people worldwide. Tobacco kills more than tuberculosis, HIV/ AIDS and malaria combined.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to the report titled [inside]The Growing Danger of Non-Communicable Diseases: Acting Now to Reverse Course (2011)[/inside], September, The World Bank, please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/The%20Growing%20Danger%20of%20Non-Communicable%20Diseases.pdf" title="The Growing Danger of Non-Communicable Diseases">click here</a> to access:</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> &bull; Heart disease, cancer, diabetes, chronic respiratory conditions, and other non-communicable diseases (NCDs) increasingly threaten the physical health and economic security of many lower-and middle-income countries.<br /> <br /> &bull; The change in mortality and disease levels will be particularly substantial in Sub-Saharan Africa, where NCDs will account for 46 percent of all deaths by 2030, up from 28 percent in 2008, and in South Asia, which will see the share of deaths from NCDs increase from 51 to 72 percent during the same period. More than 30 percent of these deaths will be premature and preventable. These lower-income countries will, at the same time, continue to grapple with the widespread prevalence of communicable diseases such as HIV, malaria, tuberculosis, and mother and child conditions, and so face a &ldquo;double burden&rdquo; of disease not experienced by their wealthier counterparts.<br /> <br /> &bull; The potential cost of NCDs to economies, health systems, households and individuals in middle- and lower-income countries is high. In many middle- and lower-income countries, NCDs are affecting populations at younger ages, resulting in longer periods of ill-health, premature deaths and greater loss of productivity that is so vital for development.<br /> <br /> &bull; Much of the rise in NCDs in developing countries is attributable to modifiable risk factors such as physical inactivity, malnutrition in the first thousand days of life and later an unhealthy diet (including excessive salt, fat, and sugar intake), tobacco use, alcohol abuse, and exposure to environmental pollution.<br /> <br /> &bull; Country evidence suggests that more than half of the NCD burden could be avoided through effective health promotion and disease prevention programs that tackle such risk factors. Particularly effective at very low costs are measures to curb tobacco, such as taxes, as indicated in the &ldquo;WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control&rdquo;, and to reduce salt in processed and semi processed foods.<br /> <br /> &bull; By 2030, cancer incidence is projected to increase by 70 percent in middle-income countries and 82 percent in lower-income countries.<br /> <br /> &bull; While increases in NCD-related mortality and ill-health in part reflect countries&rsquo; successes in extending lives and curbing communicable diseases, a significant part of the increase is a result of modifiable risk factors, many of which are linked to modernization, urbanization, and lifestyle changes.<br /> <br /> &bull; The rise of NCDs amongst younger populations may jeopardize many countries&rsquo; &ldquo;demographic dividend&rdquo;, including the economic benefits expected to be generated during the period when a relatively larger part of the population is of working age. Instead, these countries will have to contend with the costs associated with populations that are living with longer episodes of illhealth.<br /> <br /> &bull; Cardiovascular disease is already a major cause of death and disability in South Asia, where the average age of first-time heart attack sufferers is 53 compared to 59 in the rest of the world.<br /> <br /> &bull; A recent study illustrated the economic impact of NCDs in India by estimating that if NCDs were &ldquo;eliminated&rdquo;, the country&rsquo;s 2004 GDP would have been 4 to 10 percent greater.<br /> <br /> &bull; The share of out-of-pocket household health expenditures on NCDs in India increased from 32 percent to 47 percent between 1995&ndash;1996 and 2004. Moreover, 40 percent of these expenditures were financed by borrowing and sales of assets, increasing the household&rsquo;s financial vulnerability. NCDs also increase the risk of households incurring &ldquo;catastrophic&rdquo; health costs. In South Asia, the chance of incurring catastrophic hospitalization expenditures was 160 percent higher for cancer patients and 30 percent higher for those with cardiovascular diseases than it was for those with a communicable disease requiring hospitalization .<br /> <br /> &bull; Because of their specific characteristics, NCDs affect adults&mdash;often in their productive years, require costly long term treatment and care, and often are accompanied by some degree of disability. Therefore, they could potentially have greater socio-economic impact than other health conditions. Increased NCD levels can: reduce labor supply and outputs, increase costs to employers (from absenteeism and higher health care coverage costs), lower returns on human capital investments, reduced domestic consumption and lower tax revenues, as well as increased public health and social welfare expenditures.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to the report titled: [inside]AIDS at 30: Nations at the crossroads (2011)[/inside], which has been brought out by UNAIDS, please <a href="http://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/media_asset/aids-at-30_1.pdf">click here</a> to access:&nbsp;&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; The number of people living with HIV was around 34 million worldwide in 2010.<br /> <br /> &bull; There were 2.6 million new HIV infections worldwide in 2009.<br /> <br /> &bull; Between 1981 and 2000, the number of people living with HIV rose from less than one million to an estimated 27.5 million [26&ndash;29 million].<br /> <br /> &bull; Low- and middle-income countries accounted for 95% or more of the global HIV burden by 1998.<br /> <br /> &bull; While less than 1% of adults in South Africa were living with HIV in 1990, 16.1% were living with HIV a decade later. During the same period, adult HIV prevalence rose from less than 1% to 24.5% in Lesotho, and from 3.5% to 26% in Botswana.<br /> <br /> &bull; Half of HIV infections in Eastern Europe and Central Asia in 2010 were due to drug users sharing needles.<br /> <br /> &bull; Clinical trials show that male circumcision reduces the chance of men becoming HIV-positive by about 60%.<br /> <br /> &bull; Beginning in 2005, a series of randomized controlled trials in sub-Saharan Africa found that circumsising adult men reduced their risk of infection by about 60%.<br /> <br /> &bull; Scientific knowledge about HIV expanded steadily in the years 1981&ndash;2000. The virus was identified in 1983, and the first serologic test became available in 1985. In the 1990s, studies demonstrated in developed and low- and middle-income countries the possibility of significantly lowering the risk of vertical transmission.<br /> <br /> &bull; Today, 94% of countries (162 of 172 countries reporting) have national HIV strategic plans, up from 87% in 2006. The coordination of national responses also improved during the epidemic&rsquo;s third decade. Two out of three (67%) countries in 2010 reported having a single HIV monitoring and evaluation system, up from 46% in 2006, although country reports cite insufficient coordination of diverse partners as a continuing challenge to national responses.<br /> <br /> &bull; According to the latest UNGASS reports, AIDS expenditures in 2009 totalled US$ 1.07 billion. Estimates based on the methodology suggested by the Commission on AIDS in Asia indicate that US$ 3.3 billion is needed for a targeted response across the region.<br /> <br /> &bull; There was a significant increase in investment in the HIV response in low- and middle-income countries between 2001 and 2009, with total expenditure rising nearly 10-fold, from US$ 1.6 billion to US$ 15.9 billion.<br /> <br /> &bull; Public and private domestic resources accounted for 52% of total spending on HIV programmes in low- and middle-income countries in 2009, but many low-income countries remain heavily dependent on external financing. In 56 countries, international donors supply at least 70% of HIV resources. This pattern potentially encourages the emergence of new global inequities, as millions of people in sub-Saharan Africa now rely on external donors on a daily basis for the drugs and services that keep them alive.<br /> <br /> &bull; The UNAIDS Domestic Investment Priority Index, a formula that accounts for total HIV burden and government resources, shows that eight of 14 countries in West and Central Africa, six of 16 countries in Eastern and Southern Africa, and all but four countries in Asia were allocating inadequate resources to HIV in&nbsp; 2009.<br /> <br /> &bull; According to research from nine countries under the People Living with HIV Stigma Index, 53% of Rwandans living with HIV have been verbally insulted, 33% of rural Zambians living with HIV have experienced physical violence, and 65% of Rwandans living with HIV have lost a job or income opportunity. Furthermore, women living with HIV from various countries report abuses of their sexual and reproductive health and rights. Nearly 20% of women in Namibia who participated in discussions and interviews with the International Community of Women Living with HIV (ICW), reported that they had been coerced or forced into sterilization. Such deep-seated social ostracism and discriminatory actions discourage people from being tested for HIV or seeking other needed services.<br /> <br /> &bull; Among young women in South Africa, experience of intimate partner violence increases the odds of becoming infected with HIV by 11.9%, while gender inequality within a relationship increases the risk by 13.9%, according to a study reported in The Lancet in 2010.<br /> <br /> &bull; According to the UNAIDS Global Report 2010, the proportion of countries reporting programmes to address stigma and discrimination increased from 39% in 2006 to 92% in 2010, although a budget for these programmes was in place in less than half of these countries.<br /> <br /> &bull; More than 56 countries have laws that specifically criminalize HIV transmission or exposure, with the majority of prosecutions reported in high-income countries. As of April 2011, 47 countries, territories and areas imposed some form of restriction on the entry, stay and residence of people living with HIV. However, in a more positive development, China, Namibia and USA lifted their HIV-related travel restrictions in 2010, while Ecuador and India clarified that no such restrictions were in place.<br /> <br /> &bull; In 116 countries, territories and areas, some aspect of sex work is criminalized. Seventy-nine countries and territories worldwide criminalize consensual same-sex sexual relations, including 85% of countries in Eastern and Southern Africa, 81% in the Middle East and North Africa, and 69% in the Caribbean.<br /> <br /> &bull; Thirty-two countries have laws that allow for the death penalty for drug-related offences, and 27 provide for the compulsory detention of people who use drugs, often without due process or minimum standards of detention or treatment. Such laws, as well as abusive law enforcement and poor access to legal services, deter individuals from seeking needed services, increase their vulnerability to becoming HIV-positive, and intensify their social isolation.<br /> <br /> &bull; As of December 2010, an estimated 6.6 million people in low- and middle-income countries were receiving antiretroviral therapy, an increase of 1.4 million from a year earlier. Between 2001 and 2010, the number of people receiving antiretroviral treatment rose nearly 22-fold, a vivid illustration of the power of international solidarity, innovative approaches and people-centred responses.<br /> <br /> &bull; In sub-Saharan Africa the number of people receiving antiretroviral treatment in 2010 increased by 31%; in the Middle East and North Africa, that figure was 21%.<br /> <br /> &bull; As of December 2009, seven countries had already reached at least 80% of treatment-eligible individuals with antiretroviral treatment. Eighteen countries reported treatment coverage of at least 60%.<br /> <br /> &bull; Since its emergence in 1996, highly active anti retroviral therapy has saved an estimated 14.4 million life years worldwide as of December 2009. Although 54% of life-years saved between 1995 and 2009 were in Western Europe and North America, where antiretroviral therapy has long been available, 3.7 million life-years have been saved in sub-Saharan Africa. The pace of reducing morbidity and mortality in sub-Saharan Africa has accelerated since 2005 as a result of dramatic programme scale-up.<br /> <br /> &bull; In 2009, nearly one in five people (18%) who started antiretroviral therapy in low- and middle-income countries were no longer in care 12 months later.<br /> <br /> &bull; At present, more than 95% of patients on treatment are on first-generation antiretroviral medicines, the majority of which are off-patent. As drug resistance increases over time, more patients will require second- and third-generation medicines. Most of these more recent medicines will remain under patent protection for years to come, resulting in potentially drastic increases in treatment costs. This can be alleviated to a large extent by making use of the flexibilities of public health related TRIPS (trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights). In March 2011, UNAIDS, WHO and UNDP issued a policy brief calling on all countries to use TRIPS flexibilities to lower costs and improve access to HIV treatment. By 2005, five years after affordable means of preventing vertical transmission became available, only 15% of HIV-positive pregnant women in low- and middle-income countries received antiretroviral prophylaxis.<br /> <br /> &bull; More than 50% of pregnant women who tested positive for HIV in 2010 were assessed for their eligibility to receive antiretroviral therapy for their own health. These gains in reducing vertical transmission have helped to reduce childhood mortality. The number of children newly infected with HIV in 2009 (370 000 [230 000&ndash;510 000]) was 26% lower than in 2001.<br /> <br /> &bull; According to the most recent population-based surveys in low- and middle-income countries with available data, only 24% of young women and 36% of young men responded correctly when asked five questions about HIV prevention methods and popular misconceptions about HIV transmission. Young women tend to be less likely than young men to be aware of the prevention benefits of consistent condom use. When prompted, 74% of young males in DHS surveys knew that using a condom helps to prevent HIV infection, while only 49% of young females knew the right answer. Some 78% of young males also knew that having a single, faithful partner lowers the risk of HIV infection, compared to only 59% of young females.<br /> <br /> &bull; In 14 countries where HIV prevalence exceeds 2% and where nationally representative data are available, more than 70% of men and women who had high-risk sex in the past year report not using a condom the last time they had sex.<br /> <br /> &bull; Globally, HIV prevalence levels above those reported in the general population have been documented among men who have sex with men (MSM), transgender people, people who inject drugs (IDUs), and sex workers.<br /> <br /> &bull; According to the most recently available data, the proportion of countries reporting that they conduct systematic surveillance of HIV among key populations increased between 2008 and 2010: for sex workers, from 44% to 50%; for MSM, from 30% to 36%; while among IDUs it remained stable at 28%.<br /> <br /> &bull; An estimated 20% of the 15.9 million IDUs worldwide are living with HIV. This statistic underscores the world&rsquo;s failure to put the lessons of harm reduction to use. In at least 69 countries where injecting drug use has been documented, no programme to provide even sterile needles and syringes exists.<br /> <br /> &bull; The epidemic among MSM communities is a worldwide phenomenon, with 63 out of 67 countries reporting in 2009 a higher HIV prevalence among MSM compared with the general population.<br /> <br /> &bull; At least 79 countries, territories and areas have laws against male&ndash;male sexual contact, including some that authorize the death penalty.<br /> <br /> &bull; Among 56 countries reporting in both 2008 and 2010, median condom use with the most recent client reached 84%, with a range from about two thirds to nearly 100%.<br /> <br /> &bull; According to recent estimates, HIV is a leading cause of pregnancyrelated deaths, accounting for about 11% of all maternal deaths in 2008.<br /> <br /> &bull; HIV-positive newborns have about a 50% risk of death before age two in the absence of treatment.<br /> <br /> &bull; In 2009, HIV accounted for 2.1% (1.2&ndash;3.0%) of under-five deaths in low- and middle-income countries, a decline from 2.6% (1.6&ndash;3.5%) in 2000.<br /> <br /> &bull; In sub-Saharan Africa, HIV was responsible for 3.6% (2.0&ndash;5.0%) of all deaths in children under five in 2009. Here, too, striking achievements are evident, as the HIV share of all under-five deaths has sharply fallen from the 5.4% (3.3%&ndash;7.3%) reported in 2000.<br /> <br /> &bull; Universal access to effective prevention, diagnosis and treatment for HIV-related tuberculosis (TB) could prevent up to one million TB deaths in people living with HIV between now and 2015, but the world is falling far short of this target.<br /> <br /> &bull; Only 28% of TB patients globally knew their HIV status in 2009, and only 5% of people living with HIV were screened for TB. Although early initiation of antiretroviral therapy significantly reduces the risk of death among HIV-positive people with TB, only 37% of these HIV-positive TB patients got HIV therapy in 2009.<br /> <br /> &bull; According to data compiled by WHO, 10 countries accounted for more than 69% of all people with HIV-related TB in 2009.<br /> <br /> &bull; 25% of all TB deaths are in people with HIV, and there are one million cases of TB in people with HIV a year.<br /> <br /> &bull; Between 2001 and 2009, global HIV incidence steadily declined, with the annual rate of new infections falling by nearly 25%.<br /> <br /> &bull; Above-average declines in HIV incidence have occurred in sub-Saharan Africa and in South and South-East Asia, while Latin America and the Caribbean and Oceania regions experienced more modest reductions of less than 25%.<br /> <br /> &bull; Rates of new infections have remained relatively stable in East Asia, Western and Central Europe, and North America. HIV incidence has steadily increased in the Middle East and North Africa, while in Eastern Europe and Central Asia, a decline in new infections was reversed mid-decade, with incidence rising slightly from 2005 to 2009.<br /> <br /> &bull; Coverage of services to prevent new child infections increased from 15% in 2005 to 54% in 2009. The HIV incidence rate declined by more than 25% between 2001 and 2009. Antiretroviral treatment coverage is increasing.<br /> <br /> &bull; Some 22.5 million people now live with HIV in Africa. The majority (60%) are women and girls. HIV prevalence is as high as 25% in some countries, and the rate of people becoming newly infected outpaces treatment access. Of the 16.6 million children globally who have lost one or both parents to an AIDS-related illness, 14.9 million are in Africa.<br /> <br /> &bull; The Asia Pacific region has made significant progress in controlling HIV&rsquo;s spread. The number of people living with HIV has remained stable for the past five years and estimated new infections are 20% lower than in 2001. Thailand, Cambodia and certain parts of India have turned their epidemics around by providing quality services to their key populations at higher risk.<br /> <br /> &bull; In 2009, median reported prevention coverage for people who inject drugs was 17%; for men who have sex with men 36.5%; and for female sex workers 41%. Programmes in key affected populations to prevent transmission to intimate sexual partners are severely lacking.<br /> <br /> **page**<br /> &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Please <a href="https://im4change.org/hunger-hdi/sdgs-113.html?pgno=5#trends-in-maternal-mortality-1990-to-2008-estimates">click here</a> to access the Trends in Maternal Mortality: 1990 to 2008 Estimates developed by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA and The World Bank:</span><br /> &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">According to [inside]A Fair Chance at Life: Why Equity Matters for Children (2010)[/inside], which has been prepared by Save the Children, please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/A%20fair%20chance%20of%20life.pdf" title="A fair chance of life">click here</a> to access:</span><br /> <span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp; </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;In 2000, the world&rsquo;s governments committed themselves to make a two-thirds reduction in the child mortality rate by 2015 &ndash; the fourth of eight United Nations Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). But with five years to go before the target date, the world is collectively off track to reach MDG 4. Just 40% of the necessary progress has been achieved so far, and in three-quarters of countries the goal will be missed on current trends.&nbsp; </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The child mortality rate at a global level has fallen by just 28% since the MDG baseline year of 1990, far short of the 67% reduction required to meet the goal. Less than 30% of countries are making equitable progress towards MDG 4.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Ghana, Mozambique, Niger, Egypt, Indonesia, Bolivia and Zambia have made equitable progress in reducing child mortality. Chad, Congo, Kenya, South Africa and Zimbabwe have actually seen increases in their child mortality rates since 1990. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;In sub-Saharan Africa, close to one child in seven still dies before their fifth birthday. Although the mortality rate in sub-Saharan Africa has fallen, high fertility levels mean that the absolute number of child deaths in the region has increased since 1990, from 4.2 to 4.6 million.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Almost all child deaths &ndash; 99% &ndash; happen in the developing world. A person born in sub-Saharan Africa can expect to live, on average, 52 years. In western Europe, life expectancy is 80 years. The life expectancy rates in sub-Saharan Africa today have not been seen in Europe since the beginning of the 20th century. In 40 developing countries, children have less chance of living to the age of five than a person in the UK has of living to the age of 65.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Sri Lanka &ndash; with a per capita income of $1,790 &ndash; has a child mortality rate of 13, less than half the level in Guatemala, which has a per capita income of $2,680. Gabon has an equivalent per capita income to Argentina, but a child mortality rate of 57, almost four times higher.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;In India, high levels of selective abortion contribute to skewed male-to-female birth ratios. Son preference in India and China can result in high mortality among girls because they are not adequately breastfed or given the same access to medical treatment. A study of 4,000 children aged between one and two in India found that the likelihood of girls being fully vaccinated was five percentage points lower than that for boys. In Gujarat, India, 50% of women feel they need the permission of their husband or parent-in-law before taking their sick child to a doctor.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;High child mortality, illness and malnutrition can be a brake on economic and social development. Children who are sick and undernourished, especially in the first two years of life, often pay a life-long and irreversible price in terms of physical stunting and reduced cognitive ability.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;On the positive side, of the 68 &lsquo;Countdown to 2015&rsquo; countries (which together account for 97% of maternal and child deaths worldwide), 60 have reduced child mortality since 1990. A recent study found that the rate of reduction has accelerated since 2000, compared with the period from 1990 to 2000.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Of the 68 &lsquo;Countdown to 2015&rsquo; priority countries, only 19 are on-track to reach MDG 4. Eleven more are making faster-than-average progress, but still not enough progress to achieve MDG 4 by 2015.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;It is estimated that children under five make up 85% of those who die as a result of climate change; 44% of child deaths happen in countries considered fragile; and nearly 70% of the countries with the highest child mortality burden are currently experiencing or have experienced armed violence in the last two decades.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Inadequate care before birth and during delivery contributes to 40% of child deaths. Even babies who survive the neonatal period (up to 28 days) have greatly reduced chances of surviving beyond the age of five if their mothers die, in part because they are less likely to receive adequate nutrition and healthcare.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Although the percentage of stunted children decreased globally from 40% to 27% between 1990 and 2010, the number of stunted children is projected to increase in many areas. In Africa, the number of stunted children is estimated to have increased from 45 million in 1990 to 60 million in 2010.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Undernutrition among pregnant women in developing countries leads to one in six infants being born with low birth weight, which not only carries a high risk of neonatal death, but can also permanently damage long-term cognitive and physical development.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Infectious diseases accounted for an estimated 68% of the 8.8 million child deaths in 2008, with pneumonia accounting for 18% and diarrhoea for 15% of the global total. More than 40% of deaths from pneumonia and diarrhoea take place in sub-Saharan Africa, where 42% of people lack access to an improved water source, and almost 70% are without adequate sanitation.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Improved drinking water sources and proper sanitation are crucial to reducing child deaths from diarrhoea, while an estimated 45% of cases could be prevented by simple hand washing with soap.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;If women and men had equal status, it is estimated that the proportion of underweight children below the age of three years would fall by 13 percentage points globally.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">According to [inside]Women on the Front Lines of Health Care, State of the World&#39;s Mothers 2010[/inside], </span><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Women%20on%20the%20front%20line.pdf" title="Women on the front line">click here</a> to access</span><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">: </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Every year, 50 million women in the developing world give birth with no professional help and 8.8 million children and newborns die from easily preventable or treatable causes. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Worldwide, there are 57 countries with critical health workforce shortages, meaning that they have fewer than 23 doctors, nurses and midwives per 10,000 people. Thirty-six of these countries are in sub-Saharan Africa. Making up for these shortages would require an additional 2.4 million doctors, nurses and midwives.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Thirty-six of the countries with critical health worker shortages are in sub-Saharan Africa, which has 12 percent of the world&rsquo;s population, 25 percent of the global burden of disease, and only 3 percent of the world&rsquo;s health workers. South and East Asia have 29 percent of the disease burden and only 12 percent of the health workers.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;41 percent of the child deaths occur among newborn babies in the first month of life.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;99 percent of child and maternal deaths occur in developing countries where mothers and children lack access to basic health-care services.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;250,000 women&rsquo;s lives and 5.5 million children&rsquo;s lives could be saved each year if all women and children had access to a full package of essential health care.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Every year 8.8 million children die before reaching age 5.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Every year 343,000 women lose their lives due to pregnancy or childbirth complications.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;An additional 4.3 million health workers are needed in developing countries to help save lives and meet the health-related Millennium Development Goals.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The eleventh annual Mothers&rsquo; Index helps document conditions for mothers and children in 160 countries &ndash; 43 developed nations and 117 in the developing world &ndash; and shows where mothers fare best and where they face the greatest hardships.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;European countries &ndash; along with New Zealand and Australia &ndash; dominate the top positions while countries in sub-Saharan Africa dominate the lowest tier.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">According to [inside]Performance Audit-Report No. 8 of 2009-10[/inside], please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Performace%20Audit.pdf" title="Performance audit NRHM">click here</a> to access:</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;This is the latest and an extremely significant report on the status and performance of the National Rural Health Mission (NRHM) all over India providing clues for areas of concern and immediate action. Some of the salient features are as follows:</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The performance audit on implementation of the NRHM was conducted during April-December 2008 in the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, State Health Societies (SHS) of 33 States/UTs, District Health Societies (DHS) of 129 districts and 2369 health centres at block and village levels covering the period from 2005-06 to 2007-08.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The NRHM initiated decentralised bottom-up planning. This, however, had been hindered by non-completion of household and facility surveys and State specific perspective plans. In nine States, district level annual plans were not prepared during 2005-08 and in 24 States/UTs block and village level annual plans had not been prepared at all.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Village level health and sanitation committees were still to be constituted in nine States. The Rogi Kalyan Samitis (RKS) formed at many health centres, aiming at community ownership of healthcare delivery systems, were characterised by weak or absent grievance redressal mechanisms, outreach and awareness generation efforts.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;No RKS in any State/UT received all the stipulated central grants. In 13 States/UTs, the Samiti failed to generate internal resources, while in the remaining States no mechanism existed to monitor the generation of a third of the RKS funds from internal resources as prescribed.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The participation of Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs) in the Mission&rsquo;s activities had not been facilitated and their contribution towards capacity building and service delivery was not effectively monitored. 71 per cent of the districts countrywide were yet to be covered under the Mother NGO scheme.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;During the period 2005-06 to 2007-08, the total outlay/expenditure on the NRHM was Rs. 24,151.45 crore. During the first two years the Centre was contributing 100 per cent of the funds. Thereafter, the States were to contribute 15 per cent of funds during the 11th Five Year Plan (2007-12). However, many of the States were yet to contribute their share to the Mission and this issue needs to be addressed. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Many high focus States where diseases are endemic and health indicators poor, were however, receiving relatively lesser central grants, as high unspent balances of previous years remained, indicating that capacity building needs to be focused on.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Basic facilities (proper buildings, hygienic environment, electricity and water supply etc.) were still absent in many existing health centres with many Primary Health Centres (PHCs) and Community Health Centres (CHCs) being unable to provide guaranteed services such as inpatient services, operation theatres, labour rooms, pathological tests, X-ray facilities and emergency care etc.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;While contract workers have been engaged to fill vacancies, there are still shortages of specialist doctors at CHCs, adequate staff nurses at CHCs/PHCs and Auxiliary Nursing Midwife (ANMs)/ Multi-purpose Worker (MPWs) at Sub Centres.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;In nine States, the stock of essential drugs, contraceptives and vaccines adequate for two months consumption as required under norms were not available in any of the test checked PHCs and CHCs.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Despite holding two National Immunisation Days, six Special National Immunisation Days (and additional rounds in selected districts of Bihar and Uttar Pradesh), 1640 new polio cases had been detected in 17 States/UTs during 2005-08.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> <span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">According to [inside]&lsquo;Diarrhoea: Why children are still dying and what can be done?&rsquo; (2009)[/inside], please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Diarrhoea%20Why%20children%20are%20still%20dying%20and%20what%20can%20be%20done.pdf" title="Diarrhoea Why children are still dying and what can be done">click here</a> to access:</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Diarrhoea is defined as having loose or watery stools at least three times per day, or more frequently than normal for an individual. Though most episodes of childhood diarrhoea are mild, acute cases can lead to death and other complications. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The leading cause of diarrhea is lack of sanitation and safe drinking water and the life threatening disease is very easily curable with simple tablets and rehydration. (An estimated 88 per cent of diarrhoeal deaths worldwide are attributable to unsafe water, inadequate sanitation and poor hygiene.)</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Most pathogens that cause diarrhoea share a similar mode of transmission &ndash; from the stool of one person to the mouth of another.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;In India, under-five mortality rate (per 1000 live births) was 69 during 2008. The number of under-five deaths was 18,30,000 during 2008. The percentage of children under-five with diarrhoea receiving ORS packet during 2005-2008 was 26%.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Nearly, nine million children under five years of age die each year. Diarrhoea is second only to pneumonia as the cause of these deaths.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Reducing these deaths depends largely on delivering life-saving treatment of low-osmolarity oral rehydration salts (ORS) and zinc tablets to all children in need.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Examples of rehydrating fluids include cereal-based drinks made from a thin gruel of rice, maize, potato or other readily available low-cost grain or root crop the family has at home. Breastmilk is also an excellent drink for fluid replacement and should continue to be given to infants with diarrhoea simultaneously with other oral rehydration solutions.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;According to the latest available figures, an estimated 2.5 billion people lack improved sanitation facilities, and nearly one billion people do not have access to safe drinking water. These unsanitary environments allow diarrhoea-causing pathogens to spread more easily.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Globally, 1.2 billion people practise open defecation, 83 per cent of whom live in 13 countries</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Together, pneumonia and diarrhoea are responsible for an estimated 40 per cent of all child deaths around the world each year.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Nearly 1 in 4 people in developing countries were practising indiscriminate or open defecation in 2006.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Nearly one in five child deaths &ndash; about 1.5 million each year &ndash; is due to diarrhoea. It kills more young children than AIDS, malaria and measles combined.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Between 1990 and 2006, the proportion of the developing world&rsquo;s population using an improved drinking water source rose from 71 per cent to 84 per cent. Still, almost 1 billion people lack access to improved drinking water sources, and many households do not treat or safely store their household water supplies.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The prevention package highlights five main elements that require a concerted approach in their implementation. The package includes: a) rotavirus and measles vaccinations, b) promotion of early and exclusive breastfeeding and vitamin A supplementation, c) promotion of handwashing with soap, d) improved water supply quantity and quality, including treatment and safe storage of household water, and e) community-wide sanitation promotion.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Mortality from diarrhoea has declined over the past two decades from an estimated 5 million deaths among children under five to 1.5 million deaths in 2004 </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Africa and South Asia are home to more than 80 per cent of child deaths due to diarrhoea</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Improving sanitation facilities has been associated with an estimated median reduction in diarrhoea incidence of 36 per cent across reviewed studies.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Interventions to improve water quality at the source, along with treatment of household water and safe storage systems, have been shown to reduce diarrhoea incidence by as much as 47 per cent.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Diarrhoea often leads to stunting in children due to its association with poor nutrient absorption and appetite loss.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Breastmilk contains the nutrients, antioxidants, hormones and antibodies needed by a child to survive and develop.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Undernourished children are more likely to suffer from diarrhoea and its consequences, which, in turn, increases their chances of worsening nutritional status. Today, 129 million children under the age of five in the developing world are underweight for their age. Together, Africa and South Asia account for more than 80 per cent of total underweight children (25 per cent and 57 per cent, respectively). About 40 per cent of children under five years of age are stunted in Africa, and nearly half in South Asia.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Only 37 per cent of infants in developing countries are exclusively breastfed for the first six months of life.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Boys and girls are equally likely to receive ORS to treat diarrhoea. Children in urban areas (39 percent) are more likely to receive ORS than those living in rural areas (31 per cent). Similarly, children from the wealthiest families are 1.5 times as likely to receive ORS to treat their diarrhoea as the poorest children</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">**page**<em>&nbsp;</em></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">According to the [inside]World Health Statistics 2009[/inside], please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/World%20Health%20Statistics%202009.pdf" title="World Health Statistics 2009">click here</a> to access:</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp; </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The proportion of under-nourished children under five years of age declined from 27% in 1990 to 20% in 2005. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Some 27% fewer children died before their fifth birthday in 2007 than in 1990. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Maternal mortality has barely changed since 1990. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;One third of 9.7 million people in developing countries who need treatment for HIV/AIDS were receiving it in 2007. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;MDG target for reducing the incidence of tuberculosis was met globally in 2004. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;27 countries reported a reduction of up to 50% in the number of malaria cases between 1990 and 2006. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The number of people with access to safe drinking-water rose from 4.1 billion in 1990 to 5.7 billion in 2006. About 1.1 billion people in developing regions gained access to improved sanitation in the same period. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Globally, the proportion of children under five years of age suffering from under-nutrition, according to WHO Child Growth Standards, declined from 27% in 1990 to 20% in 2005. But, the progress is uneven, and an estimated 112 million children are underweight. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Globally, the number of children who die before their fifth birthday has been reduced by 27% from 12.5 million estimated in 1990 to 9 million in 2007. This reduction is due to a combination of interventions, including the use of insecticide-treated mosquito nets for malaria, oral rehydration therapy for diarrhoea, increased access to vaccines for a number of infectious diseases and improved water and sanitation. But pneumonia and diarrhoea continue to kill 3.8 million children aged under five each year, although both conditions are preventable and treatable.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The global maternal mortality ratio of 400 maternal deaths per 100 000 live births in 2005 has barely changed since 1990. Every year an estimated 536 000 women die in pregnancy or childbirth. Most of these deaths occur in sub-Saharan Africa where the maternal mortality ratio is 900 per 100 000 births and where there has been no measurable improvement since 1990. A woman in Africa may face a 1-in-26 lifetime risk of death during pregnancy and childbirth, compared with only 1 in 7300 in the developed regions. 1 There are, however, signs of progress in some countries in Asia and Latin America and the Caribbean.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The percentage of adults living with HIV worldwide has remained stable since 2000 but there were an estimated 2.7 million new infections during 2007. Moreover, deaths are increasing in parts of Africa, particularly eastern and southern Africa. The use of antiretroviral therapy has increased; in 2007, about 1 million more people living with HIV received the treatment. That means one third of the estimated 9.7 million people in developing countries who need the treatment were receiving it. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The MDG target for reducing the incidence of tuberculosis was met globally in 2004. Since then, incidence has continued to fall slowly. Thanks to early detection of new cases and effective treatment using the WHO-recommended DOTS treatment strategy, treatment success rates have been consistently improving, with rates rising from 79% in 1990 to 85% in 2006. Multi-drug resistant tuberculosis is a challenge in countries, such as those of the former Soviet Union, while the lethal combination of HIV and tuberculosis is an issue particularly for sub-Saharan African countries. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Efforts to control malaria are beginning to pay off with significant increases in the proportion of children sleeping under insecticide-treated mosquito nets. Although it is still too early to register the global impact, 27 countries &ndash; including five in Africa &ndash; have reported a reduction of up to 50% in malaria cases between 1990 and 2006. In 2006, the number of cases was estimated to be 250 million globally. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Progress has been made in treating neglected tropical diseases that affect some 1.2 billion people. For example, only 9585 cases of dracunculiasis (guinea-worm disease) were reported in the five countries where the disease is endemic, compared with an estimated 3.5 million reported in 20 such countries in 1985. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The number of people with access to safe drinking water rose from an estimated 4.1 billion in 1990 to 5.7 billion in 2006. But 900 million people still had to rely on water from what are known as unimproved sources, for example surface water or an unprotected dug well.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Since 1990, an estimated 1.1 billion people in developing regions have gained access to improved sanitation. In 1990, just under 3 billion people had access to sanitation. Their number rose to more than 4 billion by 2006. Yet, in 2006 some 2.5 billion did not have access to improved sanitation and 1.2 billion had to practise open defecation. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Although nearly all developing countries publish an essential medicines list, the availability of medicines at public health facilities is often poor. Surveys in about 30 developing countries show that availability of selected medicines at health facilities was only 35% in the public sector and 63% in the private sector. Lack of medicines in the public sector often means patients have no choice but to purchase them privately or do without treatment. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">According to [inside]National Family Health Survey-III (2005-06)[/inside], </span><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">please <a href="http://rchiips.org/NFHS/nfhs3.shtml" title="http://rchiips.org/NFHS/nfhs3.shtml">click here</a> to access:<br /> <br /> <u><strong>NFHS III reports declining status of nutrition amidst women</strong></u></span><br /> &nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">The NFHS III paints a mixed picture of India&rsquo;s overall reproductive health status. Women are having fewer children and infant mortality has dropped in the seven-year period since the last NFHS survey in 1998-99. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Anaemia and malnutrition are still widespread among children and adults. And, in an unusual juxtaposition, more adults, especially urban women, are overweight or obese than they were seven years ago. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> <span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:medium"><u><strong>Trend in Family Planning and Fertility</strong></u> </span></span><br /> &nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Fertility has continued to decline since NFHS-2, dropping to an average of 2.7 children from 2.9 children. Ten states, mostly in Southern India, have reached replacement level or below replacement level fertility. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">While son preference remains a barrier to more rapid decline in fertility, an increasing number of women who have only daughters say that they want no more children. In NFHS-3, 62% of women with two daughters and no sons say they want no more children, compared with 47% in NFHS-2. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Declining fertility could be attributed largely to women&rsquo;s increased use of contraception. For the first time ever, more than half of currently married women in India are using contraception, and their use of modern contraceptive methods increased from 43% to 49% between NFHS-2 and NFHS-3. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">A rise in the average age at marriage is also contributing to the drop in fertility. Forty-five percent of women ages 20-24 were married before the legal age of marriage of 18 years, compared with 50% seven years earlier. This shift in age at marriage also influences the median age at first birth, which increased by six months to 19.8 years. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> <span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:medium"><u><strong>Half of Women Lack Proper Care during Pregnancy and Delivery</strong></u></span></span><br /> &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;More than three-quarters of pregnant women in India received at least some antenatal care (ANC), but only half of women had at least three ANC visits with a health provider during their pregnancy. </span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull;&nbsp;The disparity between urban and rural women was especially pronounced, with 74% of urban women having ANC at least three times, compared with 43% of rural women. Births assisted by a health professional increased to 49% from 42%, with 75% of urban women but only 39% of rural women in NFHS-3 received assistance from a health professional.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull;&nbsp;Institutional births increased from 34% to 41%, but most women still deliver their children at home. Only about one-third of women received postnatal care within two days of delivery.<br /> <br /> <span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><u><strong>Infant Mortality Drops, but Full Immunization Coverage Shows Little Progress</strong></u></span></span></span></p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Infant mortality continues to decline, dropping from 68 in 1998-99 to 57 in 2005-06 per thousand births. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">There were particularly notable drops in the infant mortality rate in Bihar, Goa, Haryana, Jammu and Kashmir, Meghalaya, Orissa, Punjab, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, and Uttar Pradesh. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Overall, there was only a marginal improvement in full vaccination coverage, with 44% of children ages 12-23 months receiving all recommended vaccinations, up from 42% seven years earlier. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Substantial improvements in coverage have been made in all vaccinations except DPT, which did not change at all between NFHS-2 and NFHS-3. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Gains are particularly evident for polio vaccination coverage, but nearly one-quarter of children age 12-23 months did not receive three recommended doses. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Progress in vaccination coverage varies markedly among the states. In 11 states, there has been a substantial deterioration in full immunization coverage in the last seven years, due to a decline in vaccination coverage for both DPT and polio. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Large decline were seen in Maharashtra, Mizoram, Andhra Pradesh, and Punjab. On the other hand, there was major improvement in full immunization coverage in Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Sikkim, and West Bengal. Other states with marked improvements in full immunization coverage were Assam, Haryana, Jammu and Kashmir, Madhya Pradesh, Meghalaya, and Uttaranchal. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Diarrhoea continues to be a major health problem for many children.&nbsp; Although knowledge about Oral Rehydration Salts (ORS) for the treatment of diarrhoea is widespread among mothers, only 58% of children with diarrhoea were taken to a health facility, down from 65% seven years earlier. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">There has been a rise in the number of dispensaries and hospitals, nursing personnel and doctors (including primary health care centers) in between 1991 and 2005/06, as could be deciphered from the table below.</span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:medium"><u><strong>Trends in health care infrastructure</strong></u> </span></span></p> <div> <table align="justify" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" style="height:96px; width:417px"> <caption> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> </caption> <tbody> <tr> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp;</span></td> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:medium"><strong>1991 </strong></span></span></td> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:medium">&nbsp;<strong>2005/2006</strong></span></span></td> </tr> <tr> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp;SC/PHC/CHC (March 2006)</span></td> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp;57353</span></td> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp;171567</span></td> </tr> <tr> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp;Dispensaries and Hospitals (all) (1.4.2006)</span></td> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp;23555</span></td> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp;32156</span></td> </tr> <tr> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp;Nursing Personnel (2005)</span></td> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp;143887</span></td> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp;1481270</span></td> </tr> <tr> </tr> </tbody> </table> </div> ', 'credit_writer' => '', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 10, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'public-health-51', 'meta_title' => '', 'meta_keywords' => '', 'meta_description' => '', 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 51, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 21 $metaTitle = 'Hunger / HDI | Public Health' $metaKeywords = '' $metaDesc = 'KEY TRENDS&nbsp; &nbsp; &bull; The 2019&nbsp;India&nbsp;TB&nbsp;report&nbsp;says&nbsp;that the&nbsp;country&nbsp;accounted for a quarter of the global tuberculosis (TB) burden with an estimated 27 lakh cases in 2018. In 2018, the country was able to achieve a total notification of 21.5 lakh TB cases, of which...' $disp = '<p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">KEY TRENDS&nbsp;</span></p><p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p><div style="text-align:justify">&bull; The 2019&nbsp;India&nbsp;TB&nbsp;report&nbsp;says&nbsp;that the&nbsp;country&nbsp;accounted for a quarter of the global tuberculosis (TB) burden with an estimated 27 lakh cases in 2018. In 2018, the country was able to achieve a total notification of 21.5 lakh TB cases, of which 25 percent was from private sector. Majority of the TB burden is among the working age group. Nearly 89 percent of TB cases came from the age group 15-69 years. About 2/3rd of the TB patients were males <strong>*15</strong></div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify">&bull; Maternal Mortality Ratio for India was 370 in 2000, 286 in 2005, 210 in&nbsp; 2010, 158 in 2015 and 145 in 2017. Therefore, the MMRatio for the country reduced by almost 61 percent between 2000 and 2017. MMRatio for China was 59 in 2000, 44 in 2005, 36 in 2010, 30 in 2015 and 29 in 2017. Therefore, the MMRatio for China fell by around 51 percent between 2000 and 2017 <strong>*14</strong> &nbsp;<br />&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify">&bull; The per capita public expenditure (actual) on health in nominal terms has gone up from Rs. 621 in 2009-10 to Rs. 1,112 in 2015-16. Public expenditure on health (includes health sector expenditure by Centre and States/UTs) as a percentage of GDP was 1.02 percent in 2015-16. There is no significant change in public expenditure on health as a percentage of GDP since 2009-10. The Centre-State share in total public expenditure on health was 31:69 in 2015-16, which used to be 36:64 in 2009-10 <strong>*13</strong><br /><br />&bull; The North-Eastern states had the highest (viz. Rs. 2,878 per capita) and Empowered Action Group (EAG) states (including Assam) had the lowest (viz. Rs. 871 per capita) average per capita public expenditure on health in 2015-16 (excluding UTs). The North-Eastern states had the highest public health expenditure as a percentage of Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP) in 2015-16 (2.76 percent). Public health expenditure as a percentage of GSDP stood at 1.36 percent for EAG states (including Assam) and 0.76 percent for major non-EAG states <strong>*13</strong></div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify">&bull; Of the total disease burden in India in 1990, a tenth was caused by a group of risks including unhealthy diet, high blood pressure, high blood sugar, high cholesterol, and overweight, which mainly contribute to ischaemic heart disease, stroke, and diabetes. The contribution of this group of risks increased massively to a quarter of the total disease burden in India in 2016 <strong>*12</strong><br /><br />&bull; The Out-of-Pocket Expenditure (OOPE) on health by households is Rs. 3,02,425 crores (62.6 percent of total health expenditure, 2.4 percent of GDP, Rs. 2,394 per capita) for the year 2014-15. Private Health Insurance expenditure is Rs. 17,755 crores (3.7 percent of total health expenditure) for the year 2014-15 <strong>*11</strong><br /><br />&bull; Based on available evidence, cardiovascular disease (24 percent), chronic respiratory disease (11 percent), cancer (6 percent) and diabetes (2 percent) are the leading cause of mortality in India <strong>*10</strong><br />&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify">&bull; The total number of dengue cases in India has grown from 28,292 in 2010 to 40,425 in 2014. The total number of dengue related deaths stood at 131 in 2014 <strong>*10</strong></div><div style="text-align:justify"><br />&bull; The Proportion (per 1000) of Ailing Persons (PAP), measured as the number of living persons reporting ailments (per 1000 persons), was 89 persons in rural India and 118 persons in urban India <strong>*9</strong><br />&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify">&bull; Private doctors were the most important single source of non-hospitalized treatment in both the sectors (Rural &amp; Urban). More than 70% (72 per cent in the rural areas and 79 per cent in the urban areas) spells of ailment were treated in the private sector (consisting of private doctors, nursing homes, private hospitals, charitable institutions, etc.) <strong>*9</strong></div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify">&bull; It is observed that in rural India, 42 percent hospitalised treatment was carried out in public hospital and rest 58 percent in private hospital. For the urban India, the corresponding figures were 32 percent and 68 percent. It may be noted in this context that households (or persons within households) were segregated in sector (rural/urban) by their place of domicile, and not by the place of treatment <strong>*9</strong></div><p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p><div style="text-align:justify">&bull; Average medical expenditure per hospitalisation case: Higher amount was spent for treatment per hospitalised case by people in the private hospitals (Rs. 25850) than in the public hospitals (Rs. 6120). The highest expenditure was recorded for treatment of Cancer (Rs. 56712) followed by that for Cardio-vascular diseases (Rs. 31647). Average medical expenditure per non-hospitalisation case was Rs. 509 in rural India and Rs. 639 in urban India <strong>*9</strong><br /><br />&bull; As much as 86 percent of rural population and 82 percent of urban population were still not covered under any scheme of health expenditure support. Government, however, was able to bring about 12 percent urban and 13 percent rural population under health protection coverage through Rastriya Swasthya Bima Yojana (RSBY) or similar plan. Only 12 percent households of the 5th quintile class (Usual Monthly Per Capita Consumer Expenditure) of urban area had some arrangement of medical insurance from private provider <strong>*9</strong></div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify">&bull; The draft National Health Policy 2015 proposes a potentially achievable target of raising public health expenditure to 2.5% of the GDP. It also notes that 40% of this would need to come from Central expenditures. At current prices, a target of 2.5% of GDP translates to Rs. 3800 per capita, representing an almost four fold increase in five years <strong>*8</strong><br />&nbsp;<br />&bull; Maternal mortality ratio (MMR)* in India stood at 560 maternal deaths (per 100000 live births) during 1990, 460 during 1995, 370 during 2000, 280 during 2005 and 190 during 2013. India could reduce MMR by 65 percent between 1990 and 2013<strong> *7</strong><br /><br />&bull; At the country level, the two countries that accounted for one third of all global maternal deaths are India at 17 percent (50000) and Nigeria at 14 percent (40000)<strong> *7</strong><br /><br />&bull; U5MR in India declined by 55 percent from 126 in 1990 to 56 in 2012. Infant Mortality Rate declined from 88 in 1990 to 44 in 2012. Neonatal mortality rate declined from 51 in 1990 to 31 in 2012. U5MR in India among boys declined from 121 in 1990 to 54 in 2012. U5MR in India among girls declined from 130 in 1990 to 59 in 2012. The share of neonatal deaths in under-five deaths stood at 55 percent in 2012 as compared to 41 percent in 1990 <strong>*6</strong><br /><br />&bull; Pneumonia is the leading cause of child mortality in India, responsible for the deaths of nearly 400,000 children under five in 2010 <strong>*5</strong><br /><br />&bull; The Indian Commission on Macroeconomics and Health notes that, in India, 13 household person-days per patient were lost per episode of malaria. Furthermore, the commission estimated that the overall monetary losses to families (income losses together with treatment expenses) could amount to between 200 and 400 Indian rupees (US$ 3.5 to 7) <strong>*4</strong><br /><br />&bull; Odisha is one of the most highly malaria-endemic states in India, accounting for 24% of reported cases in 2010 despite consisting of less of than 4% of the national population. Malaria is particularly common among tribal groups which represent 44% of the population of Orissa <strong>*4</strong><br /><br />&bull; Globally 12% of all deaths among adults aged 30 years and over were attributed to tobacco as compared with 16% in India, 17% in Pakistan and 31% in Bangladesh <strong>*3</strong><br /><br />&bull; A recent study illustrated the economic impact of Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs) in India by estimating that if NCDs like: heart disease, cancer, diabetes, chronic respiratory conditions, and other NCDs were &ldquo;eliminated&rdquo;, the country&rsquo;s 2004 GDP would have been 4 to 10 percent greater<strong> *2</strong><br /><br />&bull; The share of out-of-pocket household health expenditures on NCDs in India increased from 32 percent to 47 percent between 1995&ndash;1996 and 2004. Moreover, 40 percent of these expenditures were financed by borrowing and sales of assets, increasing the household&rsquo;s financial vulnerability<strong> *2</strong><br /><br />&bull; In NFHS-III, 62% of women with two daughters and no sons say they want no more children, compared with 47% in NFHS-II<strong> *1</strong></div><div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>15.</strong> 2019 India TB report, released in 2019, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, please <a href="https://tbcindia.gov.in/WriteReadData/India%20TB%20Report%202019.pdf" title="https://tbcindia.gov.in/WriteReadData/India%20TB%20Report%202019.pdf">click here</a> and <a href="https://tbcindia.gov.in/index1.php?lang=1&amp;level=1&amp;sublinkid=4160&amp;lid=2807" title="https://tbcindia.gov.in/index1.php?lang=1&amp;level=1&amp;sublinkid=4160&amp;lid=2807">click here</a> to access</div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>14.</strong> Trends in Maternal Mortality 2000 to 2017: Estimates by World Health Orgnization (WHO), United Nations Children&#39;s Fund (UNICEF), World Bank Group, United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) and the United Nations Population Division (released in September 2019), please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Maternal%20mortality%20Levels%20and%20trends%202000%20to%202017%20Executive%20Summary.pdf" title="Maternal mortality Levels and trends 2000 to 2017 Executive Summary" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Maternal%20mortality%20Levels%20and%20trends%202000%20to%202017%20Executive%20Summary.pdf" title="Maternal mortality Levels and trends 2000 to 2017 Executive Summary">click here</a> and <a href="https://www.unfpa.org/featured-publication/trends-maternal-mortality-2000-2017" title="https://www.unfpa.org/featured-publication/trends-maternal-mortality-2000-2017">click here</a> to access</div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>13</strong>. National Health Profile 2018, 13th Issue, Central Bureau of Health Intelligence, Ministry of Health &amp; Family Welfare, please <a href="https://im4change.org/docs/900National%20Health%20Profile%202018%2013th%20Issue%20Central%20Bureau%20of%20Health%20Intelligence%20Ministry%20of%20Health%20&amp;%20Family%20Welfare.pdf" title="https://im4change.org/docs/900National%20Health%20Profile%202018%2013th%20Issue%20Central%20Bureau%20of%20Health%20Intelligence%20Ministry%20of%20Health%20&amp;%20Family%20Welfare.pdf">click here</a> to access&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>12. </strong>India: Health of the Nation&rsquo;s States - The India State-Level Disease Burden Initiative, Disease Burden Trends in the States of India 1990 to 2016 (released in October, 2017), prepared by Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), Public Health Foundation of India (PHFI), Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) and Ministry of Health &amp; Family Welfare (MoHFW), please <a href="https://im4change.org/docs/11592India_Health_of.pdf" title="https://im4change.org/docs/11592India_Health_of.pdf">click here</a> to access</div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>11</strong>. National Health Accounts: Estimates for India 2014-15 (released in October, 2017), prepared by the National Health Accounts Technical Secretariat, National Health Systems Resource Centre and Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/National%20Health%20Accounts%20Estimates%20Report%202014-15.pdf" title="National Health Accounts Estimates for India 2014-15" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/National%20Health%20Accounts%20Estimates%20Report%202014-15.pdf" title="National Health Accounts Estimates for India 2014-15">click here</a> to access</div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>10</strong>. National Health Profile 2015, Central Bureau of Health Intelligence, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (please <a href="http://www.cbhidghs.nic.in/E-Book%20HTML-2015/index.html" title="http://www.cbhidghs.nic.in/E-Book%20HTML-2015/index.html">click here</a> to access)</div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>9</strong>. 71st round NSS report: Key Indicators of Social Consumption in India-Health (published in June 2015), please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/nss_71st_ki_health_30june15.pdf" title="NSS 71st Round Health" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/nss_71st_ki_health_30june15.pdf" title="NSS 71st Round Health">click here</a> to access the full report; please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/NSS%20Press%20Release%20Health.pdf" title="NSS Press Note Health" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/NSS%20Press%20Release%20Health.pdf" title="NSS Press Note Health">click here</a> to read the summary of findings</div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>8</strong>. Draft National Health Policy 2015 (published in December 2014), Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (Please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Draft%20National%20Health%20Policy%202015.pdf" title="Draft NHP 2015" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Draft%20National%20Health%20Policy%202015.pdf" title="Draft NHP 2015">click here</a> to download)</div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>7</strong>. United Nations&#39; report (released in May, 2014) entitled Trends in maternal mortality estimates 1990 to 2013,&nbsp;</span>(please&nbsp;<a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Trends%20in%20Maternal%20Mortality%201990%20to%202013.pdf" title="Trends in Maternal Mortality 1990 to 2013" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Trends%20in%20Maternal%20Mortality%201990%20to%202013.pdf" title="Trends in Maternal Mortality 1990 to 2013">click here</a>&nbsp;to download)</div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><strong>6. </strong><a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/APR_Progress_Report_2013_9_Sept_2013_1.pdf" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/APR_Progress_Report_2013_9_Sept_2013_1.pdf">Committing to Child Survival</a>: A Promise Renewed Progress Report 2013, UNICEF </span></span></p></div><p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>5</strong>. Pneumonia Progress Report, 2012, released by IVAC and John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012.pdf" title="Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012.pdf" title="Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012">click here</a> to access</span></p><p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p><div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>4</strong>. Defeating malaria in Asia, the Pacific, Americas, Middle East and Europe (2012), World Health Organization and PATH,&nbsp;</span></div><p style="text-align:justify"><a href="http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Defeating%20malaria.pdf" title="http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Defeating%20malaria.pdf">http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Defeat<br />ing%20malaria.pdf</a></p><p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>3</strong>. WHO Global Report: Mortality Attributable to Tobacco (2012), please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/WHO%20report%20on%20Tobacco.pdf" title="WHO " title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/WHO%20report%20on%20Tobacco.pdf" title="WHO ">click here</a> to access&nbsp;&nbsp;</span></p><p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>2</strong>. The Growing Danger of Non-Communicable Diseases: Acting Now to Reverse Course, September, 2011, The World Bank, please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/WBDeepeningCrisis.pdf" title="WBDeepeningCrisis" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/WBDeepeningCrisis.pdf" title="WBDeepeningCrisis">click here</a> to access</span></p><p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>1</strong>. National Family Health Survey III (2005-06), please <a href="http://rchiips.org/NFHS/nfhs3.shtml" title="http://rchiips.org/NFHS/nfhs3.shtml">click here</a> to access &nbsp;</span></p><p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:justify">' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>hunger-hdi/public-health-51.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>Hunger / HDI | Public Health | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content="KEY TRENDS • The 2019 India TB report says that the country accounted for a quarter of the global tuberculosis (TB) burden with an estimated 27 lakh cases in 2018. In 2018, the country was able to achieve a total notification of 21.5 lakh TB cases, of which..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Public Health</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">KEY TRENDS </span></p><p style="text-align:justify"> </p><div style="text-align:justify">• The 2019 India TB report says that the country accounted for a quarter of the global tuberculosis (TB) burden with an estimated 27 lakh cases in 2018. In 2018, the country was able to achieve a total notification of 21.5 lakh TB cases, of which 25 percent was from private sector. Majority of the TB burden is among the working age group. Nearly 89 percent of TB cases came from the age group 15-69 years. About 2/3rd of the TB patients were males <strong>*15</strong></div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><div style="text-align:justify">• Maternal Mortality Ratio for India was 370 in 2000, 286 in 2005, 210 in 2010, 158 in 2015 and 145 in 2017. Therefore, the MMRatio for the country reduced by almost 61 percent between 2000 and 2017. MMRatio for China was 59 in 2000, 44 in 2005, 36 in 2010, 30 in 2015 and 29 in 2017. Therefore, the MMRatio for China fell by around 51 percent between 2000 and 2017 <strong>*14</strong> <br /> </div><div style="text-align:justify">• The per capita public expenditure (actual) on health in nominal terms has gone up from Rs. 621 in 2009-10 to Rs. 1,112 in 2015-16. Public expenditure on health (includes health sector expenditure by Centre and States/UTs) as a percentage of GDP was 1.02 percent in 2015-16. There is no significant change in public expenditure on health as a percentage of GDP since 2009-10. The Centre-State share in total public expenditure on health was 31:69 in 2015-16, which used to be 36:64 in 2009-10 <strong>*13</strong><br /><br />• The North-Eastern states had the highest (viz. Rs. 2,878 per capita) and Empowered Action Group (EAG) states (including Assam) had the lowest (viz. Rs. 871 per capita) average per capita public expenditure on health in 2015-16 (excluding UTs). The North-Eastern states had the highest public health expenditure as a percentage of Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP) in 2015-16 (2.76 percent). Public health expenditure as a percentage of GSDP stood at 1.36 percent for EAG states (including Assam) and 0.76 percent for major non-EAG states <strong>*13</strong></div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><div style="text-align:justify">• Of the total disease burden in India in 1990, a tenth was caused by a group of risks including unhealthy diet, high blood pressure, high blood sugar, high cholesterol, and overweight, which mainly contribute to ischaemic heart disease, stroke, and diabetes. The contribution of this group of risks increased massively to a quarter of the total disease burden in India in 2016 <strong>*12</strong><br /><br />• The Out-of-Pocket Expenditure (OOPE) on health by households is Rs. 3,02,425 crores (62.6 percent of total health expenditure, 2.4 percent of GDP, Rs. 2,394 per capita) for the year 2014-15. Private Health Insurance expenditure is Rs. 17,755 crores (3.7 percent of total health expenditure) for the year 2014-15 <strong>*11</strong><br /><br />• Based on available evidence, cardiovascular disease (24 percent), chronic respiratory disease (11 percent), cancer (6 percent) and diabetes (2 percent) are the leading cause of mortality in India <strong>*10</strong><br /> </div><div style="text-align:justify">• The total number of dengue cases in India has grown from 28,292 in 2010 to 40,425 in 2014. The total number of dengue related deaths stood at 131 in 2014 <strong>*10</strong></div><div style="text-align:justify"><br />• The Proportion (per 1000) of Ailing Persons (PAP), measured as the number of living persons reporting ailments (per 1000 persons), was 89 persons in rural India and 118 persons in urban India <strong>*9</strong><br /> </div><div style="text-align:justify">• Private doctors were the most important single source of non-hospitalized treatment in both the sectors (Rural & Urban). More than 70% (72 per cent in the rural areas and 79 per cent in the urban areas) spells of ailment were treated in the private sector (consisting of private doctors, nursing homes, private hospitals, charitable institutions, etc.) <strong>*9</strong></div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><div style="text-align:justify">• It is observed that in rural India, 42 percent hospitalised treatment was carried out in public hospital and rest 58 percent in private hospital. For the urban India, the corresponding figures were 32 percent and 68 percent. It may be noted in this context that households (or persons within households) were segregated in sector (rural/urban) by their place of domicile, and not by the place of treatment <strong>*9</strong></div><p style="text-align:justify"> </p><div style="text-align:justify">• Average medical expenditure per hospitalisation case: Higher amount was spent for treatment per hospitalised case by people in the private hospitals (Rs. 25850) than in the public hospitals (Rs. 6120). The highest expenditure was recorded for treatment of Cancer (Rs. 56712) followed by that for Cardio-vascular diseases (Rs. 31647). Average medical expenditure per non-hospitalisation case was Rs. 509 in rural India and Rs. 639 in urban India <strong>*9</strong><br /><br />• As much as 86 percent of rural population and 82 percent of urban population were still not covered under any scheme of health expenditure support. Government, however, was able to bring about 12 percent urban and 13 percent rural population under health protection coverage through Rastriya Swasthya Bima Yojana (RSBY) or similar plan. Only 12 percent households of the 5th quintile class (Usual Monthly Per Capita Consumer Expenditure) of urban area had some arrangement of medical insurance from private provider <strong>*9</strong></div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><div style="text-align:justify">• The draft National Health Policy 2015 proposes a potentially achievable target of raising public health expenditure to 2.5% of the GDP. It also notes that 40% of this would need to come from Central expenditures. At current prices, a target of 2.5% of GDP translates to Rs. 3800 per capita, representing an almost four fold increase in five years <strong>*8</strong><br /> <br />• Maternal mortality ratio (MMR)* in India stood at 560 maternal deaths (per 100000 live births) during 1990, 460 during 1995, 370 during 2000, 280 during 2005 and 190 during 2013. India could reduce MMR by 65 percent between 1990 and 2013<strong> *7</strong><br /><br />• At the country level, the two countries that accounted for one third of all global maternal deaths are India at 17 percent (50000) and Nigeria at 14 percent (40000)<strong> *7</strong><br /><br />• U5MR in India declined by 55 percent from 126 in 1990 to 56 in 2012. Infant Mortality Rate declined from 88 in 1990 to 44 in 2012. Neonatal mortality rate declined from 51 in 1990 to 31 in 2012. U5MR in India among boys declined from 121 in 1990 to 54 in 2012. U5MR in India among girls declined from 130 in 1990 to 59 in 2012. The share of neonatal deaths in under-five deaths stood at 55 percent in 2012 as compared to 41 percent in 1990 <strong>*6</strong><br /><br />• Pneumonia is the leading cause of child mortality in India, responsible for the deaths of nearly 400,000 children under five in 2010 <strong>*5</strong><br /><br />• The Indian Commission on Macroeconomics and Health notes that, in India, 13 household person-days per patient were lost per episode of malaria. Furthermore, the commission estimated that the overall monetary losses to families (income losses together with treatment expenses) could amount to between 200 and 400 Indian rupees (US$ 3.5 to 7) <strong>*4</strong><br /><br />• Odisha is one of the most highly malaria-endemic states in India, accounting for 24% of reported cases in 2010 despite consisting of less of than 4% of the national population. Malaria is particularly common among tribal groups which represent 44% of the population of Orissa <strong>*4</strong><br /><br />• Globally 12% of all deaths among adults aged 30 years and over were attributed to tobacco as compared with 16% in India, 17% in Pakistan and 31% in Bangladesh <strong>*3</strong><br /><br />• A recent study illustrated the economic impact of Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs) in India by estimating that if NCDs like: heart disease, cancer, diabetes, chronic respiratory conditions, and other NCDs were “eliminated”, the country’s 2004 GDP would have been 4 to 10 percent greater<strong> *2</strong><br /><br />• The share of out-of-pocket household health expenditures on NCDs in India increased from 32 percent to 47 percent between 1995–1996 and 2004. Moreover, 40 percent of these expenditures were financed by borrowing and sales of assets, increasing the household’s financial vulnerability<strong> *2</strong><br /><br />• In NFHS-III, 62% of women with two daughters and no sons say they want no more children, compared with 47% in NFHS-II<strong> *1</strong></div><div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>15.</strong> 2019 India TB report, released in 2019, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, please <a href="https://tbcindia.gov.in/WriteReadData/India%20TB%20Report%202019.pdf" title="https://tbcindia.gov.in/WriteReadData/India%20TB%20Report%202019.pdf">click here</a> and <a href="https://tbcindia.gov.in/index1.php?lang=1&level=1&sublinkid=4160&lid=2807" title="https://tbcindia.gov.in/index1.php?lang=1&level=1&sublinkid=4160&lid=2807">click here</a> to access</div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>14.</strong> Trends in Maternal Mortality 2000 to 2017: Estimates by World Health Orgnization (WHO), United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF), World Bank Group, United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) and the United Nations Population Division (released in September 2019), please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Maternal%20mortality%20Levels%20and%20trends%202000%20to%202017%20Executive%20Summary.pdf" title="Maternal mortality Levels and trends 2000 to 2017 Executive Summary" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Maternal%20mortality%20Levels%20and%20trends%202000%20to%202017%20Executive%20Summary.pdf" title="Maternal mortality Levels and trends 2000 to 2017 Executive Summary">click here</a> and <a href="https://www.unfpa.org/featured-publication/trends-maternal-mortality-2000-2017" title="https://www.unfpa.org/featured-publication/trends-maternal-mortality-2000-2017">click here</a> to access</div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>13</strong>. National Health Profile 2018, 13th Issue, Central Bureau of Health Intelligence, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, please <a href="https://im4change.org/docs/900National%20Health%20Profile%202018%2013th%20Issue%20Central%20Bureau%20of%20Health%20Intelligence%20Ministry%20of%20Health%20&%20Family%20Welfare.pdf" title="https://im4change.org/docs/900National%20Health%20Profile%202018%2013th%20Issue%20Central%20Bureau%20of%20Health%20Intelligence%20Ministry%20of%20Health%20&%20Family%20Welfare.pdf">click here</a> to access </div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>12. </strong>India: Health of the Nation’s States - The India State-Level Disease Burden Initiative, Disease Burden Trends in the States of India 1990 to 2016 (released in October, 2017), prepared by Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), Public Health Foundation of India (PHFI), Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) and Ministry of Health & Family Welfare (MoHFW), please <a href="https://im4change.org/docs/11592India_Health_of.pdf" title="https://im4change.org/docs/11592India_Health_of.pdf">click here</a> to access</div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>11</strong>. National Health Accounts: Estimates for India 2014-15 (released in October, 2017), prepared by the National Health Accounts Technical Secretariat, National Health Systems Resource Centre and Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/National%20Health%20Accounts%20Estimates%20Report%202014-15.pdf" title="National Health Accounts Estimates for India 2014-15" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/National%20Health%20Accounts%20Estimates%20Report%202014-15.pdf" title="National Health Accounts Estimates for India 2014-15">click here</a> to access</div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>10</strong>. National Health Profile 2015, Central Bureau of Health Intelligence, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (please <a href="http://www.cbhidghs.nic.in/E-Book%20HTML-2015/index.html" title="http://www.cbhidghs.nic.in/E-Book%20HTML-2015/index.html">click here</a> to access)</div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>9</strong>. 71st round NSS report: Key Indicators of Social Consumption in India-Health (published in June 2015), please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/nss_71st_ki_health_30june15.pdf" title="NSS 71st Round Health" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/nss_71st_ki_health_30june15.pdf" title="NSS 71st Round Health">click here</a> to access the full report; please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/NSS%20Press%20Release%20Health.pdf" title="NSS Press Note Health" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/NSS%20Press%20Release%20Health.pdf" title="NSS Press Note Health">click here</a> to read the summary of findings</div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>8</strong>. Draft National Health Policy 2015 (published in December 2014), Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (Please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Draft%20National%20Health%20Policy%202015.pdf" title="Draft NHP 2015" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Draft%20National%20Health%20Policy%202015.pdf" title="Draft NHP 2015">click here</a> to download)</div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>7</strong>. United Nations' report (released in May, 2014) entitled Trends in maternal mortality estimates 1990 to 2013, </span>(please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Trends%20in%20Maternal%20Mortality%201990%20to%202013.pdf" title="Trends in Maternal Mortality 1990 to 2013" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Trends%20in%20Maternal%20Mortality%201990%20to%202013.pdf" title="Trends in Maternal Mortality 1990 to 2013">click here</a> to download)</div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><strong>6. </strong><a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/APR_Progress_Report_2013_9_Sept_2013_1.pdf" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/APR_Progress_Report_2013_9_Sept_2013_1.pdf">Committing to Child Survival</a>: A Promise Renewed Progress Report 2013, UNICEF </span></span></p></div><p style="text-align:justify"> </p><p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>5</strong>. Pneumonia Progress Report, 2012, released by IVAC and John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012.pdf" title="Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012.pdf" title="Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012">click here</a> to access</span></p><p style="text-align:justify"> </p><div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>4</strong>. Defeating malaria in Asia, the Pacific, Americas, Middle East and Europe (2012), World Health Organization and PATH, </span></div><p style="text-align:justify"><a href="http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Defeating%20malaria.pdf" title="http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Defeating%20malaria.pdf">http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Defeat<br />ing%20malaria.pdf</a></p><p style="text-align:justify"> </p><p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>3</strong>. WHO Global Report: Mortality Attributable to Tobacco (2012), please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/WHO%20report%20on%20Tobacco.pdf" title="WHO " title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/WHO%20report%20on%20Tobacco.pdf" title="WHO ">click here</a> to access </span></p><p style="text-align:justify"> </p><p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>2</strong>. The Growing Danger of Non-Communicable Diseases: Acting Now to Reverse Course, September, 2011, The World Bank, please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/WBDeepeningCrisis.pdf" title="WBDeepeningCrisis" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/WBDeepeningCrisis.pdf" title="WBDeepeningCrisis">click here</a> to access</span></p><p style="text-align:justify"> </p><p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>1</strong>. National Family Health Survey III (2005-06), please <a href="http://rchiips.org/NFHS/nfhs3.shtml" title="http://rchiips.org/NFHS/nfhs3.shtml">click here</a> to access </span></p><p style="text-align:justify"> </p><p style="text-align:justify"> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681e4619ea796-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681e4619ea796-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr681e4619ea796-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681e4619ea796-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681e4619ea796-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681e4619ea796-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681e4619ea796-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr681e4619ea796-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr681e4619ea796-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 21, 'title' => 'Public Health', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">KEY TRENDS&nbsp;</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <div style="text-align:justify">&bull; The 2019&nbsp;India&nbsp;TB&nbsp;report&nbsp;says&nbsp;that the&nbsp;country&nbsp;accounted for a quarter of the global tuberculosis (TB) burden with an estimated 27 lakh cases in 2018. In 2018, the country was able to achieve a total notification of 21.5 lakh TB cases, of which 25 percent was from private sector. Majority of the TB burden is among the working age group. Nearly 89 percent of TB cases came from the age group 15-69 years. About 2/3rd of the TB patients were males <strong>*15</strong></div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&bull; Maternal Mortality Ratio for India was 370 in 2000, 286 in 2005, 210 in&nbsp; 2010, 158 in 2015 and 145 in 2017. Therefore, the MMRatio for the country reduced by almost 61 percent between 2000 and 2017. MMRatio for China was 59 in 2000, 44 in 2005, 36 in 2010, 30 in 2015 and 29 in 2017. Therefore, the MMRatio for China fell by around 51 percent between 2000 and 2017 <strong>*14</strong> &nbsp;<br /> &nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&bull; The per capita public expenditure (actual) on health in nominal terms has gone up from Rs. 621 in 2009-10 to Rs. 1,112 in 2015-16. Public expenditure on health (includes health sector expenditure by Centre and States/UTs) as a percentage of GDP was 1.02 percent in 2015-16. There is no significant change in public expenditure on health as a percentage of GDP since 2009-10. The Centre-State share in total public expenditure on health was 31:69 in 2015-16, which used to be 36:64 in 2009-10 <strong>*13</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; The North-Eastern states had the highest (viz. Rs. 2,878 per capita) and Empowered Action Group (EAG) states (including Assam) had the lowest (viz. Rs. 871 per capita) average per capita public expenditure on health in 2015-16 (excluding UTs). The North-Eastern states had the highest public health expenditure as a percentage of Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP) in 2015-16 (2.76 percent). Public health expenditure as a percentage of GSDP stood at 1.36 percent for EAG states (including Assam) and 0.76 percent for major non-EAG states <strong>*13</strong></div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&bull; Of the total disease burden in India in 1990, a tenth was caused by a group of risks including unhealthy diet, high blood pressure, high blood sugar, high cholesterol, and overweight, which mainly contribute to ischaemic heart disease, stroke, and diabetes. The contribution of this group of risks increased massively to a quarter of the total disease burden in India in 2016 <strong>*12</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; The Out-of-Pocket Expenditure (OOPE) on health by households is Rs. 3,02,425 crores (62.6 percent of total health expenditure, 2.4 percent of GDP, Rs. 2,394 per capita) for the year 2014-15. Private Health Insurance expenditure is Rs. 17,755 crores (3.7 percent of total health expenditure) for the year 2014-15 <strong>*11</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; Based on available evidence, cardiovascular disease (24 percent), chronic respiratory disease (11 percent), cancer (6 percent) and diabetes (2 percent) are the leading cause of mortality in India <strong>*10</strong><br /> &nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&bull; The total number of dengue cases in India has grown from 28,292 in 2010 to 40,425 in 2014. The total number of dengue related deaths stood at 131 in 2014 <strong>*10</strong></div> <div style="text-align:justify"><br /> &bull; The Proportion (per 1000) of Ailing Persons (PAP), measured as the number of living persons reporting ailments (per 1000 persons), was 89 persons in rural India and 118 persons in urban India <strong>*9</strong><br /> &nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&bull; Private doctors were the most important single source of non-hospitalized treatment in both the sectors (Rural &amp; Urban). More than 70% (72 per cent in the rural areas and 79 per cent in the urban areas) spells of ailment were treated in the private sector (consisting of private doctors, nursing homes, private hospitals, charitable institutions, etc.) <strong>*9</strong></div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&bull; It is observed that in rural India, 42 percent hospitalised treatment was carried out in public hospital and rest 58 percent in private hospital. For the urban India, the corresponding figures were 32 percent and 68 percent. It may be noted in this context that households (or persons within households) were segregated in sector (rural/urban) by their place of domicile, and not by the place of treatment <strong>*9</strong></div> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <div style="text-align:justify">&bull; Average medical expenditure per hospitalisation case: Higher amount was spent for treatment per hospitalised case by people in the private hospitals (Rs. 25850) than in the public hospitals (Rs. 6120). The highest expenditure was recorded for treatment of Cancer (Rs. 56712) followed by that for Cardio-vascular diseases (Rs. 31647). Average medical expenditure per non-hospitalisation case was Rs. 509 in rural India and Rs. 639 in urban India <strong>*9</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; As much as 86 percent of rural population and 82 percent of urban population were still not covered under any scheme of health expenditure support. Government, however, was able to bring about 12 percent urban and 13 percent rural population under health protection coverage through Rastriya Swasthya Bima Yojana (RSBY) or similar plan. Only 12 percent households of the 5th quintile class (Usual Monthly Per Capita Consumer Expenditure) of urban area had some arrangement of medical insurance from private provider <strong>*9</strong></div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&bull; The draft National Health Policy 2015 proposes a potentially achievable target of raising public health expenditure to 2.5% of the GDP. It also notes that 40% of this would need to come from Central expenditures. At current prices, a target of 2.5% of GDP translates to Rs. 3800 per capita, representing an almost four fold increase in five years <strong>*8</strong><br /> &nbsp;<br /> &bull; Maternal mortality ratio (MMR)* in India stood at 560 maternal deaths (per 100000 live births) during 1990, 460 during 1995, 370 during 2000, 280 during 2005 and 190 during 2013. India could reduce MMR by 65 percent between 1990 and 2013<strong> *7</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; At the country level, the two countries that accounted for one third of all global maternal deaths are India at 17 percent (50000) and Nigeria at 14 percent (40000)<strong> *7</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; U5MR in India declined by 55 percent from 126 in 1990 to 56 in 2012. Infant Mortality Rate declined from 88 in 1990 to 44 in 2012. Neonatal mortality rate declined from 51 in 1990 to 31 in 2012. U5MR in India among boys declined from 121 in 1990 to 54 in 2012. U5MR in India among girls declined from 130 in 1990 to 59 in 2012. The share of neonatal deaths in under-five deaths stood at 55 percent in 2012 as compared to 41 percent in 1990 <strong>*6</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; Pneumonia is the leading cause of child mortality in India, responsible for the deaths of nearly 400,000 children under five in 2010 <strong>*5</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; The Indian Commission on Macroeconomics and Health notes that, in India, 13 household person-days per patient were lost per episode of malaria. Furthermore, the commission estimated that the overall monetary losses to families (income losses together with treatment expenses) could amount to between 200 and 400 Indian rupees (US$ 3.5 to 7) <strong>*4</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; Odisha is one of the most highly malaria-endemic states in India, accounting for 24% of reported cases in 2010 despite consisting of less of than 4% of the national population. Malaria is particularly common among tribal groups which represent 44% of the population of Orissa <strong>*4</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; Globally 12% of all deaths among adults aged 30 years and over were attributed to tobacco as compared with 16% in India, 17% in Pakistan and 31% in Bangladesh <strong>*3</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; A recent study illustrated the economic impact of Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs) in India by estimating that if NCDs like: heart disease, cancer, diabetes, chronic respiratory conditions, and other NCDs were &ldquo;eliminated&rdquo;, the country&rsquo;s 2004 GDP would have been 4 to 10 percent greater<strong> *2</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; The share of out-of-pocket household health expenditures on NCDs in India increased from 32 percent to 47 percent between 1995&ndash;1996 and 2004. Moreover, 40 percent of these expenditures were financed by borrowing and sales of assets, increasing the household&rsquo;s financial vulnerability<strong> *2</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; In NFHS-III, 62% of women with two daughters and no sons say they want no more children, compared with 47% in NFHS-II<strong> *1</strong></div> <div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify"><strong>15.</strong> 2019 India TB report, released in 2019, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, please <a href="https://tbcindia.gov.in/WriteReadData/India%20TB%20Report%202019.pdf">click here</a> and <a href="https://tbcindia.gov.in/index1.php?lang=1&amp;level=1&amp;sublinkid=4160&amp;lid=2807">click here</a> to access</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify"><strong>14.</strong> Trends in Maternal Mortality 2000 to 2017: Estimates by World Health Orgnization (WHO), United Nations Children&#39;s Fund (UNICEF), World Bank Group, United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) and the United Nations Population Division (released in September 2019), please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Maternal%20mortality%20Levels%20and%20trends%202000%20to%202017%20Executive%20Summary.pdf" title="Maternal mortality Levels and trends 2000 to 2017 Executive Summary">click here</a> and <a href="https://www.unfpa.org/featured-publication/trends-maternal-mortality-2000-2017">click here</a> to access</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify"><strong>13</strong>. National Health Profile 2018, 13th Issue, Central Bureau of Health Intelligence, Ministry of Health &amp; Family Welfare, please <a href="https://im4change.org/docs/900National%20Health%20Profile%202018%2013th%20Issue%20Central%20Bureau%20of%20Health%20Intelligence%20Ministry%20of%20Health%20&amp;%20Family%20Welfare.pdf">click here</a> to access&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify"><strong>12. </strong>India: Health of the Nation&rsquo;s States - The India State-Level Disease Burden Initiative, Disease Burden Trends in the States of India 1990 to 2016 (released in October, 2017), prepared by Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), Public Health Foundation of India (PHFI), Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) and Ministry of Health &amp; Family Welfare (MoHFW), please <a href="https://im4change.org/docs/11592India_Health_of.pdf">click here</a> to access</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify"><strong>11</strong>. National Health Accounts: Estimates for India 2014-15 (released in October, 2017), prepared by the National Health Accounts Technical Secretariat, National Health Systems Resource Centre and Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/National%20Health%20Accounts%20Estimates%20Report%202014-15.pdf" title="National Health Accounts Estimates for India 2014-15">click here</a> to access</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify"><strong>10</strong>. National Health Profile 2015, Central Bureau of Health Intelligence, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (please <a href="http://www.cbhidghs.nic.in/E-Book%20HTML-2015/index.html">click here</a> to access)</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify"><strong>9</strong>. 71st round NSS report: Key Indicators of Social Consumption in India-Health (published in June 2015), please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/nss_71st_ki_health_30june15.pdf" title="NSS 71st Round Health">click here</a> to access the full report; please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/NSS%20Press%20Release%20Health.pdf" title="NSS Press Note Health">click here</a> to read the summary of findings</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify"><strong>8</strong>. Draft National Health Policy 2015 (published in December 2014), Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (Please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Draft%20National%20Health%20Policy%202015.pdf" title="Draft NHP 2015">click here</a> to download)</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>7</strong>. United Nations&#39; report (released in May, 2014) entitled Trends in maternal mortality estimates 1990 to 2013,&nbsp;</span>(please&nbsp;<a href="tinymce/uploaded/Trends%20in%20Maternal%20Mortality%201990%20to%202013.pdf" title="Trends in Maternal Mortality 1990 to 2013">click here</a>&nbsp;to download)</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><strong>6. </strong><a href="tinymce/uploaded/APR_Progress_Report_2013_9_Sept_2013_1.pdf">Committing to Child Survival</a>: A Promise Renewed Progress Report 2013, UNICEF </span></span></p> </div> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>5</strong>. Pneumonia Progress Report, 2012, released by IVAC and John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012.pdf" title="Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012">click here</a> to access</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>4</strong>. Defeating malaria in Asia, the Pacific, Americas, Middle East and Europe (2012), World Health Organization and PATH,&nbsp;</span></div> <p style="text-align:justify"><a href="http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Defeating%20malaria.pdf">http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Defeating%20malaria.pdf</a></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>3</strong>. WHO Global Report: Mortality Attributable to Tobacco (2012), please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/WHO%20report%20on%20Tobacco.pdf" title="WHO ">click here</a> to access&nbsp;&nbsp;</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>2</strong>. The Growing Danger of Non-Communicable Diseases: Acting Now to Reverse Course, September, 2011, The World Bank, please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/WBDeepeningCrisis.pdf" title="WBDeepeningCrisis">click here</a> to access</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>1</strong>. National Family Health Survey III (2005-06), please <a href="http://rchiips.org/NFHS/nfhs3.shtml">click here</a> to access &nbsp;</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The key findings of the [inside]Global Tuberculosis Report 2022 (released in October 2022)[/inside] by World Health Organization are as follows (please click <a href="/upload/files/Global%20Tuberculosis%20Report%202022.pdf">here</a> and <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022">here</a> to access):&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>India-specific findings</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The case notifications of people newly diagnosed with TB in India were 16,67,136 in 2015, 17,63,876 in 2016, 16,49,694 in 2017, 19,08,683 in 2018, 21,62,323 in 2019, 16,29,301 in 2020, and 19,65,444 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/covid-19-and-tb">click here</a> to access the data. &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Between 2019 and 2020, India witnessed a reduction of 24.65 percent in case notifications of people newly diagnosed with TB. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/covid-19-and-tb ">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Between 2019 and 2021, India faced a reduction of 9.1 percent in case notifications of people newly diagnosed with TB. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/covid-19-and-tb ">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Almost all (90 percent) of the global drop in the number of people newly diagnosed with TB and reported (notified) between 2019 and 2020 was accounted for by 10 countries; the top three, India, Indonesia and the Philippines, accounted for 67 percent. In 2021, 90 percent of the reduction compared with 2019 was accounted for by only five countries. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/covid-19-and-tb ">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Among the 30 high TB burden and 3 global TB watchlist countries, the largest relative reductions in annual notifications between 2019 and 2020 were (ordered according to the size of the relative reduction) in Philippines, Lesotho, Indonesia, Zimbabwe, India, Myanmar and Bangladesh (all &gt;20 percent). In 2021, there was considerable recovery in India, Indonesia and the Philippines, although not to 2019 levels. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/covid-19-and-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2021, eight countries accounted for more than two thirds of global TB cases: India (28 percent), Indonesia (9.2 percent), China (7.4 percent), the Philippines (7.0 percent), Pakistan (5.8 percent), Nigeria (4.4 percent), Bangladesh (3.6 percent) and Democratic Republic of the Congo (2.9 percent). Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-1-tb-incidence">click here</a> to access data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Trends in the TB incidence rate in the 30 high TB burden countries are mixed. Between 2020 and 2021, there were estimated increases in countries with major shortfalls in TB notifications in 2020 and 2021 (e.g. India, Indonesia, Myanmar, Philippines), while in others the previous decline in the TB incidence rate has slowed or stabilized. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-1-tb-incidence">click here</a> to access data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; TB incidence rates for India were 341 per lakh population in 2000, 340 per lakh population in 2001, 339 per lakh population in 2002, 337 per lakh population in 2003, 334 per lakh population in 2004, 329 per lakh population in 2005, 323 per lakh population in 2006, 316 per lakh population in 2007, 309 per lakh population in 2008, 300 per lakh population in 2009, 292 per lakh population in 2010, 284 per lakh population in 2011, 277 per lakh population in 2012, 270 per lakh population in 2013, 263 per lakh population in 2014, 256 per lakh population in 2015, 249 per lakh population in 2016, 234 per lakh population in 2017, 224 per lakh population in 2018, 214 per lakh population in 2019, 204 per lakh population in 2020, and 210 per lakh population in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-1-tb-incidence">click here</a> to access data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; TB case notification rates (of new and relapse cases) for India were 105 per lakh population in 2000, 101 per lakh population in 2001, 97 per lakh population in 2002, 96 per lakh population in 2003, 100 per lakh population in 2004, 100 per lakh population in 2005, 105 per lakh population in 2006, 109 per lakh population in 2007, 110 per lakh population in 2008, 110 per lakh population in 2009, 108 per lakh population in 2010, 105 per lakh population in 2011, 101 per lakh population in 2012, 96 per lakh population in 2013, 123 per lakh population in 2014, 126 per lakh population in 2015, 132 per lakh population in 2016, 122 per lakh population in 2017, 139 per lakh population in 2018, 156 per lakh population in 2019, 117 per lakh population in 2020, and 140 per lakh population in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-1-tb-incidence">click here</a> to access data. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2021, 82 percent of global TB deaths among HIV-negative people occurred in the WHO African and South-East Asia regions; India alone accounted for 36 percent. The African and South-East Asia regions accounted for 82 percent of the combined total of TB deaths in HIV-negative and HIV-positive people; India accounted for 32 percent. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-2-tb-mortality">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Trends in the number of TB deaths in the 30 high TB burden countries are mixed. Between 2019 and 2021, striking increases are estimated to have occurred in countries with major shortfalls in TB notifications in 2020 and 2021 (e.g. India, Indonesia, Myanmar, Philippines), while in others previous declines have slowed or stabilized. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-2-tb-mortality">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The estimated absolute numbers of TB deaths (HIV-positive and HIV-negative) in India were 7,10,000 in 2000, 7,00,000 in 2001, 6,90,000 in 2002, 6,70,000 in 2003, 6,50,000 in 2004, 6,40,000 in 2005, 6,30,000 in 2006, 6,30,000 in 2007, 5,90,000 in 2008, 5,80,000 in 2009, 5,50,000 in 2010, 5,40,000 in 2011, 5,30,000 in 2012, 5,20,000 in 2013, 4,90,000 in 2014, 4,70,000 in 2015, 4,60,000 in 2016, 4,60,000 in 2017, 4,60,000 in 2018, 4,50,000 in 2019, 4,80,000 in 2020, and 5,10,000 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-2-tb-mortality">click here</a> to access the data.<br /> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<br /> &bull; The estimated numbers of incident cases of Multidrug- and rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/RR-TB) were 1,49,000 in 2015, 1,44,000 in 2016, 1,35,000 in 2017, 129,000 in 2018, 123,000 in 2019, 1,17,000 in 2020, and 1,19,000 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-3-drug-resistant-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The countries with the largest share of incident cases of MDR/RR-TB in 2021 were India (26 percent of global cases), the Russian Federation (8.5 percent of global cases) and Pakistan (7.9 percent of global cases). Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-3-drug-resistant-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2019&ndash;2021, the first-ever national survey was completed in India; this was one of the largest surveys to date, with a sample size of about 3,20,000 people. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2.4-tb-prevalence-surveys">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2020, the first full year of the COVID-19 pandemic, there were particularly large absolute and relative reductions in India, Indonesia and Philippines, followed by some recovery in 2021.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The number&nbsp;of notifications of people newly diagnosed with TB (new and relapse cases, all forms) was 11,15,718 in 2000, 10,85,075 in 2001, 10,60,951 in 2002, 10,73,282 in 2003, 11,36,182 in 2004, 11,56,248 in 2005, 12,28,827 in 2006, 12,95,943 in 2007, 13,32,267 in 2008, 13,51,913 in 2009, 13,39,866 in 2010, 13,23,949 in 2011, 12,89,836 in 2012, 12,43,905 in 2013, 16,09,547 in 2014, 16,67,136 in 2015, 17,63,876 in 2016, 16,49,694 in 2017, 19,08,683 in 2018, 21,62,323 in 2019, 16,29,301 in 2020, and 19,65,444 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-1-case-notifications ">click here</a> to access the data. &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The number of estimated TB incident cases in India was 36,10,000 in 2000, 36,70,000 in 2001, 37,20,000 in 2002, 37,60,000 in 2003, 37,90,000 in 2004, 38,00,000 in 2005, 37,90,000 in 2006, 37,60,000 in 2007, 37,20,000 in 2008, 36,80,000 in 2009, 36,30,000 in 2010, 35,70,000 in 2011, 35,30,000 in 2012, 34,80,000 in 2013, 34,40,000 in 2014, 33,90,000 in 2015, 33,30,000 in 2016, 31,60,000 in 2017, 30,60,000 in 2018, 29,60,000 in 2019, 28,50,000 in 2020, and 29,50,000 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-1-case-notifications ">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The contribution of public-private mix (PPM) initiatives to total notifications was 2.3 percent in 2010, 0.26 percent in 2011, 0.24 percent in 2012, 6.0 percent in 2013, 12.0 percent in 2014, 11.0 percent in 2015, 17.0 percent in 2016, 23.0 percent in 2017, 26.0 percent in 2018, 28.0 percent in 2019, 31.0 percent in 2020, and 33.0 percent in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-1-case-notifications ">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The percentage of people in India newly diagnosed with pulmonary TB who were bacteriologically confirmed was 35 percent in 2000, 41 percent in 2001, 44 percent in 2002, 49 percent in 2003, 53 percent in 2004, 56 percent in 2005, 58 percent in 2006, 60 percent in 2007, 61 percent in 2008, 62 percent in 2009, 63 percent in 2010, 65 percent in 2011, 66 percent in 2012, 71 percent in 2013, 66 percent in 2014, 64 percent in 2015, 63 percent in 2016, 71 percent in 2017, 57 percent in 2018, 57 percent in 2019, 54 percent in 2020, and 66 percent in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-2-diagnostic-testing-for-tb--hiv-associated-tb-and-drug-resistant-tb">click here</a> to access the data</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The number of WHO-recommended rapid tests used per 1,00,000 population in the case of India was 258 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-2-diagnostic-testing-for-tb--hiv-associated-tb-and-drug-resistant-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The percentage of people in India initially tested for TB with a WHO-recommended rapid test who had a positive test was 24 percent in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-2-diagnostic-testing-for-tb--hiv-associated-tb-and-drug-resistant-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The number of WHO-recommended rapid diagnostic tests per person notified as a TB case (new and relapse cases, all forms) in India was 1.8 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-2-diagnostic-testing-for-tb--hiv-associated-tb-and-drug-resistant-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The estimated TB treatment coverage for India was 67 percent in 2021. The estimated TB treatment coverage among children aged 0&ndash;14 years for India was 32 percent in 2021. The estimated TB treatment coverage among children aged &gt;= 15 years for India was 71 percent in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-3-tb-treatment-and-treatment-coverage">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2021, ten countries accounted for 75 percent of the global gap between the estimated number of people who developed TB (incident TB cases) and the number of people who were detected with TB and officially reported. About 60 percent of the global gap was accounted for by five countries: India (24 percent), Indonesia (13 percent), the Philippines (10 percent), Pakistan (6.6 percent) and Nigeria (6.3 percent). Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-3-tb-treatment-and-treatment-coverage">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The estimated coverage of antiretroviral therapy for people living with HIV who developed TB for India 59 percent in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-3-tb-treatment-and-treatment-coverage">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The number of Indian people diagnosed with MDR/RR-TB was 3,288 in 2010, 4,297 in 2011, 17,253 in 2012, 18,888 in 2013, 25,748 in 2014, 28,876 in 2015, 37,258 in 2016, 39,009 in 2017, 58,347 in 2018, 66,255 in 2019, 49,679 in 2020, and 58,837 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-4-drug-resistant-tb-treatment">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The number of Indian people enrolled on MDR/RR-TB was 2,182 in 2010, 3,378 in 2011, 14,117 in 2012, 21,093 in 2013, 24,073 in 2014, 26,966 in 2015, 32,914 in 2016, 35,950 in 2017, 47,284 in 2018, 60,858 in 2019, 42,505 in 2020, and 53,037 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-4-drug-resistant-tb-treatment">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The number of Indian people enrolled on MDR/RR-TB was 2,182 in 2010, 3,378 in 2011, 14,117 in 2012, 21,093 in 2013, 24,073 in 2014, 26,966 in 2015, 32,914 in 2016, 35,950 in 2017, 47,284 in 2018, 60,858 in 2019, 42,505 in 2020, and 53,037 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-4-drug-resistant-tb-treatment">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The WHO regions with the best treatment coverage are the European Region and the Region of the Americas. Among the 30 high MDR/RR-TB burden countries, those with the best treatment coverage are 2021: Peru, the Russian Federation, Azerbaijan, the Republic of Moldova, India and Kazakhstan. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-4-drug-resistant-tb-treatment">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The estimated treatment coverage for MDR/RR-TB for India was 45 percent in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-4-drug-resistant-tb-treatment">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Seven countries (India, Nigeria, South Africa, Uganda, United Republic of Tanzania, Zambia and Zimbabwe) each reported initiating over 200 000 people with HIV on TB preventive treatment in 2021, accounting collectively for 82 percent of the 2.8 million reported globally. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-prevention">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Since 2014, spending on the diagnosis and treatment of drug-susceptible TB has fallen slightly. Spending on treatment of multidrug and rifampicin-resistant TB (MDR/RR-TB) has increased steadily since 2010: this growth is largely explained by trends in the BRICS group of countries (i.e., Brazil, Russian Federation, India, China and South Africa). Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/financing-for-tb">click here</a> to access the data. &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Bangladesh, Cambodia, China and Zambia are examples of high TB burden countries that have steadily increased domestic funding specifically allocated to NTPs (as opposed to funding allocated more generally for inpatient and outpatient care, including for people with TB) in recent years. There was a considerable reduction in domestic spending in India between 2020 and 2021; one explanation for this was less need for spending on second-line anti-TB drugs in 2021, given stocks that still existed from 2020. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/financing-for-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The international funding (at constant 2021 US$) for national TB programmes on TB prevention, diagnostic and treatment services was 37 million in 2010, 65 million in 2011, 61 million in 2012, 143 million in 2013, 92 million in 2014, 142 million in 2015, 135 million in 2016, 187 million in 2017, 170 million in 2018, 91 million in 2019, 85 million in 2020, and 154 million in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/financing-for-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The domestic funding (at constant 2021 US$) for national TB programmes on TB prevention, diagnostic and treatment services was 56 million in 2010, 60 million in 2011, 44 million in 2012, 85 million in 2013, 162 million in 2014, 132 million in 2015, 139 million in 2016, 305 million in 2017, 348 million in 2018, 365 million in 2019, 326 million in 2020, and 183 million in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/financing-for-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In the case of India, the sources of funding and funding gaps reported for the TB-specific budgets included in national strategic plans for TB were domestic funding: 66 percent, Global Fund: 29 percent, and international funding (excluding Global Fund): 4.9 percent in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/financing-for-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The distribution of the two UHC indicators in the 30 high TB burden countries and three global TB watchlist countries shows that, in general, values improve with income level; this is especially evident for the SCI. Nonetheless, the risk of catastrophic health expenditures is high (15 or above) in several middle-income countries, including Angola, Bangladesh, Cambodia, China, India, and Nigeria. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/uhc-tb-determinants/6.1-universal-health-coverage">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; To achieve Universal Health Coverage (UHC), substantial increases in investment in health are critical. From 2000 to 2019 there was a striking increase in health expenditure (from all sources) per capita in a few high TB burden countries, especially the upper-middle-income countries of Brazil, China, South Africa and Thailand. A steady upward trend was evident in Bangladesh, Ethiopia, India, Indonesia, Lesotho, Mongolia, Mozambique, the Philippines and Viet Nam, and there was a noticeable rise from 2012 to 2017 in Myanmar. Elsewhere, however, levels of spending have been relatively stable, and at generally much lower levels. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/uhc-tb-determinants/6.1-universal-health-coverage">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The current health expenditures per capita were US$ 86 in 2000, US$ 96 in 2001, US$ 99 in 2002, US$ 101 in 2003, US$ 109 in 2004, US$ 114 in 2005, US$ 119 in 2006, US$ 126 in 2007, US$ 131 in 2008, US$ 139 in 2009, US$ 141 in 2010, US$ 146 in 2011, US$ 162 in 2012, US$ 190 in 2013, US$ 189 in 2014, US$ 197 in 2015, US$ 205 in 2016, US$ 182 in 2017, US$ 196 in 2018, and US$ 211 in 2019.&nbsp;Kindly <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/uhc-tb-determinants/6.1-universal-health-coverage">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The estimated number of TB cases attributable to alcohol use disorders was 2,58,000, diabetes was 1,05,000, HIV was 93,000, smoking was 1,10,000 and undernourishment was 7,38,000 in 2021. Kindly <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/uhc-tb-determinants/6-3-tb-determinants">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Based on the latest available data in the World Bank database, some upper-middle-income and lower-middle-income countries (e.g. Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, Mongolia, South Africa, Thailand, and Viet Nam) appear to be performing relatively well. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/uhc-tb-determinants/6-3-tb-determinants">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Three new antigen-based skin tests for TB infection that perform better than tuberculin skin tests (particularly in terms of specificity) were evaluated and recommended by WHO in 2022; these are the Cy-Tb skin test, Serum Institute of India, India; C-TST, Anhui Zhifei Longcom Biopharmaceutical Co. Ltd, China; and Diaskintest, JSC Generium, Russian Federation. WHO plans to evaluate the following tests in the coming year: culture-free, targeted-sequencing solutions to test for drug resistance directly from sputum specimens; broth microdilution methods for drug-susceptibility testing (DST); and new IGRAs to test for TB infection. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-research-and-innovation">click here</a> to access the information.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In India, the Ministry of Health &amp; Family Welfare launched the 21-day TB Mukt Bharat Campaign at Ayushman Bharat Health and Wellness Centres (AB-HWCs), from 24 March to 14 April 2022. The campaign aimed to meaningfully engage community and civil society to build a people&rsquo;s movement to end TB. It was celebrated across 75 228 AB-HWCs; a total of 6 801 956 people were screened for TB, and 38 328 community awareness activities took place using 21 479 trained TB champions. Linked to this initiative, primary health care teams led by the newly introduced cadre of community health officers (CHOs) provide people-centred TB services to people&rsquo;s doorsteps. AB-HWCs are playing an important role in improving awareness, identifying TB symptoms at an early stage, offering treatment adherence and psychosocial support to individuals and families with TB, and creating a strong network of TB survivors to strengthen the TB response. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/featured-topics/civil-society-engagement">click here</a> to access the more information.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; WHO has been advancing MAF-TB efforts to strengthen the engagement of the private sector and other public care providers not linked to national TB programmes (NTPs) through a new initiative with the Bill &amp; Melinda Gates Foundation. The initiative promotes the development of enhanced PPM data dashboards in seven priority countries: Bangladesh, India, Indonesia, Kenya, Nigeria, Pakistan and the Philippines. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/featured-topics/maf-tb">click here</a> to get more information.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; India has developed a national multisectoral action framework for TB; this strategic document makes a strong case for transforming India&rsquo;s TB elimination efforts from a health sector struggle to a whole-of-society responsibility. The framework is a guide for policy-makers and a call to action for communities, civil society, the private sector, and other partners and stakeholders. The overarching goal is to strengthen the country&rsquo;s capacity for a multisectoral response that facilitates TB elimination by 2025, with the key objective being to achieve policy convergence and adopt a health-in-all approach. The framework highlights the six key strategic areas for integrated action: integrated health care service delivery; TB-free workplaces; socioeconomic support for patients; awareness generation and infection control; corporate social responsibility and investment in TB; and targeted intervention for key affected populations. It defines the list of government ministries and other stakeholders, and the strategic scope of collaboration with each of them. Also, the framework acknowledges the importance of resources for defined strategic areas (e.g. financing, capacity-building, technical resources and research), and calls on partners and governments to mobilize resources for its implementation. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/featured-topics/maf-tb">click here</a> to get more information.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The key findings of the report titled [inside]Rural Health Statistics 2020-21 (released in May 2022)[/inside], which has been prepared by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, are as follows (please <a href="/upload/files/Rural%20Health%20Statistics%202020-21.pdf">click here</a> to access):</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; As on 31st March, 2021, there were 1,56,101 and 1,718 Sub Centres (SCs), 25,140 and 5,439 Primary Health Centres (PHCs), and 5,481 and 470 Community Health Centres (CHCs), respectively, which were functioning in rural and urban areas of the country.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average rural population covered by a Sub Centre was 5,734 as on 1st July, 2021, whereas the norm is that one Sub Centre should be serving a population of size in the range 300-5,000.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average population in tribal/ hilly/ desert areas covered by a Sub Centre was 3,839 as on 1st July, 2021, whereas the norm is that one Sub Centre should be serving a population of size up to 3,000 in such areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; A Sub Centre is the most peripheral and first contact point between the primary health care system and the community. Sub Centres are assigned tasks relating to interpersonal communication in order to bring about behavioral change and provide services in relation to maternal and child health, family welfare, nutrition, immunisation, diarrhoea control and control of communicable diseases programmes. Each Sub Centre is required to be manned by at least one auxiliary nurse midwife (ANM) / female health worker and one male health worker. Under the National Rural Health Mission (NRHM), there is a provision for one additional second ANM on contract basis. One lady health visitor (LHV) is entrusted with the task of supervision of six Sub Centres. The Government of India bears the salary of ANM and LHV while the salary of the Male Health Worker is borne by the state governments.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average rural population covered by a Primary Health Centre (PHC) was 35,602 as on 1st July, 2021, whereas the norm is that one PHC should be serving a population of size in the range 20,000-30,000.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average population in tribal/ hilly/ desert areas covered by a PHC was 25,507 as on 1st July, 2021, whereas the norm is that one PHC should be serving a population of size up to 20,000 in such areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; PHC is the first contact point between the village community and the medical officer. The PHCs were envisaged to provide an integrated curative and preventive health care to the rural population with emphasis on preventive and promotive aspects of health care. The PHCs are established and maintained by the state governments under the Minimum Needs Programme (MNP)/ Basic Minimum Services (BMS) Programme. As per minimum requirement, a PHC is to be manned by a medical officer supported by 14 paramedical and other staff. Under NRHM, there is a provision for two additional staff nurses at PHCs on contract basis. It acts as a referral unit for 6 Sub Centres and has 4-6 beds for patients. The activities of PHC involve curative, preventive, promotive and family welfare services.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average rural population covered by a Community Health Centre (CHC) was 1,63,298 as on 1st July, 2021, whereas the norm is that one CHC should be serving a population of size in the range 80,000-1,20,000.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average population in tribal/ hilly/ desert areas covered by a CHC was 1,03,756 as on 1st July, 2021, whereas the norm is that one CHC should be serving a population of size up to 80,000 in such areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; CHCs are being established and maintained by the state government under Minimum Needs Program (MNP)/Basic Minimum Services (BMS) programme. As per minimum norms, a CHC is required to be manned by four medical specialists i.e. surgeon, physician, gynecologist and pediatrician supported by 21 paramedical and other staff. It has 30 indoor beds with one OT, X-ray, labour room and laboratory facilities. It serves as a referral centre for 4 PHCs and also provides facilities for obstetric care and specialist consultations.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Rural Health Care System in India</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Out of the sanctioned posts, a significant percentage of posts were vacant at all the levels. Nearly 21.1 percent of the sanctioned posts of Health Worker (Female)/ Auxiliary Nurse Midwife-ANM (at SCs and PHCs) were vacant as compared to 41.9 percent vacancies of Health Worker (Male) in 2021 at SCs. At PHCs, 64.2 percent of the sanctioned posts of Health Assistant (Male and Female) and 21.8 percent of the sanctioned posts of Doctors were vacant in 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The availability of manpower is one of the important prerequisites for the efficient functioning of the Rural Health services. As on 31st March, 2021, the overall shortfall (which excludes the existing surplus in some of the states) in the posts of Health Worker (Female) / ANM was 2.9 percent of the total requirement as per the norm of one HW(F)/ ANM per Sub Centre and PHC. The overall shortfall was mainly due to shortfall in states of Uttar Pradesh (1,871), Himachal Pradesh (1,253), Gujarat (616), Odisha (397), Tripura (380), and Uttarakhand (252).&nbsp;Similarly, in case of Health Worker (Male), there was a shortfall of 66.1 percent of the requirement. There was a vacancy of 21.1 percent for HW (Female)/ ANM (at SCs and PHCs) as compared to the sanctioned posts. There was a vacancy of 41.9 percent for Health Worker (Male) as compared to the sanctioned posts in 2021 at SCs. At PHCs, 64.2 percent of the sanctioned posts of Health Assistant (Male and Female) and 21.8 percent of the sanctioned posts of Doctors were vacant in 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; PHC is the first contact point between the village community and the Medical Officer. Manpower in PHC includes a Medical Officer supported by paramedical and other staff. In the case of PHC, for Health Assistant (male + female), the shortfall was 72.2 percent. For allopathic doctors at PHC, there was a shortfall of 4.3 percent of the total requirement at the national level. This happened due to a significant shortfall of doctors at PHCs in the states of Odisha (362), Karnataka (340), and Chhattisgarh (271).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The Community Health Centres provide specialised medical care of Surgeons, Obstetricians &amp; Gynecologists, Physicians and Pediatricians. The position of specialists manpower at CHCs as on 31st March, 2021 shows that out of the sanctioned posts, 72.3 percent of Surgeons, 64.2 percent of Obstetricians &amp; Gynecologists, 69.2 percent of physicians, and 67.1 percent of pediatricians were vacant. Overall 68 percent of the sanctioned posts of specialists at CHCs were vacant in rural areas. Moreover, as compared to requirements for existing infrastructure, there was a shortfall of 83.2 percent of Surgeons, 74.2 percent of Obstetricians &amp; Gynecologists, 82.2 percent of Physicians, and 80.6 percent of Pediatricians. Overall, there was a shortfall of 79.9 percent of specialists at the CHCs as compared to the requirement for existing CHCs. The shortfall of specialists was significantly high in most of the states. However, in addition to the specialists, about 17,012 General Duty Medical Officers (GDMOs) Allopathic and 514 AYUSH Specialists along with 2,955 GDMO AYUSH were also available at CHCs as on 31st March, 2021. In addition to this, there were 805 Anaesthetists and 289 Eye Surgeons available at CHCs as on 31st March, 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Comparison of the manpower position of major categories in 2021 with that in 2020 shows an overall increase in the number of ANMs at SCs &amp; PHCs and Doctors at PHCs during the period. However, there was a marginal decrease in the number of Specialists at CHCs. There was an increase of ANMs at SCs &amp; PHCs from 2,12,593 in 2020 to 2,14,820 in 2021 and Doctors at PHCs from 28,516 in 2020 to 31,716 in 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Considering the status of paramedical staff, there was an increase of Lab Technicians from 19,903 in 2020 to 22,723 in 2021 at PHCs and CHCs. There was an increase in the number of pharmacists from 25,792 in 2020 to 28,537 in 2021. A significant increase was also observed for nursing staff under PHC &amp; CHCs from 71,847 in 2020 to 79,044 in 2021. The number of radiographers decreased from 2,434 in 2020 to 2,418 in 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; A total of 1,224 Sub Divisional/ Sub District Hospitals were functioning as on 31st March, 2021 throughout the country. In these hospitals, 15,274 doctors were available. In addition to these doctors, nearly 42,073 paramedical staffs were also available at those hospitals as on 31st March, 2021. The number of doctors in Sub Divisional/ Sub District Hospitals increased from 13,399 in 2020 to 15,274 in 2021. The number of paramedical staff in Sub Divisional/ Sub District Hospitals also went up from 29,937 in 2020 to 42,073 in 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In addition to the above, 764 District Hospitals (DHs) were also functioning as on 31st March, 2021 throughout the country. There were 26,929 doctors available in the DHs. In addition to the doctors, roughly 90,435 paramedical staff were also available at District Hospitals as on 31st March, 2021. The number of doctors in District Hospitals went up from 22,827 in 2020 to 26,929 in 2021. The number of paramedical staff in District Hospitals increased from 80,920 in 2020 to 90,435 in 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The key findings of the report titled [inside]India TB Report 2022: Coming Together to End TB Altogether (released in March 2022)[/inside], which has been produced by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, are as follows (please <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/TB%20Annual%20Report%202022.pdf">click here</a> to access):&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; As per the Global TB Report 2021, the estimated incidence of all forms of TB in India for the year 2020 was 188 per 100,000 population (129-257 per 100,000 population).&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The total number of incident tuberculosis i.e., TB patients (new and relapse) notified during 2021 was 19,33,381 which was 19 percent higher than that of 2020 (16,28,161). The programme had been able to catch-up with the dip in TB notifications that was observed around the months when the two major covid waves happened in India.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The estimated incidence of all forms of TB in India as per Global TB report was 456 per lakh population in 2010, 437 per lakh population in 2011, 420 per lakh population in 2012, 404 per lakh population in 2013, 350 per lakh population in 2014, 328 per lakh population in 2015, 303 per lakh population in 2016, 286 per lakh population in 2017, 276 per lakh population in 2018, 266 per lakh population in 2019, and 257 per lakh population in 2020.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The estimated number of Multidrug-resistant (MDR) and Extensively drug-resistant (XDR) TB cases to have been put on treatment as per the global TB report 2021 was 4 per 100,000 and 1 per 100,000 population, respectively.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; During the pandemic, a significant reduction was observed in the total number of&nbsp;Drug-Resistant TB&nbsp;(DR-TB) patients started on treatment as compared to 2019. In 2020 and 2021, there was a reduction of 14 percent and 9 percent in the number MDR patients put on treatment as compared to the&nbsp;estimated numbers.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The estimated mortality rate among all forms of TB was 37 per 100,000 population (34-40 per 100,000 population) in 2020, as per the Global TB Report 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; There has been a slight increase in the mortality rate due to all forms of TB between 2019 and 2020 by 11 percent in the country.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In absolute numbers, the total number of estimated deaths from all forms of TB excluding HIV, for 2020 was 4.93 lakhs (4.53-5.36 lakhs) in the country, which was 13 percent higher that of the year 2019 estimate. &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; As per Nikshay, the total number of reported deaths among Drug sensitive (DS-TB) notified in 2020 was 76,002 (4.3 percent of the total notifications of 2020) which is 15.4 percent of the estimate for the country, thus emphasizing the importance of establishing a &ldquo;TB Death Surveillance and Response&rdquo; system in line with the maternal mortality surveillance to improve the coverage and real time resolution of lacunae including the system related factors.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; A recent systematic review (2020) estimating the direct&nbsp;and indirect patient costs of drug-sensitive and drug-resistant TB care in India reports that 7 to 32 percent of among DS-TB patients and 68 percent of DR-TB were experiencing catastrophic costs for TB care in India.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2021, among 21,35,830 patients diagnosed, 20,30,509 (95 percent) patients were put on treatment. 61 percent were male and 39 percent were female among the patients put on treatment.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Among the total notification, 6 percent patients were in paediatric age group. Among 17,51,437 TB patients notified in 2020, 83 percent were successfully treated while 4 percent died during treatment.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2021, 48,232 MDR/RR-TB patients were diagnosed and 43,380 (90 percent) were put on treatment. 8,455 Pre-XDR-TB, 376 XDR-TB and 13,724 H mono/poly patients were diagnosed and 7,562 (89 percent), 333 (89 percent) and 12,008 (87 percent) were put on treatment respectively.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; A total of 1939 patients were initiated on shorter oral Bdq-containing MDR/RR-TB regimen, 23,889 on longer M/XDR-TB regimen and 25,235 patients were initiated on shorter injection containing MDR-TB regimen.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The cohort of DR-TB patients initiated on treatment in 2019 reported 57 percent treatment success rate (34,535/60,873). This includes 39,358 of patients on shorter MDR-TB regimen (inj-containing) with 59 percent treatment success rate and 1,280 of patient on longer oral regimen with 70 percent treatment success rate. This cohort also includes 11,791 patients put on old conventional MDR-TB regimen that has reported 49 percent treatment success rate.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Available evidence and modelling studies indicate that nearly 20 percent of all TB cases in India may suffer from Diabetes Mellitus (DM).&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Under the&nbsp;National Tuberculosis Elimination Programme&nbsp;(NTEP), in 2021, out of the 74 percent of the known tobacco usage among all TB patients, 12 percent of TB patients were reported to be tobacco users. Among those screened, 30 percent were linked to tobacco cessation services.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Of all the notified TB patients, 95 percent know their HIV status. (Public: 96 percent, Private: 92 percent).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Nearly 95 percent of TB Detection Centres (TDCs) have co-located HIV testing facilities.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; More than 96 percent of&nbsp;People Living With HIV/AIDS&nbsp;(PLHIV) visiting the antiretroviral therapy (ART) centres every month are screened for existing TB symptoms.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; As per Nikshay data, the linkage of HIV-TB co-infected patients to Cotrimoxazole Preventive Therapy (CPT) and Antiretroviral Therapy in 2021 were 93 percent &amp; 95 percent, respectively.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Kindly click <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/JSA-Press-Statement-UB-2022-23-English-Final.pdf">here</a> and <a href="https://im4change.org/latest-news-updates/union-health-budget-2022-23-has-completely-overlooked-the-lessons-of-the-covid-19-epidemic-says-jan-swasthya-abhiyan.html">here</a> to access the [inside]Press release by Jan Swasthya Abhiyan dated February 2, 2022[/inside] on the Union Health Budget 2022-23.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">---</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The COVID-19 pandemic has devastated families and communities and disrupted societies and economies. Patients had to endure various indignities in both public and private hospitals without protections or recourse to adequate preventive and redressal mechanisms. While the COVID-19 vaccine is seen as a solution to the pandemic, its roll-out has also been rife with inequalities. However, many of the problems we have seen at this time stem from the deep-rooted problems in the public health system. A critical look at India&quot;s health system from the perspective of its patients is overdue.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Oxfam India undertook two rapid surveys on Patient&quot;s Rights Charter and COVID-19 vaccination through self-administered questionnaires, covering 28 states and 5 Union territories; as such, this bears the limitations arising from it being a self-selected sample. The former was done between February and April 2021 and received 3890 responses while the latter was done between August and September 2021 covering 10,955 respondents. Given the distinctive focus of each survey, both are presented separately.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The key findings of the survey on Patient&#39;s Rights done for Oxfam India report titled [inside]Securing Rights of Patients in India: Lessons from rapid surveys on peoples&rsquo; experiences of Patient&rsquo;s Rights Charter and the COVID-19 vaccination drive (released on 18 November, 2021)[/inside] are as follows (please <a href="/upload/files/Securing%20Rights%20of%20Patients%20in%20India%20by%20Oxfam%20India.pdf">click here</a> to access):&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; This captures some of the experience of patients with both the public and private healthcare system over the last decade with a focus on the provisions of the Patients &quot;Rights Charter.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Right to Confidentiality, Human Dignity and Privacy: Over a third of women (35 percent) said that they had to undergo a physical examination by a male practitioner without another female present in the room.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Right to Information: 74 percent of people said that the doctor simply wrote the prescription or treatment or asked them to get tests/ investigations done without explaining their disease, nature and/or cause of illness.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Right to Informed Consent: More than half of the respondents (57 percent) who were themselves/ their relatives had been hospitalised did not receive any information about investigations and tests being done.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Right to Second Opinion: At least a third of respondents who had themselves/ their relatives hospitalised said their doctor did not allow a second opinion.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Right to Non-Discrimination: A third of Muslim respondents and over 20 percent Dalit and Adivasi respondents reported feeling discriminated against on the grounds of their religion or caste in a hospital/ by a healthcare professional.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Right to Choose Source of Obtaining Medicine or Test: 8 in 10 respondents reported being asked to get tests/diagnostics from one place only.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Right to Transparency in Rates and Care According to Prescribed Rates: 58 percent of people of those who had themselves/ their relatives hospitalised, said that they were not provided with an estimated cost of treatment/procedure before the start of treatment/procedure. Three in every 10 people surveyed reported being denied case papers, patient records, investigation reports for treatment/ procedure by the hospital even after requesting the same.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Right to Take Discharge of Patient or Receive Body of Deceased from the Hospital: 19 percent of respondents whose close relatives were hospitalized said that they were denied the release of the dead body by the hospital</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em>The COVID-19 pandemic has deepened existing structural inequalities in the healthcare system. The report recommends:</em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The MoHFW should set up a mechanism to review the present status of adoption of the Patient&quot;s Rights Charter (PRC) in all states and UTs and order its immediate adoption. It should include the PRC in the Clinical Establishment Act (CEA) and issue a letter to the states and Union territories (UTs) for displaying PRC in all private and public hospitals in view of the unprecedented crisis induced by the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly for hospitals taking part in the Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (PMJAY).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The State and UT governments should issue orders to display the PRC in all private and public hospitals irrespective of adoption of CEA and ensure grievance redressal mechanisms for patients, through the appointment of an internal grievance officer within every public and private clinical establishment.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The National Medical Commission should introduce mandatory modules on patients &quot;rights in the healthcare curriculum.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em>Some of the key findings from the survey of the experiences of the vaccination drive were:</em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Eight out of 10 people said that they do not think that the government will be able to vaccinate all adults by December 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; 80 percent of people believed that it is more difficult for a daily wage worker to get the vaccine as compared to a salaried, middle-class person. Most did not think that the experience was equitable.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; With respect to how the government should address inequity in vaccination, some specific suggestions were:&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">- 83 percent believed that all vaccination should be done completely free of cost through the government, like previous vaccination drives.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">- Only 2 percent of respondents were in favour of a tax on essentials like fuel to fund the vaccination. 55 percent believed that imposing a one-time tax of 1 percent on the net-worth of India&quot;s richest 1000 families was the best mode of funding.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">- 89 percent of people said that the operational hours of vaccination centres should be expanded beyond 9 AM-5 PM.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">- 95 percent of people from all age categories felt that vaccination must be brought closer to the elderly, persons with disabilities and informal sector workers by making use of mobile vans, vaccination camps and home-based vaccination.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">- 88 percent believed that the government must ensure that marginalized groups such as street dwellers, migrant workers, immigrants, refugees and asylum seekers are given access to<br /> vaccination without having to furnish documentation.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">- Improve information about vaccination. 74 percent of respondents earned less than INR 10,000 per month and over 60 percent of respondents from marginalized and minority communities felt that the government has failed in informing them about how and when to get vaccinated. Eight in 10 felt that the government had been changing its COVID-19 vaccine policies too frequently.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">- 89 percent of people said that the government must do more to ramp vaccine production, especially through public sector companies.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">- The experiences of vaccination show the</p> <p style="text-align:justify">-- Challenges with vaccination:</p> <p style="text-align:justify">---29 percent said that they either had to make multiple visits to the vaccination centre or stand in long queues.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">---22 percent faced issues in booking the slot online or had to try for multiple days ahead to get a slot</p> <p style="text-align:justify">---9 percent people said that they had to lose a day&#39;s wages to get themselves vaccinated.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">-- Reason for not getting vaccinated:</p> <p style="text-align:justify">---43 percent respondents stated that they could not get vaccinated because the vaccination centre had run out of vaccines when they visited the centre.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">---12 percent did not get vaccinated because they could not afford the high prices of vaccines.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The lessons from the COVID-19 vaccination drive, would not only help to improve the current response but can derive learnings improving equitable administration of any vaccine in future.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">-All vaccination should continue to be done completely free of cost through the government system; avoid the use of private hospitals to deliver vaccination;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">-Proactively release timely information on vaccination strategies, modalities and accomplishments in disaggregated, user-friendly and open source formats;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">-Prioritise allocation, distribution and administration of vaccines for marginalized, poor, vulnerable, excluded communities first, of course along with for those who are at risk;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">-Maintain record and release disaggregated data on vaccination coverage based on social and economic groups including Dalits(Scheduled Caste), Adivasis(Scheduled Tribes), Muslims, and Persons with Disabilities (PwD);<br /> &nbsp;<br /> -Bring vaccination closer to the vulnerable and extend operational hours of vaccination centres beyond 9 AM-5 PM to allow for vaccination without a loss of wages;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">-Improve information dissemination about vaccination; existing technology-based mechanisms for disseminating information about vaccination centres locations and availability of vaccines is not sufficient. It would be important to build robust and functional grievance redressal mechanisms, from national to local, to address emerging challenges. Adequate flexibility must be given to local health administrations to adapt to local circumstances;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">-Further ramp up vaccine production, especially through the use of public sector companies.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The report titled [inside]&#39;COVID-19 Third Wave Preparedness: Children&rsquo;s Vulnerability and Recovery&#39; (released on 2nd August, 2021)[/inside] is the outcome of a two-part series of online consultative meetings hosted by National Institute of Disaster Management (NIDM, Delhi). These working group consultative meetings largely included &nbsp;stakeholders from diverse backgrounds -- Central &nbsp;Government, State &nbsp;Governments, Civil Society Organisations (CSOs), social workers, humanitarians, academicians, scientists and researchers. Drawing lessons from the first and second waves, through the deliberations by leading experts during these meetings, the NIDM has been able to produce in the form of final outcome, recommendations for the preparedness of the third wave on the issues related to children and women and their well-being. Kindly <a href="/upload/files/NIDM%20report.pdf">click here</a> to access the report.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The consultative meetings held by NIDM with various stakeholders strongly recommended: a home care model, ramping up of vaccination especially for parents, nurses and other front-line workers, immediate recruitment of healthcare staffs and medical facilities for children, guarantee food security especially for the vulnerable amongst vulnerable, strengthen the community level engagement and risk awareness and communication, zero tolerance towards sexual abuse of children and women and raising awareness through a massive public outreach campaign. There is a huge gap between urban and rural India in terms of awareness, digitisation and medical facilities. It seems like the pandemic outbreak has only exacerbated social inequities and highlighted shortcomings of our society. Hence, the government must prioritise rural India and vulnerable groups in order to cope with the ongoing pandemic. This special report also outlines the women-children complementarity, suggesting that a child&rsquo;s inclusive growth largely depends on that of the mother.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">---</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> The <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/Inequality%20Report%202021%20Indias%20Unequal%20Healthcare%20Story.pdf">report</a> titled Inequality Report 2021: India&#39;s Unequal Healthcare Story examines the status of inequality across various indicators of health among different sections of the population from 2005-06 to 2015-16. The report analyses the government interventions made in terms of health programmes and its impact on health inequality. It also includes ground experiences of people, particularly the marginalised groups, during the pandemic.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The key findings of the [inside]Oxfam India&#39;s Inequality Report 2021: India&#39;s Unequal Healthcare Story (released on 19th July, 2021)[/inside] are as follows (please <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/Inequality%20Report%202021%20Indias%20Unequal%20Healthcare%20Story.pdf">click here</a> to access):&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Growing socio-economic inequalities in India are disproportionately affecting health outcomes of marginalised groups due to the absence of Universal Health Coverage (UHC), reveals Oxfam <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/Inequality%20Report%202021%20Indias%20Unequal%20Healthcare%20Story.pdf">India&rsquo;s Inequality Report</a> <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/Inequality%20Report%202021%20Indias%20Unequal%20Healthcare%20Story.pdf">2021: India&rsquo;s Unequal Healthcare Story</a>.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The new <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/Inequality%20Report%202021%20Indias%20Unequal%20Healthcare%20Story.pdf">report</a> by Oxfam India provides a comprehensive analysis of the health outcomes across different socioeconomic groups to gauge the level of health inequality that persists in the country. The report shows the general category performs better than Scheduled Castes-SCs and Scheduled Tribes-STs; Hindus perform better than Muslims; the rich perform better than the poor; men are better off than women; and the urban population is better off than the rural population on various health indicators. The COVID-19 pandemic has further exacerbated these inequalities.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The public healthcare system in India with its weak and understaffed infrastructure has been overburdened with the consistently rising cases. Private healthcare providers, on the other hand, were charging exorbitant prices, preventing the middle-class and the poor from getting diagnosed and treated until the government intervened to cap their prices. Even then, private healthcare has remained inaccessible to the poor while the rich have easily availed its services. As such, the poor and the vulnerable have mostly been dependent on the overburdened public healthcare facilities &mdash; with insufficient number of beds and inadequate human resources &mdash; for treatment or have gone without being diagnosed and treated.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Health inequalities are linked to and reflect socio-economic inequalities. Often times, it is the socio-economically marginalised communities that suffer from ill-health the most. The ongoing pandemic has revealed that the health systems in most countries are under-prepared to cope with any major health emergency and its unequal impact on the have and the have-nots.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Over the last few decades, India has made great progress in healthcare provisioning. Yet, progressively, the trend has been towards supporting the growth of the private sector in healthcare. This growth has only exacerbated the existing inequalities leaving the poor and the marginalised with no viable healthcare provisions. High costs of health services and lack of quality leads to further impoverishment of the disadvantaged.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The private health sector provided only 5-10 percent of total patient care when India gained independence. Today, it accounts for 66 percent of hospitalization and non-hospitalization cases and 33 percent of institutional births. This growth has been boosted by government concessions and has attracted domestic and foreign companies to set up tertiary care and super speciality hospitals. Within the country, the private formal sector has a distinct customer base. They are the urban-rich. Dehury et al. writes that private hospitals &lsquo;cater to a pool of patient community having health insurance, corporate tie-ups and referrals from general physicians. Usually, the paying capacity of these patients [are] higher than the common Indian citizen&hellip;these hospitals cater to the Indian elite class and organized sector workers having all financial protection.&rsquo;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The private sector is geared towards profits whereas the public provisioning of health services ensures that the poor and the marginalised have equal access to quality healthcare services closer to home. India&rsquo;s public health provisioning has, however, been weak. The public expenditure on health by the central government as a percentage of GDP was a mere 0.32 percent in 2019-20.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The combined expenditure by state and central government was about 1.16 percent of the GDP in 2019, rising marginally by 0.02 percent from 2018 &mdash; falling far behind the goal of making health expenditure 2.5 percent of the GDP. The per capita health expenditure is highest in Arunachal Pradesh at INR 9,854 and lowest in Bihar at INR 697. In the 2021-22 budget, the health ministry has been allocated a total of INR 76,901 crore, a decline of 9.8 percent from the revised estimates of 2020-21 at INR 85,250 crore.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Public funds for health has also been invested specifically in secondary and tertiary care rather than in the provisioning of primary healthcare. &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The public sector has prioritized secondary and tertiary care over primary care. Yet, experts acknowledge that primary care is the cornerstone of achieving equitable delivery and access to quality healthcare by all. While focus has been put on achieving Universal Healthcare in India; the government has selectively adopted the insurance model as a way to universalise healthcare instead of enhancing the primary health care system. As such, access to good quality public healthcare has remained fragmented and India is still far away from achieving universal coverage. The rich can avail healthcare from high-end private providers but the poor are stuck with a difficult choice. They either have to incur debts by availing health care from private providers or depend on a poor public healthcare system.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The Planning Commission in 2011 had observed that expenditure in secondary and tertiary care was drawing away attention from primary health services. Research studies substantiate this position and it is argued that &lsquo;[s]ubstantial proportions of the health budgets have been spent on&hellip;high-end tertiary medical services &mdash; all of which largely benefits the middle classes and detracts from the provision of public health services.&rsquo; Studies have also attributed India&rsquo;s high disease burden to the government&rsquo;s exclusive focus on the urban-oriented curative medical model. The government&rsquo;s focus on &lsquo;a heavily medicalized and hightech curative medical interventions&rsquo;&nbsp;has derailed the goal to make quality and affordable public healthcare accessible to all irrespective of their ability to pay. The result has been a widening of health inequalities along caste, class, gender and geography.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; To make the goals of National Health Mission (NRHM and National Urban Health Mission were subsumed under the NHM in 2013) a reality, there needs to be a strong public health infrastructure in place, even in hard-to-reach areas. Sufficient medical supplies, equipment, drugs and trained medical staff in health centres should be the standard. On the contrary, public health centres remain understaffed with limited supplies.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Among other things, the Inequality Report 2021 on health has recommended the government to increase health spending to 2.5 percent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) to ensure a more equitable health system in the country; ensure that union budgetary allocation in health for SCs and STs is proportionate to their population; prioritize primary health by ensuring that two-thirds of the health budget is allocated for strengthening primary healthcare; state governments to allocate their expenditure on health to 2.5 percent of Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP); the centre should extend financial support to the states with low per capita health expenditure to reduce inter-state inequality in health. It has asked to widen the ambit of insurance schemes to include out-patient care. The major expenditures on health happen through out-patient costs as consultations, diagnostic tests, medicines, etc. While the report does not endorse Government-financed Health Insurance Schemes (GFHIS) as a way to achieve UHC and stresses that insurance can only be a component of it, it is imperative that GFHIS widens its ambit to include outpatient costs as a way to reduce out-of-pocket expenditure (OOPE).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The Constitution of India does not guarantee a fundamental right to health though it does refer to the role of the government in the provisioning of healthcare to all its citizens. Therefore, the right to health should be enacted as a fundamental right that makes it obligatory for the government to ensure equal access to timely, acceptable, and affordable healthcare of appropriate quality, and address the underlying determinants of health to close the gap in health outcomes between the rich and poor.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; With the lockdown aimed at checking the spread of COVID-19, health systems prioritized services related only to COVID-19. Human and material resources like hospitals, beds and intensive care units were diverted towards the management and treatment of COVID-19 patients. Health services catering to non-Covid illnesses were halted, leading to unprecedented hardships and sufferings for chronic patients and those requiring immediate medical intervention such as pregnant women. Accessibility to non-Covid medical services were grimmer for patients in rural and hard-to-reach areas as compared to urban areas due to the unavailability of health centres in the vicinity and the lack of transportation facilities.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Disruptions in the availability of drugs for non-communicable diseases (NCD), tuberculosis (TB), contraceptive and other essential services were also reported. Telemedicine &mdash; the practice of caring for patients remotely &mdash; for which guidelines were issued by the Government of India in March 2020 to facilitate access to medical advice made consultations easier. However, for those with no smart phones and internet connectivity, particularly in rural and hard-to-reach areas, seeking medical advice remained a difficult task. The immunization drive was also disrupted. India vaccinates around 20 million children every year and its disruption might add to the largest number of unimmunized children in the world.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The National Health Profile in 2017 recorded one government allopathic doctor for every 10,189 people and one state-run hospital for every 90,343 people. India also ranks the lowest in the number of hospital beds per thousand population among the BRICS nations &mdash; Russia scores the highest (7.12), followed by China (4.3), South Africa (2.3), Brazil (2.1) and India (0.5). India also ranks lower than some of the lesser developed countries such as Bangladesh (0.87), Chile (2.11) and Mexico (0.98).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The current expenditure on health, by the Centre and the state governments combined, is only about 1.25 percent of GDP which is the lowest among the BRICS countries &mdash; Brazil (9.2) has the highest allocation, followed by South Africa (8.1), Russia (5.3) and China (5.0). It is also lower than some of its neighbouring countries such as Bhutan (2.5 percent) and Sri Lanka (1.6 percent). The low priority given to health expenditure is also reflected in the share in total expenditure of the government, which is only 4 percent whereas the global average stands at 11 percent. In Oxfam&rsquo;s Commitment to Reducing Inequality Report 2020, India ranks 154th in health spending, fifth from the bottom. This poor spending is reflected in the inadequate health resources and infrastructure. Only around 50,069 health and wellness centres (HWCs), which are envisaged to deliver comprehensive primary healthcare (CPHC) closer to homes, are functional. These centres are only 65 percent of the cumulative target for 2020-21. Moreover, in 2019, less than 10 percent of PHCs were funded as per IPHS norms whereas the rest remained underfunded.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Different studies have proved that low public health expenditure yields worse health outcomes. Studies by Barenberg et al. investigated the impact of public health expenditure on Infant Mortality Rate (IMR) and found a negative relationship between the two. Farahani et al. evaluated the relationship between state-level public health spending of India and individual mortality across all age groups using household-level data from the third National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3) showing that a 10 percent increase in public spending on health decreases mortality by about 2 percent, with effects mainly concentrated on women, the young, and the elderly.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The out-of-pocket health expenditure of 64.2 percent in India is higher than the world average of 18.2 percent. Exorbitant prices of healthcare has forced many to sell household assets and incur debts.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The global average for life expectancy is 72.6 years but India (69.42) remains below the global average. It is also lower than the neighbouring countries Nepal (70.8), Bhutan (71.8), Bangladesh (72.6), and Sri Lanka (77) and its BRICS counterparts Brazil (75.9), China (76.9), and Russia (72.6).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; A comprehensive provisioning of public health as water, sanitation and primary healthcare is the most efficient and cost-effective way to achieve UHC around the world.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Evidence from Thailand and Sri Lanka, which have performed better than India with regard to universal access to healthcare, shows that these countries have a high public provisioning of services. Also, evidence from developed countries like Germany, Sweden, Canada and developing countries like Costa Rica reveal that successful insurance-based healthcare system was attained with high levels of public spending and government provisioning of healthcare services.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The Oxfam India <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/Inequality%20Report%202021%20Indias%20Unequal%20Healthcare%20Story.pdf">report</a> says that &lsquo;Kerala invested in infrastructure to create a multi-layered health system, designed to provide first-contact access for basic services at the community level and expanded integrated primary healthcare coverage to achieve access to a range of preventive and curative services&hellip;[,] expanded the number of medical facilities, hospital beds, and doctors&hellip;[and] public health and social development initiatives&hellip; aided in creating the environment for a strong and effective primary care system.&rsquo;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="/upload/files/SOPonCOVID19Containment%26ManagementinPeriurbanRural%26tribalareas.pdf">click here</a> to access the [inside]Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) on COVID-19 Containment and Management in Peri-urban, Rural and Tribal areas[/inside] dated 16th May, 2021. The SOP was issued by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>---</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">The key findings of the report titled [inside]Rural Health Statistics 2019-20 (released in April 2021)[/inside], which has been prepared by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, are as follows (please <a href="/upload/files/Rural%20Health%20Statistics%202019-20%20report%20MoHFW%20latest%20available%282%29.pdf">click here</a> to access):</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; As on 31st March, 2020, there were 1,55,404 and 2,517 Sub Centres (SCs), 24,918 and 5,895 Primary Health Centres (PHCs) and 5,183 and 466 Community Health Centres (CHCs), respectively, which were functioning in rural and urban areas of the country.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average rural population covered by a Sub Centre was 5,729 as on 1st July, 2020, whereas the norm is that one Sub Centre should be serving a population of size in the range 300-5,000.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average population in tribal/ hilly/ desert areas covered by a Sub Centre was 3,381 as on 1st July, 2020, whereas the norm is that one Sub Centre should be serving a population of size up to 3,000 in such areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; A Sub Centre is the most peripheral and first contact point between the primary health care system and the community. Sub Centres are assigned tasks relating to interpersonal communication in order to bring about behavioral change and provide services in relation to maternal and child health, family welfare, nutrition, immunisation, diarrhoea control and control of communicable diseases programmes. Each Sub Centre is required to be manned by at least one auxiliary nurse midwife (ANM) / female health worker and one male health worker. Under the National Rural Health Mission (NRHM), there is a provision for one additional second ANM on contract basis. One lady health visitor (LHV) is entrusted with the task of supervision of six Sub Centres. The Government of India bears the salary of ANM and LHV while the salary of the Male Health Worker is borne by the state governments.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average rural population covered by a Primary Health Centre (PHC) was 35,730 as on 1st July, 2020, whereas the norm is that one Primary Health Centre should be serving a population of size in the range 20,000-30,000.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average population in tribal/ hilly/ desert areas covered by a PHC was 23,930 as on 1st July, 2020, whereas the norm is that one PHC should be serving a population of size up to 20,000 in such areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; PHC is the first contact point between the village community and the medical officer. The PHCs were envisaged to provide an integrated curative and preventive health care to the rural population with emphasis on preventive and promotive aspects of health care. The PHCs are established and maintained by the state governments under the Minimum Needs Programme (MNP)/ Basic Minimum Services (BMS) Programme. As per minimum requirement, a PHC is to be manned by a medical officer supported by 14 paramedical and other staff. Under NRHM, there is a provision for two additional staff nurses at PHCs on contract basis. It acts as a referral unit for 6 Sub Centres and has 4-6 beds for patients. The activities of PHC involve curative, preventive, promotive and family welfare services.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average rural population covered by a Community Health Centre was 1,71,779 as on 1st July, 2020, whereas the norm is that one Community Health Centre should be serving a population of size in the range 80,000-1,20,000.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average population in tribal/ hilly/ desert areas covered by a CHC was 97,178 as on 1st July, 2020, whereas the norm is that one CHC should be serving a population of size up to 80,000 in such areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; CHCs are being established and maintained by the state government under Minimum Needs Program (MNP)/Basic Minimum Services (BMS) programme. As per minimum norms, a CHC is required to be manned by four medical specialists i.e. surgeon, physician, gynecologist and pediatrician supported by 21 paramedical and other staff. It has 30 indoor beds with one OT, X-ray, labour room and laboratory facilities. It serves as a referral centre for 4 PHCs and also provides facilities for obstetric care and specialist consultations.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em>Rural Health Care System in India</em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Out of the sanctioned posts, a significant percentage of posts were vacant at all the levels. Nearly 14.1 percent of the sanctioned posts of Health Worker (Female)/ ANM (at SCs +PHCs) were vacant as compared to 37 percent vacancies of Health Worker (Male) in 2020. At PHCs, 37.6 percent of the sanctioned posts of Health Assistant (Male + Female) and 24.1 percent of the sanctioned posts of Doctors were vacant in 2020.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The availability of manpower is one of the important prerequisites for the efficient functioning of the Rural Health services. As on 31st March, 2020, the overall shortfall (which excludes the existing surplus in some of the states) in the posts of Health Worker (Female) / ANM was 2 percent of the total requirement as per the norm of one HW(F)/ ANM per Sub Centre and PHC. The overall shortfall was mainly due to the shortfall in states of Gujarat (1073), Himachal Pradesh (992), Rajasthan (657), Tripura (389) and Kerala (277). Similarly, in case of Health Worker (Male), there was a shortfall of 65.5 percent of the requirement.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; PHC is the first contact point between the village community and the Medical Officer. Manpower in PHC includes a Medical Officer supported by paramedical and other staff. In the case of PHC, for Health Assistant (male + female), the shortfall was 71.9 percent. For allopathic doctors at PHC, there was a shortfall of 6.8 percent of the total requirement at all India level. This shortfall happened due to a significant shortfall of doctors at PHCs in the states of Odisha (461), Chhattisgarh (404), Rajasthan (249), Madhya Pradesh (134), Uttar Pradesh (121) and Karnataka (105).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The Community Health Centres provide specialised medical care of Surgeons, Obstetricians &amp; Gynecologists, Physicians and Pediatricians. The latest available position of specialists manpower at CHCs as on 31st March, 2020 shows that out of the sanctioned posts, 68.4 percent of Surgeons, 56.1 percent of Obstetricians &amp; Gynecologists, 66.8 percent of physicians and 63.1 percent of pediatricians were vacant. Overall 63.3 percent of the sanctioned posts of specialists at CHCs were vacant. Moreover, as compared to requirements for existing infrastructure, there was a shortfall of 78.9 percent of Surgeons, 69.7 percent of Obstetricians &amp; Gynecologists, 78.2 percent of Physicians and 78.2 percent of Pediatricians. Overall, there was a shortfall of 76.1 percent of specialists at the CHCs as compared to the requirement for existing CHCs. The shortfall of specialists was significantly high in most of the states. However, in addition to the specialists, about 15,342 General Duty Medical Officers (GDMOs) Allopathic and 702 AYUSH Specialists along with 2,720 GDMO AYUSH were also available at CHCs as on 31st March, 2020. In addition to this, there were 890 Anaesthetists and 301 Eye Surgeons available at CHCs as on 31st March, 2020.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Comparison of the manpower position of major categories in 2020 with that in 2019 shows an overall decrease in the number of ANMs at SCs &amp; PHCs and Doctors at PHCs during the period. However, there was an increase in the number of Specialists at CHCs. The number of Specialists at CHCs had increased from 3,881 in 2019 to 4,857 in 2020, which was an increase of 27.7 percent.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Considering the status of paramedical staff, there was an increase of Lab Technicians from 18,715 in 2019 to 19,903 in 2020 at PHCs and CHCs. There was a marginal decrease in the number of pharmacists from 26,204 in 2019 to 25,792 in 2020. A significant decrease was also observed in nursing staff under PHC &amp; CHCs from 80,976 in 2019 to 71,847 in 2020. The number of radiographers had increased marginally from 2,419 in 2019 to 2,434 in 2020.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; A total of 1,193 Sub Divisional/ Sub District Hospitals were functioning as on 31st March, 2020 throughout the country. In these hospitals, 13,399 doctors were available. In addition to these doctors, about 29,937 paramedical staff were also available at those hospitals as on 31st March, 2020. The number of doctors in Sub Divisional/ Sub District Hospitals had reduced from 13,750 in 2019 to 13,399 in 2020. The number of paramedical staff in Sub Divisional/ Sub District Hospitals fell from 36,909 in 2019 to 29,937 in 2020.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In addition to above, 810 District Hospitals (DHs) were also functioning as on 31st March, 2020 throughout the country. There were 22,827 doctors available in the DHs. In addition to the doctors, about 80,920 paramedical staff were also available at District Hospitals as on 31st March, 2020. The number of doctors in District Hospitals went down from 24,676 in 2019 to 22,827 in 2020. The number of paramedical staff in District Hospitals fell from 85,194 in 2019 to 80,920 in 2020.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; As per the Health &amp; Wellness Centre (HWC) portal data, there were a total of 38,595 HWCs functional in India as on 31st March 2020. In total, 18,610 SCs had been converted into HWC-SCs. Also at the level of PHC, a total of 19,985 PHCs had been converted into HWC-PHCs. Out of 19,985 HWC-PHCs, 16,635 PHCs had been converted into HWCs in rural areas and 3,350 in urban areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">**page**</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">Kindly <a href="/upload/files/LASI_India_Factsheet.pdf">click here</a> to access the [inside]India Fact Sheet of Longitudinal Ageing Study in India (LASI) -- Wave-1 (released in 2021)[/inside], An Investigation of Health, Economic, and Social Well-being of India&rsquo;s Growing Elderly Population, India Report 2020, prepared by International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), National Programme for Health Care Elderly (NPHCE), Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health (HSPH), University&nbsp; of Southern California (USC) and Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MoHFW).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="/upload/files/LASI_India_Executive_Summary.pdf">click here</a> to read the [inside]Executive Summary of Longitudinal Ageing Study in India (LASI) -- Wave-1 (released in 2021)[/inside].</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>---</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to the report entitled [inside]A Neglected Tragedy: The global burden of stillbirths -- Report of the UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation, 2020 (released in October 2020)[/inside] (please click <a href="https://www.im4change.org/upload/files/UN-IGME-the-global-burden-of-stillbirths-2020.pdf">here</a> to access):</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; About one stillbirth occurs every 16 seconds, which means that every year, about 2 million babies are stillborn i.e. showing no signs of life at birth. It means every day, almost 5,400 babies are stillborn. Globally, one in 72 babies is stillborn.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In the past two decades, 48 million babies were stillborn. Three-in-four stillbirths occur in sub-Saharan Africa or Southern Asia. Low and lower-middle income countries account for 84 percent of all stillbirths but only 62 percent of all live births.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Stillbirths are largely absent in worldwide data tracking, rendering the true extent of the problem hidden. They are invisible in policies and programmes and underfinanced as an area requiring intervention. Targets specific to stillbirths were absent from the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and are still missing in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; There are a variety of reasons behind the slow reduction in stillbirth rates: absence of or poor quality of care during pregnancy and birth; lack of investment in preventative interventions and the health workforce; inadequate social recognition of stillbirths as a burden on families; measurement challenges and major data gaps; absence of global and national leadership; and no established global targets, such as the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Globally, an estimated 42 percent of all stillbirths are intrapartum (i.e., the baby died during labour); almost all of these 832,000 stillborn deaths that occurred in 2019 could have been prevented with access to high-quality care during childbirth, including ongoing intrapartum monitoring and timely intervention in case of complications.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Around 20 million babies are projected to be stillborn in the next decade, if trends observed between 2000 and 2019 in reducing the stillbirth rate continue. Among the 20 million, 2.9 million stillbirths could be prevented by accelerating progress to meet the ENAP target in the 56 countries at risk to miss the goal. Every Newborn Action Plan (ENAP) calls for each country to achieve a rate of 12 stillbirths or fewer per 1,000 total births by 2030 and to close equity gaps.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In the first two decades of this century (i.e. 2000-2019), the annual rate of reduction (ARR) in the stillbirth rate was just -2.3 percent, compared to a -2.9 percent reduction in neonatal mortality and -4.3 percent among children aged 1&ndash;59 months. Meanwhile, between 2000 and 2017, maternal mortality decreased by -2.9 percent.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In the year 2000, the ratio of the number of stillbirths to the number of under-five deaths was 0.30; by 2019, it had increased to 0.38. So, stillbirths are an increasingly critical global health problem.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; National stillbirth rates around the globe ranged from 1.4 to 32.2 stillbirths per 1,000 total births in 2019. Sub-Saharan Africa, followed by Southern Asia, had the highest stillbirth rate and the greatest number of stillbirths.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Six countries bore the burden of half of all stillbirths of the world &ndash; India, Pakistan, Nigeria, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, China and Ethiopia, in order of burden (highest to lowest).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Nearly 3,40,622 of the 19,66,000&nbsp; stillbirths globally in 2019 were in India, making it the country with the largest such burden (i.e. 17.33 percent).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2019, India, Pakistan and Nigeria alone accounted for one-third of the total burden of stillbirths and 27 percent of live births.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Stillbirth rate is defined as the ratio of the number of still births per 1,000 live births and stillbirths taken together (i.e. total births).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Some progress has been made in preventing stillbirths. Globally, the stillbirth rate declined by 35 percent since 2000. Since 2000, the stillbirth rate declined by 44 percent in Central and Southern Asia, 53 percent in India, 52 percent in Kazakhstan and 44 percent in Nepal.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Among the lower-middle income countries, stillbirth rate fell by 39 percent since 2000. Since the year 2000, stillbirth rate in lower-middle income countries like Mongolia, India and El Salvador declined by 57 percent, 53 percent and 50 percent, respectively.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; A total of 14 countries &ndash; including three low- and lower middle income countries (Cambodia, India, Mongolia) &ndash; slashed the stillbirth rate by more than half during 2000-2019.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The top 15 countries with the greatest percentage decline in the stillbirth rate during 2000&ndash;2019 are China (63 percent), Turkey (63 percent), Georgia (62 percent), North Macedonia (62 percent), Belarus (60 percent), Mongolia (57 percent), Netherlands (55 percent), Azerbaijan (53 percent), Estonia (53 percent), India (53 percent), Kazakhstan (52 percent), Romania (52 percent), El Salvador (50 percent), Peru (48 percent) and Latvia (46 percent).<br /> &nbsp;<br /> &bull; India&#39;s stillbirth rate (i.e. (stillbirths per 1,000 total births) in 2000 was 29.6, in 2010 was 20.2 and in 2019 was 13.9. The percentage decline in India&#39;s stillbirth rate during 2000&ndash;2019 was -53.0 percent. The annual rate of reduction (ARR) in stillbirth rate during 2000-2019 was -4.0 percent.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The total number of stillbirths in India was 852,386 in 2000, 535,683 in 2010 and 340,622 in 2019. The percentage decline in stillbirths during 2000&ndash;2019 was -60.0 percent. The annual rate of reduction (ARR) in total number of stillbirths during 2000&ndash;2019 was -4.8 percent. India witnessed 24,116,000 livebirths and 24,457,000 total births in 2019. &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Women in sub-Saharan Africa and Southern Asia bear the greatest burden of stillbirths in the world. More than three quarters of estimated stillbirths in 2019 occurred in these two regions, with 42 percent of the global total in sub-Saharan Africa and 34 percent in Southern Asia.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2019, stillbirth rate per 1,000 total births in Afghanistan was 28.4 (total stillbirth in 2019: 35,384), Bangladesh was 24.3 (total stillbirth in 2019: 72,508), Bhutan was 9.7 (total stillbirth in 2019: 127), China was 5.5 (total stillbirth in 2019: 92,170), India was 13.9 (total stillbirth in 2019: 340,622), Maldives was 5.8 (total stillbirth in 2019: 41), Myanmar was 14.1 (total stillbirth in 2019: 13,493), Nepal was 17.5 (total stillbirth in 2019: 9,997), Pakistan was 30.6 (total stillbirth in 2019: 190,483) and Sri Lanka was 5.8 (total stillbirth in 2019: 1,943).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Data are essential to understanding the burden of stillbirths and identifying where, when and why they occur.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Immediate actions are needed to strengthen data systems and their ability to collect, analyses and use timely, quality and disaggregated stillbirth data. To improve stillbirth data availability and quality, it is recommended that countries and relevant stakeholders:</p> <p style="text-align:justify">a. Align the stillbirth definition and measures with international standards<br /> b.&nbsp; Integrate stillbirth-specific components within relevant plans for data system strengthening and improvement<br /> c. Record stillbirth outcomes in all relevant maternal and newborn health programs, including routine HMIS (registers and monthly reporting forms)<br /> d. Provide training and support to include stillbirths within civil and vital registration systems as the coverage of these systems increases<br /> e. Include information on timing of stillbirth (antepartum or intrapartum) in all settings and record causes and contributing factors to stillbirth where possible<br /> f. Report and review stillbirth data locally &ndash; at facility or district level &ndash; alongside data on neonatal deaths (by day of death) to reduce incentives for misreporting of outcomes, and to monitor potential misclassification.<br /> g. Collate reported stillbirth rate data up the data system to a national level to enable tracking of progress towards the ENAP target of 12 stillbirths or fewer per 1,000 total births in every country by 2030 and to enable monitoring of geographical inequities.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Ending preventable stillbirths is among the core goals of the UN&rsquo;s Global Strategy for Women&rsquo;s, Children&rsquo;s and Adolescents&rsquo; Health (2016&ndash;2030) and the Every Newborn Action Plan (ENAP). These global initiatives aim to reduce the stillbirth rate to 12 or fewer third trimester (late) stillbirths per 1,000 total births in every country by 2030.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The stillbirth rate (SBR) is defined as the number of babies born with no signs of life at 28 weeks or more of gestation, per 1,000 total births. The stillbirth rate is calculated as: SBR = 1000 * {sb/(sb+lb)}, where &#39;sb&#39; refers to the number of stillbirths &ge; 28 weeks or more of gestational age; and &#39;lb&#39; refers to the number of live births regardless of gestational age or birthweight.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> <strong><em>[Shivangini Piplani, who is doing her MA in Finance and Investment (1st year) from Berlin School of Business and Innovation, assisted the Inclusive Media for Change team in preparing the summary of &#39;A Neglected Tragedy: The global burden of stillbirths -- Report of the UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation, 2020.&#39; She did this work as part of her winter internship at the Inclusive Media for Change project in December 2020.]</em></strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> The Sample Registration System (SRS) is carried out by the Office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner, India with the goal of providing accurate annual estimates of birth rates, death rates, child mortality rates and many other indices of pregnancy and fertility and mortality. The SRS has been providing data for the estimation of various mortality measures since its inception. The report provides mortality indices at the national and state levels, as well as death rates at the sub-state, viz. NSS Natural Division Level. &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The key findings of [inside]Sample Registration System Statistical Report 2018 (released in June 2020)[/inside], published by the Office of the Registrar General &amp; Census Commissioner, are as follows (please <a href="/upload/files/SRS_Statistical_Report_2018.pdf"><span style="background-color:#ffffff">click here</span></a> to access):</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Crude Death Rate (CDR)</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Crude Death Rate (CDR), which is defined as the number of deaths in a year per thousand population, at the national level, stood at 6.2 in 2018. It was 6.7 in rural areas and 5.1 in urban areas. For all bigger states/ UTs, except West Bengal, the CDR in rural areas was higher than that in urban areas. For West Bengal, CDR in rural (CDR 5.6) and urban (CDR 5.7) areas were almost identical, which makes the state the closest to the Line of Equity vis-&agrave;-vis other states/ UTs.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; States that exhibited large differences between urban CDR and rural CDR in 2018 were: Telangana (3 points), Punjab (2.6), Tamil Nadu (2.5), Andhra Pradesh (2.4), Karnataka (2.4), Chhattisgarh (2.3 points) and Himachal Pradesh (2.3). The difference is calculated as Rural CDR - Urban CDR = Difference in CDRs.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The top 5 states with the highest CDRs in 2018 were: Chhattisgarh (8.0), Odisha (7.3), Kerala (6.9), Himachal Pradesh (6.9) and Andhra Pradesh (6.7).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Between the periods 2006-08 and 2016-18, the average CDR at the national level changed by &ndash;14.9 percentage points. Between the above-said time points, CDR declined for all states, except Kerala, which showed an increase of 6 percentage points possibly due to the changes in age structure of its population.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Infant Mortality Rate (IMR)</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Infant Mortality Rate (IMR) is defined as the number of infant (less than one year of age) deaths per one thousand live births during the year.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; IMR has seen a substantial decline over the years, from 129 per 1000 live births in 1971 to 110 in 1981 and from 80 in 1991 to 32 in 2018.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; At the national level, IMR was 36.8 in rural areas and 22.9 in urban areas during the period 2016-18. However, IMR was 36 in rural areas and 23 in urban areas in 2018.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2018, Kerala had the lowest IMR of 7 and Madhya Pradesh had the highest IMR of 48.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2018, at the national level, IMR among male infants stood at 32, while that for female infants it was 33.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; For the year 2018, in all states except Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Delhi, Gujarat, Haryana, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Odisha, Punjab, Tamil Nadu, Telangana and Uttarakhand, female infants experienced a higher mortality rate as compared to male infants.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2018, Jharkhand had the highest difference between male IMR (27) and female IMR (34), followed by Bihar with a large difference between male IMR (30) and female IMR (35). As opposed to that, in Madhya Pradesh male IMR (51) exceeded female IMR (46).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2018, Assam witnessed the highest inequity between rural and urban IMRs with its rural IMR at 44 and urban IMR at 20. States like West Bengal (Urban IMR 20, Rural IMR 22), Punjab (Urban IMR 19, Rural IMR 21), Uttarakhand (Urban IMR 29, Rural IMR 31) and Bihar (Urban IMR 30, Rural IMR 32) had the least inequity between rural and urban IMR.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Between 2006-08 and 2016-18, the average IMR declined by -40.3 percent. In rural areas, decline in IMR between the above-said time points ranged from -63.9 percentage points in Delhi to -32.2 percentage points in Chhattisgarh. The highest fall in IMR in urban areas between the above-said time points was noticed in Delhi i.e. -56.4 percent.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Neonatal Mortality Rate</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Neo-natal Mortality Rate (NMR) is defined as the number of infant (less than 29 days) deaths per one thousand live births during the year.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2018, at the national level, NMR was 23, while in rural and urban areas, they were 27 and 14, respectively.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2018, NMR was the lowest in Kerala at 5 and highest in Madhya Pradesh at 35.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; At the national level, the percentage of neo-natal deaths to total infant deaths was 71.7 percent in 2018, and it was 60.1 percent in urban areas and 74.4 percent in rural areas. It means that most infants die when they are not even 30 days old.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Perinatal Mortality Rate</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Peri-natal mortality rate (PMR) is defined as the number of still births and infant deaths of less than 7 days per 1,000 live births (LB) and still births (SB) taken together during the year.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; At the national level, PMR has been estimated to be 22 in 2018. It was 25 in rural areas and 14 in urban areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2018, Madhya Pradesh had the highest PMR at 30 and Kerala had the lowest PMR at 10.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Still Birth Rate</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Still Birth Rate (SBR) is defined as the ratio of the number of still births per one thousand live births and still births taken together.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; At the national level, the SBR has been estimated to be 4 in 2018.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2018, the highest SBR has been estimated for Odisha (10) and lowest have been estimated for Jammu and Kashmir and Jharkhand (i.e. 1 each).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Under-five Mortality Rate (U5MR)</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Under-five Mortality Rate (U5MR) is the probability of dying between birth and exactly age 5, expressed per 1,000 live births.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; At the national level, U5MR has been estimated to be 36 in 2018. In urban areas, the U5MR in 2018 has been estimated to be 26 while in rural areas, it has been estimated to be 40.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Estimated U5MR was the lowest in Kerala at 10 and was the highest in Madhya Pradesh at 56.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; At the national level, female U5MR (37) was higher than the male U5MR (36) in 2018.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2018, female U5MRs were higher than that of male U5MR in all states except in Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Delhi, Gujarat, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Odisha, Punjab, Tamil Nadu and Uttarakhand.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Age-Specific Mortality Rates (ASMR)</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Age-specific Mortality Rate (ASMR), is defined as the number of deaths in a particular age-group per thousand population of the same age-group during the year.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong><em>5-14 Age Group</em></strong><br /> &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;<br /> &bull; At the national level, the ASDR for the 5-14 age group has been estimated to be 0.5 in 2018.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2018, the lowest ASDR for the 5-14 age group was found for Kerala and Assam (0.2 each) and the highest ASDR for the 5-14 age group was observed in case of Bihar, Odisha, Madhya and Chhattisgarh (0.7 each).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; At the national level, although ASDR for the 5-14 age group was the same for males and females in urban areas (0.4 each), ASDR for the 5-14 age group among females was 0.6 and among males was 0.5 in rural areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong><em>15-59 Age Group</em></strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; At the national level, ASDR for the 15-59 age group has been estimated to be 3.2 in rural areas and 2.3 in urban areas. At the national level, the ASDR for the 15-59 age group was 2.9 in 2018.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2018, the female ASDR for the 15-59 age group was lower than that of male ASDR for the 15-59 age group in all the states.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong><em>60 and Above Age Group</em></strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; At the national level, ASDR for the 60 and above age group has been estimated to be 42.6.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; ASDR for the 60 and above age group among males (45.9) was greater than that among females (39.5). The same trend existed for rural and urban areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; ASDR for the 60 and above age group has been estimated to be the highest in Chhattisgarh (58.9) and lowest in Delhi (28.3).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Sex Ratio at Birth (SRB)</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Sex Ratio at Birth (SRB) is defined as the number of female births per 1000 male births during the year.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The 3 years&rsquo; average of SRB (in the period 2016-18) has been estimated to be 899. At the national level, it was 900 in rural areas and 897 in urban areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; For 2016-18, the average SRB was the highest in Chhattisgarh at 958 and it was the lowest in Uttarakhand at 840.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In rural areas, Chhattisgarh had the highest SRB of 976 and Haryana had the lowest SRB of 840 in the period 2016-18. &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In urban areas, Madhya Pradesh had the highest SRB of 968 and Uttarakhand had the lowest SRB at 810 in the period 2016-18.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong><em>[Meghana Myadam and Sakhi Arun Jagdale, who are doing their MA in Development Studies (1st year) from Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Hyderabad, assisted the Inclusive Media for Change team in preparing the summary of the report by the Office of the Registrar General &amp; Census Commissioner<em>.</em> They did this work as part of their summer internship at the Inclusive Media for Change project in July 2020.]</em></strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="/upload/files/FAQ.pdf">click here</a> to access the [inside]FAQ on COVID-19 prepared by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare[/inside].</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="/upload/files/Containment%20Plan%20for%20Large%20Outbreaks%20of%20COVID19%20Final.pdf">click here</a> to access the [inside]Containment Plan for Large Outbreaks Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019[/inside] (COVID-19), which has been prepared by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">---</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/Background-Paper-COVID19.pdf">click here</a> to read the [inside]Background Note on COVID-19[/inside], which was prepared by Jan Swasthya Abhiyan (JSA) and All India People&rsquo;s Science Network(AIPSN), dated 16th March, 2020.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/Statement-COVID19.pdf">click here</a> to read the [inside]Statement on the COVID-19 pandemic[/inside], which was released by Jan Swasthya Abhiyan (JSA) and All India People&rsquo;s Science Network(AIPSN) on 16th March, 2020.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">---</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/High%20Level%20group%20of%20Health%20Sector.pdf" title="High Level group of Health Sector">click here</a> to access the Report of the [inside]High Level Group on Health Sector (2019), submitted to the Fifteenth Finance Commission of India[/inside]. The members of the High Level Group on Health were Dr. Randeep Guleria, Dr. Devi Shetty, Dr. Dileep Govind Mhaisekar, Dr. Naresh Trehan, Dr. Bhabatosh Biswas and Prof. K Srinath Reddy.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">---</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Press%20Note%20NSS%2075th%20Round%20Report%20Key%20Indicators%20of%20Social%20Consumption%20in%20India%20Health%20July%202017%20to%20June%202018%20released%20on%2023rd%20November%202019.pdf" title="Press Note NSS 75th Round Report Key Indicators of Social Consumption in India Health July 2017 to June 2018 released on 23rd November 2019">click here</a> to access the major findings of [inside]NSS 75th Round Report: Key Indicators of Social Consumption in India: Health, July 2017 to June 2018 (released on 23rd November 2019)[/inside].<br /> <br /> Kindly <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Key%20Indicators%20of%20Social%20Consumption%20in%20India%20Health.pdf" title="Key Indicators of Social Consumption in India Health">click here</a> to access the NSS 75th Round Report: Key Indicators of Social Consumption in India: Health, July 2017 to June 2018 (released on 23rd November 2019).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <div style="text-align:justify">The key findings of the [inside]2019 India TB report (released in September 2019)[/inside], which has been produced by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, are as follows (please <a href="https://tbcindia.gov.in/WriteReadData/India%20TB%20Report%202019.pdf">click here</a> and <a href="https://tbcindia.gov.in/index1.php?lang=1&amp;level=1&amp;sublinkid=4160&amp;lid=2807">click here</a> to access):</div> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> &bull; The country accounted for a quarter of the global tuberculosis (TB) burden with an estimated 27 lakh cases in 2018.<br /> <br /> &bull; In 2018, the country was able to achieve a total notification of 21.5 lakh TB cases, of which 25 percent was from private sector. Majority of the TB burden is among the working age group. Nearly 89 percent of TB cases came from the age group 15-69 years. About two-third of the TB patients were males.<br /> <br /> &bull; Among the notified, treatment was initiated for about 19.1 lakh cases (almost 90 percent), across both public and private sectors.<br /> <br /> &bull; HIV co-infection among TB patient was nearly fifty thousand cases amounting to TB-HIV co-infection rate of 3.4 percent.<br /> <br /> &bull; In 2018, TB notification has increased to 5.37 lakhs. This is an increase by 35 percent in notification from private sector in comparison to 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; Based on private drug sales data, it could be said that in 2016 there was about 1.59 times patients in the private sector as compared to the public sector (approximately 22.7 lakh patients in total).<br /> <br /> &bull; In India about 80 percent of the outpatient care is provided by private health care providers. Considering the quantum of private sector, it necessitates to leverage their capacity to expand health coverage.<br /> <br /> &bull; TB is a notifiable disease vide 2012 as per declaration of Government of India Order. This has expanded the ambit of TB surveillance covering all public as well as private health facilities. The healthcare providers shall notify every TB cases to local authorities such as District Health Officers/ Chief Medical Officers of a district and Municipal Health Officer of a municipal corporation. This notification should be done every month. The surveillance begins with the notification, and completed with acting on the information gathered. In <a href="tinymce/uploaded/TB%20notification%20Gazette%20of%20India%20dated%2019%20March%202018.pdf" title="TB notification Gazette of India dated 19 March 2018">March 2018</a>, the notification was published in Gazette of India, making it mandatory for private providers to notify TB patients and public health system to act upon it.<br /> <br /> &bull; Uttar Pradesh, with 17 percent of population of the country, is the largest contributor to TB cases, with 20 percent of the total notifications, accounting for about 4.2 lakh cases (187 cases per lakh population).<br /> <br /> &bull; Delhi and Chandigarh stand apart from all other states and UTs with regard to notification rates relative to their resident population. Annual notification rates in Delhi and Chandigarh were 504 cases per lakh population and 496 cases per lakh population, respectively. This is because patients residing in other parts of the country are diagnosed/ notified from these two UTs.<br /> <br /> &bull; In 2018, the Revised National Tuberculosis Control Programme (RNTCP) notified 21.5 lakh TB cases, a 16 percent increase over 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; The largest ever National Drug Resistance Survey in the world for 13 anti-TB drugs has been completed and it has indicated about 6.2 percent prevalence of drug resistant TB in the country among all TB patients.<br /> <br /> &bull; The Government of India is prioritising resource allocations for TB in the country with more than Rs. 12,000 crores being invested in the implementation of the National Strategic Plan to End TB 2017-2025. The government has started the Nikshay Poshan Yojana (NPY) for nutritional support to TB patients.&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; It is expected that the country would be able to cover all TB cases through the online notification system -- NIKSHAY.<br /> &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The ending preventable maternal mortality (EPMM) target for reducing the global maternal mortality ratio (MMRatio) by 2030 was adopted as Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) target 3.1: reduce global MMRatio to less than 70 per lakh live births by 2030. Having targets for mortality reduction is important, but accurate measurement of maternal mortality remains challenging and many deaths still go uncounted. Many countries still lack well-functioning civil registration and vital statistics (CRVS) systems, and where such systems do exist, reporting errors &ndash; whether incompleteness (unregistered deaths, also known as &ldquo;missing&rdquo;) or misclassification of cause of death &ndash; continue to pose a major challenge to data accuracy. The report entitled &#39;Trends in Maternal Mortality 2000 to 2017: Estimates by World Health Orgnization (WHO), United Nations Children&#39;s Fund (UNICEF), World Bank Group, United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) and the United Nations Population Division presents internationally comparable global, regional and country-level estimates and trends for maternal mortality between 2000 and 2017.<br /> <br /> The new estimates presented in this report supersede all previously published estimates for years that fall within the same time period. Care should be taken to use only these estimates for the interpretation of trends in maternal mortality from 2000 to 2017; due to modifications in methodology and data availability, differences between these and previous estimates should not be interpreted as representing time trends. In addition, when interpreting changes in MMRatios over time, one should take into consideration that it is easier to reduce the MMRatio when the level is high than when the MMRatio level is already low.<br /> <br /> Please note that Maternal Mortality Ratio is the number of women who die&nbsp; from pregnancy-related causes while pregnant or within 42 days of pregnancy termination per 100,000 live births.<br /> <br /> The key findings of the report entitled [inside]Trends in Maternal Mortality 2000 to 2017: Estimates by WHO, UNICEF, World Bank Group, UNFPA and the United Nations Population Division (released in September 2019)[/inside] are as follows (please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Maternal%20mortality%20Levels%20and%20trends%202000%20to%202017%20Executive%20Summary.pdf" title="Maternal mortality Levels and trends 2000 to 2017 Executive Summary">click here</a> and <a href="https://www.unfpa.org/featured-publication/trends-maternal-mortality-2000-2017">click here</a> to access):&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; Nigeria and India had the highest estimated numbers of maternal deaths, accounting for approximately one-third (35 percent) of estimated&nbsp; global maternal deaths in 2017, with approximately 67,000 and 35,000 maternal deaths (23 percent and 12 percent of global maternal deaths), respectively.<br /> <br /> &bull; Maternal Mortality Ratio for India was 370 in 2000, 286 in 2005, 210 in&nbsp; 2010, 158 in 2015 and 145 in 2017. So, the MMRatio for the country reduced by almost 61 percent between 2000 and 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; MMRatio for China was 59 in 2000, 44 in 2005, 36 in 2010, 30 in 2015 and 29 in 2017. Hence, the MMRatio for China reduced by around 51 percent between 2000 and 2017.&nbsp;&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; The absolute difference in MMRatio between India and China has lessened from 311 in 2000 to 116 in 2017. The country&#39;s MMRatio&nbsp; was 6.3 times that of China in 2000, which has reduced to 5 times in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; MMRatio for Bangladesh was 434 in 2000, 343 in 2005, 258 in 2010, 200 in 2015 and 173 in 2017. Therefore, the MMRatio for Bangladesh decreased by nearly 60 percent between 2000 and 2017.&nbsp;&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; The absolute gap in MMRatio between Bangladesh and India has reduced from 64 in 2000 to 28 in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; MMRatio for Sri Lanka was 56 in 2000, 45 in 2005, 38 in 2010, 36 in 2015 and 36 in 2017. So, the MMRatio for Sri Lanka reduced by roughly 36 percent between 2000 and 2017.&nbsp;&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; MMRatio for Pakistan was 286 in 2000, 237 in 2005, 191 in 2010, 154 in 2015 and 140 in 2017. Therefore, the MMRatio for Pakistan declined by roughly 51 percent between 2000 and 2017.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; MMRatio for South Asia was 395 in 2000, 309 in 2005, 235 in 2010, 179 in 2015 and 163 in 2017. Hence, the MMRatio for South Asia reduced by around 59 percent between 2000 and 2017.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Sub-Saharan Africa and Southern Asia accounted for approximately 86 percent (2,54,000) of the estimated global maternal deaths in 2017 with sub-Saharan Africa alone accounting for roughly 66 percent (1,96,000), while Southern Asia accounted for nearly 20 percent (58,000). South-Eastern Asia, in addition, accounted for over 5 percent of global maternal deaths (16,000).<br /> &nbsp;&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to the [inside]National Health Profile 2018, 13th Issue[/inside], Central Bureau of Health Intelligence, Ministry of Health &amp; Family Welfare (please <a href="https://im4change.org/docs/900National%20Health%20Profile%202018%2013th%20Issue%20Central%20Bureau%20of%20Health%20Intelligence%20Ministry%20of%20Health%20&amp;%20Family%20Welfare.pdf">click here</a> to access):<br /> <br /> <strong>Demographic Indicators</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; The Infant Mortality Rate (IMR) per 1,000 live births has declined considerably from 74 infant deaths in 1994 to 34 infant deaths in 2016. There is a huge gap between IMR in rural areas (38 infant deaths per 1,000 live births) and urban areas (23 infant deaths per 1000 live births).<br /> <br /> &bull; Among the states, the lowest IMR per 1,000 live births in 2016 was found in Goa (8), followed by Kerala (10) and Manipur (11). The highest IMR per 1,000 live births in 2015 was found in Madhya Pradesh (47), followed by both Assam and Odisha (44 each).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The life expectancy of life at birth has increased from 49.7 years in 1970-75 to 68.3 years in 2011-15. In the period 2011-15, the life expectancy for females was 70.0 years and 66.9 years for males.<br /> <br /> &bull; In the period 2011-15, the life expectancy in the rural areas was 67.1 years and in the urban areas it was 71.9 years.<br /> <br /> &bull; The Maternal Mortality Ratio (MMRatio) per 1,00,000 livebirths has decreased from 178 maternal deaths during 2010-12 to 167 maternal deaths during 2011-13. In 2011-13, the MMRatio per 1,00,000 livebirths was the highest in Assam i.e. 300 maternal deaths and lowest in Kerala i.e. 61 maternal deaths.<br /> <br /> &bull; The country&#39;s birth rate per 1,000 estimated mid-year population has fallen from 29.5 livebirths in 1991 to 20.4 livebirths in 2016. Birth rate per 1,000 estimated mid-year population in rural areas was 22.1 livebirths and in urban areas it was 17.0 livebirths in 2016.<br /> <br /> &bull; India&#39;s natural growth rate per 1,000 mid-year population has declined from 19.7 in 1991 to 14.0 in 2016.<br /> <br /> &bull; The proportion of urban population to India&#39;s total population has increased from 25.7 percent in 1991 to 27.81 percent in 2001, and further increased to 31.14 in 2011.<br /> <br /> &bull; The country&#39;s population density has increased from 267 persons per square kilometer in 1991 to 325 persons per square kilometer in 2001, and further rose to 382 persons per square kilometer in 2011.<br /> <br /> &bull; The decadal growth rate of India&#39;s population has fallen from 23.87 percent in 1981-1991 to 21.54 percent in 1991-2001, and further declined to 17.7 percent in 2001-2011.<br /> <br /> <strong>Health Status Indicators</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; In 2017, maximum number of malaria cases was reported in Odisha (3,52,140 cases) and maximum number of deaths was reported in West Bengal (29 deaths).<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of cases of malaria has changed from 8,81,730 in 2013 to 8,42,095 in 2017. The total number of deaths due to malaria has changed from 440 in 2013 to 104 in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; Out of the overall cases of Kala-azar reported in 2017, 72 percent of the cases were reported in Bihar. The total number of cases of Kala-azar has fallen from 13,869 in 2013 to 5,758 in 2017. Likewise, the total number of deaths from Kala-azar has fallen from 20 in 2013 to zero in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; There has been a considerable fall in the number of swine flu cases/ deaths in the year 2014 (viz. 937) as compared with 2012 (viz. 5,044) &amp; 2013 (viz. 5,253). However, the number of cases (42,592) and deaths (2,990) have drastically increased in the year 2015. In 2016, the cases decreased to 1786 and again increased to 38,811 in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; A total of 63,679 cases of chikungunya were reported in 2017 as compared with 64,057 cases in 2016. Most chikungunya cases in 2017 were reported from Karnataka (32,170), followed by Gujarat (7,807) and Maharashtra (7,639).<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of cases and deaths due to chicken pox were 74,035 and 92, respectively in 2017. Kerala accounted for maximum number of cases (30,941) and West Bengal accounted for maximum number of deaths (53) due to chicken pox in 2017.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of cases of Acute Encephalitis Syndrome has increased from 7,825 in 2013 to 13,036 in 2017. The total number of deaths due to Acute Encephalitis Syndrome has decreased from 1,273 in 2013 to 1,010 in 2017. Uttar Pradesh reported maximum numbers of cases (4,749) and maximum number of deaths (593) in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of cases of Japanese Encephalitis has almost doubled from 1,086 in 2013 to 2,180 in 2017. The total number of deaths due to Japanese Encephalitis has increased from 202 in 2013 to 252 in 2017. Uttar Pradesh reported maximum numbers of cases (693) and maximum number of deaths (93) in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of cases and deaths due to encephalitis were 12,485 and 626, respectively in 2017. Assam accounted for maximum number of cases (5,525) and Uttar Pradesh accounted for maximum number of deaths (246) due to chicken pox in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of cases and deaths due to viral meningitis were 7,559 and 121, respectively in 2017. Andhra Pradesh accounted for maximum number of cases (1,493) and maximum number of deaths (33) due to viral meningitis in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of cases of dengue has almost doubled from 75,808 in 2013 to 1,57,996 in 2017. The total number of deaths due to dengue has increased from 193 in 2013 to 253 in 2017. Tamil Nadu reported maximum numbers of cases (23,294) and maximum number of deaths (65) in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; As per the National Programme for Prevention and Control of Cancer, Diabetes, Cardiovascular Diseases and Stroke (NPCDCS), out of 3,57,23,660 patients who attended non-communicable disease (NCD) clinics in 2017, 8.41 percent people are diagnosed with diabetes, 10.22 percent are diagnosed with hypertension (high blood pressure), 0.37% are diagnosed with cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), 0.13 percent are diagnosed with stroke and 0.11 percent are diagnosed with common cancers (including oral, cervical and breast cancer).<br /> <br /> &bull; During the year 2015, the lives of 4,13,457 and 1,33,623 people are cut short as a result of accidental and suicide cases, respectively. Many more people suffer non-fatal injuries, with many incurring a disability as a result of their injury.<br /> <br /> &bull; Suicide rates are increasing significantly for young adults including male, female &amp; transgender in a wider population. The maximum number of suicide cases (44,593) is reported between the age-group 30-45 years.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of disabled persons in India is 26,814,994 as per the Census 2011.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of cases and deaths due to snake bite were 1,42,366 and 948 respectively in 2017.<br /> <br /> <strong>Health Financing in India</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; The total public expenditure on health for the year 2015-16 stood at Rs 1.4 lakh crores (actual).<br /> <br /> &bull; The per capita public expenditure (actual) on health in nominal terms has gone up from Rs. 621 in 2009-10 to Rs. 1,112 in 2015-16.<br /> <br /> &bull; Public expenditure on health (includes health sector expenditure by Centre and States/UTs) as a percentage of GDP was 1.02 percent in 2015-16. There is no significant change in public expenditure on health as a percentage of GDP since 2009-10.<br /> <br /> &bull; The Centre-State share in total public expenditure on health was 31:69 in 2015-16, which used to be 36:64 in 2009-10.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total public expenditure on health (excluding other Central Ministries) in 2015-16 was Rs. 1,40,054 crores, with Medical and Public Health comprising the major share (78.7 percent). The share of Family Welfare was 12.6 percent.<br /> <br /> &bull; Urban and rural health services constituted 71 percent of the public expenditure on medical and public health in 2015-16.<br /> <br /> &bull; The North-Eastern states had the highest (viz. Rs. 2,878 per capita) and Empowered Action Group (EAG) states (including Assam) had the lowest (viz. Rs. 871 per capita) average per capita public expenditure on health in 2015-16 (excluding UTs). For example, in Mizoram the per capita health expenditure was Rs. 5862 (actual) in 2015-16. However, in Bihar, the per capita health expenditure was Rs. 491 (actual) in 2015-16.<br /> <br /> &bull; The North-Eastern states had the highest public health expenditure as a percentage of Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP) in 2015-16 (2.76 percent). Public health expenditure as a percentage of GSDP stood at 1.36 percent for EAG states (including Assam) and 0.76 percent for major non-EAG states.<br /> <br /> &bull; Based on the Health Survey (71st round) conducted by National Sample Service Office (NSSO), the average medical expenditure incurred during stay at hospital between January, 2013 and June, 2014 was Rs. 14,935 for rural and Rs. 24,436 for urban India.<br /> <br /> &bull; The average total medical expenditure per child birth as in-patient over the last 365 days (survey conducted from January to June 2014) in a public hospital in rural areas was Rs. 1,587 and in urban areas is Rs. 2,117.<br /> <br /> &bull; Around 43 crore individuals were covered under any health insurance in the year 2016-17. This amounts to 34 percent of the total population of India. Almost 79 percent of them were covered by public insurance companies.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; Overall, 77 percent of all persons covered with insurance fall under Government-sponsored schemes.<br /> <br /> &bull; Public insurance companies had a higher share of coverage and premium for all types of health insurance policies, except family floater policies including individual policies.<br /> <br /> &bull; Compared to countries that have either Universal Health Coverage or moving towards it, India&rsquo;s per capita public spending on health is low.<br /> <br /> <strong>Human Resources in Health Sector</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; The number of registered allopathic doctors possessing recognized medical qualifications (under Indian Medical Council Act) and registered with state medical council for the years 2016 and 2017 were 25,282 and 17,982, respectively. Upto 2017, the total number of doctors possessing recognised medical qualifications (under the IMC Act) registered with the State Medical Councils/ Medical Council of India is 10,41,395.&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; In 2017, the average population served per government allopathic doctor was 11,082. The state having the highest average population served per government allopathic doctor in 2017 was Bihar (28,391), followed by Uttar Pradesh (19,962) and Jharkhand (18,518).&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; In 2017, the average population served per government dental surgeon was 1,76,004. The state having the highest average population served per government dental surgeon in 2017 was Chhattisgarh (25,87,900), followed by Maharashtra (14,83,150) and Uttar Pradesh (11,41,869).<br /> <br /> &bull; The number of dental surgeon registered with Central/ State Dental Councils of India has increased from 93,332 in 2008 to 2,51,207 as on 31st December, 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; Over the years with gaining popularity, there is a steady rise in total number of registered AYUSH doctors in India from 7,71,468 in 2016 to 7,73,668 in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; There was a total of 8,41,279 Auxilliary Nurse Midwives (ANMs) serving in the country as on 31st December, 2016.<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 31st December, 2016, the highest number of registered ANMs among the states were found in Andhra Pradesh (1,38,435), followed by Rajasthan (1,08,688) and Odisha (62,159).<br /> <br /> &bull; There are 19,80,536 Registered Nurses and Registered Midwives (RN &amp; RM) and 56,367 Lady Health Visitors (LHV) serving in the country as on 31st December, 2016.<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 31st December, 2016, the highest number of registered RN &amp; RM among the states were found in Tamil Nadu (2,62,718), followed by Kerala (2,46,161) and Andhra Pradesh (2,32,621).<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 13th November, 2017, the total number of registered pharmacists operating in the country is 9,07,132.<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 13th November, 2017, the highest number of registered pharmacists among the states were found in Maharashtra (2,03,089), followed by Gujarat (1,19,445) and Andhra Pradesh (1,15,754).<br /> <br /> &bull; In rural areas, the total number of allopathic doctors at primary health centres (PHCs) was 27,124 as on 31st March, 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 31st March, 2017, among the states, the highest number of allopathic doctors at PHCs was found in Maharashtra (2,929), followed by Tamil Nadu (2,759) and Rajasthan (2,382).<br /> <br /> &bull; In rural areas, the total number of specialists at community health centres (CHCs) is 4,156 as on 31st March, 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 31st March, 2017, among the states, the highest number of specialists at CHCs is found in Maharashtra (508), followed by Karnataka (498) and Rajasthan (497).<br /> <br /> <strong>Health Infrastructure</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; Medical education infrastructures in the country have shown rapid growth during the last 26 years. The country has 476 medical colleges, 313 dental colleges for Bachelor of Dental Surgery (BDS) &amp; 249 dental colleges for Master of Dental Surgery (MDS). There has been a total admission of 52,646 in 476 Medical Colleges and 27,060 in BDS and 6,233 in MDS during 2017-18.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of dental colleges for BDS has increased from 77 in 1994-95 to 313 in 2017-18 viz. by 4.1 times. The total number of dental colleges for MDS has increased from 32 in 1994-95 to 249 in 2017-18 viz. by 7.8 times.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of admission in dental colleges for BDS has risen from 1,987 in 1994-95 to 27,060 in 2017-18 viz. by 13.6 times. The total number of admission in dental colleges for MDS has risen from 225 in 1994-95 to 6,233 in 2017-18 viz. 27.7 times.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of medical colleges in India has increased from 146 in 1991-92 to 476 in 2017-18 viz. by 3.3 times.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of male students taking admissions in medical colleges has gone up from 7,468 in 1991-92 to 26,082 in 2017-18 viz. by 3.5 times. The total number of female students taking admissions in medical colleges has gone up from 4,731 in 1991-92 to 26,564 in 2017-18 viz. by 5.6 times.<br /> <br /> &bull; India has 3,215 institutions producing 1,29,926 General Nurse Midwives annually and 777 colleges for Pharmacy (Diploma) with an intake capacity of 46,795 as on 31st October, 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; There are 23,582 government hospitals having 7,10,761 beds in the country. It means that there is just one bed for 1,826 Indians in government hospitals, assuming that the projected population in 2018 being 129,80,41,000 as on 1st March, 2018.<br /> <br /> &bull; Around 19,810 government hospitals are in rural areas with 2,79,588 beds and 3,772 government hospitals are in urban areas with 4,31,173 beds.<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 31st March, 2017, there were 1,56,231 sub-centres, 25,650 primary health centres (PHCs) and 5,624 community health centres (CHCs).<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 31st March, 2017, most sub-centres were found in Uttar Pradesh (20,521), followed by Rajasthan (14,406) and Maharashtra (10,580).&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 31st March, 2017, most PHCs were found in Uttar Pradesh (3,621), followed by Karnataka (2,359) and Rajasthan (2,079).&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 31st March, 2017, most CHCs were found in Uttar Pradesh (822), followed by Rajasthan (579) and Tamil Nadu (385).<br /> <br /> &bull; Medical care facilities under AYUSH by management status i.e. dispensaries &amp; hospitals were 27,698 and 3,943 respectively, as on 1st April, 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of licensed blood banks in the country till June, 2017 was 2,903. The highest number of blood banks are found in Maharashtra (328), followed by Uttar Pradesh (294) and Tamil Nadu (291).&nbsp;&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; In total, there were 469 eye banks (362 privately run and 107 government run) in the country as on 4th January, 2018. Most eye banks were found in Maharashtra (166), followed by Karnataka (39) and Madhya Pradesh (36).<br /> <br /> <strong>Achievement of health-related SDGs targets</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; On most targets pertaining to health-related Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), India lags behind the target. For example, although the target for coverage of essential health services is 100 percent (indicator no. 3.8.1), in our country only 57 percent of the population is covered by such services. Similarly, although the target for Maternal Mortality Ratio (per 1,00,000 live births) is 70 by 2030 (indicator no. 3.1.1), MMRatio in India presently is 174.<br /> <br /> &bull; The target for Under-five mortality rate (per 1000 live births) is 25 by 2030 (indicator no. 3.2.1). However, U5MR in the country is 47.7.<br /> <br /> &bull; In case of many SDG-related indicators such as Suicide mortality rate (per 100,000 population) (indicator no. 3.4.2) or say Adolescent birth rate (per 1000 women aged 15-19 years) (indicator no. 3.7.2), the SDG target is yet to be determined.<br /> <br /> &bull; For many SDG-related indicators such as Hepatitis B incidence (indicator no. 3.3.4) or say Proportion of the population with access to affordable medicines and vaccines on a sustainable basis (indicator no. 3.b.1), the data for India is either not provided or remain unavailable.<br /> <br /> <strong>Table: Current Status of Health-related Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Target - Indian Scenario</strong><br /> <br /> <img alt="SDGs" src="tinymce/uploaded/SDGs_1.jpg" style="height:242px; width:334px" /><br /> <br /> <em><strong>Source:</strong> Monitoring Health in the Sustainable Development Goals: 2017, World Health Organization, Regional Office for South East Asia, as quoted in the National Health Profile 2018, please <a href="https://bit.ly/2MmfuuK">click here</a> to access, page no. 288<br /> <br /> Report of the Inter-Agency and Expert Group on Sustainable Development Goal Indicators (E/CN.3/2016/2/Rev.1), please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Final%20list%20of%20SDG%20indicators.pdf">click here</a> to access </em><br /> <br /> <br /> &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">While state-level trends for some important health indicators have been available in India, a comprehensive assessment of the diseases causing the most premature deaths and disability in each state, the risk factors responsible for this burden, and their time trends have not been available in a single standardised framework. The India State-level Disease Burden Initiative was launched in October 2015 to address this crucial knowledge gap with support from the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare of the Government of India. This is a collaborative effort between the Indian Council of Medical Research, Public Health Foundation of India, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, and experts and stakeholders from about 100 institutions across India. The work of this Initiative is overseen by an Advisory Board consisting of eminent policymakers and involves extensive engagement of 14 domain expert groups with the estimation process. Based on intense work over two years, this report describes the distribution and trends of diseases and risk factors for every state of India from 1990 to 2016.<br /> <br /> The estimates were produced as part of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. The analytical methods of this study have been standardised over two decades of scientific work, which has been reported in over 16,000 peer-reviewed publications, making it the most widely used approach globally for disease burden estimation. These methods enable standardised comparisons of health loss caused by different diseases and risk factors, between geographic units, sexes, and age groups, and over time in a unified framework. The key metric used for this comparison is disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), which is the sum of the number of years of life lost due to premature death and a weighted measure of the years lived with disability due to a disease or injury. The use of DALYs to track disease burden is recommended by India&rsquo;s National Health Policy of 2017.<br /> <br /> It is to be noted that attributable burden is the share of the burden of a disease that can be estimated to occur due to exposure to a particular risk factor.<br /> <br /> According to the report entitled [inside]India: Health of the Nation&rsquo;s States - The India State-Level Disease Burden Initiative, Disease Burden Trends in the States of India 1990 to 2016 (released in October, 2017) [/inside], prepared by Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), Public Health Foundation of India (PHFI), Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) and Ministry of Health &amp; Family Welfare (MoHFW), please <a href="https://im4change.org/docs/11592India_Health_of.pdf">click here</a> to access:<br /> <br /> <em>Health status improving, but major inequalities between states</em><br /> <br /> &bull; Life expectancy at birth improved in India from 59.7 years in 1990 to 70.3 years in 2016 for females, and from 58.3 years to 66.9 years for males. There were, however, continuing inequalities between states, with a range of 66.8 years in Uttar Pradesh to 78.7 years in Kerala for females, and from 63.6 years in Assam to 73.8 years in Kerala for males in 2016.<br /> <br /> &bull; The per person disease burden measured as DALYs rate dropped by 36 percent from 1990 to 2016 in India, after adjusting for the changes in the population age structure during this period. But there was an almost two-fold difference in this disease burden rate between the states in 2016, with Assam, Uttar Pradesh, and Chhattisgarh having the highest rates, and Kerala and Goa the lowest rates.<br /> <br /> &bull; While the disease burden rate in India has improved since 1990, it was 72 percent higher per person than in Sri Lanka or China in 2016.<br /> <br /> &bull; The under-5 mortality rate has reduced substantially from 1990 in all states, but there was a four-fold difference in this rate between the highest in Assam and Uttar Pradesh as compared with the lowest in Kerala in 2016, highlighting the vast health inequalities between the states.<br /> <br /> <em>Large differences between states in the changing disease profile</em><br /> <br /> &bull; Of the total disease burden in India measured as DALYs, 61 percent was due to communicable, maternal, neonatal, and nutritional diseases (termed infectious and associated diseases in this summary for simplicity) in 1990, which dropped to 33 percent in 2016.<br /> <br /> &bull; There was a corresponding increase in the contribution of non-communicable diseases from 30 percent of the total disease burden in 1990 to 55 percent in 2016, and of injuries from 9 percent to 12 percent.<br /> <br /> &bull; Infectious and associated diseases made up the majority of disease burden in most of the states in 1990, but this was less than half in all states in 2016. However, the year when infectious and associated diseases transitioned to less than half of the total disease burden ranged from 1986 to 2010 for the various state groups in different stages of this transition.<br /> <br /> &bull; The wide variations between the states in this epidemiological transition are reflected in the range of the contribution of major disease groups to the total disease burden in 2016: 48 percent to 75 percent for non-communicable diseases, 14 percent to 43 percent for infectious and associated diseases, and 9 percent to 14 percent for injuries. Kerala, Goa, and Tamil Nadu have the largest dominance of non-communicable diseases and injuries over infectious and associated diseases, whereas this dominance is present but relatively the lowest in Bihar, Jharkhand, Uttar Pradesh, and Rajasthan.<br /> <br /> &bull; It is to be noted that epidemiological transition level (ETL) is based on the ratio of the number of DALYs in a population due to communicable, maternal, neonatal, and nutritional diseases to the number of DALYs due to non-communicable diseases and injuries together. A decreasing ratio indicates advancing epidemiological transition with an increasing relative burden from non-communicable diseases as compared with communicable, maternal, neonatal, and nutritional diseases.<br /> <br /> &bull; The major EAG states of Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh both have a relatively lower level of development indicators and are at a similar less advanced epidemiological transition stage. However, Uttar Pradesh had 50 percent higher disease burden per person from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 54 percent higher burden from tuberculosis, and 30 percent higher burden from diarrhoeal diseases, whereas Madhya Pradesh had 76% higher disease burden per person from stroke. The cardiovascular risks were generally higher in Madhya Pradesh, and the unsafe water and sanitation risk was relatively higher in Uttar Pradesh.<br /> <br /> &bull; The two North-East India states of Manipur and Tripura are both at a lower-middle stage of epidemiological transition but have quite different disease burden rates from specific leading diseases. Tripura had 49% higher per person burden from ischaemic heart disease, 52 percent higher from stroke, 64 percent higher from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 159 percent higher from iron-deficiency anaemia, 59 percent higher from lower respiratory infections, and 56 percent higher from neonatal disorders. Manipur, on the other hand, had 88 percent higher per person burden from tuberculosis and 38 percent higher from road injuries. Regarding the level of risks, child and maternal malnutrition, air pollution, and several of the cardiovascular risks were higher in Tripura.<br /> <br /> &bull; The two adjoining north Indian states of Himachal Pradesh and Punjab both have a relatively higher level of development indicators and are at a similar more advanced epidemiological transition stage. However, there were striking differences between them in the level of burden from specific leading diseases. Punjab had 157 percent higher per person burden from diabetes, 134 percent higher burden from ischaemic heart disease, 49 percent higher burden from stroke, and 56 percent higher burden from road injuries. On the other hand, Himachal Pradesh had 63 percent higher per person burden from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Consistent with these findings, Punjab had substantially higher levels of cardiovascular risks than Himachal Pradesh.<br /> <br /> <em>Rising burden of non-communicable diseases in all states</em><br /> <br /> &bull; The contribution of most of the major non-communicable disease groups to the total disease burden has increased all over India since 1990, including cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, chronic respiratory diseases, mental health and neurological disorders, cancers, musculoskeletal disorders, and chronic kidney disease.<br /> <br /> &bull; Among the leading non-communicable diseases, the largest disease burden or DALY rate increase from 1990 to 2016 was observed for diabetes, at 80 percent, and ischaemic heart disease, at 34 percent. In 2016, three of the five leading individual causes of disease burden in India were non-communicable, with ischaemic heart disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as the top two causes and stroke as the fifth leading cause.<br /> <br /> &bull; The range of disease burden or DALY rate among the states in 2016 was 9 fold for ischaemic heart disease, 4 fold for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and 6 fold for stroke, and 4 fold for diabetes across India. While ischaemic heart disease and diabetes generally had higher DALY rates in states that are at a more advanced epidemiological transition stage toward non-communicable diseases, the DALY rates of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were generally higher in the EAG states that are at a relatively less advanced epidemiological transition stage.<br /> <br /> &bull; The DALY rates of stroke varied across the states without any consistent pattern in relation to the stage of epidemiological transition. This variety of trends of the different major non-communicable diseases indicates that policy and health system interventions to tackle their increasing burden have to be informed by the specific trends in each state.<br /> <br /> <em>Infectious and associated diseases reducing, but still high in many states</em><br /> <br /> &bull; The burden of most infectious and associated diseases reduced in India from 1990 to 2016, but five of the ten individual leading causes of disease burden in India in 2016 still belonged to this group: diarrhoeal diseases, lower respiratory infections, iron-deficiency anaemia, preterm birth complications, and tuberculosis.<br /> <br /> &bull; The burden caused by these conditions generally continues to be much higher in the Empowered Action Group (EAG) and North-East state groups than in the other states, but there were notable variations between the states within these groups as well.<br /> <br /> &bull; One should noted that the Empowered Action Group (EAG) states is a group of eight states that receive special development effort attention from the Government of India, namely, Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Odisha, Rajasthan, Uttarakhand, and Uttar Pradesh.<br /> <br /> &bull; For India as whole, the disease burden or DALY rate for diarrhoeal diseases, iron-deficiency anaemia, and tuberculosis was 2.5 to 3.5 times higher than the average globally for other geographies at a similar level of development, indicating that this burden can be brought down substantially.<br /> <br /> <em>Increasing but variable burden of injuries among states</em><br /> <br /> &bull; The contribution of injuries to the total disease burden has increased in most states since 1990. The highest proportion of disease burden due to injuries is in young adults. Road injuries and self-harm, which includes suicides and non-fatal outcomes of self-harm, are the leading contributors to the injury burden in India.<br /> <br /> &bull; The range of disease burden or DALY rate varied 3 fold for road injuries and 6 fold for self-harm among the states of India in 2016.<br /> <br /> &bull; The burden due to road injuries was much higher in males than in females. The DALY rate for self-harm for India as a whole was 1.8 times higher than the average globally for other geographies at a similar level of development in 2016.<br /> <br /> <em>Rising risks for cardiovascular diseases and diabetes</em><br /> <br /> &bull; Of the total disease burden in India in 1990, a tenth was caused by a group of risks including unhealthy diet, high blood pressure, high blood sugar, high cholesterol, and overweight, which mainly contribute to ischaemic heart disease, stroke, and diabetes. The contribution of this group of risks increased massively to a quarter of the total disease burden in India in 2016.<br /> <br /> &bull; The combination of these risks was highest in Punjab, Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Andhra Pradesh, and Maharashtra in 2016, but importantly, the contribution of these risks has increased in every state of the country since 1990.<br /> <br /> &bull; The other significant contributor to cardiovascular diseases and diabetes, as well as to cancers and some other diseases, is tobacco use, which was responsible for 6% of the total disease burden in India in 2016. All of these risks are generally higher in males than in females.<br /> <br /> <em>Unacceptably high risk of child and maternal malnutrition</em><br /> <br /> &bull; While the disease burden due to child and maternal malnutrition has dropped in India substantially since 1990, this is still the single largest risk factor, responsible for 15% of the total disease burden in India in 2016. This burden is highest in the major EAG states and Assam, and is higher in females than in males.<br /> <br /> &bull; Child and maternal malnutrition contributes to disease burden mainly through increasing the risk of neonatal disorders, nutritional deficiencies, diarrhoeal diseases, lower respiratory infections, and other common infections.<br /> <br /> &bull; As a stark contrast, the disease burden due to child and maternal malnutrition in India was 12 times higher per person than in China in 2016. Kerala had the lowest burden due to this risk among the Indian states, but even this was 2.7 times higher per person than in China.<br /> <br /> <em>Unsafe water and sanitation improving, but not enough yet</em><br /> <br /> &bull; Unsafe water and sanitation was the second leading risk responsible for disease burden in India in 1990, but dropped to the seventh leading risk in 2016, contributing 5 percent of the total disease burden, mainly through diarrhoeal diseases and other infections.<br /> <br /> &bull; Risk factors means potentially modifiable causes of disease and injury.<br /> <br /> &bull; The burden due to this risk is also highest in several EAG states and Assam, and higher in females than in males. The improvement in exposure to this risk from 1990 to 2016 was least in the EAG states, indicating that higher focus is needed in these states for more rapid improvements.<br /> <br /> &bull; The per person disease burden due to unsafe water and sanitation was 40 times higher in India than in China in 2016.<br /> <br /> <em>Household air pollution improving, outdoor air pollution worsening</em><br /> <br /> &bull; The contribution of air pollution to disease burden remained high in India between 1990 and 2016, with levels of exposure among the highest in the world. It causes burden through a mix of non-communicable and infectious diseases, mainly cardiovascular diseases, chronic respiratory diseases, and lower respiratory infections.<br /> <br /> &bull; The burden of household air pollution decreased during the period 1990-2016 due to decreasing use of solid fuels for cooking, and that of outdoor air pollution increased due to a variety of pollutants from power production, industry, vehicles, construction, and waste burning.<br /> <br /> &bull; Household air pollution was responsible for 5 percent of the total disease burden in India in 2016, and outdoor air pollution for 6 percent. The burden due to household air pollution is highest in the EAG states, where its improvement since 1990 has also been the slowest. On the other hand, the burden due to outdoor air pollution is highest in a mix of northern states, including Haryana, Uttar Pradesh, Punjab, Rajasthan, Bihar, and West Bengal.<br /> &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> The report entitled National Health Accounts: Estimates for India 2014-15 (released in October, 2017) provides healthcare expenditures in India based on National Health Accounts Guidelines for India, 2016 (with refinements where required) that adhere to System of Health Accounts 2011 (SHA 2011), a global standard framework for producing health accounts. The NHA estimates for India is a result of an institutionalised process wherein, the boundaries, data sources, classification codes and estimation methodology have all been standardised in consultation with national and international experts under the guidance of NHA Expert Group for India.<br /> <br /> The NHA provides key indicators to understand financing of health system in the country and allows for comparison with other countries. The National Health Policy 2017 sets out several goals related to healthcare financing and emphasizes the need to track expenditures on health through a robust system of National Health Accounts. The production of annual NHA estimates builds a database for tracking trends in allocations for health by union/state governments and estimate the burden of out-of-pocket payments.<br /> <br /> The key findings of the report entitled [inside]National Health Accounts: Estimates for India 2014-15 (released in October, 2017)[/inside], which has been prepared by the National Health Accounts Technical Secretariat, National Health Systems Resource Centre and Ministry of Health and Family Welfare&nbsp; are as follows (please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/National%20Health%20Accounts%20Estimates%20Report%202014-15.pdf" title="National Health Accounts Estimates for India 2014-15">click here</a> to access):<br /> <br /> &bull; The Total Health Expenditure (THE) for India is estimated at Rs. 4,83,259 crores (3.89 percent of GDP and Rs. 3,826 per capita) for the year 2014-15. THE constitutes current and capital expenditures incurred by Government and Private Sources including External/Donor funds. Current Health Expenditure (CHE) is Rs. 4,51,286 crores (93.4 percent of THE) and capital expenditures is Rs. 31,973 crores (6.6 percent of THE).<br /> <br /> &bull; The Government Health Expenditure (GHE) including capital expenditure is Rs. 1,39,949 crores (29 percent of THE, 1.13 percent GDP and Rs. 1,108 per capita) for the year 2014-15. This amounts to about 3.94 percent of General Government Expenditure in 2014-15. Of the GHE, Union Government share is 37 percent and State Government share is 63 percent. Union Government Expenditure on National Health Mission is Rs. 20,199 crores, Defence Medical Services Rs. 6,695 crores, Railway Health Services is Rs. 2,111 crores, Central Government Health Scheme (CGHS) is Rs. 2,300 crores and Ex Servicemen Contributory Health Scheme (ECHS) is Rs. 2,243 crores.<br /> <br /> &bull; The Out-of-Pocket Expenditure (OOPE) on health by households is Rs. 3,02,425 crores (62.6 percent of THE, 2.4 percent of GDP, Rs. 2,394 per capita) for the year 2014-15. Private Health Insurance expenditure is Rs. 17,755 crores (3.7 percent of THE) for the year 2014-15.<br /> <br /> &bull; Of the Current Health Expenditure, Union Government share is Rs. 37,221 crores (8.2 percent) and the State Government&rsquo;s share Rs. 59,978 crores (13.3 percent). Local bodies&rsquo; share is Rs. 2,960 crores (0.7 percent), Households share (including insurance contributions) about Rs. 3,20,262 crores (71 percent, OOPE being 67 percent). Contribution by enterprises (including insurance contributions) is Rs. 20,069 crores (4.4 percent) and NGOs is Rs. 7,422 crores (1.6 percent). External/donor funding contributes to about Rs. 3,374 crores (0.7 percent).<br /> <br /> &bull; The Current Health Expenditure attributed to Government Hospitals is Rs. 64,685 crores (14.3 percent) and Private Hospitals Rs. 1, 16,943 (25.9 percent). Expenditures incurred on other Government Providers (including PHC, Dispensaries and Family Planning Centres) is Rs. 27,782 crores (6.2 percent), Other Private Providers (incl. private clinics) is Rs. 23,795 crores (5.3 percent), Providers of Patient Transport and Emergency Rescue is Rs. 20,627 crores (4.6 percent), Medical and Diagnostic laboratories is Rs. 21,058 crores (4.7 percent), Pharmacies is Rs. 1,30,451 crores (28.9 percent), Other Retailers is Rs. 559 crores (0.1 percent), Providers of Preventive care is Rs. 23,817 crores (5.3 percent), and Other Providers is Rs. 9,985 crores (2.2 percent). About Rs. 11,584 crores (2.6 percent) is attributed to Providers of Health System Administration and Financing.<br /> <br /> &bull; Current health expenditure attributed to Inpatient Curative Care is Rs. 1,58,334 crores (35.1 percent), Outpatient curative care is Rs. 73,059 crores (16.2 percent), Patient Transportation is Rs. 20,627 crores (4.6 percent), Laboratory and Imaging services is Rs. 21,058 crores (4.7 percent), Prescribed Medicines is Rs. 1,28,887 crores (28.6 percent), Over The Counter (OTC) Medicines is Rs. 1564 crores (0.3 percent), Therapeutic Appliances and Medical Goods is Rs. 559 crores (0.1 percent), Preventive Care is Rs. 30,420 crores (6.7 percent), and others is Rs. 5,194 crores (1.2 percent). About Rs. 11,584 crores (2.6 percent) is attributed to Governance and Health System Administration.<br /> <br /> &bull; Total Pharmaceutical Expenditure is 37.9 percent of CHE (includes prescribed medicines, over the counter drugs and those provided during an inpatient, outpatient or any other event involving a contact with health care provider). The Expenditure on Traditional, Complementary and Alternative Medicine (TCAM) is 16 percent of CHE.<br /> <br /> &bull; The Current Health Expenditure attributed to Primary Care is 45.1 percent, Secondary Care is 35.6 percent, Tertiary care is 15.6 percent and governance and supervision is 2.6 percent. When this is disaggregated; Government expenditure on Primary Care is 51.3 percent, Secondary Care is 21.9 percent and Tertiary Care is 14 percent. Private expenditure on Primary Care is 43.1 percent, Secondary Care is 39.9 percent and Tertiary Care is 16.1 percent.<br /> &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/National%20Health%20Policy%202017.pdf">click here</a> to access the [inside]National Health Policy 2017[/inside].</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> The National Health Profile provides the latest data on all major health sector-related indicators in a comprehensive manner. It gives information on 6 major sectors i.e. Demographic, Socio-economic, Health Status, Health Finance, Health Infrastructure and Human Resources.&nbsp;<br /> <br /> According to the [inside]National Health Profile 2015[/inside], produced by the Central Bureau of Health Intelligence, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, (please <a href="http://www.cbhidghs.nic.in/E-Book%20HTML-2015/index.html">click here</a> to access):<br /> <br /> <strong><em>Demographic indicators</em></strong><br /> <br /> &bull; Infant Mortality Rate has declined considerably (40 per 1000 live births in 2013), however differentials of rural (44) and urban (27) are still high.<br /> <br /> &bull; Maternal Mortality Ratio (per 1 lakh live births) is highest in Assam (300) and lowest in Kerala (61) in 2011-13.<br /> <br /> &bull; The life expectancy at birth has increased from 49.7 years in 1970-75 to 66.1 years in 2006-10. During 2006-10, the life expectancy for females has been 67.7 years and males has been 64.6 years.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; Among the states, sex ratio is least for Haryana (879) while among the UTs, Daman and Diu (618) lags behind. Kerala (1084) tops the list with maximum sex ratio.<br /> <br /> &bull; The Total Fertility Rate (TFR) for the country has been 2.3 in 2013. In rural areas it has been 2.5, and in urban areas it has been 1.8.<br /> <br /> <strong><em>Socio-economic indicators</em></strong><br /> <br /> &bull; Literacy rate stood at 73 percent in 2011. Literacy rate among females has been 64.6 percent and males has been 80.9 percent. Literacy rate in urban areas (84.1 percent) has been more as compared to the same in rural areas (67.8 percent). Literacy rate has been highest in Kerala (94 percent)<br /> <br /> &bull; The percentage of population below the poverty line (as per Tendulkar methodology) has been 21.9 percent in 2011-12. The percentage of population below the poverty line in rural areas has been 25.7 percent and in urban areas has been 13.7 percent.<br /> <br /> &bull; The per capita Net National Income at current prices increased almost 3 times from Rs. 24,143 in 2004-05 to Rs. 74,920 in 2013-14.<br /> <br /> &bull; The per capita per day net availability of cereals has increased from 386.2 gm in 2001 to 468.9 gm in 2013. Similarly, the per capita per day net availability of pulses has increased from 30 gm in 2001 to 41.9 gm in 2013.<br /> <br /> &bull; Slum population in India is projected to increase from 9.30 crore in 2011 to 10.47 crore in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; Of the total 1.34 crore residences in slums, nearly 58.5 percent are in good condition, 37.4 percent are in livable condition and 4.1 percent are in dilapidated condition.&nbsp;<br /> <br /> <strong><em>Health status </em></strong><br /> <br /> &bull; Based on available evidence, cardiovascular disease (24 percent), chronic respiratory disease (11 percent), cancer (6 percent) and diabetes (2 percent) are the leading cause of mortality in India.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of dengue cases in India has grown from 28,292 in 2010 to 40,425 in 2014. The total number of dengue related deaths stood at 131 in 2014.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of Japanese Encephalitis cases in India has grown from 555 in 2010 to 1,652 in 2014. The total number of Japanese Encephalitis related deaths stood at 292 in 2014.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of malaria cases in India has grown from nearly 16 lakh in 2010 to 10.71 lakh in 2014. The total number of malaria related deaths stood at 535 in 2014.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of Chikungunya fever cases in India has reduced from 48,176 in 2010 to 15,445 in 2014.&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; Nearly 47 percent of deliveries in India during 2012-13 were institutional whereas 52.3 percent deliveries took place at home.&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; Nearly 40.5 percent of children under 3 years of age were breastfed within an hour of birth in 2012-13.&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; At the national level, nearly 54 percent of children aged 12-23 months received full vaccination during 2012-13.<br /> <br /> &bull; The incidence of infanticide was 82 and foeticide was 210 in 2012.<br /> <br /> <strong><em>Health finance</em></strong><br /> <br /> &bull; Per capita public expenditure on health in nominal terms has gone up from Rs. 621 in 2009-10 to Rs. 1280 in 2014-15.<br /> <br /> &bull; Public expenditure on health as a percentage of GDP has gone up from 1.12 percent in 2009-10 to 1.26 percent in 2014-15.<br /> <br /> &bull; The Centre-state share in total public expenditure on health has changed from 36:64 in 2009-10 to 30:70 in 2014-15.<br /> <br /> &bull; Out-of-pocket (OOP) medical expenditure incurred during 2011-12 has been Rs. 146 per capita per month for urban India and Rs. 95 for rural India.<br /> <br /> &bull; Over 60 percent of total OOP health expenditure is on medicines, both in rural and urban India in 2011-12.<br /> <br /> &bull; As a share of total consumption expenditure, OOP expenditure on health has been 6.7 percent in rural India and 5.5 percent in urban India in 2011-12.<br /> <br /> &bull; Per capita OOP expenditure as well as the share of OOP in total consumption expenditure was positively correlated with consumption expenditure fractiles; higher fractiles had higher levels of both per capita OOP and share of OOP in consumption expenditure in 2011-12.<br /> <br /> &bull; Among all the states, Kerala had the highest per capita OOP medical expenditure as well as its share in total consumption expenditure in 2011-12.<br /> <br /> &bull; Around 22 crore individuals were covered under any health insurance in 2013-14. This means 18 percent of the population has been covered under any health insurance.<br /> <br /> <strong><em>Human resources in health sector</em></strong><br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of doctors possessing recognized medical qualification (under the IMC Act), registered with state medical councils or Medical Council of India, stood at 15,976 in 2014.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of dental surgeons registered with the Central/ State Dental Councils of India stood at 1.54 lakhs in 2014, which was 21,720 in 1994.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of Government allopathic doctors stood at 1.06 lakhs and the total number of Government dental surgeons stood at 5,614.<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 31 December, 2014, the total number of Auxiliary Nurse Midwives (ANMs) stood at 7.86 lakh, whereas Registered Nurses &amp; Registered Midwives (RN &amp; RM) stood at 17.8 lakhs and Lady Health Visitors (LHV) stood at 55,914.<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 27 June, 2014, the total number of pharmacists stood at 6.64 lakh.<br /> <br /> <strong><em>Health infrastructure</em></strong><br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of licensed blood banks in India as on February 2015 is 2760.<br /> <br /> &bull; There are 20,306 hospitals having 6.76 lakh beds in India. There are 16,816 hospitals in rural areas having 1.84 lakh beds and 3,490 hospitals in urban areas having 4.92 lakh beds.<br /> <br /> &bull; The number of medical colleges in India has more than doubled from 146 in 1991-92 to 398 in 2014-15.<br /> &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> The 71st round National Sample Survey on &ldquo;Social Consumption: Health&rdquo; was conducted during January to June 2014. The information in the survey was collected from 36,480 households in rural areas and 29,452 households in urban areas during the 71st round.<br /> <br /> The key findings of the [inside]71st round NSS report: Key Indicators of Social Consumption in India Health (published in June 2015)[/inside] are as follows (please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/nss_71st_ki_health_30june15.pdf" title="NSS 71st Round Health">click here</a> to access the full report; please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/NSS%20Press%20Release%20Health.pdf" title="NSS Press Note Health">click here</a> to read the summary of findings):<br /> <br /> <em>A. Non-hospitalized treatment</em><br /> <br /> &bull; The Proportion (per 1000) of Ailing Persons (PAP), measured as the number of living persons reporting ailments (per 1000 persons), was 89 persons in rural India and 118 persons in urban India.<br /> <br /> &bull; Inclination towards allopathy treatment was prevalent (around 90% in both the sectors). Only 5 to 7 percent usage of &lsquo;other&rsquo; including AYUSH (Ayurveda, Yoga or Naturopathy Unani, Siddha and homoeopathy) was reported both in rural and urban area. Moreover, un-treated spell was higher in rural (both for male and female) than urban areas.<br /> <br /> &bull; Private doctors were the most important single source of treatment in both the sectors (Rural &amp; Urban). More than 70 percent (72 per cent in the rural areas and 79 per cent in the urban areas) spells of ailment were treated in the private sector (consisting of private doctors, nursing homes, private hospitals, charitable institutions, etc.).<br /> <br /> <em>B. Hospitalized treatment</em><br /> <br /> &bull; Medical treatment of an ailing person as an in-patient in any medical institution having provision for treating the sick as in-patients, was considered as hospitalised treatment. In the urban population, 4.4 percent persons were hospitalised at some time during a reference period of 365 days. The proportion of persons hospitalised in the rural areas was lower (3.5 percent).<br /> <br /> &bull; It is observed that in rural India, 42 percent hospitalised treatment was carried out in public hospital and rest 58 percent in private hospital. For the urban India, the corresponding figures were 32 percent and 68 percent. It may be noted in this context that households (or persons within households) were segregated in sector (rural/urban) by their place of domicile, and not by the place of treatment.<br /> <br /> &bull; Preference towards allopathy treatment was observed in cases of hospitalised treatment as well.<br /> <br /> <em>C. Cost of treatment - as in-patient and other</em><br /> <br /> &bull; Average medical expenditure per hospitalisation case: Higher amount was spent for treatment per hospitalised case by people in the private hospitals (Rs. 25850) than in the public hospitals (Rs. 6120). The highest expenditure was recorded for treatment of Cancer (Rs. 56712) followed by that for Cardio-vascular diseases (Rs. 31647).<br /> <br /> &bull; Average medical expenditure per non-hospitalisation case was Rs. 509 in rural India and Rs. 639 in urban India.<br /> <br /> &bull; As much as 86 percent of rural population and 82 percent of urban population were still not covered under any scheme of health expenditure support. Government, however, was able to bring about 12 percent urban and 13 percent rural population under health protection coverage through Rastriya Swasthya Bima Yojana (RSBY) or similar plan. Only 12 percent households of the 5th quintile class (Usual Monthly Per Capita Consumer Expenditure) of urban area had some arrangement of medical insurance from private provider.<br /> <br /> <em>D. Incidence of childbirth, Expenditure on institutional childbirth</em><br /> <br /> &bull; In rural area 9.6% women (age 15-49) were pregnant at any time during the reference period of 365 days; for urban this proportion was 6.8%. Evidence of interrelation of place of childbirth with level of living is noted both in rural and urban areas. In the rural areas, about 20% of the childbirths were at home or any other place other than the hospitals. The same for urban areas was 10.5%. Among the institutional childbirth, 55.5% took place in public hospital and 24% in private hospital in rural area. In urban area, however, the corresponding figures were 42% and 47.5% respectively.<br /> <br /> &bull; An average of Rs. 5544 was spent per childbirth (as inpatient) in rural area and Rs. 11685 in urban area. The rural population spent, on an average, Rs. 1587 for the same in a public sector hospital and Rs. 14778 for one in a private sector hospital. The corresponding figures for urban India were Rs. 2117 and Rs. 20328.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> The key findings of the [inside]Draft National Health Policy 2015 (published in December 2014)[/inside], prepared by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare are as follows (Please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Draft%20National%20Health%20Policy%202015.pdf" title="Draft NHP 2015">click here</a> to download):<br /> <br /> &bull; The draft National Health Policy accepts and endorses the understanding that a full achievement of the goals and principles as defined would require an increased public health expenditure to 4% to 5% of the GDP. However, given that the NHP, 2002 target of 2% was not met, and taking into account the financial capacity of the country to provide this amount and the institutional capacity to utilize the increased funding in an effective manner, the present draft health policy proposes a potentially achievable target of raising public health expenditure to 2.5% of the GDP. It also notes that 40% of this would need to come from Central expenditures. At current prices, a target of 2.5% of GDP translates to Rs. 3800 per capita, representing an almost four fold increase in five years.<br /> <br /> &bull; The private sector today provides nearly 80% of outpatient care and about 60% of inpatient care. (The out-patient estimate would be significantly lower if we included only qualified providers. By NSSO estimates as much as 40% of the private care is likely to be by informal unqualified providers). 72% of all private health care enterprises are own-account-enterprises (OAEs), which are household run businesses providing health services without hiring a worker on a fairly regular basis.<br /> <br /> &bull; In terms of comparative efficiency, public sector is value for money as it accounts (based on the NSSO 60th round) for less than 30% of total expenditure, but provides for about 20% of outpatient care and 40% of in-patient care. This same expenditure also pays for 60% of end-of-life care (RGI estimates on hospital mortality), and almost 100% of preventive and promotive care and a substantial part of medical and nursing education as well.<br /> <br /> &bull; Thailand has almost the same total health expenditure as India but its proportion of public health expenditure is 77.7% of total health expenditures (which is 3.2% of the GDP) and this is spent through a form of strategic purchasing in which about 95% is purchased from public health care facilities- which is what gives it such a high efficiency. Brazil spends 9% of its GDP on health but of this public health expenditure constitutes 4.1% of the GDP (which is 45.7% of total health expenditure). This public health expenditure accounts for almost 75% of all health care provision. It would be ambitious if India could aspire to a public health expenditure of 4% of the GDP, but most expert groups have estimated 2.5% as being more realistic.<br /> <br /> &bull; As costs of care rise, affordability, as distinct from equity, requires emphasis. Health care costs of a household exceeding 10% of its total monthly consumption expenditures or 40% of its non-food consumption expenditure- is designated catastrophic health expenditures- and is declared as an unacceptable level of health care costs.<br /> <br /> &bull; Almost all hospitalization even in public hospitals leads to catastrophic health expenditures, and over 63 million persons are faced with poverty every year due to health care costs alone. It is because there is no financial protection for the vast majority of health care needs. In 2011-12, the share of out-of-pocket expenditure on health care as a proportion of total household monthly per capita expenditure was 6.9% in rural areas and 5.5% in urban areas. This led to an increasing number of households facing catastrophic expenditures due to health costs (18% of all households in 2011-12 as compared to 15% in 2004-05). Under NRHM, free care in public hospitals was extended to a select set of conditions &ndash; for maternity, newborn and infant care as part of the Janani Suraksha Yojana and, the Janani Shishu Suraksha Karyakram, and for disease control programmes. For all other services, user fees especially for diagnostics and &ldquo;outside prescriptions&rdquo; for drugs continued. Also, due to the selective approach, several essential services especially for chronic illness was not obtainable or at best only available at overcrowded district and medical college hospitals resulting in physical and financial hardship and poor quality of care.<br /> <br /> &bull; The Central Government under the Ministry of Labour &amp; Employment, launched the Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana (RSBY) in 2008. The population coverage under these various schemes increased from almost 55 million people in 2003-04 to about 370 million in 2014 (almost one-fourth of the population). Nearly two thirds (180 million) of this population are those in the Below Poverty Line (BPL) category. Evaluations show that schemes such as the RSBY, have improved utilization of hospital services, especially in private sector and among the poorest 20% of households and SC/ST households. However there are other problems. One problem is low awareness among the beneficiaries about the entitlement and how and when to use the RSBY card. Another is related to denial of services by private hospitals for many categories of illnesses, and over supply of some services.<br /> <br /> &bull; The private health care industry is valued at $40 billion and is projected to grow to $ 280 billion by 2020 as per market sources. The current growth rate of this perennially and most rapidly growing area of the economy, the healthcare industry, at 14% is projected to be 21% in the next decade. Even during the global recession of 2008, this sector remained relatively recession-proof. The private health care industry is complex and differentiated. It includes insurance and equipment, which accounts for about 15%, pharmaceuticals which accounts for over 25%, about 10% on diagnostics and about 50% is hospitals and clinical care. The private sector growth cannot be seen merely as a consequence of limited public sector investment. The Government has had an active policy in the last 25 years of building a positive economic climate for the health care industry. Amongst these measures are lower direct taxes; higher depreciation in medical equipment; Income Tax exemptions for 5 years for rural hospitals; custom duty exemptions for imported equipment that are lifesaving; Income Tax exemption for Health Insurance; and active engagement through publicly financed health insurance which now covers almost 27% of the population.<br /> <br /> &bull; Maternal mortality now accounts for 0.55% of all deaths and 4% of all female deaths in the 15 to 49 year age group.<br /> <br /> &bull; India is set to reach the Millennium Development Goals (MDG) with respect to maternal and child survival. The MDG target for Maternal Mortality Ratio (MMR) is 140 per 100,000 live births. From a baseline of 560 in 1990, the nation had achieved 178 by 2010-12, and at this rate of decline is estimated to reach an MMR of 141 by 2015.<br /> <br /> &bull; In the case of under-5 mortality rate (U5MR), the MDG target is 42. From a baseline of 126 in 1990, in 2012 the nation has an U5MR of 52 and an extrapolation of this rate would bring it to 42 by 2015. This is particularly creditable on a global scale where in 1990 India&#39;s MMR and U5MR were 47% and 40% above the international average respectively.<br /> <br /> &bull; Although over 90% of pregnant women receive one antenatal check up and 87% received full TT immunization, only about 68.7% of women have received the mandatory three antenatal check-ups. Again whereas most women had received iron and folic acid tablets, only 31% of pregnant women had consumed more than 100 IFA tablets. For institutional delivery, standard protocols are often not followed during labour and the postpartum period. Sterilization related deaths a preventable tragedy, are often a direct consequence of poor quality of care. Only 61% of children (12-23 months) have been fully immunized.<br /> <br /> &bull; In AIDS control, progress has been good with a decline from a 0.41% prevalence rate in 2001 to 0.27% in 2011 but this still leaves about 21 lakh persons living with HIV, with about 1.16 lakh new cases and 1.48 deaths in 2011. In tuberculosis the challenge is a prevalence of close to 211 cases and 19 deaths per 100,000 population and rising problems of multi-drug resistant tuberculosis. Though these are significant declines from the MDG baseline, India still contributes to 24% of all global new case detection.<br /> <br /> &bull; Over 75% of communicable diseases are not part of existing national programmes. Overall, communicable diseases contribute to 24.4% of the entire disease burden while maternal and neonatal ailments contribute to 13.8%. Non-communicable diseases (39.1%) and injuries (11.8%) now constitute the bulk of the country&#39;s disease burden. National Health Programmes for non-communicable diseases are very limited in coverage and scope, except perhaps in the case of the Blindness control programme.<br /> <br /> &bull; The gap between service availability and needs is widest in the case of mental illness- 43 facilities in the nation with a 0.47 psychologists per million people.<br /> <br /> &bull; The elderly i.e. the population above 60 years comprise 8.6% of the population (103.8 million) and they are also a vulnerable section. Those above 75 years (20.52 million) are most vulnerable and almost 8% of the elderly population is bed ridden or homebound (NSSO).<br /> <br /> **page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The report entitled [inside]Economic Burden of Tobacco Related Diseases in India[/inside] (please&nbsp;<a href="tinymce/uploaded/economic_burden_of_tobacco_related_diseases_in_india_executive_summary.pdf" title="Economic Burden of tobacco related diseases">click here</a>&nbsp;to download the Executive Summary), supported by the Ministry of Health &amp; Family Welfare, Government of India and the WHO Country Office for India, was developed by the Public Health Foundation of India (PHFI).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The report estimates direct and indirect costs from all diseases caused due to tobacco use and four specific diseases namely, respiratory diseases, tuberculosis, cardiovascular diseases and cancers. The report also highlights that tobacco use and the associated costs are creating an enormous burden for the nation.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The total economic costs attributable to tobacco use from all diseases in India in the year 2011 for persons aged 35-69 amounted to Rs. 104500 crores of which 16 percent was direct cost and 84 percent was indirect cost.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to the report, massive direct medical costs of tobacco attributable diseases amount to Rs.16,800 crore and associated indirect morbidity cost of Rs. 14,700 crore. The cost from premature mortality is Rs. 73,000 crores, indicating a substantial productive loss to the nation, the report states.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to the United Nations&#39; report (released in May, 2014) entitled [inside]Trends in maternal mortality estimates 1990 to 2013[/inside], (please&nbsp;<a href="tinymce/uploaded/Trends%20in%20Maternal%20Mortality%201990%20to%202013.pdf" title="Trends in Maternal Mortality 1990 to 2013">click here</a>&nbsp;to download):&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em><strong>Indian scenario</strong></em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Maternal mortality ratio (MMR)* in India stood at 560 maternal deaths (per 100000 live births) during 1990, 460 during 1995, 370 during 2000, 280 during 2005 and 190 during 2013.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; As compared to India (MMR: 190 per 100000 live births), Brazil (MMR: 69) and China (MMR: 32) performed better in reducing maternal deaths.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; An Indian woman&rsquo;s lifetime risk of maternal death** &ndash; the probability that a 15 year old woman will eventually die from a maternal cause &ndash; is 1 in 190, whereas for a Chinese woman it is 1 in 1800 and for a Brazilian woman it is 1 in 780.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; At the country level, the two countries that accounted for one third of all global maternal deaths are India at 17 percent (50000) and Nigeria at 14 percent (40000).&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The proportion of deaths among women of reproductive age that are due to maternal causes (PM)*** in India is 6.7 percent whereas for China it is 1.6 percent and for Brazil it is 2.8 percent.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The ten countries that comprised 58 percent of the global maternal deaths reported in 2013 are: India (50000, 17%); Nigeria (40000, 14%); Democratic Republic of the Congo (21000, 7%); Ethiopia (13000, 4%); Indonesia (8800, 3%); Pakistan (7900, 3%); United Republic of Tanzania (7900, 3%); Kenya (6300, 2%); China (5900, 2%); Uganda (5900, 2%).&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; India could reduce MMR by 65 percent between 1990 and 2013.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The present report has classified India among 96 countries with incomplete civil registration and/or other types of maternal mortality data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em><strong>Global scenario</strong></em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Every day, approximately 800 women die from preventable causes related to pregnancy and childbirth.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Under MDG5, countries committed to reducing maternal mortality by three quarters between 1990 and 2015. Since 1990, maternal deaths worldwide have dropped by 45%. However, between 1990 and 2013, the global maternal mortality ratio (i.e. the number of maternal deaths per 100 000 live births) declined by only 2.6% per year. This is far from the annual decline of 5.5% required to achieve MDG5.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; 99 percent of all maternal deaths occur in developing countries. More than half of these deaths occur in sub-Saharan Africa and almost one third occur in South Asia.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The maternal mortality ratio in developing countries in 2013 is 230 per 100 000 live births versus 16 per 100 000 live births in developed countries.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; A woman&rsquo;s lifetime risk of maternal death &ndash; the probability that a 15 year old woman will eventually die from a maternal cause &ndash; is 1 in 3700 in developed countries, versus 1 in 160 in developing countries.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Maternal mortality is higher in women living in rural areas and among poorer communities.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Young adolescents face a higher risk of complications and death as a result of pregnancy than older women.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The major complications that account for 80% of all maternal deaths are: a. severe bleeding (mostly bleeding after childbirth); b. infections (usually after childbirth); c. high blood pressure during pregnancy (pre-eclampsia and eclampsia); and d. unsafe abortion. The remainder are caused by or associated with diseases such as malaria, and AIDS during pregnancy. Skilled care before, during and after childbirth can save the lives of women and newborn babies.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; While levels of antenatal care have increased in many parts of the world during the past decade, only 46 percent of women in low-income countries benefit from skilled care during childbirth.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Other factors that prevent women from receiving or seeking care during pregnancy and childbirth are: poverty, distance, lack of information, inadequate services and cultural practices.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Note:&nbsp;</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">* Maternal mortality ratio (MMR) is the number of maternal deaths during a given time period per 100000 live births during the same time period.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">** Adult lifetime risk of maternal death is the probability that a 15-year-old women will die eventually from a maternal cause.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">*** Proportion of deaths among women of reproductive age that are due to maternal causes (PM) is the number of maternal deaths in a given time period divided by the total deaths among women aged 15&ndash;49 years.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Rural%20Health%20Statistics%20of%20India%202012.pdf" title="Rural Health Statistics of India 2012">click here</a> to access the latest edition of [inside]Rural Health Statistics in India 2012[/inside] that was released by the Union health ministry. The report provides detailed statistics on rural health infrastructure on the basis of information available up to March, 2012 and data provided by the States and Union Territories.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> According to the UNICEF report titled [inside]Committing to Child Survival: A Promise Renewed Progress Report 2013[/inside] (please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/APR_Progress_Report_2013_9_Sept_2013_1.pdf" title="UNICEF child mortality report">click here</a> to download):<br /> <br /> <strong><em>Indian scenario</em></strong><br /> <br /> &bull; Under Five Mortality Rate (Probability of dying between birth and exactly 5 years of age, expressed per 1,000 live births) in India for the year 2012, stands at 56 and India&#39;s ranking in terms of U5MR is 49. In 2012, the neonatal mortality rate (Probability of dying in the first month of life, expressed per 1,000 live births) at national level is at 31. The share of neonatal deaths in under-five deaths stood at 55 percent in 2012 as compared to 41 percent in 1990.&nbsp;&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; U5MR in India declined by 55 percent from 126 in 1990 to 56 in 2012. Infant Mortality Rate (Probability of dying between birth and exactly 1 year of age, expressed per 1,000 live births) declined from 88 in 1990 to 44 in 2012. Neonatal mortality rate declined from 51 in 1990 to 31 in 2012.&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; U5MR in India among boys declined from 121 in 1990 to 54 in 2012. U5MR in India among girls declined from 130 in 1990 to 59 in 2012.<br /> <br /> &bull; In 2012, 21 percent deaths among Indian children under 5 years of age occurred due to pneumonia, 10 percent due to diarrhoea, 1 percent due to malaria, 3 percent due to measles and 43 percent due to neonatal causes.<br /> <br /> &bull; Half of all under-five deaths occur in just five countries: India (22%), Nigeria (13%), Pakistan, the Democratic Republic of the Congo (each 6%) and China (4%).<br /> <br /> &bull; Around two-thirds of neonatal deaths occur in just 10 countries, with India accounting for more than one-quarter and Nigeria for a tenth. More than 4 in 10 of all neonatal deaths worldwide occur in just three countries: India, Nigeria, and Pakistan.<br /> <br /> &bull; More than half of the under-five deaths caused by pneumonia or diarrhoea occur in just four countries: India, Nigeria, Pakistan and the Democratic Republic of the Congo.<br /> <br /> &bull; The Governments of Ethiopia, India and the United States, together with the UN agency, launched in 2012 &lsquo;Committing to Child Survival: A Promise Renewed&#39;, a global effort to accelerate efforts to stop young children from dying from preventable causes. Some 176 governments have signed on, including those making some of the greatest strides in under-five mortality.<br /> <br /> &bull; In February 2013, the Government of India, another cosponsor of the global Call to Action, convened a national forum of state policymakers, technical advisors, civil society organizations and private-sector partners to identify and commit to high-impact strategies that can accelerate the decline in preventable child deaths.<br /> <br /> <strong><em>Global scenario</em></strong><br /> <br /> &bull; In 2012, around 6.6 million children died globally before their fifth birthday, at a rate of around 18,000 per day. Since 1990, 216 million children have died before their fifth birthday &mdash; more than the current total population of Brazil, the world&rsquo;s fifth most populous country.<br /> <br /> &bull; Of the 6.6 million under-five deaths globally in 2012, most were from preventable causes such as pneumonia, diarrhoea or malaria; around 44% of deaths in children under 5 occurred during the neonatal period. Pneumonia and diarrhoea remain leading causes of deaths among children under 5, killing almost 5,000 children under 5 every day. Malaria remains an important cause of child death, killing 1,200 children under 5 every day.<br /> <br /> &bull; Global progress in reducing child deaths since 1990 has been very significant. The global rate of under-five mortality has roughly halved, from 90 deaths per 1,000 live births in 1990 to 48 per 1,000 in 2012. The estimated annual number of under-five deaths has fallen from 12.6 million to 6.6 million over the same period.<br /> <br /> &bull; Put another way, 17,000 fewer children die each day in 2012 than did in 1990 &mdash; thanks to more effective and affordable treatments, innovative ways of delivering critical interventions to the poor and excluded, and sustained political commitment. These and other vital child survival interventions have helped to save an estimated 90 million lives in the past 22 years.<br /> <br /> &bull; The global annual rate of reduction in under-five deaths has steadily accelerated since 1990-1995, when it stood at 1.2%, more than tripling to 3.9% in 2005-2012. Both sub-Saharan African regions&mdash;particularly Eastern and Southern Africa but also West and Central Africa&mdash;have seen a consistent acceleration in reducing under-five deaths, particularly since 2000.<br /> <br /> &bull; At the current rate of reduction in under-five mortality, the world will only make MDG 4 by 2028 &mdash; 13 years after the deadline &mdash; and 35 million more children will die between 2015 and 2028 whose lives could be saved if we were able to make the goal on time in 2015 and continue that trend.<br /> <br /> &bull; Accelerating progress in child survival urgently requires greater attention to ending preventable child deaths in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia, which together account for 4 out of 5 under-five deaths globally.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to the [inside]Pneumonia Progress Report, 2012[/inside], released by IVAC and John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012.pdf" title="Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012">click here</a> to access:</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The 2000-2010 decade brought a significant reduction in overall child mortality, from 9.6 to 7.6 million. Pneumonia continues to be the number one killer of children around the world-causing 18% of all child mortality, an estimated 1.3 million child deaths in 2011 alone.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Nearly 99 percent of all pneumonia deaths occur in developing countries, and three-quarters take place in just 15 countries. The majority of pneumonia cases are preventable or treatable.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Pneumonia is the leading cause of child mortality in India, responsible for the deaths of nearly 400,000 &nbsp;children under five in 2010.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Percentage of Indian children with suspected pneumonia receiving antibiotics stood at 13 percent in 2010.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Percentage of under-five Indian children with suspected pneumonia taken to appropriate health-care provider stood at 69 percent in 2010.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Percentage of children receiving exclusive breastfeeding in first 6 months of life is 46 percent (as per latest available data during 2006-2010).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Vaccine coverage in the case of DTP3 (third dose of diphtheria and tetanus toxoid and pertussis vaccine) is 72 percent and in the case of measles is 74 percent in 2011.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; India and Nigeria, two large countries with the highest numbers of child deaths worldwide, remain low scorers with an average intervention coverage (interventions in terms of vaccination, breastfeeding, access to care and antibiotic treatment) rate of 55% and 40%, respectively.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; One notable area of progress in India is on coverage of two vaccines that can help prevent pneumonia, Hib vaccine and measles vaccine. While Hib vaccine uptake has been slow in India&rsquo;s public sector, momentum is now shifting following efforts by the Ministry of Health &amp; Family Welfare (MOHFW), states, health experts and advocates to prioritize implementation of the National Technical Advisory Group on Immunization&rsquo;s (NTAGI) recommendation to add Hib to the Universal Immunization Programme (UIP).&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Two Indian states, Tamil Nadu and Kerala, introduced Hib vaccines (in the form of the pentavalent vaccine) in December 2011, and six more are slated to do so by the end of 2012. At a recent Hib Symposium in the state of Odisha, MOHFW officials stated that at least twice as many additional states have expressed interest in the vaccine.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; India has joined other WHO Member States in introducing a second dose of measles vaccine into the UIP to ensure its children are protected from the virus, which contributes to the burden of pneumonia. Measles was once one of the leading causes of death in children, but global measles deaths have declined dramatically because of widespread coverage with two doses of measles vaccine. India began a phased introduction of the second dose in 2010; by the end of the first year, the second dose of measles vaccine had been added to routine immunization in 21 states and catch-up campaigns were completed in 197 districts in 14 states.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to the report titled: [inside]Defeating malaria in Asia, the Pacific, Americas, Middle East and Europe, November, 2012[/inside], which has been produced by World Health Organization and PATH,&nbsp;<a href="http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Defeating%20malaria.pdf">http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Defeating%20malaria.pdf</a>: &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The Indian Commission on Macroeconomics and Health notes that, in India, 13 household person-days per patient were lost per episode of malaria. Furthermore, the commission estimated that the overall monetary losses to families (income losses together with treatment expenses) could amount to between 200 and 400 Indian rupees (US$ 3.5 to 7).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; With an estimated 22.5 million malaria cases in India, this translates to an annual cost of US$ 79 to 157 million, or 0.01% of gross domestic product each year.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In states with the highest incidence rates, such as Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Meghalaya, Mizoram, and Orissa, the annual cost of illness represents more than 0.1% of a gross state income.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Tribal populations living in forests in Orissa, India, have incidence rates that are almost 10 times higher than in the plains.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Odisha is one of the most highly malaria-endemic states in India, accounting for 24% of reported cases in 2010 despite consisting of less of than 4% of the national population. Malaria is particularly common among tribal groups which represent 44% of the population of Orissa.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; A study in Sundargarh District of Odisha showed that forest areas had an annual incidence of 280 cases per 1000 population compared to 30 cases per 1000 on the plains. Approximately 84% of infections in forest areas were due to P. falciparum compared to 69% in plain areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Malaria&rsquo;s main victims tend to be poorer populations living in rural communities, with limited or no access to long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; WHO estimates that 216 million cases of malaria occurred globally in 2010; 34 million (16%) of these occurred outside of Africa of which 18.1 million (53%) were due to P. falciparum.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; WHO estimates that 655 000 deaths occurred globally, of which 46 000 (7%) occurred outside of Africa. WHO estimates that 2.5 billion people were at risk of malaria outside of Africa.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; There are 98 countries with ongoing transmission of malaria. Of these, 47 lie on the African continent, 21 are in the Americas, and 30 in Europe, Asia, and the Pacific. Of the 98 countries, 81 are in the control phase, 8 in the pre-elimination phase, and 9 in the elimination phase.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; While the disease burden has been declining in countries with fewer malaria cases and deaths, progress has been slower in countries where the bulk of the disease burden lies: India, Indonesia, Myanmar, Pakistan, and Papua New Guinea. These five high-burden countries account for 89% of all malaria cases in the region.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Malaria transmission occurs in 17 countries of Asia. Approximately 2 billion people in the region live at some risk of malaria, of which 525 million live at high risk (reported incidence more than 1 case per 1000 population per year).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Most reported cases of malaria in Asia are due to P. falciparum although the proportion varies considerably by country; it exceeds 80% in the Lao People&rsquo;s Democratic Republic, Myanmar, Timor-Leste, and Viet Nam, while transmission is exclusively due to P. vivax in the Democratic People&rsquo;s Republic of Korea and the Republic of Korea.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Insecticide resistance has now been reported in 24 out of 51 countries with malaria transmission outside of Africa.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to [inside]Children in India 2012-A Statistical Appraisal[/inside], Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, GoI, please <a href="https://im4change.org/docs/659Children_in_India_2012.pdf">click here</a> to access:</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em><strong>Neonatal Mortality Rate</strong></em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2010, the neonatal mortality rate (Probability of dying in the first month of life, expressed per 1,000 live births) at national level is at 33 and ranges from 19 in urban areas to 36 in rural areas. Among bigger states, neo-natal mortality rate is highest in Madhya Pradesh (44) and lowest in Kerala (7).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The rural&ndash;urban gap in neo natal mortality rate was highest in Andhra Pradesh and Assam (23 points), followed by Rajasthan (22 points). The rural &ndash;urban gap in neo natal mortality rate lowest in Kerala (3 points), followed by Tamil Nadu (6 points).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Factors which affect fetal and neonatal deaths are primarily endogenous, while those which affect post neonatal deaths are primarily exogenous. The endogenous factors are related to the formation of the foetus in the womb and are therefore, mainly biological in nature. Among the biological factors affecting fetal and neonatal infant mortality rates the important ones are the age of the mother, birth order, period of spacing between births, prematurity, weight at birth, mothers health.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em><strong>Infant Mortality Rate&nbsp;</strong></em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Infant Mortality Rate (Probability of dying between birth and exactly 1 year of age, expressed per 1,000 live births) has declined for males from 78 in 1990 to 46 in 2010 and for females the decline was from 81 to 49 during this period.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Infant Mortality Rate for the country as a whole declined from 66 in 2001 to 47 in 2010. With the present improved trend due to sharp fall during 2008-09, the national level estimate of infant mortality rate is likely to be 44 against the MDG target of 27 in 2015.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Infant Mortality Rate has declined in urban areas from 50 in 1990 to 31 in 2010, whereas in rural areas Infant Mortality Rate has declined from 86 to 51 during the same period.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Infant Mortality Rate in 2010, was lowest in Goa (10) followed by Kerala (13) and Manipur (14). The States of Madhya Pradesh (62), Orissa (61), Uttar Pradesh (61), Assam (58), Meghalaya (55), Rajasthan (55), Chhattisgarh (51), Bihar (48) and Haryana (48) reported infant mortality rate above the national average (47).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Among infants, the main causes of death are: Certain Conditions Originating in the Perinatal Period (67.2%), Certain infectious and Parasitic diseases (8.3%), Diseases of the Respiratory System (7.7%), Congenial Malformations, Deformations &amp; chromosomal Abnormalities (3.3%), Other causes (10.6%).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em><strong>Under Five Mortality Rate&nbsp;</strong></em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Under Five Mortality Rate (Probability of dying between birth and exactly 5 years of age, expressed per 1,000 live births) in India for the year 2010, stands at 59 and it varies from 66 in rural areas to 38 in Urban areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Under Five Mortality Rate stood at 64 for females whereas it is 55 for males in 2010.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Under Five Mortality Rate varies from lowest in Kerala (15), followed by 27 in Tamil Nadu to alarmingly high level in Assam (83), followed by Madhya Pradesh (82), Uttar Pradesh (79) and Odisha (78).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Given to reduce Under Five Mortality Rate to 42 per thousand live births by 2015, India tends to reach near to 52 by that year missing the target by 10 percentage points.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Among children aged 0 to 4 years, the main causes of death are: Certain infectious and Parasitic Diseases (23.1%), Diseases of the Respiratory System (16.1%), Diseases of the Nervous System (12.1%), Diseases of the Circulatory System (7.9%), Injury, Poisoning etc (0.9%), Other major causes (33.9 %).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em><strong>Immunization</strong></em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; At national level, 61% of the children aged 12-23 months have received full immunization in 2009. The coverage of immunization was higher in urban areas (67.4%) as compared to that in the rural areas (58.5%).&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Nearly 8% Indian children did not receive even a single vaccine in 2009. Nearly 62% of the male children aged 12-23 months have received full immunization, while among the females it was nearly 60%.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; 76.6 percent of children aged 12-23 months received full immunization coverage whose mothers had 12 or more years of education whereas 45.3 percent of children whose mothers had no education got full immunization.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; About 75.5% of children of less than one year belonging to the highest wealth index group are fully immunized while only 47.3% from the lowest quintile are fully immunized.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The full immunization coverage of children age 12-23 months is highest in Goa (87.9%), followed by Sikkim (85.3%), Punjab (83.6%), and Kerala (81.5%). The full immunization coverage is lowest in Arunachal Pradesh (24.8%).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to [inside]WHO Global Report: Mortality Attributable to Tobacco (2012)[/inside], please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Mortality%20due%20to%20tobacco.pdf" title="Mortality due to tobacco">click here</a> to access:&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Globally 12% of all deaths among adults aged 30 years and over were attributed to tobacco as compared with 16% in India, 17% in Pakistan and 31% in Bangladesh.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In India, the death rate from non-communicable diseases (NCDs) [1096 per 100,000 population] was about 3.3 times that for communicable diseases [336 per 100,000]. Tobacco was responsible for 9% of all NCDs as compared with 2% of all communicable disease related deaths.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The death rate due to tobacco in Indian men was 206 [per 100,000 men aged 30 years and over] as compared with 13 [per 100,000 women aged 30 years and over] for women. The proportion of deaths attributable to tobacco was almost 12% for men and 1% for women in India. &nbsp; &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Within the NCDs, ischaemic heart disease accounted for 329 deaths per 100,000 population aged 30 years and over, with 5% of these deaths attributed to tobacco in India. Cancer of the trachea, bronchus and lung accounted for 16 deaths per 100,000 population but with 58% of these deaths attributed to tobacco.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Within the communicable disease group, deaths attributed to tobacco accounted for 5% of all lower respiratory infection deaths and 4% of all tuberculosis deaths in India. &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The regions with the highest proportion of deaths atrributable to tobacco are the Americas and the European regions where tobacco has been used for a longer period of time.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; 71% of all lung cancer deaths globally are attributable to tobacco use. 42% of all chronic deaths globally are attributable to tobacco use.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Direct tobacco smoking is currently responsible for the death of about 5 million people worldwide each year with many deaths occuring prematurely. An additional 600,000 people are estimated to die from the effects of second-hand smoke.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In next 2 decades, the annual death from tobacco globally is expected to rise to over 8 million, with more than 80% of those deaths projected to occur in low-and middle-income countries.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; If effective measures are not urgently taken, tpbacco could in the 21st century kill over 1 billion people worldwide. Tobacco kills more than tuberculosis, HIV/ AIDS and malaria combined.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to the report titled [inside]The Growing Danger of Non-Communicable Diseases: Acting Now to Reverse Course (2011)[/inside], September, The World Bank, please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/The%20Growing%20Danger%20of%20Non-Communicable%20Diseases.pdf" title="The Growing Danger of Non-Communicable Diseases">click here</a> to access:</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> &bull; Heart disease, cancer, diabetes, chronic respiratory conditions, and other non-communicable diseases (NCDs) increasingly threaten the physical health and economic security of many lower-and middle-income countries.<br /> <br /> &bull; The change in mortality and disease levels will be particularly substantial in Sub-Saharan Africa, where NCDs will account for 46 percent of all deaths by 2030, up from 28 percent in 2008, and in South Asia, which will see the share of deaths from NCDs increase from 51 to 72 percent during the same period. More than 30 percent of these deaths will be premature and preventable. These lower-income countries will, at the same time, continue to grapple with the widespread prevalence of communicable diseases such as HIV, malaria, tuberculosis, and mother and child conditions, and so face a &ldquo;double burden&rdquo; of disease not experienced by their wealthier counterparts.<br /> <br /> &bull; The potential cost of NCDs to economies, health systems, households and individuals in middle- and lower-income countries is high. In many middle- and lower-income countries, NCDs are affecting populations at younger ages, resulting in longer periods of ill-health, premature deaths and greater loss of productivity that is so vital for development.<br /> <br /> &bull; Much of the rise in NCDs in developing countries is attributable to modifiable risk factors such as physical inactivity, malnutrition in the first thousand days of life and later an unhealthy diet (including excessive salt, fat, and sugar intake), tobacco use, alcohol abuse, and exposure to environmental pollution.<br /> <br /> &bull; Country evidence suggests that more than half of the NCD burden could be avoided through effective health promotion and disease prevention programs that tackle such risk factors. Particularly effective at very low costs are measures to curb tobacco, such as taxes, as indicated in the &ldquo;WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control&rdquo;, and to reduce salt in processed and semi processed foods.<br /> <br /> &bull; By 2030, cancer incidence is projected to increase by 70 percent in middle-income countries and 82 percent in lower-income countries.<br /> <br /> &bull; While increases in NCD-related mortality and ill-health in part reflect countries&rsquo; successes in extending lives and curbing communicable diseases, a significant part of the increase is a result of modifiable risk factors, many of which are linked to modernization, urbanization, and lifestyle changes.<br /> <br /> &bull; The rise of NCDs amongst younger populations may jeopardize many countries&rsquo; &ldquo;demographic dividend&rdquo;, including the economic benefits expected to be generated during the period when a relatively larger part of the population is of working age. Instead, these countries will have to contend with the costs associated with populations that are living with longer episodes of illhealth.<br /> <br /> &bull; Cardiovascular disease is already a major cause of death and disability in South Asia, where the average age of first-time heart attack sufferers is 53 compared to 59 in the rest of the world.<br /> <br /> &bull; A recent study illustrated the economic impact of NCDs in India by estimating that if NCDs were &ldquo;eliminated&rdquo;, the country&rsquo;s 2004 GDP would have been 4 to 10 percent greater.<br /> <br /> &bull; The share of out-of-pocket household health expenditures on NCDs in India increased from 32 percent to 47 percent between 1995&ndash;1996 and 2004. Moreover, 40 percent of these expenditures were financed by borrowing and sales of assets, increasing the household&rsquo;s financial vulnerability. NCDs also increase the risk of households incurring &ldquo;catastrophic&rdquo; health costs. In South Asia, the chance of incurring catastrophic hospitalization expenditures was 160 percent higher for cancer patients and 30 percent higher for those with cardiovascular diseases than it was for those with a communicable disease requiring hospitalization .<br /> <br /> &bull; Because of their specific characteristics, NCDs affect adults&mdash;often in their productive years, require costly long term treatment and care, and often are accompanied by some degree of disability. Therefore, they could potentially have greater socio-economic impact than other health conditions. Increased NCD levels can: reduce labor supply and outputs, increase costs to employers (from absenteeism and higher health care coverage costs), lower returns on human capital investments, reduced domestic consumption and lower tax revenues, as well as increased public health and social welfare expenditures.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to the report titled: [inside]AIDS at 30: Nations at the crossroads (2011)[/inside], which has been brought out by UNAIDS, please <a href="http://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/media_asset/aids-at-30_1.pdf">click here</a> to access:&nbsp;&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; The number of people living with HIV was around 34 million worldwide in 2010.<br /> <br /> &bull; There were 2.6 million new HIV infections worldwide in 2009.<br /> <br /> &bull; Between 1981 and 2000, the number of people living with HIV rose from less than one million to an estimated 27.5 million [26&ndash;29 million].<br /> <br /> &bull; Low- and middle-income countries accounted for 95% or more of the global HIV burden by 1998.<br /> <br /> &bull; While less than 1% of adults in South Africa were living with HIV in 1990, 16.1% were living with HIV a decade later. During the same period, adult HIV prevalence rose from less than 1% to 24.5% in Lesotho, and from 3.5% to 26% in Botswana.<br /> <br /> &bull; Half of HIV infections in Eastern Europe and Central Asia in 2010 were due to drug users sharing needles.<br /> <br /> &bull; Clinical trials show that male circumcision reduces the chance of men becoming HIV-positive by about 60%.<br /> <br /> &bull; Beginning in 2005, a series of randomized controlled trials in sub-Saharan Africa found that circumsising adult men reduced their risk of infection by about 60%.<br /> <br /> &bull; Scientific knowledge about HIV expanded steadily in the years 1981&ndash;2000. The virus was identified in 1983, and the first serologic test became available in 1985. In the 1990s, studies demonstrated in developed and low- and middle-income countries the possibility of significantly lowering the risk of vertical transmission.<br /> <br /> &bull; Today, 94% of countries (162 of 172 countries reporting) have national HIV strategic plans, up from 87% in 2006. The coordination of national responses also improved during the epidemic&rsquo;s third decade. Two out of three (67%) countries in 2010 reported having a single HIV monitoring and evaluation system, up from 46% in 2006, although country reports cite insufficient coordination of diverse partners as a continuing challenge to national responses.<br /> <br /> &bull; According to the latest UNGASS reports, AIDS expenditures in 2009 totalled US$ 1.07 billion. Estimates based on the methodology suggested by the Commission on AIDS in Asia indicate that US$ 3.3 billion is needed for a targeted response across the region.<br /> <br /> &bull; There was a significant increase in investment in the HIV response in low- and middle-income countries between 2001 and 2009, with total expenditure rising nearly 10-fold, from US$ 1.6 billion to US$ 15.9 billion.<br /> <br /> &bull; Public and private domestic resources accounted for 52% of total spending on HIV programmes in low- and middle-income countries in 2009, but many low-income countries remain heavily dependent on external financing. In 56 countries, international donors supply at least 70% of HIV resources. This pattern potentially encourages the emergence of new global inequities, as millions of people in sub-Saharan Africa now rely on external donors on a daily basis for the drugs and services that keep them alive.<br /> <br /> &bull; The UNAIDS Domestic Investment Priority Index, a formula that accounts for total HIV burden and government resources, shows that eight of 14 countries in West and Central Africa, six of 16 countries in Eastern and Southern Africa, and all but four countries in Asia were allocating inadequate resources to HIV in&nbsp; 2009.<br /> <br /> &bull; According to research from nine countries under the People Living with HIV Stigma Index, 53% of Rwandans living with HIV have been verbally insulted, 33% of rural Zambians living with HIV have experienced physical violence, and 65% of Rwandans living with HIV have lost a job or income opportunity. Furthermore, women living with HIV from various countries report abuses of their sexual and reproductive health and rights. Nearly 20% of women in Namibia who participated in discussions and interviews with the International Community of Women Living with HIV (ICW), reported that they had been coerced or forced into sterilization. Such deep-seated social ostracism and discriminatory actions discourage people from being tested for HIV or seeking other needed services.<br /> <br /> &bull; Among young women in South Africa, experience of intimate partner violence increases the odds of becoming infected with HIV by 11.9%, while gender inequality within a relationship increases the risk by 13.9%, according to a study reported in The Lancet in 2010.<br /> <br /> &bull; According to the UNAIDS Global Report 2010, the proportion of countries reporting programmes to address stigma and discrimination increased from 39% in 2006 to 92% in 2010, although a budget for these programmes was in place in less than half of these countries.<br /> <br /> &bull; More than 56 countries have laws that specifically criminalize HIV transmission or exposure, with the majority of prosecutions reported in high-income countries. As of April 2011, 47 countries, territories and areas imposed some form of restriction on the entry, stay and residence of people living with HIV. However, in a more positive development, China, Namibia and USA lifted their HIV-related travel restrictions in 2010, while Ecuador and India clarified that no such restrictions were in place.<br /> <br /> &bull; In 116 countries, territories and areas, some aspect of sex work is criminalized. Seventy-nine countries and territories worldwide criminalize consensual same-sex sexual relations, including 85% of countries in Eastern and Southern Africa, 81% in the Middle East and North Africa, and 69% in the Caribbean.<br /> <br /> &bull; Thirty-two countries have laws that allow for the death penalty for drug-related offences, and 27 provide for the compulsory detention of people who use drugs, often without due process or minimum standards of detention or treatment. Such laws, as well as abusive law enforcement and poor access to legal services, deter individuals from seeking needed services, increase their vulnerability to becoming HIV-positive, and intensify their social isolation.<br /> <br /> &bull; As of December 2010, an estimated 6.6 million people in low- and middle-income countries were receiving antiretroviral therapy, an increase of 1.4 million from a year earlier. Between 2001 and 2010, the number of people receiving antiretroviral treatment rose nearly 22-fold, a vivid illustration of the power of international solidarity, innovative approaches and people-centred responses.<br /> <br /> &bull; In sub-Saharan Africa the number of people receiving antiretroviral treatment in 2010 increased by 31%; in the Middle East and North Africa, that figure was 21%.<br /> <br /> &bull; As of December 2009, seven countries had already reached at least 80% of treatment-eligible individuals with antiretroviral treatment. Eighteen countries reported treatment coverage of at least 60%.<br /> <br /> &bull; Since its emergence in 1996, highly active anti retroviral therapy has saved an estimated 14.4 million life years worldwide as of December 2009. Although 54% of life-years saved between 1995 and 2009 were in Western Europe and North America, where antiretroviral therapy has long been available, 3.7 million life-years have been saved in sub-Saharan Africa. The pace of reducing morbidity and mortality in sub-Saharan Africa has accelerated since 2005 as a result of dramatic programme scale-up.<br /> <br /> &bull; In 2009, nearly one in five people (18%) who started antiretroviral therapy in low- and middle-income countries were no longer in care 12 months later.<br /> <br /> &bull; At present, more than 95% of patients on treatment are on first-generation antiretroviral medicines, the majority of which are off-patent. As drug resistance increases over time, more patients will require second- and third-generation medicines. Most of these more recent medicines will remain under patent protection for years to come, resulting in potentially drastic increases in treatment costs. This can be alleviated to a large extent by making use of the flexibilities of public health related TRIPS (trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights). In March 2011, UNAIDS, WHO and UNDP issued a policy brief calling on all countries to use TRIPS flexibilities to lower costs and improve access to HIV treatment. By 2005, five years after affordable means of preventing vertical transmission became available, only 15% of HIV-positive pregnant women in low- and middle-income countries received antiretroviral prophylaxis.<br /> <br /> &bull; More than 50% of pregnant women who tested positive for HIV in 2010 were assessed for their eligibility to receive antiretroviral therapy for their own health. These gains in reducing vertical transmission have helped to reduce childhood mortality. The number of children newly infected with HIV in 2009 (370 000 [230 000&ndash;510 000]) was 26% lower than in 2001.<br /> <br /> &bull; According to the most recent population-based surveys in low- and middle-income countries with available data, only 24% of young women and 36% of young men responded correctly when asked five questions about HIV prevention methods and popular misconceptions about HIV transmission. Young women tend to be less likely than young men to be aware of the prevention benefits of consistent condom use. When prompted, 74% of young males in DHS surveys knew that using a condom helps to prevent HIV infection, while only 49% of young females knew the right answer. Some 78% of young males also knew that having a single, faithful partner lowers the risk of HIV infection, compared to only 59% of young females.<br /> <br /> &bull; In 14 countries where HIV prevalence exceeds 2% and where nationally representative data are available, more than 70% of men and women who had high-risk sex in the past year report not using a condom the last time they had sex.<br /> <br /> &bull; Globally, HIV prevalence levels above those reported in the general population have been documented among men who have sex with men (MSM), transgender people, people who inject drugs (IDUs), and sex workers.<br /> <br /> &bull; According to the most recently available data, the proportion of countries reporting that they conduct systematic surveillance of HIV among key populations increased between 2008 and 2010: for sex workers, from 44% to 50%; for MSM, from 30% to 36%; while among IDUs it remained stable at 28%.<br /> <br /> &bull; An estimated 20% of the 15.9 million IDUs worldwide are living with HIV. This statistic underscores the world&rsquo;s failure to put the lessons of harm reduction to use. In at least 69 countries where injecting drug use has been documented, no programme to provide even sterile needles and syringes exists.<br /> <br /> &bull; The epidemic among MSM communities is a worldwide phenomenon, with 63 out of 67 countries reporting in 2009 a higher HIV prevalence among MSM compared with the general population.<br /> <br /> &bull; At least 79 countries, territories and areas have laws against male&ndash;male sexual contact, including some that authorize the death penalty.<br /> <br /> &bull; Among 56 countries reporting in both 2008 and 2010, median condom use with the most recent client reached 84%, with a range from about two thirds to nearly 100%.<br /> <br /> &bull; According to recent estimates, HIV is a leading cause of pregnancyrelated deaths, accounting for about 11% of all maternal deaths in 2008.<br /> <br /> &bull; HIV-positive newborns have about a 50% risk of death before age two in the absence of treatment.<br /> <br /> &bull; In 2009, HIV accounted for 2.1% (1.2&ndash;3.0%) of under-five deaths in low- and middle-income countries, a decline from 2.6% (1.6&ndash;3.5%) in 2000.<br /> <br /> &bull; In sub-Saharan Africa, HIV was responsible for 3.6% (2.0&ndash;5.0%) of all deaths in children under five in 2009. Here, too, striking achievements are evident, as the HIV share of all under-five deaths has sharply fallen from the 5.4% (3.3%&ndash;7.3%) reported in 2000.<br /> <br /> &bull; Universal access to effective prevention, diagnosis and treatment for HIV-related tuberculosis (TB) could prevent up to one million TB deaths in people living with HIV between now and 2015, but the world is falling far short of this target.<br /> <br /> &bull; Only 28% of TB patients globally knew their HIV status in 2009, and only 5% of people living with HIV were screened for TB. Although early initiation of antiretroviral therapy significantly reduces the risk of death among HIV-positive people with TB, only 37% of these HIV-positive TB patients got HIV therapy in 2009.<br /> <br /> &bull; According to data compiled by WHO, 10 countries accounted for more than 69% of all people with HIV-related TB in 2009.<br /> <br /> &bull; 25% of all TB deaths are in people with HIV, and there are one million cases of TB in people with HIV a year.<br /> <br /> &bull; Between 2001 and 2009, global HIV incidence steadily declined, with the annual rate of new infections falling by nearly 25%.<br /> <br /> &bull; Above-average declines in HIV incidence have occurred in sub-Saharan Africa and in South and South-East Asia, while Latin America and the Caribbean and Oceania regions experienced more modest reductions of less than 25%.<br /> <br /> &bull; Rates of new infections have remained relatively stable in East Asia, Western and Central Europe, and North America. HIV incidence has steadily increased in the Middle East and North Africa, while in Eastern Europe and Central Asia, a decline in new infections was reversed mid-decade, with incidence rising slightly from 2005 to 2009.<br /> <br /> &bull; Coverage of services to prevent new child infections increased from 15% in 2005 to 54% in 2009. The HIV incidence rate declined by more than 25% between 2001 and 2009. Antiretroviral treatment coverage is increasing.<br /> <br /> &bull; Some 22.5 million people now live with HIV in Africa. The majority (60%) are women and girls. HIV prevalence is as high as 25% in some countries, and the rate of people becoming newly infected outpaces treatment access. Of the 16.6 million children globally who have lost one or both parents to an AIDS-related illness, 14.9 million are in Africa.<br /> <br /> &bull; The Asia Pacific region has made significant progress in controlling HIV&rsquo;s spread. The number of people living with HIV has remained stable for the past five years and estimated new infections are 20% lower than in 2001. Thailand, Cambodia and certain parts of India have turned their epidemics around by providing quality services to their key populations at higher risk.<br /> <br /> &bull; In 2009, median reported prevention coverage for people who inject drugs was 17%; for men who have sex with men 36.5%; and for female sex workers 41%. Programmes in key affected populations to prevent transmission to intimate sexual partners are severely lacking.<br /> <br /> **page**<br /> &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Please <a href="https://im4change.org/hunger-hdi/sdgs-113.html?pgno=5#trends-in-maternal-mortality-1990-to-2008-estimates">click here</a> to access the Trends in Maternal Mortality: 1990 to 2008 Estimates developed by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA and The World Bank:</span><br /> &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">According to [inside]A Fair Chance at Life: Why Equity Matters for Children (2010)[/inside], which has been prepared by Save the Children, please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/A%20fair%20chance%20of%20life.pdf" title="A fair chance of life">click here</a> to access:</span><br /> <span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp; </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;In 2000, the world&rsquo;s governments committed themselves to make a two-thirds reduction in the child mortality rate by 2015 &ndash; the fourth of eight United Nations Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). But with five years to go before the target date, the world is collectively off track to reach MDG 4. Just 40% of the necessary progress has been achieved so far, and in three-quarters of countries the goal will be missed on current trends.&nbsp; </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The child mortality rate at a global level has fallen by just 28% since the MDG baseline year of 1990, far short of the 67% reduction required to meet the goal. Less than 30% of countries are making equitable progress towards MDG 4.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Ghana, Mozambique, Niger, Egypt, Indonesia, Bolivia and Zambia have made equitable progress in reducing child mortality. Chad, Congo, Kenya, South Africa and Zimbabwe have actually seen increases in their child mortality rates since 1990. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;In sub-Saharan Africa, close to one child in seven still dies before their fifth birthday. Although the mortality rate in sub-Saharan Africa has fallen, high fertility levels mean that the absolute number of child deaths in the region has increased since 1990, from 4.2 to 4.6 million.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Almost all child deaths &ndash; 99% &ndash; happen in the developing world. A person born in sub-Saharan Africa can expect to live, on average, 52 years. In western Europe, life expectancy is 80 years. The life expectancy rates in sub-Saharan Africa today have not been seen in Europe since the beginning of the 20th century. In 40 developing countries, children have less chance of living to the age of five than a person in the UK has of living to the age of 65.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Sri Lanka &ndash; with a per capita income of $1,790 &ndash; has a child mortality rate of 13, less than half the level in Guatemala, which has a per capita income of $2,680. Gabon has an equivalent per capita income to Argentina, but a child mortality rate of 57, almost four times higher.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;In India, high levels of selective abortion contribute to skewed male-to-female birth ratios. Son preference in India and China can result in high mortality among girls because they are not adequately breastfed or given the same access to medical treatment. A study of 4,000 children aged between one and two in India found that the likelihood of girls being fully vaccinated was five percentage points lower than that for boys. In Gujarat, India, 50% of women feel they need the permission of their husband or parent-in-law before taking their sick child to a doctor.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;High child mortality, illness and malnutrition can be a brake on economic and social development. Children who are sick and undernourished, especially in the first two years of life, often pay a life-long and irreversible price in terms of physical stunting and reduced cognitive ability.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;On the positive side, of the 68 &lsquo;Countdown to 2015&rsquo; countries (which together account for 97% of maternal and child deaths worldwide), 60 have reduced child mortality since 1990. A recent study found that the rate of reduction has accelerated since 2000, compared with the period from 1990 to 2000.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Of the 68 &lsquo;Countdown to 2015&rsquo; priority countries, only 19 are on-track to reach MDG 4. Eleven more are making faster-than-average progress, but still not enough progress to achieve MDG 4 by 2015.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;It is estimated that children under five make up 85% of those who die as a result of climate change; 44% of child deaths happen in countries considered fragile; and nearly 70% of the countries with the highest child mortality burden are currently experiencing or have experienced armed violence in the last two decades.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Inadequate care before birth and during delivery contributes to 40% of child deaths. Even babies who survive the neonatal period (up to 28 days) have greatly reduced chances of surviving beyond the age of five if their mothers die, in part because they are less likely to receive adequate nutrition and healthcare.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Although the percentage of stunted children decreased globally from 40% to 27% between 1990 and 2010, the number of stunted children is projected to increase in many areas. In Africa, the number of stunted children is estimated to have increased from 45 million in 1990 to 60 million in 2010.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Undernutrition among pregnant women in developing countries leads to one in six infants being born with low birth weight, which not only carries a high risk of neonatal death, but can also permanently damage long-term cognitive and physical development.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Infectious diseases accounted for an estimated 68% of the 8.8 million child deaths in 2008, with pneumonia accounting for 18% and diarrhoea for 15% of the global total. More than 40% of deaths from pneumonia and diarrhoea take place in sub-Saharan Africa, where 42% of people lack access to an improved water source, and almost 70% are without adequate sanitation.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Improved drinking water sources and proper sanitation are crucial to reducing child deaths from diarrhoea, while an estimated 45% of cases could be prevented by simple hand washing with soap.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;If women and men had equal status, it is estimated that the proportion of underweight children below the age of three years would fall by 13 percentage points globally.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">According to [inside]Women on the Front Lines of Health Care, State of the World&#39;s Mothers 2010[/inside], </span><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Women%20on%20the%20front%20line.pdf" title="Women on the front line">click here</a> to access</span><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">: </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Every year, 50 million women in the developing world give birth with no professional help and 8.8 million children and newborns die from easily preventable or treatable causes. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Worldwide, there are 57 countries with critical health workforce shortages, meaning that they have fewer than 23 doctors, nurses and midwives per 10,000 people. Thirty-six of these countries are in sub-Saharan Africa. Making up for these shortages would require an additional 2.4 million doctors, nurses and midwives.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Thirty-six of the countries with critical health worker shortages are in sub-Saharan Africa, which has 12 percent of the world&rsquo;s population, 25 percent of the global burden of disease, and only 3 percent of the world&rsquo;s health workers. South and East Asia have 29 percent of the disease burden and only 12 percent of the health workers.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;41 percent of the child deaths occur among newborn babies in the first month of life.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;99 percent of child and maternal deaths occur in developing countries where mothers and children lack access to basic health-care services.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;250,000 women&rsquo;s lives and 5.5 million children&rsquo;s lives could be saved each year if all women and children had access to a full package of essential health care.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Every year 8.8 million children die before reaching age 5.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Every year 343,000 women lose their lives due to pregnancy or childbirth complications.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;An additional 4.3 million health workers are needed in developing countries to help save lives and meet the health-related Millennium Development Goals.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The eleventh annual Mothers&rsquo; Index helps document conditions for mothers and children in 160 countries &ndash; 43 developed nations and 117 in the developing world &ndash; and shows where mothers fare best and where they face the greatest hardships.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;European countries &ndash; along with New Zealand and Australia &ndash; dominate the top positions while countries in sub-Saharan Africa dominate the lowest tier.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">According to [inside]Performance Audit-Report No. 8 of 2009-10[/inside], please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Performace%20Audit.pdf" title="Performance audit NRHM">click here</a> to access:</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;This is the latest and an extremely significant report on the status and performance of the National Rural Health Mission (NRHM) all over India providing clues for areas of concern and immediate action. Some of the salient features are as follows:</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The performance audit on implementation of the NRHM was conducted during April-December 2008 in the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, State Health Societies (SHS) of 33 States/UTs, District Health Societies (DHS) of 129 districts and 2369 health centres at block and village levels covering the period from 2005-06 to 2007-08.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The NRHM initiated decentralised bottom-up planning. This, however, had been hindered by non-completion of household and facility surveys and State specific perspective plans. In nine States, district level annual plans were not prepared during 2005-08 and in 24 States/UTs block and village level annual plans had not been prepared at all.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Village level health and sanitation committees were still to be constituted in nine States. The Rogi Kalyan Samitis (RKS) formed at many health centres, aiming at community ownership of healthcare delivery systems, were characterised by weak or absent grievance redressal mechanisms, outreach and awareness generation efforts.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;No RKS in any State/UT received all the stipulated central grants. In 13 States/UTs, the Samiti failed to generate internal resources, while in the remaining States no mechanism existed to monitor the generation of a third of the RKS funds from internal resources as prescribed.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The participation of Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs) in the Mission&rsquo;s activities had not been facilitated and their contribution towards capacity building and service delivery was not effectively monitored. 71 per cent of the districts countrywide were yet to be covered under the Mother NGO scheme.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;During the period 2005-06 to 2007-08, the total outlay/expenditure on the NRHM was Rs. 24,151.45 crore. During the first two years the Centre was contributing 100 per cent of the funds. Thereafter, the States were to contribute 15 per cent of funds during the 11th Five Year Plan (2007-12). However, many of the States were yet to contribute their share to the Mission and this issue needs to be addressed. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Many high focus States where diseases are endemic and health indicators poor, were however, receiving relatively lesser central grants, as high unspent balances of previous years remained, indicating that capacity building needs to be focused on.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Basic facilities (proper buildings, hygienic environment, electricity and water supply etc.) were still absent in many existing health centres with many Primary Health Centres (PHCs) and Community Health Centres (CHCs) being unable to provide guaranteed services such as inpatient services, operation theatres, labour rooms, pathological tests, X-ray facilities and emergency care etc.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;While contract workers have been engaged to fill vacancies, there are still shortages of specialist doctors at CHCs, adequate staff nurses at CHCs/PHCs and Auxiliary Nursing Midwife (ANMs)/ Multi-purpose Worker (MPWs) at Sub Centres.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;In nine States, the stock of essential drugs, contraceptives and vaccines adequate for two months consumption as required under norms were not available in any of the test checked PHCs and CHCs.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Despite holding two National Immunisation Days, six Special National Immunisation Days (and additional rounds in selected districts of Bihar and Uttar Pradesh), 1640 new polio cases had been detected in 17 States/UTs during 2005-08.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> <span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">According to [inside]&lsquo;Diarrhoea: Why children are still dying and what can be done?&rsquo; (2009)[/inside], please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Diarrhoea%20Why%20children%20are%20still%20dying%20and%20what%20can%20be%20done.pdf" title="Diarrhoea Why children are still dying and what can be done">click here</a> to access:</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Diarrhoea is defined as having loose or watery stools at least three times per day, or more frequently than normal for an individual. Though most episodes of childhood diarrhoea are mild, acute cases can lead to death and other complications. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The leading cause of diarrhea is lack of sanitation and safe drinking water and the life threatening disease is very easily curable with simple tablets and rehydration. (An estimated 88 per cent of diarrhoeal deaths worldwide are attributable to unsafe water, inadequate sanitation and poor hygiene.)</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Most pathogens that cause diarrhoea share a similar mode of transmission &ndash; from the stool of one person to the mouth of another.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;In India, under-five mortality rate (per 1000 live births) was 69 during 2008. The number of under-five deaths was 18,30,000 during 2008. The percentage of children under-five with diarrhoea receiving ORS packet during 2005-2008 was 26%.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Nearly, nine million children under five years of age die each year. Diarrhoea is second only to pneumonia as the cause of these deaths.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Reducing these deaths depends largely on delivering life-saving treatment of low-osmolarity oral rehydration salts (ORS) and zinc tablets to all children in need.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Examples of rehydrating fluids include cereal-based drinks made from a thin gruel of rice, maize, potato or other readily available low-cost grain or root crop the family has at home. Breastmilk is also an excellent drink for fluid replacement and should continue to be given to infants with diarrhoea simultaneously with other oral rehydration solutions.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;According to the latest available figures, an estimated 2.5 billion people lack improved sanitation facilities, and nearly one billion people do not have access to safe drinking water. These unsanitary environments allow diarrhoea-causing pathogens to spread more easily.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Globally, 1.2 billion people practise open defecation, 83 per cent of whom live in 13 countries</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Together, pneumonia and diarrhoea are responsible for an estimated 40 per cent of all child deaths around the world each year.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Nearly 1 in 4 people in developing countries were practising indiscriminate or open defecation in 2006.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Nearly one in five child deaths &ndash; about 1.5 million each year &ndash; is due to diarrhoea. It kills more young children than AIDS, malaria and measles combined.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Between 1990 and 2006, the proportion of the developing world&rsquo;s population using an improved drinking water source rose from 71 per cent to 84 per cent. Still, almost 1 billion people lack access to improved drinking water sources, and many households do not treat or safely store their household water supplies.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The prevention package highlights five main elements that require a concerted approach in their implementation. The package includes: a) rotavirus and measles vaccinations, b) promotion of early and exclusive breastfeeding and vitamin A supplementation, c) promotion of handwashing with soap, d) improved water supply quantity and quality, including treatment and safe storage of household water, and e) community-wide sanitation promotion.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Mortality from diarrhoea has declined over the past two decades from an estimated 5 million deaths among children under five to 1.5 million deaths in 2004 </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Africa and South Asia are home to more than 80 per cent of child deaths due to diarrhoea</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Improving sanitation facilities has been associated with an estimated median reduction in diarrhoea incidence of 36 per cent across reviewed studies.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Interventions to improve water quality at the source, along with treatment of household water and safe storage systems, have been shown to reduce diarrhoea incidence by as much as 47 per cent.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Diarrhoea often leads to stunting in children due to its association with poor nutrient absorption and appetite loss.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Breastmilk contains the nutrients, antioxidants, hormones and antibodies needed by a child to survive and develop.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Undernourished children are more likely to suffer from diarrhoea and its consequences, which, in turn, increases their chances of worsening nutritional status. Today, 129 million children under the age of five in the developing world are underweight for their age. Together, Africa and South Asia account for more than 80 per cent of total underweight children (25 per cent and 57 per cent, respectively). About 40 per cent of children under five years of age are stunted in Africa, and nearly half in South Asia.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Only 37 per cent of infants in developing countries are exclusively breastfed for the first six months of life.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Boys and girls are equally likely to receive ORS to treat diarrhoea. Children in urban areas (39 percent) are more likely to receive ORS than those living in rural areas (31 per cent). Similarly, children from the wealthiest families are 1.5 times as likely to receive ORS to treat their diarrhoea as the poorest children</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">**page**<em>&nbsp;</em></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">According to the [inside]World Health Statistics 2009[/inside], please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/World%20Health%20Statistics%202009.pdf" title="World Health Statistics 2009">click here</a> to access:</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp; </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The proportion of under-nourished children under five years of age declined from 27% in 1990 to 20% in 2005. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Some 27% fewer children died before their fifth birthday in 2007 than in 1990. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Maternal mortality has barely changed since 1990. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;One third of 9.7 million people in developing countries who need treatment for HIV/AIDS were receiving it in 2007. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;MDG target for reducing the incidence of tuberculosis was met globally in 2004. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;27 countries reported a reduction of up to 50% in the number of malaria cases between 1990 and 2006. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The number of people with access to safe drinking-water rose from 4.1 billion in 1990 to 5.7 billion in 2006. About 1.1 billion people in developing regions gained access to improved sanitation in the same period. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Globally, the proportion of children under five years of age suffering from under-nutrition, according to WHO Child Growth Standards, declined from 27% in 1990 to 20% in 2005. But, the progress is uneven, and an estimated 112 million children are underweight. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Globally, the number of children who die before their fifth birthday has been reduced by 27% from 12.5 million estimated in 1990 to 9 million in 2007. This reduction is due to a combination of interventions, including the use of insecticide-treated mosquito nets for malaria, oral rehydration therapy for diarrhoea, increased access to vaccines for a number of infectious diseases and improved water and sanitation. But pneumonia and diarrhoea continue to kill 3.8 million children aged under five each year, although both conditions are preventable and treatable.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The global maternal mortality ratio of 400 maternal deaths per 100 000 live births in 2005 has barely changed since 1990. Every year an estimated 536 000 women die in pregnancy or childbirth. Most of these deaths occur in sub-Saharan Africa where the maternal mortality ratio is 900 per 100 000 births and where there has been no measurable improvement since 1990. A woman in Africa may face a 1-in-26 lifetime risk of death during pregnancy and childbirth, compared with only 1 in 7300 in the developed regions. 1 There are, however, signs of progress in some countries in Asia and Latin America and the Caribbean.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The percentage of adults living with HIV worldwide has remained stable since 2000 but there were an estimated 2.7 million new infections during 2007. Moreover, deaths are increasing in parts of Africa, particularly eastern and southern Africa. The use of antiretroviral therapy has increased; in 2007, about 1 million more people living with HIV received the treatment. That means one third of the estimated 9.7 million people in developing countries who need the treatment were receiving it. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The MDG target for reducing the incidence of tuberculosis was met globally in 2004. Since then, incidence has continued to fall slowly. Thanks to early detection of new cases and effective treatment using the WHO-recommended DOTS treatment strategy, treatment success rates have been consistently improving, with rates rising from 79% in 1990 to 85% in 2006. Multi-drug resistant tuberculosis is a challenge in countries, such as those of the former Soviet Union, while the lethal combination of HIV and tuberculosis is an issue particularly for sub-Saharan African countries. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Efforts to control malaria are beginning to pay off with significant increases in the proportion of children sleeping under insecticide-treated mosquito nets. Although it is still too early to register the global impact, 27 countries &ndash; including five in Africa &ndash; have reported a reduction of up to 50% in malaria cases between 1990 and 2006. In 2006, the number of cases was estimated to be 250 million globally. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Progress has been made in treating neglected tropical diseases that affect some 1.2 billion people. For example, only 9585 cases of dracunculiasis (guinea-worm disease) were reported in the five countries where the disease is endemic, compared with an estimated 3.5 million reported in 20 such countries in 1985. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The number of people with access to safe drinking water rose from an estimated 4.1 billion in 1990 to 5.7 billion in 2006. But 900 million people still had to rely on water from what are known as unimproved sources, for example surface water or an unprotected dug well.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Since 1990, an estimated 1.1 billion people in developing regions have gained access to improved sanitation. In 1990, just under 3 billion people had access to sanitation. Their number rose to more than 4 billion by 2006. Yet, in 2006 some 2.5 billion did not have access to improved sanitation and 1.2 billion had to practise open defecation. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Although nearly all developing countries publish an essential medicines list, the availability of medicines at public health facilities is often poor. Surveys in about 30 developing countries show that availability of selected medicines at health facilities was only 35% in the public sector and 63% in the private sector. Lack of medicines in the public sector often means patients have no choice but to purchase them privately or do without treatment. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">According to [inside]National Family Health Survey-III (2005-06)[/inside], </span><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">please <a href="http://rchiips.org/NFHS/nfhs3.shtml" title="http://rchiips.org/NFHS/nfhs3.shtml">click here</a> to access:<br /> <br /> <u><strong>NFHS III reports declining status of nutrition amidst women</strong></u></span><br /> &nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">The NFHS III paints a mixed picture of India&rsquo;s overall reproductive health status. Women are having fewer children and infant mortality has dropped in the seven-year period since the last NFHS survey in 1998-99. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Anaemia and malnutrition are still widespread among children and adults. And, in an unusual juxtaposition, more adults, especially urban women, are overweight or obese than they were seven years ago. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> <span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:medium"><u><strong>Trend in Family Planning and Fertility</strong></u> </span></span><br /> &nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Fertility has continued to decline since NFHS-2, dropping to an average of 2.7 children from 2.9 children. Ten states, mostly in Southern India, have reached replacement level or below replacement level fertility. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">While son preference remains a barrier to more rapid decline in fertility, an increasing number of women who have only daughters say that they want no more children. In NFHS-3, 62% of women with two daughters and no sons say they want no more children, compared with 47% in NFHS-2. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Declining fertility could be attributed largely to women&rsquo;s increased use of contraception. For the first time ever, more than half of currently married women in India are using contraception, and their use of modern contraceptive methods increased from 43% to 49% between NFHS-2 and NFHS-3. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">A rise in the average age at marriage is also contributing to the drop in fertility. Forty-five percent of women ages 20-24 were married before the legal age of marriage of 18 years, compared with 50% seven years earlier. This shift in age at marriage also influences the median age at first birth, which increased by six months to 19.8 years. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> <span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:medium"><u><strong>Half of Women Lack Proper Care during Pregnancy and Delivery</strong></u></span></span><br /> &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;More than three-quarters of pregnant women in India received at least some antenatal care (ANC), but only half of women had at least three ANC visits with a health provider during their pregnancy. </span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull;&nbsp;The disparity between urban and rural women was especially pronounced, with 74% of urban women having ANC at least three times, compared with 43% of rural women. Births assisted by a health professional increased to 49% from 42%, with 75% of urban women but only 39% of rural women in NFHS-3 received assistance from a health professional.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull;&nbsp;Institutional births increased from 34% to 41%, but most women still deliver their children at home. Only about one-third of women received postnatal care within two days of delivery.<br /> <br /> <span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><u><strong>Infant Mortality Drops, but Full Immunization Coverage Shows Little Progress</strong></u></span></span></span></p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Infant mortality continues to decline, dropping from 68 in 1998-99 to 57 in 2005-06 per thousand births. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">There were particularly notable drops in the infant mortality rate in Bihar, Goa, Haryana, Jammu and Kashmir, Meghalaya, Orissa, Punjab, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, and Uttar Pradesh. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Overall, there was only a marginal improvement in full vaccination coverage, with 44% of children ages 12-23 months receiving all recommended vaccinations, up from 42% seven years earlier. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Substantial improvements in coverage have been made in all vaccinations except DPT, which did not change at all between NFHS-2 and NFHS-3. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Gains are particularly evident for polio vaccination coverage, but nearly one-quarter of children age 12-23 months did not receive three recommended doses. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Progress in vaccination coverage varies markedly among the states. In 11 states, there has been a substantial deterioration in full immunization coverage in the last seven years, due to a decline in vaccination coverage for both DPT and polio. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Large decline were seen in Maharashtra, Mizoram, Andhra Pradesh, and Punjab. On the other hand, there was major improvement in full immunization coverage in Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Sikkim, and West Bengal. Other states with marked improvements in full immunization coverage were Assam, Haryana, Jammu and Kashmir, Madhya Pradesh, Meghalaya, and Uttaranchal. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Diarrhoea continues to be a major health problem for many children.&nbsp; Although knowledge about Oral Rehydration Salts (ORS) for the treatment of diarrhoea is widespread among mothers, only 58% of children with diarrhoea were taken to a health facility, down from 65% seven years earlier. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">There has been a rise in the number of dispensaries and hospitals, nursing personnel and doctors (including primary health care centers) in between 1991 and 2005/06, as could be deciphered from the table below.</span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:medium"><u><strong>Trends in health care infrastructure</strong></u> </span></span></p> <div> <table align="justify" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" style="height:96px; width:417px"> <caption> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> </caption> <tbody> <tr> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp;</span></td> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:medium"><strong>1991 </strong></span></span></td> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:medium">&nbsp;<strong>2005/2006</strong></span></span></td> </tr> <tr> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp;SC/PHC/CHC (March 2006)</span></td> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp;57353</span></td> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp;171567</span></td> </tr> <tr> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp;Dispensaries and Hospitals (all) (1.4.2006)</span></td> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp;23555</span></td> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp;32156</span></td> </tr> <tr> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp;Nursing Personnel (2005)</span></td> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp;143887</span></td> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp;1481270</span></td> </tr> <tr> </tr> </tbody> </table> </div> ', 'credit_writer' => '', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 10, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'public-health-51', 'meta_title' => '', 'meta_keywords' => '', 'meta_description' => '', 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 51, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [[maximum depth reached]], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 21, 'metaTitle' => 'Hunger / HDI | Public Health', 'metaKeywords' => '', 'metaDesc' => 'KEY TRENDS&nbsp; &nbsp; &bull; The 2019&nbsp;India&nbsp;TB&nbsp;report&nbsp;says&nbsp;that the&nbsp;country&nbsp;accounted for a quarter of the global tuberculosis (TB) burden with an estimated 27 lakh cases in 2018. In 2018, the country was able to achieve a total notification of 21.5 lakh TB cases, of which...', 'disp' => '<p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">KEY TRENDS&nbsp;</span></p><p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p><div style="text-align:justify">&bull; The 2019&nbsp;India&nbsp;TB&nbsp;report&nbsp;says&nbsp;that the&nbsp;country&nbsp;accounted for a quarter of the global tuberculosis (TB) burden with an estimated 27 lakh cases in 2018. In 2018, the country was able to achieve a total notification of 21.5 lakh TB cases, of which 25 percent was from private sector. Majority of the TB burden is among the working age group. Nearly 89 percent of TB cases came from the age group 15-69 years. About 2/3rd of the TB patients were males <strong>*15</strong></div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify">&bull; Maternal Mortality Ratio for India was 370 in 2000, 286 in 2005, 210 in&nbsp; 2010, 158 in 2015 and 145 in 2017. Therefore, the MMRatio for the country reduced by almost 61 percent between 2000 and 2017. MMRatio for China was 59 in 2000, 44 in 2005, 36 in 2010, 30 in 2015 and 29 in 2017. Therefore, the MMRatio for China fell by around 51 percent between 2000 and 2017 <strong>*14</strong> &nbsp;<br />&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify">&bull; The per capita public expenditure (actual) on health in nominal terms has gone up from Rs. 621 in 2009-10 to Rs. 1,112 in 2015-16. Public expenditure on health (includes health sector expenditure by Centre and States/UTs) as a percentage of GDP was 1.02 percent in 2015-16. There is no significant change in public expenditure on health as a percentage of GDP since 2009-10. The Centre-State share in total public expenditure on health was 31:69 in 2015-16, which used to be 36:64 in 2009-10 <strong>*13</strong><br /><br />&bull; The North-Eastern states had the highest (viz. Rs. 2,878 per capita) and Empowered Action Group (EAG) states (including Assam) had the lowest (viz. Rs. 871 per capita) average per capita public expenditure on health in 2015-16 (excluding UTs). The North-Eastern states had the highest public health expenditure as a percentage of Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP) in 2015-16 (2.76 percent). Public health expenditure as a percentage of GSDP stood at 1.36 percent for EAG states (including Assam) and 0.76 percent for major non-EAG states <strong>*13</strong></div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify">&bull; Of the total disease burden in India in 1990, a tenth was caused by a group of risks including unhealthy diet, high blood pressure, high blood sugar, high cholesterol, and overweight, which mainly contribute to ischaemic heart disease, stroke, and diabetes. The contribution of this group of risks increased massively to a quarter of the total disease burden in India in 2016 <strong>*12</strong><br /><br />&bull; The Out-of-Pocket Expenditure (OOPE) on health by households is Rs. 3,02,425 crores (62.6 percent of total health expenditure, 2.4 percent of GDP, Rs. 2,394 per capita) for the year 2014-15. Private Health Insurance expenditure is Rs. 17,755 crores (3.7 percent of total health expenditure) for the year 2014-15 <strong>*11</strong><br /><br />&bull; Based on available evidence, cardiovascular disease (24 percent), chronic respiratory disease (11 percent), cancer (6 percent) and diabetes (2 percent) are the leading cause of mortality in India <strong>*10</strong><br />&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify">&bull; The total number of dengue cases in India has grown from 28,292 in 2010 to 40,425 in 2014. The total number of dengue related deaths stood at 131 in 2014 <strong>*10</strong></div><div style="text-align:justify"><br />&bull; The Proportion (per 1000) of Ailing Persons (PAP), measured as the number of living persons reporting ailments (per 1000 persons), was 89 persons in rural India and 118 persons in urban India <strong>*9</strong><br />&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify">&bull; Private doctors were the most important single source of non-hospitalized treatment in both the sectors (Rural &amp; Urban). More than 70% (72 per cent in the rural areas and 79 per cent in the urban areas) spells of ailment were treated in the private sector (consisting of private doctors, nursing homes, private hospitals, charitable institutions, etc.) <strong>*9</strong></div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify">&bull; It is observed that in rural India, 42 percent hospitalised treatment was carried out in public hospital and rest 58 percent in private hospital. For the urban India, the corresponding figures were 32 percent and 68 percent. It may be noted in this context that households (or persons within households) were segregated in sector (rural/urban) by their place of domicile, and not by the place of treatment <strong>*9</strong></div><p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p><div style="text-align:justify">&bull; Average medical expenditure per hospitalisation case: Higher amount was spent for treatment per hospitalised case by people in the private hospitals (Rs. 25850) than in the public hospitals (Rs. 6120). The highest expenditure was recorded for treatment of Cancer (Rs. 56712) followed by that for Cardio-vascular diseases (Rs. 31647). Average medical expenditure per non-hospitalisation case was Rs. 509 in rural India and Rs. 639 in urban India <strong>*9</strong><br /><br />&bull; As much as 86 percent of rural population and 82 percent of urban population were still not covered under any scheme of health expenditure support. Government, however, was able to bring about 12 percent urban and 13 percent rural population under health protection coverage through Rastriya Swasthya Bima Yojana (RSBY) or similar plan. Only 12 percent households of the 5th quintile class (Usual Monthly Per Capita Consumer Expenditure) of urban area had some arrangement of medical insurance from private provider <strong>*9</strong></div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify">&bull; The draft National Health Policy 2015 proposes a potentially achievable target of raising public health expenditure to 2.5% of the GDP. It also notes that 40% of this would need to come from Central expenditures. At current prices, a target of 2.5% of GDP translates to Rs. 3800 per capita, representing an almost four fold increase in five years <strong>*8</strong><br />&nbsp;<br />&bull; Maternal mortality ratio (MMR)* in India stood at 560 maternal deaths (per 100000 live births) during 1990, 460 during 1995, 370 during 2000, 280 during 2005 and 190 during 2013. India could reduce MMR by 65 percent between 1990 and 2013<strong> *7</strong><br /><br />&bull; At the country level, the two countries that accounted for one third of all global maternal deaths are India at 17 percent (50000) and Nigeria at 14 percent (40000)<strong> *7</strong><br /><br />&bull; U5MR in India declined by 55 percent from 126 in 1990 to 56 in 2012. Infant Mortality Rate declined from 88 in 1990 to 44 in 2012. Neonatal mortality rate declined from 51 in 1990 to 31 in 2012. U5MR in India among boys declined from 121 in 1990 to 54 in 2012. U5MR in India among girls declined from 130 in 1990 to 59 in 2012. The share of neonatal deaths in under-five deaths stood at 55 percent in 2012 as compared to 41 percent in 1990 <strong>*6</strong><br /><br />&bull; Pneumonia is the leading cause of child mortality in India, responsible for the deaths of nearly 400,000 children under five in 2010 <strong>*5</strong><br /><br />&bull; The Indian Commission on Macroeconomics and Health notes that, in India, 13 household person-days per patient were lost per episode of malaria. Furthermore, the commission estimated that the overall monetary losses to families (income losses together with treatment expenses) could amount to between 200 and 400 Indian rupees (US$ 3.5 to 7) <strong>*4</strong><br /><br />&bull; Odisha is one of the most highly malaria-endemic states in India, accounting for 24% of reported cases in 2010 despite consisting of less of than 4% of the national population. Malaria is particularly common among tribal groups which represent 44% of the population of Orissa <strong>*4</strong><br /><br />&bull; Globally 12% of all deaths among adults aged 30 years and over were attributed to tobacco as compared with 16% in India, 17% in Pakistan and 31% in Bangladesh <strong>*3</strong><br /><br />&bull; A recent study illustrated the economic impact of Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs) in India by estimating that if NCDs like: heart disease, cancer, diabetes, chronic respiratory conditions, and other NCDs were &ldquo;eliminated&rdquo;, the country&rsquo;s 2004 GDP would have been 4 to 10 percent greater<strong> *2</strong><br /><br />&bull; The share of out-of-pocket household health expenditures on NCDs in India increased from 32 percent to 47 percent between 1995&ndash;1996 and 2004. Moreover, 40 percent of these expenditures were financed by borrowing and sales of assets, increasing the household&rsquo;s financial vulnerability<strong> *2</strong><br /><br />&bull; In NFHS-III, 62% of women with two daughters and no sons say they want no more children, compared with 47% in NFHS-II<strong> *1</strong></div><div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>15.</strong> 2019 India TB report, released in 2019, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, please <a href="https://tbcindia.gov.in/WriteReadData/India%20TB%20Report%202019.pdf" title="https://tbcindia.gov.in/WriteReadData/India%20TB%20Report%202019.pdf">click here</a> and <a href="https://tbcindia.gov.in/index1.php?lang=1&amp;level=1&amp;sublinkid=4160&amp;lid=2807" title="https://tbcindia.gov.in/index1.php?lang=1&amp;level=1&amp;sublinkid=4160&amp;lid=2807">click here</a> to access</div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>14.</strong> Trends in Maternal Mortality 2000 to 2017: Estimates by World Health Orgnization (WHO), United Nations Children&#39;s Fund (UNICEF), World Bank Group, United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) and the United Nations Population Division (released in September 2019), please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Maternal%20mortality%20Levels%20and%20trends%202000%20to%202017%20Executive%20Summary.pdf" title="Maternal mortality Levels and trends 2000 to 2017 Executive Summary" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Maternal%20mortality%20Levels%20and%20trends%202000%20to%202017%20Executive%20Summary.pdf" title="Maternal mortality Levels and trends 2000 to 2017 Executive Summary">click here</a> and <a href="https://www.unfpa.org/featured-publication/trends-maternal-mortality-2000-2017" title="https://www.unfpa.org/featured-publication/trends-maternal-mortality-2000-2017">click here</a> to access</div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>13</strong>. National Health Profile 2018, 13th Issue, Central Bureau of Health Intelligence, Ministry of Health &amp; Family Welfare, please <a href="https://im4change.org/docs/900National%20Health%20Profile%202018%2013th%20Issue%20Central%20Bureau%20of%20Health%20Intelligence%20Ministry%20of%20Health%20&amp;%20Family%20Welfare.pdf" title="https://im4change.org/docs/900National%20Health%20Profile%202018%2013th%20Issue%20Central%20Bureau%20of%20Health%20Intelligence%20Ministry%20of%20Health%20&amp;%20Family%20Welfare.pdf">click here</a> to access&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>12. </strong>India: Health of the Nation&rsquo;s States - The India State-Level Disease Burden Initiative, Disease Burden Trends in the States of India 1990 to 2016 (released in October, 2017), prepared by Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), Public Health Foundation of India (PHFI), Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) and Ministry of Health &amp; Family Welfare (MoHFW), please <a href="https://im4change.org/docs/11592India_Health_of.pdf" title="https://im4change.org/docs/11592India_Health_of.pdf">click here</a> to access</div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>11</strong>. National Health Accounts: Estimates for India 2014-15 (released in October, 2017), prepared by the National Health Accounts Technical Secretariat, National Health Systems Resource Centre and Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/National%20Health%20Accounts%20Estimates%20Report%202014-15.pdf" title="National Health Accounts Estimates for India 2014-15" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/National%20Health%20Accounts%20Estimates%20Report%202014-15.pdf" title="National Health Accounts Estimates for India 2014-15">click here</a> to access</div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>10</strong>. National Health Profile 2015, Central Bureau of Health Intelligence, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (please <a href="http://www.cbhidghs.nic.in/E-Book%20HTML-2015/index.html" title="http://www.cbhidghs.nic.in/E-Book%20HTML-2015/index.html">click here</a> to access)</div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>9</strong>. 71st round NSS report: Key Indicators of Social Consumption in India-Health (published in June 2015), please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/nss_71st_ki_health_30june15.pdf" title="NSS 71st Round Health" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/nss_71st_ki_health_30june15.pdf" title="NSS 71st Round Health">click here</a> to access the full report; please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/NSS%20Press%20Release%20Health.pdf" title="NSS Press Note Health" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/NSS%20Press%20Release%20Health.pdf" title="NSS Press Note Health">click here</a> to read the summary of findings</div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>8</strong>. Draft National Health Policy 2015 (published in December 2014), Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (Please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Draft%20National%20Health%20Policy%202015.pdf" title="Draft NHP 2015" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Draft%20National%20Health%20Policy%202015.pdf" title="Draft NHP 2015">click here</a> to download)</div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>7</strong>. United Nations&#39; report (released in May, 2014) entitled Trends in maternal mortality estimates 1990 to 2013,&nbsp;</span>(please&nbsp;<a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Trends%20in%20Maternal%20Mortality%201990%20to%202013.pdf" title="Trends in Maternal Mortality 1990 to 2013" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Trends%20in%20Maternal%20Mortality%201990%20to%202013.pdf" title="Trends in Maternal Mortality 1990 to 2013">click here</a>&nbsp;to download)</div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><strong>6. </strong><a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/APR_Progress_Report_2013_9_Sept_2013_1.pdf" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/APR_Progress_Report_2013_9_Sept_2013_1.pdf">Committing to Child Survival</a>: A Promise Renewed Progress Report 2013, UNICEF </span></span></p></div><p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>5</strong>. Pneumonia Progress Report, 2012, released by IVAC and John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012.pdf" title="Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012.pdf" title="Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012">click here</a> to access</span></p><p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p><div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>4</strong>. Defeating malaria in Asia, the Pacific, Americas, Middle East and Europe (2012), World Health Organization and PATH,&nbsp;</span></div><p style="text-align:justify"><a href="http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Defeating%20malaria.pdf" title="http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Defeating%20malaria.pdf">http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Defeat<br />ing%20malaria.pdf</a></p><p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>3</strong>. WHO Global Report: Mortality Attributable to Tobacco (2012), please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/WHO%20report%20on%20Tobacco.pdf" title="WHO " title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/WHO%20report%20on%20Tobacco.pdf" title="WHO ">click here</a> to access&nbsp;&nbsp;</span></p><p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>2</strong>. The Growing Danger of Non-Communicable Diseases: Acting Now to Reverse Course, September, 2011, The World Bank, please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/WBDeepeningCrisis.pdf" title="WBDeepeningCrisis" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/WBDeepeningCrisis.pdf" title="WBDeepeningCrisis">click here</a> to access</span></p><p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>1</strong>. National Family Health Survey III (2005-06), please <a href="http://rchiips.org/NFHS/nfhs3.shtml" title="http://rchiips.org/NFHS/nfhs3.shtml">click here</a> to access &nbsp;</span></p><p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:justify">', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 21, 'title' => 'Public Health', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">KEY TRENDS&nbsp;</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <div style="text-align:justify">&bull; The 2019&nbsp;India&nbsp;TB&nbsp;report&nbsp;says&nbsp;that the&nbsp;country&nbsp;accounted for a quarter of the global tuberculosis (TB) burden with an estimated 27 lakh cases in 2018. In 2018, the country was able to achieve a total notification of 21.5 lakh TB cases, of which 25 percent was from private sector. Majority of the TB burden is among the working age group. Nearly 89 percent of TB cases came from the age group 15-69 years. About 2/3rd of the TB patients were males <strong>*15</strong></div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&bull; Maternal Mortality Ratio for India was 370 in 2000, 286 in 2005, 210 in&nbsp; 2010, 158 in 2015 and 145 in 2017. Therefore, the MMRatio for the country reduced by almost 61 percent between 2000 and 2017. MMRatio for China was 59 in 2000, 44 in 2005, 36 in 2010, 30 in 2015 and 29 in 2017. Therefore, the MMRatio for China fell by around 51 percent between 2000 and 2017 <strong>*14</strong> &nbsp;<br /> &nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&bull; The per capita public expenditure (actual) on health in nominal terms has gone up from Rs. 621 in 2009-10 to Rs. 1,112 in 2015-16. Public expenditure on health (includes health sector expenditure by Centre and States/UTs) as a percentage of GDP was 1.02 percent in 2015-16. There is no significant change in public expenditure on health as a percentage of GDP since 2009-10. The Centre-State share in total public expenditure on health was 31:69 in 2015-16, which used to be 36:64 in 2009-10 <strong>*13</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; The North-Eastern states had the highest (viz. Rs. 2,878 per capita) and Empowered Action Group (EAG) states (including Assam) had the lowest (viz. Rs. 871 per capita) average per capita public expenditure on health in 2015-16 (excluding UTs). The North-Eastern states had the highest public health expenditure as a percentage of Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP) in 2015-16 (2.76 percent). Public health expenditure as a percentage of GSDP stood at 1.36 percent for EAG states (including Assam) and 0.76 percent for major non-EAG states <strong>*13</strong></div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&bull; Of the total disease burden in India in 1990, a tenth was caused by a group of risks including unhealthy diet, high blood pressure, high blood sugar, high cholesterol, and overweight, which mainly contribute to ischaemic heart disease, stroke, and diabetes. The contribution of this group of risks increased massively to a quarter of the total disease burden in India in 2016 <strong>*12</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; The Out-of-Pocket Expenditure (OOPE) on health by households is Rs. 3,02,425 crores (62.6 percent of total health expenditure, 2.4 percent of GDP, Rs. 2,394 per capita) for the year 2014-15. Private Health Insurance expenditure is Rs. 17,755 crores (3.7 percent of total health expenditure) for the year 2014-15 <strong>*11</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; Based on available evidence, cardiovascular disease (24 percent), chronic respiratory disease (11 percent), cancer (6 percent) and diabetes (2 percent) are the leading cause of mortality in India <strong>*10</strong><br /> &nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&bull; The total number of dengue cases in India has grown from 28,292 in 2010 to 40,425 in 2014. The total number of dengue related deaths stood at 131 in 2014 <strong>*10</strong></div> <div style="text-align:justify"><br /> &bull; The Proportion (per 1000) of Ailing Persons (PAP), measured as the number of living persons reporting ailments (per 1000 persons), was 89 persons in rural India and 118 persons in urban India <strong>*9</strong><br /> &nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&bull; Private doctors were the most important single source of non-hospitalized treatment in both the sectors (Rural &amp; Urban). More than 70% (72 per cent in the rural areas and 79 per cent in the urban areas) spells of ailment were treated in the private sector (consisting of private doctors, nursing homes, private hospitals, charitable institutions, etc.) <strong>*9</strong></div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&bull; It is observed that in rural India, 42 percent hospitalised treatment was carried out in public hospital and rest 58 percent in private hospital. For the urban India, the corresponding figures were 32 percent and 68 percent. It may be noted in this context that households (or persons within households) were segregated in sector (rural/urban) by their place of domicile, and not by the place of treatment <strong>*9</strong></div> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <div style="text-align:justify">&bull; Average medical expenditure per hospitalisation case: Higher amount was spent for treatment per hospitalised case by people in the private hospitals (Rs. 25850) than in the public hospitals (Rs. 6120). The highest expenditure was recorded for treatment of Cancer (Rs. 56712) followed by that for Cardio-vascular diseases (Rs. 31647). Average medical expenditure per non-hospitalisation case was Rs. 509 in rural India and Rs. 639 in urban India <strong>*9</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; As much as 86 percent of rural population and 82 percent of urban population were still not covered under any scheme of health expenditure support. Government, however, was able to bring about 12 percent urban and 13 percent rural population under health protection coverage through Rastriya Swasthya Bima Yojana (RSBY) or similar plan. Only 12 percent households of the 5th quintile class (Usual Monthly Per Capita Consumer Expenditure) of urban area had some arrangement of medical insurance from private provider <strong>*9</strong></div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&bull; The draft National Health Policy 2015 proposes a potentially achievable target of raising public health expenditure to 2.5% of the GDP. It also notes that 40% of this would need to come from Central expenditures. At current prices, a target of 2.5% of GDP translates to Rs. 3800 per capita, representing an almost four fold increase in five years <strong>*8</strong><br /> &nbsp;<br /> &bull; Maternal mortality ratio (MMR)* in India stood at 560 maternal deaths (per 100000 live births) during 1990, 460 during 1995, 370 during 2000, 280 during 2005 and 190 during 2013. India could reduce MMR by 65 percent between 1990 and 2013<strong> *7</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; At the country level, the two countries that accounted for one third of all global maternal deaths are India at 17 percent (50000) and Nigeria at 14 percent (40000)<strong> *7</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; U5MR in India declined by 55 percent from 126 in 1990 to 56 in 2012. Infant Mortality Rate declined from 88 in 1990 to 44 in 2012. Neonatal mortality rate declined from 51 in 1990 to 31 in 2012. U5MR in India among boys declined from 121 in 1990 to 54 in 2012. U5MR in India among girls declined from 130 in 1990 to 59 in 2012. The share of neonatal deaths in under-five deaths stood at 55 percent in 2012 as compared to 41 percent in 1990 <strong>*6</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; Pneumonia is the leading cause of child mortality in India, responsible for the deaths of nearly 400,000 children under five in 2010 <strong>*5</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; The Indian Commission on Macroeconomics and Health notes that, in India, 13 household person-days per patient were lost per episode of malaria. Furthermore, the commission estimated that the overall monetary losses to families (income losses together with treatment expenses) could amount to between 200 and 400 Indian rupees (US$ 3.5 to 7) <strong>*4</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; Odisha is one of the most highly malaria-endemic states in India, accounting for 24% of reported cases in 2010 despite consisting of less of than 4% of the national population. Malaria is particularly common among tribal groups which represent 44% of the population of Orissa <strong>*4</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; Globally 12% of all deaths among adults aged 30 years and over were attributed to tobacco as compared with 16% in India, 17% in Pakistan and 31% in Bangladesh <strong>*3</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; A recent study illustrated the economic impact of Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs) in India by estimating that if NCDs like: heart disease, cancer, diabetes, chronic respiratory conditions, and other NCDs were &ldquo;eliminated&rdquo;, the country&rsquo;s 2004 GDP would have been 4 to 10 percent greater<strong> *2</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; The share of out-of-pocket household health expenditures on NCDs in India increased from 32 percent to 47 percent between 1995&ndash;1996 and 2004. Moreover, 40 percent of these expenditures were financed by borrowing and sales of assets, increasing the household&rsquo;s financial vulnerability<strong> *2</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; In NFHS-III, 62% of women with two daughters and no sons say they want no more children, compared with 47% in NFHS-II<strong> *1</strong></div> <div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify"><strong>15.</strong> 2019 India TB report, released in 2019, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, please <a href="https://tbcindia.gov.in/WriteReadData/India%20TB%20Report%202019.pdf">click here</a> and <a href="https://tbcindia.gov.in/index1.php?lang=1&amp;level=1&amp;sublinkid=4160&amp;lid=2807">click here</a> to access</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify"><strong>14.</strong> Trends in Maternal Mortality 2000 to 2017: Estimates by World Health Orgnization (WHO), United Nations Children&#39;s Fund (UNICEF), World Bank Group, United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) and the United Nations Population Division (released in September 2019), please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Maternal%20mortality%20Levels%20and%20trends%202000%20to%202017%20Executive%20Summary.pdf" title="Maternal mortality Levels and trends 2000 to 2017 Executive Summary">click here</a> and <a href="https://www.unfpa.org/featured-publication/trends-maternal-mortality-2000-2017">click here</a> to access</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify"><strong>13</strong>. National Health Profile 2018, 13th Issue, Central Bureau of Health Intelligence, Ministry of Health &amp; Family Welfare, please <a href="https://im4change.org/docs/900National%20Health%20Profile%202018%2013th%20Issue%20Central%20Bureau%20of%20Health%20Intelligence%20Ministry%20of%20Health%20&amp;%20Family%20Welfare.pdf">click here</a> to access&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify"><strong>12. </strong>India: Health of the Nation&rsquo;s States - The India State-Level Disease Burden Initiative, Disease Burden Trends in the States of India 1990 to 2016 (released in October, 2017), prepared by Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), Public Health Foundation of India (PHFI), Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) and Ministry of Health &amp; Family Welfare (MoHFW), please <a href="https://im4change.org/docs/11592India_Health_of.pdf">click here</a> to access</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify"><strong>11</strong>. National Health Accounts: Estimates for India 2014-15 (released in October, 2017), prepared by the National Health Accounts Technical Secretariat, National Health Systems Resource Centre and Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/National%20Health%20Accounts%20Estimates%20Report%202014-15.pdf" title="National Health Accounts Estimates for India 2014-15">click here</a> to access</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify"><strong>10</strong>. National Health Profile 2015, Central Bureau of Health Intelligence, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (please <a href="http://www.cbhidghs.nic.in/E-Book%20HTML-2015/index.html">click here</a> to access)</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify"><strong>9</strong>. 71st round NSS report: Key Indicators of Social Consumption in India-Health (published in June 2015), please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/nss_71st_ki_health_30june15.pdf" title="NSS 71st Round Health">click here</a> to access the full report; please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/NSS%20Press%20Release%20Health.pdf" title="NSS Press Note Health">click here</a> to read the summary of findings</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify"><strong>8</strong>. Draft National Health Policy 2015 (published in December 2014), Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (Please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Draft%20National%20Health%20Policy%202015.pdf" title="Draft NHP 2015">click here</a> to download)</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>7</strong>. United Nations&#39; report (released in May, 2014) entitled Trends in maternal mortality estimates 1990 to 2013,&nbsp;</span>(please&nbsp;<a href="tinymce/uploaded/Trends%20in%20Maternal%20Mortality%201990%20to%202013.pdf" title="Trends in Maternal Mortality 1990 to 2013">click here</a>&nbsp;to download)</div> <div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><strong>6. </strong><a href="tinymce/uploaded/APR_Progress_Report_2013_9_Sept_2013_1.pdf">Committing to Child Survival</a>: A Promise Renewed Progress Report 2013, UNICEF </span></span></p> </div> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>5</strong>. Pneumonia Progress Report, 2012, released by IVAC and John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012.pdf" title="Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012">click here</a> to access</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>4</strong>. Defeating malaria in Asia, the Pacific, Americas, Middle East and Europe (2012), World Health Organization and PATH,&nbsp;</span></div> <p style="text-align:justify"><a href="http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Defeating%20malaria.pdf">http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Defeating%20malaria.pdf</a></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>3</strong>. WHO Global Report: Mortality Attributable to Tobacco (2012), please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/WHO%20report%20on%20Tobacco.pdf" title="WHO ">click here</a> to access&nbsp;&nbsp;</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>2</strong>. The Growing Danger of Non-Communicable Diseases: Acting Now to Reverse Course, September, 2011, The World Bank, please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/WBDeepeningCrisis.pdf" title="WBDeepeningCrisis">click here</a> to access</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>1</strong>. National Family Health Survey III (2005-06), please <a href="http://rchiips.org/NFHS/nfhs3.shtml">click here</a> to access &nbsp;</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The key findings of the [inside]Global Tuberculosis Report 2022 (released in October 2022)[/inside] by World Health Organization are as follows (please click <a href="/upload/files/Global%20Tuberculosis%20Report%202022.pdf">here</a> and <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022">here</a> to access):&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>India-specific findings</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The case notifications of people newly diagnosed with TB in India were 16,67,136 in 2015, 17,63,876 in 2016, 16,49,694 in 2017, 19,08,683 in 2018, 21,62,323 in 2019, 16,29,301 in 2020, and 19,65,444 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/covid-19-and-tb">click here</a> to access the data. &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Between 2019 and 2020, India witnessed a reduction of 24.65 percent in case notifications of people newly diagnosed with TB. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/covid-19-and-tb ">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Between 2019 and 2021, India faced a reduction of 9.1 percent in case notifications of people newly diagnosed with TB. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/covid-19-and-tb ">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Almost all (90 percent) of the global drop in the number of people newly diagnosed with TB and reported (notified) between 2019 and 2020 was accounted for by 10 countries; the top three, India, Indonesia and the Philippines, accounted for 67 percent. In 2021, 90 percent of the reduction compared with 2019 was accounted for by only five countries. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/covid-19-and-tb ">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Among the 30 high TB burden and 3 global TB watchlist countries, the largest relative reductions in annual notifications between 2019 and 2020 were (ordered according to the size of the relative reduction) in Philippines, Lesotho, Indonesia, Zimbabwe, India, Myanmar and Bangladesh (all &gt;20 percent). In 2021, there was considerable recovery in India, Indonesia and the Philippines, although not to 2019 levels. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/covid-19-and-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2021, eight countries accounted for more than two thirds of global TB cases: India (28 percent), Indonesia (9.2 percent), China (7.4 percent), the Philippines (7.0 percent), Pakistan (5.8 percent), Nigeria (4.4 percent), Bangladesh (3.6 percent) and Democratic Republic of the Congo (2.9 percent). Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-1-tb-incidence">click here</a> to access data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Trends in the TB incidence rate in the 30 high TB burden countries are mixed. Between 2020 and 2021, there were estimated increases in countries with major shortfalls in TB notifications in 2020 and 2021 (e.g. India, Indonesia, Myanmar, Philippines), while in others the previous decline in the TB incidence rate has slowed or stabilized. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-1-tb-incidence">click here</a> to access data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; TB incidence rates for India were 341 per lakh population in 2000, 340 per lakh population in 2001, 339 per lakh population in 2002, 337 per lakh population in 2003, 334 per lakh population in 2004, 329 per lakh population in 2005, 323 per lakh population in 2006, 316 per lakh population in 2007, 309 per lakh population in 2008, 300 per lakh population in 2009, 292 per lakh population in 2010, 284 per lakh population in 2011, 277 per lakh population in 2012, 270 per lakh population in 2013, 263 per lakh population in 2014, 256 per lakh population in 2015, 249 per lakh population in 2016, 234 per lakh population in 2017, 224 per lakh population in 2018, 214 per lakh population in 2019, 204 per lakh population in 2020, and 210 per lakh population in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-1-tb-incidence">click here</a> to access data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; TB case notification rates (of new and relapse cases) for India were 105 per lakh population in 2000, 101 per lakh population in 2001, 97 per lakh population in 2002, 96 per lakh population in 2003, 100 per lakh population in 2004, 100 per lakh population in 2005, 105 per lakh population in 2006, 109 per lakh population in 2007, 110 per lakh population in 2008, 110 per lakh population in 2009, 108 per lakh population in 2010, 105 per lakh population in 2011, 101 per lakh population in 2012, 96 per lakh population in 2013, 123 per lakh population in 2014, 126 per lakh population in 2015, 132 per lakh population in 2016, 122 per lakh population in 2017, 139 per lakh population in 2018, 156 per lakh population in 2019, 117 per lakh population in 2020, and 140 per lakh population in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-1-tb-incidence">click here</a> to access data. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2021, 82 percent of global TB deaths among HIV-negative people occurred in the WHO African and South-East Asia regions; India alone accounted for 36 percent. The African and South-East Asia regions accounted for 82 percent of the combined total of TB deaths in HIV-negative and HIV-positive people; India accounted for 32 percent. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-2-tb-mortality">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Trends in the number of TB deaths in the 30 high TB burden countries are mixed. Between 2019 and 2021, striking increases are estimated to have occurred in countries with major shortfalls in TB notifications in 2020 and 2021 (e.g. India, Indonesia, Myanmar, Philippines), while in others previous declines have slowed or stabilized. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-2-tb-mortality">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The estimated absolute numbers of TB deaths (HIV-positive and HIV-negative) in India were 7,10,000 in 2000, 7,00,000 in 2001, 6,90,000 in 2002, 6,70,000 in 2003, 6,50,000 in 2004, 6,40,000 in 2005, 6,30,000 in 2006, 6,30,000 in 2007, 5,90,000 in 2008, 5,80,000 in 2009, 5,50,000 in 2010, 5,40,000 in 2011, 5,30,000 in 2012, 5,20,000 in 2013, 4,90,000 in 2014, 4,70,000 in 2015, 4,60,000 in 2016, 4,60,000 in 2017, 4,60,000 in 2018, 4,50,000 in 2019, 4,80,000 in 2020, and 5,10,000 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-2-tb-mortality">click here</a> to access the data.<br /> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<br /> &bull; The estimated numbers of incident cases of Multidrug- and rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/RR-TB) were 1,49,000 in 2015, 1,44,000 in 2016, 1,35,000 in 2017, 129,000 in 2018, 123,000 in 2019, 1,17,000 in 2020, and 1,19,000 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-3-drug-resistant-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The countries with the largest share of incident cases of MDR/RR-TB in 2021 were India (26 percent of global cases), the Russian Federation (8.5 percent of global cases) and Pakistan (7.9 percent of global cases). Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-3-drug-resistant-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2019&ndash;2021, the first-ever national survey was completed in India; this was one of the largest surveys to date, with a sample size of about 3,20,000 people. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2.4-tb-prevalence-surveys">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2020, the first full year of the COVID-19 pandemic, there were particularly large absolute and relative reductions in India, Indonesia and Philippines, followed by some recovery in 2021.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The number&nbsp;of notifications of people newly diagnosed with TB (new and relapse cases, all forms) was 11,15,718 in 2000, 10,85,075 in 2001, 10,60,951 in 2002, 10,73,282 in 2003, 11,36,182 in 2004, 11,56,248 in 2005, 12,28,827 in 2006, 12,95,943 in 2007, 13,32,267 in 2008, 13,51,913 in 2009, 13,39,866 in 2010, 13,23,949 in 2011, 12,89,836 in 2012, 12,43,905 in 2013, 16,09,547 in 2014, 16,67,136 in 2015, 17,63,876 in 2016, 16,49,694 in 2017, 19,08,683 in 2018, 21,62,323 in 2019, 16,29,301 in 2020, and 19,65,444 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-1-case-notifications ">click here</a> to access the data. &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The number of estimated TB incident cases in India was 36,10,000 in 2000, 36,70,000 in 2001, 37,20,000 in 2002, 37,60,000 in 2003, 37,90,000 in 2004, 38,00,000 in 2005, 37,90,000 in 2006, 37,60,000 in 2007, 37,20,000 in 2008, 36,80,000 in 2009, 36,30,000 in 2010, 35,70,000 in 2011, 35,30,000 in 2012, 34,80,000 in 2013, 34,40,000 in 2014, 33,90,000 in 2015, 33,30,000 in 2016, 31,60,000 in 2017, 30,60,000 in 2018, 29,60,000 in 2019, 28,50,000 in 2020, and 29,50,000 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-1-case-notifications ">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The contribution of public-private mix (PPM) initiatives to total notifications was 2.3 percent in 2010, 0.26 percent in 2011, 0.24 percent in 2012, 6.0 percent in 2013, 12.0 percent in 2014, 11.0 percent in 2015, 17.0 percent in 2016, 23.0 percent in 2017, 26.0 percent in 2018, 28.0 percent in 2019, 31.0 percent in 2020, and 33.0 percent in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-1-case-notifications ">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The percentage of people in India newly diagnosed with pulmonary TB who were bacteriologically confirmed was 35 percent in 2000, 41 percent in 2001, 44 percent in 2002, 49 percent in 2003, 53 percent in 2004, 56 percent in 2005, 58 percent in 2006, 60 percent in 2007, 61 percent in 2008, 62 percent in 2009, 63 percent in 2010, 65 percent in 2011, 66 percent in 2012, 71 percent in 2013, 66 percent in 2014, 64 percent in 2015, 63 percent in 2016, 71 percent in 2017, 57 percent in 2018, 57 percent in 2019, 54 percent in 2020, and 66 percent in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-2-diagnostic-testing-for-tb--hiv-associated-tb-and-drug-resistant-tb">click here</a> to access the data</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The number of WHO-recommended rapid tests used per 1,00,000 population in the case of India was 258 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-2-diagnostic-testing-for-tb--hiv-associated-tb-and-drug-resistant-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The percentage of people in India initially tested for TB with a WHO-recommended rapid test who had a positive test was 24 percent in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-2-diagnostic-testing-for-tb--hiv-associated-tb-and-drug-resistant-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The number of WHO-recommended rapid diagnostic tests per person notified as a TB case (new and relapse cases, all forms) in India was 1.8 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-2-diagnostic-testing-for-tb--hiv-associated-tb-and-drug-resistant-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The estimated TB treatment coverage for India was 67 percent in 2021. The estimated TB treatment coverage among children aged 0&ndash;14 years for India was 32 percent in 2021. The estimated TB treatment coverage among children aged &gt;= 15 years for India was 71 percent in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-3-tb-treatment-and-treatment-coverage">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2021, ten countries accounted for 75 percent of the global gap between the estimated number of people who developed TB (incident TB cases) and the number of people who were detected with TB and officially reported. About 60 percent of the global gap was accounted for by five countries: India (24 percent), Indonesia (13 percent), the Philippines (10 percent), Pakistan (6.6 percent) and Nigeria (6.3 percent). Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-3-tb-treatment-and-treatment-coverage">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The estimated coverage of antiretroviral therapy for people living with HIV who developed TB for India 59 percent in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-3-tb-treatment-and-treatment-coverage">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The number of Indian people diagnosed with MDR/RR-TB was 3,288 in 2010, 4,297 in 2011, 17,253 in 2012, 18,888 in 2013, 25,748 in 2014, 28,876 in 2015, 37,258 in 2016, 39,009 in 2017, 58,347 in 2018, 66,255 in 2019, 49,679 in 2020, and 58,837 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-4-drug-resistant-tb-treatment">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The number of Indian people enrolled on MDR/RR-TB was 2,182 in 2010, 3,378 in 2011, 14,117 in 2012, 21,093 in 2013, 24,073 in 2014, 26,966 in 2015, 32,914 in 2016, 35,950 in 2017, 47,284 in 2018, 60,858 in 2019, 42,505 in 2020, and 53,037 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-4-drug-resistant-tb-treatment">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The number of Indian people enrolled on MDR/RR-TB was 2,182 in 2010, 3,378 in 2011, 14,117 in 2012, 21,093 in 2013, 24,073 in 2014, 26,966 in 2015, 32,914 in 2016, 35,950 in 2017, 47,284 in 2018, 60,858 in 2019, 42,505 in 2020, and 53,037 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-4-drug-resistant-tb-treatment">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The WHO regions with the best treatment coverage are the European Region and the Region of the Americas. Among the 30 high MDR/RR-TB burden countries, those with the best treatment coverage are 2021: Peru, the Russian Federation, Azerbaijan, the Republic of Moldova, India and Kazakhstan. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-4-drug-resistant-tb-treatment">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The estimated treatment coverage for MDR/RR-TB for India was 45 percent in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-4-drug-resistant-tb-treatment">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Seven countries (India, Nigeria, South Africa, Uganda, United Republic of Tanzania, Zambia and Zimbabwe) each reported initiating over 200 000 people with HIV on TB preventive treatment in 2021, accounting collectively for 82 percent of the 2.8 million reported globally. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-prevention">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Since 2014, spending on the diagnosis and treatment of drug-susceptible TB has fallen slightly. Spending on treatment of multidrug and rifampicin-resistant TB (MDR/RR-TB) has increased steadily since 2010: this growth is largely explained by trends in the BRICS group of countries (i.e., Brazil, Russian Federation, India, China and South Africa). Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/financing-for-tb">click here</a> to access the data. &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Bangladesh, Cambodia, China and Zambia are examples of high TB burden countries that have steadily increased domestic funding specifically allocated to NTPs (as opposed to funding allocated more generally for inpatient and outpatient care, including for people with TB) in recent years. There was a considerable reduction in domestic spending in India between 2020 and 2021; one explanation for this was less need for spending on second-line anti-TB drugs in 2021, given stocks that still existed from 2020. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/financing-for-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The international funding (at constant 2021 US$) for national TB programmes on TB prevention, diagnostic and treatment services was 37 million in 2010, 65 million in 2011, 61 million in 2012, 143 million in 2013, 92 million in 2014, 142 million in 2015, 135 million in 2016, 187 million in 2017, 170 million in 2018, 91 million in 2019, 85 million in 2020, and 154 million in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/financing-for-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The domestic funding (at constant 2021 US$) for national TB programmes on TB prevention, diagnostic and treatment services was 56 million in 2010, 60 million in 2011, 44 million in 2012, 85 million in 2013, 162 million in 2014, 132 million in 2015, 139 million in 2016, 305 million in 2017, 348 million in 2018, 365 million in 2019, 326 million in 2020, and 183 million in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/financing-for-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In the case of India, the sources of funding and funding gaps reported for the TB-specific budgets included in national strategic plans for TB were domestic funding: 66 percent, Global Fund: 29 percent, and international funding (excluding Global Fund): 4.9 percent in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/financing-for-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The distribution of the two UHC indicators in the 30 high TB burden countries and three global TB watchlist countries shows that, in general, values improve with income level; this is especially evident for the SCI. Nonetheless, the risk of catastrophic health expenditures is high (15 or above) in several middle-income countries, including Angola, Bangladesh, Cambodia, China, India, and Nigeria. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/uhc-tb-determinants/6.1-universal-health-coverage">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; To achieve Universal Health Coverage (UHC), substantial increases in investment in health are critical. From 2000 to 2019 there was a striking increase in health expenditure (from all sources) per capita in a few high TB burden countries, especially the upper-middle-income countries of Brazil, China, South Africa and Thailand. A steady upward trend was evident in Bangladesh, Ethiopia, India, Indonesia, Lesotho, Mongolia, Mozambique, the Philippines and Viet Nam, and there was a noticeable rise from 2012 to 2017 in Myanmar. Elsewhere, however, levels of spending have been relatively stable, and at generally much lower levels. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/uhc-tb-determinants/6.1-universal-health-coverage">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The current health expenditures per capita were US$ 86 in 2000, US$ 96 in 2001, US$ 99 in 2002, US$ 101 in 2003, US$ 109 in 2004, US$ 114 in 2005, US$ 119 in 2006, US$ 126 in 2007, US$ 131 in 2008, US$ 139 in 2009, US$ 141 in 2010, US$ 146 in 2011, US$ 162 in 2012, US$ 190 in 2013, US$ 189 in 2014, US$ 197 in 2015, US$ 205 in 2016, US$ 182 in 2017, US$ 196 in 2018, and US$ 211 in 2019.&nbsp;Kindly <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/uhc-tb-determinants/6.1-universal-health-coverage">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The estimated number of TB cases attributable to alcohol use disorders was 2,58,000, diabetes was 1,05,000, HIV was 93,000, smoking was 1,10,000 and undernourishment was 7,38,000 in 2021. Kindly <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/uhc-tb-determinants/6-3-tb-determinants">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Based on the latest available data in the World Bank database, some upper-middle-income and lower-middle-income countries (e.g. Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, Mongolia, South Africa, Thailand, and Viet Nam) appear to be performing relatively well. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/uhc-tb-determinants/6-3-tb-determinants">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Three new antigen-based skin tests for TB infection that perform better than tuberculin skin tests (particularly in terms of specificity) were evaluated and recommended by WHO in 2022; these are the Cy-Tb skin test, Serum Institute of India, India; C-TST, Anhui Zhifei Longcom Biopharmaceutical Co. Ltd, China; and Diaskintest, JSC Generium, Russian Federation. WHO plans to evaluate the following tests in the coming year: culture-free, targeted-sequencing solutions to test for drug resistance directly from sputum specimens; broth microdilution methods for drug-susceptibility testing (DST); and new IGRAs to test for TB infection. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-research-and-innovation">click here</a> to access the information.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In India, the Ministry of Health &amp; Family Welfare launched the 21-day TB Mukt Bharat Campaign at Ayushman Bharat Health and Wellness Centres (AB-HWCs), from 24 March to 14 April 2022. The campaign aimed to meaningfully engage community and civil society to build a people&rsquo;s movement to end TB. It was celebrated across 75 228 AB-HWCs; a total of 6 801 956 people were screened for TB, and 38 328 community awareness activities took place using 21 479 trained TB champions. Linked to this initiative, primary health care teams led by the newly introduced cadre of community health officers (CHOs) provide people-centred TB services to people&rsquo;s doorsteps. AB-HWCs are playing an important role in improving awareness, identifying TB symptoms at an early stage, offering treatment adherence and psychosocial support to individuals and families with TB, and creating a strong network of TB survivors to strengthen the TB response. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/featured-topics/civil-society-engagement">click here</a> to access the more information.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; WHO has been advancing MAF-TB efforts to strengthen the engagement of the private sector and other public care providers not linked to national TB programmes (NTPs) through a new initiative with the Bill &amp; Melinda Gates Foundation. The initiative promotes the development of enhanced PPM data dashboards in seven priority countries: Bangladesh, India, Indonesia, Kenya, Nigeria, Pakistan and the Philippines. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/featured-topics/maf-tb">click here</a> to get more information.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; India has developed a national multisectoral action framework for TB; this strategic document makes a strong case for transforming India&rsquo;s TB elimination efforts from a health sector struggle to a whole-of-society responsibility. The framework is a guide for policy-makers and a call to action for communities, civil society, the private sector, and other partners and stakeholders. The overarching goal is to strengthen the country&rsquo;s capacity for a multisectoral response that facilitates TB elimination by 2025, with the key objective being to achieve policy convergence and adopt a health-in-all approach. The framework highlights the six key strategic areas for integrated action: integrated health care service delivery; TB-free workplaces; socioeconomic support for patients; awareness generation and infection control; corporate social responsibility and investment in TB; and targeted intervention for key affected populations. It defines the list of government ministries and other stakeholders, and the strategic scope of collaboration with each of them. Also, the framework acknowledges the importance of resources for defined strategic areas (e.g. financing, capacity-building, technical resources and research), and calls on partners and governments to mobilize resources for its implementation. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/featured-topics/maf-tb">click here</a> to get more information.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The key findings of the report titled [inside]Rural Health Statistics 2020-21 (released in May 2022)[/inside], which has been prepared by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, are as follows (please <a href="/upload/files/Rural%20Health%20Statistics%202020-21.pdf">click here</a> to access):</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; As on 31st March, 2021, there were 1,56,101 and 1,718 Sub Centres (SCs), 25,140 and 5,439 Primary Health Centres (PHCs), and 5,481 and 470 Community Health Centres (CHCs), respectively, which were functioning in rural and urban areas of the country.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average rural population covered by a Sub Centre was 5,734 as on 1st July, 2021, whereas the norm is that one Sub Centre should be serving a population of size in the range 300-5,000.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average population in tribal/ hilly/ desert areas covered by a Sub Centre was 3,839 as on 1st July, 2021, whereas the norm is that one Sub Centre should be serving a population of size up to 3,000 in such areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; A Sub Centre is the most peripheral and first contact point between the primary health care system and the community. Sub Centres are assigned tasks relating to interpersonal communication in order to bring about behavioral change and provide services in relation to maternal and child health, family welfare, nutrition, immunisation, diarrhoea control and control of communicable diseases programmes. Each Sub Centre is required to be manned by at least one auxiliary nurse midwife (ANM) / female health worker and one male health worker. Under the National Rural Health Mission (NRHM), there is a provision for one additional second ANM on contract basis. One lady health visitor (LHV) is entrusted with the task of supervision of six Sub Centres. The Government of India bears the salary of ANM and LHV while the salary of the Male Health Worker is borne by the state governments.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average rural population covered by a Primary Health Centre (PHC) was 35,602 as on 1st July, 2021, whereas the norm is that one PHC should be serving a population of size in the range 20,000-30,000.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average population in tribal/ hilly/ desert areas covered by a PHC was 25,507 as on 1st July, 2021, whereas the norm is that one PHC should be serving a population of size up to 20,000 in such areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; PHC is the first contact point between the village community and the medical officer. The PHCs were envisaged to provide an integrated curative and preventive health care to the rural population with emphasis on preventive and promotive aspects of health care. The PHCs are established and maintained by the state governments under the Minimum Needs Programme (MNP)/ Basic Minimum Services (BMS) Programme. As per minimum requirement, a PHC is to be manned by a medical officer supported by 14 paramedical and other staff. Under NRHM, there is a provision for two additional staff nurses at PHCs on contract basis. It acts as a referral unit for 6 Sub Centres and has 4-6 beds for patients. The activities of PHC involve curative, preventive, promotive and family welfare services.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average rural population covered by a Community Health Centre (CHC) was 1,63,298 as on 1st July, 2021, whereas the norm is that one CHC should be serving a population of size in the range 80,000-1,20,000.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average population in tribal/ hilly/ desert areas covered by a CHC was 1,03,756 as on 1st July, 2021, whereas the norm is that one CHC should be serving a population of size up to 80,000 in such areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; CHCs are being established and maintained by the state government under Minimum Needs Program (MNP)/Basic Minimum Services (BMS) programme. As per minimum norms, a CHC is required to be manned by four medical specialists i.e. surgeon, physician, gynecologist and pediatrician supported by 21 paramedical and other staff. It has 30 indoor beds with one OT, X-ray, labour room and laboratory facilities. It serves as a referral centre for 4 PHCs and also provides facilities for obstetric care and specialist consultations.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Rural Health Care System in India</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Out of the sanctioned posts, a significant percentage of posts were vacant at all the levels. Nearly 21.1 percent of the sanctioned posts of Health Worker (Female)/ Auxiliary Nurse Midwife-ANM (at SCs and PHCs) were vacant as compared to 41.9 percent vacancies of Health Worker (Male) in 2021 at SCs. At PHCs, 64.2 percent of the sanctioned posts of Health Assistant (Male and Female) and 21.8 percent of the sanctioned posts of Doctors were vacant in 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The availability of manpower is one of the important prerequisites for the efficient functioning of the Rural Health services. As on 31st March, 2021, the overall shortfall (which excludes the existing surplus in some of the states) in the posts of Health Worker (Female) / ANM was 2.9 percent of the total requirement as per the norm of one HW(F)/ ANM per Sub Centre and PHC. The overall shortfall was mainly due to shortfall in states of Uttar Pradesh (1,871), Himachal Pradesh (1,253), Gujarat (616), Odisha (397), Tripura (380), and Uttarakhand (252).&nbsp;Similarly, in case of Health Worker (Male), there was a shortfall of 66.1 percent of the requirement. There was a vacancy of 21.1 percent for HW (Female)/ ANM (at SCs and PHCs) as compared to the sanctioned posts. There was a vacancy of 41.9 percent for Health Worker (Male) as compared to the sanctioned posts in 2021 at SCs. At PHCs, 64.2 percent of the sanctioned posts of Health Assistant (Male and Female) and 21.8 percent of the sanctioned posts of Doctors were vacant in 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; PHC is the first contact point between the village community and the Medical Officer. Manpower in PHC includes a Medical Officer supported by paramedical and other staff. In the case of PHC, for Health Assistant (male + female), the shortfall was 72.2 percent. For allopathic doctors at PHC, there was a shortfall of 4.3 percent of the total requirement at the national level. This happened due to a significant shortfall of doctors at PHCs in the states of Odisha (362), Karnataka (340), and Chhattisgarh (271).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The Community Health Centres provide specialised medical care of Surgeons, Obstetricians &amp; Gynecologists, Physicians and Pediatricians. The position of specialists manpower at CHCs as on 31st March, 2021 shows that out of the sanctioned posts, 72.3 percent of Surgeons, 64.2 percent of Obstetricians &amp; Gynecologists, 69.2 percent of physicians, and 67.1 percent of pediatricians were vacant. Overall 68 percent of the sanctioned posts of specialists at CHCs were vacant in rural areas. Moreover, as compared to requirements for existing infrastructure, there was a shortfall of 83.2 percent of Surgeons, 74.2 percent of Obstetricians &amp; Gynecologists, 82.2 percent of Physicians, and 80.6 percent of Pediatricians. Overall, there was a shortfall of 79.9 percent of specialists at the CHCs as compared to the requirement for existing CHCs. The shortfall of specialists was significantly high in most of the states. However, in addition to the specialists, about 17,012 General Duty Medical Officers (GDMOs) Allopathic and 514 AYUSH Specialists along with 2,955 GDMO AYUSH were also available at CHCs as on 31st March, 2021. In addition to this, there were 805 Anaesthetists and 289 Eye Surgeons available at CHCs as on 31st March, 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Comparison of the manpower position of major categories in 2021 with that in 2020 shows an overall increase in the number of ANMs at SCs &amp; PHCs and Doctors at PHCs during the period. However, there was a marginal decrease in the number of Specialists at CHCs. There was an increase of ANMs at SCs &amp; PHCs from 2,12,593 in 2020 to 2,14,820 in 2021 and Doctors at PHCs from 28,516 in 2020 to 31,716 in 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Considering the status of paramedical staff, there was an increase of Lab Technicians from 19,903 in 2020 to 22,723 in 2021 at PHCs and CHCs. There was an increase in the number of pharmacists from 25,792 in 2020 to 28,537 in 2021. A significant increase was also observed for nursing staff under PHC &amp; CHCs from 71,847 in 2020 to 79,044 in 2021. The number of radiographers decreased from 2,434 in 2020 to 2,418 in 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; A total of 1,224 Sub Divisional/ Sub District Hospitals were functioning as on 31st March, 2021 throughout the country. In these hospitals, 15,274 doctors were available. In addition to these doctors, nearly 42,073 paramedical staffs were also available at those hospitals as on 31st March, 2021. The number of doctors in Sub Divisional/ Sub District Hospitals increased from 13,399 in 2020 to 15,274 in 2021. The number of paramedical staff in Sub Divisional/ Sub District Hospitals also went up from 29,937 in 2020 to 42,073 in 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In addition to the above, 764 District Hospitals (DHs) were also functioning as on 31st March, 2021 throughout the country. There were 26,929 doctors available in the DHs. In addition to the doctors, roughly 90,435 paramedical staff were also available at District Hospitals as on 31st March, 2021. The number of doctors in District Hospitals went up from 22,827 in 2020 to 26,929 in 2021. The number of paramedical staff in District Hospitals increased from 80,920 in 2020 to 90,435 in 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The key findings of the report titled [inside]India TB Report 2022: Coming Together to End TB Altogether (released in March 2022)[/inside], which has been produced by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, are as follows (please <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/TB%20Annual%20Report%202022.pdf">click here</a> to access):&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; As per the Global TB Report 2021, the estimated incidence of all forms of TB in India for the year 2020 was 188 per 100,000 population (129-257 per 100,000 population).&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The total number of incident tuberculosis i.e., TB patients (new and relapse) notified during 2021 was 19,33,381 which was 19 percent higher than that of 2020 (16,28,161). The programme had been able to catch-up with the dip in TB notifications that was observed around the months when the two major covid waves happened in India.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The estimated incidence of all forms of TB in India as per Global TB report was 456 per lakh population in 2010, 437 per lakh population in 2011, 420 per lakh population in 2012, 404 per lakh population in 2013, 350 per lakh population in 2014, 328 per lakh population in 2015, 303 per lakh population in 2016, 286 per lakh population in 2017, 276 per lakh population in 2018, 266 per lakh population in 2019, and 257 per lakh population in 2020.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The estimated number of Multidrug-resistant (MDR) and Extensively drug-resistant (XDR) TB cases to have been put on treatment as per the global TB report 2021 was 4 per 100,000 and 1 per 100,000 population, respectively.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; During the pandemic, a significant reduction was observed in the total number of&nbsp;Drug-Resistant TB&nbsp;(DR-TB) patients started on treatment as compared to 2019. In 2020 and 2021, there was a reduction of 14 percent and 9 percent in the number MDR patients put on treatment as compared to the&nbsp;estimated numbers.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The estimated mortality rate among all forms of TB was 37 per 100,000 population (34-40 per 100,000 population) in 2020, as per the Global TB Report 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; There has been a slight increase in the mortality rate due to all forms of TB between 2019 and 2020 by 11 percent in the country.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In absolute numbers, the total number of estimated deaths from all forms of TB excluding HIV, for 2020 was 4.93 lakhs (4.53-5.36 lakhs) in the country, which was 13 percent higher that of the year 2019 estimate. &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; As per Nikshay, the total number of reported deaths among Drug sensitive (DS-TB) notified in 2020 was 76,002 (4.3 percent of the total notifications of 2020) which is 15.4 percent of the estimate for the country, thus emphasizing the importance of establishing a &ldquo;TB Death Surveillance and Response&rdquo; system in line with the maternal mortality surveillance to improve the coverage and real time resolution of lacunae including the system related factors.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; A recent systematic review (2020) estimating the direct&nbsp;and indirect patient costs of drug-sensitive and drug-resistant TB care in India reports that 7 to 32 percent of among DS-TB patients and 68 percent of DR-TB were experiencing catastrophic costs for TB care in India.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2021, among 21,35,830 patients diagnosed, 20,30,509 (95 percent) patients were put on treatment. 61 percent were male and 39 percent were female among the patients put on treatment.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Among the total notification, 6 percent patients were in paediatric age group. Among 17,51,437 TB patients notified in 2020, 83 percent were successfully treated while 4 percent died during treatment.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2021, 48,232 MDR/RR-TB patients were diagnosed and 43,380 (90 percent) were put on treatment. 8,455 Pre-XDR-TB, 376 XDR-TB and 13,724 H mono/poly patients were diagnosed and 7,562 (89 percent), 333 (89 percent) and 12,008 (87 percent) were put on treatment respectively.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; A total of 1939 patients were initiated on shorter oral Bdq-containing MDR/RR-TB regimen, 23,889 on longer M/XDR-TB regimen and 25,235 patients were initiated on shorter injection containing MDR-TB regimen.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The cohort of DR-TB patients initiated on treatment in 2019 reported 57 percent treatment success rate (34,535/60,873). This includes 39,358 of patients on shorter MDR-TB regimen (inj-containing) with 59 percent treatment success rate and 1,280 of patient on longer oral regimen with 70 percent treatment success rate. This cohort also includes 11,791 patients put on old conventional MDR-TB regimen that has reported 49 percent treatment success rate.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Available evidence and modelling studies indicate that nearly 20 percent of all TB cases in India may suffer from Diabetes Mellitus (DM).&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Under the&nbsp;National Tuberculosis Elimination Programme&nbsp;(NTEP), in 2021, out of the 74 percent of the known tobacco usage among all TB patients, 12 percent of TB patients were reported to be tobacco users. Among those screened, 30 percent were linked to tobacco cessation services.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Of all the notified TB patients, 95 percent know their HIV status. (Public: 96 percent, Private: 92 percent).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Nearly 95 percent of TB Detection Centres (TDCs) have co-located HIV testing facilities.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; More than 96 percent of&nbsp;People Living With HIV/AIDS&nbsp;(PLHIV) visiting the antiretroviral therapy (ART) centres every month are screened for existing TB symptoms.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; As per Nikshay data, the linkage of HIV-TB co-infected patients to Cotrimoxazole Preventive Therapy (CPT) and Antiretroviral Therapy in 2021 were 93 percent &amp; 95 percent, respectively.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Kindly click <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/JSA-Press-Statement-UB-2022-23-English-Final.pdf">here</a> and <a href="https://im4change.org/latest-news-updates/union-health-budget-2022-23-has-completely-overlooked-the-lessons-of-the-covid-19-epidemic-says-jan-swasthya-abhiyan.html">here</a> to access the [inside]Press release by Jan Swasthya Abhiyan dated February 2, 2022[/inside] on the Union Health Budget 2022-23.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">---</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The COVID-19 pandemic has devastated families and communities and disrupted societies and economies. Patients had to endure various indignities in both public and private hospitals without protections or recourse to adequate preventive and redressal mechanisms. While the COVID-19 vaccine is seen as a solution to the pandemic, its roll-out has also been rife with inequalities. However, many of the problems we have seen at this time stem from the deep-rooted problems in the public health system. A critical look at India&quot;s health system from the perspective of its patients is overdue.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Oxfam India undertook two rapid surveys on Patient&quot;s Rights Charter and COVID-19 vaccination through self-administered questionnaires, covering 28 states and 5 Union territories; as such, this bears the limitations arising from it being a self-selected sample. The former was done between February and April 2021 and received 3890 responses while the latter was done between August and September 2021 covering 10,955 respondents. Given the distinctive focus of each survey, both are presented separately.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The key findings of the survey on Patient&#39;s Rights done for Oxfam India report titled [inside]Securing Rights of Patients in India: Lessons from rapid surveys on peoples&rsquo; experiences of Patient&rsquo;s Rights Charter and the COVID-19 vaccination drive (released on 18 November, 2021)[/inside] are as follows (please <a href="/upload/files/Securing%20Rights%20of%20Patients%20in%20India%20by%20Oxfam%20India.pdf">click here</a> to access):&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; This captures some of the experience of patients with both the public and private healthcare system over the last decade with a focus on the provisions of the Patients &quot;Rights Charter.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Right to Confidentiality, Human Dignity and Privacy: Over a third of women (35 percent) said that they had to undergo a physical examination by a male practitioner without another female present in the room.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Right to Information: 74 percent of people said that the doctor simply wrote the prescription or treatment or asked them to get tests/ investigations done without explaining their disease, nature and/or cause of illness.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Right to Informed Consent: More than half of the respondents (57 percent) who were themselves/ their relatives had been hospitalised did not receive any information about investigations and tests being done.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Right to Second Opinion: At least a third of respondents who had themselves/ their relatives hospitalised said their doctor did not allow a second opinion.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Right to Non-Discrimination: A third of Muslim respondents and over 20 percent Dalit and Adivasi respondents reported feeling discriminated against on the grounds of their religion or caste in a hospital/ by a healthcare professional.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Right to Choose Source of Obtaining Medicine or Test: 8 in 10 respondents reported being asked to get tests/diagnostics from one place only.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Right to Transparency in Rates and Care According to Prescribed Rates: 58 percent of people of those who had themselves/ their relatives hospitalised, said that they were not provided with an estimated cost of treatment/procedure before the start of treatment/procedure. Three in every 10 people surveyed reported being denied case papers, patient records, investigation reports for treatment/ procedure by the hospital even after requesting the same.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Right to Take Discharge of Patient or Receive Body of Deceased from the Hospital: 19 percent of respondents whose close relatives were hospitalized said that they were denied the release of the dead body by the hospital</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em>The COVID-19 pandemic has deepened existing structural inequalities in the healthcare system. The report recommends:</em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The MoHFW should set up a mechanism to review the present status of adoption of the Patient&quot;s Rights Charter (PRC) in all states and UTs and order its immediate adoption. It should include the PRC in the Clinical Establishment Act (CEA) and issue a letter to the states and Union territories (UTs) for displaying PRC in all private and public hospitals in view of the unprecedented crisis induced by the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly for hospitals taking part in the Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (PMJAY).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The State and UT governments should issue orders to display the PRC in all private and public hospitals irrespective of adoption of CEA and ensure grievance redressal mechanisms for patients, through the appointment of an internal grievance officer within every public and private clinical establishment.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The National Medical Commission should introduce mandatory modules on patients &quot;rights in the healthcare curriculum.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em>Some of the key findings from the survey of the experiences of the vaccination drive were:</em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Eight out of 10 people said that they do not think that the government will be able to vaccinate all adults by December 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; 80 percent of people believed that it is more difficult for a daily wage worker to get the vaccine as compared to a salaried, middle-class person. Most did not think that the experience was equitable.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; With respect to how the government should address inequity in vaccination, some specific suggestions were:&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">- 83 percent believed that all vaccination should be done completely free of cost through the government, like previous vaccination drives.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">- Only 2 percent of respondents were in favour of a tax on essentials like fuel to fund the vaccination. 55 percent believed that imposing a one-time tax of 1 percent on the net-worth of India&quot;s richest 1000 families was the best mode of funding.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">- 89 percent of people said that the operational hours of vaccination centres should be expanded beyond 9 AM-5 PM.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">- 95 percent of people from all age categories felt that vaccination must be brought closer to the elderly, persons with disabilities and informal sector workers by making use of mobile vans, vaccination camps and home-based vaccination.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">- 88 percent believed that the government must ensure that marginalized groups such as street dwellers, migrant workers, immigrants, refugees and asylum seekers are given access to<br /> vaccination without having to furnish documentation.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">- Improve information about vaccination. 74 percent of respondents earned less than INR 10,000 per month and over 60 percent of respondents from marginalized and minority communities felt that the government has failed in informing them about how and when to get vaccinated. Eight in 10 felt that the government had been changing its COVID-19 vaccine policies too frequently.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">- 89 percent of people said that the government must do more to ramp vaccine production, especially through public sector companies.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">- The experiences of vaccination show the</p> <p style="text-align:justify">-- Challenges with vaccination:</p> <p style="text-align:justify">---29 percent said that they either had to make multiple visits to the vaccination centre or stand in long queues.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">---22 percent faced issues in booking the slot online or had to try for multiple days ahead to get a slot</p> <p style="text-align:justify">---9 percent people said that they had to lose a day&#39;s wages to get themselves vaccinated.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">-- Reason for not getting vaccinated:</p> <p style="text-align:justify">---43 percent respondents stated that they could not get vaccinated because the vaccination centre had run out of vaccines when they visited the centre.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">---12 percent did not get vaccinated because they could not afford the high prices of vaccines.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The lessons from the COVID-19 vaccination drive, would not only help to improve the current response but can derive learnings improving equitable administration of any vaccine in future.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">-All vaccination should continue to be done completely free of cost through the government system; avoid the use of private hospitals to deliver vaccination;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">-Proactively release timely information on vaccination strategies, modalities and accomplishments in disaggregated, user-friendly and open source formats;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">-Prioritise allocation, distribution and administration of vaccines for marginalized, poor, vulnerable, excluded communities first, of course along with for those who are at risk;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">-Maintain record and release disaggregated data on vaccination coverage based on social and economic groups including Dalits(Scheduled Caste), Adivasis(Scheduled Tribes), Muslims, and Persons with Disabilities (PwD);<br /> &nbsp;<br /> -Bring vaccination closer to the vulnerable and extend operational hours of vaccination centres beyond 9 AM-5 PM to allow for vaccination without a loss of wages;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">-Improve information dissemination about vaccination; existing technology-based mechanisms for disseminating information about vaccination centres locations and availability of vaccines is not sufficient. It would be important to build robust and functional grievance redressal mechanisms, from national to local, to address emerging challenges. Adequate flexibility must be given to local health administrations to adapt to local circumstances;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">-Further ramp up vaccine production, especially through the use of public sector companies.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The report titled [inside]&#39;COVID-19 Third Wave Preparedness: Children&rsquo;s Vulnerability and Recovery&#39; (released on 2nd August, 2021)[/inside] is the outcome of a two-part series of online consultative meetings hosted by National Institute of Disaster Management (NIDM, Delhi). These working group consultative meetings largely included &nbsp;stakeholders from diverse backgrounds -- Central &nbsp;Government, State &nbsp;Governments, Civil Society Organisations (CSOs), social workers, humanitarians, academicians, scientists and researchers. Drawing lessons from the first and second waves, through the deliberations by leading experts during these meetings, the NIDM has been able to produce in the form of final outcome, recommendations for the preparedness of the third wave on the issues related to children and women and their well-being. Kindly <a href="/upload/files/NIDM%20report.pdf">click here</a> to access the report.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The consultative meetings held by NIDM with various stakeholders strongly recommended: a home care model, ramping up of vaccination especially for parents, nurses and other front-line workers, immediate recruitment of healthcare staffs and medical facilities for children, guarantee food security especially for the vulnerable amongst vulnerable, strengthen the community level engagement and risk awareness and communication, zero tolerance towards sexual abuse of children and women and raising awareness through a massive public outreach campaign. There is a huge gap between urban and rural India in terms of awareness, digitisation and medical facilities. It seems like the pandemic outbreak has only exacerbated social inequities and highlighted shortcomings of our society. Hence, the government must prioritise rural India and vulnerable groups in order to cope with the ongoing pandemic. This special report also outlines the women-children complementarity, suggesting that a child&rsquo;s inclusive growth largely depends on that of the mother.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">---</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> The <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/Inequality%20Report%202021%20Indias%20Unequal%20Healthcare%20Story.pdf">report</a> titled Inequality Report 2021: India&#39;s Unequal Healthcare Story examines the status of inequality across various indicators of health among different sections of the population from 2005-06 to 2015-16. The report analyses the government interventions made in terms of health programmes and its impact on health inequality. It also includes ground experiences of people, particularly the marginalised groups, during the pandemic.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The key findings of the [inside]Oxfam India&#39;s Inequality Report 2021: India&#39;s Unequal Healthcare Story (released on 19th July, 2021)[/inside] are as follows (please <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/Inequality%20Report%202021%20Indias%20Unequal%20Healthcare%20Story.pdf">click here</a> to access):&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Growing socio-economic inequalities in India are disproportionately affecting health outcomes of marginalised groups due to the absence of Universal Health Coverage (UHC), reveals Oxfam <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/Inequality%20Report%202021%20Indias%20Unequal%20Healthcare%20Story.pdf">India&rsquo;s Inequality Report</a> <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/Inequality%20Report%202021%20Indias%20Unequal%20Healthcare%20Story.pdf">2021: India&rsquo;s Unequal Healthcare Story</a>.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The new <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/Inequality%20Report%202021%20Indias%20Unequal%20Healthcare%20Story.pdf">report</a> by Oxfam India provides a comprehensive analysis of the health outcomes across different socioeconomic groups to gauge the level of health inequality that persists in the country. The report shows the general category performs better than Scheduled Castes-SCs and Scheduled Tribes-STs; Hindus perform better than Muslims; the rich perform better than the poor; men are better off than women; and the urban population is better off than the rural population on various health indicators. The COVID-19 pandemic has further exacerbated these inequalities.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The public healthcare system in India with its weak and understaffed infrastructure has been overburdened with the consistently rising cases. Private healthcare providers, on the other hand, were charging exorbitant prices, preventing the middle-class and the poor from getting diagnosed and treated until the government intervened to cap their prices. Even then, private healthcare has remained inaccessible to the poor while the rich have easily availed its services. As such, the poor and the vulnerable have mostly been dependent on the overburdened public healthcare facilities &mdash; with insufficient number of beds and inadequate human resources &mdash; for treatment or have gone without being diagnosed and treated.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Health inequalities are linked to and reflect socio-economic inequalities. Often times, it is the socio-economically marginalised communities that suffer from ill-health the most. The ongoing pandemic has revealed that the health systems in most countries are under-prepared to cope with any major health emergency and its unequal impact on the have and the have-nots.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Over the last few decades, India has made great progress in healthcare provisioning. Yet, progressively, the trend has been towards supporting the growth of the private sector in healthcare. This growth has only exacerbated the existing inequalities leaving the poor and the marginalised with no viable healthcare provisions. High costs of health services and lack of quality leads to further impoverishment of the disadvantaged.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The private health sector provided only 5-10 percent of total patient care when India gained independence. Today, it accounts for 66 percent of hospitalization and non-hospitalization cases and 33 percent of institutional births. This growth has been boosted by government concessions and has attracted domestic and foreign companies to set up tertiary care and super speciality hospitals. Within the country, the private formal sector has a distinct customer base. They are the urban-rich. Dehury et al. writes that private hospitals &lsquo;cater to a pool of patient community having health insurance, corporate tie-ups and referrals from general physicians. Usually, the paying capacity of these patients [are] higher than the common Indian citizen&hellip;these hospitals cater to the Indian elite class and organized sector workers having all financial protection.&rsquo;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The private sector is geared towards profits whereas the public provisioning of health services ensures that the poor and the marginalised have equal access to quality healthcare services closer to home. India&rsquo;s public health provisioning has, however, been weak. The public expenditure on health by the central government as a percentage of GDP was a mere 0.32 percent in 2019-20.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The combined expenditure by state and central government was about 1.16 percent of the GDP in 2019, rising marginally by 0.02 percent from 2018 &mdash; falling far behind the goal of making health expenditure 2.5 percent of the GDP. The per capita health expenditure is highest in Arunachal Pradesh at INR 9,854 and lowest in Bihar at INR 697. In the 2021-22 budget, the health ministry has been allocated a total of INR 76,901 crore, a decline of 9.8 percent from the revised estimates of 2020-21 at INR 85,250 crore.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Public funds for health has also been invested specifically in secondary and tertiary care rather than in the provisioning of primary healthcare. &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The public sector has prioritized secondary and tertiary care over primary care. Yet, experts acknowledge that primary care is the cornerstone of achieving equitable delivery and access to quality healthcare by all. While focus has been put on achieving Universal Healthcare in India; the government has selectively adopted the insurance model as a way to universalise healthcare instead of enhancing the primary health care system. As such, access to good quality public healthcare has remained fragmented and India is still far away from achieving universal coverage. The rich can avail healthcare from high-end private providers but the poor are stuck with a difficult choice. They either have to incur debts by availing health care from private providers or depend on a poor public healthcare system.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The Planning Commission in 2011 had observed that expenditure in secondary and tertiary care was drawing away attention from primary health services. Research studies substantiate this position and it is argued that &lsquo;[s]ubstantial proportions of the health budgets have been spent on&hellip;high-end tertiary medical services &mdash; all of which largely benefits the middle classes and detracts from the provision of public health services.&rsquo; Studies have also attributed India&rsquo;s high disease burden to the government&rsquo;s exclusive focus on the urban-oriented curative medical model. The government&rsquo;s focus on &lsquo;a heavily medicalized and hightech curative medical interventions&rsquo;&nbsp;has derailed the goal to make quality and affordable public healthcare accessible to all irrespective of their ability to pay. The result has been a widening of health inequalities along caste, class, gender and geography.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; To make the goals of National Health Mission (NRHM and National Urban Health Mission were subsumed under the NHM in 2013) a reality, there needs to be a strong public health infrastructure in place, even in hard-to-reach areas. Sufficient medical supplies, equipment, drugs and trained medical staff in health centres should be the standard. On the contrary, public health centres remain understaffed with limited supplies.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Among other things, the Inequality Report 2021 on health has recommended the government to increase health spending to 2.5 percent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) to ensure a more equitable health system in the country; ensure that union budgetary allocation in health for SCs and STs is proportionate to their population; prioritize primary health by ensuring that two-thirds of the health budget is allocated for strengthening primary healthcare; state governments to allocate their expenditure on health to 2.5 percent of Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP); the centre should extend financial support to the states with low per capita health expenditure to reduce inter-state inequality in health. It has asked to widen the ambit of insurance schemes to include out-patient care. The major expenditures on health happen through out-patient costs as consultations, diagnostic tests, medicines, etc. While the report does not endorse Government-financed Health Insurance Schemes (GFHIS) as a way to achieve UHC and stresses that insurance can only be a component of it, it is imperative that GFHIS widens its ambit to include outpatient costs as a way to reduce out-of-pocket expenditure (OOPE).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The Constitution of India does not guarantee a fundamental right to health though it does refer to the role of the government in the provisioning of healthcare to all its citizens. Therefore, the right to health should be enacted as a fundamental right that makes it obligatory for the government to ensure equal access to timely, acceptable, and affordable healthcare of appropriate quality, and address the underlying determinants of health to close the gap in health outcomes between the rich and poor.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; With the lockdown aimed at checking the spread of COVID-19, health systems prioritized services related only to COVID-19. Human and material resources like hospitals, beds and intensive care units were diverted towards the management and treatment of COVID-19 patients. Health services catering to non-Covid illnesses were halted, leading to unprecedented hardships and sufferings for chronic patients and those requiring immediate medical intervention such as pregnant women. Accessibility to non-Covid medical services were grimmer for patients in rural and hard-to-reach areas as compared to urban areas due to the unavailability of health centres in the vicinity and the lack of transportation facilities.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Disruptions in the availability of drugs for non-communicable diseases (NCD), tuberculosis (TB), contraceptive and other essential services were also reported. Telemedicine &mdash; the practice of caring for patients remotely &mdash; for which guidelines were issued by the Government of India in March 2020 to facilitate access to medical advice made consultations easier. However, for those with no smart phones and internet connectivity, particularly in rural and hard-to-reach areas, seeking medical advice remained a difficult task. The immunization drive was also disrupted. India vaccinates around 20 million children every year and its disruption might add to the largest number of unimmunized children in the world.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The National Health Profile in 2017 recorded one government allopathic doctor for every 10,189 people and one state-run hospital for every 90,343 people. India also ranks the lowest in the number of hospital beds per thousand population among the BRICS nations &mdash; Russia scores the highest (7.12), followed by China (4.3), South Africa (2.3), Brazil (2.1) and India (0.5). India also ranks lower than some of the lesser developed countries such as Bangladesh (0.87), Chile (2.11) and Mexico (0.98).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The current expenditure on health, by the Centre and the state governments combined, is only about 1.25 percent of GDP which is the lowest among the BRICS countries &mdash; Brazil (9.2) has the highest allocation, followed by South Africa (8.1), Russia (5.3) and China (5.0). It is also lower than some of its neighbouring countries such as Bhutan (2.5 percent) and Sri Lanka (1.6 percent). The low priority given to health expenditure is also reflected in the share in total expenditure of the government, which is only 4 percent whereas the global average stands at 11 percent. In Oxfam&rsquo;s Commitment to Reducing Inequality Report 2020, India ranks 154th in health spending, fifth from the bottom. This poor spending is reflected in the inadequate health resources and infrastructure. Only around 50,069 health and wellness centres (HWCs), which are envisaged to deliver comprehensive primary healthcare (CPHC) closer to homes, are functional. These centres are only 65 percent of the cumulative target for 2020-21. Moreover, in 2019, less than 10 percent of PHCs were funded as per IPHS norms whereas the rest remained underfunded.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Different studies have proved that low public health expenditure yields worse health outcomes. Studies by Barenberg et al. investigated the impact of public health expenditure on Infant Mortality Rate (IMR) and found a negative relationship between the two. Farahani et al. evaluated the relationship between state-level public health spending of India and individual mortality across all age groups using household-level data from the third National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3) showing that a 10 percent increase in public spending on health decreases mortality by about 2 percent, with effects mainly concentrated on women, the young, and the elderly.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The out-of-pocket health expenditure of 64.2 percent in India is higher than the world average of 18.2 percent. Exorbitant prices of healthcare has forced many to sell household assets and incur debts.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The global average for life expectancy is 72.6 years but India (69.42) remains below the global average. It is also lower than the neighbouring countries Nepal (70.8), Bhutan (71.8), Bangladesh (72.6), and Sri Lanka (77) and its BRICS counterparts Brazil (75.9), China (76.9), and Russia (72.6).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; A comprehensive provisioning of public health as water, sanitation and primary healthcare is the most efficient and cost-effective way to achieve UHC around the world.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Evidence from Thailand and Sri Lanka, which have performed better than India with regard to universal access to healthcare, shows that these countries have a high public provisioning of services. Also, evidence from developed countries like Germany, Sweden, Canada and developing countries like Costa Rica reveal that successful insurance-based healthcare system was attained with high levels of public spending and government provisioning of healthcare services.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The Oxfam India <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/Inequality%20Report%202021%20Indias%20Unequal%20Healthcare%20Story.pdf">report</a> says that &lsquo;Kerala invested in infrastructure to create a multi-layered health system, designed to provide first-contact access for basic services at the community level and expanded integrated primary healthcare coverage to achieve access to a range of preventive and curative services&hellip;[,] expanded the number of medical facilities, hospital beds, and doctors&hellip;[and] public health and social development initiatives&hellip; aided in creating the environment for a strong and effective primary care system.&rsquo;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="/upload/files/SOPonCOVID19Containment%26ManagementinPeriurbanRural%26tribalareas.pdf">click here</a> to access the [inside]Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) on COVID-19 Containment and Management in Peri-urban, Rural and Tribal areas[/inside] dated 16th May, 2021. The SOP was issued by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>---</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">The key findings of the report titled [inside]Rural Health Statistics 2019-20 (released in April 2021)[/inside], which has been prepared by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, are as follows (please <a href="/upload/files/Rural%20Health%20Statistics%202019-20%20report%20MoHFW%20latest%20available%282%29.pdf">click here</a> to access):</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; As on 31st March, 2020, there were 1,55,404 and 2,517 Sub Centres (SCs), 24,918 and 5,895 Primary Health Centres (PHCs) and 5,183 and 466 Community Health Centres (CHCs), respectively, which were functioning in rural and urban areas of the country.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average rural population covered by a Sub Centre was 5,729 as on 1st July, 2020, whereas the norm is that one Sub Centre should be serving a population of size in the range 300-5,000.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average population in tribal/ hilly/ desert areas covered by a Sub Centre was 3,381 as on 1st July, 2020, whereas the norm is that one Sub Centre should be serving a population of size up to 3,000 in such areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; A Sub Centre is the most peripheral and first contact point between the primary health care system and the community. Sub Centres are assigned tasks relating to interpersonal communication in order to bring about behavioral change and provide services in relation to maternal and child health, family welfare, nutrition, immunisation, diarrhoea control and control of communicable diseases programmes. Each Sub Centre is required to be manned by at least one auxiliary nurse midwife (ANM) / female health worker and one male health worker. Under the National Rural Health Mission (NRHM), there is a provision for one additional second ANM on contract basis. One lady health visitor (LHV) is entrusted with the task of supervision of six Sub Centres. The Government of India bears the salary of ANM and LHV while the salary of the Male Health Worker is borne by the state governments.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average rural population covered by a Primary Health Centre (PHC) was 35,730 as on 1st July, 2020, whereas the norm is that one Primary Health Centre should be serving a population of size in the range 20,000-30,000.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average population in tribal/ hilly/ desert areas covered by a PHC was 23,930 as on 1st July, 2020, whereas the norm is that one PHC should be serving a population of size up to 20,000 in such areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; PHC is the first contact point between the village community and the medical officer. The PHCs were envisaged to provide an integrated curative and preventive health care to the rural population with emphasis on preventive and promotive aspects of health care. The PHCs are established and maintained by the state governments under the Minimum Needs Programme (MNP)/ Basic Minimum Services (BMS) Programme. As per minimum requirement, a PHC is to be manned by a medical officer supported by 14 paramedical and other staff. Under NRHM, there is a provision for two additional staff nurses at PHCs on contract basis. It acts as a referral unit for 6 Sub Centres and has 4-6 beds for patients. The activities of PHC involve curative, preventive, promotive and family welfare services.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average rural population covered by a Community Health Centre was 1,71,779 as on 1st July, 2020, whereas the norm is that one Community Health Centre should be serving a population of size in the range 80,000-1,20,000.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The average population in tribal/ hilly/ desert areas covered by a CHC was 97,178 as on 1st July, 2020, whereas the norm is that one CHC should be serving a population of size up to 80,000 in such areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; CHCs are being established and maintained by the state government under Minimum Needs Program (MNP)/Basic Minimum Services (BMS) programme. As per minimum norms, a CHC is required to be manned by four medical specialists i.e. surgeon, physician, gynecologist and pediatrician supported by 21 paramedical and other staff. It has 30 indoor beds with one OT, X-ray, labour room and laboratory facilities. It serves as a referral centre for 4 PHCs and also provides facilities for obstetric care and specialist consultations.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em>Rural Health Care System in India</em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Out of the sanctioned posts, a significant percentage of posts were vacant at all the levels. Nearly 14.1 percent of the sanctioned posts of Health Worker (Female)/ ANM (at SCs +PHCs) were vacant as compared to 37 percent vacancies of Health Worker (Male) in 2020. At PHCs, 37.6 percent of the sanctioned posts of Health Assistant (Male + Female) and 24.1 percent of the sanctioned posts of Doctors were vacant in 2020.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The availability of manpower is one of the important prerequisites for the efficient functioning of the Rural Health services. As on 31st March, 2020, the overall shortfall (which excludes the existing surplus in some of the states) in the posts of Health Worker (Female) / ANM was 2 percent of the total requirement as per the norm of one HW(F)/ ANM per Sub Centre and PHC. The overall shortfall was mainly due to the shortfall in states of Gujarat (1073), Himachal Pradesh (992), Rajasthan (657), Tripura (389) and Kerala (277). Similarly, in case of Health Worker (Male), there was a shortfall of 65.5 percent of the requirement.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; PHC is the first contact point between the village community and the Medical Officer. Manpower in PHC includes a Medical Officer supported by paramedical and other staff. In the case of PHC, for Health Assistant (male + female), the shortfall was 71.9 percent. For allopathic doctors at PHC, there was a shortfall of 6.8 percent of the total requirement at all India level. This shortfall happened due to a significant shortfall of doctors at PHCs in the states of Odisha (461), Chhattisgarh (404), Rajasthan (249), Madhya Pradesh (134), Uttar Pradesh (121) and Karnataka (105).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The Community Health Centres provide specialised medical care of Surgeons, Obstetricians &amp; Gynecologists, Physicians and Pediatricians. The latest available position of specialists manpower at CHCs as on 31st March, 2020 shows that out of the sanctioned posts, 68.4 percent of Surgeons, 56.1 percent of Obstetricians &amp; Gynecologists, 66.8 percent of physicians and 63.1 percent of pediatricians were vacant. Overall 63.3 percent of the sanctioned posts of specialists at CHCs were vacant. Moreover, as compared to requirements for existing infrastructure, there was a shortfall of 78.9 percent of Surgeons, 69.7 percent of Obstetricians &amp; Gynecologists, 78.2 percent of Physicians and 78.2 percent of Pediatricians. Overall, there was a shortfall of 76.1 percent of specialists at the CHCs as compared to the requirement for existing CHCs. The shortfall of specialists was significantly high in most of the states. However, in addition to the specialists, about 15,342 General Duty Medical Officers (GDMOs) Allopathic and 702 AYUSH Specialists along with 2,720 GDMO AYUSH were also available at CHCs as on 31st March, 2020. In addition to this, there were 890 Anaesthetists and 301 Eye Surgeons available at CHCs as on 31st March, 2020.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Comparison of the manpower position of major categories in 2020 with that in 2019 shows an overall decrease in the number of ANMs at SCs &amp; PHCs and Doctors at PHCs during the period. However, there was an increase in the number of Specialists at CHCs. The number of Specialists at CHCs had increased from 3,881 in 2019 to 4,857 in 2020, which was an increase of 27.7 percent.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Considering the status of paramedical staff, there was an increase of Lab Technicians from 18,715 in 2019 to 19,903 in 2020 at PHCs and CHCs. There was a marginal decrease in the number of pharmacists from 26,204 in 2019 to 25,792 in 2020. A significant decrease was also observed in nursing staff under PHC &amp; CHCs from 80,976 in 2019 to 71,847 in 2020. The number of radiographers had increased marginally from 2,419 in 2019 to 2,434 in 2020.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; A total of 1,193 Sub Divisional/ Sub District Hospitals were functioning as on 31st March, 2020 throughout the country. In these hospitals, 13,399 doctors were available. In addition to these doctors, about 29,937 paramedical staff were also available at those hospitals as on 31st March, 2020. The number of doctors in Sub Divisional/ Sub District Hospitals had reduced from 13,750 in 2019 to 13,399 in 2020. The number of paramedical staff in Sub Divisional/ Sub District Hospitals fell from 36,909 in 2019 to 29,937 in 2020.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In addition to above, 810 District Hospitals (DHs) were also functioning as on 31st March, 2020 throughout the country. There were 22,827 doctors available in the DHs. In addition to the doctors, about 80,920 paramedical staff were also available at District Hospitals as on 31st March, 2020. The number of doctors in District Hospitals went down from 24,676 in 2019 to 22,827 in 2020. The number of paramedical staff in District Hospitals fell from 85,194 in 2019 to 80,920 in 2020.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; As per the Health &amp; Wellness Centre (HWC) portal data, there were a total of 38,595 HWCs functional in India as on 31st March 2020. In total, 18,610 SCs had been converted into HWC-SCs. Also at the level of PHC, a total of 19,985 PHCs had been converted into HWC-PHCs. Out of 19,985 HWC-PHCs, 16,635 PHCs had been converted into HWCs in rural areas and 3,350 in urban areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">**page**</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">Kindly <a href="/upload/files/LASI_India_Factsheet.pdf">click here</a> to access the [inside]India Fact Sheet of Longitudinal Ageing Study in India (LASI) -- Wave-1 (released in 2021)[/inside], An Investigation of Health, Economic, and Social Well-being of India&rsquo;s Growing Elderly Population, India Report 2020, prepared by International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), National Programme for Health Care Elderly (NPHCE), Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health (HSPH), University&nbsp; of Southern California (USC) and Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MoHFW).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="/upload/files/LASI_India_Executive_Summary.pdf">click here</a> to read the [inside]Executive Summary of Longitudinal Ageing Study in India (LASI) -- Wave-1 (released in 2021)[/inside].</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>---</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to the report entitled [inside]A Neglected Tragedy: The global burden of stillbirths -- Report of the UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation, 2020 (released in October 2020)[/inside] (please click <a href="https://www.im4change.org/upload/files/UN-IGME-the-global-burden-of-stillbirths-2020.pdf">here</a> to access):</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; About one stillbirth occurs every 16 seconds, which means that every year, about 2 million babies are stillborn i.e. showing no signs of life at birth. It means every day, almost 5,400 babies are stillborn. Globally, one in 72 babies is stillborn.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In the past two decades, 48 million babies were stillborn. Three-in-four stillbirths occur in sub-Saharan Africa or Southern Asia. Low and lower-middle income countries account for 84 percent of all stillbirths but only 62 percent of all live births.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Stillbirths are largely absent in worldwide data tracking, rendering the true extent of the problem hidden. They are invisible in policies and programmes and underfinanced as an area requiring intervention. Targets specific to stillbirths were absent from the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and are still missing in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; There are a variety of reasons behind the slow reduction in stillbirth rates: absence of or poor quality of care during pregnancy and birth; lack of investment in preventative interventions and the health workforce; inadequate social recognition of stillbirths as a burden on families; measurement challenges and major data gaps; absence of global and national leadership; and no established global targets, such as the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Globally, an estimated 42 percent of all stillbirths are intrapartum (i.e., the baby died during labour); almost all of these 832,000 stillborn deaths that occurred in 2019 could have been prevented with access to high-quality care during childbirth, including ongoing intrapartum monitoring and timely intervention in case of complications.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Around 20 million babies are projected to be stillborn in the next decade, if trends observed between 2000 and 2019 in reducing the stillbirth rate continue. Among the 20 million, 2.9 million stillbirths could be prevented by accelerating progress to meet the ENAP target in the 56 countries at risk to miss the goal. Every Newborn Action Plan (ENAP) calls for each country to achieve a rate of 12 stillbirths or fewer per 1,000 total births by 2030 and to close equity gaps.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In the first two decades of this century (i.e. 2000-2019), the annual rate of reduction (ARR) in the stillbirth rate was just -2.3 percent, compared to a -2.9 percent reduction in neonatal mortality and -4.3 percent among children aged 1&ndash;59 months. Meanwhile, between 2000 and 2017, maternal mortality decreased by -2.9 percent.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In the year 2000, the ratio of the number of stillbirths to the number of under-five deaths was 0.30; by 2019, it had increased to 0.38. So, stillbirths are an increasingly critical global health problem.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; National stillbirth rates around the globe ranged from 1.4 to 32.2 stillbirths per 1,000 total births in 2019. Sub-Saharan Africa, followed by Southern Asia, had the highest stillbirth rate and the greatest number of stillbirths.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Six countries bore the burden of half of all stillbirths of the world &ndash; India, Pakistan, Nigeria, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, China and Ethiopia, in order of burden (highest to lowest).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Nearly 3,40,622 of the 19,66,000&nbsp; stillbirths globally in 2019 were in India, making it the country with the largest such burden (i.e. 17.33 percent).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2019, India, Pakistan and Nigeria alone accounted for one-third of the total burden of stillbirths and 27 percent of live births.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Stillbirth rate is defined as the ratio of the number of still births per 1,000 live births and stillbirths taken together (i.e. total births).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Some progress has been made in preventing stillbirths. Globally, the stillbirth rate declined by 35 percent since 2000. Since 2000, the stillbirth rate declined by 44 percent in Central and Southern Asia, 53 percent in India, 52 percent in Kazakhstan and 44 percent in Nepal.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Among the lower-middle income countries, stillbirth rate fell by 39 percent since 2000. Since the year 2000, stillbirth rate in lower-middle income countries like Mongolia, India and El Salvador declined by 57 percent, 53 percent and 50 percent, respectively.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; A total of 14 countries &ndash; including three low- and lower middle income countries (Cambodia, India, Mongolia) &ndash; slashed the stillbirth rate by more than half during 2000-2019.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The top 15 countries with the greatest percentage decline in the stillbirth rate during 2000&ndash;2019 are China (63 percent), Turkey (63 percent), Georgia (62 percent), North Macedonia (62 percent), Belarus (60 percent), Mongolia (57 percent), Netherlands (55 percent), Azerbaijan (53 percent), Estonia (53 percent), India (53 percent), Kazakhstan (52 percent), Romania (52 percent), El Salvador (50 percent), Peru (48 percent) and Latvia (46 percent).<br /> &nbsp;<br /> &bull; India&#39;s stillbirth rate (i.e. (stillbirths per 1,000 total births) in 2000 was 29.6, in 2010 was 20.2 and in 2019 was 13.9. The percentage decline in India&#39;s stillbirth rate during 2000&ndash;2019 was -53.0 percent. The annual rate of reduction (ARR) in stillbirth rate during 2000-2019 was -4.0 percent.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The total number of stillbirths in India was 852,386 in 2000, 535,683 in 2010 and 340,622 in 2019. The percentage decline in stillbirths during 2000&ndash;2019 was -60.0 percent. The annual rate of reduction (ARR) in total number of stillbirths during 2000&ndash;2019 was -4.8 percent. India witnessed 24,116,000 livebirths and 24,457,000 total births in 2019. &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Women in sub-Saharan Africa and Southern Asia bear the greatest burden of stillbirths in the world. More than three quarters of estimated stillbirths in 2019 occurred in these two regions, with 42 percent of the global total in sub-Saharan Africa and 34 percent in Southern Asia.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2019, stillbirth rate per 1,000 total births in Afghanistan was 28.4 (total stillbirth in 2019: 35,384), Bangladesh was 24.3 (total stillbirth in 2019: 72,508), Bhutan was 9.7 (total stillbirth in 2019: 127), China was 5.5 (total stillbirth in 2019: 92,170), India was 13.9 (total stillbirth in 2019: 340,622), Maldives was 5.8 (total stillbirth in 2019: 41), Myanmar was 14.1 (total stillbirth in 2019: 13,493), Nepal was 17.5 (total stillbirth in 2019: 9,997), Pakistan was 30.6 (total stillbirth in 2019: 190,483) and Sri Lanka was 5.8 (total stillbirth in 2019: 1,943).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Data are essential to understanding the burden of stillbirths and identifying where, when and why they occur.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Immediate actions are needed to strengthen data systems and their ability to collect, analyses and use timely, quality and disaggregated stillbirth data. To improve stillbirth data availability and quality, it is recommended that countries and relevant stakeholders:</p> <p style="text-align:justify">a. Align the stillbirth definition and measures with international standards<br /> b.&nbsp; Integrate stillbirth-specific components within relevant plans for data system strengthening and improvement<br /> c. Record stillbirth outcomes in all relevant maternal and newborn health programs, including routine HMIS (registers and monthly reporting forms)<br /> d. Provide training and support to include stillbirths within civil and vital registration systems as the coverage of these systems increases<br /> e. Include information on timing of stillbirth (antepartum or intrapartum) in all settings and record causes and contributing factors to stillbirth where possible<br /> f. Report and review stillbirth data locally &ndash; at facility or district level &ndash; alongside data on neonatal deaths (by day of death) to reduce incentives for misreporting of outcomes, and to monitor potential misclassification.<br /> g. Collate reported stillbirth rate data up the data system to a national level to enable tracking of progress towards the ENAP target of 12 stillbirths or fewer per 1,000 total births in every country by 2030 and to enable monitoring of geographical inequities.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Ending preventable stillbirths is among the core goals of the UN&rsquo;s Global Strategy for Women&rsquo;s, Children&rsquo;s and Adolescents&rsquo; Health (2016&ndash;2030) and the Every Newborn Action Plan (ENAP). These global initiatives aim to reduce the stillbirth rate to 12 or fewer third trimester (late) stillbirths per 1,000 total births in every country by 2030.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The stillbirth rate (SBR) is defined as the number of babies born with no signs of life at 28 weeks or more of gestation, per 1,000 total births. The stillbirth rate is calculated as: SBR = 1000 * {sb/(sb+lb)}, where &#39;sb&#39; refers to the number of stillbirths &ge; 28 weeks or more of gestational age; and &#39;lb&#39; refers to the number of live births regardless of gestational age or birthweight.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> <strong><em>[Shivangini Piplani, who is doing her MA in Finance and Investment (1st year) from Berlin School of Business and Innovation, assisted the Inclusive Media for Change team in preparing the summary of &#39;A Neglected Tragedy: The global burden of stillbirths -- Report of the UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation, 2020.&#39; She did this work as part of her winter internship at the Inclusive Media for Change project in December 2020.]</em></strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> The Sample Registration System (SRS) is carried out by the Office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner, India with the goal of providing accurate annual estimates of birth rates, death rates, child mortality rates and many other indices of pregnancy and fertility and mortality. The SRS has been providing data for the estimation of various mortality measures since its inception. The report provides mortality indices at the national and state levels, as well as death rates at the sub-state, viz. NSS Natural Division Level. &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The key findings of [inside]Sample Registration System Statistical Report 2018 (released in June 2020)[/inside], published by the Office of the Registrar General &amp; Census Commissioner, are as follows (please <a href="/upload/files/SRS_Statistical_Report_2018.pdf"><span style="background-color:#ffffff">click here</span></a> to access):</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Crude Death Rate (CDR)</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Crude Death Rate (CDR), which is defined as the number of deaths in a year per thousand population, at the national level, stood at 6.2 in 2018. It was 6.7 in rural areas and 5.1 in urban areas. For all bigger states/ UTs, except West Bengal, the CDR in rural areas was higher than that in urban areas. For West Bengal, CDR in rural (CDR 5.6) and urban (CDR 5.7) areas were almost identical, which makes the state the closest to the Line of Equity vis-&agrave;-vis other states/ UTs.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; States that exhibited large differences between urban CDR and rural CDR in 2018 were: Telangana (3 points), Punjab (2.6), Tamil Nadu (2.5), Andhra Pradesh (2.4), Karnataka (2.4), Chhattisgarh (2.3 points) and Himachal Pradesh (2.3). The difference is calculated as Rural CDR - Urban CDR = Difference in CDRs.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The top 5 states with the highest CDRs in 2018 were: Chhattisgarh (8.0), Odisha (7.3), Kerala (6.9), Himachal Pradesh (6.9) and Andhra Pradesh (6.7).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Between the periods 2006-08 and 2016-18, the average CDR at the national level changed by &ndash;14.9 percentage points. Between the above-said time points, CDR declined for all states, except Kerala, which showed an increase of 6 percentage points possibly due to the changes in age structure of its population.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Infant Mortality Rate (IMR)</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Infant Mortality Rate (IMR) is defined as the number of infant (less than one year of age) deaths per one thousand live births during the year.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; IMR has seen a substantial decline over the years, from 129 per 1000 live births in 1971 to 110 in 1981 and from 80 in 1991 to 32 in 2018.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; At the national level, IMR was 36.8 in rural areas and 22.9 in urban areas during the period 2016-18. However, IMR was 36 in rural areas and 23 in urban areas in 2018.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2018, Kerala had the lowest IMR of 7 and Madhya Pradesh had the highest IMR of 48.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2018, at the national level, IMR among male infants stood at 32, while that for female infants it was 33.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; For the year 2018, in all states except Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Delhi, Gujarat, Haryana, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Odisha, Punjab, Tamil Nadu, Telangana and Uttarakhand, female infants experienced a higher mortality rate as compared to male infants.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2018, Jharkhand had the highest difference between male IMR (27) and female IMR (34), followed by Bihar with a large difference between male IMR (30) and female IMR (35). As opposed to that, in Madhya Pradesh male IMR (51) exceeded female IMR (46).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2018, Assam witnessed the highest inequity between rural and urban IMRs with its rural IMR at 44 and urban IMR at 20. States like West Bengal (Urban IMR 20, Rural IMR 22), Punjab (Urban IMR 19, Rural IMR 21), Uttarakhand (Urban IMR 29, Rural IMR 31) and Bihar (Urban IMR 30, Rural IMR 32) had the least inequity between rural and urban IMR.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Between 2006-08 and 2016-18, the average IMR declined by -40.3 percent. In rural areas, decline in IMR between the above-said time points ranged from -63.9 percentage points in Delhi to -32.2 percentage points in Chhattisgarh. The highest fall in IMR in urban areas between the above-said time points was noticed in Delhi i.e. -56.4 percent.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Neonatal Mortality Rate</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Neo-natal Mortality Rate (NMR) is defined as the number of infant (less than 29 days) deaths per one thousand live births during the year.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2018, at the national level, NMR was 23, while in rural and urban areas, they were 27 and 14, respectively.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2018, NMR was the lowest in Kerala at 5 and highest in Madhya Pradesh at 35.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; At the national level, the percentage of neo-natal deaths to total infant deaths was 71.7 percent in 2018, and it was 60.1 percent in urban areas and 74.4 percent in rural areas. It means that most infants die when they are not even 30 days old.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Perinatal Mortality Rate</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Peri-natal mortality rate (PMR) is defined as the number of still births and infant deaths of less than 7 days per 1,000 live births (LB) and still births (SB) taken together during the year.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; At the national level, PMR has been estimated to be 22 in 2018. It was 25 in rural areas and 14 in urban areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2018, Madhya Pradesh had the highest PMR at 30 and Kerala had the lowest PMR at 10.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Still Birth Rate</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Still Birth Rate (SBR) is defined as the ratio of the number of still births per one thousand live births and still births taken together.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; At the national level, the SBR has been estimated to be 4 in 2018.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2018, the highest SBR has been estimated for Odisha (10) and lowest have been estimated for Jammu and Kashmir and Jharkhand (i.e. 1 each).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Under-five Mortality Rate (U5MR)</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Under-five Mortality Rate (U5MR) is the probability of dying between birth and exactly age 5, expressed per 1,000 live births.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; At the national level, U5MR has been estimated to be 36 in 2018. In urban areas, the U5MR in 2018 has been estimated to be 26 while in rural areas, it has been estimated to be 40.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Estimated U5MR was the lowest in Kerala at 10 and was the highest in Madhya Pradesh at 56.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; At the national level, female U5MR (37) was higher than the male U5MR (36) in 2018.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2018, female U5MRs were higher than that of male U5MR in all states except in Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Delhi, Gujarat, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Odisha, Punjab, Tamil Nadu and Uttarakhand.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Age-Specific Mortality Rates (ASMR)</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Age-specific Mortality Rate (ASMR), is defined as the number of deaths in a particular age-group per thousand population of the same age-group during the year.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong><em>5-14 Age Group</em></strong><br /> &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;<br /> &bull; At the national level, the ASDR for the 5-14 age group has been estimated to be 0.5 in 2018.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2018, the lowest ASDR for the 5-14 age group was found for Kerala and Assam (0.2 each) and the highest ASDR for the 5-14 age group was observed in case of Bihar, Odisha, Madhya and Chhattisgarh (0.7 each).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; At the national level, although ASDR for the 5-14 age group was the same for males and females in urban areas (0.4 each), ASDR for the 5-14 age group among females was 0.6 and among males was 0.5 in rural areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong><em>15-59 Age Group</em></strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; At the national level, ASDR for the 15-59 age group has been estimated to be 3.2 in rural areas and 2.3 in urban areas. At the national level, the ASDR for the 15-59 age group was 2.9 in 2018.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2018, the female ASDR for the 15-59 age group was lower than that of male ASDR for the 15-59 age group in all the states.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong><em>60 and Above Age Group</em></strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; At the national level, ASDR for the 60 and above age group has been estimated to be 42.6.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; ASDR for the 60 and above age group among males (45.9) was greater than that among females (39.5). The same trend existed for rural and urban areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; ASDR for the 60 and above age group has been estimated to be the highest in Chhattisgarh (58.9) and lowest in Delhi (28.3).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Sex Ratio at Birth (SRB)</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Sex Ratio at Birth (SRB) is defined as the number of female births per 1000 male births during the year.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The 3 years&rsquo; average of SRB (in the period 2016-18) has been estimated to be 899. At the national level, it was 900 in rural areas and 897 in urban areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; For 2016-18, the average SRB was the highest in Chhattisgarh at 958 and it was the lowest in Uttarakhand at 840.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In rural areas, Chhattisgarh had the highest SRB of 976 and Haryana had the lowest SRB of 840 in the period 2016-18. &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In urban areas, Madhya Pradesh had the highest SRB of 968 and Uttarakhand had the lowest SRB at 810 in the period 2016-18.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong><em>[Meghana Myadam and Sakhi Arun Jagdale, who are doing their MA in Development Studies (1st year) from Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Hyderabad, assisted the Inclusive Media for Change team in preparing the summary of the report by the Office of the Registrar General &amp; Census Commissioner<em>.</em> They did this work as part of their summer internship at the Inclusive Media for Change project in July 2020.]</em></strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="/upload/files/FAQ.pdf">click here</a> to access the [inside]FAQ on COVID-19 prepared by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare[/inside].</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="/upload/files/Containment%20Plan%20for%20Large%20Outbreaks%20of%20COVID19%20Final.pdf">click here</a> to access the [inside]Containment Plan for Large Outbreaks Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019[/inside] (COVID-19), which has been prepared by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">---</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/Background-Paper-COVID19.pdf">click here</a> to read the [inside]Background Note on COVID-19[/inside], which was prepared by Jan Swasthya Abhiyan (JSA) and All India People&rsquo;s Science Network(AIPSN), dated 16th March, 2020.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/Statement-COVID19.pdf">click here</a> to read the [inside]Statement on the COVID-19 pandemic[/inside], which was released by Jan Swasthya Abhiyan (JSA) and All India People&rsquo;s Science Network(AIPSN) on 16th March, 2020.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">---</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/High%20Level%20group%20of%20Health%20Sector.pdf" title="High Level group of Health Sector">click here</a> to access the Report of the [inside]High Level Group on Health Sector (2019), submitted to the Fifteenth Finance Commission of India[/inside]. The members of the High Level Group on Health were Dr. Randeep Guleria, Dr. Devi Shetty, Dr. Dileep Govind Mhaisekar, Dr. Naresh Trehan, Dr. Bhabatosh Biswas and Prof. K Srinath Reddy.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">---</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Press%20Note%20NSS%2075th%20Round%20Report%20Key%20Indicators%20of%20Social%20Consumption%20in%20India%20Health%20July%202017%20to%20June%202018%20released%20on%2023rd%20November%202019.pdf" title="Press Note NSS 75th Round Report Key Indicators of Social Consumption in India Health July 2017 to June 2018 released on 23rd November 2019">click here</a> to access the major findings of [inside]NSS 75th Round Report: Key Indicators of Social Consumption in India: Health, July 2017 to June 2018 (released on 23rd November 2019)[/inside].<br /> <br /> Kindly <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Key%20Indicators%20of%20Social%20Consumption%20in%20India%20Health.pdf" title="Key Indicators of Social Consumption in India Health">click here</a> to access the NSS 75th Round Report: Key Indicators of Social Consumption in India: Health, July 2017 to June 2018 (released on 23rd November 2019).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <div style="text-align:justify">The key findings of the [inside]2019 India TB report (released in September 2019)[/inside], which has been produced by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, are as follows (please <a href="https://tbcindia.gov.in/WriteReadData/India%20TB%20Report%202019.pdf">click here</a> and <a href="https://tbcindia.gov.in/index1.php?lang=1&amp;level=1&amp;sublinkid=4160&amp;lid=2807">click here</a> to access):</div> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> &bull; The country accounted for a quarter of the global tuberculosis (TB) burden with an estimated 27 lakh cases in 2018.<br /> <br /> &bull; In 2018, the country was able to achieve a total notification of 21.5 lakh TB cases, of which 25 percent was from private sector. Majority of the TB burden is among the working age group. Nearly 89 percent of TB cases came from the age group 15-69 years. About two-third of the TB patients were males.<br /> <br /> &bull; Among the notified, treatment was initiated for about 19.1 lakh cases (almost 90 percent), across both public and private sectors.<br /> <br /> &bull; HIV co-infection among TB patient was nearly fifty thousand cases amounting to TB-HIV co-infection rate of 3.4 percent.<br /> <br /> &bull; In 2018, TB notification has increased to 5.37 lakhs. This is an increase by 35 percent in notification from private sector in comparison to 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; Based on private drug sales data, it could be said that in 2016 there was about 1.59 times patients in the private sector as compared to the public sector (approximately 22.7 lakh patients in total).<br /> <br /> &bull; In India about 80 percent of the outpatient care is provided by private health care providers. Considering the quantum of private sector, it necessitates to leverage their capacity to expand health coverage.<br /> <br /> &bull; TB is a notifiable disease vide 2012 as per declaration of Government of India Order. This has expanded the ambit of TB surveillance covering all public as well as private health facilities. The healthcare providers shall notify every TB cases to local authorities such as District Health Officers/ Chief Medical Officers of a district and Municipal Health Officer of a municipal corporation. This notification should be done every month. The surveillance begins with the notification, and completed with acting on the information gathered. In <a href="tinymce/uploaded/TB%20notification%20Gazette%20of%20India%20dated%2019%20March%202018.pdf" title="TB notification Gazette of India dated 19 March 2018">March 2018</a>, the notification was published in Gazette of India, making it mandatory for private providers to notify TB patients and public health system to act upon it.<br /> <br /> &bull; Uttar Pradesh, with 17 percent of population of the country, is the largest contributor to TB cases, with 20 percent of the total notifications, accounting for about 4.2 lakh cases (187 cases per lakh population).<br /> <br /> &bull; Delhi and Chandigarh stand apart from all other states and UTs with regard to notification rates relative to their resident population. Annual notification rates in Delhi and Chandigarh were 504 cases per lakh population and 496 cases per lakh population, respectively. This is because patients residing in other parts of the country are diagnosed/ notified from these two UTs.<br /> <br /> &bull; In 2018, the Revised National Tuberculosis Control Programme (RNTCP) notified 21.5 lakh TB cases, a 16 percent increase over 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; The largest ever National Drug Resistance Survey in the world for 13 anti-TB drugs has been completed and it has indicated about 6.2 percent prevalence of drug resistant TB in the country among all TB patients.<br /> <br /> &bull; The Government of India is prioritising resource allocations for TB in the country with more than Rs. 12,000 crores being invested in the implementation of the National Strategic Plan to End TB 2017-2025. The government has started the Nikshay Poshan Yojana (NPY) for nutritional support to TB patients.&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; It is expected that the country would be able to cover all TB cases through the online notification system -- NIKSHAY.<br /> &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The ending preventable maternal mortality (EPMM) target for reducing the global maternal mortality ratio (MMRatio) by 2030 was adopted as Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) target 3.1: reduce global MMRatio to less than 70 per lakh live births by 2030. Having targets for mortality reduction is important, but accurate measurement of maternal mortality remains challenging and many deaths still go uncounted. Many countries still lack well-functioning civil registration and vital statistics (CRVS) systems, and where such systems do exist, reporting errors &ndash; whether incompleteness (unregistered deaths, also known as &ldquo;missing&rdquo;) or misclassification of cause of death &ndash; continue to pose a major challenge to data accuracy. The report entitled &#39;Trends in Maternal Mortality 2000 to 2017: Estimates by World Health Orgnization (WHO), United Nations Children&#39;s Fund (UNICEF), World Bank Group, United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) and the United Nations Population Division presents internationally comparable global, regional and country-level estimates and trends for maternal mortality between 2000 and 2017.<br /> <br /> The new estimates presented in this report supersede all previously published estimates for years that fall within the same time period. Care should be taken to use only these estimates for the interpretation of trends in maternal mortality from 2000 to 2017; due to modifications in methodology and data availability, differences between these and previous estimates should not be interpreted as representing time trends. In addition, when interpreting changes in MMRatios over time, one should take into consideration that it is easier to reduce the MMRatio when the level is high than when the MMRatio level is already low.<br /> <br /> Please note that Maternal Mortality Ratio is the number of women who die&nbsp; from pregnancy-related causes while pregnant or within 42 days of pregnancy termination per 100,000 live births.<br /> <br /> The key findings of the report entitled [inside]Trends in Maternal Mortality 2000 to 2017: Estimates by WHO, UNICEF, World Bank Group, UNFPA and the United Nations Population Division (released in September 2019)[/inside] are as follows (please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Maternal%20mortality%20Levels%20and%20trends%202000%20to%202017%20Executive%20Summary.pdf" title="Maternal mortality Levels and trends 2000 to 2017 Executive Summary">click here</a> and <a href="https://www.unfpa.org/featured-publication/trends-maternal-mortality-2000-2017">click here</a> to access):&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; Nigeria and India had the highest estimated numbers of maternal deaths, accounting for approximately one-third (35 percent) of estimated&nbsp; global maternal deaths in 2017, with approximately 67,000 and 35,000 maternal deaths (23 percent and 12 percent of global maternal deaths), respectively.<br /> <br /> &bull; Maternal Mortality Ratio for India was 370 in 2000, 286 in 2005, 210 in&nbsp; 2010, 158 in 2015 and 145 in 2017. So, the MMRatio for the country reduced by almost 61 percent between 2000 and 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; MMRatio for China was 59 in 2000, 44 in 2005, 36 in 2010, 30 in 2015 and 29 in 2017. Hence, the MMRatio for China reduced by around 51 percent between 2000 and 2017.&nbsp;&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; The absolute difference in MMRatio between India and China has lessened from 311 in 2000 to 116 in 2017. The country&#39;s MMRatio&nbsp; was 6.3 times that of China in 2000, which has reduced to 5 times in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; MMRatio for Bangladesh was 434 in 2000, 343 in 2005, 258 in 2010, 200 in 2015 and 173 in 2017. Therefore, the MMRatio for Bangladesh decreased by nearly 60 percent between 2000 and 2017.&nbsp;&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; The absolute gap in MMRatio between Bangladesh and India has reduced from 64 in 2000 to 28 in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; MMRatio for Sri Lanka was 56 in 2000, 45 in 2005, 38 in 2010, 36 in 2015 and 36 in 2017. So, the MMRatio for Sri Lanka reduced by roughly 36 percent between 2000 and 2017.&nbsp;&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; MMRatio for Pakistan was 286 in 2000, 237 in 2005, 191 in 2010, 154 in 2015 and 140 in 2017. Therefore, the MMRatio for Pakistan declined by roughly 51 percent between 2000 and 2017.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; MMRatio for South Asia was 395 in 2000, 309 in 2005, 235 in 2010, 179 in 2015 and 163 in 2017. Hence, the MMRatio for South Asia reduced by around 59 percent between 2000 and 2017.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Sub-Saharan Africa and Southern Asia accounted for approximately 86 percent (2,54,000) of the estimated global maternal deaths in 2017 with sub-Saharan Africa alone accounting for roughly 66 percent (1,96,000), while Southern Asia accounted for nearly 20 percent (58,000). South-Eastern Asia, in addition, accounted for over 5 percent of global maternal deaths (16,000).<br /> &nbsp;&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to the [inside]National Health Profile 2018, 13th Issue[/inside], Central Bureau of Health Intelligence, Ministry of Health &amp; Family Welfare (please <a href="https://im4change.org/docs/900National%20Health%20Profile%202018%2013th%20Issue%20Central%20Bureau%20of%20Health%20Intelligence%20Ministry%20of%20Health%20&amp;%20Family%20Welfare.pdf">click here</a> to access):<br /> <br /> <strong>Demographic Indicators</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; The Infant Mortality Rate (IMR) per 1,000 live births has declined considerably from 74 infant deaths in 1994 to 34 infant deaths in 2016. There is a huge gap between IMR in rural areas (38 infant deaths per 1,000 live births) and urban areas (23 infant deaths per 1000 live births).<br /> <br /> &bull; Among the states, the lowest IMR per 1,000 live births in 2016 was found in Goa (8), followed by Kerala (10) and Manipur (11). The highest IMR per 1,000 live births in 2015 was found in Madhya Pradesh (47), followed by both Assam and Odisha (44 each).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The life expectancy of life at birth has increased from 49.7 years in 1970-75 to 68.3 years in 2011-15. In the period 2011-15, the life expectancy for females was 70.0 years and 66.9 years for males.<br /> <br /> &bull; In the period 2011-15, the life expectancy in the rural areas was 67.1 years and in the urban areas it was 71.9 years.<br /> <br /> &bull; The Maternal Mortality Ratio (MMRatio) per 1,00,000 livebirths has decreased from 178 maternal deaths during 2010-12 to 167 maternal deaths during 2011-13. In 2011-13, the MMRatio per 1,00,000 livebirths was the highest in Assam i.e. 300 maternal deaths and lowest in Kerala i.e. 61 maternal deaths.<br /> <br /> &bull; The country&#39;s birth rate per 1,000 estimated mid-year population has fallen from 29.5 livebirths in 1991 to 20.4 livebirths in 2016. Birth rate per 1,000 estimated mid-year population in rural areas was 22.1 livebirths and in urban areas it was 17.0 livebirths in 2016.<br /> <br /> &bull; India&#39;s natural growth rate per 1,000 mid-year population has declined from 19.7 in 1991 to 14.0 in 2016.<br /> <br /> &bull; The proportion of urban population to India&#39;s total population has increased from 25.7 percent in 1991 to 27.81 percent in 2001, and further increased to 31.14 in 2011.<br /> <br /> &bull; The country&#39;s population density has increased from 267 persons per square kilometer in 1991 to 325 persons per square kilometer in 2001, and further rose to 382 persons per square kilometer in 2011.<br /> <br /> &bull; The decadal growth rate of India&#39;s population has fallen from 23.87 percent in 1981-1991 to 21.54 percent in 1991-2001, and further declined to 17.7 percent in 2001-2011.<br /> <br /> <strong>Health Status Indicators</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; In 2017, maximum number of malaria cases was reported in Odisha (3,52,140 cases) and maximum number of deaths was reported in West Bengal (29 deaths).<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of cases of malaria has changed from 8,81,730 in 2013 to 8,42,095 in 2017. The total number of deaths due to malaria has changed from 440 in 2013 to 104 in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; Out of the overall cases of Kala-azar reported in 2017, 72 percent of the cases were reported in Bihar. The total number of cases of Kala-azar has fallen from 13,869 in 2013 to 5,758 in 2017. Likewise, the total number of deaths from Kala-azar has fallen from 20 in 2013 to zero in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; There has been a considerable fall in the number of swine flu cases/ deaths in the year 2014 (viz. 937) as compared with 2012 (viz. 5,044) &amp; 2013 (viz. 5,253). However, the number of cases (42,592) and deaths (2,990) have drastically increased in the year 2015. In 2016, the cases decreased to 1786 and again increased to 38,811 in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; A total of 63,679 cases of chikungunya were reported in 2017 as compared with 64,057 cases in 2016. Most chikungunya cases in 2017 were reported from Karnataka (32,170), followed by Gujarat (7,807) and Maharashtra (7,639).<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of cases and deaths due to chicken pox were 74,035 and 92, respectively in 2017. Kerala accounted for maximum number of cases (30,941) and West Bengal accounted for maximum number of deaths (53) due to chicken pox in 2017.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of cases of Acute Encephalitis Syndrome has increased from 7,825 in 2013 to 13,036 in 2017. The total number of deaths due to Acute Encephalitis Syndrome has decreased from 1,273 in 2013 to 1,010 in 2017. Uttar Pradesh reported maximum numbers of cases (4,749) and maximum number of deaths (593) in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of cases of Japanese Encephalitis has almost doubled from 1,086 in 2013 to 2,180 in 2017. The total number of deaths due to Japanese Encephalitis has increased from 202 in 2013 to 252 in 2017. Uttar Pradesh reported maximum numbers of cases (693) and maximum number of deaths (93) in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of cases and deaths due to encephalitis were 12,485 and 626, respectively in 2017. Assam accounted for maximum number of cases (5,525) and Uttar Pradesh accounted for maximum number of deaths (246) due to chicken pox in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of cases and deaths due to viral meningitis were 7,559 and 121, respectively in 2017. Andhra Pradesh accounted for maximum number of cases (1,493) and maximum number of deaths (33) due to viral meningitis in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of cases of dengue has almost doubled from 75,808 in 2013 to 1,57,996 in 2017. The total number of deaths due to dengue has increased from 193 in 2013 to 253 in 2017. Tamil Nadu reported maximum numbers of cases (23,294) and maximum number of deaths (65) in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; As per the National Programme for Prevention and Control of Cancer, Diabetes, Cardiovascular Diseases and Stroke (NPCDCS), out of 3,57,23,660 patients who attended non-communicable disease (NCD) clinics in 2017, 8.41 percent people are diagnosed with diabetes, 10.22 percent are diagnosed with hypertension (high blood pressure), 0.37% are diagnosed with cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), 0.13 percent are diagnosed with stroke and 0.11 percent are diagnosed with common cancers (including oral, cervical and breast cancer).<br /> <br /> &bull; During the year 2015, the lives of 4,13,457 and 1,33,623 people are cut short as a result of accidental and suicide cases, respectively. Many more people suffer non-fatal injuries, with many incurring a disability as a result of their injury.<br /> <br /> &bull; Suicide rates are increasing significantly for young adults including male, female &amp; transgender in a wider population. The maximum number of suicide cases (44,593) is reported between the age-group 30-45 years.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of disabled persons in India is 26,814,994 as per the Census 2011.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of cases and deaths due to snake bite were 1,42,366 and 948 respectively in 2017.<br /> <br /> <strong>Health Financing in India</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; The total public expenditure on health for the year 2015-16 stood at Rs 1.4 lakh crores (actual).<br /> <br /> &bull; The per capita public expenditure (actual) on health in nominal terms has gone up from Rs. 621 in 2009-10 to Rs. 1,112 in 2015-16.<br /> <br /> &bull; Public expenditure on health (includes health sector expenditure by Centre and States/UTs) as a percentage of GDP was 1.02 percent in 2015-16. There is no significant change in public expenditure on health as a percentage of GDP since 2009-10.<br /> <br /> &bull; The Centre-State share in total public expenditure on health was 31:69 in 2015-16, which used to be 36:64 in 2009-10.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total public expenditure on health (excluding other Central Ministries) in 2015-16 was Rs. 1,40,054 crores, with Medical and Public Health comprising the major share (78.7 percent). The share of Family Welfare was 12.6 percent.<br /> <br /> &bull; Urban and rural health services constituted 71 percent of the public expenditure on medical and public health in 2015-16.<br /> <br /> &bull; The North-Eastern states had the highest (viz. Rs. 2,878 per capita) and Empowered Action Group (EAG) states (including Assam) had the lowest (viz. Rs. 871 per capita) average per capita public expenditure on health in 2015-16 (excluding UTs). For example, in Mizoram the per capita health expenditure was Rs. 5862 (actual) in 2015-16. However, in Bihar, the per capita health expenditure was Rs. 491 (actual) in 2015-16.<br /> <br /> &bull; The North-Eastern states had the highest public health expenditure as a percentage of Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP) in 2015-16 (2.76 percent). Public health expenditure as a percentage of GSDP stood at 1.36 percent for EAG states (including Assam) and 0.76 percent for major non-EAG states.<br /> <br /> &bull; Based on the Health Survey (71st round) conducted by National Sample Service Office (NSSO), the average medical expenditure incurred during stay at hospital between January, 2013 and June, 2014 was Rs. 14,935 for rural and Rs. 24,436 for urban India.<br /> <br /> &bull; The average total medical expenditure per child birth as in-patient over the last 365 days (survey conducted from January to June 2014) in a public hospital in rural areas was Rs. 1,587 and in urban areas is Rs. 2,117.<br /> <br /> &bull; Around 43 crore individuals were covered under any health insurance in the year 2016-17. This amounts to 34 percent of the total population of India. Almost 79 percent of them were covered by public insurance companies.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; Overall, 77 percent of all persons covered with insurance fall under Government-sponsored schemes.<br /> <br /> &bull; Public insurance companies had a higher share of coverage and premium for all types of health insurance policies, except family floater policies including individual policies.<br /> <br /> &bull; Compared to countries that have either Universal Health Coverage or moving towards it, India&rsquo;s per capita public spending on health is low.<br /> <br /> <strong>Human Resources in Health Sector</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; The number of registered allopathic doctors possessing recognized medical qualifications (under Indian Medical Council Act) and registered with state medical council for the years 2016 and 2017 were 25,282 and 17,982, respectively. Upto 2017, the total number of doctors possessing recognised medical qualifications (under the IMC Act) registered with the State Medical Councils/ Medical Council of India is 10,41,395.&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; In 2017, the average population served per government allopathic doctor was 11,082. The state having the highest average population served per government allopathic doctor in 2017 was Bihar (28,391), followed by Uttar Pradesh (19,962) and Jharkhand (18,518).&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; In 2017, the average population served per government dental surgeon was 1,76,004. The state having the highest average population served per government dental surgeon in 2017 was Chhattisgarh (25,87,900), followed by Maharashtra (14,83,150) and Uttar Pradesh (11,41,869).<br /> <br /> &bull; The number of dental surgeon registered with Central/ State Dental Councils of India has increased from 93,332 in 2008 to 2,51,207 as on 31st December, 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; Over the years with gaining popularity, there is a steady rise in total number of registered AYUSH doctors in India from 7,71,468 in 2016 to 7,73,668 in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; There was a total of 8,41,279 Auxilliary Nurse Midwives (ANMs) serving in the country as on 31st December, 2016.<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 31st December, 2016, the highest number of registered ANMs among the states were found in Andhra Pradesh (1,38,435), followed by Rajasthan (1,08,688) and Odisha (62,159).<br /> <br /> &bull; There are 19,80,536 Registered Nurses and Registered Midwives (RN &amp; RM) and 56,367 Lady Health Visitors (LHV) serving in the country as on 31st December, 2016.<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 31st December, 2016, the highest number of registered RN &amp; RM among the states were found in Tamil Nadu (2,62,718), followed by Kerala (2,46,161) and Andhra Pradesh (2,32,621).<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 13th November, 2017, the total number of registered pharmacists operating in the country is 9,07,132.<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 13th November, 2017, the highest number of registered pharmacists among the states were found in Maharashtra (2,03,089), followed by Gujarat (1,19,445) and Andhra Pradesh (1,15,754).<br /> <br /> &bull; In rural areas, the total number of allopathic doctors at primary health centres (PHCs) was 27,124 as on 31st March, 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 31st March, 2017, among the states, the highest number of allopathic doctors at PHCs was found in Maharashtra (2,929), followed by Tamil Nadu (2,759) and Rajasthan (2,382).<br /> <br /> &bull; In rural areas, the total number of specialists at community health centres (CHCs) is 4,156 as on 31st March, 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 31st March, 2017, among the states, the highest number of specialists at CHCs is found in Maharashtra (508), followed by Karnataka (498) and Rajasthan (497).<br /> <br /> <strong>Health Infrastructure</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; Medical education infrastructures in the country have shown rapid growth during the last 26 years. The country has 476 medical colleges, 313 dental colleges for Bachelor of Dental Surgery (BDS) &amp; 249 dental colleges for Master of Dental Surgery (MDS). There has been a total admission of 52,646 in 476 Medical Colleges and 27,060 in BDS and 6,233 in MDS during 2017-18.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of dental colleges for BDS has increased from 77 in 1994-95 to 313 in 2017-18 viz. by 4.1 times. The total number of dental colleges for MDS has increased from 32 in 1994-95 to 249 in 2017-18 viz. by 7.8 times.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of admission in dental colleges for BDS has risen from 1,987 in 1994-95 to 27,060 in 2017-18 viz. by 13.6 times. The total number of admission in dental colleges for MDS has risen from 225 in 1994-95 to 6,233 in 2017-18 viz. 27.7 times.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of medical colleges in India has increased from 146 in 1991-92 to 476 in 2017-18 viz. by 3.3 times.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of male students taking admissions in medical colleges has gone up from 7,468 in 1991-92 to 26,082 in 2017-18 viz. by 3.5 times. The total number of female students taking admissions in medical colleges has gone up from 4,731 in 1991-92 to 26,564 in 2017-18 viz. by 5.6 times.<br /> <br /> &bull; India has 3,215 institutions producing 1,29,926 General Nurse Midwives annually and 777 colleges for Pharmacy (Diploma) with an intake capacity of 46,795 as on 31st October, 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; There are 23,582 government hospitals having 7,10,761 beds in the country. It means that there is just one bed for 1,826 Indians in government hospitals, assuming that the projected population in 2018 being 129,80,41,000 as on 1st March, 2018.<br /> <br /> &bull; Around 19,810 government hospitals are in rural areas with 2,79,588 beds and 3,772 government hospitals are in urban areas with 4,31,173 beds.<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 31st March, 2017, there were 1,56,231 sub-centres, 25,650 primary health centres (PHCs) and 5,624 community health centres (CHCs).<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 31st March, 2017, most sub-centres were found in Uttar Pradesh (20,521), followed by Rajasthan (14,406) and Maharashtra (10,580).&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 31st March, 2017, most PHCs were found in Uttar Pradesh (3,621), followed by Karnataka (2,359) and Rajasthan (2,079).&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 31st March, 2017, most CHCs were found in Uttar Pradesh (822), followed by Rajasthan (579) and Tamil Nadu (385).<br /> <br /> &bull; Medical care facilities under AYUSH by management status i.e. dispensaries &amp; hospitals were 27,698 and 3,943 respectively, as on 1st April, 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of licensed blood banks in the country till June, 2017 was 2,903. The highest number of blood banks are found in Maharashtra (328), followed by Uttar Pradesh (294) and Tamil Nadu (291).&nbsp;&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; In total, there were 469 eye banks (362 privately run and 107 government run) in the country as on 4th January, 2018. Most eye banks were found in Maharashtra (166), followed by Karnataka (39) and Madhya Pradesh (36).<br /> <br /> <strong>Achievement of health-related SDGs targets</strong><br /> <br /> &bull; On most targets pertaining to health-related Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), India lags behind the target. For example, although the target for coverage of essential health services is 100 percent (indicator no. 3.8.1), in our country only 57 percent of the population is covered by such services. Similarly, although the target for Maternal Mortality Ratio (per 1,00,000 live births) is 70 by 2030 (indicator no. 3.1.1), MMRatio in India presently is 174.<br /> <br /> &bull; The target for Under-five mortality rate (per 1000 live births) is 25 by 2030 (indicator no. 3.2.1). However, U5MR in the country is 47.7.<br /> <br /> &bull; In case of many SDG-related indicators such as Suicide mortality rate (per 100,000 population) (indicator no. 3.4.2) or say Adolescent birth rate (per 1000 women aged 15-19 years) (indicator no. 3.7.2), the SDG target is yet to be determined.<br /> <br /> &bull; For many SDG-related indicators such as Hepatitis B incidence (indicator no. 3.3.4) or say Proportion of the population with access to affordable medicines and vaccines on a sustainable basis (indicator no. 3.b.1), the data for India is either not provided or remain unavailable.<br /> <br /> <strong>Table: Current Status of Health-related Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Target - Indian Scenario</strong><br /> <br /> <img alt="SDGs" src="tinymce/uploaded/SDGs_1.jpg" style="height:242px; width:334px" /><br /> <br /> <em><strong>Source:</strong> Monitoring Health in the Sustainable Development Goals: 2017, World Health Organization, Regional Office for South East Asia, as quoted in the National Health Profile 2018, please <a href="https://bit.ly/2MmfuuK">click here</a> to access, page no. 288<br /> <br /> Report of the Inter-Agency and Expert Group on Sustainable Development Goal Indicators (E/CN.3/2016/2/Rev.1), please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Final%20list%20of%20SDG%20indicators.pdf">click here</a> to access </em><br /> <br /> <br /> &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">While state-level trends for some important health indicators have been available in India, a comprehensive assessment of the diseases causing the most premature deaths and disability in each state, the risk factors responsible for this burden, and their time trends have not been available in a single standardised framework. The India State-level Disease Burden Initiative was launched in October 2015 to address this crucial knowledge gap with support from the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare of the Government of India. This is a collaborative effort between the Indian Council of Medical Research, Public Health Foundation of India, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, and experts and stakeholders from about 100 institutions across India. The work of this Initiative is overseen by an Advisory Board consisting of eminent policymakers and involves extensive engagement of 14 domain expert groups with the estimation process. Based on intense work over two years, this report describes the distribution and trends of diseases and risk factors for every state of India from 1990 to 2016.<br /> <br /> The estimates were produced as part of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. The analytical methods of this study have been standardised over two decades of scientific work, which has been reported in over 16,000 peer-reviewed publications, making it the most widely used approach globally for disease burden estimation. These methods enable standardised comparisons of health loss caused by different diseases and risk factors, between geographic units, sexes, and age groups, and over time in a unified framework. The key metric used for this comparison is disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), which is the sum of the number of years of life lost due to premature death and a weighted measure of the years lived with disability due to a disease or injury. The use of DALYs to track disease burden is recommended by India&rsquo;s National Health Policy of 2017.<br /> <br /> It is to be noted that attributable burden is the share of the burden of a disease that can be estimated to occur due to exposure to a particular risk factor.<br /> <br /> According to the report entitled [inside]India: Health of the Nation&rsquo;s States - The India State-Level Disease Burden Initiative, Disease Burden Trends in the States of India 1990 to 2016 (released in October, 2017) [/inside], prepared by Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), Public Health Foundation of India (PHFI), Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) and Ministry of Health &amp; Family Welfare (MoHFW), please <a href="https://im4change.org/docs/11592India_Health_of.pdf">click here</a> to access:<br /> <br /> <em>Health status improving, but major inequalities between states</em><br /> <br /> &bull; Life expectancy at birth improved in India from 59.7 years in 1990 to 70.3 years in 2016 for females, and from 58.3 years to 66.9 years for males. There were, however, continuing inequalities between states, with a range of 66.8 years in Uttar Pradesh to 78.7 years in Kerala for females, and from 63.6 years in Assam to 73.8 years in Kerala for males in 2016.<br /> <br /> &bull; The per person disease burden measured as DALYs rate dropped by 36 percent from 1990 to 2016 in India, after adjusting for the changes in the population age structure during this period. But there was an almost two-fold difference in this disease burden rate between the states in 2016, with Assam, Uttar Pradesh, and Chhattisgarh having the highest rates, and Kerala and Goa the lowest rates.<br /> <br /> &bull; While the disease burden rate in India has improved since 1990, it was 72 percent higher per person than in Sri Lanka or China in 2016.<br /> <br /> &bull; The under-5 mortality rate has reduced substantially from 1990 in all states, but there was a four-fold difference in this rate between the highest in Assam and Uttar Pradesh as compared with the lowest in Kerala in 2016, highlighting the vast health inequalities between the states.<br /> <br /> <em>Large differences between states in the changing disease profile</em><br /> <br /> &bull; Of the total disease burden in India measured as DALYs, 61 percent was due to communicable, maternal, neonatal, and nutritional diseases (termed infectious and associated diseases in this summary for simplicity) in 1990, which dropped to 33 percent in 2016.<br /> <br /> &bull; There was a corresponding increase in the contribution of non-communicable diseases from 30 percent of the total disease burden in 1990 to 55 percent in 2016, and of injuries from 9 percent to 12 percent.<br /> <br /> &bull; Infectious and associated diseases made up the majority of disease burden in most of the states in 1990, but this was less than half in all states in 2016. However, the year when infectious and associated diseases transitioned to less than half of the total disease burden ranged from 1986 to 2010 for the various state groups in different stages of this transition.<br /> <br /> &bull; The wide variations between the states in this epidemiological transition are reflected in the range of the contribution of major disease groups to the total disease burden in 2016: 48 percent to 75 percent for non-communicable diseases, 14 percent to 43 percent for infectious and associated diseases, and 9 percent to 14 percent for injuries. Kerala, Goa, and Tamil Nadu have the largest dominance of non-communicable diseases and injuries over infectious and associated diseases, whereas this dominance is present but relatively the lowest in Bihar, Jharkhand, Uttar Pradesh, and Rajasthan.<br /> <br /> &bull; It is to be noted that epidemiological transition level (ETL) is based on the ratio of the number of DALYs in a population due to communicable, maternal, neonatal, and nutritional diseases to the number of DALYs due to non-communicable diseases and injuries together. A decreasing ratio indicates advancing epidemiological transition with an increasing relative burden from non-communicable diseases as compared with communicable, maternal, neonatal, and nutritional diseases.<br /> <br /> &bull; The major EAG states of Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh both have a relatively lower level of development indicators and are at a similar less advanced epidemiological transition stage. However, Uttar Pradesh had 50 percent higher disease burden per person from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 54 percent higher burden from tuberculosis, and 30 percent higher burden from diarrhoeal diseases, whereas Madhya Pradesh had 76% higher disease burden per person from stroke. The cardiovascular risks were generally higher in Madhya Pradesh, and the unsafe water and sanitation risk was relatively higher in Uttar Pradesh.<br /> <br /> &bull; The two North-East India states of Manipur and Tripura are both at a lower-middle stage of epidemiological transition but have quite different disease burden rates from specific leading diseases. Tripura had 49% higher per person burden from ischaemic heart disease, 52 percent higher from stroke, 64 percent higher from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 159 percent higher from iron-deficiency anaemia, 59 percent higher from lower respiratory infections, and 56 percent higher from neonatal disorders. Manipur, on the other hand, had 88 percent higher per person burden from tuberculosis and 38 percent higher from road injuries. Regarding the level of risks, child and maternal malnutrition, air pollution, and several of the cardiovascular risks were higher in Tripura.<br /> <br /> &bull; The two adjoining north Indian states of Himachal Pradesh and Punjab both have a relatively higher level of development indicators and are at a similar more advanced epidemiological transition stage. However, there were striking differences between them in the level of burden from specific leading diseases. Punjab had 157 percent higher per person burden from diabetes, 134 percent higher burden from ischaemic heart disease, 49 percent higher burden from stroke, and 56 percent higher burden from road injuries. On the other hand, Himachal Pradesh had 63 percent higher per person burden from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Consistent with these findings, Punjab had substantially higher levels of cardiovascular risks than Himachal Pradesh.<br /> <br /> <em>Rising burden of non-communicable diseases in all states</em><br /> <br /> &bull; The contribution of most of the major non-communicable disease groups to the total disease burden has increased all over India since 1990, including cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, chronic respiratory diseases, mental health and neurological disorders, cancers, musculoskeletal disorders, and chronic kidney disease.<br /> <br /> &bull; Among the leading non-communicable diseases, the largest disease burden or DALY rate increase from 1990 to 2016 was observed for diabetes, at 80 percent, and ischaemic heart disease, at 34 percent. In 2016, three of the five leading individual causes of disease burden in India were non-communicable, with ischaemic heart disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as the top two causes and stroke as the fifth leading cause.<br /> <br /> &bull; The range of disease burden or DALY rate among the states in 2016 was 9 fold for ischaemic heart disease, 4 fold for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and 6 fold for stroke, and 4 fold for diabetes across India. While ischaemic heart disease and diabetes generally had higher DALY rates in states that are at a more advanced epidemiological transition stage toward non-communicable diseases, the DALY rates of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were generally higher in the EAG states that are at a relatively less advanced epidemiological transition stage.<br /> <br /> &bull; The DALY rates of stroke varied across the states without any consistent pattern in relation to the stage of epidemiological transition. This variety of trends of the different major non-communicable diseases indicates that policy and health system interventions to tackle their increasing burden have to be informed by the specific trends in each state.<br /> <br /> <em>Infectious and associated diseases reducing, but still high in many states</em><br /> <br /> &bull; The burden of most infectious and associated diseases reduced in India from 1990 to 2016, but five of the ten individual leading causes of disease burden in India in 2016 still belonged to this group: diarrhoeal diseases, lower respiratory infections, iron-deficiency anaemia, preterm birth complications, and tuberculosis.<br /> <br /> &bull; The burden caused by these conditions generally continues to be much higher in the Empowered Action Group (EAG) and North-East state groups than in the other states, but there were notable variations between the states within these groups as well.<br /> <br /> &bull; One should noted that the Empowered Action Group (EAG) states is a group of eight states that receive special development effort attention from the Government of India, namely, Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Odisha, Rajasthan, Uttarakhand, and Uttar Pradesh.<br /> <br /> &bull; For India as whole, the disease burden or DALY rate for diarrhoeal diseases, iron-deficiency anaemia, and tuberculosis was 2.5 to 3.5 times higher than the average globally for other geographies at a similar level of development, indicating that this burden can be brought down substantially.<br /> <br /> <em>Increasing but variable burden of injuries among states</em><br /> <br /> &bull; The contribution of injuries to the total disease burden has increased in most states since 1990. The highest proportion of disease burden due to injuries is in young adults. Road injuries and self-harm, which includes suicides and non-fatal outcomes of self-harm, are the leading contributors to the injury burden in India.<br /> <br /> &bull; The range of disease burden or DALY rate varied 3 fold for road injuries and 6 fold for self-harm among the states of India in 2016.<br /> <br /> &bull; The burden due to road injuries was much higher in males than in females. The DALY rate for self-harm for India as a whole was 1.8 times higher than the average globally for other geographies at a similar level of development in 2016.<br /> <br /> <em>Rising risks for cardiovascular diseases and diabetes</em><br /> <br /> &bull; Of the total disease burden in India in 1990, a tenth was caused by a group of risks including unhealthy diet, high blood pressure, high blood sugar, high cholesterol, and overweight, which mainly contribute to ischaemic heart disease, stroke, and diabetes. The contribution of this group of risks increased massively to a quarter of the total disease burden in India in 2016.<br /> <br /> &bull; The combination of these risks was highest in Punjab, Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Andhra Pradesh, and Maharashtra in 2016, but importantly, the contribution of these risks has increased in every state of the country since 1990.<br /> <br /> &bull; The other significant contributor to cardiovascular diseases and diabetes, as well as to cancers and some other diseases, is tobacco use, which was responsible for 6% of the total disease burden in India in 2016. All of these risks are generally higher in males than in females.<br /> <br /> <em>Unacceptably high risk of child and maternal malnutrition</em><br /> <br /> &bull; While the disease burden due to child and maternal malnutrition has dropped in India substantially since 1990, this is still the single largest risk factor, responsible for 15% of the total disease burden in India in 2016. This burden is highest in the major EAG states and Assam, and is higher in females than in males.<br /> <br /> &bull; Child and maternal malnutrition contributes to disease burden mainly through increasing the risk of neonatal disorders, nutritional deficiencies, diarrhoeal diseases, lower respiratory infections, and other common infections.<br /> <br /> &bull; As a stark contrast, the disease burden due to child and maternal malnutrition in India was 12 times higher per person than in China in 2016. Kerala had the lowest burden due to this risk among the Indian states, but even this was 2.7 times higher per person than in China.<br /> <br /> <em>Unsafe water and sanitation improving, but not enough yet</em><br /> <br /> &bull; Unsafe water and sanitation was the second leading risk responsible for disease burden in India in 1990, but dropped to the seventh leading risk in 2016, contributing 5 percent of the total disease burden, mainly through diarrhoeal diseases and other infections.<br /> <br /> &bull; Risk factors means potentially modifiable causes of disease and injury.<br /> <br /> &bull; The burden due to this risk is also highest in several EAG states and Assam, and higher in females than in males. The improvement in exposure to this risk from 1990 to 2016 was least in the EAG states, indicating that higher focus is needed in these states for more rapid improvements.<br /> <br /> &bull; The per person disease burden due to unsafe water and sanitation was 40 times higher in India than in China in 2016.<br /> <br /> <em>Household air pollution improving, outdoor air pollution worsening</em><br /> <br /> &bull; The contribution of air pollution to disease burden remained high in India between 1990 and 2016, with levels of exposure among the highest in the world. It causes burden through a mix of non-communicable and infectious diseases, mainly cardiovascular diseases, chronic respiratory diseases, and lower respiratory infections.<br /> <br /> &bull; The burden of household air pollution decreased during the period 1990-2016 due to decreasing use of solid fuels for cooking, and that of outdoor air pollution increased due to a variety of pollutants from power production, industry, vehicles, construction, and waste burning.<br /> <br /> &bull; Household air pollution was responsible for 5 percent of the total disease burden in India in 2016, and outdoor air pollution for 6 percent. The burden due to household air pollution is highest in the EAG states, where its improvement since 1990 has also been the slowest. On the other hand, the burden due to outdoor air pollution is highest in a mix of northern states, including Haryana, Uttar Pradesh, Punjab, Rajasthan, Bihar, and West Bengal.<br /> &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> The report entitled National Health Accounts: Estimates for India 2014-15 (released in October, 2017) provides healthcare expenditures in India based on National Health Accounts Guidelines for India, 2016 (with refinements where required) that adhere to System of Health Accounts 2011 (SHA 2011), a global standard framework for producing health accounts. The NHA estimates for India is a result of an institutionalised process wherein, the boundaries, data sources, classification codes and estimation methodology have all been standardised in consultation with national and international experts under the guidance of NHA Expert Group for India.<br /> <br /> The NHA provides key indicators to understand financing of health system in the country and allows for comparison with other countries. The National Health Policy 2017 sets out several goals related to healthcare financing and emphasizes the need to track expenditures on health through a robust system of National Health Accounts. The production of annual NHA estimates builds a database for tracking trends in allocations for health by union/state governments and estimate the burden of out-of-pocket payments.<br /> <br /> The key findings of the report entitled [inside]National Health Accounts: Estimates for India 2014-15 (released in October, 2017)[/inside], which has been prepared by the National Health Accounts Technical Secretariat, National Health Systems Resource Centre and Ministry of Health and Family Welfare&nbsp; are as follows (please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/National%20Health%20Accounts%20Estimates%20Report%202014-15.pdf" title="National Health Accounts Estimates for India 2014-15">click here</a> to access):<br /> <br /> &bull; The Total Health Expenditure (THE) for India is estimated at Rs. 4,83,259 crores (3.89 percent of GDP and Rs. 3,826 per capita) for the year 2014-15. THE constitutes current and capital expenditures incurred by Government and Private Sources including External/Donor funds. Current Health Expenditure (CHE) is Rs. 4,51,286 crores (93.4 percent of THE) and capital expenditures is Rs. 31,973 crores (6.6 percent of THE).<br /> <br /> &bull; The Government Health Expenditure (GHE) including capital expenditure is Rs. 1,39,949 crores (29 percent of THE, 1.13 percent GDP and Rs. 1,108 per capita) for the year 2014-15. This amounts to about 3.94 percent of General Government Expenditure in 2014-15. Of the GHE, Union Government share is 37 percent and State Government share is 63 percent. Union Government Expenditure on National Health Mission is Rs. 20,199 crores, Defence Medical Services Rs. 6,695 crores, Railway Health Services is Rs. 2,111 crores, Central Government Health Scheme (CGHS) is Rs. 2,300 crores and Ex Servicemen Contributory Health Scheme (ECHS) is Rs. 2,243 crores.<br /> <br /> &bull; The Out-of-Pocket Expenditure (OOPE) on health by households is Rs. 3,02,425 crores (62.6 percent of THE, 2.4 percent of GDP, Rs. 2,394 per capita) for the year 2014-15. Private Health Insurance expenditure is Rs. 17,755 crores (3.7 percent of THE) for the year 2014-15.<br /> <br /> &bull; Of the Current Health Expenditure, Union Government share is Rs. 37,221 crores (8.2 percent) and the State Government&rsquo;s share Rs. 59,978 crores (13.3 percent). Local bodies&rsquo; share is Rs. 2,960 crores (0.7 percent), Households share (including insurance contributions) about Rs. 3,20,262 crores (71 percent, OOPE being 67 percent). Contribution by enterprises (including insurance contributions) is Rs. 20,069 crores (4.4 percent) and NGOs is Rs. 7,422 crores (1.6 percent). External/donor funding contributes to about Rs. 3,374 crores (0.7 percent).<br /> <br /> &bull; The Current Health Expenditure attributed to Government Hospitals is Rs. 64,685 crores (14.3 percent) and Private Hospitals Rs. 1, 16,943 (25.9 percent). Expenditures incurred on other Government Providers (including PHC, Dispensaries and Family Planning Centres) is Rs. 27,782 crores (6.2 percent), Other Private Providers (incl. private clinics) is Rs. 23,795 crores (5.3 percent), Providers of Patient Transport and Emergency Rescue is Rs. 20,627 crores (4.6 percent), Medical and Diagnostic laboratories is Rs. 21,058 crores (4.7 percent), Pharmacies is Rs. 1,30,451 crores (28.9 percent), Other Retailers is Rs. 559 crores (0.1 percent), Providers of Preventive care is Rs. 23,817 crores (5.3 percent), and Other Providers is Rs. 9,985 crores (2.2 percent). About Rs. 11,584 crores (2.6 percent) is attributed to Providers of Health System Administration and Financing.<br /> <br /> &bull; Current health expenditure attributed to Inpatient Curative Care is Rs. 1,58,334 crores (35.1 percent), Outpatient curative care is Rs. 73,059 crores (16.2 percent), Patient Transportation is Rs. 20,627 crores (4.6 percent), Laboratory and Imaging services is Rs. 21,058 crores (4.7 percent), Prescribed Medicines is Rs. 1,28,887 crores (28.6 percent), Over The Counter (OTC) Medicines is Rs. 1564 crores (0.3 percent), Therapeutic Appliances and Medical Goods is Rs. 559 crores (0.1 percent), Preventive Care is Rs. 30,420 crores (6.7 percent), and others is Rs. 5,194 crores (1.2 percent). About Rs. 11,584 crores (2.6 percent) is attributed to Governance and Health System Administration.<br /> <br /> &bull; Total Pharmaceutical Expenditure is 37.9 percent of CHE (includes prescribed medicines, over the counter drugs and those provided during an inpatient, outpatient or any other event involving a contact with health care provider). The Expenditure on Traditional, Complementary and Alternative Medicine (TCAM) is 16 percent of CHE.<br /> <br /> &bull; The Current Health Expenditure attributed to Primary Care is 45.1 percent, Secondary Care is 35.6 percent, Tertiary care is 15.6 percent and governance and supervision is 2.6 percent. When this is disaggregated; Government expenditure on Primary Care is 51.3 percent, Secondary Care is 21.9 percent and Tertiary Care is 14 percent. Private expenditure on Primary Care is 43.1 percent, Secondary Care is 39.9 percent and Tertiary Care is 16.1 percent.<br /> &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/National%20Health%20Policy%202017.pdf">click here</a> to access the [inside]National Health Policy 2017[/inside].</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> The National Health Profile provides the latest data on all major health sector-related indicators in a comprehensive manner. It gives information on 6 major sectors i.e. Demographic, Socio-economic, Health Status, Health Finance, Health Infrastructure and Human Resources.&nbsp;<br /> <br /> According to the [inside]National Health Profile 2015[/inside], produced by the Central Bureau of Health Intelligence, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, (please <a href="http://www.cbhidghs.nic.in/E-Book%20HTML-2015/index.html">click here</a> to access):<br /> <br /> <strong><em>Demographic indicators</em></strong><br /> <br /> &bull; Infant Mortality Rate has declined considerably (40 per 1000 live births in 2013), however differentials of rural (44) and urban (27) are still high.<br /> <br /> &bull; Maternal Mortality Ratio (per 1 lakh live births) is highest in Assam (300) and lowest in Kerala (61) in 2011-13.<br /> <br /> &bull; The life expectancy at birth has increased from 49.7 years in 1970-75 to 66.1 years in 2006-10. During 2006-10, the life expectancy for females has been 67.7 years and males has been 64.6 years.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; Among the states, sex ratio is least for Haryana (879) while among the UTs, Daman and Diu (618) lags behind. Kerala (1084) tops the list with maximum sex ratio.<br /> <br /> &bull; The Total Fertility Rate (TFR) for the country has been 2.3 in 2013. In rural areas it has been 2.5, and in urban areas it has been 1.8.<br /> <br /> <strong><em>Socio-economic indicators</em></strong><br /> <br /> &bull; Literacy rate stood at 73 percent in 2011. Literacy rate among females has been 64.6 percent and males has been 80.9 percent. Literacy rate in urban areas (84.1 percent) has been more as compared to the same in rural areas (67.8 percent). Literacy rate has been highest in Kerala (94 percent)<br /> <br /> &bull; The percentage of population below the poverty line (as per Tendulkar methodology) has been 21.9 percent in 2011-12. The percentage of population below the poverty line in rural areas has been 25.7 percent and in urban areas has been 13.7 percent.<br /> <br /> &bull; The per capita Net National Income at current prices increased almost 3 times from Rs. 24,143 in 2004-05 to Rs. 74,920 in 2013-14.<br /> <br /> &bull; The per capita per day net availability of cereals has increased from 386.2 gm in 2001 to 468.9 gm in 2013. Similarly, the per capita per day net availability of pulses has increased from 30 gm in 2001 to 41.9 gm in 2013.<br /> <br /> &bull; Slum population in India is projected to increase from 9.30 crore in 2011 to 10.47 crore in 2017.<br /> <br /> &bull; Of the total 1.34 crore residences in slums, nearly 58.5 percent are in good condition, 37.4 percent are in livable condition and 4.1 percent are in dilapidated condition.&nbsp;<br /> <br /> <strong><em>Health status </em></strong><br /> <br /> &bull; Based on available evidence, cardiovascular disease (24 percent), chronic respiratory disease (11 percent), cancer (6 percent) and diabetes (2 percent) are the leading cause of mortality in India.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of dengue cases in India has grown from 28,292 in 2010 to 40,425 in 2014. The total number of dengue related deaths stood at 131 in 2014.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of Japanese Encephalitis cases in India has grown from 555 in 2010 to 1,652 in 2014. The total number of Japanese Encephalitis related deaths stood at 292 in 2014.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of malaria cases in India has grown from nearly 16 lakh in 2010 to 10.71 lakh in 2014. The total number of malaria related deaths stood at 535 in 2014.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of Chikungunya fever cases in India has reduced from 48,176 in 2010 to 15,445 in 2014.&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; Nearly 47 percent of deliveries in India during 2012-13 were institutional whereas 52.3 percent deliveries took place at home.&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; Nearly 40.5 percent of children under 3 years of age were breastfed within an hour of birth in 2012-13.&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; At the national level, nearly 54 percent of children aged 12-23 months received full vaccination during 2012-13.<br /> <br /> &bull; The incidence of infanticide was 82 and foeticide was 210 in 2012.<br /> <br /> <strong><em>Health finance</em></strong><br /> <br /> &bull; Per capita public expenditure on health in nominal terms has gone up from Rs. 621 in 2009-10 to Rs. 1280 in 2014-15.<br /> <br /> &bull; Public expenditure on health as a percentage of GDP has gone up from 1.12 percent in 2009-10 to 1.26 percent in 2014-15.<br /> <br /> &bull; The Centre-state share in total public expenditure on health has changed from 36:64 in 2009-10 to 30:70 in 2014-15.<br /> <br /> &bull; Out-of-pocket (OOP) medical expenditure incurred during 2011-12 has been Rs. 146 per capita per month for urban India and Rs. 95 for rural India.<br /> <br /> &bull; Over 60 percent of total OOP health expenditure is on medicines, both in rural and urban India in 2011-12.<br /> <br /> &bull; As a share of total consumption expenditure, OOP expenditure on health has been 6.7 percent in rural India and 5.5 percent in urban India in 2011-12.<br /> <br /> &bull; Per capita OOP expenditure as well as the share of OOP in total consumption expenditure was positively correlated with consumption expenditure fractiles; higher fractiles had higher levels of both per capita OOP and share of OOP in consumption expenditure in 2011-12.<br /> <br /> &bull; Among all the states, Kerala had the highest per capita OOP medical expenditure as well as its share in total consumption expenditure in 2011-12.<br /> <br /> &bull; Around 22 crore individuals were covered under any health insurance in 2013-14. This means 18 percent of the population has been covered under any health insurance.<br /> <br /> <strong><em>Human resources in health sector</em></strong><br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of doctors possessing recognized medical qualification (under the IMC Act), registered with state medical councils or Medical Council of India, stood at 15,976 in 2014.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of dental surgeons registered with the Central/ State Dental Councils of India stood at 1.54 lakhs in 2014, which was 21,720 in 1994.<br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of Government allopathic doctors stood at 1.06 lakhs and the total number of Government dental surgeons stood at 5,614.<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 31 December, 2014, the total number of Auxiliary Nurse Midwives (ANMs) stood at 7.86 lakh, whereas Registered Nurses &amp; Registered Midwives (RN &amp; RM) stood at 17.8 lakhs and Lady Health Visitors (LHV) stood at 55,914.<br /> <br /> &bull; As on 27 June, 2014, the total number of pharmacists stood at 6.64 lakh.<br /> <br /> <strong><em>Health infrastructure</em></strong><br /> <br /> &bull; The total number of licensed blood banks in India as on February 2015 is 2760.<br /> <br /> &bull; There are 20,306 hospitals having 6.76 lakh beds in India. There are 16,816 hospitals in rural areas having 1.84 lakh beds and 3,490 hospitals in urban areas having 4.92 lakh beds.<br /> <br /> &bull; The number of medical colleges in India has more than doubled from 146 in 1991-92 to 398 in 2014-15.<br /> &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> The 71st round National Sample Survey on &ldquo;Social Consumption: Health&rdquo; was conducted during January to June 2014. The information in the survey was collected from 36,480 households in rural areas and 29,452 households in urban areas during the 71st round.<br /> <br /> The key findings of the [inside]71st round NSS report: Key Indicators of Social Consumption in India Health (published in June 2015)[/inside] are as follows (please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/nss_71st_ki_health_30june15.pdf" title="NSS 71st Round Health">click here</a> to access the full report; please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/NSS%20Press%20Release%20Health.pdf" title="NSS Press Note Health">click here</a> to read the summary of findings):<br /> <br /> <em>A. Non-hospitalized treatment</em><br /> <br /> &bull; The Proportion (per 1000) of Ailing Persons (PAP), measured as the number of living persons reporting ailments (per 1000 persons), was 89 persons in rural India and 118 persons in urban India.<br /> <br /> &bull; Inclination towards allopathy treatment was prevalent (around 90% in both the sectors). Only 5 to 7 percent usage of &lsquo;other&rsquo; including AYUSH (Ayurveda, Yoga or Naturopathy Unani, Siddha and homoeopathy) was reported both in rural and urban area. Moreover, un-treated spell was higher in rural (both for male and female) than urban areas.<br /> <br /> &bull; Private doctors were the most important single source of treatment in both the sectors (Rural &amp; Urban). More than 70 percent (72 per cent in the rural areas and 79 per cent in the urban areas) spells of ailment were treated in the private sector (consisting of private doctors, nursing homes, private hospitals, charitable institutions, etc.).<br /> <br /> <em>B. Hospitalized treatment</em><br /> <br /> &bull; Medical treatment of an ailing person as an in-patient in any medical institution having provision for treating the sick as in-patients, was considered as hospitalised treatment. In the urban population, 4.4 percent persons were hospitalised at some time during a reference period of 365 days. The proportion of persons hospitalised in the rural areas was lower (3.5 percent).<br /> <br /> &bull; It is observed that in rural India, 42 percent hospitalised treatment was carried out in public hospital and rest 58 percent in private hospital. For the urban India, the corresponding figures were 32 percent and 68 percent. It may be noted in this context that households (or persons within households) were segregated in sector (rural/urban) by their place of domicile, and not by the place of treatment.<br /> <br /> &bull; Preference towards allopathy treatment was observed in cases of hospitalised treatment as well.<br /> <br /> <em>C. Cost of treatment - as in-patient and other</em><br /> <br /> &bull; Average medical expenditure per hospitalisation case: Higher amount was spent for treatment per hospitalised case by people in the private hospitals (Rs. 25850) than in the public hospitals (Rs. 6120). The highest expenditure was recorded for treatment of Cancer (Rs. 56712) followed by that for Cardio-vascular diseases (Rs. 31647).<br /> <br /> &bull; Average medical expenditure per non-hospitalisation case was Rs. 509 in rural India and Rs. 639 in urban India.<br /> <br /> &bull; As much as 86 percent of rural population and 82 percent of urban population were still not covered under any scheme of health expenditure support. Government, however, was able to bring about 12 percent urban and 13 percent rural population under health protection coverage through Rastriya Swasthya Bima Yojana (RSBY) or similar plan. Only 12 percent households of the 5th quintile class (Usual Monthly Per Capita Consumer Expenditure) of urban area had some arrangement of medical insurance from private provider.<br /> <br /> <em>D. Incidence of childbirth, Expenditure on institutional childbirth</em><br /> <br /> &bull; In rural area 9.6% women (age 15-49) were pregnant at any time during the reference period of 365 days; for urban this proportion was 6.8%. Evidence of interrelation of place of childbirth with level of living is noted both in rural and urban areas. In the rural areas, about 20% of the childbirths were at home or any other place other than the hospitals. The same for urban areas was 10.5%. Among the institutional childbirth, 55.5% took place in public hospital and 24% in private hospital in rural area. In urban area, however, the corresponding figures were 42% and 47.5% respectively.<br /> <br /> &bull; An average of Rs. 5544 was spent per childbirth (as inpatient) in rural area and Rs. 11685 in urban area. The rural population spent, on an average, Rs. 1587 for the same in a public sector hospital and Rs. 14778 for one in a private sector hospital. The corresponding figures for urban India were Rs. 2117 and Rs. 20328.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> The key findings of the [inside]Draft National Health Policy 2015 (published in December 2014)[/inside], prepared by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare are as follows (Please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Draft%20National%20Health%20Policy%202015.pdf" title="Draft NHP 2015">click here</a> to download):<br /> <br /> &bull; The draft National Health Policy accepts and endorses the understanding that a full achievement of the goals and principles as defined would require an increased public health expenditure to 4% to 5% of the GDP. However, given that the NHP, 2002 target of 2% was not met, and taking into account the financial capacity of the country to provide this amount and the institutional capacity to utilize the increased funding in an effective manner, the present draft health policy proposes a potentially achievable target of raising public health expenditure to 2.5% of the GDP. It also notes that 40% of this would need to come from Central expenditures. At current prices, a target of 2.5% of GDP translates to Rs. 3800 per capita, representing an almost four fold increase in five years.<br /> <br /> &bull; The private sector today provides nearly 80% of outpatient care and about 60% of inpatient care. (The out-patient estimate would be significantly lower if we included only qualified providers. By NSSO estimates as much as 40% of the private care is likely to be by informal unqualified providers). 72% of all private health care enterprises are own-account-enterprises (OAEs), which are household run businesses providing health services without hiring a worker on a fairly regular basis.<br /> <br /> &bull; In terms of comparative efficiency, public sector is value for money as it accounts (based on the NSSO 60th round) for less than 30% of total expenditure, but provides for about 20% of outpatient care and 40% of in-patient care. This same expenditure also pays for 60% of end-of-life care (RGI estimates on hospital mortality), and almost 100% of preventive and promotive care and a substantial part of medical and nursing education as well.<br /> <br /> &bull; Thailand has almost the same total health expenditure as India but its proportion of public health expenditure is 77.7% of total health expenditures (which is 3.2% of the GDP) and this is spent through a form of strategic purchasing in which about 95% is purchased from public health care facilities- which is what gives it such a high efficiency. Brazil spends 9% of its GDP on health but of this public health expenditure constitutes 4.1% of the GDP (which is 45.7% of total health expenditure). This public health expenditure accounts for almost 75% of all health care provision. It would be ambitious if India could aspire to a public health expenditure of 4% of the GDP, but most expert groups have estimated 2.5% as being more realistic.<br /> <br /> &bull; As costs of care rise, affordability, as distinct from equity, requires emphasis. Health care costs of a household exceeding 10% of its total monthly consumption expenditures or 40% of its non-food consumption expenditure- is designated catastrophic health expenditures- and is declared as an unacceptable level of health care costs.<br /> <br /> &bull; Almost all hospitalization even in public hospitals leads to catastrophic health expenditures, and over 63 million persons are faced with poverty every year due to health care costs alone. It is because there is no financial protection for the vast majority of health care needs. In 2011-12, the share of out-of-pocket expenditure on health care as a proportion of total household monthly per capita expenditure was 6.9% in rural areas and 5.5% in urban areas. This led to an increasing number of households facing catastrophic expenditures due to health costs (18% of all households in 2011-12 as compared to 15% in 2004-05). Under NRHM, free care in public hospitals was extended to a select set of conditions &ndash; for maternity, newborn and infant care as part of the Janani Suraksha Yojana and, the Janani Shishu Suraksha Karyakram, and for disease control programmes. For all other services, user fees especially for diagnostics and &ldquo;outside prescriptions&rdquo; for drugs continued. Also, due to the selective approach, several essential services especially for chronic illness was not obtainable or at best only available at overcrowded district and medical college hospitals resulting in physical and financial hardship and poor quality of care.<br /> <br /> &bull; The Central Government under the Ministry of Labour &amp; Employment, launched the Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana (RSBY) in 2008. The population coverage under these various schemes increased from almost 55 million people in 2003-04 to about 370 million in 2014 (almost one-fourth of the population). Nearly two thirds (180 million) of this population are those in the Below Poverty Line (BPL) category. Evaluations show that schemes such as the RSBY, have improved utilization of hospital services, especially in private sector and among the poorest 20% of households and SC/ST households. However there are other problems. One problem is low awareness among the beneficiaries about the entitlement and how and when to use the RSBY card. Another is related to denial of services by private hospitals for many categories of illnesses, and over supply of some services.<br /> <br /> &bull; The private health care industry is valued at $40 billion and is projected to grow to $ 280 billion by 2020 as per market sources. The current growth rate of this perennially and most rapidly growing area of the economy, the healthcare industry, at 14% is projected to be 21% in the next decade. Even during the global recession of 2008, this sector remained relatively recession-proof. The private health care industry is complex and differentiated. It includes insurance and equipment, which accounts for about 15%, pharmaceuticals which accounts for over 25%, about 10% on diagnostics and about 50% is hospitals and clinical care. The private sector growth cannot be seen merely as a consequence of limited public sector investment. The Government has had an active policy in the last 25 years of building a positive economic climate for the health care industry. Amongst these measures are lower direct taxes; higher depreciation in medical equipment; Income Tax exemptions for 5 years for rural hospitals; custom duty exemptions for imported equipment that are lifesaving; Income Tax exemption for Health Insurance; and active engagement through publicly financed health insurance which now covers almost 27% of the population.<br /> <br /> &bull; Maternal mortality now accounts for 0.55% of all deaths and 4% of all female deaths in the 15 to 49 year age group.<br /> <br /> &bull; India is set to reach the Millennium Development Goals (MDG) with respect to maternal and child survival. The MDG target for Maternal Mortality Ratio (MMR) is 140 per 100,000 live births. From a baseline of 560 in 1990, the nation had achieved 178 by 2010-12, and at this rate of decline is estimated to reach an MMR of 141 by 2015.<br /> <br /> &bull; In the case of under-5 mortality rate (U5MR), the MDG target is 42. From a baseline of 126 in 1990, in 2012 the nation has an U5MR of 52 and an extrapolation of this rate would bring it to 42 by 2015. This is particularly creditable on a global scale where in 1990 India&#39;s MMR and U5MR were 47% and 40% above the international average respectively.<br /> <br /> &bull; Although over 90% of pregnant women receive one antenatal check up and 87% received full TT immunization, only about 68.7% of women have received the mandatory three antenatal check-ups. Again whereas most women had received iron and folic acid tablets, only 31% of pregnant women had consumed more than 100 IFA tablets. For institutional delivery, standard protocols are often not followed during labour and the postpartum period. Sterilization related deaths a preventable tragedy, are often a direct consequence of poor quality of care. Only 61% of children (12-23 months) have been fully immunized.<br /> <br /> &bull; In AIDS control, progress has been good with a decline from a 0.41% prevalence rate in 2001 to 0.27% in 2011 but this still leaves about 21 lakh persons living with HIV, with about 1.16 lakh new cases and 1.48 deaths in 2011. In tuberculosis the challenge is a prevalence of close to 211 cases and 19 deaths per 100,000 population and rising problems of multi-drug resistant tuberculosis. Though these are significant declines from the MDG baseline, India still contributes to 24% of all global new case detection.<br /> <br /> &bull; Over 75% of communicable diseases are not part of existing national programmes. Overall, communicable diseases contribute to 24.4% of the entire disease burden while maternal and neonatal ailments contribute to 13.8%. Non-communicable diseases (39.1%) and injuries (11.8%) now constitute the bulk of the country&#39;s disease burden. National Health Programmes for non-communicable diseases are very limited in coverage and scope, except perhaps in the case of the Blindness control programme.<br /> <br /> &bull; The gap between service availability and needs is widest in the case of mental illness- 43 facilities in the nation with a 0.47 psychologists per million people.<br /> <br /> &bull; The elderly i.e. the population above 60 years comprise 8.6% of the population (103.8 million) and they are also a vulnerable section. Those above 75 years (20.52 million) are most vulnerable and almost 8% of the elderly population is bed ridden or homebound (NSSO).<br /> <br /> **page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The report entitled [inside]Economic Burden of Tobacco Related Diseases in India[/inside] (please&nbsp;<a href="tinymce/uploaded/economic_burden_of_tobacco_related_diseases_in_india_executive_summary.pdf" title="Economic Burden of tobacco related diseases">click here</a>&nbsp;to download the Executive Summary), supported by the Ministry of Health &amp; Family Welfare, Government of India and the WHO Country Office for India, was developed by the Public Health Foundation of India (PHFI).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The report estimates direct and indirect costs from all diseases caused due to tobacco use and four specific diseases namely, respiratory diseases, tuberculosis, cardiovascular diseases and cancers. The report also highlights that tobacco use and the associated costs are creating an enormous burden for the nation.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The total economic costs attributable to tobacco use from all diseases in India in the year 2011 for persons aged 35-69 amounted to Rs. 104500 crores of which 16 percent was direct cost and 84 percent was indirect cost.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to the report, massive direct medical costs of tobacco attributable diseases amount to Rs.16,800 crore and associated indirect morbidity cost of Rs. 14,700 crore. The cost from premature mortality is Rs. 73,000 crores, indicating a substantial productive loss to the nation, the report states.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to the United Nations&#39; report (released in May, 2014) entitled [inside]Trends in maternal mortality estimates 1990 to 2013[/inside], (please&nbsp;<a href="tinymce/uploaded/Trends%20in%20Maternal%20Mortality%201990%20to%202013.pdf" title="Trends in Maternal Mortality 1990 to 2013">click here</a>&nbsp;to download):&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em><strong>Indian scenario</strong></em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Maternal mortality ratio (MMR)* in India stood at 560 maternal deaths (per 100000 live births) during 1990, 460 during 1995, 370 during 2000, 280 during 2005 and 190 during 2013.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; As compared to India (MMR: 190 per 100000 live births), Brazil (MMR: 69) and China (MMR: 32) performed better in reducing maternal deaths.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; An Indian woman&rsquo;s lifetime risk of maternal death** &ndash; the probability that a 15 year old woman will eventually die from a maternal cause &ndash; is 1 in 190, whereas for a Chinese woman it is 1 in 1800 and for a Brazilian woman it is 1 in 780.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; At the country level, the two countries that accounted for one third of all global maternal deaths are India at 17 percent (50000) and Nigeria at 14 percent (40000).&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The proportion of deaths among women of reproductive age that are due to maternal causes (PM)*** in India is 6.7 percent whereas for China it is 1.6 percent and for Brazil it is 2.8 percent.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The ten countries that comprised 58 percent of the global maternal deaths reported in 2013 are: India (50000, 17%); Nigeria (40000, 14%); Democratic Republic of the Congo (21000, 7%); Ethiopia (13000, 4%); Indonesia (8800, 3%); Pakistan (7900, 3%); United Republic of Tanzania (7900, 3%); Kenya (6300, 2%); China (5900, 2%); Uganda (5900, 2%).&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; India could reduce MMR by 65 percent between 1990 and 2013.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The present report has classified India among 96 countries with incomplete civil registration and/or other types of maternal mortality data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em><strong>Global scenario</strong></em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Every day, approximately 800 women die from preventable causes related to pregnancy and childbirth.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Under MDG5, countries committed to reducing maternal mortality by three quarters between 1990 and 2015. Since 1990, maternal deaths worldwide have dropped by 45%. However, between 1990 and 2013, the global maternal mortality ratio (i.e. the number of maternal deaths per 100 000 live births) declined by only 2.6% per year. This is far from the annual decline of 5.5% required to achieve MDG5.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; 99 percent of all maternal deaths occur in developing countries. More than half of these deaths occur in sub-Saharan Africa and almost one third occur in South Asia.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The maternal mortality ratio in developing countries in 2013 is 230 per 100 000 live births versus 16 per 100 000 live births in developed countries.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; A woman&rsquo;s lifetime risk of maternal death &ndash; the probability that a 15 year old woman will eventually die from a maternal cause &ndash; is 1 in 3700 in developed countries, versus 1 in 160 in developing countries.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Maternal mortality is higher in women living in rural areas and among poorer communities.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Young adolescents face a higher risk of complications and death as a result of pregnancy than older women.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The major complications that account for 80% of all maternal deaths are: a. severe bleeding (mostly bleeding after childbirth); b. infections (usually after childbirth); c. high blood pressure during pregnancy (pre-eclampsia and eclampsia); and d. unsafe abortion. The remainder are caused by or associated with diseases such as malaria, and AIDS during pregnancy. Skilled care before, during and after childbirth can save the lives of women and newborn babies.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; While levels of antenatal care have increased in many parts of the world during the past decade, only 46 percent of women in low-income countries benefit from skilled care during childbirth.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Other factors that prevent women from receiving or seeking care during pregnancy and childbirth are: poverty, distance, lack of information, inadequate services and cultural practices.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Note:&nbsp;</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">* Maternal mortality ratio (MMR) is the number of maternal deaths during a given time period per 100000 live births during the same time period.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">** Adult lifetime risk of maternal death is the probability that a 15-year-old women will die eventually from a maternal cause.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">*** Proportion of deaths among women of reproductive age that are due to maternal causes (PM) is the number of maternal deaths in a given time period divided by the total deaths among women aged 15&ndash;49 years.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Rural%20Health%20Statistics%20of%20India%202012.pdf" title="Rural Health Statistics of India 2012">click here</a> to access the latest edition of [inside]Rural Health Statistics in India 2012[/inside] that was released by the Union health ministry. The report provides detailed statistics on rural health infrastructure on the basis of information available up to March, 2012 and data provided by the States and Union Territories.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> According to the UNICEF report titled [inside]Committing to Child Survival: A Promise Renewed Progress Report 2013[/inside] (please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/APR_Progress_Report_2013_9_Sept_2013_1.pdf" title="UNICEF child mortality report">click here</a> to download):<br /> <br /> <strong><em>Indian scenario</em></strong><br /> <br /> &bull; Under Five Mortality Rate (Probability of dying between birth and exactly 5 years of age, expressed per 1,000 live births) in India for the year 2012, stands at 56 and India&#39;s ranking in terms of U5MR is 49. In 2012, the neonatal mortality rate (Probability of dying in the first month of life, expressed per 1,000 live births) at national level is at 31. The share of neonatal deaths in under-five deaths stood at 55 percent in 2012 as compared to 41 percent in 1990.&nbsp;&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; U5MR in India declined by 55 percent from 126 in 1990 to 56 in 2012. Infant Mortality Rate (Probability of dying between birth and exactly 1 year of age, expressed per 1,000 live births) declined from 88 in 1990 to 44 in 2012. Neonatal mortality rate declined from 51 in 1990 to 31 in 2012.&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; U5MR in India among boys declined from 121 in 1990 to 54 in 2012. U5MR in India among girls declined from 130 in 1990 to 59 in 2012.<br /> <br /> &bull; In 2012, 21 percent deaths among Indian children under 5 years of age occurred due to pneumonia, 10 percent due to diarrhoea, 1 percent due to malaria, 3 percent due to measles and 43 percent due to neonatal causes.<br /> <br /> &bull; Half of all under-five deaths occur in just five countries: India (22%), Nigeria (13%), Pakistan, the Democratic Republic of the Congo (each 6%) and China (4%).<br /> <br /> &bull; Around two-thirds of neonatal deaths occur in just 10 countries, with India accounting for more than one-quarter and Nigeria for a tenth. More than 4 in 10 of all neonatal deaths worldwide occur in just three countries: India, Nigeria, and Pakistan.<br /> <br /> &bull; More than half of the under-five deaths caused by pneumonia or diarrhoea occur in just four countries: India, Nigeria, Pakistan and the Democratic Republic of the Congo.<br /> <br /> &bull; The Governments of Ethiopia, India and the United States, together with the UN agency, launched in 2012 &lsquo;Committing to Child Survival: A Promise Renewed&#39;, a global effort to accelerate efforts to stop young children from dying from preventable causes. Some 176 governments have signed on, including those making some of the greatest strides in under-five mortality.<br /> <br /> &bull; In February 2013, the Government of India, another cosponsor of the global Call to Action, convened a national forum of state policymakers, technical advisors, civil society organizations and private-sector partners to identify and commit to high-impact strategies that can accelerate the decline in preventable child deaths.<br /> <br /> <strong><em>Global scenario</em></strong><br /> <br /> &bull; In 2012, around 6.6 million children died globally before their fifth birthday, at a rate of around 18,000 per day. Since 1990, 216 million children have died before their fifth birthday &mdash; more than the current total population of Brazil, the world&rsquo;s fifth most populous country.<br /> <br /> &bull; Of the 6.6 million under-five deaths globally in 2012, most were from preventable causes such as pneumonia, diarrhoea or malaria; around 44% of deaths in children under 5 occurred during the neonatal period. Pneumonia and diarrhoea remain leading causes of deaths among children under 5, killing almost 5,000 children under 5 every day. Malaria remains an important cause of child death, killing 1,200 children under 5 every day.<br /> <br /> &bull; Global progress in reducing child deaths since 1990 has been very significant. The global rate of under-five mortality has roughly halved, from 90 deaths per 1,000 live births in 1990 to 48 per 1,000 in 2012. The estimated annual number of under-five deaths has fallen from 12.6 million to 6.6 million over the same period.<br /> <br /> &bull; Put another way, 17,000 fewer children die each day in 2012 than did in 1990 &mdash; thanks to more effective and affordable treatments, innovative ways of delivering critical interventions to the poor and excluded, and sustained political commitment. These and other vital child survival interventions have helped to save an estimated 90 million lives in the past 22 years.<br /> <br /> &bull; The global annual rate of reduction in under-five deaths has steadily accelerated since 1990-1995, when it stood at 1.2%, more than tripling to 3.9% in 2005-2012. Both sub-Saharan African regions&mdash;particularly Eastern and Southern Africa but also West and Central Africa&mdash;have seen a consistent acceleration in reducing under-five deaths, particularly since 2000.<br /> <br /> &bull; At the current rate of reduction in under-five mortality, the world will only make MDG 4 by 2028 &mdash; 13 years after the deadline &mdash; and 35 million more children will die between 2015 and 2028 whose lives could be saved if we were able to make the goal on time in 2015 and continue that trend.<br /> <br /> &bull; Accelerating progress in child survival urgently requires greater attention to ending preventable child deaths in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia, which together account for 4 out of 5 under-five deaths globally.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to the [inside]Pneumonia Progress Report, 2012[/inside], released by IVAC and John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012.pdf" title="Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012">click here</a> to access:</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The 2000-2010 decade brought a significant reduction in overall child mortality, from 9.6 to 7.6 million. Pneumonia continues to be the number one killer of children around the world-causing 18% of all child mortality, an estimated 1.3 million child deaths in 2011 alone.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Nearly 99 percent of all pneumonia deaths occur in developing countries, and three-quarters take place in just 15 countries. The majority of pneumonia cases are preventable or treatable.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Pneumonia is the leading cause of child mortality in India, responsible for the deaths of nearly 400,000 &nbsp;children under five in 2010.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Percentage of Indian children with suspected pneumonia receiving antibiotics stood at 13 percent in 2010.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Percentage of under-five Indian children with suspected pneumonia taken to appropriate health-care provider stood at 69 percent in 2010.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Percentage of children receiving exclusive breastfeeding in first 6 months of life is 46 percent (as per latest available data during 2006-2010).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Vaccine coverage in the case of DTP3 (third dose of diphtheria and tetanus toxoid and pertussis vaccine) is 72 percent and in the case of measles is 74 percent in 2011.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; India and Nigeria, two large countries with the highest numbers of child deaths worldwide, remain low scorers with an average intervention coverage (interventions in terms of vaccination, breastfeeding, access to care and antibiotic treatment) rate of 55% and 40%, respectively.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; One notable area of progress in India is on coverage of two vaccines that can help prevent pneumonia, Hib vaccine and measles vaccine. While Hib vaccine uptake has been slow in India&rsquo;s public sector, momentum is now shifting following efforts by the Ministry of Health &amp; Family Welfare (MOHFW), states, health experts and advocates to prioritize implementation of the National Technical Advisory Group on Immunization&rsquo;s (NTAGI) recommendation to add Hib to the Universal Immunization Programme (UIP).&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Two Indian states, Tamil Nadu and Kerala, introduced Hib vaccines (in the form of the pentavalent vaccine) in December 2011, and six more are slated to do so by the end of 2012. At a recent Hib Symposium in the state of Odisha, MOHFW officials stated that at least twice as many additional states have expressed interest in the vaccine.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; India has joined other WHO Member States in introducing a second dose of measles vaccine into the UIP to ensure its children are protected from the virus, which contributes to the burden of pneumonia. Measles was once one of the leading causes of death in children, but global measles deaths have declined dramatically because of widespread coverage with two doses of measles vaccine. India began a phased introduction of the second dose in 2010; by the end of the first year, the second dose of measles vaccine had been added to routine immunization in 21 states and catch-up campaigns were completed in 197 districts in 14 states.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to the report titled: [inside]Defeating malaria in Asia, the Pacific, Americas, Middle East and Europe, November, 2012[/inside], which has been produced by World Health Organization and PATH,&nbsp;<a href="http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Defeating%20malaria.pdf">http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Defeating%20malaria.pdf</a>: &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The Indian Commission on Macroeconomics and Health notes that, in India, 13 household person-days per patient were lost per episode of malaria. Furthermore, the commission estimated that the overall monetary losses to families (income losses together with treatment expenses) could amount to between 200 and 400 Indian rupees (US$ 3.5 to 7).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; With an estimated 22.5 million malaria cases in India, this translates to an annual cost of US$ 79 to 157 million, or 0.01% of gross domestic product each year.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In states with the highest incidence rates, such as Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Meghalaya, Mizoram, and Orissa, the annual cost of illness represents more than 0.1% of a gross state income.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Tribal populations living in forests in Orissa, India, have incidence rates that are almost 10 times higher than in the plains.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Odisha is one of the most highly malaria-endemic states in India, accounting for 24% of reported cases in 2010 despite consisting of less of than 4% of the national population. Malaria is particularly common among tribal groups which represent 44% of the population of Orissa.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; A study in Sundargarh District of Odisha showed that forest areas had an annual incidence of 280 cases per 1000 population compared to 30 cases per 1000 on the plains. Approximately 84% of infections in forest areas were due to P. falciparum compared to 69% in plain areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Malaria&rsquo;s main victims tend to be poorer populations living in rural communities, with limited or no access to long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; WHO estimates that 216 million cases of malaria occurred globally in 2010; 34 million (16%) of these occurred outside of Africa of which 18.1 million (53%) were due to P. falciparum.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; WHO estimates that 655 000 deaths occurred globally, of which 46 000 (7%) occurred outside of Africa. WHO estimates that 2.5 billion people were at risk of malaria outside of Africa.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; There are 98 countries with ongoing transmission of malaria. Of these, 47 lie on the African continent, 21 are in the Americas, and 30 in Europe, Asia, and the Pacific. Of the 98 countries, 81 are in the control phase, 8 in the pre-elimination phase, and 9 in the elimination phase.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; While the disease burden has been declining in countries with fewer malaria cases and deaths, progress has been slower in countries where the bulk of the disease burden lies: India, Indonesia, Myanmar, Pakistan, and Papua New Guinea. These five high-burden countries account for 89% of all malaria cases in the region.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Malaria transmission occurs in 17 countries of Asia. Approximately 2 billion people in the region live at some risk of malaria, of which 525 million live at high risk (reported incidence more than 1 case per 1000 population per year).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Most reported cases of malaria in Asia are due to P. falciparum although the proportion varies considerably by country; it exceeds 80% in the Lao People&rsquo;s Democratic Republic, Myanmar, Timor-Leste, and Viet Nam, while transmission is exclusively due to P. vivax in the Democratic People&rsquo;s Republic of Korea and the Republic of Korea.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Insecticide resistance has now been reported in 24 out of 51 countries with malaria transmission outside of Africa.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to [inside]Children in India 2012-A Statistical Appraisal[/inside], Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, GoI, please <a href="https://im4change.org/docs/659Children_in_India_2012.pdf">click here</a> to access:</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em><strong>Neonatal Mortality Rate</strong></em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In 2010, the neonatal mortality rate (Probability of dying in the first month of life, expressed per 1,000 live births) at national level is at 33 and ranges from 19 in urban areas to 36 in rural areas. Among bigger states, neo-natal mortality rate is highest in Madhya Pradesh (44) and lowest in Kerala (7).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The rural&ndash;urban gap in neo natal mortality rate was highest in Andhra Pradesh and Assam (23 points), followed by Rajasthan (22 points). The rural &ndash;urban gap in neo natal mortality rate lowest in Kerala (3 points), followed by Tamil Nadu (6 points).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Factors which affect fetal and neonatal deaths are primarily endogenous, while those which affect post neonatal deaths are primarily exogenous. The endogenous factors are related to the formation of the foetus in the womb and are therefore, mainly biological in nature. Among the biological factors affecting fetal and neonatal infant mortality rates the important ones are the age of the mother, birth order, period of spacing between births, prematurity, weight at birth, mothers health.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em><strong>Infant Mortality Rate&nbsp;</strong></em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Infant Mortality Rate (Probability of dying between birth and exactly 1 year of age, expressed per 1,000 live births) has declined for males from 78 in 1990 to 46 in 2010 and for females the decline was from 81 to 49 during this period.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Infant Mortality Rate for the country as a whole declined from 66 in 2001 to 47 in 2010. With the present improved trend due to sharp fall during 2008-09, the national level estimate of infant mortality rate is likely to be 44 against the MDG target of 27 in 2015.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Infant Mortality Rate has declined in urban areas from 50 in 1990 to 31 in 2010, whereas in rural areas Infant Mortality Rate has declined from 86 to 51 during the same period.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Infant Mortality Rate in 2010, was lowest in Goa (10) followed by Kerala (13) and Manipur (14). The States of Madhya Pradesh (62), Orissa (61), Uttar Pradesh (61), Assam (58), Meghalaya (55), Rajasthan (55), Chhattisgarh (51), Bihar (48) and Haryana (48) reported infant mortality rate above the national average (47).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Among infants, the main causes of death are: Certain Conditions Originating in the Perinatal Period (67.2%), Certain infectious and Parasitic diseases (8.3%), Diseases of the Respiratory System (7.7%), Congenial Malformations, Deformations &amp; chromosomal Abnormalities (3.3%), Other causes (10.6%).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em><strong>Under Five Mortality Rate&nbsp;</strong></em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Under Five Mortality Rate (Probability of dying between birth and exactly 5 years of age, expressed per 1,000 live births) in India for the year 2010, stands at 59 and it varies from 66 in rural areas to 38 in Urban areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Under Five Mortality Rate stood at 64 for females whereas it is 55 for males in 2010.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Under Five Mortality Rate varies from lowest in Kerala (15), followed by 27 in Tamil Nadu to alarmingly high level in Assam (83), followed by Madhya Pradesh (82), Uttar Pradesh (79) and Odisha (78).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Given to reduce Under Five Mortality Rate to 42 per thousand live births by 2015, India tends to reach near to 52 by that year missing the target by 10 percentage points.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Among children aged 0 to 4 years, the main causes of death are: Certain infectious and Parasitic Diseases (23.1%), Diseases of the Respiratory System (16.1%), Diseases of the Nervous System (12.1%), Diseases of the Circulatory System (7.9%), Injury, Poisoning etc (0.9%), Other major causes (33.9 %).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em><strong>Immunization</strong></em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; At national level, 61% of the children aged 12-23 months have received full immunization in 2009. The coverage of immunization was higher in urban areas (67.4%) as compared to that in the rural areas (58.5%).&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Nearly 8% Indian children did not receive even a single vaccine in 2009. Nearly 62% of the male children aged 12-23 months have received full immunization, while among the females it was nearly 60%.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; 76.6 percent of children aged 12-23 months received full immunization coverage whose mothers had 12 or more years of education whereas 45.3 percent of children whose mothers had no education got full immunization.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; About 75.5% of children of less than one year belonging to the highest wealth index group are fully immunized while only 47.3% from the lowest quintile are fully immunized.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The full immunization coverage of children age 12-23 months is highest in Goa (87.9%), followed by Sikkim (85.3%), Punjab (83.6%), and Kerala (81.5%). The full immunization coverage is lowest in Arunachal Pradesh (24.8%).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to [inside]WHO Global Report: Mortality Attributable to Tobacco (2012)[/inside], please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Mortality%20due%20to%20tobacco.pdf" title="Mortality due to tobacco">click here</a> to access:&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Globally 12% of all deaths among adults aged 30 years and over were attributed to tobacco as compared with 16% in India, 17% in Pakistan and 31% in Bangladesh.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In India, the death rate from non-communicable diseases (NCDs) [1096 per 100,000 population] was about 3.3 times that for communicable diseases [336 per 100,000]. Tobacco was responsible for 9% of all NCDs as compared with 2% of all communicable disease related deaths.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The death rate due to tobacco in Indian men was 206 [per 100,000 men aged 30 years and over] as compared with 13 [per 100,000 women aged 30 years and over] for women. The proportion of deaths attributable to tobacco was almost 12% for men and 1% for women in India. &nbsp; &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Within the NCDs, ischaemic heart disease accounted for 329 deaths per 100,000 population aged 30 years and over, with 5% of these deaths attributed to tobacco in India. Cancer of the trachea, bronchus and lung accounted for 16 deaths per 100,000 population but with 58% of these deaths attributed to tobacco.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Within the communicable disease group, deaths attributed to tobacco accounted for 5% of all lower respiratory infection deaths and 4% of all tuberculosis deaths in India. &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; The regions with the highest proportion of deaths atrributable to tobacco are the Americas and the European regions where tobacco has been used for a longer period of time.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; 71% of all lung cancer deaths globally are attributable to tobacco use. 42% of all chronic deaths globally are attributable to tobacco use.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; Direct tobacco smoking is currently responsible for the death of about 5 million people worldwide each year with many deaths occuring prematurely. An additional 600,000 people are estimated to die from the effects of second-hand smoke.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; In next 2 decades, the annual death from tobacco globally is expected to rise to over 8 million, with more than 80% of those deaths projected to occur in low-and middle-income countries.&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull; If effective measures are not urgently taken, tpbacco could in the 21st century kill over 1 billion people worldwide. Tobacco kills more than tuberculosis, HIV/ AIDS and malaria combined.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to the report titled [inside]The Growing Danger of Non-Communicable Diseases: Acting Now to Reverse Course (2011)[/inside], September, The World Bank, please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/The%20Growing%20Danger%20of%20Non-Communicable%20Diseases.pdf" title="The Growing Danger of Non-Communicable Diseases">click here</a> to access:</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> &bull; Heart disease, cancer, diabetes, chronic respiratory conditions, and other non-communicable diseases (NCDs) increasingly threaten the physical health and economic security of many lower-and middle-income countries.<br /> <br /> &bull; The change in mortality and disease levels will be particularly substantial in Sub-Saharan Africa, where NCDs will account for 46 percent of all deaths by 2030, up from 28 percent in 2008, and in South Asia, which will see the share of deaths from NCDs increase from 51 to 72 percent during the same period. More than 30 percent of these deaths will be premature and preventable. These lower-income countries will, at the same time, continue to grapple with the widespread prevalence of communicable diseases such as HIV, malaria, tuberculosis, and mother and child conditions, and so face a &ldquo;double burden&rdquo; of disease not experienced by their wealthier counterparts.<br /> <br /> &bull; The potential cost of NCDs to economies, health systems, households and individuals in middle- and lower-income countries is high. In many middle- and lower-income countries, NCDs are affecting populations at younger ages, resulting in longer periods of ill-health, premature deaths and greater loss of productivity that is so vital for development.<br /> <br /> &bull; Much of the rise in NCDs in developing countries is attributable to modifiable risk factors such as physical inactivity, malnutrition in the first thousand days of life and later an unhealthy diet (including excessive salt, fat, and sugar intake), tobacco use, alcohol abuse, and exposure to environmental pollution.<br /> <br /> &bull; Country evidence suggests that more than half of the NCD burden could be avoided through effective health promotion and disease prevention programs that tackle such risk factors. Particularly effective at very low costs are measures to curb tobacco, such as taxes, as indicated in the &ldquo;WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control&rdquo;, and to reduce salt in processed and semi processed foods.<br /> <br /> &bull; By 2030, cancer incidence is projected to increase by 70 percent in middle-income countries and 82 percent in lower-income countries.<br /> <br /> &bull; While increases in NCD-related mortality and ill-health in part reflect countries&rsquo; successes in extending lives and curbing communicable diseases, a significant part of the increase is a result of modifiable risk factors, many of which are linked to modernization, urbanization, and lifestyle changes.<br /> <br /> &bull; The rise of NCDs amongst younger populations may jeopardize many countries&rsquo; &ldquo;demographic dividend&rdquo;, including the economic benefits expected to be generated during the period when a relatively larger part of the population is of working age. Instead, these countries will have to contend with the costs associated with populations that are living with longer episodes of illhealth.<br /> <br /> &bull; Cardiovascular disease is already a major cause of death and disability in South Asia, where the average age of first-time heart attack sufferers is 53 compared to 59 in the rest of the world.<br /> <br /> &bull; A recent study illustrated the economic impact of NCDs in India by estimating that if NCDs were &ldquo;eliminated&rdquo;, the country&rsquo;s 2004 GDP would have been 4 to 10 percent greater.<br /> <br /> &bull; The share of out-of-pocket household health expenditures on NCDs in India increased from 32 percent to 47 percent between 1995&ndash;1996 and 2004. Moreover, 40 percent of these expenditures were financed by borrowing and sales of assets, increasing the household&rsquo;s financial vulnerability. NCDs also increase the risk of households incurring &ldquo;catastrophic&rdquo; health costs. In South Asia, the chance of incurring catastrophic hospitalization expenditures was 160 percent higher for cancer patients and 30 percent higher for those with cardiovascular diseases than it was for those with a communicable disease requiring hospitalization .<br /> <br /> &bull; Because of their specific characteristics, NCDs affect adults&mdash;often in their productive years, require costly long term treatment and care, and often are accompanied by some degree of disability. Therefore, they could potentially have greater socio-economic impact than other health conditions. Increased NCD levels can: reduce labor supply and outputs, increase costs to employers (from absenteeism and higher health care coverage costs), lower returns on human capital investments, reduced domestic consumption and lower tax revenues, as well as increased public health and social welfare expenditures.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to the report titled: [inside]AIDS at 30: Nations at the crossroads (2011)[/inside], which has been brought out by UNAIDS, please <a href="http://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/media_asset/aids-at-30_1.pdf">click here</a> to access:&nbsp;&nbsp;<br /> <br /> &bull; The number of people living with HIV was around 34 million worldwide in 2010.<br /> <br /> &bull; There were 2.6 million new HIV infections worldwide in 2009.<br /> <br /> &bull; Between 1981 and 2000, the number of people living with HIV rose from less than one million to an estimated 27.5 million [26&ndash;29 million].<br /> <br /> &bull; Low- and middle-income countries accounted for 95% or more of the global HIV burden by 1998.<br /> <br /> &bull; While less than 1% of adults in South Africa were living with HIV in 1990, 16.1% were living with HIV a decade later. During the same period, adult HIV prevalence rose from less than 1% to 24.5% in Lesotho, and from 3.5% to 26% in Botswana.<br /> <br /> &bull; Half of HIV infections in Eastern Europe and Central Asia in 2010 were due to drug users sharing needles.<br /> <br /> &bull; Clinical trials show that male circumcision reduces the chance of men becoming HIV-positive by about 60%.<br /> <br /> &bull; Beginning in 2005, a series of randomized controlled trials in sub-Saharan Africa found that circumsising adult men reduced their risk of infection by about 60%.<br /> <br /> &bull; Scientific knowledge about HIV expanded steadily in the years 1981&ndash;2000. The virus was identified in 1983, and the first serologic test became available in 1985. In the 1990s, studies demonstrated in developed and low- and middle-income countries the possibility of significantly lowering the risk of vertical transmission.<br /> <br /> &bull; Today, 94% of countries (162 of 172 countries reporting) have national HIV strategic plans, up from 87% in 2006. The coordination of national responses also improved during the epidemic&rsquo;s third decade. Two out of three (67%) countries in 2010 reported having a single HIV monitoring and evaluation system, up from 46% in 2006, although country reports cite insufficient coordination of diverse partners as a continuing challenge to national responses.<br /> <br /> &bull; According to the latest UNGASS reports, AIDS expenditures in 2009 totalled US$ 1.07 billion. Estimates based on the methodology suggested by the Commission on AIDS in Asia indicate that US$ 3.3 billion is needed for a targeted response across the region.<br /> <br /> &bull; There was a significant increase in investment in the HIV response in low- and middle-income countries between 2001 and 2009, with total expenditure rising nearly 10-fold, from US$ 1.6 billion to US$ 15.9 billion.<br /> <br /> &bull; Public and private domestic resources accounted for 52% of total spending on HIV programmes in low- and middle-income countries in 2009, but many low-income countries remain heavily dependent on external financing. In 56 countries, international donors supply at least 70% of HIV resources. This pattern potentially encourages the emergence of new global inequities, as millions of people in sub-Saharan Africa now rely on external donors on a daily basis for the drugs and services that keep them alive.<br /> <br /> &bull; The UNAIDS Domestic Investment Priority Index, a formula that accounts for total HIV burden and government resources, shows that eight of 14 countries in West and Central Africa, six of 16 countries in Eastern and Southern Africa, and all but four countries in Asia were allocating inadequate resources to HIV in&nbsp; 2009.<br /> <br /> &bull; According to research from nine countries under the People Living with HIV Stigma Index, 53% of Rwandans living with HIV have been verbally insulted, 33% of rural Zambians living with HIV have experienced physical violence, and 65% of Rwandans living with HIV have lost a job or income opportunity. Furthermore, women living with HIV from various countries report abuses of their sexual and reproductive health and rights. Nearly 20% of women in Namibia who participated in discussions and interviews with the International Community of Women Living with HIV (ICW), reported that they had been coerced or forced into sterilization. Such deep-seated social ostracism and discriminatory actions discourage people from being tested for HIV or seeking other needed services.<br /> <br /> &bull; Among young women in South Africa, experience of intimate partner violence increases the odds of becoming infected with HIV by 11.9%, while gender inequality within a relationship increases the risk by 13.9%, according to a study reported in The Lancet in 2010.<br /> <br /> &bull; According to the UNAIDS Global Report 2010, the proportion of countries reporting programmes to address stigma and discrimination increased from 39% in 2006 to 92% in 2010, although a budget for these programmes was in place in less than half of these countries.<br /> <br /> &bull; More than 56 countries have laws that specifically criminalize HIV transmission or exposure, with the majority of prosecutions reported in high-income countries. As of April 2011, 47 countries, territories and areas imposed some form of restriction on the entry, stay and residence of people living with HIV. However, in a more positive development, China, Namibia and USA lifted their HIV-related travel restrictions in 2010, while Ecuador and India clarified that no such restrictions were in place.<br /> <br /> &bull; In 116 countries, territories and areas, some aspect of sex work is criminalized. Seventy-nine countries and territories worldwide criminalize consensual same-sex sexual relations, including 85% of countries in Eastern and Southern Africa, 81% in the Middle East and North Africa, and 69% in the Caribbean.<br /> <br /> &bull; Thirty-two countries have laws that allow for the death penalty for drug-related offences, and 27 provide for the compulsory detention of people who use drugs, often without due process or minimum standards of detention or treatment. Such laws, as well as abusive law enforcement and poor access to legal services, deter individuals from seeking needed services, increase their vulnerability to becoming HIV-positive, and intensify their social isolation.<br /> <br /> &bull; As of December 2010, an estimated 6.6 million people in low- and middle-income countries were receiving antiretroviral therapy, an increase of 1.4 million from a year earlier. Between 2001 and 2010, the number of people receiving antiretroviral treatment rose nearly 22-fold, a vivid illustration of the power of international solidarity, innovative approaches and people-centred responses.<br /> <br /> &bull; In sub-Saharan Africa the number of people receiving antiretroviral treatment in 2010 increased by 31%; in the Middle East and North Africa, that figure was 21%.<br /> <br /> &bull; As of December 2009, seven countries had already reached at least 80% of treatment-eligible individuals with antiretroviral treatment. Eighteen countries reported treatment coverage of at least 60%.<br /> <br /> &bull; Since its emergence in 1996, highly active anti retroviral therapy has saved an estimated 14.4 million life years worldwide as of December 2009. Although 54% of life-years saved between 1995 and 2009 were in Western Europe and North America, where antiretroviral therapy has long been available, 3.7 million life-years have been saved in sub-Saharan Africa. The pace of reducing morbidity and mortality in sub-Saharan Africa has accelerated since 2005 as a result of dramatic programme scale-up.<br /> <br /> &bull; In 2009, nearly one in five people (18%) who started antiretroviral therapy in low- and middle-income countries were no longer in care 12 months later.<br /> <br /> &bull; At present, more than 95% of patients on treatment are on first-generation antiretroviral medicines, the majority of which are off-patent. As drug resistance increases over time, more patients will require second- and third-generation medicines. Most of these more recent medicines will remain under patent protection for years to come, resulting in potentially drastic increases in treatment costs. This can be alleviated to a large extent by making use of the flexibilities of public health related TRIPS (trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights). In March 2011, UNAIDS, WHO and UNDP issued a policy brief calling on all countries to use TRIPS flexibilities to lower costs and improve access to HIV treatment. By 2005, five years after affordable means of preventing vertical transmission became available, only 15% of HIV-positive pregnant women in low- and middle-income countries received antiretroviral prophylaxis.<br /> <br /> &bull; More than 50% of pregnant women who tested positive for HIV in 2010 were assessed for their eligibility to receive antiretroviral therapy for their own health. These gains in reducing vertical transmission have helped to reduce childhood mortality. The number of children newly infected with HIV in 2009 (370 000 [230 000&ndash;510 000]) was 26% lower than in 2001.<br /> <br /> &bull; According to the most recent population-based surveys in low- and middle-income countries with available data, only 24% of young women and 36% of young men responded correctly when asked five questions about HIV prevention methods and popular misconceptions about HIV transmission. Young women tend to be less likely than young men to be aware of the prevention benefits of consistent condom use. When prompted, 74% of young males in DHS surveys knew that using a condom helps to prevent HIV infection, while only 49% of young females knew the right answer. Some 78% of young males also knew that having a single, faithful partner lowers the risk of HIV infection, compared to only 59% of young females.<br /> <br /> &bull; In 14 countries where HIV prevalence exceeds 2% and where nationally representative data are available, more than 70% of men and women who had high-risk sex in the past year report not using a condom the last time they had sex.<br /> <br /> &bull; Globally, HIV prevalence levels above those reported in the general population have been documented among men who have sex with men (MSM), transgender people, people who inject drugs (IDUs), and sex workers.<br /> <br /> &bull; According to the most recently available data, the proportion of countries reporting that they conduct systematic surveillance of HIV among key populations increased between 2008 and 2010: for sex workers, from 44% to 50%; for MSM, from 30% to 36%; while among IDUs it remained stable at 28%.<br /> <br /> &bull; An estimated 20% of the 15.9 million IDUs worldwide are living with HIV. This statistic underscores the world&rsquo;s failure to put the lessons of harm reduction to use. In at least 69 countries where injecting drug use has been documented, no programme to provide even sterile needles and syringes exists.<br /> <br /> &bull; The epidemic among MSM communities is a worldwide phenomenon, with 63 out of 67 countries reporting in 2009 a higher HIV prevalence among MSM compared with the general population.<br /> <br /> &bull; At least 79 countries, territories and areas have laws against male&ndash;male sexual contact, including some that authorize the death penalty.<br /> <br /> &bull; Among 56 countries reporting in both 2008 and 2010, median condom use with the most recent client reached 84%, with a range from about two thirds to nearly 100%.<br /> <br /> &bull; According to recent estimates, HIV is a leading cause of pregnancyrelated deaths, accounting for about 11% of all maternal deaths in 2008.<br /> <br /> &bull; HIV-positive newborns have about a 50% risk of death before age two in the absence of treatment.<br /> <br /> &bull; In 2009, HIV accounted for 2.1% (1.2&ndash;3.0%) of under-five deaths in low- and middle-income countries, a decline from 2.6% (1.6&ndash;3.5%) in 2000.<br /> <br /> &bull; In sub-Saharan Africa, HIV was responsible for 3.6% (2.0&ndash;5.0%) of all deaths in children under five in 2009. Here, too, striking achievements are evident, as the HIV share of all under-five deaths has sharply fallen from the 5.4% (3.3%&ndash;7.3%) reported in 2000.<br /> <br /> &bull; Universal access to effective prevention, diagnosis and treatment for HIV-related tuberculosis (TB) could prevent up to one million TB deaths in people living with HIV between now and 2015, but the world is falling far short of this target.<br /> <br /> &bull; Only 28% of TB patients globally knew their HIV status in 2009, and only 5% of people living with HIV were screened for TB. Although early initiation of antiretroviral therapy significantly reduces the risk of death among HIV-positive people with TB, only 37% of these HIV-positive TB patients got HIV therapy in 2009.<br /> <br /> &bull; According to data compiled by WHO, 10 countries accounted for more than 69% of all people with HIV-related TB in 2009.<br /> <br /> &bull; 25% of all TB deaths are in people with HIV, and there are one million cases of TB in people with HIV a year.<br /> <br /> &bull; Between 2001 and 2009, global HIV incidence steadily declined, with the annual rate of new infections falling by nearly 25%.<br /> <br /> &bull; Above-average declines in HIV incidence have occurred in sub-Saharan Africa and in South and South-East Asia, while Latin America and the Caribbean and Oceania regions experienced more modest reductions of less than 25%.<br /> <br /> &bull; Rates of new infections have remained relatively stable in East Asia, Western and Central Europe, and North America. HIV incidence has steadily increased in the Middle East and North Africa, while in Eastern Europe and Central Asia, a decline in new infections was reversed mid-decade, with incidence rising slightly from 2005 to 2009.<br /> <br /> &bull; Coverage of services to prevent new child infections increased from 15% in 2005 to 54% in 2009. The HIV incidence rate declined by more than 25% between 2001 and 2009. Antiretroviral treatment coverage is increasing.<br /> <br /> &bull; Some 22.5 million people now live with HIV in Africa. The majority (60%) are women and girls. HIV prevalence is as high as 25% in some countries, and the rate of people becoming newly infected outpaces treatment access. Of the 16.6 million children globally who have lost one or both parents to an AIDS-related illness, 14.9 million are in Africa.<br /> <br /> &bull; The Asia Pacific region has made significant progress in controlling HIV&rsquo;s spread. The number of people living with HIV has remained stable for the past five years and estimated new infections are 20% lower than in 2001. Thailand, Cambodia and certain parts of India have turned their epidemics around by providing quality services to their key populations at higher risk.<br /> <br /> &bull; In 2009, median reported prevention coverage for people who inject drugs was 17%; for men who have sex with men 36.5%; and for female sex workers 41%. Programmes in key affected populations to prevent transmission to intimate sexual partners are severely lacking.<br /> <br /> **page**<br /> &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Please <a href="https://im4change.org/hunger-hdi/sdgs-113.html?pgno=5#trends-in-maternal-mortality-1990-to-2008-estimates">click here</a> to access the Trends in Maternal Mortality: 1990 to 2008 Estimates developed by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA and The World Bank:</span><br /> &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">According to [inside]A Fair Chance at Life: Why Equity Matters for Children (2010)[/inside], which has been prepared by Save the Children, please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/A%20fair%20chance%20of%20life.pdf" title="A fair chance of life">click here</a> to access:</span><br /> <span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp; </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;In 2000, the world&rsquo;s governments committed themselves to make a two-thirds reduction in the child mortality rate by 2015 &ndash; the fourth of eight United Nations Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). But with five years to go before the target date, the world is collectively off track to reach MDG 4. Just 40% of the necessary progress has been achieved so far, and in three-quarters of countries the goal will be missed on current trends.&nbsp; </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The child mortality rate at a global level has fallen by just 28% since the MDG baseline year of 1990, far short of the 67% reduction required to meet the goal. Less than 30% of countries are making equitable progress towards MDG 4.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Ghana, Mozambique, Niger, Egypt, Indonesia, Bolivia and Zambia have made equitable progress in reducing child mortality. Chad, Congo, Kenya, South Africa and Zimbabwe have actually seen increases in their child mortality rates since 1990. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;In sub-Saharan Africa, close to one child in seven still dies before their fifth birthday. Although the mortality rate in sub-Saharan Africa has fallen, high fertility levels mean that the absolute number of child deaths in the region has increased since 1990, from 4.2 to 4.6 million.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Almost all child deaths &ndash; 99% &ndash; happen in the developing world. A person born in sub-Saharan Africa can expect to live, on average, 52 years. In western Europe, life expectancy is 80 years. The life expectancy rates in sub-Saharan Africa today have not been seen in Europe since the beginning of the 20th century. In 40 developing countries, children have less chance of living to the age of five than a person in the UK has of living to the age of 65.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Sri Lanka &ndash; with a per capita income of $1,790 &ndash; has a child mortality rate of 13, less than half the level in Guatemala, which has a per capita income of $2,680. Gabon has an equivalent per capita income to Argentina, but a child mortality rate of 57, almost four times higher.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;In India, high levels of selective abortion contribute to skewed male-to-female birth ratios. Son preference in India and China can result in high mortality among girls because they are not adequately breastfed or given the same access to medical treatment. A study of 4,000 children aged between one and two in India found that the likelihood of girls being fully vaccinated was five percentage points lower than that for boys. In Gujarat, India, 50% of women feel they need the permission of their husband or parent-in-law before taking their sick child to a doctor.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;High child mortality, illness and malnutrition can be a brake on economic and social development. Children who are sick and undernourished, especially in the first two years of life, often pay a life-long and irreversible price in terms of physical stunting and reduced cognitive ability.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;On the positive side, of the 68 &lsquo;Countdown to 2015&rsquo; countries (which together account for 97% of maternal and child deaths worldwide), 60 have reduced child mortality since 1990. A recent study found that the rate of reduction has accelerated since 2000, compared with the period from 1990 to 2000.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Of the 68 &lsquo;Countdown to 2015&rsquo; priority countries, only 19 are on-track to reach MDG 4. Eleven more are making faster-than-average progress, but still not enough progress to achieve MDG 4 by 2015.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;It is estimated that children under five make up 85% of those who die as a result of climate change; 44% of child deaths happen in countries considered fragile; and nearly 70% of the countries with the highest child mortality burden are currently experiencing or have experienced armed violence in the last two decades.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Inadequate care before birth and during delivery contributes to 40% of child deaths. Even babies who survive the neonatal period (up to 28 days) have greatly reduced chances of surviving beyond the age of five if their mothers die, in part because they are less likely to receive adequate nutrition and healthcare.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Although the percentage of stunted children decreased globally from 40% to 27% between 1990 and 2010, the number of stunted children is projected to increase in many areas. In Africa, the number of stunted children is estimated to have increased from 45 million in 1990 to 60 million in 2010.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Undernutrition among pregnant women in developing countries leads to one in six infants being born with low birth weight, which not only carries a high risk of neonatal death, but can also permanently damage long-term cognitive and physical development.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Infectious diseases accounted for an estimated 68% of the 8.8 million child deaths in 2008, with pneumonia accounting for 18% and diarrhoea for 15% of the global total. More than 40% of deaths from pneumonia and diarrhoea take place in sub-Saharan Africa, where 42% of people lack access to an improved water source, and almost 70% are without adequate sanitation.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Improved drinking water sources and proper sanitation are crucial to reducing child deaths from diarrhoea, while an estimated 45% of cases could be prevented by simple hand washing with soap.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;If women and men had equal status, it is estimated that the proportion of underweight children below the age of three years would fall by 13 percentage points globally.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">According to [inside]Women on the Front Lines of Health Care, State of the World&#39;s Mothers 2010[/inside], </span><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Women%20on%20the%20front%20line.pdf" title="Women on the front line">click here</a> to access</span><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">: </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Every year, 50 million women in the developing world give birth with no professional help and 8.8 million children and newborns die from easily preventable or treatable causes. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Worldwide, there are 57 countries with critical health workforce shortages, meaning that they have fewer than 23 doctors, nurses and midwives per 10,000 people. Thirty-six of these countries are in sub-Saharan Africa. Making up for these shortages would require an additional 2.4 million doctors, nurses and midwives.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Thirty-six of the countries with critical health worker shortages are in sub-Saharan Africa, which has 12 percent of the world&rsquo;s population, 25 percent of the global burden of disease, and only 3 percent of the world&rsquo;s health workers. South and East Asia have 29 percent of the disease burden and only 12 percent of the health workers.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;41 percent of the child deaths occur among newborn babies in the first month of life.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;99 percent of child and maternal deaths occur in developing countries where mothers and children lack access to basic health-care services.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;250,000 women&rsquo;s lives and 5.5 million children&rsquo;s lives could be saved each year if all women and children had access to a full package of essential health care.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Every year 8.8 million children die before reaching age 5.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Every year 343,000 women lose their lives due to pregnancy or childbirth complications.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;An additional 4.3 million health workers are needed in developing countries to help save lives and meet the health-related Millennium Development Goals.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The eleventh annual Mothers&rsquo; Index helps document conditions for mothers and children in 160 countries &ndash; 43 developed nations and 117 in the developing world &ndash; and shows where mothers fare best and where they face the greatest hardships.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;European countries &ndash; along with New Zealand and Australia &ndash; dominate the top positions while countries in sub-Saharan Africa dominate the lowest tier.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">According to [inside]Performance Audit-Report No. 8 of 2009-10[/inside], please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Performace%20Audit.pdf" title="Performance audit NRHM">click here</a> to access:</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;This is the latest and an extremely significant report on the status and performance of the National Rural Health Mission (NRHM) all over India providing clues for areas of concern and immediate action. Some of the salient features are as follows:</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The performance audit on implementation of the NRHM was conducted during April-December 2008 in the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, State Health Societies (SHS) of 33 States/UTs, District Health Societies (DHS) of 129 districts and 2369 health centres at block and village levels covering the period from 2005-06 to 2007-08.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The NRHM initiated decentralised bottom-up planning. This, however, had been hindered by non-completion of household and facility surveys and State specific perspective plans. In nine States, district level annual plans were not prepared during 2005-08 and in 24 States/UTs block and village level annual plans had not been prepared at all.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Village level health and sanitation committees were still to be constituted in nine States. The Rogi Kalyan Samitis (RKS) formed at many health centres, aiming at community ownership of healthcare delivery systems, were characterised by weak or absent grievance redressal mechanisms, outreach and awareness generation efforts.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;No RKS in any State/UT received all the stipulated central grants. In 13 States/UTs, the Samiti failed to generate internal resources, while in the remaining States no mechanism existed to monitor the generation of a third of the RKS funds from internal resources as prescribed.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The participation of Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs) in the Mission&rsquo;s activities had not been facilitated and their contribution towards capacity building and service delivery was not effectively monitored. 71 per cent of the districts countrywide were yet to be covered under the Mother NGO scheme.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;During the period 2005-06 to 2007-08, the total outlay/expenditure on the NRHM was Rs. 24,151.45 crore. During the first two years the Centre was contributing 100 per cent of the funds. Thereafter, the States were to contribute 15 per cent of funds during the 11th Five Year Plan (2007-12). However, many of the States were yet to contribute their share to the Mission and this issue needs to be addressed. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Many high focus States where diseases are endemic and health indicators poor, were however, receiving relatively lesser central grants, as high unspent balances of previous years remained, indicating that capacity building needs to be focused on.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Basic facilities (proper buildings, hygienic environment, electricity and water supply etc.) were still absent in many existing health centres with many Primary Health Centres (PHCs) and Community Health Centres (CHCs) being unable to provide guaranteed services such as inpatient services, operation theatres, labour rooms, pathological tests, X-ray facilities and emergency care etc.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;While contract workers have been engaged to fill vacancies, there are still shortages of specialist doctors at CHCs, adequate staff nurses at CHCs/PHCs and Auxiliary Nursing Midwife (ANMs)/ Multi-purpose Worker (MPWs) at Sub Centres.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;In nine States, the stock of essential drugs, contraceptives and vaccines adequate for two months consumption as required under norms were not available in any of the test checked PHCs and CHCs.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Despite holding two National Immunisation Days, six Special National Immunisation Days (and additional rounds in selected districts of Bihar and Uttar Pradesh), 1640 new polio cases had been detected in 17 States/UTs during 2005-08.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> <span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">According to [inside]&lsquo;Diarrhoea: Why children are still dying and what can be done?&rsquo; (2009)[/inside], please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Diarrhoea%20Why%20children%20are%20still%20dying%20and%20what%20can%20be%20done.pdf" title="Diarrhoea Why children are still dying and what can be done">click here</a> to access:</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Diarrhoea is defined as having loose or watery stools at least three times per day, or more frequently than normal for an individual. Though most episodes of childhood diarrhoea are mild, acute cases can lead to death and other complications. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The leading cause of diarrhea is lack of sanitation and safe drinking water and the life threatening disease is very easily curable with simple tablets and rehydration. (An estimated 88 per cent of diarrhoeal deaths worldwide are attributable to unsafe water, inadequate sanitation and poor hygiene.)</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Most pathogens that cause diarrhoea share a similar mode of transmission &ndash; from the stool of one person to the mouth of another.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;In India, under-five mortality rate (per 1000 live births) was 69 during 2008. The number of under-five deaths was 18,30,000 during 2008. The percentage of children under-five with diarrhoea receiving ORS packet during 2005-2008 was 26%.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Nearly, nine million children under five years of age die each year. Diarrhoea is second only to pneumonia as the cause of these deaths.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Reducing these deaths depends largely on delivering life-saving treatment of low-osmolarity oral rehydration salts (ORS) and zinc tablets to all children in need.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Examples of rehydrating fluids include cereal-based drinks made from a thin gruel of rice, maize, potato or other readily available low-cost grain or root crop the family has at home. Breastmilk is also an excellent drink for fluid replacement and should continue to be given to infants with diarrhoea simultaneously with other oral rehydration solutions.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;According to the latest available figures, an estimated 2.5 billion people lack improved sanitation facilities, and nearly one billion people do not have access to safe drinking water. These unsanitary environments allow diarrhoea-causing pathogens to spread more easily.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Globally, 1.2 billion people practise open defecation, 83 per cent of whom live in 13 countries</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Together, pneumonia and diarrhoea are responsible for an estimated 40 per cent of all child deaths around the world each year.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Nearly 1 in 4 people in developing countries were practising indiscriminate or open defecation in 2006.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Nearly one in five child deaths &ndash; about 1.5 million each year &ndash; is due to diarrhoea. It kills more young children than AIDS, malaria and measles combined.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Between 1990 and 2006, the proportion of the developing world&rsquo;s population using an improved drinking water source rose from 71 per cent to 84 per cent. Still, almost 1 billion people lack access to improved drinking water sources, and many households do not treat or safely store their household water supplies.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The prevention package highlights five main elements that require a concerted approach in their implementation. The package includes: a) rotavirus and measles vaccinations, b) promotion of early and exclusive breastfeeding and vitamin A supplementation, c) promotion of handwashing with soap, d) improved water supply quantity and quality, including treatment and safe storage of household water, and e) community-wide sanitation promotion.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Mortality from diarrhoea has declined over the past two decades from an estimated 5 million deaths among children under five to 1.5 million deaths in 2004 </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Africa and South Asia are home to more than 80 per cent of child deaths due to diarrhoea</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Improving sanitation facilities has been associated with an estimated median reduction in diarrhoea incidence of 36 per cent across reviewed studies.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Interventions to improve water quality at the source, along with treatment of household water and safe storage systems, have been shown to reduce diarrhoea incidence by as much as 47 per cent.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Diarrhoea often leads to stunting in children due to its association with poor nutrient absorption and appetite loss.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Breastmilk contains the nutrients, antioxidants, hormones and antibodies needed by a child to survive and develop.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Undernourished children are more likely to suffer from diarrhoea and its consequences, which, in turn, increases their chances of worsening nutritional status. Today, 129 million children under the age of five in the developing world are underweight for their age. Together, Africa and South Asia account for more than 80 per cent of total underweight children (25 per cent and 57 per cent, respectively). About 40 per cent of children under five years of age are stunted in Africa, and nearly half in South Asia.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Only 37 per cent of infants in developing countries are exclusively breastfed for the first six months of life.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Boys and girls are equally likely to receive ORS to treat diarrhoea. Children in urban areas (39 percent) are more likely to receive ORS than those living in rural areas (31 per cent). Similarly, children from the wealthiest families are 1.5 times as likely to receive ORS to treat their diarrhoea as the poorest children</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">**page**<em>&nbsp;</em></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">According to the [inside]World Health Statistics 2009[/inside], please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/World%20Health%20Statistics%202009.pdf" title="World Health Statistics 2009">click here</a> to access:</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp; </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The proportion of under-nourished children under five years of age declined from 27% in 1990 to 20% in 2005. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Some 27% fewer children died before their fifth birthday in 2007 than in 1990. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Maternal mortality has barely changed since 1990. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;One third of 9.7 million people in developing countries who need treatment for HIV/AIDS were receiving it in 2007. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;MDG target for reducing the incidence of tuberculosis was met globally in 2004. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;27 countries reported a reduction of up to 50% in the number of malaria cases between 1990 and 2006. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The number of people with access to safe drinking-water rose from 4.1 billion in 1990 to 5.7 billion in 2006. About 1.1 billion people in developing regions gained access to improved sanitation in the same period. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Globally, the proportion of children under five years of age suffering from under-nutrition, according to WHO Child Growth Standards, declined from 27% in 1990 to 20% in 2005. But, the progress is uneven, and an estimated 112 million children are underweight. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Globally, the number of children who die before their fifth birthday has been reduced by 27% from 12.5 million estimated in 1990 to 9 million in 2007. This reduction is due to a combination of interventions, including the use of insecticide-treated mosquito nets for malaria, oral rehydration therapy for diarrhoea, increased access to vaccines for a number of infectious diseases and improved water and sanitation. But pneumonia and diarrhoea continue to kill 3.8 million children aged under five each year, although both conditions are preventable and treatable.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The global maternal mortality ratio of 400 maternal deaths per 100 000 live births in 2005 has barely changed since 1990. Every year an estimated 536 000 women die in pregnancy or childbirth. Most of these deaths occur in sub-Saharan Africa where the maternal mortality ratio is 900 per 100 000 births and where there has been no measurable improvement since 1990. A woman in Africa may face a 1-in-26 lifetime risk of death during pregnancy and childbirth, compared with only 1 in 7300 in the developed regions. 1 There are, however, signs of progress in some countries in Asia and Latin America and the Caribbean.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The percentage of adults living with HIV worldwide has remained stable since 2000 but there were an estimated 2.7 million new infections during 2007. Moreover, deaths are increasing in parts of Africa, particularly eastern and southern Africa. The use of antiretroviral therapy has increased; in 2007, about 1 million more people living with HIV received the treatment. That means one third of the estimated 9.7 million people in developing countries who need the treatment were receiving it. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The MDG target for reducing the incidence of tuberculosis was met globally in 2004. Since then, incidence has continued to fall slowly. Thanks to early detection of new cases and effective treatment using the WHO-recommended DOTS treatment strategy, treatment success rates have been consistently improving, with rates rising from 79% in 1990 to 85% in 2006. Multi-drug resistant tuberculosis is a challenge in countries, such as those of the former Soviet Union, while the lethal combination of HIV and tuberculosis is an issue particularly for sub-Saharan African countries. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Efforts to control malaria are beginning to pay off with significant increases in the proportion of children sleeping under insecticide-treated mosquito nets. Although it is still too early to register the global impact, 27 countries &ndash; including five in Africa &ndash; have reported a reduction of up to 50% in malaria cases between 1990 and 2006. In 2006, the number of cases was estimated to be 250 million globally. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Progress has been made in treating neglected tropical diseases that affect some 1.2 billion people. For example, only 9585 cases of dracunculiasis (guinea-worm disease) were reported in the five countries where the disease is endemic, compared with an estimated 3.5 million reported in 20 such countries in 1985. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;The number of people with access to safe drinking water rose from an estimated 4.1 billion in 1990 to 5.7 billion in 2006. But 900 million people still had to rely on water from what are known as unimproved sources, for example surface water or an unprotected dug well.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Since 1990, an estimated 1.1 billion people in developing regions have gained access to improved sanitation. In 1990, just under 3 billion people had access to sanitation. Their number rose to more than 4 billion by 2006. Yet, in 2006 some 2.5 billion did not have access to improved sanitation and 1.2 billion had to practise open defecation. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;Although nearly all developing countries publish an essential medicines list, the availability of medicines at public health facilities is often poor. Surveys in about 30 developing countries show that availability of selected medicines at health facilities was only 35% in the public sector and 63% in the private sector. Lack of medicines in the public sector often means patients have no choice but to purchase them privately or do without treatment. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">According to [inside]National Family Health Survey-III (2005-06)[/inside], </span><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">please <a href="http://rchiips.org/NFHS/nfhs3.shtml" title="http://rchiips.org/NFHS/nfhs3.shtml">click here</a> to access:<br /> <br /> <u><strong>NFHS III reports declining status of nutrition amidst women</strong></u></span><br /> &nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">The NFHS III paints a mixed picture of India&rsquo;s overall reproductive health status. Women are having fewer children and infant mortality has dropped in the seven-year period since the last NFHS survey in 1998-99. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Anaemia and malnutrition are still widespread among children and adults. And, in an unusual juxtaposition, more adults, especially urban women, are overweight or obese than they were seven years ago. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> <span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:medium"><u><strong>Trend in Family Planning and Fertility</strong></u> </span></span><br /> &nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Fertility has continued to decline since NFHS-2, dropping to an average of 2.7 children from 2.9 children. Ten states, mostly in Southern India, have reached replacement level or below replacement level fertility. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">While son preference remains a barrier to more rapid decline in fertility, an increasing number of women who have only daughters say that they want no more children. In NFHS-3, 62% of women with two daughters and no sons say they want no more children, compared with 47% in NFHS-2. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Declining fertility could be attributed largely to women&rsquo;s increased use of contraception. For the first time ever, more than half of currently married women in India are using contraception, and their use of modern contraceptive methods increased from 43% to 49% between NFHS-2 and NFHS-3. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">A rise in the average age at marriage is also contributing to the drop in fertility. Forty-five percent of women ages 20-24 were married before the legal age of marriage of 18 years, compared with 50% seven years earlier. This shift in age at marriage also influences the median age at first birth, which increased by six months to 19.8 years. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> <span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:medium"><u><strong>Half of Women Lack Proper Care during Pregnancy and Delivery</strong></u></span></span><br /> &nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:medium">&bull;&nbsp;More than three-quarters of pregnant women in India received at least some antenatal care (ANC), but only half of women had at least three ANC visits with a health provider during their pregnancy. </span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull;&nbsp;The disparity between urban and rural women was especially pronounced, with 74% of urban women having ANC at least three times, compared with 43% of rural women. Births assisted by a health professional increased to 49% from 42%, with 75% of urban women but only 39% of rural women in NFHS-3 received assistance from a health professional.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">&bull;&nbsp;Institutional births increased from 34% to 41%, but most women still deliver their children at home. Only about one-third of women received postnatal care within two days of delivery.<br /> <br /> <span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><u><strong>Infant Mortality Drops, but Full Immunization Coverage Shows Little Progress</strong></u></span></span></span></p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Infant mortality continues to decline, dropping from 68 in 1998-99 to 57 in 2005-06 per thousand births. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">There were particularly notable drops in the infant mortality rate in Bihar, Goa, Haryana, Jammu and Kashmir, Meghalaya, Orissa, Punjab, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, and Uttar Pradesh. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Overall, there was only a marginal improvement in full vaccination coverage, with 44% of children ages 12-23 months receiving all recommended vaccinations, up from 42% seven years earlier. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Substantial improvements in coverage have been made in all vaccinations except DPT, which did not change at all between NFHS-2 and NFHS-3. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Gains are particularly evident for polio vaccination coverage, but nearly one-quarter of children age 12-23 months did not receive three recommended doses. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Progress in vaccination coverage varies markedly among the states. In 11 states, there has been a substantial deterioration in full immunization coverage in the last seven years, due to a decline in vaccination coverage for both DPT and polio. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Large decline were seen in Maharashtra, Mizoram, Andhra Pradesh, and Punjab. On the other hand, there was major improvement in full immunization coverage in Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Sikkim, and West Bengal. Other states with marked improvements in full immunization coverage were Assam, Haryana, Jammu and Kashmir, Madhya Pradesh, Meghalaya, and Uttaranchal. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Diarrhoea continues to be a major health problem for many children.&nbsp; Although knowledge about Oral Rehydration Salts (ORS) for the treatment of diarrhoea is widespread among mothers, only 58% of children with diarrhoea were taken to a health facility, down from 65% seven years earlier. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">There has been a rise in the number of dispensaries and hospitals, nursing personnel and doctors (including primary health care centers) in between 1991 and 2005/06, as could be deciphered from the table below.</span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:medium"><u><strong>Trends in health care infrastructure</strong></u> </span></span></p> <div> <table align="justify" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" style="height:96px; width:417px"> <caption> <p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p> </caption> <tbody> <tr> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp;</span></td> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:medium"><strong>1991 </strong></span></span></td> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:medium">&nbsp;<strong>2005/2006</strong></span></span></td> </tr> <tr> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp;SC/PHC/CHC (March 2006)</span></td> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp;57353</span></td> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp;171567</span></td> </tr> <tr> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp;Dispensaries and Hospitals (all) (1.4.2006)</span></td> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp;23555</span></td> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp;32156</span></td> </tr> <tr> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp;Nursing Personnel (2005)</span></td> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp;143887</span></td> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">&nbsp;1481270</span></td> </tr> <tr> </tr> </tbody> </table> </div> ', 'credit_writer' => '', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 10, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'public-health-51', 'meta_title' => '', 'meta_keywords' => '', 'meta_description' => '', 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 51, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 21 $metaTitle = 'Hunger / HDI | Public Health' $metaKeywords = '' $metaDesc = 'KEY TRENDS&nbsp; &nbsp; &bull; The 2019&nbsp;India&nbsp;TB&nbsp;report&nbsp;says&nbsp;that the&nbsp;country&nbsp;accounted for a quarter of the global tuberculosis (TB) burden with an estimated 27 lakh cases in 2018. In 2018, the country was able to achieve a total notification of 21.5 lakh TB cases, of which...' $disp = '<p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">KEY TRENDS&nbsp;</span></p><p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p><div style="text-align:justify">&bull; The 2019&nbsp;India&nbsp;TB&nbsp;report&nbsp;says&nbsp;that the&nbsp;country&nbsp;accounted for a quarter of the global tuberculosis (TB) burden with an estimated 27 lakh cases in 2018. In 2018, the country was able to achieve a total notification of 21.5 lakh TB cases, of which 25 percent was from private sector. Majority of the TB burden is among the working age group. Nearly 89 percent of TB cases came from the age group 15-69 years. About 2/3rd of the TB patients were males <strong>*15</strong></div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify">&bull; Maternal Mortality Ratio for India was 370 in 2000, 286 in 2005, 210 in&nbsp; 2010, 158 in 2015 and 145 in 2017. Therefore, the MMRatio for the country reduced by almost 61 percent between 2000 and 2017. MMRatio for China was 59 in 2000, 44 in 2005, 36 in 2010, 30 in 2015 and 29 in 2017. Therefore, the MMRatio for China fell by around 51 percent between 2000 and 2017 <strong>*14</strong> &nbsp;<br />&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify">&bull; The per capita public expenditure (actual) on health in nominal terms has gone up from Rs. 621 in 2009-10 to Rs. 1,112 in 2015-16. Public expenditure on health (includes health sector expenditure by Centre and States/UTs) as a percentage of GDP was 1.02 percent in 2015-16. There is no significant change in public expenditure on health as a percentage of GDP since 2009-10. The Centre-State share in total public expenditure on health was 31:69 in 2015-16, which used to be 36:64 in 2009-10 <strong>*13</strong><br /><br />&bull; The North-Eastern states had the highest (viz. Rs. 2,878 per capita) and Empowered Action Group (EAG) states (including Assam) had the lowest (viz. Rs. 871 per capita) average per capita public expenditure on health in 2015-16 (excluding UTs). The North-Eastern states had the highest public health expenditure as a percentage of Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP) in 2015-16 (2.76 percent). Public health expenditure as a percentage of GSDP stood at 1.36 percent for EAG states (including Assam) and 0.76 percent for major non-EAG states <strong>*13</strong></div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify">&bull; Of the total disease burden in India in 1990, a tenth was caused by a group of risks including unhealthy diet, high blood pressure, high blood sugar, high cholesterol, and overweight, which mainly contribute to ischaemic heart disease, stroke, and diabetes. The contribution of this group of risks increased massively to a quarter of the total disease burden in India in 2016 <strong>*12</strong><br /><br />&bull; The Out-of-Pocket Expenditure (OOPE) on health by households is Rs. 3,02,425 crores (62.6 percent of total health expenditure, 2.4 percent of GDP, Rs. 2,394 per capita) for the year 2014-15. Private Health Insurance expenditure is Rs. 17,755 crores (3.7 percent of total health expenditure) for the year 2014-15 <strong>*11</strong><br /><br />&bull; Based on available evidence, cardiovascular disease (24 percent), chronic respiratory disease (11 percent), cancer (6 percent) and diabetes (2 percent) are the leading cause of mortality in India <strong>*10</strong><br />&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify">&bull; The total number of dengue cases in India has grown from 28,292 in 2010 to 40,425 in 2014. The total number of dengue related deaths stood at 131 in 2014 <strong>*10</strong></div><div style="text-align:justify"><br />&bull; The Proportion (per 1000) of Ailing Persons (PAP), measured as the number of living persons reporting ailments (per 1000 persons), was 89 persons in rural India and 118 persons in urban India <strong>*9</strong><br />&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify">&bull; Private doctors were the most important single source of non-hospitalized treatment in both the sectors (Rural &amp; Urban). More than 70% (72 per cent in the rural areas and 79 per cent in the urban areas) spells of ailment were treated in the private sector (consisting of private doctors, nursing homes, private hospitals, charitable institutions, etc.) <strong>*9</strong></div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify">&bull; It is observed that in rural India, 42 percent hospitalised treatment was carried out in public hospital and rest 58 percent in private hospital. For the urban India, the corresponding figures were 32 percent and 68 percent. It may be noted in this context that households (or persons within households) were segregated in sector (rural/urban) by their place of domicile, and not by the place of treatment <strong>*9</strong></div><p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p><div style="text-align:justify">&bull; Average medical expenditure per hospitalisation case: Higher amount was spent for treatment per hospitalised case by people in the private hospitals (Rs. 25850) than in the public hospitals (Rs. 6120). The highest expenditure was recorded for treatment of Cancer (Rs. 56712) followed by that for Cardio-vascular diseases (Rs. 31647). Average medical expenditure per non-hospitalisation case was Rs. 509 in rural India and Rs. 639 in urban India <strong>*9</strong><br /><br />&bull; As much as 86 percent of rural population and 82 percent of urban population were still not covered under any scheme of health expenditure support. Government, however, was able to bring about 12 percent urban and 13 percent rural population under health protection coverage through Rastriya Swasthya Bima Yojana (RSBY) or similar plan. Only 12 percent households of the 5th quintile class (Usual Monthly Per Capita Consumer Expenditure) of urban area had some arrangement of medical insurance from private provider <strong>*9</strong></div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify">&bull; The draft National Health Policy 2015 proposes a potentially achievable target of raising public health expenditure to 2.5% of the GDP. It also notes that 40% of this would need to come from Central expenditures. At current prices, a target of 2.5% of GDP translates to Rs. 3800 per capita, representing an almost four fold increase in five years <strong>*8</strong><br />&nbsp;<br />&bull; Maternal mortality ratio (MMR)* in India stood at 560 maternal deaths (per 100000 live births) during 1990, 460 during 1995, 370 during 2000, 280 during 2005 and 190 during 2013. India could reduce MMR by 65 percent between 1990 and 2013<strong> *7</strong><br /><br />&bull; At the country level, the two countries that accounted for one third of all global maternal deaths are India at 17 percent (50000) and Nigeria at 14 percent (40000)<strong> *7</strong><br /><br />&bull; U5MR in India declined by 55 percent from 126 in 1990 to 56 in 2012. Infant Mortality Rate declined from 88 in 1990 to 44 in 2012. Neonatal mortality rate declined from 51 in 1990 to 31 in 2012. U5MR in India among boys declined from 121 in 1990 to 54 in 2012. U5MR in India among girls declined from 130 in 1990 to 59 in 2012. The share of neonatal deaths in under-five deaths stood at 55 percent in 2012 as compared to 41 percent in 1990 <strong>*6</strong><br /><br />&bull; Pneumonia is the leading cause of child mortality in India, responsible for the deaths of nearly 400,000 children under five in 2010 <strong>*5</strong><br /><br />&bull; The Indian Commission on Macroeconomics and Health notes that, in India, 13 household person-days per patient were lost per episode of malaria. Furthermore, the commission estimated that the overall monetary losses to families (income losses together with treatment expenses) could amount to between 200 and 400 Indian rupees (US$ 3.5 to 7) <strong>*4</strong><br /><br />&bull; Odisha is one of the most highly malaria-endemic states in India, accounting for 24% of reported cases in 2010 despite consisting of less of than 4% of the national population. Malaria is particularly common among tribal groups which represent 44% of the population of Orissa <strong>*4</strong><br /><br />&bull; Globally 12% of all deaths among adults aged 30 years and over were attributed to tobacco as compared with 16% in India, 17% in Pakistan and 31% in Bangladesh <strong>*3</strong><br /><br />&bull; A recent study illustrated the economic impact of Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs) in India by estimating that if NCDs like: heart disease, cancer, diabetes, chronic respiratory conditions, and other NCDs were &ldquo;eliminated&rdquo;, the country&rsquo;s 2004 GDP would have been 4 to 10 percent greater<strong> *2</strong><br /><br />&bull; The share of out-of-pocket household health expenditures on NCDs in India increased from 32 percent to 47 percent between 1995&ndash;1996 and 2004. Moreover, 40 percent of these expenditures were financed by borrowing and sales of assets, increasing the household&rsquo;s financial vulnerability<strong> *2</strong><br /><br />&bull; In NFHS-III, 62% of women with two daughters and no sons say they want no more children, compared with 47% in NFHS-II<strong> *1</strong></div><div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>15.</strong> 2019 India TB report, released in 2019, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, please <a href="https://tbcindia.gov.in/WriteReadData/India%20TB%20Report%202019.pdf" title="https://tbcindia.gov.in/WriteReadData/India%20TB%20Report%202019.pdf">click here</a> and <a href="https://tbcindia.gov.in/index1.php?lang=1&amp;level=1&amp;sublinkid=4160&amp;lid=2807" title="https://tbcindia.gov.in/index1.php?lang=1&amp;level=1&amp;sublinkid=4160&amp;lid=2807">click here</a> to access</div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>14.</strong> Trends in Maternal Mortality 2000 to 2017: Estimates by World Health Orgnization (WHO), United Nations Children&#39;s Fund (UNICEF), World Bank Group, United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) and the United Nations Population Division (released in September 2019), please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Maternal%20mortality%20Levels%20and%20trends%202000%20to%202017%20Executive%20Summary.pdf" title="Maternal mortality Levels and trends 2000 to 2017 Executive Summary" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Maternal%20mortality%20Levels%20and%20trends%202000%20to%202017%20Executive%20Summary.pdf" title="Maternal mortality Levels and trends 2000 to 2017 Executive Summary">click here</a> and <a href="https://www.unfpa.org/featured-publication/trends-maternal-mortality-2000-2017" title="https://www.unfpa.org/featured-publication/trends-maternal-mortality-2000-2017">click here</a> to access</div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>13</strong>. National Health Profile 2018, 13th Issue, Central Bureau of Health Intelligence, Ministry of Health &amp; Family Welfare, please <a href="https://im4change.org/docs/900National%20Health%20Profile%202018%2013th%20Issue%20Central%20Bureau%20of%20Health%20Intelligence%20Ministry%20of%20Health%20&amp;%20Family%20Welfare.pdf" title="https://im4change.org/docs/900National%20Health%20Profile%202018%2013th%20Issue%20Central%20Bureau%20of%20Health%20Intelligence%20Ministry%20of%20Health%20&amp;%20Family%20Welfare.pdf">click here</a> to access&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>12. </strong>India: Health of the Nation&rsquo;s States - The India State-Level Disease Burden Initiative, Disease Burden Trends in the States of India 1990 to 2016 (released in October, 2017), prepared by Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), Public Health Foundation of India (PHFI), Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) and Ministry of Health &amp; Family Welfare (MoHFW), please <a href="https://im4change.org/docs/11592India_Health_of.pdf" title="https://im4change.org/docs/11592India_Health_of.pdf">click here</a> to access</div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>11</strong>. National Health Accounts: Estimates for India 2014-15 (released in October, 2017), prepared by the National Health Accounts Technical Secretariat, National Health Systems Resource Centre and Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/National%20Health%20Accounts%20Estimates%20Report%202014-15.pdf" title="National Health Accounts Estimates for India 2014-15" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/National%20Health%20Accounts%20Estimates%20Report%202014-15.pdf" title="National Health Accounts Estimates for India 2014-15">click here</a> to access</div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>10</strong>. National Health Profile 2015, Central Bureau of Health Intelligence, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (please <a href="http://www.cbhidghs.nic.in/E-Book%20HTML-2015/index.html" title="http://www.cbhidghs.nic.in/E-Book%20HTML-2015/index.html">click here</a> to access)</div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>9</strong>. 71st round NSS report: Key Indicators of Social Consumption in India-Health (published in June 2015), please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/nss_71st_ki_health_30june15.pdf" title="NSS 71st Round Health" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/nss_71st_ki_health_30june15.pdf" title="NSS 71st Round Health">click here</a> to access the full report; please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/NSS%20Press%20Release%20Health.pdf" title="NSS Press Note Health" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/NSS%20Press%20Release%20Health.pdf" title="NSS Press Note Health">click here</a> to read the summary of findings</div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>8</strong>. Draft National Health Policy 2015 (published in December 2014), Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (Please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Draft%20National%20Health%20Policy%202015.pdf" title="Draft NHP 2015" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Draft%20National%20Health%20Policy%202015.pdf" title="Draft NHP 2015">click here</a> to download)</div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>7</strong>. United Nations&#39; report (released in May, 2014) entitled Trends in maternal mortality estimates 1990 to 2013,&nbsp;</span>(please&nbsp;<a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Trends%20in%20Maternal%20Mortality%201990%20to%202013.pdf" title="Trends in Maternal Mortality 1990 to 2013" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Trends%20in%20Maternal%20Mortality%201990%20to%202013.pdf" title="Trends in Maternal Mortality 1990 to 2013">click here</a>&nbsp;to download)</div><div style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</div><p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><strong>6. </strong><a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/APR_Progress_Report_2013_9_Sept_2013_1.pdf" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/APR_Progress_Report_2013_9_Sept_2013_1.pdf">Committing to Child Survival</a>: A Promise Renewed Progress Report 2013, UNICEF </span></span></p></div><p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>5</strong>. Pneumonia Progress Report, 2012, released by IVAC and John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012.pdf" title="Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012.pdf" title="Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012">click here</a> to access</span></p><p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p><div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>4</strong>. Defeating malaria in Asia, the Pacific, Americas, Middle East and Europe (2012), World Health Organization and PATH,&nbsp;</span></div><p style="text-align:justify"><a href="http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Defeating%20malaria.pdf" title="http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Defeating%20malaria.pdf">http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Defeat<br />ing%20malaria.pdf</a></p><p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>3</strong>. WHO Global Report: Mortality Attributable to Tobacco (2012), please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/WHO%20report%20on%20Tobacco.pdf" title="WHO " title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/WHO%20report%20on%20Tobacco.pdf" title="WHO ">click here</a> to access&nbsp;&nbsp;</span></p><p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>2</strong>. The Growing Danger of Non-Communicable Diseases: Acting Now to Reverse Course, September, 2011, The World Bank, please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/WBDeepeningCrisis.pdf" title="WBDeepeningCrisis" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/WBDeepeningCrisis.pdf" title="WBDeepeningCrisis">click here</a> to access</span></p><p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>1</strong>. National Family Health Survey III (2005-06), please <a href="http://rchiips.org/NFHS/nfhs3.shtml" title="http://rchiips.org/NFHS/nfhs3.shtml">click here</a> to access &nbsp;</span></p><p style="text-align:justify">&nbsp;</p><p style="text-align:justify">' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>hunger-hdi/public-health-51.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>Hunger / HDI | Public Health | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content="KEY TRENDS • The 2019 India TB report says that the country accounted for a quarter of the global tuberculosis (TB) burden with an estimated 27 lakh cases in 2018. In 2018, the country was able to achieve a total notification of 21.5 lakh TB cases, of which..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Public Health</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">KEY TRENDS </span></p><p style="text-align:justify"> </p><div style="text-align:justify">• The 2019 India TB report says that the country accounted for a quarter of the global tuberculosis (TB) burden with an estimated 27 lakh cases in 2018. In 2018, the country was able to achieve a total notification of 21.5 lakh TB cases, of which 25 percent was from private sector. Majority of the TB burden is among the working age group. Nearly 89 percent of TB cases came from the age group 15-69 years. About 2/3rd of the TB patients were males <strong>*15</strong></div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><div style="text-align:justify">• Maternal Mortality Ratio for India was 370 in 2000, 286 in 2005, 210 in 2010, 158 in 2015 and 145 in 2017. Therefore, the MMRatio for the country reduced by almost 61 percent between 2000 and 2017. MMRatio for China was 59 in 2000, 44 in 2005, 36 in 2010, 30 in 2015 and 29 in 2017. Therefore, the MMRatio for China fell by around 51 percent between 2000 and 2017 <strong>*14</strong> <br /> </div><div style="text-align:justify">• The per capita public expenditure (actual) on health in nominal terms has gone up from Rs. 621 in 2009-10 to Rs. 1,112 in 2015-16. Public expenditure on health (includes health sector expenditure by Centre and States/UTs) as a percentage of GDP was 1.02 percent in 2015-16. There is no significant change in public expenditure on health as a percentage of GDP since 2009-10. The Centre-State share in total public expenditure on health was 31:69 in 2015-16, which used to be 36:64 in 2009-10 <strong>*13</strong><br /><br />• The North-Eastern states had the highest (viz. Rs. 2,878 per capita) and Empowered Action Group (EAG) states (including Assam) had the lowest (viz. Rs. 871 per capita) average per capita public expenditure on health in 2015-16 (excluding UTs). The North-Eastern states had the highest public health expenditure as a percentage of Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP) in 2015-16 (2.76 percent). Public health expenditure as a percentage of GSDP stood at 1.36 percent for EAG states (including Assam) and 0.76 percent for major non-EAG states <strong>*13</strong></div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><div style="text-align:justify">• Of the total disease burden in India in 1990, a tenth was caused by a group of risks including unhealthy diet, high blood pressure, high blood sugar, high cholesterol, and overweight, which mainly contribute to ischaemic heart disease, stroke, and diabetes. The contribution of this group of risks increased massively to a quarter of the total disease burden in India in 2016 <strong>*12</strong><br /><br />• The Out-of-Pocket Expenditure (OOPE) on health by households is Rs. 3,02,425 crores (62.6 percent of total health expenditure, 2.4 percent of GDP, Rs. 2,394 per capita) for the year 2014-15. Private Health Insurance expenditure is Rs. 17,755 crores (3.7 percent of total health expenditure) for the year 2014-15 <strong>*11</strong><br /><br />• Based on available evidence, cardiovascular disease (24 percent), chronic respiratory disease (11 percent), cancer (6 percent) and diabetes (2 percent) are the leading cause of mortality in India <strong>*10</strong><br /> </div><div style="text-align:justify">• The total number of dengue cases in India has grown from 28,292 in 2010 to 40,425 in 2014. The total number of dengue related deaths stood at 131 in 2014 <strong>*10</strong></div><div style="text-align:justify"><br />• The Proportion (per 1000) of Ailing Persons (PAP), measured as the number of living persons reporting ailments (per 1000 persons), was 89 persons in rural India and 118 persons in urban India <strong>*9</strong><br /> </div><div style="text-align:justify">• Private doctors were the most important single source of non-hospitalized treatment in both the sectors (Rural & Urban). More than 70% (72 per cent in the rural areas and 79 per cent in the urban areas) spells of ailment were treated in the private sector (consisting of private doctors, nursing homes, private hospitals, charitable institutions, etc.) <strong>*9</strong></div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><div style="text-align:justify">• It is observed that in rural India, 42 percent hospitalised treatment was carried out in public hospital and rest 58 percent in private hospital. For the urban India, the corresponding figures were 32 percent and 68 percent. It may be noted in this context that households (or persons within households) were segregated in sector (rural/urban) by their place of domicile, and not by the place of treatment <strong>*9</strong></div><p style="text-align:justify"> </p><div style="text-align:justify">• Average medical expenditure per hospitalisation case: Higher amount was spent for treatment per hospitalised case by people in the private hospitals (Rs. 25850) than in the public hospitals (Rs. 6120). The highest expenditure was recorded for treatment of Cancer (Rs. 56712) followed by that for Cardio-vascular diseases (Rs. 31647). Average medical expenditure per non-hospitalisation case was Rs. 509 in rural India and Rs. 639 in urban India <strong>*9</strong><br /><br />• As much as 86 percent of rural population and 82 percent of urban population were still not covered under any scheme of health expenditure support. Government, however, was able to bring about 12 percent urban and 13 percent rural population under health protection coverage through Rastriya Swasthya Bima Yojana (RSBY) or similar plan. Only 12 percent households of the 5th quintile class (Usual Monthly Per Capita Consumer Expenditure) of urban area had some arrangement of medical insurance from private provider <strong>*9</strong></div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><div style="text-align:justify">• The draft National Health Policy 2015 proposes a potentially achievable target of raising public health expenditure to 2.5% of the GDP. It also notes that 40% of this would need to come from Central expenditures. At current prices, a target of 2.5% of GDP translates to Rs. 3800 per capita, representing an almost four fold increase in five years <strong>*8</strong><br /> <br />• Maternal mortality ratio (MMR)* in India stood at 560 maternal deaths (per 100000 live births) during 1990, 460 during 1995, 370 during 2000, 280 during 2005 and 190 during 2013. India could reduce MMR by 65 percent between 1990 and 2013<strong> *7</strong><br /><br />• At the country level, the two countries that accounted for one third of all global maternal deaths are India at 17 percent (50000) and Nigeria at 14 percent (40000)<strong> *7</strong><br /><br />• U5MR in India declined by 55 percent from 126 in 1990 to 56 in 2012. Infant Mortality Rate declined from 88 in 1990 to 44 in 2012. Neonatal mortality rate declined from 51 in 1990 to 31 in 2012. U5MR in India among boys declined from 121 in 1990 to 54 in 2012. U5MR in India among girls declined from 130 in 1990 to 59 in 2012. The share of neonatal deaths in under-five deaths stood at 55 percent in 2012 as compared to 41 percent in 1990 <strong>*6</strong><br /><br />• Pneumonia is the leading cause of child mortality in India, responsible for the deaths of nearly 400,000 children under five in 2010 <strong>*5</strong><br /><br />• The Indian Commission on Macroeconomics and Health notes that, in India, 13 household person-days per patient were lost per episode of malaria. Furthermore, the commission estimated that the overall monetary losses to families (income losses together with treatment expenses) could amount to between 200 and 400 Indian rupees (US$ 3.5 to 7) <strong>*4</strong><br /><br />• Odisha is one of the most highly malaria-endemic states in India, accounting for 24% of reported cases in 2010 despite consisting of less of than 4% of the national population. Malaria is particularly common among tribal groups which represent 44% of the population of Orissa <strong>*4</strong><br /><br />• Globally 12% of all deaths among adults aged 30 years and over were attributed to tobacco as compared with 16% in India, 17% in Pakistan and 31% in Bangladesh <strong>*3</strong><br /><br />• A recent study illustrated the economic impact of Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs) in India by estimating that if NCDs like: heart disease, cancer, diabetes, chronic respiratory conditions, and other NCDs were “eliminated”, the country’s 2004 GDP would have been 4 to 10 percent greater<strong> *2</strong><br /><br />• The share of out-of-pocket household health expenditures on NCDs in India increased from 32 percent to 47 percent between 1995–1996 and 2004. Moreover, 40 percent of these expenditures were financed by borrowing and sales of assets, increasing the household’s financial vulnerability<strong> *2</strong><br /><br />• In NFHS-III, 62% of women with two daughters and no sons say they want no more children, compared with 47% in NFHS-II<strong> *1</strong></div><div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>15.</strong> 2019 India TB report, released in 2019, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, please <a href="https://tbcindia.gov.in/WriteReadData/India%20TB%20Report%202019.pdf" title="https://tbcindia.gov.in/WriteReadData/India%20TB%20Report%202019.pdf">click here</a> and <a href="https://tbcindia.gov.in/index1.php?lang=1&level=1&sublinkid=4160&lid=2807" title="https://tbcindia.gov.in/index1.php?lang=1&level=1&sublinkid=4160&lid=2807">click here</a> to access</div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>14.</strong> Trends in Maternal Mortality 2000 to 2017: Estimates by World Health Orgnization (WHO), United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF), World Bank Group, United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) and the United Nations Population Division (released in September 2019), please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Maternal%20mortality%20Levels%20and%20trends%202000%20to%202017%20Executive%20Summary.pdf" title="Maternal mortality Levels and trends 2000 to 2017 Executive Summary" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Maternal%20mortality%20Levels%20and%20trends%202000%20to%202017%20Executive%20Summary.pdf" title="Maternal mortality Levels and trends 2000 to 2017 Executive Summary">click here</a> and <a href="https://www.unfpa.org/featured-publication/trends-maternal-mortality-2000-2017" title="https://www.unfpa.org/featured-publication/trends-maternal-mortality-2000-2017">click here</a> to access</div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>13</strong>. National Health Profile 2018, 13th Issue, Central Bureau of Health Intelligence, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, please <a href="https://im4change.org/docs/900National%20Health%20Profile%202018%2013th%20Issue%20Central%20Bureau%20of%20Health%20Intelligence%20Ministry%20of%20Health%20&%20Family%20Welfare.pdf" title="https://im4change.org/docs/900National%20Health%20Profile%202018%2013th%20Issue%20Central%20Bureau%20of%20Health%20Intelligence%20Ministry%20of%20Health%20&%20Family%20Welfare.pdf">click here</a> to access </div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>12. </strong>India: Health of the Nation’s States - The India State-Level Disease Burden Initiative, Disease Burden Trends in the States of India 1990 to 2016 (released in October, 2017), prepared by Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), Public Health Foundation of India (PHFI), Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) and Ministry of Health & Family Welfare (MoHFW), please <a href="https://im4change.org/docs/11592India_Health_of.pdf" title="https://im4change.org/docs/11592India_Health_of.pdf">click here</a> to access</div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>11</strong>. National Health Accounts: Estimates for India 2014-15 (released in October, 2017), prepared by the National Health Accounts Technical Secretariat, National Health Systems Resource Centre and Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/National%20Health%20Accounts%20Estimates%20Report%202014-15.pdf" title="National Health Accounts Estimates for India 2014-15" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/National%20Health%20Accounts%20Estimates%20Report%202014-15.pdf" title="National Health Accounts Estimates for India 2014-15">click here</a> to access</div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>10</strong>. National Health Profile 2015, Central Bureau of Health Intelligence, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (please <a href="http://www.cbhidghs.nic.in/E-Book%20HTML-2015/index.html" title="http://www.cbhidghs.nic.in/E-Book%20HTML-2015/index.html">click here</a> to access)</div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>9</strong>. 71st round NSS report: Key Indicators of Social Consumption in India-Health (published in June 2015), please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/nss_71st_ki_health_30june15.pdf" title="NSS 71st Round Health" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/nss_71st_ki_health_30june15.pdf" title="NSS 71st Round Health">click here</a> to access the full report; please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/NSS%20Press%20Release%20Health.pdf" title="NSS Press Note Health" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/NSS%20Press%20Release%20Health.pdf" title="NSS Press Note Health">click here</a> to read the summary of findings</div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>8</strong>. Draft National Health Policy 2015 (published in December 2014), Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (Please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Draft%20National%20Health%20Policy%202015.pdf" title="Draft NHP 2015" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Draft%20National%20Health%20Policy%202015.pdf" title="Draft NHP 2015">click here</a> to download)</div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>7</strong>. United Nations' report (released in May, 2014) entitled Trends in maternal mortality estimates 1990 to 2013, </span>(please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Trends%20in%20Maternal%20Mortality%201990%20to%202013.pdf" title="Trends in Maternal Mortality 1990 to 2013" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Trends%20in%20Maternal%20Mortality%201990%20to%202013.pdf" title="Trends in Maternal Mortality 1990 to 2013">click here</a> to download)</div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><strong>6. </strong><a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/APR_Progress_Report_2013_9_Sept_2013_1.pdf" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/APR_Progress_Report_2013_9_Sept_2013_1.pdf">Committing to Child Survival</a>: A Promise Renewed Progress Report 2013, UNICEF </span></span></p></div><p style="text-align:justify"> </p><p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>5</strong>. Pneumonia Progress Report, 2012, released by IVAC and John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012.pdf" title="Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012.pdf" title="Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012">click here</a> to access</span></p><p style="text-align:justify"> </p><div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>4</strong>. Defeating malaria in Asia, the Pacific, Americas, Middle East and Europe (2012), World Health Organization and PATH, </span></div><p style="text-align:justify"><a href="http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Defeating%20malaria.pdf" title="http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Defeating%20malaria.pdf">http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Defeat<br />ing%20malaria.pdf</a></p><p style="text-align:justify"> </p><p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>3</strong>. WHO Global Report: Mortality Attributable to Tobacco (2012), please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/WHO%20report%20on%20Tobacco.pdf" title="WHO " title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/WHO%20report%20on%20Tobacco.pdf" title="WHO ">click here</a> to access </span></p><p style="text-align:justify"> </p><p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>2</strong>. The Growing Danger of Non-Communicable Diseases: Acting Now to Reverse Course, September, 2011, The World Bank, please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/WBDeepeningCrisis.pdf" title="WBDeepeningCrisis" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/WBDeepeningCrisis.pdf" title="WBDeepeningCrisis">click here</a> to access</span></p><p style="text-align:justify"> </p><p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>1</strong>. National Family Health Survey III (2005-06), please <a href="http://rchiips.org/NFHS/nfhs3.shtml" title="http://rchiips.org/NFHS/nfhs3.shtml">click here</a> to access </span></p><p style="text-align:justify"> </p><p style="text-align:justify"> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 21, 'title' => 'Public Health', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">KEY TRENDS </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <div style="text-align:justify">• The 2019 India TB report says that the country accounted for a quarter of the global tuberculosis (TB) burden with an estimated 27 lakh cases in 2018. In 2018, the country was able to achieve a total notification of 21.5 lakh TB cases, of which 25 percent was from private sector. Majority of the TB burden is among the working age group. Nearly 89 percent of TB cases came from the age group 15-69 years. About 2/3rd of the TB patients were males <strong>*15</strong></div> <div style="text-align:justify"> </div> <div style="text-align:justify">• Maternal Mortality Ratio for India was 370 in 2000, 286 in 2005, 210 in 2010, 158 in 2015 and 145 in 2017. Therefore, the MMRatio for the country reduced by almost 61 percent between 2000 and 2017. MMRatio for China was 59 in 2000, 44 in 2005, 36 in 2010, 30 in 2015 and 29 in 2017. Therefore, the MMRatio for China fell by around 51 percent between 2000 and 2017 <strong>*14</strong> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align:justify">• The per capita public expenditure (actual) on health in nominal terms has gone up from Rs. 621 in 2009-10 to Rs. 1,112 in 2015-16. Public expenditure on health (includes health sector expenditure by Centre and States/UTs) as a percentage of GDP was 1.02 percent in 2015-16. There is no significant change in public expenditure on health as a percentage of GDP since 2009-10. The Centre-State share in total public expenditure on health was 31:69 in 2015-16, which used to be 36:64 in 2009-10 <strong>*13</strong><br /> <br /> • The North-Eastern states had the highest (viz. Rs. 2,878 per capita) and Empowered Action Group (EAG) states (including Assam) had the lowest (viz. Rs. 871 per capita) average per capita public expenditure on health in 2015-16 (excluding UTs). The North-Eastern states had the highest public health expenditure as a percentage of Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP) in 2015-16 (2.76 percent). Public health expenditure as a percentage of GSDP stood at 1.36 percent for EAG states (including Assam) and 0.76 percent for major non-EAG states <strong>*13</strong></div> <div style="text-align:justify"> </div> <div style="text-align:justify">• Of the total disease burden in India in 1990, a tenth was caused by a group of risks including unhealthy diet, high blood pressure, high blood sugar, high cholesterol, and overweight, which mainly contribute to ischaemic heart disease, stroke, and diabetes. The contribution of this group of risks increased massively to a quarter of the total disease burden in India in 2016 <strong>*12</strong><br /> <br /> • The Out-of-Pocket Expenditure (OOPE) on health by households is Rs. 3,02,425 crores (62.6 percent of total health expenditure, 2.4 percent of GDP, Rs. 2,394 per capita) for the year 2014-15. Private Health Insurance expenditure is Rs. 17,755 crores (3.7 percent of total health expenditure) for the year 2014-15 <strong>*11</strong><br /> <br /> • Based on available evidence, cardiovascular disease (24 percent), chronic respiratory disease (11 percent), cancer (6 percent) and diabetes (2 percent) are the leading cause of mortality in India <strong>*10</strong><br /> </div> <div style="text-align:justify">• The total number of dengue cases in India has grown from 28,292 in 2010 to 40,425 in 2014. The total number of dengue related deaths stood at 131 in 2014 <strong>*10</strong></div> <div style="text-align:justify"><br /> • The Proportion (per 1000) of Ailing Persons (PAP), measured as the number of living persons reporting ailments (per 1000 persons), was 89 persons in rural India and 118 persons in urban India <strong>*9</strong><br /> </div> <div style="text-align:justify">• Private doctors were the most important single source of non-hospitalized treatment in both the sectors (Rural & Urban). More than 70% (72 per cent in the rural areas and 79 per cent in the urban areas) spells of ailment were treated in the private sector (consisting of private doctors, nursing homes, private hospitals, charitable institutions, etc.) <strong>*9</strong></div> <div style="text-align:justify"> </div> <div style="text-align:justify">• It is observed that in rural India, 42 percent hospitalised treatment was carried out in public hospital and rest 58 percent in private hospital. For the urban India, the corresponding figures were 32 percent and 68 percent. It may be noted in this context that households (or persons within households) were segregated in sector (rural/urban) by their place of domicile, and not by the place of treatment <strong>*9</strong></div> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <div style="text-align:justify">• Average medical expenditure per hospitalisation case: Higher amount was spent for treatment per hospitalised case by people in the private hospitals (Rs. 25850) than in the public hospitals (Rs. 6120). The highest expenditure was recorded for treatment of Cancer (Rs. 56712) followed by that for Cardio-vascular diseases (Rs. 31647). Average medical expenditure per non-hospitalisation case was Rs. 509 in rural India and Rs. 639 in urban India <strong>*9</strong><br /> <br /> • As much as 86 percent of rural population and 82 percent of urban population were still not covered under any scheme of health expenditure support. Government, however, was able to bring about 12 percent urban and 13 percent rural population under health protection coverage through Rastriya Swasthya Bima Yojana (RSBY) or similar plan. Only 12 percent households of the 5th quintile class (Usual Monthly Per Capita Consumer Expenditure) of urban area had some arrangement of medical insurance from private provider <strong>*9</strong></div> <div style="text-align:justify"> </div> <div style="text-align:justify">• The draft National Health Policy 2015 proposes a potentially achievable target of raising public health expenditure to 2.5% of the GDP. It also notes that 40% of this would need to come from Central expenditures. At current prices, a target of 2.5% of GDP translates to Rs. 3800 per capita, representing an almost four fold increase in five years <strong>*8</strong><br /> <br /> • Maternal mortality ratio (MMR)* in India stood at 560 maternal deaths (per 100000 live births) during 1990, 460 during 1995, 370 during 2000, 280 during 2005 and 190 during 2013. India could reduce MMR by 65 percent between 1990 and 2013<strong> *7</strong><br /> <br /> • At the country level, the two countries that accounted for one third of all global maternal deaths are India at 17 percent (50000) and Nigeria at 14 percent (40000)<strong> *7</strong><br /> <br /> • U5MR in India declined by 55 percent from 126 in 1990 to 56 in 2012. Infant Mortality Rate declined from 88 in 1990 to 44 in 2012. Neonatal mortality rate declined from 51 in 1990 to 31 in 2012. U5MR in India among boys declined from 121 in 1990 to 54 in 2012. U5MR in India among girls declined from 130 in 1990 to 59 in 2012. The share of neonatal deaths in under-five deaths stood at 55 percent in 2012 as compared to 41 percent in 1990 <strong>*6</strong><br /> <br /> • Pneumonia is the leading cause of child mortality in India, responsible for the deaths of nearly 400,000 children under five in 2010 <strong>*5</strong><br /> <br /> • The Indian Commission on Macroeconomics and Health notes that, in India, 13 household person-days per patient were lost per episode of malaria. Furthermore, the commission estimated that the overall monetary losses to families (income losses together with treatment expenses) could amount to between 200 and 400 Indian rupees (US$ 3.5 to 7) <strong>*4</strong><br /> <br /> • Odisha is one of the most highly malaria-endemic states in India, accounting for 24% of reported cases in 2010 despite consisting of less of than 4% of the national population. Malaria is particularly common among tribal groups which represent 44% of the population of Orissa <strong>*4</strong><br /> <br /> • Globally 12% of all deaths among adults aged 30 years and over were attributed to tobacco as compared with 16% in India, 17% in Pakistan and 31% in Bangladesh <strong>*3</strong><br /> <br /> • A recent study illustrated the economic impact of Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs) in India by estimating that if NCDs like: heart disease, cancer, diabetes, chronic respiratory conditions, and other NCDs were “eliminated”, the country’s 2004 GDP would have been 4 to 10 percent greater<strong> *2</strong><br /> <br /> • The share of out-of-pocket household health expenditures on NCDs in India increased from 32 percent to 47 percent between 1995–1996 and 2004. Moreover, 40 percent of these expenditures were financed by borrowing and sales of assets, increasing the household’s financial vulnerability<strong> *2</strong><br /> <br /> • In NFHS-III, 62% of women with two daughters and no sons say they want no more children, compared with 47% in NFHS-II<strong> *1</strong></div> <div> <div style="text-align:justify"> </div> <div style="text-align:justify"> </div> <div style="text-align:justify"><strong>15.</strong> 2019 India TB report, released in 2019, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, please <a href="https://tbcindia.gov.in/WriteReadData/India%20TB%20Report%202019.pdf">click here</a> and <a href="https://tbcindia.gov.in/index1.php?lang=1&level=1&sublinkid=4160&lid=2807">click here</a> to access</div> <div style="text-align:justify"> </div> <div style="text-align:justify"><strong>14.</strong> Trends in Maternal Mortality 2000 to 2017: Estimates by World Health Orgnization (WHO), United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF), World Bank Group, United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) and the United Nations Population Division (released in September 2019), please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Maternal%20mortality%20Levels%20and%20trends%202000%20to%202017%20Executive%20Summary.pdf" title="Maternal mortality Levels and trends 2000 to 2017 Executive Summary">click here</a> and <a href="https://www.unfpa.org/featured-publication/trends-maternal-mortality-2000-2017">click here</a> to access</div> <div style="text-align:justify"> </div> <div style="text-align:justify"><strong>13</strong>. National Health Profile 2018, 13th Issue, Central Bureau of Health Intelligence, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, please <a href="https://im4change.org/docs/900National%20Health%20Profile%202018%2013th%20Issue%20Central%20Bureau%20of%20Health%20Intelligence%20Ministry%20of%20Health%20&%20Family%20Welfare.pdf">click here</a> to access </div> <div style="text-align:justify"> </div> <div style="text-align:justify"><strong>12. </strong>India: Health of the Nation’s States - The India State-Level Disease Burden Initiative, Disease Burden Trends in the States of India 1990 to 2016 (released in October, 2017), prepared by Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), Public Health Foundation of India (PHFI), Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) and Ministry of Health & Family Welfare (MoHFW), please <a href="https://im4change.org/docs/11592India_Health_of.pdf">click here</a> to access</div> <div style="text-align:justify"> </div> <div style="text-align:justify"><strong>11</strong>. National Health Accounts: Estimates for India 2014-15 (released in October, 2017), prepared by the National Health Accounts Technical Secretariat, National Health Systems Resource Centre and Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/National%20Health%20Accounts%20Estimates%20Report%202014-15.pdf" title="National Health Accounts Estimates for India 2014-15">click here</a> to access</div> <div style="text-align:justify"> </div> <div style="text-align:justify"><strong>10</strong>. National Health Profile 2015, Central Bureau of Health Intelligence, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (please <a href="http://www.cbhidghs.nic.in/E-Book%20HTML-2015/index.html">click here</a> to access)</div> <div style="text-align:justify"> </div> <div style="text-align:justify"><strong>9</strong>. 71st round NSS report: Key Indicators of Social Consumption in India-Health (published in June 2015), please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/nss_71st_ki_health_30june15.pdf" title="NSS 71st Round Health">click here</a> to access the full report; please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/NSS%20Press%20Release%20Health.pdf" title="NSS Press Note Health">click here</a> to read the summary of findings</div> <div style="text-align:justify"> </div> <div style="text-align:justify"><strong>8</strong>. Draft National Health Policy 2015 (published in December 2014), Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (Please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Draft%20National%20Health%20Policy%202015.pdf" title="Draft NHP 2015">click here</a> to download)</div> <div style="text-align:justify"> </div> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>7</strong>. United Nations' report (released in May, 2014) entitled Trends in maternal mortality estimates 1990 to 2013, </span>(please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Trends%20in%20Maternal%20Mortality%201990%20to%202013.pdf" title="Trends in Maternal Mortality 1990 to 2013">click here</a> to download)</div> <div style="text-align:justify"> </div> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><strong>6. </strong><a href="tinymce/uploaded/APR_Progress_Report_2013_9_Sept_2013_1.pdf">Committing to Child Survival</a>: A Promise Renewed Progress Report 2013, UNICEF </span></span></p> </div> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>5</strong>. Pneumonia Progress Report, 2012, released by IVAC and John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012.pdf" title="Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012">click here</a> to access</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>4</strong>. Defeating malaria in Asia, the Pacific, Americas, Middle East and Europe (2012), World Health Organization and PATH, </span></div> <p style="text-align:justify"><a href="http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Defeating%20malaria.pdf">http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Defeating%20malaria.pdf</a></p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>3</strong>. WHO Global Report: Mortality Attributable to Tobacco (2012), please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/WHO%20report%20on%20Tobacco.pdf" title="WHO ">click here</a> to access </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>2</strong>. The Growing Danger of Non-Communicable Diseases: Acting Now to Reverse Course, September, 2011, The World Bank, please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/WBDeepeningCrisis.pdf" title="WBDeepeningCrisis">click here</a> to access</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>1</strong>. National Family Health Survey III (2005-06), please <a href="http://rchiips.org/NFHS/nfhs3.shtml">click here</a> to access </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The key findings of the [inside]Global Tuberculosis Report 2022 (released in October 2022)[/inside] by World Health Organization are as follows (please click <a href="/upload/files/Global%20Tuberculosis%20Report%202022.pdf">here</a> and <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022">here</a> to access): </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>India-specific findings</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The case notifications of people newly diagnosed with TB in India were 16,67,136 in 2015, 17,63,876 in 2016, 16,49,694 in 2017, 19,08,683 in 2018, 21,62,323 in 2019, 16,29,301 in 2020, and 19,65,444 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/covid-19-and-tb">click here</a> to access the data. </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Between 2019 and 2020, India witnessed a reduction of 24.65 percent in case notifications of people newly diagnosed with TB. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/covid-19-and-tb ">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Between 2019 and 2021, India faced a reduction of 9.1 percent in case notifications of people newly diagnosed with TB. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/covid-19-and-tb ">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Almost all (90 percent) of the global drop in the number of people newly diagnosed with TB and reported (notified) between 2019 and 2020 was accounted for by 10 countries; the top three, India, Indonesia and the Philippines, accounted for 67 percent. In 2021, 90 percent of the reduction compared with 2019 was accounted for by only five countries. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/covid-19-and-tb ">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Among the 30 high TB burden and 3 global TB watchlist countries, the largest relative reductions in annual notifications between 2019 and 2020 were (ordered according to the size of the relative reduction) in Philippines, Lesotho, Indonesia, Zimbabwe, India, Myanmar and Bangladesh (all >20 percent). In 2021, there was considerable recovery in India, Indonesia and the Philippines, although not to 2019 levels. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/covid-19-and-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• In 2021, eight countries accounted for more than two thirds of global TB cases: India (28 percent), Indonesia (9.2 percent), China (7.4 percent), the Philippines (7.0 percent), Pakistan (5.8 percent), Nigeria (4.4 percent), Bangladesh (3.6 percent) and Democratic Republic of the Congo (2.9 percent). Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-1-tb-incidence">click here</a> to access data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Trends in the TB incidence rate in the 30 high TB burden countries are mixed. Between 2020 and 2021, there were estimated increases in countries with major shortfalls in TB notifications in 2020 and 2021 (e.g. India, Indonesia, Myanmar, Philippines), while in others the previous decline in the TB incidence rate has slowed or stabilized. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-1-tb-incidence">click here</a> to access data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• TB incidence rates for India were 341 per lakh population in 2000, 340 per lakh population in 2001, 339 per lakh population in 2002, 337 per lakh population in 2003, 334 per lakh population in 2004, 329 per lakh population in 2005, 323 per lakh population in 2006, 316 per lakh population in 2007, 309 per lakh population in 2008, 300 per lakh population in 2009, 292 per lakh population in 2010, 284 per lakh population in 2011, 277 per lakh population in 2012, 270 per lakh population in 2013, 263 per lakh population in 2014, 256 per lakh population in 2015, 249 per lakh population in 2016, 234 per lakh population in 2017, 224 per lakh population in 2018, 214 per lakh population in 2019, 204 per lakh population in 2020, and 210 per lakh population in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-1-tb-incidence">click here</a> to access data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• TB case notification rates (of new and relapse cases) for India were 105 per lakh population in 2000, 101 per lakh population in 2001, 97 per lakh population in 2002, 96 per lakh population in 2003, 100 per lakh population in 2004, 100 per lakh population in 2005, 105 per lakh population in 2006, 109 per lakh population in 2007, 110 per lakh population in 2008, 110 per lakh population in 2009, 108 per lakh population in 2010, 105 per lakh population in 2011, 101 per lakh population in 2012, 96 per lakh population in 2013, 123 per lakh population in 2014, 126 per lakh population in 2015, 132 per lakh population in 2016, 122 per lakh population in 2017, 139 per lakh population in 2018, 156 per lakh population in 2019, 117 per lakh population in 2020, and 140 per lakh population in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-1-tb-incidence">click here</a> to access data. </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• In 2021, 82 percent of global TB deaths among HIV-negative people occurred in the WHO African and South-East Asia regions; India alone accounted for 36 percent. The African and South-East Asia regions accounted for 82 percent of the combined total of TB deaths in HIV-negative and HIV-positive people; India accounted for 32 percent. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-2-tb-mortality">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Trends in the number of TB deaths in the 30 high TB burden countries are mixed. Between 2019 and 2021, striking increases are estimated to have occurred in countries with major shortfalls in TB notifications in 2020 and 2021 (e.g. India, Indonesia, Myanmar, Philippines), while in others previous declines have slowed or stabilized. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-2-tb-mortality">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The estimated absolute numbers of TB deaths (HIV-positive and HIV-negative) in India were 7,10,000 in 2000, 7,00,000 in 2001, 6,90,000 in 2002, 6,70,000 in 2003, 6,50,000 in 2004, 6,40,000 in 2005, 6,30,000 in 2006, 6,30,000 in 2007, 5,90,000 in 2008, 5,80,000 in 2009, 5,50,000 in 2010, 5,40,000 in 2011, 5,30,000 in 2012, 5,20,000 in 2013, 4,90,000 in 2014, 4,70,000 in 2015, 4,60,000 in 2016, 4,60,000 in 2017, 4,60,000 in 2018, 4,50,000 in 2019, 4,80,000 in 2020, and 5,10,000 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-2-tb-mortality">click here</a> to access the data.<br /> <br /> • The estimated numbers of incident cases of Multidrug- and rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/RR-TB) were 1,49,000 in 2015, 1,44,000 in 2016, 1,35,000 in 2017, 129,000 in 2018, 123,000 in 2019, 1,17,000 in 2020, and 1,19,000 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-3-drug-resistant-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The countries with the largest share of incident cases of MDR/RR-TB in 2021 were India (26 percent of global cases), the Russian Federation (8.5 percent of global cases) and Pakistan (7.9 percent of global cases). Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-3-drug-resistant-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• In 2019–2021, the first-ever national survey was completed in India; this was one of the largest surveys to date, with a sample size of about 3,20,000 people. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2.4-tb-prevalence-surveys">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• In 2020, the first full year of the COVID-19 pandemic, there were particularly large absolute and relative reductions in India, Indonesia and Philippines, followed by some recovery in 2021. </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The number of notifications of people newly diagnosed with TB (new and relapse cases, all forms) was 11,15,718 in 2000, 10,85,075 in 2001, 10,60,951 in 2002, 10,73,282 in 2003, 11,36,182 in 2004, 11,56,248 in 2005, 12,28,827 in 2006, 12,95,943 in 2007, 13,32,267 in 2008, 13,51,913 in 2009, 13,39,866 in 2010, 13,23,949 in 2011, 12,89,836 in 2012, 12,43,905 in 2013, 16,09,547 in 2014, 16,67,136 in 2015, 17,63,876 in 2016, 16,49,694 in 2017, 19,08,683 in 2018, 21,62,323 in 2019, 16,29,301 in 2020, and 19,65,444 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-1-case-notifications ">click here</a> to access the data. </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The number of estimated TB incident cases in India was 36,10,000 in 2000, 36,70,000 in 2001, 37,20,000 in 2002, 37,60,000 in 2003, 37,90,000 in 2004, 38,00,000 in 2005, 37,90,000 in 2006, 37,60,000 in 2007, 37,20,000 in 2008, 36,80,000 in 2009, 36,30,000 in 2010, 35,70,000 in 2011, 35,30,000 in 2012, 34,80,000 in 2013, 34,40,000 in 2014, 33,90,000 in 2015, 33,30,000 in 2016, 31,60,000 in 2017, 30,60,000 in 2018, 29,60,000 in 2019, 28,50,000 in 2020, and 29,50,000 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-1-case-notifications ">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The contribution of public-private mix (PPM) initiatives to total notifications was 2.3 percent in 2010, 0.26 percent in 2011, 0.24 percent in 2012, 6.0 percent in 2013, 12.0 percent in 2014, 11.0 percent in 2015, 17.0 percent in 2016, 23.0 percent in 2017, 26.0 percent in 2018, 28.0 percent in 2019, 31.0 percent in 2020, and 33.0 percent in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-1-case-notifications ">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The percentage of people in India newly diagnosed with pulmonary TB who were bacteriologically confirmed was 35 percent in 2000, 41 percent in 2001, 44 percent in 2002, 49 percent in 2003, 53 percent in 2004, 56 percent in 2005, 58 percent in 2006, 60 percent in 2007, 61 percent in 2008, 62 percent in 2009, 63 percent in 2010, 65 percent in 2011, 66 percent in 2012, 71 percent in 2013, 66 percent in 2014, 64 percent in 2015, 63 percent in 2016, 71 percent in 2017, 57 percent in 2018, 57 percent in 2019, 54 percent in 2020, and 66 percent in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-2-diagnostic-testing-for-tb--hiv-associated-tb-and-drug-resistant-tb">click here</a> to access the data</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The number of WHO-recommended rapid tests used per 1,00,000 population in the case of India was 258 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-2-diagnostic-testing-for-tb--hiv-associated-tb-and-drug-resistant-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The percentage of people in India initially tested for TB with a WHO-recommended rapid test who had a positive test was 24 percent in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-2-diagnostic-testing-for-tb--hiv-associated-tb-and-drug-resistant-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The number of WHO-recommended rapid diagnostic tests per person notified as a TB case (new and relapse cases, all forms) in India was 1.8 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-2-diagnostic-testing-for-tb--hiv-associated-tb-and-drug-resistant-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The estimated TB treatment coverage for India was 67 percent in 2021. The estimated TB treatment coverage among children aged 0–14 years for India was 32 percent in 2021. The estimated TB treatment coverage among children aged >= 15 years for India was 71 percent in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-3-tb-treatment-and-treatment-coverage">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• In 2021, ten countries accounted for 75 percent of the global gap between the estimated number of people who developed TB (incident TB cases) and the number of people who were detected with TB and officially reported. About 60 percent of the global gap was accounted for by five countries: India (24 percent), Indonesia (13 percent), the Philippines (10 percent), Pakistan (6.6 percent) and Nigeria (6.3 percent). Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-3-tb-treatment-and-treatment-coverage">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The estimated coverage of antiretroviral therapy for people living with HIV who developed TB for India 59 percent in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-3-tb-treatment-and-treatment-coverage">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The number of Indian people diagnosed with MDR/RR-TB was 3,288 in 2010, 4,297 in 2011, 17,253 in 2012, 18,888 in 2013, 25,748 in 2014, 28,876 in 2015, 37,258 in 2016, 39,009 in 2017, 58,347 in 2018, 66,255 in 2019, 49,679 in 2020, and 58,837 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-4-drug-resistant-tb-treatment">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The number of Indian people enrolled on MDR/RR-TB was 2,182 in 2010, 3,378 in 2011, 14,117 in 2012, 21,093 in 2013, 24,073 in 2014, 26,966 in 2015, 32,914 in 2016, 35,950 in 2017, 47,284 in 2018, 60,858 in 2019, 42,505 in 2020, and 53,037 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-4-drug-resistant-tb-treatment">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The number of Indian people enrolled on MDR/RR-TB was 2,182 in 2010, 3,378 in 2011, 14,117 in 2012, 21,093 in 2013, 24,073 in 2014, 26,966 in 2015, 32,914 in 2016, 35,950 in 2017, 47,284 in 2018, 60,858 in 2019, 42,505 in 2020, and 53,037 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-4-drug-resistant-tb-treatment">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The WHO regions with the best treatment coverage are the European Region and the Region of the Americas. Among the 30 high MDR/RR-TB burden countries, those with the best treatment coverage are 2021: Peru, the Russian Federation, Azerbaijan, the Republic of Moldova, India and Kazakhstan. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-4-drug-resistant-tb-treatment">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The estimated treatment coverage for MDR/RR-TB for India was 45 percent in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-4-drug-resistant-tb-treatment">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Seven countries (India, Nigeria, South Africa, Uganda, United Republic of Tanzania, Zambia and Zimbabwe) each reported initiating over 200 000 people with HIV on TB preventive treatment in 2021, accounting collectively for 82 percent of the 2.8 million reported globally. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-prevention">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Since 2014, spending on the diagnosis and treatment of drug-susceptible TB has fallen slightly. Spending on treatment of multidrug and rifampicin-resistant TB (MDR/RR-TB) has increased steadily since 2010: this growth is largely explained by trends in the BRICS group of countries (i.e., Brazil, Russian Federation, India, China and South Africa). Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/financing-for-tb">click here</a> to access the data. </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Bangladesh, Cambodia, China and Zambia are examples of high TB burden countries that have steadily increased domestic funding specifically allocated to NTPs (as opposed to funding allocated more generally for inpatient and outpatient care, including for people with TB) in recent years. There was a considerable reduction in domestic spending in India between 2020 and 2021; one explanation for this was less need for spending on second-line anti-TB drugs in 2021, given stocks that still existed from 2020. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/financing-for-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The international funding (at constant 2021 US$) for national TB programmes on TB prevention, diagnostic and treatment services was 37 million in 2010, 65 million in 2011, 61 million in 2012, 143 million in 2013, 92 million in 2014, 142 million in 2015, 135 million in 2016, 187 million in 2017, 170 million in 2018, 91 million in 2019, 85 million in 2020, and 154 million in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/financing-for-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The domestic funding (at constant 2021 US$) for national TB programmes on TB prevention, diagnostic and treatment services was 56 million in 2010, 60 million in 2011, 44 million in 2012, 85 million in 2013, 162 million in 2014, 132 million in 2015, 139 million in 2016, 305 million in 2017, 348 million in 2018, 365 million in 2019, 326 million in 2020, and 183 million in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/financing-for-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• In the case of India, the sources of funding and funding gaps reported for the TB-specific budgets included in national strategic plans for TB were domestic funding: 66 percent, Global Fund: 29 percent, and international funding (excluding Global Fund): 4.9 percent in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/financing-for-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The distribution of the two UHC indicators in the 30 high TB burden countries and three global TB watchlist countries shows that, in general, values improve with income level; this is especially evident for the SCI. Nonetheless, the risk of catastrophic health expenditures is high (15 or above) in several middle-income countries, including Angola, Bangladesh, Cambodia, China, India, and Nigeria. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/uhc-tb-determinants/6.1-universal-health-coverage">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• To achieve Universal Health Coverage (UHC), substantial increases in investment in health are critical. From 2000 to 2019 there was a striking increase in health expenditure (from all sources) per capita in a few high TB burden countries, especially the upper-middle-income countries of Brazil, China, South Africa and Thailand. A steady upward trend was evident in Bangladesh, Ethiopia, India, Indonesia, Lesotho, Mongolia, Mozambique, the Philippines and Viet Nam, and there was a noticeable rise from 2012 to 2017 in Myanmar. Elsewhere, however, levels of spending have been relatively stable, and at generally much lower levels. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/uhc-tb-determinants/6.1-universal-health-coverage">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The current health expenditures per capita were US$ 86 in 2000, US$ 96 in 2001, US$ 99 in 2002, US$ 101 in 2003, US$ 109 in 2004, US$ 114 in 2005, US$ 119 in 2006, US$ 126 in 2007, US$ 131 in 2008, US$ 139 in 2009, US$ 141 in 2010, US$ 146 in 2011, US$ 162 in 2012, US$ 190 in 2013, US$ 189 in 2014, US$ 197 in 2015, US$ 205 in 2016, US$ 182 in 2017, US$ 196 in 2018, and US$ 211 in 2019. Kindly <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/uhc-tb-determinants/6.1-universal-health-coverage">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The estimated number of TB cases attributable to alcohol use disorders was 2,58,000, diabetes was 1,05,000, HIV was 93,000, smoking was 1,10,000 and undernourishment was 7,38,000 in 2021. Kindly <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/uhc-tb-determinants/6-3-tb-determinants">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Based on the latest available data in the World Bank database, some upper-middle-income and lower-middle-income countries (e.g. Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, Mongolia, South Africa, Thailand, and Viet Nam) appear to be performing relatively well. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/uhc-tb-determinants/6-3-tb-determinants">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Three new antigen-based skin tests for TB infection that perform better than tuberculin skin tests (particularly in terms of specificity) were evaluated and recommended by WHO in 2022; these are the Cy-Tb skin test, Serum Institute of India, India; C-TST, Anhui Zhifei Longcom Biopharmaceutical Co. Ltd, China; and Diaskintest, JSC Generium, Russian Federation. WHO plans to evaluate the following tests in the coming year: culture-free, targeted-sequencing solutions to test for drug resistance directly from sputum specimens; broth microdilution methods for drug-susceptibility testing (DST); and new IGRAs to test for TB infection. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-research-and-innovation">click here</a> to access the information.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• In India, the Ministry of Health & Family Welfare launched the 21-day TB Mukt Bharat Campaign at Ayushman Bharat Health and Wellness Centres (AB-HWCs), from 24 March to 14 April 2022. The campaign aimed to meaningfully engage community and civil society to build a people’s movement to end TB. It was celebrated across 75 228 AB-HWCs; a total of 6 801 956 people were screened for TB, and 38 328 community awareness activities took place using 21 479 trained TB champions. Linked to this initiative, primary health care teams led by the newly introduced cadre of community health officers (CHOs) provide people-centred TB services to people’s doorsteps. AB-HWCs are playing an important role in improving awareness, identifying TB symptoms at an early stage, offering treatment adherence and psychosocial support to individuals and families with TB, and creating a strong network of TB survivors to strengthen the TB response. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/featured-topics/civil-society-engagement">click here</a> to access the more information.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• WHO has been advancing MAF-TB efforts to strengthen the engagement of the private sector and other public care providers not linked to national TB programmes (NTPs) through a new initiative with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. The initiative promotes the development of enhanced PPM data dashboards in seven priority countries: Bangladesh, India, Indonesia, Kenya, Nigeria, Pakistan and the Philippines. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/featured-topics/maf-tb">click here</a> to get more information.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• India has developed a national multisectoral action framework for TB; this strategic document makes a strong case for transforming India’s TB elimination efforts from a health sector struggle to a whole-of-society responsibility. The framework is a guide for policy-makers and a call to action for communities, civil society, the private sector, and other partners and stakeholders. The overarching goal is to strengthen the country’s capacity for a multisectoral response that facilitates TB elimination by 2025, with the key objective being to achieve policy convergence and adopt a health-in-all approach. The framework highlights the six key strategic areas for integrated action: integrated health care service delivery; TB-free workplaces; socioeconomic support for patients; awareness generation and infection control; corporate social responsibility and investment in TB; and targeted intervention for key affected populations. It defines the list of government ministries and other stakeholders, and the strategic scope of collaboration with each of them. Also, the framework acknowledges the importance of resources for defined strategic areas (e.g. financing, capacity-building, technical resources and research), and calls on partners and governments to mobilize resources for its implementation. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/featured-topics/maf-tb">click here</a> to get more information.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The key findings of the report titled [inside]Rural Health Statistics 2020-21 (released in May 2022)[/inside], which has been prepared by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, are as follows (please <a href="/upload/files/Rural%20Health%20Statistics%202020-21.pdf">click here</a> to access):</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• As on 31st March, 2021, there were 1,56,101 and 1,718 Sub Centres (SCs), 25,140 and 5,439 Primary Health Centres (PHCs), and 5,481 and 470 Community Health Centres (CHCs), respectively, which were functioning in rural and urban areas of the country.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The average rural population covered by a Sub Centre was 5,734 as on 1st July, 2021, whereas the norm is that one Sub Centre should be serving a population of size in the range 300-5,000.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The average population in tribal/ hilly/ desert areas covered by a Sub Centre was 3,839 as on 1st July, 2021, whereas the norm is that one Sub Centre should be serving a population of size up to 3,000 in such areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• A Sub Centre is the most peripheral and first contact point between the primary health care system and the community. Sub Centres are assigned tasks relating to interpersonal communication in order to bring about behavioral change and provide services in relation to maternal and child health, family welfare, nutrition, immunisation, diarrhoea control and control of communicable diseases programmes. Each Sub Centre is required to be manned by at least one auxiliary nurse midwife (ANM) / female health worker and one male health worker. Under the National Rural Health Mission (NRHM), there is a provision for one additional second ANM on contract basis. One lady health visitor (LHV) is entrusted with the task of supervision of six Sub Centres. The Government of India bears the salary of ANM and LHV while the salary of the Male Health Worker is borne by the state governments.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The average rural population covered by a Primary Health Centre (PHC) was 35,602 as on 1st July, 2021, whereas the norm is that one PHC should be serving a population of size in the range 20,000-30,000.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The average population in tribal/ hilly/ desert areas covered by a PHC was 25,507 as on 1st July, 2021, whereas the norm is that one PHC should be serving a population of size up to 20,000 in such areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• PHC is the first contact point between the village community and the medical officer. The PHCs were envisaged to provide an integrated curative and preventive health care to the rural population with emphasis on preventive and promotive aspects of health care. The PHCs are established and maintained by the state governments under the Minimum Needs Programme (MNP)/ Basic Minimum Services (BMS) Programme. As per minimum requirement, a PHC is to be manned by a medical officer supported by 14 paramedical and other staff. Under NRHM, there is a provision for two additional staff nurses at PHCs on contract basis. It acts as a referral unit for 6 Sub Centres and has 4-6 beds for patients. The activities of PHC involve curative, preventive, promotive and family welfare services.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The average rural population covered by a Community Health Centre (CHC) was 1,63,298 as on 1st July, 2021, whereas the norm is that one CHC should be serving a population of size in the range 80,000-1,20,000.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The average population in tribal/ hilly/ desert areas covered by a CHC was 1,03,756 as on 1st July, 2021, whereas the norm is that one CHC should be serving a population of size up to 80,000 in such areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• CHCs are being established and maintained by the state government under Minimum Needs Program (MNP)/Basic Minimum Services (BMS) programme. As per minimum norms, a CHC is required to be manned by four medical specialists i.e. surgeon, physician, gynecologist and pediatrician supported by 21 paramedical and other staff. It has 30 indoor beds with one OT, X-ray, labour room and laboratory facilities. It serves as a referral centre for 4 PHCs and also provides facilities for obstetric care and specialist consultations.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Rural Health Care System in India</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Out of the sanctioned posts, a significant percentage of posts were vacant at all the levels. Nearly 21.1 percent of the sanctioned posts of Health Worker (Female)/ Auxiliary Nurse Midwife-ANM (at SCs and PHCs) were vacant as compared to 41.9 percent vacancies of Health Worker (Male) in 2021 at SCs. At PHCs, 64.2 percent of the sanctioned posts of Health Assistant (Male and Female) and 21.8 percent of the sanctioned posts of Doctors were vacant in 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The availability of manpower is one of the important prerequisites for the efficient functioning of the Rural Health services. As on 31st March, 2021, the overall shortfall (which excludes the existing surplus in some of the states) in the posts of Health Worker (Female) / ANM was 2.9 percent of the total requirement as per the norm of one HW(F)/ ANM per Sub Centre and PHC. The overall shortfall was mainly due to shortfall in states of Uttar Pradesh (1,871), Himachal Pradesh (1,253), Gujarat (616), Odisha (397), Tripura (380), and Uttarakhand (252). Similarly, in case of Health Worker (Male), there was a shortfall of 66.1 percent of the requirement. There was a vacancy of 21.1 percent for HW (Female)/ ANM (at SCs and PHCs) as compared to the sanctioned posts. There was a vacancy of 41.9 percent for Health Worker (Male) as compared to the sanctioned posts in 2021 at SCs. At PHCs, 64.2 percent of the sanctioned posts of Health Assistant (Male and Female) and 21.8 percent of the sanctioned posts of Doctors were vacant in 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• PHC is the first contact point between the village community and the Medical Officer. Manpower in PHC includes a Medical Officer supported by paramedical and other staff. In the case of PHC, for Health Assistant (male + female), the shortfall was 72.2 percent. For allopathic doctors at PHC, there was a shortfall of 4.3 percent of the total requirement at the national level. This happened due to a significant shortfall of doctors at PHCs in the states of Odisha (362), Karnataka (340), and Chhattisgarh (271).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The Community Health Centres provide specialised medical care of Surgeons, Obstetricians & Gynecologists, Physicians and Pediatricians. The position of specialists manpower at CHCs as on 31st March, 2021 shows that out of the sanctioned posts, 72.3 percent of Surgeons, 64.2 percent of Obstetricians & Gynecologists, 69.2 percent of physicians, and 67.1 percent of pediatricians were vacant. Overall 68 percent of the sanctioned posts of specialists at CHCs were vacant in rural areas. Moreover, as compared to requirements for existing infrastructure, there was a shortfall of 83.2 percent of Surgeons, 74.2 percent of Obstetricians & Gynecologists, 82.2 percent of Physicians, and 80.6 percent of Pediatricians. Overall, there was a shortfall of 79.9 percent of specialists at the CHCs as compared to the requirement for existing CHCs. The shortfall of specialists was significantly high in most of the states. However, in addition to the specialists, about 17,012 General Duty Medical Officers (GDMOs) Allopathic and 514 AYUSH Specialists along with 2,955 GDMO AYUSH were also available at CHCs as on 31st March, 2021. In addition to this, there were 805 Anaesthetists and 289 Eye Surgeons available at CHCs as on 31st March, 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Comparison of the manpower position of major categories in 2021 with that in 2020 shows an overall increase in the number of ANMs at SCs & PHCs and Doctors at PHCs during the period. However, there was a marginal decrease in the number of Specialists at CHCs. There was an increase of ANMs at SCs & PHCs from 2,12,593 in 2020 to 2,14,820 in 2021 and Doctors at PHCs from 28,516 in 2020 to 31,716 in 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Considering the status of paramedical staff, there was an increase of Lab Technicians from 19,903 in 2020 to 22,723 in 2021 at PHCs and CHCs. There was an increase in the number of pharmacists from 25,792 in 2020 to 28,537 in 2021. A significant increase was also observed for nursing staff under PHC & CHCs from 71,847 in 2020 to 79,044 in 2021. The number of radiographers decreased from 2,434 in 2020 to 2,418 in 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• A total of 1,224 Sub Divisional/ Sub District Hospitals were functioning as on 31st March, 2021 throughout the country. In these hospitals, 15,274 doctors were available. In addition to these doctors, nearly 42,073 paramedical staffs were also available at those hospitals as on 31st March, 2021. The number of doctors in Sub Divisional/ Sub District Hospitals increased from 13,399 in 2020 to 15,274 in 2021. The number of paramedical staff in Sub Divisional/ Sub District Hospitals also went up from 29,937 in 2020 to 42,073 in 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• In addition to the above, 764 District Hospitals (DHs) were also functioning as on 31st March, 2021 throughout the country. There were 26,929 doctors available in the DHs. In addition to the doctors, roughly 90,435 paramedical staff were also available at District Hospitals as on 31st March, 2021. The number of doctors in District Hospitals went up from 22,827 in 2020 to 26,929 in 2021. The number of paramedical staff in District Hospitals increased from 80,920 in 2020 to 90,435 in 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The key findings of the report titled [inside]India TB Report 2022: Coming Together to End TB Altogether (released in March 2022)[/inside], which has been produced by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, are as follows (please <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/TB%20Annual%20Report%202022.pdf">click here</a> to access): </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• As per the Global TB Report 2021, the estimated incidence of all forms of TB in India for the year 2020 was 188 per 100,000 population (129-257 per 100,000 population). </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The total number of incident tuberculosis i.e., TB patients (new and relapse) notified during 2021 was 19,33,381 which was 19 percent higher than that of 2020 (16,28,161). The programme had been able to catch-up with the dip in TB notifications that was observed around the months when the two major covid waves happened in India.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The estimated incidence of all forms of TB in India as per Global TB report was 456 per lakh population in 2010, 437 per lakh population in 2011, 420 per lakh population in 2012, 404 per lakh population in 2013, 350 per lakh population in 2014, 328 per lakh population in 2015, 303 per lakh population in 2016, 286 per lakh population in 2017, 276 per lakh population in 2018, 266 per lakh population in 2019, and 257 per lakh population in 2020. </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The estimated number of Multidrug-resistant (MDR) and Extensively drug-resistant (XDR) TB cases to have been put on treatment as per the global TB report 2021 was 4 per 100,000 and 1 per 100,000 population, respectively. </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• During the pandemic, a significant reduction was observed in the total number of Drug-Resistant TB (DR-TB) patients started on treatment as compared to 2019. In 2020 and 2021, there was a reduction of 14 percent and 9 percent in the number MDR patients put on treatment as compared to the estimated numbers.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The estimated mortality rate among all forms of TB was 37 per 100,000 population (34-40 per 100,000 population) in 2020, as per the Global TB Report 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• There has been a slight increase in the mortality rate due to all forms of TB between 2019 and 2020 by 11 percent in the country. </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• In absolute numbers, the total number of estimated deaths from all forms of TB excluding HIV, for 2020 was 4.93 lakhs (4.53-5.36 lakhs) in the country, which was 13 percent higher that of the year 2019 estimate. </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• As per Nikshay, the total number of reported deaths among Drug sensitive (DS-TB) notified in 2020 was 76,002 (4.3 percent of the total notifications of 2020) which is 15.4 percent of the estimate for the country, thus emphasizing the importance of establishing a “TB Death Surveillance and Response” system in line with the maternal mortality surveillance to improve the coverage and real time resolution of lacunae including the system related factors. </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• A recent systematic review (2020) estimating the direct and indirect patient costs of drug-sensitive and drug-resistant TB care in India reports that 7 to 32 percent of among DS-TB patients and 68 percent of DR-TB were experiencing catastrophic costs for TB care in India.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• In 2021, among 21,35,830 patients diagnosed, 20,30,509 (95 percent) patients were put on treatment. 61 percent were male and 39 percent were female among the patients put on treatment.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Among the total notification, 6 percent patients were in paediatric age group. Among 17,51,437 TB patients notified in 2020, 83 percent were successfully treated while 4 percent died during treatment.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• In 2021, 48,232 MDR/RR-TB patients were diagnosed and 43,380 (90 percent) were put on treatment. 8,455 Pre-XDR-TB, 376 XDR-TB and 13,724 H mono/poly patients were diagnosed and 7,562 (89 percent), 333 (89 percent) and 12,008 (87 percent) were put on treatment respectively.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• A total of 1939 patients were initiated on shorter oral Bdq-containing MDR/RR-TB regimen, 23,889 on longer M/XDR-TB regimen and 25,235 patients were initiated on shorter injection containing MDR-TB regimen.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The cohort of DR-TB patients initiated on treatment in 2019 reported 57 percent treatment success rate (34,535/60,873). This includes 39,358 of patients on shorter MDR-TB regimen (inj-containing) with 59 percent treatment success rate and 1,280 of patient on longer oral regimen with 70 percent treatment success rate. This cohort also includes 11,791 patients put on old conventional MDR-TB regimen that has reported 49 percent treatment success rate.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Available evidence and modelling studies indicate that nearly 20 percent of all TB cases in India may suffer from Diabetes Mellitus (DM). </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Under the National Tuberculosis Elimination Programme (NTEP), in 2021, out of the 74 percent of the known tobacco usage among all TB patients, 12 percent of TB patients were reported to be tobacco users. Among those screened, 30 percent were linked to tobacco cessation services.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Of all the notified TB patients, 95 percent know their HIV status. (Public: 96 percent, Private: 92 percent).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Nearly 95 percent of TB Detection Centres (TDCs) have co-located HIV testing facilities.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• More than 96 percent of People Living With HIV/AIDS (PLHIV) visiting the antiretroviral therapy (ART) centres every month are screened for existing TB symptoms. </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• As per Nikshay data, the linkage of HIV-TB co-infected patients to Cotrimoxazole Preventive Therapy (CPT) and Antiretroviral Therapy in 2021 were 93 percent & 95 percent, respectively.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Kindly click <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/JSA-Press-Statement-UB-2022-23-English-Final.pdf">here</a> and <a href="https://im4change.org/latest-news-updates/union-health-budget-2022-23-has-completely-overlooked-the-lessons-of-the-covid-19-epidemic-says-jan-swasthya-abhiyan.html">here</a> to access the [inside]Press release by Jan Swasthya Abhiyan dated February 2, 2022[/inside] on the Union Health Budget 2022-23.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">---</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The COVID-19 pandemic has devastated families and communities and disrupted societies and economies. Patients had to endure various indignities in both public and private hospitals without protections or recourse to adequate preventive and redressal mechanisms. While the COVID-19 vaccine is seen as a solution to the pandemic, its roll-out has also been rife with inequalities. However, many of the problems we have seen at this time stem from the deep-rooted problems in the public health system. A critical look at India"s health system from the perspective of its patients is overdue.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Oxfam India undertook two rapid surveys on Patient"s Rights Charter and COVID-19 vaccination through self-administered questionnaires, covering 28 states and 5 Union territories; as such, this bears the limitations arising from it being a self-selected sample. The former was done between February and April 2021 and received 3890 responses while the latter was done between August and September 2021 covering 10,955 respondents. Given the distinctive focus of each survey, both are presented separately.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The key findings of the survey on Patient's Rights done for Oxfam India report titled [inside]Securing Rights of Patients in India: Lessons from rapid surveys on peoples’ experiences of Patient’s Rights Charter and the COVID-19 vaccination drive (released on 18 November, 2021)[/inside] are as follows (please <a href="/upload/files/Securing%20Rights%20of%20Patients%20in%20India%20by%20Oxfam%20India.pdf">click here</a> to access): </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• This captures some of the experience of patients with both the public and private healthcare system over the last decade with a focus on the provisions of the Patients "Rights Charter. </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Right to Confidentiality, Human Dignity and Privacy: Over a third of women (35 percent) said that they had to undergo a physical examination by a male practitioner without another female present in the room.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Right to Information: 74 percent of people said that the doctor simply wrote the prescription or treatment or asked them to get tests/ investigations done without explaining their disease, nature and/or cause of illness.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Right to Informed Consent: More than half of the respondents (57 percent) who were themselves/ their relatives had been hospitalised did not receive any information about investigations and tests being done.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Right to Second Opinion: At least a third of respondents who had themselves/ their relatives hospitalised said their doctor did not allow a second opinion.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Right to Non-Discrimination: A third of Muslim respondents and over 20 percent Dalit and Adivasi respondents reported feeling discriminated against on the grounds of their religion or caste in a hospital/ by a healthcare professional.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Right to Choose Source of Obtaining Medicine or Test: 8 in 10 respondents reported being asked to get tests/diagnostics from one place only.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Right to Transparency in Rates and Care According to Prescribed Rates: 58 percent of people of those who had themselves/ their relatives hospitalised, said that they were not provided with an estimated cost of treatment/procedure before the start of treatment/procedure. Three in every 10 people surveyed reported being denied case papers, patient records, investigation reports for treatment/ procedure by the hospital even after requesting the same.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Right to Take Discharge of Patient or Receive Body of Deceased from the Hospital: 19 percent of respondents whose close relatives were hospitalized said that they were denied the release of the dead body by the hospital</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em>The COVID-19 pandemic has deepened existing structural inequalities in the healthcare system. The report recommends:</em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The MoHFW should set up a mechanism to review the present status of adoption of the Patient"s Rights Charter (PRC) in all states and UTs and order its immediate adoption. It should include the PRC in the Clinical Establishment Act (CEA) and issue a letter to the states and Union territories (UTs) for displaying PRC in all private and public hospitals in view of the unprecedented crisis induced by the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly for hospitals taking part in the Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (PMJAY).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The State and UT governments should issue orders to display the PRC in all private and public hospitals irrespective of adoption of CEA and ensure grievance redressal mechanisms for patients, through the appointment of an internal grievance officer within every public and private clinical establishment.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The National Medical Commission should introduce mandatory modules on patients "rights in the healthcare curriculum.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em>Some of the key findings from the survey of the experiences of the vaccination drive were:</em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Eight out of 10 people said that they do not think that the government will be able to vaccinate all adults by December 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• 80 percent of people believed that it is more difficult for a daily wage worker to get the vaccine as compared to a salaried, middle-class person. Most did not think that the experience was equitable.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• With respect to how the government should address inequity in vaccination, some specific suggestions were: </p> <p style="text-align:justify">- 83 percent believed that all vaccination should be done completely free of cost through the government, like previous vaccination drives.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">- Only 2 percent of respondents were in favour of a tax on essentials like fuel to fund the vaccination. 55 percent believed that imposing a one-time tax of 1 percent on the net-worth of India"s richest 1000 families was the best mode of funding.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">- 89 percent of people said that the operational hours of vaccination centres should be expanded beyond 9 AM-5 PM.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">- 95 percent of people from all age categories felt that vaccination must be brought closer to the elderly, persons with disabilities and informal sector workers by making use of mobile vans, vaccination camps and home-based vaccination.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">- 88 percent believed that the government must ensure that marginalized groups such as street dwellers, migrant workers, immigrants, refugees and asylum seekers are given access to<br /> vaccination without having to furnish documentation.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">- Improve information about vaccination. 74 percent of respondents earned less than INR 10,000 per month and over 60 percent of respondents from marginalized and minority communities felt that the government has failed in informing them about how and when to get vaccinated. Eight in 10 felt that the government had been changing its COVID-19 vaccine policies too frequently.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">- 89 percent of people said that the government must do more to ramp vaccine production, especially through public sector companies.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">- The experiences of vaccination show the</p> <p style="text-align:justify">-- Challenges with vaccination:</p> <p style="text-align:justify">---29 percent said that they either had to make multiple visits to the vaccination centre or stand in long queues.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">---22 percent faced issues in booking the slot online or had to try for multiple days ahead to get a slot</p> <p style="text-align:justify">---9 percent people said that they had to lose a day's wages to get themselves vaccinated.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">-- Reason for not getting vaccinated:</p> <p style="text-align:justify">---43 percent respondents stated that they could not get vaccinated because the vaccination centre had run out of vaccines when they visited the centre.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">---12 percent did not get vaccinated because they could not afford the high prices of vaccines.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The lessons from the COVID-19 vaccination drive, would not only help to improve the current response but can derive learnings improving equitable administration of any vaccine in future.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">-All vaccination should continue to be done completely free of cost through the government system; avoid the use of private hospitals to deliver vaccination;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">-Proactively release timely information on vaccination strategies, modalities and accomplishments in disaggregated, user-friendly and open source formats;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">-Prioritise allocation, distribution and administration of vaccines for marginalized, poor, vulnerable, excluded communities first, of course along with for those who are at risk;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">-Maintain record and release disaggregated data on vaccination coverage based on social and economic groups including Dalits(Scheduled Caste), Adivasis(Scheduled Tribes), Muslims, and Persons with Disabilities (PwD);<br /> <br /> -Bring vaccination closer to the vulnerable and extend operational hours of vaccination centres beyond 9 AM-5 PM to allow for vaccination without a loss of wages;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">-Improve information dissemination about vaccination; existing technology-based mechanisms for disseminating information about vaccination centres locations and availability of vaccines is not sufficient. It would be important to build robust and functional grievance redressal mechanisms, from national to local, to address emerging challenges. Adequate flexibility must be given to local health administrations to adapt to local circumstances;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">-Further ramp up vaccine production, especially through the use of public sector companies.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The report titled [inside]'COVID-19 Third Wave Preparedness: Children’s Vulnerability and Recovery' (released on 2nd August, 2021)[/inside] is the outcome of a two-part series of online consultative meetings hosted by National Institute of Disaster Management (NIDM, Delhi). These working group consultative meetings largely included stakeholders from diverse backgrounds -- Central Government, State Governments, Civil Society Organisations (CSOs), social workers, humanitarians, academicians, scientists and researchers. Drawing lessons from the first and second waves, through the deliberations by leading experts during these meetings, the NIDM has been able to produce in the form of final outcome, recommendations for the preparedness of the third wave on the issues related to children and women and their well-being. Kindly <a href="/upload/files/NIDM%20report.pdf">click here</a> to access the report.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The consultative meetings held by NIDM with various stakeholders strongly recommended: a home care model, ramping up of vaccination especially for parents, nurses and other front-line workers, immediate recruitment of healthcare staffs and medical facilities for children, guarantee food security especially for the vulnerable amongst vulnerable, strengthen the community level engagement and risk awareness and communication, zero tolerance towards sexual abuse of children and women and raising awareness through a massive public outreach campaign. There is a huge gap between urban and rural India in terms of awareness, digitisation and medical facilities. It seems like the pandemic outbreak has only exacerbated social inequities and highlighted shortcomings of our society. Hence, the government must prioritise rural India and vulnerable groups in order to cope with the ongoing pandemic. This special report also outlines the women-children complementarity, suggesting that a child’s inclusive growth largely depends on that of the mother.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">---</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> The <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/Inequality%20Report%202021%20Indias%20Unequal%20Healthcare%20Story.pdf">report</a> titled Inequality Report 2021: India's Unequal Healthcare Story examines the status of inequality across various indicators of health among different sections of the population from 2005-06 to 2015-16. The report analyses the government interventions made in terms of health programmes and its impact on health inequality. It also includes ground experiences of people, particularly the marginalised groups, during the pandemic.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The key findings of the [inside]Oxfam India's Inequality Report 2021: India's Unequal Healthcare Story (released on 19th July, 2021)[/inside] are as follows (please <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/Inequality%20Report%202021%20Indias%20Unequal%20Healthcare%20Story.pdf">click here</a> to access): </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Growing socio-economic inequalities in India are disproportionately affecting health outcomes of marginalised groups due to the absence of Universal Health Coverage (UHC), reveals Oxfam <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/Inequality%20Report%202021%20Indias%20Unequal%20Healthcare%20Story.pdf">India’s Inequality Report</a> <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/Inequality%20Report%202021%20Indias%20Unequal%20Healthcare%20Story.pdf">2021: India’s Unequal Healthcare Story</a>.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The new <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/Inequality%20Report%202021%20Indias%20Unequal%20Healthcare%20Story.pdf">report</a> by Oxfam India provides a comprehensive analysis of the health outcomes across different socioeconomic groups to gauge the level of health inequality that persists in the country. The report shows the general category performs better than Scheduled Castes-SCs and Scheduled Tribes-STs; Hindus perform better than Muslims; the rich perform better than the poor; men are better off than women; and the urban population is better off than the rural population on various health indicators. The COVID-19 pandemic has further exacerbated these inequalities.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The public healthcare system in India with its weak and understaffed infrastructure has been overburdened with the consistently rising cases. Private healthcare providers, on the other hand, were charging exorbitant prices, preventing the middle-class and the poor from getting diagnosed and treated until the government intervened to cap their prices. Even then, private healthcare has remained inaccessible to the poor while the rich have easily availed its services. As such, the poor and the vulnerable have mostly been dependent on the overburdened public healthcare facilities — with insufficient number of beds and inadequate human resources — for treatment or have gone without being diagnosed and treated.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Health inequalities are linked to and reflect socio-economic inequalities. Often times, it is the socio-economically marginalised communities that suffer from ill-health the most. The ongoing pandemic has revealed that the health systems in most countries are under-prepared to cope with any major health emergency and its unequal impact on the have and the have-nots.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Over the last few decades, India has made great progress in healthcare provisioning. Yet, progressively, the trend has been towards supporting the growth of the private sector in healthcare. This growth has only exacerbated the existing inequalities leaving the poor and the marginalised with no viable healthcare provisions. High costs of health services and lack of quality leads to further impoverishment of the disadvantaged.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The private health sector provided only 5-10 percent of total patient care when India gained independence. Today, it accounts for 66 percent of hospitalization and non-hospitalization cases and 33 percent of institutional births. This growth has been boosted by government concessions and has attracted domestic and foreign companies to set up tertiary care and super speciality hospitals. Within the country, the private formal sector has a distinct customer base. They are the urban-rich. Dehury et al. writes that private hospitals ‘cater to a pool of patient community having health insurance, corporate tie-ups and referrals from general physicians. Usually, the paying capacity of these patients [are] higher than the common Indian citizen…these hospitals cater to the Indian elite class and organized sector workers having all financial protection.’</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The private sector is geared towards profits whereas the public provisioning of health services ensures that the poor and the marginalised have equal access to quality healthcare services closer to home. India’s public health provisioning has, however, been weak. The public expenditure on health by the central government as a percentage of GDP was a mere 0.32 percent in 2019-20.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The combined expenditure by state and central government was about 1.16 percent of the GDP in 2019, rising marginally by 0.02 percent from 2018 — falling far behind the goal of making health expenditure 2.5 percent of the GDP. The per capita health expenditure is highest in Arunachal Pradesh at INR 9,854 and lowest in Bihar at INR 697. In the 2021-22 budget, the health ministry has been allocated a total of INR 76,901 crore, a decline of 9.8 percent from the revised estimates of 2020-21 at INR 85,250 crore. </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Public funds for health has also been invested specifically in secondary and tertiary care rather than in the provisioning of primary healthcare. </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The public sector has prioritized secondary and tertiary care over primary care. Yet, experts acknowledge that primary care is the cornerstone of achieving equitable delivery and access to quality healthcare by all. While focus has been put on achieving Universal Healthcare in India; the government has selectively adopted the insurance model as a way to universalise healthcare instead of enhancing the primary health care system. As such, access to good quality public healthcare has remained fragmented and India is still far away from achieving universal coverage. The rich can avail healthcare from high-end private providers but the poor are stuck with a difficult choice. They either have to incur debts by availing health care from private providers or depend on a poor public healthcare system.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The Planning Commission in 2011 had observed that expenditure in secondary and tertiary care was drawing away attention from primary health services. Research studies substantiate this position and it is argued that ‘[s]ubstantial proportions of the health budgets have been spent on…high-end tertiary medical services — all of which largely benefits the middle classes and detracts from the provision of public health services.’ Studies have also attributed India’s high disease burden to the government’s exclusive focus on the urban-oriented curative medical model. The government’s focus on ‘a heavily medicalized and hightech curative medical interventions’ has derailed the goal to make quality and affordable public healthcare accessible to all irrespective of their ability to pay. The result has been a widening of health inequalities along caste, class, gender and geography.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• To make the goals of National Health Mission (NRHM and National Urban Health Mission were subsumed under the NHM in 2013) a reality, there needs to be a strong public health infrastructure in place, even in hard-to-reach areas. Sufficient medical supplies, equipment, drugs and trained medical staff in health centres should be the standard. On the contrary, public health centres remain understaffed with limited supplies.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Among other things, the Inequality Report 2021 on health has recommended the government to increase health spending to 2.5 percent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) to ensure a more equitable health system in the country; ensure that union budgetary allocation in health for SCs and STs is proportionate to their population; prioritize primary health by ensuring that two-thirds of the health budget is allocated for strengthening primary healthcare; state governments to allocate their expenditure on health to 2.5 percent of Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP); the centre should extend financial support to the states with low per capita health expenditure to reduce inter-state inequality in health. It has asked to widen the ambit of insurance schemes to include out-patient care. The major expenditures on health happen through out-patient costs as consultations, diagnostic tests, medicines, etc. While the report does not endorse Government-financed Health Insurance Schemes (GFHIS) as a way to achieve UHC and stresses that insurance can only be a component of it, it is imperative that GFHIS widens its ambit to include outpatient costs as a way to reduce out-of-pocket expenditure (OOPE).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The Constitution of India does not guarantee a fundamental right to health though it does refer to the role of the government in the provisioning of healthcare to all its citizens. Therefore, the right to health should be enacted as a fundamental right that makes it obligatory for the government to ensure equal access to timely, acceptable, and affordable healthcare of appropriate quality, and address the underlying determinants of health to close the gap in health outcomes between the rich and poor.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• With the lockdown aimed at checking the spread of COVID-19, health systems prioritized services related only to COVID-19. Human and material resources like hospitals, beds and intensive care units were diverted towards the management and treatment of COVID-19 patients. Health services catering to non-Covid illnesses were halted, leading to unprecedented hardships and sufferings for chronic patients and those requiring immediate medical intervention such as pregnant women. Accessibility to non-Covid medical services were grimmer for patients in rural and hard-to-reach areas as compared to urban areas due to the unavailability of health centres in the vicinity and the lack of transportation facilities.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Disruptions in the availability of drugs for non-communicable diseases (NCD), tuberculosis (TB), contraceptive and other essential services were also reported. Telemedicine — the practice of caring for patients remotely — for which guidelines were issued by the Government of India in March 2020 to facilitate access to medical advice made consultations easier. However, for those with no smart phones and internet connectivity, particularly in rural and hard-to-reach areas, seeking medical advice remained a difficult task. The immunization drive was also disrupted. India vaccinates around 20 million children every year and its disruption might add to the largest number of unimmunized children in the world. </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The National Health Profile in 2017 recorded one government allopathic doctor for every 10,189 people and one state-run hospital for every 90,343 people. India also ranks the lowest in the number of hospital beds per thousand population among the BRICS nations — Russia scores the highest (7.12), followed by China (4.3), South Africa (2.3), Brazil (2.1) and India (0.5). India also ranks lower than some of the lesser developed countries such as Bangladesh (0.87), Chile (2.11) and Mexico (0.98).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The current expenditure on health, by the Centre and the state governments combined, is only about 1.25 percent of GDP which is the lowest among the BRICS countries — Brazil (9.2) has the highest allocation, followed by South Africa (8.1), Russia (5.3) and China (5.0). It is also lower than some of its neighbouring countries such as Bhutan (2.5 percent) and Sri Lanka (1.6 percent). The low priority given to health expenditure is also reflected in the share in total expenditure of the government, which is only 4 percent whereas the global average stands at 11 percent. In Oxfam’s Commitment to Reducing Inequality Report 2020, India ranks 154th in health spending, fifth from the bottom. This poor spending is reflected in the inadequate health resources and infrastructure. Only around 50,069 health and wellness centres (HWCs), which are envisaged to deliver comprehensive primary healthcare (CPHC) closer to homes, are functional. These centres are only 65 percent of the cumulative target for 2020-21. Moreover, in 2019, less than 10 percent of PHCs were funded as per IPHS norms whereas the rest remained underfunded. </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Different studies have proved that low public health expenditure yields worse health outcomes. Studies by Barenberg et al. investigated the impact of public health expenditure on Infant Mortality Rate (IMR) and found a negative relationship between the two. Farahani et al. evaluated the relationship between state-level public health spending of India and individual mortality across all age groups using household-level data from the third National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3) showing that a 10 percent increase in public spending on health decreases mortality by about 2 percent, with effects mainly concentrated on women, the young, and the elderly.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The out-of-pocket health expenditure of 64.2 percent in India is higher than the world average of 18.2 percent. Exorbitant prices of healthcare has forced many to sell household assets and incur debts.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The global average for life expectancy is 72.6 years but India (69.42) remains below the global average. It is also lower than the neighbouring countries Nepal (70.8), Bhutan (71.8), Bangladesh (72.6), and Sri Lanka (77) and its BRICS counterparts Brazil (75.9), China (76.9), and Russia (72.6).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• A comprehensive provisioning of public health as water, sanitation and primary healthcare is the most efficient and cost-effective way to achieve UHC around the world.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Evidence from Thailand and Sri Lanka, which have performed better than India with regard to universal access to healthcare, shows that these countries have a high public provisioning of services. Also, evidence from developed countries like Germany, Sweden, Canada and developing countries like Costa Rica reveal that successful insurance-based healthcare system was attained with high levels of public spending and government provisioning of healthcare services.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The Oxfam India <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/Inequality%20Report%202021%20Indias%20Unequal%20Healthcare%20Story.pdf">report</a> says that ‘Kerala invested in infrastructure to create a multi-layered health system, designed to provide first-contact access for basic services at the community level and expanded integrated primary healthcare coverage to achieve access to a range of preventive and curative services…[,] expanded the number of medical facilities, hospital beds, and doctors…[and] public health and social development initiatives… aided in creating the environment for a strong and effective primary care system.’</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="/upload/files/SOPonCOVID19Containment%26ManagementinPeriurbanRural%26tribalareas.pdf">click here</a> to access the [inside]Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) on COVID-19 Containment and Management in Peri-urban, Rural and Tribal areas[/inside] dated 16th May, 2021. The SOP was issued by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>---</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">The key findings of the report titled [inside]Rural Health Statistics 2019-20 (released in April 2021)[/inside], which has been prepared by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, are as follows (please <a href="/upload/files/Rural%20Health%20Statistics%202019-20%20report%20MoHFW%20latest%20available%282%29.pdf">click here</a> to access):</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• As on 31st March, 2020, there were 1,55,404 and 2,517 Sub Centres (SCs), 24,918 and 5,895 Primary Health Centres (PHCs) and 5,183 and 466 Community Health Centres (CHCs), respectively, which were functioning in rural and urban areas of the country.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The average rural population covered by a Sub Centre was 5,729 as on 1st July, 2020, whereas the norm is that one Sub Centre should be serving a population of size in the range 300-5,000.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The average population in tribal/ hilly/ desert areas covered by a Sub Centre was 3,381 as on 1st July, 2020, whereas the norm is that one Sub Centre should be serving a population of size up to 3,000 in such areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• A Sub Centre is the most peripheral and first contact point between the primary health care system and the community. Sub Centres are assigned tasks relating to interpersonal communication in order to bring about behavioral change and provide services in relation to maternal and child health, family welfare, nutrition, immunisation, diarrhoea control and control of communicable diseases programmes. Each Sub Centre is required to be manned by at least one auxiliary nurse midwife (ANM) / female health worker and one male health worker. Under the National Rural Health Mission (NRHM), there is a provision for one additional second ANM on contract basis. One lady health visitor (LHV) is entrusted with the task of supervision of six Sub Centres. The Government of India bears the salary of ANM and LHV while the salary of the Male Health Worker is borne by the state governments.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The average rural population covered by a Primary Health Centre (PHC) was 35,730 as on 1st July, 2020, whereas the norm is that one Primary Health Centre should be serving a population of size in the range 20,000-30,000.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The average population in tribal/ hilly/ desert areas covered by a PHC was 23,930 as on 1st July, 2020, whereas the norm is that one PHC should be serving a population of size up to 20,000 in such areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• PHC is the first contact point between the village community and the medical officer. The PHCs were envisaged to provide an integrated curative and preventive health care to the rural population with emphasis on preventive and promotive aspects of health care. The PHCs are established and maintained by the state governments under the Minimum Needs Programme (MNP)/ Basic Minimum Services (BMS) Programme. As per minimum requirement, a PHC is to be manned by a medical officer supported by 14 paramedical and other staff. Under NRHM, there is a provision for two additional staff nurses at PHCs on contract basis. It acts as a referral unit for 6 Sub Centres and has 4-6 beds for patients. The activities of PHC involve curative, preventive, promotive and family welfare services.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The average rural population covered by a Community Health Centre was 1,71,779 as on 1st July, 2020, whereas the norm is that one Community Health Centre should be serving a population of size in the range 80,000-1,20,000.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The average population in tribal/ hilly/ desert areas covered by a CHC was 97,178 as on 1st July, 2020, whereas the norm is that one CHC should be serving a population of size up to 80,000 in such areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• CHCs are being established and maintained by the state government under Minimum Needs Program (MNP)/Basic Minimum Services (BMS) programme. As per minimum norms, a CHC is required to be manned by four medical specialists i.e. surgeon, physician, gynecologist and pediatrician supported by 21 paramedical and other staff. It has 30 indoor beds with one OT, X-ray, labour room and laboratory facilities. It serves as a referral centre for 4 PHCs and also provides facilities for obstetric care and specialist consultations.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em>Rural Health Care System in India</em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Out of the sanctioned posts, a significant percentage of posts were vacant at all the levels. Nearly 14.1 percent of the sanctioned posts of Health Worker (Female)/ ANM (at SCs +PHCs) were vacant as compared to 37 percent vacancies of Health Worker (Male) in 2020. At PHCs, 37.6 percent of the sanctioned posts of Health Assistant (Male + Female) and 24.1 percent of the sanctioned posts of Doctors were vacant in 2020.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The availability of manpower is one of the important prerequisites for the efficient functioning of the Rural Health services. As on 31st March, 2020, the overall shortfall (which excludes the existing surplus in some of the states) in the posts of Health Worker (Female) / ANM was 2 percent of the total requirement as per the norm of one HW(F)/ ANM per Sub Centre and PHC. The overall shortfall was mainly due to the shortfall in states of Gujarat (1073), Himachal Pradesh (992), Rajasthan (657), Tripura (389) and Kerala (277). Similarly, in case of Health Worker (Male), there was a shortfall of 65.5 percent of the requirement.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• PHC is the first contact point between the village community and the Medical Officer. Manpower in PHC includes a Medical Officer supported by paramedical and other staff. In the case of PHC, for Health Assistant (male + female), the shortfall was 71.9 percent. For allopathic doctors at PHC, there was a shortfall of 6.8 percent of the total requirement at all India level. This shortfall happened due to a significant shortfall of doctors at PHCs in the states of Odisha (461), Chhattisgarh (404), Rajasthan (249), Madhya Pradesh (134), Uttar Pradesh (121) and Karnataka (105).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The Community Health Centres provide specialised medical care of Surgeons, Obstetricians & Gynecologists, Physicians and Pediatricians. The latest available position of specialists manpower at CHCs as on 31st March, 2020 shows that out of the sanctioned posts, 68.4 percent of Surgeons, 56.1 percent of Obstetricians & Gynecologists, 66.8 percent of physicians and 63.1 percent of pediatricians were vacant. Overall 63.3 percent of the sanctioned posts of specialists at CHCs were vacant. Moreover, as compared to requirements for existing infrastructure, there was a shortfall of 78.9 percent of Surgeons, 69.7 percent of Obstetricians & Gynecologists, 78.2 percent of Physicians and 78.2 percent of Pediatricians. Overall, there was a shortfall of 76.1 percent of specialists at the CHCs as compared to the requirement for existing CHCs. The shortfall of specialists was significantly high in most of the states. However, in addition to the specialists, about 15,342 General Duty Medical Officers (GDMOs) Allopathic and 702 AYUSH Specialists along with 2,720 GDMO AYUSH were also available at CHCs as on 31st March, 2020. In addition to this, there were 890 Anaesthetists and 301 Eye Surgeons available at CHCs as on 31st March, 2020.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Comparison of the manpower position of major categories in 2020 with that in 2019 shows an overall decrease in the number of ANMs at SCs & PHCs and Doctors at PHCs during the period. However, there was an increase in the number of Specialists at CHCs. The number of Specialists at CHCs had increased from 3,881 in 2019 to 4,857 in 2020, which was an increase of 27.7 percent.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Considering the status of paramedical staff, there was an increase of Lab Technicians from 18,715 in 2019 to 19,903 in 2020 at PHCs and CHCs. There was a marginal decrease in the number of pharmacists from 26,204 in 2019 to 25,792 in 2020. A significant decrease was also observed in nursing staff under PHC & CHCs from 80,976 in 2019 to 71,847 in 2020. The number of radiographers had increased marginally from 2,419 in 2019 to 2,434 in 2020.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• A total of 1,193 Sub Divisional/ Sub District Hospitals were functioning as on 31st March, 2020 throughout the country. In these hospitals, 13,399 doctors were available. In addition to these doctors, about 29,937 paramedical staff were also available at those hospitals as on 31st March, 2020. The number of doctors in Sub Divisional/ Sub District Hospitals had reduced from 13,750 in 2019 to 13,399 in 2020. The number of paramedical staff in Sub Divisional/ Sub District Hospitals fell from 36,909 in 2019 to 29,937 in 2020.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• In addition to above, 810 District Hospitals (DHs) were also functioning as on 31st March, 2020 throughout the country. There were 22,827 doctors available in the DHs. In addition to the doctors, about 80,920 paramedical staff were also available at District Hospitals as on 31st March, 2020. The number of doctors in District Hospitals went down from 24,676 in 2019 to 22,827 in 2020. The number of paramedical staff in District Hospitals fell from 85,194 in 2019 to 80,920 in 2020.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• As per the Health & Wellness Centre (HWC) portal data, there were a total of 38,595 HWCs functional in India as on 31st March 2020. In total, 18,610 SCs had been converted into HWC-SCs. Also at the level of PHC, a total of 19,985 PHCs had been converted into HWC-PHCs. Out of 19,985 HWC-PHCs, 16,635 PHCs had been converted into HWCs in rural areas and 3,350 in urban areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">**page**</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">Kindly <a href="/upload/files/LASI_India_Factsheet.pdf">click here</a> to access the [inside]India Fact Sheet of Longitudinal Ageing Study in India (LASI) -- Wave-1 (released in 2021)[/inside], An Investigation of Health, Economic, and Social Well-being of India’s Growing Elderly Population, India Report 2020, prepared by International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), National Programme for Health Care Elderly (NPHCE), Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health (HSPH), University of Southern California (USC) and Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MoHFW).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="/upload/files/LASI_India_Executive_Summary.pdf">click here</a> to read the [inside]Executive Summary of Longitudinal Ageing Study in India (LASI) -- Wave-1 (released in 2021)[/inside].</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>---</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to the report entitled [inside]A Neglected Tragedy: The global burden of stillbirths -- Report of the UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation, 2020 (released in October 2020)[/inside] (please click <a href="https://www.im4change.org/upload/files/UN-IGME-the-global-burden-of-stillbirths-2020.pdf">here</a> to access):</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• About one stillbirth occurs every 16 seconds, which means that every year, about 2 million babies are stillborn i.e. showing no signs of life at birth. It means every day, almost 5,400 babies are stillborn. Globally, one in 72 babies is stillborn.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• In the past two decades, 48 million babies were stillborn. Three-in-four stillbirths occur in sub-Saharan Africa or Southern Asia. Low and lower-middle income countries account for 84 percent of all stillbirths but only 62 percent of all live births.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Stillbirths are largely absent in worldwide data tracking, rendering the true extent of the problem hidden. They are invisible in policies and programmes and underfinanced as an area requiring intervention. Targets specific to stillbirths were absent from the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and are still missing in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• There are a variety of reasons behind the slow reduction in stillbirth rates: absence of or poor quality of care during pregnancy and birth; lack of investment in preventative interventions and the health workforce; inadequate social recognition of stillbirths as a burden on families; measurement challenges and major data gaps; absence of global and national leadership; and no established global targets, such as the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Globally, an estimated 42 percent of all stillbirths are intrapartum (i.e., the baby died during labour); almost all of these 832,000 stillborn deaths that occurred in 2019 could have been prevented with access to high-quality care during childbirth, including ongoing intrapartum monitoring and timely intervention in case of complications.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Around 20 million babies are projected to be stillborn in the next decade, if trends observed between 2000 and 2019 in reducing the stillbirth rate continue. Among the 20 million, 2.9 million stillbirths could be prevented by accelerating progress to meet the ENAP target in the 56 countries at risk to miss the goal. Every Newborn Action Plan (ENAP) calls for each country to achieve a rate of 12 stillbirths or fewer per 1,000 total births by 2030 and to close equity gaps.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• In the first two decades of this century (i.e. 2000-2019), the annual rate of reduction (ARR) in the stillbirth rate was just -2.3 percent, compared to a -2.9 percent reduction in neonatal mortality and -4.3 percent among children aged 1–59 months. Meanwhile, between 2000 and 2017, maternal mortality decreased by -2.9 percent.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• In the year 2000, the ratio of the number of stillbirths to the number of under-five deaths was 0.30; by 2019, it had increased to 0.38. So, stillbirths are an increasingly critical global health problem.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• National stillbirth rates around the globe ranged from 1.4 to 32.2 stillbirths per 1,000 total births in 2019. Sub-Saharan Africa, followed by Southern Asia, had the highest stillbirth rate and the greatest number of stillbirths.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Six countries bore the burden of half of all stillbirths of the world – India, Pakistan, Nigeria, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, China and Ethiopia, in order of burden (highest to lowest).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Nearly 3,40,622 of the 19,66,000 stillbirths globally in 2019 were in India, making it the country with the largest such burden (i.e. 17.33 percent).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• In 2019, India, Pakistan and Nigeria alone accounted for one-third of the total burden of stillbirths and 27 percent of live births.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Stillbirth rate is defined as the ratio of the number of still births per 1,000 live births and stillbirths taken together (i.e. total births).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Some progress has been made in preventing stillbirths. Globally, the stillbirth rate declined by 35 percent since 2000. Since 2000, the stillbirth rate declined by 44 percent in Central and Southern Asia, 53 percent in India, 52 percent in Kazakhstan and 44 percent in Nepal.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Among the lower-middle income countries, stillbirth rate fell by 39 percent since 2000. Since the year 2000, stillbirth rate in lower-middle income countries like Mongolia, India and El Salvador declined by 57 percent, 53 percent and 50 percent, respectively.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• A total of 14 countries – including three low- and lower middle income countries (Cambodia, India, Mongolia) – slashed the stillbirth rate by more than half during 2000-2019.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The top 15 countries with the greatest percentage decline in the stillbirth rate during 2000–2019 are China (63 percent), Turkey (63 percent), Georgia (62 percent), North Macedonia (62 percent), Belarus (60 percent), Mongolia (57 percent), Netherlands (55 percent), Azerbaijan (53 percent), Estonia (53 percent), India (53 percent), Kazakhstan (52 percent), Romania (52 percent), El Salvador (50 percent), Peru (48 percent) and Latvia (46 percent).<br /> <br /> • India's stillbirth rate (i.e. (stillbirths per 1,000 total births) in 2000 was 29.6, in 2010 was 20.2 and in 2019 was 13.9. The percentage decline in India's stillbirth rate during 2000–2019 was -53.0 percent. The annual rate of reduction (ARR) in stillbirth rate during 2000-2019 was -4.0 percent.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The total number of stillbirths in India was 852,386 in 2000, 535,683 in 2010 and 340,622 in 2019. The percentage decline in stillbirths during 2000–2019 was -60.0 percent. The annual rate of reduction (ARR) in total number of stillbirths during 2000–2019 was -4.8 percent. India witnessed 24,116,000 livebirths and 24,457,000 total births in 2019. </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Women in sub-Saharan Africa and Southern Asia bear the greatest burden of stillbirths in the world. More than three quarters of estimated stillbirths in 2019 occurred in these two regions, with 42 percent of the global total in sub-Saharan Africa and 34 percent in Southern Asia.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• In 2019, stillbirth rate per 1,000 total births in Afghanistan was 28.4 (total stillbirth in 2019: 35,384), Bangladesh was 24.3 (total stillbirth in 2019: 72,508), Bhutan was 9.7 (total stillbirth in 2019: 127), China was 5.5 (total stillbirth in 2019: 92,170), India was 13.9 (total stillbirth in 2019: 340,622), Maldives was 5.8 (total stillbirth in 2019: 41), Myanmar was 14.1 (total stillbirth in 2019: 13,493), Nepal was 17.5 (total stillbirth in 2019: 9,997), Pakistan was 30.6 (total stillbirth in 2019: 190,483) and Sri Lanka was 5.8 (total stillbirth in 2019: 1,943).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Data are essential to understanding the burden of stillbirths and identifying where, when and why they occur.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Immediate actions are needed to strengthen data systems and their ability to collect, analyses and use timely, quality and disaggregated stillbirth data. To improve stillbirth data availability and quality, it is recommended that countries and relevant stakeholders:</p> <p style="text-align:justify">a. Align the stillbirth definition and measures with international standards<br /> b. Integrate stillbirth-specific components within relevant plans for data system strengthening and improvement<br /> c. Record stillbirth outcomes in all relevant maternal and newborn health programs, including routine HMIS (registers and monthly reporting forms)<br /> d. Provide training and support to include stillbirths within civil and vital registration systems as the coverage of these systems increases<br /> e. Include information on timing of stillbirth (antepartum or intrapartum) in all settings and record causes and contributing factors to stillbirth where possible<br /> f. Report and review stillbirth data locally – at facility or district level – alongside data on neonatal deaths (by day of death) to reduce incentives for misreporting of outcomes, and to monitor potential misclassification.<br /> g. Collate reported stillbirth rate data up the data system to a national level to enable tracking of progress towards the ENAP target of 12 stillbirths or fewer per 1,000 total births in every country by 2030 and to enable monitoring of geographical inequities.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Ending preventable stillbirths is among the core goals of the UN’s Global Strategy for Women’s, Children’s and Adolescents’ Health (2016–2030) and the Every Newborn Action Plan (ENAP). These global initiatives aim to reduce the stillbirth rate to 12 or fewer third trimester (late) stillbirths per 1,000 total births in every country by 2030.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The stillbirth rate (SBR) is defined as the number of babies born with no signs of life at 28 weeks or more of gestation, per 1,000 total births. The stillbirth rate is calculated as: SBR = 1000 * {sb/(sb+lb)}, where 'sb' refers to the number of stillbirths ≥ 28 weeks or more of gestational age; and 'lb' refers to the number of live births regardless of gestational age or birthweight.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> <strong><em>[Shivangini Piplani, who is doing her MA in Finance and Investment (1st year) from Berlin School of Business and Innovation, assisted the Inclusive Media for Change team in preparing the summary of 'A Neglected Tragedy: The global burden of stillbirths -- Report of the UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation, 2020.' She did this work as part of her winter internship at the Inclusive Media for Change project in December 2020.]</em></strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> The Sample Registration System (SRS) is carried out by the Office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner, India with the goal of providing accurate annual estimates of birth rates, death rates, child mortality rates and many other indices of pregnancy and fertility and mortality. The SRS has been providing data for the estimation of various mortality measures since its inception. The report provides mortality indices at the national and state levels, as well as death rates at the sub-state, viz. NSS Natural Division Level. </p> <p style="text-align:justify">The key findings of [inside]Sample Registration System Statistical Report 2018 (released in June 2020)[/inside], published by the Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, are as follows (please <a href="/upload/files/SRS_Statistical_Report_2018.pdf"><span style="background-color:#ffffff">click here</span></a> to access):</p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Crude Death Rate (CDR)</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Crude Death Rate (CDR), which is defined as the number of deaths in a year per thousand population, at the national level, stood at 6.2 in 2018. It was 6.7 in rural areas and 5.1 in urban areas. For all bigger states/ UTs, except West Bengal, the CDR in rural areas was higher than that in urban areas. For West Bengal, CDR in rural (CDR 5.6) and urban (CDR 5.7) areas were almost identical, which makes the state the closest to the Line of Equity vis-à-vis other states/ UTs.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• States that exhibited large differences between urban CDR and rural CDR in 2018 were: Telangana (3 points), Punjab (2.6), Tamil Nadu (2.5), Andhra Pradesh (2.4), Karnataka (2.4), Chhattisgarh (2.3 points) and Himachal Pradesh (2.3). The difference is calculated as Rural CDR - Urban CDR = Difference in CDRs.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The top 5 states with the highest CDRs in 2018 were: Chhattisgarh (8.0), Odisha (7.3), Kerala (6.9), Himachal Pradesh (6.9) and Andhra Pradesh (6.7).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Between the periods 2006-08 and 2016-18, the average CDR at the national level changed by –14.9 percentage points. Between the above-said time points, CDR declined for all states, except Kerala, which showed an increase of 6 percentage points possibly due to the changes in age structure of its population.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Infant Mortality Rate (IMR)</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Infant Mortality Rate (IMR) is defined as the number of infant (less than one year of age) deaths per one thousand live births during the year.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• IMR has seen a substantial decline over the years, from 129 per 1000 live births in 1971 to 110 in 1981 and from 80 in 1991 to 32 in 2018.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• At the national level, IMR was 36.8 in rural areas and 22.9 in urban areas during the period 2016-18. However, IMR was 36 in rural areas and 23 in urban areas in 2018.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• In 2018, Kerala had the lowest IMR of 7 and Madhya Pradesh had the highest IMR of 48.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• In 2018, at the national level, IMR among male infants stood at 32, while that for female infants it was 33.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• For the year 2018, in all states except Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Delhi, Gujarat, Haryana, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Odisha, Punjab, Tamil Nadu, Telangana and Uttarakhand, female infants experienced a higher mortality rate as compared to male infants.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• In 2018, Jharkhand had the highest difference between male IMR (27) and female IMR (34), followed by Bihar with a large difference between male IMR (30) and female IMR (35). As opposed to that, in Madhya Pradesh male IMR (51) exceeded female IMR (46).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• In 2018, Assam witnessed the highest inequity between rural and urban IMRs with its rural IMR at 44 and urban IMR at 20. States like West Bengal (Urban IMR 20, Rural IMR 22), Punjab (Urban IMR 19, Rural IMR 21), Uttarakhand (Urban IMR 29, Rural IMR 31) and Bihar (Urban IMR 30, Rural IMR 32) had the least inequity between rural and urban IMR.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Between 2006-08 and 2016-18, the average IMR declined by -40.3 percent. In rural areas, decline in IMR between the above-said time points ranged from -63.9 percentage points in Delhi to -32.2 percentage points in Chhattisgarh. The highest fall in IMR in urban areas between the above-said time points was noticed in Delhi i.e. -56.4 percent.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Neonatal Mortality Rate</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Neo-natal Mortality Rate (NMR) is defined as the number of infant (less than 29 days) deaths per one thousand live births during the year.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• In 2018, at the national level, NMR was 23, while in rural and urban areas, they were 27 and 14, respectively.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• In 2018, NMR was the lowest in Kerala at 5 and highest in Madhya Pradesh at 35.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• At the national level, the percentage of neo-natal deaths to total infant deaths was 71.7 percent in 2018, and it was 60.1 percent in urban areas and 74.4 percent in rural areas. It means that most infants die when they are not even 30 days old.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Perinatal Mortality Rate</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Peri-natal mortality rate (PMR) is defined as the number of still births and infant deaths of less than 7 days per 1,000 live births (LB) and still births (SB) taken together during the year.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• At the national level, PMR has been estimated to be 22 in 2018. It was 25 in rural areas and 14 in urban areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• In 2018, Madhya Pradesh had the highest PMR at 30 and Kerala had the lowest PMR at 10.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Still Birth Rate</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Still Birth Rate (SBR) is defined as the ratio of the number of still births per one thousand live births and still births taken together.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• At the national level, the SBR has been estimated to be 4 in 2018.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• In 2018, the highest SBR has been estimated for Odisha (10) and lowest have been estimated for Jammu and Kashmir and Jharkhand (i.e. 1 each).</p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Under-five Mortality Rate (U5MR)</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Under-five Mortality Rate (U5MR) is the probability of dying between birth and exactly age 5, expressed per 1,000 live births.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• At the national level, U5MR has been estimated to be 36 in 2018. In urban areas, the U5MR in 2018 has been estimated to be 26 while in rural areas, it has been estimated to be 40.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Estimated U5MR was the lowest in Kerala at 10 and was the highest in Madhya Pradesh at 56.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• At the national level, female U5MR (37) was higher than the male U5MR (36) in 2018.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• In 2018, female U5MRs were higher than that of male U5MR in all states except in Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Delhi, Gujarat, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Odisha, Punjab, Tamil Nadu and Uttarakhand.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Age-Specific Mortality Rates (ASMR)</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Age-specific Mortality Rate (ASMR), is defined as the number of deaths in a particular age-group per thousand population of the same age-group during the year.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong><em>5-14 Age Group</em></strong><br /> <br /> • At the national level, the ASDR for the 5-14 age group has been estimated to be 0.5 in 2018.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• In 2018, the lowest ASDR for the 5-14 age group was found for Kerala and Assam (0.2 each) and the highest ASDR for the 5-14 age group was observed in case of Bihar, Odisha, Madhya and Chhattisgarh (0.7 each).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• At the national level, although ASDR for the 5-14 age group was the same for males and females in urban areas (0.4 each), ASDR for the 5-14 age group among females was 0.6 and among males was 0.5 in rural areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong><em>15-59 Age Group</em></strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">• At the national level, ASDR for the 15-59 age group has been estimated to be 3.2 in rural areas and 2.3 in urban areas. At the national level, the ASDR for the 15-59 age group was 2.9 in 2018.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• In 2018, the female ASDR for the 15-59 age group was lower than that of male ASDR for the 15-59 age group in all the states.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong><em>60 and Above Age Group</em></strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">• At the national level, ASDR for the 60 and above age group has been estimated to be 42.6.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• ASDR for the 60 and above age group among males (45.9) was greater than that among females (39.5). The same trend existed for rural and urban areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• ASDR for the 60 and above age group has been estimated to be the highest in Chhattisgarh (58.9) and lowest in Delhi (28.3).</p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Sex Ratio at Birth (SRB)</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Sex Ratio at Birth (SRB) is defined as the number of female births per 1000 male births during the year.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The 3 years’ average of SRB (in the period 2016-18) has been estimated to be 899. At the national level, it was 900 in rural areas and 897 in urban areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• For 2016-18, the average SRB was the highest in Chhattisgarh at 958 and it was the lowest in Uttarakhand at 840.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• In rural areas, Chhattisgarh had the highest SRB of 976 and Haryana had the lowest SRB of 840 in the period 2016-18. </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• In urban areas, Madhya Pradesh had the highest SRB of 968 and Uttarakhand had the lowest SRB at 810 in the period 2016-18.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong><em>[Meghana Myadam and Sakhi Arun Jagdale, who are doing their MA in Development Studies (1st year) from Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Hyderabad, assisted the Inclusive Media for Change team in preparing the summary of the report by the Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner<em>.</em> They did this work as part of their summer internship at the Inclusive Media for Change project in July 2020.]</em></strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="/upload/files/FAQ.pdf">click here</a> to access the [inside]FAQ on COVID-19 prepared by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare[/inside].</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="/upload/files/Containment%20Plan%20for%20Large%20Outbreaks%20of%20COVID19%20Final.pdf">click here</a> to access the [inside]Containment Plan for Large Outbreaks Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019[/inside] (COVID-19), which has been prepared by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">---</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/Background-Paper-COVID19.pdf">click here</a> to read the [inside]Background Note on COVID-19[/inside], which was prepared by Jan Swasthya Abhiyan (JSA) and All India People’s Science Network(AIPSN), dated 16th March, 2020.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/Statement-COVID19.pdf">click here</a> to read the [inside]Statement on the COVID-19 pandemic[/inside], which was released by Jan Swasthya Abhiyan (JSA) and All India People’s Science Network(AIPSN) on 16th March, 2020.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">---</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/High%20Level%20group%20of%20Health%20Sector.pdf" title="High Level group of Health Sector">click here</a> to access the Report of the [inside]High Level Group on Health Sector (2019), submitted to the Fifteenth Finance Commission of India[/inside]. The members of the High Level Group on Health were Dr. Randeep Guleria, Dr. Devi Shetty, Dr. Dileep Govind Mhaisekar, Dr. Naresh Trehan, Dr. Bhabatosh Biswas and Prof. K Srinath Reddy. </p> <p style="text-align:justify">---</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Press%20Note%20NSS%2075th%20Round%20Report%20Key%20Indicators%20of%20Social%20Consumption%20in%20India%20Health%20July%202017%20to%20June%202018%20released%20on%2023rd%20November%202019.pdf" title="Press Note NSS 75th Round Report Key Indicators of Social Consumption in India Health July 2017 to June 2018 released on 23rd November 2019">click here</a> to access the major findings of [inside]NSS 75th Round Report: Key Indicators of Social Consumption in India: Health, July 2017 to June 2018 (released on 23rd November 2019)[/inside].<br /> <br /> Kindly <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Key%20Indicators%20of%20Social%20Consumption%20in%20India%20Health.pdf" title="Key Indicators of Social Consumption in India Health">click here</a> to access the NSS 75th Round Report: Key Indicators of Social Consumption in India: Health, July 2017 to June 2018 (released on 23rd November 2019).</p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <div style="text-align:justify">The key findings of the [inside]2019 India TB report (released in September 2019)[/inside], which has been produced by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, are as follows (please <a href="https://tbcindia.gov.in/WriteReadData/India%20TB%20Report%202019.pdf">click here</a> and <a href="https://tbcindia.gov.in/index1.php?lang=1&level=1&sublinkid=4160&lid=2807">click here</a> to access):</div> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> • The country accounted for a quarter of the global tuberculosis (TB) burden with an estimated 27 lakh cases in 2018.<br /> <br /> • In 2018, the country was able to achieve a total notification of 21.5 lakh TB cases, of which 25 percent was from private sector. Majority of the TB burden is among the working age group. Nearly 89 percent of TB cases came from the age group 15-69 years. About two-third of the TB patients were males.<br /> <br /> • Among the notified, treatment was initiated for about 19.1 lakh cases (almost 90 percent), across both public and private sectors.<br /> <br /> • HIV co-infection among TB patient was nearly fifty thousand cases amounting to TB-HIV co-infection rate of 3.4 percent.<br /> <br /> • In 2018, TB notification has increased to 5.37 lakhs. This is an increase by 35 percent in notification from private sector in comparison to 2017.<br /> <br /> • Based on private drug sales data, it could be said that in 2016 there was about 1.59 times patients in the private sector as compared to the public sector (approximately 22.7 lakh patients in total).<br /> <br /> • In India about 80 percent of the outpatient care is provided by private health care providers. Considering the quantum of private sector, it necessitates to leverage their capacity to expand health coverage.<br /> <br /> • TB is a notifiable disease vide 2012 as per declaration of Government of India Order. This has expanded the ambit of TB surveillance covering all public as well as private health facilities. The healthcare providers shall notify every TB cases to local authorities such as District Health Officers/ Chief Medical Officers of a district and Municipal Health Officer of a municipal corporation. This notification should be done every month. The surveillance begins with the notification, and completed with acting on the information gathered. In <a href="tinymce/uploaded/TB%20notification%20Gazette%20of%20India%20dated%2019%20March%202018.pdf" title="TB notification Gazette of India dated 19 March 2018">March 2018</a>, the notification was published in Gazette of India, making it mandatory for private providers to notify TB patients and public health system to act upon it.<br /> <br /> • Uttar Pradesh, with 17 percent of population of the country, is the largest contributor to TB cases, with 20 percent of the total notifications, accounting for about 4.2 lakh cases (187 cases per lakh population).<br /> <br /> • Delhi and Chandigarh stand apart from all other states and UTs with regard to notification rates relative to their resident population. Annual notification rates in Delhi and Chandigarh were 504 cases per lakh population and 496 cases per lakh population, respectively. This is because patients residing in other parts of the country are diagnosed/ notified from these two UTs.<br /> <br /> • In 2018, the Revised National Tuberculosis Control Programme (RNTCP) notified 21.5 lakh TB cases, a 16 percent increase over 2017.<br /> <br /> • The largest ever National Drug Resistance Survey in the world for 13 anti-TB drugs has been completed and it has indicated about 6.2 percent prevalence of drug resistant TB in the country among all TB patients.<br /> <br /> • The Government of India is prioritising resource allocations for TB in the country with more than Rs. 12,000 crores being invested in the implementation of the National Strategic Plan to End TB 2017-2025. The government has started the Nikshay Poshan Yojana (NPY) for nutritional support to TB patients. <br /> <br /> • It is expected that the country would be able to cover all TB cases through the online notification system -- NIKSHAY.<br /> </p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify">The ending preventable maternal mortality (EPMM) target for reducing the global maternal mortality ratio (MMRatio) by 2030 was adopted as Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) target 3.1: reduce global MMRatio to less than 70 per lakh live births by 2030. Having targets for mortality reduction is important, but accurate measurement of maternal mortality remains challenging and many deaths still go uncounted. Many countries still lack well-functioning civil registration and vital statistics (CRVS) systems, and where such systems do exist, reporting errors – whether incompleteness (unregistered deaths, also known as “missing”) or misclassification of cause of death – continue to pose a major challenge to data accuracy. The report entitled 'Trends in Maternal Mortality 2000 to 2017: Estimates by World Health Orgnization (WHO), United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF), World Bank Group, United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) and the United Nations Population Division presents internationally comparable global, regional and country-level estimates and trends for maternal mortality between 2000 and 2017.<br /> <br /> The new estimates presented in this report supersede all previously published estimates for years that fall within the same time period. Care should be taken to use only these estimates for the interpretation of trends in maternal mortality from 2000 to 2017; due to modifications in methodology and data availability, differences between these and previous estimates should not be interpreted as representing time trends. In addition, when interpreting changes in MMRatios over time, one should take into consideration that it is easier to reduce the MMRatio when the level is high than when the MMRatio level is already low.<br /> <br /> Please note that Maternal Mortality Ratio is the number of women who die from pregnancy-related causes while pregnant or within 42 days of pregnancy termination per 100,000 live births.<br /> <br /> The key findings of the report entitled [inside]Trends in Maternal Mortality 2000 to 2017: Estimates by WHO, UNICEF, World Bank Group, UNFPA and the United Nations Population Division (released in September 2019)[/inside] are as follows (please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Maternal%20mortality%20Levels%20and%20trends%202000%20to%202017%20Executive%20Summary.pdf" title="Maternal mortality Levels and trends 2000 to 2017 Executive Summary">click here</a> and <a href="https://www.unfpa.org/featured-publication/trends-maternal-mortality-2000-2017">click here</a> to access): <br /> <br /> • Nigeria and India had the highest estimated numbers of maternal deaths, accounting for approximately one-third (35 percent) of estimated global maternal deaths in 2017, with approximately 67,000 and 35,000 maternal deaths (23 percent and 12 percent of global maternal deaths), respectively.<br /> <br /> • Maternal Mortality Ratio for India was 370 in 2000, 286 in 2005, 210 in 2010, 158 in 2015 and 145 in 2017. So, the MMRatio for the country reduced by almost 61 percent between 2000 and 2017.<br /> <br /> • MMRatio for China was 59 in 2000, 44 in 2005, 36 in 2010, 30 in 2015 and 29 in 2017. Hence, the MMRatio for China reduced by around 51 percent between 2000 and 2017. <br /> <br /> • The absolute difference in MMRatio between India and China has lessened from 311 in 2000 to 116 in 2017. The country's MMRatio was 6.3 times that of China in 2000, which has reduced to 5 times in 2017.<br /> <br /> • MMRatio for Bangladesh was 434 in 2000, 343 in 2005, 258 in 2010, 200 in 2015 and 173 in 2017. Therefore, the MMRatio for Bangladesh decreased by nearly 60 percent between 2000 and 2017. <br /> <br /> • The absolute gap in MMRatio between Bangladesh and India has reduced from 64 in 2000 to 28 in 2017.<br /> <br /> • MMRatio for Sri Lanka was 56 in 2000, 45 in 2005, 38 in 2010, 36 in 2015 and 36 in 2017. So, the MMRatio for Sri Lanka reduced by roughly 36 percent between 2000 and 2017. <br /> <br /> • MMRatio for Pakistan was 286 in 2000, 237 in 2005, 191 in 2010, 154 in 2015 and 140 in 2017. Therefore, the MMRatio for Pakistan declined by roughly 51 percent between 2000 and 2017. </p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• MMRatio for South Asia was 395 in 2000, 309 in 2005, 235 in 2010, 179 in 2015 and 163 in 2017. Hence, the MMRatio for South Asia reduced by around 59 percent between 2000 and 2017. </p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Sub-Saharan Africa and Southern Asia accounted for approximately 86 percent (2,54,000) of the estimated global maternal deaths in 2017 with sub-Saharan Africa alone accounting for roughly 66 percent (1,96,000), while Southern Asia accounted for nearly 20 percent (58,000). South-Eastern Asia, in addition, accounted for over 5 percent of global maternal deaths (16,000).<br /> </p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to the [inside]National Health Profile 2018, 13th Issue[/inside], Central Bureau of Health Intelligence, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare (please <a href="https://im4change.org/docs/900National%20Health%20Profile%202018%2013th%20Issue%20Central%20Bureau%20of%20Health%20Intelligence%20Ministry%20of%20Health%20&%20Family%20Welfare.pdf">click here</a> to access):<br /> <br /> <strong>Demographic Indicators</strong><br /> <br /> • The Infant Mortality Rate (IMR) per 1,000 live births has declined considerably from 74 infant deaths in 1994 to 34 infant deaths in 2016. There is a huge gap between IMR in rural areas (38 infant deaths per 1,000 live births) and urban areas (23 infant deaths per 1000 live births).<br /> <br /> • Among the states, the lowest IMR per 1,000 live births in 2016 was found in Goa (8), followed by Kerala (10) and Manipur (11). The highest IMR per 1,000 live births in 2015 was found in Madhya Pradesh (47), followed by both Assam and Odisha (44 each).</p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The life expectancy of life at birth has increased from 49.7 years in 1970-75 to 68.3 years in 2011-15. In the period 2011-15, the life expectancy for females was 70.0 years and 66.9 years for males.<br /> <br /> • In the period 2011-15, the life expectancy in the rural areas was 67.1 years and in the urban areas it was 71.9 years.<br /> <br /> • The Maternal Mortality Ratio (MMRatio) per 1,00,000 livebirths has decreased from 178 maternal deaths during 2010-12 to 167 maternal deaths during 2011-13. In 2011-13, the MMRatio per 1,00,000 livebirths was the highest in Assam i.e. 300 maternal deaths and lowest in Kerala i.e. 61 maternal deaths.<br /> <br /> • The country's birth rate per 1,000 estimated mid-year population has fallen from 29.5 livebirths in 1991 to 20.4 livebirths in 2016. Birth rate per 1,000 estimated mid-year population in rural areas was 22.1 livebirths and in urban areas it was 17.0 livebirths in 2016.<br /> <br /> • India's natural growth rate per 1,000 mid-year population has declined from 19.7 in 1991 to 14.0 in 2016.<br /> <br /> • The proportion of urban population to India's total population has increased from 25.7 percent in 1991 to 27.81 percent in 2001, and further increased to 31.14 in 2011.<br /> <br /> • The country's population density has increased from 267 persons per square kilometer in 1991 to 325 persons per square kilometer in 2001, and further rose to 382 persons per square kilometer in 2011.<br /> <br /> • The decadal growth rate of India's population has fallen from 23.87 percent in 1981-1991 to 21.54 percent in 1991-2001, and further declined to 17.7 percent in 2001-2011.<br /> <br /> <strong>Health Status Indicators</strong><br /> <br /> • In 2017, maximum number of malaria cases was reported in Odisha (3,52,140 cases) and maximum number of deaths was reported in West Bengal (29 deaths).<br /> <br /> • The total number of cases of malaria has changed from 8,81,730 in 2013 to 8,42,095 in 2017. The total number of deaths due to malaria has changed from 440 in 2013 to 104 in 2017.<br /> <br /> • Out of the overall cases of Kala-azar reported in 2017, 72 percent of the cases were reported in Bihar. The total number of cases of Kala-azar has fallen from 13,869 in 2013 to 5,758 in 2017. Likewise, the total number of deaths from Kala-azar has fallen from 20 in 2013 to zero in 2017.<br /> <br /> • There has been a considerable fall in the number of swine flu cases/ deaths in the year 2014 (viz. 937) as compared with 2012 (viz. 5,044) & 2013 (viz. 5,253). However, the number of cases (42,592) and deaths (2,990) have drastically increased in the year 2015. In 2016, the cases decreased to 1786 and again increased to 38,811 in 2017.<br /> <br /> • A total of 63,679 cases of chikungunya were reported in 2017 as compared with 64,057 cases in 2016. Most chikungunya cases in 2017 were reported from Karnataka (32,170), followed by Gujarat (7,807) and Maharashtra (7,639).<br /> <br /> • The total number of cases and deaths due to chicken pox were 74,035 and 92, respectively in 2017. Kerala accounted for maximum number of cases (30,941) and West Bengal accounted for maximum number of deaths (53) due to chicken pox in 2017. <br /> <br /> • The total number of cases of Acute Encephalitis Syndrome has increased from 7,825 in 2013 to 13,036 in 2017. The total number of deaths due to Acute Encephalitis Syndrome has decreased from 1,273 in 2013 to 1,010 in 2017. Uttar Pradesh reported maximum numbers of cases (4,749) and maximum number of deaths (593) in 2017.<br /> <br /> • The total number of cases of Japanese Encephalitis has almost doubled from 1,086 in 2013 to 2,180 in 2017. The total number of deaths due to Japanese Encephalitis has increased from 202 in 2013 to 252 in 2017. Uttar Pradesh reported maximum numbers of cases (693) and maximum number of deaths (93) in 2017.<br /> <br /> • The total number of cases and deaths due to encephalitis were 12,485 and 626, respectively in 2017. Assam accounted for maximum number of cases (5,525) and Uttar Pradesh accounted for maximum number of deaths (246) due to chicken pox in 2017.<br /> <br /> • The total number of cases and deaths due to viral meningitis were 7,559 and 121, respectively in 2017. Andhra Pradesh accounted for maximum number of cases (1,493) and maximum number of deaths (33) due to viral meningitis in 2017.<br /> <br /> • The total number of cases of dengue has almost doubled from 75,808 in 2013 to 1,57,996 in 2017. The total number of deaths due to dengue has increased from 193 in 2013 to 253 in 2017. Tamil Nadu reported maximum numbers of cases (23,294) and maximum number of deaths (65) in 2017.<br /> <br /> • As per the National Programme for Prevention and Control of Cancer, Diabetes, Cardiovascular Diseases and Stroke (NPCDCS), out of 3,57,23,660 patients who attended non-communicable disease (NCD) clinics in 2017, 8.41 percent people are diagnosed with diabetes, 10.22 percent are diagnosed with hypertension (high blood pressure), 0.37% are diagnosed with cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), 0.13 percent are diagnosed with stroke and 0.11 percent are diagnosed with common cancers (including oral, cervical and breast cancer).<br /> <br /> • During the year 2015, the lives of 4,13,457 and 1,33,623 people are cut short as a result of accidental and suicide cases, respectively. Many more people suffer non-fatal injuries, with many incurring a disability as a result of their injury.<br /> <br /> • Suicide rates are increasing significantly for young adults including male, female & transgender in a wider population. The maximum number of suicide cases (44,593) is reported between the age-group 30-45 years. <br /> <br /> • The total number of disabled persons in India is 26,814,994 as per the Census 2011.<br /> <br /> • The total number of cases and deaths due to snake bite were 1,42,366 and 948 respectively in 2017.<br /> <br /> <strong>Health Financing in India</strong><br /> <br /> • The total public expenditure on health for the year 2015-16 stood at Rs 1.4 lakh crores (actual).<br /> <br /> • The per capita public expenditure (actual) on health in nominal terms has gone up from Rs. 621 in 2009-10 to Rs. 1,112 in 2015-16.<br /> <br /> • Public expenditure on health (includes health sector expenditure by Centre and States/UTs) as a percentage of GDP was 1.02 percent in 2015-16. There is no significant change in public expenditure on health as a percentage of GDP since 2009-10.<br /> <br /> • The Centre-State share in total public expenditure on health was 31:69 in 2015-16, which used to be 36:64 in 2009-10.<br /> <br /> • The total public expenditure on health (excluding other Central Ministries) in 2015-16 was Rs. 1,40,054 crores, with Medical and Public Health comprising the major share (78.7 percent). The share of Family Welfare was 12.6 percent.<br /> <br /> • Urban and rural health services constituted 71 percent of the public expenditure on medical and public health in 2015-16.<br /> <br /> • The North-Eastern states had the highest (viz. Rs. 2,878 per capita) and Empowered Action Group (EAG) states (including Assam) had the lowest (viz. Rs. 871 per capita) average per capita public expenditure on health in 2015-16 (excluding UTs). For example, in Mizoram the per capita health expenditure was Rs. 5862 (actual) in 2015-16. However, in Bihar, the per capita health expenditure was Rs. 491 (actual) in 2015-16.<br /> <br /> • The North-Eastern states had the highest public health expenditure as a percentage of Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP) in 2015-16 (2.76 percent). Public health expenditure as a percentage of GSDP stood at 1.36 percent for EAG states (including Assam) and 0.76 percent for major non-EAG states.<br /> <br /> • Based on the Health Survey (71st round) conducted by National Sample Service Office (NSSO), the average medical expenditure incurred during stay at hospital between January, 2013 and June, 2014 was Rs. 14,935 for rural and Rs. 24,436 for urban India.<br /> <br /> • The average total medical expenditure per child birth as in-patient over the last 365 days (survey conducted from January to June 2014) in a public hospital in rural areas was Rs. 1,587 and in urban areas is Rs. 2,117.<br /> <br /> • Around 43 crore individuals were covered under any health insurance in the year 2016-17. This amounts to 34 percent of the total population of India. Almost 79 percent of them were covered by public insurance companies. <br /> <br /> • Overall, 77 percent of all persons covered with insurance fall under Government-sponsored schemes.<br /> <br /> • Public insurance companies had a higher share of coverage and premium for all types of health insurance policies, except family floater policies including individual policies.<br /> <br /> • Compared to countries that have either Universal Health Coverage or moving towards it, India’s per capita public spending on health is low.<br /> <br /> <strong>Human Resources in Health Sector</strong><br /> <br /> • The number of registered allopathic doctors possessing recognized medical qualifications (under Indian Medical Council Act) and registered with state medical council for the years 2016 and 2017 were 25,282 and 17,982, respectively. Upto 2017, the total number of doctors possessing recognised medical qualifications (under the IMC Act) registered with the State Medical Councils/ Medical Council of India is 10,41,395. <br /> <br /> • In 2017, the average population served per government allopathic doctor was 11,082. The state having the highest average population served per government allopathic doctor in 2017 was Bihar (28,391), followed by Uttar Pradesh (19,962) and Jharkhand (18,518). <br /> <br /> • In 2017, the average population served per government dental surgeon was 1,76,004. The state having the highest average population served per government dental surgeon in 2017 was Chhattisgarh (25,87,900), followed by Maharashtra (14,83,150) and Uttar Pradesh (11,41,869).<br /> <br /> • The number of dental surgeon registered with Central/ State Dental Councils of India has increased from 93,332 in 2008 to 2,51,207 as on 31st December, 2017.<br /> <br /> • Over the years with gaining popularity, there is a steady rise in total number of registered AYUSH doctors in India from 7,71,468 in 2016 to 7,73,668 in 2017.<br /> <br /> • There was a total of 8,41,279 Auxilliary Nurse Midwives (ANMs) serving in the country as on 31st December, 2016.<br /> <br /> • As on 31st December, 2016, the highest number of registered ANMs among the states were found in Andhra Pradesh (1,38,435), followed by Rajasthan (1,08,688) and Odisha (62,159).<br /> <br /> • There are 19,80,536 Registered Nurses and Registered Midwives (RN & RM) and 56,367 Lady Health Visitors (LHV) serving in the country as on 31st December, 2016.<br /> <br /> • As on 31st December, 2016, the highest number of registered RN & RM among the states were found in Tamil Nadu (2,62,718), followed by Kerala (2,46,161) and Andhra Pradesh (2,32,621).<br /> <br /> • As on 13th November, 2017, the total number of registered pharmacists operating in the country is 9,07,132.<br /> <br /> • As on 13th November, 2017, the highest number of registered pharmacists among the states were found in Maharashtra (2,03,089), followed by Gujarat (1,19,445) and Andhra Pradesh (1,15,754).<br /> <br /> • In rural areas, the total number of allopathic doctors at primary health centres (PHCs) was 27,124 as on 31st March, 2017.<br /> <br /> • As on 31st March, 2017, among the states, the highest number of allopathic doctors at PHCs was found in Maharashtra (2,929), followed by Tamil Nadu (2,759) and Rajasthan (2,382).<br /> <br /> • In rural areas, the total number of specialists at community health centres (CHCs) is 4,156 as on 31st March, 2017.<br /> <br /> • As on 31st March, 2017, among the states, the highest number of specialists at CHCs is found in Maharashtra (508), followed by Karnataka (498) and Rajasthan (497).<br /> <br /> <strong>Health Infrastructure</strong><br /> <br /> • Medical education infrastructures in the country have shown rapid growth during the last 26 years. The country has 476 medical colleges, 313 dental colleges for Bachelor of Dental Surgery (BDS) & 249 dental colleges for Master of Dental Surgery (MDS). There has been a total admission of 52,646 in 476 Medical Colleges and 27,060 in BDS and 6,233 in MDS during 2017-18.<br /> <br /> • The total number of dental colleges for BDS has increased from 77 in 1994-95 to 313 in 2017-18 viz. by 4.1 times. The total number of dental colleges for MDS has increased from 32 in 1994-95 to 249 in 2017-18 viz. by 7.8 times.<br /> <br /> • The total number of admission in dental colleges for BDS has risen from 1,987 in 1994-95 to 27,060 in 2017-18 viz. by 13.6 times. The total number of admission in dental colleges for MDS has risen from 225 in 1994-95 to 6,233 in 2017-18 viz. 27.7 times.<br /> <br /> • The total number of medical colleges in India has increased from 146 in 1991-92 to 476 in 2017-18 viz. by 3.3 times.<br /> <br /> • The total number of male students taking admissions in medical colleges has gone up from 7,468 in 1991-92 to 26,082 in 2017-18 viz. by 3.5 times. The total number of female students taking admissions in medical colleges has gone up from 4,731 in 1991-92 to 26,564 in 2017-18 viz. by 5.6 times.<br /> <br /> • India has 3,215 institutions producing 1,29,926 General Nurse Midwives annually and 777 colleges for Pharmacy (Diploma) with an intake capacity of 46,795 as on 31st October, 2017.<br /> <br /> • There are 23,582 government hospitals having 7,10,761 beds in the country. It means that there is just one bed for 1,826 Indians in government hospitals, assuming that the projected population in 2018 being 129,80,41,000 as on 1st March, 2018.<br /> <br /> • Around 19,810 government hospitals are in rural areas with 2,79,588 beds and 3,772 government hospitals are in urban areas with 4,31,173 beds.<br /> <br /> • As on 31st March, 2017, there were 1,56,231 sub-centres, 25,650 primary health centres (PHCs) and 5,624 community health centres (CHCs).<br /> <br /> • As on 31st March, 2017, most sub-centres were found in Uttar Pradesh (20,521), followed by Rajasthan (14,406) and Maharashtra (10,580). <br /> <br /> • As on 31st March, 2017, most PHCs were found in Uttar Pradesh (3,621), followed by Karnataka (2,359) and Rajasthan (2,079). <br /> <br /> • As on 31st March, 2017, most CHCs were found in Uttar Pradesh (822), followed by Rajasthan (579) and Tamil Nadu (385).<br /> <br /> • Medical care facilities under AYUSH by management status i.e. dispensaries & hospitals were 27,698 and 3,943 respectively, as on 1st April, 2017.<br /> <br /> • The total number of licensed blood banks in the country till June, 2017 was 2,903. The highest number of blood banks are found in Maharashtra (328), followed by Uttar Pradesh (294) and Tamil Nadu (291). <br /> <br /> • In total, there were 469 eye banks (362 privately run and 107 government run) in the country as on 4th January, 2018. Most eye banks were found in Maharashtra (166), followed by Karnataka (39) and Madhya Pradesh (36).<br /> <br /> <strong>Achievement of health-related SDGs targets</strong><br /> <br /> • On most targets pertaining to health-related Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), India lags behind the target. For example, although the target for coverage of essential health services is 100 percent (indicator no. 3.8.1), in our country only 57 percent of the population is covered by such services. Similarly, although the target for Maternal Mortality Ratio (per 1,00,000 live births) is 70 by 2030 (indicator no. 3.1.1), MMRatio in India presently is 174.<br /> <br /> • The target for Under-five mortality rate (per 1000 live births) is 25 by 2030 (indicator no. 3.2.1). However, U5MR in the country is 47.7.<br /> <br /> • In case of many SDG-related indicators such as Suicide mortality rate (per 100,000 population) (indicator no. 3.4.2) or say Adolescent birth rate (per 1000 women aged 15-19 years) (indicator no. 3.7.2), the SDG target is yet to be determined.<br /> <br /> • For many SDG-related indicators such as Hepatitis B incidence (indicator no. 3.3.4) or say Proportion of the population with access to affordable medicines and vaccines on a sustainable basis (indicator no. 3.b.1), the data for India is either not provided or remain unavailable.<br /> <br /> <strong>Table: Current Status of Health-related Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Target - Indian Scenario</strong><br /> <br /> <img alt="SDGs" src="tinymce/uploaded/SDGs_1.jpg" style="height:242px; width:334px" /><br /> <br /> <em><strong>Source:</strong> Monitoring Health in the Sustainable Development Goals: 2017, World Health Organization, Regional Office for South East Asia, as quoted in the National Health Profile 2018, please <a href="https://bit.ly/2MmfuuK">click here</a> to access, page no. 288<br /> <br /> Report of the Inter-Agency and Expert Group on Sustainable Development Goal Indicators (E/CN.3/2016/2/Rev.1), please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Final%20list%20of%20SDG%20indicators.pdf">click here</a> to access </em><br /> <br /> <br /> </p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">While state-level trends for some important health indicators have been available in India, a comprehensive assessment of the diseases causing the most premature deaths and disability in each state, the risk factors responsible for this burden, and their time trends have not been available in a single standardised framework. The India State-level Disease Burden Initiative was launched in October 2015 to address this crucial knowledge gap with support from the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare of the Government of India. This is a collaborative effort between the Indian Council of Medical Research, Public Health Foundation of India, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, and experts and stakeholders from about 100 institutions across India. The work of this Initiative is overseen by an Advisory Board consisting of eminent policymakers and involves extensive engagement of 14 domain expert groups with the estimation process. Based on intense work over two years, this report describes the distribution and trends of diseases and risk factors for every state of India from 1990 to 2016.<br /> <br /> The estimates were produced as part of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. The analytical methods of this study have been standardised over two decades of scientific work, which has been reported in over 16,000 peer-reviewed publications, making it the most widely used approach globally for disease burden estimation. These methods enable standardised comparisons of health loss caused by different diseases and risk factors, between geographic units, sexes, and age groups, and over time in a unified framework. The key metric used for this comparison is disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), which is the sum of the number of years of life lost due to premature death and a weighted measure of the years lived with disability due to a disease or injury. The use of DALYs to track disease burden is recommended by India’s National Health Policy of 2017.<br /> <br /> It is to be noted that attributable burden is the share of the burden of a disease that can be estimated to occur due to exposure to a particular risk factor.<br /> <br /> According to the report entitled [inside]India: Health of the Nation’s States - The India State-Level Disease Burden Initiative, Disease Burden Trends in the States of India 1990 to 2016 (released in October, 2017) [/inside], prepared by Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), Public Health Foundation of India (PHFI), Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) and Ministry of Health & Family Welfare (MoHFW), please <a href="https://im4change.org/docs/11592India_Health_of.pdf">click here</a> to access:<br /> <br /> <em>Health status improving, but major inequalities between states</em><br /> <br /> • Life expectancy at birth improved in India from 59.7 years in 1990 to 70.3 years in 2016 for females, and from 58.3 years to 66.9 years for males. There were, however, continuing inequalities between states, with a range of 66.8 years in Uttar Pradesh to 78.7 years in Kerala for females, and from 63.6 years in Assam to 73.8 years in Kerala for males in 2016.<br /> <br /> • The per person disease burden measured as DALYs rate dropped by 36 percent from 1990 to 2016 in India, after adjusting for the changes in the population age structure during this period. But there was an almost two-fold difference in this disease burden rate between the states in 2016, with Assam, Uttar Pradesh, and Chhattisgarh having the highest rates, and Kerala and Goa the lowest rates.<br /> <br /> • While the disease burden rate in India has improved since 1990, it was 72 percent higher per person than in Sri Lanka or China in 2016.<br /> <br /> • The under-5 mortality rate has reduced substantially from 1990 in all states, but there was a four-fold difference in this rate between the highest in Assam and Uttar Pradesh as compared with the lowest in Kerala in 2016, highlighting the vast health inequalities between the states.<br /> <br /> <em>Large differences between states in the changing disease profile</em><br /> <br /> • Of the total disease burden in India measured as DALYs, 61 percent was due to communicable, maternal, neonatal, and nutritional diseases (termed infectious and associated diseases in this summary for simplicity) in 1990, which dropped to 33 percent in 2016.<br /> <br /> • There was a corresponding increase in the contribution of non-communicable diseases from 30 percent of the total disease burden in 1990 to 55 percent in 2016, and of injuries from 9 percent to 12 percent.<br /> <br /> • Infectious and associated diseases made up the majority of disease burden in most of the states in 1990, but this was less than half in all states in 2016. However, the year when infectious and associated diseases transitioned to less than half of the total disease burden ranged from 1986 to 2010 for the various state groups in different stages of this transition.<br /> <br /> • The wide variations between the states in this epidemiological transition are reflected in the range of the contribution of major disease groups to the total disease burden in 2016: 48 percent to 75 percent for non-communicable diseases, 14 percent to 43 percent for infectious and associated diseases, and 9 percent to 14 percent for injuries. Kerala, Goa, and Tamil Nadu have the largest dominance of non-communicable diseases and injuries over infectious and associated diseases, whereas this dominance is present but relatively the lowest in Bihar, Jharkhand, Uttar Pradesh, and Rajasthan.<br /> <br /> • It is to be noted that epidemiological transition level (ETL) is based on the ratio of the number of DALYs in a population due to communicable, maternal, neonatal, and nutritional diseases to the number of DALYs due to non-communicable diseases and injuries together. A decreasing ratio indicates advancing epidemiological transition with an increasing relative burden from non-communicable diseases as compared with communicable, maternal, neonatal, and nutritional diseases.<br /> <br /> • The major EAG states of Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh both have a relatively lower level of development indicators and are at a similar less advanced epidemiological transition stage. However, Uttar Pradesh had 50 percent higher disease burden per person from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 54 percent higher burden from tuberculosis, and 30 percent higher burden from diarrhoeal diseases, whereas Madhya Pradesh had 76% higher disease burden per person from stroke. The cardiovascular risks were generally higher in Madhya Pradesh, and the unsafe water and sanitation risk was relatively higher in Uttar Pradesh.<br /> <br /> • The two North-East India states of Manipur and Tripura are both at a lower-middle stage of epidemiological transition but have quite different disease burden rates from specific leading diseases. Tripura had 49% higher per person burden from ischaemic heart disease, 52 percent higher from stroke, 64 percent higher from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 159 percent higher from iron-deficiency anaemia, 59 percent higher from lower respiratory infections, and 56 percent higher from neonatal disorders. Manipur, on the other hand, had 88 percent higher per person burden from tuberculosis and 38 percent higher from road injuries. Regarding the level of risks, child and maternal malnutrition, air pollution, and several of the cardiovascular risks were higher in Tripura.<br /> <br /> • The two adjoining north Indian states of Himachal Pradesh and Punjab both have a relatively higher level of development indicators and are at a similar more advanced epidemiological transition stage. However, there were striking differences between them in the level of burden from specific leading diseases. Punjab had 157 percent higher per person burden from diabetes, 134 percent higher burden from ischaemic heart disease, 49 percent higher burden from stroke, and 56 percent higher burden from road injuries. On the other hand, Himachal Pradesh had 63 percent higher per person burden from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Consistent with these findings, Punjab had substantially higher levels of cardiovascular risks than Himachal Pradesh.<br /> <br /> <em>Rising burden of non-communicable diseases in all states</em><br /> <br /> • The contribution of most of the major non-communicable disease groups to the total disease burden has increased all over India since 1990, including cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, chronic respiratory diseases, mental health and neurological disorders, cancers, musculoskeletal disorders, and chronic kidney disease.<br /> <br /> • Among the leading non-communicable diseases, the largest disease burden or DALY rate increase from 1990 to 2016 was observed for diabetes, at 80 percent, and ischaemic heart disease, at 34 percent. In 2016, three of the five leading individual causes of disease burden in India were non-communicable, with ischaemic heart disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as the top two causes and stroke as the fifth leading cause.<br /> <br /> • The range of disease burden or DALY rate among the states in 2016 was 9 fold for ischaemic heart disease, 4 fold for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and 6 fold for stroke, and 4 fold for diabetes across India. While ischaemic heart disease and diabetes generally had higher DALY rates in states that are at a more advanced epidemiological transition stage toward non-communicable diseases, the DALY rates of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were generally higher in the EAG states that are at a relatively less advanced epidemiological transition stage.<br /> <br /> • The DALY rates of stroke varied across the states without any consistent pattern in relation to the stage of epidemiological transition. This variety of trends of the different major non-communicable diseases indicates that policy and health system interventions to tackle their increasing burden have to be informed by the specific trends in each state.<br /> <br /> <em>Infectious and associated diseases reducing, but still high in many states</em><br /> <br /> • The burden of most infectious and associated diseases reduced in India from 1990 to 2016, but five of the ten individual leading causes of disease burden in India in 2016 still belonged to this group: diarrhoeal diseases, lower respiratory infections, iron-deficiency anaemia, preterm birth complications, and tuberculosis.<br /> <br /> • The burden caused by these conditions generally continues to be much higher in the Empowered Action Group (EAG) and North-East state groups than in the other states, but there were notable variations between the states within these groups as well.<br /> <br /> • One should noted that the Empowered Action Group (EAG) states is a group of eight states that receive special development effort attention from the Government of India, namely, Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Odisha, Rajasthan, Uttarakhand, and Uttar Pradesh.<br /> <br /> • For India as whole, the disease burden or DALY rate for diarrhoeal diseases, iron-deficiency anaemia, and tuberculosis was 2.5 to 3.5 times higher than the average globally for other geographies at a similar level of development, indicating that this burden can be brought down substantially.<br /> <br /> <em>Increasing but variable burden of injuries among states</em><br /> <br /> • The contribution of injuries to the total disease burden has increased in most states since 1990. The highest proportion of disease burden due to injuries is in young adults. Road injuries and self-harm, which includes suicides and non-fatal outcomes of self-harm, are the leading contributors to the injury burden in India.<br /> <br /> • The range of disease burden or DALY rate varied 3 fold for road injuries and 6 fold for self-harm among the states of India in 2016.<br /> <br /> • The burden due to road injuries was much higher in males than in females. The DALY rate for self-harm for India as a whole was 1.8 times higher than the average globally for other geographies at a similar level of development in 2016.<br /> <br /> <em>Rising risks for cardiovascular diseases and diabetes</em><br /> <br /> • Of the total disease burden in India in 1990, a tenth was caused by a group of risks including unhealthy diet, high blood pressure, high blood sugar, high cholesterol, and overweight, which mainly contribute to ischaemic heart disease, stroke, and diabetes. The contribution of this group of risks increased massively to a quarter of the total disease burden in India in 2016.<br /> <br /> • The combination of these risks was highest in Punjab, Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Andhra Pradesh, and Maharashtra in 2016, but importantly, the contribution of these risks has increased in every state of the country since 1990.<br /> <br /> • The other significant contributor to cardiovascular diseases and diabetes, as well as to cancers and some other diseases, is tobacco use, which was responsible for 6% of the total disease burden in India in 2016. All of these risks are generally higher in males than in females.<br /> <br /> <em>Unacceptably high risk of child and maternal malnutrition</em><br /> <br /> • While the disease burden due to child and maternal malnutrition has dropped in India substantially since 1990, this is still the single largest risk factor, responsible for 15% of the total disease burden in India in 2016. This burden is highest in the major EAG states and Assam, and is higher in females than in males.<br /> <br /> • Child and maternal malnutrition contributes to disease burden mainly through increasing the risk of neonatal disorders, nutritional deficiencies, diarrhoeal diseases, lower respiratory infections, and other common infections.<br /> <br /> • As a stark contrast, the disease burden due to child and maternal malnutrition in India was 12 times higher per person than in China in 2016. Kerala had the lowest burden due to this risk among the Indian states, but even this was 2.7 times higher per person than in China.<br /> <br /> <em>Unsafe water and sanitation improving, but not enough yet</em><br /> <br /> • Unsafe water and sanitation was the second leading risk responsible for disease burden in India in 1990, but dropped to the seventh leading risk in 2016, contributing 5 percent of the total disease burden, mainly through diarrhoeal diseases and other infections.<br /> <br /> • Risk factors means potentially modifiable causes of disease and injury.<br /> <br /> • The burden due to this risk is also highest in several EAG states and Assam, and higher in females than in males. The improvement in exposure to this risk from 1990 to 2016 was least in the EAG states, indicating that higher focus is needed in these states for more rapid improvements.<br /> <br /> • The per person disease burden due to unsafe water and sanitation was 40 times higher in India than in China in 2016.<br /> <br /> <em>Household air pollution improving, outdoor air pollution worsening</em><br /> <br /> • The contribution of air pollution to disease burden remained high in India between 1990 and 2016, with levels of exposure among the highest in the world. It causes burden through a mix of non-communicable and infectious diseases, mainly cardiovascular diseases, chronic respiratory diseases, and lower respiratory infections.<br /> <br /> • The burden of household air pollution decreased during the period 1990-2016 due to decreasing use of solid fuels for cooking, and that of outdoor air pollution increased due to a variety of pollutants from power production, industry, vehicles, construction, and waste burning.<br /> <br /> • Household air pollution was responsible for 5 percent of the total disease burden in India in 2016, and outdoor air pollution for 6 percent. The burden due to household air pollution is highest in the EAG states, where its improvement since 1990 has also been the slowest. On the other hand, the burden due to outdoor air pollution is highest in a mix of northern states, including Haryana, Uttar Pradesh, Punjab, Rajasthan, Bihar, and West Bengal.<br /> </p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> The report entitled National Health Accounts: Estimates for India 2014-15 (released in October, 2017) provides healthcare expenditures in India based on National Health Accounts Guidelines for India, 2016 (with refinements where required) that adhere to System of Health Accounts 2011 (SHA 2011), a global standard framework for producing health accounts. The NHA estimates for India is a result of an institutionalised process wherein, the boundaries, data sources, classification codes and estimation methodology have all been standardised in consultation with national and international experts under the guidance of NHA Expert Group for India.<br /> <br /> The NHA provides key indicators to understand financing of health system in the country and allows for comparison with other countries. The National Health Policy 2017 sets out several goals related to healthcare financing and emphasizes the need to track expenditures on health through a robust system of National Health Accounts. The production of annual NHA estimates builds a database for tracking trends in allocations for health by union/state governments and estimate the burden of out-of-pocket payments.<br /> <br /> The key findings of the report entitled [inside]National Health Accounts: Estimates for India 2014-15 (released in October, 2017)[/inside], which has been prepared by the National Health Accounts Technical Secretariat, National Health Systems Resource Centre and Ministry of Health and Family Welfare are as follows (please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/National%20Health%20Accounts%20Estimates%20Report%202014-15.pdf" title="National Health Accounts Estimates for India 2014-15">click here</a> to access):<br /> <br /> • The Total Health Expenditure (THE) for India is estimated at Rs. 4,83,259 crores (3.89 percent of GDP and Rs. 3,826 per capita) for the year 2014-15. THE constitutes current and capital expenditures incurred by Government and Private Sources including External/Donor funds. Current Health Expenditure (CHE) is Rs. 4,51,286 crores (93.4 percent of THE) and capital expenditures is Rs. 31,973 crores (6.6 percent of THE).<br /> <br /> • The Government Health Expenditure (GHE) including capital expenditure is Rs. 1,39,949 crores (29 percent of THE, 1.13 percent GDP and Rs. 1,108 per capita) for the year 2014-15. This amounts to about 3.94 percent of General Government Expenditure in 2014-15. Of the GHE, Union Government share is 37 percent and State Government share is 63 percent. Union Government Expenditure on National Health Mission is Rs. 20,199 crores, Defence Medical Services Rs. 6,695 crores, Railway Health Services is Rs. 2,111 crores, Central Government Health Scheme (CGHS) is Rs. 2,300 crores and Ex Servicemen Contributory Health Scheme (ECHS) is Rs. 2,243 crores.<br /> <br /> • The Out-of-Pocket Expenditure (OOPE) on health by households is Rs. 3,02,425 crores (62.6 percent of THE, 2.4 percent of GDP, Rs. 2,394 per capita) for the year 2014-15. Private Health Insurance expenditure is Rs. 17,755 crores (3.7 percent of THE) for the year 2014-15.<br /> <br /> • Of the Current Health Expenditure, Union Government share is Rs. 37,221 crores (8.2 percent) and the State Government’s share Rs. 59,978 crores (13.3 percent). Local bodies’ share is Rs. 2,960 crores (0.7 percent), Households share (including insurance contributions) about Rs. 3,20,262 crores (71 percent, OOPE being 67 percent). Contribution by enterprises (including insurance contributions) is Rs. 20,069 crores (4.4 percent) and NGOs is Rs. 7,422 crores (1.6 percent). External/donor funding contributes to about Rs. 3,374 crores (0.7 percent).<br /> <br /> • The Current Health Expenditure attributed to Government Hospitals is Rs. 64,685 crores (14.3 percent) and Private Hospitals Rs. 1, 16,943 (25.9 percent). Expenditures incurred on other Government Providers (including PHC, Dispensaries and Family Planning Centres) is Rs. 27,782 crores (6.2 percent), Other Private Providers (incl. private clinics) is Rs. 23,795 crores (5.3 percent), Providers of Patient Transport and Emergency Rescue is Rs. 20,627 crores (4.6 percent), Medical and Diagnostic laboratories is Rs. 21,058 crores (4.7 percent), Pharmacies is Rs. 1,30,451 crores (28.9 percent), Other Retailers is Rs. 559 crores (0.1 percent), Providers of Preventive care is Rs. 23,817 crores (5.3 percent), and Other Providers is Rs. 9,985 crores (2.2 percent). About Rs. 11,584 crores (2.6 percent) is attributed to Providers of Health System Administration and Financing.<br /> <br /> • Current health expenditure attributed to Inpatient Curative Care is Rs. 1,58,334 crores (35.1 percent), Outpatient curative care is Rs. 73,059 crores (16.2 percent), Patient Transportation is Rs. 20,627 crores (4.6 percent), Laboratory and Imaging services is Rs. 21,058 crores (4.7 percent), Prescribed Medicines is Rs. 1,28,887 crores (28.6 percent), Over The Counter (OTC) Medicines is Rs. 1564 crores (0.3 percent), Therapeutic Appliances and Medical Goods is Rs. 559 crores (0.1 percent), Preventive Care is Rs. 30,420 crores (6.7 percent), and others is Rs. 5,194 crores (1.2 percent). About Rs. 11,584 crores (2.6 percent) is attributed to Governance and Health System Administration.<br /> <br /> • Total Pharmaceutical Expenditure is 37.9 percent of CHE (includes prescribed medicines, over the counter drugs and those provided during an inpatient, outpatient or any other event involving a contact with health care provider). The Expenditure on Traditional, Complementary and Alternative Medicine (TCAM) is 16 percent of CHE.<br /> <br /> • The Current Health Expenditure attributed to Primary Care is 45.1 percent, Secondary Care is 35.6 percent, Tertiary care is 15.6 percent and governance and supervision is 2.6 percent. When this is disaggregated; Government expenditure on Primary Care is 51.3 percent, Secondary Care is 21.9 percent and Tertiary Care is 14 percent. Private expenditure on Primary Care is 43.1 percent, Secondary Care is 39.9 percent and Tertiary Care is 16.1 percent.<br /> </p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page** </p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/National%20Health%20Policy%202017.pdf">click here</a> to access the [inside]National Health Policy 2017[/inside].</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> The National Health Profile provides the latest data on all major health sector-related indicators in a comprehensive manner. It gives information on 6 major sectors i.e. Demographic, Socio-economic, Health Status, Health Finance, Health Infrastructure and Human Resources. <br /> <br /> According to the [inside]National Health Profile 2015[/inside], produced by the Central Bureau of Health Intelligence, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, (please <a href="http://www.cbhidghs.nic.in/E-Book%20HTML-2015/index.html">click here</a> to access):<br /> <br /> <strong><em>Demographic indicators</em></strong><br /> <br /> • Infant Mortality Rate has declined considerably (40 per 1000 live births in 2013), however differentials of rural (44) and urban (27) are still high.<br /> <br /> • Maternal Mortality Ratio (per 1 lakh live births) is highest in Assam (300) and lowest in Kerala (61) in 2011-13.<br /> <br /> • The life expectancy at birth has increased from 49.7 years in 1970-75 to 66.1 years in 2006-10. During 2006-10, the life expectancy for females has been 67.7 years and males has been 64.6 years. <br /> <br /> • Among the states, sex ratio is least for Haryana (879) while among the UTs, Daman and Diu (618) lags behind. Kerala (1084) tops the list with maximum sex ratio.<br /> <br /> • The Total Fertility Rate (TFR) for the country has been 2.3 in 2013. In rural areas it has been 2.5, and in urban areas it has been 1.8.<br /> <br /> <strong><em>Socio-economic indicators</em></strong><br /> <br /> • Literacy rate stood at 73 percent in 2011. Literacy rate among females has been 64.6 percent and males has been 80.9 percent. Literacy rate in urban areas (84.1 percent) has been more as compared to the same in rural areas (67.8 percent). Literacy rate has been highest in Kerala (94 percent)<br /> <br /> • The percentage of population below the poverty line (as per Tendulkar methodology) has been 21.9 percent in 2011-12. The percentage of population below the poverty line in rural areas has been 25.7 percent and in urban areas has been 13.7 percent.<br /> <br /> • The per capita Net National Income at current prices increased almost 3 times from Rs. 24,143 in 2004-05 to Rs. 74,920 in 2013-14.<br /> <br /> • The per capita per day net availability of cereals has increased from 386.2 gm in 2001 to 468.9 gm in 2013. Similarly, the per capita per day net availability of pulses has increased from 30 gm in 2001 to 41.9 gm in 2013.<br /> <br /> • Slum population in India is projected to increase from 9.30 crore in 2011 to 10.47 crore in 2017.<br /> <br /> • Of the total 1.34 crore residences in slums, nearly 58.5 percent are in good condition, 37.4 percent are in livable condition and 4.1 percent are in dilapidated condition. <br /> <br /> <strong><em>Health status </em></strong><br /> <br /> • Based on available evidence, cardiovascular disease (24 percent), chronic respiratory disease (11 percent), cancer (6 percent) and diabetes (2 percent) are the leading cause of mortality in India.<br /> <br /> • The total number of dengue cases in India has grown from 28,292 in 2010 to 40,425 in 2014. The total number of dengue related deaths stood at 131 in 2014.<br /> <br /> • The total number of Japanese Encephalitis cases in India has grown from 555 in 2010 to 1,652 in 2014. The total number of Japanese Encephalitis related deaths stood at 292 in 2014.<br /> <br /> • The total number of malaria cases in India has grown from nearly 16 lakh in 2010 to 10.71 lakh in 2014. The total number of malaria related deaths stood at 535 in 2014.<br /> <br /> • The total number of Chikungunya fever cases in India has reduced from 48,176 in 2010 to 15,445 in 2014. <br /> <br /> • Nearly 47 percent of deliveries in India during 2012-13 were institutional whereas 52.3 percent deliveries took place at home. <br /> <br /> • Nearly 40.5 percent of children under 3 years of age were breastfed within an hour of birth in 2012-13. <br /> <br /> • At the national level, nearly 54 percent of children aged 12-23 months received full vaccination during 2012-13.<br /> <br /> • The incidence of infanticide was 82 and foeticide was 210 in 2012.<br /> <br /> <strong><em>Health finance</em></strong><br /> <br /> • Per capita public expenditure on health in nominal terms has gone up from Rs. 621 in 2009-10 to Rs. 1280 in 2014-15.<br /> <br /> • Public expenditure on health as a percentage of GDP has gone up from 1.12 percent in 2009-10 to 1.26 percent in 2014-15.<br /> <br /> • The Centre-state share in total public expenditure on health has changed from 36:64 in 2009-10 to 30:70 in 2014-15.<br /> <br /> • Out-of-pocket (OOP) medical expenditure incurred during 2011-12 has been Rs. 146 per capita per month for urban India and Rs. 95 for rural India.<br /> <br /> • Over 60 percent of total OOP health expenditure is on medicines, both in rural and urban India in 2011-12.<br /> <br /> • As a share of total consumption expenditure, OOP expenditure on health has been 6.7 percent in rural India and 5.5 percent in urban India in 2011-12.<br /> <br /> • Per capita OOP expenditure as well as the share of OOP in total consumption expenditure was positively correlated with consumption expenditure fractiles; higher fractiles had higher levels of both per capita OOP and share of OOP in consumption expenditure in 2011-12.<br /> <br /> • Among all the states, Kerala had the highest per capita OOP medical expenditure as well as its share in total consumption expenditure in 2011-12.<br /> <br /> • Around 22 crore individuals were covered under any health insurance in 2013-14. This means 18 percent of the population has been covered under any health insurance.<br /> <br /> <strong><em>Human resources in health sector</em></strong><br /> <br /> • The total number of doctors possessing recognized medical qualification (under the IMC Act), registered with state medical councils or Medical Council of India, stood at 15,976 in 2014.<br /> <br /> • The total number of dental surgeons registered with the Central/ State Dental Councils of India stood at 1.54 lakhs in 2014, which was 21,720 in 1994.<br /> <br /> • The total number of Government allopathic doctors stood at 1.06 lakhs and the total number of Government dental surgeons stood at 5,614.<br /> <br /> • As on 31 December, 2014, the total number of Auxiliary Nurse Midwives (ANMs) stood at 7.86 lakh, whereas Registered Nurses & Registered Midwives (RN & RM) stood at 17.8 lakhs and Lady Health Visitors (LHV) stood at 55,914.<br /> <br /> • As on 27 June, 2014, the total number of pharmacists stood at 6.64 lakh.<br /> <br /> <strong><em>Health infrastructure</em></strong><br /> <br /> • The total number of licensed blood banks in India as on February 2015 is 2760.<br /> <br /> • There are 20,306 hospitals having 6.76 lakh beds in India. There are 16,816 hospitals in rural areas having 1.84 lakh beds and 3,490 hospitals in urban areas having 4.92 lakh beds.<br /> <br /> • The number of medical colleges in India has more than doubled from 146 in 1991-92 to 398 in 2014-15.<br /> </p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> The 71st round National Sample Survey on “Social Consumption: Health” was conducted during January to June 2014. The information in the survey was collected from 36,480 households in rural areas and 29,452 households in urban areas during the 71st round.<br /> <br /> The key findings of the [inside]71st round NSS report: Key Indicators of Social Consumption in India Health (published in June 2015)[/inside] are as follows (please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/nss_71st_ki_health_30june15.pdf" title="NSS 71st Round Health">click here</a> to access the full report; please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/NSS%20Press%20Release%20Health.pdf" title="NSS Press Note Health">click here</a> to read the summary of findings):<br /> <br /> <em>A. Non-hospitalized treatment</em><br /> <br /> • The Proportion (per 1000) of Ailing Persons (PAP), measured as the number of living persons reporting ailments (per 1000 persons), was 89 persons in rural India and 118 persons in urban India.<br /> <br /> • Inclination towards allopathy treatment was prevalent (around 90% in both the sectors). Only 5 to 7 percent usage of ‘other’ including AYUSH (Ayurveda, Yoga or Naturopathy Unani, Siddha and homoeopathy) was reported both in rural and urban area. Moreover, un-treated spell was higher in rural (both for male and female) than urban areas.<br /> <br /> • Private doctors were the most important single source of treatment in both the sectors (Rural & Urban). More than 70 percent (72 per cent in the rural areas and 79 per cent in the urban areas) spells of ailment were treated in the private sector (consisting of private doctors, nursing homes, private hospitals, charitable institutions, etc.).<br /> <br /> <em>B. Hospitalized treatment</em><br /> <br /> • Medical treatment of an ailing person as an in-patient in any medical institution having provision for treating the sick as in-patients, was considered as hospitalised treatment. In the urban population, 4.4 percent persons were hospitalised at some time during a reference period of 365 days. The proportion of persons hospitalised in the rural areas was lower (3.5 percent).<br /> <br /> • It is observed that in rural India, 42 percent hospitalised treatment was carried out in public hospital and rest 58 percent in private hospital. For the urban India, the corresponding figures were 32 percent and 68 percent. It may be noted in this context that households (or persons within households) were segregated in sector (rural/urban) by their place of domicile, and not by the place of treatment.<br /> <br /> • Preference towards allopathy treatment was observed in cases of hospitalised treatment as well.<br /> <br /> <em>C. Cost of treatment - as in-patient and other</em><br /> <br /> • Average medical expenditure per hospitalisation case: Higher amount was spent for treatment per hospitalised case by people in the private hospitals (Rs. 25850) than in the public hospitals (Rs. 6120). The highest expenditure was recorded for treatment of Cancer (Rs. 56712) followed by that for Cardio-vascular diseases (Rs. 31647).<br /> <br /> • Average medical expenditure per non-hospitalisation case was Rs. 509 in rural India and Rs. 639 in urban India.<br /> <br /> • As much as 86 percent of rural population and 82 percent of urban population were still not covered under any scheme of health expenditure support. Government, however, was able to bring about 12 percent urban and 13 percent rural population under health protection coverage through Rastriya Swasthya Bima Yojana (RSBY) or similar plan. Only 12 percent households of the 5th quintile class (Usual Monthly Per Capita Consumer Expenditure) of urban area had some arrangement of medical insurance from private provider.<br /> <br /> <em>D. Incidence of childbirth, Expenditure on institutional childbirth</em><br /> <br /> • In rural area 9.6% women (age 15-49) were pregnant at any time during the reference period of 365 days; for urban this proportion was 6.8%. Evidence of interrelation of place of childbirth with level of living is noted both in rural and urban areas. In the rural areas, about 20% of the childbirths were at home or any other place other than the hospitals. The same for urban areas was 10.5%. Among the institutional childbirth, 55.5% took place in public hospital and 24% in private hospital in rural area. In urban area, however, the corresponding figures were 42% and 47.5% respectively.<br /> <br /> • An average of Rs. 5544 was spent per childbirth (as inpatient) in rural area and Rs. 11685 in urban area. The rural population spent, on an average, Rs. 1587 for the same in a public sector hospital and Rs. 14778 for one in a private sector hospital. The corresponding figures for urban India were Rs. 2117 and Rs. 20328.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> The key findings of the [inside]Draft National Health Policy 2015 (published in December 2014)[/inside], prepared by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare are as follows (Please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Draft%20National%20Health%20Policy%202015.pdf" title="Draft NHP 2015">click here</a> to download):<br /> <br /> • The draft National Health Policy accepts and endorses the understanding that a full achievement of the goals and principles as defined would require an increased public health expenditure to 4% to 5% of the GDP. However, given that the NHP, 2002 target of 2% was not met, and taking into account the financial capacity of the country to provide this amount and the institutional capacity to utilize the increased funding in an effective manner, the present draft health policy proposes a potentially achievable target of raising public health expenditure to 2.5% of the GDP. It also notes that 40% of this would need to come from Central expenditures. At current prices, a target of 2.5% of GDP translates to Rs. 3800 per capita, representing an almost four fold increase in five years.<br /> <br /> • The private sector today provides nearly 80% of outpatient care and about 60% of inpatient care. (The out-patient estimate would be significantly lower if we included only qualified providers. By NSSO estimates as much as 40% of the private care is likely to be by informal unqualified providers). 72% of all private health care enterprises are own-account-enterprises (OAEs), which are household run businesses providing health services without hiring a worker on a fairly regular basis.<br /> <br /> • In terms of comparative efficiency, public sector is value for money as it accounts (based on the NSSO 60th round) for less than 30% of total expenditure, but provides for about 20% of outpatient care and 40% of in-patient care. This same expenditure also pays for 60% of end-of-life care (RGI estimates on hospital mortality), and almost 100% of preventive and promotive care and a substantial part of medical and nursing education as well.<br /> <br /> • Thailand has almost the same total health expenditure as India but its proportion of public health expenditure is 77.7% of total health expenditures (which is 3.2% of the GDP) and this is spent through a form of strategic purchasing in which about 95% is purchased from public health care facilities- which is what gives it such a high efficiency. Brazil spends 9% of its GDP on health but of this public health expenditure constitutes 4.1% of the GDP (which is 45.7% of total health expenditure). This public health expenditure accounts for almost 75% of all health care provision. It would be ambitious if India could aspire to a public health expenditure of 4% of the GDP, but most expert groups have estimated 2.5% as being more realistic.<br /> <br /> • As costs of care rise, affordability, as distinct from equity, requires emphasis. Health care costs of a household exceeding 10% of its total monthly consumption expenditures or 40% of its non-food consumption expenditure- is designated catastrophic health expenditures- and is declared as an unacceptable level of health care costs.<br /> <br /> • Almost all hospitalization even in public hospitals leads to catastrophic health expenditures, and over 63 million persons are faced with poverty every year due to health care costs alone. It is because there is no financial protection for the vast majority of health care needs. In 2011-12, the share of out-of-pocket expenditure on health care as a proportion of total household monthly per capita expenditure was 6.9% in rural areas and 5.5% in urban areas. This led to an increasing number of households facing catastrophic expenditures due to health costs (18% of all households in 2011-12 as compared to 15% in 2004-05). Under NRHM, free care in public hospitals was extended to a select set of conditions – for maternity, newborn and infant care as part of the Janani Suraksha Yojana and, the Janani Shishu Suraksha Karyakram, and for disease control programmes. For all other services, user fees especially for diagnostics and “outside prescriptions” for drugs continued. Also, due to the selective approach, several essential services especially for chronic illness was not obtainable or at best only available at overcrowded district and medical college hospitals resulting in physical and financial hardship and poor quality of care.<br /> <br /> • The Central Government under the Ministry of Labour & Employment, launched the Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana (RSBY) in 2008. The population coverage under these various schemes increased from almost 55 million people in 2003-04 to about 370 million in 2014 (almost one-fourth of the population). Nearly two thirds (180 million) of this population are those in the Below Poverty Line (BPL) category. Evaluations show that schemes such as the RSBY, have improved utilization of hospital services, especially in private sector and among the poorest 20% of households and SC/ST households. However there are other problems. One problem is low awareness among the beneficiaries about the entitlement and how and when to use the RSBY card. Another is related to denial of services by private hospitals for many categories of illnesses, and over supply of some services.<br /> <br /> • The private health care industry is valued at $40 billion and is projected to grow to $ 280 billion by 2020 as per market sources. The current growth rate of this perennially and most rapidly growing area of the economy, the healthcare industry, at 14% is projected to be 21% in the next decade. Even during the global recession of 2008, this sector remained relatively recession-proof. The private health care industry is complex and differentiated. It includes insurance and equipment, which accounts for about 15%, pharmaceuticals which accounts for over 25%, about 10% on diagnostics and about 50% is hospitals and clinical care. The private sector growth cannot be seen merely as a consequence of limited public sector investment. The Government has had an active policy in the last 25 years of building a positive economic climate for the health care industry. Amongst these measures are lower direct taxes; higher depreciation in medical equipment; Income Tax exemptions for 5 years for rural hospitals; custom duty exemptions for imported equipment that are lifesaving; Income Tax exemption for Health Insurance; and active engagement through publicly financed health insurance which now covers almost 27% of the population.<br /> <br /> • Maternal mortality now accounts for 0.55% of all deaths and 4% of all female deaths in the 15 to 49 year age group.<br /> <br /> • India is set to reach the Millennium Development Goals (MDG) with respect to maternal and child survival. The MDG target for Maternal Mortality Ratio (MMR) is 140 per 100,000 live births. From a baseline of 560 in 1990, the nation had achieved 178 by 2010-12, and at this rate of decline is estimated to reach an MMR of 141 by 2015.<br /> <br /> • In the case of under-5 mortality rate (U5MR), the MDG target is 42. From a baseline of 126 in 1990, in 2012 the nation has an U5MR of 52 and an extrapolation of this rate would bring it to 42 by 2015. This is particularly creditable on a global scale where in 1990 India's MMR and U5MR were 47% and 40% above the international average respectively.<br /> <br /> • Although over 90% of pregnant women receive one antenatal check up and 87% received full TT immunization, only about 68.7% of women have received the mandatory three antenatal check-ups. Again whereas most women had received iron and folic acid tablets, only 31% of pregnant women had consumed more than 100 IFA tablets. For institutional delivery, standard protocols are often not followed during labour and the postpartum period. Sterilization related deaths a preventable tragedy, are often a direct consequence of poor quality of care. Only 61% of children (12-23 months) have been fully immunized.<br /> <br /> • In AIDS control, progress has been good with a decline from a 0.41% prevalence rate in 2001 to 0.27% in 2011 but this still leaves about 21 lakh persons living with HIV, with about 1.16 lakh new cases and 1.48 deaths in 2011. In tuberculosis the challenge is a prevalence of close to 211 cases and 19 deaths per 100,000 population and rising problems of multi-drug resistant tuberculosis. Though these are significant declines from the MDG baseline, India still contributes to 24% of all global new case detection.<br /> <br /> • Over 75% of communicable diseases are not part of existing national programmes. Overall, communicable diseases contribute to 24.4% of the entire disease burden while maternal and neonatal ailments contribute to 13.8%. Non-communicable diseases (39.1%) and injuries (11.8%) now constitute the bulk of the country's disease burden. National Health Programmes for non-communicable diseases are very limited in coverage and scope, except perhaps in the case of the Blindness control programme.<br /> <br /> • The gap between service availability and needs is widest in the case of mental illness- 43 facilities in the nation with a 0.47 psychologists per million people.<br /> <br /> • The elderly i.e. the population above 60 years comprise 8.6% of the population (103.8 million) and they are also a vulnerable section. Those above 75 years (20.52 million) are most vulnerable and almost 8% of the elderly population is bed ridden or homebound (NSSO).<br /> <br /> **page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The report entitled [inside]Economic Burden of Tobacco Related Diseases in India[/inside] (please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/economic_burden_of_tobacco_related_diseases_in_india_executive_summary.pdf" title="Economic Burden of tobacco related diseases">click here</a> to download the Executive Summary), supported by the Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India and the WHO Country Office for India, was developed by the Public Health Foundation of India (PHFI).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The report estimates direct and indirect costs from all diseases caused due to tobacco use and four specific diseases namely, respiratory diseases, tuberculosis, cardiovascular diseases and cancers. The report also highlights that tobacco use and the associated costs are creating an enormous burden for the nation.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The total economic costs attributable to tobacco use from all diseases in India in the year 2011 for persons aged 35-69 amounted to Rs. 104500 crores of which 16 percent was direct cost and 84 percent was indirect cost. </p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to the report, massive direct medical costs of tobacco attributable diseases amount to Rs.16,800 crore and associated indirect morbidity cost of Rs. 14,700 crore. The cost from premature mortality is Rs. 73,000 crores, indicating a substantial productive loss to the nation, the report states. </p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to the United Nations' report (released in May, 2014) entitled [inside]Trends in maternal mortality estimates 1990 to 2013[/inside], (please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Trends%20in%20Maternal%20Mortality%201990%20to%202013.pdf" title="Trends in Maternal Mortality 1990 to 2013">click here</a> to download): </p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em><strong>Indian scenario</strong></em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Maternal mortality ratio (MMR)* in India stood at 560 maternal deaths (per 100000 live births) during 1990, 460 during 1995, 370 during 2000, 280 during 2005 and 190 during 2013.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• As compared to India (MMR: 190 per 100000 live births), Brazil (MMR: 69) and China (MMR: 32) performed better in reducing maternal deaths.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• An Indian woman’s lifetime risk of maternal death** – the probability that a 15 year old woman will eventually die from a maternal cause – is 1 in 190, whereas for a Chinese woman it is 1 in 1800 and for a Brazilian woman it is 1 in 780. </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• At the country level, the two countries that accounted for one third of all global maternal deaths are India at 17 percent (50000) and Nigeria at 14 percent (40000). </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The proportion of deaths among women of reproductive age that are due to maternal causes (PM)*** in India is 6.7 percent whereas for China it is 1.6 percent and for Brazil it is 2.8 percent.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The ten countries that comprised 58 percent of the global maternal deaths reported in 2013 are: India (50000, 17%); Nigeria (40000, 14%); Democratic Republic of the Congo (21000, 7%); Ethiopia (13000, 4%); Indonesia (8800, 3%); Pakistan (7900, 3%); United Republic of Tanzania (7900, 3%); Kenya (6300, 2%); China (5900, 2%); Uganda (5900, 2%). </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• India could reduce MMR by 65 percent between 1990 and 2013.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The present report has classified India among 96 countries with incomplete civil registration and/or other types of maternal mortality data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em><strong>Global scenario</strong></em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Every day, approximately 800 women die from preventable causes related to pregnancy and childbirth.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Under MDG5, countries committed to reducing maternal mortality by three quarters between 1990 and 2015. Since 1990, maternal deaths worldwide have dropped by 45%. However, between 1990 and 2013, the global maternal mortality ratio (i.e. the number of maternal deaths per 100 000 live births) declined by only 2.6% per year. This is far from the annual decline of 5.5% required to achieve MDG5.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• 99 percent of all maternal deaths occur in developing countries. More than half of these deaths occur in sub-Saharan Africa and almost one third occur in South Asia.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The maternal mortality ratio in developing countries in 2013 is 230 per 100 000 live births versus 16 per 100 000 live births in developed countries. </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• A woman’s lifetime risk of maternal death – the probability that a 15 year old woman will eventually die from a maternal cause – is 1 in 3700 in developed countries, versus 1 in 160 in developing countries.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Maternal mortality is higher in women living in rural areas and among poorer communities.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Young adolescents face a higher risk of complications and death as a result of pregnancy than older women.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The major complications that account for 80% of all maternal deaths are: a. severe bleeding (mostly bleeding after childbirth); b. infections (usually after childbirth); c. high blood pressure during pregnancy (pre-eclampsia and eclampsia); and d. unsafe abortion. The remainder are caused by or associated with diseases such as malaria, and AIDS during pregnancy. Skilled care before, during and after childbirth can save the lives of women and newborn babies.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• While levels of antenatal care have increased in many parts of the world during the past decade, only 46 percent of women in low-income countries benefit from skilled care during childbirth.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Other factors that prevent women from receiving or seeking care during pregnancy and childbirth are: poverty, distance, lack of information, inadequate services and cultural practices. </p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Note: </strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">* Maternal mortality ratio (MMR) is the number of maternal deaths during a given time period per 100000 live births during the same time period.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">** Adult lifetime risk of maternal death is the probability that a 15-year-old women will die eventually from a maternal cause.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">*** Proportion of deaths among women of reproductive age that are due to maternal causes (PM) is the number of maternal deaths in a given time period divided by the total deaths among women aged 15–49 years.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Rural%20Health%20Statistics%20of%20India%202012.pdf" title="Rural Health Statistics of India 2012">click here</a> to access the latest edition of [inside]Rural Health Statistics in India 2012[/inside] that was released by the Union health ministry. The report provides detailed statistics on rural health infrastructure on the basis of information available up to March, 2012 and data provided by the States and Union Territories.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> According to the UNICEF report titled [inside]Committing to Child Survival: A Promise Renewed Progress Report 2013[/inside] (please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/APR_Progress_Report_2013_9_Sept_2013_1.pdf" title="UNICEF child mortality report">click here</a> to download):<br /> <br /> <strong><em>Indian scenario</em></strong><br /> <br /> • Under Five Mortality Rate (Probability of dying between birth and exactly 5 years of age, expressed per 1,000 live births) in India for the year 2012, stands at 56 and India's ranking in terms of U5MR is 49. In 2012, the neonatal mortality rate (Probability of dying in the first month of life, expressed per 1,000 live births) at national level is at 31. The share of neonatal deaths in under-five deaths stood at 55 percent in 2012 as compared to 41 percent in 1990. <br /> <br /> • U5MR in India declined by 55 percent from 126 in 1990 to 56 in 2012. Infant Mortality Rate (Probability of dying between birth and exactly 1 year of age, expressed per 1,000 live births) declined from 88 in 1990 to 44 in 2012. Neonatal mortality rate declined from 51 in 1990 to 31 in 2012. <br /> <br /> • U5MR in India among boys declined from 121 in 1990 to 54 in 2012. U5MR in India among girls declined from 130 in 1990 to 59 in 2012.<br /> <br /> • In 2012, 21 percent deaths among Indian children under 5 years of age occurred due to pneumonia, 10 percent due to diarrhoea, 1 percent due to malaria, 3 percent due to measles and 43 percent due to neonatal causes.<br /> <br /> • Half of all under-five deaths occur in just five countries: India (22%), Nigeria (13%), Pakistan, the Democratic Republic of the Congo (each 6%) and China (4%).<br /> <br /> • Around two-thirds of neonatal deaths occur in just 10 countries, with India accounting for more than one-quarter and Nigeria for a tenth. More than 4 in 10 of all neonatal deaths worldwide occur in just three countries: India, Nigeria, and Pakistan.<br /> <br /> • More than half of the under-five deaths caused by pneumonia or diarrhoea occur in just four countries: India, Nigeria, Pakistan and the Democratic Republic of the Congo.<br /> <br /> • The Governments of Ethiopia, India and the United States, together with the UN agency, launched in 2012 ‘Committing to Child Survival: A Promise Renewed', a global effort to accelerate efforts to stop young children from dying from preventable causes. Some 176 governments have signed on, including those making some of the greatest strides in under-five mortality.<br /> <br /> • In February 2013, the Government of India, another cosponsor of the global Call to Action, convened a national forum of state policymakers, technical advisors, civil society organizations and private-sector partners to identify and commit to high-impact strategies that can accelerate the decline in preventable child deaths.<br /> <br /> <strong><em>Global scenario</em></strong><br /> <br /> • In 2012, around 6.6 million children died globally before their fifth birthday, at a rate of around 18,000 per day. Since 1990, 216 million children have died before their fifth birthday — more than the current total population of Brazil, the world’s fifth most populous country.<br /> <br /> • Of the 6.6 million under-five deaths globally in 2012, most were from preventable causes such as pneumonia, diarrhoea or malaria; around 44% of deaths in children under 5 occurred during the neonatal period. Pneumonia and diarrhoea remain leading causes of deaths among children under 5, killing almost 5,000 children under 5 every day. Malaria remains an important cause of child death, killing 1,200 children under 5 every day.<br /> <br /> • Global progress in reducing child deaths since 1990 has been very significant. The global rate of under-five mortality has roughly halved, from 90 deaths per 1,000 live births in 1990 to 48 per 1,000 in 2012. The estimated annual number of under-five deaths has fallen from 12.6 million to 6.6 million over the same period.<br /> <br /> • Put another way, 17,000 fewer children die each day in 2012 than did in 1990 — thanks to more effective and affordable treatments, innovative ways of delivering critical interventions to the poor and excluded, and sustained political commitment. These and other vital child survival interventions have helped to save an estimated 90 million lives in the past 22 years.<br /> <br /> • The global annual rate of reduction in under-five deaths has steadily accelerated since 1990-1995, when it stood at 1.2%, more than tripling to 3.9% in 2005-2012. Both sub-Saharan African regions—particularly Eastern and Southern Africa but also West and Central Africa—have seen a consistent acceleration in reducing under-five deaths, particularly since 2000.<br /> <br /> • At the current rate of reduction in under-five mortality, the world will only make MDG 4 by 2028 — 13 years after the deadline — and 35 million more children will die between 2015 and 2028 whose lives could be saved if we were able to make the goal on time in 2015 and continue that trend.<br /> <br /> • Accelerating progress in child survival urgently requires greater attention to ending preventable child deaths in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia, which together account for 4 out of 5 under-five deaths globally.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page** </p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to the [inside]Pneumonia Progress Report, 2012[/inside], released by IVAC and John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012.pdf" title="Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012">click here</a> to access:</p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The 2000-2010 decade brought a significant reduction in overall child mortality, from 9.6 to 7.6 million. Pneumonia continues to be the number one killer of children around the world-causing 18% of all child mortality, an estimated 1.3 million child deaths in 2011 alone.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Nearly 99 percent of all pneumonia deaths occur in developing countries, and three-quarters take place in just 15 countries. The majority of pneumonia cases are preventable or treatable.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Pneumonia is the leading cause of child mortality in India, responsible for the deaths of nearly 400,000 children under five in 2010.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Percentage of Indian children with suspected pneumonia receiving antibiotics stood at 13 percent in 2010.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Percentage of under-five Indian children with suspected pneumonia taken to appropriate health-care provider stood at 69 percent in 2010.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Percentage of children receiving exclusive breastfeeding in first 6 months of life is 46 percent (as per latest available data during 2006-2010).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Vaccine coverage in the case of DTP3 (third dose of diphtheria and tetanus toxoid and pertussis vaccine) is 72 percent and in the case of measles is 74 percent in 2011. </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• India and Nigeria, two large countries with the highest numbers of child deaths worldwide, remain low scorers with an average intervention coverage (interventions in terms of vaccination, breastfeeding, access to care and antibiotic treatment) rate of 55% and 40%, respectively.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• One notable area of progress in India is on coverage of two vaccines that can help prevent pneumonia, Hib vaccine and measles vaccine. While Hib vaccine uptake has been slow in India’s public sector, momentum is now shifting following efforts by the Ministry of Health & Family Welfare (MOHFW), states, health experts and advocates to prioritize implementation of the National Technical Advisory Group on Immunization’s (NTAGI) recommendation to add Hib to the Universal Immunization Programme (UIP). </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Two Indian states, Tamil Nadu and Kerala, introduced Hib vaccines (in the form of the pentavalent vaccine) in December 2011, and six more are slated to do so by the end of 2012. At a recent Hib Symposium in the state of Odisha, MOHFW officials stated that at least twice as many additional states have expressed interest in the vaccine.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• India has joined other WHO Member States in introducing a second dose of measles vaccine into the UIP to ensure its children are protected from the virus, which contributes to the burden of pneumonia. Measles was once one of the leading causes of death in children, but global measles deaths have declined dramatically because of widespread coverage with two doses of measles vaccine. India began a phased introduction of the second dose in 2010; by the end of the first year, the second dose of measles vaccine had been added to routine immunization in 21 states and catch-up campaigns were completed in 197 districts in 14 states.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to the report titled: [inside]Defeating malaria in Asia, the Pacific, Americas, Middle East and Europe, November, 2012[/inside], which has been produced by World Health Organization and PATH, <a href="http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Defeating%20malaria.pdf">http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Defeating%20malaria.pdf</a>: </p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The Indian Commission on Macroeconomics and Health notes that, in India, 13 household person-days per patient were lost per episode of malaria. Furthermore, the commission estimated that the overall monetary losses to families (income losses together with treatment expenses) could amount to between 200 and 400 Indian rupees (US$ 3.5 to 7).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• With an estimated 22.5 million malaria cases in India, this translates to an annual cost of US$ 79 to 157 million, or 0.01% of gross domestic product each year. </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• In states with the highest incidence rates, such as Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Meghalaya, Mizoram, and Orissa, the annual cost of illness represents more than 0.1% of a gross state income.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Tribal populations living in forests in Orissa, India, have incidence rates that are almost 10 times higher than in the plains.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Odisha is one of the most highly malaria-endemic states in India, accounting for 24% of reported cases in 2010 despite consisting of less of than 4% of the national population. Malaria is particularly common among tribal groups which represent 44% of the population of Orissa.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• A study in Sundargarh District of Odisha showed that forest areas had an annual incidence of 280 cases per 1000 population compared to 30 cases per 1000 on the plains. Approximately 84% of infections in forest areas were due to P. falciparum compared to 69% in plain areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Malaria’s main victims tend to be poorer populations living in rural communities, with limited or no access to long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• WHO estimates that 216 million cases of malaria occurred globally in 2010; 34 million (16%) of these occurred outside of Africa of which 18.1 million (53%) were due to P. falciparum. </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• WHO estimates that 655 000 deaths occurred globally, of which 46 000 (7%) occurred outside of Africa. WHO estimates that 2.5 billion people were at risk of malaria outside of Africa.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• There are 98 countries with ongoing transmission of malaria. Of these, 47 lie on the African continent, 21 are in the Americas, and 30 in Europe, Asia, and the Pacific. Of the 98 countries, 81 are in the control phase, 8 in the pre-elimination phase, and 9 in the elimination phase.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• While the disease burden has been declining in countries with fewer malaria cases and deaths, progress has been slower in countries where the bulk of the disease burden lies: India, Indonesia, Myanmar, Pakistan, and Papua New Guinea. These five high-burden countries account for 89% of all malaria cases in the region.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Malaria transmission occurs in 17 countries of Asia. Approximately 2 billion people in the region live at some risk of malaria, of which 525 million live at high risk (reported incidence more than 1 case per 1000 population per year).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Most reported cases of malaria in Asia are due to P. falciparum although the proportion varies considerably by country; it exceeds 80% in the Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Myanmar, Timor-Leste, and Viet Nam, while transmission is exclusively due to P. vivax in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea and the Republic of Korea.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Insecticide resistance has now been reported in 24 out of 51 countries with malaria transmission outside of Africa.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page** </p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to [inside]Children in India 2012-A Statistical Appraisal[/inside], Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, GoI, please <a href="https://im4change.org/docs/659Children_in_India_2012.pdf">click here</a> to access:</p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em><strong>Neonatal Mortality Rate</strong></em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">• In 2010, the neonatal mortality rate (Probability of dying in the first month of life, expressed per 1,000 live births) at national level is at 33 and ranges from 19 in urban areas to 36 in rural areas. Among bigger states, neo-natal mortality rate is highest in Madhya Pradesh (44) and lowest in Kerala (7).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The rural–urban gap in neo natal mortality rate was highest in Andhra Pradesh and Assam (23 points), followed by Rajasthan (22 points). The rural –urban gap in neo natal mortality rate lowest in Kerala (3 points), followed by Tamil Nadu (6 points).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Factors which affect fetal and neonatal deaths are primarily endogenous, while those which affect post neonatal deaths are primarily exogenous. The endogenous factors are related to the formation of the foetus in the womb and are therefore, mainly biological in nature. Among the biological factors affecting fetal and neonatal infant mortality rates the important ones are the age of the mother, birth order, period of spacing between births, prematurity, weight at birth, mothers health.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em><strong>Infant Mortality Rate </strong></em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Infant Mortality Rate (Probability of dying between birth and exactly 1 year of age, expressed per 1,000 live births) has declined for males from 78 in 1990 to 46 in 2010 and for females the decline was from 81 to 49 during this period.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Infant Mortality Rate for the country as a whole declined from 66 in 2001 to 47 in 2010. With the present improved trend due to sharp fall during 2008-09, the national level estimate of infant mortality rate is likely to be 44 against the MDG target of 27 in 2015.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Infant Mortality Rate has declined in urban areas from 50 in 1990 to 31 in 2010, whereas in rural areas Infant Mortality Rate has declined from 86 to 51 during the same period.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Infant Mortality Rate in 2010, was lowest in Goa (10) followed by Kerala (13) and Manipur (14). The States of Madhya Pradesh (62), Orissa (61), Uttar Pradesh (61), Assam (58), Meghalaya (55), Rajasthan (55), Chhattisgarh (51), Bihar (48) and Haryana (48) reported infant mortality rate above the national average (47).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Among infants, the main causes of death are: Certain Conditions Originating in the Perinatal Period (67.2%), Certain infectious and Parasitic diseases (8.3%), Diseases of the Respiratory System (7.7%), Congenial Malformations, Deformations & chromosomal Abnormalities (3.3%), Other causes (10.6%).</p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em><strong>Under Five Mortality Rate </strong></em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Under Five Mortality Rate (Probability of dying between birth and exactly 5 years of age, expressed per 1,000 live births) in India for the year 2010, stands at 59 and it varies from 66 in rural areas to 38 in Urban areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Under Five Mortality Rate stood at 64 for females whereas it is 55 for males in 2010.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Under Five Mortality Rate varies from lowest in Kerala (15), followed by 27 in Tamil Nadu to alarmingly high level in Assam (83), followed by Madhya Pradesh (82), Uttar Pradesh (79) and Odisha (78).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Given to reduce Under Five Mortality Rate to 42 per thousand live births by 2015, India tends to reach near to 52 by that year missing the target by 10 percentage points.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Among children aged 0 to 4 years, the main causes of death are: Certain infectious and Parasitic Diseases (23.1%), Diseases of the Respiratory System (16.1%), Diseases of the Nervous System (12.1%), Diseases of the Circulatory System (7.9%), Injury, Poisoning etc (0.9%), Other major causes (33.9 %).</p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em><strong>Immunization</strong></em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">• At national level, 61% of the children aged 12-23 months have received full immunization in 2009. The coverage of immunization was higher in urban areas (67.4%) as compared to that in the rural areas (58.5%). </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Nearly 8% Indian children did not receive even a single vaccine in 2009. Nearly 62% of the male children aged 12-23 months have received full immunization, while among the females it was nearly 60%.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• 76.6 percent of children aged 12-23 months received full immunization coverage whose mothers had 12 or more years of education whereas 45.3 percent of children whose mothers had no education got full immunization.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• About 75.5% of children of less than one year belonging to the highest wealth index group are fully immunized while only 47.3% from the lowest quintile are fully immunized.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The full immunization coverage of children age 12-23 months is highest in Goa (87.9%), followed by Sikkim (85.3%), Punjab (83.6%), and Kerala (81.5%). The full immunization coverage is lowest in Arunachal Pradesh (24.8%).</p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to [inside]WHO Global Report: Mortality Attributable to Tobacco (2012)[/inside], please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Mortality%20due%20to%20tobacco.pdf" title="Mortality due to tobacco">click here</a> to access: </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Globally 12% of all deaths among adults aged 30 years and over were attributed to tobacco as compared with 16% in India, 17% in Pakistan and 31% in Bangladesh. </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• In India, the death rate from non-communicable diseases (NCDs) [1096 per 100,000 population] was about 3.3 times that for communicable diseases [336 per 100,000]. Tobacco was responsible for 9% of all NCDs as compared with 2% of all communicable disease related deaths. </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The death rate due to tobacco in Indian men was 206 [per 100,000 men aged 30 years and over] as compared with 13 [per 100,000 women aged 30 years and over] for women. The proportion of deaths attributable to tobacco was almost 12% for men and 1% for women in India. </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Within the NCDs, ischaemic heart disease accounted for 329 deaths per 100,000 population aged 30 years and over, with 5% of these deaths attributed to tobacco in India. Cancer of the trachea, bronchus and lung accounted for 16 deaths per 100,000 population but with 58% of these deaths attributed to tobacco. </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Within the communicable disease group, deaths attributed to tobacco accounted for 5% of all lower respiratory infection deaths and 4% of all tuberculosis deaths in India. </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The regions with the highest proportion of deaths atrributable to tobacco are the Americas and the European regions where tobacco has been used for a longer period of time. </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• 71% of all lung cancer deaths globally are attributable to tobacco use. 42% of all chronic deaths globally are attributable to tobacco use. </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Direct tobacco smoking is currently responsible for the death of about 5 million people worldwide each year with many deaths occuring prematurely. An additional 600,000 people are estimated to die from the effects of second-hand smoke.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• In next 2 decades, the annual death from tobacco globally is expected to rise to over 8 million, with more than 80% of those deaths projected to occur in low-and middle-income countries. </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• If effective measures are not urgently taken, tpbacco could in the 21st century kill over 1 billion people worldwide. Tobacco kills more than tuberculosis, HIV/ AIDS and malaria combined.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to the report titled [inside]The Growing Danger of Non-Communicable Diseases: Acting Now to Reverse Course (2011)[/inside], September, The World Bank, please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/The%20Growing%20Danger%20of%20Non-Communicable%20Diseases.pdf" title="The Growing Danger of Non-Communicable Diseases">click here</a> to access:</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> • Heart disease, cancer, diabetes, chronic respiratory conditions, and other non-communicable diseases (NCDs) increasingly threaten the physical health and economic security of many lower-and middle-income countries.<br /> <br /> • The change in mortality and disease levels will be particularly substantial in Sub-Saharan Africa, where NCDs will account for 46 percent of all deaths by 2030, up from 28 percent in 2008, and in South Asia, which will see the share of deaths from NCDs increase from 51 to 72 percent during the same period. More than 30 percent of these deaths will be premature and preventable. These lower-income countries will, at the same time, continue to grapple with the widespread prevalence of communicable diseases such as HIV, malaria, tuberculosis, and mother and child conditions, and so face a “double burden” of disease not experienced by their wealthier counterparts.<br /> <br /> • The potential cost of NCDs to economies, health systems, households and individuals in middle- and lower-income countries is high. In many middle- and lower-income countries, NCDs are affecting populations at younger ages, resulting in longer periods of ill-health, premature deaths and greater loss of productivity that is so vital for development.<br /> <br /> • Much of the rise in NCDs in developing countries is attributable to modifiable risk factors such as physical inactivity, malnutrition in the first thousand days of life and later an unhealthy diet (including excessive salt, fat, and sugar intake), tobacco use, alcohol abuse, and exposure to environmental pollution.<br /> <br /> • Country evidence suggests that more than half of the NCD burden could be avoided through effective health promotion and disease prevention programs that tackle such risk factors. Particularly effective at very low costs are measures to curb tobacco, such as taxes, as indicated in the “WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control”, and to reduce salt in processed and semi processed foods.<br /> <br /> • By 2030, cancer incidence is projected to increase by 70 percent in middle-income countries and 82 percent in lower-income countries.<br /> <br /> • While increases in NCD-related mortality and ill-health in part reflect countries’ successes in extending lives and curbing communicable diseases, a significant part of the increase is a result of modifiable risk factors, many of which are linked to modernization, urbanization, and lifestyle changes.<br /> <br /> • The rise of NCDs amongst younger populations may jeopardize many countries’ “demographic dividend”, including the economic benefits expected to be generated during the period when a relatively larger part of the population is of working age. Instead, these countries will have to contend with the costs associated with populations that are living with longer episodes of illhealth.<br /> <br /> • Cardiovascular disease is already a major cause of death and disability in South Asia, where the average age of first-time heart attack sufferers is 53 compared to 59 in the rest of the world.<br /> <br /> • A recent study illustrated the economic impact of NCDs in India by estimating that if NCDs were “eliminated”, the country’s 2004 GDP would have been 4 to 10 percent greater.<br /> <br /> • The share of out-of-pocket household health expenditures on NCDs in India increased from 32 percent to 47 percent between 1995–1996 and 2004. Moreover, 40 percent of these expenditures were financed by borrowing and sales of assets, increasing the household’s financial vulnerability. NCDs also increase the risk of households incurring “catastrophic” health costs. In South Asia, the chance of incurring catastrophic hospitalization expenditures was 160 percent higher for cancer patients and 30 percent higher for those with cardiovascular diseases than it was for those with a communicable disease requiring hospitalization .<br /> <br /> • Because of their specific characteristics, NCDs affect adults—often in their productive years, require costly long term treatment and care, and often are accompanied by some degree of disability. Therefore, they could potentially have greater socio-economic impact than other health conditions. Increased NCD levels can: reduce labor supply and outputs, increase costs to employers (from absenteeism and higher health care coverage costs), lower returns on human capital investments, reduced domestic consumption and lower tax revenues, as well as increased public health and social welfare expenditures.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to the report titled: [inside]AIDS at 30: Nations at the crossroads (2011)[/inside], which has been brought out by UNAIDS, please <a href="http://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/media_asset/aids-at-30_1.pdf">click here</a> to access: <br /> <br /> • The number of people living with HIV was around 34 million worldwide in 2010.<br /> <br /> • There were 2.6 million new HIV infections worldwide in 2009.<br /> <br /> • Between 1981 and 2000, the number of people living with HIV rose from less than one million to an estimated 27.5 million [26–29 million].<br /> <br /> • Low- and middle-income countries accounted for 95% or more of the global HIV burden by 1998.<br /> <br /> • While less than 1% of adults in South Africa were living with HIV in 1990, 16.1% were living with HIV a decade later. During the same period, adult HIV prevalence rose from less than 1% to 24.5% in Lesotho, and from 3.5% to 26% in Botswana.<br /> <br /> • Half of HIV infections in Eastern Europe and Central Asia in 2010 were due to drug users sharing needles.<br /> <br /> • Clinical trials show that male circumcision reduces the chance of men becoming HIV-positive by about 60%.<br /> <br /> • Beginning in 2005, a series of randomized controlled trials in sub-Saharan Africa found that circumsising adult men reduced their risk of infection by about 60%.<br /> <br /> • Scientific knowledge about HIV expanded steadily in the years 1981–2000. The virus was identified in 1983, and the first serologic test became available in 1985. In the 1990s, studies demonstrated in developed and low- and middle-income countries the possibility of significantly lowering the risk of vertical transmission.<br /> <br /> • Today, 94% of countries (162 of 172 countries reporting) have national HIV strategic plans, up from 87% in 2006. The coordination of national responses also improved during the epidemic’s third decade. Two out of three (67%) countries in 2010 reported having a single HIV monitoring and evaluation system, up from 46% in 2006, although country reports cite insufficient coordination of diverse partners as a continuing challenge to national responses.<br /> <br /> • According to the latest UNGASS reports, AIDS expenditures in 2009 totalled US$ 1.07 billion. Estimates based on the methodology suggested by the Commission on AIDS in Asia indicate that US$ 3.3 billion is needed for a targeted response across the region.<br /> <br /> • There was a significant increase in investment in the HIV response in low- and middle-income countries between 2001 and 2009, with total expenditure rising nearly 10-fold, from US$ 1.6 billion to US$ 15.9 billion.<br /> <br /> • Public and private domestic resources accounted for 52% of total spending on HIV programmes in low- and middle-income countries in 2009, but many low-income countries remain heavily dependent on external financing. In 56 countries, international donors supply at least 70% of HIV resources. This pattern potentially encourages the emergence of new global inequities, as millions of people in sub-Saharan Africa now rely on external donors on a daily basis for the drugs and services that keep them alive.<br /> <br /> • The UNAIDS Domestic Investment Priority Index, a formula that accounts for total HIV burden and government resources, shows that eight of 14 countries in West and Central Africa, six of 16 countries in Eastern and Southern Africa, and all but four countries in Asia were allocating inadequate resources to HIV in 2009.<br /> <br /> • According to research from nine countries under the People Living with HIV Stigma Index, 53% of Rwandans living with HIV have been verbally insulted, 33% of rural Zambians living with HIV have experienced physical violence, and 65% of Rwandans living with HIV have lost a job or income opportunity. Furthermore, women living with HIV from various countries report abuses of their sexual and reproductive health and rights. Nearly 20% of women in Namibia who participated in discussions and interviews with the International Community of Women Living with HIV (ICW), reported that they had been coerced or forced into sterilization. Such deep-seated social ostracism and discriminatory actions discourage people from being tested for HIV or seeking other needed services.<br /> <br /> • Among young women in South Africa, experience of intimate partner violence increases the odds of becoming infected with HIV by 11.9%, while gender inequality within a relationship increases the risk by 13.9%, according to a study reported in The Lancet in 2010.<br /> <br /> • According to the UNAIDS Global Report 2010, the proportion of countries reporting programmes to address stigma and discrimination increased from 39% in 2006 to 92% in 2010, although a budget for these programmes was in place in less than half of these countries.<br /> <br /> • More than 56 countries have laws that specifically criminalize HIV transmission or exposure, with the majority of prosecutions reported in high-income countries. As of April 2011, 47 countries, territories and areas imposed some form of restriction on the entry, stay and residence of people living with HIV. However, in a more positive development, China, Namibia and USA lifted their HIV-related travel restrictions in 2010, while Ecuador and India clarified that no such restrictions were in place.<br /> <br /> • In 116 countries, territories and areas, some aspect of sex work is criminalized. Seventy-nine countries and territories worldwide criminalize consensual same-sex sexual relations, including 85% of countries in Eastern and Southern Africa, 81% in the Middle East and North Africa, and 69% in the Caribbean.<br /> <br /> • Thirty-two countries have laws that allow for the death penalty for drug-related offences, and 27 provide for the compulsory detention of people who use drugs, often without due process or minimum standards of detention or treatment. Such laws, as well as abusive law enforcement and poor access to legal services, deter individuals from seeking needed services, increase their vulnerability to becoming HIV-positive, and intensify their social isolation.<br /> <br /> • As of December 2010, an estimated 6.6 million people in low- and middle-income countries were receiving antiretroviral therapy, an increase of 1.4 million from a year earlier. Between 2001 and 2010, the number of people receiving antiretroviral treatment rose nearly 22-fold, a vivid illustration of the power of international solidarity, innovative approaches and people-centred responses.<br /> <br /> • In sub-Saharan Africa the number of people receiving antiretroviral treatment in 2010 increased by 31%; in the Middle East and North Africa, that figure was 21%.<br /> <br /> • As of December 2009, seven countries had already reached at least 80% of treatment-eligible individuals with antiretroviral treatment. Eighteen countries reported treatment coverage of at least 60%.<br /> <br /> • Since its emergence in 1996, highly active anti retroviral therapy has saved an estimated 14.4 million life years worldwide as of December 2009. Although 54% of life-years saved between 1995 and 2009 were in Western Europe and North America, where antiretroviral therapy has long been available, 3.7 million life-years have been saved in sub-Saharan Africa. The pace of reducing morbidity and mortality in sub-Saharan Africa has accelerated since 2005 as a result of dramatic programme scale-up.<br /> <br /> • In 2009, nearly one in five people (18%) who started antiretroviral therapy in low- and middle-income countries were no longer in care 12 months later.<br /> <br /> • At present, more than 95% of patients on treatment are on first-generation antiretroviral medicines, the majority of which are off-patent. As drug resistance increases over time, more patients will require second- and third-generation medicines. Most of these more recent medicines will remain under patent protection for years to come, resulting in potentially drastic increases in treatment costs. This can be alleviated to a large extent by making use of the flexibilities of public health related TRIPS (trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights). In March 2011, UNAIDS, WHO and UNDP issued a policy brief calling on all countries to use TRIPS flexibilities to lower costs and improve access to HIV treatment. By 2005, five years after affordable means of preventing vertical transmission became available, only 15% of HIV-positive pregnant women in low- and middle-income countries received antiretroviral prophylaxis.<br /> <br /> • More than 50% of pregnant women who tested positive for HIV in 2010 were assessed for their eligibility to receive antiretroviral therapy for their own health. These gains in reducing vertical transmission have helped to reduce childhood mortality. The number of children newly infected with HIV in 2009 (370 000 [230 000–510 000]) was 26% lower than in 2001.<br /> <br /> • According to the most recent population-based surveys in low- and middle-income countries with available data, only 24% of young women and 36% of young men responded correctly when asked five questions about HIV prevention methods and popular misconceptions about HIV transmission. Young women tend to be less likely than young men to be aware of the prevention benefits of consistent condom use. When prompted, 74% of young males in DHS surveys knew that using a condom helps to prevent HIV infection, while only 49% of young females knew the right answer. Some 78% of young males also knew that having a single, faithful partner lowers the risk of HIV infection, compared to only 59% of young females.<br /> <br /> • In 14 countries where HIV prevalence exceeds 2% and where nationally representative data are available, more than 70% of men and women who had high-risk sex in the past year report not using a condom the last time they had sex.<br /> <br /> • Globally, HIV prevalence levels above those reported in the general population have been documented among men who have sex with men (MSM), transgender people, people who inject drugs (IDUs), and sex workers.<br /> <br /> • According to the most recently available data, the proportion of countries reporting that they conduct systematic surveillance of HIV among key populations increased between 2008 and 2010: for sex workers, from 44% to 50%; for MSM, from 30% to 36%; while among IDUs it remained stable at 28%.<br /> <br /> • An estimated 20% of the 15.9 million IDUs worldwide are living with HIV. This statistic underscores the world’s failure to put the lessons of harm reduction to use. In at least 69 countries where injecting drug use has been documented, no programme to provide even sterile needles and syringes exists.<br /> <br /> • The epidemic among MSM communities is a worldwide phenomenon, with 63 out of 67 countries reporting in 2009 a higher HIV prevalence among MSM compared with the general population.<br /> <br /> • At least 79 countries, territories and areas have laws against male–male sexual contact, including some that authorize the death penalty.<br /> <br /> • Among 56 countries reporting in both 2008 and 2010, median condom use with the most recent client reached 84%, with a range from about two thirds to nearly 100%.<br /> <br /> • According to recent estimates, HIV is a leading cause of pregnancyrelated deaths, accounting for about 11% of all maternal deaths in 2008.<br /> <br /> • HIV-positive newborns have about a 50% risk of death before age two in the absence of treatment.<br /> <br /> • In 2009, HIV accounted for 2.1% (1.2–3.0%) of under-five deaths in low- and middle-income countries, a decline from 2.6% (1.6–3.5%) in 2000.<br /> <br /> • In sub-Saharan Africa, HIV was responsible for 3.6% (2.0–5.0%) of all deaths in children under five in 2009. Here, too, striking achievements are evident, as the HIV share of all under-five deaths has sharply fallen from the 5.4% (3.3%–7.3%) reported in 2000.<br /> <br /> • Universal access to effective prevention, diagnosis and treatment for HIV-related tuberculosis (TB) could prevent up to one million TB deaths in people living with HIV between now and 2015, but the world is falling far short of this target.<br /> <br /> • Only 28% of TB patients globally knew their HIV status in 2009, and only 5% of people living with HIV were screened for TB. Although early initiation of antiretroviral therapy significantly reduces the risk of death among HIV-positive people with TB, only 37% of these HIV-positive TB patients got HIV therapy in 2009.<br /> <br /> • According to data compiled by WHO, 10 countries accounted for more than 69% of all people with HIV-related TB in 2009.<br /> <br /> • 25% of all TB deaths are in people with HIV, and there are one million cases of TB in people with HIV a year.<br /> <br /> • Between 2001 and 2009, global HIV incidence steadily declined, with the annual rate of new infections falling by nearly 25%.<br /> <br /> • Above-average declines in HIV incidence have occurred in sub-Saharan Africa and in South and South-East Asia, while Latin America and the Caribbean and Oceania regions experienced more modest reductions of less than 25%.<br /> <br /> • Rates of new infections have remained relatively stable in East Asia, Western and Central Europe, and North America. HIV incidence has steadily increased in the Middle East and North Africa, while in Eastern Europe and Central Asia, a decline in new infections was reversed mid-decade, with incidence rising slightly from 2005 to 2009.<br /> <br /> • Coverage of services to prevent new child infections increased from 15% in 2005 to 54% in 2009. The HIV incidence rate declined by more than 25% between 2001 and 2009. Antiretroviral treatment coverage is increasing.<br /> <br /> • Some 22.5 million people now live with HIV in Africa. The majority (60%) are women and girls. HIV prevalence is as high as 25% in some countries, and the rate of people becoming newly infected outpaces treatment access. Of the 16.6 million children globally who have lost one or both parents to an AIDS-related illness, 14.9 million are in Africa.<br /> <br /> • The Asia Pacific region has made significant progress in controlling HIV’s spread. The number of people living with HIV has remained stable for the past five years and estimated new infections are 20% lower than in 2001. Thailand, Cambodia and certain parts of India have turned their epidemics around by providing quality services to their key populations at higher risk.<br /> <br /> • In 2009, median reported prevention coverage for people who inject drugs was 17%; for men who have sex with men 36.5%; and for female sex workers 41%. Programmes in key affected populations to prevent transmission to intimate sexual partners are severely lacking.<br /> <br /> **page**<br /> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Please <a href="https://im4change.org/hunger-hdi/sdgs-113.html?pgno=5#trends-in-maternal-mortality-1990-to-2008-estimates">click here</a> to access the Trends in Maternal Mortality: 1990 to 2008 Estimates developed by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA and The World Bank:</span><br /> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">According to [inside]A Fair Chance at Life: Why Equity Matters for Children (2010)[/inside], which has been prepared by Save the Children, please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/A%20fair%20chance%20of%20life.pdf" title="A fair chance of life">click here</a> to access:</span><br /> <span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"> </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• In 2000, the world’s governments committed themselves to make a two-thirds reduction in the child mortality rate by 2015 – the fourth of eight United Nations Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). But with five years to go before the target date, the world is collectively off track to reach MDG 4. Just 40% of the necessary progress has been achieved so far, and in three-quarters of countries the goal will be missed on current trends. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• The child mortality rate at a global level has fallen by just 28% since the MDG baseline year of 1990, far short of the 67% reduction required to meet the goal. Less than 30% of countries are making equitable progress towards MDG 4.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Ghana, Mozambique, Niger, Egypt, Indonesia, Bolivia and Zambia have made equitable progress in reducing child mortality. Chad, Congo, Kenya, South Africa and Zimbabwe have actually seen increases in their child mortality rates since 1990. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• In sub-Saharan Africa, close to one child in seven still dies before their fifth birthday. Although the mortality rate in sub-Saharan Africa has fallen, high fertility levels mean that the absolute number of child deaths in the region has increased since 1990, from 4.2 to 4.6 million.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Almost all child deaths – 99% – happen in the developing world. A person born in sub-Saharan Africa can expect to live, on average, 52 years. In western Europe, life expectancy is 80 years. The life expectancy rates in sub-Saharan Africa today have not been seen in Europe since the beginning of the 20th century. In 40 developing countries, children have less chance of living to the age of five than a person in the UK has of living to the age of 65.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Sri Lanka – with a per capita income of $1,790 – has a child mortality rate of 13, less than half the level in Guatemala, which has a per capita income of $2,680. Gabon has an equivalent per capita income to Argentina, but a child mortality rate of 57, almost four times higher.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• In India, high levels of selective abortion contribute to skewed male-to-female birth ratios. Son preference in India and China can result in high mortality among girls because they are not adequately breastfed or given the same access to medical treatment. A study of 4,000 children aged between one and two in India found that the likelihood of girls being fully vaccinated was five percentage points lower than that for boys. In Gujarat, India, 50% of women feel they need the permission of their husband or parent-in-law before taking their sick child to a doctor.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• High child mortality, illness and malnutrition can be a brake on economic and social development. Children who are sick and undernourished, especially in the first two years of life, often pay a life-long and irreversible price in terms of physical stunting and reduced cognitive ability.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• On the positive side, of the 68 ‘Countdown to 2015’ countries (which together account for 97% of maternal and child deaths worldwide), 60 have reduced child mortality since 1990. A recent study found that the rate of reduction has accelerated since 2000, compared with the period from 1990 to 2000.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Of the 68 ‘Countdown to 2015’ priority countries, only 19 are on-track to reach MDG 4. Eleven more are making faster-than-average progress, but still not enough progress to achieve MDG 4 by 2015.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• It is estimated that children under five make up 85% of those who die as a result of climate change; 44% of child deaths happen in countries considered fragile; and nearly 70% of the countries with the highest child mortality burden are currently experiencing or have experienced armed violence in the last two decades.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Inadequate care before birth and during delivery contributes to 40% of child deaths. Even babies who survive the neonatal period (up to 28 days) have greatly reduced chances of surviving beyond the age of five if their mothers die, in part because they are less likely to receive adequate nutrition and healthcare.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Although the percentage of stunted children decreased globally from 40% to 27% between 1990 and 2010, the number of stunted children is projected to increase in many areas. In Africa, the number of stunted children is estimated to have increased from 45 million in 1990 to 60 million in 2010.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Undernutrition among pregnant women in developing countries leads to one in six infants being born with low birth weight, which not only carries a high risk of neonatal death, but can also permanently damage long-term cognitive and physical development.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Infectious diseases accounted for an estimated 68% of the 8.8 million child deaths in 2008, with pneumonia accounting for 18% and diarrhoea for 15% of the global total. More than 40% of deaths from pneumonia and diarrhoea take place in sub-Saharan Africa, where 42% of people lack access to an improved water source, and almost 70% are without adequate sanitation.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Improved drinking water sources and proper sanitation are crucial to reducing child deaths from diarrhoea, while an estimated 45% of cases could be prevented by simple hand washing with soap.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• If women and men had equal status, it is estimated that the proportion of underweight children below the age of three years would fall by 13 percentage points globally.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">According to [inside]Women on the Front Lines of Health Care, State of the World's Mothers 2010[/inside], </span><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Women%20on%20the%20front%20line.pdf" title="Women on the front line">click here</a> to access</span><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">: </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Every year, 50 million women in the developing world give birth with no professional help and 8.8 million children and newborns die from easily preventable or treatable causes. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Worldwide, there are 57 countries with critical health workforce shortages, meaning that they have fewer than 23 doctors, nurses and midwives per 10,000 people. Thirty-six of these countries are in sub-Saharan Africa. Making up for these shortages would require an additional 2.4 million doctors, nurses and midwives.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Thirty-six of the countries with critical health worker shortages are in sub-Saharan Africa, which has 12 percent of the world’s population, 25 percent of the global burden of disease, and only 3 percent of the world’s health workers. South and East Asia have 29 percent of the disease burden and only 12 percent of the health workers.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• 41 percent of the child deaths occur among newborn babies in the first month of life.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• 99 percent of child and maternal deaths occur in developing countries where mothers and children lack access to basic health-care services.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• 250,000 women’s lives and 5.5 million children’s lives could be saved each year if all women and children had access to a full package of essential health care.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Every year 8.8 million children die before reaching age 5.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Every year 343,000 women lose their lives due to pregnancy or childbirth complications.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• An additional 4.3 million health workers are needed in developing countries to help save lives and meet the health-related Millennium Development Goals.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• The eleventh annual Mothers’ Index helps document conditions for mothers and children in 160 countries – 43 developed nations and 117 in the developing world – and shows where mothers fare best and where they face the greatest hardships.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• European countries – along with New Zealand and Australia – dominate the top positions while countries in sub-Saharan Africa dominate the lowest tier.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">According to [inside]Performance Audit-Report No. 8 of 2009-10[/inside], please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Performace%20Audit.pdf" title="Performance audit NRHM">click here</a> to access:</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• This is the latest and an extremely significant report on the status and performance of the National Rural Health Mission (NRHM) all over India providing clues for areas of concern and immediate action. Some of the salient features are as follows:</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• The performance audit on implementation of the NRHM was conducted during April-December 2008 in the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, State Health Societies (SHS) of 33 States/UTs, District Health Societies (DHS) of 129 districts and 2369 health centres at block and village levels covering the period from 2005-06 to 2007-08.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• The NRHM initiated decentralised bottom-up planning. This, however, had been hindered by non-completion of household and facility surveys and State specific perspective plans. In nine States, district level annual plans were not prepared during 2005-08 and in 24 States/UTs block and village level annual plans had not been prepared at all.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Village level health and sanitation committees were still to be constituted in nine States. The Rogi Kalyan Samitis (RKS) formed at many health centres, aiming at community ownership of healthcare delivery systems, were characterised by weak or absent grievance redressal mechanisms, outreach and awareness generation efforts.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• No RKS in any State/UT received all the stipulated central grants. In 13 States/UTs, the Samiti failed to generate internal resources, while in the remaining States no mechanism existed to monitor the generation of a third of the RKS funds from internal resources as prescribed.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• The participation of Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs) in the Mission’s activities had not been facilitated and their contribution towards capacity building and service delivery was not effectively monitored. 71 per cent of the districts countrywide were yet to be covered under the Mother NGO scheme.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• During the period 2005-06 to 2007-08, the total outlay/expenditure on the NRHM was Rs. 24,151.45 crore. During the first two years the Centre was contributing 100 per cent of the funds. Thereafter, the States were to contribute 15 per cent of funds during the 11th Five Year Plan (2007-12). However, many of the States were yet to contribute their share to the Mission and this issue needs to be addressed. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Many high focus States where diseases are endemic and health indicators poor, were however, receiving relatively lesser central grants, as high unspent balances of previous years remained, indicating that capacity building needs to be focused on.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Basic facilities (proper buildings, hygienic environment, electricity and water supply etc.) were still absent in many existing health centres with many Primary Health Centres (PHCs) and Community Health Centres (CHCs) being unable to provide guaranteed services such as inpatient services, operation theatres, labour rooms, pathological tests, X-ray facilities and emergency care etc.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• While contract workers have been engaged to fill vacancies, there are still shortages of specialist doctors at CHCs, adequate staff nurses at CHCs/PHCs and Auxiliary Nursing Midwife (ANMs)/ Multi-purpose Worker (MPWs) at Sub Centres.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• In nine States, the stock of essential drugs, contraceptives and vaccines adequate for two months consumption as required under norms were not available in any of the test checked PHCs and CHCs.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Despite holding two National Immunisation Days, six Special National Immunisation Days (and additional rounds in selected districts of Bihar and Uttar Pradesh), 1640 new polio cases had been detected in 17 States/UTs during 2005-08.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> <span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">According to [inside]‘Diarrhoea: Why children are still dying and what can be done?’ (2009)[/inside], please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Diarrhoea%20Why%20children%20are%20still%20dying%20and%20what%20can%20be%20done.pdf" title="Diarrhoea Why children are still dying and what can be done">click here</a> to access:</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Diarrhoea is defined as having loose or watery stools at least three times per day, or more frequently than normal for an individual. Though most episodes of childhood diarrhoea are mild, acute cases can lead to death and other complications. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• The leading cause of diarrhea is lack of sanitation and safe drinking water and the life threatening disease is very easily curable with simple tablets and rehydration. (An estimated 88 per cent of diarrhoeal deaths worldwide are attributable to unsafe water, inadequate sanitation and poor hygiene.)</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Most pathogens that cause diarrhoea share a similar mode of transmission – from the stool of one person to the mouth of another.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• In India, under-five mortality rate (per 1000 live births) was 69 during 2008. The number of under-five deaths was 18,30,000 during 2008. The percentage of children under-five with diarrhoea receiving ORS packet during 2005-2008 was 26%.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Nearly, nine million children under five years of age die each year. Diarrhoea is second only to pneumonia as the cause of these deaths.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Reducing these deaths depends largely on delivering life-saving treatment of low-osmolarity oral rehydration salts (ORS) and zinc tablets to all children in need.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Examples of rehydrating fluids include cereal-based drinks made from a thin gruel of rice, maize, potato or other readily available low-cost grain or root crop the family has at home. Breastmilk is also an excellent drink for fluid replacement and should continue to be given to infants with diarrhoea simultaneously with other oral rehydration solutions.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• According to the latest available figures, an estimated 2.5 billion people lack improved sanitation facilities, and nearly one billion people do not have access to safe drinking water. These unsanitary environments allow diarrhoea-causing pathogens to spread more easily.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Globally, 1.2 billion people practise open defecation, 83 per cent of whom live in 13 countries</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Together, pneumonia and diarrhoea are responsible for an estimated 40 per cent of all child deaths around the world each year.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Nearly 1 in 4 people in developing countries were practising indiscriminate or open defecation in 2006.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Nearly one in five child deaths – about 1.5 million each year – is due to diarrhoea. It kills more young children than AIDS, malaria and measles combined.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Between 1990 and 2006, the proportion of the developing world’s population using an improved drinking water source rose from 71 per cent to 84 per cent. Still, almost 1 billion people lack access to improved drinking water sources, and many households do not treat or safely store their household water supplies.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• The prevention package highlights five main elements that require a concerted approach in their implementation. The package includes: a) rotavirus and measles vaccinations, b) promotion of early and exclusive breastfeeding and vitamin A supplementation, c) promotion of handwashing with soap, d) improved water supply quantity and quality, including treatment and safe storage of household water, and e) community-wide sanitation promotion.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Mortality from diarrhoea has declined over the past two decades from an estimated 5 million deaths among children under five to 1.5 million deaths in 2004 </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Africa and South Asia are home to more than 80 per cent of child deaths due to diarrhoea</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Improving sanitation facilities has been associated with an estimated median reduction in diarrhoea incidence of 36 per cent across reviewed studies.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Interventions to improve water quality at the source, along with treatment of household water and safe storage systems, have been shown to reduce diarrhoea incidence by as much as 47 per cent.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Diarrhoea often leads to stunting in children due to its association with poor nutrient absorption and appetite loss.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Breastmilk contains the nutrients, antioxidants, hormones and antibodies needed by a child to survive and develop.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Undernourished children are more likely to suffer from diarrhoea and its consequences, which, in turn, increases their chances of worsening nutritional status. Today, 129 million children under the age of five in the developing world are underweight for their age. Together, Africa and South Asia account for more than 80 per cent of total underweight children (25 per cent and 57 per cent, respectively). About 40 per cent of children under five years of age are stunted in Africa, and nearly half in South Asia.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Only 37 per cent of infants in developing countries are exclusively breastfed for the first six months of life.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Boys and girls are equally likely to receive ORS to treat diarrhoea. Children in urban areas (39 percent) are more likely to receive ORS than those living in rural areas (31 per cent). Similarly, children from the wealthiest families are 1.5 times as likely to receive ORS to treat their diarrhoea as the poorest children</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">**page**<em> </em></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">According to the [inside]World Health Statistics 2009[/inside], please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/World%20Health%20Statistics%202009.pdf" title="World Health Statistics 2009">click here</a> to access:</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"> </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• The proportion of under-nourished children under five years of age declined from 27% in 1990 to 20% in 2005. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Some 27% fewer children died before their fifth birthday in 2007 than in 1990. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Maternal mortality has barely changed since 1990. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• One third of 9.7 million people in developing countries who need treatment for HIV/AIDS were receiving it in 2007. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• MDG target for reducing the incidence of tuberculosis was met globally in 2004. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• 27 countries reported a reduction of up to 50% in the number of malaria cases between 1990 and 2006. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• The number of people with access to safe drinking-water rose from 4.1 billion in 1990 to 5.7 billion in 2006. About 1.1 billion people in developing regions gained access to improved sanitation in the same period. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Globally, the proportion of children under five years of age suffering from under-nutrition, according to WHO Child Growth Standards, declined from 27% in 1990 to 20% in 2005. But, the progress is uneven, and an estimated 112 million children are underweight. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Globally, the number of children who die before their fifth birthday has been reduced by 27% from 12.5 million estimated in 1990 to 9 million in 2007. This reduction is due to a combination of interventions, including the use of insecticide-treated mosquito nets for malaria, oral rehydration therapy for diarrhoea, increased access to vaccines for a number of infectious diseases and improved water and sanitation. But pneumonia and diarrhoea continue to kill 3.8 million children aged under five each year, although both conditions are preventable and treatable.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• The global maternal mortality ratio of 400 maternal deaths per 100 000 live births in 2005 has barely changed since 1990. Every year an estimated 536 000 women die in pregnancy or childbirth. Most of these deaths occur in sub-Saharan Africa where the maternal mortality ratio is 900 per 100 000 births and where there has been no measurable improvement since 1990. A woman in Africa may face a 1-in-26 lifetime risk of death during pregnancy and childbirth, compared with only 1 in 7300 in the developed regions. 1 There are, however, signs of progress in some countries in Asia and Latin America and the Caribbean.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• The percentage of adults living with HIV worldwide has remained stable since 2000 but there were an estimated 2.7 million new infections during 2007. Moreover, deaths are increasing in parts of Africa, particularly eastern and southern Africa. The use of antiretroviral therapy has increased; in 2007, about 1 million more people living with HIV received the treatment. That means one third of the estimated 9.7 million people in developing countries who need the treatment were receiving it. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• The MDG target for reducing the incidence of tuberculosis was met globally in 2004. Since then, incidence has continued to fall slowly. Thanks to early detection of new cases and effective treatment using the WHO-recommended DOTS treatment strategy, treatment success rates have been consistently improving, with rates rising from 79% in 1990 to 85% in 2006. Multi-drug resistant tuberculosis is a challenge in countries, such as those of the former Soviet Union, while the lethal combination of HIV and tuberculosis is an issue particularly for sub-Saharan African countries. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Efforts to control malaria are beginning to pay off with significant increases in the proportion of children sleeping under insecticide-treated mosquito nets. Although it is still too early to register the global impact, 27 countries – including five in Africa – have reported a reduction of up to 50% in malaria cases between 1990 and 2006. In 2006, the number of cases was estimated to be 250 million globally. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Progress has been made in treating neglected tropical diseases that affect some 1.2 billion people. For example, only 9585 cases of dracunculiasis (guinea-worm disease) were reported in the five countries where the disease is endemic, compared with an estimated 3.5 million reported in 20 such countries in 1985. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• The number of people with access to safe drinking water rose from an estimated 4.1 billion in 1990 to 5.7 billion in 2006. But 900 million people still had to rely on water from what are known as unimproved sources, for example surface water or an unprotected dug well.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Since 1990, an estimated 1.1 billion people in developing regions have gained access to improved sanitation. In 1990, just under 3 billion people had access to sanitation. Their number rose to more than 4 billion by 2006. Yet, in 2006 some 2.5 billion did not have access to improved sanitation and 1.2 billion had to practise open defecation. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Although nearly all developing countries publish an essential medicines list, the availability of medicines at public health facilities is often poor. Surveys in about 30 developing countries show that availability of selected medicines at health facilities was only 35% in the public sector and 63% in the private sector. Lack of medicines in the public sector often means patients have no choice but to purchase them privately or do without treatment. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">According to [inside]National Family Health Survey-III (2005-06)[/inside], </span><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">please <a href="http://rchiips.org/NFHS/nfhs3.shtml" title="http://rchiips.org/NFHS/nfhs3.shtml">click here</a> to access:<br /> <br /> <u><strong>NFHS III reports declining status of nutrition amidst women</strong></u></span><br /> </p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">The NFHS III paints a mixed picture of India’s overall reproductive health status. Women are having fewer children and infant mortality has dropped in the seven-year period since the last NFHS survey in 1998-99. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Anaemia and malnutrition are still widespread among children and adults. And, in an unusual juxtaposition, more adults, especially urban women, are overweight or obese than they were seven years ago. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> <span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:medium"><u><strong>Trend in Family Planning and Fertility</strong></u> </span></span><br /> </p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Fertility has continued to decline since NFHS-2, dropping to an average of 2.7 children from 2.9 children. Ten states, mostly in Southern India, have reached replacement level or below replacement level fertility. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">While son preference remains a barrier to more rapid decline in fertility, an increasing number of women who have only daughters say that they want no more children. In NFHS-3, 62% of women with two daughters and no sons say they want no more children, compared with 47% in NFHS-2. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Declining fertility could be attributed largely to women’s increased use of contraception. For the first time ever, more than half of currently married women in India are using contraception, and their use of modern contraceptive methods increased from 43% to 49% between NFHS-2 and NFHS-3. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">A rise in the average age at marriage is also contributing to the drop in fertility. Forty-five percent of women ages 20-24 were married before the legal age of marriage of 18 years, compared with 50% seven years earlier. This shift in age at marriage also influences the median age at first birth, which increased by six months to 19.8 years. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> <span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:medium"><u><strong>Half of Women Lack Proper Care during Pregnancy and Delivery</strong></u></span></span><br /> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:medium">• More than three-quarters of pregnant women in India received at least some antenatal care (ANC), but only half of women had at least three ANC visits with a health provider during their pregnancy. </span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The disparity between urban and rural women was especially pronounced, with 74% of urban women having ANC at least three times, compared with 43% of rural women. Births assisted by a health professional increased to 49% from 42%, with 75% of urban women but only 39% of rural women in NFHS-3 received assistance from a health professional.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Institutional births increased from 34% to 41%, but most women still deliver their children at home. Only about one-third of women received postnatal care within two days of delivery.<br /> <br /> <span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><u><strong>Infant Mortality Drops, but Full Immunization Coverage Shows Little Progress</strong></u></span></span></span></p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Infant mortality continues to decline, dropping from 68 in 1998-99 to 57 in 2005-06 per thousand births. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">There were particularly notable drops in the infant mortality rate in Bihar, Goa, Haryana, Jammu and Kashmir, Meghalaya, Orissa, Punjab, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, and Uttar Pradesh. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Overall, there was only a marginal improvement in full vaccination coverage, with 44% of children ages 12-23 months receiving all recommended vaccinations, up from 42% seven years earlier. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Substantial improvements in coverage have been made in all vaccinations except DPT, which did not change at all between NFHS-2 and NFHS-3. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Gains are particularly evident for polio vaccination coverage, but nearly one-quarter of children age 12-23 months did not receive three recommended doses. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Progress in vaccination coverage varies markedly among the states. In 11 states, there has been a substantial deterioration in full immunization coverage in the last seven years, due to a decline in vaccination coverage for both DPT and polio. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Large decline were seen in Maharashtra, Mizoram, Andhra Pradesh, and Punjab. On the other hand, there was major improvement in full immunization coverage in Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Sikkim, and West Bengal. Other states with marked improvements in full immunization coverage were Assam, Haryana, Jammu and Kashmir, Madhya Pradesh, Meghalaya, and Uttaranchal. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Diarrhoea continues to be a major health problem for many children. Although knowledge about Oral Rehydration Salts (ORS) for the treatment of diarrhoea is widespread among mothers, only 58% of children with diarrhoea were taken to a health facility, down from 65% seven years earlier. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">There has been a rise in the number of dispensaries and hospitals, nursing personnel and doctors (including primary health care centers) in between 1991 and 2005/06, as could be deciphered from the table below.</span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:medium"><u><strong>Trends in health care infrastructure</strong></u> </span></span></p> <div> <table align="justify" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" style="height:96px; width:417px"> <caption> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> </caption> <tbody> <tr> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"> </span></td> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:medium"><strong>1991 </strong></span></span></td> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:medium"> <strong>2005/2006</strong></span></span></td> </tr> <tr> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"> SC/PHC/CHC (March 2006)</span></td> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"> 57353</span></td> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"> 171567</span></td> </tr> <tr> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"> Dispensaries and Hospitals (all) (1.4.2006)</span></td> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"> 23555</span></td> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"> 32156</span></td> </tr> <tr> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"> Nursing Personnel (2005)</span></td> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"> 143887</span></td> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"> 1481270</span></td> </tr> <tr> </tr> </tbody> </table> </div> ', 'credit_writer' => '', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 10, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'public-health-51', 'meta_title' => '', 'meta_keywords' => '', 'meta_description' => '', 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 51, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [[maximum depth reached]], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 21, 'metaTitle' => 'Hunger / HDI | Public Health', 'metaKeywords' => '', 'metaDesc' => 'KEY TRENDS • The 2019 India TB report says that the country accounted for a quarter of the global tuberculosis (TB) burden with an estimated 27 lakh cases in 2018. In 2018, the country was able to achieve a total notification of 21.5 lakh TB cases, of which...', 'disp' => '<p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">KEY TRENDS </span></p><p style="text-align:justify"> </p><div style="text-align:justify">• The 2019 India TB report says that the country accounted for a quarter of the global tuberculosis (TB) burden with an estimated 27 lakh cases in 2018. In 2018, the country was able to achieve a total notification of 21.5 lakh TB cases, of which 25 percent was from private sector. Majority of the TB burden is among the working age group. Nearly 89 percent of TB cases came from the age group 15-69 years. About 2/3rd of the TB patients were males <strong>*15</strong></div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><div style="text-align:justify">• Maternal Mortality Ratio for India was 370 in 2000, 286 in 2005, 210 in 2010, 158 in 2015 and 145 in 2017. Therefore, the MMRatio for the country reduced by almost 61 percent between 2000 and 2017. MMRatio for China was 59 in 2000, 44 in 2005, 36 in 2010, 30 in 2015 and 29 in 2017. Therefore, the MMRatio for China fell by around 51 percent between 2000 and 2017 <strong>*14</strong> <br /> </div><div style="text-align:justify">• The per capita public expenditure (actual) on health in nominal terms has gone up from Rs. 621 in 2009-10 to Rs. 1,112 in 2015-16. Public expenditure on health (includes health sector expenditure by Centre and States/UTs) as a percentage of GDP was 1.02 percent in 2015-16. There is no significant change in public expenditure on health as a percentage of GDP since 2009-10. The Centre-State share in total public expenditure on health was 31:69 in 2015-16, which used to be 36:64 in 2009-10 <strong>*13</strong><br /><br />• The North-Eastern states had the highest (viz. Rs. 2,878 per capita) and Empowered Action Group (EAG) states (including Assam) had the lowest (viz. Rs. 871 per capita) average per capita public expenditure on health in 2015-16 (excluding UTs). The North-Eastern states had the highest public health expenditure as a percentage of Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP) in 2015-16 (2.76 percent). Public health expenditure as a percentage of GSDP stood at 1.36 percent for EAG states (including Assam) and 0.76 percent for major non-EAG states <strong>*13</strong></div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><div style="text-align:justify">• Of the total disease burden in India in 1990, a tenth was caused by a group of risks including unhealthy diet, high blood pressure, high blood sugar, high cholesterol, and overweight, which mainly contribute to ischaemic heart disease, stroke, and diabetes. The contribution of this group of risks increased massively to a quarter of the total disease burden in India in 2016 <strong>*12</strong><br /><br />• The Out-of-Pocket Expenditure (OOPE) on health by households is Rs. 3,02,425 crores (62.6 percent of total health expenditure, 2.4 percent of GDP, Rs. 2,394 per capita) for the year 2014-15. Private Health Insurance expenditure is Rs. 17,755 crores (3.7 percent of total health expenditure) for the year 2014-15 <strong>*11</strong><br /><br />• Based on available evidence, cardiovascular disease (24 percent), chronic respiratory disease (11 percent), cancer (6 percent) and diabetes (2 percent) are the leading cause of mortality in India <strong>*10</strong><br /> </div><div style="text-align:justify">• The total number of dengue cases in India has grown from 28,292 in 2010 to 40,425 in 2014. The total number of dengue related deaths stood at 131 in 2014 <strong>*10</strong></div><div style="text-align:justify"><br />• The Proportion (per 1000) of Ailing Persons (PAP), measured as the number of living persons reporting ailments (per 1000 persons), was 89 persons in rural India and 118 persons in urban India <strong>*9</strong><br /> </div><div style="text-align:justify">• Private doctors were the most important single source of non-hospitalized treatment in both the sectors (Rural & Urban). More than 70% (72 per cent in the rural areas and 79 per cent in the urban areas) spells of ailment were treated in the private sector (consisting of private doctors, nursing homes, private hospitals, charitable institutions, etc.) <strong>*9</strong></div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><div style="text-align:justify">• It is observed that in rural India, 42 percent hospitalised treatment was carried out in public hospital and rest 58 percent in private hospital. For the urban India, the corresponding figures were 32 percent and 68 percent. It may be noted in this context that households (or persons within households) were segregated in sector (rural/urban) by their place of domicile, and not by the place of treatment <strong>*9</strong></div><p style="text-align:justify"> </p><div style="text-align:justify">• Average medical expenditure per hospitalisation case: Higher amount was spent for treatment per hospitalised case by people in the private hospitals (Rs. 25850) than in the public hospitals (Rs. 6120). The highest expenditure was recorded for treatment of Cancer (Rs. 56712) followed by that for Cardio-vascular diseases (Rs. 31647). Average medical expenditure per non-hospitalisation case was Rs. 509 in rural India and Rs. 639 in urban India <strong>*9</strong><br /><br />• As much as 86 percent of rural population and 82 percent of urban population were still not covered under any scheme of health expenditure support. Government, however, was able to bring about 12 percent urban and 13 percent rural population under health protection coverage through Rastriya Swasthya Bima Yojana (RSBY) or similar plan. Only 12 percent households of the 5th quintile class (Usual Monthly Per Capita Consumer Expenditure) of urban area had some arrangement of medical insurance from private provider <strong>*9</strong></div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><div style="text-align:justify">• The draft National Health Policy 2015 proposes a potentially achievable target of raising public health expenditure to 2.5% of the GDP. It also notes that 40% of this would need to come from Central expenditures. At current prices, a target of 2.5% of GDP translates to Rs. 3800 per capita, representing an almost four fold increase in five years <strong>*8</strong><br /> <br />• Maternal mortality ratio (MMR)* in India stood at 560 maternal deaths (per 100000 live births) during 1990, 460 during 1995, 370 during 2000, 280 during 2005 and 190 during 2013. India could reduce MMR by 65 percent between 1990 and 2013<strong> *7</strong><br /><br />• At the country level, the two countries that accounted for one third of all global maternal deaths are India at 17 percent (50000) and Nigeria at 14 percent (40000)<strong> *7</strong><br /><br />• U5MR in India declined by 55 percent from 126 in 1990 to 56 in 2012. Infant Mortality Rate declined from 88 in 1990 to 44 in 2012. Neonatal mortality rate declined from 51 in 1990 to 31 in 2012. U5MR in India among boys declined from 121 in 1990 to 54 in 2012. U5MR in India among girls declined from 130 in 1990 to 59 in 2012. The share of neonatal deaths in under-five deaths stood at 55 percent in 2012 as compared to 41 percent in 1990 <strong>*6</strong><br /><br />• Pneumonia is the leading cause of child mortality in India, responsible for the deaths of nearly 400,000 children under five in 2010 <strong>*5</strong><br /><br />• The Indian Commission on Macroeconomics and Health notes that, in India, 13 household person-days per patient were lost per episode of malaria. Furthermore, the commission estimated that the overall monetary losses to families (income losses together with treatment expenses) could amount to between 200 and 400 Indian rupees (US$ 3.5 to 7) <strong>*4</strong><br /><br />• Odisha is one of the most highly malaria-endemic states in India, accounting for 24% of reported cases in 2010 despite consisting of less of than 4% of the national population. Malaria is particularly common among tribal groups which represent 44% of the population of Orissa <strong>*4</strong><br /><br />• Globally 12% of all deaths among adults aged 30 years and over were attributed to tobacco as compared with 16% in India, 17% in Pakistan and 31% in Bangladesh <strong>*3</strong><br /><br />• A recent study illustrated the economic impact of Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs) in India by estimating that if NCDs like: heart disease, cancer, diabetes, chronic respiratory conditions, and other NCDs were “eliminated”, the country’s 2004 GDP would have been 4 to 10 percent greater<strong> *2</strong><br /><br />• The share of out-of-pocket household health expenditures on NCDs in India increased from 32 percent to 47 percent between 1995–1996 and 2004. Moreover, 40 percent of these expenditures were financed by borrowing and sales of assets, increasing the household’s financial vulnerability<strong> *2</strong><br /><br />• In NFHS-III, 62% of women with two daughters and no sons say they want no more children, compared with 47% in NFHS-II<strong> *1</strong></div><div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>15.</strong> 2019 India TB report, released in 2019, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, please <a href="https://tbcindia.gov.in/WriteReadData/India%20TB%20Report%202019.pdf" title="https://tbcindia.gov.in/WriteReadData/India%20TB%20Report%202019.pdf">click here</a> and <a href="https://tbcindia.gov.in/index1.php?lang=1&level=1&sublinkid=4160&lid=2807" title="https://tbcindia.gov.in/index1.php?lang=1&level=1&sublinkid=4160&lid=2807">click here</a> to access</div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>14.</strong> Trends in Maternal Mortality 2000 to 2017: Estimates by World Health Orgnization (WHO), United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF), World Bank Group, United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) and the United Nations Population Division (released in September 2019), please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Maternal%20mortality%20Levels%20and%20trends%202000%20to%202017%20Executive%20Summary.pdf" title="Maternal mortality Levels and trends 2000 to 2017 Executive Summary" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Maternal%20mortality%20Levels%20and%20trends%202000%20to%202017%20Executive%20Summary.pdf" title="Maternal mortality Levels and trends 2000 to 2017 Executive Summary">click here</a> and <a href="https://www.unfpa.org/featured-publication/trends-maternal-mortality-2000-2017" title="https://www.unfpa.org/featured-publication/trends-maternal-mortality-2000-2017">click here</a> to access</div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>13</strong>. National Health Profile 2018, 13th Issue, Central Bureau of Health Intelligence, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, please <a href="https://im4change.org/docs/900National%20Health%20Profile%202018%2013th%20Issue%20Central%20Bureau%20of%20Health%20Intelligence%20Ministry%20of%20Health%20&%20Family%20Welfare.pdf" title="https://im4change.org/docs/900National%20Health%20Profile%202018%2013th%20Issue%20Central%20Bureau%20of%20Health%20Intelligence%20Ministry%20of%20Health%20&%20Family%20Welfare.pdf">click here</a> to access </div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>12. </strong>India: Health of the Nation’s States - The India State-Level Disease Burden Initiative, Disease Burden Trends in the States of India 1990 to 2016 (released in October, 2017), prepared by Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), Public Health Foundation of India (PHFI), Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) and Ministry of Health & Family Welfare (MoHFW), please <a href="https://im4change.org/docs/11592India_Health_of.pdf" title="https://im4change.org/docs/11592India_Health_of.pdf">click here</a> to access</div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>11</strong>. National Health Accounts: Estimates for India 2014-15 (released in October, 2017), prepared by the National Health Accounts Technical Secretariat, National Health Systems Resource Centre and Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/National%20Health%20Accounts%20Estimates%20Report%202014-15.pdf" title="National Health Accounts Estimates for India 2014-15" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/National%20Health%20Accounts%20Estimates%20Report%202014-15.pdf" title="National Health Accounts Estimates for India 2014-15">click here</a> to access</div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>10</strong>. National Health Profile 2015, Central Bureau of Health Intelligence, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (please <a href="http://www.cbhidghs.nic.in/E-Book%20HTML-2015/index.html" title="http://www.cbhidghs.nic.in/E-Book%20HTML-2015/index.html">click here</a> to access)</div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>9</strong>. 71st round NSS report: Key Indicators of Social Consumption in India-Health (published in June 2015), please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/nss_71st_ki_health_30june15.pdf" title="NSS 71st Round Health" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/nss_71st_ki_health_30june15.pdf" title="NSS 71st Round Health">click here</a> to access the full report; please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/NSS%20Press%20Release%20Health.pdf" title="NSS Press Note Health" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/NSS%20Press%20Release%20Health.pdf" title="NSS Press Note Health">click here</a> to read the summary of findings</div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>8</strong>. Draft National Health Policy 2015 (published in December 2014), Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (Please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Draft%20National%20Health%20Policy%202015.pdf" title="Draft NHP 2015" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Draft%20National%20Health%20Policy%202015.pdf" title="Draft NHP 2015">click here</a> to download)</div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>7</strong>. United Nations' report (released in May, 2014) entitled Trends in maternal mortality estimates 1990 to 2013, </span>(please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Trends%20in%20Maternal%20Mortality%201990%20to%202013.pdf" title="Trends in Maternal Mortality 1990 to 2013" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Trends%20in%20Maternal%20Mortality%201990%20to%202013.pdf" title="Trends in Maternal Mortality 1990 to 2013">click here</a> to download)</div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><strong>6. </strong><a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/APR_Progress_Report_2013_9_Sept_2013_1.pdf" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/APR_Progress_Report_2013_9_Sept_2013_1.pdf">Committing to Child Survival</a>: A Promise Renewed Progress Report 2013, UNICEF </span></span></p></div><p style="text-align:justify"> </p><p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>5</strong>. Pneumonia Progress Report, 2012, released by IVAC and John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012.pdf" title="Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012.pdf" title="Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012">click here</a> to access</span></p><p style="text-align:justify"> </p><div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>4</strong>. Defeating malaria in Asia, the Pacific, Americas, Middle East and Europe (2012), World Health Organization and PATH, </span></div><p style="text-align:justify"><a href="http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Defeating%20malaria.pdf" title="http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Defeating%20malaria.pdf">http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Defeat<br />ing%20malaria.pdf</a></p><p style="text-align:justify"> </p><p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>3</strong>. WHO Global Report: Mortality Attributable to Tobacco (2012), please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/WHO%20report%20on%20Tobacco.pdf" title="WHO " title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/WHO%20report%20on%20Tobacco.pdf" title="WHO ">click here</a> to access </span></p><p style="text-align:justify"> </p><p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>2</strong>. The Growing Danger of Non-Communicable Diseases: Acting Now to Reverse Course, September, 2011, The World Bank, please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/WBDeepeningCrisis.pdf" title="WBDeepeningCrisis" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/WBDeepeningCrisis.pdf" title="WBDeepeningCrisis">click here</a> to access</span></p><p style="text-align:justify"> </p><p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>1</strong>. National Family Health Survey III (2005-06), please <a href="http://rchiips.org/NFHS/nfhs3.shtml" title="http://rchiips.org/NFHS/nfhs3.shtml">click here</a> to access </span></p><p style="text-align:justify"> </p><p style="text-align:justify">', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 21, 'title' => 'Public Health', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">KEY TRENDS </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <div style="text-align:justify">• The 2019 India TB report says that the country accounted for a quarter of the global tuberculosis (TB) burden with an estimated 27 lakh cases in 2018. In 2018, the country was able to achieve a total notification of 21.5 lakh TB cases, of which 25 percent was from private sector. Majority of the TB burden is among the working age group. Nearly 89 percent of TB cases came from the age group 15-69 years. About 2/3rd of the TB patients were males <strong>*15</strong></div> <div style="text-align:justify"> </div> <div style="text-align:justify">• Maternal Mortality Ratio for India was 370 in 2000, 286 in 2005, 210 in 2010, 158 in 2015 and 145 in 2017. Therefore, the MMRatio for the country reduced by almost 61 percent between 2000 and 2017. MMRatio for China was 59 in 2000, 44 in 2005, 36 in 2010, 30 in 2015 and 29 in 2017. Therefore, the MMRatio for China fell by around 51 percent between 2000 and 2017 <strong>*14</strong> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align:justify">• The per capita public expenditure (actual) on health in nominal terms has gone up from Rs. 621 in 2009-10 to Rs. 1,112 in 2015-16. Public expenditure on health (includes health sector expenditure by Centre and States/UTs) as a percentage of GDP was 1.02 percent in 2015-16. There is no significant change in public expenditure on health as a percentage of GDP since 2009-10. The Centre-State share in total public expenditure on health was 31:69 in 2015-16, which used to be 36:64 in 2009-10 <strong>*13</strong><br /> <br /> • The North-Eastern states had the highest (viz. Rs. 2,878 per capita) and Empowered Action Group (EAG) states (including Assam) had the lowest (viz. Rs. 871 per capita) average per capita public expenditure on health in 2015-16 (excluding UTs). The North-Eastern states had the highest public health expenditure as a percentage of Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP) in 2015-16 (2.76 percent). Public health expenditure as a percentage of GSDP stood at 1.36 percent for EAG states (including Assam) and 0.76 percent for major non-EAG states <strong>*13</strong></div> <div style="text-align:justify"> </div> <div style="text-align:justify">• Of the total disease burden in India in 1990, a tenth was caused by a group of risks including unhealthy diet, high blood pressure, high blood sugar, high cholesterol, and overweight, which mainly contribute to ischaemic heart disease, stroke, and diabetes. The contribution of this group of risks increased massively to a quarter of the total disease burden in India in 2016 <strong>*12</strong><br /> <br /> • The Out-of-Pocket Expenditure (OOPE) on health by households is Rs. 3,02,425 crores (62.6 percent of total health expenditure, 2.4 percent of GDP, Rs. 2,394 per capita) for the year 2014-15. Private Health Insurance expenditure is Rs. 17,755 crores (3.7 percent of total health expenditure) for the year 2014-15 <strong>*11</strong><br /> <br /> • Based on available evidence, cardiovascular disease (24 percent), chronic respiratory disease (11 percent), cancer (6 percent) and diabetes (2 percent) are the leading cause of mortality in India <strong>*10</strong><br /> </div> <div style="text-align:justify">• The total number of dengue cases in India has grown from 28,292 in 2010 to 40,425 in 2014. The total number of dengue related deaths stood at 131 in 2014 <strong>*10</strong></div> <div style="text-align:justify"><br /> • The Proportion (per 1000) of Ailing Persons (PAP), measured as the number of living persons reporting ailments (per 1000 persons), was 89 persons in rural India and 118 persons in urban India <strong>*9</strong><br /> </div> <div style="text-align:justify">• Private doctors were the most important single source of non-hospitalized treatment in both the sectors (Rural & Urban). More than 70% (72 per cent in the rural areas and 79 per cent in the urban areas) spells of ailment were treated in the private sector (consisting of private doctors, nursing homes, private hospitals, charitable institutions, etc.) <strong>*9</strong></div> <div style="text-align:justify"> </div> <div style="text-align:justify">• It is observed that in rural India, 42 percent hospitalised treatment was carried out in public hospital and rest 58 percent in private hospital. For the urban India, the corresponding figures were 32 percent and 68 percent. It may be noted in this context that households (or persons within households) were segregated in sector (rural/urban) by their place of domicile, and not by the place of treatment <strong>*9</strong></div> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <div style="text-align:justify">• Average medical expenditure per hospitalisation case: Higher amount was spent for treatment per hospitalised case by people in the private hospitals (Rs. 25850) than in the public hospitals (Rs. 6120). The highest expenditure was recorded for treatment of Cancer (Rs. 56712) followed by that for Cardio-vascular diseases (Rs. 31647). Average medical expenditure per non-hospitalisation case was Rs. 509 in rural India and Rs. 639 in urban India <strong>*9</strong><br /> <br /> • As much as 86 percent of rural population and 82 percent of urban population were still not covered under any scheme of health expenditure support. Government, however, was able to bring about 12 percent urban and 13 percent rural population under health protection coverage through Rastriya Swasthya Bima Yojana (RSBY) or similar plan. Only 12 percent households of the 5th quintile class (Usual Monthly Per Capita Consumer Expenditure) of urban area had some arrangement of medical insurance from private provider <strong>*9</strong></div> <div style="text-align:justify"> </div> <div style="text-align:justify">• The draft National Health Policy 2015 proposes a potentially achievable target of raising public health expenditure to 2.5% of the GDP. It also notes that 40% of this would need to come from Central expenditures. At current prices, a target of 2.5% of GDP translates to Rs. 3800 per capita, representing an almost four fold increase in five years <strong>*8</strong><br /> <br /> • Maternal mortality ratio (MMR)* in India stood at 560 maternal deaths (per 100000 live births) during 1990, 460 during 1995, 370 during 2000, 280 during 2005 and 190 during 2013. India could reduce MMR by 65 percent between 1990 and 2013<strong> *7</strong><br /> <br /> • At the country level, the two countries that accounted for one third of all global maternal deaths are India at 17 percent (50000) and Nigeria at 14 percent (40000)<strong> *7</strong><br /> <br /> • U5MR in India declined by 55 percent from 126 in 1990 to 56 in 2012. Infant Mortality Rate declined from 88 in 1990 to 44 in 2012. Neonatal mortality rate declined from 51 in 1990 to 31 in 2012. U5MR in India among boys declined from 121 in 1990 to 54 in 2012. U5MR in India among girls declined from 130 in 1990 to 59 in 2012. The share of neonatal deaths in under-five deaths stood at 55 percent in 2012 as compared to 41 percent in 1990 <strong>*6</strong><br /> <br /> • Pneumonia is the leading cause of child mortality in India, responsible for the deaths of nearly 400,000 children under five in 2010 <strong>*5</strong><br /> <br /> • The Indian Commission on Macroeconomics and Health notes that, in India, 13 household person-days per patient were lost per episode of malaria. Furthermore, the commission estimated that the overall monetary losses to families (income losses together with treatment expenses) could amount to between 200 and 400 Indian rupees (US$ 3.5 to 7) <strong>*4</strong><br /> <br /> • Odisha is one of the most highly malaria-endemic states in India, accounting for 24% of reported cases in 2010 despite consisting of less of than 4% of the national population. Malaria is particularly common among tribal groups which represent 44% of the population of Orissa <strong>*4</strong><br /> <br /> • Globally 12% of all deaths among adults aged 30 years and over were attributed to tobacco as compared with 16% in India, 17% in Pakistan and 31% in Bangladesh <strong>*3</strong><br /> <br /> • A recent study illustrated the economic impact of Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs) in India by estimating that if NCDs like: heart disease, cancer, diabetes, chronic respiratory conditions, and other NCDs were “eliminated”, the country’s 2004 GDP would have been 4 to 10 percent greater<strong> *2</strong><br /> <br /> • The share of out-of-pocket household health expenditures on NCDs in India increased from 32 percent to 47 percent between 1995–1996 and 2004. Moreover, 40 percent of these expenditures were financed by borrowing and sales of assets, increasing the household’s financial vulnerability<strong> *2</strong><br /> <br /> • In NFHS-III, 62% of women with two daughters and no sons say they want no more children, compared with 47% in NFHS-II<strong> *1</strong></div> <div> <div style="text-align:justify"> </div> <div style="text-align:justify"> </div> <div style="text-align:justify"><strong>15.</strong> 2019 India TB report, released in 2019, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, please <a href="https://tbcindia.gov.in/WriteReadData/India%20TB%20Report%202019.pdf">click here</a> and <a href="https://tbcindia.gov.in/index1.php?lang=1&level=1&sublinkid=4160&lid=2807">click here</a> to access</div> <div style="text-align:justify"> </div> <div style="text-align:justify"><strong>14.</strong> Trends in Maternal Mortality 2000 to 2017: Estimates by World Health Orgnization (WHO), United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF), World Bank Group, United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) and the United Nations Population Division (released in September 2019), please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Maternal%20mortality%20Levels%20and%20trends%202000%20to%202017%20Executive%20Summary.pdf" title="Maternal mortality Levels and trends 2000 to 2017 Executive Summary">click here</a> and <a href="https://www.unfpa.org/featured-publication/trends-maternal-mortality-2000-2017">click here</a> to access</div> <div style="text-align:justify"> </div> <div style="text-align:justify"><strong>13</strong>. National Health Profile 2018, 13th Issue, Central Bureau of Health Intelligence, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, please <a href="https://im4change.org/docs/900National%20Health%20Profile%202018%2013th%20Issue%20Central%20Bureau%20of%20Health%20Intelligence%20Ministry%20of%20Health%20&%20Family%20Welfare.pdf">click here</a> to access </div> <div style="text-align:justify"> </div> <div style="text-align:justify"><strong>12. </strong>India: Health of the Nation’s States - The India State-Level Disease Burden Initiative, Disease Burden Trends in the States of India 1990 to 2016 (released in October, 2017), prepared by Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), Public Health Foundation of India (PHFI), Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) and Ministry of Health & Family Welfare (MoHFW), please <a href="https://im4change.org/docs/11592India_Health_of.pdf">click here</a> to access</div> <div style="text-align:justify"> </div> <div style="text-align:justify"><strong>11</strong>. National Health Accounts: Estimates for India 2014-15 (released in October, 2017), prepared by the National Health Accounts Technical Secretariat, National Health Systems Resource Centre and Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/National%20Health%20Accounts%20Estimates%20Report%202014-15.pdf" title="National Health Accounts Estimates for India 2014-15">click here</a> to access</div> <div style="text-align:justify"> </div> <div style="text-align:justify"><strong>10</strong>. National Health Profile 2015, Central Bureau of Health Intelligence, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (please <a href="http://www.cbhidghs.nic.in/E-Book%20HTML-2015/index.html">click here</a> to access)</div> <div style="text-align:justify"> </div> <div style="text-align:justify"><strong>9</strong>. 71st round NSS report: Key Indicators of Social Consumption in India-Health (published in June 2015), please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/nss_71st_ki_health_30june15.pdf" title="NSS 71st Round Health">click here</a> to access the full report; please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/NSS%20Press%20Release%20Health.pdf" title="NSS Press Note Health">click here</a> to read the summary of findings</div> <div style="text-align:justify"> </div> <div style="text-align:justify"><strong>8</strong>. Draft National Health Policy 2015 (published in December 2014), Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (Please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Draft%20National%20Health%20Policy%202015.pdf" title="Draft NHP 2015">click here</a> to download)</div> <div style="text-align:justify"> </div> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>7</strong>. United Nations' report (released in May, 2014) entitled Trends in maternal mortality estimates 1990 to 2013, </span>(please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Trends%20in%20Maternal%20Mortality%201990%20to%202013.pdf" title="Trends in Maternal Mortality 1990 to 2013">click here</a> to download)</div> <div style="text-align:justify"> </div> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><strong>6. </strong><a href="tinymce/uploaded/APR_Progress_Report_2013_9_Sept_2013_1.pdf">Committing to Child Survival</a>: A Promise Renewed Progress Report 2013, UNICEF </span></span></p> </div> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>5</strong>. Pneumonia Progress Report, 2012, released by IVAC and John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012.pdf" title="Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012">click here</a> to access</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>4</strong>. Defeating malaria in Asia, the Pacific, Americas, Middle East and Europe (2012), World Health Organization and PATH, </span></div> <p style="text-align:justify"><a href="http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Defeating%20malaria.pdf">http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Defeating%20malaria.pdf</a></p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>3</strong>. WHO Global Report: Mortality Attributable to Tobacco (2012), please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/WHO%20report%20on%20Tobacco.pdf" title="WHO ">click here</a> to access </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>2</strong>. The Growing Danger of Non-Communicable Diseases: Acting Now to Reverse Course, September, 2011, The World Bank, please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/WBDeepeningCrisis.pdf" title="WBDeepeningCrisis">click here</a> to access</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>1</strong>. National Family Health Survey III (2005-06), please <a href="http://rchiips.org/NFHS/nfhs3.shtml">click here</a> to access </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The key findings of the [inside]Global Tuberculosis Report 2022 (released in October 2022)[/inside] by World Health Organization are as follows (please click <a href="/upload/files/Global%20Tuberculosis%20Report%202022.pdf">here</a> and <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022">here</a> to access): </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>India-specific findings</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The case notifications of people newly diagnosed with TB in India were 16,67,136 in 2015, 17,63,876 in 2016, 16,49,694 in 2017, 19,08,683 in 2018, 21,62,323 in 2019, 16,29,301 in 2020, and 19,65,444 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/covid-19-and-tb">click here</a> to access the data. </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Between 2019 and 2020, India witnessed a reduction of 24.65 percent in case notifications of people newly diagnosed with TB. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/covid-19-and-tb ">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Between 2019 and 2021, India faced a reduction of 9.1 percent in case notifications of people newly diagnosed with TB. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/covid-19-and-tb ">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Almost all (90 percent) of the global drop in the number of people newly diagnosed with TB and reported (notified) between 2019 and 2020 was accounted for by 10 countries; the top three, India, Indonesia and the Philippines, accounted for 67 percent. In 2021, 90 percent of the reduction compared with 2019 was accounted for by only five countries. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/covid-19-and-tb ">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Among the 30 high TB burden and 3 global TB watchlist countries, the largest relative reductions in annual notifications between 2019 and 2020 were (ordered according to the size of the relative reduction) in Philippines, Lesotho, Indonesia, Zimbabwe, India, Myanmar and Bangladesh (all >20 percent). In 2021, there was considerable recovery in India, Indonesia and the Philippines, although not to 2019 levels. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/covid-19-and-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• In 2021, eight countries accounted for more than two thirds of global TB cases: India (28 percent), Indonesia (9.2 percent), China (7.4 percent), the Philippines (7.0 percent), Pakistan (5.8 percent), Nigeria (4.4 percent), Bangladesh (3.6 percent) and Democratic Republic of the Congo (2.9 percent). Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-1-tb-incidence">click here</a> to access data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Trends in the TB incidence rate in the 30 high TB burden countries are mixed. Between 2020 and 2021, there were estimated increases in countries with major shortfalls in TB notifications in 2020 and 2021 (e.g. India, Indonesia, Myanmar, Philippines), while in others the previous decline in the TB incidence rate has slowed or stabilized. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-1-tb-incidence">click here</a> to access data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• TB incidence rates for India were 341 per lakh population in 2000, 340 per lakh population in 2001, 339 per lakh population in 2002, 337 per lakh population in 2003, 334 per lakh population in 2004, 329 per lakh population in 2005, 323 per lakh population in 2006, 316 per lakh population in 2007, 309 per lakh population in 2008, 300 per lakh population in 2009, 292 per lakh population in 2010, 284 per lakh population in 2011, 277 per lakh population in 2012, 270 per lakh population in 2013, 263 per lakh population in 2014, 256 per lakh population in 2015, 249 per lakh population in 2016, 234 per lakh population in 2017, 224 per lakh population in 2018, 214 per lakh population in 2019, 204 per lakh population in 2020, and 210 per lakh population in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-1-tb-incidence">click here</a> to access data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• TB case notification rates (of new and relapse cases) for India were 105 per lakh population in 2000, 101 per lakh population in 2001, 97 per lakh population in 2002, 96 per lakh population in 2003, 100 per lakh population in 2004, 100 per lakh population in 2005, 105 per lakh population in 2006, 109 per lakh population in 2007, 110 per lakh population in 2008, 110 per lakh population in 2009, 108 per lakh population in 2010, 105 per lakh population in 2011, 101 per lakh population in 2012, 96 per lakh population in 2013, 123 per lakh population in 2014, 126 per lakh population in 2015, 132 per lakh population in 2016, 122 per lakh population in 2017, 139 per lakh population in 2018, 156 per lakh population in 2019, 117 per lakh population in 2020, and 140 per lakh population in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-1-tb-incidence">click here</a> to access data. </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• In 2021, 82 percent of global TB deaths among HIV-negative people occurred in the WHO African and South-East Asia regions; India alone accounted for 36 percent. The African and South-East Asia regions accounted for 82 percent of the combined total of TB deaths in HIV-negative and HIV-positive people; India accounted for 32 percent. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-2-tb-mortality">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Trends in the number of TB deaths in the 30 high TB burden countries are mixed. Between 2019 and 2021, striking increases are estimated to have occurred in countries with major shortfalls in TB notifications in 2020 and 2021 (e.g. India, Indonesia, Myanmar, Philippines), while in others previous declines have slowed or stabilized. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-2-tb-mortality">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The estimated absolute numbers of TB deaths (HIV-positive and HIV-negative) in India were 7,10,000 in 2000, 7,00,000 in 2001, 6,90,000 in 2002, 6,70,000 in 2003, 6,50,000 in 2004, 6,40,000 in 2005, 6,30,000 in 2006, 6,30,000 in 2007, 5,90,000 in 2008, 5,80,000 in 2009, 5,50,000 in 2010, 5,40,000 in 2011, 5,30,000 in 2012, 5,20,000 in 2013, 4,90,000 in 2014, 4,70,000 in 2015, 4,60,000 in 2016, 4,60,000 in 2017, 4,60,000 in 2018, 4,50,000 in 2019, 4,80,000 in 2020, and 5,10,000 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-2-tb-mortality">click here</a> to access the data.<br /> <br /> • The estimated numbers of incident cases of Multidrug- and rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/RR-TB) were 1,49,000 in 2015, 1,44,000 in 2016, 1,35,000 in 2017, 129,000 in 2018, 123,000 in 2019, 1,17,000 in 2020, and 1,19,000 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-3-drug-resistant-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The countries with the largest share of incident cases of MDR/RR-TB in 2021 were India (26 percent of global cases), the Russian Federation (8.5 percent of global cases) and Pakistan (7.9 percent of global cases). Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2-3-drug-resistant-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• In 2019–2021, the first-ever national survey was completed in India; this was one of the largest surveys to date, with a sample size of about 3,20,000 people. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-disease-burden/2.4-tb-prevalence-surveys">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• In 2020, the first full year of the COVID-19 pandemic, there were particularly large absolute and relative reductions in India, Indonesia and Philippines, followed by some recovery in 2021. </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The number of notifications of people newly diagnosed with TB (new and relapse cases, all forms) was 11,15,718 in 2000, 10,85,075 in 2001, 10,60,951 in 2002, 10,73,282 in 2003, 11,36,182 in 2004, 11,56,248 in 2005, 12,28,827 in 2006, 12,95,943 in 2007, 13,32,267 in 2008, 13,51,913 in 2009, 13,39,866 in 2010, 13,23,949 in 2011, 12,89,836 in 2012, 12,43,905 in 2013, 16,09,547 in 2014, 16,67,136 in 2015, 17,63,876 in 2016, 16,49,694 in 2017, 19,08,683 in 2018, 21,62,323 in 2019, 16,29,301 in 2020, and 19,65,444 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-1-case-notifications ">click here</a> to access the data. </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The number of estimated TB incident cases in India was 36,10,000 in 2000, 36,70,000 in 2001, 37,20,000 in 2002, 37,60,000 in 2003, 37,90,000 in 2004, 38,00,000 in 2005, 37,90,000 in 2006, 37,60,000 in 2007, 37,20,000 in 2008, 36,80,000 in 2009, 36,30,000 in 2010, 35,70,000 in 2011, 35,30,000 in 2012, 34,80,000 in 2013, 34,40,000 in 2014, 33,90,000 in 2015, 33,30,000 in 2016, 31,60,000 in 2017, 30,60,000 in 2018, 29,60,000 in 2019, 28,50,000 in 2020, and 29,50,000 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-1-case-notifications ">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The contribution of public-private mix (PPM) initiatives to total notifications was 2.3 percent in 2010, 0.26 percent in 2011, 0.24 percent in 2012, 6.0 percent in 2013, 12.0 percent in 2014, 11.0 percent in 2015, 17.0 percent in 2016, 23.0 percent in 2017, 26.0 percent in 2018, 28.0 percent in 2019, 31.0 percent in 2020, and 33.0 percent in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-1-case-notifications ">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The percentage of people in India newly diagnosed with pulmonary TB who were bacteriologically confirmed was 35 percent in 2000, 41 percent in 2001, 44 percent in 2002, 49 percent in 2003, 53 percent in 2004, 56 percent in 2005, 58 percent in 2006, 60 percent in 2007, 61 percent in 2008, 62 percent in 2009, 63 percent in 2010, 65 percent in 2011, 66 percent in 2012, 71 percent in 2013, 66 percent in 2014, 64 percent in 2015, 63 percent in 2016, 71 percent in 2017, 57 percent in 2018, 57 percent in 2019, 54 percent in 2020, and 66 percent in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-2-diagnostic-testing-for-tb--hiv-associated-tb-and-drug-resistant-tb">click here</a> to access the data</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The number of WHO-recommended rapid tests used per 1,00,000 population in the case of India was 258 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-2-diagnostic-testing-for-tb--hiv-associated-tb-and-drug-resistant-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The percentage of people in India initially tested for TB with a WHO-recommended rapid test who had a positive test was 24 percent in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-2-diagnostic-testing-for-tb--hiv-associated-tb-and-drug-resistant-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The number of WHO-recommended rapid diagnostic tests per person notified as a TB case (new and relapse cases, all forms) in India was 1.8 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-2-diagnostic-testing-for-tb--hiv-associated-tb-and-drug-resistant-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The estimated TB treatment coverage for India was 67 percent in 2021. The estimated TB treatment coverage among children aged 0–14 years for India was 32 percent in 2021. The estimated TB treatment coverage among children aged >= 15 years for India was 71 percent in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-3-tb-treatment-and-treatment-coverage">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• In 2021, ten countries accounted for 75 percent of the global gap between the estimated number of people who developed TB (incident TB cases) and the number of people who were detected with TB and officially reported. About 60 percent of the global gap was accounted for by five countries: India (24 percent), Indonesia (13 percent), the Philippines (10 percent), Pakistan (6.6 percent) and Nigeria (6.3 percent). Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-3-tb-treatment-and-treatment-coverage">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The estimated coverage of antiretroviral therapy for people living with HIV who developed TB for India 59 percent in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-3-tb-treatment-and-treatment-coverage">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The number of Indian people diagnosed with MDR/RR-TB was 3,288 in 2010, 4,297 in 2011, 17,253 in 2012, 18,888 in 2013, 25,748 in 2014, 28,876 in 2015, 37,258 in 2016, 39,009 in 2017, 58,347 in 2018, 66,255 in 2019, 49,679 in 2020, and 58,837 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-4-drug-resistant-tb-treatment">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The number of Indian people enrolled on MDR/RR-TB was 2,182 in 2010, 3,378 in 2011, 14,117 in 2012, 21,093 in 2013, 24,073 in 2014, 26,966 in 2015, 32,914 in 2016, 35,950 in 2017, 47,284 in 2018, 60,858 in 2019, 42,505 in 2020, and 53,037 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-4-drug-resistant-tb-treatment">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The number of Indian people enrolled on MDR/RR-TB was 2,182 in 2010, 3,378 in 2011, 14,117 in 2012, 21,093 in 2013, 24,073 in 2014, 26,966 in 2015, 32,914 in 2016, 35,950 in 2017, 47,284 in 2018, 60,858 in 2019, 42,505 in 2020, and 53,037 in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-4-drug-resistant-tb-treatment">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The WHO regions with the best treatment coverage are the European Region and the Region of the Americas. Among the 30 high MDR/RR-TB burden countries, those with the best treatment coverage are 2021: Peru, the Russian Federation, Azerbaijan, the Republic of Moldova, India and Kazakhstan. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-4-drug-resistant-tb-treatment">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The estimated treatment coverage for MDR/RR-TB for India was 45 percent in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-diagnosis-treatment/3-4-drug-resistant-tb-treatment">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Seven countries (India, Nigeria, South Africa, Uganda, United Republic of Tanzania, Zambia and Zimbabwe) each reported initiating over 200 000 people with HIV on TB preventive treatment in 2021, accounting collectively for 82 percent of the 2.8 million reported globally. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-prevention">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Since 2014, spending on the diagnosis and treatment of drug-susceptible TB has fallen slightly. Spending on treatment of multidrug and rifampicin-resistant TB (MDR/RR-TB) has increased steadily since 2010: this growth is largely explained by trends in the BRICS group of countries (i.e., Brazil, Russian Federation, India, China and South Africa). Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/financing-for-tb">click here</a> to access the data. </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Bangladesh, Cambodia, China and Zambia are examples of high TB burden countries that have steadily increased domestic funding specifically allocated to NTPs (as opposed to funding allocated more generally for inpatient and outpatient care, including for people with TB) in recent years. There was a considerable reduction in domestic spending in India between 2020 and 2021; one explanation for this was less need for spending on second-line anti-TB drugs in 2021, given stocks that still existed from 2020. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/financing-for-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The international funding (at constant 2021 US$) for national TB programmes on TB prevention, diagnostic and treatment services was 37 million in 2010, 65 million in 2011, 61 million in 2012, 143 million in 2013, 92 million in 2014, 142 million in 2015, 135 million in 2016, 187 million in 2017, 170 million in 2018, 91 million in 2019, 85 million in 2020, and 154 million in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/financing-for-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The domestic funding (at constant 2021 US$) for national TB programmes on TB prevention, diagnostic and treatment services was 56 million in 2010, 60 million in 2011, 44 million in 2012, 85 million in 2013, 162 million in 2014, 132 million in 2015, 139 million in 2016, 305 million in 2017, 348 million in 2018, 365 million in 2019, 326 million in 2020, and 183 million in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/financing-for-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• In the case of India, the sources of funding and funding gaps reported for the TB-specific budgets included in national strategic plans for TB were domestic funding: 66 percent, Global Fund: 29 percent, and international funding (excluding Global Fund): 4.9 percent in 2021. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/financing-for-tb">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The distribution of the two UHC indicators in the 30 high TB burden countries and three global TB watchlist countries shows that, in general, values improve with income level; this is especially evident for the SCI. Nonetheless, the risk of catastrophic health expenditures is high (15 or above) in several middle-income countries, including Angola, Bangladesh, Cambodia, China, India, and Nigeria. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/uhc-tb-determinants/6.1-universal-health-coverage">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• To achieve Universal Health Coverage (UHC), substantial increases in investment in health are critical. From 2000 to 2019 there was a striking increase in health expenditure (from all sources) per capita in a few high TB burden countries, especially the upper-middle-income countries of Brazil, China, South Africa and Thailand. A steady upward trend was evident in Bangladesh, Ethiopia, India, Indonesia, Lesotho, Mongolia, Mozambique, the Philippines and Viet Nam, and there was a noticeable rise from 2012 to 2017 in Myanmar. Elsewhere, however, levels of spending have been relatively stable, and at generally much lower levels. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/uhc-tb-determinants/6.1-universal-health-coverage">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The current health expenditures per capita were US$ 86 in 2000, US$ 96 in 2001, US$ 99 in 2002, US$ 101 in 2003, US$ 109 in 2004, US$ 114 in 2005, US$ 119 in 2006, US$ 126 in 2007, US$ 131 in 2008, US$ 139 in 2009, US$ 141 in 2010, US$ 146 in 2011, US$ 162 in 2012, US$ 190 in 2013, US$ 189 in 2014, US$ 197 in 2015, US$ 205 in 2016, US$ 182 in 2017, US$ 196 in 2018, and US$ 211 in 2019. Kindly <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/uhc-tb-determinants/6.1-universal-health-coverage">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The estimated number of TB cases attributable to alcohol use disorders was 2,58,000, diabetes was 1,05,000, HIV was 93,000, smoking was 1,10,000 and undernourishment was 7,38,000 in 2021. Kindly <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/uhc-tb-determinants/6-3-tb-determinants">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Based on the latest available data in the World Bank database, some upper-middle-income and lower-middle-income countries (e.g. Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, Mongolia, South Africa, Thailand, and Viet Nam) appear to be performing relatively well. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/uhc-tb-determinants/6-3-tb-determinants">click here</a> to access the data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Three new antigen-based skin tests for TB infection that perform better than tuberculin skin tests (particularly in terms of specificity) were evaluated and recommended by WHO in 2022; these are the Cy-Tb skin test, Serum Institute of India, India; C-TST, Anhui Zhifei Longcom Biopharmaceutical Co. Ltd, China; and Diaskintest, JSC Generium, Russian Federation. WHO plans to evaluate the following tests in the coming year: culture-free, targeted-sequencing solutions to test for drug resistance directly from sputum specimens; broth microdilution methods for drug-susceptibility testing (DST); and new IGRAs to test for TB infection. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/tb-research-and-innovation">click here</a> to access the information.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• In India, the Ministry of Health & Family Welfare launched the 21-day TB Mukt Bharat Campaign at Ayushman Bharat Health and Wellness Centres (AB-HWCs), from 24 March to 14 April 2022. The campaign aimed to meaningfully engage community and civil society to build a people’s movement to end TB. It was celebrated across 75 228 AB-HWCs; a total of 6 801 956 people were screened for TB, and 38 328 community awareness activities took place using 21 479 trained TB champions. Linked to this initiative, primary health care teams led by the newly introduced cadre of community health officers (CHOs) provide people-centred TB services to people’s doorsteps. AB-HWCs are playing an important role in improving awareness, identifying TB symptoms at an early stage, offering treatment adherence and psychosocial support to individuals and families with TB, and creating a strong network of TB survivors to strengthen the TB response. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/featured-topics/civil-society-engagement">click here</a> to access the more information.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• WHO has been advancing MAF-TB efforts to strengthen the engagement of the private sector and other public care providers not linked to national TB programmes (NTPs) through a new initiative with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. The initiative promotes the development of enhanced PPM data dashboards in seven priority countries: Bangladesh, India, Indonesia, Kenya, Nigeria, Pakistan and the Philippines. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/featured-topics/maf-tb">click here</a> to get more information.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• India has developed a national multisectoral action framework for TB; this strategic document makes a strong case for transforming India’s TB elimination efforts from a health sector struggle to a whole-of-society responsibility. The framework is a guide for policy-makers and a call to action for communities, civil society, the private sector, and other partners and stakeholders. The overarching goal is to strengthen the country’s capacity for a multisectoral response that facilitates TB elimination by 2025, with the key objective being to achieve policy convergence and adopt a health-in-all approach. The framework highlights the six key strategic areas for integrated action: integrated health care service delivery; TB-free workplaces; socioeconomic support for patients; awareness generation and infection control; corporate social responsibility and investment in TB; and targeted intervention for key affected populations. It defines the list of government ministries and other stakeholders, and the strategic scope of collaboration with each of them. Also, the framework acknowledges the importance of resources for defined strategic areas (e.g. financing, capacity-building, technical resources and research), and calls on partners and governments to mobilize resources for its implementation. Please <a href="https://www.who.int/teams/global-tuberculosis-programme/tb-reports/global-tuberculosis-report-2022/featured-topics/maf-tb">click here</a> to get more information.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The key findings of the report titled [inside]Rural Health Statistics 2020-21 (released in May 2022)[/inside], which has been prepared by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, are as follows (please <a href="/upload/files/Rural%20Health%20Statistics%202020-21.pdf">click here</a> to access):</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• As on 31st March, 2021, there were 1,56,101 and 1,718 Sub Centres (SCs), 25,140 and 5,439 Primary Health Centres (PHCs), and 5,481 and 470 Community Health Centres (CHCs), respectively, which were functioning in rural and urban areas of the country.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The average rural population covered by a Sub Centre was 5,734 as on 1st July, 2021, whereas the norm is that one Sub Centre should be serving a population of size in the range 300-5,000.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The average population in tribal/ hilly/ desert areas covered by a Sub Centre was 3,839 as on 1st July, 2021, whereas the norm is that one Sub Centre should be serving a population of size up to 3,000 in such areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• A Sub Centre is the most peripheral and first contact point between the primary health care system and the community. Sub Centres are assigned tasks relating to interpersonal communication in order to bring about behavioral change and provide services in relation to maternal and child health, family welfare, nutrition, immunisation, diarrhoea control and control of communicable diseases programmes. Each Sub Centre is required to be manned by at least one auxiliary nurse midwife (ANM) / female health worker and one male health worker. Under the National Rural Health Mission (NRHM), there is a provision for one additional second ANM on contract basis. One lady health visitor (LHV) is entrusted with the task of supervision of six Sub Centres. The Government of India bears the salary of ANM and LHV while the salary of the Male Health Worker is borne by the state governments.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The average rural population covered by a Primary Health Centre (PHC) was 35,602 as on 1st July, 2021, whereas the norm is that one PHC should be serving a population of size in the range 20,000-30,000.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The average population in tribal/ hilly/ desert areas covered by a PHC was 25,507 as on 1st July, 2021, whereas the norm is that one PHC should be serving a population of size up to 20,000 in such areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• PHC is the first contact point between the village community and the medical officer. The PHCs were envisaged to provide an integrated curative and preventive health care to the rural population with emphasis on preventive and promotive aspects of health care. The PHCs are established and maintained by the state governments under the Minimum Needs Programme (MNP)/ Basic Minimum Services (BMS) Programme. As per minimum requirement, a PHC is to be manned by a medical officer supported by 14 paramedical and other staff. Under NRHM, there is a provision for two additional staff nurses at PHCs on contract basis. It acts as a referral unit for 6 Sub Centres and has 4-6 beds for patients. The activities of PHC involve curative, preventive, promotive and family welfare services.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The average rural population covered by a Community Health Centre (CHC) was 1,63,298 as on 1st July, 2021, whereas the norm is that one CHC should be serving a population of size in the range 80,000-1,20,000.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The average population in tribal/ hilly/ desert areas covered by a CHC was 1,03,756 as on 1st July, 2021, whereas the norm is that one CHC should be serving a population of size up to 80,000 in such areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• CHCs are being established and maintained by the state government under Minimum Needs Program (MNP)/Basic Minimum Services (BMS) programme. As per minimum norms, a CHC is required to be manned by four medical specialists i.e. surgeon, physician, gynecologist and pediatrician supported by 21 paramedical and other staff. It has 30 indoor beds with one OT, X-ray, labour room and laboratory facilities. It serves as a referral centre for 4 PHCs and also provides facilities for obstetric care and specialist consultations.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Rural Health Care System in India</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Out of the sanctioned posts, a significant percentage of posts were vacant at all the levels. Nearly 21.1 percent of the sanctioned posts of Health Worker (Female)/ Auxiliary Nurse Midwife-ANM (at SCs and PHCs) were vacant as compared to 41.9 percent vacancies of Health Worker (Male) in 2021 at SCs. At PHCs, 64.2 percent of the sanctioned posts of Health Assistant (Male and Female) and 21.8 percent of the sanctioned posts of Doctors were vacant in 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The availability of manpower is one of the important prerequisites for the efficient functioning of the Rural Health services. As on 31st March, 2021, the overall shortfall (which excludes the existing surplus in some of the states) in the posts of Health Worker (Female) / ANM was 2.9 percent of the total requirement as per the norm of one HW(F)/ ANM per Sub Centre and PHC. The overall shortfall was mainly due to shortfall in states of Uttar Pradesh (1,871), Himachal Pradesh (1,253), Gujarat (616), Odisha (397), Tripura (380), and Uttarakhand (252). Similarly, in case of Health Worker (Male), there was a shortfall of 66.1 percent of the requirement. There was a vacancy of 21.1 percent for HW (Female)/ ANM (at SCs and PHCs) as compared to the sanctioned posts. There was a vacancy of 41.9 percent for Health Worker (Male) as compared to the sanctioned posts in 2021 at SCs. At PHCs, 64.2 percent of the sanctioned posts of Health Assistant (Male and Female) and 21.8 percent of the sanctioned posts of Doctors were vacant in 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• PHC is the first contact point between the village community and the Medical Officer. Manpower in PHC includes a Medical Officer supported by paramedical and other staff. In the case of PHC, for Health Assistant (male + female), the shortfall was 72.2 percent. For allopathic doctors at PHC, there was a shortfall of 4.3 percent of the total requirement at the national level. This happened due to a significant shortfall of doctors at PHCs in the states of Odisha (362), Karnataka (340), and Chhattisgarh (271).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The Community Health Centres provide specialised medical care of Surgeons, Obstetricians & Gynecologists, Physicians and Pediatricians. The position of specialists manpower at CHCs as on 31st March, 2021 shows that out of the sanctioned posts, 72.3 percent of Surgeons, 64.2 percent of Obstetricians & Gynecologists, 69.2 percent of physicians, and 67.1 percent of pediatricians were vacant. Overall 68 percent of the sanctioned posts of specialists at CHCs were vacant in rural areas. Moreover, as compared to requirements for existing infrastructure, there was a shortfall of 83.2 percent of Surgeons, 74.2 percent of Obstetricians & Gynecologists, 82.2 percent of Physicians, and 80.6 percent of Pediatricians. Overall, there was a shortfall of 79.9 percent of specialists at the CHCs as compared to the requirement for existing CHCs. The shortfall of specialists was significantly high in most of the states. However, in addition to the specialists, about 17,012 General Duty Medical Officers (GDMOs) Allopathic and 514 AYUSH Specialists along with 2,955 GDMO AYUSH were also available at CHCs as on 31st March, 2021. In addition to this, there were 805 Anaesthetists and 289 Eye Surgeons available at CHCs as on 31st March, 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Comparison of the manpower position of major categories in 2021 with that in 2020 shows an overall increase in the number of ANMs at SCs & PHCs and Doctors at PHCs during the period. However, there was a marginal decrease in the number of Specialists at CHCs. There was an increase of ANMs at SCs & PHCs from 2,12,593 in 2020 to 2,14,820 in 2021 and Doctors at PHCs from 28,516 in 2020 to 31,716 in 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Considering the status of paramedical staff, there was an increase of Lab Technicians from 19,903 in 2020 to 22,723 in 2021 at PHCs and CHCs. There was an increase in the number of pharmacists from 25,792 in 2020 to 28,537 in 2021. A significant increase was also observed for nursing staff under PHC & CHCs from 71,847 in 2020 to 79,044 in 2021. The number of radiographers decreased from 2,434 in 2020 to 2,418 in 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• A total of 1,224 Sub Divisional/ Sub District Hospitals were functioning as on 31st March, 2021 throughout the country. In these hospitals, 15,274 doctors were available. In addition to these doctors, nearly 42,073 paramedical staffs were also available at those hospitals as on 31st March, 2021. The number of doctors in Sub Divisional/ Sub District Hospitals increased from 13,399 in 2020 to 15,274 in 2021. The number of paramedical staff in Sub Divisional/ Sub District Hospitals also went up from 29,937 in 2020 to 42,073 in 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• In addition to the above, 764 District Hospitals (DHs) were also functioning as on 31st March, 2021 throughout the country. There were 26,929 doctors available in the DHs. In addition to the doctors, roughly 90,435 paramedical staff were also available at District Hospitals as on 31st March, 2021. The number of doctors in District Hospitals went up from 22,827 in 2020 to 26,929 in 2021. The number of paramedical staff in District Hospitals increased from 80,920 in 2020 to 90,435 in 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The key findings of the report titled [inside]India TB Report 2022: Coming Together to End TB Altogether (released in March 2022)[/inside], which has been produced by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, are as follows (please <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/TB%20Annual%20Report%202022.pdf">click here</a> to access): </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• As per the Global TB Report 2021, the estimated incidence of all forms of TB in India for the year 2020 was 188 per 100,000 population (129-257 per 100,000 population). </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The total number of incident tuberculosis i.e., TB patients (new and relapse) notified during 2021 was 19,33,381 which was 19 percent higher than that of 2020 (16,28,161). The programme had been able to catch-up with the dip in TB notifications that was observed around the months when the two major covid waves happened in India.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The estimated incidence of all forms of TB in India as per Global TB report was 456 per lakh population in 2010, 437 per lakh population in 2011, 420 per lakh population in 2012, 404 per lakh population in 2013, 350 per lakh population in 2014, 328 per lakh population in 2015, 303 per lakh population in 2016, 286 per lakh population in 2017, 276 per lakh population in 2018, 266 per lakh population in 2019, and 257 per lakh population in 2020. </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The estimated number of Multidrug-resistant (MDR) and Extensively drug-resistant (XDR) TB cases to have been put on treatment as per the global TB report 2021 was 4 per 100,000 and 1 per 100,000 population, respectively. </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• During the pandemic, a significant reduction was observed in the total number of Drug-Resistant TB (DR-TB) patients started on treatment as compared to 2019. In 2020 and 2021, there was a reduction of 14 percent and 9 percent in the number MDR patients put on treatment as compared to the estimated numbers.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The estimated mortality rate among all forms of TB was 37 per 100,000 population (34-40 per 100,000 population) in 2020, as per the Global TB Report 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• There has been a slight increase in the mortality rate due to all forms of TB between 2019 and 2020 by 11 percent in the country. </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• In absolute numbers, the total number of estimated deaths from all forms of TB excluding HIV, for 2020 was 4.93 lakhs (4.53-5.36 lakhs) in the country, which was 13 percent higher that of the year 2019 estimate. </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• As per Nikshay, the total number of reported deaths among Drug sensitive (DS-TB) notified in 2020 was 76,002 (4.3 percent of the total notifications of 2020) which is 15.4 percent of the estimate for the country, thus emphasizing the importance of establishing a “TB Death Surveillance and Response” system in line with the maternal mortality surveillance to improve the coverage and real time resolution of lacunae including the system related factors. </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• A recent systematic review (2020) estimating the direct and indirect patient costs of drug-sensitive and drug-resistant TB care in India reports that 7 to 32 percent of among DS-TB patients and 68 percent of DR-TB were experiencing catastrophic costs for TB care in India.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• In 2021, among 21,35,830 patients diagnosed, 20,30,509 (95 percent) patients were put on treatment. 61 percent were male and 39 percent were female among the patients put on treatment.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Among the total notification, 6 percent patients were in paediatric age group. Among 17,51,437 TB patients notified in 2020, 83 percent were successfully treated while 4 percent died during treatment.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• In 2021, 48,232 MDR/RR-TB patients were diagnosed and 43,380 (90 percent) were put on treatment. 8,455 Pre-XDR-TB, 376 XDR-TB and 13,724 H mono/poly patients were diagnosed and 7,562 (89 percent), 333 (89 percent) and 12,008 (87 percent) were put on treatment respectively.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• A total of 1939 patients were initiated on shorter oral Bdq-containing MDR/RR-TB regimen, 23,889 on longer M/XDR-TB regimen and 25,235 patients were initiated on shorter injection containing MDR-TB regimen.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The cohort of DR-TB patients initiated on treatment in 2019 reported 57 percent treatment success rate (34,535/60,873). This includes 39,358 of patients on shorter MDR-TB regimen (inj-containing) with 59 percent treatment success rate and 1,280 of patient on longer oral regimen with 70 percent treatment success rate. This cohort also includes 11,791 patients put on old conventional MDR-TB regimen that has reported 49 percent treatment success rate.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Available evidence and modelling studies indicate that nearly 20 percent of all TB cases in India may suffer from Diabetes Mellitus (DM). </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Under the National Tuberculosis Elimination Programme (NTEP), in 2021, out of the 74 percent of the known tobacco usage among all TB patients, 12 percent of TB patients were reported to be tobacco users. Among those screened, 30 percent were linked to tobacco cessation services.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Of all the notified TB patients, 95 percent know their HIV status. (Public: 96 percent, Private: 92 percent).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Nearly 95 percent of TB Detection Centres (TDCs) have co-located HIV testing facilities.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• More than 96 percent of People Living With HIV/AIDS (PLHIV) visiting the antiretroviral therapy (ART) centres every month are screened for existing TB symptoms. </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• As per Nikshay data, the linkage of HIV-TB co-infected patients to Cotrimoxazole Preventive Therapy (CPT) and Antiretroviral Therapy in 2021 were 93 percent & 95 percent, respectively.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Kindly click <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/JSA-Press-Statement-UB-2022-23-English-Final.pdf">here</a> and <a href="https://im4change.org/latest-news-updates/union-health-budget-2022-23-has-completely-overlooked-the-lessons-of-the-covid-19-epidemic-says-jan-swasthya-abhiyan.html">here</a> to access the [inside]Press release by Jan Swasthya Abhiyan dated February 2, 2022[/inside] on the Union Health Budget 2022-23.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">---</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The COVID-19 pandemic has devastated families and communities and disrupted societies and economies. Patients had to endure various indignities in both public and private hospitals without protections or recourse to adequate preventive and redressal mechanisms. While the COVID-19 vaccine is seen as a solution to the pandemic, its roll-out has also been rife with inequalities. However, many of the problems we have seen at this time stem from the deep-rooted problems in the public health system. A critical look at India"s health system from the perspective of its patients is overdue.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Oxfam India undertook two rapid surveys on Patient"s Rights Charter and COVID-19 vaccination through self-administered questionnaires, covering 28 states and 5 Union territories; as such, this bears the limitations arising from it being a self-selected sample. The former was done between February and April 2021 and received 3890 responses while the latter was done between August and September 2021 covering 10,955 respondents. Given the distinctive focus of each survey, both are presented separately.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The key findings of the survey on Patient's Rights done for Oxfam India report titled [inside]Securing Rights of Patients in India: Lessons from rapid surveys on peoples’ experiences of Patient’s Rights Charter and the COVID-19 vaccination drive (released on 18 November, 2021)[/inside] are as follows (please <a href="/upload/files/Securing%20Rights%20of%20Patients%20in%20India%20by%20Oxfam%20India.pdf">click here</a> to access): </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• This captures some of the experience of patients with both the public and private healthcare system over the last decade with a focus on the provisions of the Patients "Rights Charter. </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Right to Confidentiality, Human Dignity and Privacy: Over a third of women (35 percent) said that they had to undergo a physical examination by a male practitioner without another female present in the room.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Right to Information: 74 percent of people said that the doctor simply wrote the prescription or treatment or asked them to get tests/ investigations done without explaining their disease, nature and/or cause of illness.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Right to Informed Consent: More than half of the respondents (57 percent) who were themselves/ their relatives had been hospitalised did not receive any information about investigations and tests being done.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Right to Second Opinion: At least a third of respondents who had themselves/ their relatives hospitalised said their doctor did not allow a second opinion.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Right to Non-Discrimination: A third of Muslim respondents and over 20 percent Dalit and Adivasi respondents reported feeling discriminated against on the grounds of their religion or caste in a hospital/ by a healthcare professional.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Right to Choose Source of Obtaining Medicine or Test: 8 in 10 respondents reported being asked to get tests/diagnostics from one place only.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Right to Transparency in Rates and Care According to Prescribed Rates: 58 percent of people of those who had themselves/ their relatives hospitalised, said that they were not provided with an estimated cost of treatment/procedure before the start of treatment/procedure. Three in every 10 people surveyed reported being denied case papers, patient records, investigation reports for treatment/ procedure by the hospital even after requesting the same.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Right to Take Discharge of Patient or Receive Body of Deceased from the Hospital: 19 percent of respondents whose close relatives were hospitalized said that they were denied the release of the dead body by the hospital</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em>The COVID-19 pandemic has deepened existing structural inequalities in the healthcare system. The report recommends:</em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The MoHFW should set up a mechanism to review the present status of adoption of the Patient"s Rights Charter (PRC) in all states and UTs and order its immediate adoption. It should include the PRC in the Clinical Establishment Act (CEA) and issue a letter to the states and Union territories (UTs) for displaying PRC in all private and public hospitals in view of the unprecedented crisis induced by the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly for hospitals taking part in the Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (PMJAY).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The State and UT governments should issue orders to display the PRC in all private and public hospitals irrespective of adoption of CEA and ensure grievance redressal mechanisms for patients, through the appointment of an internal grievance officer within every public and private clinical establishment.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The National Medical Commission should introduce mandatory modules on patients "rights in the healthcare curriculum.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em>Some of the key findings from the survey of the experiences of the vaccination drive were:</em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Eight out of 10 people said that they do not think that the government will be able to vaccinate all adults by December 2021.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• 80 percent of people believed that it is more difficult for a daily wage worker to get the vaccine as compared to a salaried, middle-class person. Most did not think that the experience was equitable.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• With respect to how the government should address inequity in vaccination, some specific suggestions were: </p> <p style="text-align:justify">- 83 percent believed that all vaccination should be done completely free of cost through the government, like previous vaccination drives.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">- Only 2 percent of respondents were in favour of a tax on essentials like fuel to fund the vaccination. 55 percent believed that imposing a one-time tax of 1 percent on the net-worth of India"s richest 1000 families was the best mode of funding.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">- 89 percent of people said that the operational hours of vaccination centres should be expanded beyond 9 AM-5 PM.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">- 95 percent of people from all age categories felt that vaccination must be brought closer to the elderly, persons with disabilities and informal sector workers by making use of mobile vans, vaccination camps and home-based vaccination.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">- 88 percent believed that the government must ensure that marginalized groups such as street dwellers, migrant workers, immigrants, refugees and asylum seekers are given access to<br /> vaccination without having to furnish documentation.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">- Improve information about vaccination. 74 percent of respondents earned less than INR 10,000 per month and over 60 percent of respondents from marginalized and minority communities felt that the government has failed in informing them about how and when to get vaccinated. Eight in 10 felt that the government had been changing its COVID-19 vaccine policies too frequently.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">- 89 percent of people said that the government must do more to ramp vaccine production, especially through public sector companies.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">- The experiences of vaccination show the</p> <p style="text-align:justify">-- Challenges with vaccination:</p> <p style="text-align:justify">---29 percent said that they either had to make multiple visits to the vaccination centre or stand in long queues.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">---22 percent faced issues in booking the slot online or had to try for multiple days ahead to get a slot</p> <p style="text-align:justify">---9 percent people said that they had to lose a day's wages to get themselves vaccinated.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">-- Reason for not getting vaccinated:</p> <p style="text-align:justify">---43 percent respondents stated that they could not get vaccinated because the vaccination centre had run out of vaccines when they visited the centre.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">---12 percent did not get vaccinated because they could not afford the high prices of vaccines.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The lessons from the COVID-19 vaccination drive, would not only help to improve the current response but can derive learnings improving equitable administration of any vaccine in future.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">-All vaccination should continue to be done completely free of cost through the government system; avoid the use of private hospitals to deliver vaccination;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">-Proactively release timely information on vaccination strategies, modalities and accomplishments in disaggregated, user-friendly and open source formats;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">-Prioritise allocation, distribution and administration of vaccines for marginalized, poor, vulnerable, excluded communities first, of course along with for those who are at risk;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">-Maintain record and release disaggregated data on vaccination coverage based on social and economic groups including Dalits(Scheduled Caste), Adivasis(Scheduled Tribes), Muslims, and Persons with Disabilities (PwD);<br /> <br /> -Bring vaccination closer to the vulnerable and extend operational hours of vaccination centres beyond 9 AM-5 PM to allow for vaccination without a loss of wages;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">-Improve information dissemination about vaccination; existing technology-based mechanisms for disseminating information about vaccination centres locations and availability of vaccines is not sufficient. It would be important to build robust and functional grievance redressal mechanisms, from national to local, to address emerging challenges. Adequate flexibility must be given to local health administrations to adapt to local circumstances;</p> <p style="text-align:justify">-Further ramp up vaccine production, especially through the use of public sector companies.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The report titled [inside]'COVID-19 Third Wave Preparedness: Children’s Vulnerability and Recovery' (released on 2nd August, 2021)[/inside] is the outcome of a two-part series of online consultative meetings hosted by National Institute of Disaster Management (NIDM, Delhi). These working group consultative meetings largely included stakeholders from diverse backgrounds -- Central Government, State Governments, Civil Society Organisations (CSOs), social workers, humanitarians, academicians, scientists and researchers. Drawing lessons from the first and second waves, through the deliberations by leading experts during these meetings, the NIDM has been able to produce in the form of final outcome, recommendations for the preparedness of the third wave on the issues related to children and women and their well-being. Kindly <a href="/upload/files/NIDM%20report.pdf">click here</a> to access the report.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The consultative meetings held by NIDM with various stakeholders strongly recommended: a home care model, ramping up of vaccination especially for parents, nurses and other front-line workers, immediate recruitment of healthcare staffs and medical facilities for children, guarantee food security especially for the vulnerable amongst vulnerable, strengthen the community level engagement and risk awareness and communication, zero tolerance towards sexual abuse of children and women and raising awareness through a massive public outreach campaign. There is a huge gap between urban and rural India in terms of awareness, digitisation and medical facilities. It seems like the pandemic outbreak has only exacerbated social inequities and highlighted shortcomings of our society. Hence, the government must prioritise rural India and vulnerable groups in order to cope with the ongoing pandemic. This special report also outlines the women-children complementarity, suggesting that a child’s inclusive growth largely depends on that of the mother.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">---</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> The <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/Inequality%20Report%202021%20Indias%20Unequal%20Healthcare%20Story.pdf">report</a> titled Inequality Report 2021: India's Unequal Healthcare Story examines the status of inequality across various indicators of health among different sections of the population from 2005-06 to 2015-16. The report analyses the government interventions made in terms of health programmes and its impact on health inequality. It also includes ground experiences of people, particularly the marginalised groups, during the pandemic.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The key findings of the [inside]Oxfam India's Inequality Report 2021: India's Unequal Healthcare Story (released on 19th July, 2021)[/inside] are as follows (please <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/Inequality%20Report%202021%20Indias%20Unequal%20Healthcare%20Story.pdf">click here</a> to access): </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Growing socio-economic inequalities in India are disproportionately affecting health outcomes of marginalised groups due to the absence of Universal Health Coverage (UHC), reveals Oxfam <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/Inequality%20Report%202021%20Indias%20Unequal%20Healthcare%20Story.pdf">India’s Inequality Report</a> <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/Inequality%20Report%202021%20Indias%20Unequal%20Healthcare%20Story.pdf">2021: India’s Unequal Healthcare Story</a>.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The new <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/Inequality%20Report%202021%20Indias%20Unequal%20Healthcare%20Story.pdf">report</a> by Oxfam India provides a comprehensive analysis of the health outcomes across different socioeconomic groups to gauge the level of health inequality that persists in the country. The report shows the general category performs better than Scheduled Castes-SCs and Scheduled Tribes-STs; Hindus perform better than Muslims; the rich perform better than the poor; men are better off than women; and the urban population is better off than the rural population on various health indicators. The COVID-19 pandemic has further exacerbated these inequalities.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The public healthcare system in India with its weak and understaffed infrastructure has been overburdened with the consistently rising cases. Private healthcare providers, on the other hand, were charging exorbitant prices, preventing the middle-class and the poor from getting diagnosed and treated until the government intervened to cap their prices. Even then, private healthcare has remained inaccessible to the poor while the rich have easily availed its services. As such, the poor and the vulnerable have mostly been dependent on the overburdened public healthcare facilities — with insufficient number of beds and inadequate human resources — for treatment or have gone without being diagnosed and treated.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Health inequalities are linked to and reflect socio-economic inequalities. Often times, it is the socio-economically marginalised communities that suffer from ill-health the most. The ongoing pandemic has revealed that the health systems in most countries are under-prepared to cope with any major health emergency and its unequal impact on the have and the have-nots.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Over the last few decades, India has made great progress in healthcare provisioning. Yet, progressively, the trend has been towards supporting the growth of the private sector in healthcare. This growth has only exacerbated the existing inequalities leaving the poor and the marginalised with no viable healthcare provisions. High costs of health services and lack of quality leads to further impoverishment of the disadvantaged.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The private health sector provided only 5-10 percent of total patient care when India gained independence. Today, it accounts for 66 percent of hospitalization and non-hospitalization cases and 33 percent of institutional births. This growth has been boosted by government concessions and has attracted domestic and foreign companies to set up tertiary care and super speciality hospitals. Within the country, the private formal sector has a distinct customer base. They are the urban-rich. Dehury et al. writes that private hospitals ‘cater to a pool of patient community having health insurance, corporate tie-ups and referrals from general physicians. Usually, the paying capacity of these patients [are] higher than the common Indian citizen…these hospitals cater to the Indian elite class and organized sector workers having all financial protection.’</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The private sector is geared towards profits whereas the public provisioning of health services ensures that the poor and the marginalised have equal access to quality healthcare services closer to home. India’s public health provisioning has, however, been weak. The public expenditure on health by the central government as a percentage of GDP was a mere 0.32 percent in 2019-20.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The combined expenditure by state and central government was about 1.16 percent of the GDP in 2019, rising marginally by 0.02 percent from 2018 — falling far behind the goal of making health expenditure 2.5 percent of the GDP. The per capita health expenditure is highest in Arunachal Pradesh at INR 9,854 and lowest in Bihar at INR 697. In the 2021-22 budget, the health ministry has been allocated a total of INR 76,901 crore, a decline of 9.8 percent from the revised estimates of 2020-21 at INR 85,250 crore. </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Public funds for health has also been invested specifically in secondary and tertiary care rather than in the provisioning of primary healthcare. </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The public sector has prioritized secondary and tertiary care over primary care. Yet, experts acknowledge that primary care is the cornerstone of achieving equitable delivery and access to quality healthcare by all. While focus has been put on achieving Universal Healthcare in India; the government has selectively adopted the insurance model as a way to universalise healthcare instead of enhancing the primary health care system. As such, access to good quality public healthcare has remained fragmented and India is still far away from achieving universal coverage. The rich can avail healthcare from high-end private providers but the poor are stuck with a difficult choice. They either have to incur debts by availing health care from private providers or depend on a poor public healthcare system.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The Planning Commission in 2011 had observed that expenditure in secondary and tertiary care was drawing away attention from primary health services. Research studies substantiate this position and it is argued that ‘[s]ubstantial proportions of the health budgets have been spent on…high-end tertiary medical services — all of which largely benefits the middle classes and detracts from the provision of public health services.’ Studies have also attributed India’s high disease burden to the government’s exclusive focus on the urban-oriented curative medical model. The government’s focus on ‘a heavily medicalized and hightech curative medical interventions’ has derailed the goal to make quality and affordable public healthcare accessible to all irrespective of their ability to pay. The result has been a widening of health inequalities along caste, class, gender and geography.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• To make the goals of National Health Mission (NRHM and National Urban Health Mission were subsumed under the NHM in 2013) a reality, there needs to be a strong public health infrastructure in place, even in hard-to-reach areas. Sufficient medical supplies, equipment, drugs and trained medical staff in health centres should be the standard. On the contrary, public health centres remain understaffed with limited supplies.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Among other things, the Inequality Report 2021 on health has recommended the government to increase health spending to 2.5 percent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) to ensure a more equitable health system in the country; ensure that union budgetary allocation in health for SCs and STs is proportionate to their population; prioritize primary health by ensuring that two-thirds of the health budget is allocated for strengthening primary healthcare; state governments to allocate their expenditure on health to 2.5 percent of Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP); the centre should extend financial support to the states with low per capita health expenditure to reduce inter-state inequality in health. It has asked to widen the ambit of insurance schemes to include out-patient care. The major expenditures on health happen through out-patient costs as consultations, diagnostic tests, medicines, etc. While the report does not endorse Government-financed Health Insurance Schemes (GFHIS) as a way to achieve UHC and stresses that insurance can only be a component of it, it is imperative that GFHIS widens its ambit to include outpatient costs as a way to reduce out-of-pocket expenditure (OOPE).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The Constitution of India does not guarantee a fundamental right to health though it does refer to the role of the government in the provisioning of healthcare to all its citizens. Therefore, the right to health should be enacted as a fundamental right that makes it obligatory for the government to ensure equal access to timely, acceptable, and affordable healthcare of appropriate quality, and address the underlying determinants of health to close the gap in health outcomes between the rich and poor.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• With the lockdown aimed at checking the spread of COVID-19, health systems prioritized services related only to COVID-19. Human and material resources like hospitals, beds and intensive care units were diverted towards the management and treatment of COVID-19 patients. Health services catering to non-Covid illnesses were halted, leading to unprecedented hardships and sufferings for chronic patients and those requiring immediate medical intervention such as pregnant women. Accessibility to non-Covid medical services were grimmer for patients in rural and hard-to-reach areas as compared to urban areas due to the unavailability of health centres in the vicinity and the lack of transportation facilities.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Disruptions in the availability of drugs for non-communicable diseases (NCD), tuberculosis (TB), contraceptive and other essential services were also reported. Telemedicine — the practice of caring for patients remotely — for which guidelines were issued by the Government of India in March 2020 to facilitate access to medical advice made consultations easier. However, for those with no smart phones and internet connectivity, particularly in rural and hard-to-reach areas, seeking medical advice remained a difficult task. The immunization drive was also disrupted. India vaccinates around 20 million children every year and its disruption might add to the largest number of unimmunized children in the world. </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The National Health Profile in 2017 recorded one government allopathic doctor for every 10,189 people and one state-run hospital for every 90,343 people. India also ranks the lowest in the number of hospital beds per thousand population among the BRICS nations — Russia scores the highest (7.12), followed by China (4.3), South Africa (2.3), Brazil (2.1) and India (0.5). India also ranks lower than some of the lesser developed countries such as Bangladesh (0.87), Chile (2.11) and Mexico (0.98).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The current expenditure on health, by the Centre and the state governments combined, is only about 1.25 percent of GDP which is the lowest among the BRICS countries — Brazil (9.2) has the highest allocation, followed by South Africa (8.1), Russia (5.3) and China (5.0). It is also lower than some of its neighbouring countries such as Bhutan (2.5 percent) and Sri Lanka (1.6 percent). The low priority given to health expenditure is also reflected in the share in total expenditure of the government, which is only 4 percent whereas the global average stands at 11 percent. In Oxfam’s Commitment to Reducing Inequality Report 2020, India ranks 154th in health spending, fifth from the bottom. This poor spending is reflected in the inadequate health resources and infrastructure. Only around 50,069 health and wellness centres (HWCs), which are envisaged to deliver comprehensive primary healthcare (CPHC) closer to homes, are functional. These centres are only 65 percent of the cumulative target for 2020-21. Moreover, in 2019, less than 10 percent of PHCs were funded as per IPHS norms whereas the rest remained underfunded. </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Different studies have proved that low public health expenditure yields worse health outcomes. Studies by Barenberg et al. investigated the impact of public health expenditure on Infant Mortality Rate (IMR) and found a negative relationship between the two. Farahani et al. evaluated the relationship between state-level public health spending of India and individual mortality across all age groups using household-level data from the third National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3) showing that a 10 percent increase in public spending on health decreases mortality by about 2 percent, with effects mainly concentrated on women, the young, and the elderly.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The out-of-pocket health expenditure of 64.2 percent in India is higher than the world average of 18.2 percent. Exorbitant prices of healthcare has forced many to sell household assets and incur debts.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The global average for life expectancy is 72.6 years but India (69.42) remains below the global average. It is also lower than the neighbouring countries Nepal (70.8), Bhutan (71.8), Bangladesh (72.6), and Sri Lanka (77) and its BRICS counterparts Brazil (75.9), China (76.9), and Russia (72.6).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• A comprehensive provisioning of public health as water, sanitation and primary healthcare is the most efficient and cost-effective way to achieve UHC around the world.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Evidence from Thailand and Sri Lanka, which have performed better than India with regard to universal access to healthcare, shows that these countries have a high public provisioning of services. Also, evidence from developed countries like Germany, Sweden, Canada and developing countries like Costa Rica reveal that successful insurance-based healthcare system was attained with high levels of public spending and government provisioning of healthcare services.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The Oxfam India <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/Inequality%20Report%202021%20Indias%20Unequal%20Healthcare%20Story.pdf">report</a> says that ‘Kerala invested in infrastructure to create a multi-layered health system, designed to provide first-contact access for basic services at the community level and expanded integrated primary healthcare coverage to achieve access to a range of preventive and curative services…[,] expanded the number of medical facilities, hospital beds, and doctors…[and] public health and social development initiatives… aided in creating the environment for a strong and effective primary care system.’</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="/upload/files/SOPonCOVID19Containment%26ManagementinPeriurbanRural%26tribalareas.pdf">click here</a> to access the [inside]Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) on COVID-19 Containment and Management in Peri-urban, Rural and Tribal areas[/inside] dated 16th May, 2021. The SOP was issued by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>---</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">The key findings of the report titled [inside]Rural Health Statistics 2019-20 (released in April 2021)[/inside], which has been prepared by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, are as follows (please <a href="/upload/files/Rural%20Health%20Statistics%202019-20%20report%20MoHFW%20latest%20available%282%29.pdf">click here</a> to access):</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• As on 31st March, 2020, there were 1,55,404 and 2,517 Sub Centres (SCs), 24,918 and 5,895 Primary Health Centres (PHCs) and 5,183 and 466 Community Health Centres (CHCs), respectively, which were functioning in rural and urban areas of the country.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The average rural population covered by a Sub Centre was 5,729 as on 1st July, 2020, whereas the norm is that one Sub Centre should be serving a population of size in the range 300-5,000.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The average population in tribal/ hilly/ desert areas covered by a Sub Centre was 3,381 as on 1st July, 2020, whereas the norm is that one Sub Centre should be serving a population of size up to 3,000 in such areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• A Sub Centre is the most peripheral and first contact point between the primary health care system and the community. Sub Centres are assigned tasks relating to interpersonal communication in order to bring about behavioral change and provide services in relation to maternal and child health, family welfare, nutrition, immunisation, diarrhoea control and control of communicable diseases programmes. Each Sub Centre is required to be manned by at least one auxiliary nurse midwife (ANM) / female health worker and one male health worker. Under the National Rural Health Mission (NRHM), there is a provision for one additional second ANM on contract basis. One lady health visitor (LHV) is entrusted with the task of supervision of six Sub Centres. The Government of India bears the salary of ANM and LHV while the salary of the Male Health Worker is borne by the state governments.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The average rural population covered by a Primary Health Centre (PHC) was 35,730 as on 1st July, 2020, whereas the norm is that one Primary Health Centre should be serving a population of size in the range 20,000-30,000.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The average population in tribal/ hilly/ desert areas covered by a PHC was 23,930 as on 1st July, 2020, whereas the norm is that one PHC should be serving a population of size up to 20,000 in such areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• PHC is the first contact point between the village community and the medical officer. The PHCs were envisaged to provide an integrated curative and preventive health care to the rural population with emphasis on preventive and promotive aspects of health care. The PHCs are established and maintained by the state governments under the Minimum Needs Programme (MNP)/ Basic Minimum Services (BMS) Programme. As per minimum requirement, a PHC is to be manned by a medical officer supported by 14 paramedical and other staff. Under NRHM, there is a provision for two additional staff nurses at PHCs on contract basis. It acts as a referral unit for 6 Sub Centres and has 4-6 beds for patients. The activities of PHC involve curative, preventive, promotive and family welfare services.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The average rural population covered by a Community Health Centre was 1,71,779 as on 1st July, 2020, whereas the norm is that one Community Health Centre should be serving a population of size in the range 80,000-1,20,000.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The average population in tribal/ hilly/ desert areas covered by a CHC was 97,178 as on 1st July, 2020, whereas the norm is that one CHC should be serving a population of size up to 80,000 in such areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• CHCs are being established and maintained by the state government under Minimum Needs Program (MNP)/Basic Minimum Services (BMS) programme. As per minimum norms, a CHC is required to be manned by four medical specialists i.e. surgeon, physician, gynecologist and pediatrician supported by 21 paramedical and other staff. It has 30 indoor beds with one OT, X-ray, labour room and laboratory facilities. It serves as a referral centre for 4 PHCs and also provides facilities for obstetric care and specialist consultations.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em>Rural Health Care System in India</em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Out of the sanctioned posts, a significant percentage of posts were vacant at all the levels. Nearly 14.1 percent of the sanctioned posts of Health Worker (Female)/ ANM (at SCs +PHCs) were vacant as compared to 37 percent vacancies of Health Worker (Male) in 2020. At PHCs, 37.6 percent of the sanctioned posts of Health Assistant (Male + Female) and 24.1 percent of the sanctioned posts of Doctors were vacant in 2020.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The availability of manpower is one of the important prerequisites for the efficient functioning of the Rural Health services. As on 31st March, 2020, the overall shortfall (which excludes the existing surplus in some of the states) in the posts of Health Worker (Female) / ANM was 2 percent of the total requirement as per the norm of one HW(F)/ ANM per Sub Centre and PHC. The overall shortfall was mainly due to the shortfall in states of Gujarat (1073), Himachal Pradesh (992), Rajasthan (657), Tripura (389) and Kerala (277). Similarly, in case of Health Worker (Male), there was a shortfall of 65.5 percent of the requirement.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• PHC is the first contact point between the village community and the Medical Officer. Manpower in PHC includes a Medical Officer supported by paramedical and other staff. In the case of PHC, for Health Assistant (male + female), the shortfall was 71.9 percent. For allopathic doctors at PHC, there was a shortfall of 6.8 percent of the total requirement at all India level. This shortfall happened due to a significant shortfall of doctors at PHCs in the states of Odisha (461), Chhattisgarh (404), Rajasthan (249), Madhya Pradesh (134), Uttar Pradesh (121) and Karnataka (105).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The Community Health Centres provide specialised medical care of Surgeons, Obstetricians & Gynecologists, Physicians and Pediatricians. The latest available position of specialists manpower at CHCs as on 31st March, 2020 shows that out of the sanctioned posts, 68.4 percent of Surgeons, 56.1 percent of Obstetricians & Gynecologists, 66.8 percent of physicians and 63.1 percent of pediatricians were vacant. Overall 63.3 percent of the sanctioned posts of specialists at CHCs were vacant. Moreover, as compared to requirements for existing infrastructure, there was a shortfall of 78.9 percent of Surgeons, 69.7 percent of Obstetricians & Gynecologists, 78.2 percent of Physicians and 78.2 percent of Pediatricians. Overall, there was a shortfall of 76.1 percent of specialists at the CHCs as compared to the requirement for existing CHCs. The shortfall of specialists was significantly high in most of the states. However, in addition to the specialists, about 15,342 General Duty Medical Officers (GDMOs) Allopathic and 702 AYUSH Specialists along with 2,720 GDMO AYUSH were also available at CHCs as on 31st March, 2020. In addition to this, there were 890 Anaesthetists and 301 Eye Surgeons available at CHCs as on 31st March, 2020.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Comparison of the manpower position of major categories in 2020 with that in 2019 shows an overall decrease in the number of ANMs at SCs & PHCs and Doctors at PHCs during the period. However, there was an increase in the number of Specialists at CHCs. The number of Specialists at CHCs had increased from 3,881 in 2019 to 4,857 in 2020, which was an increase of 27.7 percent.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Considering the status of paramedical staff, there was an increase of Lab Technicians from 18,715 in 2019 to 19,903 in 2020 at PHCs and CHCs. There was a marginal decrease in the number of pharmacists from 26,204 in 2019 to 25,792 in 2020. A significant decrease was also observed in nursing staff under PHC & CHCs from 80,976 in 2019 to 71,847 in 2020. The number of radiographers had increased marginally from 2,419 in 2019 to 2,434 in 2020.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• A total of 1,193 Sub Divisional/ Sub District Hospitals were functioning as on 31st March, 2020 throughout the country. In these hospitals, 13,399 doctors were available. In addition to these doctors, about 29,937 paramedical staff were also available at those hospitals as on 31st March, 2020. The number of doctors in Sub Divisional/ Sub District Hospitals had reduced from 13,750 in 2019 to 13,399 in 2020. The number of paramedical staff in Sub Divisional/ Sub District Hospitals fell from 36,909 in 2019 to 29,937 in 2020.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• In addition to above, 810 District Hospitals (DHs) were also functioning as on 31st March, 2020 throughout the country. There were 22,827 doctors available in the DHs. In addition to the doctors, about 80,920 paramedical staff were also available at District Hospitals as on 31st March, 2020. The number of doctors in District Hospitals went down from 24,676 in 2019 to 22,827 in 2020. The number of paramedical staff in District Hospitals fell from 85,194 in 2019 to 80,920 in 2020.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• As per the Health & Wellness Centre (HWC) portal data, there were a total of 38,595 HWCs functional in India as on 31st March 2020. In total, 18,610 SCs had been converted into HWC-SCs. Also at the level of PHC, a total of 19,985 PHCs had been converted into HWC-PHCs. Out of 19,985 HWC-PHCs, 16,635 PHCs had been converted into HWCs in rural areas and 3,350 in urban areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">**page**</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">Kindly <a href="/upload/files/LASI_India_Factsheet.pdf">click here</a> to access the [inside]India Fact Sheet of Longitudinal Ageing Study in India (LASI) -- Wave-1 (released in 2021)[/inside], An Investigation of Health, Economic, and Social Well-being of India’s Growing Elderly Population, India Report 2020, prepared by International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), National Programme for Health Care Elderly (NPHCE), Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health (HSPH), University of Southern California (USC) and Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MoHFW).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="/upload/files/LASI_India_Executive_Summary.pdf">click here</a> to read the [inside]Executive Summary of Longitudinal Ageing Study in India (LASI) -- Wave-1 (released in 2021)[/inside].</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>---</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to the report entitled [inside]A Neglected Tragedy: The global burden of stillbirths -- Report of the UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation, 2020 (released in October 2020)[/inside] (please click <a href="https://www.im4change.org/upload/files/UN-IGME-the-global-burden-of-stillbirths-2020.pdf">here</a> to access):</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• About one stillbirth occurs every 16 seconds, which means that every year, about 2 million babies are stillborn i.e. showing no signs of life at birth. It means every day, almost 5,400 babies are stillborn. Globally, one in 72 babies is stillborn.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• In the past two decades, 48 million babies were stillborn. Three-in-four stillbirths occur in sub-Saharan Africa or Southern Asia. Low and lower-middle income countries account for 84 percent of all stillbirths but only 62 percent of all live births.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Stillbirths are largely absent in worldwide data tracking, rendering the true extent of the problem hidden. They are invisible in policies and programmes and underfinanced as an area requiring intervention. Targets specific to stillbirths were absent from the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and are still missing in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• There are a variety of reasons behind the slow reduction in stillbirth rates: absence of or poor quality of care during pregnancy and birth; lack of investment in preventative interventions and the health workforce; inadequate social recognition of stillbirths as a burden on families; measurement challenges and major data gaps; absence of global and national leadership; and no established global targets, such as the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Globally, an estimated 42 percent of all stillbirths are intrapartum (i.e., the baby died during labour); almost all of these 832,000 stillborn deaths that occurred in 2019 could have been prevented with access to high-quality care during childbirth, including ongoing intrapartum monitoring and timely intervention in case of complications.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Around 20 million babies are projected to be stillborn in the next decade, if trends observed between 2000 and 2019 in reducing the stillbirth rate continue. Among the 20 million, 2.9 million stillbirths could be prevented by accelerating progress to meet the ENAP target in the 56 countries at risk to miss the goal. Every Newborn Action Plan (ENAP) calls for each country to achieve a rate of 12 stillbirths or fewer per 1,000 total births by 2030 and to close equity gaps.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• In the first two decades of this century (i.e. 2000-2019), the annual rate of reduction (ARR) in the stillbirth rate was just -2.3 percent, compared to a -2.9 percent reduction in neonatal mortality and -4.3 percent among children aged 1–59 months. Meanwhile, between 2000 and 2017, maternal mortality decreased by -2.9 percent.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• In the year 2000, the ratio of the number of stillbirths to the number of under-five deaths was 0.30; by 2019, it had increased to 0.38. So, stillbirths are an increasingly critical global health problem.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• National stillbirth rates around the globe ranged from 1.4 to 32.2 stillbirths per 1,000 total births in 2019. Sub-Saharan Africa, followed by Southern Asia, had the highest stillbirth rate and the greatest number of stillbirths.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Six countries bore the burden of half of all stillbirths of the world – India, Pakistan, Nigeria, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, China and Ethiopia, in order of burden (highest to lowest).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Nearly 3,40,622 of the 19,66,000 stillbirths globally in 2019 were in India, making it the country with the largest such burden (i.e. 17.33 percent).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• In 2019, India, Pakistan and Nigeria alone accounted for one-third of the total burden of stillbirths and 27 percent of live births.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Stillbirth rate is defined as the ratio of the number of still births per 1,000 live births and stillbirths taken together (i.e. total births).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Some progress has been made in preventing stillbirths. Globally, the stillbirth rate declined by 35 percent since 2000. Since 2000, the stillbirth rate declined by 44 percent in Central and Southern Asia, 53 percent in India, 52 percent in Kazakhstan and 44 percent in Nepal.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Among the lower-middle income countries, stillbirth rate fell by 39 percent since 2000. Since the year 2000, stillbirth rate in lower-middle income countries like Mongolia, India and El Salvador declined by 57 percent, 53 percent and 50 percent, respectively.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• A total of 14 countries – including three low- and lower middle income countries (Cambodia, India, Mongolia) – slashed the stillbirth rate by more than half during 2000-2019.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The top 15 countries with the greatest percentage decline in the stillbirth rate during 2000–2019 are China (63 percent), Turkey (63 percent), Georgia (62 percent), North Macedonia (62 percent), Belarus (60 percent), Mongolia (57 percent), Netherlands (55 percent), Azerbaijan (53 percent), Estonia (53 percent), India (53 percent), Kazakhstan (52 percent), Romania (52 percent), El Salvador (50 percent), Peru (48 percent) and Latvia (46 percent).<br /> <br /> • India's stillbirth rate (i.e. (stillbirths per 1,000 total births) in 2000 was 29.6, in 2010 was 20.2 and in 2019 was 13.9. The percentage decline in India's stillbirth rate during 2000–2019 was -53.0 percent. The annual rate of reduction (ARR) in stillbirth rate during 2000-2019 was -4.0 percent.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The total number of stillbirths in India was 852,386 in 2000, 535,683 in 2010 and 340,622 in 2019. The percentage decline in stillbirths during 2000–2019 was -60.0 percent. The annual rate of reduction (ARR) in total number of stillbirths during 2000–2019 was -4.8 percent. India witnessed 24,116,000 livebirths and 24,457,000 total births in 2019. </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Women in sub-Saharan Africa and Southern Asia bear the greatest burden of stillbirths in the world. More than three quarters of estimated stillbirths in 2019 occurred in these two regions, with 42 percent of the global total in sub-Saharan Africa and 34 percent in Southern Asia.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• In 2019, stillbirth rate per 1,000 total births in Afghanistan was 28.4 (total stillbirth in 2019: 35,384), Bangladesh was 24.3 (total stillbirth in 2019: 72,508), Bhutan was 9.7 (total stillbirth in 2019: 127), China was 5.5 (total stillbirth in 2019: 92,170), India was 13.9 (total stillbirth in 2019: 340,622), Maldives was 5.8 (total stillbirth in 2019: 41), Myanmar was 14.1 (total stillbirth in 2019: 13,493), Nepal was 17.5 (total stillbirth in 2019: 9,997), Pakistan was 30.6 (total stillbirth in 2019: 190,483) and Sri Lanka was 5.8 (total stillbirth in 2019: 1,943).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Data are essential to understanding the burden of stillbirths and identifying where, when and why they occur.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Immediate actions are needed to strengthen data systems and their ability to collect, analyses and use timely, quality and disaggregated stillbirth data. To improve stillbirth data availability and quality, it is recommended that countries and relevant stakeholders:</p> <p style="text-align:justify">a. Align the stillbirth definition and measures with international standards<br /> b. Integrate stillbirth-specific components within relevant plans for data system strengthening and improvement<br /> c. Record stillbirth outcomes in all relevant maternal and newborn health programs, including routine HMIS (registers and monthly reporting forms)<br /> d. Provide training and support to include stillbirths within civil and vital registration systems as the coverage of these systems increases<br /> e. Include information on timing of stillbirth (antepartum or intrapartum) in all settings and record causes and contributing factors to stillbirth where possible<br /> f. Report and review stillbirth data locally – at facility or district level – alongside data on neonatal deaths (by day of death) to reduce incentives for misreporting of outcomes, and to monitor potential misclassification.<br /> g. Collate reported stillbirth rate data up the data system to a national level to enable tracking of progress towards the ENAP target of 12 stillbirths or fewer per 1,000 total births in every country by 2030 and to enable monitoring of geographical inequities.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Ending preventable stillbirths is among the core goals of the UN’s Global Strategy for Women’s, Children’s and Adolescents’ Health (2016–2030) and the Every Newborn Action Plan (ENAP). These global initiatives aim to reduce the stillbirth rate to 12 or fewer third trimester (late) stillbirths per 1,000 total births in every country by 2030.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The stillbirth rate (SBR) is defined as the number of babies born with no signs of life at 28 weeks or more of gestation, per 1,000 total births. The stillbirth rate is calculated as: SBR = 1000 * {sb/(sb+lb)}, where 'sb' refers to the number of stillbirths ≥ 28 weeks or more of gestational age; and 'lb' refers to the number of live births regardless of gestational age or birthweight.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> <strong><em>[Shivangini Piplani, who is doing her MA in Finance and Investment (1st year) from Berlin School of Business and Innovation, assisted the Inclusive Media for Change team in preparing the summary of 'A Neglected Tragedy: The global burden of stillbirths -- Report of the UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation, 2020.' She did this work as part of her winter internship at the Inclusive Media for Change project in December 2020.]</em></strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> The Sample Registration System (SRS) is carried out by the Office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner, India with the goal of providing accurate annual estimates of birth rates, death rates, child mortality rates and many other indices of pregnancy and fertility and mortality. The SRS has been providing data for the estimation of various mortality measures since its inception. The report provides mortality indices at the national and state levels, as well as death rates at the sub-state, viz. NSS Natural Division Level. </p> <p style="text-align:justify">The key findings of [inside]Sample Registration System Statistical Report 2018 (released in June 2020)[/inside], published by the Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, are as follows (please <a href="/upload/files/SRS_Statistical_Report_2018.pdf"><span style="background-color:#ffffff">click here</span></a> to access):</p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Crude Death Rate (CDR)</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Crude Death Rate (CDR), which is defined as the number of deaths in a year per thousand population, at the national level, stood at 6.2 in 2018. It was 6.7 in rural areas and 5.1 in urban areas. For all bigger states/ UTs, except West Bengal, the CDR in rural areas was higher than that in urban areas. For West Bengal, CDR in rural (CDR 5.6) and urban (CDR 5.7) areas were almost identical, which makes the state the closest to the Line of Equity vis-à-vis other states/ UTs.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• States that exhibited large differences between urban CDR and rural CDR in 2018 were: Telangana (3 points), Punjab (2.6), Tamil Nadu (2.5), Andhra Pradesh (2.4), Karnataka (2.4), Chhattisgarh (2.3 points) and Himachal Pradesh (2.3). The difference is calculated as Rural CDR - Urban CDR = Difference in CDRs.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The top 5 states with the highest CDRs in 2018 were: Chhattisgarh (8.0), Odisha (7.3), Kerala (6.9), Himachal Pradesh (6.9) and Andhra Pradesh (6.7).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Between the periods 2006-08 and 2016-18, the average CDR at the national level changed by –14.9 percentage points. Between the above-said time points, CDR declined for all states, except Kerala, which showed an increase of 6 percentage points possibly due to the changes in age structure of its population.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Infant Mortality Rate (IMR)</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Infant Mortality Rate (IMR) is defined as the number of infant (less than one year of age) deaths per one thousand live births during the year.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• IMR has seen a substantial decline over the years, from 129 per 1000 live births in 1971 to 110 in 1981 and from 80 in 1991 to 32 in 2018.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• At the national level, IMR was 36.8 in rural areas and 22.9 in urban areas during the period 2016-18. However, IMR was 36 in rural areas and 23 in urban areas in 2018.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• In 2018, Kerala had the lowest IMR of 7 and Madhya Pradesh had the highest IMR of 48.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• In 2018, at the national level, IMR among male infants stood at 32, while that for female infants it was 33.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• For the year 2018, in all states except Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Delhi, Gujarat, Haryana, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Odisha, Punjab, Tamil Nadu, Telangana and Uttarakhand, female infants experienced a higher mortality rate as compared to male infants.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• In 2018, Jharkhand had the highest difference between male IMR (27) and female IMR (34), followed by Bihar with a large difference between male IMR (30) and female IMR (35). As opposed to that, in Madhya Pradesh male IMR (51) exceeded female IMR (46).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• In 2018, Assam witnessed the highest inequity between rural and urban IMRs with its rural IMR at 44 and urban IMR at 20. States like West Bengal (Urban IMR 20, Rural IMR 22), Punjab (Urban IMR 19, Rural IMR 21), Uttarakhand (Urban IMR 29, Rural IMR 31) and Bihar (Urban IMR 30, Rural IMR 32) had the least inequity between rural and urban IMR.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Between 2006-08 and 2016-18, the average IMR declined by -40.3 percent. In rural areas, decline in IMR between the above-said time points ranged from -63.9 percentage points in Delhi to -32.2 percentage points in Chhattisgarh. The highest fall in IMR in urban areas between the above-said time points was noticed in Delhi i.e. -56.4 percent.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Neonatal Mortality Rate</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Neo-natal Mortality Rate (NMR) is defined as the number of infant (less than 29 days) deaths per one thousand live births during the year.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• In 2018, at the national level, NMR was 23, while in rural and urban areas, they were 27 and 14, respectively.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• In 2018, NMR was the lowest in Kerala at 5 and highest in Madhya Pradesh at 35.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• At the national level, the percentage of neo-natal deaths to total infant deaths was 71.7 percent in 2018, and it was 60.1 percent in urban areas and 74.4 percent in rural areas. It means that most infants die when they are not even 30 days old.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Perinatal Mortality Rate</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Peri-natal mortality rate (PMR) is defined as the number of still births and infant deaths of less than 7 days per 1,000 live births (LB) and still births (SB) taken together during the year.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• At the national level, PMR has been estimated to be 22 in 2018. It was 25 in rural areas and 14 in urban areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• In 2018, Madhya Pradesh had the highest PMR at 30 and Kerala had the lowest PMR at 10.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Still Birth Rate</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Still Birth Rate (SBR) is defined as the ratio of the number of still births per one thousand live births and still births taken together.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• At the national level, the SBR has been estimated to be 4 in 2018.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• In 2018, the highest SBR has been estimated for Odisha (10) and lowest have been estimated for Jammu and Kashmir and Jharkhand (i.e. 1 each).</p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Under-five Mortality Rate (U5MR)</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Under-five Mortality Rate (U5MR) is the probability of dying between birth and exactly age 5, expressed per 1,000 live births.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• At the national level, U5MR has been estimated to be 36 in 2018. In urban areas, the U5MR in 2018 has been estimated to be 26 while in rural areas, it has been estimated to be 40.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Estimated U5MR was the lowest in Kerala at 10 and was the highest in Madhya Pradesh at 56.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• At the national level, female U5MR (37) was higher than the male U5MR (36) in 2018.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• In 2018, female U5MRs were higher than that of male U5MR in all states except in Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Delhi, Gujarat, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Odisha, Punjab, Tamil Nadu and Uttarakhand.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Age-Specific Mortality Rates (ASMR)</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Age-specific Mortality Rate (ASMR), is defined as the number of deaths in a particular age-group per thousand population of the same age-group during the year.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong><em>5-14 Age Group</em></strong><br /> <br /> • At the national level, the ASDR for the 5-14 age group has been estimated to be 0.5 in 2018.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• In 2018, the lowest ASDR for the 5-14 age group was found for Kerala and Assam (0.2 each) and the highest ASDR for the 5-14 age group was observed in case of Bihar, Odisha, Madhya and Chhattisgarh (0.7 each).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• At the national level, although ASDR for the 5-14 age group was the same for males and females in urban areas (0.4 each), ASDR for the 5-14 age group among females was 0.6 and among males was 0.5 in rural areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong><em>15-59 Age Group</em></strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">• At the national level, ASDR for the 15-59 age group has been estimated to be 3.2 in rural areas and 2.3 in urban areas. At the national level, the ASDR for the 15-59 age group was 2.9 in 2018.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• In 2018, the female ASDR for the 15-59 age group was lower than that of male ASDR for the 15-59 age group in all the states.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong><em>60 and Above Age Group</em></strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">• At the national level, ASDR for the 60 and above age group has been estimated to be 42.6.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• ASDR for the 60 and above age group among males (45.9) was greater than that among females (39.5). The same trend existed for rural and urban areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• ASDR for the 60 and above age group has been estimated to be the highest in Chhattisgarh (58.9) and lowest in Delhi (28.3).</p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Sex Ratio at Birth (SRB)</strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Sex Ratio at Birth (SRB) is defined as the number of female births per 1000 male births during the year.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The 3 years’ average of SRB (in the period 2016-18) has been estimated to be 899. At the national level, it was 900 in rural areas and 897 in urban areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• For 2016-18, the average SRB was the highest in Chhattisgarh at 958 and it was the lowest in Uttarakhand at 840.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• In rural areas, Chhattisgarh had the highest SRB of 976 and Haryana had the lowest SRB of 840 in the period 2016-18. </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• In urban areas, Madhya Pradesh had the highest SRB of 968 and Uttarakhand had the lowest SRB at 810 in the period 2016-18.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong><em>[Meghana Myadam and Sakhi Arun Jagdale, who are doing their MA in Development Studies (1st year) from Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Hyderabad, assisted the Inclusive Media for Change team in preparing the summary of the report by the Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner<em>.</em> They did this work as part of their summer internship at the Inclusive Media for Change project in July 2020.]</em></strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="/upload/files/FAQ.pdf">click here</a> to access the [inside]FAQ on COVID-19 prepared by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare[/inside].</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="/upload/files/Containment%20Plan%20for%20Large%20Outbreaks%20of%20COVID19%20Final.pdf">click here</a> to access the [inside]Containment Plan for Large Outbreaks Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019[/inside] (COVID-19), which has been prepared by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">---</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/Background-Paper-COVID19.pdf">click here</a> to read the [inside]Background Note on COVID-19[/inside], which was prepared by Jan Swasthya Abhiyan (JSA) and All India People’s Science Network(AIPSN), dated 16th March, 2020.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="https://im4change.org/upload/files/Statement-COVID19.pdf">click here</a> to read the [inside]Statement on the COVID-19 pandemic[/inside], which was released by Jan Swasthya Abhiyan (JSA) and All India People’s Science Network(AIPSN) on 16th March, 2020.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">---</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/High%20Level%20group%20of%20Health%20Sector.pdf" title="High Level group of Health Sector">click here</a> to access the Report of the [inside]High Level Group on Health Sector (2019), submitted to the Fifteenth Finance Commission of India[/inside]. The members of the High Level Group on Health were Dr. Randeep Guleria, Dr. Devi Shetty, Dr. Dileep Govind Mhaisekar, Dr. Naresh Trehan, Dr. Bhabatosh Biswas and Prof. K Srinath Reddy. </p> <p style="text-align:justify">---</p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Press%20Note%20NSS%2075th%20Round%20Report%20Key%20Indicators%20of%20Social%20Consumption%20in%20India%20Health%20July%202017%20to%20June%202018%20released%20on%2023rd%20November%202019.pdf" title="Press Note NSS 75th Round Report Key Indicators of Social Consumption in India Health July 2017 to June 2018 released on 23rd November 2019">click here</a> to access the major findings of [inside]NSS 75th Round Report: Key Indicators of Social Consumption in India: Health, July 2017 to June 2018 (released on 23rd November 2019)[/inside].<br /> <br /> Kindly <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Key%20Indicators%20of%20Social%20Consumption%20in%20India%20Health.pdf" title="Key Indicators of Social Consumption in India Health">click here</a> to access the NSS 75th Round Report: Key Indicators of Social Consumption in India: Health, July 2017 to June 2018 (released on 23rd November 2019).</p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <div style="text-align:justify">The key findings of the [inside]2019 India TB report (released in September 2019)[/inside], which has been produced by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, are as follows (please <a href="https://tbcindia.gov.in/WriteReadData/India%20TB%20Report%202019.pdf">click here</a> and <a href="https://tbcindia.gov.in/index1.php?lang=1&level=1&sublinkid=4160&lid=2807">click here</a> to access):</div> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> • The country accounted for a quarter of the global tuberculosis (TB) burden with an estimated 27 lakh cases in 2018.<br /> <br /> • In 2018, the country was able to achieve a total notification of 21.5 lakh TB cases, of which 25 percent was from private sector. Majority of the TB burden is among the working age group. Nearly 89 percent of TB cases came from the age group 15-69 years. About two-third of the TB patients were males.<br /> <br /> • Among the notified, treatment was initiated for about 19.1 lakh cases (almost 90 percent), across both public and private sectors.<br /> <br /> • HIV co-infection among TB patient was nearly fifty thousand cases amounting to TB-HIV co-infection rate of 3.4 percent.<br /> <br /> • In 2018, TB notification has increased to 5.37 lakhs. This is an increase by 35 percent in notification from private sector in comparison to 2017.<br /> <br /> • Based on private drug sales data, it could be said that in 2016 there was about 1.59 times patients in the private sector as compared to the public sector (approximately 22.7 lakh patients in total).<br /> <br /> • In India about 80 percent of the outpatient care is provided by private health care providers. Considering the quantum of private sector, it necessitates to leverage their capacity to expand health coverage.<br /> <br /> • TB is a notifiable disease vide 2012 as per declaration of Government of India Order. This has expanded the ambit of TB surveillance covering all public as well as private health facilities. The healthcare providers shall notify every TB cases to local authorities such as District Health Officers/ Chief Medical Officers of a district and Municipal Health Officer of a municipal corporation. This notification should be done every month. The surveillance begins with the notification, and completed with acting on the information gathered. In <a href="tinymce/uploaded/TB%20notification%20Gazette%20of%20India%20dated%2019%20March%202018.pdf" title="TB notification Gazette of India dated 19 March 2018">March 2018</a>, the notification was published in Gazette of India, making it mandatory for private providers to notify TB patients and public health system to act upon it.<br /> <br /> • Uttar Pradesh, with 17 percent of population of the country, is the largest contributor to TB cases, with 20 percent of the total notifications, accounting for about 4.2 lakh cases (187 cases per lakh population).<br /> <br /> • Delhi and Chandigarh stand apart from all other states and UTs with regard to notification rates relative to their resident population. Annual notification rates in Delhi and Chandigarh were 504 cases per lakh population and 496 cases per lakh population, respectively. This is because patients residing in other parts of the country are diagnosed/ notified from these two UTs.<br /> <br /> • In 2018, the Revised National Tuberculosis Control Programme (RNTCP) notified 21.5 lakh TB cases, a 16 percent increase over 2017.<br /> <br /> • The largest ever National Drug Resistance Survey in the world for 13 anti-TB drugs has been completed and it has indicated about 6.2 percent prevalence of drug resistant TB in the country among all TB patients.<br /> <br /> • The Government of India is prioritising resource allocations for TB in the country with more than Rs. 12,000 crores being invested in the implementation of the National Strategic Plan to End TB 2017-2025. The government has started the Nikshay Poshan Yojana (NPY) for nutritional support to TB patients. <br /> <br /> • It is expected that the country would be able to cover all TB cases through the online notification system -- NIKSHAY.<br /> </p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify">The ending preventable maternal mortality (EPMM) target for reducing the global maternal mortality ratio (MMRatio) by 2030 was adopted as Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) target 3.1: reduce global MMRatio to less than 70 per lakh live births by 2030. Having targets for mortality reduction is important, but accurate measurement of maternal mortality remains challenging and many deaths still go uncounted. Many countries still lack well-functioning civil registration and vital statistics (CRVS) systems, and where such systems do exist, reporting errors – whether incompleteness (unregistered deaths, also known as “missing”) or misclassification of cause of death – continue to pose a major challenge to data accuracy. The report entitled 'Trends in Maternal Mortality 2000 to 2017: Estimates by World Health Orgnization (WHO), United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF), World Bank Group, United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) and the United Nations Population Division presents internationally comparable global, regional and country-level estimates and trends for maternal mortality between 2000 and 2017.<br /> <br /> The new estimates presented in this report supersede all previously published estimates for years that fall within the same time period. Care should be taken to use only these estimates for the interpretation of trends in maternal mortality from 2000 to 2017; due to modifications in methodology and data availability, differences between these and previous estimates should not be interpreted as representing time trends. In addition, when interpreting changes in MMRatios over time, one should take into consideration that it is easier to reduce the MMRatio when the level is high than when the MMRatio level is already low.<br /> <br /> Please note that Maternal Mortality Ratio is the number of women who die from pregnancy-related causes while pregnant or within 42 days of pregnancy termination per 100,000 live births.<br /> <br /> The key findings of the report entitled [inside]Trends in Maternal Mortality 2000 to 2017: Estimates by WHO, UNICEF, World Bank Group, UNFPA and the United Nations Population Division (released in September 2019)[/inside] are as follows (please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Maternal%20mortality%20Levels%20and%20trends%202000%20to%202017%20Executive%20Summary.pdf" title="Maternal mortality Levels and trends 2000 to 2017 Executive Summary">click here</a> and <a href="https://www.unfpa.org/featured-publication/trends-maternal-mortality-2000-2017">click here</a> to access): <br /> <br /> • Nigeria and India had the highest estimated numbers of maternal deaths, accounting for approximately one-third (35 percent) of estimated global maternal deaths in 2017, with approximately 67,000 and 35,000 maternal deaths (23 percent and 12 percent of global maternal deaths), respectively.<br /> <br /> • Maternal Mortality Ratio for India was 370 in 2000, 286 in 2005, 210 in 2010, 158 in 2015 and 145 in 2017. So, the MMRatio for the country reduced by almost 61 percent between 2000 and 2017.<br /> <br /> • MMRatio for China was 59 in 2000, 44 in 2005, 36 in 2010, 30 in 2015 and 29 in 2017. Hence, the MMRatio for China reduced by around 51 percent between 2000 and 2017. <br /> <br /> • The absolute difference in MMRatio between India and China has lessened from 311 in 2000 to 116 in 2017. The country's MMRatio was 6.3 times that of China in 2000, which has reduced to 5 times in 2017.<br /> <br /> • MMRatio for Bangladesh was 434 in 2000, 343 in 2005, 258 in 2010, 200 in 2015 and 173 in 2017. Therefore, the MMRatio for Bangladesh decreased by nearly 60 percent between 2000 and 2017. <br /> <br /> • The absolute gap in MMRatio between Bangladesh and India has reduced from 64 in 2000 to 28 in 2017.<br /> <br /> • MMRatio for Sri Lanka was 56 in 2000, 45 in 2005, 38 in 2010, 36 in 2015 and 36 in 2017. So, the MMRatio for Sri Lanka reduced by roughly 36 percent between 2000 and 2017. <br /> <br /> • MMRatio for Pakistan was 286 in 2000, 237 in 2005, 191 in 2010, 154 in 2015 and 140 in 2017. Therefore, the MMRatio for Pakistan declined by roughly 51 percent between 2000 and 2017. </p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• MMRatio for South Asia was 395 in 2000, 309 in 2005, 235 in 2010, 179 in 2015 and 163 in 2017. Hence, the MMRatio for South Asia reduced by around 59 percent between 2000 and 2017. </p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Sub-Saharan Africa and Southern Asia accounted for approximately 86 percent (2,54,000) of the estimated global maternal deaths in 2017 with sub-Saharan Africa alone accounting for roughly 66 percent (1,96,000), while Southern Asia accounted for nearly 20 percent (58,000). South-Eastern Asia, in addition, accounted for over 5 percent of global maternal deaths (16,000).<br /> </p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to the [inside]National Health Profile 2018, 13th Issue[/inside], Central Bureau of Health Intelligence, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare (please <a href="https://im4change.org/docs/900National%20Health%20Profile%202018%2013th%20Issue%20Central%20Bureau%20of%20Health%20Intelligence%20Ministry%20of%20Health%20&%20Family%20Welfare.pdf">click here</a> to access):<br /> <br /> <strong>Demographic Indicators</strong><br /> <br /> • The Infant Mortality Rate (IMR) per 1,000 live births has declined considerably from 74 infant deaths in 1994 to 34 infant deaths in 2016. There is a huge gap between IMR in rural areas (38 infant deaths per 1,000 live births) and urban areas (23 infant deaths per 1000 live births).<br /> <br /> • Among the states, the lowest IMR per 1,000 live births in 2016 was found in Goa (8), followed by Kerala (10) and Manipur (11). The highest IMR per 1,000 live births in 2015 was found in Madhya Pradesh (47), followed by both Assam and Odisha (44 each).</p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The life expectancy of life at birth has increased from 49.7 years in 1970-75 to 68.3 years in 2011-15. In the period 2011-15, the life expectancy for females was 70.0 years and 66.9 years for males.<br /> <br /> • In the period 2011-15, the life expectancy in the rural areas was 67.1 years and in the urban areas it was 71.9 years.<br /> <br /> • The Maternal Mortality Ratio (MMRatio) per 1,00,000 livebirths has decreased from 178 maternal deaths during 2010-12 to 167 maternal deaths during 2011-13. In 2011-13, the MMRatio per 1,00,000 livebirths was the highest in Assam i.e. 300 maternal deaths and lowest in Kerala i.e. 61 maternal deaths.<br /> <br /> • The country's birth rate per 1,000 estimated mid-year population has fallen from 29.5 livebirths in 1991 to 20.4 livebirths in 2016. Birth rate per 1,000 estimated mid-year population in rural areas was 22.1 livebirths and in urban areas it was 17.0 livebirths in 2016.<br /> <br /> • India's natural growth rate per 1,000 mid-year population has declined from 19.7 in 1991 to 14.0 in 2016.<br /> <br /> • The proportion of urban population to India's total population has increased from 25.7 percent in 1991 to 27.81 percent in 2001, and further increased to 31.14 in 2011.<br /> <br /> • The country's population density has increased from 267 persons per square kilometer in 1991 to 325 persons per square kilometer in 2001, and further rose to 382 persons per square kilometer in 2011.<br /> <br /> • The decadal growth rate of India's population has fallen from 23.87 percent in 1981-1991 to 21.54 percent in 1991-2001, and further declined to 17.7 percent in 2001-2011.<br /> <br /> <strong>Health Status Indicators</strong><br /> <br /> • In 2017, maximum number of malaria cases was reported in Odisha (3,52,140 cases) and maximum number of deaths was reported in West Bengal (29 deaths).<br /> <br /> • The total number of cases of malaria has changed from 8,81,730 in 2013 to 8,42,095 in 2017. The total number of deaths due to malaria has changed from 440 in 2013 to 104 in 2017.<br /> <br /> • Out of the overall cases of Kala-azar reported in 2017, 72 percent of the cases were reported in Bihar. The total number of cases of Kala-azar has fallen from 13,869 in 2013 to 5,758 in 2017. Likewise, the total number of deaths from Kala-azar has fallen from 20 in 2013 to zero in 2017.<br /> <br /> • There has been a considerable fall in the number of swine flu cases/ deaths in the year 2014 (viz. 937) as compared with 2012 (viz. 5,044) & 2013 (viz. 5,253). However, the number of cases (42,592) and deaths (2,990) have drastically increased in the year 2015. In 2016, the cases decreased to 1786 and again increased to 38,811 in 2017.<br /> <br /> • A total of 63,679 cases of chikungunya were reported in 2017 as compared with 64,057 cases in 2016. Most chikungunya cases in 2017 were reported from Karnataka (32,170), followed by Gujarat (7,807) and Maharashtra (7,639).<br /> <br /> • The total number of cases and deaths due to chicken pox were 74,035 and 92, respectively in 2017. Kerala accounted for maximum number of cases (30,941) and West Bengal accounted for maximum number of deaths (53) due to chicken pox in 2017. <br /> <br /> • The total number of cases of Acute Encephalitis Syndrome has increased from 7,825 in 2013 to 13,036 in 2017. The total number of deaths due to Acute Encephalitis Syndrome has decreased from 1,273 in 2013 to 1,010 in 2017. Uttar Pradesh reported maximum numbers of cases (4,749) and maximum number of deaths (593) in 2017.<br /> <br /> • The total number of cases of Japanese Encephalitis has almost doubled from 1,086 in 2013 to 2,180 in 2017. The total number of deaths due to Japanese Encephalitis has increased from 202 in 2013 to 252 in 2017. Uttar Pradesh reported maximum numbers of cases (693) and maximum number of deaths (93) in 2017.<br /> <br /> • The total number of cases and deaths due to encephalitis were 12,485 and 626, respectively in 2017. Assam accounted for maximum number of cases (5,525) and Uttar Pradesh accounted for maximum number of deaths (246) due to chicken pox in 2017.<br /> <br /> • The total number of cases and deaths due to viral meningitis were 7,559 and 121, respectively in 2017. Andhra Pradesh accounted for maximum number of cases (1,493) and maximum number of deaths (33) due to viral meningitis in 2017.<br /> <br /> • The total number of cases of dengue has almost doubled from 75,808 in 2013 to 1,57,996 in 2017. The total number of deaths due to dengue has increased from 193 in 2013 to 253 in 2017. Tamil Nadu reported maximum numbers of cases (23,294) and maximum number of deaths (65) in 2017.<br /> <br /> • As per the National Programme for Prevention and Control of Cancer, Diabetes, Cardiovascular Diseases and Stroke (NPCDCS), out of 3,57,23,660 patients who attended non-communicable disease (NCD) clinics in 2017, 8.41 percent people are diagnosed with diabetes, 10.22 percent are diagnosed with hypertension (high blood pressure), 0.37% are diagnosed with cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), 0.13 percent are diagnosed with stroke and 0.11 percent are diagnosed with common cancers (including oral, cervical and breast cancer).<br /> <br /> • During the year 2015, the lives of 4,13,457 and 1,33,623 people are cut short as a result of accidental and suicide cases, respectively. Many more people suffer non-fatal injuries, with many incurring a disability as a result of their injury.<br /> <br /> • Suicide rates are increasing significantly for young adults including male, female & transgender in a wider population. The maximum number of suicide cases (44,593) is reported between the age-group 30-45 years. <br /> <br /> • The total number of disabled persons in India is 26,814,994 as per the Census 2011.<br /> <br /> • The total number of cases and deaths due to snake bite were 1,42,366 and 948 respectively in 2017.<br /> <br /> <strong>Health Financing in India</strong><br /> <br /> • The total public expenditure on health for the year 2015-16 stood at Rs 1.4 lakh crores (actual).<br /> <br /> • The per capita public expenditure (actual) on health in nominal terms has gone up from Rs. 621 in 2009-10 to Rs. 1,112 in 2015-16.<br /> <br /> • Public expenditure on health (includes health sector expenditure by Centre and States/UTs) as a percentage of GDP was 1.02 percent in 2015-16. There is no significant change in public expenditure on health as a percentage of GDP since 2009-10.<br /> <br /> • The Centre-State share in total public expenditure on health was 31:69 in 2015-16, which used to be 36:64 in 2009-10.<br /> <br /> • The total public expenditure on health (excluding other Central Ministries) in 2015-16 was Rs. 1,40,054 crores, with Medical and Public Health comprising the major share (78.7 percent). The share of Family Welfare was 12.6 percent.<br /> <br /> • Urban and rural health services constituted 71 percent of the public expenditure on medical and public health in 2015-16.<br /> <br /> • The North-Eastern states had the highest (viz. Rs. 2,878 per capita) and Empowered Action Group (EAG) states (including Assam) had the lowest (viz. Rs. 871 per capita) average per capita public expenditure on health in 2015-16 (excluding UTs). For example, in Mizoram the per capita health expenditure was Rs. 5862 (actual) in 2015-16. However, in Bihar, the per capita health expenditure was Rs. 491 (actual) in 2015-16.<br /> <br /> • The North-Eastern states had the highest public health expenditure as a percentage of Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP) in 2015-16 (2.76 percent). Public health expenditure as a percentage of GSDP stood at 1.36 percent for EAG states (including Assam) and 0.76 percent for major non-EAG states.<br /> <br /> • Based on the Health Survey (71st round) conducted by National Sample Service Office (NSSO), the average medical expenditure incurred during stay at hospital between January, 2013 and June, 2014 was Rs. 14,935 for rural and Rs. 24,436 for urban India.<br /> <br /> • The average total medical expenditure per child birth as in-patient over the last 365 days (survey conducted from January to June 2014) in a public hospital in rural areas was Rs. 1,587 and in urban areas is Rs. 2,117.<br /> <br /> • Around 43 crore individuals were covered under any health insurance in the year 2016-17. This amounts to 34 percent of the total population of India. Almost 79 percent of them were covered by public insurance companies. <br /> <br /> • Overall, 77 percent of all persons covered with insurance fall under Government-sponsored schemes.<br /> <br /> • Public insurance companies had a higher share of coverage and premium for all types of health insurance policies, except family floater policies including individual policies.<br /> <br /> • Compared to countries that have either Universal Health Coverage or moving towards it, India’s per capita public spending on health is low.<br /> <br /> <strong>Human Resources in Health Sector</strong><br /> <br /> • The number of registered allopathic doctors possessing recognized medical qualifications (under Indian Medical Council Act) and registered with state medical council for the years 2016 and 2017 were 25,282 and 17,982, respectively. Upto 2017, the total number of doctors possessing recognised medical qualifications (under the IMC Act) registered with the State Medical Councils/ Medical Council of India is 10,41,395. <br /> <br /> • In 2017, the average population served per government allopathic doctor was 11,082. The state having the highest average population served per government allopathic doctor in 2017 was Bihar (28,391), followed by Uttar Pradesh (19,962) and Jharkhand (18,518). <br /> <br /> • In 2017, the average population served per government dental surgeon was 1,76,004. The state having the highest average population served per government dental surgeon in 2017 was Chhattisgarh (25,87,900), followed by Maharashtra (14,83,150) and Uttar Pradesh (11,41,869).<br /> <br /> • The number of dental surgeon registered with Central/ State Dental Councils of India has increased from 93,332 in 2008 to 2,51,207 as on 31st December, 2017.<br /> <br /> • Over the years with gaining popularity, there is a steady rise in total number of registered AYUSH doctors in India from 7,71,468 in 2016 to 7,73,668 in 2017.<br /> <br /> • There was a total of 8,41,279 Auxilliary Nurse Midwives (ANMs) serving in the country as on 31st December, 2016.<br /> <br /> • As on 31st December, 2016, the highest number of registered ANMs among the states were found in Andhra Pradesh (1,38,435), followed by Rajasthan (1,08,688) and Odisha (62,159).<br /> <br /> • There are 19,80,536 Registered Nurses and Registered Midwives (RN & RM) and 56,367 Lady Health Visitors (LHV) serving in the country as on 31st December, 2016.<br /> <br /> • As on 31st December, 2016, the highest number of registered RN & RM among the states were found in Tamil Nadu (2,62,718), followed by Kerala (2,46,161) and Andhra Pradesh (2,32,621).<br /> <br /> • As on 13th November, 2017, the total number of registered pharmacists operating in the country is 9,07,132.<br /> <br /> • As on 13th November, 2017, the highest number of registered pharmacists among the states were found in Maharashtra (2,03,089), followed by Gujarat (1,19,445) and Andhra Pradesh (1,15,754).<br /> <br /> • In rural areas, the total number of allopathic doctors at primary health centres (PHCs) was 27,124 as on 31st March, 2017.<br /> <br /> • As on 31st March, 2017, among the states, the highest number of allopathic doctors at PHCs was found in Maharashtra (2,929), followed by Tamil Nadu (2,759) and Rajasthan (2,382).<br /> <br /> • In rural areas, the total number of specialists at community health centres (CHCs) is 4,156 as on 31st March, 2017.<br /> <br /> • As on 31st March, 2017, among the states, the highest number of specialists at CHCs is found in Maharashtra (508), followed by Karnataka (498) and Rajasthan (497).<br /> <br /> <strong>Health Infrastructure</strong><br /> <br /> • Medical education infrastructures in the country have shown rapid growth during the last 26 years. The country has 476 medical colleges, 313 dental colleges for Bachelor of Dental Surgery (BDS) & 249 dental colleges for Master of Dental Surgery (MDS). There has been a total admission of 52,646 in 476 Medical Colleges and 27,060 in BDS and 6,233 in MDS during 2017-18.<br /> <br /> • The total number of dental colleges for BDS has increased from 77 in 1994-95 to 313 in 2017-18 viz. by 4.1 times. The total number of dental colleges for MDS has increased from 32 in 1994-95 to 249 in 2017-18 viz. by 7.8 times.<br /> <br /> • The total number of admission in dental colleges for BDS has risen from 1,987 in 1994-95 to 27,060 in 2017-18 viz. by 13.6 times. The total number of admission in dental colleges for MDS has risen from 225 in 1994-95 to 6,233 in 2017-18 viz. 27.7 times.<br /> <br /> • The total number of medical colleges in India has increased from 146 in 1991-92 to 476 in 2017-18 viz. by 3.3 times.<br /> <br /> • The total number of male students taking admissions in medical colleges has gone up from 7,468 in 1991-92 to 26,082 in 2017-18 viz. by 3.5 times. The total number of female students taking admissions in medical colleges has gone up from 4,731 in 1991-92 to 26,564 in 2017-18 viz. by 5.6 times.<br /> <br /> • India has 3,215 institutions producing 1,29,926 General Nurse Midwives annually and 777 colleges for Pharmacy (Diploma) with an intake capacity of 46,795 as on 31st October, 2017.<br /> <br /> • There are 23,582 government hospitals having 7,10,761 beds in the country. It means that there is just one bed for 1,826 Indians in government hospitals, assuming that the projected population in 2018 being 129,80,41,000 as on 1st March, 2018.<br /> <br /> • Around 19,810 government hospitals are in rural areas with 2,79,588 beds and 3,772 government hospitals are in urban areas with 4,31,173 beds.<br /> <br /> • As on 31st March, 2017, there were 1,56,231 sub-centres, 25,650 primary health centres (PHCs) and 5,624 community health centres (CHCs).<br /> <br /> • As on 31st March, 2017, most sub-centres were found in Uttar Pradesh (20,521), followed by Rajasthan (14,406) and Maharashtra (10,580). <br /> <br /> • As on 31st March, 2017, most PHCs were found in Uttar Pradesh (3,621), followed by Karnataka (2,359) and Rajasthan (2,079). <br /> <br /> • As on 31st March, 2017, most CHCs were found in Uttar Pradesh (822), followed by Rajasthan (579) and Tamil Nadu (385).<br /> <br /> • Medical care facilities under AYUSH by management status i.e. dispensaries & hospitals were 27,698 and 3,943 respectively, as on 1st April, 2017.<br /> <br /> • The total number of licensed blood banks in the country till June, 2017 was 2,903. The highest number of blood banks are found in Maharashtra (328), followed by Uttar Pradesh (294) and Tamil Nadu (291). <br /> <br /> • In total, there were 469 eye banks (362 privately run and 107 government run) in the country as on 4th January, 2018. Most eye banks were found in Maharashtra (166), followed by Karnataka (39) and Madhya Pradesh (36).<br /> <br /> <strong>Achievement of health-related SDGs targets</strong><br /> <br /> • On most targets pertaining to health-related Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), India lags behind the target. For example, although the target for coverage of essential health services is 100 percent (indicator no. 3.8.1), in our country only 57 percent of the population is covered by such services. Similarly, although the target for Maternal Mortality Ratio (per 1,00,000 live births) is 70 by 2030 (indicator no. 3.1.1), MMRatio in India presently is 174.<br /> <br /> • The target for Under-five mortality rate (per 1000 live births) is 25 by 2030 (indicator no. 3.2.1). However, U5MR in the country is 47.7.<br /> <br /> • In case of many SDG-related indicators such as Suicide mortality rate (per 100,000 population) (indicator no. 3.4.2) or say Adolescent birth rate (per 1000 women aged 15-19 years) (indicator no. 3.7.2), the SDG target is yet to be determined.<br /> <br /> • For many SDG-related indicators such as Hepatitis B incidence (indicator no. 3.3.4) or say Proportion of the population with access to affordable medicines and vaccines on a sustainable basis (indicator no. 3.b.1), the data for India is either not provided or remain unavailable.<br /> <br /> <strong>Table: Current Status of Health-related Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Target - Indian Scenario</strong><br /> <br /> <img alt="SDGs" src="tinymce/uploaded/SDGs_1.jpg" style="height:242px; width:334px" /><br /> <br /> <em><strong>Source:</strong> Monitoring Health in the Sustainable Development Goals: 2017, World Health Organization, Regional Office for South East Asia, as quoted in the National Health Profile 2018, please <a href="https://bit.ly/2MmfuuK">click here</a> to access, page no. 288<br /> <br /> Report of the Inter-Agency and Expert Group on Sustainable Development Goal Indicators (E/CN.3/2016/2/Rev.1), please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Final%20list%20of%20SDG%20indicators.pdf">click here</a> to access </em><br /> <br /> <br /> </p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">While state-level trends for some important health indicators have been available in India, a comprehensive assessment of the diseases causing the most premature deaths and disability in each state, the risk factors responsible for this burden, and their time trends have not been available in a single standardised framework. The India State-level Disease Burden Initiative was launched in October 2015 to address this crucial knowledge gap with support from the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare of the Government of India. This is a collaborative effort between the Indian Council of Medical Research, Public Health Foundation of India, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, and experts and stakeholders from about 100 institutions across India. The work of this Initiative is overseen by an Advisory Board consisting of eminent policymakers and involves extensive engagement of 14 domain expert groups with the estimation process. Based on intense work over two years, this report describes the distribution and trends of diseases and risk factors for every state of India from 1990 to 2016.<br /> <br /> The estimates were produced as part of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. The analytical methods of this study have been standardised over two decades of scientific work, which has been reported in over 16,000 peer-reviewed publications, making it the most widely used approach globally for disease burden estimation. These methods enable standardised comparisons of health loss caused by different diseases and risk factors, between geographic units, sexes, and age groups, and over time in a unified framework. The key metric used for this comparison is disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), which is the sum of the number of years of life lost due to premature death and a weighted measure of the years lived with disability due to a disease or injury. The use of DALYs to track disease burden is recommended by India’s National Health Policy of 2017.<br /> <br /> It is to be noted that attributable burden is the share of the burden of a disease that can be estimated to occur due to exposure to a particular risk factor.<br /> <br /> According to the report entitled [inside]India: Health of the Nation’s States - The India State-Level Disease Burden Initiative, Disease Burden Trends in the States of India 1990 to 2016 (released in October, 2017) [/inside], prepared by Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), Public Health Foundation of India (PHFI), Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) and Ministry of Health & Family Welfare (MoHFW), please <a href="https://im4change.org/docs/11592India_Health_of.pdf">click here</a> to access:<br /> <br /> <em>Health status improving, but major inequalities between states</em><br /> <br /> • Life expectancy at birth improved in India from 59.7 years in 1990 to 70.3 years in 2016 for females, and from 58.3 years to 66.9 years for males. There were, however, continuing inequalities between states, with a range of 66.8 years in Uttar Pradesh to 78.7 years in Kerala for females, and from 63.6 years in Assam to 73.8 years in Kerala for males in 2016.<br /> <br /> • The per person disease burden measured as DALYs rate dropped by 36 percent from 1990 to 2016 in India, after adjusting for the changes in the population age structure during this period. But there was an almost two-fold difference in this disease burden rate between the states in 2016, with Assam, Uttar Pradesh, and Chhattisgarh having the highest rates, and Kerala and Goa the lowest rates.<br /> <br /> • While the disease burden rate in India has improved since 1990, it was 72 percent higher per person than in Sri Lanka or China in 2016.<br /> <br /> • The under-5 mortality rate has reduced substantially from 1990 in all states, but there was a four-fold difference in this rate between the highest in Assam and Uttar Pradesh as compared with the lowest in Kerala in 2016, highlighting the vast health inequalities between the states.<br /> <br /> <em>Large differences between states in the changing disease profile</em><br /> <br /> • Of the total disease burden in India measured as DALYs, 61 percent was due to communicable, maternal, neonatal, and nutritional diseases (termed infectious and associated diseases in this summary for simplicity) in 1990, which dropped to 33 percent in 2016.<br /> <br /> • There was a corresponding increase in the contribution of non-communicable diseases from 30 percent of the total disease burden in 1990 to 55 percent in 2016, and of injuries from 9 percent to 12 percent.<br /> <br /> • Infectious and associated diseases made up the majority of disease burden in most of the states in 1990, but this was less than half in all states in 2016. However, the year when infectious and associated diseases transitioned to less than half of the total disease burden ranged from 1986 to 2010 for the various state groups in different stages of this transition.<br /> <br /> • The wide variations between the states in this epidemiological transition are reflected in the range of the contribution of major disease groups to the total disease burden in 2016: 48 percent to 75 percent for non-communicable diseases, 14 percent to 43 percent for infectious and associated diseases, and 9 percent to 14 percent for injuries. Kerala, Goa, and Tamil Nadu have the largest dominance of non-communicable diseases and injuries over infectious and associated diseases, whereas this dominance is present but relatively the lowest in Bihar, Jharkhand, Uttar Pradesh, and Rajasthan.<br /> <br /> • It is to be noted that epidemiological transition level (ETL) is based on the ratio of the number of DALYs in a population due to communicable, maternal, neonatal, and nutritional diseases to the number of DALYs due to non-communicable diseases and injuries together. A decreasing ratio indicates advancing epidemiological transition with an increasing relative burden from non-communicable diseases as compared with communicable, maternal, neonatal, and nutritional diseases.<br /> <br /> • The major EAG states of Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh both have a relatively lower level of development indicators and are at a similar less advanced epidemiological transition stage. However, Uttar Pradesh had 50 percent higher disease burden per person from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 54 percent higher burden from tuberculosis, and 30 percent higher burden from diarrhoeal diseases, whereas Madhya Pradesh had 76% higher disease burden per person from stroke. The cardiovascular risks were generally higher in Madhya Pradesh, and the unsafe water and sanitation risk was relatively higher in Uttar Pradesh.<br /> <br /> • The two North-East India states of Manipur and Tripura are both at a lower-middle stage of epidemiological transition but have quite different disease burden rates from specific leading diseases. Tripura had 49% higher per person burden from ischaemic heart disease, 52 percent higher from stroke, 64 percent higher from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 159 percent higher from iron-deficiency anaemia, 59 percent higher from lower respiratory infections, and 56 percent higher from neonatal disorders. Manipur, on the other hand, had 88 percent higher per person burden from tuberculosis and 38 percent higher from road injuries. Regarding the level of risks, child and maternal malnutrition, air pollution, and several of the cardiovascular risks were higher in Tripura.<br /> <br /> • The two adjoining north Indian states of Himachal Pradesh and Punjab both have a relatively higher level of development indicators and are at a similar more advanced epidemiological transition stage. However, there were striking differences between them in the level of burden from specific leading diseases. Punjab had 157 percent higher per person burden from diabetes, 134 percent higher burden from ischaemic heart disease, 49 percent higher burden from stroke, and 56 percent higher burden from road injuries. On the other hand, Himachal Pradesh had 63 percent higher per person burden from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Consistent with these findings, Punjab had substantially higher levels of cardiovascular risks than Himachal Pradesh.<br /> <br /> <em>Rising burden of non-communicable diseases in all states</em><br /> <br /> • The contribution of most of the major non-communicable disease groups to the total disease burden has increased all over India since 1990, including cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, chronic respiratory diseases, mental health and neurological disorders, cancers, musculoskeletal disorders, and chronic kidney disease.<br /> <br /> • Among the leading non-communicable diseases, the largest disease burden or DALY rate increase from 1990 to 2016 was observed for diabetes, at 80 percent, and ischaemic heart disease, at 34 percent. In 2016, three of the five leading individual causes of disease burden in India were non-communicable, with ischaemic heart disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as the top two causes and stroke as the fifth leading cause.<br /> <br /> • The range of disease burden or DALY rate among the states in 2016 was 9 fold for ischaemic heart disease, 4 fold for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and 6 fold for stroke, and 4 fold for diabetes across India. While ischaemic heart disease and diabetes generally had higher DALY rates in states that are at a more advanced epidemiological transition stage toward non-communicable diseases, the DALY rates of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were generally higher in the EAG states that are at a relatively less advanced epidemiological transition stage.<br /> <br /> • The DALY rates of stroke varied across the states without any consistent pattern in relation to the stage of epidemiological transition. This variety of trends of the different major non-communicable diseases indicates that policy and health system interventions to tackle their increasing burden have to be informed by the specific trends in each state.<br /> <br /> <em>Infectious and associated diseases reducing, but still high in many states</em><br /> <br /> • The burden of most infectious and associated diseases reduced in India from 1990 to 2016, but five of the ten individual leading causes of disease burden in India in 2016 still belonged to this group: diarrhoeal diseases, lower respiratory infections, iron-deficiency anaemia, preterm birth complications, and tuberculosis.<br /> <br /> • The burden caused by these conditions generally continues to be much higher in the Empowered Action Group (EAG) and North-East state groups than in the other states, but there were notable variations between the states within these groups as well.<br /> <br /> • One should noted that the Empowered Action Group (EAG) states is a group of eight states that receive special development effort attention from the Government of India, namely, Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Odisha, Rajasthan, Uttarakhand, and Uttar Pradesh.<br /> <br /> • For India as whole, the disease burden or DALY rate for diarrhoeal diseases, iron-deficiency anaemia, and tuberculosis was 2.5 to 3.5 times higher than the average globally for other geographies at a similar level of development, indicating that this burden can be brought down substantially.<br /> <br /> <em>Increasing but variable burden of injuries among states</em><br /> <br /> • The contribution of injuries to the total disease burden has increased in most states since 1990. The highest proportion of disease burden due to injuries is in young adults. Road injuries and self-harm, which includes suicides and non-fatal outcomes of self-harm, are the leading contributors to the injury burden in India.<br /> <br /> • The range of disease burden or DALY rate varied 3 fold for road injuries and 6 fold for self-harm among the states of India in 2016.<br /> <br /> • The burden due to road injuries was much higher in males than in females. The DALY rate for self-harm for India as a whole was 1.8 times higher than the average globally for other geographies at a similar level of development in 2016.<br /> <br /> <em>Rising risks for cardiovascular diseases and diabetes</em><br /> <br /> • Of the total disease burden in India in 1990, a tenth was caused by a group of risks including unhealthy diet, high blood pressure, high blood sugar, high cholesterol, and overweight, which mainly contribute to ischaemic heart disease, stroke, and diabetes. The contribution of this group of risks increased massively to a quarter of the total disease burden in India in 2016.<br /> <br /> • The combination of these risks was highest in Punjab, Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Andhra Pradesh, and Maharashtra in 2016, but importantly, the contribution of these risks has increased in every state of the country since 1990.<br /> <br /> • The other significant contributor to cardiovascular diseases and diabetes, as well as to cancers and some other diseases, is tobacco use, which was responsible for 6% of the total disease burden in India in 2016. All of these risks are generally higher in males than in females.<br /> <br /> <em>Unacceptably high risk of child and maternal malnutrition</em><br /> <br /> • While the disease burden due to child and maternal malnutrition has dropped in India substantially since 1990, this is still the single largest risk factor, responsible for 15% of the total disease burden in India in 2016. This burden is highest in the major EAG states and Assam, and is higher in females than in males.<br /> <br /> • Child and maternal malnutrition contributes to disease burden mainly through increasing the risk of neonatal disorders, nutritional deficiencies, diarrhoeal diseases, lower respiratory infections, and other common infections.<br /> <br /> • As a stark contrast, the disease burden due to child and maternal malnutrition in India was 12 times higher per person than in China in 2016. Kerala had the lowest burden due to this risk among the Indian states, but even this was 2.7 times higher per person than in China.<br /> <br /> <em>Unsafe water and sanitation improving, but not enough yet</em><br /> <br /> • Unsafe water and sanitation was the second leading risk responsible for disease burden in India in 1990, but dropped to the seventh leading risk in 2016, contributing 5 percent of the total disease burden, mainly through diarrhoeal diseases and other infections.<br /> <br /> • Risk factors means potentially modifiable causes of disease and injury.<br /> <br /> • The burden due to this risk is also highest in several EAG states and Assam, and higher in females than in males. The improvement in exposure to this risk from 1990 to 2016 was least in the EAG states, indicating that higher focus is needed in these states for more rapid improvements.<br /> <br /> • The per person disease burden due to unsafe water and sanitation was 40 times higher in India than in China in 2016.<br /> <br /> <em>Household air pollution improving, outdoor air pollution worsening</em><br /> <br /> • The contribution of air pollution to disease burden remained high in India between 1990 and 2016, with levels of exposure among the highest in the world. It causes burden through a mix of non-communicable and infectious diseases, mainly cardiovascular diseases, chronic respiratory diseases, and lower respiratory infections.<br /> <br /> • The burden of household air pollution decreased during the period 1990-2016 due to decreasing use of solid fuels for cooking, and that of outdoor air pollution increased due to a variety of pollutants from power production, industry, vehicles, construction, and waste burning.<br /> <br /> • Household air pollution was responsible for 5 percent of the total disease burden in India in 2016, and outdoor air pollution for 6 percent. The burden due to household air pollution is highest in the EAG states, where its improvement since 1990 has also been the slowest. On the other hand, the burden due to outdoor air pollution is highest in a mix of northern states, including Haryana, Uttar Pradesh, Punjab, Rajasthan, Bihar, and West Bengal.<br /> </p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> The report entitled National Health Accounts: Estimates for India 2014-15 (released in October, 2017) provides healthcare expenditures in India based on National Health Accounts Guidelines for India, 2016 (with refinements where required) that adhere to System of Health Accounts 2011 (SHA 2011), a global standard framework for producing health accounts. The NHA estimates for India is a result of an institutionalised process wherein, the boundaries, data sources, classification codes and estimation methodology have all been standardised in consultation with national and international experts under the guidance of NHA Expert Group for India.<br /> <br /> The NHA provides key indicators to understand financing of health system in the country and allows for comparison with other countries. The National Health Policy 2017 sets out several goals related to healthcare financing and emphasizes the need to track expenditures on health through a robust system of National Health Accounts. The production of annual NHA estimates builds a database for tracking trends in allocations for health by union/state governments and estimate the burden of out-of-pocket payments.<br /> <br /> The key findings of the report entitled [inside]National Health Accounts: Estimates for India 2014-15 (released in October, 2017)[/inside], which has been prepared by the National Health Accounts Technical Secretariat, National Health Systems Resource Centre and Ministry of Health and Family Welfare are as follows (please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/National%20Health%20Accounts%20Estimates%20Report%202014-15.pdf" title="National Health Accounts Estimates for India 2014-15">click here</a> to access):<br /> <br /> • The Total Health Expenditure (THE) for India is estimated at Rs. 4,83,259 crores (3.89 percent of GDP and Rs. 3,826 per capita) for the year 2014-15. THE constitutes current and capital expenditures incurred by Government and Private Sources including External/Donor funds. Current Health Expenditure (CHE) is Rs. 4,51,286 crores (93.4 percent of THE) and capital expenditures is Rs. 31,973 crores (6.6 percent of THE).<br /> <br /> • The Government Health Expenditure (GHE) including capital expenditure is Rs. 1,39,949 crores (29 percent of THE, 1.13 percent GDP and Rs. 1,108 per capita) for the year 2014-15. This amounts to about 3.94 percent of General Government Expenditure in 2014-15. Of the GHE, Union Government share is 37 percent and State Government share is 63 percent. Union Government Expenditure on National Health Mission is Rs. 20,199 crores, Defence Medical Services Rs. 6,695 crores, Railway Health Services is Rs. 2,111 crores, Central Government Health Scheme (CGHS) is Rs. 2,300 crores and Ex Servicemen Contributory Health Scheme (ECHS) is Rs. 2,243 crores.<br /> <br /> • The Out-of-Pocket Expenditure (OOPE) on health by households is Rs. 3,02,425 crores (62.6 percent of THE, 2.4 percent of GDP, Rs. 2,394 per capita) for the year 2014-15. Private Health Insurance expenditure is Rs. 17,755 crores (3.7 percent of THE) for the year 2014-15.<br /> <br /> • Of the Current Health Expenditure, Union Government share is Rs. 37,221 crores (8.2 percent) and the State Government’s share Rs. 59,978 crores (13.3 percent). Local bodies’ share is Rs. 2,960 crores (0.7 percent), Households share (including insurance contributions) about Rs. 3,20,262 crores (71 percent, OOPE being 67 percent). Contribution by enterprises (including insurance contributions) is Rs. 20,069 crores (4.4 percent) and NGOs is Rs. 7,422 crores (1.6 percent). External/donor funding contributes to about Rs. 3,374 crores (0.7 percent).<br /> <br /> • The Current Health Expenditure attributed to Government Hospitals is Rs. 64,685 crores (14.3 percent) and Private Hospitals Rs. 1, 16,943 (25.9 percent). Expenditures incurred on other Government Providers (including PHC, Dispensaries and Family Planning Centres) is Rs. 27,782 crores (6.2 percent), Other Private Providers (incl. private clinics) is Rs. 23,795 crores (5.3 percent), Providers of Patient Transport and Emergency Rescue is Rs. 20,627 crores (4.6 percent), Medical and Diagnostic laboratories is Rs. 21,058 crores (4.7 percent), Pharmacies is Rs. 1,30,451 crores (28.9 percent), Other Retailers is Rs. 559 crores (0.1 percent), Providers of Preventive care is Rs. 23,817 crores (5.3 percent), and Other Providers is Rs. 9,985 crores (2.2 percent). About Rs. 11,584 crores (2.6 percent) is attributed to Providers of Health System Administration and Financing.<br /> <br /> • Current health expenditure attributed to Inpatient Curative Care is Rs. 1,58,334 crores (35.1 percent), Outpatient curative care is Rs. 73,059 crores (16.2 percent), Patient Transportation is Rs. 20,627 crores (4.6 percent), Laboratory and Imaging services is Rs. 21,058 crores (4.7 percent), Prescribed Medicines is Rs. 1,28,887 crores (28.6 percent), Over The Counter (OTC) Medicines is Rs. 1564 crores (0.3 percent), Therapeutic Appliances and Medical Goods is Rs. 559 crores (0.1 percent), Preventive Care is Rs. 30,420 crores (6.7 percent), and others is Rs. 5,194 crores (1.2 percent). About Rs. 11,584 crores (2.6 percent) is attributed to Governance and Health System Administration.<br /> <br /> • Total Pharmaceutical Expenditure is 37.9 percent of CHE (includes prescribed medicines, over the counter drugs and those provided during an inpatient, outpatient or any other event involving a contact with health care provider). The Expenditure on Traditional, Complementary and Alternative Medicine (TCAM) is 16 percent of CHE.<br /> <br /> • The Current Health Expenditure attributed to Primary Care is 45.1 percent, Secondary Care is 35.6 percent, Tertiary care is 15.6 percent and governance and supervision is 2.6 percent. When this is disaggregated; Government expenditure on Primary Care is 51.3 percent, Secondary Care is 21.9 percent and Tertiary Care is 14 percent. Private expenditure on Primary Care is 43.1 percent, Secondary Care is 39.9 percent and Tertiary Care is 16.1 percent.<br /> </p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page** </p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/National%20Health%20Policy%202017.pdf">click here</a> to access the [inside]National Health Policy 2017[/inside].</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> The National Health Profile provides the latest data on all major health sector-related indicators in a comprehensive manner. It gives information on 6 major sectors i.e. Demographic, Socio-economic, Health Status, Health Finance, Health Infrastructure and Human Resources. <br /> <br /> According to the [inside]National Health Profile 2015[/inside], produced by the Central Bureau of Health Intelligence, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, (please <a href="http://www.cbhidghs.nic.in/E-Book%20HTML-2015/index.html">click here</a> to access):<br /> <br /> <strong><em>Demographic indicators</em></strong><br /> <br /> • Infant Mortality Rate has declined considerably (40 per 1000 live births in 2013), however differentials of rural (44) and urban (27) are still high.<br /> <br /> • Maternal Mortality Ratio (per 1 lakh live births) is highest in Assam (300) and lowest in Kerala (61) in 2011-13.<br /> <br /> • The life expectancy at birth has increased from 49.7 years in 1970-75 to 66.1 years in 2006-10. During 2006-10, the life expectancy for females has been 67.7 years and males has been 64.6 years. <br /> <br /> • Among the states, sex ratio is least for Haryana (879) while among the UTs, Daman and Diu (618) lags behind. Kerala (1084) tops the list with maximum sex ratio.<br /> <br /> • The Total Fertility Rate (TFR) for the country has been 2.3 in 2013. In rural areas it has been 2.5, and in urban areas it has been 1.8.<br /> <br /> <strong><em>Socio-economic indicators</em></strong><br /> <br /> • Literacy rate stood at 73 percent in 2011. Literacy rate among females has been 64.6 percent and males has been 80.9 percent. Literacy rate in urban areas (84.1 percent) has been more as compared to the same in rural areas (67.8 percent). Literacy rate has been highest in Kerala (94 percent)<br /> <br /> • The percentage of population below the poverty line (as per Tendulkar methodology) has been 21.9 percent in 2011-12. The percentage of population below the poverty line in rural areas has been 25.7 percent and in urban areas has been 13.7 percent.<br /> <br /> • The per capita Net National Income at current prices increased almost 3 times from Rs. 24,143 in 2004-05 to Rs. 74,920 in 2013-14.<br /> <br /> • The per capita per day net availability of cereals has increased from 386.2 gm in 2001 to 468.9 gm in 2013. Similarly, the per capita per day net availability of pulses has increased from 30 gm in 2001 to 41.9 gm in 2013.<br /> <br /> • Slum population in India is projected to increase from 9.30 crore in 2011 to 10.47 crore in 2017.<br /> <br /> • Of the total 1.34 crore residences in slums, nearly 58.5 percent are in good condition, 37.4 percent are in livable condition and 4.1 percent are in dilapidated condition. <br /> <br /> <strong><em>Health status </em></strong><br /> <br /> • Based on available evidence, cardiovascular disease (24 percent), chronic respiratory disease (11 percent), cancer (6 percent) and diabetes (2 percent) are the leading cause of mortality in India.<br /> <br /> • The total number of dengue cases in India has grown from 28,292 in 2010 to 40,425 in 2014. The total number of dengue related deaths stood at 131 in 2014.<br /> <br /> • The total number of Japanese Encephalitis cases in India has grown from 555 in 2010 to 1,652 in 2014. The total number of Japanese Encephalitis related deaths stood at 292 in 2014.<br /> <br /> • The total number of malaria cases in India has grown from nearly 16 lakh in 2010 to 10.71 lakh in 2014. The total number of malaria related deaths stood at 535 in 2014.<br /> <br /> • The total number of Chikungunya fever cases in India has reduced from 48,176 in 2010 to 15,445 in 2014. <br /> <br /> • Nearly 47 percent of deliveries in India during 2012-13 were institutional whereas 52.3 percent deliveries took place at home. <br /> <br /> • Nearly 40.5 percent of children under 3 years of age were breastfed within an hour of birth in 2012-13. <br /> <br /> • At the national level, nearly 54 percent of children aged 12-23 months received full vaccination during 2012-13.<br /> <br /> • The incidence of infanticide was 82 and foeticide was 210 in 2012.<br /> <br /> <strong><em>Health finance</em></strong><br /> <br /> • Per capita public expenditure on health in nominal terms has gone up from Rs. 621 in 2009-10 to Rs. 1280 in 2014-15.<br /> <br /> • Public expenditure on health as a percentage of GDP has gone up from 1.12 percent in 2009-10 to 1.26 percent in 2014-15.<br /> <br /> • The Centre-state share in total public expenditure on health has changed from 36:64 in 2009-10 to 30:70 in 2014-15.<br /> <br /> • Out-of-pocket (OOP) medical expenditure incurred during 2011-12 has been Rs. 146 per capita per month for urban India and Rs. 95 for rural India.<br /> <br /> • Over 60 percent of total OOP health expenditure is on medicines, both in rural and urban India in 2011-12.<br /> <br /> • As a share of total consumption expenditure, OOP expenditure on health has been 6.7 percent in rural India and 5.5 percent in urban India in 2011-12.<br /> <br /> • Per capita OOP expenditure as well as the share of OOP in total consumption expenditure was positively correlated with consumption expenditure fractiles; higher fractiles had higher levels of both per capita OOP and share of OOP in consumption expenditure in 2011-12.<br /> <br /> • Among all the states, Kerala had the highest per capita OOP medical expenditure as well as its share in total consumption expenditure in 2011-12.<br /> <br /> • Around 22 crore individuals were covered under any health insurance in 2013-14. This means 18 percent of the population has been covered under any health insurance.<br /> <br /> <strong><em>Human resources in health sector</em></strong><br /> <br /> • The total number of doctors possessing recognized medical qualification (under the IMC Act), registered with state medical councils or Medical Council of India, stood at 15,976 in 2014.<br /> <br /> • The total number of dental surgeons registered with the Central/ State Dental Councils of India stood at 1.54 lakhs in 2014, which was 21,720 in 1994.<br /> <br /> • The total number of Government allopathic doctors stood at 1.06 lakhs and the total number of Government dental surgeons stood at 5,614.<br /> <br /> • As on 31 December, 2014, the total number of Auxiliary Nurse Midwives (ANMs) stood at 7.86 lakh, whereas Registered Nurses & Registered Midwives (RN & RM) stood at 17.8 lakhs and Lady Health Visitors (LHV) stood at 55,914.<br /> <br /> • As on 27 June, 2014, the total number of pharmacists stood at 6.64 lakh.<br /> <br /> <strong><em>Health infrastructure</em></strong><br /> <br /> • The total number of licensed blood banks in India as on February 2015 is 2760.<br /> <br /> • There are 20,306 hospitals having 6.76 lakh beds in India. There are 16,816 hospitals in rural areas having 1.84 lakh beds and 3,490 hospitals in urban areas having 4.92 lakh beds.<br /> <br /> • The number of medical colleges in India has more than doubled from 146 in 1991-92 to 398 in 2014-15.<br /> </p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> The 71st round National Sample Survey on “Social Consumption: Health” was conducted during January to June 2014. The information in the survey was collected from 36,480 households in rural areas and 29,452 households in urban areas during the 71st round.<br /> <br /> The key findings of the [inside]71st round NSS report: Key Indicators of Social Consumption in India Health (published in June 2015)[/inside] are as follows (please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/nss_71st_ki_health_30june15.pdf" title="NSS 71st Round Health">click here</a> to access the full report; please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/NSS%20Press%20Release%20Health.pdf" title="NSS Press Note Health">click here</a> to read the summary of findings):<br /> <br /> <em>A. Non-hospitalized treatment</em><br /> <br /> • The Proportion (per 1000) of Ailing Persons (PAP), measured as the number of living persons reporting ailments (per 1000 persons), was 89 persons in rural India and 118 persons in urban India.<br /> <br /> • Inclination towards allopathy treatment was prevalent (around 90% in both the sectors). Only 5 to 7 percent usage of ‘other’ including AYUSH (Ayurveda, Yoga or Naturopathy Unani, Siddha and homoeopathy) was reported both in rural and urban area. Moreover, un-treated spell was higher in rural (both for male and female) than urban areas.<br /> <br /> • Private doctors were the most important single source of treatment in both the sectors (Rural & Urban). More than 70 percent (72 per cent in the rural areas and 79 per cent in the urban areas) spells of ailment were treated in the private sector (consisting of private doctors, nursing homes, private hospitals, charitable institutions, etc.).<br /> <br /> <em>B. Hospitalized treatment</em><br /> <br /> • Medical treatment of an ailing person as an in-patient in any medical institution having provision for treating the sick as in-patients, was considered as hospitalised treatment. In the urban population, 4.4 percent persons were hospitalised at some time during a reference period of 365 days. The proportion of persons hospitalised in the rural areas was lower (3.5 percent).<br /> <br /> • It is observed that in rural India, 42 percent hospitalised treatment was carried out in public hospital and rest 58 percent in private hospital. For the urban India, the corresponding figures were 32 percent and 68 percent. It may be noted in this context that households (or persons within households) were segregated in sector (rural/urban) by their place of domicile, and not by the place of treatment.<br /> <br /> • Preference towards allopathy treatment was observed in cases of hospitalised treatment as well.<br /> <br /> <em>C. Cost of treatment - as in-patient and other</em><br /> <br /> • Average medical expenditure per hospitalisation case: Higher amount was spent for treatment per hospitalised case by people in the private hospitals (Rs. 25850) than in the public hospitals (Rs. 6120). The highest expenditure was recorded for treatment of Cancer (Rs. 56712) followed by that for Cardio-vascular diseases (Rs. 31647).<br /> <br /> • Average medical expenditure per non-hospitalisation case was Rs. 509 in rural India and Rs. 639 in urban India.<br /> <br /> • As much as 86 percent of rural population and 82 percent of urban population were still not covered under any scheme of health expenditure support. Government, however, was able to bring about 12 percent urban and 13 percent rural population under health protection coverage through Rastriya Swasthya Bima Yojana (RSBY) or similar plan. Only 12 percent households of the 5th quintile class (Usual Monthly Per Capita Consumer Expenditure) of urban area had some arrangement of medical insurance from private provider.<br /> <br /> <em>D. Incidence of childbirth, Expenditure on institutional childbirth</em><br /> <br /> • In rural area 9.6% women (age 15-49) were pregnant at any time during the reference period of 365 days; for urban this proportion was 6.8%. Evidence of interrelation of place of childbirth with level of living is noted both in rural and urban areas. In the rural areas, about 20% of the childbirths were at home or any other place other than the hospitals. The same for urban areas was 10.5%. Among the institutional childbirth, 55.5% took place in public hospital and 24% in private hospital in rural area. In urban area, however, the corresponding figures were 42% and 47.5% respectively.<br /> <br /> • An average of Rs. 5544 was spent per childbirth (as inpatient) in rural area and Rs. 11685 in urban area. The rural population spent, on an average, Rs. 1587 for the same in a public sector hospital and Rs. 14778 for one in a private sector hospital. The corresponding figures for urban India were Rs. 2117 and Rs. 20328.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> The key findings of the [inside]Draft National Health Policy 2015 (published in December 2014)[/inside], prepared by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare are as follows (Please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Draft%20National%20Health%20Policy%202015.pdf" title="Draft NHP 2015">click here</a> to download):<br /> <br /> • The draft National Health Policy accepts and endorses the understanding that a full achievement of the goals and principles as defined would require an increased public health expenditure to 4% to 5% of the GDP. However, given that the NHP, 2002 target of 2% was not met, and taking into account the financial capacity of the country to provide this amount and the institutional capacity to utilize the increased funding in an effective manner, the present draft health policy proposes a potentially achievable target of raising public health expenditure to 2.5% of the GDP. It also notes that 40% of this would need to come from Central expenditures. At current prices, a target of 2.5% of GDP translates to Rs. 3800 per capita, representing an almost four fold increase in five years.<br /> <br /> • The private sector today provides nearly 80% of outpatient care and about 60% of inpatient care. (The out-patient estimate would be significantly lower if we included only qualified providers. By NSSO estimates as much as 40% of the private care is likely to be by informal unqualified providers). 72% of all private health care enterprises are own-account-enterprises (OAEs), which are household run businesses providing health services without hiring a worker on a fairly regular basis.<br /> <br /> • In terms of comparative efficiency, public sector is value for money as it accounts (based on the NSSO 60th round) for less than 30% of total expenditure, but provides for about 20% of outpatient care and 40% of in-patient care. This same expenditure also pays for 60% of end-of-life care (RGI estimates on hospital mortality), and almost 100% of preventive and promotive care and a substantial part of medical and nursing education as well.<br /> <br /> • Thailand has almost the same total health expenditure as India but its proportion of public health expenditure is 77.7% of total health expenditures (which is 3.2% of the GDP) and this is spent through a form of strategic purchasing in which about 95% is purchased from public health care facilities- which is what gives it such a high efficiency. Brazil spends 9% of its GDP on health but of this public health expenditure constitutes 4.1% of the GDP (which is 45.7% of total health expenditure). This public health expenditure accounts for almost 75% of all health care provision. It would be ambitious if India could aspire to a public health expenditure of 4% of the GDP, but most expert groups have estimated 2.5% as being more realistic.<br /> <br /> • As costs of care rise, affordability, as distinct from equity, requires emphasis. Health care costs of a household exceeding 10% of its total monthly consumption expenditures or 40% of its non-food consumption expenditure- is designated catastrophic health expenditures- and is declared as an unacceptable level of health care costs.<br /> <br /> • Almost all hospitalization even in public hospitals leads to catastrophic health expenditures, and over 63 million persons are faced with poverty every year due to health care costs alone. It is because there is no financial protection for the vast majority of health care needs. In 2011-12, the share of out-of-pocket expenditure on health care as a proportion of total household monthly per capita expenditure was 6.9% in rural areas and 5.5% in urban areas. This led to an increasing number of households facing catastrophic expenditures due to health costs (18% of all households in 2011-12 as compared to 15% in 2004-05). Under NRHM, free care in public hospitals was extended to a select set of conditions – for maternity, newborn and infant care as part of the Janani Suraksha Yojana and, the Janani Shishu Suraksha Karyakram, and for disease control programmes. For all other services, user fees especially for diagnostics and “outside prescriptions” for drugs continued. Also, due to the selective approach, several essential services especially for chronic illness was not obtainable or at best only available at overcrowded district and medical college hospitals resulting in physical and financial hardship and poor quality of care.<br /> <br /> • The Central Government under the Ministry of Labour & Employment, launched the Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana (RSBY) in 2008. The population coverage under these various schemes increased from almost 55 million people in 2003-04 to about 370 million in 2014 (almost one-fourth of the population). Nearly two thirds (180 million) of this population are those in the Below Poverty Line (BPL) category. Evaluations show that schemes such as the RSBY, have improved utilization of hospital services, especially in private sector and among the poorest 20% of households and SC/ST households. However there are other problems. One problem is low awareness among the beneficiaries about the entitlement and how and when to use the RSBY card. Another is related to denial of services by private hospitals for many categories of illnesses, and over supply of some services.<br /> <br /> • The private health care industry is valued at $40 billion and is projected to grow to $ 280 billion by 2020 as per market sources. The current growth rate of this perennially and most rapidly growing area of the economy, the healthcare industry, at 14% is projected to be 21% in the next decade. Even during the global recession of 2008, this sector remained relatively recession-proof. The private health care industry is complex and differentiated. It includes insurance and equipment, which accounts for about 15%, pharmaceuticals which accounts for over 25%, about 10% on diagnostics and about 50% is hospitals and clinical care. The private sector growth cannot be seen merely as a consequence of limited public sector investment. The Government has had an active policy in the last 25 years of building a positive economic climate for the health care industry. Amongst these measures are lower direct taxes; higher depreciation in medical equipment; Income Tax exemptions for 5 years for rural hospitals; custom duty exemptions for imported equipment that are lifesaving; Income Tax exemption for Health Insurance; and active engagement through publicly financed health insurance which now covers almost 27% of the population.<br /> <br /> • Maternal mortality now accounts for 0.55% of all deaths and 4% of all female deaths in the 15 to 49 year age group.<br /> <br /> • India is set to reach the Millennium Development Goals (MDG) with respect to maternal and child survival. The MDG target for Maternal Mortality Ratio (MMR) is 140 per 100,000 live births. From a baseline of 560 in 1990, the nation had achieved 178 by 2010-12, and at this rate of decline is estimated to reach an MMR of 141 by 2015.<br /> <br /> • In the case of under-5 mortality rate (U5MR), the MDG target is 42. From a baseline of 126 in 1990, in 2012 the nation has an U5MR of 52 and an extrapolation of this rate would bring it to 42 by 2015. This is particularly creditable on a global scale where in 1990 India's MMR and U5MR were 47% and 40% above the international average respectively.<br /> <br /> • Although over 90% of pregnant women receive one antenatal check up and 87% received full TT immunization, only about 68.7% of women have received the mandatory three antenatal check-ups. Again whereas most women had received iron and folic acid tablets, only 31% of pregnant women had consumed more than 100 IFA tablets. For institutional delivery, standard protocols are often not followed during labour and the postpartum period. Sterilization related deaths a preventable tragedy, are often a direct consequence of poor quality of care. Only 61% of children (12-23 months) have been fully immunized.<br /> <br /> • In AIDS control, progress has been good with a decline from a 0.41% prevalence rate in 2001 to 0.27% in 2011 but this still leaves about 21 lakh persons living with HIV, with about 1.16 lakh new cases and 1.48 deaths in 2011. In tuberculosis the challenge is a prevalence of close to 211 cases and 19 deaths per 100,000 population and rising problems of multi-drug resistant tuberculosis. Though these are significant declines from the MDG baseline, India still contributes to 24% of all global new case detection.<br /> <br /> • Over 75% of communicable diseases are not part of existing national programmes. Overall, communicable diseases contribute to 24.4% of the entire disease burden while maternal and neonatal ailments contribute to 13.8%. Non-communicable diseases (39.1%) and injuries (11.8%) now constitute the bulk of the country's disease burden. National Health Programmes for non-communicable diseases are very limited in coverage and scope, except perhaps in the case of the Blindness control programme.<br /> <br /> • The gap between service availability and needs is widest in the case of mental illness- 43 facilities in the nation with a 0.47 psychologists per million people.<br /> <br /> • The elderly i.e. the population above 60 years comprise 8.6% of the population (103.8 million) and they are also a vulnerable section. Those above 75 years (20.52 million) are most vulnerable and almost 8% of the elderly population is bed ridden or homebound (NSSO).<br /> <br /> **page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The report entitled [inside]Economic Burden of Tobacco Related Diseases in India[/inside] (please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/economic_burden_of_tobacco_related_diseases_in_india_executive_summary.pdf" title="Economic Burden of tobacco related diseases">click here</a> to download the Executive Summary), supported by the Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India and the WHO Country Office for India, was developed by the Public Health Foundation of India (PHFI).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The report estimates direct and indirect costs from all diseases caused due to tobacco use and four specific diseases namely, respiratory diseases, tuberculosis, cardiovascular diseases and cancers. The report also highlights that tobacco use and the associated costs are creating an enormous burden for the nation.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">The total economic costs attributable to tobacco use from all diseases in India in the year 2011 for persons aged 35-69 amounted to Rs. 104500 crores of which 16 percent was direct cost and 84 percent was indirect cost. </p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to the report, massive direct medical costs of tobacco attributable diseases amount to Rs.16,800 crore and associated indirect morbidity cost of Rs. 14,700 crore. The cost from premature mortality is Rs. 73,000 crores, indicating a substantial productive loss to the nation, the report states. </p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to the United Nations' report (released in May, 2014) entitled [inside]Trends in maternal mortality estimates 1990 to 2013[/inside], (please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Trends%20in%20Maternal%20Mortality%201990%20to%202013.pdf" title="Trends in Maternal Mortality 1990 to 2013">click here</a> to download): </p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em><strong>Indian scenario</strong></em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Maternal mortality ratio (MMR)* in India stood at 560 maternal deaths (per 100000 live births) during 1990, 460 during 1995, 370 during 2000, 280 during 2005 and 190 during 2013.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• As compared to India (MMR: 190 per 100000 live births), Brazil (MMR: 69) and China (MMR: 32) performed better in reducing maternal deaths.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• An Indian woman’s lifetime risk of maternal death** – the probability that a 15 year old woman will eventually die from a maternal cause – is 1 in 190, whereas for a Chinese woman it is 1 in 1800 and for a Brazilian woman it is 1 in 780. </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• At the country level, the two countries that accounted for one third of all global maternal deaths are India at 17 percent (50000) and Nigeria at 14 percent (40000). </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The proportion of deaths among women of reproductive age that are due to maternal causes (PM)*** in India is 6.7 percent whereas for China it is 1.6 percent and for Brazil it is 2.8 percent.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The ten countries that comprised 58 percent of the global maternal deaths reported in 2013 are: India (50000, 17%); Nigeria (40000, 14%); Democratic Republic of the Congo (21000, 7%); Ethiopia (13000, 4%); Indonesia (8800, 3%); Pakistan (7900, 3%); United Republic of Tanzania (7900, 3%); Kenya (6300, 2%); China (5900, 2%); Uganda (5900, 2%). </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• India could reduce MMR by 65 percent between 1990 and 2013.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The present report has classified India among 96 countries with incomplete civil registration and/or other types of maternal mortality data.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em><strong>Global scenario</strong></em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Every day, approximately 800 women die from preventable causes related to pregnancy and childbirth.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Under MDG5, countries committed to reducing maternal mortality by three quarters between 1990 and 2015. Since 1990, maternal deaths worldwide have dropped by 45%. However, between 1990 and 2013, the global maternal mortality ratio (i.e. the number of maternal deaths per 100 000 live births) declined by only 2.6% per year. This is far from the annual decline of 5.5% required to achieve MDG5.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• 99 percent of all maternal deaths occur in developing countries. More than half of these deaths occur in sub-Saharan Africa and almost one third occur in South Asia.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The maternal mortality ratio in developing countries in 2013 is 230 per 100 000 live births versus 16 per 100 000 live births in developed countries. </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• A woman’s lifetime risk of maternal death – the probability that a 15 year old woman will eventually die from a maternal cause – is 1 in 3700 in developed countries, versus 1 in 160 in developing countries.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Maternal mortality is higher in women living in rural areas and among poorer communities.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Young adolescents face a higher risk of complications and death as a result of pregnancy than older women.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The major complications that account for 80% of all maternal deaths are: a. severe bleeding (mostly bleeding after childbirth); b. infections (usually after childbirth); c. high blood pressure during pregnancy (pre-eclampsia and eclampsia); and d. unsafe abortion. The remainder are caused by or associated with diseases such as malaria, and AIDS during pregnancy. Skilled care before, during and after childbirth can save the lives of women and newborn babies.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• While levels of antenatal care have increased in many parts of the world during the past decade, only 46 percent of women in low-income countries benefit from skilled care during childbirth.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Other factors that prevent women from receiving or seeking care during pregnancy and childbirth are: poverty, distance, lack of information, inadequate services and cultural practices. </p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Note: </strong></p> <p style="text-align:justify">* Maternal mortality ratio (MMR) is the number of maternal deaths during a given time period per 100000 live births during the same time period.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">** Adult lifetime risk of maternal death is the probability that a 15-year-old women will die eventually from a maternal cause.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">*** Proportion of deaths among women of reproductive age that are due to maternal causes (PM) is the number of maternal deaths in a given time period divided by the total deaths among women aged 15–49 years.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify">Please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Rural%20Health%20Statistics%20of%20India%202012.pdf" title="Rural Health Statistics of India 2012">click here</a> to access the latest edition of [inside]Rural Health Statistics in India 2012[/inside] that was released by the Union health ministry. The report provides detailed statistics on rural health infrastructure on the basis of information available up to March, 2012 and data provided by the States and Union Territories.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> According to the UNICEF report titled [inside]Committing to Child Survival: A Promise Renewed Progress Report 2013[/inside] (please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/APR_Progress_Report_2013_9_Sept_2013_1.pdf" title="UNICEF child mortality report">click here</a> to download):<br /> <br /> <strong><em>Indian scenario</em></strong><br /> <br /> • Under Five Mortality Rate (Probability of dying between birth and exactly 5 years of age, expressed per 1,000 live births) in India for the year 2012, stands at 56 and India's ranking in terms of U5MR is 49. In 2012, the neonatal mortality rate (Probability of dying in the first month of life, expressed per 1,000 live births) at national level is at 31. The share of neonatal deaths in under-five deaths stood at 55 percent in 2012 as compared to 41 percent in 1990. <br /> <br /> • U5MR in India declined by 55 percent from 126 in 1990 to 56 in 2012. Infant Mortality Rate (Probability of dying between birth and exactly 1 year of age, expressed per 1,000 live births) declined from 88 in 1990 to 44 in 2012. Neonatal mortality rate declined from 51 in 1990 to 31 in 2012. <br /> <br /> • U5MR in India among boys declined from 121 in 1990 to 54 in 2012. U5MR in India among girls declined from 130 in 1990 to 59 in 2012.<br /> <br /> • In 2012, 21 percent deaths among Indian children under 5 years of age occurred due to pneumonia, 10 percent due to diarrhoea, 1 percent due to malaria, 3 percent due to measles and 43 percent due to neonatal causes.<br /> <br /> • Half of all under-five deaths occur in just five countries: India (22%), Nigeria (13%), Pakistan, the Democratic Republic of the Congo (each 6%) and China (4%).<br /> <br /> • Around two-thirds of neonatal deaths occur in just 10 countries, with India accounting for more than one-quarter and Nigeria for a tenth. More than 4 in 10 of all neonatal deaths worldwide occur in just three countries: India, Nigeria, and Pakistan.<br /> <br /> • More than half of the under-five deaths caused by pneumonia or diarrhoea occur in just four countries: India, Nigeria, Pakistan and the Democratic Republic of the Congo.<br /> <br /> • The Governments of Ethiopia, India and the United States, together with the UN agency, launched in 2012 ‘Committing to Child Survival: A Promise Renewed', a global effort to accelerate efforts to stop young children from dying from preventable causes. Some 176 governments have signed on, including those making some of the greatest strides in under-five mortality.<br /> <br /> • In February 2013, the Government of India, another cosponsor of the global Call to Action, convened a national forum of state policymakers, technical advisors, civil society organizations and private-sector partners to identify and commit to high-impact strategies that can accelerate the decline in preventable child deaths.<br /> <br /> <strong><em>Global scenario</em></strong><br /> <br /> • In 2012, around 6.6 million children died globally before their fifth birthday, at a rate of around 18,000 per day. Since 1990, 216 million children have died before their fifth birthday — more than the current total population of Brazil, the world’s fifth most populous country.<br /> <br /> • Of the 6.6 million under-five deaths globally in 2012, most were from preventable causes such as pneumonia, diarrhoea or malaria; around 44% of deaths in children under 5 occurred during the neonatal period. Pneumonia and diarrhoea remain leading causes of deaths among children under 5, killing almost 5,000 children under 5 every day. Malaria remains an important cause of child death, killing 1,200 children under 5 every day.<br /> <br /> • Global progress in reducing child deaths since 1990 has been very significant. The global rate of under-five mortality has roughly halved, from 90 deaths per 1,000 live births in 1990 to 48 per 1,000 in 2012. The estimated annual number of under-five deaths has fallen from 12.6 million to 6.6 million over the same period.<br /> <br /> • Put another way, 17,000 fewer children die each day in 2012 than did in 1990 — thanks to more effective and affordable treatments, innovative ways of delivering critical interventions to the poor and excluded, and sustained political commitment. These and other vital child survival interventions have helped to save an estimated 90 million lives in the past 22 years.<br /> <br /> • The global annual rate of reduction in under-five deaths has steadily accelerated since 1990-1995, when it stood at 1.2%, more than tripling to 3.9% in 2005-2012. Both sub-Saharan African regions—particularly Eastern and Southern Africa but also West and Central Africa—have seen a consistent acceleration in reducing under-five deaths, particularly since 2000.<br /> <br /> • At the current rate of reduction in under-five mortality, the world will only make MDG 4 by 2028 — 13 years after the deadline — and 35 million more children will die between 2015 and 2028 whose lives could be saved if we were able to make the goal on time in 2015 and continue that trend.<br /> <br /> • Accelerating progress in child survival urgently requires greater attention to ending preventable child deaths in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia, which together account for 4 out of 5 under-five deaths globally.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page** </p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to the [inside]Pneumonia Progress Report, 2012[/inside], released by IVAC and John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012.pdf" title="Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012">click here</a> to access:</p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The 2000-2010 decade brought a significant reduction in overall child mortality, from 9.6 to 7.6 million. Pneumonia continues to be the number one killer of children around the world-causing 18% of all child mortality, an estimated 1.3 million child deaths in 2011 alone.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Nearly 99 percent of all pneumonia deaths occur in developing countries, and three-quarters take place in just 15 countries. The majority of pneumonia cases are preventable or treatable.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Pneumonia is the leading cause of child mortality in India, responsible for the deaths of nearly 400,000 children under five in 2010.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Percentage of Indian children with suspected pneumonia receiving antibiotics stood at 13 percent in 2010.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Percentage of under-five Indian children with suspected pneumonia taken to appropriate health-care provider stood at 69 percent in 2010.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Percentage of children receiving exclusive breastfeeding in first 6 months of life is 46 percent (as per latest available data during 2006-2010).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Vaccine coverage in the case of DTP3 (third dose of diphtheria and tetanus toxoid and pertussis vaccine) is 72 percent and in the case of measles is 74 percent in 2011. </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• India and Nigeria, two large countries with the highest numbers of child deaths worldwide, remain low scorers with an average intervention coverage (interventions in terms of vaccination, breastfeeding, access to care and antibiotic treatment) rate of 55% and 40%, respectively.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• One notable area of progress in India is on coverage of two vaccines that can help prevent pneumonia, Hib vaccine and measles vaccine. While Hib vaccine uptake has been slow in India’s public sector, momentum is now shifting following efforts by the Ministry of Health & Family Welfare (MOHFW), states, health experts and advocates to prioritize implementation of the National Technical Advisory Group on Immunization’s (NTAGI) recommendation to add Hib to the Universal Immunization Programme (UIP). </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Two Indian states, Tamil Nadu and Kerala, introduced Hib vaccines (in the form of the pentavalent vaccine) in December 2011, and six more are slated to do so by the end of 2012. At a recent Hib Symposium in the state of Odisha, MOHFW officials stated that at least twice as many additional states have expressed interest in the vaccine.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• India has joined other WHO Member States in introducing a second dose of measles vaccine into the UIP to ensure its children are protected from the virus, which contributes to the burden of pneumonia. Measles was once one of the leading causes of death in children, but global measles deaths have declined dramatically because of widespread coverage with two doses of measles vaccine. India began a phased introduction of the second dose in 2010; by the end of the first year, the second dose of measles vaccine had been added to routine immunization in 21 states and catch-up campaigns were completed in 197 districts in 14 states.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to the report titled: [inside]Defeating malaria in Asia, the Pacific, Americas, Middle East and Europe, November, 2012[/inside], which has been produced by World Health Organization and PATH, <a href="http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Defeating%20malaria.pdf">http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Defeating%20malaria.pdf</a>: </p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The Indian Commission on Macroeconomics and Health notes that, in India, 13 household person-days per patient were lost per episode of malaria. Furthermore, the commission estimated that the overall monetary losses to families (income losses together with treatment expenses) could amount to between 200 and 400 Indian rupees (US$ 3.5 to 7).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• With an estimated 22.5 million malaria cases in India, this translates to an annual cost of US$ 79 to 157 million, or 0.01% of gross domestic product each year. </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• In states with the highest incidence rates, such as Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Meghalaya, Mizoram, and Orissa, the annual cost of illness represents more than 0.1% of a gross state income.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Tribal populations living in forests in Orissa, India, have incidence rates that are almost 10 times higher than in the plains.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Odisha is one of the most highly malaria-endemic states in India, accounting for 24% of reported cases in 2010 despite consisting of less of than 4% of the national population. Malaria is particularly common among tribal groups which represent 44% of the population of Orissa.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• A study in Sundargarh District of Odisha showed that forest areas had an annual incidence of 280 cases per 1000 population compared to 30 cases per 1000 on the plains. Approximately 84% of infections in forest areas were due to P. falciparum compared to 69% in plain areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Malaria’s main victims tend to be poorer populations living in rural communities, with limited or no access to long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• WHO estimates that 216 million cases of malaria occurred globally in 2010; 34 million (16%) of these occurred outside of Africa of which 18.1 million (53%) were due to P. falciparum. </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• WHO estimates that 655 000 deaths occurred globally, of which 46 000 (7%) occurred outside of Africa. WHO estimates that 2.5 billion people were at risk of malaria outside of Africa.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• There are 98 countries with ongoing transmission of malaria. Of these, 47 lie on the African continent, 21 are in the Americas, and 30 in Europe, Asia, and the Pacific. Of the 98 countries, 81 are in the control phase, 8 in the pre-elimination phase, and 9 in the elimination phase.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• While the disease burden has been declining in countries with fewer malaria cases and deaths, progress has been slower in countries where the bulk of the disease burden lies: India, Indonesia, Myanmar, Pakistan, and Papua New Guinea. These five high-burden countries account for 89% of all malaria cases in the region.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Malaria transmission occurs in 17 countries of Asia. Approximately 2 billion people in the region live at some risk of malaria, of which 525 million live at high risk (reported incidence more than 1 case per 1000 population per year).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Most reported cases of malaria in Asia are due to P. falciparum although the proportion varies considerably by country; it exceeds 80% in the Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Myanmar, Timor-Leste, and Viet Nam, while transmission is exclusively due to P. vivax in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea and the Republic of Korea.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Insecticide resistance has now been reported in 24 out of 51 countries with malaria transmission outside of Africa.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page** </p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to [inside]Children in India 2012-A Statistical Appraisal[/inside], Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, GoI, please <a href="https://im4change.org/docs/659Children_in_India_2012.pdf">click here</a> to access:</p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em><strong>Neonatal Mortality Rate</strong></em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">• In 2010, the neonatal mortality rate (Probability of dying in the first month of life, expressed per 1,000 live births) at national level is at 33 and ranges from 19 in urban areas to 36 in rural areas. Among bigger states, neo-natal mortality rate is highest in Madhya Pradesh (44) and lowest in Kerala (7).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The rural–urban gap in neo natal mortality rate was highest in Andhra Pradesh and Assam (23 points), followed by Rajasthan (22 points). The rural –urban gap in neo natal mortality rate lowest in Kerala (3 points), followed by Tamil Nadu (6 points).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Factors which affect fetal and neonatal deaths are primarily endogenous, while those which affect post neonatal deaths are primarily exogenous. The endogenous factors are related to the formation of the foetus in the womb and are therefore, mainly biological in nature. Among the biological factors affecting fetal and neonatal infant mortality rates the important ones are the age of the mother, birth order, period of spacing between births, prematurity, weight at birth, mothers health.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em><strong>Infant Mortality Rate </strong></em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Infant Mortality Rate (Probability of dying between birth and exactly 1 year of age, expressed per 1,000 live births) has declined for males from 78 in 1990 to 46 in 2010 and for females the decline was from 81 to 49 during this period.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Infant Mortality Rate for the country as a whole declined from 66 in 2001 to 47 in 2010. With the present improved trend due to sharp fall during 2008-09, the national level estimate of infant mortality rate is likely to be 44 against the MDG target of 27 in 2015.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Infant Mortality Rate has declined in urban areas from 50 in 1990 to 31 in 2010, whereas in rural areas Infant Mortality Rate has declined from 86 to 51 during the same period.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Infant Mortality Rate in 2010, was lowest in Goa (10) followed by Kerala (13) and Manipur (14). The States of Madhya Pradesh (62), Orissa (61), Uttar Pradesh (61), Assam (58), Meghalaya (55), Rajasthan (55), Chhattisgarh (51), Bihar (48) and Haryana (48) reported infant mortality rate above the national average (47).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Among infants, the main causes of death are: Certain Conditions Originating in the Perinatal Period (67.2%), Certain infectious and Parasitic diseases (8.3%), Diseases of the Respiratory System (7.7%), Congenial Malformations, Deformations & chromosomal Abnormalities (3.3%), Other causes (10.6%).</p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em><strong>Under Five Mortality Rate </strong></em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Under Five Mortality Rate (Probability of dying between birth and exactly 5 years of age, expressed per 1,000 live births) in India for the year 2010, stands at 59 and it varies from 66 in rural areas to 38 in Urban areas.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Under Five Mortality Rate stood at 64 for females whereas it is 55 for males in 2010.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Under Five Mortality Rate varies from lowest in Kerala (15), followed by 27 in Tamil Nadu to alarmingly high level in Assam (83), followed by Madhya Pradesh (82), Uttar Pradesh (79) and Odisha (78).</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Given to reduce Under Five Mortality Rate to 42 per thousand live births by 2015, India tends to reach near to 52 by that year missing the target by 10 percentage points.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Among children aged 0 to 4 years, the main causes of death are: Certain infectious and Parasitic Diseases (23.1%), Diseases of the Respiratory System (16.1%), Diseases of the Nervous System (12.1%), Diseases of the Circulatory System (7.9%), Injury, Poisoning etc (0.9%), Other major causes (33.9 %).</p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><em><strong>Immunization</strong></em></p> <p style="text-align:justify">• At national level, 61% of the children aged 12-23 months have received full immunization in 2009. The coverage of immunization was higher in urban areas (67.4%) as compared to that in the rural areas (58.5%). </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Nearly 8% Indian children did not receive even a single vaccine in 2009. Nearly 62% of the male children aged 12-23 months have received full immunization, while among the females it was nearly 60%.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• 76.6 percent of children aged 12-23 months received full immunization coverage whose mothers had 12 or more years of education whereas 45.3 percent of children whose mothers had no education got full immunization.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• About 75.5% of children of less than one year belonging to the highest wealth index group are fully immunized while only 47.3% from the lowest quintile are fully immunized.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The full immunization coverage of children age 12-23 months is highest in Goa (87.9%), followed by Sikkim (85.3%), Punjab (83.6%), and Kerala (81.5%). The full immunization coverage is lowest in Arunachal Pradesh (24.8%).</p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to [inside]WHO Global Report: Mortality Attributable to Tobacco (2012)[/inside], please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Mortality%20due%20to%20tobacco.pdf" title="Mortality due to tobacco">click here</a> to access: </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Globally 12% of all deaths among adults aged 30 years and over were attributed to tobacco as compared with 16% in India, 17% in Pakistan and 31% in Bangladesh. </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• In India, the death rate from non-communicable diseases (NCDs) [1096 per 100,000 population] was about 3.3 times that for communicable diseases [336 per 100,000]. Tobacco was responsible for 9% of all NCDs as compared with 2% of all communicable disease related deaths. </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The death rate due to tobacco in Indian men was 206 [per 100,000 men aged 30 years and over] as compared with 13 [per 100,000 women aged 30 years and over] for women. The proportion of deaths attributable to tobacco was almost 12% for men and 1% for women in India. </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Within the NCDs, ischaemic heart disease accounted for 329 deaths per 100,000 population aged 30 years and over, with 5% of these deaths attributed to tobacco in India. Cancer of the trachea, bronchus and lung accounted for 16 deaths per 100,000 population but with 58% of these deaths attributed to tobacco. </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Within the communicable disease group, deaths attributed to tobacco accounted for 5% of all lower respiratory infection deaths and 4% of all tuberculosis deaths in India. </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The regions with the highest proportion of deaths atrributable to tobacco are the Americas and the European regions where tobacco has been used for a longer period of time. </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• 71% of all lung cancer deaths globally are attributable to tobacco use. 42% of all chronic deaths globally are attributable to tobacco use. </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Direct tobacco smoking is currently responsible for the death of about 5 million people worldwide each year with many deaths occuring prematurely. An additional 600,000 people are estimated to die from the effects of second-hand smoke.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• In next 2 decades, the annual death from tobacco globally is expected to rise to over 8 million, with more than 80% of those deaths projected to occur in low-and middle-income countries. </p> <p style="text-align:justify">• If effective measures are not urgently taken, tpbacco could in the 21st century kill over 1 billion people worldwide. Tobacco kills more than tuberculosis, HIV/ AIDS and malaria combined.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to the report titled [inside]The Growing Danger of Non-Communicable Diseases: Acting Now to Reverse Course (2011)[/inside], September, The World Bank, please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/The%20Growing%20Danger%20of%20Non-Communicable%20Diseases.pdf" title="The Growing Danger of Non-Communicable Diseases">click here</a> to access:</p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> • Heart disease, cancer, diabetes, chronic respiratory conditions, and other non-communicable diseases (NCDs) increasingly threaten the physical health and economic security of many lower-and middle-income countries.<br /> <br /> • The change in mortality and disease levels will be particularly substantial in Sub-Saharan Africa, where NCDs will account for 46 percent of all deaths by 2030, up from 28 percent in 2008, and in South Asia, which will see the share of deaths from NCDs increase from 51 to 72 percent during the same period. More than 30 percent of these deaths will be premature and preventable. These lower-income countries will, at the same time, continue to grapple with the widespread prevalence of communicable diseases such as HIV, malaria, tuberculosis, and mother and child conditions, and so face a “double burden” of disease not experienced by their wealthier counterparts.<br /> <br /> • The potential cost of NCDs to economies, health systems, households and individuals in middle- and lower-income countries is high. In many middle- and lower-income countries, NCDs are affecting populations at younger ages, resulting in longer periods of ill-health, premature deaths and greater loss of productivity that is so vital for development.<br /> <br /> • Much of the rise in NCDs in developing countries is attributable to modifiable risk factors such as physical inactivity, malnutrition in the first thousand days of life and later an unhealthy diet (including excessive salt, fat, and sugar intake), tobacco use, alcohol abuse, and exposure to environmental pollution.<br /> <br /> • Country evidence suggests that more than half of the NCD burden could be avoided through effective health promotion and disease prevention programs that tackle such risk factors. Particularly effective at very low costs are measures to curb tobacco, such as taxes, as indicated in the “WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control”, and to reduce salt in processed and semi processed foods.<br /> <br /> • By 2030, cancer incidence is projected to increase by 70 percent in middle-income countries and 82 percent in lower-income countries.<br /> <br /> • While increases in NCD-related mortality and ill-health in part reflect countries’ successes in extending lives and curbing communicable diseases, a significant part of the increase is a result of modifiable risk factors, many of which are linked to modernization, urbanization, and lifestyle changes.<br /> <br /> • The rise of NCDs amongst younger populations may jeopardize many countries’ “demographic dividend”, including the economic benefits expected to be generated during the period when a relatively larger part of the population is of working age. Instead, these countries will have to contend with the costs associated with populations that are living with longer episodes of illhealth.<br /> <br /> • Cardiovascular disease is already a major cause of death and disability in South Asia, where the average age of first-time heart attack sufferers is 53 compared to 59 in the rest of the world.<br /> <br /> • A recent study illustrated the economic impact of NCDs in India by estimating that if NCDs were “eliminated”, the country’s 2004 GDP would have been 4 to 10 percent greater.<br /> <br /> • The share of out-of-pocket household health expenditures on NCDs in India increased from 32 percent to 47 percent between 1995–1996 and 2004. Moreover, 40 percent of these expenditures were financed by borrowing and sales of assets, increasing the household’s financial vulnerability. NCDs also increase the risk of households incurring “catastrophic” health costs. In South Asia, the chance of incurring catastrophic hospitalization expenditures was 160 percent higher for cancer patients and 30 percent higher for those with cardiovascular diseases than it was for those with a communicable disease requiring hospitalization .<br /> <br /> • Because of their specific characteristics, NCDs affect adults—often in their productive years, require costly long term treatment and care, and often are accompanied by some degree of disability. Therefore, they could potentially have greater socio-economic impact than other health conditions. Increased NCD levels can: reduce labor supply and outputs, increase costs to employers (from absenteeism and higher health care coverage costs), lower returns on human capital investments, reduced domestic consumption and lower tax revenues, as well as increased public health and social welfare expenditures.</p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify">**page**</p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify">According to the report titled: [inside]AIDS at 30: Nations at the crossroads (2011)[/inside], which has been brought out by UNAIDS, please <a href="http://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/media_asset/aids-at-30_1.pdf">click here</a> to access: <br /> <br /> • The number of people living with HIV was around 34 million worldwide in 2010.<br /> <br /> • There were 2.6 million new HIV infections worldwide in 2009.<br /> <br /> • Between 1981 and 2000, the number of people living with HIV rose from less than one million to an estimated 27.5 million [26–29 million].<br /> <br /> • Low- and middle-income countries accounted for 95% or more of the global HIV burden by 1998.<br /> <br /> • While less than 1% of adults in South Africa were living with HIV in 1990, 16.1% were living with HIV a decade later. During the same period, adult HIV prevalence rose from less than 1% to 24.5% in Lesotho, and from 3.5% to 26% in Botswana.<br /> <br /> • Half of HIV infections in Eastern Europe and Central Asia in 2010 were due to drug users sharing needles.<br /> <br /> • Clinical trials show that male circumcision reduces the chance of men becoming HIV-positive by about 60%.<br /> <br /> • Beginning in 2005, a series of randomized controlled trials in sub-Saharan Africa found that circumsising adult men reduced their risk of infection by about 60%.<br /> <br /> • Scientific knowledge about HIV expanded steadily in the years 1981–2000. The virus was identified in 1983, and the first serologic test became available in 1985. In the 1990s, studies demonstrated in developed and low- and middle-income countries the possibility of significantly lowering the risk of vertical transmission.<br /> <br /> • Today, 94% of countries (162 of 172 countries reporting) have national HIV strategic plans, up from 87% in 2006. The coordination of national responses also improved during the epidemic’s third decade. Two out of three (67%) countries in 2010 reported having a single HIV monitoring and evaluation system, up from 46% in 2006, although country reports cite insufficient coordination of diverse partners as a continuing challenge to national responses.<br /> <br /> • According to the latest UNGASS reports, AIDS expenditures in 2009 totalled US$ 1.07 billion. Estimates based on the methodology suggested by the Commission on AIDS in Asia indicate that US$ 3.3 billion is needed for a targeted response across the region.<br /> <br /> • There was a significant increase in investment in the HIV response in low- and middle-income countries between 2001 and 2009, with total expenditure rising nearly 10-fold, from US$ 1.6 billion to US$ 15.9 billion.<br /> <br /> • Public and private domestic resources accounted for 52% of total spending on HIV programmes in low- and middle-income countries in 2009, but many low-income countries remain heavily dependent on external financing. In 56 countries, international donors supply at least 70% of HIV resources. This pattern potentially encourages the emergence of new global inequities, as millions of people in sub-Saharan Africa now rely on external donors on a daily basis for the drugs and services that keep them alive.<br /> <br /> • The UNAIDS Domestic Investment Priority Index, a formula that accounts for total HIV burden and government resources, shows that eight of 14 countries in West and Central Africa, six of 16 countries in Eastern and Southern Africa, and all but four countries in Asia were allocating inadequate resources to HIV in 2009.<br /> <br /> • According to research from nine countries under the People Living with HIV Stigma Index, 53% of Rwandans living with HIV have been verbally insulted, 33% of rural Zambians living with HIV have experienced physical violence, and 65% of Rwandans living with HIV have lost a job or income opportunity. Furthermore, women living with HIV from various countries report abuses of their sexual and reproductive health and rights. Nearly 20% of women in Namibia who participated in discussions and interviews with the International Community of Women Living with HIV (ICW), reported that they had been coerced or forced into sterilization. Such deep-seated social ostracism and discriminatory actions discourage people from being tested for HIV or seeking other needed services.<br /> <br /> • Among young women in South Africa, experience of intimate partner violence increases the odds of becoming infected with HIV by 11.9%, while gender inequality within a relationship increases the risk by 13.9%, according to a study reported in The Lancet in 2010.<br /> <br /> • According to the UNAIDS Global Report 2010, the proportion of countries reporting programmes to address stigma and discrimination increased from 39% in 2006 to 92% in 2010, although a budget for these programmes was in place in less than half of these countries.<br /> <br /> • More than 56 countries have laws that specifically criminalize HIV transmission or exposure, with the majority of prosecutions reported in high-income countries. As of April 2011, 47 countries, territories and areas imposed some form of restriction on the entry, stay and residence of people living with HIV. However, in a more positive development, China, Namibia and USA lifted their HIV-related travel restrictions in 2010, while Ecuador and India clarified that no such restrictions were in place.<br /> <br /> • In 116 countries, territories and areas, some aspect of sex work is criminalized. Seventy-nine countries and territories worldwide criminalize consensual same-sex sexual relations, including 85% of countries in Eastern and Southern Africa, 81% in the Middle East and North Africa, and 69% in the Caribbean.<br /> <br /> • Thirty-two countries have laws that allow for the death penalty for drug-related offences, and 27 provide for the compulsory detention of people who use drugs, often without due process or minimum standards of detention or treatment. Such laws, as well as abusive law enforcement and poor access to legal services, deter individuals from seeking needed services, increase their vulnerability to becoming HIV-positive, and intensify their social isolation.<br /> <br /> • As of December 2010, an estimated 6.6 million people in low- and middle-income countries were receiving antiretroviral therapy, an increase of 1.4 million from a year earlier. Between 2001 and 2010, the number of people receiving antiretroviral treatment rose nearly 22-fold, a vivid illustration of the power of international solidarity, innovative approaches and people-centred responses.<br /> <br /> • In sub-Saharan Africa the number of people receiving antiretroviral treatment in 2010 increased by 31%; in the Middle East and North Africa, that figure was 21%.<br /> <br /> • As of December 2009, seven countries had already reached at least 80% of treatment-eligible individuals with antiretroviral treatment. Eighteen countries reported treatment coverage of at least 60%.<br /> <br /> • Since its emergence in 1996, highly active anti retroviral therapy has saved an estimated 14.4 million life years worldwide as of December 2009. Although 54% of life-years saved between 1995 and 2009 were in Western Europe and North America, where antiretroviral therapy has long been available, 3.7 million life-years have been saved in sub-Saharan Africa. The pace of reducing morbidity and mortality in sub-Saharan Africa has accelerated since 2005 as a result of dramatic programme scale-up.<br /> <br /> • In 2009, nearly one in five people (18%) who started antiretroviral therapy in low- and middle-income countries were no longer in care 12 months later.<br /> <br /> • At present, more than 95% of patients on treatment are on first-generation antiretroviral medicines, the majority of which are off-patent. As drug resistance increases over time, more patients will require second- and third-generation medicines. Most of these more recent medicines will remain under patent protection for years to come, resulting in potentially drastic increases in treatment costs. This can be alleviated to a large extent by making use of the flexibilities of public health related TRIPS (trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights). In March 2011, UNAIDS, WHO and UNDP issued a policy brief calling on all countries to use TRIPS flexibilities to lower costs and improve access to HIV treatment. By 2005, five years after affordable means of preventing vertical transmission became available, only 15% of HIV-positive pregnant women in low- and middle-income countries received antiretroviral prophylaxis.<br /> <br /> • More than 50% of pregnant women who tested positive for HIV in 2010 were assessed for their eligibility to receive antiretroviral therapy for their own health. These gains in reducing vertical transmission have helped to reduce childhood mortality. The number of children newly infected with HIV in 2009 (370 000 [230 000–510 000]) was 26% lower than in 2001.<br /> <br /> • According to the most recent population-based surveys in low- and middle-income countries with available data, only 24% of young women and 36% of young men responded correctly when asked five questions about HIV prevention methods and popular misconceptions about HIV transmission. Young women tend to be less likely than young men to be aware of the prevention benefits of consistent condom use. When prompted, 74% of young males in DHS surveys knew that using a condom helps to prevent HIV infection, while only 49% of young females knew the right answer. Some 78% of young males also knew that having a single, faithful partner lowers the risk of HIV infection, compared to only 59% of young females.<br /> <br /> • In 14 countries where HIV prevalence exceeds 2% and where nationally representative data are available, more than 70% of men and women who had high-risk sex in the past year report not using a condom the last time they had sex.<br /> <br /> • Globally, HIV prevalence levels above those reported in the general population have been documented among men who have sex with men (MSM), transgender people, people who inject drugs (IDUs), and sex workers.<br /> <br /> • According to the most recently available data, the proportion of countries reporting that they conduct systematic surveillance of HIV among key populations increased between 2008 and 2010: for sex workers, from 44% to 50%; for MSM, from 30% to 36%; while among IDUs it remained stable at 28%.<br /> <br /> • An estimated 20% of the 15.9 million IDUs worldwide are living with HIV. This statistic underscores the world’s failure to put the lessons of harm reduction to use. In at least 69 countries where injecting drug use has been documented, no programme to provide even sterile needles and syringes exists.<br /> <br /> • The epidemic among MSM communities is a worldwide phenomenon, with 63 out of 67 countries reporting in 2009 a higher HIV prevalence among MSM compared with the general population.<br /> <br /> • At least 79 countries, territories and areas have laws against male–male sexual contact, including some that authorize the death penalty.<br /> <br /> • Among 56 countries reporting in both 2008 and 2010, median condom use with the most recent client reached 84%, with a range from about two thirds to nearly 100%.<br /> <br /> • According to recent estimates, HIV is a leading cause of pregnancyrelated deaths, accounting for about 11% of all maternal deaths in 2008.<br /> <br /> • HIV-positive newborns have about a 50% risk of death before age two in the absence of treatment.<br /> <br /> • In 2009, HIV accounted for 2.1% (1.2–3.0%) of under-five deaths in low- and middle-income countries, a decline from 2.6% (1.6–3.5%) in 2000.<br /> <br /> • In sub-Saharan Africa, HIV was responsible for 3.6% (2.0–5.0%) of all deaths in children under five in 2009. Here, too, striking achievements are evident, as the HIV share of all under-five deaths has sharply fallen from the 5.4% (3.3%–7.3%) reported in 2000.<br /> <br /> • Universal access to effective prevention, diagnosis and treatment for HIV-related tuberculosis (TB) could prevent up to one million TB deaths in people living with HIV between now and 2015, but the world is falling far short of this target.<br /> <br /> • Only 28% of TB patients globally knew their HIV status in 2009, and only 5% of people living with HIV were screened for TB. Although early initiation of antiretroviral therapy significantly reduces the risk of death among HIV-positive people with TB, only 37% of these HIV-positive TB patients got HIV therapy in 2009.<br /> <br /> • According to data compiled by WHO, 10 countries accounted for more than 69% of all people with HIV-related TB in 2009.<br /> <br /> • 25% of all TB deaths are in people with HIV, and there are one million cases of TB in people with HIV a year.<br /> <br /> • Between 2001 and 2009, global HIV incidence steadily declined, with the annual rate of new infections falling by nearly 25%.<br /> <br /> • Above-average declines in HIV incidence have occurred in sub-Saharan Africa and in South and South-East Asia, while Latin America and the Caribbean and Oceania regions experienced more modest reductions of less than 25%.<br /> <br /> • Rates of new infections have remained relatively stable in East Asia, Western and Central Europe, and North America. HIV incidence has steadily increased in the Middle East and North Africa, while in Eastern Europe and Central Asia, a decline in new infections was reversed mid-decade, with incidence rising slightly from 2005 to 2009.<br /> <br /> • Coverage of services to prevent new child infections increased from 15% in 2005 to 54% in 2009. The HIV incidence rate declined by more than 25% between 2001 and 2009. Antiretroviral treatment coverage is increasing.<br /> <br /> • Some 22.5 million people now live with HIV in Africa. The majority (60%) are women and girls. HIV prevalence is as high as 25% in some countries, and the rate of people becoming newly infected outpaces treatment access. Of the 16.6 million children globally who have lost one or both parents to an AIDS-related illness, 14.9 million are in Africa.<br /> <br /> • The Asia Pacific region has made significant progress in controlling HIV’s spread. The number of people living with HIV has remained stable for the past five years and estimated new infections are 20% lower than in 2001. Thailand, Cambodia and certain parts of India have turned their epidemics around by providing quality services to their key populations at higher risk.<br /> <br /> • In 2009, median reported prevention coverage for people who inject drugs was 17%; for men who have sex with men 36.5%; and for female sex workers 41%. Programmes in key affected populations to prevent transmission to intimate sexual partners are severely lacking.<br /> <br /> **page**<br /> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Please <a href="https://im4change.org/hunger-hdi/sdgs-113.html?pgno=5#trends-in-maternal-mortality-1990-to-2008-estimates">click here</a> to access the Trends in Maternal Mortality: 1990 to 2008 Estimates developed by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA and The World Bank:</span><br /> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">According to [inside]A Fair Chance at Life: Why Equity Matters for Children (2010)[/inside], which has been prepared by Save the Children, please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/A%20fair%20chance%20of%20life.pdf" title="A fair chance of life">click here</a> to access:</span><br /> <span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"> </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• In 2000, the world’s governments committed themselves to make a two-thirds reduction in the child mortality rate by 2015 – the fourth of eight United Nations Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). But with five years to go before the target date, the world is collectively off track to reach MDG 4. Just 40% of the necessary progress has been achieved so far, and in three-quarters of countries the goal will be missed on current trends. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• The child mortality rate at a global level has fallen by just 28% since the MDG baseline year of 1990, far short of the 67% reduction required to meet the goal. Less than 30% of countries are making equitable progress towards MDG 4.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Ghana, Mozambique, Niger, Egypt, Indonesia, Bolivia and Zambia have made equitable progress in reducing child mortality. Chad, Congo, Kenya, South Africa and Zimbabwe have actually seen increases in their child mortality rates since 1990. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• In sub-Saharan Africa, close to one child in seven still dies before their fifth birthday. Although the mortality rate in sub-Saharan Africa has fallen, high fertility levels mean that the absolute number of child deaths in the region has increased since 1990, from 4.2 to 4.6 million.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Almost all child deaths – 99% – happen in the developing world. A person born in sub-Saharan Africa can expect to live, on average, 52 years. In western Europe, life expectancy is 80 years. The life expectancy rates in sub-Saharan Africa today have not been seen in Europe since the beginning of the 20th century. In 40 developing countries, children have less chance of living to the age of five than a person in the UK has of living to the age of 65.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Sri Lanka – with a per capita income of $1,790 – has a child mortality rate of 13, less than half the level in Guatemala, which has a per capita income of $2,680. Gabon has an equivalent per capita income to Argentina, but a child mortality rate of 57, almost four times higher.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• In India, high levels of selective abortion contribute to skewed male-to-female birth ratios. Son preference in India and China can result in high mortality among girls because they are not adequately breastfed or given the same access to medical treatment. A study of 4,000 children aged between one and two in India found that the likelihood of girls being fully vaccinated was five percentage points lower than that for boys. In Gujarat, India, 50% of women feel they need the permission of their husband or parent-in-law before taking their sick child to a doctor.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• High child mortality, illness and malnutrition can be a brake on economic and social development. Children who are sick and undernourished, especially in the first two years of life, often pay a life-long and irreversible price in terms of physical stunting and reduced cognitive ability.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• On the positive side, of the 68 ‘Countdown to 2015’ countries (which together account for 97% of maternal and child deaths worldwide), 60 have reduced child mortality since 1990. A recent study found that the rate of reduction has accelerated since 2000, compared with the period from 1990 to 2000.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Of the 68 ‘Countdown to 2015’ priority countries, only 19 are on-track to reach MDG 4. Eleven more are making faster-than-average progress, but still not enough progress to achieve MDG 4 by 2015.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• It is estimated that children under five make up 85% of those who die as a result of climate change; 44% of child deaths happen in countries considered fragile; and nearly 70% of the countries with the highest child mortality burden are currently experiencing or have experienced armed violence in the last two decades.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Inadequate care before birth and during delivery contributes to 40% of child deaths. Even babies who survive the neonatal period (up to 28 days) have greatly reduced chances of surviving beyond the age of five if their mothers die, in part because they are less likely to receive adequate nutrition and healthcare.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Although the percentage of stunted children decreased globally from 40% to 27% between 1990 and 2010, the number of stunted children is projected to increase in many areas. In Africa, the number of stunted children is estimated to have increased from 45 million in 1990 to 60 million in 2010.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Undernutrition among pregnant women in developing countries leads to one in six infants being born with low birth weight, which not only carries a high risk of neonatal death, but can also permanently damage long-term cognitive and physical development.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Infectious diseases accounted for an estimated 68% of the 8.8 million child deaths in 2008, with pneumonia accounting for 18% and diarrhoea for 15% of the global total. More than 40% of deaths from pneumonia and diarrhoea take place in sub-Saharan Africa, where 42% of people lack access to an improved water source, and almost 70% are without adequate sanitation.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Improved drinking water sources and proper sanitation are crucial to reducing child deaths from diarrhoea, while an estimated 45% of cases could be prevented by simple hand washing with soap.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• If women and men had equal status, it is estimated that the proportion of underweight children below the age of three years would fall by 13 percentage points globally.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">According to [inside]Women on the Front Lines of Health Care, State of the World's Mothers 2010[/inside], </span><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Women%20on%20the%20front%20line.pdf" title="Women on the front line">click here</a> to access</span><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">: </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Every year, 50 million women in the developing world give birth with no professional help and 8.8 million children and newborns die from easily preventable or treatable causes. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Worldwide, there are 57 countries with critical health workforce shortages, meaning that they have fewer than 23 doctors, nurses and midwives per 10,000 people. Thirty-six of these countries are in sub-Saharan Africa. Making up for these shortages would require an additional 2.4 million doctors, nurses and midwives.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Thirty-six of the countries with critical health worker shortages are in sub-Saharan Africa, which has 12 percent of the world’s population, 25 percent of the global burden of disease, and only 3 percent of the world’s health workers. South and East Asia have 29 percent of the disease burden and only 12 percent of the health workers.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• 41 percent of the child deaths occur among newborn babies in the first month of life.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• 99 percent of child and maternal deaths occur in developing countries where mothers and children lack access to basic health-care services.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• 250,000 women’s lives and 5.5 million children’s lives could be saved each year if all women and children had access to a full package of essential health care.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Every year 8.8 million children die before reaching age 5.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Every year 343,000 women lose their lives due to pregnancy or childbirth complications.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• An additional 4.3 million health workers are needed in developing countries to help save lives and meet the health-related Millennium Development Goals.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• The eleventh annual Mothers’ Index helps document conditions for mothers and children in 160 countries – 43 developed nations and 117 in the developing world – and shows where mothers fare best and where they face the greatest hardships.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• European countries – along with New Zealand and Australia – dominate the top positions while countries in sub-Saharan Africa dominate the lowest tier.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">According to [inside]Performance Audit-Report No. 8 of 2009-10[/inside], please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Performace%20Audit.pdf" title="Performance audit NRHM">click here</a> to access:</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• This is the latest and an extremely significant report on the status and performance of the National Rural Health Mission (NRHM) all over India providing clues for areas of concern and immediate action. Some of the salient features are as follows:</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• The performance audit on implementation of the NRHM was conducted during April-December 2008 in the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, State Health Societies (SHS) of 33 States/UTs, District Health Societies (DHS) of 129 districts and 2369 health centres at block and village levels covering the period from 2005-06 to 2007-08.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• The NRHM initiated decentralised bottom-up planning. This, however, had been hindered by non-completion of household and facility surveys and State specific perspective plans. In nine States, district level annual plans were not prepared during 2005-08 and in 24 States/UTs block and village level annual plans had not been prepared at all.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Village level health and sanitation committees were still to be constituted in nine States. The Rogi Kalyan Samitis (RKS) formed at many health centres, aiming at community ownership of healthcare delivery systems, were characterised by weak or absent grievance redressal mechanisms, outreach and awareness generation efforts.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• No RKS in any State/UT received all the stipulated central grants. In 13 States/UTs, the Samiti failed to generate internal resources, while in the remaining States no mechanism existed to monitor the generation of a third of the RKS funds from internal resources as prescribed.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• The participation of Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs) in the Mission’s activities had not been facilitated and their contribution towards capacity building and service delivery was not effectively monitored. 71 per cent of the districts countrywide were yet to be covered under the Mother NGO scheme.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• During the period 2005-06 to 2007-08, the total outlay/expenditure on the NRHM was Rs. 24,151.45 crore. During the first two years the Centre was contributing 100 per cent of the funds. Thereafter, the States were to contribute 15 per cent of funds during the 11th Five Year Plan (2007-12). However, many of the States were yet to contribute their share to the Mission and this issue needs to be addressed. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Many high focus States where diseases are endemic and health indicators poor, were however, receiving relatively lesser central grants, as high unspent balances of previous years remained, indicating that capacity building needs to be focused on.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Basic facilities (proper buildings, hygienic environment, electricity and water supply etc.) were still absent in many existing health centres with many Primary Health Centres (PHCs) and Community Health Centres (CHCs) being unable to provide guaranteed services such as inpatient services, operation theatres, labour rooms, pathological tests, X-ray facilities and emergency care etc.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• While contract workers have been engaged to fill vacancies, there are still shortages of specialist doctors at CHCs, adequate staff nurses at CHCs/PHCs and Auxiliary Nursing Midwife (ANMs)/ Multi-purpose Worker (MPWs) at Sub Centres.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• In nine States, the stock of essential drugs, contraceptives and vaccines adequate for two months consumption as required under norms were not available in any of the test checked PHCs and CHCs.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Despite holding two National Immunisation Days, six Special National Immunisation Days (and additional rounds in selected districts of Bihar and Uttar Pradesh), 1640 new polio cases had been detected in 17 States/UTs during 2005-08.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> <span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">According to [inside]‘Diarrhoea: Why children are still dying and what can be done?’ (2009)[/inside], please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/Diarrhoea%20Why%20children%20are%20still%20dying%20and%20what%20can%20be%20done.pdf" title="Diarrhoea Why children are still dying and what can be done">click here</a> to access:</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Diarrhoea is defined as having loose or watery stools at least three times per day, or more frequently than normal for an individual. Though most episodes of childhood diarrhoea are mild, acute cases can lead to death and other complications. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• The leading cause of diarrhea is lack of sanitation and safe drinking water and the life threatening disease is very easily curable with simple tablets and rehydration. (An estimated 88 per cent of diarrhoeal deaths worldwide are attributable to unsafe water, inadequate sanitation and poor hygiene.)</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Most pathogens that cause diarrhoea share a similar mode of transmission – from the stool of one person to the mouth of another.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• In India, under-five mortality rate (per 1000 live births) was 69 during 2008. The number of under-five deaths was 18,30,000 during 2008. The percentage of children under-five with diarrhoea receiving ORS packet during 2005-2008 was 26%.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Nearly, nine million children under five years of age die each year. Diarrhoea is second only to pneumonia as the cause of these deaths.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Reducing these deaths depends largely on delivering life-saving treatment of low-osmolarity oral rehydration salts (ORS) and zinc tablets to all children in need.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Examples of rehydrating fluids include cereal-based drinks made from a thin gruel of rice, maize, potato or other readily available low-cost grain or root crop the family has at home. Breastmilk is also an excellent drink for fluid replacement and should continue to be given to infants with diarrhoea simultaneously with other oral rehydration solutions.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• According to the latest available figures, an estimated 2.5 billion people lack improved sanitation facilities, and nearly one billion people do not have access to safe drinking water. These unsanitary environments allow diarrhoea-causing pathogens to spread more easily.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Globally, 1.2 billion people practise open defecation, 83 per cent of whom live in 13 countries</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Together, pneumonia and diarrhoea are responsible for an estimated 40 per cent of all child deaths around the world each year.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Nearly 1 in 4 people in developing countries were practising indiscriminate or open defecation in 2006.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Nearly one in five child deaths – about 1.5 million each year – is due to diarrhoea. It kills more young children than AIDS, malaria and measles combined.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Between 1990 and 2006, the proportion of the developing world’s population using an improved drinking water source rose from 71 per cent to 84 per cent. Still, almost 1 billion people lack access to improved drinking water sources, and many households do not treat or safely store their household water supplies.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• The prevention package highlights five main elements that require a concerted approach in their implementation. The package includes: a) rotavirus and measles vaccinations, b) promotion of early and exclusive breastfeeding and vitamin A supplementation, c) promotion of handwashing with soap, d) improved water supply quantity and quality, including treatment and safe storage of household water, and e) community-wide sanitation promotion.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Mortality from diarrhoea has declined over the past two decades from an estimated 5 million deaths among children under five to 1.5 million deaths in 2004 </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Africa and South Asia are home to more than 80 per cent of child deaths due to diarrhoea</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Improving sanitation facilities has been associated with an estimated median reduction in diarrhoea incidence of 36 per cent across reviewed studies.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Interventions to improve water quality at the source, along with treatment of household water and safe storage systems, have been shown to reduce diarrhoea incidence by as much as 47 per cent.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Diarrhoea often leads to stunting in children due to its association with poor nutrient absorption and appetite loss.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Breastmilk contains the nutrients, antioxidants, hormones and antibodies needed by a child to survive and develop.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Undernourished children are more likely to suffer from diarrhoea and its consequences, which, in turn, increases their chances of worsening nutritional status. Today, 129 million children under the age of five in the developing world are underweight for their age. Together, Africa and South Asia account for more than 80 per cent of total underweight children (25 per cent and 57 per cent, respectively). About 40 per cent of children under five years of age are stunted in Africa, and nearly half in South Asia.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Only 37 per cent of infants in developing countries are exclusively breastfed for the first six months of life.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Boys and girls are equally likely to receive ORS to treat diarrhoea. Children in urban areas (39 percent) are more likely to receive ORS than those living in rural areas (31 per cent). Similarly, children from the wealthiest families are 1.5 times as likely to receive ORS to treat their diarrhoea as the poorest children</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">**page**<em> </em></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">According to the [inside]World Health Statistics 2009[/inside], please <a href="tinymce/uploaded/World%20Health%20Statistics%202009.pdf" title="World Health Statistics 2009">click here</a> to access:</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"> </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• The proportion of under-nourished children under five years of age declined from 27% in 1990 to 20% in 2005. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Some 27% fewer children died before their fifth birthday in 2007 than in 1990. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Maternal mortality has barely changed since 1990. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• One third of 9.7 million people in developing countries who need treatment for HIV/AIDS were receiving it in 2007. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• MDG target for reducing the incidence of tuberculosis was met globally in 2004. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• 27 countries reported a reduction of up to 50% in the number of malaria cases between 1990 and 2006. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• The number of people with access to safe drinking-water rose from 4.1 billion in 1990 to 5.7 billion in 2006. About 1.1 billion people in developing regions gained access to improved sanitation in the same period. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Globally, the proportion of children under five years of age suffering from under-nutrition, according to WHO Child Growth Standards, declined from 27% in 1990 to 20% in 2005. But, the progress is uneven, and an estimated 112 million children are underweight. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Globally, the number of children who die before their fifth birthday has been reduced by 27% from 12.5 million estimated in 1990 to 9 million in 2007. This reduction is due to a combination of interventions, including the use of insecticide-treated mosquito nets for malaria, oral rehydration therapy for diarrhoea, increased access to vaccines for a number of infectious diseases and improved water and sanitation. But pneumonia and diarrhoea continue to kill 3.8 million children aged under five each year, although both conditions are preventable and treatable.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• The global maternal mortality ratio of 400 maternal deaths per 100 000 live births in 2005 has barely changed since 1990. Every year an estimated 536 000 women die in pregnancy or childbirth. Most of these deaths occur in sub-Saharan Africa where the maternal mortality ratio is 900 per 100 000 births and where there has been no measurable improvement since 1990. A woman in Africa may face a 1-in-26 lifetime risk of death during pregnancy and childbirth, compared with only 1 in 7300 in the developed regions. 1 There are, however, signs of progress in some countries in Asia and Latin America and the Caribbean.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• The percentage of adults living with HIV worldwide has remained stable since 2000 but there were an estimated 2.7 million new infections during 2007. Moreover, deaths are increasing in parts of Africa, particularly eastern and southern Africa. The use of antiretroviral therapy has increased; in 2007, about 1 million more people living with HIV received the treatment. That means one third of the estimated 9.7 million people in developing countries who need the treatment were receiving it. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• The MDG target for reducing the incidence of tuberculosis was met globally in 2004. Since then, incidence has continued to fall slowly. Thanks to early detection of new cases and effective treatment using the WHO-recommended DOTS treatment strategy, treatment success rates have been consistently improving, with rates rising from 79% in 1990 to 85% in 2006. Multi-drug resistant tuberculosis is a challenge in countries, such as those of the former Soviet Union, while the lethal combination of HIV and tuberculosis is an issue particularly for sub-Saharan African countries. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Efforts to control malaria are beginning to pay off with significant increases in the proportion of children sleeping under insecticide-treated mosquito nets. Although it is still too early to register the global impact, 27 countries – including five in Africa – have reported a reduction of up to 50% in malaria cases between 1990 and 2006. In 2006, the number of cases was estimated to be 250 million globally. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Progress has been made in treating neglected tropical diseases that affect some 1.2 billion people. For example, only 9585 cases of dracunculiasis (guinea-worm disease) were reported in the five countries where the disease is endemic, compared with an estimated 3.5 million reported in 20 such countries in 1985. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• The number of people with access to safe drinking water rose from an estimated 4.1 billion in 1990 to 5.7 billion in 2006. But 900 million people still had to rely on water from what are known as unimproved sources, for example surface water or an unprotected dug well.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Since 1990, an estimated 1.1 billion people in developing regions have gained access to improved sanitation. In 1990, just under 3 billion people had access to sanitation. Their number rose to more than 4 billion by 2006. Yet, in 2006 some 2.5 billion did not have access to improved sanitation and 1.2 billion had to practise open defecation. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">• Although nearly all developing countries publish an essential medicines list, the availability of medicines at public health facilities is often poor. Surveys in about 30 developing countries show that availability of selected medicines at health facilities was only 35% in the public sector and 63% in the private sector. Lack of medicines in the public sector often means patients have no choice but to purchase them privately or do without treatment. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">According to [inside]National Family Health Survey-III (2005-06)[/inside], </span><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">please <a href="http://rchiips.org/NFHS/nfhs3.shtml" title="http://rchiips.org/NFHS/nfhs3.shtml">click here</a> to access:<br /> <br /> <u><strong>NFHS III reports declining status of nutrition amidst women</strong></u></span><br /> </p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">The NFHS III paints a mixed picture of India’s overall reproductive health status. Women are having fewer children and infant mortality has dropped in the seven-year period since the last NFHS survey in 1998-99. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Anaemia and malnutrition are still widespread among children and adults. And, in an unusual juxtaposition, more adults, especially urban women, are overweight or obese than they were seven years ago. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> <span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:medium"><u><strong>Trend in Family Planning and Fertility</strong></u> </span></span><br /> </p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Fertility has continued to decline since NFHS-2, dropping to an average of 2.7 children from 2.9 children. Ten states, mostly in Southern India, have reached replacement level or below replacement level fertility. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">While son preference remains a barrier to more rapid decline in fertility, an increasing number of women who have only daughters say that they want no more children. In NFHS-3, 62% of women with two daughters and no sons say they want no more children, compared with 47% in NFHS-2. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Declining fertility could be attributed largely to women’s increased use of contraception. For the first time ever, more than half of currently married women in India are using contraception, and their use of modern contraceptive methods increased from 43% to 49% between NFHS-2 and NFHS-3. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">A rise in the average age at marriage is also contributing to the drop in fertility. Forty-five percent of women ages 20-24 were married before the legal age of marriage of 18 years, compared with 50% seven years earlier. This shift in age at marriage also influences the median age at first birth, which increased by six months to 19.8 years. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify"><br /> <span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:medium"><u><strong>Half of Women Lack Proper Care during Pregnancy and Delivery</strong></u></span></span><br /> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:medium">• More than three-quarters of pregnant women in India received at least some antenatal care (ANC), but only half of women had at least three ANC visits with a health provider during their pregnancy. </span></span></p> <p style="text-align:justify">• The disparity between urban and rural women was especially pronounced, with 74% of urban women having ANC at least three times, compared with 43% of rural women. Births assisted by a health professional increased to 49% from 42%, with 75% of urban women but only 39% of rural women in NFHS-3 received assistance from a health professional.</p> <p style="text-align:justify">• Institutional births increased from 34% to 41%, but most women still deliver their children at home. Only about one-third of women received postnatal care within two days of delivery.<br /> <br /> <span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><u><strong>Infant Mortality Drops, but Full Immunization Coverage Shows Little Progress</strong></u></span></span></span></p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Infant mortality continues to decline, dropping from 68 in 1998-99 to 57 in 2005-06 per thousand births. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">There were particularly notable drops in the infant mortality rate in Bihar, Goa, Haryana, Jammu and Kashmir, Meghalaya, Orissa, Punjab, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, and Uttar Pradesh. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Overall, there was only a marginal improvement in full vaccination coverage, with 44% of children ages 12-23 months receiving all recommended vaccinations, up from 42% seven years earlier. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Substantial improvements in coverage have been made in all vaccinations except DPT, which did not change at all between NFHS-2 and NFHS-3. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Gains are particularly evident for polio vaccination coverage, but nearly one-quarter of children age 12-23 months did not receive three recommended doses. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Progress in vaccination coverage varies markedly among the states. In 11 states, there has been a substantial deterioration in full immunization coverage in the last seven years, due to a decline in vaccination coverage for both DPT and polio. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Large decline were seen in Maharashtra, Mizoram, Andhra Pradesh, and Punjab. On the other hand, there was major improvement in full immunization coverage in Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Sikkim, and West Bengal. Other states with marked improvements in full immunization coverage were Assam, Haryana, Jammu and Kashmir, Madhya Pradesh, Meghalaya, and Uttaranchal. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">Diarrhoea continues to be a major health problem for many children. Although knowledge about Oral Rehydration Salts (ORS) for the treatment of diarrhoea is widespread among mothers, only 58% of children with diarrhoea were taken to a health facility, down from 65% seven years earlier. </span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <ul> <li> <div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">There has been a rise in the number of dispensaries and hospitals, nursing personnel and doctors (including primary health care centers) in between 1991 and 2005/06, as could be deciphered from the table below.</span></div> </li> </ul> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> <p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:medium"><u><strong>Trends in health care infrastructure</strong></u> </span></span></p> <div> <table align="justify" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="2" style="height:96px; width:417px"> <caption> <p style="text-align:justify"> </p> </caption> <tbody> <tr> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"> </span></td> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:medium"><strong>1991 </strong></span></span></td> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:medium"> <strong>2005/2006</strong></span></span></td> </tr> <tr> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"> SC/PHC/CHC (March 2006)</span></td> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"> 57353</span></td> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"> 171567</span></td> </tr> <tr> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"> Dispensaries and Hospitals (all) (1.4.2006)</span></td> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"> 23555</span></td> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"> 32156</span></td> </tr> <tr> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"> Nursing Personnel (2005)</span></td> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"> 143887</span></td> <td style="text-align:justify; vertical-align:middle"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"> 1481270</span></td> </tr> <tr> </tr> </tbody> </table> </div> ', 'credit_writer' => '', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 10, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'public-health-51', 'meta_title' => '', 'meta_keywords' => '', 'meta_description' => '', 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 51, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 21 $metaTitle = 'Hunger / HDI | Public Health' $metaKeywords = '' $metaDesc = 'KEY TRENDS • The 2019 India TB report says that the country accounted for a quarter of the global tuberculosis (TB) burden with an estimated 27 lakh cases in 2018. In 2018, the country was able to achieve a total notification of 21.5 lakh TB cases, of which...' $disp = '<p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium">KEY TRENDS </span></p><p style="text-align:justify"> </p><div style="text-align:justify">• The 2019 India TB report says that the country accounted for a quarter of the global tuberculosis (TB) burden with an estimated 27 lakh cases in 2018. In 2018, the country was able to achieve a total notification of 21.5 lakh TB cases, of which 25 percent was from private sector. Majority of the TB burden is among the working age group. Nearly 89 percent of TB cases came from the age group 15-69 years. About 2/3rd of the TB patients were males <strong>*15</strong></div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><div style="text-align:justify">• Maternal Mortality Ratio for India was 370 in 2000, 286 in 2005, 210 in 2010, 158 in 2015 and 145 in 2017. Therefore, the MMRatio for the country reduced by almost 61 percent between 2000 and 2017. MMRatio for China was 59 in 2000, 44 in 2005, 36 in 2010, 30 in 2015 and 29 in 2017. Therefore, the MMRatio for China fell by around 51 percent between 2000 and 2017 <strong>*14</strong> <br /> </div><div style="text-align:justify">• The per capita public expenditure (actual) on health in nominal terms has gone up from Rs. 621 in 2009-10 to Rs. 1,112 in 2015-16. Public expenditure on health (includes health sector expenditure by Centre and States/UTs) as a percentage of GDP was 1.02 percent in 2015-16. There is no significant change in public expenditure on health as a percentage of GDP since 2009-10. The Centre-State share in total public expenditure on health was 31:69 in 2015-16, which used to be 36:64 in 2009-10 <strong>*13</strong><br /><br />• The North-Eastern states had the highest (viz. Rs. 2,878 per capita) and Empowered Action Group (EAG) states (including Assam) had the lowest (viz. Rs. 871 per capita) average per capita public expenditure on health in 2015-16 (excluding UTs). The North-Eastern states had the highest public health expenditure as a percentage of Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP) in 2015-16 (2.76 percent). Public health expenditure as a percentage of GSDP stood at 1.36 percent for EAG states (including Assam) and 0.76 percent for major non-EAG states <strong>*13</strong></div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><div style="text-align:justify">• Of the total disease burden in India in 1990, a tenth was caused by a group of risks including unhealthy diet, high blood pressure, high blood sugar, high cholesterol, and overweight, which mainly contribute to ischaemic heart disease, stroke, and diabetes. The contribution of this group of risks increased massively to a quarter of the total disease burden in India in 2016 <strong>*12</strong><br /><br />• The Out-of-Pocket Expenditure (OOPE) on health by households is Rs. 3,02,425 crores (62.6 percent of total health expenditure, 2.4 percent of GDP, Rs. 2,394 per capita) for the year 2014-15. Private Health Insurance expenditure is Rs. 17,755 crores (3.7 percent of total health expenditure) for the year 2014-15 <strong>*11</strong><br /><br />• Based on available evidence, cardiovascular disease (24 percent), chronic respiratory disease (11 percent), cancer (6 percent) and diabetes (2 percent) are the leading cause of mortality in India <strong>*10</strong><br /> </div><div style="text-align:justify">• The total number of dengue cases in India has grown from 28,292 in 2010 to 40,425 in 2014. The total number of dengue related deaths stood at 131 in 2014 <strong>*10</strong></div><div style="text-align:justify"><br />• The Proportion (per 1000) of Ailing Persons (PAP), measured as the number of living persons reporting ailments (per 1000 persons), was 89 persons in rural India and 118 persons in urban India <strong>*9</strong><br /> </div><div style="text-align:justify">• Private doctors were the most important single source of non-hospitalized treatment in both the sectors (Rural & Urban). More than 70% (72 per cent in the rural areas and 79 per cent in the urban areas) spells of ailment were treated in the private sector (consisting of private doctors, nursing homes, private hospitals, charitable institutions, etc.) <strong>*9</strong></div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><div style="text-align:justify">• It is observed that in rural India, 42 percent hospitalised treatment was carried out in public hospital and rest 58 percent in private hospital. For the urban India, the corresponding figures were 32 percent and 68 percent. It may be noted in this context that households (or persons within households) were segregated in sector (rural/urban) by their place of domicile, and not by the place of treatment <strong>*9</strong></div><p style="text-align:justify"> </p><div style="text-align:justify">• Average medical expenditure per hospitalisation case: Higher amount was spent for treatment per hospitalised case by people in the private hospitals (Rs. 25850) than in the public hospitals (Rs. 6120). The highest expenditure was recorded for treatment of Cancer (Rs. 56712) followed by that for Cardio-vascular diseases (Rs. 31647). Average medical expenditure per non-hospitalisation case was Rs. 509 in rural India and Rs. 639 in urban India <strong>*9</strong><br /><br />• As much as 86 percent of rural population and 82 percent of urban population were still not covered under any scheme of health expenditure support. Government, however, was able to bring about 12 percent urban and 13 percent rural population under health protection coverage through Rastriya Swasthya Bima Yojana (RSBY) or similar plan. Only 12 percent households of the 5th quintile class (Usual Monthly Per Capita Consumer Expenditure) of urban area had some arrangement of medical insurance from private provider <strong>*9</strong></div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><div style="text-align:justify">• The draft National Health Policy 2015 proposes a potentially achievable target of raising public health expenditure to 2.5% of the GDP. It also notes that 40% of this would need to come from Central expenditures. At current prices, a target of 2.5% of GDP translates to Rs. 3800 per capita, representing an almost four fold increase in five years <strong>*8</strong><br /> <br />• Maternal mortality ratio (MMR)* in India stood at 560 maternal deaths (per 100000 live births) during 1990, 460 during 1995, 370 during 2000, 280 during 2005 and 190 during 2013. India could reduce MMR by 65 percent between 1990 and 2013<strong> *7</strong><br /><br />• At the country level, the two countries that accounted for one third of all global maternal deaths are India at 17 percent (50000) and Nigeria at 14 percent (40000)<strong> *7</strong><br /><br />• U5MR in India declined by 55 percent from 126 in 1990 to 56 in 2012. Infant Mortality Rate declined from 88 in 1990 to 44 in 2012. Neonatal mortality rate declined from 51 in 1990 to 31 in 2012. U5MR in India among boys declined from 121 in 1990 to 54 in 2012. U5MR in India among girls declined from 130 in 1990 to 59 in 2012. The share of neonatal deaths in under-five deaths stood at 55 percent in 2012 as compared to 41 percent in 1990 <strong>*6</strong><br /><br />• Pneumonia is the leading cause of child mortality in India, responsible for the deaths of nearly 400,000 children under five in 2010 <strong>*5</strong><br /><br />• The Indian Commission on Macroeconomics and Health notes that, in India, 13 household person-days per patient were lost per episode of malaria. Furthermore, the commission estimated that the overall monetary losses to families (income losses together with treatment expenses) could amount to between 200 and 400 Indian rupees (US$ 3.5 to 7) <strong>*4</strong><br /><br />• Odisha is one of the most highly malaria-endemic states in India, accounting for 24% of reported cases in 2010 despite consisting of less of than 4% of the national population. Malaria is particularly common among tribal groups which represent 44% of the population of Orissa <strong>*4</strong><br /><br />• Globally 12% of all deaths among adults aged 30 years and over were attributed to tobacco as compared with 16% in India, 17% in Pakistan and 31% in Bangladesh <strong>*3</strong><br /><br />• A recent study illustrated the economic impact of Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs) in India by estimating that if NCDs like: heart disease, cancer, diabetes, chronic respiratory conditions, and other NCDs were “eliminated”, the country’s 2004 GDP would have been 4 to 10 percent greater<strong> *2</strong><br /><br />• The share of out-of-pocket household health expenditures on NCDs in India increased from 32 percent to 47 percent between 1995–1996 and 2004. Moreover, 40 percent of these expenditures were financed by borrowing and sales of assets, increasing the household’s financial vulnerability<strong> *2</strong><br /><br />• In NFHS-III, 62% of women with two daughters and no sons say they want no more children, compared with 47% in NFHS-II<strong> *1</strong></div><div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>15.</strong> 2019 India TB report, released in 2019, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, please <a href="https://tbcindia.gov.in/WriteReadData/India%20TB%20Report%202019.pdf" title="https://tbcindia.gov.in/WriteReadData/India%20TB%20Report%202019.pdf">click here</a> and <a href="https://tbcindia.gov.in/index1.php?lang=1&level=1&sublinkid=4160&lid=2807" title="https://tbcindia.gov.in/index1.php?lang=1&level=1&sublinkid=4160&lid=2807">click here</a> to access</div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>14.</strong> Trends in Maternal Mortality 2000 to 2017: Estimates by World Health Orgnization (WHO), United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF), World Bank Group, United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) and the United Nations Population Division (released in September 2019), please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Maternal%20mortality%20Levels%20and%20trends%202000%20to%202017%20Executive%20Summary.pdf" title="Maternal mortality Levels and trends 2000 to 2017 Executive Summary" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Maternal%20mortality%20Levels%20and%20trends%202000%20to%202017%20Executive%20Summary.pdf" title="Maternal mortality Levels and trends 2000 to 2017 Executive Summary">click here</a> and <a href="https://www.unfpa.org/featured-publication/trends-maternal-mortality-2000-2017" title="https://www.unfpa.org/featured-publication/trends-maternal-mortality-2000-2017">click here</a> to access</div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>13</strong>. National Health Profile 2018, 13th Issue, Central Bureau of Health Intelligence, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, please <a href="https://im4change.org/docs/900National%20Health%20Profile%202018%2013th%20Issue%20Central%20Bureau%20of%20Health%20Intelligence%20Ministry%20of%20Health%20&%20Family%20Welfare.pdf" title="https://im4change.org/docs/900National%20Health%20Profile%202018%2013th%20Issue%20Central%20Bureau%20of%20Health%20Intelligence%20Ministry%20of%20Health%20&%20Family%20Welfare.pdf">click here</a> to access </div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>12. </strong>India: Health of the Nation’s States - The India State-Level Disease Burden Initiative, Disease Burden Trends in the States of India 1990 to 2016 (released in October, 2017), prepared by Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), Public Health Foundation of India (PHFI), Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) and Ministry of Health & Family Welfare (MoHFW), please <a href="https://im4change.org/docs/11592India_Health_of.pdf" title="https://im4change.org/docs/11592India_Health_of.pdf">click here</a> to access</div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>11</strong>. National Health Accounts: Estimates for India 2014-15 (released in October, 2017), prepared by the National Health Accounts Technical Secretariat, National Health Systems Resource Centre and Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/National%20Health%20Accounts%20Estimates%20Report%202014-15.pdf" title="National Health Accounts Estimates for India 2014-15" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/National%20Health%20Accounts%20Estimates%20Report%202014-15.pdf" title="National Health Accounts Estimates for India 2014-15">click here</a> to access</div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>10</strong>. National Health Profile 2015, Central Bureau of Health Intelligence, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (please <a href="http://www.cbhidghs.nic.in/E-Book%20HTML-2015/index.html" title="http://www.cbhidghs.nic.in/E-Book%20HTML-2015/index.html">click here</a> to access)</div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>9</strong>. 71st round NSS report: Key Indicators of Social Consumption in India-Health (published in June 2015), please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/nss_71st_ki_health_30june15.pdf" title="NSS 71st Round Health" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/nss_71st_ki_health_30june15.pdf" title="NSS 71st Round Health">click here</a> to access the full report; please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/NSS%20Press%20Release%20Health.pdf" title="NSS Press Note Health" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/NSS%20Press%20Release%20Health.pdf" title="NSS Press Note Health">click here</a> to read the summary of findings</div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><div style="text-align:justify"><strong>8</strong>. Draft National Health Policy 2015 (published in December 2014), Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (Please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Draft%20National%20Health%20Policy%202015.pdf" title="Draft NHP 2015" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Draft%20National%20Health%20Policy%202015.pdf" title="Draft NHP 2015">click here</a> to download)</div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>7</strong>. United Nations' report (released in May, 2014) entitled Trends in maternal mortality estimates 1990 to 2013, </span>(please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Trends%20in%20Maternal%20Mortality%201990%20to%202013.pdf" title="Trends in Maternal Mortality 1990 to 2013" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Trends%20in%20Maternal%20Mortality%201990%20to%202013.pdf" title="Trends in Maternal Mortality 1990 to 2013">click here</a> to download)</div><div style="text-align:justify"> </div><p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-size:medium"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><strong>6. </strong><a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/APR_Progress_Report_2013_9_Sept_2013_1.pdf" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/APR_Progress_Report_2013_9_Sept_2013_1.pdf">Committing to Child Survival</a>: A Promise Renewed Progress Report 2013, UNICEF </span></span></p></div><p style="text-align:justify"> </p><p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>5</strong>. Pneumonia Progress Report, 2012, released by IVAC and John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012.pdf" title="Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012.pdf" title="Pneumonia-Progress-Report-2012">click here</a> to access</span></p><p style="text-align:justify"> </p><div style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>4</strong>. Defeating malaria in Asia, the Pacific, Americas, Middle East and Europe (2012), World Health Organization and PATH, </span></div><p style="text-align:justify"><a href="http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Defeating%20malaria.pdf" title="http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Defeating%20malaria.pdf">http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Defeat<br />ing%20malaria.pdf</a></p><p style="text-align:justify"> </p><p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>3</strong>. WHO Global Report: Mortality Attributable to Tobacco (2012), please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/WHO%20report%20on%20Tobacco.pdf" title="WHO " title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/WHO%20report%20on%20Tobacco.pdf" title="WHO ">click here</a> to access </span></p><p style="text-align:justify"> </p><p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>2</strong>. The Growing Danger of Non-Communicable Diseases: Acting Now to Reverse Course, September, 2011, The World Bank, please <a href="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/WBDeepeningCrisis.pdf" title="WBDeepeningCrisis" title="https://im4change.in/siteadmin/tinymce/uploaded/WBDeepeningCrisis.pdf" title="WBDeepeningCrisis">click here</a> to access</span></p><p style="text-align:justify"> </p><p style="text-align:justify"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:medium"><strong>1</strong>. National Family Health Survey III (2005-06), please <a href="http://rchiips.org/NFHS/nfhs3.shtml" title="http://rchiips.org/NFHS/nfhs3.shtml">click here</a> to access </span></p><p style="text-align:justify"> </p><p style="text-align:justify">' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Public Health |
KEY TRENDS
• The 2019 India TB report says that the country accounted for a quarter of the global tuberculosis (TB) burden with an estimated 27 lakh cases in 2018. In 2018, the country was able to achieve a total notification of 21.5 lakh TB cases, of which 25 percent was from private sector. Majority of the TB burden is among the working age group. Nearly 89 percent of TB cases came from the age group 15-69 years. About 2/3rd of the TB patients were males *15 • Maternal Mortality Ratio for India was 370 in 2000, 286 in 2005, 210 in 2010, 158 in 2015 and 145 in 2017. Therefore, the MMRatio for the country reduced by almost 61 percent between 2000 and 2017. MMRatio for China was 59 in 2000, 44 in 2005, 36 in 2010, 30 in 2015 and 29 in 2017. Therefore, the MMRatio for China fell by around 51 percent between 2000 and 2017 *14 • The per capita public expenditure (actual) on health in nominal terms has gone up from Rs. 621 in 2009-10 to Rs. 1,112 in 2015-16. Public expenditure on health (includes health sector expenditure by Centre and States/UTs) as a percentage of GDP was 1.02 percent in 2015-16. There is no significant change in public expenditure on health as a percentage of GDP since 2009-10. The Centre-State share in total public expenditure on health was 31:69 in 2015-16, which used to be 36:64 in 2009-10 *13 • The North-Eastern states had the highest (viz. Rs. 2,878 per capita) and Empowered Action Group (EAG) states (including Assam) had the lowest (viz. Rs. 871 per capita) average per capita public expenditure on health in 2015-16 (excluding UTs). The North-Eastern states had the highest public health expenditure as a percentage of Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP) in 2015-16 (2.76 percent). Public health expenditure as a percentage of GSDP stood at 1.36 percent for EAG states (including Assam) and 0.76 percent for major non-EAG states *13 • Of the total disease burden in India in 1990, a tenth was caused by a group of risks including unhealthy diet, high blood pressure, high blood sugar, high cholesterol, and overweight, which mainly contribute to ischaemic heart disease, stroke, and diabetes. The contribution of this group of risks increased massively to a quarter of the total disease burden in India in 2016 *12 • The Out-of-Pocket Expenditure (OOPE) on health by households is Rs. 3,02,425 crores (62.6 percent of total health expenditure, 2.4 percent of GDP, Rs. 2,394 per capita) for the year 2014-15. Private Health Insurance expenditure is Rs. 17,755 crores (3.7 percent of total health expenditure) for the year 2014-15 *11 • Based on available evidence, cardiovascular disease (24 percent), chronic respiratory disease (11 percent), cancer (6 percent) and diabetes (2 percent) are the leading cause of mortality in India *10 • The total number of dengue cases in India has grown from 28,292 in 2010 to 40,425 in 2014. The total number of dengue related deaths stood at 131 in 2014 *10 • The Proportion (per 1000) of Ailing Persons (PAP), measured as the number of living persons reporting ailments (per 1000 persons), was 89 persons in rural India and 118 persons in urban India *9 • Private doctors were the most important single source of non-hospitalized treatment in both the sectors (Rural & Urban). More than 70% (72 per cent in the rural areas and 79 per cent in the urban areas) spells of ailment were treated in the private sector (consisting of private doctors, nursing homes, private hospitals, charitable institutions, etc.) *9 • It is observed that in rural India, 42 percent hospitalised treatment was carried out in public hospital and rest 58 percent in private hospital. For the urban India, the corresponding figures were 32 percent and 68 percent. It may be noted in this context that households (or persons within households) were segregated in sector (rural/urban) by their place of domicile, and not by the place of treatment *9
• Average medical expenditure per hospitalisation case: Higher amount was spent for treatment per hospitalised case by people in the private hospitals (Rs. 25850) than in the public hospitals (Rs. 6120). The highest expenditure was recorded for treatment of Cancer (Rs. 56712) followed by that for Cardio-vascular diseases (Rs. 31647). Average medical expenditure per non-hospitalisation case was Rs. 509 in rural India and Rs. 639 in urban India *9 • As much as 86 percent of rural population and 82 percent of urban population were still not covered under any scheme of health expenditure support. Government, however, was able to bring about 12 percent urban and 13 percent rural population under health protection coverage through Rastriya Swasthya Bima Yojana (RSBY) or similar plan. Only 12 percent households of the 5th quintile class (Usual Monthly Per Capita Consumer Expenditure) of urban area had some arrangement of medical insurance from private provider *9 • The draft National Health Policy 2015 proposes a potentially achievable target of raising public health expenditure to 2.5% of the GDP. It also notes that 40% of this would need to come from Central expenditures. At current prices, a target of 2.5% of GDP translates to Rs. 3800 per capita, representing an almost four fold increase in five years *8 • Maternal mortality ratio (MMR)* in India stood at 560 maternal deaths (per 100000 live births) during 1990, 460 during 1995, 370 during 2000, 280 during 2005 and 190 during 2013. India could reduce MMR by 65 percent between 1990 and 2013 *7 • At the country level, the two countries that accounted for one third of all global maternal deaths are India at 17 percent (50000) and Nigeria at 14 percent (40000) *7 • U5MR in India declined by 55 percent from 126 in 1990 to 56 in 2012. Infant Mortality Rate declined from 88 in 1990 to 44 in 2012. Neonatal mortality rate declined from 51 in 1990 to 31 in 2012. U5MR in India among boys declined from 121 in 1990 to 54 in 2012. U5MR in India among girls declined from 130 in 1990 to 59 in 2012. The share of neonatal deaths in under-five deaths stood at 55 percent in 2012 as compared to 41 percent in 1990 *6 • Pneumonia is the leading cause of child mortality in India, responsible for the deaths of nearly 400,000 children under five in 2010 *5 • The Indian Commission on Macroeconomics and Health notes that, in India, 13 household person-days per patient were lost per episode of malaria. Furthermore, the commission estimated that the overall monetary losses to families (income losses together with treatment expenses) could amount to between 200 and 400 Indian rupees (US$ 3.5 to 7) *4 • Odisha is one of the most highly malaria-endemic states in India, accounting for 24% of reported cases in 2010 despite consisting of less of than 4% of the national population. Malaria is particularly common among tribal groups which represent 44% of the population of Orissa *4 • Globally 12% of all deaths among adults aged 30 years and over were attributed to tobacco as compared with 16% in India, 17% in Pakistan and 31% in Bangladesh *3 • A recent study illustrated the economic impact of Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs) in India by estimating that if NCDs like: heart disease, cancer, diabetes, chronic respiratory conditions, and other NCDs were “eliminated”, the country’s 2004 GDP would have been 4 to 10 percent greater *2 • The share of out-of-pocket household health expenditures on NCDs in India increased from 32 percent to 47 percent between 1995–1996 and 2004. Moreover, 40 percent of these expenditures were financed by borrowing and sales of assets, increasing the household’s financial vulnerability *2 • In NFHS-III, 62% of women with two daughters and no sons say they want no more children, compared with 47% in NFHS-II *1 15. 2019 India TB report, released in 2019, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, please click here and click here to access 14. Trends in Maternal Mortality 2000 to 2017: Estimates by World Health Orgnization (WHO), United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF), World Bank Group, United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) and the United Nations Population Division (released in September 2019), please click here and click here to access 13. National Health Profile 2018, 13th Issue, Central Bureau of Health Intelligence, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, please click here to access 12. India: Health of the Nation’s States - The India State-Level Disease Burden Initiative, Disease Burden Trends in the States of India 1990 to 2016 (released in October, 2017), prepared by Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), Public Health Foundation of India (PHFI), Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) and Ministry of Health & Family Welfare (MoHFW), please click here to access 11. National Health Accounts: Estimates for India 2014-15 (released in October, 2017), prepared by the National Health Accounts Technical Secretariat, National Health Systems Resource Centre and Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, please click here to access 10. National Health Profile 2015, Central Bureau of Health Intelligence, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (please click here to access) 9. 71st round NSS report: Key Indicators of Social Consumption in India-Health (published in June 2015), please click here to access the full report; please click here to read the summary of findings 8. Draft National Health Policy 2015 (published in December 2014), Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (Please click here to download) 7. United Nations' report (released in May, 2014) entitled Trends in maternal mortality estimates 1990 to 2013, (please click here to download) 6. Committing to Child Survival: A Promise Renewed Progress Report 2013, UNICEF
5. Pneumonia Progress Report, 2012, released by IVAC and John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, please click here to access
4. Defeating malaria in Asia, the Pacific, Americas, Middle East and Europe (2012), World Health Organization and PATH, http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/Defeat
3. WHO Global Report: Mortality Attributable to Tobacco (2012), please click here to access
2. The Growing Danger of Non-Communicable Diseases: Acting Now to Reverse Course, September, 2011, The World Bank, please click here to access
1. National Family Health Survey III (2005-06), please click here to access
|