Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/2009-10-turns-out-not-all-that-bad-for-farm-sector-by-harish-damodaran-2042/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/2009-10-turns-out-not-all-that-bad-for-farm-sector-by-harish-damodaran-2042/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/2009-10-turns-out-not-all-that-bad-for-farm-sector-by-harish-damodaran-2042/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/2009-10-turns-out-not-all-that-bad-for-farm-sector-by-harish-damodaran-2042/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67eec18f3db2f-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67eec18f3db2f-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67eec18f3db2f-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67eec18f3db2f-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67eec18f3db2f-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67eec18f3db2f-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67eec18f3db2f-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67eec18f3db2f-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67eec18f3db2f-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 1962,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;2009-10 turns out not all that bad for farm sector by Harish Damodaran&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Drought impacted agricultural production but not farm incomes.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The year 2009-10 was supposedly a bad year for Indian agriculture, given the worst ever monsoon since 1972.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;This is partly reflected in the 0.2 per cent growth registered by the farm sector (inclusive of forestry and fishing) in real terms, as per the Central Statistical Organisation&#039;s latest revised estimates of gross domestic product (GDP) for last fiscal.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The virtual stagnation in agricultural output contrasted with a 10.8 per cent increase in manufacturing, i.e. production from factories.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;However, real output growth (or lack of it) is not what ultimately counts, at least for the producer. For him, it is the increase in the value of produce &amp;mdash; which is a function of output as well as price &amp;mdash; that matters. This value, measured in current prices, is the income that accrues to him.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The value of agricultural output in current prices rose by 11.8 per cent during 2010-11, crossing the Rs 10 lakh crore mark for the first time. This was not substantially below the corresponding 14.4 per cent growth in manufacturing output value.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Simply put, last year&#039;s drought impacted agricultural production, but not farm incomes.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The loss (or near-zero growth) of output was more than offset by higher prices, as captured by the large gap between the &amp;lsquo;nominal&#039; (11.8 per cent) and &amp;lsquo;real&#039; (0.2 per cent) increase in agricultural GDP. So, while food inflation definitely hurt India, it may have been a blessing in disguise.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;On the other hand, the 14.4 per cent growth in manufacturing income was predominantly contributed by increased output (up 10.8 per cent), with corporates not having as much leeway to raise prices.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;It is only the last couple of months that have witnessed India Inc regain some pricing power &amp;mdash; rising non-food manufacturing inflation and higher capacity utilisation levels reported by firms being proof of this.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The effect that favourable terms of trade had for agriculture during 2009-10 can be seen in the accompanying table, which compares farm GDP with manufacturing GDP in both real as well as current value terms.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;While in constant 2004-05 prices, the value of agricultural output (Rs 6,51,901 crore) stood below that of manufacturing (Rs 7,19,975 crore), it was just the other way (Rs 10,04,594 crore versus Rs 9,31,101 crore) measured in absolute current value.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;And this pattern was observed in all but one quarter.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Business Line, 1 June, 2010, http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/2010/06/01/stories/2010060152530400.htm&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;2009-10-turns-out-not-all-that-bad-for-farm-sector-by-harish-damodaran-2042&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 2042,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 1962,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 2009-10 turns out not all that bad for farm sector by Harish Damodaran&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Agriculture&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;




Drought impacted agricultural production but not farm incomes.&amp;nbsp; 


The year 2009-10 was supposedly a bad year for Indian agriculture, given the worst ever monsoon since 1972.


This is partly reflected in the 0.2 per cent growth registered by the farm sector...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;&lt;em&gt;Drought impacted agricultural production but not farm incomes.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;The year 2009-10 was supposedly a bad year for Indian agriculture, given the worst ever monsoon since 1972.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;This is partly reflected in the 0.2 per cent growth registered by the farm sector (inclusive of forestry and fishing) in real terms, as per the Central Statistical Organisation&#039;s latest revised estimates of gross domestic product (GDP) for last fiscal.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;The virtual stagnation in agricultural output contrasted with a 10.8 per cent increase in manufacturing, i.e. production from factories.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;However, real output growth (or lack of it) is not what ultimately counts, at least for the producer. For him, it is the increase in the value of produce &amp;mdash; which is a function of output as well as price &amp;mdash; that matters. This value, measured in current prices, is the income that accrues to him.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;The value of agricultural output in current prices rose by 11.8 per cent during 2010-11, crossing the Rs 10 lakh crore mark for the first time. This was not substantially below the corresponding 14.4 per cent growth in manufacturing output value.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;Simply put, last year&#039;s drought impacted agricultural production, but not farm incomes.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;The loss (or near-zero growth) of output was more than offset by higher prices, as captured by the large gap between the &amp;lsquo;nominal&#039; (11.8 per cent) and &amp;lsquo;real&#039; (0.2 per cent) increase in agricultural GDP. So, while food inflation definitely hurt India, it may have been a blessing in disguise.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;On the other hand, the 14.4 per cent growth in manufacturing income was predominantly contributed by increased output (up 10.8 per cent), with corporates not having as much leeway to raise prices.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;It is only the last couple of months that have witnessed India Inc regain some pricing power &amp;mdash; rising non-food manufacturing inflation and higher capacity utilisation levels reported by firms being proof of this.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;The effect that favourable terms of trade had for agriculture during 2009-10 can be seen in the accompanying table, which compares farm GDP with manufacturing GDP in both real as well as current value terms.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;While in constant 2004-05 prices, the value of agricultural output (Rs 6,51,901 crore) stood below that of manufacturing (Rs 7,19,975 crore), it was just the other way (Rs 10,04,594 crore versus Rs 9,31,101 crore) measured in absolute current value.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;And this pattern was observed in all but one quarter.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 1962,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;2009-10 turns out not all that bad for farm sector by Harish Damodaran&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Drought impacted agricultural production but not farm incomes.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The year 2009-10 was supposedly a bad year for Indian agriculture, given the worst ever monsoon since 1972.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;This is partly reflected in the 0.2 per cent growth registered by the farm sector (inclusive of forestry and fishing) in real terms, as per the Central Statistical Organisation&#039;s latest revised estimates of gross domestic product (GDP) for last fiscal.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The virtual stagnation in agricultural output contrasted with a 10.8 per cent increase in manufacturing, i.e. production from factories.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;However, real output growth (or lack of it) is not what ultimately counts, at least for the producer. For him, it is the increase in the value of produce &amp;mdash; which is a function of output as well as price &amp;mdash; that matters. This value, measured in current prices, is the income that accrues to him.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The value of agricultural output in current prices rose by 11.8 per cent during 2010-11, crossing the Rs 10 lakh crore mark for the first time. This was not substantially below the corresponding 14.4 per cent growth in manufacturing output value.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Simply put, last year&#039;s drought impacted agricultural production, but not farm incomes.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The loss (or near-zero growth) of output was more than offset by higher prices, as captured by the large gap between the &amp;lsquo;nominal&#039; (11.8 per cent) and &amp;lsquo;real&#039; (0.2 per cent) increase in agricultural GDP. So, while food inflation definitely hurt India, it may have been a blessing in disguise.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;On the other hand, the 14.4 per cent growth in manufacturing income was predominantly contributed by increased output (up 10.8 per cent), with corporates not having as much leeway to raise prices.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;It is only the last couple of months that have witnessed India Inc regain some pricing power &amp;mdash; rising non-food manufacturing inflation and higher capacity utilisation levels reported by firms being proof of this.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The effect that favourable terms of trade had for agriculture during 2009-10 can be seen in the accompanying table, which compares farm GDP with manufacturing GDP in both real as well as current value terms.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;While in constant 2004-05 prices, the value of agricultural output (Rs 6,51,901 crore) stood below that of manufacturing (Rs 7,19,975 crore), it was just the other way (Rs 10,04,594 crore versus Rs 9,31,101 crore) measured in absolute current value.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;And this pattern was observed in all but one quarter.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Business Line, 1 June, 2010, http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/2010/06/01/stories/2010060152530400.htm&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;2009-10-turns-out-not-all-that-bad-for-farm-sector-by-harish-damodaran-2042&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 2042,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 1962
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 2009-10 turns out not all that bad for farm sector by Harish Damodaran&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Agriculture&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;




Drought impacted agricultural production but not farm incomes.&amp;nbsp; 


The year 2009-10 was supposedly a bad year for Indian agriculture, given the worst ever monsoon since 1972.


This is partly reflected in the 0.2 per cent growth registered by the farm sector...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;&lt;em&gt;Drought impacted agricultural production but not farm incomes.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;The year 2009-10 was supposedly a bad year for Indian agriculture, given the worst ever monsoon since 1972.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;This is partly reflected in the 0.2 per cent growth registered by the farm sector (inclusive of forestry and fishing) in real terms, as per the Central Statistical Organisation&#039;s latest revised estimates of gross domestic product (GDP) for last fiscal.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;The virtual stagnation in agricultural output contrasted with a 10.8 per cent increase in manufacturing, i.e. production from factories.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;However, real output growth (or lack of it) is not what ultimately counts, at least for the producer. For him, it is the increase in the value of produce &amp;mdash; which is a function of output as well as price &amp;mdash; that matters. This value, measured in current prices, is the income that accrues to him.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;The value of agricultural output in current prices rose by 11.8 per cent during 2010-11, crossing the Rs 10 lakh crore mark for the first time. This was not substantially below the corresponding 14.4 per cent growth in manufacturing output value.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;Simply put, last year&#039;s drought impacted agricultural production, but not farm incomes.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;The loss (or near-zero growth) of output was more than offset by higher prices, as captured by the large gap between the &amp;lsquo;nominal&#039; (11.8 per cent) and &amp;lsquo;real&#039; (0.2 per cent) increase in agricultural GDP. So, while food inflation definitely hurt India, it may have been a blessing in disguise.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;On the other hand, the 14.4 per cent growth in manufacturing income was predominantly contributed by increased output (up 10.8 per cent), with corporates not having as much leeway to raise prices.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;It is only the last couple of months that have witnessed India Inc regain some pricing power &amp;mdash; rising non-food manufacturing inflation and higher capacity utilisation levels reported by firms being proof of this.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;The effect that favourable terms of trade had for agriculture during 2009-10 can be seen in the accompanying table, which compares farm GDP with manufacturing GDP in both real as well as current value terms.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;While in constant 2004-05 prices, the value of agricultural output (Rs 6,51,901 crore) stood below that of manufacturing (Rs 7,19,975 crore), it was just the other way (Rs 10,04,594 crore versus Rs 9,31,101 crore) measured in absolute current value.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;And this pattern was observed in all but one quarter.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/2009-10-turns-out-not-all-that-bad-for-farm-sector-by-harish-damodaran-2042.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 2009-10 turns out not all that bad for farm sector by Harish Damodaran | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="




Drought impacted agricultural production but not farm incomes.&nbsp; 


The year 2009-10 was supposedly a bad year for Indian agriculture, given the worst ever monsoon since 1972.


This is partly reflected in the 0.2 per cent growth registered by the farm sector..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>2009-10 turns out not all that bad for farm sector by Harish Damodaran</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font ><em>Drought impacted agricultural production but not farm incomes.&nbsp; </em></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The year 2009-10 was supposedly a bad year for Indian agriculture, given the worst ever monsoon since 1972.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >This is partly reflected in the 0.2 per cent growth registered by the farm sector (inclusive of forestry and fishing) in real terms, as per the Central Statistical Organisation's latest revised estimates of gross domestic product (GDP) for last fiscal.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The virtual stagnation in agricultural output contrasted with a 10.8 per cent increase in manufacturing, i.e. production from factories.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >However, real output growth (or lack of it) is not what ultimately counts, at least for the producer. For him, it is the increase in the value of produce &mdash; which is a function of output as well as price &mdash; that matters. This value, measured in current prices, is the income that accrues to him.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The value of agricultural output in current prices rose by 11.8 per cent during 2010-11, crossing the Rs 10 lakh crore mark for the first time. This was not substantially below the corresponding 14.4 per cent growth in manufacturing output value.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Simply put, last year's drought impacted agricultural production, but not farm incomes.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The loss (or near-zero growth) of output was more than offset by higher prices, as captured by the large gap between the &lsquo;nominal' (11.8 per cent) and &lsquo;real' (0.2 per cent) increase in agricultural GDP. So, while food inflation definitely hurt India, it may have been a blessing in disguise.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >On the other hand, the 14.4 per cent growth in manufacturing income was predominantly contributed by increased output (up 10.8 per cent), with corporates not having as much leeway to raise prices.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >It is only the last couple of months that have witnessed India Inc regain some pricing power &mdash; rising non-food manufacturing inflation and higher capacity utilisation levels reported by firms being proof of this.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The effect that favourable terms of trade had for agriculture during 2009-10 can be seen in the accompanying table, which compares farm GDP with manufacturing GDP in both real as well as current value terms.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >While in constant 2004-05 prices, the value of agricultural output (Rs 6,51,901 crore) stood below that of manufacturing (Rs 7,19,975 crore), it was just the other way (Rs 10,04,594 crore versus Rs 9,31,101 crore) measured in absolute current value.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >And this pattern was observed in all but one quarter.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67eec18f3db2f-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67eec18f3db2f-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67eec18f3db2f-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67eec18f3db2f-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67eec18f3db2f-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67eec18f3db2f-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67eec18f3db2f-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67eec18f3db2f-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67eec18f3db2f-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 1962,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;2009-10 turns out not all that bad for farm sector by Harish Damodaran&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Drought impacted agricultural production but not farm incomes.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The year 2009-10 was supposedly a bad year for Indian agriculture, given the worst ever monsoon since 1972.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;This is partly reflected in the 0.2 per cent growth registered by the farm sector (inclusive of forestry and fishing) in real terms, as per the Central Statistical Organisation&#039;s latest revised estimates of gross domestic product (GDP) for last fiscal.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The virtual stagnation in agricultural output contrasted with a 10.8 per cent increase in manufacturing, i.e. production from factories.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;However, real output growth (or lack of it) is not what ultimately counts, at least for the producer. For him, it is the increase in the value of produce &amp;mdash; which is a function of output as well as price &amp;mdash; that matters. This value, measured in current prices, is the income that accrues to him.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The value of agricultural output in current prices rose by 11.8 per cent during 2010-11, crossing the Rs 10 lakh crore mark for the first time. This was not substantially below the corresponding 14.4 per cent growth in manufacturing output value.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Simply put, last year&#039;s drought impacted agricultural production, but not farm incomes.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The loss (or near-zero growth) of output was more than offset by higher prices, as captured by the large gap between the &amp;lsquo;nominal&#039; (11.8 per cent) and &amp;lsquo;real&#039; (0.2 per cent) increase in agricultural GDP. So, while food inflation definitely hurt India, it may have been a blessing in disguise.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;On the other hand, the 14.4 per cent growth in manufacturing income was predominantly contributed by increased output (up 10.8 per cent), with corporates not having as much leeway to raise prices.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;It is only the last couple of months that have witnessed India Inc regain some pricing power &amp;mdash; rising non-food manufacturing inflation and higher capacity utilisation levels reported by firms being proof of this.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The effect that favourable terms of trade had for agriculture during 2009-10 can be seen in the accompanying table, which compares farm GDP with manufacturing GDP in both real as well as current value terms.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;While in constant 2004-05 prices, the value of agricultural output (Rs 6,51,901 crore) stood below that of manufacturing (Rs 7,19,975 crore), it was just the other way (Rs 10,04,594 crore versus Rs 9,31,101 crore) measured in absolute current value.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;And this pattern was observed in all but one quarter.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Business Line, 1 June, 2010, http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/2010/06/01/stories/2010060152530400.htm&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;2009-10-turns-out-not-all-that-bad-for-farm-sector-by-harish-damodaran-2042&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 2042,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 1962,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 2009-10 turns out not all that bad for farm sector by Harish Damodaran&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Agriculture&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;




Drought impacted agricultural production but not farm incomes.&amp;nbsp; 


The year 2009-10 was supposedly a bad year for Indian agriculture, given the worst ever monsoon since 1972.


This is partly reflected in the 0.2 per cent growth registered by the farm sector...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;&lt;em&gt;Drought impacted agricultural production but not farm incomes.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;The year 2009-10 was supposedly a bad year for Indian agriculture, given the worst ever monsoon since 1972.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;This is partly reflected in the 0.2 per cent growth registered by the farm sector (inclusive of forestry and fishing) in real terms, as per the Central Statistical Organisation&#039;s latest revised estimates of gross domestic product (GDP) for last fiscal.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;The virtual stagnation in agricultural output contrasted with a 10.8 per cent increase in manufacturing, i.e. production from factories.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;However, real output growth (or lack of it) is not what ultimately counts, at least for the producer. For him, it is the increase in the value of produce &amp;mdash; which is a function of output as well as price &amp;mdash; that matters. This value, measured in current prices, is the income that accrues to him.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;The value of agricultural output in current prices rose by 11.8 per cent during 2010-11, crossing the Rs 10 lakh crore mark for the first time. This was not substantially below the corresponding 14.4 per cent growth in manufacturing output value.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;Simply put, last year&#039;s drought impacted agricultural production, but not farm incomes.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;The loss (or near-zero growth) of output was more than offset by higher prices, as captured by the large gap between the &amp;lsquo;nominal&#039; (11.8 per cent) and &amp;lsquo;real&#039; (0.2 per cent) increase in agricultural GDP. So, while food inflation definitely hurt India, it may have been a blessing in disguise.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;On the other hand, the 14.4 per cent growth in manufacturing income was predominantly contributed by increased output (up 10.8 per cent), with corporates not having as much leeway to raise prices.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;It is only the last couple of months that have witnessed India Inc regain some pricing power &amp;mdash; rising non-food manufacturing inflation and higher capacity utilisation levels reported by firms being proof of this.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;The effect that favourable terms of trade had for agriculture during 2009-10 can be seen in the accompanying table, which compares farm GDP with manufacturing GDP in both real as well as current value terms.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;While in constant 2004-05 prices, the value of agricultural output (Rs 6,51,901 crore) stood below that of manufacturing (Rs 7,19,975 crore), it was just the other way (Rs 10,04,594 crore versus Rs 9,31,101 crore) measured in absolute current value.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;And this pattern was observed in all but one quarter.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 1962,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;2009-10 turns out not all that bad for farm sector by Harish Damodaran&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Drought impacted agricultural production but not farm incomes.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The year 2009-10 was supposedly a bad year for Indian agriculture, given the worst ever monsoon since 1972.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;This is partly reflected in the 0.2 per cent growth registered by the farm sector (inclusive of forestry and fishing) in real terms, as per the Central Statistical Organisation&#039;s latest revised estimates of gross domestic product (GDP) for last fiscal.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The virtual stagnation in agricultural output contrasted with a 10.8 per cent increase in manufacturing, i.e. production from factories.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;However, real output growth (or lack of it) is not what ultimately counts, at least for the producer. For him, it is the increase in the value of produce &amp;mdash; which is a function of output as well as price &amp;mdash; that matters. This value, measured in current prices, is the income that accrues to him.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The value of agricultural output in current prices rose by 11.8 per cent during 2010-11, crossing the Rs 10 lakh crore mark for the first time. This was not substantially below the corresponding 14.4 per cent growth in manufacturing output value.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Simply put, last year&#039;s drought impacted agricultural production, but not farm incomes.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The loss (or near-zero growth) of output was more than offset by higher prices, as captured by the large gap between the &amp;lsquo;nominal&#039; (11.8 per cent) and &amp;lsquo;real&#039; (0.2 per cent) increase in agricultural GDP. So, while food inflation definitely hurt India, it may have been a blessing in disguise.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;On the other hand, the 14.4 per cent growth in manufacturing income was predominantly contributed by increased output (up 10.8 per cent), with corporates not having as much leeway to raise prices.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;It is only the last couple of months that have witnessed India Inc regain some pricing power &amp;mdash; rising non-food manufacturing inflation and higher capacity utilisation levels reported by firms being proof of this.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The effect that favourable terms of trade had for agriculture during 2009-10 can be seen in the accompanying table, which compares farm GDP with manufacturing GDP in both real as well as current value terms.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;While in constant 2004-05 prices, the value of agricultural output (Rs 6,51,901 crore) stood below that of manufacturing (Rs 7,19,975 crore), it was just the other way (Rs 10,04,594 crore versus Rs 9,31,101 crore) measured in absolute current value.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;And this pattern was observed in all but one quarter.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Business Line, 1 June, 2010, http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/2010/06/01/stories/2010060152530400.htm&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;2009-10-turns-out-not-all-that-bad-for-farm-sector-by-harish-damodaran-2042&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 2042,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 1962
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 2009-10 turns out not all that bad for farm sector by Harish Damodaran&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Agriculture&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;




Drought impacted agricultural production but not farm incomes.&amp;nbsp; 


The year 2009-10 was supposedly a bad year for Indian agriculture, given the worst ever monsoon since 1972.


This is partly reflected in the 0.2 per cent growth registered by the farm sector...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;&lt;em&gt;Drought impacted agricultural production but not farm incomes.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;The year 2009-10 was supposedly a bad year for Indian agriculture, given the worst ever monsoon since 1972.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;This is partly reflected in the 0.2 per cent growth registered by the farm sector (inclusive of forestry and fishing) in real terms, as per the Central Statistical Organisation&#039;s latest revised estimates of gross domestic product (GDP) for last fiscal.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;The virtual stagnation in agricultural output contrasted with a 10.8 per cent increase in manufacturing, i.e. production from factories.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;However, real output growth (or lack of it) is not what ultimately counts, at least for the producer. For him, it is the increase in the value of produce &amp;mdash; which is a function of output as well as price &amp;mdash; that matters. This value, measured in current prices, is the income that accrues to him.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;The value of agricultural output in current prices rose by 11.8 per cent during 2010-11, crossing the Rs 10 lakh crore mark for the first time. This was not substantially below the corresponding 14.4 per cent growth in manufacturing output value.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;Simply put, last year&#039;s drought impacted agricultural production, but not farm incomes.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;The loss (or near-zero growth) of output was more than offset by higher prices, as captured by the large gap between the &amp;lsquo;nominal&#039; (11.8 per cent) and &amp;lsquo;real&#039; (0.2 per cent) increase in agricultural GDP. So, while food inflation definitely hurt India, it may have been a blessing in disguise.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;On the other hand, the 14.4 per cent growth in manufacturing income was predominantly contributed by increased output (up 10.8 per cent), with corporates not having as much leeway to raise prices.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;It is only the last couple of months that have witnessed India Inc regain some pricing power &amp;mdash; rising non-food manufacturing inflation and higher capacity utilisation levels reported by firms being proof of this.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;The effect that favourable terms of trade had for agriculture during 2009-10 can be seen in the accompanying table, which compares farm GDP with manufacturing GDP in both real as well as current value terms.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;While in constant 2004-05 prices, the value of agricultural output (Rs 6,51,901 crore) stood below that of manufacturing (Rs 7,19,975 crore), it was just the other way (Rs 10,04,594 crore versus Rs 9,31,101 crore) measured in absolute current value.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;And this pattern was observed in all but one quarter.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/2009-10-turns-out-not-all-that-bad-for-farm-sector-by-harish-damodaran-2042.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 2009-10 turns out not all that bad for farm sector by Harish Damodaran | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="




Drought impacted agricultural production but not farm incomes.&nbsp; 


The year 2009-10 was supposedly a bad year for Indian agriculture, given the worst ever monsoon since 1972.


This is partly reflected in the 0.2 per cent growth registered by the farm sector..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>2009-10 turns out not all that bad for farm sector by Harish Damodaran</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font ><em>Drought impacted agricultural production but not farm incomes.&nbsp; </em></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The year 2009-10 was supposedly a bad year for Indian agriculture, given the worst ever monsoon since 1972.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >This is partly reflected in the 0.2 per cent growth registered by the farm sector (inclusive of forestry and fishing) in real terms, as per the Central Statistical Organisation's latest revised estimates of gross domestic product (GDP) for last fiscal.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The virtual stagnation in agricultural output contrasted with a 10.8 per cent increase in manufacturing, i.e. production from factories.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >However, real output growth (or lack of it) is not what ultimately counts, at least for the producer. For him, it is the increase in the value of produce &mdash; which is a function of output as well as price &mdash; that matters. This value, measured in current prices, is the income that accrues to him.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The value of agricultural output in current prices rose by 11.8 per cent during 2010-11, crossing the Rs 10 lakh crore mark for the first time. This was not substantially below the corresponding 14.4 per cent growth in manufacturing output value.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Simply put, last year's drought impacted agricultural production, but not farm incomes.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The loss (or near-zero growth) of output was more than offset by higher prices, as captured by the large gap between the &lsquo;nominal' (11.8 per cent) and &lsquo;real' (0.2 per cent) increase in agricultural GDP. So, while food inflation definitely hurt India, it may have been a blessing in disguise.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >On the other hand, the 14.4 per cent growth in manufacturing income was predominantly contributed by increased output (up 10.8 per cent), with corporates not having as much leeway to raise prices.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >It is only the last couple of months that have witnessed India Inc regain some pricing power &mdash; rising non-food manufacturing inflation and higher capacity utilisation levels reported by firms being proof of this.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The effect that favourable terms of trade had for agriculture during 2009-10 can be seen in the accompanying table, which compares farm GDP with manufacturing GDP in both real as well as current value terms.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >While in constant 2004-05 prices, the value of agricultural output (Rs 6,51,901 crore) stood below that of manufacturing (Rs 7,19,975 crore), it was just the other way (Rs 10,04,594 crore versus Rs 9,31,101 crore) measured in absolute current value.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >And this pattern was observed in all but one quarter.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67eec18f3db2f-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67eec18f3db2f-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67eec18f3db2f-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67eec18f3db2f-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67eec18f3db2f-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67eec18f3db2f-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67eec18f3db2f-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67eec18f3db2f-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67eec18f3db2f-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 1962,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;2009-10 turns out not all that bad for farm sector by Harish Damodaran&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Drought impacted agricultural production but not farm incomes.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The year 2009-10 was supposedly a bad year for Indian agriculture, given the worst ever monsoon since 1972.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;This is partly reflected in the 0.2 per cent growth registered by the farm sector (inclusive of forestry and fishing) in real terms, as per the Central Statistical Organisation&#039;s latest revised estimates of gross domestic product (GDP) for last fiscal.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The virtual stagnation in agricultural output contrasted with a 10.8 per cent increase in manufacturing, i.e. production from factories.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;However, real output growth (or lack of it) is not what ultimately counts, at least for the producer. For him, it is the increase in the value of produce &amp;mdash; which is a function of output as well as price &amp;mdash; that matters. This value, measured in current prices, is the income that accrues to him.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The value of agricultural output in current prices rose by 11.8 per cent during 2010-11, crossing the Rs 10 lakh crore mark for the first time. This was not substantially below the corresponding 14.4 per cent growth in manufacturing output value.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Simply put, last year&#039;s drought impacted agricultural production, but not farm incomes.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The loss (or near-zero growth) of output was more than offset by higher prices, as captured by the large gap between the &amp;lsquo;nominal&#039; (11.8 per cent) and &amp;lsquo;real&#039; (0.2 per cent) increase in agricultural GDP. So, while food inflation definitely hurt India, it may have been a blessing in disguise.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;On the other hand, the 14.4 per cent growth in manufacturing income was predominantly contributed by increased output (up 10.8 per cent), with corporates not having as much leeway to raise prices.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;It is only the last couple of months that have witnessed India Inc regain some pricing power &amp;mdash; rising non-food manufacturing inflation and higher capacity utilisation levels reported by firms being proof of this.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The effect that favourable terms of trade had for agriculture during 2009-10 can be seen in the accompanying table, which compares farm GDP with manufacturing GDP in both real as well as current value terms.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;While in constant 2004-05 prices, the value of agricultural output (Rs 6,51,901 crore) stood below that of manufacturing (Rs 7,19,975 crore), it was just the other way (Rs 10,04,594 crore versus Rs 9,31,101 crore) measured in absolute current value.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;And this pattern was observed in all but one quarter.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Business Line, 1 June, 2010, http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/2010/06/01/stories/2010060152530400.htm&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;2009-10-turns-out-not-all-that-bad-for-farm-sector-by-harish-damodaran-2042&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 2042,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 1962,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 2009-10 turns out not all that bad for farm sector by Harish Damodaran&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Agriculture&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;




Drought impacted agricultural production but not farm incomes.&amp;nbsp; 


The year 2009-10 was supposedly a bad year for Indian agriculture, given the worst ever monsoon since 1972.


This is partly reflected in the 0.2 per cent growth registered by the farm sector...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;&lt;em&gt;Drought impacted agricultural production but not farm incomes.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;The year 2009-10 was supposedly a bad year for Indian agriculture, given the worst ever monsoon since 1972.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;This is partly reflected in the 0.2 per cent growth registered by the farm sector (inclusive of forestry and fishing) in real terms, as per the Central Statistical Organisation&#039;s latest revised estimates of gross domestic product (GDP) for last fiscal.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;The virtual stagnation in agricultural output contrasted with a 10.8 per cent increase in manufacturing, i.e. production from factories.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;However, real output growth (or lack of it) is not what ultimately counts, at least for the producer. For him, it is the increase in the value of produce &amp;mdash; which is a function of output as well as price &amp;mdash; that matters. This value, measured in current prices, is the income that accrues to him.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;The value of agricultural output in current prices rose by 11.8 per cent during 2010-11, crossing the Rs 10 lakh crore mark for the first time. This was not substantially below the corresponding 14.4 per cent growth in manufacturing output value.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;Simply put, last year&#039;s drought impacted agricultural production, but not farm incomes.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;The loss (or near-zero growth) of output was more than offset by higher prices, as captured by the large gap between the &amp;lsquo;nominal&#039; (11.8 per cent) and &amp;lsquo;real&#039; (0.2 per cent) increase in agricultural GDP. So, while food inflation definitely hurt India, it may have been a blessing in disguise.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;On the other hand, the 14.4 per cent growth in manufacturing income was predominantly contributed by increased output (up 10.8 per cent), with corporates not having as much leeway to raise prices.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;It is only the last couple of months that have witnessed India Inc regain some pricing power &amp;mdash; rising non-food manufacturing inflation and higher capacity utilisation levels reported by firms being proof of this.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;The effect that favourable terms of trade had for agriculture during 2009-10 can be seen in the accompanying table, which compares farm GDP with manufacturing GDP in both real as well as current value terms.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;While in constant 2004-05 prices, the value of agricultural output (Rs 6,51,901 crore) stood below that of manufacturing (Rs 7,19,975 crore), it was just the other way (Rs 10,04,594 crore versus Rs 9,31,101 crore) measured in absolute current value.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;And this pattern was observed in all but one quarter.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 1962,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;2009-10 turns out not all that bad for farm sector by Harish Damodaran&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Drought impacted agricultural production but not farm incomes.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The year 2009-10 was supposedly a bad year for Indian agriculture, given the worst ever monsoon since 1972.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;This is partly reflected in the 0.2 per cent growth registered by the farm sector (inclusive of forestry and fishing) in real terms, as per the Central Statistical Organisation&#039;s latest revised estimates of gross domestic product (GDP) for last fiscal.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The virtual stagnation in agricultural output contrasted with a 10.8 per cent increase in manufacturing, i.e. production from factories.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;However, real output growth (or lack of it) is not what ultimately counts, at least for the producer. For him, it is the increase in the value of produce &amp;mdash; which is a function of output as well as price &amp;mdash; that matters. This value, measured in current prices, is the income that accrues to him.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The value of agricultural output in current prices rose by 11.8 per cent during 2010-11, crossing the Rs 10 lakh crore mark for the first time. This was not substantially below the corresponding 14.4 per cent growth in manufacturing output value.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;Simply put, last year&#039;s drought impacted agricultural production, but not farm incomes.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The loss (or near-zero growth) of output was more than offset by higher prices, as captured by the large gap between the &amp;lsquo;nominal&#039; (11.8 per cent) and &amp;lsquo;real&#039; (0.2 per cent) increase in agricultural GDP. So, while food inflation definitely hurt India, it may have been a blessing in disguise.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;On the other hand, the 14.4 per cent growth in manufacturing income was predominantly contributed by increased output (up 10.8 per cent), with corporates not having as much leeway to raise prices.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;It is only the last couple of months that have witnessed India Inc regain some pricing power &amp;mdash; rising non-food manufacturing inflation and higher capacity utilisation levels reported by firms being proof of this.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;The effect that favourable terms of trade had for agriculture during 2009-10 can be seen in the accompanying table, which compares farm GDP with manufacturing GDP in both real as well as current value terms.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;While in constant 2004-05 prices, the value of agricultural output (Rs 6,51,901 crore) stood below that of manufacturing (Rs 7,19,975 crore), it was just the other way (Rs 10,04,594 crore versus Rs 9,31,101 crore) measured in absolute current value.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;And this pattern was observed in all but one quarter.&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;font face=&quot;arial,helvetica,sans-serif&quot; size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Business Line, 1 June, 2010, http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/2010/06/01/stories/2010060152530400.htm&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;2009-10-turns-out-not-all-that-bad-for-farm-sector-by-harish-damodaran-2042&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 2042,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 1962
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 2009-10 turns out not all that bad for farm sector by Harish Damodaran&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Agriculture&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;




Drought impacted agricultural production but not farm incomes.&amp;nbsp; 


The year 2009-10 was supposedly a bad year for Indian agriculture, given the worst ever monsoon since 1972.


This is partly reflected in the 0.2 per cent growth registered by the farm sector...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;font &gt;&lt;em&gt;Drought impacted agricultural production but not farm incomes.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;The year 2009-10 was supposedly a bad year for Indian agriculture, given the worst ever monsoon since 1972.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;This is partly reflected in the 0.2 per cent growth registered by the farm sector (inclusive of forestry and fishing) in real terms, as per the Central Statistical Organisation&#039;s latest revised estimates of gross domestic product (GDP) for last fiscal.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;The virtual stagnation in agricultural output contrasted with a 10.8 per cent increase in manufacturing, i.e. production from factories.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;However, real output growth (or lack of it) is not what ultimately counts, at least for the producer. For him, it is the increase in the value of produce &amp;mdash; which is a function of output as well as price &amp;mdash; that matters. This value, measured in current prices, is the income that accrues to him.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;The value of agricultural output in current prices rose by 11.8 per cent during 2010-11, crossing the Rs 10 lakh crore mark for the first time. This was not substantially below the corresponding 14.4 per cent growth in manufacturing output value.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;Simply put, last year&#039;s drought impacted agricultural production, but not farm incomes.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;The loss (or near-zero growth) of output was more than offset by higher prices, as captured by the large gap between the &amp;lsquo;nominal&#039; (11.8 per cent) and &amp;lsquo;real&#039; (0.2 per cent) increase in agricultural GDP. So, while food inflation definitely hurt India, it may have been a blessing in disguise.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;On the other hand, the 14.4 per cent growth in manufacturing income was predominantly contributed by increased output (up 10.8 per cent), with corporates not having as much leeway to raise prices.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;It is only the last couple of months that have witnessed India Inc regain some pricing power &amp;mdash; rising non-food manufacturing inflation and higher capacity utilisation levels reported by firms being proof of this.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;The effect that favourable terms of trade had for agriculture during 2009-10 can be seen in the accompanying table, which compares farm GDP with manufacturing GDP in both real as well as current value terms.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;While in constant 2004-05 prices, the value of agricultural output (Rs 6,51,901 crore) stood below that of manufacturing (Rs 7,19,975 crore), it was just the other way (Rs 10,04,594 crore versus Rs 9,31,101 crore) measured in absolute current value.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;And this pattern was observed in all but one quarter.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;font &gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/2009-10-turns-out-not-all-that-bad-for-farm-sector-by-harish-damodaran-2042.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 2009-10 turns out not all that bad for farm sector by Harish Damodaran | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="




Drought impacted agricultural production but not farm incomes.&nbsp; 


The year 2009-10 was supposedly a bad year for Indian agriculture, given the worst ever monsoon since 1972.


This is partly reflected in the 0.2 per cent growth registered by the farm sector..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>2009-10 turns out not all that bad for farm sector by Harish Damodaran</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font ><em>Drought impacted agricultural production but not farm incomes.&nbsp; </em></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The year 2009-10 was supposedly a bad year for Indian agriculture, given the worst ever monsoon since 1972.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >This is partly reflected in the 0.2 per cent growth registered by the farm sector (inclusive of forestry and fishing) in real terms, as per the Central Statistical Organisation's latest revised estimates of gross domestic product (GDP) for last fiscal.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The virtual stagnation in agricultural output contrasted with a 10.8 per cent increase in manufacturing, i.e. production from factories.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >However, real output growth (or lack of it) is not what ultimately counts, at least for the producer. For him, it is the increase in the value of produce &mdash; which is a function of output as well as price &mdash; that matters. This value, measured in current prices, is the income that accrues to him.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The value of agricultural output in current prices rose by 11.8 per cent during 2010-11, crossing the Rs 10 lakh crore mark for the first time. This was not substantially below the corresponding 14.4 per cent growth in manufacturing output value.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Simply put, last year's drought impacted agricultural production, but not farm incomes.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The loss (or near-zero growth) of output was more than offset by higher prices, as captured by the large gap between the &lsquo;nominal' (11.8 per cent) and &lsquo;real' (0.2 per cent) increase in agricultural GDP. So, while food inflation definitely hurt India, it may have been a blessing in disguise.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >On the other hand, the 14.4 per cent growth in manufacturing income was predominantly contributed by increased output (up 10.8 per cent), with corporates not having as much leeway to raise prices.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >It is only the last couple of months that have witnessed India Inc regain some pricing power &mdash; rising non-food manufacturing inflation and higher capacity utilisation levels reported by firms being proof of this.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The effect that favourable terms of trade had for agriculture during 2009-10 can be seen in the accompanying table, which compares farm GDP with manufacturing GDP in both real as well as current value terms.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >While in constant 2004-05 prices, the value of agricultural output (Rs 6,51,901 crore) stood below that of manufacturing (Rs 7,19,975 crore), it was just the other way (Rs 10,04,594 crore versus Rs 9,31,101 crore) measured in absolute current value.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >And this pattern was observed in all but one quarter.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 1962,
		'title' => '2009-10 turns out not all that bad for farm sector by Harish Damodaran',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<br />
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><em>Drought impacted agricultural production but not farm incomes.&nbsp; </em></font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The year 2009-10 was supposedly a bad year for Indian agriculture, given the worst ever monsoon since 1972.</font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">This is partly reflected in the 0.2 per cent growth registered by the farm sector (inclusive of forestry and fishing) in real terms, as per the Central Statistical Organisation's latest revised estimates of gross domestic product (GDP) for last fiscal.</font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The virtual stagnation in agricultural output contrasted with a 10.8 per cent increase in manufacturing, i.e. production from factories.</font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">However, real output growth (or lack of it) is not what ultimately counts, at least for the producer. For him, it is the increase in the value of produce &mdash; which is a function of output as well as price &mdash; that matters. This value, measured in current prices, is the income that accrues to him.</font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The value of agricultural output in current prices rose by 11.8 per cent during 2010-11, crossing the Rs 10 lakh crore mark for the first time. This was not substantially below the corresponding 14.4 per cent growth in manufacturing output value.</font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Simply put, last year's drought impacted agricultural production, but not farm incomes.</font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The loss (or near-zero growth) of output was more than offset by higher prices, as captured by the large gap between the &lsquo;nominal' (11.8 per cent) and &lsquo;real' (0.2 per cent) increase in agricultural GDP. So, while food inflation definitely hurt India, it may have been a blessing in disguise.</font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">On the other hand, the 14.4 per cent growth in manufacturing income was predominantly contributed by increased output (up 10.8 per cent), with corporates not having as much leeway to raise prices.</font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">It is only the last couple of months that have witnessed India Inc regain some pricing power &mdash; rising non-food manufacturing inflation and higher capacity utilisation levels reported by firms being proof of this.</font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The effect that favourable terms of trade had for agriculture during 2009-10 can be seen in the accompanying table, which compares farm GDP with manufacturing GDP in both real as well as current value terms.</font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">While in constant 2004-05 prices, the value of agricultural output (Rs 6,51,901 crore) stood below that of manufacturing (Rs 7,19,975 crore), it was just the other way (Rs 10,04,594 crore versus Rs 9,31,101 crore) measured in absolute current value.</font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">And this pattern was observed in all but one quarter.</font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font>
</p>
',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Business Line, 1 June, 2010, http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/2010/06/01/stories/2010060152530400.htm',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => '2009-10-turns-out-not-all-that-bad-for-farm-sector-by-harish-damodaran-2042',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 2042,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 1962,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 2009-10 turns out not all that bad for farm sector by Harish Damodaran',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Agriculture',
	'metaDesc' => '




Drought impacted agricultural production but not farm incomes.&nbsp; 


The year 2009-10 was supposedly a bad year for Indian agriculture, given the worst ever monsoon since 1972.


This is partly reflected in the 0.2 per cent growth registered by the farm sector...',
	'disp' => '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font ><em>Drought impacted agricultural production but not farm incomes.&nbsp; </em></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The year 2009-10 was supposedly a bad year for Indian agriculture, given the worst ever monsoon since 1972.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >This is partly reflected in the 0.2 per cent growth registered by the farm sector (inclusive of forestry and fishing) in real terms, as per the Central Statistical Organisation's latest revised estimates of gross domestic product (GDP) for last fiscal.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The virtual stagnation in agricultural output contrasted with a 10.8 per cent increase in manufacturing, i.e. production from factories.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >However, real output growth (or lack of it) is not what ultimately counts, at least for the producer. For him, it is the increase in the value of produce &mdash; which is a function of output as well as price &mdash; that matters. This value, measured in current prices, is the income that accrues to him.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The value of agricultural output in current prices rose by 11.8 per cent during 2010-11, crossing the Rs 10 lakh crore mark for the first time. This was not substantially below the corresponding 14.4 per cent growth in manufacturing output value.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Simply put, last year's drought impacted agricultural production, but not farm incomes.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The loss (or near-zero growth) of output was more than offset by higher prices, as captured by the large gap between the &lsquo;nominal' (11.8 per cent) and &lsquo;real' (0.2 per cent) increase in agricultural GDP. So, while food inflation definitely hurt India, it may have been a blessing in disguise.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >On the other hand, the 14.4 per cent growth in manufacturing income was predominantly contributed by increased output (up 10.8 per cent), with corporates not having as much leeway to raise prices.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >It is only the last couple of months that have witnessed India Inc regain some pricing power &mdash; rising non-food manufacturing inflation and higher capacity utilisation levels reported by firms being proof of this.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The effect that favourable terms of trade had for agriculture during 2009-10 can be seen in the accompanying table, which compares farm GDP with manufacturing GDP in both real as well as current value terms.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >While in constant 2004-05 prices, the value of agricultural output (Rs 6,51,901 crore) stood below that of manufacturing (Rs 7,19,975 crore), it was just the other way (Rs 10,04,594 crore versus Rs 9,31,101 crore) measured in absolute current value.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >And this pattern was observed in all but one quarter.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 1962,
	'title' => '2009-10 turns out not all that bad for farm sector by Harish Damodaran',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<br />
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><em>Drought impacted agricultural production but not farm incomes.&nbsp; </em></font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The year 2009-10 was supposedly a bad year for Indian agriculture, given the worst ever monsoon since 1972.</font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">This is partly reflected in the 0.2 per cent growth registered by the farm sector (inclusive of forestry and fishing) in real terms, as per the Central Statistical Organisation's latest revised estimates of gross domestic product (GDP) for last fiscal.</font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The virtual stagnation in agricultural output contrasted with a 10.8 per cent increase in manufacturing, i.e. production from factories.</font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">However, real output growth (or lack of it) is not what ultimately counts, at least for the producer. For him, it is the increase in the value of produce &mdash; which is a function of output as well as price &mdash; that matters. This value, measured in current prices, is the income that accrues to him.</font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The value of agricultural output in current prices rose by 11.8 per cent during 2010-11, crossing the Rs 10 lakh crore mark for the first time. This was not substantially below the corresponding 14.4 per cent growth in manufacturing output value.</font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Simply put, last year's drought impacted agricultural production, but not farm incomes.</font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The loss (or near-zero growth) of output was more than offset by higher prices, as captured by the large gap between the &lsquo;nominal' (11.8 per cent) and &lsquo;real' (0.2 per cent) increase in agricultural GDP. So, while food inflation definitely hurt India, it may have been a blessing in disguise.</font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">On the other hand, the 14.4 per cent growth in manufacturing income was predominantly contributed by increased output (up 10.8 per cent), with corporates not having as much leeway to raise prices.</font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">It is only the last couple of months that have witnessed India Inc regain some pricing power &mdash; rising non-food manufacturing inflation and higher capacity utilisation levels reported by firms being proof of this.</font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The effect that favourable terms of trade had for agriculture during 2009-10 can be seen in the accompanying table, which compares farm GDP with manufacturing GDP in both real as well as current value terms.</font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">While in constant 2004-05 prices, the value of agricultural output (Rs 6,51,901 crore) stood below that of manufacturing (Rs 7,19,975 crore), it was just the other way (Rs 10,04,594 crore versus Rs 9,31,101 crore) measured in absolute current value.</font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">And this pattern was observed in all but one quarter.</font>
</p>
<p align="justify">
<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font>
</p>
',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Business Line, 1 June, 2010, http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/2010/06/01/stories/2010060152530400.htm',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => '2009-10-turns-out-not-all-that-bad-for-farm-sector-by-harish-damodaran-2042',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 2042,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 1962
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 2009-10 turns out not all that bad for farm sector by Harish Damodaran'
$metaKeywords = 'Agriculture'
$metaDesc = '




Drought impacted agricultural production but not farm incomes.&nbsp; 


The year 2009-10 was supposedly a bad year for Indian agriculture, given the worst ever monsoon since 1972.


This is partly reflected in the 0.2 per cent growth registered by the farm sector...'
$disp = '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><br /><font ><em>Drought impacted agricultural production but not farm incomes.&nbsp; </em></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The year 2009-10 was supposedly a bad year for Indian agriculture, given the worst ever monsoon since 1972.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >This is partly reflected in the 0.2 per cent growth registered by the farm sector (inclusive of forestry and fishing) in real terms, as per the Central Statistical Organisation's latest revised estimates of gross domestic product (GDP) for last fiscal.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The virtual stagnation in agricultural output contrasted with a 10.8 per cent increase in manufacturing, i.e. production from factories.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >However, real output growth (or lack of it) is not what ultimately counts, at least for the producer. For him, it is the increase in the value of produce &mdash; which is a function of output as well as price &mdash; that matters. This value, measured in current prices, is the income that accrues to him.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The value of agricultural output in current prices rose by 11.8 per cent during 2010-11, crossing the Rs 10 lakh crore mark for the first time. This was not substantially below the corresponding 14.4 per cent growth in manufacturing output value.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Simply put, last year's drought impacted agricultural production, but not farm incomes.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The loss (or near-zero growth) of output was more than offset by higher prices, as captured by the large gap between the &lsquo;nominal' (11.8 per cent) and &lsquo;real' (0.2 per cent) increase in agricultural GDP. So, while food inflation definitely hurt India, it may have been a blessing in disguise.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >On the other hand, the 14.4 per cent growth in manufacturing income was predominantly contributed by increased output (up 10.8 per cent), with corporates not having as much leeway to raise prices.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >It is only the last couple of months that have witnessed India Inc regain some pricing power &mdash; rising non-food manufacturing inflation and higher capacity utilisation levels reported by firms being proof of this.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The effect that favourable terms of trade had for agriculture during 2009-10 can be seen in the accompanying table, which compares farm GDP with manufacturing GDP in both real as well as current value terms.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >While in constant 2004-05 prices, the value of agricultural output (Rs 6,51,901 crore) stood below that of manufacturing (Rs 7,19,975 crore), it was just the other way (Rs 10,04,594 crore versus Rs 9,31,101 crore) measured in absolute current value.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >And this pattern was observed in all but one quarter.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

2009-10 turns out not all that bad for farm sector by Harish Damodaran

Drought impacted agricultural production but not farm incomes.  The year 2009-10 was supposedly a bad year for Indian agriculture, given the worst ever monsoon since 1972. This is partly reflected in the 0.2 per cent growth registered by the farm sector (inclusive of forestry and fishing) in real terms, as per the Central Statistical Organisation's latest revised estimates of gross domestic product (GDP) for last fiscal. The virtual stagnation in agricultural output contrasted with a 10.8 per cent increase in manufacturing, i.e. production from factories. However, real output growth (or lack of it) is not what ultimately counts, at least for the producer. For him, it is the increase in the value of produce — which is a function of output as well as price — that matters. This value, measured in current prices, is the income that accrues to him. The value of agricultural output in current prices rose by 11.8 per cent during 2010-11, crossing the Rs 10 lakh crore mark for the first time. This was not substantially below the corresponding 14.4 per cent growth in manufacturing output value. Simply put, last year's drought impacted agricultural production, but not farm incomes. The loss (or near-zero growth) of output was more than offset by higher prices, as captured by the large gap between the ‘nominal' (11.8 per cent) and ‘real' (0.2 per cent) increase in agricultural GDP. So, while food inflation definitely hurt India, it may have been a blessing in disguise. On the other hand, the 14.4 per cent growth in manufacturing income was predominantly contributed by increased output (up 10.8 per cent), with corporates not having as much leeway to raise prices. It is only the last couple of months that have witnessed India Inc regain some pricing power — rising non-food manufacturing inflation and higher capacity utilisation levels reported by firms being proof of this. The effect that favourable terms of trade had for agriculture during 2009-10 can be seen in the accompanying table, which compares farm GDP with manufacturing GDP in both real as well as current value terms. While in constant 2004-05 prices, the value of agricultural output (Rs 6,51,901 crore) stood below that of manufacturing (Rs 7,19,975 crore), it was just the other way (Rs 10,04,594 crore versus Rs 9,31,101 crore) measured in absolute current value. And this pattern was observed in all but one quarter.