Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/21-websites-including-google-and-facebook-liable-to-face-prosecution-for-hosting-inflammatory-contents-12983/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/21-websites-including-google-and-facebook-liable-to-face-prosecution-for-hosting-inflammatory-contents-12983/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/21-websites-including-google-and-facebook-liable-to-face-prosecution-for-hosting-inflammatory-contents-12983/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/21-websites-including-google-and-facebook-liable-to-face-prosecution-for-hosting-inflammatory-contents-12983/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6123d5059e-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6123d5059e-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f6123d5059e-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6123d5059e-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6123d5059e-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6123d5059e-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6123d5059e-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f6123d5059e-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f6123d5059e-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 12863, 'title' => '21 websites including Google and Facebook liable to face prosecution for hosting inflammatory contents', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -PTI </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> All 21 websites, including Google and Facebook, summoned earlier by a magisterial court, are liable to face prosecution for being privy to the hosting of inflammatory contents on their webpages, the Delhi High Court was told today.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The counsel for one Vinay Rai, who had moved the trial court for prosecution of various websites, including social networking sites and web search engines, argued before a bench of Justice Suresh Kait that the websites were knowing about contents of their webpages and they cannot shun their criminal liability in the act.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Opposing Google's plea, Rai's counsel Hariharan said the US-based Google Inc and Google India are same and they had the knowledge of the contents because of their means and mechanism to monitor their web pages.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> They cannot seek protection under the Information Technology(IT) Act, he said.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;Protection under section 79 of the IT Act is not available to them as they are doing more than just providing space for posting the material,&quot; the counsel said.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;Google Inc has knowledge of existing objectionable material on its webpages and has also the means to check them,&quot; he said adding &quot;the foreign company works on the contents and makes advertisement on it.&quot;&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Arguing that the websites generate revenue through the advertisement on its cyber space, the lawyer submitted the websites cannot shun their liabilities.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;They are generating revenue by providing space and posting advertisements on it...,&quot; the counsel said.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Google Inc has affiliates and subsidiaries all over the world and they provide services on behalf of it, the counsel told the court.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Countering Google's argument that it has nothing to do with the third party contents, the lawyer said &quot;Google is entitled to pre-screen, refuse, review, remove, modify and filter before transmitting the contents.&quot;&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Meanwhile, the court dismissed a business man's plea to hear him in the case saying till date no court has passed any order which curtailed the citizens' fundamental rights of freedom of speech and expression.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A lower court had on December 23 issued summons to 21 websites for allegedly committing offences of criminal conspiracy, sale of obscene books and sale of obscene objects to young persons.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Earlier, the Centre had filed a report in the lower court saying there was sufficient material to proceed against the websites for alleged offences of promoting enmity between classes and causing prejudice to national integration.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Out of 21 websites, Google India, Facebook India and Yahoo India have approached the high court for quashing of magisterial court's summons to them.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Google India has sought discharge from the case saying it was not responsible for postings of &quot;obscene, objectionable and defamatory&quot; articles, which cannot be &quot;filtered&quot; or &quot;monitored&quot; either. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 2 February, 2012, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/tech/internet/21-websites-including-google-and-facebook-liable-to-face-prosecution-for-hosting-inflammatory-contents/articlesh', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => '21-websites-including-google-and-facebook-liable-to-face-prosecution-for-hosting-inflammatory-contents-12983', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 12983, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 12863, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 21 websites including Google and Facebook liable to face prosecution for hosting inflammatory contents', 'metaKeywords' => 'Freedom of Speech,internet,Law and Justice', 'metaDesc' => ' -PTI &nbsp; All 21 websites, including Google and Facebook, summoned earlier by a magisterial court, are liable to face prosecution for being privy to the hosting of inflammatory contents on their webpages, the Delhi High Court was told today.&nbsp; The counsel for one...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-PTI</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">All 21 websites, including Google and Facebook, summoned earlier by a magisterial court, are liable to face prosecution for being privy to the hosting of inflammatory contents on their webpages, the Delhi High Court was told today.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The counsel for one Vinay Rai, who had moved the trial court for prosecution of various websites, including social networking sites and web search engines, argued before a bench of Justice Suresh Kait that the websites were knowing about contents of their webpages and they cannot shun their criminal liability in the act.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Opposing Google's plea, Rai's counsel Hariharan said the US-based Google Inc and Google India are same and they had the knowledge of the contents because of their means and mechanism to monitor their web pages.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">They cannot seek protection under the Information Technology(IT) Act, he said.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;Protection under section 79 of the IT Act is not available to them as they are doing more than just providing space for posting the material,&quot; the counsel said.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;Google Inc has knowledge of existing objectionable material on its webpages and has also the means to check them,&quot; he said adding &quot;the foreign company works on the contents and makes advertisement on it.&quot;&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Arguing that the websites generate revenue through the advertisement on its cyber space, the lawyer submitted the websites cannot shun their liabilities.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;They are generating revenue by providing space and posting advertisements on it...,&quot; the counsel said.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Google Inc has affiliates and subsidiaries all over the world and they provide services on behalf of it, the counsel told the court.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Countering Google's argument that it has nothing to do with the third party contents, the lawyer said &quot;Google is entitled to pre-screen, refuse, review, remove, modify and filter before transmitting the contents.&quot;&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Meanwhile, the court dismissed a business man's plea to hear him in the case saying till date no court has passed any order which curtailed the citizens' fundamental rights of freedom of speech and expression.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A lower court had on December 23 issued summons to 21 websites for allegedly committing offences of criminal conspiracy, sale of obscene books and sale of obscene objects to young persons.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Earlier, the Centre had filed a report in the lower court saying there was sufficient material to proceed against the websites for alleged offences of promoting enmity between classes and causing prejudice to national integration.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Out of 21 websites, Google India, Facebook India and Yahoo India have approached the high court for quashing of magisterial court's summons to them.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Google India has sought discharge from the case saying it was not responsible for postings of &quot;obscene, objectionable and defamatory&quot; articles, which cannot be &quot;filtered&quot; or &quot;monitored&quot; either.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 12863, 'title' => '21 websites including Google and Facebook liable to face prosecution for hosting inflammatory contents', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -PTI </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> All 21 websites, including Google and Facebook, summoned earlier by a magisterial court, are liable to face prosecution for being privy to the hosting of inflammatory contents on their webpages, the Delhi High Court was told today.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The counsel for one Vinay Rai, who had moved the trial court for prosecution of various websites, including social networking sites and web search engines, argued before a bench of Justice Suresh Kait that the websites were knowing about contents of their webpages and they cannot shun their criminal liability in the act.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Opposing Google's plea, Rai's counsel Hariharan said the US-based Google Inc and Google India are same and they had the knowledge of the contents because of their means and mechanism to monitor their web pages.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> They cannot seek protection under the Information Technology(IT) Act, he said.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;Protection under section 79 of the IT Act is not available to them as they are doing more than just providing space for posting the material,&quot; the counsel said.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;Google Inc has knowledge of existing objectionable material on its webpages and has also the means to check them,&quot; he said adding &quot;the foreign company works on the contents and makes advertisement on it.&quot;&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Arguing that the websites generate revenue through the advertisement on its cyber space, the lawyer submitted the websites cannot shun their liabilities.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;They are generating revenue by providing space and posting advertisements on it...,&quot; the counsel said.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Google Inc has affiliates and subsidiaries all over the world and they provide services on behalf of it, the counsel told the court.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Countering Google's argument that it has nothing to do with the third party contents, the lawyer said &quot;Google is entitled to pre-screen, refuse, review, remove, modify and filter before transmitting the contents.&quot;&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Meanwhile, the court dismissed a business man's plea to hear him in the case saying till date no court has passed any order which curtailed the citizens' fundamental rights of freedom of speech and expression.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A lower court had on December 23 issued summons to 21 websites for allegedly committing offences of criminal conspiracy, sale of obscene books and sale of obscene objects to young persons.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Earlier, the Centre had filed a report in the lower court saying there was sufficient material to proceed against the websites for alleged offences of promoting enmity between classes and causing prejudice to national integration.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Out of 21 websites, Google India, Facebook India and Yahoo India have approached the high court for quashing of magisterial court's summons to them.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Google India has sought discharge from the case saying it was not responsible for postings of &quot;obscene, objectionable and defamatory&quot; articles, which cannot be &quot;filtered&quot; or &quot;monitored&quot; either. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 2 February, 2012, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/tech/internet/21-websites-including-google-and-facebook-liable-to-face-prosecution-for-hosting-inflammatory-contents/articlesh', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => '21-websites-including-google-and-facebook-liable-to-face-prosecution-for-hosting-inflammatory-contents-12983', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 12983, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 12863 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 21 websites including Google and Facebook liable to face prosecution for hosting inflammatory contents' $metaKeywords = 'Freedom of Speech,internet,Law and Justice' $metaDesc = ' -PTI &nbsp; All 21 websites, including Google and Facebook, summoned earlier by a magisterial court, are liable to face prosecution for being privy to the hosting of inflammatory contents on their webpages, the Delhi High Court was told today.&nbsp; The counsel for one...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-PTI</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">All 21 websites, including Google and Facebook, summoned earlier by a magisterial court, are liable to face prosecution for being privy to the hosting of inflammatory contents on their webpages, the Delhi High Court was told today.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The counsel for one Vinay Rai, who had moved the trial court for prosecution of various websites, including social networking sites and web search engines, argued before a bench of Justice Suresh Kait that the websites were knowing about contents of their webpages and they cannot shun their criminal liability in the act.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Opposing Google's plea, Rai's counsel Hariharan said the US-based Google Inc and Google India are same and they had the knowledge of the contents because of their means and mechanism to monitor their web pages.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">They cannot seek protection under the Information Technology(IT) Act, he said.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;Protection under section 79 of the IT Act is not available to them as they are doing more than just providing space for posting the material,&quot; the counsel said.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;Google Inc has knowledge of existing objectionable material on its webpages and has also the means to check them,&quot; he said adding &quot;the foreign company works on the contents and makes advertisement on it.&quot;&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Arguing that the websites generate revenue through the advertisement on its cyber space, the lawyer submitted the websites cannot shun their liabilities.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;They are generating revenue by providing space and posting advertisements on it...,&quot; the counsel said.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Google Inc has affiliates and subsidiaries all over the world and they provide services on behalf of it, the counsel told the court.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Countering Google's argument that it has nothing to do with the third party contents, the lawyer said &quot;Google is entitled to pre-screen, refuse, review, remove, modify and filter before transmitting the contents.&quot;&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Meanwhile, the court dismissed a business man's plea to hear him in the case saying till date no court has passed any order which curtailed the citizens' fundamental rights of freedom of speech and expression.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A lower court had on December 23 issued summons to 21 websites for allegedly committing offences of criminal conspiracy, sale of obscene books and sale of obscene objects to young persons.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Earlier, the Centre had filed a report in the lower court saying there was sufficient material to proceed against the websites for alleged offences of promoting enmity between classes and causing prejudice to national integration.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Out of 21 websites, Google India, Facebook India and Yahoo India have approached the high court for quashing of magisterial court's summons to them.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Google India has sought discharge from the case saying it was not responsible for postings of &quot;obscene, objectionable and defamatory&quot; articles, which cannot be &quot;filtered&quot; or &quot;monitored&quot; either.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/21-websites-including-google-and-facebook-liable-to-face-prosecution-for-hosting-inflammatory-contents-12983.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 21 websites including Google and Facebook liable to face prosecution for hosting inflammatory contents | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -PTI All 21 websites, including Google and Facebook, summoned earlier by a magisterial court, are liable to face prosecution for being privy to the hosting of inflammatory contents on their webpages, the Delhi High Court was told today. The counsel for one..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>21 websites including Google and Facebook liable to face prosecution for hosting inflammatory contents</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-PTI</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">All 21 websites, including Google and Facebook, summoned earlier by a magisterial court, are liable to face prosecution for being privy to the hosting of inflammatory contents on their webpages, the Delhi High Court was told today. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The counsel for one Vinay Rai, who had moved the trial court for prosecution of various websites, including social networking sites and web search engines, argued before a bench of Justice Suresh Kait that the websites were knowing about contents of their webpages and they cannot shun their criminal liability in the act. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Opposing Google's plea, Rai's counsel Hariharan said the US-based Google Inc and Google India are same and they had the knowledge of the contents because of their means and mechanism to monitor their web pages. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">They cannot seek protection under the Information Technology(IT) Act, he said. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"Protection under section 79 of the IT Act is not available to them as they are doing more than just providing space for posting the material," the counsel said. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"Google Inc has knowledge of existing objectionable material on its webpages and has also the means to check them," he said adding "the foreign company works on the contents and makes advertisement on it." </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Arguing that the websites generate revenue through the advertisement on its cyber space, the lawyer submitted the websites cannot shun their liabilities. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"They are generating revenue by providing space and posting advertisements on it...," the counsel said. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Google Inc has affiliates and subsidiaries all over the world and they provide services on behalf of it, the counsel told the court. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Countering Google's argument that it has nothing to do with the third party contents, the lawyer said "Google is entitled to pre-screen, refuse, review, remove, modify and filter before transmitting the contents." </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Meanwhile, the court dismissed a business man's plea to hear him in the case saying till date no court has passed any order which curtailed the citizens' fundamental rights of freedom of speech and expression. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A lower court had on December 23 issued summons to 21 websites for allegedly committing offences of criminal conspiracy, sale of obscene books and sale of obscene objects to young persons. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Earlier, the Centre had filed a report in the lower court saying there was sufficient material to proceed against the websites for alleged offences of promoting enmity between classes and causing prejudice to national integration. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Out of 21 websites, Google India, Facebook India and Yahoo India have approached the high court for quashing of magisterial court's summons to them. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Google India has sought discharge from the case saying it was not responsible for postings of "obscene, objectionable and defamatory" articles, which cannot be "filtered" or "monitored" either.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6123d5059e-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6123d5059e-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f6123d5059e-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6123d5059e-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6123d5059e-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6123d5059e-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6123d5059e-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f6123d5059e-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f6123d5059e-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 12863, 'title' => '21 websites including Google and Facebook liable to face prosecution for hosting inflammatory contents', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -PTI </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> All 21 websites, including Google and Facebook, summoned earlier by a magisterial court, are liable to face prosecution for being privy to the hosting of inflammatory contents on their webpages, the Delhi High Court was told today.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The counsel for one Vinay Rai, who had moved the trial court for prosecution of various websites, including social networking sites and web search engines, argued before a bench of Justice Suresh Kait that the websites were knowing about contents of their webpages and they cannot shun their criminal liability in the act.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Opposing Google's plea, Rai's counsel Hariharan said the US-based Google Inc and Google India are same and they had the knowledge of the contents because of their means and mechanism to monitor their web pages.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> They cannot seek protection under the Information Technology(IT) Act, he said.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;Protection under section 79 of the IT Act is not available to them as they are doing more than just providing space for posting the material,&quot; the counsel said.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;Google Inc has knowledge of existing objectionable material on its webpages and has also the means to check them,&quot; he said adding &quot;the foreign company works on the contents and makes advertisement on it.&quot;&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Arguing that the websites generate revenue through the advertisement on its cyber space, the lawyer submitted the websites cannot shun their liabilities.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;They are generating revenue by providing space and posting advertisements on it...,&quot; the counsel said.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Google Inc has affiliates and subsidiaries all over the world and they provide services on behalf of it, the counsel told the court.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Countering Google's argument that it has nothing to do with the third party contents, the lawyer said &quot;Google is entitled to pre-screen, refuse, review, remove, modify and filter before transmitting the contents.&quot;&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Meanwhile, the court dismissed a business man's plea to hear him in the case saying till date no court has passed any order which curtailed the citizens' fundamental rights of freedom of speech and expression.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A lower court had on December 23 issued summons to 21 websites for allegedly committing offences of criminal conspiracy, sale of obscene books and sale of obscene objects to young persons.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Earlier, the Centre had filed a report in the lower court saying there was sufficient material to proceed against the websites for alleged offences of promoting enmity between classes and causing prejudice to national integration.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Out of 21 websites, Google India, Facebook India and Yahoo India have approached the high court for quashing of magisterial court's summons to them.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Google India has sought discharge from the case saying it was not responsible for postings of &quot;obscene, objectionable and defamatory&quot; articles, which cannot be &quot;filtered&quot; or &quot;monitored&quot; either. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 2 February, 2012, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/tech/internet/21-websites-including-google-and-facebook-liable-to-face-prosecution-for-hosting-inflammatory-contents/articlesh', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => '21-websites-including-google-and-facebook-liable-to-face-prosecution-for-hosting-inflammatory-contents-12983', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 12983, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 12863, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 21 websites including Google and Facebook liable to face prosecution for hosting inflammatory contents', 'metaKeywords' => 'Freedom of Speech,internet,Law and Justice', 'metaDesc' => ' -PTI &nbsp; All 21 websites, including Google and Facebook, summoned earlier by a magisterial court, are liable to face prosecution for being privy to the hosting of inflammatory contents on their webpages, the Delhi High Court was told today.&nbsp; The counsel for one...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-PTI</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">All 21 websites, including Google and Facebook, summoned earlier by a magisterial court, are liable to face prosecution for being privy to the hosting of inflammatory contents on their webpages, the Delhi High Court was told today.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The counsel for one Vinay Rai, who had moved the trial court for prosecution of various websites, including social networking sites and web search engines, argued before a bench of Justice Suresh Kait that the websites were knowing about contents of their webpages and they cannot shun their criminal liability in the act.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Opposing Google's plea, Rai's counsel Hariharan said the US-based Google Inc and Google India are same and they had the knowledge of the contents because of their means and mechanism to monitor their web pages.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">They cannot seek protection under the Information Technology(IT) Act, he said.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;Protection under section 79 of the IT Act is not available to them as they are doing more than just providing space for posting the material,&quot; the counsel said.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;Google Inc has knowledge of existing objectionable material on its webpages and has also the means to check them,&quot; he said adding &quot;the foreign company works on the contents and makes advertisement on it.&quot;&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Arguing that the websites generate revenue through the advertisement on its cyber space, the lawyer submitted the websites cannot shun their liabilities.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;They are generating revenue by providing space and posting advertisements on it...,&quot; the counsel said.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Google Inc has affiliates and subsidiaries all over the world and they provide services on behalf of it, the counsel told the court.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Countering Google's argument that it has nothing to do with the third party contents, the lawyer said &quot;Google is entitled to pre-screen, refuse, review, remove, modify and filter before transmitting the contents.&quot;&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Meanwhile, the court dismissed a business man's plea to hear him in the case saying till date no court has passed any order which curtailed the citizens' fundamental rights of freedom of speech and expression.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A lower court had on December 23 issued summons to 21 websites for allegedly committing offences of criminal conspiracy, sale of obscene books and sale of obscene objects to young persons.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Earlier, the Centre had filed a report in the lower court saying there was sufficient material to proceed against the websites for alleged offences of promoting enmity between classes and causing prejudice to national integration.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Out of 21 websites, Google India, Facebook India and Yahoo India have approached the high court for quashing of magisterial court's summons to them.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Google India has sought discharge from the case saying it was not responsible for postings of &quot;obscene, objectionable and defamatory&quot; articles, which cannot be &quot;filtered&quot; or &quot;monitored&quot; either.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 12863, 'title' => '21 websites including Google and Facebook liable to face prosecution for hosting inflammatory contents', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -PTI </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> All 21 websites, including Google and Facebook, summoned earlier by a magisterial court, are liable to face prosecution for being privy to the hosting of inflammatory contents on their webpages, the Delhi High Court was told today.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The counsel for one Vinay Rai, who had moved the trial court for prosecution of various websites, including social networking sites and web search engines, argued before a bench of Justice Suresh Kait that the websites were knowing about contents of their webpages and they cannot shun their criminal liability in the act.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Opposing Google's plea, Rai's counsel Hariharan said the US-based Google Inc and Google India are same and they had the knowledge of the contents because of their means and mechanism to monitor their web pages.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> They cannot seek protection under the Information Technology(IT) Act, he said.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;Protection under section 79 of the IT Act is not available to them as they are doing more than just providing space for posting the material,&quot; the counsel said.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;Google Inc has knowledge of existing objectionable material on its webpages and has also the means to check them,&quot; he said adding &quot;the foreign company works on the contents and makes advertisement on it.&quot;&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Arguing that the websites generate revenue through the advertisement on its cyber space, the lawyer submitted the websites cannot shun their liabilities.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;They are generating revenue by providing space and posting advertisements on it...,&quot; the counsel said.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Google Inc has affiliates and subsidiaries all over the world and they provide services on behalf of it, the counsel told the court.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Countering Google's argument that it has nothing to do with the third party contents, the lawyer said &quot;Google is entitled to pre-screen, refuse, review, remove, modify and filter before transmitting the contents.&quot;&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Meanwhile, the court dismissed a business man's plea to hear him in the case saying till date no court has passed any order which curtailed the citizens' fundamental rights of freedom of speech and expression.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A lower court had on December 23 issued summons to 21 websites for allegedly committing offences of criminal conspiracy, sale of obscene books and sale of obscene objects to young persons.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Earlier, the Centre had filed a report in the lower court saying there was sufficient material to proceed against the websites for alleged offences of promoting enmity between classes and causing prejudice to national integration.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Out of 21 websites, Google India, Facebook India and Yahoo India have approached the high court for quashing of magisterial court's summons to them.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Google India has sought discharge from the case saying it was not responsible for postings of &quot;obscene, objectionable and defamatory&quot; articles, which cannot be &quot;filtered&quot; or &quot;monitored&quot; either. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 2 February, 2012, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/tech/internet/21-websites-including-google-and-facebook-liable-to-face-prosecution-for-hosting-inflammatory-contents/articlesh', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => '21-websites-including-google-and-facebook-liable-to-face-prosecution-for-hosting-inflammatory-contents-12983', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 12983, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 12863 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 21 websites including Google and Facebook liable to face prosecution for hosting inflammatory contents' $metaKeywords = 'Freedom of Speech,internet,Law and Justice' $metaDesc = ' -PTI &nbsp; All 21 websites, including Google and Facebook, summoned earlier by a magisterial court, are liable to face prosecution for being privy to the hosting of inflammatory contents on their webpages, the Delhi High Court was told today.&nbsp; The counsel for one...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-PTI</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">All 21 websites, including Google and Facebook, summoned earlier by a magisterial court, are liable to face prosecution for being privy to the hosting of inflammatory contents on their webpages, the Delhi High Court was told today.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The counsel for one Vinay Rai, who had moved the trial court for prosecution of various websites, including social networking sites and web search engines, argued before a bench of Justice Suresh Kait that the websites were knowing about contents of their webpages and they cannot shun their criminal liability in the act.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Opposing Google's plea, Rai's counsel Hariharan said the US-based Google Inc and Google India are same and they had the knowledge of the contents because of their means and mechanism to monitor their web pages.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">They cannot seek protection under the Information Technology(IT) Act, he said.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;Protection under section 79 of the IT Act is not available to them as they are doing more than just providing space for posting the material,&quot; the counsel said.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;Google Inc has knowledge of existing objectionable material on its webpages and has also the means to check them,&quot; he said adding &quot;the foreign company works on the contents and makes advertisement on it.&quot;&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Arguing that the websites generate revenue through the advertisement on its cyber space, the lawyer submitted the websites cannot shun their liabilities.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;They are generating revenue by providing space and posting advertisements on it...,&quot; the counsel said.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Google Inc has affiliates and subsidiaries all over the world and they provide services on behalf of it, the counsel told the court.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Countering Google's argument that it has nothing to do with the third party contents, the lawyer said &quot;Google is entitled to pre-screen, refuse, review, remove, modify and filter before transmitting the contents.&quot;&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Meanwhile, the court dismissed a business man's plea to hear him in the case saying till date no court has passed any order which curtailed the citizens' fundamental rights of freedom of speech and expression.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A lower court had on December 23 issued summons to 21 websites for allegedly committing offences of criminal conspiracy, sale of obscene books and sale of obscene objects to young persons.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Earlier, the Centre had filed a report in the lower court saying there was sufficient material to proceed against the websites for alleged offences of promoting enmity between classes and causing prejudice to national integration.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Out of 21 websites, Google India, Facebook India and Yahoo India have approached the high court for quashing of magisterial court's summons to them.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Google India has sought discharge from the case saying it was not responsible for postings of &quot;obscene, objectionable and defamatory&quot; articles, which cannot be &quot;filtered&quot; or &quot;monitored&quot; either.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/21-websites-including-google-and-facebook-liable-to-face-prosecution-for-hosting-inflammatory-contents-12983.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 21 websites including Google and Facebook liable to face prosecution for hosting inflammatory contents | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -PTI All 21 websites, including Google and Facebook, summoned earlier by a magisterial court, are liable to face prosecution for being privy to the hosting of inflammatory contents on their webpages, the Delhi High Court was told today. The counsel for one..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>21 websites including Google and Facebook liable to face prosecution for hosting inflammatory contents</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-PTI</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">All 21 websites, including Google and Facebook, summoned earlier by a magisterial court, are liable to face prosecution for being privy to the hosting of inflammatory contents on their webpages, the Delhi High Court was told today. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The counsel for one Vinay Rai, who had moved the trial court for prosecution of various websites, including social networking sites and web search engines, argued before a bench of Justice Suresh Kait that the websites were knowing about contents of their webpages and they cannot shun their criminal liability in the act. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Opposing Google's plea, Rai's counsel Hariharan said the US-based Google Inc and Google India are same and they had the knowledge of the contents because of their means and mechanism to monitor their web pages. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">They cannot seek protection under the Information Technology(IT) Act, he said. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"Protection under section 79 of the IT Act is not available to them as they are doing more than just providing space for posting the material," the counsel said. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"Google Inc has knowledge of existing objectionable material on its webpages and has also the means to check them," he said adding "the foreign company works on the contents and makes advertisement on it." </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Arguing that the websites generate revenue through the advertisement on its cyber space, the lawyer submitted the websites cannot shun their liabilities. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"They are generating revenue by providing space and posting advertisements on it...," the counsel said. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Google Inc has affiliates and subsidiaries all over the world and they provide services on behalf of it, the counsel told the court. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Countering Google's argument that it has nothing to do with the third party contents, the lawyer said "Google is entitled to pre-screen, refuse, review, remove, modify and filter before transmitting the contents." </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Meanwhile, the court dismissed a business man's plea to hear him in the case saying till date no court has passed any order which curtailed the citizens' fundamental rights of freedom of speech and expression. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A lower court had on December 23 issued summons to 21 websites for allegedly committing offences of criminal conspiracy, sale of obscene books and sale of obscene objects to young persons. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Earlier, the Centre had filed a report in the lower court saying there was sufficient material to proceed against the websites for alleged offences of promoting enmity between classes and causing prejudice to national integration. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Out of 21 websites, Google India, Facebook India and Yahoo India have approached the high court for quashing of magisterial court's summons to them. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Google India has sought discharge from the case saying it was not responsible for postings of "obscene, objectionable and defamatory" articles, which cannot be "filtered" or "monitored" either.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6123d5059e-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6123d5059e-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f6123d5059e-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6123d5059e-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6123d5059e-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6123d5059e-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6123d5059e-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f6123d5059e-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f6123d5059e-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 12863, 'title' => '21 websites including Google and Facebook liable to face prosecution for hosting inflammatory contents', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -PTI </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> All 21 websites, including Google and Facebook, summoned earlier by a magisterial court, are liable to face prosecution for being privy to the hosting of inflammatory contents on their webpages, the Delhi High Court was told today.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The counsel for one Vinay Rai, who had moved the trial court for prosecution of various websites, including social networking sites and web search engines, argued before a bench of Justice Suresh Kait that the websites were knowing about contents of their webpages and they cannot shun their criminal liability in the act.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Opposing Google's plea, Rai's counsel Hariharan said the US-based Google Inc and Google India are same and they had the knowledge of the contents because of their means and mechanism to monitor their web pages.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> They cannot seek protection under the Information Technology(IT) Act, he said.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;Protection under section 79 of the IT Act is not available to them as they are doing more than just providing space for posting the material,&quot; the counsel said.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;Google Inc has knowledge of existing objectionable material on its webpages and has also the means to check them,&quot; he said adding &quot;the foreign company works on the contents and makes advertisement on it.&quot;&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Arguing that the websites generate revenue through the advertisement on its cyber space, the lawyer submitted the websites cannot shun their liabilities.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;They are generating revenue by providing space and posting advertisements on it...,&quot; the counsel said.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Google Inc has affiliates and subsidiaries all over the world and they provide services on behalf of it, the counsel told the court.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Countering Google's argument that it has nothing to do with the third party contents, the lawyer said &quot;Google is entitled to pre-screen, refuse, review, remove, modify and filter before transmitting the contents.&quot;&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Meanwhile, the court dismissed a business man's plea to hear him in the case saying till date no court has passed any order which curtailed the citizens' fundamental rights of freedom of speech and expression.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A lower court had on December 23 issued summons to 21 websites for allegedly committing offences of criminal conspiracy, sale of obscene books and sale of obscene objects to young persons.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Earlier, the Centre had filed a report in the lower court saying there was sufficient material to proceed against the websites for alleged offences of promoting enmity between classes and causing prejudice to national integration.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Out of 21 websites, Google India, Facebook India and Yahoo India have approached the high court for quashing of magisterial court's summons to them.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Google India has sought discharge from the case saying it was not responsible for postings of &quot;obscene, objectionable and defamatory&quot; articles, which cannot be &quot;filtered&quot; or &quot;monitored&quot; either. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 2 February, 2012, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/tech/internet/21-websites-including-google-and-facebook-liable-to-face-prosecution-for-hosting-inflammatory-contents/articlesh', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => '21-websites-including-google-and-facebook-liable-to-face-prosecution-for-hosting-inflammatory-contents-12983', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 12983, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 12863, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 21 websites including Google and Facebook liable to face prosecution for hosting inflammatory contents', 'metaKeywords' => 'Freedom of Speech,internet,Law and Justice', 'metaDesc' => ' -PTI &nbsp; All 21 websites, including Google and Facebook, summoned earlier by a magisterial court, are liable to face prosecution for being privy to the hosting of inflammatory contents on their webpages, the Delhi High Court was told today.&nbsp; The counsel for one...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-PTI</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">All 21 websites, including Google and Facebook, summoned earlier by a magisterial court, are liable to face prosecution for being privy to the hosting of inflammatory contents on their webpages, the Delhi High Court was told today.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The counsel for one Vinay Rai, who had moved the trial court for prosecution of various websites, including social networking sites and web search engines, argued before a bench of Justice Suresh Kait that the websites were knowing about contents of their webpages and they cannot shun their criminal liability in the act.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Opposing Google's plea, Rai's counsel Hariharan said the US-based Google Inc and Google India are same and they had the knowledge of the contents because of their means and mechanism to monitor their web pages.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">They cannot seek protection under the Information Technology(IT) Act, he said.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;Protection under section 79 of the IT Act is not available to them as they are doing more than just providing space for posting the material,&quot; the counsel said.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;Google Inc has knowledge of existing objectionable material on its webpages and has also the means to check them,&quot; he said adding &quot;the foreign company works on the contents and makes advertisement on it.&quot;&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Arguing that the websites generate revenue through the advertisement on its cyber space, the lawyer submitted the websites cannot shun their liabilities.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;They are generating revenue by providing space and posting advertisements on it...,&quot; the counsel said.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Google Inc has affiliates and subsidiaries all over the world and they provide services on behalf of it, the counsel told the court.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Countering Google's argument that it has nothing to do with the third party contents, the lawyer said &quot;Google is entitled to pre-screen, refuse, review, remove, modify and filter before transmitting the contents.&quot;&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Meanwhile, the court dismissed a business man's plea to hear him in the case saying till date no court has passed any order which curtailed the citizens' fundamental rights of freedom of speech and expression.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A lower court had on December 23 issued summons to 21 websites for allegedly committing offences of criminal conspiracy, sale of obscene books and sale of obscene objects to young persons.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Earlier, the Centre had filed a report in the lower court saying there was sufficient material to proceed against the websites for alleged offences of promoting enmity between classes and causing prejudice to national integration.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Out of 21 websites, Google India, Facebook India and Yahoo India have approached the high court for quashing of magisterial court's summons to them.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Google India has sought discharge from the case saying it was not responsible for postings of &quot;obscene, objectionable and defamatory&quot; articles, which cannot be &quot;filtered&quot; or &quot;monitored&quot; either.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 12863, 'title' => '21 websites including Google and Facebook liable to face prosecution for hosting inflammatory contents', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -PTI </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> All 21 websites, including Google and Facebook, summoned earlier by a magisterial court, are liable to face prosecution for being privy to the hosting of inflammatory contents on their webpages, the Delhi High Court was told today.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The counsel for one Vinay Rai, who had moved the trial court for prosecution of various websites, including social networking sites and web search engines, argued before a bench of Justice Suresh Kait that the websites were knowing about contents of their webpages and they cannot shun their criminal liability in the act.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Opposing Google's plea, Rai's counsel Hariharan said the US-based Google Inc and Google India are same and they had the knowledge of the contents because of their means and mechanism to monitor their web pages.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> They cannot seek protection under the Information Technology(IT) Act, he said.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;Protection under section 79 of the IT Act is not available to them as they are doing more than just providing space for posting the material,&quot; the counsel said.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;Google Inc has knowledge of existing objectionable material on its webpages and has also the means to check them,&quot; he said adding &quot;the foreign company works on the contents and makes advertisement on it.&quot;&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Arguing that the websites generate revenue through the advertisement on its cyber space, the lawyer submitted the websites cannot shun their liabilities.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;They are generating revenue by providing space and posting advertisements on it...,&quot; the counsel said.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Google Inc has affiliates and subsidiaries all over the world and they provide services on behalf of it, the counsel told the court.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Countering Google's argument that it has nothing to do with the third party contents, the lawyer said &quot;Google is entitled to pre-screen, refuse, review, remove, modify and filter before transmitting the contents.&quot;&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Meanwhile, the court dismissed a business man's plea to hear him in the case saying till date no court has passed any order which curtailed the citizens' fundamental rights of freedom of speech and expression.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A lower court had on December 23 issued summons to 21 websites for allegedly committing offences of criminal conspiracy, sale of obscene books and sale of obscene objects to young persons.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Earlier, the Centre had filed a report in the lower court saying there was sufficient material to proceed against the websites for alleged offences of promoting enmity between classes and causing prejudice to national integration.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Out of 21 websites, Google India, Facebook India and Yahoo India have approached the high court for quashing of magisterial court's summons to them.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Google India has sought discharge from the case saying it was not responsible for postings of &quot;obscene, objectionable and defamatory&quot; articles, which cannot be &quot;filtered&quot; or &quot;monitored&quot; either. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 2 February, 2012, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/tech/internet/21-websites-including-google-and-facebook-liable-to-face-prosecution-for-hosting-inflammatory-contents/articlesh', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => '21-websites-including-google-and-facebook-liable-to-face-prosecution-for-hosting-inflammatory-contents-12983', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 12983, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 12863 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 21 websites including Google and Facebook liable to face prosecution for hosting inflammatory contents' $metaKeywords = 'Freedom of Speech,internet,Law and Justice' $metaDesc = ' -PTI &nbsp; All 21 websites, including Google and Facebook, summoned earlier by a magisterial court, are liable to face prosecution for being privy to the hosting of inflammatory contents on their webpages, the Delhi High Court was told today.&nbsp; The counsel for one...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-PTI</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">All 21 websites, including Google and Facebook, summoned earlier by a magisterial court, are liable to face prosecution for being privy to the hosting of inflammatory contents on their webpages, the Delhi High Court was told today.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The counsel for one Vinay Rai, who had moved the trial court for prosecution of various websites, including social networking sites and web search engines, argued before a bench of Justice Suresh Kait that the websites were knowing about contents of their webpages and they cannot shun their criminal liability in the act.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Opposing Google's plea, Rai's counsel Hariharan said the US-based Google Inc and Google India are same and they had the knowledge of the contents because of their means and mechanism to monitor their web pages.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">They cannot seek protection under the Information Technology(IT) Act, he said.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;Protection under section 79 of the IT Act is not available to them as they are doing more than just providing space for posting the material,&quot; the counsel said.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;Google Inc has knowledge of existing objectionable material on its webpages and has also the means to check them,&quot; he said adding &quot;the foreign company works on the contents and makes advertisement on it.&quot;&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Arguing that the websites generate revenue through the advertisement on its cyber space, the lawyer submitted the websites cannot shun their liabilities.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;They are generating revenue by providing space and posting advertisements on it...,&quot; the counsel said.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Google Inc has affiliates and subsidiaries all over the world and they provide services on behalf of it, the counsel told the court.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Countering Google's argument that it has nothing to do with the third party contents, the lawyer said &quot;Google is entitled to pre-screen, refuse, review, remove, modify and filter before transmitting the contents.&quot;&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Meanwhile, the court dismissed a business man's plea to hear him in the case saying till date no court has passed any order which curtailed the citizens' fundamental rights of freedom of speech and expression.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A lower court had on December 23 issued summons to 21 websites for allegedly committing offences of criminal conspiracy, sale of obscene books and sale of obscene objects to young persons.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Earlier, the Centre had filed a report in the lower court saying there was sufficient material to proceed against the websites for alleged offences of promoting enmity between classes and causing prejudice to national integration.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Out of 21 websites, Google India, Facebook India and Yahoo India have approached the high court for quashing of magisterial court's summons to them.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Google India has sought discharge from the case saying it was not responsible for postings of &quot;obscene, objectionable and defamatory&quot; articles, which cannot be &quot;filtered&quot; or &quot;monitored&quot; either.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/21-websites-including-google-and-facebook-liable-to-face-prosecution-for-hosting-inflammatory-contents-12983.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 21 websites including Google and Facebook liable to face prosecution for hosting inflammatory contents | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -PTI All 21 websites, including Google and Facebook, summoned earlier by a magisterial court, are liable to face prosecution for being privy to the hosting of inflammatory contents on their webpages, the Delhi High Court was told today. The counsel for one..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>21 websites including Google and Facebook liable to face prosecution for hosting inflammatory contents</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-PTI</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">All 21 websites, including Google and Facebook, summoned earlier by a magisterial court, are liable to face prosecution for being privy to the hosting of inflammatory contents on their webpages, the Delhi High Court was told today. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The counsel for one Vinay Rai, who had moved the trial court for prosecution of various websites, including social networking sites and web search engines, argued before a bench of Justice Suresh Kait that the websites were knowing about contents of their webpages and they cannot shun their criminal liability in the act. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Opposing Google's plea, Rai's counsel Hariharan said the US-based Google Inc and Google India are same and they had the knowledge of the contents because of their means and mechanism to monitor their web pages. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">They cannot seek protection under the Information Technology(IT) Act, he said. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"Protection under section 79 of the IT Act is not available to them as they are doing more than just providing space for posting the material," the counsel said. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"Google Inc has knowledge of existing objectionable material on its webpages and has also the means to check them," he said adding "the foreign company works on the contents and makes advertisement on it." </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Arguing that the websites generate revenue through the advertisement on its cyber space, the lawyer submitted the websites cannot shun their liabilities. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"They are generating revenue by providing space and posting advertisements on it...," the counsel said. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Google Inc has affiliates and subsidiaries all over the world and they provide services on behalf of it, the counsel told the court. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Countering Google's argument that it has nothing to do with the third party contents, the lawyer said "Google is entitled to pre-screen, refuse, review, remove, modify and filter before transmitting the contents." </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Meanwhile, the court dismissed a business man's plea to hear him in the case saying till date no court has passed any order which curtailed the citizens' fundamental rights of freedom of speech and expression. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A lower court had on December 23 issued summons to 21 websites for allegedly committing offences of criminal conspiracy, sale of obscene books and sale of obscene objects to young persons. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Earlier, the Centre had filed a report in the lower court saying there was sufficient material to proceed against the websites for alleged offences of promoting enmity between classes and causing prejudice to national integration. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Out of 21 websites, Google India, Facebook India and Yahoo India have approached the high court for quashing of magisterial court's summons to them. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Google India has sought discharge from the case saying it was not responsible for postings of "obscene, objectionable and defamatory" articles, which cannot be "filtered" or "monitored" either.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 12863, 'title' => '21 websites including Google and Facebook liable to face prosecution for hosting inflammatory contents', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -PTI </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> All 21 websites, including Google and Facebook, summoned earlier by a magisterial court, are liable to face prosecution for being privy to the hosting of inflammatory contents on their webpages, the Delhi High Court was told today. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The counsel for one Vinay Rai, who had moved the trial court for prosecution of various websites, including social networking sites and web search engines, argued before a bench of Justice Suresh Kait that the websites were knowing about contents of their webpages and they cannot shun their criminal liability in the act. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Opposing Google's plea, Rai's counsel Hariharan said the US-based Google Inc and Google India are same and they had the knowledge of the contents because of their means and mechanism to monitor their web pages. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> They cannot seek protection under the Information Technology(IT) Act, he said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> "Protection under section 79 of the IT Act is not available to them as they are doing more than just providing space for posting the material," the counsel said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> "Google Inc has knowledge of existing objectionable material on its webpages and has also the means to check them," he said adding "the foreign company works on the contents and makes advertisement on it." </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Arguing that the websites generate revenue through the advertisement on its cyber space, the lawyer submitted the websites cannot shun their liabilities. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> "They are generating revenue by providing space and posting advertisements on it...," the counsel said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Google Inc has affiliates and subsidiaries all over the world and they provide services on behalf of it, the counsel told the court. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Countering Google's argument that it has nothing to do with the third party contents, the lawyer said "Google is entitled to pre-screen, refuse, review, remove, modify and filter before transmitting the contents." </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Meanwhile, the court dismissed a business man's plea to hear him in the case saying till date no court has passed any order which curtailed the citizens' fundamental rights of freedom of speech and expression. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A lower court had on December 23 issued summons to 21 websites for allegedly committing offences of criminal conspiracy, sale of obscene books and sale of obscene objects to young persons. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Earlier, the Centre had filed a report in the lower court saying there was sufficient material to proceed against the websites for alleged offences of promoting enmity between classes and causing prejudice to national integration. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Out of 21 websites, Google India, Facebook India and Yahoo India have approached the high court for quashing of magisterial court's summons to them. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Google India has sought discharge from the case saying it was not responsible for postings of "obscene, objectionable and defamatory" articles, which cannot be "filtered" or "monitored" either. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 2 February, 2012, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/tech/internet/21-websites-including-google-and-facebook-liable-to-face-prosecution-for-hosting-inflammatory-contents/articlesh', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => '21-websites-including-google-and-facebook-liable-to-face-prosecution-for-hosting-inflammatory-contents-12983', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 12983, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 12863, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 21 websites including Google and Facebook liable to face prosecution for hosting inflammatory contents', 'metaKeywords' => 'Freedom of Speech,internet,Law and Justice', 'metaDesc' => ' -PTI All 21 websites, including Google and Facebook, summoned earlier by a magisterial court, are liable to face prosecution for being privy to the hosting of inflammatory contents on their webpages, the Delhi High Court was told today. The counsel for one...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-PTI</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">All 21 websites, including Google and Facebook, summoned earlier by a magisterial court, are liable to face prosecution for being privy to the hosting of inflammatory contents on their webpages, the Delhi High Court was told today. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The counsel for one Vinay Rai, who had moved the trial court for prosecution of various websites, including social networking sites and web search engines, argued before a bench of Justice Suresh Kait that the websites were knowing about contents of their webpages and they cannot shun their criminal liability in the act. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Opposing Google's plea, Rai's counsel Hariharan said the US-based Google Inc and Google India are same and they had the knowledge of the contents because of their means and mechanism to monitor their web pages. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">They cannot seek protection under the Information Technology(IT) Act, he said. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"Protection under section 79 of the IT Act is not available to them as they are doing more than just providing space for posting the material," the counsel said. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"Google Inc has knowledge of existing objectionable material on its webpages and has also the means to check them," he said adding "the foreign company works on the contents and makes advertisement on it." </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Arguing that the websites generate revenue through the advertisement on its cyber space, the lawyer submitted the websites cannot shun their liabilities. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"They are generating revenue by providing space and posting advertisements on it...," the counsel said. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Google Inc has affiliates and subsidiaries all over the world and they provide services on behalf of it, the counsel told the court. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Countering Google's argument that it has nothing to do with the third party contents, the lawyer said "Google is entitled to pre-screen, refuse, review, remove, modify and filter before transmitting the contents." </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Meanwhile, the court dismissed a business man's plea to hear him in the case saying till date no court has passed any order which curtailed the citizens' fundamental rights of freedom of speech and expression. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A lower court had on December 23 issued summons to 21 websites for allegedly committing offences of criminal conspiracy, sale of obscene books and sale of obscene objects to young persons. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Earlier, the Centre had filed a report in the lower court saying there was sufficient material to proceed against the websites for alleged offences of promoting enmity between classes and causing prejudice to national integration. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Out of 21 websites, Google India, Facebook India and Yahoo India have approached the high court for quashing of magisterial court's summons to them. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Google India has sought discharge from the case saying it was not responsible for postings of "obscene, objectionable and defamatory" articles, which cannot be "filtered" or "monitored" either.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 12863, 'title' => '21 websites including Google and Facebook liable to face prosecution for hosting inflammatory contents', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -PTI </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> All 21 websites, including Google and Facebook, summoned earlier by a magisterial court, are liable to face prosecution for being privy to the hosting of inflammatory contents on their webpages, the Delhi High Court was told today. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The counsel for one Vinay Rai, who had moved the trial court for prosecution of various websites, including social networking sites and web search engines, argued before a bench of Justice Suresh Kait that the websites were knowing about contents of their webpages and they cannot shun their criminal liability in the act. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Opposing Google's plea, Rai's counsel Hariharan said the US-based Google Inc and Google India are same and they had the knowledge of the contents because of their means and mechanism to monitor their web pages. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> They cannot seek protection under the Information Technology(IT) Act, he said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> "Protection under section 79 of the IT Act is not available to them as they are doing more than just providing space for posting the material," the counsel said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> "Google Inc has knowledge of existing objectionable material on its webpages and has also the means to check them," he said adding "the foreign company works on the contents and makes advertisement on it." </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Arguing that the websites generate revenue through the advertisement on its cyber space, the lawyer submitted the websites cannot shun their liabilities. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> "They are generating revenue by providing space and posting advertisements on it...," the counsel said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Google Inc has affiliates and subsidiaries all over the world and they provide services on behalf of it, the counsel told the court. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Countering Google's argument that it has nothing to do with the third party contents, the lawyer said "Google is entitled to pre-screen, refuse, review, remove, modify and filter before transmitting the contents." </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Meanwhile, the court dismissed a business man's plea to hear him in the case saying till date no court has passed any order which curtailed the citizens' fundamental rights of freedom of speech and expression. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A lower court had on December 23 issued summons to 21 websites for allegedly committing offences of criminal conspiracy, sale of obscene books and sale of obscene objects to young persons. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Earlier, the Centre had filed a report in the lower court saying there was sufficient material to proceed against the websites for alleged offences of promoting enmity between classes and causing prejudice to national integration. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Out of 21 websites, Google India, Facebook India and Yahoo India have approached the high court for quashing of magisterial court's summons to them. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Google India has sought discharge from the case saying it was not responsible for postings of "obscene, objectionable and defamatory" articles, which cannot be "filtered" or "monitored" either. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 2 February, 2012, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/tech/internet/21-websites-including-google-and-facebook-liable-to-face-prosecution-for-hosting-inflammatory-contents/articlesh', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => '21-websites-including-google-and-facebook-liable-to-face-prosecution-for-hosting-inflammatory-contents-12983', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 12983, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 12863 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 21 websites including Google and Facebook liable to face prosecution for hosting inflammatory contents' $metaKeywords = 'Freedom of Speech,internet,Law and Justice' $metaDesc = ' -PTI All 21 websites, including Google and Facebook, summoned earlier by a magisterial court, are liable to face prosecution for being privy to the hosting of inflammatory contents on their webpages, the Delhi High Court was told today. The counsel for one...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-PTI</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">All 21 websites, including Google and Facebook, summoned earlier by a magisterial court, are liable to face prosecution for being privy to the hosting of inflammatory contents on their webpages, the Delhi High Court was told today. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The counsel for one Vinay Rai, who had moved the trial court for prosecution of various websites, including social networking sites and web search engines, argued before a bench of Justice Suresh Kait that the websites were knowing about contents of their webpages and they cannot shun their criminal liability in the act. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Opposing Google's plea, Rai's counsel Hariharan said the US-based Google Inc and Google India are same and they had the knowledge of the contents because of their means and mechanism to monitor their web pages. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">They cannot seek protection under the Information Technology(IT) Act, he said. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"Protection under section 79 of the IT Act is not available to them as they are doing more than just providing space for posting the material," the counsel said. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"Google Inc has knowledge of existing objectionable material on its webpages and has also the means to check them," he said adding "the foreign company works on the contents and makes advertisement on it." </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Arguing that the websites generate revenue through the advertisement on its cyber space, the lawyer submitted the websites cannot shun their liabilities. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"They are generating revenue by providing space and posting advertisements on it...," the counsel said. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Google Inc has affiliates and subsidiaries all over the world and they provide services on behalf of it, the counsel told the court. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Countering Google's argument that it has nothing to do with the third party contents, the lawyer said "Google is entitled to pre-screen, refuse, review, remove, modify and filter before transmitting the contents." </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Meanwhile, the court dismissed a business man's plea to hear him in the case saying till date no court has passed any order which curtailed the citizens' fundamental rights of freedom of speech and expression. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A lower court had on December 23 issued summons to 21 websites for allegedly committing offences of criminal conspiracy, sale of obscene books and sale of obscene objects to young persons. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Earlier, the Centre had filed a report in the lower court saying there was sufficient material to proceed against the websites for alleged offences of promoting enmity between classes and causing prejudice to national integration. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Out of 21 websites, Google India, Facebook India and Yahoo India have approached the high court for quashing of magisterial court's summons to them. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Google India has sought discharge from the case saying it was not responsible for postings of "obscene, objectionable and defamatory" articles, which cannot be "filtered" or "monitored" either.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
21 websites including Google and Facebook liable to face prosecution for hosting inflammatory contents |
-PTI All 21 websites, including Google and Facebook, summoned earlier by a magisterial court, are liable to face prosecution for being privy to the hosting of inflammatory contents on their webpages, the Delhi High Court was told today. The counsel for one Vinay Rai, who had moved the trial court for prosecution of various websites, including social networking sites and web search engines, argued before a bench of Justice Suresh Kait that the websites were knowing about contents of their webpages and they cannot shun their criminal liability in the act. Opposing Google's plea, Rai's counsel Hariharan said the US-based Google Inc and Google India are same and they had the knowledge of the contents because of their means and mechanism to monitor their web pages. They cannot seek protection under the Information Technology(IT) Act, he said. "Protection under section 79 of the IT Act is not available to them as they are doing more than just providing space for posting the material," the counsel said. "Google Inc has knowledge of existing objectionable material on its webpages and has also the means to check them," he said adding "the foreign company works on the contents and makes advertisement on it." Arguing that the websites generate revenue through the advertisement on its cyber space, the lawyer submitted the websites cannot shun their liabilities. "They are generating revenue by providing space and posting advertisements on it...," the counsel said. Google Inc has affiliates and subsidiaries all over the world and they provide services on behalf of it, the counsel told the court. Countering Google's argument that it has nothing to do with the third party contents, the lawyer said "Google is entitled to pre-screen, refuse, review, remove, modify and filter before transmitting the contents." Meanwhile, the court dismissed a business man's plea to hear him in the case saying till date no court has passed any order which curtailed the citizens' fundamental rights of freedom of speech and expression. A lower court had on December 23 issued summons to 21 websites for allegedly committing offences of criminal conspiracy, sale of obscene books and sale of obscene objects to young persons. Earlier, the Centre had filed a report in the lower court saying there was sufficient material to proceed against the websites for alleged offences of promoting enmity between classes and causing prejudice to national integration. Out of 21 websites, Google India, Facebook India and Yahoo India have approached the high court for quashing of magisterial court's summons to them. Google India has sought discharge from the case saying it was not responsible for postings of "obscene, objectionable and defamatory" articles, which cannot be "filtered" or "monitored" either.
|