Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/2g-scam-does-govt-think-we-are-keeping-businessmen-in-jail-asks-sc-10519/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/2g-scam-does-govt-think-we-are-keeping-businessmen-in-jail-asks-sc-10519/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/2g-scam-does-govt-think-we-are-keeping-businessmen-in-jail-asks-sc-10519/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/2g-scam-does-govt-think-we-are-keeping-businessmen-in-jail-asks-sc-10519/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680da156d2cda-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680da156d2cda-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680da156d2cda-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680da156d2cda-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680da156d2cda-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680da156d2cda-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680da156d2cda-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680da156d2cda-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680da156d2cda-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10408, 'title' => '2G scam: Does govt think we are keeping businessmen in jail, asks SC', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Supreme Court on Wednesday sought to know if the Centre and the CBI were on the same page on the prosecution of the 2G scam accused, given law minister Salman Khurshid's reported statement that investor sentiment would be hurt if courts ordered the arrests of business persons.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A bench of Justices GS Singhvi and HL Dattu said the statement implied that the SC wanted to keep businessmen in jail and sought to know if the minister had indeed made the statement at a time when the CBI was opposing the bail pleas of corporate bigwigs jailed for their alleged role in the case.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The SC demanded a clarification from the government after additional solicitor general Harin Raval resumed arguments for the CBI, opposing the bail pleas of Unitech MD Sanjay Chandra and DB group executive Vinod Goenka. The SC said, &quot;When the court is in the midst of an important hearing in the scam, a newspaper reported a responsible minister's statement hinting as if the courts were interested in keeping businessmen behind bars.&quot;&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Khurshid had said in an interview to a newspaper, &quot;What will affect the functioning of the government is if the other institutions do not understand the kind of political economy we are faced with today; what is needed to encourage growth and investment? If you lock up top businessmen, will investment come?&quot;&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> When Raval said that he represented the CBI, the bench said, &quot;You are representing the CBI and to say the CBI is not part of the central government will be a misnomer. It may be the personal view of the minister. We are in the midst of a serious hearing in the 2G case and we are not interested in anything. You clarify your stand.&quot; The bench also asked Raval about a media report that the CBI may not oppose Kanimozhi's bail plea.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Raval denied the report and said the agency was opposing the bail plea of Chandra and Goenka. He, however, sought time to discuss the issue with the minister and said he would get back to the court with a clarification.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> When the bench sought to know if the public relations department of the government had denied such misleading reports in the media, Raval argued that there was no change of circumstance from the time the apex court had denied bail to Kanimozhi and hence Chandra and Goenka deserved no relief.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But soon, the court referred to the minister's statement that the judiciary must understand the country's political economy and said there had been a spurt in economic crime. &quot;Has the government made enough investment in investigating agencies to equip them to deal with such crime,&quot; it asked.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Attempting to draw away from the rapid questioning over Khurshid's reported statement, Raval cited a March 2003 report of the Committee on Reforms of Criminal Justice System headed by Justice VS Malimath to bolster his opposition to the bail pleas. But he faced another question from the bench: &quot;Has the government accepted the Justice Malimath committee report?&quot; It then asked Raval to get the Centre's response on this issue as well.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Supreme Court's posers could push the government on the back foot. For, Justice Malimath had recommended radical measures, including five-fold increase in the existing judge strength, separation of investigation from law and order duty of police and many other measures which have not yet been implemented by the government. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 13 October, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/2g-scam-does-govt-think-we-are-keeping-businessmen-in-jail-asks-sc/articleshow/10335932.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => '2g-scam-does-govt-think-we-are-keeping-businessmen-in-jail-asks-sc-10519', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10519, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 10408, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 2G scam: Does govt think we are keeping businessmen in jail, asks SC', 'metaKeywords' => 'Law and Justice,Corruption', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Economic Times &nbsp; The Supreme Court on Wednesday sought to know if the Centre and the CBI were on the same page on the prosecution of the 2G scam accused, given law minister Salman Khurshid's reported statement that investor sentiment would...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court on Wednesday sought to know if the Centre and the CBI were on the same page on the prosecution of the 2G scam accused, given law minister Salman Khurshid's reported statement that investor sentiment would be hurt if courts ordered the arrests of business persons.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A bench of Justices GS Singhvi and HL Dattu said the statement implied that the SC wanted to keep businessmen in jail and sought to know if the minister had indeed made the statement at a time when the CBI was opposing the bail pleas of corporate bigwigs jailed for their alleged role in the case.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The SC demanded a clarification from the government after additional solicitor general Harin Raval resumed arguments for the CBI, opposing the bail pleas of Unitech MD Sanjay Chandra and DB group executive Vinod Goenka. The SC said, &quot;When the court is in the midst of an important hearing in the scam, a newspaper reported a responsible minister's statement hinting as if the courts were interested in keeping businessmen behind bars.&quot;&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Khurshid had said in an interview to a newspaper, &quot;What will affect the functioning of the government is if the other institutions do not understand the kind of political economy we are faced with today; what is needed to encourage growth and investment? If you lock up top businessmen, will investment come?&quot;&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">When Raval said that he represented the CBI, the bench said, &quot;You are representing the CBI and to say the CBI is not part of the central government will be a misnomer. It may be the personal view of the minister. We are in the midst of a serious hearing in the 2G case and we are not interested in anything. You clarify your stand.&quot; The bench also asked Raval about a media report that the CBI may not oppose Kanimozhi's bail plea.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Raval denied the report and said the agency was opposing the bail plea of Chandra and Goenka. He, however, sought time to discuss the issue with the minister and said he would get back to the court with a clarification.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">When the bench sought to know if the public relations department of the government had denied such misleading reports in the media, Raval argued that there was no change of circumstance from the time the apex court had denied bail to Kanimozhi and hence Chandra and Goenka deserved no relief.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But soon, the court referred to the minister's statement that the judiciary must understand the country's political economy and said there had been a spurt in economic crime. &quot;Has the government made enough investment in investigating agencies to equip them to deal with such crime,&quot; it asked.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Attempting to draw away from the rapid questioning over Khurshid's reported statement, Raval cited a March 2003 report of the Committee on Reforms of Criminal Justice System headed by Justice VS Malimath to bolster his opposition to the bail pleas. But he faced another question from the bench: &quot;Has the government accepted the Justice Malimath committee report?&quot; It then asked Raval to get the Centre's response on this issue as well.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court's posers could push the government on the back foot. For, Justice Malimath had recommended radical measures, including five-fold increase in the existing judge strength, separation of investigation from law and order duty of police and many other measures which have not yet been implemented by the government.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10408, 'title' => '2G scam: Does govt think we are keeping businessmen in jail, asks SC', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Supreme Court on Wednesday sought to know if the Centre and the CBI were on the same page on the prosecution of the 2G scam accused, given law minister Salman Khurshid's reported statement that investor sentiment would be hurt if courts ordered the arrests of business persons.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A bench of Justices GS Singhvi and HL Dattu said the statement implied that the SC wanted to keep businessmen in jail and sought to know if the minister had indeed made the statement at a time when the CBI was opposing the bail pleas of corporate bigwigs jailed for their alleged role in the case.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The SC demanded a clarification from the government after additional solicitor general Harin Raval resumed arguments for the CBI, opposing the bail pleas of Unitech MD Sanjay Chandra and DB group executive Vinod Goenka. The SC said, &quot;When the court is in the midst of an important hearing in the scam, a newspaper reported a responsible minister's statement hinting as if the courts were interested in keeping businessmen behind bars.&quot;&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Khurshid had said in an interview to a newspaper, &quot;What will affect the functioning of the government is if the other institutions do not understand the kind of political economy we are faced with today; what is needed to encourage growth and investment? If you lock up top businessmen, will investment come?&quot;&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> When Raval said that he represented the CBI, the bench said, &quot;You are representing the CBI and to say the CBI is not part of the central government will be a misnomer. It may be the personal view of the minister. We are in the midst of a serious hearing in the 2G case and we are not interested in anything. You clarify your stand.&quot; The bench also asked Raval about a media report that the CBI may not oppose Kanimozhi's bail plea.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Raval denied the report and said the agency was opposing the bail plea of Chandra and Goenka. He, however, sought time to discuss the issue with the minister and said he would get back to the court with a clarification.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> When the bench sought to know if the public relations department of the government had denied such misleading reports in the media, Raval argued that there was no change of circumstance from the time the apex court had denied bail to Kanimozhi and hence Chandra and Goenka deserved no relief.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But soon, the court referred to the minister's statement that the judiciary must understand the country's political economy and said there had been a spurt in economic crime. &quot;Has the government made enough investment in investigating agencies to equip them to deal with such crime,&quot; it asked.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Attempting to draw away from the rapid questioning over Khurshid's reported statement, Raval cited a March 2003 report of the Committee on Reforms of Criminal Justice System headed by Justice VS Malimath to bolster his opposition to the bail pleas. But he faced another question from the bench: &quot;Has the government accepted the Justice Malimath committee report?&quot; It then asked Raval to get the Centre's response on this issue as well.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Supreme Court's posers could push the government on the back foot. For, Justice Malimath had recommended radical measures, including five-fold increase in the existing judge strength, separation of investigation from law and order duty of police and many other measures which have not yet been implemented by the government. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 13 October, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/2g-scam-does-govt-think-we-are-keeping-businessmen-in-jail-asks-sc/articleshow/10335932.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => '2g-scam-does-govt-think-we-are-keeping-businessmen-in-jail-asks-sc-10519', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10519, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 10408 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 2G scam: Does govt think we are keeping businessmen in jail, asks SC' $metaKeywords = 'Law and Justice,Corruption' $metaDesc = ' -The Economic Times &nbsp; The Supreme Court on Wednesday sought to know if the Centre and the CBI were on the same page on the prosecution of the 2G scam accused, given law minister Salman Khurshid's reported statement that investor sentiment would...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court on Wednesday sought to know if the Centre and the CBI were on the same page on the prosecution of the 2G scam accused, given law minister Salman Khurshid's reported statement that investor sentiment would be hurt if courts ordered the arrests of business persons.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A bench of Justices GS Singhvi and HL Dattu said the statement implied that the SC wanted to keep businessmen in jail and sought to know if the minister had indeed made the statement at a time when the CBI was opposing the bail pleas of corporate bigwigs jailed for their alleged role in the case.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The SC demanded a clarification from the government after additional solicitor general Harin Raval resumed arguments for the CBI, opposing the bail pleas of Unitech MD Sanjay Chandra and DB group executive Vinod Goenka. The SC said, &quot;When the court is in the midst of an important hearing in the scam, a newspaper reported a responsible minister's statement hinting as if the courts were interested in keeping businessmen behind bars.&quot;&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Khurshid had said in an interview to a newspaper, &quot;What will affect the functioning of the government is if the other institutions do not understand the kind of political economy we are faced with today; what is needed to encourage growth and investment? If you lock up top businessmen, will investment come?&quot;&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">When Raval said that he represented the CBI, the bench said, &quot;You are representing the CBI and to say the CBI is not part of the central government will be a misnomer. It may be the personal view of the minister. We are in the midst of a serious hearing in the 2G case and we are not interested in anything. You clarify your stand.&quot; The bench also asked Raval about a media report that the CBI may not oppose Kanimozhi's bail plea.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Raval denied the report and said the agency was opposing the bail plea of Chandra and Goenka. He, however, sought time to discuss the issue with the minister and said he would get back to the court with a clarification.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">When the bench sought to know if the public relations department of the government had denied such misleading reports in the media, Raval argued that there was no change of circumstance from the time the apex court had denied bail to Kanimozhi and hence Chandra and Goenka deserved no relief.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But soon, the court referred to the minister's statement that the judiciary must understand the country's political economy and said there had been a spurt in economic crime. &quot;Has the government made enough investment in investigating agencies to equip them to deal with such crime,&quot; it asked.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Attempting to draw away from the rapid questioning over Khurshid's reported statement, Raval cited a March 2003 report of the Committee on Reforms of Criminal Justice System headed by Justice VS Malimath to bolster his opposition to the bail pleas. But he faced another question from the bench: &quot;Has the government accepted the Justice Malimath committee report?&quot; It then asked Raval to get the Centre's response on this issue as well.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court's posers could push the government on the back foot. For, Justice Malimath had recommended radical measures, including five-fold increase in the existing judge strength, separation of investigation from law and order duty of police and many other measures which have not yet been implemented by the government.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/2g-scam-does-govt-think-we-are-keeping-businessmen-in-jail-asks-sc-10519.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 2G scam: Does govt think we are keeping businessmen in jail, asks SC | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Economic Times The Supreme Court on Wednesday sought to know if the Centre and the CBI were on the same page on the prosecution of the 2G scam accused, given law minister Salman Khurshid's reported statement that investor sentiment would..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>2G scam: Does govt think we are keeping businessmen in jail, asks SC</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court on Wednesday sought to know if the Centre and the CBI were on the same page on the prosecution of the 2G scam accused, given law minister Salman Khurshid's reported statement that investor sentiment would be hurt if courts ordered the arrests of business persons. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A bench of Justices GS Singhvi and HL Dattu said the statement implied that the SC wanted to keep businessmen in jail and sought to know if the minister had indeed made the statement at a time when the CBI was opposing the bail pleas of corporate bigwigs jailed for their alleged role in the case. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The SC demanded a clarification from the government after additional solicitor general Harin Raval resumed arguments for the CBI, opposing the bail pleas of Unitech MD Sanjay Chandra and DB group executive Vinod Goenka. The SC said, "When the court is in the midst of an important hearing in the scam, a newspaper reported a responsible minister's statement hinting as if the courts were interested in keeping businessmen behind bars." </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Khurshid had said in an interview to a newspaper, "What will affect the functioning of the government is if the other institutions do not understand the kind of political economy we are faced with today; what is needed to encourage growth and investment? If you lock up top businessmen, will investment come?" </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">When Raval said that he represented the CBI, the bench said, "You are representing the CBI and to say the CBI is not part of the central government will be a misnomer. It may be the personal view of the minister. We are in the midst of a serious hearing in the 2G case and we are not interested in anything. You clarify your stand." The bench also asked Raval about a media report that the CBI may not oppose Kanimozhi's bail plea. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Raval denied the report and said the agency was opposing the bail plea of Chandra and Goenka. He, however, sought time to discuss the issue with the minister and said he would get back to the court with a clarification. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">When the bench sought to know if the public relations department of the government had denied such misleading reports in the media, Raval argued that there was no change of circumstance from the time the apex court had denied bail to Kanimozhi and hence Chandra and Goenka deserved no relief. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But soon, the court referred to the minister's statement that the judiciary must understand the country's political economy and said there had been a spurt in economic crime. "Has the government made enough investment in investigating agencies to equip them to deal with such crime," it asked. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Attempting to draw away from the rapid questioning over Khurshid's reported statement, Raval cited a March 2003 report of the Committee on Reforms of Criminal Justice System headed by Justice VS Malimath to bolster his opposition to the bail pleas. But he faced another question from the bench: "Has the government accepted the Justice Malimath committee report?" It then asked Raval to get the Centre's response on this issue as well. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court's posers could push the government on the back foot. For, Justice Malimath had recommended radical measures, including five-fold increase in the existing judge strength, separation of investigation from law and order duty of police and many other measures which have not yet been implemented by the government.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680da156d2cda-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680da156d2cda-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680da156d2cda-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680da156d2cda-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680da156d2cda-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680da156d2cda-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680da156d2cda-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680da156d2cda-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680da156d2cda-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10408, 'title' => '2G scam: Does govt think we are keeping businessmen in jail, asks SC', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Supreme Court on Wednesday sought to know if the Centre and the CBI were on the same page on the prosecution of the 2G scam accused, given law minister Salman Khurshid's reported statement that investor sentiment would be hurt if courts ordered the arrests of business persons.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A bench of Justices GS Singhvi and HL Dattu said the statement implied that the SC wanted to keep businessmen in jail and sought to know if the minister had indeed made the statement at a time when the CBI was opposing the bail pleas of corporate bigwigs jailed for their alleged role in the case.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The SC demanded a clarification from the government after additional solicitor general Harin Raval resumed arguments for the CBI, opposing the bail pleas of Unitech MD Sanjay Chandra and DB group executive Vinod Goenka. The SC said, &quot;When the court is in the midst of an important hearing in the scam, a newspaper reported a responsible minister's statement hinting as if the courts were interested in keeping businessmen behind bars.&quot;&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Khurshid had said in an interview to a newspaper, &quot;What will affect the functioning of the government is if the other institutions do not understand the kind of political economy we are faced with today; what is needed to encourage growth and investment? If you lock up top businessmen, will investment come?&quot;&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> When Raval said that he represented the CBI, the bench said, &quot;You are representing the CBI and to say the CBI is not part of the central government will be a misnomer. It may be the personal view of the minister. We are in the midst of a serious hearing in the 2G case and we are not interested in anything. You clarify your stand.&quot; The bench also asked Raval about a media report that the CBI may not oppose Kanimozhi's bail plea.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Raval denied the report and said the agency was opposing the bail plea of Chandra and Goenka. He, however, sought time to discuss the issue with the minister and said he would get back to the court with a clarification.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> When the bench sought to know if the public relations department of the government had denied such misleading reports in the media, Raval argued that there was no change of circumstance from the time the apex court had denied bail to Kanimozhi and hence Chandra and Goenka deserved no relief.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But soon, the court referred to the minister's statement that the judiciary must understand the country's political economy and said there had been a spurt in economic crime. &quot;Has the government made enough investment in investigating agencies to equip them to deal with such crime,&quot; it asked.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Attempting to draw away from the rapid questioning over Khurshid's reported statement, Raval cited a March 2003 report of the Committee on Reforms of Criminal Justice System headed by Justice VS Malimath to bolster his opposition to the bail pleas. But he faced another question from the bench: &quot;Has the government accepted the Justice Malimath committee report?&quot; It then asked Raval to get the Centre's response on this issue as well.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Supreme Court's posers could push the government on the back foot. For, Justice Malimath had recommended radical measures, including five-fold increase in the existing judge strength, separation of investigation from law and order duty of police and many other measures which have not yet been implemented by the government. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 13 October, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/2g-scam-does-govt-think-we-are-keeping-businessmen-in-jail-asks-sc/articleshow/10335932.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => '2g-scam-does-govt-think-we-are-keeping-businessmen-in-jail-asks-sc-10519', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10519, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 10408, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 2G scam: Does govt think we are keeping businessmen in jail, asks SC', 'metaKeywords' => 'Law and Justice,Corruption', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Economic Times &nbsp; The Supreme Court on Wednesday sought to know if the Centre and the CBI were on the same page on the prosecution of the 2G scam accused, given law minister Salman Khurshid's reported statement that investor sentiment would...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court on Wednesday sought to know if the Centre and the CBI were on the same page on the prosecution of the 2G scam accused, given law minister Salman Khurshid's reported statement that investor sentiment would be hurt if courts ordered the arrests of business persons.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A bench of Justices GS Singhvi and HL Dattu said the statement implied that the SC wanted to keep businessmen in jail and sought to know if the minister had indeed made the statement at a time when the CBI was opposing the bail pleas of corporate bigwigs jailed for their alleged role in the case.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The SC demanded a clarification from the government after additional solicitor general Harin Raval resumed arguments for the CBI, opposing the bail pleas of Unitech MD Sanjay Chandra and DB group executive Vinod Goenka. The SC said, &quot;When the court is in the midst of an important hearing in the scam, a newspaper reported a responsible minister's statement hinting as if the courts were interested in keeping businessmen behind bars.&quot;&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Khurshid had said in an interview to a newspaper, &quot;What will affect the functioning of the government is if the other institutions do not understand the kind of political economy we are faced with today; what is needed to encourage growth and investment? If you lock up top businessmen, will investment come?&quot;&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">When Raval said that he represented the CBI, the bench said, &quot;You are representing the CBI and to say the CBI is not part of the central government will be a misnomer. It may be the personal view of the minister. We are in the midst of a serious hearing in the 2G case and we are not interested in anything. You clarify your stand.&quot; The bench also asked Raval about a media report that the CBI may not oppose Kanimozhi's bail plea.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Raval denied the report and said the agency was opposing the bail plea of Chandra and Goenka. He, however, sought time to discuss the issue with the minister and said he would get back to the court with a clarification.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">When the bench sought to know if the public relations department of the government had denied such misleading reports in the media, Raval argued that there was no change of circumstance from the time the apex court had denied bail to Kanimozhi and hence Chandra and Goenka deserved no relief.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But soon, the court referred to the minister's statement that the judiciary must understand the country's political economy and said there had been a spurt in economic crime. &quot;Has the government made enough investment in investigating agencies to equip them to deal with such crime,&quot; it asked.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Attempting to draw away from the rapid questioning over Khurshid's reported statement, Raval cited a March 2003 report of the Committee on Reforms of Criminal Justice System headed by Justice VS Malimath to bolster his opposition to the bail pleas. But he faced another question from the bench: &quot;Has the government accepted the Justice Malimath committee report?&quot; It then asked Raval to get the Centre's response on this issue as well.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court's posers could push the government on the back foot. For, Justice Malimath had recommended radical measures, including five-fold increase in the existing judge strength, separation of investigation from law and order duty of police and many other measures which have not yet been implemented by the government.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10408, 'title' => '2G scam: Does govt think we are keeping businessmen in jail, asks SC', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Supreme Court on Wednesday sought to know if the Centre and the CBI were on the same page on the prosecution of the 2G scam accused, given law minister Salman Khurshid's reported statement that investor sentiment would be hurt if courts ordered the arrests of business persons.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A bench of Justices GS Singhvi and HL Dattu said the statement implied that the SC wanted to keep businessmen in jail and sought to know if the minister had indeed made the statement at a time when the CBI was opposing the bail pleas of corporate bigwigs jailed for their alleged role in the case.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The SC demanded a clarification from the government after additional solicitor general Harin Raval resumed arguments for the CBI, opposing the bail pleas of Unitech MD Sanjay Chandra and DB group executive Vinod Goenka. The SC said, &quot;When the court is in the midst of an important hearing in the scam, a newspaper reported a responsible minister's statement hinting as if the courts were interested in keeping businessmen behind bars.&quot;&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Khurshid had said in an interview to a newspaper, &quot;What will affect the functioning of the government is if the other institutions do not understand the kind of political economy we are faced with today; what is needed to encourage growth and investment? If you lock up top businessmen, will investment come?&quot;&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> When Raval said that he represented the CBI, the bench said, &quot;You are representing the CBI and to say the CBI is not part of the central government will be a misnomer. It may be the personal view of the minister. We are in the midst of a serious hearing in the 2G case and we are not interested in anything. You clarify your stand.&quot; The bench also asked Raval about a media report that the CBI may not oppose Kanimozhi's bail plea.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Raval denied the report and said the agency was opposing the bail plea of Chandra and Goenka. He, however, sought time to discuss the issue with the minister and said he would get back to the court with a clarification.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> When the bench sought to know if the public relations department of the government had denied such misleading reports in the media, Raval argued that there was no change of circumstance from the time the apex court had denied bail to Kanimozhi and hence Chandra and Goenka deserved no relief.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But soon, the court referred to the minister's statement that the judiciary must understand the country's political economy and said there had been a spurt in economic crime. &quot;Has the government made enough investment in investigating agencies to equip them to deal with such crime,&quot; it asked.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Attempting to draw away from the rapid questioning over Khurshid's reported statement, Raval cited a March 2003 report of the Committee on Reforms of Criminal Justice System headed by Justice VS Malimath to bolster his opposition to the bail pleas. But he faced another question from the bench: &quot;Has the government accepted the Justice Malimath committee report?&quot; It then asked Raval to get the Centre's response on this issue as well.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Supreme Court's posers could push the government on the back foot. For, Justice Malimath had recommended radical measures, including five-fold increase in the existing judge strength, separation of investigation from law and order duty of police and many other measures which have not yet been implemented by the government. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 13 October, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/2g-scam-does-govt-think-we-are-keeping-businessmen-in-jail-asks-sc/articleshow/10335932.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => '2g-scam-does-govt-think-we-are-keeping-businessmen-in-jail-asks-sc-10519', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10519, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 10408 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 2G scam: Does govt think we are keeping businessmen in jail, asks SC' $metaKeywords = 'Law and Justice,Corruption' $metaDesc = ' -The Economic Times &nbsp; The Supreme Court on Wednesday sought to know if the Centre and the CBI were on the same page on the prosecution of the 2G scam accused, given law minister Salman Khurshid's reported statement that investor sentiment would...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court on Wednesday sought to know if the Centre and the CBI were on the same page on the prosecution of the 2G scam accused, given law minister Salman Khurshid's reported statement that investor sentiment would be hurt if courts ordered the arrests of business persons.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A bench of Justices GS Singhvi and HL Dattu said the statement implied that the SC wanted to keep businessmen in jail and sought to know if the minister had indeed made the statement at a time when the CBI was opposing the bail pleas of corporate bigwigs jailed for their alleged role in the case.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The SC demanded a clarification from the government after additional solicitor general Harin Raval resumed arguments for the CBI, opposing the bail pleas of Unitech MD Sanjay Chandra and DB group executive Vinod Goenka. The SC said, &quot;When the court is in the midst of an important hearing in the scam, a newspaper reported a responsible minister's statement hinting as if the courts were interested in keeping businessmen behind bars.&quot;&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Khurshid had said in an interview to a newspaper, &quot;What will affect the functioning of the government is if the other institutions do not understand the kind of political economy we are faced with today; what is needed to encourage growth and investment? If you lock up top businessmen, will investment come?&quot;&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">When Raval said that he represented the CBI, the bench said, &quot;You are representing the CBI and to say the CBI is not part of the central government will be a misnomer. It may be the personal view of the minister. We are in the midst of a serious hearing in the 2G case and we are not interested in anything. You clarify your stand.&quot; The bench also asked Raval about a media report that the CBI may not oppose Kanimozhi's bail plea.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Raval denied the report and said the agency was opposing the bail plea of Chandra and Goenka. He, however, sought time to discuss the issue with the minister and said he would get back to the court with a clarification.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">When the bench sought to know if the public relations department of the government had denied such misleading reports in the media, Raval argued that there was no change of circumstance from the time the apex court had denied bail to Kanimozhi and hence Chandra and Goenka deserved no relief.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But soon, the court referred to the minister's statement that the judiciary must understand the country's political economy and said there had been a spurt in economic crime. &quot;Has the government made enough investment in investigating agencies to equip them to deal with such crime,&quot; it asked.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Attempting to draw away from the rapid questioning over Khurshid's reported statement, Raval cited a March 2003 report of the Committee on Reforms of Criminal Justice System headed by Justice VS Malimath to bolster his opposition to the bail pleas. But he faced another question from the bench: &quot;Has the government accepted the Justice Malimath committee report?&quot; It then asked Raval to get the Centre's response on this issue as well.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court's posers could push the government on the back foot. For, Justice Malimath had recommended radical measures, including five-fold increase in the existing judge strength, separation of investigation from law and order duty of police and many other measures which have not yet been implemented by the government.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/2g-scam-does-govt-think-we-are-keeping-businessmen-in-jail-asks-sc-10519.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 2G scam: Does govt think we are keeping businessmen in jail, asks SC | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Economic Times The Supreme Court on Wednesday sought to know if the Centre and the CBI were on the same page on the prosecution of the 2G scam accused, given law minister Salman Khurshid's reported statement that investor sentiment would..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>2G scam: Does govt think we are keeping businessmen in jail, asks SC</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court on Wednesday sought to know if the Centre and the CBI were on the same page on the prosecution of the 2G scam accused, given law minister Salman Khurshid's reported statement that investor sentiment would be hurt if courts ordered the arrests of business persons. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A bench of Justices GS Singhvi and HL Dattu said the statement implied that the SC wanted to keep businessmen in jail and sought to know if the minister had indeed made the statement at a time when the CBI was opposing the bail pleas of corporate bigwigs jailed for their alleged role in the case. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The SC demanded a clarification from the government after additional solicitor general Harin Raval resumed arguments for the CBI, opposing the bail pleas of Unitech MD Sanjay Chandra and DB group executive Vinod Goenka. The SC said, "When the court is in the midst of an important hearing in the scam, a newspaper reported a responsible minister's statement hinting as if the courts were interested in keeping businessmen behind bars." </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Khurshid had said in an interview to a newspaper, "What will affect the functioning of the government is if the other institutions do not understand the kind of political economy we are faced with today; what is needed to encourage growth and investment? If you lock up top businessmen, will investment come?" </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">When Raval said that he represented the CBI, the bench said, "You are representing the CBI and to say the CBI is not part of the central government will be a misnomer. It may be the personal view of the minister. We are in the midst of a serious hearing in the 2G case and we are not interested in anything. You clarify your stand." The bench also asked Raval about a media report that the CBI may not oppose Kanimozhi's bail plea. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Raval denied the report and said the agency was opposing the bail plea of Chandra and Goenka. He, however, sought time to discuss the issue with the minister and said he would get back to the court with a clarification. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">When the bench sought to know if the public relations department of the government had denied such misleading reports in the media, Raval argued that there was no change of circumstance from the time the apex court had denied bail to Kanimozhi and hence Chandra and Goenka deserved no relief. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But soon, the court referred to the minister's statement that the judiciary must understand the country's political economy and said there had been a spurt in economic crime. "Has the government made enough investment in investigating agencies to equip them to deal with such crime," it asked. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Attempting to draw away from the rapid questioning over Khurshid's reported statement, Raval cited a March 2003 report of the Committee on Reforms of Criminal Justice System headed by Justice VS Malimath to bolster his opposition to the bail pleas. But he faced another question from the bench: "Has the government accepted the Justice Malimath committee report?" It then asked Raval to get the Centre's response on this issue as well. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court's posers could push the government on the back foot. For, Justice Malimath had recommended radical measures, including five-fold increase in the existing judge strength, separation of investigation from law and order duty of police and many other measures which have not yet been implemented by the government.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680da156d2cda-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680da156d2cda-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680da156d2cda-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680da156d2cda-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680da156d2cda-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680da156d2cda-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680da156d2cda-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680da156d2cda-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680da156d2cda-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10408, 'title' => '2G scam: Does govt think we are keeping businessmen in jail, asks SC', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Supreme Court on Wednesday sought to know if the Centre and the CBI were on the same page on the prosecution of the 2G scam accused, given law minister Salman Khurshid's reported statement that investor sentiment would be hurt if courts ordered the arrests of business persons.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A bench of Justices GS Singhvi and HL Dattu said the statement implied that the SC wanted to keep businessmen in jail and sought to know if the minister had indeed made the statement at a time when the CBI was opposing the bail pleas of corporate bigwigs jailed for their alleged role in the case.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The SC demanded a clarification from the government after additional solicitor general Harin Raval resumed arguments for the CBI, opposing the bail pleas of Unitech MD Sanjay Chandra and DB group executive Vinod Goenka. The SC said, &quot;When the court is in the midst of an important hearing in the scam, a newspaper reported a responsible minister's statement hinting as if the courts were interested in keeping businessmen behind bars.&quot;&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Khurshid had said in an interview to a newspaper, &quot;What will affect the functioning of the government is if the other institutions do not understand the kind of political economy we are faced with today; what is needed to encourage growth and investment? If you lock up top businessmen, will investment come?&quot;&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> When Raval said that he represented the CBI, the bench said, &quot;You are representing the CBI and to say the CBI is not part of the central government will be a misnomer. It may be the personal view of the minister. We are in the midst of a serious hearing in the 2G case and we are not interested in anything. You clarify your stand.&quot; The bench also asked Raval about a media report that the CBI may not oppose Kanimozhi's bail plea.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Raval denied the report and said the agency was opposing the bail plea of Chandra and Goenka. He, however, sought time to discuss the issue with the minister and said he would get back to the court with a clarification.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> When the bench sought to know if the public relations department of the government had denied such misleading reports in the media, Raval argued that there was no change of circumstance from the time the apex court had denied bail to Kanimozhi and hence Chandra and Goenka deserved no relief.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But soon, the court referred to the minister's statement that the judiciary must understand the country's political economy and said there had been a spurt in economic crime. &quot;Has the government made enough investment in investigating agencies to equip them to deal with such crime,&quot; it asked.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Attempting to draw away from the rapid questioning over Khurshid's reported statement, Raval cited a March 2003 report of the Committee on Reforms of Criminal Justice System headed by Justice VS Malimath to bolster his opposition to the bail pleas. But he faced another question from the bench: &quot;Has the government accepted the Justice Malimath committee report?&quot; It then asked Raval to get the Centre's response on this issue as well.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Supreme Court's posers could push the government on the back foot. For, Justice Malimath had recommended radical measures, including five-fold increase in the existing judge strength, separation of investigation from law and order duty of police and many other measures which have not yet been implemented by the government. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 13 October, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/2g-scam-does-govt-think-we-are-keeping-businessmen-in-jail-asks-sc/articleshow/10335932.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => '2g-scam-does-govt-think-we-are-keeping-businessmen-in-jail-asks-sc-10519', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10519, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 10408, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 2G scam: Does govt think we are keeping businessmen in jail, asks SC', 'metaKeywords' => 'Law and Justice,Corruption', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Economic Times &nbsp; The Supreme Court on Wednesday sought to know if the Centre and the CBI were on the same page on the prosecution of the 2G scam accused, given law minister Salman Khurshid's reported statement that investor sentiment would...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court on Wednesday sought to know if the Centre and the CBI were on the same page on the prosecution of the 2G scam accused, given law minister Salman Khurshid's reported statement that investor sentiment would be hurt if courts ordered the arrests of business persons.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A bench of Justices GS Singhvi and HL Dattu said the statement implied that the SC wanted to keep businessmen in jail and sought to know if the minister had indeed made the statement at a time when the CBI was opposing the bail pleas of corporate bigwigs jailed for their alleged role in the case.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The SC demanded a clarification from the government after additional solicitor general Harin Raval resumed arguments for the CBI, opposing the bail pleas of Unitech MD Sanjay Chandra and DB group executive Vinod Goenka. The SC said, &quot;When the court is in the midst of an important hearing in the scam, a newspaper reported a responsible minister's statement hinting as if the courts were interested in keeping businessmen behind bars.&quot;&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Khurshid had said in an interview to a newspaper, &quot;What will affect the functioning of the government is if the other institutions do not understand the kind of political economy we are faced with today; what is needed to encourage growth and investment? If you lock up top businessmen, will investment come?&quot;&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">When Raval said that he represented the CBI, the bench said, &quot;You are representing the CBI and to say the CBI is not part of the central government will be a misnomer. It may be the personal view of the minister. We are in the midst of a serious hearing in the 2G case and we are not interested in anything. You clarify your stand.&quot; The bench also asked Raval about a media report that the CBI may not oppose Kanimozhi's bail plea.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Raval denied the report and said the agency was opposing the bail plea of Chandra and Goenka. He, however, sought time to discuss the issue with the minister and said he would get back to the court with a clarification.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">When the bench sought to know if the public relations department of the government had denied such misleading reports in the media, Raval argued that there was no change of circumstance from the time the apex court had denied bail to Kanimozhi and hence Chandra and Goenka deserved no relief.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But soon, the court referred to the minister's statement that the judiciary must understand the country's political economy and said there had been a spurt in economic crime. &quot;Has the government made enough investment in investigating agencies to equip them to deal with such crime,&quot; it asked.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Attempting to draw away from the rapid questioning over Khurshid's reported statement, Raval cited a March 2003 report of the Committee on Reforms of Criminal Justice System headed by Justice VS Malimath to bolster his opposition to the bail pleas. But he faced another question from the bench: &quot;Has the government accepted the Justice Malimath committee report?&quot; It then asked Raval to get the Centre's response on this issue as well.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court's posers could push the government on the back foot. For, Justice Malimath had recommended radical measures, including five-fold increase in the existing judge strength, separation of investigation from law and order duty of police and many other measures which have not yet been implemented by the government.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10408, 'title' => '2G scam: Does govt think we are keeping businessmen in jail, asks SC', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Supreme Court on Wednesday sought to know if the Centre and the CBI were on the same page on the prosecution of the 2G scam accused, given law minister Salman Khurshid's reported statement that investor sentiment would be hurt if courts ordered the arrests of business persons.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A bench of Justices GS Singhvi and HL Dattu said the statement implied that the SC wanted to keep businessmen in jail and sought to know if the minister had indeed made the statement at a time when the CBI was opposing the bail pleas of corporate bigwigs jailed for their alleged role in the case.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The SC demanded a clarification from the government after additional solicitor general Harin Raval resumed arguments for the CBI, opposing the bail pleas of Unitech MD Sanjay Chandra and DB group executive Vinod Goenka. The SC said, &quot;When the court is in the midst of an important hearing in the scam, a newspaper reported a responsible minister's statement hinting as if the courts were interested in keeping businessmen behind bars.&quot;&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Khurshid had said in an interview to a newspaper, &quot;What will affect the functioning of the government is if the other institutions do not understand the kind of political economy we are faced with today; what is needed to encourage growth and investment? If you lock up top businessmen, will investment come?&quot;&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> When Raval said that he represented the CBI, the bench said, &quot;You are representing the CBI and to say the CBI is not part of the central government will be a misnomer. It may be the personal view of the minister. We are in the midst of a serious hearing in the 2G case and we are not interested in anything. You clarify your stand.&quot; The bench also asked Raval about a media report that the CBI may not oppose Kanimozhi's bail plea.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Raval denied the report and said the agency was opposing the bail plea of Chandra and Goenka. He, however, sought time to discuss the issue with the minister and said he would get back to the court with a clarification.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> When the bench sought to know if the public relations department of the government had denied such misleading reports in the media, Raval argued that there was no change of circumstance from the time the apex court had denied bail to Kanimozhi and hence Chandra and Goenka deserved no relief.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But soon, the court referred to the minister's statement that the judiciary must understand the country's political economy and said there had been a spurt in economic crime. &quot;Has the government made enough investment in investigating agencies to equip them to deal with such crime,&quot; it asked.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Attempting to draw away from the rapid questioning over Khurshid's reported statement, Raval cited a March 2003 report of the Committee on Reforms of Criminal Justice System headed by Justice VS Malimath to bolster his opposition to the bail pleas. But he faced another question from the bench: &quot;Has the government accepted the Justice Malimath committee report?&quot; It then asked Raval to get the Centre's response on this issue as well.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Supreme Court's posers could push the government on the back foot. For, Justice Malimath had recommended radical measures, including five-fold increase in the existing judge strength, separation of investigation from law and order duty of police and many other measures which have not yet been implemented by the government. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 13 October, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/2g-scam-does-govt-think-we-are-keeping-businessmen-in-jail-asks-sc/articleshow/10335932.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => '2g-scam-does-govt-think-we-are-keeping-businessmen-in-jail-asks-sc-10519', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10519, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 10408 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 2G scam: Does govt think we are keeping businessmen in jail, asks SC' $metaKeywords = 'Law and Justice,Corruption' $metaDesc = ' -The Economic Times &nbsp; The Supreme Court on Wednesday sought to know if the Centre and the CBI were on the same page on the prosecution of the 2G scam accused, given law minister Salman Khurshid's reported statement that investor sentiment would...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court on Wednesday sought to know if the Centre and the CBI were on the same page on the prosecution of the 2G scam accused, given law minister Salman Khurshid's reported statement that investor sentiment would be hurt if courts ordered the arrests of business persons.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A bench of Justices GS Singhvi and HL Dattu said the statement implied that the SC wanted to keep businessmen in jail and sought to know if the minister had indeed made the statement at a time when the CBI was opposing the bail pleas of corporate bigwigs jailed for their alleged role in the case.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The SC demanded a clarification from the government after additional solicitor general Harin Raval resumed arguments for the CBI, opposing the bail pleas of Unitech MD Sanjay Chandra and DB group executive Vinod Goenka. The SC said, &quot;When the court is in the midst of an important hearing in the scam, a newspaper reported a responsible minister's statement hinting as if the courts were interested in keeping businessmen behind bars.&quot;&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Khurshid had said in an interview to a newspaper, &quot;What will affect the functioning of the government is if the other institutions do not understand the kind of political economy we are faced with today; what is needed to encourage growth and investment? If you lock up top businessmen, will investment come?&quot;&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">When Raval said that he represented the CBI, the bench said, &quot;You are representing the CBI and to say the CBI is not part of the central government will be a misnomer. It may be the personal view of the minister. We are in the midst of a serious hearing in the 2G case and we are not interested in anything. You clarify your stand.&quot; The bench also asked Raval about a media report that the CBI may not oppose Kanimozhi's bail plea.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Raval denied the report and said the agency was opposing the bail plea of Chandra and Goenka. He, however, sought time to discuss the issue with the minister and said he would get back to the court with a clarification.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">When the bench sought to know if the public relations department of the government had denied such misleading reports in the media, Raval argued that there was no change of circumstance from the time the apex court had denied bail to Kanimozhi and hence Chandra and Goenka deserved no relief.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But soon, the court referred to the minister's statement that the judiciary must understand the country's political economy and said there had been a spurt in economic crime. &quot;Has the government made enough investment in investigating agencies to equip them to deal with such crime,&quot; it asked.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Attempting to draw away from the rapid questioning over Khurshid's reported statement, Raval cited a March 2003 report of the Committee on Reforms of Criminal Justice System headed by Justice VS Malimath to bolster his opposition to the bail pleas. But he faced another question from the bench: &quot;Has the government accepted the Justice Malimath committee report?&quot; It then asked Raval to get the Centre's response on this issue as well.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court's posers could push the government on the back foot. For, Justice Malimath had recommended radical measures, including five-fold increase in the existing judge strength, separation of investigation from law and order duty of police and many other measures which have not yet been implemented by the government.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/2g-scam-does-govt-think-we-are-keeping-businessmen-in-jail-asks-sc-10519.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 2G scam: Does govt think we are keeping businessmen in jail, asks SC | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Economic Times The Supreme Court on Wednesday sought to know if the Centre and the CBI were on the same page on the prosecution of the 2G scam accused, given law minister Salman Khurshid's reported statement that investor sentiment would..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>2G scam: Does govt think we are keeping businessmen in jail, asks SC</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court on Wednesday sought to know if the Centre and the CBI were on the same page on the prosecution of the 2G scam accused, given law minister Salman Khurshid's reported statement that investor sentiment would be hurt if courts ordered the arrests of business persons. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A bench of Justices GS Singhvi and HL Dattu said the statement implied that the SC wanted to keep businessmen in jail and sought to know if the minister had indeed made the statement at a time when the CBI was opposing the bail pleas of corporate bigwigs jailed for their alleged role in the case. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The SC demanded a clarification from the government after additional solicitor general Harin Raval resumed arguments for the CBI, opposing the bail pleas of Unitech MD Sanjay Chandra and DB group executive Vinod Goenka. The SC said, "When the court is in the midst of an important hearing in the scam, a newspaper reported a responsible minister's statement hinting as if the courts were interested in keeping businessmen behind bars." </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Khurshid had said in an interview to a newspaper, "What will affect the functioning of the government is if the other institutions do not understand the kind of political economy we are faced with today; what is needed to encourage growth and investment? If you lock up top businessmen, will investment come?" </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">When Raval said that he represented the CBI, the bench said, "You are representing the CBI and to say the CBI is not part of the central government will be a misnomer. It may be the personal view of the minister. We are in the midst of a serious hearing in the 2G case and we are not interested in anything. You clarify your stand." The bench also asked Raval about a media report that the CBI may not oppose Kanimozhi's bail plea. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Raval denied the report and said the agency was opposing the bail plea of Chandra and Goenka. He, however, sought time to discuss the issue with the minister and said he would get back to the court with a clarification. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">When the bench sought to know if the public relations department of the government had denied such misleading reports in the media, Raval argued that there was no change of circumstance from the time the apex court had denied bail to Kanimozhi and hence Chandra and Goenka deserved no relief. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But soon, the court referred to the minister's statement that the judiciary must understand the country's political economy and said there had been a spurt in economic crime. "Has the government made enough investment in investigating agencies to equip them to deal with such crime," it asked. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Attempting to draw away from the rapid questioning over Khurshid's reported statement, Raval cited a March 2003 report of the Committee on Reforms of Criminal Justice System headed by Justice VS Malimath to bolster his opposition to the bail pleas. But he faced another question from the bench: "Has the government accepted the Justice Malimath committee report?" It then asked Raval to get the Centre's response on this issue as well. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court's posers could push the government on the back foot. For, Justice Malimath had recommended radical measures, including five-fold increase in the existing judge strength, separation of investigation from law and order duty of police and many other measures which have not yet been implemented by the government.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10408, 'title' => '2G scam: Does govt think we are keeping businessmen in jail, asks SC', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Supreme Court on Wednesday sought to know if the Centre and the CBI were on the same page on the prosecution of the 2G scam accused, given law minister Salman Khurshid's reported statement that investor sentiment would be hurt if courts ordered the arrests of business persons. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A bench of Justices GS Singhvi and HL Dattu said the statement implied that the SC wanted to keep businessmen in jail and sought to know if the minister had indeed made the statement at a time when the CBI was opposing the bail pleas of corporate bigwigs jailed for their alleged role in the case. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The SC demanded a clarification from the government after additional solicitor general Harin Raval resumed arguments for the CBI, opposing the bail pleas of Unitech MD Sanjay Chandra and DB group executive Vinod Goenka. The SC said, "When the court is in the midst of an important hearing in the scam, a newspaper reported a responsible minister's statement hinting as if the courts were interested in keeping businessmen behind bars." </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Khurshid had said in an interview to a newspaper, "What will affect the functioning of the government is if the other institutions do not understand the kind of political economy we are faced with today; what is needed to encourage growth and investment? If you lock up top businessmen, will investment come?" </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> When Raval said that he represented the CBI, the bench said, "You are representing the CBI and to say the CBI is not part of the central government will be a misnomer. It may be the personal view of the minister. We are in the midst of a serious hearing in the 2G case and we are not interested in anything. You clarify your stand." The bench also asked Raval about a media report that the CBI may not oppose Kanimozhi's bail plea. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Raval denied the report and said the agency was opposing the bail plea of Chandra and Goenka. He, however, sought time to discuss the issue with the minister and said he would get back to the court with a clarification. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> When the bench sought to know if the public relations department of the government had denied such misleading reports in the media, Raval argued that there was no change of circumstance from the time the apex court had denied bail to Kanimozhi and hence Chandra and Goenka deserved no relief. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But soon, the court referred to the minister's statement that the judiciary must understand the country's political economy and said there had been a spurt in economic crime. "Has the government made enough investment in investigating agencies to equip them to deal with such crime," it asked. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Attempting to draw away from the rapid questioning over Khurshid's reported statement, Raval cited a March 2003 report of the Committee on Reforms of Criminal Justice System headed by Justice VS Malimath to bolster his opposition to the bail pleas. But he faced another question from the bench: "Has the government accepted the Justice Malimath committee report?" It then asked Raval to get the Centre's response on this issue as well. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Supreme Court's posers could push the government on the back foot. For, Justice Malimath had recommended radical measures, including five-fold increase in the existing judge strength, separation of investigation from law and order duty of police and many other measures which have not yet been implemented by the government. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 13 October, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/2g-scam-does-govt-think-we-are-keeping-businessmen-in-jail-asks-sc/articleshow/10335932.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => '2g-scam-does-govt-think-we-are-keeping-businessmen-in-jail-asks-sc-10519', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10519, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 10408, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 2G scam: Does govt think we are keeping businessmen in jail, asks SC', 'metaKeywords' => 'Law and Justice,Corruption', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Economic Times The Supreme Court on Wednesday sought to know if the Centre and the CBI were on the same page on the prosecution of the 2G scam accused, given law minister Salman Khurshid's reported statement that investor sentiment would...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court on Wednesday sought to know if the Centre and the CBI were on the same page on the prosecution of the 2G scam accused, given law minister Salman Khurshid's reported statement that investor sentiment would be hurt if courts ordered the arrests of business persons. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A bench of Justices GS Singhvi and HL Dattu said the statement implied that the SC wanted to keep businessmen in jail and sought to know if the minister had indeed made the statement at a time when the CBI was opposing the bail pleas of corporate bigwigs jailed for their alleged role in the case. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The SC demanded a clarification from the government after additional solicitor general Harin Raval resumed arguments for the CBI, opposing the bail pleas of Unitech MD Sanjay Chandra and DB group executive Vinod Goenka. The SC said, "When the court is in the midst of an important hearing in the scam, a newspaper reported a responsible minister's statement hinting as if the courts were interested in keeping businessmen behind bars." </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Khurshid had said in an interview to a newspaper, "What will affect the functioning of the government is if the other institutions do not understand the kind of political economy we are faced with today; what is needed to encourage growth and investment? If you lock up top businessmen, will investment come?" </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">When Raval said that he represented the CBI, the bench said, "You are representing the CBI and to say the CBI is not part of the central government will be a misnomer. It may be the personal view of the minister. We are in the midst of a serious hearing in the 2G case and we are not interested in anything. You clarify your stand." The bench also asked Raval about a media report that the CBI may not oppose Kanimozhi's bail plea. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Raval denied the report and said the agency was opposing the bail plea of Chandra and Goenka. He, however, sought time to discuss the issue with the minister and said he would get back to the court with a clarification. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">When the bench sought to know if the public relations department of the government had denied such misleading reports in the media, Raval argued that there was no change of circumstance from the time the apex court had denied bail to Kanimozhi and hence Chandra and Goenka deserved no relief. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But soon, the court referred to the minister's statement that the judiciary must understand the country's political economy and said there had been a spurt in economic crime. "Has the government made enough investment in investigating agencies to equip them to deal with such crime," it asked. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Attempting to draw away from the rapid questioning over Khurshid's reported statement, Raval cited a March 2003 report of the Committee on Reforms of Criminal Justice System headed by Justice VS Malimath to bolster his opposition to the bail pleas. But he faced another question from the bench: "Has the government accepted the Justice Malimath committee report?" It then asked Raval to get the Centre's response on this issue as well. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court's posers could push the government on the back foot. For, Justice Malimath had recommended radical measures, including five-fold increase in the existing judge strength, separation of investigation from law and order duty of police and many other measures which have not yet been implemented by the government.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10408, 'title' => '2G scam: Does govt think we are keeping businessmen in jail, asks SC', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Supreme Court on Wednesday sought to know if the Centre and the CBI were on the same page on the prosecution of the 2G scam accused, given law minister Salman Khurshid's reported statement that investor sentiment would be hurt if courts ordered the arrests of business persons. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> A bench of Justices GS Singhvi and HL Dattu said the statement implied that the SC wanted to keep businessmen in jail and sought to know if the minister had indeed made the statement at a time when the CBI was opposing the bail pleas of corporate bigwigs jailed for their alleged role in the case. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The SC demanded a clarification from the government after additional solicitor general Harin Raval resumed arguments for the CBI, opposing the bail pleas of Unitech MD Sanjay Chandra and DB group executive Vinod Goenka. The SC said, "When the court is in the midst of an important hearing in the scam, a newspaper reported a responsible minister's statement hinting as if the courts were interested in keeping businessmen behind bars." </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Khurshid had said in an interview to a newspaper, "What will affect the functioning of the government is if the other institutions do not understand the kind of political economy we are faced with today; what is needed to encourage growth and investment? If you lock up top businessmen, will investment come?" </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> When Raval said that he represented the CBI, the bench said, "You are representing the CBI and to say the CBI is not part of the central government will be a misnomer. It may be the personal view of the minister. We are in the midst of a serious hearing in the 2G case and we are not interested in anything. You clarify your stand." The bench also asked Raval about a media report that the CBI may not oppose Kanimozhi's bail plea. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Raval denied the report and said the agency was opposing the bail plea of Chandra and Goenka. He, however, sought time to discuss the issue with the minister and said he would get back to the court with a clarification. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> When the bench sought to know if the public relations department of the government had denied such misleading reports in the media, Raval argued that there was no change of circumstance from the time the apex court had denied bail to Kanimozhi and hence Chandra and Goenka deserved no relief. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But soon, the court referred to the minister's statement that the judiciary must understand the country's political economy and said there had been a spurt in economic crime. "Has the government made enough investment in investigating agencies to equip them to deal with such crime," it asked. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Attempting to draw away from the rapid questioning over Khurshid's reported statement, Raval cited a March 2003 report of the Committee on Reforms of Criminal Justice System headed by Justice VS Malimath to bolster his opposition to the bail pleas. But he faced another question from the bench: "Has the government accepted the Justice Malimath committee report?" It then asked Raval to get the Centre's response on this issue as well. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Supreme Court's posers could push the government on the back foot. For, Justice Malimath had recommended radical measures, including five-fold increase in the existing judge strength, separation of investigation from law and order duty of police and many other measures which have not yet been implemented by the government. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 13 October, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/2g-scam-does-govt-think-we-are-keeping-businessmen-in-jail-asks-sc/articleshow/10335932.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => '2g-scam-does-govt-think-we-are-keeping-businessmen-in-jail-asks-sc-10519', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10519, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 10408 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 2G scam: Does govt think we are keeping businessmen in jail, asks SC' $metaKeywords = 'Law and Justice,Corruption' $metaDesc = ' -The Economic Times The Supreme Court on Wednesday sought to know if the Centre and the CBI were on the same page on the prosecution of the 2G scam accused, given law minister Salman Khurshid's reported statement that investor sentiment would...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court on Wednesday sought to know if the Centre and the CBI were on the same page on the prosecution of the 2G scam accused, given law minister Salman Khurshid's reported statement that investor sentiment would be hurt if courts ordered the arrests of business persons. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">A bench of Justices GS Singhvi and HL Dattu said the statement implied that the SC wanted to keep businessmen in jail and sought to know if the minister had indeed made the statement at a time when the CBI was opposing the bail pleas of corporate bigwigs jailed for their alleged role in the case. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The SC demanded a clarification from the government after additional solicitor general Harin Raval resumed arguments for the CBI, opposing the bail pleas of Unitech MD Sanjay Chandra and DB group executive Vinod Goenka. The SC said, "When the court is in the midst of an important hearing in the scam, a newspaper reported a responsible minister's statement hinting as if the courts were interested in keeping businessmen behind bars." </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Khurshid had said in an interview to a newspaper, "What will affect the functioning of the government is if the other institutions do not understand the kind of political economy we are faced with today; what is needed to encourage growth and investment? If you lock up top businessmen, will investment come?" </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">When Raval said that he represented the CBI, the bench said, "You are representing the CBI and to say the CBI is not part of the central government will be a misnomer. It may be the personal view of the minister. We are in the midst of a serious hearing in the 2G case and we are not interested in anything. You clarify your stand." The bench also asked Raval about a media report that the CBI may not oppose Kanimozhi's bail plea. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Raval denied the report and said the agency was opposing the bail plea of Chandra and Goenka. He, however, sought time to discuss the issue with the minister and said he would get back to the court with a clarification. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">When the bench sought to know if the public relations department of the government had denied such misleading reports in the media, Raval argued that there was no change of circumstance from the time the apex court had denied bail to Kanimozhi and hence Chandra and Goenka deserved no relief. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But soon, the court referred to the minister's statement that the judiciary must understand the country's political economy and said there had been a spurt in economic crime. "Has the government made enough investment in investigating agencies to equip them to deal with such crime," it asked. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Attempting to draw away from the rapid questioning over Khurshid's reported statement, Raval cited a March 2003 report of the Committee on Reforms of Criminal Justice System headed by Justice VS Malimath to bolster his opposition to the bail pleas. But he faced another question from the bench: "Has the government accepted the Justice Malimath committee report?" It then asked Raval to get the Centre's response on this issue as well. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court's posers could push the government on the back foot. For, Justice Malimath had recommended radical measures, including five-fold increase in the existing judge strength, separation of investigation from law and order duty of police and many other measures which have not yet been implemented by the government.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
2G scam: Does govt think we are keeping businessmen in jail, asks SC |
-The Economic Times The Supreme Court on Wednesday sought to know if the Centre and the CBI were on the same page on the prosecution of the 2G scam accused, given law minister Salman Khurshid's reported statement that investor sentiment would be hurt if courts ordered the arrests of business persons. A bench of Justices GS Singhvi and HL Dattu said the statement implied that the SC wanted to keep businessmen in jail and sought to know if the minister had indeed made the statement at a time when the CBI was opposing the bail pleas of corporate bigwigs jailed for their alleged role in the case. The SC demanded a clarification from the government after additional solicitor general Harin Raval resumed arguments for the CBI, opposing the bail pleas of Unitech MD Sanjay Chandra and DB group executive Vinod Goenka. The SC said, "When the court is in the midst of an important hearing in the scam, a newspaper reported a responsible minister's statement hinting as if the courts were interested in keeping businessmen behind bars." Khurshid had said in an interview to a newspaper, "What will affect the functioning of the government is if the other institutions do not understand the kind of political economy we are faced with today; what is needed to encourage growth and investment? If you lock up top businessmen, will investment come?" When Raval said that he represented the CBI, the bench said, "You are representing the CBI and to say the CBI is not part of the central government will be a misnomer. It may be the personal view of the minister. We are in the midst of a serious hearing in the 2G case and we are not interested in anything. You clarify your stand." The bench also asked Raval about a media report that the CBI may not oppose Kanimozhi's bail plea. Raval denied the report and said the agency was opposing the bail plea of Chandra and Goenka. He, however, sought time to discuss the issue with the minister and said he would get back to the court with a clarification. When the bench sought to know if the public relations department of the government had denied such misleading reports in the media, Raval argued that there was no change of circumstance from the time the apex court had denied bail to Kanimozhi and hence Chandra and Goenka deserved no relief. But soon, the court referred to the minister's statement that the judiciary must understand the country's political economy and said there had been a spurt in economic crime. "Has the government made enough investment in investigating agencies to equip them to deal with such crime," it asked. Attempting to draw away from the rapid questioning over Khurshid's reported statement, Raval cited a March 2003 report of the Committee on Reforms of Criminal Justice System headed by Justice VS Malimath to bolster his opposition to the bail pleas. But he faced another question from the bench: "Has the government accepted the Justice Malimath committee report?" It then asked Raval to get the Centre's response on this issue as well. The Supreme Court's posers could push the government on the back foot. For, Justice Malimath had recommended radical measures, including five-fold increase in the existing judge strength, separation of investigation from law and order duty of police and many other measures which have not yet been implemented by the government.
|