Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/300-doctors-under-medical-council-of-india-lens-over-graft-charge-rema-nagarajan-4674573/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/300-doctors-under-medical-council-of-india-lens-over-graft-charge-rema-nagarajan-4674573/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/300-doctors-under-medical-council-of-india-lens-over-graft-charge-rema-nagarajan-4674573/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/300-doctors-under-medical-council-of-india-lens-over-graft-charge-rema-nagarajan-4674573/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f86ce573e48-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f86ce573e48-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f86ce573e48-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f86ce573e48-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f86ce573e48-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f86ce573e48-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f86ce573e48-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f86ce573e48-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f86ce573e48-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 26535, 'title' => '300 doctors under Medical Council of India lens over graft charge -Rema Nagarajan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India </div> <p align="justify"> The Medical Council of India has summoned about 300 doctors from across the country to Delhi to answer questions on an anonymous complaint that they had been bribed by a pharmaceutical firm. About 100 of these doctors appeared before MCI's ethics committee on Monday. </p> <p align="justify"> According to the complaint, the Ahmedabad-based pharma company has been paying doctors lakhs of rupees as well as gifting them cars and flats and sponsoring family foreign trips in return for prescribing its medicines even though cheaper alternatives from better known companies are available. </p> <p align="justify"> Of the 150 doctors summoned to appear at the last meeting of the ethics committee, 109 appeared. The rest were summoned on Monday. &quot;About 135 are left and they have been asked to appear at the next meeting of the committee in December. According to the rules, they have to be given three chances,&quot; explained Dr KK Aggarwal, a member of the panel. </p> <p align="justify"> The letter asking doctors to appear before the committee on Monday said: &quot;Please bring your ITR, bank statement for the last three years, passport in original, as well as a set of photocopies of the said documents.&quot; The letter also warned that &quot;in case you fail to appear on the above said date and time, the ethics committee will proceed for ex parte decision against you on the basis of available records in the council office&quot;. </p> <p align="justify"> That had about 100 doctors thronging MCI's office. They were asked to give a response in writing. While many submitted their responses and documents immediately, others chose to wait and talk to their lawyers. &quot;The letter sent to us with a copy of the complaint did not include the details of the charges against us though the complaint did mention that it included details of charges against each doctor. Without knowing the exact allegation against us, how can we be expected to respond?&quot; said a doctor. </p> <p align="justify"> Dr Ajay Kumar, who chaired Monday's meeting, said, &quot;They have a week to respond. We did not want to reveal the exact allegations against them in the letters. But when they appeared today, the complaint against them was read out. Now they know the content of the complaint and they have been given a proforma to fill as response.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> The anonymous complaint was received by the department of pharmaceuticals in August. &quot;The vigilance division of the department was of the view that since it involved such a large number of doctors, it ought to be examined in detail. So, they sent it to MCI in the first week of September, though anonymous complaints are usually disregarded,&quot; said Dr Aggarwal. </p> <p align="justify"> According to the complaint, one of the ways in which the firm would bribe doctors would be by paying lakhs of rupees for running advertisements on a TV installed in their clinics. The letter gave the name of each doctor with his or her address and the bribe given to him or her. </p> <p align="justify"> It alleged that the doctors were violating basic norms and claimed that the turnover of the company had grown from zero to Rs 400 crore in just five years. The letter alleged that company's brands were priced 15% to 30% higher than those of well-established companies like Cipla, Ranbaxy, Sun, Aristo, Alkem, Zydus and Cadila but still doctors were prescribing its products as the company &quot;was buying doctors by way of offering various means of bribes&quot;. </p> <p align="justify"> The complainant claimed that the firm was adding the cost of bribes to its products, forcing the patient to pay up. The complainant sought an I-T probe since doctors who allegedly accepted these bribes were evading income tax. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 18 November, 2014, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/300-doctors-under-Medical-Council-of-India-lens-over-graft-charge/articleshow/45183105.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => '300-doctors-under-medical-council-of-india-lens-over-graft-charge-rema-nagarajan-4674573', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4674573, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 26535, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 300 doctors under Medical Council of India lens over graft charge -Rema Nagarajan', 'metaKeywords' => 'Access to Healthcare,Graft,Corruption,doctors,Medical Council of India,MCI,Health', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Times of India The Medical Council of India has summoned about 300 doctors from across the country to Delhi to answer questions on an anonymous complaint that they had been bribed by a pharmaceutical firm. About 100 of these doctors...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify">The Medical Council of India has summoned about 300 doctors from across the country to Delhi to answer questions on an anonymous complaint that they had been bribed by a pharmaceutical firm. About 100 of these doctors appeared before MCI's ethics committee on Monday.</p><p align="justify">According to the complaint, the Ahmedabad-based pharma company has been paying doctors lakhs of rupees as well as gifting them cars and flats and sponsoring family foreign trips in return for prescribing its medicines even though cheaper alternatives from better known companies are available.</p><p align="justify">Of the 150 doctors summoned to appear at the last meeting of the ethics committee, 109 appeared. The rest were summoned on Monday. &quot;About 135 are left and they have been asked to appear at the next meeting of the committee in December. According to the rules, they have to be given three chances,&quot; explained Dr KK Aggarwal, a member of the panel.</p><p align="justify">The letter asking doctors to appear before the committee on Monday said: &quot;Please bring your ITR, bank statement for the last three years, passport in original, as well as a set of photocopies of the said documents.&quot; The letter also warned that &quot;in case you fail to appear on the above said date and time, the ethics committee will proceed for ex parte decision against you on the basis of available records in the council office&quot;.</p><p align="justify">That had about 100 doctors thronging MCI's office. They were asked to give a response in writing. While many submitted their responses and documents immediately, others chose to wait and talk to their lawyers. &quot;The letter sent to us with a copy of the complaint did not include the details of the charges against us though the complaint did mention that it included details of charges against each doctor. Without knowing the exact allegation against us, how can we be expected to respond?&quot; said a doctor.</p><p align="justify">Dr Ajay Kumar, who chaired Monday's meeting, said, &quot;They have a week to respond. We did not want to reveal the exact allegations against them in the letters. But when they appeared today, the complaint against them was read out. Now they know the content of the complaint and they have been given a proforma to fill as response.&quot;</p><p align="justify">The anonymous complaint was received by the department of pharmaceuticals in August. &quot;The vigilance division of the department was of the view that since it involved such a large number of doctors, it ought to be examined in detail. So, they sent it to MCI in the first week of September, though anonymous complaints are usually disregarded,&quot; said Dr Aggarwal.</p><p align="justify">According to the complaint, one of the ways in which the firm would bribe doctors would be by paying lakhs of rupees for running advertisements on a TV installed in their clinics. The letter gave the name of each doctor with his or her address and the bribe given to him or her.</p><p align="justify">It alleged that the doctors were violating basic norms and claimed that the turnover of the company had grown from zero to Rs 400 crore in just five years. The letter alleged that company's brands were priced 15% to 30% higher than those of well-established companies like Cipla, Ranbaxy, Sun, Aristo, Alkem, Zydus and Cadila but still doctors were prescribing its products as the company &quot;was buying doctors by way of offering various means of bribes&quot;.</p><p align="justify">The complainant claimed that the firm was adding the cost of bribes to its products, forcing the patient to pay up. The complainant sought an I-T probe since doctors who allegedly accepted these bribes were evading income tax. </p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 26535, 'title' => '300 doctors under Medical Council of India lens over graft charge -Rema Nagarajan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India </div> <p align="justify"> The Medical Council of India has summoned about 300 doctors from across the country to Delhi to answer questions on an anonymous complaint that they had been bribed by a pharmaceutical firm. About 100 of these doctors appeared before MCI's ethics committee on Monday. </p> <p align="justify"> According to the complaint, the Ahmedabad-based pharma company has been paying doctors lakhs of rupees as well as gifting them cars and flats and sponsoring family foreign trips in return for prescribing its medicines even though cheaper alternatives from better known companies are available. </p> <p align="justify"> Of the 150 doctors summoned to appear at the last meeting of the ethics committee, 109 appeared. The rest were summoned on Monday. &quot;About 135 are left and they have been asked to appear at the next meeting of the committee in December. According to the rules, they have to be given three chances,&quot; explained Dr KK Aggarwal, a member of the panel. </p> <p align="justify"> The letter asking doctors to appear before the committee on Monday said: &quot;Please bring your ITR, bank statement for the last three years, passport in original, as well as a set of photocopies of the said documents.&quot; The letter also warned that &quot;in case you fail to appear on the above said date and time, the ethics committee will proceed for ex parte decision against you on the basis of available records in the council office&quot;. </p> <p align="justify"> That had about 100 doctors thronging MCI's office. They were asked to give a response in writing. While many submitted their responses and documents immediately, others chose to wait and talk to their lawyers. &quot;The letter sent to us with a copy of the complaint did not include the details of the charges against us though the complaint did mention that it included details of charges against each doctor. Without knowing the exact allegation against us, how can we be expected to respond?&quot; said a doctor. </p> <p align="justify"> Dr Ajay Kumar, who chaired Monday's meeting, said, &quot;They have a week to respond. We did not want to reveal the exact allegations against them in the letters. But when they appeared today, the complaint against them was read out. Now they know the content of the complaint and they have been given a proforma to fill as response.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> The anonymous complaint was received by the department of pharmaceuticals in August. &quot;The vigilance division of the department was of the view that since it involved such a large number of doctors, it ought to be examined in detail. So, they sent it to MCI in the first week of September, though anonymous complaints are usually disregarded,&quot; said Dr Aggarwal. </p> <p align="justify"> According to the complaint, one of the ways in which the firm would bribe doctors would be by paying lakhs of rupees for running advertisements on a TV installed in their clinics. The letter gave the name of each doctor with his or her address and the bribe given to him or her. </p> <p align="justify"> It alleged that the doctors were violating basic norms and claimed that the turnover of the company had grown from zero to Rs 400 crore in just five years. The letter alleged that company's brands were priced 15% to 30% higher than those of well-established companies like Cipla, Ranbaxy, Sun, Aristo, Alkem, Zydus and Cadila but still doctors were prescribing its products as the company &quot;was buying doctors by way of offering various means of bribes&quot;. </p> <p align="justify"> The complainant claimed that the firm was adding the cost of bribes to its products, forcing the patient to pay up. The complainant sought an I-T probe since doctors who allegedly accepted these bribes were evading income tax. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 18 November, 2014, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/300-doctors-under-Medical-Council-of-India-lens-over-graft-charge/articleshow/45183105.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => '300-doctors-under-medical-council-of-india-lens-over-graft-charge-rema-nagarajan-4674573', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4674573, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 5 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 6 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 26535 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 300 doctors under Medical Council of India lens over graft charge -Rema Nagarajan' $metaKeywords = 'Access to Healthcare,Graft,Corruption,doctors,Medical Council of India,MCI,Health' $metaDesc = ' -The Times of India The Medical Council of India has summoned about 300 doctors from across the country to Delhi to answer questions on an anonymous complaint that they had been bribed by a pharmaceutical firm. About 100 of these doctors...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify">The Medical Council of India has summoned about 300 doctors from across the country to Delhi to answer questions on an anonymous complaint that they had been bribed by a pharmaceutical firm. About 100 of these doctors appeared before MCI's ethics committee on Monday.</p><p align="justify">According to the complaint, the Ahmedabad-based pharma company has been paying doctors lakhs of rupees as well as gifting them cars and flats and sponsoring family foreign trips in return for prescribing its medicines even though cheaper alternatives from better known companies are available.</p><p align="justify">Of the 150 doctors summoned to appear at the last meeting of the ethics committee, 109 appeared. The rest were summoned on Monday. &quot;About 135 are left and they have been asked to appear at the next meeting of the committee in December. According to the rules, they have to be given three chances,&quot; explained Dr KK Aggarwal, a member of the panel.</p><p align="justify">The letter asking doctors to appear before the committee on Monday said: &quot;Please bring your ITR, bank statement for the last three years, passport in original, as well as a set of photocopies of the said documents.&quot; The letter also warned that &quot;in case you fail to appear on the above said date and time, the ethics committee will proceed for ex parte decision against you on the basis of available records in the council office&quot;.</p><p align="justify">That had about 100 doctors thronging MCI's office. They were asked to give a response in writing. While many submitted their responses and documents immediately, others chose to wait and talk to their lawyers. &quot;The letter sent to us with a copy of the complaint did not include the details of the charges against us though the complaint did mention that it included details of charges against each doctor. Without knowing the exact allegation against us, how can we be expected to respond?&quot; said a doctor.</p><p align="justify">Dr Ajay Kumar, who chaired Monday's meeting, said, &quot;They have a week to respond. We did not want to reveal the exact allegations against them in the letters. But when they appeared today, the complaint against them was read out. Now they know the content of the complaint and they have been given a proforma to fill as response.&quot;</p><p align="justify">The anonymous complaint was received by the department of pharmaceuticals in August. &quot;The vigilance division of the department was of the view that since it involved such a large number of doctors, it ought to be examined in detail. So, they sent it to MCI in the first week of September, though anonymous complaints are usually disregarded,&quot; said Dr Aggarwal.</p><p align="justify">According to the complaint, one of the ways in which the firm would bribe doctors would be by paying lakhs of rupees for running advertisements on a TV installed in their clinics. The letter gave the name of each doctor with his or her address and the bribe given to him or her.</p><p align="justify">It alleged that the doctors were violating basic norms and claimed that the turnover of the company had grown from zero to Rs 400 crore in just five years. The letter alleged that company's brands were priced 15% to 30% higher than those of well-established companies like Cipla, Ranbaxy, Sun, Aristo, Alkem, Zydus and Cadila but still doctors were prescribing its products as the company &quot;was buying doctors by way of offering various means of bribes&quot;.</p><p align="justify">The complainant claimed that the firm was adding the cost of bribes to its products, forcing the patient to pay up. The complainant sought an I-T probe since doctors who allegedly accepted these bribes were evading income tax. </p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/300-doctors-under-medical-council-of-india-lens-over-graft-charge-rema-nagarajan-4674573.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 300 doctors under Medical Council of India lens over graft charge -Rema Nagarajan | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Times of India The Medical Council of India has summoned about 300 doctors from across the country to Delhi to answer questions on an anonymous complaint that they had been bribed by a pharmaceutical firm. About 100 of these doctors..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>300 doctors under Medical Council of India lens over graft charge -Rema Nagarajan</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify">The Medical Council of India has summoned about 300 doctors from across the country to Delhi to answer questions on an anonymous complaint that they had been bribed by a pharmaceutical firm. About 100 of these doctors appeared before MCI's ethics committee on Monday.</p><p align="justify">According to the complaint, the Ahmedabad-based pharma company has been paying doctors lakhs of rupees as well as gifting them cars and flats and sponsoring family foreign trips in return for prescribing its medicines even though cheaper alternatives from better known companies are available.</p><p align="justify">Of the 150 doctors summoned to appear at the last meeting of the ethics committee, 109 appeared. The rest were summoned on Monday. "About 135 are left and they have been asked to appear at the next meeting of the committee in December. According to the rules, they have to be given three chances," explained Dr KK Aggarwal, a member of the panel.</p><p align="justify">The letter asking doctors to appear before the committee on Monday said: "Please bring your ITR, bank statement for the last three years, passport in original, as well as a set of photocopies of the said documents." The letter also warned that "in case you fail to appear on the above said date and time, the ethics committee will proceed for ex parte decision against you on the basis of available records in the council office".</p><p align="justify">That had about 100 doctors thronging MCI's office. They were asked to give a response in writing. While many submitted their responses and documents immediately, others chose to wait and talk to their lawyers. "The letter sent to us with a copy of the complaint did not include the details of the charges against us though the complaint did mention that it included details of charges against each doctor. Without knowing the exact allegation against us, how can we be expected to respond?" said a doctor.</p><p align="justify">Dr Ajay Kumar, who chaired Monday's meeting, said, "They have a week to respond. We did not want to reveal the exact allegations against them in the letters. But when they appeared today, the complaint against them was read out. Now they know the content of the complaint and they have been given a proforma to fill as response."</p><p align="justify">The anonymous complaint was received by the department of pharmaceuticals in August. "The vigilance division of the department was of the view that since it involved such a large number of doctors, it ought to be examined in detail. So, they sent it to MCI in the first week of September, though anonymous complaints are usually disregarded," said Dr Aggarwal.</p><p align="justify">According to the complaint, one of the ways in which the firm would bribe doctors would be by paying lakhs of rupees for running advertisements on a TV installed in their clinics. The letter gave the name of each doctor with his or her address and the bribe given to him or her.</p><p align="justify">It alleged that the doctors were violating basic norms and claimed that the turnover of the company had grown from zero to Rs 400 crore in just five years. The letter alleged that company's brands were priced 15% to 30% higher than those of well-established companies like Cipla, Ranbaxy, Sun, Aristo, Alkem, Zydus and Cadila but still doctors were prescribing its products as the company "was buying doctors by way of offering various means of bribes".</p><p align="justify">The complainant claimed that the firm was adding the cost of bribes to its products, forcing the patient to pay up. The complainant sought an I-T probe since doctors who allegedly accepted these bribes were evading income tax. </p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f86ce573e48-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f86ce573e48-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f86ce573e48-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f86ce573e48-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f86ce573e48-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f86ce573e48-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f86ce573e48-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f86ce573e48-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f86ce573e48-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 26535, 'title' => '300 doctors under Medical Council of India lens over graft charge -Rema Nagarajan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India </div> <p align="justify"> The Medical Council of India has summoned about 300 doctors from across the country to Delhi to answer questions on an anonymous complaint that they had been bribed by a pharmaceutical firm. About 100 of these doctors appeared before MCI's ethics committee on Monday. </p> <p align="justify"> According to the complaint, the Ahmedabad-based pharma company has been paying doctors lakhs of rupees as well as gifting them cars and flats and sponsoring family foreign trips in return for prescribing its medicines even though cheaper alternatives from better known companies are available. </p> <p align="justify"> Of the 150 doctors summoned to appear at the last meeting of the ethics committee, 109 appeared. The rest were summoned on Monday. &quot;About 135 are left and they have been asked to appear at the next meeting of the committee in December. According to the rules, they have to be given three chances,&quot; explained Dr KK Aggarwal, a member of the panel. </p> <p align="justify"> The letter asking doctors to appear before the committee on Monday said: &quot;Please bring your ITR, bank statement for the last three years, passport in original, as well as a set of photocopies of the said documents.&quot; The letter also warned that &quot;in case you fail to appear on the above said date and time, the ethics committee will proceed for ex parte decision against you on the basis of available records in the council office&quot;. </p> <p align="justify"> That had about 100 doctors thronging MCI's office. They were asked to give a response in writing. While many submitted their responses and documents immediately, others chose to wait and talk to their lawyers. &quot;The letter sent to us with a copy of the complaint did not include the details of the charges against us though the complaint did mention that it included details of charges against each doctor. Without knowing the exact allegation against us, how can we be expected to respond?&quot; said a doctor. </p> <p align="justify"> Dr Ajay Kumar, who chaired Monday's meeting, said, &quot;They have a week to respond. We did not want to reveal the exact allegations against them in the letters. But when they appeared today, the complaint against them was read out. Now they know the content of the complaint and they have been given a proforma to fill as response.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> The anonymous complaint was received by the department of pharmaceuticals in August. &quot;The vigilance division of the department was of the view that since it involved such a large number of doctors, it ought to be examined in detail. So, they sent it to MCI in the first week of September, though anonymous complaints are usually disregarded,&quot; said Dr Aggarwal. </p> <p align="justify"> According to the complaint, one of the ways in which the firm would bribe doctors would be by paying lakhs of rupees for running advertisements on a TV installed in their clinics. The letter gave the name of each doctor with his or her address and the bribe given to him or her. </p> <p align="justify"> It alleged that the doctors were violating basic norms and claimed that the turnover of the company had grown from zero to Rs 400 crore in just five years. The letter alleged that company's brands were priced 15% to 30% higher than those of well-established companies like Cipla, Ranbaxy, Sun, Aristo, Alkem, Zydus and Cadila but still doctors were prescribing its products as the company &quot;was buying doctors by way of offering various means of bribes&quot;. </p> <p align="justify"> The complainant claimed that the firm was adding the cost of bribes to its products, forcing the patient to pay up. The complainant sought an I-T probe since doctors who allegedly accepted these bribes were evading income tax. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 18 November, 2014, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/300-doctors-under-Medical-Council-of-India-lens-over-graft-charge/articleshow/45183105.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => '300-doctors-under-medical-council-of-india-lens-over-graft-charge-rema-nagarajan-4674573', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4674573, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 26535, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 300 doctors under Medical Council of India lens over graft charge -Rema Nagarajan', 'metaKeywords' => 'Access to Healthcare,Graft,Corruption,doctors,Medical Council of India,MCI,Health', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Times of India The Medical Council of India has summoned about 300 doctors from across the country to Delhi to answer questions on an anonymous complaint that they had been bribed by a pharmaceutical firm. About 100 of these doctors...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify">The Medical Council of India has summoned about 300 doctors from across the country to Delhi to answer questions on an anonymous complaint that they had been bribed by a pharmaceutical firm. About 100 of these doctors appeared before MCI's ethics committee on Monday.</p><p align="justify">According to the complaint, the Ahmedabad-based pharma company has been paying doctors lakhs of rupees as well as gifting them cars and flats and sponsoring family foreign trips in return for prescribing its medicines even though cheaper alternatives from better known companies are available.</p><p align="justify">Of the 150 doctors summoned to appear at the last meeting of the ethics committee, 109 appeared. The rest were summoned on Monday. &quot;About 135 are left and they have been asked to appear at the next meeting of the committee in December. According to the rules, they have to be given three chances,&quot; explained Dr KK Aggarwal, a member of the panel.</p><p align="justify">The letter asking doctors to appear before the committee on Monday said: &quot;Please bring your ITR, bank statement for the last three years, passport in original, as well as a set of photocopies of the said documents.&quot; The letter also warned that &quot;in case you fail to appear on the above said date and time, the ethics committee will proceed for ex parte decision against you on the basis of available records in the council office&quot;.</p><p align="justify">That had about 100 doctors thronging MCI's office. They were asked to give a response in writing. While many submitted their responses and documents immediately, others chose to wait and talk to their lawyers. &quot;The letter sent to us with a copy of the complaint did not include the details of the charges against us though the complaint did mention that it included details of charges against each doctor. Without knowing the exact allegation against us, how can we be expected to respond?&quot; said a doctor.</p><p align="justify">Dr Ajay Kumar, who chaired Monday's meeting, said, &quot;They have a week to respond. We did not want to reveal the exact allegations against them in the letters. But when they appeared today, the complaint against them was read out. Now they know the content of the complaint and they have been given a proforma to fill as response.&quot;</p><p align="justify">The anonymous complaint was received by the department of pharmaceuticals in August. &quot;The vigilance division of the department was of the view that since it involved such a large number of doctors, it ought to be examined in detail. So, they sent it to MCI in the first week of September, though anonymous complaints are usually disregarded,&quot; said Dr Aggarwal.</p><p align="justify">According to the complaint, one of the ways in which the firm would bribe doctors would be by paying lakhs of rupees for running advertisements on a TV installed in their clinics. The letter gave the name of each doctor with his or her address and the bribe given to him or her.</p><p align="justify">It alleged that the doctors were violating basic norms and claimed that the turnover of the company had grown from zero to Rs 400 crore in just five years. The letter alleged that company's brands were priced 15% to 30% higher than those of well-established companies like Cipla, Ranbaxy, Sun, Aristo, Alkem, Zydus and Cadila but still doctors were prescribing its products as the company &quot;was buying doctors by way of offering various means of bribes&quot;.</p><p align="justify">The complainant claimed that the firm was adding the cost of bribes to its products, forcing the patient to pay up. The complainant sought an I-T probe since doctors who allegedly accepted these bribes were evading income tax. </p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 26535, 'title' => '300 doctors under Medical Council of India lens over graft charge -Rema Nagarajan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India </div> <p align="justify"> The Medical Council of India has summoned about 300 doctors from across the country to Delhi to answer questions on an anonymous complaint that they had been bribed by a pharmaceutical firm. About 100 of these doctors appeared before MCI's ethics committee on Monday. </p> <p align="justify"> According to the complaint, the Ahmedabad-based pharma company has been paying doctors lakhs of rupees as well as gifting them cars and flats and sponsoring family foreign trips in return for prescribing its medicines even though cheaper alternatives from better known companies are available. </p> <p align="justify"> Of the 150 doctors summoned to appear at the last meeting of the ethics committee, 109 appeared. The rest were summoned on Monday. &quot;About 135 are left and they have been asked to appear at the next meeting of the committee in December. According to the rules, they have to be given three chances,&quot; explained Dr KK Aggarwal, a member of the panel. </p> <p align="justify"> The letter asking doctors to appear before the committee on Monday said: &quot;Please bring your ITR, bank statement for the last three years, passport in original, as well as a set of photocopies of the said documents.&quot; The letter also warned that &quot;in case you fail to appear on the above said date and time, the ethics committee will proceed for ex parte decision against you on the basis of available records in the council office&quot;. </p> <p align="justify"> That had about 100 doctors thronging MCI's office. They were asked to give a response in writing. While many submitted their responses and documents immediately, others chose to wait and talk to their lawyers. &quot;The letter sent to us with a copy of the complaint did not include the details of the charges against us though the complaint did mention that it included details of charges against each doctor. Without knowing the exact allegation against us, how can we be expected to respond?&quot; said a doctor. </p> <p align="justify"> Dr Ajay Kumar, who chaired Monday's meeting, said, &quot;They have a week to respond. We did not want to reveal the exact allegations against them in the letters. But when they appeared today, the complaint against them was read out. Now they know the content of the complaint and they have been given a proforma to fill as response.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> The anonymous complaint was received by the department of pharmaceuticals in August. &quot;The vigilance division of the department was of the view that since it involved such a large number of doctors, it ought to be examined in detail. So, they sent it to MCI in the first week of September, though anonymous complaints are usually disregarded,&quot; said Dr Aggarwal. </p> <p align="justify"> According to the complaint, one of the ways in which the firm would bribe doctors would be by paying lakhs of rupees for running advertisements on a TV installed in their clinics. The letter gave the name of each doctor with his or her address and the bribe given to him or her. </p> <p align="justify"> It alleged that the doctors were violating basic norms and claimed that the turnover of the company had grown from zero to Rs 400 crore in just five years. The letter alleged that company's brands were priced 15% to 30% higher than those of well-established companies like Cipla, Ranbaxy, Sun, Aristo, Alkem, Zydus and Cadila but still doctors were prescribing its products as the company &quot;was buying doctors by way of offering various means of bribes&quot;. </p> <p align="justify"> The complainant claimed that the firm was adding the cost of bribes to its products, forcing the patient to pay up. The complainant sought an I-T probe since doctors who allegedly accepted these bribes were evading income tax. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 18 November, 2014, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/300-doctors-under-Medical-Council-of-India-lens-over-graft-charge/articleshow/45183105.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => '300-doctors-under-medical-council-of-india-lens-over-graft-charge-rema-nagarajan-4674573', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4674573, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 5 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 6 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 26535 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 300 doctors under Medical Council of India lens over graft charge -Rema Nagarajan' $metaKeywords = 'Access to Healthcare,Graft,Corruption,doctors,Medical Council of India,MCI,Health' $metaDesc = ' -The Times of India The Medical Council of India has summoned about 300 doctors from across the country to Delhi to answer questions on an anonymous complaint that they had been bribed by a pharmaceutical firm. About 100 of these doctors...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify">The Medical Council of India has summoned about 300 doctors from across the country to Delhi to answer questions on an anonymous complaint that they had been bribed by a pharmaceutical firm. About 100 of these doctors appeared before MCI's ethics committee on Monday.</p><p align="justify">According to the complaint, the Ahmedabad-based pharma company has been paying doctors lakhs of rupees as well as gifting them cars and flats and sponsoring family foreign trips in return for prescribing its medicines even though cheaper alternatives from better known companies are available.</p><p align="justify">Of the 150 doctors summoned to appear at the last meeting of the ethics committee, 109 appeared. The rest were summoned on Monday. &quot;About 135 are left and they have been asked to appear at the next meeting of the committee in December. According to the rules, they have to be given three chances,&quot; explained Dr KK Aggarwal, a member of the panel.</p><p align="justify">The letter asking doctors to appear before the committee on Monday said: &quot;Please bring your ITR, bank statement for the last three years, passport in original, as well as a set of photocopies of the said documents.&quot; The letter also warned that &quot;in case you fail to appear on the above said date and time, the ethics committee will proceed for ex parte decision against you on the basis of available records in the council office&quot;.</p><p align="justify">That had about 100 doctors thronging MCI's office. They were asked to give a response in writing. While many submitted their responses and documents immediately, others chose to wait and talk to their lawyers. &quot;The letter sent to us with a copy of the complaint did not include the details of the charges against us though the complaint did mention that it included details of charges against each doctor. Without knowing the exact allegation against us, how can we be expected to respond?&quot; said a doctor.</p><p align="justify">Dr Ajay Kumar, who chaired Monday's meeting, said, &quot;They have a week to respond. We did not want to reveal the exact allegations against them in the letters. But when they appeared today, the complaint against them was read out. Now they know the content of the complaint and they have been given a proforma to fill as response.&quot;</p><p align="justify">The anonymous complaint was received by the department of pharmaceuticals in August. &quot;The vigilance division of the department was of the view that since it involved such a large number of doctors, it ought to be examined in detail. So, they sent it to MCI in the first week of September, though anonymous complaints are usually disregarded,&quot; said Dr Aggarwal.</p><p align="justify">According to the complaint, one of the ways in which the firm would bribe doctors would be by paying lakhs of rupees for running advertisements on a TV installed in their clinics. The letter gave the name of each doctor with his or her address and the bribe given to him or her.</p><p align="justify">It alleged that the doctors were violating basic norms and claimed that the turnover of the company had grown from zero to Rs 400 crore in just five years. The letter alleged that company's brands were priced 15% to 30% higher than those of well-established companies like Cipla, Ranbaxy, Sun, Aristo, Alkem, Zydus and Cadila but still doctors were prescribing its products as the company &quot;was buying doctors by way of offering various means of bribes&quot;.</p><p align="justify">The complainant claimed that the firm was adding the cost of bribes to its products, forcing the patient to pay up. The complainant sought an I-T probe since doctors who allegedly accepted these bribes were evading income tax. </p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/300-doctors-under-medical-council-of-india-lens-over-graft-charge-rema-nagarajan-4674573.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 300 doctors under Medical Council of India lens over graft charge -Rema Nagarajan | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Times of India The Medical Council of India has summoned about 300 doctors from across the country to Delhi to answer questions on an anonymous complaint that they had been bribed by a pharmaceutical firm. About 100 of these doctors..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>300 doctors under Medical Council of India lens over graft charge -Rema Nagarajan</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify">The Medical Council of India has summoned about 300 doctors from across the country to Delhi to answer questions on an anonymous complaint that they had been bribed by a pharmaceutical firm. About 100 of these doctors appeared before MCI's ethics committee on Monday.</p><p align="justify">According to the complaint, the Ahmedabad-based pharma company has been paying doctors lakhs of rupees as well as gifting them cars and flats and sponsoring family foreign trips in return for prescribing its medicines even though cheaper alternatives from better known companies are available.</p><p align="justify">Of the 150 doctors summoned to appear at the last meeting of the ethics committee, 109 appeared. The rest were summoned on Monday. "About 135 are left and they have been asked to appear at the next meeting of the committee in December. According to the rules, they have to be given three chances," explained Dr KK Aggarwal, a member of the panel.</p><p align="justify">The letter asking doctors to appear before the committee on Monday said: "Please bring your ITR, bank statement for the last three years, passport in original, as well as a set of photocopies of the said documents." The letter also warned that "in case you fail to appear on the above said date and time, the ethics committee will proceed for ex parte decision against you on the basis of available records in the council office".</p><p align="justify">That had about 100 doctors thronging MCI's office. They were asked to give a response in writing. While many submitted their responses and documents immediately, others chose to wait and talk to their lawyers. "The letter sent to us with a copy of the complaint did not include the details of the charges against us though the complaint did mention that it included details of charges against each doctor. Without knowing the exact allegation against us, how can we be expected to respond?" said a doctor.</p><p align="justify">Dr Ajay Kumar, who chaired Monday's meeting, said, "They have a week to respond. We did not want to reveal the exact allegations against them in the letters. But when they appeared today, the complaint against them was read out. Now they know the content of the complaint and they have been given a proforma to fill as response."</p><p align="justify">The anonymous complaint was received by the department of pharmaceuticals in August. "The vigilance division of the department was of the view that since it involved such a large number of doctors, it ought to be examined in detail. So, they sent it to MCI in the first week of September, though anonymous complaints are usually disregarded," said Dr Aggarwal.</p><p align="justify">According to the complaint, one of the ways in which the firm would bribe doctors would be by paying lakhs of rupees for running advertisements on a TV installed in their clinics. The letter gave the name of each doctor with his or her address and the bribe given to him or her.</p><p align="justify">It alleged that the doctors were violating basic norms and claimed that the turnover of the company had grown from zero to Rs 400 crore in just five years. The letter alleged that company's brands were priced 15% to 30% higher than those of well-established companies like Cipla, Ranbaxy, Sun, Aristo, Alkem, Zydus and Cadila but still doctors were prescribing its products as the company "was buying doctors by way of offering various means of bribes".</p><p align="justify">The complainant claimed that the firm was adding the cost of bribes to its products, forcing the patient to pay up. The complainant sought an I-T probe since doctors who allegedly accepted these bribes were evading income tax. </p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f86ce573e48-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f86ce573e48-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f86ce573e48-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f86ce573e48-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f86ce573e48-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f86ce573e48-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f86ce573e48-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f86ce573e48-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f86ce573e48-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 26535, 'title' => '300 doctors under Medical Council of India lens over graft charge -Rema Nagarajan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India </div> <p align="justify"> The Medical Council of India has summoned about 300 doctors from across the country to Delhi to answer questions on an anonymous complaint that they had been bribed by a pharmaceutical firm. About 100 of these doctors appeared before MCI's ethics committee on Monday. </p> <p align="justify"> According to the complaint, the Ahmedabad-based pharma company has been paying doctors lakhs of rupees as well as gifting them cars and flats and sponsoring family foreign trips in return for prescribing its medicines even though cheaper alternatives from better known companies are available. </p> <p align="justify"> Of the 150 doctors summoned to appear at the last meeting of the ethics committee, 109 appeared. The rest were summoned on Monday. &quot;About 135 are left and they have been asked to appear at the next meeting of the committee in December. According to the rules, they have to be given three chances,&quot; explained Dr KK Aggarwal, a member of the panel. </p> <p align="justify"> The letter asking doctors to appear before the committee on Monday said: &quot;Please bring your ITR, bank statement for the last three years, passport in original, as well as a set of photocopies of the said documents.&quot; The letter also warned that &quot;in case you fail to appear on the above said date and time, the ethics committee will proceed for ex parte decision against you on the basis of available records in the council office&quot;. </p> <p align="justify"> That had about 100 doctors thronging MCI's office. They were asked to give a response in writing. While many submitted their responses and documents immediately, others chose to wait and talk to their lawyers. &quot;The letter sent to us with a copy of the complaint did not include the details of the charges against us though the complaint did mention that it included details of charges against each doctor. Without knowing the exact allegation against us, how can we be expected to respond?&quot; said a doctor. </p> <p align="justify"> Dr Ajay Kumar, who chaired Monday's meeting, said, &quot;They have a week to respond. We did not want to reveal the exact allegations against them in the letters. But when they appeared today, the complaint against them was read out. Now they know the content of the complaint and they have been given a proforma to fill as response.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> The anonymous complaint was received by the department of pharmaceuticals in August. &quot;The vigilance division of the department was of the view that since it involved such a large number of doctors, it ought to be examined in detail. So, they sent it to MCI in the first week of September, though anonymous complaints are usually disregarded,&quot; said Dr Aggarwal. </p> <p align="justify"> According to the complaint, one of the ways in which the firm would bribe doctors would be by paying lakhs of rupees for running advertisements on a TV installed in their clinics. The letter gave the name of each doctor with his or her address and the bribe given to him or her. </p> <p align="justify"> It alleged that the doctors were violating basic norms and claimed that the turnover of the company had grown from zero to Rs 400 crore in just five years. The letter alleged that company's brands were priced 15% to 30% higher than those of well-established companies like Cipla, Ranbaxy, Sun, Aristo, Alkem, Zydus and Cadila but still doctors were prescribing its products as the company &quot;was buying doctors by way of offering various means of bribes&quot;. </p> <p align="justify"> The complainant claimed that the firm was adding the cost of bribes to its products, forcing the patient to pay up. The complainant sought an I-T probe since doctors who allegedly accepted these bribes were evading income tax. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 18 November, 2014, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/300-doctors-under-Medical-Council-of-India-lens-over-graft-charge/articleshow/45183105.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => '300-doctors-under-medical-council-of-india-lens-over-graft-charge-rema-nagarajan-4674573', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4674573, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 26535, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 300 doctors under Medical Council of India lens over graft charge -Rema Nagarajan', 'metaKeywords' => 'Access to Healthcare,Graft,Corruption,doctors,Medical Council of India,MCI,Health', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Times of India The Medical Council of India has summoned about 300 doctors from across the country to Delhi to answer questions on an anonymous complaint that they had been bribed by a pharmaceutical firm. About 100 of these doctors...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify">The Medical Council of India has summoned about 300 doctors from across the country to Delhi to answer questions on an anonymous complaint that they had been bribed by a pharmaceutical firm. About 100 of these doctors appeared before MCI's ethics committee on Monday.</p><p align="justify">According to the complaint, the Ahmedabad-based pharma company has been paying doctors lakhs of rupees as well as gifting them cars and flats and sponsoring family foreign trips in return for prescribing its medicines even though cheaper alternatives from better known companies are available.</p><p align="justify">Of the 150 doctors summoned to appear at the last meeting of the ethics committee, 109 appeared. The rest were summoned on Monday. &quot;About 135 are left and they have been asked to appear at the next meeting of the committee in December. According to the rules, they have to be given three chances,&quot; explained Dr KK Aggarwal, a member of the panel.</p><p align="justify">The letter asking doctors to appear before the committee on Monday said: &quot;Please bring your ITR, bank statement for the last three years, passport in original, as well as a set of photocopies of the said documents.&quot; The letter also warned that &quot;in case you fail to appear on the above said date and time, the ethics committee will proceed for ex parte decision against you on the basis of available records in the council office&quot;.</p><p align="justify">That had about 100 doctors thronging MCI's office. They were asked to give a response in writing. While many submitted their responses and documents immediately, others chose to wait and talk to their lawyers. &quot;The letter sent to us with a copy of the complaint did not include the details of the charges against us though the complaint did mention that it included details of charges against each doctor. Without knowing the exact allegation against us, how can we be expected to respond?&quot; said a doctor.</p><p align="justify">Dr Ajay Kumar, who chaired Monday's meeting, said, &quot;They have a week to respond. We did not want to reveal the exact allegations against them in the letters. But when they appeared today, the complaint against them was read out. Now they know the content of the complaint and they have been given a proforma to fill as response.&quot;</p><p align="justify">The anonymous complaint was received by the department of pharmaceuticals in August. &quot;The vigilance division of the department was of the view that since it involved such a large number of doctors, it ought to be examined in detail. So, they sent it to MCI in the first week of September, though anonymous complaints are usually disregarded,&quot; said Dr Aggarwal.</p><p align="justify">According to the complaint, one of the ways in which the firm would bribe doctors would be by paying lakhs of rupees for running advertisements on a TV installed in their clinics. The letter gave the name of each doctor with his or her address and the bribe given to him or her.</p><p align="justify">It alleged that the doctors were violating basic norms and claimed that the turnover of the company had grown from zero to Rs 400 crore in just five years. The letter alleged that company's brands were priced 15% to 30% higher than those of well-established companies like Cipla, Ranbaxy, Sun, Aristo, Alkem, Zydus and Cadila but still doctors were prescribing its products as the company &quot;was buying doctors by way of offering various means of bribes&quot;.</p><p align="justify">The complainant claimed that the firm was adding the cost of bribes to its products, forcing the patient to pay up. The complainant sought an I-T probe since doctors who allegedly accepted these bribes were evading income tax. </p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 26535, 'title' => '300 doctors under Medical Council of India lens over graft charge -Rema Nagarajan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India </div> <p align="justify"> The Medical Council of India has summoned about 300 doctors from across the country to Delhi to answer questions on an anonymous complaint that they had been bribed by a pharmaceutical firm. About 100 of these doctors appeared before MCI's ethics committee on Monday. </p> <p align="justify"> According to the complaint, the Ahmedabad-based pharma company has been paying doctors lakhs of rupees as well as gifting them cars and flats and sponsoring family foreign trips in return for prescribing its medicines even though cheaper alternatives from better known companies are available. </p> <p align="justify"> Of the 150 doctors summoned to appear at the last meeting of the ethics committee, 109 appeared. The rest were summoned on Monday. &quot;About 135 are left and they have been asked to appear at the next meeting of the committee in December. According to the rules, they have to be given three chances,&quot; explained Dr KK Aggarwal, a member of the panel. </p> <p align="justify"> The letter asking doctors to appear before the committee on Monday said: &quot;Please bring your ITR, bank statement for the last three years, passport in original, as well as a set of photocopies of the said documents.&quot; The letter also warned that &quot;in case you fail to appear on the above said date and time, the ethics committee will proceed for ex parte decision against you on the basis of available records in the council office&quot;. </p> <p align="justify"> That had about 100 doctors thronging MCI's office. They were asked to give a response in writing. While many submitted their responses and documents immediately, others chose to wait and talk to their lawyers. &quot;The letter sent to us with a copy of the complaint did not include the details of the charges against us though the complaint did mention that it included details of charges against each doctor. Without knowing the exact allegation against us, how can we be expected to respond?&quot; said a doctor. </p> <p align="justify"> Dr Ajay Kumar, who chaired Monday's meeting, said, &quot;They have a week to respond. We did not want to reveal the exact allegations against them in the letters. But when they appeared today, the complaint against them was read out. Now they know the content of the complaint and they have been given a proforma to fill as response.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> The anonymous complaint was received by the department of pharmaceuticals in August. &quot;The vigilance division of the department was of the view that since it involved such a large number of doctors, it ought to be examined in detail. So, they sent it to MCI in the first week of September, though anonymous complaints are usually disregarded,&quot; said Dr Aggarwal. </p> <p align="justify"> According to the complaint, one of the ways in which the firm would bribe doctors would be by paying lakhs of rupees for running advertisements on a TV installed in their clinics. The letter gave the name of each doctor with his or her address and the bribe given to him or her. </p> <p align="justify"> It alleged that the doctors were violating basic norms and claimed that the turnover of the company had grown from zero to Rs 400 crore in just five years. The letter alleged that company's brands were priced 15% to 30% higher than those of well-established companies like Cipla, Ranbaxy, Sun, Aristo, Alkem, Zydus and Cadila but still doctors were prescribing its products as the company &quot;was buying doctors by way of offering various means of bribes&quot;. </p> <p align="justify"> The complainant claimed that the firm was adding the cost of bribes to its products, forcing the patient to pay up. The complainant sought an I-T probe since doctors who allegedly accepted these bribes were evading income tax. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 18 November, 2014, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/300-doctors-under-Medical-Council-of-India-lens-over-graft-charge/articleshow/45183105.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => '300-doctors-under-medical-council-of-india-lens-over-graft-charge-rema-nagarajan-4674573', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4674573, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 5 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 6 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 26535 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 300 doctors under Medical Council of India lens over graft charge -Rema Nagarajan' $metaKeywords = 'Access to Healthcare,Graft,Corruption,doctors,Medical Council of India,MCI,Health' $metaDesc = ' -The Times of India The Medical Council of India has summoned about 300 doctors from across the country to Delhi to answer questions on an anonymous complaint that they had been bribed by a pharmaceutical firm. About 100 of these doctors...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify">The Medical Council of India has summoned about 300 doctors from across the country to Delhi to answer questions on an anonymous complaint that they had been bribed by a pharmaceutical firm. About 100 of these doctors appeared before MCI's ethics committee on Monday.</p><p align="justify">According to the complaint, the Ahmedabad-based pharma company has been paying doctors lakhs of rupees as well as gifting them cars and flats and sponsoring family foreign trips in return for prescribing its medicines even though cheaper alternatives from better known companies are available.</p><p align="justify">Of the 150 doctors summoned to appear at the last meeting of the ethics committee, 109 appeared. The rest were summoned on Monday. &quot;About 135 are left and they have been asked to appear at the next meeting of the committee in December. According to the rules, they have to be given three chances,&quot; explained Dr KK Aggarwal, a member of the panel.</p><p align="justify">The letter asking doctors to appear before the committee on Monday said: &quot;Please bring your ITR, bank statement for the last three years, passport in original, as well as a set of photocopies of the said documents.&quot; The letter also warned that &quot;in case you fail to appear on the above said date and time, the ethics committee will proceed for ex parte decision against you on the basis of available records in the council office&quot;.</p><p align="justify">That had about 100 doctors thronging MCI's office. They were asked to give a response in writing. While many submitted their responses and documents immediately, others chose to wait and talk to their lawyers. &quot;The letter sent to us with a copy of the complaint did not include the details of the charges against us though the complaint did mention that it included details of charges against each doctor. Without knowing the exact allegation against us, how can we be expected to respond?&quot; said a doctor.</p><p align="justify">Dr Ajay Kumar, who chaired Monday's meeting, said, &quot;They have a week to respond. We did not want to reveal the exact allegations against them in the letters. But when they appeared today, the complaint against them was read out. Now they know the content of the complaint and they have been given a proforma to fill as response.&quot;</p><p align="justify">The anonymous complaint was received by the department of pharmaceuticals in August. &quot;The vigilance division of the department was of the view that since it involved such a large number of doctors, it ought to be examined in detail. So, they sent it to MCI in the first week of September, though anonymous complaints are usually disregarded,&quot; said Dr Aggarwal.</p><p align="justify">According to the complaint, one of the ways in which the firm would bribe doctors would be by paying lakhs of rupees for running advertisements on a TV installed in their clinics. The letter gave the name of each doctor with his or her address and the bribe given to him or her.</p><p align="justify">It alleged that the doctors were violating basic norms and claimed that the turnover of the company had grown from zero to Rs 400 crore in just five years. The letter alleged that company's brands were priced 15% to 30% higher than those of well-established companies like Cipla, Ranbaxy, Sun, Aristo, Alkem, Zydus and Cadila but still doctors were prescribing its products as the company &quot;was buying doctors by way of offering various means of bribes&quot;.</p><p align="justify">The complainant claimed that the firm was adding the cost of bribes to its products, forcing the patient to pay up. The complainant sought an I-T probe since doctors who allegedly accepted these bribes were evading income tax. </p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/300-doctors-under-medical-council-of-india-lens-over-graft-charge-rema-nagarajan-4674573.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 300 doctors under Medical Council of India lens over graft charge -Rema Nagarajan | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Times of India The Medical Council of India has summoned about 300 doctors from across the country to Delhi to answer questions on an anonymous complaint that they had been bribed by a pharmaceutical firm. About 100 of these doctors..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>300 doctors under Medical Council of India lens over graft charge -Rema Nagarajan</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify">The Medical Council of India has summoned about 300 doctors from across the country to Delhi to answer questions on an anonymous complaint that they had been bribed by a pharmaceutical firm. About 100 of these doctors appeared before MCI's ethics committee on Monday.</p><p align="justify">According to the complaint, the Ahmedabad-based pharma company has been paying doctors lakhs of rupees as well as gifting them cars and flats and sponsoring family foreign trips in return for prescribing its medicines even though cheaper alternatives from better known companies are available.</p><p align="justify">Of the 150 doctors summoned to appear at the last meeting of the ethics committee, 109 appeared. The rest were summoned on Monday. "About 135 are left and they have been asked to appear at the next meeting of the committee in December. According to the rules, they have to be given three chances," explained Dr KK Aggarwal, a member of the panel.</p><p align="justify">The letter asking doctors to appear before the committee on Monday said: "Please bring your ITR, bank statement for the last three years, passport in original, as well as a set of photocopies of the said documents." The letter also warned that "in case you fail to appear on the above said date and time, the ethics committee will proceed for ex parte decision against you on the basis of available records in the council office".</p><p align="justify">That had about 100 doctors thronging MCI's office. They were asked to give a response in writing. While many submitted their responses and documents immediately, others chose to wait and talk to their lawyers. "The letter sent to us with a copy of the complaint did not include the details of the charges against us though the complaint did mention that it included details of charges against each doctor. Without knowing the exact allegation against us, how can we be expected to respond?" said a doctor.</p><p align="justify">Dr Ajay Kumar, who chaired Monday's meeting, said, "They have a week to respond. We did not want to reveal the exact allegations against them in the letters. But when they appeared today, the complaint against them was read out. Now they know the content of the complaint and they have been given a proforma to fill as response."</p><p align="justify">The anonymous complaint was received by the department of pharmaceuticals in August. "The vigilance division of the department was of the view that since it involved such a large number of doctors, it ought to be examined in detail. So, they sent it to MCI in the first week of September, though anonymous complaints are usually disregarded," said Dr Aggarwal.</p><p align="justify">According to the complaint, one of the ways in which the firm would bribe doctors would be by paying lakhs of rupees for running advertisements on a TV installed in their clinics. The letter gave the name of each doctor with his or her address and the bribe given to him or her.</p><p align="justify">It alleged that the doctors were violating basic norms and claimed that the turnover of the company had grown from zero to Rs 400 crore in just five years. The letter alleged that company's brands were priced 15% to 30% higher than those of well-established companies like Cipla, Ranbaxy, Sun, Aristo, Alkem, Zydus and Cadila but still doctors were prescribing its products as the company "was buying doctors by way of offering various means of bribes".</p><p align="justify">The complainant claimed that the firm was adding the cost of bribes to its products, forcing the patient to pay up. The complainant sought an I-T probe since doctors who allegedly accepted these bribes were evading income tax. </p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 26535, 'title' => '300 doctors under Medical Council of India lens over graft charge -Rema Nagarajan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India </div> <p align="justify"> The Medical Council of India has summoned about 300 doctors from across the country to Delhi to answer questions on an anonymous complaint that they had been bribed by a pharmaceutical firm. About 100 of these doctors appeared before MCI's ethics committee on Monday. </p> <p align="justify"> According to the complaint, the Ahmedabad-based pharma company has been paying doctors lakhs of rupees as well as gifting them cars and flats and sponsoring family foreign trips in return for prescribing its medicines even though cheaper alternatives from better known companies are available. </p> <p align="justify"> Of the 150 doctors summoned to appear at the last meeting of the ethics committee, 109 appeared. The rest were summoned on Monday. "About 135 are left and they have been asked to appear at the next meeting of the committee in December. According to the rules, they have to be given three chances," explained Dr KK Aggarwal, a member of the panel. </p> <p align="justify"> The letter asking doctors to appear before the committee on Monday said: "Please bring your ITR, bank statement for the last three years, passport in original, as well as a set of photocopies of the said documents." The letter also warned that "in case you fail to appear on the above said date and time, the ethics committee will proceed for ex parte decision against you on the basis of available records in the council office". </p> <p align="justify"> That had about 100 doctors thronging MCI's office. They were asked to give a response in writing. While many submitted their responses and documents immediately, others chose to wait and talk to their lawyers. "The letter sent to us with a copy of the complaint did not include the details of the charges against us though the complaint did mention that it included details of charges against each doctor. Without knowing the exact allegation against us, how can we be expected to respond?" said a doctor. </p> <p align="justify"> Dr Ajay Kumar, who chaired Monday's meeting, said, "They have a week to respond. We did not want to reveal the exact allegations against them in the letters. But when they appeared today, the complaint against them was read out. Now they know the content of the complaint and they have been given a proforma to fill as response." </p> <p align="justify"> The anonymous complaint was received by the department of pharmaceuticals in August. "The vigilance division of the department was of the view that since it involved such a large number of doctors, it ought to be examined in detail. So, they sent it to MCI in the first week of September, though anonymous complaints are usually disregarded," said Dr Aggarwal. </p> <p align="justify"> According to the complaint, one of the ways in which the firm would bribe doctors would be by paying lakhs of rupees for running advertisements on a TV installed in their clinics. The letter gave the name of each doctor with his or her address and the bribe given to him or her. </p> <p align="justify"> It alleged that the doctors were violating basic norms and claimed that the turnover of the company had grown from zero to Rs 400 crore in just five years. The letter alleged that company's brands were priced 15% to 30% higher than those of well-established companies like Cipla, Ranbaxy, Sun, Aristo, Alkem, Zydus and Cadila but still doctors were prescribing its products as the company "was buying doctors by way of offering various means of bribes". </p> <p align="justify"> The complainant claimed that the firm was adding the cost of bribes to its products, forcing the patient to pay up. The complainant sought an I-T probe since doctors who allegedly accepted these bribes were evading income tax. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 18 November, 2014, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/300-doctors-under-Medical-Council-of-India-lens-over-graft-charge/articleshow/45183105.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => '300-doctors-under-medical-council-of-india-lens-over-graft-charge-rema-nagarajan-4674573', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4674573, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 26535, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 300 doctors under Medical Council of India lens over graft charge -Rema Nagarajan', 'metaKeywords' => 'Access to Healthcare,Graft,Corruption,doctors,Medical Council of India,MCI,Health', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Times of India The Medical Council of India has summoned about 300 doctors from across the country to Delhi to answer questions on an anonymous complaint that they had been bribed by a pharmaceutical firm. About 100 of these doctors...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify">The Medical Council of India has summoned about 300 doctors from across the country to Delhi to answer questions on an anonymous complaint that they had been bribed by a pharmaceutical firm. About 100 of these doctors appeared before MCI's ethics committee on Monday.</p><p align="justify">According to the complaint, the Ahmedabad-based pharma company has been paying doctors lakhs of rupees as well as gifting them cars and flats and sponsoring family foreign trips in return for prescribing its medicines even though cheaper alternatives from better known companies are available.</p><p align="justify">Of the 150 doctors summoned to appear at the last meeting of the ethics committee, 109 appeared. The rest were summoned on Monday. "About 135 are left and they have been asked to appear at the next meeting of the committee in December. According to the rules, they have to be given three chances," explained Dr KK Aggarwal, a member of the panel.</p><p align="justify">The letter asking doctors to appear before the committee on Monday said: "Please bring your ITR, bank statement for the last three years, passport in original, as well as a set of photocopies of the said documents." The letter also warned that "in case you fail to appear on the above said date and time, the ethics committee will proceed for ex parte decision against you on the basis of available records in the council office".</p><p align="justify">That had about 100 doctors thronging MCI's office. They were asked to give a response in writing. While many submitted their responses and documents immediately, others chose to wait and talk to their lawyers. "The letter sent to us with a copy of the complaint did not include the details of the charges against us though the complaint did mention that it included details of charges against each doctor. Without knowing the exact allegation against us, how can we be expected to respond?" said a doctor.</p><p align="justify">Dr Ajay Kumar, who chaired Monday's meeting, said, "They have a week to respond. We did not want to reveal the exact allegations against them in the letters. But when they appeared today, the complaint against them was read out. Now they know the content of the complaint and they have been given a proforma to fill as response."</p><p align="justify">The anonymous complaint was received by the department of pharmaceuticals in August. "The vigilance division of the department was of the view that since it involved such a large number of doctors, it ought to be examined in detail. So, they sent it to MCI in the first week of September, though anonymous complaints are usually disregarded," said Dr Aggarwal.</p><p align="justify">According to the complaint, one of the ways in which the firm would bribe doctors would be by paying lakhs of rupees for running advertisements on a TV installed in their clinics. The letter gave the name of each doctor with his or her address and the bribe given to him or her.</p><p align="justify">It alleged that the doctors were violating basic norms and claimed that the turnover of the company had grown from zero to Rs 400 crore in just five years. The letter alleged that company's brands were priced 15% to 30% higher than those of well-established companies like Cipla, Ranbaxy, Sun, Aristo, Alkem, Zydus and Cadila but still doctors were prescribing its products as the company "was buying doctors by way of offering various means of bribes".</p><p align="justify">The complainant claimed that the firm was adding the cost of bribes to its products, forcing the patient to pay up. The complainant sought an I-T probe since doctors who allegedly accepted these bribes were evading income tax. </p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 26535, 'title' => '300 doctors under Medical Council of India lens over graft charge -Rema Nagarajan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India </div> <p align="justify"> The Medical Council of India has summoned about 300 doctors from across the country to Delhi to answer questions on an anonymous complaint that they had been bribed by a pharmaceutical firm. About 100 of these doctors appeared before MCI's ethics committee on Monday. </p> <p align="justify"> According to the complaint, the Ahmedabad-based pharma company has been paying doctors lakhs of rupees as well as gifting them cars and flats and sponsoring family foreign trips in return for prescribing its medicines even though cheaper alternatives from better known companies are available. </p> <p align="justify"> Of the 150 doctors summoned to appear at the last meeting of the ethics committee, 109 appeared. The rest were summoned on Monday. "About 135 are left and they have been asked to appear at the next meeting of the committee in December. According to the rules, they have to be given three chances," explained Dr KK Aggarwal, a member of the panel. </p> <p align="justify"> The letter asking doctors to appear before the committee on Monday said: "Please bring your ITR, bank statement for the last three years, passport in original, as well as a set of photocopies of the said documents." The letter also warned that "in case you fail to appear on the above said date and time, the ethics committee will proceed for ex parte decision against you on the basis of available records in the council office". </p> <p align="justify"> That had about 100 doctors thronging MCI's office. They were asked to give a response in writing. While many submitted their responses and documents immediately, others chose to wait and talk to their lawyers. "The letter sent to us with a copy of the complaint did not include the details of the charges against us though the complaint did mention that it included details of charges against each doctor. Without knowing the exact allegation against us, how can we be expected to respond?" said a doctor. </p> <p align="justify"> Dr Ajay Kumar, who chaired Monday's meeting, said, "They have a week to respond. We did not want to reveal the exact allegations against them in the letters. But when they appeared today, the complaint against them was read out. Now they know the content of the complaint and they have been given a proforma to fill as response." </p> <p align="justify"> The anonymous complaint was received by the department of pharmaceuticals in August. "The vigilance division of the department was of the view that since it involved such a large number of doctors, it ought to be examined in detail. So, they sent it to MCI in the first week of September, though anonymous complaints are usually disregarded," said Dr Aggarwal. </p> <p align="justify"> According to the complaint, one of the ways in which the firm would bribe doctors would be by paying lakhs of rupees for running advertisements on a TV installed in their clinics. The letter gave the name of each doctor with his or her address and the bribe given to him or her. </p> <p align="justify"> It alleged that the doctors were violating basic norms and claimed that the turnover of the company had grown from zero to Rs 400 crore in just five years. The letter alleged that company's brands were priced 15% to 30% higher than those of well-established companies like Cipla, Ranbaxy, Sun, Aristo, Alkem, Zydus and Cadila but still doctors were prescribing its products as the company "was buying doctors by way of offering various means of bribes". </p> <p align="justify"> The complainant claimed that the firm was adding the cost of bribes to its products, forcing the patient to pay up. The complainant sought an I-T probe since doctors who allegedly accepted these bribes were evading income tax. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 18 November, 2014, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/300-doctors-under-Medical-Council-of-India-lens-over-graft-charge/articleshow/45183105.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => '300-doctors-under-medical-council-of-india-lens-over-graft-charge-rema-nagarajan-4674573', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4674573, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 5 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 6 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 26535 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 300 doctors under Medical Council of India lens over graft charge -Rema Nagarajan' $metaKeywords = 'Access to Healthcare,Graft,Corruption,doctors,Medical Council of India,MCI,Health' $metaDesc = ' -The Times of India The Medical Council of India has summoned about 300 doctors from across the country to Delhi to answer questions on an anonymous complaint that they had been bribed by a pharmaceutical firm. About 100 of these doctors...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify">The Medical Council of India has summoned about 300 doctors from across the country to Delhi to answer questions on an anonymous complaint that they had been bribed by a pharmaceutical firm. About 100 of these doctors appeared before MCI's ethics committee on Monday.</p><p align="justify">According to the complaint, the Ahmedabad-based pharma company has been paying doctors lakhs of rupees as well as gifting them cars and flats and sponsoring family foreign trips in return for prescribing its medicines even though cheaper alternatives from better known companies are available.</p><p align="justify">Of the 150 doctors summoned to appear at the last meeting of the ethics committee, 109 appeared. The rest were summoned on Monday. "About 135 are left and they have been asked to appear at the next meeting of the committee in December. According to the rules, they have to be given three chances," explained Dr KK Aggarwal, a member of the panel.</p><p align="justify">The letter asking doctors to appear before the committee on Monday said: "Please bring your ITR, bank statement for the last three years, passport in original, as well as a set of photocopies of the said documents." The letter also warned that "in case you fail to appear on the above said date and time, the ethics committee will proceed for ex parte decision against you on the basis of available records in the council office".</p><p align="justify">That had about 100 doctors thronging MCI's office. They were asked to give a response in writing. While many submitted their responses and documents immediately, others chose to wait and talk to their lawyers. "The letter sent to us with a copy of the complaint did not include the details of the charges against us though the complaint did mention that it included details of charges against each doctor. Without knowing the exact allegation against us, how can we be expected to respond?" said a doctor.</p><p align="justify">Dr Ajay Kumar, who chaired Monday's meeting, said, "They have a week to respond. We did not want to reveal the exact allegations against them in the letters. But when they appeared today, the complaint against them was read out. Now they know the content of the complaint and they have been given a proforma to fill as response."</p><p align="justify">The anonymous complaint was received by the department of pharmaceuticals in August. "The vigilance division of the department was of the view that since it involved such a large number of doctors, it ought to be examined in detail. So, they sent it to MCI in the first week of September, though anonymous complaints are usually disregarded," said Dr Aggarwal.</p><p align="justify">According to the complaint, one of the ways in which the firm would bribe doctors would be by paying lakhs of rupees for running advertisements on a TV installed in their clinics. The letter gave the name of each doctor with his or her address and the bribe given to him or her.</p><p align="justify">It alleged that the doctors were violating basic norms and claimed that the turnover of the company had grown from zero to Rs 400 crore in just five years. The letter alleged that company's brands were priced 15% to 30% higher than those of well-established companies like Cipla, Ranbaxy, Sun, Aristo, Alkem, Zydus and Cadila but still doctors were prescribing its products as the company "was buying doctors by way of offering various means of bribes".</p><p align="justify">The complainant claimed that the firm was adding the cost of bribes to its products, forcing the patient to pay up. The complainant sought an I-T probe since doctors who allegedly accepted these bribes were evading income tax. </p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
300 doctors under Medical Council of India lens over graft charge -Rema Nagarajan |
-The Times of India The Medical Council of India has summoned about 300 doctors from across the country to Delhi to answer questions on an anonymous complaint that they had been bribed by a pharmaceutical firm. About 100 of these doctors appeared before MCI's ethics committee on Monday. According to the complaint, the Ahmedabad-based pharma company has been paying doctors lakhs of rupees as well as gifting them cars and flats and sponsoring family foreign trips in return for prescribing its medicines even though cheaper alternatives from better known companies are available. Of the 150 doctors summoned to appear at the last meeting of the ethics committee, 109 appeared. The rest were summoned on Monday. "About 135 are left and they have been asked to appear at the next meeting of the committee in December. According to the rules, they have to be given three chances," explained Dr KK Aggarwal, a member of the panel. The letter asking doctors to appear before the committee on Monday said: "Please bring your ITR, bank statement for the last three years, passport in original, as well as a set of photocopies of the said documents." The letter also warned that "in case you fail to appear on the above said date and time, the ethics committee will proceed for ex parte decision against you on the basis of available records in the council office". That had about 100 doctors thronging MCI's office. They were asked to give a response in writing. While many submitted their responses and documents immediately, others chose to wait and talk to their lawyers. "The letter sent to us with a copy of the complaint did not include the details of the charges against us though the complaint did mention that it included details of charges against each doctor. Without knowing the exact allegation against us, how can we be expected to respond?" said a doctor. Dr Ajay Kumar, who chaired Monday's meeting, said, "They have a week to respond. We did not want to reveal the exact allegations against them in the letters. But when they appeared today, the complaint against them was read out. Now they know the content of the complaint and they have been given a proforma to fill as response." The anonymous complaint was received by the department of pharmaceuticals in August. "The vigilance division of the department was of the view that since it involved such a large number of doctors, it ought to be examined in detail. So, they sent it to MCI in the first week of September, though anonymous complaints are usually disregarded," said Dr Aggarwal. According to the complaint, one of the ways in which the firm would bribe doctors would be by paying lakhs of rupees for running advertisements on a TV installed in their clinics. The letter gave the name of each doctor with his or her address and the bribe given to him or her. It alleged that the doctors were violating basic norms and claimed that the turnover of the company had grown from zero to Rs 400 crore in just five years. The letter alleged that company's brands were priced 15% to 30% higher than those of well-established companies like Cipla, Ranbaxy, Sun, Aristo, Alkem, Zydus and Cadila but still doctors were prescribing its products as the company "was buying doctors by way of offering various means of bribes". The complainant claimed that the firm was adding the cost of bribes to its products, forcing the patient to pay up. The complainant sought an I-T probe since doctors who allegedly accepted these bribes were evading income tax. |