Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
if (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {
'status' => (int) 200,
'contentType' => 'text/html',
'headers' => [
'Content-Type' => [
[maximum depth reached]
]
],
'file' => null,
'fileRange' => [],
'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
'cacheDirectives' => [],
'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680fb83b05e70-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680fb83b05e70-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680fb83b05e70-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680fb83b05e70-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680fb83b05e70-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680fb83b05e70-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680fb83b05e70-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680fb83b05e70-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">>
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/>
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/>
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680fb83b05e70-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 9286,
'title' => '4 previous lokpal bills had covered PM by Nagendar Sharma',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<br />
<div align="justify">
The government's decision to exclude the prime minister from the ambit of the lokpal contradicts the position taken by previous governments on this issue between 1989 and 2001, in their failed attempts to get the bill passed in Parliament. A look at the previous bills shows though the lokpal bill was introduced for the first time in Parliament in 1968, it was only in 1989, during the fifth unsuccessful attempt, that it proposed to cover the prime minister.<br />
<br />
This trend continued in the bills introduced in 1996, 1998 and 2001, shows the data compiled by the PRS Legislative Research service.<br />
<br />
&quot;The office of the prime minister was brought within the ambit of lokpal by the government headed by VP Singh through the 1989 bill. In subsequent bills, it was proposed to bring the prime minister in the purview of the lokpal,&quot; stated a parliamentary standing committee report of 2002, submitted by its then chairman Pranab Mukherjee.<br />
<br />
Interestingly, the bill introduced in Parliament during the late VP Singh's tenure, included his office but excluded MPs.<br />
<br />
The committee headed by Mukherjee had stated, &quot;Though the PM was first among equals&hellip; but given the general perception about the prevalence of corruption, making public representatives accountable would enhance the reputation of those holding high offices.&quot;&nbsp; The first and second lokpal bills in 1968 and 1971, had proposed setting-up of lokayuktas in states also.<br />
<br />
In the last four decades and eight attempts, the lokpal bill underwent many changes.<br />
<br />
The statement of objects and reasons for the bill introduced by the minister of state for personnel, V Narayansamy in the Lok Sabha on Thursday, stated: &quot;A need has been felt to constitute a mechanism for dealing with complaints on corruption against public functionaries in high places.&quot; <br />
</div>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Hindustan Times, 7 August, 2011, http://www.hindustantimes.com/4-previous-lokpal-bills-had-covered-PM/H1-Article1-730295.aspx',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => '4-previous-lokpal-bills-had-covered-pm-by-nagendar-sharma-9394',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 9394,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
},
'articleid' => (int) 9286,
'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 4 previous lokpal bills had covered PM by Nagendar Sharma',
'metaKeywords' => 'lokpal bill',
'metaDesc' => '
The government's decision to exclude the prime minister from the ambit of the lokpal contradicts the position taken by previous governments on this issue between 1989 and 2001, in their failed attempts to get the bill passed in Parliament. A...',
'disp' => '<br /><div align="justify">The government's decision to exclude the prime minister from the ambit of the lokpal contradicts the position taken by previous governments on this issue between 1989 and 2001, in their failed attempts to get the bill passed in Parliament. A look at the previous bills shows though the lokpal bill was introduced for the first time in Parliament in 1968, it was only in 1989, during the fifth unsuccessful attempt, that it proposed to cover the prime minister.<br /><br />This trend continued in the bills introduced in 1996, 1998 and 2001, shows the data compiled by the PRS Legislative Research service.<br /><br />&quot;The office of the prime minister was brought within the ambit of lokpal by the government headed by VP Singh through the 1989 bill. In subsequent bills, it was proposed to bring the prime minister in the purview of the lokpal,&quot; stated a parliamentary standing committee report of 2002, submitted by its then chairman Pranab Mukherjee.<br /><br />Interestingly, the bill introduced in Parliament during the late VP Singh's tenure, included his office but excluded MPs.<br /><br />The committee headed by Mukherjee had stated, &quot;Though the PM was first among equals&hellip; but given the general perception about the prevalence of corruption, making public representatives accountable would enhance the reputation of those holding high offices.&quot;&nbsp; The first and second lokpal bills in 1968 and 1971, had proposed setting-up of lokayuktas in states also.<br /><br />In the last four decades and eight attempts, the lokpal bill underwent many changes.<br /><br />The statement of objects and reasons for the bill introduced by the minister of state for personnel, V Narayansamy in the Lok Sabha on Thursday, stated: &quot;A need has been felt to constitute a mechanism for dealing with complaints on corruption against public functionaries in high places.&quot; <br /></div>',
'lang' => 'English',
'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
'site_title' => 'im4change',
'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 9286,
'title' => '4 previous lokpal bills had covered PM by Nagendar Sharma',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<br />
<div align="justify">
The government's decision to exclude the prime minister from the ambit of the lokpal contradicts the position taken by previous governments on this issue between 1989 and 2001, in their failed attempts to get the bill passed in Parliament. A look at the previous bills shows though the lokpal bill was introduced for the first time in Parliament in 1968, it was only in 1989, during the fifth unsuccessful attempt, that it proposed to cover the prime minister.<br />
<br />
This trend continued in the bills introduced in 1996, 1998 and 2001, shows the data compiled by the PRS Legislative Research service.<br />
<br />
&quot;The office of the prime minister was brought within the ambit of lokpal by the government headed by VP Singh through the 1989 bill. In subsequent bills, it was proposed to bring the prime minister in the purview of the lokpal,&quot; stated a parliamentary standing committee report of 2002, submitted by its then chairman Pranab Mukherjee.<br />
<br />
Interestingly, the bill introduced in Parliament during the late VP Singh's tenure, included his office but excluded MPs.<br />
<br />
The committee headed by Mukherjee had stated, &quot;Though the PM was first among equals&hellip; but given the general perception about the prevalence of corruption, making public representatives accountable would enhance the reputation of those holding high offices.&quot;&nbsp; The first and second lokpal bills in 1968 and 1971, had proposed setting-up of lokayuktas in states also.<br />
<br />
In the last four decades and eight attempts, the lokpal bill underwent many changes.<br />
<br />
The statement of objects and reasons for the bill introduced by the minister of state for personnel, V Narayansamy in the Lok Sabha on Thursday, stated: &quot;A need has been felt to constitute a mechanism for dealing with complaints on corruption against public functionaries in high places.&quot; <br />
</div>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Hindustan Times, 7 August, 2011, http://www.hindustantimes.com/4-previous-lokpal-bills-had-covered-PM/H1-Article1-730295.aspx',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => '4-previous-lokpal-bills-had-covered-pm-by-nagendar-sharma-9394',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 9394,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
'*' => true,
'id' => false
],
'[dirty]' => [],
'[original]' => [],
'[virtual]' => [],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [],
'[invalid]' => [],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
}
$articleid = (int) 9286
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 4 previous lokpal bills had covered PM by Nagendar Sharma'
$metaKeywords = 'lokpal bill'
$metaDesc = '
The government's decision to exclude the prime minister from the ambit of the lokpal contradicts the position taken by previous governments on this issue between 1989 and 2001, in their failed attempts to get the bill passed in Parliament. A...'
$disp = '<br /><div align="justify">The government's decision to exclude the prime minister from the ambit of the lokpal contradicts the position taken by previous governments on this issue between 1989 and 2001, in their failed attempts to get the bill passed in Parliament. A look at the previous bills shows though the lokpal bill was introduced for the first time in Parliament in 1968, it was only in 1989, during the fifth unsuccessful attempt, that it proposed to cover the prime minister.<br /><br />This trend continued in the bills introduced in 1996, 1998 and 2001, shows the data compiled by the PRS Legislative Research service.<br /><br />&quot;The office of the prime minister was brought within the ambit of lokpal by the government headed by VP Singh through the 1989 bill. In subsequent bills, it was proposed to bring the prime minister in the purview of the lokpal,&quot; stated a parliamentary standing committee report of 2002, submitted by its then chairman Pranab Mukherjee.<br /><br />Interestingly, the bill introduced in Parliament during the late VP Singh's tenure, included his office but excluded MPs.<br /><br />The committee headed by Mukherjee had stated, &quot;Though the PM was first among equals&hellip; but given the general perception about the prevalence of corruption, making public representatives accountable would enhance the reputation of those holding high offices.&quot;&nbsp; The first and second lokpal bills in 1968 and 1971, had proposed setting-up of lokayuktas in states also.<br /><br />In the last four decades and eight attempts, the lokpal bill underwent many changes.<br /><br />The statement of objects and reasons for the bill introduced by the minister of state for personnel, V Narayansamy in the Lok Sabha on Thursday, stated: &quot;A need has been felt to constitute a mechanism for dealing with complaints on corruption against public functionaries in high places.&quot; <br /></div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/4-previous-lokpal-bills-had-covered-pm-by-nagendar-sharma-9394.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
<link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
media="all"/>
<title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 4 previous lokpal bills had covered PM by Nagendar Sharma | Im4change.org</title>
<meta name="description" content="
The government's decision to exclude the prime minister from the ambit of the lokpal contradicts the position taken by previous governments on this issue between 1989 and 2001, in their failed attempts to get the bill passed in Parliament. A..."/>
<script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
<script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">
$(document).ready(function () {
var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
$("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
.attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
.load(function () {
pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not
pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
});
});
</script>
<style type="text/css">
@media screen {
div.divFooter {
display: block;
}
}
@media print {
.printbutton {
display: none !important;
}
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
<tr>
<td class="top_bg">
<div class="divFooter">
<img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="topspace"> </td>
</tr>
<tr id="topspace">
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%">
<h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
<strong>4 previous lokpal bills had covered PM by Nagendar Sharma</strong></h1>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
<br /><div align="justify">The government's decision to exclude the prime minister from the ambit of the lokpal contradicts the position taken by previous governments on this issue between 1989 and 2001, in their failed attempts to get the bill passed in Parliament. A look at the previous bills shows though the lokpal bill was introduced for the first time in Parliament in 1968, it was only in 1989, during the fifth unsuccessful attempt, that it proposed to cover the prime minister.<br /><br />This trend continued in the bills introduced in 1996, 1998 and 2001, shows the data compiled by the PRS Legislative Research service.<br /><br />"The office of the prime minister was brought within the ambit of lokpal by the government headed by VP Singh through the 1989 bill. In subsequent bills, it was proposed to bring the prime minister in the purview of the lokpal," stated a parliamentary standing committee report of 2002, submitted by its then chairman Pranab Mukherjee.<br /><br />Interestingly, the bill introduced in Parliament during the late VP Singh's tenure, included his office but excluded MPs.<br /><br />The committee headed by Mukherjee had stated, "Though the PM was first among equals… but given the general perception about the prevalence of corruption, making public representatives accountable would enhance the reputation of those holding high offices." The first and second lokpal bills in 1968 and 1971, had proposed setting-up of lokayuktas in states also.<br /><br />In the last four decades and eight attempts, the lokpal bill underwent many changes.<br /><br />The statement of objects and reasons for the bill introduced by the minister of state for personnel, V Narayansamy in the Lok Sabha on Thursday, stated: "A need has been felt to constitute a mechanism for dealing with complaints on corruption against public functionaries in high places." <br /></div> </font>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
</table></body>
</html>'
}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {
'status' => (int) 200,
'contentType' => 'text/html',
'headers' => [
'Content-Type' => [
[maximum depth reached]
]
],
'file' => null,
'fileRange' => [],
'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
'cacheDirectives' => [],
'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680fb83b05e70-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680fb83b05e70-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680fb83b05e70-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680fb83b05e70-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680fb83b05e70-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680fb83b05e70-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680fb83b05e70-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680fb83b05e70-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">>
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/>
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/>
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680fb83b05e70-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 9286,
'title' => '4 previous lokpal bills had covered PM by Nagendar Sharma',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<br />
<div align="justify">
The government's decision to exclude the prime minister from the ambit of the lokpal contradicts the position taken by previous governments on this issue between 1989 and 2001, in their failed attempts to get the bill passed in Parliament. A look at the previous bills shows though the lokpal bill was introduced for the first time in Parliament in 1968, it was only in 1989, during the fifth unsuccessful attempt, that it proposed to cover the prime minister.<br />
<br />
This trend continued in the bills introduced in 1996, 1998 and 2001, shows the data compiled by the PRS Legislative Research service.<br />
<br />
&quot;The office of the prime minister was brought within the ambit of lokpal by the government headed by VP Singh through the 1989 bill. In subsequent bills, it was proposed to bring the prime minister in the purview of the lokpal,&quot; stated a parliamentary standing committee report of 2002, submitted by its then chairman Pranab Mukherjee.<br />
<br />
Interestingly, the bill introduced in Parliament during the late VP Singh's tenure, included his office but excluded MPs.<br />
<br />
The committee headed by Mukherjee had stated, &quot;Though the PM was first among equals&hellip; but given the general perception about the prevalence of corruption, making public representatives accountable would enhance the reputation of those holding high offices.&quot;&nbsp; The first and second lokpal bills in 1968 and 1971, had proposed setting-up of lokayuktas in states also.<br />
<br />
In the last four decades and eight attempts, the lokpal bill underwent many changes.<br />
<br />
The statement of objects and reasons for the bill introduced by the minister of state for personnel, V Narayansamy in the Lok Sabha on Thursday, stated: &quot;A need has been felt to constitute a mechanism for dealing with complaints on corruption against public functionaries in high places.&quot; <br />
</div>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Hindustan Times, 7 August, 2011, http://www.hindustantimes.com/4-previous-lokpal-bills-had-covered-PM/H1-Article1-730295.aspx',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => '4-previous-lokpal-bills-had-covered-pm-by-nagendar-sharma-9394',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 9394,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
},
'articleid' => (int) 9286,
'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 4 previous lokpal bills had covered PM by Nagendar Sharma',
'metaKeywords' => 'lokpal bill',
'metaDesc' => '
The government's decision to exclude the prime minister from the ambit of the lokpal contradicts the position taken by previous governments on this issue between 1989 and 2001, in their failed attempts to get the bill passed in Parliament. A...',
'disp' => '<br /><div align="justify">The government's decision to exclude the prime minister from the ambit of the lokpal contradicts the position taken by previous governments on this issue between 1989 and 2001, in their failed attempts to get the bill passed in Parliament. A look at the previous bills shows though the lokpal bill was introduced for the first time in Parliament in 1968, it was only in 1989, during the fifth unsuccessful attempt, that it proposed to cover the prime minister.<br /><br />This trend continued in the bills introduced in 1996, 1998 and 2001, shows the data compiled by the PRS Legislative Research service.<br /><br />&quot;The office of the prime minister was brought within the ambit of lokpal by the government headed by VP Singh through the 1989 bill. In subsequent bills, it was proposed to bring the prime minister in the purview of the lokpal,&quot; stated a parliamentary standing committee report of 2002, submitted by its then chairman Pranab Mukherjee.<br /><br />Interestingly, the bill introduced in Parliament during the late VP Singh's tenure, included his office but excluded MPs.<br /><br />The committee headed by Mukherjee had stated, &quot;Though the PM was first among equals&hellip; but given the general perception about the prevalence of corruption, making public representatives accountable would enhance the reputation of those holding high offices.&quot;&nbsp; The first and second lokpal bills in 1968 and 1971, had proposed setting-up of lokayuktas in states also.<br /><br />In the last four decades and eight attempts, the lokpal bill underwent many changes.<br /><br />The statement of objects and reasons for the bill introduced by the minister of state for personnel, V Narayansamy in the Lok Sabha on Thursday, stated: &quot;A need has been felt to constitute a mechanism for dealing with complaints on corruption against public functionaries in high places.&quot; <br /></div>',
'lang' => 'English',
'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
'site_title' => 'im4change',
'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 9286,
'title' => '4 previous lokpal bills had covered PM by Nagendar Sharma',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<br />
<div align="justify">
The government's decision to exclude the prime minister from the ambit of the lokpal contradicts the position taken by previous governments on this issue between 1989 and 2001, in their failed attempts to get the bill passed in Parliament. A look at the previous bills shows though the lokpal bill was introduced for the first time in Parliament in 1968, it was only in 1989, during the fifth unsuccessful attempt, that it proposed to cover the prime minister.<br />
<br />
This trend continued in the bills introduced in 1996, 1998 and 2001, shows the data compiled by the PRS Legislative Research service.<br />
<br />
&quot;The office of the prime minister was brought within the ambit of lokpal by the government headed by VP Singh through the 1989 bill. In subsequent bills, it was proposed to bring the prime minister in the purview of the lokpal,&quot; stated a parliamentary standing committee report of 2002, submitted by its then chairman Pranab Mukherjee.<br />
<br />
Interestingly, the bill introduced in Parliament during the late VP Singh's tenure, included his office but excluded MPs.<br />
<br />
The committee headed by Mukherjee had stated, &quot;Though the PM was first among equals&hellip; but given the general perception about the prevalence of corruption, making public representatives accountable would enhance the reputation of those holding high offices.&quot;&nbsp; The first and second lokpal bills in 1968 and 1971, had proposed setting-up of lokayuktas in states also.<br />
<br />
In the last four decades and eight attempts, the lokpal bill underwent many changes.<br />
<br />
The statement of objects and reasons for the bill introduced by the minister of state for personnel, V Narayansamy in the Lok Sabha on Thursday, stated: &quot;A need has been felt to constitute a mechanism for dealing with complaints on corruption against public functionaries in high places.&quot; <br />
</div>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Hindustan Times, 7 August, 2011, http://www.hindustantimes.com/4-previous-lokpal-bills-had-covered-PM/H1-Article1-730295.aspx',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => '4-previous-lokpal-bills-had-covered-pm-by-nagendar-sharma-9394',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 9394,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
'*' => true,
'id' => false
],
'[dirty]' => [],
'[original]' => [],
'[virtual]' => [],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [],
'[invalid]' => [],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
}
$articleid = (int) 9286
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 4 previous lokpal bills had covered PM by Nagendar Sharma'
$metaKeywords = 'lokpal bill'
$metaDesc = '
The government's decision to exclude the prime minister from the ambit of the lokpal contradicts the position taken by previous governments on this issue between 1989 and 2001, in their failed attempts to get the bill passed in Parliament. A...'
$disp = '<br /><div align="justify">The government's decision to exclude the prime minister from the ambit of the lokpal contradicts the position taken by previous governments on this issue between 1989 and 2001, in their failed attempts to get the bill passed in Parliament. A look at the previous bills shows though the lokpal bill was introduced for the first time in Parliament in 1968, it was only in 1989, during the fifth unsuccessful attempt, that it proposed to cover the prime minister.<br /><br />This trend continued in the bills introduced in 1996, 1998 and 2001, shows the data compiled by the PRS Legislative Research service.<br /><br />&quot;The office of the prime minister was brought within the ambit of lokpal by the government headed by VP Singh through the 1989 bill. In subsequent bills, it was proposed to bring the prime minister in the purview of the lokpal,&quot; stated a parliamentary standing committee report of 2002, submitted by its then chairman Pranab Mukherjee.<br /><br />Interestingly, the bill introduced in Parliament during the late VP Singh's tenure, included his office but excluded MPs.<br /><br />The committee headed by Mukherjee had stated, &quot;Though the PM was first among equals&hellip; but given the general perception about the prevalence of corruption, making public representatives accountable would enhance the reputation of those holding high offices.&quot;&nbsp; The first and second lokpal bills in 1968 and 1971, had proposed setting-up of lokayuktas in states also.<br /><br />In the last four decades and eight attempts, the lokpal bill underwent many changes.<br /><br />The statement of objects and reasons for the bill introduced by the minister of state for personnel, V Narayansamy in the Lok Sabha on Thursday, stated: &quot;A need has been felt to constitute a mechanism for dealing with complaints on corruption against public functionaries in high places.&quot; <br /></div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/4-previous-lokpal-bills-had-covered-pm-by-nagendar-sharma-9394.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
<link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
media="all"/>
<title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 4 previous lokpal bills had covered PM by Nagendar Sharma | Im4change.org</title>
<meta name="description" content="
The government's decision to exclude the prime minister from the ambit of the lokpal contradicts the position taken by previous governments on this issue between 1989 and 2001, in their failed attempts to get the bill passed in Parliament. A..."/>
<script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
<script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">
$(document).ready(function () {
var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
$("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
.attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
.load(function () {
pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not
pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
});
});
</script>
<style type="text/css">
@media screen {
div.divFooter {
display: block;
}
}
@media print {
.printbutton {
display: none !important;
}
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
<tr>
<td class="top_bg">
<div class="divFooter">
<img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="topspace"> </td>
</tr>
<tr id="topspace">
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%">
<h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
<strong>4 previous lokpal bills had covered PM by Nagendar Sharma</strong></h1>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
<br /><div align="justify">The government's decision to exclude the prime minister from the ambit of the lokpal contradicts the position taken by previous governments on this issue between 1989 and 2001, in their failed attempts to get the bill passed in Parliament. A look at the previous bills shows though the lokpal bill was introduced for the first time in Parliament in 1968, it was only in 1989, during the fifth unsuccessful attempt, that it proposed to cover the prime minister.<br /><br />This trend continued in the bills introduced in 1996, 1998 and 2001, shows the data compiled by the PRS Legislative Research service.<br /><br />"The office of the prime minister was brought within the ambit of lokpal by the government headed by VP Singh through the 1989 bill. In subsequent bills, it was proposed to bring the prime minister in the purview of the lokpal," stated a parliamentary standing committee report of 2002, submitted by its then chairman Pranab Mukherjee.<br /><br />Interestingly, the bill introduced in Parliament during the late VP Singh's tenure, included his office but excluded MPs.<br /><br />The committee headed by Mukherjee had stated, "Though the PM was first among equals… but given the general perception about the prevalence of corruption, making public representatives accountable would enhance the reputation of those holding high offices." The first and second lokpal bills in 1968 and 1971, had proposed setting-up of lokayuktas in states also.<br /><br />In the last four decades and eight attempts, the lokpal bill underwent many changes.<br /><br />The statement of objects and reasons for the bill introduced by the minister of state for personnel, V Narayansamy in the Lok Sabha on Thursday, stated: "A need has been felt to constitute a mechanism for dealing with complaints on corruption against public functionaries in high places." <br /></div> </font>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
</table></body>
</html>'
}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {
'status' => (int) 200,
'contentType' => 'text/html',
'headers' => [
'Content-Type' => [
[maximum depth reached]
]
],
'file' => null,
'fileRange' => [],
'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
'cacheDirectives' => [],
'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680fb83b05e70-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680fb83b05e70-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680fb83b05e70-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680fb83b05e70-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680fb83b05e70-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680fb83b05e70-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680fb83b05e70-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680fb83b05e70-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">>
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/>
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/>
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680fb83b05e70-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 9286,
'title' => '4 previous lokpal bills had covered PM by Nagendar Sharma',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<br />
<div align="justify">
The government's decision to exclude the prime minister from the ambit of the lokpal contradicts the position taken by previous governments on this issue between 1989 and 2001, in their failed attempts to get the bill passed in Parliament. A look at the previous bills shows though the lokpal bill was introduced for the first time in Parliament in 1968, it was only in 1989, during the fifth unsuccessful attempt, that it proposed to cover the prime minister.<br />
<br />
This trend continued in the bills introduced in 1996, 1998 and 2001, shows the data compiled by the PRS Legislative Research service.<br />
<br />
&quot;The office of the prime minister was brought within the ambit of lokpal by the government headed by VP Singh through the 1989 bill. In subsequent bills, it was proposed to bring the prime minister in the purview of the lokpal,&quot; stated a parliamentary standing committee report of 2002, submitted by its then chairman Pranab Mukherjee.<br />
<br />
Interestingly, the bill introduced in Parliament during the late VP Singh's tenure, included his office but excluded MPs.<br />
<br />
The committee headed by Mukherjee had stated, &quot;Though the PM was first among equals&hellip; but given the general perception about the prevalence of corruption, making public representatives accountable would enhance the reputation of those holding high offices.&quot;&nbsp; The first and second lokpal bills in 1968 and 1971, had proposed setting-up of lokayuktas in states also.<br />
<br />
In the last four decades and eight attempts, the lokpal bill underwent many changes.<br />
<br />
The statement of objects and reasons for the bill introduced by the minister of state for personnel, V Narayansamy in the Lok Sabha on Thursday, stated: &quot;A need has been felt to constitute a mechanism for dealing with complaints on corruption against public functionaries in high places.&quot; <br />
</div>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Hindustan Times, 7 August, 2011, http://www.hindustantimes.com/4-previous-lokpal-bills-had-covered-PM/H1-Article1-730295.aspx',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => '4-previous-lokpal-bills-had-covered-pm-by-nagendar-sharma-9394',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 9394,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
},
'articleid' => (int) 9286,
'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 4 previous lokpal bills had covered PM by Nagendar Sharma',
'metaKeywords' => 'lokpal bill',
'metaDesc' => '
The government's decision to exclude the prime minister from the ambit of the lokpal contradicts the position taken by previous governments on this issue between 1989 and 2001, in their failed attempts to get the bill passed in Parliament. A...',
'disp' => '<br /><div align="justify">The government's decision to exclude the prime minister from the ambit of the lokpal contradicts the position taken by previous governments on this issue between 1989 and 2001, in their failed attempts to get the bill passed in Parliament. A look at the previous bills shows though the lokpal bill was introduced for the first time in Parliament in 1968, it was only in 1989, during the fifth unsuccessful attempt, that it proposed to cover the prime minister.<br /><br />This trend continued in the bills introduced in 1996, 1998 and 2001, shows the data compiled by the PRS Legislative Research service.<br /><br />&quot;The office of the prime minister was brought within the ambit of lokpal by the government headed by VP Singh through the 1989 bill. In subsequent bills, it was proposed to bring the prime minister in the purview of the lokpal,&quot; stated a parliamentary standing committee report of 2002, submitted by its then chairman Pranab Mukherjee.<br /><br />Interestingly, the bill introduced in Parliament during the late VP Singh's tenure, included his office but excluded MPs.<br /><br />The committee headed by Mukherjee had stated, &quot;Though the PM was first among equals&hellip; but given the general perception about the prevalence of corruption, making public representatives accountable would enhance the reputation of those holding high offices.&quot;&nbsp; The first and second lokpal bills in 1968 and 1971, had proposed setting-up of lokayuktas in states also.<br /><br />In the last four decades and eight attempts, the lokpal bill underwent many changes.<br /><br />The statement of objects and reasons for the bill introduced by the minister of state for personnel, V Narayansamy in the Lok Sabha on Thursday, stated: &quot;A need has been felt to constitute a mechanism for dealing with complaints on corruption against public functionaries in high places.&quot; <br /></div>',
'lang' => 'English',
'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
'site_title' => 'im4change',
'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 9286,
'title' => '4 previous lokpal bills had covered PM by Nagendar Sharma',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<br />
<div align="justify">
The government's decision to exclude the prime minister from the ambit of the lokpal contradicts the position taken by previous governments on this issue between 1989 and 2001, in their failed attempts to get the bill passed in Parliament. A look at the previous bills shows though the lokpal bill was introduced for the first time in Parliament in 1968, it was only in 1989, during the fifth unsuccessful attempt, that it proposed to cover the prime minister.<br />
<br />
This trend continued in the bills introduced in 1996, 1998 and 2001, shows the data compiled by the PRS Legislative Research service.<br />
<br />
&quot;The office of the prime minister was brought within the ambit of lokpal by the government headed by VP Singh through the 1989 bill. In subsequent bills, it was proposed to bring the prime minister in the purview of the lokpal,&quot; stated a parliamentary standing committee report of 2002, submitted by its then chairman Pranab Mukherjee.<br />
<br />
Interestingly, the bill introduced in Parliament during the late VP Singh's tenure, included his office but excluded MPs.<br />
<br />
The committee headed by Mukherjee had stated, &quot;Though the PM was first among equals&hellip; but given the general perception about the prevalence of corruption, making public representatives accountable would enhance the reputation of those holding high offices.&quot;&nbsp; The first and second lokpal bills in 1968 and 1971, had proposed setting-up of lokayuktas in states also.<br />
<br />
In the last four decades and eight attempts, the lokpal bill underwent many changes.<br />
<br />
The statement of objects and reasons for the bill introduced by the minister of state for personnel, V Narayansamy in the Lok Sabha on Thursday, stated: &quot;A need has been felt to constitute a mechanism for dealing with complaints on corruption against public functionaries in high places.&quot; <br />
</div>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Hindustan Times, 7 August, 2011, http://www.hindustantimes.com/4-previous-lokpal-bills-had-covered-PM/H1-Article1-730295.aspx',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => '4-previous-lokpal-bills-had-covered-pm-by-nagendar-sharma-9394',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 9394,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
'*' => true,
'id' => false
],
'[dirty]' => [],
'[original]' => [],
'[virtual]' => [],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [],
'[invalid]' => [],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
}
$articleid = (int) 9286
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 4 previous lokpal bills had covered PM by Nagendar Sharma'
$metaKeywords = 'lokpal bill'
$metaDesc = '
The government's decision to exclude the prime minister from the ambit of the lokpal contradicts the position taken by previous governments on this issue between 1989 and 2001, in their failed attempts to get the bill passed in Parliament. A...'
$disp = '<br /><div align="justify">The government's decision to exclude the prime minister from the ambit of the lokpal contradicts the position taken by previous governments on this issue between 1989 and 2001, in their failed attempts to get the bill passed in Parliament. A look at the previous bills shows though the lokpal bill was introduced for the first time in Parliament in 1968, it was only in 1989, during the fifth unsuccessful attempt, that it proposed to cover the prime minister.<br /><br />This trend continued in the bills introduced in 1996, 1998 and 2001, shows the data compiled by the PRS Legislative Research service.<br /><br />&quot;The office of the prime minister was brought within the ambit of lokpal by the government headed by VP Singh through the 1989 bill. In subsequent bills, it was proposed to bring the prime minister in the purview of the lokpal,&quot; stated a parliamentary standing committee report of 2002, submitted by its then chairman Pranab Mukherjee.<br /><br />Interestingly, the bill introduced in Parliament during the late VP Singh's tenure, included his office but excluded MPs.<br /><br />The committee headed by Mukherjee had stated, &quot;Though the PM was first among equals&hellip; but given the general perception about the prevalence of corruption, making public representatives accountable would enhance the reputation of those holding high offices.&quot;&nbsp; The first and second lokpal bills in 1968 and 1971, had proposed setting-up of lokayuktas in states also.<br /><br />In the last four decades and eight attempts, the lokpal bill underwent many changes.<br /><br />The statement of objects and reasons for the bill introduced by the minister of state for personnel, V Narayansamy in the Lok Sabha on Thursday, stated: &quot;A need has been felt to constitute a mechanism for dealing with complaints on corruption against public functionaries in high places.&quot; <br /></div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/4-previous-lokpal-bills-had-covered-pm-by-nagendar-sharma-9394.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
<link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
media="all"/>
<title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 4 previous lokpal bills had covered PM by Nagendar Sharma | Im4change.org</title>
<meta name="description" content="
The government's decision to exclude the prime minister from the ambit of the lokpal contradicts the position taken by previous governments on this issue between 1989 and 2001, in their failed attempts to get the bill passed in Parliament. A..."/>
<script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
<script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">
$(document).ready(function () {
var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
$("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
.attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
.load(function () {
pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not
pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
});
});
</script>
<style type="text/css">
@media screen {
div.divFooter {
display: block;
}
}
@media print {
.printbutton {
display: none !important;
}
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
<tr>
<td class="top_bg">
<div class="divFooter">
<img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="topspace"> </td>
</tr>
<tr id="topspace">
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%">
<h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
<strong>4 previous lokpal bills had covered PM by Nagendar Sharma</strong></h1>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
<br /><div align="justify">The government's decision to exclude the prime minister from the ambit of the lokpal contradicts the position taken by previous governments on this issue between 1989 and 2001, in their failed attempts to get the bill passed in Parliament. A look at the previous bills shows though the lokpal bill was introduced for the first time in Parliament in 1968, it was only in 1989, during the fifth unsuccessful attempt, that it proposed to cover the prime minister.<br /><br />This trend continued in the bills introduced in 1996, 1998 and 2001, shows the data compiled by the PRS Legislative Research service.<br /><br />"The office of the prime minister was brought within the ambit of lokpal by the government headed by VP Singh through the 1989 bill. In subsequent bills, it was proposed to bring the prime minister in the purview of the lokpal," stated a parliamentary standing committee report of 2002, submitted by its then chairman Pranab Mukherjee.<br /><br />Interestingly, the bill introduced in Parliament during the late VP Singh's tenure, included his office but excluded MPs.<br /><br />The committee headed by Mukherjee had stated, "Though the PM was first among equals… but given the general perception about the prevalence of corruption, making public representatives accountable would enhance the reputation of those holding high offices." The first and second lokpal bills in 1968 and 1971, had proposed setting-up of lokayuktas in states also.<br /><br />In the last four decades and eight attempts, the lokpal bill underwent many changes.<br /><br />The statement of objects and reasons for the bill introduced by the minister of state for personnel, V Narayansamy in the Lok Sabha on Thursday, stated: "A need has been felt to constitute a mechanism for dealing with complaints on corruption against public functionaries in high places." <br /></div> </font>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
</table></body>
</html>'
}
$cookies = []
$values = [
(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 9286,
'title' => '4 previous lokpal bills had covered PM by Nagendar Sharma',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<br />
<div align="justify">
The government's decision to exclude the prime minister from the ambit of the lokpal contradicts the position taken by previous governments on this issue between 1989 and 2001, in their failed attempts to get the bill passed in Parliament. A look at the previous bills shows though the lokpal bill was introduced for the first time in Parliament in 1968, it was only in 1989, during the fifth unsuccessful attempt, that it proposed to cover the prime minister.<br />
<br />
This trend continued in the bills introduced in 1996, 1998 and 2001, shows the data compiled by the PRS Legislative Research service.<br />
<br />
"The office of the prime minister was brought within the ambit of lokpal by the government headed by VP Singh through the 1989 bill. In subsequent bills, it was proposed to bring the prime minister in the purview of the lokpal," stated a parliamentary standing committee report of 2002, submitted by its then chairman Pranab Mukherjee.<br />
<br />
Interestingly, the bill introduced in Parliament during the late VP Singh's tenure, included his office but excluded MPs.<br />
<br />
The committee headed by Mukherjee had stated, "Though the PM was first among equals… but given the general perception about the prevalence of corruption, making public representatives accountable would enhance the reputation of those holding high offices." The first and second lokpal bills in 1968 and 1971, had proposed setting-up of lokayuktas in states also.<br />
<br />
In the last four decades and eight attempts, the lokpal bill underwent many changes.<br />
<br />
The statement of objects and reasons for the bill introduced by the minister of state for personnel, V Narayansamy in the Lok Sabha on Thursday, stated: "A need has been felt to constitute a mechanism for dealing with complaints on corruption against public functionaries in high places." <br />
</div>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Hindustan Times, 7 August, 2011, http://www.hindustantimes.com/4-previous-lokpal-bills-had-covered-PM/H1-Article1-730295.aspx',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => '4-previous-lokpal-bills-had-covered-pm-by-nagendar-sharma-9394',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 9394,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
},
'articleid' => (int) 9286,
'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 4 previous lokpal bills had covered PM by Nagendar Sharma',
'metaKeywords' => 'lokpal bill',
'metaDesc' => '
The government's decision to exclude the prime minister from the ambit of the lokpal contradicts the position taken by previous governments on this issue between 1989 and 2001, in their failed attempts to get the bill passed in Parliament. A...',
'disp' => '<br /><div align="justify">The government's decision to exclude the prime minister from the ambit of the lokpal contradicts the position taken by previous governments on this issue between 1989 and 2001, in their failed attempts to get the bill passed in Parliament. A look at the previous bills shows though the lokpal bill was introduced for the first time in Parliament in 1968, it was only in 1989, during the fifth unsuccessful attempt, that it proposed to cover the prime minister.<br /><br />This trend continued in the bills introduced in 1996, 1998 and 2001, shows the data compiled by the PRS Legislative Research service.<br /><br />"The office of the prime minister was brought within the ambit of lokpal by the government headed by VP Singh through the 1989 bill. In subsequent bills, it was proposed to bring the prime minister in the purview of the lokpal," stated a parliamentary standing committee report of 2002, submitted by its then chairman Pranab Mukherjee.<br /><br />Interestingly, the bill introduced in Parliament during the late VP Singh's tenure, included his office but excluded MPs.<br /><br />The committee headed by Mukherjee had stated, "Though the PM was first among equals… but given the general perception about the prevalence of corruption, making public representatives accountable would enhance the reputation of those holding high offices." The first and second lokpal bills in 1968 and 1971, had proposed setting-up of lokayuktas in states also.<br /><br />In the last four decades and eight attempts, the lokpal bill underwent many changes.<br /><br />The statement of objects and reasons for the bill introduced by the minister of state for personnel, V Narayansamy in the Lok Sabha on Thursday, stated: "A need has been felt to constitute a mechanism for dealing with complaints on corruption against public functionaries in high places." <br /></div>',
'lang' => 'English',
'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
'site_title' => 'im4change',
'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 9286,
'title' => '4 previous lokpal bills had covered PM by Nagendar Sharma',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<br />
<div align="justify">
The government's decision to exclude the prime minister from the ambit of the lokpal contradicts the position taken by previous governments on this issue between 1989 and 2001, in their failed attempts to get the bill passed in Parliament. A look at the previous bills shows though the lokpal bill was introduced for the first time in Parliament in 1968, it was only in 1989, during the fifth unsuccessful attempt, that it proposed to cover the prime minister.<br />
<br />
This trend continued in the bills introduced in 1996, 1998 and 2001, shows the data compiled by the PRS Legislative Research service.<br />
<br />
"The office of the prime minister was brought within the ambit of lokpal by the government headed by VP Singh through the 1989 bill. In subsequent bills, it was proposed to bring the prime minister in the purview of the lokpal," stated a parliamentary standing committee report of 2002, submitted by its then chairman Pranab Mukherjee.<br />
<br />
Interestingly, the bill introduced in Parliament during the late VP Singh's tenure, included his office but excluded MPs.<br />
<br />
The committee headed by Mukherjee had stated, "Though the PM was first among equals… but given the general perception about the prevalence of corruption, making public representatives accountable would enhance the reputation of those holding high offices." The first and second lokpal bills in 1968 and 1971, had proposed setting-up of lokayuktas in states also.<br />
<br />
In the last four decades and eight attempts, the lokpal bill underwent many changes.<br />
<br />
The statement of objects and reasons for the bill introduced by the minister of state for personnel, V Narayansamy in the Lok Sabha on Thursday, stated: "A need has been felt to constitute a mechanism for dealing with complaints on corruption against public functionaries in high places." <br />
</div>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Hindustan Times, 7 August, 2011, http://www.hindustantimes.com/4-previous-lokpal-bills-had-covered-PM/H1-Article1-730295.aspx',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => '4-previous-lokpal-bills-had-covered-pm-by-nagendar-sharma-9394',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 9394,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
'*' => true,
'id' => false
],
'[dirty]' => [],
'[original]' => [],
'[virtual]' => [],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [],
'[invalid]' => [],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
}
$articleid = (int) 9286
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 4 previous lokpal bills had covered PM by Nagendar Sharma'
$metaKeywords = 'lokpal bill'
$metaDesc = '
The government's decision to exclude the prime minister from the ambit of the lokpal contradicts the position taken by previous governments on this issue between 1989 and 2001, in their failed attempts to get the bill passed in Parliament. A...'
$disp = '<br /><div align="justify">The government's decision to exclude the prime minister from the ambit of the lokpal contradicts the position taken by previous governments on this issue between 1989 and 2001, in their failed attempts to get the bill passed in Parliament. A look at the previous bills shows though the lokpal bill was introduced for the first time in Parliament in 1968, it was only in 1989, during the fifth unsuccessful attempt, that it proposed to cover the prime minister.<br /><br />This trend continued in the bills introduced in 1996, 1998 and 2001, shows the data compiled by the PRS Legislative Research service.<br /><br />"The office of the prime minister was brought within the ambit of lokpal by the government headed by VP Singh through the 1989 bill. In subsequent bills, it was proposed to bring the prime minister in the purview of the lokpal," stated a parliamentary standing committee report of 2002, submitted by its then chairman Pranab Mukherjee.<br /><br />Interestingly, the bill introduced in Parliament during the late VP Singh's tenure, included his office but excluded MPs.<br /><br />The committee headed by Mukherjee had stated, "Though the PM was first among equals… but given the general perception about the prevalence of corruption, making public representatives accountable would enhance the reputation of those holding high offices." The first and second lokpal bills in 1968 and 1971, had proposed setting-up of lokayuktas in states also.<br /><br />In the last four decades and eight attempts, the lokpal bill underwent many changes.<br /><br />The statement of objects and reasons for the bill introduced by the minister of state for personnel, V Narayansamy in the Lok Sabha on Thursday, stated: "A need has been felt to constitute a mechanism for dealing with complaints on corruption against public functionaries in high places." <br /></div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
latest-news-updates/4-previous-lokpal-bills-had-covered-pm-by-nagendar-sharma-9394.html"/>
LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 4 previous lokpal bills had covered PM by Nagendar Sharma | Im4change.org
4 previous lokpal bills had covered PM by Nagendar Sharma
The government's decision to exclude the prime minister from the ambit of the lokpal contradicts the position taken by previous governments on this issue between 1989 and 2001, in their failed attempts to get the bill passed in Parliament. A look at the previous bills shows though the lokpal bill was introduced for the first time in Parliament in 1968, it was only in 1989, during the fifth unsuccessful attempt, that it proposed to cover the prime minister.
This trend continued in the bills introduced in 1996, 1998 and 2001, shows the data compiled by the PRS Legislative Research service.
"The office of the prime minister was brought within the ambit of lokpal by the government headed by VP Singh through the 1989 bill. In subsequent bills, it was proposed to bring the prime minister in the purview of the lokpal," stated a parliamentary standing committee report of 2002, submitted by its then chairman Pranab Mukherjee.
Interestingly, the bill introduced in Parliament during the late VP Singh's tenure, included his office but excluded MPs.
The committee headed by Mukherjee had stated, "Though the PM was first among equals… but given the general perception about the prevalence of corruption, making public representatives accountable would enhance the reputation of those holding high offices." The first and second lokpal bills in 1968 and 1971, had proposed setting-up of lokayuktas in states also.
In the last four decades and eight attempts, the lokpal bill underwent many changes.
The statement of objects and reasons for the bill introduced by the minister of state for personnel, V Narayansamy in the Lok Sabha on Thursday, stated: "A need has been felt to constitute a mechanism for dealing with complaints on corruption against public functionaries in high places."
