Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/5-crore-people-moved-out-of-poverty-government-13835/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/5-crore-people-moved-out-of-poverty-government-13835/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/5-crore-people-moved-out-of-poverty-government-13835/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/5-crore-people-moved-out-of-poverty-government-13835/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6820bcc44f1ca-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6820bcc44f1ca-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6820bcc44f1ca-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6820bcc44f1ca-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6820bcc44f1ca-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6820bcc44f1ca-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6820bcc44f1ca-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6820bcc44f1ca-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6820bcc44f1ca-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 13712, 'title' => '5 crore people moved out of poverty: Government', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Data released by the Planning Commission on Monday showed that poverty had significantly declined between 2004-05 and 2009-10. The catch is that this decline is based on a poverty line that is even lower than the earlier Rs 32-per-day mark that had triggered an outrage when the government submitted it to the Supreme Court.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The new estimates are based on a poverty line that averages Rs 672.8 per month (Rs 22.43 per day) in rural areas and Rs 859.6 per month (Rs 28.65 per day) in urban areas for 2009-10. In a state like Delhi, the urban poverty line translates to Rs 34.67 per person per day.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In the Supreme Court, the government had submitted that the updated poverty line was likely to be Rs 26 per day in rural areas and Rs 32 per day in the towns in June 2011.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> As things stand, a host of centrally sponsored social security schemes for the poor exclude those above these poverty lines from availing of the benefits under the schemes.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> By the lowered benchmarks, poverty across the country declined by 7.3 percentage points from 37.2% in 2004-05 to 29.8% in 2009-10. In absolute terms, there were 35.5 crore poor people in 2009-10 against 40.7 crore five years earlier.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>MGNREGS, higher wages help reduce poverty level&nbsp;</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Officials said the sharp decline in poverty between 2004-05 and 2009-10-rural poverty going down by 8 percentage points from 41.8% to 33.8% and urban poverty by 4.8 percentage points from 25.7% to 20.9% - had been aided by high growth, hike in wages and implementation of key schemes like the MGNREGS.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;It is largely due to better agriculture growth and improvement in livelihood,&quot; a senior plan panel official said. According to Crisil, the sharp increase in wages which was near simultaneous across income groups in urban and rural India since 2004-05 boosted consumption demand. Urban and rural wages rose by 12.0-14.0 % over 2004-05 to 2009-10, compared to an increase of 7% in the previous five-year period. Increases in income were especially sharp after 2007-08.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> However, the poverty picture is extremely patchy with some states showing sharp reductions in the proportion of the BPL population while many others saw little or no change and five states in the north-east saw a larger percentage of their populations slipping below the mark. The poverty ratio in Himachal, MP, Maharashtra, Orissa, Sikkim, TN and Uttarakhand has declined by 10 percentage points or more. But in Assam, Meghalaya, Manipur, Mizoram and Nagaland, poverty ratios in 2009-10 are higher than in '04-05. The data showed Bihar, Chhattisgarh and UP have shown only marginal decline in poverty ratio, particularly in rural areas. Given the size of UP and Bihar and the fact the base is already low, this is a worrying sign.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Orissa, which had the highest poverty headcount ratio (57%) in 2004-5, has brought the proportion of poor down to 37% as per the new benchmark. Bihar (53.5%), Chhattisgarh (48.7%) and Manipur (47.1%) now have the three worst poverty headcount ratios. Applying the Tendulkar methodology, on which these figures are based, to 1993-94 data shows that Himachal has been the fastest at reducing poverty, bringing the proportion of people under the poverty line to 9.5%, less than a third of its 1993-4 numbers.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In rural areas, STs showed the highest level of poverty (47.4%), followed by SCs (42.3%), and OBCs (31.9%), against 33.8% for all classes. Among religious groups, Sikhs have the lowest poverty in rural areas (11.9%) while in urban areas, Christians have the lowest proportion (12.9%) of poor. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 20 March, 2012, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/indicators/5-crore-people-moved-out-of-poverty-government/articleshow/12337000.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => '5-crore-people-moved-out-of-poverty-government-13835', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 13835, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 13712, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 5 crore people moved out of poverty: Government', 'metaKeywords' => 'Poverty,bpl', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Economic Times Data released by the Planning Commission on Monday showed that poverty had significantly declined between 2004-05 and 2009-10. The catch is that this decline is based on a poverty line that is even lower than the earlier Rs...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Data released by the Planning Commission on Monday showed that poverty had significantly declined between 2004-05 and 2009-10. The catch is that this decline is based on a poverty line that is even lower than the earlier Rs 32-per-day mark that had triggered an outrage when the government submitted it to the Supreme Court.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The new estimates are based on a poverty line that averages Rs 672.8 per month (Rs 22.43 per day) in rural areas and Rs 859.6 per month (Rs 28.65 per day) in urban areas for 2009-10. In a state like Delhi, the urban poverty line translates to Rs 34.67 per person per day.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In the Supreme Court, the government had submitted that the updated poverty line was likely to be Rs 26 per day in rural areas and Rs 32 per day in the towns in June 2011.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">As things stand, a host of centrally sponsored social security schemes for the poor exclude those above these poverty lines from availing of the benefits under the schemes.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">By the lowered benchmarks, poverty across the country declined by 7.3 percentage points from 37.2% in 2004-05 to 29.8% in 2009-10. In absolute terms, there were 35.5 crore poor people in 2009-10 against 40.7 crore five years earlier.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>MGNREGS, higher wages help reduce poverty level&nbsp;</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Officials said the sharp decline in poverty between 2004-05 and 2009-10-rural poverty going down by 8 percentage points from 41.8% to 33.8% and urban poverty by 4.8 percentage points from 25.7% to 20.9% - had been aided by high growth, hike in wages and implementation of key schemes like the MGNREGS.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;It is largely due to better agriculture growth and improvement in livelihood,&quot; a senior plan panel official said. According to Crisil, the sharp increase in wages which was near simultaneous across income groups in urban and rural India since 2004-05 boosted consumption demand. Urban and rural wages rose by 12.0-14.0 % over 2004-05 to 2009-10, compared to an increase of 7% in the previous five-year period. Increases in income were especially sharp after 2007-08.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the poverty picture is extremely patchy with some states showing sharp reductions in the proportion of the BPL population while many others saw little or no change and five states in the north-east saw a larger percentage of their populations slipping below the mark. The poverty ratio in Himachal, MP, Maharashtra, Orissa, Sikkim, TN and Uttarakhand has declined by 10 percentage points or more. But in Assam, Meghalaya, Manipur, Mizoram and Nagaland, poverty ratios in 2009-10 are higher than in '04-05. The data showed Bihar, Chhattisgarh and UP have shown only marginal decline in poverty ratio, particularly in rural areas. Given the size of UP and Bihar and the fact the base is already low, this is a worrying sign.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Orissa, which had the highest poverty headcount ratio (57%) in 2004-5, has brought the proportion of poor down to 37% as per the new benchmark. Bihar (53.5%), Chhattisgarh (48.7%) and Manipur (47.1%) now have the three worst poverty headcount ratios. Applying the Tendulkar methodology, on which these figures are based, to 1993-94 data shows that Himachal has been the fastest at reducing poverty, bringing the proportion of people under the poverty line to 9.5%, less than a third of its 1993-4 numbers.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In rural areas, STs showed the highest level of poverty (47.4%), followed by SCs (42.3%), and OBCs (31.9%), against 33.8% for all classes. Among religious groups, Sikhs have the lowest poverty in rural areas (11.9%) while in urban areas, Christians have the lowest proportion (12.9%) of poor.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 13712, 'title' => '5 crore people moved out of poverty: Government', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Data released by the Planning Commission on Monday showed that poverty had significantly declined between 2004-05 and 2009-10. The catch is that this decline is based on a poverty line that is even lower than the earlier Rs 32-per-day mark that had triggered an outrage when the government submitted it to the Supreme Court.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The new estimates are based on a poverty line that averages Rs 672.8 per month (Rs 22.43 per day) in rural areas and Rs 859.6 per month (Rs 28.65 per day) in urban areas for 2009-10. In a state like Delhi, the urban poverty line translates to Rs 34.67 per person per day.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In the Supreme Court, the government had submitted that the updated poverty line was likely to be Rs 26 per day in rural areas and Rs 32 per day in the towns in June 2011.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> As things stand, a host of centrally sponsored social security schemes for the poor exclude those above these poverty lines from availing of the benefits under the schemes.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> By the lowered benchmarks, poverty across the country declined by 7.3 percentage points from 37.2% in 2004-05 to 29.8% in 2009-10. In absolute terms, there were 35.5 crore poor people in 2009-10 against 40.7 crore five years earlier.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>MGNREGS, higher wages help reduce poverty level&nbsp;</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Officials said the sharp decline in poverty between 2004-05 and 2009-10-rural poverty going down by 8 percentage points from 41.8% to 33.8% and urban poverty by 4.8 percentage points from 25.7% to 20.9% - had been aided by high growth, hike in wages and implementation of key schemes like the MGNREGS.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;It is largely due to better agriculture growth and improvement in livelihood,&quot; a senior plan panel official said. According to Crisil, the sharp increase in wages which was near simultaneous across income groups in urban and rural India since 2004-05 boosted consumption demand. Urban and rural wages rose by 12.0-14.0 % over 2004-05 to 2009-10, compared to an increase of 7% in the previous five-year period. Increases in income were especially sharp after 2007-08.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> However, the poverty picture is extremely patchy with some states showing sharp reductions in the proportion of the BPL population while many others saw little or no change and five states in the north-east saw a larger percentage of their populations slipping below the mark. The poverty ratio in Himachal, MP, Maharashtra, Orissa, Sikkim, TN and Uttarakhand has declined by 10 percentage points or more. But in Assam, Meghalaya, Manipur, Mizoram and Nagaland, poverty ratios in 2009-10 are higher than in '04-05. The data showed Bihar, Chhattisgarh and UP have shown only marginal decline in poverty ratio, particularly in rural areas. Given the size of UP and Bihar and the fact the base is already low, this is a worrying sign.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Orissa, which had the highest poverty headcount ratio (57%) in 2004-5, has brought the proportion of poor down to 37% as per the new benchmark. Bihar (53.5%), Chhattisgarh (48.7%) and Manipur (47.1%) now have the three worst poverty headcount ratios. Applying the Tendulkar methodology, on which these figures are based, to 1993-94 data shows that Himachal has been the fastest at reducing poverty, bringing the proportion of people under the poverty line to 9.5%, less than a third of its 1993-4 numbers.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In rural areas, STs showed the highest level of poverty (47.4%), followed by SCs (42.3%), and OBCs (31.9%), against 33.8% for all classes. Among religious groups, Sikhs have the lowest poverty in rural areas (11.9%) while in urban areas, Christians have the lowest proportion (12.9%) of poor. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 20 March, 2012, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/indicators/5-crore-people-moved-out-of-poverty-government/articleshow/12337000.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => '5-crore-people-moved-out-of-poverty-government-13835', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 13835, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 13712 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 5 crore people moved out of poverty: Government' $metaKeywords = 'Poverty,bpl' $metaDesc = ' -The Economic Times Data released by the Planning Commission on Monday showed that poverty had significantly declined between 2004-05 and 2009-10. The catch is that this decline is based on a poverty line that is even lower than the earlier Rs...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Data released by the Planning Commission on Monday showed that poverty had significantly declined between 2004-05 and 2009-10. The catch is that this decline is based on a poverty line that is even lower than the earlier Rs 32-per-day mark that had triggered an outrage when the government submitted it to the Supreme Court.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The new estimates are based on a poverty line that averages Rs 672.8 per month (Rs 22.43 per day) in rural areas and Rs 859.6 per month (Rs 28.65 per day) in urban areas for 2009-10. In a state like Delhi, the urban poverty line translates to Rs 34.67 per person per day.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In the Supreme Court, the government had submitted that the updated poverty line was likely to be Rs 26 per day in rural areas and Rs 32 per day in the towns in June 2011.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">As things stand, a host of centrally sponsored social security schemes for the poor exclude those above these poverty lines from availing of the benefits under the schemes.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">By the lowered benchmarks, poverty across the country declined by 7.3 percentage points from 37.2% in 2004-05 to 29.8% in 2009-10. In absolute terms, there were 35.5 crore poor people in 2009-10 against 40.7 crore five years earlier.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>MGNREGS, higher wages help reduce poverty level&nbsp;</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Officials said the sharp decline in poverty between 2004-05 and 2009-10-rural poverty going down by 8 percentage points from 41.8% to 33.8% and urban poverty by 4.8 percentage points from 25.7% to 20.9% - had been aided by high growth, hike in wages and implementation of key schemes like the MGNREGS.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;It is largely due to better agriculture growth and improvement in livelihood,&quot; a senior plan panel official said. According to Crisil, the sharp increase in wages which was near simultaneous across income groups in urban and rural India since 2004-05 boosted consumption demand. Urban and rural wages rose by 12.0-14.0 % over 2004-05 to 2009-10, compared to an increase of 7% in the previous five-year period. Increases in income were especially sharp after 2007-08.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the poverty picture is extremely patchy with some states showing sharp reductions in the proportion of the BPL population while many others saw little or no change and five states in the north-east saw a larger percentage of their populations slipping below the mark. The poverty ratio in Himachal, MP, Maharashtra, Orissa, Sikkim, TN and Uttarakhand has declined by 10 percentage points or more. But in Assam, Meghalaya, Manipur, Mizoram and Nagaland, poverty ratios in 2009-10 are higher than in '04-05. The data showed Bihar, Chhattisgarh and UP have shown only marginal decline in poverty ratio, particularly in rural areas. Given the size of UP and Bihar and the fact the base is already low, this is a worrying sign.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Orissa, which had the highest poverty headcount ratio (57%) in 2004-5, has brought the proportion of poor down to 37% as per the new benchmark. Bihar (53.5%), Chhattisgarh (48.7%) and Manipur (47.1%) now have the three worst poverty headcount ratios. Applying the Tendulkar methodology, on which these figures are based, to 1993-94 data shows that Himachal has been the fastest at reducing poverty, bringing the proportion of people under the poverty line to 9.5%, less than a third of its 1993-4 numbers.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In rural areas, STs showed the highest level of poverty (47.4%), followed by SCs (42.3%), and OBCs (31.9%), against 33.8% for all classes. Among religious groups, Sikhs have the lowest poverty in rural areas (11.9%) while in urban areas, Christians have the lowest proportion (12.9%) of poor.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/5-crore-people-moved-out-of-poverty-government-13835.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 5 crore people moved out of poverty: Government | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Economic Times Data released by the Planning Commission on Monday showed that poverty had significantly declined between 2004-05 and 2009-10. The catch is that this decline is based on a poverty line that is even lower than the earlier Rs..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>5 crore people moved out of poverty: Government</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Data released by the Planning Commission on Monday showed that poverty had significantly declined between 2004-05 and 2009-10. The catch is that this decline is based on a poverty line that is even lower than the earlier Rs 32-per-day mark that had triggered an outrage when the government submitted it to the Supreme Court. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The new estimates are based on a poverty line that averages Rs 672.8 per month (Rs 22.43 per day) in rural areas and Rs 859.6 per month (Rs 28.65 per day) in urban areas for 2009-10. In a state like Delhi, the urban poverty line translates to Rs 34.67 per person per day. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In the Supreme Court, the government had submitted that the updated poverty line was likely to be Rs 26 per day in rural areas and Rs 32 per day in the towns in June 2011. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">As things stand, a host of centrally sponsored social security schemes for the poor exclude those above these poverty lines from availing of the benefits under the schemes. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">By the lowered benchmarks, poverty across the country declined by 7.3 percentage points from 37.2% in 2004-05 to 29.8% in 2009-10. In absolute terms, there were 35.5 crore poor people in 2009-10 against 40.7 crore five years earlier. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>MGNREGS, higher wages help reduce poverty level </em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Officials said the sharp decline in poverty between 2004-05 and 2009-10-rural poverty going down by 8 percentage points from 41.8% to 33.8% and urban poverty by 4.8 percentage points from 25.7% to 20.9% - had been aided by high growth, hike in wages and implementation of key schemes like the MGNREGS. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"It is largely due to better agriculture growth and improvement in livelihood," a senior plan panel official said. According to Crisil, the sharp increase in wages which was near simultaneous across income groups in urban and rural India since 2004-05 boosted consumption demand. Urban and rural wages rose by 12.0-14.0 % over 2004-05 to 2009-10, compared to an increase of 7% in the previous five-year period. Increases in income were especially sharp after 2007-08. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the poverty picture is extremely patchy with some states showing sharp reductions in the proportion of the BPL population while many others saw little or no change and five states in the north-east saw a larger percentage of their populations slipping below the mark. The poverty ratio in Himachal, MP, Maharashtra, Orissa, Sikkim, TN and Uttarakhand has declined by 10 percentage points or more. But in Assam, Meghalaya, Manipur, Mizoram and Nagaland, poverty ratios in 2009-10 are higher than in '04-05. The data showed Bihar, Chhattisgarh and UP have shown only marginal decline in poverty ratio, particularly in rural areas. Given the size of UP and Bihar and the fact the base is already low, this is a worrying sign. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Orissa, which had the highest poverty headcount ratio (57%) in 2004-5, has brought the proportion of poor down to 37% as per the new benchmark. Bihar (53.5%), Chhattisgarh (48.7%) and Manipur (47.1%) now have the three worst poverty headcount ratios. Applying the Tendulkar methodology, on which these figures are based, to 1993-94 data shows that Himachal has been the fastest at reducing poverty, bringing the proportion of people under the poverty line to 9.5%, less than a third of its 1993-4 numbers. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In rural areas, STs showed the highest level of poverty (47.4%), followed by SCs (42.3%), and OBCs (31.9%), against 33.8% for all classes. Among religious groups, Sikhs have the lowest poverty in rural areas (11.9%) while in urban areas, Christians have the lowest proportion (12.9%) of poor.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6820bcc44f1ca-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6820bcc44f1ca-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6820bcc44f1ca-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6820bcc44f1ca-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6820bcc44f1ca-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6820bcc44f1ca-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6820bcc44f1ca-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6820bcc44f1ca-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6820bcc44f1ca-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 13712, 'title' => '5 crore people moved out of poverty: Government', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Data released by the Planning Commission on Monday showed that poverty had significantly declined between 2004-05 and 2009-10. The catch is that this decline is based on a poverty line that is even lower than the earlier Rs 32-per-day mark that had triggered an outrage when the government submitted it to the Supreme Court.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The new estimates are based on a poverty line that averages Rs 672.8 per month (Rs 22.43 per day) in rural areas and Rs 859.6 per month (Rs 28.65 per day) in urban areas for 2009-10. In a state like Delhi, the urban poverty line translates to Rs 34.67 per person per day.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In the Supreme Court, the government had submitted that the updated poverty line was likely to be Rs 26 per day in rural areas and Rs 32 per day in the towns in June 2011.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> As things stand, a host of centrally sponsored social security schemes for the poor exclude those above these poverty lines from availing of the benefits under the schemes.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> By the lowered benchmarks, poverty across the country declined by 7.3 percentage points from 37.2% in 2004-05 to 29.8% in 2009-10. In absolute terms, there were 35.5 crore poor people in 2009-10 against 40.7 crore five years earlier.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>MGNREGS, higher wages help reduce poverty level&nbsp;</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Officials said the sharp decline in poverty between 2004-05 and 2009-10-rural poverty going down by 8 percentage points from 41.8% to 33.8% and urban poverty by 4.8 percentage points from 25.7% to 20.9% - had been aided by high growth, hike in wages and implementation of key schemes like the MGNREGS.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;It is largely due to better agriculture growth and improvement in livelihood,&quot; a senior plan panel official said. According to Crisil, the sharp increase in wages which was near simultaneous across income groups in urban and rural India since 2004-05 boosted consumption demand. Urban and rural wages rose by 12.0-14.0 % over 2004-05 to 2009-10, compared to an increase of 7% in the previous five-year period. Increases in income were especially sharp after 2007-08.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> However, the poverty picture is extremely patchy with some states showing sharp reductions in the proportion of the BPL population while many others saw little or no change and five states in the north-east saw a larger percentage of their populations slipping below the mark. The poverty ratio in Himachal, MP, Maharashtra, Orissa, Sikkim, TN and Uttarakhand has declined by 10 percentage points or more. But in Assam, Meghalaya, Manipur, Mizoram and Nagaland, poverty ratios in 2009-10 are higher than in '04-05. The data showed Bihar, Chhattisgarh and UP have shown only marginal decline in poverty ratio, particularly in rural areas. Given the size of UP and Bihar and the fact the base is already low, this is a worrying sign.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Orissa, which had the highest poverty headcount ratio (57%) in 2004-5, has brought the proportion of poor down to 37% as per the new benchmark. Bihar (53.5%), Chhattisgarh (48.7%) and Manipur (47.1%) now have the three worst poverty headcount ratios. Applying the Tendulkar methodology, on which these figures are based, to 1993-94 data shows that Himachal has been the fastest at reducing poverty, bringing the proportion of people under the poverty line to 9.5%, less than a third of its 1993-4 numbers.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In rural areas, STs showed the highest level of poverty (47.4%), followed by SCs (42.3%), and OBCs (31.9%), against 33.8% for all classes. Among religious groups, Sikhs have the lowest poverty in rural areas (11.9%) while in urban areas, Christians have the lowest proportion (12.9%) of poor. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 20 March, 2012, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/indicators/5-crore-people-moved-out-of-poverty-government/articleshow/12337000.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => '5-crore-people-moved-out-of-poverty-government-13835', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 13835, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 13712, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 5 crore people moved out of poverty: Government', 'metaKeywords' => 'Poverty,bpl', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Economic Times Data released by the Planning Commission on Monday showed that poverty had significantly declined between 2004-05 and 2009-10. The catch is that this decline is based on a poverty line that is even lower than the earlier Rs...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Data released by the Planning Commission on Monday showed that poverty had significantly declined between 2004-05 and 2009-10. The catch is that this decline is based on a poverty line that is even lower than the earlier Rs 32-per-day mark that had triggered an outrage when the government submitted it to the Supreme Court.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The new estimates are based on a poverty line that averages Rs 672.8 per month (Rs 22.43 per day) in rural areas and Rs 859.6 per month (Rs 28.65 per day) in urban areas for 2009-10. In a state like Delhi, the urban poverty line translates to Rs 34.67 per person per day.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In the Supreme Court, the government had submitted that the updated poverty line was likely to be Rs 26 per day in rural areas and Rs 32 per day in the towns in June 2011.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">As things stand, a host of centrally sponsored social security schemes for the poor exclude those above these poverty lines from availing of the benefits under the schemes.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">By the lowered benchmarks, poverty across the country declined by 7.3 percentage points from 37.2% in 2004-05 to 29.8% in 2009-10. In absolute terms, there were 35.5 crore poor people in 2009-10 against 40.7 crore five years earlier.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>MGNREGS, higher wages help reduce poverty level&nbsp;</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Officials said the sharp decline in poverty between 2004-05 and 2009-10-rural poverty going down by 8 percentage points from 41.8% to 33.8% and urban poverty by 4.8 percentage points from 25.7% to 20.9% - had been aided by high growth, hike in wages and implementation of key schemes like the MGNREGS.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;It is largely due to better agriculture growth and improvement in livelihood,&quot; a senior plan panel official said. According to Crisil, the sharp increase in wages which was near simultaneous across income groups in urban and rural India since 2004-05 boosted consumption demand. Urban and rural wages rose by 12.0-14.0 % over 2004-05 to 2009-10, compared to an increase of 7% in the previous five-year period. Increases in income were especially sharp after 2007-08.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the poverty picture is extremely patchy with some states showing sharp reductions in the proportion of the BPL population while many others saw little or no change and five states in the north-east saw a larger percentage of their populations slipping below the mark. The poverty ratio in Himachal, MP, Maharashtra, Orissa, Sikkim, TN and Uttarakhand has declined by 10 percentage points or more. But in Assam, Meghalaya, Manipur, Mizoram and Nagaland, poverty ratios in 2009-10 are higher than in '04-05. The data showed Bihar, Chhattisgarh and UP have shown only marginal decline in poverty ratio, particularly in rural areas. Given the size of UP and Bihar and the fact the base is already low, this is a worrying sign.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Orissa, which had the highest poverty headcount ratio (57%) in 2004-5, has brought the proportion of poor down to 37% as per the new benchmark. Bihar (53.5%), Chhattisgarh (48.7%) and Manipur (47.1%) now have the three worst poverty headcount ratios. Applying the Tendulkar methodology, on which these figures are based, to 1993-94 data shows that Himachal has been the fastest at reducing poverty, bringing the proportion of people under the poverty line to 9.5%, less than a third of its 1993-4 numbers.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In rural areas, STs showed the highest level of poverty (47.4%), followed by SCs (42.3%), and OBCs (31.9%), against 33.8% for all classes. Among religious groups, Sikhs have the lowest poverty in rural areas (11.9%) while in urban areas, Christians have the lowest proportion (12.9%) of poor.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 13712, 'title' => '5 crore people moved out of poverty: Government', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Data released by the Planning Commission on Monday showed that poverty had significantly declined between 2004-05 and 2009-10. The catch is that this decline is based on a poverty line that is even lower than the earlier Rs 32-per-day mark that had triggered an outrage when the government submitted it to the Supreme Court.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The new estimates are based on a poverty line that averages Rs 672.8 per month (Rs 22.43 per day) in rural areas and Rs 859.6 per month (Rs 28.65 per day) in urban areas for 2009-10. In a state like Delhi, the urban poverty line translates to Rs 34.67 per person per day.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In the Supreme Court, the government had submitted that the updated poverty line was likely to be Rs 26 per day in rural areas and Rs 32 per day in the towns in June 2011.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> As things stand, a host of centrally sponsored social security schemes for the poor exclude those above these poverty lines from availing of the benefits under the schemes.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> By the lowered benchmarks, poverty across the country declined by 7.3 percentage points from 37.2% in 2004-05 to 29.8% in 2009-10. In absolute terms, there were 35.5 crore poor people in 2009-10 against 40.7 crore five years earlier.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>MGNREGS, higher wages help reduce poverty level&nbsp;</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Officials said the sharp decline in poverty between 2004-05 and 2009-10-rural poverty going down by 8 percentage points from 41.8% to 33.8% and urban poverty by 4.8 percentage points from 25.7% to 20.9% - had been aided by high growth, hike in wages and implementation of key schemes like the MGNREGS.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;It is largely due to better agriculture growth and improvement in livelihood,&quot; a senior plan panel official said. According to Crisil, the sharp increase in wages which was near simultaneous across income groups in urban and rural India since 2004-05 boosted consumption demand. Urban and rural wages rose by 12.0-14.0 % over 2004-05 to 2009-10, compared to an increase of 7% in the previous five-year period. Increases in income were especially sharp after 2007-08.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> However, the poverty picture is extremely patchy with some states showing sharp reductions in the proportion of the BPL population while many others saw little or no change and five states in the north-east saw a larger percentage of their populations slipping below the mark. The poverty ratio in Himachal, MP, Maharashtra, Orissa, Sikkim, TN and Uttarakhand has declined by 10 percentage points or more. But in Assam, Meghalaya, Manipur, Mizoram and Nagaland, poverty ratios in 2009-10 are higher than in '04-05. The data showed Bihar, Chhattisgarh and UP have shown only marginal decline in poverty ratio, particularly in rural areas. Given the size of UP and Bihar and the fact the base is already low, this is a worrying sign.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Orissa, which had the highest poverty headcount ratio (57%) in 2004-5, has brought the proportion of poor down to 37% as per the new benchmark. Bihar (53.5%), Chhattisgarh (48.7%) and Manipur (47.1%) now have the three worst poverty headcount ratios. Applying the Tendulkar methodology, on which these figures are based, to 1993-94 data shows that Himachal has been the fastest at reducing poverty, bringing the proportion of people under the poverty line to 9.5%, less than a third of its 1993-4 numbers.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In rural areas, STs showed the highest level of poverty (47.4%), followed by SCs (42.3%), and OBCs (31.9%), against 33.8% for all classes. Among religious groups, Sikhs have the lowest poverty in rural areas (11.9%) while in urban areas, Christians have the lowest proportion (12.9%) of poor. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 20 March, 2012, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/indicators/5-crore-people-moved-out-of-poverty-government/articleshow/12337000.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => '5-crore-people-moved-out-of-poverty-government-13835', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 13835, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 13712 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 5 crore people moved out of poverty: Government' $metaKeywords = 'Poverty,bpl' $metaDesc = ' -The Economic Times Data released by the Planning Commission on Monday showed that poverty had significantly declined between 2004-05 and 2009-10. The catch is that this decline is based on a poverty line that is even lower than the earlier Rs...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Data released by the Planning Commission on Monday showed that poverty had significantly declined between 2004-05 and 2009-10. The catch is that this decline is based on a poverty line that is even lower than the earlier Rs 32-per-day mark that had triggered an outrage when the government submitted it to the Supreme Court.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The new estimates are based on a poverty line that averages Rs 672.8 per month (Rs 22.43 per day) in rural areas and Rs 859.6 per month (Rs 28.65 per day) in urban areas for 2009-10. In a state like Delhi, the urban poverty line translates to Rs 34.67 per person per day.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In the Supreme Court, the government had submitted that the updated poverty line was likely to be Rs 26 per day in rural areas and Rs 32 per day in the towns in June 2011.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">As things stand, a host of centrally sponsored social security schemes for the poor exclude those above these poverty lines from availing of the benefits under the schemes.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">By the lowered benchmarks, poverty across the country declined by 7.3 percentage points from 37.2% in 2004-05 to 29.8% in 2009-10. In absolute terms, there were 35.5 crore poor people in 2009-10 against 40.7 crore five years earlier.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>MGNREGS, higher wages help reduce poverty level&nbsp;</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Officials said the sharp decline in poverty between 2004-05 and 2009-10-rural poverty going down by 8 percentage points from 41.8% to 33.8% and urban poverty by 4.8 percentage points from 25.7% to 20.9% - had been aided by high growth, hike in wages and implementation of key schemes like the MGNREGS.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;It is largely due to better agriculture growth and improvement in livelihood,&quot; a senior plan panel official said. According to Crisil, the sharp increase in wages which was near simultaneous across income groups in urban and rural India since 2004-05 boosted consumption demand. Urban and rural wages rose by 12.0-14.0 % over 2004-05 to 2009-10, compared to an increase of 7% in the previous five-year period. Increases in income were especially sharp after 2007-08.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the poverty picture is extremely patchy with some states showing sharp reductions in the proportion of the BPL population while many others saw little or no change and five states in the north-east saw a larger percentage of their populations slipping below the mark. The poverty ratio in Himachal, MP, Maharashtra, Orissa, Sikkim, TN and Uttarakhand has declined by 10 percentage points or more. But in Assam, Meghalaya, Manipur, Mizoram and Nagaland, poverty ratios in 2009-10 are higher than in '04-05. The data showed Bihar, Chhattisgarh and UP have shown only marginal decline in poverty ratio, particularly in rural areas. Given the size of UP and Bihar and the fact the base is already low, this is a worrying sign.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Orissa, which had the highest poverty headcount ratio (57%) in 2004-5, has brought the proportion of poor down to 37% as per the new benchmark. Bihar (53.5%), Chhattisgarh (48.7%) and Manipur (47.1%) now have the three worst poverty headcount ratios. Applying the Tendulkar methodology, on which these figures are based, to 1993-94 data shows that Himachal has been the fastest at reducing poverty, bringing the proportion of people under the poverty line to 9.5%, less than a third of its 1993-4 numbers.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In rural areas, STs showed the highest level of poverty (47.4%), followed by SCs (42.3%), and OBCs (31.9%), against 33.8% for all classes. Among religious groups, Sikhs have the lowest poverty in rural areas (11.9%) while in urban areas, Christians have the lowest proportion (12.9%) of poor.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/5-crore-people-moved-out-of-poverty-government-13835.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 5 crore people moved out of poverty: Government | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Economic Times Data released by the Planning Commission on Monday showed that poverty had significantly declined between 2004-05 and 2009-10. The catch is that this decline is based on a poverty line that is even lower than the earlier Rs..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>5 crore people moved out of poverty: Government</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Data released by the Planning Commission on Monday showed that poverty had significantly declined between 2004-05 and 2009-10. The catch is that this decline is based on a poverty line that is even lower than the earlier Rs 32-per-day mark that had triggered an outrage when the government submitted it to the Supreme Court. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The new estimates are based on a poverty line that averages Rs 672.8 per month (Rs 22.43 per day) in rural areas and Rs 859.6 per month (Rs 28.65 per day) in urban areas for 2009-10. In a state like Delhi, the urban poverty line translates to Rs 34.67 per person per day. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In the Supreme Court, the government had submitted that the updated poverty line was likely to be Rs 26 per day in rural areas and Rs 32 per day in the towns in June 2011. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">As things stand, a host of centrally sponsored social security schemes for the poor exclude those above these poverty lines from availing of the benefits under the schemes. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">By the lowered benchmarks, poverty across the country declined by 7.3 percentage points from 37.2% in 2004-05 to 29.8% in 2009-10. In absolute terms, there were 35.5 crore poor people in 2009-10 against 40.7 crore five years earlier. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>MGNREGS, higher wages help reduce poverty level </em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Officials said the sharp decline in poverty between 2004-05 and 2009-10-rural poverty going down by 8 percentage points from 41.8% to 33.8% and urban poverty by 4.8 percentage points from 25.7% to 20.9% - had been aided by high growth, hike in wages and implementation of key schemes like the MGNREGS. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"It is largely due to better agriculture growth and improvement in livelihood," a senior plan panel official said. According to Crisil, the sharp increase in wages which was near simultaneous across income groups in urban and rural India since 2004-05 boosted consumption demand. Urban and rural wages rose by 12.0-14.0 % over 2004-05 to 2009-10, compared to an increase of 7% in the previous five-year period. Increases in income were especially sharp after 2007-08. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the poverty picture is extremely patchy with some states showing sharp reductions in the proportion of the BPL population while many others saw little or no change and five states in the north-east saw a larger percentage of their populations slipping below the mark. The poverty ratio in Himachal, MP, Maharashtra, Orissa, Sikkim, TN and Uttarakhand has declined by 10 percentage points or more. But in Assam, Meghalaya, Manipur, Mizoram and Nagaland, poverty ratios in 2009-10 are higher than in '04-05. The data showed Bihar, Chhattisgarh and UP have shown only marginal decline in poverty ratio, particularly in rural areas. Given the size of UP and Bihar and the fact the base is already low, this is a worrying sign. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Orissa, which had the highest poverty headcount ratio (57%) in 2004-5, has brought the proportion of poor down to 37% as per the new benchmark. Bihar (53.5%), Chhattisgarh (48.7%) and Manipur (47.1%) now have the three worst poverty headcount ratios. Applying the Tendulkar methodology, on which these figures are based, to 1993-94 data shows that Himachal has been the fastest at reducing poverty, bringing the proportion of people under the poverty line to 9.5%, less than a third of its 1993-4 numbers. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In rural areas, STs showed the highest level of poverty (47.4%), followed by SCs (42.3%), and OBCs (31.9%), against 33.8% for all classes. Among religious groups, Sikhs have the lowest poverty in rural areas (11.9%) while in urban areas, Christians have the lowest proportion (12.9%) of poor.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6820bcc44f1ca-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6820bcc44f1ca-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6820bcc44f1ca-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6820bcc44f1ca-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6820bcc44f1ca-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6820bcc44f1ca-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6820bcc44f1ca-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6820bcc44f1ca-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6820bcc44f1ca-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 13712, 'title' => '5 crore people moved out of poverty: Government', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Data released by the Planning Commission on Monday showed that poverty had significantly declined between 2004-05 and 2009-10. The catch is that this decline is based on a poverty line that is even lower than the earlier Rs 32-per-day mark that had triggered an outrage when the government submitted it to the Supreme Court.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The new estimates are based on a poverty line that averages Rs 672.8 per month (Rs 22.43 per day) in rural areas and Rs 859.6 per month (Rs 28.65 per day) in urban areas for 2009-10. In a state like Delhi, the urban poverty line translates to Rs 34.67 per person per day.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In the Supreme Court, the government had submitted that the updated poverty line was likely to be Rs 26 per day in rural areas and Rs 32 per day in the towns in June 2011.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> As things stand, a host of centrally sponsored social security schemes for the poor exclude those above these poverty lines from availing of the benefits under the schemes.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> By the lowered benchmarks, poverty across the country declined by 7.3 percentage points from 37.2% in 2004-05 to 29.8% in 2009-10. In absolute terms, there were 35.5 crore poor people in 2009-10 against 40.7 crore five years earlier.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>MGNREGS, higher wages help reduce poverty level&nbsp;</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Officials said the sharp decline in poverty between 2004-05 and 2009-10-rural poverty going down by 8 percentage points from 41.8% to 33.8% and urban poverty by 4.8 percentage points from 25.7% to 20.9% - had been aided by high growth, hike in wages and implementation of key schemes like the MGNREGS.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;It is largely due to better agriculture growth and improvement in livelihood,&quot; a senior plan panel official said. According to Crisil, the sharp increase in wages which was near simultaneous across income groups in urban and rural India since 2004-05 boosted consumption demand. Urban and rural wages rose by 12.0-14.0 % over 2004-05 to 2009-10, compared to an increase of 7% in the previous five-year period. Increases in income were especially sharp after 2007-08.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> However, the poverty picture is extremely patchy with some states showing sharp reductions in the proportion of the BPL population while many others saw little or no change and five states in the north-east saw a larger percentage of their populations slipping below the mark. The poverty ratio in Himachal, MP, Maharashtra, Orissa, Sikkim, TN and Uttarakhand has declined by 10 percentage points or more. But in Assam, Meghalaya, Manipur, Mizoram and Nagaland, poverty ratios in 2009-10 are higher than in '04-05. The data showed Bihar, Chhattisgarh and UP have shown only marginal decline in poverty ratio, particularly in rural areas. Given the size of UP and Bihar and the fact the base is already low, this is a worrying sign.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Orissa, which had the highest poverty headcount ratio (57%) in 2004-5, has brought the proportion of poor down to 37% as per the new benchmark. Bihar (53.5%), Chhattisgarh (48.7%) and Manipur (47.1%) now have the three worst poverty headcount ratios. Applying the Tendulkar methodology, on which these figures are based, to 1993-94 data shows that Himachal has been the fastest at reducing poverty, bringing the proportion of people under the poverty line to 9.5%, less than a third of its 1993-4 numbers.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In rural areas, STs showed the highest level of poverty (47.4%), followed by SCs (42.3%), and OBCs (31.9%), against 33.8% for all classes. Among religious groups, Sikhs have the lowest poverty in rural areas (11.9%) while in urban areas, Christians have the lowest proportion (12.9%) of poor. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 20 March, 2012, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/indicators/5-crore-people-moved-out-of-poverty-government/articleshow/12337000.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => '5-crore-people-moved-out-of-poverty-government-13835', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 13835, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 13712, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 5 crore people moved out of poverty: Government', 'metaKeywords' => 'Poverty,bpl', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Economic Times Data released by the Planning Commission on Monday showed that poverty had significantly declined between 2004-05 and 2009-10. The catch is that this decline is based on a poverty line that is even lower than the earlier Rs...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Data released by the Planning Commission on Monday showed that poverty had significantly declined between 2004-05 and 2009-10. The catch is that this decline is based on a poverty line that is even lower than the earlier Rs 32-per-day mark that had triggered an outrage when the government submitted it to the Supreme Court.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The new estimates are based on a poverty line that averages Rs 672.8 per month (Rs 22.43 per day) in rural areas and Rs 859.6 per month (Rs 28.65 per day) in urban areas for 2009-10. In a state like Delhi, the urban poverty line translates to Rs 34.67 per person per day.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In the Supreme Court, the government had submitted that the updated poverty line was likely to be Rs 26 per day in rural areas and Rs 32 per day in the towns in June 2011.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">As things stand, a host of centrally sponsored social security schemes for the poor exclude those above these poverty lines from availing of the benefits under the schemes.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">By the lowered benchmarks, poverty across the country declined by 7.3 percentage points from 37.2% in 2004-05 to 29.8% in 2009-10. In absolute terms, there were 35.5 crore poor people in 2009-10 against 40.7 crore five years earlier.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>MGNREGS, higher wages help reduce poverty level&nbsp;</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Officials said the sharp decline in poverty between 2004-05 and 2009-10-rural poverty going down by 8 percentage points from 41.8% to 33.8% and urban poverty by 4.8 percentage points from 25.7% to 20.9% - had been aided by high growth, hike in wages and implementation of key schemes like the MGNREGS.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;It is largely due to better agriculture growth and improvement in livelihood,&quot; a senior plan panel official said. According to Crisil, the sharp increase in wages which was near simultaneous across income groups in urban and rural India since 2004-05 boosted consumption demand. Urban and rural wages rose by 12.0-14.0 % over 2004-05 to 2009-10, compared to an increase of 7% in the previous five-year period. Increases in income were especially sharp after 2007-08.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the poverty picture is extremely patchy with some states showing sharp reductions in the proportion of the BPL population while many others saw little or no change and five states in the north-east saw a larger percentage of their populations slipping below the mark. The poverty ratio in Himachal, MP, Maharashtra, Orissa, Sikkim, TN and Uttarakhand has declined by 10 percentage points or more. But in Assam, Meghalaya, Manipur, Mizoram and Nagaland, poverty ratios in 2009-10 are higher than in '04-05. The data showed Bihar, Chhattisgarh and UP have shown only marginal decline in poverty ratio, particularly in rural areas. Given the size of UP and Bihar and the fact the base is already low, this is a worrying sign.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Orissa, which had the highest poverty headcount ratio (57%) in 2004-5, has brought the proportion of poor down to 37% as per the new benchmark. Bihar (53.5%), Chhattisgarh (48.7%) and Manipur (47.1%) now have the three worst poverty headcount ratios. Applying the Tendulkar methodology, on which these figures are based, to 1993-94 data shows that Himachal has been the fastest at reducing poverty, bringing the proportion of people under the poverty line to 9.5%, less than a third of its 1993-4 numbers.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In rural areas, STs showed the highest level of poverty (47.4%), followed by SCs (42.3%), and OBCs (31.9%), against 33.8% for all classes. Among religious groups, Sikhs have the lowest poverty in rural areas (11.9%) while in urban areas, Christians have the lowest proportion (12.9%) of poor.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 13712, 'title' => '5 crore people moved out of poverty: Government', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Data released by the Planning Commission on Monday showed that poverty had significantly declined between 2004-05 and 2009-10. The catch is that this decline is based on a poverty line that is even lower than the earlier Rs 32-per-day mark that had triggered an outrage when the government submitted it to the Supreme Court.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The new estimates are based on a poverty line that averages Rs 672.8 per month (Rs 22.43 per day) in rural areas and Rs 859.6 per month (Rs 28.65 per day) in urban areas for 2009-10. In a state like Delhi, the urban poverty line translates to Rs 34.67 per person per day.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In the Supreme Court, the government had submitted that the updated poverty line was likely to be Rs 26 per day in rural areas and Rs 32 per day in the towns in June 2011.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> As things stand, a host of centrally sponsored social security schemes for the poor exclude those above these poverty lines from availing of the benefits under the schemes.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> By the lowered benchmarks, poverty across the country declined by 7.3 percentage points from 37.2% in 2004-05 to 29.8% in 2009-10. In absolute terms, there were 35.5 crore poor people in 2009-10 against 40.7 crore five years earlier.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>MGNREGS, higher wages help reduce poverty level&nbsp;</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Officials said the sharp decline in poverty between 2004-05 and 2009-10-rural poverty going down by 8 percentage points from 41.8% to 33.8% and urban poverty by 4.8 percentage points from 25.7% to 20.9% - had been aided by high growth, hike in wages and implementation of key schemes like the MGNREGS.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;It is largely due to better agriculture growth and improvement in livelihood,&quot; a senior plan panel official said. According to Crisil, the sharp increase in wages which was near simultaneous across income groups in urban and rural India since 2004-05 boosted consumption demand. Urban and rural wages rose by 12.0-14.0 % over 2004-05 to 2009-10, compared to an increase of 7% in the previous five-year period. Increases in income were especially sharp after 2007-08.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> However, the poverty picture is extremely patchy with some states showing sharp reductions in the proportion of the BPL population while many others saw little or no change and five states in the north-east saw a larger percentage of their populations slipping below the mark. The poverty ratio in Himachal, MP, Maharashtra, Orissa, Sikkim, TN and Uttarakhand has declined by 10 percentage points or more. But in Assam, Meghalaya, Manipur, Mizoram and Nagaland, poverty ratios in 2009-10 are higher than in '04-05. The data showed Bihar, Chhattisgarh and UP have shown only marginal decline in poverty ratio, particularly in rural areas. Given the size of UP and Bihar and the fact the base is already low, this is a worrying sign.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Orissa, which had the highest poverty headcount ratio (57%) in 2004-5, has brought the proportion of poor down to 37% as per the new benchmark. Bihar (53.5%), Chhattisgarh (48.7%) and Manipur (47.1%) now have the three worst poverty headcount ratios. Applying the Tendulkar methodology, on which these figures are based, to 1993-94 data shows that Himachal has been the fastest at reducing poverty, bringing the proportion of people under the poverty line to 9.5%, less than a third of its 1993-4 numbers.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In rural areas, STs showed the highest level of poverty (47.4%), followed by SCs (42.3%), and OBCs (31.9%), against 33.8% for all classes. Among religious groups, Sikhs have the lowest poverty in rural areas (11.9%) while in urban areas, Christians have the lowest proportion (12.9%) of poor. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 20 March, 2012, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/indicators/5-crore-people-moved-out-of-poverty-government/articleshow/12337000.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => '5-crore-people-moved-out-of-poverty-government-13835', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 13835, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 13712 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 5 crore people moved out of poverty: Government' $metaKeywords = 'Poverty,bpl' $metaDesc = ' -The Economic Times Data released by the Planning Commission on Monday showed that poverty had significantly declined between 2004-05 and 2009-10. The catch is that this decline is based on a poverty line that is even lower than the earlier Rs...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Data released by the Planning Commission on Monday showed that poverty had significantly declined between 2004-05 and 2009-10. The catch is that this decline is based on a poverty line that is even lower than the earlier Rs 32-per-day mark that had triggered an outrage when the government submitted it to the Supreme Court.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The new estimates are based on a poverty line that averages Rs 672.8 per month (Rs 22.43 per day) in rural areas and Rs 859.6 per month (Rs 28.65 per day) in urban areas for 2009-10. In a state like Delhi, the urban poverty line translates to Rs 34.67 per person per day.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In the Supreme Court, the government had submitted that the updated poverty line was likely to be Rs 26 per day in rural areas and Rs 32 per day in the towns in June 2011.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">As things stand, a host of centrally sponsored social security schemes for the poor exclude those above these poverty lines from availing of the benefits under the schemes.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">By the lowered benchmarks, poverty across the country declined by 7.3 percentage points from 37.2% in 2004-05 to 29.8% in 2009-10. In absolute terms, there were 35.5 crore poor people in 2009-10 against 40.7 crore five years earlier.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>MGNREGS, higher wages help reduce poverty level&nbsp;</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Officials said the sharp decline in poverty between 2004-05 and 2009-10-rural poverty going down by 8 percentage points from 41.8% to 33.8% and urban poverty by 4.8 percentage points from 25.7% to 20.9% - had been aided by high growth, hike in wages and implementation of key schemes like the MGNREGS.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;It is largely due to better agriculture growth and improvement in livelihood,&quot; a senior plan panel official said. According to Crisil, the sharp increase in wages which was near simultaneous across income groups in urban and rural India since 2004-05 boosted consumption demand. Urban and rural wages rose by 12.0-14.0 % over 2004-05 to 2009-10, compared to an increase of 7% in the previous five-year period. Increases in income were especially sharp after 2007-08.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the poverty picture is extremely patchy with some states showing sharp reductions in the proportion of the BPL population while many others saw little or no change and five states in the north-east saw a larger percentage of their populations slipping below the mark. The poverty ratio in Himachal, MP, Maharashtra, Orissa, Sikkim, TN and Uttarakhand has declined by 10 percentage points or more. But in Assam, Meghalaya, Manipur, Mizoram and Nagaland, poverty ratios in 2009-10 are higher than in '04-05. The data showed Bihar, Chhattisgarh and UP have shown only marginal decline in poverty ratio, particularly in rural areas. Given the size of UP and Bihar and the fact the base is already low, this is a worrying sign.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Orissa, which had the highest poverty headcount ratio (57%) in 2004-5, has brought the proportion of poor down to 37% as per the new benchmark. Bihar (53.5%), Chhattisgarh (48.7%) and Manipur (47.1%) now have the three worst poverty headcount ratios. Applying the Tendulkar methodology, on which these figures are based, to 1993-94 data shows that Himachal has been the fastest at reducing poverty, bringing the proportion of people under the poverty line to 9.5%, less than a third of its 1993-4 numbers.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In rural areas, STs showed the highest level of poverty (47.4%), followed by SCs (42.3%), and OBCs (31.9%), against 33.8% for all classes. Among religious groups, Sikhs have the lowest poverty in rural areas (11.9%) while in urban areas, Christians have the lowest proportion (12.9%) of poor.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/5-crore-people-moved-out-of-poverty-government-13835.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 5 crore people moved out of poverty: Government | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Economic Times Data released by the Planning Commission on Monday showed that poverty had significantly declined between 2004-05 and 2009-10. The catch is that this decline is based on a poverty line that is even lower than the earlier Rs..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>5 crore people moved out of poverty: Government</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Data released by the Planning Commission on Monday showed that poverty had significantly declined between 2004-05 and 2009-10. The catch is that this decline is based on a poverty line that is even lower than the earlier Rs 32-per-day mark that had triggered an outrage when the government submitted it to the Supreme Court. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The new estimates are based on a poverty line that averages Rs 672.8 per month (Rs 22.43 per day) in rural areas and Rs 859.6 per month (Rs 28.65 per day) in urban areas for 2009-10. In a state like Delhi, the urban poverty line translates to Rs 34.67 per person per day. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In the Supreme Court, the government had submitted that the updated poverty line was likely to be Rs 26 per day in rural areas and Rs 32 per day in the towns in June 2011. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">As things stand, a host of centrally sponsored social security schemes for the poor exclude those above these poverty lines from availing of the benefits under the schemes. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">By the lowered benchmarks, poverty across the country declined by 7.3 percentage points from 37.2% in 2004-05 to 29.8% in 2009-10. In absolute terms, there were 35.5 crore poor people in 2009-10 against 40.7 crore five years earlier. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>MGNREGS, higher wages help reduce poverty level </em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Officials said the sharp decline in poverty between 2004-05 and 2009-10-rural poverty going down by 8 percentage points from 41.8% to 33.8% and urban poverty by 4.8 percentage points from 25.7% to 20.9% - had been aided by high growth, hike in wages and implementation of key schemes like the MGNREGS. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"It is largely due to better agriculture growth and improvement in livelihood," a senior plan panel official said. According to Crisil, the sharp increase in wages which was near simultaneous across income groups in urban and rural India since 2004-05 boosted consumption demand. Urban and rural wages rose by 12.0-14.0 % over 2004-05 to 2009-10, compared to an increase of 7% in the previous five-year period. Increases in income were especially sharp after 2007-08. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the poverty picture is extremely patchy with some states showing sharp reductions in the proportion of the BPL population while many others saw little or no change and five states in the north-east saw a larger percentage of their populations slipping below the mark. The poverty ratio in Himachal, MP, Maharashtra, Orissa, Sikkim, TN and Uttarakhand has declined by 10 percentage points or more. But in Assam, Meghalaya, Manipur, Mizoram and Nagaland, poverty ratios in 2009-10 are higher than in '04-05. The data showed Bihar, Chhattisgarh and UP have shown only marginal decline in poverty ratio, particularly in rural areas. Given the size of UP and Bihar and the fact the base is already low, this is a worrying sign. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Orissa, which had the highest poverty headcount ratio (57%) in 2004-5, has brought the proportion of poor down to 37% as per the new benchmark. Bihar (53.5%), Chhattisgarh (48.7%) and Manipur (47.1%) now have the three worst poverty headcount ratios. Applying the Tendulkar methodology, on which these figures are based, to 1993-94 data shows that Himachal has been the fastest at reducing poverty, bringing the proportion of people under the poverty line to 9.5%, less than a third of its 1993-4 numbers. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In rural areas, STs showed the highest level of poverty (47.4%), followed by SCs (42.3%), and OBCs (31.9%), against 33.8% for all classes. Among religious groups, Sikhs have the lowest poverty in rural areas (11.9%) while in urban areas, Christians have the lowest proportion (12.9%) of poor.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 13712, 'title' => '5 crore people moved out of poverty: Government', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Data released by the Planning Commission on Monday showed that poverty had significantly declined between 2004-05 and 2009-10. The catch is that this decline is based on a poverty line that is even lower than the earlier Rs 32-per-day mark that had triggered an outrage when the government submitted it to the Supreme Court. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The new estimates are based on a poverty line that averages Rs 672.8 per month (Rs 22.43 per day) in rural areas and Rs 859.6 per month (Rs 28.65 per day) in urban areas for 2009-10. In a state like Delhi, the urban poverty line translates to Rs 34.67 per person per day. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In the Supreme Court, the government had submitted that the updated poverty line was likely to be Rs 26 per day in rural areas and Rs 32 per day in the towns in June 2011. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> As things stand, a host of centrally sponsored social security schemes for the poor exclude those above these poverty lines from availing of the benefits under the schemes. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> By the lowered benchmarks, poverty across the country declined by 7.3 percentage points from 37.2% in 2004-05 to 29.8% in 2009-10. In absolute terms, there were 35.5 crore poor people in 2009-10 against 40.7 crore five years earlier. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>MGNREGS, higher wages help reduce poverty level </em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Officials said the sharp decline in poverty between 2004-05 and 2009-10-rural poverty going down by 8 percentage points from 41.8% to 33.8% and urban poverty by 4.8 percentage points from 25.7% to 20.9% - had been aided by high growth, hike in wages and implementation of key schemes like the MGNREGS. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> "It is largely due to better agriculture growth and improvement in livelihood," a senior plan panel official said. According to Crisil, the sharp increase in wages which was near simultaneous across income groups in urban and rural India since 2004-05 boosted consumption demand. Urban and rural wages rose by 12.0-14.0 % over 2004-05 to 2009-10, compared to an increase of 7% in the previous five-year period. Increases in income were especially sharp after 2007-08. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> However, the poverty picture is extremely patchy with some states showing sharp reductions in the proportion of the BPL population while many others saw little or no change and five states in the north-east saw a larger percentage of their populations slipping below the mark. The poverty ratio in Himachal, MP, Maharashtra, Orissa, Sikkim, TN and Uttarakhand has declined by 10 percentage points or more. But in Assam, Meghalaya, Manipur, Mizoram and Nagaland, poverty ratios in 2009-10 are higher than in '04-05. The data showed Bihar, Chhattisgarh and UP have shown only marginal decline in poverty ratio, particularly in rural areas. Given the size of UP and Bihar and the fact the base is already low, this is a worrying sign. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Orissa, which had the highest poverty headcount ratio (57%) in 2004-5, has brought the proportion of poor down to 37% as per the new benchmark. Bihar (53.5%), Chhattisgarh (48.7%) and Manipur (47.1%) now have the three worst poverty headcount ratios. Applying the Tendulkar methodology, on which these figures are based, to 1993-94 data shows that Himachal has been the fastest at reducing poverty, bringing the proportion of people under the poverty line to 9.5%, less than a third of its 1993-4 numbers. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In rural areas, STs showed the highest level of poverty (47.4%), followed by SCs (42.3%), and OBCs (31.9%), against 33.8% for all classes. Among religious groups, Sikhs have the lowest poverty in rural areas (11.9%) while in urban areas, Christians have the lowest proportion (12.9%) of poor. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 20 March, 2012, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/indicators/5-crore-people-moved-out-of-poverty-government/articleshow/12337000.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => '5-crore-people-moved-out-of-poverty-government-13835', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 13835, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 13712, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 5 crore people moved out of poverty: Government', 'metaKeywords' => 'Poverty,bpl', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Economic Times Data released by the Planning Commission on Monday showed that poverty had significantly declined between 2004-05 and 2009-10. The catch is that this decline is based on a poverty line that is even lower than the earlier Rs...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Data released by the Planning Commission on Monday showed that poverty had significantly declined between 2004-05 and 2009-10. The catch is that this decline is based on a poverty line that is even lower than the earlier Rs 32-per-day mark that had triggered an outrage when the government submitted it to the Supreme Court. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The new estimates are based on a poverty line that averages Rs 672.8 per month (Rs 22.43 per day) in rural areas and Rs 859.6 per month (Rs 28.65 per day) in urban areas for 2009-10. In a state like Delhi, the urban poverty line translates to Rs 34.67 per person per day. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In the Supreme Court, the government had submitted that the updated poverty line was likely to be Rs 26 per day in rural areas and Rs 32 per day in the towns in June 2011. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">As things stand, a host of centrally sponsored social security schemes for the poor exclude those above these poverty lines from availing of the benefits under the schemes. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">By the lowered benchmarks, poverty across the country declined by 7.3 percentage points from 37.2% in 2004-05 to 29.8% in 2009-10. In absolute terms, there were 35.5 crore poor people in 2009-10 against 40.7 crore five years earlier. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>MGNREGS, higher wages help reduce poverty level </em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Officials said the sharp decline in poverty between 2004-05 and 2009-10-rural poverty going down by 8 percentage points from 41.8% to 33.8% and urban poverty by 4.8 percentage points from 25.7% to 20.9% - had been aided by high growth, hike in wages and implementation of key schemes like the MGNREGS. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"It is largely due to better agriculture growth and improvement in livelihood," a senior plan panel official said. According to Crisil, the sharp increase in wages which was near simultaneous across income groups in urban and rural India since 2004-05 boosted consumption demand. Urban and rural wages rose by 12.0-14.0 % over 2004-05 to 2009-10, compared to an increase of 7% in the previous five-year period. Increases in income were especially sharp after 2007-08. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the poverty picture is extremely patchy with some states showing sharp reductions in the proportion of the BPL population while many others saw little or no change and five states in the north-east saw a larger percentage of their populations slipping below the mark. The poverty ratio in Himachal, MP, Maharashtra, Orissa, Sikkim, TN and Uttarakhand has declined by 10 percentage points or more. But in Assam, Meghalaya, Manipur, Mizoram and Nagaland, poverty ratios in 2009-10 are higher than in '04-05. The data showed Bihar, Chhattisgarh and UP have shown only marginal decline in poverty ratio, particularly in rural areas. Given the size of UP and Bihar and the fact the base is already low, this is a worrying sign. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Orissa, which had the highest poverty headcount ratio (57%) in 2004-5, has brought the proportion of poor down to 37% as per the new benchmark. Bihar (53.5%), Chhattisgarh (48.7%) and Manipur (47.1%) now have the three worst poverty headcount ratios. Applying the Tendulkar methodology, on which these figures are based, to 1993-94 data shows that Himachal has been the fastest at reducing poverty, bringing the proportion of people under the poverty line to 9.5%, less than a third of its 1993-4 numbers. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In rural areas, STs showed the highest level of poverty (47.4%), followed by SCs (42.3%), and OBCs (31.9%), against 33.8% for all classes. Among religious groups, Sikhs have the lowest poverty in rural areas (11.9%) while in urban areas, Christians have the lowest proportion (12.9%) of poor.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 13712, 'title' => '5 crore people moved out of poverty: Government', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -The Economic Times </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Data released by the Planning Commission on Monday showed that poverty had significantly declined between 2004-05 and 2009-10. The catch is that this decline is based on a poverty line that is even lower than the earlier Rs 32-per-day mark that had triggered an outrage when the government submitted it to the Supreme Court. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The new estimates are based on a poverty line that averages Rs 672.8 per month (Rs 22.43 per day) in rural areas and Rs 859.6 per month (Rs 28.65 per day) in urban areas for 2009-10. In a state like Delhi, the urban poverty line translates to Rs 34.67 per person per day. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In the Supreme Court, the government had submitted that the updated poverty line was likely to be Rs 26 per day in rural areas and Rs 32 per day in the towns in June 2011. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> As things stand, a host of centrally sponsored social security schemes for the poor exclude those above these poverty lines from availing of the benefits under the schemes. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> By the lowered benchmarks, poverty across the country declined by 7.3 percentage points from 37.2% in 2004-05 to 29.8% in 2009-10. In absolute terms, there were 35.5 crore poor people in 2009-10 against 40.7 crore five years earlier. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>MGNREGS, higher wages help reduce poverty level </em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Officials said the sharp decline in poverty between 2004-05 and 2009-10-rural poverty going down by 8 percentage points from 41.8% to 33.8% and urban poverty by 4.8 percentage points from 25.7% to 20.9% - had been aided by high growth, hike in wages and implementation of key schemes like the MGNREGS. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> "It is largely due to better agriculture growth and improvement in livelihood," a senior plan panel official said. According to Crisil, the sharp increase in wages which was near simultaneous across income groups in urban and rural India since 2004-05 boosted consumption demand. Urban and rural wages rose by 12.0-14.0 % over 2004-05 to 2009-10, compared to an increase of 7% in the previous five-year period. Increases in income were especially sharp after 2007-08. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> However, the poverty picture is extremely patchy with some states showing sharp reductions in the proportion of the BPL population while many others saw little or no change and five states in the north-east saw a larger percentage of their populations slipping below the mark. The poverty ratio in Himachal, MP, Maharashtra, Orissa, Sikkim, TN and Uttarakhand has declined by 10 percentage points or more. But in Assam, Meghalaya, Manipur, Mizoram and Nagaland, poverty ratios in 2009-10 are higher than in '04-05. The data showed Bihar, Chhattisgarh and UP have shown only marginal decline in poverty ratio, particularly in rural areas. Given the size of UP and Bihar and the fact the base is already low, this is a worrying sign. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Orissa, which had the highest poverty headcount ratio (57%) in 2004-5, has brought the proportion of poor down to 37% as per the new benchmark. Bihar (53.5%), Chhattisgarh (48.7%) and Manipur (47.1%) now have the three worst poverty headcount ratios. Applying the Tendulkar methodology, on which these figures are based, to 1993-94 data shows that Himachal has been the fastest at reducing poverty, bringing the proportion of people under the poverty line to 9.5%, less than a third of its 1993-4 numbers. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In rural areas, STs showed the highest level of poverty (47.4%), followed by SCs (42.3%), and OBCs (31.9%), against 33.8% for all classes. Among religious groups, Sikhs have the lowest poverty in rural areas (11.9%) while in urban areas, Christians have the lowest proportion (12.9%) of poor. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 20 March, 2012, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/indicators/5-crore-people-moved-out-of-poverty-government/articleshow/12337000.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => '5-crore-people-moved-out-of-poverty-government-13835', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 13835, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 13712 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 5 crore people moved out of poverty: Government' $metaKeywords = 'Poverty,bpl' $metaDesc = ' -The Economic Times Data released by the Planning Commission on Monday showed that poverty had significantly declined between 2004-05 and 2009-10. The catch is that this decline is based on a poverty line that is even lower than the earlier Rs...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-The Economic Times</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Data released by the Planning Commission on Monday showed that poverty had significantly declined between 2004-05 and 2009-10. The catch is that this decline is based on a poverty line that is even lower than the earlier Rs 32-per-day mark that had triggered an outrage when the government submitted it to the Supreme Court. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The new estimates are based on a poverty line that averages Rs 672.8 per month (Rs 22.43 per day) in rural areas and Rs 859.6 per month (Rs 28.65 per day) in urban areas for 2009-10. In a state like Delhi, the urban poverty line translates to Rs 34.67 per person per day. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In the Supreme Court, the government had submitted that the updated poverty line was likely to be Rs 26 per day in rural areas and Rs 32 per day in the towns in June 2011. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">As things stand, a host of centrally sponsored social security schemes for the poor exclude those above these poverty lines from availing of the benefits under the schemes. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">By the lowered benchmarks, poverty across the country declined by 7.3 percentage points from 37.2% in 2004-05 to 29.8% in 2009-10. In absolute terms, there were 35.5 crore poor people in 2009-10 against 40.7 crore five years earlier. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>MGNREGS, higher wages help reduce poverty level </em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Officials said the sharp decline in poverty between 2004-05 and 2009-10-rural poverty going down by 8 percentage points from 41.8% to 33.8% and urban poverty by 4.8 percentage points from 25.7% to 20.9% - had been aided by high growth, hike in wages and implementation of key schemes like the MGNREGS. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"It is largely due to better agriculture growth and improvement in livelihood," a senior plan panel official said. According to Crisil, the sharp increase in wages which was near simultaneous across income groups in urban and rural India since 2004-05 boosted consumption demand. Urban and rural wages rose by 12.0-14.0 % over 2004-05 to 2009-10, compared to an increase of 7% in the previous five-year period. Increases in income were especially sharp after 2007-08. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, the poverty picture is extremely patchy with some states showing sharp reductions in the proportion of the BPL population while many others saw little or no change and five states in the north-east saw a larger percentage of their populations slipping below the mark. The poverty ratio in Himachal, MP, Maharashtra, Orissa, Sikkim, TN and Uttarakhand has declined by 10 percentage points or more. But in Assam, Meghalaya, Manipur, Mizoram and Nagaland, poverty ratios in 2009-10 are higher than in '04-05. The data showed Bihar, Chhattisgarh and UP have shown only marginal decline in poverty ratio, particularly in rural areas. Given the size of UP and Bihar and the fact the base is already low, this is a worrying sign. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Orissa, which had the highest poverty headcount ratio (57%) in 2004-5, has brought the proportion of poor down to 37% as per the new benchmark. Bihar (53.5%), Chhattisgarh (48.7%) and Manipur (47.1%) now have the three worst poverty headcount ratios. Applying the Tendulkar methodology, on which these figures are based, to 1993-94 data shows that Himachal has been the fastest at reducing poverty, bringing the proportion of people under the poverty line to 9.5%, less than a third of its 1993-4 numbers. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In rural areas, STs showed the highest level of poverty (47.4%), followed by SCs (42.3%), and OBCs (31.9%), against 33.8% for all classes. Among religious groups, Sikhs have the lowest poverty in rural areas (11.9%) while in urban areas, Christians have the lowest proportion (12.9%) of poor.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
5 crore people moved out of poverty: Government |
-The Economic Times Data released by the Planning Commission on Monday showed that poverty had significantly declined between 2004-05 and 2009-10. The catch is that this decline is based on a poverty line that is even lower than the earlier Rs 32-per-day mark that had triggered an outrage when the government submitted it to the Supreme Court. The new estimates are based on a poverty line that averages Rs 672.8 per month (Rs 22.43 per day) in rural areas and Rs 859.6 per month (Rs 28.65 per day) in urban areas for 2009-10. In a state like Delhi, the urban poverty line translates to Rs 34.67 per person per day. In the Supreme Court, the government had submitted that the updated poverty line was likely to be Rs 26 per day in rural areas and Rs 32 per day in the towns in June 2011. As things stand, a host of centrally sponsored social security schemes for the poor exclude those above these poverty lines from availing of the benefits under the schemes. By the lowered benchmarks, poverty across the country declined by 7.3 percentage points from 37.2% in 2004-05 to 29.8% in 2009-10. In absolute terms, there were 35.5 crore poor people in 2009-10 against 40.7 crore five years earlier. MGNREGS, higher wages help reduce poverty level Officials said the sharp decline in poverty between 2004-05 and 2009-10-rural poverty going down by 8 percentage points from 41.8% to 33.8% and urban poverty by 4.8 percentage points from 25.7% to 20.9% - had been aided by high growth, hike in wages and implementation of key schemes like the MGNREGS. "It is largely due to better agriculture growth and improvement in livelihood," a senior plan panel official said. According to Crisil, the sharp increase in wages which was near simultaneous across income groups in urban and rural India since 2004-05 boosted consumption demand. Urban and rural wages rose by 12.0-14.0 % over 2004-05 to 2009-10, compared to an increase of 7% in the previous five-year period. Increases in income were especially sharp after 2007-08. However, the poverty picture is extremely patchy with some states showing sharp reductions in the proportion of the BPL population while many others saw little or no change and five states in the north-east saw a larger percentage of their populations slipping below the mark. The poverty ratio in Himachal, MP, Maharashtra, Orissa, Sikkim, TN and Uttarakhand has declined by 10 percentage points or more. But in Assam, Meghalaya, Manipur, Mizoram and Nagaland, poverty ratios in 2009-10 are higher than in '04-05. The data showed Bihar, Chhattisgarh and UP have shown only marginal decline in poverty ratio, particularly in rural areas. Given the size of UP and Bihar and the fact the base is already low, this is a worrying sign. Orissa, which had the highest poverty headcount ratio (57%) in 2004-5, has brought the proportion of poor down to 37% as per the new benchmark. Bihar (53.5%), Chhattisgarh (48.7%) and Manipur (47.1%) now have the three worst poverty headcount ratios. Applying the Tendulkar methodology, on which these figures are based, to 1993-94 data shows that Himachal has been the fastest at reducing poverty, bringing the proportion of people under the poverty line to 9.5%, less than a third of its 1993-4 numbers. In rural areas, STs showed the highest level of poverty (47.4%), followed by SCs (42.3%), and OBCs (31.9%), against 33.8% for all classes. Among religious groups, Sikhs have the lowest poverty in rural areas (11.9%) while in urban areas, Christians have the lowest proportion (12.9%) of poor.
|