Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/66a-warning-for-bengal-22724/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/66a-warning-for-bengal-22724/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/66a-warning-for-bengal-22724/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/66a-warning-for-bengal-22724/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f1406b8264b-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f1406b8264b-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f1406b8264b-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f1406b8264b-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f1406b8264b-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f1406b8264b-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f1406b8264b-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f1406b8264b-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f1406b8264b-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 22574,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;66A warning for Bengal&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The Supreme Court today warned Bengal and Andhra Pradesh with &amp;quot;consequences&amp;quot; if they failed to respond to an eight-month-old directive relating to a law that has led to arrests over &amp;quot;objectionable&amp;quot; Internet posts.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
On January 19, the court had asked all states and Union territories to respond to a central advisory that said no arrests should be made under Section 66A of the Information Technology Act without sanction from a senior officer of certain specified ranks.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;quot;If they (Bengal and Andhra) don&#039;t file it (replies), they will face the consequences. Anyway, we are giving them one more opportunity. Let them file their response within four weeks,&amp;quot; the bench of Justices H.L. Gokhale and Dipak Misra said.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Many individuals have been arrested under 66A for Internet posts the authorities viewed as &amp;quot;objectionable&amp;quot;. Among them was Jadavpur University professor Ambikesh Mahapatra who was accused of circulating an Internet joke lampooning Bengal chief minister Mamata Banerjee.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
This and a spate of other arrests under the clause had led to a public interest litigation challenging the constitutional validity of Section 66A on the ground that it infringed on individuals&#039; fundamental rights. That case is now before a larger apex court bench.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
On January 9, the Centre had issued the advisory saying no arrests should be made under the section without prior approval of an officer not below the rank of inspector-general in cities, or an officer not below the rank of deputy commissioner or superintendent in the districts.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Today, counsel for petitioner Shreya Singhal complained that Andhra and Bengal, both of which had a record of filing cases under the controversial section, were yet to send their responses.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In this context, the court reiterated its August 16 observation that individuals&#039; right to free speech must be balanced with the state&#039;s power to restrict rumours that could create public disaffection.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
At the last hearing, the court had cited the recent exodus, from many parts of the country, by people from the Northeast following rumours of impending attacks on them in the wake of certain incidents in Myanmar.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Singhal&#039;s PIL was filed last year after the arrest of two teenaged girls in Maharashtra for posting and &amp;quot;liking&amp;quot; on Facebook a remark questioning the shutdown on the day Shiv Sena leader Bal Thackeray was cremated.
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 21 September, 2013, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1130921/jsp/nation/story_17374546.jsp#.Uj1CLn_cjco&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;66a-warning-for-bengal-22724&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 22724,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 22574,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 66A warning for Bengal&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;social media,Freedom of Speech,internet,Law and Justice,Supreme Court&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Telegraph



New Delhi: The Supreme Court today warned Bengal and Andhra Pradesh with &amp;quot;consequences&amp;quot; if they failed to respond to an eight-month-old directive relating to a law that has led to arrests over &amp;quot;objectionable&amp;quot; Internet posts.


On January 19, the court...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The Supreme Court today warned Bengal and Andhra Pradesh with &amp;quot;consequences&amp;quot; if they failed to respond to an eight-month-old directive relating to a law that has led to arrests over &amp;quot;objectionable&amp;quot; Internet posts.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;On January 19, the court had asked all states and Union territories to respond to a central advisory that said no arrests should be made under Section 66A of the Information Technology Act without sanction from a senior officer of certain specified ranks.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;If they (Bengal and Andhra) don&#039;t file it (replies), they will face the consequences. Anyway, we are giving them one more opportunity. Let them file their response within four weeks,&amp;quot; the bench of Justices H.L. Gokhale and Dipak Misra said.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Many individuals have been arrested under 66A for Internet posts the authorities viewed as &amp;quot;objectionable&amp;quot;. Among them was Jadavpur University professor Ambikesh Mahapatra who was accused of circulating an Internet joke lampooning Bengal chief minister Mamata Banerjee.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;This and a spate of other arrests under the clause had led to a public interest litigation challenging the constitutional validity of Section 66A on the ground that it infringed on individuals&#039; fundamental rights. That case is now before a larger apex court bench.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;On January 9, the Centre had issued the advisory saying no arrests should be made under the section without prior approval of an officer not below the rank of inspector-general in cities, or an officer not below the rank of deputy commissioner or superintendent in the districts.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Today, counsel for petitioner Shreya Singhal complained that Andhra and Bengal, both of which had a record of filing cases under the controversial section, were yet to send their responses.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In this context, the court reiterated its August 16 observation that individuals&#039; right to free speech must be balanced with the state&#039;s power to restrict rumours that could create public disaffection.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;At the last hearing, the court had cited the recent exodus, from many parts of the country, by people from the Northeast following rumours of impending attacks on them in the wake of certain incidents in Myanmar.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Singhal&#039;s PIL was filed last year after the arrest of two teenaged girls in Maharashtra for posting and &amp;quot;liking&amp;quot; on Facebook a remark questioning the shutdown on the day Shiv Sena leader Bal Thackeray was cremated.&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 22574,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;66A warning for Bengal&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The Supreme Court today warned Bengal and Andhra Pradesh with &amp;quot;consequences&amp;quot; if they failed to respond to an eight-month-old directive relating to a law that has led to arrests over &amp;quot;objectionable&amp;quot; Internet posts.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
On January 19, the court had asked all states and Union territories to respond to a central advisory that said no arrests should be made under Section 66A of the Information Technology Act without sanction from a senior officer of certain specified ranks.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;quot;If they (Bengal and Andhra) don&#039;t file it (replies), they will face the consequences. Anyway, we are giving them one more opportunity. Let them file their response within four weeks,&amp;quot; the bench of Justices H.L. Gokhale and Dipak Misra said.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Many individuals have been arrested under 66A for Internet posts the authorities viewed as &amp;quot;objectionable&amp;quot;. Among them was Jadavpur University professor Ambikesh Mahapatra who was accused of circulating an Internet joke lampooning Bengal chief minister Mamata Banerjee.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
This and a spate of other arrests under the clause had led to a public interest litigation challenging the constitutional validity of Section 66A on the ground that it infringed on individuals&#039; fundamental rights. That case is now before a larger apex court bench.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
On January 9, the Centre had issued the advisory saying no arrests should be made under the section without prior approval of an officer not below the rank of inspector-general in cities, or an officer not below the rank of deputy commissioner or superintendent in the districts.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Today, counsel for petitioner Shreya Singhal complained that Andhra and Bengal, both of which had a record of filing cases under the controversial section, were yet to send their responses.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In this context, the court reiterated its August 16 observation that individuals&#039; right to free speech must be balanced with the state&#039;s power to restrict rumours that could create public disaffection.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
At the last hearing, the court had cited the recent exodus, from many parts of the country, by people from the Northeast following rumours of impending attacks on them in the wake of certain incidents in Myanmar.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Singhal&#039;s PIL was filed last year after the arrest of two teenaged girls in Maharashtra for posting and &amp;quot;liking&amp;quot; on Facebook a remark questioning the shutdown on the day Shiv Sena leader Bal Thackeray was cremated.
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 21 September, 2013, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1130921/jsp/nation/story_17374546.jsp#.Uj1CLn_cjco&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;66a-warning-for-bengal-22724&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 22724,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 22574
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 66A warning for Bengal&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;social media,Freedom of Speech,internet,Law and Justice,Supreme Court&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Telegraph



New Delhi: The Supreme Court today warned Bengal and Andhra Pradesh with &amp;quot;consequences&amp;quot; if they failed to respond to an eight-month-old directive relating to a law that has led to arrests over &amp;quot;objectionable&amp;quot; Internet posts.


On January 19, the court...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The Supreme Court today warned Bengal and Andhra Pradesh with &amp;quot;consequences&amp;quot; if they failed to respond to an eight-month-old directive relating to a law that has led to arrests over &amp;quot;objectionable&amp;quot; Internet posts.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;On January 19, the court had asked all states and Union territories to respond to a central advisory that said no arrests should be made under Section 66A of the Information Technology Act without sanction from a senior officer of certain specified ranks.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;If they (Bengal and Andhra) don&#039;t file it (replies), they will face the consequences. Anyway, we are giving them one more opportunity. Let them file their response within four weeks,&amp;quot; the bench of Justices H.L. Gokhale and Dipak Misra said.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Many individuals have been arrested under 66A for Internet posts the authorities viewed as &amp;quot;objectionable&amp;quot;. Among them was Jadavpur University professor Ambikesh Mahapatra who was accused of circulating an Internet joke lampooning Bengal chief minister Mamata Banerjee.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;This and a spate of other arrests under the clause had led to a public interest litigation challenging the constitutional validity of Section 66A on the ground that it infringed on individuals&#039; fundamental rights. That case is now before a larger apex court bench.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;On January 9, the Centre had issued the advisory saying no arrests should be made under the section without prior approval of an officer not below the rank of inspector-general in cities, or an officer not below the rank of deputy commissioner or superintendent in the districts.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Today, counsel for petitioner Shreya Singhal complained that Andhra and Bengal, both of which had a record of filing cases under the controversial section, were yet to send their responses.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In this context, the court reiterated its August 16 observation that individuals&#039; right to free speech must be balanced with the state&#039;s power to restrict rumours that could create public disaffection.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;At the last hearing, the court had cited the recent exodus, from many parts of the country, by people from the Northeast following rumours of impending attacks on them in the wake of certain incidents in Myanmar.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Singhal&#039;s PIL was filed last year after the arrest of two teenaged girls in Maharashtra for posting and &amp;quot;liking&amp;quot; on Facebook a remark questioning the shutdown on the day Shiv Sena leader Bal Thackeray was cremated.&lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/66a-warning-for-bengal-22724.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 66A warning for Bengal | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Telegraph



New Delhi: The Supreme Court today warned Bengal and Andhra Pradesh with &quot;consequences&quot; if they failed to respond to an eight-month-old directive relating to a law that has led to arrests over &quot;objectionable&quot; Internet posts.


On January 19, the court..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>66A warning for Bengal</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>The Supreme Court today warned Bengal and Andhra Pradesh with &quot;consequences&quot; if they failed to respond to an eight-month-old directive relating to a law that has led to arrests over &quot;objectionable&quot; Internet posts.</p><p align="justify">On January 19, the court had asked all states and Union territories to respond to a central advisory that said no arrests should be made under Section 66A of the Information Technology Act without sanction from a senior officer of certain specified ranks.</p><p align="justify">&quot;If they (Bengal and Andhra) don't file it (replies), they will face the consequences. Anyway, we are giving them one more opportunity. Let them file their response within four weeks,&quot; the bench of Justices H.L. Gokhale and Dipak Misra said.</p><p align="justify">Many individuals have been arrested under 66A for Internet posts the authorities viewed as &quot;objectionable&quot;. Among them was Jadavpur University professor Ambikesh Mahapatra who was accused of circulating an Internet joke lampooning Bengal chief minister Mamata Banerjee.</p><p align="justify">This and a spate of other arrests under the clause had led to a public interest litigation challenging the constitutional validity of Section 66A on the ground that it infringed on individuals' fundamental rights. That case is now before a larger apex court bench.</p><p align="justify">On January 9, the Centre had issued the advisory saying no arrests should be made under the section without prior approval of an officer not below the rank of inspector-general in cities, or an officer not below the rank of deputy commissioner or superintendent in the districts.</p><p align="justify">Today, counsel for petitioner Shreya Singhal complained that Andhra and Bengal, both of which had a record of filing cases under the controversial section, were yet to send their responses.</p><p align="justify">In this context, the court reiterated its August 16 observation that individuals' right to free speech must be balanced with the state's power to restrict rumours that could create public disaffection.</p><p align="justify">At the last hearing, the court had cited the recent exodus, from many parts of the country, by people from the Northeast following rumours of impending attacks on them in the wake of certain incidents in Myanmar.</p><p align="justify">Singhal's PIL was filed last year after the arrest of two teenaged girls in Maharashtra for posting and &quot;liking&quot; on Facebook a remark questioning the shutdown on the day Shiv Sena leader Bal Thackeray was cremated.</p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f1406b8264b-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f1406b8264b-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f1406b8264b-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f1406b8264b-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f1406b8264b-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f1406b8264b-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f1406b8264b-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f1406b8264b-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f1406b8264b-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 22574,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;66A warning for Bengal&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The Supreme Court today warned Bengal and Andhra Pradesh with &amp;quot;consequences&amp;quot; if they failed to respond to an eight-month-old directive relating to a law that has led to arrests over &amp;quot;objectionable&amp;quot; Internet posts.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
On January 19, the court had asked all states and Union territories to respond to a central advisory that said no arrests should be made under Section 66A of the Information Technology Act without sanction from a senior officer of certain specified ranks.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;quot;If they (Bengal and Andhra) don&#039;t file it (replies), they will face the consequences. Anyway, we are giving them one more opportunity. Let them file their response within four weeks,&amp;quot; the bench of Justices H.L. Gokhale and Dipak Misra said.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Many individuals have been arrested under 66A for Internet posts the authorities viewed as &amp;quot;objectionable&amp;quot;. Among them was Jadavpur University professor Ambikesh Mahapatra who was accused of circulating an Internet joke lampooning Bengal chief minister Mamata Banerjee.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
This and a spate of other arrests under the clause had led to a public interest litigation challenging the constitutional validity of Section 66A on the ground that it infringed on individuals&#039; fundamental rights. That case is now before a larger apex court bench.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
On January 9, the Centre had issued the advisory saying no arrests should be made under the section without prior approval of an officer not below the rank of inspector-general in cities, or an officer not below the rank of deputy commissioner or superintendent in the districts.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Today, counsel for petitioner Shreya Singhal complained that Andhra and Bengal, both of which had a record of filing cases under the controversial section, were yet to send their responses.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In this context, the court reiterated its August 16 observation that individuals&#039; right to free speech must be balanced with the state&#039;s power to restrict rumours that could create public disaffection.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
At the last hearing, the court had cited the recent exodus, from many parts of the country, by people from the Northeast following rumours of impending attacks on them in the wake of certain incidents in Myanmar.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Singhal&#039;s PIL was filed last year after the arrest of two teenaged girls in Maharashtra for posting and &amp;quot;liking&amp;quot; on Facebook a remark questioning the shutdown on the day Shiv Sena leader Bal Thackeray was cremated.
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 21 September, 2013, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1130921/jsp/nation/story_17374546.jsp#.Uj1CLn_cjco&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;66a-warning-for-bengal-22724&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 22724,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 22574,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 66A warning for Bengal&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;social media,Freedom of Speech,internet,Law and Justice,Supreme Court&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Telegraph



New Delhi: The Supreme Court today warned Bengal and Andhra Pradesh with &amp;quot;consequences&amp;quot; if they failed to respond to an eight-month-old directive relating to a law that has led to arrests over &amp;quot;objectionable&amp;quot; Internet posts.


On January 19, the court...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The Supreme Court today warned Bengal and Andhra Pradesh with &amp;quot;consequences&amp;quot; if they failed to respond to an eight-month-old directive relating to a law that has led to arrests over &amp;quot;objectionable&amp;quot; Internet posts.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;On January 19, the court had asked all states and Union territories to respond to a central advisory that said no arrests should be made under Section 66A of the Information Technology Act without sanction from a senior officer of certain specified ranks.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;If they (Bengal and Andhra) don&#039;t file it (replies), they will face the consequences. Anyway, we are giving them one more opportunity. Let them file their response within four weeks,&amp;quot; the bench of Justices H.L. Gokhale and Dipak Misra said.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Many individuals have been arrested under 66A for Internet posts the authorities viewed as &amp;quot;objectionable&amp;quot;. Among them was Jadavpur University professor Ambikesh Mahapatra who was accused of circulating an Internet joke lampooning Bengal chief minister Mamata Banerjee.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;This and a spate of other arrests under the clause had led to a public interest litigation challenging the constitutional validity of Section 66A on the ground that it infringed on individuals&#039; fundamental rights. That case is now before a larger apex court bench.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;On January 9, the Centre had issued the advisory saying no arrests should be made under the section without prior approval of an officer not below the rank of inspector-general in cities, or an officer not below the rank of deputy commissioner or superintendent in the districts.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Today, counsel for petitioner Shreya Singhal complained that Andhra and Bengal, both of which had a record of filing cases under the controversial section, were yet to send their responses.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In this context, the court reiterated its August 16 observation that individuals&#039; right to free speech must be balanced with the state&#039;s power to restrict rumours that could create public disaffection.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;At the last hearing, the court had cited the recent exodus, from many parts of the country, by people from the Northeast following rumours of impending attacks on them in the wake of certain incidents in Myanmar.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Singhal&#039;s PIL was filed last year after the arrest of two teenaged girls in Maharashtra for posting and &amp;quot;liking&amp;quot; on Facebook a remark questioning the shutdown on the day Shiv Sena leader Bal Thackeray was cremated.&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 22574,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;66A warning for Bengal&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The Supreme Court today warned Bengal and Andhra Pradesh with &amp;quot;consequences&amp;quot; if they failed to respond to an eight-month-old directive relating to a law that has led to arrests over &amp;quot;objectionable&amp;quot; Internet posts.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
On January 19, the court had asked all states and Union territories to respond to a central advisory that said no arrests should be made under Section 66A of the Information Technology Act without sanction from a senior officer of certain specified ranks.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;quot;If they (Bengal and Andhra) don&#039;t file it (replies), they will face the consequences. Anyway, we are giving them one more opportunity. Let them file their response within four weeks,&amp;quot; the bench of Justices H.L. Gokhale and Dipak Misra said.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Many individuals have been arrested under 66A for Internet posts the authorities viewed as &amp;quot;objectionable&amp;quot;. Among them was Jadavpur University professor Ambikesh Mahapatra who was accused of circulating an Internet joke lampooning Bengal chief minister Mamata Banerjee.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
This and a spate of other arrests under the clause had led to a public interest litigation challenging the constitutional validity of Section 66A on the ground that it infringed on individuals&#039; fundamental rights. That case is now before a larger apex court bench.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
On January 9, the Centre had issued the advisory saying no arrests should be made under the section without prior approval of an officer not below the rank of inspector-general in cities, or an officer not below the rank of deputy commissioner or superintendent in the districts.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Today, counsel for petitioner Shreya Singhal complained that Andhra and Bengal, both of which had a record of filing cases under the controversial section, were yet to send their responses.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In this context, the court reiterated its August 16 observation that individuals&#039; right to free speech must be balanced with the state&#039;s power to restrict rumours that could create public disaffection.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
At the last hearing, the court had cited the recent exodus, from many parts of the country, by people from the Northeast following rumours of impending attacks on them in the wake of certain incidents in Myanmar.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Singhal&#039;s PIL was filed last year after the arrest of two teenaged girls in Maharashtra for posting and &amp;quot;liking&amp;quot; on Facebook a remark questioning the shutdown on the day Shiv Sena leader Bal Thackeray was cremated.
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 21 September, 2013, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1130921/jsp/nation/story_17374546.jsp#.Uj1CLn_cjco&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;66a-warning-for-bengal-22724&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 22724,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 22574
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 66A warning for Bengal&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;social media,Freedom of Speech,internet,Law and Justice,Supreme Court&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Telegraph



New Delhi: The Supreme Court today warned Bengal and Andhra Pradesh with &amp;quot;consequences&amp;quot; if they failed to respond to an eight-month-old directive relating to a law that has led to arrests over &amp;quot;objectionable&amp;quot; Internet posts.


On January 19, the court...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The Supreme Court today warned Bengal and Andhra Pradesh with &amp;quot;consequences&amp;quot; if they failed to respond to an eight-month-old directive relating to a law that has led to arrests over &amp;quot;objectionable&amp;quot; Internet posts.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;On January 19, the court had asked all states and Union territories to respond to a central advisory that said no arrests should be made under Section 66A of the Information Technology Act without sanction from a senior officer of certain specified ranks.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;If they (Bengal and Andhra) don&#039;t file it (replies), they will face the consequences. Anyway, we are giving them one more opportunity. Let them file their response within four weeks,&amp;quot; the bench of Justices H.L. Gokhale and Dipak Misra said.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Many individuals have been arrested under 66A for Internet posts the authorities viewed as &amp;quot;objectionable&amp;quot;. Among them was Jadavpur University professor Ambikesh Mahapatra who was accused of circulating an Internet joke lampooning Bengal chief minister Mamata Banerjee.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;This and a spate of other arrests under the clause had led to a public interest litigation challenging the constitutional validity of Section 66A on the ground that it infringed on individuals&#039; fundamental rights. That case is now before a larger apex court bench.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;On January 9, the Centre had issued the advisory saying no arrests should be made under the section without prior approval of an officer not below the rank of inspector-general in cities, or an officer not below the rank of deputy commissioner or superintendent in the districts.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Today, counsel for petitioner Shreya Singhal complained that Andhra and Bengal, both of which had a record of filing cases under the controversial section, were yet to send their responses.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In this context, the court reiterated its August 16 observation that individuals&#039; right to free speech must be balanced with the state&#039;s power to restrict rumours that could create public disaffection.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;At the last hearing, the court had cited the recent exodus, from many parts of the country, by people from the Northeast following rumours of impending attacks on them in the wake of certain incidents in Myanmar.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Singhal&#039;s PIL was filed last year after the arrest of two teenaged girls in Maharashtra for posting and &amp;quot;liking&amp;quot; on Facebook a remark questioning the shutdown on the day Shiv Sena leader Bal Thackeray was cremated.&lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/66a-warning-for-bengal-22724.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 66A warning for Bengal | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Telegraph



New Delhi: The Supreme Court today warned Bengal and Andhra Pradesh with &quot;consequences&quot; if they failed to respond to an eight-month-old directive relating to a law that has led to arrests over &quot;objectionable&quot; Internet posts.


On January 19, the court..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>66A warning for Bengal</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>The Supreme Court today warned Bengal and Andhra Pradesh with &quot;consequences&quot; if they failed to respond to an eight-month-old directive relating to a law that has led to arrests over &quot;objectionable&quot; Internet posts.</p><p align="justify">On January 19, the court had asked all states and Union territories to respond to a central advisory that said no arrests should be made under Section 66A of the Information Technology Act without sanction from a senior officer of certain specified ranks.</p><p align="justify">&quot;If they (Bengal and Andhra) don't file it (replies), they will face the consequences. Anyway, we are giving them one more opportunity. Let them file their response within four weeks,&quot; the bench of Justices H.L. Gokhale and Dipak Misra said.</p><p align="justify">Many individuals have been arrested under 66A for Internet posts the authorities viewed as &quot;objectionable&quot;. Among them was Jadavpur University professor Ambikesh Mahapatra who was accused of circulating an Internet joke lampooning Bengal chief minister Mamata Banerjee.</p><p align="justify">This and a spate of other arrests under the clause had led to a public interest litigation challenging the constitutional validity of Section 66A on the ground that it infringed on individuals' fundamental rights. That case is now before a larger apex court bench.</p><p align="justify">On January 9, the Centre had issued the advisory saying no arrests should be made under the section without prior approval of an officer not below the rank of inspector-general in cities, or an officer not below the rank of deputy commissioner or superintendent in the districts.</p><p align="justify">Today, counsel for petitioner Shreya Singhal complained that Andhra and Bengal, both of which had a record of filing cases under the controversial section, were yet to send their responses.</p><p align="justify">In this context, the court reiterated its August 16 observation that individuals' right to free speech must be balanced with the state's power to restrict rumours that could create public disaffection.</p><p align="justify">At the last hearing, the court had cited the recent exodus, from many parts of the country, by people from the Northeast following rumours of impending attacks on them in the wake of certain incidents in Myanmar.</p><p align="justify">Singhal's PIL was filed last year after the arrest of two teenaged girls in Maharashtra for posting and &quot;liking&quot; on Facebook a remark questioning the shutdown on the day Shiv Sena leader Bal Thackeray was cremated.</p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f1406b8264b-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f1406b8264b-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f1406b8264b-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f1406b8264b-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f1406b8264b-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f1406b8264b-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f1406b8264b-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f1406b8264b-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f1406b8264b-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 22574,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;66A warning for Bengal&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The Supreme Court today warned Bengal and Andhra Pradesh with &amp;quot;consequences&amp;quot; if they failed to respond to an eight-month-old directive relating to a law that has led to arrests over &amp;quot;objectionable&amp;quot; Internet posts.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
On January 19, the court had asked all states and Union territories to respond to a central advisory that said no arrests should be made under Section 66A of the Information Technology Act without sanction from a senior officer of certain specified ranks.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;quot;If they (Bengal and Andhra) don&#039;t file it (replies), they will face the consequences. Anyway, we are giving them one more opportunity. Let them file their response within four weeks,&amp;quot; the bench of Justices H.L. Gokhale and Dipak Misra said.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Many individuals have been arrested under 66A for Internet posts the authorities viewed as &amp;quot;objectionable&amp;quot;. Among them was Jadavpur University professor Ambikesh Mahapatra who was accused of circulating an Internet joke lampooning Bengal chief minister Mamata Banerjee.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
This and a spate of other arrests under the clause had led to a public interest litigation challenging the constitutional validity of Section 66A on the ground that it infringed on individuals&#039; fundamental rights. That case is now before a larger apex court bench.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
On January 9, the Centre had issued the advisory saying no arrests should be made under the section without prior approval of an officer not below the rank of inspector-general in cities, or an officer not below the rank of deputy commissioner or superintendent in the districts.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Today, counsel for petitioner Shreya Singhal complained that Andhra and Bengal, both of which had a record of filing cases under the controversial section, were yet to send their responses.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In this context, the court reiterated its August 16 observation that individuals&#039; right to free speech must be balanced with the state&#039;s power to restrict rumours that could create public disaffection.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
At the last hearing, the court had cited the recent exodus, from many parts of the country, by people from the Northeast following rumours of impending attacks on them in the wake of certain incidents in Myanmar.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Singhal&#039;s PIL was filed last year after the arrest of two teenaged girls in Maharashtra for posting and &amp;quot;liking&amp;quot; on Facebook a remark questioning the shutdown on the day Shiv Sena leader Bal Thackeray was cremated.
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 21 September, 2013, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1130921/jsp/nation/story_17374546.jsp#.Uj1CLn_cjco&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;66a-warning-for-bengal-22724&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 22724,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 22574,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 66A warning for Bengal&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;social media,Freedom of Speech,internet,Law and Justice,Supreme Court&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Telegraph



New Delhi: The Supreme Court today warned Bengal and Andhra Pradesh with &amp;quot;consequences&amp;quot; if they failed to respond to an eight-month-old directive relating to a law that has led to arrests over &amp;quot;objectionable&amp;quot; Internet posts.


On January 19, the court...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The Supreme Court today warned Bengal and Andhra Pradesh with &amp;quot;consequences&amp;quot; if they failed to respond to an eight-month-old directive relating to a law that has led to arrests over &amp;quot;objectionable&amp;quot; Internet posts.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;On January 19, the court had asked all states and Union territories to respond to a central advisory that said no arrests should be made under Section 66A of the Information Technology Act without sanction from a senior officer of certain specified ranks.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;If they (Bengal and Andhra) don&#039;t file it (replies), they will face the consequences. Anyway, we are giving them one more opportunity. Let them file their response within four weeks,&amp;quot; the bench of Justices H.L. Gokhale and Dipak Misra said.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Many individuals have been arrested under 66A for Internet posts the authorities viewed as &amp;quot;objectionable&amp;quot;. Among them was Jadavpur University professor Ambikesh Mahapatra who was accused of circulating an Internet joke lampooning Bengal chief minister Mamata Banerjee.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;This and a spate of other arrests under the clause had led to a public interest litigation challenging the constitutional validity of Section 66A on the ground that it infringed on individuals&#039; fundamental rights. That case is now before a larger apex court bench.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;On January 9, the Centre had issued the advisory saying no arrests should be made under the section without prior approval of an officer not below the rank of inspector-general in cities, or an officer not below the rank of deputy commissioner or superintendent in the districts.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Today, counsel for petitioner Shreya Singhal complained that Andhra and Bengal, both of which had a record of filing cases under the controversial section, were yet to send their responses.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In this context, the court reiterated its August 16 observation that individuals&#039; right to free speech must be balanced with the state&#039;s power to restrict rumours that could create public disaffection.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;At the last hearing, the court had cited the recent exodus, from many parts of the country, by people from the Northeast following rumours of impending attacks on them in the wake of certain incidents in Myanmar.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Singhal&#039;s PIL was filed last year after the arrest of two teenaged girls in Maharashtra for posting and &amp;quot;liking&amp;quot; on Facebook a remark questioning the shutdown on the day Shiv Sena leader Bal Thackeray was cremated.&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 22574,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;66A warning for Bengal&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The Supreme Court today warned Bengal and Andhra Pradesh with &amp;quot;consequences&amp;quot; if they failed to respond to an eight-month-old directive relating to a law that has led to arrests over &amp;quot;objectionable&amp;quot; Internet posts.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
On January 19, the court had asked all states and Union territories to respond to a central advisory that said no arrests should be made under Section 66A of the Information Technology Act without sanction from a senior officer of certain specified ranks.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;quot;If they (Bengal and Andhra) don&#039;t file it (replies), they will face the consequences. Anyway, we are giving them one more opportunity. Let them file their response within four weeks,&amp;quot; the bench of Justices H.L. Gokhale and Dipak Misra said.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Many individuals have been arrested under 66A for Internet posts the authorities viewed as &amp;quot;objectionable&amp;quot;. Among them was Jadavpur University professor Ambikesh Mahapatra who was accused of circulating an Internet joke lampooning Bengal chief minister Mamata Banerjee.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
This and a spate of other arrests under the clause had led to a public interest litigation challenging the constitutional validity of Section 66A on the ground that it infringed on individuals&#039; fundamental rights. That case is now before a larger apex court bench.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
On January 9, the Centre had issued the advisory saying no arrests should be made under the section without prior approval of an officer not below the rank of inspector-general in cities, or an officer not below the rank of deputy commissioner or superintendent in the districts.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Today, counsel for petitioner Shreya Singhal complained that Andhra and Bengal, both of which had a record of filing cases under the controversial section, were yet to send their responses.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In this context, the court reiterated its August 16 observation that individuals&#039; right to free speech must be balanced with the state&#039;s power to restrict rumours that could create public disaffection.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
At the last hearing, the court had cited the recent exodus, from many parts of the country, by people from the Northeast following rumours of impending attacks on them in the wake of certain incidents in Myanmar.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Singhal&#039;s PIL was filed last year after the arrest of two teenaged girls in Maharashtra for posting and &amp;quot;liking&amp;quot; on Facebook a remark questioning the shutdown on the day Shiv Sena leader Bal Thackeray was cremated.
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 21 September, 2013, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1130921/jsp/nation/story_17374546.jsp#.Uj1CLn_cjco&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;66a-warning-for-bengal-22724&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 22724,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 22574
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 66A warning for Bengal&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;social media,Freedom of Speech,internet,Law and Justice,Supreme Court&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Telegraph



New Delhi: The Supreme Court today warned Bengal and Andhra Pradesh with &amp;quot;consequences&amp;quot; if they failed to respond to an eight-month-old directive relating to a law that has led to arrests over &amp;quot;objectionable&amp;quot; Internet posts.


On January 19, the court...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The Supreme Court today warned Bengal and Andhra Pradesh with &amp;quot;consequences&amp;quot; if they failed to respond to an eight-month-old directive relating to a law that has led to arrests over &amp;quot;objectionable&amp;quot; Internet posts.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;On January 19, the court had asked all states and Union territories to respond to a central advisory that said no arrests should be made under Section 66A of the Information Technology Act without sanction from a senior officer of certain specified ranks.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;If they (Bengal and Andhra) don&#039;t file it (replies), they will face the consequences. Anyway, we are giving them one more opportunity. Let them file their response within four weeks,&amp;quot; the bench of Justices H.L. Gokhale and Dipak Misra said.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Many individuals have been arrested under 66A for Internet posts the authorities viewed as &amp;quot;objectionable&amp;quot;. Among them was Jadavpur University professor Ambikesh Mahapatra who was accused of circulating an Internet joke lampooning Bengal chief minister Mamata Banerjee.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;This and a spate of other arrests under the clause had led to a public interest litigation challenging the constitutional validity of Section 66A on the ground that it infringed on individuals&#039; fundamental rights. That case is now before a larger apex court bench.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;On January 9, the Centre had issued the advisory saying no arrests should be made under the section without prior approval of an officer not below the rank of inspector-general in cities, or an officer not below the rank of deputy commissioner or superintendent in the districts.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Today, counsel for petitioner Shreya Singhal complained that Andhra and Bengal, both of which had a record of filing cases under the controversial section, were yet to send their responses.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In this context, the court reiterated its August 16 observation that individuals&#039; right to free speech must be balanced with the state&#039;s power to restrict rumours that could create public disaffection.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;At the last hearing, the court had cited the recent exodus, from many parts of the country, by people from the Northeast following rumours of impending attacks on them in the wake of certain incidents in Myanmar.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Singhal&#039;s PIL was filed last year after the arrest of two teenaged girls in Maharashtra for posting and &amp;quot;liking&amp;quot; on Facebook a remark questioning the shutdown on the day Shiv Sena leader Bal Thackeray was cremated.&lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/66a-warning-for-bengal-22724.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 66A warning for Bengal | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Telegraph



New Delhi: The Supreme Court today warned Bengal and Andhra Pradesh with &quot;consequences&quot; if they failed to respond to an eight-month-old directive relating to a law that has led to arrests over &quot;objectionable&quot; Internet posts.


On January 19, the court..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>66A warning for Bengal</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>The Supreme Court today warned Bengal and Andhra Pradesh with &quot;consequences&quot; if they failed to respond to an eight-month-old directive relating to a law that has led to arrests over &quot;objectionable&quot; Internet posts.</p><p align="justify">On January 19, the court had asked all states and Union territories to respond to a central advisory that said no arrests should be made under Section 66A of the Information Technology Act without sanction from a senior officer of certain specified ranks.</p><p align="justify">&quot;If they (Bengal and Andhra) don't file it (replies), they will face the consequences. Anyway, we are giving them one more opportunity. Let them file their response within four weeks,&quot; the bench of Justices H.L. Gokhale and Dipak Misra said.</p><p align="justify">Many individuals have been arrested under 66A for Internet posts the authorities viewed as &quot;objectionable&quot;. Among them was Jadavpur University professor Ambikesh Mahapatra who was accused of circulating an Internet joke lampooning Bengal chief minister Mamata Banerjee.</p><p align="justify">This and a spate of other arrests under the clause had led to a public interest litigation challenging the constitutional validity of Section 66A on the ground that it infringed on individuals' fundamental rights. That case is now before a larger apex court bench.</p><p align="justify">On January 9, the Centre had issued the advisory saying no arrests should be made under the section without prior approval of an officer not below the rank of inspector-general in cities, or an officer not below the rank of deputy commissioner or superintendent in the districts.</p><p align="justify">Today, counsel for petitioner Shreya Singhal complained that Andhra and Bengal, both of which had a record of filing cases under the controversial section, were yet to send their responses.</p><p align="justify">In this context, the court reiterated its August 16 observation that individuals' right to free speech must be balanced with the state's power to restrict rumours that could create public disaffection.</p><p align="justify">At the last hearing, the court had cited the recent exodus, from many parts of the country, by people from the Northeast following rumours of impending attacks on them in the wake of certain incidents in Myanmar.</p><p align="justify">Singhal's PIL was filed last year after the arrest of two teenaged girls in Maharashtra for posting and &quot;liking&quot; on Facebook a remark questioning the shutdown on the day Shiv Sena leader Bal Thackeray was cremated.</p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 22574,
		'title' => '66A warning for Bengal',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Telegraph
</div>
<p align="justify">
<br />
<em>New Delhi: </em>The Supreme Court today warned Bengal and Andhra Pradesh with &quot;consequences&quot; if they failed to respond to an eight-month-old directive relating to a law that has led to arrests over &quot;objectionable&quot; Internet posts.
</p>
<p align="justify">
On January 19, the court had asked all states and Union territories to respond to a central advisory that said no arrests should be made under Section 66A of the Information Technology Act without sanction from a senior officer of certain specified ranks.
</p>
<p align="justify">
&quot;If they (Bengal and Andhra) don't file it (replies), they will face the consequences. Anyway, we are giving them one more opportunity. Let them file their response within four weeks,&quot; the bench of Justices H.L. Gokhale and Dipak Misra said.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Many individuals have been arrested under 66A for Internet posts the authorities viewed as &quot;objectionable&quot;. Among them was Jadavpur University professor Ambikesh Mahapatra who was accused of circulating an Internet joke lampooning Bengal chief minister Mamata Banerjee.
</p>
<p align="justify">
This and a spate of other arrests under the clause had led to a public interest litigation challenging the constitutional validity of Section 66A on the ground that it infringed on individuals' fundamental rights. That case is now before a larger apex court bench.
</p>
<p align="justify">
On January 9, the Centre had issued the advisory saying no arrests should be made under the section without prior approval of an officer not below the rank of inspector-general in cities, or an officer not below the rank of deputy commissioner or superintendent in the districts.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Today, counsel for petitioner Shreya Singhal complained that Andhra and Bengal, both of which had a record of filing cases under the controversial section, were yet to send their responses.
</p>
<p align="justify">
In this context, the court reiterated its August 16 observation that individuals' right to free speech must be balanced with the state's power to restrict rumours that could create public disaffection.
</p>
<p align="justify">
At the last hearing, the court had cited the recent exodus, from many parts of the country, by people from the Northeast following rumours of impending attacks on them in the wake of certain incidents in Myanmar.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Singhal's PIL was filed last year after the arrest of two teenaged girls in Maharashtra for posting and &quot;liking&quot; on Facebook a remark questioning the shutdown on the day Shiv Sena leader Bal Thackeray was cremated.
</p>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 21 September, 2013, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1130921/jsp/nation/story_17374546.jsp#.Uj1CLn_cjco',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => '66a-warning-for-bengal-22724',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 22724,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 22574,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 66A warning for Bengal',
	'metaKeywords' => 'social media,Freedom of Speech,internet,Law and Justice,Supreme Court',
	'metaDesc' => '
-The Telegraph



New Delhi: The Supreme Court today warned Bengal and Andhra Pradesh with &quot;consequences&quot; if they failed to respond to an eight-month-old directive relating to a law that has led to arrests over &quot;objectionable&quot; Internet posts.


On January 19, the court...',
	'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>The Supreme Court today warned Bengal and Andhra Pradesh with &quot;consequences&quot; if they failed to respond to an eight-month-old directive relating to a law that has led to arrests over &quot;objectionable&quot; Internet posts.</p><p align="justify">On January 19, the court had asked all states and Union territories to respond to a central advisory that said no arrests should be made under Section 66A of the Information Technology Act without sanction from a senior officer of certain specified ranks.</p><p align="justify">&quot;If they (Bengal and Andhra) don't file it (replies), they will face the consequences. Anyway, we are giving them one more opportunity. Let them file their response within four weeks,&quot; the bench of Justices H.L. Gokhale and Dipak Misra said.</p><p align="justify">Many individuals have been arrested under 66A for Internet posts the authorities viewed as &quot;objectionable&quot;. Among them was Jadavpur University professor Ambikesh Mahapatra who was accused of circulating an Internet joke lampooning Bengal chief minister Mamata Banerjee.</p><p align="justify">This and a spate of other arrests under the clause had led to a public interest litigation challenging the constitutional validity of Section 66A on the ground that it infringed on individuals' fundamental rights. That case is now before a larger apex court bench.</p><p align="justify">On January 9, the Centre had issued the advisory saying no arrests should be made under the section without prior approval of an officer not below the rank of inspector-general in cities, or an officer not below the rank of deputy commissioner or superintendent in the districts.</p><p align="justify">Today, counsel for petitioner Shreya Singhal complained that Andhra and Bengal, both of which had a record of filing cases under the controversial section, were yet to send their responses.</p><p align="justify">In this context, the court reiterated its August 16 observation that individuals' right to free speech must be balanced with the state's power to restrict rumours that could create public disaffection.</p><p align="justify">At the last hearing, the court had cited the recent exodus, from many parts of the country, by people from the Northeast following rumours of impending attacks on them in the wake of certain incidents in Myanmar.</p><p align="justify">Singhal's PIL was filed last year after the arrest of two teenaged girls in Maharashtra for posting and &quot;liking&quot; on Facebook a remark questioning the shutdown on the day Shiv Sena leader Bal Thackeray was cremated.</p>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 22574,
	'title' => '66A warning for Bengal',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Telegraph
</div>
<p align="justify">
<br />
<em>New Delhi: </em>The Supreme Court today warned Bengal and Andhra Pradesh with &quot;consequences&quot; if they failed to respond to an eight-month-old directive relating to a law that has led to arrests over &quot;objectionable&quot; Internet posts.
</p>
<p align="justify">
On January 19, the court had asked all states and Union territories to respond to a central advisory that said no arrests should be made under Section 66A of the Information Technology Act without sanction from a senior officer of certain specified ranks.
</p>
<p align="justify">
&quot;If they (Bengal and Andhra) don't file it (replies), they will face the consequences. Anyway, we are giving them one more opportunity. Let them file their response within four weeks,&quot; the bench of Justices H.L. Gokhale and Dipak Misra said.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Many individuals have been arrested under 66A for Internet posts the authorities viewed as &quot;objectionable&quot;. Among them was Jadavpur University professor Ambikesh Mahapatra who was accused of circulating an Internet joke lampooning Bengal chief minister Mamata Banerjee.
</p>
<p align="justify">
This and a spate of other arrests under the clause had led to a public interest litigation challenging the constitutional validity of Section 66A on the ground that it infringed on individuals' fundamental rights. That case is now before a larger apex court bench.
</p>
<p align="justify">
On January 9, the Centre had issued the advisory saying no arrests should be made under the section without prior approval of an officer not below the rank of inspector-general in cities, or an officer not below the rank of deputy commissioner or superintendent in the districts.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Today, counsel for petitioner Shreya Singhal complained that Andhra and Bengal, both of which had a record of filing cases under the controversial section, were yet to send their responses.
</p>
<p align="justify">
In this context, the court reiterated its August 16 observation that individuals' right to free speech must be balanced with the state's power to restrict rumours that could create public disaffection.
</p>
<p align="justify">
At the last hearing, the court had cited the recent exodus, from many parts of the country, by people from the Northeast following rumours of impending attacks on them in the wake of certain incidents in Myanmar.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Singhal's PIL was filed last year after the arrest of two teenaged girls in Maharashtra for posting and &quot;liking&quot; on Facebook a remark questioning the shutdown on the day Shiv Sena leader Bal Thackeray was cremated.
</p>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 21 September, 2013, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1130921/jsp/nation/story_17374546.jsp#.Uj1CLn_cjco',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => '66a-warning-for-bengal-22724',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 22724,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 22574
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | 66A warning for Bengal'
$metaKeywords = 'social media,Freedom of Speech,internet,Law and Justice,Supreme Court'
$metaDesc = '
-The Telegraph



New Delhi: The Supreme Court today warned Bengal and Andhra Pradesh with &quot;consequences&quot; if they failed to respond to an eight-month-old directive relating to a law that has led to arrests over &quot;objectionable&quot; Internet posts.


On January 19, the court...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>The Supreme Court today warned Bengal and Andhra Pradesh with &quot;consequences&quot; if they failed to respond to an eight-month-old directive relating to a law that has led to arrests over &quot;objectionable&quot; Internet posts.</p><p align="justify">On January 19, the court had asked all states and Union territories to respond to a central advisory that said no arrests should be made under Section 66A of the Information Technology Act without sanction from a senior officer of certain specified ranks.</p><p align="justify">&quot;If they (Bengal and Andhra) don't file it (replies), they will face the consequences. Anyway, we are giving them one more opportunity. Let them file their response within four weeks,&quot; the bench of Justices H.L. Gokhale and Dipak Misra said.</p><p align="justify">Many individuals have been arrested under 66A for Internet posts the authorities viewed as &quot;objectionable&quot;. Among them was Jadavpur University professor Ambikesh Mahapatra who was accused of circulating an Internet joke lampooning Bengal chief minister Mamata Banerjee.</p><p align="justify">This and a spate of other arrests under the clause had led to a public interest litigation challenging the constitutional validity of Section 66A on the ground that it infringed on individuals' fundamental rights. That case is now before a larger apex court bench.</p><p align="justify">On January 9, the Centre had issued the advisory saying no arrests should be made under the section without prior approval of an officer not below the rank of inspector-general in cities, or an officer not below the rank of deputy commissioner or superintendent in the districts.</p><p align="justify">Today, counsel for petitioner Shreya Singhal complained that Andhra and Bengal, both of which had a record of filing cases under the controversial section, were yet to send their responses.</p><p align="justify">In this context, the court reiterated its August 16 observation that individuals' right to free speech must be balanced with the state's power to restrict rumours that could create public disaffection.</p><p align="justify">At the last hearing, the court had cited the recent exodus, from many parts of the country, by people from the Northeast following rumours of impending attacks on them in the wake of certain incidents in Myanmar.</p><p align="justify">Singhal's PIL was filed last year after the arrest of two teenaged girls in Maharashtra for posting and &quot;liking&quot; on Facebook a remark questioning the shutdown on the day Shiv Sena leader Bal Thackeray was cremated.</p>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

66A warning for Bengal

-The Telegraph New Delhi: The Supreme Court today warned Bengal and Andhra Pradesh with "consequences" if they failed to respond to an eight-month-old directive relating to a law that has led to arrests over "objectionable" Internet posts. On January 19, the court had asked all states and Union territories to respond to a central advisory that said no arrests should be made under Section 66A of the Information Technology Act without sanction from a senior officer of certain specified ranks. "If they (Bengal and Andhra) don't file it (replies), they will face the consequences. Anyway, we are giving them one more opportunity. Let them file their response within four weeks," the bench of Justices H.L. Gokhale and Dipak Misra said. Many individuals have been arrested under 66A for Internet posts the authorities viewed as "objectionable". Among them was Jadavpur University professor Ambikesh Mahapatra who was accused of circulating an Internet joke lampooning Bengal chief minister Mamata Banerjee. This and a spate of other arrests under the clause had led to a public interest litigation challenging the constitutional validity of Section 66A on the ground that it infringed on individuals' fundamental rights. That case is now before a larger apex court bench. On January 9, the Centre had issued the advisory saying no arrests should be made under the section without prior approval of an officer not below the rank of inspector-general in cities, or an officer not below the rank of deputy commissioner or superintendent in the districts. Today, counsel for petitioner Shreya Singhal complained that Andhra and Bengal, both of which had a record of filing cases under the controversial section, were yet to send their responses. In this context, the court reiterated its August 16 observation that individuals' right to free speech must be balanced with the state's power to restrict rumours that could create public disaffection. At the last hearing, the court had cited the recent exodus, from many parts of the country, by people from the Northeast following rumours of impending attacks on them in the wake of certain incidents in Myanmar. Singhal's PIL was filed last year after the arrest of two teenaged girls in Maharashtra for posting and "liking" on Facebook a remark questioning the shutdown on the day Shiv Sena leader Bal Thackeray was cremated.