Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/a-big-loss-10370/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/a-big-loss-10370/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/a-big-loss-10370/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/a-big-loss-10370/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681f3af03a5db-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681f3af03a5db-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr681f3af03a5db-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681f3af03a5db-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681f3af03a5db-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681f3af03a5db-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681f3af03a5db-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr681f3af03a5db-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr681f3af03a5db-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10259, 'title' => 'A big loss', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p> -The Indian Express </p> <p> &nbsp; </p> <div align="justify"> The Comptroller and Auditor General of India is being increasingly questioned, as reports emerge about the divisions within the agency on calculating the loss to the public exchequer from the 2G licencing process. The CAG shot for drama in its high-profile press conferences, in which eye-catching numbers were trumpeted that became firmly ensconced in our collective memory. The 2G report was brandished triumphantly, like a World Cup trophy, in what appeared less an exercise in informing the public and Parliament than in a submission to prime-time sensationalism. The estimate of the presumptive loss to the treasury from the licencing process was questioned almost immediately; naturally, given that the figure insisted on, Rs 1.76 lakh crore, was so enormous, so outlandish.<br /> <br /> It seems, now, that the CAG&rsquo;s hubris was even greater than previously suspected. So intent were the agency&rsquo;s leaders on the higher figure that lower estimates from those closer to the subject were ignored; and, as this newspaper reported on Saturday, the lead auditor was discouraged by the agency&rsquo;s head, Vinod Rai, from asking for the response of the department of telecommunications to the CAG&rsquo;s suppositions. The refusal to allow the DoT to explain itself violates simple principles of justice and our sense of due process. The auditor in question, R.P. Singh, was supposedly the one conducting the 2G audit, and he had estimated the losses Rs 2,645 crore &mdash; a number substantially different than the final report&rsquo;s Rs 1.76 lakh crore. That was tacked together using various different methods &mdash; most remarkably, by directly comparing values from the 3G auction last year to the 2G licencing process half a decade earlier.<br /> <br /> Earlier this year, the prime minister pointed out that, if auctions have not taken place, calculating any loss is deeply problematic: &ldquo;There are various estimates, but you have to assess what is the right magnitude after asking yourself what was the right price.&rdquo; When the losses you are trying to calculate are presumptive, your assumptions matter. And, thanks partly to the Right to Information Act, which was designed precisely to uncover such establishmentarian excess and subterfuge, it seems clear now that the CAG wanted to jerry-rig the assumptions to give us the largest, most staggering figure for the loss possible, like a big-talking hunter would exaggerate the size of the tiger he shot. This is worryingly irresponsible. The CAG has an important role to play in helping Parliament oversee the executive&rsquo;s expenditure; it seems a pity that it is bent on undermining its own credibility. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 3 October, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/a-big-loss/854675/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'a-big-loss-10370', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10370, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 10259, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | A big loss', 'metaKeywords' => 'Comptroller and Auditor-General,CAG,Corruption', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Indian Express &nbsp; The Comptroller and Auditor General of India is being increasingly questioned, as reports emerge about the divisions within the agency on calculating the loss to the public exchequer from the 2G licencing process. The CAG shot for drama...', 'disp' => '<p>-The Indian Express</p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">The Comptroller and Auditor General of India is being increasingly questioned, as reports emerge about the divisions within the agency on calculating the loss to the public exchequer from the 2G licencing process. The CAG shot for drama in its high-profile press conferences, in which eye-catching numbers were trumpeted that became firmly ensconced in our collective memory. The 2G report was brandished triumphantly, like a World Cup trophy, in what appeared less an exercise in informing the public and Parliament than in a submission to prime-time sensationalism. The estimate of the presumptive loss to the treasury from the licencing process was questioned almost immediately; naturally, given that the figure insisted on, Rs 1.76 lakh crore, was so enormous, so outlandish.<br /><br />It seems, now, that the CAG&rsquo;s hubris was even greater than previously suspected. So intent were the agency&rsquo;s leaders on the higher figure that lower estimates from those closer to the subject were ignored; and, as this newspaper reported on Saturday, the lead auditor was discouraged by the agency&rsquo;s head, Vinod Rai, from asking for the response of the department of telecommunications to the CAG&rsquo;s suppositions. The refusal to allow the DoT to explain itself violates simple principles of justice and our sense of due process. The auditor in question, R.P. Singh, was supposedly the one conducting the 2G audit, and he had estimated the losses Rs 2,645 crore &mdash; a number substantially different than the final report&rsquo;s Rs 1.76 lakh crore. That was tacked together using various different methods &mdash; most remarkably, by directly comparing values from the 3G auction last year to the 2G licencing process half a decade earlier.<br /><br />Earlier this year, the prime minister pointed out that, if auctions have not taken place, calculating any loss is deeply problematic: &ldquo;There are various estimates, but you have to assess what is the right magnitude after asking yourself what was the right price.&rdquo; When the losses you are trying to calculate are presumptive, your assumptions matter. And, thanks partly to the Right to Information Act, which was designed precisely to uncover such establishmentarian excess and subterfuge, it seems clear now that the CAG wanted to jerry-rig the assumptions to give us the largest, most staggering figure for the loss possible, like a big-talking hunter would exaggerate the size of the tiger he shot. This is worryingly irresponsible. The CAG has an important role to play in helping Parliament oversee the executive&rsquo;s expenditure; it seems a pity that it is bent on undermining its own credibility.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10259, 'title' => 'A big loss', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p> -The Indian Express </p> <p> &nbsp; </p> <div align="justify"> The Comptroller and Auditor General of India is being increasingly questioned, as reports emerge about the divisions within the agency on calculating the loss to the public exchequer from the 2G licencing process. The CAG shot for drama in its high-profile press conferences, in which eye-catching numbers were trumpeted that became firmly ensconced in our collective memory. The 2G report was brandished triumphantly, like a World Cup trophy, in what appeared less an exercise in informing the public and Parliament than in a submission to prime-time sensationalism. The estimate of the presumptive loss to the treasury from the licencing process was questioned almost immediately; naturally, given that the figure insisted on, Rs 1.76 lakh crore, was so enormous, so outlandish.<br /> <br /> It seems, now, that the CAG&rsquo;s hubris was even greater than previously suspected. So intent were the agency&rsquo;s leaders on the higher figure that lower estimates from those closer to the subject were ignored; and, as this newspaper reported on Saturday, the lead auditor was discouraged by the agency&rsquo;s head, Vinod Rai, from asking for the response of the department of telecommunications to the CAG&rsquo;s suppositions. The refusal to allow the DoT to explain itself violates simple principles of justice and our sense of due process. The auditor in question, R.P. Singh, was supposedly the one conducting the 2G audit, and he had estimated the losses Rs 2,645 crore &mdash; a number substantially different than the final report&rsquo;s Rs 1.76 lakh crore. That was tacked together using various different methods &mdash; most remarkably, by directly comparing values from the 3G auction last year to the 2G licencing process half a decade earlier.<br /> <br /> Earlier this year, the prime minister pointed out that, if auctions have not taken place, calculating any loss is deeply problematic: &ldquo;There are various estimates, but you have to assess what is the right magnitude after asking yourself what was the right price.&rdquo; When the losses you are trying to calculate are presumptive, your assumptions matter. And, thanks partly to the Right to Information Act, which was designed precisely to uncover such establishmentarian excess and subterfuge, it seems clear now that the CAG wanted to jerry-rig the assumptions to give us the largest, most staggering figure for the loss possible, like a big-talking hunter would exaggerate the size of the tiger he shot. This is worryingly irresponsible. The CAG has an important role to play in helping Parliament oversee the executive&rsquo;s expenditure; it seems a pity that it is bent on undermining its own credibility. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 3 October, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/a-big-loss/854675/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'a-big-loss-10370', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10370, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 10259 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | A big loss' $metaKeywords = 'Comptroller and Auditor-General,CAG,Corruption' $metaDesc = ' -The Indian Express &nbsp; The Comptroller and Auditor General of India is being increasingly questioned, as reports emerge about the divisions within the agency on calculating the loss to the public exchequer from the 2G licencing process. The CAG shot for drama...' $disp = '<p>-The Indian Express</p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">The Comptroller and Auditor General of India is being increasingly questioned, as reports emerge about the divisions within the agency on calculating the loss to the public exchequer from the 2G licencing process. The CAG shot for drama in its high-profile press conferences, in which eye-catching numbers were trumpeted that became firmly ensconced in our collective memory. The 2G report was brandished triumphantly, like a World Cup trophy, in what appeared less an exercise in informing the public and Parliament than in a submission to prime-time sensationalism. The estimate of the presumptive loss to the treasury from the licencing process was questioned almost immediately; naturally, given that the figure insisted on, Rs 1.76 lakh crore, was so enormous, so outlandish.<br /><br />It seems, now, that the CAG&rsquo;s hubris was even greater than previously suspected. So intent were the agency&rsquo;s leaders on the higher figure that lower estimates from those closer to the subject were ignored; and, as this newspaper reported on Saturday, the lead auditor was discouraged by the agency&rsquo;s head, Vinod Rai, from asking for the response of the department of telecommunications to the CAG&rsquo;s suppositions. The refusal to allow the DoT to explain itself violates simple principles of justice and our sense of due process. The auditor in question, R.P. Singh, was supposedly the one conducting the 2G audit, and he had estimated the losses Rs 2,645 crore &mdash; a number substantially different than the final report&rsquo;s Rs 1.76 lakh crore. That was tacked together using various different methods &mdash; most remarkably, by directly comparing values from the 3G auction last year to the 2G licencing process half a decade earlier.<br /><br />Earlier this year, the prime minister pointed out that, if auctions have not taken place, calculating any loss is deeply problematic: &ldquo;There are various estimates, but you have to assess what is the right magnitude after asking yourself what was the right price.&rdquo; When the losses you are trying to calculate are presumptive, your assumptions matter. And, thanks partly to the Right to Information Act, which was designed precisely to uncover such establishmentarian excess and subterfuge, it seems clear now that the CAG wanted to jerry-rig the assumptions to give us the largest, most staggering figure for the loss possible, like a big-talking hunter would exaggerate the size of the tiger he shot. This is worryingly irresponsible. The CAG has an important role to play in helping Parliament oversee the executive&rsquo;s expenditure; it seems a pity that it is bent on undermining its own credibility.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/a-big-loss-10370.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | A big loss | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Indian Express The Comptroller and Auditor General of India is being increasingly questioned, as reports emerge about the divisions within the agency on calculating the loss to the public exchequer from the 2G licencing process. The CAG shot for drama..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>A big loss</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p>-The Indian Express</p><p> </p><div align="justify">The Comptroller and Auditor General of India is being increasingly questioned, as reports emerge about the divisions within the agency on calculating the loss to the public exchequer from the 2G licencing process. The CAG shot for drama in its high-profile press conferences, in which eye-catching numbers were trumpeted that became firmly ensconced in our collective memory. The 2G report was brandished triumphantly, like a World Cup trophy, in what appeared less an exercise in informing the public and Parliament than in a submission to prime-time sensationalism. The estimate of the presumptive loss to the treasury from the licencing process was questioned almost immediately; naturally, given that the figure insisted on, Rs 1.76 lakh crore, was so enormous, so outlandish.<br /><br />It seems, now, that the CAG’s hubris was even greater than previously suspected. So intent were the agency’s leaders on the higher figure that lower estimates from those closer to the subject were ignored; and, as this newspaper reported on Saturday, the lead auditor was discouraged by the agency’s head, Vinod Rai, from asking for the response of the department of telecommunications to the CAG’s suppositions. The refusal to allow the DoT to explain itself violates simple principles of justice and our sense of due process. The auditor in question, R.P. Singh, was supposedly the one conducting the 2G audit, and he had estimated the losses Rs 2,645 crore — a number substantially different than the final report’s Rs 1.76 lakh crore. That was tacked together using various different methods — most remarkably, by directly comparing values from the 3G auction last year to the 2G licencing process half a decade earlier.<br /><br />Earlier this year, the prime minister pointed out that, if auctions have not taken place, calculating any loss is deeply problematic: “There are various estimates, but you have to assess what is the right magnitude after asking yourself what was the right price.” When the losses you are trying to calculate are presumptive, your assumptions matter. And, thanks partly to the Right to Information Act, which was designed precisely to uncover such establishmentarian excess and subterfuge, it seems clear now that the CAG wanted to jerry-rig the assumptions to give us the largest, most staggering figure for the loss possible, like a big-talking hunter would exaggerate the size of the tiger he shot. This is worryingly irresponsible. The CAG has an important role to play in helping Parliament oversee the executive’s expenditure; it seems a pity that it is bent on undermining its own credibility.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681f3af03a5db-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681f3af03a5db-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr681f3af03a5db-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681f3af03a5db-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681f3af03a5db-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681f3af03a5db-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681f3af03a5db-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr681f3af03a5db-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr681f3af03a5db-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10259, 'title' => 'A big loss', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p> -The Indian Express </p> <p> &nbsp; </p> <div align="justify"> The Comptroller and Auditor General of India is being increasingly questioned, as reports emerge about the divisions within the agency on calculating the loss to the public exchequer from the 2G licencing process. The CAG shot for drama in its high-profile press conferences, in which eye-catching numbers were trumpeted that became firmly ensconced in our collective memory. The 2G report was brandished triumphantly, like a World Cup trophy, in what appeared less an exercise in informing the public and Parliament than in a submission to prime-time sensationalism. The estimate of the presumptive loss to the treasury from the licencing process was questioned almost immediately; naturally, given that the figure insisted on, Rs 1.76 lakh crore, was so enormous, so outlandish.<br /> <br /> It seems, now, that the CAG&rsquo;s hubris was even greater than previously suspected. So intent were the agency&rsquo;s leaders on the higher figure that lower estimates from those closer to the subject were ignored; and, as this newspaper reported on Saturday, the lead auditor was discouraged by the agency&rsquo;s head, Vinod Rai, from asking for the response of the department of telecommunications to the CAG&rsquo;s suppositions. The refusal to allow the DoT to explain itself violates simple principles of justice and our sense of due process. The auditor in question, R.P. Singh, was supposedly the one conducting the 2G audit, and he had estimated the losses Rs 2,645 crore &mdash; a number substantially different than the final report&rsquo;s Rs 1.76 lakh crore. That was tacked together using various different methods &mdash; most remarkably, by directly comparing values from the 3G auction last year to the 2G licencing process half a decade earlier.<br /> <br /> Earlier this year, the prime minister pointed out that, if auctions have not taken place, calculating any loss is deeply problematic: &ldquo;There are various estimates, but you have to assess what is the right magnitude after asking yourself what was the right price.&rdquo; When the losses you are trying to calculate are presumptive, your assumptions matter. And, thanks partly to the Right to Information Act, which was designed precisely to uncover such establishmentarian excess and subterfuge, it seems clear now that the CAG wanted to jerry-rig the assumptions to give us the largest, most staggering figure for the loss possible, like a big-talking hunter would exaggerate the size of the tiger he shot. This is worryingly irresponsible. The CAG has an important role to play in helping Parliament oversee the executive&rsquo;s expenditure; it seems a pity that it is bent on undermining its own credibility. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 3 October, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/a-big-loss/854675/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'a-big-loss-10370', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10370, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 10259, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | A big loss', 'metaKeywords' => 'Comptroller and Auditor-General,CAG,Corruption', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Indian Express &nbsp; The Comptroller and Auditor General of India is being increasingly questioned, as reports emerge about the divisions within the agency on calculating the loss to the public exchequer from the 2G licencing process. The CAG shot for drama...', 'disp' => '<p>-The Indian Express</p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">The Comptroller and Auditor General of India is being increasingly questioned, as reports emerge about the divisions within the agency on calculating the loss to the public exchequer from the 2G licencing process. The CAG shot for drama in its high-profile press conferences, in which eye-catching numbers were trumpeted that became firmly ensconced in our collective memory. The 2G report was brandished triumphantly, like a World Cup trophy, in what appeared less an exercise in informing the public and Parliament than in a submission to prime-time sensationalism. The estimate of the presumptive loss to the treasury from the licencing process was questioned almost immediately; naturally, given that the figure insisted on, Rs 1.76 lakh crore, was so enormous, so outlandish.<br /><br />It seems, now, that the CAG&rsquo;s hubris was even greater than previously suspected. So intent were the agency&rsquo;s leaders on the higher figure that lower estimates from those closer to the subject were ignored; and, as this newspaper reported on Saturday, the lead auditor was discouraged by the agency&rsquo;s head, Vinod Rai, from asking for the response of the department of telecommunications to the CAG&rsquo;s suppositions. The refusal to allow the DoT to explain itself violates simple principles of justice and our sense of due process. The auditor in question, R.P. Singh, was supposedly the one conducting the 2G audit, and he had estimated the losses Rs 2,645 crore &mdash; a number substantially different than the final report&rsquo;s Rs 1.76 lakh crore. That was tacked together using various different methods &mdash; most remarkably, by directly comparing values from the 3G auction last year to the 2G licencing process half a decade earlier.<br /><br />Earlier this year, the prime minister pointed out that, if auctions have not taken place, calculating any loss is deeply problematic: &ldquo;There are various estimates, but you have to assess what is the right magnitude after asking yourself what was the right price.&rdquo; When the losses you are trying to calculate are presumptive, your assumptions matter. And, thanks partly to the Right to Information Act, which was designed precisely to uncover such establishmentarian excess and subterfuge, it seems clear now that the CAG wanted to jerry-rig the assumptions to give us the largest, most staggering figure for the loss possible, like a big-talking hunter would exaggerate the size of the tiger he shot. This is worryingly irresponsible. The CAG has an important role to play in helping Parliament oversee the executive&rsquo;s expenditure; it seems a pity that it is bent on undermining its own credibility.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10259, 'title' => 'A big loss', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p> -The Indian Express </p> <p> &nbsp; </p> <div align="justify"> The Comptroller and Auditor General of India is being increasingly questioned, as reports emerge about the divisions within the agency on calculating the loss to the public exchequer from the 2G licencing process. The CAG shot for drama in its high-profile press conferences, in which eye-catching numbers were trumpeted that became firmly ensconced in our collective memory. The 2G report was brandished triumphantly, like a World Cup trophy, in what appeared less an exercise in informing the public and Parliament than in a submission to prime-time sensationalism. The estimate of the presumptive loss to the treasury from the licencing process was questioned almost immediately; naturally, given that the figure insisted on, Rs 1.76 lakh crore, was so enormous, so outlandish.<br /> <br /> It seems, now, that the CAG&rsquo;s hubris was even greater than previously suspected. So intent were the agency&rsquo;s leaders on the higher figure that lower estimates from those closer to the subject were ignored; and, as this newspaper reported on Saturday, the lead auditor was discouraged by the agency&rsquo;s head, Vinod Rai, from asking for the response of the department of telecommunications to the CAG&rsquo;s suppositions. The refusal to allow the DoT to explain itself violates simple principles of justice and our sense of due process. The auditor in question, R.P. Singh, was supposedly the one conducting the 2G audit, and he had estimated the losses Rs 2,645 crore &mdash; a number substantially different than the final report&rsquo;s Rs 1.76 lakh crore. That was tacked together using various different methods &mdash; most remarkably, by directly comparing values from the 3G auction last year to the 2G licencing process half a decade earlier.<br /> <br /> Earlier this year, the prime minister pointed out that, if auctions have not taken place, calculating any loss is deeply problematic: &ldquo;There are various estimates, but you have to assess what is the right magnitude after asking yourself what was the right price.&rdquo; When the losses you are trying to calculate are presumptive, your assumptions matter. And, thanks partly to the Right to Information Act, which was designed precisely to uncover such establishmentarian excess and subterfuge, it seems clear now that the CAG wanted to jerry-rig the assumptions to give us the largest, most staggering figure for the loss possible, like a big-talking hunter would exaggerate the size of the tiger he shot. This is worryingly irresponsible. The CAG has an important role to play in helping Parliament oversee the executive&rsquo;s expenditure; it seems a pity that it is bent on undermining its own credibility. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 3 October, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/a-big-loss/854675/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'a-big-loss-10370', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10370, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 10259 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | A big loss' $metaKeywords = 'Comptroller and Auditor-General,CAG,Corruption' $metaDesc = ' -The Indian Express &nbsp; The Comptroller and Auditor General of India is being increasingly questioned, as reports emerge about the divisions within the agency on calculating the loss to the public exchequer from the 2G licencing process. The CAG shot for drama...' $disp = '<p>-The Indian Express</p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">The Comptroller and Auditor General of India is being increasingly questioned, as reports emerge about the divisions within the agency on calculating the loss to the public exchequer from the 2G licencing process. The CAG shot for drama in its high-profile press conferences, in which eye-catching numbers were trumpeted that became firmly ensconced in our collective memory. The 2G report was brandished triumphantly, like a World Cup trophy, in what appeared less an exercise in informing the public and Parliament than in a submission to prime-time sensationalism. The estimate of the presumptive loss to the treasury from the licencing process was questioned almost immediately; naturally, given that the figure insisted on, Rs 1.76 lakh crore, was so enormous, so outlandish.<br /><br />It seems, now, that the CAG&rsquo;s hubris was even greater than previously suspected. So intent were the agency&rsquo;s leaders on the higher figure that lower estimates from those closer to the subject were ignored; and, as this newspaper reported on Saturday, the lead auditor was discouraged by the agency&rsquo;s head, Vinod Rai, from asking for the response of the department of telecommunications to the CAG&rsquo;s suppositions. The refusal to allow the DoT to explain itself violates simple principles of justice and our sense of due process. The auditor in question, R.P. Singh, was supposedly the one conducting the 2G audit, and he had estimated the losses Rs 2,645 crore &mdash; a number substantially different than the final report&rsquo;s Rs 1.76 lakh crore. That was tacked together using various different methods &mdash; most remarkably, by directly comparing values from the 3G auction last year to the 2G licencing process half a decade earlier.<br /><br />Earlier this year, the prime minister pointed out that, if auctions have not taken place, calculating any loss is deeply problematic: &ldquo;There are various estimates, but you have to assess what is the right magnitude after asking yourself what was the right price.&rdquo; When the losses you are trying to calculate are presumptive, your assumptions matter. And, thanks partly to the Right to Information Act, which was designed precisely to uncover such establishmentarian excess and subterfuge, it seems clear now that the CAG wanted to jerry-rig the assumptions to give us the largest, most staggering figure for the loss possible, like a big-talking hunter would exaggerate the size of the tiger he shot. This is worryingly irresponsible. The CAG has an important role to play in helping Parliament oversee the executive&rsquo;s expenditure; it seems a pity that it is bent on undermining its own credibility.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/a-big-loss-10370.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | A big loss | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Indian Express The Comptroller and Auditor General of India is being increasingly questioned, as reports emerge about the divisions within the agency on calculating the loss to the public exchequer from the 2G licencing process. The CAG shot for drama..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>A big loss</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p>-The Indian Express</p><p> </p><div align="justify">The Comptroller and Auditor General of India is being increasingly questioned, as reports emerge about the divisions within the agency on calculating the loss to the public exchequer from the 2G licencing process. The CAG shot for drama in its high-profile press conferences, in which eye-catching numbers were trumpeted that became firmly ensconced in our collective memory. The 2G report was brandished triumphantly, like a World Cup trophy, in what appeared less an exercise in informing the public and Parliament than in a submission to prime-time sensationalism. The estimate of the presumptive loss to the treasury from the licencing process was questioned almost immediately; naturally, given that the figure insisted on, Rs 1.76 lakh crore, was so enormous, so outlandish.<br /><br />It seems, now, that the CAG’s hubris was even greater than previously suspected. So intent were the agency’s leaders on the higher figure that lower estimates from those closer to the subject were ignored; and, as this newspaper reported on Saturday, the lead auditor was discouraged by the agency’s head, Vinod Rai, from asking for the response of the department of telecommunications to the CAG’s suppositions. The refusal to allow the DoT to explain itself violates simple principles of justice and our sense of due process. The auditor in question, R.P. Singh, was supposedly the one conducting the 2G audit, and he had estimated the losses Rs 2,645 crore — a number substantially different than the final report’s Rs 1.76 lakh crore. That was tacked together using various different methods — most remarkably, by directly comparing values from the 3G auction last year to the 2G licencing process half a decade earlier.<br /><br />Earlier this year, the prime minister pointed out that, if auctions have not taken place, calculating any loss is deeply problematic: “There are various estimates, but you have to assess what is the right magnitude after asking yourself what was the right price.” When the losses you are trying to calculate are presumptive, your assumptions matter. And, thanks partly to the Right to Information Act, which was designed precisely to uncover such establishmentarian excess and subterfuge, it seems clear now that the CAG wanted to jerry-rig the assumptions to give us the largest, most staggering figure for the loss possible, like a big-talking hunter would exaggerate the size of the tiger he shot. This is worryingly irresponsible. The CAG has an important role to play in helping Parliament oversee the executive’s expenditure; it seems a pity that it is bent on undermining its own credibility.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681f3af03a5db-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681f3af03a5db-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr681f3af03a5db-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681f3af03a5db-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681f3af03a5db-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681f3af03a5db-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681f3af03a5db-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr681f3af03a5db-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr681f3af03a5db-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10259, 'title' => 'A big loss', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p> -The Indian Express </p> <p> &nbsp; </p> <div align="justify"> The Comptroller and Auditor General of India is being increasingly questioned, as reports emerge about the divisions within the agency on calculating the loss to the public exchequer from the 2G licencing process. The CAG shot for drama in its high-profile press conferences, in which eye-catching numbers were trumpeted that became firmly ensconced in our collective memory. The 2G report was brandished triumphantly, like a World Cup trophy, in what appeared less an exercise in informing the public and Parliament than in a submission to prime-time sensationalism. The estimate of the presumptive loss to the treasury from the licencing process was questioned almost immediately; naturally, given that the figure insisted on, Rs 1.76 lakh crore, was so enormous, so outlandish.<br /> <br /> It seems, now, that the CAG&rsquo;s hubris was even greater than previously suspected. So intent were the agency&rsquo;s leaders on the higher figure that lower estimates from those closer to the subject were ignored; and, as this newspaper reported on Saturday, the lead auditor was discouraged by the agency&rsquo;s head, Vinod Rai, from asking for the response of the department of telecommunications to the CAG&rsquo;s suppositions. The refusal to allow the DoT to explain itself violates simple principles of justice and our sense of due process. The auditor in question, R.P. Singh, was supposedly the one conducting the 2G audit, and he had estimated the losses Rs 2,645 crore &mdash; a number substantially different than the final report&rsquo;s Rs 1.76 lakh crore. That was tacked together using various different methods &mdash; most remarkably, by directly comparing values from the 3G auction last year to the 2G licencing process half a decade earlier.<br /> <br /> Earlier this year, the prime minister pointed out that, if auctions have not taken place, calculating any loss is deeply problematic: &ldquo;There are various estimates, but you have to assess what is the right magnitude after asking yourself what was the right price.&rdquo; When the losses you are trying to calculate are presumptive, your assumptions matter. And, thanks partly to the Right to Information Act, which was designed precisely to uncover such establishmentarian excess and subterfuge, it seems clear now that the CAG wanted to jerry-rig the assumptions to give us the largest, most staggering figure for the loss possible, like a big-talking hunter would exaggerate the size of the tiger he shot. This is worryingly irresponsible. The CAG has an important role to play in helping Parliament oversee the executive&rsquo;s expenditure; it seems a pity that it is bent on undermining its own credibility. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 3 October, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/a-big-loss/854675/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'a-big-loss-10370', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10370, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 10259, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | A big loss', 'metaKeywords' => 'Comptroller and Auditor-General,CAG,Corruption', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Indian Express &nbsp; The Comptroller and Auditor General of India is being increasingly questioned, as reports emerge about the divisions within the agency on calculating the loss to the public exchequer from the 2G licencing process. The CAG shot for drama...', 'disp' => '<p>-The Indian Express</p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">The Comptroller and Auditor General of India is being increasingly questioned, as reports emerge about the divisions within the agency on calculating the loss to the public exchequer from the 2G licencing process. The CAG shot for drama in its high-profile press conferences, in which eye-catching numbers were trumpeted that became firmly ensconced in our collective memory. The 2G report was brandished triumphantly, like a World Cup trophy, in what appeared less an exercise in informing the public and Parliament than in a submission to prime-time sensationalism. The estimate of the presumptive loss to the treasury from the licencing process was questioned almost immediately; naturally, given that the figure insisted on, Rs 1.76 lakh crore, was so enormous, so outlandish.<br /><br />It seems, now, that the CAG&rsquo;s hubris was even greater than previously suspected. So intent were the agency&rsquo;s leaders on the higher figure that lower estimates from those closer to the subject were ignored; and, as this newspaper reported on Saturday, the lead auditor was discouraged by the agency&rsquo;s head, Vinod Rai, from asking for the response of the department of telecommunications to the CAG&rsquo;s suppositions. The refusal to allow the DoT to explain itself violates simple principles of justice and our sense of due process. The auditor in question, R.P. Singh, was supposedly the one conducting the 2G audit, and he had estimated the losses Rs 2,645 crore &mdash; a number substantially different than the final report&rsquo;s Rs 1.76 lakh crore. That was tacked together using various different methods &mdash; most remarkably, by directly comparing values from the 3G auction last year to the 2G licencing process half a decade earlier.<br /><br />Earlier this year, the prime minister pointed out that, if auctions have not taken place, calculating any loss is deeply problematic: &ldquo;There are various estimates, but you have to assess what is the right magnitude after asking yourself what was the right price.&rdquo; When the losses you are trying to calculate are presumptive, your assumptions matter. And, thanks partly to the Right to Information Act, which was designed precisely to uncover such establishmentarian excess and subterfuge, it seems clear now that the CAG wanted to jerry-rig the assumptions to give us the largest, most staggering figure for the loss possible, like a big-talking hunter would exaggerate the size of the tiger he shot. This is worryingly irresponsible. The CAG has an important role to play in helping Parliament oversee the executive&rsquo;s expenditure; it seems a pity that it is bent on undermining its own credibility.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10259, 'title' => 'A big loss', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p> -The Indian Express </p> <p> &nbsp; </p> <div align="justify"> The Comptroller and Auditor General of India is being increasingly questioned, as reports emerge about the divisions within the agency on calculating the loss to the public exchequer from the 2G licencing process. The CAG shot for drama in its high-profile press conferences, in which eye-catching numbers were trumpeted that became firmly ensconced in our collective memory. The 2G report was brandished triumphantly, like a World Cup trophy, in what appeared less an exercise in informing the public and Parliament than in a submission to prime-time sensationalism. The estimate of the presumptive loss to the treasury from the licencing process was questioned almost immediately; naturally, given that the figure insisted on, Rs 1.76 lakh crore, was so enormous, so outlandish.<br /> <br /> It seems, now, that the CAG&rsquo;s hubris was even greater than previously suspected. So intent were the agency&rsquo;s leaders on the higher figure that lower estimates from those closer to the subject were ignored; and, as this newspaper reported on Saturday, the lead auditor was discouraged by the agency&rsquo;s head, Vinod Rai, from asking for the response of the department of telecommunications to the CAG&rsquo;s suppositions. The refusal to allow the DoT to explain itself violates simple principles of justice and our sense of due process. The auditor in question, R.P. Singh, was supposedly the one conducting the 2G audit, and he had estimated the losses Rs 2,645 crore &mdash; a number substantially different than the final report&rsquo;s Rs 1.76 lakh crore. That was tacked together using various different methods &mdash; most remarkably, by directly comparing values from the 3G auction last year to the 2G licencing process half a decade earlier.<br /> <br /> Earlier this year, the prime minister pointed out that, if auctions have not taken place, calculating any loss is deeply problematic: &ldquo;There are various estimates, but you have to assess what is the right magnitude after asking yourself what was the right price.&rdquo; When the losses you are trying to calculate are presumptive, your assumptions matter. And, thanks partly to the Right to Information Act, which was designed precisely to uncover such establishmentarian excess and subterfuge, it seems clear now that the CAG wanted to jerry-rig the assumptions to give us the largest, most staggering figure for the loss possible, like a big-talking hunter would exaggerate the size of the tiger he shot. This is worryingly irresponsible. The CAG has an important role to play in helping Parliament oversee the executive&rsquo;s expenditure; it seems a pity that it is bent on undermining its own credibility. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 3 October, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/a-big-loss/854675/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'a-big-loss-10370', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10370, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 10259 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | A big loss' $metaKeywords = 'Comptroller and Auditor-General,CAG,Corruption' $metaDesc = ' -The Indian Express &nbsp; The Comptroller and Auditor General of India is being increasingly questioned, as reports emerge about the divisions within the agency on calculating the loss to the public exchequer from the 2G licencing process. The CAG shot for drama...' $disp = '<p>-The Indian Express</p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">The Comptroller and Auditor General of India is being increasingly questioned, as reports emerge about the divisions within the agency on calculating the loss to the public exchequer from the 2G licencing process. The CAG shot for drama in its high-profile press conferences, in which eye-catching numbers were trumpeted that became firmly ensconced in our collective memory. The 2G report was brandished triumphantly, like a World Cup trophy, in what appeared less an exercise in informing the public and Parliament than in a submission to prime-time sensationalism. The estimate of the presumptive loss to the treasury from the licencing process was questioned almost immediately; naturally, given that the figure insisted on, Rs 1.76 lakh crore, was so enormous, so outlandish.<br /><br />It seems, now, that the CAG&rsquo;s hubris was even greater than previously suspected. So intent were the agency&rsquo;s leaders on the higher figure that lower estimates from those closer to the subject were ignored; and, as this newspaper reported on Saturday, the lead auditor was discouraged by the agency&rsquo;s head, Vinod Rai, from asking for the response of the department of telecommunications to the CAG&rsquo;s suppositions. The refusal to allow the DoT to explain itself violates simple principles of justice and our sense of due process. The auditor in question, R.P. Singh, was supposedly the one conducting the 2G audit, and he had estimated the losses Rs 2,645 crore &mdash; a number substantially different than the final report&rsquo;s Rs 1.76 lakh crore. That was tacked together using various different methods &mdash; most remarkably, by directly comparing values from the 3G auction last year to the 2G licencing process half a decade earlier.<br /><br />Earlier this year, the prime minister pointed out that, if auctions have not taken place, calculating any loss is deeply problematic: &ldquo;There are various estimates, but you have to assess what is the right magnitude after asking yourself what was the right price.&rdquo; When the losses you are trying to calculate are presumptive, your assumptions matter. And, thanks partly to the Right to Information Act, which was designed precisely to uncover such establishmentarian excess and subterfuge, it seems clear now that the CAG wanted to jerry-rig the assumptions to give us the largest, most staggering figure for the loss possible, like a big-talking hunter would exaggerate the size of the tiger he shot. This is worryingly irresponsible. The CAG has an important role to play in helping Parliament oversee the executive&rsquo;s expenditure; it seems a pity that it is bent on undermining its own credibility.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/a-big-loss-10370.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | A big loss | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Indian Express The Comptroller and Auditor General of India is being increasingly questioned, as reports emerge about the divisions within the agency on calculating the loss to the public exchequer from the 2G licencing process. The CAG shot for drama..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>A big loss</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p>-The Indian Express</p><p> </p><div align="justify">The Comptroller and Auditor General of India is being increasingly questioned, as reports emerge about the divisions within the agency on calculating the loss to the public exchequer from the 2G licencing process. The CAG shot for drama in its high-profile press conferences, in which eye-catching numbers were trumpeted that became firmly ensconced in our collective memory. The 2G report was brandished triumphantly, like a World Cup trophy, in what appeared less an exercise in informing the public and Parliament than in a submission to prime-time sensationalism. The estimate of the presumptive loss to the treasury from the licencing process was questioned almost immediately; naturally, given that the figure insisted on, Rs 1.76 lakh crore, was so enormous, so outlandish.<br /><br />It seems, now, that the CAG’s hubris was even greater than previously suspected. So intent were the agency’s leaders on the higher figure that lower estimates from those closer to the subject were ignored; and, as this newspaper reported on Saturday, the lead auditor was discouraged by the agency’s head, Vinod Rai, from asking for the response of the department of telecommunications to the CAG’s suppositions. The refusal to allow the DoT to explain itself violates simple principles of justice and our sense of due process. The auditor in question, R.P. Singh, was supposedly the one conducting the 2G audit, and he had estimated the losses Rs 2,645 crore — a number substantially different than the final report’s Rs 1.76 lakh crore. That was tacked together using various different methods — most remarkably, by directly comparing values from the 3G auction last year to the 2G licencing process half a decade earlier.<br /><br />Earlier this year, the prime minister pointed out that, if auctions have not taken place, calculating any loss is deeply problematic: “There are various estimates, but you have to assess what is the right magnitude after asking yourself what was the right price.” When the losses you are trying to calculate are presumptive, your assumptions matter. And, thanks partly to the Right to Information Act, which was designed precisely to uncover such establishmentarian excess and subterfuge, it seems clear now that the CAG wanted to jerry-rig the assumptions to give us the largest, most staggering figure for the loss possible, like a big-talking hunter would exaggerate the size of the tiger he shot. This is worryingly irresponsible. The CAG has an important role to play in helping Parliament oversee the executive’s expenditure; it seems a pity that it is bent on undermining its own credibility.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10259, 'title' => 'A big loss', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p> -The Indian Express </p> <p> </p> <div align="justify"> The Comptroller and Auditor General of India is being increasingly questioned, as reports emerge about the divisions within the agency on calculating the loss to the public exchequer from the 2G licencing process. The CAG shot for drama in its high-profile press conferences, in which eye-catching numbers were trumpeted that became firmly ensconced in our collective memory. The 2G report was brandished triumphantly, like a World Cup trophy, in what appeared less an exercise in informing the public and Parliament than in a submission to prime-time sensationalism. The estimate of the presumptive loss to the treasury from the licencing process was questioned almost immediately; naturally, given that the figure insisted on, Rs 1.76 lakh crore, was so enormous, so outlandish.<br /> <br /> It seems, now, that the CAG’s hubris was even greater than previously suspected. So intent were the agency’s leaders on the higher figure that lower estimates from those closer to the subject were ignored; and, as this newspaper reported on Saturday, the lead auditor was discouraged by the agency’s head, Vinod Rai, from asking for the response of the department of telecommunications to the CAG’s suppositions. The refusal to allow the DoT to explain itself violates simple principles of justice and our sense of due process. The auditor in question, R.P. Singh, was supposedly the one conducting the 2G audit, and he had estimated the losses Rs 2,645 crore — a number substantially different than the final report’s Rs 1.76 lakh crore. That was tacked together using various different methods — most remarkably, by directly comparing values from the 3G auction last year to the 2G licencing process half a decade earlier.<br /> <br /> Earlier this year, the prime minister pointed out that, if auctions have not taken place, calculating any loss is deeply problematic: “There are various estimates, but you have to assess what is the right magnitude after asking yourself what was the right price.” When the losses you are trying to calculate are presumptive, your assumptions matter. And, thanks partly to the Right to Information Act, which was designed precisely to uncover such establishmentarian excess and subterfuge, it seems clear now that the CAG wanted to jerry-rig the assumptions to give us the largest, most staggering figure for the loss possible, like a big-talking hunter would exaggerate the size of the tiger he shot. This is worryingly irresponsible. The CAG has an important role to play in helping Parliament oversee the executive’s expenditure; it seems a pity that it is bent on undermining its own credibility. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 3 October, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/a-big-loss/854675/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'a-big-loss-10370', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10370, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 10259, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | A big loss', 'metaKeywords' => 'Comptroller and Auditor-General,CAG,Corruption', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Indian Express The Comptroller and Auditor General of India is being increasingly questioned, as reports emerge about the divisions within the agency on calculating the loss to the public exchequer from the 2G licencing process. The CAG shot for drama...', 'disp' => '<p>-The Indian Express</p><p> </p><div align="justify">The Comptroller and Auditor General of India is being increasingly questioned, as reports emerge about the divisions within the agency on calculating the loss to the public exchequer from the 2G licencing process. The CAG shot for drama in its high-profile press conferences, in which eye-catching numbers were trumpeted that became firmly ensconced in our collective memory. The 2G report was brandished triumphantly, like a World Cup trophy, in what appeared less an exercise in informing the public and Parliament than in a submission to prime-time sensationalism. The estimate of the presumptive loss to the treasury from the licencing process was questioned almost immediately; naturally, given that the figure insisted on, Rs 1.76 lakh crore, was so enormous, so outlandish.<br /><br />It seems, now, that the CAG’s hubris was even greater than previously suspected. So intent were the agency’s leaders on the higher figure that lower estimates from those closer to the subject were ignored; and, as this newspaper reported on Saturday, the lead auditor was discouraged by the agency’s head, Vinod Rai, from asking for the response of the department of telecommunications to the CAG’s suppositions. The refusal to allow the DoT to explain itself violates simple principles of justice and our sense of due process. The auditor in question, R.P. Singh, was supposedly the one conducting the 2G audit, and he had estimated the losses Rs 2,645 crore — a number substantially different than the final report’s Rs 1.76 lakh crore. That was tacked together using various different methods — most remarkably, by directly comparing values from the 3G auction last year to the 2G licencing process half a decade earlier.<br /><br />Earlier this year, the prime minister pointed out that, if auctions have not taken place, calculating any loss is deeply problematic: “There are various estimates, but you have to assess what is the right magnitude after asking yourself what was the right price.” When the losses you are trying to calculate are presumptive, your assumptions matter. And, thanks partly to the Right to Information Act, which was designed precisely to uncover such establishmentarian excess and subterfuge, it seems clear now that the CAG wanted to jerry-rig the assumptions to give us the largest, most staggering figure for the loss possible, like a big-talking hunter would exaggerate the size of the tiger he shot. This is worryingly irresponsible. The CAG has an important role to play in helping Parliament oversee the executive’s expenditure; it seems a pity that it is bent on undermining its own credibility.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10259, 'title' => 'A big loss', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p> -The Indian Express </p> <p> </p> <div align="justify"> The Comptroller and Auditor General of India is being increasingly questioned, as reports emerge about the divisions within the agency on calculating the loss to the public exchequer from the 2G licencing process. The CAG shot for drama in its high-profile press conferences, in which eye-catching numbers were trumpeted that became firmly ensconced in our collective memory. The 2G report was brandished triumphantly, like a World Cup trophy, in what appeared less an exercise in informing the public and Parliament than in a submission to prime-time sensationalism. The estimate of the presumptive loss to the treasury from the licencing process was questioned almost immediately; naturally, given that the figure insisted on, Rs 1.76 lakh crore, was so enormous, so outlandish.<br /> <br /> It seems, now, that the CAG’s hubris was even greater than previously suspected. So intent were the agency’s leaders on the higher figure that lower estimates from those closer to the subject were ignored; and, as this newspaper reported on Saturday, the lead auditor was discouraged by the agency’s head, Vinod Rai, from asking for the response of the department of telecommunications to the CAG’s suppositions. The refusal to allow the DoT to explain itself violates simple principles of justice and our sense of due process. The auditor in question, R.P. Singh, was supposedly the one conducting the 2G audit, and he had estimated the losses Rs 2,645 crore — a number substantially different than the final report’s Rs 1.76 lakh crore. That was tacked together using various different methods — most remarkably, by directly comparing values from the 3G auction last year to the 2G licencing process half a decade earlier.<br /> <br /> Earlier this year, the prime minister pointed out that, if auctions have not taken place, calculating any loss is deeply problematic: “There are various estimates, but you have to assess what is the right magnitude after asking yourself what was the right price.” When the losses you are trying to calculate are presumptive, your assumptions matter. And, thanks partly to the Right to Information Act, which was designed precisely to uncover such establishmentarian excess and subterfuge, it seems clear now that the CAG wanted to jerry-rig the assumptions to give us the largest, most staggering figure for the loss possible, like a big-talking hunter would exaggerate the size of the tiger he shot. This is worryingly irresponsible. The CAG has an important role to play in helping Parliament oversee the executive’s expenditure; it seems a pity that it is bent on undermining its own credibility. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 3 October, 2011, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/a-big-loss/854675/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'a-big-loss-10370', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10370, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 10259 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | A big loss' $metaKeywords = 'Comptroller and Auditor-General,CAG,Corruption' $metaDesc = ' -The Indian Express The Comptroller and Auditor General of India is being increasingly questioned, as reports emerge about the divisions within the agency on calculating the loss to the public exchequer from the 2G licencing process. The CAG shot for drama...' $disp = '<p>-The Indian Express</p><p> </p><div align="justify">The Comptroller and Auditor General of India is being increasingly questioned, as reports emerge about the divisions within the agency on calculating the loss to the public exchequer from the 2G licencing process. The CAG shot for drama in its high-profile press conferences, in which eye-catching numbers were trumpeted that became firmly ensconced in our collective memory. The 2G report was brandished triumphantly, like a World Cup trophy, in what appeared less an exercise in informing the public and Parliament than in a submission to prime-time sensationalism. The estimate of the presumptive loss to the treasury from the licencing process was questioned almost immediately; naturally, given that the figure insisted on, Rs 1.76 lakh crore, was so enormous, so outlandish.<br /><br />It seems, now, that the CAG’s hubris was even greater than previously suspected. So intent were the agency’s leaders on the higher figure that lower estimates from those closer to the subject were ignored; and, as this newspaper reported on Saturday, the lead auditor was discouraged by the agency’s head, Vinod Rai, from asking for the response of the department of telecommunications to the CAG’s suppositions. The refusal to allow the DoT to explain itself violates simple principles of justice and our sense of due process. The auditor in question, R.P. Singh, was supposedly the one conducting the 2G audit, and he had estimated the losses Rs 2,645 crore — a number substantially different than the final report’s Rs 1.76 lakh crore. That was tacked together using various different methods — most remarkably, by directly comparing values from the 3G auction last year to the 2G licencing process half a decade earlier.<br /><br />Earlier this year, the prime minister pointed out that, if auctions have not taken place, calculating any loss is deeply problematic: “There are various estimates, but you have to assess what is the right magnitude after asking yourself what was the right price.” When the losses you are trying to calculate are presumptive, your assumptions matter. And, thanks partly to the Right to Information Act, which was designed precisely to uncover such establishmentarian excess and subterfuge, it seems clear now that the CAG wanted to jerry-rig the assumptions to give us the largest, most staggering figure for the loss possible, like a big-talking hunter would exaggerate the size of the tiger he shot. This is worryingly irresponsible. The CAG has an important role to play in helping Parliament oversee the executive’s expenditure; it seems a pity that it is bent on undermining its own credibility.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
A big loss |
-The Indian Express
The Comptroller and Auditor General of India is being increasingly questioned, as reports emerge about the divisions within the agency on calculating the loss to the public exchequer from the 2G licencing process. The CAG shot for drama in its high-profile press conferences, in which eye-catching numbers were trumpeted that became firmly ensconced in our collective memory. The 2G report was brandished triumphantly, like a World Cup trophy, in what appeared less an exercise in informing the public and Parliament than in a submission to prime-time sensationalism. The estimate of the presumptive loss to the treasury from the licencing process was questioned almost immediately; naturally, given that the figure insisted on, Rs 1.76 lakh crore, was so enormous, so outlandish.
It seems, now, that the CAG’s hubris was even greater than previously suspected. So intent were the agency’s leaders on the higher figure that lower estimates from those closer to the subject were ignored; and, as this newspaper reported on Saturday, the lead auditor was discouraged by the agency’s head, Vinod Rai, from asking for the response of the department of telecommunications to the CAG’s suppositions. The refusal to allow the DoT to explain itself violates simple principles of justice and our sense of due process. The auditor in question, R.P. Singh, was supposedly the one conducting the 2G audit, and he had estimated the losses Rs 2,645 crore — a number substantially different than the final report’s Rs 1.76 lakh crore. That was tacked together using various different methods — most remarkably, by directly comparing values from the 3G auction last year to the 2G licencing process half a decade earlier. Earlier this year, the prime minister pointed out that, if auctions have not taken place, calculating any loss is deeply problematic: “There are various estimates, but you have to assess what is the right magnitude after asking yourself what was the right price.” When the losses you are trying to calculate are presumptive, your assumptions matter. And, thanks partly to the Right to Information Act, which was designed precisely to uncover such establishmentarian excess and subterfuge, it seems clear now that the CAG wanted to jerry-rig the assumptions to give us the largest, most staggering figure for the loss possible, like a big-talking hunter would exaggerate the size of the tiger he shot. This is worryingly irresponsible. The CAG has an important role to play in helping Parliament oversee the executive’s expenditure; it seems a pity that it is bent on undermining its own credibility. |