Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/a-judgement-some-worries-17082/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/a-judgement-some-worries-17082/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/a-judgement-some-worries-17082/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/a-judgement-some-worries-17082/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6818f00d89cf9-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6818f00d89cf9-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6818f00d89cf9-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6818f00d89cf9-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6818f00d89cf9-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6818f00d89cf9-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6818f00d89cf9-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6818f00d89cf9-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6818f00d89cf9-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 16954, 'title' => 'A judgement &amp; some worries', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -Live Mint </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>The judgement whittles down an already embattled freedom available to the Press&nbsp;</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In an important judgement it delivered on Tuesday, the Supreme Court has institutionalized the power to temporarily prohibit the Press from reporting court proceedings in case it interferes with the right to a free and fair trial. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> While the court shied from prescribing guidelines for the Press on court reporting, in the same breath it allowed individuals and companies to approach higher courts for passing of orders that temporarily prohibit reporting of such proceedings. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The right to a free and fair trial is already available under the right to protection of life and personal liberty (Article 21 of the Constitution). The generalized power to pass orders to postpone reporting of court proceedings is a &ldquo;neutralizing device&rdquo; to give meaning to this power. This is something new to Indian jurisprudence. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court has argued that, &ldquo;&hellip;anyone, be he an accused or an aggrieved person, who genuinely apprehends on the basis of the content of the publication and its effect, an infringement of his/her rights under Article 21 to a fair trial and all that it comprehends, would be entitled to approach an appropriate writ court and seek an order of postponement of the offending publication/broadcast or postponement of reporting of certain phases of the trial (including identity of the victim or the witness or the complainant), and that the court may grant such preventive relief&hellip;&rdquo; (Para 43 of the judgement delivered in the case of Sahara India Real Estate Corp Ltd &amp; ors vs Securities and Exchange Board of India &amp; anr). </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The import of the court&rsquo;s judgement lies elsewhere. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> India is passing through a difficult phase in its history. The government of the day is embroiled in scandals involving huge sums of money. From the 2G spectrum allocation case to the coal block allotment issue, among others, the government&rsquo;s actions have fuelled cronyism in a manner not seen before since independence. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In such conditions, companies involved in dubious deals and officials and politicians who have much to hide have been provided a legal roof to stymie freedom of journalists to report without fear. While the court has passed a very reasonable order, its institutionalization of postponement of reporting court proceedings as a &ldquo;neutralizing device&rdquo;, has wider implications. As it is, it is difficult to report on companies that do not report in a transparent manner. After this judgement, such companies will be emboldened to approach the higher courts for restraints on the Press. In fact, it will be unusual if they don&rsquo;t do so. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> While the court prescribed tests of reasonableness, among others, on deciding issues of postponement, time is of the essence for media and citizens dependent on it for information. It is not far-fetched to presume that during this period of stasis, reporters and editors, can be arm-twisted into submission. The judgement whittles down an already embattled freedom available to the Press. It will add psychological pressure and uncertainty in an already difficult environment. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Live Mint, 11 September, 2012, http://www.livemint.com/Opinion/NdW9rzJAFGv1LxDd5xMQmI/A-judgement--some-worries.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'a-judgement-some-worries-17082', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17082, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 16954, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | A judgement &amp; some worries', 'metaKeywords' => 'media,Freedom of Speech,Law and Justice', 'metaDesc' => ' -Live Mint The judgement whittles down an already embattled freedom available to the Press&nbsp; In an important judgement it delivered on Tuesday, the Supreme Court has institutionalized the power to temporarily prohibit the Press from reporting court proceedings in case it interferes...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-Live Mint</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>The judgement whittles down an already embattled freedom available to the Press&nbsp;</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In an important judgement it delivered on Tuesday, the Supreme Court has institutionalized the power to temporarily prohibit the Press from reporting court proceedings in case it interferes with the right to a free and fair trial.</div><div style="text-align: justify">While the court shied from prescribing guidelines for the Press on court reporting, in the same breath it allowed individuals and companies to approach higher courts for passing of orders that temporarily prohibit reporting of such proceedings.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The right to a free and fair trial is already available under the right to protection of life and personal liberty (Article 21 of the Constitution). The generalized power to pass orders to postpone reporting of court proceedings is a &ldquo;neutralizing device&rdquo; to give meaning to this power. This is something new to Indian jurisprudence.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court has argued that, &ldquo;&hellip;anyone, be he an accused or an aggrieved person, who genuinely apprehends on the basis of the content of the publication and its effect, an infringement of his/her rights under Article 21 to a fair trial and all that it comprehends, would be entitled to approach an appropriate writ court and seek an order of postponement of the offending publication/broadcast or postponement of reporting of certain phases of the trial (including identity of the victim or the witness or the complainant), and that the court may grant such preventive relief&hellip;&rdquo; (Para 43 of the judgement delivered in the case of Sahara India Real Estate Corp Ltd &amp; ors vs Securities and Exchange Board of India &amp; anr).</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The import of the court&rsquo;s judgement lies elsewhere.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">India is passing through a difficult phase in its history. The government of the day is embroiled in scandals involving huge sums of money. From the 2G spectrum allocation case to the coal block allotment issue, among others, the government&rsquo;s actions have fuelled cronyism in a manner not seen before since independence.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In such conditions, companies involved in dubious deals and officials and politicians who have much to hide have been provided a legal roof to stymie freedom of journalists to report without fear. While the court has passed a very reasonable order, its institutionalization of postponement of reporting court proceedings as a &ldquo;neutralizing device&rdquo;, has wider implications. As it is, it is difficult to report on companies that do not report in a transparent manner. After this judgement, such companies will be emboldened to approach the higher courts for restraints on the Press. In fact, it will be unusual if they don&rsquo;t do so.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">While the court prescribed tests of reasonableness, among others, on deciding issues of postponement, time is of the essence for media and citizens dependent on it for information. It is not far-fetched to presume that during this period of stasis, reporters and editors, can be arm-twisted into submission. The judgement whittles down an already embattled freedom available to the Press. It will add psychological pressure and uncertainty in an already difficult environment.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 16954, 'title' => 'A judgement &amp; some worries', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -Live Mint </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>The judgement whittles down an already embattled freedom available to the Press&nbsp;</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In an important judgement it delivered on Tuesday, the Supreme Court has institutionalized the power to temporarily prohibit the Press from reporting court proceedings in case it interferes with the right to a free and fair trial. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> While the court shied from prescribing guidelines for the Press on court reporting, in the same breath it allowed individuals and companies to approach higher courts for passing of orders that temporarily prohibit reporting of such proceedings. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The right to a free and fair trial is already available under the right to protection of life and personal liberty (Article 21 of the Constitution). The generalized power to pass orders to postpone reporting of court proceedings is a &ldquo;neutralizing device&rdquo; to give meaning to this power. This is something new to Indian jurisprudence. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court has argued that, &ldquo;&hellip;anyone, be he an accused or an aggrieved person, who genuinely apprehends on the basis of the content of the publication and its effect, an infringement of his/her rights under Article 21 to a fair trial and all that it comprehends, would be entitled to approach an appropriate writ court and seek an order of postponement of the offending publication/broadcast or postponement of reporting of certain phases of the trial (including identity of the victim or the witness or the complainant), and that the court may grant such preventive relief&hellip;&rdquo; (Para 43 of the judgement delivered in the case of Sahara India Real Estate Corp Ltd &amp; ors vs Securities and Exchange Board of India &amp; anr). </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The import of the court&rsquo;s judgement lies elsewhere. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> India is passing through a difficult phase in its history. The government of the day is embroiled in scandals involving huge sums of money. From the 2G spectrum allocation case to the coal block allotment issue, among others, the government&rsquo;s actions have fuelled cronyism in a manner not seen before since independence. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In such conditions, companies involved in dubious deals and officials and politicians who have much to hide have been provided a legal roof to stymie freedom of journalists to report without fear. While the court has passed a very reasonable order, its institutionalization of postponement of reporting court proceedings as a &ldquo;neutralizing device&rdquo;, has wider implications. As it is, it is difficult to report on companies that do not report in a transparent manner. After this judgement, such companies will be emboldened to approach the higher courts for restraints on the Press. In fact, it will be unusual if they don&rsquo;t do so. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> While the court prescribed tests of reasonableness, among others, on deciding issues of postponement, time is of the essence for media and citizens dependent on it for information. It is not far-fetched to presume that during this period of stasis, reporters and editors, can be arm-twisted into submission. The judgement whittles down an already embattled freedom available to the Press. It will add psychological pressure and uncertainty in an already difficult environment. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Live Mint, 11 September, 2012, http://www.livemint.com/Opinion/NdW9rzJAFGv1LxDd5xMQmI/A-judgement--some-worries.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'a-judgement-some-worries-17082', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17082, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 16954 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | A judgement &amp; some worries' $metaKeywords = 'media,Freedom of Speech,Law and Justice' $metaDesc = ' -Live Mint The judgement whittles down an already embattled freedom available to the Press&nbsp; In an important judgement it delivered on Tuesday, the Supreme Court has institutionalized the power to temporarily prohibit the Press from reporting court proceedings in case it interferes...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-Live Mint</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>The judgement whittles down an already embattled freedom available to the Press&nbsp;</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In an important judgement it delivered on Tuesday, the Supreme Court has institutionalized the power to temporarily prohibit the Press from reporting court proceedings in case it interferes with the right to a free and fair trial.</div><div style="text-align: justify">While the court shied from prescribing guidelines for the Press on court reporting, in the same breath it allowed individuals and companies to approach higher courts for passing of orders that temporarily prohibit reporting of such proceedings.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The right to a free and fair trial is already available under the right to protection of life and personal liberty (Article 21 of the Constitution). The generalized power to pass orders to postpone reporting of court proceedings is a &ldquo;neutralizing device&rdquo; to give meaning to this power. This is something new to Indian jurisprudence.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court has argued that, &ldquo;&hellip;anyone, be he an accused or an aggrieved person, who genuinely apprehends on the basis of the content of the publication and its effect, an infringement of his/her rights under Article 21 to a fair trial and all that it comprehends, would be entitled to approach an appropriate writ court and seek an order of postponement of the offending publication/broadcast or postponement of reporting of certain phases of the trial (including identity of the victim or the witness or the complainant), and that the court may grant such preventive relief&hellip;&rdquo; (Para 43 of the judgement delivered in the case of Sahara India Real Estate Corp Ltd &amp; ors vs Securities and Exchange Board of India &amp; anr).</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The import of the court&rsquo;s judgement lies elsewhere.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">India is passing through a difficult phase in its history. The government of the day is embroiled in scandals involving huge sums of money. From the 2G spectrum allocation case to the coal block allotment issue, among others, the government&rsquo;s actions have fuelled cronyism in a manner not seen before since independence.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In such conditions, companies involved in dubious deals and officials and politicians who have much to hide have been provided a legal roof to stymie freedom of journalists to report without fear. While the court has passed a very reasonable order, its institutionalization of postponement of reporting court proceedings as a &ldquo;neutralizing device&rdquo;, has wider implications. As it is, it is difficult to report on companies that do not report in a transparent manner. After this judgement, such companies will be emboldened to approach the higher courts for restraints on the Press. In fact, it will be unusual if they don&rsquo;t do so.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">While the court prescribed tests of reasonableness, among others, on deciding issues of postponement, time is of the essence for media and citizens dependent on it for information. It is not far-fetched to presume that during this period of stasis, reporters and editors, can be arm-twisted into submission. The judgement whittles down an already embattled freedom available to the Press. It will add psychological pressure and uncertainty in an already difficult environment.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/a-judgement-some-worries-17082.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | A judgement & some worries | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -Live Mint The judgement whittles down an already embattled freedom available to the Press In an important judgement it delivered on Tuesday, the Supreme Court has institutionalized the power to temporarily prohibit the Press from reporting court proceedings in case it interferes..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>A judgement & some worries</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-Live Mint</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>The judgement whittles down an already embattled freedom available to the Press </em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In an important judgement it delivered on Tuesday, the Supreme Court has institutionalized the power to temporarily prohibit the Press from reporting court proceedings in case it interferes with the right to a free and fair trial.</div><div style="text-align: justify">While the court shied from prescribing guidelines for the Press on court reporting, in the same breath it allowed individuals and companies to approach higher courts for passing of orders that temporarily prohibit reporting of such proceedings.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The right to a free and fair trial is already available under the right to protection of life and personal liberty (Article 21 of the Constitution). The generalized power to pass orders to postpone reporting of court proceedings is a “neutralizing device” to give meaning to this power. This is something new to Indian jurisprudence.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court has argued that, “…anyone, be he an accused or an aggrieved person, who genuinely apprehends on the basis of the content of the publication and its effect, an infringement of his/her rights under Article 21 to a fair trial and all that it comprehends, would be entitled to approach an appropriate writ court and seek an order of postponement of the offending publication/broadcast or postponement of reporting of certain phases of the trial (including identity of the victim or the witness or the complainant), and that the court may grant such preventive relief…” (Para 43 of the judgement delivered in the case of Sahara India Real Estate Corp Ltd & ors vs Securities and Exchange Board of India & anr).</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">The import of the court’s judgement lies elsewhere.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">India is passing through a difficult phase in its history. The government of the day is embroiled in scandals involving huge sums of money. From the 2G spectrum allocation case to the coal block allotment issue, among others, the government’s actions have fuelled cronyism in a manner not seen before since independence.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In such conditions, companies involved in dubious deals and officials and politicians who have much to hide have been provided a legal roof to stymie freedom of journalists to report without fear. While the court has passed a very reasonable order, its institutionalization of postponement of reporting court proceedings as a “neutralizing device”, has wider implications. As it is, it is difficult to report on companies that do not report in a transparent manner. After this judgement, such companies will be emboldened to approach the higher courts for restraints on the Press. In fact, it will be unusual if they don’t do so.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">While the court prescribed tests of reasonableness, among others, on deciding issues of postponement, time is of the essence for media and citizens dependent on it for information. It is not far-fetched to presume that during this period of stasis, reporters and editors, can be arm-twisted into submission. The judgement whittles down an already embattled freedom available to the Press. It will add psychological pressure and uncertainty in an already difficult environment.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6818f00d89cf9-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6818f00d89cf9-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6818f00d89cf9-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6818f00d89cf9-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6818f00d89cf9-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6818f00d89cf9-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6818f00d89cf9-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6818f00d89cf9-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6818f00d89cf9-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 16954, 'title' => 'A judgement &amp; some worries', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -Live Mint </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>The judgement whittles down an already embattled freedom available to the Press&nbsp;</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In an important judgement it delivered on Tuesday, the Supreme Court has institutionalized the power to temporarily prohibit the Press from reporting court proceedings in case it interferes with the right to a free and fair trial. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> While the court shied from prescribing guidelines for the Press on court reporting, in the same breath it allowed individuals and companies to approach higher courts for passing of orders that temporarily prohibit reporting of such proceedings. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The right to a free and fair trial is already available under the right to protection of life and personal liberty (Article 21 of the Constitution). The generalized power to pass orders to postpone reporting of court proceedings is a &ldquo;neutralizing device&rdquo; to give meaning to this power. This is something new to Indian jurisprudence. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court has argued that, &ldquo;&hellip;anyone, be he an accused or an aggrieved person, who genuinely apprehends on the basis of the content of the publication and its effect, an infringement of his/her rights under Article 21 to a fair trial and all that it comprehends, would be entitled to approach an appropriate writ court and seek an order of postponement of the offending publication/broadcast or postponement of reporting of certain phases of the trial (including identity of the victim or the witness or the complainant), and that the court may grant such preventive relief&hellip;&rdquo; (Para 43 of the judgement delivered in the case of Sahara India Real Estate Corp Ltd &amp; ors vs Securities and Exchange Board of India &amp; anr). </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The import of the court&rsquo;s judgement lies elsewhere. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> India is passing through a difficult phase in its history. The government of the day is embroiled in scandals involving huge sums of money. From the 2G spectrum allocation case to the coal block allotment issue, among others, the government&rsquo;s actions have fuelled cronyism in a manner not seen before since independence. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In such conditions, companies involved in dubious deals and officials and politicians who have much to hide have been provided a legal roof to stymie freedom of journalists to report without fear. While the court has passed a very reasonable order, its institutionalization of postponement of reporting court proceedings as a &ldquo;neutralizing device&rdquo;, has wider implications. As it is, it is difficult to report on companies that do not report in a transparent manner. After this judgement, such companies will be emboldened to approach the higher courts for restraints on the Press. In fact, it will be unusual if they don&rsquo;t do so. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> While the court prescribed tests of reasonableness, among others, on deciding issues of postponement, time is of the essence for media and citizens dependent on it for information. It is not far-fetched to presume that during this period of stasis, reporters and editors, can be arm-twisted into submission. The judgement whittles down an already embattled freedom available to the Press. It will add psychological pressure and uncertainty in an already difficult environment. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Live Mint, 11 September, 2012, http://www.livemint.com/Opinion/NdW9rzJAFGv1LxDd5xMQmI/A-judgement--some-worries.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'a-judgement-some-worries-17082', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17082, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 16954, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | A judgement &amp; some worries', 'metaKeywords' => 'media,Freedom of Speech,Law and Justice', 'metaDesc' => ' -Live Mint The judgement whittles down an already embattled freedom available to the Press&nbsp; In an important judgement it delivered on Tuesday, the Supreme Court has institutionalized the power to temporarily prohibit the Press from reporting court proceedings in case it interferes...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-Live Mint</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>The judgement whittles down an already embattled freedom available to the Press&nbsp;</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In an important judgement it delivered on Tuesday, the Supreme Court has institutionalized the power to temporarily prohibit the Press from reporting court proceedings in case it interferes with the right to a free and fair trial.</div><div style="text-align: justify">While the court shied from prescribing guidelines for the Press on court reporting, in the same breath it allowed individuals and companies to approach higher courts for passing of orders that temporarily prohibit reporting of such proceedings.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The right to a free and fair trial is already available under the right to protection of life and personal liberty (Article 21 of the Constitution). The generalized power to pass orders to postpone reporting of court proceedings is a &ldquo;neutralizing device&rdquo; to give meaning to this power. This is something new to Indian jurisprudence.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court has argued that, &ldquo;&hellip;anyone, be he an accused or an aggrieved person, who genuinely apprehends on the basis of the content of the publication and its effect, an infringement of his/her rights under Article 21 to a fair trial and all that it comprehends, would be entitled to approach an appropriate writ court and seek an order of postponement of the offending publication/broadcast or postponement of reporting of certain phases of the trial (including identity of the victim or the witness or the complainant), and that the court may grant such preventive relief&hellip;&rdquo; (Para 43 of the judgement delivered in the case of Sahara India Real Estate Corp Ltd &amp; ors vs Securities and Exchange Board of India &amp; anr).</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The import of the court&rsquo;s judgement lies elsewhere.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">India is passing through a difficult phase in its history. The government of the day is embroiled in scandals involving huge sums of money. From the 2G spectrum allocation case to the coal block allotment issue, among others, the government&rsquo;s actions have fuelled cronyism in a manner not seen before since independence.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In such conditions, companies involved in dubious deals and officials and politicians who have much to hide have been provided a legal roof to stymie freedom of journalists to report without fear. While the court has passed a very reasonable order, its institutionalization of postponement of reporting court proceedings as a &ldquo;neutralizing device&rdquo;, has wider implications. As it is, it is difficult to report on companies that do not report in a transparent manner. After this judgement, such companies will be emboldened to approach the higher courts for restraints on the Press. In fact, it will be unusual if they don&rsquo;t do so.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">While the court prescribed tests of reasonableness, among others, on deciding issues of postponement, time is of the essence for media and citizens dependent on it for information. It is not far-fetched to presume that during this period of stasis, reporters and editors, can be arm-twisted into submission. The judgement whittles down an already embattled freedom available to the Press. It will add psychological pressure and uncertainty in an already difficult environment.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 16954, 'title' => 'A judgement &amp; some worries', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -Live Mint </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>The judgement whittles down an already embattled freedom available to the Press&nbsp;</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In an important judgement it delivered on Tuesday, the Supreme Court has institutionalized the power to temporarily prohibit the Press from reporting court proceedings in case it interferes with the right to a free and fair trial. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> While the court shied from prescribing guidelines for the Press on court reporting, in the same breath it allowed individuals and companies to approach higher courts for passing of orders that temporarily prohibit reporting of such proceedings. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The right to a free and fair trial is already available under the right to protection of life and personal liberty (Article 21 of the Constitution). The generalized power to pass orders to postpone reporting of court proceedings is a &ldquo;neutralizing device&rdquo; to give meaning to this power. This is something new to Indian jurisprudence. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court has argued that, &ldquo;&hellip;anyone, be he an accused or an aggrieved person, who genuinely apprehends on the basis of the content of the publication and its effect, an infringement of his/her rights under Article 21 to a fair trial and all that it comprehends, would be entitled to approach an appropriate writ court and seek an order of postponement of the offending publication/broadcast or postponement of reporting of certain phases of the trial (including identity of the victim or the witness or the complainant), and that the court may grant such preventive relief&hellip;&rdquo; (Para 43 of the judgement delivered in the case of Sahara India Real Estate Corp Ltd &amp; ors vs Securities and Exchange Board of India &amp; anr). </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The import of the court&rsquo;s judgement lies elsewhere. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> India is passing through a difficult phase in its history. The government of the day is embroiled in scandals involving huge sums of money. From the 2G spectrum allocation case to the coal block allotment issue, among others, the government&rsquo;s actions have fuelled cronyism in a manner not seen before since independence. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In such conditions, companies involved in dubious deals and officials and politicians who have much to hide have been provided a legal roof to stymie freedom of journalists to report without fear. While the court has passed a very reasonable order, its institutionalization of postponement of reporting court proceedings as a &ldquo;neutralizing device&rdquo;, has wider implications. As it is, it is difficult to report on companies that do not report in a transparent manner. After this judgement, such companies will be emboldened to approach the higher courts for restraints on the Press. In fact, it will be unusual if they don&rsquo;t do so. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> While the court prescribed tests of reasonableness, among others, on deciding issues of postponement, time is of the essence for media and citizens dependent on it for information. It is not far-fetched to presume that during this period of stasis, reporters and editors, can be arm-twisted into submission. The judgement whittles down an already embattled freedom available to the Press. It will add psychological pressure and uncertainty in an already difficult environment. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Live Mint, 11 September, 2012, http://www.livemint.com/Opinion/NdW9rzJAFGv1LxDd5xMQmI/A-judgement--some-worries.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'a-judgement-some-worries-17082', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17082, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 16954 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | A judgement &amp; some worries' $metaKeywords = 'media,Freedom of Speech,Law and Justice' $metaDesc = ' -Live Mint The judgement whittles down an already embattled freedom available to the Press&nbsp; In an important judgement it delivered on Tuesday, the Supreme Court has institutionalized the power to temporarily prohibit the Press from reporting court proceedings in case it interferes...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-Live Mint</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>The judgement whittles down an already embattled freedom available to the Press&nbsp;</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In an important judgement it delivered on Tuesday, the Supreme Court has institutionalized the power to temporarily prohibit the Press from reporting court proceedings in case it interferes with the right to a free and fair trial.</div><div style="text-align: justify">While the court shied from prescribing guidelines for the Press on court reporting, in the same breath it allowed individuals and companies to approach higher courts for passing of orders that temporarily prohibit reporting of such proceedings.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The right to a free and fair trial is already available under the right to protection of life and personal liberty (Article 21 of the Constitution). The generalized power to pass orders to postpone reporting of court proceedings is a &ldquo;neutralizing device&rdquo; to give meaning to this power. This is something new to Indian jurisprudence.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court has argued that, &ldquo;&hellip;anyone, be he an accused or an aggrieved person, who genuinely apprehends on the basis of the content of the publication and its effect, an infringement of his/her rights under Article 21 to a fair trial and all that it comprehends, would be entitled to approach an appropriate writ court and seek an order of postponement of the offending publication/broadcast or postponement of reporting of certain phases of the trial (including identity of the victim or the witness or the complainant), and that the court may grant such preventive relief&hellip;&rdquo; (Para 43 of the judgement delivered in the case of Sahara India Real Estate Corp Ltd &amp; ors vs Securities and Exchange Board of India &amp; anr).</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The import of the court&rsquo;s judgement lies elsewhere.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">India is passing through a difficult phase in its history. The government of the day is embroiled in scandals involving huge sums of money. From the 2G spectrum allocation case to the coal block allotment issue, among others, the government&rsquo;s actions have fuelled cronyism in a manner not seen before since independence.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In such conditions, companies involved in dubious deals and officials and politicians who have much to hide have been provided a legal roof to stymie freedom of journalists to report without fear. While the court has passed a very reasonable order, its institutionalization of postponement of reporting court proceedings as a &ldquo;neutralizing device&rdquo;, has wider implications. As it is, it is difficult to report on companies that do not report in a transparent manner. After this judgement, such companies will be emboldened to approach the higher courts for restraints on the Press. In fact, it will be unusual if they don&rsquo;t do so.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">While the court prescribed tests of reasonableness, among others, on deciding issues of postponement, time is of the essence for media and citizens dependent on it for information. It is not far-fetched to presume that during this period of stasis, reporters and editors, can be arm-twisted into submission. The judgement whittles down an already embattled freedom available to the Press. It will add psychological pressure and uncertainty in an already difficult environment.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/a-judgement-some-worries-17082.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | A judgement & some worries | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -Live Mint The judgement whittles down an already embattled freedom available to the Press In an important judgement it delivered on Tuesday, the Supreme Court has institutionalized the power to temporarily prohibit the Press from reporting court proceedings in case it interferes..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>A judgement & some worries</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-Live Mint</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>The judgement whittles down an already embattled freedom available to the Press </em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In an important judgement it delivered on Tuesday, the Supreme Court has institutionalized the power to temporarily prohibit the Press from reporting court proceedings in case it interferes with the right to a free and fair trial.</div><div style="text-align: justify">While the court shied from prescribing guidelines for the Press on court reporting, in the same breath it allowed individuals and companies to approach higher courts for passing of orders that temporarily prohibit reporting of such proceedings.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The right to a free and fair trial is already available under the right to protection of life and personal liberty (Article 21 of the Constitution). The generalized power to pass orders to postpone reporting of court proceedings is a “neutralizing device” to give meaning to this power. This is something new to Indian jurisprudence.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court has argued that, “…anyone, be he an accused or an aggrieved person, who genuinely apprehends on the basis of the content of the publication and its effect, an infringement of his/her rights under Article 21 to a fair trial and all that it comprehends, would be entitled to approach an appropriate writ court and seek an order of postponement of the offending publication/broadcast or postponement of reporting of certain phases of the trial (including identity of the victim or the witness or the complainant), and that the court may grant such preventive relief…” (Para 43 of the judgement delivered in the case of Sahara India Real Estate Corp Ltd & ors vs Securities and Exchange Board of India & anr).</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">The import of the court’s judgement lies elsewhere.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">India is passing through a difficult phase in its history. The government of the day is embroiled in scandals involving huge sums of money. From the 2G spectrum allocation case to the coal block allotment issue, among others, the government’s actions have fuelled cronyism in a manner not seen before since independence.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In such conditions, companies involved in dubious deals and officials and politicians who have much to hide have been provided a legal roof to stymie freedom of journalists to report without fear. While the court has passed a very reasonable order, its institutionalization of postponement of reporting court proceedings as a “neutralizing device”, has wider implications. As it is, it is difficult to report on companies that do not report in a transparent manner. After this judgement, such companies will be emboldened to approach the higher courts for restraints on the Press. In fact, it will be unusual if they don’t do so.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">While the court prescribed tests of reasonableness, among others, on deciding issues of postponement, time is of the essence for media and citizens dependent on it for information. It is not far-fetched to presume that during this period of stasis, reporters and editors, can be arm-twisted into submission. The judgement whittles down an already embattled freedom available to the Press. It will add psychological pressure and uncertainty in an already difficult environment.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6818f00d89cf9-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6818f00d89cf9-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6818f00d89cf9-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6818f00d89cf9-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6818f00d89cf9-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6818f00d89cf9-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6818f00d89cf9-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6818f00d89cf9-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6818f00d89cf9-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 16954, 'title' => 'A judgement &amp; some worries', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -Live Mint </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>The judgement whittles down an already embattled freedom available to the Press&nbsp;</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In an important judgement it delivered on Tuesday, the Supreme Court has institutionalized the power to temporarily prohibit the Press from reporting court proceedings in case it interferes with the right to a free and fair trial. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> While the court shied from prescribing guidelines for the Press on court reporting, in the same breath it allowed individuals and companies to approach higher courts for passing of orders that temporarily prohibit reporting of such proceedings. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The right to a free and fair trial is already available under the right to protection of life and personal liberty (Article 21 of the Constitution). The generalized power to pass orders to postpone reporting of court proceedings is a &ldquo;neutralizing device&rdquo; to give meaning to this power. This is something new to Indian jurisprudence. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court has argued that, &ldquo;&hellip;anyone, be he an accused or an aggrieved person, who genuinely apprehends on the basis of the content of the publication and its effect, an infringement of his/her rights under Article 21 to a fair trial and all that it comprehends, would be entitled to approach an appropriate writ court and seek an order of postponement of the offending publication/broadcast or postponement of reporting of certain phases of the trial (including identity of the victim or the witness or the complainant), and that the court may grant such preventive relief&hellip;&rdquo; (Para 43 of the judgement delivered in the case of Sahara India Real Estate Corp Ltd &amp; ors vs Securities and Exchange Board of India &amp; anr). </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The import of the court&rsquo;s judgement lies elsewhere. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> India is passing through a difficult phase in its history. The government of the day is embroiled in scandals involving huge sums of money. From the 2G spectrum allocation case to the coal block allotment issue, among others, the government&rsquo;s actions have fuelled cronyism in a manner not seen before since independence. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In such conditions, companies involved in dubious deals and officials and politicians who have much to hide have been provided a legal roof to stymie freedom of journalists to report without fear. While the court has passed a very reasonable order, its institutionalization of postponement of reporting court proceedings as a &ldquo;neutralizing device&rdquo;, has wider implications. As it is, it is difficult to report on companies that do not report in a transparent manner. After this judgement, such companies will be emboldened to approach the higher courts for restraints on the Press. In fact, it will be unusual if they don&rsquo;t do so. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> While the court prescribed tests of reasonableness, among others, on deciding issues of postponement, time is of the essence for media and citizens dependent on it for information. It is not far-fetched to presume that during this period of stasis, reporters and editors, can be arm-twisted into submission. The judgement whittles down an already embattled freedom available to the Press. It will add psychological pressure and uncertainty in an already difficult environment. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Live Mint, 11 September, 2012, http://www.livemint.com/Opinion/NdW9rzJAFGv1LxDd5xMQmI/A-judgement--some-worries.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'a-judgement-some-worries-17082', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17082, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 16954, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | A judgement &amp; some worries', 'metaKeywords' => 'media,Freedom of Speech,Law and Justice', 'metaDesc' => ' -Live Mint The judgement whittles down an already embattled freedom available to the Press&nbsp; In an important judgement it delivered on Tuesday, the Supreme Court has institutionalized the power to temporarily prohibit the Press from reporting court proceedings in case it interferes...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-Live Mint</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>The judgement whittles down an already embattled freedom available to the Press&nbsp;</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In an important judgement it delivered on Tuesday, the Supreme Court has institutionalized the power to temporarily prohibit the Press from reporting court proceedings in case it interferes with the right to a free and fair trial.</div><div style="text-align: justify">While the court shied from prescribing guidelines for the Press on court reporting, in the same breath it allowed individuals and companies to approach higher courts for passing of orders that temporarily prohibit reporting of such proceedings.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The right to a free and fair trial is already available under the right to protection of life and personal liberty (Article 21 of the Constitution). The generalized power to pass orders to postpone reporting of court proceedings is a &ldquo;neutralizing device&rdquo; to give meaning to this power. This is something new to Indian jurisprudence.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court has argued that, &ldquo;&hellip;anyone, be he an accused or an aggrieved person, who genuinely apprehends on the basis of the content of the publication and its effect, an infringement of his/her rights under Article 21 to a fair trial and all that it comprehends, would be entitled to approach an appropriate writ court and seek an order of postponement of the offending publication/broadcast or postponement of reporting of certain phases of the trial (including identity of the victim or the witness or the complainant), and that the court may grant such preventive relief&hellip;&rdquo; (Para 43 of the judgement delivered in the case of Sahara India Real Estate Corp Ltd &amp; ors vs Securities and Exchange Board of India &amp; anr).</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The import of the court&rsquo;s judgement lies elsewhere.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">India is passing through a difficult phase in its history. The government of the day is embroiled in scandals involving huge sums of money. From the 2G spectrum allocation case to the coal block allotment issue, among others, the government&rsquo;s actions have fuelled cronyism in a manner not seen before since independence.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In such conditions, companies involved in dubious deals and officials and politicians who have much to hide have been provided a legal roof to stymie freedom of journalists to report without fear. While the court has passed a very reasonable order, its institutionalization of postponement of reporting court proceedings as a &ldquo;neutralizing device&rdquo;, has wider implications. As it is, it is difficult to report on companies that do not report in a transparent manner. After this judgement, such companies will be emboldened to approach the higher courts for restraints on the Press. In fact, it will be unusual if they don&rsquo;t do so.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">While the court prescribed tests of reasonableness, among others, on deciding issues of postponement, time is of the essence for media and citizens dependent on it for information. It is not far-fetched to presume that during this period of stasis, reporters and editors, can be arm-twisted into submission. The judgement whittles down an already embattled freedom available to the Press. It will add psychological pressure and uncertainty in an already difficult environment.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 16954, 'title' => 'A judgement &amp; some worries', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -Live Mint </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>The judgement whittles down an already embattled freedom available to the Press&nbsp;</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In an important judgement it delivered on Tuesday, the Supreme Court has institutionalized the power to temporarily prohibit the Press from reporting court proceedings in case it interferes with the right to a free and fair trial. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> While the court shied from prescribing guidelines for the Press on court reporting, in the same breath it allowed individuals and companies to approach higher courts for passing of orders that temporarily prohibit reporting of such proceedings. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The right to a free and fair trial is already available under the right to protection of life and personal liberty (Article 21 of the Constitution). The generalized power to pass orders to postpone reporting of court proceedings is a &ldquo;neutralizing device&rdquo; to give meaning to this power. This is something new to Indian jurisprudence. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court has argued that, &ldquo;&hellip;anyone, be he an accused or an aggrieved person, who genuinely apprehends on the basis of the content of the publication and its effect, an infringement of his/her rights under Article 21 to a fair trial and all that it comprehends, would be entitled to approach an appropriate writ court and seek an order of postponement of the offending publication/broadcast or postponement of reporting of certain phases of the trial (including identity of the victim or the witness or the complainant), and that the court may grant such preventive relief&hellip;&rdquo; (Para 43 of the judgement delivered in the case of Sahara India Real Estate Corp Ltd &amp; ors vs Securities and Exchange Board of India &amp; anr). </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The import of the court&rsquo;s judgement lies elsewhere. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> India is passing through a difficult phase in its history. The government of the day is embroiled in scandals involving huge sums of money. From the 2G spectrum allocation case to the coal block allotment issue, among others, the government&rsquo;s actions have fuelled cronyism in a manner not seen before since independence. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In such conditions, companies involved in dubious deals and officials and politicians who have much to hide have been provided a legal roof to stymie freedom of journalists to report without fear. While the court has passed a very reasonable order, its institutionalization of postponement of reporting court proceedings as a &ldquo;neutralizing device&rdquo;, has wider implications. As it is, it is difficult to report on companies that do not report in a transparent manner. After this judgement, such companies will be emboldened to approach the higher courts for restraints on the Press. In fact, it will be unusual if they don&rsquo;t do so. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> While the court prescribed tests of reasonableness, among others, on deciding issues of postponement, time is of the essence for media and citizens dependent on it for information. It is not far-fetched to presume that during this period of stasis, reporters and editors, can be arm-twisted into submission. The judgement whittles down an already embattled freedom available to the Press. It will add psychological pressure and uncertainty in an already difficult environment. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Live Mint, 11 September, 2012, http://www.livemint.com/Opinion/NdW9rzJAFGv1LxDd5xMQmI/A-judgement--some-worries.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'a-judgement-some-worries-17082', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17082, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 16954 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | A judgement &amp; some worries' $metaKeywords = 'media,Freedom of Speech,Law and Justice' $metaDesc = ' -Live Mint The judgement whittles down an already embattled freedom available to the Press&nbsp; In an important judgement it delivered on Tuesday, the Supreme Court has institutionalized the power to temporarily prohibit the Press from reporting court proceedings in case it interferes...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-Live Mint</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>The judgement whittles down an already embattled freedom available to the Press&nbsp;</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In an important judgement it delivered on Tuesday, the Supreme Court has institutionalized the power to temporarily prohibit the Press from reporting court proceedings in case it interferes with the right to a free and fair trial.</div><div style="text-align: justify">While the court shied from prescribing guidelines for the Press on court reporting, in the same breath it allowed individuals and companies to approach higher courts for passing of orders that temporarily prohibit reporting of such proceedings.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The right to a free and fair trial is already available under the right to protection of life and personal liberty (Article 21 of the Constitution). The generalized power to pass orders to postpone reporting of court proceedings is a &ldquo;neutralizing device&rdquo; to give meaning to this power. This is something new to Indian jurisprudence.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court has argued that, &ldquo;&hellip;anyone, be he an accused or an aggrieved person, who genuinely apprehends on the basis of the content of the publication and its effect, an infringement of his/her rights under Article 21 to a fair trial and all that it comprehends, would be entitled to approach an appropriate writ court and seek an order of postponement of the offending publication/broadcast or postponement of reporting of certain phases of the trial (including identity of the victim or the witness or the complainant), and that the court may grant such preventive relief&hellip;&rdquo; (Para 43 of the judgement delivered in the case of Sahara India Real Estate Corp Ltd &amp; ors vs Securities and Exchange Board of India &amp; anr).</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">The import of the court&rsquo;s judgement lies elsewhere.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">India is passing through a difficult phase in its history. The government of the day is embroiled in scandals involving huge sums of money. From the 2G spectrum allocation case to the coal block allotment issue, among others, the government&rsquo;s actions have fuelled cronyism in a manner not seen before since independence.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In such conditions, companies involved in dubious deals and officials and politicians who have much to hide have been provided a legal roof to stymie freedom of journalists to report without fear. While the court has passed a very reasonable order, its institutionalization of postponement of reporting court proceedings as a &ldquo;neutralizing device&rdquo;, has wider implications. As it is, it is difficult to report on companies that do not report in a transparent manner. After this judgement, such companies will be emboldened to approach the higher courts for restraints on the Press. In fact, it will be unusual if they don&rsquo;t do so.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">While the court prescribed tests of reasonableness, among others, on deciding issues of postponement, time is of the essence for media and citizens dependent on it for information. It is not far-fetched to presume that during this period of stasis, reporters and editors, can be arm-twisted into submission. The judgement whittles down an already embattled freedom available to the Press. It will add psychological pressure and uncertainty in an already difficult environment.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/a-judgement-some-worries-17082.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | A judgement & some worries | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -Live Mint The judgement whittles down an already embattled freedom available to the Press In an important judgement it delivered on Tuesday, the Supreme Court has institutionalized the power to temporarily prohibit the Press from reporting court proceedings in case it interferes..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>A judgement & some worries</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-Live Mint</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>The judgement whittles down an already embattled freedom available to the Press </em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In an important judgement it delivered on Tuesday, the Supreme Court has institutionalized the power to temporarily prohibit the Press from reporting court proceedings in case it interferes with the right to a free and fair trial.</div><div style="text-align: justify">While the court shied from prescribing guidelines for the Press on court reporting, in the same breath it allowed individuals and companies to approach higher courts for passing of orders that temporarily prohibit reporting of such proceedings.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The right to a free and fair trial is already available under the right to protection of life and personal liberty (Article 21 of the Constitution). The generalized power to pass orders to postpone reporting of court proceedings is a “neutralizing device” to give meaning to this power. This is something new to Indian jurisprudence.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court has argued that, “…anyone, be he an accused or an aggrieved person, who genuinely apprehends on the basis of the content of the publication and its effect, an infringement of his/her rights under Article 21 to a fair trial and all that it comprehends, would be entitled to approach an appropriate writ court and seek an order of postponement of the offending publication/broadcast or postponement of reporting of certain phases of the trial (including identity of the victim or the witness or the complainant), and that the court may grant such preventive relief…” (Para 43 of the judgement delivered in the case of Sahara India Real Estate Corp Ltd & ors vs Securities and Exchange Board of India & anr).</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">The import of the court’s judgement lies elsewhere.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">India is passing through a difficult phase in its history. The government of the day is embroiled in scandals involving huge sums of money. From the 2G spectrum allocation case to the coal block allotment issue, among others, the government’s actions have fuelled cronyism in a manner not seen before since independence.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In such conditions, companies involved in dubious deals and officials and politicians who have much to hide have been provided a legal roof to stymie freedom of journalists to report without fear. While the court has passed a very reasonable order, its institutionalization of postponement of reporting court proceedings as a “neutralizing device”, has wider implications. As it is, it is difficult to report on companies that do not report in a transparent manner. After this judgement, such companies will be emboldened to approach the higher courts for restraints on the Press. In fact, it will be unusual if they don’t do so.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">While the court prescribed tests of reasonableness, among others, on deciding issues of postponement, time is of the essence for media and citizens dependent on it for information. It is not far-fetched to presume that during this period of stasis, reporters and editors, can be arm-twisted into submission. The judgement whittles down an already embattled freedom available to the Press. It will add psychological pressure and uncertainty in an already difficult environment.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 16954, 'title' => 'A judgement & some worries', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -Live Mint </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>The judgement whittles down an already embattled freedom available to the Press </em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In an important judgement it delivered on Tuesday, the Supreme Court has institutionalized the power to temporarily prohibit the Press from reporting court proceedings in case it interferes with the right to a free and fair trial. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> While the court shied from prescribing guidelines for the Press on court reporting, in the same breath it allowed individuals and companies to approach higher courts for passing of orders that temporarily prohibit reporting of such proceedings. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The right to a free and fair trial is already available under the right to protection of life and personal liberty (Article 21 of the Constitution). The generalized power to pass orders to postpone reporting of court proceedings is a “neutralizing device” to give meaning to this power. This is something new to Indian jurisprudence. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court has argued that, “…anyone, be he an accused or an aggrieved person, who genuinely apprehends on the basis of the content of the publication and its effect, an infringement of his/her rights under Article 21 to a fair trial and all that it comprehends, would be entitled to approach an appropriate writ court and seek an order of postponement of the offending publication/broadcast or postponement of reporting of certain phases of the trial (including identity of the victim or the witness or the complainant), and that the court may grant such preventive relief…” (Para 43 of the judgement delivered in the case of Sahara India Real Estate Corp Ltd & ors vs Securities and Exchange Board of India & anr). </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The import of the court’s judgement lies elsewhere. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> India is passing through a difficult phase in its history. The government of the day is embroiled in scandals involving huge sums of money. From the 2G spectrum allocation case to the coal block allotment issue, among others, the government’s actions have fuelled cronyism in a manner not seen before since independence. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In such conditions, companies involved in dubious deals and officials and politicians who have much to hide have been provided a legal roof to stymie freedom of journalists to report without fear. While the court has passed a very reasonable order, its institutionalization of postponement of reporting court proceedings as a “neutralizing device”, has wider implications. As it is, it is difficult to report on companies that do not report in a transparent manner. After this judgement, such companies will be emboldened to approach the higher courts for restraints on the Press. In fact, it will be unusual if they don’t do so. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> While the court prescribed tests of reasonableness, among others, on deciding issues of postponement, time is of the essence for media and citizens dependent on it for information. It is not far-fetched to presume that during this period of stasis, reporters and editors, can be arm-twisted into submission. The judgement whittles down an already embattled freedom available to the Press. It will add psychological pressure and uncertainty in an already difficult environment. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Live Mint, 11 September, 2012, http://www.livemint.com/Opinion/NdW9rzJAFGv1LxDd5xMQmI/A-judgement--some-worries.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'a-judgement-some-worries-17082', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17082, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 16954, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | A judgement & some worries', 'metaKeywords' => 'media,Freedom of Speech,Law and Justice', 'metaDesc' => ' -Live Mint The judgement whittles down an already embattled freedom available to the Press In an important judgement it delivered on Tuesday, the Supreme Court has institutionalized the power to temporarily prohibit the Press from reporting court proceedings in case it interferes...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-Live Mint</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>The judgement whittles down an already embattled freedom available to the Press </em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In an important judgement it delivered on Tuesday, the Supreme Court has institutionalized the power to temporarily prohibit the Press from reporting court proceedings in case it interferes with the right to a free and fair trial.</div><div style="text-align: justify">While the court shied from prescribing guidelines for the Press on court reporting, in the same breath it allowed individuals and companies to approach higher courts for passing of orders that temporarily prohibit reporting of such proceedings.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The right to a free and fair trial is already available under the right to protection of life and personal liberty (Article 21 of the Constitution). The generalized power to pass orders to postpone reporting of court proceedings is a “neutralizing device” to give meaning to this power. This is something new to Indian jurisprudence.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court has argued that, “…anyone, be he an accused or an aggrieved person, who genuinely apprehends on the basis of the content of the publication and its effect, an infringement of his/her rights under Article 21 to a fair trial and all that it comprehends, would be entitled to approach an appropriate writ court and seek an order of postponement of the offending publication/broadcast or postponement of reporting of certain phases of the trial (including identity of the victim or the witness or the complainant), and that the court may grant such preventive relief…” (Para 43 of the judgement delivered in the case of Sahara India Real Estate Corp Ltd & ors vs Securities and Exchange Board of India & anr).</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">The import of the court’s judgement lies elsewhere.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">India is passing through a difficult phase in its history. The government of the day is embroiled in scandals involving huge sums of money. From the 2G spectrum allocation case to the coal block allotment issue, among others, the government’s actions have fuelled cronyism in a manner not seen before since independence.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In such conditions, companies involved in dubious deals and officials and politicians who have much to hide have been provided a legal roof to stymie freedom of journalists to report without fear. While the court has passed a very reasonable order, its institutionalization of postponement of reporting court proceedings as a “neutralizing device”, has wider implications. As it is, it is difficult to report on companies that do not report in a transparent manner. After this judgement, such companies will be emboldened to approach the higher courts for restraints on the Press. In fact, it will be unusual if they don’t do so.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">While the court prescribed tests of reasonableness, among others, on deciding issues of postponement, time is of the essence for media and citizens dependent on it for information. It is not far-fetched to presume that during this period of stasis, reporters and editors, can be arm-twisted into submission. The judgement whittles down an already embattled freedom available to the Press. It will add psychological pressure and uncertainty in an already difficult environment.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 16954, 'title' => 'A judgement & some worries', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -Live Mint </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>The judgement whittles down an already embattled freedom available to the Press </em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In an important judgement it delivered on Tuesday, the Supreme Court has institutionalized the power to temporarily prohibit the Press from reporting court proceedings in case it interferes with the right to a free and fair trial. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> While the court shied from prescribing guidelines for the Press on court reporting, in the same breath it allowed individuals and companies to approach higher courts for passing of orders that temporarily prohibit reporting of such proceedings. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The right to a free and fair trial is already available under the right to protection of life and personal liberty (Article 21 of the Constitution). The generalized power to pass orders to postpone reporting of court proceedings is a “neutralizing device” to give meaning to this power. This is something new to Indian jurisprudence. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court has argued that, “…anyone, be he an accused or an aggrieved person, who genuinely apprehends on the basis of the content of the publication and its effect, an infringement of his/her rights under Article 21 to a fair trial and all that it comprehends, would be entitled to approach an appropriate writ court and seek an order of postponement of the offending publication/broadcast or postponement of reporting of certain phases of the trial (including identity of the victim or the witness or the complainant), and that the court may grant such preventive relief…” (Para 43 of the judgement delivered in the case of Sahara India Real Estate Corp Ltd & ors vs Securities and Exchange Board of India & anr). </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The import of the court’s judgement lies elsewhere. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> India is passing through a difficult phase in its history. The government of the day is embroiled in scandals involving huge sums of money. From the 2G spectrum allocation case to the coal block allotment issue, among others, the government’s actions have fuelled cronyism in a manner not seen before since independence. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> In such conditions, companies involved in dubious deals and officials and politicians who have much to hide have been provided a legal roof to stymie freedom of journalists to report without fear. While the court has passed a very reasonable order, its institutionalization of postponement of reporting court proceedings as a “neutralizing device”, has wider implications. As it is, it is difficult to report on companies that do not report in a transparent manner. After this judgement, such companies will be emboldened to approach the higher courts for restraints on the Press. In fact, it will be unusual if they don’t do so. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> While the court prescribed tests of reasonableness, among others, on deciding issues of postponement, time is of the essence for media and citizens dependent on it for information. It is not far-fetched to presume that during this period of stasis, reporters and editors, can be arm-twisted into submission. The judgement whittles down an already embattled freedom available to the Press. It will add psychological pressure and uncertainty in an already difficult environment. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Live Mint, 11 September, 2012, http://www.livemint.com/Opinion/NdW9rzJAFGv1LxDd5xMQmI/A-judgement--some-worries.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'a-judgement-some-worries-17082', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17082, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 16954 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | A judgement & some worries' $metaKeywords = 'media,Freedom of Speech,Law and Justice' $metaDesc = ' -Live Mint The judgement whittles down an already embattled freedom available to the Press In an important judgement it delivered on Tuesday, the Supreme Court has institutionalized the power to temporarily prohibit the Press from reporting court proceedings in case it interferes...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-Live Mint</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>The judgement whittles down an already embattled freedom available to the Press </em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In an important judgement it delivered on Tuesday, the Supreme Court has institutionalized the power to temporarily prohibit the Press from reporting court proceedings in case it interferes with the right to a free and fair trial.</div><div style="text-align: justify">While the court shied from prescribing guidelines for the Press on court reporting, in the same breath it allowed individuals and companies to approach higher courts for passing of orders that temporarily prohibit reporting of such proceedings.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The right to a free and fair trial is already available under the right to protection of life and personal liberty (Article 21 of the Constitution). The generalized power to pass orders to postpone reporting of court proceedings is a “neutralizing device” to give meaning to this power. This is something new to Indian jurisprudence.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court has argued that, “…anyone, be he an accused or an aggrieved person, who genuinely apprehends on the basis of the content of the publication and its effect, an infringement of his/her rights under Article 21 to a fair trial and all that it comprehends, would be entitled to approach an appropriate writ court and seek an order of postponement of the offending publication/broadcast or postponement of reporting of certain phases of the trial (including identity of the victim or the witness or the complainant), and that the court may grant such preventive relief…” (Para 43 of the judgement delivered in the case of Sahara India Real Estate Corp Ltd & ors vs Securities and Exchange Board of India & anr).</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify">The import of the court’s judgement lies elsewhere.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">India is passing through a difficult phase in its history. The government of the day is embroiled in scandals involving huge sums of money. From the 2G spectrum allocation case to the coal block allotment issue, among others, the government’s actions have fuelled cronyism in a manner not seen before since independence.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">In such conditions, companies involved in dubious deals and officials and politicians who have much to hide have been provided a legal roof to stymie freedom of journalists to report without fear. While the court has passed a very reasonable order, its institutionalization of postponement of reporting court proceedings as a “neutralizing device”, has wider implications. As it is, it is difficult to report on companies that do not report in a transparent manner. After this judgement, such companies will be emboldened to approach the higher courts for restraints on the Press. In fact, it will be unusual if they don’t do so.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">While the court prescribed tests of reasonableness, among others, on deciding issues of postponement, time is of the essence for media and citizens dependent on it for information. It is not far-fetched to presume that during this period of stasis, reporters and editors, can be arm-twisted into submission. The judgement whittles down an already embattled freedom available to the Press. It will add psychological pressure and uncertainty in an already difficult environment.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
A judgement & some worries |
-Live Mint The judgement whittles down an already embattled freedom available to the Press In an important judgement it delivered on Tuesday, the Supreme Court has institutionalized the power to temporarily prohibit the Press from reporting court proceedings in case it interferes with the right to a free and fair trial. While the court shied from prescribing guidelines for the Press on court reporting, in the same breath it allowed individuals and companies to approach higher courts for passing of orders that temporarily prohibit reporting of such proceedings. The right to a free and fair trial is already available under the right to protection of life and personal liberty (Article 21 of the Constitution). The generalized power to pass orders to postpone reporting of court proceedings is a “neutralizing device” to give meaning to this power. This is something new to Indian jurisprudence. The court has argued that, “…anyone, be he an accused or an aggrieved person, who genuinely apprehends on the basis of the content of the publication and its effect, an infringement of his/her rights under Article 21 to a fair trial and all that it comprehends, would be entitled to approach an appropriate writ court and seek an order of postponement of the offending publication/broadcast or postponement of reporting of certain phases of the trial (including identity of the victim or the witness or the complainant), and that the court may grant such preventive relief…” (Para 43 of the judgement delivered in the case of Sahara India Real Estate Corp Ltd & ors vs Securities and Exchange Board of India & anr). The import of the court’s judgement lies elsewhere. India is passing through a difficult phase in its history. The government of the day is embroiled in scandals involving huge sums of money. From the 2G spectrum allocation case to the coal block allotment issue, among others, the government’s actions have fuelled cronyism in a manner not seen before since independence. In such conditions, companies involved in dubious deals and officials and politicians who have much to hide have been provided a legal roof to stymie freedom of journalists to report without fear. While the court has passed a very reasonable order, its institutionalization of postponement of reporting court proceedings as a “neutralizing device”, has wider implications. As it is, it is difficult to report on companies that do not report in a transparent manner. After this judgement, such companies will be emboldened to approach the higher courts for restraints on the Press. In fact, it will be unusual if they don’t do so. While the court prescribed tests of reasonableness, among others, on deciding issues of postponement, time is of the essence for media and citizens dependent on it for information. It is not far-fetched to presume that during this period of stasis, reporters and editors, can be arm-twisted into submission. The judgement whittles down an already embattled freedom available to the Press. It will add psychological pressure and uncertainty in an already difficult environment. |