Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/a-lot-rests-on-aadhaar-for-govt-ruhi-tewari-22867/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/a-lot-rests-on-aadhaar-for-govt-ruhi-tewari-22867/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/a-lot-rests-on-aadhaar-for-govt-ruhi-tewari-22867/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/a-lot-rests-on-aadhaar-for-govt-ruhi-tewari-22867/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f7228949423-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f7228949423-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f7228949423-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f7228949423-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f7228949423-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f7228949423-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f7228949423-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f7228949423-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f7228949423-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 22713, 'title' => 'A lot rests on Aadhaar for govt -Ruhi Tewari', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Indian Express </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> The Supreme Court order restricting authorities from denying a benefit or service to any citizen of India for not having an Aadhaar card has put the Congress-led government, which had made Aadhaar the basis of its ambitious and overarching Direct Benefits Transfer (DBT) scheme, in a tight spot. </p> <p align="justify"> The idea behind linking DBT - which aims at eliminating middlemen and plugging leakages in schemes - to Aadhaar was sound, the prime objective being to eliminate duplication as well as ghost beneficiaries. However, the problem was that the government, perhaps driven by electoral considerations, squeezed in too much, too soon. Aadhaar was made the basis of this fairly complex scheme at a time when it was itself in its nascent stages, when Aadhaar enrollment rates were low and seeding with bank accounts poor. </p> <p align="justify"> Thus, linking a new, little-understood scheme to Aadhaar - whose need was still being debated - led to absolute confusion. To add to it, the government expanded the Aadhaar-linked DBT scheme to 121 districts in July. </p> <p align="justify"> Compounding the problem further was the ambiguity of the government's approach. It maintained Aadhaar was not mandatory but subtly conveyed that citizens had no option but to get themselves enrolled. In Delhi for instance, an Aadhaar number is needed to register marriages, property or even to obtain income certificates. In villages, people have been told they won't get anything - work under the MGNREGA, rations, or school admissions - without Aadhaar. </p> <p align="justify"> At a larger level, the government started making more schemes dependent on Aadhaar by bringing them under the DBT net. Thus, people had to get themselves enrolled if they wanted the cash subsidy for kerosene in some districts; or if they wanted their pensions and scholarships directly in bank accounts. Now LPG subsidy is set to be brought under DBT in 289 districts by the beginning of next year. </p> <p align="justify"> The apex court's order, meanwhile, has put the government on a sticky wicket. It had envisioned the implementation of the DBT - which it hoped would be its electoral trump card - on the basis of Aadhaar-linked bank accounts. It would be difficult for the government to go back on the plan now, but it would be equally tricky to blatantly insist on Aadhaar to be eligible for benefits under the DBT. </p> <p align="justify"> With barely any time left for polls, it faces an arduous task. </p> <p align="justify"> <em>Ruhi is a special correspondent based in Delhi </em> </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 1 October, 2013, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/a-lot-rests-on-aadhaar-for-govt/1176553/0', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'a-lot-rests-on-aadhaar-for-govt-ruhi-tewari-22867', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 22867, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 22713, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | A lot rests on Aadhaar for govt -Ruhi Tewari', 'metaKeywords' => 'aadhaar,uid,UIDAI,Direct Benefit Transfer', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Indian Express The Supreme Court order restricting authorities from denying a benefit or service to any citizen of India for not having an Aadhaar card has put the Congress-led government, which had made Aadhaar the basis of its ambitious and...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Indian Express</div><p align="justify"><br />The Supreme Court order restricting authorities from denying a benefit or service to any citizen of India for not having an Aadhaar card has put the Congress-led government, which had made Aadhaar the basis of its ambitious and overarching Direct Benefits Transfer (DBT) scheme, in a tight spot.</p><p align="justify">The idea behind linking DBT - which aims at eliminating middlemen and plugging leakages in schemes - to Aadhaar was sound, the prime objective being to eliminate duplication as well as ghost beneficiaries. However, the problem was that the government, perhaps driven by electoral considerations, squeezed in too much, too soon. Aadhaar was made the basis of this fairly complex scheme at a time when it was itself in its nascent stages, when Aadhaar enrollment rates were low and seeding with bank accounts poor.</p><p align="justify">Thus, linking a new, little-understood scheme to Aadhaar - whose need was still being debated - led to absolute confusion. To add to it, the government expanded the Aadhaar-linked DBT scheme to 121 districts in July.</p><p align="justify">Compounding the problem further was the ambiguity of the government's approach. It maintained Aadhaar was not mandatory but subtly conveyed that citizens had no option but to get themselves enrolled. In Delhi for instance, an Aadhaar number is needed to register marriages, property or even to obtain income certificates. In villages, people have been told they won't get anything - work under the MGNREGA, rations, or school admissions - without Aadhaar.</p><p align="justify">At a larger level, the government started making more schemes dependent on Aadhaar by bringing them under the DBT net. Thus, people had to get themselves enrolled if they wanted the cash subsidy for kerosene in some districts; or if they wanted their pensions and scholarships directly in bank accounts. Now LPG subsidy is set to be brought under DBT in 289 districts by the beginning of next year.</p><p align="justify">The apex court's order, meanwhile, has put the government on a sticky wicket. It had envisioned the implementation of the DBT - which it hoped would be its electoral trump card - on the basis of Aadhaar-linked bank accounts. It would be difficult for the government to go back on the plan now, but it would be equally tricky to blatantly insist on Aadhaar to be eligible for benefits under the DBT.</p><p align="justify">With barely any time left for polls, it faces an arduous task.</p><p align="justify"><em>Ruhi is a special correspondent based in Delhi </em></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 22713, 'title' => 'A lot rests on Aadhaar for govt -Ruhi Tewari', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Indian Express </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> The Supreme Court order restricting authorities from denying a benefit or service to any citizen of India for not having an Aadhaar card has put the Congress-led government, which had made Aadhaar the basis of its ambitious and overarching Direct Benefits Transfer (DBT) scheme, in a tight spot. </p> <p align="justify"> The idea behind linking DBT - which aims at eliminating middlemen and plugging leakages in schemes - to Aadhaar was sound, the prime objective being to eliminate duplication as well as ghost beneficiaries. However, the problem was that the government, perhaps driven by electoral considerations, squeezed in too much, too soon. Aadhaar was made the basis of this fairly complex scheme at a time when it was itself in its nascent stages, when Aadhaar enrollment rates were low and seeding with bank accounts poor. </p> <p align="justify"> Thus, linking a new, little-understood scheme to Aadhaar - whose need was still being debated - led to absolute confusion. To add to it, the government expanded the Aadhaar-linked DBT scheme to 121 districts in July. </p> <p align="justify"> Compounding the problem further was the ambiguity of the government's approach. It maintained Aadhaar was not mandatory but subtly conveyed that citizens had no option but to get themselves enrolled. In Delhi for instance, an Aadhaar number is needed to register marriages, property or even to obtain income certificates. In villages, people have been told they won't get anything - work under the MGNREGA, rations, or school admissions - without Aadhaar. </p> <p align="justify"> At a larger level, the government started making more schemes dependent on Aadhaar by bringing them under the DBT net. Thus, people had to get themselves enrolled if they wanted the cash subsidy for kerosene in some districts; or if they wanted their pensions and scholarships directly in bank accounts. Now LPG subsidy is set to be brought under DBT in 289 districts by the beginning of next year. </p> <p align="justify"> The apex court's order, meanwhile, has put the government on a sticky wicket. It had envisioned the implementation of the DBT - which it hoped would be its electoral trump card - on the basis of Aadhaar-linked bank accounts. It would be difficult for the government to go back on the plan now, but it would be equally tricky to blatantly insist on Aadhaar to be eligible for benefits under the DBT. </p> <p align="justify"> With barely any time left for polls, it faces an arduous task. </p> <p align="justify"> <em>Ruhi is a special correspondent based in Delhi </em> </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 1 October, 2013, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/a-lot-rests-on-aadhaar-for-govt/1176553/0', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'a-lot-rests-on-aadhaar-for-govt-ruhi-tewari-22867', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 22867, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 22713 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | A lot rests on Aadhaar for govt -Ruhi Tewari' $metaKeywords = 'aadhaar,uid,UIDAI,Direct Benefit Transfer' $metaDesc = ' -The Indian Express The Supreme Court order restricting authorities from denying a benefit or service to any citizen of India for not having an Aadhaar card has put the Congress-led government, which had made Aadhaar the basis of its ambitious and...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Indian Express</div><p align="justify"><br />The Supreme Court order restricting authorities from denying a benefit or service to any citizen of India for not having an Aadhaar card has put the Congress-led government, which had made Aadhaar the basis of its ambitious and overarching Direct Benefits Transfer (DBT) scheme, in a tight spot.</p><p align="justify">The idea behind linking DBT - which aims at eliminating middlemen and plugging leakages in schemes - to Aadhaar was sound, the prime objective being to eliminate duplication as well as ghost beneficiaries. However, the problem was that the government, perhaps driven by electoral considerations, squeezed in too much, too soon. Aadhaar was made the basis of this fairly complex scheme at a time when it was itself in its nascent stages, when Aadhaar enrollment rates were low and seeding with bank accounts poor.</p><p align="justify">Thus, linking a new, little-understood scheme to Aadhaar - whose need was still being debated - led to absolute confusion. To add to it, the government expanded the Aadhaar-linked DBT scheme to 121 districts in July.</p><p align="justify">Compounding the problem further was the ambiguity of the government's approach. It maintained Aadhaar was not mandatory but subtly conveyed that citizens had no option but to get themselves enrolled. In Delhi for instance, an Aadhaar number is needed to register marriages, property or even to obtain income certificates. In villages, people have been told they won't get anything - work under the MGNREGA, rations, or school admissions - without Aadhaar.</p><p align="justify">At a larger level, the government started making more schemes dependent on Aadhaar by bringing them under the DBT net. Thus, people had to get themselves enrolled if they wanted the cash subsidy for kerosene in some districts; or if they wanted their pensions and scholarships directly in bank accounts. Now LPG subsidy is set to be brought under DBT in 289 districts by the beginning of next year.</p><p align="justify">The apex court's order, meanwhile, has put the government on a sticky wicket. It had envisioned the implementation of the DBT - which it hoped would be its electoral trump card - on the basis of Aadhaar-linked bank accounts. It would be difficult for the government to go back on the plan now, but it would be equally tricky to blatantly insist on Aadhaar to be eligible for benefits under the DBT.</p><p align="justify">With barely any time left for polls, it faces an arduous task.</p><p align="justify"><em>Ruhi is a special correspondent based in Delhi </em></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/a-lot-rests-on-aadhaar-for-govt-ruhi-tewari-22867.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | A lot rests on Aadhaar for govt -Ruhi Tewari | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Indian Express The Supreme Court order restricting authorities from denying a benefit or service to any citizen of India for not having an Aadhaar card has put the Congress-led government, which had made Aadhaar the basis of its ambitious and..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>A lot rests on Aadhaar for govt -Ruhi Tewari</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Indian Express</div><p align="justify"><br />The Supreme Court order restricting authorities from denying a benefit or service to any citizen of India for not having an Aadhaar card has put the Congress-led government, which had made Aadhaar the basis of its ambitious and overarching Direct Benefits Transfer (DBT) scheme, in a tight spot.</p><p align="justify">The idea behind linking DBT - which aims at eliminating middlemen and plugging leakages in schemes - to Aadhaar was sound, the prime objective being to eliminate duplication as well as ghost beneficiaries. However, the problem was that the government, perhaps driven by electoral considerations, squeezed in too much, too soon. Aadhaar was made the basis of this fairly complex scheme at a time when it was itself in its nascent stages, when Aadhaar enrollment rates were low and seeding with bank accounts poor.</p><p align="justify">Thus, linking a new, little-understood scheme to Aadhaar - whose need was still being debated - led to absolute confusion. To add to it, the government expanded the Aadhaar-linked DBT scheme to 121 districts in July.</p><p align="justify">Compounding the problem further was the ambiguity of the government's approach. It maintained Aadhaar was not mandatory but subtly conveyed that citizens had no option but to get themselves enrolled. In Delhi for instance, an Aadhaar number is needed to register marriages, property or even to obtain income certificates. In villages, people have been told they won't get anything - work under the MGNREGA, rations, or school admissions - without Aadhaar.</p><p align="justify">At a larger level, the government started making more schemes dependent on Aadhaar by bringing them under the DBT net. Thus, people had to get themselves enrolled if they wanted the cash subsidy for kerosene in some districts; or if they wanted their pensions and scholarships directly in bank accounts. Now LPG subsidy is set to be brought under DBT in 289 districts by the beginning of next year.</p><p align="justify">The apex court's order, meanwhile, has put the government on a sticky wicket. It had envisioned the implementation of the DBT - which it hoped would be its electoral trump card - on the basis of Aadhaar-linked bank accounts. It would be difficult for the government to go back on the plan now, but it would be equally tricky to blatantly insist on Aadhaar to be eligible for benefits under the DBT.</p><p align="justify">With barely any time left for polls, it faces an arduous task.</p><p align="justify"><em>Ruhi is a special correspondent based in Delhi </em></p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f7228949423-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f7228949423-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f7228949423-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f7228949423-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f7228949423-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f7228949423-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f7228949423-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f7228949423-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f7228949423-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 22713, 'title' => 'A lot rests on Aadhaar for govt -Ruhi Tewari', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Indian Express </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> The Supreme Court order restricting authorities from denying a benefit or service to any citizen of India for not having an Aadhaar card has put the Congress-led government, which had made Aadhaar the basis of its ambitious and overarching Direct Benefits Transfer (DBT) scheme, in a tight spot. </p> <p align="justify"> The idea behind linking DBT - which aims at eliminating middlemen and plugging leakages in schemes - to Aadhaar was sound, the prime objective being to eliminate duplication as well as ghost beneficiaries. However, the problem was that the government, perhaps driven by electoral considerations, squeezed in too much, too soon. Aadhaar was made the basis of this fairly complex scheme at a time when it was itself in its nascent stages, when Aadhaar enrollment rates were low and seeding with bank accounts poor. </p> <p align="justify"> Thus, linking a new, little-understood scheme to Aadhaar - whose need was still being debated - led to absolute confusion. To add to it, the government expanded the Aadhaar-linked DBT scheme to 121 districts in July. </p> <p align="justify"> Compounding the problem further was the ambiguity of the government's approach. It maintained Aadhaar was not mandatory but subtly conveyed that citizens had no option but to get themselves enrolled. In Delhi for instance, an Aadhaar number is needed to register marriages, property or even to obtain income certificates. In villages, people have been told they won't get anything - work under the MGNREGA, rations, or school admissions - without Aadhaar. </p> <p align="justify"> At a larger level, the government started making more schemes dependent on Aadhaar by bringing them under the DBT net. Thus, people had to get themselves enrolled if they wanted the cash subsidy for kerosene in some districts; or if they wanted their pensions and scholarships directly in bank accounts. Now LPG subsidy is set to be brought under DBT in 289 districts by the beginning of next year. </p> <p align="justify"> The apex court's order, meanwhile, has put the government on a sticky wicket. It had envisioned the implementation of the DBT - which it hoped would be its electoral trump card - on the basis of Aadhaar-linked bank accounts. It would be difficult for the government to go back on the plan now, but it would be equally tricky to blatantly insist on Aadhaar to be eligible for benefits under the DBT. </p> <p align="justify"> With barely any time left for polls, it faces an arduous task. </p> <p align="justify"> <em>Ruhi is a special correspondent based in Delhi </em> </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 1 October, 2013, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/a-lot-rests-on-aadhaar-for-govt/1176553/0', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'a-lot-rests-on-aadhaar-for-govt-ruhi-tewari-22867', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 22867, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 22713, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | A lot rests on Aadhaar for govt -Ruhi Tewari', 'metaKeywords' => 'aadhaar,uid,UIDAI,Direct Benefit Transfer', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Indian Express The Supreme Court order restricting authorities from denying a benefit or service to any citizen of India for not having an Aadhaar card has put the Congress-led government, which had made Aadhaar the basis of its ambitious and...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Indian Express</div><p align="justify"><br />The Supreme Court order restricting authorities from denying a benefit or service to any citizen of India for not having an Aadhaar card has put the Congress-led government, which had made Aadhaar the basis of its ambitious and overarching Direct Benefits Transfer (DBT) scheme, in a tight spot.</p><p align="justify">The idea behind linking DBT - which aims at eliminating middlemen and plugging leakages in schemes - to Aadhaar was sound, the prime objective being to eliminate duplication as well as ghost beneficiaries. However, the problem was that the government, perhaps driven by electoral considerations, squeezed in too much, too soon. Aadhaar was made the basis of this fairly complex scheme at a time when it was itself in its nascent stages, when Aadhaar enrollment rates were low and seeding with bank accounts poor.</p><p align="justify">Thus, linking a new, little-understood scheme to Aadhaar - whose need was still being debated - led to absolute confusion. To add to it, the government expanded the Aadhaar-linked DBT scheme to 121 districts in July.</p><p align="justify">Compounding the problem further was the ambiguity of the government's approach. It maintained Aadhaar was not mandatory but subtly conveyed that citizens had no option but to get themselves enrolled. In Delhi for instance, an Aadhaar number is needed to register marriages, property or even to obtain income certificates. In villages, people have been told they won't get anything - work under the MGNREGA, rations, or school admissions - without Aadhaar.</p><p align="justify">At a larger level, the government started making more schemes dependent on Aadhaar by bringing them under the DBT net. Thus, people had to get themselves enrolled if they wanted the cash subsidy for kerosene in some districts; or if they wanted their pensions and scholarships directly in bank accounts. Now LPG subsidy is set to be brought under DBT in 289 districts by the beginning of next year.</p><p align="justify">The apex court's order, meanwhile, has put the government on a sticky wicket. It had envisioned the implementation of the DBT - which it hoped would be its electoral trump card - on the basis of Aadhaar-linked bank accounts. It would be difficult for the government to go back on the plan now, but it would be equally tricky to blatantly insist on Aadhaar to be eligible for benefits under the DBT.</p><p align="justify">With barely any time left for polls, it faces an arduous task.</p><p align="justify"><em>Ruhi is a special correspondent based in Delhi </em></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 22713, 'title' => 'A lot rests on Aadhaar for govt -Ruhi Tewari', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Indian Express </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> The Supreme Court order restricting authorities from denying a benefit or service to any citizen of India for not having an Aadhaar card has put the Congress-led government, which had made Aadhaar the basis of its ambitious and overarching Direct Benefits Transfer (DBT) scheme, in a tight spot. </p> <p align="justify"> The idea behind linking DBT - which aims at eliminating middlemen and plugging leakages in schemes - to Aadhaar was sound, the prime objective being to eliminate duplication as well as ghost beneficiaries. However, the problem was that the government, perhaps driven by electoral considerations, squeezed in too much, too soon. Aadhaar was made the basis of this fairly complex scheme at a time when it was itself in its nascent stages, when Aadhaar enrollment rates were low and seeding with bank accounts poor. </p> <p align="justify"> Thus, linking a new, little-understood scheme to Aadhaar - whose need was still being debated - led to absolute confusion. To add to it, the government expanded the Aadhaar-linked DBT scheme to 121 districts in July. </p> <p align="justify"> Compounding the problem further was the ambiguity of the government's approach. It maintained Aadhaar was not mandatory but subtly conveyed that citizens had no option but to get themselves enrolled. In Delhi for instance, an Aadhaar number is needed to register marriages, property or even to obtain income certificates. In villages, people have been told they won't get anything - work under the MGNREGA, rations, or school admissions - without Aadhaar. </p> <p align="justify"> At a larger level, the government started making more schemes dependent on Aadhaar by bringing them under the DBT net. Thus, people had to get themselves enrolled if they wanted the cash subsidy for kerosene in some districts; or if they wanted their pensions and scholarships directly in bank accounts. Now LPG subsidy is set to be brought under DBT in 289 districts by the beginning of next year. </p> <p align="justify"> The apex court's order, meanwhile, has put the government on a sticky wicket. It had envisioned the implementation of the DBT - which it hoped would be its electoral trump card - on the basis of Aadhaar-linked bank accounts. It would be difficult for the government to go back on the plan now, but it would be equally tricky to blatantly insist on Aadhaar to be eligible for benefits under the DBT. </p> <p align="justify"> With barely any time left for polls, it faces an arduous task. </p> <p align="justify"> <em>Ruhi is a special correspondent based in Delhi </em> </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 1 October, 2013, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/a-lot-rests-on-aadhaar-for-govt/1176553/0', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'a-lot-rests-on-aadhaar-for-govt-ruhi-tewari-22867', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 22867, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 22713 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | A lot rests on Aadhaar for govt -Ruhi Tewari' $metaKeywords = 'aadhaar,uid,UIDAI,Direct Benefit Transfer' $metaDesc = ' -The Indian Express The Supreme Court order restricting authorities from denying a benefit or service to any citizen of India for not having an Aadhaar card has put the Congress-led government, which had made Aadhaar the basis of its ambitious and...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Indian Express</div><p align="justify"><br />The Supreme Court order restricting authorities from denying a benefit or service to any citizen of India for not having an Aadhaar card has put the Congress-led government, which had made Aadhaar the basis of its ambitious and overarching Direct Benefits Transfer (DBT) scheme, in a tight spot.</p><p align="justify">The idea behind linking DBT - which aims at eliminating middlemen and plugging leakages in schemes - to Aadhaar was sound, the prime objective being to eliminate duplication as well as ghost beneficiaries. However, the problem was that the government, perhaps driven by electoral considerations, squeezed in too much, too soon. Aadhaar was made the basis of this fairly complex scheme at a time when it was itself in its nascent stages, when Aadhaar enrollment rates were low and seeding with bank accounts poor.</p><p align="justify">Thus, linking a new, little-understood scheme to Aadhaar - whose need was still being debated - led to absolute confusion. To add to it, the government expanded the Aadhaar-linked DBT scheme to 121 districts in July.</p><p align="justify">Compounding the problem further was the ambiguity of the government's approach. It maintained Aadhaar was not mandatory but subtly conveyed that citizens had no option but to get themselves enrolled. In Delhi for instance, an Aadhaar number is needed to register marriages, property or even to obtain income certificates. In villages, people have been told they won't get anything - work under the MGNREGA, rations, or school admissions - without Aadhaar.</p><p align="justify">At a larger level, the government started making more schemes dependent on Aadhaar by bringing them under the DBT net. Thus, people had to get themselves enrolled if they wanted the cash subsidy for kerosene in some districts; or if they wanted their pensions and scholarships directly in bank accounts. Now LPG subsidy is set to be brought under DBT in 289 districts by the beginning of next year.</p><p align="justify">The apex court's order, meanwhile, has put the government on a sticky wicket. It had envisioned the implementation of the DBT - which it hoped would be its electoral trump card - on the basis of Aadhaar-linked bank accounts. It would be difficult for the government to go back on the plan now, but it would be equally tricky to blatantly insist on Aadhaar to be eligible for benefits under the DBT.</p><p align="justify">With barely any time left for polls, it faces an arduous task.</p><p align="justify"><em>Ruhi is a special correspondent based in Delhi </em></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/a-lot-rests-on-aadhaar-for-govt-ruhi-tewari-22867.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | A lot rests on Aadhaar for govt -Ruhi Tewari | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Indian Express The Supreme Court order restricting authorities from denying a benefit or service to any citizen of India for not having an Aadhaar card has put the Congress-led government, which had made Aadhaar the basis of its ambitious and..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>A lot rests on Aadhaar for govt -Ruhi Tewari</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Indian Express</div><p align="justify"><br />The Supreme Court order restricting authorities from denying a benefit or service to any citizen of India for not having an Aadhaar card has put the Congress-led government, which had made Aadhaar the basis of its ambitious and overarching Direct Benefits Transfer (DBT) scheme, in a tight spot.</p><p align="justify">The idea behind linking DBT - which aims at eliminating middlemen and plugging leakages in schemes - to Aadhaar was sound, the prime objective being to eliminate duplication as well as ghost beneficiaries. However, the problem was that the government, perhaps driven by electoral considerations, squeezed in too much, too soon. Aadhaar was made the basis of this fairly complex scheme at a time when it was itself in its nascent stages, when Aadhaar enrollment rates were low and seeding with bank accounts poor.</p><p align="justify">Thus, linking a new, little-understood scheme to Aadhaar - whose need was still being debated - led to absolute confusion. To add to it, the government expanded the Aadhaar-linked DBT scheme to 121 districts in July.</p><p align="justify">Compounding the problem further was the ambiguity of the government's approach. It maintained Aadhaar was not mandatory but subtly conveyed that citizens had no option but to get themselves enrolled. In Delhi for instance, an Aadhaar number is needed to register marriages, property or even to obtain income certificates. In villages, people have been told they won't get anything - work under the MGNREGA, rations, or school admissions - without Aadhaar.</p><p align="justify">At a larger level, the government started making more schemes dependent on Aadhaar by bringing them under the DBT net. Thus, people had to get themselves enrolled if they wanted the cash subsidy for kerosene in some districts; or if they wanted their pensions and scholarships directly in bank accounts. Now LPG subsidy is set to be brought under DBT in 289 districts by the beginning of next year.</p><p align="justify">The apex court's order, meanwhile, has put the government on a sticky wicket. It had envisioned the implementation of the DBT - which it hoped would be its electoral trump card - on the basis of Aadhaar-linked bank accounts. It would be difficult for the government to go back on the plan now, but it would be equally tricky to blatantly insist on Aadhaar to be eligible for benefits under the DBT.</p><p align="justify">With barely any time left for polls, it faces an arduous task.</p><p align="justify"><em>Ruhi is a special correspondent based in Delhi </em></p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f7228949423-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f7228949423-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f7228949423-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f7228949423-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f7228949423-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f7228949423-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f7228949423-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f7228949423-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f7228949423-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 22713, 'title' => 'A lot rests on Aadhaar for govt -Ruhi Tewari', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Indian Express </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> The Supreme Court order restricting authorities from denying a benefit or service to any citizen of India for not having an Aadhaar card has put the Congress-led government, which had made Aadhaar the basis of its ambitious and overarching Direct Benefits Transfer (DBT) scheme, in a tight spot. </p> <p align="justify"> The idea behind linking DBT - which aims at eliminating middlemen and plugging leakages in schemes - to Aadhaar was sound, the prime objective being to eliminate duplication as well as ghost beneficiaries. However, the problem was that the government, perhaps driven by electoral considerations, squeezed in too much, too soon. Aadhaar was made the basis of this fairly complex scheme at a time when it was itself in its nascent stages, when Aadhaar enrollment rates were low and seeding with bank accounts poor. </p> <p align="justify"> Thus, linking a new, little-understood scheme to Aadhaar - whose need was still being debated - led to absolute confusion. To add to it, the government expanded the Aadhaar-linked DBT scheme to 121 districts in July. </p> <p align="justify"> Compounding the problem further was the ambiguity of the government's approach. It maintained Aadhaar was not mandatory but subtly conveyed that citizens had no option but to get themselves enrolled. In Delhi for instance, an Aadhaar number is needed to register marriages, property or even to obtain income certificates. In villages, people have been told they won't get anything - work under the MGNREGA, rations, or school admissions - without Aadhaar. </p> <p align="justify"> At a larger level, the government started making more schemes dependent on Aadhaar by bringing them under the DBT net. Thus, people had to get themselves enrolled if they wanted the cash subsidy for kerosene in some districts; or if they wanted their pensions and scholarships directly in bank accounts. Now LPG subsidy is set to be brought under DBT in 289 districts by the beginning of next year. </p> <p align="justify"> The apex court's order, meanwhile, has put the government on a sticky wicket. It had envisioned the implementation of the DBT - which it hoped would be its electoral trump card - on the basis of Aadhaar-linked bank accounts. It would be difficult for the government to go back on the plan now, but it would be equally tricky to blatantly insist on Aadhaar to be eligible for benefits under the DBT. </p> <p align="justify"> With barely any time left for polls, it faces an arduous task. </p> <p align="justify"> <em>Ruhi is a special correspondent based in Delhi </em> </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 1 October, 2013, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/a-lot-rests-on-aadhaar-for-govt/1176553/0', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'a-lot-rests-on-aadhaar-for-govt-ruhi-tewari-22867', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 22867, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 22713, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | A lot rests on Aadhaar for govt -Ruhi Tewari', 'metaKeywords' => 'aadhaar,uid,UIDAI,Direct Benefit Transfer', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Indian Express The Supreme Court order restricting authorities from denying a benefit or service to any citizen of India for not having an Aadhaar card has put the Congress-led government, which had made Aadhaar the basis of its ambitious and...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Indian Express</div><p align="justify"><br />The Supreme Court order restricting authorities from denying a benefit or service to any citizen of India for not having an Aadhaar card has put the Congress-led government, which had made Aadhaar the basis of its ambitious and overarching Direct Benefits Transfer (DBT) scheme, in a tight spot.</p><p align="justify">The idea behind linking DBT - which aims at eliminating middlemen and plugging leakages in schemes - to Aadhaar was sound, the prime objective being to eliminate duplication as well as ghost beneficiaries. However, the problem was that the government, perhaps driven by electoral considerations, squeezed in too much, too soon. Aadhaar was made the basis of this fairly complex scheme at a time when it was itself in its nascent stages, when Aadhaar enrollment rates were low and seeding with bank accounts poor.</p><p align="justify">Thus, linking a new, little-understood scheme to Aadhaar - whose need was still being debated - led to absolute confusion. To add to it, the government expanded the Aadhaar-linked DBT scheme to 121 districts in July.</p><p align="justify">Compounding the problem further was the ambiguity of the government's approach. It maintained Aadhaar was not mandatory but subtly conveyed that citizens had no option but to get themselves enrolled. In Delhi for instance, an Aadhaar number is needed to register marriages, property or even to obtain income certificates. In villages, people have been told they won't get anything - work under the MGNREGA, rations, or school admissions - without Aadhaar.</p><p align="justify">At a larger level, the government started making more schemes dependent on Aadhaar by bringing them under the DBT net. Thus, people had to get themselves enrolled if they wanted the cash subsidy for kerosene in some districts; or if they wanted their pensions and scholarships directly in bank accounts. Now LPG subsidy is set to be brought under DBT in 289 districts by the beginning of next year.</p><p align="justify">The apex court's order, meanwhile, has put the government on a sticky wicket. It had envisioned the implementation of the DBT - which it hoped would be its electoral trump card - on the basis of Aadhaar-linked bank accounts. It would be difficult for the government to go back on the plan now, but it would be equally tricky to blatantly insist on Aadhaar to be eligible for benefits under the DBT.</p><p align="justify">With barely any time left for polls, it faces an arduous task.</p><p align="justify"><em>Ruhi is a special correspondent based in Delhi </em></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 22713, 'title' => 'A lot rests on Aadhaar for govt -Ruhi Tewari', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Indian Express </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> The Supreme Court order restricting authorities from denying a benefit or service to any citizen of India for not having an Aadhaar card has put the Congress-led government, which had made Aadhaar the basis of its ambitious and overarching Direct Benefits Transfer (DBT) scheme, in a tight spot. </p> <p align="justify"> The idea behind linking DBT - which aims at eliminating middlemen and plugging leakages in schemes - to Aadhaar was sound, the prime objective being to eliminate duplication as well as ghost beneficiaries. However, the problem was that the government, perhaps driven by electoral considerations, squeezed in too much, too soon. Aadhaar was made the basis of this fairly complex scheme at a time when it was itself in its nascent stages, when Aadhaar enrollment rates were low and seeding with bank accounts poor. </p> <p align="justify"> Thus, linking a new, little-understood scheme to Aadhaar - whose need was still being debated - led to absolute confusion. To add to it, the government expanded the Aadhaar-linked DBT scheme to 121 districts in July. </p> <p align="justify"> Compounding the problem further was the ambiguity of the government's approach. It maintained Aadhaar was not mandatory but subtly conveyed that citizens had no option but to get themselves enrolled. In Delhi for instance, an Aadhaar number is needed to register marriages, property or even to obtain income certificates. In villages, people have been told they won't get anything - work under the MGNREGA, rations, or school admissions - without Aadhaar. </p> <p align="justify"> At a larger level, the government started making more schemes dependent on Aadhaar by bringing them under the DBT net. Thus, people had to get themselves enrolled if they wanted the cash subsidy for kerosene in some districts; or if they wanted their pensions and scholarships directly in bank accounts. Now LPG subsidy is set to be brought under DBT in 289 districts by the beginning of next year. </p> <p align="justify"> The apex court's order, meanwhile, has put the government on a sticky wicket. It had envisioned the implementation of the DBT - which it hoped would be its electoral trump card - on the basis of Aadhaar-linked bank accounts. It would be difficult for the government to go back on the plan now, but it would be equally tricky to blatantly insist on Aadhaar to be eligible for benefits under the DBT. </p> <p align="justify"> With barely any time left for polls, it faces an arduous task. </p> <p align="justify"> <em>Ruhi is a special correspondent based in Delhi </em> </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 1 October, 2013, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/a-lot-rests-on-aadhaar-for-govt/1176553/0', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'a-lot-rests-on-aadhaar-for-govt-ruhi-tewari-22867', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 22867, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 22713 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | A lot rests on Aadhaar for govt -Ruhi Tewari' $metaKeywords = 'aadhaar,uid,UIDAI,Direct Benefit Transfer' $metaDesc = ' -The Indian Express The Supreme Court order restricting authorities from denying a benefit or service to any citizen of India for not having an Aadhaar card has put the Congress-led government, which had made Aadhaar the basis of its ambitious and...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Indian Express</div><p align="justify"><br />The Supreme Court order restricting authorities from denying a benefit or service to any citizen of India for not having an Aadhaar card has put the Congress-led government, which had made Aadhaar the basis of its ambitious and overarching Direct Benefits Transfer (DBT) scheme, in a tight spot.</p><p align="justify">The idea behind linking DBT - which aims at eliminating middlemen and plugging leakages in schemes - to Aadhaar was sound, the prime objective being to eliminate duplication as well as ghost beneficiaries. However, the problem was that the government, perhaps driven by electoral considerations, squeezed in too much, too soon. Aadhaar was made the basis of this fairly complex scheme at a time when it was itself in its nascent stages, when Aadhaar enrollment rates were low and seeding with bank accounts poor.</p><p align="justify">Thus, linking a new, little-understood scheme to Aadhaar - whose need was still being debated - led to absolute confusion. To add to it, the government expanded the Aadhaar-linked DBT scheme to 121 districts in July.</p><p align="justify">Compounding the problem further was the ambiguity of the government's approach. It maintained Aadhaar was not mandatory but subtly conveyed that citizens had no option but to get themselves enrolled. In Delhi for instance, an Aadhaar number is needed to register marriages, property or even to obtain income certificates. In villages, people have been told they won't get anything - work under the MGNREGA, rations, or school admissions - without Aadhaar.</p><p align="justify">At a larger level, the government started making more schemes dependent on Aadhaar by bringing them under the DBT net. Thus, people had to get themselves enrolled if they wanted the cash subsidy for kerosene in some districts; or if they wanted their pensions and scholarships directly in bank accounts. Now LPG subsidy is set to be brought under DBT in 289 districts by the beginning of next year.</p><p align="justify">The apex court's order, meanwhile, has put the government on a sticky wicket. It had envisioned the implementation of the DBT - which it hoped would be its electoral trump card - on the basis of Aadhaar-linked bank accounts. It would be difficult for the government to go back on the plan now, but it would be equally tricky to blatantly insist on Aadhaar to be eligible for benefits under the DBT.</p><p align="justify">With barely any time left for polls, it faces an arduous task.</p><p align="justify"><em>Ruhi is a special correspondent based in Delhi </em></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/a-lot-rests-on-aadhaar-for-govt-ruhi-tewari-22867.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | A lot rests on Aadhaar for govt -Ruhi Tewari | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Indian Express The Supreme Court order restricting authorities from denying a benefit or service to any citizen of India for not having an Aadhaar card has put the Congress-led government, which had made Aadhaar the basis of its ambitious and..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>A lot rests on Aadhaar for govt -Ruhi Tewari</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Indian Express</div><p align="justify"><br />The Supreme Court order restricting authorities from denying a benefit or service to any citizen of India for not having an Aadhaar card has put the Congress-led government, which had made Aadhaar the basis of its ambitious and overarching Direct Benefits Transfer (DBT) scheme, in a tight spot.</p><p align="justify">The idea behind linking DBT - which aims at eliminating middlemen and plugging leakages in schemes - to Aadhaar was sound, the prime objective being to eliminate duplication as well as ghost beneficiaries. However, the problem was that the government, perhaps driven by electoral considerations, squeezed in too much, too soon. Aadhaar was made the basis of this fairly complex scheme at a time when it was itself in its nascent stages, when Aadhaar enrollment rates were low and seeding with bank accounts poor.</p><p align="justify">Thus, linking a new, little-understood scheme to Aadhaar - whose need was still being debated - led to absolute confusion. To add to it, the government expanded the Aadhaar-linked DBT scheme to 121 districts in July.</p><p align="justify">Compounding the problem further was the ambiguity of the government's approach. It maintained Aadhaar was not mandatory but subtly conveyed that citizens had no option but to get themselves enrolled. In Delhi for instance, an Aadhaar number is needed to register marriages, property or even to obtain income certificates. In villages, people have been told they won't get anything - work under the MGNREGA, rations, or school admissions - without Aadhaar.</p><p align="justify">At a larger level, the government started making more schemes dependent on Aadhaar by bringing them under the DBT net. Thus, people had to get themselves enrolled if they wanted the cash subsidy for kerosene in some districts; or if they wanted their pensions and scholarships directly in bank accounts. Now LPG subsidy is set to be brought under DBT in 289 districts by the beginning of next year.</p><p align="justify">The apex court's order, meanwhile, has put the government on a sticky wicket. It had envisioned the implementation of the DBT - which it hoped would be its electoral trump card - on the basis of Aadhaar-linked bank accounts. It would be difficult for the government to go back on the plan now, but it would be equally tricky to blatantly insist on Aadhaar to be eligible for benefits under the DBT.</p><p align="justify">With barely any time left for polls, it faces an arduous task.</p><p align="justify"><em>Ruhi is a special correspondent based in Delhi </em></p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 22713, 'title' => 'A lot rests on Aadhaar for govt -Ruhi Tewari', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Indian Express </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> The Supreme Court order restricting authorities from denying a benefit or service to any citizen of India for not having an Aadhaar card has put the Congress-led government, which had made Aadhaar the basis of its ambitious and overarching Direct Benefits Transfer (DBT) scheme, in a tight spot. </p> <p align="justify"> The idea behind linking DBT - which aims at eliminating middlemen and plugging leakages in schemes - to Aadhaar was sound, the prime objective being to eliminate duplication as well as ghost beneficiaries. However, the problem was that the government, perhaps driven by electoral considerations, squeezed in too much, too soon. Aadhaar was made the basis of this fairly complex scheme at a time when it was itself in its nascent stages, when Aadhaar enrollment rates were low and seeding with bank accounts poor. </p> <p align="justify"> Thus, linking a new, little-understood scheme to Aadhaar - whose need was still being debated - led to absolute confusion. To add to it, the government expanded the Aadhaar-linked DBT scheme to 121 districts in July. </p> <p align="justify"> Compounding the problem further was the ambiguity of the government's approach. It maintained Aadhaar was not mandatory but subtly conveyed that citizens had no option but to get themselves enrolled. In Delhi for instance, an Aadhaar number is needed to register marriages, property or even to obtain income certificates. In villages, people have been told they won't get anything - work under the MGNREGA, rations, or school admissions - without Aadhaar. </p> <p align="justify"> At a larger level, the government started making more schemes dependent on Aadhaar by bringing them under the DBT net. Thus, people had to get themselves enrolled if they wanted the cash subsidy for kerosene in some districts; or if they wanted their pensions and scholarships directly in bank accounts. Now LPG subsidy is set to be brought under DBT in 289 districts by the beginning of next year. </p> <p align="justify"> The apex court's order, meanwhile, has put the government on a sticky wicket. It had envisioned the implementation of the DBT - which it hoped would be its electoral trump card - on the basis of Aadhaar-linked bank accounts. It would be difficult for the government to go back on the plan now, but it would be equally tricky to blatantly insist on Aadhaar to be eligible for benefits under the DBT. </p> <p align="justify"> With barely any time left for polls, it faces an arduous task. </p> <p align="justify"> <em>Ruhi is a special correspondent based in Delhi </em> </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 1 October, 2013, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/a-lot-rests-on-aadhaar-for-govt/1176553/0', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'a-lot-rests-on-aadhaar-for-govt-ruhi-tewari-22867', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 22867, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 22713, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | A lot rests on Aadhaar for govt -Ruhi Tewari', 'metaKeywords' => 'aadhaar,uid,UIDAI,Direct Benefit Transfer', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Indian Express The Supreme Court order restricting authorities from denying a benefit or service to any citizen of India for not having an Aadhaar card has put the Congress-led government, which had made Aadhaar the basis of its ambitious and...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Indian Express</div><p align="justify"><br />The Supreme Court order restricting authorities from denying a benefit or service to any citizen of India for not having an Aadhaar card has put the Congress-led government, which had made Aadhaar the basis of its ambitious and overarching Direct Benefits Transfer (DBT) scheme, in a tight spot.</p><p align="justify">The idea behind linking DBT - which aims at eliminating middlemen and plugging leakages in schemes - to Aadhaar was sound, the prime objective being to eliminate duplication as well as ghost beneficiaries. However, the problem was that the government, perhaps driven by electoral considerations, squeezed in too much, too soon. Aadhaar was made the basis of this fairly complex scheme at a time when it was itself in its nascent stages, when Aadhaar enrollment rates were low and seeding with bank accounts poor.</p><p align="justify">Thus, linking a new, little-understood scheme to Aadhaar - whose need was still being debated - led to absolute confusion. To add to it, the government expanded the Aadhaar-linked DBT scheme to 121 districts in July.</p><p align="justify">Compounding the problem further was the ambiguity of the government's approach. It maintained Aadhaar was not mandatory but subtly conveyed that citizens had no option but to get themselves enrolled. In Delhi for instance, an Aadhaar number is needed to register marriages, property or even to obtain income certificates. In villages, people have been told they won't get anything - work under the MGNREGA, rations, or school admissions - without Aadhaar.</p><p align="justify">At a larger level, the government started making more schemes dependent on Aadhaar by bringing them under the DBT net. Thus, people had to get themselves enrolled if they wanted the cash subsidy for kerosene in some districts; or if they wanted their pensions and scholarships directly in bank accounts. Now LPG subsidy is set to be brought under DBT in 289 districts by the beginning of next year.</p><p align="justify">The apex court's order, meanwhile, has put the government on a sticky wicket. It had envisioned the implementation of the DBT - which it hoped would be its electoral trump card - on the basis of Aadhaar-linked bank accounts. It would be difficult for the government to go back on the plan now, but it would be equally tricky to blatantly insist on Aadhaar to be eligible for benefits under the DBT.</p><p align="justify">With barely any time left for polls, it faces an arduous task.</p><p align="justify"><em>Ruhi is a special correspondent based in Delhi </em></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 22713, 'title' => 'A lot rests on Aadhaar for govt -Ruhi Tewari', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Indian Express </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> The Supreme Court order restricting authorities from denying a benefit or service to any citizen of India for not having an Aadhaar card has put the Congress-led government, which had made Aadhaar the basis of its ambitious and overarching Direct Benefits Transfer (DBT) scheme, in a tight spot. </p> <p align="justify"> The idea behind linking DBT - which aims at eliminating middlemen and plugging leakages in schemes - to Aadhaar was sound, the prime objective being to eliminate duplication as well as ghost beneficiaries. However, the problem was that the government, perhaps driven by electoral considerations, squeezed in too much, too soon. Aadhaar was made the basis of this fairly complex scheme at a time when it was itself in its nascent stages, when Aadhaar enrollment rates were low and seeding with bank accounts poor. </p> <p align="justify"> Thus, linking a new, little-understood scheme to Aadhaar - whose need was still being debated - led to absolute confusion. To add to it, the government expanded the Aadhaar-linked DBT scheme to 121 districts in July. </p> <p align="justify"> Compounding the problem further was the ambiguity of the government's approach. It maintained Aadhaar was not mandatory but subtly conveyed that citizens had no option but to get themselves enrolled. In Delhi for instance, an Aadhaar number is needed to register marriages, property or even to obtain income certificates. In villages, people have been told they won't get anything - work under the MGNREGA, rations, or school admissions - without Aadhaar. </p> <p align="justify"> At a larger level, the government started making more schemes dependent on Aadhaar by bringing them under the DBT net. Thus, people had to get themselves enrolled if they wanted the cash subsidy for kerosene in some districts; or if they wanted their pensions and scholarships directly in bank accounts. Now LPG subsidy is set to be brought under DBT in 289 districts by the beginning of next year. </p> <p align="justify"> The apex court's order, meanwhile, has put the government on a sticky wicket. It had envisioned the implementation of the DBT - which it hoped would be its electoral trump card - on the basis of Aadhaar-linked bank accounts. It would be difficult for the government to go back on the plan now, but it would be equally tricky to blatantly insist on Aadhaar to be eligible for benefits under the DBT. </p> <p align="justify"> With barely any time left for polls, it faces an arduous task. </p> <p align="justify"> <em>Ruhi is a special correspondent based in Delhi </em> </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 1 October, 2013, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/a-lot-rests-on-aadhaar-for-govt/1176553/0', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'a-lot-rests-on-aadhaar-for-govt-ruhi-tewari-22867', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 22867, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 22713 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | A lot rests on Aadhaar for govt -Ruhi Tewari' $metaKeywords = 'aadhaar,uid,UIDAI,Direct Benefit Transfer' $metaDesc = ' -The Indian Express The Supreme Court order restricting authorities from denying a benefit or service to any citizen of India for not having an Aadhaar card has put the Congress-led government, which had made Aadhaar the basis of its ambitious and...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Indian Express</div><p align="justify"><br />The Supreme Court order restricting authorities from denying a benefit or service to any citizen of India for not having an Aadhaar card has put the Congress-led government, which had made Aadhaar the basis of its ambitious and overarching Direct Benefits Transfer (DBT) scheme, in a tight spot.</p><p align="justify">The idea behind linking DBT - which aims at eliminating middlemen and plugging leakages in schemes - to Aadhaar was sound, the prime objective being to eliminate duplication as well as ghost beneficiaries. However, the problem was that the government, perhaps driven by electoral considerations, squeezed in too much, too soon. Aadhaar was made the basis of this fairly complex scheme at a time when it was itself in its nascent stages, when Aadhaar enrollment rates were low and seeding with bank accounts poor.</p><p align="justify">Thus, linking a new, little-understood scheme to Aadhaar - whose need was still being debated - led to absolute confusion. To add to it, the government expanded the Aadhaar-linked DBT scheme to 121 districts in July.</p><p align="justify">Compounding the problem further was the ambiguity of the government's approach. It maintained Aadhaar was not mandatory but subtly conveyed that citizens had no option but to get themselves enrolled. In Delhi for instance, an Aadhaar number is needed to register marriages, property or even to obtain income certificates. In villages, people have been told they won't get anything - work under the MGNREGA, rations, or school admissions - without Aadhaar.</p><p align="justify">At a larger level, the government started making more schemes dependent on Aadhaar by bringing them under the DBT net. Thus, people had to get themselves enrolled if they wanted the cash subsidy for kerosene in some districts; or if they wanted their pensions and scholarships directly in bank accounts. Now LPG subsidy is set to be brought under DBT in 289 districts by the beginning of next year.</p><p align="justify">The apex court's order, meanwhile, has put the government on a sticky wicket. It had envisioned the implementation of the DBT - which it hoped would be its electoral trump card - on the basis of Aadhaar-linked bank accounts. It would be difficult for the government to go back on the plan now, but it would be equally tricky to blatantly insist on Aadhaar to be eligible for benefits under the DBT.</p><p align="justify">With barely any time left for polls, it faces an arduous task.</p><p align="justify"><em>Ruhi is a special correspondent based in Delhi </em></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
A lot rests on Aadhaar for govt -Ruhi Tewari |
-The Indian Express
The idea behind linking DBT - which aims at eliminating middlemen and plugging leakages in schemes - to Aadhaar was sound, the prime objective being to eliminate duplication as well as ghost beneficiaries. However, the problem was that the government, perhaps driven by electoral considerations, squeezed in too much, too soon. Aadhaar was made the basis of this fairly complex scheme at a time when it was itself in its nascent stages, when Aadhaar enrollment rates were low and seeding with bank accounts poor. Thus, linking a new, little-understood scheme to Aadhaar - whose need was still being debated - led to absolute confusion. To add to it, the government expanded the Aadhaar-linked DBT scheme to 121 districts in July. Compounding the problem further was the ambiguity of the government's approach. It maintained Aadhaar was not mandatory but subtly conveyed that citizens had no option but to get themselves enrolled. In Delhi for instance, an Aadhaar number is needed to register marriages, property or even to obtain income certificates. In villages, people have been told they won't get anything - work under the MGNREGA, rations, or school admissions - without Aadhaar. At a larger level, the government started making more schemes dependent on Aadhaar by bringing them under the DBT net. Thus, people had to get themselves enrolled if they wanted the cash subsidy for kerosene in some districts; or if they wanted their pensions and scholarships directly in bank accounts. Now LPG subsidy is set to be brought under DBT in 289 districts by the beginning of next year. The apex court's order, meanwhile, has put the government on a sticky wicket. It had envisioned the implementation of the DBT - which it hoped would be its electoral trump card - on the basis of Aadhaar-linked bank accounts. It would be difficult for the government to go back on the plan now, but it would be equally tricky to blatantly insist on Aadhaar to be eligible for benefits under the DBT. With barely any time left for polls, it faces an arduous task. Ruhi is a special correspondent based in Delhi |