Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/a-move-that-can-backfire-why-bjp-should-not-rush-the-land-bill-kumkum-dasgupta-4675402/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/a-move-that-can-backfire-why-bjp-should-not-rush-the-land-bill-kumkum-dasgupta-4675402/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/a-move-that-can-backfire-why-bjp-should-not-rush-the-land-bill-kumkum-dasgupta-4675402/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/a-move-that-can-backfire-why-bjp-should-not-rush-the-land-bill-kumkum-dasgupta-4675402/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f44bc304a13-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f44bc304a13-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f44bc304a13-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f44bc304a13-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f44bc304a13-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f44bc304a13-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f44bc304a13-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f44bc304a13-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f44bc304a13-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 27351, 'title' => 'A move that can backfire: Why BJP should not rush the land bill -KumKum Dasgupta', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -Hindustan Times </div> <p align="justify"> The Narendra Modi government has decided to introduce the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (Amendment) Bill, 2015, in Lok Sabha today. The controversial Bill seeks approval of Parliament for changes brought in the law through an ordinance or emergency executive order in December 2014. The Bill will lapse on March 20, if it is not passed during this budget session that began on Monday. The Bill will sail through in the Lok Sabha where it has majority but the problem will lie in the Rajya Sabha where it does not have the numbers. </p> <p align="justify"> There are mainly two clauses that are contentious in the ordinance: Waiving off the consent clause and social impact assessment for public-private partnership projects and private companies. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;The legislation leaves it vague and to the interpretation of the states, and it is not acceptable to the stakeholders. They want clearly stated provisions with no scope for ambiguity,&quot; a senior BJP leader told a national daily recently. </p> <p align="justify"> Whether the BJP agrees or not, the land bill has given the Opposition, which was down and out after the general elections of 2014, an issue to rally around, and it could turn out to be a costly mistake for the party in the long run. </p> <p align="justify"> On Monday, President Pranab Mukherjee said that the law has been suitably refined to protect farmers' interests during land acquisition for crucial public projects, the Opposition is not in a mood to relent. The Congress has already given a notice for suspension of Question Hour in the Upper House to discuss the ordinance. Party chief Sonia Gandhi on Monday said the President's speech had nothing new but was a rehash of UPA policies. </p> <p align="justify"> The Anna challenge </p> <p align="justify"> Outside Parliament, the NDA has another mega problem: Anti-corruption crusader and social activist Anna Hazare has launched a protest against the Bill. He will be joined by Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal and his two-day protest will be followed by a three to four month long 'padyatra' across the country to make people aware of the &quot;anti-farmer&quot; provisions made by the Centre in the ordinance. </p> <p align="justify"> There are many out there who think that Anna Hazare is a spent force but on an issue like this, it would be best not to underestimate him. He still has the cache to become the face of a public protest on an issue like this, which can be portrayed as an example of the &quot;nexus between the government and the corporate&quot; against the poor. In a poor country like India, where 60% of the people are dependent on land, this equation could be dangerous for any ruling party. In fact, the BJP would do well to remember how mishandling of the Anna agitation by the Congress had cost the party dear. </p> <p align="justify"> Hazare's protests in Jantar Mantar will also be joined by Ekta Parishad's PV Rajagopal who is leading a march from Palwal in Haryana and will reach Delhi today. This party too has been working on land rights for a long time and has deep roots in the agrarian community. </p> <p align="justify"> What about land reforms? </p> <p align="justify"> I am not surprised that the BJP is keen to tackle the land acquisition issue head on but its messaging on the issue has been extremely poor. It is also surprising that it has taken this &lsquo;my way or the highway' line on this sensitive issue because all along the government had been talking to different stakeholders about the Bill and it should have gauged the opposition to it by now. Even its own constituents have argued against the Bill. </p> <p align="justify"> The BJP could have played it differently by promising to undertake two projects that never took off after Independence: Land reforms and land distribution to the landless and homeless poor. </p> <p align="justify"> Equitable distribution of land has remained an unaccomplished task in India although most states had enacted land reform laws in the 1950s with the objectives of abolishing 'landlordism' and providing 'land to the tiller'. </p> <p align="justify"> The now-defunct Planning Commission had also identified lack of political will, inadequate land policy, legal and bureaucratic hurdles, litigation, lack of correct land records and weak administrative machinery responsible for zero movement on the issue. </p> <p align="justify"> The National Council for Land Reforms, which the UPA set up in 2008, is yet to meet even once. Prime Minister Modi as the chairman of the council could have revived the body and looked into this unfinished agenda instead of only putting all his weight behind the draconian land acquisition Bill, which a senior columnist has aptly called The Land Acquisition Forces (Special Powers) Act. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'Hindustan Times, 24 February, 2015, http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/a-move-that-can-backfire-why-bjp-should-not-rush-the-land-bill/article1-1319997.aspx', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'a-move-that-can-backfire-why-bjp-should-not-rush-the-land-bill-kumkum-dasgupta-4675402', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4675402, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 27351, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | A move that can backfire: Why BJP should not rush the land bill -KumKum Dasgupta', 'metaKeywords' => 'Land Ordinance,Social Impact Assessment,Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Rehabilitation and Resettlement law,land reforms,Land Distribution,Land Acquisition,Land Acquisition Act,land acquisition and rehabilitation', 'metaDesc' => ' -Hindustan Times The Narendra Modi government has decided to introduce the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (Amendment) Bill, 2015, in Lok Sabha today. The controversial Bill seeks approval of Parliament for changes brought in...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-Hindustan Times</div><p align="justify">The Narendra Modi government has decided to introduce the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (Amendment) Bill, 2015, in Lok Sabha today. The controversial Bill seeks approval of Parliament for changes brought in the law through an ordinance or emergency executive order in December 2014. The Bill will lapse on March 20, if it is not passed during this budget session that began on Monday. The Bill will sail through in the Lok Sabha where it has majority but the problem will lie in the Rajya Sabha where it does not have the numbers.</p><p align="justify">There are mainly two clauses that are contentious in the ordinance: Waiving off the consent clause and social impact assessment for public-private partnership projects and private companies.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The legislation leaves it vague and to the interpretation of the states, and it is not acceptable to the stakeholders. They want clearly stated provisions with no scope for ambiguity,&quot; a senior BJP leader told a national daily recently.</p><p align="justify">Whether the BJP agrees or not, the land bill has given the Opposition, which was down and out after the general elections of 2014, an issue to rally around, and it could turn out to be a costly mistake for the party in the long run.</p><p align="justify">On Monday, President Pranab Mukherjee said that the law has been suitably refined to protect farmers' interests during land acquisition for crucial public projects, the Opposition is not in a mood to relent. The Congress has already given a notice for suspension of Question Hour in the Upper House to discuss the ordinance. Party chief Sonia Gandhi on Monday said the President's speech had nothing new but was a rehash of UPA policies.</p><p align="justify">The Anna challenge</p><p align="justify">Outside Parliament, the NDA has another mega problem: Anti-corruption crusader and social activist Anna Hazare has launched a protest against the Bill. He will be joined by Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal and his two-day protest will be followed by a three to four month long 'padyatra' across the country to make people aware of the &quot;anti-farmer&quot; provisions made by the Centre in the ordinance.</p><p align="justify">There are many out there who think that Anna Hazare is a spent force but on an issue like this, it would be best not to underestimate him. He still has the cache to become the face of a public protest on an issue like this, which can be portrayed as an example of the &quot;nexus between the government and the corporate&quot; against the poor. In a poor country like India, where 60% of the people are dependent on land, this equation could be dangerous for any ruling party. In fact, the BJP would do well to remember how mishandling of the Anna agitation by the Congress had cost the party dear.</p><p align="justify">Hazare's protests in Jantar Mantar will also be joined by Ekta Parishad's PV Rajagopal who is leading a march from Palwal in Haryana and will reach Delhi today. This party too has been working on land rights for a long time and has deep roots in the agrarian community.</p><p align="justify">What about land reforms?</p><p align="justify">I am not surprised that the BJP is keen to tackle the land acquisition issue head on but its messaging on the issue has been extremely poor. It is also surprising that it has taken this &lsquo;my way or the highway' line on this sensitive issue because all along the government had been talking to different stakeholders about the Bill and it should have gauged the opposition to it by now. Even its own constituents have argued against the Bill.</p><p align="justify">The BJP could have played it differently by promising to undertake two projects that never took off after Independence: Land reforms and land distribution to the landless and homeless poor.</p><p align="justify">Equitable distribution of land has remained an unaccomplished task in India although most states had enacted land reform laws in the 1950s with the objectives of abolishing 'landlordism' and providing 'land to the tiller'.</p><p align="justify">The now-defunct Planning Commission had also identified lack of political will, inadequate land policy, legal and bureaucratic hurdles, litigation, lack of correct land records and weak administrative machinery responsible for zero movement on the issue.</p><p align="justify">The National Council for Land Reforms, which the UPA set up in 2008, is yet to meet even once. Prime Minister Modi as the chairman of the council could have revived the body and looked into this unfinished agenda instead of only putting all his weight behind the draconian land acquisition Bill, which a senior columnist has aptly called The Land Acquisition Forces (Special Powers) Act.</p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 27351, 'title' => 'A move that can backfire: Why BJP should not rush the land bill -KumKum Dasgupta', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -Hindustan Times </div> <p align="justify"> The Narendra Modi government has decided to introduce the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (Amendment) Bill, 2015, in Lok Sabha today. The controversial Bill seeks approval of Parliament for changes brought in the law through an ordinance or emergency executive order in December 2014. The Bill will lapse on March 20, if it is not passed during this budget session that began on Monday. The Bill will sail through in the Lok Sabha where it has majority but the problem will lie in the Rajya Sabha where it does not have the numbers. </p> <p align="justify"> There are mainly two clauses that are contentious in the ordinance: Waiving off the consent clause and social impact assessment for public-private partnership projects and private companies. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;The legislation leaves it vague and to the interpretation of the states, and it is not acceptable to the stakeholders. They want clearly stated provisions with no scope for ambiguity,&quot; a senior BJP leader told a national daily recently. </p> <p align="justify"> Whether the BJP agrees or not, the land bill has given the Opposition, which was down and out after the general elections of 2014, an issue to rally around, and it could turn out to be a costly mistake for the party in the long run. </p> <p align="justify"> On Monday, President Pranab Mukherjee said that the law has been suitably refined to protect farmers' interests during land acquisition for crucial public projects, the Opposition is not in a mood to relent. The Congress has already given a notice for suspension of Question Hour in the Upper House to discuss the ordinance. Party chief Sonia Gandhi on Monday said the President's speech had nothing new but was a rehash of UPA policies. </p> <p align="justify"> The Anna challenge </p> <p align="justify"> Outside Parliament, the NDA has another mega problem: Anti-corruption crusader and social activist Anna Hazare has launched a protest against the Bill. He will be joined by Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal and his two-day protest will be followed by a three to four month long 'padyatra' across the country to make people aware of the &quot;anti-farmer&quot; provisions made by the Centre in the ordinance. </p> <p align="justify"> There are many out there who think that Anna Hazare is a spent force but on an issue like this, it would be best not to underestimate him. He still has the cache to become the face of a public protest on an issue like this, which can be portrayed as an example of the &quot;nexus between the government and the corporate&quot; against the poor. In a poor country like India, where 60% of the people are dependent on land, this equation could be dangerous for any ruling party. In fact, the BJP would do well to remember how mishandling of the Anna agitation by the Congress had cost the party dear. </p> <p align="justify"> Hazare's protests in Jantar Mantar will also be joined by Ekta Parishad's PV Rajagopal who is leading a march from Palwal in Haryana and will reach Delhi today. This party too has been working on land rights for a long time and has deep roots in the agrarian community. </p> <p align="justify"> What about land reforms? </p> <p align="justify"> I am not surprised that the BJP is keen to tackle the land acquisition issue head on but its messaging on the issue has been extremely poor. It is also surprising that it has taken this &lsquo;my way or the highway' line on this sensitive issue because all along the government had been talking to different stakeholders about the Bill and it should have gauged the opposition to it by now. Even its own constituents have argued against the Bill. </p> <p align="justify"> The BJP could have played it differently by promising to undertake two projects that never took off after Independence: Land reforms and land distribution to the landless and homeless poor. </p> <p align="justify"> Equitable distribution of land has remained an unaccomplished task in India although most states had enacted land reform laws in the 1950s with the objectives of abolishing 'landlordism' and providing 'land to the tiller'. </p> <p align="justify"> The now-defunct Planning Commission had also identified lack of political will, inadequate land policy, legal and bureaucratic hurdles, litigation, lack of correct land records and weak administrative machinery responsible for zero movement on the issue. </p> <p align="justify"> The National Council for Land Reforms, which the UPA set up in 2008, is yet to meet even once. Prime Minister Modi as the chairman of the council could have revived the body and looked into this unfinished agenda instead of only putting all his weight behind the draconian land acquisition Bill, which a senior columnist has aptly called The Land Acquisition Forces (Special Powers) Act. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'Hindustan Times, 24 February, 2015, http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/a-move-that-can-backfire-why-bjp-should-not-rush-the-land-bill/article1-1319997.aspx', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'a-move-that-can-backfire-why-bjp-should-not-rush-the-land-bill-kumkum-dasgupta-4675402', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4675402, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 5 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 6 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 7 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 27351 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | A move that can backfire: Why BJP should not rush the land bill -KumKum Dasgupta' $metaKeywords = 'Land Ordinance,Social Impact Assessment,Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Rehabilitation and Resettlement law,land reforms,Land Distribution,Land Acquisition,Land Acquisition Act,land acquisition and rehabilitation' $metaDesc = ' -Hindustan Times The Narendra Modi government has decided to introduce the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (Amendment) Bill, 2015, in Lok Sabha today. The controversial Bill seeks approval of Parliament for changes brought in...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-Hindustan Times</div><p align="justify">The Narendra Modi government has decided to introduce the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (Amendment) Bill, 2015, in Lok Sabha today. The controversial Bill seeks approval of Parliament for changes brought in the law through an ordinance or emergency executive order in December 2014. The Bill will lapse on March 20, if it is not passed during this budget session that began on Monday. The Bill will sail through in the Lok Sabha where it has majority but the problem will lie in the Rajya Sabha where it does not have the numbers.</p><p align="justify">There are mainly two clauses that are contentious in the ordinance: Waiving off the consent clause and social impact assessment for public-private partnership projects and private companies.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The legislation leaves it vague and to the interpretation of the states, and it is not acceptable to the stakeholders. They want clearly stated provisions with no scope for ambiguity,&quot; a senior BJP leader told a national daily recently.</p><p align="justify">Whether the BJP agrees or not, the land bill has given the Opposition, which was down and out after the general elections of 2014, an issue to rally around, and it could turn out to be a costly mistake for the party in the long run.</p><p align="justify">On Monday, President Pranab Mukherjee said that the law has been suitably refined to protect farmers' interests during land acquisition for crucial public projects, the Opposition is not in a mood to relent. The Congress has already given a notice for suspension of Question Hour in the Upper House to discuss the ordinance. Party chief Sonia Gandhi on Monday said the President's speech had nothing new but was a rehash of UPA policies.</p><p align="justify">The Anna challenge</p><p align="justify">Outside Parliament, the NDA has another mega problem: Anti-corruption crusader and social activist Anna Hazare has launched a protest against the Bill. He will be joined by Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal and his two-day protest will be followed by a three to four month long 'padyatra' across the country to make people aware of the &quot;anti-farmer&quot; provisions made by the Centre in the ordinance.</p><p align="justify">There are many out there who think that Anna Hazare is a spent force but on an issue like this, it would be best not to underestimate him. He still has the cache to become the face of a public protest on an issue like this, which can be portrayed as an example of the &quot;nexus between the government and the corporate&quot; against the poor. In a poor country like India, where 60% of the people are dependent on land, this equation could be dangerous for any ruling party. In fact, the BJP would do well to remember how mishandling of the Anna agitation by the Congress had cost the party dear.</p><p align="justify">Hazare's protests in Jantar Mantar will also be joined by Ekta Parishad's PV Rajagopal who is leading a march from Palwal in Haryana and will reach Delhi today. This party too has been working on land rights for a long time and has deep roots in the agrarian community.</p><p align="justify">What about land reforms?</p><p align="justify">I am not surprised that the BJP is keen to tackle the land acquisition issue head on but its messaging on the issue has been extremely poor. It is also surprising that it has taken this &lsquo;my way or the highway' line on this sensitive issue because all along the government had been talking to different stakeholders about the Bill and it should have gauged the opposition to it by now. Even its own constituents have argued against the Bill.</p><p align="justify">The BJP could have played it differently by promising to undertake two projects that never took off after Independence: Land reforms and land distribution to the landless and homeless poor.</p><p align="justify">Equitable distribution of land has remained an unaccomplished task in India although most states had enacted land reform laws in the 1950s with the objectives of abolishing 'landlordism' and providing 'land to the tiller'.</p><p align="justify">The now-defunct Planning Commission had also identified lack of political will, inadequate land policy, legal and bureaucratic hurdles, litigation, lack of correct land records and weak administrative machinery responsible for zero movement on the issue.</p><p align="justify">The National Council for Land Reforms, which the UPA set up in 2008, is yet to meet even once. Prime Minister Modi as the chairman of the council could have revived the body and looked into this unfinished agenda instead of only putting all his weight behind the draconian land acquisition Bill, which a senior columnist has aptly called The Land Acquisition Forces (Special Powers) Act.</p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/a-move-that-can-backfire-why-bjp-should-not-rush-the-land-bill-kumkum-dasgupta-4675402.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | A move that can backfire: Why BJP should not rush the land bill -KumKum Dasgupta | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -Hindustan Times The Narendra Modi government has decided to introduce the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (Amendment) Bill, 2015, in Lok Sabha today. The controversial Bill seeks approval of Parliament for changes brought in..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>A move that can backfire: Why BJP should not rush the land bill -KumKum Dasgupta</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-Hindustan Times</div><p align="justify">The Narendra Modi government has decided to introduce the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (Amendment) Bill, 2015, in Lok Sabha today. The controversial Bill seeks approval of Parliament for changes brought in the law through an ordinance or emergency executive order in December 2014. The Bill will lapse on March 20, if it is not passed during this budget session that began on Monday. The Bill will sail through in the Lok Sabha where it has majority but the problem will lie in the Rajya Sabha where it does not have the numbers.</p><p align="justify">There are mainly two clauses that are contentious in the ordinance: Waiving off the consent clause and social impact assessment for public-private partnership projects and private companies.</p><p align="justify">"The legislation leaves it vague and to the interpretation of the states, and it is not acceptable to the stakeholders. They want clearly stated provisions with no scope for ambiguity," a senior BJP leader told a national daily recently.</p><p align="justify">Whether the BJP agrees or not, the land bill has given the Opposition, which was down and out after the general elections of 2014, an issue to rally around, and it could turn out to be a costly mistake for the party in the long run.</p><p align="justify">On Monday, President Pranab Mukherjee said that the law has been suitably refined to protect farmers' interests during land acquisition for crucial public projects, the Opposition is not in a mood to relent. The Congress has already given a notice for suspension of Question Hour in the Upper House to discuss the ordinance. Party chief Sonia Gandhi on Monday said the President's speech had nothing new but was a rehash of UPA policies.</p><p align="justify">The Anna challenge</p><p align="justify">Outside Parliament, the NDA has another mega problem: Anti-corruption crusader and social activist Anna Hazare has launched a protest against the Bill. He will be joined by Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal and his two-day protest will be followed by a three to four month long 'padyatra' across the country to make people aware of the "anti-farmer" provisions made by the Centre in the ordinance.</p><p align="justify">There are many out there who think that Anna Hazare is a spent force but on an issue like this, it would be best not to underestimate him. He still has the cache to become the face of a public protest on an issue like this, which can be portrayed as an example of the "nexus between the government and the corporate" against the poor. In a poor country like India, where 60% of the people are dependent on land, this equation could be dangerous for any ruling party. In fact, the BJP would do well to remember how mishandling of the Anna agitation by the Congress had cost the party dear.</p><p align="justify">Hazare's protests in Jantar Mantar will also be joined by Ekta Parishad's PV Rajagopal who is leading a march from Palwal in Haryana and will reach Delhi today. This party too has been working on land rights for a long time and has deep roots in the agrarian community.</p><p align="justify">What about land reforms?</p><p align="justify">I am not surprised that the BJP is keen to tackle the land acquisition issue head on but its messaging on the issue has been extremely poor. It is also surprising that it has taken this ‘my way or the highway' line on this sensitive issue because all along the government had been talking to different stakeholders about the Bill and it should have gauged the opposition to it by now. Even its own constituents have argued against the Bill.</p><p align="justify">The BJP could have played it differently by promising to undertake two projects that never took off after Independence: Land reforms and land distribution to the landless and homeless poor.</p><p align="justify">Equitable distribution of land has remained an unaccomplished task in India although most states had enacted land reform laws in the 1950s with the objectives of abolishing 'landlordism' and providing 'land to the tiller'.</p><p align="justify">The now-defunct Planning Commission had also identified lack of political will, inadequate land policy, legal and bureaucratic hurdles, litigation, lack of correct land records and weak administrative machinery responsible for zero movement on the issue.</p><p align="justify">The National Council for Land Reforms, which the UPA set up in 2008, is yet to meet even once. Prime Minister Modi as the chairman of the council could have revived the body and looked into this unfinished agenda instead of only putting all his weight behind the draconian land acquisition Bill, which a senior columnist has aptly called The Land Acquisition Forces (Special Powers) Act.</p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f44bc304a13-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f44bc304a13-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f44bc304a13-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f44bc304a13-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f44bc304a13-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f44bc304a13-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f44bc304a13-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f44bc304a13-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f44bc304a13-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 27351, 'title' => 'A move that can backfire: Why BJP should not rush the land bill -KumKum Dasgupta', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -Hindustan Times </div> <p align="justify"> The Narendra Modi government has decided to introduce the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (Amendment) Bill, 2015, in Lok Sabha today. The controversial Bill seeks approval of Parliament for changes brought in the law through an ordinance or emergency executive order in December 2014. The Bill will lapse on March 20, if it is not passed during this budget session that began on Monday. The Bill will sail through in the Lok Sabha where it has majority but the problem will lie in the Rajya Sabha where it does not have the numbers. </p> <p align="justify"> There are mainly two clauses that are contentious in the ordinance: Waiving off the consent clause and social impact assessment for public-private partnership projects and private companies. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;The legislation leaves it vague and to the interpretation of the states, and it is not acceptable to the stakeholders. They want clearly stated provisions with no scope for ambiguity,&quot; a senior BJP leader told a national daily recently. </p> <p align="justify"> Whether the BJP agrees or not, the land bill has given the Opposition, which was down and out after the general elections of 2014, an issue to rally around, and it could turn out to be a costly mistake for the party in the long run. </p> <p align="justify"> On Monday, President Pranab Mukherjee said that the law has been suitably refined to protect farmers' interests during land acquisition for crucial public projects, the Opposition is not in a mood to relent. The Congress has already given a notice for suspension of Question Hour in the Upper House to discuss the ordinance. Party chief Sonia Gandhi on Monday said the President's speech had nothing new but was a rehash of UPA policies. </p> <p align="justify"> The Anna challenge </p> <p align="justify"> Outside Parliament, the NDA has another mega problem: Anti-corruption crusader and social activist Anna Hazare has launched a protest against the Bill. He will be joined by Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal and his two-day protest will be followed by a three to four month long 'padyatra' across the country to make people aware of the &quot;anti-farmer&quot; provisions made by the Centre in the ordinance. </p> <p align="justify"> There are many out there who think that Anna Hazare is a spent force but on an issue like this, it would be best not to underestimate him. He still has the cache to become the face of a public protest on an issue like this, which can be portrayed as an example of the &quot;nexus between the government and the corporate&quot; against the poor. In a poor country like India, where 60% of the people are dependent on land, this equation could be dangerous for any ruling party. In fact, the BJP would do well to remember how mishandling of the Anna agitation by the Congress had cost the party dear. </p> <p align="justify"> Hazare's protests in Jantar Mantar will also be joined by Ekta Parishad's PV Rajagopal who is leading a march from Palwal in Haryana and will reach Delhi today. This party too has been working on land rights for a long time and has deep roots in the agrarian community. </p> <p align="justify"> What about land reforms? </p> <p align="justify"> I am not surprised that the BJP is keen to tackle the land acquisition issue head on but its messaging on the issue has been extremely poor. It is also surprising that it has taken this &lsquo;my way or the highway' line on this sensitive issue because all along the government had been talking to different stakeholders about the Bill and it should have gauged the opposition to it by now. Even its own constituents have argued against the Bill. </p> <p align="justify"> The BJP could have played it differently by promising to undertake two projects that never took off after Independence: Land reforms and land distribution to the landless and homeless poor. </p> <p align="justify"> Equitable distribution of land has remained an unaccomplished task in India although most states had enacted land reform laws in the 1950s with the objectives of abolishing 'landlordism' and providing 'land to the tiller'. </p> <p align="justify"> The now-defunct Planning Commission had also identified lack of political will, inadequate land policy, legal and bureaucratic hurdles, litigation, lack of correct land records and weak administrative machinery responsible for zero movement on the issue. </p> <p align="justify"> The National Council for Land Reforms, which the UPA set up in 2008, is yet to meet even once. Prime Minister Modi as the chairman of the council could have revived the body and looked into this unfinished agenda instead of only putting all his weight behind the draconian land acquisition Bill, which a senior columnist has aptly called The Land Acquisition Forces (Special Powers) Act. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'Hindustan Times, 24 February, 2015, http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/a-move-that-can-backfire-why-bjp-should-not-rush-the-land-bill/article1-1319997.aspx', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'a-move-that-can-backfire-why-bjp-should-not-rush-the-land-bill-kumkum-dasgupta-4675402', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4675402, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 27351, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | A move that can backfire: Why BJP should not rush the land bill -KumKum Dasgupta', 'metaKeywords' => 'Land Ordinance,Social Impact Assessment,Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Rehabilitation and Resettlement law,land reforms,Land Distribution,Land Acquisition,Land Acquisition Act,land acquisition and rehabilitation', 'metaDesc' => ' -Hindustan Times The Narendra Modi government has decided to introduce the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (Amendment) Bill, 2015, in Lok Sabha today. The controversial Bill seeks approval of Parliament for changes brought in...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-Hindustan Times</div><p align="justify">The Narendra Modi government has decided to introduce the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (Amendment) Bill, 2015, in Lok Sabha today. The controversial Bill seeks approval of Parliament for changes brought in the law through an ordinance or emergency executive order in December 2014. The Bill will lapse on March 20, if it is not passed during this budget session that began on Monday. The Bill will sail through in the Lok Sabha where it has majority but the problem will lie in the Rajya Sabha where it does not have the numbers.</p><p align="justify">There are mainly two clauses that are contentious in the ordinance: Waiving off the consent clause and social impact assessment for public-private partnership projects and private companies.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The legislation leaves it vague and to the interpretation of the states, and it is not acceptable to the stakeholders. They want clearly stated provisions with no scope for ambiguity,&quot; a senior BJP leader told a national daily recently.</p><p align="justify">Whether the BJP agrees or not, the land bill has given the Opposition, which was down and out after the general elections of 2014, an issue to rally around, and it could turn out to be a costly mistake for the party in the long run.</p><p align="justify">On Monday, President Pranab Mukherjee said that the law has been suitably refined to protect farmers' interests during land acquisition for crucial public projects, the Opposition is not in a mood to relent. The Congress has already given a notice for suspension of Question Hour in the Upper House to discuss the ordinance. Party chief Sonia Gandhi on Monday said the President's speech had nothing new but was a rehash of UPA policies.</p><p align="justify">The Anna challenge</p><p align="justify">Outside Parliament, the NDA has another mega problem: Anti-corruption crusader and social activist Anna Hazare has launched a protest against the Bill. He will be joined by Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal and his two-day protest will be followed by a three to four month long 'padyatra' across the country to make people aware of the &quot;anti-farmer&quot; provisions made by the Centre in the ordinance.</p><p align="justify">There are many out there who think that Anna Hazare is a spent force but on an issue like this, it would be best not to underestimate him. He still has the cache to become the face of a public protest on an issue like this, which can be portrayed as an example of the &quot;nexus between the government and the corporate&quot; against the poor. In a poor country like India, where 60% of the people are dependent on land, this equation could be dangerous for any ruling party. In fact, the BJP would do well to remember how mishandling of the Anna agitation by the Congress had cost the party dear.</p><p align="justify">Hazare's protests in Jantar Mantar will also be joined by Ekta Parishad's PV Rajagopal who is leading a march from Palwal in Haryana and will reach Delhi today. This party too has been working on land rights for a long time and has deep roots in the agrarian community.</p><p align="justify">What about land reforms?</p><p align="justify">I am not surprised that the BJP is keen to tackle the land acquisition issue head on but its messaging on the issue has been extremely poor. It is also surprising that it has taken this &lsquo;my way or the highway' line on this sensitive issue because all along the government had been talking to different stakeholders about the Bill and it should have gauged the opposition to it by now. Even its own constituents have argued against the Bill.</p><p align="justify">The BJP could have played it differently by promising to undertake two projects that never took off after Independence: Land reforms and land distribution to the landless and homeless poor.</p><p align="justify">Equitable distribution of land has remained an unaccomplished task in India although most states had enacted land reform laws in the 1950s with the objectives of abolishing 'landlordism' and providing 'land to the tiller'.</p><p align="justify">The now-defunct Planning Commission had also identified lack of political will, inadequate land policy, legal and bureaucratic hurdles, litigation, lack of correct land records and weak administrative machinery responsible for zero movement on the issue.</p><p align="justify">The National Council for Land Reforms, which the UPA set up in 2008, is yet to meet even once. Prime Minister Modi as the chairman of the council could have revived the body and looked into this unfinished agenda instead of only putting all his weight behind the draconian land acquisition Bill, which a senior columnist has aptly called The Land Acquisition Forces (Special Powers) Act.</p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 27351, 'title' => 'A move that can backfire: Why BJP should not rush the land bill -KumKum Dasgupta', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -Hindustan Times </div> <p align="justify"> The Narendra Modi government has decided to introduce the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (Amendment) Bill, 2015, in Lok Sabha today. The controversial Bill seeks approval of Parliament for changes brought in the law through an ordinance or emergency executive order in December 2014. The Bill will lapse on March 20, if it is not passed during this budget session that began on Monday. The Bill will sail through in the Lok Sabha where it has majority but the problem will lie in the Rajya Sabha where it does not have the numbers. </p> <p align="justify"> There are mainly two clauses that are contentious in the ordinance: Waiving off the consent clause and social impact assessment for public-private partnership projects and private companies. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;The legislation leaves it vague and to the interpretation of the states, and it is not acceptable to the stakeholders. They want clearly stated provisions with no scope for ambiguity,&quot; a senior BJP leader told a national daily recently. </p> <p align="justify"> Whether the BJP agrees or not, the land bill has given the Opposition, which was down and out after the general elections of 2014, an issue to rally around, and it could turn out to be a costly mistake for the party in the long run. </p> <p align="justify"> On Monday, President Pranab Mukherjee said that the law has been suitably refined to protect farmers' interests during land acquisition for crucial public projects, the Opposition is not in a mood to relent. The Congress has already given a notice for suspension of Question Hour in the Upper House to discuss the ordinance. Party chief Sonia Gandhi on Monday said the President's speech had nothing new but was a rehash of UPA policies. </p> <p align="justify"> The Anna challenge </p> <p align="justify"> Outside Parliament, the NDA has another mega problem: Anti-corruption crusader and social activist Anna Hazare has launched a protest against the Bill. He will be joined by Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal and his two-day protest will be followed by a three to four month long 'padyatra' across the country to make people aware of the &quot;anti-farmer&quot; provisions made by the Centre in the ordinance. </p> <p align="justify"> There are many out there who think that Anna Hazare is a spent force but on an issue like this, it would be best not to underestimate him. He still has the cache to become the face of a public protest on an issue like this, which can be portrayed as an example of the &quot;nexus between the government and the corporate&quot; against the poor. In a poor country like India, where 60% of the people are dependent on land, this equation could be dangerous for any ruling party. In fact, the BJP would do well to remember how mishandling of the Anna agitation by the Congress had cost the party dear. </p> <p align="justify"> Hazare's protests in Jantar Mantar will also be joined by Ekta Parishad's PV Rajagopal who is leading a march from Palwal in Haryana and will reach Delhi today. This party too has been working on land rights for a long time and has deep roots in the agrarian community. </p> <p align="justify"> What about land reforms? </p> <p align="justify"> I am not surprised that the BJP is keen to tackle the land acquisition issue head on but its messaging on the issue has been extremely poor. It is also surprising that it has taken this &lsquo;my way or the highway' line on this sensitive issue because all along the government had been talking to different stakeholders about the Bill and it should have gauged the opposition to it by now. Even its own constituents have argued against the Bill. </p> <p align="justify"> The BJP could have played it differently by promising to undertake two projects that never took off after Independence: Land reforms and land distribution to the landless and homeless poor. </p> <p align="justify"> Equitable distribution of land has remained an unaccomplished task in India although most states had enacted land reform laws in the 1950s with the objectives of abolishing 'landlordism' and providing 'land to the tiller'. </p> <p align="justify"> The now-defunct Planning Commission had also identified lack of political will, inadequate land policy, legal and bureaucratic hurdles, litigation, lack of correct land records and weak administrative machinery responsible for zero movement on the issue. </p> <p align="justify"> The National Council for Land Reforms, which the UPA set up in 2008, is yet to meet even once. Prime Minister Modi as the chairman of the council could have revived the body and looked into this unfinished agenda instead of only putting all his weight behind the draconian land acquisition Bill, which a senior columnist has aptly called The Land Acquisition Forces (Special Powers) Act. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'Hindustan Times, 24 February, 2015, http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/a-move-that-can-backfire-why-bjp-should-not-rush-the-land-bill/article1-1319997.aspx', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'a-move-that-can-backfire-why-bjp-should-not-rush-the-land-bill-kumkum-dasgupta-4675402', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4675402, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 5 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 6 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 7 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 27351 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | A move that can backfire: Why BJP should not rush the land bill -KumKum Dasgupta' $metaKeywords = 'Land Ordinance,Social Impact Assessment,Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Rehabilitation and Resettlement law,land reforms,Land Distribution,Land Acquisition,Land Acquisition Act,land acquisition and rehabilitation' $metaDesc = ' -Hindustan Times The Narendra Modi government has decided to introduce the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (Amendment) Bill, 2015, in Lok Sabha today. The controversial Bill seeks approval of Parliament for changes brought in...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-Hindustan Times</div><p align="justify">The Narendra Modi government has decided to introduce the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (Amendment) Bill, 2015, in Lok Sabha today. The controversial Bill seeks approval of Parliament for changes brought in the law through an ordinance or emergency executive order in December 2014. The Bill will lapse on March 20, if it is not passed during this budget session that began on Monday. The Bill will sail through in the Lok Sabha where it has majority but the problem will lie in the Rajya Sabha where it does not have the numbers.</p><p align="justify">There are mainly two clauses that are contentious in the ordinance: Waiving off the consent clause and social impact assessment for public-private partnership projects and private companies.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The legislation leaves it vague and to the interpretation of the states, and it is not acceptable to the stakeholders. They want clearly stated provisions with no scope for ambiguity,&quot; a senior BJP leader told a national daily recently.</p><p align="justify">Whether the BJP agrees or not, the land bill has given the Opposition, which was down and out after the general elections of 2014, an issue to rally around, and it could turn out to be a costly mistake for the party in the long run.</p><p align="justify">On Monday, President Pranab Mukherjee said that the law has been suitably refined to protect farmers' interests during land acquisition for crucial public projects, the Opposition is not in a mood to relent. The Congress has already given a notice for suspension of Question Hour in the Upper House to discuss the ordinance. Party chief Sonia Gandhi on Monday said the President's speech had nothing new but was a rehash of UPA policies.</p><p align="justify">The Anna challenge</p><p align="justify">Outside Parliament, the NDA has another mega problem: Anti-corruption crusader and social activist Anna Hazare has launched a protest against the Bill. He will be joined by Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal and his two-day protest will be followed by a three to four month long 'padyatra' across the country to make people aware of the &quot;anti-farmer&quot; provisions made by the Centre in the ordinance.</p><p align="justify">There are many out there who think that Anna Hazare is a spent force but on an issue like this, it would be best not to underestimate him. He still has the cache to become the face of a public protest on an issue like this, which can be portrayed as an example of the &quot;nexus between the government and the corporate&quot; against the poor. In a poor country like India, where 60% of the people are dependent on land, this equation could be dangerous for any ruling party. In fact, the BJP would do well to remember how mishandling of the Anna agitation by the Congress had cost the party dear.</p><p align="justify">Hazare's protests in Jantar Mantar will also be joined by Ekta Parishad's PV Rajagopal who is leading a march from Palwal in Haryana and will reach Delhi today. This party too has been working on land rights for a long time and has deep roots in the agrarian community.</p><p align="justify">What about land reforms?</p><p align="justify">I am not surprised that the BJP is keen to tackle the land acquisition issue head on but its messaging on the issue has been extremely poor. It is also surprising that it has taken this &lsquo;my way or the highway' line on this sensitive issue because all along the government had been talking to different stakeholders about the Bill and it should have gauged the opposition to it by now. Even its own constituents have argued against the Bill.</p><p align="justify">The BJP could have played it differently by promising to undertake two projects that never took off after Independence: Land reforms and land distribution to the landless and homeless poor.</p><p align="justify">Equitable distribution of land has remained an unaccomplished task in India although most states had enacted land reform laws in the 1950s with the objectives of abolishing 'landlordism' and providing 'land to the tiller'.</p><p align="justify">The now-defunct Planning Commission had also identified lack of political will, inadequate land policy, legal and bureaucratic hurdles, litigation, lack of correct land records and weak administrative machinery responsible for zero movement on the issue.</p><p align="justify">The National Council for Land Reforms, which the UPA set up in 2008, is yet to meet even once. Prime Minister Modi as the chairman of the council could have revived the body and looked into this unfinished agenda instead of only putting all his weight behind the draconian land acquisition Bill, which a senior columnist has aptly called The Land Acquisition Forces (Special Powers) Act.</p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/a-move-that-can-backfire-why-bjp-should-not-rush-the-land-bill-kumkum-dasgupta-4675402.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | A move that can backfire: Why BJP should not rush the land bill -KumKum Dasgupta | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -Hindustan Times The Narendra Modi government has decided to introduce the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (Amendment) Bill, 2015, in Lok Sabha today. The controversial Bill seeks approval of Parliament for changes brought in..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>A move that can backfire: Why BJP should not rush the land bill -KumKum Dasgupta</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-Hindustan Times</div><p align="justify">The Narendra Modi government has decided to introduce the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (Amendment) Bill, 2015, in Lok Sabha today. The controversial Bill seeks approval of Parliament for changes brought in the law through an ordinance or emergency executive order in December 2014. The Bill will lapse on March 20, if it is not passed during this budget session that began on Monday. The Bill will sail through in the Lok Sabha where it has majority but the problem will lie in the Rajya Sabha where it does not have the numbers.</p><p align="justify">There are mainly two clauses that are contentious in the ordinance: Waiving off the consent clause and social impact assessment for public-private partnership projects and private companies.</p><p align="justify">"The legislation leaves it vague and to the interpretation of the states, and it is not acceptable to the stakeholders. They want clearly stated provisions with no scope for ambiguity," a senior BJP leader told a national daily recently.</p><p align="justify">Whether the BJP agrees or not, the land bill has given the Opposition, which was down and out after the general elections of 2014, an issue to rally around, and it could turn out to be a costly mistake for the party in the long run.</p><p align="justify">On Monday, President Pranab Mukherjee said that the law has been suitably refined to protect farmers' interests during land acquisition for crucial public projects, the Opposition is not in a mood to relent. The Congress has already given a notice for suspension of Question Hour in the Upper House to discuss the ordinance. Party chief Sonia Gandhi on Monday said the President's speech had nothing new but was a rehash of UPA policies.</p><p align="justify">The Anna challenge</p><p align="justify">Outside Parliament, the NDA has another mega problem: Anti-corruption crusader and social activist Anna Hazare has launched a protest against the Bill. He will be joined by Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal and his two-day protest will be followed by a three to four month long 'padyatra' across the country to make people aware of the "anti-farmer" provisions made by the Centre in the ordinance.</p><p align="justify">There are many out there who think that Anna Hazare is a spent force but on an issue like this, it would be best not to underestimate him. He still has the cache to become the face of a public protest on an issue like this, which can be portrayed as an example of the "nexus between the government and the corporate" against the poor. In a poor country like India, where 60% of the people are dependent on land, this equation could be dangerous for any ruling party. In fact, the BJP would do well to remember how mishandling of the Anna agitation by the Congress had cost the party dear.</p><p align="justify">Hazare's protests in Jantar Mantar will also be joined by Ekta Parishad's PV Rajagopal who is leading a march from Palwal in Haryana and will reach Delhi today. This party too has been working on land rights for a long time and has deep roots in the agrarian community.</p><p align="justify">What about land reforms?</p><p align="justify">I am not surprised that the BJP is keen to tackle the land acquisition issue head on but its messaging on the issue has been extremely poor. It is also surprising that it has taken this ‘my way or the highway' line on this sensitive issue because all along the government had been talking to different stakeholders about the Bill and it should have gauged the opposition to it by now. Even its own constituents have argued against the Bill.</p><p align="justify">The BJP could have played it differently by promising to undertake two projects that never took off after Independence: Land reforms and land distribution to the landless and homeless poor.</p><p align="justify">Equitable distribution of land has remained an unaccomplished task in India although most states had enacted land reform laws in the 1950s with the objectives of abolishing 'landlordism' and providing 'land to the tiller'.</p><p align="justify">The now-defunct Planning Commission had also identified lack of political will, inadequate land policy, legal and bureaucratic hurdles, litigation, lack of correct land records and weak administrative machinery responsible for zero movement on the issue.</p><p align="justify">The National Council for Land Reforms, which the UPA set up in 2008, is yet to meet even once. Prime Minister Modi as the chairman of the council could have revived the body and looked into this unfinished agenda instead of only putting all his weight behind the draconian land acquisition Bill, which a senior columnist has aptly called The Land Acquisition Forces (Special Powers) Act.</p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f44bc304a13-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f44bc304a13-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f44bc304a13-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f44bc304a13-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f44bc304a13-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f44bc304a13-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f44bc304a13-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f44bc304a13-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f44bc304a13-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 27351, 'title' => 'A move that can backfire: Why BJP should not rush the land bill -KumKum Dasgupta', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -Hindustan Times </div> <p align="justify"> The Narendra Modi government has decided to introduce the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (Amendment) Bill, 2015, in Lok Sabha today. The controversial Bill seeks approval of Parliament for changes brought in the law through an ordinance or emergency executive order in December 2014. The Bill will lapse on March 20, if it is not passed during this budget session that began on Monday. The Bill will sail through in the Lok Sabha where it has majority but the problem will lie in the Rajya Sabha where it does not have the numbers. </p> <p align="justify"> There are mainly two clauses that are contentious in the ordinance: Waiving off the consent clause and social impact assessment for public-private partnership projects and private companies. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;The legislation leaves it vague and to the interpretation of the states, and it is not acceptable to the stakeholders. They want clearly stated provisions with no scope for ambiguity,&quot; a senior BJP leader told a national daily recently. </p> <p align="justify"> Whether the BJP agrees or not, the land bill has given the Opposition, which was down and out after the general elections of 2014, an issue to rally around, and it could turn out to be a costly mistake for the party in the long run. </p> <p align="justify"> On Monday, President Pranab Mukherjee said that the law has been suitably refined to protect farmers' interests during land acquisition for crucial public projects, the Opposition is not in a mood to relent. The Congress has already given a notice for suspension of Question Hour in the Upper House to discuss the ordinance. Party chief Sonia Gandhi on Monday said the President's speech had nothing new but was a rehash of UPA policies. </p> <p align="justify"> The Anna challenge </p> <p align="justify"> Outside Parliament, the NDA has another mega problem: Anti-corruption crusader and social activist Anna Hazare has launched a protest against the Bill. He will be joined by Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal and his two-day protest will be followed by a three to four month long 'padyatra' across the country to make people aware of the &quot;anti-farmer&quot; provisions made by the Centre in the ordinance. </p> <p align="justify"> There are many out there who think that Anna Hazare is a spent force but on an issue like this, it would be best not to underestimate him. He still has the cache to become the face of a public protest on an issue like this, which can be portrayed as an example of the &quot;nexus between the government and the corporate&quot; against the poor. In a poor country like India, where 60% of the people are dependent on land, this equation could be dangerous for any ruling party. In fact, the BJP would do well to remember how mishandling of the Anna agitation by the Congress had cost the party dear. </p> <p align="justify"> Hazare's protests in Jantar Mantar will also be joined by Ekta Parishad's PV Rajagopal who is leading a march from Palwal in Haryana and will reach Delhi today. This party too has been working on land rights for a long time and has deep roots in the agrarian community. </p> <p align="justify"> What about land reforms? </p> <p align="justify"> I am not surprised that the BJP is keen to tackle the land acquisition issue head on but its messaging on the issue has been extremely poor. It is also surprising that it has taken this &lsquo;my way or the highway' line on this sensitive issue because all along the government had been talking to different stakeholders about the Bill and it should have gauged the opposition to it by now. Even its own constituents have argued against the Bill. </p> <p align="justify"> The BJP could have played it differently by promising to undertake two projects that never took off after Independence: Land reforms and land distribution to the landless and homeless poor. </p> <p align="justify"> Equitable distribution of land has remained an unaccomplished task in India although most states had enacted land reform laws in the 1950s with the objectives of abolishing 'landlordism' and providing 'land to the tiller'. </p> <p align="justify"> The now-defunct Planning Commission had also identified lack of political will, inadequate land policy, legal and bureaucratic hurdles, litigation, lack of correct land records and weak administrative machinery responsible for zero movement on the issue. </p> <p align="justify"> The National Council for Land Reforms, which the UPA set up in 2008, is yet to meet even once. Prime Minister Modi as the chairman of the council could have revived the body and looked into this unfinished agenda instead of only putting all his weight behind the draconian land acquisition Bill, which a senior columnist has aptly called The Land Acquisition Forces (Special Powers) Act. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'Hindustan Times, 24 February, 2015, http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/a-move-that-can-backfire-why-bjp-should-not-rush-the-land-bill/article1-1319997.aspx', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'a-move-that-can-backfire-why-bjp-should-not-rush-the-land-bill-kumkum-dasgupta-4675402', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4675402, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 27351, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | A move that can backfire: Why BJP should not rush the land bill -KumKum Dasgupta', 'metaKeywords' => 'Land Ordinance,Social Impact Assessment,Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Rehabilitation and Resettlement law,land reforms,Land Distribution,Land Acquisition,Land Acquisition Act,land acquisition and rehabilitation', 'metaDesc' => ' -Hindustan Times The Narendra Modi government has decided to introduce the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (Amendment) Bill, 2015, in Lok Sabha today. The controversial Bill seeks approval of Parliament for changes brought in...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-Hindustan Times</div><p align="justify">The Narendra Modi government has decided to introduce the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (Amendment) Bill, 2015, in Lok Sabha today. The controversial Bill seeks approval of Parliament for changes brought in the law through an ordinance or emergency executive order in December 2014. The Bill will lapse on March 20, if it is not passed during this budget session that began on Monday. The Bill will sail through in the Lok Sabha where it has majority but the problem will lie in the Rajya Sabha where it does not have the numbers.</p><p align="justify">There are mainly two clauses that are contentious in the ordinance: Waiving off the consent clause and social impact assessment for public-private partnership projects and private companies.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The legislation leaves it vague and to the interpretation of the states, and it is not acceptable to the stakeholders. They want clearly stated provisions with no scope for ambiguity,&quot; a senior BJP leader told a national daily recently.</p><p align="justify">Whether the BJP agrees or not, the land bill has given the Opposition, which was down and out after the general elections of 2014, an issue to rally around, and it could turn out to be a costly mistake for the party in the long run.</p><p align="justify">On Monday, President Pranab Mukherjee said that the law has been suitably refined to protect farmers' interests during land acquisition for crucial public projects, the Opposition is not in a mood to relent. The Congress has already given a notice for suspension of Question Hour in the Upper House to discuss the ordinance. Party chief Sonia Gandhi on Monday said the President's speech had nothing new but was a rehash of UPA policies.</p><p align="justify">The Anna challenge</p><p align="justify">Outside Parliament, the NDA has another mega problem: Anti-corruption crusader and social activist Anna Hazare has launched a protest against the Bill. He will be joined by Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal and his two-day protest will be followed by a three to four month long 'padyatra' across the country to make people aware of the &quot;anti-farmer&quot; provisions made by the Centre in the ordinance.</p><p align="justify">There are many out there who think that Anna Hazare is a spent force but on an issue like this, it would be best not to underestimate him. He still has the cache to become the face of a public protest on an issue like this, which can be portrayed as an example of the &quot;nexus between the government and the corporate&quot; against the poor. In a poor country like India, where 60% of the people are dependent on land, this equation could be dangerous for any ruling party. In fact, the BJP would do well to remember how mishandling of the Anna agitation by the Congress had cost the party dear.</p><p align="justify">Hazare's protests in Jantar Mantar will also be joined by Ekta Parishad's PV Rajagopal who is leading a march from Palwal in Haryana and will reach Delhi today. This party too has been working on land rights for a long time and has deep roots in the agrarian community.</p><p align="justify">What about land reforms?</p><p align="justify">I am not surprised that the BJP is keen to tackle the land acquisition issue head on but its messaging on the issue has been extremely poor. It is also surprising that it has taken this &lsquo;my way or the highway' line on this sensitive issue because all along the government had been talking to different stakeholders about the Bill and it should have gauged the opposition to it by now. Even its own constituents have argued against the Bill.</p><p align="justify">The BJP could have played it differently by promising to undertake two projects that never took off after Independence: Land reforms and land distribution to the landless and homeless poor.</p><p align="justify">Equitable distribution of land has remained an unaccomplished task in India although most states had enacted land reform laws in the 1950s with the objectives of abolishing 'landlordism' and providing 'land to the tiller'.</p><p align="justify">The now-defunct Planning Commission had also identified lack of political will, inadequate land policy, legal and bureaucratic hurdles, litigation, lack of correct land records and weak administrative machinery responsible for zero movement on the issue.</p><p align="justify">The National Council for Land Reforms, which the UPA set up in 2008, is yet to meet even once. Prime Minister Modi as the chairman of the council could have revived the body and looked into this unfinished agenda instead of only putting all his weight behind the draconian land acquisition Bill, which a senior columnist has aptly called The Land Acquisition Forces (Special Powers) Act.</p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 27351, 'title' => 'A move that can backfire: Why BJP should not rush the land bill -KumKum Dasgupta', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -Hindustan Times </div> <p align="justify"> The Narendra Modi government has decided to introduce the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (Amendment) Bill, 2015, in Lok Sabha today. The controversial Bill seeks approval of Parliament for changes brought in the law through an ordinance or emergency executive order in December 2014. The Bill will lapse on March 20, if it is not passed during this budget session that began on Monday. The Bill will sail through in the Lok Sabha where it has majority but the problem will lie in the Rajya Sabha where it does not have the numbers. </p> <p align="justify"> There are mainly two clauses that are contentious in the ordinance: Waiving off the consent clause and social impact assessment for public-private partnership projects and private companies. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;The legislation leaves it vague and to the interpretation of the states, and it is not acceptable to the stakeholders. They want clearly stated provisions with no scope for ambiguity,&quot; a senior BJP leader told a national daily recently. </p> <p align="justify"> Whether the BJP agrees or not, the land bill has given the Opposition, which was down and out after the general elections of 2014, an issue to rally around, and it could turn out to be a costly mistake for the party in the long run. </p> <p align="justify"> On Monday, President Pranab Mukherjee said that the law has been suitably refined to protect farmers' interests during land acquisition for crucial public projects, the Opposition is not in a mood to relent. The Congress has already given a notice for suspension of Question Hour in the Upper House to discuss the ordinance. Party chief Sonia Gandhi on Monday said the President's speech had nothing new but was a rehash of UPA policies. </p> <p align="justify"> The Anna challenge </p> <p align="justify"> Outside Parliament, the NDA has another mega problem: Anti-corruption crusader and social activist Anna Hazare has launched a protest against the Bill. He will be joined by Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal and his two-day protest will be followed by a three to four month long 'padyatra' across the country to make people aware of the &quot;anti-farmer&quot; provisions made by the Centre in the ordinance. </p> <p align="justify"> There are many out there who think that Anna Hazare is a spent force but on an issue like this, it would be best not to underestimate him. He still has the cache to become the face of a public protest on an issue like this, which can be portrayed as an example of the &quot;nexus between the government and the corporate&quot; against the poor. In a poor country like India, where 60% of the people are dependent on land, this equation could be dangerous for any ruling party. In fact, the BJP would do well to remember how mishandling of the Anna agitation by the Congress had cost the party dear. </p> <p align="justify"> Hazare's protests in Jantar Mantar will also be joined by Ekta Parishad's PV Rajagopal who is leading a march from Palwal in Haryana and will reach Delhi today. This party too has been working on land rights for a long time and has deep roots in the agrarian community. </p> <p align="justify"> What about land reforms? </p> <p align="justify"> I am not surprised that the BJP is keen to tackle the land acquisition issue head on but its messaging on the issue has been extremely poor. It is also surprising that it has taken this &lsquo;my way or the highway' line on this sensitive issue because all along the government had been talking to different stakeholders about the Bill and it should have gauged the opposition to it by now. Even its own constituents have argued against the Bill. </p> <p align="justify"> The BJP could have played it differently by promising to undertake two projects that never took off after Independence: Land reforms and land distribution to the landless and homeless poor. </p> <p align="justify"> Equitable distribution of land has remained an unaccomplished task in India although most states had enacted land reform laws in the 1950s with the objectives of abolishing 'landlordism' and providing 'land to the tiller'. </p> <p align="justify"> The now-defunct Planning Commission had also identified lack of political will, inadequate land policy, legal and bureaucratic hurdles, litigation, lack of correct land records and weak administrative machinery responsible for zero movement on the issue. </p> <p align="justify"> The National Council for Land Reforms, which the UPA set up in 2008, is yet to meet even once. Prime Minister Modi as the chairman of the council could have revived the body and looked into this unfinished agenda instead of only putting all his weight behind the draconian land acquisition Bill, which a senior columnist has aptly called The Land Acquisition Forces (Special Powers) Act. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'Hindustan Times, 24 February, 2015, http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/a-move-that-can-backfire-why-bjp-should-not-rush-the-land-bill/article1-1319997.aspx', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'a-move-that-can-backfire-why-bjp-should-not-rush-the-land-bill-kumkum-dasgupta-4675402', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4675402, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 5 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 6 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 7 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 27351 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | A move that can backfire: Why BJP should not rush the land bill -KumKum Dasgupta' $metaKeywords = 'Land Ordinance,Social Impact Assessment,Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Rehabilitation and Resettlement law,land reforms,Land Distribution,Land Acquisition,Land Acquisition Act,land acquisition and rehabilitation' $metaDesc = ' -Hindustan Times The Narendra Modi government has decided to introduce the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (Amendment) Bill, 2015, in Lok Sabha today. The controversial Bill seeks approval of Parliament for changes brought in...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-Hindustan Times</div><p align="justify">The Narendra Modi government has decided to introduce the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (Amendment) Bill, 2015, in Lok Sabha today. The controversial Bill seeks approval of Parliament for changes brought in the law through an ordinance or emergency executive order in December 2014. The Bill will lapse on March 20, if it is not passed during this budget session that began on Monday. The Bill will sail through in the Lok Sabha where it has majority but the problem will lie in the Rajya Sabha where it does not have the numbers.</p><p align="justify">There are mainly two clauses that are contentious in the ordinance: Waiving off the consent clause and social impact assessment for public-private partnership projects and private companies.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The legislation leaves it vague and to the interpretation of the states, and it is not acceptable to the stakeholders. They want clearly stated provisions with no scope for ambiguity,&quot; a senior BJP leader told a national daily recently.</p><p align="justify">Whether the BJP agrees or not, the land bill has given the Opposition, which was down and out after the general elections of 2014, an issue to rally around, and it could turn out to be a costly mistake for the party in the long run.</p><p align="justify">On Monday, President Pranab Mukherjee said that the law has been suitably refined to protect farmers' interests during land acquisition for crucial public projects, the Opposition is not in a mood to relent. The Congress has already given a notice for suspension of Question Hour in the Upper House to discuss the ordinance. Party chief Sonia Gandhi on Monday said the President's speech had nothing new but was a rehash of UPA policies.</p><p align="justify">The Anna challenge</p><p align="justify">Outside Parliament, the NDA has another mega problem: Anti-corruption crusader and social activist Anna Hazare has launched a protest against the Bill. He will be joined by Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal and his two-day protest will be followed by a three to four month long 'padyatra' across the country to make people aware of the &quot;anti-farmer&quot; provisions made by the Centre in the ordinance.</p><p align="justify">There are many out there who think that Anna Hazare is a spent force but on an issue like this, it would be best not to underestimate him. He still has the cache to become the face of a public protest on an issue like this, which can be portrayed as an example of the &quot;nexus between the government and the corporate&quot; against the poor. In a poor country like India, where 60% of the people are dependent on land, this equation could be dangerous for any ruling party. In fact, the BJP would do well to remember how mishandling of the Anna agitation by the Congress had cost the party dear.</p><p align="justify">Hazare's protests in Jantar Mantar will also be joined by Ekta Parishad's PV Rajagopal who is leading a march from Palwal in Haryana and will reach Delhi today. This party too has been working on land rights for a long time and has deep roots in the agrarian community.</p><p align="justify">What about land reforms?</p><p align="justify">I am not surprised that the BJP is keen to tackle the land acquisition issue head on but its messaging on the issue has been extremely poor. It is also surprising that it has taken this &lsquo;my way or the highway' line on this sensitive issue because all along the government had been talking to different stakeholders about the Bill and it should have gauged the opposition to it by now. Even its own constituents have argued against the Bill.</p><p align="justify">The BJP could have played it differently by promising to undertake two projects that never took off after Independence: Land reforms and land distribution to the landless and homeless poor.</p><p align="justify">Equitable distribution of land has remained an unaccomplished task in India although most states had enacted land reform laws in the 1950s with the objectives of abolishing 'landlordism' and providing 'land to the tiller'.</p><p align="justify">The now-defunct Planning Commission had also identified lack of political will, inadequate land policy, legal and bureaucratic hurdles, litigation, lack of correct land records and weak administrative machinery responsible for zero movement on the issue.</p><p align="justify">The National Council for Land Reforms, which the UPA set up in 2008, is yet to meet even once. Prime Minister Modi as the chairman of the council could have revived the body and looked into this unfinished agenda instead of only putting all his weight behind the draconian land acquisition Bill, which a senior columnist has aptly called The Land Acquisition Forces (Special Powers) Act.</p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/a-move-that-can-backfire-why-bjp-should-not-rush-the-land-bill-kumkum-dasgupta-4675402.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | A move that can backfire: Why BJP should not rush the land bill -KumKum Dasgupta | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -Hindustan Times The Narendra Modi government has decided to introduce the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (Amendment) Bill, 2015, in Lok Sabha today. The controversial Bill seeks approval of Parliament for changes brought in..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>A move that can backfire: Why BJP should not rush the land bill -KumKum Dasgupta</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-Hindustan Times</div><p align="justify">The Narendra Modi government has decided to introduce the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (Amendment) Bill, 2015, in Lok Sabha today. The controversial Bill seeks approval of Parliament for changes brought in the law through an ordinance or emergency executive order in December 2014. The Bill will lapse on March 20, if it is not passed during this budget session that began on Monday. The Bill will sail through in the Lok Sabha where it has majority but the problem will lie in the Rajya Sabha where it does not have the numbers.</p><p align="justify">There are mainly two clauses that are contentious in the ordinance: Waiving off the consent clause and social impact assessment for public-private partnership projects and private companies.</p><p align="justify">"The legislation leaves it vague and to the interpretation of the states, and it is not acceptable to the stakeholders. They want clearly stated provisions with no scope for ambiguity," a senior BJP leader told a national daily recently.</p><p align="justify">Whether the BJP agrees or not, the land bill has given the Opposition, which was down and out after the general elections of 2014, an issue to rally around, and it could turn out to be a costly mistake for the party in the long run.</p><p align="justify">On Monday, President Pranab Mukherjee said that the law has been suitably refined to protect farmers' interests during land acquisition for crucial public projects, the Opposition is not in a mood to relent. The Congress has already given a notice for suspension of Question Hour in the Upper House to discuss the ordinance. Party chief Sonia Gandhi on Monday said the President's speech had nothing new but was a rehash of UPA policies.</p><p align="justify">The Anna challenge</p><p align="justify">Outside Parliament, the NDA has another mega problem: Anti-corruption crusader and social activist Anna Hazare has launched a protest against the Bill. He will be joined by Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal and his two-day protest will be followed by a three to four month long 'padyatra' across the country to make people aware of the "anti-farmer" provisions made by the Centre in the ordinance.</p><p align="justify">There are many out there who think that Anna Hazare is a spent force but on an issue like this, it would be best not to underestimate him. He still has the cache to become the face of a public protest on an issue like this, which can be portrayed as an example of the "nexus between the government and the corporate" against the poor. In a poor country like India, where 60% of the people are dependent on land, this equation could be dangerous for any ruling party. In fact, the BJP would do well to remember how mishandling of the Anna agitation by the Congress had cost the party dear.</p><p align="justify">Hazare's protests in Jantar Mantar will also be joined by Ekta Parishad's PV Rajagopal who is leading a march from Palwal in Haryana and will reach Delhi today. This party too has been working on land rights for a long time and has deep roots in the agrarian community.</p><p align="justify">What about land reforms?</p><p align="justify">I am not surprised that the BJP is keen to tackle the land acquisition issue head on but its messaging on the issue has been extremely poor. It is also surprising that it has taken this ‘my way or the highway' line on this sensitive issue because all along the government had been talking to different stakeholders about the Bill and it should have gauged the opposition to it by now. Even its own constituents have argued against the Bill.</p><p align="justify">The BJP could have played it differently by promising to undertake two projects that never took off after Independence: Land reforms and land distribution to the landless and homeless poor.</p><p align="justify">Equitable distribution of land has remained an unaccomplished task in India although most states had enacted land reform laws in the 1950s with the objectives of abolishing 'landlordism' and providing 'land to the tiller'.</p><p align="justify">The now-defunct Planning Commission had also identified lack of political will, inadequate land policy, legal and bureaucratic hurdles, litigation, lack of correct land records and weak administrative machinery responsible for zero movement on the issue.</p><p align="justify">The National Council for Land Reforms, which the UPA set up in 2008, is yet to meet even once. Prime Minister Modi as the chairman of the council could have revived the body and looked into this unfinished agenda instead of only putting all his weight behind the draconian land acquisition Bill, which a senior columnist has aptly called The Land Acquisition Forces (Special Powers) Act.</p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 27351, 'title' => 'A move that can backfire: Why BJP should not rush the land bill -KumKum Dasgupta', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -Hindustan Times </div> <p align="justify"> The Narendra Modi government has decided to introduce the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (Amendment) Bill, 2015, in Lok Sabha today. The controversial Bill seeks approval of Parliament for changes brought in the law through an ordinance or emergency executive order in December 2014. The Bill will lapse on March 20, if it is not passed during this budget session that began on Monday. The Bill will sail through in the Lok Sabha where it has majority but the problem will lie in the Rajya Sabha where it does not have the numbers. </p> <p align="justify"> There are mainly two clauses that are contentious in the ordinance: Waiving off the consent clause and social impact assessment for public-private partnership projects and private companies. </p> <p align="justify"> "The legislation leaves it vague and to the interpretation of the states, and it is not acceptable to the stakeholders. They want clearly stated provisions with no scope for ambiguity," a senior BJP leader told a national daily recently. </p> <p align="justify"> Whether the BJP agrees or not, the land bill has given the Opposition, which was down and out after the general elections of 2014, an issue to rally around, and it could turn out to be a costly mistake for the party in the long run. </p> <p align="justify"> On Monday, President Pranab Mukherjee said that the law has been suitably refined to protect farmers' interests during land acquisition for crucial public projects, the Opposition is not in a mood to relent. The Congress has already given a notice for suspension of Question Hour in the Upper House to discuss the ordinance. Party chief Sonia Gandhi on Monday said the President's speech had nothing new but was a rehash of UPA policies. </p> <p align="justify"> The Anna challenge </p> <p align="justify"> Outside Parliament, the NDA has another mega problem: Anti-corruption crusader and social activist Anna Hazare has launched a protest against the Bill. He will be joined by Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal and his two-day protest will be followed by a three to four month long 'padyatra' across the country to make people aware of the "anti-farmer" provisions made by the Centre in the ordinance. </p> <p align="justify"> There are many out there who think that Anna Hazare is a spent force but on an issue like this, it would be best not to underestimate him. He still has the cache to become the face of a public protest on an issue like this, which can be portrayed as an example of the "nexus between the government and the corporate" against the poor. In a poor country like India, where 60% of the people are dependent on land, this equation could be dangerous for any ruling party. In fact, the BJP would do well to remember how mishandling of the Anna agitation by the Congress had cost the party dear. </p> <p align="justify"> Hazare's protests in Jantar Mantar will also be joined by Ekta Parishad's PV Rajagopal who is leading a march from Palwal in Haryana and will reach Delhi today. This party too has been working on land rights for a long time and has deep roots in the agrarian community. </p> <p align="justify"> What about land reforms? </p> <p align="justify"> I am not surprised that the BJP is keen to tackle the land acquisition issue head on but its messaging on the issue has been extremely poor. It is also surprising that it has taken this ‘my way or the highway' line on this sensitive issue because all along the government had been talking to different stakeholders about the Bill and it should have gauged the opposition to it by now. Even its own constituents have argued against the Bill. </p> <p align="justify"> The BJP could have played it differently by promising to undertake two projects that never took off after Independence: Land reforms and land distribution to the landless and homeless poor. </p> <p align="justify"> Equitable distribution of land has remained an unaccomplished task in India although most states had enacted land reform laws in the 1950s with the objectives of abolishing 'landlordism' and providing 'land to the tiller'. </p> <p align="justify"> The now-defunct Planning Commission had also identified lack of political will, inadequate land policy, legal and bureaucratic hurdles, litigation, lack of correct land records and weak administrative machinery responsible for zero movement on the issue. </p> <p align="justify"> The National Council for Land Reforms, which the UPA set up in 2008, is yet to meet even once. Prime Minister Modi as the chairman of the council could have revived the body and looked into this unfinished agenda instead of only putting all his weight behind the draconian land acquisition Bill, which a senior columnist has aptly called The Land Acquisition Forces (Special Powers) Act. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'Hindustan Times, 24 February, 2015, http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/a-move-that-can-backfire-why-bjp-should-not-rush-the-land-bill/article1-1319997.aspx', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'a-move-that-can-backfire-why-bjp-should-not-rush-the-land-bill-kumkum-dasgupta-4675402', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4675402, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 27351, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | A move that can backfire: Why BJP should not rush the land bill -KumKum Dasgupta', 'metaKeywords' => 'Land Ordinance,Social Impact Assessment,Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Rehabilitation and Resettlement law,land reforms,Land Distribution,Land Acquisition,Land Acquisition Act,land acquisition and rehabilitation', 'metaDesc' => ' -Hindustan Times The Narendra Modi government has decided to introduce the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (Amendment) Bill, 2015, in Lok Sabha today. The controversial Bill seeks approval of Parliament for changes brought in...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-Hindustan Times</div><p align="justify">The Narendra Modi government has decided to introduce the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (Amendment) Bill, 2015, in Lok Sabha today. The controversial Bill seeks approval of Parliament for changes brought in the law through an ordinance or emergency executive order in December 2014. The Bill will lapse on March 20, if it is not passed during this budget session that began on Monday. The Bill will sail through in the Lok Sabha where it has majority but the problem will lie in the Rajya Sabha where it does not have the numbers.</p><p align="justify">There are mainly two clauses that are contentious in the ordinance: Waiving off the consent clause and social impact assessment for public-private partnership projects and private companies.</p><p align="justify">"The legislation leaves it vague and to the interpretation of the states, and it is not acceptable to the stakeholders. They want clearly stated provisions with no scope for ambiguity," a senior BJP leader told a national daily recently.</p><p align="justify">Whether the BJP agrees or not, the land bill has given the Opposition, which was down and out after the general elections of 2014, an issue to rally around, and it could turn out to be a costly mistake for the party in the long run.</p><p align="justify">On Monday, President Pranab Mukherjee said that the law has been suitably refined to protect farmers' interests during land acquisition for crucial public projects, the Opposition is not in a mood to relent. The Congress has already given a notice for suspension of Question Hour in the Upper House to discuss the ordinance. Party chief Sonia Gandhi on Monday said the President's speech had nothing new but was a rehash of UPA policies.</p><p align="justify">The Anna challenge</p><p align="justify">Outside Parliament, the NDA has another mega problem: Anti-corruption crusader and social activist Anna Hazare has launched a protest against the Bill. He will be joined by Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal and his two-day protest will be followed by a three to four month long 'padyatra' across the country to make people aware of the "anti-farmer" provisions made by the Centre in the ordinance.</p><p align="justify">There are many out there who think that Anna Hazare is a spent force but on an issue like this, it would be best not to underestimate him. He still has the cache to become the face of a public protest on an issue like this, which can be portrayed as an example of the "nexus between the government and the corporate" against the poor. In a poor country like India, where 60% of the people are dependent on land, this equation could be dangerous for any ruling party. In fact, the BJP would do well to remember how mishandling of the Anna agitation by the Congress had cost the party dear.</p><p align="justify">Hazare's protests in Jantar Mantar will also be joined by Ekta Parishad's PV Rajagopal who is leading a march from Palwal in Haryana and will reach Delhi today. This party too has been working on land rights for a long time and has deep roots in the agrarian community.</p><p align="justify">What about land reforms?</p><p align="justify">I am not surprised that the BJP is keen to tackle the land acquisition issue head on but its messaging on the issue has been extremely poor. It is also surprising that it has taken this ‘my way or the highway' line on this sensitive issue because all along the government had been talking to different stakeholders about the Bill and it should have gauged the opposition to it by now. Even its own constituents have argued against the Bill.</p><p align="justify">The BJP could have played it differently by promising to undertake two projects that never took off after Independence: Land reforms and land distribution to the landless and homeless poor.</p><p align="justify">Equitable distribution of land has remained an unaccomplished task in India although most states had enacted land reform laws in the 1950s with the objectives of abolishing 'landlordism' and providing 'land to the tiller'.</p><p align="justify">The now-defunct Planning Commission had also identified lack of political will, inadequate land policy, legal and bureaucratic hurdles, litigation, lack of correct land records and weak administrative machinery responsible for zero movement on the issue.</p><p align="justify">The National Council for Land Reforms, which the UPA set up in 2008, is yet to meet even once. Prime Minister Modi as the chairman of the council could have revived the body and looked into this unfinished agenda instead of only putting all his weight behind the draconian land acquisition Bill, which a senior columnist has aptly called The Land Acquisition Forces (Special Powers) Act.</p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 27351, 'title' => 'A move that can backfire: Why BJP should not rush the land bill -KumKum Dasgupta', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -Hindustan Times </div> <p align="justify"> The Narendra Modi government has decided to introduce the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (Amendment) Bill, 2015, in Lok Sabha today. The controversial Bill seeks approval of Parliament for changes brought in the law through an ordinance or emergency executive order in December 2014. The Bill will lapse on March 20, if it is not passed during this budget session that began on Monday. The Bill will sail through in the Lok Sabha where it has majority but the problem will lie in the Rajya Sabha where it does not have the numbers. </p> <p align="justify"> There are mainly two clauses that are contentious in the ordinance: Waiving off the consent clause and social impact assessment for public-private partnership projects and private companies. </p> <p align="justify"> "The legislation leaves it vague and to the interpretation of the states, and it is not acceptable to the stakeholders. They want clearly stated provisions with no scope for ambiguity," a senior BJP leader told a national daily recently. </p> <p align="justify"> Whether the BJP agrees or not, the land bill has given the Opposition, which was down and out after the general elections of 2014, an issue to rally around, and it could turn out to be a costly mistake for the party in the long run. </p> <p align="justify"> On Monday, President Pranab Mukherjee said that the law has been suitably refined to protect farmers' interests during land acquisition for crucial public projects, the Opposition is not in a mood to relent. The Congress has already given a notice for suspension of Question Hour in the Upper House to discuss the ordinance. Party chief Sonia Gandhi on Monday said the President's speech had nothing new but was a rehash of UPA policies. </p> <p align="justify"> The Anna challenge </p> <p align="justify"> Outside Parliament, the NDA has another mega problem: Anti-corruption crusader and social activist Anna Hazare has launched a protest against the Bill. He will be joined by Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal and his two-day protest will be followed by a three to four month long 'padyatra' across the country to make people aware of the "anti-farmer" provisions made by the Centre in the ordinance. </p> <p align="justify"> There are many out there who think that Anna Hazare is a spent force but on an issue like this, it would be best not to underestimate him. He still has the cache to become the face of a public protest on an issue like this, which can be portrayed as an example of the "nexus between the government and the corporate" against the poor. In a poor country like India, where 60% of the people are dependent on land, this equation could be dangerous for any ruling party. In fact, the BJP would do well to remember how mishandling of the Anna agitation by the Congress had cost the party dear. </p> <p align="justify"> Hazare's protests in Jantar Mantar will also be joined by Ekta Parishad's PV Rajagopal who is leading a march from Palwal in Haryana and will reach Delhi today. This party too has been working on land rights for a long time and has deep roots in the agrarian community. </p> <p align="justify"> What about land reforms? </p> <p align="justify"> I am not surprised that the BJP is keen to tackle the land acquisition issue head on but its messaging on the issue has been extremely poor. It is also surprising that it has taken this ‘my way or the highway' line on this sensitive issue because all along the government had been talking to different stakeholders about the Bill and it should have gauged the opposition to it by now. Even its own constituents have argued against the Bill. </p> <p align="justify"> The BJP could have played it differently by promising to undertake two projects that never took off after Independence: Land reforms and land distribution to the landless and homeless poor. </p> <p align="justify"> Equitable distribution of land has remained an unaccomplished task in India although most states had enacted land reform laws in the 1950s with the objectives of abolishing 'landlordism' and providing 'land to the tiller'. </p> <p align="justify"> The now-defunct Planning Commission had also identified lack of political will, inadequate land policy, legal and bureaucratic hurdles, litigation, lack of correct land records and weak administrative machinery responsible for zero movement on the issue. </p> <p align="justify"> The National Council for Land Reforms, which the UPA set up in 2008, is yet to meet even once. Prime Minister Modi as the chairman of the council could have revived the body and looked into this unfinished agenda instead of only putting all his weight behind the draconian land acquisition Bill, which a senior columnist has aptly called The Land Acquisition Forces (Special Powers) Act. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'Hindustan Times, 24 February, 2015, http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/a-move-that-can-backfire-why-bjp-should-not-rush-the-land-bill/article1-1319997.aspx', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'a-move-that-can-backfire-why-bjp-should-not-rush-the-land-bill-kumkum-dasgupta-4675402', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4675402, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 5 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 6 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 7 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 27351 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | A move that can backfire: Why BJP should not rush the land bill -KumKum Dasgupta' $metaKeywords = 'Land Ordinance,Social Impact Assessment,Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Rehabilitation and Resettlement law,land reforms,Land Distribution,Land Acquisition,Land Acquisition Act,land acquisition and rehabilitation' $metaDesc = ' -Hindustan Times The Narendra Modi government has decided to introduce the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (Amendment) Bill, 2015, in Lok Sabha today. The controversial Bill seeks approval of Parliament for changes brought in...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-Hindustan Times</div><p align="justify">The Narendra Modi government has decided to introduce the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (Amendment) Bill, 2015, in Lok Sabha today. The controversial Bill seeks approval of Parliament for changes brought in the law through an ordinance or emergency executive order in December 2014. The Bill will lapse on March 20, if it is not passed during this budget session that began on Monday. The Bill will sail through in the Lok Sabha where it has majority but the problem will lie in the Rajya Sabha where it does not have the numbers.</p><p align="justify">There are mainly two clauses that are contentious in the ordinance: Waiving off the consent clause and social impact assessment for public-private partnership projects and private companies.</p><p align="justify">"The legislation leaves it vague and to the interpretation of the states, and it is not acceptable to the stakeholders. They want clearly stated provisions with no scope for ambiguity," a senior BJP leader told a national daily recently.</p><p align="justify">Whether the BJP agrees or not, the land bill has given the Opposition, which was down and out after the general elections of 2014, an issue to rally around, and it could turn out to be a costly mistake for the party in the long run.</p><p align="justify">On Monday, President Pranab Mukherjee said that the law has been suitably refined to protect farmers' interests during land acquisition for crucial public projects, the Opposition is not in a mood to relent. The Congress has already given a notice for suspension of Question Hour in the Upper House to discuss the ordinance. Party chief Sonia Gandhi on Monday said the President's speech had nothing new but was a rehash of UPA policies.</p><p align="justify">The Anna challenge</p><p align="justify">Outside Parliament, the NDA has another mega problem: Anti-corruption crusader and social activist Anna Hazare has launched a protest against the Bill. He will be joined by Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal and his two-day protest will be followed by a three to four month long 'padyatra' across the country to make people aware of the "anti-farmer" provisions made by the Centre in the ordinance.</p><p align="justify">There are many out there who think that Anna Hazare is a spent force but on an issue like this, it would be best not to underestimate him. He still has the cache to become the face of a public protest on an issue like this, which can be portrayed as an example of the "nexus between the government and the corporate" against the poor. In a poor country like India, where 60% of the people are dependent on land, this equation could be dangerous for any ruling party. In fact, the BJP would do well to remember how mishandling of the Anna agitation by the Congress had cost the party dear.</p><p align="justify">Hazare's protests in Jantar Mantar will also be joined by Ekta Parishad's PV Rajagopal who is leading a march from Palwal in Haryana and will reach Delhi today. This party too has been working on land rights for a long time and has deep roots in the agrarian community.</p><p align="justify">What about land reforms?</p><p align="justify">I am not surprised that the BJP is keen to tackle the land acquisition issue head on but its messaging on the issue has been extremely poor. It is also surprising that it has taken this ‘my way or the highway' line on this sensitive issue because all along the government had been talking to different stakeholders about the Bill and it should have gauged the opposition to it by now. Even its own constituents have argued against the Bill.</p><p align="justify">The BJP could have played it differently by promising to undertake two projects that never took off after Independence: Land reforms and land distribution to the landless and homeless poor.</p><p align="justify">Equitable distribution of land has remained an unaccomplished task in India although most states had enacted land reform laws in the 1950s with the objectives of abolishing 'landlordism' and providing 'land to the tiller'.</p><p align="justify">The now-defunct Planning Commission had also identified lack of political will, inadequate land policy, legal and bureaucratic hurdles, litigation, lack of correct land records and weak administrative machinery responsible for zero movement on the issue.</p><p align="justify">The National Council for Land Reforms, which the UPA set up in 2008, is yet to meet even once. Prime Minister Modi as the chairman of the council could have revived the body and looked into this unfinished agenda instead of only putting all his weight behind the draconian land acquisition Bill, which a senior columnist has aptly called The Land Acquisition Forces (Special Powers) Act.</p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
A move that can backfire: Why BJP should not rush the land bill -KumKum Dasgupta |
-Hindustan Times The Narendra Modi government has decided to introduce the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (Amendment) Bill, 2015, in Lok Sabha today. The controversial Bill seeks approval of Parliament for changes brought in the law through an ordinance or emergency executive order in December 2014. The Bill will lapse on March 20, if it is not passed during this budget session that began on Monday. The Bill will sail through in the Lok Sabha where it has majority but the problem will lie in the Rajya Sabha where it does not have the numbers. There are mainly two clauses that are contentious in the ordinance: Waiving off the consent clause and social impact assessment for public-private partnership projects and private companies. "The legislation leaves it vague and to the interpretation of the states, and it is not acceptable to the stakeholders. They want clearly stated provisions with no scope for ambiguity," a senior BJP leader told a national daily recently. Whether the BJP agrees or not, the land bill has given the Opposition, which was down and out after the general elections of 2014, an issue to rally around, and it could turn out to be a costly mistake for the party in the long run. On Monday, President Pranab Mukherjee said that the law has been suitably refined to protect farmers' interests during land acquisition for crucial public projects, the Opposition is not in a mood to relent. The Congress has already given a notice for suspension of Question Hour in the Upper House to discuss the ordinance. Party chief Sonia Gandhi on Monday said the President's speech had nothing new but was a rehash of UPA policies. The Anna challenge Outside Parliament, the NDA has another mega problem: Anti-corruption crusader and social activist Anna Hazare has launched a protest against the Bill. He will be joined by Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal and his two-day protest will be followed by a three to four month long 'padyatra' across the country to make people aware of the "anti-farmer" provisions made by the Centre in the ordinance. There are many out there who think that Anna Hazare is a spent force but on an issue like this, it would be best not to underestimate him. He still has the cache to become the face of a public protest on an issue like this, which can be portrayed as an example of the "nexus between the government and the corporate" against the poor. In a poor country like India, where 60% of the people are dependent on land, this equation could be dangerous for any ruling party. In fact, the BJP would do well to remember how mishandling of the Anna agitation by the Congress had cost the party dear. Hazare's protests in Jantar Mantar will also be joined by Ekta Parishad's PV Rajagopal who is leading a march from Palwal in Haryana and will reach Delhi today. This party too has been working on land rights for a long time and has deep roots in the agrarian community. What about land reforms? I am not surprised that the BJP is keen to tackle the land acquisition issue head on but its messaging on the issue has been extremely poor. It is also surprising that it has taken this ‘my way or the highway' line on this sensitive issue because all along the government had been talking to different stakeholders about the Bill and it should have gauged the opposition to it by now. Even its own constituents have argued against the Bill. The BJP could have played it differently by promising to undertake two projects that never took off after Independence: Land reforms and land distribution to the landless and homeless poor. Equitable distribution of land has remained an unaccomplished task in India although most states had enacted land reform laws in the 1950s with the objectives of abolishing 'landlordism' and providing 'land to the tiller'. The now-defunct Planning Commission had also identified lack of political will, inadequate land policy, legal and bureaucratic hurdles, litigation, lack of correct land records and weak administrative machinery responsible for zero movement on the issue. The National Council for Land Reforms, which the UPA set up in 2008, is yet to meet even once. Prime Minister Modi as the chairman of the council could have revived the body and looked into this unfinished agenda instead of only putting all his weight behind the draconian land acquisition Bill, which a senior columnist has aptly called The Land Acquisition Forces (Special Powers) Act. |