Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/a-rural-safety-net-is-essential-in-india-4674230/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/a-rural-safety-net-is-essential-in-india-4674230/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/a-rural-safety-net-is-essential-in-india-4674230/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/a-rural-safety-net-is-essential-in-india-4674230/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9c5dd24666-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9c5dd24666-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f9c5dd24666-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9c5dd24666-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9c5dd24666-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9c5dd24666-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9c5dd24666-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f9c5dd24666-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f9c5dd24666-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 26192,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;A rural safety net is essential in India&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-Deccan Chronicle
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Under the stewardship of Union rural development minister Nitin Gadkari, things are looking far from good for the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, the 2005 law passed with cross-party support under UPA-1 that came to be hailed as the world&#039;s largest rural job guarantee scheme although, at home, some fair criticisms were also levelled at the way the project worked on the ground. The critics pointed to corruption and noted that contractors were pocketing money by padding muster rolls and giving the workers less than they were promised. A good deal of this was true.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
But it was equally noteworthy that the scheme gave employment to 50 million rural workers at a relatively small cost to the exchequer - something like 0.3 per cent of the GDP. Further, with the government&#039;s insistence on bank accounts being opened for workers (and this process has not fully matured), the money began to go directly to bank or post office accounts and that helped to reduce corruption.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
But Mr Gadkari, a businessman who did some construction work in Mumbai as a minister in Maharashtra, is not impressed with the employment aspect. He appears keen to reduce the financing of the employment component of the MGNREGA and increase the material component. This can only help contractors who are, in any case, known to drool at the prospect of being hired for infrastructure projects and other public works. Under the original law, 60 per cent of the financing was to go for wages and 40 for materials. Mr Gadkari has made known his intention to make this 51:49. In wishing to bring this about, he is reported to be overruling the top civil servants in his ministry who point out that five crore rural families will go to rack and ruin if deprived of wage employment under MGNREGA.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The scheme was originally meant to offer 100 days of guaranteed unskilled work to every rural household and the UPA had said it desired to push this up to 150 days. The NDA proposes to lower the employment period. In addition, it also seeks to withdraw the coverage of the scheme by about one-third. Social activists like Aruna Roy, who was a force behind the implementation of the MGNREGA are naturally disappointed with the rural development minister&#039;s cavalier attitude. They have written to the PM. In the end, the whole thing may turn on how large their campaign to save rural jobs turns out to be.
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;Deccan Chronicle, 16 October, 2014, http://www.deccanchronicle.com/141016/commentary-dc-comment/article/rural-safety-net-essential-india&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;a-rural-safety-net-is-essential-in-india-4674230&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4674230,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 26192,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | A rural safety net is essential in India&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Productive Assets,NREGA,mgnrega,Employment&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-Deccan Chronicle


Under the stewardship of Union rural development minister Nitin Gadkari, things are looking far from good for the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, the 2005 law passed with cross-party support under UPA-1 that came to be hailed...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-Deccan Chronicle&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Under the stewardship of Union rural development minister Nitin Gadkari, things are looking far from good for the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, the 2005 law passed with cross-party support under UPA-1 that came to be hailed as the world&#039;s largest rural job guarantee scheme although, at home, some fair criticisms were also levelled at the way the project worked on the ground. The critics pointed to corruption and noted that contractors were pocketing money by padding muster rolls and giving the workers less than they were promised. A good deal of this was true.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;But it was equally noteworthy that the scheme gave employment to 50 million rural workers at a relatively small cost to the exchequer - something like 0.3 per cent of the GDP. Further, with the government&#039;s insistence on bank accounts being opened for workers (and this process has not fully matured), the money began to go directly to bank or post office accounts and that helped to reduce corruption.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;But Mr Gadkari, a businessman who did some construction work in Mumbai as a minister in Maharashtra, is not impressed with the employment aspect. He appears keen to reduce the financing of the employment component of the MGNREGA and increase the material component. This can only help contractors who are, in any case, known to drool at the prospect of being hired for infrastructure projects and other public works. Under the original law, 60 per cent of the financing was to go for wages and 40 for materials. Mr Gadkari has made known his intention to make this 51:49. In wishing to bring this about, he is reported to be overruling the top civil servants in his ministry who point out that five crore rural families will go to rack and ruin if deprived of wage employment under MGNREGA.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The scheme was originally meant to offer 100 days of guaranteed unskilled work to every rural household and the UPA had said it desired to push this up to 150 days. The NDA proposes to lower the employment period. In addition, it also seeks to withdraw the coverage of the scheme by about one-third. Social activists like Aruna Roy, who was a force behind the implementation of the MGNREGA are naturally disappointed with the rural development minister&#039;s cavalier attitude. They have written to the PM. In the end, the whole thing may turn on how large their campaign to save rural jobs turns out to be.&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 26192,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;A rural safety net is essential in India&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-Deccan Chronicle
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Under the stewardship of Union rural development minister Nitin Gadkari, things are looking far from good for the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, the 2005 law passed with cross-party support under UPA-1 that came to be hailed as the world&#039;s largest rural job guarantee scheme although, at home, some fair criticisms were also levelled at the way the project worked on the ground. The critics pointed to corruption and noted that contractors were pocketing money by padding muster rolls and giving the workers less than they were promised. A good deal of this was true.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
But it was equally noteworthy that the scheme gave employment to 50 million rural workers at a relatively small cost to the exchequer - something like 0.3 per cent of the GDP. Further, with the government&#039;s insistence on bank accounts being opened for workers (and this process has not fully matured), the money began to go directly to bank or post office accounts and that helped to reduce corruption.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
But Mr Gadkari, a businessman who did some construction work in Mumbai as a minister in Maharashtra, is not impressed with the employment aspect. He appears keen to reduce the financing of the employment component of the MGNREGA and increase the material component. This can only help contractors who are, in any case, known to drool at the prospect of being hired for infrastructure projects and other public works. Under the original law, 60 per cent of the financing was to go for wages and 40 for materials. Mr Gadkari has made known his intention to make this 51:49. In wishing to bring this about, he is reported to be overruling the top civil servants in his ministry who point out that five crore rural families will go to rack and ruin if deprived of wage employment under MGNREGA.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The scheme was originally meant to offer 100 days of guaranteed unskilled work to every rural household and the UPA had said it desired to push this up to 150 days. The NDA proposes to lower the employment period. In addition, it also seeks to withdraw the coverage of the scheme by about one-third. Social activists like Aruna Roy, who was a force behind the implementation of the MGNREGA are naturally disappointed with the rural development minister&#039;s cavalier attitude. They have written to the PM. In the end, the whole thing may turn on how large their campaign to save rural jobs turns out to be.
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;Deccan Chronicle, 16 October, 2014, http://www.deccanchronicle.com/141016/commentary-dc-comment/article/rural-safety-net-essential-india&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;a-rural-safety-net-is-essential-in-india-4674230&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4674230,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 26192
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | A rural safety net is essential in India&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Productive Assets,NREGA,mgnrega,Employment&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-Deccan Chronicle


Under the stewardship of Union rural development minister Nitin Gadkari, things are looking far from good for the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, the 2005 law passed with cross-party support under UPA-1 that came to be hailed...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-Deccan Chronicle&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Under the stewardship of Union rural development minister Nitin Gadkari, things are looking far from good for the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, the 2005 law passed with cross-party support under UPA-1 that came to be hailed as the world&#039;s largest rural job guarantee scheme although, at home, some fair criticisms were also levelled at the way the project worked on the ground. The critics pointed to corruption and noted that contractors were pocketing money by padding muster rolls and giving the workers less than they were promised. A good deal of this was true.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;But it was equally noteworthy that the scheme gave employment to 50 million rural workers at a relatively small cost to the exchequer - something like 0.3 per cent of the GDP. Further, with the government&#039;s insistence on bank accounts being opened for workers (and this process has not fully matured), the money began to go directly to bank or post office accounts and that helped to reduce corruption.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;But Mr Gadkari, a businessman who did some construction work in Mumbai as a minister in Maharashtra, is not impressed with the employment aspect. He appears keen to reduce the financing of the employment component of the MGNREGA and increase the material component. This can only help contractors who are, in any case, known to drool at the prospect of being hired for infrastructure projects and other public works. Under the original law, 60 per cent of the financing was to go for wages and 40 for materials. Mr Gadkari has made known his intention to make this 51:49. In wishing to bring this about, he is reported to be overruling the top civil servants in his ministry who point out that five crore rural families will go to rack and ruin if deprived of wage employment under MGNREGA.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The scheme was originally meant to offer 100 days of guaranteed unskilled work to every rural household and the UPA had said it desired to push this up to 150 days. The NDA proposes to lower the employment period. In addition, it also seeks to withdraw the coverage of the scheme by about one-third. Social activists like Aruna Roy, who was a force behind the implementation of the MGNREGA are naturally disappointed with the rural development minister&#039;s cavalier attitude. They have written to the PM. In the end, the whole thing may turn on how large their campaign to save rural jobs turns out to be.&lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/a-rural-safety-net-is-essential-in-india-4674230.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | A rural safety net is essential in India | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-Deccan Chronicle


Under the stewardship of Union rural development minister Nitin Gadkari, things are looking far from good for the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, the 2005 law passed with cross-party support under UPA-1 that came to be hailed..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>A rural safety net is essential in India</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-Deccan Chronicle</div><p align="justify">Under the stewardship of Union rural development minister Nitin Gadkari, things are looking far from good for the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, the 2005 law passed with cross-party support under UPA-1 that came to be hailed as the world's largest rural job guarantee scheme although, at home, some fair criticisms were also levelled at the way the project worked on the ground. The critics pointed to corruption and noted that contractors were pocketing money by padding muster rolls and giving the workers less than they were promised. A good deal of this was true.</p><p align="justify">But it was equally noteworthy that the scheme gave employment to 50 million rural workers at a relatively small cost to the exchequer - something like 0.3 per cent of the GDP. Further, with the government's insistence on bank accounts being opened for workers (and this process has not fully matured), the money began to go directly to bank or post office accounts and that helped to reduce corruption.</p><p align="justify">But Mr Gadkari, a businessman who did some construction work in Mumbai as a minister in Maharashtra, is not impressed with the employment aspect. He appears keen to reduce the financing of the employment component of the MGNREGA and increase the material component. This can only help contractors who are, in any case, known to drool at the prospect of being hired for infrastructure projects and other public works. Under the original law, 60 per cent of the financing was to go for wages and 40 for materials. Mr Gadkari has made known his intention to make this 51:49. In wishing to bring this about, he is reported to be overruling the top civil servants in his ministry who point out that five crore rural families will go to rack and ruin if deprived of wage employment under MGNREGA.</p><p align="justify">The scheme was originally meant to offer 100 days of guaranteed unskilled work to every rural household and the UPA had said it desired to push this up to 150 days. The NDA proposes to lower the employment period. In addition, it also seeks to withdraw the coverage of the scheme by about one-third. Social activists like Aruna Roy, who was a force behind the implementation of the MGNREGA are naturally disappointed with the rural development minister's cavalier attitude. They have written to the PM. In the end, the whole thing may turn on how large their campaign to save rural jobs turns out to be.</p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9c5dd24666-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9c5dd24666-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f9c5dd24666-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9c5dd24666-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9c5dd24666-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9c5dd24666-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9c5dd24666-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f9c5dd24666-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f9c5dd24666-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 26192,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;A rural safety net is essential in India&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-Deccan Chronicle
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Under the stewardship of Union rural development minister Nitin Gadkari, things are looking far from good for the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, the 2005 law passed with cross-party support under UPA-1 that came to be hailed as the world&#039;s largest rural job guarantee scheme although, at home, some fair criticisms were also levelled at the way the project worked on the ground. The critics pointed to corruption and noted that contractors were pocketing money by padding muster rolls and giving the workers less than they were promised. A good deal of this was true.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
But it was equally noteworthy that the scheme gave employment to 50 million rural workers at a relatively small cost to the exchequer - something like 0.3 per cent of the GDP. Further, with the government&#039;s insistence on bank accounts being opened for workers (and this process has not fully matured), the money began to go directly to bank or post office accounts and that helped to reduce corruption.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
But Mr Gadkari, a businessman who did some construction work in Mumbai as a minister in Maharashtra, is not impressed with the employment aspect. He appears keen to reduce the financing of the employment component of the MGNREGA and increase the material component. This can only help contractors who are, in any case, known to drool at the prospect of being hired for infrastructure projects and other public works. Under the original law, 60 per cent of the financing was to go for wages and 40 for materials. Mr Gadkari has made known his intention to make this 51:49. In wishing to bring this about, he is reported to be overruling the top civil servants in his ministry who point out that five crore rural families will go to rack and ruin if deprived of wage employment under MGNREGA.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The scheme was originally meant to offer 100 days of guaranteed unskilled work to every rural household and the UPA had said it desired to push this up to 150 days. The NDA proposes to lower the employment period. In addition, it also seeks to withdraw the coverage of the scheme by about one-third. Social activists like Aruna Roy, who was a force behind the implementation of the MGNREGA are naturally disappointed with the rural development minister&#039;s cavalier attitude. They have written to the PM. In the end, the whole thing may turn on how large their campaign to save rural jobs turns out to be.
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;Deccan Chronicle, 16 October, 2014, http://www.deccanchronicle.com/141016/commentary-dc-comment/article/rural-safety-net-essential-india&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;a-rural-safety-net-is-essential-in-india-4674230&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4674230,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 26192,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | A rural safety net is essential in India&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Productive Assets,NREGA,mgnrega,Employment&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-Deccan Chronicle


Under the stewardship of Union rural development minister Nitin Gadkari, things are looking far from good for the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, the 2005 law passed with cross-party support under UPA-1 that came to be hailed...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-Deccan Chronicle&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Under the stewardship of Union rural development minister Nitin Gadkari, things are looking far from good for the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, the 2005 law passed with cross-party support under UPA-1 that came to be hailed as the world&#039;s largest rural job guarantee scheme although, at home, some fair criticisms were also levelled at the way the project worked on the ground. The critics pointed to corruption and noted that contractors were pocketing money by padding muster rolls and giving the workers less than they were promised. A good deal of this was true.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;But it was equally noteworthy that the scheme gave employment to 50 million rural workers at a relatively small cost to the exchequer - something like 0.3 per cent of the GDP. Further, with the government&#039;s insistence on bank accounts being opened for workers (and this process has not fully matured), the money began to go directly to bank or post office accounts and that helped to reduce corruption.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;But Mr Gadkari, a businessman who did some construction work in Mumbai as a minister in Maharashtra, is not impressed with the employment aspect. He appears keen to reduce the financing of the employment component of the MGNREGA and increase the material component. This can only help contractors who are, in any case, known to drool at the prospect of being hired for infrastructure projects and other public works. Under the original law, 60 per cent of the financing was to go for wages and 40 for materials. Mr Gadkari has made known his intention to make this 51:49. In wishing to bring this about, he is reported to be overruling the top civil servants in his ministry who point out that five crore rural families will go to rack and ruin if deprived of wage employment under MGNREGA.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The scheme was originally meant to offer 100 days of guaranteed unskilled work to every rural household and the UPA had said it desired to push this up to 150 days. The NDA proposes to lower the employment period. In addition, it also seeks to withdraw the coverage of the scheme by about one-third. Social activists like Aruna Roy, who was a force behind the implementation of the MGNREGA are naturally disappointed with the rural development minister&#039;s cavalier attitude. They have written to the PM. In the end, the whole thing may turn on how large their campaign to save rural jobs turns out to be.&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 26192,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;A rural safety net is essential in India&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-Deccan Chronicle
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Under the stewardship of Union rural development minister Nitin Gadkari, things are looking far from good for the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, the 2005 law passed with cross-party support under UPA-1 that came to be hailed as the world&#039;s largest rural job guarantee scheme although, at home, some fair criticisms were also levelled at the way the project worked on the ground. The critics pointed to corruption and noted that contractors were pocketing money by padding muster rolls and giving the workers less than they were promised. A good deal of this was true.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
But it was equally noteworthy that the scheme gave employment to 50 million rural workers at a relatively small cost to the exchequer - something like 0.3 per cent of the GDP. Further, with the government&#039;s insistence on bank accounts being opened for workers (and this process has not fully matured), the money began to go directly to bank or post office accounts and that helped to reduce corruption.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
But Mr Gadkari, a businessman who did some construction work in Mumbai as a minister in Maharashtra, is not impressed with the employment aspect. He appears keen to reduce the financing of the employment component of the MGNREGA and increase the material component. This can only help contractors who are, in any case, known to drool at the prospect of being hired for infrastructure projects and other public works. Under the original law, 60 per cent of the financing was to go for wages and 40 for materials. Mr Gadkari has made known his intention to make this 51:49. In wishing to bring this about, he is reported to be overruling the top civil servants in his ministry who point out that five crore rural families will go to rack and ruin if deprived of wage employment under MGNREGA.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The scheme was originally meant to offer 100 days of guaranteed unskilled work to every rural household and the UPA had said it desired to push this up to 150 days. The NDA proposes to lower the employment period. In addition, it also seeks to withdraw the coverage of the scheme by about one-third. Social activists like Aruna Roy, who was a force behind the implementation of the MGNREGA are naturally disappointed with the rural development minister&#039;s cavalier attitude. They have written to the PM. In the end, the whole thing may turn on how large their campaign to save rural jobs turns out to be.
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;Deccan Chronicle, 16 October, 2014, http://www.deccanchronicle.com/141016/commentary-dc-comment/article/rural-safety-net-essential-india&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;a-rural-safety-net-is-essential-in-india-4674230&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4674230,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 26192
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | A rural safety net is essential in India&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Productive Assets,NREGA,mgnrega,Employment&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-Deccan Chronicle


Under the stewardship of Union rural development minister Nitin Gadkari, things are looking far from good for the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, the 2005 law passed with cross-party support under UPA-1 that came to be hailed...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-Deccan Chronicle&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Under the stewardship of Union rural development minister Nitin Gadkari, things are looking far from good for the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, the 2005 law passed with cross-party support under UPA-1 that came to be hailed as the world&#039;s largest rural job guarantee scheme although, at home, some fair criticisms were also levelled at the way the project worked on the ground. The critics pointed to corruption and noted that contractors were pocketing money by padding muster rolls and giving the workers less than they were promised. A good deal of this was true.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;But it was equally noteworthy that the scheme gave employment to 50 million rural workers at a relatively small cost to the exchequer - something like 0.3 per cent of the GDP. Further, with the government&#039;s insistence on bank accounts being opened for workers (and this process has not fully matured), the money began to go directly to bank or post office accounts and that helped to reduce corruption.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;But Mr Gadkari, a businessman who did some construction work in Mumbai as a minister in Maharashtra, is not impressed with the employment aspect. He appears keen to reduce the financing of the employment component of the MGNREGA and increase the material component. This can only help contractors who are, in any case, known to drool at the prospect of being hired for infrastructure projects and other public works. Under the original law, 60 per cent of the financing was to go for wages and 40 for materials. Mr Gadkari has made known his intention to make this 51:49. In wishing to bring this about, he is reported to be overruling the top civil servants in his ministry who point out that five crore rural families will go to rack and ruin if deprived of wage employment under MGNREGA.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The scheme was originally meant to offer 100 days of guaranteed unskilled work to every rural household and the UPA had said it desired to push this up to 150 days. The NDA proposes to lower the employment period. In addition, it also seeks to withdraw the coverage of the scheme by about one-third. Social activists like Aruna Roy, who was a force behind the implementation of the MGNREGA are naturally disappointed with the rural development minister&#039;s cavalier attitude. They have written to the PM. In the end, the whole thing may turn on how large their campaign to save rural jobs turns out to be.&lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/a-rural-safety-net-is-essential-in-india-4674230.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | A rural safety net is essential in India | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-Deccan Chronicle


Under the stewardship of Union rural development minister Nitin Gadkari, things are looking far from good for the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, the 2005 law passed with cross-party support under UPA-1 that came to be hailed..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>A rural safety net is essential in India</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-Deccan Chronicle</div><p align="justify">Under the stewardship of Union rural development minister Nitin Gadkari, things are looking far from good for the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, the 2005 law passed with cross-party support under UPA-1 that came to be hailed as the world's largest rural job guarantee scheme although, at home, some fair criticisms were also levelled at the way the project worked on the ground. The critics pointed to corruption and noted that contractors were pocketing money by padding muster rolls and giving the workers less than they were promised. A good deal of this was true.</p><p align="justify">But it was equally noteworthy that the scheme gave employment to 50 million rural workers at a relatively small cost to the exchequer - something like 0.3 per cent of the GDP. Further, with the government's insistence on bank accounts being opened for workers (and this process has not fully matured), the money began to go directly to bank or post office accounts and that helped to reduce corruption.</p><p align="justify">But Mr Gadkari, a businessman who did some construction work in Mumbai as a minister in Maharashtra, is not impressed with the employment aspect. He appears keen to reduce the financing of the employment component of the MGNREGA and increase the material component. This can only help contractors who are, in any case, known to drool at the prospect of being hired for infrastructure projects and other public works. Under the original law, 60 per cent of the financing was to go for wages and 40 for materials. Mr Gadkari has made known his intention to make this 51:49. In wishing to bring this about, he is reported to be overruling the top civil servants in his ministry who point out that five crore rural families will go to rack and ruin if deprived of wage employment under MGNREGA.</p><p align="justify">The scheme was originally meant to offer 100 days of guaranteed unskilled work to every rural household and the UPA had said it desired to push this up to 150 days. The NDA proposes to lower the employment period. In addition, it also seeks to withdraw the coverage of the scheme by about one-third. Social activists like Aruna Roy, who was a force behind the implementation of the MGNREGA are naturally disappointed with the rural development minister's cavalier attitude. They have written to the PM. In the end, the whole thing may turn on how large their campaign to save rural jobs turns out to be.</p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9c5dd24666-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9c5dd24666-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f9c5dd24666-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9c5dd24666-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9c5dd24666-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9c5dd24666-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9c5dd24666-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f9c5dd24666-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f9c5dd24666-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 26192,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;A rural safety net is essential in India&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-Deccan Chronicle
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Under the stewardship of Union rural development minister Nitin Gadkari, things are looking far from good for the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, the 2005 law passed with cross-party support under UPA-1 that came to be hailed as the world&#039;s largest rural job guarantee scheme although, at home, some fair criticisms were also levelled at the way the project worked on the ground. The critics pointed to corruption and noted that contractors were pocketing money by padding muster rolls and giving the workers less than they were promised. A good deal of this was true.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
But it was equally noteworthy that the scheme gave employment to 50 million rural workers at a relatively small cost to the exchequer - something like 0.3 per cent of the GDP. Further, with the government&#039;s insistence on bank accounts being opened for workers (and this process has not fully matured), the money began to go directly to bank or post office accounts and that helped to reduce corruption.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
But Mr Gadkari, a businessman who did some construction work in Mumbai as a minister in Maharashtra, is not impressed with the employment aspect. He appears keen to reduce the financing of the employment component of the MGNREGA and increase the material component. This can only help contractors who are, in any case, known to drool at the prospect of being hired for infrastructure projects and other public works. Under the original law, 60 per cent of the financing was to go for wages and 40 for materials. Mr Gadkari has made known his intention to make this 51:49. In wishing to bring this about, he is reported to be overruling the top civil servants in his ministry who point out that five crore rural families will go to rack and ruin if deprived of wage employment under MGNREGA.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The scheme was originally meant to offer 100 days of guaranteed unskilled work to every rural household and the UPA had said it desired to push this up to 150 days. The NDA proposes to lower the employment period. In addition, it also seeks to withdraw the coverage of the scheme by about one-third. Social activists like Aruna Roy, who was a force behind the implementation of the MGNREGA are naturally disappointed with the rural development minister&#039;s cavalier attitude. They have written to the PM. In the end, the whole thing may turn on how large their campaign to save rural jobs turns out to be.
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;Deccan Chronicle, 16 October, 2014, http://www.deccanchronicle.com/141016/commentary-dc-comment/article/rural-safety-net-essential-india&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;a-rural-safety-net-is-essential-in-india-4674230&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4674230,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 26192,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | A rural safety net is essential in India&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Productive Assets,NREGA,mgnrega,Employment&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-Deccan Chronicle


Under the stewardship of Union rural development minister Nitin Gadkari, things are looking far from good for the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, the 2005 law passed with cross-party support under UPA-1 that came to be hailed...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-Deccan Chronicle&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Under the stewardship of Union rural development minister Nitin Gadkari, things are looking far from good for the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, the 2005 law passed with cross-party support under UPA-1 that came to be hailed as the world&#039;s largest rural job guarantee scheme although, at home, some fair criticisms were also levelled at the way the project worked on the ground. The critics pointed to corruption and noted that contractors were pocketing money by padding muster rolls and giving the workers less than they were promised. A good deal of this was true.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;But it was equally noteworthy that the scheme gave employment to 50 million rural workers at a relatively small cost to the exchequer - something like 0.3 per cent of the GDP. Further, with the government&#039;s insistence on bank accounts being opened for workers (and this process has not fully matured), the money began to go directly to bank or post office accounts and that helped to reduce corruption.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;But Mr Gadkari, a businessman who did some construction work in Mumbai as a minister in Maharashtra, is not impressed with the employment aspect. He appears keen to reduce the financing of the employment component of the MGNREGA and increase the material component. This can only help contractors who are, in any case, known to drool at the prospect of being hired for infrastructure projects and other public works. Under the original law, 60 per cent of the financing was to go for wages and 40 for materials. Mr Gadkari has made known his intention to make this 51:49. In wishing to bring this about, he is reported to be overruling the top civil servants in his ministry who point out that five crore rural families will go to rack and ruin if deprived of wage employment under MGNREGA.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The scheme was originally meant to offer 100 days of guaranteed unskilled work to every rural household and the UPA had said it desired to push this up to 150 days. The NDA proposes to lower the employment period. In addition, it also seeks to withdraw the coverage of the scheme by about one-third. Social activists like Aruna Roy, who was a force behind the implementation of the MGNREGA are naturally disappointed with the rural development minister&#039;s cavalier attitude. They have written to the PM. In the end, the whole thing may turn on how large their campaign to save rural jobs turns out to be.&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 26192,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;A rural safety net is essential in India&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-Deccan Chronicle
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Under the stewardship of Union rural development minister Nitin Gadkari, things are looking far from good for the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, the 2005 law passed with cross-party support under UPA-1 that came to be hailed as the world&#039;s largest rural job guarantee scheme although, at home, some fair criticisms were also levelled at the way the project worked on the ground. The critics pointed to corruption and noted that contractors were pocketing money by padding muster rolls and giving the workers less than they were promised. A good deal of this was true.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
But it was equally noteworthy that the scheme gave employment to 50 million rural workers at a relatively small cost to the exchequer - something like 0.3 per cent of the GDP. Further, with the government&#039;s insistence on bank accounts being opened for workers (and this process has not fully matured), the money began to go directly to bank or post office accounts and that helped to reduce corruption.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
But Mr Gadkari, a businessman who did some construction work in Mumbai as a minister in Maharashtra, is not impressed with the employment aspect. He appears keen to reduce the financing of the employment component of the MGNREGA and increase the material component. This can only help contractors who are, in any case, known to drool at the prospect of being hired for infrastructure projects and other public works. Under the original law, 60 per cent of the financing was to go for wages and 40 for materials. Mr Gadkari has made known his intention to make this 51:49. In wishing to bring this about, he is reported to be overruling the top civil servants in his ministry who point out that five crore rural families will go to rack and ruin if deprived of wage employment under MGNREGA.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The scheme was originally meant to offer 100 days of guaranteed unskilled work to every rural household and the UPA had said it desired to push this up to 150 days. The NDA proposes to lower the employment period. In addition, it also seeks to withdraw the coverage of the scheme by about one-third. Social activists like Aruna Roy, who was a force behind the implementation of the MGNREGA are naturally disappointed with the rural development minister&#039;s cavalier attitude. They have written to the PM. In the end, the whole thing may turn on how large their campaign to save rural jobs turns out to be.
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;Deccan Chronicle, 16 October, 2014, http://www.deccanchronicle.com/141016/commentary-dc-comment/article/rural-safety-net-essential-india&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;a-rural-safety-net-is-essential-in-india-4674230&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4674230,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 26192
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | A rural safety net is essential in India&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Productive Assets,NREGA,mgnrega,Employment&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-Deccan Chronicle


Under the stewardship of Union rural development minister Nitin Gadkari, things are looking far from good for the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, the 2005 law passed with cross-party support under UPA-1 that came to be hailed...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-Deccan Chronicle&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Under the stewardship of Union rural development minister Nitin Gadkari, things are looking far from good for the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, the 2005 law passed with cross-party support under UPA-1 that came to be hailed as the world&#039;s largest rural job guarantee scheme although, at home, some fair criticisms were also levelled at the way the project worked on the ground. The critics pointed to corruption and noted that contractors were pocketing money by padding muster rolls and giving the workers less than they were promised. A good deal of this was true.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;But it was equally noteworthy that the scheme gave employment to 50 million rural workers at a relatively small cost to the exchequer - something like 0.3 per cent of the GDP. Further, with the government&#039;s insistence on bank accounts being opened for workers (and this process has not fully matured), the money began to go directly to bank or post office accounts and that helped to reduce corruption.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;But Mr Gadkari, a businessman who did some construction work in Mumbai as a minister in Maharashtra, is not impressed with the employment aspect. He appears keen to reduce the financing of the employment component of the MGNREGA and increase the material component. This can only help contractors who are, in any case, known to drool at the prospect of being hired for infrastructure projects and other public works. Under the original law, 60 per cent of the financing was to go for wages and 40 for materials. Mr Gadkari has made known his intention to make this 51:49. In wishing to bring this about, he is reported to be overruling the top civil servants in his ministry who point out that five crore rural families will go to rack and ruin if deprived of wage employment under MGNREGA.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The scheme was originally meant to offer 100 days of guaranteed unskilled work to every rural household and the UPA had said it desired to push this up to 150 days. The NDA proposes to lower the employment period. In addition, it also seeks to withdraw the coverage of the scheme by about one-third. Social activists like Aruna Roy, who was a force behind the implementation of the MGNREGA are naturally disappointed with the rural development minister&#039;s cavalier attitude. They have written to the PM. In the end, the whole thing may turn on how large their campaign to save rural jobs turns out to be.&lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/a-rural-safety-net-is-essential-in-india-4674230.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | A rural safety net is essential in India | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-Deccan Chronicle


Under the stewardship of Union rural development minister Nitin Gadkari, things are looking far from good for the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, the 2005 law passed with cross-party support under UPA-1 that came to be hailed..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>A rural safety net is essential in India</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-Deccan Chronicle</div><p align="justify">Under the stewardship of Union rural development minister Nitin Gadkari, things are looking far from good for the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, the 2005 law passed with cross-party support under UPA-1 that came to be hailed as the world's largest rural job guarantee scheme although, at home, some fair criticisms were also levelled at the way the project worked on the ground. The critics pointed to corruption and noted that contractors were pocketing money by padding muster rolls and giving the workers less than they were promised. A good deal of this was true.</p><p align="justify">But it was equally noteworthy that the scheme gave employment to 50 million rural workers at a relatively small cost to the exchequer - something like 0.3 per cent of the GDP. Further, with the government's insistence on bank accounts being opened for workers (and this process has not fully matured), the money began to go directly to bank or post office accounts and that helped to reduce corruption.</p><p align="justify">But Mr Gadkari, a businessman who did some construction work in Mumbai as a minister in Maharashtra, is not impressed with the employment aspect. He appears keen to reduce the financing of the employment component of the MGNREGA and increase the material component. This can only help contractors who are, in any case, known to drool at the prospect of being hired for infrastructure projects and other public works. Under the original law, 60 per cent of the financing was to go for wages and 40 for materials. Mr Gadkari has made known his intention to make this 51:49. In wishing to bring this about, he is reported to be overruling the top civil servants in his ministry who point out that five crore rural families will go to rack and ruin if deprived of wage employment under MGNREGA.</p><p align="justify">The scheme was originally meant to offer 100 days of guaranteed unskilled work to every rural household and the UPA had said it desired to push this up to 150 days. The NDA proposes to lower the employment period. In addition, it also seeks to withdraw the coverage of the scheme by about one-third. Social activists like Aruna Roy, who was a force behind the implementation of the MGNREGA are naturally disappointed with the rural development minister's cavalier attitude. They have written to the PM. In the end, the whole thing may turn on how large their campaign to save rural jobs turns out to be.</p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 26192,
		'title' => 'A rural safety net is essential in India',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<div align="justify">
-Deccan Chronicle
</div>
<p align="justify">
Under the stewardship of Union rural development minister Nitin Gadkari, things are looking far from good for the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, the 2005 law passed with cross-party support under UPA-1 that came to be hailed as the world's largest rural job guarantee scheme although, at home, some fair criticisms were also levelled at the way the project worked on the ground. The critics pointed to corruption and noted that contractors were pocketing money by padding muster rolls and giving the workers less than they were promised. A good deal of this was true.
</p>
<p align="justify">
But it was equally noteworthy that the scheme gave employment to 50 million rural workers at a relatively small cost to the exchequer - something like 0.3 per cent of the GDP. Further, with the government's insistence on bank accounts being opened for workers (and this process has not fully matured), the money began to go directly to bank or post office accounts and that helped to reduce corruption.
</p>
<p align="justify">
But Mr Gadkari, a businessman who did some construction work in Mumbai as a minister in Maharashtra, is not impressed with the employment aspect. He appears keen to reduce the financing of the employment component of the MGNREGA and increase the material component. This can only help contractors who are, in any case, known to drool at the prospect of being hired for infrastructure projects and other public works. Under the original law, 60 per cent of the financing was to go for wages and 40 for materials. Mr Gadkari has made known his intention to make this 51:49. In wishing to bring this about, he is reported to be overruling the top civil servants in his ministry who point out that five crore rural families will go to rack and ruin if deprived of wage employment under MGNREGA.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The scheme was originally meant to offer 100 days of guaranteed unskilled work to every rural household and the UPA had said it desired to push this up to 150 days. The NDA proposes to lower the employment period. In addition, it also seeks to withdraw the coverage of the scheme by about one-third. Social activists like Aruna Roy, who was a force behind the implementation of the MGNREGA are naturally disappointed with the rural development minister's cavalier attitude. They have written to the PM. In the end, the whole thing may turn on how large their campaign to save rural jobs turns out to be.
</p>',
		'credit_writer' => 'Deccan Chronicle, 16 October, 2014, http://www.deccanchronicle.com/141016/commentary-dc-comment/article/rural-safety-net-essential-india',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'a-rural-safety-net-is-essential-in-india-4674230',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 4674230,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 26192,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | A rural safety net is essential in India',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Productive Assets,NREGA,mgnrega,Employment',
	'metaDesc' => '
-Deccan Chronicle


Under the stewardship of Union rural development minister Nitin Gadkari, things are looking far from good for the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, the 2005 law passed with cross-party support under UPA-1 that came to be hailed...',
	'disp' => '<div align="justify">-Deccan Chronicle</div><p align="justify">Under the stewardship of Union rural development minister Nitin Gadkari, things are looking far from good for the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, the 2005 law passed with cross-party support under UPA-1 that came to be hailed as the world's largest rural job guarantee scheme although, at home, some fair criticisms were also levelled at the way the project worked on the ground. The critics pointed to corruption and noted that contractors were pocketing money by padding muster rolls and giving the workers less than they were promised. A good deal of this was true.</p><p align="justify">But it was equally noteworthy that the scheme gave employment to 50 million rural workers at a relatively small cost to the exchequer - something like 0.3 per cent of the GDP. Further, with the government's insistence on bank accounts being opened for workers (and this process has not fully matured), the money began to go directly to bank or post office accounts and that helped to reduce corruption.</p><p align="justify">But Mr Gadkari, a businessman who did some construction work in Mumbai as a minister in Maharashtra, is not impressed with the employment aspect. He appears keen to reduce the financing of the employment component of the MGNREGA and increase the material component. This can only help contractors who are, in any case, known to drool at the prospect of being hired for infrastructure projects and other public works. Under the original law, 60 per cent of the financing was to go for wages and 40 for materials. Mr Gadkari has made known his intention to make this 51:49. In wishing to bring this about, he is reported to be overruling the top civil servants in his ministry who point out that five crore rural families will go to rack and ruin if deprived of wage employment under MGNREGA.</p><p align="justify">The scheme was originally meant to offer 100 days of guaranteed unskilled work to every rural household and the UPA had said it desired to push this up to 150 days. The NDA proposes to lower the employment period. In addition, it also seeks to withdraw the coverage of the scheme by about one-third. Social activists like Aruna Roy, who was a force behind the implementation of the MGNREGA are naturally disappointed with the rural development minister's cavalier attitude. They have written to the PM. In the end, the whole thing may turn on how large their campaign to save rural jobs turns out to be.</p>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 26192,
	'title' => 'A rural safety net is essential in India',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<div align="justify">
-Deccan Chronicle
</div>
<p align="justify">
Under the stewardship of Union rural development minister Nitin Gadkari, things are looking far from good for the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, the 2005 law passed with cross-party support under UPA-1 that came to be hailed as the world's largest rural job guarantee scheme although, at home, some fair criticisms were also levelled at the way the project worked on the ground. The critics pointed to corruption and noted that contractors were pocketing money by padding muster rolls and giving the workers less than they were promised. A good deal of this was true.
</p>
<p align="justify">
But it was equally noteworthy that the scheme gave employment to 50 million rural workers at a relatively small cost to the exchequer - something like 0.3 per cent of the GDP. Further, with the government's insistence on bank accounts being opened for workers (and this process has not fully matured), the money began to go directly to bank or post office accounts and that helped to reduce corruption.
</p>
<p align="justify">
But Mr Gadkari, a businessman who did some construction work in Mumbai as a minister in Maharashtra, is not impressed with the employment aspect. He appears keen to reduce the financing of the employment component of the MGNREGA and increase the material component. This can only help contractors who are, in any case, known to drool at the prospect of being hired for infrastructure projects and other public works. Under the original law, 60 per cent of the financing was to go for wages and 40 for materials. Mr Gadkari has made known his intention to make this 51:49. In wishing to bring this about, he is reported to be overruling the top civil servants in his ministry who point out that five crore rural families will go to rack and ruin if deprived of wage employment under MGNREGA.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The scheme was originally meant to offer 100 days of guaranteed unskilled work to every rural household and the UPA had said it desired to push this up to 150 days. The NDA proposes to lower the employment period. In addition, it also seeks to withdraw the coverage of the scheme by about one-third. Social activists like Aruna Roy, who was a force behind the implementation of the MGNREGA are naturally disappointed with the rural development minister's cavalier attitude. They have written to the PM. In the end, the whole thing may turn on how large their campaign to save rural jobs turns out to be.
</p>',
	'credit_writer' => 'Deccan Chronicle, 16 October, 2014, http://www.deccanchronicle.com/141016/commentary-dc-comment/article/rural-safety-net-essential-india',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'a-rural-safety-net-is-essential-in-india-4674230',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 4674230,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 26192
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | A rural safety net is essential in India'
$metaKeywords = 'Productive Assets,NREGA,mgnrega,Employment'
$metaDesc = '
-Deccan Chronicle


Under the stewardship of Union rural development minister Nitin Gadkari, things are looking far from good for the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, the 2005 law passed with cross-party support under UPA-1 that came to be hailed...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-Deccan Chronicle</div><p align="justify">Under the stewardship of Union rural development minister Nitin Gadkari, things are looking far from good for the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, the 2005 law passed with cross-party support under UPA-1 that came to be hailed as the world's largest rural job guarantee scheme although, at home, some fair criticisms were also levelled at the way the project worked on the ground. The critics pointed to corruption and noted that contractors were pocketing money by padding muster rolls and giving the workers less than they were promised. A good deal of this was true.</p><p align="justify">But it was equally noteworthy that the scheme gave employment to 50 million rural workers at a relatively small cost to the exchequer - something like 0.3 per cent of the GDP. Further, with the government's insistence on bank accounts being opened for workers (and this process has not fully matured), the money began to go directly to bank or post office accounts and that helped to reduce corruption.</p><p align="justify">But Mr Gadkari, a businessman who did some construction work in Mumbai as a minister in Maharashtra, is not impressed with the employment aspect. He appears keen to reduce the financing of the employment component of the MGNREGA and increase the material component. This can only help contractors who are, in any case, known to drool at the prospect of being hired for infrastructure projects and other public works. Under the original law, 60 per cent of the financing was to go for wages and 40 for materials. Mr Gadkari has made known his intention to make this 51:49. In wishing to bring this about, he is reported to be overruling the top civil servants in his ministry who point out that five crore rural families will go to rack and ruin if deprived of wage employment under MGNREGA.</p><p align="justify">The scheme was originally meant to offer 100 days of guaranteed unskilled work to every rural household and the UPA had said it desired to push this up to 150 days. The NDA proposes to lower the employment period. In addition, it also seeks to withdraw the coverage of the scheme by about one-third. Social activists like Aruna Roy, who was a force behind the implementation of the MGNREGA are naturally disappointed with the rural development minister's cavalier attitude. They have written to the PM. In the end, the whole thing may turn on how large their campaign to save rural jobs turns out to be.</p>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

A rural safety net is essential in India

-Deccan Chronicle Under the stewardship of Union rural development minister Nitin Gadkari, things are looking far from good for the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, the 2005 law passed with cross-party support under UPA-1 that came to be hailed as the world's largest rural job guarantee scheme although, at home, some fair criticisms were also levelled at the way the project worked on the ground. The critics pointed to corruption and noted that contractors were pocketing money by padding muster rolls and giving the workers less than they were promised. A good deal of this was true. But it was equally noteworthy that the scheme gave employment to 50 million rural workers at a relatively small cost to the exchequer - something like 0.3 per cent of the GDP. Further, with the government's insistence on bank accounts being opened for workers (and this process has not fully matured), the money began to go directly to bank or post office accounts and that helped to reduce corruption. But Mr Gadkari, a businessman who did some construction work in Mumbai as a minister in Maharashtra, is not impressed with the employment aspect. He appears keen to reduce the financing of the employment component of the MGNREGA and increase the material component. This can only help contractors who are, in any case, known to drool at the prospect of being hired for infrastructure projects and other public works. Under the original law, 60 per cent of the financing was to go for wages and 40 for materials. Mr Gadkari has made known his intention to make this 51:49. In wishing to bring this about, he is reported to be overruling the top civil servants in his ministry who point out that five crore rural families will go to rack and ruin if deprived of wage employment under MGNREGA. The scheme was originally meant to offer 100 days of guaranteed unskilled work to every rural household and the UPA had said it desired to push this up to 150 days. The NDA proposes to lower the employment period. In addition, it also seeks to withdraw the coverage of the scheme by about one-third. Social activists like Aruna Roy, who was a force behind the implementation of the MGNREGA are naturally disappointed with the rural development minister's cavalier attitude. They have written to the PM. In the end, the whole thing may turn on how large their campaign to save rural jobs turns out to be.