Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/a-sieve-of-a-scheme-by-chandrani-banerjee-1657/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/a-sieve-of-a-scheme-by-chandrani-banerjee-1657/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/a-sieve-of-a-scheme-by-chandrani-banerjee-1657/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/a-sieve-of-a-scheme-by-chandrani-banerjee-1657/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fc8a94cd58a-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fc8a94cd58a-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67fc8a94cd58a-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fc8a94cd58a-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fc8a94cd58a-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fc8a94cd58a-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fc8a94cd58a-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67fc8a94cd58a-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67fc8a94cd58a-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 1579, 'title' => 'A Sieve Of A Scheme? by Chandrani Banerjee', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><em>* Documentary evidence gathered by the Central Employment Guarantee Council (CEGC) from Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Bihar and Rajasthan points to large-scale embezzlement in nrega projects <br /> * Panchayats often furnish fake bills and fictitious companies have been floated to divert funds <br /> * Hundreds of crores are lost to this sort of leakage <br /> * The CAG, too, has pointed out&nbsp; large-scale irregularities and corruption in the implementation of NREGA projects and suggested improved auditing <br /> CEGC says proper enforcement of NREGA guidelines can ensure transparency </em></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The UPA&rsquo;s flagship welfare scheme, under the <a href="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=39">National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (NREGA)</a>, is becoming a cash cow for corrupt village panchayat representatives. Using loopholes, many of them have been diverting funds.&nbsp; Documentary evidence gathered from Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Bihar and Rajasthan by the Central Employment Guarantee Council (CEGC)&mdash;a statutory body overseeing implementation of NREGA work programmes&mdash;and handed over to the Union rural development ministry reveals inflated or fake bills are a routine affair. In many cases,&nbsp; companies stated to have supplied material turn out to be fictitious.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The scale of the scam can be understood if one considers the government outlay for the scheme. For 2010, it is Rs 60,000 crore, of which 60 per cent is to be spent in wages. The rest&mdash;40 per cent, or Rs 24,000 crore&mdash;is meant for procurement of material, which is where most of the defalcation takes place. The estimated loss to the exchequer in Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh is Rs 200 crore each; in Chhattisgarh, Rs 50 crore; and in Rajasthan, Rs 700 crore. Figures are not available for Bihar, but the embezzled funds may well run into several hundred crores here too. Nationwide, the leakages surely add up to a mind-boggling figure.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Aruna Roy of the Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan (MKSS), a CEGC member, has pointed out major discrepancies in how the scheme operates in Rajasthan. In several cases, she says, supplies of building material were made on paper by unregistered firms. One bill, for example, was for cement worth Rs 40,000, and it came from a firm that turned out to be owned by a man who repairs bicycles for a daily wage of Rs 40. &ldquo;It&rsquo;s not a matter of just one case or two,&rdquo; says Roy. &ldquo;There are several. People have no idea the sarpanch is using their name and signature for his own good.&rdquo;</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Sanjay Dixit, another CEGC member who has worked to check on leakages in Uttar Pradesh, says, &ldquo;In recent meetings, I informed the Union minister that panchayat representatives are purchasing materials for proposed projects, which are yet to take off!&rdquo; In a report he submitted, Dixit pointed out that in Uttar Pradesh, toys worth Rs 50 lakh were bought for creches that haven&rsquo;t come up yet. They gather dust in a godown.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In Rajasthan, the district that tops the list of NREGA embezzlement cases is Jodhpur, chief minister Ashok Gehlot&rsquo;s home district. Thirty-four complaints were received in the district; police registered cases in 25. In 2006, the first year of the scheme, not a single case of irregularity was registered in Rajasthan. The next year, there were still only seven cases, and in 2008, the figure jumped to 54. This year, the number of cases registered till February is already 300. Clearly, the NREGA is helping many people get rich. Sarpanches and gram sevaks figure prominently in the list of those against whom cases have been lodged. There are complaints against district collectors as well. Rajasthan rural development &amp; panchayati raj minister Bharat Singh says, &ldquo;A probe has been initiated against some collectors, including those of Karauli and Dungarpur.&rdquo;</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The picture in Madhya Pradesh, Bihar and Chhattisgarh is no different. In Madhya Pradesh, 84 complaints were registered from April 2009 to March 2010. In Bihar, the number of complaints stands at 79, and in Chhattisgarh, there are 281 cases awaiting disposal.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Meanwhile, the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG), the audit arm of the government, has also confirmed&nbsp; irregularities in the implementation of NREGA projects and has suggested a tighter auditing protocol. This is a demand voluntary groups monitoring the scheme have been making for quite some time. As Aruna Roy puts it, &ldquo;Corruption can be eradicated from NREGA projects through proper enforcement of transparency safeguards and guidelines that are already a part of the act.&rdquo;</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'Outlook Magazine, April, 2010, http://outlookindia.com/article.aspx?264994', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'a-sieve-of-a-scheme-by-chandrani-banerjee-1657', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 1657, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 1579, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | A Sieve Of A Scheme? by Chandrani Banerjee', 'metaKeywords' => 'NREGS', 'metaDesc' => ' * Documentary evidence gathered by the Central Employment Guarantee Council (CEGC) from Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Bihar and Rajasthan points to large-scale embezzlement in nrega projects * Panchayats often furnish fake bills and fictitious companies have been floated to...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><br /><br /><font ><em>* Documentary evidence gathered by the Central Employment Guarantee Council (CEGC) from Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Bihar and Rajasthan points to large-scale embezzlement in nrega projects <br />* Panchayats often furnish fake bills and fictitious companies have been floated to divert funds <br />* Hundreds of crores are lost to this sort of leakage <br />* The CAG, too, has pointed out&nbsp; large-scale irregularities and corruption in the implementation of NREGA projects and suggested improved auditing <br />CEGC says proper enforcement of NREGA guidelines can ensure transparency </em></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The UPA&rsquo;s flagship welfare scheme, under the <a href="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=39" title="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=39">National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (NREGA)</a>, is becoming a cash cow for corrupt village panchayat representatives. Using loopholes, many of them have been diverting funds.&nbsp; Documentary evidence gathered from Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Bihar and Rajasthan by the Central Employment Guarantee Council (CEGC)&mdash;a statutory body overseeing implementation of NREGA work programmes&mdash;and handed over to the Union rural development ministry reveals inflated or fake bills are a routine affair. In many cases,&nbsp; companies stated to have supplied material turn out to be fictitious.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The scale of the scam can be understood if one considers the government outlay for the scheme. For 2010, it is Rs 60,000 crore, of which 60 per cent is to be spent in wages. The rest&mdash;40 per cent, or Rs 24,000 crore&mdash;is meant for procurement of material, which is where most of the defalcation takes place. The estimated loss to the exchequer in Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh is Rs 200 crore each; in Chhattisgarh, Rs 50 crore; and in Rajasthan, Rs 700 crore. Figures are not available for Bihar, but the embezzled funds may well run into several hundred crores here too. Nationwide, the leakages surely add up to a mind-boggling figure.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Aruna Roy of the Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan (MKSS), a CEGC member, has pointed out major discrepancies in how the scheme operates in Rajasthan. In several cases, she says, supplies of building material were made on paper by unregistered firms. One bill, for example, was for cement worth Rs 40,000, and it came from a firm that turned out to be owned by a man who repairs bicycles for a daily wage of Rs 40. &ldquo;It&rsquo;s not a matter of just one case or two,&rdquo; says Roy. &ldquo;There are several. People have no idea the sarpanch is using their name and signature for his own good.&rdquo;</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Sanjay Dixit, another CEGC member who has worked to check on leakages in Uttar Pradesh, says, &ldquo;In recent meetings, I informed the Union minister that panchayat representatives are purchasing materials for proposed projects, which are yet to take off!&rdquo; In a report he submitted, Dixit pointed out that in Uttar Pradesh, toys worth Rs 50 lakh were bought for creches that haven&rsquo;t come up yet. They gather dust in a godown.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >In Rajasthan, the district that tops the list of NREGA embezzlement cases is Jodhpur, chief minister Ashok Gehlot&rsquo;s home district. Thirty-four complaints were received in the district; police registered cases in 25. In 2006, the first year of the scheme, not a single case of irregularity was registered in Rajasthan. The next year, there were still only seven cases, and in 2008, the figure jumped to 54. This year, the number of cases registered till February is already 300. Clearly, the NREGA is helping many people get rich. Sarpanches and gram sevaks figure prominently in the list of those against whom cases have been lodged. There are complaints against district collectors as well. Rajasthan rural development &amp; panchayati raj minister Bharat Singh says, &ldquo;A probe has been initiated against some collectors, including those of Karauli and Dungarpur.&rdquo;</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The picture in Madhya Pradesh, Bihar and Chhattisgarh is no different. In Madhya Pradesh, 84 complaints were registered from April 2009 to March 2010. In Bihar, the number of complaints stands at 79, and in Chhattisgarh, there are 281 cases awaiting disposal.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Meanwhile, the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG), the audit arm of the government, has also confirmed&nbsp; irregularities in the implementation of NREGA projects and has suggested a tighter auditing protocol. This is a demand voluntary groups monitoring the scheme have been making for quite some time. As Aruna Roy puts it, &ldquo;Corruption can be eradicated from NREGA projects through proper enforcement of transparency safeguards and guidelines that are already a part of the act.&rdquo;</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 1579, 'title' => 'A Sieve Of A Scheme? by Chandrani Banerjee', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><em>* Documentary evidence gathered by the Central Employment Guarantee Council (CEGC) from Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Bihar and Rajasthan points to large-scale embezzlement in nrega projects <br /> * Panchayats often furnish fake bills and fictitious companies have been floated to divert funds <br /> * Hundreds of crores are lost to this sort of leakage <br /> * The CAG, too, has pointed out&nbsp; large-scale irregularities and corruption in the implementation of NREGA projects and suggested improved auditing <br /> CEGC says proper enforcement of NREGA guidelines can ensure transparency </em></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The UPA&rsquo;s flagship welfare scheme, under the <a href="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=39">National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (NREGA)</a>, is becoming a cash cow for corrupt village panchayat representatives. Using loopholes, many of them have been diverting funds.&nbsp; Documentary evidence gathered from Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Bihar and Rajasthan by the Central Employment Guarantee Council (CEGC)&mdash;a statutory body overseeing implementation of NREGA work programmes&mdash;and handed over to the Union rural development ministry reveals inflated or fake bills are a routine affair. In many cases,&nbsp; companies stated to have supplied material turn out to be fictitious.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The scale of the scam can be understood if one considers the government outlay for the scheme. For 2010, it is Rs 60,000 crore, of which 60 per cent is to be spent in wages. The rest&mdash;40 per cent, or Rs 24,000 crore&mdash;is meant for procurement of material, which is where most of the defalcation takes place. The estimated loss to the exchequer in Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh is Rs 200 crore each; in Chhattisgarh, Rs 50 crore; and in Rajasthan, Rs 700 crore. Figures are not available for Bihar, but the embezzled funds may well run into several hundred crores here too. Nationwide, the leakages surely add up to a mind-boggling figure.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Aruna Roy of the Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan (MKSS), a CEGC member, has pointed out major discrepancies in how the scheme operates in Rajasthan. In several cases, she says, supplies of building material were made on paper by unregistered firms. One bill, for example, was for cement worth Rs 40,000, and it came from a firm that turned out to be owned by a man who repairs bicycles for a daily wage of Rs 40. &ldquo;It&rsquo;s not a matter of just one case or two,&rdquo; says Roy. &ldquo;There are several. People have no idea the sarpanch is using their name and signature for his own good.&rdquo;</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Sanjay Dixit, another CEGC member who has worked to check on leakages in Uttar Pradesh, says, &ldquo;In recent meetings, I informed the Union minister that panchayat representatives are purchasing materials for proposed projects, which are yet to take off!&rdquo; In a report he submitted, Dixit pointed out that in Uttar Pradesh, toys worth Rs 50 lakh were bought for creches that haven&rsquo;t come up yet. They gather dust in a godown.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In Rajasthan, the district that tops the list of NREGA embezzlement cases is Jodhpur, chief minister Ashok Gehlot&rsquo;s home district. Thirty-four complaints were received in the district; police registered cases in 25. In 2006, the first year of the scheme, not a single case of irregularity was registered in Rajasthan. The next year, there were still only seven cases, and in 2008, the figure jumped to 54. This year, the number of cases registered till February is already 300. Clearly, the NREGA is helping many people get rich. Sarpanches and gram sevaks figure prominently in the list of those against whom cases have been lodged. There are complaints against district collectors as well. Rajasthan rural development &amp; panchayati raj minister Bharat Singh says, &ldquo;A probe has been initiated against some collectors, including those of Karauli and Dungarpur.&rdquo;</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The picture in Madhya Pradesh, Bihar and Chhattisgarh is no different. In Madhya Pradesh, 84 complaints were registered from April 2009 to March 2010. In Bihar, the number of complaints stands at 79, and in Chhattisgarh, there are 281 cases awaiting disposal.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Meanwhile, the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG), the audit arm of the government, has also confirmed&nbsp; irregularities in the implementation of NREGA projects and has suggested a tighter auditing protocol. This is a demand voluntary groups monitoring the scheme have been making for quite some time. As Aruna Roy puts it, &ldquo;Corruption can be eradicated from NREGA projects through proper enforcement of transparency safeguards and guidelines that are already a part of the act.&rdquo;</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'Outlook Magazine, April, 2010, http://outlookindia.com/article.aspx?264994', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'a-sieve-of-a-scheme-by-chandrani-banerjee-1657', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 1657, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 1579 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | A Sieve Of A Scheme? by Chandrani Banerjee' $metaKeywords = 'NREGS' $metaDesc = ' * Documentary evidence gathered by the Central Employment Guarantee Council (CEGC) from Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Bihar and Rajasthan points to large-scale embezzlement in nrega projects * Panchayats often furnish fake bills and fictitious companies have been floated to...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><br /><br /><font ><em>* Documentary evidence gathered by the Central Employment Guarantee Council (CEGC) from Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Bihar and Rajasthan points to large-scale embezzlement in nrega projects <br />* Panchayats often furnish fake bills and fictitious companies have been floated to divert funds <br />* Hundreds of crores are lost to this sort of leakage <br />* The CAG, too, has pointed out&nbsp; large-scale irregularities and corruption in the implementation of NREGA projects and suggested improved auditing <br />CEGC says proper enforcement of NREGA guidelines can ensure transparency </em></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The UPA&rsquo;s flagship welfare scheme, under the <a href="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=39" title="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=39">National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (NREGA)</a>, is becoming a cash cow for corrupt village panchayat representatives. Using loopholes, many of them have been diverting funds.&nbsp; Documentary evidence gathered from Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Bihar and Rajasthan by the Central Employment Guarantee Council (CEGC)&mdash;a statutory body overseeing implementation of NREGA work programmes&mdash;and handed over to the Union rural development ministry reveals inflated or fake bills are a routine affair. In many cases,&nbsp; companies stated to have supplied material turn out to be fictitious.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The scale of the scam can be understood if one considers the government outlay for the scheme. For 2010, it is Rs 60,000 crore, of which 60 per cent is to be spent in wages. The rest&mdash;40 per cent, or Rs 24,000 crore&mdash;is meant for procurement of material, which is where most of the defalcation takes place. The estimated loss to the exchequer in Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh is Rs 200 crore each; in Chhattisgarh, Rs 50 crore; and in Rajasthan, Rs 700 crore. Figures are not available for Bihar, but the embezzled funds may well run into several hundred crores here too. Nationwide, the leakages surely add up to a mind-boggling figure.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Aruna Roy of the Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan (MKSS), a CEGC member, has pointed out major discrepancies in how the scheme operates in Rajasthan. In several cases, she says, supplies of building material were made on paper by unregistered firms. One bill, for example, was for cement worth Rs 40,000, and it came from a firm that turned out to be owned by a man who repairs bicycles for a daily wage of Rs 40. &ldquo;It&rsquo;s not a matter of just one case or two,&rdquo; says Roy. &ldquo;There are several. People have no idea the sarpanch is using their name and signature for his own good.&rdquo;</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Sanjay Dixit, another CEGC member who has worked to check on leakages in Uttar Pradesh, says, &ldquo;In recent meetings, I informed the Union minister that panchayat representatives are purchasing materials for proposed projects, which are yet to take off!&rdquo; In a report he submitted, Dixit pointed out that in Uttar Pradesh, toys worth Rs 50 lakh were bought for creches that haven&rsquo;t come up yet. They gather dust in a godown.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >In Rajasthan, the district that tops the list of NREGA embezzlement cases is Jodhpur, chief minister Ashok Gehlot&rsquo;s home district. Thirty-four complaints were received in the district; police registered cases in 25. In 2006, the first year of the scheme, not a single case of irregularity was registered in Rajasthan. The next year, there were still only seven cases, and in 2008, the figure jumped to 54. This year, the number of cases registered till February is already 300. Clearly, the NREGA is helping many people get rich. Sarpanches and gram sevaks figure prominently in the list of those against whom cases have been lodged. There are complaints against district collectors as well. Rajasthan rural development &amp; panchayati raj minister Bharat Singh says, &ldquo;A probe has been initiated against some collectors, including those of Karauli and Dungarpur.&rdquo;</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The picture in Madhya Pradesh, Bihar and Chhattisgarh is no different. In Madhya Pradesh, 84 complaints were registered from April 2009 to March 2010. In Bihar, the number of complaints stands at 79, and in Chhattisgarh, there are 281 cases awaiting disposal.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Meanwhile, the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG), the audit arm of the government, has also confirmed&nbsp; irregularities in the implementation of NREGA projects and has suggested a tighter auditing protocol. This is a demand voluntary groups monitoring the scheme have been making for quite some time. As Aruna Roy puts it, &ldquo;Corruption can be eradicated from NREGA projects through proper enforcement of transparency safeguards and guidelines that are already a part of the act.&rdquo;</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/a-sieve-of-a-scheme-by-chandrani-banerjee-1657.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | A Sieve Of A Scheme? by Chandrani Banerjee | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" * Documentary evidence gathered by the Central Employment Guarantee Council (CEGC) from Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Bihar and Rajasthan points to large-scale embezzlement in nrega projects * Panchayats often furnish fake bills and fictitious companies have been floated to..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>A Sieve Of A Scheme? by Chandrani Banerjee</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p align="justify"><br /><br /><font ><em>* Documentary evidence gathered by the Central Employment Guarantee Council (CEGC) from Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Bihar and Rajasthan points to large-scale embezzlement in nrega projects <br />* Panchayats often furnish fake bills and fictitious companies have been floated to divert funds <br />* Hundreds of crores are lost to this sort of leakage <br />* The CAG, too, has pointed out large-scale irregularities and corruption in the implementation of NREGA projects and suggested improved auditing <br />CEGC says proper enforcement of NREGA guidelines can ensure transparency </em></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The UPA’s flagship welfare scheme, under the <a href="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=39" title="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=39">National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (NREGA)</a>, is becoming a cash cow for corrupt village panchayat representatives. Using loopholes, many of them have been diverting funds. Documentary evidence gathered from Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Bihar and Rajasthan by the Central Employment Guarantee Council (CEGC)—a statutory body overseeing implementation of NREGA work programmes—and handed over to the Union rural development ministry reveals inflated or fake bills are a routine affair. In many cases, companies stated to have supplied material turn out to be fictitious.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The scale of the scam can be understood if one considers the government outlay for the scheme. For 2010, it is Rs 60,000 crore, of which 60 per cent is to be spent in wages. The rest—40 per cent, or Rs 24,000 crore—is meant for procurement of material, which is where most of the defalcation takes place. The estimated loss to the exchequer in Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh is Rs 200 crore each; in Chhattisgarh, Rs 50 crore; and in Rajasthan, Rs 700 crore. Figures are not available for Bihar, but the embezzled funds may well run into several hundred crores here too. Nationwide, the leakages surely add up to a mind-boggling figure.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Aruna Roy of the Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan (MKSS), a CEGC member, has pointed out major discrepancies in how the scheme operates in Rajasthan. In several cases, she says, supplies of building material were made on paper by unregistered firms. One bill, for example, was for cement worth Rs 40,000, and it came from a firm that turned out to be owned by a man who repairs bicycles for a daily wage of Rs 40. “It’s not a matter of just one case or two,” says Roy. “There are several. People have no idea the sarpanch is using their name and signature for his own good.”</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Sanjay Dixit, another CEGC member who has worked to check on leakages in Uttar Pradesh, says, “In recent meetings, I informed the Union minister that panchayat representatives are purchasing materials for proposed projects, which are yet to take off!” In a report he submitted, Dixit pointed out that in Uttar Pradesh, toys worth Rs 50 lakh were bought for creches that haven’t come up yet. They gather dust in a godown.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >In Rajasthan, the district that tops the list of NREGA embezzlement cases is Jodhpur, chief minister Ashok Gehlot’s home district. Thirty-four complaints were received in the district; police registered cases in 25. In 2006, the first year of the scheme, not a single case of irregularity was registered in Rajasthan. The next year, there were still only seven cases, and in 2008, the figure jumped to 54. This year, the number of cases registered till February is already 300. Clearly, the NREGA is helping many people get rich. Sarpanches and gram sevaks figure prominently in the list of those against whom cases have been lodged. There are complaints against district collectors as well. Rajasthan rural development & panchayati raj minister Bharat Singh says, “A probe has been initiated against some collectors, including those of Karauli and Dungarpur.”</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The picture in Madhya Pradesh, Bihar and Chhattisgarh is no different. In Madhya Pradesh, 84 complaints were registered from April 2009 to March 2010. In Bihar, the number of complaints stands at 79, and in Chhattisgarh, there are 281 cases awaiting disposal.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Meanwhile, the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG), the audit arm of the government, has also confirmed irregularities in the implementation of NREGA projects and has suggested a tighter auditing protocol. This is a demand voluntary groups monitoring the scheme have been making for quite some time. As Aruna Roy puts it, “Corruption can be eradicated from NREGA projects through proper enforcement of transparency safeguards and guidelines that are already a part of the act.”</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fc8a94cd58a-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fc8a94cd58a-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67fc8a94cd58a-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fc8a94cd58a-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fc8a94cd58a-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fc8a94cd58a-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fc8a94cd58a-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67fc8a94cd58a-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67fc8a94cd58a-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 1579, 'title' => 'A Sieve Of A Scheme? by Chandrani Banerjee', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><em>* Documentary evidence gathered by the Central Employment Guarantee Council (CEGC) from Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Bihar and Rajasthan points to large-scale embezzlement in nrega projects <br /> * Panchayats often furnish fake bills and fictitious companies have been floated to divert funds <br /> * Hundreds of crores are lost to this sort of leakage <br /> * The CAG, too, has pointed out&nbsp; large-scale irregularities and corruption in the implementation of NREGA projects and suggested improved auditing <br /> CEGC says proper enforcement of NREGA guidelines can ensure transparency </em></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The UPA&rsquo;s flagship welfare scheme, under the <a href="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=39">National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (NREGA)</a>, is becoming a cash cow for corrupt village panchayat representatives. Using loopholes, many of them have been diverting funds.&nbsp; Documentary evidence gathered from Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Bihar and Rajasthan by the Central Employment Guarantee Council (CEGC)&mdash;a statutory body overseeing implementation of NREGA work programmes&mdash;and handed over to the Union rural development ministry reveals inflated or fake bills are a routine affair. In many cases,&nbsp; companies stated to have supplied material turn out to be fictitious.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The scale of the scam can be understood if one considers the government outlay for the scheme. For 2010, it is Rs 60,000 crore, of which 60 per cent is to be spent in wages. The rest&mdash;40 per cent, or Rs 24,000 crore&mdash;is meant for procurement of material, which is where most of the defalcation takes place. The estimated loss to the exchequer in Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh is Rs 200 crore each; in Chhattisgarh, Rs 50 crore; and in Rajasthan, Rs 700 crore. Figures are not available for Bihar, but the embezzled funds may well run into several hundred crores here too. Nationwide, the leakages surely add up to a mind-boggling figure.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Aruna Roy of the Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan (MKSS), a CEGC member, has pointed out major discrepancies in how the scheme operates in Rajasthan. In several cases, she says, supplies of building material were made on paper by unregistered firms. One bill, for example, was for cement worth Rs 40,000, and it came from a firm that turned out to be owned by a man who repairs bicycles for a daily wage of Rs 40. &ldquo;It&rsquo;s not a matter of just one case or two,&rdquo; says Roy. &ldquo;There are several. People have no idea the sarpanch is using their name and signature for his own good.&rdquo;</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Sanjay Dixit, another CEGC member who has worked to check on leakages in Uttar Pradesh, says, &ldquo;In recent meetings, I informed the Union minister that panchayat representatives are purchasing materials for proposed projects, which are yet to take off!&rdquo; In a report he submitted, Dixit pointed out that in Uttar Pradesh, toys worth Rs 50 lakh were bought for creches that haven&rsquo;t come up yet. They gather dust in a godown.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In Rajasthan, the district that tops the list of NREGA embezzlement cases is Jodhpur, chief minister Ashok Gehlot&rsquo;s home district. Thirty-four complaints were received in the district; police registered cases in 25. In 2006, the first year of the scheme, not a single case of irregularity was registered in Rajasthan. The next year, there were still only seven cases, and in 2008, the figure jumped to 54. This year, the number of cases registered till February is already 300. Clearly, the NREGA is helping many people get rich. Sarpanches and gram sevaks figure prominently in the list of those against whom cases have been lodged. There are complaints against district collectors as well. Rajasthan rural development &amp; panchayati raj minister Bharat Singh says, &ldquo;A probe has been initiated against some collectors, including those of Karauli and Dungarpur.&rdquo;</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The picture in Madhya Pradesh, Bihar and Chhattisgarh is no different. In Madhya Pradesh, 84 complaints were registered from April 2009 to March 2010. In Bihar, the number of complaints stands at 79, and in Chhattisgarh, there are 281 cases awaiting disposal.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Meanwhile, the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG), the audit arm of the government, has also confirmed&nbsp; irregularities in the implementation of NREGA projects and has suggested a tighter auditing protocol. This is a demand voluntary groups monitoring the scheme have been making for quite some time. As Aruna Roy puts it, &ldquo;Corruption can be eradicated from NREGA projects through proper enforcement of transparency safeguards and guidelines that are already a part of the act.&rdquo;</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'Outlook Magazine, April, 2010, http://outlookindia.com/article.aspx?264994', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'a-sieve-of-a-scheme-by-chandrani-banerjee-1657', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 1657, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 1579, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | A Sieve Of A Scheme? by Chandrani Banerjee', 'metaKeywords' => 'NREGS', 'metaDesc' => ' * Documentary evidence gathered by the Central Employment Guarantee Council (CEGC) from Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Bihar and Rajasthan points to large-scale embezzlement in nrega projects * Panchayats often furnish fake bills and fictitious companies have been floated to...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><br /><br /><font ><em>* Documentary evidence gathered by the Central Employment Guarantee Council (CEGC) from Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Bihar and Rajasthan points to large-scale embezzlement in nrega projects <br />* Panchayats often furnish fake bills and fictitious companies have been floated to divert funds <br />* Hundreds of crores are lost to this sort of leakage <br />* The CAG, too, has pointed out&nbsp; large-scale irregularities and corruption in the implementation of NREGA projects and suggested improved auditing <br />CEGC says proper enforcement of NREGA guidelines can ensure transparency </em></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The UPA&rsquo;s flagship welfare scheme, under the <a href="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=39" title="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=39">National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (NREGA)</a>, is becoming a cash cow for corrupt village panchayat representatives. Using loopholes, many of them have been diverting funds.&nbsp; Documentary evidence gathered from Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Bihar and Rajasthan by the Central Employment Guarantee Council (CEGC)&mdash;a statutory body overseeing implementation of NREGA work programmes&mdash;and handed over to the Union rural development ministry reveals inflated or fake bills are a routine affair. In many cases,&nbsp; companies stated to have supplied material turn out to be fictitious.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The scale of the scam can be understood if one considers the government outlay for the scheme. For 2010, it is Rs 60,000 crore, of which 60 per cent is to be spent in wages. The rest&mdash;40 per cent, or Rs 24,000 crore&mdash;is meant for procurement of material, which is where most of the defalcation takes place. The estimated loss to the exchequer in Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh is Rs 200 crore each; in Chhattisgarh, Rs 50 crore; and in Rajasthan, Rs 700 crore. Figures are not available for Bihar, but the embezzled funds may well run into several hundred crores here too. Nationwide, the leakages surely add up to a mind-boggling figure.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Aruna Roy of the Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan (MKSS), a CEGC member, has pointed out major discrepancies in how the scheme operates in Rajasthan. In several cases, she says, supplies of building material were made on paper by unregistered firms. One bill, for example, was for cement worth Rs 40,000, and it came from a firm that turned out to be owned by a man who repairs bicycles for a daily wage of Rs 40. &ldquo;It&rsquo;s not a matter of just one case or two,&rdquo; says Roy. &ldquo;There are several. People have no idea the sarpanch is using their name and signature for his own good.&rdquo;</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Sanjay Dixit, another CEGC member who has worked to check on leakages in Uttar Pradesh, says, &ldquo;In recent meetings, I informed the Union minister that panchayat representatives are purchasing materials for proposed projects, which are yet to take off!&rdquo; In a report he submitted, Dixit pointed out that in Uttar Pradesh, toys worth Rs 50 lakh were bought for creches that haven&rsquo;t come up yet. They gather dust in a godown.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >In Rajasthan, the district that tops the list of NREGA embezzlement cases is Jodhpur, chief minister Ashok Gehlot&rsquo;s home district. Thirty-four complaints were received in the district; police registered cases in 25. In 2006, the first year of the scheme, not a single case of irregularity was registered in Rajasthan. The next year, there were still only seven cases, and in 2008, the figure jumped to 54. This year, the number of cases registered till February is already 300. Clearly, the NREGA is helping many people get rich. Sarpanches and gram sevaks figure prominently in the list of those against whom cases have been lodged. There are complaints against district collectors as well. Rajasthan rural development &amp; panchayati raj minister Bharat Singh says, &ldquo;A probe has been initiated against some collectors, including those of Karauli and Dungarpur.&rdquo;</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The picture in Madhya Pradesh, Bihar and Chhattisgarh is no different. In Madhya Pradesh, 84 complaints were registered from April 2009 to March 2010. In Bihar, the number of complaints stands at 79, and in Chhattisgarh, there are 281 cases awaiting disposal.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Meanwhile, the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG), the audit arm of the government, has also confirmed&nbsp; irregularities in the implementation of NREGA projects and has suggested a tighter auditing protocol. This is a demand voluntary groups monitoring the scheme have been making for quite some time. As Aruna Roy puts it, &ldquo;Corruption can be eradicated from NREGA projects through proper enforcement of transparency safeguards and guidelines that are already a part of the act.&rdquo;</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 1579, 'title' => 'A Sieve Of A Scheme? by Chandrani Banerjee', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><em>* Documentary evidence gathered by the Central Employment Guarantee Council (CEGC) from Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Bihar and Rajasthan points to large-scale embezzlement in nrega projects <br /> * Panchayats often furnish fake bills and fictitious companies have been floated to divert funds <br /> * Hundreds of crores are lost to this sort of leakage <br /> * The CAG, too, has pointed out&nbsp; large-scale irregularities and corruption in the implementation of NREGA projects and suggested improved auditing <br /> CEGC says proper enforcement of NREGA guidelines can ensure transparency </em></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The UPA&rsquo;s flagship welfare scheme, under the <a href="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=39">National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (NREGA)</a>, is becoming a cash cow for corrupt village panchayat representatives. Using loopholes, many of them have been diverting funds.&nbsp; Documentary evidence gathered from Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Bihar and Rajasthan by the Central Employment Guarantee Council (CEGC)&mdash;a statutory body overseeing implementation of NREGA work programmes&mdash;and handed over to the Union rural development ministry reveals inflated or fake bills are a routine affair. In many cases,&nbsp; companies stated to have supplied material turn out to be fictitious.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The scale of the scam can be understood if one considers the government outlay for the scheme. For 2010, it is Rs 60,000 crore, of which 60 per cent is to be spent in wages. The rest&mdash;40 per cent, or Rs 24,000 crore&mdash;is meant for procurement of material, which is where most of the defalcation takes place. The estimated loss to the exchequer in Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh is Rs 200 crore each; in Chhattisgarh, Rs 50 crore; and in Rajasthan, Rs 700 crore. Figures are not available for Bihar, but the embezzled funds may well run into several hundred crores here too. Nationwide, the leakages surely add up to a mind-boggling figure.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Aruna Roy of the Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan (MKSS), a CEGC member, has pointed out major discrepancies in how the scheme operates in Rajasthan. In several cases, she says, supplies of building material were made on paper by unregistered firms. One bill, for example, was for cement worth Rs 40,000, and it came from a firm that turned out to be owned by a man who repairs bicycles for a daily wage of Rs 40. &ldquo;It&rsquo;s not a matter of just one case or two,&rdquo; says Roy. &ldquo;There are several. People have no idea the sarpanch is using their name and signature for his own good.&rdquo;</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Sanjay Dixit, another CEGC member who has worked to check on leakages in Uttar Pradesh, says, &ldquo;In recent meetings, I informed the Union minister that panchayat representatives are purchasing materials for proposed projects, which are yet to take off!&rdquo; In a report he submitted, Dixit pointed out that in Uttar Pradesh, toys worth Rs 50 lakh were bought for creches that haven&rsquo;t come up yet. They gather dust in a godown.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In Rajasthan, the district that tops the list of NREGA embezzlement cases is Jodhpur, chief minister Ashok Gehlot&rsquo;s home district. Thirty-four complaints were received in the district; police registered cases in 25. In 2006, the first year of the scheme, not a single case of irregularity was registered in Rajasthan. The next year, there were still only seven cases, and in 2008, the figure jumped to 54. This year, the number of cases registered till February is already 300. Clearly, the NREGA is helping many people get rich. Sarpanches and gram sevaks figure prominently in the list of those against whom cases have been lodged. There are complaints against district collectors as well. Rajasthan rural development &amp; panchayati raj minister Bharat Singh says, &ldquo;A probe has been initiated against some collectors, including those of Karauli and Dungarpur.&rdquo;</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The picture in Madhya Pradesh, Bihar and Chhattisgarh is no different. In Madhya Pradesh, 84 complaints were registered from April 2009 to March 2010. In Bihar, the number of complaints stands at 79, and in Chhattisgarh, there are 281 cases awaiting disposal.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Meanwhile, the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG), the audit arm of the government, has also confirmed&nbsp; irregularities in the implementation of NREGA projects and has suggested a tighter auditing protocol. This is a demand voluntary groups monitoring the scheme have been making for quite some time. As Aruna Roy puts it, &ldquo;Corruption can be eradicated from NREGA projects through proper enforcement of transparency safeguards and guidelines that are already a part of the act.&rdquo;</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'Outlook Magazine, April, 2010, http://outlookindia.com/article.aspx?264994', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'a-sieve-of-a-scheme-by-chandrani-banerjee-1657', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 1657, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 1579 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | A Sieve Of A Scheme? by Chandrani Banerjee' $metaKeywords = 'NREGS' $metaDesc = ' * Documentary evidence gathered by the Central Employment Guarantee Council (CEGC) from Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Bihar and Rajasthan points to large-scale embezzlement in nrega projects * Panchayats often furnish fake bills and fictitious companies have been floated to...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><br /><br /><font ><em>* Documentary evidence gathered by the Central Employment Guarantee Council (CEGC) from Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Bihar and Rajasthan points to large-scale embezzlement in nrega projects <br />* Panchayats often furnish fake bills and fictitious companies have been floated to divert funds <br />* Hundreds of crores are lost to this sort of leakage <br />* The CAG, too, has pointed out&nbsp; large-scale irregularities and corruption in the implementation of NREGA projects and suggested improved auditing <br />CEGC says proper enforcement of NREGA guidelines can ensure transparency </em></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The UPA&rsquo;s flagship welfare scheme, under the <a href="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=39" title="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=39">National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (NREGA)</a>, is becoming a cash cow for corrupt village panchayat representatives. Using loopholes, many of them have been diverting funds.&nbsp; Documentary evidence gathered from Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Bihar and Rajasthan by the Central Employment Guarantee Council (CEGC)&mdash;a statutory body overseeing implementation of NREGA work programmes&mdash;and handed over to the Union rural development ministry reveals inflated or fake bills are a routine affair. In many cases,&nbsp; companies stated to have supplied material turn out to be fictitious.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The scale of the scam can be understood if one considers the government outlay for the scheme. For 2010, it is Rs 60,000 crore, of which 60 per cent is to be spent in wages. The rest&mdash;40 per cent, or Rs 24,000 crore&mdash;is meant for procurement of material, which is where most of the defalcation takes place. The estimated loss to the exchequer in Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh is Rs 200 crore each; in Chhattisgarh, Rs 50 crore; and in Rajasthan, Rs 700 crore. Figures are not available for Bihar, but the embezzled funds may well run into several hundred crores here too. Nationwide, the leakages surely add up to a mind-boggling figure.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Aruna Roy of the Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan (MKSS), a CEGC member, has pointed out major discrepancies in how the scheme operates in Rajasthan. In several cases, she says, supplies of building material were made on paper by unregistered firms. One bill, for example, was for cement worth Rs 40,000, and it came from a firm that turned out to be owned by a man who repairs bicycles for a daily wage of Rs 40. &ldquo;It&rsquo;s not a matter of just one case or two,&rdquo; says Roy. &ldquo;There are several. People have no idea the sarpanch is using their name and signature for his own good.&rdquo;</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Sanjay Dixit, another CEGC member who has worked to check on leakages in Uttar Pradesh, says, &ldquo;In recent meetings, I informed the Union minister that panchayat representatives are purchasing materials for proposed projects, which are yet to take off!&rdquo; In a report he submitted, Dixit pointed out that in Uttar Pradesh, toys worth Rs 50 lakh were bought for creches that haven&rsquo;t come up yet. They gather dust in a godown.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >In Rajasthan, the district that tops the list of NREGA embezzlement cases is Jodhpur, chief minister Ashok Gehlot&rsquo;s home district. Thirty-four complaints were received in the district; police registered cases in 25. In 2006, the first year of the scheme, not a single case of irregularity was registered in Rajasthan. The next year, there were still only seven cases, and in 2008, the figure jumped to 54. This year, the number of cases registered till February is already 300. Clearly, the NREGA is helping many people get rich. Sarpanches and gram sevaks figure prominently in the list of those against whom cases have been lodged. There are complaints against district collectors as well. Rajasthan rural development &amp; panchayati raj minister Bharat Singh says, &ldquo;A probe has been initiated against some collectors, including those of Karauli and Dungarpur.&rdquo;</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The picture in Madhya Pradesh, Bihar and Chhattisgarh is no different. In Madhya Pradesh, 84 complaints were registered from April 2009 to March 2010. In Bihar, the number of complaints stands at 79, and in Chhattisgarh, there are 281 cases awaiting disposal.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Meanwhile, the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG), the audit arm of the government, has also confirmed&nbsp; irregularities in the implementation of NREGA projects and has suggested a tighter auditing protocol. This is a demand voluntary groups monitoring the scheme have been making for quite some time. As Aruna Roy puts it, &ldquo;Corruption can be eradicated from NREGA projects through proper enforcement of transparency safeguards and guidelines that are already a part of the act.&rdquo;</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/a-sieve-of-a-scheme-by-chandrani-banerjee-1657.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | A Sieve Of A Scheme? by Chandrani Banerjee | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" * Documentary evidence gathered by the Central Employment Guarantee Council (CEGC) from Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Bihar and Rajasthan points to large-scale embezzlement in nrega projects * Panchayats often furnish fake bills and fictitious companies have been floated to..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>A Sieve Of A Scheme? by Chandrani Banerjee</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p align="justify"><br /><br /><font ><em>* Documentary evidence gathered by the Central Employment Guarantee Council (CEGC) from Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Bihar and Rajasthan points to large-scale embezzlement in nrega projects <br />* Panchayats often furnish fake bills and fictitious companies have been floated to divert funds <br />* Hundreds of crores are lost to this sort of leakage <br />* The CAG, too, has pointed out large-scale irregularities and corruption in the implementation of NREGA projects and suggested improved auditing <br />CEGC says proper enforcement of NREGA guidelines can ensure transparency </em></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The UPA’s flagship welfare scheme, under the <a href="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=39" title="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=39">National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (NREGA)</a>, is becoming a cash cow for corrupt village panchayat representatives. Using loopholes, many of them have been diverting funds. Documentary evidence gathered from Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Bihar and Rajasthan by the Central Employment Guarantee Council (CEGC)—a statutory body overseeing implementation of NREGA work programmes—and handed over to the Union rural development ministry reveals inflated or fake bills are a routine affair. In many cases, companies stated to have supplied material turn out to be fictitious.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The scale of the scam can be understood if one considers the government outlay for the scheme. For 2010, it is Rs 60,000 crore, of which 60 per cent is to be spent in wages. The rest—40 per cent, or Rs 24,000 crore—is meant for procurement of material, which is where most of the defalcation takes place. The estimated loss to the exchequer in Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh is Rs 200 crore each; in Chhattisgarh, Rs 50 crore; and in Rajasthan, Rs 700 crore. Figures are not available for Bihar, but the embezzled funds may well run into several hundred crores here too. Nationwide, the leakages surely add up to a mind-boggling figure.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Aruna Roy of the Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan (MKSS), a CEGC member, has pointed out major discrepancies in how the scheme operates in Rajasthan. In several cases, she says, supplies of building material were made on paper by unregistered firms. One bill, for example, was for cement worth Rs 40,000, and it came from a firm that turned out to be owned by a man who repairs bicycles for a daily wage of Rs 40. “It’s not a matter of just one case or two,” says Roy. “There are several. People have no idea the sarpanch is using their name and signature for his own good.”</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Sanjay Dixit, another CEGC member who has worked to check on leakages in Uttar Pradesh, says, “In recent meetings, I informed the Union minister that panchayat representatives are purchasing materials for proposed projects, which are yet to take off!” In a report he submitted, Dixit pointed out that in Uttar Pradesh, toys worth Rs 50 lakh were bought for creches that haven’t come up yet. They gather dust in a godown.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >In Rajasthan, the district that tops the list of NREGA embezzlement cases is Jodhpur, chief minister Ashok Gehlot’s home district. Thirty-four complaints were received in the district; police registered cases in 25. In 2006, the first year of the scheme, not a single case of irregularity was registered in Rajasthan. The next year, there were still only seven cases, and in 2008, the figure jumped to 54. This year, the number of cases registered till February is already 300. Clearly, the NREGA is helping many people get rich. Sarpanches and gram sevaks figure prominently in the list of those against whom cases have been lodged. There are complaints against district collectors as well. Rajasthan rural development & panchayati raj minister Bharat Singh says, “A probe has been initiated against some collectors, including those of Karauli and Dungarpur.”</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The picture in Madhya Pradesh, Bihar and Chhattisgarh is no different. In Madhya Pradesh, 84 complaints were registered from April 2009 to March 2010. In Bihar, the number of complaints stands at 79, and in Chhattisgarh, there are 281 cases awaiting disposal.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Meanwhile, the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG), the audit arm of the government, has also confirmed irregularities in the implementation of NREGA projects and has suggested a tighter auditing protocol. This is a demand voluntary groups monitoring the scheme have been making for quite some time. As Aruna Roy puts it, “Corruption can be eradicated from NREGA projects through proper enforcement of transparency safeguards and guidelines that are already a part of the act.”</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fc8a94cd58a-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fc8a94cd58a-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67fc8a94cd58a-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fc8a94cd58a-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fc8a94cd58a-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fc8a94cd58a-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fc8a94cd58a-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67fc8a94cd58a-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67fc8a94cd58a-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 1579, 'title' => 'A Sieve Of A Scheme? by Chandrani Banerjee', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><em>* Documentary evidence gathered by the Central Employment Guarantee Council (CEGC) from Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Bihar and Rajasthan points to large-scale embezzlement in nrega projects <br /> * Panchayats often furnish fake bills and fictitious companies have been floated to divert funds <br /> * Hundreds of crores are lost to this sort of leakage <br /> * The CAG, too, has pointed out&nbsp; large-scale irregularities and corruption in the implementation of NREGA projects and suggested improved auditing <br /> CEGC says proper enforcement of NREGA guidelines can ensure transparency </em></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The UPA&rsquo;s flagship welfare scheme, under the <a href="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=39">National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (NREGA)</a>, is becoming a cash cow for corrupt village panchayat representatives. Using loopholes, many of them have been diverting funds.&nbsp; Documentary evidence gathered from Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Bihar and Rajasthan by the Central Employment Guarantee Council (CEGC)&mdash;a statutory body overseeing implementation of NREGA work programmes&mdash;and handed over to the Union rural development ministry reveals inflated or fake bills are a routine affair. In many cases,&nbsp; companies stated to have supplied material turn out to be fictitious.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The scale of the scam can be understood if one considers the government outlay for the scheme. For 2010, it is Rs 60,000 crore, of which 60 per cent is to be spent in wages. The rest&mdash;40 per cent, or Rs 24,000 crore&mdash;is meant for procurement of material, which is where most of the defalcation takes place. The estimated loss to the exchequer in Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh is Rs 200 crore each; in Chhattisgarh, Rs 50 crore; and in Rajasthan, Rs 700 crore. Figures are not available for Bihar, but the embezzled funds may well run into several hundred crores here too. Nationwide, the leakages surely add up to a mind-boggling figure.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Aruna Roy of the Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan (MKSS), a CEGC member, has pointed out major discrepancies in how the scheme operates in Rajasthan. In several cases, she says, supplies of building material were made on paper by unregistered firms. One bill, for example, was for cement worth Rs 40,000, and it came from a firm that turned out to be owned by a man who repairs bicycles for a daily wage of Rs 40. &ldquo;It&rsquo;s not a matter of just one case or two,&rdquo; says Roy. &ldquo;There are several. People have no idea the sarpanch is using their name and signature for his own good.&rdquo;</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Sanjay Dixit, another CEGC member who has worked to check on leakages in Uttar Pradesh, says, &ldquo;In recent meetings, I informed the Union minister that panchayat representatives are purchasing materials for proposed projects, which are yet to take off!&rdquo; In a report he submitted, Dixit pointed out that in Uttar Pradesh, toys worth Rs 50 lakh were bought for creches that haven&rsquo;t come up yet. They gather dust in a godown.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In Rajasthan, the district that tops the list of NREGA embezzlement cases is Jodhpur, chief minister Ashok Gehlot&rsquo;s home district. Thirty-four complaints were received in the district; police registered cases in 25. In 2006, the first year of the scheme, not a single case of irregularity was registered in Rajasthan. The next year, there were still only seven cases, and in 2008, the figure jumped to 54. This year, the number of cases registered till February is already 300. Clearly, the NREGA is helping many people get rich. Sarpanches and gram sevaks figure prominently in the list of those against whom cases have been lodged. There are complaints against district collectors as well. Rajasthan rural development &amp; panchayati raj minister Bharat Singh says, &ldquo;A probe has been initiated against some collectors, including those of Karauli and Dungarpur.&rdquo;</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The picture in Madhya Pradesh, Bihar and Chhattisgarh is no different. In Madhya Pradesh, 84 complaints were registered from April 2009 to March 2010. In Bihar, the number of complaints stands at 79, and in Chhattisgarh, there are 281 cases awaiting disposal.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Meanwhile, the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG), the audit arm of the government, has also confirmed&nbsp; irregularities in the implementation of NREGA projects and has suggested a tighter auditing protocol. This is a demand voluntary groups monitoring the scheme have been making for quite some time. As Aruna Roy puts it, &ldquo;Corruption can be eradicated from NREGA projects through proper enforcement of transparency safeguards and guidelines that are already a part of the act.&rdquo;</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'Outlook Magazine, April, 2010, http://outlookindia.com/article.aspx?264994', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'a-sieve-of-a-scheme-by-chandrani-banerjee-1657', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 1657, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 1579, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | A Sieve Of A Scheme? by Chandrani Banerjee', 'metaKeywords' => 'NREGS', 'metaDesc' => ' * Documentary evidence gathered by the Central Employment Guarantee Council (CEGC) from Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Bihar and Rajasthan points to large-scale embezzlement in nrega projects * Panchayats often furnish fake bills and fictitious companies have been floated to...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><br /><br /><font ><em>* Documentary evidence gathered by the Central Employment Guarantee Council (CEGC) from Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Bihar and Rajasthan points to large-scale embezzlement in nrega projects <br />* Panchayats often furnish fake bills and fictitious companies have been floated to divert funds <br />* Hundreds of crores are lost to this sort of leakage <br />* The CAG, too, has pointed out&nbsp; large-scale irregularities and corruption in the implementation of NREGA projects and suggested improved auditing <br />CEGC says proper enforcement of NREGA guidelines can ensure transparency </em></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The UPA&rsquo;s flagship welfare scheme, under the <a href="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=39" title="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=39">National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (NREGA)</a>, is becoming a cash cow for corrupt village panchayat representatives. Using loopholes, many of them have been diverting funds.&nbsp; Documentary evidence gathered from Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Bihar and Rajasthan by the Central Employment Guarantee Council (CEGC)&mdash;a statutory body overseeing implementation of NREGA work programmes&mdash;and handed over to the Union rural development ministry reveals inflated or fake bills are a routine affair. In many cases,&nbsp; companies stated to have supplied material turn out to be fictitious.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The scale of the scam can be understood if one considers the government outlay for the scheme. For 2010, it is Rs 60,000 crore, of which 60 per cent is to be spent in wages. The rest&mdash;40 per cent, or Rs 24,000 crore&mdash;is meant for procurement of material, which is where most of the defalcation takes place. The estimated loss to the exchequer in Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh is Rs 200 crore each; in Chhattisgarh, Rs 50 crore; and in Rajasthan, Rs 700 crore. Figures are not available for Bihar, but the embezzled funds may well run into several hundred crores here too. Nationwide, the leakages surely add up to a mind-boggling figure.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Aruna Roy of the Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan (MKSS), a CEGC member, has pointed out major discrepancies in how the scheme operates in Rajasthan. In several cases, she says, supplies of building material were made on paper by unregistered firms. One bill, for example, was for cement worth Rs 40,000, and it came from a firm that turned out to be owned by a man who repairs bicycles for a daily wage of Rs 40. &ldquo;It&rsquo;s not a matter of just one case or two,&rdquo; says Roy. &ldquo;There are several. People have no idea the sarpanch is using their name and signature for his own good.&rdquo;</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Sanjay Dixit, another CEGC member who has worked to check on leakages in Uttar Pradesh, says, &ldquo;In recent meetings, I informed the Union minister that panchayat representatives are purchasing materials for proposed projects, which are yet to take off!&rdquo; In a report he submitted, Dixit pointed out that in Uttar Pradesh, toys worth Rs 50 lakh were bought for creches that haven&rsquo;t come up yet. They gather dust in a godown.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >In Rajasthan, the district that tops the list of NREGA embezzlement cases is Jodhpur, chief minister Ashok Gehlot&rsquo;s home district. Thirty-four complaints were received in the district; police registered cases in 25. In 2006, the first year of the scheme, not a single case of irregularity was registered in Rajasthan. The next year, there were still only seven cases, and in 2008, the figure jumped to 54. This year, the number of cases registered till February is already 300. Clearly, the NREGA is helping many people get rich. Sarpanches and gram sevaks figure prominently in the list of those against whom cases have been lodged. There are complaints against district collectors as well. Rajasthan rural development &amp; panchayati raj minister Bharat Singh says, &ldquo;A probe has been initiated against some collectors, including those of Karauli and Dungarpur.&rdquo;</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The picture in Madhya Pradesh, Bihar and Chhattisgarh is no different. In Madhya Pradesh, 84 complaints were registered from April 2009 to March 2010. In Bihar, the number of complaints stands at 79, and in Chhattisgarh, there are 281 cases awaiting disposal.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Meanwhile, the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG), the audit arm of the government, has also confirmed&nbsp; irregularities in the implementation of NREGA projects and has suggested a tighter auditing protocol. This is a demand voluntary groups monitoring the scheme have been making for quite some time. As Aruna Roy puts it, &ldquo;Corruption can be eradicated from NREGA projects through proper enforcement of transparency safeguards and guidelines that are already a part of the act.&rdquo;</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 1579, 'title' => 'A Sieve Of A Scheme? by Chandrani Banerjee', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><em>* Documentary evidence gathered by the Central Employment Guarantee Council (CEGC) from Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Bihar and Rajasthan points to large-scale embezzlement in nrega projects <br /> * Panchayats often furnish fake bills and fictitious companies have been floated to divert funds <br /> * Hundreds of crores are lost to this sort of leakage <br /> * The CAG, too, has pointed out&nbsp; large-scale irregularities and corruption in the implementation of NREGA projects and suggested improved auditing <br /> CEGC says proper enforcement of NREGA guidelines can ensure transparency </em></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The UPA&rsquo;s flagship welfare scheme, under the <a href="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=39">National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (NREGA)</a>, is becoming a cash cow for corrupt village panchayat representatives. Using loopholes, many of them have been diverting funds.&nbsp; Documentary evidence gathered from Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Bihar and Rajasthan by the Central Employment Guarantee Council (CEGC)&mdash;a statutory body overseeing implementation of NREGA work programmes&mdash;and handed over to the Union rural development ministry reveals inflated or fake bills are a routine affair. In many cases,&nbsp; companies stated to have supplied material turn out to be fictitious.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The scale of the scam can be understood if one considers the government outlay for the scheme. For 2010, it is Rs 60,000 crore, of which 60 per cent is to be spent in wages. The rest&mdash;40 per cent, or Rs 24,000 crore&mdash;is meant for procurement of material, which is where most of the defalcation takes place. The estimated loss to the exchequer in Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh is Rs 200 crore each; in Chhattisgarh, Rs 50 crore; and in Rajasthan, Rs 700 crore. Figures are not available for Bihar, but the embezzled funds may well run into several hundred crores here too. Nationwide, the leakages surely add up to a mind-boggling figure.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Aruna Roy of the Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan (MKSS), a CEGC member, has pointed out major discrepancies in how the scheme operates in Rajasthan. In several cases, she says, supplies of building material were made on paper by unregistered firms. One bill, for example, was for cement worth Rs 40,000, and it came from a firm that turned out to be owned by a man who repairs bicycles for a daily wage of Rs 40. &ldquo;It&rsquo;s not a matter of just one case or two,&rdquo; says Roy. &ldquo;There are several. People have no idea the sarpanch is using their name and signature for his own good.&rdquo;</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Sanjay Dixit, another CEGC member who has worked to check on leakages in Uttar Pradesh, says, &ldquo;In recent meetings, I informed the Union minister that panchayat representatives are purchasing materials for proposed projects, which are yet to take off!&rdquo; In a report he submitted, Dixit pointed out that in Uttar Pradesh, toys worth Rs 50 lakh were bought for creches that haven&rsquo;t come up yet. They gather dust in a godown.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In Rajasthan, the district that tops the list of NREGA embezzlement cases is Jodhpur, chief minister Ashok Gehlot&rsquo;s home district. Thirty-four complaints were received in the district; police registered cases in 25. In 2006, the first year of the scheme, not a single case of irregularity was registered in Rajasthan. The next year, there were still only seven cases, and in 2008, the figure jumped to 54. This year, the number of cases registered till February is already 300. Clearly, the NREGA is helping many people get rich. Sarpanches and gram sevaks figure prominently in the list of those against whom cases have been lodged. There are complaints against district collectors as well. Rajasthan rural development &amp; panchayati raj minister Bharat Singh says, &ldquo;A probe has been initiated against some collectors, including those of Karauli and Dungarpur.&rdquo;</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The picture in Madhya Pradesh, Bihar and Chhattisgarh is no different. In Madhya Pradesh, 84 complaints were registered from April 2009 to March 2010. In Bihar, the number of complaints stands at 79, and in Chhattisgarh, there are 281 cases awaiting disposal.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Meanwhile, the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG), the audit arm of the government, has also confirmed&nbsp; irregularities in the implementation of NREGA projects and has suggested a tighter auditing protocol. This is a demand voluntary groups monitoring the scheme have been making for quite some time. As Aruna Roy puts it, &ldquo;Corruption can be eradicated from NREGA projects through proper enforcement of transparency safeguards and guidelines that are already a part of the act.&rdquo;</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'Outlook Magazine, April, 2010, http://outlookindia.com/article.aspx?264994', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'a-sieve-of-a-scheme-by-chandrani-banerjee-1657', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 1657, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 1579 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | A Sieve Of A Scheme? by Chandrani Banerjee' $metaKeywords = 'NREGS' $metaDesc = ' * Documentary evidence gathered by the Central Employment Guarantee Council (CEGC) from Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Bihar and Rajasthan points to large-scale embezzlement in nrega projects * Panchayats often furnish fake bills and fictitious companies have been floated to...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><br /><br /><font ><em>* Documentary evidence gathered by the Central Employment Guarantee Council (CEGC) from Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Bihar and Rajasthan points to large-scale embezzlement in nrega projects <br />* Panchayats often furnish fake bills and fictitious companies have been floated to divert funds <br />* Hundreds of crores are lost to this sort of leakage <br />* The CAG, too, has pointed out&nbsp; large-scale irregularities and corruption in the implementation of NREGA projects and suggested improved auditing <br />CEGC says proper enforcement of NREGA guidelines can ensure transparency </em></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The UPA&rsquo;s flagship welfare scheme, under the <a href="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=39" title="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=39">National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (NREGA)</a>, is becoming a cash cow for corrupt village panchayat representatives. Using loopholes, many of them have been diverting funds.&nbsp; Documentary evidence gathered from Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Bihar and Rajasthan by the Central Employment Guarantee Council (CEGC)&mdash;a statutory body overseeing implementation of NREGA work programmes&mdash;and handed over to the Union rural development ministry reveals inflated or fake bills are a routine affair. In many cases,&nbsp; companies stated to have supplied material turn out to be fictitious.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The scale of the scam can be understood if one considers the government outlay for the scheme. For 2010, it is Rs 60,000 crore, of which 60 per cent is to be spent in wages. The rest&mdash;40 per cent, or Rs 24,000 crore&mdash;is meant for procurement of material, which is where most of the defalcation takes place. The estimated loss to the exchequer in Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh is Rs 200 crore each; in Chhattisgarh, Rs 50 crore; and in Rajasthan, Rs 700 crore. Figures are not available for Bihar, but the embezzled funds may well run into several hundred crores here too. Nationwide, the leakages surely add up to a mind-boggling figure.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Aruna Roy of the Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan (MKSS), a CEGC member, has pointed out major discrepancies in how the scheme operates in Rajasthan. In several cases, she says, supplies of building material were made on paper by unregistered firms. One bill, for example, was for cement worth Rs 40,000, and it came from a firm that turned out to be owned by a man who repairs bicycles for a daily wage of Rs 40. &ldquo;It&rsquo;s not a matter of just one case or two,&rdquo; says Roy. &ldquo;There are several. People have no idea the sarpanch is using their name and signature for his own good.&rdquo;</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Sanjay Dixit, another CEGC member who has worked to check on leakages in Uttar Pradesh, says, &ldquo;In recent meetings, I informed the Union minister that panchayat representatives are purchasing materials for proposed projects, which are yet to take off!&rdquo; In a report he submitted, Dixit pointed out that in Uttar Pradesh, toys worth Rs 50 lakh were bought for creches that haven&rsquo;t come up yet. They gather dust in a godown.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >In Rajasthan, the district that tops the list of NREGA embezzlement cases is Jodhpur, chief minister Ashok Gehlot&rsquo;s home district. Thirty-four complaints were received in the district; police registered cases in 25. In 2006, the first year of the scheme, not a single case of irregularity was registered in Rajasthan. The next year, there were still only seven cases, and in 2008, the figure jumped to 54. This year, the number of cases registered till February is already 300. Clearly, the NREGA is helping many people get rich. Sarpanches and gram sevaks figure prominently in the list of those against whom cases have been lodged. There are complaints against district collectors as well. Rajasthan rural development &amp; panchayati raj minister Bharat Singh says, &ldquo;A probe has been initiated against some collectors, including those of Karauli and Dungarpur.&rdquo;</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The picture in Madhya Pradesh, Bihar and Chhattisgarh is no different. In Madhya Pradesh, 84 complaints were registered from April 2009 to March 2010. In Bihar, the number of complaints stands at 79, and in Chhattisgarh, there are 281 cases awaiting disposal.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Meanwhile, the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG), the audit arm of the government, has also confirmed&nbsp; irregularities in the implementation of NREGA projects and has suggested a tighter auditing protocol. This is a demand voluntary groups monitoring the scheme have been making for quite some time. As Aruna Roy puts it, &ldquo;Corruption can be eradicated from NREGA projects through proper enforcement of transparency safeguards and guidelines that are already a part of the act.&rdquo;</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/a-sieve-of-a-scheme-by-chandrani-banerjee-1657.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | A Sieve Of A Scheme? by Chandrani Banerjee | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" * Documentary evidence gathered by the Central Employment Guarantee Council (CEGC) from Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Bihar and Rajasthan points to large-scale embezzlement in nrega projects * Panchayats often furnish fake bills and fictitious companies have been floated to..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>A Sieve Of A Scheme? by Chandrani Banerjee</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p align="justify"><br /><br /><font ><em>* Documentary evidence gathered by the Central Employment Guarantee Council (CEGC) from Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Bihar and Rajasthan points to large-scale embezzlement in nrega projects <br />* Panchayats often furnish fake bills and fictitious companies have been floated to divert funds <br />* Hundreds of crores are lost to this sort of leakage <br />* The CAG, too, has pointed out large-scale irregularities and corruption in the implementation of NREGA projects and suggested improved auditing <br />CEGC says proper enforcement of NREGA guidelines can ensure transparency </em></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The UPA’s flagship welfare scheme, under the <a href="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=39" title="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=39">National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (NREGA)</a>, is becoming a cash cow for corrupt village panchayat representatives. Using loopholes, many of them have been diverting funds. Documentary evidence gathered from Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Bihar and Rajasthan by the Central Employment Guarantee Council (CEGC)—a statutory body overseeing implementation of NREGA work programmes—and handed over to the Union rural development ministry reveals inflated or fake bills are a routine affair. In many cases, companies stated to have supplied material turn out to be fictitious.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The scale of the scam can be understood if one considers the government outlay for the scheme. For 2010, it is Rs 60,000 crore, of which 60 per cent is to be spent in wages. The rest—40 per cent, or Rs 24,000 crore—is meant for procurement of material, which is where most of the defalcation takes place. The estimated loss to the exchequer in Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh is Rs 200 crore each; in Chhattisgarh, Rs 50 crore; and in Rajasthan, Rs 700 crore. Figures are not available for Bihar, but the embezzled funds may well run into several hundred crores here too. Nationwide, the leakages surely add up to a mind-boggling figure.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Aruna Roy of the Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan (MKSS), a CEGC member, has pointed out major discrepancies in how the scheme operates in Rajasthan. In several cases, she says, supplies of building material were made on paper by unregistered firms. One bill, for example, was for cement worth Rs 40,000, and it came from a firm that turned out to be owned by a man who repairs bicycles for a daily wage of Rs 40. “It’s not a matter of just one case or two,” says Roy. “There are several. People have no idea the sarpanch is using their name and signature for his own good.”</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Sanjay Dixit, another CEGC member who has worked to check on leakages in Uttar Pradesh, says, “In recent meetings, I informed the Union minister that panchayat representatives are purchasing materials for proposed projects, which are yet to take off!” In a report he submitted, Dixit pointed out that in Uttar Pradesh, toys worth Rs 50 lakh were bought for creches that haven’t come up yet. They gather dust in a godown.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >In Rajasthan, the district that tops the list of NREGA embezzlement cases is Jodhpur, chief minister Ashok Gehlot’s home district. Thirty-four complaints were received in the district; police registered cases in 25. In 2006, the first year of the scheme, not a single case of irregularity was registered in Rajasthan. The next year, there were still only seven cases, and in 2008, the figure jumped to 54. This year, the number of cases registered till February is already 300. Clearly, the NREGA is helping many people get rich. Sarpanches and gram sevaks figure prominently in the list of those against whom cases have been lodged. There are complaints against district collectors as well. Rajasthan rural development & panchayati raj minister Bharat Singh says, “A probe has been initiated against some collectors, including those of Karauli and Dungarpur.”</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The picture in Madhya Pradesh, Bihar and Chhattisgarh is no different. In Madhya Pradesh, 84 complaints were registered from April 2009 to March 2010. In Bihar, the number of complaints stands at 79, and in Chhattisgarh, there are 281 cases awaiting disposal.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Meanwhile, the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG), the audit arm of the government, has also confirmed irregularities in the implementation of NREGA projects and has suggested a tighter auditing protocol. This is a demand voluntary groups monitoring the scheme have been making for quite some time. As Aruna Roy puts it, “Corruption can be eradicated from NREGA projects through proper enforcement of transparency safeguards and guidelines that are already a part of the act.”</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 1579, 'title' => 'A Sieve Of A Scheme? by Chandrani Banerjee', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><em>* Documentary evidence gathered by the Central Employment Guarantee Council (CEGC) from Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Bihar and Rajasthan points to large-scale embezzlement in nrega projects <br /> * Panchayats often furnish fake bills and fictitious companies have been floated to divert funds <br /> * Hundreds of crores are lost to this sort of leakage <br /> * The CAG, too, has pointed out large-scale irregularities and corruption in the implementation of NREGA projects and suggested improved auditing <br /> CEGC says proper enforcement of NREGA guidelines can ensure transparency </em></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The UPA’s flagship welfare scheme, under the <a href="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=39">National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (NREGA)</a>, is becoming a cash cow for corrupt village panchayat representatives. Using loopholes, many of them have been diverting funds. Documentary evidence gathered from Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Bihar and Rajasthan by the Central Employment Guarantee Council (CEGC)—a statutory body overseeing implementation of NREGA work programmes—and handed over to the Union rural development ministry reveals inflated or fake bills are a routine affair. In many cases, companies stated to have supplied material turn out to be fictitious.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The scale of the scam can be understood if one considers the government outlay for the scheme. For 2010, it is Rs 60,000 crore, of which 60 per cent is to be spent in wages. The rest—40 per cent, or Rs 24,000 crore—is meant for procurement of material, which is where most of the defalcation takes place. The estimated loss to the exchequer in Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh is Rs 200 crore each; in Chhattisgarh, Rs 50 crore; and in Rajasthan, Rs 700 crore. Figures are not available for Bihar, but the embezzled funds may well run into several hundred crores here too. Nationwide, the leakages surely add up to a mind-boggling figure.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Aruna Roy of the Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan (MKSS), a CEGC member, has pointed out major discrepancies in how the scheme operates in Rajasthan. In several cases, she says, supplies of building material were made on paper by unregistered firms. One bill, for example, was for cement worth Rs 40,000, and it came from a firm that turned out to be owned by a man who repairs bicycles for a daily wage of Rs 40. “It’s not a matter of just one case or two,” says Roy. “There are several. People have no idea the sarpanch is using their name and signature for his own good.”</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Sanjay Dixit, another CEGC member who has worked to check on leakages in Uttar Pradesh, says, “In recent meetings, I informed the Union minister that panchayat representatives are purchasing materials for proposed projects, which are yet to take off!” In a report he submitted, Dixit pointed out that in Uttar Pradesh, toys worth Rs 50 lakh were bought for creches that haven’t come up yet. They gather dust in a godown.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In Rajasthan, the district that tops the list of NREGA embezzlement cases is Jodhpur, chief minister Ashok Gehlot’s home district. Thirty-four complaints were received in the district; police registered cases in 25. In 2006, the first year of the scheme, not a single case of irregularity was registered in Rajasthan. The next year, there were still only seven cases, and in 2008, the figure jumped to 54. This year, the number of cases registered till February is already 300. Clearly, the NREGA is helping many people get rich. Sarpanches and gram sevaks figure prominently in the list of those against whom cases have been lodged. There are complaints against district collectors as well. Rajasthan rural development & panchayati raj minister Bharat Singh says, “A probe has been initiated against some collectors, including those of Karauli and Dungarpur.”</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The picture in Madhya Pradesh, Bihar and Chhattisgarh is no different. In Madhya Pradesh, 84 complaints were registered from April 2009 to March 2010. In Bihar, the number of complaints stands at 79, and in Chhattisgarh, there are 281 cases awaiting disposal.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Meanwhile, the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG), the audit arm of the government, has also confirmed irregularities in the implementation of NREGA projects and has suggested a tighter auditing protocol. This is a demand voluntary groups monitoring the scheme have been making for quite some time. As Aruna Roy puts it, “Corruption can be eradicated from NREGA projects through proper enforcement of transparency safeguards and guidelines that are already a part of the act.”</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'Outlook Magazine, April, 2010, http://outlookindia.com/article.aspx?264994', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'a-sieve-of-a-scheme-by-chandrani-banerjee-1657', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 1657, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 1579, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | A Sieve Of A Scheme? by Chandrani Banerjee', 'metaKeywords' => 'NREGS', 'metaDesc' => ' * Documentary evidence gathered by the Central Employment Guarantee Council (CEGC) from Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Bihar and Rajasthan points to large-scale embezzlement in nrega projects * Panchayats often furnish fake bills and fictitious companies have been floated to...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><br /><br /><font ><em>* Documentary evidence gathered by the Central Employment Guarantee Council (CEGC) from Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Bihar and Rajasthan points to large-scale embezzlement in nrega projects <br />* Panchayats often furnish fake bills and fictitious companies have been floated to divert funds <br />* Hundreds of crores are lost to this sort of leakage <br />* The CAG, too, has pointed out large-scale irregularities and corruption in the implementation of NREGA projects and suggested improved auditing <br />CEGC says proper enforcement of NREGA guidelines can ensure transparency </em></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The UPA’s flagship welfare scheme, under the <a href="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=39" title="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=39">National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (NREGA)</a>, is becoming a cash cow for corrupt village panchayat representatives. Using loopholes, many of them have been diverting funds. Documentary evidence gathered from Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Bihar and Rajasthan by the Central Employment Guarantee Council (CEGC)—a statutory body overseeing implementation of NREGA work programmes—and handed over to the Union rural development ministry reveals inflated or fake bills are a routine affair. In many cases, companies stated to have supplied material turn out to be fictitious.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The scale of the scam can be understood if one considers the government outlay for the scheme. For 2010, it is Rs 60,000 crore, of which 60 per cent is to be spent in wages. The rest—40 per cent, or Rs 24,000 crore—is meant for procurement of material, which is where most of the defalcation takes place. The estimated loss to the exchequer in Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh is Rs 200 crore each; in Chhattisgarh, Rs 50 crore; and in Rajasthan, Rs 700 crore. Figures are not available for Bihar, but the embezzled funds may well run into several hundred crores here too. Nationwide, the leakages surely add up to a mind-boggling figure.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Aruna Roy of the Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan (MKSS), a CEGC member, has pointed out major discrepancies in how the scheme operates in Rajasthan. In several cases, she says, supplies of building material were made on paper by unregistered firms. One bill, for example, was for cement worth Rs 40,000, and it came from a firm that turned out to be owned by a man who repairs bicycles for a daily wage of Rs 40. “It’s not a matter of just one case or two,” says Roy. “There are several. People have no idea the sarpanch is using their name and signature for his own good.”</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Sanjay Dixit, another CEGC member who has worked to check on leakages in Uttar Pradesh, says, “In recent meetings, I informed the Union minister that panchayat representatives are purchasing materials for proposed projects, which are yet to take off!” In a report he submitted, Dixit pointed out that in Uttar Pradesh, toys worth Rs 50 lakh were bought for creches that haven’t come up yet. They gather dust in a godown.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >In Rajasthan, the district that tops the list of NREGA embezzlement cases is Jodhpur, chief minister Ashok Gehlot’s home district. Thirty-four complaints were received in the district; police registered cases in 25. In 2006, the first year of the scheme, not a single case of irregularity was registered in Rajasthan. The next year, there were still only seven cases, and in 2008, the figure jumped to 54. This year, the number of cases registered till February is already 300. Clearly, the NREGA is helping many people get rich. Sarpanches and gram sevaks figure prominently in the list of those against whom cases have been lodged. There are complaints against district collectors as well. Rajasthan rural development & panchayati raj minister Bharat Singh says, “A probe has been initiated against some collectors, including those of Karauli and Dungarpur.”</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The picture in Madhya Pradesh, Bihar and Chhattisgarh is no different. In Madhya Pradesh, 84 complaints were registered from April 2009 to March 2010. In Bihar, the number of complaints stands at 79, and in Chhattisgarh, there are 281 cases awaiting disposal.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Meanwhile, the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG), the audit arm of the government, has also confirmed irregularities in the implementation of NREGA projects and has suggested a tighter auditing protocol. This is a demand voluntary groups monitoring the scheme have been making for quite some time. As Aruna Roy puts it, “Corruption can be eradicated from NREGA projects through proper enforcement of transparency safeguards and guidelines that are already a part of the act.”</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 1579, 'title' => 'A Sieve Of A Scheme? by Chandrani Banerjee', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><em>* Documentary evidence gathered by the Central Employment Guarantee Council (CEGC) from Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Bihar and Rajasthan points to large-scale embezzlement in nrega projects <br /> * Panchayats often furnish fake bills and fictitious companies have been floated to divert funds <br /> * Hundreds of crores are lost to this sort of leakage <br /> * The CAG, too, has pointed out large-scale irregularities and corruption in the implementation of NREGA projects and suggested improved auditing <br /> CEGC says proper enforcement of NREGA guidelines can ensure transparency </em></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The UPA’s flagship welfare scheme, under the <a href="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=39">National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (NREGA)</a>, is becoming a cash cow for corrupt village panchayat representatives. Using loopholes, many of them have been diverting funds. Documentary evidence gathered from Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Bihar and Rajasthan by the Central Employment Guarantee Council (CEGC)—a statutory body overseeing implementation of NREGA work programmes—and handed over to the Union rural development ministry reveals inflated or fake bills are a routine affair. In many cases, companies stated to have supplied material turn out to be fictitious.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The scale of the scam can be understood if one considers the government outlay for the scheme. For 2010, it is Rs 60,000 crore, of which 60 per cent is to be spent in wages. The rest—40 per cent, or Rs 24,000 crore—is meant for procurement of material, which is where most of the defalcation takes place. The estimated loss to the exchequer in Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh is Rs 200 crore each; in Chhattisgarh, Rs 50 crore; and in Rajasthan, Rs 700 crore. Figures are not available for Bihar, but the embezzled funds may well run into several hundred crores here too. Nationwide, the leakages surely add up to a mind-boggling figure.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Aruna Roy of the Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan (MKSS), a CEGC member, has pointed out major discrepancies in how the scheme operates in Rajasthan. In several cases, she says, supplies of building material were made on paper by unregistered firms. One bill, for example, was for cement worth Rs 40,000, and it came from a firm that turned out to be owned by a man who repairs bicycles for a daily wage of Rs 40. “It’s not a matter of just one case or two,” says Roy. “There are several. People have no idea the sarpanch is using their name and signature for his own good.”</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Sanjay Dixit, another CEGC member who has worked to check on leakages in Uttar Pradesh, says, “In recent meetings, I informed the Union minister that panchayat representatives are purchasing materials for proposed projects, which are yet to take off!” In a report he submitted, Dixit pointed out that in Uttar Pradesh, toys worth Rs 50 lakh were bought for creches that haven’t come up yet. They gather dust in a godown.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In Rajasthan, the district that tops the list of NREGA embezzlement cases is Jodhpur, chief minister Ashok Gehlot’s home district. Thirty-four complaints were received in the district; police registered cases in 25. In 2006, the first year of the scheme, not a single case of irregularity was registered in Rajasthan. The next year, there were still only seven cases, and in 2008, the figure jumped to 54. This year, the number of cases registered till February is already 300. Clearly, the NREGA is helping many people get rich. Sarpanches and gram sevaks figure prominently in the list of those against whom cases have been lodged. There are complaints against district collectors as well. Rajasthan rural development & panchayati raj minister Bharat Singh says, “A probe has been initiated against some collectors, including those of Karauli and Dungarpur.”</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The picture in Madhya Pradesh, Bihar and Chhattisgarh is no different. In Madhya Pradesh, 84 complaints were registered from April 2009 to March 2010. In Bihar, the number of complaints stands at 79, and in Chhattisgarh, there are 281 cases awaiting disposal.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Meanwhile, the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG), the audit arm of the government, has also confirmed irregularities in the implementation of NREGA projects and has suggested a tighter auditing protocol. This is a demand voluntary groups monitoring the scheme have been making for quite some time. As Aruna Roy puts it, “Corruption can be eradicated from NREGA projects through proper enforcement of transparency safeguards and guidelines that are already a part of the act.”</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'Outlook Magazine, April, 2010, http://outlookindia.com/article.aspx?264994', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'a-sieve-of-a-scheme-by-chandrani-banerjee-1657', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 1657, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 1579 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | A Sieve Of A Scheme? by Chandrani Banerjee' $metaKeywords = 'NREGS' $metaDesc = ' * Documentary evidence gathered by the Central Employment Guarantee Council (CEGC) from Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Bihar and Rajasthan points to large-scale embezzlement in nrega projects * Panchayats often furnish fake bills and fictitious companies have been floated to...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><br /><br /><font ><em>* Documentary evidence gathered by the Central Employment Guarantee Council (CEGC) from Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Bihar and Rajasthan points to large-scale embezzlement in nrega projects <br />* Panchayats often furnish fake bills and fictitious companies have been floated to divert funds <br />* Hundreds of crores are lost to this sort of leakage <br />* The CAG, too, has pointed out large-scale irregularities and corruption in the implementation of NREGA projects and suggested improved auditing <br />CEGC says proper enforcement of NREGA guidelines can ensure transparency </em></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The UPA’s flagship welfare scheme, under the <a href="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=39" title="http://im4change.org/articles.php?articleId=39">National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (NREGA)</a>, is becoming a cash cow for corrupt village panchayat representatives. Using loopholes, many of them have been diverting funds. Documentary evidence gathered from Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Bihar and Rajasthan by the Central Employment Guarantee Council (CEGC)—a statutory body overseeing implementation of NREGA work programmes—and handed over to the Union rural development ministry reveals inflated or fake bills are a routine affair. In many cases, companies stated to have supplied material turn out to be fictitious.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The scale of the scam can be understood if one considers the government outlay for the scheme. For 2010, it is Rs 60,000 crore, of which 60 per cent is to be spent in wages. The rest—40 per cent, or Rs 24,000 crore—is meant for procurement of material, which is where most of the defalcation takes place. The estimated loss to the exchequer in Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh is Rs 200 crore each; in Chhattisgarh, Rs 50 crore; and in Rajasthan, Rs 700 crore. Figures are not available for Bihar, but the embezzled funds may well run into several hundred crores here too. Nationwide, the leakages surely add up to a mind-boggling figure.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Aruna Roy of the Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan (MKSS), a CEGC member, has pointed out major discrepancies in how the scheme operates in Rajasthan. In several cases, she says, supplies of building material were made on paper by unregistered firms. One bill, for example, was for cement worth Rs 40,000, and it came from a firm that turned out to be owned by a man who repairs bicycles for a daily wage of Rs 40. “It’s not a matter of just one case or two,” says Roy. “There are several. People have no idea the sarpanch is using their name and signature for his own good.”</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Sanjay Dixit, another CEGC member who has worked to check on leakages in Uttar Pradesh, says, “In recent meetings, I informed the Union minister that panchayat representatives are purchasing materials for proposed projects, which are yet to take off!” In a report he submitted, Dixit pointed out that in Uttar Pradesh, toys worth Rs 50 lakh were bought for creches that haven’t come up yet. They gather dust in a godown.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >In Rajasthan, the district that tops the list of NREGA embezzlement cases is Jodhpur, chief minister Ashok Gehlot’s home district. Thirty-four complaints were received in the district; police registered cases in 25. In 2006, the first year of the scheme, not a single case of irregularity was registered in Rajasthan. The next year, there were still only seven cases, and in 2008, the figure jumped to 54. This year, the number of cases registered till February is already 300. Clearly, the NREGA is helping many people get rich. Sarpanches and gram sevaks figure prominently in the list of those against whom cases have been lodged. There are complaints against district collectors as well. Rajasthan rural development & panchayati raj minister Bharat Singh says, “A probe has been initiated against some collectors, including those of Karauli and Dungarpur.”</font></p><p align="justify"><font >The picture in Madhya Pradesh, Bihar and Chhattisgarh is no different. In Madhya Pradesh, 84 complaints were registered from April 2009 to March 2010. In Bihar, the number of complaints stands at 79, and in Chhattisgarh, there are 281 cases awaiting disposal.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >Meanwhile, the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG), the audit arm of the government, has also confirmed irregularities in the implementation of NREGA projects and has suggested a tighter auditing protocol. This is a demand voluntary groups monitoring the scheme have been making for quite some time. As Aruna Roy puts it, “Corruption can be eradicated from NREGA projects through proper enforcement of transparency safeguards and guidelines that are already a part of the act.”</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
A Sieve Of A Scheme? by Chandrani Banerjee |
The UPA’s flagship welfare scheme, under the National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (NREGA), is becoming a cash cow for corrupt village panchayat representatives. Using loopholes, many of them have been diverting funds. Documentary evidence gathered from Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Bihar and Rajasthan by the Central Employment Guarantee Council (CEGC)—a statutory body overseeing implementation of NREGA work programmes—and handed over to the Union rural development ministry reveals inflated or fake bills are a routine affair. In many cases, companies stated to have supplied material turn out to be fictitious. The scale of the scam can be understood if one considers the government outlay for the scheme. For 2010, it is Rs 60,000 crore, of which 60 per cent is to be spent in wages. The rest—40 per cent, or Rs 24,000 crore—is meant for procurement of material, which is where most of the defalcation takes place. The estimated loss to the exchequer in Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh is Rs 200 crore each; in Chhattisgarh, Rs 50 crore; and in Rajasthan, Rs 700 crore. Figures are not available for Bihar, but the embezzled funds may well run into several hundred crores here too. Nationwide, the leakages surely add up to a mind-boggling figure. Aruna Roy of the Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan (MKSS), a CEGC member, has pointed out major discrepancies in how the scheme operates in Rajasthan. In several cases, she says, supplies of building material were made on paper by unregistered firms. One bill, for example, was for cement worth Rs 40,000, and it came from a firm that turned out to be owned by a man who repairs bicycles for a daily wage of Rs 40. “It’s not a matter of just one case or two,” says Roy. “There are several. People have no idea the sarpanch is using their name and signature for his own good.” Sanjay Dixit, another CEGC member who has worked to check on leakages in Uttar Pradesh, says, “In recent meetings, I informed the Union minister that panchayat representatives are purchasing materials for proposed projects, which are yet to take off!” In a report he submitted, Dixit pointed out that in Uttar Pradesh, toys worth Rs 50 lakh were bought for creches that haven’t come up yet. They gather dust in a godown. In Rajasthan, the district that tops the list of NREGA embezzlement cases is Jodhpur, chief minister Ashok Gehlot’s home district. Thirty-four complaints were received in the district; police registered cases in 25. In 2006, the first year of the scheme, not a single case of irregularity was registered in Rajasthan. The next year, there were still only seven cases, and in 2008, the figure jumped to 54. This year, the number of cases registered till February is already 300. Clearly, the NREGA is helping many people get rich. Sarpanches and gram sevaks figure prominently in the list of those against whom cases have been lodged. There are complaints against district collectors as well. Rajasthan rural development & panchayati raj minister Bharat Singh says, “A probe has been initiated against some collectors, including those of Karauli and Dungarpur.” The picture in Madhya Pradesh, Bihar and Chhattisgarh is no different. In Madhya Pradesh, 84 complaints were registered from April 2009 to March 2010. In Bihar, the number of complaints stands at 79, and in Chhattisgarh, there are 281 cases awaiting disposal. Meanwhile, the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG), the audit arm of the government, has also confirmed irregularities in the implementation of NREGA projects and has suggested a tighter auditing protocol. This is a demand voluntary groups monitoring the scheme have been making for quite some time. As Aruna Roy puts it, “Corruption can be eradicated from NREGA projects through proper enforcement of transparency safeguards and guidelines that are already a part of the act.” |