Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/aadhaar-order-breach-annoys-sc-4676759/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/aadhaar-order-breach-annoys-sc-4676759/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/aadhaar-order-breach-annoys-sc-4676759/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/aadhaar-order-breach-annoys-sc-4676759/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6825d400b5ce1-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6825d400b5ce1-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6825d400b5ce1-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6825d400b5ce1-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6825d400b5ce1-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6825d400b5ce1-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6825d400b5ce1-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6825d400b5ce1-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6825d400b5ce1-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 28706,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Aadhaar order breach annoys SC&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The Supreme Court today expressed serious concern over some states&#039; insistence on Aadhaar cards to extend social welfare schemes and other common services to citizens despite its two interim orders that the card should not be made mandatory until the court has decided its constitutional validity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A three-judge bench of Justices J. Chelameshwar, S.A. Bobde and C. Nagappan asked attorney-general Mukul Rohatgi to report to it by tomorrow the erring states that continue to insist on Aadhaar cards.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Notwithstanding our interim orders, some of the states are still insisting upon the cards, going by the newspaper reports. Even today in the morning, I saw a newspaper (report) that a very senior officer in a particular state had said that the card is mandatory... it is a very unfortunate situation,&amp;quot; said Justice Chelameshwar, heading the bench.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The judge asked the attorney-general to verify the reports.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rohatgi said he would check and get back to the court. &amp;quot;I will ask the states not to do it, we will write to them. As far as we (Centre) are concerned, we are going strictly by the interim order, we have told them &#039;don&#039;t insist&#039;.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The apex court had on September 23, 2013, restrained the government from making the cards mandatory for social welfare schemes until it decided the validity of the scheme that has been challenged as &amp;quot;unconstitutional&amp;quot; in PILs. It reiterated the stay on March 16, 2015.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The three-judge bench today commenced a fresh hearing of the matter that will be spread over two weeks as the earlier presiding judge, Justice B.S. Chauhan, has retired.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Appearing for the Centre, Rohatgi urged the court to refer the matter to a five-judge Constitution bench because it involves complex constitutional questions, including the right to privacy and other freedoms guaranteed to citizens.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bench asked the attorney-general to prepare suitable points for the court to consider whether or not the issue needs to be referred to a larger bench. Rohatgi will present the points tomorrow.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Centre had through an affidavit last week urged the court to vacate its stay on making Aadhaar cards mandatory, pleading that this was affecting social welfare schemes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It said the stay has affected the effective implementation of the Direct Benefits Transfers (DBT). Although financial benefits are now being transferred to bank accounts, the government is unable to locate fake, ghost or duplicate accounts, which it could have &amp;quot;easily done if Aadhaar numbers are provided&amp;quot;, the application said. The government promised all safeguards during the enrolment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Narendra Modi government told the court it intends to link the Aadhaar cards to obtaining passports, PAN cards, immigration, railways, telecommunications and prison management systems. It said that since the Aadhaar &amp;quot;scheme has been a tremendous success&amp;quot;, the government wants to extend it to all welfare projects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The stand is in contrast to the BJP&#039;s sharp criticism of Aadhaar - a flagship programme of UPA-II - when the party was in the Opposition. Narendra Modi had in his election speeches described the Aadhaar scheme as a &amp;quot;scam&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The PILs have challenged introduction of Aadhaar by way of an executive order on January 28, 2009, arguing that it violated citizens&#039; fundamental right to privacy.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 22 July, 2015, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1150722/jsp/nation/story_33015.jsp#.Va9Q7Pk1t_k&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;aadhaar-order-breach-annoys-sc-4676759&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4676759,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 28706,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Aadhaar order breach annoys SC&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;cash transfer,cash transfers,Direct Benefit Transfer,DBT,aadhaar,uid,Direct Benefits Transfer,Supreme Court&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: The Supreme Court today expressed serious concern over some states&#039; insistence on Aadhaar cards to extend social welfare schemes and other common services to citizens despite its two interim orders that the card should not be made...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The Supreme Court today expressed serious concern over some states&#039; insistence on Aadhaar cards to extend social welfare schemes and other common services to citizens despite its two interim orders that the card should not be made mandatory until the court has decided its constitutional validity.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A three-judge bench of Justices J. Chelameshwar, S.A. Bobde and C. Nagappan asked attorney-general Mukul Rohatgi to report to it by tomorrow the erring states that continue to insist on Aadhaar cards.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Notwithstanding our interim orders, some of the states are still insisting upon the cards, going by the newspaper reports. Even today in the morning, I saw a newspaper (report) that a very senior officer in a particular state had said that the card is mandatory... it is a very unfortunate situation,&amp;quot; said Justice Chelameshwar, heading the bench.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The judge asked the attorney-general to verify the reports.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Rohatgi said he would check and get back to the court. &amp;quot;I will ask the states not to do it, we will write to them. As far as we (Centre) are concerned, we are going strictly by the interim order, we have told them &#039;don&#039;t insist&#039;.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The apex court had on September 23, 2013, restrained the government from making the cards mandatory for social welfare schemes until it decided the validity of the scheme that has been challenged as &amp;quot;unconstitutional&amp;quot; in PILs. It reiterated the stay on March 16, 2015.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The three-judge bench today commenced a fresh hearing of the matter that will be spread over two weeks as the earlier presiding judge, Justice B.S. Chauhan, has retired.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Appearing for the Centre, Rohatgi urged the court to refer the matter to a five-judge Constitution bench because it involves complex constitutional questions, including the right to privacy and other freedoms guaranteed to citizens.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bench asked the attorney-general to prepare suitable points for the court to consider whether or not the issue needs to be referred to a larger bench. Rohatgi will present the points tomorrow.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Centre had through an affidavit last week urged the court to vacate its stay on making Aadhaar cards mandatory, pleading that this was affecting social welfare schemes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It said the stay has affected the effective implementation of the Direct Benefits Transfers (DBT). Although financial benefits are now being transferred to bank accounts, the government is unable to locate fake, ghost or duplicate accounts, which it could have &amp;quot;easily done if Aadhaar numbers are provided&amp;quot;, the application said. The government promised all safeguards during the enrolment.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Narendra Modi government told the court it intends to link the Aadhaar cards to obtaining passports, PAN cards, immigration, railways, telecommunications and prison management systems. It said that since the Aadhaar &amp;quot;scheme has been a tremendous success&amp;quot;, the government wants to extend it to all welfare projects.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The stand is in contrast to the BJP&#039;s sharp criticism of Aadhaar - a flagship programme of UPA-II - when the party was in the Opposition. Narendra Modi had in his election speeches described the Aadhaar scheme as a &amp;quot;scam&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The PILs have challenged introduction of Aadhaar by way of an executive order on January 28, 2009, arguing that it violated citizens&#039; fundamental right to privacy.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 28706,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Aadhaar order breach annoys SC&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The Supreme Court today expressed serious concern over some states&#039; insistence on Aadhaar cards to extend social welfare schemes and other common services to citizens despite its two interim orders that the card should not be made mandatory until the court has decided its constitutional validity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A three-judge bench of Justices J. Chelameshwar, S.A. Bobde and C. Nagappan asked attorney-general Mukul Rohatgi to report to it by tomorrow the erring states that continue to insist on Aadhaar cards.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Notwithstanding our interim orders, some of the states are still insisting upon the cards, going by the newspaper reports. Even today in the morning, I saw a newspaper (report) that a very senior officer in a particular state had said that the card is mandatory... it is a very unfortunate situation,&amp;quot; said Justice Chelameshwar, heading the bench.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The judge asked the attorney-general to verify the reports.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rohatgi said he would check and get back to the court. &amp;quot;I will ask the states not to do it, we will write to them. As far as we (Centre) are concerned, we are going strictly by the interim order, we have told them &#039;don&#039;t insist&#039;.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The apex court had on September 23, 2013, restrained the government from making the cards mandatory for social welfare schemes until it decided the validity of the scheme that has been challenged as &amp;quot;unconstitutional&amp;quot; in PILs. It reiterated the stay on March 16, 2015.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The three-judge bench today commenced a fresh hearing of the matter that will be spread over two weeks as the earlier presiding judge, Justice B.S. Chauhan, has retired.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Appearing for the Centre, Rohatgi urged the court to refer the matter to a five-judge Constitution bench because it involves complex constitutional questions, including the right to privacy and other freedoms guaranteed to citizens.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bench asked the attorney-general to prepare suitable points for the court to consider whether or not the issue needs to be referred to a larger bench. Rohatgi will present the points tomorrow.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Centre had through an affidavit last week urged the court to vacate its stay on making Aadhaar cards mandatory, pleading that this was affecting social welfare schemes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It said the stay has affected the effective implementation of the Direct Benefits Transfers (DBT). Although financial benefits are now being transferred to bank accounts, the government is unable to locate fake, ghost or duplicate accounts, which it could have &amp;quot;easily done if Aadhaar numbers are provided&amp;quot;, the application said. The government promised all safeguards during the enrolment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Narendra Modi government told the court it intends to link the Aadhaar cards to obtaining passports, PAN cards, immigration, railways, telecommunications and prison management systems. It said that since the Aadhaar &amp;quot;scheme has been a tremendous success&amp;quot;, the government wants to extend it to all welfare projects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The stand is in contrast to the BJP&#039;s sharp criticism of Aadhaar - a flagship programme of UPA-II - when the party was in the Opposition. Narendra Modi had in his election speeches described the Aadhaar scheme as a &amp;quot;scam&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The PILs have challenged introduction of Aadhaar by way of an executive order on January 28, 2009, arguing that it violated citizens&#039; fundamental right to privacy.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 22 July, 2015, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1150722/jsp/nation/story_33015.jsp#.Va9Q7Pk1t_k&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;aadhaar-order-breach-annoys-sc-4676759&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4676759,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 5 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 6 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 7 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 28706
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Aadhaar order breach annoys SC&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;cash transfer,cash transfers,Direct Benefit Transfer,DBT,aadhaar,uid,Direct Benefits Transfer,Supreme Court&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: The Supreme Court today expressed serious concern over some states&#039; insistence on Aadhaar cards to extend social welfare schemes and other common services to citizens despite its two interim orders that the card should not be made...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The Supreme Court today expressed serious concern over some states&#039; insistence on Aadhaar cards to extend social welfare schemes and other common services to citizens despite its two interim orders that the card should not be made mandatory until the court has decided its constitutional validity.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A three-judge bench of Justices J. Chelameshwar, S.A. Bobde and C. Nagappan asked attorney-general Mukul Rohatgi to report to it by tomorrow the erring states that continue to insist on Aadhaar cards.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Notwithstanding our interim orders, some of the states are still insisting upon the cards, going by the newspaper reports. Even today in the morning, I saw a newspaper (report) that a very senior officer in a particular state had said that the card is mandatory... it is a very unfortunate situation,&amp;quot; said Justice Chelameshwar, heading the bench.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The judge asked the attorney-general to verify the reports.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Rohatgi said he would check and get back to the court. &amp;quot;I will ask the states not to do it, we will write to them. As far as we (Centre) are concerned, we are going strictly by the interim order, we have told them &#039;don&#039;t insist&#039;.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The apex court had on September 23, 2013, restrained the government from making the cards mandatory for social welfare schemes until it decided the validity of the scheme that has been challenged as &amp;quot;unconstitutional&amp;quot; in PILs. It reiterated the stay on March 16, 2015.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The three-judge bench today commenced a fresh hearing of the matter that will be spread over two weeks as the earlier presiding judge, Justice B.S. Chauhan, has retired.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Appearing for the Centre, Rohatgi urged the court to refer the matter to a five-judge Constitution bench because it involves complex constitutional questions, including the right to privacy and other freedoms guaranteed to citizens.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bench asked the attorney-general to prepare suitable points for the court to consider whether or not the issue needs to be referred to a larger bench. Rohatgi will present the points tomorrow.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Centre had through an affidavit last week urged the court to vacate its stay on making Aadhaar cards mandatory, pleading that this was affecting social welfare schemes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It said the stay has affected the effective implementation of the Direct Benefits Transfers (DBT). Although financial benefits are now being transferred to bank accounts, the government is unable to locate fake, ghost or duplicate accounts, which it could have &amp;quot;easily done if Aadhaar numbers are provided&amp;quot;, the application said. The government promised all safeguards during the enrolment.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Narendra Modi government told the court it intends to link the Aadhaar cards to obtaining passports, PAN cards, immigration, railways, telecommunications and prison management systems. It said that since the Aadhaar &amp;quot;scheme has been a tremendous success&amp;quot;, the government wants to extend it to all welfare projects.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The stand is in contrast to the BJP&#039;s sharp criticism of Aadhaar - a flagship programme of UPA-II - when the party was in the Opposition. Narendra Modi had in his election speeches described the Aadhaar scheme as a &amp;quot;scam&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The PILs have challenged introduction of Aadhaar by way of an executive order on January 28, 2009, arguing that it violated citizens&#039; fundamental right to privacy.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/aadhaar-order-breach-annoys-sc-4676759.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Aadhaar order breach annoys SC | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: The Supreme Court today expressed serious concern over some states' insistence on Aadhaar cards to extend social welfare schemes and other common services to citizens despite its two interim orders that the card should not be made..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Aadhaar order breach annoys SC</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><em><br />New Delhi: </em>The Supreme Court today expressed serious concern over some states' insistence on Aadhaar cards to extend social welfare schemes and other common services to citizens despite its two interim orders that the card should not be made mandatory until the court has decided its constitutional validity.<br /><br />A three-judge bench of Justices J. Chelameshwar, S.A. Bobde and C. Nagappan asked attorney-general Mukul Rohatgi to report to it by tomorrow the erring states that continue to insist on Aadhaar cards.<br /><br />&quot;Notwithstanding our interim orders, some of the states are still insisting upon the cards, going by the newspaper reports. Even today in the morning, I saw a newspaper (report) that a very senior officer in a particular state had said that the card is mandatory... it is a very unfortunate situation,&quot; said Justice Chelameshwar, heading the bench.<br /><br />The judge asked the attorney-general to verify the reports.<br /><br />Rohatgi said he would check and get back to the court. &quot;I will ask the states not to do it, we will write to them. As far as we (Centre) are concerned, we are going strictly by the interim order, we have told them 'don't insist'.&quot;<br /><br />The apex court had on September 23, 2013, restrained the government from making the cards mandatory for social welfare schemes until it decided the validity of the scheme that has been challenged as &quot;unconstitutional&quot; in PILs. It reiterated the stay on March 16, 2015.<br /><br />The three-judge bench today commenced a fresh hearing of the matter that will be spread over two weeks as the earlier presiding judge, Justice B.S. Chauhan, has retired.<br /><br />Appearing for the Centre, Rohatgi urged the court to refer the matter to a five-judge Constitution bench because it involves complex constitutional questions, including the right to privacy and other freedoms guaranteed to citizens.<br /><br />The bench asked the attorney-general to prepare suitable points for the court to consider whether or not the issue needs to be referred to a larger bench. Rohatgi will present the points tomorrow.<br /><br />The Centre had through an affidavit last week urged the court to vacate its stay on making Aadhaar cards mandatory, pleading that this was affecting social welfare schemes.<br /><br />It said the stay has affected the effective implementation of the Direct Benefits Transfers (DBT). Although financial benefits are now being transferred to bank accounts, the government is unable to locate fake, ghost or duplicate accounts, which it could have &quot;easily done if Aadhaar numbers are provided&quot;, the application said. The government promised all safeguards during the enrolment.<br /><br />The Narendra Modi government told the court it intends to link the Aadhaar cards to obtaining passports, PAN cards, immigration, railways, telecommunications and prison management systems. It said that since the Aadhaar &quot;scheme has been a tremendous success&quot;, the government wants to extend it to all welfare projects.<br /><br />The stand is in contrast to the BJP's sharp criticism of Aadhaar - a flagship programme of UPA-II - when the party was in the Opposition. Narendra Modi had in his election speeches described the Aadhaar scheme as a &quot;scam&quot;.<br /><br />The PILs have challenged introduction of Aadhaar by way of an executive order on January 28, 2009, arguing that it violated citizens' fundamental right to privacy.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6825d400b5ce1-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6825d400b5ce1-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6825d400b5ce1-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6825d400b5ce1-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6825d400b5ce1-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6825d400b5ce1-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6825d400b5ce1-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6825d400b5ce1-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6825d400b5ce1-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 28706,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Aadhaar order breach annoys SC&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The Supreme Court today expressed serious concern over some states&#039; insistence on Aadhaar cards to extend social welfare schemes and other common services to citizens despite its two interim orders that the card should not be made mandatory until the court has decided its constitutional validity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A three-judge bench of Justices J. Chelameshwar, S.A. Bobde and C. Nagappan asked attorney-general Mukul Rohatgi to report to it by tomorrow the erring states that continue to insist on Aadhaar cards.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Notwithstanding our interim orders, some of the states are still insisting upon the cards, going by the newspaper reports. Even today in the morning, I saw a newspaper (report) that a very senior officer in a particular state had said that the card is mandatory... it is a very unfortunate situation,&amp;quot; said Justice Chelameshwar, heading the bench.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The judge asked the attorney-general to verify the reports.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rohatgi said he would check and get back to the court. &amp;quot;I will ask the states not to do it, we will write to them. As far as we (Centre) are concerned, we are going strictly by the interim order, we have told them &#039;don&#039;t insist&#039;.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The apex court had on September 23, 2013, restrained the government from making the cards mandatory for social welfare schemes until it decided the validity of the scheme that has been challenged as &amp;quot;unconstitutional&amp;quot; in PILs. It reiterated the stay on March 16, 2015.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The three-judge bench today commenced a fresh hearing of the matter that will be spread over two weeks as the earlier presiding judge, Justice B.S. Chauhan, has retired.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Appearing for the Centre, Rohatgi urged the court to refer the matter to a five-judge Constitution bench because it involves complex constitutional questions, including the right to privacy and other freedoms guaranteed to citizens.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bench asked the attorney-general to prepare suitable points for the court to consider whether or not the issue needs to be referred to a larger bench. Rohatgi will present the points tomorrow.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Centre had through an affidavit last week urged the court to vacate its stay on making Aadhaar cards mandatory, pleading that this was affecting social welfare schemes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It said the stay has affected the effective implementation of the Direct Benefits Transfers (DBT). Although financial benefits are now being transferred to bank accounts, the government is unable to locate fake, ghost or duplicate accounts, which it could have &amp;quot;easily done if Aadhaar numbers are provided&amp;quot;, the application said. The government promised all safeguards during the enrolment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Narendra Modi government told the court it intends to link the Aadhaar cards to obtaining passports, PAN cards, immigration, railways, telecommunications and prison management systems. It said that since the Aadhaar &amp;quot;scheme has been a tremendous success&amp;quot;, the government wants to extend it to all welfare projects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The stand is in contrast to the BJP&#039;s sharp criticism of Aadhaar - a flagship programme of UPA-II - when the party was in the Opposition. Narendra Modi had in his election speeches described the Aadhaar scheme as a &amp;quot;scam&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The PILs have challenged introduction of Aadhaar by way of an executive order on January 28, 2009, arguing that it violated citizens&#039; fundamental right to privacy.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 22 July, 2015, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1150722/jsp/nation/story_33015.jsp#.Va9Q7Pk1t_k&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;aadhaar-order-breach-annoys-sc-4676759&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4676759,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 28706,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Aadhaar order breach annoys SC&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;cash transfer,cash transfers,Direct Benefit Transfer,DBT,aadhaar,uid,Direct Benefits Transfer,Supreme Court&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: The Supreme Court today expressed serious concern over some states&#039; insistence on Aadhaar cards to extend social welfare schemes and other common services to citizens despite its two interim orders that the card should not be made...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The Supreme Court today expressed serious concern over some states&#039; insistence on Aadhaar cards to extend social welfare schemes and other common services to citizens despite its two interim orders that the card should not be made mandatory until the court has decided its constitutional validity.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A three-judge bench of Justices J. Chelameshwar, S.A. Bobde and C. Nagappan asked attorney-general Mukul Rohatgi to report to it by tomorrow the erring states that continue to insist on Aadhaar cards.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Notwithstanding our interim orders, some of the states are still insisting upon the cards, going by the newspaper reports. Even today in the morning, I saw a newspaper (report) that a very senior officer in a particular state had said that the card is mandatory... it is a very unfortunate situation,&amp;quot; said Justice Chelameshwar, heading the bench.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The judge asked the attorney-general to verify the reports.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Rohatgi said he would check and get back to the court. &amp;quot;I will ask the states not to do it, we will write to them. As far as we (Centre) are concerned, we are going strictly by the interim order, we have told them &#039;don&#039;t insist&#039;.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The apex court had on September 23, 2013, restrained the government from making the cards mandatory for social welfare schemes until it decided the validity of the scheme that has been challenged as &amp;quot;unconstitutional&amp;quot; in PILs. It reiterated the stay on March 16, 2015.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The three-judge bench today commenced a fresh hearing of the matter that will be spread over two weeks as the earlier presiding judge, Justice B.S. Chauhan, has retired.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Appearing for the Centre, Rohatgi urged the court to refer the matter to a five-judge Constitution bench because it involves complex constitutional questions, including the right to privacy and other freedoms guaranteed to citizens.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bench asked the attorney-general to prepare suitable points for the court to consider whether or not the issue needs to be referred to a larger bench. Rohatgi will present the points tomorrow.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Centre had through an affidavit last week urged the court to vacate its stay on making Aadhaar cards mandatory, pleading that this was affecting social welfare schemes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It said the stay has affected the effective implementation of the Direct Benefits Transfers (DBT). Although financial benefits are now being transferred to bank accounts, the government is unable to locate fake, ghost or duplicate accounts, which it could have &amp;quot;easily done if Aadhaar numbers are provided&amp;quot;, the application said. The government promised all safeguards during the enrolment.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Narendra Modi government told the court it intends to link the Aadhaar cards to obtaining passports, PAN cards, immigration, railways, telecommunications and prison management systems. It said that since the Aadhaar &amp;quot;scheme has been a tremendous success&amp;quot;, the government wants to extend it to all welfare projects.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The stand is in contrast to the BJP&#039;s sharp criticism of Aadhaar - a flagship programme of UPA-II - when the party was in the Opposition. Narendra Modi had in his election speeches described the Aadhaar scheme as a &amp;quot;scam&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The PILs have challenged introduction of Aadhaar by way of an executive order on January 28, 2009, arguing that it violated citizens&#039; fundamental right to privacy.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 28706,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Aadhaar order breach annoys SC&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The Supreme Court today expressed serious concern over some states&#039; insistence on Aadhaar cards to extend social welfare schemes and other common services to citizens despite its two interim orders that the card should not be made mandatory until the court has decided its constitutional validity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A three-judge bench of Justices J. Chelameshwar, S.A. Bobde and C. Nagappan asked attorney-general Mukul Rohatgi to report to it by tomorrow the erring states that continue to insist on Aadhaar cards.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Notwithstanding our interim orders, some of the states are still insisting upon the cards, going by the newspaper reports. Even today in the morning, I saw a newspaper (report) that a very senior officer in a particular state had said that the card is mandatory... it is a very unfortunate situation,&amp;quot; said Justice Chelameshwar, heading the bench.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The judge asked the attorney-general to verify the reports.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rohatgi said he would check and get back to the court. &amp;quot;I will ask the states not to do it, we will write to them. As far as we (Centre) are concerned, we are going strictly by the interim order, we have told them &#039;don&#039;t insist&#039;.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The apex court had on September 23, 2013, restrained the government from making the cards mandatory for social welfare schemes until it decided the validity of the scheme that has been challenged as &amp;quot;unconstitutional&amp;quot; in PILs. It reiterated the stay on March 16, 2015.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The three-judge bench today commenced a fresh hearing of the matter that will be spread over two weeks as the earlier presiding judge, Justice B.S. Chauhan, has retired.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Appearing for the Centre, Rohatgi urged the court to refer the matter to a five-judge Constitution bench because it involves complex constitutional questions, including the right to privacy and other freedoms guaranteed to citizens.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bench asked the attorney-general to prepare suitable points for the court to consider whether or not the issue needs to be referred to a larger bench. Rohatgi will present the points tomorrow.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Centre had through an affidavit last week urged the court to vacate its stay on making Aadhaar cards mandatory, pleading that this was affecting social welfare schemes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It said the stay has affected the effective implementation of the Direct Benefits Transfers (DBT). Although financial benefits are now being transferred to bank accounts, the government is unable to locate fake, ghost or duplicate accounts, which it could have &amp;quot;easily done if Aadhaar numbers are provided&amp;quot;, the application said. The government promised all safeguards during the enrolment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Narendra Modi government told the court it intends to link the Aadhaar cards to obtaining passports, PAN cards, immigration, railways, telecommunications and prison management systems. It said that since the Aadhaar &amp;quot;scheme has been a tremendous success&amp;quot;, the government wants to extend it to all welfare projects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The stand is in contrast to the BJP&#039;s sharp criticism of Aadhaar - a flagship programme of UPA-II - when the party was in the Opposition. Narendra Modi had in his election speeches described the Aadhaar scheme as a &amp;quot;scam&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The PILs have challenged introduction of Aadhaar by way of an executive order on January 28, 2009, arguing that it violated citizens&#039; fundamental right to privacy.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 22 July, 2015, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1150722/jsp/nation/story_33015.jsp#.Va9Q7Pk1t_k&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;aadhaar-order-breach-annoys-sc-4676759&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4676759,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 5 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 6 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 7 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 28706
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Aadhaar order breach annoys SC&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;cash transfer,cash transfers,Direct Benefit Transfer,DBT,aadhaar,uid,Direct Benefits Transfer,Supreme Court&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: The Supreme Court today expressed serious concern over some states&#039; insistence on Aadhaar cards to extend social welfare schemes and other common services to citizens despite its two interim orders that the card should not be made...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The Supreme Court today expressed serious concern over some states&#039; insistence on Aadhaar cards to extend social welfare schemes and other common services to citizens despite its two interim orders that the card should not be made mandatory until the court has decided its constitutional validity.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A three-judge bench of Justices J. Chelameshwar, S.A. Bobde and C. Nagappan asked attorney-general Mukul Rohatgi to report to it by tomorrow the erring states that continue to insist on Aadhaar cards.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Notwithstanding our interim orders, some of the states are still insisting upon the cards, going by the newspaper reports. Even today in the morning, I saw a newspaper (report) that a very senior officer in a particular state had said that the card is mandatory... it is a very unfortunate situation,&amp;quot; said Justice Chelameshwar, heading the bench.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The judge asked the attorney-general to verify the reports.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Rohatgi said he would check and get back to the court. &amp;quot;I will ask the states not to do it, we will write to them. As far as we (Centre) are concerned, we are going strictly by the interim order, we have told them &#039;don&#039;t insist&#039;.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The apex court had on September 23, 2013, restrained the government from making the cards mandatory for social welfare schemes until it decided the validity of the scheme that has been challenged as &amp;quot;unconstitutional&amp;quot; in PILs. It reiterated the stay on March 16, 2015.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The three-judge bench today commenced a fresh hearing of the matter that will be spread over two weeks as the earlier presiding judge, Justice B.S. Chauhan, has retired.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Appearing for the Centre, Rohatgi urged the court to refer the matter to a five-judge Constitution bench because it involves complex constitutional questions, including the right to privacy and other freedoms guaranteed to citizens.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bench asked the attorney-general to prepare suitable points for the court to consider whether or not the issue needs to be referred to a larger bench. Rohatgi will present the points tomorrow.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Centre had through an affidavit last week urged the court to vacate its stay on making Aadhaar cards mandatory, pleading that this was affecting social welfare schemes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It said the stay has affected the effective implementation of the Direct Benefits Transfers (DBT). Although financial benefits are now being transferred to bank accounts, the government is unable to locate fake, ghost or duplicate accounts, which it could have &amp;quot;easily done if Aadhaar numbers are provided&amp;quot;, the application said. The government promised all safeguards during the enrolment.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Narendra Modi government told the court it intends to link the Aadhaar cards to obtaining passports, PAN cards, immigration, railways, telecommunications and prison management systems. It said that since the Aadhaar &amp;quot;scheme has been a tremendous success&amp;quot;, the government wants to extend it to all welfare projects.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The stand is in contrast to the BJP&#039;s sharp criticism of Aadhaar - a flagship programme of UPA-II - when the party was in the Opposition. Narendra Modi had in his election speeches described the Aadhaar scheme as a &amp;quot;scam&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The PILs have challenged introduction of Aadhaar by way of an executive order on January 28, 2009, arguing that it violated citizens&#039; fundamental right to privacy.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/aadhaar-order-breach-annoys-sc-4676759.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Aadhaar order breach annoys SC | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: The Supreme Court today expressed serious concern over some states' insistence on Aadhaar cards to extend social welfare schemes and other common services to citizens despite its two interim orders that the card should not be made..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Aadhaar order breach annoys SC</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><em><br />New Delhi: </em>The Supreme Court today expressed serious concern over some states' insistence on Aadhaar cards to extend social welfare schemes and other common services to citizens despite its two interim orders that the card should not be made mandatory until the court has decided its constitutional validity.<br /><br />A three-judge bench of Justices J. Chelameshwar, S.A. Bobde and C. Nagappan asked attorney-general Mukul Rohatgi to report to it by tomorrow the erring states that continue to insist on Aadhaar cards.<br /><br />&quot;Notwithstanding our interim orders, some of the states are still insisting upon the cards, going by the newspaper reports. Even today in the morning, I saw a newspaper (report) that a very senior officer in a particular state had said that the card is mandatory... it is a very unfortunate situation,&quot; said Justice Chelameshwar, heading the bench.<br /><br />The judge asked the attorney-general to verify the reports.<br /><br />Rohatgi said he would check and get back to the court. &quot;I will ask the states not to do it, we will write to them. As far as we (Centre) are concerned, we are going strictly by the interim order, we have told them 'don't insist'.&quot;<br /><br />The apex court had on September 23, 2013, restrained the government from making the cards mandatory for social welfare schemes until it decided the validity of the scheme that has been challenged as &quot;unconstitutional&quot; in PILs. It reiterated the stay on March 16, 2015.<br /><br />The three-judge bench today commenced a fresh hearing of the matter that will be spread over two weeks as the earlier presiding judge, Justice B.S. Chauhan, has retired.<br /><br />Appearing for the Centre, Rohatgi urged the court to refer the matter to a five-judge Constitution bench because it involves complex constitutional questions, including the right to privacy and other freedoms guaranteed to citizens.<br /><br />The bench asked the attorney-general to prepare suitable points for the court to consider whether or not the issue needs to be referred to a larger bench. Rohatgi will present the points tomorrow.<br /><br />The Centre had through an affidavit last week urged the court to vacate its stay on making Aadhaar cards mandatory, pleading that this was affecting social welfare schemes.<br /><br />It said the stay has affected the effective implementation of the Direct Benefits Transfers (DBT). Although financial benefits are now being transferred to bank accounts, the government is unable to locate fake, ghost or duplicate accounts, which it could have &quot;easily done if Aadhaar numbers are provided&quot;, the application said. The government promised all safeguards during the enrolment.<br /><br />The Narendra Modi government told the court it intends to link the Aadhaar cards to obtaining passports, PAN cards, immigration, railways, telecommunications and prison management systems. It said that since the Aadhaar &quot;scheme has been a tremendous success&quot;, the government wants to extend it to all welfare projects.<br /><br />The stand is in contrast to the BJP's sharp criticism of Aadhaar - a flagship programme of UPA-II - when the party was in the Opposition. Narendra Modi had in his election speeches described the Aadhaar scheme as a &quot;scam&quot;.<br /><br />The PILs have challenged introduction of Aadhaar by way of an executive order on January 28, 2009, arguing that it violated citizens' fundamental right to privacy.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6825d400b5ce1-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6825d400b5ce1-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6825d400b5ce1-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6825d400b5ce1-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6825d400b5ce1-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6825d400b5ce1-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6825d400b5ce1-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6825d400b5ce1-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6825d400b5ce1-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 28706,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Aadhaar order breach annoys SC&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The Supreme Court today expressed serious concern over some states&#039; insistence on Aadhaar cards to extend social welfare schemes and other common services to citizens despite its two interim orders that the card should not be made mandatory until the court has decided its constitutional validity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A three-judge bench of Justices J. Chelameshwar, S.A. Bobde and C. Nagappan asked attorney-general Mukul Rohatgi to report to it by tomorrow the erring states that continue to insist on Aadhaar cards.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Notwithstanding our interim orders, some of the states are still insisting upon the cards, going by the newspaper reports. Even today in the morning, I saw a newspaper (report) that a very senior officer in a particular state had said that the card is mandatory... it is a very unfortunate situation,&amp;quot; said Justice Chelameshwar, heading the bench.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The judge asked the attorney-general to verify the reports.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rohatgi said he would check and get back to the court. &amp;quot;I will ask the states not to do it, we will write to them. As far as we (Centre) are concerned, we are going strictly by the interim order, we have told them &#039;don&#039;t insist&#039;.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The apex court had on September 23, 2013, restrained the government from making the cards mandatory for social welfare schemes until it decided the validity of the scheme that has been challenged as &amp;quot;unconstitutional&amp;quot; in PILs. It reiterated the stay on March 16, 2015.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The three-judge bench today commenced a fresh hearing of the matter that will be spread over two weeks as the earlier presiding judge, Justice B.S. Chauhan, has retired.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Appearing for the Centre, Rohatgi urged the court to refer the matter to a five-judge Constitution bench because it involves complex constitutional questions, including the right to privacy and other freedoms guaranteed to citizens.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bench asked the attorney-general to prepare suitable points for the court to consider whether or not the issue needs to be referred to a larger bench. Rohatgi will present the points tomorrow.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Centre had through an affidavit last week urged the court to vacate its stay on making Aadhaar cards mandatory, pleading that this was affecting social welfare schemes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It said the stay has affected the effective implementation of the Direct Benefits Transfers (DBT). Although financial benefits are now being transferred to bank accounts, the government is unable to locate fake, ghost or duplicate accounts, which it could have &amp;quot;easily done if Aadhaar numbers are provided&amp;quot;, the application said. The government promised all safeguards during the enrolment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Narendra Modi government told the court it intends to link the Aadhaar cards to obtaining passports, PAN cards, immigration, railways, telecommunications and prison management systems. It said that since the Aadhaar &amp;quot;scheme has been a tremendous success&amp;quot;, the government wants to extend it to all welfare projects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The stand is in contrast to the BJP&#039;s sharp criticism of Aadhaar - a flagship programme of UPA-II - when the party was in the Opposition. Narendra Modi had in his election speeches described the Aadhaar scheme as a &amp;quot;scam&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The PILs have challenged introduction of Aadhaar by way of an executive order on January 28, 2009, arguing that it violated citizens&#039; fundamental right to privacy.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 22 July, 2015, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1150722/jsp/nation/story_33015.jsp#.Va9Q7Pk1t_k&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;aadhaar-order-breach-annoys-sc-4676759&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4676759,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 28706,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Aadhaar order breach annoys SC&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;cash transfer,cash transfers,Direct Benefit Transfer,DBT,aadhaar,uid,Direct Benefits Transfer,Supreme Court&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: The Supreme Court today expressed serious concern over some states&#039; insistence on Aadhaar cards to extend social welfare schemes and other common services to citizens despite its two interim orders that the card should not be made...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The Supreme Court today expressed serious concern over some states&#039; insistence on Aadhaar cards to extend social welfare schemes and other common services to citizens despite its two interim orders that the card should not be made mandatory until the court has decided its constitutional validity.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A three-judge bench of Justices J. Chelameshwar, S.A. Bobde and C. Nagappan asked attorney-general Mukul Rohatgi to report to it by tomorrow the erring states that continue to insist on Aadhaar cards.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Notwithstanding our interim orders, some of the states are still insisting upon the cards, going by the newspaper reports. Even today in the morning, I saw a newspaper (report) that a very senior officer in a particular state had said that the card is mandatory... it is a very unfortunate situation,&amp;quot; said Justice Chelameshwar, heading the bench.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The judge asked the attorney-general to verify the reports.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Rohatgi said he would check and get back to the court. &amp;quot;I will ask the states not to do it, we will write to them. As far as we (Centre) are concerned, we are going strictly by the interim order, we have told them &#039;don&#039;t insist&#039;.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The apex court had on September 23, 2013, restrained the government from making the cards mandatory for social welfare schemes until it decided the validity of the scheme that has been challenged as &amp;quot;unconstitutional&amp;quot; in PILs. It reiterated the stay on March 16, 2015.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The three-judge bench today commenced a fresh hearing of the matter that will be spread over two weeks as the earlier presiding judge, Justice B.S. Chauhan, has retired.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Appearing for the Centre, Rohatgi urged the court to refer the matter to a five-judge Constitution bench because it involves complex constitutional questions, including the right to privacy and other freedoms guaranteed to citizens.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bench asked the attorney-general to prepare suitable points for the court to consider whether or not the issue needs to be referred to a larger bench. Rohatgi will present the points tomorrow.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Centre had through an affidavit last week urged the court to vacate its stay on making Aadhaar cards mandatory, pleading that this was affecting social welfare schemes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It said the stay has affected the effective implementation of the Direct Benefits Transfers (DBT). Although financial benefits are now being transferred to bank accounts, the government is unable to locate fake, ghost or duplicate accounts, which it could have &amp;quot;easily done if Aadhaar numbers are provided&amp;quot;, the application said. The government promised all safeguards during the enrolment.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Narendra Modi government told the court it intends to link the Aadhaar cards to obtaining passports, PAN cards, immigration, railways, telecommunications and prison management systems. It said that since the Aadhaar &amp;quot;scheme has been a tremendous success&amp;quot;, the government wants to extend it to all welfare projects.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The stand is in contrast to the BJP&#039;s sharp criticism of Aadhaar - a flagship programme of UPA-II - when the party was in the Opposition. Narendra Modi had in his election speeches described the Aadhaar scheme as a &amp;quot;scam&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The PILs have challenged introduction of Aadhaar by way of an executive order on January 28, 2009, arguing that it violated citizens&#039; fundamental right to privacy.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 28706,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Aadhaar order breach annoys SC&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The Supreme Court today expressed serious concern over some states&#039; insistence on Aadhaar cards to extend social welfare schemes and other common services to citizens despite its two interim orders that the card should not be made mandatory until the court has decided its constitutional validity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A three-judge bench of Justices J. Chelameshwar, S.A. Bobde and C. Nagappan asked attorney-general Mukul Rohatgi to report to it by tomorrow the erring states that continue to insist on Aadhaar cards.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Notwithstanding our interim orders, some of the states are still insisting upon the cards, going by the newspaper reports. Even today in the morning, I saw a newspaper (report) that a very senior officer in a particular state had said that the card is mandatory... it is a very unfortunate situation,&amp;quot; said Justice Chelameshwar, heading the bench.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The judge asked the attorney-general to verify the reports.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rohatgi said he would check and get back to the court. &amp;quot;I will ask the states not to do it, we will write to them. As far as we (Centre) are concerned, we are going strictly by the interim order, we have told them &#039;don&#039;t insist&#039;.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The apex court had on September 23, 2013, restrained the government from making the cards mandatory for social welfare schemes until it decided the validity of the scheme that has been challenged as &amp;quot;unconstitutional&amp;quot; in PILs. It reiterated the stay on March 16, 2015.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The three-judge bench today commenced a fresh hearing of the matter that will be spread over two weeks as the earlier presiding judge, Justice B.S. Chauhan, has retired.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Appearing for the Centre, Rohatgi urged the court to refer the matter to a five-judge Constitution bench because it involves complex constitutional questions, including the right to privacy and other freedoms guaranteed to citizens.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bench asked the attorney-general to prepare suitable points for the court to consider whether or not the issue needs to be referred to a larger bench. Rohatgi will present the points tomorrow.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Centre had through an affidavit last week urged the court to vacate its stay on making Aadhaar cards mandatory, pleading that this was affecting social welfare schemes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It said the stay has affected the effective implementation of the Direct Benefits Transfers (DBT). Although financial benefits are now being transferred to bank accounts, the government is unable to locate fake, ghost or duplicate accounts, which it could have &amp;quot;easily done if Aadhaar numbers are provided&amp;quot;, the application said. The government promised all safeguards during the enrolment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Narendra Modi government told the court it intends to link the Aadhaar cards to obtaining passports, PAN cards, immigration, railways, telecommunications and prison management systems. It said that since the Aadhaar &amp;quot;scheme has been a tremendous success&amp;quot;, the government wants to extend it to all welfare projects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The stand is in contrast to the BJP&#039;s sharp criticism of Aadhaar - a flagship programme of UPA-II - when the party was in the Opposition. Narendra Modi had in his election speeches described the Aadhaar scheme as a &amp;quot;scam&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The PILs have challenged introduction of Aadhaar by way of an executive order on January 28, 2009, arguing that it violated citizens&#039; fundamental right to privacy.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 22 July, 2015, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1150722/jsp/nation/story_33015.jsp#.Va9Q7Pk1t_k&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;aadhaar-order-breach-annoys-sc-4676759&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4676759,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 5 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 6 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 7 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 28706
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Aadhaar order breach annoys SC&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;cash transfer,cash transfers,Direct Benefit Transfer,DBT,aadhaar,uid,Direct Benefits Transfer,Supreme Court&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: The Supreme Court today expressed serious concern over some states&#039; insistence on Aadhaar cards to extend social welfare schemes and other common services to citizens despite its two interim orders that the card should not be made...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The Supreme Court today expressed serious concern over some states&#039; insistence on Aadhaar cards to extend social welfare schemes and other common services to citizens despite its two interim orders that the card should not be made mandatory until the court has decided its constitutional validity.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A three-judge bench of Justices J. Chelameshwar, S.A. Bobde and C. Nagappan asked attorney-general Mukul Rohatgi to report to it by tomorrow the erring states that continue to insist on Aadhaar cards.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Notwithstanding our interim orders, some of the states are still insisting upon the cards, going by the newspaper reports. Even today in the morning, I saw a newspaper (report) that a very senior officer in a particular state had said that the card is mandatory... it is a very unfortunate situation,&amp;quot; said Justice Chelameshwar, heading the bench.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The judge asked the attorney-general to verify the reports.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Rohatgi said he would check and get back to the court. &amp;quot;I will ask the states not to do it, we will write to them. As far as we (Centre) are concerned, we are going strictly by the interim order, we have told them &#039;don&#039;t insist&#039;.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The apex court had on September 23, 2013, restrained the government from making the cards mandatory for social welfare schemes until it decided the validity of the scheme that has been challenged as &amp;quot;unconstitutional&amp;quot; in PILs. It reiterated the stay on March 16, 2015.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The three-judge bench today commenced a fresh hearing of the matter that will be spread over two weeks as the earlier presiding judge, Justice B.S. Chauhan, has retired.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Appearing for the Centre, Rohatgi urged the court to refer the matter to a five-judge Constitution bench because it involves complex constitutional questions, including the right to privacy and other freedoms guaranteed to citizens.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bench asked the attorney-general to prepare suitable points for the court to consider whether or not the issue needs to be referred to a larger bench. Rohatgi will present the points tomorrow.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Centre had through an affidavit last week urged the court to vacate its stay on making Aadhaar cards mandatory, pleading that this was affecting social welfare schemes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It said the stay has affected the effective implementation of the Direct Benefits Transfers (DBT). Although financial benefits are now being transferred to bank accounts, the government is unable to locate fake, ghost or duplicate accounts, which it could have &amp;quot;easily done if Aadhaar numbers are provided&amp;quot;, the application said. The government promised all safeguards during the enrolment.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Narendra Modi government told the court it intends to link the Aadhaar cards to obtaining passports, PAN cards, immigration, railways, telecommunications and prison management systems. It said that since the Aadhaar &amp;quot;scheme has been a tremendous success&amp;quot;, the government wants to extend it to all welfare projects.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The stand is in contrast to the BJP&#039;s sharp criticism of Aadhaar - a flagship programme of UPA-II - when the party was in the Opposition. Narendra Modi had in his election speeches described the Aadhaar scheme as a &amp;quot;scam&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The PILs have challenged introduction of Aadhaar by way of an executive order on January 28, 2009, arguing that it violated citizens&#039; fundamental right to privacy.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/aadhaar-order-breach-annoys-sc-4676759.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Aadhaar order breach annoys SC | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: The Supreme Court today expressed serious concern over some states' insistence on Aadhaar cards to extend social welfare schemes and other common services to citizens despite its two interim orders that the card should not be made..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Aadhaar order breach annoys SC</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><em><br />New Delhi: </em>The Supreme Court today expressed serious concern over some states' insistence on Aadhaar cards to extend social welfare schemes and other common services to citizens despite its two interim orders that the card should not be made mandatory until the court has decided its constitutional validity.<br /><br />A three-judge bench of Justices J. Chelameshwar, S.A. Bobde and C. Nagappan asked attorney-general Mukul Rohatgi to report to it by tomorrow the erring states that continue to insist on Aadhaar cards.<br /><br />&quot;Notwithstanding our interim orders, some of the states are still insisting upon the cards, going by the newspaper reports. Even today in the morning, I saw a newspaper (report) that a very senior officer in a particular state had said that the card is mandatory... it is a very unfortunate situation,&quot; said Justice Chelameshwar, heading the bench.<br /><br />The judge asked the attorney-general to verify the reports.<br /><br />Rohatgi said he would check and get back to the court. &quot;I will ask the states not to do it, we will write to them. As far as we (Centre) are concerned, we are going strictly by the interim order, we have told them 'don't insist'.&quot;<br /><br />The apex court had on September 23, 2013, restrained the government from making the cards mandatory for social welfare schemes until it decided the validity of the scheme that has been challenged as &quot;unconstitutional&quot; in PILs. It reiterated the stay on March 16, 2015.<br /><br />The three-judge bench today commenced a fresh hearing of the matter that will be spread over two weeks as the earlier presiding judge, Justice B.S. Chauhan, has retired.<br /><br />Appearing for the Centre, Rohatgi urged the court to refer the matter to a five-judge Constitution bench because it involves complex constitutional questions, including the right to privacy and other freedoms guaranteed to citizens.<br /><br />The bench asked the attorney-general to prepare suitable points for the court to consider whether or not the issue needs to be referred to a larger bench. Rohatgi will present the points tomorrow.<br /><br />The Centre had through an affidavit last week urged the court to vacate its stay on making Aadhaar cards mandatory, pleading that this was affecting social welfare schemes.<br /><br />It said the stay has affected the effective implementation of the Direct Benefits Transfers (DBT). Although financial benefits are now being transferred to bank accounts, the government is unable to locate fake, ghost or duplicate accounts, which it could have &quot;easily done if Aadhaar numbers are provided&quot;, the application said. The government promised all safeguards during the enrolment.<br /><br />The Narendra Modi government told the court it intends to link the Aadhaar cards to obtaining passports, PAN cards, immigration, railways, telecommunications and prison management systems. It said that since the Aadhaar &quot;scheme has been a tremendous success&quot;, the government wants to extend it to all welfare projects.<br /><br />The stand is in contrast to the BJP's sharp criticism of Aadhaar - a flagship programme of UPA-II - when the party was in the Opposition. Narendra Modi had in his election speeches described the Aadhaar scheme as a &quot;scam&quot;.<br /><br />The PILs have challenged introduction of Aadhaar by way of an executive order on January 28, 2009, arguing that it violated citizens' fundamental right to privacy.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 28706,
		'title' => 'Aadhaar order breach annoys SC',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Telegraph<br />
<em><br />
New Delhi: </em>The Supreme Court today expressed serious concern over some states' insistence on Aadhaar cards to extend social welfare schemes and other common services to citizens despite its two interim orders that the card should not be made mandatory until the court has decided its constitutional validity.<br />
<br />
A three-judge bench of Justices J. Chelameshwar, S.A. Bobde and C. Nagappan asked attorney-general Mukul Rohatgi to report to it by tomorrow the erring states that continue to insist on Aadhaar cards.<br />
<br />
&quot;Notwithstanding our interim orders, some of the states are still insisting upon the cards, going by the newspaper reports. Even today in the morning, I saw a newspaper (report) that a very senior officer in a particular state had said that the card is mandatory... it is a very unfortunate situation,&quot; said Justice Chelameshwar, heading the bench.<br />
<br />
The judge asked the attorney-general to verify the reports.<br />
<br />
Rohatgi said he would check and get back to the court. &quot;I will ask the states not to do it, we will write to them. As far as we (Centre) are concerned, we are going strictly by the interim order, we have told them 'don't insist'.&quot;<br />
<br />
The apex court had on September 23, 2013, restrained the government from making the cards mandatory for social welfare schemes until it decided the validity of the scheme that has been challenged as &quot;unconstitutional&quot; in PILs. It reiterated the stay on March 16, 2015.<br />
<br />
The three-judge bench today commenced a fresh hearing of the matter that will be spread over two weeks as the earlier presiding judge, Justice B.S. Chauhan, has retired.<br />
<br />
Appearing for the Centre, Rohatgi urged the court to refer the matter to a five-judge Constitution bench because it involves complex constitutional questions, including the right to privacy and other freedoms guaranteed to citizens.<br />
<br />
The bench asked the attorney-general to prepare suitable points for the court to consider whether or not the issue needs to be referred to a larger bench. Rohatgi will present the points tomorrow.<br />
<br />
The Centre had through an affidavit last week urged the court to vacate its stay on making Aadhaar cards mandatory, pleading that this was affecting social welfare schemes.<br />
<br />
It said the stay has affected the effective implementation of the Direct Benefits Transfers (DBT). Although financial benefits are now being transferred to bank accounts, the government is unable to locate fake, ghost or duplicate accounts, which it could have &quot;easily done if Aadhaar numbers are provided&quot;, the application said. The government promised all safeguards during the enrolment.<br />
<br />
The Narendra Modi government told the court it intends to link the Aadhaar cards to obtaining passports, PAN cards, immigration, railways, telecommunications and prison management systems. It said that since the Aadhaar &quot;scheme has been a tremendous success&quot;, the government wants to extend it to all welfare projects.<br />
<br />
The stand is in contrast to the BJP's sharp criticism of Aadhaar - a flagship programme of UPA-II - when the party was in the Opposition. Narendra Modi had in his election speeches described the Aadhaar scheme as a &quot;scam&quot;.<br />
<br />
The PILs have challenged introduction of Aadhaar by way of an executive order on January 28, 2009, arguing that it violated citizens' fundamental right to privacy.
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 22 July, 2015, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1150722/jsp/nation/story_33015.jsp#.Va9Q7Pk1t_k',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'aadhaar-order-breach-annoys-sc-4676759',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 4676759,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 28706,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Aadhaar order breach annoys SC',
	'metaKeywords' => 'cash transfer,cash transfers,Direct Benefit Transfer,DBT,aadhaar,uid,Direct Benefits Transfer,Supreme Court',
	'metaDesc' => '
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: The Supreme Court today expressed serious concern over some states' insistence on Aadhaar cards to extend social welfare schemes and other common services to citizens despite its two interim orders that the card should not be made...',
	'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><em><br />New Delhi: </em>The Supreme Court today expressed serious concern over some states' insistence on Aadhaar cards to extend social welfare schemes and other common services to citizens despite its two interim orders that the card should not be made mandatory until the court has decided its constitutional validity.<br /><br />A three-judge bench of Justices J. Chelameshwar, S.A. Bobde and C. Nagappan asked attorney-general Mukul Rohatgi to report to it by tomorrow the erring states that continue to insist on Aadhaar cards.<br /><br />&quot;Notwithstanding our interim orders, some of the states are still insisting upon the cards, going by the newspaper reports. Even today in the morning, I saw a newspaper (report) that a very senior officer in a particular state had said that the card is mandatory... it is a very unfortunate situation,&quot; said Justice Chelameshwar, heading the bench.<br /><br />The judge asked the attorney-general to verify the reports.<br /><br />Rohatgi said he would check and get back to the court. &quot;I will ask the states not to do it, we will write to them. As far as we (Centre) are concerned, we are going strictly by the interim order, we have told them 'don't insist'.&quot;<br /><br />The apex court had on September 23, 2013, restrained the government from making the cards mandatory for social welfare schemes until it decided the validity of the scheme that has been challenged as &quot;unconstitutional&quot; in PILs. It reiterated the stay on March 16, 2015.<br /><br />The three-judge bench today commenced a fresh hearing of the matter that will be spread over two weeks as the earlier presiding judge, Justice B.S. Chauhan, has retired.<br /><br />Appearing for the Centre, Rohatgi urged the court to refer the matter to a five-judge Constitution bench because it involves complex constitutional questions, including the right to privacy and other freedoms guaranteed to citizens.<br /><br />The bench asked the attorney-general to prepare suitable points for the court to consider whether or not the issue needs to be referred to a larger bench. Rohatgi will present the points tomorrow.<br /><br />The Centre had through an affidavit last week urged the court to vacate its stay on making Aadhaar cards mandatory, pleading that this was affecting social welfare schemes.<br /><br />It said the stay has affected the effective implementation of the Direct Benefits Transfers (DBT). Although financial benefits are now being transferred to bank accounts, the government is unable to locate fake, ghost or duplicate accounts, which it could have &quot;easily done if Aadhaar numbers are provided&quot;, the application said. The government promised all safeguards during the enrolment.<br /><br />The Narendra Modi government told the court it intends to link the Aadhaar cards to obtaining passports, PAN cards, immigration, railways, telecommunications and prison management systems. It said that since the Aadhaar &quot;scheme has been a tremendous success&quot;, the government wants to extend it to all welfare projects.<br /><br />The stand is in contrast to the BJP's sharp criticism of Aadhaar - a flagship programme of UPA-II - when the party was in the Opposition. Narendra Modi had in his election speeches described the Aadhaar scheme as a &quot;scam&quot;.<br /><br />The PILs have challenged introduction of Aadhaar by way of an executive order on January 28, 2009, arguing that it violated citizens' fundamental right to privacy.</div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 28706,
	'title' => 'Aadhaar order breach annoys SC',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Telegraph<br />
<em><br />
New Delhi: </em>The Supreme Court today expressed serious concern over some states' insistence on Aadhaar cards to extend social welfare schemes and other common services to citizens despite its two interim orders that the card should not be made mandatory until the court has decided its constitutional validity.<br />
<br />
A three-judge bench of Justices J. Chelameshwar, S.A. Bobde and C. Nagappan asked attorney-general Mukul Rohatgi to report to it by tomorrow the erring states that continue to insist on Aadhaar cards.<br />
<br />
&quot;Notwithstanding our interim orders, some of the states are still insisting upon the cards, going by the newspaper reports. Even today in the morning, I saw a newspaper (report) that a very senior officer in a particular state had said that the card is mandatory... it is a very unfortunate situation,&quot; said Justice Chelameshwar, heading the bench.<br />
<br />
The judge asked the attorney-general to verify the reports.<br />
<br />
Rohatgi said he would check and get back to the court. &quot;I will ask the states not to do it, we will write to them. As far as we (Centre) are concerned, we are going strictly by the interim order, we have told them 'don't insist'.&quot;<br />
<br />
The apex court had on September 23, 2013, restrained the government from making the cards mandatory for social welfare schemes until it decided the validity of the scheme that has been challenged as &quot;unconstitutional&quot; in PILs. It reiterated the stay on March 16, 2015.<br />
<br />
The three-judge bench today commenced a fresh hearing of the matter that will be spread over two weeks as the earlier presiding judge, Justice B.S. Chauhan, has retired.<br />
<br />
Appearing for the Centre, Rohatgi urged the court to refer the matter to a five-judge Constitution bench because it involves complex constitutional questions, including the right to privacy and other freedoms guaranteed to citizens.<br />
<br />
The bench asked the attorney-general to prepare suitable points for the court to consider whether or not the issue needs to be referred to a larger bench. Rohatgi will present the points tomorrow.<br />
<br />
The Centre had through an affidavit last week urged the court to vacate its stay on making Aadhaar cards mandatory, pleading that this was affecting social welfare schemes.<br />
<br />
It said the stay has affected the effective implementation of the Direct Benefits Transfers (DBT). Although financial benefits are now being transferred to bank accounts, the government is unable to locate fake, ghost or duplicate accounts, which it could have &quot;easily done if Aadhaar numbers are provided&quot;, the application said. The government promised all safeguards during the enrolment.<br />
<br />
The Narendra Modi government told the court it intends to link the Aadhaar cards to obtaining passports, PAN cards, immigration, railways, telecommunications and prison management systems. It said that since the Aadhaar &quot;scheme has been a tremendous success&quot;, the government wants to extend it to all welfare projects.<br />
<br />
The stand is in contrast to the BJP's sharp criticism of Aadhaar - a flagship programme of UPA-II - when the party was in the Opposition. Narendra Modi had in his election speeches described the Aadhaar scheme as a &quot;scam&quot;.<br />
<br />
The PILs have challenged introduction of Aadhaar by way of an executive order on January 28, 2009, arguing that it violated citizens' fundamental right to privacy.
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 22 July, 2015, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1150722/jsp/nation/story_33015.jsp#.Va9Q7Pk1t_k',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'aadhaar-order-breach-annoys-sc-4676759',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 4676759,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 5 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 6 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 7 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 28706
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Aadhaar order breach annoys SC'
$metaKeywords = 'cash transfer,cash transfers,Direct Benefit Transfer,DBT,aadhaar,uid,Direct Benefits Transfer,Supreme Court'
$metaDesc = '
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: The Supreme Court today expressed serious concern over some states' insistence on Aadhaar cards to extend social welfare schemes and other common services to citizens despite its two interim orders that the card should not be made...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><em><br />New Delhi: </em>The Supreme Court today expressed serious concern over some states' insistence on Aadhaar cards to extend social welfare schemes and other common services to citizens despite its two interim orders that the card should not be made mandatory until the court has decided its constitutional validity.<br /><br />A three-judge bench of Justices J. Chelameshwar, S.A. Bobde and C. Nagappan asked attorney-general Mukul Rohatgi to report to it by tomorrow the erring states that continue to insist on Aadhaar cards.<br /><br />&quot;Notwithstanding our interim orders, some of the states are still insisting upon the cards, going by the newspaper reports. Even today in the morning, I saw a newspaper (report) that a very senior officer in a particular state had said that the card is mandatory... it is a very unfortunate situation,&quot; said Justice Chelameshwar, heading the bench.<br /><br />The judge asked the attorney-general to verify the reports.<br /><br />Rohatgi said he would check and get back to the court. &quot;I will ask the states not to do it, we will write to them. As far as we (Centre) are concerned, we are going strictly by the interim order, we have told them 'don't insist'.&quot;<br /><br />The apex court had on September 23, 2013, restrained the government from making the cards mandatory for social welfare schemes until it decided the validity of the scheme that has been challenged as &quot;unconstitutional&quot; in PILs. It reiterated the stay on March 16, 2015.<br /><br />The three-judge bench today commenced a fresh hearing of the matter that will be spread over two weeks as the earlier presiding judge, Justice B.S. Chauhan, has retired.<br /><br />Appearing for the Centre, Rohatgi urged the court to refer the matter to a five-judge Constitution bench because it involves complex constitutional questions, including the right to privacy and other freedoms guaranteed to citizens.<br /><br />The bench asked the attorney-general to prepare suitable points for the court to consider whether or not the issue needs to be referred to a larger bench. Rohatgi will present the points tomorrow.<br /><br />The Centre had through an affidavit last week urged the court to vacate its stay on making Aadhaar cards mandatory, pleading that this was affecting social welfare schemes.<br /><br />It said the stay has affected the effective implementation of the Direct Benefits Transfers (DBT). Although financial benefits are now being transferred to bank accounts, the government is unable to locate fake, ghost or duplicate accounts, which it could have &quot;easily done if Aadhaar numbers are provided&quot;, the application said. The government promised all safeguards during the enrolment.<br /><br />The Narendra Modi government told the court it intends to link the Aadhaar cards to obtaining passports, PAN cards, immigration, railways, telecommunications and prison management systems. It said that since the Aadhaar &quot;scheme has been a tremendous success&quot;, the government wants to extend it to all welfare projects.<br /><br />The stand is in contrast to the BJP's sharp criticism of Aadhaar - a flagship programme of UPA-II - when the party was in the Opposition. Narendra Modi had in his election speeches described the Aadhaar scheme as a &quot;scam&quot;.<br /><br />The PILs have challenged introduction of Aadhaar by way of an executive order on January 28, 2009, arguing that it violated citizens' fundamental right to privacy.</div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

Aadhaar order breach annoys SC

-The Telegraph New Delhi: The Supreme Court today expressed serious concern over some states' insistence on Aadhaar cards to extend social welfare schemes and other common services to citizens despite its two interim orders that the card should not be made mandatory until the court has decided its constitutional validity. A three-judge bench of Justices J. Chelameshwar, S.A. Bobde and C. Nagappan asked attorney-general Mukul Rohatgi to report to it by tomorrow the erring states that continue to insist on Aadhaar cards. "Notwithstanding our interim orders, some of the states are still insisting upon the cards, going by the newspaper reports. Even today in the morning, I saw a newspaper (report) that a very senior officer in a particular state had said that the card is mandatory... it is a very unfortunate situation," said Justice Chelameshwar, heading the bench. The judge asked the attorney-general to verify the reports. Rohatgi said he would check and get back to the court. "I will ask the states not to do it, we will write to them. As far as we (Centre) are concerned, we are going strictly by the interim order, we have told them 'don't insist'." The apex court had on September 23, 2013, restrained the government from making the cards mandatory for social welfare schemes until it decided the validity of the scheme that has been challenged as "unconstitutional" in PILs. It reiterated the stay on March 16, 2015. The three-judge bench today commenced a fresh hearing of the matter that will be spread over two weeks as the earlier presiding judge, Justice B.S. Chauhan, has retired. Appearing for the Centre, Rohatgi urged the court to refer the matter to a five-judge Constitution bench because it involves complex constitutional questions, including the right to privacy and other freedoms guaranteed to citizens. The bench asked the attorney-general to prepare suitable points for the court to consider whether or not the issue needs to be referred to a larger bench. Rohatgi will present the points tomorrow. The Centre had through an affidavit last week urged the court to vacate its stay on making Aadhaar cards mandatory, pleading that this was affecting social welfare schemes. It said the stay has affected the effective implementation of the Direct Benefits Transfers (DBT). Although financial benefits are now being transferred to bank accounts, the government is unable to locate fake, ghost or duplicate accounts, which it could have "easily done if Aadhaar numbers are provided", the application said. The government promised all safeguards during the enrolment. The Narendra Modi government told the court it intends to link the Aadhaar cards to obtaining passports, PAN cards, immigration, railways, telecommunications and prison management systems. It said that since the Aadhaar "scheme has been a tremendous success", the government wants to extend it to all welfare projects. The stand is in contrast to the BJP's sharp criticism of Aadhaar - a flagship programme of UPA-II - when the party was in the Opposition. Narendra Modi had in his election speeches described the Aadhaar scheme as a "scam". The PILs have challenged introduction of Aadhaar by way of an executive order on January 28, 2009, arguing that it violated citizens' fundamental right to privacy.