Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/abortion-law-plan-stirs-concern-4676504/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/abortion-law-plan-stirs-concern-4676504/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/abortion-law-plan-stirs-concern-4676504/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/abortion-law-plan-stirs-concern-4676504/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68056245642b3-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68056245642b3-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68056245642b3-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68056245642b3-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68056245642b3-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68056245642b3-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68056245642b3-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68056245642b3-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68056245642b3-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 28452, 'title' => 'Abortion law plan stirs concern', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Telegraph<br /> <br /> <em>New Delhi: </em>The health ministry's proposals to amend the abortion law have contradictory clauses that could force women to take unjustified decisions about their foetuses, a Mumbai gynaecologist said today, echoing concerns shared by other doctors.<br /> <br /> The Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act of 1971 prohibits abortion after 20 weeks of gestation. But the ministry, in a draft document released last year, has proposed changes to make the duration of pregnancy immaterial when a foetus has substantial anomalies.<br /> <br /> The proposed amendments also suggest termination of pregnancies between 20 and 24 weeks would be allowed only if the woman falls within a set of &quot;categories as may be prescribed by the government&quot;.<br /> <br /> &quot;These clauses are contradictory,&quot; Nikhil Datar, a gynaecologist at Cloudnine Hospital, Mumbai, said in a commentary published today in the British Medical Journal.<br /> <br /> The draft does not define the categories and does not provide a clear solution for women who have substantial foetal abnormalities that may not fall within these categories. Without an unambiguous law, Datar wrote, many women will continue to make ill-informed decisions or risk their lives by seeking illegal terminations through quacks.<br /> <br /> The current 20-week cut-off has long been viewed by sections of doctors as arbitrary and something that compels women to opt for abortions without being absolutely sure that they are taking the right decision.<br /> <br /> Datar recalls how a woman in Mumbai recently opted to abort her foetus after an ultrasound scan suggested what appeared to be a structural abnormality in her foetus at near 20 weeks, instead of waiting for a more reliable and confirmatory test.<br /> <br /> Another woman, a nurse who chose to wait for the result of such a confirmatory test, was forced to seek an illegal abortion conducted about 22 weeks into gestation, a doctor in Mumbai said. Sections of the gynaecological and obstetrics communities have long demanded a change in the abortion law.<br /> <br /> &quot;Some foetal abnormalities like certain cardiac anomalies can be detected only between 20 and 22 weeks,&quot; said Hitesh Bhatt, a Mumbai-based gynaecologist and chairman of the ethics and medico-legal panel of the Federation of the Obstetrics and Gynaecological Societies of India.<br /> <br /> Bhatt said members of the federation had several months ago written to the ministry suggesting that abortions under the law should be clustered into two categories - therapeutic abortions, necessitated when serious foetal abnormalities are detected and non-therapeutic abortions required by other factors such as failure of contraception.<br /> <br /> &quot;For therapeutic abortions, there really should be no time limit, but for other abortions, the 20-week limit is justified,&quot; Bhatt said.<br /> <br /> Some doctors have also suggested a 26-week cut-off for therapeutic abortions. &quot;Most abnormalities should be detected by 26 weeks. We're hoping the health ministry considers this,&quot; said Shymal Sett, a gynaecologist in Calcutta, who is the chairperson of the medical termination of pregnancy panel in the federation of gynaecologists.<br /> <br /> &quot;A procedure beyond 26 weeks wouldn't come under medical termination of pregnancy - it would be an obstetric-driven condition, something that threatens the baby or the mother, a procedure then would be called emergency induction of labour,&quot; Sett said. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 26 June, 2015, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1150626/jsp/nation/story_27922.jsp#.VY0mwfn76KY', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'abortion-law-plan-stirs-concern-4676504', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4676504, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 28452, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Abortion law plan stirs concern', 'metaKeywords' => 'Abortion,Gender Equality,Law and Justice', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Telegraph New Delhi: The health ministry's proposals to amend the abortion law have contradictory clauses that could force women to take unjustified decisions about their foetuses, a Mumbai gynaecologist said today, echoing concerns shared by other doctors. The Medical Termination of...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>The health ministry's proposals to amend the abortion law have contradictory clauses that could force women to take unjustified decisions about their foetuses, a Mumbai gynaecologist said today, echoing concerns shared by other doctors.<br /><br />The Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act of 1971 prohibits abortion after 20 weeks of gestation. But the ministry, in a draft document released last year, has proposed changes to make the duration of pregnancy immaterial when a foetus has substantial anomalies.<br /><br />The proposed amendments also suggest termination of pregnancies between 20 and 24 weeks would be allowed only if the woman falls within a set of &quot;categories as may be prescribed by the government&quot;.<br /><br />&quot;These clauses are contradictory,&quot; Nikhil Datar, a gynaecologist at Cloudnine Hospital, Mumbai, said in a commentary published today in the British Medical Journal.<br /><br />The draft does not define the categories and does not provide a clear solution for women who have substantial foetal abnormalities that may not fall within these categories. Without an unambiguous law, Datar wrote, many women will continue to make ill-informed decisions or risk their lives by seeking illegal terminations through quacks.<br /><br />The current 20-week cut-off has long been viewed by sections of doctors as arbitrary and something that compels women to opt for abortions without being absolutely sure that they are taking the right decision.<br /><br />Datar recalls how a woman in Mumbai recently opted to abort her foetus after an ultrasound scan suggested what appeared to be a structural abnormality in her foetus at near 20 weeks, instead of waiting for a more reliable and confirmatory test.<br /><br />Another woman, a nurse who chose to wait for the result of such a confirmatory test, was forced to seek an illegal abortion conducted about 22 weeks into gestation, a doctor in Mumbai said. Sections of the gynaecological and obstetrics communities have long demanded a change in the abortion law.<br /><br />&quot;Some foetal abnormalities like certain cardiac anomalies can be detected only between 20 and 22 weeks,&quot; said Hitesh Bhatt, a Mumbai-based gynaecologist and chairman of the ethics and medico-legal panel of the Federation of the Obstetrics and Gynaecological Societies of India.<br /><br />Bhatt said members of the federation had several months ago written to the ministry suggesting that abortions under the law should be clustered into two categories - therapeutic abortions, necessitated when serious foetal abnormalities are detected and non-therapeutic abortions required by other factors such as failure of contraception.<br /><br />&quot;For therapeutic abortions, there really should be no time limit, but for other abortions, the 20-week limit is justified,&quot; Bhatt said.<br /><br />Some doctors have also suggested a 26-week cut-off for therapeutic abortions. &quot;Most abnormalities should be detected by 26 weeks. We're hoping the health ministry considers this,&quot; said Shymal Sett, a gynaecologist in Calcutta, who is the chairperson of the medical termination of pregnancy panel in the federation of gynaecologists.<br /><br />&quot;A procedure beyond 26 weeks wouldn't come under medical termination of pregnancy - it would be an obstetric-driven condition, something that threatens the baby or the mother, a procedure then would be called emergency induction of labour,&quot; Sett said.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 28452, 'title' => 'Abortion law plan stirs concern', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Telegraph<br /> <br /> <em>New Delhi: </em>The health ministry's proposals to amend the abortion law have contradictory clauses that could force women to take unjustified decisions about their foetuses, a Mumbai gynaecologist said today, echoing concerns shared by other doctors.<br /> <br /> The Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act of 1971 prohibits abortion after 20 weeks of gestation. But the ministry, in a draft document released last year, has proposed changes to make the duration of pregnancy immaterial when a foetus has substantial anomalies.<br /> <br /> The proposed amendments also suggest termination of pregnancies between 20 and 24 weeks would be allowed only if the woman falls within a set of &quot;categories as may be prescribed by the government&quot;.<br /> <br /> &quot;These clauses are contradictory,&quot; Nikhil Datar, a gynaecologist at Cloudnine Hospital, Mumbai, said in a commentary published today in the British Medical Journal.<br /> <br /> The draft does not define the categories and does not provide a clear solution for women who have substantial foetal abnormalities that may not fall within these categories. Without an unambiguous law, Datar wrote, many women will continue to make ill-informed decisions or risk their lives by seeking illegal terminations through quacks.<br /> <br /> The current 20-week cut-off has long been viewed by sections of doctors as arbitrary and something that compels women to opt for abortions without being absolutely sure that they are taking the right decision.<br /> <br /> Datar recalls how a woman in Mumbai recently opted to abort her foetus after an ultrasound scan suggested what appeared to be a structural abnormality in her foetus at near 20 weeks, instead of waiting for a more reliable and confirmatory test.<br /> <br /> Another woman, a nurse who chose to wait for the result of such a confirmatory test, was forced to seek an illegal abortion conducted about 22 weeks into gestation, a doctor in Mumbai said. Sections of the gynaecological and obstetrics communities have long demanded a change in the abortion law.<br /> <br /> &quot;Some foetal abnormalities like certain cardiac anomalies can be detected only between 20 and 22 weeks,&quot; said Hitesh Bhatt, a Mumbai-based gynaecologist and chairman of the ethics and medico-legal panel of the Federation of the Obstetrics and Gynaecological Societies of India.<br /> <br /> Bhatt said members of the federation had several months ago written to the ministry suggesting that abortions under the law should be clustered into two categories - therapeutic abortions, necessitated when serious foetal abnormalities are detected and non-therapeutic abortions required by other factors such as failure of contraception.<br /> <br /> &quot;For therapeutic abortions, there really should be no time limit, but for other abortions, the 20-week limit is justified,&quot; Bhatt said.<br /> <br /> Some doctors have also suggested a 26-week cut-off for therapeutic abortions. &quot;Most abnormalities should be detected by 26 weeks. We're hoping the health ministry considers this,&quot; said Shymal Sett, a gynaecologist in Calcutta, who is the chairperson of the medical termination of pregnancy panel in the federation of gynaecologists.<br /> <br /> &quot;A procedure beyond 26 weeks wouldn't come under medical termination of pregnancy - it would be an obstetric-driven condition, something that threatens the baby or the mother, a procedure then would be called emergency induction of labour,&quot; Sett said. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 26 June, 2015, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1150626/jsp/nation/story_27922.jsp#.VY0mwfn76KY', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'abortion-law-plan-stirs-concern-4676504', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4676504, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 28452 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Abortion law plan stirs concern' $metaKeywords = 'Abortion,Gender Equality,Law and Justice' $metaDesc = ' -The Telegraph New Delhi: The health ministry's proposals to amend the abortion law have contradictory clauses that could force women to take unjustified decisions about their foetuses, a Mumbai gynaecologist said today, echoing concerns shared by other doctors. The Medical Termination of...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>The health ministry's proposals to amend the abortion law have contradictory clauses that could force women to take unjustified decisions about their foetuses, a Mumbai gynaecologist said today, echoing concerns shared by other doctors.<br /><br />The Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act of 1971 prohibits abortion after 20 weeks of gestation. But the ministry, in a draft document released last year, has proposed changes to make the duration of pregnancy immaterial when a foetus has substantial anomalies.<br /><br />The proposed amendments also suggest termination of pregnancies between 20 and 24 weeks would be allowed only if the woman falls within a set of &quot;categories as may be prescribed by the government&quot;.<br /><br />&quot;These clauses are contradictory,&quot; Nikhil Datar, a gynaecologist at Cloudnine Hospital, Mumbai, said in a commentary published today in the British Medical Journal.<br /><br />The draft does not define the categories and does not provide a clear solution for women who have substantial foetal abnormalities that may not fall within these categories. Without an unambiguous law, Datar wrote, many women will continue to make ill-informed decisions or risk their lives by seeking illegal terminations through quacks.<br /><br />The current 20-week cut-off has long been viewed by sections of doctors as arbitrary and something that compels women to opt for abortions without being absolutely sure that they are taking the right decision.<br /><br />Datar recalls how a woman in Mumbai recently opted to abort her foetus after an ultrasound scan suggested what appeared to be a structural abnormality in her foetus at near 20 weeks, instead of waiting for a more reliable and confirmatory test.<br /><br />Another woman, a nurse who chose to wait for the result of such a confirmatory test, was forced to seek an illegal abortion conducted about 22 weeks into gestation, a doctor in Mumbai said. Sections of the gynaecological and obstetrics communities have long demanded a change in the abortion law.<br /><br />&quot;Some foetal abnormalities like certain cardiac anomalies can be detected only between 20 and 22 weeks,&quot; said Hitesh Bhatt, a Mumbai-based gynaecologist and chairman of the ethics and medico-legal panel of the Federation of the Obstetrics and Gynaecological Societies of India.<br /><br />Bhatt said members of the federation had several months ago written to the ministry suggesting that abortions under the law should be clustered into two categories - therapeutic abortions, necessitated when serious foetal abnormalities are detected and non-therapeutic abortions required by other factors such as failure of contraception.<br /><br />&quot;For therapeutic abortions, there really should be no time limit, but for other abortions, the 20-week limit is justified,&quot; Bhatt said.<br /><br />Some doctors have also suggested a 26-week cut-off for therapeutic abortions. &quot;Most abnormalities should be detected by 26 weeks. We're hoping the health ministry considers this,&quot; said Shymal Sett, a gynaecologist in Calcutta, who is the chairperson of the medical termination of pregnancy panel in the federation of gynaecologists.<br /><br />&quot;A procedure beyond 26 weeks wouldn't come under medical termination of pregnancy - it would be an obstetric-driven condition, something that threatens the baby or the mother, a procedure then would be called emergency induction of labour,&quot; Sett said.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/abortion-law-plan-stirs-concern-4676504.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Abortion law plan stirs concern | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Telegraph New Delhi: The health ministry's proposals to amend the abortion law have contradictory clauses that could force women to take unjustified decisions about their foetuses, a Mumbai gynaecologist said today, echoing concerns shared by other doctors. The Medical Termination of..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Abortion law plan stirs concern</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>The health ministry's proposals to amend the abortion law have contradictory clauses that could force women to take unjustified decisions about their foetuses, a Mumbai gynaecologist said today, echoing concerns shared by other doctors.<br /><br />The Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act of 1971 prohibits abortion after 20 weeks of gestation. But the ministry, in a draft document released last year, has proposed changes to make the duration of pregnancy immaterial when a foetus has substantial anomalies.<br /><br />The proposed amendments also suggest termination of pregnancies between 20 and 24 weeks would be allowed only if the woman falls within a set of "categories as may be prescribed by the government".<br /><br />"These clauses are contradictory," Nikhil Datar, a gynaecologist at Cloudnine Hospital, Mumbai, said in a commentary published today in the British Medical Journal.<br /><br />The draft does not define the categories and does not provide a clear solution for women who have substantial foetal abnormalities that may not fall within these categories. Without an unambiguous law, Datar wrote, many women will continue to make ill-informed decisions or risk their lives by seeking illegal terminations through quacks.<br /><br />The current 20-week cut-off has long been viewed by sections of doctors as arbitrary and something that compels women to opt for abortions without being absolutely sure that they are taking the right decision.<br /><br />Datar recalls how a woman in Mumbai recently opted to abort her foetus after an ultrasound scan suggested what appeared to be a structural abnormality in her foetus at near 20 weeks, instead of waiting for a more reliable and confirmatory test.<br /><br />Another woman, a nurse who chose to wait for the result of such a confirmatory test, was forced to seek an illegal abortion conducted about 22 weeks into gestation, a doctor in Mumbai said. Sections of the gynaecological and obstetrics communities have long demanded a change in the abortion law.<br /><br />"Some foetal abnormalities like certain cardiac anomalies can be detected only between 20 and 22 weeks," said Hitesh Bhatt, a Mumbai-based gynaecologist and chairman of the ethics and medico-legal panel of the Federation of the Obstetrics and Gynaecological Societies of India.<br /><br />Bhatt said members of the federation had several months ago written to the ministry suggesting that abortions under the law should be clustered into two categories - therapeutic abortions, necessitated when serious foetal abnormalities are detected and non-therapeutic abortions required by other factors such as failure of contraception.<br /><br />"For therapeutic abortions, there really should be no time limit, but for other abortions, the 20-week limit is justified," Bhatt said.<br /><br />Some doctors have also suggested a 26-week cut-off for therapeutic abortions. "Most abnormalities should be detected by 26 weeks. We're hoping the health ministry considers this," said Shymal Sett, a gynaecologist in Calcutta, who is the chairperson of the medical termination of pregnancy panel in the federation of gynaecologists.<br /><br />"A procedure beyond 26 weeks wouldn't come under medical termination of pregnancy - it would be an obstetric-driven condition, something that threatens the baby or the mother, a procedure then would be called emergency induction of labour," Sett said.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68056245642b3-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68056245642b3-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68056245642b3-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68056245642b3-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68056245642b3-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68056245642b3-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68056245642b3-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68056245642b3-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68056245642b3-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 28452, 'title' => 'Abortion law plan stirs concern', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Telegraph<br /> <br /> <em>New Delhi: </em>The health ministry's proposals to amend the abortion law have contradictory clauses that could force women to take unjustified decisions about their foetuses, a Mumbai gynaecologist said today, echoing concerns shared by other doctors.<br /> <br /> The Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act of 1971 prohibits abortion after 20 weeks of gestation. But the ministry, in a draft document released last year, has proposed changes to make the duration of pregnancy immaterial when a foetus has substantial anomalies.<br /> <br /> The proposed amendments also suggest termination of pregnancies between 20 and 24 weeks would be allowed only if the woman falls within a set of &quot;categories as may be prescribed by the government&quot;.<br /> <br /> &quot;These clauses are contradictory,&quot; Nikhil Datar, a gynaecologist at Cloudnine Hospital, Mumbai, said in a commentary published today in the British Medical Journal.<br /> <br /> The draft does not define the categories and does not provide a clear solution for women who have substantial foetal abnormalities that may not fall within these categories. Without an unambiguous law, Datar wrote, many women will continue to make ill-informed decisions or risk their lives by seeking illegal terminations through quacks.<br /> <br /> The current 20-week cut-off has long been viewed by sections of doctors as arbitrary and something that compels women to opt for abortions without being absolutely sure that they are taking the right decision.<br /> <br /> Datar recalls how a woman in Mumbai recently opted to abort her foetus after an ultrasound scan suggested what appeared to be a structural abnormality in her foetus at near 20 weeks, instead of waiting for a more reliable and confirmatory test.<br /> <br /> Another woman, a nurse who chose to wait for the result of such a confirmatory test, was forced to seek an illegal abortion conducted about 22 weeks into gestation, a doctor in Mumbai said. Sections of the gynaecological and obstetrics communities have long demanded a change in the abortion law.<br /> <br /> &quot;Some foetal abnormalities like certain cardiac anomalies can be detected only between 20 and 22 weeks,&quot; said Hitesh Bhatt, a Mumbai-based gynaecologist and chairman of the ethics and medico-legal panel of the Federation of the Obstetrics and Gynaecological Societies of India.<br /> <br /> Bhatt said members of the federation had several months ago written to the ministry suggesting that abortions under the law should be clustered into two categories - therapeutic abortions, necessitated when serious foetal abnormalities are detected and non-therapeutic abortions required by other factors such as failure of contraception.<br /> <br /> &quot;For therapeutic abortions, there really should be no time limit, but for other abortions, the 20-week limit is justified,&quot; Bhatt said.<br /> <br /> Some doctors have also suggested a 26-week cut-off for therapeutic abortions. &quot;Most abnormalities should be detected by 26 weeks. We're hoping the health ministry considers this,&quot; said Shymal Sett, a gynaecologist in Calcutta, who is the chairperson of the medical termination of pregnancy panel in the federation of gynaecologists.<br /> <br /> &quot;A procedure beyond 26 weeks wouldn't come under medical termination of pregnancy - it would be an obstetric-driven condition, something that threatens the baby or the mother, a procedure then would be called emergency induction of labour,&quot; Sett said. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 26 June, 2015, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1150626/jsp/nation/story_27922.jsp#.VY0mwfn76KY', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'abortion-law-plan-stirs-concern-4676504', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4676504, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 28452, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Abortion law plan stirs concern', 'metaKeywords' => 'Abortion,Gender Equality,Law and Justice', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Telegraph New Delhi: The health ministry's proposals to amend the abortion law have contradictory clauses that could force women to take unjustified decisions about their foetuses, a Mumbai gynaecologist said today, echoing concerns shared by other doctors. The Medical Termination of...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>The health ministry's proposals to amend the abortion law have contradictory clauses that could force women to take unjustified decisions about their foetuses, a Mumbai gynaecologist said today, echoing concerns shared by other doctors.<br /><br />The Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act of 1971 prohibits abortion after 20 weeks of gestation. But the ministry, in a draft document released last year, has proposed changes to make the duration of pregnancy immaterial when a foetus has substantial anomalies.<br /><br />The proposed amendments also suggest termination of pregnancies between 20 and 24 weeks would be allowed only if the woman falls within a set of &quot;categories as may be prescribed by the government&quot;.<br /><br />&quot;These clauses are contradictory,&quot; Nikhil Datar, a gynaecologist at Cloudnine Hospital, Mumbai, said in a commentary published today in the British Medical Journal.<br /><br />The draft does not define the categories and does not provide a clear solution for women who have substantial foetal abnormalities that may not fall within these categories. Without an unambiguous law, Datar wrote, many women will continue to make ill-informed decisions or risk their lives by seeking illegal terminations through quacks.<br /><br />The current 20-week cut-off has long been viewed by sections of doctors as arbitrary and something that compels women to opt for abortions without being absolutely sure that they are taking the right decision.<br /><br />Datar recalls how a woman in Mumbai recently opted to abort her foetus after an ultrasound scan suggested what appeared to be a structural abnormality in her foetus at near 20 weeks, instead of waiting for a more reliable and confirmatory test.<br /><br />Another woman, a nurse who chose to wait for the result of such a confirmatory test, was forced to seek an illegal abortion conducted about 22 weeks into gestation, a doctor in Mumbai said. Sections of the gynaecological and obstetrics communities have long demanded a change in the abortion law.<br /><br />&quot;Some foetal abnormalities like certain cardiac anomalies can be detected only between 20 and 22 weeks,&quot; said Hitesh Bhatt, a Mumbai-based gynaecologist and chairman of the ethics and medico-legal panel of the Federation of the Obstetrics and Gynaecological Societies of India.<br /><br />Bhatt said members of the federation had several months ago written to the ministry suggesting that abortions under the law should be clustered into two categories - therapeutic abortions, necessitated when serious foetal abnormalities are detected and non-therapeutic abortions required by other factors such as failure of contraception.<br /><br />&quot;For therapeutic abortions, there really should be no time limit, but for other abortions, the 20-week limit is justified,&quot; Bhatt said.<br /><br />Some doctors have also suggested a 26-week cut-off for therapeutic abortions. &quot;Most abnormalities should be detected by 26 weeks. We're hoping the health ministry considers this,&quot; said Shymal Sett, a gynaecologist in Calcutta, who is the chairperson of the medical termination of pregnancy panel in the federation of gynaecologists.<br /><br />&quot;A procedure beyond 26 weeks wouldn't come under medical termination of pregnancy - it would be an obstetric-driven condition, something that threatens the baby or the mother, a procedure then would be called emergency induction of labour,&quot; Sett said.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 28452, 'title' => 'Abortion law plan stirs concern', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Telegraph<br /> <br /> <em>New Delhi: </em>The health ministry's proposals to amend the abortion law have contradictory clauses that could force women to take unjustified decisions about their foetuses, a Mumbai gynaecologist said today, echoing concerns shared by other doctors.<br /> <br /> The Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act of 1971 prohibits abortion after 20 weeks of gestation. But the ministry, in a draft document released last year, has proposed changes to make the duration of pregnancy immaterial when a foetus has substantial anomalies.<br /> <br /> The proposed amendments also suggest termination of pregnancies between 20 and 24 weeks would be allowed only if the woman falls within a set of &quot;categories as may be prescribed by the government&quot;.<br /> <br /> &quot;These clauses are contradictory,&quot; Nikhil Datar, a gynaecologist at Cloudnine Hospital, Mumbai, said in a commentary published today in the British Medical Journal.<br /> <br /> The draft does not define the categories and does not provide a clear solution for women who have substantial foetal abnormalities that may not fall within these categories. Without an unambiguous law, Datar wrote, many women will continue to make ill-informed decisions or risk their lives by seeking illegal terminations through quacks.<br /> <br /> The current 20-week cut-off has long been viewed by sections of doctors as arbitrary and something that compels women to opt for abortions without being absolutely sure that they are taking the right decision.<br /> <br /> Datar recalls how a woman in Mumbai recently opted to abort her foetus after an ultrasound scan suggested what appeared to be a structural abnormality in her foetus at near 20 weeks, instead of waiting for a more reliable and confirmatory test.<br /> <br /> Another woman, a nurse who chose to wait for the result of such a confirmatory test, was forced to seek an illegal abortion conducted about 22 weeks into gestation, a doctor in Mumbai said. Sections of the gynaecological and obstetrics communities have long demanded a change in the abortion law.<br /> <br /> &quot;Some foetal abnormalities like certain cardiac anomalies can be detected only between 20 and 22 weeks,&quot; said Hitesh Bhatt, a Mumbai-based gynaecologist and chairman of the ethics and medico-legal panel of the Federation of the Obstetrics and Gynaecological Societies of India.<br /> <br /> Bhatt said members of the federation had several months ago written to the ministry suggesting that abortions under the law should be clustered into two categories - therapeutic abortions, necessitated when serious foetal abnormalities are detected and non-therapeutic abortions required by other factors such as failure of contraception.<br /> <br /> &quot;For therapeutic abortions, there really should be no time limit, but for other abortions, the 20-week limit is justified,&quot; Bhatt said.<br /> <br /> Some doctors have also suggested a 26-week cut-off for therapeutic abortions. &quot;Most abnormalities should be detected by 26 weeks. We're hoping the health ministry considers this,&quot; said Shymal Sett, a gynaecologist in Calcutta, who is the chairperson of the medical termination of pregnancy panel in the federation of gynaecologists.<br /> <br /> &quot;A procedure beyond 26 weeks wouldn't come under medical termination of pregnancy - it would be an obstetric-driven condition, something that threatens the baby or the mother, a procedure then would be called emergency induction of labour,&quot; Sett said. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 26 June, 2015, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1150626/jsp/nation/story_27922.jsp#.VY0mwfn76KY', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'abortion-law-plan-stirs-concern-4676504', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4676504, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 28452 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Abortion law plan stirs concern' $metaKeywords = 'Abortion,Gender Equality,Law and Justice' $metaDesc = ' -The Telegraph New Delhi: The health ministry's proposals to amend the abortion law have contradictory clauses that could force women to take unjustified decisions about their foetuses, a Mumbai gynaecologist said today, echoing concerns shared by other doctors. The Medical Termination of...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>The health ministry's proposals to amend the abortion law have contradictory clauses that could force women to take unjustified decisions about their foetuses, a Mumbai gynaecologist said today, echoing concerns shared by other doctors.<br /><br />The Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act of 1971 prohibits abortion after 20 weeks of gestation. But the ministry, in a draft document released last year, has proposed changes to make the duration of pregnancy immaterial when a foetus has substantial anomalies.<br /><br />The proposed amendments also suggest termination of pregnancies between 20 and 24 weeks would be allowed only if the woman falls within a set of &quot;categories as may be prescribed by the government&quot;.<br /><br />&quot;These clauses are contradictory,&quot; Nikhil Datar, a gynaecologist at Cloudnine Hospital, Mumbai, said in a commentary published today in the British Medical Journal.<br /><br />The draft does not define the categories and does not provide a clear solution for women who have substantial foetal abnormalities that may not fall within these categories. Without an unambiguous law, Datar wrote, many women will continue to make ill-informed decisions or risk their lives by seeking illegal terminations through quacks.<br /><br />The current 20-week cut-off has long been viewed by sections of doctors as arbitrary and something that compels women to opt for abortions without being absolutely sure that they are taking the right decision.<br /><br />Datar recalls how a woman in Mumbai recently opted to abort her foetus after an ultrasound scan suggested what appeared to be a structural abnormality in her foetus at near 20 weeks, instead of waiting for a more reliable and confirmatory test.<br /><br />Another woman, a nurse who chose to wait for the result of such a confirmatory test, was forced to seek an illegal abortion conducted about 22 weeks into gestation, a doctor in Mumbai said. Sections of the gynaecological and obstetrics communities have long demanded a change in the abortion law.<br /><br />&quot;Some foetal abnormalities like certain cardiac anomalies can be detected only between 20 and 22 weeks,&quot; said Hitesh Bhatt, a Mumbai-based gynaecologist and chairman of the ethics and medico-legal panel of the Federation of the Obstetrics and Gynaecological Societies of India.<br /><br />Bhatt said members of the federation had several months ago written to the ministry suggesting that abortions under the law should be clustered into two categories - therapeutic abortions, necessitated when serious foetal abnormalities are detected and non-therapeutic abortions required by other factors such as failure of contraception.<br /><br />&quot;For therapeutic abortions, there really should be no time limit, but for other abortions, the 20-week limit is justified,&quot; Bhatt said.<br /><br />Some doctors have also suggested a 26-week cut-off for therapeutic abortions. &quot;Most abnormalities should be detected by 26 weeks. We're hoping the health ministry considers this,&quot; said Shymal Sett, a gynaecologist in Calcutta, who is the chairperson of the medical termination of pregnancy panel in the federation of gynaecologists.<br /><br />&quot;A procedure beyond 26 weeks wouldn't come under medical termination of pregnancy - it would be an obstetric-driven condition, something that threatens the baby or the mother, a procedure then would be called emergency induction of labour,&quot; Sett said.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/abortion-law-plan-stirs-concern-4676504.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Abortion law plan stirs concern | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Telegraph New Delhi: The health ministry's proposals to amend the abortion law have contradictory clauses that could force women to take unjustified decisions about their foetuses, a Mumbai gynaecologist said today, echoing concerns shared by other doctors. The Medical Termination of..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Abortion law plan stirs concern</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>The health ministry's proposals to amend the abortion law have contradictory clauses that could force women to take unjustified decisions about their foetuses, a Mumbai gynaecologist said today, echoing concerns shared by other doctors.<br /><br />The Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act of 1971 prohibits abortion after 20 weeks of gestation. But the ministry, in a draft document released last year, has proposed changes to make the duration of pregnancy immaterial when a foetus has substantial anomalies.<br /><br />The proposed amendments also suggest termination of pregnancies between 20 and 24 weeks would be allowed only if the woman falls within a set of "categories as may be prescribed by the government".<br /><br />"These clauses are contradictory," Nikhil Datar, a gynaecologist at Cloudnine Hospital, Mumbai, said in a commentary published today in the British Medical Journal.<br /><br />The draft does not define the categories and does not provide a clear solution for women who have substantial foetal abnormalities that may not fall within these categories. Without an unambiguous law, Datar wrote, many women will continue to make ill-informed decisions or risk their lives by seeking illegal terminations through quacks.<br /><br />The current 20-week cut-off has long been viewed by sections of doctors as arbitrary and something that compels women to opt for abortions without being absolutely sure that they are taking the right decision.<br /><br />Datar recalls how a woman in Mumbai recently opted to abort her foetus after an ultrasound scan suggested what appeared to be a structural abnormality in her foetus at near 20 weeks, instead of waiting for a more reliable and confirmatory test.<br /><br />Another woman, a nurse who chose to wait for the result of such a confirmatory test, was forced to seek an illegal abortion conducted about 22 weeks into gestation, a doctor in Mumbai said. Sections of the gynaecological and obstetrics communities have long demanded a change in the abortion law.<br /><br />"Some foetal abnormalities like certain cardiac anomalies can be detected only between 20 and 22 weeks," said Hitesh Bhatt, a Mumbai-based gynaecologist and chairman of the ethics and medico-legal panel of the Federation of the Obstetrics and Gynaecological Societies of India.<br /><br />Bhatt said members of the federation had several months ago written to the ministry suggesting that abortions under the law should be clustered into two categories - therapeutic abortions, necessitated when serious foetal abnormalities are detected and non-therapeutic abortions required by other factors such as failure of contraception.<br /><br />"For therapeutic abortions, there really should be no time limit, but for other abortions, the 20-week limit is justified," Bhatt said.<br /><br />Some doctors have also suggested a 26-week cut-off for therapeutic abortions. "Most abnormalities should be detected by 26 weeks. We're hoping the health ministry considers this," said Shymal Sett, a gynaecologist in Calcutta, who is the chairperson of the medical termination of pregnancy panel in the federation of gynaecologists.<br /><br />"A procedure beyond 26 weeks wouldn't come under medical termination of pregnancy - it would be an obstetric-driven condition, something that threatens the baby or the mother, a procedure then would be called emergency induction of labour," Sett said.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68056245642b3-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68056245642b3-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68056245642b3-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68056245642b3-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68056245642b3-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68056245642b3-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68056245642b3-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68056245642b3-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68056245642b3-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 28452, 'title' => 'Abortion law plan stirs concern', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Telegraph<br /> <br /> <em>New Delhi: </em>The health ministry's proposals to amend the abortion law have contradictory clauses that could force women to take unjustified decisions about their foetuses, a Mumbai gynaecologist said today, echoing concerns shared by other doctors.<br /> <br /> The Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act of 1971 prohibits abortion after 20 weeks of gestation. But the ministry, in a draft document released last year, has proposed changes to make the duration of pregnancy immaterial when a foetus has substantial anomalies.<br /> <br /> The proposed amendments also suggest termination of pregnancies between 20 and 24 weeks would be allowed only if the woman falls within a set of &quot;categories as may be prescribed by the government&quot;.<br /> <br /> &quot;These clauses are contradictory,&quot; Nikhil Datar, a gynaecologist at Cloudnine Hospital, Mumbai, said in a commentary published today in the British Medical Journal.<br /> <br /> The draft does not define the categories and does not provide a clear solution for women who have substantial foetal abnormalities that may not fall within these categories. Without an unambiguous law, Datar wrote, many women will continue to make ill-informed decisions or risk their lives by seeking illegal terminations through quacks.<br /> <br /> The current 20-week cut-off has long been viewed by sections of doctors as arbitrary and something that compels women to opt for abortions without being absolutely sure that they are taking the right decision.<br /> <br /> Datar recalls how a woman in Mumbai recently opted to abort her foetus after an ultrasound scan suggested what appeared to be a structural abnormality in her foetus at near 20 weeks, instead of waiting for a more reliable and confirmatory test.<br /> <br /> Another woman, a nurse who chose to wait for the result of such a confirmatory test, was forced to seek an illegal abortion conducted about 22 weeks into gestation, a doctor in Mumbai said. Sections of the gynaecological and obstetrics communities have long demanded a change in the abortion law.<br /> <br /> &quot;Some foetal abnormalities like certain cardiac anomalies can be detected only between 20 and 22 weeks,&quot; said Hitesh Bhatt, a Mumbai-based gynaecologist and chairman of the ethics and medico-legal panel of the Federation of the Obstetrics and Gynaecological Societies of India.<br /> <br /> Bhatt said members of the federation had several months ago written to the ministry suggesting that abortions under the law should be clustered into two categories - therapeutic abortions, necessitated when serious foetal abnormalities are detected and non-therapeutic abortions required by other factors such as failure of contraception.<br /> <br /> &quot;For therapeutic abortions, there really should be no time limit, but for other abortions, the 20-week limit is justified,&quot; Bhatt said.<br /> <br /> Some doctors have also suggested a 26-week cut-off for therapeutic abortions. &quot;Most abnormalities should be detected by 26 weeks. We're hoping the health ministry considers this,&quot; said Shymal Sett, a gynaecologist in Calcutta, who is the chairperson of the medical termination of pregnancy panel in the federation of gynaecologists.<br /> <br /> &quot;A procedure beyond 26 weeks wouldn't come under medical termination of pregnancy - it would be an obstetric-driven condition, something that threatens the baby or the mother, a procedure then would be called emergency induction of labour,&quot; Sett said. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 26 June, 2015, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1150626/jsp/nation/story_27922.jsp#.VY0mwfn76KY', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'abortion-law-plan-stirs-concern-4676504', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4676504, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 28452, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Abortion law plan stirs concern', 'metaKeywords' => 'Abortion,Gender Equality,Law and Justice', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Telegraph New Delhi: The health ministry's proposals to amend the abortion law have contradictory clauses that could force women to take unjustified decisions about their foetuses, a Mumbai gynaecologist said today, echoing concerns shared by other doctors. The Medical Termination of...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>The health ministry's proposals to amend the abortion law have contradictory clauses that could force women to take unjustified decisions about their foetuses, a Mumbai gynaecologist said today, echoing concerns shared by other doctors.<br /><br />The Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act of 1971 prohibits abortion after 20 weeks of gestation. But the ministry, in a draft document released last year, has proposed changes to make the duration of pregnancy immaterial when a foetus has substantial anomalies.<br /><br />The proposed amendments also suggest termination of pregnancies between 20 and 24 weeks would be allowed only if the woman falls within a set of &quot;categories as may be prescribed by the government&quot;.<br /><br />&quot;These clauses are contradictory,&quot; Nikhil Datar, a gynaecologist at Cloudnine Hospital, Mumbai, said in a commentary published today in the British Medical Journal.<br /><br />The draft does not define the categories and does not provide a clear solution for women who have substantial foetal abnormalities that may not fall within these categories. Without an unambiguous law, Datar wrote, many women will continue to make ill-informed decisions or risk their lives by seeking illegal terminations through quacks.<br /><br />The current 20-week cut-off has long been viewed by sections of doctors as arbitrary and something that compels women to opt for abortions without being absolutely sure that they are taking the right decision.<br /><br />Datar recalls how a woman in Mumbai recently opted to abort her foetus after an ultrasound scan suggested what appeared to be a structural abnormality in her foetus at near 20 weeks, instead of waiting for a more reliable and confirmatory test.<br /><br />Another woman, a nurse who chose to wait for the result of such a confirmatory test, was forced to seek an illegal abortion conducted about 22 weeks into gestation, a doctor in Mumbai said. Sections of the gynaecological and obstetrics communities have long demanded a change in the abortion law.<br /><br />&quot;Some foetal abnormalities like certain cardiac anomalies can be detected only between 20 and 22 weeks,&quot; said Hitesh Bhatt, a Mumbai-based gynaecologist and chairman of the ethics and medico-legal panel of the Federation of the Obstetrics and Gynaecological Societies of India.<br /><br />Bhatt said members of the federation had several months ago written to the ministry suggesting that abortions under the law should be clustered into two categories - therapeutic abortions, necessitated when serious foetal abnormalities are detected and non-therapeutic abortions required by other factors such as failure of contraception.<br /><br />&quot;For therapeutic abortions, there really should be no time limit, but for other abortions, the 20-week limit is justified,&quot; Bhatt said.<br /><br />Some doctors have also suggested a 26-week cut-off for therapeutic abortions. &quot;Most abnormalities should be detected by 26 weeks. We're hoping the health ministry considers this,&quot; said Shymal Sett, a gynaecologist in Calcutta, who is the chairperson of the medical termination of pregnancy panel in the federation of gynaecologists.<br /><br />&quot;A procedure beyond 26 weeks wouldn't come under medical termination of pregnancy - it would be an obstetric-driven condition, something that threatens the baby or the mother, a procedure then would be called emergency induction of labour,&quot; Sett said.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 28452, 'title' => 'Abortion law plan stirs concern', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Telegraph<br /> <br /> <em>New Delhi: </em>The health ministry's proposals to amend the abortion law have contradictory clauses that could force women to take unjustified decisions about their foetuses, a Mumbai gynaecologist said today, echoing concerns shared by other doctors.<br /> <br /> The Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act of 1971 prohibits abortion after 20 weeks of gestation. But the ministry, in a draft document released last year, has proposed changes to make the duration of pregnancy immaterial when a foetus has substantial anomalies.<br /> <br /> The proposed amendments also suggest termination of pregnancies between 20 and 24 weeks would be allowed only if the woman falls within a set of &quot;categories as may be prescribed by the government&quot;.<br /> <br /> &quot;These clauses are contradictory,&quot; Nikhil Datar, a gynaecologist at Cloudnine Hospital, Mumbai, said in a commentary published today in the British Medical Journal.<br /> <br /> The draft does not define the categories and does not provide a clear solution for women who have substantial foetal abnormalities that may not fall within these categories. Without an unambiguous law, Datar wrote, many women will continue to make ill-informed decisions or risk their lives by seeking illegal terminations through quacks.<br /> <br /> The current 20-week cut-off has long been viewed by sections of doctors as arbitrary and something that compels women to opt for abortions without being absolutely sure that they are taking the right decision.<br /> <br /> Datar recalls how a woman in Mumbai recently opted to abort her foetus after an ultrasound scan suggested what appeared to be a structural abnormality in her foetus at near 20 weeks, instead of waiting for a more reliable and confirmatory test.<br /> <br /> Another woman, a nurse who chose to wait for the result of such a confirmatory test, was forced to seek an illegal abortion conducted about 22 weeks into gestation, a doctor in Mumbai said. Sections of the gynaecological and obstetrics communities have long demanded a change in the abortion law.<br /> <br /> &quot;Some foetal abnormalities like certain cardiac anomalies can be detected only between 20 and 22 weeks,&quot; said Hitesh Bhatt, a Mumbai-based gynaecologist and chairman of the ethics and medico-legal panel of the Federation of the Obstetrics and Gynaecological Societies of India.<br /> <br /> Bhatt said members of the federation had several months ago written to the ministry suggesting that abortions under the law should be clustered into two categories - therapeutic abortions, necessitated when serious foetal abnormalities are detected and non-therapeutic abortions required by other factors such as failure of contraception.<br /> <br /> &quot;For therapeutic abortions, there really should be no time limit, but for other abortions, the 20-week limit is justified,&quot; Bhatt said.<br /> <br /> Some doctors have also suggested a 26-week cut-off for therapeutic abortions. &quot;Most abnormalities should be detected by 26 weeks. We're hoping the health ministry considers this,&quot; said Shymal Sett, a gynaecologist in Calcutta, who is the chairperson of the medical termination of pregnancy panel in the federation of gynaecologists.<br /> <br /> &quot;A procedure beyond 26 weeks wouldn't come under medical termination of pregnancy - it would be an obstetric-driven condition, something that threatens the baby or the mother, a procedure then would be called emergency induction of labour,&quot; Sett said. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 26 June, 2015, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1150626/jsp/nation/story_27922.jsp#.VY0mwfn76KY', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'abortion-law-plan-stirs-concern-4676504', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4676504, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 28452 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Abortion law plan stirs concern' $metaKeywords = 'Abortion,Gender Equality,Law and Justice' $metaDesc = ' -The Telegraph New Delhi: The health ministry's proposals to amend the abortion law have contradictory clauses that could force women to take unjustified decisions about their foetuses, a Mumbai gynaecologist said today, echoing concerns shared by other doctors. The Medical Termination of...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>The health ministry's proposals to amend the abortion law have contradictory clauses that could force women to take unjustified decisions about their foetuses, a Mumbai gynaecologist said today, echoing concerns shared by other doctors.<br /><br />The Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act of 1971 prohibits abortion after 20 weeks of gestation. But the ministry, in a draft document released last year, has proposed changes to make the duration of pregnancy immaterial when a foetus has substantial anomalies.<br /><br />The proposed amendments also suggest termination of pregnancies between 20 and 24 weeks would be allowed only if the woman falls within a set of &quot;categories as may be prescribed by the government&quot;.<br /><br />&quot;These clauses are contradictory,&quot; Nikhil Datar, a gynaecologist at Cloudnine Hospital, Mumbai, said in a commentary published today in the British Medical Journal.<br /><br />The draft does not define the categories and does not provide a clear solution for women who have substantial foetal abnormalities that may not fall within these categories. Without an unambiguous law, Datar wrote, many women will continue to make ill-informed decisions or risk their lives by seeking illegal terminations through quacks.<br /><br />The current 20-week cut-off has long been viewed by sections of doctors as arbitrary and something that compels women to opt for abortions without being absolutely sure that they are taking the right decision.<br /><br />Datar recalls how a woman in Mumbai recently opted to abort her foetus after an ultrasound scan suggested what appeared to be a structural abnormality in her foetus at near 20 weeks, instead of waiting for a more reliable and confirmatory test.<br /><br />Another woman, a nurse who chose to wait for the result of such a confirmatory test, was forced to seek an illegal abortion conducted about 22 weeks into gestation, a doctor in Mumbai said. Sections of the gynaecological and obstetrics communities have long demanded a change in the abortion law.<br /><br />&quot;Some foetal abnormalities like certain cardiac anomalies can be detected only between 20 and 22 weeks,&quot; said Hitesh Bhatt, a Mumbai-based gynaecologist and chairman of the ethics and medico-legal panel of the Federation of the Obstetrics and Gynaecological Societies of India.<br /><br />Bhatt said members of the federation had several months ago written to the ministry suggesting that abortions under the law should be clustered into two categories - therapeutic abortions, necessitated when serious foetal abnormalities are detected and non-therapeutic abortions required by other factors such as failure of contraception.<br /><br />&quot;For therapeutic abortions, there really should be no time limit, but for other abortions, the 20-week limit is justified,&quot; Bhatt said.<br /><br />Some doctors have also suggested a 26-week cut-off for therapeutic abortions. &quot;Most abnormalities should be detected by 26 weeks. We're hoping the health ministry considers this,&quot; said Shymal Sett, a gynaecologist in Calcutta, who is the chairperson of the medical termination of pregnancy panel in the federation of gynaecologists.<br /><br />&quot;A procedure beyond 26 weeks wouldn't come under medical termination of pregnancy - it would be an obstetric-driven condition, something that threatens the baby or the mother, a procedure then would be called emergency induction of labour,&quot; Sett said.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/abortion-law-plan-stirs-concern-4676504.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Abortion law plan stirs concern | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Telegraph New Delhi: The health ministry's proposals to amend the abortion law have contradictory clauses that could force women to take unjustified decisions about their foetuses, a Mumbai gynaecologist said today, echoing concerns shared by other doctors. The Medical Termination of..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Abortion law plan stirs concern</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>The health ministry's proposals to amend the abortion law have contradictory clauses that could force women to take unjustified decisions about their foetuses, a Mumbai gynaecologist said today, echoing concerns shared by other doctors.<br /><br />The Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act of 1971 prohibits abortion after 20 weeks of gestation. But the ministry, in a draft document released last year, has proposed changes to make the duration of pregnancy immaterial when a foetus has substantial anomalies.<br /><br />The proposed amendments also suggest termination of pregnancies between 20 and 24 weeks would be allowed only if the woman falls within a set of "categories as may be prescribed by the government".<br /><br />"These clauses are contradictory," Nikhil Datar, a gynaecologist at Cloudnine Hospital, Mumbai, said in a commentary published today in the British Medical Journal.<br /><br />The draft does not define the categories and does not provide a clear solution for women who have substantial foetal abnormalities that may not fall within these categories. Without an unambiguous law, Datar wrote, many women will continue to make ill-informed decisions or risk their lives by seeking illegal terminations through quacks.<br /><br />The current 20-week cut-off has long been viewed by sections of doctors as arbitrary and something that compels women to opt for abortions without being absolutely sure that they are taking the right decision.<br /><br />Datar recalls how a woman in Mumbai recently opted to abort her foetus after an ultrasound scan suggested what appeared to be a structural abnormality in her foetus at near 20 weeks, instead of waiting for a more reliable and confirmatory test.<br /><br />Another woman, a nurse who chose to wait for the result of such a confirmatory test, was forced to seek an illegal abortion conducted about 22 weeks into gestation, a doctor in Mumbai said. Sections of the gynaecological and obstetrics communities have long demanded a change in the abortion law.<br /><br />"Some foetal abnormalities like certain cardiac anomalies can be detected only between 20 and 22 weeks," said Hitesh Bhatt, a Mumbai-based gynaecologist and chairman of the ethics and medico-legal panel of the Federation of the Obstetrics and Gynaecological Societies of India.<br /><br />Bhatt said members of the federation had several months ago written to the ministry suggesting that abortions under the law should be clustered into two categories - therapeutic abortions, necessitated when serious foetal abnormalities are detected and non-therapeutic abortions required by other factors such as failure of contraception.<br /><br />"For therapeutic abortions, there really should be no time limit, but for other abortions, the 20-week limit is justified," Bhatt said.<br /><br />Some doctors have also suggested a 26-week cut-off for therapeutic abortions. "Most abnormalities should be detected by 26 weeks. We're hoping the health ministry considers this," said Shymal Sett, a gynaecologist in Calcutta, who is the chairperson of the medical termination of pregnancy panel in the federation of gynaecologists.<br /><br />"A procedure beyond 26 weeks wouldn't come under medical termination of pregnancy - it would be an obstetric-driven condition, something that threatens the baby or the mother, a procedure then would be called emergency induction of labour," Sett said.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 28452, 'title' => 'Abortion law plan stirs concern', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Telegraph<br /> <br /> <em>New Delhi: </em>The health ministry's proposals to amend the abortion law have contradictory clauses that could force women to take unjustified decisions about their foetuses, a Mumbai gynaecologist said today, echoing concerns shared by other doctors.<br /> <br /> The Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act of 1971 prohibits abortion after 20 weeks of gestation. But the ministry, in a draft document released last year, has proposed changes to make the duration of pregnancy immaterial when a foetus has substantial anomalies.<br /> <br /> The proposed amendments also suggest termination of pregnancies between 20 and 24 weeks would be allowed only if the woman falls within a set of "categories as may be prescribed by the government".<br /> <br /> "These clauses are contradictory," Nikhil Datar, a gynaecologist at Cloudnine Hospital, Mumbai, said in a commentary published today in the British Medical Journal.<br /> <br /> The draft does not define the categories and does not provide a clear solution for women who have substantial foetal abnormalities that may not fall within these categories. Without an unambiguous law, Datar wrote, many women will continue to make ill-informed decisions or risk their lives by seeking illegal terminations through quacks.<br /> <br /> The current 20-week cut-off has long been viewed by sections of doctors as arbitrary and something that compels women to opt for abortions without being absolutely sure that they are taking the right decision.<br /> <br /> Datar recalls how a woman in Mumbai recently opted to abort her foetus after an ultrasound scan suggested what appeared to be a structural abnormality in her foetus at near 20 weeks, instead of waiting for a more reliable and confirmatory test.<br /> <br /> Another woman, a nurse who chose to wait for the result of such a confirmatory test, was forced to seek an illegal abortion conducted about 22 weeks into gestation, a doctor in Mumbai said. Sections of the gynaecological and obstetrics communities have long demanded a change in the abortion law.<br /> <br /> "Some foetal abnormalities like certain cardiac anomalies can be detected only between 20 and 22 weeks," said Hitesh Bhatt, a Mumbai-based gynaecologist and chairman of the ethics and medico-legal panel of the Federation of the Obstetrics and Gynaecological Societies of India.<br /> <br /> Bhatt said members of the federation had several months ago written to the ministry suggesting that abortions under the law should be clustered into two categories - therapeutic abortions, necessitated when serious foetal abnormalities are detected and non-therapeutic abortions required by other factors such as failure of contraception.<br /> <br /> "For therapeutic abortions, there really should be no time limit, but for other abortions, the 20-week limit is justified," Bhatt said.<br /> <br /> Some doctors have also suggested a 26-week cut-off for therapeutic abortions. "Most abnormalities should be detected by 26 weeks. We're hoping the health ministry considers this," said Shymal Sett, a gynaecologist in Calcutta, who is the chairperson of the medical termination of pregnancy panel in the federation of gynaecologists.<br /> <br /> "A procedure beyond 26 weeks wouldn't come under medical termination of pregnancy - it would be an obstetric-driven condition, something that threatens the baby or the mother, a procedure then would be called emergency induction of labour," Sett said. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 26 June, 2015, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1150626/jsp/nation/story_27922.jsp#.VY0mwfn76KY', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'abortion-law-plan-stirs-concern-4676504', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4676504, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 28452, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Abortion law plan stirs concern', 'metaKeywords' => 'Abortion,Gender Equality,Law and Justice', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Telegraph New Delhi: The health ministry's proposals to amend the abortion law have contradictory clauses that could force women to take unjustified decisions about their foetuses, a Mumbai gynaecologist said today, echoing concerns shared by other doctors. The Medical Termination of...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>The health ministry's proposals to amend the abortion law have contradictory clauses that could force women to take unjustified decisions about their foetuses, a Mumbai gynaecologist said today, echoing concerns shared by other doctors.<br /><br />The Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act of 1971 prohibits abortion after 20 weeks of gestation. But the ministry, in a draft document released last year, has proposed changes to make the duration of pregnancy immaterial when a foetus has substantial anomalies.<br /><br />The proposed amendments also suggest termination of pregnancies between 20 and 24 weeks would be allowed only if the woman falls within a set of "categories as may be prescribed by the government".<br /><br />"These clauses are contradictory," Nikhil Datar, a gynaecologist at Cloudnine Hospital, Mumbai, said in a commentary published today in the British Medical Journal.<br /><br />The draft does not define the categories and does not provide a clear solution for women who have substantial foetal abnormalities that may not fall within these categories. Without an unambiguous law, Datar wrote, many women will continue to make ill-informed decisions or risk their lives by seeking illegal terminations through quacks.<br /><br />The current 20-week cut-off has long been viewed by sections of doctors as arbitrary and something that compels women to opt for abortions without being absolutely sure that they are taking the right decision.<br /><br />Datar recalls how a woman in Mumbai recently opted to abort her foetus after an ultrasound scan suggested what appeared to be a structural abnormality in her foetus at near 20 weeks, instead of waiting for a more reliable and confirmatory test.<br /><br />Another woman, a nurse who chose to wait for the result of such a confirmatory test, was forced to seek an illegal abortion conducted about 22 weeks into gestation, a doctor in Mumbai said. Sections of the gynaecological and obstetrics communities have long demanded a change in the abortion law.<br /><br />"Some foetal abnormalities like certain cardiac anomalies can be detected only between 20 and 22 weeks," said Hitesh Bhatt, a Mumbai-based gynaecologist and chairman of the ethics and medico-legal panel of the Federation of the Obstetrics and Gynaecological Societies of India.<br /><br />Bhatt said members of the federation had several months ago written to the ministry suggesting that abortions under the law should be clustered into two categories - therapeutic abortions, necessitated when serious foetal abnormalities are detected and non-therapeutic abortions required by other factors such as failure of contraception.<br /><br />"For therapeutic abortions, there really should be no time limit, but for other abortions, the 20-week limit is justified," Bhatt said.<br /><br />Some doctors have also suggested a 26-week cut-off for therapeutic abortions. "Most abnormalities should be detected by 26 weeks. We're hoping the health ministry considers this," said Shymal Sett, a gynaecologist in Calcutta, who is the chairperson of the medical termination of pregnancy panel in the federation of gynaecologists.<br /><br />"A procedure beyond 26 weeks wouldn't come under medical termination of pregnancy - it would be an obstetric-driven condition, something that threatens the baby or the mother, a procedure then would be called emergency induction of labour," Sett said.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 28452, 'title' => 'Abortion law plan stirs concern', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Telegraph<br /> <br /> <em>New Delhi: </em>The health ministry's proposals to amend the abortion law have contradictory clauses that could force women to take unjustified decisions about their foetuses, a Mumbai gynaecologist said today, echoing concerns shared by other doctors.<br /> <br /> The Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act of 1971 prohibits abortion after 20 weeks of gestation. But the ministry, in a draft document released last year, has proposed changes to make the duration of pregnancy immaterial when a foetus has substantial anomalies.<br /> <br /> The proposed amendments also suggest termination of pregnancies between 20 and 24 weeks would be allowed only if the woman falls within a set of "categories as may be prescribed by the government".<br /> <br /> "These clauses are contradictory," Nikhil Datar, a gynaecologist at Cloudnine Hospital, Mumbai, said in a commentary published today in the British Medical Journal.<br /> <br /> The draft does not define the categories and does not provide a clear solution for women who have substantial foetal abnormalities that may not fall within these categories. Without an unambiguous law, Datar wrote, many women will continue to make ill-informed decisions or risk their lives by seeking illegal terminations through quacks.<br /> <br /> The current 20-week cut-off has long been viewed by sections of doctors as arbitrary and something that compels women to opt for abortions without being absolutely sure that they are taking the right decision.<br /> <br /> Datar recalls how a woman in Mumbai recently opted to abort her foetus after an ultrasound scan suggested what appeared to be a structural abnormality in her foetus at near 20 weeks, instead of waiting for a more reliable and confirmatory test.<br /> <br /> Another woman, a nurse who chose to wait for the result of such a confirmatory test, was forced to seek an illegal abortion conducted about 22 weeks into gestation, a doctor in Mumbai said. Sections of the gynaecological and obstetrics communities have long demanded a change in the abortion law.<br /> <br /> "Some foetal abnormalities like certain cardiac anomalies can be detected only between 20 and 22 weeks," said Hitesh Bhatt, a Mumbai-based gynaecologist and chairman of the ethics and medico-legal panel of the Federation of the Obstetrics and Gynaecological Societies of India.<br /> <br /> Bhatt said members of the federation had several months ago written to the ministry suggesting that abortions under the law should be clustered into two categories - therapeutic abortions, necessitated when serious foetal abnormalities are detected and non-therapeutic abortions required by other factors such as failure of contraception.<br /> <br /> "For therapeutic abortions, there really should be no time limit, but for other abortions, the 20-week limit is justified," Bhatt said.<br /> <br /> Some doctors have also suggested a 26-week cut-off for therapeutic abortions. "Most abnormalities should be detected by 26 weeks. We're hoping the health ministry considers this," said Shymal Sett, a gynaecologist in Calcutta, who is the chairperson of the medical termination of pregnancy panel in the federation of gynaecologists.<br /> <br /> "A procedure beyond 26 weeks wouldn't come under medical termination of pregnancy - it would be an obstetric-driven condition, something that threatens the baby or the mother, a procedure then would be called emergency induction of labour," Sett said. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 26 June, 2015, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1150626/jsp/nation/story_27922.jsp#.VY0mwfn76KY', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'abortion-law-plan-stirs-concern-4676504', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4676504, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 28452 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Abortion law plan stirs concern' $metaKeywords = 'Abortion,Gender Equality,Law and Justice' $metaDesc = ' -The Telegraph New Delhi: The health ministry's proposals to amend the abortion law have contradictory clauses that could force women to take unjustified decisions about their foetuses, a Mumbai gynaecologist said today, echoing concerns shared by other doctors. The Medical Termination of...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>The health ministry's proposals to amend the abortion law have contradictory clauses that could force women to take unjustified decisions about their foetuses, a Mumbai gynaecologist said today, echoing concerns shared by other doctors.<br /><br />The Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act of 1971 prohibits abortion after 20 weeks of gestation. But the ministry, in a draft document released last year, has proposed changes to make the duration of pregnancy immaterial when a foetus has substantial anomalies.<br /><br />The proposed amendments also suggest termination of pregnancies between 20 and 24 weeks would be allowed only if the woman falls within a set of "categories as may be prescribed by the government".<br /><br />"These clauses are contradictory," Nikhil Datar, a gynaecologist at Cloudnine Hospital, Mumbai, said in a commentary published today in the British Medical Journal.<br /><br />The draft does not define the categories and does not provide a clear solution for women who have substantial foetal abnormalities that may not fall within these categories. Without an unambiguous law, Datar wrote, many women will continue to make ill-informed decisions or risk their lives by seeking illegal terminations through quacks.<br /><br />The current 20-week cut-off has long been viewed by sections of doctors as arbitrary and something that compels women to opt for abortions without being absolutely sure that they are taking the right decision.<br /><br />Datar recalls how a woman in Mumbai recently opted to abort her foetus after an ultrasound scan suggested what appeared to be a structural abnormality in her foetus at near 20 weeks, instead of waiting for a more reliable and confirmatory test.<br /><br />Another woman, a nurse who chose to wait for the result of such a confirmatory test, was forced to seek an illegal abortion conducted about 22 weeks into gestation, a doctor in Mumbai said. Sections of the gynaecological and obstetrics communities have long demanded a change in the abortion law.<br /><br />"Some foetal abnormalities like certain cardiac anomalies can be detected only between 20 and 22 weeks," said Hitesh Bhatt, a Mumbai-based gynaecologist and chairman of the ethics and medico-legal panel of the Federation of the Obstetrics and Gynaecological Societies of India.<br /><br />Bhatt said members of the federation had several months ago written to the ministry suggesting that abortions under the law should be clustered into two categories - therapeutic abortions, necessitated when serious foetal abnormalities are detected and non-therapeutic abortions required by other factors such as failure of contraception.<br /><br />"For therapeutic abortions, there really should be no time limit, but for other abortions, the 20-week limit is justified," Bhatt said.<br /><br />Some doctors have also suggested a 26-week cut-off for therapeutic abortions. "Most abnormalities should be detected by 26 weeks. We're hoping the health ministry considers this," said Shymal Sett, a gynaecologist in Calcutta, who is the chairperson of the medical termination of pregnancy panel in the federation of gynaecologists.<br /><br />"A procedure beyond 26 weeks wouldn't come under medical termination of pregnancy - it would be an obstetric-driven condition, something that threatens the baby or the mother, a procedure then would be called emergency induction of labour," Sett said.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Abortion law plan stirs concern |
-The Telegraph
New Delhi: The health ministry's proposals to amend the abortion law have contradictory clauses that could force women to take unjustified decisions about their foetuses, a Mumbai gynaecologist said today, echoing concerns shared by other doctors. The Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act of 1971 prohibits abortion after 20 weeks of gestation. But the ministry, in a draft document released last year, has proposed changes to make the duration of pregnancy immaterial when a foetus has substantial anomalies. The proposed amendments also suggest termination of pregnancies between 20 and 24 weeks would be allowed only if the woman falls within a set of "categories as may be prescribed by the government". "These clauses are contradictory," Nikhil Datar, a gynaecologist at Cloudnine Hospital, Mumbai, said in a commentary published today in the British Medical Journal. The draft does not define the categories and does not provide a clear solution for women who have substantial foetal abnormalities that may not fall within these categories. Without an unambiguous law, Datar wrote, many women will continue to make ill-informed decisions or risk their lives by seeking illegal terminations through quacks. The current 20-week cut-off has long been viewed by sections of doctors as arbitrary and something that compels women to opt for abortions without being absolutely sure that they are taking the right decision. Datar recalls how a woman in Mumbai recently opted to abort her foetus after an ultrasound scan suggested what appeared to be a structural abnormality in her foetus at near 20 weeks, instead of waiting for a more reliable and confirmatory test. Another woman, a nurse who chose to wait for the result of such a confirmatory test, was forced to seek an illegal abortion conducted about 22 weeks into gestation, a doctor in Mumbai said. Sections of the gynaecological and obstetrics communities have long demanded a change in the abortion law. "Some foetal abnormalities like certain cardiac anomalies can be detected only between 20 and 22 weeks," said Hitesh Bhatt, a Mumbai-based gynaecologist and chairman of the ethics and medico-legal panel of the Federation of the Obstetrics and Gynaecological Societies of India. Bhatt said members of the federation had several months ago written to the ministry suggesting that abortions under the law should be clustered into two categories - therapeutic abortions, necessitated when serious foetal abnormalities are detected and non-therapeutic abortions required by other factors such as failure of contraception. "For therapeutic abortions, there really should be no time limit, but for other abortions, the 20-week limit is justified," Bhatt said. Some doctors have also suggested a 26-week cut-off for therapeutic abortions. "Most abnormalities should be detected by 26 weeks. We're hoping the health ministry considers this," said Shymal Sett, a gynaecologist in Calcutta, who is the chairperson of the medical termination of pregnancy panel in the federation of gynaecologists. "A procedure beyond 26 weeks wouldn't come under medical termination of pregnancy - it would be an obstetric-driven condition, something that threatens the baby or the mother, a procedure then would be called emergency induction of labour," Sett said. |