Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/absurd-arguments-madhu-purnima-kishwar-17446/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/absurd-arguments-madhu-purnima-kishwar-17446/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/absurd-arguments-madhu-purnima-kishwar-17446/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/absurd-arguments-madhu-purnima-kishwar-17446/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681e4c7875396-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681e4c7875396-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr681e4c7875396-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681e4c7875396-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681e4c7875396-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681e4c7875396-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681e4c7875396-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr681e4c7875396-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr681e4c7875396-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 17318, 'title' => 'Absurd Arguments -Madhu Purnima Kishwar', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -Outlook </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>While some question my motives in seeking information on Rahul Gandhi's foreign trips, others say that parting with such information will jeopardize his security. Really?&nbsp;</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> I am really puzzled by some of the responses to my RTI regarding Rahul Gandhi&rsquo;s foreign trips. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> One set of persons have echoed the arguments used by Congress spokespersons Manish Tiwari and Jayanti Natarajan questioning my motives for demanding information that &ldquo;violates the privacy of Rahul Gandhi.&rdquo; A related argument is that parting with such information will jeopardize Rahul Gandhi&rsquo;s security. Both arguments sound absurd to me.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> As far as violating his privacy is concerned: </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; Rahul Gandhi is not a private citizen. He is an elected Member of Parliament answerable to citizens. Unlike ministers, MPs may not require prior government permission to go abroad. But I am told the established protocol is that MPs have to inform the Speaker when going abroad, especially if the House is in session. I intend to file an RTI with the Speaker of Lok Sabha to find if MPs in general, and Rahul Gandhi in particular, are observing this protocol. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; I have merely asked whether these were official trips or not. If some or all of these were official trips then citizens have a right to know about them. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; Gandhi is neither a secret service agent, nor a RAW or Intelligence Bureau official. Therefore, his foreign trips could not possibly be James bond style secret missions. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; Rahul Gandhi is a prime ministerial aspirant and the most influential person in the Congress Party after his mother Sonia Gandhi. He is known to influence government policy. Therefore, citizens have a right to put his public dealings to scrutiny. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; If some or all of these trips were private, merely disclosing which country he went to does not by any stretch of imagination infringe his privacy, unless he was doing something hanky-panky while abroad. Congress Party should avoid giving that impression by being so paranoid about his trips abroad. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; I have not sought to know who he spends his leisure hours or holidays with. I have merely asked whether he went on official business and what was the nature of the official business, if any. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The argument that it may jeopardize Rahul&rsquo;s security is absurd for the following reasons: </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; I have asked about his past trips, not those he plans to undertake in the future. He cannot be harmed by those he fears with retrospective effect. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; Information about prime ministerial, presidential trips is public knowledge unless they undertake some secret mission for the country. If their security is not compromised, how come information about Rahul Gandhi&rsquo;s trips needs to be protected more diligently than information regarding the trips undertaken by &nbsp;the Prime Minister of India or the President of the United States of America? </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The second set of responses has come from those who agree with my questions. But I find it strange that many of them have congratulated me for my &ldquo;brave&rdquo; act. Some have even expressed concern for my safety as though I have done something politically dangerous. This has surprised me more than the first set of hostile responses. I fail to understand, what is so brave about asking for such simple information? After all, I am not chasing information about some mafia don! </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> I wish Congressmen and women who have declared war on citizens demanding simple information about the affairs of their party president and her family would realize they are doing more harm than good. A party which prides itself on ushering in the Right to Information Act ought not to be so paranoid about the doings of its first family. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Or would they rather bring in a constitutional amendment saying the First Family of the Congress Party is exempt from all laws of the land? </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This would be in tune with the act of listing one and only person&mdash;namely Robert Vadra by name&mdash;as someone exempt from security check at airports while all others, such as the Prime Minister, Home Minister, Chief Justice of India etc. are exempt only on account of the high constitutional office they hold, not because they belong to some higher species. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Outlook, 8 October, 2012, http://www.outlookindia.com/article.aspx?282510', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'absurd-arguments-madhu-purnima-kishwar-17446', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17446, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 17318, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Absurd Arguments -Madhu Purnima Kishwar', 'metaKeywords' => 'Right to Information,rti', 'metaDesc' => ' -Outlook While some question my motives in seeking information on Rahul Gandhi's foreign trips, others say that parting with such information will jeopardize his security. Really?&nbsp; I am really puzzled by some of the responses to my RTI regarding Rahul Gandhi&rsquo;s foreign...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-Outlook</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>While some question my motives in seeking information on Rahul Gandhi's foreign trips, others say that parting with such information will jeopardize his security. Really?&nbsp;</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">I am really puzzled by some of the responses to my RTI regarding Rahul Gandhi&rsquo;s foreign trips.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">One set of persons have echoed the arguments used by Congress spokespersons Manish Tiwari and Jayanti Natarajan questioning my motives for demanding information that &ldquo;violates the privacy of Rahul Gandhi.&rdquo; A related argument is that parting with such information will jeopardize Rahul Gandhi&rsquo;s security. Both arguments sound absurd to me.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">As far as violating his privacy is concerned:</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; Rahul Gandhi is not a private citizen. He is an elected Member of Parliament answerable to citizens. Unlike ministers, MPs may not require prior government permission to go abroad. But I am told the established protocol is that MPs have to inform the Speaker when going abroad, especially if the House is in session. I intend to file an RTI with the Speaker of Lok Sabha to find if MPs in general, and Rahul Gandhi in particular, are observing this protocol.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; I have merely asked whether these were official trips or not. If some or all of these were official trips then citizens have a right to know about them.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; Gandhi is neither a secret service agent, nor a RAW or Intelligence Bureau official. Therefore, his foreign trips could not possibly be James bond style secret missions.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; Rahul Gandhi is a prime ministerial aspirant and the most influential person in the Congress Party after his mother Sonia Gandhi. He is known to influence government policy. Therefore, citizens have a right to put his public dealings to scrutiny.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; If some or all of these trips were private, merely disclosing which country he went to does not by any stretch of imagination infringe his privacy, unless he was doing something hanky-panky while abroad. Congress Party should avoid giving that impression by being so paranoid about his trips abroad.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; I have not sought to know who he spends his leisure hours or holidays with. I have merely asked whether he went on official business and what was the nature of the official business, if any. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The argument that it may jeopardize Rahul&rsquo;s security is absurd for the following reasons:</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; I have asked about his past trips, not those he plans to undertake in the future. He cannot be harmed by those he fears with retrospective effect.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; Information about prime ministerial, presidential trips is public knowledge unless they undertake some secret mission for the country. If their security is not compromised, how come information about Rahul Gandhi&rsquo;s trips needs to be protected more diligently than information regarding the trips undertaken by &nbsp;the Prime Minister of India or the President of the United States of America?</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The second set of responses has come from those who agree with my questions. But I find it strange that many of them have congratulated me for my &ldquo;brave&rdquo; act. Some have even expressed concern for my safety as though I have done something politically dangerous. This has surprised me more than the first set of hostile responses. I fail to understand, what is so brave about asking for such simple information? After all, I am not chasing information about some mafia don!</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">I wish Congressmen and women who have declared war on citizens demanding simple information about the affairs of their party president and her family would realize they are doing more harm than good. A party which prides itself on ushering in the Right to Information Act ought not to be so paranoid about the doings of its first family.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Or would they rather bring in a constitutional amendment saying the First Family of the Congress Party is exempt from all laws of the land?</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This would be in tune with the act of listing one and only person&mdash;namely Robert Vadra by name&mdash;as someone exempt from security check at airports while all others, such as the Prime Minister, Home Minister, Chief Justice of India etc. are exempt only on account of the high constitutional office they hold, not because they belong to some higher species.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 17318, 'title' => 'Absurd Arguments -Madhu Purnima Kishwar', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -Outlook </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>While some question my motives in seeking information on Rahul Gandhi's foreign trips, others say that parting with such information will jeopardize his security. Really?&nbsp;</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> I am really puzzled by some of the responses to my RTI regarding Rahul Gandhi&rsquo;s foreign trips. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> One set of persons have echoed the arguments used by Congress spokespersons Manish Tiwari and Jayanti Natarajan questioning my motives for demanding information that &ldquo;violates the privacy of Rahul Gandhi.&rdquo; A related argument is that parting with such information will jeopardize Rahul Gandhi&rsquo;s security. Both arguments sound absurd to me.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> As far as violating his privacy is concerned: </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; Rahul Gandhi is not a private citizen. He is an elected Member of Parliament answerable to citizens. Unlike ministers, MPs may not require prior government permission to go abroad. But I am told the established protocol is that MPs have to inform the Speaker when going abroad, especially if the House is in session. I intend to file an RTI with the Speaker of Lok Sabha to find if MPs in general, and Rahul Gandhi in particular, are observing this protocol. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; I have merely asked whether these were official trips or not. If some or all of these were official trips then citizens have a right to know about them. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; Gandhi is neither a secret service agent, nor a RAW or Intelligence Bureau official. Therefore, his foreign trips could not possibly be James bond style secret missions. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; Rahul Gandhi is a prime ministerial aspirant and the most influential person in the Congress Party after his mother Sonia Gandhi. He is known to influence government policy. Therefore, citizens have a right to put his public dealings to scrutiny. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; If some or all of these trips were private, merely disclosing which country he went to does not by any stretch of imagination infringe his privacy, unless he was doing something hanky-panky while abroad. Congress Party should avoid giving that impression by being so paranoid about his trips abroad. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; I have not sought to know who he spends his leisure hours or holidays with. I have merely asked whether he went on official business and what was the nature of the official business, if any. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The argument that it may jeopardize Rahul&rsquo;s security is absurd for the following reasons: </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; I have asked about his past trips, not those he plans to undertake in the future. He cannot be harmed by those he fears with retrospective effect. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; Information about prime ministerial, presidential trips is public knowledge unless they undertake some secret mission for the country. If their security is not compromised, how come information about Rahul Gandhi&rsquo;s trips needs to be protected more diligently than information regarding the trips undertaken by &nbsp;the Prime Minister of India or the President of the United States of America? </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The second set of responses has come from those who agree with my questions. But I find it strange that many of them have congratulated me for my &ldquo;brave&rdquo; act. Some have even expressed concern for my safety as though I have done something politically dangerous. This has surprised me more than the first set of hostile responses. I fail to understand, what is so brave about asking for such simple information? After all, I am not chasing information about some mafia don! </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> I wish Congressmen and women who have declared war on citizens demanding simple information about the affairs of their party president and her family would realize they are doing more harm than good. A party which prides itself on ushering in the Right to Information Act ought not to be so paranoid about the doings of its first family. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Or would they rather bring in a constitutional amendment saying the First Family of the Congress Party is exempt from all laws of the land? </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This would be in tune with the act of listing one and only person&mdash;namely Robert Vadra by name&mdash;as someone exempt from security check at airports while all others, such as the Prime Minister, Home Minister, Chief Justice of India etc. are exempt only on account of the high constitutional office they hold, not because they belong to some higher species. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Outlook, 8 October, 2012, http://www.outlookindia.com/article.aspx?282510', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'absurd-arguments-madhu-purnima-kishwar-17446', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17446, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 17318 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Absurd Arguments -Madhu Purnima Kishwar' $metaKeywords = 'Right to Information,rti' $metaDesc = ' -Outlook While some question my motives in seeking information on Rahul Gandhi's foreign trips, others say that parting with such information will jeopardize his security. Really?&nbsp; I am really puzzled by some of the responses to my RTI regarding Rahul Gandhi&rsquo;s foreign...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-Outlook</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>While some question my motives in seeking information on Rahul Gandhi's foreign trips, others say that parting with such information will jeopardize his security. Really?&nbsp;</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">I am really puzzled by some of the responses to my RTI regarding Rahul Gandhi&rsquo;s foreign trips.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">One set of persons have echoed the arguments used by Congress spokespersons Manish Tiwari and Jayanti Natarajan questioning my motives for demanding information that &ldquo;violates the privacy of Rahul Gandhi.&rdquo; A related argument is that parting with such information will jeopardize Rahul Gandhi&rsquo;s security. Both arguments sound absurd to me.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">As far as violating his privacy is concerned:</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; Rahul Gandhi is not a private citizen. He is an elected Member of Parliament answerable to citizens. Unlike ministers, MPs may not require prior government permission to go abroad. But I am told the established protocol is that MPs have to inform the Speaker when going abroad, especially if the House is in session. I intend to file an RTI with the Speaker of Lok Sabha to find if MPs in general, and Rahul Gandhi in particular, are observing this protocol.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; I have merely asked whether these were official trips or not. If some or all of these were official trips then citizens have a right to know about them.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; Gandhi is neither a secret service agent, nor a RAW or Intelligence Bureau official. Therefore, his foreign trips could not possibly be James bond style secret missions.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; Rahul Gandhi is a prime ministerial aspirant and the most influential person in the Congress Party after his mother Sonia Gandhi. He is known to influence government policy. Therefore, citizens have a right to put his public dealings to scrutiny.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; If some or all of these trips were private, merely disclosing which country he went to does not by any stretch of imagination infringe his privacy, unless he was doing something hanky-panky while abroad. Congress Party should avoid giving that impression by being so paranoid about his trips abroad.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; I have not sought to know who he spends his leisure hours or holidays with. I have merely asked whether he went on official business and what was the nature of the official business, if any. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The argument that it may jeopardize Rahul&rsquo;s security is absurd for the following reasons:</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; I have asked about his past trips, not those he plans to undertake in the future. He cannot be harmed by those he fears with retrospective effect.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; Information about prime ministerial, presidential trips is public knowledge unless they undertake some secret mission for the country. If their security is not compromised, how come information about Rahul Gandhi&rsquo;s trips needs to be protected more diligently than information regarding the trips undertaken by &nbsp;the Prime Minister of India or the President of the United States of America?</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The second set of responses has come from those who agree with my questions. But I find it strange that many of them have congratulated me for my &ldquo;brave&rdquo; act. Some have even expressed concern for my safety as though I have done something politically dangerous. This has surprised me more than the first set of hostile responses. I fail to understand, what is so brave about asking for such simple information? After all, I am not chasing information about some mafia don!</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">I wish Congressmen and women who have declared war on citizens demanding simple information about the affairs of their party president and her family would realize they are doing more harm than good. A party which prides itself on ushering in the Right to Information Act ought not to be so paranoid about the doings of its first family.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Or would they rather bring in a constitutional amendment saying the First Family of the Congress Party is exempt from all laws of the land?</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This would be in tune with the act of listing one and only person&mdash;namely Robert Vadra by name&mdash;as someone exempt from security check at airports while all others, such as the Prime Minister, Home Minister, Chief Justice of India etc. are exempt only on account of the high constitutional office they hold, not because they belong to some higher species.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/absurd-arguments-madhu-purnima-kishwar-17446.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Absurd Arguments -Madhu Purnima Kishwar | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -Outlook While some question my motives in seeking information on Rahul Gandhi's foreign trips, others say that parting with such information will jeopardize his security. Really? I am really puzzled by some of the responses to my RTI regarding Rahul Gandhi’s foreign..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Absurd Arguments -Madhu Purnima Kishwar</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-Outlook</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>While some question my motives in seeking information on Rahul Gandhi's foreign trips, others say that parting with such information will jeopardize his security. Really? </em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">I am really puzzled by some of the responses to my RTI regarding Rahul Gandhi’s foreign trips.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">One set of persons have echoed the arguments used by Congress spokespersons Manish Tiwari and Jayanti Natarajan questioning my motives for demanding information that “violates the privacy of Rahul Gandhi.” A related argument is that parting with such information will jeopardize Rahul Gandhi’s security. Both arguments sound absurd to me. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">As far as violating his privacy is concerned:</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"> Rahul Gandhi is not a private citizen. He is an elected Member of Parliament answerable to citizens. Unlike ministers, MPs may not require prior government permission to go abroad. But I am told the established protocol is that MPs have to inform the Speaker when going abroad, especially if the House is in session. I intend to file an RTI with the Speaker of Lok Sabha to find if MPs in general, and Rahul Gandhi in particular, are observing this protocol.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify"> I have merely asked whether these were official trips or not. If some or all of these were official trips then citizens have a right to know about them.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify"> Gandhi is neither a secret service agent, nor a RAW or Intelligence Bureau official. Therefore, his foreign trips could not possibly be James bond style secret missions.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify"> Rahul Gandhi is a prime ministerial aspirant and the most influential person in the Congress Party after his mother Sonia Gandhi. He is known to influence government policy. Therefore, citizens have a right to put his public dealings to scrutiny.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify"> If some or all of these trips were private, merely disclosing which country he went to does not by any stretch of imagination infringe his privacy, unless he was doing something hanky-panky while abroad. Congress Party should avoid giving that impression by being so paranoid about his trips abroad.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify"> I have not sought to know who he spends his leisure hours or holidays with. I have merely asked whether he went on official business and what was the nature of the official business, if any. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The argument that it may jeopardize Rahul’s security is absurd for the following reasons:</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"> I have asked about his past trips, not those he plans to undertake in the future. He cannot be harmed by those he fears with retrospective effect.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify"> Information about prime ministerial, presidential trips is public knowledge unless they undertake some secret mission for the country. If their security is not compromised, how come information about Rahul Gandhi’s trips needs to be protected more diligently than information regarding the trips undertaken by the Prime Minister of India or the President of the United States of America?</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The second set of responses has come from those who agree with my questions. But I find it strange that many of them have congratulated me for my “brave” act. Some have even expressed concern for my safety as though I have done something politically dangerous. This has surprised me more than the first set of hostile responses. I fail to understand, what is so brave about asking for such simple information? After all, I am not chasing information about some mafia don!</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">I wish Congressmen and women who have declared war on citizens demanding simple information about the affairs of their party president and her family would realize they are doing more harm than good. A party which prides itself on ushering in the Right to Information Act ought not to be so paranoid about the doings of its first family.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Or would they rather bring in a constitutional amendment saying the First Family of the Congress Party is exempt from all laws of the land?</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This would be in tune with the act of listing one and only person—namely Robert Vadra by name—as someone exempt from security check at airports while all others, such as the Prime Minister, Home Minister, Chief Justice of India etc. are exempt only on account of the high constitutional office they hold, not because they belong to some higher species.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681e4c7875396-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681e4c7875396-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr681e4c7875396-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681e4c7875396-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681e4c7875396-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681e4c7875396-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681e4c7875396-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr681e4c7875396-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr681e4c7875396-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 17318, 'title' => 'Absurd Arguments -Madhu Purnima Kishwar', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -Outlook </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>While some question my motives in seeking information on Rahul Gandhi's foreign trips, others say that parting with such information will jeopardize his security. Really?&nbsp;</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> I am really puzzled by some of the responses to my RTI regarding Rahul Gandhi&rsquo;s foreign trips. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> One set of persons have echoed the arguments used by Congress spokespersons Manish Tiwari and Jayanti Natarajan questioning my motives for demanding information that &ldquo;violates the privacy of Rahul Gandhi.&rdquo; A related argument is that parting with such information will jeopardize Rahul Gandhi&rsquo;s security. Both arguments sound absurd to me.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> As far as violating his privacy is concerned: </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; Rahul Gandhi is not a private citizen. He is an elected Member of Parliament answerable to citizens. Unlike ministers, MPs may not require prior government permission to go abroad. But I am told the established protocol is that MPs have to inform the Speaker when going abroad, especially if the House is in session. I intend to file an RTI with the Speaker of Lok Sabha to find if MPs in general, and Rahul Gandhi in particular, are observing this protocol. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; I have merely asked whether these were official trips or not. If some or all of these were official trips then citizens have a right to know about them. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; Gandhi is neither a secret service agent, nor a RAW or Intelligence Bureau official. Therefore, his foreign trips could not possibly be James bond style secret missions. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; Rahul Gandhi is a prime ministerial aspirant and the most influential person in the Congress Party after his mother Sonia Gandhi. He is known to influence government policy. Therefore, citizens have a right to put his public dealings to scrutiny. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; If some or all of these trips were private, merely disclosing which country he went to does not by any stretch of imagination infringe his privacy, unless he was doing something hanky-panky while abroad. Congress Party should avoid giving that impression by being so paranoid about his trips abroad. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; I have not sought to know who he spends his leisure hours or holidays with. I have merely asked whether he went on official business and what was the nature of the official business, if any. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The argument that it may jeopardize Rahul&rsquo;s security is absurd for the following reasons: </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; I have asked about his past trips, not those he plans to undertake in the future. He cannot be harmed by those he fears with retrospective effect. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; Information about prime ministerial, presidential trips is public knowledge unless they undertake some secret mission for the country. If their security is not compromised, how come information about Rahul Gandhi&rsquo;s trips needs to be protected more diligently than information regarding the trips undertaken by &nbsp;the Prime Minister of India or the President of the United States of America? </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The second set of responses has come from those who agree with my questions. But I find it strange that many of them have congratulated me for my &ldquo;brave&rdquo; act. Some have even expressed concern for my safety as though I have done something politically dangerous. This has surprised me more than the first set of hostile responses. I fail to understand, what is so brave about asking for such simple information? After all, I am not chasing information about some mafia don! </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> I wish Congressmen and women who have declared war on citizens demanding simple information about the affairs of their party president and her family would realize they are doing more harm than good. A party which prides itself on ushering in the Right to Information Act ought not to be so paranoid about the doings of its first family. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Or would they rather bring in a constitutional amendment saying the First Family of the Congress Party is exempt from all laws of the land? </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This would be in tune with the act of listing one and only person&mdash;namely Robert Vadra by name&mdash;as someone exempt from security check at airports while all others, such as the Prime Minister, Home Minister, Chief Justice of India etc. are exempt only on account of the high constitutional office they hold, not because they belong to some higher species. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Outlook, 8 October, 2012, http://www.outlookindia.com/article.aspx?282510', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'absurd-arguments-madhu-purnima-kishwar-17446', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17446, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 17318, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Absurd Arguments -Madhu Purnima Kishwar', 'metaKeywords' => 'Right to Information,rti', 'metaDesc' => ' -Outlook While some question my motives in seeking information on Rahul Gandhi's foreign trips, others say that parting with such information will jeopardize his security. Really?&nbsp; I am really puzzled by some of the responses to my RTI regarding Rahul Gandhi&rsquo;s foreign...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-Outlook</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>While some question my motives in seeking information on Rahul Gandhi's foreign trips, others say that parting with such information will jeopardize his security. Really?&nbsp;</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">I am really puzzled by some of the responses to my RTI regarding Rahul Gandhi&rsquo;s foreign trips.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">One set of persons have echoed the arguments used by Congress spokespersons Manish Tiwari and Jayanti Natarajan questioning my motives for demanding information that &ldquo;violates the privacy of Rahul Gandhi.&rdquo; A related argument is that parting with such information will jeopardize Rahul Gandhi&rsquo;s security. Both arguments sound absurd to me.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">As far as violating his privacy is concerned:</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; Rahul Gandhi is not a private citizen. He is an elected Member of Parliament answerable to citizens. Unlike ministers, MPs may not require prior government permission to go abroad. But I am told the established protocol is that MPs have to inform the Speaker when going abroad, especially if the House is in session. I intend to file an RTI with the Speaker of Lok Sabha to find if MPs in general, and Rahul Gandhi in particular, are observing this protocol.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; I have merely asked whether these were official trips or not. If some or all of these were official trips then citizens have a right to know about them.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; Gandhi is neither a secret service agent, nor a RAW or Intelligence Bureau official. Therefore, his foreign trips could not possibly be James bond style secret missions.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; Rahul Gandhi is a prime ministerial aspirant and the most influential person in the Congress Party after his mother Sonia Gandhi. He is known to influence government policy. Therefore, citizens have a right to put his public dealings to scrutiny.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; If some or all of these trips were private, merely disclosing which country he went to does not by any stretch of imagination infringe his privacy, unless he was doing something hanky-panky while abroad. Congress Party should avoid giving that impression by being so paranoid about his trips abroad.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; I have not sought to know who he spends his leisure hours or holidays with. I have merely asked whether he went on official business and what was the nature of the official business, if any. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The argument that it may jeopardize Rahul&rsquo;s security is absurd for the following reasons:</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; I have asked about his past trips, not those he plans to undertake in the future. He cannot be harmed by those he fears with retrospective effect.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; Information about prime ministerial, presidential trips is public knowledge unless they undertake some secret mission for the country. If their security is not compromised, how come information about Rahul Gandhi&rsquo;s trips needs to be protected more diligently than information regarding the trips undertaken by &nbsp;the Prime Minister of India or the President of the United States of America?</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The second set of responses has come from those who agree with my questions. But I find it strange that many of them have congratulated me for my &ldquo;brave&rdquo; act. Some have even expressed concern for my safety as though I have done something politically dangerous. This has surprised me more than the first set of hostile responses. I fail to understand, what is so brave about asking for such simple information? After all, I am not chasing information about some mafia don!</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">I wish Congressmen and women who have declared war on citizens demanding simple information about the affairs of their party president and her family would realize they are doing more harm than good. A party which prides itself on ushering in the Right to Information Act ought not to be so paranoid about the doings of its first family.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Or would they rather bring in a constitutional amendment saying the First Family of the Congress Party is exempt from all laws of the land?</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This would be in tune with the act of listing one and only person&mdash;namely Robert Vadra by name&mdash;as someone exempt from security check at airports while all others, such as the Prime Minister, Home Minister, Chief Justice of India etc. are exempt only on account of the high constitutional office they hold, not because they belong to some higher species.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 17318, 'title' => 'Absurd Arguments -Madhu Purnima Kishwar', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -Outlook </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>While some question my motives in seeking information on Rahul Gandhi's foreign trips, others say that parting with such information will jeopardize his security. Really?&nbsp;</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> I am really puzzled by some of the responses to my RTI regarding Rahul Gandhi&rsquo;s foreign trips. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> One set of persons have echoed the arguments used by Congress spokespersons Manish Tiwari and Jayanti Natarajan questioning my motives for demanding information that &ldquo;violates the privacy of Rahul Gandhi.&rdquo; A related argument is that parting with such information will jeopardize Rahul Gandhi&rsquo;s security. Both arguments sound absurd to me.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> As far as violating his privacy is concerned: </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; Rahul Gandhi is not a private citizen. He is an elected Member of Parliament answerable to citizens. Unlike ministers, MPs may not require prior government permission to go abroad. But I am told the established protocol is that MPs have to inform the Speaker when going abroad, especially if the House is in session. I intend to file an RTI with the Speaker of Lok Sabha to find if MPs in general, and Rahul Gandhi in particular, are observing this protocol. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; I have merely asked whether these were official trips or not. If some or all of these were official trips then citizens have a right to know about them. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; Gandhi is neither a secret service agent, nor a RAW or Intelligence Bureau official. Therefore, his foreign trips could not possibly be James bond style secret missions. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; Rahul Gandhi is a prime ministerial aspirant and the most influential person in the Congress Party after his mother Sonia Gandhi. He is known to influence government policy. Therefore, citizens have a right to put his public dealings to scrutiny. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; If some or all of these trips were private, merely disclosing which country he went to does not by any stretch of imagination infringe his privacy, unless he was doing something hanky-panky while abroad. Congress Party should avoid giving that impression by being so paranoid about his trips abroad. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; I have not sought to know who he spends his leisure hours or holidays with. I have merely asked whether he went on official business and what was the nature of the official business, if any. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The argument that it may jeopardize Rahul&rsquo;s security is absurd for the following reasons: </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; I have asked about his past trips, not those he plans to undertake in the future. He cannot be harmed by those he fears with retrospective effect. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; Information about prime ministerial, presidential trips is public knowledge unless they undertake some secret mission for the country. If their security is not compromised, how come information about Rahul Gandhi&rsquo;s trips needs to be protected more diligently than information regarding the trips undertaken by &nbsp;the Prime Minister of India or the President of the United States of America? </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The second set of responses has come from those who agree with my questions. But I find it strange that many of them have congratulated me for my &ldquo;brave&rdquo; act. Some have even expressed concern for my safety as though I have done something politically dangerous. This has surprised me more than the first set of hostile responses. I fail to understand, what is so brave about asking for such simple information? After all, I am not chasing information about some mafia don! </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> I wish Congressmen and women who have declared war on citizens demanding simple information about the affairs of their party president and her family would realize they are doing more harm than good. A party which prides itself on ushering in the Right to Information Act ought not to be so paranoid about the doings of its first family. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Or would they rather bring in a constitutional amendment saying the First Family of the Congress Party is exempt from all laws of the land? </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This would be in tune with the act of listing one and only person&mdash;namely Robert Vadra by name&mdash;as someone exempt from security check at airports while all others, such as the Prime Minister, Home Minister, Chief Justice of India etc. are exempt only on account of the high constitutional office they hold, not because they belong to some higher species. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Outlook, 8 October, 2012, http://www.outlookindia.com/article.aspx?282510', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'absurd-arguments-madhu-purnima-kishwar-17446', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17446, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 17318 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Absurd Arguments -Madhu Purnima Kishwar' $metaKeywords = 'Right to Information,rti' $metaDesc = ' -Outlook While some question my motives in seeking information on Rahul Gandhi's foreign trips, others say that parting with such information will jeopardize his security. Really?&nbsp; I am really puzzled by some of the responses to my RTI regarding Rahul Gandhi&rsquo;s foreign...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-Outlook</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>While some question my motives in seeking information on Rahul Gandhi's foreign trips, others say that parting with such information will jeopardize his security. Really?&nbsp;</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">I am really puzzled by some of the responses to my RTI regarding Rahul Gandhi&rsquo;s foreign trips.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">One set of persons have echoed the arguments used by Congress spokespersons Manish Tiwari and Jayanti Natarajan questioning my motives for demanding information that &ldquo;violates the privacy of Rahul Gandhi.&rdquo; A related argument is that parting with such information will jeopardize Rahul Gandhi&rsquo;s security. Both arguments sound absurd to me.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">As far as violating his privacy is concerned:</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; Rahul Gandhi is not a private citizen. He is an elected Member of Parliament answerable to citizens. Unlike ministers, MPs may not require prior government permission to go abroad. But I am told the established protocol is that MPs have to inform the Speaker when going abroad, especially if the House is in session. I intend to file an RTI with the Speaker of Lok Sabha to find if MPs in general, and Rahul Gandhi in particular, are observing this protocol.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; I have merely asked whether these were official trips or not. If some or all of these were official trips then citizens have a right to know about them.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; Gandhi is neither a secret service agent, nor a RAW or Intelligence Bureau official. Therefore, his foreign trips could not possibly be James bond style secret missions.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; Rahul Gandhi is a prime ministerial aspirant and the most influential person in the Congress Party after his mother Sonia Gandhi. He is known to influence government policy. Therefore, citizens have a right to put his public dealings to scrutiny.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; If some or all of these trips were private, merely disclosing which country he went to does not by any stretch of imagination infringe his privacy, unless he was doing something hanky-panky while abroad. Congress Party should avoid giving that impression by being so paranoid about his trips abroad.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; I have not sought to know who he spends his leisure hours or holidays with. I have merely asked whether he went on official business and what was the nature of the official business, if any. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The argument that it may jeopardize Rahul&rsquo;s security is absurd for the following reasons:</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; I have asked about his past trips, not those he plans to undertake in the future. He cannot be harmed by those he fears with retrospective effect.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; Information about prime ministerial, presidential trips is public knowledge unless they undertake some secret mission for the country. If their security is not compromised, how come information about Rahul Gandhi&rsquo;s trips needs to be protected more diligently than information regarding the trips undertaken by &nbsp;the Prime Minister of India or the President of the United States of America?</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The second set of responses has come from those who agree with my questions. But I find it strange that many of them have congratulated me for my &ldquo;brave&rdquo; act. Some have even expressed concern for my safety as though I have done something politically dangerous. This has surprised me more than the first set of hostile responses. I fail to understand, what is so brave about asking for such simple information? After all, I am not chasing information about some mafia don!</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">I wish Congressmen and women who have declared war on citizens demanding simple information about the affairs of their party president and her family would realize they are doing more harm than good. A party which prides itself on ushering in the Right to Information Act ought not to be so paranoid about the doings of its first family.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Or would they rather bring in a constitutional amendment saying the First Family of the Congress Party is exempt from all laws of the land?</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This would be in tune with the act of listing one and only person&mdash;namely Robert Vadra by name&mdash;as someone exempt from security check at airports while all others, such as the Prime Minister, Home Minister, Chief Justice of India etc. are exempt only on account of the high constitutional office they hold, not because they belong to some higher species.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/absurd-arguments-madhu-purnima-kishwar-17446.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Absurd Arguments -Madhu Purnima Kishwar | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -Outlook While some question my motives in seeking information on Rahul Gandhi's foreign trips, others say that parting with such information will jeopardize his security. Really? I am really puzzled by some of the responses to my RTI regarding Rahul Gandhi’s foreign..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Absurd Arguments -Madhu Purnima Kishwar</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-Outlook</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>While some question my motives in seeking information on Rahul Gandhi's foreign trips, others say that parting with such information will jeopardize his security. Really? </em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">I am really puzzled by some of the responses to my RTI regarding Rahul Gandhi’s foreign trips.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">One set of persons have echoed the arguments used by Congress spokespersons Manish Tiwari and Jayanti Natarajan questioning my motives for demanding information that “violates the privacy of Rahul Gandhi.” A related argument is that parting with such information will jeopardize Rahul Gandhi’s security. Both arguments sound absurd to me. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">As far as violating his privacy is concerned:</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"> Rahul Gandhi is not a private citizen. He is an elected Member of Parliament answerable to citizens. Unlike ministers, MPs may not require prior government permission to go abroad. But I am told the established protocol is that MPs have to inform the Speaker when going abroad, especially if the House is in session. I intend to file an RTI with the Speaker of Lok Sabha to find if MPs in general, and Rahul Gandhi in particular, are observing this protocol.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify"> I have merely asked whether these were official trips or not. If some or all of these were official trips then citizens have a right to know about them.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify"> Gandhi is neither a secret service agent, nor a RAW or Intelligence Bureau official. Therefore, his foreign trips could not possibly be James bond style secret missions.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify"> Rahul Gandhi is a prime ministerial aspirant and the most influential person in the Congress Party after his mother Sonia Gandhi. He is known to influence government policy. Therefore, citizens have a right to put his public dealings to scrutiny.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify"> If some or all of these trips were private, merely disclosing which country he went to does not by any stretch of imagination infringe his privacy, unless he was doing something hanky-panky while abroad. Congress Party should avoid giving that impression by being so paranoid about his trips abroad.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify"> I have not sought to know who he spends his leisure hours or holidays with. I have merely asked whether he went on official business and what was the nature of the official business, if any. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The argument that it may jeopardize Rahul’s security is absurd for the following reasons:</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"> I have asked about his past trips, not those he plans to undertake in the future. He cannot be harmed by those he fears with retrospective effect.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify"> Information about prime ministerial, presidential trips is public knowledge unless they undertake some secret mission for the country. If their security is not compromised, how come information about Rahul Gandhi’s trips needs to be protected more diligently than information regarding the trips undertaken by the Prime Minister of India or the President of the United States of America?</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The second set of responses has come from those who agree with my questions. But I find it strange that many of them have congratulated me for my “brave” act. Some have even expressed concern for my safety as though I have done something politically dangerous. This has surprised me more than the first set of hostile responses. I fail to understand, what is so brave about asking for such simple information? After all, I am not chasing information about some mafia don!</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">I wish Congressmen and women who have declared war on citizens demanding simple information about the affairs of their party president and her family would realize they are doing more harm than good. A party which prides itself on ushering in the Right to Information Act ought not to be so paranoid about the doings of its first family.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Or would they rather bring in a constitutional amendment saying the First Family of the Congress Party is exempt from all laws of the land?</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This would be in tune with the act of listing one and only person—namely Robert Vadra by name—as someone exempt from security check at airports while all others, such as the Prime Minister, Home Minister, Chief Justice of India etc. are exempt only on account of the high constitutional office they hold, not because they belong to some higher species.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681e4c7875396-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681e4c7875396-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr681e4c7875396-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681e4c7875396-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681e4c7875396-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681e4c7875396-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681e4c7875396-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr681e4c7875396-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr681e4c7875396-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 17318, 'title' => 'Absurd Arguments -Madhu Purnima Kishwar', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -Outlook </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>While some question my motives in seeking information on Rahul Gandhi's foreign trips, others say that parting with such information will jeopardize his security. Really?&nbsp;</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> I am really puzzled by some of the responses to my RTI regarding Rahul Gandhi&rsquo;s foreign trips. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> One set of persons have echoed the arguments used by Congress spokespersons Manish Tiwari and Jayanti Natarajan questioning my motives for demanding information that &ldquo;violates the privacy of Rahul Gandhi.&rdquo; A related argument is that parting with such information will jeopardize Rahul Gandhi&rsquo;s security. Both arguments sound absurd to me.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> As far as violating his privacy is concerned: </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; Rahul Gandhi is not a private citizen. He is an elected Member of Parliament answerable to citizens. Unlike ministers, MPs may not require prior government permission to go abroad. But I am told the established protocol is that MPs have to inform the Speaker when going abroad, especially if the House is in session. I intend to file an RTI with the Speaker of Lok Sabha to find if MPs in general, and Rahul Gandhi in particular, are observing this protocol. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; I have merely asked whether these were official trips or not. If some or all of these were official trips then citizens have a right to know about them. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; Gandhi is neither a secret service agent, nor a RAW or Intelligence Bureau official. Therefore, his foreign trips could not possibly be James bond style secret missions. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; Rahul Gandhi is a prime ministerial aspirant and the most influential person in the Congress Party after his mother Sonia Gandhi. He is known to influence government policy. Therefore, citizens have a right to put his public dealings to scrutiny. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; If some or all of these trips were private, merely disclosing which country he went to does not by any stretch of imagination infringe his privacy, unless he was doing something hanky-panky while abroad. Congress Party should avoid giving that impression by being so paranoid about his trips abroad. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; I have not sought to know who he spends his leisure hours or holidays with. I have merely asked whether he went on official business and what was the nature of the official business, if any. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The argument that it may jeopardize Rahul&rsquo;s security is absurd for the following reasons: </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; I have asked about his past trips, not those he plans to undertake in the future. He cannot be harmed by those he fears with retrospective effect. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; Information about prime ministerial, presidential trips is public knowledge unless they undertake some secret mission for the country. If their security is not compromised, how come information about Rahul Gandhi&rsquo;s trips needs to be protected more diligently than information regarding the trips undertaken by &nbsp;the Prime Minister of India or the President of the United States of America? </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The second set of responses has come from those who agree with my questions. But I find it strange that many of them have congratulated me for my &ldquo;brave&rdquo; act. Some have even expressed concern for my safety as though I have done something politically dangerous. This has surprised me more than the first set of hostile responses. I fail to understand, what is so brave about asking for such simple information? After all, I am not chasing information about some mafia don! </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> I wish Congressmen and women who have declared war on citizens demanding simple information about the affairs of their party president and her family would realize they are doing more harm than good. A party which prides itself on ushering in the Right to Information Act ought not to be so paranoid about the doings of its first family. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Or would they rather bring in a constitutional amendment saying the First Family of the Congress Party is exempt from all laws of the land? </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This would be in tune with the act of listing one and only person&mdash;namely Robert Vadra by name&mdash;as someone exempt from security check at airports while all others, such as the Prime Minister, Home Minister, Chief Justice of India etc. are exempt only on account of the high constitutional office they hold, not because they belong to some higher species. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Outlook, 8 October, 2012, http://www.outlookindia.com/article.aspx?282510', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'absurd-arguments-madhu-purnima-kishwar-17446', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17446, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 17318, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Absurd Arguments -Madhu Purnima Kishwar', 'metaKeywords' => 'Right to Information,rti', 'metaDesc' => ' -Outlook While some question my motives in seeking information on Rahul Gandhi's foreign trips, others say that parting with such information will jeopardize his security. Really?&nbsp; I am really puzzled by some of the responses to my RTI regarding Rahul Gandhi&rsquo;s foreign...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-Outlook</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>While some question my motives in seeking information on Rahul Gandhi's foreign trips, others say that parting with such information will jeopardize his security. Really?&nbsp;</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">I am really puzzled by some of the responses to my RTI regarding Rahul Gandhi&rsquo;s foreign trips.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">One set of persons have echoed the arguments used by Congress spokespersons Manish Tiwari and Jayanti Natarajan questioning my motives for demanding information that &ldquo;violates the privacy of Rahul Gandhi.&rdquo; A related argument is that parting with such information will jeopardize Rahul Gandhi&rsquo;s security. Both arguments sound absurd to me.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">As far as violating his privacy is concerned:</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; Rahul Gandhi is not a private citizen. He is an elected Member of Parliament answerable to citizens. Unlike ministers, MPs may not require prior government permission to go abroad. But I am told the established protocol is that MPs have to inform the Speaker when going abroad, especially if the House is in session. I intend to file an RTI with the Speaker of Lok Sabha to find if MPs in general, and Rahul Gandhi in particular, are observing this protocol.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; I have merely asked whether these were official trips or not. If some or all of these were official trips then citizens have a right to know about them.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; Gandhi is neither a secret service agent, nor a RAW or Intelligence Bureau official. Therefore, his foreign trips could not possibly be James bond style secret missions.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; Rahul Gandhi is a prime ministerial aspirant and the most influential person in the Congress Party after his mother Sonia Gandhi. He is known to influence government policy. Therefore, citizens have a right to put his public dealings to scrutiny.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; If some or all of these trips were private, merely disclosing which country he went to does not by any stretch of imagination infringe his privacy, unless he was doing something hanky-panky while abroad. Congress Party should avoid giving that impression by being so paranoid about his trips abroad.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; I have not sought to know who he spends his leisure hours or holidays with. I have merely asked whether he went on official business and what was the nature of the official business, if any. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The argument that it may jeopardize Rahul&rsquo;s security is absurd for the following reasons:</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; I have asked about his past trips, not those he plans to undertake in the future. He cannot be harmed by those he fears with retrospective effect.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; Information about prime ministerial, presidential trips is public knowledge unless they undertake some secret mission for the country. If their security is not compromised, how come information about Rahul Gandhi&rsquo;s trips needs to be protected more diligently than information regarding the trips undertaken by &nbsp;the Prime Minister of India or the President of the United States of America?</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The second set of responses has come from those who agree with my questions. But I find it strange that many of them have congratulated me for my &ldquo;brave&rdquo; act. Some have even expressed concern for my safety as though I have done something politically dangerous. This has surprised me more than the first set of hostile responses. I fail to understand, what is so brave about asking for such simple information? After all, I am not chasing information about some mafia don!</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">I wish Congressmen and women who have declared war on citizens demanding simple information about the affairs of their party president and her family would realize they are doing more harm than good. A party which prides itself on ushering in the Right to Information Act ought not to be so paranoid about the doings of its first family.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Or would they rather bring in a constitutional amendment saying the First Family of the Congress Party is exempt from all laws of the land?</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This would be in tune with the act of listing one and only person&mdash;namely Robert Vadra by name&mdash;as someone exempt from security check at airports while all others, such as the Prime Minister, Home Minister, Chief Justice of India etc. are exempt only on account of the high constitutional office they hold, not because they belong to some higher species.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 17318, 'title' => 'Absurd Arguments -Madhu Purnima Kishwar', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -Outlook </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>While some question my motives in seeking information on Rahul Gandhi's foreign trips, others say that parting with such information will jeopardize his security. Really?&nbsp;</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> I am really puzzled by some of the responses to my RTI regarding Rahul Gandhi&rsquo;s foreign trips. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> One set of persons have echoed the arguments used by Congress spokespersons Manish Tiwari and Jayanti Natarajan questioning my motives for demanding information that &ldquo;violates the privacy of Rahul Gandhi.&rdquo; A related argument is that parting with such information will jeopardize Rahul Gandhi&rsquo;s security. Both arguments sound absurd to me.&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> As far as violating his privacy is concerned: </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; Rahul Gandhi is not a private citizen. He is an elected Member of Parliament answerable to citizens. Unlike ministers, MPs may not require prior government permission to go abroad. But I am told the established protocol is that MPs have to inform the Speaker when going abroad, especially if the House is in session. I intend to file an RTI with the Speaker of Lok Sabha to find if MPs in general, and Rahul Gandhi in particular, are observing this protocol. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; I have merely asked whether these were official trips or not. If some or all of these were official trips then citizens have a right to know about them. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; Gandhi is neither a secret service agent, nor a RAW or Intelligence Bureau official. Therefore, his foreign trips could not possibly be James bond style secret missions. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; Rahul Gandhi is a prime ministerial aspirant and the most influential person in the Congress Party after his mother Sonia Gandhi. He is known to influence government policy. Therefore, citizens have a right to put his public dealings to scrutiny. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; If some or all of these trips were private, merely disclosing which country he went to does not by any stretch of imagination infringe his privacy, unless he was doing something hanky-panky while abroad. Congress Party should avoid giving that impression by being so paranoid about his trips abroad. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; I have not sought to know who he spends his leisure hours or holidays with. I have merely asked whether he went on official business and what was the nature of the official business, if any. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The argument that it may jeopardize Rahul&rsquo;s security is absurd for the following reasons: </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; I have asked about his past trips, not those he plans to undertake in the future. He cannot be harmed by those he fears with retrospective effect. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &nbsp; &nbsp; Information about prime ministerial, presidential trips is public knowledge unless they undertake some secret mission for the country. If their security is not compromised, how come information about Rahul Gandhi&rsquo;s trips needs to be protected more diligently than information regarding the trips undertaken by &nbsp;the Prime Minister of India or the President of the United States of America? </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The second set of responses has come from those who agree with my questions. But I find it strange that many of them have congratulated me for my &ldquo;brave&rdquo; act. Some have even expressed concern for my safety as though I have done something politically dangerous. This has surprised me more than the first set of hostile responses. I fail to understand, what is so brave about asking for such simple information? After all, I am not chasing information about some mafia don! </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> I wish Congressmen and women who have declared war on citizens demanding simple information about the affairs of their party president and her family would realize they are doing more harm than good. A party which prides itself on ushering in the Right to Information Act ought not to be so paranoid about the doings of its first family. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Or would they rather bring in a constitutional amendment saying the First Family of the Congress Party is exempt from all laws of the land? </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This would be in tune with the act of listing one and only person&mdash;namely Robert Vadra by name&mdash;as someone exempt from security check at airports while all others, such as the Prime Minister, Home Minister, Chief Justice of India etc. are exempt only on account of the high constitutional office they hold, not because they belong to some higher species. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Outlook, 8 October, 2012, http://www.outlookindia.com/article.aspx?282510', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'absurd-arguments-madhu-purnima-kishwar-17446', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17446, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 17318 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Absurd Arguments -Madhu Purnima Kishwar' $metaKeywords = 'Right to Information,rti' $metaDesc = ' -Outlook While some question my motives in seeking information on Rahul Gandhi's foreign trips, others say that parting with such information will jeopardize his security. Really?&nbsp; I am really puzzled by some of the responses to my RTI regarding Rahul Gandhi&rsquo;s foreign...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-Outlook</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>While some question my motives in seeking information on Rahul Gandhi's foreign trips, others say that parting with such information will jeopardize his security. Really?&nbsp;</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">I am really puzzled by some of the responses to my RTI regarding Rahul Gandhi&rsquo;s foreign trips.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">One set of persons have echoed the arguments used by Congress spokespersons Manish Tiwari and Jayanti Natarajan questioning my motives for demanding information that &ldquo;violates the privacy of Rahul Gandhi.&rdquo; A related argument is that parting with such information will jeopardize Rahul Gandhi&rsquo;s security. Both arguments sound absurd to me.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">As far as violating his privacy is concerned:</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; Rahul Gandhi is not a private citizen. He is an elected Member of Parliament answerable to citizens. Unlike ministers, MPs may not require prior government permission to go abroad. But I am told the established protocol is that MPs have to inform the Speaker when going abroad, especially if the House is in session. I intend to file an RTI with the Speaker of Lok Sabha to find if MPs in general, and Rahul Gandhi in particular, are observing this protocol.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; I have merely asked whether these were official trips or not. If some or all of these were official trips then citizens have a right to know about them.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; Gandhi is neither a secret service agent, nor a RAW or Intelligence Bureau official. Therefore, his foreign trips could not possibly be James bond style secret missions.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; Rahul Gandhi is a prime ministerial aspirant and the most influential person in the Congress Party after his mother Sonia Gandhi. He is known to influence government policy. Therefore, citizens have a right to put his public dealings to scrutiny.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; If some or all of these trips were private, merely disclosing which country he went to does not by any stretch of imagination infringe his privacy, unless he was doing something hanky-panky while abroad. Congress Party should avoid giving that impression by being so paranoid about his trips abroad.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; I have not sought to know who he spends his leisure hours or holidays with. I have merely asked whether he went on official business and what was the nature of the official business, if any. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The argument that it may jeopardize Rahul&rsquo;s security is absurd for the following reasons:</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; I have asked about his past trips, not those he plans to undertake in the future. He cannot be harmed by those he fears with retrospective effect.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp; &nbsp; Information about prime ministerial, presidential trips is public knowledge unless they undertake some secret mission for the country. If their security is not compromised, how come information about Rahul Gandhi&rsquo;s trips needs to be protected more diligently than information regarding the trips undertaken by &nbsp;the Prime Minister of India or the President of the United States of America?</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The second set of responses has come from those who agree with my questions. But I find it strange that many of them have congratulated me for my &ldquo;brave&rdquo; act. Some have even expressed concern for my safety as though I have done something politically dangerous. This has surprised me more than the first set of hostile responses. I fail to understand, what is so brave about asking for such simple information? After all, I am not chasing information about some mafia don!</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">I wish Congressmen and women who have declared war on citizens demanding simple information about the affairs of their party president and her family would realize they are doing more harm than good. A party which prides itself on ushering in the Right to Information Act ought not to be so paranoid about the doings of its first family.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Or would they rather bring in a constitutional amendment saying the First Family of the Congress Party is exempt from all laws of the land?</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This would be in tune with the act of listing one and only person&mdash;namely Robert Vadra by name&mdash;as someone exempt from security check at airports while all others, such as the Prime Minister, Home Minister, Chief Justice of India etc. are exempt only on account of the high constitutional office they hold, not because they belong to some higher species.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/absurd-arguments-madhu-purnima-kishwar-17446.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Absurd Arguments -Madhu Purnima Kishwar | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -Outlook While some question my motives in seeking information on Rahul Gandhi's foreign trips, others say that parting with such information will jeopardize his security. Really? I am really puzzled by some of the responses to my RTI regarding Rahul Gandhi’s foreign..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Absurd Arguments -Madhu Purnima Kishwar</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-Outlook</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>While some question my motives in seeking information on Rahul Gandhi's foreign trips, others say that parting with such information will jeopardize his security. Really? </em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">I am really puzzled by some of the responses to my RTI regarding Rahul Gandhi’s foreign trips.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">One set of persons have echoed the arguments used by Congress spokespersons Manish Tiwari and Jayanti Natarajan questioning my motives for demanding information that “violates the privacy of Rahul Gandhi.” A related argument is that parting with such information will jeopardize Rahul Gandhi’s security. Both arguments sound absurd to me. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">As far as violating his privacy is concerned:</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"> Rahul Gandhi is not a private citizen. He is an elected Member of Parliament answerable to citizens. Unlike ministers, MPs may not require prior government permission to go abroad. But I am told the established protocol is that MPs have to inform the Speaker when going abroad, especially if the House is in session. I intend to file an RTI with the Speaker of Lok Sabha to find if MPs in general, and Rahul Gandhi in particular, are observing this protocol.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify"> I have merely asked whether these were official trips or not. If some or all of these were official trips then citizens have a right to know about them.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify"> Gandhi is neither a secret service agent, nor a RAW or Intelligence Bureau official. Therefore, his foreign trips could not possibly be James bond style secret missions.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify"> Rahul Gandhi is a prime ministerial aspirant and the most influential person in the Congress Party after his mother Sonia Gandhi. He is known to influence government policy. Therefore, citizens have a right to put his public dealings to scrutiny.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify"> If some or all of these trips were private, merely disclosing which country he went to does not by any stretch of imagination infringe his privacy, unless he was doing something hanky-panky while abroad. Congress Party should avoid giving that impression by being so paranoid about his trips abroad.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify"> I have not sought to know who he spends his leisure hours or holidays with. I have merely asked whether he went on official business and what was the nature of the official business, if any. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The argument that it may jeopardize Rahul’s security is absurd for the following reasons:</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"> I have asked about his past trips, not those he plans to undertake in the future. He cannot be harmed by those he fears with retrospective effect.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify"> Information about prime ministerial, presidential trips is public knowledge unless they undertake some secret mission for the country. If their security is not compromised, how come information about Rahul Gandhi’s trips needs to be protected more diligently than information regarding the trips undertaken by the Prime Minister of India or the President of the United States of America?</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The second set of responses has come from those who agree with my questions. But I find it strange that many of them have congratulated me for my “brave” act. Some have even expressed concern for my safety as though I have done something politically dangerous. This has surprised me more than the first set of hostile responses. I fail to understand, what is so brave about asking for such simple information? After all, I am not chasing information about some mafia don!</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">I wish Congressmen and women who have declared war on citizens demanding simple information about the affairs of their party president and her family would realize they are doing more harm than good. A party which prides itself on ushering in the Right to Information Act ought not to be so paranoid about the doings of its first family.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Or would they rather bring in a constitutional amendment saying the First Family of the Congress Party is exempt from all laws of the land?</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This would be in tune with the act of listing one and only person—namely Robert Vadra by name—as someone exempt from security check at airports while all others, such as the Prime Minister, Home Minister, Chief Justice of India etc. are exempt only on account of the high constitutional office they hold, not because they belong to some higher species.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 17318, 'title' => 'Absurd Arguments -Madhu Purnima Kishwar', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -Outlook </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>While some question my motives in seeking information on Rahul Gandhi's foreign trips, others say that parting with such information will jeopardize his security. Really? </em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> I am really puzzled by some of the responses to my RTI regarding Rahul Gandhi’s foreign trips. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> One set of persons have echoed the arguments used by Congress spokespersons Manish Tiwari and Jayanti Natarajan questioning my motives for demanding information that “violates the privacy of Rahul Gandhi.” A related argument is that parting with such information will jeopardize Rahul Gandhi’s security. Both arguments sound absurd to me. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> As far as violating his privacy is concerned: </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Rahul Gandhi is not a private citizen. He is an elected Member of Parliament answerable to citizens. Unlike ministers, MPs may not require prior government permission to go abroad. But I am told the established protocol is that MPs have to inform the Speaker when going abroad, especially if the House is in session. I intend to file an RTI with the Speaker of Lok Sabha to find if MPs in general, and Rahul Gandhi in particular, are observing this protocol. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> I have merely asked whether these were official trips or not. If some or all of these were official trips then citizens have a right to know about them. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Gandhi is neither a secret service agent, nor a RAW or Intelligence Bureau official. Therefore, his foreign trips could not possibly be James bond style secret missions. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Rahul Gandhi is a prime ministerial aspirant and the most influential person in the Congress Party after his mother Sonia Gandhi. He is known to influence government policy. Therefore, citizens have a right to put his public dealings to scrutiny. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> If some or all of these trips were private, merely disclosing which country he went to does not by any stretch of imagination infringe his privacy, unless he was doing something hanky-panky while abroad. Congress Party should avoid giving that impression by being so paranoid about his trips abroad. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> I have not sought to know who he spends his leisure hours or holidays with. I have merely asked whether he went on official business and what was the nature of the official business, if any. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The argument that it may jeopardize Rahul’s security is absurd for the following reasons: </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> I have asked about his past trips, not those he plans to undertake in the future. He cannot be harmed by those he fears with retrospective effect. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Information about prime ministerial, presidential trips is public knowledge unless they undertake some secret mission for the country. If their security is not compromised, how come information about Rahul Gandhi’s trips needs to be protected more diligently than information regarding the trips undertaken by the Prime Minister of India or the President of the United States of America? </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The second set of responses has come from those who agree with my questions. But I find it strange that many of them have congratulated me for my “brave” act. Some have even expressed concern for my safety as though I have done something politically dangerous. This has surprised me more than the first set of hostile responses. I fail to understand, what is so brave about asking for such simple information? After all, I am not chasing information about some mafia don! </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> I wish Congressmen and women who have declared war on citizens demanding simple information about the affairs of their party president and her family would realize they are doing more harm than good. A party which prides itself on ushering in the Right to Information Act ought not to be so paranoid about the doings of its first family. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Or would they rather bring in a constitutional amendment saying the First Family of the Congress Party is exempt from all laws of the land? </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This would be in tune with the act of listing one and only person—namely Robert Vadra by name—as someone exempt from security check at airports while all others, such as the Prime Minister, Home Minister, Chief Justice of India etc. are exempt only on account of the high constitutional office they hold, not because they belong to some higher species. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Outlook, 8 October, 2012, http://www.outlookindia.com/article.aspx?282510', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'absurd-arguments-madhu-purnima-kishwar-17446', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17446, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 17318, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Absurd Arguments -Madhu Purnima Kishwar', 'metaKeywords' => 'Right to Information,rti', 'metaDesc' => ' -Outlook While some question my motives in seeking information on Rahul Gandhi's foreign trips, others say that parting with such information will jeopardize his security. Really? I am really puzzled by some of the responses to my RTI regarding Rahul Gandhi’s foreign...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-Outlook</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>While some question my motives in seeking information on Rahul Gandhi's foreign trips, others say that parting with such information will jeopardize his security. Really? </em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">I am really puzzled by some of the responses to my RTI regarding Rahul Gandhi’s foreign trips.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">One set of persons have echoed the arguments used by Congress spokespersons Manish Tiwari and Jayanti Natarajan questioning my motives for demanding information that “violates the privacy of Rahul Gandhi.” A related argument is that parting with such information will jeopardize Rahul Gandhi’s security. Both arguments sound absurd to me. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">As far as violating his privacy is concerned:</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"> Rahul Gandhi is not a private citizen. He is an elected Member of Parliament answerable to citizens. Unlike ministers, MPs may not require prior government permission to go abroad. But I am told the established protocol is that MPs have to inform the Speaker when going abroad, especially if the House is in session. I intend to file an RTI with the Speaker of Lok Sabha to find if MPs in general, and Rahul Gandhi in particular, are observing this protocol.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify"> I have merely asked whether these were official trips or not. If some or all of these were official trips then citizens have a right to know about them.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify"> Gandhi is neither a secret service agent, nor a RAW or Intelligence Bureau official. Therefore, his foreign trips could not possibly be James bond style secret missions.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify"> Rahul Gandhi is a prime ministerial aspirant and the most influential person in the Congress Party after his mother Sonia Gandhi. He is known to influence government policy. Therefore, citizens have a right to put his public dealings to scrutiny.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify"> If some or all of these trips were private, merely disclosing which country he went to does not by any stretch of imagination infringe his privacy, unless he was doing something hanky-panky while abroad. Congress Party should avoid giving that impression by being so paranoid about his trips abroad.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify"> I have not sought to know who he spends his leisure hours or holidays with. I have merely asked whether he went on official business and what was the nature of the official business, if any. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The argument that it may jeopardize Rahul’s security is absurd for the following reasons:</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"> I have asked about his past trips, not those he plans to undertake in the future. He cannot be harmed by those he fears with retrospective effect.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify"> Information about prime ministerial, presidential trips is public knowledge unless they undertake some secret mission for the country. If their security is not compromised, how come information about Rahul Gandhi’s trips needs to be protected more diligently than information regarding the trips undertaken by the Prime Minister of India or the President of the United States of America?</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The second set of responses has come from those who agree with my questions. But I find it strange that many of them have congratulated me for my “brave” act. Some have even expressed concern for my safety as though I have done something politically dangerous. This has surprised me more than the first set of hostile responses. I fail to understand, what is so brave about asking for such simple information? After all, I am not chasing information about some mafia don!</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">I wish Congressmen and women who have declared war on citizens demanding simple information about the affairs of their party president and her family would realize they are doing more harm than good. A party which prides itself on ushering in the Right to Information Act ought not to be so paranoid about the doings of its first family.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Or would they rather bring in a constitutional amendment saying the First Family of the Congress Party is exempt from all laws of the land?</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This would be in tune with the act of listing one and only person—namely Robert Vadra by name—as someone exempt from security check at airports while all others, such as the Prime Minister, Home Minister, Chief Justice of India etc. are exempt only on account of the high constitutional office they hold, not because they belong to some higher species.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 17318, 'title' => 'Absurd Arguments -Madhu Purnima Kishwar', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -Outlook </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>While some question my motives in seeking information on Rahul Gandhi's foreign trips, others say that parting with such information will jeopardize his security. Really? </em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> I am really puzzled by some of the responses to my RTI regarding Rahul Gandhi’s foreign trips. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> One set of persons have echoed the arguments used by Congress spokespersons Manish Tiwari and Jayanti Natarajan questioning my motives for demanding information that “violates the privacy of Rahul Gandhi.” A related argument is that parting with such information will jeopardize Rahul Gandhi’s security. Both arguments sound absurd to me. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> As far as violating his privacy is concerned: </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Rahul Gandhi is not a private citizen. He is an elected Member of Parliament answerable to citizens. Unlike ministers, MPs may not require prior government permission to go abroad. But I am told the established protocol is that MPs have to inform the Speaker when going abroad, especially if the House is in session. I intend to file an RTI with the Speaker of Lok Sabha to find if MPs in general, and Rahul Gandhi in particular, are observing this protocol. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> I have merely asked whether these were official trips or not. If some or all of these were official trips then citizens have a right to know about them. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Gandhi is neither a secret service agent, nor a RAW or Intelligence Bureau official. Therefore, his foreign trips could not possibly be James bond style secret missions. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Rahul Gandhi is a prime ministerial aspirant and the most influential person in the Congress Party after his mother Sonia Gandhi. He is known to influence government policy. Therefore, citizens have a right to put his public dealings to scrutiny. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> If some or all of these trips were private, merely disclosing which country he went to does not by any stretch of imagination infringe his privacy, unless he was doing something hanky-panky while abroad. Congress Party should avoid giving that impression by being so paranoid about his trips abroad. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> I have not sought to know who he spends his leisure hours or holidays with. I have merely asked whether he went on official business and what was the nature of the official business, if any. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The argument that it may jeopardize Rahul’s security is absurd for the following reasons: </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> I have asked about his past trips, not those he plans to undertake in the future. He cannot be harmed by those he fears with retrospective effect. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Information about prime ministerial, presidential trips is public knowledge unless they undertake some secret mission for the country. If their security is not compromised, how come information about Rahul Gandhi’s trips needs to be protected more diligently than information regarding the trips undertaken by the Prime Minister of India or the President of the United States of America? </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The second set of responses has come from those who agree with my questions. But I find it strange that many of them have congratulated me for my “brave” act. Some have even expressed concern for my safety as though I have done something politically dangerous. This has surprised me more than the first set of hostile responses. I fail to understand, what is so brave about asking for such simple information? After all, I am not chasing information about some mafia don! </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> I wish Congressmen and women who have declared war on citizens demanding simple information about the affairs of their party president and her family would realize they are doing more harm than good. A party which prides itself on ushering in the Right to Information Act ought not to be so paranoid about the doings of its first family. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Or would they rather bring in a constitutional amendment saying the First Family of the Congress Party is exempt from all laws of the land? </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This would be in tune with the act of listing one and only person—namely Robert Vadra by name—as someone exempt from security check at airports while all others, such as the Prime Minister, Home Minister, Chief Justice of India etc. are exempt only on account of the high constitutional office they hold, not because they belong to some higher species. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Outlook, 8 October, 2012, http://www.outlookindia.com/article.aspx?282510', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'absurd-arguments-madhu-purnima-kishwar-17446', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 17446, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 17318 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Absurd Arguments -Madhu Purnima Kishwar' $metaKeywords = 'Right to Information,rti' $metaDesc = ' -Outlook While some question my motives in seeking information on Rahul Gandhi's foreign trips, others say that parting with such information will jeopardize his security. Really? I am really puzzled by some of the responses to my RTI regarding Rahul Gandhi’s foreign...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-Outlook</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>While some question my motives in seeking information on Rahul Gandhi's foreign trips, others say that parting with such information will jeopardize his security. Really? </em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">I am really puzzled by some of the responses to my RTI regarding Rahul Gandhi’s foreign trips.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">One set of persons have echoed the arguments used by Congress spokespersons Manish Tiwari and Jayanti Natarajan questioning my motives for demanding information that “violates the privacy of Rahul Gandhi.” A related argument is that parting with such information will jeopardize Rahul Gandhi’s security. Both arguments sound absurd to me. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">As far as violating his privacy is concerned:</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"> Rahul Gandhi is not a private citizen. He is an elected Member of Parliament answerable to citizens. Unlike ministers, MPs may not require prior government permission to go abroad. But I am told the established protocol is that MPs have to inform the Speaker when going abroad, especially if the House is in session. I intend to file an RTI with the Speaker of Lok Sabha to find if MPs in general, and Rahul Gandhi in particular, are observing this protocol.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify"> I have merely asked whether these were official trips or not. If some or all of these were official trips then citizens have a right to know about them.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify"> Gandhi is neither a secret service agent, nor a RAW or Intelligence Bureau official. Therefore, his foreign trips could not possibly be James bond style secret missions.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify"> Rahul Gandhi is a prime ministerial aspirant and the most influential person in the Congress Party after his mother Sonia Gandhi. He is known to influence government policy. Therefore, citizens have a right to put his public dealings to scrutiny.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify"> If some or all of these trips were private, merely disclosing which country he went to does not by any stretch of imagination infringe his privacy, unless he was doing something hanky-panky while abroad. Congress Party should avoid giving that impression by being so paranoid about his trips abroad.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify"> I have not sought to know who he spends his leisure hours or holidays with. I have merely asked whether he went on official business and what was the nature of the official business, if any. </div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The argument that it may jeopardize Rahul’s security is absurd for the following reasons:</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"> I have asked about his past trips, not those he plans to undertake in the future. He cannot be harmed by those he fears with retrospective effect.</div><div style="text-align: justify"> </div><div style="text-align: justify"> Information about prime ministerial, presidential trips is public knowledge unless they undertake some secret mission for the country. If their security is not compromised, how come information about Rahul Gandhi’s trips needs to be protected more diligently than information regarding the trips undertaken by the Prime Minister of India or the President of the United States of America?</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The second set of responses has come from those who agree with my questions. But I find it strange that many of them have congratulated me for my “brave” act. Some have even expressed concern for my safety as though I have done something politically dangerous. This has surprised me more than the first set of hostile responses. I fail to understand, what is so brave about asking for such simple information? After all, I am not chasing information about some mafia don!</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">I wish Congressmen and women who have declared war on citizens demanding simple information about the affairs of their party president and her family would realize they are doing more harm than good. A party which prides itself on ushering in the Right to Information Act ought not to be so paranoid about the doings of its first family.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Or would they rather bring in a constitutional amendment saying the First Family of the Congress Party is exempt from all laws of the land?</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This would be in tune with the act of listing one and only person—namely Robert Vadra by name—as someone exempt from security check at airports while all others, such as the Prime Minister, Home Minister, Chief Justice of India etc. are exempt only on account of the high constitutional office they hold, not because they belong to some higher species.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Absurd Arguments -Madhu Purnima Kishwar |
-Outlook While some question my motives in seeking information on Rahul Gandhi's foreign trips, others say that parting with such information will jeopardize his security. Really? I am really puzzled by some of the responses to my RTI regarding Rahul Gandhi’s foreign trips. One set of persons have echoed the arguments used by Congress spokespersons Manish Tiwari and Jayanti Natarajan questioning my motives for demanding information that “violates the privacy of Rahul Gandhi.” A related argument is that parting with such information will jeopardize Rahul Gandhi’s security. Both arguments sound absurd to me. As far as violating his privacy is concerned: Rahul Gandhi is not a private citizen. He is an elected Member of Parliament answerable to citizens. Unlike ministers, MPs may not require prior government permission to go abroad. But I am told the established protocol is that MPs have to inform the Speaker when going abroad, especially if the House is in session. I intend to file an RTI with the Speaker of Lok Sabha to find if MPs in general, and Rahul Gandhi in particular, are observing this protocol. I have merely asked whether these were official trips or not. If some or all of these were official trips then citizens have a right to know about them. Gandhi is neither a secret service agent, nor a RAW or Intelligence Bureau official. Therefore, his foreign trips could not possibly be James bond style secret missions. Rahul Gandhi is a prime ministerial aspirant and the most influential person in the Congress Party after his mother Sonia Gandhi. He is known to influence government policy. Therefore, citizens have a right to put his public dealings to scrutiny. If some or all of these trips were private, merely disclosing which country he went to does not by any stretch of imagination infringe his privacy, unless he was doing something hanky-panky while abroad. Congress Party should avoid giving that impression by being so paranoid about his trips abroad. I have not sought to know who he spends his leisure hours or holidays with. I have merely asked whether he went on official business and what was the nature of the official business, if any. The argument that it may jeopardize Rahul’s security is absurd for the following reasons: I have asked about his past trips, not those he plans to undertake in the future. He cannot be harmed by those he fears with retrospective effect. Information about prime ministerial, presidential trips is public knowledge unless they undertake some secret mission for the country. If their security is not compromised, how come information about Rahul Gandhi’s trips needs to be protected more diligently than information regarding the trips undertaken by the Prime Minister of India or the President of the United States of America? The second set of responses has come from those who agree with my questions. But I find it strange that many of them have congratulated me for my “brave” act. Some have even expressed concern for my safety as though I have done something politically dangerous. This has surprised me more than the first set of hostile responses. I fail to understand, what is so brave about asking for such simple information? After all, I am not chasing information about some mafia don! I wish Congressmen and women who have declared war on citizens demanding simple information about the affairs of their party president and her family would realize they are doing more harm than good. A party which prides itself on ushering in the Right to Information Act ought not to be so paranoid about the doings of its first family. Or would they rather bring in a constitutional amendment saying the First Family of the Congress Party is exempt from all laws of the land? This would be in tune with the act of listing one and only person—namely Robert Vadra by name—as someone exempt from security check at airports while all others, such as the Prime Minister, Home Minister, Chief Justice of India etc. are exempt only on account of the high constitutional office they hold, not because they belong to some higher species.
|