Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/activist-finds-holes-in-rti-rules-sugandha-pathak-16574/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/activist-finds-holes-in-rti-rules-sugandha-pathak-16574/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/activist-finds-holes-in-rti-rules-sugandha-pathak-16574/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/activist-finds-holes-in-rti-rules-sugandha-pathak-16574/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5d1db77c2c-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5d1db77c2c-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f5d1db77c2c-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5d1db77c2c-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5d1db77c2c-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5d1db77c2c-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5d1db77c2c-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f5d1db77c2c-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f5d1db77c2c-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16446,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Activist finds holes in RTI rules-Sugandha Pathak&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
-Deccan Herald
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Proposed amendment criticised for being harsh on applicants&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;A proposed amendment in the Right to Information Act may end up diluting the Act, according to an RTI activist.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
The amendment will make it mandatory for an appellant to be present in person or send a representative during case hearing by the Centre of Information Centre (CIC).
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;ldquo;The appellant may be present in person, through an authorised representative or through video conferencing at the time of hearing of the appeal by the CIC,&amp;rdquo; states a notification on this amendment by the department of personnel and training (DOPT) on July 31.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;ldquo;Where the CIC is satisfied with the existing circumstances due to which the appellant is unable to attend the hearing, then it may afford another opportunity of hearing before a final decision is taken,&amp;rdquo; the notification stated.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
However, RTI activist Lokesh Batra, who has been following discussions on RTI amendments since 2010, said this notification has not been posted officially on DoPT&amp;rsquo;s website. Batra said not giving an appellant the option to attend one&amp;rsquo;s hearing &amp;mdash; which was allowed earlier &amp;mdash; will lead to people filing less number of RTI applications.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;ldquo;Earlier, the appellate authority, usually a judge, would come to a decision after going through documents submitted by the appellant and then send a written reply,&amp;rdquo; said Batra. Now, the amendment states that if the appellant cannot make it to the hearing of the case, then the person should send at least a representative.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;ldquo;There is also no mention about audio conferencing (telephone call), which used to be allowed. How will it be possible for people living across the country or even abroad to appear for hearing?&amp;rdquo; said Batra.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;ldquo;The commissions are located in New Delhi and people from different parts of the country will have to come to the Capital to attend hearings, and that too at personal cost,&amp;rdquo; he said.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
Another amendment which Batra feels does not make sense is that a public authority may allow any representative or any related officer to present their side of the case.&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
Batra said this clause will violate the provisions of the RTI Act, Section 19(5), which states: &amp;ldquo;In any appeal proceedings, the onus to prove that a denial of a request was justified shall be on the central public information officer (CPIO) or the state public information officer, as the case may be, who denied the request.&amp;rdquo;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
Batra said in the proposed rule, the CPIO need not be present during hearing and instead, the public authority can depute a representative or another official. &amp;ldquo;The result will be that lawyers who can represent the CPIOs at taxpayers&amp;rsquo; cost or a junior official will be deputed by the public authority, contravening the Act,&amp;rdquo; he added.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
He said the Rs 50 postal fee and 500-word limit in RTI applications are not good.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;ldquo;But it is clearly mentioned in the notification that one can&amp;rsquo;t reject an RTI application for crossing the 500-word limit,&amp;rdquo; he said.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;Deccan Herald, 12 August, 2012, http://www.deccanherald.com/content/271217/activist-finds-holes-rti-rules.html&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;activist-finds-holes-in-rti-rules-sugandha-pathak-16574&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 16574,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 16446,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Activist finds holes in RTI rules-Sugandha Pathak&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Right to Information,rti&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-Deccan Herald





Proposed amendment criticised for being harsh on applicants






A proposed amendment in the Right to Information Act may end up diluting the Act, according to an RTI activist.&amp;nbsp;





The amendment will make it mandatory for an appellant to be present in...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;-Deccan Herald&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Proposed amendment criticised for being harsh on applicants&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;A proposed amendment in the Right to Information Act may end up diluting the Act, according to an RTI activist.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The amendment will make it mandatory for an appellant to be present in person or send a representative during case hearing by the Centre of Information Centre (CIC).&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&amp;ldquo;The appellant may be present in person, through an authorised representative or through video conferencing at the time of hearing of the appeal by the CIC,&amp;rdquo; states a notification on this amendment by the department of personnel and training (DOPT) on July 31.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&amp;ldquo;Where the CIC is satisfied with the existing circumstances due to which the appellant is unable to attend the hearing, then it may afford another opportunity of hearing before a final decision is taken,&amp;rdquo; the notification stated.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;However, RTI activist Lokesh Batra, who has been following discussions on RTI amendments since 2010, said this notification has not been posted officially on DoPT&amp;rsquo;s website. Batra said not giving an appellant the option to attend one&amp;rsquo;s hearing &amp;mdash; which was allowed earlier &amp;mdash; will lead to people filing less number of RTI applications.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&amp;ldquo;Earlier, the appellate authority, usually a judge, would come to a decision after going through documents submitted by the appellant and then send a written reply,&amp;rdquo; said Batra. Now, the amendment states that if the appellant cannot make it to the hearing of the case, then the person should send at least a representative.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&amp;ldquo;There is also no mention about audio conferencing (telephone call), which used to be allowed. How will it be possible for people living across the country or even abroad to appear for hearing?&amp;rdquo; said Batra.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&amp;ldquo;The commissions are located in New Delhi and people from different parts of the country will have to come to the Capital to attend hearings, and that too at personal cost,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Another amendment which Batra feels does not make sense is that a public authority may allow any representative or any related officer to present their side of the case.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Batra said this clause will violate the provisions of the RTI Act, Section 19(5), which states: &amp;ldquo;In any appeal proceedings, the onus to prove that a denial of a request was justified shall be on the central public information officer (CPIO) or the state public information officer, as the case may be, who denied the request.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Batra said in the proposed rule, the CPIO need not be present during hearing and instead, the public authority can depute a representative or another official. &amp;ldquo;The result will be that lawyers who can represent the CPIOs at taxpayers&amp;rsquo; cost or a junior official will be deputed by the public authority, contravening the Act,&amp;rdquo; he added.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;He said the Rs 50 postal fee and 500-word limit in RTI applications are not good.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&amp;ldquo;But it is clearly mentioned in the notification that one can&amp;rsquo;t reject an RTI application for crossing the 500-word limit,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16446,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Activist finds holes in RTI rules-Sugandha Pathak&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
-Deccan Herald
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Proposed amendment criticised for being harsh on applicants&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;A proposed amendment in the Right to Information Act may end up diluting the Act, according to an RTI activist.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
The amendment will make it mandatory for an appellant to be present in person or send a representative during case hearing by the Centre of Information Centre (CIC).
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;ldquo;The appellant may be present in person, through an authorised representative or through video conferencing at the time of hearing of the appeal by the CIC,&amp;rdquo; states a notification on this amendment by the department of personnel and training (DOPT) on July 31.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;ldquo;Where the CIC is satisfied with the existing circumstances due to which the appellant is unable to attend the hearing, then it may afford another opportunity of hearing before a final decision is taken,&amp;rdquo; the notification stated.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
However, RTI activist Lokesh Batra, who has been following discussions on RTI amendments since 2010, said this notification has not been posted officially on DoPT&amp;rsquo;s website. Batra said not giving an appellant the option to attend one&amp;rsquo;s hearing &amp;mdash; which was allowed earlier &amp;mdash; will lead to people filing less number of RTI applications.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;ldquo;Earlier, the appellate authority, usually a judge, would come to a decision after going through documents submitted by the appellant and then send a written reply,&amp;rdquo; said Batra. Now, the amendment states that if the appellant cannot make it to the hearing of the case, then the person should send at least a representative.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;ldquo;There is also no mention about audio conferencing (telephone call), which used to be allowed. How will it be possible for people living across the country or even abroad to appear for hearing?&amp;rdquo; said Batra.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;ldquo;The commissions are located in New Delhi and people from different parts of the country will have to come to the Capital to attend hearings, and that too at personal cost,&amp;rdquo; he said.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
Another amendment which Batra feels does not make sense is that a public authority may allow any representative or any related officer to present their side of the case.&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
Batra said this clause will violate the provisions of the RTI Act, Section 19(5), which states: &amp;ldquo;In any appeal proceedings, the onus to prove that a denial of a request was justified shall be on the central public information officer (CPIO) or the state public information officer, as the case may be, who denied the request.&amp;rdquo;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
Batra said in the proposed rule, the CPIO need not be present during hearing and instead, the public authority can depute a representative or another official. &amp;ldquo;The result will be that lawyers who can represent the CPIOs at taxpayers&amp;rsquo; cost or a junior official will be deputed by the public authority, contravening the Act,&amp;rdquo; he added.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
He said the Rs 50 postal fee and 500-word limit in RTI applications are not good.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;ldquo;But it is clearly mentioned in the notification that one can&amp;rsquo;t reject an RTI application for crossing the 500-word limit,&amp;rdquo; he said.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;Deccan Herald, 12 August, 2012, http://www.deccanherald.com/content/271217/activist-finds-holes-rti-rules.html&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;activist-finds-holes-in-rti-rules-sugandha-pathak-16574&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 16574,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 16446
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Activist finds holes in RTI rules-Sugandha Pathak&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Right to Information,rti&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-Deccan Herald





Proposed amendment criticised for being harsh on applicants






A proposed amendment in the Right to Information Act may end up diluting the Act, according to an RTI activist.&amp;nbsp;





The amendment will make it mandatory for an appellant to be present in...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;-Deccan Herald&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Proposed amendment criticised for being harsh on applicants&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;A proposed amendment in the Right to Information Act may end up diluting the Act, according to an RTI activist.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The amendment will make it mandatory for an appellant to be present in person or send a representative during case hearing by the Centre of Information Centre (CIC).&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&amp;ldquo;The appellant may be present in person, through an authorised representative or through video conferencing at the time of hearing of the appeal by the CIC,&amp;rdquo; states a notification on this amendment by the department of personnel and training (DOPT) on July 31.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&amp;ldquo;Where the CIC is satisfied with the existing circumstances due to which the appellant is unable to attend the hearing, then it may afford another opportunity of hearing before a final decision is taken,&amp;rdquo; the notification stated.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;However, RTI activist Lokesh Batra, who has been following discussions on RTI amendments since 2010, said this notification has not been posted officially on DoPT&amp;rsquo;s website. Batra said not giving an appellant the option to attend one&amp;rsquo;s hearing &amp;mdash; which was allowed earlier &amp;mdash; will lead to people filing less number of RTI applications.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&amp;ldquo;Earlier, the appellate authority, usually a judge, would come to a decision after going through documents submitted by the appellant and then send a written reply,&amp;rdquo; said Batra. Now, the amendment states that if the appellant cannot make it to the hearing of the case, then the person should send at least a representative.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&amp;ldquo;There is also no mention about audio conferencing (telephone call), which used to be allowed. How will it be possible for people living across the country or even abroad to appear for hearing?&amp;rdquo; said Batra.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&amp;ldquo;The commissions are located in New Delhi and people from different parts of the country will have to come to the Capital to attend hearings, and that too at personal cost,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Another amendment which Batra feels does not make sense is that a public authority may allow any representative or any related officer to present their side of the case.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Batra said this clause will violate the provisions of the RTI Act, Section 19(5), which states: &amp;ldquo;In any appeal proceedings, the onus to prove that a denial of a request was justified shall be on the central public information officer (CPIO) or the state public information officer, as the case may be, who denied the request.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Batra said in the proposed rule, the CPIO need not be present during hearing and instead, the public authority can depute a representative or another official. &amp;ldquo;The result will be that lawyers who can represent the CPIOs at taxpayers&amp;rsquo; cost or a junior official will be deputed by the public authority, contravening the Act,&amp;rdquo; he added.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;He said the Rs 50 postal fee and 500-word limit in RTI applications are not good.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&amp;ldquo;But it is clearly mentioned in the notification that one can&amp;rsquo;t reject an RTI application for crossing the 500-word limit,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/activist-finds-holes-in-rti-rules-sugandha-pathak-16574.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Activist finds holes in RTI rules-Sugandha Pathak | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-Deccan Herald





Proposed amendment criticised for being harsh on applicants






A proposed amendment in the Right to Information Act may end up diluting the Act, according to an RTI activist.&nbsp;





The amendment will make it mandatory for an appellant to be present in..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Activist finds holes in RTI rules-Sugandha Pathak</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div style="text-align: justify">-Deccan Herald</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Proposed amendment criticised for being harsh on applicants</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><br /></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>A proposed amendment in the Right to Information Act may end up diluting the Act, according to an RTI activist.&nbsp;</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The amendment will make it mandatory for an appellant to be present in person or send a representative during case hearing by the Centre of Information Centre (CIC).</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;The appellant may be present in person, through an authorised representative or through video conferencing at the time of hearing of the appeal by the CIC,&rdquo; states a notification on this amendment by the department of personnel and training (DOPT) on July 31.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;Where the CIC is satisfied with the existing circumstances due to which the appellant is unable to attend the hearing, then it may afford another opportunity of hearing before a final decision is taken,&rdquo; the notification stated.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, RTI activist Lokesh Batra, who has been following discussions on RTI amendments since 2010, said this notification has not been posted officially on DoPT&rsquo;s website. Batra said not giving an appellant the option to attend one&rsquo;s hearing &mdash; which was allowed earlier &mdash; will lead to people filing less number of RTI applications.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;Earlier, the appellate authority, usually a judge, would come to a decision after going through documents submitted by the appellant and then send a written reply,&rdquo; said Batra. Now, the amendment states that if the appellant cannot make it to the hearing of the case, then the person should send at least a representative.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;There is also no mention about audio conferencing (telephone call), which used to be allowed. How will it be possible for people living across the country or even abroad to appear for hearing?&rdquo; said Batra.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;The commissions are located in New Delhi and people from different parts of the country will have to come to the Capital to attend hearings, and that too at personal cost,&rdquo; he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Another amendment which Batra feels does not make sense is that a public authority may allow any representative or any related officer to present their side of the case.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Batra said this clause will violate the provisions of the RTI Act, Section 19(5), which states: &ldquo;In any appeal proceedings, the onus to prove that a denial of a request was justified shall be on the central public information officer (CPIO) or the state public information officer, as the case may be, who denied the request.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Batra said in the proposed rule, the CPIO need not be present during hearing and instead, the public authority can depute a representative or another official. &ldquo;The result will be that lawyers who can represent the CPIOs at taxpayers&rsquo; cost or a junior official will be deputed by the public authority, contravening the Act,&rdquo; he added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He said the Rs 50 postal fee and 500-word limit in RTI applications are not good.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;But it is clearly mentioned in the notification that one can&rsquo;t reject an RTI application for crossing the 500-word limit,&rdquo; he said.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5d1db77c2c-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5d1db77c2c-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f5d1db77c2c-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5d1db77c2c-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5d1db77c2c-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5d1db77c2c-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5d1db77c2c-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f5d1db77c2c-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f5d1db77c2c-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16446,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Activist finds holes in RTI rules-Sugandha Pathak&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
-Deccan Herald
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Proposed amendment criticised for being harsh on applicants&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;A proposed amendment in the Right to Information Act may end up diluting the Act, according to an RTI activist.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
The amendment will make it mandatory for an appellant to be present in person or send a representative during case hearing by the Centre of Information Centre (CIC).
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;ldquo;The appellant may be present in person, through an authorised representative or through video conferencing at the time of hearing of the appeal by the CIC,&amp;rdquo; states a notification on this amendment by the department of personnel and training (DOPT) on July 31.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;ldquo;Where the CIC is satisfied with the existing circumstances due to which the appellant is unable to attend the hearing, then it may afford another opportunity of hearing before a final decision is taken,&amp;rdquo; the notification stated.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
However, RTI activist Lokesh Batra, who has been following discussions on RTI amendments since 2010, said this notification has not been posted officially on DoPT&amp;rsquo;s website. Batra said not giving an appellant the option to attend one&amp;rsquo;s hearing &amp;mdash; which was allowed earlier &amp;mdash; will lead to people filing less number of RTI applications.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;ldquo;Earlier, the appellate authority, usually a judge, would come to a decision after going through documents submitted by the appellant and then send a written reply,&amp;rdquo; said Batra. Now, the amendment states that if the appellant cannot make it to the hearing of the case, then the person should send at least a representative.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;ldquo;There is also no mention about audio conferencing (telephone call), which used to be allowed. How will it be possible for people living across the country or even abroad to appear for hearing?&amp;rdquo; said Batra.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;ldquo;The commissions are located in New Delhi and people from different parts of the country will have to come to the Capital to attend hearings, and that too at personal cost,&amp;rdquo; he said.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
Another amendment which Batra feels does not make sense is that a public authority may allow any representative or any related officer to present their side of the case.&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
Batra said this clause will violate the provisions of the RTI Act, Section 19(5), which states: &amp;ldquo;In any appeal proceedings, the onus to prove that a denial of a request was justified shall be on the central public information officer (CPIO) or the state public information officer, as the case may be, who denied the request.&amp;rdquo;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
Batra said in the proposed rule, the CPIO need not be present during hearing and instead, the public authority can depute a representative or another official. &amp;ldquo;The result will be that lawyers who can represent the CPIOs at taxpayers&amp;rsquo; cost or a junior official will be deputed by the public authority, contravening the Act,&amp;rdquo; he added.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
He said the Rs 50 postal fee and 500-word limit in RTI applications are not good.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;ldquo;But it is clearly mentioned in the notification that one can&amp;rsquo;t reject an RTI application for crossing the 500-word limit,&amp;rdquo; he said.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;Deccan Herald, 12 August, 2012, http://www.deccanherald.com/content/271217/activist-finds-holes-rti-rules.html&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;activist-finds-holes-in-rti-rules-sugandha-pathak-16574&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 16574,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 16446,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Activist finds holes in RTI rules-Sugandha Pathak&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Right to Information,rti&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-Deccan Herald





Proposed amendment criticised for being harsh on applicants






A proposed amendment in the Right to Information Act may end up diluting the Act, according to an RTI activist.&amp;nbsp;





The amendment will make it mandatory for an appellant to be present in...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;-Deccan Herald&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Proposed amendment criticised for being harsh on applicants&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;A proposed amendment in the Right to Information Act may end up diluting the Act, according to an RTI activist.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The amendment will make it mandatory for an appellant to be present in person or send a representative during case hearing by the Centre of Information Centre (CIC).&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&amp;ldquo;The appellant may be present in person, through an authorised representative or through video conferencing at the time of hearing of the appeal by the CIC,&amp;rdquo; states a notification on this amendment by the department of personnel and training (DOPT) on July 31.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&amp;ldquo;Where the CIC is satisfied with the existing circumstances due to which the appellant is unable to attend the hearing, then it may afford another opportunity of hearing before a final decision is taken,&amp;rdquo; the notification stated.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;However, RTI activist Lokesh Batra, who has been following discussions on RTI amendments since 2010, said this notification has not been posted officially on DoPT&amp;rsquo;s website. Batra said not giving an appellant the option to attend one&amp;rsquo;s hearing &amp;mdash; which was allowed earlier &amp;mdash; will lead to people filing less number of RTI applications.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&amp;ldquo;Earlier, the appellate authority, usually a judge, would come to a decision after going through documents submitted by the appellant and then send a written reply,&amp;rdquo; said Batra. Now, the amendment states that if the appellant cannot make it to the hearing of the case, then the person should send at least a representative.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&amp;ldquo;There is also no mention about audio conferencing (telephone call), which used to be allowed. How will it be possible for people living across the country or even abroad to appear for hearing?&amp;rdquo; said Batra.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&amp;ldquo;The commissions are located in New Delhi and people from different parts of the country will have to come to the Capital to attend hearings, and that too at personal cost,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Another amendment which Batra feels does not make sense is that a public authority may allow any representative or any related officer to present their side of the case.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Batra said this clause will violate the provisions of the RTI Act, Section 19(5), which states: &amp;ldquo;In any appeal proceedings, the onus to prove that a denial of a request was justified shall be on the central public information officer (CPIO) or the state public information officer, as the case may be, who denied the request.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Batra said in the proposed rule, the CPIO need not be present during hearing and instead, the public authority can depute a representative or another official. &amp;ldquo;The result will be that lawyers who can represent the CPIOs at taxpayers&amp;rsquo; cost or a junior official will be deputed by the public authority, contravening the Act,&amp;rdquo; he added.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;He said the Rs 50 postal fee and 500-word limit in RTI applications are not good.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&amp;ldquo;But it is clearly mentioned in the notification that one can&amp;rsquo;t reject an RTI application for crossing the 500-word limit,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16446,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Activist finds holes in RTI rules-Sugandha Pathak&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
-Deccan Herald
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Proposed amendment criticised for being harsh on applicants&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;A proposed amendment in the Right to Information Act may end up diluting the Act, according to an RTI activist.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
The amendment will make it mandatory for an appellant to be present in person or send a representative during case hearing by the Centre of Information Centre (CIC).
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;ldquo;The appellant may be present in person, through an authorised representative or through video conferencing at the time of hearing of the appeal by the CIC,&amp;rdquo; states a notification on this amendment by the department of personnel and training (DOPT) on July 31.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;ldquo;Where the CIC is satisfied with the existing circumstances due to which the appellant is unable to attend the hearing, then it may afford another opportunity of hearing before a final decision is taken,&amp;rdquo; the notification stated.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
However, RTI activist Lokesh Batra, who has been following discussions on RTI amendments since 2010, said this notification has not been posted officially on DoPT&amp;rsquo;s website. Batra said not giving an appellant the option to attend one&amp;rsquo;s hearing &amp;mdash; which was allowed earlier &amp;mdash; will lead to people filing less number of RTI applications.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;ldquo;Earlier, the appellate authority, usually a judge, would come to a decision after going through documents submitted by the appellant and then send a written reply,&amp;rdquo; said Batra. Now, the amendment states that if the appellant cannot make it to the hearing of the case, then the person should send at least a representative.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;ldquo;There is also no mention about audio conferencing (telephone call), which used to be allowed. How will it be possible for people living across the country or even abroad to appear for hearing?&amp;rdquo; said Batra.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;ldquo;The commissions are located in New Delhi and people from different parts of the country will have to come to the Capital to attend hearings, and that too at personal cost,&amp;rdquo; he said.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
Another amendment which Batra feels does not make sense is that a public authority may allow any representative or any related officer to present their side of the case.&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
Batra said this clause will violate the provisions of the RTI Act, Section 19(5), which states: &amp;ldquo;In any appeal proceedings, the onus to prove that a denial of a request was justified shall be on the central public information officer (CPIO) or the state public information officer, as the case may be, who denied the request.&amp;rdquo;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
Batra said in the proposed rule, the CPIO need not be present during hearing and instead, the public authority can depute a representative or another official. &amp;ldquo;The result will be that lawyers who can represent the CPIOs at taxpayers&amp;rsquo; cost or a junior official will be deputed by the public authority, contravening the Act,&amp;rdquo; he added.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
He said the Rs 50 postal fee and 500-word limit in RTI applications are not good.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;ldquo;But it is clearly mentioned in the notification that one can&amp;rsquo;t reject an RTI application for crossing the 500-word limit,&amp;rdquo; he said.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;Deccan Herald, 12 August, 2012, http://www.deccanherald.com/content/271217/activist-finds-holes-rti-rules.html&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;activist-finds-holes-in-rti-rules-sugandha-pathak-16574&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 16574,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 16446
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Activist finds holes in RTI rules-Sugandha Pathak&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Right to Information,rti&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-Deccan Herald





Proposed amendment criticised for being harsh on applicants






A proposed amendment in the Right to Information Act may end up diluting the Act, according to an RTI activist.&amp;nbsp;





The amendment will make it mandatory for an appellant to be present in...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;-Deccan Herald&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Proposed amendment criticised for being harsh on applicants&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;A proposed amendment in the Right to Information Act may end up diluting the Act, according to an RTI activist.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The amendment will make it mandatory for an appellant to be present in person or send a representative during case hearing by the Centre of Information Centre (CIC).&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&amp;ldquo;The appellant may be present in person, through an authorised representative or through video conferencing at the time of hearing of the appeal by the CIC,&amp;rdquo; states a notification on this amendment by the department of personnel and training (DOPT) on July 31.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&amp;ldquo;Where the CIC is satisfied with the existing circumstances due to which the appellant is unable to attend the hearing, then it may afford another opportunity of hearing before a final decision is taken,&amp;rdquo; the notification stated.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;However, RTI activist Lokesh Batra, who has been following discussions on RTI amendments since 2010, said this notification has not been posted officially on DoPT&amp;rsquo;s website. Batra said not giving an appellant the option to attend one&amp;rsquo;s hearing &amp;mdash; which was allowed earlier &amp;mdash; will lead to people filing less number of RTI applications.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&amp;ldquo;Earlier, the appellate authority, usually a judge, would come to a decision after going through documents submitted by the appellant and then send a written reply,&amp;rdquo; said Batra. Now, the amendment states that if the appellant cannot make it to the hearing of the case, then the person should send at least a representative.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&amp;ldquo;There is also no mention about audio conferencing (telephone call), which used to be allowed. How will it be possible for people living across the country or even abroad to appear for hearing?&amp;rdquo; said Batra.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&amp;ldquo;The commissions are located in New Delhi and people from different parts of the country will have to come to the Capital to attend hearings, and that too at personal cost,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Another amendment which Batra feels does not make sense is that a public authority may allow any representative or any related officer to present their side of the case.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Batra said this clause will violate the provisions of the RTI Act, Section 19(5), which states: &amp;ldquo;In any appeal proceedings, the onus to prove that a denial of a request was justified shall be on the central public information officer (CPIO) or the state public information officer, as the case may be, who denied the request.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Batra said in the proposed rule, the CPIO need not be present during hearing and instead, the public authority can depute a representative or another official. &amp;ldquo;The result will be that lawyers who can represent the CPIOs at taxpayers&amp;rsquo; cost or a junior official will be deputed by the public authority, contravening the Act,&amp;rdquo; he added.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;He said the Rs 50 postal fee and 500-word limit in RTI applications are not good.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&amp;ldquo;But it is clearly mentioned in the notification that one can&amp;rsquo;t reject an RTI application for crossing the 500-word limit,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/activist-finds-holes-in-rti-rules-sugandha-pathak-16574.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Activist finds holes in RTI rules-Sugandha Pathak | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-Deccan Herald





Proposed amendment criticised for being harsh on applicants






A proposed amendment in the Right to Information Act may end up diluting the Act, according to an RTI activist.&nbsp;





The amendment will make it mandatory for an appellant to be present in..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Activist finds holes in RTI rules-Sugandha Pathak</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div style="text-align: justify">-Deccan Herald</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Proposed amendment criticised for being harsh on applicants</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><br /></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>A proposed amendment in the Right to Information Act may end up diluting the Act, according to an RTI activist.&nbsp;</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The amendment will make it mandatory for an appellant to be present in person or send a representative during case hearing by the Centre of Information Centre (CIC).</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;The appellant may be present in person, through an authorised representative or through video conferencing at the time of hearing of the appeal by the CIC,&rdquo; states a notification on this amendment by the department of personnel and training (DOPT) on July 31.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;Where the CIC is satisfied with the existing circumstances due to which the appellant is unable to attend the hearing, then it may afford another opportunity of hearing before a final decision is taken,&rdquo; the notification stated.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, RTI activist Lokesh Batra, who has been following discussions on RTI amendments since 2010, said this notification has not been posted officially on DoPT&rsquo;s website. Batra said not giving an appellant the option to attend one&rsquo;s hearing &mdash; which was allowed earlier &mdash; will lead to people filing less number of RTI applications.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;Earlier, the appellate authority, usually a judge, would come to a decision after going through documents submitted by the appellant and then send a written reply,&rdquo; said Batra. Now, the amendment states that if the appellant cannot make it to the hearing of the case, then the person should send at least a representative.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;There is also no mention about audio conferencing (telephone call), which used to be allowed. How will it be possible for people living across the country or even abroad to appear for hearing?&rdquo; said Batra.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;The commissions are located in New Delhi and people from different parts of the country will have to come to the Capital to attend hearings, and that too at personal cost,&rdquo; he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Another amendment which Batra feels does not make sense is that a public authority may allow any representative or any related officer to present their side of the case.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Batra said this clause will violate the provisions of the RTI Act, Section 19(5), which states: &ldquo;In any appeal proceedings, the onus to prove that a denial of a request was justified shall be on the central public information officer (CPIO) or the state public information officer, as the case may be, who denied the request.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Batra said in the proposed rule, the CPIO need not be present during hearing and instead, the public authority can depute a representative or another official. &ldquo;The result will be that lawyers who can represent the CPIOs at taxpayers&rsquo; cost or a junior official will be deputed by the public authority, contravening the Act,&rdquo; he added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He said the Rs 50 postal fee and 500-word limit in RTI applications are not good.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;But it is clearly mentioned in the notification that one can&rsquo;t reject an RTI application for crossing the 500-word limit,&rdquo; he said.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5d1db77c2c-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5d1db77c2c-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f5d1db77c2c-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5d1db77c2c-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5d1db77c2c-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5d1db77c2c-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5d1db77c2c-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f5d1db77c2c-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f5d1db77c2c-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16446,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Activist finds holes in RTI rules-Sugandha Pathak&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
-Deccan Herald
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Proposed amendment criticised for being harsh on applicants&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;A proposed amendment in the Right to Information Act may end up diluting the Act, according to an RTI activist.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
The amendment will make it mandatory for an appellant to be present in person or send a representative during case hearing by the Centre of Information Centre (CIC).
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;ldquo;The appellant may be present in person, through an authorised representative or through video conferencing at the time of hearing of the appeal by the CIC,&amp;rdquo; states a notification on this amendment by the department of personnel and training (DOPT) on July 31.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;ldquo;Where the CIC is satisfied with the existing circumstances due to which the appellant is unable to attend the hearing, then it may afford another opportunity of hearing before a final decision is taken,&amp;rdquo; the notification stated.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
However, RTI activist Lokesh Batra, who has been following discussions on RTI amendments since 2010, said this notification has not been posted officially on DoPT&amp;rsquo;s website. Batra said not giving an appellant the option to attend one&amp;rsquo;s hearing &amp;mdash; which was allowed earlier &amp;mdash; will lead to people filing less number of RTI applications.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;ldquo;Earlier, the appellate authority, usually a judge, would come to a decision after going through documents submitted by the appellant and then send a written reply,&amp;rdquo; said Batra. Now, the amendment states that if the appellant cannot make it to the hearing of the case, then the person should send at least a representative.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;ldquo;There is also no mention about audio conferencing (telephone call), which used to be allowed. How will it be possible for people living across the country or even abroad to appear for hearing?&amp;rdquo; said Batra.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;ldquo;The commissions are located in New Delhi and people from different parts of the country will have to come to the Capital to attend hearings, and that too at personal cost,&amp;rdquo; he said.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
Another amendment which Batra feels does not make sense is that a public authority may allow any representative or any related officer to present their side of the case.&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
Batra said this clause will violate the provisions of the RTI Act, Section 19(5), which states: &amp;ldquo;In any appeal proceedings, the onus to prove that a denial of a request was justified shall be on the central public information officer (CPIO) or the state public information officer, as the case may be, who denied the request.&amp;rdquo;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
Batra said in the proposed rule, the CPIO need not be present during hearing and instead, the public authority can depute a representative or another official. &amp;ldquo;The result will be that lawyers who can represent the CPIOs at taxpayers&amp;rsquo; cost or a junior official will be deputed by the public authority, contravening the Act,&amp;rdquo; he added.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
He said the Rs 50 postal fee and 500-word limit in RTI applications are not good.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;ldquo;But it is clearly mentioned in the notification that one can&amp;rsquo;t reject an RTI application for crossing the 500-word limit,&amp;rdquo; he said.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;Deccan Herald, 12 August, 2012, http://www.deccanherald.com/content/271217/activist-finds-holes-rti-rules.html&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;activist-finds-holes-in-rti-rules-sugandha-pathak-16574&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 16574,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 16446,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Activist finds holes in RTI rules-Sugandha Pathak&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Right to Information,rti&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-Deccan Herald





Proposed amendment criticised for being harsh on applicants






A proposed amendment in the Right to Information Act may end up diluting the Act, according to an RTI activist.&amp;nbsp;





The amendment will make it mandatory for an appellant to be present in...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;-Deccan Herald&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Proposed amendment criticised for being harsh on applicants&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;A proposed amendment in the Right to Information Act may end up diluting the Act, according to an RTI activist.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The amendment will make it mandatory for an appellant to be present in person or send a representative during case hearing by the Centre of Information Centre (CIC).&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&amp;ldquo;The appellant may be present in person, through an authorised representative or through video conferencing at the time of hearing of the appeal by the CIC,&amp;rdquo; states a notification on this amendment by the department of personnel and training (DOPT) on July 31.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&amp;ldquo;Where the CIC is satisfied with the existing circumstances due to which the appellant is unable to attend the hearing, then it may afford another opportunity of hearing before a final decision is taken,&amp;rdquo; the notification stated.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;However, RTI activist Lokesh Batra, who has been following discussions on RTI amendments since 2010, said this notification has not been posted officially on DoPT&amp;rsquo;s website. Batra said not giving an appellant the option to attend one&amp;rsquo;s hearing &amp;mdash; which was allowed earlier &amp;mdash; will lead to people filing less number of RTI applications.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&amp;ldquo;Earlier, the appellate authority, usually a judge, would come to a decision after going through documents submitted by the appellant and then send a written reply,&amp;rdquo; said Batra. Now, the amendment states that if the appellant cannot make it to the hearing of the case, then the person should send at least a representative.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&amp;ldquo;There is also no mention about audio conferencing (telephone call), which used to be allowed. How will it be possible for people living across the country or even abroad to appear for hearing?&amp;rdquo; said Batra.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&amp;ldquo;The commissions are located in New Delhi and people from different parts of the country will have to come to the Capital to attend hearings, and that too at personal cost,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Another amendment which Batra feels does not make sense is that a public authority may allow any representative or any related officer to present their side of the case.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Batra said this clause will violate the provisions of the RTI Act, Section 19(5), which states: &amp;ldquo;In any appeal proceedings, the onus to prove that a denial of a request was justified shall be on the central public information officer (CPIO) or the state public information officer, as the case may be, who denied the request.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Batra said in the proposed rule, the CPIO need not be present during hearing and instead, the public authority can depute a representative or another official. &amp;ldquo;The result will be that lawyers who can represent the CPIOs at taxpayers&amp;rsquo; cost or a junior official will be deputed by the public authority, contravening the Act,&amp;rdquo; he added.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;He said the Rs 50 postal fee and 500-word limit in RTI applications are not good.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&amp;ldquo;But it is clearly mentioned in the notification that one can&amp;rsquo;t reject an RTI application for crossing the 500-word limit,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16446,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Activist finds holes in RTI rules-Sugandha Pathak&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
-Deccan Herald
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Proposed amendment criticised for being harsh on applicants&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;A proposed amendment in the Right to Information Act may end up diluting the Act, according to an RTI activist.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
The amendment will make it mandatory for an appellant to be present in person or send a representative during case hearing by the Centre of Information Centre (CIC).
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;ldquo;The appellant may be present in person, through an authorised representative or through video conferencing at the time of hearing of the appeal by the CIC,&amp;rdquo; states a notification on this amendment by the department of personnel and training (DOPT) on July 31.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;ldquo;Where the CIC is satisfied with the existing circumstances due to which the appellant is unable to attend the hearing, then it may afford another opportunity of hearing before a final decision is taken,&amp;rdquo; the notification stated.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
However, RTI activist Lokesh Batra, who has been following discussions on RTI amendments since 2010, said this notification has not been posted officially on DoPT&amp;rsquo;s website. Batra said not giving an appellant the option to attend one&amp;rsquo;s hearing &amp;mdash; which was allowed earlier &amp;mdash; will lead to people filing less number of RTI applications.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;ldquo;Earlier, the appellate authority, usually a judge, would come to a decision after going through documents submitted by the appellant and then send a written reply,&amp;rdquo; said Batra. Now, the amendment states that if the appellant cannot make it to the hearing of the case, then the person should send at least a representative.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;ldquo;There is also no mention about audio conferencing (telephone call), which used to be allowed. How will it be possible for people living across the country or even abroad to appear for hearing?&amp;rdquo; said Batra.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;ldquo;The commissions are located in New Delhi and people from different parts of the country will have to come to the Capital to attend hearings, and that too at personal cost,&amp;rdquo; he said.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
Another amendment which Batra feels does not make sense is that a public authority may allow any representative or any related officer to present their side of the case.&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
Batra said this clause will violate the provisions of the RTI Act, Section 19(5), which states: &amp;ldquo;In any appeal proceedings, the onus to prove that a denial of a request was justified shall be on the central public information officer (CPIO) or the state public information officer, as the case may be, who denied the request.&amp;rdquo;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
Batra said in the proposed rule, the CPIO need not be present during hearing and instead, the public authority can depute a representative or another official. &amp;ldquo;The result will be that lawyers who can represent the CPIOs at taxpayers&amp;rsquo; cost or a junior official will be deputed by the public authority, contravening the Act,&amp;rdquo; he added.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
He said the Rs 50 postal fee and 500-word limit in RTI applications are not good.
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;
&amp;ldquo;But it is clearly mentioned in the notification that one can&amp;rsquo;t reject an RTI application for crossing the 500-word limit,&amp;rdquo; he said.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;Deccan Herald, 12 August, 2012, http://www.deccanherald.com/content/271217/activist-finds-holes-rti-rules.html&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;activist-finds-holes-in-rti-rules-sugandha-pathak-16574&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 16574,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 16446
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Activist finds holes in RTI rules-Sugandha Pathak&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Right to Information,rti&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-Deccan Herald





Proposed amendment criticised for being harsh on applicants






A proposed amendment in the Right to Information Act may end up diluting the Act, according to an RTI activist.&amp;nbsp;





The amendment will make it mandatory for an appellant to be present in...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;-Deccan Herald&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Proposed amendment criticised for being harsh on applicants&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;A proposed amendment in the Right to Information Act may end up diluting the Act, according to an RTI activist.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;The amendment will make it mandatory for an appellant to be present in person or send a representative during case hearing by the Centre of Information Centre (CIC).&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&amp;ldquo;The appellant may be present in person, through an authorised representative or through video conferencing at the time of hearing of the appeal by the CIC,&amp;rdquo; states a notification on this amendment by the department of personnel and training (DOPT) on July 31.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&amp;ldquo;Where the CIC is satisfied with the existing circumstances due to which the appellant is unable to attend the hearing, then it may afford another opportunity of hearing before a final decision is taken,&amp;rdquo; the notification stated.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;However, RTI activist Lokesh Batra, who has been following discussions on RTI amendments since 2010, said this notification has not been posted officially on DoPT&amp;rsquo;s website. Batra said not giving an appellant the option to attend one&amp;rsquo;s hearing &amp;mdash; which was allowed earlier &amp;mdash; will lead to people filing less number of RTI applications.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&amp;ldquo;Earlier, the appellate authority, usually a judge, would come to a decision after going through documents submitted by the appellant and then send a written reply,&amp;rdquo; said Batra. Now, the amendment states that if the appellant cannot make it to the hearing of the case, then the person should send at least a representative.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&amp;ldquo;There is also no mention about audio conferencing (telephone call), which used to be allowed. How will it be possible for people living across the country or even abroad to appear for hearing?&amp;rdquo; said Batra.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&amp;ldquo;The commissions are located in New Delhi and people from different parts of the country will have to come to the Capital to attend hearings, and that too at personal cost,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Another amendment which Batra feels does not make sense is that a public authority may allow any representative or any related officer to present their side of the case.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Batra said this clause will violate the provisions of the RTI Act, Section 19(5), which states: &amp;ldquo;In any appeal proceedings, the onus to prove that a denial of a request was justified shall be on the central public information officer (CPIO) or the state public information officer, as the case may be, who denied the request.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;Batra said in the proposed rule, the CPIO need not be present during hearing and instead, the public authority can depute a representative or another official. &amp;ldquo;The result will be that lawyers who can represent the CPIOs at taxpayers&amp;rsquo; cost or a junior official will be deputed by the public authority, contravening the Act,&amp;rdquo; he added.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;He said the Rs 50 postal fee and 500-word limit in RTI applications are not good.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&amp;ldquo;But it is clearly mentioned in the notification that one can&amp;rsquo;t reject an RTI application for crossing the 500-word limit,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/activist-finds-holes-in-rti-rules-sugandha-pathak-16574.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Activist finds holes in RTI rules-Sugandha Pathak | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-Deccan Herald





Proposed amendment criticised for being harsh on applicants






A proposed amendment in the Right to Information Act may end up diluting the Act, according to an RTI activist.&nbsp;





The amendment will make it mandatory for an appellant to be present in..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Activist finds holes in RTI rules-Sugandha Pathak</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div style="text-align: justify">-Deccan Herald</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Proposed amendment criticised for being harsh on applicants</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><br /></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>A proposed amendment in the Right to Information Act may end up diluting the Act, according to an RTI activist.&nbsp;</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The amendment will make it mandatory for an appellant to be present in person or send a representative during case hearing by the Centre of Information Centre (CIC).</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;The appellant may be present in person, through an authorised representative or through video conferencing at the time of hearing of the appeal by the CIC,&rdquo; states a notification on this amendment by the department of personnel and training (DOPT) on July 31.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;Where the CIC is satisfied with the existing circumstances due to which the appellant is unable to attend the hearing, then it may afford another opportunity of hearing before a final decision is taken,&rdquo; the notification stated.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, RTI activist Lokesh Batra, who has been following discussions on RTI amendments since 2010, said this notification has not been posted officially on DoPT&rsquo;s website. Batra said not giving an appellant the option to attend one&rsquo;s hearing &mdash; which was allowed earlier &mdash; will lead to people filing less number of RTI applications.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;Earlier, the appellate authority, usually a judge, would come to a decision after going through documents submitted by the appellant and then send a written reply,&rdquo; said Batra. Now, the amendment states that if the appellant cannot make it to the hearing of the case, then the person should send at least a representative.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;There is also no mention about audio conferencing (telephone call), which used to be allowed. How will it be possible for people living across the country or even abroad to appear for hearing?&rdquo; said Batra.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;The commissions are located in New Delhi and people from different parts of the country will have to come to the Capital to attend hearings, and that too at personal cost,&rdquo; he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Another amendment which Batra feels does not make sense is that a public authority may allow any representative or any related officer to present their side of the case.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Batra said this clause will violate the provisions of the RTI Act, Section 19(5), which states: &ldquo;In any appeal proceedings, the onus to prove that a denial of a request was justified shall be on the central public information officer (CPIO) or the state public information officer, as the case may be, who denied the request.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Batra said in the proposed rule, the CPIO need not be present during hearing and instead, the public authority can depute a representative or another official. &ldquo;The result will be that lawyers who can represent the CPIOs at taxpayers&rsquo; cost or a junior official will be deputed by the public authority, contravening the Act,&rdquo; he added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He said the Rs 50 postal fee and 500-word limit in RTI applications are not good.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;But it is clearly mentioned in the notification that one can&rsquo;t reject an RTI application for crossing the 500-word limit,&rdquo; he said.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 16446,
		'title' => 'Activist finds holes in RTI rules-Sugandha Pathak',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify">
-Deccan Herald
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
<br />
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
<em>Proposed amendment criticised for being harsh on applicants</em>
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
<em><br />
</em>
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
<em>A proposed amendment in the Right to Information Act may end up diluting the Act, according to an RTI activist.&nbsp;</em>
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
<br />
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
The amendment will make it mandatory for an appellant to be present in person or send a representative during case hearing by the Centre of Information Centre (CIC).
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
<br />
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
&ldquo;The appellant may be present in person, through an authorised representative or through video conferencing at the time of hearing of the appeal by the CIC,&rdquo; states a notification on this amendment by the department of personnel and training (DOPT) on July 31.
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
<br />
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
&ldquo;Where the CIC is satisfied with the existing circumstances due to which the appellant is unable to attend the hearing, then it may afford another opportunity of hearing before a final decision is taken,&rdquo; the notification stated.
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
<br />
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
However, RTI activist Lokesh Batra, who has been following discussions on RTI amendments since 2010, said this notification has not been posted officially on DoPT&rsquo;s website. Batra said not giving an appellant the option to attend one&rsquo;s hearing &mdash; which was allowed earlier &mdash; will lead to people filing less number of RTI applications.
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
<br />
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
&ldquo;Earlier, the appellate authority, usually a judge, would come to a decision after going through documents submitted by the appellant and then send a written reply,&rdquo; said Batra. Now, the amendment states that if the appellant cannot make it to the hearing of the case, then the person should send at least a representative.
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
<br />
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
&ldquo;There is also no mention about audio conferencing (telephone call), which used to be allowed. How will it be possible for people living across the country or even abroad to appear for hearing?&rdquo; said Batra.
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
<br />
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
&ldquo;The commissions are located in New Delhi and people from different parts of the country will have to come to the Capital to attend hearings, and that too at personal cost,&rdquo; he said.
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
<br />
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
Another amendment which Batra feels does not make sense is that a public authority may allow any representative or any related officer to present their side of the case.&nbsp;
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
<br />
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
Batra said this clause will violate the provisions of the RTI Act, Section 19(5), which states: &ldquo;In any appeal proceedings, the onus to prove that a denial of a request was justified shall be on the central public information officer (CPIO) or the state public information officer, as the case may be, who denied the request.&rdquo;
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
<br />
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
Batra said in the proposed rule, the CPIO need not be present during hearing and instead, the public authority can depute a representative or another official. &ldquo;The result will be that lawyers who can represent the CPIOs at taxpayers&rsquo; cost or a junior official will be deputed by the public authority, contravening the Act,&rdquo; he added.
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
<br />
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
He said the Rs 50 postal fee and 500-word limit in RTI applications are not good.
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
&nbsp;
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
&ldquo;But it is clearly mentioned in the notification that one can&rsquo;t reject an RTI application for crossing the 500-word limit,&rdquo; he said.
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'Deccan Herald, 12 August, 2012, http://www.deccanherald.com/content/271217/activist-finds-holes-rti-rules.html',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'activist-finds-holes-in-rti-rules-sugandha-pathak-16574',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 16574,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 16446,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Activist finds holes in RTI rules-Sugandha Pathak',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Right to Information,rti',
	'metaDesc' => '
-Deccan Herald





Proposed amendment criticised for being harsh on applicants






A proposed amendment in the Right to Information Act may end up diluting the Act, according to an RTI activist.&nbsp;





The amendment will make it mandatory for an appellant to be present in...',
	'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-Deccan Herald</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Proposed amendment criticised for being harsh on applicants</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><br /></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>A proposed amendment in the Right to Information Act may end up diluting the Act, according to an RTI activist.&nbsp;</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The amendment will make it mandatory for an appellant to be present in person or send a representative during case hearing by the Centre of Information Centre (CIC).</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;The appellant may be present in person, through an authorised representative or through video conferencing at the time of hearing of the appeal by the CIC,&rdquo; states a notification on this amendment by the department of personnel and training (DOPT) on July 31.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;Where the CIC is satisfied with the existing circumstances due to which the appellant is unable to attend the hearing, then it may afford another opportunity of hearing before a final decision is taken,&rdquo; the notification stated.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, RTI activist Lokesh Batra, who has been following discussions on RTI amendments since 2010, said this notification has not been posted officially on DoPT&rsquo;s website. Batra said not giving an appellant the option to attend one&rsquo;s hearing &mdash; which was allowed earlier &mdash; will lead to people filing less number of RTI applications.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;Earlier, the appellate authority, usually a judge, would come to a decision after going through documents submitted by the appellant and then send a written reply,&rdquo; said Batra. Now, the amendment states that if the appellant cannot make it to the hearing of the case, then the person should send at least a representative.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;There is also no mention about audio conferencing (telephone call), which used to be allowed. How will it be possible for people living across the country or even abroad to appear for hearing?&rdquo; said Batra.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;The commissions are located in New Delhi and people from different parts of the country will have to come to the Capital to attend hearings, and that too at personal cost,&rdquo; he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Another amendment which Batra feels does not make sense is that a public authority may allow any representative or any related officer to present their side of the case.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Batra said this clause will violate the provisions of the RTI Act, Section 19(5), which states: &ldquo;In any appeal proceedings, the onus to prove that a denial of a request was justified shall be on the central public information officer (CPIO) or the state public information officer, as the case may be, who denied the request.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Batra said in the proposed rule, the CPIO need not be present during hearing and instead, the public authority can depute a representative or another official. &ldquo;The result will be that lawyers who can represent the CPIOs at taxpayers&rsquo; cost or a junior official will be deputed by the public authority, contravening the Act,&rdquo; he added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He said the Rs 50 postal fee and 500-word limit in RTI applications are not good.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;But it is clearly mentioned in the notification that one can&rsquo;t reject an RTI application for crossing the 500-word limit,&rdquo; he said.</div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 16446,
	'title' => 'Activist finds holes in RTI rules-Sugandha Pathak',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify">
-Deccan Herald
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
<br />
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
<em>Proposed amendment criticised for being harsh on applicants</em>
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
<em><br />
</em>
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
<em>A proposed amendment in the Right to Information Act may end up diluting the Act, according to an RTI activist.&nbsp;</em>
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
<br />
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
The amendment will make it mandatory for an appellant to be present in person or send a representative during case hearing by the Centre of Information Centre (CIC).
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
<br />
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
&ldquo;The appellant may be present in person, through an authorised representative or through video conferencing at the time of hearing of the appeal by the CIC,&rdquo; states a notification on this amendment by the department of personnel and training (DOPT) on July 31.
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
<br />
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
&ldquo;Where the CIC is satisfied with the existing circumstances due to which the appellant is unable to attend the hearing, then it may afford another opportunity of hearing before a final decision is taken,&rdquo; the notification stated.
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
<br />
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
However, RTI activist Lokesh Batra, who has been following discussions on RTI amendments since 2010, said this notification has not been posted officially on DoPT&rsquo;s website. Batra said not giving an appellant the option to attend one&rsquo;s hearing &mdash; which was allowed earlier &mdash; will lead to people filing less number of RTI applications.
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
<br />
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
&ldquo;Earlier, the appellate authority, usually a judge, would come to a decision after going through documents submitted by the appellant and then send a written reply,&rdquo; said Batra. Now, the amendment states that if the appellant cannot make it to the hearing of the case, then the person should send at least a representative.
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
<br />
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
&ldquo;There is also no mention about audio conferencing (telephone call), which used to be allowed. How will it be possible for people living across the country or even abroad to appear for hearing?&rdquo; said Batra.
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
<br />
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
&ldquo;The commissions are located in New Delhi and people from different parts of the country will have to come to the Capital to attend hearings, and that too at personal cost,&rdquo; he said.
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
<br />
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
Another amendment which Batra feels does not make sense is that a public authority may allow any representative or any related officer to present their side of the case.&nbsp;
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
<br />
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
Batra said this clause will violate the provisions of the RTI Act, Section 19(5), which states: &ldquo;In any appeal proceedings, the onus to prove that a denial of a request was justified shall be on the central public information officer (CPIO) or the state public information officer, as the case may be, who denied the request.&rdquo;
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
<br />
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
Batra said in the proposed rule, the CPIO need not be present during hearing and instead, the public authority can depute a representative or another official. &ldquo;The result will be that lawyers who can represent the CPIOs at taxpayers&rsquo; cost or a junior official will be deputed by the public authority, contravening the Act,&rdquo; he added.
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
<br />
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
He said the Rs 50 postal fee and 500-word limit in RTI applications are not good.
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
&nbsp;
</div>
<div style="text-align: justify">
&ldquo;But it is clearly mentioned in the notification that one can&rsquo;t reject an RTI application for crossing the 500-word limit,&rdquo; he said.
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'Deccan Herald, 12 August, 2012, http://www.deccanherald.com/content/271217/activist-finds-holes-rti-rules.html',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'activist-finds-holes-in-rti-rules-sugandha-pathak-16574',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 16574,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 16446
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Activist finds holes in RTI rules-Sugandha Pathak'
$metaKeywords = 'Right to Information,rti'
$metaDesc = '
-Deccan Herald





Proposed amendment criticised for being harsh on applicants






A proposed amendment in the Right to Information Act may end up diluting the Act, according to an RTI activist.&nbsp;





The amendment will make it mandatory for an appellant to be present in...'
$disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-Deccan Herald</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>Proposed amendment criticised for being harsh on applicants</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em><br /></em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>A proposed amendment in the Right to Information Act may end up diluting the Act, according to an RTI activist.&nbsp;</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The amendment will make it mandatory for an appellant to be present in person or send a representative during case hearing by the Centre of Information Centre (CIC).</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;The appellant may be present in person, through an authorised representative or through video conferencing at the time of hearing of the appeal by the CIC,&rdquo; states a notification on this amendment by the department of personnel and training (DOPT) on July 31.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;Where the CIC is satisfied with the existing circumstances due to which the appellant is unable to attend the hearing, then it may afford another opportunity of hearing before a final decision is taken,&rdquo; the notification stated.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, RTI activist Lokesh Batra, who has been following discussions on RTI amendments since 2010, said this notification has not been posted officially on DoPT&rsquo;s website. Batra said not giving an appellant the option to attend one&rsquo;s hearing &mdash; which was allowed earlier &mdash; will lead to people filing less number of RTI applications.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;Earlier, the appellate authority, usually a judge, would come to a decision after going through documents submitted by the appellant and then send a written reply,&rdquo; said Batra. Now, the amendment states that if the appellant cannot make it to the hearing of the case, then the person should send at least a representative.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;There is also no mention about audio conferencing (telephone call), which used to be allowed. How will it be possible for people living across the country or even abroad to appear for hearing?&rdquo; said Batra.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;The commissions are located in New Delhi and people from different parts of the country will have to come to the Capital to attend hearings, and that too at personal cost,&rdquo; he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Another amendment which Batra feels does not make sense is that a public authority may allow any representative or any related officer to present their side of the case.&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Batra said this clause will violate the provisions of the RTI Act, Section 19(5), which states: &ldquo;In any appeal proceedings, the onus to prove that a denial of a request was justified shall be on the central public information officer (CPIO) or the state public information officer, as the case may be, who denied the request.&rdquo;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Batra said in the proposed rule, the CPIO need not be present during hearing and instead, the public authority can depute a representative or another official. &ldquo;The result will be that lawyers who can represent the CPIOs at taxpayers&rsquo; cost or a junior official will be deputed by the public authority, contravening the Act,&rdquo; he added.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He said the Rs 50 postal fee and 500-word limit in RTI applications are not good.</div><div style="text-align: justify">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;But it is clearly mentioned in the notification that one can&rsquo;t reject an RTI application for crossing the 500-word limit,&rdquo; he said.</div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

Activist finds holes in RTI rules-Sugandha Pathak

-Deccan Herald Proposed amendment criticised for being harsh on applicants A proposed amendment in the Right to Information Act may end up diluting the Act, according to an RTI activist.  The amendment will make it mandatory for an appellant to be present in person or send a representative during case hearing by the Centre of Information Centre (CIC). “The appellant may be present in person, through an authorised representative or through video conferencing at the time of hearing of the appeal by the CIC,” states a notification on this amendment by the department of personnel and training (DOPT) on July 31. “Where the CIC is satisfied with the existing circumstances due to which the appellant is unable to attend the hearing, then it may afford another opportunity of hearing before a final decision is taken,” the notification stated. However, RTI activist Lokesh Batra, who has been following discussions on RTI amendments since 2010, said this notification has not been posted officially on DoPT’s website. Batra said not giving an appellant the option to attend one’s hearing — which was allowed earlier — will lead to people filing less number of RTI applications. “Earlier, the appellate authority, usually a judge, would come to a decision after going through documents submitted by the appellant and then send a written reply,” said Batra. Now, the amendment states that if the appellant cannot make it to the hearing of the case, then the person should send at least a representative. “There is also no mention about audio conferencing (telephone call), which used to be allowed. How will it be possible for people living across the country or even abroad to appear for hearing?” said Batra. “The commissions are located in New Delhi and people from different parts of the country will have to come to the Capital to attend hearings, and that too at personal cost,” he said. Another amendment which Batra feels does not make sense is that a public authority may allow any representative or any related officer to present their side of the case.  Batra said this clause will violate the provisions of the RTI Act, Section 19(5), which states: “In any appeal proceedings, the onus to prove that a denial of a request was justified shall be on the central public information officer (CPIO) or the state public information officer, as the case may be, who denied the request.” Batra said in the proposed rule, the CPIO need not be present during hearing and instead, the public authority can depute a representative or another official. “The result will be that lawyers who can represent the CPIOs at taxpayers’ cost or a junior official will be deputed by the public authority, contravening the Act,” he added. He said the Rs 50 postal fee and 500-word limit in RTI applications are not good.   “But it is clearly mentioned in the notification that one can’t reject an RTI application for crossing the 500-word limit,” he said.