Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/activists-lament-courts-going-soft-on-rti-offenders-4134/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/activists-lament-courts-going-soft-on-rti-offenders-4134/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/activists-lament-courts-going-soft-on-rti-offenders-4134/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/activists-lament-courts-going-soft-on-rti-offenders-4134/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6e66809c3b-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6e66809c3b-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f6e66809c3b-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6e66809c3b-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6e66809c3b-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6e66809c3b-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6e66809c3b-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f6e66809c3b-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f6e66809c3b-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 4044, 'title' => 'Activists lament courts going soft on RTI offenders', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><br /> </font> <div align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The trend of government officials approaching the High Court against the Central Information Commission's (CIC) decision imposing fines on PIOs for delay in information to applicants under the RTI Act has started a debate amongst the RTI activists. </font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Activists said very few information commissioners have levied monetary fine on the Public Information Officers (PIOs), who do not comply with the provisions of the Right to Information (RTI) Act.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">And now the decisions of those who impose fine are being challenged in the court.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Two recent instances saw the Delhi High Court reduce the penalty imposed on the PIOs for not providing information on time.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In case of Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) vs Atma Prakash Mehta case, justice S Muralidharan had reduced the penalty.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">He ordered for the penalty on the MCD official to be reduced from Rs 18,500 to Rs 7,000, to be recovered from him in two equal installments of Rs 3,500 per month in view of the &quot;facts and circumstances&quot; of the case.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Gaurang Kant, the lawyer who represented Mehta, said, &quot;The CIC had imposed the fine in excess by way of two orders against the same appeal.&quot;</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In the RA Haritash vs Anand Bhushan case, the Delhi High Court took it on record that the information was ultimately</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">provided on March 27, 2010, when the application under RTI was originally filed on November 4, 2009.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The PIO claimed he had joined on November 18, 2009, 14 days after the RTI application was filed.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The HC ordered reduction of the penalty from Rs 25,000 (to be recovered from the official's salary) to just Rs 2,500 (to be recovered from his salary in 10 installments).</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Vibhav Kumar, an activist-member of NGO Kabir, said, &quot;Overall it seems that the judiciary is working to weaken the RTI Act. Orders like this wherein penalty amount is reduced will encourage more PIOs to not give information on time.&quot;</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">However, RTI activist Lokesh Batra, points out another aspect.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&quot;Only if the Honourable High Court is convinced by the PIO that the delay was beyond his control for a certain period, then the Court is justified in reducing the penalty.&quot;</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&quot;However, even if the penalty has been reduced, the High Court has held the PIO guilty of delay and thus upheld the CIC decision.&quot;</font><br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindustan Times, 2 November, 2010, http://www.hindustantimes.com/Activists-lament-courts-going-soft-on-RTI-offenders/Article1-620907.aspx', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'activists-lament-courts-going-soft-on-rti-offenders-4134', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4134, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 4044, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Activists lament courts going soft on RTI offenders', 'metaKeywords' => 'Right to Information', 'metaDesc' => ' The trend of government officials approaching the High Court against the Central Information Commission's (CIC) decision imposing fines on PIOs for delay in information to applicants under the RTI Act has started a debate amongst the RTI activists. Activists said...', 'disp' => '<font ><br /></font><div align="justify"><font >The trend of government officials approaching the High Court against the Central Information Commission's (CIC) decision imposing fines on PIOs for delay in information to applicants under the RTI Act has started a debate amongst the RTI activists. </font><br /><br /><font >Activists said very few information commissioners have levied monetary fine on the Public Information Officers (PIOs), who do not comply with the provisions of the Right to Information (RTI) Act.</font><br /><br /><font >And now the decisions of those who impose fine are being challenged in the court.</font><br /><br /><font >Two recent instances saw the Delhi High Court reduce the penalty imposed on the PIOs for not providing information on time.</font><br /><br /><font >In case of Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) vs Atma Prakash Mehta case, justice S Muralidharan had reduced the penalty.</font><br /><br /><font >He ordered for the penalty on the MCD official to be reduced from Rs 18,500 to Rs 7,000, to be recovered from him in two equal installments of Rs 3,500 per month in view of the &quot;facts and circumstances&quot; of the case.</font><br /><br /><font >Gaurang Kant, the lawyer who represented Mehta, said, &quot;The CIC had imposed the fine in excess by way of two orders against the same appeal.&quot;</font><br /><br /><font >In the RA Haritash vs Anand Bhushan case, the Delhi High Court took it on record that the information was ultimately</font><br /><br /><font >provided on March 27, 2010, when the application under RTI was originally filed on November 4, 2009.</font><br /><br /><font >The PIO claimed he had joined on November 18, 2009, 14 days after the RTI application was filed.</font><br /><br /><font >The HC ordered reduction of the penalty from Rs 25,000 (to be recovered from the official's salary) to just Rs 2,500 (to be recovered from his salary in 10 installments).</font><br /><br /><font >Vibhav Kumar, an activist-member of NGO Kabir, said, &quot;Overall it seems that the judiciary is working to weaken the RTI Act. Orders like this wherein penalty amount is reduced will encourage more PIOs to not give information on time.&quot;</font><br /><br /><font >However, RTI activist Lokesh Batra, points out another aspect.</font><br /><br /><font >&quot;Only if the Honourable High Court is convinced by the PIO that the delay was beyond his control for a certain period, then the Court is justified in reducing the penalty.&quot;</font><br /><br /><font >&quot;However, even if the penalty has been reduced, the High Court has held the PIO guilty of delay and thus upheld the CIC decision.&quot;</font><br /><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 4044, 'title' => 'Activists lament courts going soft on RTI offenders', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><br /> </font> <div align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The trend of government officials approaching the High Court against the Central Information Commission's (CIC) decision imposing fines on PIOs for delay in information to applicants under the RTI Act has started a debate amongst the RTI activists. </font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Activists said very few information commissioners have levied monetary fine on the Public Information Officers (PIOs), who do not comply with the provisions of the Right to Information (RTI) Act.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">And now the decisions of those who impose fine are being challenged in the court.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Two recent instances saw the Delhi High Court reduce the penalty imposed on the PIOs for not providing information on time.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In case of Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) vs Atma Prakash Mehta case, justice S Muralidharan had reduced the penalty.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">He ordered for the penalty on the MCD official to be reduced from Rs 18,500 to Rs 7,000, to be recovered from him in two equal installments of Rs 3,500 per month in view of the &quot;facts and circumstances&quot; of the case.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Gaurang Kant, the lawyer who represented Mehta, said, &quot;The CIC had imposed the fine in excess by way of two orders against the same appeal.&quot;</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In the RA Haritash vs Anand Bhushan case, the Delhi High Court took it on record that the information was ultimately</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">provided on March 27, 2010, when the application under RTI was originally filed on November 4, 2009.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The PIO claimed he had joined on November 18, 2009, 14 days after the RTI application was filed.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The HC ordered reduction of the penalty from Rs 25,000 (to be recovered from the official's salary) to just Rs 2,500 (to be recovered from his salary in 10 installments).</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Vibhav Kumar, an activist-member of NGO Kabir, said, &quot;Overall it seems that the judiciary is working to weaken the RTI Act. Orders like this wherein penalty amount is reduced will encourage more PIOs to not give information on time.&quot;</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">However, RTI activist Lokesh Batra, points out another aspect.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&quot;Only if the Honourable High Court is convinced by the PIO that the delay was beyond his control for a certain period, then the Court is justified in reducing the penalty.&quot;</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&quot;However, even if the penalty has been reduced, the High Court has held the PIO guilty of delay and thus upheld the CIC decision.&quot;</font><br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindustan Times, 2 November, 2010, http://www.hindustantimes.com/Activists-lament-courts-going-soft-on-RTI-offenders/Article1-620907.aspx', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'activists-lament-courts-going-soft-on-rti-offenders-4134', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4134, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 4044 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Activists lament courts going soft on RTI offenders' $metaKeywords = 'Right to Information' $metaDesc = ' The trend of government officials approaching the High Court against the Central Information Commission's (CIC) decision imposing fines on PIOs for delay in information to applicants under the RTI Act has started a debate amongst the RTI activists. Activists said...' $disp = '<font ><br /></font><div align="justify"><font >The trend of government officials approaching the High Court against the Central Information Commission's (CIC) decision imposing fines on PIOs for delay in information to applicants under the RTI Act has started a debate amongst the RTI activists. </font><br /><br /><font >Activists said very few information commissioners have levied monetary fine on the Public Information Officers (PIOs), who do not comply with the provisions of the Right to Information (RTI) Act.</font><br /><br /><font >And now the decisions of those who impose fine are being challenged in the court.</font><br /><br /><font >Two recent instances saw the Delhi High Court reduce the penalty imposed on the PIOs for not providing information on time.</font><br /><br /><font >In case of Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) vs Atma Prakash Mehta case, justice S Muralidharan had reduced the penalty.</font><br /><br /><font >He ordered for the penalty on the MCD official to be reduced from Rs 18,500 to Rs 7,000, to be recovered from him in two equal installments of Rs 3,500 per month in view of the &quot;facts and circumstances&quot; of the case.</font><br /><br /><font >Gaurang Kant, the lawyer who represented Mehta, said, &quot;The CIC had imposed the fine in excess by way of two orders against the same appeal.&quot;</font><br /><br /><font >In the RA Haritash vs Anand Bhushan case, the Delhi High Court took it on record that the information was ultimately</font><br /><br /><font >provided on March 27, 2010, when the application under RTI was originally filed on November 4, 2009.</font><br /><br /><font >The PIO claimed he had joined on November 18, 2009, 14 days after the RTI application was filed.</font><br /><br /><font >The HC ordered reduction of the penalty from Rs 25,000 (to be recovered from the official's salary) to just Rs 2,500 (to be recovered from his salary in 10 installments).</font><br /><br /><font >Vibhav Kumar, an activist-member of NGO Kabir, said, &quot;Overall it seems that the judiciary is working to weaken the RTI Act. Orders like this wherein penalty amount is reduced will encourage more PIOs to not give information on time.&quot;</font><br /><br /><font >However, RTI activist Lokesh Batra, points out another aspect.</font><br /><br /><font >&quot;Only if the Honourable High Court is convinced by the PIO that the delay was beyond his control for a certain period, then the Court is justified in reducing the penalty.&quot;</font><br /><br /><font >&quot;However, even if the penalty has been reduced, the High Court has held the PIO guilty of delay and thus upheld the CIC decision.&quot;</font><br /><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/activists-lament-courts-going-soft-on-rti-offenders-4134.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Activists lament courts going soft on RTI offenders | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" The trend of government officials approaching the High Court against the Central Information Commission's (CIC) decision imposing fines on PIOs for delay in information to applicants under the RTI Act has started a debate amongst the RTI activists. Activists said..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Activists lament courts going soft on RTI offenders</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <font ><br /></font><div align="justify"><font >The trend of government officials approaching the High Court against the Central Information Commission's (CIC) decision imposing fines on PIOs for delay in information to applicants under the RTI Act has started a debate amongst the RTI activists. </font><br /><br /><font >Activists said very few information commissioners have levied monetary fine on the Public Information Officers (PIOs), who do not comply with the provisions of the Right to Information (RTI) Act.</font><br /><br /><font >And now the decisions of those who impose fine are being challenged in the court.</font><br /><br /><font >Two recent instances saw the Delhi High Court reduce the penalty imposed on the PIOs for not providing information on time.</font><br /><br /><font >In case of Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) vs Atma Prakash Mehta case, justice S Muralidharan had reduced the penalty.</font><br /><br /><font >He ordered for the penalty on the MCD official to be reduced from Rs 18,500 to Rs 7,000, to be recovered from him in two equal installments of Rs 3,500 per month in view of the "facts and circumstances" of the case.</font><br /><br /><font >Gaurang Kant, the lawyer who represented Mehta, said, "The CIC had imposed the fine in excess by way of two orders against the same appeal."</font><br /><br /><font >In the RA Haritash vs Anand Bhushan case, the Delhi High Court took it on record that the information was ultimately</font><br /><br /><font >provided on March 27, 2010, when the application under RTI was originally filed on November 4, 2009.</font><br /><br /><font >The PIO claimed he had joined on November 18, 2009, 14 days after the RTI application was filed.</font><br /><br /><font >The HC ordered reduction of the penalty from Rs 25,000 (to be recovered from the official's salary) to just Rs 2,500 (to be recovered from his salary in 10 installments).</font><br /><br /><font >Vibhav Kumar, an activist-member of NGO Kabir, said, "Overall it seems that the judiciary is working to weaken the RTI Act. Orders like this wherein penalty amount is reduced will encourage more PIOs to not give information on time."</font><br /><br /><font >However, RTI activist Lokesh Batra, points out another aspect.</font><br /><br /><font >"Only if the Honourable High Court is convinced by the PIO that the delay was beyond his control for a certain period, then the Court is justified in reducing the penalty."</font><br /><br /><font >"However, even if the penalty has been reduced, the High Court has held the PIO guilty of delay and thus upheld the CIC decision."</font><br /><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6e66809c3b-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6e66809c3b-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f6e66809c3b-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6e66809c3b-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6e66809c3b-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6e66809c3b-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6e66809c3b-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f6e66809c3b-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f6e66809c3b-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 4044, 'title' => 'Activists lament courts going soft on RTI offenders', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><br /> </font> <div align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The trend of government officials approaching the High Court against the Central Information Commission's (CIC) decision imposing fines on PIOs for delay in information to applicants under the RTI Act has started a debate amongst the RTI activists. </font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Activists said very few information commissioners have levied monetary fine on the Public Information Officers (PIOs), who do not comply with the provisions of the Right to Information (RTI) Act.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">And now the decisions of those who impose fine are being challenged in the court.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Two recent instances saw the Delhi High Court reduce the penalty imposed on the PIOs for not providing information on time.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In case of Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) vs Atma Prakash Mehta case, justice S Muralidharan had reduced the penalty.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">He ordered for the penalty on the MCD official to be reduced from Rs 18,500 to Rs 7,000, to be recovered from him in two equal installments of Rs 3,500 per month in view of the &quot;facts and circumstances&quot; of the case.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Gaurang Kant, the lawyer who represented Mehta, said, &quot;The CIC had imposed the fine in excess by way of two orders against the same appeal.&quot;</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In the RA Haritash vs Anand Bhushan case, the Delhi High Court took it on record that the information was ultimately</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">provided on March 27, 2010, when the application under RTI was originally filed on November 4, 2009.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The PIO claimed he had joined on November 18, 2009, 14 days after the RTI application was filed.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The HC ordered reduction of the penalty from Rs 25,000 (to be recovered from the official's salary) to just Rs 2,500 (to be recovered from his salary in 10 installments).</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Vibhav Kumar, an activist-member of NGO Kabir, said, &quot;Overall it seems that the judiciary is working to weaken the RTI Act. Orders like this wherein penalty amount is reduced will encourage more PIOs to not give information on time.&quot;</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">However, RTI activist Lokesh Batra, points out another aspect.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&quot;Only if the Honourable High Court is convinced by the PIO that the delay was beyond his control for a certain period, then the Court is justified in reducing the penalty.&quot;</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&quot;However, even if the penalty has been reduced, the High Court has held the PIO guilty of delay and thus upheld the CIC decision.&quot;</font><br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindustan Times, 2 November, 2010, http://www.hindustantimes.com/Activists-lament-courts-going-soft-on-RTI-offenders/Article1-620907.aspx', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'activists-lament-courts-going-soft-on-rti-offenders-4134', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4134, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 4044, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Activists lament courts going soft on RTI offenders', 'metaKeywords' => 'Right to Information', 'metaDesc' => ' The trend of government officials approaching the High Court against the Central Information Commission's (CIC) decision imposing fines on PIOs for delay in information to applicants under the RTI Act has started a debate amongst the RTI activists. Activists said...', 'disp' => '<font ><br /></font><div align="justify"><font >The trend of government officials approaching the High Court against the Central Information Commission's (CIC) decision imposing fines on PIOs for delay in information to applicants under the RTI Act has started a debate amongst the RTI activists. </font><br /><br /><font >Activists said very few information commissioners have levied monetary fine on the Public Information Officers (PIOs), who do not comply with the provisions of the Right to Information (RTI) Act.</font><br /><br /><font >And now the decisions of those who impose fine are being challenged in the court.</font><br /><br /><font >Two recent instances saw the Delhi High Court reduce the penalty imposed on the PIOs for not providing information on time.</font><br /><br /><font >In case of Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) vs Atma Prakash Mehta case, justice S Muralidharan had reduced the penalty.</font><br /><br /><font >He ordered for the penalty on the MCD official to be reduced from Rs 18,500 to Rs 7,000, to be recovered from him in two equal installments of Rs 3,500 per month in view of the &quot;facts and circumstances&quot; of the case.</font><br /><br /><font >Gaurang Kant, the lawyer who represented Mehta, said, &quot;The CIC had imposed the fine in excess by way of two orders against the same appeal.&quot;</font><br /><br /><font >In the RA Haritash vs Anand Bhushan case, the Delhi High Court took it on record that the information was ultimately</font><br /><br /><font >provided on March 27, 2010, when the application under RTI was originally filed on November 4, 2009.</font><br /><br /><font >The PIO claimed he had joined on November 18, 2009, 14 days after the RTI application was filed.</font><br /><br /><font >The HC ordered reduction of the penalty from Rs 25,000 (to be recovered from the official's salary) to just Rs 2,500 (to be recovered from his salary in 10 installments).</font><br /><br /><font >Vibhav Kumar, an activist-member of NGO Kabir, said, &quot;Overall it seems that the judiciary is working to weaken the RTI Act. Orders like this wherein penalty amount is reduced will encourage more PIOs to not give information on time.&quot;</font><br /><br /><font >However, RTI activist Lokesh Batra, points out another aspect.</font><br /><br /><font >&quot;Only if the Honourable High Court is convinced by the PIO that the delay was beyond his control for a certain period, then the Court is justified in reducing the penalty.&quot;</font><br /><br /><font >&quot;However, even if the penalty has been reduced, the High Court has held the PIO guilty of delay and thus upheld the CIC decision.&quot;</font><br /><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 4044, 'title' => 'Activists lament courts going soft on RTI offenders', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><br /> </font> <div align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The trend of government officials approaching the High Court against the Central Information Commission's (CIC) decision imposing fines on PIOs for delay in information to applicants under the RTI Act has started a debate amongst the RTI activists. </font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Activists said very few information commissioners have levied monetary fine on the Public Information Officers (PIOs), who do not comply with the provisions of the Right to Information (RTI) Act.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">And now the decisions of those who impose fine are being challenged in the court.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Two recent instances saw the Delhi High Court reduce the penalty imposed on the PIOs for not providing information on time.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In case of Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) vs Atma Prakash Mehta case, justice S Muralidharan had reduced the penalty.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">He ordered for the penalty on the MCD official to be reduced from Rs 18,500 to Rs 7,000, to be recovered from him in two equal installments of Rs 3,500 per month in view of the &quot;facts and circumstances&quot; of the case.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Gaurang Kant, the lawyer who represented Mehta, said, &quot;The CIC had imposed the fine in excess by way of two orders against the same appeal.&quot;</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In the RA Haritash vs Anand Bhushan case, the Delhi High Court took it on record that the information was ultimately</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">provided on March 27, 2010, when the application under RTI was originally filed on November 4, 2009.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The PIO claimed he had joined on November 18, 2009, 14 days after the RTI application was filed.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The HC ordered reduction of the penalty from Rs 25,000 (to be recovered from the official's salary) to just Rs 2,500 (to be recovered from his salary in 10 installments).</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Vibhav Kumar, an activist-member of NGO Kabir, said, &quot;Overall it seems that the judiciary is working to weaken the RTI Act. Orders like this wherein penalty amount is reduced will encourage more PIOs to not give information on time.&quot;</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">However, RTI activist Lokesh Batra, points out another aspect.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&quot;Only if the Honourable High Court is convinced by the PIO that the delay was beyond his control for a certain period, then the Court is justified in reducing the penalty.&quot;</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&quot;However, even if the penalty has been reduced, the High Court has held the PIO guilty of delay and thus upheld the CIC decision.&quot;</font><br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindustan Times, 2 November, 2010, http://www.hindustantimes.com/Activists-lament-courts-going-soft-on-RTI-offenders/Article1-620907.aspx', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'activists-lament-courts-going-soft-on-rti-offenders-4134', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4134, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 4044 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Activists lament courts going soft on RTI offenders' $metaKeywords = 'Right to Information' $metaDesc = ' The trend of government officials approaching the High Court against the Central Information Commission's (CIC) decision imposing fines on PIOs for delay in information to applicants under the RTI Act has started a debate amongst the RTI activists. Activists said...' $disp = '<font ><br /></font><div align="justify"><font >The trend of government officials approaching the High Court against the Central Information Commission's (CIC) decision imposing fines on PIOs for delay in information to applicants under the RTI Act has started a debate amongst the RTI activists. </font><br /><br /><font >Activists said very few information commissioners have levied monetary fine on the Public Information Officers (PIOs), who do not comply with the provisions of the Right to Information (RTI) Act.</font><br /><br /><font >And now the decisions of those who impose fine are being challenged in the court.</font><br /><br /><font >Two recent instances saw the Delhi High Court reduce the penalty imposed on the PIOs for not providing information on time.</font><br /><br /><font >In case of Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) vs Atma Prakash Mehta case, justice S Muralidharan had reduced the penalty.</font><br /><br /><font >He ordered for the penalty on the MCD official to be reduced from Rs 18,500 to Rs 7,000, to be recovered from him in two equal installments of Rs 3,500 per month in view of the &quot;facts and circumstances&quot; of the case.</font><br /><br /><font >Gaurang Kant, the lawyer who represented Mehta, said, &quot;The CIC had imposed the fine in excess by way of two orders against the same appeal.&quot;</font><br /><br /><font >In the RA Haritash vs Anand Bhushan case, the Delhi High Court took it on record that the information was ultimately</font><br /><br /><font >provided on March 27, 2010, when the application under RTI was originally filed on November 4, 2009.</font><br /><br /><font >The PIO claimed he had joined on November 18, 2009, 14 days after the RTI application was filed.</font><br /><br /><font >The HC ordered reduction of the penalty from Rs 25,000 (to be recovered from the official's salary) to just Rs 2,500 (to be recovered from his salary in 10 installments).</font><br /><br /><font >Vibhav Kumar, an activist-member of NGO Kabir, said, &quot;Overall it seems that the judiciary is working to weaken the RTI Act. Orders like this wherein penalty amount is reduced will encourage more PIOs to not give information on time.&quot;</font><br /><br /><font >However, RTI activist Lokesh Batra, points out another aspect.</font><br /><br /><font >&quot;Only if the Honourable High Court is convinced by the PIO that the delay was beyond his control for a certain period, then the Court is justified in reducing the penalty.&quot;</font><br /><br /><font >&quot;However, even if the penalty has been reduced, the High Court has held the PIO guilty of delay and thus upheld the CIC decision.&quot;</font><br /><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/activists-lament-courts-going-soft-on-rti-offenders-4134.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Activists lament courts going soft on RTI offenders | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" The trend of government officials approaching the High Court against the Central Information Commission's (CIC) decision imposing fines on PIOs for delay in information to applicants under the RTI Act has started a debate amongst the RTI activists. Activists said..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Activists lament courts going soft on RTI offenders</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <font ><br /></font><div align="justify"><font >The trend of government officials approaching the High Court against the Central Information Commission's (CIC) decision imposing fines on PIOs for delay in information to applicants under the RTI Act has started a debate amongst the RTI activists. </font><br /><br /><font >Activists said very few information commissioners have levied monetary fine on the Public Information Officers (PIOs), who do not comply with the provisions of the Right to Information (RTI) Act.</font><br /><br /><font >And now the decisions of those who impose fine are being challenged in the court.</font><br /><br /><font >Two recent instances saw the Delhi High Court reduce the penalty imposed on the PIOs for not providing information on time.</font><br /><br /><font >In case of Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) vs Atma Prakash Mehta case, justice S Muralidharan had reduced the penalty.</font><br /><br /><font >He ordered for the penalty on the MCD official to be reduced from Rs 18,500 to Rs 7,000, to be recovered from him in two equal installments of Rs 3,500 per month in view of the "facts and circumstances" of the case.</font><br /><br /><font >Gaurang Kant, the lawyer who represented Mehta, said, "The CIC had imposed the fine in excess by way of two orders against the same appeal."</font><br /><br /><font >In the RA Haritash vs Anand Bhushan case, the Delhi High Court took it on record that the information was ultimately</font><br /><br /><font >provided on March 27, 2010, when the application under RTI was originally filed on November 4, 2009.</font><br /><br /><font >The PIO claimed he had joined on November 18, 2009, 14 days after the RTI application was filed.</font><br /><br /><font >The HC ordered reduction of the penalty from Rs 25,000 (to be recovered from the official's salary) to just Rs 2,500 (to be recovered from his salary in 10 installments).</font><br /><br /><font >Vibhav Kumar, an activist-member of NGO Kabir, said, "Overall it seems that the judiciary is working to weaken the RTI Act. Orders like this wherein penalty amount is reduced will encourage more PIOs to not give information on time."</font><br /><br /><font >However, RTI activist Lokesh Batra, points out another aspect.</font><br /><br /><font >"Only if the Honourable High Court is convinced by the PIO that the delay was beyond his control for a certain period, then the Court is justified in reducing the penalty."</font><br /><br /><font >"However, even if the penalty has been reduced, the High Court has held the PIO guilty of delay and thus upheld the CIC decision."</font><br /><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6e66809c3b-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6e66809c3b-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f6e66809c3b-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6e66809c3b-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6e66809c3b-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6e66809c3b-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f6e66809c3b-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f6e66809c3b-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f6e66809c3b-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 4044, 'title' => 'Activists lament courts going soft on RTI offenders', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><br /> </font> <div align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The trend of government officials approaching the High Court against the Central Information Commission's (CIC) decision imposing fines on PIOs for delay in information to applicants under the RTI Act has started a debate amongst the RTI activists. </font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Activists said very few information commissioners have levied monetary fine on the Public Information Officers (PIOs), who do not comply with the provisions of the Right to Information (RTI) Act.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">And now the decisions of those who impose fine are being challenged in the court.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Two recent instances saw the Delhi High Court reduce the penalty imposed on the PIOs for not providing information on time.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In case of Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) vs Atma Prakash Mehta case, justice S Muralidharan had reduced the penalty.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">He ordered for the penalty on the MCD official to be reduced from Rs 18,500 to Rs 7,000, to be recovered from him in two equal installments of Rs 3,500 per month in view of the &quot;facts and circumstances&quot; of the case.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Gaurang Kant, the lawyer who represented Mehta, said, &quot;The CIC had imposed the fine in excess by way of two orders against the same appeal.&quot;</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In the RA Haritash vs Anand Bhushan case, the Delhi High Court took it on record that the information was ultimately</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">provided on March 27, 2010, when the application under RTI was originally filed on November 4, 2009.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The PIO claimed he had joined on November 18, 2009, 14 days after the RTI application was filed.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The HC ordered reduction of the penalty from Rs 25,000 (to be recovered from the official's salary) to just Rs 2,500 (to be recovered from his salary in 10 installments).</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Vibhav Kumar, an activist-member of NGO Kabir, said, &quot;Overall it seems that the judiciary is working to weaken the RTI Act. Orders like this wherein penalty amount is reduced will encourage more PIOs to not give information on time.&quot;</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">However, RTI activist Lokesh Batra, points out another aspect.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&quot;Only if the Honourable High Court is convinced by the PIO that the delay was beyond his control for a certain period, then the Court is justified in reducing the penalty.&quot;</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&quot;However, even if the penalty has been reduced, the High Court has held the PIO guilty of delay and thus upheld the CIC decision.&quot;</font><br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindustan Times, 2 November, 2010, http://www.hindustantimes.com/Activists-lament-courts-going-soft-on-RTI-offenders/Article1-620907.aspx', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'activists-lament-courts-going-soft-on-rti-offenders-4134', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4134, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 4044, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Activists lament courts going soft on RTI offenders', 'metaKeywords' => 'Right to Information', 'metaDesc' => ' The trend of government officials approaching the High Court against the Central Information Commission's (CIC) decision imposing fines on PIOs for delay in information to applicants under the RTI Act has started a debate amongst the RTI activists. Activists said...', 'disp' => '<font ><br /></font><div align="justify"><font >The trend of government officials approaching the High Court against the Central Information Commission's (CIC) decision imposing fines on PIOs for delay in information to applicants under the RTI Act has started a debate amongst the RTI activists. </font><br /><br /><font >Activists said very few information commissioners have levied monetary fine on the Public Information Officers (PIOs), who do not comply with the provisions of the Right to Information (RTI) Act.</font><br /><br /><font >And now the decisions of those who impose fine are being challenged in the court.</font><br /><br /><font >Two recent instances saw the Delhi High Court reduce the penalty imposed on the PIOs for not providing information on time.</font><br /><br /><font >In case of Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) vs Atma Prakash Mehta case, justice S Muralidharan had reduced the penalty.</font><br /><br /><font >He ordered for the penalty on the MCD official to be reduced from Rs 18,500 to Rs 7,000, to be recovered from him in two equal installments of Rs 3,500 per month in view of the &quot;facts and circumstances&quot; of the case.</font><br /><br /><font >Gaurang Kant, the lawyer who represented Mehta, said, &quot;The CIC had imposed the fine in excess by way of two orders against the same appeal.&quot;</font><br /><br /><font >In the RA Haritash vs Anand Bhushan case, the Delhi High Court took it on record that the information was ultimately</font><br /><br /><font >provided on March 27, 2010, when the application under RTI was originally filed on November 4, 2009.</font><br /><br /><font >The PIO claimed he had joined on November 18, 2009, 14 days after the RTI application was filed.</font><br /><br /><font >The HC ordered reduction of the penalty from Rs 25,000 (to be recovered from the official's salary) to just Rs 2,500 (to be recovered from his salary in 10 installments).</font><br /><br /><font >Vibhav Kumar, an activist-member of NGO Kabir, said, &quot;Overall it seems that the judiciary is working to weaken the RTI Act. Orders like this wherein penalty amount is reduced will encourage more PIOs to not give information on time.&quot;</font><br /><br /><font >However, RTI activist Lokesh Batra, points out another aspect.</font><br /><br /><font >&quot;Only if the Honourable High Court is convinced by the PIO that the delay was beyond his control for a certain period, then the Court is justified in reducing the penalty.&quot;</font><br /><br /><font >&quot;However, even if the penalty has been reduced, the High Court has held the PIO guilty of delay and thus upheld the CIC decision.&quot;</font><br /><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 4044, 'title' => 'Activists lament courts going soft on RTI offenders', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><br /> </font> <div align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The trend of government officials approaching the High Court against the Central Information Commission's (CIC) decision imposing fines on PIOs for delay in information to applicants under the RTI Act has started a debate amongst the RTI activists. </font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Activists said very few information commissioners have levied monetary fine on the Public Information Officers (PIOs), who do not comply with the provisions of the Right to Information (RTI) Act.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">And now the decisions of those who impose fine are being challenged in the court.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Two recent instances saw the Delhi High Court reduce the penalty imposed on the PIOs for not providing information on time.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In case of Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) vs Atma Prakash Mehta case, justice S Muralidharan had reduced the penalty.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">He ordered for the penalty on the MCD official to be reduced from Rs 18,500 to Rs 7,000, to be recovered from him in two equal installments of Rs 3,500 per month in view of the &quot;facts and circumstances&quot; of the case.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Gaurang Kant, the lawyer who represented Mehta, said, &quot;The CIC had imposed the fine in excess by way of two orders against the same appeal.&quot;</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In the RA Haritash vs Anand Bhushan case, the Delhi High Court took it on record that the information was ultimately</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">provided on March 27, 2010, when the application under RTI was originally filed on November 4, 2009.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The PIO claimed he had joined on November 18, 2009, 14 days after the RTI application was filed.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The HC ordered reduction of the penalty from Rs 25,000 (to be recovered from the official's salary) to just Rs 2,500 (to be recovered from his salary in 10 installments).</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Vibhav Kumar, an activist-member of NGO Kabir, said, &quot;Overall it seems that the judiciary is working to weaken the RTI Act. Orders like this wherein penalty amount is reduced will encourage more PIOs to not give information on time.&quot;</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">However, RTI activist Lokesh Batra, points out another aspect.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&quot;Only if the Honourable High Court is convinced by the PIO that the delay was beyond his control for a certain period, then the Court is justified in reducing the penalty.&quot;</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&quot;However, even if the penalty has been reduced, the High Court has held the PIO guilty of delay and thus upheld the CIC decision.&quot;</font><br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindustan Times, 2 November, 2010, http://www.hindustantimes.com/Activists-lament-courts-going-soft-on-RTI-offenders/Article1-620907.aspx', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'activists-lament-courts-going-soft-on-rti-offenders-4134', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4134, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 4044 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Activists lament courts going soft on RTI offenders' $metaKeywords = 'Right to Information' $metaDesc = ' The trend of government officials approaching the High Court against the Central Information Commission's (CIC) decision imposing fines on PIOs for delay in information to applicants under the RTI Act has started a debate amongst the RTI activists. Activists said...' $disp = '<font ><br /></font><div align="justify"><font >The trend of government officials approaching the High Court against the Central Information Commission's (CIC) decision imposing fines on PIOs for delay in information to applicants under the RTI Act has started a debate amongst the RTI activists. </font><br /><br /><font >Activists said very few information commissioners have levied monetary fine on the Public Information Officers (PIOs), who do not comply with the provisions of the Right to Information (RTI) Act.</font><br /><br /><font >And now the decisions of those who impose fine are being challenged in the court.</font><br /><br /><font >Two recent instances saw the Delhi High Court reduce the penalty imposed on the PIOs for not providing information on time.</font><br /><br /><font >In case of Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) vs Atma Prakash Mehta case, justice S Muralidharan had reduced the penalty.</font><br /><br /><font >He ordered for the penalty on the MCD official to be reduced from Rs 18,500 to Rs 7,000, to be recovered from him in two equal installments of Rs 3,500 per month in view of the &quot;facts and circumstances&quot; of the case.</font><br /><br /><font >Gaurang Kant, the lawyer who represented Mehta, said, &quot;The CIC had imposed the fine in excess by way of two orders against the same appeal.&quot;</font><br /><br /><font >In the RA Haritash vs Anand Bhushan case, the Delhi High Court took it on record that the information was ultimately</font><br /><br /><font >provided on March 27, 2010, when the application under RTI was originally filed on November 4, 2009.</font><br /><br /><font >The PIO claimed he had joined on November 18, 2009, 14 days after the RTI application was filed.</font><br /><br /><font >The HC ordered reduction of the penalty from Rs 25,000 (to be recovered from the official's salary) to just Rs 2,500 (to be recovered from his salary in 10 installments).</font><br /><br /><font >Vibhav Kumar, an activist-member of NGO Kabir, said, &quot;Overall it seems that the judiciary is working to weaken the RTI Act. Orders like this wherein penalty amount is reduced will encourage more PIOs to not give information on time.&quot;</font><br /><br /><font >However, RTI activist Lokesh Batra, points out another aspect.</font><br /><br /><font >&quot;Only if the Honourable High Court is convinced by the PIO that the delay was beyond his control for a certain period, then the Court is justified in reducing the penalty.&quot;</font><br /><br /><font >&quot;However, even if the penalty has been reduced, the High Court has held the PIO guilty of delay and thus upheld the CIC decision.&quot;</font><br /><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/activists-lament-courts-going-soft-on-rti-offenders-4134.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Activists lament courts going soft on RTI offenders | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" The trend of government officials approaching the High Court against the Central Information Commission's (CIC) decision imposing fines on PIOs for delay in information to applicants under the RTI Act has started a debate amongst the RTI activists. Activists said..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Activists lament courts going soft on RTI offenders</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <font ><br /></font><div align="justify"><font >The trend of government officials approaching the High Court against the Central Information Commission's (CIC) decision imposing fines on PIOs for delay in information to applicants under the RTI Act has started a debate amongst the RTI activists. </font><br /><br /><font >Activists said very few information commissioners have levied monetary fine on the Public Information Officers (PIOs), who do not comply with the provisions of the Right to Information (RTI) Act.</font><br /><br /><font >And now the decisions of those who impose fine are being challenged in the court.</font><br /><br /><font >Two recent instances saw the Delhi High Court reduce the penalty imposed on the PIOs for not providing information on time.</font><br /><br /><font >In case of Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) vs Atma Prakash Mehta case, justice S Muralidharan had reduced the penalty.</font><br /><br /><font >He ordered for the penalty on the MCD official to be reduced from Rs 18,500 to Rs 7,000, to be recovered from him in two equal installments of Rs 3,500 per month in view of the "facts and circumstances" of the case.</font><br /><br /><font >Gaurang Kant, the lawyer who represented Mehta, said, "The CIC had imposed the fine in excess by way of two orders against the same appeal."</font><br /><br /><font >In the RA Haritash vs Anand Bhushan case, the Delhi High Court took it on record that the information was ultimately</font><br /><br /><font >provided on March 27, 2010, when the application under RTI was originally filed on November 4, 2009.</font><br /><br /><font >The PIO claimed he had joined on November 18, 2009, 14 days after the RTI application was filed.</font><br /><br /><font >The HC ordered reduction of the penalty from Rs 25,000 (to be recovered from the official's salary) to just Rs 2,500 (to be recovered from his salary in 10 installments).</font><br /><br /><font >Vibhav Kumar, an activist-member of NGO Kabir, said, "Overall it seems that the judiciary is working to weaken the RTI Act. Orders like this wherein penalty amount is reduced will encourage more PIOs to not give information on time."</font><br /><br /><font >However, RTI activist Lokesh Batra, points out another aspect.</font><br /><br /><font >"Only if the Honourable High Court is convinced by the PIO that the delay was beyond his control for a certain period, then the Court is justified in reducing the penalty."</font><br /><br /><font >"However, even if the penalty has been reduced, the High Court has held the PIO guilty of delay and thus upheld the CIC decision."</font><br /><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 4044, 'title' => 'Activists lament courts going soft on RTI offenders', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><br /> </font> <div align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The trend of government officials approaching the High Court against the Central Information Commission's (CIC) decision imposing fines on PIOs for delay in information to applicants under the RTI Act has started a debate amongst the RTI activists. </font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Activists said very few information commissioners have levied monetary fine on the Public Information Officers (PIOs), who do not comply with the provisions of the Right to Information (RTI) Act.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">And now the decisions of those who impose fine are being challenged in the court.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Two recent instances saw the Delhi High Court reduce the penalty imposed on the PIOs for not providing information on time.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In case of Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) vs Atma Prakash Mehta case, justice S Muralidharan had reduced the penalty.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">He ordered for the penalty on the MCD official to be reduced from Rs 18,500 to Rs 7,000, to be recovered from him in two equal installments of Rs 3,500 per month in view of the "facts and circumstances" of the case.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Gaurang Kant, the lawyer who represented Mehta, said, "The CIC had imposed the fine in excess by way of two orders against the same appeal."</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In the RA Haritash vs Anand Bhushan case, the Delhi High Court took it on record that the information was ultimately</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">provided on March 27, 2010, when the application under RTI was originally filed on November 4, 2009.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The PIO claimed he had joined on November 18, 2009, 14 days after the RTI application was filed.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The HC ordered reduction of the penalty from Rs 25,000 (to be recovered from the official's salary) to just Rs 2,500 (to be recovered from his salary in 10 installments).</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Vibhav Kumar, an activist-member of NGO Kabir, said, "Overall it seems that the judiciary is working to weaken the RTI Act. Orders like this wherein penalty amount is reduced will encourage more PIOs to not give information on time."</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">However, RTI activist Lokesh Batra, points out another aspect.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">"Only if the Honourable High Court is convinced by the PIO that the delay was beyond his control for a certain period, then the Court is justified in reducing the penalty."</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">"However, even if the penalty has been reduced, the High Court has held the PIO guilty of delay and thus upheld the CIC decision."</font><br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindustan Times, 2 November, 2010, http://www.hindustantimes.com/Activists-lament-courts-going-soft-on-RTI-offenders/Article1-620907.aspx', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'activists-lament-courts-going-soft-on-rti-offenders-4134', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4134, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 4044, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Activists lament courts going soft on RTI offenders', 'metaKeywords' => 'Right to Information', 'metaDesc' => ' The trend of government officials approaching the High Court against the Central Information Commission's (CIC) decision imposing fines on PIOs for delay in information to applicants under the RTI Act has started a debate amongst the RTI activists. Activists said...', 'disp' => '<font ><br /></font><div align="justify"><font >The trend of government officials approaching the High Court against the Central Information Commission's (CIC) decision imposing fines on PIOs for delay in information to applicants under the RTI Act has started a debate amongst the RTI activists. </font><br /><br /><font >Activists said very few information commissioners have levied monetary fine on the Public Information Officers (PIOs), who do not comply with the provisions of the Right to Information (RTI) Act.</font><br /><br /><font >And now the decisions of those who impose fine are being challenged in the court.</font><br /><br /><font >Two recent instances saw the Delhi High Court reduce the penalty imposed on the PIOs for not providing information on time.</font><br /><br /><font >In case of Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) vs Atma Prakash Mehta case, justice S Muralidharan had reduced the penalty.</font><br /><br /><font >He ordered for the penalty on the MCD official to be reduced from Rs 18,500 to Rs 7,000, to be recovered from him in two equal installments of Rs 3,500 per month in view of the "facts and circumstances" of the case.</font><br /><br /><font >Gaurang Kant, the lawyer who represented Mehta, said, "The CIC had imposed the fine in excess by way of two orders against the same appeal."</font><br /><br /><font >In the RA Haritash vs Anand Bhushan case, the Delhi High Court took it on record that the information was ultimately</font><br /><br /><font >provided on March 27, 2010, when the application under RTI was originally filed on November 4, 2009.</font><br /><br /><font >The PIO claimed he had joined on November 18, 2009, 14 days after the RTI application was filed.</font><br /><br /><font >The HC ordered reduction of the penalty from Rs 25,000 (to be recovered from the official's salary) to just Rs 2,500 (to be recovered from his salary in 10 installments).</font><br /><br /><font >Vibhav Kumar, an activist-member of NGO Kabir, said, "Overall it seems that the judiciary is working to weaken the RTI Act. Orders like this wherein penalty amount is reduced will encourage more PIOs to not give information on time."</font><br /><br /><font >However, RTI activist Lokesh Batra, points out another aspect.</font><br /><br /><font >"Only if the Honourable High Court is convinced by the PIO that the delay was beyond his control for a certain period, then the Court is justified in reducing the penalty."</font><br /><br /><font >"However, even if the penalty has been reduced, the High Court has held the PIO guilty of delay and thus upheld the CIC decision."</font><br /><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 4044, 'title' => 'Activists lament courts going soft on RTI offenders', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><br /> </font> <div align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The trend of government officials approaching the High Court against the Central Information Commission's (CIC) decision imposing fines on PIOs for delay in information to applicants under the RTI Act has started a debate amongst the RTI activists. </font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Activists said very few information commissioners have levied monetary fine on the Public Information Officers (PIOs), who do not comply with the provisions of the Right to Information (RTI) Act.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">And now the decisions of those who impose fine are being challenged in the court.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Two recent instances saw the Delhi High Court reduce the penalty imposed on the PIOs for not providing information on time.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In case of Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) vs Atma Prakash Mehta case, justice S Muralidharan had reduced the penalty.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">He ordered for the penalty on the MCD official to be reduced from Rs 18,500 to Rs 7,000, to be recovered from him in two equal installments of Rs 3,500 per month in view of the "facts and circumstances" of the case.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Gaurang Kant, the lawyer who represented Mehta, said, "The CIC had imposed the fine in excess by way of two orders against the same appeal."</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In the RA Haritash vs Anand Bhushan case, the Delhi High Court took it on record that the information was ultimately</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">provided on March 27, 2010, when the application under RTI was originally filed on November 4, 2009.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The PIO claimed he had joined on November 18, 2009, 14 days after the RTI application was filed.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The HC ordered reduction of the penalty from Rs 25,000 (to be recovered from the official's salary) to just Rs 2,500 (to be recovered from his salary in 10 installments).</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Vibhav Kumar, an activist-member of NGO Kabir, said, "Overall it seems that the judiciary is working to weaken the RTI Act. Orders like this wherein penalty amount is reduced will encourage more PIOs to not give information on time."</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">However, RTI activist Lokesh Batra, points out another aspect.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">"Only if the Honourable High Court is convinced by the PIO that the delay was beyond his control for a certain period, then the Court is justified in reducing the penalty."</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">"However, even if the penalty has been reduced, the High Court has held the PIO guilty of delay and thus upheld the CIC decision."</font><br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindustan Times, 2 November, 2010, http://www.hindustantimes.com/Activists-lament-courts-going-soft-on-RTI-offenders/Article1-620907.aspx', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'activists-lament-courts-going-soft-on-rti-offenders-4134', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4134, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 4044 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Activists lament courts going soft on RTI offenders' $metaKeywords = 'Right to Information' $metaDesc = ' The trend of government officials approaching the High Court against the Central Information Commission's (CIC) decision imposing fines on PIOs for delay in information to applicants under the RTI Act has started a debate amongst the RTI activists. Activists said...' $disp = '<font ><br /></font><div align="justify"><font >The trend of government officials approaching the High Court against the Central Information Commission's (CIC) decision imposing fines on PIOs for delay in information to applicants under the RTI Act has started a debate amongst the RTI activists. </font><br /><br /><font >Activists said very few information commissioners have levied monetary fine on the Public Information Officers (PIOs), who do not comply with the provisions of the Right to Information (RTI) Act.</font><br /><br /><font >And now the decisions of those who impose fine are being challenged in the court.</font><br /><br /><font >Two recent instances saw the Delhi High Court reduce the penalty imposed on the PIOs for not providing information on time.</font><br /><br /><font >In case of Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) vs Atma Prakash Mehta case, justice S Muralidharan had reduced the penalty.</font><br /><br /><font >He ordered for the penalty on the MCD official to be reduced from Rs 18,500 to Rs 7,000, to be recovered from him in two equal installments of Rs 3,500 per month in view of the "facts and circumstances" of the case.</font><br /><br /><font >Gaurang Kant, the lawyer who represented Mehta, said, "The CIC had imposed the fine in excess by way of two orders against the same appeal."</font><br /><br /><font >In the RA Haritash vs Anand Bhushan case, the Delhi High Court took it on record that the information was ultimately</font><br /><br /><font >provided on March 27, 2010, when the application under RTI was originally filed on November 4, 2009.</font><br /><br /><font >The PIO claimed he had joined on November 18, 2009, 14 days after the RTI application was filed.</font><br /><br /><font >The HC ordered reduction of the penalty from Rs 25,000 (to be recovered from the official's salary) to just Rs 2,500 (to be recovered from his salary in 10 installments).</font><br /><br /><font >Vibhav Kumar, an activist-member of NGO Kabir, said, "Overall it seems that the judiciary is working to weaken the RTI Act. Orders like this wherein penalty amount is reduced will encourage more PIOs to not give information on time."</font><br /><br /><font >However, RTI activist Lokesh Batra, points out another aspect.</font><br /><br /><font >"Only if the Honourable High Court is convinced by the PIO that the delay was beyond his control for a certain period, then the Court is justified in reducing the penalty."</font><br /><br /><font >"However, even if the penalty has been reduced, the High Court has held the PIO guilty of delay and thus upheld the CIC decision."</font><br /><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Activists lament courts going soft on RTI offenders |
The trend of government officials approaching the High Court against the Central Information Commission's (CIC) decision imposing fines on PIOs for delay in information to applicants under the RTI Act has started a debate amongst the RTI activists.
Activists said very few information commissioners have levied monetary fine on the Public Information Officers (PIOs), who do not comply with the provisions of the Right to Information (RTI) Act. And now the decisions of those who impose fine are being challenged in the court. Two recent instances saw the Delhi High Court reduce the penalty imposed on the PIOs for not providing information on time. In case of Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) vs Atma Prakash Mehta case, justice S Muralidharan had reduced the penalty. He ordered for the penalty on the MCD official to be reduced from Rs 18,500 to Rs 7,000, to be recovered from him in two equal installments of Rs 3,500 per month in view of the "facts and circumstances" of the case. Gaurang Kant, the lawyer who represented Mehta, said, "The CIC had imposed the fine in excess by way of two orders against the same appeal." In the RA Haritash vs Anand Bhushan case, the Delhi High Court took it on record that the information was ultimately provided on March 27, 2010, when the application under RTI was originally filed on November 4, 2009. The PIO claimed he had joined on November 18, 2009, 14 days after the RTI application was filed. The HC ordered reduction of the penalty from Rs 25,000 (to be recovered from the official's salary) to just Rs 2,500 (to be recovered from his salary in 10 installments). Vibhav Kumar, an activist-member of NGO Kabir, said, "Overall it seems that the judiciary is working to weaken the RTI Act. Orders like this wherein penalty amount is reduced will encourage more PIOs to not give information on time." However, RTI activist Lokesh Batra, points out another aspect. "Only if the Honourable High Court is convinced by the PIO that the delay was beyond his control for a certain period, then the Court is justified in reducing the penalty." "However, even if the penalty has been reduced, the High Court has held the PIO guilty of delay and thus upheld the CIC decision." |