Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/activists-say-land-rights-law-isnt-helping-tribals-by-tripti-lahiri-4048/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/activists-say-land-rights-law-isnt-helping-tribals-by-tripti-lahiri-4048/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/activists-say-land-rights-law-isnt-helping-tribals-by-tripti-lahiri-4048/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/activists-say-land-rights-law-isnt-helping-tribals-by-tripti-lahiri-4048/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680f65379bf0d-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680f65379bf0d-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680f65379bf0d-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680f65379bf0d-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680f65379bf0d-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680f65379bf0d-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680f65379bf0d-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680f65379bf0d-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680f65379bf0d-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 3958, 'title' => 'Activists Say Land Rights Law Isn’t Helping Tribals by Tripti Lahiri', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><br /> </font> <div align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">When India&rsquo;s Forest Rights Act was passed in 2006, it was criticized by environmentalists who were concerned that it would undo the country&rsquo;s wildlife reserves. On the flip side, tribal rights advocates were concerned that the people the law was really meant to help wouldn&rsquo;t benefit.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Since it came into effect in January 2008, India has blocked at least one megaproject &ndash; Vedanta&rsquo;s bauxite mine in Orissa &ndash; on the grounds that it violated the Forest Rights Act. A massive Posco project in Orissa is also being reconsidered, on the grounds that it may violate the rights of people living off the forest land earmarked to be cleared for the steel plant.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">At the same time the Ministry of Tribal Affairs says it has distributed over a million forest land title&nbsp; to tribal and other individuals and groups up to the end of last month.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">But forest rights groups aren&rsquo;t necessarily cheered by these developments. One tribal rights group says the findings of these panels show the law isn&rsquo;t, in fact, properly being followed or intermediate clearances wouldn&rsquo;t have been given in the first place.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;These are inquiry committees that in the case of just two projects have found that in both cases the environment ministry broke the law. And there are hundreds of projects like that,&rdquo; said Shankar Gopalakrishnan, of the Campaign for Survival and Dignity ,which is made up of tribal and forest resident groups from 10 states. &ldquo;This is not evidence of the environment ministry following the forest law. This is in fact evidence of the opposite.&rdquo;</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A spokeswoman at the Ministry of Environment and Forests said on Tuesday that only environment minister Jairam Ramesh could comment. Mr. Ramesh couldn&rsquo;t immediately be reached. In the case of Posco, the project was announced in 2005, well before the forest rights legislation was passed. And in the case of the Vedanta project, the key go-ahead came from the Supreme Court in 2008, not from the environment ministry.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The group is also concerned that the vast majority of titles&nbsp; being given out are for individual rights rather than community rights. Many of these concerns were expressed by the Ministry of Tribal Affairs, in charge of implementing the law, in a letter to the states earlier this year.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;Only 1.76% of the forest rights claims filed relate to community rights,&rdquo; the ministry said, urging states to generate more awareness among communities that they could claim these rights.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Ministry of Tribal Affairs could not immediately be reached for comment.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Community rights can be asserted over land used for grazing or for water. And people in many parts of India still live by collecting what is called &ldquo;minor forest produce.&rdquo; With no formal recognition for their right to do this, many who live off the forest pay bribes to local forest officials to do so, Mr. Gopalakrishnan said.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;Where I&rsquo;m from in Tamil Nadu, adivasis (tribals) pay 100 rupees a day to collect minor forest produce,&rdquo; he said.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The law&rsquo;s focus on collective rights, an issue for which one of last year&rsquo;s Economic Nobel Prizes was awarded. It was meant to usher in a new and more democratic way of managing forests in India, vested in part in the people who still live in them.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">But so far it&rsquo;s working in the way some of its critics had feared, Mr. Gopalakrishnan admitted.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;What it has been reduced to is a land title distribution scheme and even that is not being done well,&rdquo; he said. &ldquo;One reason is obstructionism from the forest departments. They lose much more from these rights. They lose a great deal of their ability to extort money.&rdquo;</font><br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Wall Street Journal, 20 October, 2010, http://blogs.wsj.com/indiarealtime/2010/10/20/activists-say-land-rights-law-isn%E2%80%99t-helping-tribals/?mod=google_news_blog', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'activists-say-land-rights-law-isnt-helping-tribals-by-tripti-lahiri-4048', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4048, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 3958, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Activists Say Land Rights Law Isn’t Helping Tribals by Tripti Lahiri', 'metaKeywords' => 'Tribal Rights', 'metaDesc' => ' When India&rsquo;s Forest Rights Act was passed in 2006, it was criticized by environmentalists who were concerned that it would undo the country&rsquo;s wildlife reserves. On the flip side, tribal rights advocates were concerned that the people the law was...', 'disp' => '<font ><br /></font><div align="justify"><font >When India&rsquo;s Forest Rights Act was passed in 2006, it was criticized by environmentalists who were concerned that it would undo the country&rsquo;s wildlife reserves. On the flip side, tribal rights advocates were concerned that the people the law was really meant to help wouldn&rsquo;t benefit.</font><br /><br /><font >Since it came into effect in January 2008, India has blocked at least one megaproject &ndash; Vedanta&rsquo;s bauxite mine in Orissa &ndash; on the grounds that it violated the Forest Rights Act. A massive Posco project in Orissa is also being reconsidered, on the grounds that it may violate the rights of people living off the forest land earmarked to be cleared for the steel plant.</font><br /><br /><font >At the same time the Ministry of Tribal Affairs says it has distributed over a million forest land title&nbsp; to tribal and other individuals and groups up to the end of last month.</font><br /><br /><font >But forest rights groups aren&rsquo;t necessarily cheered by these developments. One tribal rights group says the findings of these panels show the law isn&rsquo;t, in fact, properly being followed or intermediate clearances wouldn&rsquo;t have been given in the first place.</font><br /><br /><font >&ldquo;These are inquiry committees that in the case of just two projects have found that in both cases the environment ministry broke the law. And there are hundreds of projects like that,&rdquo; said Shankar Gopalakrishnan, of the Campaign for Survival and Dignity ,which is made up of tribal and forest resident groups from 10 states. &ldquo;This is not evidence of the environment ministry following the forest law. This is in fact evidence of the opposite.&rdquo;</font><br /><br /><font >A spokeswoman at the Ministry of Environment and Forests said on Tuesday that only environment minister Jairam Ramesh could comment. Mr. Ramesh couldn&rsquo;t immediately be reached. In the case of Posco, the project was announced in 2005, well before the forest rights legislation was passed. And in the case of the Vedanta project, the key go-ahead came from the Supreme Court in 2008, not from the environment ministry.</font><br /><br /><font >The group is also concerned that the vast majority of titles&nbsp; being given out are for individual rights rather than community rights. Many of these concerns were expressed by the Ministry of Tribal Affairs, in charge of implementing the law, in a letter to the states earlier this year.</font><br /><br /><font >&ldquo;Only 1.76% of the forest rights claims filed relate to community rights,&rdquo; the ministry said, urging states to generate more awareness among communities that they could claim these rights.</font><br /><br /><font >The Ministry of Tribal Affairs could not immediately be reached for comment.</font><br /><br /><font >Community rights can be asserted over land used for grazing or for water. And people in many parts of India still live by collecting what is called &ldquo;minor forest produce.&rdquo; With no formal recognition for their right to do this, many who live off the forest pay bribes to local forest officials to do so, Mr. Gopalakrishnan said.</font><br /><br /><font >&ldquo;Where I&rsquo;m from in Tamil Nadu, adivasis (tribals) pay 100 rupees a day to collect minor forest produce,&rdquo; he said.</font><br /><br /><font >The law&rsquo;s focus on collective rights, an issue for which one of last year&rsquo;s Economic Nobel Prizes was awarded. It was meant to usher in a new and more democratic way of managing forests in India, vested in part in the people who still live in them.</font><br /><br /><font >But so far it&rsquo;s working in the way some of its critics had feared, Mr. Gopalakrishnan admitted.</font><br /><br /><font >&ldquo;What it has been reduced to is a land title distribution scheme and even that is not being done well,&rdquo; he said. &ldquo;One reason is obstructionism from the forest departments. They lose much more from these rights. They lose a great deal of their ability to extort money.&rdquo;</font><br /><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 3958, 'title' => 'Activists Say Land Rights Law Isn’t Helping Tribals by Tripti Lahiri', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><br /> </font> <div align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">When India&rsquo;s Forest Rights Act was passed in 2006, it was criticized by environmentalists who were concerned that it would undo the country&rsquo;s wildlife reserves. On the flip side, tribal rights advocates were concerned that the people the law was really meant to help wouldn&rsquo;t benefit.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Since it came into effect in January 2008, India has blocked at least one megaproject &ndash; Vedanta&rsquo;s bauxite mine in Orissa &ndash; on the grounds that it violated the Forest Rights Act. A massive Posco project in Orissa is also being reconsidered, on the grounds that it may violate the rights of people living off the forest land earmarked to be cleared for the steel plant.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">At the same time the Ministry of Tribal Affairs says it has distributed over a million forest land title&nbsp; to tribal and other individuals and groups up to the end of last month.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">But forest rights groups aren&rsquo;t necessarily cheered by these developments. One tribal rights group says the findings of these panels show the law isn&rsquo;t, in fact, properly being followed or intermediate clearances wouldn&rsquo;t have been given in the first place.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;These are inquiry committees that in the case of just two projects have found that in both cases the environment ministry broke the law. And there are hundreds of projects like that,&rdquo; said Shankar Gopalakrishnan, of the Campaign for Survival and Dignity ,which is made up of tribal and forest resident groups from 10 states. &ldquo;This is not evidence of the environment ministry following the forest law. This is in fact evidence of the opposite.&rdquo;</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A spokeswoman at the Ministry of Environment and Forests said on Tuesday that only environment minister Jairam Ramesh could comment. Mr. Ramesh couldn&rsquo;t immediately be reached. In the case of Posco, the project was announced in 2005, well before the forest rights legislation was passed. And in the case of the Vedanta project, the key go-ahead came from the Supreme Court in 2008, not from the environment ministry.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The group is also concerned that the vast majority of titles&nbsp; being given out are for individual rights rather than community rights. Many of these concerns were expressed by the Ministry of Tribal Affairs, in charge of implementing the law, in a letter to the states earlier this year.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;Only 1.76% of the forest rights claims filed relate to community rights,&rdquo; the ministry said, urging states to generate more awareness among communities that they could claim these rights.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Ministry of Tribal Affairs could not immediately be reached for comment.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Community rights can be asserted over land used for grazing or for water. And people in many parts of India still live by collecting what is called &ldquo;minor forest produce.&rdquo; With no formal recognition for their right to do this, many who live off the forest pay bribes to local forest officials to do so, Mr. Gopalakrishnan said.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;Where I&rsquo;m from in Tamil Nadu, adivasis (tribals) pay 100 rupees a day to collect minor forest produce,&rdquo; he said.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The law&rsquo;s focus on collective rights, an issue for which one of last year&rsquo;s Economic Nobel Prizes was awarded. It was meant to usher in a new and more democratic way of managing forests in India, vested in part in the people who still live in them.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">But so far it&rsquo;s working in the way some of its critics had feared, Mr. Gopalakrishnan admitted.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;What it has been reduced to is a land title distribution scheme and even that is not being done well,&rdquo; he said. &ldquo;One reason is obstructionism from the forest departments. They lose much more from these rights. They lose a great deal of their ability to extort money.&rdquo;</font><br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Wall Street Journal, 20 October, 2010, http://blogs.wsj.com/indiarealtime/2010/10/20/activists-say-land-rights-law-isn%E2%80%99t-helping-tribals/?mod=google_news_blog', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'activists-say-land-rights-law-isnt-helping-tribals-by-tripti-lahiri-4048', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4048, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 3958 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Activists Say Land Rights Law Isn’t Helping Tribals by Tripti Lahiri' $metaKeywords = 'Tribal Rights' $metaDesc = ' When India&rsquo;s Forest Rights Act was passed in 2006, it was criticized by environmentalists who were concerned that it would undo the country&rsquo;s wildlife reserves. On the flip side, tribal rights advocates were concerned that the people the law was...' $disp = '<font ><br /></font><div align="justify"><font >When India&rsquo;s Forest Rights Act was passed in 2006, it was criticized by environmentalists who were concerned that it would undo the country&rsquo;s wildlife reserves. On the flip side, tribal rights advocates were concerned that the people the law was really meant to help wouldn&rsquo;t benefit.</font><br /><br /><font >Since it came into effect in January 2008, India has blocked at least one megaproject &ndash; Vedanta&rsquo;s bauxite mine in Orissa &ndash; on the grounds that it violated the Forest Rights Act. A massive Posco project in Orissa is also being reconsidered, on the grounds that it may violate the rights of people living off the forest land earmarked to be cleared for the steel plant.</font><br /><br /><font >At the same time the Ministry of Tribal Affairs says it has distributed over a million forest land title&nbsp; to tribal and other individuals and groups up to the end of last month.</font><br /><br /><font >But forest rights groups aren&rsquo;t necessarily cheered by these developments. One tribal rights group says the findings of these panels show the law isn&rsquo;t, in fact, properly being followed or intermediate clearances wouldn&rsquo;t have been given in the first place.</font><br /><br /><font >&ldquo;These are inquiry committees that in the case of just two projects have found that in both cases the environment ministry broke the law. And there are hundreds of projects like that,&rdquo; said Shankar Gopalakrishnan, of the Campaign for Survival and Dignity ,which is made up of tribal and forest resident groups from 10 states. &ldquo;This is not evidence of the environment ministry following the forest law. This is in fact evidence of the opposite.&rdquo;</font><br /><br /><font >A spokeswoman at the Ministry of Environment and Forests said on Tuesday that only environment minister Jairam Ramesh could comment. Mr. Ramesh couldn&rsquo;t immediately be reached. In the case of Posco, the project was announced in 2005, well before the forest rights legislation was passed. And in the case of the Vedanta project, the key go-ahead came from the Supreme Court in 2008, not from the environment ministry.</font><br /><br /><font >The group is also concerned that the vast majority of titles&nbsp; being given out are for individual rights rather than community rights. Many of these concerns were expressed by the Ministry of Tribal Affairs, in charge of implementing the law, in a letter to the states earlier this year.</font><br /><br /><font >&ldquo;Only 1.76% of the forest rights claims filed relate to community rights,&rdquo; the ministry said, urging states to generate more awareness among communities that they could claim these rights.</font><br /><br /><font >The Ministry of Tribal Affairs could not immediately be reached for comment.</font><br /><br /><font >Community rights can be asserted over land used for grazing or for water. And people in many parts of India still live by collecting what is called &ldquo;minor forest produce.&rdquo; With no formal recognition for their right to do this, many who live off the forest pay bribes to local forest officials to do so, Mr. Gopalakrishnan said.</font><br /><br /><font >&ldquo;Where I&rsquo;m from in Tamil Nadu, adivasis (tribals) pay 100 rupees a day to collect minor forest produce,&rdquo; he said.</font><br /><br /><font >The law&rsquo;s focus on collective rights, an issue for which one of last year&rsquo;s Economic Nobel Prizes was awarded. It was meant to usher in a new and more democratic way of managing forests in India, vested in part in the people who still live in them.</font><br /><br /><font >But so far it&rsquo;s working in the way some of its critics had feared, Mr. Gopalakrishnan admitted.</font><br /><br /><font >&ldquo;What it has been reduced to is a land title distribution scheme and even that is not being done well,&rdquo; he said. &ldquo;One reason is obstructionism from the forest departments. They lose much more from these rights. They lose a great deal of their ability to extort money.&rdquo;</font><br /><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/activists-say-land-rights-law-isnt-helping-tribals-by-tripti-lahiri-4048.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Activists Say Land Rights Law Isn’t Helping Tribals by Tripti Lahiri | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" When India’s Forest Rights Act was passed in 2006, it was criticized by environmentalists who were concerned that it would undo the country’s wildlife reserves. On the flip side, tribal rights advocates were concerned that the people the law was..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Activists Say Land Rights Law Isn’t Helping Tribals by Tripti Lahiri</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <font ><br /></font><div align="justify"><font >When India’s Forest Rights Act was passed in 2006, it was criticized by environmentalists who were concerned that it would undo the country’s wildlife reserves. On the flip side, tribal rights advocates were concerned that the people the law was really meant to help wouldn’t benefit.</font><br /><br /><font >Since it came into effect in January 2008, India has blocked at least one megaproject – Vedanta’s bauxite mine in Orissa – on the grounds that it violated the Forest Rights Act. A massive Posco project in Orissa is also being reconsidered, on the grounds that it may violate the rights of people living off the forest land earmarked to be cleared for the steel plant.</font><br /><br /><font >At the same time the Ministry of Tribal Affairs says it has distributed over a million forest land title to tribal and other individuals and groups up to the end of last month.</font><br /><br /><font >But forest rights groups aren’t necessarily cheered by these developments. One tribal rights group says the findings of these panels show the law isn’t, in fact, properly being followed or intermediate clearances wouldn’t have been given in the first place.</font><br /><br /><font >“These are inquiry committees that in the case of just two projects have found that in both cases the environment ministry broke the law. And there are hundreds of projects like that,” said Shankar Gopalakrishnan, of the Campaign for Survival and Dignity ,which is made up of tribal and forest resident groups from 10 states. “This is not evidence of the environment ministry following the forest law. This is in fact evidence of the opposite.”</font><br /><br /><font >A spokeswoman at the Ministry of Environment and Forests said on Tuesday that only environment minister Jairam Ramesh could comment. Mr. Ramesh couldn’t immediately be reached. In the case of Posco, the project was announced in 2005, well before the forest rights legislation was passed. And in the case of the Vedanta project, the key go-ahead came from the Supreme Court in 2008, not from the environment ministry.</font><br /><br /><font >The group is also concerned that the vast majority of titles being given out are for individual rights rather than community rights. Many of these concerns were expressed by the Ministry of Tribal Affairs, in charge of implementing the law, in a letter to the states earlier this year.</font><br /><br /><font >“Only 1.76% of the forest rights claims filed relate to community rights,” the ministry said, urging states to generate more awareness among communities that they could claim these rights.</font><br /><br /><font >The Ministry of Tribal Affairs could not immediately be reached for comment.</font><br /><br /><font >Community rights can be asserted over land used for grazing or for water. And people in many parts of India still live by collecting what is called “minor forest produce.” With no formal recognition for their right to do this, many who live off the forest pay bribes to local forest officials to do so, Mr. Gopalakrishnan said.</font><br /><br /><font >“Where I’m from in Tamil Nadu, adivasis (tribals) pay 100 rupees a day to collect minor forest produce,” he said.</font><br /><br /><font >The law’s focus on collective rights, an issue for which one of last year’s Economic Nobel Prizes was awarded. It was meant to usher in a new and more democratic way of managing forests in India, vested in part in the people who still live in them.</font><br /><br /><font >But so far it’s working in the way some of its critics had feared, Mr. Gopalakrishnan admitted.</font><br /><br /><font >“What it has been reduced to is a land title distribution scheme and even that is not being done well,” he said. “One reason is obstructionism from the forest departments. They lose much more from these rights. They lose a great deal of their ability to extort money.”</font><br /><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680f65379bf0d-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680f65379bf0d-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680f65379bf0d-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680f65379bf0d-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680f65379bf0d-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680f65379bf0d-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680f65379bf0d-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680f65379bf0d-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680f65379bf0d-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 3958, 'title' => 'Activists Say Land Rights Law Isn’t Helping Tribals by Tripti Lahiri', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><br /> </font> <div align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">When India&rsquo;s Forest Rights Act was passed in 2006, it was criticized by environmentalists who were concerned that it would undo the country&rsquo;s wildlife reserves. On the flip side, tribal rights advocates were concerned that the people the law was really meant to help wouldn&rsquo;t benefit.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Since it came into effect in January 2008, India has blocked at least one megaproject &ndash; Vedanta&rsquo;s bauxite mine in Orissa &ndash; on the grounds that it violated the Forest Rights Act. A massive Posco project in Orissa is also being reconsidered, on the grounds that it may violate the rights of people living off the forest land earmarked to be cleared for the steel plant.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">At the same time the Ministry of Tribal Affairs says it has distributed over a million forest land title&nbsp; to tribal and other individuals and groups up to the end of last month.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">But forest rights groups aren&rsquo;t necessarily cheered by these developments. One tribal rights group says the findings of these panels show the law isn&rsquo;t, in fact, properly being followed or intermediate clearances wouldn&rsquo;t have been given in the first place.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;These are inquiry committees that in the case of just two projects have found that in both cases the environment ministry broke the law. And there are hundreds of projects like that,&rdquo; said Shankar Gopalakrishnan, of the Campaign for Survival and Dignity ,which is made up of tribal and forest resident groups from 10 states. &ldquo;This is not evidence of the environment ministry following the forest law. This is in fact evidence of the opposite.&rdquo;</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A spokeswoman at the Ministry of Environment and Forests said on Tuesday that only environment minister Jairam Ramesh could comment. Mr. Ramesh couldn&rsquo;t immediately be reached. In the case of Posco, the project was announced in 2005, well before the forest rights legislation was passed. And in the case of the Vedanta project, the key go-ahead came from the Supreme Court in 2008, not from the environment ministry.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The group is also concerned that the vast majority of titles&nbsp; being given out are for individual rights rather than community rights. Many of these concerns were expressed by the Ministry of Tribal Affairs, in charge of implementing the law, in a letter to the states earlier this year.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;Only 1.76% of the forest rights claims filed relate to community rights,&rdquo; the ministry said, urging states to generate more awareness among communities that they could claim these rights.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Ministry of Tribal Affairs could not immediately be reached for comment.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Community rights can be asserted over land used for grazing or for water. And people in many parts of India still live by collecting what is called &ldquo;minor forest produce.&rdquo; With no formal recognition for their right to do this, many who live off the forest pay bribes to local forest officials to do so, Mr. Gopalakrishnan said.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;Where I&rsquo;m from in Tamil Nadu, adivasis (tribals) pay 100 rupees a day to collect minor forest produce,&rdquo; he said.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The law&rsquo;s focus on collective rights, an issue for which one of last year&rsquo;s Economic Nobel Prizes was awarded. It was meant to usher in a new and more democratic way of managing forests in India, vested in part in the people who still live in them.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">But so far it&rsquo;s working in the way some of its critics had feared, Mr. Gopalakrishnan admitted.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;What it has been reduced to is a land title distribution scheme and even that is not being done well,&rdquo; he said. &ldquo;One reason is obstructionism from the forest departments. They lose much more from these rights. They lose a great deal of their ability to extort money.&rdquo;</font><br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Wall Street Journal, 20 October, 2010, http://blogs.wsj.com/indiarealtime/2010/10/20/activists-say-land-rights-law-isn%E2%80%99t-helping-tribals/?mod=google_news_blog', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'activists-say-land-rights-law-isnt-helping-tribals-by-tripti-lahiri-4048', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4048, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 3958, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Activists Say Land Rights Law Isn’t Helping Tribals by Tripti Lahiri', 'metaKeywords' => 'Tribal Rights', 'metaDesc' => ' When India&rsquo;s Forest Rights Act was passed in 2006, it was criticized by environmentalists who were concerned that it would undo the country&rsquo;s wildlife reserves. On the flip side, tribal rights advocates were concerned that the people the law was...', 'disp' => '<font ><br /></font><div align="justify"><font >When India&rsquo;s Forest Rights Act was passed in 2006, it was criticized by environmentalists who were concerned that it would undo the country&rsquo;s wildlife reserves. On the flip side, tribal rights advocates were concerned that the people the law was really meant to help wouldn&rsquo;t benefit.</font><br /><br /><font >Since it came into effect in January 2008, India has blocked at least one megaproject &ndash; Vedanta&rsquo;s bauxite mine in Orissa &ndash; on the grounds that it violated the Forest Rights Act. A massive Posco project in Orissa is also being reconsidered, on the grounds that it may violate the rights of people living off the forest land earmarked to be cleared for the steel plant.</font><br /><br /><font >At the same time the Ministry of Tribal Affairs says it has distributed over a million forest land title&nbsp; to tribal and other individuals and groups up to the end of last month.</font><br /><br /><font >But forest rights groups aren&rsquo;t necessarily cheered by these developments. One tribal rights group says the findings of these panels show the law isn&rsquo;t, in fact, properly being followed or intermediate clearances wouldn&rsquo;t have been given in the first place.</font><br /><br /><font >&ldquo;These are inquiry committees that in the case of just two projects have found that in both cases the environment ministry broke the law. And there are hundreds of projects like that,&rdquo; said Shankar Gopalakrishnan, of the Campaign for Survival and Dignity ,which is made up of tribal and forest resident groups from 10 states. &ldquo;This is not evidence of the environment ministry following the forest law. This is in fact evidence of the opposite.&rdquo;</font><br /><br /><font >A spokeswoman at the Ministry of Environment and Forests said on Tuesday that only environment minister Jairam Ramesh could comment. Mr. Ramesh couldn&rsquo;t immediately be reached. In the case of Posco, the project was announced in 2005, well before the forest rights legislation was passed. And in the case of the Vedanta project, the key go-ahead came from the Supreme Court in 2008, not from the environment ministry.</font><br /><br /><font >The group is also concerned that the vast majority of titles&nbsp; being given out are for individual rights rather than community rights. Many of these concerns were expressed by the Ministry of Tribal Affairs, in charge of implementing the law, in a letter to the states earlier this year.</font><br /><br /><font >&ldquo;Only 1.76% of the forest rights claims filed relate to community rights,&rdquo; the ministry said, urging states to generate more awareness among communities that they could claim these rights.</font><br /><br /><font >The Ministry of Tribal Affairs could not immediately be reached for comment.</font><br /><br /><font >Community rights can be asserted over land used for grazing or for water. And people in many parts of India still live by collecting what is called &ldquo;minor forest produce.&rdquo; With no formal recognition for their right to do this, many who live off the forest pay bribes to local forest officials to do so, Mr. Gopalakrishnan said.</font><br /><br /><font >&ldquo;Where I&rsquo;m from in Tamil Nadu, adivasis (tribals) pay 100 rupees a day to collect minor forest produce,&rdquo; he said.</font><br /><br /><font >The law&rsquo;s focus on collective rights, an issue for which one of last year&rsquo;s Economic Nobel Prizes was awarded. It was meant to usher in a new and more democratic way of managing forests in India, vested in part in the people who still live in them.</font><br /><br /><font >But so far it&rsquo;s working in the way some of its critics had feared, Mr. Gopalakrishnan admitted.</font><br /><br /><font >&ldquo;What it has been reduced to is a land title distribution scheme and even that is not being done well,&rdquo; he said. &ldquo;One reason is obstructionism from the forest departments. They lose much more from these rights. They lose a great deal of their ability to extort money.&rdquo;</font><br /><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 3958, 'title' => 'Activists Say Land Rights Law Isn’t Helping Tribals by Tripti Lahiri', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><br /> </font> <div align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">When India&rsquo;s Forest Rights Act was passed in 2006, it was criticized by environmentalists who were concerned that it would undo the country&rsquo;s wildlife reserves. On the flip side, tribal rights advocates were concerned that the people the law was really meant to help wouldn&rsquo;t benefit.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Since it came into effect in January 2008, India has blocked at least one megaproject &ndash; Vedanta&rsquo;s bauxite mine in Orissa &ndash; on the grounds that it violated the Forest Rights Act. A massive Posco project in Orissa is also being reconsidered, on the grounds that it may violate the rights of people living off the forest land earmarked to be cleared for the steel plant.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">At the same time the Ministry of Tribal Affairs says it has distributed over a million forest land title&nbsp; to tribal and other individuals and groups up to the end of last month.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">But forest rights groups aren&rsquo;t necessarily cheered by these developments. One tribal rights group says the findings of these panels show the law isn&rsquo;t, in fact, properly being followed or intermediate clearances wouldn&rsquo;t have been given in the first place.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;These are inquiry committees that in the case of just two projects have found that in both cases the environment ministry broke the law. And there are hundreds of projects like that,&rdquo; said Shankar Gopalakrishnan, of the Campaign for Survival and Dignity ,which is made up of tribal and forest resident groups from 10 states. &ldquo;This is not evidence of the environment ministry following the forest law. This is in fact evidence of the opposite.&rdquo;</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A spokeswoman at the Ministry of Environment and Forests said on Tuesday that only environment minister Jairam Ramesh could comment. Mr. Ramesh couldn&rsquo;t immediately be reached. In the case of Posco, the project was announced in 2005, well before the forest rights legislation was passed. And in the case of the Vedanta project, the key go-ahead came from the Supreme Court in 2008, not from the environment ministry.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The group is also concerned that the vast majority of titles&nbsp; being given out are for individual rights rather than community rights. Many of these concerns were expressed by the Ministry of Tribal Affairs, in charge of implementing the law, in a letter to the states earlier this year.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;Only 1.76% of the forest rights claims filed relate to community rights,&rdquo; the ministry said, urging states to generate more awareness among communities that they could claim these rights.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Ministry of Tribal Affairs could not immediately be reached for comment.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Community rights can be asserted over land used for grazing or for water. And people in many parts of India still live by collecting what is called &ldquo;minor forest produce.&rdquo; With no formal recognition for their right to do this, many who live off the forest pay bribes to local forest officials to do so, Mr. Gopalakrishnan said.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;Where I&rsquo;m from in Tamil Nadu, adivasis (tribals) pay 100 rupees a day to collect minor forest produce,&rdquo; he said.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The law&rsquo;s focus on collective rights, an issue for which one of last year&rsquo;s Economic Nobel Prizes was awarded. It was meant to usher in a new and more democratic way of managing forests in India, vested in part in the people who still live in them.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">But so far it&rsquo;s working in the way some of its critics had feared, Mr. Gopalakrishnan admitted.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;What it has been reduced to is a land title distribution scheme and even that is not being done well,&rdquo; he said. &ldquo;One reason is obstructionism from the forest departments. They lose much more from these rights. They lose a great deal of their ability to extort money.&rdquo;</font><br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Wall Street Journal, 20 October, 2010, http://blogs.wsj.com/indiarealtime/2010/10/20/activists-say-land-rights-law-isn%E2%80%99t-helping-tribals/?mod=google_news_blog', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'activists-say-land-rights-law-isnt-helping-tribals-by-tripti-lahiri-4048', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4048, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 3958 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Activists Say Land Rights Law Isn’t Helping Tribals by Tripti Lahiri' $metaKeywords = 'Tribal Rights' $metaDesc = ' When India&rsquo;s Forest Rights Act was passed in 2006, it was criticized by environmentalists who were concerned that it would undo the country&rsquo;s wildlife reserves. On the flip side, tribal rights advocates were concerned that the people the law was...' $disp = '<font ><br /></font><div align="justify"><font >When India&rsquo;s Forest Rights Act was passed in 2006, it was criticized by environmentalists who were concerned that it would undo the country&rsquo;s wildlife reserves. On the flip side, tribal rights advocates were concerned that the people the law was really meant to help wouldn&rsquo;t benefit.</font><br /><br /><font >Since it came into effect in January 2008, India has blocked at least one megaproject &ndash; Vedanta&rsquo;s bauxite mine in Orissa &ndash; on the grounds that it violated the Forest Rights Act. A massive Posco project in Orissa is also being reconsidered, on the grounds that it may violate the rights of people living off the forest land earmarked to be cleared for the steel plant.</font><br /><br /><font >At the same time the Ministry of Tribal Affairs says it has distributed over a million forest land title&nbsp; to tribal and other individuals and groups up to the end of last month.</font><br /><br /><font >But forest rights groups aren&rsquo;t necessarily cheered by these developments. One tribal rights group says the findings of these panels show the law isn&rsquo;t, in fact, properly being followed or intermediate clearances wouldn&rsquo;t have been given in the first place.</font><br /><br /><font >&ldquo;These are inquiry committees that in the case of just two projects have found that in both cases the environment ministry broke the law. And there are hundreds of projects like that,&rdquo; said Shankar Gopalakrishnan, of the Campaign for Survival and Dignity ,which is made up of tribal and forest resident groups from 10 states. &ldquo;This is not evidence of the environment ministry following the forest law. This is in fact evidence of the opposite.&rdquo;</font><br /><br /><font >A spokeswoman at the Ministry of Environment and Forests said on Tuesday that only environment minister Jairam Ramesh could comment. Mr. Ramesh couldn&rsquo;t immediately be reached. In the case of Posco, the project was announced in 2005, well before the forest rights legislation was passed. And in the case of the Vedanta project, the key go-ahead came from the Supreme Court in 2008, not from the environment ministry.</font><br /><br /><font >The group is also concerned that the vast majority of titles&nbsp; being given out are for individual rights rather than community rights. Many of these concerns were expressed by the Ministry of Tribal Affairs, in charge of implementing the law, in a letter to the states earlier this year.</font><br /><br /><font >&ldquo;Only 1.76% of the forest rights claims filed relate to community rights,&rdquo; the ministry said, urging states to generate more awareness among communities that they could claim these rights.</font><br /><br /><font >The Ministry of Tribal Affairs could not immediately be reached for comment.</font><br /><br /><font >Community rights can be asserted over land used for grazing or for water. And people in many parts of India still live by collecting what is called &ldquo;minor forest produce.&rdquo; With no formal recognition for their right to do this, many who live off the forest pay bribes to local forest officials to do so, Mr. Gopalakrishnan said.</font><br /><br /><font >&ldquo;Where I&rsquo;m from in Tamil Nadu, adivasis (tribals) pay 100 rupees a day to collect minor forest produce,&rdquo; he said.</font><br /><br /><font >The law&rsquo;s focus on collective rights, an issue for which one of last year&rsquo;s Economic Nobel Prizes was awarded. It was meant to usher in a new and more democratic way of managing forests in India, vested in part in the people who still live in them.</font><br /><br /><font >But so far it&rsquo;s working in the way some of its critics had feared, Mr. Gopalakrishnan admitted.</font><br /><br /><font >&ldquo;What it has been reduced to is a land title distribution scheme and even that is not being done well,&rdquo; he said. &ldquo;One reason is obstructionism from the forest departments. They lose much more from these rights. They lose a great deal of their ability to extort money.&rdquo;</font><br /><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/activists-say-land-rights-law-isnt-helping-tribals-by-tripti-lahiri-4048.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Activists Say Land Rights Law Isn’t Helping Tribals by Tripti Lahiri | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" When India’s Forest Rights Act was passed in 2006, it was criticized by environmentalists who were concerned that it would undo the country’s wildlife reserves. On the flip side, tribal rights advocates were concerned that the people the law was..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Activists Say Land Rights Law Isn’t Helping Tribals by Tripti Lahiri</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <font ><br /></font><div align="justify"><font >When India’s Forest Rights Act was passed in 2006, it was criticized by environmentalists who were concerned that it would undo the country’s wildlife reserves. On the flip side, tribal rights advocates were concerned that the people the law was really meant to help wouldn’t benefit.</font><br /><br /><font >Since it came into effect in January 2008, India has blocked at least one megaproject – Vedanta’s bauxite mine in Orissa – on the grounds that it violated the Forest Rights Act. A massive Posco project in Orissa is also being reconsidered, on the grounds that it may violate the rights of people living off the forest land earmarked to be cleared for the steel plant.</font><br /><br /><font >At the same time the Ministry of Tribal Affairs says it has distributed over a million forest land title to tribal and other individuals and groups up to the end of last month.</font><br /><br /><font >But forest rights groups aren’t necessarily cheered by these developments. One tribal rights group says the findings of these panels show the law isn’t, in fact, properly being followed or intermediate clearances wouldn’t have been given in the first place.</font><br /><br /><font >“These are inquiry committees that in the case of just two projects have found that in both cases the environment ministry broke the law. And there are hundreds of projects like that,” said Shankar Gopalakrishnan, of the Campaign for Survival and Dignity ,which is made up of tribal and forest resident groups from 10 states. “This is not evidence of the environment ministry following the forest law. This is in fact evidence of the opposite.”</font><br /><br /><font >A spokeswoman at the Ministry of Environment and Forests said on Tuesday that only environment minister Jairam Ramesh could comment. Mr. Ramesh couldn’t immediately be reached. In the case of Posco, the project was announced in 2005, well before the forest rights legislation was passed. And in the case of the Vedanta project, the key go-ahead came from the Supreme Court in 2008, not from the environment ministry.</font><br /><br /><font >The group is also concerned that the vast majority of titles being given out are for individual rights rather than community rights. Many of these concerns were expressed by the Ministry of Tribal Affairs, in charge of implementing the law, in a letter to the states earlier this year.</font><br /><br /><font >“Only 1.76% of the forest rights claims filed relate to community rights,” the ministry said, urging states to generate more awareness among communities that they could claim these rights.</font><br /><br /><font >The Ministry of Tribal Affairs could not immediately be reached for comment.</font><br /><br /><font >Community rights can be asserted over land used for grazing or for water. And people in many parts of India still live by collecting what is called “minor forest produce.” With no formal recognition for their right to do this, many who live off the forest pay bribes to local forest officials to do so, Mr. Gopalakrishnan said.</font><br /><br /><font >“Where I’m from in Tamil Nadu, adivasis (tribals) pay 100 rupees a day to collect minor forest produce,” he said.</font><br /><br /><font >The law’s focus on collective rights, an issue for which one of last year’s Economic Nobel Prizes was awarded. It was meant to usher in a new and more democratic way of managing forests in India, vested in part in the people who still live in them.</font><br /><br /><font >But so far it’s working in the way some of its critics had feared, Mr. Gopalakrishnan admitted.</font><br /><br /><font >“What it has been reduced to is a land title distribution scheme and even that is not being done well,” he said. “One reason is obstructionism from the forest departments. They lose much more from these rights. They lose a great deal of their ability to extort money.”</font><br /><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680f65379bf0d-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680f65379bf0d-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680f65379bf0d-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680f65379bf0d-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680f65379bf0d-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680f65379bf0d-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680f65379bf0d-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680f65379bf0d-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680f65379bf0d-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 3958, 'title' => 'Activists Say Land Rights Law Isn’t Helping Tribals by Tripti Lahiri', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><br /> </font> <div align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">When India&rsquo;s Forest Rights Act was passed in 2006, it was criticized by environmentalists who were concerned that it would undo the country&rsquo;s wildlife reserves. On the flip side, tribal rights advocates were concerned that the people the law was really meant to help wouldn&rsquo;t benefit.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Since it came into effect in January 2008, India has blocked at least one megaproject &ndash; Vedanta&rsquo;s bauxite mine in Orissa &ndash; on the grounds that it violated the Forest Rights Act. A massive Posco project in Orissa is also being reconsidered, on the grounds that it may violate the rights of people living off the forest land earmarked to be cleared for the steel plant.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">At the same time the Ministry of Tribal Affairs says it has distributed over a million forest land title&nbsp; to tribal and other individuals and groups up to the end of last month.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">But forest rights groups aren&rsquo;t necessarily cheered by these developments. One tribal rights group says the findings of these panels show the law isn&rsquo;t, in fact, properly being followed or intermediate clearances wouldn&rsquo;t have been given in the first place.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;These are inquiry committees that in the case of just two projects have found that in both cases the environment ministry broke the law. And there are hundreds of projects like that,&rdquo; said Shankar Gopalakrishnan, of the Campaign for Survival and Dignity ,which is made up of tribal and forest resident groups from 10 states. &ldquo;This is not evidence of the environment ministry following the forest law. This is in fact evidence of the opposite.&rdquo;</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A spokeswoman at the Ministry of Environment and Forests said on Tuesday that only environment minister Jairam Ramesh could comment. Mr. Ramesh couldn&rsquo;t immediately be reached. In the case of Posco, the project was announced in 2005, well before the forest rights legislation was passed. And in the case of the Vedanta project, the key go-ahead came from the Supreme Court in 2008, not from the environment ministry.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The group is also concerned that the vast majority of titles&nbsp; being given out are for individual rights rather than community rights. Many of these concerns were expressed by the Ministry of Tribal Affairs, in charge of implementing the law, in a letter to the states earlier this year.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;Only 1.76% of the forest rights claims filed relate to community rights,&rdquo; the ministry said, urging states to generate more awareness among communities that they could claim these rights.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Ministry of Tribal Affairs could not immediately be reached for comment.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Community rights can be asserted over land used for grazing or for water. And people in many parts of India still live by collecting what is called &ldquo;minor forest produce.&rdquo; With no formal recognition for their right to do this, many who live off the forest pay bribes to local forest officials to do so, Mr. Gopalakrishnan said.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;Where I&rsquo;m from in Tamil Nadu, adivasis (tribals) pay 100 rupees a day to collect minor forest produce,&rdquo; he said.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The law&rsquo;s focus on collective rights, an issue for which one of last year&rsquo;s Economic Nobel Prizes was awarded. It was meant to usher in a new and more democratic way of managing forests in India, vested in part in the people who still live in them.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">But so far it&rsquo;s working in the way some of its critics had feared, Mr. Gopalakrishnan admitted.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;What it has been reduced to is a land title distribution scheme and even that is not being done well,&rdquo; he said. &ldquo;One reason is obstructionism from the forest departments. They lose much more from these rights. They lose a great deal of their ability to extort money.&rdquo;</font><br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Wall Street Journal, 20 October, 2010, http://blogs.wsj.com/indiarealtime/2010/10/20/activists-say-land-rights-law-isn%E2%80%99t-helping-tribals/?mod=google_news_blog', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'activists-say-land-rights-law-isnt-helping-tribals-by-tripti-lahiri-4048', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4048, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 3958, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Activists Say Land Rights Law Isn’t Helping Tribals by Tripti Lahiri', 'metaKeywords' => 'Tribal Rights', 'metaDesc' => ' When India&rsquo;s Forest Rights Act was passed in 2006, it was criticized by environmentalists who were concerned that it would undo the country&rsquo;s wildlife reserves. On the flip side, tribal rights advocates were concerned that the people the law was...', 'disp' => '<font ><br /></font><div align="justify"><font >When India&rsquo;s Forest Rights Act was passed in 2006, it was criticized by environmentalists who were concerned that it would undo the country&rsquo;s wildlife reserves. On the flip side, tribal rights advocates were concerned that the people the law was really meant to help wouldn&rsquo;t benefit.</font><br /><br /><font >Since it came into effect in January 2008, India has blocked at least one megaproject &ndash; Vedanta&rsquo;s bauxite mine in Orissa &ndash; on the grounds that it violated the Forest Rights Act. A massive Posco project in Orissa is also being reconsidered, on the grounds that it may violate the rights of people living off the forest land earmarked to be cleared for the steel plant.</font><br /><br /><font >At the same time the Ministry of Tribal Affairs says it has distributed over a million forest land title&nbsp; to tribal and other individuals and groups up to the end of last month.</font><br /><br /><font >But forest rights groups aren&rsquo;t necessarily cheered by these developments. One tribal rights group says the findings of these panels show the law isn&rsquo;t, in fact, properly being followed or intermediate clearances wouldn&rsquo;t have been given in the first place.</font><br /><br /><font >&ldquo;These are inquiry committees that in the case of just two projects have found that in both cases the environment ministry broke the law. And there are hundreds of projects like that,&rdquo; said Shankar Gopalakrishnan, of the Campaign for Survival and Dignity ,which is made up of tribal and forest resident groups from 10 states. &ldquo;This is not evidence of the environment ministry following the forest law. This is in fact evidence of the opposite.&rdquo;</font><br /><br /><font >A spokeswoman at the Ministry of Environment and Forests said on Tuesday that only environment minister Jairam Ramesh could comment. Mr. Ramesh couldn&rsquo;t immediately be reached. In the case of Posco, the project was announced in 2005, well before the forest rights legislation was passed. And in the case of the Vedanta project, the key go-ahead came from the Supreme Court in 2008, not from the environment ministry.</font><br /><br /><font >The group is also concerned that the vast majority of titles&nbsp; being given out are for individual rights rather than community rights. Many of these concerns were expressed by the Ministry of Tribal Affairs, in charge of implementing the law, in a letter to the states earlier this year.</font><br /><br /><font >&ldquo;Only 1.76% of the forest rights claims filed relate to community rights,&rdquo; the ministry said, urging states to generate more awareness among communities that they could claim these rights.</font><br /><br /><font >The Ministry of Tribal Affairs could not immediately be reached for comment.</font><br /><br /><font >Community rights can be asserted over land used for grazing or for water. And people in many parts of India still live by collecting what is called &ldquo;minor forest produce.&rdquo; With no formal recognition for their right to do this, many who live off the forest pay bribes to local forest officials to do so, Mr. Gopalakrishnan said.</font><br /><br /><font >&ldquo;Where I&rsquo;m from in Tamil Nadu, adivasis (tribals) pay 100 rupees a day to collect minor forest produce,&rdquo; he said.</font><br /><br /><font >The law&rsquo;s focus on collective rights, an issue for which one of last year&rsquo;s Economic Nobel Prizes was awarded. It was meant to usher in a new and more democratic way of managing forests in India, vested in part in the people who still live in them.</font><br /><br /><font >But so far it&rsquo;s working in the way some of its critics had feared, Mr. Gopalakrishnan admitted.</font><br /><br /><font >&ldquo;What it has been reduced to is a land title distribution scheme and even that is not being done well,&rdquo; he said. &ldquo;One reason is obstructionism from the forest departments. They lose much more from these rights. They lose a great deal of their ability to extort money.&rdquo;</font><br /><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 3958, 'title' => 'Activists Say Land Rights Law Isn’t Helping Tribals by Tripti Lahiri', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><br /> </font> <div align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">When India&rsquo;s Forest Rights Act was passed in 2006, it was criticized by environmentalists who were concerned that it would undo the country&rsquo;s wildlife reserves. On the flip side, tribal rights advocates were concerned that the people the law was really meant to help wouldn&rsquo;t benefit.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Since it came into effect in January 2008, India has blocked at least one megaproject &ndash; Vedanta&rsquo;s bauxite mine in Orissa &ndash; on the grounds that it violated the Forest Rights Act. A massive Posco project in Orissa is also being reconsidered, on the grounds that it may violate the rights of people living off the forest land earmarked to be cleared for the steel plant.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">At the same time the Ministry of Tribal Affairs says it has distributed over a million forest land title&nbsp; to tribal and other individuals and groups up to the end of last month.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">But forest rights groups aren&rsquo;t necessarily cheered by these developments. One tribal rights group says the findings of these panels show the law isn&rsquo;t, in fact, properly being followed or intermediate clearances wouldn&rsquo;t have been given in the first place.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;These are inquiry committees that in the case of just two projects have found that in both cases the environment ministry broke the law. And there are hundreds of projects like that,&rdquo; said Shankar Gopalakrishnan, of the Campaign for Survival and Dignity ,which is made up of tribal and forest resident groups from 10 states. &ldquo;This is not evidence of the environment ministry following the forest law. This is in fact evidence of the opposite.&rdquo;</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A spokeswoman at the Ministry of Environment and Forests said on Tuesday that only environment minister Jairam Ramesh could comment. Mr. Ramesh couldn&rsquo;t immediately be reached. In the case of Posco, the project was announced in 2005, well before the forest rights legislation was passed. And in the case of the Vedanta project, the key go-ahead came from the Supreme Court in 2008, not from the environment ministry.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The group is also concerned that the vast majority of titles&nbsp; being given out are for individual rights rather than community rights. Many of these concerns were expressed by the Ministry of Tribal Affairs, in charge of implementing the law, in a letter to the states earlier this year.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;Only 1.76% of the forest rights claims filed relate to community rights,&rdquo; the ministry said, urging states to generate more awareness among communities that they could claim these rights.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Ministry of Tribal Affairs could not immediately be reached for comment.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Community rights can be asserted over land used for grazing or for water. And people in many parts of India still live by collecting what is called &ldquo;minor forest produce.&rdquo; With no formal recognition for their right to do this, many who live off the forest pay bribes to local forest officials to do so, Mr. Gopalakrishnan said.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;Where I&rsquo;m from in Tamil Nadu, adivasis (tribals) pay 100 rupees a day to collect minor forest produce,&rdquo; he said.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The law&rsquo;s focus on collective rights, an issue for which one of last year&rsquo;s Economic Nobel Prizes was awarded. It was meant to usher in a new and more democratic way of managing forests in India, vested in part in the people who still live in them.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">But so far it&rsquo;s working in the way some of its critics had feared, Mr. Gopalakrishnan admitted.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;What it has been reduced to is a land title distribution scheme and even that is not being done well,&rdquo; he said. &ldquo;One reason is obstructionism from the forest departments. They lose much more from these rights. They lose a great deal of their ability to extort money.&rdquo;</font><br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Wall Street Journal, 20 October, 2010, http://blogs.wsj.com/indiarealtime/2010/10/20/activists-say-land-rights-law-isn%E2%80%99t-helping-tribals/?mod=google_news_blog', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'activists-say-land-rights-law-isnt-helping-tribals-by-tripti-lahiri-4048', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4048, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 3958 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Activists Say Land Rights Law Isn’t Helping Tribals by Tripti Lahiri' $metaKeywords = 'Tribal Rights' $metaDesc = ' When India&rsquo;s Forest Rights Act was passed in 2006, it was criticized by environmentalists who were concerned that it would undo the country&rsquo;s wildlife reserves. On the flip side, tribal rights advocates were concerned that the people the law was...' $disp = '<font ><br /></font><div align="justify"><font >When India&rsquo;s Forest Rights Act was passed in 2006, it was criticized by environmentalists who were concerned that it would undo the country&rsquo;s wildlife reserves. On the flip side, tribal rights advocates were concerned that the people the law was really meant to help wouldn&rsquo;t benefit.</font><br /><br /><font >Since it came into effect in January 2008, India has blocked at least one megaproject &ndash; Vedanta&rsquo;s bauxite mine in Orissa &ndash; on the grounds that it violated the Forest Rights Act. A massive Posco project in Orissa is also being reconsidered, on the grounds that it may violate the rights of people living off the forest land earmarked to be cleared for the steel plant.</font><br /><br /><font >At the same time the Ministry of Tribal Affairs says it has distributed over a million forest land title&nbsp; to tribal and other individuals and groups up to the end of last month.</font><br /><br /><font >But forest rights groups aren&rsquo;t necessarily cheered by these developments. One tribal rights group says the findings of these panels show the law isn&rsquo;t, in fact, properly being followed or intermediate clearances wouldn&rsquo;t have been given in the first place.</font><br /><br /><font >&ldquo;These are inquiry committees that in the case of just two projects have found that in both cases the environment ministry broke the law. And there are hundreds of projects like that,&rdquo; said Shankar Gopalakrishnan, of the Campaign for Survival and Dignity ,which is made up of tribal and forest resident groups from 10 states. &ldquo;This is not evidence of the environment ministry following the forest law. This is in fact evidence of the opposite.&rdquo;</font><br /><br /><font >A spokeswoman at the Ministry of Environment and Forests said on Tuesday that only environment minister Jairam Ramesh could comment. Mr. Ramesh couldn&rsquo;t immediately be reached. In the case of Posco, the project was announced in 2005, well before the forest rights legislation was passed. And in the case of the Vedanta project, the key go-ahead came from the Supreme Court in 2008, not from the environment ministry.</font><br /><br /><font >The group is also concerned that the vast majority of titles&nbsp; being given out are for individual rights rather than community rights. Many of these concerns were expressed by the Ministry of Tribal Affairs, in charge of implementing the law, in a letter to the states earlier this year.</font><br /><br /><font >&ldquo;Only 1.76% of the forest rights claims filed relate to community rights,&rdquo; the ministry said, urging states to generate more awareness among communities that they could claim these rights.</font><br /><br /><font >The Ministry of Tribal Affairs could not immediately be reached for comment.</font><br /><br /><font >Community rights can be asserted over land used for grazing or for water. And people in many parts of India still live by collecting what is called &ldquo;minor forest produce.&rdquo; With no formal recognition for their right to do this, many who live off the forest pay bribes to local forest officials to do so, Mr. Gopalakrishnan said.</font><br /><br /><font >&ldquo;Where I&rsquo;m from in Tamil Nadu, adivasis (tribals) pay 100 rupees a day to collect minor forest produce,&rdquo; he said.</font><br /><br /><font >The law&rsquo;s focus on collective rights, an issue for which one of last year&rsquo;s Economic Nobel Prizes was awarded. It was meant to usher in a new and more democratic way of managing forests in India, vested in part in the people who still live in them.</font><br /><br /><font >But so far it&rsquo;s working in the way some of its critics had feared, Mr. Gopalakrishnan admitted.</font><br /><br /><font >&ldquo;What it has been reduced to is a land title distribution scheme and even that is not being done well,&rdquo; he said. &ldquo;One reason is obstructionism from the forest departments. They lose much more from these rights. They lose a great deal of their ability to extort money.&rdquo;</font><br /><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/activists-say-land-rights-law-isnt-helping-tribals-by-tripti-lahiri-4048.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Activists Say Land Rights Law Isn’t Helping Tribals by Tripti Lahiri | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" When India’s Forest Rights Act was passed in 2006, it was criticized by environmentalists who were concerned that it would undo the country’s wildlife reserves. On the flip side, tribal rights advocates were concerned that the people the law was..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Activists Say Land Rights Law Isn’t Helping Tribals by Tripti Lahiri</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <font ><br /></font><div align="justify"><font >When India’s Forest Rights Act was passed in 2006, it was criticized by environmentalists who were concerned that it would undo the country’s wildlife reserves. On the flip side, tribal rights advocates were concerned that the people the law was really meant to help wouldn’t benefit.</font><br /><br /><font >Since it came into effect in January 2008, India has blocked at least one megaproject – Vedanta’s bauxite mine in Orissa – on the grounds that it violated the Forest Rights Act. A massive Posco project in Orissa is also being reconsidered, on the grounds that it may violate the rights of people living off the forest land earmarked to be cleared for the steel plant.</font><br /><br /><font >At the same time the Ministry of Tribal Affairs says it has distributed over a million forest land title to tribal and other individuals and groups up to the end of last month.</font><br /><br /><font >But forest rights groups aren’t necessarily cheered by these developments. One tribal rights group says the findings of these panels show the law isn’t, in fact, properly being followed or intermediate clearances wouldn’t have been given in the first place.</font><br /><br /><font >“These are inquiry committees that in the case of just two projects have found that in both cases the environment ministry broke the law. And there are hundreds of projects like that,” said Shankar Gopalakrishnan, of the Campaign for Survival and Dignity ,which is made up of tribal and forest resident groups from 10 states. “This is not evidence of the environment ministry following the forest law. This is in fact evidence of the opposite.”</font><br /><br /><font >A spokeswoman at the Ministry of Environment and Forests said on Tuesday that only environment minister Jairam Ramesh could comment. Mr. Ramesh couldn’t immediately be reached. In the case of Posco, the project was announced in 2005, well before the forest rights legislation was passed. And in the case of the Vedanta project, the key go-ahead came from the Supreme Court in 2008, not from the environment ministry.</font><br /><br /><font >The group is also concerned that the vast majority of titles being given out are for individual rights rather than community rights. Many of these concerns were expressed by the Ministry of Tribal Affairs, in charge of implementing the law, in a letter to the states earlier this year.</font><br /><br /><font >“Only 1.76% of the forest rights claims filed relate to community rights,” the ministry said, urging states to generate more awareness among communities that they could claim these rights.</font><br /><br /><font >The Ministry of Tribal Affairs could not immediately be reached for comment.</font><br /><br /><font >Community rights can be asserted over land used for grazing or for water. And people in many parts of India still live by collecting what is called “minor forest produce.” With no formal recognition for their right to do this, many who live off the forest pay bribes to local forest officials to do so, Mr. Gopalakrishnan said.</font><br /><br /><font >“Where I’m from in Tamil Nadu, adivasis (tribals) pay 100 rupees a day to collect minor forest produce,” he said.</font><br /><br /><font >The law’s focus on collective rights, an issue for which one of last year’s Economic Nobel Prizes was awarded. It was meant to usher in a new and more democratic way of managing forests in India, vested in part in the people who still live in them.</font><br /><br /><font >But so far it’s working in the way some of its critics had feared, Mr. Gopalakrishnan admitted.</font><br /><br /><font >“What it has been reduced to is a land title distribution scheme and even that is not being done well,” he said. “One reason is obstructionism from the forest departments. They lose much more from these rights. They lose a great deal of their ability to extort money.”</font><br /><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 3958, 'title' => 'Activists Say Land Rights Law Isn’t Helping Tribals by Tripti Lahiri', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><br /> </font> <div align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">When India’s Forest Rights Act was passed in 2006, it was criticized by environmentalists who were concerned that it would undo the country’s wildlife reserves. On the flip side, tribal rights advocates were concerned that the people the law was really meant to help wouldn’t benefit.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Since it came into effect in January 2008, India has blocked at least one megaproject – Vedanta’s bauxite mine in Orissa – on the grounds that it violated the Forest Rights Act. A massive Posco project in Orissa is also being reconsidered, on the grounds that it may violate the rights of people living off the forest land earmarked to be cleared for the steel plant.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">At the same time the Ministry of Tribal Affairs says it has distributed over a million forest land title to tribal and other individuals and groups up to the end of last month.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">But forest rights groups aren’t necessarily cheered by these developments. One tribal rights group says the findings of these panels show the law isn’t, in fact, properly being followed or intermediate clearances wouldn’t have been given in the first place.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">“These are inquiry committees that in the case of just two projects have found that in both cases the environment ministry broke the law. And there are hundreds of projects like that,” said Shankar Gopalakrishnan, of the Campaign for Survival and Dignity ,which is made up of tribal and forest resident groups from 10 states. “This is not evidence of the environment ministry following the forest law. This is in fact evidence of the opposite.”</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A spokeswoman at the Ministry of Environment and Forests said on Tuesday that only environment minister Jairam Ramesh could comment. Mr. Ramesh couldn’t immediately be reached. In the case of Posco, the project was announced in 2005, well before the forest rights legislation was passed. And in the case of the Vedanta project, the key go-ahead came from the Supreme Court in 2008, not from the environment ministry.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The group is also concerned that the vast majority of titles being given out are for individual rights rather than community rights. Many of these concerns were expressed by the Ministry of Tribal Affairs, in charge of implementing the law, in a letter to the states earlier this year.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">“Only 1.76% of the forest rights claims filed relate to community rights,” the ministry said, urging states to generate more awareness among communities that they could claim these rights.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Ministry of Tribal Affairs could not immediately be reached for comment.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Community rights can be asserted over land used for grazing or for water. And people in many parts of India still live by collecting what is called “minor forest produce.” With no formal recognition for their right to do this, many who live off the forest pay bribes to local forest officials to do so, Mr. Gopalakrishnan said.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">“Where I’m from in Tamil Nadu, adivasis (tribals) pay 100 rupees a day to collect minor forest produce,” he said.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The law’s focus on collective rights, an issue for which one of last year’s Economic Nobel Prizes was awarded. It was meant to usher in a new and more democratic way of managing forests in India, vested in part in the people who still live in them.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">But so far it’s working in the way some of its critics had feared, Mr. Gopalakrishnan admitted.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">“What it has been reduced to is a land title distribution scheme and even that is not being done well,” he said. “One reason is obstructionism from the forest departments. They lose much more from these rights. They lose a great deal of their ability to extort money.”</font><br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Wall Street Journal, 20 October, 2010, http://blogs.wsj.com/indiarealtime/2010/10/20/activists-say-land-rights-law-isn%E2%80%99t-helping-tribals/?mod=google_news_blog', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'activists-say-land-rights-law-isnt-helping-tribals-by-tripti-lahiri-4048', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4048, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 3958, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Activists Say Land Rights Law Isn’t Helping Tribals by Tripti Lahiri', 'metaKeywords' => 'Tribal Rights', 'metaDesc' => ' When India’s Forest Rights Act was passed in 2006, it was criticized by environmentalists who were concerned that it would undo the country’s wildlife reserves. On the flip side, tribal rights advocates were concerned that the people the law was...', 'disp' => '<font ><br /></font><div align="justify"><font >When India’s Forest Rights Act was passed in 2006, it was criticized by environmentalists who were concerned that it would undo the country’s wildlife reserves. On the flip side, tribal rights advocates were concerned that the people the law was really meant to help wouldn’t benefit.</font><br /><br /><font >Since it came into effect in January 2008, India has blocked at least one megaproject – Vedanta’s bauxite mine in Orissa – on the grounds that it violated the Forest Rights Act. A massive Posco project in Orissa is also being reconsidered, on the grounds that it may violate the rights of people living off the forest land earmarked to be cleared for the steel plant.</font><br /><br /><font >At the same time the Ministry of Tribal Affairs says it has distributed over a million forest land title to tribal and other individuals and groups up to the end of last month.</font><br /><br /><font >But forest rights groups aren’t necessarily cheered by these developments. One tribal rights group says the findings of these panels show the law isn’t, in fact, properly being followed or intermediate clearances wouldn’t have been given in the first place.</font><br /><br /><font >“These are inquiry committees that in the case of just two projects have found that in both cases the environment ministry broke the law. And there are hundreds of projects like that,” said Shankar Gopalakrishnan, of the Campaign for Survival and Dignity ,which is made up of tribal and forest resident groups from 10 states. “This is not evidence of the environment ministry following the forest law. This is in fact evidence of the opposite.”</font><br /><br /><font >A spokeswoman at the Ministry of Environment and Forests said on Tuesday that only environment minister Jairam Ramesh could comment. Mr. Ramesh couldn’t immediately be reached. In the case of Posco, the project was announced in 2005, well before the forest rights legislation was passed. And in the case of the Vedanta project, the key go-ahead came from the Supreme Court in 2008, not from the environment ministry.</font><br /><br /><font >The group is also concerned that the vast majority of titles being given out are for individual rights rather than community rights. Many of these concerns were expressed by the Ministry of Tribal Affairs, in charge of implementing the law, in a letter to the states earlier this year.</font><br /><br /><font >“Only 1.76% of the forest rights claims filed relate to community rights,” the ministry said, urging states to generate more awareness among communities that they could claim these rights.</font><br /><br /><font >The Ministry of Tribal Affairs could not immediately be reached for comment.</font><br /><br /><font >Community rights can be asserted over land used for grazing or for water. And people in many parts of India still live by collecting what is called “minor forest produce.” With no formal recognition for their right to do this, many who live off the forest pay bribes to local forest officials to do so, Mr. Gopalakrishnan said.</font><br /><br /><font >“Where I’m from in Tamil Nadu, adivasis (tribals) pay 100 rupees a day to collect minor forest produce,” he said.</font><br /><br /><font >The law’s focus on collective rights, an issue for which one of last year’s Economic Nobel Prizes was awarded. It was meant to usher in a new and more democratic way of managing forests in India, vested in part in the people who still live in them.</font><br /><br /><font >But so far it’s working in the way some of its critics had feared, Mr. Gopalakrishnan admitted.</font><br /><br /><font >“What it has been reduced to is a land title distribution scheme and even that is not being done well,” he said. “One reason is obstructionism from the forest departments. They lose much more from these rights. They lose a great deal of their ability to extort money.”</font><br /><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 3958, 'title' => 'Activists Say Land Rights Law Isn’t Helping Tribals by Tripti Lahiri', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"><br /> </font> <div align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">When India’s Forest Rights Act was passed in 2006, it was criticized by environmentalists who were concerned that it would undo the country’s wildlife reserves. On the flip side, tribal rights advocates were concerned that the people the law was really meant to help wouldn’t benefit.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Since it came into effect in January 2008, India has blocked at least one megaproject – Vedanta’s bauxite mine in Orissa – on the grounds that it violated the Forest Rights Act. A massive Posco project in Orissa is also being reconsidered, on the grounds that it may violate the rights of people living off the forest land earmarked to be cleared for the steel plant.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">At the same time the Ministry of Tribal Affairs says it has distributed over a million forest land title to tribal and other individuals and groups up to the end of last month.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">But forest rights groups aren’t necessarily cheered by these developments. One tribal rights group says the findings of these panels show the law isn’t, in fact, properly being followed or intermediate clearances wouldn’t have been given in the first place.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">“These are inquiry committees that in the case of just two projects have found that in both cases the environment ministry broke the law. And there are hundreds of projects like that,” said Shankar Gopalakrishnan, of the Campaign for Survival and Dignity ,which is made up of tribal and forest resident groups from 10 states. “This is not evidence of the environment ministry following the forest law. This is in fact evidence of the opposite.”</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">A spokeswoman at the Ministry of Environment and Forests said on Tuesday that only environment minister Jairam Ramesh could comment. Mr. Ramesh couldn’t immediately be reached. In the case of Posco, the project was announced in 2005, well before the forest rights legislation was passed. And in the case of the Vedanta project, the key go-ahead came from the Supreme Court in 2008, not from the environment ministry.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The group is also concerned that the vast majority of titles being given out are for individual rights rather than community rights. Many of these concerns were expressed by the Ministry of Tribal Affairs, in charge of implementing the law, in a letter to the states earlier this year.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">“Only 1.76% of the forest rights claims filed relate to community rights,” the ministry said, urging states to generate more awareness among communities that they could claim these rights.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Ministry of Tribal Affairs could not immediately be reached for comment.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Community rights can be asserted over land used for grazing or for water. And people in many parts of India still live by collecting what is called “minor forest produce.” With no formal recognition for their right to do this, many who live off the forest pay bribes to local forest officials to do so, Mr. Gopalakrishnan said.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">“Where I’m from in Tamil Nadu, adivasis (tribals) pay 100 rupees a day to collect minor forest produce,” he said.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The law’s focus on collective rights, an issue for which one of last year’s Economic Nobel Prizes was awarded. It was meant to usher in a new and more democratic way of managing forests in India, vested in part in the people who still live in them.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">But so far it’s working in the way some of its critics had feared, Mr. Gopalakrishnan admitted.</font><br /> <br /> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">“What it has been reduced to is a land title distribution scheme and even that is not being done well,” he said. “One reason is obstructionism from the forest departments. They lose much more from these rights. They lose a great deal of their ability to extort money.”</font><br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Wall Street Journal, 20 October, 2010, http://blogs.wsj.com/indiarealtime/2010/10/20/activists-say-land-rights-law-isn%E2%80%99t-helping-tribals/?mod=google_news_blog', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'activists-say-land-rights-law-isnt-helping-tribals-by-tripti-lahiri-4048', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4048, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 3958 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Activists Say Land Rights Law Isn’t Helping Tribals by Tripti Lahiri' $metaKeywords = 'Tribal Rights' $metaDesc = ' When India’s Forest Rights Act was passed in 2006, it was criticized by environmentalists who were concerned that it would undo the country’s wildlife reserves. On the flip side, tribal rights advocates were concerned that the people the law was...' $disp = '<font ><br /></font><div align="justify"><font >When India’s Forest Rights Act was passed in 2006, it was criticized by environmentalists who were concerned that it would undo the country’s wildlife reserves. On the flip side, tribal rights advocates were concerned that the people the law was really meant to help wouldn’t benefit.</font><br /><br /><font >Since it came into effect in January 2008, India has blocked at least one megaproject – Vedanta’s bauxite mine in Orissa – on the grounds that it violated the Forest Rights Act. A massive Posco project in Orissa is also being reconsidered, on the grounds that it may violate the rights of people living off the forest land earmarked to be cleared for the steel plant.</font><br /><br /><font >At the same time the Ministry of Tribal Affairs says it has distributed over a million forest land title to tribal and other individuals and groups up to the end of last month.</font><br /><br /><font >But forest rights groups aren’t necessarily cheered by these developments. One tribal rights group says the findings of these panels show the law isn’t, in fact, properly being followed or intermediate clearances wouldn’t have been given in the first place.</font><br /><br /><font >“These are inquiry committees that in the case of just two projects have found that in both cases the environment ministry broke the law. And there are hundreds of projects like that,” said Shankar Gopalakrishnan, of the Campaign for Survival and Dignity ,which is made up of tribal and forest resident groups from 10 states. “This is not evidence of the environment ministry following the forest law. This is in fact evidence of the opposite.”</font><br /><br /><font >A spokeswoman at the Ministry of Environment and Forests said on Tuesday that only environment minister Jairam Ramesh could comment. Mr. Ramesh couldn’t immediately be reached. In the case of Posco, the project was announced in 2005, well before the forest rights legislation was passed. And in the case of the Vedanta project, the key go-ahead came from the Supreme Court in 2008, not from the environment ministry.</font><br /><br /><font >The group is also concerned that the vast majority of titles being given out are for individual rights rather than community rights. Many of these concerns were expressed by the Ministry of Tribal Affairs, in charge of implementing the law, in a letter to the states earlier this year.</font><br /><br /><font >“Only 1.76% of the forest rights claims filed relate to community rights,” the ministry said, urging states to generate more awareness among communities that they could claim these rights.</font><br /><br /><font >The Ministry of Tribal Affairs could not immediately be reached for comment.</font><br /><br /><font >Community rights can be asserted over land used for grazing or for water. And people in many parts of India still live by collecting what is called “minor forest produce.” With no formal recognition for their right to do this, many who live off the forest pay bribes to local forest officials to do so, Mr. Gopalakrishnan said.</font><br /><br /><font >“Where I’m from in Tamil Nadu, adivasis (tribals) pay 100 rupees a day to collect minor forest produce,” he said.</font><br /><br /><font >The law’s focus on collective rights, an issue for which one of last year’s Economic Nobel Prizes was awarded. It was meant to usher in a new and more democratic way of managing forests in India, vested in part in the people who still live in them.</font><br /><br /><font >But so far it’s working in the way some of its critics had feared, Mr. Gopalakrishnan admitted.</font><br /><br /><font >“What it has been reduced to is a land title distribution scheme and even that is not being done well,” he said. “One reason is obstructionism from the forest departments. They lose much more from these rights. They lose a great deal of their ability to extort money.”</font><br /><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Activists Say Land Rights Law Isn’t Helping Tribals by Tripti Lahiri |
When India’s Forest Rights Act was passed in 2006, it was criticized by environmentalists who were concerned that it would undo the country’s wildlife reserves. On the flip side, tribal rights advocates were concerned that the people the law was really meant to help wouldn’t benefit.
Since it came into effect in January 2008, India has blocked at least one megaproject – Vedanta’s bauxite mine in Orissa – on the grounds that it violated the Forest Rights Act. A massive Posco project in Orissa is also being reconsidered, on the grounds that it may violate the rights of people living off the forest land earmarked to be cleared for the steel plant. At the same time the Ministry of Tribal Affairs says it has distributed over a million forest land title to tribal and other individuals and groups up to the end of last month. But forest rights groups aren’t necessarily cheered by these developments. One tribal rights group says the findings of these panels show the law isn’t, in fact, properly being followed or intermediate clearances wouldn’t have been given in the first place. “These are inquiry committees that in the case of just two projects have found that in both cases the environment ministry broke the law. And there are hundreds of projects like that,” said Shankar Gopalakrishnan, of the Campaign for Survival and Dignity ,which is made up of tribal and forest resident groups from 10 states. “This is not evidence of the environment ministry following the forest law. This is in fact evidence of the opposite.” A spokeswoman at the Ministry of Environment and Forests said on Tuesday that only environment minister Jairam Ramesh could comment. Mr. Ramesh couldn’t immediately be reached. In the case of Posco, the project was announced in 2005, well before the forest rights legislation was passed. And in the case of the Vedanta project, the key go-ahead came from the Supreme Court in 2008, not from the environment ministry. The group is also concerned that the vast majority of titles being given out are for individual rights rather than community rights. Many of these concerns were expressed by the Ministry of Tribal Affairs, in charge of implementing the law, in a letter to the states earlier this year. “Only 1.76% of the forest rights claims filed relate to community rights,” the ministry said, urging states to generate more awareness among communities that they could claim these rights. The Ministry of Tribal Affairs could not immediately be reached for comment. Community rights can be asserted over land used for grazing or for water. And people in many parts of India still live by collecting what is called “minor forest produce.” With no formal recognition for their right to do this, many who live off the forest pay bribes to local forest officials to do so, Mr. Gopalakrishnan said. “Where I’m from in Tamil Nadu, adivasis (tribals) pay 100 rupees a day to collect minor forest produce,” he said. The law’s focus on collective rights, an issue for which one of last year’s Economic Nobel Prizes was awarded. It was meant to usher in a new and more democratic way of managing forests in India, vested in part in the people who still live in them. But so far it’s working in the way some of its critics had feared, Mr. Gopalakrishnan admitted. “What it has been reduced to is a land title distribution scheme and even that is not being done well,” he said. “One reason is obstructionism from the forest departments. They lose much more from these rights. They lose a great deal of their ability to extort money.” |