Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/after-dragging-feet-dose-of-tinkering-20764/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/after-dragging-feet-dose-of-tinkering-20764/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/after-dragging-feet-dose-of-tinkering-20764/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/after-dragging-feet-dose-of-tinkering-20764/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68053fefc79ad-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68053fefc79ad-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68053fefc79ad-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68053fefc79ad-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68053fefc79ad-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68053fefc79ad-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68053fefc79ad-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68053fefc79ad-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68053fefc79ad-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 20622, 'title' => 'After dragging feet, dose of tinkering', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> <em>Calcutta: </em>Mamata Banerjee's zeal for a new anti-fraud bill could delay action against Saradha for months but has only a few differences with the old Left-sponsored bill her government has withdrawn, officials said today. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;Except for three provisions and a few other minor changes, the language of the two bills is identical,&quot; a law department official said. </p> <p align="justify"> A senior Writers' bureaucrat said the legislative steps that the new bill must pass through will take up &quot;at least six to eight months&quot;. </p> <p align="justify"> Had the chief minister wanted to be armed with a bill immediately, she could have first pressed for presidential assent to the old bill - in limbo since its passage in 2009 - and then added the new provisions through amendments, law department officials said. </p> <p align="justify"> They said the amended bill could have been enacted in less than a month. &quot;But the chief minister is vehemently opposed to accepting a bill moved by the Left with minor amendments,&quot; a source said. </p> <p align="justify"> A copy of the West Bengal Protection of Interest of Depositors in Financial Establishments Bill, 2013, was circulated among MLAs today since the government plans to place it in the Assembly on April 30. </p> <p align="justify"> Officials said that after the Assembly passes it and the governor signs it, the new bill must be sent to the Union home ministry for clearance, then on to the Union finance ministry, and then to the Union law ministry before it reaches the President. </p> <p align="justify"> Although Mamata has requested President Pranab Mukherjee to fast-track the bill's clearance in Delhi, a senior IAS officer at Writers' said the due diligence cannot be hurried through. &quot;Even if everything is okay in the new bill, it will take at least six to eight months to get presidential assent,&quot; he said. </p> <p align="justify"> All this has prompted the Opposition charge that the state government is actually trying to shield Saradha by delaying a law against companies defrauding depositors. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;The government could have persuaded the Centre to clear the bill our Left government had sent in 2009, but it didn't. Now a fresh legislation is being brought. That will delay action against the Saradha owner,&quot; CPM state secretary Biman Bose said. </p> <p align="justify"> Some lawyers have cited the possibility of legal challenges further delaying the new bill's enactment as it seeks retrospective application. &quot;If a commission set up by the government recommends action against a company or people attached with it, the bill will apply retrospectively to allow this,&quot; a government panel lawyer said. </p> <p align="justify"> This provision, in Clause 22(2), may expose the bill to legal challenge, said former law minister Rabilal Moitra. &quot;Retrospective effect cannot be given to a bill with penal provisions.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> Officials said that if the old bill were enacted, its provisions would have applied from the day it was passed in 2009 and no retrospective effect would have been needed. </p> <p align="justify"> <em>PM stand</em> </p> <p align="justify"> The Centre too is keeping up pressure. The Prime Minister today said &quot;unauthorised collection of deposits&quot; with promises of &quot;exorbitant rate of return... is something which has to be curbed&quot;. Officials said the PMO and finance ministry would monitor all actions against such practice. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 28 April, 2013, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1130428/jsp/frontpage/story_16836948.jsp#.UXzx-Urcing', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'after-dragging-feet-dose-of-tinkering-20764', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 20764, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 20622, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | After dragging feet, dose of tinkering', 'metaKeywords' => 'Saradha Group,Chit fund,Fraud,crime,Corporate Governance', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Telegraph Calcutta: Mamata Banerjee's zeal for a new anti-fraud bill could delay action against Saradha for months but has only a few differences with the old Left-sponsored bill her government has withdrawn, officials said today. &quot;Except for three provisions and a...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>Calcutta: </em>Mamata Banerjee's zeal for a new anti-fraud bill could delay action against Saradha for months but has only a few differences with the old Left-sponsored bill her government has withdrawn, officials said today.</p><p align="justify">&quot;Except for three provisions and a few other minor changes, the language of the two bills is identical,&quot; a law department official said. </p><p align="justify">A senior Writers' bureaucrat said the legislative steps that the new bill must pass through will take up &quot;at least six to eight months&quot;.</p><p align="justify">Had the chief minister wanted to be armed with a bill immediately, she could have first pressed for presidential assent to the old bill - in limbo since its passage in 2009 - and then added the new provisions through amendments, law department officials said.</p><p align="justify">They said the amended bill could have been enacted in less than a month. &quot;But the chief minister is vehemently opposed to accepting a bill moved by the Left with minor amendments,&quot; a source said.</p><p align="justify">A copy of the West Bengal Protection of Interest of Depositors in Financial Establishments Bill, 2013, was circulated among MLAs today since the government plans to place it in the Assembly on April 30.</p><p align="justify">Officials said that after the Assembly passes it and the governor signs it, the new bill must be sent to the Union home ministry for clearance, then on to the Union finance ministry, and then to the Union law ministry before it reaches the President.</p><p align="justify">Although Mamata has requested President Pranab Mukherjee to fast-track the bill's clearance in Delhi, a senior IAS officer at Writers' said the due diligence cannot be hurried through. &quot;Even if everything is okay in the new bill, it will take at least six to eight months to get presidential assent,&quot; he said.</p><p align="justify">All this has prompted the Opposition charge that the state government is actually trying to shield Saradha by delaying a law against companies defrauding depositors.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The government could have persuaded the Centre to clear the bill our Left government had sent in 2009, but it didn't. Now a fresh legislation is being brought. That will delay action against the Saradha owner,&quot; CPM state secretary Biman Bose said.</p><p align="justify">Some lawyers have cited the possibility of legal challenges further delaying the new bill's enactment as it seeks retrospective application. &quot;If a commission set up by the government recommends action against a company or people attached with it, the bill will apply retrospectively to allow this,&quot; a government panel lawyer said.</p><p align="justify">This provision, in Clause 22(2), may expose the bill to legal challenge, said former law minister Rabilal Moitra. &quot;Retrospective effect cannot be given to a bill with penal provisions.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Officials said that if the old bill were enacted, its provisions would have applied from the day it was passed in 2009 and no retrospective effect would have been needed.</p><p align="justify"><em>PM stand</em></p><p align="justify">The Centre too is keeping up pressure. The Prime Minister today said &quot;unauthorised collection of deposits&quot; with promises of &quot;exorbitant rate of return... is something which has to be curbed&quot;. Officials said the PMO and finance ministry would monitor all actions against such practice. </p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 20622, 'title' => 'After dragging feet, dose of tinkering', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> <em>Calcutta: </em>Mamata Banerjee's zeal for a new anti-fraud bill could delay action against Saradha for months but has only a few differences with the old Left-sponsored bill her government has withdrawn, officials said today. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;Except for three provisions and a few other minor changes, the language of the two bills is identical,&quot; a law department official said. </p> <p align="justify"> A senior Writers' bureaucrat said the legislative steps that the new bill must pass through will take up &quot;at least six to eight months&quot;. </p> <p align="justify"> Had the chief minister wanted to be armed with a bill immediately, she could have first pressed for presidential assent to the old bill - in limbo since its passage in 2009 - and then added the new provisions through amendments, law department officials said. </p> <p align="justify"> They said the amended bill could have been enacted in less than a month. &quot;But the chief minister is vehemently opposed to accepting a bill moved by the Left with minor amendments,&quot; a source said. </p> <p align="justify"> A copy of the West Bengal Protection of Interest of Depositors in Financial Establishments Bill, 2013, was circulated among MLAs today since the government plans to place it in the Assembly on April 30. </p> <p align="justify"> Officials said that after the Assembly passes it and the governor signs it, the new bill must be sent to the Union home ministry for clearance, then on to the Union finance ministry, and then to the Union law ministry before it reaches the President. </p> <p align="justify"> Although Mamata has requested President Pranab Mukherjee to fast-track the bill's clearance in Delhi, a senior IAS officer at Writers' said the due diligence cannot be hurried through. &quot;Even if everything is okay in the new bill, it will take at least six to eight months to get presidential assent,&quot; he said. </p> <p align="justify"> All this has prompted the Opposition charge that the state government is actually trying to shield Saradha by delaying a law against companies defrauding depositors. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;The government could have persuaded the Centre to clear the bill our Left government had sent in 2009, but it didn't. Now a fresh legislation is being brought. That will delay action against the Saradha owner,&quot; CPM state secretary Biman Bose said. </p> <p align="justify"> Some lawyers have cited the possibility of legal challenges further delaying the new bill's enactment as it seeks retrospective application. &quot;If a commission set up by the government recommends action against a company or people attached with it, the bill will apply retrospectively to allow this,&quot; a government panel lawyer said. </p> <p align="justify"> This provision, in Clause 22(2), may expose the bill to legal challenge, said former law minister Rabilal Moitra. &quot;Retrospective effect cannot be given to a bill with penal provisions.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> Officials said that if the old bill were enacted, its provisions would have applied from the day it was passed in 2009 and no retrospective effect would have been needed. </p> <p align="justify"> <em>PM stand</em> </p> <p align="justify"> The Centre too is keeping up pressure. The Prime Minister today said &quot;unauthorised collection of deposits&quot; with promises of &quot;exorbitant rate of return... is something which has to be curbed&quot;. Officials said the PMO and finance ministry would monitor all actions against such practice. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 28 April, 2013, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1130428/jsp/frontpage/story_16836948.jsp#.UXzx-Urcing', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'after-dragging-feet-dose-of-tinkering-20764', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 20764, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 20622 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | After dragging feet, dose of tinkering' $metaKeywords = 'Saradha Group,Chit fund,Fraud,crime,Corporate Governance' $metaDesc = ' -The Telegraph Calcutta: Mamata Banerjee's zeal for a new anti-fraud bill could delay action against Saradha for months but has only a few differences with the old Left-sponsored bill her government has withdrawn, officials said today. &quot;Except for three provisions and a...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>Calcutta: </em>Mamata Banerjee's zeal for a new anti-fraud bill could delay action against Saradha for months but has only a few differences with the old Left-sponsored bill her government has withdrawn, officials said today.</p><p align="justify">&quot;Except for three provisions and a few other minor changes, the language of the two bills is identical,&quot; a law department official said. </p><p align="justify">A senior Writers' bureaucrat said the legislative steps that the new bill must pass through will take up &quot;at least six to eight months&quot;.</p><p align="justify">Had the chief minister wanted to be armed with a bill immediately, she could have first pressed for presidential assent to the old bill - in limbo since its passage in 2009 - and then added the new provisions through amendments, law department officials said.</p><p align="justify">They said the amended bill could have been enacted in less than a month. &quot;But the chief minister is vehemently opposed to accepting a bill moved by the Left with minor amendments,&quot; a source said.</p><p align="justify">A copy of the West Bengal Protection of Interest of Depositors in Financial Establishments Bill, 2013, was circulated among MLAs today since the government plans to place it in the Assembly on April 30.</p><p align="justify">Officials said that after the Assembly passes it and the governor signs it, the new bill must be sent to the Union home ministry for clearance, then on to the Union finance ministry, and then to the Union law ministry before it reaches the President.</p><p align="justify">Although Mamata has requested President Pranab Mukherjee to fast-track the bill's clearance in Delhi, a senior IAS officer at Writers' said the due diligence cannot be hurried through. &quot;Even if everything is okay in the new bill, it will take at least six to eight months to get presidential assent,&quot; he said.</p><p align="justify">All this has prompted the Opposition charge that the state government is actually trying to shield Saradha by delaying a law against companies defrauding depositors.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The government could have persuaded the Centre to clear the bill our Left government had sent in 2009, but it didn't. Now a fresh legislation is being brought. That will delay action against the Saradha owner,&quot; CPM state secretary Biman Bose said.</p><p align="justify">Some lawyers have cited the possibility of legal challenges further delaying the new bill's enactment as it seeks retrospective application. &quot;If a commission set up by the government recommends action against a company or people attached with it, the bill will apply retrospectively to allow this,&quot; a government panel lawyer said.</p><p align="justify">This provision, in Clause 22(2), may expose the bill to legal challenge, said former law minister Rabilal Moitra. &quot;Retrospective effect cannot be given to a bill with penal provisions.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Officials said that if the old bill were enacted, its provisions would have applied from the day it was passed in 2009 and no retrospective effect would have been needed.</p><p align="justify"><em>PM stand</em></p><p align="justify">The Centre too is keeping up pressure. The Prime Minister today said &quot;unauthorised collection of deposits&quot; with promises of &quot;exorbitant rate of return... is something which has to be curbed&quot;. Officials said the PMO and finance ministry would monitor all actions against such practice. </p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/after-dragging-feet-dose-of-tinkering-20764.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | After dragging feet, dose of tinkering | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Telegraph Calcutta: Mamata Banerjee's zeal for a new anti-fraud bill could delay action against Saradha for months but has only a few differences with the old Left-sponsored bill her government has withdrawn, officials said today. "Except for three provisions and a..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>After dragging feet, dose of tinkering</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>Calcutta: </em>Mamata Banerjee's zeal for a new anti-fraud bill could delay action against Saradha for months but has only a few differences with the old Left-sponsored bill her government has withdrawn, officials said today.</p><p align="justify">"Except for three provisions and a few other minor changes, the language of the two bills is identical," a law department official said. </p><p align="justify">A senior Writers' bureaucrat said the legislative steps that the new bill must pass through will take up "at least six to eight months".</p><p align="justify">Had the chief minister wanted to be armed with a bill immediately, she could have first pressed for presidential assent to the old bill - in limbo since its passage in 2009 - and then added the new provisions through amendments, law department officials said.</p><p align="justify">They said the amended bill could have been enacted in less than a month. "But the chief minister is vehemently opposed to accepting a bill moved by the Left with minor amendments," a source said.</p><p align="justify">A copy of the West Bengal Protection of Interest of Depositors in Financial Establishments Bill, 2013, was circulated among MLAs today since the government plans to place it in the Assembly on April 30.</p><p align="justify">Officials said that after the Assembly passes it and the governor signs it, the new bill must be sent to the Union home ministry for clearance, then on to the Union finance ministry, and then to the Union law ministry before it reaches the President.</p><p align="justify">Although Mamata has requested President Pranab Mukherjee to fast-track the bill's clearance in Delhi, a senior IAS officer at Writers' said the due diligence cannot be hurried through. "Even if everything is okay in the new bill, it will take at least six to eight months to get presidential assent," he said.</p><p align="justify">All this has prompted the Opposition charge that the state government is actually trying to shield Saradha by delaying a law against companies defrauding depositors.</p><p align="justify">"The government could have persuaded the Centre to clear the bill our Left government had sent in 2009, but it didn't. Now a fresh legislation is being brought. That will delay action against the Saradha owner," CPM state secretary Biman Bose said.</p><p align="justify">Some lawyers have cited the possibility of legal challenges further delaying the new bill's enactment as it seeks retrospective application. "If a commission set up by the government recommends action against a company or people attached with it, the bill will apply retrospectively to allow this," a government panel lawyer said.</p><p align="justify">This provision, in Clause 22(2), may expose the bill to legal challenge, said former law minister Rabilal Moitra. "Retrospective effect cannot be given to a bill with penal provisions."</p><p align="justify">Officials said that if the old bill were enacted, its provisions would have applied from the day it was passed in 2009 and no retrospective effect would have been needed.</p><p align="justify"><em>PM stand</em></p><p align="justify">The Centre too is keeping up pressure. The Prime Minister today said "unauthorised collection of deposits" with promises of "exorbitant rate of return... is something which has to be curbed". Officials said the PMO and finance ministry would monitor all actions against such practice. </p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68053fefc79ad-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68053fefc79ad-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68053fefc79ad-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68053fefc79ad-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68053fefc79ad-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68053fefc79ad-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68053fefc79ad-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68053fefc79ad-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68053fefc79ad-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 20622, 'title' => 'After dragging feet, dose of tinkering', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> <em>Calcutta: </em>Mamata Banerjee's zeal for a new anti-fraud bill could delay action against Saradha for months but has only a few differences with the old Left-sponsored bill her government has withdrawn, officials said today. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;Except for three provisions and a few other minor changes, the language of the two bills is identical,&quot; a law department official said. </p> <p align="justify"> A senior Writers' bureaucrat said the legislative steps that the new bill must pass through will take up &quot;at least six to eight months&quot;. </p> <p align="justify"> Had the chief minister wanted to be armed with a bill immediately, she could have first pressed for presidential assent to the old bill - in limbo since its passage in 2009 - and then added the new provisions through amendments, law department officials said. </p> <p align="justify"> They said the amended bill could have been enacted in less than a month. &quot;But the chief minister is vehemently opposed to accepting a bill moved by the Left with minor amendments,&quot; a source said. </p> <p align="justify"> A copy of the West Bengal Protection of Interest of Depositors in Financial Establishments Bill, 2013, was circulated among MLAs today since the government plans to place it in the Assembly on April 30. </p> <p align="justify"> Officials said that after the Assembly passes it and the governor signs it, the new bill must be sent to the Union home ministry for clearance, then on to the Union finance ministry, and then to the Union law ministry before it reaches the President. </p> <p align="justify"> Although Mamata has requested President Pranab Mukherjee to fast-track the bill's clearance in Delhi, a senior IAS officer at Writers' said the due diligence cannot be hurried through. &quot;Even if everything is okay in the new bill, it will take at least six to eight months to get presidential assent,&quot; he said. </p> <p align="justify"> All this has prompted the Opposition charge that the state government is actually trying to shield Saradha by delaying a law against companies defrauding depositors. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;The government could have persuaded the Centre to clear the bill our Left government had sent in 2009, but it didn't. Now a fresh legislation is being brought. That will delay action against the Saradha owner,&quot; CPM state secretary Biman Bose said. </p> <p align="justify"> Some lawyers have cited the possibility of legal challenges further delaying the new bill's enactment as it seeks retrospective application. &quot;If a commission set up by the government recommends action against a company or people attached with it, the bill will apply retrospectively to allow this,&quot; a government panel lawyer said. </p> <p align="justify"> This provision, in Clause 22(2), may expose the bill to legal challenge, said former law minister Rabilal Moitra. &quot;Retrospective effect cannot be given to a bill with penal provisions.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> Officials said that if the old bill were enacted, its provisions would have applied from the day it was passed in 2009 and no retrospective effect would have been needed. </p> <p align="justify"> <em>PM stand</em> </p> <p align="justify"> The Centre too is keeping up pressure. The Prime Minister today said &quot;unauthorised collection of deposits&quot; with promises of &quot;exorbitant rate of return... is something which has to be curbed&quot;. Officials said the PMO and finance ministry would monitor all actions against such practice. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 28 April, 2013, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1130428/jsp/frontpage/story_16836948.jsp#.UXzx-Urcing', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'after-dragging-feet-dose-of-tinkering-20764', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 20764, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 20622, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | After dragging feet, dose of tinkering', 'metaKeywords' => 'Saradha Group,Chit fund,Fraud,crime,Corporate Governance', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Telegraph Calcutta: Mamata Banerjee's zeal for a new anti-fraud bill could delay action against Saradha for months but has only a few differences with the old Left-sponsored bill her government has withdrawn, officials said today. &quot;Except for three provisions and a...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>Calcutta: </em>Mamata Banerjee's zeal for a new anti-fraud bill could delay action against Saradha for months but has only a few differences with the old Left-sponsored bill her government has withdrawn, officials said today.</p><p align="justify">&quot;Except for three provisions and a few other minor changes, the language of the two bills is identical,&quot; a law department official said. </p><p align="justify">A senior Writers' bureaucrat said the legislative steps that the new bill must pass through will take up &quot;at least six to eight months&quot;.</p><p align="justify">Had the chief minister wanted to be armed with a bill immediately, she could have first pressed for presidential assent to the old bill - in limbo since its passage in 2009 - and then added the new provisions through amendments, law department officials said.</p><p align="justify">They said the amended bill could have been enacted in less than a month. &quot;But the chief minister is vehemently opposed to accepting a bill moved by the Left with minor amendments,&quot; a source said.</p><p align="justify">A copy of the West Bengal Protection of Interest of Depositors in Financial Establishments Bill, 2013, was circulated among MLAs today since the government plans to place it in the Assembly on April 30.</p><p align="justify">Officials said that after the Assembly passes it and the governor signs it, the new bill must be sent to the Union home ministry for clearance, then on to the Union finance ministry, and then to the Union law ministry before it reaches the President.</p><p align="justify">Although Mamata has requested President Pranab Mukherjee to fast-track the bill's clearance in Delhi, a senior IAS officer at Writers' said the due diligence cannot be hurried through. &quot;Even if everything is okay in the new bill, it will take at least six to eight months to get presidential assent,&quot; he said.</p><p align="justify">All this has prompted the Opposition charge that the state government is actually trying to shield Saradha by delaying a law against companies defrauding depositors.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The government could have persuaded the Centre to clear the bill our Left government had sent in 2009, but it didn't. Now a fresh legislation is being brought. That will delay action against the Saradha owner,&quot; CPM state secretary Biman Bose said.</p><p align="justify">Some lawyers have cited the possibility of legal challenges further delaying the new bill's enactment as it seeks retrospective application. &quot;If a commission set up by the government recommends action against a company or people attached with it, the bill will apply retrospectively to allow this,&quot; a government panel lawyer said.</p><p align="justify">This provision, in Clause 22(2), may expose the bill to legal challenge, said former law minister Rabilal Moitra. &quot;Retrospective effect cannot be given to a bill with penal provisions.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Officials said that if the old bill were enacted, its provisions would have applied from the day it was passed in 2009 and no retrospective effect would have been needed.</p><p align="justify"><em>PM stand</em></p><p align="justify">The Centre too is keeping up pressure. The Prime Minister today said &quot;unauthorised collection of deposits&quot; with promises of &quot;exorbitant rate of return... is something which has to be curbed&quot;. Officials said the PMO and finance ministry would monitor all actions against such practice. </p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 20622, 'title' => 'After dragging feet, dose of tinkering', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> <em>Calcutta: </em>Mamata Banerjee's zeal for a new anti-fraud bill could delay action against Saradha for months but has only a few differences with the old Left-sponsored bill her government has withdrawn, officials said today. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;Except for three provisions and a few other minor changes, the language of the two bills is identical,&quot; a law department official said. </p> <p align="justify"> A senior Writers' bureaucrat said the legislative steps that the new bill must pass through will take up &quot;at least six to eight months&quot;. </p> <p align="justify"> Had the chief minister wanted to be armed with a bill immediately, she could have first pressed for presidential assent to the old bill - in limbo since its passage in 2009 - and then added the new provisions through amendments, law department officials said. </p> <p align="justify"> They said the amended bill could have been enacted in less than a month. &quot;But the chief minister is vehemently opposed to accepting a bill moved by the Left with minor amendments,&quot; a source said. </p> <p align="justify"> A copy of the West Bengal Protection of Interest of Depositors in Financial Establishments Bill, 2013, was circulated among MLAs today since the government plans to place it in the Assembly on April 30. </p> <p align="justify"> Officials said that after the Assembly passes it and the governor signs it, the new bill must be sent to the Union home ministry for clearance, then on to the Union finance ministry, and then to the Union law ministry before it reaches the President. </p> <p align="justify"> Although Mamata has requested President Pranab Mukherjee to fast-track the bill's clearance in Delhi, a senior IAS officer at Writers' said the due diligence cannot be hurried through. &quot;Even if everything is okay in the new bill, it will take at least six to eight months to get presidential assent,&quot; he said. </p> <p align="justify"> All this has prompted the Opposition charge that the state government is actually trying to shield Saradha by delaying a law against companies defrauding depositors. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;The government could have persuaded the Centre to clear the bill our Left government had sent in 2009, but it didn't. Now a fresh legislation is being brought. That will delay action against the Saradha owner,&quot; CPM state secretary Biman Bose said. </p> <p align="justify"> Some lawyers have cited the possibility of legal challenges further delaying the new bill's enactment as it seeks retrospective application. &quot;If a commission set up by the government recommends action against a company or people attached with it, the bill will apply retrospectively to allow this,&quot; a government panel lawyer said. </p> <p align="justify"> This provision, in Clause 22(2), may expose the bill to legal challenge, said former law minister Rabilal Moitra. &quot;Retrospective effect cannot be given to a bill with penal provisions.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> Officials said that if the old bill were enacted, its provisions would have applied from the day it was passed in 2009 and no retrospective effect would have been needed. </p> <p align="justify"> <em>PM stand</em> </p> <p align="justify"> The Centre too is keeping up pressure. The Prime Minister today said &quot;unauthorised collection of deposits&quot; with promises of &quot;exorbitant rate of return... is something which has to be curbed&quot;. Officials said the PMO and finance ministry would monitor all actions against such practice. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 28 April, 2013, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1130428/jsp/frontpage/story_16836948.jsp#.UXzx-Urcing', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'after-dragging-feet-dose-of-tinkering-20764', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 20764, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 20622 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | After dragging feet, dose of tinkering' $metaKeywords = 'Saradha Group,Chit fund,Fraud,crime,Corporate Governance' $metaDesc = ' -The Telegraph Calcutta: Mamata Banerjee's zeal for a new anti-fraud bill could delay action against Saradha for months but has only a few differences with the old Left-sponsored bill her government has withdrawn, officials said today. &quot;Except for three provisions and a...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>Calcutta: </em>Mamata Banerjee's zeal for a new anti-fraud bill could delay action against Saradha for months but has only a few differences with the old Left-sponsored bill her government has withdrawn, officials said today.</p><p align="justify">&quot;Except for three provisions and a few other minor changes, the language of the two bills is identical,&quot; a law department official said. </p><p align="justify">A senior Writers' bureaucrat said the legislative steps that the new bill must pass through will take up &quot;at least six to eight months&quot;.</p><p align="justify">Had the chief minister wanted to be armed with a bill immediately, she could have first pressed for presidential assent to the old bill - in limbo since its passage in 2009 - and then added the new provisions through amendments, law department officials said.</p><p align="justify">They said the amended bill could have been enacted in less than a month. &quot;But the chief minister is vehemently opposed to accepting a bill moved by the Left with minor amendments,&quot; a source said.</p><p align="justify">A copy of the West Bengal Protection of Interest of Depositors in Financial Establishments Bill, 2013, was circulated among MLAs today since the government plans to place it in the Assembly on April 30.</p><p align="justify">Officials said that after the Assembly passes it and the governor signs it, the new bill must be sent to the Union home ministry for clearance, then on to the Union finance ministry, and then to the Union law ministry before it reaches the President.</p><p align="justify">Although Mamata has requested President Pranab Mukherjee to fast-track the bill's clearance in Delhi, a senior IAS officer at Writers' said the due diligence cannot be hurried through. &quot;Even if everything is okay in the new bill, it will take at least six to eight months to get presidential assent,&quot; he said.</p><p align="justify">All this has prompted the Opposition charge that the state government is actually trying to shield Saradha by delaying a law against companies defrauding depositors.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The government could have persuaded the Centre to clear the bill our Left government had sent in 2009, but it didn't. Now a fresh legislation is being brought. That will delay action against the Saradha owner,&quot; CPM state secretary Biman Bose said.</p><p align="justify">Some lawyers have cited the possibility of legal challenges further delaying the new bill's enactment as it seeks retrospective application. &quot;If a commission set up by the government recommends action against a company or people attached with it, the bill will apply retrospectively to allow this,&quot; a government panel lawyer said.</p><p align="justify">This provision, in Clause 22(2), may expose the bill to legal challenge, said former law minister Rabilal Moitra. &quot;Retrospective effect cannot be given to a bill with penal provisions.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Officials said that if the old bill were enacted, its provisions would have applied from the day it was passed in 2009 and no retrospective effect would have been needed.</p><p align="justify"><em>PM stand</em></p><p align="justify">The Centre too is keeping up pressure. The Prime Minister today said &quot;unauthorised collection of deposits&quot; with promises of &quot;exorbitant rate of return... is something which has to be curbed&quot;. Officials said the PMO and finance ministry would monitor all actions against such practice. </p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/after-dragging-feet-dose-of-tinkering-20764.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | After dragging feet, dose of tinkering | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Telegraph Calcutta: Mamata Banerjee's zeal for a new anti-fraud bill could delay action against Saradha for months but has only a few differences with the old Left-sponsored bill her government has withdrawn, officials said today. "Except for three provisions and a..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>After dragging feet, dose of tinkering</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>Calcutta: </em>Mamata Banerjee's zeal for a new anti-fraud bill could delay action against Saradha for months but has only a few differences with the old Left-sponsored bill her government has withdrawn, officials said today.</p><p align="justify">"Except for three provisions and a few other minor changes, the language of the two bills is identical," a law department official said. </p><p align="justify">A senior Writers' bureaucrat said the legislative steps that the new bill must pass through will take up "at least six to eight months".</p><p align="justify">Had the chief minister wanted to be armed with a bill immediately, she could have first pressed for presidential assent to the old bill - in limbo since its passage in 2009 - and then added the new provisions through amendments, law department officials said.</p><p align="justify">They said the amended bill could have been enacted in less than a month. "But the chief minister is vehemently opposed to accepting a bill moved by the Left with minor amendments," a source said.</p><p align="justify">A copy of the West Bengal Protection of Interest of Depositors in Financial Establishments Bill, 2013, was circulated among MLAs today since the government plans to place it in the Assembly on April 30.</p><p align="justify">Officials said that after the Assembly passes it and the governor signs it, the new bill must be sent to the Union home ministry for clearance, then on to the Union finance ministry, and then to the Union law ministry before it reaches the President.</p><p align="justify">Although Mamata has requested President Pranab Mukherjee to fast-track the bill's clearance in Delhi, a senior IAS officer at Writers' said the due diligence cannot be hurried through. "Even if everything is okay in the new bill, it will take at least six to eight months to get presidential assent," he said.</p><p align="justify">All this has prompted the Opposition charge that the state government is actually trying to shield Saradha by delaying a law against companies defrauding depositors.</p><p align="justify">"The government could have persuaded the Centre to clear the bill our Left government had sent in 2009, but it didn't. Now a fresh legislation is being brought. That will delay action against the Saradha owner," CPM state secretary Biman Bose said.</p><p align="justify">Some lawyers have cited the possibility of legal challenges further delaying the new bill's enactment as it seeks retrospective application. "If a commission set up by the government recommends action against a company or people attached with it, the bill will apply retrospectively to allow this," a government panel lawyer said.</p><p align="justify">This provision, in Clause 22(2), may expose the bill to legal challenge, said former law minister Rabilal Moitra. "Retrospective effect cannot be given to a bill with penal provisions."</p><p align="justify">Officials said that if the old bill were enacted, its provisions would have applied from the day it was passed in 2009 and no retrospective effect would have been needed.</p><p align="justify"><em>PM stand</em></p><p align="justify">The Centre too is keeping up pressure. The Prime Minister today said "unauthorised collection of deposits" with promises of "exorbitant rate of return... is something which has to be curbed". Officials said the PMO and finance ministry would monitor all actions against such practice. </p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68053fefc79ad-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68053fefc79ad-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68053fefc79ad-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68053fefc79ad-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68053fefc79ad-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68053fefc79ad-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68053fefc79ad-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68053fefc79ad-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68053fefc79ad-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 20622, 'title' => 'After dragging feet, dose of tinkering', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> <em>Calcutta: </em>Mamata Banerjee's zeal for a new anti-fraud bill could delay action against Saradha for months but has only a few differences with the old Left-sponsored bill her government has withdrawn, officials said today. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;Except for three provisions and a few other minor changes, the language of the two bills is identical,&quot; a law department official said. </p> <p align="justify"> A senior Writers' bureaucrat said the legislative steps that the new bill must pass through will take up &quot;at least six to eight months&quot;. </p> <p align="justify"> Had the chief minister wanted to be armed with a bill immediately, she could have first pressed for presidential assent to the old bill - in limbo since its passage in 2009 - and then added the new provisions through amendments, law department officials said. </p> <p align="justify"> They said the amended bill could have been enacted in less than a month. &quot;But the chief minister is vehemently opposed to accepting a bill moved by the Left with minor amendments,&quot; a source said. </p> <p align="justify"> A copy of the West Bengal Protection of Interest of Depositors in Financial Establishments Bill, 2013, was circulated among MLAs today since the government plans to place it in the Assembly on April 30. </p> <p align="justify"> Officials said that after the Assembly passes it and the governor signs it, the new bill must be sent to the Union home ministry for clearance, then on to the Union finance ministry, and then to the Union law ministry before it reaches the President. </p> <p align="justify"> Although Mamata has requested President Pranab Mukherjee to fast-track the bill's clearance in Delhi, a senior IAS officer at Writers' said the due diligence cannot be hurried through. &quot;Even if everything is okay in the new bill, it will take at least six to eight months to get presidential assent,&quot; he said. </p> <p align="justify"> All this has prompted the Opposition charge that the state government is actually trying to shield Saradha by delaying a law against companies defrauding depositors. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;The government could have persuaded the Centre to clear the bill our Left government had sent in 2009, but it didn't. Now a fresh legislation is being brought. That will delay action against the Saradha owner,&quot; CPM state secretary Biman Bose said. </p> <p align="justify"> Some lawyers have cited the possibility of legal challenges further delaying the new bill's enactment as it seeks retrospective application. &quot;If a commission set up by the government recommends action against a company or people attached with it, the bill will apply retrospectively to allow this,&quot; a government panel lawyer said. </p> <p align="justify"> This provision, in Clause 22(2), may expose the bill to legal challenge, said former law minister Rabilal Moitra. &quot;Retrospective effect cannot be given to a bill with penal provisions.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> Officials said that if the old bill were enacted, its provisions would have applied from the day it was passed in 2009 and no retrospective effect would have been needed. </p> <p align="justify"> <em>PM stand</em> </p> <p align="justify"> The Centre too is keeping up pressure. The Prime Minister today said &quot;unauthorised collection of deposits&quot; with promises of &quot;exorbitant rate of return... is something which has to be curbed&quot;. Officials said the PMO and finance ministry would monitor all actions against such practice. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 28 April, 2013, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1130428/jsp/frontpage/story_16836948.jsp#.UXzx-Urcing', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'after-dragging-feet-dose-of-tinkering-20764', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 20764, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 20622, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | After dragging feet, dose of tinkering', 'metaKeywords' => 'Saradha Group,Chit fund,Fraud,crime,Corporate Governance', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Telegraph Calcutta: Mamata Banerjee's zeal for a new anti-fraud bill could delay action against Saradha for months but has only a few differences with the old Left-sponsored bill her government has withdrawn, officials said today. &quot;Except for three provisions and a...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>Calcutta: </em>Mamata Banerjee's zeal for a new anti-fraud bill could delay action against Saradha for months but has only a few differences with the old Left-sponsored bill her government has withdrawn, officials said today.</p><p align="justify">&quot;Except for three provisions and a few other minor changes, the language of the two bills is identical,&quot; a law department official said. </p><p align="justify">A senior Writers' bureaucrat said the legislative steps that the new bill must pass through will take up &quot;at least six to eight months&quot;.</p><p align="justify">Had the chief minister wanted to be armed with a bill immediately, she could have first pressed for presidential assent to the old bill - in limbo since its passage in 2009 - and then added the new provisions through amendments, law department officials said.</p><p align="justify">They said the amended bill could have been enacted in less than a month. &quot;But the chief minister is vehemently opposed to accepting a bill moved by the Left with minor amendments,&quot; a source said.</p><p align="justify">A copy of the West Bengal Protection of Interest of Depositors in Financial Establishments Bill, 2013, was circulated among MLAs today since the government plans to place it in the Assembly on April 30.</p><p align="justify">Officials said that after the Assembly passes it and the governor signs it, the new bill must be sent to the Union home ministry for clearance, then on to the Union finance ministry, and then to the Union law ministry before it reaches the President.</p><p align="justify">Although Mamata has requested President Pranab Mukherjee to fast-track the bill's clearance in Delhi, a senior IAS officer at Writers' said the due diligence cannot be hurried through. &quot;Even if everything is okay in the new bill, it will take at least six to eight months to get presidential assent,&quot; he said.</p><p align="justify">All this has prompted the Opposition charge that the state government is actually trying to shield Saradha by delaying a law against companies defrauding depositors.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The government could have persuaded the Centre to clear the bill our Left government had sent in 2009, but it didn't. Now a fresh legislation is being brought. That will delay action against the Saradha owner,&quot; CPM state secretary Biman Bose said.</p><p align="justify">Some lawyers have cited the possibility of legal challenges further delaying the new bill's enactment as it seeks retrospective application. &quot;If a commission set up by the government recommends action against a company or people attached with it, the bill will apply retrospectively to allow this,&quot; a government panel lawyer said.</p><p align="justify">This provision, in Clause 22(2), may expose the bill to legal challenge, said former law minister Rabilal Moitra. &quot;Retrospective effect cannot be given to a bill with penal provisions.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Officials said that if the old bill were enacted, its provisions would have applied from the day it was passed in 2009 and no retrospective effect would have been needed.</p><p align="justify"><em>PM stand</em></p><p align="justify">The Centre too is keeping up pressure. The Prime Minister today said &quot;unauthorised collection of deposits&quot; with promises of &quot;exorbitant rate of return... is something which has to be curbed&quot;. Officials said the PMO and finance ministry would monitor all actions against such practice. </p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 20622, 'title' => 'After dragging feet, dose of tinkering', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> <em>Calcutta: </em>Mamata Banerjee's zeal for a new anti-fraud bill could delay action against Saradha for months but has only a few differences with the old Left-sponsored bill her government has withdrawn, officials said today. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;Except for three provisions and a few other minor changes, the language of the two bills is identical,&quot; a law department official said. </p> <p align="justify"> A senior Writers' bureaucrat said the legislative steps that the new bill must pass through will take up &quot;at least six to eight months&quot;. </p> <p align="justify"> Had the chief minister wanted to be armed with a bill immediately, she could have first pressed for presidential assent to the old bill - in limbo since its passage in 2009 - and then added the new provisions through amendments, law department officials said. </p> <p align="justify"> They said the amended bill could have been enacted in less than a month. &quot;But the chief minister is vehemently opposed to accepting a bill moved by the Left with minor amendments,&quot; a source said. </p> <p align="justify"> A copy of the West Bengal Protection of Interest of Depositors in Financial Establishments Bill, 2013, was circulated among MLAs today since the government plans to place it in the Assembly on April 30. </p> <p align="justify"> Officials said that after the Assembly passes it and the governor signs it, the new bill must be sent to the Union home ministry for clearance, then on to the Union finance ministry, and then to the Union law ministry before it reaches the President. </p> <p align="justify"> Although Mamata has requested President Pranab Mukherjee to fast-track the bill's clearance in Delhi, a senior IAS officer at Writers' said the due diligence cannot be hurried through. &quot;Even if everything is okay in the new bill, it will take at least six to eight months to get presidential assent,&quot; he said. </p> <p align="justify"> All this has prompted the Opposition charge that the state government is actually trying to shield Saradha by delaying a law against companies defrauding depositors. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;The government could have persuaded the Centre to clear the bill our Left government had sent in 2009, but it didn't. Now a fresh legislation is being brought. That will delay action against the Saradha owner,&quot; CPM state secretary Biman Bose said. </p> <p align="justify"> Some lawyers have cited the possibility of legal challenges further delaying the new bill's enactment as it seeks retrospective application. &quot;If a commission set up by the government recommends action against a company or people attached with it, the bill will apply retrospectively to allow this,&quot; a government panel lawyer said. </p> <p align="justify"> This provision, in Clause 22(2), may expose the bill to legal challenge, said former law minister Rabilal Moitra. &quot;Retrospective effect cannot be given to a bill with penal provisions.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> Officials said that if the old bill were enacted, its provisions would have applied from the day it was passed in 2009 and no retrospective effect would have been needed. </p> <p align="justify"> <em>PM stand</em> </p> <p align="justify"> The Centre too is keeping up pressure. The Prime Minister today said &quot;unauthorised collection of deposits&quot; with promises of &quot;exorbitant rate of return... is something which has to be curbed&quot;. Officials said the PMO and finance ministry would monitor all actions against such practice. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 28 April, 2013, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1130428/jsp/frontpage/story_16836948.jsp#.UXzx-Urcing', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'after-dragging-feet-dose-of-tinkering-20764', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 20764, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 20622 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | After dragging feet, dose of tinkering' $metaKeywords = 'Saradha Group,Chit fund,Fraud,crime,Corporate Governance' $metaDesc = ' -The Telegraph Calcutta: Mamata Banerjee's zeal for a new anti-fraud bill could delay action against Saradha for months but has only a few differences with the old Left-sponsored bill her government has withdrawn, officials said today. &quot;Except for three provisions and a...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>Calcutta: </em>Mamata Banerjee's zeal for a new anti-fraud bill could delay action against Saradha for months but has only a few differences with the old Left-sponsored bill her government has withdrawn, officials said today.</p><p align="justify">&quot;Except for three provisions and a few other minor changes, the language of the two bills is identical,&quot; a law department official said. </p><p align="justify">A senior Writers' bureaucrat said the legislative steps that the new bill must pass through will take up &quot;at least six to eight months&quot;.</p><p align="justify">Had the chief minister wanted to be armed with a bill immediately, she could have first pressed for presidential assent to the old bill - in limbo since its passage in 2009 - and then added the new provisions through amendments, law department officials said.</p><p align="justify">They said the amended bill could have been enacted in less than a month. &quot;But the chief minister is vehemently opposed to accepting a bill moved by the Left with minor amendments,&quot; a source said.</p><p align="justify">A copy of the West Bengal Protection of Interest of Depositors in Financial Establishments Bill, 2013, was circulated among MLAs today since the government plans to place it in the Assembly on April 30.</p><p align="justify">Officials said that after the Assembly passes it and the governor signs it, the new bill must be sent to the Union home ministry for clearance, then on to the Union finance ministry, and then to the Union law ministry before it reaches the President.</p><p align="justify">Although Mamata has requested President Pranab Mukherjee to fast-track the bill's clearance in Delhi, a senior IAS officer at Writers' said the due diligence cannot be hurried through. &quot;Even if everything is okay in the new bill, it will take at least six to eight months to get presidential assent,&quot; he said.</p><p align="justify">All this has prompted the Opposition charge that the state government is actually trying to shield Saradha by delaying a law against companies defrauding depositors.</p><p align="justify">&quot;The government could have persuaded the Centre to clear the bill our Left government had sent in 2009, but it didn't. Now a fresh legislation is being brought. That will delay action against the Saradha owner,&quot; CPM state secretary Biman Bose said.</p><p align="justify">Some lawyers have cited the possibility of legal challenges further delaying the new bill's enactment as it seeks retrospective application. &quot;If a commission set up by the government recommends action against a company or people attached with it, the bill will apply retrospectively to allow this,&quot; a government panel lawyer said.</p><p align="justify">This provision, in Clause 22(2), may expose the bill to legal challenge, said former law minister Rabilal Moitra. &quot;Retrospective effect cannot be given to a bill with penal provisions.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Officials said that if the old bill were enacted, its provisions would have applied from the day it was passed in 2009 and no retrospective effect would have been needed.</p><p align="justify"><em>PM stand</em></p><p align="justify">The Centre too is keeping up pressure. The Prime Minister today said &quot;unauthorised collection of deposits&quot; with promises of &quot;exorbitant rate of return... is something which has to be curbed&quot;. Officials said the PMO and finance ministry would monitor all actions against such practice. </p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/after-dragging-feet-dose-of-tinkering-20764.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | After dragging feet, dose of tinkering | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Telegraph Calcutta: Mamata Banerjee's zeal for a new anti-fraud bill could delay action against Saradha for months but has only a few differences with the old Left-sponsored bill her government has withdrawn, officials said today. "Except for three provisions and a..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>After dragging feet, dose of tinkering</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>Calcutta: </em>Mamata Banerjee's zeal for a new anti-fraud bill could delay action against Saradha for months but has only a few differences with the old Left-sponsored bill her government has withdrawn, officials said today.</p><p align="justify">"Except for three provisions and a few other minor changes, the language of the two bills is identical," a law department official said. </p><p align="justify">A senior Writers' bureaucrat said the legislative steps that the new bill must pass through will take up "at least six to eight months".</p><p align="justify">Had the chief minister wanted to be armed with a bill immediately, she could have first pressed for presidential assent to the old bill - in limbo since its passage in 2009 - and then added the new provisions through amendments, law department officials said.</p><p align="justify">They said the amended bill could have been enacted in less than a month. "But the chief minister is vehemently opposed to accepting a bill moved by the Left with minor amendments," a source said.</p><p align="justify">A copy of the West Bengal Protection of Interest of Depositors in Financial Establishments Bill, 2013, was circulated among MLAs today since the government plans to place it in the Assembly on April 30.</p><p align="justify">Officials said that after the Assembly passes it and the governor signs it, the new bill must be sent to the Union home ministry for clearance, then on to the Union finance ministry, and then to the Union law ministry before it reaches the President.</p><p align="justify">Although Mamata has requested President Pranab Mukherjee to fast-track the bill's clearance in Delhi, a senior IAS officer at Writers' said the due diligence cannot be hurried through. "Even if everything is okay in the new bill, it will take at least six to eight months to get presidential assent," he said.</p><p align="justify">All this has prompted the Opposition charge that the state government is actually trying to shield Saradha by delaying a law against companies defrauding depositors.</p><p align="justify">"The government could have persuaded the Centre to clear the bill our Left government had sent in 2009, but it didn't. Now a fresh legislation is being brought. That will delay action against the Saradha owner," CPM state secretary Biman Bose said.</p><p align="justify">Some lawyers have cited the possibility of legal challenges further delaying the new bill's enactment as it seeks retrospective application. "If a commission set up by the government recommends action against a company or people attached with it, the bill will apply retrospectively to allow this," a government panel lawyer said.</p><p align="justify">This provision, in Clause 22(2), may expose the bill to legal challenge, said former law minister Rabilal Moitra. "Retrospective effect cannot be given to a bill with penal provisions."</p><p align="justify">Officials said that if the old bill were enacted, its provisions would have applied from the day it was passed in 2009 and no retrospective effect would have been needed.</p><p align="justify"><em>PM stand</em></p><p align="justify">The Centre too is keeping up pressure. The Prime Minister today said "unauthorised collection of deposits" with promises of "exorbitant rate of return... is something which has to be curbed". Officials said the PMO and finance ministry would monitor all actions against such practice. </p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 20622, 'title' => 'After dragging feet, dose of tinkering', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> <em>Calcutta: </em>Mamata Banerjee's zeal for a new anti-fraud bill could delay action against Saradha for months but has only a few differences with the old Left-sponsored bill her government has withdrawn, officials said today. </p> <p align="justify"> "Except for three provisions and a few other minor changes, the language of the two bills is identical," a law department official said. </p> <p align="justify"> A senior Writers' bureaucrat said the legislative steps that the new bill must pass through will take up "at least six to eight months". </p> <p align="justify"> Had the chief minister wanted to be armed with a bill immediately, she could have first pressed for presidential assent to the old bill - in limbo since its passage in 2009 - and then added the new provisions through amendments, law department officials said. </p> <p align="justify"> They said the amended bill could have been enacted in less than a month. "But the chief minister is vehemently opposed to accepting a bill moved by the Left with minor amendments," a source said. </p> <p align="justify"> A copy of the West Bengal Protection of Interest of Depositors in Financial Establishments Bill, 2013, was circulated among MLAs today since the government plans to place it in the Assembly on April 30. </p> <p align="justify"> Officials said that after the Assembly passes it and the governor signs it, the new bill must be sent to the Union home ministry for clearance, then on to the Union finance ministry, and then to the Union law ministry before it reaches the President. </p> <p align="justify"> Although Mamata has requested President Pranab Mukherjee to fast-track the bill's clearance in Delhi, a senior IAS officer at Writers' said the due diligence cannot be hurried through. "Even if everything is okay in the new bill, it will take at least six to eight months to get presidential assent," he said. </p> <p align="justify"> All this has prompted the Opposition charge that the state government is actually trying to shield Saradha by delaying a law against companies defrauding depositors. </p> <p align="justify"> "The government could have persuaded the Centre to clear the bill our Left government had sent in 2009, but it didn't. Now a fresh legislation is being brought. That will delay action against the Saradha owner," CPM state secretary Biman Bose said. </p> <p align="justify"> Some lawyers have cited the possibility of legal challenges further delaying the new bill's enactment as it seeks retrospective application. "If a commission set up by the government recommends action against a company or people attached with it, the bill will apply retrospectively to allow this," a government panel lawyer said. </p> <p align="justify"> This provision, in Clause 22(2), may expose the bill to legal challenge, said former law minister Rabilal Moitra. "Retrospective effect cannot be given to a bill with penal provisions." </p> <p align="justify"> Officials said that if the old bill were enacted, its provisions would have applied from the day it was passed in 2009 and no retrospective effect would have been needed. </p> <p align="justify"> <em>PM stand</em> </p> <p align="justify"> The Centre too is keeping up pressure. The Prime Minister today said "unauthorised collection of deposits" with promises of "exorbitant rate of return... is something which has to be curbed". Officials said the PMO and finance ministry would monitor all actions against such practice. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 28 April, 2013, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1130428/jsp/frontpage/story_16836948.jsp#.UXzx-Urcing', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'after-dragging-feet-dose-of-tinkering-20764', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 20764, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 20622, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | After dragging feet, dose of tinkering', 'metaKeywords' => 'Saradha Group,Chit fund,Fraud,crime,Corporate Governance', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Telegraph Calcutta: Mamata Banerjee's zeal for a new anti-fraud bill could delay action against Saradha for months but has only a few differences with the old Left-sponsored bill her government has withdrawn, officials said today. "Except for three provisions and a...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>Calcutta: </em>Mamata Banerjee's zeal for a new anti-fraud bill could delay action against Saradha for months but has only a few differences with the old Left-sponsored bill her government has withdrawn, officials said today.</p><p align="justify">"Except for three provisions and a few other minor changes, the language of the two bills is identical," a law department official said. </p><p align="justify">A senior Writers' bureaucrat said the legislative steps that the new bill must pass through will take up "at least six to eight months".</p><p align="justify">Had the chief minister wanted to be armed with a bill immediately, she could have first pressed for presidential assent to the old bill - in limbo since its passage in 2009 - and then added the new provisions through amendments, law department officials said.</p><p align="justify">They said the amended bill could have been enacted in less than a month. "But the chief minister is vehemently opposed to accepting a bill moved by the Left with minor amendments," a source said.</p><p align="justify">A copy of the West Bengal Protection of Interest of Depositors in Financial Establishments Bill, 2013, was circulated among MLAs today since the government plans to place it in the Assembly on April 30.</p><p align="justify">Officials said that after the Assembly passes it and the governor signs it, the new bill must be sent to the Union home ministry for clearance, then on to the Union finance ministry, and then to the Union law ministry before it reaches the President.</p><p align="justify">Although Mamata has requested President Pranab Mukherjee to fast-track the bill's clearance in Delhi, a senior IAS officer at Writers' said the due diligence cannot be hurried through. "Even if everything is okay in the new bill, it will take at least six to eight months to get presidential assent," he said.</p><p align="justify">All this has prompted the Opposition charge that the state government is actually trying to shield Saradha by delaying a law against companies defrauding depositors.</p><p align="justify">"The government could have persuaded the Centre to clear the bill our Left government had sent in 2009, but it didn't. Now a fresh legislation is being brought. That will delay action against the Saradha owner," CPM state secretary Biman Bose said.</p><p align="justify">Some lawyers have cited the possibility of legal challenges further delaying the new bill's enactment as it seeks retrospective application. "If a commission set up by the government recommends action against a company or people attached with it, the bill will apply retrospectively to allow this," a government panel lawyer said.</p><p align="justify">This provision, in Clause 22(2), may expose the bill to legal challenge, said former law minister Rabilal Moitra. "Retrospective effect cannot be given to a bill with penal provisions."</p><p align="justify">Officials said that if the old bill were enacted, its provisions would have applied from the day it was passed in 2009 and no retrospective effect would have been needed.</p><p align="justify"><em>PM stand</em></p><p align="justify">The Centre too is keeping up pressure. The Prime Minister today said "unauthorised collection of deposits" with promises of "exorbitant rate of return... is something which has to be curbed". Officials said the PMO and finance ministry would monitor all actions against such practice. </p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 20622, 'title' => 'After dragging feet, dose of tinkering', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> <em>Calcutta: </em>Mamata Banerjee's zeal for a new anti-fraud bill could delay action against Saradha for months but has only a few differences with the old Left-sponsored bill her government has withdrawn, officials said today. </p> <p align="justify"> "Except for three provisions and a few other minor changes, the language of the two bills is identical," a law department official said. </p> <p align="justify"> A senior Writers' bureaucrat said the legislative steps that the new bill must pass through will take up "at least six to eight months". </p> <p align="justify"> Had the chief minister wanted to be armed with a bill immediately, she could have first pressed for presidential assent to the old bill - in limbo since its passage in 2009 - and then added the new provisions through amendments, law department officials said. </p> <p align="justify"> They said the amended bill could have been enacted in less than a month. "But the chief minister is vehemently opposed to accepting a bill moved by the Left with minor amendments," a source said. </p> <p align="justify"> A copy of the West Bengal Protection of Interest of Depositors in Financial Establishments Bill, 2013, was circulated among MLAs today since the government plans to place it in the Assembly on April 30. </p> <p align="justify"> Officials said that after the Assembly passes it and the governor signs it, the new bill must be sent to the Union home ministry for clearance, then on to the Union finance ministry, and then to the Union law ministry before it reaches the President. </p> <p align="justify"> Although Mamata has requested President Pranab Mukherjee to fast-track the bill's clearance in Delhi, a senior IAS officer at Writers' said the due diligence cannot be hurried through. "Even if everything is okay in the new bill, it will take at least six to eight months to get presidential assent," he said. </p> <p align="justify"> All this has prompted the Opposition charge that the state government is actually trying to shield Saradha by delaying a law against companies defrauding depositors. </p> <p align="justify"> "The government could have persuaded the Centre to clear the bill our Left government had sent in 2009, but it didn't. Now a fresh legislation is being brought. That will delay action against the Saradha owner," CPM state secretary Biman Bose said. </p> <p align="justify"> Some lawyers have cited the possibility of legal challenges further delaying the new bill's enactment as it seeks retrospective application. "If a commission set up by the government recommends action against a company or people attached with it, the bill will apply retrospectively to allow this," a government panel lawyer said. </p> <p align="justify"> This provision, in Clause 22(2), may expose the bill to legal challenge, said former law minister Rabilal Moitra. "Retrospective effect cannot be given to a bill with penal provisions." </p> <p align="justify"> Officials said that if the old bill were enacted, its provisions would have applied from the day it was passed in 2009 and no retrospective effect would have been needed. </p> <p align="justify"> <em>PM stand</em> </p> <p align="justify"> The Centre too is keeping up pressure. The Prime Minister today said "unauthorised collection of deposits" with promises of "exorbitant rate of return... is something which has to be curbed". Officials said the PMO and finance ministry would monitor all actions against such practice. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 28 April, 2013, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1130428/jsp/frontpage/story_16836948.jsp#.UXzx-Urcing', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'after-dragging-feet-dose-of-tinkering-20764', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 20764, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 20622 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | After dragging feet, dose of tinkering' $metaKeywords = 'Saradha Group,Chit fund,Fraud,crime,Corporate Governance' $metaDesc = ' -The Telegraph Calcutta: Mamata Banerjee's zeal for a new anti-fraud bill could delay action against Saradha for months but has only a few differences with the old Left-sponsored bill her government has withdrawn, officials said today. "Except for three provisions and a...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>Calcutta: </em>Mamata Banerjee's zeal for a new anti-fraud bill could delay action against Saradha for months but has only a few differences with the old Left-sponsored bill her government has withdrawn, officials said today.</p><p align="justify">"Except for three provisions and a few other minor changes, the language of the two bills is identical," a law department official said. </p><p align="justify">A senior Writers' bureaucrat said the legislative steps that the new bill must pass through will take up "at least six to eight months".</p><p align="justify">Had the chief minister wanted to be armed with a bill immediately, she could have first pressed for presidential assent to the old bill - in limbo since its passage in 2009 - and then added the new provisions through amendments, law department officials said.</p><p align="justify">They said the amended bill could have been enacted in less than a month. "But the chief minister is vehemently opposed to accepting a bill moved by the Left with minor amendments," a source said.</p><p align="justify">A copy of the West Bengal Protection of Interest of Depositors in Financial Establishments Bill, 2013, was circulated among MLAs today since the government plans to place it in the Assembly on April 30.</p><p align="justify">Officials said that after the Assembly passes it and the governor signs it, the new bill must be sent to the Union home ministry for clearance, then on to the Union finance ministry, and then to the Union law ministry before it reaches the President.</p><p align="justify">Although Mamata has requested President Pranab Mukherjee to fast-track the bill's clearance in Delhi, a senior IAS officer at Writers' said the due diligence cannot be hurried through. "Even if everything is okay in the new bill, it will take at least six to eight months to get presidential assent," he said.</p><p align="justify">All this has prompted the Opposition charge that the state government is actually trying to shield Saradha by delaying a law against companies defrauding depositors.</p><p align="justify">"The government could have persuaded the Centre to clear the bill our Left government had sent in 2009, but it didn't. Now a fresh legislation is being brought. That will delay action against the Saradha owner," CPM state secretary Biman Bose said.</p><p align="justify">Some lawyers have cited the possibility of legal challenges further delaying the new bill's enactment as it seeks retrospective application. "If a commission set up by the government recommends action against a company or people attached with it, the bill will apply retrospectively to allow this," a government panel lawyer said.</p><p align="justify">This provision, in Clause 22(2), may expose the bill to legal challenge, said former law minister Rabilal Moitra. "Retrospective effect cannot be given to a bill with penal provisions."</p><p align="justify">Officials said that if the old bill were enacted, its provisions would have applied from the day it was passed in 2009 and no retrospective effect would have been needed.</p><p align="justify"><em>PM stand</em></p><p align="justify">The Centre too is keeping up pressure. The Prime Minister today said "unauthorised collection of deposits" with promises of "exorbitant rate of return... is something which has to be curbed". Officials said the PMO and finance ministry would monitor all actions against such practice. </p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
After dragging feet, dose of tinkering |
-The Telegraph
"Except for three provisions and a few other minor changes, the language of the two bills is identical," a law department official said. A senior Writers' bureaucrat said the legislative steps that the new bill must pass through will take up "at least six to eight months". Had the chief minister wanted to be armed with a bill immediately, she could have first pressed for presidential assent to the old bill - in limbo since its passage in 2009 - and then added the new provisions through amendments, law department officials said. They said the amended bill could have been enacted in less than a month. "But the chief minister is vehemently opposed to accepting a bill moved by the Left with minor amendments," a source said. A copy of the West Bengal Protection of Interest of Depositors in Financial Establishments Bill, 2013, was circulated among MLAs today since the government plans to place it in the Assembly on April 30. Officials said that after the Assembly passes it and the governor signs it, the new bill must be sent to the Union home ministry for clearance, then on to the Union finance ministry, and then to the Union law ministry before it reaches the President. Although Mamata has requested President Pranab Mukherjee to fast-track the bill's clearance in Delhi, a senior IAS officer at Writers' said the due diligence cannot be hurried through. "Even if everything is okay in the new bill, it will take at least six to eight months to get presidential assent," he said. All this has prompted the Opposition charge that the state government is actually trying to shield Saradha by delaying a law against companies defrauding depositors. "The government could have persuaded the Centre to clear the bill our Left government had sent in 2009, but it didn't. Now a fresh legislation is being brought. That will delay action against the Saradha owner," CPM state secretary Biman Bose said. Some lawyers have cited the possibility of legal challenges further delaying the new bill's enactment as it seeks retrospective application. "If a commission set up by the government recommends action against a company or people attached with it, the bill will apply retrospectively to allow this," a government panel lawyer said. This provision, in Clause 22(2), may expose the bill to legal challenge, said former law minister Rabilal Moitra. "Retrospective effect cannot be given to a bill with penal provisions." Officials said that if the old bill were enacted, its provisions would have applied from the day it was passed in 2009 and no retrospective effect would have been needed. PM stand The Centre too is keeping up pressure. The Prime Minister today said "unauthorised collection of deposits" with promises of "exorbitant rate of return... is something which has to be curbed". Officials said the PMO and finance ministry would monitor all actions against such practice. |