Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/amri-victims-seek-damages-4675206/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/amri-victims-seek-damages-4675206/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/amri-victims-seek-damages-4675206/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/amri-victims-seek-damages-4675206/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fa3f60a60be-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fa3f60a60be-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67fa3f60a60be-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fa3f60a60be-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fa3f60a60be-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fa3f60a60be-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fa3f60a60be-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67fa3f60a60be-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67fa3f60a60be-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 27158,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;AMRI victims seek damages&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;Survivors and family members of the 93 people killed in the fire at Calcutta&#039;s AMRI hospital in 2011 have moved the Supreme Court seeking compensation between Rs 7 crore and Rs 9 crore each.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
A bench of Justices S.J. Mukhopadhaya and A.M. Sapre yesterday issued notices to AMRI on the application moved by the victims, led by Paromita Guha Thakurta and others, challenging a National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission judgment of November 17, 2014, that had dismissed their plea on grounds of &amp;quot;exaggerated&amp;quot; claims.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The apex court sought the response after counsel Vikramjit Banerjee, appearing for the victims, said the NCDRC had erroneously dismissed their plea without giving the appellants an opportunity to substantiate their case.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
About 15 survivors and family members of the dead had moved the NCDRC for the compensation.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In their petition before the apex court, the applicants said most of those who lost their lives in the fire were the sole breadwinners of their families and that some of the victims were elderly citizens.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The petition said the hospital management was solely responsible for the loss of lives because the fire started in the annexe building that was meant to be used as a parking lot but had been converted into a storage space where combustible items such as chemical waste, diesel, oxygen cylinders and cotton were stored.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
It recalled that the apex court in the Charan Singh v. Healing Touch Hospital &amp;amp; Others case in 2000 had ruled that &amp;quot;whether the claim of the appellant was &#039;realistic&#039;, &#039;exaggerated&#039; or &#039;excessive&#039; could only have been determined after the appellant had been given an opportunity to prove the case he had set up and established his claim under various heads. It was not fair to call his claim &#039;unrealistic&#039;.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Hence, the petitioners contended, the NCDRC should not have dismissed their claims.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The NCDRC had said in its order: &amp;quot;It is significant to note that irrespective of the age of the deceased/victim, their financial status etc., all the complainants have claimed almost the same amount of compensation, ranging between 7,00,00,000 to 9,00,00,000/under identical heads.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 1 February, 2015, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1150201/jsp/nation/story_11023.jsp#.VM42KS7xxpA&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;amri-victims-seek-damages-4675206&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4675206,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 27158,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | AMRI victims seek damages&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Consumer Rights,Hospital,Human Rights,Law and Justice&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Telegraph


New Delhi: Survivors and family members of the 93 people killed in the fire at Calcutta&#039;s AMRI hospital in 2011 have moved the Supreme Court seeking compensation between Rs 7 crore and Rs 9 crore each.


A bench of Justices...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;Survivors and family members of the 93 people killed in the fire at Calcutta&#039;s AMRI hospital in 2011 have moved the Supreme Court seeking compensation between Rs 7 crore and Rs 9 crore each.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;A bench of Justices S.J. Mukhopadhaya and A.M. Sapre yesterday issued notices to AMRI on the application moved by the victims, led by Paromita Guha Thakurta and others, challenging a National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission judgment of November 17, 2014, that had dismissed their plea on grounds of &amp;quot;exaggerated&amp;quot; claims.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The apex court sought the response after counsel Vikramjit Banerjee, appearing for the victims, said the NCDRC had erroneously dismissed their plea without giving the appellants an opportunity to substantiate their case.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;About 15 survivors and family members of the dead had moved the NCDRC for the compensation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In their petition before the apex court, the applicants said most of those who lost their lives in the fire were the sole breadwinners of their families and that some of the victims were elderly citizens.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The petition said the hospital management was solely responsible for the loss of lives because the fire started in the annexe building that was meant to be used as a parking lot but had been converted into a storage space where combustible items such as chemical waste, diesel, oxygen cylinders and cotton were stored.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;It recalled that the apex court in the Charan Singh v. Healing Touch Hospital &amp;amp; Others case in 2000 had ruled that &amp;quot;whether the claim of the appellant was &#039;realistic&#039;, &#039;exaggerated&#039; or &#039;excessive&#039; could only have been determined after the appellant had been given an opportunity to prove the case he had set up and established his claim under various heads. It was not fair to call his claim &#039;unrealistic&#039;.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Hence, the petitioners contended, the NCDRC should not have dismissed their claims.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The NCDRC had said in its order: &amp;quot;It is significant to note that irrespective of the age of the deceased/victim, their financial status etc., all the complainants have claimed almost the same amount of compensation, ranging between 7,00,00,000 to 9,00,00,000/under identical heads.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 27158,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;AMRI victims seek damages&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;Survivors and family members of the 93 people killed in the fire at Calcutta&#039;s AMRI hospital in 2011 have moved the Supreme Court seeking compensation between Rs 7 crore and Rs 9 crore each.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
A bench of Justices S.J. Mukhopadhaya and A.M. Sapre yesterday issued notices to AMRI on the application moved by the victims, led by Paromita Guha Thakurta and others, challenging a National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission judgment of November 17, 2014, that had dismissed their plea on grounds of &amp;quot;exaggerated&amp;quot; claims.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The apex court sought the response after counsel Vikramjit Banerjee, appearing for the victims, said the NCDRC had erroneously dismissed their plea without giving the appellants an opportunity to substantiate their case.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
About 15 survivors and family members of the dead had moved the NCDRC for the compensation.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In their petition before the apex court, the applicants said most of those who lost their lives in the fire were the sole breadwinners of their families and that some of the victims were elderly citizens.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The petition said the hospital management was solely responsible for the loss of lives because the fire started in the annexe building that was meant to be used as a parking lot but had been converted into a storage space where combustible items such as chemical waste, diesel, oxygen cylinders and cotton were stored.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
It recalled that the apex court in the Charan Singh v. Healing Touch Hospital &amp;amp; Others case in 2000 had ruled that &amp;quot;whether the claim of the appellant was &#039;realistic&#039;, &#039;exaggerated&#039; or &#039;excessive&#039; could only have been determined after the appellant had been given an opportunity to prove the case he had set up and established his claim under various heads. It was not fair to call his claim &#039;unrealistic&#039;.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Hence, the petitioners contended, the NCDRC should not have dismissed their claims.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The NCDRC had said in its order: &amp;quot;It is significant to note that irrespective of the age of the deceased/victim, their financial status etc., all the complainants have claimed almost the same amount of compensation, ranging between 7,00,00,000 to 9,00,00,000/under identical heads.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 1 February, 2015, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1150201/jsp/nation/story_11023.jsp#.VM42KS7xxpA&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;amri-victims-seek-damages-4675206&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4675206,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 27158
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | AMRI victims seek damages&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Consumer Rights,Hospital,Human Rights,Law and Justice&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Telegraph


New Delhi: Survivors and family members of the 93 people killed in the fire at Calcutta&#039;s AMRI hospital in 2011 have moved the Supreme Court seeking compensation between Rs 7 crore and Rs 9 crore each.


A bench of Justices...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;Survivors and family members of the 93 people killed in the fire at Calcutta&#039;s AMRI hospital in 2011 have moved the Supreme Court seeking compensation between Rs 7 crore and Rs 9 crore each.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;A bench of Justices S.J. Mukhopadhaya and A.M. Sapre yesterday issued notices to AMRI on the application moved by the victims, led by Paromita Guha Thakurta and others, challenging a National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission judgment of November 17, 2014, that had dismissed their plea on grounds of &amp;quot;exaggerated&amp;quot; claims.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The apex court sought the response after counsel Vikramjit Banerjee, appearing for the victims, said the NCDRC had erroneously dismissed their plea without giving the appellants an opportunity to substantiate their case.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;About 15 survivors and family members of the dead had moved the NCDRC for the compensation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In their petition before the apex court, the applicants said most of those who lost their lives in the fire were the sole breadwinners of their families and that some of the victims were elderly citizens.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The petition said the hospital management was solely responsible for the loss of lives because the fire started in the annexe building that was meant to be used as a parking lot but had been converted into a storage space where combustible items such as chemical waste, diesel, oxygen cylinders and cotton were stored.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;It recalled that the apex court in the Charan Singh v. Healing Touch Hospital &amp;amp; Others case in 2000 had ruled that &amp;quot;whether the claim of the appellant was &#039;realistic&#039;, &#039;exaggerated&#039; or &#039;excessive&#039; could only have been determined after the appellant had been given an opportunity to prove the case he had set up and established his claim under various heads. It was not fair to call his claim &#039;unrealistic&#039;.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Hence, the petitioners contended, the NCDRC should not have dismissed their claims.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The NCDRC had said in its order: &amp;quot;It is significant to note that irrespective of the age of the deceased/victim, their financial status etc., all the complainants have claimed almost the same amount of compensation, ranging between 7,00,00,000 to 9,00,00,000/under identical heads.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/amri-victims-seek-damages-4675206.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | AMRI victims seek damages | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Telegraph


New Delhi: Survivors and family members of the 93 people killed in the fire at Calcutta's AMRI hospital in 2011 have moved the Supreme Court seeking compensation between Rs 7 crore and Rs 9 crore each.


A bench of Justices..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>AMRI victims seek damages</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><em>New Delhi: </em>Survivors and family members of the 93 people killed in the fire at Calcutta's AMRI hospital in 2011 have moved the Supreme Court seeking compensation between Rs 7 crore and Rs 9 crore each.</p><p align="justify">A bench of Justices S.J. Mukhopadhaya and A.M. Sapre yesterday issued notices to AMRI on the application moved by the victims, led by Paromita Guha Thakurta and others, challenging a National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission judgment of November 17, 2014, that had dismissed their plea on grounds of &quot;exaggerated&quot; claims.</p><p align="justify">The apex court sought the response after counsel Vikramjit Banerjee, appearing for the victims, said the NCDRC had erroneously dismissed their plea without giving the appellants an opportunity to substantiate their case.</p><p align="justify">About 15 survivors and family members of the dead had moved the NCDRC for the compensation.</p><p align="justify">In their petition before the apex court, the applicants said most of those who lost their lives in the fire were the sole breadwinners of their families and that some of the victims were elderly citizens.</p><p align="justify">The petition said the hospital management was solely responsible for the loss of lives because the fire started in the annexe building that was meant to be used as a parking lot but had been converted into a storage space where combustible items such as chemical waste, diesel, oxygen cylinders and cotton were stored.</p><p align="justify">It recalled that the apex court in the Charan Singh v. Healing Touch Hospital &amp; Others case in 2000 had ruled that &quot;whether the claim of the appellant was 'realistic', 'exaggerated' or 'excessive' could only have been determined after the appellant had been given an opportunity to prove the case he had set up and established his claim under various heads. It was not fair to call his claim 'unrealistic'.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Hence, the petitioners contended, the NCDRC should not have dismissed their claims.</p><p align="justify">The NCDRC had said in its order: &quot;It is significant to note that irrespective of the age of the deceased/victim, their financial status etc., all the complainants have claimed almost the same amount of compensation, ranging between 7,00,00,000 to 9,00,00,000/under identical heads.&quot;</p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fa3f60a60be-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fa3f60a60be-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67fa3f60a60be-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fa3f60a60be-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fa3f60a60be-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fa3f60a60be-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fa3f60a60be-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67fa3f60a60be-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67fa3f60a60be-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 27158,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;AMRI victims seek damages&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;Survivors and family members of the 93 people killed in the fire at Calcutta&#039;s AMRI hospital in 2011 have moved the Supreme Court seeking compensation between Rs 7 crore and Rs 9 crore each.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
A bench of Justices S.J. Mukhopadhaya and A.M. Sapre yesterday issued notices to AMRI on the application moved by the victims, led by Paromita Guha Thakurta and others, challenging a National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission judgment of November 17, 2014, that had dismissed their plea on grounds of &amp;quot;exaggerated&amp;quot; claims.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The apex court sought the response after counsel Vikramjit Banerjee, appearing for the victims, said the NCDRC had erroneously dismissed their plea without giving the appellants an opportunity to substantiate their case.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
About 15 survivors and family members of the dead had moved the NCDRC for the compensation.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In their petition before the apex court, the applicants said most of those who lost their lives in the fire were the sole breadwinners of their families and that some of the victims were elderly citizens.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The petition said the hospital management was solely responsible for the loss of lives because the fire started in the annexe building that was meant to be used as a parking lot but had been converted into a storage space where combustible items such as chemical waste, diesel, oxygen cylinders and cotton were stored.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
It recalled that the apex court in the Charan Singh v. Healing Touch Hospital &amp;amp; Others case in 2000 had ruled that &amp;quot;whether the claim of the appellant was &#039;realistic&#039;, &#039;exaggerated&#039; or &#039;excessive&#039; could only have been determined after the appellant had been given an opportunity to prove the case he had set up and established his claim under various heads. It was not fair to call his claim &#039;unrealistic&#039;.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Hence, the petitioners contended, the NCDRC should not have dismissed their claims.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The NCDRC had said in its order: &amp;quot;It is significant to note that irrespective of the age of the deceased/victim, their financial status etc., all the complainants have claimed almost the same amount of compensation, ranging between 7,00,00,000 to 9,00,00,000/under identical heads.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 1 February, 2015, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1150201/jsp/nation/story_11023.jsp#.VM42KS7xxpA&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;amri-victims-seek-damages-4675206&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4675206,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 27158,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | AMRI victims seek damages&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Consumer Rights,Hospital,Human Rights,Law and Justice&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Telegraph


New Delhi: Survivors and family members of the 93 people killed in the fire at Calcutta&#039;s AMRI hospital in 2011 have moved the Supreme Court seeking compensation between Rs 7 crore and Rs 9 crore each.


A bench of Justices...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;Survivors and family members of the 93 people killed in the fire at Calcutta&#039;s AMRI hospital in 2011 have moved the Supreme Court seeking compensation between Rs 7 crore and Rs 9 crore each.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;A bench of Justices S.J. Mukhopadhaya and A.M. Sapre yesterday issued notices to AMRI on the application moved by the victims, led by Paromita Guha Thakurta and others, challenging a National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission judgment of November 17, 2014, that had dismissed their plea on grounds of &amp;quot;exaggerated&amp;quot; claims.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The apex court sought the response after counsel Vikramjit Banerjee, appearing for the victims, said the NCDRC had erroneously dismissed their plea without giving the appellants an opportunity to substantiate their case.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;About 15 survivors and family members of the dead had moved the NCDRC for the compensation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In their petition before the apex court, the applicants said most of those who lost their lives in the fire were the sole breadwinners of their families and that some of the victims were elderly citizens.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The petition said the hospital management was solely responsible for the loss of lives because the fire started in the annexe building that was meant to be used as a parking lot but had been converted into a storage space where combustible items such as chemical waste, diesel, oxygen cylinders and cotton were stored.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;It recalled that the apex court in the Charan Singh v. Healing Touch Hospital &amp;amp; Others case in 2000 had ruled that &amp;quot;whether the claim of the appellant was &#039;realistic&#039;, &#039;exaggerated&#039; or &#039;excessive&#039; could only have been determined after the appellant had been given an opportunity to prove the case he had set up and established his claim under various heads. It was not fair to call his claim &#039;unrealistic&#039;.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Hence, the petitioners contended, the NCDRC should not have dismissed their claims.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The NCDRC had said in its order: &amp;quot;It is significant to note that irrespective of the age of the deceased/victim, their financial status etc., all the complainants have claimed almost the same amount of compensation, ranging between 7,00,00,000 to 9,00,00,000/under identical heads.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 27158,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;AMRI victims seek damages&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;Survivors and family members of the 93 people killed in the fire at Calcutta&#039;s AMRI hospital in 2011 have moved the Supreme Court seeking compensation between Rs 7 crore and Rs 9 crore each.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
A bench of Justices S.J. Mukhopadhaya and A.M. Sapre yesterday issued notices to AMRI on the application moved by the victims, led by Paromita Guha Thakurta and others, challenging a National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission judgment of November 17, 2014, that had dismissed their plea on grounds of &amp;quot;exaggerated&amp;quot; claims.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The apex court sought the response after counsel Vikramjit Banerjee, appearing for the victims, said the NCDRC had erroneously dismissed their plea without giving the appellants an opportunity to substantiate their case.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
About 15 survivors and family members of the dead had moved the NCDRC for the compensation.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In their petition before the apex court, the applicants said most of those who lost their lives in the fire were the sole breadwinners of their families and that some of the victims were elderly citizens.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The petition said the hospital management was solely responsible for the loss of lives because the fire started in the annexe building that was meant to be used as a parking lot but had been converted into a storage space where combustible items such as chemical waste, diesel, oxygen cylinders and cotton were stored.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
It recalled that the apex court in the Charan Singh v. Healing Touch Hospital &amp;amp; Others case in 2000 had ruled that &amp;quot;whether the claim of the appellant was &#039;realistic&#039;, &#039;exaggerated&#039; or &#039;excessive&#039; could only have been determined after the appellant had been given an opportunity to prove the case he had set up and established his claim under various heads. It was not fair to call his claim &#039;unrealistic&#039;.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Hence, the petitioners contended, the NCDRC should not have dismissed their claims.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The NCDRC had said in its order: &amp;quot;It is significant to note that irrespective of the age of the deceased/victim, their financial status etc., all the complainants have claimed almost the same amount of compensation, ranging between 7,00,00,000 to 9,00,00,000/under identical heads.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 1 February, 2015, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1150201/jsp/nation/story_11023.jsp#.VM42KS7xxpA&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;amri-victims-seek-damages-4675206&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4675206,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 27158
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | AMRI victims seek damages&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Consumer Rights,Hospital,Human Rights,Law and Justice&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Telegraph


New Delhi: Survivors and family members of the 93 people killed in the fire at Calcutta&#039;s AMRI hospital in 2011 have moved the Supreme Court seeking compensation between Rs 7 crore and Rs 9 crore each.


A bench of Justices...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;Survivors and family members of the 93 people killed in the fire at Calcutta&#039;s AMRI hospital in 2011 have moved the Supreme Court seeking compensation between Rs 7 crore and Rs 9 crore each.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;A bench of Justices S.J. Mukhopadhaya and A.M. Sapre yesterday issued notices to AMRI on the application moved by the victims, led by Paromita Guha Thakurta and others, challenging a National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission judgment of November 17, 2014, that had dismissed their plea on grounds of &amp;quot;exaggerated&amp;quot; claims.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The apex court sought the response after counsel Vikramjit Banerjee, appearing for the victims, said the NCDRC had erroneously dismissed their plea without giving the appellants an opportunity to substantiate their case.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;About 15 survivors and family members of the dead had moved the NCDRC for the compensation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In their petition before the apex court, the applicants said most of those who lost their lives in the fire were the sole breadwinners of their families and that some of the victims were elderly citizens.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The petition said the hospital management was solely responsible for the loss of lives because the fire started in the annexe building that was meant to be used as a parking lot but had been converted into a storage space where combustible items such as chemical waste, diesel, oxygen cylinders and cotton were stored.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;It recalled that the apex court in the Charan Singh v. Healing Touch Hospital &amp;amp; Others case in 2000 had ruled that &amp;quot;whether the claim of the appellant was &#039;realistic&#039;, &#039;exaggerated&#039; or &#039;excessive&#039; could only have been determined after the appellant had been given an opportunity to prove the case he had set up and established his claim under various heads. It was not fair to call his claim &#039;unrealistic&#039;.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Hence, the petitioners contended, the NCDRC should not have dismissed their claims.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The NCDRC had said in its order: &amp;quot;It is significant to note that irrespective of the age of the deceased/victim, their financial status etc., all the complainants have claimed almost the same amount of compensation, ranging between 7,00,00,000 to 9,00,00,000/under identical heads.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/amri-victims-seek-damages-4675206.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | AMRI victims seek damages | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Telegraph


New Delhi: Survivors and family members of the 93 people killed in the fire at Calcutta's AMRI hospital in 2011 have moved the Supreme Court seeking compensation between Rs 7 crore and Rs 9 crore each.


A bench of Justices..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>AMRI victims seek damages</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><em>New Delhi: </em>Survivors and family members of the 93 people killed in the fire at Calcutta's AMRI hospital in 2011 have moved the Supreme Court seeking compensation between Rs 7 crore and Rs 9 crore each.</p><p align="justify">A bench of Justices S.J. Mukhopadhaya and A.M. Sapre yesterday issued notices to AMRI on the application moved by the victims, led by Paromita Guha Thakurta and others, challenging a National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission judgment of November 17, 2014, that had dismissed their plea on grounds of &quot;exaggerated&quot; claims.</p><p align="justify">The apex court sought the response after counsel Vikramjit Banerjee, appearing for the victims, said the NCDRC had erroneously dismissed their plea without giving the appellants an opportunity to substantiate their case.</p><p align="justify">About 15 survivors and family members of the dead had moved the NCDRC for the compensation.</p><p align="justify">In their petition before the apex court, the applicants said most of those who lost their lives in the fire were the sole breadwinners of their families and that some of the victims were elderly citizens.</p><p align="justify">The petition said the hospital management was solely responsible for the loss of lives because the fire started in the annexe building that was meant to be used as a parking lot but had been converted into a storage space where combustible items such as chemical waste, diesel, oxygen cylinders and cotton were stored.</p><p align="justify">It recalled that the apex court in the Charan Singh v. Healing Touch Hospital &amp; Others case in 2000 had ruled that &quot;whether the claim of the appellant was 'realistic', 'exaggerated' or 'excessive' could only have been determined after the appellant had been given an opportunity to prove the case he had set up and established his claim under various heads. It was not fair to call his claim 'unrealistic'.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Hence, the petitioners contended, the NCDRC should not have dismissed their claims.</p><p align="justify">The NCDRC had said in its order: &quot;It is significant to note that irrespective of the age of the deceased/victim, their financial status etc., all the complainants have claimed almost the same amount of compensation, ranging between 7,00,00,000 to 9,00,00,000/under identical heads.&quot;</p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fa3f60a60be-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fa3f60a60be-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67fa3f60a60be-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fa3f60a60be-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fa3f60a60be-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67fa3f60a60be-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67fa3f60a60be-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67fa3f60a60be-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67fa3f60a60be-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 27158,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;AMRI victims seek damages&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;Survivors and family members of the 93 people killed in the fire at Calcutta&#039;s AMRI hospital in 2011 have moved the Supreme Court seeking compensation between Rs 7 crore and Rs 9 crore each.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
A bench of Justices S.J. Mukhopadhaya and A.M. Sapre yesterday issued notices to AMRI on the application moved by the victims, led by Paromita Guha Thakurta and others, challenging a National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission judgment of November 17, 2014, that had dismissed their plea on grounds of &amp;quot;exaggerated&amp;quot; claims.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The apex court sought the response after counsel Vikramjit Banerjee, appearing for the victims, said the NCDRC had erroneously dismissed their plea without giving the appellants an opportunity to substantiate their case.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
About 15 survivors and family members of the dead had moved the NCDRC for the compensation.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In their petition before the apex court, the applicants said most of those who lost their lives in the fire were the sole breadwinners of their families and that some of the victims were elderly citizens.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The petition said the hospital management was solely responsible for the loss of lives because the fire started in the annexe building that was meant to be used as a parking lot but had been converted into a storage space where combustible items such as chemical waste, diesel, oxygen cylinders and cotton were stored.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
It recalled that the apex court in the Charan Singh v. Healing Touch Hospital &amp;amp; Others case in 2000 had ruled that &amp;quot;whether the claim of the appellant was &#039;realistic&#039;, &#039;exaggerated&#039; or &#039;excessive&#039; could only have been determined after the appellant had been given an opportunity to prove the case he had set up and established his claim under various heads. It was not fair to call his claim &#039;unrealistic&#039;.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Hence, the petitioners contended, the NCDRC should not have dismissed their claims.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The NCDRC had said in its order: &amp;quot;It is significant to note that irrespective of the age of the deceased/victim, their financial status etc., all the complainants have claimed almost the same amount of compensation, ranging between 7,00,00,000 to 9,00,00,000/under identical heads.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 1 February, 2015, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1150201/jsp/nation/story_11023.jsp#.VM42KS7xxpA&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;amri-victims-seek-damages-4675206&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4675206,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 27158,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | AMRI victims seek damages&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Consumer Rights,Hospital,Human Rights,Law and Justice&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Telegraph


New Delhi: Survivors and family members of the 93 people killed in the fire at Calcutta&#039;s AMRI hospital in 2011 have moved the Supreme Court seeking compensation between Rs 7 crore and Rs 9 crore each.


A bench of Justices...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;Survivors and family members of the 93 people killed in the fire at Calcutta&#039;s AMRI hospital in 2011 have moved the Supreme Court seeking compensation between Rs 7 crore and Rs 9 crore each.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;A bench of Justices S.J. Mukhopadhaya and A.M. Sapre yesterday issued notices to AMRI on the application moved by the victims, led by Paromita Guha Thakurta and others, challenging a National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission judgment of November 17, 2014, that had dismissed their plea on grounds of &amp;quot;exaggerated&amp;quot; claims.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The apex court sought the response after counsel Vikramjit Banerjee, appearing for the victims, said the NCDRC had erroneously dismissed their plea without giving the appellants an opportunity to substantiate their case.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;About 15 survivors and family members of the dead had moved the NCDRC for the compensation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In their petition before the apex court, the applicants said most of those who lost their lives in the fire were the sole breadwinners of their families and that some of the victims were elderly citizens.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The petition said the hospital management was solely responsible for the loss of lives because the fire started in the annexe building that was meant to be used as a parking lot but had been converted into a storage space where combustible items such as chemical waste, diesel, oxygen cylinders and cotton were stored.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;It recalled that the apex court in the Charan Singh v. Healing Touch Hospital &amp;amp; Others case in 2000 had ruled that &amp;quot;whether the claim of the appellant was &#039;realistic&#039;, &#039;exaggerated&#039; or &#039;excessive&#039; could only have been determined after the appellant had been given an opportunity to prove the case he had set up and established his claim under various heads. It was not fair to call his claim &#039;unrealistic&#039;.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Hence, the petitioners contended, the NCDRC should not have dismissed their claims.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The NCDRC had said in its order: &amp;quot;It is significant to note that irrespective of the age of the deceased/victim, their financial status etc., all the complainants have claimed almost the same amount of compensation, ranging between 7,00,00,000 to 9,00,00,000/under identical heads.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 27158,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;AMRI victims seek damages&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;Survivors and family members of the 93 people killed in the fire at Calcutta&#039;s AMRI hospital in 2011 have moved the Supreme Court seeking compensation between Rs 7 crore and Rs 9 crore each.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
A bench of Justices S.J. Mukhopadhaya and A.M. Sapre yesterday issued notices to AMRI on the application moved by the victims, led by Paromita Guha Thakurta and others, challenging a National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission judgment of November 17, 2014, that had dismissed their plea on grounds of &amp;quot;exaggerated&amp;quot; claims.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The apex court sought the response after counsel Vikramjit Banerjee, appearing for the victims, said the NCDRC had erroneously dismissed their plea without giving the appellants an opportunity to substantiate their case.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
About 15 survivors and family members of the dead had moved the NCDRC for the compensation.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In their petition before the apex court, the applicants said most of those who lost their lives in the fire were the sole breadwinners of their families and that some of the victims were elderly citizens.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The petition said the hospital management was solely responsible for the loss of lives because the fire started in the annexe building that was meant to be used as a parking lot but had been converted into a storage space where combustible items such as chemical waste, diesel, oxygen cylinders and cotton were stored.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
It recalled that the apex court in the Charan Singh v. Healing Touch Hospital &amp;amp; Others case in 2000 had ruled that &amp;quot;whether the claim of the appellant was &#039;realistic&#039;, &#039;exaggerated&#039; or &#039;excessive&#039; could only have been determined after the appellant had been given an opportunity to prove the case he had set up and established his claim under various heads. It was not fair to call his claim &#039;unrealistic&#039;.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Hence, the petitioners contended, the NCDRC should not have dismissed their claims.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The NCDRC had said in its order: &amp;quot;It is significant to note that irrespective of the age of the deceased/victim, their financial status etc., all the complainants have claimed almost the same amount of compensation, ranging between 7,00,00,000 to 9,00,00,000/under identical heads.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 1 February, 2015, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1150201/jsp/nation/story_11023.jsp#.VM42KS7xxpA&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;amri-victims-seek-damages-4675206&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4675206,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 27158
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | AMRI victims seek damages&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Consumer Rights,Hospital,Human Rights,Law and Justice&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Telegraph


New Delhi: Survivors and family members of the 93 people killed in the fire at Calcutta&#039;s AMRI hospital in 2011 have moved the Supreme Court seeking compensation between Rs 7 crore and Rs 9 crore each.


A bench of Justices...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;Survivors and family members of the 93 people killed in the fire at Calcutta&#039;s AMRI hospital in 2011 have moved the Supreme Court seeking compensation between Rs 7 crore and Rs 9 crore each.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;A bench of Justices S.J. Mukhopadhaya and A.M. Sapre yesterday issued notices to AMRI on the application moved by the victims, led by Paromita Guha Thakurta and others, challenging a National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission judgment of November 17, 2014, that had dismissed their plea on grounds of &amp;quot;exaggerated&amp;quot; claims.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The apex court sought the response after counsel Vikramjit Banerjee, appearing for the victims, said the NCDRC had erroneously dismissed their plea without giving the appellants an opportunity to substantiate their case.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;About 15 survivors and family members of the dead had moved the NCDRC for the compensation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In their petition before the apex court, the applicants said most of those who lost their lives in the fire were the sole breadwinners of their families and that some of the victims were elderly citizens.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The petition said the hospital management was solely responsible for the loss of lives because the fire started in the annexe building that was meant to be used as a parking lot but had been converted into a storage space where combustible items such as chemical waste, diesel, oxygen cylinders and cotton were stored.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;It recalled that the apex court in the Charan Singh v. Healing Touch Hospital &amp;amp; Others case in 2000 had ruled that &amp;quot;whether the claim of the appellant was &#039;realistic&#039;, &#039;exaggerated&#039; or &#039;excessive&#039; could only have been determined after the appellant had been given an opportunity to prove the case he had set up and established his claim under various heads. It was not fair to call his claim &#039;unrealistic&#039;.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Hence, the petitioners contended, the NCDRC should not have dismissed their claims.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The NCDRC had said in its order: &amp;quot;It is significant to note that irrespective of the age of the deceased/victim, their financial status etc., all the complainants have claimed almost the same amount of compensation, ranging between 7,00,00,000 to 9,00,00,000/under identical heads.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/amri-victims-seek-damages-4675206.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | AMRI victims seek damages | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Telegraph


New Delhi: Survivors and family members of the 93 people killed in the fire at Calcutta's AMRI hospital in 2011 have moved the Supreme Court seeking compensation between Rs 7 crore and Rs 9 crore each.


A bench of Justices..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>AMRI victims seek damages</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><em>New Delhi: </em>Survivors and family members of the 93 people killed in the fire at Calcutta's AMRI hospital in 2011 have moved the Supreme Court seeking compensation between Rs 7 crore and Rs 9 crore each.</p><p align="justify">A bench of Justices S.J. Mukhopadhaya and A.M. Sapre yesterday issued notices to AMRI on the application moved by the victims, led by Paromita Guha Thakurta and others, challenging a National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission judgment of November 17, 2014, that had dismissed their plea on grounds of &quot;exaggerated&quot; claims.</p><p align="justify">The apex court sought the response after counsel Vikramjit Banerjee, appearing for the victims, said the NCDRC had erroneously dismissed their plea without giving the appellants an opportunity to substantiate their case.</p><p align="justify">About 15 survivors and family members of the dead had moved the NCDRC for the compensation.</p><p align="justify">In their petition before the apex court, the applicants said most of those who lost their lives in the fire were the sole breadwinners of their families and that some of the victims were elderly citizens.</p><p align="justify">The petition said the hospital management was solely responsible for the loss of lives because the fire started in the annexe building that was meant to be used as a parking lot but had been converted into a storage space where combustible items such as chemical waste, diesel, oxygen cylinders and cotton were stored.</p><p align="justify">It recalled that the apex court in the Charan Singh v. Healing Touch Hospital &amp; Others case in 2000 had ruled that &quot;whether the claim of the appellant was 'realistic', 'exaggerated' or 'excessive' could only have been determined after the appellant had been given an opportunity to prove the case he had set up and established his claim under various heads. It was not fair to call his claim 'unrealistic'.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Hence, the petitioners contended, the NCDRC should not have dismissed their claims.</p><p align="justify">The NCDRC had said in its order: &quot;It is significant to note that irrespective of the age of the deceased/victim, their financial status etc., all the complainants have claimed almost the same amount of compensation, ranging between 7,00,00,000 to 9,00,00,000/under identical heads.&quot;</p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 27158,
		'title' => 'AMRI victims seek damages',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Telegraph
</div>
<p align="justify">
<em>New Delhi: </em>Survivors and family members of the 93 people killed in the fire at Calcutta's AMRI hospital in 2011 have moved the Supreme Court seeking compensation between Rs 7 crore and Rs 9 crore each.
</p>
<p align="justify">
A bench of Justices S.J. Mukhopadhaya and A.M. Sapre yesterday issued notices to AMRI on the application moved by the victims, led by Paromita Guha Thakurta and others, challenging a National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission judgment of November 17, 2014, that had dismissed their plea on grounds of &quot;exaggerated&quot; claims.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The apex court sought the response after counsel Vikramjit Banerjee, appearing for the victims, said the NCDRC had erroneously dismissed their plea without giving the appellants an opportunity to substantiate their case.
</p>
<p align="justify">
About 15 survivors and family members of the dead had moved the NCDRC for the compensation.
</p>
<p align="justify">
In their petition before the apex court, the applicants said most of those who lost their lives in the fire were the sole breadwinners of their families and that some of the victims were elderly citizens.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The petition said the hospital management was solely responsible for the loss of lives because the fire started in the annexe building that was meant to be used as a parking lot but had been converted into a storage space where combustible items such as chemical waste, diesel, oxygen cylinders and cotton were stored.
</p>
<p align="justify">
It recalled that the apex court in the Charan Singh v. Healing Touch Hospital &amp; Others case in 2000 had ruled that &quot;whether the claim of the appellant was 'realistic', 'exaggerated' or 'excessive' could only have been determined after the appellant had been given an opportunity to prove the case he had set up and established his claim under various heads. It was not fair to call his claim 'unrealistic'.&quot;
</p>
<p align="justify">
Hence, the petitioners contended, the NCDRC should not have dismissed their claims.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The NCDRC had said in its order: &quot;It is significant to note that irrespective of the age of the deceased/victim, their financial status etc., all the complainants have claimed almost the same amount of compensation, ranging between 7,00,00,000 to 9,00,00,000/under identical heads.&quot;
</p>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 1 February, 2015, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1150201/jsp/nation/story_11023.jsp#.VM42KS7xxpA',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'amri-victims-seek-damages-4675206',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 4675206,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 27158,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | AMRI victims seek damages',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Consumer Rights,Hospital,Human Rights,Law and Justice',
	'metaDesc' => '
-The Telegraph


New Delhi: Survivors and family members of the 93 people killed in the fire at Calcutta's AMRI hospital in 2011 have moved the Supreme Court seeking compensation between Rs 7 crore and Rs 9 crore each.


A bench of Justices...',
	'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><em>New Delhi: </em>Survivors and family members of the 93 people killed in the fire at Calcutta's AMRI hospital in 2011 have moved the Supreme Court seeking compensation between Rs 7 crore and Rs 9 crore each.</p><p align="justify">A bench of Justices S.J. Mukhopadhaya and A.M. Sapre yesterday issued notices to AMRI on the application moved by the victims, led by Paromita Guha Thakurta and others, challenging a National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission judgment of November 17, 2014, that had dismissed their plea on grounds of &quot;exaggerated&quot; claims.</p><p align="justify">The apex court sought the response after counsel Vikramjit Banerjee, appearing for the victims, said the NCDRC had erroneously dismissed their plea without giving the appellants an opportunity to substantiate their case.</p><p align="justify">About 15 survivors and family members of the dead had moved the NCDRC for the compensation.</p><p align="justify">In their petition before the apex court, the applicants said most of those who lost their lives in the fire were the sole breadwinners of their families and that some of the victims were elderly citizens.</p><p align="justify">The petition said the hospital management was solely responsible for the loss of lives because the fire started in the annexe building that was meant to be used as a parking lot but had been converted into a storage space where combustible items such as chemical waste, diesel, oxygen cylinders and cotton were stored.</p><p align="justify">It recalled that the apex court in the Charan Singh v. Healing Touch Hospital &amp; Others case in 2000 had ruled that &quot;whether the claim of the appellant was 'realistic', 'exaggerated' or 'excessive' could only have been determined after the appellant had been given an opportunity to prove the case he had set up and established his claim under various heads. It was not fair to call his claim 'unrealistic'.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Hence, the petitioners contended, the NCDRC should not have dismissed their claims.</p><p align="justify">The NCDRC had said in its order: &quot;It is significant to note that irrespective of the age of the deceased/victim, their financial status etc., all the complainants have claimed almost the same amount of compensation, ranging between 7,00,00,000 to 9,00,00,000/under identical heads.&quot;</p>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 27158,
	'title' => 'AMRI victims seek damages',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Telegraph
</div>
<p align="justify">
<em>New Delhi: </em>Survivors and family members of the 93 people killed in the fire at Calcutta's AMRI hospital in 2011 have moved the Supreme Court seeking compensation between Rs 7 crore and Rs 9 crore each.
</p>
<p align="justify">
A bench of Justices S.J. Mukhopadhaya and A.M. Sapre yesterday issued notices to AMRI on the application moved by the victims, led by Paromita Guha Thakurta and others, challenging a National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission judgment of November 17, 2014, that had dismissed their plea on grounds of &quot;exaggerated&quot; claims.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The apex court sought the response after counsel Vikramjit Banerjee, appearing for the victims, said the NCDRC had erroneously dismissed their plea without giving the appellants an opportunity to substantiate their case.
</p>
<p align="justify">
About 15 survivors and family members of the dead had moved the NCDRC for the compensation.
</p>
<p align="justify">
In their petition before the apex court, the applicants said most of those who lost their lives in the fire were the sole breadwinners of their families and that some of the victims were elderly citizens.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The petition said the hospital management was solely responsible for the loss of lives because the fire started in the annexe building that was meant to be used as a parking lot but had been converted into a storage space where combustible items such as chemical waste, diesel, oxygen cylinders and cotton were stored.
</p>
<p align="justify">
It recalled that the apex court in the Charan Singh v. Healing Touch Hospital &amp; Others case in 2000 had ruled that &quot;whether the claim of the appellant was 'realistic', 'exaggerated' or 'excessive' could only have been determined after the appellant had been given an opportunity to prove the case he had set up and established his claim under various heads. It was not fair to call his claim 'unrealistic'.&quot;
</p>
<p align="justify">
Hence, the petitioners contended, the NCDRC should not have dismissed their claims.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The NCDRC had said in its order: &quot;It is significant to note that irrespective of the age of the deceased/victim, their financial status etc., all the complainants have claimed almost the same amount of compensation, ranging between 7,00,00,000 to 9,00,00,000/under identical heads.&quot;
</p>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 1 February, 2015, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1150201/jsp/nation/story_11023.jsp#.VM42KS7xxpA',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'amri-victims-seek-damages-4675206',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 4675206,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 27158
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | AMRI victims seek damages'
$metaKeywords = 'Consumer Rights,Hospital,Human Rights,Law and Justice'
$metaDesc = '
-The Telegraph


New Delhi: Survivors and family members of the 93 people killed in the fire at Calcutta's AMRI hospital in 2011 have moved the Supreme Court seeking compensation between Rs 7 crore and Rs 9 crore each.


A bench of Justices...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph</div><p align="justify"><em>New Delhi: </em>Survivors and family members of the 93 people killed in the fire at Calcutta's AMRI hospital in 2011 have moved the Supreme Court seeking compensation between Rs 7 crore and Rs 9 crore each.</p><p align="justify">A bench of Justices S.J. Mukhopadhaya and A.M. Sapre yesterday issued notices to AMRI on the application moved by the victims, led by Paromita Guha Thakurta and others, challenging a National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission judgment of November 17, 2014, that had dismissed their plea on grounds of &quot;exaggerated&quot; claims.</p><p align="justify">The apex court sought the response after counsel Vikramjit Banerjee, appearing for the victims, said the NCDRC had erroneously dismissed their plea without giving the appellants an opportunity to substantiate their case.</p><p align="justify">About 15 survivors and family members of the dead had moved the NCDRC for the compensation.</p><p align="justify">In their petition before the apex court, the applicants said most of those who lost their lives in the fire were the sole breadwinners of their families and that some of the victims were elderly citizens.</p><p align="justify">The petition said the hospital management was solely responsible for the loss of lives because the fire started in the annexe building that was meant to be used as a parking lot but had been converted into a storage space where combustible items such as chemical waste, diesel, oxygen cylinders and cotton were stored.</p><p align="justify">It recalled that the apex court in the Charan Singh v. Healing Touch Hospital &amp; Others case in 2000 had ruled that &quot;whether the claim of the appellant was 'realistic', 'exaggerated' or 'excessive' could only have been determined after the appellant had been given an opportunity to prove the case he had set up and established his claim under various heads. It was not fair to call his claim 'unrealistic'.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Hence, the petitioners contended, the NCDRC should not have dismissed their claims.</p><p align="justify">The NCDRC had said in its order: &quot;It is significant to note that irrespective of the age of the deceased/victim, their financial status etc., all the complainants have claimed almost the same amount of compensation, ranging between 7,00,00,000 to 9,00,00,000/under identical heads.&quot;</p>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

AMRI victims seek damages

-The Telegraph New Delhi: Survivors and family members of the 93 people killed in the fire at Calcutta's AMRI hospital in 2011 have moved the Supreme Court seeking compensation between Rs 7 crore and Rs 9 crore each. A bench of Justices S.J. Mukhopadhaya and A.M. Sapre yesterday issued notices to AMRI on the application moved by the victims, led by Paromita Guha Thakurta and others, challenging a National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission judgment of November 17, 2014, that had dismissed their plea on grounds of "exaggerated" claims. The apex court sought the response after counsel Vikramjit Banerjee, appearing for the victims, said the NCDRC had erroneously dismissed their plea without giving the appellants an opportunity to substantiate their case. About 15 survivors and family members of the dead had moved the NCDRC for the compensation. In their petition before the apex court, the applicants said most of those who lost their lives in the fire were the sole breadwinners of their families and that some of the victims were elderly citizens. The petition said the hospital management was solely responsible for the loss of lives because the fire started in the annexe building that was meant to be used as a parking lot but had been converted into a storage space where combustible items such as chemical waste, diesel, oxygen cylinders and cotton were stored. It recalled that the apex court in the Charan Singh v. Healing Touch Hospital & Others case in 2000 had ruled that "whether the claim of the appellant was 'realistic', 'exaggerated' or 'excessive' could only have been determined after the appellant had been given an opportunity to prove the case he had set up and established his claim under various heads. It was not fair to call his claim 'unrealistic'." Hence, the petitioners contended, the NCDRC should not have dismissed their claims. The NCDRC had said in its order: "It is significant to note that irrespective of the age of the deceased/victim, their financial status etc., all the complainants have claimed almost the same amount of compensation, ranging between 7,00,00,000 to 9,00,00,000/under identical heads."