Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/anil-ambanis-r-infra-challenges-sic-order-bringing-company-under-rti-ambit-9641/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/anil-ambanis-r-infra-challenges-sic-order-bringing-company-under-rti-ambit-9641/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/anil-ambanis-r-infra-challenges-sic-order-bringing-company-under-rti-ambit-9641/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/anil-ambanis-r-infra-challenges-sic-order-bringing-company-under-rti-ambit-9641/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680663a476490-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680663a476490-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680663a476490-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680663a476490-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680663a476490-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680663a476490-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680663a476490-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680663a476490-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680663a476490-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 9532,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Anil Ambani&#039;s R-Infra challenges SIC order bringing company under RTI ambit&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p&gt;
-PTI
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Anil Ambani-led Reliance Infrastructure Ltd has challenged an order passed by the State Information Commission bringing the company under the ambit of the Right to Information Act in the Bombay High Court, arguing that it is a private company and not a public authority. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The SIC on July 19 passed an order bringing R-Infra under the ambit of the RTI after observing that though it was a private company, it provided an &amp;quot;essential public service&amp;quot; of electricity and hence, should come under the Act. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The order came following a complaint filed by one Anil Galgali. The commission had also directed the company to appoint a public information officer and an appellate officer as per the provisions of the RTI. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In its appeal challenging the order, R-Infra said it is not a body or institution of government established or constituted by the Constitution of India. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;R-Infra does not fall within the definition of a public authority as either being owned, controlled or substantially financed by the funds provided by the government,&amp;quot; the petition states. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It further said that even the Information Commission has admitted that R-Infra is a private company and has not been set up by the government. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Thus, there is no question of the RTI Act being made applicable to R-Infra. The order passed by the commission is liable to be quashed and set aside,&amp;quot; the company said. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The petition will come up for hearing in due course of time. Galgali had approached the commission after Reliance Energy declined to provide him information regarding his electricity bills. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Galgali had sought the information under the RTI Act, which was rejected, saying the provisions of the Act does not apply to private companies. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Galgali had argued before the commission that R-Infra was formed under the Company Act and functioned as a public utility and hence, should come under the ambit of RTI. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Accepting his arguments, the commission had observed that the company was given work under the Electricity Act, 2003, and supplying power is a public service under the Act.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Economic Times, 19 August, 2011, http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2011-08-19/news/29905144_1_rti-ambit-rti-act-public-information-officer&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;anil-ambanis-r-infra-challenges-sic-order-bringing-company-under-rti-ambit-9641&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 9641,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 9532,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Anil Ambani&#039;s R-Infra challenges SIC order bringing company under RTI ambit&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Right to Information&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-PTI


&amp;nbsp;


Anil Ambani-led Reliance Infrastructure Ltd has challenged an order passed by the State Information Commission bringing the company under the ambit of the Right to Information Act in the Bombay High Court, arguing that it is a private company and...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p&gt;-PTI&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Anil Ambani-led Reliance Infrastructure Ltd has challenged an order passed by the State Information Commission bringing the company under the ambit of the Right to Information Act in the Bombay High Court, arguing that it is a private company and not a public authority. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The SIC on July 19 passed an order bringing R-Infra under the ambit of the RTI after observing that though it was a private company, it provided an &amp;quot;essential public service&amp;quot; of electricity and hence, should come under the Act. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The order came following a complaint filed by one Anil Galgali. The commission had also directed the company to appoint a public information officer and an appellate officer as per the provisions of the RTI. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In its appeal challenging the order, R-Infra said it is not a body or institution of government established or constituted by the Constitution of India. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;R-Infra does not fall within the definition of a public authority as either being owned, controlled or substantially financed by the funds provided by the government,&amp;quot; the petition states. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It further said that even the Information Commission has admitted that R-Infra is a private company and has not been set up by the government. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Thus, there is no question of the RTI Act being made applicable to R-Infra. The order passed by the commission is liable to be quashed and set aside,&amp;quot; the company said. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The petition will come up for hearing in due course of time. Galgali had approached the commission after Reliance Energy declined to provide him information regarding his electricity bills. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Galgali had sought the information under the RTI Act, which was rejected, saying the provisions of the Act does not apply to private companies. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Galgali had argued before the commission that R-Infra was formed under the Company Act and functioned as a public utility and hence, should come under the ambit of RTI. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Accepting his arguments, the commission had observed that the company was given work under the Electricity Act, 2003, and supplying power is a public service under the Act.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 9532,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Anil Ambani&#039;s R-Infra challenges SIC order bringing company under RTI ambit&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p&gt;
-PTI
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Anil Ambani-led Reliance Infrastructure Ltd has challenged an order passed by the State Information Commission bringing the company under the ambit of the Right to Information Act in the Bombay High Court, arguing that it is a private company and not a public authority. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The SIC on July 19 passed an order bringing R-Infra under the ambit of the RTI after observing that though it was a private company, it provided an &amp;quot;essential public service&amp;quot; of electricity and hence, should come under the Act. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The order came following a complaint filed by one Anil Galgali. The commission had also directed the company to appoint a public information officer and an appellate officer as per the provisions of the RTI. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In its appeal challenging the order, R-Infra said it is not a body or institution of government established or constituted by the Constitution of India. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;R-Infra does not fall within the definition of a public authority as either being owned, controlled or substantially financed by the funds provided by the government,&amp;quot; the petition states. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It further said that even the Information Commission has admitted that R-Infra is a private company and has not been set up by the government. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Thus, there is no question of the RTI Act being made applicable to R-Infra. The order passed by the commission is liable to be quashed and set aside,&amp;quot; the company said. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The petition will come up for hearing in due course of time. Galgali had approached the commission after Reliance Energy declined to provide him information regarding his electricity bills. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Galgali had sought the information under the RTI Act, which was rejected, saying the provisions of the Act does not apply to private companies. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Galgali had argued before the commission that R-Infra was formed under the Company Act and functioned as a public utility and hence, should come under the ambit of RTI. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Accepting his arguments, the commission had observed that the company was given work under the Electricity Act, 2003, and supplying power is a public service under the Act.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Economic Times, 19 August, 2011, http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2011-08-19/news/29905144_1_rti-ambit-rti-act-public-information-officer&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;anil-ambanis-r-infra-challenges-sic-order-bringing-company-under-rti-ambit-9641&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 9641,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 9532
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Anil Ambani&#039;s R-Infra challenges SIC order bringing company under RTI ambit&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Right to Information&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-PTI


&amp;nbsp;


Anil Ambani-led Reliance Infrastructure Ltd has challenged an order passed by the State Information Commission bringing the company under the ambit of the Right to Information Act in the Bombay High Court, arguing that it is a private company and...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;p&gt;-PTI&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Anil Ambani-led Reliance Infrastructure Ltd has challenged an order passed by the State Information Commission bringing the company under the ambit of the Right to Information Act in the Bombay High Court, arguing that it is a private company and not a public authority. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The SIC on July 19 passed an order bringing R-Infra under the ambit of the RTI after observing that though it was a private company, it provided an &amp;quot;essential public service&amp;quot; of electricity and hence, should come under the Act. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The order came following a complaint filed by one Anil Galgali. The commission had also directed the company to appoint a public information officer and an appellate officer as per the provisions of the RTI. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In its appeal challenging the order, R-Infra said it is not a body or institution of government established or constituted by the Constitution of India. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;R-Infra does not fall within the definition of a public authority as either being owned, controlled or substantially financed by the funds provided by the government,&amp;quot; the petition states. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It further said that even the Information Commission has admitted that R-Infra is a private company and has not been set up by the government. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Thus, there is no question of the RTI Act being made applicable to R-Infra. The order passed by the commission is liable to be quashed and set aside,&amp;quot; the company said. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The petition will come up for hearing in due course of time. Galgali had approached the commission after Reliance Energy declined to provide him information regarding his electricity bills. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Galgali had sought the information under the RTI Act, which was rejected, saying the provisions of the Act does not apply to private companies. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Galgali had argued before the commission that R-Infra was formed under the Company Act and functioned as a public utility and hence, should come under the ambit of RTI. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Accepting his arguments, the commission had observed that the company was given work under the Electricity Act, 2003, and supplying power is a public service under the Act.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/anil-ambanis-r-infra-challenges-sic-order-bringing-company-under-rti-ambit-9641.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Anil Ambani's R-Infra challenges SIC order bringing company under RTI ambit | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-PTI


&nbsp;


Anil Ambani-led Reliance Infrastructure Ltd has challenged an order passed by the State Information Commission bringing the company under the ambit of the Right to Information Act in the Bombay High Court, arguing that it is a private company and..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Anil Ambani's R-Infra challenges SIC order bringing company under RTI ambit</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <p>-PTI</p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">Anil Ambani-led Reliance Infrastructure Ltd has challenged an order passed by the State Information Commission bringing the company under the ambit of the Right to Information Act in the Bombay High Court, arguing that it is a private company and not a public authority. <br /><br />The SIC on July 19 passed an order bringing R-Infra under the ambit of the RTI after observing that though it was a private company, it provided an &quot;essential public service&quot; of electricity and hence, should come under the Act. <br /><br />The order came following a complaint filed by one Anil Galgali. The commission had also directed the company to appoint a public information officer and an appellate officer as per the provisions of the RTI. <br /><br />In its appeal challenging the order, R-Infra said it is not a body or institution of government established or constituted by the Constitution of India. <br /><br />&quot;R-Infra does not fall within the definition of a public authority as either being owned, controlled or substantially financed by the funds provided by the government,&quot; the petition states. <br /><br />It further said that even the Information Commission has admitted that R-Infra is a private company and has not been set up by the government. <br /><br />&quot;Thus, there is no question of the RTI Act being made applicable to R-Infra. The order passed by the commission is liable to be quashed and set aside,&quot; the company said. <br /><br />The petition will come up for hearing in due course of time. Galgali had approached the commission after Reliance Energy declined to provide him information regarding his electricity bills. <br /><br />Galgali had sought the information under the RTI Act, which was rejected, saying the provisions of the Act does not apply to private companies. <br /><br />Galgali had argued before the commission that R-Infra was formed under the Company Act and functioned as a public utility and hence, should come under the ambit of RTI. <br /><br />Accepting his arguments, the commission had observed that the company was given work under the Electricity Act, 2003, and supplying power is a public service under the Act.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680663a476490-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680663a476490-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680663a476490-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680663a476490-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680663a476490-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680663a476490-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680663a476490-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680663a476490-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680663a476490-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 9532,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Anil Ambani&#039;s R-Infra challenges SIC order bringing company under RTI ambit&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p&gt;
-PTI
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Anil Ambani-led Reliance Infrastructure Ltd has challenged an order passed by the State Information Commission bringing the company under the ambit of the Right to Information Act in the Bombay High Court, arguing that it is a private company and not a public authority. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The SIC on July 19 passed an order bringing R-Infra under the ambit of the RTI after observing that though it was a private company, it provided an &amp;quot;essential public service&amp;quot; of electricity and hence, should come under the Act. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The order came following a complaint filed by one Anil Galgali. The commission had also directed the company to appoint a public information officer and an appellate officer as per the provisions of the RTI. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In its appeal challenging the order, R-Infra said it is not a body or institution of government established or constituted by the Constitution of India. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;R-Infra does not fall within the definition of a public authority as either being owned, controlled or substantially financed by the funds provided by the government,&amp;quot; the petition states. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It further said that even the Information Commission has admitted that R-Infra is a private company and has not been set up by the government. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Thus, there is no question of the RTI Act being made applicable to R-Infra. The order passed by the commission is liable to be quashed and set aside,&amp;quot; the company said. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The petition will come up for hearing in due course of time. Galgali had approached the commission after Reliance Energy declined to provide him information regarding his electricity bills. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Galgali had sought the information under the RTI Act, which was rejected, saying the provisions of the Act does not apply to private companies. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Galgali had argued before the commission that R-Infra was formed under the Company Act and functioned as a public utility and hence, should come under the ambit of RTI. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Accepting his arguments, the commission had observed that the company was given work under the Electricity Act, 2003, and supplying power is a public service under the Act.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Economic Times, 19 August, 2011, http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2011-08-19/news/29905144_1_rti-ambit-rti-act-public-information-officer&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;anil-ambanis-r-infra-challenges-sic-order-bringing-company-under-rti-ambit-9641&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 9641,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 9532,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Anil Ambani&#039;s R-Infra challenges SIC order bringing company under RTI ambit&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Right to Information&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-PTI


&amp;nbsp;


Anil Ambani-led Reliance Infrastructure Ltd has challenged an order passed by the State Information Commission bringing the company under the ambit of the Right to Information Act in the Bombay High Court, arguing that it is a private company and...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p&gt;-PTI&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Anil Ambani-led Reliance Infrastructure Ltd has challenged an order passed by the State Information Commission bringing the company under the ambit of the Right to Information Act in the Bombay High Court, arguing that it is a private company and not a public authority. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The SIC on July 19 passed an order bringing R-Infra under the ambit of the RTI after observing that though it was a private company, it provided an &amp;quot;essential public service&amp;quot; of electricity and hence, should come under the Act. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The order came following a complaint filed by one Anil Galgali. The commission had also directed the company to appoint a public information officer and an appellate officer as per the provisions of the RTI. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In its appeal challenging the order, R-Infra said it is not a body or institution of government established or constituted by the Constitution of India. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;R-Infra does not fall within the definition of a public authority as either being owned, controlled or substantially financed by the funds provided by the government,&amp;quot; the petition states. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It further said that even the Information Commission has admitted that R-Infra is a private company and has not been set up by the government. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Thus, there is no question of the RTI Act being made applicable to R-Infra. The order passed by the commission is liable to be quashed and set aside,&amp;quot; the company said. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The petition will come up for hearing in due course of time. Galgali had approached the commission after Reliance Energy declined to provide him information regarding his electricity bills. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Galgali had sought the information under the RTI Act, which was rejected, saying the provisions of the Act does not apply to private companies. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Galgali had argued before the commission that R-Infra was formed under the Company Act and functioned as a public utility and hence, should come under the ambit of RTI. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Accepting his arguments, the commission had observed that the company was given work under the Electricity Act, 2003, and supplying power is a public service under the Act.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 9532,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Anil Ambani&#039;s R-Infra challenges SIC order bringing company under RTI ambit&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p&gt;
-PTI
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Anil Ambani-led Reliance Infrastructure Ltd has challenged an order passed by the State Information Commission bringing the company under the ambit of the Right to Information Act in the Bombay High Court, arguing that it is a private company and not a public authority. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The SIC on July 19 passed an order bringing R-Infra under the ambit of the RTI after observing that though it was a private company, it provided an &amp;quot;essential public service&amp;quot; of electricity and hence, should come under the Act. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The order came following a complaint filed by one Anil Galgali. The commission had also directed the company to appoint a public information officer and an appellate officer as per the provisions of the RTI. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In its appeal challenging the order, R-Infra said it is not a body or institution of government established or constituted by the Constitution of India. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;R-Infra does not fall within the definition of a public authority as either being owned, controlled or substantially financed by the funds provided by the government,&amp;quot; the petition states. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It further said that even the Information Commission has admitted that R-Infra is a private company and has not been set up by the government. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Thus, there is no question of the RTI Act being made applicable to R-Infra. The order passed by the commission is liable to be quashed and set aside,&amp;quot; the company said. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The petition will come up for hearing in due course of time. Galgali had approached the commission after Reliance Energy declined to provide him information regarding his electricity bills. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Galgali had sought the information under the RTI Act, which was rejected, saying the provisions of the Act does not apply to private companies. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Galgali had argued before the commission that R-Infra was formed under the Company Act and functioned as a public utility and hence, should come under the ambit of RTI. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Accepting his arguments, the commission had observed that the company was given work under the Electricity Act, 2003, and supplying power is a public service under the Act.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Economic Times, 19 August, 2011, http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2011-08-19/news/29905144_1_rti-ambit-rti-act-public-information-officer&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;anil-ambanis-r-infra-challenges-sic-order-bringing-company-under-rti-ambit-9641&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 9641,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 9532
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Anil Ambani&#039;s R-Infra challenges SIC order bringing company under RTI ambit&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Right to Information&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-PTI


&amp;nbsp;


Anil Ambani-led Reliance Infrastructure Ltd has challenged an order passed by the State Information Commission bringing the company under the ambit of the Right to Information Act in the Bombay High Court, arguing that it is a private company and...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;p&gt;-PTI&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Anil Ambani-led Reliance Infrastructure Ltd has challenged an order passed by the State Information Commission bringing the company under the ambit of the Right to Information Act in the Bombay High Court, arguing that it is a private company and not a public authority. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The SIC on July 19 passed an order bringing R-Infra under the ambit of the RTI after observing that though it was a private company, it provided an &amp;quot;essential public service&amp;quot; of electricity and hence, should come under the Act. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The order came following a complaint filed by one Anil Galgali. The commission had also directed the company to appoint a public information officer and an appellate officer as per the provisions of the RTI. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In its appeal challenging the order, R-Infra said it is not a body or institution of government established or constituted by the Constitution of India. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;R-Infra does not fall within the definition of a public authority as either being owned, controlled or substantially financed by the funds provided by the government,&amp;quot; the petition states. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It further said that even the Information Commission has admitted that R-Infra is a private company and has not been set up by the government. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Thus, there is no question of the RTI Act being made applicable to R-Infra. The order passed by the commission is liable to be quashed and set aside,&amp;quot; the company said. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The petition will come up for hearing in due course of time. Galgali had approached the commission after Reliance Energy declined to provide him information regarding his electricity bills. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Galgali had sought the information under the RTI Act, which was rejected, saying the provisions of the Act does not apply to private companies. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Galgali had argued before the commission that R-Infra was formed under the Company Act and functioned as a public utility and hence, should come under the ambit of RTI. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Accepting his arguments, the commission had observed that the company was given work under the Electricity Act, 2003, and supplying power is a public service under the Act.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/anil-ambanis-r-infra-challenges-sic-order-bringing-company-under-rti-ambit-9641.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Anil Ambani's R-Infra challenges SIC order bringing company under RTI ambit | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-PTI


&nbsp;


Anil Ambani-led Reliance Infrastructure Ltd has challenged an order passed by the State Information Commission bringing the company under the ambit of the Right to Information Act in the Bombay High Court, arguing that it is a private company and..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Anil Ambani's R-Infra challenges SIC order bringing company under RTI ambit</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <p>-PTI</p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">Anil Ambani-led Reliance Infrastructure Ltd has challenged an order passed by the State Information Commission bringing the company under the ambit of the Right to Information Act in the Bombay High Court, arguing that it is a private company and not a public authority. <br /><br />The SIC on July 19 passed an order bringing R-Infra under the ambit of the RTI after observing that though it was a private company, it provided an &quot;essential public service&quot; of electricity and hence, should come under the Act. <br /><br />The order came following a complaint filed by one Anil Galgali. The commission had also directed the company to appoint a public information officer and an appellate officer as per the provisions of the RTI. <br /><br />In its appeal challenging the order, R-Infra said it is not a body or institution of government established or constituted by the Constitution of India. <br /><br />&quot;R-Infra does not fall within the definition of a public authority as either being owned, controlled or substantially financed by the funds provided by the government,&quot; the petition states. <br /><br />It further said that even the Information Commission has admitted that R-Infra is a private company and has not been set up by the government. <br /><br />&quot;Thus, there is no question of the RTI Act being made applicable to R-Infra. The order passed by the commission is liable to be quashed and set aside,&quot; the company said. <br /><br />The petition will come up for hearing in due course of time. Galgali had approached the commission after Reliance Energy declined to provide him information regarding his electricity bills. <br /><br />Galgali had sought the information under the RTI Act, which was rejected, saying the provisions of the Act does not apply to private companies. <br /><br />Galgali had argued before the commission that R-Infra was formed under the Company Act and functioned as a public utility and hence, should come under the ambit of RTI. <br /><br />Accepting his arguments, the commission had observed that the company was given work under the Electricity Act, 2003, and supplying power is a public service under the Act.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680663a476490-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680663a476490-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680663a476490-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680663a476490-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680663a476490-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680663a476490-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680663a476490-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680663a476490-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680663a476490-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 9532,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Anil Ambani&#039;s R-Infra challenges SIC order bringing company under RTI ambit&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p&gt;
-PTI
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Anil Ambani-led Reliance Infrastructure Ltd has challenged an order passed by the State Information Commission bringing the company under the ambit of the Right to Information Act in the Bombay High Court, arguing that it is a private company and not a public authority. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The SIC on July 19 passed an order bringing R-Infra under the ambit of the RTI after observing that though it was a private company, it provided an &amp;quot;essential public service&amp;quot; of electricity and hence, should come under the Act. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The order came following a complaint filed by one Anil Galgali. The commission had also directed the company to appoint a public information officer and an appellate officer as per the provisions of the RTI. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In its appeal challenging the order, R-Infra said it is not a body or institution of government established or constituted by the Constitution of India. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;R-Infra does not fall within the definition of a public authority as either being owned, controlled or substantially financed by the funds provided by the government,&amp;quot; the petition states. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It further said that even the Information Commission has admitted that R-Infra is a private company and has not been set up by the government. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Thus, there is no question of the RTI Act being made applicable to R-Infra. The order passed by the commission is liable to be quashed and set aside,&amp;quot; the company said. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The petition will come up for hearing in due course of time. Galgali had approached the commission after Reliance Energy declined to provide him information regarding his electricity bills. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Galgali had sought the information under the RTI Act, which was rejected, saying the provisions of the Act does not apply to private companies. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Galgali had argued before the commission that R-Infra was formed under the Company Act and functioned as a public utility and hence, should come under the ambit of RTI. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Accepting his arguments, the commission had observed that the company was given work under the Electricity Act, 2003, and supplying power is a public service under the Act.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Economic Times, 19 August, 2011, http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2011-08-19/news/29905144_1_rti-ambit-rti-act-public-information-officer&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;anil-ambanis-r-infra-challenges-sic-order-bringing-company-under-rti-ambit-9641&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 9641,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 9532,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Anil Ambani&#039;s R-Infra challenges SIC order bringing company under RTI ambit&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Right to Information&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-PTI


&amp;nbsp;


Anil Ambani-led Reliance Infrastructure Ltd has challenged an order passed by the State Information Commission bringing the company under the ambit of the Right to Information Act in the Bombay High Court, arguing that it is a private company and...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p&gt;-PTI&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Anil Ambani-led Reliance Infrastructure Ltd has challenged an order passed by the State Information Commission bringing the company under the ambit of the Right to Information Act in the Bombay High Court, arguing that it is a private company and not a public authority. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The SIC on July 19 passed an order bringing R-Infra under the ambit of the RTI after observing that though it was a private company, it provided an &amp;quot;essential public service&amp;quot; of electricity and hence, should come under the Act. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The order came following a complaint filed by one Anil Galgali. The commission had also directed the company to appoint a public information officer and an appellate officer as per the provisions of the RTI. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In its appeal challenging the order, R-Infra said it is not a body or institution of government established or constituted by the Constitution of India. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;R-Infra does not fall within the definition of a public authority as either being owned, controlled or substantially financed by the funds provided by the government,&amp;quot; the petition states. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It further said that even the Information Commission has admitted that R-Infra is a private company and has not been set up by the government. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Thus, there is no question of the RTI Act being made applicable to R-Infra. The order passed by the commission is liable to be quashed and set aside,&amp;quot; the company said. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The petition will come up for hearing in due course of time. Galgali had approached the commission after Reliance Energy declined to provide him information regarding his electricity bills. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Galgali had sought the information under the RTI Act, which was rejected, saying the provisions of the Act does not apply to private companies. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Galgali had argued before the commission that R-Infra was formed under the Company Act and functioned as a public utility and hence, should come under the ambit of RTI. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Accepting his arguments, the commission had observed that the company was given work under the Electricity Act, 2003, and supplying power is a public service under the Act.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 9532,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Anil Ambani&#039;s R-Infra challenges SIC order bringing company under RTI ambit&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;p&gt;
-PTI
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Anil Ambani-led Reliance Infrastructure Ltd has challenged an order passed by the State Information Commission bringing the company under the ambit of the Right to Information Act in the Bombay High Court, arguing that it is a private company and not a public authority. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The SIC on July 19 passed an order bringing R-Infra under the ambit of the RTI after observing that though it was a private company, it provided an &amp;quot;essential public service&amp;quot; of electricity and hence, should come under the Act. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The order came following a complaint filed by one Anil Galgali. The commission had also directed the company to appoint a public information officer and an appellate officer as per the provisions of the RTI. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In its appeal challenging the order, R-Infra said it is not a body or institution of government established or constituted by the Constitution of India. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;R-Infra does not fall within the definition of a public authority as either being owned, controlled or substantially financed by the funds provided by the government,&amp;quot; the petition states. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It further said that even the Information Commission has admitted that R-Infra is a private company and has not been set up by the government. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Thus, there is no question of the RTI Act being made applicable to R-Infra. The order passed by the commission is liable to be quashed and set aside,&amp;quot; the company said. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The petition will come up for hearing in due course of time. Galgali had approached the commission after Reliance Energy declined to provide him information regarding his electricity bills. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Galgali had sought the information under the RTI Act, which was rejected, saying the provisions of the Act does not apply to private companies. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Galgali had argued before the commission that R-Infra was formed under the Company Act and functioned as a public utility and hence, should come under the ambit of RTI. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Accepting his arguments, the commission had observed that the company was given work under the Electricity Act, 2003, and supplying power is a public service under the Act.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Economic Times, 19 August, 2011, http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2011-08-19/news/29905144_1_rti-ambit-rti-act-public-information-officer&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;anil-ambanis-r-infra-challenges-sic-order-bringing-company-under-rti-ambit-9641&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 9641,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 9532
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Anil Ambani&#039;s R-Infra challenges SIC order bringing company under RTI ambit&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Right to Information&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-PTI


&amp;nbsp;


Anil Ambani-led Reliance Infrastructure Ltd has challenged an order passed by the State Information Commission bringing the company under the ambit of the Right to Information Act in the Bombay High Court, arguing that it is a private company and...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;p&gt;-PTI&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Anil Ambani-led Reliance Infrastructure Ltd has challenged an order passed by the State Information Commission bringing the company under the ambit of the Right to Information Act in the Bombay High Court, arguing that it is a private company and not a public authority. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The SIC on July 19 passed an order bringing R-Infra under the ambit of the RTI after observing that though it was a private company, it provided an &amp;quot;essential public service&amp;quot; of electricity and hence, should come under the Act. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The order came following a complaint filed by one Anil Galgali. The commission had also directed the company to appoint a public information officer and an appellate officer as per the provisions of the RTI. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In its appeal challenging the order, R-Infra said it is not a body or institution of government established or constituted by the Constitution of India. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;R-Infra does not fall within the definition of a public authority as either being owned, controlled or substantially financed by the funds provided by the government,&amp;quot; the petition states. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It further said that even the Information Commission has admitted that R-Infra is a private company and has not been set up by the government. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Thus, there is no question of the RTI Act being made applicable to R-Infra. The order passed by the commission is liable to be quashed and set aside,&amp;quot; the company said. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The petition will come up for hearing in due course of time. Galgali had approached the commission after Reliance Energy declined to provide him information regarding his electricity bills. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Galgali had sought the information under the RTI Act, which was rejected, saying the provisions of the Act does not apply to private companies. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Galgali had argued before the commission that R-Infra was formed under the Company Act and functioned as a public utility and hence, should come under the ambit of RTI. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Accepting his arguments, the commission had observed that the company was given work under the Electricity Act, 2003, and supplying power is a public service under the Act.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/anil-ambanis-r-infra-challenges-sic-order-bringing-company-under-rti-ambit-9641.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Anil Ambani's R-Infra challenges SIC order bringing company under RTI ambit | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-PTI


&nbsp;


Anil Ambani-led Reliance Infrastructure Ltd has challenged an order passed by the State Information Commission bringing the company under the ambit of the Right to Information Act in the Bombay High Court, arguing that it is a private company and..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Anil Ambani's R-Infra challenges SIC order bringing company under RTI ambit</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <p>-PTI</p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">Anil Ambani-led Reliance Infrastructure Ltd has challenged an order passed by the State Information Commission bringing the company under the ambit of the Right to Information Act in the Bombay High Court, arguing that it is a private company and not a public authority. <br /><br />The SIC on July 19 passed an order bringing R-Infra under the ambit of the RTI after observing that though it was a private company, it provided an &quot;essential public service&quot; of electricity and hence, should come under the Act. <br /><br />The order came following a complaint filed by one Anil Galgali. The commission had also directed the company to appoint a public information officer and an appellate officer as per the provisions of the RTI. <br /><br />In its appeal challenging the order, R-Infra said it is not a body or institution of government established or constituted by the Constitution of India. <br /><br />&quot;R-Infra does not fall within the definition of a public authority as either being owned, controlled or substantially financed by the funds provided by the government,&quot; the petition states. <br /><br />It further said that even the Information Commission has admitted that R-Infra is a private company and has not been set up by the government. <br /><br />&quot;Thus, there is no question of the RTI Act being made applicable to R-Infra. The order passed by the commission is liable to be quashed and set aside,&quot; the company said. <br /><br />The petition will come up for hearing in due course of time. Galgali had approached the commission after Reliance Energy declined to provide him information regarding his electricity bills. <br /><br />Galgali had sought the information under the RTI Act, which was rejected, saying the provisions of the Act does not apply to private companies. <br /><br />Galgali had argued before the commission that R-Infra was formed under the Company Act and functioned as a public utility and hence, should come under the ambit of RTI. <br /><br />Accepting his arguments, the commission had observed that the company was given work under the Electricity Act, 2003, and supplying power is a public service under the Act.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 9532,
		'title' => 'Anil Ambani's R-Infra challenges SIC order bringing company under RTI ambit',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<p>
-PTI
</p>
<p>
&nbsp;
</p>
<div align="justify">
Anil Ambani-led Reliance Infrastructure Ltd has challenged an order passed by the State Information Commission bringing the company under the ambit of the Right to Information Act in the Bombay High Court, arguing that it is a private company and not a public authority. <br />
<br />
The SIC on July 19 passed an order bringing R-Infra under the ambit of the RTI after observing that though it was a private company, it provided an &quot;essential public service&quot; of electricity and hence, should come under the Act. <br />
<br />
The order came following a complaint filed by one Anil Galgali. The commission had also directed the company to appoint a public information officer and an appellate officer as per the provisions of the RTI. <br />
<br />
In its appeal challenging the order, R-Infra said it is not a body or institution of government established or constituted by the Constitution of India. <br />
<br />
&quot;R-Infra does not fall within the definition of a public authority as either being owned, controlled or substantially financed by the funds provided by the government,&quot; the petition states. <br />
<br />
It further said that even the Information Commission has admitted that R-Infra is a private company and has not been set up by the government. <br />
<br />
&quot;Thus, there is no question of the RTI Act being made applicable to R-Infra. The order passed by the commission is liable to be quashed and set aside,&quot; the company said. <br />
<br />
The petition will come up for hearing in due course of time. Galgali had approached the commission after Reliance Energy declined to provide him information regarding his electricity bills. <br />
<br />
Galgali had sought the information under the RTI Act, which was rejected, saying the provisions of the Act does not apply to private companies. <br />
<br />
Galgali had argued before the commission that R-Infra was formed under the Company Act and functioned as a public utility and hence, should come under the ambit of RTI. <br />
<br />
Accepting his arguments, the commission had observed that the company was given work under the Electricity Act, 2003, and supplying power is a public service under the Act.
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 19 August, 2011, http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2011-08-19/news/29905144_1_rti-ambit-rti-act-public-information-officer',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'anil-ambanis-r-infra-challenges-sic-order-bringing-company-under-rti-ambit-9641',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 9641,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 9532,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Anil Ambani's R-Infra challenges SIC order bringing company under RTI ambit',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Right to Information',
	'metaDesc' => '
-PTI


&nbsp;


Anil Ambani-led Reliance Infrastructure Ltd has challenged an order passed by the State Information Commission bringing the company under the ambit of the Right to Information Act in the Bombay High Court, arguing that it is a private company and...',
	'disp' => '<p>-PTI</p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">Anil Ambani-led Reliance Infrastructure Ltd has challenged an order passed by the State Information Commission bringing the company under the ambit of the Right to Information Act in the Bombay High Court, arguing that it is a private company and not a public authority. <br /><br />The SIC on July 19 passed an order bringing R-Infra under the ambit of the RTI after observing that though it was a private company, it provided an &quot;essential public service&quot; of electricity and hence, should come under the Act. <br /><br />The order came following a complaint filed by one Anil Galgali. The commission had also directed the company to appoint a public information officer and an appellate officer as per the provisions of the RTI. <br /><br />In its appeal challenging the order, R-Infra said it is not a body or institution of government established or constituted by the Constitution of India. <br /><br />&quot;R-Infra does not fall within the definition of a public authority as either being owned, controlled or substantially financed by the funds provided by the government,&quot; the petition states. <br /><br />It further said that even the Information Commission has admitted that R-Infra is a private company and has not been set up by the government. <br /><br />&quot;Thus, there is no question of the RTI Act being made applicable to R-Infra. The order passed by the commission is liable to be quashed and set aside,&quot; the company said. <br /><br />The petition will come up for hearing in due course of time. Galgali had approached the commission after Reliance Energy declined to provide him information regarding his electricity bills. <br /><br />Galgali had sought the information under the RTI Act, which was rejected, saying the provisions of the Act does not apply to private companies. <br /><br />Galgali had argued before the commission that R-Infra was formed under the Company Act and functioned as a public utility and hence, should come under the ambit of RTI. <br /><br />Accepting his arguments, the commission had observed that the company was given work under the Electricity Act, 2003, and supplying power is a public service under the Act.</div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 9532,
	'title' => 'Anil Ambani's R-Infra challenges SIC order bringing company under RTI ambit',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<p>
-PTI
</p>
<p>
&nbsp;
</p>
<div align="justify">
Anil Ambani-led Reliance Infrastructure Ltd has challenged an order passed by the State Information Commission bringing the company under the ambit of the Right to Information Act in the Bombay High Court, arguing that it is a private company and not a public authority. <br />
<br />
The SIC on July 19 passed an order bringing R-Infra under the ambit of the RTI after observing that though it was a private company, it provided an &quot;essential public service&quot; of electricity and hence, should come under the Act. <br />
<br />
The order came following a complaint filed by one Anil Galgali. The commission had also directed the company to appoint a public information officer and an appellate officer as per the provisions of the RTI. <br />
<br />
In its appeal challenging the order, R-Infra said it is not a body or institution of government established or constituted by the Constitution of India. <br />
<br />
&quot;R-Infra does not fall within the definition of a public authority as either being owned, controlled or substantially financed by the funds provided by the government,&quot; the petition states. <br />
<br />
It further said that even the Information Commission has admitted that R-Infra is a private company and has not been set up by the government. <br />
<br />
&quot;Thus, there is no question of the RTI Act being made applicable to R-Infra. The order passed by the commission is liable to be quashed and set aside,&quot; the company said. <br />
<br />
The petition will come up for hearing in due course of time. Galgali had approached the commission after Reliance Energy declined to provide him information regarding his electricity bills. <br />
<br />
Galgali had sought the information under the RTI Act, which was rejected, saying the provisions of the Act does not apply to private companies. <br />
<br />
Galgali had argued before the commission that R-Infra was formed under the Company Act and functioned as a public utility and hence, should come under the ambit of RTI. <br />
<br />
Accepting his arguments, the commission had observed that the company was given work under the Electricity Act, 2003, and supplying power is a public service under the Act.
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 19 August, 2011, http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2011-08-19/news/29905144_1_rti-ambit-rti-act-public-information-officer',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'anil-ambanis-r-infra-challenges-sic-order-bringing-company-under-rti-ambit-9641',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 9641,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 9532
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Anil Ambani's R-Infra challenges SIC order bringing company under RTI ambit'
$metaKeywords = 'Right to Information'
$metaDesc = '
-PTI


&nbsp;


Anil Ambani-led Reliance Infrastructure Ltd has challenged an order passed by the State Information Commission bringing the company under the ambit of the Right to Information Act in the Bombay High Court, arguing that it is a private company and...'
$disp = '<p>-PTI</p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">Anil Ambani-led Reliance Infrastructure Ltd has challenged an order passed by the State Information Commission bringing the company under the ambit of the Right to Information Act in the Bombay High Court, arguing that it is a private company and not a public authority. <br /><br />The SIC on July 19 passed an order bringing R-Infra under the ambit of the RTI after observing that though it was a private company, it provided an &quot;essential public service&quot; of electricity and hence, should come under the Act. <br /><br />The order came following a complaint filed by one Anil Galgali. The commission had also directed the company to appoint a public information officer and an appellate officer as per the provisions of the RTI. <br /><br />In its appeal challenging the order, R-Infra said it is not a body or institution of government established or constituted by the Constitution of India. <br /><br />&quot;R-Infra does not fall within the definition of a public authority as either being owned, controlled or substantially financed by the funds provided by the government,&quot; the petition states. <br /><br />It further said that even the Information Commission has admitted that R-Infra is a private company and has not been set up by the government. <br /><br />&quot;Thus, there is no question of the RTI Act being made applicable to R-Infra. The order passed by the commission is liable to be quashed and set aside,&quot; the company said. <br /><br />The petition will come up for hearing in due course of time. Galgali had approached the commission after Reliance Energy declined to provide him information regarding his electricity bills. <br /><br />Galgali had sought the information under the RTI Act, which was rejected, saying the provisions of the Act does not apply to private companies. <br /><br />Galgali had argued before the commission that R-Infra was formed under the Company Act and functioned as a public utility and hence, should come under the ambit of RTI. <br /><br />Accepting his arguments, the commission had observed that the company was given work under the Electricity Act, 2003, and supplying power is a public service under the Act.</div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

Anil Ambani's R-Infra challenges SIC order bringing company under RTI ambit

-PTI   Anil Ambani-led Reliance Infrastructure Ltd has challenged an order passed by the State Information Commission bringing the company under the ambit of the Right to Information Act in the Bombay High Court, arguing that it is a private company and not a public authority. The SIC on July 19 passed an order bringing R-Infra under the ambit of the RTI after observing that though it was a private company, it provided an "essential public service" of electricity and hence, should come under the Act. The order came following a complaint filed by one Anil Galgali. The commission had also directed the company to appoint a public information officer and an appellate officer as per the provisions of the RTI. In its appeal challenging the order, R-Infra said it is not a body or institution of government established or constituted by the Constitution of India. "R-Infra does not fall within the definition of a public authority as either being owned, controlled or substantially financed by the funds provided by the government," the petition states. It further said that even the Information Commission has admitted that R-Infra is a private company and has not been set up by the government. "Thus, there is no question of the RTI Act being made applicable to R-Infra. The order passed by the commission is liable to be quashed and set aside," the company said. The petition will come up for hearing in due course of time. Galgali had approached the commission after Reliance Energy declined to provide him information regarding his electricity bills. Galgali had sought the information under the RTI Act, which was rejected, saying the provisions of the Act does not apply to private companies. Galgali had argued before the commission that R-Infra was formed under the Company Act and functioned as a public utility and hence, should come under the ambit of RTI. Accepting his arguments, the commission had observed that the company was given work under the Electricity Act, 2003, and supplying power is a public service under the Act.