Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/apex-court-rap-for-order-evasion-12792/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/apex-court-rap-for-order-evasion-12792/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/apex-court-rap-for-order-evasion-12792/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/apex-court-rap-for-order-evasion-12792/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec32e13dbef-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec32e13dbef-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67ec32e13dbef-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec32e13dbef-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec32e13dbef-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec32e13dbef-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec32e13dbef-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67ec32e13dbef-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67ec32e13dbef-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 12672, 'title' => 'Apex court rap for order evasion', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Supreme Court today expressed anguish over the tendency to circumvent court orders instead of honouring them. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court said this while dealing with contempt petitions filed against some gutkha manufacturers for not abiding by its order to switch to non-plastic sachets. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court had earlier issued contempt notices against Rajeev Kumar, the MD of the Dharampal Satyapal group, which manufactures two popular pan masala brands &mdash; Rajnigandha and Tulsi &mdash; for wilfully disobeying its orders. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court had asked all gutkha and pan masala makers to switch to non-plastic pouches for health reasons and on environmental grounds in an order passed on December 7, 2010. The order was to come into effect from March 1, 2011. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> However, some gutkha makers, the Centre for Public Interest Litigation claimed, had violated this by not producing sachets of pan masala but instead repackaging it in small zip-pouches. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The order was restricted to sachets and not pouches, the lawyer for the manufacturer, Sudhir Chandra Aggarwal, said. &ldquo;Even the Government of India understood it to be limited to sachets and not to pouches which are multi-purpose in use,&rdquo; he claimed. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But the bench, comprising Justices Asok Kumar Ganguly and T.S. Thakur, rejected this explanation. &ldquo;Do you mean to say that use of small sachets is not permissible but larger ones are?&rdquo; Justice Thakur asked. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> CPIL lawyer Prashant Bhushan said the pan masala makers were &ldquo;trying to be too clever by half&rdquo;. If they were not clear on the order, they should have come to the top court for clarifications, he said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Instead, they wrote to the environment and forest ministry seeking a clarification and then procured some legal opinion to show that the plastic packaging was technically not sachets but pouches and continued to manufacture them in plastic packaging. &ldquo;This was mala fide,&rdquo; he contended. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> He sought action against the pan masala makers on this count. Contempt of court is punishable with a jail term of up to six months. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> After the counsel for Dharam Satyapal assured the court that they had since then switched over to non-plastic packaging, Justice Thakur said they should donate some money to some charity or cancer research by way of reparation. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;You have earned so much money (in the two months you violated the court orders). You should donate some money to cancer research to close this (contempt) case,&rdquo; Justice Thakur said.Eight per cent of oral cancer cases in India are attributed to long-term tobacco use. But Justice Ganguly did not agree to this. He expressed anguish over the tendency among most not to abide by orders of the court in &ldquo;letter and spirit&rdquo;. &ldquo;What will happen to the institution then?&rdquo; he wondered. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> He then directed that the case be listed again before Justice G.S. Singhvi and himself for further orders. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 25 January, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1120126/jsp/nation/story_15055211.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'apex-court-rap-for-order-evasion-12792', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 12792, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 12672, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Apex court rap for order evasion', 'metaKeywords' => 'Law and Justice', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Telegraph The Supreme Court today expressed anguish over the tendency to circumvent court orders instead of honouring them. The court said this while dealing with contempt petitions filed against some gutkha manufacturers for not abiding by its order to switch to...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">-The Telegraph</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court today expressed anguish over the tendency to circumvent court orders instead of honouring them.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court said this while dealing with contempt petitions filed against some gutkha manufacturers for not abiding by its order to switch to non-plastic sachets.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court had earlier issued contempt notices against Rajeev Kumar, the MD of the Dharampal Satyapal group, which manufactures two popular pan masala brands &mdash; Rajnigandha and Tulsi &mdash; for wilfully disobeying its orders.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court had asked all gutkha and pan masala makers to switch to non-plastic pouches for health reasons and on environmental grounds in an order passed on December 7, 2010. The order was to come into effect from March 1, 2011.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, some gutkha makers, the Centre for Public Interest Litigation claimed, had violated this by not producing sachets of pan masala but instead repackaging it in small zip-pouches.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The order was restricted to sachets and not pouches, the lawyer for the manufacturer, Sudhir Chandra Aggarwal, said. &ldquo;Even the Government of India understood it to be limited to sachets and not to pouches which are multi-purpose in use,&rdquo; he claimed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But the bench, comprising Justices Asok Kumar Ganguly and T.S. Thakur, rejected this explanation. &ldquo;Do you mean to say that use of small sachets is not permissible but larger ones are?&rdquo; Justice Thakur asked.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">CPIL lawyer Prashant Bhushan said the pan masala makers were &ldquo;trying to be too clever by half&rdquo;. If they were not clear on the order, they should have come to the top court for clarifications, he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Instead, they wrote to the environment and forest ministry seeking a clarification and then procured some legal opinion to show that the plastic packaging was technically not sachets but pouches and continued to manufacture them in plastic packaging. &ldquo;This was mala fide,&rdquo; he contended.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He sought action against the pan masala makers on this count. Contempt of court is punishable with a jail term of up to six months.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">After the counsel for Dharam Satyapal assured the court that they had since then switched over to non-plastic packaging, Justice Thakur said they should donate some money to some charity or cancer research by way of reparation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;You have earned so much money (in the two months you violated the court orders). You should donate some money to cancer research to close this (contempt) case,&rdquo; Justice Thakur said.Eight per cent of oral cancer cases in India are attributed to long-term tobacco use. But Justice Ganguly did not agree to this. He expressed anguish over the tendency among most not to abide by orders of the court in &ldquo;letter and spirit&rdquo;. &ldquo;What will happen to the institution then?&rdquo; he wondered.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He then directed that the case be listed again before Justice G.S. Singhvi and himself for further orders.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 12672, 'title' => 'Apex court rap for order evasion', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Supreme Court today expressed anguish over the tendency to circumvent court orders instead of honouring them. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court said this while dealing with contempt petitions filed against some gutkha manufacturers for not abiding by its order to switch to non-plastic sachets. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court had earlier issued contempt notices against Rajeev Kumar, the MD of the Dharampal Satyapal group, which manufactures two popular pan masala brands &mdash; Rajnigandha and Tulsi &mdash; for wilfully disobeying its orders. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court had asked all gutkha and pan masala makers to switch to non-plastic pouches for health reasons and on environmental grounds in an order passed on December 7, 2010. The order was to come into effect from March 1, 2011. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> However, some gutkha makers, the Centre for Public Interest Litigation claimed, had violated this by not producing sachets of pan masala but instead repackaging it in small zip-pouches. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The order was restricted to sachets and not pouches, the lawyer for the manufacturer, Sudhir Chandra Aggarwal, said. &ldquo;Even the Government of India understood it to be limited to sachets and not to pouches which are multi-purpose in use,&rdquo; he claimed. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But the bench, comprising Justices Asok Kumar Ganguly and T.S. Thakur, rejected this explanation. &ldquo;Do you mean to say that use of small sachets is not permissible but larger ones are?&rdquo; Justice Thakur asked. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> CPIL lawyer Prashant Bhushan said the pan masala makers were &ldquo;trying to be too clever by half&rdquo;. If they were not clear on the order, they should have come to the top court for clarifications, he said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Instead, they wrote to the environment and forest ministry seeking a clarification and then procured some legal opinion to show that the plastic packaging was technically not sachets but pouches and continued to manufacture them in plastic packaging. &ldquo;This was mala fide,&rdquo; he contended. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> He sought action against the pan masala makers on this count. Contempt of court is punishable with a jail term of up to six months. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> After the counsel for Dharam Satyapal assured the court that they had since then switched over to non-plastic packaging, Justice Thakur said they should donate some money to some charity or cancer research by way of reparation. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;You have earned so much money (in the two months you violated the court orders). You should donate some money to cancer research to close this (contempt) case,&rdquo; Justice Thakur said.Eight per cent of oral cancer cases in India are attributed to long-term tobacco use. But Justice Ganguly did not agree to this. He expressed anguish over the tendency among most not to abide by orders of the court in &ldquo;letter and spirit&rdquo;. &ldquo;What will happen to the institution then?&rdquo; he wondered. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> He then directed that the case be listed again before Justice G.S. Singhvi and himself for further orders. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 25 January, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1120126/jsp/nation/story_15055211.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'apex-court-rap-for-order-evasion-12792', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 12792, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 12672 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Apex court rap for order evasion' $metaKeywords = 'Law and Justice' $metaDesc = ' -The Telegraph The Supreme Court today expressed anguish over the tendency to circumvent court orders instead of honouring them. The court said this while dealing with contempt petitions filed against some gutkha manufacturers for not abiding by its order to switch to...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">-The Telegraph</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court today expressed anguish over the tendency to circumvent court orders instead of honouring them.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court said this while dealing with contempt petitions filed against some gutkha manufacturers for not abiding by its order to switch to non-plastic sachets.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court had earlier issued contempt notices against Rajeev Kumar, the MD of the Dharampal Satyapal group, which manufactures two popular pan masala brands &mdash; Rajnigandha and Tulsi &mdash; for wilfully disobeying its orders.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court had asked all gutkha and pan masala makers to switch to non-plastic pouches for health reasons and on environmental grounds in an order passed on December 7, 2010. The order was to come into effect from March 1, 2011.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, some gutkha makers, the Centre for Public Interest Litigation claimed, had violated this by not producing sachets of pan masala but instead repackaging it in small zip-pouches.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The order was restricted to sachets and not pouches, the lawyer for the manufacturer, Sudhir Chandra Aggarwal, said. &ldquo;Even the Government of India understood it to be limited to sachets and not to pouches which are multi-purpose in use,&rdquo; he claimed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But the bench, comprising Justices Asok Kumar Ganguly and T.S. Thakur, rejected this explanation. &ldquo;Do you mean to say that use of small sachets is not permissible but larger ones are?&rdquo; Justice Thakur asked.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">CPIL lawyer Prashant Bhushan said the pan masala makers were &ldquo;trying to be too clever by half&rdquo;. If they were not clear on the order, they should have come to the top court for clarifications, he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Instead, they wrote to the environment and forest ministry seeking a clarification and then procured some legal opinion to show that the plastic packaging was technically not sachets but pouches and continued to manufacture them in plastic packaging. &ldquo;This was mala fide,&rdquo; he contended.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He sought action against the pan masala makers on this count. Contempt of court is punishable with a jail term of up to six months.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">After the counsel for Dharam Satyapal assured the court that they had since then switched over to non-plastic packaging, Justice Thakur said they should donate some money to some charity or cancer research by way of reparation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;You have earned so much money (in the two months you violated the court orders). You should donate some money to cancer research to close this (contempt) case,&rdquo; Justice Thakur said.Eight per cent of oral cancer cases in India are attributed to long-term tobacco use. But Justice Ganguly did not agree to this. He expressed anguish over the tendency among most not to abide by orders of the court in &ldquo;letter and spirit&rdquo;. &ldquo;What will happen to the institution then?&rdquo; he wondered.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He then directed that the case be listed again before Justice G.S. Singhvi and himself for further orders.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/apex-court-rap-for-order-evasion-12792.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Apex court rap for order evasion | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Telegraph The Supreme Court today expressed anguish over the tendency to circumvent court orders instead of honouring them. The court said this while dealing with contempt petitions filed against some gutkha manufacturers for not abiding by its order to switch to..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Apex court rap for order evasion</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">-The Telegraph</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court today expressed anguish over the tendency to circumvent court orders instead of honouring them.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court said this while dealing with contempt petitions filed against some gutkha manufacturers for not abiding by its order to switch to non-plastic sachets.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court had earlier issued contempt notices against Rajeev Kumar, the MD of the Dharampal Satyapal group, which manufactures two popular pan masala brands — Rajnigandha and Tulsi — for wilfully disobeying its orders.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court had asked all gutkha and pan masala makers to switch to non-plastic pouches for health reasons and on environmental grounds in an order passed on December 7, 2010. The order was to come into effect from March 1, 2011.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, some gutkha makers, the Centre for Public Interest Litigation claimed, had violated this by not producing sachets of pan masala but instead repackaging it in small zip-pouches.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The order was restricted to sachets and not pouches, the lawyer for the manufacturer, Sudhir Chandra Aggarwal, said. “Even the Government of India understood it to be limited to sachets and not to pouches which are multi-purpose in use,” he claimed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But the bench, comprising Justices Asok Kumar Ganguly and T.S. Thakur, rejected this explanation. “Do you mean to say that use of small sachets is not permissible but larger ones are?” Justice Thakur asked.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">CPIL lawyer Prashant Bhushan said the pan masala makers were “trying to be too clever by half”. If they were not clear on the order, they should have come to the top court for clarifications, he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Instead, they wrote to the environment and forest ministry seeking a clarification and then procured some legal opinion to show that the plastic packaging was technically not sachets but pouches and continued to manufacture them in plastic packaging. “This was mala fide,” he contended.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He sought action against the pan masala makers on this count. Contempt of court is punishable with a jail term of up to six months.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">After the counsel for Dharam Satyapal assured the court that they had since then switched over to non-plastic packaging, Justice Thakur said they should donate some money to some charity or cancer research by way of reparation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“You have earned so much money (in the two months you violated the court orders). You should donate some money to cancer research to close this (contempt) case,” Justice Thakur said.Eight per cent of oral cancer cases in India are attributed to long-term tobacco use. But Justice Ganguly did not agree to this. He expressed anguish over the tendency among most not to abide by orders of the court in “letter and spirit”. “What will happen to the institution then?” he wondered.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He then directed that the case be listed again before Justice G.S. Singhvi and himself for further orders.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec32e13dbef-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec32e13dbef-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67ec32e13dbef-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec32e13dbef-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec32e13dbef-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec32e13dbef-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec32e13dbef-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67ec32e13dbef-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67ec32e13dbef-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 12672, 'title' => 'Apex court rap for order evasion', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Supreme Court today expressed anguish over the tendency to circumvent court orders instead of honouring them. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court said this while dealing with contempt petitions filed against some gutkha manufacturers for not abiding by its order to switch to non-plastic sachets. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court had earlier issued contempt notices against Rajeev Kumar, the MD of the Dharampal Satyapal group, which manufactures two popular pan masala brands &mdash; Rajnigandha and Tulsi &mdash; for wilfully disobeying its orders. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court had asked all gutkha and pan masala makers to switch to non-plastic pouches for health reasons and on environmental grounds in an order passed on December 7, 2010. The order was to come into effect from March 1, 2011. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> However, some gutkha makers, the Centre for Public Interest Litigation claimed, had violated this by not producing sachets of pan masala but instead repackaging it in small zip-pouches. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The order was restricted to sachets and not pouches, the lawyer for the manufacturer, Sudhir Chandra Aggarwal, said. &ldquo;Even the Government of India understood it to be limited to sachets and not to pouches which are multi-purpose in use,&rdquo; he claimed. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But the bench, comprising Justices Asok Kumar Ganguly and T.S. Thakur, rejected this explanation. &ldquo;Do you mean to say that use of small sachets is not permissible but larger ones are?&rdquo; Justice Thakur asked. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> CPIL lawyer Prashant Bhushan said the pan masala makers were &ldquo;trying to be too clever by half&rdquo;. If they were not clear on the order, they should have come to the top court for clarifications, he said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Instead, they wrote to the environment and forest ministry seeking a clarification and then procured some legal opinion to show that the plastic packaging was technically not sachets but pouches and continued to manufacture them in plastic packaging. &ldquo;This was mala fide,&rdquo; he contended. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> He sought action against the pan masala makers on this count. Contempt of court is punishable with a jail term of up to six months. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> After the counsel for Dharam Satyapal assured the court that they had since then switched over to non-plastic packaging, Justice Thakur said they should donate some money to some charity or cancer research by way of reparation. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;You have earned so much money (in the two months you violated the court orders). You should donate some money to cancer research to close this (contempt) case,&rdquo; Justice Thakur said.Eight per cent of oral cancer cases in India are attributed to long-term tobacco use. But Justice Ganguly did not agree to this. He expressed anguish over the tendency among most not to abide by orders of the court in &ldquo;letter and spirit&rdquo;. &ldquo;What will happen to the institution then?&rdquo; he wondered. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> He then directed that the case be listed again before Justice G.S. Singhvi and himself for further orders. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 25 January, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1120126/jsp/nation/story_15055211.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'apex-court-rap-for-order-evasion-12792', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 12792, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 12672, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Apex court rap for order evasion', 'metaKeywords' => 'Law and Justice', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Telegraph The Supreme Court today expressed anguish over the tendency to circumvent court orders instead of honouring them. The court said this while dealing with contempt petitions filed against some gutkha manufacturers for not abiding by its order to switch to...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">-The Telegraph</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court today expressed anguish over the tendency to circumvent court orders instead of honouring them.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court said this while dealing with contempt petitions filed against some gutkha manufacturers for not abiding by its order to switch to non-plastic sachets.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court had earlier issued contempt notices against Rajeev Kumar, the MD of the Dharampal Satyapal group, which manufactures two popular pan masala brands &mdash; Rajnigandha and Tulsi &mdash; for wilfully disobeying its orders.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court had asked all gutkha and pan masala makers to switch to non-plastic pouches for health reasons and on environmental grounds in an order passed on December 7, 2010. The order was to come into effect from March 1, 2011.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, some gutkha makers, the Centre for Public Interest Litigation claimed, had violated this by not producing sachets of pan masala but instead repackaging it in small zip-pouches.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The order was restricted to sachets and not pouches, the lawyer for the manufacturer, Sudhir Chandra Aggarwal, said. &ldquo;Even the Government of India understood it to be limited to sachets and not to pouches which are multi-purpose in use,&rdquo; he claimed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But the bench, comprising Justices Asok Kumar Ganguly and T.S. Thakur, rejected this explanation. &ldquo;Do you mean to say that use of small sachets is not permissible but larger ones are?&rdquo; Justice Thakur asked.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">CPIL lawyer Prashant Bhushan said the pan masala makers were &ldquo;trying to be too clever by half&rdquo;. If they were not clear on the order, they should have come to the top court for clarifications, he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Instead, they wrote to the environment and forest ministry seeking a clarification and then procured some legal opinion to show that the plastic packaging was technically not sachets but pouches and continued to manufacture them in plastic packaging. &ldquo;This was mala fide,&rdquo; he contended.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He sought action against the pan masala makers on this count. Contempt of court is punishable with a jail term of up to six months.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">After the counsel for Dharam Satyapal assured the court that they had since then switched over to non-plastic packaging, Justice Thakur said they should donate some money to some charity or cancer research by way of reparation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;You have earned so much money (in the two months you violated the court orders). You should donate some money to cancer research to close this (contempt) case,&rdquo; Justice Thakur said.Eight per cent of oral cancer cases in India are attributed to long-term tobacco use. But Justice Ganguly did not agree to this. He expressed anguish over the tendency among most not to abide by orders of the court in &ldquo;letter and spirit&rdquo;. &ldquo;What will happen to the institution then?&rdquo; he wondered.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He then directed that the case be listed again before Justice G.S. Singhvi and himself for further orders.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 12672, 'title' => 'Apex court rap for order evasion', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Supreme Court today expressed anguish over the tendency to circumvent court orders instead of honouring them. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court said this while dealing with contempt petitions filed against some gutkha manufacturers for not abiding by its order to switch to non-plastic sachets. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court had earlier issued contempt notices against Rajeev Kumar, the MD of the Dharampal Satyapal group, which manufactures two popular pan masala brands &mdash; Rajnigandha and Tulsi &mdash; for wilfully disobeying its orders. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court had asked all gutkha and pan masala makers to switch to non-plastic pouches for health reasons and on environmental grounds in an order passed on December 7, 2010. The order was to come into effect from March 1, 2011. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> However, some gutkha makers, the Centre for Public Interest Litigation claimed, had violated this by not producing sachets of pan masala but instead repackaging it in small zip-pouches. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The order was restricted to sachets and not pouches, the lawyer for the manufacturer, Sudhir Chandra Aggarwal, said. &ldquo;Even the Government of India understood it to be limited to sachets and not to pouches which are multi-purpose in use,&rdquo; he claimed. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But the bench, comprising Justices Asok Kumar Ganguly and T.S. Thakur, rejected this explanation. &ldquo;Do you mean to say that use of small sachets is not permissible but larger ones are?&rdquo; Justice Thakur asked. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> CPIL lawyer Prashant Bhushan said the pan masala makers were &ldquo;trying to be too clever by half&rdquo;. If they were not clear on the order, they should have come to the top court for clarifications, he said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Instead, they wrote to the environment and forest ministry seeking a clarification and then procured some legal opinion to show that the plastic packaging was technically not sachets but pouches and continued to manufacture them in plastic packaging. &ldquo;This was mala fide,&rdquo; he contended. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> He sought action against the pan masala makers on this count. Contempt of court is punishable with a jail term of up to six months. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> After the counsel for Dharam Satyapal assured the court that they had since then switched over to non-plastic packaging, Justice Thakur said they should donate some money to some charity or cancer research by way of reparation. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;You have earned so much money (in the two months you violated the court orders). You should donate some money to cancer research to close this (contempt) case,&rdquo; Justice Thakur said.Eight per cent of oral cancer cases in India are attributed to long-term tobacco use. But Justice Ganguly did not agree to this. He expressed anguish over the tendency among most not to abide by orders of the court in &ldquo;letter and spirit&rdquo;. &ldquo;What will happen to the institution then?&rdquo; he wondered. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> He then directed that the case be listed again before Justice G.S. Singhvi and himself for further orders. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 25 January, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1120126/jsp/nation/story_15055211.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'apex-court-rap-for-order-evasion-12792', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 12792, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 12672 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Apex court rap for order evasion' $metaKeywords = 'Law and Justice' $metaDesc = ' -The Telegraph The Supreme Court today expressed anguish over the tendency to circumvent court orders instead of honouring them. The court said this while dealing with contempt petitions filed against some gutkha manufacturers for not abiding by its order to switch to...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">-The Telegraph</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court today expressed anguish over the tendency to circumvent court orders instead of honouring them.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court said this while dealing with contempt petitions filed against some gutkha manufacturers for not abiding by its order to switch to non-plastic sachets.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court had earlier issued contempt notices against Rajeev Kumar, the MD of the Dharampal Satyapal group, which manufactures two popular pan masala brands &mdash; Rajnigandha and Tulsi &mdash; for wilfully disobeying its orders.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court had asked all gutkha and pan masala makers to switch to non-plastic pouches for health reasons and on environmental grounds in an order passed on December 7, 2010. The order was to come into effect from March 1, 2011.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, some gutkha makers, the Centre for Public Interest Litigation claimed, had violated this by not producing sachets of pan masala but instead repackaging it in small zip-pouches.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The order was restricted to sachets and not pouches, the lawyer for the manufacturer, Sudhir Chandra Aggarwal, said. &ldquo;Even the Government of India understood it to be limited to sachets and not to pouches which are multi-purpose in use,&rdquo; he claimed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But the bench, comprising Justices Asok Kumar Ganguly and T.S. Thakur, rejected this explanation. &ldquo;Do you mean to say that use of small sachets is not permissible but larger ones are?&rdquo; Justice Thakur asked.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">CPIL lawyer Prashant Bhushan said the pan masala makers were &ldquo;trying to be too clever by half&rdquo;. If they were not clear on the order, they should have come to the top court for clarifications, he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Instead, they wrote to the environment and forest ministry seeking a clarification and then procured some legal opinion to show that the plastic packaging was technically not sachets but pouches and continued to manufacture them in plastic packaging. &ldquo;This was mala fide,&rdquo; he contended.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He sought action against the pan masala makers on this count. Contempt of court is punishable with a jail term of up to six months.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">After the counsel for Dharam Satyapal assured the court that they had since then switched over to non-plastic packaging, Justice Thakur said they should donate some money to some charity or cancer research by way of reparation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;You have earned so much money (in the two months you violated the court orders). You should donate some money to cancer research to close this (contempt) case,&rdquo; Justice Thakur said.Eight per cent of oral cancer cases in India are attributed to long-term tobacco use. But Justice Ganguly did not agree to this. He expressed anguish over the tendency among most not to abide by orders of the court in &ldquo;letter and spirit&rdquo;. &ldquo;What will happen to the institution then?&rdquo; he wondered.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He then directed that the case be listed again before Justice G.S. Singhvi and himself for further orders.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/apex-court-rap-for-order-evasion-12792.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Apex court rap for order evasion | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Telegraph The Supreme Court today expressed anguish over the tendency to circumvent court orders instead of honouring them. The court said this while dealing with contempt petitions filed against some gutkha manufacturers for not abiding by its order to switch to..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Apex court rap for order evasion</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">-The Telegraph</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court today expressed anguish over the tendency to circumvent court orders instead of honouring them.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court said this while dealing with contempt petitions filed against some gutkha manufacturers for not abiding by its order to switch to non-plastic sachets.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court had earlier issued contempt notices against Rajeev Kumar, the MD of the Dharampal Satyapal group, which manufactures two popular pan masala brands — Rajnigandha and Tulsi — for wilfully disobeying its orders.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court had asked all gutkha and pan masala makers to switch to non-plastic pouches for health reasons and on environmental grounds in an order passed on December 7, 2010. The order was to come into effect from March 1, 2011.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, some gutkha makers, the Centre for Public Interest Litigation claimed, had violated this by not producing sachets of pan masala but instead repackaging it in small zip-pouches.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The order was restricted to sachets and not pouches, the lawyer for the manufacturer, Sudhir Chandra Aggarwal, said. “Even the Government of India understood it to be limited to sachets and not to pouches which are multi-purpose in use,” he claimed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But the bench, comprising Justices Asok Kumar Ganguly and T.S. Thakur, rejected this explanation. “Do you mean to say that use of small sachets is not permissible but larger ones are?” Justice Thakur asked.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">CPIL lawyer Prashant Bhushan said the pan masala makers were “trying to be too clever by half”. If they were not clear on the order, they should have come to the top court for clarifications, he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Instead, they wrote to the environment and forest ministry seeking a clarification and then procured some legal opinion to show that the plastic packaging was technically not sachets but pouches and continued to manufacture them in plastic packaging. “This was mala fide,” he contended.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He sought action against the pan masala makers on this count. Contempt of court is punishable with a jail term of up to six months.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">After the counsel for Dharam Satyapal assured the court that they had since then switched over to non-plastic packaging, Justice Thakur said they should donate some money to some charity or cancer research by way of reparation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“You have earned so much money (in the two months you violated the court orders). You should donate some money to cancer research to close this (contempt) case,” Justice Thakur said.Eight per cent of oral cancer cases in India are attributed to long-term tobacco use. But Justice Ganguly did not agree to this. He expressed anguish over the tendency among most not to abide by orders of the court in “letter and spirit”. “What will happen to the institution then?” he wondered.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He then directed that the case be listed again before Justice G.S. Singhvi and himself for further orders.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec32e13dbef-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec32e13dbef-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67ec32e13dbef-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec32e13dbef-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec32e13dbef-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec32e13dbef-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ec32e13dbef-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67ec32e13dbef-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67ec32e13dbef-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 12672, 'title' => 'Apex court rap for order evasion', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Supreme Court today expressed anguish over the tendency to circumvent court orders instead of honouring them. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court said this while dealing with contempt petitions filed against some gutkha manufacturers for not abiding by its order to switch to non-plastic sachets. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court had earlier issued contempt notices against Rajeev Kumar, the MD of the Dharampal Satyapal group, which manufactures two popular pan masala brands &mdash; Rajnigandha and Tulsi &mdash; for wilfully disobeying its orders. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court had asked all gutkha and pan masala makers to switch to non-plastic pouches for health reasons and on environmental grounds in an order passed on December 7, 2010. The order was to come into effect from March 1, 2011. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> However, some gutkha makers, the Centre for Public Interest Litigation claimed, had violated this by not producing sachets of pan masala but instead repackaging it in small zip-pouches. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The order was restricted to sachets and not pouches, the lawyer for the manufacturer, Sudhir Chandra Aggarwal, said. &ldquo;Even the Government of India understood it to be limited to sachets and not to pouches which are multi-purpose in use,&rdquo; he claimed. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But the bench, comprising Justices Asok Kumar Ganguly and T.S. Thakur, rejected this explanation. &ldquo;Do you mean to say that use of small sachets is not permissible but larger ones are?&rdquo; Justice Thakur asked. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> CPIL lawyer Prashant Bhushan said the pan masala makers were &ldquo;trying to be too clever by half&rdquo;. If they were not clear on the order, they should have come to the top court for clarifications, he said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Instead, they wrote to the environment and forest ministry seeking a clarification and then procured some legal opinion to show that the plastic packaging was technically not sachets but pouches and continued to manufacture them in plastic packaging. &ldquo;This was mala fide,&rdquo; he contended. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> He sought action against the pan masala makers on this count. Contempt of court is punishable with a jail term of up to six months. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> After the counsel for Dharam Satyapal assured the court that they had since then switched over to non-plastic packaging, Justice Thakur said they should donate some money to some charity or cancer research by way of reparation. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;You have earned so much money (in the two months you violated the court orders). You should donate some money to cancer research to close this (contempt) case,&rdquo; Justice Thakur said.Eight per cent of oral cancer cases in India are attributed to long-term tobacco use. But Justice Ganguly did not agree to this. He expressed anguish over the tendency among most not to abide by orders of the court in &ldquo;letter and spirit&rdquo;. &ldquo;What will happen to the institution then?&rdquo; he wondered. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> He then directed that the case be listed again before Justice G.S. Singhvi and himself for further orders. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 25 January, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1120126/jsp/nation/story_15055211.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'apex-court-rap-for-order-evasion-12792', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 12792, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 12672, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Apex court rap for order evasion', 'metaKeywords' => 'Law and Justice', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Telegraph The Supreme Court today expressed anguish over the tendency to circumvent court orders instead of honouring them. The court said this while dealing with contempt petitions filed against some gutkha manufacturers for not abiding by its order to switch to...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">-The Telegraph</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court today expressed anguish over the tendency to circumvent court orders instead of honouring them.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court said this while dealing with contempt petitions filed against some gutkha manufacturers for not abiding by its order to switch to non-plastic sachets.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court had earlier issued contempt notices against Rajeev Kumar, the MD of the Dharampal Satyapal group, which manufactures two popular pan masala brands &mdash; Rajnigandha and Tulsi &mdash; for wilfully disobeying its orders.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court had asked all gutkha and pan masala makers to switch to non-plastic pouches for health reasons and on environmental grounds in an order passed on December 7, 2010. The order was to come into effect from March 1, 2011.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, some gutkha makers, the Centre for Public Interest Litigation claimed, had violated this by not producing sachets of pan masala but instead repackaging it in small zip-pouches.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The order was restricted to sachets and not pouches, the lawyer for the manufacturer, Sudhir Chandra Aggarwal, said. &ldquo;Even the Government of India understood it to be limited to sachets and not to pouches which are multi-purpose in use,&rdquo; he claimed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But the bench, comprising Justices Asok Kumar Ganguly and T.S. Thakur, rejected this explanation. &ldquo;Do you mean to say that use of small sachets is not permissible but larger ones are?&rdquo; Justice Thakur asked.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">CPIL lawyer Prashant Bhushan said the pan masala makers were &ldquo;trying to be too clever by half&rdquo;. If they were not clear on the order, they should have come to the top court for clarifications, he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Instead, they wrote to the environment and forest ministry seeking a clarification and then procured some legal opinion to show that the plastic packaging was technically not sachets but pouches and continued to manufacture them in plastic packaging. &ldquo;This was mala fide,&rdquo; he contended.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He sought action against the pan masala makers on this count. Contempt of court is punishable with a jail term of up to six months.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">After the counsel for Dharam Satyapal assured the court that they had since then switched over to non-plastic packaging, Justice Thakur said they should donate some money to some charity or cancer research by way of reparation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;You have earned so much money (in the two months you violated the court orders). You should donate some money to cancer research to close this (contempt) case,&rdquo; Justice Thakur said.Eight per cent of oral cancer cases in India are attributed to long-term tobacco use. But Justice Ganguly did not agree to this. He expressed anguish over the tendency among most not to abide by orders of the court in &ldquo;letter and spirit&rdquo;. &ldquo;What will happen to the institution then?&rdquo; he wondered.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He then directed that the case be listed again before Justice G.S. Singhvi and himself for further orders.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 12672, 'title' => 'Apex court rap for order evasion', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Supreme Court today expressed anguish over the tendency to circumvent court orders instead of honouring them. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court said this while dealing with contempt petitions filed against some gutkha manufacturers for not abiding by its order to switch to non-plastic sachets. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court had earlier issued contempt notices against Rajeev Kumar, the MD of the Dharampal Satyapal group, which manufactures two popular pan masala brands &mdash; Rajnigandha and Tulsi &mdash; for wilfully disobeying its orders. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court had asked all gutkha and pan masala makers to switch to non-plastic pouches for health reasons and on environmental grounds in an order passed on December 7, 2010. The order was to come into effect from March 1, 2011. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> However, some gutkha makers, the Centre for Public Interest Litigation claimed, had violated this by not producing sachets of pan masala but instead repackaging it in small zip-pouches. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The order was restricted to sachets and not pouches, the lawyer for the manufacturer, Sudhir Chandra Aggarwal, said. &ldquo;Even the Government of India understood it to be limited to sachets and not to pouches which are multi-purpose in use,&rdquo; he claimed. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But the bench, comprising Justices Asok Kumar Ganguly and T.S. Thakur, rejected this explanation. &ldquo;Do you mean to say that use of small sachets is not permissible but larger ones are?&rdquo; Justice Thakur asked. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> CPIL lawyer Prashant Bhushan said the pan masala makers were &ldquo;trying to be too clever by half&rdquo;. If they were not clear on the order, they should have come to the top court for clarifications, he said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Instead, they wrote to the environment and forest ministry seeking a clarification and then procured some legal opinion to show that the plastic packaging was technically not sachets but pouches and continued to manufacture them in plastic packaging. &ldquo;This was mala fide,&rdquo; he contended. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> He sought action against the pan masala makers on this count. Contempt of court is punishable with a jail term of up to six months. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> After the counsel for Dharam Satyapal assured the court that they had since then switched over to non-plastic packaging, Justice Thakur said they should donate some money to some charity or cancer research by way of reparation. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &ldquo;You have earned so much money (in the two months you violated the court orders). You should donate some money to cancer research to close this (contempt) case,&rdquo; Justice Thakur said.Eight per cent of oral cancer cases in India are attributed to long-term tobacco use. But Justice Ganguly did not agree to this. He expressed anguish over the tendency among most not to abide by orders of the court in &ldquo;letter and spirit&rdquo;. &ldquo;What will happen to the institution then?&rdquo; he wondered. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> He then directed that the case be listed again before Justice G.S. Singhvi and himself for further orders. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 25 January, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1120126/jsp/nation/story_15055211.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'apex-court-rap-for-order-evasion-12792', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 12792, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 12672 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Apex court rap for order evasion' $metaKeywords = 'Law and Justice' $metaDesc = ' -The Telegraph The Supreme Court today expressed anguish over the tendency to circumvent court orders instead of honouring them. The court said this while dealing with contempt petitions filed against some gutkha manufacturers for not abiding by its order to switch to...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">-The Telegraph</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court today expressed anguish over the tendency to circumvent court orders instead of honouring them.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court said this while dealing with contempt petitions filed against some gutkha manufacturers for not abiding by its order to switch to non-plastic sachets.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court had earlier issued contempt notices against Rajeev Kumar, the MD of the Dharampal Satyapal group, which manufactures two popular pan masala brands &mdash; Rajnigandha and Tulsi &mdash; for wilfully disobeying its orders.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court had asked all gutkha and pan masala makers to switch to non-plastic pouches for health reasons and on environmental grounds in an order passed on December 7, 2010. The order was to come into effect from March 1, 2011.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, some gutkha makers, the Centre for Public Interest Litigation claimed, had violated this by not producing sachets of pan masala but instead repackaging it in small zip-pouches.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The order was restricted to sachets and not pouches, the lawyer for the manufacturer, Sudhir Chandra Aggarwal, said. &ldquo;Even the Government of India understood it to be limited to sachets and not to pouches which are multi-purpose in use,&rdquo; he claimed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But the bench, comprising Justices Asok Kumar Ganguly and T.S. Thakur, rejected this explanation. &ldquo;Do you mean to say that use of small sachets is not permissible but larger ones are?&rdquo; Justice Thakur asked.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">CPIL lawyer Prashant Bhushan said the pan masala makers were &ldquo;trying to be too clever by half&rdquo;. If they were not clear on the order, they should have come to the top court for clarifications, he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Instead, they wrote to the environment and forest ministry seeking a clarification and then procured some legal opinion to show that the plastic packaging was technically not sachets but pouches and continued to manufacture them in plastic packaging. &ldquo;This was mala fide,&rdquo; he contended.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He sought action against the pan masala makers on this count. Contempt of court is punishable with a jail term of up to six months.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">After the counsel for Dharam Satyapal assured the court that they had since then switched over to non-plastic packaging, Justice Thakur said they should donate some money to some charity or cancer research by way of reparation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&ldquo;You have earned so much money (in the two months you violated the court orders). You should donate some money to cancer research to close this (contempt) case,&rdquo; Justice Thakur said.Eight per cent of oral cancer cases in India are attributed to long-term tobacco use. But Justice Ganguly did not agree to this. He expressed anguish over the tendency among most not to abide by orders of the court in &ldquo;letter and spirit&rdquo;. &ldquo;What will happen to the institution then?&rdquo; he wondered.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He then directed that the case be listed again before Justice G.S. Singhvi and himself for further orders.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/apex-court-rap-for-order-evasion-12792.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Apex court rap for order evasion | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Telegraph The Supreme Court today expressed anguish over the tendency to circumvent court orders instead of honouring them. The court said this while dealing with contempt petitions filed against some gutkha manufacturers for not abiding by its order to switch to..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Apex court rap for order evasion</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">-The Telegraph</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court today expressed anguish over the tendency to circumvent court orders instead of honouring them.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court said this while dealing with contempt petitions filed against some gutkha manufacturers for not abiding by its order to switch to non-plastic sachets.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court had earlier issued contempt notices against Rajeev Kumar, the MD of the Dharampal Satyapal group, which manufactures two popular pan masala brands — Rajnigandha and Tulsi — for wilfully disobeying its orders.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court had asked all gutkha and pan masala makers to switch to non-plastic pouches for health reasons and on environmental grounds in an order passed on December 7, 2010. The order was to come into effect from March 1, 2011.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, some gutkha makers, the Centre for Public Interest Litigation claimed, had violated this by not producing sachets of pan masala but instead repackaging it in small zip-pouches.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The order was restricted to sachets and not pouches, the lawyer for the manufacturer, Sudhir Chandra Aggarwal, said. “Even the Government of India understood it to be limited to sachets and not to pouches which are multi-purpose in use,” he claimed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But the bench, comprising Justices Asok Kumar Ganguly and T.S. Thakur, rejected this explanation. “Do you mean to say that use of small sachets is not permissible but larger ones are?” Justice Thakur asked.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">CPIL lawyer Prashant Bhushan said the pan masala makers were “trying to be too clever by half”. If they were not clear on the order, they should have come to the top court for clarifications, he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Instead, they wrote to the environment and forest ministry seeking a clarification and then procured some legal opinion to show that the plastic packaging was technically not sachets but pouches and continued to manufacture them in plastic packaging. “This was mala fide,” he contended.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He sought action against the pan masala makers on this count. Contempt of court is punishable with a jail term of up to six months.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">After the counsel for Dharam Satyapal assured the court that they had since then switched over to non-plastic packaging, Justice Thakur said they should donate some money to some charity or cancer research by way of reparation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“You have earned so much money (in the two months you violated the court orders). You should donate some money to cancer research to close this (contempt) case,” Justice Thakur said.Eight per cent of oral cancer cases in India are attributed to long-term tobacco use. But Justice Ganguly did not agree to this. He expressed anguish over the tendency among most not to abide by orders of the court in “letter and spirit”. “What will happen to the institution then?” he wondered.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He then directed that the case be listed again before Justice G.S. Singhvi and himself for further orders.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 12672, 'title' => 'Apex court rap for order evasion', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Supreme Court today expressed anguish over the tendency to circumvent court orders instead of honouring them. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court said this while dealing with contempt petitions filed against some gutkha manufacturers for not abiding by its order to switch to non-plastic sachets. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court had earlier issued contempt notices against Rajeev Kumar, the MD of the Dharampal Satyapal group, which manufactures two popular pan masala brands — Rajnigandha and Tulsi — for wilfully disobeying its orders. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court had asked all gutkha and pan masala makers to switch to non-plastic pouches for health reasons and on environmental grounds in an order passed on December 7, 2010. The order was to come into effect from March 1, 2011. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> However, some gutkha makers, the Centre for Public Interest Litigation claimed, had violated this by not producing sachets of pan masala but instead repackaging it in small zip-pouches. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The order was restricted to sachets and not pouches, the lawyer for the manufacturer, Sudhir Chandra Aggarwal, said. “Even the Government of India understood it to be limited to sachets and not to pouches which are multi-purpose in use,” he claimed. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But the bench, comprising Justices Asok Kumar Ganguly and T.S. Thakur, rejected this explanation. “Do you mean to say that use of small sachets is not permissible but larger ones are?” Justice Thakur asked. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> CPIL lawyer Prashant Bhushan said the pan masala makers were “trying to be too clever by half”. If they were not clear on the order, they should have come to the top court for clarifications, he said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Instead, they wrote to the environment and forest ministry seeking a clarification and then procured some legal opinion to show that the plastic packaging was technically not sachets but pouches and continued to manufacture them in plastic packaging. “This was mala fide,” he contended. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> He sought action against the pan masala makers on this count. Contempt of court is punishable with a jail term of up to six months. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> After the counsel for Dharam Satyapal assured the court that they had since then switched over to non-plastic packaging, Justice Thakur said they should donate some money to some charity or cancer research by way of reparation. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> “You have earned so much money (in the two months you violated the court orders). You should donate some money to cancer research to close this (contempt) case,” Justice Thakur said.Eight per cent of oral cancer cases in India are attributed to long-term tobacco use. But Justice Ganguly did not agree to this. He expressed anguish over the tendency among most not to abide by orders of the court in “letter and spirit”. “What will happen to the institution then?” he wondered. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> He then directed that the case be listed again before Justice G.S. Singhvi and himself for further orders. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 25 January, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1120126/jsp/nation/story_15055211.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'apex-court-rap-for-order-evasion-12792', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 12792, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 12672, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Apex court rap for order evasion', 'metaKeywords' => 'Law and Justice', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Telegraph The Supreme Court today expressed anguish over the tendency to circumvent court orders instead of honouring them. The court said this while dealing with contempt petitions filed against some gutkha manufacturers for not abiding by its order to switch to...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">-The Telegraph</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court today expressed anguish over the tendency to circumvent court orders instead of honouring them.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court said this while dealing with contempt petitions filed against some gutkha manufacturers for not abiding by its order to switch to non-plastic sachets.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court had earlier issued contempt notices against Rajeev Kumar, the MD of the Dharampal Satyapal group, which manufactures two popular pan masala brands — Rajnigandha and Tulsi — for wilfully disobeying its orders.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court had asked all gutkha and pan masala makers to switch to non-plastic pouches for health reasons and on environmental grounds in an order passed on December 7, 2010. The order was to come into effect from March 1, 2011.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, some gutkha makers, the Centre for Public Interest Litigation claimed, had violated this by not producing sachets of pan masala but instead repackaging it in small zip-pouches.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The order was restricted to sachets and not pouches, the lawyer for the manufacturer, Sudhir Chandra Aggarwal, said. “Even the Government of India understood it to be limited to sachets and not to pouches which are multi-purpose in use,” he claimed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But the bench, comprising Justices Asok Kumar Ganguly and T.S. Thakur, rejected this explanation. “Do you mean to say that use of small sachets is not permissible but larger ones are?” Justice Thakur asked.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">CPIL lawyer Prashant Bhushan said the pan masala makers were “trying to be too clever by half”. If they were not clear on the order, they should have come to the top court for clarifications, he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Instead, they wrote to the environment and forest ministry seeking a clarification and then procured some legal opinion to show that the plastic packaging was technically not sachets but pouches and continued to manufacture them in plastic packaging. “This was mala fide,” he contended.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He sought action against the pan masala makers on this count. Contempt of court is punishable with a jail term of up to six months.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">After the counsel for Dharam Satyapal assured the court that they had since then switched over to non-plastic packaging, Justice Thakur said they should donate some money to some charity or cancer research by way of reparation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“You have earned so much money (in the two months you violated the court orders). You should donate some money to cancer research to close this (contempt) case,” Justice Thakur said.Eight per cent of oral cancer cases in India are attributed to long-term tobacco use. But Justice Ganguly did not agree to this. He expressed anguish over the tendency among most not to abide by orders of the court in “letter and spirit”. “What will happen to the institution then?” he wondered.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He then directed that the case be listed again before Justice G.S. Singhvi and himself for further orders.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 12672, 'title' => 'Apex court rap for order evasion', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> -The Telegraph </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The Supreme Court today expressed anguish over the tendency to circumvent court orders instead of honouring them. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court said this while dealing with contempt petitions filed against some gutkha manufacturers for not abiding by its order to switch to non-plastic sachets. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court had earlier issued contempt notices against Rajeev Kumar, the MD of the Dharampal Satyapal group, which manufactures two popular pan masala brands — Rajnigandha and Tulsi — for wilfully disobeying its orders. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The court had asked all gutkha and pan masala makers to switch to non-plastic pouches for health reasons and on environmental grounds in an order passed on December 7, 2010. The order was to come into effect from March 1, 2011. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> However, some gutkha makers, the Centre for Public Interest Litigation claimed, had violated this by not producing sachets of pan masala but instead repackaging it in small zip-pouches. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The order was restricted to sachets and not pouches, the lawyer for the manufacturer, Sudhir Chandra Aggarwal, said. “Even the Government of India understood it to be limited to sachets and not to pouches which are multi-purpose in use,” he claimed. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But the bench, comprising Justices Asok Kumar Ganguly and T.S. Thakur, rejected this explanation. “Do you mean to say that use of small sachets is not permissible but larger ones are?” Justice Thakur asked. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> CPIL lawyer Prashant Bhushan said the pan masala makers were “trying to be too clever by half”. If they were not clear on the order, they should have come to the top court for clarifications, he said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Instead, they wrote to the environment and forest ministry seeking a clarification and then procured some legal opinion to show that the plastic packaging was technically not sachets but pouches and continued to manufacture them in plastic packaging. “This was mala fide,” he contended. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> He sought action against the pan masala makers on this count. Contempt of court is punishable with a jail term of up to six months. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> After the counsel for Dharam Satyapal assured the court that they had since then switched over to non-plastic packaging, Justice Thakur said they should donate some money to some charity or cancer research by way of reparation. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> “You have earned so much money (in the two months you violated the court orders). You should donate some money to cancer research to close this (contempt) case,” Justice Thakur said.Eight per cent of oral cancer cases in India are attributed to long-term tobacco use. But Justice Ganguly did not agree to this. He expressed anguish over the tendency among most not to abide by orders of the court in “letter and spirit”. “What will happen to the institution then?” he wondered. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> He then directed that the case be listed again before Justice G.S. Singhvi and himself for further orders. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 25 January, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1120126/jsp/nation/story_15055211.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'apex-court-rap-for-order-evasion-12792', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 12792, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 12672 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Apex court rap for order evasion' $metaKeywords = 'Law and Justice' $metaDesc = ' -The Telegraph The Supreme Court today expressed anguish over the tendency to circumvent court orders instead of honouring them. The court said this while dealing with contempt petitions filed against some gutkha manufacturers for not abiding by its order to switch to...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">-The Telegraph</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court today expressed anguish over the tendency to circumvent court orders instead of honouring them.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court said this while dealing with contempt petitions filed against some gutkha manufacturers for not abiding by its order to switch to non-plastic sachets.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court had earlier issued contempt notices against Rajeev Kumar, the MD of the Dharampal Satyapal group, which manufactures two popular pan masala brands — Rajnigandha and Tulsi — for wilfully disobeying its orders.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The court had asked all gutkha and pan masala makers to switch to non-plastic pouches for health reasons and on environmental grounds in an order passed on December 7, 2010. The order was to come into effect from March 1, 2011.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">However, some gutkha makers, the Centre for Public Interest Litigation claimed, had violated this by not producing sachets of pan masala but instead repackaging it in small zip-pouches.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The order was restricted to sachets and not pouches, the lawyer for the manufacturer, Sudhir Chandra Aggarwal, said. “Even the Government of India understood it to be limited to sachets and not to pouches which are multi-purpose in use,” he claimed.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But the bench, comprising Justices Asok Kumar Ganguly and T.S. Thakur, rejected this explanation. “Do you mean to say that use of small sachets is not permissible but larger ones are?” Justice Thakur asked.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">CPIL lawyer Prashant Bhushan said the pan masala makers were “trying to be too clever by half”. If they were not clear on the order, they should have come to the top court for clarifications, he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Instead, they wrote to the environment and forest ministry seeking a clarification and then procured some legal opinion to show that the plastic packaging was technically not sachets but pouches and continued to manufacture them in plastic packaging. “This was mala fide,” he contended.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He sought action against the pan masala makers on this count. Contempt of court is punishable with a jail term of up to six months.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">After the counsel for Dharam Satyapal assured the court that they had since then switched over to non-plastic packaging, Justice Thakur said they should donate some money to some charity or cancer research by way of reparation.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">“You have earned so much money (in the two months you violated the court orders). You should donate some money to cancer research to close this (contempt) case,” Justice Thakur said.Eight per cent of oral cancer cases in India are attributed to long-term tobacco use. But Justice Ganguly did not agree to this. He expressed anguish over the tendency among most not to abide by orders of the court in “letter and spirit”. “What will happen to the institution then?” he wondered.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">He then directed that the case be listed again before Justice G.S. Singhvi and himself for further orders.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Apex court rap for order evasion |
-The Telegraph The Supreme Court today expressed anguish over the tendency to circumvent court orders instead of honouring them. The court said this while dealing with contempt petitions filed against some gutkha manufacturers for not abiding by its order to switch to non-plastic sachets. The court had earlier issued contempt notices against Rajeev Kumar, the MD of the Dharampal Satyapal group, which manufactures two popular pan masala brands — Rajnigandha and Tulsi — for wilfully disobeying its orders. The court had asked all gutkha and pan masala makers to switch to non-plastic pouches for health reasons and on environmental grounds in an order passed on December 7, 2010. The order was to come into effect from March 1, 2011. However, some gutkha makers, the Centre for Public Interest Litigation claimed, had violated this by not producing sachets of pan masala but instead repackaging it in small zip-pouches. The order was restricted to sachets and not pouches, the lawyer for the manufacturer, Sudhir Chandra Aggarwal, said. “Even the Government of India understood it to be limited to sachets and not to pouches which are multi-purpose in use,” he claimed. But the bench, comprising Justices Asok Kumar Ganguly and T.S. Thakur, rejected this explanation. “Do you mean to say that use of small sachets is not permissible but larger ones are?” Justice Thakur asked. CPIL lawyer Prashant Bhushan said the pan masala makers were “trying to be too clever by half”. If they were not clear on the order, they should have come to the top court for clarifications, he said. Instead, they wrote to the environment and forest ministry seeking a clarification and then procured some legal opinion to show that the plastic packaging was technically not sachets but pouches and continued to manufacture them in plastic packaging. “This was mala fide,” he contended. He sought action against the pan masala makers on this count. Contempt of court is punishable with a jail term of up to six months. After the counsel for Dharam Satyapal assured the court that they had since then switched over to non-plastic packaging, Justice Thakur said they should donate some money to some charity or cancer research by way of reparation. “You have earned so much money (in the two months you violated the court orders). You should donate some money to cancer research to close this (contempt) case,” Justice Thakur said.Eight per cent of oral cancer cases in India are attributed to long-term tobacco use. But Justice Ganguly did not agree to this. He expressed anguish over the tendency among most not to abide by orders of the court in “letter and spirit”. “What will happen to the institution then?” he wondered. He then directed that the case be listed again before Justice G.S. Singhvi and himself for further orders. |