Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/aravali-not-a-forest-says-haryana-order-dipak-k-dash-4675857/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/aravali-not-a-forest-says-haryana-order-dipak-k-dash-4675857/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/aravali-not-a-forest-says-haryana-order-dipak-k-dash-4675857/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/aravali-not-a-forest-says-haryana-order-dipak-k-dash-4675857/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68174d299996a-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68174d299996a-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68174d299996a-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68174d299996a-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68174d299996a-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68174d299996a-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68174d299996a-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68174d299996a-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68174d299996a-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 27806,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Aravali not a forest, says Haryana order -Dipak K Dash&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;In a fresh threat to the fragile ecosystem of the Aravalis, the Haryana forest department has reversed its earlier order and asked officials not to designate lands in the range as forests, other than those formally recorded as such.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The order implies that vast tracts of forests, including most parts of the sacred Mangarbani grove, would now be recorded as &#039;not forest&#039;. This reverses the department&#039;s March order in which it was decided to record the entire Aravali range as forest while carrying out ground surveys of natural conservation zones (NCZs) in NCR.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Terming the change as a &amp;quot;clarification&amp;quot;, a circular from the state forest secretary, issued on Monday, states, &amp;quot;...only recorded forests will be shown/marked as &#039;forests&#039; (Y) while carrying out ground truthing exercise... in Aravali region. Areas other than recorded forests will be shown/marked as &#039;not forest&#039; (N), which is the present status.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By contrast, the minutes of a meeting held on March 12 to decide the criteria for the survey had recorded: &amp;quot;The Aravali range in Haryana region as shown in NCZ will be kept in the category of &#039;forest to be identified as per criteria&#039; within the NCZ category temporarily till the criteria for forest are decided by the Supreme Court.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This would have meant that most parts of Aravali including Mangar and its sacred forest would have finally got recognition as forests. That, in turn, would have meant that the Forest Conservation Act would apply to these tracts, under which diversion of forest land for non-forest activities becomes tough and needs the Centre&#039;s approval.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TOI had on Monday first reported that informal instructions on the government&#039;s U-turn had been sent to officials.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While reversing the stand, Monday&#039;s order, however, plays safe. In the circular, the forest secretary has asked officials to carry a disclaimer in their ground survey reports that the status of areas marked as &amp;quot;no forest&amp;quot; may undergo further change when the criteria and parameters for classifying an area as a forest are finalized by the Union environment ministry and adopted by states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Referring to an affidavit filed by the state government in Supreme Court in 1997, the letter says the forest department had submitted details of reserved forests, protected forests, unclassified forests, forests notified under Indian Forest Act and areas notified under Sections 4 and 5 of Punjab Land Preservation Act.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Green activists have condemned the move. Said environmental analyst Chetan Agarwal, &amp;quot;The Supreme Court has said Aravali has to be protected at any cost and precautionary principle demands that the entire Aravali be treated as forest. Either they should have waited for the Supreme Court to finalize the criteria or the default position should been to record the entire range as forest.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Activist Col (retired) Sarvadaman Oberoi, who has dragged Haryana government to court on several issues, alleged that unseen forces seem to be behind the government&#039;s latest move. &amp;quot;There is something afoot,&amp;quot; he said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Officials are currently carrying out ground surveys of NCZs in each district of NCR to delineate forests, recharge zones, major water bodies and river beds. Forest cover constitutes just 3.5% of land in Haryana. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 16 April, 2015, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Aravali-not-a-forest-says-Haryana-order/articleshow/46938882.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;aravali-not-a-forest-says-haryana-order-dipak-k-dash-4675857&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4675857,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 27806,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Aravali not a forest, says Haryana order -Dipak K Dash&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;deforestation,Aravalis,Forests,Environment&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Times of India

NEW DELHI: In a fresh threat to the fragile ecosystem of the Aravalis, the Haryana forest department has reversed its earlier order and asked officials not to designate lands in the range as forests, other than those...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;In a fresh threat to the fragile ecosystem of the Aravalis, the Haryana forest department has reversed its earlier order and asked officials not to designate lands in the range as forests, other than those formally recorded as such.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The order implies that vast tracts of forests, including most parts of the sacred Mangarbani grove, would now be recorded as &#039;not forest&#039;. This reverses the department&#039;s March order in which it was decided to record the entire Aravali range as forest while carrying out ground surveys of natural conservation zones (NCZs) in NCR.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Terming the change as a &amp;quot;clarification&amp;quot;, a circular from the state forest secretary, issued on Monday, states, &amp;quot;...only recorded forests will be shown/marked as &#039;forests&#039; (Y) while carrying out ground truthing exercise... in Aravali region. Areas other than recorded forests will be shown/marked as &#039;not forest&#039; (N), which is the present status.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;By contrast, the minutes of a meeting held on March 12 to decide the criteria for the survey had recorded: &amp;quot;The Aravali range in Haryana region as shown in NCZ will be kept in the category of &#039;forest to be identified as per criteria&#039; within the NCZ category temporarily till the criteria for forest are decided by the Supreme Court.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This would have meant that most parts of Aravali including Mangar and its sacred forest would have finally got recognition as forests. That, in turn, would have meant that the Forest Conservation Act would apply to these tracts, under which diversion of forest land for non-forest activities becomes tough and needs the Centre&#039;s approval.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;TOI had on Monday first reported that informal instructions on the government&#039;s U-turn had been sent to officials.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While reversing the stand, Monday&#039;s order, however, plays safe. In the circular, the forest secretary has asked officials to carry a disclaimer in their ground survey reports that the status of areas marked as &amp;quot;no forest&amp;quot; may undergo further change when the criteria and parameters for classifying an area as a forest are finalized by the Union environment ministry and adopted by states.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Referring to an affidavit filed by the state government in Supreme Court in 1997, the letter says the forest department had submitted details of reserved forests, protected forests, unclassified forests, forests notified under Indian Forest Act and areas notified under Sections 4 and 5 of Punjab Land Preservation Act.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Green activists have condemned the move. Said environmental analyst Chetan Agarwal, &amp;quot;The Supreme Court has said Aravali has to be protected at any cost and precautionary principle demands that the entire Aravali be treated as forest. Either they should have waited for the Supreme Court to finalize the criteria or the default position should been to record the entire range as forest.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Activist Col (retired) Sarvadaman Oberoi, who has dragged Haryana government to court on several issues, alleged that unseen forces seem to be behind the government&#039;s latest move. &amp;quot;There is something afoot,&amp;quot; he said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Officials are currently carrying out ground surveys of NCZs in each district of NCR to delineate forests, recharge zones, major water bodies and river beds. Forest cover constitutes just 3.5% of land in Haryana. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 27806,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Aravali not a forest, says Haryana order -Dipak K Dash&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;In a fresh threat to the fragile ecosystem of the Aravalis, the Haryana forest department has reversed its earlier order and asked officials not to designate lands in the range as forests, other than those formally recorded as such.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The order implies that vast tracts of forests, including most parts of the sacred Mangarbani grove, would now be recorded as &#039;not forest&#039;. This reverses the department&#039;s March order in which it was decided to record the entire Aravali range as forest while carrying out ground surveys of natural conservation zones (NCZs) in NCR.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Terming the change as a &amp;quot;clarification&amp;quot;, a circular from the state forest secretary, issued on Monday, states, &amp;quot;...only recorded forests will be shown/marked as &#039;forests&#039; (Y) while carrying out ground truthing exercise... in Aravali region. Areas other than recorded forests will be shown/marked as &#039;not forest&#039; (N), which is the present status.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By contrast, the minutes of a meeting held on March 12 to decide the criteria for the survey had recorded: &amp;quot;The Aravali range in Haryana region as shown in NCZ will be kept in the category of &#039;forest to be identified as per criteria&#039; within the NCZ category temporarily till the criteria for forest are decided by the Supreme Court.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This would have meant that most parts of Aravali including Mangar and its sacred forest would have finally got recognition as forests. That, in turn, would have meant that the Forest Conservation Act would apply to these tracts, under which diversion of forest land for non-forest activities becomes tough and needs the Centre&#039;s approval.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TOI had on Monday first reported that informal instructions on the government&#039;s U-turn had been sent to officials.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While reversing the stand, Monday&#039;s order, however, plays safe. In the circular, the forest secretary has asked officials to carry a disclaimer in their ground survey reports that the status of areas marked as &amp;quot;no forest&amp;quot; may undergo further change when the criteria and parameters for classifying an area as a forest are finalized by the Union environment ministry and adopted by states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Referring to an affidavit filed by the state government in Supreme Court in 1997, the letter says the forest department had submitted details of reserved forests, protected forests, unclassified forests, forests notified under Indian Forest Act and areas notified under Sections 4 and 5 of Punjab Land Preservation Act.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Green activists have condemned the move. Said environmental analyst Chetan Agarwal, &amp;quot;The Supreme Court has said Aravali has to be protected at any cost and precautionary principle demands that the entire Aravali be treated as forest. Either they should have waited for the Supreme Court to finalize the criteria or the default position should been to record the entire range as forest.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Activist Col (retired) Sarvadaman Oberoi, who has dragged Haryana government to court on several issues, alleged that unseen forces seem to be behind the government&#039;s latest move. &amp;quot;There is something afoot,&amp;quot; he said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Officials are currently carrying out ground surveys of NCZs in each district of NCR to delineate forests, recharge zones, major water bodies and river beds. Forest cover constitutes just 3.5% of land in Haryana. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 16 April, 2015, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Aravali-not-a-forest-says-Haryana-order/articleshow/46938882.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;aravali-not-a-forest-says-haryana-order-dipak-k-dash-4675857&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4675857,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 27806
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Aravali not a forest, says Haryana order -Dipak K Dash&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;deforestation,Aravalis,Forests,Environment&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Times of India

NEW DELHI: In a fresh threat to the fragile ecosystem of the Aravalis, the Haryana forest department has reversed its earlier order and asked officials not to designate lands in the range as forests, other than those...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;In a fresh threat to the fragile ecosystem of the Aravalis, the Haryana forest department has reversed its earlier order and asked officials not to designate lands in the range as forests, other than those formally recorded as such.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The order implies that vast tracts of forests, including most parts of the sacred Mangarbani grove, would now be recorded as &#039;not forest&#039;. This reverses the department&#039;s March order in which it was decided to record the entire Aravali range as forest while carrying out ground surveys of natural conservation zones (NCZs) in NCR.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Terming the change as a &amp;quot;clarification&amp;quot;, a circular from the state forest secretary, issued on Monday, states, &amp;quot;...only recorded forests will be shown/marked as &#039;forests&#039; (Y) while carrying out ground truthing exercise... in Aravali region. Areas other than recorded forests will be shown/marked as &#039;not forest&#039; (N), which is the present status.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;By contrast, the minutes of a meeting held on March 12 to decide the criteria for the survey had recorded: &amp;quot;The Aravali range in Haryana region as shown in NCZ will be kept in the category of &#039;forest to be identified as per criteria&#039; within the NCZ category temporarily till the criteria for forest are decided by the Supreme Court.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This would have meant that most parts of Aravali including Mangar and its sacred forest would have finally got recognition as forests. That, in turn, would have meant that the Forest Conservation Act would apply to these tracts, under which diversion of forest land for non-forest activities becomes tough and needs the Centre&#039;s approval.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;TOI had on Monday first reported that informal instructions on the government&#039;s U-turn had been sent to officials.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While reversing the stand, Monday&#039;s order, however, plays safe. In the circular, the forest secretary has asked officials to carry a disclaimer in their ground survey reports that the status of areas marked as &amp;quot;no forest&amp;quot; may undergo further change when the criteria and parameters for classifying an area as a forest are finalized by the Union environment ministry and adopted by states.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Referring to an affidavit filed by the state government in Supreme Court in 1997, the letter says the forest department had submitted details of reserved forests, protected forests, unclassified forests, forests notified under Indian Forest Act and areas notified under Sections 4 and 5 of Punjab Land Preservation Act.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Green activists have condemned the move. Said environmental analyst Chetan Agarwal, &amp;quot;The Supreme Court has said Aravali has to be protected at any cost and precautionary principle demands that the entire Aravali be treated as forest. Either they should have waited for the Supreme Court to finalize the criteria or the default position should been to record the entire range as forest.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Activist Col (retired) Sarvadaman Oberoi, who has dragged Haryana government to court on several issues, alleged that unseen forces seem to be behind the government&#039;s latest move. &amp;quot;There is something afoot,&amp;quot; he said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Officials are currently carrying out ground surveys of NCZs in each district of NCR to delineate forests, recharge zones, major water bodies and river beds. Forest cover constitutes just 3.5% of land in Haryana. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/aravali-not-a-forest-says-haryana-order-dipak-k-dash-4675857.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Aravali not a forest, says Haryana order -Dipak K Dash | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Times of India

NEW DELHI: In a fresh threat to the fragile ecosystem of the Aravalis, the Haryana forest department has reversed its earlier order and asked officials not to designate lands in the range as forests, other than those..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Aravali not a forest, says Haryana order -Dipak K Dash</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Times of India<br /><em><br />NEW DELHI: </em>In a fresh threat to the fragile ecosystem of the Aravalis, the Haryana forest department has reversed its earlier order and asked officials not to designate lands in the range as forests, other than those formally recorded as such.<br /><br />The order implies that vast tracts of forests, including most parts of the sacred Mangarbani grove, would now be recorded as 'not forest'. This reverses the department's March order in which it was decided to record the entire Aravali range as forest while carrying out ground surveys of natural conservation zones (NCZs) in NCR.<br /><br />Terming the change as a &quot;clarification&quot;, a circular from the state forest secretary, issued on Monday, states, &quot;...only recorded forests will be shown/marked as 'forests' (Y) while carrying out ground truthing exercise... in Aravali region. Areas other than recorded forests will be shown/marked as 'not forest' (N), which is the present status.&quot;<br /><br />By contrast, the minutes of a meeting held on March 12 to decide the criteria for the survey had recorded: &quot;The Aravali range in Haryana region as shown in NCZ will be kept in the category of 'forest to be identified as per criteria' within the NCZ category temporarily till the criteria for forest are decided by the Supreme Court.&quot; <br /><br />This would have meant that most parts of Aravali including Mangar and its sacred forest would have finally got recognition as forests. That, in turn, would have meant that the Forest Conservation Act would apply to these tracts, under which diversion of forest land for non-forest activities becomes tough and needs the Centre's approval.<br /><br />TOI had on Monday first reported that informal instructions on the government's U-turn had been sent to officials.<br /><br />While reversing the stand, Monday's order, however, plays safe. In the circular, the forest secretary has asked officials to carry a disclaimer in their ground survey reports that the status of areas marked as &quot;no forest&quot; may undergo further change when the criteria and parameters for classifying an area as a forest are finalized by the Union environment ministry and adopted by states.<br /><br />Referring to an affidavit filed by the state government in Supreme Court in 1997, the letter says the forest department had submitted details of reserved forests, protected forests, unclassified forests, forests notified under Indian Forest Act and areas notified under Sections 4 and 5 of Punjab Land Preservation Act.<br /><br />Green activists have condemned the move. Said environmental analyst Chetan Agarwal, &quot;The Supreme Court has said Aravali has to be protected at any cost and precautionary principle demands that the entire Aravali be treated as forest. Either they should have waited for the Supreme Court to finalize the criteria or the default position should been to record the entire range as forest.&quot;<br /><br />Activist Col (retired) Sarvadaman Oberoi, who has dragged Haryana government to court on several issues, alleged that unseen forces seem to be behind the government's latest move. &quot;There is something afoot,&quot; he said.<br /><br />Officials are currently carrying out ground surveys of NCZs in each district of NCR to delineate forests, recharge zones, major water bodies and river beds. Forest cover constitutes just 3.5% of land in Haryana. <br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68174d299996a-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68174d299996a-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68174d299996a-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68174d299996a-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68174d299996a-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68174d299996a-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68174d299996a-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68174d299996a-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68174d299996a-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 27806,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Aravali not a forest, says Haryana order -Dipak K Dash&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;In a fresh threat to the fragile ecosystem of the Aravalis, the Haryana forest department has reversed its earlier order and asked officials not to designate lands in the range as forests, other than those formally recorded as such.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The order implies that vast tracts of forests, including most parts of the sacred Mangarbani grove, would now be recorded as &#039;not forest&#039;. This reverses the department&#039;s March order in which it was decided to record the entire Aravali range as forest while carrying out ground surveys of natural conservation zones (NCZs) in NCR.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Terming the change as a &amp;quot;clarification&amp;quot;, a circular from the state forest secretary, issued on Monday, states, &amp;quot;...only recorded forests will be shown/marked as &#039;forests&#039; (Y) while carrying out ground truthing exercise... in Aravali region. Areas other than recorded forests will be shown/marked as &#039;not forest&#039; (N), which is the present status.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By contrast, the minutes of a meeting held on March 12 to decide the criteria for the survey had recorded: &amp;quot;The Aravali range in Haryana region as shown in NCZ will be kept in the category of &#039;forest to be identified as per criteria&#039; within the NCZ category temporarily till the criteria for forest are decided by the Supreme Court.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This would have meant that most parts of Aravali including Mangar and its sacred forest would have finally got recognition as forests. That, in turn, would have meant that the Forest Conservation Act would apply to these tracts, under which diversion of forest land for non-forest activities becomes tough and needs the Centre&#039;s approval.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TOI had on Monday first reported that informal instructions on the government&#039;s U-turn had been sent to officials.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While reversing the stand, Monday&#039;s order, however, plays safe. In the circular, the forest secretary has asked officials to carry a disclaimer in their ground survey reports that the status of areas marked as &amp;quot;no forest&amp;quot; may undergo further change when the criteria and parameters for classifying an area as a forest are finalized by the Union environment ministry and adopted by states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Referring to an affidavit filed by the state government in Supreme Court in 1997, the letter says the forest department had submitted details of reserved forests, protected forests, unclassified forests, forests notified under Indian Forest Act and areas notified under Sections 4 and 5 of Punjab Land Preservation Act.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Green activists have condemned the move. Said environmental analyst Chetan Agarwal, &amp;quot;The Supreme Court has said Aravali has to be protected at any cost and precautionary principle demands that the entire Aravali be treated as forest. Either they should have waited for the Supreme Court to finalize the criteria or the default position should been to record the entire range as forest.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Activist Col (retired) Sarvadaman Oberoi, who has dragged Haryana government to court on several issues, alleged that unseen forces seem to be behind the government&#039;s latest move. &amp;quot;There is something afoot,&amp;quot; he said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Officials are currently carrying out ground surveys of NCZs in each district of NCR to delineate forests, recharge zones, major water bodies and river beds. Forest cover constitutes just 3.5% of land in Haryana. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 16 April, 2015, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Aravali-not-a-forest-says-Haryana-order/articleshow/46938882.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;aravali-not-a-forest-says-haryana-order-dipak-k-dash-4675857&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4675857,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 27806,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Aravali not a forest, says Haryana order -Dipak K Dash&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;deforestation,Aravalis,Forests,Environment&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Times of India

NEW DELHI: In a fresh threat to the fragile ecosystem of the Aravalis, the Haryana forest department has reversed its earlier order and asked officials not to designate lands in the range as forests, other than those...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;In a fresh threat to the fragile ecosystem of the Aravalis, the Haryana forest department has reversed its earlier order and asked officials not to designate lands in the range as forests, other than those formally recorded as such.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The order implies that vast tracts of forests, including most parts of the sacred Mangarbani grove, would now be recorded as &#039;not forest&#039;. This reverses the department&#039;s March order in which it was decided to record the entire Aravali range as forest while carrying out ground surveys of natural conservation zones (NCZs) in NCR.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Terming the change as a &amp;quot;clarification&amp;quot;, a circular from the state forest secretary, issued on Monday, states, &amp;quot;...only recorded forests will be shown/marked as &#039;forests&#039; (Y) while carrying out ground truthing exercise... in Aravali region. Areas other than recorded forests will be shown/marked as &#039;not forest&#039; (N), which is the present status.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;By contrast, the minutes of a meeting held on March 12 to decide the criteria for the survey had recorded: &amp;quot;The Aravali range in Haryana region as shown in NCZ will be kept in the category of &#039;forest to be identified as per criteria&#039; within the NCZ category temporarily till the criteria for forest are decided by the Supreme Court.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This would have meant that most parts of Aravali including Mangar and its sacred forest would have finally got recognition as forests. That, in turn, would have meant that the Forest Conservation Act would apply to these tracts, under which diversion of forest land for non-forest activities becomes tough and needs the Centre&#039;s approval.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;TOI had on Monday first reported that informal instructions on the government&#039;s U-turn had been sent to officials.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While reversing the stand, Monday&#039;s order, however, plays safe. In the circular, the forest secretary has asked officials to carry a disclaimer in their ground survey reports that the status of areas marked as &amp;quot;no forest&amp;quot; may undergo further change when the criteria and parameters for classifying an area as a forest are finalized by the Union environment ministry and adopted by states.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Referring to an affidavit filed by the state government in Supreme Court in 1997, the letter says the forest department had submitted details of reserved forests, protected forests, unclassified forests, forests notified under Indian Forest Act and areas notified under Sections 4 and 5 of Punjab Land Preservation Act.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Green activists have condemned the move. Said environmental analyst Chetan Agarwal, &amp;quot;The Supreme Court has said Aravali has to be protected at any cost and precautionary principle demands that the entire Aravali be treated as forest. Either they should have waited for the Supreme Court to finalize the criteria or the default position should been to record the entire range as forest.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Activist Col (retired) Sarvadaman Oberoi, who has dragged Haryana government to court on several issues, alleged that unseen forces seem to be behind the government&#039;s latest move. &amp;quot;There is something afoot,&amp;quot; he said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Officials are currently carrying out ground surveys of NCZs in each district of NCR to delineate forests, recharge zones, major water bodies and river beds. Forest cover constitutes just 3.5% of land in Haryana. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 27806,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Aravali not a forest, says Haryana order -Dipak K Dash&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;In a fresh threat to the fragile ecosystem of the Aravalis, the Haryana forest department has reversed its earlier order and asked officials not to designate lands in the range as forests, other than those formally recorded as such.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The order implies that vast tracts of forests, including most parts of the sacred Mangarbani grove, would now be recorded as &#039;not forest&#039;. This reverses the department&#039;s March order in which it was decided to record the entire Aravali range as forest while carrying out ground surveys of natural conservation zones (NCZs) in NCR.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Terming the change as a &amp;quot;clarification&amp;quot;, a circular from the state forest secretary, issued on Monday, states, &amp;quot;...only recorded forests will be shown/marked as &#039;forests&#039; (Y) while carrying out ground truthing exercise... in Aravali region. Areas other than recorded forests will be shown/marked as &#039;not forest&#039; (N), which is the present status.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By contrast, the minutes of a meeting held on March 12 to decide the criteria for the survey had recorded: &amp;quot;The Aravali range in Haryana region as shown in NCZ will be kept in the category of &#039;forest to be identified as per criteria&#039; within the NCZ category temporarily till the criteria for forest are decided by the Supreme Court.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This would have meant that most parts of Aravali including Mangar and its sacred forest would have finally got recognition as forests. That, in turn, would have meant that the Forest Conservation Act would apply to these tracts, under which diversion of forest land for non-forest activities becomes tough and needs the Centre&#039;s approval.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TOI had on Monday first reported that informal instructions on the government&#039;s U-turn had been sent to officials.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While reversing the stand, Monday&#039;s order, however, plays safe. In the circular, the forest secretary has asked officials to carry a disclaimer in their ground survey reports that the status of areas marked as &amp;quot;no forest&amp;quot; may undergo further change when the criteria and parameters for classifying an area as a forest are finalized by the Union environment ministry and adopted by states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Referring to an affidavit filed by the state government in Supreme Court in 1997, the letter says the forest department had submitted details of reserved forests, protected forests, unclassified forests, forests notified under Indian Forest Act and areas notified under Sections 4 and 5 of Punjab Land Preservation Act.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Green activists have condemned the move. Said environmental analyst Chetan Agarwal, &amp;quot;The Supreme Court has said Aravali has to be protected at any cost and precautionary principle demands that the entire Aravali be treated as forest. Either they should have waited for the Supreme Court to finalize the criteria or the default position should been to record the entire range as forest.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Activist Col (retired) Sarvadaman Oberoi, who has dragged Haryana government to court on several issues, alleged that unseen forces seem to be behind the government&#039;s latest move. &amp;quot;There is something afoot,&amp;quot; he said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Officials are currently carrying out ground surveys of NCZs in each district of NCR to delineate forests, recharge zones, major water bodies and river beds. Forest cover constitutes just 3.5% of land in Haryana. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 16 April, 2015, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Aravali-not-a-forest-says-Haryana-order/articleshow/46938882.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;aravali-not-a-forest-says-haryana-order-dipak-k-dash-4675857&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4675857,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 27806
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Aravali not a forest, says Haryana order -Dipak K Dash&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;deforestation,Aravalis,Forests,Environment&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Times of India

NEW DELHI: In a fresh threat to the fragile ecosystem of the Aravalis, the Haryana forest department has reversed its earlier order and asked officials not to designate lands in the range as forests, other than those...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;In a fresh threat to the fragile ecosystem of the Aravalis, the Haryana forest department has reversed its earlier order and asked officials not to designate lands in the range as forests, other than those formally recorded as such.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The order implies that vast tracts of forests, including most parts of the sacred Mangarbani grove, would now be recorded as &#039;not forest&#039;. This reverses the department&#039;s March order in which it was decided to record the entire Aravali range as forest while carrying out ground surveys of natural conservation zones (NCZs) in NCR.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Terming the change as a &amp;quot;clarification&amp;quot;, a circular from the state forest secretary, issued on Monday, states, &amp;quot;...only recorded forests will be shown/marked as &#039;forests&#039; (Y) while carrying out ground truthing exercise... in Aravali region. Areas other than recorded forests will be shown/marked as &#039;not forest&#039; (N), which is the present status.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;By contrast, the minutes of a meeting held on March 12 to decide the criteria for the survey had recorded: &amp;quot;The Aravali range in Haryana region as shown in NCZ will be kept in the category of &#039;forest to be identified as per criteria&#039; within the NCZ category temporarily till the criteria for forest are decided by the Supreme Court.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This would have meant that most parts of Aravali including Mangar and its sacred forest would have finally got recognition as forests. That, in turn, would have meant that the Forest Conservation Act would apply to these tracts, under which diversion of forest land for non-forest activities becomes tough and needs the Centre&#039;s approval.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;TOI had on Monday first reported that informal instructions on the government&#039;s U-turn had been sent to officials.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While reversing the stand, Monday&#039;s order, however, plays safe. In the circular, the forest secretary has asked officials to carry a disclaimer in their ground survey reports that the status of areas marked as &amp;quot;no forest&amp;quot; may undergo further change when the criteria and parameters for classifying an area as a forest are finalized by the Union environment ministry and adopted by states.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Referring to an affidavit filed by the state government in Supreme Court in 1997, the letter says the forest department had submitted details of reserved forests, protected forests, unclassified forests, forests notified under Indian Forest Act and areas notified under Sections 4 and 5 of Punjab Land Preservation Act.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Green activists have condemned the move. Said environmental analyst Chetan Agarwal, &amp;quot;The Supreme Court has said Aravali has to be protected at any cost and precautionary principle demands that the entire Aravali be treated as forest. Either they should have waited for the Supreme Court to finalize the criteria or the default position should been to record the entire range as forest.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Activist Col (retired) Sarvadaman Oberoi, who has dragged Haryana government to court on several issues, alleged that unseen forces seem to be behind the government&#039;s latest move. &amp;quot;There is something afoot,&amp;quot; he said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Officials are currently carrying out ground surveys of NCZs in each district of NCR to delineate forests, recharge zones, major water bodies and river beds. Forest cover constitutes just 3.5% of land in Haryana. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/aravali-not-a-forest-says-haryana-order-dipak-k-dash-4675857.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Aravali not a forest, says Haryana order -Dipak K Dash | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Times of India

NEW DELHI: In a fresh threat to the fragile ecosystem of the Aravalis, the Haryana forest department has reversed its earlier order and asked officials not to designate lands in the range as forests, other than those..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Aravali not a forest, says Haryana order -Dipak K Dash</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Times of India<br /><em><br />NEW DELHI: </em>In a fresh threat to the fragile ecosystem of the Aravalis, the Haryana forest department has reversed its earlier order and asked officials not to designate lands in the range as forests, other than those formally recorded as such.<br /><br />The order implies that vast tracts of forests, including most parts of the sacred Mangarbani grove, would now be recorded as 'not forest'. This reverses the department's March order in which it was decided to record the entire Aravali range as forest while carrying out ground surveys of natural conservation zones (NCZs) in NCR.<br /><br />Terming the change as a &quot;clarification&quot;, a circular from the state forest secretary, issued on Monday, states, &quot;...only recorded forests will be shown/marked as 'forests' (Y) while carrying out ground truthing exercise... in Aravali region. Areas other than recorded forests will be shown/marked as 'not forest' (N), which is the present status.&quot;<br /><br />By contrast, the minutes of a meeting held on March 12 to decide the criteria for the survey had recorded: &quot;The Aravali range in Haryana region as shown in NCZ will be kept in the category of 'forest to be identified as per criteria' within the NCZ category temporarily till the criteria for forest are decided by the Supreme Court.&quot; <br /><br />This would have meant that most parts of Aravali including Mangar and its sacred forest would have finally got recognition as forests. That, in turn, would have meant that the Forest Conservation Act would apply to these tracts, under which diversion of forest land for non-forest activities becomes tough and needs the Centre's approval.<br /><br />TOI had on Monday first reported that informal instructions on the government's U-turn had been sent to officials.<br /><br />While reversing the stand, Monday's order, however, plays safe. In the circular, the forest secretary has asked officials to carry a disclaimer in their ground survey reports that the status of areas marked as &quot;no forest&quot; may undergo further change when the criteria and parameters for classifying an area as a forest are finalized by the Union environment ministry and adopted by states.<br /><br />Referring to an affidavit filed by the state government in Supreme Court in 1997, the letter says the forest department had submitted details of reserved forests, protected forests, unclassified forests, forests notified under Indian Forest Act and areas notified under Sections 4 and 5 of Punjab Land Preservation Act.<br /><br />Green activists have condemned the move. Said environmental analyst Chetan Agarwal, &quot;The Supreme Court has said Aravali has to be protected at any cost and precautionary principle demands that the entire Aravali be treated as forest. Either they should have waited for the Supreme Court to finalize the criteria or the default position should been to record the entire range as forest.&quot;<br /><br />Activist Col (retired) Sarvadaman Oberoi, who has dragged Haryana government to court on several issues, alleged that unseen forces seem to be behind the government's latest move. &quot;There is something afoot,&quot; he said.<br /><br />Officials are currently carrying out ground surveys of NCZs in each district of NCR to delineate forests, recharge zones, major water bodies and river beds. Forest cover constitutes just 3.5% of land in Haryana. <br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68174d299996a-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68174d299996a-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68174d299996a-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68174d299996a-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68174d299996a-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68174d299996a-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68174d299996a-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68174d299996a-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68174d299996a-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 27806,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Aravali not a forest, says Haryana order -Dipak K Dash&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;In a fresh threat to the fragile ecosystem of the Aravalis, the Haryana forest department has reversed its earlier order and asked officials not to designate lands in the range as forests, other than those formally recorded as such.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The order implies that vast tracts of forests, including most parts of the sacred Mangarbani grove, would now be recorded as &#039;not forest&#039;. This reverses the department&#039;s March order in which it was decided to record the entire Aravali range as forest while carrying out ground surveys of natural conservation zones (NCZs) in NCR.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Terming the change as a &amp;quot;clarification&amp;quot;, a circular from the state forest secretary, issued on Monday, states, &amp;quot;...only recorded forests will be shown/marked as &#039;forests&#039; (Y) while carrying out ground truthing exercise... in Aravali region. Areas other than recorded forests will be shown/marked as &#039;not forest&#039; (N), which is the present status.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By contrast, the minutes of a meeting held on March 12 to decide the criteria for the survey had recorded: &amp;quot;The Aravali range in Haryana region as shown in NCZ will be kept in the category of &#039;forest to be identified as per criteria&#039; within the NCZ category temporarily till the criteria for forest are decided by the Supreme Court.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This would have meant that most parts of Aravali including Mangar and its sacred forest would have finally got recognition as forests. That, in turn, would have meant that the Forest Conservation Act would apply to these tracts, under which diversion of forest land for non-forest activities becomes tough and needs the Centre&#039;s approval.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TOI had on Monday first reported that informal instructions on the government&#039;s U-turn had been sent to officials.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While reversing the stand, Monday&#039;s order, however, plays safe. In the circular, the forest secretary has asked officials to carry a disclaimer in their ground survey reports that the status of areas marked as &amp;quot;no forest&amp;quot; may undergo further change when the criteria and parameters for classifying an area as a forest are finalized by the Union environment ministry and adopted by states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Referring to an affidavit filed by the state government in Supreme Court in 1997, the letter says the forest department had submitted details of reserved forests, protected forests, unclassified forests, forests notified under Indian Forest Act and areas notified under Sections 4 and 5 of Punjab Land Preservation Act.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Green activists have condemned the move. Said environmental analyst Chetan Agarwal, &amp;quot;The Supreme Court has said Aravali has to be protected at any cost and precautionary principle demands that the entire Aravali be treated as forest. Either they should have waited for the Supreme Court to finalize the criteria or the default position should been to record the entire range as forest.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Activist Col (retired) Sarvadaman Oberoi, who has dragged Haryana government to court on several issues, alleged that unseen forces seem to be behind the government&#039;s latest move. &amp;quot;There is something afoot,&amp;quot; he said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Officials are currently carrying out ground surveys of NCZs in each district of NCR to delineate forests, recharge zones, major water bodies and river beds. Forest cover constitutes just 3.5% of land in Haryana. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 16 April, 2015, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Aravali-not-a-forest-says-Haryana-order/articleshow/46938882.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;aravali-not-a-forest-says-haryana-order-dipak-k-dash-4675857&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4675857,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 27806,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Aravali not a forest, says Haryana order -Dipak K Dash&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;deforestation,Aravalis,Forests,Environment&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Times of India

NEW DELHI: In a fresh threat to the fragile ecosystem of the Aravalis, the Haryana forest department has reversed its earlier order and asked officials not to designate lands in the range as forests, other than those...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;In a fresh threat to the fragile ecosystem of the Aravalis, the Haryana forest department has reversed its earlier order and asked officials not to designate lands in the range as forests, other than those formally recorded as such.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The order implies that vast tracts of forests, including most parts of the sacred Mangarbani grove, would now be recorded as &#039;not forest&#039;. This reverses the department&#039;s March order in which it was decided to record the entire Aravali range as forest while carrying out ground surveys of natural conservation zones (NCZs) in NCR.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Terming the change as a &amp;quot;clarification&amp;quot;, a circular from the state forest secretary, issued on Monday, states, &amp;quot;...only recorded forests will be shown/marked as &#039;forests&#039; (Y) while carrying out ground truthing exercise... in Aravali region. Areas other than recorded forests will be shown/marked as &#039;not forest&#039; (N), which is the present status.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;By contrast, the minutes of a meeting held on March 12 to decide the criteria for the survey had recorded: &amp;quot;The Aravali range in Haryana region as shown in NCZ will be kept in the category of &#039;forest to be identified as per criteria&#039; within the NCZ category temporarily till the criteria for forest are decided by the Supreme Court.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This would have meant that most parts of Aravali including Mangar and its sacred forest would have finally got recognition as forests. That, in turn, would have meant that the Forest Conservation Act would apply to these tracts, under which diversion of forest land for non-forest activities becomes tough and needs the Centre&#039;s approval.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;TOI had on Monday first reported that informal instructions on the government&#039;s U-turn had been sent to officials.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While reversing the stand, Monday&#039;s order, however, plays safe. In the circular, the forest secretary has asked officials to carry a disclaimer in their ground survey reports that the status of areas marked as &amp;quot;no forest&amp;quot; may undergo further change when the criteria and parameters for classifying an area as a forest are finalized by the Union environment ministry and adopted by states.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Referring to an affidavit filed by the state government in Supreme Court in 1997, the letter says the forest department had submitted details of reserved forests, protected forests, unclassified forests, forests notified under Indian Forest Act and areas notified under Sections 4 and 5 of Punjab Land Preservation Act.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Green activists have condemned the move. Said environmental analyst Chetan Agarwal, &amp;quot;The Supreme Court has said Aravali has to be protected at any cost and precautionary principle demands that the entire Aravali be treated as forest. Either they should have waited for the Supreme Court to finalize the criteria or the default position should been to record the entire range as forest.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Activist Col (retired) Sarvadaman Oberoi, who has dragged Haryana government to court on several issues, alleged that unseen forces seem to be behind the government&#039;s latest move. &amp;quot;There is something afoot,&amp;quot; he said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Officials are currently carrying out ground surveys of NCZs in each district of NCR to delineate forests, recharge zones, major water bodies and river beds. Forest cover constitutes just 3.5% of land in Haryana. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 27806,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Aravali not a forest, says Haryana order -Dipak K Dash&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;In a fresh threat to the fragile ecosystem of the Aravalis, the Haryana forest department has reversed its earlier order and asked officials not to designate lands in the range as forests, other than those formally recorded as such.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The order implies that vast tracts of forests, including most parts of the sacred Mangarbani grove, would now be recorded as &#039;not forest&#039;. This reverses the department&#039;s March order in which it was decided to record the entire Aravali range as forest while carrying out ground surveys of natural conservation zones (NCZs) in NCR.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Terming the change as a &amp;quot;clarification&amp;quot;, a circular from the state forest secretary, issued on Monday, states, &amp;quot;...only recorded forests will be shown/marked as &#039;forests&#039; (Y) while carrying out ground truthing exercise... in Aravali region. Areas other than recorded forests will be shown/marked as &#039;not forest&#039; (N), which is the present status.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By contrast, the minutes of a meeting held on March 12 to decide the criteria for the survey had recorded: &amp;quot;The Aravali range in Haryana region as shown in NCZ will be kept in the category of &#039;forest to be identified as per criteria&#039; within the NCZ category temporarily till the criteria for forest are decided by the Supreme Court.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This would have meant that most parts of Aravali including Mangar and its sacred forest would have finally got recognition as forests. That, in turn, would have meant that the Forest Conservation Act would apply to these tracts, under which diversion of forest land for non-forest activities becomes tough and needs the Centre&#039;s approval.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TOI had on Monday first reported that informal instructions on the government&#039;s U-turn had been sent to officials.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While reversing the stand, Monday&#039;s order, however, plays safe. In the circular, the forest secretary has asked officials to carry a disclaimer in their ground survey reports that the status of areas marked as &amp;quot;no forest&amp;quot; may undergo further change when the criteria and parameters for classifying an area as a forest are finalized by the Union environment ministry and adopted by states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Referring to an affidavit filed by the state government in Supreme Court in 1997, the letter says the forest department had submitted details of reserved forests, protected forests, unclassified forests, forests notified under Indian Forest Act and areas notified under Sections 4 and 5 of Punjab Land Preservation Act.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Green activists have condemned the move. Said environmental analyst Chetan Agarwal, &amp;quot;The Supreme Court has said Aravali has to be protected at any cost and precautionary principle demands that the entire Aravali be treated as forest. Either they should have waited for the Supreme Court to finalize the criteria or the default position should been to record the entire range as forest.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Activist Col (retired) Sarvadaman Oberoi, who has dragged Haryana government to court on several issues, alleged that unseen forces seem to be behind the government&#039;s latest move. &amp;quot;There is something afoot,&amp;quot; he said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Officials are currently carrying out ground surveys of NCZs in each district of NCR to delineate forests, recharge zones, major water bodies and river beds. Forest cover constitutes just 3.5% of land in Haryana. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 16 April, 2015, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Aravali-not-a-forest-says-Haryana-order/articleshow/46938882.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;aravali-not-a-forest-says-haryana-order-dipak-k-dash-4675857&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4675857,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 27806
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Aravali not a forest, says Haryana order -Dipak K Dash&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;deforestation,Aravalis,Forests,Environment&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Times of India

NEW DELHI: In a fresh threat to the fragile ecosystem of the Aravalis, the Haryana forest department has reversed its earlier order and asked officials not to designate lands in the range as forests, other than those...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;In a fresh threat to the fragile ecosystem of the Aravalis, the Haryana forest department has reversed its earlier order and asked officials not to designate lands in the range as forests, other than those formally recorded as such.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The order implies that vast tracts of forests, including most parts of the sacred Mangarbani grove, would now be recorded as &#039;not forest&#039;. This reverses the department&#039;s March order in which it was decided to record the entire Aravali range as forest while carrying out ground surveys of natural conservation zones (NCZs) in NCR.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Terming the change as a &amp;quot;clarification&amp;quot;, a circular from the state forest secretary, issued on Monday, states, &amp;quot;...only recorded forests will be shown/marked as &#039;forests&#039; (Y) while carrying out ground truthing exercise... in Aravali region. Areas other than recorded forests will be shown/marked as &#039;not forest&#039; (N), which is the present status.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;By contrast, the minutes of a meeting held on March 12 to decide the criteria for the survey had recorded: &amp;quot;The Aravali range in Haryana region as shown in NCZ will be kept in the category of &#039;forest to be identified as per criteria&#039; within the NCZ category temporarily till the criteria for forest are decided by the Supreme Court.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This would have meant that most parts of Aravali including Mangar and its sacred forest would have finally got recognition as forests. That, in turn, would have meant that the Forest Conservation Act would apply to these tracts, under which diversion of forest land for non-forest activities becomes tough and needs the Centre&#039;s approval.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;TOI had on Monday first reported that informal instructions on the government&#039;s U-turn had been sent to officials.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While reversing the stand, Monday&#039;s order, however, plays safe. In the circular, the forest secretary has asked officials to carry a disclaimer in their ground survey reports that the status of areas marked as &amp;quot;no forest&amp;quot; may undergo further change when the criteria and parameters for classifying an area as a forest are finalized by the Union environment ministry and adopted by states.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Referring to an affidavit filed by the state government in Supreme Court in 1997, the letter says the forest department had submitted details of reserved forests, protected forests, unclassified forests, forests notified under Indian Forest Act and areas notified under Sections 4 and 5 of Punjab Land Preservation Act.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Green activists have condemned the move. Said environmental analyst Chetan Agarwal, &amp;quot;The Supreme Court has said Aravali has to be protected at any cost and precautionary principle demands that the entire Aravali be treated as forest. Either they should have waited for the Supreme Court to finalize the criteria or the default position should been to record the entire range as forest.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Activist Col (retired) Sarvadaman Oberoi, who has dragged Haryana government to court on several issues, alleged that unseen forces seem to be behind the government&#039;s latest move. &amp;quot;There is something afoot,&amp;quot; he said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Officials are currently carrying out ground surveys of NCZs in each district of NCR to delineate forests, recharge zones, major water bodies and river beds. Forest cover constitutes just 3.5% of land in Haryana. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/aravali-not-a-forest-says-haryana-order-dipak-k-dash-4675857.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Aravali not a forest, says Haryana order -Dipak K Dash | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Times of India

NEW DELHI: In a fresh threat to the fragile ecosystem of the Aravalis, the Haryana forest department has reversed its earlier order and asked officials not to designate lands in the range as forests, other than those..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Aravali not a forest, says Haryana order -Dipak K Dash</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Times of India<br /><em><br />NEW DELHI: </em>In a fresh threat to the fragile ecosystem of the Aravalis, the Haryana forest department has reversed its earlier order and asked officials not to designate lands in the range as forests, other than those formally recorded as such.<br /><br />The order implies that vast tracts of forests, including most parts of the sacred Mangarbani grove, would now be recorded as 'not forest'. This reverses the department's March order in which it was decided to record the entire Aravali range as forest while carrying out ground surveys of natural conservation zones (NCZs) in NCR.<br /><br />Terming the change as a &quot;clarification&quot;, a circular from the state forest secretary, issued on Monday, states, &quot;...only recorded forests will be shown/marked as 'forests' (Y) while carrying out ground truthing exercise... in Aravali region. Areas other than recorded forests will be shown/marked as 'not forest' (N), which is the present status.&quot;<br /><br />By contrast, the minutes of a meeting held on March 12 to decide the criteria for the survey had recorded: &quot;The Aravali range in Haryana region as shown in NCZ will be kept in the category of 'forest to be identified as per criteria' within the NCZ category temporarily till the criteria for forest are decided by the Supreme Court.&quot; <br /><br />This would have meant that most parts of Aravali including Mangar and its sacred forest would have finally got recognition as forests. That, in turn, would have meant that the Forest Conservation Act would apply to these tracts, under which diversion of forest land for non-forest activities becomes tough and needs the Centre's approval.<br /><br />TOI had on Monday first reported that informal instructions on the government's U-turn had been sent to officials.<br /><br />While reversing the stand, Monday's order, however, plays safe. In the circular, the forest secretary has asked officials to carry a disclaimer in their ground survey reports that the status of areas marked as &quot;no forest&quot; may undergo further change when the criteria and parameters for classifying an area as a forest are finalized by the Union environment ministry and adopted by states.<br /><br />Referring to an affidavit filed by the state government in Supreme Court in 1997, the letter says the forest department had submitted details of reserved forests, protected forests, unclassified forests, forests notified under Indian Forest Act and areas notified under Sections 4 and 5 of Punjab Land Preservation Act.<br /><br />Green activists have condemned the move. Said environmental analyst Chetan Agarwal, &quot;The Supreme Court has said Aravali has to be protected at any cost and precautionary principle demands that the entire Aravali be treated as forest. Either they should have waited for the Supreme Court to finalize the criteria or the default position should been to record the entire range as forest.&quot;<br /><br />Activist Col (retired) Sarvadaman Oberoi, who has dragged Haryana government to court on several issues, alleged that unseen forces seem to be behind the government's latest move. &quot;There is something afoot,&quot; he said.<br /><br />Officials are currently carrying out ground surveys of NCZs in each district of NCR to delineate forests, recharge zones, major water bodies and river beds. Forest cover constitutes just 3.5% of land in Haryana. <br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 27806,
		'title' => 'Aravali not a forest, says Haryana order -Dipak K Dash',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Times of India<br />
<em><br />
NEW DELHI: </em>In a fresh threat to the fragile ecosystem of the Aravalis, the Haryana forest department has reversed its earlier order and asked officials not to designate lands in the range as forests, other than those formally recorded as such.<br />
<br />
The order implies that vast tracts of forests, including most parts of the sacred Mangarbani grove, would now be recorded as 'not forest'. This reverses the department's March order in which it was decided to record the entire Aravali range as forest while carrying out ground surveys of natural conservation zones (NCZs) in NCR.<br />
<br />
Terming the change as a &quot;clarification&quot;, a circular from the state forest secretary, issued on Monday, states, &quot;...only recorded forests will be shown/marked as 'forests' (Y) while carrying out ground truthing exercise... in Aravali region. Areas other than recorded forests will be shown/marked as 'not forest' (N), which is the present status.&quot;<br />
<br />
By contrast, the minutes of a meeting held on March 12 to decide the criteria for the survey had recorded: &quot;The Aravali range in Haryana region as shown in NCZ will be kept in the category of 'forest to be identified as per criteria' within the NCZ category temporarily till the criteria for forest are decided by the Supreme Court.&quot; <br />
<br />
This would have meant that most parts of Aravali including Mangar and its sacred forest would have finally got recognition as forests. That, in turn, would have meant that the Forest Conservation Act would apply to these tracts, under which diversion of forest land for non-forest activities becomes tough and needs the Centre's approval.<br />
<br />
TOI had on Monday first reported that informal instructions on the government's U-turn had been sent to officials.<br />
<br />
While reversing the stand, Monday's order, however, plays safe. In the circular, the forest secretary has asked officials to carry a disclaimer in their ground survey reports that the status of areas marked as &quot;no forest&quot; may undergo further change when the criteria and parameters for classifying an area as a forest are finalized by the Union environment ministry and adopted by states.<br />
<br />
Referring to an affidavit filed by the state government in Supreme Court in 1997, the letter says the forest department had submitted details of reserved forests, protected forests, unclassified forests, forests notified under Indian Forest Act and areas notified under Sections 4 and 5 of Punjab Land Preservation Act.<br />
<br />
Green activists have condemned the move. Said environmental analyst Chetan Agarwal, &quot;The Supreme Court has said Aravali has to be protected at any cost and precautionary principle demands that the entire Aravali be treated as forest. Either they should have waited for the Supreme Court to finalize the criteria or the default position should been to record the entire range as forest.&quot;<br />
<br />
Activist Col (retired) Sarvadaman Oberoi, who has dragged Haryana government to court on several issues, alleged that unseen forces seem to be behind the government's latest move. &quot;There is something afoot,&quot; he said.<br />
<br />
Officials are currently carrying out ground surveys of NCZs in each district of NCR to delineate forests, recharge zones, major water bodies and river beds. Forest cover constitutes just 3.5% of land in Haryana. <br />
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 16 April, 2015, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Aravali-not-a-forest-says-Haryana-order/articleshow/46938882.cms',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'aravali-not-a-forest-says-haryana-order-dipak-k-dash-4675857',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 4675857,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 27806,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Aravali not a forest, says Haryana order -Dipak K Dash',
	'metaKeywords' => 'deforestation,Aravalis,Forests,Environment',
	'metaDesc' => '
-The Times of India

NEW DELHI: In a fresh threat to the fragile ecosystem of the Aravalis, the Haryana forest department has reversed its earlier order and asked officials not to designate lands in the range as forests, other than those...',
	'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Times of India<br /><em><br />NEW DELHI: </em>In a fresh threat to the fragile ecosystem of the Aravalis, the Haryana forest department has reversed its earlier order and asked officials not to designate lands in the range as forests, other than those formally recorded as such.<br /><br />The order implies that vast tracts of forests, including most parts of the sacred Mangarbani grove, would now be recorded as 'not forest'. This reverses the department's March order in which it was decided to record the entire Aravali range as forest while carrying out ground surveys of natural conservation zones (NCZs) in NCR.<br /><br />Terming the change as a &quot;clarification&quot;, a circular from the state forest secretary, issued on Monday, states, &quot;...only recorded forests will be shown/marked as 'forests' (Y) while carrying out ground truthing exercise... in Aravali region. Areas other than recorded forests will be shown/marked as 'not forest' (N), which is the present status.&quot;<br /><br />By contrast, the minutes of a meeting held on March 12 to decide the criteria for the survey had recorded: &quot;The Aravali range in Haryana region as shown in NCZ will be kept in the category of 'forest to be identified as per criteria' within the NCZ category temporarily till the criteria for forest are decided by the Supreme Court.&quot; <br /><br />This would have meant that most parts of Aravali including Mangar and its sacred forest would have finally got recognition as forests. That, in turn, would have meant that the Forest Conservation Act would apply to these tracts, under which diversion of forest land for non-forest activities becomes tough and needs the Centre's approval.<br /><br />TOI had on Monday first reported that informal instructions on the government's U-turn had been sent to officials.<br /><br />While reversing the stand, Monday's order, however, plays safe. In the circular, the forest secretary has asked officials to carry a disclaimer in their ground survey reports that the status of areas marked as &quot;no forest&quot; may undergo further change when the criteria and parameters for classifying an area as a forest are finalized by the Union environment ministry and adopted by states.<br /><br />Referring to an affidavit filed by the state government in Supreme Court in 1997, the letter says the forest department had submitted details of reserved forests, protected forests, unclassified forests, forests notified under Indian Forest Act and areas notified under Sections 4 and 5 of Punjab Land Preservation Act.<br /><br />Green activists have condemned the move. Said environmental analyst Chetan Agarwal, &quot;The Supreme Court has said Aravali has to be protected at any cost and precautionary principle demands that the entire Aravali be treated as forest. Either they should have waited for the Supreme Court to finalize the criteria or the default position should been to record the entire range as forest.&quot;<br /><br />Activist Col (retired) Sarvadaman Oberoi, who has dragged Haryana government to court on several issues, alleged that unseen forces seem to be behind the government's latest move. &quot;There is something afoot,&quot; he said.<br /><br />Officials are currently carrying out ground surveys of NCZs in each district of NCR to delineate forests, recharge zones, major water bodies and river beds. Forest cover constitutes just 3.5% of land in Haryana. <br /></div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 27806,
	'title' => 'Aravali not a forest, says Haryana order -Dipak K Dash',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Times of India<br />
<em><br />
NEW DELHI: </em>In a fresh threat to the fragile ecosystem of the Aravalis, the Haryana forest department has reversed its earlier order and asked officials not to designate lands in the range as forests, other than those formally recorded as such.<br />
<br />
The order implies that vast tracts of forests, including most parts of the sacred Mangarbani grove, would now be recorded as 'not forest'. This reverses the department's March order in which it was decided to record the entire Aravali range as forest while carrying out ground surveys of natural conservation zones (NCZs) in NCR.<br />
<br />
Terming the change as a &quot;clarification&quot;, a circular from the state forest secretary, issued on Monday, states, &quot;...only recorded forests will be shown/marked as 'forests' (Y) while carrying out ground truthing exercise... in Aravali region. Areas other than recorded forests will be shown/marked as 'not forest' (N), which is the present status.&quot;<br />
<br />
By contrast, the minutes of a meeting held on March 12 to decide the criteria for the survey had recorded: &quot;The Aravali range in Haryana region as shown in NCZ will be kept in the category of 'forest to be identified as per criteria' within the NCZ category temporarily till the criteria for forest are decided by the Supreme Court.&quot; <br />
<br />
This would have meant that most parts of Aravali including Mangar and its sacred forest would have finally got recognition as forests. That, in turn, would have meant that the Forest Conservation Act would apply to these tracts, under which diversion of forest land for non-forest activities becomes tough and needs the Centre's approval.<br />
<br />
TOI had on Monday first reported that informal instructions on the government's U-turn had been sent to officials.<br />
<br />
While reversing the stand, Monday's order, however, plays safe. In the circular, the forest secretary has asked officials to carry a disclaimer in their ground survey reports that the status of areas marked as &quot;no forest&quot; may undergo further change when the criteria and parameters for classifying an area as a forest are finalized by the Union environment ministry and adopted by states.<br />
<br />
Referring to an affidavit filed by the state government in Supreme Court in 1997, the letter says the forest department had submitted details of reserved forests, protected forests, unclassified forests, forests notified under Indian Forest Act and areas notified under Sections 4 and 5 of Punjab Land Preservation Act.<br />
<br />
Green activists have condemned the move. Said environmental analyst Chetan Agarwal, &quot;The Supreme Court has said Aravali has to be protected at any cost and precautionary principle demands that the entire Aravali be treated as forest. Either they should have waited for the Supreme Court to finalize the criteria or the default position should been to record the entire range as forest.&quot;<br />
<br />
Activist Col (retired) Sarvadaman Oberoi, who has dragged Haryana government to court on several issues, alleged that unseen forces seem to be behind the government's latest move. &quot;There is something afoot,&quot; he said.<br />
<br />
Officials are currently carrying out ground surveys of NCZs in each district of NCR to delineate forests, recharge zones, major water bodies and river beds. Forest cover constitutes just 3.5% of land in Haryana. <br />
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 16 April, 2015, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Aravali-not-a-forest-says-Haryana-order/articleshow/46938882.cms',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'aravali-not-a-forest-says-haryana-order-dipak-k-dash-4675857',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 4675857,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 27806
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Aravali not a forest, says Haryana order -Dipak K Dash'
$metaKeywords = 'deforestation,Aravalis,Forests,Environment'
$metaDesc = '
-The Times of India

NEW DELHI: In a fresh threat to the fragile ecosystem of the Aravalis, the Haryana forest department has reversed its earlier order and asked officials not to designate lands in the range as forests, other than those...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-The Times of India<br /><em><br />NEW DELHI: </em>In a fresh threat to the fragile ecosystem of the Aravalis, the Haryana forest department has reversed its earlier order and asked officials not to designate lands in the range as forests, other than those formally recorded as such.<br /><br />The order implies that vast tracts of forests, including most parts of the sacred Mangarbani grove, would now be recorded as 'not forest'. This reverses the department's March order in which it was decided to record the entire Aravali range as forest while carrying out ground surveys of natural conservation zones (NCZs) in NCR.<br /><br />Terming the change as a &quot;clarification&quot;, a circular from the state forest secretary, issued on Monday, states, &quot;...only recorded forests will be shown/marked as 'forests' (Y) while carrying out ground truthing exercise... in Aravali region. Areas other than recorded forests will be shown/marked as 'not forest' (N), which is the present status.&quot;<br /><br />By contrast, the minutes of a meeting held on March 12 to decide the criteria for the survey had recorded: &quot;The Aravali range in Haryana region as shown in NCZ will be kept in the category of 'forest to be identified as per criteria' within the NCZ category temporarily till the criteria for forest are decided by the Supreme Court.&quot; <br /><br />This would have meant that most parts of Aravali including Mangar and its sacred forest would have finally got recognition as forests. That, in turn, would have meant that the Forest Conservation Act would apply to these tracts, under which diversion of forest land for non-forest activities becomes tough and needs the Centre's approval.<br /><br />TOI had on Monday first reported that informal instructions on the government's U-turn had been sent to officials.<br /><br />While reversing the stand, Monday's order, however, plays safe. In the circular, the forest secretary has asked officials to carry a disclaimer in their ground survey reports that the status of areas marked as &quot;no forest&quot; may undergo further change when the criteria and parameters for classifying an area as a forest are finalized by the Union environment ministry and adopted by states.<br /><br />Referring to an affidavit filed by the state government in Supreme Court in 1997, the letter says the forest department had submitted details of reserved forests, protected forests, unclassified forests, forests notified under Indian Forest Act and areas notified under Sections 4 and 5 of Punjab Land Preservation Act.<br /><br />Green activists have condemned the move. Said environmental analyst Chetan Agarwal, &quot;The Supreme Court has said Aravali has to be protected at any cost and precautionary principle demands that the entire Aravali be treated as forest. Either they should have waited for the Supreme Court to finalize the criteria or the default position should been to record the entire range as forest.&quot;<br /><br />Activist Col (retired) Sarvadaman Oberoi, who has dragged Haryana government to court on several issues, alleged that unseen forces seem to be behind the government's latest move. &quot;There is something afoot,&quot; he said.<br /><br />Officials are currently carrying out ground surveys of NCZs in each district of NCR to delineate forests, recharge zones, major water bodies and river beds. Forest cover constitutes just 3.5% of land in Haryana. <br /></div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

Aravali not a forest, says Haryana order -Dipak K Dash

-The Times of India NEW DELHI: In a fresh threat to the fragile ecosystem of the Aravalis, the Haryana forest department has reversed its earlier order and asked officials not to designate lands in the range as forests, other than those formally recorded as such. The order implies that vast tracts of forests, including most parts of the sacred Mangarbani grove, would now be recorded as 'not forest'. This reverses the department's March order in which it was decided to record the entire Aravali range as forest while carrying out ground surveys of natural conservation zones (NCZs) in NCR. Terming the change as a "clarification", a circular from the state forest secretary, issued on Monday, states, "...only recorded forests will be shown/marked as 'forests' (Y) while carrying out ground truthing exercise... in Aravali region. Areas other than recorded forests will be shown/marked as 'not forest' (N), which is the present status." By contrast, the minutes of a meeting held on March 12 to decide the criteria for the survey had recorded: "The Aravali range in Haryana region as shown in NCZ will be kept in the category of 'forest to be identified as per criteria' within the NCZ category temporarily till the criteria for forest are decided by the Supreme Court." This would have meant that most parts of Aravali including Mangar and its sacred forest would have finally got recognition as forests. That, in turn, would have meant that the Forest Conservation Act would apply to these tracts, under which diversion of forest land for non-forest activities becomes tough and needs the Centre's approval. TOI had on Monday first reported that informal instructions on the government's U-turn had been sent to officials. While reversing the stand, Monday's order, however, plays safe. In the circular, the forest secretary has asked officials to carry a disclaimer in their ground survey reports that the status of areas marked as "no forest" may undergo further change when the criteria and parameters for classifying an area as a forest are finalized by the Union environment ministry and adopted by states. Referring to an affidavit filed by the state government in Supreme Court in 1997, the letter says the forest department had submitted details of reserved forests, protected forests, unclassified forests, forests notified under Indian Forest Act and areas notified under Sections 4 and 5 of Punjab Land Preservation Act. Green activists have condemned the move. Said environmental analyst Chetan Agarwal, "The Supreme Court has said Aravali has to be protected at any cost and precautionary principle demands that the entire Aravali be treated as forest. Either they should have waited for the Supreme Court to finalize the criteria or the default position should been to record the entire range as forest." Activist Col (retired) Sarvadaman Oberoi, who has dragged Haryana government to court on several issues, alleged that unseen forces seem to be behind the government's latest move. "There is something afoot," he said. Officials are currently carrying out ground surveys of NCZs in each district of NCR to delineate forests, recharge zones, major water bodies and river beds. Forest cover constitutes just 3.5% of land in Haryana.