Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/are-you-taking-care-of-pregnant-inmates-top-court-asks-states-dhananjay-mahapatra-22210/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/are-you-taking-care-of-pregnant-inmates-top-court-asks-states-dhananjay-mahapatra-22210/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/are-you-taking-care-of-pregnant-inmates-top-court-asks-states-dhananjay-mahapatra-22210/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/are-you-taking-care-of-pregnant-inmates-top-court-asks-states-dhananjay-mahapatra-22210/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f3fdb658101-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f3fdb658101-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f3fdb658101-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f3fdb658101-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f3fdb658101-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f3fdb658101-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f3fdb658101-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f3fdb658101-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f3fdb658101-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 22062, 'title' => 'Are you taking care of pregnant inmates, top court asks states -Dhananjay Mahapatra', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> <em>NEW DELHI: </em>Are you taking proper care of pregnant inmates and ensuring that the children born to women prisoners do not grow up in the shadow of criminals? the Supreme Court asked the states and ordered inspection of their prisons. </p> <p align="justify"> A bench of Chief Justice P Sathasivam and Justices Ranjana Desai and Ranjan Gogoi on Thursday ordered, &quot;We direct all the State Legal Services Authorities to inspect all jails including sub-jails in their states, take note of the prevailing situations in terms of the various directions issued in court's order dated April 13, 2006, and submit a detailed report to this court within a period of eight weeks from today.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> Amicus curiae - senior advocate Ranjit Kumar and lawyer Binu Tamta - brought to the SC's notice that though the court had in 2006 ordered the states to take salutary steps to make pregnant inmates lives a little comfortable within the four walls of the jails and to prevent criminality cast shadow on the children born in prisons, there had been no information supplied to the court since 2007. </p> <p align="justify"> The April 13 order seven years ago was passed by the SC in response to a PIL filed by R D Upadhyay complaining that governments were not bothered about scars of incarceration on little children lodged in jails along with their mothers or been concerned about the needs of pregnant women put behind bars. </p> <p align="justify"> The court ordered the Centre and states to provide within three months cradles, creche, daycare centres and woman doctors in prisons to take care of pregnant inmates and dependent children lodged along with mothers in jails across the country. </p> <p align="justify"> As per 2006 figures, the number of women inmates, including convicts and undertrials, in the country was around 10,000. Nearly 1,000 children were also incarcerated along with their mothers. Their only fault was they were dependent on their mothers. The court had issued a series of guidelines in an attempt to improve the living conditions of these children, who were victims of circumstances. </p> <p align="justify"> Children lodged in prisons because they are dependent on their mothers, who are behind bars, won't treated as undertrials, the SC had said trying to erase the prisoner tag from the young ones. </p> <p align="justify"> It had ordered that those born to women inmates would be given a 'clean' birth certificate. The infant's place of birth would not be shown as prison, it would preferably be noted as 'home', the court had said. </p> <p align="justify"> The court had understood the need of the child to be with its mother till the age of six and allowed women prisoners to keep their wards with them till they attained the specified age. </p> <p align="justify"> The infants would have provision for nurseries and other facilities required for their protection inside prison and mother and child would get adequate and regular medical attention from a 'lady doctor', it had ordered. </p> <p align="justify"> Covering the finer points relating to proper development of a child and to avoid the scars of prison casting a shadow on their future life, the court had ordered jail authorities to provide proper facilities for their education and recreation. </p> <p align="justify"> The children and the mothers with new-born would be provided with nutrients and proper diet, including fruits and milk etc, it said. When the mother of the infant falls ill, alternative provisions would be made to take care of the infant. </p> <p align="justify"> Stressing on education facilities for children lodged along with mothers, the court said if such facilities were not available, then the inmate would be shifted to the nearest prison where she and her children could avail of them, it had said. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 4 August, 2013, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Are-you-taking-care-of-pregnant-inmates-top-court-asks-states/articleshow/21586521.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'are-you-taking-care-of-pregnant-inmates-top-court-asks-states-dhananjay-mahapatra-22210', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 22210, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 22062, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Are you taking care of pregnant inmates, top court asks states -Dhananjay Mahapatra', 'metaKeywords' => 'Human Rights,Law and Justice,Gender Equality,Gender', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Times of India NEW DELHI: Are you taking proper care of pregnant inmates and ensuring that the children born to women prisoners do not grow up in the shadow of criminals? the Supreme Court asked the states and ordered inspection...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>Are you taking proper care of pregnant inmates and ensuring that the children born to women prisoners do not grow up in the shadow of criminals? the Supreme Court asked the states and ordered inspection of their prisons.</p><p align="justify">A bench of Chief Justice P Sathasivam and Justices Ranjana Desai and Ranjan Gogoi on Thursday ordered, &quot;We direct all the State Legal Services Authorities to inspect all jails including sub-jails in their states, take note of the prevailing situations in terms of the various directions issued in court's order dated April 13, 2006, and submit a detailed report to this court within a period of eight weeks from today.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Amicus curiae - senior advocate Ranjit Kumar and lawyer Binu Tamta - brought to the SC's notice that though the court had in 2006 ordered the states to take salutary steps to make pregnant inmates lives a little comfortable within the four walls of the jails and to prevent criminality cast shadow on the children born in prisons, there had been no information supplied to the court since 2007.</p><p align="justify">The April 13 order seven years ago was passed by the SC in response to a PIL filed by R D Upadhyay complaining that governments were not bothered about scars of incarceration on little children lodged in jails along with their mothers or been concerned about the needs of pregnant women put behind bars.</p><p align="justify">The court ordered the Centre and states to provide within three months cradles, creche, daycare centres and woman doctors in prisons to take care of pregnant inmates and dependent children lodged along with mothers in jails across the country.</p><p align="justify">As per 2006 figures, the number of women inmates, including convicts and undertrials, in the country was around 10,000. Nearly 1,000 children were also incarcerated along with their mothers. Their only fault was they were dependent on their mothers. The court had issued a series of guidelines in an attempt to improve the living conditions of these children, who were victims of circumstances.</p><p align="justify">Children lodged in prisons because they are dependent on their mothers, who are behind bars, won't treated as undertrials, the SC had said trying to erase the prisoner tag from the young ones.</p><p align="justify">It had ordered that those born to women inmates would be given a 'clean' birth certificate. The infant's place of birth would not be shown as prison, it would preferably be noted as 'home', the court had said.</p><p align="justify">The court had understood the need of the child to be with its mother till the age of six and allowed women prisoners to keep their wards with them till they attained the specified age.</p><p align="justify">The infants would have provision for nurseries and other facilities required for their protection inside prison and mother and child would get adequate and regular medical attention from a 'lady doctor', it had ordered.</p><p align="justify">Covering the finer points relating to proper development of a child and to avoid the scars of prison casting a shadow on their future life, the court had ordered jail authorities to provide proper facilities for their education and recreation.</p><p align="justify">The children and the mothers with new-born would be provided with nutrients and proper diet, including fruits and milk etc, it said. When the mother of the infant falls ill, alternative provisions would be made to take care of the infant.</p><p align="justify">Stressing on education facilities for children lodged along with mothers, the court said if such facilities were not available, then the inmate would be shifted to the nearest prison where she and her children could avail of them, it had said.</p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 22062, 'title' => 'Are you taking care of pregnant inmates, top court asks states -Dhananjay Mahapatra', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> <em>NEW DELHI: </em>Are you taking proper care of pregnant inmates and ensuring that the children born to women prisoners do not grow up in the shadow of criminals? the Supreme Court asked the states and ordered inspection of their prisons. </p> <p align="justify"> A bench of Chief Justice P Sathasivam and Justices Ranjana Desai and Ranjan Gogoi on Thursday ordered, &quot;We direct all the State Legal Services Authorities to inspect all jails including sub-jails in their states, take note of the prevailing situations in terms of the various directions issued in court's order dated April 13, 2006, and submit a detailed report to this court within a period of eight weeks from today.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> Amicus curiae - senior advocate Ranjit Kumar and lawyer Binu Tamta - brought to the SC's notice that though the court had in 2006 ordered the states to take salutary steps to make pregnant inmates lives a little comfortable within the four walls of the jails and to prevent criminality cast shadow on the children born in prisons, there had been no information supplied to the court since 2007. </p> <p align="justify"> The April 13 order seven years ago was passed by the SC in response to a PIL filed by R D Upadhyay complaining that governments were not bothered about scars of incarceration on little children lodged in jails along with their mothers or been concerned about the needs of pregnant women put behind bars. </p> <p align="justify"> The court ordered the Centre and states to provide within three months cradles, creche, daycare centres and woman doctors in prisons to take care of pregnant inmates and dependent children lodged along with mothers in jails across the country. </p> <p align="justify"> As per 2006 figures, the number of women inmates, including convicts and undertrials, in the country was around 10,000. Nearly 1,000 children were also incarcerated along with their mothers. Their only fault was they were dependent on their mothers. The court had issued a series of guidelines in an attempt to improve the living conditions of these children, who were victims of circumstances. </p> <p align="justify"> Children lodged in prisons because they are dependent on their mothers, who are behind bars, won't treated as undertrials, the SC had said trying to erase the prisoner tag from the young ones. </p> <p align="justify"> It had ordered that those born to women inmates would be given a 'clean' birth certificate. The infant's place of birth would not be shown as prison, it would preferably be noted as 'home', the court had said. </p> <p align="justify"> The court had understood the need of the child to be with its mother till the age of six and allowed women prisoners to keep their wards with them till they attained the specified age. </p> <p align="justify"> The infants would have provision for nurseries and other facilities required for their protection inside prison and mother and child would get adequate and regular medical attention from a 'lady doctor', it had ordered. </p> <p align="justify"> Covering the finer points relating to proper development of a child and to avoid the scars of prison casting a shadow on their future life, the court had ordered jail authorities to provide proper facilities for their education and recreation. </p> <p align="justify"> The children and the mothers with new-born would be provided with nutrients and proper diet, including fruits and milk etc, it said. When the mother of the infant falls ill, alternative provisions would be made to take care of the infant. </p> <p align="justify"> Stressing on education facilities for children lodged along with mothers, the court said if such facilities were not available, then the inmate would be shifted to the nearest prison where she and her children could avail of them, it had said. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 4 August, 2013, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Are-you-taking-care-of-pregnant-inmates-top-court-asks-states/articleshow/21586521.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'are-you-taking-care-of-pregnant-inmates-top-court-asks-states-dhananjay-mahapatra-22210', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 22210, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 22062 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Are you taking care of pregnant inmates, top court asks states -Dhananjay Mahapatra' $metaKeywords = 'Human Rights,Law and Justice,Gender Equality,Gender' $metaDesc = ' -The Times of India NEW DELHI: Are you taking proper care of pregnant inmates and ensuring that the children born to women prisoners do not grow up in the shadow of criminals? the Supreme Court asked the states and ordered inspection...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>Are you taking proper care of pregnant inmates and ensuring that the children born to women prisoners do not grow up in the shadow of criminals? the Supreme Court asked the states and ordered inspection of their prisons.</p><p align="justify">A bench of Chief Justice P Sathasivam and Justices Ranjana Desai and Ranjan Gogoi on Thursday ordered, &quot;We direct all the State Legal Services Authorities to inspect all jails including sub-jails in their states, take note of the prevailing situations in terms of the various directions issued in court's order dated April 13, 2006, and submit a detailed report to this court within a period of eight weeks from today.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Amicus curiae - senior advocate Ranjit Kumar and lawyer Binu Tamta - brought to the SC's notice that though the court had in 2006 ordered the states to take salutary steps to make pregnant inmates lives a little comfortable within the four walls of the jails and to prevent criminality cast shadow on the children born in prisons, there had been no information supplied to the court since 2007.</p><p align="justify">The April 13 order seven years ago was passed by the SC in response to a PIL filed by R D Upadhyay complaining that governments were not bothered about scars of incarceration on little children lodged in jails along with their mothers or been concerned about the needs of pregnant women put behind bars.</p><p align="justify">The court ordered the Centre and states to provide within three months cradles, creche, daycare centres and woman doctors in prisons to take care of pregnant inmates and dependent children lodged along with mothers in jails across the country.</p><p align="justify">As per 2006 figures, the number of women inmates, including convicts and undertrials, in the country was around 10,000. Nearly 1,000 children were also incarcerated along with their mothers. Their only fault was they were dependent on their mothers. The court had issued a series of guidelines in an attempt to improve the living conditions of these children, who were victims of circumstances.</p><p align="justify">Children lodged in prisons because they are dependent on their mothers, who are behind bars, won't treated as undertrials, the SC had said trying to erase the prisoner tag from the young ones.</p><p align="justify">It had ordered that those born to women inmates would be given a 'clean' birth certificate. The infant's place of birth would not be shown as prison, it would preferably be noted as 'home', the court had said.</p><p align="justify">The court had understood the need of the child to be with its mother till the age of six and allowed women prisoners to keep their wards with them till they attained the specified age.</p><p align="justify">The infants would have provision for nurseries and other facilities required for their protection inside prison and mother and child would get adequate and regular medical attention from a 'lady doctor', it had ordered.</p><p align="justify">Covering the finer points relating to proper development of a child and to avoid the scars of prison casting a shadow on their future life, the court had ordered jail authorities to provide proper facilities for their education and recreation.</p><p align="justify">The children and the mothers with new-born would be provided with nutrients and proper diet, including fruits and milk etc, it said. When the mother of the infant falls ill, alternative provisions would be made to take care of the infant.</p><p align="justify">Stressing on education facilities for children lodged along with mothers, the court said if such facilities were not available, then the inmate would be shifted to the nearest prison where she and her children could avail of them, it had said.</p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/are-you-taking-care-of-pregnant-inmates-top-court-asks-states-dhananjay-mahapatra-22210.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Are you taking care of pregnant inmates, top court asks states -Dhananjay Mahapatra | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Times of India NEW DELHI: Are you taking proper care of pregnant inmates and ensuring that the children born to women prisoners do not grow up in the shadow of criminals? the Supreme Court asked the states and ordered inspection..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Are you taking care of pregnant inmates, top court asks states -Dhananjay Mahapatra</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>Are you taking proper care of pregnant inmates and ensuring that the children born to women prisoners do not grow up in the shadow of criminals? the Supreme Court asked the states and ordered inspection of their prisons.</p><p align="justify">A bench of Chief Justice P Sathasivam and Justices Ranjana Desai and Ranjan Gogoi on Thursday ordered, "We direct all the State Legal Services Authorities to inspect all jails including sub-jails in their states, take note of the prevailing situations in terms of the various directions issued in court's order dated April 13, 2006, and submit a detailed report to this court within a period of eight weeks from today."</p><p align="justify">Amicus curiae - senior advocate Ranjit Kumar and lawyer Binu Tamta - brought to the SC's notice that though the court had in 2006 ordered the states to take salutary steps to make pregnant inmates lives a little comfortable within the four walls of the jails and to prevent criminality cast shadow on the children born in prisons, there had been no information supplied to the court since 2007.</p><p align="justify">The April 13 order seven years ago was passed by the SC in response to a PIL filed by R D Upadhyay complaining that governments were not bothered about scars of incarceration on little children lodged in jails along with their mothers or been concerned about the needs of pregnant women put behind bars.</p><p align="justify">The court ordered the Centre and states to provide within three months cradles, creche, daycare centres and woman doctors in prisons to take care of pregnant inmates and dependent children lodged along with mothers in jails across the country.</p><p align="justify">As per 2006 figures, the number of women inmates, including convicts and undertrials, in the country was around 10,000. Nearly 1,000 children were also incarcerated along with their mothers. Their only fault was they were dependent on their mothers. The court had issued a series of guidelines in an attempt to improve the living conditions of these children, who were victims of circumstances.</p><p align="justify">Children lodged in prisons because they are dependent on their mothers, who are behind bars, won't treated as undertrials, the SC had said trying to erase the prisoner tag from the young ones.</p><p align="justify">It had ordered that those born to women inmates would be given a 'clean' birth certificate. The infant's place of birth would not be shown as prison, it would preferably be noted as 'home', the court had said.</p><p align="justify">The court had understood the need of the child to be with its mother till the age of six and allowed women prisoners to keep their wards with them till they attained the specified age.</p><p align="justify">The infants would have provision for nurseries and other facilities required for their protection inside prison and mother and child would get adequate and regular medical attention from a 'lady doctor', it had ordered.</p><p align="justify">Covering the finer points relating to proper development of a child and to avoid the scars of prison casting a shadow on their future life, the court had ordered jail authorities to provide proper facilities for their education and recreation.</p><p align="justify">The children and the mothers with new-born would be provided with nutrients and proper diet, including fruits and milk etc, it said. When the mother of the infant falls ill, alternative provisions would be made to take care of the infant.</p><p align="justify">Stressing on education facilities for children lodged along with mothers, the court said if such facilities were not available, then the inmate would be shifted to the nearest prison where she and her children could avail of them, it had said.</p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f3fdb658101-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f3fdb658101-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f3fdb658101-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f3fdb658101-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f3fdb658101-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f3fdb658101-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f3fdb658101-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f3fdb658101-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f3fdb658101-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 22062, 'title' => 'Are you taking care of pregnant inmates, top court asks states -Dhananjay Mahapatra', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> <em>NEW DELHI: </em>Are you taking proper care of pregnant inmates and ensuring that the children born to women prisoners do not grow up in the shadow of criminals? the Supreme Court asked the states and ordered inspection of their prisons. </p> <p align="justify"> A bench of Chief Justice P Sathasivam and Justices Ranjana Desai and Ranjan Gogoi on Thursday ordered, &quot;We direct all the State Legal Services Authorities to inspect all jails including sub-jails in their states, take note of the prevailing situations in terms of the various directions issued in court's order dated April 13, 2006, and submit a detailed report to this court within a period of eight weeks from today.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> Amicus curiae - senior advocate Ranjit Kumar and lawyer Binu Tamta - brought to the SC's notice that though the court had in 2006 ordered the states to take salutary steps to make pregnant inmates lives a little comfortable within the four walls of the jails and to prevent criminality cast shadow on the children born in prisons, there had been no information supplied to the court since 2007. </p> <p align="justify"> The April 13 order seven years ago was passed by the SC in response to a PIL filed by R D Upadhyay complaining that governments were not bothered about scars of incarceration on little children lodged in jails along with their mothers or been concerned about the needs of pregnant women put behind bars. </p> <p align="justify"> The court ordered the Centre and states to provide within three months cradles, creche, daycare centres and woman doctors in prisons to take care of pregnant inmates and dependent children lodged along with mothers in jails across the country. </p> <p align="justify"> As per 2006 figures, the number of women inmates, including convicts and undertrials, in the country was around 10,000. Nearly 1,000 children were also incarcerated along with their mothers. Their only fault was they were dependent on their mothers. The court had issued a series of guidelines in an attempt to improve the living conditions of these children, who were victims of circumstances. </p> <p align="justify"> Children lodged in prisons because they are dependent on their mothers, who are behind bars, won't treated as undertrials, the SC had said trying to erase the prisoner tag from the young ones. </p> <p align="justify"> It had ordered that those born to women inmates would be given a 'clean' birth certificate. The infant's place of birth would not be shown as prison, it would preferably be noted as 'home', the court had said. </p> <p align="justify"> The court had understood the need of the child to be with its mother till the age of six and allowed women prisoners to keep their wards with them till they attained the specified age. </p> <p align="justify"> The infants would have provision for nurseries and other facilities required for their protection inside prison and mother and child would get adequate and regular medical attention from a 'lady doctor', it had ordered. </p> <p align="justify"> Covering the finer points relating to proper development of a child and to avoid the scars of prison casting a shadow on their future life, the court had ordered jail authorities to provide proper facilities for their education and recreation. </p> <p align="justify"> The children and the mothers with new-born would be provided with nutrients and proper diet, including fruits and milk etc, it said. When the mother of the infant falls ill, alternative provisions would be made to take care of the infant. </p> <p align="justify"> Stressing on education facilities for children lodged along with mothers, the court said if such facilities were not available, then the inmate would be shifted to the nearest prison where she and her children could avail of them, it had said. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 4 August, 2013, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Are-you-taking-care-of-pregnant-inmates-top-court-asks-states/articleshow/21586521.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'are-you-taking-care-of-pregnant-inmates-top-court-asks-states-dhananjay-mahapatra-22210', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 22210, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 22062, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Are you taking care of pregnant inmates, top court asks states -Dhananjay Mahapatra', 'metaKeywords' => 'Human Rights,Law and Justice,Gender Equality,Gender', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Times of India NEW DELHI: Are you taking proper care of pregnant inmates and ensuring that the children born to women prisoners do not grow up in the shadow of criminals? the Supreme Court asked the states and ordered inspection...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>Are you taking proper care of pregnant inmates and ensuring that the children born to women prisoners do not grow up in the shadow of criminals? the Supreme Court asked the states and ordered inspection of their prisons.</p><p align="justify">A bench of Chief Justice P Sathasivam and Justices Ranjana Desai and Ranjan Gogoi on Thursday ordered, &quot;We direct all the State Legal Services Authorities to inspect all jails including sub-jails in their states, take note of the prevailing situations in terms of the various directions issued in court's order dated April 13, 2006, and submit a detailed report to this court within a period of eight weeks from today.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Amicus curiae - senior advocate Ranjit Kumar and lawyer Binu Tamta - brought to the SC's notice that though the court had in 2006 ordered the states to take salutary steps to make pregnant inmates lives a little comfortable within the four walls of the jails and to prevent criminality cast shadow on the children born in prisons, there had been no information supplied to the court since 2007.</p><p align="justify">The April 13 order seven years ago was passed by the SC in response to a PIL filed by R D Upadhyay complaining that governments were not bothered about scars of incarceration on little children lodged in jails along with their mothers or been concerned about the needs of pregnant women put behind bars.</p><p align="justify">The court ordered the Centre and states to provide within three months cradles, creche, daycare centres and woman doctors in prisons to take care of pregnant inmates and dependent children lodged along with mothers in jails across the country.</p><p align="justify">As per 2006 figures, the number of women inmates, including convicts and undertrials, in the country was around 10,000. Nearly 1,000 children were also incarcerated along with their mothers. Their only fault was they were dependent on their mothers. The court had issued a series of guidelines in an attempt to improve the living conditions of these children, who were victims of circumstances.</p><p align="justify">Children lodged in prisons because they are dependent on their mothers, who are behind bars, won't treated as undertrials, the SC had said trying to erase the prisoner tag from the young ones.</p><p align="justify">It had ordered that those born to women inmates would be given a 'clean' birth certificate. The infant's place of birth would not be shown as prison, it would preferably be noted as 'home', the court had said.</p><p align="justify">The court had understood the need of the child to be with its mother till the age of six and allowed women prisoners to keep their wards with them till they attained the specified age.</p><p align="justify">The infants would have provision for nurseries and other facilities required for their protection inside prison and mother and child would get adequate and regular medical attention from a 'lady doctor', it had ordered.</p><p align="justify">Covering the finer points relating to proper development of a child and to avoid the scars of prison casting a shadow on their future life, the court had ordered jail authorities to provide proper facilities for their education and recreation.</p><p align="justify">The children and the mothers with new-born would be provided with nutrients and proper diet, including fruits and milk etc, it said. When the mother of the infant falls ill, alternative provisions would be made to take care of the infant.</p><p align="justify">Stressing on education facilities for children lodged along with mothers, the court said if such facilities were not available, then the inmate would be shifted to the nearest prison where she and her children could avail of them, it had said.</p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 22062, 'title' => 'Are you taking care of pregnant inmates, top court asks states -Dhananjay Mahapatra', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> <em>NEW DELHI: </em>Are you taking proper care of pregnant inmates and ensuring that the children born to women prisoners do not grow up in the shadow of criminals? the Supreme Court asked the states and ordered inspection of their prisons. </p> <p align="justify"> A bench of Chief Justice P Sathasivam and Justices Ranjana Desai and Ranjan Gogoi on Thursday ordered, &quot;We direct all the State Legal Services Authorities to inspect all jails including sub-jails in their states, take note of the prevailing situations in terms of the various directions issued in court's order dated April 13, 2006, and submit a detailed report to this court within a period of eight weeks from today.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> Amicus curiae - senior advocate Ranjit Kumar and lawyer Binu Tamta - brought to the SC's notice that though the court had in 2006 ordered the states to take salutary steps to make pregnant inmates lives a little comfortable within the four walls of the jails and to prevent criminality cast shadow on the children born in prisons, there had been no information supplied to the court since 2007. </p> <p align="justify"> The April 13 order seven years ago was passed by the SC in response to a PIL filed by R D Upadhyay complaining that governments were not bothered about scars of incarceration on little children lodged in jails along with their mothers or been concerned about the needs of pregnant women put behind bars. </p> <p align="justify"> The court ordered the Centre and states to provide within three months cradles, creche, daycare centres and woman doctors in prisons to take care of pregnant inmates and dependent children lodged along with mothers in jails across the country. </p> <p align="justify"> As per 2006 figures, the number of women inmates, including convicts and undertrials, in the country was around 10,000. Nearly 1,000 children were also incarcerated along with their mothers. Their only fault was they were dependent on their mothers. The court had issued a series of guidelines in an attempt to improve the living conditions of these children, who were victims of circumstances. </p> <p align="justify"> Children lodged in prisons because they are dependent on their mothers, who are behind bars, won't treated as undertrials, the SC had said trying to erase the prisoner tag from the young ones. </p> <p align="justify"> It had ordered that those born to women inmates would be given a 'clean' birth certificate. The infant's place of birth would not be shown as prison, it would preferably be noted as 'home', the court had said. </p> <p align="justify"> The court had understood the need of the child to be with its mother till the age of six and allowed women prisoners to keep their wards with them till they attained the specified age. </p> <p align="justify"> The infants would have provision for nurseries and other facilities required for their protection inside prison and mother and child would get adequate and regular medical attention from a 'lady doctor', it had ordered. </p> <p align="justify"> Covering the finer points relating to proper development of a child and to avoid the scars of prison casting a shadow on their future life, the court had ordered jail authorities to provide proper facilities for their education and recreation. </p> <p align="justify"> The children and the mothers with new-born would be provided with nutrients and proper diet, including fruits and milk etc, it said. When the mother of the infant falls ill, alternative provisions would be made to take care of the infant. </p> <p align="justify"> Stressing on education facilities for children lodged along with mothers, the court said if such facilities were not available, then the inmate would be shifted to the nearest prison where she and her children could avail of them, it had said. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 4 August, 2013, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Are-you-taking-care-of-pregnant-inmates-top-court-asks-states/articleshow/21586521.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'are-you-taking-care-of-pregnant-inmates-top-court-asks-states-dhananjay-mahapatra-22210', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 22210, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 22062 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Are you taking care of pregnant inmates, top court asks states -Dhananjay Mahapatra' $metaKeywords = 'Human Rights,Law and Justice,Gender Equality,Gender' $metaDesc = ' -The Times of India NEW DELHI: Are you taking proper care of pregnant inmates and ensuring that the children born to women prisoners do not grow up in the shadow of criminals? the Supreme Court asked the states and ordered inspection...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>Are you taking proper care of pregnant inmates and ensuring that the children born to women prisoners do not grow up in the shadow of criminals? the Supreme Court asked the states and ordered inspection of their prisons.</p><p align="justify">A bench of Chief Justice P Sathasivam and Justices Ranjana Desai and Ranjan Gogoi on Thursday ordered, &quot;We direct all the State Legal Services Authorities to inspect all jails including sub-jails in their states, take note of the prevailing situations in terms of the various directions issued in court's order dated April 13, 2006, and submit a detailed report to this court within a period of eight weeks from today.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Amicus curiae - senior advocate Ranjit Kumar and lawyer Binu Tamta - brought to the SC's notice that though the court had in 2006 ordered the states to take salutary steps to make pregnant inmates lives a little comfortable within the four walls of the jails and to prevent criminality cast shadow on the children born in prisons, there had been no information supplied to the court since 2007.</p><p align="justify">The April 13 order seven years ago was passed by the SC in response to a PIL filed by R D Upadhyay complaining that governments were not bothered about scars of incarceration on little children lodged in jails along with their mothers or been concerned about the needs of pregnant women put behind bars.</p><p align="justify">The court ordered the Centre and states to provide within three months cradles, creche, daycare centres and woman doctors in prisons to take care of pregnant inmates and dependent children lodged along with mothers in jails across the country.</p><p align="justify">As per 2006 figures, the number of women inmates, including convicts and undertrials, in the country was around 10,000. Nearly 1,000 children were also incarcerated along with their mothers. Their only fault was they were dependent on their mothers. The court had issued a series of guidelines in an attempt to improve the living conditions of these children, who were victims of circumstances.</p><p align="justify">Children lodged in prisons because they are dependent on their mothers, who are behind bars, won't treated as undertrials, the SC had said trying to erase the prisoner tag from the young ones.</p><p align="justify">It had ordered that those born to women inmates would be given a 'clean' birth certificate. The infant's place of birth would not be shown as prison, it would preferably be noted as 'home', the court had said.</p><p align="justify">The court had understood the need of the child to be with its mother till the age of six and allowed women prisoners to keep their wards with them till they attained the specified age.</p><p align="justify">The infants would have provision for nurseries and other facilities required for their protection inside prison and mother and child would get adequate and regular medical attention from a 'lady doctor', it had ordered.</p><p align="justify">Covering the finer points relating to proper development of a child and to avoid the scars of prison casting a shadow on their future life, the court had ordered jail authorities to provide proper facilities for their education and recreation.</p><p align="justify">The children and the mothers with new-born would be provided with nutrients and proper diet, including fruits and milk etc, it said. When the mother of the infant falls ill, alternative provisions would be made to take care of the infant.</p><p align="justify">Stressing on education facilities for children lodged along with mothers, the court said if such facilities were not available, then the inmate would be shifted to the nearest prison where she and her children could avail of them, it had said.</p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/are-you-taking-care-of-pregnant-inmates-top-court-asks-states-dhananjay-mahapatra-22210.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Are you taking care of pregnant inmates, top court asks states -Dhananjay Mahapatra | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Times of India NEW DELHI: Are you taking proper care of pregnant inmates and ensuring that the children born to women prisoners do not grow up in the shadow of criminals? the Supreme Court asked the states and ordered inspection..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Are you taking care of pregnant inmates, top court asks states -Dhananjay Mahapatra</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>Are you taking proper care of pregnant inmates and ensuring that the children born to women prisoners do not grow up in the shadow of criminals? the Supreme Court asked the states and ordered inspection of their prisons.</p><p align="justify">A bench of Chief Justice P Sathasivam and Justices Ranjana Desai and Ranjan Gogoi on Thursday ordered, "We direct all the State Legal Services Authorities to inspect all jails including sub-jails in their states, take note of the prevailing situations in terms of the various directions issued in court's order dated April 13, 2006, and submit a detailed report to this court within a period of eight weeks from today."</p><p align="justify">Amicus curiae - senior advocate Ranjit Kumar and lawyer Binu Tamta - brought to the SC's notice that though the court had in 2006 ordered the states to take salutary steps to make pregnant inmates lives a little comfortable within the four walls of the jails and to prevent criminality cast shadow on the children born in prisons, there had been no information supplied to the court since 2007.</p><p align="justify">The April 13 order seven years ago was passed by the SC in response to a PIL filed by R D Upadhyay complaining that governments were not bothered about scars of incarceration on little children lodged in jails along with their mothers or been concerned about the needs of pregnant women put behind bars.</p><p align="justify">The court ordered the Centre and states to provide within three months cradles, creche, daycare centres and woman doctors in prisons to take care of pregnant inmates and dependent children lodged along with mothers in jails across the country.</p><p align="justify">As per 2006 figures, the number of women inmates, including convicts and undertrials, in the country was around 10,000. Nearly 1,000 children were also incarcerated along with their mothers. Their only fault was they were dependent on their mothers. The court had issued a series of guidelines in an attempt to improve the living conditions of these children, who were victims of circumstances.</p><p align="justify">Children lodged in prisons because they are dependent on their mothers, who are behind bars, won't treated as undertrials, the SC had said trying to erase the prisoner tag from the young ones.</p><p align="justify">It had ordered that those born to women inmates would be given a 'clean' birth certificate. The infant's place of birth would not be shown as prison, it would preferably be noted as 'home', the court had said.</p><p align="justify">The court had understood the need of the child to be with its mother till the age of six and allowed women prisoners to keep their wards with them till they attained the specified age.</p><p align="justify">The infants would have provision for nurseries and other facilities required for their protection inside prison and mother and child would get adequate and regular medical attention from a 'lady doctor', it had ordered.</p><p align="justify">Covering the finer points relating to proper development of a child and to avoid the scars of prison casting a shadow on their future life, the court had ordered jail authorities to provide proper facilities for their education and recreation.</p><p align="justify">The children and the mothers with new-born would be provided with nutrients and proper diet, including fruits and milk etc, it said. When the mother of the infant falls ill, alternative provisions would be made to take care of the infant.</p><p align="justify">Stressing on education facilities for children lodged along with mothers, the court said if such facilities were not available, then the inmate would be shifted to the nearest prison where she and her children could avail of them, it had said.</p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f3fdb658101-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f3fdb658101-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f3fdb658101-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f3fdb658101-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f3fdb658101-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f3fdb658101-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f3fdb658101-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f3fdb658101-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f3fdb658101-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 22062, 'title' => 'Are you taking care of pregnant inmates, top court asks states -Dhananjay Mahapatra', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> <em>NEW DELHI: </em>Are you taking proper care of pregnant inmates and ensuring that the children born to women prisoners do not grow up in the shadow of criminals? the Supreme Court asked the states and ordered inspection of their prisons. </p> <p align="justify"> A bench of Chief Justice P Sathasivam and Justices Ranjana Desai and Ranjan Gogoi on Thursday ordered, &quot;We direct all the State Legal Services Authorities to inspect all jails including sub-jails in their states, take note of the prevailing situations in terms of the various directions issued in court's order dated April 13, 2006, and submit a detailed report to this court within a period of eight weeks from today.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> Amicus curiae - senior advocate Ranjit Kumar and lawyer Binu Tamta - brought to the SC's notice that though the court had in 2006 ordered the states to take salutary steps to make pregnant inmates lives a little comfortable within the four walls of the jails and to prevent criminality cast shadow on the children born in prisons, there had been no information supplied to the court since 2007. </p> <p align="justify"> The April 13 order seven years ago was passed by the SC in response to a PIL filed by R D Upadhyay complaining that governments were not bothered about scars of incarceration on little children lodged in jails along with their mothers or been concerned about the needs of pregnant women put behind bars. </p> <p align="justify"> The court ordered the Centre and states to provide within three months cradles, creche, daycare centres and woman doctors in prisons to take care of pregnant inmates and dependent children lodged along with mothers in jails across the country. </p> <p align="justify"> As per 2006 figures, the number of women inmates, including convicts and undertrials, in the country was around 10,000. Nearly 1,000 children were also incarcerated along with their mothers. Their only fault was they were dependent on their mothers. The court had issued a series of guidelines in an attempt to improve the living conditions of these children, who were victims of circumstances. </p> <p align="justify"> Children lodged in prisons because they are dependent on their mothers, who are behind bars, won't treated as undertrials, the SC had said trying to erase the prisoner tag from the young ones. </p> <p align="justify"> It had ordered that those born to women inmates would be given a 'clean' birth certificate. The infant's place of birth would not be shown as prison, it would preferably be noted as 'home', the court had said. </p> <p align="justify"> The court had understood the need of the child to be with its mother till the age of six and allowed women prisoners to keep their wards with them till they attained the specified age. </p> <p align="justify"> The infants would have provision for nurseries and other facilities required for their protection inside prison and mother and child would get adequate and regular medical attention from a 'lady doctor', it had ordered. </p> <p align="justify"> Covering the finer points relating to proper development of a child and to avoid the scars of prison casting a shadow on their future life, the court had ordered jail authorities to provide proper facilities for their education and recreation. </p> <p align="justify"> The children and the mothers with new-born would be provided with nutrients and proper diet, including fruits and milk etc, it said. When the mother of the infant falls ill, alternative provisions would be made to take care of the infant. </p> <p align="justify"> Stressing on education facilities for children lodged along with mothers, the court said if such facilities were not available, then the inmate would be shifted to the nearest prison where she and her children could avail of them, it had said. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 4 August, 2013, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Are-you-taking-care-of-pregnant-inmates-top-court-asks-states/articleshow/21586521.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'are-you-taking-care-of-pregnant-inmates-top-court-asks-states-dhananjay-mahapatra-22210', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 22210, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 22062, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Are you taking care of pregnant inmates, top court asks states -Dhananjay Mahapatra', 'metaKeywords' => 'Human Rights,Law and Justice,Gender Equality,Gender', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Times of India NEW DELHI: Are you taking proper care of pregnant inmates and ensuring that the children born to women prisoners do not grow up in the shadow of criminals? the Supreme Court asked the states and ordered inspection...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>Are you taking proper care of pregnant inmates and ensuring that the children born to women prisoners do not grow up in the shadow of criminals? the Supreme Court asked the states and ordered inspection of their prisons.</p><p align="justify">A bench of Chief Justice P Sathasivam and Justices Ranjana Desai and Ranjan Gogoi on Thursday ordered, &quot;We direct all the State Legal Services Authorities to inspect all jails including sub-jails in their states, take note of the prevailing situations in terms of the various directions issued in court's order dated April 13, 2006, and submit a detailed report to this court within a period of eight weeks from today.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Amicus curiae - senior advocate Ranjit Kumar and lawyer Binu Tamta - brought to the SC's notice that though the court had in 2006 ordered the states to take salutary steps to make pregnant inmates lives a little comfortable within the four walls of the jails and to prevent criminality cast shadow on the children born in prisons, there had been no information supplied to the court since 2007.</p><p align="justify">The April 13 order seven years ago was passed by the SC in response to a PIL filed by R D Upadhyay complaining that governments were not bothered about scars of incarceration on little children lodged in jails along with their mothers or been concerned about the needs of pregnant women put behind bars.</p><p align="justify">The court ordered the Centre and states to provide within three months cradles, creche, daycare centres and woman doctors in prisons to take care of pregnant inmates and dependent children lodged along with mothers in jails across the country.</p><p align="justify">As per 2006 figures, the number of women inmates, including convicts and undertrials, in the country was around 10,000. Nearly 1,000 children were also incarcerated along with their mothers. Their only fault was they were dependent on their mothers. The court had issued a series of guidelines in an attempt to improve the living conditions of these children, who were victims of circumstances.</p><p align="justify">Children lodged in prisons because they are dependent on their mothers, who are behind bars, won't treated as undertrials, the SC had said trying to erase the prisoner tag from the young ones.</p><p align="justify">It had ordered that those born to women inmates would be given a 'clean' birth certificate. The infant's place of birth would not be shown as prison, it would preferably be noted as 'home', the court had said.</p><p align="justify">The court had understood the need of the child to be with its mother till the age of six and allowed women prisoners to keep their wards with them till they attained the specified age.</p><p align="justify">The infants would have provision for nurseries and other facilities required for their protection inside prison and mother and child would get adequate and regular medical attention from a 'lady doctor', it had ordered.</p><p align="justify">Covering the finer points relating to proper development of a child and to avoid the scars of prison casting a shadow on their future life, the court had ordered jail authorities to provide proper facilities for their education and recreation.</p><p align="justify">The children and the mothers with new-born would be provided with nutrients and proper diet, including fruits and milk etc, it said. When the mother of the infant falls ill, alternative provisions would be made to take care of the infant.</p><p align="justify">Stressing on education facilities for children lodged along with mothers, the court said if such facilities were not available, then the inmate would be shifted to the nearest prison where she and her children could avail of them, it had said.</p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 22062, 'title' => 'Are you taking care of pregnant inmates, top court asks states -Dhananjay Mahapatra', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> <em>NEW DELHI: </em>Are you taking proper care of pregnant inmates and ensuring that the children born to women prisoners do not grow up in the shadow of criminals? the Supreme Court asked the states and ordered inspection of their prisons. </p> <p align="justify"> A bench of Chief Justice P Sathasivam and Justices Ranjana Desai and Ranjan Gogoi on Thursday ordered, &quot;We direct all the State Legal Services Authorities to inspect all jails including sub-jails in their states, take note of the prevailing situations in terms of the various directions issued in court's order dated April 13, 2006, and submit a detailed report to this court within a period of eight weeks from today.&quot; </p> <p align="justify"> Amicus curiae - senior advocate Ranjit Kumar and lawyer Binu Tamta - brought to the SC's notice that though the court had in 2006 ordered the states to take salutary steps to make pregnant inmates lives a little comfortable within the four walls of the jails and to prevent criminality cast shadow on the children born in prisons, there had been no information supplied to the court since 2007. </p> <p align="justify"> The April 13 order seven years ago was passed by the SC in response to a PIL filed by R D Upadhyay complaining that governments were not bothered about scars of incarceration on little children lodged in jails along with their mothers or been concerned about the needs of pregnant women put behind bars. </p> <p align="justify"> The court ordered the Centre and states to provide within three months cradles, creche, daycare centres and woman doctors in prisons to take care of pregnant inmates and dependent children lodged along with mothers in jails across the country. </p> <p align="justify"> As per 2006 figures, the number of women inmates, including convicts and undertrials, in the country was around 10,000. Nearly 1,000 children were also incarcerated along with their mothers. Their only fault was they were dependent on their mothers. The court had issued a series of guidelines in an attempt to improve the living conditions of these children, who were victims of circumstances. </p> <p align="justify"> Children lodged in prisons because they are dependent on their mothers, who are behind bars, won't treated as undertrials, the SC had said trying to erase the prisoner tag from the young ones. </p> <p align="justify"> It had ordered that those born to women inmates would be given a 'clean' birth certificate. The infant's place of birth would not be shown as prison, it would preferably be noted as 'home', the court had said. </p> <p align="justify"> The court had understood the need of the child to be with its mother till the age of six and allowed women prisoners to keep their wards with them till they attained the specified age. </p> <p align="justify"> The infants would have provision for nurseries and other facilities required for their protection inside prison and mother and child would get adequate and regular medical attention from a 'lady doctor', it had ordered. </p> <p align="justify"> Covering the finer points relating to proper development of a child and to avoid the scars of prison casting a shadow on their future life, the court had ordered jail authorities to provide proper facilities for their education and recreation. </p> <p align="justify"> The children and the mothers with new-born would be provided with nutrients and proper diet, including fruits and milk etc, it said. When the mother of the infant falls ill, alternative provisions would be made to take care of the infant. </p> <p align="justify"> Stressing on education facilities for children lodged along with mothers, the court said if such facilities were not available, then the inmate would be shifted to the nearest prison where she and her children could avail of them, it had said. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 4 August, 2013, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Are-you-taking-care-of-pregnant-inmates-top-court-asks-states/articleshow/21586521.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'are-you-taking-care-of-pregnant-inmates-top-court-asks-states-dhananjay-mahapatra-22210', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 22210, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 22062 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Are you taking care of pregnant inmates, top court asks states -Dhananjay Mahapatra' $metaKeywords = 'Human Rights,Law and Justice,Gender Equality,Gender' $metaDesc = ' -The Times of India NEW DELHI: Are you taking proper care of pregnant inmates and ensuring that the children born to women prisoners do not grow up in the shadow of criminals? the Supreme Court asked the states and ordered inspection...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>Are you taking proper care of pregnant inmates and ensuring that the children born to women prisoners do not grow up in the shadow of criminals? the Supreme Court asked the states and ordered inspection of their prisons.</p><p align="justify">A bench of Chief Justice P Sathasivam and Justices Ranjana Desai and Ranjan Gogoi on Thursday ordered, &quot;We direct all the State Legal Services Authorities to inspect all jails including sub-jails in their states, take note of the prevailing situations in terms of the various directions issued in court's order dated April 13, 2006, and submit a detailed report to this court within a period of eight weeks from today.&quot;</p><p align="justify">Amicus curiae - senior advocate Ranjit Kumar and lawyer Binu Tamta - brought to the SC's notice that though the court had in 2006 ordered the states to take salutary steps to make pregnant inmates lives a little comfortable within the four walls of the jails and to prevent criminality cast shadow on the children born in prisons, there had been no information supplied to the court since 2007.</p><p align="justify">The April 13 order seven years ago was passed by the SC in response to a PIL filed by R D Upadhyay complaining that governments were not bothered about scars of incarceration on little children lodged in jails along with their mothers or been concerned about the needs of pregnant women put behind bars.</p><p align="justify">The court ordered the Centre and states to provide within three months cradles, creche, daycare centres and woman doctors in prisons to take care of pregnant inmates and dependent children lodged along with mothers in jails across the country.</p><p align="justify">As per 2006 figures, the number of women inmates, including convicts and undertrials, in the country was around 10,000. Nearly 1,000 children were also incarcerated along with their mothers. Their only fault was they were dependent on their mothers. The court had issued a series of guidelines in an attempt to improve the living conditions of these children, who were victims of circumstances.</p><p align="justify">Children lodged in prisons because they are dependent on their mothers, who are behind bars, won't treated as undertrials, the SC had said trying to erase the prisoner tag from the young ones.</p><p align="justify">It had ordered that those born to women inmates would be given a 'clean' birth certificate. The infant's place of birth would not be shown as prison, it would preferably be noted as 'home', the court had said.</p><p align="justify">The court had understood the need of the child to be with its mother till the age of six and allowed women prisoners to keep their wards with them till they attained the specified age.</p><p align="justify">The infants would have provision for nurseries and other facilities required for their protection inside prison and mother and child would get adequate and regular medical attention from a 'lady doctor', it had ordered.</p><p align="justify">Covering the finer points relating to proper development of a child and to avoid the scars of prison casting a shadow on their future life, the court had ordered jail authorities to provide proper facilities for their education and recreation.</p><p align="justify">The children and the mothers with new-born would be provided with nutrients and proper diet, including fruits and milk etc, it said. When the mother of the infant falls ill, alternative provisions would be made to take care of the infant.</p><p align="justify">Stressing on education facilities for children lodged along with mothers, the court said if such facilities were not available, then the inmate would be shifted to the nearest prison where she and her children could avail of them, it had said.</p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/are-you-taking-care-of-pregnant-inmates-top-court-asks-states-dhananjay-mahapatra-22210.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Are you taking care of pregnant inmates, top court asks states -Dhananjay Mahapatra | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Times of India NEW DELHI: Are you taking proper care of pregnant inmates and ensuring that the children born to women prisoners do not grow up in the shadow of criminals? the Supreme Court asked the states and ordered inspection..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Are you taking care of pregnant inmates, top court asks states -Dhananjay Mahapatra</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>Are you taking proper care of pregnant inmates and ensuring that the children born to women prisoners do not grow up in the shadow of criminals? the Supreme Court asked the states and ordered inspection of their prisons.</p><p align="justify">A bench of Chief Justice P Sathasivam and Justices Ranjana Desai and Ranjan Gogoi on Thursday ordered, "We direct all the State Legal Services Authorities to inspect all jails including sub-jails in their states, take note of the prevailing situations in terms of the various directions issued in court's order dated April 13, 2006, and submit a detailed report to this court within a period of eight weeks from today."</p><p align="justify">Amicus curiae - senior advocate Ranjit Kumar and lawyer Binu Tamta - brought to the SC's notice that though the court had in 2006 ordered the states to take salutary steps to make pregnant inmates lives a little comfortable within the four walls of the jails and to prevent criminality cast shadow on the children born in prisons, there had been no information supplied to the court since 2007.</p><p align="justify">The April 13 order seven years ago was passed by the SC in response to a PIL filed by R D Upadhyay complaining that governments were not bothered about scars of incarceration on little children lodged in jails along with their mothers or been concerned about the needs of pregnant women put behind bars.</p><p align="justify">The court ordered the Centre and states to provide within three months cradles, creche, daycare centres and woman doctors in prisons to take care of pregnant inmates and dependent children lodged along with mothers in jails across the country.</p><p align="justify">As per 2006 figures, the number of women inmates, including convicts and undertrials, in the country was around 10,000. Nearly 1,000 children were also incarcerated along with their mothers. Their only fault was they were dependent on their mothers. The court had issued a series of guidelines in an attempt to improve the living conditions of these children, who were victims of circumstances.</p><p align="justify">Children lodged in prisons because they are dependent on their mothers, who are behind bars, won't treated as undertrials, the SC had said trying to erase the prisoner tag from the young ones.</p><p align="justify">It had ordered that those born to women inmates would be given a 'clean' birth certificate. The infant's place of birth would not be shown as prison, it would preferably be noted as 'home', the court had said.</p><p align="justify">The court had understood the need of the child to be with its mother till the age of six and allowed women prisoners to keep their wards with them till they attained the specified age.</p><p align="justify">The infants would have provision for nurseries and other facilities required for their protection inside prison and mother and child would get adequate and regular medical attention from a 'lady doctor', it had ordered.</p><p align="justify">Covering the finer points relating to proper development of a child and to avoid the scars of prison casting a shadow on their future life, the court had ordered jail authorities to provide proper facilities for their education and recreation.</p><p align="justify">The children and the mothers with new-born would be provided with nutrients and proper diet, including fruits and milk etc, it said. When the mother of the infant falls ill, alternative provisions would be made to take care of the infant.</p><p align="justify">Stressing on education facilities for children lodged along with mothers, the court said if such facilities were not available, then the inmate would be shifted to the nearest prison where she and her children could avail of them, it had said.</p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 22062, 'title' => 'Are you taking care of pregnant inmates, top court asks states -Dhananjay Mahapatra', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> <em>NEW DELHI: </em>Are you taking proper care of pregnant inmates and ensuring that the children born to women prisoners do not grow up in the shadow of criminals? the Supreme Court asked the states and ordered inspection of their prisons. </p> <p align="justify"> A bench of Chief Justice P Sathasivam and Justices Ranjana Desai and Ranjan Gogoi on Thursday ordered, "We direct all the State Legal Services Authorities to inspect all jails including sub-jails in their states, take note of the prevailing situations in terms of the various directions issued in court's order dated April 13, 2006, and submit a detailed report to this court within a period of eight weeks from today." </p> <p align="justify"> Amicus curiae - senior advocate Ranjit Kumar and lawyer Binu Tamta - brought to the SC's notice that though the court had in 2006 ordered the states to take salutary steps to make pregnant inmates lives a little comfortable within the four walls of the jails and to prevent criminality cast shadow on the children born in prisons, there had been no information supplied to the court since 2007. </p> <p align="justify"> The April 13 order seven years ago was passed by the SC in response to a PIL filed by R D Upadhyay complaining that governments were not bothered about scars of incarceration on little children lodged in jails along with their mothers or been concerned about the needs of pregnant women put behind bars. </p> <p align="justify"> The court ordered the Centre and states to provide within three months cradles, creche, daycare centres and woman doctors in prisons to take care of pregnant inmates and dependent children lodged along with mothers in jails across the country. </p> <p align="justify"> As per 2006 figures, the number of women inmates, including convicts and undertrials, in the country was around 10,000. Nearly 1,000 children were also incarcerated along with their mothers. Their only fault was they were dependent on their mothers. The court had issued a series of guidelines in an attempt to improve the living conditions of these children, who were victims of circumstances. </p> <p align="justify"> Children lodged in prisons because they are dependent on their mothers, who are behind bars, won't treated as undertrials, the SC had said trying to erase the prisoner tag from the young ones. </p> <p align="justify"> It had ordered that those born to women inmates would be given a 'clean' birth certificate. The infant's place of birth would not be shown as prison, it would preferably be noted as 'home', the court had said. </p> <p align="justify"> The court had understood the need of the child to be with its mother till the age of six and allowed women prisoners to keep their wards with them till they attained the specified age. </p> <p align="justify"> The infants would have provision for nurseries and other facilities required for their protection inside prison and mother and child would get adequate and regular medical attention from a 'lady doctor', it had ordered. </p> <p align="justify"> Covering the finer points relating to proper development of a child and to avoid the scars of prison casting a shadow on their future life, the court had ordered jail authorities to provide proper facilities for their education and recreation. </p> <p align="justify"> The children and the mothers with new-born would be provided with nutrients and proper diet, including fruits and milk etc, it said. When the mother of the infant falls ill, alternative provisions would be made to take care of the infant. </p> <p align="justify"> Stressing on education facilities for children lodged along with mothers, the court said if such facilities were not available, then the inmate would be shifted to the nearest prison where she and her children could avail of them, it had said. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 4 August, 2013, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Are-you-taking-care-of-pregnant-inmates-top-court-asks-states/articleshow/21586521.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'are-you-taking-care-of-pregnant-inmates-top-court-asks-states-dhananjay-mahapatra-22210', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 22210, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 22062, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Are you taking care of pregnant inmates, top court asks states -Dhananjay Mahapatra', 'metaKeywords' => 'Human Rights,Law and Justice,Gender Equality,Gender', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Times of India NEW DELHI: Are you taking proper care of pregnant inmates and ensuring that the children born to women prisoners do not grow up in the shadow of criminals? the Supreme Court asked the states and ordered inspection...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>Are you taking proper care of pregnant inmates and ensuring that the children born to women prisoners do not grow up in the shadow of criminals? the Supreme Court asked the states and ordered inspection of their prisons.</p><p align="justify">A bench of Chief Justice P Sathasivam and Justices Ranjana Desai and Ranjan Gogoi on Thursday ordered, "We direct all the State Legal Services Authorities to inspect all jails including sub-jails in their states, take note of the prevailing situations in terms of the various directions issued in court's order dated April 13, 2006, and submit a detailed report to this court within a period of eight weeks from today."</p><p align="justify">Amicus curiae - senior advocate Ranjit Kumar and lawyer Binu Tamta - brought to the SC's notice that though the court had in 2006 ordered the states to take salutary steps to make pregnant inmates lives a little comfortable within the four walls of the jails and to prevent criminality cast shadow on the children born in prisons, there had been no information supplied to the court since 2007.</p><p align="justify">The April 13 order seven years ago was passed by the SC in response to a PIL filed by R D Upadhyay complaining that governments were not bothered about scars of incarceration on little children lodged in jails along with their mothers or been concerned about the needs of pregnant women put behind bars.</p><p align="justify">The court ordered the Centre and states to provide within three months cradles, creche, daycare centres and woman doctors in prisons to take care of pregnant inmates and dependent children lodged along with mothers in jails across the country.</p><p align="justify">As per 2006 figures, the number of women inmates, including convicts and undertrials, in the country was around 10,000. Nearly 1,000 children were also incarcerated along with their mothers. Their only fault was they were dependent on their mothers. The court had issued a series of guidelines in an attempt to improve the living conditions of these children, who were victims of circumstances.</p><p align="justify">Children lodged in prisons because they are dependent on their mothers, who are behind bars, won't treated as undertrials, the SC had said trying to erase the prisoner tag from the young ones.</p><p align="justify">It had ordered that those born to women inmates would be given a 'clean' birth certificate. The infant's place of birth would not be shown as prison, it would preferably be noted as 'home', the court had said.</p><p align="justify">The court had understood the need of the child to be with its mother till the age of six and allowed women prisoners to keep their wards with them till they attained the specified age.</p><p align="justify">The infants would have provision for nurseries and other facilities required for their protection inside prison and mother and child would get adequate and regular medical attention from a 'lady doctor', it had ordered.</p><p align="justify">Covering the finer points relating to proper development of a child and to avoid the scars of prison casting a shadow on their future life, the court had ordered jail authorities to provide proper facilities for their education and recreation.</p><p align="justify">The children and the mothers with new-born would be provided with nutrients and proper diet, including fruits and milk etc, it said. When the mother of the infant falls ill, alternative provisions would be made to take care of the infant.</p><p align="justify">Stressing on education facilities for children lodged along with mothers, the court said if such facilities were not available, then the inmate would be shifted to the nearest prison where she and her children could avail of them, it had said.</p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 22062, 'title' => 'Are you taking care of pregnant inmates, top court asks states -Dhananjay Mahapatra', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India </div> <p align="justify"> <br /> <em>NEW DELHI: </em>Are you taking proper care of pregnant inmates and ensuring that the children born to women prisoners do not grow up in the shadow of criminals? the Supreme Court asked the states and ordered inspection of their prisons. </p> <p align="justify"> A bench of Chief Justice P Sathasivam and Justices Ranjana Desai and Ranjan Gogoi on Thursday ordered, "We direct all the State Legal Services Authorities to inspect all jails including sub-jails in their states, take note of the prevailing situations in terms of the various directions issued in court's order dated April 13, 2006, and submit a detailed report to this court within a period of eight weeks from today." </p> <p align="justify"> Amicus curiae - senior advocate Ranjit Kumar and lawyer Binu Tamta - brought to the SC's notice that though the court had in 2006 ordered the states to take salutary steps to make pregnant inmates lives a little comfortable within the four walls of the jails and to prevent criminality cast shadow on the children born in prisons, there had been no information supplied to the court since 2007. </p> <p align="justify"> The April 13 order seven years ago was passed by the SC in response to a PIL filed by R D Upadhyay complaining that governments were not bothered about scars of incarceration on little children lodged in jails along with their mothers or been concerned about the needs of pregnant women put behind bars. </p> <p align="justify"> The court ordered the Centre and states to provide within three months cradles, creche, daycare centres and woman doctors in prisons to take care of pregnant inmates and dependent children lodged along with mothers in jails across the country. </p> <p align="justify"> As per 2006 figures, the number of women inmates, including convicts and undertrials, in the country was around 10,000. Nearly 1,000 children were also incarcerated along with their mothers. Their only fault was they were dependent on their mothers. The court had issued a series of guidelines in an attempt to improve the living conditions of these children, who were victims of circumstances. </p> <p align="justify"> Children lodged in prisons because they are dependent on their mothers, who are behind bars, won't treated as undertrials, the SC had said trying to erase the prisoner tag from the young ones. </p> <p align="justify"> It had ordered that those born to women inmates would be given a 'clean' birth certificate. The infant's place of birth would not be shown as prison, it would preferably be noted as 'home', the court had said. </p> <p align="justify"> The court had understood the need of the child to be with its mother till the age of six and allowed women prisoners to keep their wards with them till they attained the specified age. </p> <p align="justify"> The infants would have provision for nurseries and other facilities required for their protection inside prison and mother and child would get adequate and regular medical attention from a 'lady doctor', it had ordered. </p> <p align="justify"> Covering the finer points relating to proper development of a child and to avoid the scars of prison casting a shadow on their future life, the court had ordered jail authorities to provide proper facilities for their education and recreation. </p> <p align="justify"> The children and the mothers with new-born would be provided with nutrients and proper diet, including fruits and milk etc, it said. When the mother of the infant falls ill, alternative provisions would be made to take care of the infant. </p> <p align="justify"> Stressing on education facilities for children lodged along with mothers, the court said if such facilities were not available, then the inmate would be shifted to the nearest prison where she and her children could avail of them, it had said. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 4 August, 2013, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Are-you-taking-care-of-pregnant-inmates-top-court-asks-states/articleshow/21586521.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'are-you-taking-care-of-pregnant-inmates-top-court-asks-states-dhananjay-mahapatra-22210', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 22210, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 22062 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Are you taking care of pregnant inmates, top court asks states -Dhananjay Mahapatra' $metaKeywords = 'Human Rights,Law and Justice,Gender Equality,Gender' $metaDesc = ' -The Times of India NEW DELHI: Are you taking proper care of pregnant inmates and ensuring that the children born to women prisoners do not grow up in the shadow of criminals? the Supreme Court asked the states and ordered inspection...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>Are you taking proper care of pregnant inmates and ensuring that the children born to women prisoners do not grow up in the shadow of criminals? the Supreme Court asked the states and ordered inspection of their prisons.</p><p align="justify">A bench of Chief Justice P Sathasivam and Justices Ranjana Desai and Ranjan Gogoi on Thursday ordered, "We direct all the State Legal Services Authorities to inspect all jails including sub-jails in their states, take note of the prevailing situations in terms of the various directions issued in court's order dated April 13, 2006, and submit a detailed report to this court within a period of eight weeks from today."</p><p align="justify">Amicus curiae - senior advocate Ranjit Kumar and lawyer Binu Tamta - brought to the SC's notice that though the court had in 2006 ordered the states to take salutary steps to make pregnant inmates lives a little comfortable within the four walls of the jails and to prevent criminality cast shadow on the children born in prisons, there had been no information supplied to the court since 2007.</p><p align="justify">The April 13 order seven years ago was passed by the SC in response to a PIL filed by R D Upadhyay complaining that governments were not bothered about scars of incarceration on little children lodged in jails along with their mothers or been concerned about the needs of pregnant women put behind bars.</p><p align="justify">The court ordered the Centre and states to provide within three months cradles, creche, daycare centres and woman doctors in prisons to take care of pregnant inmates and dependent children lodged along with mothers in jails across the country.</p><p align="justify">As per 2006 figures, the number of women inmates, including convicts and undertrials, in the country was around 10,000. Nearly 1,000 children were also incarcerated along with their mothers. Their only fault was they were dependent on their mothers. The court had issued a series of guidelines in an attempt to improve the living conditions of these children, who were victims of circumstances.</p><p align="justify">Children lodged in prisons because they are dependent on their mothers, who are behind bars, won't treated as undertrials, the SC had said trying to erase the prisoner tag from the young ones.</p><p align="justify">It had ordered that those born to women inmates would be given a 'clean' birth certificate. The infant's place of birth would not be shown as prison, it would preferably be noted as 'home', the court had said.</p><p align="justify">The court had understood the need of the child to be with its mother till the age of six and allowed women prisoners to keep their wards with them till they attained the specified age.</p><p align="justify">The infants would have provision for nurseries and other facilities required for their protection inside prison and mother and child would get adequate and regular medical attention from a 'lady doctor', it had ordered.</p><p align="justify">Covering the finer points relating to proper development of a child and to avoid the scars of prison casting a shadow on their future life, the court had ordered jail authorities to provide proper facilities for their education and recreation.</p><p align="justify">The children and the mothers with new-born would be provided with nutrients and proper diet, including fruits and milk etc, it said. When the mother of the infant falls ill, alternative provisions would be made to take care of the infant.</p><p align="justify">Stressing on education facilities for children lodged along with mothers, the court said if such facilities were not available, then the inmate would be shifted to the nearest prison where she and her children could avail of them, it had said.</p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Are you taking care of pregnant inmates, top court asks states -Dhananjay Mahapatra |
-The Times of India
A bench of Chief Justice P Sathasivam and Justices Ranjana Desai and Ranjan Gogoi on Thursday ordered, "We direct all the State Legal Services Authorities to inspect all jails including sub-jails in their states, take note of the prevailing situations in terms of the various directions issued in court's order dated April 13, 2006, and submit a detailed report to this court within a period of eight weeks from today." Amicus curiae - senior advocate Ranjit Kumar and lawyer Binu Tamta - brought to the SC's notice that though the court had in 2006 ordered the states to take salutary steps to make pregnant inmates lives a little comfortable within the four walls of the jails and to prevent criminality cast shadow on the children born in prisons, there had been no information supplied to the court since 2007. The April 13 order seven years ago was passed by the SC in response to a PIL filed by R D Upadhyay complaining that governments were not bothered about scars of incarceration on little children lodged in jails along with their mothers or been concerned about the needs of pregnant women put behind bars. The court ordered the Centre and states to provide within three months cradles, creche, daycare centres and woman doctors in prisons to take care of pregnant inmates and dependent children lodged along with mothers in jails across the country. As per 2006 figures, the number of women inmates, including convicts and undertrials, in the country was around 10,000. Nearly 1,000 children were also incarcerated along with their mothers. Their only fault was they were dependent on their mothers. The court had issued a series of guidelines in an attempt to improve the living conditions of these children, who were victims of circumstances. Children lodged in prisons because they are dependent on their mothers, who are behind bars, won't treated as undertrials, the SC had said trying to erase the prisoner tag from the young ones. It had ordered that those born to women inmates would be given a 'clean' birth certificate. The infant's place of birth would not be shown as prison, it would preferably be noted as 'home', the court had said. The court had understood the need of the child to be with its mother till the age of six and allowed women prisoners to keep their wards with them till they attained the specified age. The infants would have provision for nurseries and other facilities required for their protection inside prison and mother and child would get adequate and regular medical attention from a 'lady doctor', it had ordered. Covering the finer points relating to proper development of a child and to avoid the scars of prison casting a shadow on their future life, the court had ordered jail authorities to provide proper facilities for their education and recreation. The children and the mothers with new-born would be provided with nutrients and proper diet, including fruits and milk etc, it said. When the mother of the infant falls ill, alternative provisions would be made to take care of the infant. Stressing on education facilities for children lodged along with mothers, the court said if such facilities were not available, then the inmate would be shifted to the nearest prison where she and her children could avail of them, it had said. |