Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/army-of-jobseekers-now-11cr-strong-subodh-varma-4674052/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/army-of-jobseekers-now-11cr-strong-subodh-varma-4674052/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/army-of-jobseekers-now-11cr-strong-subodh-varma-4674052/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/army-of-jobseekers-now-11cr-strong-subodh-varma-4674052/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68182181cd56c-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68182181cd56c-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68182181cd56c-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68182181cd56c-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68182181cd56c-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68182181cd56c-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68182181cd56c-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68182181cd56c-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68182181cd56c-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 26014, 'title' => 'Army of jobseekers now 11cr-strong -Subodh Varma', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India </div> <p align="justify"> Over 113 million persons were &quot;seeking or available for work&quot;, that is, they were unemployed, according to Census 2011 data released today. This huge number made up around 15% of the working age population of about 748 million persons in the 15 to 60 years age group. These unemployed persons were distributed over nearly 70 million families or households. That's about 28% of all households in the country. </p> <p align="justify"> By categorizing persons as &quot;seeking or available for work&quot; Census has differentiated them from those who are not in the job market, which includes housewives, students, and others. </p> <p align="justify"> This appears to be an all-time high for Census years. In 2001, about 23% of households had members that were unemployed. Within a decade, this had risen to 28%. In the past three years, no particular spurt in employment growth or policies that would catalyse job creation have emerged and the situation continues to be dire. </p> <p align="justify"> These exceptionally high unemployment levels are likely to have contributed to the severe loss the UPA suffered in the 2014 elections. Many pre-election opinion polls had underlined that unemployment was a key issue with voters. These stark figures would also be a wake-up call for the new Modi sarkar. </p> <p align="justify"> As reported previously by TOI, over 20% of youth between 15 to 24 years of age were jobless and seeking work according to Census 2011 data released earlier. In absolute terms, this army of unemployed youth is about 47 million. </p> <p align="justify"> The number of unemployed persons is actually more than 113 million because the Census office has released data in terms of how many persons per household are seeking or available for work, and the highest number in that is &quot;more than 4&quot;. For the purpose of the present computation, this has been taken as four persons only. </p> <p align="justify"> There has been a distinct shift in the employment pattern since 2001. In most states, and nationally, the employment situation is relatively better in urban areas than in rural areas. Nationally, 23% of urban households reported that they had at least one member unemployed while in rural areas this share went up to 30%. In 2001, the rural-urban difference was not so much. The reason behind this appears to be the deep agricultural crisis. </p> <p align="justify"> Statewise unemployment figures reveal that while most states have approximately the same proportion of households with some member unemployed as the national average, some states have much higher rates. These include Jammu &amp; Kashmir with about 48% households having unemployed persons, Bihar (35%), Assam (38%), West Bengal (54%), Jharkhand (42%), Odisha (39%) and Kerala (42%). </p> <p align="justify"> At the other end, Maharashtra (14%), Gujarat (12%), Andhra Pradesh (18%) Karnataka (14%) and Tamil Nadu (18%) all seem to be doing much better than other states in providing jobs. These are states with high degrees of industrialization and of urbanization. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 24 September, 2014, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Army-of-jobseekers-now-11cr-strong/articleshow/43266422.cms?', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'army-of-jobseekers-now-11cr-strong-subodh-varma-4674052', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4674052, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 26014, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Army of jobseekers now 11cr-strong -Subodh Varma', 'metaKeywords' => 'Census 2011,Employment,youth,Unemployment', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Times of India Over 113 million persons were &quot;seeking or available for work&quot;, that is, they were unemployed, according to Census 2011 data released today. This huge number made up around 15% of the working age population of about 748...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify">Over 113 million persons were &quot;seeking or available for work&quot;, that is, they were unemployed, according to Census 2011 data released today. This huge number made up around 15% of the working age population of about 748 million persons in the 15 to 60 years age group. These unemployed persons were distributed over nearly 70 million families or households. That's about 28% of all households in the country.</p><p align="justify">By categorizing persons as &quot;seeking or available for work&quot; Census has differentiated them from those who are not in the job market, which includes housewives, students, and others.</p><p align="justify">This appears to be an all-time high for Census years. In 2001, about 23% of households had members that were unemployed. Within a decade, this had risen to 28%. In the past three years, no particular spurt in employment growth or policies that would catalyse job creation have emerged and the situation continues to be dire.</p><p align="justify">These exceptionally high unemployment levels are likely to have contributed to the severe loss the UPA suffered in the 2014 elections. Many pre-election opinion polls had underlined that unemployment was a key issue with voters. These stark figures would also be a wake-up call for the new Modi sarkar.</p><p align="justify">As reported previously by TOI, over 20% of youth between 15 to 24 years of age were jobless and seeking work according to Census 2011 data released earlier. In absolute terms, this army of unemployed youth is about 47 million.</p><p align="justify">The number of unemployed persons is actually more than 113 million because the Census office has released data in terms of how many persons per household are seeking or available for work, and the highest number in that is &quot;more than 4&quot;. For the purpose of the present computation, this has been taken as four persons only.</p><p align="justify">There has been a distinct shift in the employment pattern since 2001. In most states, and nationally, the employment situation is relatively better in urban areas than in rural areas. Nationally, 23% of urban households reported that they had at least one member unemployed while in rural areas this share went up to 30%. In 2001, the rural-urban difference was not so much. The reason behind this appears to be the deep agricultural crisis.</p><p align="justify">Statewise unemployment figures reveal that while most states have approximately the same proportion of households with some member unemployed as the national average, some states have much higher rates. These include Jammu &amp; Kashmir with about 48% households having unemployed persons, Bihar (35%), Assam (38%), West Bengal (54%), Jharkhand (42%), Odisha (39%) and Kerala (42%).</p><p align="justify">At the other end, Maharashtra (14%), Gujarat (12%), Andhra Pradesh (18%) Karnataka (14%) and Tamil Nadu (18%) all seem to be doing much better than other states in providing jobs. These are states with high degrees of industrialization and of urbanization. </p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 26014, 'title' => 'Army of jobseekers now 11cr-strong -Subodh Varma', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India </div> <p align="justify"> Over 113 million persons were &quot;seeking or available for work&quot;, that is, they were unemployed, according to Census 2011 data released today. This huge number made up around 15% of the working age population of about 748 million persons in the 15 to 60 years age group. These unemployed persons were distributed over nearly 70 million families or households. That's about 28% of all households in the country. </p> <p align="justify"> By categorizing persons as &quot;seeking or available for work&quot; Census has differentiated them from those who are not in the job market, which includes housewives, students, and others. </p> <p align="justify"> This appears to be an all-time high for Census years. In 2001, about 23% of households had members that were unemployed. Within a decade, this had risen to 28%. In the past three years, no particular spurt in employment growth or policies that would catalyse job creation have emerged and the situation continues to be dire. </p> <p align="justify"> These exceptionally high unemployment levels are likely to have contributed to the severe loss the UPA suffered in the 2014 elections. Many pre-election opinion polls had underlined that unemployment was a key issue with voters. These stark figures would also be a wake-up call for the new Modi sarkar. </p> <p align="justify"> As reported previously by TOI, over 20% of youth between 15 to 24 years of age were jobless and seeking work according to Census 2011 data released earlier. In absolute terms, this army of unemployed youth is about 47 million. </p> <p align="justify"> The number of unemployed persons is actually more than 113 million because the Census office has released data in terms of how many persons per household are seeking or available for work, and the highest number in that is &quot;more than 4&quot;. For the purpose of the present computation, this has been taken as four persons only. </p> <p align="justify"> There has been a distinct shift in the employment pattern since 2001. In most states, and nationally, the employment situation is relatively better in urban areas than in rural areas. Nationally, 23% of urban households reported that they had at least one member unemployed while in rural areas this share went up to 30%. In 2001, the rural-urban difference was not so much. The reason behind this appears to be the deep agricultural crisis. </p> <p align="justify"> Statewise unemployment figures reveal that while most states have approximately the same proportion of households with some member unemployed as the national average, some states have much higher rates. These include Jammu &amp; Kashmir with about 48% households having unemployed persons, Bihar (35%), Assam (38%), West Bengal (54%), Jharkhand (42%), Odisha (39%) and Kerala (42%). </p> <p align="justify"> At the other end, Maharashtra (14%), Gujarat (12%), Andhra Pradesh (18%) Karnataka (14%) and Tamil Nadu (18%) all seem to be doing much better than other states in providing jobs. These are states with high degrees of industrialization and of urbanization. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 24 September, 2014, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Army-of-jobseekers-now-11cr-strong/articleshow/43266422.cms?', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'army-of-jobseekers-now-11cr-strong-subodh-varma-4674052', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4674052, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 26014 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Army of jobseekers now 11cr-strong -Subodh Varma' $metaKeywords = 'Census 2011,Employment,youth,Unemployment' $metaDesc = ' -The Times of India Over 113 million persons were &quot;seeking or available for work&quot;, that is, they were unemployed, according to Census 2011 data released today. This huge number made up around 15% of the working age population of about 748...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify">Over 113 million persons were &quot;seeking or available for work&quot;, that is, they were unemployed, according to Census 2011 data released today. This huge number made up around 15% of the working age population of about 748 million persons in the 15 to 60 years age group. These unemployed persons were distributed over nearly 70 million families or households. That's about 28% of all households in the country.</p><p align="justify">By categorizing persons as &quot;seeking or available for work&quot; Census has differentiated them from those who are not in the job market, which includes housewives, students, and others.</p><p align="justify">This appears to be an all-time high for Census years. In 2001, about 23% of households had members that were unemployed. Within a decade, this had risen to 28%. In the past three years, no particular spurt in employment growth or policies that would catalyse job creation have emerged and the situation continues to be dire.</p><p align="justify">These exceptionally high unemployment levels are likely to have contributed to the severe loss the UPA suffered in the 2014 elections. Many pre-election opinion polls had underlined that unemployment was a key issue with voters. These stark figures would also be a wake-up call for the new Modi sarkar.</p><p align="justify">As reported previously by TOI, over 20% of youth between 15 to 24 years of age were jobless and seeking work according to Census 2011 data released earlier. In absolute terms, this army of unemployed youth is about 47 million.</p><p align="justify">The number of unemployed persons is actually more than 113 million because the Census office has released data in terms of how many persons per household are seeking or available for work, and the highest number in that is &quot;more than 4&quot;. For the purpose of the present computation, this has been taken as four persons only.</p><p align="justify">There has been a distinct shift in the employment pattern since 2001. In most states, and nationally, the employment situation is relatively better in urban areas than in rural areas. Nationally, 23% of urban households reported that they had at least one member unemployed while in rural areas this share went up to 30%. In 2001, the rural-urban difference was not so much. The reason behind this appears to be the deep agricultural crisis.</p><p align="justify">Statewise unemployment figures reveal that while most states have approximately the same proportion of households with some member unemployed as the national average, some states have much higher rates. These include Jammu &amp; Kashmir with about 48% households having unemployed persons, Bihar (35%), Assam (38%), West Bengal (54%), Jharkhand (42%), Odisha (39%) and Kerala (42%).</p><p align="justify">At the other end, Maharashtra (14%), Gujarat (12%), Andhra Pradesh (18%) Karnataka (14%) and Tamil Nadu (18%) all seem to be doing much better than other states in providing jobs. These are states with high degrees of industrialization and of urbanization. </p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/army-of-jobseekers-now-11cr-strong-subodh-varma-4674052.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Army of jobseekers now 11cr-strong -Subodh Varma | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Times of India Over 113 million persons were "seeking or available for work", that is, they were unemployed, according to Census 2011 data released today. This huge number made up around 15% of the working age population of about 748..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Army of jobseekers now 11cr-strong -Subodh Varma</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify">Over 113 million persons were "seeking or available for work", that is, they were unemployed, according to Census 2011 data released today. This huge number made up around 15% of the working age population of about 748 million persons in the 15 to 60 years age group. These unemployed persons were distributed over nearly 70 million families or households. That's about 28% of all households in the country.</p><p align="justify">By categorizing persons as "seeking or available for work" Census has differentiated them from those who are not in the job market, which includes housewives, students, and others.</p><p align="justify">This appears to be an all-time high for Census years. In 2001, about 23% of households had members that were unemployed. Within a decade, this had risen to 28%. In the past three years, no particular spurt in employment growth or policies that would catalyse job creation have emerged and the situation continues to be dire.</p><p align="justify">These exceptionally high unemployment levels are likely to have contributed to the severe loss the UPA suffered in the 2014 elections. Many pre-election opinion polls had underlined that unemployment was a key issue with voters. These stark figures would also be a wake-up call for the new Modi sarkar.</p><p align="justify">As reported previously by TOI, over 20% of youth between 15 to 24 years of age were jobless and seeking work according to Census 2011 data released earlier. In absolute terms, this army of unemployed youth is about 47 million.</p><p align="justify">The number of unemployed persons is actually more than 113 million because the Census office has released data in terms of how many persons per household are seeking or available for work, and the highest number in that is "more than 4". For the purpose of the present computation, this has been taken as four persons only.</p><p align="justify">There has been a distinct shift in the employment pattern since 2001. In most states, and nationally, the employment situation is relatively better in urban areas than in rural areas. Nationally, 23% of urban households reported that they had at least one member unemployed while in rural areas this share went up to 30%. In 2001, the rural-urban difference was not so much. The reason behind this appears to be the deep agricultural crisis.</p><p align="justify">Statewise unemployment figures reveal that while most states have approximately the same proportion of households with some member unemployed as the national average, some states have much higher rates. These include Jammu & Kashmir with about 48% households having unemployed persons, Bihar (35%), Assam (38%), West Bengal (54%), Jharkhand (42%), Odisha (39%) and Kerala (42%).</p><p align="justify">At the other end, Maharashtra (14%), Gujarat (12%), Andhra Pradesh (18%) Karnataka (14%) and Tamil Nadu (18%) all seem to be doing much better than other states in providing jobs. These are states with high degrees of industrialization and of urbanization. </p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68182181cd56c-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68182181cd56c-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68182181cd56c-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68182181cd56c-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68182181cd56c-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68182181cd56c-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68182181cd56c-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68182181cd56c-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68182181cd56c-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 26014, 'title' => 'Army of jobseekers now 11cr-strong -Subodh Varma', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India </div> <p align="justify"> Over 113 million persons were &quot;seeking or available for work&quot;, that is, they were unemployed, according to Census 2011 data released today. This huge number made up around 15% of the working age population of about 748 million persons in the 15 to 60 years age group. These unemployed persons were distributed over nearly 70 million families or households. That's about 28% of all households in the country. </p> <p align="justify"> By categorizing persons as &quot;seeking or available for work&quot; Census has differentiated them from those who are not in the job market, which includes housewives, students, and others. </p> <p align="justify"> This appears to be an all-time high for Census years. In 2001, about 23% of households had members that were unemployed. Within a decade, this had risen to 28%. In the past three years, no particular spurt in employment growth or policies that would catalyse job creation have emerged and the situation continues to be dire. </p> <p align="justify"> These exceptionally high unemployment levels are likely to have contributed to the severe loss the UPA suffered in the 2014 elections. Many pre-election opinion polls had underlined that unemployment was a key issue with voters. These stark figures would also be a wake-up call for the new Modi sarkar. </p> <p align="justify"> As reported previously by TOI, over 20% of youth between 15 to 24 years of age were jobless and seeking work according to Census 2011 data released earlier. In absolute terms, this army of unemployed youth is about 47 million. </p> <p align="justify"> The number of unemployed persons is actually more than 113 million because the Census office has released data in terms of how many persons per household are seeking or available for work, and the highest number in that is &quot;more than 4&quot;. For the purpose of the present computation, this has been taken as four persons only. </p> <p align="justify"> There has been a distinct shift in the employment pattern since 2001. In most states, and nationally, the employment situation is relatively better in urban areas than in rural areas. Nationally, 23% of urban households reported that they had at least one member unemployed while in rural areas this share went up to 30%. In 2001, the rural-urban difference was not so much. The reason behind this appears to be the deep agricultural crisis. </p> <p align="justify"> Statewise unemployment figures reveal that while most states have approximately the same proportion of households with some member unemployed as the national average, some states have much higher rates. These include Jammu &amp; Kashmir with about 48% households having unemployed persons, Bihar (35%), Assam (38%), West Bengal (54%), Jharkhand (42%), Odisha (39%) and Kerala (42%). </p> <p align="justify"> At the other end, Maharashtra (14%), Gujarat (12%), Andhra Pradesh (18%) Karnataka (14%) and Tamil Nadu (18%) all seem to be doing much better than other states in providing jobs. These are states with high degrees of industrialization and of urbanization. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 24 September, 2014, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Army-of-jobseekers-now-11cr-strong/articleshow/43266422.cms?', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'army-of-jobseekers-now-11cr-strong-subodh-varma-4674052', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4674052, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 26014, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Army of jobseekers now 11cr-strong -Subodh Varma', 'metaKeywords' => 'Census 2011,Employment,youth,Unemployment', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Times of India Over 113 million persons were &quot;seeking or available for work&quot;, that is, they were unemployed, according to Census 2011 data released today. This huge number made up around 15% of the working age population of about 748...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify">Over 113 million persons were &quot;seeking or available for work&quot;, that is, they were unemployed, according to Census 2011 data released today. This huge number made up around 15% of the working age population of about 748 million persons in the 15 to 60 years age group. These unemployed persons were distributed over nearly 70 million families or households. That's about 28% of all households in the country.</p><p align="justify">By categorizing persons as &quot;seeking or available for work&quot; Census has differentiated them from those who are not in the job market, which includes housewives, students, and others.</p><p align="justify">This appears to be an all-time high for Census years. In 2001, about 23% of households had members that were unemployed. Within a decade, this had risen to 28%. In the past three years, no particular spurt in employment growth or policies that would catalyse job creation have emerged and the situation continues to be dire.</p><p align="justify">These exceptionally high unemployment levels are likely to have contributed to the severe loss the UPA suffered in the 2014 elections. Many pre-election opinion polls had underlined that unemployment was a key issue with voters. These stark figures would also be a wake-up call for the new Modi sarkar.</p><p align="justify">As reported previously by TOI, over 20% of youth between 15 to 24 years of age were jobless and seeking work according to Census 2011 data released earlier. In absolute terms, this army of unemployed youth is about 47 million.</p><p align="justify">The number of unemployed persons is actually more than 113 million because the Census office has released data in terms of how many persons per household are seeking or available for work, and the highest number in that is &quot;more than 4&quot;. For the purpose of the present computation, this has been taken as four persons only.</p><p align="justify">There has been a distinct shift in the employment pattern since 2001. In most states, and nationally, the employment situation is relatively better in urban areas than in rural areas. Nationally, 23% of urban households reported that they had at least one member unemployed while in rural areas this share went up to 30%. In 2001, the rural-urban difference was not so much. The reason behind this appears to be the deep agricultural crisis.</p><p align="justify">Statewise unemployment figures reveal that while most states have approximately the same proportion of households with some member unemployed as the national average, some states have much higher rates. These include Jammu &amp; Kashmir with about 48% households having unemployed persons, Bihar (35%), Assam (38%), West Bengal (54%), Jharkhand (42%), Odisha (39%) and Kerala (42%).</p><p align="justify">At the other end, Maharashtra (14%), Gujarat (12%), Andhra Pradesh (18%) Karnataka (14%) and Tamil Nadu (18%) all seem to be doing much better than other states in providing jobs. These are states with high degrees of industrialization and of urbanization. </p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 26014, 'title' => 'Army of jobseekers now 11cr-strong -Subodh Varma', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India </div> <p align="justify"> Over 113 million persons were &quot;seeking or available for work&quot;, that is, they were unemployed, according to Census 2011 data released today. This huge number made up around 15% of the working age population of about 748 million persons in the 15 to 60 years age group. These unemployed persons were distributed over nearly 70 million families or households. That's about 28% of all households in the country. </p> <p align="justify"> By categorizing persons as &quot;seeking or available for work&quot; Census has differentiated them from those who are not in the job market, which includes housewives, students, and others. </p> <p align="justify"> This appears to be an all-time high for Census years. In 2001, about 23% of households had members that were unemployed. Within a decade, this had risen to 28%. In the past three years, no particular spurt in employment growth or policies that would catalyse job creation have emerged and the situation continues to be dire. </p> <p align="justify"> These exceptionally high unemployment levels are likely to have contributed to the severe loss the UPA suffered in the 2014 elections. Many pre-election opinion polls had underlined that unemployment was a key issue with voters. These stark figures would also be a wake-up call for the new Modi sarkar. </p> <p align="justify"> As reported previously by TOI, over 20% of youth between 15 to 24 years of age were jobless and seeking work according to Census 2011 data released earlier. In absolute terms, this army of unemployed youth is about 47 million. </p> <p align="justify"> The number of unemployed persons is actually more than 113 million because the Census office has released data in terms of how many persons per household are seeking or available for work, and the highest number in that is &quot;more than 4&quot;. For the purpose of the present computation, this has been taken as four persons only. </p> <p align="justify"> There has been a distinct shift in the employment pattern since 2001. In most states, and nationally, the employment situation is relatively better in urban areas than in rural areas. Nationally, 23% of urban households reported that they had at least one member unemployed while in rural areas this share went up to 30%. In 2001, the rural-urban difference was not so much. The reason behind this appears to be the deep agricultural crisis. </p> <p align="justify"> Statewise unemployment figures reveal that while most states have approximately the same proportion of households with some member unemployed as the national average, some states have much higher rates. These include Jammu &amp; Kashmir with about 48% households having unemployed persons, Bihar (35%), Assam (38%), West Bengal (54%), Jharkhand (42%), Odisha (39%) and Kerala (42%). </p> <p align="justify"> At the other end, Maharashtra (14%), Gujarat (12%), Andhra Pradesh (18%) Karnataka (14%) and Tamil Nadu (18%) all seem to be doing much better than other states in providing jobs. These are states with high degrees of industrialization and of urbanization. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 24 September, 2014, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Army-of-jobseekers-now-11cr-strong/articleshow/43266422.cms?', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'army-of-jobseekers-now-11cr-strong-subodh-varma-4674052', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4674052, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 26014 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Army of jobseekers now 11cr-strong -Subodh Varma' $metaKeywords = 'Census 2011,Employment,youth,Unemployment' $metaDesc = ' -The Times of India Over 113 million persons were &quot;seeking or available for work&quot;, that is, they were unemployed, according to Census 2011 data released today. This huge number made up around 15% of the working age population of about 748...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify">Over 113 million persons were &quot;seeking or available for work&quot;, that is, they were unemployed, according to Census 2011 data released today. This huge number made up around 15% of the working age population of about 748 million persons in the 15 to 60 years age group. These unemployed persons were distributed over nearly 70 million families or households. That's about 28% of all households in the country.</p><p align="justify">By categorizing persons as &quot;seeking or available for work&quot; Census has differentiated them from those who are not in the job market, which includes housewives, students, and others.</p><p align="justify">This appears to be an all-time high for Census years. In 2001, about 23% of households had members that were unemployed. Within a decade, this had risen to 28%. In the past three years, no particular spurt in employment growth or policies that would catalyse job creation have emerged and the situation continues to be dire.</p><p align="justify">These exceptionally high unemployment levels are likely to have contributed to the severe loss the UPA suffered in the 2014 elections. Many pre-election opinion polls had underlined that unemployment was a key issue with voters. These stark figures would also be a wake-up call for the new Modi sarkar.</p><p align="justify">As reported previously by TOI, over 20% of youth between 15 to 24 years of age were jobless and seeking work according to Census 2011 data released earlier. In absolute terms, this army of unemployed youth is about 47 million.</p><p align="justify">The number of unemployed persons is actually more than 113 million because the Census office has released data in terms of how many persons per household are seeking or available for work, and the highest number in that is &quot;more than 4&quot;. For the purpose of the present computation, this has been taken as four persons only.</p><p align="justify">There has been a distinct shift in the employment pattern since 2001. In most states, and nationally, the employment situation is relatively better in urban areas than in rural areas. Nationally, 23% of urban households reported that they had at least one member unemployed while in rural areas this share went up to 30%. In 2001, the rural-urban difference was not so much. The reason behind this appears to be the deep agricultural crisis.</p><p align="justify">Statewise unemployment figures reveal that while most states have approximately the same proportion of households with some member unemployed as the national average, some states have much higher rates. These include Jammu &amp; Kashmir with about 48% households having unemployed persons, Bihar (35%), Assam (38%), West Bengal (54%), Jharkhand (42%), Odisha (39%) and Kerala (42%).</p><p align="justify">At the other end, Maharashtra (14%), Gujarat (12%), Andhra Pradesh (18%) Karnataka (14%) and Tamil Nadu (18%) all seem to be doing much better than other states in providing jobs. These are states with high degrees of industrialization and of urbanization. </p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/army-of-jobseekers-now-11cr-strong-subodh-varma-4674052.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Army of jobseekers now 11cr-strong -Subodh Varma | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Times of India Over 113 million persons were "seeking or available for work", that is, they were unemployed, according to Census 2011 data released today. This huge number made up around 15% of the working age population of about 748..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Army of jobseekers now 11cr-strong -Subodh Varma</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify">Over 113 million persons were "seeking or available for work", that is, they were unemployed, according to Census 2011 data released today. This huge number made up around 15% of the working age population of about 748 million persons in the 15 to 60 years age group. These unemployed persons were distributed over nearly 70 million families or households. That's about 28% of all households in the country.</p><p align="justify">By categorizing persons as "seeking or available for work" Census has differentiated them from those who are not in the job market, which includes housewives, students, and others.</p><p align="justify">This appears to be an all-time high for Census years. In 2001, about 23% of households had members that were unemployed. Within a decade, this had risen to 28%. In the past three years, no particular spurt in employment growth or policies that would catalyse job creation have emerged and the situation continues to be dire.</p><p align="justify">These exceptionally high unemployment levels are likely to have contributed to the severe loss the UPA suffered in the 2014 elections. Many pre-election opinion polls had underlined that unemployment was a key issue with voters. These stark figures would also be a wake-up call for the new Modi sarkar.</p><p align="justify">As reported previously by TOI, over 20% of youth between 15 to 24 years of age were jobless and seeking work according to Census 2011 data released earlier. In absolute terms, this army of unemployed youth is about 47 million.</p><p align="justify">The number of unemployed persons is actually more than 113 million because the Census office has released data in terms of how many persons per household are seeking or available for work, and the highest number in that is "more than 4". For the purpose of the present computation, this has been taken as four persons only.</p><p align="justify">There has been a distinct shift in the employment pattern since 2001. In most states, and nationally, the employment situation is relatively better in urban areas than in rural areas. Nationally, 23% of urban households reported that they had at least one member unemployed while in rural areas this share went up to 30%. In 2001, the rural-urban difference was not so much. The reason behind this appears to be the deep agricultural crisis.</p><p align="justify">Statewise unemployment figures reveal that while most states have approximately the same proportion of households with some member unemployed as the national average, some states have much higher rates. These include Jammu & Kashmir with about 48% households having unemployed persons, Bihar (35%), Assam (38%), West Bengal (54%), Jharkhand (42%), Odisha (39%) and Kerala (42%).</p><p align="justify">At the other end, Maharashtra (14%), Gujarat (12%), Andhra Pradesh (18%) Karnataka (14%) and Tamil Nadu (18%) all seem to be doing much better than other states in providing jobs. These are states with high degrees of industrialization and of urbanization. </p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68182181cd56c-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68182181cd56c-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68182181cd56c-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68182181cd56c-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68182181cd56c-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68182181cd56c-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68182181cd56c-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68182181cd56c-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68182181cd56c-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 26014, 'title' => 'Army of jobseekers now 11cr-strong -Subodh Varma', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India </div> <p align="justify"> Over 113 million persons were &quot;seeking or available for work&quot;, that is, they were unemployed, according to Census 2011 data released today. This huge number made up around 15% of the working age population of about 748 million persons in the 15 to 60 years age group. These unemployed persons were distributed over nearly 70 million families or households. That's about 28% of all households in the country. </p> <p align="justify"> By categorizing persons as &quot;seeking or available for work&quot; Census has differentiated them from those who are not in the job market, which includes housewives, students, and others. </p> <p align="justify"> This appears to be an all-time high for Census years. In 2001, about 23% of households had members that were unemployed. Within a decade, this had risen to 28%. In the past three years, no particular spurt in employment growth or policies that would catalyse job creation have emerged and the situation continues to be dire. </p> <p align="justify"> These exceptionally high unemployment levels are likely to have contributed to the severe loss the UPA suffered in the 2014 elections. Many pre-election opinion polls had underlined that unemployment was a key issue with voters. These stark figures would also be a wake-up call for the new Modi sarkar. </p> <p align="justify"> As reported previously by TOI, over 20% of youth between 15 to 24 years of age were jobless and seeking work according to Census 2011 data released earlier. In absolute terms, this army of unemployed youth is about 47 million. </p> <p align="justify"> The number of unemployed persons is actually more than 113 million because the Census office has released data in terms of how many persons per household are seeking or available for work, and the highest number in that is &quot;more than 4&quot;. For the purpose of the present computation, this has been taken as four persons only. </p> <p align="justify"> There has been a distinct shift in the employment pattern since 2001. In most states, and nationally, the employment situation is relatively better in urban areas than in rural areas. Nationally, 23% of urban households reported that they had at least one member unemployed while in rural areas this share went up to 30%. In 2001, the rural-urban difference was not so much. The reason behind this appears to be the deep agricultural crisis. </p> <p align="justify"> Statewise unemployment figures reveal that while most states have approximately the same proportion of households with some member unemployed as the national average, some states have much higher rates. These include Jammu &amp; Kashmir with about 48% households having unemployed persons, Bihar (35%), Assam (38%), West Bengal (54%), Jharkhand (42%), Odisha (39%) and Kerala (42%). </p> <p align="justify"> At the other end, Maharashtra (14%), Gujarat (12%), Andhra Pradesh (18%) Karnataka (14%) and Tamil Nadu (18%) all seem to be doing much better than other states in providing jobs. These are states with high degrees of industrialization and of urbanization. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 24 September, 2014, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Army-of-jobseekers-now-11cr-strong/articleshow/43266422.cms?', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'army-of-jobseekers-now-11cr-strong-subodh-varma-4674052', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4674052, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 26014, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Army of jobseekers now 11cr-strong -Subodh Varma', 'metaKeywords' => 'Census 2011,Employment,youth,Unemployment', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Times of India Over 113 million persons were &quot;seeking or available for work&quot;, that is, they were unemployed, according to Census 2011 data released today. This huge number made up around 15% of the working age population of about 748...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify">Over 113 million persons were &quot;seeking or available for work&quot;, that is, they were unemployed, according to Census 2011 data released today. This huge number made up around 15% of the working age population of about 748 million persons in the 15 to 60 years age group. These unemployed persons were distributed over nearly 70 million families or households. That's about 28% of all households in the country.</p><p align="justify">By categorizing persons as &quot;seeking or available for work&quot; Census has differentiated them from those who are not in the job market, which includes housewives, students, and others.</p><p align="justify">This appears to be an all-time high for Census years. In 2001, about 23% of households had members that were unemployed. Within a decade, this had risen to 28%. In the past three years, no particular spurt in employment growth or policies that would catalyse job creation have emerged and the situation continues to be dire.</p><p align="justify">These exceptionally high unemployment levels are likely to have contributed to the severe loss the UPA suffered in the 2014 elections. Many pre-election opinion polls had underlined that unemployment was a key issue with voters. These stark figures would also be a wake-up call for the new Modi sarkar.</p><p align="justify">As reported previously by TOI, over 20% of youth between 15 to 24 years of age were jobless and seeking work according to Census 2011 data released earlier. In absolute terms, this army of unemployed youth is about 47 million.</p><p align="justify">The number of unemployed persons is actually more than 113 million because the Census office has released data in terms of how many persons per household are seeking or available for work, and the highest number in that is &quot;more than 4&quot;. For the purpose of the present computation, this has been taken as four persons only.</p><p align="justify">There has been a distinct shift in the employment pattern since 2001. In most states, and nationally, the employment situation is relatively better in urban areas than in rural areas. Nationally, 23% of urban households reported that they had at least one member unemployed while in rural areas this share went up to 30%. In 2001, the rural-urban difference was not so much. The reason behind this appears to be the deep agricultural crisis.</p><p align="justify">Statewise unemployment figures reveal that while most states have approximately the same proportion of households with some member unemployed as the national average, some states have much higher rates. These include Jammu &amp; Kashmir with about 48% households having unemployed persons, Bihar (35%), Assam (38%), West Bengal (54%), Jharkhand (42%), Odisha (39%) and Kerala (42%).</p><p align="justify">At the other end, Maharashtra (14%), Gujarat (12%), Andhra Pradesh (18%) Karnataka (14%) and Tamil Nadu (18%) all seem to be doing much better than other states in providing jobs. These are states with high degrees of industrialization and of urbanization. </p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 26014, 'title' => 'Army of jobseekers now 11cr-strong -Subodh Varma', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India </div> <p align="justify"> Over 113 million persons were &quot;seeking or available for work&quot;, that is, they were unemployed, according to Census 2011 data released today. This huge number made up around 15% of the working age population of about 748 million persons in the 15 to 60 years age group. These unemployed persons were distributed over nearly 70 million families or households. That's about 28% of all households in the country. </p> <p align="justify"> By categorizing persons as &quot;seeking or available for work&quot; Census has differentiated them from those who are not in the job market, which includes housewives, students, and others. </p> <p align="justify"> This appears to be an all-time high for Census years. In 2001, about 23% of households had members that were unemployed. Within a decade, this had risen to 28%. In the past three years, no particular spurt in employment growth or policies that would catalyse job creation have emerged and the situation continues to be dire. </p> <p align="justify"> These exceptionally high unemployment levels are likely to have contributed to the severe loss the UPA suffered in the 2014 elections. Many pre-election opinion polls had underlined that unemployment was a key issue with voters. These stark figures would also be a wake-up call for the new Modi sarkar. </p> <p align="justify"> As reported previously by TOI, over 20% of youth between 15 to 24 years of age were jobless and seeking work according to Census 2011 data released earlier. In absolute terms, this army of unemployed youth is about 47 million. </p> <p align="justify"> The number of unemployed persons is actually more than 113 million because the Census office has released data in terms of how many persons per household are seeking or available for work, and the highest number in that is &quot;more than 4&quot;. For the purpose of the present computation, this has been taken as four persons only. </p> <p align="justify"> There has been a distinct shift in the employment pattern since 2001. In most states, and nationally, the employment situation is relatively better in urban areas than in rural areas. Nationally, 23% of urban households reported that they had at least one member unemployed while in rural areas this share went up to 30%. In 2001, the rural-urban difference was not so much. The reason behind this appears to be the deep agricultural crisis. </p> <p align="justify"> Statewise unemployment figures reveal that while most states have approximately the same proportion of households with some member unemployed as the national average, some states have much higher rates. These include Jammu &amp; Kashmir with about 48% households having unemployed persons, Bihar (35%), Assam (38%), West Bengal (54%), Jharkhand (42%), Odisha (39%) and Kerala (42%). </p> <p align="justify"> At the other end, Maharashtra (14%), Gujarat (12%), Andhra Pradesh (18%) Karnataka (14%) and Tamil Nadu (18%) all seem to be doing much better than other states in providing jobs. These are states with high degrees of industrialization and of urbanization. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 24 September, 2014, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Army-of-jobseekers-now-11cr-strong/articleshow/43266422.cms?', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'army-of-jobseekers-now-11cr-strong-subodh-varma-4674052', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4674052, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 26014 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Army of jobseekers now 11cr-strong -Subodh Varma' $metaKeywords = 'Census 2011,Employment,youth,Unemployment' $metaDesc = ' -The Times of India Over 113 million persons were &quot;seeking or available for work&quot;, that is, they were unemployed, according to Census 2011 data released today. This huge number made up around 15% of the working age population of about 748...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify">Over 113 million persons were &quot;seeking or available for work&quot;, that is, they were unemployed, according to Census 2011 data released today. This huge number made up around 15% of the working age population of about 748 million persons in the 15 to 60 years age group. These unemployed persons were distributed over nearly 70 million families or households. That's about 28% of all households in the country.</p><p align="justify">By categorizing persons as &quot;seeking or available for work&quot; Census has differentiated them from those who are not in the job market, which includes housewives, students, and others.</p><p align="justify">This appears to be an all-time high for Census years. In 2001, about 23% of households had members that were unemployed. Within a decade, this had risen to 28%. In the past three years, no particular spurt in employment growth or policies that would catalyse job creation have emerged and the situation continues to be dire.</p><p align="justify">These exceptionally high unemployment levels are likely to have contributed to the severe loss the UPA suffered in the 2014 elections. Many pre-election opinion polls had underlined that unemployment was a key issue with voters. These stark figures would also be a wake-up call for the new Modi sarkar.</p><p align="justify">As reported previously by TOI, over 20% of youth between 15 to 24 years of age were jobless and seeking work according to Census 2011 data released earlier. In absolute terms, this army of unemployed youth is about 47 million.</p><p align="justify">The number of unemployed persons is actually more than 113 million because the Census office has released data in terms of how many persons per household are seeking or available for work, and the highest number in that is &quot;more than 4&quot;. For the purpose of the present computation, this has been taken as four persons only.</p><p align="justify">There has been a distinct shift in the employment pattern since 2001. In most states, and nationally, the employment situation is relatively better in urban areas than in rural areas. Nationally, 23% of urban households reported that they had at least one member unemployed while in rural areas this share went up to 30%. In 2001, the rural-urban difference was not so much. The reason behind this appears to be the deep agricultural crisis.</p><p align="justify">Statewise unemployment figures reveal that while most states have approximately the same proportion of households with some member unemployed as the national average, some states have much higher rates. These include Jammu &amp; Kashmir with about 48% households having unemployed persons, Bihar (35%), Assam (38%), West Bengal (54%), Jharkhand (42%), Odisha (39%) and Kerala (42%).</p><p align="justify">At the other end, Maharashtra (14%), Gujarat (12%), Andhra Pradesh (18%) Karnataka (14%) and Tamil Nadu (18%) all seem to be doing much better than other states in providing jobs. These are states with high degrees of industrialization and of urbanization. </p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/army-of-jobseekers-now-11cr-strong-subodh-varma-4674052.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Army of jobseekers now 11cr-strong -Subodh Varma | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Times of India Over 113 million persons were "seeking or available for work", that is, they were unemployed, according to Census 2011 data released today. This huge number made up around 15% of the working age population of about 748..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Army of jobseekers now 11cr-strong -Subodh Varma</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify">Over 113 million persons were "seeking or available for work", that is, they were unemployed, according to Census 2011 data released today. This huge number made up around 15% of the working age population of about 748 million persons in the 15 to 60 years age group. These unemployed persons were distributed over nearly 70 million families or households. That's about 28% of all households in the country.</p><p align="justify">By categorizing persons as "seeking or available for work" Census has differentiated them from those who are not in the job market, which includes housewives, students, and others.</p><p align="justify">This appears to be an all-time high for Census years. In 2001, about 23% of households had members that were unemployed. Within a decade, this had risen to 28%. In the past three years, no particular spurt in employment growth or policies that would catalyse job creation have emerged and the situation continues to be dire.</p><p align="justify">These exceptionally high unemployment levels are likely to have contributed to the severe loss the UPA suffered in the 2014 elections. Many pre-election opinion polls had underlined that unemployment was a key issue with voters. These stark figures would also be a wake-up call for the new Modi sarkar.</p><p align="justify">As reported previously by TOI, over 20% of youth between 15 to 24 years of age were jobless and seeking work according to Census 2011 data released earlier. In absolute terms, this army of unemployed youth is about 47 million.</p><p align="justify">The number of unemployed persons is actually more than 113 million because the Census office has released data in terms of how many persons per household are seeking or available for work, and the highest number in that is "more than 4". For the purpose of the present computation, this has been taken as four persons only.</p><p align="justify">There has been a distinct shift in the employment pattern since 2001. In most states, and nationally, the employment situation is relatively better in urban areas than in rural areas. Nationally, 23% of urban households reported that they had at least one member unemployed while in rural areas this share went up to 30%. In 2001, the rural-urban difference was not so much. The reason behind this appears to be the deep agricultural crisis.</p><p align="justify">Statewise unemployment figures reveal that while most states have approximately the same proportion of households with some member unemployed as the national average, some states have much higher rates. These include Jammu & Kashmir with about 48% households having unemployed persons, Bihar (35%), Assam (38%), West Bengal (54%), Jharkhand (42%), Odisha (39%) and Kerala (42%).</p><p align="justify">At the other end, Maharashtra (14%), Gujarat (12%), Andhra Pradesh (18%) Karnataka (14%) and Tamil Nadu (18%) all seem to be doing much better than other states in providing jobs. These are states with high degrees of industrialization and of urbanization. </p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 26014, 'title' => 'Army of jobseekers now 11cr-strong -Subodh Varma', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India </div> <p align="justify"> Over 113 million persons were "seeking or available for work", that is, they were unemployed, according to Census 2011 data released today. This huge number made up around 15% of the working age population of about 748 million persons in the 15 to 60 years age group. These unemployed persons were distributed over nearly 70 million families or households. That's about 28% of all households in the country. </p> <p align="justify"> By categorizing persons as "seeking or available for work" Census has differentiated them from those who are not in the job market, which includes housewives, students, and others. </p> <p align="justify"> This appears to be an all-time high for Census years. In 2001, about 23% of households had members that were unemployed. Within a decade, this had risen to 28%. In the past three years, no particular spurt in employment growth or policies that would catalyse job creation have emerged and the situation continues to be dire. </p> <p align="justify"> These exceptionally high unemployment levels are likely to have contributed to the severe loss the UPA suffered in the 2014 elections. Many pre-election opinion polls had underlined that unemployment was a key issue with voters. These stark figures would also be a wake-up call for the new Modi sarkar. </p> <p align="justify"> As reported previously by TOI, over 20% of youth between 15 to 24 years of age were jobless and seeking work according to Census 2011 data released earlier. In absolute terms, this army of unemployed youth is about 47 million. </p> <p align="justify"> The number of unemployed persons is actually more than 113 million because the Census office has released data in terms of how many persons per household are seeking or available for work, and the highest number in that is "more than 4". For the purpose of the present computation, this has been taken as four persons only. </p> <p align="justify"> There has been a distinct shift in the employment pattern since 2001. In most states, and nationally, the employment situation is relatively better in urban areas than in rural areas. Nationally, 23% of urban households reported that they had at least one member unemployed while in rural areas this share went up to 30%. In 2001, the rural-urban difference was not so much. The reason behind this appears to be the deep agricultural crisis. </p> <p align="justify"> Statewise unemployment figures reveal that while most states have approximately the same proportion of households with some member unemployed as the national average, some states have much higher rates. These include Jammu & Kashmir with about 48% households having unemployed persons, Bihar (35%), Assam (38%), West Bengal (54%), Jharkhand (42%), Odisha (39%) and Kerala (42%). </p> <p align="justify"> At the other end, Maharashtra (14%), Gujarat (12%), Andhra Pradesh (18%) Karnataka (14%) and Tamil Nadu (18%) all seem to be doing much better than other states in providing jobs. These are states with high degrees of industrialization and of urbanization. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 24 September, 2014, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Army-of-jobseekers-now-11cr-strong/articleshow/43266422.cms?', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'army-of-jobseekers-now-11cr-strong-subodh-varma-4674052', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4674052, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 26014, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Army of jobseekers now 11cr-strong -Subodh Varma', 'metaKeywords' => 'Census 2011,Employment,youth,Unemployment', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Times of India Over 113 million persons were "seeking or available for work", that is, they were unemployed, according to Census 2011 data released today. This huge number made up around 15% of the working age population of about 748...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify">Over 113 million persons were "seeking or available for work", that is, they were unemployed, according to Census 2011 data released today. This huge number made up around 15% of the working age population of about 748 million persons in the 15 to 60 years age group. These unemployed persons were distributed over nearly 70 million families or households. That's about 28% of all households in the country.</p><p align="justify">By categorizing persons as "seeking or available for work" Census has differentiated them from those who are not in the job market, which includes housewives, students, and others.</p><p align="justify">This appears to be an all-time high for Census years. In 2001, about 23% of households had members that were unemployed. Within a decade, this had risen to 28%. In the past three years, no particular spurt in employment growth or policies that would catalyse job creation have emerged and the situation continues to be dire.</p><p align="justify">These exceptionally high unemployment levels are likely to have contributed to the severe loss the UPA suffered in the 2014 elections. Many pre-election opinion polls had underlined that unemployment was a key issue with voters. These stark figures would also be a wake-up call for the new Modi sarkar.</p><p align="justify">As reported previously by TOI, over 20% of youth between 15 to 24 years of age were jobless and seeking work according to Census 2011 data released earlier. In absolute terms, this army of unemployed youth is about 47 million.</p><p align="justify">The number of unemployed persons is actually more than 113 million because the Census office has released data in terms of how many persons per household are seeking or available for work, and the highest number in that is "more than 4". For the purpose of the present computation, this has been taken as four persons only.</p><p align="justify">There has been a distinct shift in the employment pattern since 2001. In most states, and nationally, the employment situation is relatively better in urban areas than in rural areas. Nationally, 23% of urban households reported that they had at least one member unemployed while in rural areas this share went up to 30%. In 2001, the rural-urban difference was not so much. The reason behind this appears to be the deep agricultural crisis.</p><p align="justify">Statewise unemployment figures reveal that while most states have approximately the same proportion of households with some member unemployed as the national average, some states have much higher rates. These include Jammu & Kashmir with about 48% households having unemployed persons, Bihar (35%), Assam (38%), West Bengal (54%), Jharkhand (42%), Odisha (39%) and Kerala (42%).</p><p align="justify">At the other end, Maharashtra (14%), Gujarat (12%), Andhra Pradesh (18%) Karnataka (14%) and Tamil Nadu (18%) all seem to be doing much better than other states in providing jobs. These are states with high degrees of industrialization and of urbanization. </p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 26014, 'title' => 'Army of jobseekers now 11cr-strong -Subodh Varma', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -The Times of India </div> <p align="justify"> Over 113 million persons were "seeking or available for work", that is, they were unemployed, according to Census 2011 data released today. This huge number made up around 15% of the working age population of about 748 million persons in the 15 to 60 years age group. These unemployed persons were distributed over nearly 70 million families or households. That's about 28% of all households in the country. </p> <p align="justify"> By categorizing persons as "seeking or available for work" Census has differentiated them from those who are not in the job market, which includes housewives, students, and others. </p> <p align="justify"> This appears to be an all-time high for Census years. In 2001, about 23% of households had members that were unemployed. Within a decade, this had risen to 28%. In the past three years, no particular spurt in employment growth or policies that would catalyse job creation have emerged and the situation continues to be dire. </p> <p align="justify"> These exceptionally high unemployment levels are likely to have contributed to the severe loss the UPA suffered in the 2014 elections. Many pre-election opinion polls had underlined that unemployment was a key issue with voters. These stark figures would also be a wake-up call for the new Modi sarkar. </p> <p align="justify"> As reported previously by TOI, over 20% of youth between 15 to 24 years of age were jobless and seeking work according to Census 2011 data released earlier. In absolute terms, this army of unemployed youth is about 47 million. </p> <p align="justify"> The number of unemployed persons is actually more than 113 million because the Census office has released data in terms of how many persons per household are seeking or available for work, and the highest number in that is "more than 4". For the purpose of the present computation, this has been taken as four persons only. </p> <p align="justify"> There has been a distinct shift in the employment pattern since 2001. In most states, and nationally, the employment situation is relatively better in urban areas than in rural areas. Nationally, 23% of urban households reported that they had at least one member unemployed while in rural areas this share went up to 30%. In 2001, the rural-urban difference was not so much. The reason behind this appears to be the deep agricultural crisis. </p> <p align="justify"> Statewise unemployment figures reveal that while most states have approximately the same proportion of households with some member unemployed as the national average, some states have much higher rates. These include Jammu & Kashmir with about 48% households having unemployed persons, Bihar (35%), Assam (38%), West Bengal (54%), Jharkhand (42%), Odisha (39%) and Kerala (42%). </p> <p align="justify"> At the other end, Maharashtra (14%), Gujarat (12%), Andhra Pradesh (18%) Karnataka (14%) and Tamil Nadu (18%) all seem to be doing much better than other states in providing jobs. These are states with high degrees of industrialization and of urbanization. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 24 September, 2014, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Army-of-jobseekers-now-11cr-strong/articleshow/43266422.cms?', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'army-of-jobseekers-now-11cr-strong-subodh-varma-4674052', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4674052, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 26014 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Army of jobseekers now 11cr-strong -Subodh Varma' $metaKeywords = 'Census 2011,Employment,youth,Unemployment' $metaDesc = ' -The Times of India Over 113 million persons were "seeking or available for work", that is, they were unemployed, according to Census 2011 data released today. This huge number made up around 15% of the working age population of about 748...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-The Times of India</div><p align="justify">Over 113 million persons were "seeking or available for work", that is, they were unemployed, according to Census 2011 data released today. This huge number made up around 15% of the working age population of about 748 million persons in the 15 to 60 years age group. These unemployed persons were distributed over nearly 70 million families or households. That's about 28% of all households in the country.</p><p align="justify">By categorizing persons as "seeking or available for work" Census has differentiated them from those who are not in the job market, which includes housewives, students, and others.</p><p align="justify">This appears to be an all-time high for Census years. In 2001, about 23% of households had members that were unemployed. Within a decade, this had risen to 28%. In the past three years, no particular spurt in employment growth or policies that would catalyse job creation have emerged and the situation continues to be dire.</p><p align="justify">These exceptionally high unemployment levels are likely to have contributed to the severe loss the UPA suffered in the 2014 elections. Many pre-election opinion polls had underlined that unemployment was a key issue with voters. These stark figures would also be a wake-up call for the new Modi sarkar.</p><p align="justify">As reported previously by TOI, over 20% of youth between 15 to 24 years of age were jobless and seeking work according to Census 2011 data released earlier. In absolute terms, this army of unemployed youth is about 47 million.</p><p align="justify">The number of unemployed persons is actually more than 113 million because the Census office has released data in terms of how many persons per household are seeking or available for work, and the highest number in that is "more than 4". For the purpose of the present computation, this has been taken as four persons only.</p><p align="justify">There has been a distinct shift in the employment pattern since 2001. In most states, and nationally, the employment situation is relatively better in urban areas than in rural areas. Nationally, 23% of urban households reported that they had at least one member unemployed while in rural areas this share went up to 30%. In 2001, the rural-urban difference was not so much. The reason behind this appears to be the deep agricultural crisis.</p><p align="justify">Statewise unemployment figures reveal that while most states have approximately the same proportion of households with some member unemployed as the national average, some states have much higher rates. These include Jammu & Kashmir with about 48% households having unemployed persons, Bihar (35%), Assam (38%), West Bengal (54%), Jharkhand (42%), Odisha (39%) and Kerala (42%).</p><p align="justify">At the other end, Maharashtra (14%), Gujarat (12%), Andhra Pradesh (18%) Karnataka (14%) and Tamil Nadu (18%) all seem to be doing much better than other states in providing jobs. These are states with high degrees of industrialization and of urbanization. </p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Army of jobseekers now 11cr-strong -Subodh Varma |
-The Times of India Over 113 million persons were "seeking or available for work", that is, they were unemployed, according to Census 2011 data released today. This huge number made up around 15% of the working age population of about 748 million persons in the 15 to 60 years age group. These unemployed persons were distributed over nearly 70 million families or households. That's about 28% of all households in the country. By categorizing persons as "seeking or available for work" Census has differentiated them from those who are not in the job market, which includes housewives, students, and others. This appears to be an all-time high for Census years. In 2001, about 23% of households had members that were unemployed. Within a decade, this had risen to 28%. In the past three years, no particular spurt in employment growth or policies that would catalyse job creation have emerged and the situation continues to be dire. These exceptionally high unemployment levels are likely to have contributed to the severe loss the UPA suffered in the 2014 elections. Many pre-election opinion polls had underlined that unemployment was a key issue with voters. These stark figures would also be a wake-up call for the new Modi sarkar. As reported previously by TOI, over 20% of youth between 15 to 24 years of age were jobless and seeking work according to Census 2011 data released earlier. In absolute terms, this army of unemployed youth is about 47 million. The number of unemployed persons is actually more than 113 million because the Census office has released data in terms of how many persons per household are seeking or available for work, and the highest number in that is "more than 4". For the purpose of the present computation, this has been taken as four persons only. There has been a distinct shift in the employment pattern since 2001. In most states, and nationally, the employment situation is relatively better in urban areas than in rural areas. Nationally, 23% of urban households reported that they had at least one member unemployed while in rural areas this share went up to 30%. In 2001, the rural-urban difference was not so much. The reason behind this appears to be the deep agricultural crisis. Statewise unemployment figures reveal that while most states have approximately the same proportion of households with some member unemployed as the national average, some states have much higher rates. These include Jammu & Kashmir with about 48% households having unemployed persons, Bihar (35%), Assam (38%), West Bengal (54%), Jharkhand (42%), Odisha (39%) and Kerala (42%). At the other end, Maharashtra (14%), Gujarat (12%), Andhra Pradesh (18%) Karnataka (14%) and Tamil Nadu (18%) all seem to be doing much better than other states in providing jobs. These are states with high degrees of industrialization and of urbanization. |