Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/auditor-raps-govt-role-in-kg-9960/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/auditor-raps-govt-role-in-kg-9960/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/auditor-raps-govt-role-in-kg-9960/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/auditor-raps-govt-role-in-kg-9960/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f698dd26bef-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f698dd26bef-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f698dd26bef-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f698dd26bef-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f698dd26bef-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f698dd26bef-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f698dd26bef-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f698dd26bef-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f698dd26bef-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 9851, 'title' => 'Auditor raps govt role in KG', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p> -The Telegraph </p> <p> &nbsp; </p> <div align="justify"> The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) has slammed the petroleum ministry for failing to take back 25 per cent of the acreage of the KG-D6 oil and gas block off the Andhra coast from Reliance Industries after it reneged on its drilling obligations.<br /> <br /> The long-awaited report from the CAG based on a detailed performance audit of the country&rsquo;s hydrocarbon production sharing contracts was tabled in Parliament today.<br /> <br /> The nation&rsquo;s auditor surprisingly did not comment on the bigger charge against Reliance Industries that it had &ldquo;gold-plated&rdquo; development costs at India&rsquo;s only commercially-operated deepwater gasfield to depress the government&rsquo;s share of profit petroleum from the gasfield.<br /> <br /> The CAG did not say whether the approval by the upstream regulator &mdash; the directorate general of hydrocarbons &mdash; of RIL&rsquo;s plan to raise the development cost from $2.4 billion in 2004 to $8.8 billion in 2006 was justified or not.<br /> <br /> All that the CAG said was that the &ldquo;approval of estimates does not constitute acceptance of the project costs,&rdquo; suggesting that this could be done only after a thorough audit of the actual costs incurred.<br /> <br /> The report did, however, express some reservations about the hike in development costs. It said that with gas output from KG-D6 plunging to about 43 million standard cubic metres per day (mmscmd) &mdash; which is close to the 40 mmscmd output level envisaged in the 2004 investment plan &mdash; doubts could be raised about &ldquo;whether the upgradation to 80mmscmd with substantial increase in the development cost (to $8.8 billion) was justified&rdquo;.<br /> <br /> The report blamed the petroleum ministry and the DGH for allowing Reliance to retain the entire 7,645 sq km KG-DWN-98/3 (KG-D6) block in the Bay of Bengal after the giant Dhirubhai-1 and 3 gas finds were made in 2001. The report said if the penal provisions of the production-sharing contract (PSC) had been enforced, Reliance would have had to relinquish 25 per cent of the total area outside the discoveries in June 2004 and 2005.<br /> <br /> The petroleum ministry had declared the entire block as a &ldquo;discovery area&rdquo; and allowed the company to retain it.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;We recommend that the ministry of petroleum and natural gas should review the determination of the entire contract area as &lsquo;discovery area&rsquo; strictly in terms of the PSC provisions&hellip;.delineation of the discovery area and relinquishment of the rest (by RIL),&rdquo; the report said.<br /> <br /> Reliance had committed to drill 22 wells in KG-D6 in fiscal 2011. However, the company had drilled 20 wells in the D1 and D3 areas. Of these, only 18 are in production, and petroleum experts say this is one of the main reasons for the sharp decline in the gas production from the field to about 43 mmscmd from 61.5 mmscmd.<br /> <br /> India&rsquo;s only deepwater block that started commercial production two years ago was supposed to raise production to 69 mmscmd by April.<br /> <br /> <em>RIL stock surge<br /> </em><br /> The RIL stock surged after market mavens realised that the CAG report wasn&rsquo;t as damaging as they had feared. The stock &mdash; which has been under considerable pressure since mid-June when portions of the CAG&rsquo;s draft report were leaked to the media &mdash; soared to close at Rs 853.50, a gain of 2.62 per cent. Experts say the stock can now stage a &ldquo;relief rally&rdquo; as the auditor hasn&rsquo;t come down as hard on it.<br /> <br /> Reliance said it could not comment on the final audit findings of the CAG as it was &ldquo;yet to see the report&rdquo;.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;We reiterate that, as a contractor, we remain committed to complying with the production sharing contract provisions and procedures, including adopting good international petroleum industry practices in our operations,&rdquo; it said.<br /> <br /> <em>Profit-sharing logic<br /> </em><br /> The CAG questioned the slabs for profit sharing between the operator and the government. It contended that these slabs were structured in such a way that the government&rsquo;s share of profit petroleum would go down if the capital intensity of the project increased.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;In view of the adverse impact of the profit-sharing mechanism in protecting government&rsquo;s interest, designed in the 1990s, there does seem to be enough ground to revisit the formula,&rdquo; CAG said.<br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 9 September, 2011, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1110909/jsp/business/story_14484602.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'auditor-raps-govt-role-in-kg-9960', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 9960, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 9851, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Auditor raps govt role in KG', 'metaKeywords' => 'Comptroller and Auditor-General,CAG', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Telegraph &nbsp; The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) has slammed the petroleum ministry for failing to take back 25 per cent of the acreage of the KG-D6 oil and gas block off the Andhra coast from Reliance Industries after it reneged...', 'disp' => '<p>-The Telegraph</p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) has slammed the petroleum ministry for failing to take back 25 per cent of the acreage of the KG-D6 oil and gas block off the Andhra coast from Reliance Industries after it reneged on its drilling obligations.<br /><br />The long-awaited report from the CAG based on a detailed performance audit of the country&rsquo;s hydrocarbon production sharing contracts was tabled in Parliament today.<br /><br />The nation&rsquo;s auditor surprisingly did not comment on the bigger charge against Reliance Industries that it had &ldquo;gold-plated&rdquo; development costs at India&rsquo;s only commercially-operated deepwater gasfield to depress the government&rsquo;s share of profit petroleum from the gasfield.<br /><br />The CAG did not say whether the approval by the upstream regulator &mdash; the directorate general of hydrocarbons &mdash; of RIL&rsquo;s plan to raise the development cost from $2.4 billion in 2004 to $8.8 billion in 2006 was justified or not.<br /><br />All that the CAG said was that the &ldquo;approval of estimates does not constitute acceptance of the project costs,&rdquo; suggesting that this could be done only after a thorough audit of the actual costs incurred.<br /><br />The report did, however, express some reservations about the hike in development costs. It said that with gas output from KG-D6 plunging to about 43 million standard cubic metres per day (mmscmd) &mdash; which is close to the 40 mmscmd output level envisaged in the 2004 investment plan &mdash; doubts could be raised about &ldquo;whether the upgradation to 80mmscmd with substantial increase in the development cost (to $8.8 billion) was justified&rdquo;.<br /><br />The report blamed the petroleum ministry and the DGH for allowing Reliance to retain the entire 7,645 sq km KG-DWN-98/3 (KG-D6) block in the Bay of Bengal after the giant Dhirubhai-1 and 3 gas finds were made in 2001. The report said if the penal provisions of the production-sharing contract (PSC) had been enforced, Reliance would have had to relinquish 25 per cent of the total area outside the discoveries in June 2004 and 2005.<br /><br />The petroleum ministry had declared the entire block as a &ldquo;discovery area&rdquo; and allowed the company to retain it.<br /><br />&ldquo;We recommend that the ministry of petroleum and natural gas should review the determination of the entire contract area as &lsquo;discovery area&rsquo; strictly in terms of the PSC provisions&hellip;.delineation of the discovery area and relinquishment of the rest (by RIL),&rdquo; the report said.<br /><br />Reliance had committed to drill 22 wells in KG-D6 in fiscal 2011. However, the company had drilled 20 wells in the D1 and D3 areas. Of these, only 18 are in production, and petroleum experts say this is one of the main reasons for the sharp decline in the gas production from the field to about 43 mmscmd from 61.5 mmscmd.<br /><br />India&rsquo;s only deepwater block that started commercial production two years ago was supposed to raise production to 69 mmscmd by April.<br /><br /><em>RIL stock surge<br /></em><br />The RIL stock surged after market mavens realised that the CAG report wasn&rsquo;t as damaging as they had feared. The stock &mdash; which has been under considerable pressure since mid-June when portions of the CAG&rsquo;s draft report were leaked to the media &mdash; soared to close at Rs 853.50, a gain of 2.62 per cent. Experts say the stock can now stage a &ldquo;relief rally&rdquo; as the auditor hasn&rsquo;t come down as hard on it.<br /><br />Reliance said it could not comment on the final audit findings of the CAG as it was &ldquo;yet to see the report&rdquo;.<br /><br />&ldquo;We reiterate that, as a contractor, we remain committed to complying with the production sharing contract provisions and procedures, including adopting good international petroleum industry practices in our operations,&rdquo; it said.<br /><br /><em>Profit-sharing logic<br /></em><br />The CAG questioned the slabs for profit sharing between the operator and the government. It contended that these slabs were structured in such a way that the government&rsquo;s share of profit petroleum would go down if the capital intensity of the project increased.<br /><br />&ldquo;In view of the adverse impact of the profit-sharing mechanism in protecting government&rsquo;s interest, designed in the 1990s, there does seem to be enough ground to revisit the formula,&rdquo; CAG said.<br /><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 9851, 'title' => 'Auditor raps govt role in KG', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p> -The Telegraph </p> <p> &nbsp; </p> <div align="justify"> The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) has slammed the petroleum ministry for failing to take back 25 per cent of the acreage of the KG-D6 oil and gas block off the Andhra coast from Reliance Industries after it reneged on its drilling obligations.<br /> <br /> The long-awaited report from the CAG based on a detailed performance audit of the country&rsquo;s hydrocarbon production sharing contracts was tabled in Parliament today.<br /> <br /> The nation&rsquo;s auditor surprisingly did not comment on the bigger charge against Reliance Industries that it had &ldquo;gold-plated&rdquo; development costs at India&rsquo;s only commercially-operated deepwater gasfield to depress the government&rsquo;s share of profit petroleum from the gasfield.<br /> <br /> The CAG did not say whether the approval by the upstream regulator &mdash; the directorate general of hydrocarbons &mdash; of RIL&rsquo;s plan to raise the development cost from $2.4 billion in 2004 to $8.8 billion in 2006 was justified or not.<br /> <br /> All that the CAG said was that the &ldquo;approval of estimates does not constitute acceptance of the project costs,&rdquo; suggesting that this could be done only after a thorough audit of the actual costs incurred.<br /> <br /> The report did, however, express some reservations about the hike in development costs. It said that with gas output from KG-D6 plunging to about 43 million standard cubic metres per day (mmscmd) &mdash; which is close to the 40 mmscmd output level envisaged in the 2004 investment plan &mdash; doubts could be raised about &ldquo;whether the upgradation to 80mmscmd with substantial increase in the development cost (to $8.8 billion) was justified&rdquo;.<br /> <br /> The report blamed the petroleum ministry and the DGH for allowing Reliance to retain the entire 7,645 sq km KG-DWN-98/3 (KG-D6) block in the Bay of Bengal after the giant Dhirubhai-1 and 3 gas finds were made in 2001. The report said if the penal provisions of the production-sharing contract (PSC) had been enforced, Reliance would have had to relinquish 25 per cent of the total area outside the discoveries in June 2004 and 2005.<br /> <br /> The petroleum ministry had declared the entire block as a &ldquo;discovery area&rdquo; and allowed the company to retain it.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;We recommend that the ministry of petroleum and natural gas should review the determination of the entire contract area as &lsquo;discovery area&rsquo; strictly in terms of the PSC provisions&hellip;.delineation of the discovery area and relinquishment of the rest (by RIL),&rdquo; the report said.<br /> <br /> Reliance had committed to drill 22 wells in KG-D6 in fiscal 2011. However, the company had drilled 20 wells in the D1 and D3 areas. Of these, only 18 are in production, and petroleum experts say this is one of the main reasons for the sharp decline in the gas production from the field to about 43 mmscmd from 61.5 mmscmd.<br /> <br /> India&rsquo;s only deepwater block that started commercial production two years ago was supposed to raise production to 69 mmscmd by April.<br /> <br /> <em>RIL stock surge<br /> </em><br /> The RIL stock surged after market mavens realised that the CAG report wasn&rsquo;t as damaging as they had feared. The stock &mdash; which has been under considerable pressure since mid-June when portions of the CAG&rsquo;s draft report were leaked to the media &mdash; soared to close at Rs 853.50, a gain of 2.62 per cent. Experts say the stock can now stage a &ldquo;relief rally&rdquo; as the auditor hasn&rsquo;t come down as hard on it.<br /> <br /> Reliance said it could not comment on the final audit findings of the CAG as it was &ldquo;yet to see the report&rdquo;.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;We reiterate that, as a contractor, we remain committed to complying with the production sharing contract provisions and procedures, including adopting good international petroleum industry practices in our operations,&rdquo; it said.<br /> <br /> <em>Profit-sharing logic<br /> </em><br /> The CAG questioned the slabs for profit sharing between the operator and the government. It contended that these slabs were structured in such a way that the government&rsquo;s share of profit petroleum would go down if the capital intensity of the project increased.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;In view of the adverse impact of the profit-sharing mechanism in protecting government&rsquo;s interest, designed in the 1990s, there does seem to be enough ground to revisit the formula,&rdquo; CAG said.<br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 9 September, 2011, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1110909/jsp/business/story_14484602.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'auditor-raps-govt-role-in-kg-9960', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 9960, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 9851 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Auditor raps govt role in KG' $metaKeywords = 'Comptroller and Auditor-General,CAG' $metaDesc = ' -The Telegraph &nbsp; The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) has slammed the petroleum ministry for failing to take back 25 per cent of the acreage of the KG-D6 oil and gas block off the Andhra coast from Reliance Industries after it reneged...' $disp = '<p>-The Telegraph</p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) has slammed the petroleum ministry for failing to take back 25 per cent of the acreage of the KG-D6 oil and gas block off the Andhra coast from Reliance Industries after it reneged on its drilling obligations.<br /><br />The long-awaited report from the CAG based on a detailed performance audit of the country&rsquo;s hydrocarbon production sharing contracts was tabled in Parliament today.<br /><br />The nation&rsquo;s auditor surprisingly did not comment on the bigger charge against Reliance Industries that it had &ldquo;gold-plated&rdquo; development costs at India&rsquo;s only commercially-operated deepwater gasfield to depress the government&rsquo;s share of profit petroleum from the gasfield.<br /><br />The CAG did not say whether the approval by the upstream regulator &mdash; the directorate general of hydrocarbons &mdash; of RIL&rsquo;s plan to raise the development cost from $2.4 billion in 2004 to $8.8 billion in 2006 was justified or not.<br /><br />All that the CAG said was that the &ldquo;approval of estimates does not constitute acceptance of the project costs,&rdquo; suggesting that this could be done only after a thorough audit of the actual costs incurred.<br /><br />The report did, however, express some reservations about the hike in development costs. It said that with gas output from KG-D6 plunging to about 43 million standard cubic metres per day (mmscmd) &mdash; which is close to the 40 mmscmd output level envisaged in the 2004 investment plan &mdash; doubts could be raised about &ldquo;whether the upgradation to 80mmscmd with substantial increase in the development cost (to $8.8 billion) was justified&rdquo;.<br /><br />The report blamed the petroleum ministry and the DGH for allowing Reliance to retain the entire 7,645 sq km KG-DWN-98/3 (KG-D6) block in the Bay of Bengal after the giant Dhirubhai-1 and 3 gas finds were made in 2001. The report said if the penal provisions of the production-sharing contract (PSC) had been enforced, Reliance would have had to relinquish 25 per cent of the total area outside the discoveries in June 2004 and 2005.<br /><br />The petroleum ministry had declared the entire block as a &ldquo;discovery area&rdquo; and allowed the company to retain it.<br /><br />&ldquo;We recommend that the ministry of petroleum and natural gas should review the determination of the entire contract area as &lsquo;discovery area&rsquo; strictly in terms of the PSC provisions&hellip;.delineation of the discovery area and relinquishment of the rest (by RIL),&rdquo; the report said.<br /><br />Reliance had committed to drill 22 wells in KG-D6 in fiscal 2011. However, the company had drilled 20 wells in the D1 and D3 areas. Of these, only 18 are in production, and petroleum experts say this is one of the main reasons for the sharp decline in the gas production from the field to about 43 mmscmd from 61.5 mmscmd.<br /><br />India&rsquo;s only deepwater block that started commercial production two years ago was supposed to raise production to 69 mmscmd by April.<br /><br /><em>RIL stock surge<br /></em><br />The RIL stock surged after market mavens realised that the CAG report wasn&rsquo;t as damaging as they had feared. The stock &mdash; which has been under considerable pressure since mid-June when portions of the CAG&rsquo;s draft report were leaked to the media &mdash; soared to close at Rs 853.50, a gain of 2.62 per cent. Experts say the stock can now stage a &ldquo;relief rally&rdquo; as the auditor hasn&rsquo;t come down as hard on it.<br /><br />Reliance said it could not comment on the final audit findings of the CAG as it was &ldquo;yet to see the report&rdquo;.<br /><br />&ldquo;We reiterate that, as a contractor, we remain committed to complying with the production sharing contract provisions and procedures, including adopting good international petroleum industry practices in our operations,&rdquo; it said.<br /><br /><em>Profit-sharing logic<br /></em><br />The CAG questioned the slabs for profit sharing between the operator and the government. It contended that these slabs were structured in such a way that the government&rsquo;s share of profit petroleum would go down if the capital intensity of the project increased.<br /><br />&ldquo;In view of the adverse impact of the profit-sharing mechanism in protecting government&rsquo;s interest, designed in the 1990s, there does seem to be enough ground to revisit the formula,&rdquo; CAG said.<br /><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/auditor-raps-govt-role-in-kg-9960.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Auditor raps govt role in KG | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Telegraph The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) has slammed the petroleum ministry for failing to take back 25 per cent of the acreage of the KG-D6 oil and gas block off the Andhra coast from Reliance Industries after it reneged..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Auditor raps govt role in KG</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p>-The Telegraph</p><p> </p><div align="justify">The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) has slammed the petroleum ministry for failing to take back 25 per cent of the acreage of the KG-D6 oil and gas block off the Andhra coast from Reliance Industries after it reneged on its drilling obligations.<br /><br />The long-awaited report from the CAG based on a detailed performance audit of the country’s hydrocarbon production sharing contracts was tabled in Parliament today.<br /><br />The nation’s auditor surprisingly did not comment on the bigger charge against Reliance Industries that it had “gold-plated” development costs at India’s only commercially-operated deepwater gasfield to depress the government’s share of profit petroleum from the gasfield.<br /><br />The CAG did not say whether the approval by the upstream regulator — the directorate general of hydrocarbons — of RIL’s plan to raise the development cost from $2.4 billion in 2004 to $8.8 billion in 2006 was justified or not.<br /><br />All that the CAG said was that the “approval of estimates does not constitute acceptance of the project costs,” suggesting that this could be done only after a thorough audit of the actual costs incurred.<br /><br />The report did, however, express some reservations about the hike in development costs. It said that with gas output from KG-D6 plunging to about 43 million standard cubic metres per day (mmscmd) — which is close to the 40 mmscmd output level envisaged in the 2004 investment plan — doubts could be raised about “whether the upgradation to 80mmscmd with substantial increase in the development cost (to $8.8 billion) was justified”.<br /><br />The report blamed the petroleum ministry and the DGH for allowing Reliance to retain the entire 7,645 sq km KG-DWN-98/3 (KG-D6) block in the Bay of Bengal after the giant Dhirubhai-1 and 3 gas finds were made in 2001. The report said if the penal provisions of the production-sharing contract (PSC) had been enforced, Reliance would have had to relinquish 25 per cent of the total area outside the discoveries in June 2004 and 2005.<br /><br />The petroleum ministry had declared the entire block as a “discovery area” and allowed the company to retain it.<br /><br />“We recommend that the ministry of petroleum and natural gas should review the determination of the entire contract area as ‘discovery area’ strictly in terms of the PSC provisions….delineation of the discovery area and relinquishment of the rest (by RIL),” the report said.<br /><br />Reliance had committed to drill 22 wells in KG-D6 in fiscal 2011. However, the company had drilled 20 wells in the D1 and D3 areas. Of these, only 18 are in production, and petroleum experts say this is one of the main reasons for the sharp decline in the gas production from the field to about 43 mmscmd from 61.5 mmscmd.<br /><br />India’s only deepwater block that started commercial production two years ago was supposed to raise production to 69 mmscmd by April.<br /><br /><em>RIL stock surge<br /></em><br />The RIL stock surged after market mavens realised that the CAG report wasn’t as damaging as they had feared. The stock — which has been under considerable pressure since mid-June when portions of the CAG’s draft report were leaked to the media — soared to close at Rs 853.50, a gain of 2.62 per cent. Experts say the stock can now stage a “relief rally” as the auditor hasn’t come down as hard on it.<br /><br />Reliance said it could not comment on the final audit findings of the CAG as it was “yet to see the report”.<br /><br />“We reiterate that, as a contractor, we remain committed to complying with the production sharing contract provisions and procedures, including adopting good international petroleum industry practices in our operations,” it said.<br /><br /><em>Profit-sharing logic<br /></em><br />The CAG questioned the slabs for profit sharing between the operator and the government. It contended that these slabs were structured in such a way that the government’s share of profit petroleum would go down if the capital intensity of the project increased.<br /><br />“In view of the adverse impact of the profit-sharing mechanism in protecting government’s interest, designed in the 1990s, there does seem to be enough ground to revisit the formula,” CAG said.<br /><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f698dd26bef-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f698dd26bef-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f698dd26bef-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f698dd26bef-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f698dd26bef-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f698dd26bef-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f698dd26bef-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f698dd26bef-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f698dd26bef-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 9851, 'title' => 'Auditor raps govt role in KG', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p> -The Telegraph </p> <p> &nbsp; </p> <div align="justify"> The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) has slammed the petroleum ministry for failing to take back 25 per cent of the acreage of the KG-D6 oil and gas block off the Andhra coast from Reliance Industries after it reneged on its drilling obligations.<br /> <br /> The long-awaited report from the CAG based on a detailed performance audit of the country&rsquo;s hydrocarbon production sharing contracts was tabled in Parliament today.<br /> <br /> The nation&rsquo;s auditor surprisingly did not comment on the bigger charge against Reliance Industries that it had &ldquo;gold-plated&rdquo; development costs at India&rsquo;s only commercially-operated deepwater gasfield to depress the government&rsquo;s share of profit petroleum from the gasfield.<br /> <br /> The CAG did not say whether the approval by the upstream regulator &mdash; the directorate general of hydrocarbons &mdash; of RIL&rsquo;s plan to raise the development cost from $2.4 billion in 2004 to $8.8 billion in 2006 was justified or not.<br /> <br /> All that the CAG said was that the &ldquo;approval of estimates does not constitute acceptance of the project costs,&rdquo; suggesting that this could be done only after a thorough audit of the actual costs incurred.<br /> <br /> The report did, however, express some reservations about the hike in development costs. It said that with gas output from KG-D6 plunging to about 43 million standard cubic metres per day (mmscmd) &mdash; which is close to the 40 mmscmd output level envisaged in the 2004 investment plan &mdash; doubts could be raised about &ldquo;whether the upgradation to 80mmscmd with substantial increase in the development cost (to $8.8 billion) was justified&rdquo;.<br /> <br /> The report blamed the petroleum ministry and the DGH for allowing Reliance to retain the entire 7,645 sq km KG-DWN-98/3 (KG-D6) block in the Bay of Bengal after the giant Dhirubhai-1 and 3 gas finds were made in 2001. The report said if the penal provisions of the production-sharing contract (PSC) had been enforced, Reliance would have had to relinquish 25 per cent of the total area outside the discoveries in June 2004 and 2005.<br /> <br /> The petroleum ministry had declared the entire block as a &ldquo;discovery area&rdquo; and allowed the company to retain it.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;We recommend that the ministry of petroleum and natural gas should review the determination of the entire contract area as &lsquo;discovery area&rsquo; strictly in terms of the PSC provisions&hellip;.delineation of the discovery area and relinquishment of the rest (by RIL),&rdquo; the report said.<br /> <br /> Reliance had committed to drill 22 wells in KG-D6 in fiscal 2011. However, the company had drilled 20 wells in the D1 and D3 areas. Of these, only 18 are in production, and petroleum experts say this is one of the main reasons for the sharp decline in the gas production from the field to about 43 mmscmd from 61.5 mmscmd.<br /> <br /> India&rsquo;s only deepwater block that started commercial production two years ago was supposed to raise production to 69 mmscmd by April.<br /> <br /> <em>RIL stock surge<br /> </em><br /> The RIL stock surged after market mavens realised that the CAG report wasn&rsquo;t as damaging as they had feared. The stock &mdash; which has been under considerable pressure since mid-June when portions of the CAG&rsquo;s draft report were leaked to the media &mdash; soared to close at Rs 853.50, a gain of 2.62 per cent. Experts say the stock can now stage a &ldquo;relief rally&rdquo; as the auditor hasn&rsquo;t come down as hard on it.<br /> <br /> Reliance said it could not comment on the final audit findings of the CAG as it was &ldquo;yet to see the report&rdquo;.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;We reiterate that, as a contractor, we remain committed to complying with the production sharing contract provisions and procedures, including adopting good international petroleum industry practices in our operations,&rdquo; it said.<br /> <br /> <em>Profit-sharing logic<br /> </em><br /> The CAG questioned the slabs for profit sharing between the operator and the government. It contended that these slabs were structured in such a way that the government&rsquo;s share of profit petroleum would go down if the capital intensity of the project increased.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;In view of the adverse impact of the profit-sharing mechanism in protecting government&rsquo;s interest, designed in the 1990s, there does seem to be enough ground to revisit the formula,&rdquo; CAG said.<br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 9 September, 2011, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1110909/jsp/business/story_14484602.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'auditor-raps-govt-role-in-kg-9960', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 9960, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 9851, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Auditor raps govt role in KG', 'metaKeywords' => 'Comptroller and Auditor-General,CAG', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Telegraph &nbsp; The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) has slammed the petroleum ministry for failing to take back 25 per cent of the acreage of the KG-D6 oil and gas block off the Andhra coast from Reliance Industries after it reneged...', 'disp' => '<p>-The Telegraph</p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) has slammed the petroleum ministry for failing to take back 25 per cent of the acreage of the KG-D6 oil and gas block off the Andhra coast from Reliance Industries after it reneged on its drilling obligations.<br /><br />The long-awaited report from the CAG based on a detailed performance audit of the country&rsquo;s hydrocarbon production sharing contracts was tabled in Parliament today.<br /><br />The nation&rsquo;s auditor surprisingly did not comment on the bigger charge against Reliance Industries that it had &ldquo;gold-plated&rdquo; development costs at India&rsquo;s only commercially-operated deepwater gasfield to depress the government&rsquo;s share of profit petroleum from the gasfield.<br /><br />The CAG did not say whether the approval by the upstream regulator &mdash; the directorate general of hydrocarbons &mdash; of RIL&rsquo;s plan to raise the development cost from $2.4 billion in 2004 to $8.8 billion in 2006 was justified or not.<br /><br />All that the CAG said was that the &ldquo;approval of estimates does not constitute acceptance of the project costs,&rdquo; suggesting that this could be done only after a thorough audit of the actual costs incurred.<br /><br />The report did, however, express some reservations about the hike in development costs. It said that with gas output from KG-D6 plunging to about 43 million standard cubic metres per day (mmscmd) &mdash; which is close to the 40 mmscmd output level envisaged in the 2004 investment plan &mdash; doubts could be raised about &ldquo;whether the upgradation to 80mmscmd with substantial increase in the development cost (to $8.8 billion) was justified&rdquo;.<br /><br />The report blamed the petroleum ministry and the DGH for allowing Reliance to retain the entire 7,645 sq km KG-DWN-98/3 (KG-D6) block in the Bay of Bengal after the giant Dhirubhai-1 and 3 gas finds were made in 2001. The report said if the penal provisions of the production-sharing contract (PSC) had been enforced, Reliance would have had to relinquish 25 per cent of the total area outside the discoveries in June 2004 and 2005.<br /><br />The petroleum ministry had declared the entire block as a &ldquo;discovery area&rdquo; and allowed the company to retain it.<br /><br />&ldquo;We recommend that the ministry of petroleum and natural gas should review the determination of the entire contract area as &lsquo;discovery area&rsquo; strictly in terms of the PSC provisions&hellip;.delineation of the discovery area and relinquishment of the rest (by RIL),&rdquo; the report said.<br /><br />Reliance had committed to drill 22 wells in KG-D6 in fiscal 2011. However, the company had drilled 20 wells in the D1 and D3 areas. Of these, only 18 are in production, and petroleum experts say this is one of the main reasons for the sharp decline in the gas production from the field to about 43 mmscmd from 61.5 mmscmd.<br /><br />India&rsquo;s only deepwater block that started commercial production two years ago was supposed to raise production to 69 mmscmd by April.<br /><br /><em>RIL stock surge<br /></em><br />The RIL stock surged after market mavens realised that the CAG report wasn&rsquo;t as damaging as they had feared. The stock &mdash; which has been under considerable pressure since mid-June when portions of the CAG&rsquo;s draft report were leaked to the media &mdash; soared to close at Rs 853.50, a gain of 2.62 per cent. Experts say the stock can now stage a &ldquo;relief rally&rdquo; as the auditor hasn&rsquo;t come down as hard on it.<br /><br />Reliance said it could not comment on the final audit findings of the CAG as it was &ldquo;yet to see the report&rdquo;.<br /><br />&ldquo;We reiterate that, as a contractor, we remain committed to complying with the production sharing contract provisions and procedures, including adopting good international petroleum industry practices in our operations,&rdquo; it said.<br /><br /><em>Profit-sharing logic<br /></em><br />The CAG questioned the slabs for profit sharing between the operator and the government. It contended that these slabs were structured in such a way that the government&rsquo;s share of profit petroleum would go down if the capital intensity of the project increased.<br /><br />&ldquo;In view of the adverse impact of the profit-sharing mechanism in protecting government&rsquo;s interest, designed in the 1990s, there does seem to be enough ground to revisit the formula,&rdquo; CAG said.<br /><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 9851, 'title' => 'Auditor raps govt role in KG', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p> -The Telegraph </p> <p> &nbsp; </p> <div align="justify"> The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) has slammed the petroleum ministry for failing to take back 25 per cent of the acreage of the KG-D6 oil and gas block off the Andhra coast from Reliance Industries after it reneged on its drilling obligations.<br /> <br /> The long-awaited report from the CAG based on a detailed performance audit of the country&rsquo;s hydrocarbon production sharing contracts was tabled in Parliament today.<br /> <br /> The nation&rsquo;s auditor surprisingly did not comment on the bigger charge against Reliance Industries that it had &ldquo;gold-plated&rdquo; development costs at India&rsquo;s only commercially-operated deepwater gasfield to depress the government&rsquo;s share of profit petroleum from the gasfield.<br /> <br /> The CAG did not say whether the approval by the upstream regulator &mdash; the directorate general of hydrocarbons &mdash; of RIL&rsquo;s plan to raise the development cost from $2.4 billion in 2004 to $8.8 billion in 2006 was justified or not.<br /> <br /> All that the CAG said was that the &ldquo;approval of estimates does not constitute acceptance of the project costs,&rdquo; suggesting that this could be done only after a thorough audit of the actual costs incurred.<br /> <br /> The report did, however, express some reservations about the hike in development costs. It said that with gas output from KG-D6 plunging to about 43 million standard cubic metres per day (mmscmd) &mdash; which is close to the 40 mmscmd output level envisaged in the 2004 investment plan &mdash; doubts could be raised about &ldquo;whether the upgradation to 80mmscmd with substantial increase in the development cost (to $8.8 billion) was justified&rdquo;.<br /> <br /> The report blamed the petroleum ministry and the DGH for allowing Reliance to retain the entire 7,645 sq km KG-DWN-98/3 (KG-D6) block in the Bay of Bengal after the giant Dhirubhai-1 and 3 gas finds were made in 2001. The report said if the penal provisions of the production-sharing contract (PSC) had been enforced, Reliance would have had to relinquish 25 per cent of the total area outside the discoveries in June 2004 and 2005.<br /> <br /> The petroleum ministry had declared the entire block as a &ldquo;discovery area&rdquo; and allowed the company to retain it.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;We recommend that the ministry of petroleum and natural gas should review the determination of the entire contract area as &lsquo;discovery area&rsquo; strictly in terms of the PSC provisions&hellip;.delineation of the discovery area and relinquishment of the rest (by RIL),&rdquo; the report said.<br /> <br /> Reliance had committed to drill 22 wells in KG-D6 in fiscal 2011. However, the company had drilled 20 wells in the D1 and D3 areas. Of these, only 18 are in production, and petroleum experts say this is one of the main reasons for the sharp decline in the gas production from the field to about 43 mmscmd from 61.5 mmscmd.<br /> <br /> India&rsquo;s only deepwater block that started commercial production two years ago was supposed to raise production to 69 mmscmd by April.<br /> <br /> <em>RIL stock surge<br /> </em><br /> The RIL stock surged after market mavens realised that the CAG report wasn&rsquo;t as damaging as they had feared. The stock &mdash; which has been under considerable pressure since mid-June when portions of the CAG&rsquo;s draft report were leaked to the media &mdash; soared to close at Rs 853.50, a gain of 2.62 per cent. Experts say the stock can now stage a &ldquo;relief rally&rdquo; as the auditor hasn&rsquo;t come down as hard on it.<br /> <br /> Reliance said it could not comment on the final audit findings of the CAG as it was &ldquo;yet to see the report&rdquo;.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;We reiterate that, as a contractor, we remain committed to complying with the production sharing contract provisions and procedures, including adopting good international petroleum industry practices in our operations,&rdquo; it said.<br /> <br /> <em>Profit-sharing logic<br /> </em><br /> The CAG questioned the slabs for profit sharing between the operator and the government. It contended that these slabs were structured in such a way that the government&rsquo;s share of profit petroleum would go down if the capital intensity of the project increased.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;In view of the adverse impact of the profit-sharing mechanism in protecting government&rsquo;s interest, designed in the 1990s, there does seem to be enough ground to revisit the formula,&rdquo; CAG said.<br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 9 September, 2011, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1110909/jsp/business/story_14484602.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'auditor-raps-govt-role-in-kg-9960', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 9960, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 9851 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Auditor raps govt role in KG' $metaKeywords = 'Comptroller and Auditor-General,CAG' $metaDesc = ' -The Telegraph &nbsp; The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) has slammed the petroleum ministry for failing to take back 25 per cent of the acreage of the KG-D6 oil and gas block off the Andhra coast from Reliance Industries after it reneged...' $disp = '<p>-The Telegraph</p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) has slammed the petroleum ministry for failing to take back 25 per cent of the acreage of the KG-D6 oil and gas block off the Andhra coast from Reliance Industries after it reneged on its drilling obligations.<br /><br />The long-awaited report from the CAG based on a detailed performance audit of the country&rsquo;s hydrocarbon production sharing contracts was tabled in Parliament today.<br /><br />The nation&rsquo;s auditor surprisingly did not comment on the bigger charge against Reliance Industries that it had &ldquo;gold-plated&rdquo; development costs at India&rsquo;s only commercially-operated deepwater gasfield to depress the government&rsquo;s share of profit petroleum from the gasfield.<br /><br />The CAG did not say whether the approval by the upstream regulator &mdash; the directorate general of hydrocarbons &mdash; of RIL&rsquo;s plan to raise the development cost from $2.4 billion in 2004 to $8.8 billion in 2006 was justified or not.<br /><br />All that the CAG said was that the &ldquo;approval of estimates does not constitute acceptance of the project costs,&rdquo; suggesting that this could be done only after a thorough audit of the actual costs incurred.<br /><br />The report did, however, express some reservations about the hike in development costs. It said that with gas output from KG-D6 plunging to about 43 million standard cubic metres per day (mmscmd) &mdash; which is close to the 40 mmscmd output level envisaged in the 2004 investment plan &mdash; doubts could be raised about &ldquo;whether the upgradation to 80mmscmd with substantial increase in the development cost (to $8.8 billion) was justified&rdquo;.<br /><br />The report blamed the petroleum ministry and the DGH for allowing Reliance to retain the entire 7,645 sq km KG-DWN-98/3 (KG-D6) block in the Bay of Bengal after the giant Dhirubhai-1 and 3 gas finds were made in 2001. The report said if the penal provisions of the production-sharing contract (PSC) had been enforced, Reliance would have had to relinquish 25 per cent of the total area outside the discoveries in June 2004 and 2005.<br /><br />The petroleum ministry had declared the entire block as a &ldquo;discovery area&rdquo; and allowed the company to retain it.<br /><br />&ldquo;We recommend that the ministry of petroleum and natural gas should review the determination of the entire contract area as &lsquo;discovery area&rsquo; strictly in terms of the PSC provisions&hellip;.delineation of the discovery area and relinquishment of the rest (by RIL),&rdquo; the report said.<br /><br />Reliance had committed to drill 22 wells in KG-D6 in fiscal 2011. However, the company had drilled 20 wells in the D1 and D3 areas. Of these, only 18 are in production, and petroleum experts say this is one of the main reasons for the sharp decline in the gas production from the field to about 43 mmscmd from 61.5 mmscmd.<br /><br />India&rsquo;s only deepwater block that started commercial production two years ago was supposed to raise production to 69 mmscmd by April.<br /><br /><em>RIL stock surge<br /></em><br />The RIL stock surged after market mavens realised that the CAG report wasn&rsquo;t as damaging as they had feared. The stock &mdash; which has been under considerable pressure since mid-June when portions of the CAG&rsquo;s draft report were leaked to the media &mdash; soared to close at Rs 853.50, a gain of 2.62 per cent. Experts say the stock can now stage a &ldquo;relief rally&rdquo; as the auditor hasn&rsquo;t come down as hard on it.<br /><br />Reliance said it could not comment on the final audit findings of the CAG as it was &ldquo;yet to see the report&rdquo;.<br /><br />&ldquo;We reiterate that, as a contractor, we remain committed to complying with the production sharing contract provisions and procedures, including adopting good international petroleum industry practices in our operations,&rdquo; it said.<br /><br /><em>Profit-sharing logic<br /></em><br />The CAG questioned the slabs for profit sharing between the operator and the government. It contended that these slabs were structured in such a way that the government&rsquo;s share of profit petroleum would go down if the capital intensity of the project increased.<br /><br />&ldquo;In view of the adverse impact of the profit-sharing mechanism in protecting government&rsquo;s interest, designed in the 1990s, there does seem to be enough ground to revisit the formula,&rdquo; CAG said.<br /><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/auditor-raps-govt-role-in-kg-9960.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Auditor raps govt role in KG | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Telegraph The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) has slammed the petroleum ministry for failing to take back 25 per cent of the acreage of the KG-D6 oil and gas block off the Andhra coast from Reliance Industries after it reneged..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Auditor raps govt role in KG</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p>-The Telegraph</p><p> </p><div align="justify">The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) has slammed the petroleum ministry for failing to take back 25 per cent of the acreage of the KG-D6 oil and gas block off the Andhra coast from Reliance Industries after it reneged on its drilling obligations.<br /><br />The long-awaited report from the CAG based on a detailed performance audit of the country’s hydrocarbon production sharing contracts was tabled in Parliament today.<br /><br />The nation’s auditor surprisingly did not comment on the bigger charge against Reliance Industries that it had “gold-plated” development costs at India’s only commercially-operated deepwater gasfield to depress the government’s share of profit petroleum from the gasfield.<br /><br />The CAG did not say whether the approval by the upstream regulator — the directorate general of hydrocarbons — of RIL’s plan to raise the development cost from $2.4 billion in 2004 to $8.8 billion in 2006 was justified or not.<br /><br />All that the CAG said was that the “approval of estimates does not constitute acceptance of the project costs,” suggesting that this could be done only after a thorough audit of the actual costs incurred.<br /><br />The report did, however, express some reservations about the hike in development costs. It said that with gas output from KG-D6 plunging to about 43 million standard cubic metres per day (mmscmd) — which is close to the 40 mmscmd output level envisaged in the 2004 investment plan — doubts could be raised about “whether the upgradation to 80mmscmd with substantial increase in the development cost (to $8.8 billion) was justified”.<br /><br />The report blamed the petroleum ministry and the DGH for allowing Reliance to retain the entire 7,645 sq km KG-DWN-98/3 (KG-D6) block in the Bay of Bengal after the giant Dhirubhai-1 and 3 gas finds were made in 2001. The report said if the penal provisions of the production-sharing contract (PSC) had been enforced, Reliance would have had to relinquish 25 per cent of the total area outside the discoveries in June 2004 and 2005.<br /><br />The petroleum ministry had declared the entire block as a “discovery area” and allowed the company to retain it.<br /><br />“We recommend that the ministry of petroleum and natural gas should review the determination of the entire contract area as ‘discovery area’ strictly in terms of the PSC provisions….delineation of the discovery area and relinquishment of the rest (by RIL),” the report said.<br /><br />Reliance had committed to drill 22 wells in KG-D6 in fiscal 2011. However, the company had drilled 20 wells in the D1 and D3 areas. Of these, only 18 are in production, and petroleum experts say this is one of the main reasons for the sharp decline in the gas production from the field to about 43 mmscmd from 61.5 mmscmd.<br /><br />India’s only deepwater block that started commercial production two years ago was supposed to raise production to 69 mmscmd by April.<br /><br /><em>RIL stock surge<br /></em><br />The RIL stock surged after market mavens realised that the CAG report wasn’t as damaging as they had feared. The stock — which has been under considerable pressure since mid-June when portions of the CAG’s draft report were leaked to the media — soared to close at Rs 853.50, a gain of 2.62 per cent. Experts say the stock can now stage a “relief rally” as the auditor hasn’t come down as hard on it.<br /><br />Reliance said it could not comment on the final audit findings of the CAG as it was “yet to see the report”.<br /><br />“We reiterate that, as a contractor, we remain committed to complying with the production sharing contract provisions and procedures, including adopting good international petroleum industry practices in our operations,” it said.<br /><br /><em>Profit-sharing logic<br /></em><br />The CAG questioned the slabs for profit sharing between the operator and the government. It contended that these slabs were structured in such a way that the government’s share of profit petroleum would go down if the capital intensity of the project increased.<br /><br />“In view of the adverse impact of the profit-sharing mechanism in protecting government’s interest, designed in the 1990s, there does seem to be enough ground to revisit the formula,” CAG said.<br /><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f698dd26bef-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f698dd26bef-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f698dd26bef-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f698dd26bef-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f698dd26bef-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f698dd26bef-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f698dd26bef-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f698dd26bef-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f698dd26bef-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 9851, 'title' => 'Auditor raps govt role in KG', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p> -The Telegraph </p> <p> &nbsp; </p> <div align="justify"> The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) has slammed the petroleum ministry for failing to take back 25 per cent of the acreage of the KG-D6 oil and gas block off the Andhra coast from Reliance Industries after it reneged on its drilling obligations.<br /> <br /> The long-awaited report from the CAG based on a detailed performance audit of the country&rsquo;s hydrocarbon production sharing contracts was tabled in Parliament today.<br /> <br /> The nation&rsquo;s auditor surprisingly did not comment on the bigger charge against Reliance Industries that it had &ldquo;gold-plated&rdquo; development costs at India&rsquo;s only commercially-operated deepwater gasfield to depress the government&rsquo;s share of profit petroleum from the gasfield.<br /> <br /> The CAG did not say whether the approval by the upstream regulator &mdash; the directorate general of hydrocarbons &mdash; of RIL&rsquo;s plan to raise the development cost from $2.4 billion in 2004 to $8.8 billion in 2006 was justified or not.<br /> <br /> All that the CAG said was that the &ldquo;approval of estimates does not constitute acceptance of the project costs,&rdquo; suggesting that this could be done only after a thorough audit of the actual costs incurred.<br /> <br /> The report did, however, express some reservations about the hike in development costs. It said that with gas output from KG-D6 plunging to about 43 million standard cubic metres per day (mmscmd) &mdash; which is close to the 40 mmscmd output level envisaged in the 2004 investment plan &mdash; doubts could be raised about &ldquo;whether the upgradation to 80mmscmd with substantial increase in the development cost (to $8.8 billion) was justified&rdquo;.<br /> <br /> The report blamed the petroleum ministry and the DGH for allowing Reliance to retain the entire 7,645 sq km KG-DWN-98/3 (KG-D6) block in the Bay of Bengal after the giant Dhirubhai-1 and 3 gas finds were made in 2001. The report said if the penal provisions of the production-sharing contract (PSC) had been enforced, Reliance would have had to relinquish 25 per cent of the total area outside the discoveries in June 2004 and 2005.<br /> <br /> The petroleum ministry had declared the entire block as a &ldquo;discovery area&rdquo; and allowed the company to retain it.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;We recommend that the ministry of petroleum and natural gas should review the determination of the entire contract area as &lsquo;discovery area&rsquo; strictly in terms of the PSC provisions&hellip;.delineation of the discovery area and relinquishment of the rest (by RIL),&rdquo; the report said.<br /> <br /> Reliance had committed to drill 22 wells in KG-D6 in fiscal 2011. However, the company had drilled 20 wells in the D1 and D3 areas. Of these, only 18 are in production, and petroleum experts say this is one of the main reasons for the sharp decline in the gas production from the field to about 43 mmscmd from 61.5 mmscmd.<br /> <br /> India&rsquo;s only deepwater block that started commercial production two years ago was supposed to raise production to 69 mmscmd by April.<br /> <br /> <em>RIL stock surge<br /> </em><br /> The RIL stock surged after market mavens realised that the CAG report wasn&rsquo;t as damaging as they had feared. The stock &mdash; which has been under considerable pressure since mid-June when portions of the CAG&rsquo;s draft report were leaked to the media &mdash; soared to close at Rs 853.50, a gain of 2.62 per cent. Experts say the stock can now stage a &ldquo;relief rally&rdquo; as the auditor hasn&rsquo;t come down as hard on it.<br /> <br /> Reliance said it could not comment on the final audit findings of the CAG as it was &ldquo;yet to see the report&rdquo;.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;We reiterate that, as a contractor, we remain committed to complying with the production sharing contract provisions and procedures, including adopting good international petroleum industry practices in our operations,&rdquo; it said.<br /> <br /> <em>Profit-sharing logic<br /> </em><br /> The CAG questioned the slabs for profit sharing between the operator and the government. It contended that these slabs were structured in such a way that the government&rsquo;s share of profit petroleum would go down if the capital intensity of the project increased.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;In view of the adverse impact of the profit-sharing mechanism in protecting government&rsquo;s interest, designed in the 1990s, there does seem to be enough ground to revisit the formula,&rdquo; CAG said.<br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 9 September, 2011, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1110909/jsp/business/story_14484602.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'auditor-raps-govt-role-in-kg-9960', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 9960, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 9851, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Auditor raps govt role in KG', 'metaKeywords' => 'Comptroller and Auditor-General,CAG', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Telegraph &nbsp; The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) has slammed the petroleum ministry for failing to take back 25 per cent of the acreage of the KG-D6 oil and gas block off the Andhra coast from Reliance Industries after it reneged...', 'disp' => '<p>-The Telegraph</p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) has slammed the petroleum ministry for failing to take back 25 per cent of the acreage of the KG-D6 oil and gas block off the Andhra coast from Reliance Industries after it reneged on its drilling obligations.<br /><br />The long-awaited report from the CAG based on a detailed performance audit of the country&rsquo;s hydrocarbon production sharing contracts was tabled in Parliament today.<br /><br />The nation&rsquo;s auditor surprisingly did not comment on the bigger charge against Reliance Industries that it had &ldquo;gold-plated&rdquo; development costs at India&rsquo;s only commercially-operated deepwater gasfield to depress the government&rsquo;s share of profit petroleum from the gasfield.<br /><br />The CAG did not say whether the approval by the upstream regulator &mdash; the directorate general of hydrocarbons &mdash; of RIL&rsquo;s plan to raise the development cost from $2.4 billion in 2004 to $8.8 billion in 2006 was justified or not.<br /><br />All that the CAG said was that the &ldquo;approval of estimates does not constitute acceptance of the project costs,&rdquo; suggesting that this could be done only after a thorough audit of the actual costs incurred.<br /><br />The report did, however, express some reservations about the hike in development costs. It said that with gas output from KG-D6 plunging to about 43 million standard cubic metres per day (mmscmd) &mdash; which is close to the 40 mmscmd output level envisaged in the 2004 investment plan &mdash; doubts could be raised about &ldquo;whether the upgradation to 80mmscmd with substantial increase in the development cost (to $8.8 billion) was justified&rdquo;.<br /><br />The report blamed the petroleum ministry and the DGH for allowing Reliance to retain the entire 7,645 sq km KG-DWN-98/3 (KG-D6) block in the Bay of Bengal after the giant Dhirubhai-1 and 3 gas finds were made in 2001. The report said if the penal provisions of the production-sharing contract (PSC) had been enforced, Reliance would have had to relinquish 25 per cent of the total area outside the discoveries in June 2004 and 2005.<br /><br />The petroleum ministry had declared the entire block as a &ldquo;discovery area&rdquo; and allowed the company to retain it.<br /><br />&ldquo;We recommend that the ministry of petroleum and natural gas should review the determination of the entire contract area as &lsquo;discovery area&rsquo; strictly in terms of the PSC provisions&hellip;.delineation of the discovery area and relinquishment of the rest (by RIL),&rdquo; the report said.<br /><br />Reliance had committed to drill 22 wells in KG-D6 in fiscal 2011. However, the company had drilled 20 wells in the D1 and D3 areas. Of these, only 18 are in production, and petroleum experts say this is one of the main reasons for the sharp decline in the gas production from the field to about 43 mmscmd from 61.5 mmscmd.<br /><br />India&rsquo;s only deepwater block that started commercial production two years ago was supposed to raise production to 69 mmscmd by April.<br /><br /><em>RIL stock surge<br /></em><br />The RIL stock surged after market mavens realised that the CAG report wasn&rsquo;t as damaging as they had feared. The stock &mdash; which has been under considerable pressure since mid-June when portions of the CAG&rsquo;s draft report were leaked to the media &mdash; soared to close at Rs 853.50, a gain of 2.62 per cent. Experts say the stock can now stage a &ldquo;relief rally&rdquo; as the auditor hasn&rsquo;t come down as hard on it.<br /><br />Reliance said it could not comment on the final audit findings of the CAG as it was &ldquo;yet to see the report&rdquo;.<br /><br />&ldquo;We reiterate that, as a contractor, we remain committed to complying with the production sharing contract provisions and procedures, including adopting good international petroleum industry practices in our operations,&rdquo; it said.<br /><br /><em>Profit-sharing logic<br /></em><br />The CAG questioned the slabs for profit sharing between the operator and the government. It contended that these slabs were structured in such a way that the government&rsquo;s share of profit petroleum would go down if the capital intensity of the project increased.<br /><br />&ldquo;In view of the adverse impact of the profit-sharing mechanism in protecting government&rsquo;s interest, designed in the 1990s, there does seem to be enough ground to revisit the formula,&rdquo; CAG said.<br /><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 9851, 'title' => 'Auditor raps govt role in KG', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p> -The Telegraph </p> <p> &nbsp; </p> <div align="justify"> The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) has slammed the petroleum ministry for failing to take back 25 per cent of the acreage of the KG-D6 oil and gas block off the Andhra coast from Reliance Industries after it reneged on its drilling obligations.<br /> <br /> The long-awaited report from the CAG based on a detailed performance audit of the country&rsquo;s hydrocarbon production sharing contracts was tabled in Parliament today.<br /> <br /> The nation&rsquo;s auditor surprisingly did not comment on the bigger charge against Reliance Industries that it had &ldquo;gold-plated&rdquo; development costs at India&rsquo;s only commercially-operated deepwater gasfield to depress the government&rsquo;s share of profit petroleum from the gasfield.<br /> <br /> The CAG did not say whether the approval by the upstream regulator &mdash; the directorate general of hydrocarbons &mdash; of RIL&rsquo;s plan to raise the development cost from $2.4 billion in 2004 to $8.8 billion in 2006 was justified or not.<br /> <br /> All that the CAG said was that the &ldquo;approval of estimates does not constitute acceptance of the project costs,&rdquo; suggesting that this could be done only after a thorough audit of the actual costs incurred.<br /> <br /> The report did, however, express some reservations about the hike in development costs. It said that with gas output from KG-D6 plunging to about 43 million standard cubic metres per day (mmscmd) &mdash; which is close to the 40 mmscmd output level envisaged in the 2004 investment plan &mdash; doubts could be raised about &ldquo;whether the upgradation to 80mmscmd with substantial increase in the development cost (to $8.8 billion) was justified&rdquo;.<br /> <br /> The report blamed the petroleum ministry and the DGH for allowing Reliance to retain the entire 7,645 sq km KG-DWN-98/3 (KG-D6) block in the Bay of Bengal after the giant Dhirubhai-1 and 3 gas finds were made in 2001. The report said if the penal provisions of the production-sharing contract (PSC) had been enforced, Reliance would have had to relinquish 25 per cent of the total area outside the discoveries in June 2004 and 2005.<br /> <br /> The petroleum ministry had declared the entire block as a &ldquo;discovery area&rdquo; and allowed the company to retain it.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;We recommend that the ministry of petroleum and natural gas should review the determination of the entire contract area as &lsquo;discovery area&rsquo; strictly in terms of the PSC provisions&hellip;.delineation of the discovery area and relinquishment of the rest (by RIL),&rdquo; the report said.<br /> <br /> Reliance had committed to drill 22 wells in KG-D6 in fiscal 2011. However, the company had drilled 20 wells in the D1 and D3 areas. Of these, only 18 are in production, and petroleum experts say this is one of the main reasons for the sharp decline in the gas production from the field to about 43 mmscmd from 61.5 mmscmd.<br /> <br /> India&rsquo;s only deepwater block that started commercial production two years ago was supposed to raise production to 69 mmscmd by April.<br /> <br /> <em>RIL stock surge<br /> </em><br /> The RIL stock surged after market mavens realised that the CAG report wasn&rsquo;t as damaging as they had feared. The stock &mdash; which has been under considerable pressure since mid-June when portions of the CAG&rsquo;s draft report were leaked to the media &mdash; soared to close at Rs 853.50, a gain of 2.62 per cent. Experts say the stock can now stage a &ldquo;relief rally&rdquo; as the auditor hasn&rsquo;t come down as hard on it.<br /> <br /> Reliance said it could not comment on the final audit findings of the CAG as it was &ldquo;yet to see the report&rdquo;.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;We reiterate that, as a contractor, we remain committed to complying with the production sharing contract provisions and procedures, including adopting good international petroleum industry practices in our operations,&rdquo; it said.<br /> <br /> <em>Profit-sharing logic<br /> </em><br /> The CAG questioned the slabs for profit sharing between the operator and the government. It contended that these slabs were structured in such a way that the government&rsquo;s share of profit petroleum would go down if the capital intensity of the project increased.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;In view of the adverse impact of the profit-sharing mechanism in protecting government&rsquo;s interest, designed in the 1990s, there does seem to be enough ground to revisit the formula,&rdquo; CAG said.<br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 9 September, 2011, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1110909/jsp/business/story_14484602.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'auditor-raps-govt-role-in-kg-9960', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 9960, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 9851 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Auditor raps govt role in KG' $metaKeywords = 'Comptroller and Auditor-General,CAG' $metaDesc = ' -The Telegraph &nbsp; The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) has slammed the petroleum ministry for failing to take back 25 per cent of the acreage of the KG-D6 oil and gas block off the Andhra coast from Reliance Industries after it reneged...' $disp = '<p>-The Telegraph</p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) has slammed the petroleum ministry for failing to take back 25 per cent of the acreage of the KG-D6 oil and gas block off the Andhra coast from Reliance Industries after it reneged on its drilling obligations.<br /><br />The long-awaited report from the CAG based on a detailed performance audit of the country&rsquo;s hydrocarbon production sharing contracts was tabled in Parliament today.<br /><br />The nation&rsquo;s auditor surprisingly did not comment on the bigger charge against Reliance Industries that it had &ldquo;gold-plated&rdquo; development costs at India&rsquo;s only commercially-operated deepwater gasfield to depress the government&rsquo;s share of profit petroleum from the gasfield.<br /><br />The CAG did not say whether the approval by the upstream regulator &mdash; the directorate general of hydrocarbons &mdash; of RIL&rsquo;s plan to raise the development cost from $2.4 billion in 2004 to $8.8 billion in 2006 was justified or not.<br /><br />All that the CAG said was that the &ldquo;approval of estimates does not constitute acceptance of the project costs,&rdquo; suggesting that this could be done only after a thorough audit of the actual costs incurred.<br /><br />The report did, however, express some reservations about the hike in development costs. It said that with gas output from KG-D6 plunging to about 43 million standard cubic metres per day (mmscmd) &mdash; which is close to the 40 mmscmd output level envisaged in the 2004 investment plan &mdash; doubts could be raised about &ldquo;whether the upgradation to 80mmscmd with substantial increase in the development cost (to $8.8 billion) was justified&rdquo;.<br /><br />The report blamed the petroleum ministry and the DGH for allowing Reliance to retain the entire 7,645 sq km KG-DWN-98/3 (KG-D6) block in the Bay of Bengal after the giant Dhirubhai-1 and 3 gas finds were made in 2001. The report said if the penal provisions of the production-sharing contract (PSC) had been enforced, Reliance would have had to relinquish 25 per cent of the total area outside the discoveries in June 2004 and 2005.<br /><br />The petroleum ministry had declared the entire block as a &ldquo;discovery area&rdquo; and allowed the company to retain it.<br /><br />&ldquo;We recommend that the ministry of petroleum and natural gas should review the determination of the entire contract area as &lsquo;discovery area&rsquo; strictly in terms of the PSC provisions&hellip;.delineation of the discovery area and relinquishment of the rest (by RIL),&rdquo; the report said.<br /><br />Reliance had committed to drill 22 wells in KG-D6 in fiscal 2011. However, the company had drilled 20 wells in the D1 and D3 areas. Of these, only 18 are in production, and petroleum experts say this is one of the main reasons for the sharp decline in the gas production from the field to about 43 mmscmd from 61.5 mmscmd.<br /><br />India&rsquo;s only deepwater block that started commercial production two years ago was supposed to raise production to 69 mmscmd by April.<br /><br /><em>RIL stock surge<br /></em><br />The RIL stock surged after market mavens realised that the CAG report wasn&rsquo;t as damaging as they had feared. The stock &mdash; which has been under considerable pressure since mid-June when portions of the CAG&rsquo;s draft report were leaked to the media &mdash; soared to close at Rs 853.50, a gain of 2.62 per cent. Experts say the stock can now stage a &ldquo;relief rally&rdquo; as the auditor hasn&rsquo;t come down as hard on it.<br /><br />Reliance said it could not comment on the final audit findings of the CAG as it was &ldquo;yet to see the report&rdquo;.<br /><br />&ldquo;We reiterate that, as a contractor, we remain committed to complying with the production sharing contract provisions and procedures, including adopting good international petroleum industry practices in our operations,&rdquo; it said.<br /><br /><em>Profit-sharing logic<br /></em><br />The CAG questioned the slabs for profit sharing between the operator and the government. It contended that these slabs were structured in such a way that the government&rsquo;s share of profit petroleum would go down if the capital intensity of the project increased.<br /><br />&ldquo;In view of the adverse impact of the profit-sharing mechanism in protecting government&rsquo;s interest, designed in the 1990s, there does seem to be enough ground to revisit the formula,&rdquo; CAG said.<br /><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/auditor-raps-govt-role-in-kg-9960.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Auditor raps govt role in KG | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Telegraph The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) has slammed the petroleum ministry for failing to take back 25 per cent of the acreage of the KG-D6 oil and gas block off the Andhra coast from Reliance Industries after it reneged..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Auditor raps govt role in KG</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p>-The Telegraph</p><p> </p><div align="justify">The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) has slammed the petroleum ministry for failing to take back 25 per cent of the acreage of the KG-D6 oil and gas block off the Andhra coast from Reliance Industries after it reneged on its drilling obligations.<br /><br />The long-awaited report from the CAG based on a detailed performance audit of the country’s hydrocarbon production sharing contracts was tabled in Parliament today.<br /><br />The nation’s auditor surprisingly did not comment on the bigger charge against Reliance Industries that it had “gold-plated” development costs at India’s only commercially-operated deepwater gasfield to depress the government’s share of profit petroleum from the gasfield.<br /><br />The CAG did not say whether the approval by the upstream regulator — the directorate general of hydrocarbons — of RIL’s plan to raise the development cost from $2.4 billion in 2004 to $8.8 billion in 2006 was justified or not.<br /><br />All that the CAG said was that the “approval of estimates does not constitute acceptance of the project costs,” suggesting that this could be done only after a thorough audit of the actual costs incurred.<br /><br />The report did, however, express some reservations about the hike in development costs. It said that with gas output from KG-D6 plunging to about 43 million standard cubic metres per day (mmscmd) — which is close to the 40 mmscmd output level envisaged in the 2004 investment plan — doubts could be raised about “whether the upgradation to 80mmscmd with substantial increase in the development cost (to $8.8 billion) was justified”.<br /><br />The report blamed the petroleum ministry and the DGH for allowing Reliance to retain the entire 7,645 sq km KG-DWN-98/3 (KG-D6) block in the Bay of Bengal after the giant Dhirubhai-1 and 3 gas finds were made in 2001. The report said if the penal provisions of the production-sharing contract (PSC) had been enforced, Reliance would have had to relinquish 25 per cent of the total area outside the discoveries in June 2004 and 2005.<br /><br />The petroleum ministry had declared the entire block as a “discovery area” and allowed the company to retain it.<br /><br />“We recommend that the ministry of petroleum and natural gas should review the determination of the entire contract area as ‘discovery area’ strictly in terms of the PSC provisions….delineation of the discovery area and relinquishment of the rest (by RIL),” the report said.<br /><br />Reliance had committed to drill 22 wells in KG-D6 in fiscal 2011. However, the company had drilled 20 wells in the D1 and D3 areas. Of these, only 18 are in production, and petroleum experts say this is one of the main reasons for the sharp decline in the gas production from the field to about 43 mmscmd from 61.5 mmscmd.<br /><br />India’s only deepwater block that started commercial production two years ago was supposed to raise production to 69 mmscmd by April.<br /><br /><em>RIL stock surge<br /></em><br />The RIL stock surged after market mavens realised that the CAG report wasn’t as damaging as they had feared. The stock — which has been under considerable pressure since mid-June when portions of the CAG’s draft report were leaked to the media — soared to close at Rs 853.50, a gain of 2.62 per cent. Experts say the stock can now stage a “relief rally” as the auditor hasn’t come down as hard on it.<br /><br />Reliance said it could not comment on the final audit findings of the CAG as it was “yet to see the report”.<br /><br />“We reiterate that, as a contractor, we remain committed to complying with the production sharing contract provisions and procedures, including adopting good international petroleum industry practices in our operations,” it said.<br /><br /><em>Profit-sharing logic<br /></em><br />The CAG questioned the slabs for profit sharing between the operator and the government. It contended that these slabs were structured in such a way that the government’s share of profit petroleum would go down if the capital intensity of the project increased.<br /><br />“In view of the adverse impact of the profit-sharing mechanism in protecting government’s interest, designed in the 1990s, there does seem to be enough ground to revisit the formula,” CAG said.<br /><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 9851, 'title' => 'Auditor raps govt role in KG', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p> -The Telegraph </p> <p> </p> <div align="justify"> The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) has slammed the petroleum ministry for failing to take back 25 per cent of the acreage of the KG-D6 oil and gas block off the Andhra coast from Reliance Industries after it reneged on its drilling obligations.<br /> <br /> The long-awaited report from the CAG based on a detailed performance audit of the country’s hydrocarbon production sharing contracts was tabled in Parliament today.<br /> <br /> The nation’s auditor surprisingly did not comment on the bigger charge against Reliance Industries that it had “gold-plated” development costs at India’s only commercially-operated deepwater gasfield to depress the government’s share of profit petroleum from the gasfield.<br /> <br /> The CAG did not say whether the approval by the upstream regulator — the directorate general of hydrocarbons — of RIL’s plan to raise the development cost from $2.4 billion in 2004 to $8.8 billion in 2006 was justified or not.<br /> <br /> All that the CAG said was that the “approval of estimates does not constitute acceptance of the project costs,” suggesting that this could be done only after a thorough audit of the actual costs incurred.<br /> <br /> The report did, however, express some reservations about the hike in development costs. It said that with gas output from KG-D6 plunging to about 43 million standard cubic metres per day (mmscmd) — which is close to the 40 mmscmd output level envisaged in the 2004 investment plan — doubts could be raised about “whether the upgradation to 80mmscmd with substantial increase in the development cost (to $8.8 billion) was justified”.<br /> <br /> The report blamed the petroleum ministry and the DGH for allowing Reliance to retain the entire 7,645 sq km KG-DWN-98/3 (KG-D6) block in the Bay of Bengal after the giant Dhirubhai-1 and 3 gas finds were made in 2001. The report said if the penal provisions of the production-sharing contract (PSC) had been enforced, Reliance would have had to relinquish 25 per cent of the total area outside the discoveries in June 2004 and 2005.<br /> <br /> The petroleum ministry had declared the entire block as a “discovery area” and allowed the company to retain it.<br /> <br /> “We recommend that the ministry of petroleum and natural gas should review the determination of the entire contract area as ‘discovery area’ strictly in terms of the PSC provisions….delineation of the discovery area and relinquishment of the rest (by RIL),” the report said.<br /> <br /> Reliance had committed to drill 22 wells in KG-D6 in fiscal 2011. However, the company had drilled 20 wells in the D1 and D3 areas. Of these, only 18 are in production, and petroleum experts say this is one of the main reasons for the sharp decline in the gas production from the field to about 43 mmscmd from 61.5 mmscmd.<br /> <br /> India’s only deepwater block that started commercial production two years ago was supposed to raise production to 69 mmscmd by April.<br /> <br /> <em>RIL stock surge<br /> </em><br /> The RIL stock surged after market mavens realised that the CAG report wasn’t as damaging as they had feared. The stock — which has been under considerable pressure since mid-June when portions of the CAG’s draft report were leaked to the media — soared to close at Rs 853.50, a gain of 2.62 per cent. Experts say the stock can now stage a “relief rally” as the auditor hasn’t come down as hard on it.<br /> <br /> Reliance said it could not comment on the final audit findings of the CAG as it was “yet to see the report”.<br /> <br /> “We reiterate that, as a contractor, we remain committed to complying with the production sharing contract provisions and procedures, including adopting good international petroleum industry practices in our operations,” it said.<br /> <br /> <em>Profit-sharing logic<br /> </em><br /> The CAG questioned the slabs for profit sharing between the operator and the government. It contended that these slabs were structured in such a way that the government’s share of profit petroleum would go down if the capital intensity of the project increased.<br /> <br /> “In view of the adverse impact of the profit-sharing mechanism in protecting government’s interest, designed in the 1990s, there does seem to be enough ground to revisit the formula,” CAG said.<br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 9 September, 2011, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1110909/jsp/business/story_14484602.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'auditor-raps-govt-role-in-kg-9960', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 9960, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 9851, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Auditor raps govt role in KG', 'metaKeywords' => 'Comptroller and Auditor-General,CAG', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Telegraph The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) has slammed the petroleum ministry for failing to take back 25 per cent of the acreage of the KG-D6 oil and gas block off the Andhra coast from Reliance Industries after it reneged...', 'disp' => '<p>-The Telegraph</p><p> </p><div align="justify">The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) has slammed the petroleum ministry for failing to take back 25 per cent of the acreage of the KG-D6 oil and gas block off the Andhra coast from Reliance Industries after it reneged on its drilling obligations.<br /><br />The long-awaited report from the CAG based on a detailed performance audit of the country’s hydrocarbon production sharing contracts was tabled in Parliament today.<br /><br />The nation’s auditor surprisingly did not comment on the bigger charge against Reliance Industries that it had “gold-plated” development costs at India’s only commercially-operated deepwater gasfield to depress the government’s share of profit petroleum from the gasfield.<br /><br />The CAG did not say whether the approval by the upstream regulator — the directorate general of hydrocarbons — of RIL’s plan to raise the development cost from $2.4 billion in 2004 to $8.8 billion in 2006 was justified or not.<br /><br />All that the CAG said was that the “approval of estimates does not constitute acceptance of the project costs,” suggesting that this could be done only after a thorough audit of the actual costs incurred.<br /><br />The report did, however, express some reservations about the hike in development costs. It said that with gas output from KG-D6 plunging to about 43 million standard cubic metres per day (mmscmd) — which is close to the 40 mmscmd output level envisaged in the 2004 investment plan — doubts could be raised about “whether the upgradation to 80mmscmd with substantial increase in the development cost (to $8.8 billion) was justified”.<br /><br />The report blamed the petroleum ministry and the DGH for allowing Reliance to retain the entire 7,645 sq km KG-DWN-98/3 (KG-D6) block in the Bay of Bengal after the giant Dhirubhai-1 and 3 gas finds were made in 2001. The report said if the penal provisions of the production-sharing contract (PSC) had been enforced, Reliance would have had to relinquish 25 per cent of the total area outside the discoveries in June 2004 and 2005.<br /><br />The petroleum ministry had declared the entire block as a “discovery area” and allowed the company to retain it.<br /><br />“We recommend that the ministry of petroleum and natural gas should review the determination of the entire contract area as ‘discovery area’ strictly in terms of the PSC provisions….delineation of the discovery area and relinquishment of the rest (by RIL),” the report said.<br /><br />Reliance had committed to drill 22 wells in KG-D6 in fiscal 2011. However, the company had drilled 20 wells in the D1 and D3 areas. Of these, only 18 are in production, and petroleum experts say this is one of the main reasons for the sharp decline in the gas production from the field to about 43 mmscmd from 61.5 mmscmd.<br /><br />India’s only deepwater block that started commercial production two years ago was supposed to raise production to 69 mmscmd by April.<br /><br /><em>RIL stock surge<br /></em><br />The RIL stock surged after market mavens realised that the CAG report wasn’t as damaging as they had feared. The stock — which has been under considerable pressure since mid-June when portions of the CAG’s draft report were leaked to the media — soared to close at Rs 853.50, a gain of 2.62 per cent. Experts say the stock can now stage a “relief rally” as the auditor hasn’t come down as hard on it.<br /><br />Reliance said it could not comment on the final audit findings of the CAG as it was “yet to see the report”.<br /><br />“We reiterate that, as a contractor, we remain committed to complying with the production sharing contract provisions and procedures, including adopting good international petroleum industry practices in our operations,” it said.<br /><br /><em>Profit-sharing logic<br /></em><br />The CAG questioned the slabs for profit sharing between the operator and the government. It contended that these slabs were structured in such a way that the government’s share of profit petroleum would go down if the capital intensity of the project increased.<br /><br />“In view of the adverse impact of the profit-sharing mechanism in protecting government’s interest, designed in the 1990s, there does seem to be enough ground to revisit the formula,” CAG said.<br /><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 9851, 'title' => 'Auditor raps govt role in KG', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p> -The Telegraph </p> <p> </p> <div align="justify"> The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) has slammed the petroleum ministry for failing to take back 25 per cent of the acreage of the KG-D6 oil and gas block off the Andhra coast from Reliance Industries after it reneged on its drilling obligations.<br /> <br /> The long-awaited report from the CAG based on a detailed performance audit of the country’s hydrocarbon production sharing contracts was tabled in Parliament today.<br /> <br /> The nation’s auditor surprisingly did not comment on the bigger charge against Reliance Industries that it had “gold-plated” development costs at India’s only commercially-operated deepwater gasfield to depress the government’s share of profit petroleum from the gasfield.<br /> <br /> The CAG did not say whether the approval by the upstream regulator — the directorate general of hydrocarbons — of RIL’s plan to raise the development cost from $2.4 billion in 2004 to $8.8 billion in 2006 was justified or not.<br /> <br /> All that the CAG said was that the “approval of estimates does not constitute acceptance of the project costs,” suggesting that this could be done only after a thorough audit of the actual costs incurred.<br /> <br /> The report did, however, express some reservations about the hike in development costs. It said that with gas output from KG-D6 plunging to about 43 million standard cubic metres per day (mmscmd) — which is close to the 40 mmscmd output level envisaged in the 2004 investment plan — doubts could be raised about “whether the upgradation to 80mmscmd with substantial increase in the development cost (to $8.8 billion) was justified”.<br /> <br /> The report blamed the petroleum ministry and the DGH for allowing Reliance to retain the entire 7,645 sq km KG-DWN-98/3 (KG-D6) block in the Bay of Bengal after the giant Dhirubhai-1 and 3 gas finds were made in 2001. The report said if the penal provisions of the production-sharing contract (PSC) had been enforced, Reliance would have had to relinquish 25 per cent of the total area outside the discoveries in June 2004 and 2005.<br /> <br /> The petroleum ministry had declared the entire block as a “discovery area” and allowed the company to retain it.<br /> <br /> “We recommend that the ministry of petroleum and natural gas should review the determination of the entire contract area as ‘discovery area’ strictly in terms of the PSC provisions….delineation of the discovery area and relinquishment of the rest (by RIL),” the report said.<br /> <br /> Reliance had committed to drill 22 wells in KG-D6 in fiscal 2011. However, the company had drilled 20 wells in the D1 and D3 areas. Of these, only 18 are in production, and petroleum experts say this is one of the main reasons for the sharp decline in the gas production from the field to about 43 mmscmd from 61.5 mmscmd.<br /> <br /> India’s only deepwater block that started commercial production two years ago was supposed to raise production to 69 mmscmd by April.<br /> <br /> <em>RIL stock surge<br /> </em><br /> The RIL stock surged after market mavens realised that the CAG report wasn’t as damaging as they had feared. The stock — which has been under considerable pressure since mid-June when portions of the CAG’s draft report were leaked to the media — soared to close at Rs 853.50, a gain of 2.62 per cent. Experts say the stock can now stage a “relief rally” as the auditor hasn’t come down as hard on it.<br /> <br /> Reliance said it could not comment on the final audit findings of the CAG as it was “yet to see the report”.<br /> <br /> “We reiterate that, as a contractor, we remain committed to complying with the production sharing contract provisions and procedures, including adopting good international petroleum industry practices in our operations,” it said.<br /> <br /> <em>Profit-sharing logic<br /> </em><br /> The CAG questioned the slabs for profit sharing between the operator and the government. It contended that these slabs were structured in such a way that the government’s share of profit petroleum would go down if the capital intensity of the project increased.<br /> <br /> “In view of the adverse impact of the profit-sharing mechanism in protecting government’s interest, designed in the 1990s, there does seem to be enough ground to revisit the formula,” CAG said.<br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 9 September, 2011, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1110909/jsp/business/story_14484602.jsp', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'auditor-raps-govt-role-in-kg-9960', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 9960, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 9851 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Auditor raps govt role in KG' $metaKeywords = 'Comptroller and Auditor-General,CAG' $metaDesc = ' -The Telegraph The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) has slammed the petroleum ministry for failing to take back 25 per cent of the acreage of the KG-D6 oil and gas block off the Andhra coast from Reliance Industries after it reneged...' $disp = '<p>-The Telegraph</p><p> </p><div align="justify">The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) has slammed the petroleum ministry for failing to take back 25 per cent of the acreage of the KG-D6 oil and gas block off the Andhra coast from Reliance Industries after it reneged on its drilling obligations.<br /><br />The long-awaited report from the CAG based on a detailed performance audit of the country’s hydrocarbon production sharing contracts was tabled in Parliament today.<br /><br />The nation’s auditor surprisingly did not comment on the bigger charge against Reliance Industries that it had “gold-plated” development costs at India’s only commercially-operated deepwater gasfield to depress the government’s share of profit petroleum from the gasfield.<br /><br />The CAG did not say whether the approval by the upstream regulator — the directorate general of hydrocarbons — of RIL’s plan to raise the development cost from $2.4 billion in 2004 to $8.8 billion in 2006 was justified or not.<br /><br />All that the CAG said was that the “approval of estimates does not constitute acceptance of the project costs,” suggesting that this could be done only after a thorough audit of the actual costs incurred.<br /><br />The report did, however, express some reservations about the hike in development costs. It said that with gas output from KG-D6 plunging to about 43 million standard cubic metres per day (mmscmd) — which is close to the 40 mmscmd output level envisaged in the 2004 investment plan — doubts could be raised about “whether the upgradation to 80mmscmd with substantial increase in the development cost (to $8.8 billion) was justified”.<br /><br />The report blamed the petroleum ministry and the DGH for allowing Reliance to retain the entire 7,645 sq km KG-DWN-98/3 (KG-D6) block in the Bay of Bengal after the giant Dhirubhai-1 and 3 gas finds were made in 2001. The report said if the penal provisions of the production-sharing contract (PSC) had been enforced, Reliance would have had to relinquish 25 per cent of the total area outside the discoveries in June 2004 and 2005.<br /><br />The petroleum ministry had declared the entire block as a “discovery area” and allowed the company to retain it.<br /><br />“We recommend that the ministry of petroleum and natural gas should review the determination of the entire contract area as ‘discovery area’ strictly in terms of the PSC provisions….delineation of the discovery area and relinquishment of the rest (by RIL),” the report said.<br /><br />Reliance had committed to drill 22 wells in KG-D6 in fiscal 2011. However, the company had drilled 20 wells in the D1 and D3 areas. Of these, only 18 are in production, and petroleum experts say this is one of the main reasons for the sharp decline in the gas production from the field to about 43 mmscmd from 61.5 mmscmd.<br /><br />India’s only deepwater block that started commercial production two years ago was supposed to raise production to 69 mmscmd by April.<br /><br /><em>RIL stock surge<br /></em><br />The RIL stock surged after market mavens realised that the CAG report wasn’t as damaging as they had feared. The stock — which has been under considerable pressure since mid-June when portions of the CAG’s draft report were leaked to the media — soared to close at Rs 853.50, a gain of 2.62 per cent. Experts say the stock can now stage a “relief rally” as the auditor hasn’t come down as hard on it.<br /><br />Reliance said it could not comment on the final audit findings of the CAG as it was “yet to see the report”.<br /><br />“We reiterate that, as a contractor, we remain committed to complying with the production sharing contract provisions and procedures, including adopting good international petroleum industry practices in our operations,” it said.<br /><br /><em>Profit-sharing logic<br /></em><br />The CAG questioned the slabs for profit sharing between the operator and the government. It contended that these slabs were structured in such a way that the government’s share of profit petroleum would go down if the capital intensity of the project increased.<br /><br />“In view of the adverse impact of the profit-sharing mechanism in protecting government’s interest, designed in the 1990s, there does seem to be enough ground to revisit the formula,” CAG said.<br /><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Auditor raps govt role in KG |
-The Telegraph
The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) has slammed the petroleum ministry for failing to take back 25 per cent of the acreage of the KG-D6 oil and gas block off the Andhra coast from Reliance Industries after it reneged on its drilling obligations.
The long-awaited report from the CAG based on a detailed performance audit of the country’s hydrocarbon production sharing contracts was tabled in Parliament today. The nation’s auditor surprisingly did not comment on the bigger charge against Reliance Industries that it had “gold-plated” development costs at India’s only commercially-operated deepwater gasfield to depress the government’s share of profit petroleum from the gasfield. The CAG did not say whether the approval by the upstream regulator — the directorate general of hydrocarbons — of RIL’s plan to raise the development cost from $2.4 billion in 2004 to $8.8 billion in 2006 was justified or not. All that the CAG said was that the “approval of estimates does not constitute acceptance of the project costs,” suggesting that this could be done only after a thorough audit of the actual costs incurred. The report did, however, express some reservations about the hike in development costs. It said that with gas output from KG-D6 plunging to about 43 million standard cubic metres per day (mmscmd) — which is close to the 40 mmscmd output level envisaged in the 2004 investment plan — doubts could be raised about “whether the upgradation to 80mmscmd with substantial increase in the development cost (to $8.8 billion) was justified”. The report blamed the petroleum ministry and the DGH for allowing Reliance to retain the entire 7,645 sq km KG-DWN-98/3 (KG-D6) block in the Bay of Bengal after the giant Dhirubhai-1 and 3 gas finds were made in 2001. The report said if the penal provisions of the production-sharing contract (PSC) had been enforced, Reliance would have had to relinquish 25 per cent of the total area outside the discoveries in June 2004 and 2005. The petroleum ministry had declared the entire block as a “discovery area” and allowed the company to retain it. “We recommend that the ministry of petroleum and natural gas should review the determination of the entire contract area as ‘discovery area’ strictly in terms of the PSC provisions….delineation of the discovery area and relinquishment of the rest (by RIL),” the report said. Reliance had committed to drill 22 wells in KG-D6 in fiscal 2011. However, the company had drilled 20 wells in the D1 and D3 areas. Of these, only 18 are in production, and petroleum experts say this is one of the main reasons for the sharp decline in the gas production from the field to about 43 mmscmd from 61.5 mmscmd. India’s only deepwater block that started commercial production two years ago was supposed to raise production to 69 mmscmd by April. RIL stock surge The RIL stock surged after market mavens realised that the CAG report wasn’t as damaging as they had feared. The stock — which has been under considerable pressure since mid-June when portions of the CAG’s draft report were leaked to the media — soared to close at Rs 853.50, a gain of 2.62 per cent. Experts say the stock can now stage a “relief rally” as the auditor hasn’t come down as hard on it. Reliance said it could not comment on the final audit findings of the CAG as it was “yet to see the report”. “We reiterate that, as a contractor, we remain committed to complying with the production sharing contract provisions and procedures, including adopting good international petroleum industry practices in our operations,” it said. Profit-sharing logic The CAG questioned the slabs for profit sharing between the operator and the government. It contended that these slabs were structured in such a way that the government’s share of profit petroleum would go down if the capital intensity of the project increased. “In view of the adverse impact of the profit-sharing mechanism in protecting government’s interest, designed in the 1990s, there does seem to be enough ground to revisit the formula,” CAG said. |