Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/babri-demolition-report-to-be-tabled-in-parliament-today-497/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/babri-demolition-report-to-be-tabled-in-parliament-today-497/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/babri-demolition-report-to-be-tabled-in-parliament-today-497/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/babri-demolition-report-to-be-tabled-in-parliament-today-497/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f889eef85-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f889eef85-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6804f889eef85-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f889eef85-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f889eef85-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f889eef85-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f889eef85-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6804f889eef85-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6804f889eef85-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 428, 'title' => 'Babri demolition report to be tabled in Parliament today', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The UPA government has given in to the Opposition&rsquo;s demand to immediately table the Liberhan Commission report in Parliament. To this end, a meeting of the Union Cabinet was convened on Tuesday morning to approve the Action Taken Report (ATR) that will be tabled along with the Liberhan Commission report. The decision was taken after consultations with Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, who is in Washington. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The government was initially reluctant to accept the Opposition's demand given the fact that the Commission&rsquo;s report was yet to be translated into Hindi and there was only one copy of the report available. It, however, decided to go ahead given the apprehension that the Opposition would continue to stall proceedings of the House on the issue. The Opposition&rsquo;s demand came after The Indian Express&rsquo;s story on the findings of the Liberhan Commission on Monday. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Meanwhile, amid controversy over &ldquo;leakage&rdquo; of the Liberhan Commission report, the Congress on Monday attacked the Opposition party saying that &ldquo;the guilt and culpability&rdquo; for the demolition of Babri Masjid lay with &ldquo;the BJP and its affiliates&rdquo;. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;Events leading to December 6, 1992, played out in full public view and culminated in the conviction of Kalyan Singh for misleading the court. Perceptionally, the issue in the minds of the people is already settled as to who is responsible and who is guilty. Perceptionally, the issue is already settled as far as guilt and culpability is concerned. It lies primarily with the BJP and its affiliates,&rdquo; Congress spokesman Manish Tewari told reporters. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Earlier in the day, Home Minister P Chidambaram said in both Houses that the report would be tabled during the current session and pointed out that since Justice M S Liberhan had submitted the report on June 30, the Government was required to place it before the two Houses together with the ATR within six months from that date. Chidambaram said he would &ldquo;refrain from commenting on the correctness or otherwise of the contents of the news story.&rdquo; </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Stoutly denying the suggestion that the leakage of the report could be traced to his ministry, he said there was only one copy of the report in the Home ministry which was in &ldquo;safe custody.&rdquo; &ldquo;No one from the Ministry of Home Affairs has spoken to any journalist about the report,&rdquo; he reiterated. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Both Houses underwent two adjournments &mdash; the first around 11.30 am and the second after noon &mdash; to finally adjourn for the day after 2 pm. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In the Lok Sabha, Leader of Opposition L K Advani, who had given a notice for the suspension of Question Hour, sought to know who had leaked the contents of the report. He said when one of his colleagues had asked the editor of The Indian Express about the report, he had said, &ldquo;I can tell you, it is authentic. There is nothing imaginary about what we have published.&rdquo; </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;Had there been my indictment, my party&rsquo;s indictment, one could understand, but looking at the mention of Vajpayee, I felt it is my duty (to speak up for him),&rdquo; Advani said.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">He said after the publication of this report, the government did not have the right to delay its tabling even for a day. Advani said the government should table the report also because The Indian Express report carried a footnote that it would be continued. He said this also amounted to a breach of privilege, but that was a different issue. &ldquo;I have not taken recourse to a privilege motion,&rdquo; he said. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">SP leader Mulayam Singh Yadav, CPI(M) leader Basudeb Acharia, BSP leader Dhara Singh Chauhan and BJD leader Arjun Charan Sethi also asked the government to table the report. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Meanwhile, in the Rajya Sabha, Leader of Opposition Arun Jaitley raised the issue as soon as the House met. Jaitley said the leakage of the report had lowered the dignity of Parliament, and that the source of leakage is indicated in the report itself as it refers to sources in the Union Home Ministry. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">After Chidambaram&rsquo;s denial, Jaitley said if that was the case then the &ldquo;breach of the privilege of this House has taken place at the behest of the Commission&rdquo; since the only other copy is with the latter. He sought an inquiry into the matter. </font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 24 November, 2009, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/babri-demolition-report-to-be-tabled-in-parl-today/545508/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'babri-demolition-report-to-be-tabled-in-parliament-today-497', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 497, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [[maximum depth reached]], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 428, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Babri demolition report to be tabled in Parliament today', 'metaKeywords' => null, 'metaDesc' => ' The UPA government has given in to the Opposition&rsquo;s demand to immediately table the Liberhan Commission report in Parliament. To this end, a meeting of the Union Cabinet was convened on Tuesday morning to approve the Action Taken Report (ATR)...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The UPA government has given in to the Opposition&rsquo;s demand to immediately table the Liberhan Commission report in Parliament. To this end, a meeting of the Union Cabinet was convened on Tuesday morning to approve the Action Taken Report (ATR) that will be tabled along with the Liberhan Commission report. The decision was taken after consultations with Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, who is in Washington. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The government was initially reluctant to accept the Opposition's demand given the fact that the Commission&rsquo;s report was yet to be translated into Hindi and there was only one copy of the report available. It, however, decided to go ahead given the apprehension that the Opposition would continue to stall proceedings of the House on the issue. The Opposition&rsquo;s demand came after The Indian Express&rsquo;s story on the findings of the Liberhan Commission on Monday. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Meanwhile, amid controversy over &ldquo;leakage&rdquo; of the Liberhan Commission report, the Congress on Monday attacked the Opposition party saying that &ldquo;the guilt and culpability&rdquo; for the demolition of Babri Masjid lay with &ldquo;the BJP and its affiliates&rdquo;. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >&ldquo;Events leading to December 6, 1992, played out in full public view and culminated in the conviction of Kalyan Singh for misleading the court. Perceptionally, the issue in the minds of the people is already settled as to who is responsible and who is guilty. Perceptionally, the issue is already settled as far as guilt and culpability is concerned. It lies primarily with the BJP and its affiliates,&rdquo; Congress spokesman Manish Tewari told reporters. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Earlier in the day, Home Minister P Chidambaram said in both Houses that the report would be tabled during the current session and pointed out that since Justice M S Liberhan had submitted the report on June 30, the Government was required to place it before the two Houses together with the ATR within six months from that date. Chidambaram said he would &ldquo;refrain from commenting on the correctness or otherwise of the contents of the news story.&rdquo; </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Stoutly denying the suggestion that the leakage of the report could be traced to his ministry, he said there was only one copy of the report in the Home ministry which was in &ldquo;safe custody.&rdquo; &ldquo;No one from the Ministry of Home Affairs has spoken to any journalist about the report,&rdquo; he reiterated. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Both Houses underwent two adjournments &mdash; the first around 11.30 am and the second after noon &mdash; to finally adjourn for the day after 2 pm. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >In the Lok Sabha, Leader of Opposition L K Advani, who had given a notice for the suspension of Question Hour, sought to know who had leaked the contents of the report. He said when one of his colleagues had asked the editor of The Indian Express about the report, he had said, &ldquo;I can tell you, it is authentic. There is nothing imaginary about what we have published.&rdquo; </font></p><p align="justify"><font >&ldquo;Had there been my indictment, my party&rsquo;s indictment, one could understand, but looking at the mention of Vajpayee, I felt it is my duty (to speak up for him),&rdquo; Advani said.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >He said after the publication of this report, the government did not have the right to delay its tabling even for a day. Advani said the government should table the report also because The Indian Express report carried a footnote that it would be continued. He said this also amounted to a breach of privilege, but that was a different issue. &ldquo;I have not taken recourse to a privilege motion,&rdquo; he said. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >SP leader Mulayam Singh Yadav, CPI(M) leader Basudeb Acharia, BSP leader Dhara Singh Chauhan and BJD leader Arjun Charan Sethi also asked the government to table the report. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Meanwhile, in the Rajya Sabha, Leader of Opposition Arun Jaitley raised the issue as soon as the House met. Jaitley said the leakage of the report had lowered the dignity of Parliament, and that the source of leakage is indicated in the report itself as it refers to sources in the Union Home Ministry. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >After Chidambaram&rsquo;s denial, Jaitley said if that was the case then the &ldquo;breach of the privilege of this House has taken place at the behest of the Commission&rdquo; since the only other copy is with the latter. He sought an inquiry into the matter. </font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 428, 'title' => 'Babri demolition report to be tabled in Parliament today', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The UPA government has given in to the Opposition&rsquo;s demand to immediately table the Liberhan Commission report in Parliament. To this end, a meeting of the Union Cabinet was convened on Tuesday morning to approve the Action Taken Report (ATR) that will be tabled along with the Liberhan Commission report. The decision was taken after consultations with Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, who is in Washington. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The government was initially reluctant to accept the Opposition's demand given the fact that the Commission&rsquo;s report was yet to be translated into Hindi and there was only one copy of the report available. It, however, decided to go ahead given the apprehension that the Opposition would continue to stall proceedings of the House on the issue. The Opposition&rsquo;s demand came after The Indian Express&rsquo;s story on the findings of the Liberhan Commission on Monday. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Meanwhile, amid controversy over &ldquo;leakage&rdquo; of the Liberhan Commission report, the Congress on Monday attacked the Opposition party saying that &ldquo;the guilt and culpability&rdquo; for the demolition of Babri Masjid lay with &ldquo;the BJP and its affiliates&rdquo;. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;Events leading to December 6, 1992, played out in full public view and culminated in the conviction of Kalyan Singh for misleading the court. Perceptionally, the issue in the minds of the people is already settled as to who is responsible and who is guilty. Perceptionally, the issue is already settled as far as guilt and culpability is concerned. It lies primarily with the BJP and its affiliates,&rdquo; Congress spokesman Manish Tewari told reporters. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Earlier in the day, Home Minister P Chidambaram said in both Houses that the report would be tabled during the current session and pointed out that since Justice M S Liberhan had submitted the report on June 30, the Government was required to place it before the two Houses together with the ATR within six months from that date. Chidambaram said he would &ldquo;refrain from commenting on the correctness or otherwise of the contents of the news story.&rdquo; </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Stoutly denying the suggestion that the leakage of the report could be traced to his ministry, he said there was only one copy of the report in the Home ministry which was in &ldquo;safe custody.&rdquo; &ldquo;No one from the Ministry of Home Affairs has spoken to any journalist about the report,&rdquo; he reiterated. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Both Houses underwent two adjournments &mdash; the first around 11.30 am and the second after noon &mdash; to finally adjourn for the day after 2 pm. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In the Lok Sabha, Leader of Opposition L K Advani, who had given a notice for the suspension of Question Hour, sought to know who had leaked the contents of the report. He said when one of his colleagues had asked the editor of The Indian Express about the report, he had said, &ldquo;I can tell you, it is authentic. There is nothing imaginary about what we have published.&rdquo; </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;Had there been my indictment, my party&rsquo;s indictment, one could understand, but looking at the mention of Vajpayee, I felt it is my duty (to speak up for him),&rdquo; Advani said.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">He said after the publication of this report, the government did not have the right to delay its tabling even for a day. Advani said the government should table the report also because The Indian Express report carried a footnote that it would be continued. He said this also amounted to a breach of privilege, but that was a different issue. &ldquo;I have not taken recourse to a privilege motion,&rdquo; he said. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">SP leader Mulayam Singh Yadav, CPI(M) leader Basudeb Acharia, BSP leader Dhara Singh Chauhan and BJD leader Arjun Charan Sethi also asked the government to table the report. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Meanwhile, in the Rajya Sabha, Leader of Opposition Arun Jaitley raised the issue as soon as the House met. Jaitley said the leakage of the report had lowered the dignity of Parliament, and that the source of leakage is indicated in the report itself as it refers to sources in the Union Home Ministry. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">After Chidambaram&rsquo;s denial, Jaitley said if that was the case then the &ldquo;breach of the privilege of this House has taken place at the behest of the Commission&rdquo; since the only other copy is with the latter. He sought an inquiry into the matter. </font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 24 November, 2009, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/babri-demolition-report-to-be-tabled-in-parl-today/545508/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'babri-demolition-report-to-be-tabled-in-parliament-today-497', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 497, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 428 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Babri demolition report to be tabled in Parliament today' $metaKeywords = null $metaDesc = ' The UPA government has given in to the Opposition&rsquo;s demand to immediately table the Liberhan Commission report in Parliament. To this end, a meeting of the Union Cabinet was convened on Tuesday morning to approve the Action Taken Report (ATR)...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The UPA government has given in to the Opposition&rsquo;s demand to immediately table the Liberhan Commission report in Parliament. To this end, a meeting of the Union Cabinet was convened on Tuesday morning to approve the Action Taken Report (ATR) that will be tabled along with the Liberhan Commission report. The decision was taken after consultations with Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, who is in Washington. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The government was initially reluctant to accept the Opposition's demand given the fact that the Commission&rsquo;s report was yet to be translated into Hindi and there was only one copy of the report available. It, however, decided to go ahead given the apprehension that the Opposition would continue to stall proceedings of the House on the issue. The Opposition&rsquo;s demand came after The Indian Express&rsquo;s story on the findings of the Liberhan Commission on Monday. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Meanwhile, amid controversy over &ldquo;leakage&rdquo; of the Liberhan Commission report, the Congress on Monday attacked the Opposition party saying that &ldquo;the guilt and culpability&rdquo; for the demolition of Babri Masjid lay with &ldquo;the BJP and its affiliates&rdquo;. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >&ldquo;Events leading to December 6, 1992, played out in full public view and culminated in the conviction of Kalyan Singh for misleading the court. Perceptionally, the issue in the minds of the people is already settled as to who is responsible and who is guilty. Perceptionally, the issue is already settled as far as guilt and culpability is concerned. It lies primarily with the BJP and its affiliates,&rdquo; Congress spokesman Manish Tewari told reporters. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Earlier in the day, Home Minister P Chidambaram said in both Houses that the report would be tabled during the current session and pointed out that since Justice M S Liberhan had submitted the report on June 30, the Government was required to place it before the two Houses together with the ATR within six months from that date. Chidambaram said he would &ldquo;refrain from commenting on the correctness or otherwise of the contents of the news story.&rdquo; </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Stoutly denying the suggestion that the leakage of the report could be traced to his ministry, he said there was only one copy of the report in the Home ministry which was in &ldquo;safe custody.&rdquo; &ldquo;No one from the Ministry of Home Affairs has spoken to any journalist about the report,&rdquo; he reiterated. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Both Houses underwent two adjournments &mdash; the first around 11.30 am and the second after noon &mdash; to finally adjourn for the day after 2 pm. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >In the Lok Sabha, Leader of Opposition L K Advani, who had given a notice for the suspension of Question Hour, sought to know who had leaked the contents of the report. He said when one of his colleagues had asked the editor of The Indian Express about the report, he had said, &ldquo;I can tell you, it is authentic. There is nothing imaginary about what we have published.&rdquo; </font></p><p align="justify"><font >&ldquo;Had there been my indictment, my party&rsquo;s indictment, one could understand, but looking at the mention of Vajpayee, I felt it is my duty (to speak up for him),&rdquo; Advani said.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >He said after the publication of this report, the government did not have the right to delay its tabling even for a day. Advani said the government should table the report also because The Indian Express report carried a footnote that it would be continued. He said this also amounted to a breach of privilege, but that was a different issue. &ldquo;I have not taken recourse to a privilege motion,&rdquo; he said. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >SP leader Mulayam Singh Yadav, CPI(M) leader Basudeb Acharia, BSP leader Dhara Singh Chauhan and BJD leader Arjun Charan Sethi also asked the government to table the report. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Meanwhile, in the Rajya Sabha, Leader of Opposition Arun Jaitley raised the issue as soon as the House met. Jaitley said the leakage of the report had lowered the dignity of Parliament, and that the source of leakage is indicated in the report itself as it refers to sources in the Union Home Ministry. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >After Chidambaram&rsquo;s denial, Jaitley said if that was the case then the &ldquo;breach of the privilege of this House has taken place at the behest of the Commission&rdquo; since the only other copy is with the latter. He sought an inquiry into the matter. </font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/babri-demolition-report-to-be-tabled-in-parliament-today-497.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Babri demolition report to be tabled in Parliament today | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" The UPA government has given in to the Opposition’s demand to immediately table the Liberhan Commission report in Parliament. To this end, a meeting of the Union Cabinet was convened on Tuesday morning to approve the Action Taken Report (ATR)..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Babri demolition report to be tabled in Parliament today</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The UPA government has given in to the Opposition’s demand to immediately table the Liberhan Commission report in Parliament. To this end, a meeting of the Union Cabinet was convened on Tuesday morning to approve the Action Taken Report (ATR) that will be tabled along with the Liberhan Commission report. The decision was taken after consultations with Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, who is in Washington. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The government was initially reluctant to accept the Opposition's demand given the fact that the Commission’s report was yet to be translated into Hindi and there was only one copy of the report available. It, however, decided to go ahead given the apprehension that the Opposition would continue to stall proceedings of the House on the issue. The Opposition’s demand came after The Indian Express’s story on the findings of the Liberhan Commission on Monday. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Meanwhile, amid controversy over “leakage” of the Liberhan Commission report, the Congress on Monday attacked the Opposition party saying that “the guilt and culpability” for the demolition of Babri Masjid lay with “the BJP and its affiliates”. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >“Events leading to December 6, 1992, played out in full public view and culminated in the conviction of Kalyan Singh for misleading the court. Perceptionally, the issue in the minds of the people is already settled as to who is responsible and who is guilty. Perceptionally, the issue is already settled as far as guilt and culpability is concerned. It lies primarily with the BJP and its affiliates,” Congress spokesman Manish Tewari told reporters. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Earlier in the day, Home Minister P Chidambaram said in both Houses that the report would be tabled during the current session and pointed out that since Justice M S Liberhan had submitted the report on June 30, the Government was required to place it before the two Houses together with the ATR within six months from that date. Chidambaram said he would “refrain from commenting on the correctness or otherwise of the contents of the news story.” </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Stoutly denying the suggestion that the leakage of the report could be traced to his ministry, he said there was only one copy of the report in the Home ministry which was in “safe custody.” “No one from the Ministry of Home Affairs has spoken to any journalist about the report,” he reiterated. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Both Houses underwent two adjournments — the first around 11.30 am and the second after noon — to finally adjourn for the day after 2 pm. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >In the Lok Sabha, Leader of Opposition L K Advani, who had given a notice for the suspension of Question Hour, sought to know who had leaked the contents of the report. He said when one of his colleagues had asked the editor of The Indian Express about the report, he had said, “I can tell you, it is authentic. There is nothing imaginary about what we have published.” </font></p><p align="justify"><font >“Had there been my indictment, my party’s indictment, one could understand, but looking at the mention of Vajpayee, I felt it is my duty (to speak up for him),” Advani said.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >He said after the publication of this report, the government did not have the right to delay its tabling even for a day. Advani said the government should table the report also because The Indian Express report carried a footnote that it would be continued. He said this also amounted to a breach of privilege, but that was a different issue. “I have not taken recourse to a privilege motion,” he said. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >SP leader Mulayam Singh Yadav, CPI(M) leader Basudeb Acharia, BSP leader Dhara Singh Chauhan and BJD leader Arjun Charan Sethi also asked the government to table the report. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Meanwhile, in the Rajya Sabha, Leader of Opposition Arun Jaitley raised the issue as soon as the House met. Jaitley said the leakage of the report had lowered the dignity of Parliament, and that the source of leakage is indicated in the report itself as it refers to sources in the Union Home Ministry. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >After Chidambaram’s denial, Jaitley said if that was the case then the “breach of the privilege of this House has taken place at the behest of the Commission” since the only other copy is with the latter. He sought an inquiry into the matter. </font></p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f889eef85-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f889eef85-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6804f889eef85-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f889eef85-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f889eef85-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f889eef85-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f889eef85-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6804f889eef85-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6804f889eef85-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 428, 'title' => 'Babri demolition report to be tabled in Parliament today', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The UPA government has given in to the Opposition&rsquo;s demand to immediately table the Liberhan Commission report in Parliament. To this end, a meeting of the Union Cabinet was convened on Tuesday morning to approve the Action Taken Report (ATR) that will be tabled along with the Liberhan Commission report. The decision was taken after consultations with Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, who is in Washington. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The government was initially reluctant to accept the Opposition's demand given the fact that the Commission&rsquo;s report was yet to be translated into Hindi and there was only one copy of the report available. It, however, decided to go ahead given the apprehension that the Opposition would continue to stall proceedings of the House on the issue. The Opposition&rsquo;s demand came after The Indian Express&rsquo;s story on the findings of the Liberhan Commission on Monday. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Meanwhile, amid controversy over &ldquo;leakage&rdquo; of the Liberhan Commission report, the Congress on Monday attacked the Opposition party saying that &ldquo;the guilt and culpability&rdquo; for the demolition of Babri Masjid lay with &ldquo;the BJP and its affiliates&rdquo;. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;Events leading to December 6, 1992, played out in full public view and culminated in the conviction of Kalyan Singh for misleading the court. Perceptionally, the issue in the minds of the people is already settled as to who is responsible and who is guilty. Perceptionally, the issue is already settled as far as guilt and culpability is concerned. It lies primarily with the BJP and its affiliates,&rdquo; Congress spokesman Manish Tewari told reporters. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Earlier in the day, Home Minister P Chidambaram said in both Houses that the report would be tabled during the current session and pointed out that since Justice M S Liberhan had submitted the report on June 30, the Government was required to place it before the two Houses together with the ATR within six months from that date. Chidambaram said he would &ldquo;refrain from commenting on the correctness or otherwise of the contents of the news story.&rdquo; </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Stoutly denying the suggestion that the leakage of the report could be traced to his ministry, he said there was only one copy of the report in the Home ministry which was in &ldquo;safe custody.&rdquo; &ldquo;No one from the Ministry of Home Affairs has spoken to any journalist about the report,&rdquo; he reiterated. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Both Houses underwent two adjournments &mdash; the first around 11.30 am and the second after noon &mdash; to finally adjourn for the day after 2 pm. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In the Lok Sabha, Leader of Opposition L K Advani, who had given a notice for the suspension of Question Hour, sought to know who had leaked the contents of the report. He said when one of his colleagues had asked the editor of The Indian Express about the report, he had said, &ldquo;I can tell you, it is authentic. There is nothing imaginary about what we have published.&rdquo; </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;Had there been my indictment, my party&rsquo;s indictment, one could understand, but looking at the mention of Vajpayee, I felt it is my duty (to speak up for him),&rdquo; Advani said.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">He said after the publication of this report, the government did not have the right to delay its tabling even for a day. Advani said the government should table the report also because The Indian Express report carried a footnote that it would be continued. He said this also amounted to a breach of privilege, but that was a different issue. &ldquo;I have not taken recourse to a privilege motion,&rdquo; he said. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">SP leader Mulayam Singh Yadav, CPI(M) leader Basudeb Acharia, BSP leader Dhara Singh Chauhan and BJD leader Arjun Charan Sethi also asked the government to table the report. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Meanwhile, in the Rajya Sabha, Leader of Opposition Arun Jaitley raised the issue as soon as the House met. Jaitley said the leakage of the report had lowered the dignity of Parliament, and that the source of leakage is indicated in the report itself as it refers to sources in the Union Home Ministry. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">After Chidambaram&rsquo;s denial, Jaitley said if that was the case then the &ldquo;breach of the privilege of this House has taken place at the behest of the Commission&rdquo; since the only other copy is with the latter. He sought an inquiry into the matter. </font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 24 November, 2009, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/babri-demolition-report-to-be-tabled-in-parl-today/545508/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'babri-demolition-report-to-be-tabled-in-parliament-today-497', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 497, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [[maximum depth reached]], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 428, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Babri demolition report to be tabled in Parliament today', 'metaKeywords' => null, 'metaDesc' => ' The UPA government has given in to the Opposition&rsquo;s demand to immediately table the Liberhan Commission report in Parliament. To this end, a meeting of the Union Cabinet was convened on Tuesday morning to approve the Action Taken Report (ATR)...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The UPA government has given in to the Opposition&rsquo;s demand to immediately table the Liberhan Commission report in Parliament. To this end, a meeting of the Union Cabinet was convened on Tuesday morning to approve the Action Taken Report (ATR) that will be tabled along with the Liberhan Commission report. The decision was taken after consultations with Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, who is in Washington. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The government was initially reluctant to accept the Opposition's demand given the fact that the Commission&rsquo;s report was yet to be translated into Hindi and there was only one copy of the report available. It, however, decided to go ahead given the apprehension that the Opposition would continue to stall proceedings of the House on the issue. The Opposition&rsquo;s demand came after The Indian Express&rsquo;s story on the findings of the Liberhan Commission on Monday. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Meanwhile, amid controversy over &ldquo;leakage&rdquo; of the Liberhan Commission report, the Congress on Monday attacked the Opposition party saying that &ldquo;the guilt and culpability&rdquo; for the demolition of Babri Masjid lay with &ldquo;the BJP and its affiliates&rdquo;. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >&ldquo;Events leading to December 6, 1992, played out in full public view and culminated in the conviction of Kalyan Singh for misleading the court. Perceptionally, the issue in the minds of the people is already settled as to who is responsible and who is guilty. Perceptionally, the issue is already settled as far as guilt and culpability is concerned. It lies primarily with the BJP and its affiliates,&rdquo; Congress spokesman Manish Tewari told reporters. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Earlier in the day, Home Minister P Chidambaram said in both Houses that the report would be tabled during the current session and pointed out that since Justice M S Liberhan had submitted the report on June 30, the Government was required to place it before the two Houses together with the ATR within six months from that date. Chidambaram said he would &ldquo;refrain from commenting on the correctness or otherwise of the contents of the news story.&rdquo; </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Stoutly denying the suggestion that the leakage of the report could be traced to his ministry, he said there was only one copy of the report in the Home ministry which was in &ldquo;safe custody.&rdquo; &ldquo;No one from the Ministry of Home Affairs has spoken to any journalist about the report,&rdquo; he reiterated. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Both Houses underwent two adjournments &mdash; the first around 11.30 am and the second after noon &mdash; to finally adjourn for the day after 2 pm. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >In the Lok Sabha, Leader of Opposition L K Advani, who had given a notice for the suspension of Question Hour, sought to know who had leaked the contents of the report. He said when one of his colleagues had asked the editor of The Indian Express about the report, he had said, &ldquo;I can tell you, it is authentic. There is nothing imaginary about what we have published.&rdquo; </font></p><p align="justify"><font >&ldquo;Had there been my indictment, my party&rsquo;s indictment, one could understand, but looking at the mention of Vajpayee, I felt it is my duty (to speak up for him),&rdquo; Advani said.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >He said after the publication of this report, the government did not have the right to delay its tabling even for a day. Advani said the government should table the report also because The Indian Express report carried a footnote that it would be continued. He said this also amounted to a breach of privilege, but that was a different issue. &ldquo;I have not taken recourse to a privilege motion,&rdquo; he said. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >SP leader Mulayam Singh Yadav, CPI(M) leader Basudeb Acharia, BSP leader Dhara Singh Chauhan and BJD leader Arjun Charan Sethi also asked the government to table the report. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Meanwhile, in the Rajya Sabha, Leader of Opposition Arun Jaitley raised the issue as soon as the House met. Jaitley said the leakage of the report had lowered the dignity of Parliament, and that the source of leakage is indicated in the report itself as it refers to sources in the Union Home Ministry. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >After Chidambaram&rsquo;s denial, Jaitley said if that was the case then the &ldquo;breach of the privilege of this House has taken place at the behest of the Commission&rdquo; since the only other copy is with the latter. He sought an inquiry into the matter. </font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 428, 'title' => 'Babri demolition report to be tabled in Parliament today', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The UPA government has given in to the Opposition&rsquo;s demand to immediately table the Liberhan Commission report in Parliament. To this end, a meeting of the Union Cabinet was convened on Tuesday morning to approve the Action Taken Report (ATR) that will be tabled along with the Liberhan Commission report. The decision was taken after consultations with Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, who is in Washington. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The government was initially reluctant to accept the Opposition's demand given the fact that the Commission&rsquo;s report was yet to be translated into Hindi and there was only one copy of the report available. It, however, decided to go ahead given the apprehension that the Opposition would continue to stall proceedings of the House on the issue. The Opposition&rsquo;s demand came after The Indian Express&rsquo;s story on the findings of the Liberhan Commission on Monday. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Meanwhile, amid controversy over &ldquo;leakage&rdquo; of the Liberhan Commission report, the Congress on Monday attacked the Opposition party saying that &ldquo;the guilt and culpability&rdquo; for the demolition of Babri Masjid lay with &ldquo;the BJP and its affiliates&rdquo;. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;Events leading to December 6, 1992, played out in full public view and culminated in the conviction of Kalyan Singh for misleading the court. Perceptionally, the issue in the minds of the people is already settled as to who is responsible and who is guilty. Perceptionally, the issue is already settled as far as guilt and culpability is concerned. It lies primarily with the BJP and its affiliates,&rdquo; Congress spokesman Manish Tewari told reporters. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Earlier in the day, Home Minister P Chidambaram said in both Houses that the report would be tabled during the current session and pointed out that since Justice M S Liberhan had submitted the report on June 30, the Government was required to place it before the two Houses together with the ATR within six months from that date. Chidambaram said he would &ldquo;refrain from commenting on the correctness or otherwise of the contents of the news story.&rdquo; </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Stoutly denying the suggestion that the leakage of the report could be traced to his ministry, he said there was only one copy of the report in the Home ministry which was in &ldquo;safe custody.&rdquo; &ldquo;No one from the Ministry of Home Affairs has spoken to any journalist about the report,&rdquo; he reiterated. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Both Houses underwent two adjournments &mdash; the first around 11.30 am and the second after noon &mdash; to finally adjourn for the day after 2 pm. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In the Lok Sabha, Leader of Opposition L K Advani, who had given a notice for the suspension of Question Hour, sought to know who had leaked the contents of the report. He said when one of his colleagues had asked the editor of The Indian Express about the report, he had said, &ldquo;I can tell you, it is authentic. There is nothing imaginary about what we have published.&rdquo; </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;Had there been my indictment, my party&rsquo;s indictment, one could understand, but looking at the mention of Vajpayee, I felt it is my duty (to speak up for him),&rdquo; Advani said.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">He said after the publication of this report, the government did not have the right to delay its tabling even for a day. Advani said the government should table the report also because The Indian Express report carried a footnote that it would be continued. He said this also amounted to a breach of privilege, but that was a different issue. &ldquo;I have not taken recourse to a privilege motion,&rdquo; he said. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">SP leader Mulayam Singh Yadav, CPI(M) leader Basudeb Acharia, BSP leader Dhara Singh Chauhan and BJD leader Arjun Charan Sethi also asked the government to table the report. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Meanwhile, in the Rajya Sabha, Leader of Opposition Arun Jaitley raised the issue as soon as the House met. Jaitley said the leakage of the report had lowered the dignity of Parliament, and that the source of leakage is indicated in the report itself as it refers to sources in the Union Home Ministry. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">After Chidambaram&rsquo;s denial, Jaitley said if that was the case then the &ldquo;breach of the privilege of this House has taken place at the behest of the Commission&rdquo; since the only other copy is with the latter. He sought an inquiry into the matter. </font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 24 November, 2009, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/babri-demolition-report-to-be-tabled-in-parl-today/545508/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'babri-demolition-report-to-be-tabled-in-parliament-today-497', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 497, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 428 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Babri demolition report to be tabled in Parliament today' $metaKeywords = null $metaDesc = ' The UPA government has given in to the Opposition&rsquo;s demand to immediately table the Liberhan Commission report in Parliament. To this end, a meeting of the Union Cabinet was convened on Tuesday morning to approve the Action Taken Report (ATR)...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The UPA government has given in to the Opposition&rsquo;s demand to immediately table the Liberhan Commission report in Parliament. To this end, a meeting of the Union Cabinet was convened on Tuesday morning to approve the Action Taken Report (ATR) that will be tabled along with the Liberhan Commission report. The decision was taken after consultations with Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, who is in Washington. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The government was initially reluctant to accept the Opposition's demand given the fact that the Commission&rsquo;s report was yet to be translated into Hindi and there was only one copy of the report available. It, however, decided to go ahead given the apprehension that the Opposition would continue to stall proceedings of the House on the issue. The Opposition&rsquo;s demand came after The Indian Express&rsquo;s story on the findings of the Liberhan Commission on Monday. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Meanwhile, amid controversy over &ldquo;leakage&rdquo; of the Liberhan Commission report, the Congress on Monday attacked the Opposition party saying that &ldquo;the guilt and culpability&rdquo; for the demolition of Babri Masjid lay with &ldquo;the BJP and its affiliates&rdquo;. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >&ldquo;Events leading to December 6, 1992, played out in full public view and culminated in the conviction of Kalyan Singh for misleading the court. Perceptionally, the issue in the minds of the people is already settled as to who is responsible and who is guilty. Perceptionally, the issue is already settled as far as guilt and culpability is concerned. It lies primarily with the BJP and its affiliates,&rdquo; Congress spokesman Manish Tewari told reporters. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Earlier in the day, Home Minister P Chidambaram said in both Houses that the report would be tabled during the current session and pointed out that since Justice M S Liberhan had submitted the report on June 30, the Government was required to place it before the two Houses together with the ATR within six months from that date. Chidambaram said he would &ldquo;refrain from commenting on the correctness or otherwise of the contents of the news story.&rdquo; </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Stoutly denying the suggestion that the leakage of the report could be traced to his ministry, he said there was only one copy of the report in the Home ministry which was in &ldquo;safe custody.&rdquo; &ldquo;No one from the Ministry of Home Affairs has spoken to any journalist about the report,&rdquo; he reiterated. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Both Houses underwent two adjournments &mdash; the first around 11.30 am and the second after noon &mdash; to finally adjourn for the day after 2 pm. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >In the Lok Sabha, Leader of Opposition L K Advani, who had given a notice for the suspension of Question Hour, sought to know who had leaked the contents of the report. He said when one of his colleagues had asked the editor of The Indian Express about the report, he had said, &ldquo;I can tell you, it is authentic. There is nothing imaginary about what we have published.&rdquo; </font></p><p align="justify"><font >&ldquo;Had there been my indictment, my party&rsquo;s indictment, one could understand, but looking at the mention of Vajpayee, I felt it is my duty (to speak up for him),&rdquo; Advani said.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >He said after the publication of this report, the government did not have the right to delay its tabling even for a day. Advani said the government should table the report also because The Indian Express report carried a footnote that it would be continued. He said this also amounted to a breach of privilege, but that was a different issue. &ldquo;I have not taken recourse to a privilege motion,&rdquo; he said. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >SP leader Mulayam Singh Yadav, CPI(M) leader Basudeb Acharia, BSP leader Dhara Singh Chauhan and BJD leader Arjun Charan Sethi also asked the government to table the report. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Meanwhile, in the Rajya Sabha, Leader of Opposition Arun Jaitley raised the issue as soon as the House met. Jaitley said the leakage of the report had lowered the dignity of Parliament, and that the source of leakage is indicated in the report itself as it refers to sources in the Union Home Ministry. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >After Chidambaram&rsquo;s denial, Jaitley said if that was the case then the &ldquo;breach of the privilege of this House has taken place at the behest of the Commission&rdquo; since the only other copy is with the latter. He sought an inquiry into the matter. </font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/babri-demolition-report-to-be-tabled-in-parliament-today-497.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Babri demolition report to be tabled in Parliament today | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" The UPA government has given in to the Opposition’s demand to immediately table the Liberhan Commission report in Parliament. To this end, a meeting of the Union Cabinet was convened on Tuesday morning to approve the Action Taken Report (ATR)..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Babri demolition report to be tabled in Parliament today</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The UPA government has given in to the Opposition’s demand to immediately table the Liberhan Commission report in Parliament. To this end, a meeting of the Union Cabinet was convened on Tuesday morning to approve the Action Taken Report (ATR) that will be tabled along with the Liberhan Commission report. The decision was taken after consultations with Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, who is in Washington. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The government was initially reluctant to accept the Opposition's demand given the fact that the Commission’s report was yet to be translated into Hindi and there was only one copy of the report available. It, however, decided to go ahead given the apprehension that the Opposition would continue to stall proceedings of the House on the issue. The Opposition’s demand came after The Indian Express’s story on the findings of the Liberhan Commission on Monday. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Meanwhile, amid controversy over “leakage” of the Liberhan Commission report, the Congress on Monday attacked the Opposition party saying that “the guilt and culpability” for the demolition of Babri Masjid lay with “the BJP and its affiliates”. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >“Events leading to December 6, 1992, played out in full public view and culminated in the conviction of Kalyan Singh for misleading the court. Perceptionally, the issue in the minds of the people is already settled as to who is responsible and who is guilty. Perceptionally, the issue is already settled as far as guilt and culpability is concerned. It lies primarily with the BJP and its affiliates,” Congress spokesman Manish Tewari told reporters. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Earlier in the day, Home Minister P Chidambaram said in both Houses that the report would be tabled during the current session and pointed out that since Justice M S Liberhan had submitted the report on June 30, the Government was required to place it before the two Houses together with the ATR within six months from that date. Chidambaram said he would “refrain from commenting on the correctness or otherwise of the contents of the news story.” </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Stoutly denying the suggestion that the leakage of the report could be traced to his ministry, he said there was only one copy of the report in the Home ministry which was in “safe custody.” “No one from the Ministry of Home Affairs has spoken to any journalist about the report,” he reiterated. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Both Houses underwent two adjournments — the first around 11.30 am and the second after noon — to finally adjourn for the day after 2 pm. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >In the Lok Sabha, Leader of Opposition L K Advani, who had given a notice for the suspension of Question Hour, sought to know who had leaked the contents of the report. He said when one of his colleagues had asked the editor of The Indian Express about the report, he had said, “I can tell you, it is authentic. There is nothing imaginary about what we have published.” </font></p><p align="justify"><font >“Had there been my indictment, my party’s indictment, one could understand, but looking at the mention of Vajpayee, I felt it is my duty (to speak up for him),” Advani said.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >He said after the publication of this report, the government did not have the right to delay its tabling even for a day. Advani said the government should table the report also because The Indian Express report carried a footnote that it would be continued. He said this also amounted to a breach of privilege, but that was a different issue. “I have not taken recourse to a privilege motion,” he said. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >SP leader Mulayam Singh Yadav, CPI(M) leader Basudeb Acharia, BSP leader Dhara Singh Chauhan and BJD leader Arjun Charan Sethi also asked the government to table the report. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Meanwhile, in the Rajya Sabha, Leader of Opposition Arun Jaitley raised the issue as soon as the House met. Jaitley said the leakage of the report had lowered the dignity of Parliament, and that the source of leakage is indicated in the report itself as it refers to sources in the Union Home Ministry. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >After Chidambaram’s denial, Jaitley said if that was the case then the “breach of the privilege of this House has taken place at the behest of the Commission” since the only other copy is with the latter. He sought an inquiry into the matter. </font></p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f889eef85-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f889eef85-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6804f889eef85-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f889eef85-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f889eef85-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f889eef85-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6804f889eef85-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6804f889eef85-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6804f889eef85-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 428, 'title' => 'Babri demolition report to be tabled in Parliament today', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The UPA government has given in to the Opposition&rsquo;s demand to immediately table the Liberhan Commission report in Parliament. To this end, a meeting of the Union Cabinet was convened on Tuesday morning to approve the Action Taken Report (ATR) that will be tabled along with the Liberhan Commission report. The decision was taken after consultations with Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, who is in Washington. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The government was initially reluctant to accept the Opposition's demand given the fact that the Commission&rsquo;s report was yet to be translated into Hindi and there was only one copy of the report available. It, however, decided to go ahead given the apprehension that the Opposition would continue to stall proceedings of the House on the issue. The Opposition&rsquo;s demand came after The Indian Express&rsquo;s story on the findings of the Liberhan Commission on Monday. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Meanwhile, amid controversy over &ldquo;leakage&rdquo; of the Liberhan Commission report, the Congress on Monday attacked the Opposition party saying that &ldquo;the guilt and culpability&rdquo; for the demolition of Babri Masjid lay with &ldquo;the BJP and its affiliates&rdquo;. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;Events leading to December 6, 1992, played out in full public view and culminated in the conviction of Kalyan Singh for misleading the court. Perceptionally, the issue in the minds of the people is already settled as to who is responsible and who is guilty. Perceptionally, the issue is already settled as far as guilt and culpability is concerned. It lies primarily with the BJP and its affiliates,&rdquo; Congress spokesman Manish Tewari told reporters. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Earlier in the day, Home Minister P Chidambaram said in both Houses that the report would be tabled during the current session and pointed out that since Justice M S Liberhan had submitted the report on June 30, the Government was required to place it before the two Houses together with the ATR within six months from that date. Chidambaram said he would &ldquo;refrain from commenting on the correctness or otherwise of the contents of the news story.&rdquo; </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Stoutly denying the suggestion that the leakage of the report could be traced to his ministry, he said there was only one copy of the report in the Home ministry which was in &ldquo;safe custody.&rdquo; &ldquo;No one from the Ministry of Home Affairs has spoken to any journalist about the report,&rdquo; he reiterated. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Both Houses underwent two adjournments &mdash; the first around 11.30 am and the second after noon &mdash; to finally adjourn for the day after 2 pm. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In the Lok Sabha, Leader of Opposition L K Advani, who had given a notice for the suspension of Question Hour, sought to know who had leaked the contents of the report. He said when one of his colleagues had asked the editor of The Indian Express about the report, he had said, &ldquo;I can tell you, it is authentic. There is nothing imaginary about what we have published.&rdquo; </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;Had there been my indictment, my party&rsquo;s indictment, one could understand, but looking at the mention of Vajpayee, I felt it is my duty (to speak up for him),&rdquo; Advani said.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">He said after the publication of this report, the government did not have the right to delay its tabling even for a day. Advani said the government should table the report also because The Indian Express report carried a footnote that it would be continued. He said this also amounted to a breach of privilege, but that was a different issue. &ldquo;I have not taken recourse to a privilege motion,&rdquo; he said. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">SP leader Mulayam Singh Yadav, CPI(M) leader Basudeb Acharia, BSP leader Dhara Singh Chauhan and BJD leader Arjun Charan Sethi also asked the government to table the report. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Meanwhile, in the Rajya Sabha, Leader of Opposition Arun Jaitley raised the issue as soon as the House met. Jaitley said the leakage of the report had lowered the dignity of Parliament, and that the source of leakage is indicated in the report itself as it refers to sources in the Union Home Ministry. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">After Chidambaram&rsquo;s denial, Jaitley said if that was the case then the &ldquo;breach of the privilege of this House has taken place at the behest of the Commission&rdquo; since the only other copy is with the latter. He sought an inquiry into the matter. </font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 24 November, 2009, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/babri-demolition-report-to-be-tabled-in-parl-today/545508/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'babri-demolition-report-to-be-tabled-in-parliament-today-497', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 497, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [[maximum depth reached]], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 428, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Babri demolition report to be tabled in Parliament today', 'metaKeywords' => null, 'metaDesc' => ' The UPA government has given in to the Opposition&rsquo;s demand to immediately table the Liberhan Commission report in Parliament. To this end, a meeting of the Union Cabinet was convened on Tuesday morning to approve the Action Taken Report (ATR)...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The UPA government has given in to the Opposition&rsquo;s demand to immediately table the Liberhan Commission report in Parliament. To this end, a meeting of the Union Cabinet was convened on Tuesday morning to approve the Action Taken Report (ATR) that will be tabled along with the Liberhan Commission report. The decision was taken after consultations with Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, who is in Washington. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The government was initially reluctant to accept the Opposition's demand given the fact that the Commission&rsquo;s report was yet to be translated into Hindi and there was only one copy of the report available. It, however, decided to go ahead given the apprehension that the Opposition would continue to stall proceedings of the House on the issue. The Opposition&rsquo;s demand came after The Indian Express&rsquo;s story on the findings of the Liberhan Commission on Monday. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Meanwhile, amid controversy over &ldquo;leakage&rdquo; of the Liberhan Commission report, the Congress on Monday attacked the Opposition party saying that &ldquo;the guilt and culpability&rdquo; for the demolition of Babri Masjid lay with &ldquo;the BJP and its affiliates&rdquo;. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >&ldquo;Events leading to December 6, 1992, played out in full public view and culminated in the conviction of Kalyan Singh for misleading the court. Perceptionally, the issue in the minds of the people is already settled as to who is responsible and who is guilty. Perceptionally, the issue is already settled as far as guilt and culpability is concerned. It lies primarily with the BJP and its affiliates,&rdquo; Congress spokesman Manish Tewari told reporters. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Earlier in the day, Home Minister P Chidambaram said in both Houses that the report would be tabled during the current session and pointed out that since Justice M S Liberhan had submitted the report on June 30, the Government was required to place it before the two Houses together with the ATR within six months from that date. Chidambaram said he would &ldquo;refrain from commenting on the correctness or otherwise of the contents of the news story.&rdquo; </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Stoutly denying the suggestion that the leakage of the report could be traced to his ministry, he said there was only one copy of the report in the Home ministry which was in &ldquo;safe custody.&rdquo; &ldquo;No one from the Ministry of Home Affairs has spoken to any journalist about the report,&rdquo; he reiterated. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Both Houses underwent two adjournments &mdash; the first around 11.30 am and the second after noon &mdash; to finally adjourn for the day after 2 pm. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >In the Lok Sabha, Leader of Opposition L K Advani, who had given a notice for the suspension of Question Hour, sought to know who had leaked the contents of the report. He said when one of his colleagues had asked the editor of The Indian Express about the report, he had said, &ldquo;I can tell you, it is authentic. There is nothing imaginary about what we have published.&rdquo; </font></p><p align="justify"><font >&ldquo;Had there been my indictment, my party&rsquo;s indictment, one could understand, but looking at the mention of Vajpayee, I felt it is my duty (to speak up for him),&rdquo; Advani said.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >He said after the publication of this report, the government did not have the right to delay its tabling even for a day. Advani said the government should table the report also because The Indian Express report carried a footnote that it would be continued. He said this also amounted to a breach of privilege, but that was a different issue. &ldquo;I have not taken recourse to a privilege motion,&rdquo; he said. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >SP leader Mulayam Singh Yadav, CPI(M) leader Basudeb Acharia, BSP leader Dhara Singh Chauhan and BJD leader Arjun Charan Sethi also asked the government to table the report. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Meanwhile, in the Rajya Sabha, Leader of Opposition Arun Jaitley raised the issue as soon as the House met. Jaitley said the leakage of the report had lowered the dignity of Parliament, and that the source of leakage is indicated in the report itself as it refers to sources in the Union Home Ministry. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >After Chidambaram&rsquo;s denial, Jaitley said if that was the case then the &ldquo;breach of the privilege of this House has taken place at the behest of the Commission&rdquo; since the only other copy is with the latter. He sought an inquiry into the matter. </font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 428, 'title' => 'Babri demolition report to be tabled in Parliament today', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The UPA government has given in to the Opposition&rsquo;s demand to immediately table the Liberhan Commission report in Parliament. To this end, a meeting of the Union Cabinet was convened on Tuesday morning to approve the Action Taken Report (ATR) that will be tabled along with the Liberhan Commission report. The decision was taken after consultations with Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, who is in Washington. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The government was initially reluctant to accept the Opposition's demand given the fact that the Commission&rsquo;s report was yet to be translated into Hindi and there was only one copy of the report available. It, however, decided to go ahead given the apprehension that the Opposition would continue to stall proceedings of the House on the issue. The Opposition&rsquo;s demand came after The Indian Express&rsquo;s story on the findings of the Liberhan Commission on Monday. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Meanwhile, amid controversy over &ldquo;leakage&rdquo; of the Liberhan Commission report, the Congress on Monday attacked the Opposition party saying that &ldquo;the guilt and culpability&rdquo; for the demolition of Babri Masjid lay with &ldquo;the BJP and its affiliates&rdquo;. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;Events leading to December 6, 1992, played out in full public view and culminated in the conviction of Kalyan Singh for misleading the court. Perceptionally, the issue in the minds of the people is already settled as to who is responsible and who is guilty. Perceptionally, the issue is already settled as far as guilt and culpability is concerned. It lies primarily with the BJP and its affiliates,&rdquo; Congress spokesman Manish Tewari told reporters. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Earlier in the day, Home Minister P Chidambaram said in both Houses that the report would be tabled during the current session and pointed out that since Justice M S Liberhan had submitted the report on June 30, the Government was required to place it before the two Houses together with the ATR within six months from that date. Chidambaram said he would &ldquo;refrain from commenting on the correctness or otherwise of the contents of the news story.&rdquo; </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Stoutly denying the suggestion that the leakage of the report could be traced to his ministry, he said there was only one copy of the report in the Home ministry which was in &ldquo;safe custody.&rdquo; &ldquo;No one from the Ministry of Home Affairs has spoken to any journalist about the report,&rdquo; he reiterated. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Both Houses underwent two adjournments &mdash; the first around 11.30 am and the second after noon &mdash; to finally adjourn for the day after 2 pm. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In the Lok Sabha, Leader of Opposition L K Advani, who had given a notice for the suspension of Question Hour, sought to know who had leaked the contents of the report. He said when one of his colleagues had asked the editor of The Indian Express about the report, he had said, &ldquo;I can tell you, it is authentic. There is nothing imaginary about what we have published.&rdquo; </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">&ldquo;Had there been my indictment, my party&rsquo;s indictment, one could understand, but looking at the mention of Vajpayee, I felt it is my duty (to speak up for him),&rdquo; Advani said.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">He said after the publication of this report, the government did not have the right to delay its tabling even for a day. Advani said the government should table the report also because The Indian Express report carried a footnote that it would be continued. He said this also amounted to a breach of privilege, but that was a different issue. &ldquo;I have not taken recourse to a privilege motion,&rdquo; he said. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">SP leader Mulayam Singh Yadav, CPI(M) leader Basudeb Acharia, BSP leader Dhara Singh Chauhan and BJD leader Arjun Charan Sethi also asked the government to table the report. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Meanwhile, in the Rajya Sabha, Leader of Opposition Arun Jaitley raised the issue as soon as the House met. Jaitley said the leakage of the report had lowered the dignity of Parliament, and that the source of leakage is indicated in the report itself as it refers to sources in the Union Home Ministry. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">After Chidambaram&rsquo;s denial, Jaitley said if that was the case then the &ldquo;breach of the privilege of this House has taken place at the behest of the Commission&rdquo; since the only other copy is with the latter. He sought an inquiry into the matter. </font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 24 November, 2009, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/babri-demolition-report-to-be-tabled-in-parl-today/545508/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'babri-demolition-report-to-be-tabled-in-parliament-today-497', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 497, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 428 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Babri demolition report to be tabled in Parliament today' $metaKeywords = null $metaDesc = ' The UPA government has given in to the Opposition&rsquo;s demand to immediately table the Liberhan Commission report in Parliament. To this end, a meeting of the Union Cabinet was convened on Tuesday morning to approve the Action Taken Report (ATR)...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The UPA government has given in to the Opposition&rsquo;s demand to immediately table the Liberhan Commission report in Parliament. To this end, a meeting of the Union Cabinet was convened on Tuesday morning to approve the Action Taken Report (ATR) that will be tabled along with the Liberhan Commission report. The decision was taken after consultations with Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, who is in Washington. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The government was initially reluctant to accept the Opposition's demand given the fact that the Commission&rsquo;s report was yet to be translated into Hindi and there was only one copy of the report available. It, however, decided to go ahead given the apprehension that the Opposition would continue to stall proceedings of the House on the issue. The Opposition&rsquo;s demand came after The Indian Express&rsquo;s story on the findings of the Liberhan Commission on Monday. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Meanwhile, amid controversy over &ldquo;leakage&rdquo; of the Liberhan Commission report, the Congress on Monday attacked the Opposition party saying that &ldquo;the guilt and culpability&rdquo; for the demolition of Babri Masjid lay with &ldquo;the BJP and its affiliates&rdquo;. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >&ldquo;Events leading to December 6, 1992, played out in full public view and culminated in the conviction of Kalyan Singh for misleading the court. Perceptionally, the issue in the minds of the people is already settled as to who is responsible and who is guilty. Perceptionally, the issue is already settled as far as guilt and culpability is concerned. It lies primarily with the BJP and its affiliates,&rdquo; Congress spokesman Manish Tewari told reporters. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Earlier in the day, Home Minister P Chidambaram said in both Houses that the report would be tabled during the current session and pointed out that since Justice M S Liberhan had submitted the report on June 30, the Government was required to place it before the two Houses together with the ATR within six months from that date. Chidambaram said he would &ldquo;refrain from commenting on the correctness or otherwise of the contents of the news story.&rdquo; </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Stoutly denying the suggestion that the leakage of the report could be traced to his ministry, he said there was only one copy of the report in the Home ministry which was in &ldquo;safe custody.&rdquo; &ldquo;No one from the Ministry of Home Affairs has spoken to any journalist about the report,&rdquo; he reiterated. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Both Houses underwent two adjournments &mdash; the first around 11.30 am and the second after noon &mdash; to finally adjourn for the day after 2 pm. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >In the Lok Sabha, Leader of Opposition L K Advani, who had given a notice for the suspension of Question Hour, sought to know who had leaked the contents of the report. He said when one of his colleagues had asked the editor of The Indian Express about the report, he had said, &ldquo;I can tell you, it is authentic. There is nothing imaginary about what we have published.&rdquo; </font></p><p align="justify"><font >&ldquo;Had there been my indictment, my party&rsquo;s indictment, one could understand, but looking at the mention of Vajpayee, I felt it is my duty (to speak up for him),&rdquo; Advani said.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >He said after the publication of this report, the government did not have the right to delay its tabling even for a day. Advani said the government should table the report also because The Indian Express report carried a footnote that it would be continued. He said this also amounted to a breach of privilege, but that was a different issue. &ldquo;I have not taken recourse to a privilege motion,&rdquo; he said. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >SP leader Mulayam Singh Yadav, CPI(M) leader Basudeb Acharia, BSP leader Dhara Singh Chauhan and BJD leader Arjun Charan Sethi also asked the government to table the report. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Meanwhile, in the Rajya Sabha, Leader of Opposition Arun Jaitley raised the issue as soon as the House met. Jaitley said the leakage of the report had lowered the dignity of Parliament, and that the source of leakage is indicated in the report itself as it refers to sources in the Union Home Ministry. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >After Chidambaram&rsquo;s denial, Jaitley said if that was the case then the &ldquo;breach of the privilege of this House has taken place at the behest of the Commission&rdquo; since the only other copy is with the latter. He sought an inquiry into the matter. </font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/babri-demolition-report-to-be-tabled-in-parliament-today-497.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Babri demolition report to be tabled in Parliament today | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" The UPA government has given in to the Opposition’s demand to immediately table the Liberhan Commission report in Parliament. To this end, a meeting of the Union Cabinet was convened on Tuesday morning to approve the Action Taken Report (ATR)..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Babri demolition report to be tabled in Parliament today</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The UPA government has given in to the Opposition’s demand to immediately table the Liberhan Commission report in Parliament. To this end, a meeting of the Union Cabinet was convened on Tuesday morning to approve the Action Taken Report (ATR) that will be tabled along with the Liberhan Commission report. The decision was taken after consultations with Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, who is in Washington. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The government was initially reluctant to accept the Opposition's demand given the fact that the Commission’s report was yet to be translated into Hindi and there was only one copy of the report available. It, however, decided to go ahead given the apprehension that the Opposition would continue to stall proceedings of the House on the issue. The Opposition’s demand came after The Indian Express’s story on the findings of the Liberhan Commission on Monday. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Meanwhile, amid controversy over “leakage” of the Liberhan Commission report, the Congress on Monday attacked the Opposition party saying that “the guilt and culpability” for the demolition of Babri Masjid lay with “the BJP and its affiliates”. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >“Events leading to December 6, 1992, played out in full public view and culminated in the conviction of Kalyan Singh for misleading the court. Perceptionally, the issue in the minds of the people is already settled as to who is responsible and who is guilty. Perceptionally, the issue is already settled as far as guilt and culpability is concerned. It lies primarily with the BJP and its affiliates,” Congress spokesman Manish Tewari told reporters. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Earlier in the day, Home Minister P Chidambaram said in both Houses that the report would be tabled during the current session and pointed out that since Justice M S Liberhan had submitted the report on June 30, the Government was required to place it before the two Houses together with the ATR within six months from that date. Chidambaram said he would “refrain from commenting on the correctness or otherwise of the contents of the news story.” </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Stoutly denying the suggestion that the leakage of the report could be traced to his ministry, he said there was only one copy of the report in the Home ministry which was in “safe custody.” “No one from the Ministry of Home Affairs has spoken to any journalist about the report,” he reiterated. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Both Houses underwent two adjournments — the first around 11.30 am and the second after noon — to finally adjourn for the day after 2 pm. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >In the Lok Sabha, Leader of Opposition L K Advani, who had given a notice for the suspension of Question Hour, sought to know who had leaked the contents of the report. He said when one of his colleagues had asked the editor of The Indian Express about the report, he had said, “I can tell you, it is authentic. There is nothing imaginary about what we have published.” </font></p><p align="justify"><font >“Had there been my indictment, my party’s indictment, one could understand, but looking at the mention of Vajpayee, I felt it is my duty (to speak up for him),” Advani said.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >He said after the publication of this report, the government did not have the right to delay its tabling even for a day. Advani said the government should table the report also because The Indian Express report carried a footnote that it would be continued. He said this also amounted to a breach of privilege, but that was a different issue. “I have not taken recourse to a privilege motion,” he said. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >SP leader Mulayam Singh Yadav, CPI(M) leader Basudeb Acharia, BSP leader Dhara Singh Chauhan and BJD leader Arjun Charan Sethi also asked the government to table the report. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Meanwhile, in the Rajya Sabha, Leader of Opposition Arun Jaitley raised the issue as soon as the House met. Jaitley said the leakage of the report had lowered the dignity of Parliament, and that the source of leakage is indicated in the report itself as it refers to sources in the Union Home Ministry. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >After Chidambaram’s denial, Jaitley said if that was the case then the “breach of the privilege of this House has taken place at the behest of the Commission” since the only other copy is with the latter. He sought an inquiry into the matter. </font></p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 428, 'title' => 'Babri demolition report to be tabled in Parliament today', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The UPA government has given in to the Opposition’s demand to immediately table the Liberhan Commission report in Parliament. To this end, a meeting of the Union Cabinet was convened on Tuesday morning to approve the Action Taken Report (ATR) that will be tabled along with the Liberhan Commission report. The decision was taken after consultations with Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, who is in Washington. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The government was initially reluctant to accept the Opposition's demand given the fact that the Commission’s report was yet to be translated into Hindi and there was only one copy of the report available. It, however, decided to go ahead given the apprehension that the Opposition would continue to stall proceedings of the House on the issue. The Opposition’s demand came after The Indian Express’s story on the findings of the Liberhan Commission on Monday. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Meanwhile, amid controversy over “leakage” of the Liberhan Commission report, the Congress on Monday attacked the Opposition party saying that “the guilt and culpability” for the demolition of Babri Masjid lay with “the BJP and its affiliates”. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">“Events leading to December 6, 1992, played out in full public view and culminated in the conviction of Kalyan Singh for misleading the court. Perceptionally, the issue in the minds of the people is already settled as to who is responsible and who is guilty. Perceptionally, the issue is already settled as far as guilt and culpability is concerned. It lies primarily with the BJP and its affiliates,” Congress spokesman Manish Tewari told reporters. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Earlier in the day, Home Minister P Chidambaram said in both Houses that the report would be tabled during the current session and pointed out that since Justice M S Liberhan had submitted the report on June 30, the Government was required to place it before the two Houses together with the ATR within six months from that date. Chidambaram said he would “refrain from commenting on the correctness or otherwise of the contents of the news story.” </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Stoutly denying the suggestion that the leakage of the report could be traced to his ministry, he said there was only one copy of the report in the Home ministry which was in “safe custody.” “No one from the Ministry of Home Affairs has spoken to any journalist about the report,” he reiterated. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Both Houses underwent two adjournments — the first around 11.30 am and the second after noon — to finally adjourn for the day after 2 pm. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In the Lok Sabha, Leader of Opposition L K Advani, who had given a notice for the suspension of Question Hour, sought to know who had leaked the contents of the report. He said when one of his colleagues had asked the editor of The Indian Express about the report, he had said, “I can tell you, it is authentic. There is nothing imaginary about what we have published.” </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">“Had there been my indictment, my party’s indictment, one could understand, but looking at the mention of Vajpayee, I felt it is my duty (to speak up for him),” Advani said.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">He said after the publication of this report, the government did not have the right to delay its tabling even for a day. Advani said the government should table the report also because The Indian Express report carried a footnote that it would be continued. He said this also amounted to a breach of privilege, but that was a different issue. “I have not taken recourse to a privilege motion,” he said. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">SP leader Mulayam Singh Yadav, CPI(M) leader Basudeb Acharia, BSP leader Dhara Singh Chauhan and BJD leader Arjun Charan Sethi also asked the government to table the report. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Meanwhile, in the Rajya Sabha, Leader of Opposition Arun Jaitley raised the issue as soon as the House met. Jaitley said the leakage of the report had lowered the dignity of Parliament, and that the source of leakage is indicated in the report itself as it refers to sources in the Union Home Ministry. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">After Chidambaram’s denial, Jaitley said if that was the case then the “breach of the privilege of this House has taken place at the behest of the Commission” since the only other copy is with the latter. He sought an inquiry into the matter. </font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 24 November, 2009, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/babri-demolition-report-to-be-tabled-in-parl-today/545508/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'babri-demolition-report-to-be-tabled-in-parliament-today-497', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 497, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [[maximum depth reached]], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 428, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Babri demolition report to be tabled in Parliament today', 'metaKeywords' => null, 'metaDesc' => ' The UPA government has given in to the Opposition’s demand to immediately table the Liberhan Commission report in Parliament. To this end, a meeting of the Union Cabinet was convened on Tuesday morning to approve the Action Taken Report (ATR)...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The UPA government has given in to the Opposition’s demand to immediately table the Liberhan Commission report in Parliament. To this end, a meeting of the Union Cabinet was convened on Tuesday morning to approve the Action Taken Report (ATR) that will be tabled along with the Liberhan Commission report. The decision was taken after consultations with Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, who is in Washington. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The government was initially reluctant to accept the Opposition's demand given the fact that the Commission’s report was yet to be translated into Hindi and there was only one copy of the report available. It, however, decided to go ahead given the apprehension that the Opposition would continue to stall proceedings of the House on the issue. The Opposition’s demand came after The Indian Express’s story on the findings of the Liberhan Commission on Monday. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Meanwhile, amid controversy over “leakage” of the Liberhan Commission report, the Congress on Monday attacked the Opposition party saying that “the guilt and culpability” for the demolition of Babri Masjid lay with “the BJP and its affiliates”. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >“Events leading to December 6, 1992, played out in full public view and culminated in the conviction of Kalyan Singh for misleading the court. Perceptionally, the issue in the minds of the people is already settled as to who is responsible and who is guilty. Perceptionally, the issue is already settled as far as guilt and culpability is concerned. It lies primarily with the BJP and its affiliates,” Congress spokesman Manish Tewari told reporters. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Earlier in the day, Home Minister P Chidambaram said in both Houses that the report would be tabled during the current session and pointed out that since Justice M S Liberhan had submitted the report on June 30, the Government was required to place it before the two Houses together with the ATR within six months from that date. Chidambaram said he would “refrain from commenting on the correctness or otherwise of the contents of the news story.” </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Stoutly denying the suggestion that the leakage of the report could be traced to his ministry, he said there was only one copy of the report in the Home ministry which was in “safe custody.” “No one from the Ministry of Home Affairs has spoken to any journalist about the report,” he reiterated. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Both Houses underwent two adjournments — the first around 11.30 am and the second after noon — to finally adjourn for the day after 2 pm. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >In the Lok Sabha, Leader of Opposition L K Advani, who had given a notice for the suspension of Question Hour, sought to know who had leaked the contents of the report. He said when one of his colleagues had asked the editor of The Indian Express about the report, he had said, “I can tell you, it is authentic. There is nothing imaginary about what we have published.” </font></p><p align="justify"><font >“Had there been my indictment, my party’s indictment, one could understand, but looking at the mention of Vajpayee, I felt it is my duty (to speak up for him),” Advani said.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >He said after the publication of this report, the government did not have the right to delay its tabling even for a day. Advani said the government should table the report also because The Indian Express report carried a footnote that it would be continued. He said this also amounted to a breach of privilege, but that was a different issue. “I have not taken recourse to a privilege motion,” he said. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >SP leader Mulayam Singh Yadav, CPI(M) leader Basudeb Acharia, BSP leader Dhara Singh Chauhan and BJD leader Arjun Charan Sethi also asked the government to table the report. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Meanwhile, in the Rajya Sabha, Leader of Opposition Arun Jaitley raised the issue as soon as the House met. Jaitley said the leakage of the report had lowered the dignity of Parliament, and that the source of leakage is indicated in the report itself as it refers to sources in the Union Home Ministry. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >After Chidambaram’s denial, Jaitley said if that was the case then the “breach of the privilege of this House has taken place at the behest of the Commission” since the only other copy is with the latter. He sought an inquiry into the matter. </font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 428, 'title' => 'Babri demolition report to be tabled in Parliament today', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The UPA government has given in to the Opposition’s demand to immediately table the Liberhan Commission report in Parliament. To this end, a meeting of the Union Cabinet was convened on Tuesday morning to approve the Action Taken Report (ATR) that will be tabled along with the Liberhan Commission report. The decision was taken after consultations with Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, who is in Washington. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The government was initially reluctant to accept the Opposition's demand given the fact that the Commission’s report was yet to be translated into Hindi and there was only one copy of the report available. It, however, decided to go ahead given the apprehension that the Opposition would continue to stall proceedings of the House on the issue. The Opposition’s demand came after The Indian Express’s story on the findings of the Liberhan Commission on Monday. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Meanwhile, amid controversy over “leakage” of the Liberhan Commission report, the Congress on Monday attacked the Opposition party saying that “the guilt and culpability” for the demolition of Babri Masjid lay with “the BJP and its affiliates”. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">“Events leading to December 6, 1992, played out in full public view and culminated in the conviction of Kalyan Singh for misleading the court. Perceptionally, the issue in the minds of the people is already settled as to who is responsible and who is guilty. Perceptionally, the issue is already settled as far as guilt and culpability is concerned. It lies primarily with the BJP and its affiliates,” Congress spokesman Manish Tewari told reporters. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Earlier in the day, Home Minister P Chidambaram said in both Houses that the report would be tabled during the current session and pointed out that since Justice M S Liberhan had submitted the report on June 30, the Government was required to place it before the two Houses together with the ATR within six months from that date. Chidambaram said he would “refrain from commenting on the correctness or otherwise of the contents of the news story.” </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Stoutly denying the suggestion that the leakage of the report could be traced to his ministry, he said there was only one copy of the report in the Home ministry which was in “safe custody.” “No one from the Ministry of Home Affairs has spoken to any journalist about the report,” he reiterated. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Both Houses underwent two adjournments — the first around 11.30 am and the second after noon — to finally adjourn for the day after 2 pm. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In the Lok Sabha, Leader of Opposition L K Advani, who had given a notice for the suspension of Question Hour, sought to know who had leaked the contents of the report. He said when one of his colleagues had asked the editor of The Indian Express about the report, he had said, “I can tell you, it is authentic. There is nothing imaginary about what we have published.” </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">“Had there been my indictment, my party’s indictment, one could understand, but looking at the mention of Vajpayee, I felt it is my duty (to speak up for him),” Advani said.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">He said after the publication of this report, the government did not have the right to delay its tabling even for a day. Advani said the government should table the report also because The Indian Express report carried a footnote that it would be continued. He said this also amounted to a breach of privilege, but that was a different issue. “I have not taken recourse to a privilege motion,” he said. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">SP leader Mulayam Singh Yadav, CPI(M) leader Basudeb Acharia, BSP leader Dhara Singh Chauhan and BJD leader Arjun Charan Sethi also asked the government to table the report. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Meanwhile, in the Rajya Sabha, Leader of Opposition Arun Jaitley raised the issue as soon as the House met. Jaitley said the leakage of the report had lowered the dignity of Parliament, and that the source of leakage is indicated in the report itself as it refers to sources in the Union Home Ministry. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">After Chidambaram’s denial, Jaitley said if that was the case then the “breach of the privilege of this House has taken place at the behest of the Commission” since the only other copy is with the latter. He sought an inquiry into the matter. </font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 24 November, 2009, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/babri-demolition-report-to-be-tabled-in-parl-today/545508/', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'babri-demolition-report-to-be-tabled-in-parliament-today-497', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 497, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 428 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Babri demolition report to be tabled in Parliament today' $metaKeywords = null $metaDesc = ' The UPA government has given in to the Opposition’s demand to immediately table the Liberhan Commission report in Parliament. To this end, a meeting of the Union Cabinet was convened on Tuesday morning to approve the Action Taken Report (ATR)...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><font >The UPA government has given in to the Opposition’s demand to immediately table the Liberhan Commission report in Parliament. To this end, a meeting of the Union Cabinet was convened on Tuesday morning to approve the Action Taken Report (ATR) that will be tabled along with the Liberhan Commission report. The decision was taken after consultations with Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, who is in Washington. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The government was initially reluctant to accept the Opposition's demand given the fact that the Commission’s report was yet to be translated into Hindi and there was only one copy of the report available. It, however, decided to go ahead given the apprehension that the Opposition would continue to stall proceedings of the House on the issue. The Opposition’s demand came after The Indian Express’s story on the findings of the Liberhan Commission on Monday. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Meanwhile, amid controversy over “leakage” of the Liberhan Commission report, the Congress on Monday attacked the Opposition party saying that “the guilt and culpability” for the demolition of Babri Masjid lay with “the BJP and its affiliates”. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >“Events leading to December 6, 1992, played out in full public view and culminated in the conviction of Kalyan Singh for misleading the court. Perceptionally, the issue in the minds of the people is already settled as to who is responsible and who is guilty. Perceptionally, the issue is already settled as far as guilt and culpability is concerned. It lies primarily with the BJP and its affiliates,” Congress spokesman Manish Tewari told reporters. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Earlier in the day, Home Minister P Chidambaram said in both Houses that the report would be tabled during the current session and pointed out that since Justice M S Liberhan had submitted the report on June 30, the Government was required to place it before the two Houses together with the ATR within six months from that date. Chidambaram said he would “refrain from commenting on the correctness or otherwise of the contents of the news story.” </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Stoutly denying the suggestion that the leakage of the report could be traced to his ministry, he said there was only one copy of the report in the Home ministry which was in “safe custody.” “No one from the Ministry of Home Affairs has spoken to any journalist about the report,” he reiterated. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Both Houses underwent two adjournments — the first around 11.30 am and the second after noon — to finally adjourn for the day after 2 pm. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >In the Lok Sabha, Leader of Opposition L K Advani, who had given a notice for the suspension of Question Hour, sought to know who had leaked the contents of the report. He said when one of his colleagues had asked the editor of The Indian Express about the report, he had said, “I can tell you, it is authentic. There is nothing imaginary about what we have published.” </font></p><p align="justify"><font >“Had there been my indictment, my party’s indictment, one could understand, but looking at the mention of Vajpayee, I felt it is my duty (to speak up for him),” Advani said.</font></p><p align="justify"><font >He said after the publication of this report, the government did not have the right to delay its tabling even for a day. Advani said the government should table the report also because The Indian Express report carried a footnote that it would be continued. He said this also amounted to a breach of privilege, but that was a different issue. “I have not taken recourse to a privilege motion,” he said. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >SP leader Mulayam Singh Yadav, CPI(M) leader Basudeb Acharia, BSP leader Dhara Singh Chauhan and BJD leader Arjun Charan Sethi also asked the government to table the report. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >Meanwhile, in the Rajya Sabha, Leader of Opposition Arun Jaitley raised the issue as soon as the House met. Jaitley said the leakage of the report had lowered the dignity of Parliament, and that the source of leakage is indicated in the report itself as it refers to sources in the Union Home Ministry. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >After Chidambaram’s denial, Jaitley said if that was the case then the “breach of the privilege of this House has taken place at the behest of the Commission” since the only other copy is with the latter. He sought an inquiry into the matter. </font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Babri demolition report to be tabled in Parliament today |
The UPA government has given in to the Opposition’s demand to immediately table the Liberhan Commission report in Parliament. To this end, a meeting of the Union Cabinet was convened on Tuesday morning to approve the Action Taken Report (ATR) that will be tabled along with the Liberhan Commission report. The decision was taken after consultations with Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, who is in Washington. The government was initially reluctant to accept the Opposition's demand given the fact that the Commission’s report was yet to be translated into Hindi and there was only one copy of the report available. It, however, decided to go ahead given the apprehension that the Opposition would continue to stall proceedings of the House on the issue. The Opposition’s demand came after The Indian Express’s story on the findings of the Liberhan Commission on Monday. Meanwhile, amid controversy over “leakage” of the Liberhan Commission report, the Congress on Monday attacked the Opposition party saying that “the guilt and culpability” for the demolition of Babri Masjid lay with “the BJP and its affiliates”. “Events leading to December 6, 1992, played out in full public view and culminated in the conviction of Kalyan Singh for misleading the court. Perceptionally, the issue in the minds of the people is already settled as to who is responsible and who is guilty. Perceptionally, the issue is already settled as far as guilt and culpability is concerned. It lies primarily with the BJP and its affiliates,” Congress spokesman Manish Tewari told reporters. Earlier in the day, Home Minister P Chidambaram said in both Houses that the report would be tabled during the current session and pointed out that since Justice M S Liberhan had submitted the report on June 30, the Government was required to place it before the two Houses together with the ATR within six months from that date. Chidambaram said he would “refrain from commenting on the correctness or otherwise of the contents of the news story.” Stoutly denying the suggestion that the leakage of the report could be traced to his ministry, he said there was only one copy of the report in the Home ministry which was in “safe custody.” “No one from the Ministry of Home Affairs has spoken to any journalist about the report,” he reiterated. Both Houses underwent two adjournments — the first around 11.30 am and the second after noon — to finally adjourn for the day after 2 pm. In the Lok Sabha, Leader of Opposition L K Advani, who had given a notice for the suspension of Question Hour, sought to know who had leaked the contents of the report. He said when one of his colleagues had asked the editor of The Indian Express about the report, he had said, “I can tell you, it is authentic. There is nothing imaginary about what we have published.” “Had there been my indictment, my party’s indictment, one could understand, but looking at the mention of Vajpayee, I felt it is my duty (to speak up for him),” Advani said. He said after the publication of this report, the government did not have the right to delay its tabling even for a day. Advani said the government should table the report also because The Indian Express report carried a footnote that it would be continued. He said this also amounted to a breach of privilege, but that was a different issue. “I have not taken recourse to a privilege motion,” he said. SP leader Mulayam Singh Yadav, CPI(M) leader Basudeb Acharia, BSP leader Dhara Singh Chauhan and BJD leader Arjun Charan Sethi also asked the government to table the report. Meanwhile, in the Rajya Sabha, Leader of Opposition Arun Jaitley raised the issue as soon as the House met. Jaitley said the leakage of the report had lowered the dignity of Parliament, and that the source of leakage is indicated in the report itself as it refers to sources in the Union Home Ministry. After Chidambaram’s denial, Jaitley said if that was the case then the “breach of the privilege of this House has taken place at the behest of the Commission” since the only other copy is with the latter. He sought an inquiry into the matter. |