Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/battle-lines-being-drawn-over-minority-sub-quota-12224/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/battle-lines-being-drawn-over-minority-sub-quota-12224/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/battle-lines-being-drawn-over-minority-sub-quota-12224/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/battle-lines-being-drawn-over-minority-sub-quota-12224/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68015296b52ea-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68015296b52ea-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68015296b52ea-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68015296b52ea-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68015296b52ea-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68015296b52ea-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68015296b52ea-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68015296b52ea-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68015296b52ea-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 12105, 'title' => 'Battle lines being drawn over minority sub-quota', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p> -The Hindu </p> <p> &nbsp; </p> <div align="justify"> The government's decision on a sub-quota of 4.5 per cent for minorities within the overall 27 per cent reservation for the backward classes promises to be the new trigger for a heated political discourse just ahead of several Assembly elections, including the all-important poll in Uttar Pradesh just a few months away.<br /> <br /> More than a decade ago, the V.P. Singh government ushered in the &lsquo;Mandal revolution' in North India. It was marked by heat and passion, even death by immolation, before the issue was &ldquo;settled&rdquo; by the Supreme Court. Now the question of a separate sub-quota for the minorities, shown to be socially and economically backward by several studies, including the Sachar Committee report of 2006, threatens to re-open those old wounds when important polls loom on the horizon.<br /> <br /> While privately some party leaders see this government move as nothing but a poll gimmick, they also recognise the issue is very real and could well become the central talking point in the coming polls. A recent &ldquo;package&rdquo; for weavers was also seen to be part of the Congress poll strategy.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;While many Muslim and other minority backward communities exist on the &lsquo;Mandal' lists of States, they have not been able to benefit. This is a strong reason for a separate sub-quota,&rdquo; those supporting the move are arguing. &ldquo;It is time the issue is taken head-on, even if it means a re-look at the Constitution,&rdquo; they said.<br /> <br /> Equally firmly, some political parties are ranged against a separate minority quota. The Bharatiya Janata Party is leading the pack; talking of danger of a &ldquo;civil war&rdquo; in every village and further polarisation of Hindus and Muslims.<br /> <br /> A core committee meeting chaired by president Nitin Gadkari on Friday discussed the issue threadbare. Party leader Rajnath Singh later said some States which have sub-quotas within the 27 per cent OBC reservation have done this by creating a most backward class category, not on the basis of religion.<br /> <br /> He himself as U.P. Chief Minister created three categories within the OBC quota but not on the basis of religion. That was later quashed by his successor Mayawati. The BJP line is: &ldquo;We are against religion-based reservation. It is unconsti tutional.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> On the other side of the political pole is the Communist Party of India (Marxist). Its Polit Bureau on Friday described the government move as mere &ldquo;tokenism.&rdquo; It went a step further demanding a 10 per cent sub-quota for the minorities as recommended by the Ranganath Misra Commission. It demanded that the Constitution be amended to make this &ldquo;separate&rdquo; quota possible.<br /> <br /> The Samajwadi Party, the Janata Dal (United) and the Bahujan Samaj Party have welcomed the move, but after adding some ifs and buts. JD(U) president Sharad Yadav welcomed the government decision but raised the stakes by demanding a huge upward revision of the OBC quota to 52 per cent to reflect the numerical strength of the backward castes.<br /> <br /> SP general secretary Mohan Singh said: &ldquo;Amend the Constitution. We are not against the minority quota. But there are many backward castes which have not been able to get any reservation benefits as the 27 per cent quota is not being properly implemented.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> He was critical of the JD(U) for side-tracking the main issue by demanding increase of the OBC quota to 52 per cent.<br /> <br /> The BSP is not in a position to totally oppose the move as it too wants a share of the Muslim vote-pie in the coming election.<br /> <br /> The Congress view: it was simply carrying out what was promised in its 2009 election manifesto which gave it the mandate to rule. The manifesto referred to the party &ldquo;pioneering&rdquo; reservation for minorities in Kerala and Karnataka and committing it to &ldquo;adopting this policy at the national level.&rdquo; </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 24 December, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/article2743305.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'battle-lines-being-drawn-over-minority-sub-quota-12224', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 12224, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 12105, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Battle lines being drawn over minority sub-quota', 'metaKeywords' => 'Minority', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Hindu &nbsp; The government's decision on a sub-quota of 4.5 per cent for minorities within the overall 27 per cent reservation for the backward classes promises to be the new trigger for a heated political discourse just ahead of several Assembly...', 'disp' => '<p>-The Hindu</p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">The government's decision on a sub-quota of 4.5 per cent for minorities within the overall 27 per cent reservation for the backward classes promises to be the new trigger for a heated political discourse just ahead of several Assembly elections, including the all-important poll in Uttar Pradesh just a few months away.<br /><br />More than a decade ago, the V.P. Singh government ushered in the &lsquo;Mandal revolution' in North India. It was marked by heat and passion, even death by immolation, before the issue was &ldquo;settled&rdquo; by the Supreme Court. Now the question of a separate sub-quota for the minorities, shown to be socially and economically backward by several studies, including the Sachar Committee report of 2006, threatens to re-open those old wounds when important polls loom on the horizon.<br /><br />While privately some party leaders see this government move as nothing but a poll gimmick, they also recognise the issue is very real and could well become the central talking point in the coming polls. A recent &ldquo;package&rdquo; for weavers was also seen to be part of the Congress poll strategy.<br /><br />&ldquo;While many Muslim and other minority backward communities exist on the &lsquo;Mandal' lists of States, they have not been able to benefit. This is a strong reason for a separate sub-quota,&rdquo; those supporting the move are arguing. &ldquo;It is time the issue is taken head-on, even if it means a re-look at the Constitution,&rdquo; they said.<br /><br />Equally firmly, some political parties are ranged against a separate minority quota. The Bharatiya Janata Party is leading the pack; talking of danger of a &ldquo;civil war&rdquo; in every village and further polarisation of Hindus and Muslims.<br /><br />A core committee meeting chaired by president Nitin Gadkari on Friday discussed the issue threadbare. Party leader Rajnath Singh later said some States which have sub-quotas within the 27 per cent OBC reservation have done this by creating a most backward class category, not on the basis of religion.<br /><br />He himself as U.P. Chief Minister created three categories within the OBC quota but not on the basis of religion. That was later quashed by his successor Mayawati. The BJP line is: &ldquo;We are against religion-based reservation. It is unconsti tutional.&rdquo;<br /><br />On the other side of the political pole is the Communist Party of India (Marxist). Its Polit Bureau on Friday described the government move as mere &ldquo;tokenism.&rdquo; It went a step further demanding a 10 per cent sub-quota for the minorities as recommended by the Ranganath Misra Commission. It demanded that the Constitution be amended to make this &ldquo;separate&rdquo; quota possible.<br /><br />The Samajwadi Party, the Janata Dal (United) and the Bahujan Samaj Party have welcomed the move, but after adding some ifs and buts. JD(U) president Sharad Yadav welcomed the government decision but raised the stakes by demanding a huge upward revision of the OBC quota to 52 per cent to reflect the numerical strength of the backward castes.<br /><br />SP general secretary Mohan Singh said: &ldquo;Amend the Constitution. We are not against the minority quota. But there are many backward castes which have not been able to get any reservation benefits as the 27 per cent quota is not being properly implemented.&rdquo;<br /><br />He was critical of the JD(U) for side-tracking the main issue by demanding increase of the OBC quota to 52 per cent.<br /><br />The BSP is not in a position to totally oppose the move as it too wants a share of the Muslim vote-pie in the coming election.<br /><br />The Congress view: it was simply carrying out what was promised in its 2009 election manifesto which gave it the mandate to rule. The manifesto referred to the party &ldquo;pioneering&rdquo; reservation for minorities in Kerala and Karnataka and committing it to &ldquo;adopting this policy at the national level.&rdquo;</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 12105, 'title' => 'Battle lines being drawn over minority sub-quota', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p> -The Hindu </p> <p> &nbsp; </p> <div align="justify"> The government's decision on a sub-quota of 4.5 per cent for minorities within the overall 27 per cent reservation for the backward classes promises to be the new trigger for a heated political discourse just ahead of several Assembly elections, including the all-important poll in Uttar Pradesh just a few months away.<br /> <br /> More than a decade ago, the V.P. Singh government ushered in the &lsquo;Mandal revolution' in North India. It was marked by heat and passion, even death by immolation, before the issue was &ldquo;settled&rdquo; by the Supreme Court. Now the question of a separate sub-quota for the minorities, shown to be socially and economically backward by several studies, including the Sachar Committee report of 2006, threatens to re-open those old wounds when important polls loom on the horizon.<br /> <br /> While privately some party leaders see this government move as nothing but a poll gimmick, they also recognise the issue is very real and could well become the central talking point in the coming polls. A recent &ldquo;package&rdquo; for weavers was also seen to be part of the Congress poll strategy.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;While many Muslim and other minority backward communities exist on the &lsquo;Mandal' lists of States, they have not been able to benefit. This is a strong reason for a separate sub-quota,&rdquo; those supporting the move are arguing. &ldquo;It is time the issue is taken head-on, even if it means a re-look at the Constitution,&rdquo; they said.<br /> <br /> Equally firmly, some political parties are ranged against a separate minority quota. The Bharatiya Janata Party is leading the pack; talking of danger of a &ldquo;civil war&rdquo; in every village and further polarisation of Hindus and Muslims.<br /> <br /> A core committee meeting chaired by president Nitin Gadkari on Friday discussed the issue threadbare. Party leader Rajnath Singh later said some States which have sub-quotas within the 27 per cent OBC reservation have done this by creating a most backward class category, not on the basis of religion.<br /> <br /> He himself as U.P. Chief Minister created three categories within the OBC quota but not on the basis of religion. That was later quashed by his successor Mayawati. The BJP line is: &ldquo;We are against religion-based reservation. It is unconsti tutional.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> On the other side of the political pole is the Communist Party of India (Marxist). Its Polit Bureau on Friday described the government move as mere &ldquo;tokenism.&rdquo; It went a step further demanding a 10 per cent sub-quota for the minorities as recommended by the Ranganath Misra Commission. It demanded that the Constitution be amended to make this &ldquo;separate&rdquo; quota possible.<br /> <br /> The Samajwadi Party, the Janata Dal (United) and the Bahujan Samaj Party have welcomed the move, but after adding some ifs and buts. JD(U) president Sharad Yadav welcomed the government decision but raised the stakes by demanding a huge upward revision of the OBC quota to 52 per cent to reflect the numerical strength of the backward castes.<br /> <br /> SP general secretary Mohan Singh said: &ldquo;Amend the Constitution. We are not against the minority quota. But there are many backward castes which have not been able to get any reservation benefits as the 27 per cent quota is not being properly implemented.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> He was critical of the JD(U) for side-tracking the main issue by demanding increase of the OBC quota to 52 per cent.<br /> <br /> The BSP is not in a position to totally oppose the move as it too wants a share of the Muslim vote-pie in the coming election.<br /> <br /> The Congress view: it was simply carrying out what was promised in its 2009 election manifesto which gave it the mandate to rule. The manifesto referred to the party &ldquo;pioneering&rdquo; reservation for minorities in Kerala and Karnataka and committing it to &ldquo;adopting this policy at the national level.&rdquo; </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 24 December, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/article2743305.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'battle-lines-being-drawn-over-minority-sub-quota-12224', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 12224, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 12105 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Battle lines being drawn over minority sub-quota' $metaKeywords = 'Minority' $metaDesc = ' -The Hindu &nbsp; The government's decision on a sub-quota of 4.5 per cent for minorities within the overall 27 per cent reservation for the backward classes promises to be the new trigger for a heated political discourse just ahead of several Assembly...' $disp = '<p>-The Hindu</p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">The government's decision on a sub-quota of 4.5 per cent for minorities within the overall 27 per cent reservation for the backward classes promises to be the new trigger for a heated political discourse just ahead of several Assembly elections, including the all-important poll in Uttar Pradesh just a few months away.<br /><br />More than a decade ago, the V.P. Singh government ushered in the &lsquo;Mandal revolution' in North India. It was marked by heat and passion, even death by immolation, before the issue was &ldquo;settled&rdquo; by the Supreme Court. Now the question of a separate sub-quota for the minorities, shown to be socially and economically backward by several studies, including the Sachar Committee report of 2006, threatens to re-open those old wounds when important polls loom on the horizon.<br /><br />While privately some party leaders see this government move as nothing but a poll gimmick, they also recognise the issue is very real and could well become the central talking point in the coming polls. A recent &ldquo;package&rdquo; for weavers was also seen to be part of the Congress poll strategy.<br /><br />&ldquo;While many Muslim and other minority backward communities exist on the &lsquo;Mandal' lists of States, they have not been able to benefit. This is a strong reason for a separate sub-quota,&rdquo; those supporting the move are arguing. &ldquo;It is time the issue is taken head-on, even if it means a re-look at the Constitution,&rdquo; they said.<br /><br />Equally firmly, some political parties are ranged against a separate minority quota. The Bharatiya Janata Party is leading the pack; talking of danger of a &ldquo;civil war&rdquo; in every village and further polarisation of Hindus and Muslims.<br /><br />A core committee meeting chaired by president Nitin Gadkari on Friday discussed the issue threadbare. Party leader Rajnath Singh later said some States which have sub-quotas within the 27 per cent OBC reservation have done this by creating a most backward class category, not on the basis of religion.<br /><br />He himself as U.P. Chief Minister created three categories within the OBC quota but not on the basis of religion. That was later quashed by his successor Mayawati. The BJP line is: &ldquo;We are against religion-based reservation. It is unconsti tutional.&rdquo;<br /><br />On the other side of the political pole is the Communist Party of India (Marxist). Its Polit Bureau on Friday described the government move as mere &ldquo;tokenism.&rdquo; It went a step further demanding a 10 per cent sub-quota for the minorities as recommended by the Ranganath Misra Commission. It demanded that the Constitution be amended to make this &ldquo;separate&rdquo; quota possible.<br /><br />The Samajwadi Party, the Janata Dal (United) and the Bahujan Samaj Party have welcomed the move, but after adding some ifs and buts. JD(U) president Sharad Yadav welcomed the government decision but raised the stakes by demanding a huge upward revision of the OBC quota to 52 per cent to reflect the numerical strength of the backward castes.<br /><br />SP general secretary Mohan Singh said: &ldquo;Amend the Constitution. We are not against the minority quota. But there are many backward castes which have not been able to get any reservation benefits as the 27 per cent quota is not being properly implemented.&rdquo;<br /><br />He was critical of the JD(U) for side-tracking the main issue by demanding increase of the OBC quota to 52 per cent.<br /><br />The BSP is not in a position to totally oppose the move as it too wants a share of the Muslim vote-pie in the coming election.<br /><br />The Congress view: it was simply carrying out what was promised in its 2009 election manifesto which gave it the mandate to rule. The manifesto referred to the party &ldquo;pioneering&rdquo; reservation for minorities in Kerala and Karnataka and committing it to &ldquo;adopting this policy at the national level.&rdquo;</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/battle-lines-being-drawn-over-minority-sub-quota-12224.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Battle lines being drawn over minority sub-quota | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Hindu The government's decision on a sub-quota of 4.5 per cent for minorities within the overall 27 per cent reservation for the backward classes promises to be the new trigger for a heated political discourse just ahead of several Assembly..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Battle lines being drawn over minority sub-quota</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p>-The Hindu</p><p> </p><div align="justify">The government's decision on a sub-quota of 4.5 per cent for minorities within the overall 27 per cent reservation for the backward classes promises to be the new trigger for a heated political discourse just ahead of several Assembly elections, including the all-important poll in Uttar Pradesh just a few months away.<br /><br />More than a decade ago, the V.P. Singh government ushered in the ‘Mandal revolution' in North India. It was marked by heat and passion, even death by immolation, before the issue was “settled” by the Supreme Court. Now the question of a separate sub-quota for the minorities, shown to be socially and economically backward by several studies, including the Sachar Committee report of 2006, threatens to re-open those old wounds when important polls loom on the horizon.<br /><br />While privately some party leaders see this government move as nothing but a poll gimmick, they also recognise the issue is very real and could well become the central talking point in the coming polls. A recent “package” for weavers was also seen to be part of the Congress poll strategy.<br /><br />“While many Muslim and other minority backward communities exist on the ‘Mandal' lists of States, they have not been able to benefit. This is a strong reason for a separate sub-quota,” those supporting the move are arguing. “It is time the issue is taken head-on, even if it means a re-look at the Constitution,” they said.<br /><br />Equally firmly, some political parties are ranged against a separate minority quota. The Bharatiya Janata Party is leading the pack; talking of danger of a “civil war” in every village and further polarisation of Hindus and Muslims.<br /><br />A core committee meeting chaired by president Nitin Gadkari on Friday discussed the issue threadbare. Party leader Rajnath Singh later said some States which have sub-quotas within the 27 per cent OBC reservation have done this by creating a most backward class category, not on the basis of religion.<br /><br />He himself as U.P. Chief Minister created three categories within the OBC quota but not on the basis of religion. That was later quashed by his successor Mayawati. The BJP line is: “We are against religion-based reservation. It is unconsti tutional.”<br /><br />On the other side of the political pole is the Communist Party of India (Marxist). Its Polit Bureau on Friday described the government move as mere “tokenism.” It went a step further demanding a 10 per cent sub-quota for the minorities as recommended by the Ranganath Misra Commission. It demanded that the Constitution be amended to make this “separate” quota possible.<br /><br />The Samajwadi Party, the Janata Dal (United) and the Bahujan Samaj Party have welcomed the move, but after adding some ifs and buts. JD(U) president Sharad Yadav welcomed the government decision but raised the stakes by demanding a huge upward revision of the OBC quota to 52 per cent to reflect the numerical strength of the backward castes.<br /><br />SP general secretary Mohan Singh said: “Amend the Constitution. We are not against the minority quota. But there are many backward castes which have not been able to get any reservation benefits as the 27 per cent quota is not being properly implemented.”<br /><br />He was critical of the JD(U) for side-tracking the main issue by demanding increase of the OBC quota to 52 per cent.<br /><br />The BSP is not in a position to totally oppose the move as it too wants a share of the Muslim vote-pie in the coming election.<br /><br />The Congress view: it was simply carrying out what was promised in its 2009 election manifesto which gave it the mandate to rule. The manifesto referred to the party “pioneering” reservation for minorities in Kerala and Karnataka and committing it to “adopting this policy at the national level.”</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68015296b52ea-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68015296b52ea-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68015296b52ea-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68015296b52ea-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68015296b52ea-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68015296b52ea-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68015296b52ea-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68015296b52ea-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68015296b52ea-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 12105, 'title' => 'Battle lines being drawn over minority sub-quota', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p> -The Hindu </p> <p> &nbsp; </p> <div align="justify"> The government's decision on a sub-quota of 4.5 per cent for minorities within the overall 27 per cent reservation for the backward classes promises to be the new trigger for a heated political discourse just ahead of several Assembly elections, including the all-important poll in Uttar Pradesh just a few months away.<br /> <br /> More than a decade ago, the V.P. Singh government ushered in the &lsquo;Mandal revolution' in North India. It was marked by heat and passion, even death by immolation, before the issue was &ldquo;settled&rdquo; by the Supreme Court. Now the question of a separate sub-quota for the minorities, shown to be socially and economically backward by several studies, including the Sachar Committee report of 2006, threatens to re-open those old wounds when important polls loom on the horizon.<br /> <br /> While privately some party leaders see this government move as nothing but a poll gimmick, they also recognise the issue is very real and could well become the central talking point in the coming polls. A recent &ldquo;package&rdquo; for weavers was also seen to be part of the Congress poll strategy.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;While many Muslim and other minority backward communities exist on the &lsquo;Mandal' lists of States, they have not been able to benefit. This is a strong reason for a separate sub-quota,&rdquo; those supporting the move are arguing. &ldquo;It is time the issue is taken head-on, even if it means a re-look at the Constitution,&rdquo; they said.<br /> <br /> Equally firmly, some political parties are ranged against a separate minority quota. The Bharatiya Janata Party is leading the pack; talking of danger of a &ldquo;civil war&rdquo; in every village and further polarisation of Hindus and Muslims.<br /> <br /> A core committee meeting chaired by president Nitin Gadkari on Friday discussed the issue threadbare. Party leader Rajnath Singh later said some States which have sub-quotas within the 27 per cent OBC reservation have done this by creating a most backward class category, not on the basis of religion.<br /> <br /> He himself as U.P. Chief Minister created three categories within the OBC quota but not on the basis of religion. That was later quashed by his successor Mayawati. The BJP line is: &ldquo;We are against religion-based reservation. It is unconsti tutional.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> On the other side of the political pole is the Communist Party of India (Marxist). Its Polit Bureau on Friday described the government move as mere &ldquo;tokenism.&rdquo; It went a step further demanding a 10 per cent sub-quota for the minorities as recommended by the Ranganath Misra Commission. It demanded that the Constitution be amended to make this &ldquo;separate&rdquo; quota possible.<br /> <br /> The Samajwadi Party, the Janata Dal (United) and the Bahujan Samaj Party have welcomed the move, but after adding some ifs and buts. JD(U) president Sharad Yadav welcomed the government decision but raised the stakes by demanding a huge upward revision of the OBC quota to 52 per cent to reflect the numerical strength of the backward castes.<br /> <br /> SP general secretary Mohan Singh said: &ldquo;Amend the Constitution. We are not against the minority quota. But there are many backward castes which have not been able to get any reservation benefits as the 27 per cent quota is not being properly implemented.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> He was critical of the JD(U) for side-tracking the main issue by demanding increase of the OBC quota to 52 per cent.<br /> <br /> The BSP is not in a position to totally oppose the move as it too wants a share of the Muslim vote-pie in the coming election.<br /> <br /> The Congress view: it was simply carrying out what was promised in its 2009 election manifesto which gave it the mandate to rule. The manifesto referred to the party &ldquo;pioneering&rdquo; reservation for minorities in Kerala and Karnataka and committing it to &ldquo;adopting this policy at the national level.&rdquo; </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 24 December, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/article2743305.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'battle-lines-being-drawn-over-minority-sub-quota-12224', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 12224, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 12105, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Battle lines being drawn over minority sub-quota', 'metaKeywords' => 'Minority', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Hindu &nbsp; The government's decision on a sub-quota of 4.5 per cent for minorities within the overall 27 per cent reservation for the backward classes promises to be the new trigger for a heated political discourse just ahead of several Assembly...', 'disp' => '<p>-The Hindu</p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">The government's decision on a sub-quota of 4.5 per cent for minorities within the overall 27 per cent reservation for the backward classes promises to be the new trigger for a heated political discourse just ahead of several Assembly elections, including the all-important poll in Uttar Pradesh just a few months away.<br /><br />More than a decade ago, the V.P. Singh government ushered in the &lsquo;Mandal revolution' in North India. It was marked by heat and passion, even death by immolation, before the issue was &ldquo;settled&rdquo; by the Supreme Court. Now the question of a separate sub-quota for the minorities, shown to be socially and economically backward by several studies, including the Sachar Committee report of 2006, threatens to re-open those old wounds when important polls loom on the horizon.<br /><br />While privately some party leaders see this government move as nothing but a poll gimmick, they also recognise the issue is very real and could well become the central talking point in the coming polls. A recent &ldquo;package&rdquo; for weavers was also seen to be part of the Congress poll strategy.<br /><br />&ldquo;While many Muslim and other minority backward communities exist on the &lsquo;Mandal' lists of States, they have not been able to benefit. This is a strong reason for a separate sub-quota,&rdquo; those supporting the move are arguing. &ldquo;It is time the issue is taken head-on, even if it means a re-look at the Constitution,&rdquo; they said.<br /><br />Equally firmly, some political parties are ranged against a separate minority quota. The Bharatiya Janata Party is leading the pack; talking of danger of a &ldquo;civil war&rdquo; in every village and further polarisation of Hindus and Muslims.<br /><br />A core committee meeting chaired by president Nitin Gadkari on Friday discussed the issue threadbare. Party leader Rajnath Singh later said some States which have sub-quotas within the 27 per cent OBC reservation have done this by creating a most backward class category, not on the basis of religion.<br /><br />He himself as U.P. Chief Minister created three categories within the OBC quota but not on the basis of religion. That was later quashed by his successor Mayawati. The BJP line is: &ldquo;We are against religion-based reservation. It is unconsti tutional.&rdquo;<br /><br />On the other side of the political pole is the Communist Party of India (Marxist). Its Polit Bureau on Friday described the government move as mere &ldquo;tokenism.&rdquo; It went a step further demanding a 10 per cent sub-quota for the minorities as recommended by the Ranganath Misra Commission. It demanded that the Constitution be amended to make this &ldquo;separate&rdquo; quota possible.<br /><br />The Samajwadi Party, the Janata Dal (United) and the Bahujan Samaj Party have welcomed the move, but after adding some ifs and buts. JD(U) president Sharad Yadav welcomed the government decision but raised the stakes by demanding a huge upward revision of the OBC quota to 52 per cent to reflect the numerical strength of the backward castes.<br /><br />SP general secretary Mohan Singh said: &ldquo;Amend the Constitution. We are not against the minority quota. But there are many backward castes which have not been able to get any reservation benefits as the 27 per cent quota is not being properly implemented.&rdquo;<br /><br />He was critical of the JD(U) for side-tracking the main issue by demanding increase of the OBC quota to 52 per cent.<br /><br />The BSP is not in a position to totally oppose the move as it too wants a share of the Muslim vote-pie in the coming election.<br /><br />The Congress view: it was simply carrying out what was promised in its 2009 election manifesto which gave it the mandate to rule. The manifesto referred to the party &ldquo;pioneering&rdquo; reservation for minorities in Kerala and Karnataka and committing it to &ldquo;adopting this policy at the national level.&rdquo;</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 12105, 'title' => 'Battle lines being drawn over minority sub-quota', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p> -The Hindu </p> <p> &nbsp; </p> <div align="justify"> The government's decision on a sub-quota of 4.5 per cent for minorities within the overall 27 per cent reservation for the backward classes promises to be the new trigger for a heated political discourse just ahead of several Assembly elections, including the all-important poll in Uttar Pradesh just a few months away.<br /> <br /> More than a decade ago, the V.P. Singh government ushered in the &lsquo;Mandal revolution' in North India. It was marked by heat and passion, even death by immolation, before the issue was &ldquo;settled&rdquo; by the Supreme Court. Now the question of a separate sub-quota for the minorities, shown to be socially and economically backward by several studies, including the Sachar Committee report of 2006, threatens to re-open those old wounds when important polls loom on the horizon.<br /> <br /> While privately some party leaders see this government move as nothing but a poll gimmick, they also recognise the issue is very real and could well become the central talking point in the coming polls. A recent &ldquo;package&rdquo; for weavers was also seen to be part of the Congress poll strategy.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;While many Muslim and other minority backward communities exist on the &lsquo;Mandal' lists of States, they have not been able to benefit. This is a strong reason for a separate sub-quota,&rdquo; those supporting the move are arguing. &ldquo;It is time the issue is taken head-on, even if it means a re-look at the Constitution,&rdquo; they said.<br /> <br /> Equally firmly, some political parties are ranged against a separate minority quota. The Bharatiya Janata Party is leading the pack; talking of danger of a &ldquo;civil war&rdquo; in every village and further polarisation of Hindus and Muslims.<br /> <br /> A core committee meeting chaired by president Nitin Gadkari on Friday discussed the issue threadbare. Party leader Rajnath Singh later said some States which have sub-quotas within the 27 per cent OBC reservation have done this by creating a most backward class category, not on the basis of religion.<br /> <br /> He himself as U.P. Chief Minister created three categories within the OBC quota but not on the basis of religion. That was later quashed by his successor Mayawati. The BJP line is: &ldquo;We are against religion-based reservation. It is unconsti tutional.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> On the other side of the political pole is the Communist Party of India (Marxist). Its Polit Bureau on Friday described the government move as mere &ldquo;tokenism.&rdquo; It went a step further demanding a 10 per cent sub-quota for the minorities as recommended by the Ranganath Misra Commission. It demanded that the Constitution be amended to make this &ldquo;separate&rdquo; quota possible.<br /> <br /> The Samajwadi Party, the Janata Dal (United) and the Bahujan Samaj Party have welcomed the move, but after adding some ifs and buts. JD(U) president Sharad Yadav welcomed the government decision but raised the stakes by demanding a huge upward revision of the OBC quota to 52 per cent to reflect the numerical strength of the backward castes.<br /> <br /> SP general secretary Mohan Singh said: &ldquo;Amend the Constitution. We are not against the minority quota. But there are many backward castes which have not been able to get any reservation benefits as the 27 per cent quota is not being properly implemented.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> He was critical of the JD(U) for side-tracking the main issue by demanding increase of the OBC quota to 52 per cent.<br /> <br /> The BSP is not in a position to totally oppose the move as it too wants a share of the Muslim vote-pie in the coming election.<br /> <br /> The Congress view: it was simply carrying out what was promised in its 2009 election manifesto which gave it the mandate to rule. The manifesto referred to the party &ldquo;pioneering&rdquo; reservation for minorities in Kerala and Karnataka and committing it to &ldquo;adopting this policy at the national level.&rdquo; </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 24 December, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/article2743305.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'battle-lines-being-drawn-over-minority-sub-quota-12224', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 12224, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 12105 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Battle lines being drawn over minority sub-quota' $metaKeywords = 'Minority' $metaDesc = ' -The Hindu &nbsp; The government's decision on a sub-quota of 4.5 per cent for minorities within the overall 27 per cent reservation for the backward classes promises to be the new trigger for a heated political discourse just ahead of several Assembly...' $disp = '<p>-The Hindu</p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">The government's decision on a sub-quota of 4.5 per cent for minorities within the overall 27 per cent reservation for the backward classes promises to be the new trigger for a heated political discourse just ahead of several Assembly elections, including the all-important poll in Uttar Pradesh just a few months away.<br /><br />More than a decade ago, the V.P. Singh government ushered in the &lsquo;Mandal revolution' in North India. It was marked by heat and passion, even death by immolation, before the issue was &ldquo;settled&rdquo; by the Supreme Court. Now the question of a separate sub-quota for the minorities, shown to be socially and economically backward by several studies, including the Sachar Committee report of 2006, threatens to re-open those old wounds when important polls loom on the horizon.<br /><br />While privately some party leaders see this government move as nothing but a poll gimmick, they also recognise the issue is very real and could well become the central talking point in the coming polls. A recent &ldquo;package&rdquo; for weavers was also seen to be part of the Congress poll strategy.<br /><br />&ldquo;While many Muslim and other minority backward communities exist on the &lsquo;Mandal' lists of States, they have not been able to benefit. This is a strong reason for a separate sub-quota,&rdquo; those supporting the move are arguing. &ldquo;It is time the issue is taken head-on, even if it means a re-look at the Constitution,&rdquo; they said.<br /><br />Equally firmly, some political parties are ranged against a separate minority quota. The Bharatiya Janata Party is leading the pack; talking of danger of a &ldquo;civil war&rdquo; in every village and further polarisation of Hindus and Muslims.<br /><br />A core committee meeting chaired by president Nitin Gadkari on Friday discussed the issue threadbare. Party leader Rajnath Singh later said some States which have sub-quotas within the 27 per cent OBC reservation have done this by creating a most backward class category, not on the basis of religion.<br /><br />He himself as U.P. Chief Minister created three categories within the OBC quota but not on the basis of religion. That was later quashed by his successor Mayawati. The BJP line is: &ldquo;We are against religion-based reservation. It is unconsti tutional.&rdquo;<br /><br />On the other side of the political pole is the Communist Party of India (Marxist). Its Polit Bureau on Friday described the government move as mere &ldquo;tokenism.&rdquo; It went a step further demanding a 10 per cent sub-quota for the minorities as recommended by the Ranganath Misra Commission. It demanded that the Constitution be amended to make this &ldquo;separate&rdquo; quota possible.<br /><br />The Samajwadi Party, the Janata Dal (United) and the Bahujan Samaj Party have welcomed the move, but after adding some ifs and buts. JD(U) president Sharad Yadav welcomed the government decision but raised the stakes by demanding a huge upward revision of the OBC quota to 52 per cent to reflect the numerical strength of the backward castes.<br /><br />SP general secretary Mohan Singh said: &ldquo;Amend the Constitution. We are not against the minority quota. But there are many backward castes which have not been able to get any reservation benefits as the 27 per cent quota is not being properly implemented.&rdquo;<br /><br />He was critical of the JD(U) for side-tracking the main issue by demanding increase of the OBC quota to 52 per cent.<br /><br />The BSP is not in a position to totally oppose the move as it too wants a share of the Muslim vote-pie in the coming election.<br /><br />The Congress view: it was simply carrying out what was promised in its 2009 election manifesto which gave it the mandate to rule. The manifesto referred to the party &ldquo;pioneering&rdquo; reservation for minorities in Kerala and Karnataka and committing it to &ldquo;adopting this policy at the national level.&rdquo;</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/battle-lines-being-drawn-over-minority-sub-quota-12224.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Battle lines being drawn over minority sub-quota | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Hindu The government's decision on a sub-quota of 4.5 per cent for minorities within the overall 27 per cent reservation for the backward classes promises to be the new trigger for a heated political discourse just ahead of several Assembly..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Battle lines being drawn over minority sub-quota</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p>-The Hindu</p><p> </p><div align="justify">The government's decision on a sub-quota of 4.5 per cent for minorities within the overall 27 per cent reservation for the backward classes promises to be the new trigger for a heated political discourse just ahead of several Assembly elections, including the all-important poll in Uttar Pradesh just a few months away.<br /><br />More than a decade ago, the V.P. Singh government ushered in the ‘Mandal revolution' in North India. It was marked by heat and passion, even death by immolation, before the issue was “settled” by the Supreme Court. Now the question of a separate sub-quota for the minorities, shown to be socially and economically backward by several studies, including the Sachar Committee report of 2006, threatens to re-open those old wounds when important polls loom on the horizon.<br /><br />While privately some party leaders see this government move as nothing but a poll gimmick, they also recognise the issue is very real and could well become the central talking point in the coming polls. A recent “package” for weavers was also seen to be part of the Congress poll strategy.<br /><br />“While many Muslim and other minority backward communities exist on the ‘Mandal' lists of States, they have not been able to benefit. This is a strong reason for a separate sub-quota,” those supporting the move are arguing. “It is time the issue is taken head-on, even if it means a re-look at the Constitution,” they said.<br /><br />Equally firmly, some political parties are ranged against a separate minority quota. The Bharatiya Janata Party is leading the pack; talking of danger of a “civil war” in every village and further polarisation of Hindus and Muslims.<br /><br />A core committee meeting chaired by president Nitin Gadkari on Friday discussed the issue threadbare. Party leader Rajnath Singh later said some States which have sub-quotas within the 27 per cent OBC reservation have done this by creating a most backward class category, not on the basis of religion.<br /><br />He himself as U.P. Chief Minister created three categories within the OBC quota but not on the basis of religion. That was later quashed by his successor Mayawati. The BJP line is: “We are against religion-based reservation. It is unconsti tutional.”<br /><br />On the other side of the political pole is the Communist Party of India (Marxist). Its Polit Bureau on Friday described the government move as mere “tokenism.” It went a step further demanding a 10 per cent sub-quota for the minorities as recommended by the Ranganath Misra Commission. It demanded that the Constitution be amended to make this “separate” quota possible.<br /><br />The Samajwadi Party, the Janata Dal (United) and the Bahujan Samaj Party have welcomed the move, but after adding some ifs and buts. JD(U) president Sharad Yadav welcomed the government decision but raised the stakes by demanding a huge upward revision of the OBC quota to 52 per cent to reflect the numerical strength of the backward castes.<br /><br />SP general secretary Mohan Singh said: “Amend the Constitution. We are not against the minority quota. But there are many backward castes which have not been able to get any reservation benefits as the 27 per cent quota is not being properly implemented.”<br /><br />He was critical of the JD(U) for side-tracking the main issue by demanding increase of the OBC quota to 52 per cent.<br /><br />The BSP is not in a position to totally oppose the move as it too wants a share of the Muslim vote-pie in the coming election.<br /><br />The Congress view: it was simply carrying out what was promised in its 2009 election manifesto which gave it the mandate to rule. The manifesto referred to the party “pioneering” reservation for minorities in Kerala and Karnataka and committing it to “adopting this policy at the national level.”</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68015296b52ea-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68015296b52ea-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68015296b52ea-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68015296b52ea-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68015296b52ea-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68015296b52ea-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68015296b52ea-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68015296b52ea-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68015296b52ea-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 12105, 'title' => 'Battle lines being drawn over minority sub-quota', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p> -The Hindu </p> <p> &nbsp; </p> <div align="justify"> The government's decision on a sub-quota of 4.5 per cent for minorities within the overall 27 per cent reservation for the backward classes promises to be the new trigger for a heated political discourse just ahead of several Assembly elections, including the all-important poll in Uttar Pradesh just a few months away.<br /> <br /> More than a decade ago, the V.P. Singh government ushered in the &lsquo;Mandal revolution' in North India. It was marked by heat and passion, even death by immolation, before the issue was &ldquo;settled&rdquo; by the Supreme Court. Now the question of a separate sub-quota for the minorities, shown to be socially and economically backward by several studies, including the Sachar Committee report of 2006, threatens to re-open those old wounds when important polls loom on the horizon.<br /> <br /> While privately some party leaders see this government move as nothing but a poll gimmick, they also recognise the issue is very real and could well become the central talking point in the coming polls. A recent &ldquo;package&rdquo; for weavers was also seen to be part of the Congress poll strategy.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;While many Muslim and other minority backward communities exist on the &lsquo;Mandal' lists of States, they have not been able to benefit. This is a strong reason for a separate sub-quota,&rdquo; those supporting the move are arguing. &ldquo;It is time the issue is taken head-on, even if it means a re-look at the Constitution,&rdquo; they said.<br /> <br /> Equally firmly, some political parties are ranged against a separate minority quota. The Bharatiya Janata Party is leading the pack; talking of danger of a &ldquo;civil war&rdquo; in every village and further polarisation of Hindus and Muslims.<br /> <br /> A core committee meeting chaired by president Nitin Gadkari on Friday discussed the issue threadbare. Party leader Rajnath Singh later said some States which have sub-quotas within the 27 per cent OBC reservation have done this by creating a most backward class category, not on the basis of religion.<br /> <br /> He himself as U.P. Chief Minister created three categories within the OBC quota but not on the basis of religion. That was later quashed by his successor Mayawati. The BJP line is: &ldquo;We are against religion-based reservation. It is unconsti tutional.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> On the other side of the political pole is the Communist Party of India (Marxist). Its Polit Bureau on Friday described the government move as mere &ldquo;tokenism.&rdquo; It went a step further demanding a 10 per cent sub-quota for the minorities as recommended by the Ranganath Misra Commission. It demanded that the Constitution be amended to make this &ldquo;separate&rdquo; quota possible.<br /> <br /> The Samajwadi Party, the Janata Dal (United) and the Bahujan Samaj Party have welcomed the move, but after adding some ifs and buts. JD(U) president Sharad Yadav welcomed the government decision but raised the stakes by demanding a huge upward revision of the OBC quota to 52 per cent to reflect the numerical strength of the backward castes.<br /> <br /> SP general secretary Mohan Singh said: &ldquo;Amend the Constitution. We are not against the minority quota. But there are many backward castes which have not been able to get any reservation benefits as the 27 per cent quota is not being properly implemented.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> He was critical of the JD(U) for side-tracking the main issue by demanding increase of the OBC quota to 52 per cent.<br /> <br /> The BSP is not in a position to totally oppose the move as it too wants a share of the Muslim vote-pie in the coming election.<br /> <br /> The Congress view: it was simply carrying out what was promised in its 2009 election manifesto which gave it the mandate to rule. The manifesto referred to the party &ldquo;pioneering&rdquo; reservation for minorities in Kerala and Karnataka and committing it to &ldquo;adopting this policy at the national level.&rdquo; </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 24 December, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/article2743305.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'battle-lines-being-drawn-over-minority-sub-quota-12224', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 12224, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 12105, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Battle lines being drawn over minority sub-quota', 'metaKeywords' => 'Minority', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Hindu &nbsp; The government's decision on a sub-quota of 4.5 per cent for minorities within the overall 27 per cent reservation for the backward classes promises to be the new trigger for a heated political discourse just ahead of several Assembly...', 'disp' => '<p>-The Hindu</p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">The government's decision on a sub-quota of 4.5 per cent for minorities within the overall 27 per cent reservation for the backward classes promises to be the new trigger for a heated political discourse just ahead of several Assembly elections, including the all-important poll in Uttar Pradesh just a few months away.<br /><br />More than a decade ago, the V.P. Singh government ushered in the &lsquo;Mandal revolution' in North India. It was marked by heat and passion, even death by immolation, before the issue was &ldquo;settled&rdquo; by the Supreme Court. Now the question of a separate sub-quota for the minorities, shown to be socially and economically backward by several studies, including the Sachar Committee report of 2006, threatens to re-open those old wounds when important polls loom on the horizon.<br /><br />While privately some party leaders see this government move as nothing but a poll gimmick, they also recognise the issue is very real and could well become the central talking point in the coming polls. A recent &ldquo;package&rdquo; for weavers was also seen to be part of the Congress poll strategy.<br /><br />&ldquo;While many Muslim and other minority backward communities exist on the &lsquo;Mandal' lists of States, they have not been able to benefit. This is a strong reason for a separate sub-quota,&rdquo; those supporting the move are arguing. &ldquo;It is time the issue is taken head-on, even if it means a re-look at the Constitution,&rdquo; they said.<br /><br />Equally firmly, some political parties are ranged against a separate minority quota. The Bharatiya Janata Party is leading the pack; talking of danger of a &ldquo;civil war&rdquo; in every village and further polarisation of Hindus and Muslims.<br /><br />A core committee meeting chaired by president Nitin Gadkari on Friday discussed the issue threadbare. Party leader Rajnath Singh later said some States which have sub-quotas within the 27 per cent OBC reservation have done this by creating a most backward class category, not on the basis of religion.<br /><br />He himself as U.P. Chief Minister created three categories within the OBC quota but not on the basis of religion. That was later quashed by his successor Mayawati. The BJP line is: &ldquo;We are against religion-based reservation. It is unconsti tutional.&rdquo;<br /><br />On the other side of the political pole is the Communist Party of India (Marxist). Its Polit Bureau on Friday described the government move as mere &ldquo;tokenism.&rdquo; It went a step further demanding a 10 per cent sub-quota for the minorities as recommended by the Ranganath Misra Commission. It demanded that the Constitution be amended to make this &ldquo;separate&rdquo; quota possible.<br /><br />The Samajwadi Party, the Janata Dal (United) and the Bahujan Samaj Party have welcomed the move, but after adding some ifs and buts. JD(U) president Sharad Yadav welcomed the government decision but raised the stakes by demanding a huge upward revision of the OBC quota to 52 per cent to reflect the numerical strength of the backward castes.<br /><br />SP general secretary Mohan Singh said: &ldquo;Amend the Constitution. We are not against the minority quota. But there are many backward castes which have not been able to get any reservation benefits as the 27 per cent quota is not being properly implemented.&rdquo;<br /><br />He was critical of the JD(U) for side-tracking the main issue by demanding increase of the OBC quota to 52 per cent.<br /><br />The BSP is not in a position to totally oppose the move as it too wants a share of the Muslim vote-pie in the coming election.<br /><br />The Congress view: it was simply carrying out what was promised in its 2009 election manifesto which gave it the mandate to rule. The manifesto referred to the party &ldquo;pioneering&rdquo; reservation for minorities in Kerala and Karnataka and committing it to &ldquo;adopting this policy at the national level.&rdquo;</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 12105, 'title' => 'Battle lines being drawn over minority sub-quota', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p> -The Hindu </p> <p> &nbsp; </p> <div align="justify"> The government's decision on a sub-quota of 4.5 per cent for minorities within the overall 27 per cent reservation for the backward classes promises to be the new trigger for a heated political discourse just ahead of several Assembly elections, including the all-important poll in Uttar Pradesh just a few months away.<br /> <br /> More than a decade ago, the V.P. Singh government ushered in the &lsquo;Mandal revolution' in North India. It was marked by heat and passion, even death by immolation, before the issue was &ldquo;settled&rdquo; by the Supreme Court. Now the question of a separate sub-quota for the minorities, shown to be socially and economically backward by several studies, including the Sachar Committee report of 2006, threatens to re-open those old wounds when important polls loom on the horizon.<br /> <br /> While privately some party leaders see this government move as nothing but a poll gimmick, they also recognise the issue is very real and could well become the central talking point in the coming polls. A recent &ldquo;package&rdquo; for weavers was also seen to be part of the Congress poll strategy.<br /> <br /> &ldquo;While many Muslim and other minority backward communities exist on the &lsquo;Mandal' lists of States, they have not been able to benefit. This is a strong reason for a separate sub-quota,&rdquo; those supporting the move are arguing. &ldquo;It is time the issue is taken head-on, even if it means a re-look at the Constitution,&rdquo; they said.<br /> <br /> Equally firmly, some political parties are ranged against a separate minority quota. The Bharatiya Janata Party is leading the pack; talking of danger of a &ldquo;civil war&rdquo; in every village and further polarisation of Hindus and Muslims.<br /> <br /> A core committee meeting chaired by president Nitin Gadkari on Friday discussed the issue threadbare. Party leader Rajnath Singh later said some States which have sub-quotas within the 27 per cent OBC reservation have done this by creating a most backward class category, not on the basis of religion.<br /> <br /> He himself as U.P. Chief Minister created three categories within the OBC quota but not on the basis of religion. That was later quashed by his successor Mayawati. The BJP line is: &ldquo;We are against religion-based reservation. It is unconsti tutional.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> On the other side of the political pole is the Communist Party of India (Marxist). Its Polit Bureau on Friday described the government move as mere &ldquo;tokenism.&rdquo; It went a step further demanding a 10 per cent sub-quota for the minorities as recommended by the Ranganath Misra Commission. It demanded that the Constitution be amended to make this &ldquo;separate&rdquo; quota possible.<br /> <br /> The Samajwadi Party, the Janata Dal (United) and the Bahujan Samaj Party have welcomed the move, but after adding some ifs and buts. JD(U) president Sharad Yadav welcomed the government decision but raised the stakes by demanding a huge upward revision of the OBC quota to 52 per cent to reflect the numerical strength of the backward castes.<br /> <br /> SP general secretary Mohan Singh said: &ldquo;Amend the Constitution. We are not against the minority quota. But there are many backward castes which have not been able to get any reservation benefits as the 27 per cent quota is not being properly implemented.&rdquo;<br /> <br /> He was critical of the JD(U) for side-tracking the main issue by demanding increase of the OBC quota to 52 per cent.<br /> <br /> The BSP is not in a position to totally oppose the move as it too wants a share of the Muslim vote-pie in the coming election.<br /> <br /> The Congress view: it was simply carrying out what was promised in its 2009 election manifesto which gave it the mandate to rule. The manifesto referred to the party &ldquo;pioneering&rdquo; reservation for minorities in Kerala and Karnataka and committing it to &ldquo;adopting this policy at the national level.&rdquo; </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 24 December, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/article2743305.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'battle-lines-being-drawn-over-minority-sub-quota-12224', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 12224, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 12105 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Battle lines being drawn over minority sub-quota' $metaKeywords = 'Minority' $metaDesc = ' -The Hindu &nbsp; The government's decision on a sub-quota of 4.5 per cent for minorities within the overall 27 per cent reservation for the backward classes promises to be the new trigger for a heated political discourse just ahead of several Assembly...' $disp = '<p>-The Hindu</p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">The government's decision on a sub-quota of 4.5 per cent for minorities within the overall 27 per cent reservation for the backward classes promises to be the new trigger for a heated political discourse just ahead of several Assembly elections, including the all-important poll in Uttar Pradesh just a few months away.<br /><br />More than a decade ago, the V.P. Singh government ushered in the &lsquo;Mandal revolution' in North India. It was marked by heat and passion, even death by immolation, before the issue was &ldquo;settled&rdquo; by the Supreme Court. Now the question of a separate sub-quota for the minorities, shown to be socially and economically backward by several studies, including the Sachar Committee report of 2006, threatens to re-open those old wounds when important polls loom on the horizon.<br /><br />While privately some party leaders see this government move as nothing but a poll gimmick, they also recognise the issue is very real and could well become the central talking point in the coming polls. A recent &ldquo;package&rdquo; for weavers was also seen to be part of the Congress poll strategy.<br /><br />&ldquo;While many Muslim and other minority backward communities exist on the &lsquo;Mandal' lists of States, they have not been able to benefit. This is a strong reason for a separate sub-quota,&rdquo; those supporting the move are arguing. &ldquo;It is time the issue is taken head-on, even if it means a re-look at the Constitution,&rdquo; they said.<br /><br />Equally firmly, some political parties are ranged against a separate minority quota. The Bharatiya Janata Party is leading the pack; talking of danger of a &ldquo;civil war&rdquo; in every village and further polarisation of Hindus and Muslims.<br /><br />A core committee meeting chaired by president Nitin Gadkari on Friday discussed the issue threadbare. Party leader Rajnath Singh later said some States which have sub-quotas within the 27 per cent OBC reservation have done this by creating a most backward class category, not on the basis of religion.<br /><br />He himself as U.P. Chief Minister created three categories within the OBC quota but not on the basis of religion. That was later quashed by his successor Mayawati. The BJP line is: &ldquo;We are against religion-based reservation. It is unconsti tutional.&rdquo;<br /><br />On the other side of the political pole is the Communist Party of India (Marxist). Its Polit Bureau on Friday described the government move as mere &ldquo;tokenism.&rdquo; It went a step further demanding a 10 per cent sub-quota for the minorities as recommended by the Ranganath Misra Commission. It demanded that the Constitution be amended to make this &ldquo;separate&rdquo; quota possible.<br /><br />The Samajwadi Party, the Janata Dal (United) and the Bahujan Samaj Party have welcomed the move, but after adding some ifs and buts. JD(U) president Sharad Yadav welcomed the government decision but raised the stakes by demanding a huge upward revision of the OBC quota to 52 per cent to reflect the numerical strength of the backward castes.<br /><br />SP general secretary Mohan Singh said: &ldquo;Amend the Constitution. We are not against the minority quota. But there are many backward castes which have not been able to get any reservation benefits as the 27 per cent quota is not being properly implemented.&rdquo;<br /><br />He was critical of the JD(U) for side-tracking the main issue by demanding increase of the OBC quota to 52 per cent.<br /><br />The BSP is not in a position to totally oppose the move as it too wants a share of the Muslim vote-pie in the coming election.<br /><br />The Congress view: it was simply carrying out what was promised in its 2009 election manifesto which gave it the mandate to rule. The manifesto referred to the party &ldquo;pioneering&rdquo; reservation for minorities in Kerala and Karnataka and committing it to &ldquo;adopting this policy at the national level.&rdquo;</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/battle-lines-being-drawn-over-minority-sub-quota-12224.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Battle lines being drawn over minority sub-quota | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -The Hindu The government's decision on a sub-quota of 4.5 per cent for minorities within the overall 27 per cent reservation for the backward classes promises to be the new trigger for a heated political discourse just ahead of several Assembly..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Battle lines being drawn over minority sub-quota</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p>-The Hindu</p><p> </p><div align="justify">The government's decision on a sub-quota of 4.5 per cent for minorities within the overall 27 per cent reservation for the backward classes promises to be the new trigger for a heated political discourse just ahead of several Assembly elections, including the all-important poll in Uttar Pradesh just a few months away.<br /><br />More than a decade ago, the V.P. Singh government ushered in the ‘Mandal revolution' in North India. It was marked by heat and passion, even death by immolation, before the issue was “settled” by the Supreme Court. Now the question of a separate sub-quota for the minorities, shown to be socially and economically backward by several studies, including the Sachar Committee report of 2006, threatens to re-open those old wounds when important polls loom on the horizon.<br /><br />While privately some party leaders see this government move as nothing but a poll gimmick, they also recognise the issue is very real and could well become the central talking point in the coming polls. A recent “package” for weavers was also seen to be part of the Congress poll strategy.<br /><br />“While many Muslim and other minority backward communities exist on the ‘Mandal' lists of States, they have not been able to benefit. This is a strong reason for a separate sub-quota,” those supporting the move are arguing. “It is time the issue is taken head-on, even if it means a re-look at the Constitution,” they said.<br /><br />Equally firmly, some political parties are ranged against a separate minority quota. The Bharatiya Janata Party is leading the pack; talking of danger of a “civil war” in every village and further polarisation of Hindus and Muslims.<br /><br />A core committee meeting chaired by president Nitin Gadkari on Friday discussed the issue threadbare. Party leader Rajnath Singh later said some States which have sub-quotas within the 27 per cent OBC reservation have done this by creating a most backward class category, not on the basis of religion.<br /><br />He himself as U.P. Chief Minister created three categories within the OBC quota but not on the basis of religion. That was later quashed by his successor Mayawati. The BJP line is: “We are against religion-based reservation. It is unconsti tutional.”<br /><br />On the other side of the political pole is the Communist Party of India (Marxist). Its Polit Bureau on Friday described the government move as mere “tokenism.” It went a step further demanding a 10 per cent sub-quota for the minorities as recommended by the Ranganath Misra Commission. It demanded that the Constitution be amended to make this “separate” quota possible.<br /><br />The Samajwadi Party, the Janata Dal (United) and the Bahujan Samaj Party have welcomed the move, but after adding some ifs and buts. JD(U) president Sharad Yadav welcomed the government decision but raised the stakes by demanding a huge upward revision of the OBC quota to 52 per cent to reflect the numerical strength of the backward castes.<br /><br />SP general secretary Mohan Singh said: “Amend the Constitution. We are not against the minority quota. But there are many backward castes which have not been able to get any reservation benefits as the 27 per cent quota is not being properly implemented.”<br /><br />He was critical of the JD(U) for side-tracking the main issue by demanding increase of the OBC quota to 52 per cent.<br /><br />The BSP is not in a position to totally oppose the move as it too wants a share of the Muslim vote-pie in the coming election.<br /><br />The Congress view: it was simply carrying out what was promised in its 2009 election manifesto which gave it the mandate to rule. The manifesto referred to the party “pioneering” reservation for minorities in Kerala and Karnataka and committing it to “adopting this policy at the national level.”</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 12105, 'title' => 'Battle lines being drawn over minority sub-quota', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p> -The Hindu </p> <p> </p> <div align="justify"> The government's decision on a sub-quota of 4.5 per cent for minorities within the overall 27 per cent reservation for the backward classes promises to be the new trigger for a heated political discourse just ahead of several Assembly elections, including the all-important poll in Uttar Pradesh just a few months away.<br /> <br /> More than a decade ago, the V.P. Singh government ushered in the ‘Mandal revolution' in North India. It was marked by heat and passion, even death by immolation, before the issue was “settled” by the Supreme Court. Now the question of a separate sub-quota for the minorities, shown to be socially and economically backward by several studies, including the Sachar Committee report of 2006, threatens to re-open those old wounds when important polls loom on the horizon.<br /> <br /> While privately some party leaders see this government move as nothing but a poll gimmick, they also recognise the issue is very real and could well become the central talking point in the coming polls. A recent “package” for weavers was also seen to be part of the Congress poll strategy.<br /> <br /> “While many Muslim and other minority backward communities exist on the ‘Mandal' lists of States, they have not been able to benefit. This is a strong reason for a separate sub-quota,” those supporting the move are arguing. “It is time the issue is taken head-on, even if it means a re-look at the Constitution,” they said.<br /> <br /> Equally firmly, some political parties are ranged against a separate minority quota. The Bharatiya Janata Party is leading the pack; talking of danger of a “civil war” in every village and further polarisation of Hindus and Muslims.<br /> <br /> A core committee meeting chaired by president Nitin Gadkari on Friday discussed the issue threadbare. Party leader Rajnath Singh later said some States which have sub-quotas within the 27 per cent OBC reservation have done this by creating a most backward class category, not on the basis of religion.<br /> <br /> He himself as U.P. Chief Minister created three categories within the OBC quota but not on the basis of religion. That was later quashed by his successor Mayawati. The BJP line is: “We are against religion-based reservation. It is unconsti tutional.”<br /> <br /> On the other side of the political pole is the Communist Party of India (Marxist). Its Polit Bureau on Friday described the government move as mere “tokenism.” It went a step further demanding a 10 per cent sub-quota for the minorities as recommended by the Ranganath Misra Commission. It demanded that the Constitution be amended to make this “separate” quota possible.<br /> <br /> The Samajwadi Party, the Janata Dal (United) and the Bahujan Samaj Party have welcomed the move, but after adding some ifs and buts. JD(U) president Sharad Yadav welcomed the government decision but raised the stakes by demanding a huge upward revision of the OBC quota to 52 per cent to reflect the numerical strength of the backward castes.<br /> <br /> SP general secretary Mohan Singh said: “Amend the Constitution. We are not against the minority quota. But there are many backward castes which have not been able to get any reservation benefits as the 27 per cent quota is not being properly implemented.”<br /> <br /> He was critical of the JD(U) for side-tracking the main issue by demanding increase of the OBC quota to 52 per cent.<br /> <br /> The BSP is not in a position to totally oppose the move as it too wants a share of the Muslim vote-pie in the coming election.<br /> <br /> The Congress view: it was simply carrying out what was promised in its 2009 election manifesto which gave it the mandate to rule. The manifesto referred to the party “pioneering” reservation for minorities in Kerala and Karnataka and committing it to “adopting this policy at the national level.” </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 24 December, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/article2743305.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'battle-lines-being-drawn-over-minority-sub-quota-12224', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 12224, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 12105, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Battle lines being drawn over minority sub-quota', 'metaKeywords' => 'Minority', 'metaDesc' => ' -The Hindu The government's decision on a sub-quota of 4.5 per cent for minorities within the overall 27 per cent reservation for the backward classes promises to be the new trigger for a heated political discourse just ahead of several Assembly...', 'disp' => '<p>-The Hindu</p><p> </p><div align="justify">The government's decision on a sub-quota of 4.5 per cent for minorities within the overall 27 per cent reservation for the backward classes promises to be the new trigger for a heated political discourse just ahead of several Assembly elections, including the all-important poll in Uttar Pradesh just a few months away.<br /><br />More than a decade ago, the V.P. Singh government ushered in the ‘Mandal revolution' in North India. It was marked by heat and passion, even death by immolation, before the issue was “settled” by the Supreme Court. Now the question of a separate sub-quota for the minorities, shown to be socially and economically backward by several studies, including the Sachar Committee report of 2006, threatens to re-open those old wounds when important polls loom on the horizon.<br /><br />While privately some party leaders see this government move as nothing but a poll gimmick, they also recognise the issue is very real and could well become the central talking point in the coming polls. A recent “package” for weavers was also seen to be part of the Congress poll strategy.<br /><br />“While many Muslim and other minority backward communities exist on the ‘Mandal' lists of States, they have not been able to benefit. This is a strong reason for a separate sub-quota,” those supporting the move are arguing. “It is time the issue is taken head-on, even if it means a re-look at the Constitution,” they said.<br /><br />Equally firmly, some political parties are ranged against a separate minority quota. The Bharatiya Janata Party is leading the pack; talking of danger of a “civil war” in every village and further polarisation of Hindus and Muslims.<br /><br />A core committee meeting chaired by president Nitin Gadkari on Friday discussed the issue threadbare. Party leader Rajnath Singh later said some States which have sub-quotas within the 27 per cent OBC reservation have done this by creating a most backward class category, not on the basis of religion.<br /><br />He himself as U.P. Chief Minister created three categories within the OBC quota but not on the basis of religion. That was later quashed by his successor Mayawati. The BJP line is: “We are against religion-based reservation. It is unconsti tutional.”<br /><br />On the other side of the political pole is the Communist Party of India (Marxist). Its Polit Bureau on Friday described the government move as mere “tokenism.” It went a step further demanding a 10 per cent sub-quota for the minorities as recommended by the Ranganath Misra Commission. It demanded that the Constitution be amended to make this “separate” quota possible.<br /><br />The Samajwadi Party, the Janata Dal (United) and the Bahujan Samaj Party have welcomed the move, but after adding some ifs and buts. JD(U) president Sharad Yadav welcomed the government decision but raised the stakes by demanding a huge upward revision of the OBC quota to 52 per cent to reflect the numerical strength of the backward castes.<br /><br />SP general secretary Mohan Singh said: “Amend the Constitution. We are not against the minority quota. But there are many backward castes which have not been able to get any reservation benefits as the 27 per cent quota is not being properly implemented.”<br /><br />He was critical of the JD(U) for side-tracking the main issue by demanding increase of the OBC quota to 52 per cent.<br /><br />The BSP is not in a position to totally oppose the move as it too wants a share of the Muslim vote-pie in the coming election.<br /><br />The Congress view: it was simply carrying out what was promised in its 2009 election manifesto which gave it the mandate to rule. The manifesto referred to the party “pioneering” reservation for minorities in Kerala and Karnataka and committing it to “adopting this policy at the national level.”</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 12105, 'title' => 'Battle lines being drawn over minority sub-quota', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p> -The Hindu </p> <p> </p> <div align="justify"> The government's decision on a sub-quota of 4.5 per cent for minorities within the overall 27 per cent reservation for the backward classes promises to be the new trigger for a heated political discourse just ahead of several Assembly elections, including the all-important poll in Uttar Pradesh just a few months away.<br /> <br /> More than a decade ago, the V.P. Singh government ushered in the ‘Mandal revolution' in North India. It was marked by heat and passion, even death by immolation, before the issue was “settled” by the Supreme Court. Now the question of a separate sub-quota for the minorities, shown to be socially and economically backward by several studies, including the Sachar Committee report of 2006, threatens to re-open those old wounds when important polls loom on the horizon.<br /> <br /> While privately some party leaders see this government move as nothing but a poll gimmick, they also recognise the issue is very real and could well become the central talking point in the coming polls. A recent “package” for weavers was also seen to be part of the Congress poll strategy.<br /> <br /> “While many Muslim and other minority backward communities exist on the ‘Mandal' lists of States, they have not been able to benefit. This is a strong reason for a separate sub-quota,” those supporting the move are arguing. “It is time the issue is taken head-on, even if it means a re-look at the Constitution,” they said.<br /> <br /> Equally firmly, some political parties are ranged against a separate minority quota. The Bharatiya Janata Party is leading the pack; talking of danger of a “civil war” in every village and further polarisation of Hindus and Muslims.<br /> <br /> A core committee meeting chaired by president Nitin Gadkari on Friday discussed the issue threadbare. Party leader Rajnath Singh later said some States which have sub-quotas within the 27 per cent OBC reservation have done this by creating a most backward class category, not on the basis of religion.<br /> <br /> He himself as U.P. Chief Minister created three categories within the OBC quota but not on the basis of religion. That was later quashed by his successor Mayawati. The BJP line is: “We are against religion-based reservation. It is unconsti tutional.”<br /> <br /> On the other side of the political pole is the Communist Party of India (Marxist). Its Polit Bureau on Friday described the government move as mere “tokenism.” It went a step further demanding a 10 per cent sub-quota for the minorities as recommended by the Ranganath Misra Commission. It demanded that the Constitution be amended to make this “separate” quota possible.<br /> <br /> The Samajwadi Party, the Janata Dal (United) and the Bahujan Samaj Party have welcomed the move, but after adding some ifs and buts. JD(U) president Sharad Yadav welcomed the government decision but raised the stakes by demanding a huge upward revision of the OBC quota to 52 per cent to reflect the numerical strength of the backward castes.<br /> <br /> SP general secretary Mohan Singh said: “Amend the Constitution. We are not against the minority quota. But there are many backward castes which have not been able to get any reservation benefits as the 27 per cent quota is not being properly implemented.”<br /> <br /> He was critical of the JD(U) for side-tracking the main issue by demanding increase of the OBC quota to 52 per cent.<br /> <br /> The BSP is not in a position to totally oppose the move as it too wants a share of the Muslim vote-pie in the coming election.<br /> <br /> The Congress view: it was simply carrying out what was promised in its 2009 election manifesto which gave it the mandate to rule. The manifesto referred to the party “pioneering” reservation for minorities in Kerala and Karnataka and committing it to “adopting this policy at the national level.” </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 24 December, 2011, http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/article2743305.ece', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'battle-lines-being-drawn-over-minority-sub-quota-12224', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 12224, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 12105 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Battle lines being drawn over minority sub-quota' $metaKeywords = 'Minority' $metaDesc = ' -The Hindu The government's decision on a sub-quota of 4.5 per cent for minorities within the overall 27 per cent reservation for the backward classes promises to be the new trigger for a heated political discourse just ahead of several Assembly...' $disp = '<p>-The Hindu</p><p> </p><div align="justify">The government's decision on a sub-quota of 4.5 per cent for minorities within the overall 27 per cent reservation for the backward classes promises to be the new trigger for a heated political discourse just ahead of several Assembly elections, including the all-important poll in Uttar Pradesh just a few months away.<br /><br />More than a decade ago, the V.P. Singh government ushered in the ‘Mandal revolution' in North India. It was marked by heat and passion, even death by immolation, before the issue was “settled” by the Supreme Court. Now the question of a separate sub-quota for the minorities, shown to be socially and economically backward by several studies, including the Sachar Committee report of 2006, threatens to re-open those old wounds when important polls loom on the horizon.<br /><br />While privately some party leaders see this government move as nothing but a poll gimmick, they also recognise the issue is very real and could well become the central talking point in the coming polls. A recent “package” for weavers was also seen to be part of the Congress poll strategy.<br /><br />“While many Muslim and other minority backward communities exist on the ‘Mandal' lists of States, they have not been able to benefit. This is a strong reason for a separate sub-quota,” those supporting the move are arguing. “It is time the issue is taken head-on, even if it means a re-look at the Constitution,” they said.<br /><br />Equally firmly, some political parties are ranged against a separate minority quota. The Bharatiya Janata Party is leading the pack; talking of danger of a “civil war” in every village and further polarisation of Hindus and Muslims.<br /><br />A core committee meeting chaired by president Nitin Gadkari on Friday discussed the issue threadbare. Party leader Rajnath Singh later said some States which have sub-quotas within the 27 per cent OBC reservation have done this by creating a most backward class category, not on the basis of religion.<br /><br />He himself as U.P. Chief Minister created three categories within the OBC quota but not on the basis of religion. That was later quashed by his successor Mayawati. The BJP line is: “We are against religion-based reservation. It is unconsti tutional.”<br /><br />On the other side of the political pole is the Communist Party of India (Marxist). Its Polit Bureau on Friday described the government move as mere “tokenism.” It went a step further demanding a 10 per cent sub-quota for the minorities as recommended by the Ranganath Misra Commission. It demanded that the Constitution be amended to make this “separate” quota possible.<br /><br />The Samajwadi Party, the Janata Dal (United) and the Bahujan Samaj Party have welcomed the move, but after adding some ifs and buts. JD(U) president Sharad Yadav welcomed the government decision but raised the stakes by demanding a huge upward revision of the OBC quota to 52 per cent to reflect the numerical strength of the backward castes.<br /><br />SP general secretary Mohan Singh said: “Amend the Constitution. We are not against the minority quota. But there are many backward castes which have not been able to get any reservation benefits as the 27 per cent quota is not being properly implemented.”<br /><br />He was critical of the JD(U) for side-tracking the main issue by demanding increase of the OBC quota to 52 per cent.<br /><br />The BSP is not in a position to totally oppose the move as it too wants a share of the Muslim vote-pie in the coming election.<br /><br />The Congress view: it was simply carrying out what was promised in its 2009 election manifesto which gave it the mandate to rule. The manifesto referred to the party “pioneering” reservation for minorities in Kerala and Karnataka and committing it to “adopting this policy at the national level.”</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Battle lines being drawn over minority sub-quota |
-The Hindu
The government's decision on a sub-quota of 4.5 per cent for minorities within the overall 27 per cent reservation for the backward classes promises to be the new trigger for a heated political discourse just ahead of several Assembly elections, including the all-important poll in Uttar Pradesh just a few months away.
More than a decade ago, the V.P. Singh government ushered in the ‘Mandal revolution' in North India. It was marked by heat and passion, even death by immolation, before the issue was “settled” by the Supreme Court. Now the question of a separate sub-quota for the minorities, shown to be socially and economically backward by several studies, including the Sachar Committee report of 2006, threatens to re-open those old wounds when important polls loom on the horizon. While privately some party leaders see this government move as nothing but a poll gimmick, they also recognise the issue is very real and could well become the central talking point in the coming polls. A recent “package” for weavers was also seen to be part of the Congress poll strategy. “While many Muslim and other minority backward communities exist on the ‘Mandal' lists of States, they have not been able to benefit. This is a strong reason for a separate sub-quota,” those supporting the move are arguing. “It is time the issue is taken head-on, even if it means a re-look at the Constitution,” they said. Equally firmly, some political parties are ranged against a separate minority quota. The Bharatiya Janata Party is leading the pack; talking of danger of a “civil war” in every village and further polarisation of Hindus and Muslims. A core committee meeting chaired by president Nitin Gadkari on Friday discussed the issue threadbare. Party leader Rajnath Singh later said some States which have sub-quotas within the 27 per cent OBC reservation have done this by creating a most backward class category, not on the basis of religion. He himself as U.P. Chief Minister created three categories within the OBC quota but not on the basis of religion. That was later quashed by his successor Mayawati. The BJP line is: “We are against religion-based reservation. It is unconsti tutional.” On the other side of the political pole is the Communist Party of India (Marxist). Its Polit Bureau on Friday described the government move as mere “tokenism.” It went a step further demanding a 10 per cent sub-quota for the minorities as recommended by the Ranganath Misra Commission. It demanded that the Constitution be amended to make this “separate” quota possible. The Samajwadi Party, the Janata Dal (United) and the Bahujan Samaj Party have welcomed the move, but after adding some ifs and buts. JD(U) president Sharad Yadav welcomed the government decision but raised the stakes by demanding a huge upward revision of the OBC quota to 52 per cent to reflect the numerical strength of the backward castes. SP general secretary Mohan Singh said: “Amend the Constitution. We are not against the minority quota. But there are many backward castes which have not been able to get any reservation benefits as the 27 per cent quota is not being properly implemented.” He was critical of the JD(U) for side-tracking the main issue by demanding increase of the OBC quota to 52 per cent. The BSP is not in a position to totally oppose the move as it too wants a share of the Muslim vote-pie in the coming election. The Congress view: it was simply carrying out what was promised in its 2009 election manifesto which gave it the mandate to rule. The manifesto referred to the party “pioneering” reservation for minorities in Kerala and Karnataka and committing it to “adopting this policy at the national level.” |