Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/battle-over-cattle-himanshu-upadhyaya-4682228/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/battle-over-cattle-himanshu-upadhyaya-4682228/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/battle-over-cattle-himanshu-upadhyaya-4682228/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/battle-over-cattle-himanshu-upadhyaya-4682228/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9608cbbc45-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9608cbbc45-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f9608cbbc45-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9608cbbc45-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9608cbbc45-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9608cbbc45-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9608cbbc45-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f9608cbbc45-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f9608cbbc45-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 34126, 'title' => 'Battle over cattle -Himanshu Upadhyaya', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -GovernanceNow.com<br /> <br /> <em>Banning cattle slaughter, like demonetisation, may deliver political gains but will hit the rural economy hard<br /> </em><br /> More than a century ago, a team of officials from Brazil toured some villages of Kheda district, in central Gujarat. They had come to procure breeding bulls of the famous Kankreji breed, notes Bhailal Patel, a charismatic institution-builder who was also the first leader of opposition in Gujarat assembly, in his memoirs. It was of course a different India the Brazilians encountered. Cattle in those days were sold and procured without the paperwork to prove that the purchase was being made for purposes other than slaughter. It was a time when nutritionists had started calling milk a complete food and it was creating a niche in the food basket of people. </div> <div align="justify"> <br /> Not that there were no animal rights activists around then and prevention of cruelty against animals was an unheard-of phrase. On the contrary, there were several of them &ndash; the first Society for Prevention of Cruelty against Animals was founded in Calcutta in 1861 by Colesworthey Grant, and there exists a memorial for her in front of Writers&rsquo; Building &ndash; but they lobbied the government for ensuring the welfare of animals without the nefarious intent of interfering with people&rsquo;s dietary choices or imposing vigilante ideas on minorities that derive their livelihoods from livestock.<br /> &nbsp;<br /> If one looks carefully in the archives, even as a cow protection movement took roots in north India, livestock experts within the British establishment and commissariat were debating questions such as &lsquo;What good does a cattle show do in India?&rsquo; They considered whether to impose an embargo on the export of live animals of certain breeds of cattle or not. The Indian branch of the Humanitarian League started publishing several documents that focused on vegetarianism and cow protection. However, the drumming up of hysteria around cattle slaughter and vigilantism had not surfaced without sane voices articulating checks &ndash; be it Ram Mohan Roy writing in defence of beef-eating or MK Gandhi articulating a non-fanatic version of championing the cause of the cow in his Hind Swaraj.<br /> &nbsp;<br /> On May 23 this year, the ministry of environment issued &lsquo;Rules on prevention of cruelty to animals (regulation of livestock market)&rsquo; with the purported aim of regulating animal markets. When one reads the rules &ndash; notwithstanding the lame efforts from union ministers to issue clarifications &ndash; one is left with the feeling that these are drafted by overzealous persons with misplaced notions of what constitutes the welfare of livestock and livestock owners.<br /> &nbsp;<br /> Clause 22 has been the one that has come under close scrutiny, and not without reason. With a single stroke of the pen, it seeks to restructure all the animal markets in the country where animals are to be traded exclusively for &ldquo;agricultural purposes&rdquo; and not for slaughter. Notwithstanding finance minister Arun Jaitley&rsquo;s clarifications, please read clause 22 along with the clause 2 (b), which contains a very expansive definition of what all places are construed as &lsquo;animal market&rsquo; &ndash; it even includes &ldquo;any lairage [that is, where cattle may be rested on the way to a slaughterhouse] adjoining a market or a slaughterhouse&rdquo;!<br /> &nbsp;<br /> The overzealousness is also visible when one read clause 2 (e) that states, &ldquo;cattle means a bovine animal including bulls, bullocks, cows, buffalos, steers, heifers and calves and includes camels&rdquo; (emphasis added). The inspiration for making sure that all these animals that clause 2 (e) defines as cattle must be traded at animal market exclusively for &lsquo;agricultural purposes&rsquo; is said to have its origins in the directive principles of the Indian constitution. The deceit becomes obvious when one reads the directive principle and finds no mention of buffalo and camel there. <br /> &nbsp;<br /> So, why were camels and buffaloes added in the definition of cattle? The camel population of India is concentrated in Rajasthan and one district of Gujarat. Camels are critically endangered in parts of Jammu and Kashmir. Their numbers have been declining: there were 10 lakh head in 1992, but the number shrunk to 4 lakh in 2012. In 2014, Rajasthan declared camel the &ldquo;state animal&rdquo; and a year later promulgated the Rajasthan Camel (Prohibition of Slaughter and Regulation of Temporary Migration) Bill. However, Ilse K&ouml;hler-Rollefson, a prominent expert who has worked among Rajasthan camel breeders and herders, points out that &ldquo;this does not provide a solution to the key issues behind the crisis&rdquo;.<br /> <br /> Please <a href="http://www.governancenow.com/news/regular-story/battle-over-cattle">click here</a> to read more. <br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'GovernanceNow.com, 21 June, 2017, http://www.governancenow.com/news/regular-story/battle-over-cattle', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'battle-over-cattle-himanshu-upadhyaya-4682228', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4682228, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 34126, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Battle over cattle -Himanshu Upadhyaya', 'metaKeywords' => 'Cow Protection,Cow Slaughter,Cattle breeding,Cattle slaughter,Cattle Trade', 'metaDesc' => ' -GovernanceNow.com Banning cattle slaughter, like demonetisation, may deliver political gains but will hit the rural economy hard More than a century ago, a team of officials from Brazil toured some villages of Kheda district, in central Gujarat. They had come to procure...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-GovernanceNow.com<br /><br /><em>Banning cattle slaughter, like demonetisation, may deliver political gains but will hit the rural economy hard<br /></em><br />More than a century ago, a team of officials from Brazil toured some villages of Kheda district, in central Gujarat. They had come to procure breeding bulls of the famous Kankreji breed, notes Bhailal Patel, a charismatic institution-builder who was also the first leader of opposition in Gujarat assembly, in his memoirs. It was of course a different India the Brazilians encountered. Cattle in those days were sold and procured without the paperwork to prove that the purchase was being made for purposes other than slaughter. It was a time when nutritionists had started calling milk a complete food and it was creating a niche in the food basket of people.</div><div align="justify"><br />Not that there were no animal rights activists around then and prevention of cruelty against animals was an unheard-of phrase. On the contrary, there were several of them &ndash; the first Society for Prevention of Cruelty against Animals was founded in Calcutta in 1861 by Colesworthey Grant, and there exists a memorial for her in front of Writers&rsquo; Building &ndash; but they lobbied the government for ensuring the welfare of animals without the nefarious intent of interfering with people&rsquo;s dietary choices or imposing vigilante ideas on minorities that derive their livelihoods from livestock.<br />&nbsp;<br />If one looks carefully in the archives, even as a cow protection movement took roots in north India, livestock experts within the British establishment and commissariat were debating questions such as &lsquo;What good does a cattle show do in India?&rsquo; They considered whether to impose an embargo on the export of live animals of certain breeds of cattle or not. The Indian branch of the Humanitarian League started publishing several documents that focused on vegetarianism and cow protection. However, the drumming up of hysteria around cattle slaughter and vigilantism had not surfaced without sane voices articulating checks &ndash; be it Ram Mohan Roy writing in defence of beef-eating or MK Gandhi articulating a non-fanatic version of championing the cause of the cow in his Hind Swaraj.<br />&nbsp;<br />On May 23 this year, the ministry of environment issued &lsquo;Rules on prevention of cruelty to animals (regulation of livestock market)&rsquo; with the purported aim of regulating animal markets. When one reads the rules &ndash; notwithstanding the lame efforts from union ministers to issue clarifications &ndash; one is left with the feeling that these are drafted by overzealous persons with misplaced notions of what constitutes the welfare of livestock and livestock owners.<br />&nbsp;<br />Clause 22 has been the one that has come under close scrutiny, and not without reason. With a single stroke of the pen, it seeks to restructure all the animal markets in the country where animals are to be traded exclusively for &ldquo;agricultural purposes&rdquo; and not for slaughter. Notwithstanding finance minister Arun Jaitley&rsquo;s clarifications, please read clause 22 along with the clause 2 (b), which contains a very expansive definition of what all places are construed as &lsquo;animal market&rsquo; &ndash; it even includes &ldquo;any lairage [that is, where cattle may be rested on the way to a slaughterhouse] adjoining a market or a slaughterhouse&rdquo;!<br />&nbsp;<br />The overzealousness is also visible when one read clause 2 (e) that states, &ldquo;cattle means a bovine animal including bulls, bullocks, cows, buffalos, steers, heifers and calves and includes camels&rdquo; (emphasis added). The inspiration for making sure that all these animals that clause 2 (e) defines as cattle must be traded at animal market exclusively for &lsquo;agricultural purposes&rsquo; is said to have its origins in the directive principles of the Indian constitution. The deceit becomes obvious when one reads the directive principle and finds no mention of buffalo and camel there. <br />&nbsp;<br />So, why were camels and buffaloes added in the definition of cattle? The camel population of India is concentrated in Rajasthan and one district of Gujarat. Camels are critically endangered in parts of Jammu and Kashmir. Their numbers have been declining: there were 10 lakh head in 1992, but the number shrunk to 4 lakh in 2012. In 2014, Rajasthan declared camel the &ldquo;state animal&rdquo; and a year later promulgated the Rajasthan Camel (Prohibition of Slaughter and Regulation of Temporary Migration) Bill. However, Ilse K&ouml;hler-Rollefson, a prominent expert who has worked among Rajasthan camel breeders and herders, points out that &ldquo;this does not provide a solution to the key issues behind the crisis&rdquo;.<br /><br />Please <a href="http://www.governancenow.com/news/regular-story/battle-over-cattle" title="http://www.governancenow.com/news/regular-story/battle-over-cattle">click here</a> to read more. <br /><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 34126, 'title' => 'Battle over cattle -Himanshu Upadhyaya', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -GovernanceNow.com<br /> <br /> <em>Banning cattle slaughter, like demonetisation, may deliver political gains but will hit the rural economy hard<br /> </em><br /> More than a century ago, a team of officials from Brazil toured some villages of Kheda district, in central Gujarat. They had come to procure breeding bulls of the famous Kankreji breed, notes Bhailal Patel, a charismatic institution-builder who was also the first leader of opposition in Gujarat assembly, in his memoirs. It was of course a different India the Brazilians encountered. Cattle in those days were sold and procured without the paperwork to prove that the purchase was being made for purposes other than slaughter. It was a time when nutritionists had started calling milk a complete food and it was creating a niche in the food basket of people. </div> <div align="justify"> <br /> Not that there were no animal rights activists around then and prevention of cruelty against animals was an unheard-of phrase. On the contrary, there were several of them &ndash; the first Society for Prevention of Cruelty against Animals was founded in Calcutta in 1861 by Colesworthey Grant, and there exists a memorial for her in front of Writers&rsquo; Building &ndash; but they lobbied the government for ensuring the welfare of animals without the nefarious intent of interfering with people&rsquo;s dietary choices or imposing vigilante ideas on minorities that derive their livelihoods from livestock.<br /> &nbsp;<br /> If one looks carefully in the archives, even as a cow protection movement took roots in north India, livestock experts within the British establishment and commissariat were debating questions such as &lsquo;What good does a cattle show do in India?&rsquo; They considered whether to impose an embargo on the export of live animals of certain breeds of cattle or not. The Indian branch of the Humanitarian League started publishing several documents that focused on vegetarianism and cow protection. However, the drumming up of hysteria around cattle slaughter and vigilantism had not surfaced without sane voices articulating checks &ndash; be it Ram Mohan Roy writing in defence of beef-eating or MK Gandhi articulating a non-fanatic version of championing the cause of the cow in his Hind Swaraj.<br /> &nbsp;<br /> On May 23 this year, the ministry of environment issued &lsquo;Rules on prevention of cruelty to animals (regulation of livestock market)&rsquo; with the purported aim of regulating animal markets. When one reads the rules &ndash; notwithstanding the lame efforts from union ministers to issue clarifications &ndash; one is left with the feeling that these are drafted by overzealous persons with misplaced notions of what constitutes the welfare of livestock and livestock owners.<br /> &nbsp;<br /> Clause 22 has been the one that has come under close scrutiny, and not without reason. With a single stroke of the pen, it seeks to restructure all the animal markets in the country where animals are to be traded exclusively for &ldquo;agricultural purposes&rdquo; and not for slaughter. Notwithstanding finance minister Arun Jaitley&rsquo;s clarifications, please read clause 22 along with the clause 2 (b), which contains a very expansive definition of what all places are construed as &lsquo;animal market&rsquo; &ndash; it even includes &ldquo;any lairage [that is, where cattle may be rested on the way to a slaughterhouse] adjoining a market or a slaughterhouse&rdquo;!<br /> &nbsp;<br /> The overzealousness is also visible when one read clause 2 (e) that states, &ldquo;cattle means a bovine animal including bulls, bullocks, cows, buffalos, steers, heifers and calves and includes camels&rdquo; (emphasis added). The inspiration for making sure that all these animals that clause 2 (e) defines as cattle must be traded at animal market exclusively for &lsquo;agricultural purposes&rsquo; is said to have its origins in the directive principles of the Indian constitution. The deceit becomes obvious when one reads the directive principle and finds no mention of buffalo and camel there. <br /> &nbsp;<br /> So, why were camels and buffaloes added in the definition of cattle? The camel population of India is concentrated in Rajasthan and one district of Gujarat. Camels are critically endangered in parts of Jammu and Kashmir. Their numbers have been declining: there were 10 lakh head in 1992, but the number shrunk to 4 lakh in 2012. In 2014, Rajasthan declared camel the &ldquo;state animal&rdquo; and a year later promulgated the Rajasthan Camel (Prohibition of Slaughter and Regulation of Temporary Migration) Bill. However, Ilse K&ouml;hler-Rollefson, a prominent expert who has worked among Rajasthan camel breeders and herders, points out that &ldquo;this does not provide a solution to the key issues behind the crisis&rdquo;.<br /> <br /> Please <a href="http://www.governancenow.com/news/regular-story/battle-over-cattle">click here</a> to read more. <br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'GovernanceNow.com, 21 June, 2017, http://www.governancenow.com/news/regular-story/battle-over-cattle', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'battle-over-cattle-himanshu-upadhyaya-4682228', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4682228, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 34126 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Battle over cattle -Himanshu Upadhyaya' $metaKeywords = 'Cow Protection,Cow Slaughter,Cattle breeding,Cattle slaughter,Cattle Trade' $metaDesc = ' -GovernanceNow.com Banning cattle slaughter, like demonetisation, may deliver political gains but will hit the rural economy hard More than a century ago, a team of officials from Brazil toured some villages of Kheda district, in central Gujarat. They had come to procure...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-GovernanceNow.com<br /><br /><em>Banning cattle slaughter, like demonetisation, may deliver political gains but will hit the rural economy hard<br /></em><br />More than a century ago, a team of officials from Brazil toured some villages of Kheda district, in central Gujarat. They had come to procure breeding bulls of the famous Kankreji breed, notes Bhailal Patel, a charismatic institution-builder who was also the first leader of opposition in Gujarat assembly, in his memoirs. It was of course a different India the Brazilians encountered. Cattle in those days were sold and procured without the paperwork to prove that the purchase was being made for purposes other than slaughter. It was a time when nutritionists had started calling milk a complete food and it was creating a niche in the food basket of people.</div><div align="justify"><br />Not that there were no animal rights activists around then and prevention of cruelty against animals was an unheard-of phrase. On the contrary, there were several of them &ndash; the first Society for Prevention of Cruelty against Animals was founded in Calcutta in 1861 by Colesworthey Grant, and there exists a memorial for her in front of Writers&rsquo; Building &ndash; but they lobbied the government for ensuring the welfare of animals without the nefarious intent of interfering with people&rsquo;s dietary choices or imposing vigilante ideas on minorities that derive their livelihoods from livestock.<br />&nbsp;<br />If one looks carefully in the archives, even as a cow protection movement took roots in north India, livestock experts within the British establishment and commissariat were debating questions such as &lsquo;What good does a cattle show do in India?&rsquo; They considered whether to impose an embargo on the export of live animals of certain breeds of cattle or not. The Indian branch of the Humanitarian League started publishing several documents that focused on vegetarianism and cow protection. However, the drumming up of hysteria around cattle slaughter and vigilantism had not surfaced without sane voices articulating checks &ndash; be it Ram Mohan Roy writing in defence of beef-eating or MK Gandhi articulating a non-fanatic version of championing the cause of the cow in his Hind Swaraj.<br />&nbsp;<br />On May 23 this year, the ministry of environment issued &lsquo;Rules on prevention of cruelty to animals (regulation of livestock market)&rsquo; with the purported aim of regulating animal markets. When one reads the rules &ndash; notwithstanding the lame efforts from union ministers to issue clarifications &ndash; one is left with the feeling that these are drafted by overzealous persons with misplaced notions of what constitutes the welfare of livestock and livestock owners.<br />&nbsp;<br />Clause 22 has been the one that has come under close scrutiny, and not without reason. With a single stroke of the pen, it seeks to restructure all the animal markets in the country where animals are to be traded exclusively for &ldquo;agricultural purposes&rdquo; and not for slaughter. Notwithstanding finance minister Arun Jaitley&rsquo;s clarifications, please read clause 22 along with the clause 2 (b), which contains a very expansive definition of what all places are construed as &lsquo;animal market&rsquo; &ndash; it even includes &ldquo;any lairage [that is, where cattle may be rested on the way to a slaughterhouse] adjoining a market or a slaughterhouse&rdquo;!<br />&nbsp;<br />The overzealousness is also visible when one read clause 2 (e) that states, &ldquo;cattle means a bovine animal including bulls, bullocks, cows, buffalos, steers, heifers and calves and includes camels&rdquo; (emphasis added). The inspiration for making sure that all these animals that clause 2 (e) defines as cattle must be traded at animal market exclusively for &lsquo;agricultural purposes&rsquo; is said to have its origins in the directive principles of the Indian constitution. The deceit becomes obvious when one reads the directive principle and finds no mention of buffalo and camel there. <br />&nbsp;<br />So, why were camels and buffaloes added in the definition of cattle? The camel population of India is concentrated in Rajasthan and one district of Gujarat. Camels are critically endangered in parts of Jammu and Kashmir. Their numbers have been declining: there were 10 lakh head in 1992, but the number shrunk to 4 lakh in 2012. In 2014, Rajasthan declared camel the &ldquo;state animal&rdquo; and a year later promulgated the Rajasthan Camel (Prohibition of Slaughter and Regulation of Temporary Migration) Bill. However, Ilse K&ouml;hler-Rollefson, a prominent expert who has worked among Rajasthan camel breeders and herders, points out that &ldquo;this does not provide a solution to the key issues behind the crisis&rdquo;.<br /><br />Please <a href="http://www.governancenow.com/news/regular-story/battle-over-cattle" title="http://www.governancenow.com/news/regular-story/battle-over-cattle">click here</a> to read more. <br /><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/battle-over-cattle-himanshu-upadhyaya-4682228.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Battle over cattle -Himanshu Upadhyaya | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -GovernanceNow.com Banning cattle slaughter, like demonetisation, may deliver political gains but will hit the rural economy hard More than a century ago, a team of officials from Brazil toured some villages of Kheda district, in central Gujarat. They had come to procure..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Battle over cattle -Himanshu Upadhyaya</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-GovernanceNow.com<br /><br /><em>Banning cattle slaughter, like demonetisation, may deliver political gains but will hit the rural economy hard<br /></em><br />More than a century ago, a team of officials from Brazil toured some villages of Kheda district, in central Gujarat. They had come to procure breeding bulls of the famous Kankreji breed, notes Bhailal Patel, a charismatic institution-builder who was also the first leader of opposition in Gujarat assembly, in his memoirs. It was of course a different India the Brazilians encountered. Cattle in those days were sold and procured without the paperwork to prove that the purchase was being made for purposes other than slaughter. It was a time when nutritionists had started calling milk a complete food and it was creating a niche in the food basket of people.</div><div align="justify"><br />Not that there were no animal rights activists around then and prevention of cruelty against animals was an unheard-of phrase. On the contrary, there were several of them – the first Society for Prevention of Cruelty against Animals was founded in Calcutta in 1861 by Colesworthey Grant, and there exists a memorial for her in front of Writers’ Building – but they lobbied the government for ensuring the welfare of animals without the nefarious intent of interfering with people’s dietary choices or imposing vigilante ideas on minorities that derive their livelihoods from livestock.<br /> <br />If one looks carefully in the archives, even as a cow protection movement took roots in north India, livestock experts within the British establishment and commissariat were debating questions such as ‘What good does a cattle show do in India?’ They considered whether to impose an embargo on the export of live animals of certain breeds of cattle or not. The Indian branch of the Humanitarian League started publishing several documents that focused on vegetarianism and cow protection. However, the drumming up of hysteria around cattle slaughter and vigilantism had not surfaced without sane voices articulating checks – be it Ram Mohan Roy writing in defence of beef-eating or MK Gandhi articulating a non-fanatic version of championing the cause of the cow in his Hind Swaraj.<br /> <br />On May 23 this year, the ministry of environment issued ‘Rules on prevention of cruelty to animals (regulation of livestock market)’ with the purported aim of regulating animal markets. When one reads the rules – notwithstanding the lame efforts from union ministers to issue clarifications – one is left with the feeling that these are drafted by overzealous persons with misplaced notions of what constitutes the welfare of livestock and livestock owners.<br /> <br />Clause 22 has been the one that has come under close scrutiny, and not without reason. With a single stroke of the pen, it seeks to restructure all the animal markets in the country where animals are to be traded exclusively for “agricultural purposes” and not for slaughter. Notwithstanding finance minister Arun Jaitley’s clarifications, please read clause 22 along with the clause 2 (b), which contains a very expansive definition of what all places are construed as ‘animal market’ – it even includes “any lairage [that is, where cattle may be rested on the way to a slaughterhouse] adjoining a market or a slaughterhouse”!<br /> <br />The overzealousness is also visible when one read clause 2 (e) that states, “cattle means a bovine animal including bulls, bullocks, cows, buffalos, steers, heifers and calves and includes camels” (emphasis added). The inspiration for making sure that all these animals that clause 2 (e) defines as cattle must be traded at animal market exclusively for ‘agricultural purposes’ is said to have its origins in the directive principles of the Indian constitution. The deceit becomes obvious when one reads the directive principle and finds no mention of buffalo and camel there. <br /> <br />So, why were camels and buffaloes added in the definition of cattle? The camel population of India is concentrated in Rajasthan and one district of Gujarat. Camels are critically endangered in parts of Jammu and Kashmir. Their numbers have been declining: there were 10 lakh head in 1992, but the number shrunk to 4 lakh in 2012. In 2014, Rajasthan declared camel the “state animal” and a year later promulgated the Rajasthan Camel (Prohibition of Slaughter and Regulation of Temporary Migration) Bill. However, Ilse Köhler-Rollefson, a prominent expert who has worked among Rajasthan camel breeders and herders, points out that “this does not provide a solution to the key issues behind the crisis”.<br /><br />Please <a href="http://www.governancenow.com/news/regular-story/battle-over-cattle" title="http://www.governancenow.com/news/regular-story/battle-over-cattle">click here</a> to read more. <br /><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9608cbbc45-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9608cbbc45-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f9608cbbc45-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9608cbbc45-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9608cbbc45-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9608cbbc45-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9608cbbc45-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f9608cbbc45-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f9608cbbc45-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 34126, 'title' => 'Battle over cattle -Himanshu Upadhyaya', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -GovernanceNow.com<br /> <br /> <em>Banning cattle slaughter, like demonetisation, may deliver political gains but will hit the rural economy hard<br /> </em><br /> More than a century ago, a team of officials from Brazil toured some villages of Kheda district, in central Gujarat. They had come to procure breeding bulls of the famous Kankreji breed, notes Bhailal Patel, a charismatic institution-builder who was also the first leader of opposition in Gujarat assembly, in his memoirs. It was of course a different India the Brazilians encountered. Cattle in those days were sold and procured without the paperwork to prove that the purchase was being made for purposes other than slaughter. It was a time when nutritionists had started calling milk a complete food and it was creating a niche in the food basket of people. </div> <div align="justify"> <br /> Not that there were no animal rights activists around then and prevention of cruelty against animals was an unheard-of phrase. On the contrary, there were several of them &ndash; the first Society for Prevention of Cruelty against Animals was founded in Calcutta in 1861 by Colesworthey Grant, and there exists a memorial for her in front of Writers&rsquo; Building &ndash; but they lobbied the government for ensuring the welfare of animals without the nefarious intent of interfering with people&rsquo;s dietary choices or imposing vigilante ideas on minorities that derive their livelihoods from livestock.<br /> &nbsp;<br /> If one looks carefully in the archives, even as a cow protection movement took roots in north India, livestock experts within the British establishment and commissariat were debating questions such as &lsquo;What good does a cattle show do in India?&rsquo; They considered whether to impose an embargo on the export of live animals of certain breeds of cattle or not. The Indian branch of the Humanitarian League started publishing several documents that focused on vegetarianism and cow protection. However, the drumming up of hysteria around cattle slaughter and vigilantism had not surfaced without sane voices articulating checks &ndash; be it Ram Mohan Roy writing in defence of beef-eating or MK Gandhi articulating a non-fanatic version of championing the cause of the cow in his Hind Swaraj.<br /> &nbsp;<br /> On May 23 this year, the ministry of environment issued &lsquo;Rules on prevention of cruelty to animals (regulation of livestock market)&rsquo; with the purported aim of regulating animal markets. When one reads the rules &ndash; notwithstanding the lame efforts from union ministers to issue clarifications &ndash; one is left with the feeling that these are drafted by overzealous persons with misplaced notions of what constitutes the welfare of livestock and livestock owners.<br /> &nbsp;<br /> Clause 22 has been the one that has come under close scrutiny, and not without reason. With a single stroke of the pen, it seeks to restructure all the animal markets in the country where animals are to be traded exclusively for &ldquo;agricultural purposes&rdquo; and not for slaughter. Notwithstanding finance minister Arun Jaitley&rsquo;s clarifications, please read clause 22 along with the clause 2 (b), which contains a very expansive definition of what all places are construed as &lsquo;animal market&rsquo; &ndash; it even includes &ldquo;any lairage [that is, where cattle may be rested on the way to a slaughterhouse] adjoining a market or a slaughterhouse&rdquo;!<br /> &nbsp;<br /> The overzealousness is also visible when one read clause 2 (e) that states, &ldquo;cattle means a bovine animal including bulls, bullocks, cows, buffalos, steers, heifers and calves and includes camels&rdquo; (emphasis added). The inspiration for making sure that all these animals that clause 2 (e) defines as cattle must be traded at animal market exclusively for &lsquo;agricultural purposes&rsquo; is said to have its origins in the directive principles of the Indian constitution. The deceit becomes obvious when one reads the directive principle and finds no mention of buffalo and camel there. <br /> &nbsp;<br /> So, why were camels and buffaloes added in the definition of cattle? The camel population of India is concentrated in Rajasthan and one district of Gujarat. Camels are critically endangered in parts of Jammu and Kashmir. Their numbers have been declining: there were 10 lakh head in 1992, but the number shrunk to 4 lakh in 2012. In 2014, Rajasthan declared camel the &ldquo;state animal&rdquo; and a year later promulgated the Rajasthan Camel (Prohibition of Slaughter and Regulation of Temporary Migration) Bill. However, Ilse K&ouml;hler-Rollefson, a prominent expert who has worked among Rajasthan camel breeders and herders, points out that &ldquo;this does not provide a solution to the key issues behind the crisis&rdquo;.<br /> <br /> Please <a href="http://www.governancenow.com/news/regular-story/battle-over-cattle">click here</a> to read more. <br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'GovernanceNow.com, 21 June, 2017, http://www.governancenow.com/news/regular-story/battle-over-cattle', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'battle-over-cattle-himanshu-upadhyaya-4682228', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4682228, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 34126, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Battle over cattle -Himanshu Upadhyaya', 'metaKeywords' => 'Cow Protection,Cow Slaughter,Cattle breeding,Cattle slaughter,Cattle Trade', 'metaDesc' => ' -GovernanceNow.com Banning cattle slaughter, like demonetisation, may deliver political gains but will hit the rural economy hard More than a century ago, a team of officials from Brazil toured some villages of Kheda district, in central Gujarat. They had come to procure...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-GovernanceNow.com<br /><br /><em>Banning cattle slaughter, like demonetisation, may deliver political gains but will hit the rural economy hard<br /></em><br />More than a century ago, a team of officials from Brazil toured some villages of Kheda district, in central Gujarat. They had come to procure breeding bulls of the famous Kankreji breed, notes Bhailal Patel, a charismatic institution-builder who was also the first leader of opposition in Gujarat assembly, in his memoirs. It was of course a different India the Brazilians encountered. Cattle in those days were sold and procured without the paperwork to prove that the purchase was being made for purposes other than slaughter. It was a time when nutritionists had started calling milk a complete food and it was creating a niche in the food basket of people.</div><div align="justify"><br />Not that there were no animal rights activists around then and prevention of cruelty against animals was an unheard-of phrase. On the contrary, there were several of them &ndash; the first Society for Prevention of Cruelty against Animals was founded in Calcutta in 1861 by Colesworthey Grant, and there exists a memorial for her in front of Writers&rsquo; Building &ndash; but they lobbied the government for ensuring the welfare of animals without the nefarious intent of interfering with people&rsquo;s dietary choices or imposing vigilante ideas on minorities that derive their livelihoods from livestock.<br />&nbsp;<br />If one looks carefully in the archives, even as a cow protection movement took roots in north India, livestock experts within the British establishment and commissariat were debating questions such as &lsquo;What good does a cattle show do in India?&rsquo; They considered whether to impose an embargo on the export of live animals of certain breeds of cattle or not. The Indian branch of the Humanitarian League started publishing several documents that focused on vegetarianism and cow protection. However, the drumming up of hysteria around cattle slaughter and vigilantism had not surfaced without sane voices articulating checks &ndash; be it Ram Mohan Roy writing in defence of beef-eating or MK Gandhi articulating a non-fanatic version of championing the cause of the cow in his Hind Swaraj.<br />&nbsp;<br />On May 23 this year, the ministry of environment issued &lsquo;Rules on prevention of cruelty to animals (regulation of livestock market)&rsquo; with the purported aim of regulating animal markets. When one reads the rules &ndash; notwithstanding the lame efforts from union ministers to issue clarifications &ndash; one is left with the feeling that these are drafted by overzealous persons with misplaced notions of what constitutes the welfare of livestock and livestock owners.<br />&nbsp;<br />Clause 22 has been the one that has come under close scrutiny, and not without reason. With a single stroke of the pen, it seeks to restructure all the animal markets in the country where animals are to be traded exclusively for &ldquo;agricultural purposes&rdquo; and not for slaughter. Notwithstanding finance minister Arun Jaitley&rsquo;s clarifications, please read clause 22 along with the clause 2 (b), which contains a very expansive definition of what all places are construed as &lsquo;animal market&rsquo; &ndash; it even includes &ldquo;any lairage [that is, where cattle may be rested on the way to a slaughterhouse] adjoining a market or a slaughterhouse&rdquo;!<br />&nbsp;<br />The overzealousness is also visible when one read clause 2 (e) that states, &ldquo;cattle means a bovine animal including bulls, bullocks, cows, buffalos, steers, heifers and calves and includes camels&rdquo; (emphasis added). The inspiration for making sure that all these animals that clause 2 (e) defines as cattle must be traded at animal market exclusively for &lsquo;agricultural purposes&rsquo; is said to have its origins in the directive principles of the Indian constitution. The deceit becomes obvious when one reads the directive principle and finds no mention of buffalo and camel there. <br />&nbsp;<br />So, why were camels and buffaloes added in the definition of cattle? The camel population of India is concentrated in Rajasthan and one district of Gujarat. Camels are critically endangered in parts of Jammu and Kashmir. Their numbers have been declining: there were 10 lakh head in 1992, but the number shrunk to 4 lakh in 2012. In 2014, Rajasthan declared camel the &ldquo;state animal&rdquo; and a year later promulgated the Rajasthan Camel (Prohibition of Slaughter and Regulation of Temporary Migration) Bill. However, Ilse K&ouml;hler-Rollefson, a prominent expert who has worked among Rajasthan camel breeders and herders, points out that &ldquo;this does not provide a solution to the key issues behind the crisis&rdquo;.<br /><br />Please <a href="http://www.governancenow.com/news/regular-story/battle-over-cattle" title="http://www.governancenow.com/news/regular-story/battle-over-cattle">click here</a> to read more. <br /><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 34126, 'title' => 'Battle over cattle -Himanshu Upadhyaya', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -GovernanceNow.com<br /> <br /> <em>Banning cattle slaughter, like demonetisation, may deliver political gains but will hit the rural economy hard<br /> </em><br /> More than a century ago, a team of officials from Brazil toured some villages of Kheda district, in central Gujarat. They had come to procure breeding bulls of the famous Kankreji breed, notes Bhailal Patel, a charismatic institution-builder who was also the first leader of opposition in Gujarat assembly, in his memoirs. It was of course a different India the Brazilians encountered. Cattle in those days were sold and procured without the paperwork to prove that the purchase was being made for purposes other than slaughter. It was a time when nutritionists had started calling milk a complete food and it was creating a niche in the food basket of people. </div> <div align="justify"> <br /> Not that there were no animal rights activists around then and prevention of cruelty against animals was an unheard-of phrase. On the contrary, there were several of them &ndash; the first Society for Prevention of Cruelty against Animals was founded in Calcutta in 1861 by Colesworthey Grant, and there exists a memorial for her in front of Writers&rsquo; Building &ndash; but they lobbied the government for ensuring the welfare of animals without the nefarious intent of interfering with people&rsquo;s dietary choices or imposing vigilante ideas on minorities that derive their livelihoods from livestock.<br /> &nbsp;<br /> If one looks carefully in the archives, even as a cow protection movement took roots in north India, livestock experts within the British establishment and commissariat were debating questions such as &lsquo;What good does a cattle show do in India?&rsquo; They considered whether to impose an embargo on the export of live animals of certain breeds of cattle or not. The Indian branch of the Humanitarian League started publishing several documents that focused on vegetarianism and cow protection. However, the drumming up of hysteria around cattle slaughter and vigilantism had not surfaced without sane voices articulating checks &ndash; be it Ram Mohan Roy writing in defence of beef-eating or MK Gandhi articulating a non-fanatic version of championing the cause of the cow in his Hind Swaraj.<br /> &nbsp;<br /> On May 23 this year, the ministry of environment issued &lsquo;Rules on prevention of cruelty to animals (regulation of livestock market)&rsquo; with the purported aim of regulating animal markets. When one reads the rules &ndash; notwithstanding the lame efforts from union ministers to issue clarifications &ndash; one is left with the feeling that these are drafted by overzealous persons with misplaced notions of what constitutes the welfare of livestock and livestock owners.<br /> &nbsp;<br /> Clause 22 has been the one that has come under close scrutiny, and not without reason. With a single stroke of the pen, it seeks to restructure all the animal markets in the country where animals are to be traded exclusively for &ldquo;agricultural purposes&rdquo; and not for slaughter. Notwithstanding finance minister Arun Jaitley&rsquo;s clarifications, please read clause 22 along with the clause 2 (b), which contains a very expansive definition of what all places are construed as &lsquo;animal market&rsquo; &ndash; it even includes &ldquo;any lairage [that is, where cattle may be rested on the way to a slaughterhouse] adjoining a market or a slaughterhouse&rdquo;!<br /> &nbsp;<br /> The overzealousness is also visible when one read clause 2 (e) that states, &ldquo;cattle means a bovine animal including bulls, bullocks, cows, buffalos, steers, heifers and calves and includes camels&rdquo; (emphasis added). The inspiration for making sure that all these animals that clause 2 (e) defines as cattle must be traded at animal market exclusively for &lsquo;agricultural purposes&rsquo; is said to have its origins in the directive principles of the Indian constitution. The deceit becomes obvious when one reads the directive principle and finds no mention of buffalo and camel there. <br /> &nbsp;<br /> So, why were camels and buffaloes added in the definition of cattle? The camel population of India is concentrated in Rajasthan and one district of Gujarat. Camels are critically endangered in parts of Jammu and Kashmir. Their numbers have been declining: there were 10 lakh head in 1992, but the number shrunk to 4 lakh in 2012. In 2014, Rajasthan declared camel the &ldquo;state animal&rdquo; and a year later promulgated the Rajasthan Camel (Prohibition of Slaughter and Regulation of Temporary Migration) Bill. However, Ilse K&ouml;hler-Rollefson, a prominent expert who has worked among Rajasthan camel breeders and herders, points out that &ldquo;this does not provide a solution to the key issues behind the crisis&rdquo;.<br /> <br /> Please <a href="http://www.governancenow.com/news/regular-story/battle-over-cattle">click here</a> to read more. <br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'GovernanceNow.com, 21 June, 2017, http://www.governancenow.com/news/regular-story/battle-over-cattle', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'battle-over-cattle-himanshu-upadhyaya-4682228', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4682228, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 34126 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Battle over cattle -Himanshu Upadhyaya' $metaKeywords = 'Cow Protection,Cow Slaughter,Cattle breeding,Cattle slaughter,Cattle Trade' $metaDesc = ' -GovernanceNow.com Banning cattle slaughter, like demonetisation, may deliver political gains but will hit the rural economy hard More than a century ago, a team of officials from Brazil toured some villages of Kheda district, in central Gujarat. They had come to procure...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-GovernanceNow.com<br /><br /><em>Banning cattle slaughter, like demonetisation, may deliver political gains but will hit the rural economy hard<br /></em><br />More than a century ago, a team of officials from Brazil toured some villages of Kheda district, in central Gujarat. They had come to procure breeding bulls of the famous Kankreji breed, notes Bhailal Patel, a charismatic institution-builder who was also the first leader of opposition in Gujarat assembly, in his memoirs. It was of course a different India the Brazilians encountered. Cattle in those days were sold and procured without the paperwork to prove that the purchase was being made for purposes other than slaughter. It was a time when nutritionists had started calling milk a complete food and it was creating a niche in the food basket of people.</div><div align="justify"><br />Not that there were no animal rights activists around then and prevention of cruelty against animals was an unheard-of phrase. On the contrary, there were several of them &ndash; the first Society for Prevention of Cruelty against Animals was founded in Calcutta in 1861 by Colesworthey Grant, and there exists a memorial for her in front of Writers&rsquo; Building &ndash; but they lobbied the government for ensuring the welfare of animals without the nefarious intent of interfering with people&rsquo;s dietary choices or imposing vigilante ideas on minorities that derive their livelihoods from livestock.<br />&nbsp;<br />If one looks carefully in the archives, even as a cow protection movement took roots in north India, livestock experts within the British establishment and commissariat were debating questions such as &lsquo;What good does a cattle show do in India?&rsquo; They considered whether to impose an embargo on the export of live animals of certain breeds of cattle or not. The Indian branch of the Humanitarian League started publishing several documents that focused on vegetarianism and cow protection. However, the drumming up of hysteria around cattle slaughter and vigilantism had not surfaced without sane voices articulating checks &ndash; be it Ram Mohan Roy writing in defence of beef-eating or MK Gandhi articulating a non-fanatic version of championing the cause of the cow in his Hind Swaraj.<br />&nbsp;<br />On May 23 this year, the ministry of environment issued &lsquo;Rules on prevention of cruelty to animals (regulation of livestock market)&rsquo; with the purported aim of regulating animal markets. When one reads the rules &ndash; notwithstanding the lame efforts from union ministers to issue clarifications &ndash; one is left with the feeling that these are drafted by overzealous persons with misplaced notions of what constitutes the welfare of livestock and livestock owners.<br />&nbsp;<br />Clause 22 has been the one that has come under close scrutiny, and not without reason. With a single stroke of the pen, it seeks to restructure all the animal markets in the country where animals are to be traded exclusively for &ldquo;agricultural purposes&rdquo; and not for slaughter. Notwithstanding finance minister Arun Jaitley&rsquo;s clarifications, please read clause 22 along with the clause 2 (b), which contains a very expansive definition of what all places are construed as &lsquo;animal market&rsquo; &ndash; it even includes &ldquo;any lairage [that is, where cattle may be rested on the way to a slaughterhouse] adjoining a market or a slaughterhouse&rdquo;!<br />&nbsp;<br />The overzealousness is also visible when one read clause 2 (e) that states, &ldquo;cattle means a bovine animal including bulls, bullocks, cows, buffalos, steers, heifers and calves and includes camels&rdquo; (emphasis added). The inspiration for making sure that all these animals that clause 2 (e) defines as cattle must be traded at animal market exclusively for &lsquo;agricultural purposes&rsquo; is said to have its origins in the directive principles of the Indian constitution. The deceit becomes obvious when one reads the directive principle and finds no mention of buffalo and camel there. <br />&nbsp;<br />So, why were camels and buffaloes added in the definition of cattle? The camel population of India is concentrated in Rajasthan and one district of Gujarat. Camels are critically endangered in parts of Jammu and Kashmir. Their numbers have been declining: there were 10 lakh head in 1992, but the number shrunk to 4 lakh in 2012. In 2014, Rajasthan declared camel the &ldquo;state animal&rdquo; and a year later promulgated the Rajasthan Camel (Prohibition of Slaughter and Regulation of Temporary Migration) Bill. However, Ilse K&ouml;hler-Rollefson, a prominent expert who has worked among Rajasthan camel breeders and herders, points out that &ldquo;this does not provide a solution to the key issues behind the crisis&rdquo;.<br /><br />Please <a href="http://www.governancenow.com/news/regular-story/battle-over-cattle" title="http://www.governancenow.com/news/regular-story/battle-over-cattle">click here</a> to read more. <br /><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/battle-over-cattle-himanshu-upadhyaya-4682228.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Battle over cattle -Himanshu Upadhyaya | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -GovernanceNow.com Banning cattle slaughter, like demonetisation, may deliver political gains but will hit the rural economy hard More than a century ago, a team of officials from Brazil toured some villages of Kheda district, in central Gujarat. They had come to procure..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Battle over cattle -Himanshu Upadhyaya</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-GovernanceNow.com<br /><br /><em>Banning cattle slaughter, like demonetisation, may deliver political gains but will hit the rural economy hard<br /></em><br />More than a century ago, a team of officials from Brazil toured some villages of Kheda district, in central Gujarat. They had come to procure breeding bulls of the famous Kankreji breed, notes Bhailal Patel, a charismatic institution-builder who was also the first leader of opposition in Gujarat assembly, in his memoirs. It was of course a different India the Brazilians encountered. Cattle in those days were sold and procured without the paperwork to prove that the purchase was being made for purposes other than slaughter. It was a time when nutritionists had started calling milk a complete food and it was creating a niche in the food basket of people.</div><div align="justify"><br />Not that there were no animal rights activists around then and prevention of cruelty against animals was an unheard-of phrase. On the contrary, there were several of them – the first Society for Prevention of Cruelty against Animals was founded in Calcutta in 1861 by Colesworthey Grant, and there exists a memorial for her in front of Writers’ Building – but they lobbied the government for ensuring the welfare of animals without the nefarious intent of interfering with people’s dietary choices or imposing vigilante ideas on minorities that derive their livelihoods from livestock.<br /> <br />If one looks carefully in the archives, even as a cow protection movement took roots in north India, livestock experts within the British establishment and commissariat were debating questions such as ‘What good does a cattle show do in India?’ They considered whether to impose an embargo on the export of live animals of certain breeds of cattle or not. The Indian branch of the Humanitarian League started publishing several documents that focused on vegetarianism and cow protection. However, the drumming up of hysteria around cattle slaughter and vigilantism had not surfaced without sane voices articulating checks – be it Ram Mohan Roy writing in defence of beef-eating or MK Gandhi articulating a non-fanatic version of championing the cause of the cow in his Hind Swaraj.<br /> <br />On May 23 this year, the ministry of environment issued ‘Rules on prevention of cruelty to animals (regulation of livestock market)’ with the purported aim of regulating animal markets. When one reads the rules – notwithstanding the lame efforts from union ministers to issue clarifications – one is left with the feeling that these are drafted by overzealous persons with misplaced notions of what constitutes the welfare of livestock and livestock owners.<br /> <br />Clause 22 has been the one that has come under close scrutiny, and not without reason. With a single stroke of the pen, it seeks to restructure all the animal markets in the country where animals are to be traded exclusively for “agricultural purposes” and not for slaughter. Notwithstanding finance minister Arun Jaitley’s clarifications, please read clause 22 along with the clause 2 (b), which contains a very expansive definition of what all places are construed as ‘animal market’ – it even includes “any lairage [that is, where cattle may be rested on the way to a slaughterhouse] adjoining a market or a slaughterhouse”!<br /> <br />The overzealousness is also visible when one read clause 2 (e) that states, “cattle means a bovine animal including bulls, bullocks, cows, buffalos, steers, heifers and calves and includes camels” (emphasis added). The inspiration for making sure that all these animals that clause 2 (e) defines as cattle must be traded at animal market exclusively for ‘agricultural purposes’ is said to have its origins in the directive principles of the Indian constitution. The deceit becomes obvious when one reads the directive principle and finds no mention of buffalo and camel there. <br /> <br />So, why were camels and buffaloes added in the definition of cattle? The camel population of India is concentrated in Rajasthan and one district of Gujarat. Camels are critically endangered in parts of Jammu and Kashmir. Their numbers have been declining: there were 10 lakh head in 1992, but the number shrunk to 4 lakh in 2012. In 2014, Rajasthan declared camel the “state animal” and a year later promulgated the Rajasthan Camel (Prohibition of Slaughter and Regulation of Temporary Migration) Bill. However, Ilse Köhler-Rollefson, a prominent expert who has worked among Rajasthan camel breeders and herders, points out that “this does not provide a solution to the key issues behind the crisis”.<br /><br />Please <a href="http://www.governancenow.com/news/regular-story/battle-over-cattle" title="http://www.governancenow.com/news/regular-story/battle-over-cattle">click here</a> to read more. <br /><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9608cbbc45-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9608cbbc45-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f9608cbbc45-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9608cbbc45-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9608cbbc45-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9608cbbc45-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f9608cbbc45-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f9608cbbc45-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f9608cbbc45-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 34126, 'title' => 'Battle over cattle -Himanshu Upadhyaya', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -GovernanceNow.com<br /> <br /> <em>Banning cattle slaughter, like demonetisation, may deliver political gains but will hit the rural economy hard<br /> </em><br /> More than a century ago, a team of officials from Brazil toured some villages of Kheda district, in central Gujarat. They had come to procure breeding bulls of the famous Kankreji breed, notes Bhailal Patel, a charismatic institution-builder who was also the first leader of opposition in Gujarat assembly, in his memoirs. It was of course a different India the Brazilians encountered. Cattle in those days were sold and procured without the paperwork to prove that the purchase was being made for purposes other than slaughter. It was a time when nutritionists had started calling milk a complete food and it was creating a niche in the food basket of people. </div> <div align="justify"> <br /> Not that there were no animal rights activists around then and prevention of cruelty against animals was an unheard-of phrase. On the contrary, there were several of them &ndash; the first Society for Prevention of Cruelty against Animals was founded in Calcutta in 1861 by Colesworthey Grant, and there exists a memorial for her in front of Writers&rsquo; Building &ndash; but they lobbied the government for ensuring the welfare of animals without the nefarious intent of interfering with people&rsquo;s dietary choices or imposing vigilante ideas on minorities that derive their livelihoods from livestock.<br /> &nbsp;<br /> If one looks carefully in the archives, even as a cow protection movement took roots in north India, livestock experts within the British establishment and commissariat were debating questions such as &lsquo;What good does a cattle show do in India?&rsquo; They considered whether to impose an embargo on the export of live animals of certain breeds of cattle or not. The Indian branch of the Humanitarian League started publishing several documents that focused on vegetarianism and cow protection. However, the drumming up of hysteria around cattle slaughter and vigilantism had not surfaced without sane voices articulating checks &ndash; be it Ram Mohan Roy writing in defence of beef-eating or MK Gandhi articulating a non-fanatic version of championing the cause of the cow in his Hind Swaraj.<br /> &nbsp;<br /> On May 23 this year, the ministry of environment issued &lsquo;Rules on prevention of cruelty to animals (regulation of livestock market)&rsquo; with the purported aim of regulating animal markets. When one reads the rules &ndash; notwithstanding the lame efforts from union ministers to issue clarifications &ndash; one is left with the feeling that these are drafted by overzealous persons with misplaced notions of what constitutes the welfare of livestock and livestock owners.<br /> &nbsp;<br /> Clause 22 has been the one that has come under close scrutiny, and not without reason. With a single stroke of the pen, it seeks to restructure all the animal markets in the country where animals are to be traded exclusively for &ldquo;agricultural purposes&rdquo; and not for slaughter. Notwithstanding finance minister Arun Jaitley&rsquo;s clarifications, please read clause 22 along with the clause 2 (b), which contains a very expansive definition of what all places are construed as &lsquo;animal market&rsquo; &ndash; it even includes &ldquo;any lairage [that is, where cattle may be rested on the way to a slaughterhouse] adjoining a market or a slaughterhouse&rdquo;!<br /> &nbsp;<br /> The overzealousness is also visible when one read clause 2 (e) that states, &ldquo;cattle means a bovine animal including bulls, bullocks, cows, buffalos, steers, heifers and calves and includes camels&rdquo; (emphasis added). The inspiration for making sure that all these animals that clause 2 (e) defines as cattle must be traded at animal market exclusively for &lsquo;agricultural purposes&rsquo; is said to have its origins in the directive principles of the Indian constitution. The deceit becomes obvious when one reads the directive principle and finds no mention of buffalo and camel there. <br /> &nbsp;<br /> So, why were camels and buffaloes added in the definition of cattle? The camel population of India is concentrated in Rajasthan and one district of Gujarat. Camels are critically endangered in parts of Jammu and Kashmir. Their numbers have been declining: there were 10 lakh head in 1992, but the number shrunk to 4 lakh in 2012. In 2014, Rajasthan declared camel the &ldquo;state animal&rdquo; and a year later promulgated the Rajasthan Camel (Prohibition of Slaughter and Regulation of Temporary Migration) Bill. However, Ilse K&ouml;hler-Rollefson, a prominent expert who has worked among Rajasthan camel breeders and herders, points out that &ldquo;this does not provide a solution to the key issues behind the crisis&rdquo;.<br /> <br /> Please <a href="http://www.governancenow.com/news/regular-story/battle-over-cattle">click here</a> to read more. <br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'GovernanceNow.com, 21 June, 2017, http://www.governancenow.com/news/regular-story/battle-over-cattle', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'battle-over-cattle-himanshu-upadhyaya-4682228', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4682228, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 34126, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Battle over cattle -Himanshu Upadhyaya', 'metaKeywords' => 'Cow Protection,Cow Slaughter,Cattle breeding,Cattle slaughter,Cattle Trade', 'metaDesc' => ' -GovernanceNow.com Banning cattle slaughter, like demonetisation, may deliver political gains but will hit the rural economy hard More than a century ago, a team of officials from Brazil toured some villages of Kheda district, in central Gujarat. They had come to procure...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-GovernanceNow.com<br /><br /><em>Banning cattle slaughter, like demonetisation, may deliver political gains but will hit the rural economy hard<br /></em><br />More than a century ago, a team of officials from Brazil toured some villages of Kheda district, in central Gujarat. They had come to procure breeding bulls of the famous Kankreji breed, notes Bhailal Patel, a charismatic institution-builder who was also the first leader of opposition in Gujarat assembly, in his memoirs. It was of course a different India the Brazilians encountered. Cattle in those days were sold and procured without the paperwork to prove that the purchase was being made for purposes other than slaughter. It was a time when nutritionists had started calling milk a complete food and it was creating a niche in the food basket of people.</div><div align="justify"><br />Not that there were no animal rights activists around then and prevention of cruelty against animals was an unheard-of phrase. On the contrary, there were several of them &ndash; the first Society for Prevention of Cruelty against Animals was founded in Calcutta in 1861 by Colesworthey Grant, and there exists a memorial for her in front of Writers&rsquo; Building &ndash; but they lobbied the government for ensuring the welfare of animals without the nefarious intent of interfering with people&rsquo;s dietary choices or imposing vigilante ideas on minorities that derive their livelihoods from livestock.<br />&nbsp;<br />If one looks carefully in the archives, even as a cow protection movement took roots in north India, livestock experts within the British establishment and commissariat were debating questions such as &lsquo;What good does a cattle show do in India?&rsquo; They considered whether to impose an embargo on the export of live animals of certain breeds of cattle or not. The Indian branch of the Humanitarian League started publishing several documents that focused on vegetarianism and cow protection. However, the drumming up of hysteria around cattle slaughter and vigilantism had not surfaced without sane voices articulating checks &ndash; be it Ram Mohan Roy writing in defence of beef-eating or MK Gandhi articulating a non-fanatic version of championing the cause of the cow in his Hind Swaraj.<br />&nbsp;<br />On May 23 this year, the ministry of environment issued &lsquo;Rules on prevention of cruelty to animals (regulation of livestock market)&rsquo; with the purported aim of regulating animal markets. When one reads the rules &ndash; notwithstanding the lame efforts from union ministers to issue clarifications &ndash; one is left with the feeling that these are drafted by overzealous persons with misplaced notions of what constitutes the welfare of livestock and livestock owners.<br />&nbsp;<br />Clause 22 has been the one that has come under close scrutiny, and not without reason. With a single stroke of the pen, it seeks to restructure all the animal markets in the country where animals are to be traded exclusively for &ldquo;agricultural purposes&rdquo; and not for slaughter. Notwithstanding finance minister Arun Jaitley&rsquo;s clarifications, please read clause 22 along with the clause 2 (b), which contains a very expansive definition of what all places are construed as &lsquo;animal market&rsquo; &ndash; it even includes &ldquo;any lairage [that is, where cattle may be rested on the way to a slaughterhouse] adjoining a market or a slaughterhouse&rdquo;!<br />&nbsp;<br />The overzealousness is also visible when one read clause 2 (e) that states, &ldquo;cattle means a bovine animal including bulls, bullocks, cows, buffalos, steers, heifers and calves and includes camels&rdquo; (emphasis added). The inspiration for making sure that all these animals that clause 2 (e) defines as cattle must be traded at animal market exclusively for &lsquo;agricultural purposes&rsquo; is said to have its origins in the directive principles of the Indian constitution. The deceit becomes obvious when one reads the directive principle and finds no mention of buffalo and camel there. <br />&nbsp;<br />So, why were camels and buffaloes added in the definition of cattle? The camel population of India is concentrated in Rajasthan and one district of Gujarat. Camels are critically endangered in parts of Jammu and Kashmir. Their numbers have been declining: there were 10 lakh head in 1992, but the number shrunk to 4 lakh in 2012. In 2014, Rajasthan declared camel the &ldquo;state animal&rdquo; and a year later promulgated the Rajasthan Camel (Prohibition of Slaughter and Regulation of Temporary Migration) Bill. However, Ilse K&ouml;hler-Rollefson, a prominent expert who has worked among Rajasthan camel breeders and herders, points out that &ldquo;this does not provide a solution to the key issues behind the crisis&rdquo;.<br /><br />Please <a href="http://www.governancenow.com/news/regular-story/battle-over-cattle" title="http://www.governancenow.com/news/regular-story/battle-over-cattle">click here</a> to read more. <br /><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 34126, 'title' => 'Battle over cattle -Himanshu Upadhyaya', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -GovernanceNow.com<br /> <br /> <em>Banning cattle slaughter, like demonetisation, may deliver political gains but will hit the rural economy hard<br /> </em><br /> More than a century ago, a team of officials from Brazil toured some villages of Kheda district, in central Gujarat. They had come to procure breeding bulls of the famous Kankreji breed, notes Bhailal Patel, a charismatic institution-builder who was also the first leader of opposition in Gujarat assembly, in his memoirs. It was of course a different India the Brazilians encountered. Cattle in those days were sold and procured without the paperwork to prove that the purchase was being made for purposes other than slaughter. It was a time when nutritionists had started calling milk a complete food and it was creating a niche in the food basket of people. </div> <div align="justify"> <br /> Not that there were no animal rights activists around then and prevention of cruelty against animals was an unheard-of phrase. On the contrary, there were several of them &ndash; the first Society for Prevention of Cruelty against Animals was founded in Calcutta in 1861 by Colesworthey Grant, and there exists a memorial for her in front of Writers&rsquo; Building &ndash; but they lobbied the government for ensuring the welfare of animals without the nefarious intent of interfering with people&rsquo;s dietary choices or imposing vigilante ideas on minorities that derive their livelihoods from livestock.<br /> &nbsp;<br /> If one looks carefully in the archives, even as a cow protection movement took roots in north India, livestock experts within the British establishment and commissariat were debating questions such as &lsquo;What good does a cattle show do in India?&rsquo; They considered whether to impose an embargo on the export of live animals of certain breeds of cattle or not. The Indian branch of the Humanitarian League started publishing several documents that focused on vegetarianism and cow protection. However, the drumming up of hysteria around cattle slaughter and vigilantism had not surfaced without sane voices articulating checks &ndash; be it Ram Mohan Roy writing in defence of beef-eating or MK Gandhi articulating a non-fanatic version of championing the cause of the cow in his Hind Swaraj.<br /> &nbsp;<br /> On May 23 this year, the ministry of environment issued &lsquo;Rules on prevention of cruelty to animals (regulation of livestock market)&rsquo; with the purported aim of regulating animal markets. When one reads the rules &ndash; notwithstanding the lame efforts from union ministers to issue clarifications &ndash; one is left with the feeling that these are drafted by overzealous persons with misplaced notions of what constitutes the welfare of livestock and livestock owners.<br /> &nbsp;<br /> Clause 22 has been the one that has come under close scrutiny, and not without reason. With a single stroke of the pen, it seeks to restructure all the animal markets in the country where animals are to be traded exclusively for &ldquo;agricultural purposes&rdquo; and not for slaughter. Notwithstanding finance minister Arun Jaitley&rsquo;s clarifications, please read clause 22 along with the clause 2 (b), which contains a very expansive definition of what all places are construed as &lsquo;animal market&rsquo; &ndash; it even includes &ldquo;any lairage [that is, where cattle may be rested on the way to a slaughterhouse] adjoining a market or a slaughterhouse&rdquo;!<br /> &nbsp;<br /> The overzealousness is also visible when one read clause 2 (e) that states, &ldquo;cattle means a bovine animal including bulls, bullocks, cows, buffalos, steers, heifers and calves and includes camels&rdquo; (emphasis added). The inspiration for making sure that all these animals that clause 2 (e) defines as cattle must be traded at animal market exclusively for &lsquo;agricultural purposes&rsquo; is said to have its origins in the directive principles of the Indian constitution. The deceit becomes obvious when one reads the directive principle and finds no mention of buffalo and camel there. <br /> &nbsp;<br /> So, why were camels and buffaloes added in the definition of cattle? The camel population of India is concentrated in Rajasthan and one district of Gujarat. Camels are critically endangered in parts of Jammu and Kashmir. Their numbers have been declining: there were 10 lakh head in 1992, but the number shrunk to 4 lakh in 2012. In 2014, Rajasthan declared camel the &ldquo;state animal&rdquo; and a year later promulgated the Rajasthan Camel (Prohibition of Slaughter and Regulation of Temporary Migration) Bill. However, Ilse K&ouml;hler-Rollefson, a prominent expert who has worked among Rajasthan camel breeders and herders, points out that &ldquo;this does not provide a solution to the key issues behind the crisis&rdquo;.<br /> <br /> Please <a href="http://www.governancenow.com/news/regular-story/battle-over-cattle">click here</a> to read more. <br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'GovernanceNow.com, 21 June, 2017, http://www.governancenow.com/news/regular-story/battle-over-cattle', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'battle-over-cattle-himanshu-upadhyaya-4682228', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4682228, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 34126 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Battle over cattle -Himanshu Upadhyaya' $metaKeywords = 'Cow Protection,Cow Slaughter,Cattle breeding,Cattle slaughter,Cattle Trade' $metaDesc = ' -GovernanceNow.com Banning cattle slaughter, like demonetisation, may deliver political gains but will hit the rural economy hard More than a century ago, a team of officials from Brazil toured some villages of Kheda district, in central Gujarat. They had come to procure...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-GovernanceNow.com<br /><br /><em>Banning cattle slaughter, like demonetisation, may deliver political gains but will hit the rural economy hard<br /></em><br />More than a century ago, a team of officials from Brazil toured some villages of Kheda district, in central Gujarat. They had come to procure breeding bulls of the famous Kankreji breed, notes Bhailal Patel, a charismatic institution-builder who was also the first leader of opposition in Gujarat assembly, in his memoirs. It was of course a different India the Brazilians encountered. Cattle in those days were sold and procured without the paperwork to prove that the purchase was being made for purposes other than slaughter. It was a time when nutritionists had started calling milk a complete food and it was creating a niche in the food basket of people.</div><div align="justify"><br />Not that there were no animal rights activists around then and prevention of cruelty against animals was an unheard-of phrase. On the contrary, there were several of them &ndash; the first Society for Prevention of Cruelty against Animals was founded in Calcutta in 1861 by Colesworthey Grant, and there exists a memorial for her in front of Writers&rsquo; Building &ndash; but they lobbied the government for ensuring the welfare of animals without the nefarious intent of interfering with people&rsquo;s dietary choices or imposing vigilante ideas on minorities that derive their livelihoods from livestock.<br />&nbsp;<br />If one looks carefully in the archives, even as a cow protection movement took roots in north India, livestock experts within the British establishment and commissariat were debating questions such as &lsquo;What good does a cattle show do in India?&rsquo; They considered whether to impose an embargo on the export of live animals of certain breeds of cattle or not. The Indian branch of the Humanitarian League started publishing several documents that focused on vegetarianism and cow protection. However, the drumming up of hysteria around cattle slaughter and vigilantism had not surfaced without sane voices articulating checks &ndash; be it Ram Mohan Roy writing in defence of beef-eating or MK Gandhi articulating a non-fanatic version of championing the cause of the cow in his Hind Swaraj.<br />&nbsp;<br />On May 23 this year, the ministry of environment issued &lsquo;Rules on prevention of cruelty to animals (regulation of livestock market)&rsquo; with the purported aim of regulating animal markets. When one reads the rules &ndash; notwithstanding the lame efforts from union ministers to issue clarifications &ndash; one is left with the feeling that these are drafted by overzealous persons with misplaced notions of what constitutes the welfare of livestock and livestock owners.<br />&nbsp;<br />Clause 22 has been the one that has come under close scrutiny, and not without reason. With a single stroke of the pen, it seeks to restructure all the animal markets in the country where animals are to be traded exclusively for &ldquo;agricultural purposes&rdquo; and not for slaughter. Notwithstanding finance minister Arun Jaitley&rsquo;s clarifications, please read clause 22 along with the clause 2 (b), which contains a very expansive definition of what all places are construed as &lsquo;animal market&rsquo; &ndash; it even includes &ldquo;any lairage [that is, where cattle may be rested on the way to a slaughterhouse] adjoining a market or a slaughterhouse&rdquo;!<br />&nbsp;<br />The overzealousness is also visible when one read clause 2 (e) that states, &ldquo;cattle means a bovine animal including bulls, bullocks, cows, buffalos, steers, heifers and calves and includes camels&rdquo; (emphasis added). The inspiration for making sure that all these animals that clause 2 (e) defines as cattle must be traded at animal market exclusively for &lsquo;agricultural purposes&rsquo; is said to have its origins in the directive principles of the Indian constitution. The deceit becomes obvious when one reads the directive principle and finds no mention of buffalo and camel there. <br />&nbsp;<br />So, why were camels and buffaloes added in the definition of cattle? The camel population of India is concentrated in Rajasthan and one district of Gujarat. Camels are critically endangered in parts of Jammu and Kashmir. Their numbers have been declining: there were 10 lakh head in 1992, but the number shrunk to 4 lakh in 2012. In 2014, Rajasthan declared camel the &ldquo;state animal&rdquo; and a year later promulgated the Rajasthan Camel (Prohibition of Slaughter and Regulation of Temporary Migration) Bill. However, Ilse K&ouml;hler-Rollefson, a prominent expert who has worked among Rajasthan camel breeders and herders, points out that &ldquo;this does not provide a solution to the key issues behind the crisis&rdquo;.<br /><br />Please <a href="http://www.governancenow.com/news/regular-story/battle-over-cattle" title="http://www.governancenow.com/news/regular-story/battle-over-cattle">click here</a> to read more. <br /><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/battle-over-cattle-himanshu-upadhyaya-4682228.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Battle over cattle -Himanshu Upadhyaya | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -GovernanceNow.com Banning cattle slaughter, like demonetisation, may deliver political gains but will hit the rural economy hard More than a century ago, a team of officials from Brazil toured some villages of Kheda district, in central Gujarat. They had come to procure..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Battle over cattle -Himanshu Upadhyaya</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div align="justify">-GovernanceNow.com<br /><br /><em>Banning cattle slaughter, like demonetisation, may deliver political gains but will hit the rural economy hard<br /></em><br />More than a century ago, a team of officials from Brazil toured some villages of Kheda district, in central Gujarat. They had come to procure breeding bulls of the famous Kankreji breed, notes Bhailal Patel, a charismatic institution-builder who was also the first leader of opposition in Gujarat assembly, in his memoirs. It was of course a different India the Brazilians encountered. Cattle in those days were sold and procured without the paperwork to prove that the purchase was being made for purposes other than slaughter. It was a time when nutritionists had started calling milk a complete food and it was creating a niche in the food basket of people.</div><div align="justify"><br />Not that there were no animal rights activists around then and prevention of cruelty against animals was an unheard-of phrase. On the contrary, there were several of them – the first Society for Prevention of Cruelty against Animals was founded in Calcutta in 1861 by Colesworthey Grant, and there exists a memorial for her in front of Writers’ Building – but they lobbied the government for ensuring the welfare of animals without the nefarious intent of interfering with people’s dietary choices or imposing vigilante ideas on minorities that derive their livelihoods from livestock.<br /> <br />If one looks carefully in the archives, even as a cow protection movement took roots in north India, livestock experts within the British establishment and commissariat were debating questions such as ‘What good does a cattle show do in India?’ They considered whether to impose an embargo on the export of live animals of certain breeds of cattle or not. The Indian branch of the Humanitarian League started publishing several documents that focused on vegetarianism and cow protection. However, the drumming up of hysteria around cattle slaughter and vigilantism had not surfaced without sane voices articulating checks – be it Ram Mohan Roy writing in defence of beef-eating or MK Gandhi articulating a non-fanatic version of championing the cause of the cow in his Hind Swaraj.<br /> <br />On May 23 this year, the ministry of environment issued ‘Rules on prevention of cruelty to animals (regulation of livestock market)’ with the purported aim of regulating animal markets. When one reads the rules – notwithstanding the lame efforts from union ministers to issue clarifications – one is left with the feeling that these are drafted by overzealous persons with misplaced notions of what constitutes the welfare of livestock and livestock owners.<br /> <br />Clause 22 has been the one that has come under close scrutiny, and not without reason. With a single stroke of the pen, it seeks to restructure all the animal markets in the country where animals are to be traded exclusively for “agricultural purposes” and not for slaughter. Notwithstanding finance minister Arun Jaitley’s clarifications, please read clause 22 along with the clause 2 (b), which contains a very expansive definition of what all places are construed as ‘animal market’ – it even includes “any lairage [that is, where cattle may be rested on the way to a slaughterhouse] adjoining a market or a slaughterhouse”!<br /> <br />The overzealousness is also visible when one read clause 2 (e) that states, “cattle means a bovine animal including bulls, bullocks, cows, buffalos, steers, heifers and calves and includes camels” (emphasis added). The inspiration for making sure that all these animals that clause 2 (e) defines as cattle must be traded at animal market exclusively for ‘agricultural purposes’ is said to have its origins in the directive principles of the Indian constitution. The deceit becomes obvious when one reads the directive principle and finds no mention of buffalo and camel there. <br /> <br />So, why were camels and buffaloes added in the definition of cattle? The camel population of India is concentrated in Rajasthan and one district of Gujarat. Camels are critically endangered in parts of Jammu and Kashmir. Their numbers have been declining: there were 10 lakh head in 1992, but the number shrunk to 4 lakh in 2012. In 2014, Rajasthan declared camel the “state animal” and a year later promulgated the Rajasthan Camel (Prohibition of Slaughter and Regulation of Temporary Migration) Bill. However, Ilse Köhler-Rollefson, a prominent expert who has worked among Rajasthan camel breeders and herders, points out that “this does not provide a solution to the key issues behind the crisis”.<br /><br />Please <a href="http://www.governancenow.com/news/regular-story/battle-over-cattle" title="http://www.governancenow.com/news/regular-story/battle-over-cattle">click here</a> to read more. <br /><br /></div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 34126, 'title' => 'Battle over cattle -Himanshu Upadhyaya', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -GovernanceNow.com<br /> <br /> <em>Banning cattle slaughter, like demonetisation, may deliver political gains but will hit the rural economy hard<br /> </em><br /> More than a century ago, a team of officials from Brazil toured some villages of Kheda district, in central Gujarat. They had come to procure breeding bulls of the famous Kankreji breed, notes Bhailal Patel, a charismatic institution-builder who was also the first leader of opposition in Gujarat assembly, in his memoirs. It was of course a different India the Brazilians encountered. Cattle in those days were sold and procured without the paperwork to prove that the purchase was being made for purposes other than slaughter. It was a time when nutritionists had started calling milk a complete food and it was creating a niche in the food basket of people. </div> <div align="justify"> <br /> Not that there were no animal rights activists around then and prevention of cruelty against animals was an unheard-of phrase. On the contrary, there were several of them – the first Society for Prevention of Cruelty against Animals was founded in Calcutta in 1861 by Colesworthey Grant, and there exists a memorial for her in front of Writers’ Building – but they lobbied the government for ensuring the welfare of animals without the nefarious intent of interfering with people’s dietary choices or imposing vigilante ideas on minorities that derive their livelihoods from livestock.<br /> <br /> If one looks carefully in the archives, even as a cow protection movement took roots in north India, livestock experts within the British establishment and commissariat were debating questions such as ‘What good does a cattle show do in India?’ They considered whether to impose an embargo on the export of live animals of certain breeds of cattle or not. The Indian branch of the Humanitarian League started publishing several documents that focused on vegetarianism and cow protection. However, the drumming up of hysteria around cattle slaughter and vigilantism had not surfaced without sane voices articulating checks – be it Ram Mohan Roy writing in defence of beef-eating or MK Gandhi articulating a non-fanatic version of championing the cause of the cow in his Hind Swaraj.<br /> <br /> On May 23 this year, the ministry of environment issued ‘Rules on prevention of cruelty to animals (regulation of livestock market)’ with the purported aim of regulating animal markets. When one reads the rules – notwithstanding the lame efforts from union ministers to issue clarifications – one is left with the feeling that these are drafted by overzealous persons with misplaced notions of what constitutes the welfare of livestock and livestock owners.<br /> <br /> Clause 22 has been the one that has come under close scrutiny, and not without reason. With a single stroke of the pen, it seeks to restructure all the animal markets in the country where animals are to be traded exclusively for “agricultural purposes” and not for slaughter. Notwithstanding finance minister Arun Jaitley’s clarifications, please read clause 22 along with the clause 2 (b), which contains a very expansive definition of what all places are construed as ‘animal market’ – it even includes “any lairage [that is, where cattle may be rested on the way to a slaughterhouse] adjoining a market or a slaughterhouse”!<br /> <br /> The overzealousness is also visible when one read clause 2 (e) that states, “cattle means a bovine animal including bulls, bullocks, cows, buffalos, steers, heifers and calves and includes camels” (emphasis added). The inspiration for making sure that all these animals that clause 2 (e) defines as cattle must be traded at animal market exclusively for ‘agricultural purposes’ is said to have its origins in the directive principles of the Indian constitution. The deceit becomes obvious when one reads the directive principle and finds no mention of buffalo and camel there. <br /> <br /> So, why were camels and buffaloes added in the definition of cattle? The camel population of India is concentrated in Rajasthan and one district of Gujarat. Camels are critically endangered in parts of Jammu and Kashmir. Their numbers have been declining: there were 10 lakh head in 1992, but the number shrunk to 4 lakh in 2012. In 2014, Rajasthan declared camel the “state animal” and a year later promulgated the Rajasthan Camel (Prohibition of Slaughter and Regulation of Temporary Migration) Bill. However, Ilse Köhler-Rollefson, a prominent expert who has worked among Rajasthan camel breeders and herders, points out that “this does not provide a solution to the key issues behind the crisis”.<br /> <br /> Please <a href="http://www.governancenow.com/news/regular-story/battle-over-cattle">click here</a> to read more. <br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'GovernanceNow.com, 21 June, 2017, http://www.governancenow.com/news/regular-story/battle-over-cattle', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'battle-over-cattle-himanshu-upadhyaya-4682228', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4682228, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 34126, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Battle over cattle -Himanshu Upadhyaya', 'metaKeywords' => 'Cow Protection,Cow Slaughter,Cattle breeding,Cattle slaughter,Cattle Trade', 'metaDesc' => ' -GovernanceNow.com Banning cattle slaughter, like demonetisation, may deliver political gains but will hit the rural economy hard More than a century ago, a team of officials from Brazil toured some villages of Kheda district, in central Gujarat. They had come to procure...', 'disp' => '<div align="justify">-GovernanceNow.com<br /><br /><em>Banning cattle slaughter, like demonetisation, may deliver political gains but will hit the rural economy hard<br /></em><br />More than a century ago, a team of officials from Brazil toured some villages of Kheda district, in central Gujarat. They had come to procure breeding bulls of the famous Kankreji breed, notes Bhailal Patel, a charismatic institution-builder who was also the first leader of opposition in Gujarat assembly, in his memoirs. It was of course a different India the Brazilians encountered. Cattle in those days were sold and procured without the paperwork to prove that the purchase was being made for purposes other than slaughter. It was a time when nutritionists had started calling milk a complete food and it was creating a niche in the food basket of people.</div><div align="justify"><br />Not that there were no animal rights activists around then and prevention of cruelty against animals was an unheard-of phrase. On the contrary, there were several of them – the first Society for Prevention of Cruelty against Animals was founded in Calcutta in 1861 by Colesworthey Grant, and there exists a memorial for her in front of Writers’ Building – but they lobbied the government for ensuring the welfare of animals without the nefarious intent of interfering with people’s dietary choices or imposing vigilante ideas on minorities that derive their livelihoods from livestock.<br /> <br />If one looks carefully in the archives, even as a cow protection movement took roots in north India, livestock experts within the British establishment and commissariat were debating questions such as ‘What good does a cattle show do in India?’ They considered whether to impose an embargo on the export of live animals of certain breeds of cattle or not. The Indian branch of the Humanitarian League started publishing several documents that focused on vegetarianism and cow protection. However, the drumming up of hysteria around cattle slaughter and vigilantism had not surfaced without sane voices articulating checks – be it Ram Mohan Roy writing in defence of beef-eating or MK Gandhi articulating a non-fanatic version of championing the cause of the cow in his Hind Swaraj.<br /> <br />On May 23 this year, the ministry of environment issued ‘Rules on prevention of cruelty to animals (regulation of livestock market)’ with the purported aim of regulating animal markets. When one reads the rules – notwithstanding the lame efforts from union ministers to issue clarifications – one is left with the feeling that these are drafted by overzealous persons with misplaced notions of what constitutes the welfare of livestock and livestock owners.<br /> <br />Clause 22 has been the one that has come under close scrutiny, and not without reason. With a single stroke of the pen, it seeks to restructure all the animal markets in the country where animals are to be traded exclusively for “agricultural purposes” and not for slaughter. Notwithstanding finance minister Arun Jaitley’s clarifications, please read clause 22 along with the clause 2 (b), which contains a very expansive definition of what all places are construed as ‘animal market’ – it even includes “any lairage [that is, where cattle may be rested on the way to a slaughterhouse] adjoining a market or a slaughterhouse”!<br /> <br />The overzealousness is also visible when one read clause 2 (e) that states, “cattle means a bovine animal including bulls, bullocks, cows, buffalos, steers, heifers and calves and includes camels” (emphasis added). The inspiration for making sure that all these animals that clause 2 (e) defines as cattle must be traded at animal market exclusively for ‘agricultural purposes’ is said to have its origins in the directive principles of the Indian constitution. The deceit becomes obvious when one reads the directive principle and finds no mention of buffalo and camel there. <br /> <br />So, why were camels and buffaloes added in the definition of cattle? The camel population of India is concentrated in Rajasthan and one district of Gujarat. Camels are critically endangered in parts of Jammu and Kashmir. Their numbers have been declining: there were 10 lakh head in 1992, but the number shrunk to 4 lakh in 2012. In 2014, Rajasthan declared camel the “state animal” and a year later promulgated the Rajasthan Camel (Prohibition of Slaughter and Regulation of Temporary Migration) Bill. However, Ilse Köhler-Rollefson, a prominent expert who has worked among Rajasthan camel breeders and herders, points out that “this does not provide a solution to the key issues behind the crisis”.<br /><br />Please <a href="http://www.governancenow.com/news/regular-story/battle-over-cattle" title="http://www.governancenow.com/news/regular-story/battle-over-cattle">click here</a> to read more. <br /><br /></div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 34126, 'title' => 'Battle over cattle -Himanshu Upadhyaya', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div align="justify"> -GovernanceNow.com<br /> <br /> <em>Banning cattle slaughter, like demonetisation, may deliver political gains but will hit the rural economy hard<br /> </em><br /> More than a century ago, a team of officials from Brazil toured some villages of Kheda district, in central Gujarat. They had come to procure breeding bulls of the famous Kankreji breed, notes Bhailal Patel, a charismatic institution-builder who was also the first leader of opposition in Gujarat assembly, in his memoirs. It was of course a different India the Brazilians encountered. Cattle in those days were sold and procured without the paperwork to prove that the purchase was being made for purposes other than slaughter. It was a time when nutritionists had started calling milk a complete food and it was creating a niche in the food basket of people. </div> <div align="justify"> <br /> Not that there were no animal rights activists around then and prevention of cruelty against animals was an unheard-of phrase. On the contrary, there were several of them – the first Society for Prevention of Cruelty against Animals was founded in Calcutta in 1861 by Colesworthey Grant, and there exists a memorial for her in front of Writers’ Building – but they lobbied the government for ensuring the welfare of animals without the nefarious intent of interfering with people’s dietary choices or imposing vigilante ideas on minorities that derive their livelihoods from livestock.<br /> <br /> If one looks carefully in the archives, even as a cow protection movement took roots in north India, livestock experts within the British establishment and commissariat were debating questions such as ‘What good does a cattle show do in India?’ They considered whether to impose an embargo on the export of live animals of certain breeds of cattle or not. The Indian branch of the Humanitarian League started publishing several documents that focused on vegetarianism and cow protection. However, the drumming up of hysteria around cattle slaughter and vigilantism had not surfaced without sane voices articulating checks – be it Ram Mohan Roy writing in defence of beef-eating or MK Gandhi articulating a non-fanatic version of championing the cause of the cow in his Hind Swaraj.<br /> <br /> On May 23 this year, the ministry of environment issued ‘Rules on prevention of cruelty to animals (regulation of livestock market)’ with the purported aim of regulating animal markets. When one reads the rules – notwithstanding the lame efforts from union ministers to issue clarifications – one is left with the feeling that these are drafted by overzealous persons with misplaced notions of what constitutes the welfare of livestock and livestock owners.<br /> <br /> Clause 22 has been the one that has come under close scrutiny, and not without reason. With a single stroke of the pen, it seeks to restructure all the animal markets in the country where animals are to be traded exclusively for “agricultural purposes” and not for slaughter. Notwithstanding finance minister Arun Jaitley’s clarifications, please read clause 22 along with the clause 2 (b), which contains a very expansive definition of what all places are construed as ‘animal market’ – it even includes “any lairage [that is, where cattle may be rested on the way to a slaughterhouse] adjoining a market or a slaughterhouse”!<br /> <br /> The overzealousness is also visible when one read clause 2 (e) that states, “cattle means a bovine animal including bulls, bullocks, cows, buffalos, steers, heifers and calves and includes camels” (emphasis added). The inspiration for making sure that all these animals that clause 2 (e) defines as cattle must be traded at animal market exclusively for ‘agricultural purposes’ is said to have its origins in the directive principles of the Indian constitution. The deceit becomes obvious when one reads the directive principle and finds no mention of buffalo and camel there. <br /> <br /> So, why were camels and buffaloes added in the definition of cattle? The camel population of India is concentrated in Rajasthan and one district of Gujarat. Camels are critically endangered in parts of Jammu and Kashmir. Their numbers have been declining: there were 10 lakh head in 1992, but the number shrunk to 4 lakh in 2012. In 2014, Rajasthan declared camel the “state animal” and a year later promulgated the Rajasthan Camel (Prohibition of Slaughter and Regulation of Temporary Migration) Bill. However, Ilse Köhler-Rollefson, a prominent expert who has worked among Rajasthan camel breeders and herders, points out that “this does not provide a solution to the key issues behind the crisis”.<br /> <br /> Please <a href="http://www.governancenow.com/news/regular-story/battle-over-cattle">click here</a> to read more. <br /> <br /> </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'GovernanceNow.com, 21 June, 2017, http://www.governancenow.com/news/regular-story/battle-over-cattle', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'battle-over-cattle-himanshu-upadhyaya-4682228', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4682228, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 34126 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Battle over cattle -Himanshu Upadhyaya' $metaKeywords = 'Cow Protection,Cow Slaughter,Cattle breeding,Cattle slaughter,Cattle Trade' $metaDesc = ' -GovernanceNow.com Banning cattle slaughter, like demonetisation, may deliver political gains but will hit the rural economy hard More than a century ago, a team of officials from Brazil toured some villages of Kheda district, in central Gujarat. They had come to procure...' $disp = '<div align="justify">-GovernanceNow.com<br /><br /><em>Banning cattle slaughter, like demonetisation, may deliver political gains but will hit the rural economy hard<br /></em><br />More than a century ago, a team of officials from Brazil toured some villages of Kheda district, in central Gujarat. They had come to procure breeding bulls of the famous Kankreji breed, notes Bhailal Patel, a charismatic institution-builder who was also the first leader of opposition in Gujarat assembly, in his memoirs. It was of course a different India the Brazilians encountered. Cattle in those days were sold and procured without the paperwork to prove that the purchase was being made for purposes other than slaughter. It was a time when nutritionists had started calling milk a complete food and it was creating a niche in the food basket of people.</div><div align="justify"><br />Not that there were no animal rights activists around then and prevention of cruelty against animals was an unheard-of phrase. On the contrary, there were several of them – the first Society for Prevention of Cruelty against Animals was founded in Calcutta in 1861 by Colesworthey Grant, and there exists a memorial for her in front of Writers’ Building – but they lobbied the government for ensuring the welfare of animals without the nefarious intent of interfering with people’s dietary choices or imposing vigilante ideas on minorities that derive their livelihoods from livestock.<br /> <br />If one looks carefully in the archives, even as a cow protection movement took roots in north India, livestock experts within the British establishment and commissariat were debating questions such as ‘What good does a cattle show do in India?’ They considered whether to impose an embargo on the export of live animals of certain breeds of cattle or not. The Indian branch of the Humanitarian League started publishing several documents that focused on vegetarianism and cow protection. However, the drumming up of hysteria around cattle slaughter and vigilantism had not surfaced without sane voices articulating checks – be it Ram Mohan Roy writing in defence of beef-eating or MK Gandhi articulating a non-fanatic version of championing the cause of the cow in his Hind Swaraj.<br /> <br />On May 23 this year, the ministry of environment issued ‘Rules on prevention of cruelty to animals (regulation of livestock market)’ with the purported aim of regulating animal markets. When one reads the rules – notwithstanding the lame efforts from union ministers to issue clarifications – one is left with the feeling that these are drafted by overzealous persons with misplaced notions of what constitutes the welfare of livestock and livestock owners.<br /> <br />Clause 22 has been the one that has come under close scrutiny, and not without reason. With a single stroke of the pen, it seeks to restructure all the animal markets in the country where animals are to be traded exclusively for “agricultural purposes” and not for slaughter. Notwithstanding finance minister Arun Jaitley’s clarifications, please read clause 22 along with the clause 2 (b), which contains a very expansive definition of what all places are construed as ‘animal market’ – it even includes “any lairage [that is, where cattle may be rested on the way to a slaughterhouse] adjoining a market or a slaughterhouse”!<br /> <br />The overzealousness is also visible when one read clause 2 (e) that states, “cattle means a bovine animal including bulls, bullocks, cows, buffalos, steers, heifers and calves and includes camels” (emphasis added). The inspiration for making sure that all these animals that clause 2 (e) defines as cattle must be traded at animal market exclusively for ‘agricultural purposes’ is said to have its origins in the directive principles of the Indian constitution. The deceit becomes obvious when one reads the directive principle and finds no mention of buffalo and camel there. <br /> <br />So, why were camels and buffaloes added in the definition of cattle? The camel population of India is concentrated in Rajasthan and one district of Gujarat. Camels are critically endangered in parts of Jammu and Kashmir. Their numbers have been declining: there were 10 lakh head in 1992, but the number shrunk to 4 lakh in 2012. In 2014, Rajasthan declared camel the “state animal” and a year later promulgated the Rajasthan Camel (Prohibition of Slaughter and Regulation of Temporary Migration) Bill. However, Ilse Köhler-Rollefson, a prominent expert who has worked among Rajasthan camel breeders and herders, points out that “this does not provide a solution to the key issues behind the crisis”.<br /><br />Please <a href="http://www.governancenow.com/news/regular-story/battle-over-cattle" title="http://www.governancenow.com/news/regular-story/battle-over-cattle">click here</a> to read more. <br /><br /></div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Battle over cattle -Himanshu Upadhyaya |
-GovernanceNow.com Banning cattle slaughter, like demonetisation, may deliver political gains but will hit the rural economy hard More than a century ago, a team of officials from Brazil toured some villages of Kheda district, in central Gujarat. They had come to procure breeding bulls of the famous Kankreji breed, notes Bhailal Patel, a charismatic institution-builder who was also the first leader of opposition in Gujarat assembly, in his memoirs. It was of course a different India the Brazilians encountered. Cattle in those days were sold and procured without the paperwork to prove that the purchase was being made for purposes other than slaughter. It was a time when nutritionists had started calling milk a complete food and it was creating a niche in the food basket of people. Not that there were no animal rights activists around then and prevention of cruelty against animals was an unheard-of phrase. On the contrary, there were several of them – the first Society for Prevention of Cruelty against Animals was founded in Calcutta in 1861 by Colesworthey Grant, and there exists a memorial for her in front of Writers’ Building – but they lobbied the government for ensuring the welfare of animals without the nefarious intent of interfering with people’s dietary choices or imposing vigilante ideas on minorities that derive their livelihoods from livestock. If one looks carefully in the archives, even as a cow protection movement took roots in north India, livestock experts within the British establishment and commissariat were debating questions such as ‘What good does a cattle show do in India?’ They considered whether to impose an embargo on the export of live animals of certain breeds of cattle or not. The Indian branch of the Humanitarian League started publishing several documents that focused on vegetarianism and cow protection. However, the drumming up of hysteria around cattle slaughter and vigilantism had not surfaced without sane voices articulating checks – be it Ram Mohan Roy writing in defence of beef-eating or MK Gandhi articulating a non-fanatic version of championing the cause of the cow in his Hind Swaraj. On May 23 this year, the ministry of environment issued ‘Rules on prevention of cruelty to animals (regulation of livestock market)’ with the purported aim of regulating animal markets. When one reads the rules – notwithstanding the lame efforts from union ministers to issue clarifications – one is left with the feeling that these are drafted by overzealous persons with misplaced notions of what constitutes the welfare of livestock and livestock owners. Clause 22 has been the one that has come under close scrutiny, and not without reason. With a single stroke of the pen, it seeks to restructure all the animal markets in the country where animals are to be traded exclusively for “agricultural purposes” and not for slaughter. Notwithstanding finance minister Arun Jaitley’s clarifications, please read clause 22 along with the clause 2 (b), which contains a very expansive definition of what all places are construed as ‘animal market’ – it even includes “any lairage [that is, where cattle may be rested on the way to a slaughterhouse] adjoining a market or a slaughterhouse”! The overzealousness is also visible when one read clause 2 (e) that states, “cattle means a bovine animal including bulls, bullocks, cows, buffalos, steers, heifers and calves and includes camels” (emphasis added). The inspiration for making sure that all these animals that clause 2 (e) defines as cattle must be traded at animal market exclusively for ‘agricultural purposes’ is said to have its origins in the directive principles of the Indian constitution. The deceit becomes obvious when one reads the directive principle and finds no mention of buffalo and camel there. So, why were camels and buffaloes added in the definition of cattle? The camel population of India is concentrated in Rajasthan and one district of Gujarat. Camels are critically endangered in parts of Jammu and Kashmir. Their numbers have been declining: there were 10 lakh head in 1992, but the number shrunk to 4 lakh in 2012. In 2014, Rajasthan declared camel the “state animal” and a year later promulgated the Rajasthan Camel (Prohibition of Slaughter and Regulation of Temporary Migration) Bill. However, Ilse Köhler-Rollefson, a prominent expert who has worked among Rajasthan camel breeders and herders, points out that “this does not provide a solution to the key issues behind the crisis”. Please click here to read more. |