Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/behind-the-curve-4252/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/behind-the-curve-4252/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/behind-the-curve-4252/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/behind-the-curve-4252/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6813330ad4f62-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6813330ad4f62-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6813330ad4f62-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6813330ad4f62-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6813330ad4f62-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6813330ad4f62-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6813330ad4f62-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6813330ad4f62-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6813330ad4f62-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 4162,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Behind the curve&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;In the first week of September, two things happened in western Uttar Pradesh. The first is that a township that was supposed to be constructed in Aligarh district as part of the Yamuna Expressway project was scrapped. The second was that the UP government announced a revised compensation scheme for the acquisition of land. And now, more than two months later, that bears fruit: the township is back on, and the local farmers who are selling their land will benefit from the new policy. This is a reminder of the fact that the resistance to land acquisition across India is not necessarily a resistance to the idea of losing land; it is to the perception that the process available to, and the compensation offered to, those selling land is haphazard and unfair.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;The UP government figured this out well ahead of the curve. It used the protests in August from some farmers affected by the Expressway as a political peg to move the compensation debate to a new level. The policy it announced had, for example, a yearly payment component, something Haryana, too, has tried with success. First of all, the base price would be settled through negotiation, not through fiat. Second, the farmer would be offered Rs 20,000 per acre for 33 years after acquisition (increased by Rs 600 per acre every year). The options wouldn&amp;rsquo;t stop there: they would also be able to access, if they preferred, a one-time payment of Rs 2.4 lakh per acre. Providing farmers with options and keeping the door to negotiations open, isn&amp;rsquo;t that what political solutions are about? The UP government certainly thought so, even as the other political players in Western UP took one badly-thought out position after another on the acquisition protests. Indeed, a day after Congress General Secretary Rahul Gandhi visited Aligarh to meet farmers, UP Chief Minister Mayawati released a statement saying that &amp;ldquo;those politicians who are busy undertaking trips to Aligarh with the obvious intent of politicising the issue, should ask the Central government to amend the archaic Land Acquisition Act of 1894, if they were truly interested in the well-being of farmers.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;A new land acquisition act is part of the agenda for this session of Parliament. The Trinamool Congress has previously blocked its discussion, but has nuanced that stance recently. The states, especially UP, are moving forward. The Centre must, too.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 11 November, 2010, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/behind-the-curve/709373/&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;behind-the-curve-4252&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4252,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4162,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Behind the curve&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Land Acquisition&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;In the first week of September, two things happened in western Uttar Pradesh. The first is that a township that was supposed to be constructed in Aligarh district as part of the Yamuna Expressway project was scrapped. The second was...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;In the first week of September, two things happened in western Uttar Pradesh. The first is that a township that was supposed to be constructed in Aligarh district as part of the Yamuna Expressway project was scrapped. The second was that the UP government announced a revised compensation scheme for the acquisition of land. And now, more than two months later, that bears fruit: the township is back on, and the local farmers who are selling their land will benefit from the new policy. This is a reminder of the fact that the resistance to land acquisition across India is not necessarily a resistance to the idea of losing land; it is to the perception that the process available to, and the compensation offered to, those selling land is haphazard and unfair.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;The UP government figured this out well ahead of the curve. It used the protests in August from some farmers affected by the Expressway as a political peg to move the compensation debate to a new level. The policy it announced had, for example, a yearly payment component, something Haryana, too, has tried with success. First of all, the base price would be settled through negotiation, not through fiat. Second, the farmer would be offered Rs 20,000 per acre for 33 years after acquisition (increased by Rs 600 per acre every year). The options wouldn&amp;rsquo;t stop there: they would also be able to access, if they preferred, a one-time payment of Rs 2.4 lakh per acre. Providing farmers with options and keeping the door to negotiations open, isn&amp;rsquo;t that what political solutions are about? The UP government certainly thought so, even as the other political players in Western UP took one badly-thought out position after another on the acquisition protests. Indeed, a day after Congress General Secretary Rahul Gandhi visited Aligarh to meet farmers, UP Chief Minister Mayawati released a statement saying that &amp;ldquo;those politicians who are busy undertaking trips to Aligarh with the obvious intent of politicising the issue, should ask the Central government to amend the archaic Land Acquisition Act of 1894, if they were truly interested in the well-being of farmers.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;A new land acquisition act is part of the agenda for this session of Parliament. The Trinamool Congress has previously blocked its discussion, but has nuanced that stance recently. The states, especially UP, are moving forward. The Centre must, too.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 4162,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Behind the curve&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;In the first week of September, two things happened in western Uttar Pradesh. The first is that a township that was supposed to be constructed in Aligarh district as part of the Yamuna Expressway project was scrapped. The second was that the UP government announced a revised compensation scheme for the acquisition of land. And now, more than two months later, that bears fruit: the township is back on, and the local farmers who are selling their land will benefit from the new policy. This is a reminder of the fact that the resistance to land acquisition across India is not necessarily a resistance to the idea of losing land; it is to the perception that the process available to, and the compensation offered to, those selling land is haphazard and unfair.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;The UP government figured this out well ahead of the curve. It used the protests in August from some farmers affected by the Expressway as a political peg to move the compensation debate to a new level. The policy it announced had, for example, a yearly payment component, something Haryana, too, has tried with success. First of all, the base price would be settled through negotiation, not through fiat. Second, the farmer would be offered Rs 20,000 per acre for 33 years after acquisition (increased by Rs 600 per acre every year). The options wouldn&amp;rsquo;t stop there: they would also be able to access, if they preferred, a one-time payment of Rs 2.4 lakh per acre. Providing farmers with options and keeping the door to negotiations open, isn&amp;rsquo;t that what political solutions are about? The UP government certainly thought so, even as the other political players in Western UP took one badly-thought out position after another on the acquisition protests. Indeed, a day after Congress General Secretary Rahul Gandhi visited Aligarh to meet farmers, UP Chief Minister Mayawati released a statement saying that &amp;ldquo;those politicians who are busy undertaking trips to Aligarh with the obvious intent of politicising the issue, should ask the Central government to amend the archaic Land Acquisition Act of 1894, if they were truly interested in the well-being of farmers.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;A new land acquisition act is part of the agenda for this session of Parliament. The Trinamool Congress has previously blocked its discussion, but has nuanced that stance recently. The states, especially UP, are moving forward. The Centre must, too.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 11 November, 2010, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/behind-the-curve/709373/&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;behind-the-curve-4252&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4252,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 4162
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Behind the curve&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Land Acquisition&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;In the first week of September, two things happened in western Uttar Pradesh. The first is that a township that was supposed to be constructed in Aligarh district as part of the Yamuna Expressway project was scrapped. The second was...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;In the first week of September, two things happened in western Uttar Pradesh. The first is that a township that was supposed to be constructed in Aligarh district as part of the Yamuna Expressway project was scrapped. The second was that the UP government announced a revised compensation scheme for the acquisition of land. And now, more than two months later, that bears fruit: the township is back on, and the local farmers who are selling their land will benefit from the new policy. This is a reminder of the fact that the resistance to land acquisition across India is not necessarily a resistance to the idea of losing land; it is to the perception that the process available to, and the compensation offered to, those selling land is haphazard and unfair.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;The UP government figured this out well ahead of the curve. It used the protests in August from some farmers affected by the Expressway as a political peg to move the compensation debate to a new level. The policy it announced had, for example, a yearly payment component, something Haryana, too, has tried with success. First of all, the base price would be settled through negotiation, not through fiat. Second, the farmer would be offered Rs 20,000 per acre for 33 years after acquisition (increased by Rs 600 per acre every year). The options wouldn&amp;rsquo;t stop there: they would also be able to access, if they preferred, a one-time payment of Rs 2.4 lakh per acre. Providing farmers with options and keeping the door to negotiations open, isn&amp;rsquo;t that what political solutions are about? The UP government certainly thought so, even as the other political players in Western UP took one badly-thought out position after another on the acquisition protests. Indeed, a day after Congress General Secretary Rahul Gandhi visited Aligarh to meet farmers, UP Chief Minister Mayawati released a statement saying that &amp;ldquo;those politicians who are busy undertaking trips to Aligarh with the obvious intent of politicising the issue, should ask the Central government to amend the archaic Land Acquisition Act of 1894, if they were truly interested in the well-being of farmers.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;A new land acquisition act is part of the agenda for this session of Parliament. The Trinamool Congress has previously blocked its discussion, but has nuanced that stance recently. The states, especially UP, are moving forward. The Centre must, too.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/behind-the-curve-4252.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Behind the curve | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="In the first week of September, two things happened in western Uttar Pradesh. The first is that a township that was supposed to be constructed in Aligarh district as part of the Yamuna Expressway project was scrapped. The second was..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Behind the curve</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div style="text-align: justify"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium"><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><br /></font></span></div><div style="text-align: justify"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium"><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">In the first week of September, two things happened in western Uttar Pradesh. The first is that a township that was supposed to be constructed in Aligarh district as part of the Yamuna Expressway project was scrapped. The second was that the UP government announced a revised compensation scheme for the acquisition of land. And now, more than two months later, that bears fruit: the township is back on, and the local farmers who are selling their land will benefit from the new policy. This is a reminder of the fact that the resistance to land acquisition across India is not necessarily a resistance to the idea of losing land; it is to the perception that the process available to, and the compensation offered to, those selling land is haphazard and unfair.</font></span></div><div style="text-align: justify"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium"><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><br /></font></span></div><div style="text-align: justify"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium"><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">The UP government figured this out well ahead of the curve. It used the protests in August from some farmers affected by the Expressway as a political peg to move the compensation debate to a new level. The policy it announced had, for example, a yearly payment component, something Haryana, too, has tried with success. First of all, the base price would be settled through negotiation, not through fiat. Second, the farmer would be offered Rs 20,000 per acre for 33 years after acquisition (increased by Rs 600 per acre every year). The options wouldn&rsquo;t stop there: they would also be able to access, if they preferred, a one-time payment of Rs 2.4 lakh per acre. Providing farmers with options and keeping the door to negotiations open, isn&rsquo;t that what political solutions are about? The UP government certainly thought so, even as the other political players in Western UP took one badly-thought out position after another on the acquisition protests. Indeed, a day after Congress General Secretary Rahul Gandhi visited Aligarh to meet farmers, UP Chief Minister Mayawati released a statement saying that &ldquo;those politicians who are busy undertaking trips to Aligarh with the obvious intent of politicising the issue, should ask the Central government to amend the archaic Land Acquisition Act of 1894, if they were truly interested in the well-being of farmers.&rdquo;</font></span></div><div style="text-align: justify"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium"><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><br /></font></span></div><div style="text-align: justify"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium"><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">A new land acquisition act is part of the agenda for this session of Parliament. The Trinamool Congress has previously blocked its discussion, but has nuanced that stance recently. The states, especially UP, are moving forward. The Centre must, too.</font></span></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6813330ad4f62-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6813330ad4f62-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6813330ad4f62-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6813330ad4f62-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6813330ad4f62-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6813330ad4f62-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6813330ad4f62-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6813330ad4f62-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6813330ad4f62-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 4162,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Behind the curve&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;In the first week of September, two things happened in western Uttar Pradesh. The first is that a township that was supposed to be constructed in Aligarh district as part of the Yamuna Expressway project was scrapped. The second was that the UP government announced a revised compensation scheme for the acquisition of land. And now, more than two months later, that bears fruit: the township is back on, and the local farmers who are selling their land will benefit from the new policy. This is a reminder of the fact that the resistance to land acquisition across India is not necessarily a resistance to the idea of losing land; it is to the perception that the process available to, and the compensation offered to, those selling land is haphazard and unfair.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;The UP government figured this out well ahead of the curve. It used the protests in August from some farmers affected by the Expressway as a political peg to move the compensation debate to a new level. The policy it announced had, for example, a yearly payment component, something Haryana, too, has tried with success. First of all, the base price would be settled through negotiation, not through fiat. Second, the farmer would be offered Rs 20,000 per acre for 33 years after acquisition (increased by Rs 600 per acre every year). The options wouldn&amp;rsquo;t stop there: they would also be able to access, if they preferred, a one-time payment of Rs 2.4 lakh per acre. Providing farmers with options and keeping the door to negotiations open, isn&amp;rsquo;t that what political solutions are about? The UP government certainly thought so, even as the other political players in Western UP took one badly-thought out position after another on the acquisition protests. Indeed, a day after Congress General Secretary Rahul Gandhi visited Aligarh to meet farmers, UP Chief Minister Mayawati released a statement saying that &amp;ldquo;those politicians who are busy undertaking trips to Aligarh with the obvious intent of politicising the issue, should ask the Central government to amend the archaic Land Acquisition Act of 1894, if they were truly interested in the well-being of farmers.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;A new land acquisition act is part of the agenda for this session of Parliament. The Trinamool Congress has previously blocked its discussion, but has nuanced that stance recently. The states, especially UP, are moving forward. The Centre must, too.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 11 November, 2010, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/behind-the-curve/709373/&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;behind-the-curve-4252&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4252,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4162,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Behind the curve&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Land Acquisition&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;In the first week of September, two things happened in western Uttar Pradesh. The first is that a township that was supposed to be constructed in Aligarh district as part of the Yamuna Expressway project was scrapped. The second was...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;In the first week of September, two things happened in western Uttar Pradesh. The first is that a township that was supposed to be constructed in Aligarh district as part of the Yamuna Expressway project was scrapped. The second was that the UP government announced a revised compensation scheme for the acquisition of land. And now, more than two months later, that bears fruit: the township is back on, and the local farmers who are selling their land will benefit from the new policy. This is a reminder of the fact that the resistance to land acquisition across India is not necessarily a resistance to the idea of losing land; it is to the perception that the process available to, and the compensation offered to, those selling land is haphazard and unfair.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;The UP government figured this out well ahead of the curve. It used the protests in August from some farmers affected by the Expressway as a political peg to move the compensation debate to a new level. The policy it announced had, for example, a yearly payment component, something Haryana, too, has tried with success. First of all, the base price would be settled through negotiation, not through fiat. Second, the farmer would be offered Rs 20,000 per acre for 33 years after acquisition (increased by Rs 600 per acre every year). The options wouldn&amp;rsquo;t stop there: they would also be able to access, if they preferred, a one-time payment of Rs 2.4 lakh per acre. Providing farmers with options and keeping the door to negotiations open, isn&amp;rsquo;t that what political solutions are about? The UP government certainly thought so, even as the other political players in Western UP took one badly-thought out position after another on the acquisition protests. Indeed, a day after Congress General Secretary Rahul Gandhi visited Aligarh to meet farmers, UP Chief Minister Mayawati released a statement saying that &amp;ldquo;those politicians who are busy undertaking trips to Aligarh with the obvious intent of politicising the issue, should ask the Central government to amend the archaic Land Acquisition Act of 1894, if they were truly interested in the well-being of farmers.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;A new land acquisition act is part of the agenda for this session of Parliament. The Trinamool Congress has previously blocked its discussion, but has nuanced that stance recently. The states, especially UP, are moving forward. The Centre must, too.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 4162,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Behind the curve&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;In the first week of September, two things happened in western Uttar Pradesh. The first is that a township that was supposed to be constructed in Aligarh district as part of the Yamuna Expressway project was scrapped. The second was that the UP government announced a revised compensation scheme for the acquisition of land. And now, more than two months later, that bears fruit: the township is back on, and the local farmers who are selling their land will benefit from the new policy. This is a reminder of the fact that the resistance to land acquisition across India is not necessarily a resistance to the idea of losing land; it is to the perception that the process available to, and the compensation offered to, those selling land is haphazard and unfair.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;The UP government figured this out well ahead of the curve. It used the protests in August from some farmers affected by the Expressway as a political peg to move the compensation debate to a new level. The policy it announced had, for example, a yearly payment component, something Haryana, too, has tried with success. First of all, the base price would be settled through negotiation, not through fiat. Second, the farmer would be offered Rs 20,000 per acre for 33 years after acquisition (increased by Rs 600 per acre every year). The options wouldn&amp;rsquo;t stop there: they would also be able to access, if they preferred, a one-time payment of Rs 2.4 lakh per acre. Providing farmers with options and keeping the door to negotiations open, isn&amp;rsquo;t that what political solutions are about? The UP government certainly thought so, even as the other political players in Western UP took one badly-thought out position after another on the acquisition protests. Indeed, a day after Congress General Secretary Rahul Gandhi visited Aligarh to meet farmers, UP Chief Minister Mayawati released a statement saying that &amp;ldquo;those politicians who are busy undertaking trips to Aligarh with the obvious intent of politicising the issue, should ask the Central government to amend the archaic Land Acquisition Act of 1894, if they were truly interested in the well-being of farmers.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;A new land acquisition act is part of the agenda for this session of Parliament. The Trinamool Congress has previously blocked its discussion, but has nuanced that stance recently. The states, especially UP, are moving forward. The Centre must, too.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 11 November, 2010, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/behind-the-curve/709373/&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;behind-the-curve-4252&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4252,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 4162
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Behind the curve&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Land Acquisition&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;In the first week of September, two things happened in western Uttar Pradesh. The first is that a township that was supposed to be constructed in Aligarh district as part of the Yamuna Expressway project was scrapped. The second was...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;In the first week of September, two things happened in western Uttar Pradesh. The first is that a township that was supposed to be constructed in Aligarh district as part of the Yamuna Expressway project was scrapped. The second was that the UP government announced a revised compensation scheme for the acquisition of land. And now, more than two months later, that bears fruit: the township is back on, and the local farmers who are selling their land will benefit from the new policy. This is a reminder of the fact that the resistance to land acquisition across India is not necessarily a resistance to the idea of losing land; it is to the perception that the process available to, and the compensation offered to, those selling land is haphazard and unfair.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;The UP government figured this out well ahead of the curve. It used the protests in August from some farmers affected by the Expressway as a political peg to move the compensation debate to a new level. The policy it announced had, for example, a yearly payment component, something Haryana, too, has tried with success. First of all, the base price would be settled through negotiation, not through fiat. Second, the farmer would be offered Rs 20,000 per acre for 33 years after acquisition (increased by Rs 600 per acre every year). The options wouldn&amp;rsquo;t stop there: they would also be able to access, if they preferred, a one-time payment of Rs 2.4 lakh per acre. Providing farmers with options and keeping the door to negotiations open, isn&amp;rsquo;t that what political solutions are about? The UP government certainly thought so, even as the other political players in Western UP took one badly-thought out position after another on the acquisition protests. Indeed, a day after Congress General Secretary Rahul Gandhi visited Aligarh to meet farmers, UP Chief Minister Mayawati released a statement saying that &amp;ldquo;those politicians who are busy undertaking trips to Aligarh with the obvious intent of politicising the issue, should ask the Central government to amend the archaic Land Acquisition Act of 1894, if they were truly interested in the well-being of farmers.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;A new land acquisition act is part of the agenda for this session of Parliament. The Trinamool Congress has previously blocked its discussion, but has nuanced that stance recently. The states, especially UP, are moving forward. The Centre must, too.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/behind-the-curve-4252.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Behind the curve | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="In the first week of September, two things happened in western Uttar Pradesh. The first is that a township that was supposed to be constructed in Aligarh district as part of the Yamuna Expressway project was scrapped. The second was..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Behind the curve</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div style="text-align: justify"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium"><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><br /></font></span></div><div style="text-align: justify"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium"><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">In the first week of September, two things happened in western Uttar Pradesh. The first is that a township that was supposed to be constructed in Aligarh district as part of the Yamuna Expressway project was scrapped. The second was that the UP government announced a revised compensation scheme for the acquisition of land. And now, more than two months later, that bears fruit: the township is back on, and the local farmers who are selling their land will benefit from the new policy. This is a reminder of the fact that the resistance to land acquisition across India is not necessarily a resistance to the idea of losing land; it is to the perception that the process available to, and the compensation offered to, those selling land is haphazard and unfair.</font></span></div><div style="text-align: justify"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium"><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><br /></font></span></div><div style="text-align: justify"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium"><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">The UP government figured this out well ahead of the curve. It used the protests in August from some farmers affected by the Expressway as a political peg to move the compensation debate to a new level. The policy it announced had, for example, a yearly payment component, something Haryana, too, has tried with success. First of all, the base price would be settled through negotiation, not through fiat. Second, the farmer would be offered Rs 20,000 per acre for 33 years after acquisition (increased by Rs 600 per acre every year). The options wouldn&rsquo;t stop there: they would also be able to access, if they preferred, a one-time payment of Rs 2.4 lakh per acre. Providing farmers with options and keeping the door to negotiations open, isn&rsquo;t that what political solutions are about? The UP government certainly thought so, even as the other political players in Western UP took one badly-thought out position after another on the acquisition protests. Indeed, a day after Congress General Secretary Rahul Gandhi visited Aligarh to meet farmers, UP Chief Minister Mayawati released a statement saying that &ldquo;those politicians who are busy undertaking trips to Aligarh with the obvious intent of politicising the issue, should ask the Central government to amend the archaic Land Acquisition Act of 1894, if they were truly interested in the well-being of farmers.&rdquo;</font></span></div><div style="text-align: justify"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium"><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><br /></font></span></div><div style="text-align: justify"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium"><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">A new land acquisition act is part of the agenda for this session of Parliament. The Trinamool Congress has previously blocked its discussion, but has nuanced that stance recently. The states, especially UP, are moving forward. The Centre must, too.</font></span></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6813330ad4f62-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6813330ad4f62-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6813330ad4f62-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6813330ad4f62-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6813330ad4f62-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6813330ad4f62-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6813330ad4f62-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6813330ad4f62-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6813330ad4f62-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 4162,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Behind the curve&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;In the first week of September, two things happened in western Uttar Pradesh. The first is that a township that was supposed to be constructed in Aligarh district as part of the Yamuna Expressway project was scrapped. The second was that the UP government announced a revised compensation scheme for the acquisition of land. And now, more than two months later, that bears fruit: the township is back on, and the local farmers who are selling their land will benefit from the new policy. This is a reminder of the fact that the resistance to land acquisition across India is not necessarily a resistance to the idea of losing land; it is to the perception that the process available to, and the compensation offered to, those selling land is haphazard and unfair.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;The UP government figured this out well ahead of the curve. It used the protests in August from some farmers affected by the Expressway as a political peg to move the compensation debate to a new level. The policy it announced had, for example, a yearly payment component, something Haryana, too, has tried with success. First of all, the base price would be settled through negotiation, not through fiat. Second, the farmer would be offered Rs 20,000 per acre for 33 years after acquisition (increased by Rs 600 per acre every year). The options wouldn&amp;rsquo;t stop there: they would also be able to access, if they preferred, a one-time payment of Rs 2.4 lakh per acre. Providing farmers with options and keeping the door to negotiations open, isn&amp;rsquo;t that what political solutions are about? The UP government certainly thought so, even as the other political players in Western UP took one badly-thought out position after another on the acquisition protests. Indeed, a day after Congress General Secretary Rahul Gandhi visited Aligarh to meet farmers, UP Chief Minister Mayawati released a statement saying that &amp;ldquo;those politicians who are busy undertaking trips to Aligarh with the obvious intent of politicising the issue, should ask the Central government to amend the archaic Land Acquisition Act of 1894, if they were truly interested in the well-being of farmers.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;A new land acquisition act is part of the agenda for this session of Parliament. The Trinamool Congress has previously blocked its discussion, but has nuanced that stance recently. The states, especially UP, are moving forward. The Centre must, too.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 11 November, 2010, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/behind-the-curve/709373/&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;behind-the-curve-4252&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4252,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4162,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Behind the curve&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Land Acquisition&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;In the first week of September, two things happened in western Uttar Pradesh. The first is that a township that was supposed to be constructed in Aligarh district as part of the Yamuna Expressway project was scrapped. The second was...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;In the first week of September, two things happened in western Uttar Pradesh. The first is that a township that was supposed to be constructed in Aligarh district as part of the Yamuna Expressway project was scrapped. The second was that the UP government announced a revised compensation scheme for the acquisition of land. And now, more than two months later, that bears fruit: the township is back on, and the local farmers who are selling their land will benefit from the new policy. This is a reminder of the fact that the resistance to land acquisition across India is not necessarily a resistance to the idea of losing land; it is to the perception that the process available to, and the compensation offered to, those selling land is haphazard and unfair.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;The UP government figured this out well ahead of the curve. It used the protests in August from some farmers affected by the Expressway as a political peg to move the compensation debate to a new level. The policy it announced had, for example, a yearly payment component, something Haryana, too, has tried with success. First of all, the base price would be settled through negotiation, not through fiat. Second, the farmer would be offered Rs 20,000 per acre for 33 years after acquisition (increased by Rs 600 per acre every year). The options wouldn&amp;rsquo;t stop there: they would also be able to access, if they preferred, a one-time payment of Rs 2.4 lakh per acre. Providing farmers with options and keeping the door to negotiations open, isn&amp;rsquo;t that what political solutions are about? The UP government certainly thought so, even as the other political players in Western UP took one badly-thought out position after another on the acquisition protests. Indeed, a day after Congress General Secretary Rahul Gandhi visited Aligarh to meet farmers, UP Chief Minister Mayawati released a statement saying that &amp;ldquo;those politicians who are busy undertaking trips to Aligarh with the obvious intent of politicising the issue, should ask the Central government to amend the archaic Land Acquisition Act of 1894, if they were truly interested in the well-being of farmers.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;A new land acquisition act is part of the agenda for this session of Parliament. The Trinamool Congress has previously blocked its discussion, but has nuanced that stance recently. The states, especially UP, are moving forward. The Centre must, too.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 4162,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Behind the curve&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;In the first week of September, two things happened in western Uttar Pradesh. The first is that a township that was supposed to be constructed in Aligarh district as part of the Yamuna Expressway project was scrapped. The second was that the UP government announced a revised compensation scheme for the acquisition of land. And now, more than two months later, that bears fruit: the township is back on, and the local farmers who are selling their land will benefit from the new policy. This is a reminder of the fact that the resistance to land acquisition across India is not necessarily a resistance to the idea of losing land; it is to the perception that the process available to, and the compensation offered to, those selling land is haphazard and unfair.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;The UP government figured this out well ahead of the curve. It used the protests in August from some farmers affected by the Expressway as a political peg to move the compensation debate to a new level. The policy it announced had, for example, a yearly payment component, something Haryana, too, has tried with success. First of all, the base price would be settled through negotiation, not through fiat. Second, the farmer would be offered Rs 20,000 per acre for 33 years after acquisition (increased by Rs 600 per acre every year). The options wouldn&amp;rsquo;t stop there: they would also be able to access, if they preferred, a one-time payment of Rs 2.4 lakh per acre. Providing farmers with options and keeping the door to negotiations open, isn&amp;rsquo;t that what political solutions are about? The UP government certainly thought so, even as the other political players in Western UP took one badly-thought out position after another on the acquisition protests. Indeed, a day after Congress General Secretary Rahul Gandhi visited Aligarh to meet farmers, UP Chief Minister Mayawati released a statement saying that &amp;ldquo;those politicians who are busy undertaking trips to Aligarh with the obvious intent of politicising the issue, should ask the Central government to amend the archaic Land Acquisition Act of 1894, if they were truly interested in the well-being of farmers.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;A new land acquisition act is part of the agenda for this session of Parliament. The Trinamool Congress has previously blocked its discussion, but has nuanced that stance recently. The states, especially UP, are moving forward. The Centre must, too.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 11 November, 2010, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/behind-the-curve/709373/&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;behind-the-curve-4252&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4252,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 4162
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Behind the curve&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Land Acquisition&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;In the first week of September, two things happened in western Uttar Pradesh. The first is that a township that was supposed to be constructed in Aligarh district as part of the Yamuna Expressway project was scrapped. The second was...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;In the first week of September, two things happened in western Uttar Pradesh. The first is that a township that was supposed to be constructed in Aligarh district as part of the Yamuna Expressway project was scrapped. The second was that the UP government announced a revised compensation scheme for the acquisition of land. And now, more than two months later, that bears fruit: the township is back on, and the local farmers who are selling their land will benefit from the new policy. This is a reminder of the fact that the resistance to land acquisition across India is not necessarily a resistance to the idea of losing land; it is to the perception that the process available to, and the compensation offered to, those selling land is haphazard and unfair.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;The UP government figured this out well ahead of the curve. It used the protests in August from some farmers affected by the Expressway as a political peg to move the compensation debate to a new level. The policy it announced had, for example, a yearly payment component, something Haryana, too, has tried with success. First of all, the base price would be settled through negotiation, not through fiat. Second, the farmer would be offered Rs 20,000 per acre for 33 years after acquisition (increased by Rs 600 per acre every year). The options wouldn&amp;rsquo;t stop there: they would also be able to access, if they preferred, a one-time payment of Rs 2.4 lakh per acre. Providing farmers with options and keeping the door to negotiations open, isn&amp;rsquo;t that what political solutions are about? The UP government certainly thought so, even as the other political players in Western UP took one badly-thought out position after another on the acquisition protests. Indeed, a day after Congress General Secretary Rahul Gandhi visited Aligarh to meet farmers, UP Chief Minister Mayawati released a statement saying that &amp;ldquo;those politicians who are busy undertaking trips to Aligarh with the obvious intent of politicising the issue, should ask the Central government to amend the archaic Land Acquisition Act of 1894, if they were truly interested in the well-being of farmers.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-size: medium&quot;&gt;&lt;font face=&quot;arial, helvetica, sans-serif&quot;&gt;A new land acquisition act is part of the agenda for this session of Parliament. The Trinamool Congress has previously blocked its discussion, but has nuanced that stance recently. The states, especially UP, are moving forward. The Centre must, too.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/behind-the-curve-4252.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Behind the curve | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="In the first week of September, two things happened in western Uttar Pradesh. The first is that a township that was supposed to be constructed in Aligarh district as part of the Yamuna Expressway project was scrapped. The second was..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Behind the curve</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div style="text-align: justify"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium"><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><br /></font></span></div><div style="text-align: justify"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium"><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">In the first week of September, two things happened in western Uttar Pradesh. The first is that a township that was supposed to be constructed in Aligarh district as part of the Yamuna Expressway project was scrapped. The second was that the UP government announced a revised compensation scheme for the acquisition of land. And now, more than two months later, that bears fruit: the township is back on, and the local farmers who are selling their land will benefit from the new policy. This is a reminder of the fact that the resistance to land acquisition across India is not necessarily a resistance to the idea of losing land; it is to the perception that the process available to, and the compensation offered to, those selling land is haphazard and unfair.</font></span></div><div style="text-align: justify"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium"><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><br /></font></span></div><div style="text-align: justify"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium"><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">The UP government figured this out well ahead of the curve. It used the protests in August from some farmers affected by the Expressway as a political peg to move the compensation debate to a new level. The policy it announced had, for example, a yearly payment component, something Haryana, too, has tried with success. First of all, the base price would be settled through negotiation, not through fiat. Second, the farmer would be offered Rs 20,000 per acre for 33 years after acquisition (increased by Rs 600 per acre every year). The options wouldn&rsquo;t stop there: they would also be able to access, if they preferred, a one-time payment of Rs 2.4 lakh per acre. Providing farmers with options and keeping the door to negotiations open, isn&rsquo;t that what political solutions are about? The UP government certainly thought so, even as the other political players in Western UP took one badly-thought out position after another on the acquisition protests. Indeed, a day after Congress General Secretary Rahul Gandhi visited Aligarh to meet farmers, UP Chief Minister Mayawati released a statement saying that &ldquo;those politicians who are busy undertaking trips to Aligarh with the obvious intent of politicising the issue, should ask the Central government to amend the archaic Land Acquisition Act of 1894, if they were truly interested in the well-being of farmers.&rdquo;</font></span></div><div style="text-align: justify"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium"><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><br /></font></span></div><div style="text-align: justify"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium"><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">A new land acquisition act is part of the agenda for this session of Parliament. The Trinamool Congress has previously blocked its discussion, but has nuanced that stance recently. The states, especially UP, are moving forward. The Centre must, too.</font></span></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 4162,
		'title' => 'Behind the curve',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium"><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><br /></font></span></div><div style="text-align: justify"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium"><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">In the first week of September, two things happened in western Uttar Pradesh. The first is that a township that was supposed to be constructed in Aligarh district as part of the Yamuna Expressway project was scrapped. The second was that the UP government announced a revised compensation scheme for the acquisition of land. And now, more than two months later, that bears fruit: the township is back on, and the local farmers who are selling their land will benefit from the new policy. This is a reminder of the fact that the resistance to land acquisition across India is not necessarily a resistance to the idea of losing land; it is to the perception that the process available to, and the compensation offered to, those selling land is haphazard and unfair.</font></span></div><div style="text-align: justify"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium"><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><br /></font></span></div><div style="text-align: justify"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium"><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">The UP government figured this out well ahead of the curve. It used the protests in August from some farmers affected by the Expressway as a political peg to move the compensation debate to a new level. The policy it announced had, for example, a yearly payment component, something Haryana, too, has tried with success. First of all, the base price would be settled through negotiation, not through fiat. Second, the farmer would be offered Rs 20,000 per acre for 33 years after acquisition (increased by Rs 600 per acre every year). The options wouldn&rsquo;t stop there: they would also be able to access, if they preferred, a one-time payment of Rs 2.4 lakh per acre. Providing farmers with options and keeping the door to negotiations open, isn&rsquo;t that what political solutions are about? The UP government certainly thought so, even as the other political players in Western UP took one badly-thought out position after another on the acquisition protests. Indeed, a day after Congress General Secretary Rahul Gandhi visited Aligarh to meet farmers, UP Chief Minister Mayawati released a statement saying that &ldquo;those politicians who are busy undertaking trips to Aligarh with the obvious intent of politicising the issue, should ask the Central government to amend the archaic Land Acquisition Act of 1894, if they were truly interested in the well-being of farmers.&rdquo;</font></span></div><div style="text-align: justify"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium"><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><br /></font></span></div><div style="text-align: justify"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium"><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">A new land acquisition act is part of the agenda for this session of Parliament. The Trinamool Congress has previously blocked its discussion, but has nuanced that stance recently. The states, especially UP, are moving forward. The Centre must, too.</font></span></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 11 November, 2010, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/behind-the-curve/709373/',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'behind-the-curve-4252',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 4252,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 4162,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Behind the curve',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Land Acquisition',
	'metaDesc' => 'In the first week of September, two things happened in western Uttar Pradesh. The first is that a township that was supposed to be constructed in Aligarh district as part of the Yamuna Expressway project was scrapped. The second was...',
	'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium"><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><br /></font></span></div><div style="text-align: justify"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium"><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">In the first week of September, two things happened in western Uttar Pradesh. The first is that a township that was supposed to be constructed in Aligarh district as part of the Yamuna Expressway project was scrapped. The second was that the UP government announced a revised compensation scheme for the acquisition of land. And now, more than two months later, that bears fruit: the township is back on, and the local farmers who are selling their land will benefit from the new policy. This is a reminder of the fact that the resistance to land acquisition across India is not necessarily a resistance to the idea of losing land; it is to the perception that the process available to, and the compensation offered to, those selling land is haphazard and unfair.</font></span></div><div style="text-align: justify"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium"><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><br /></font></span></div><div style="text-align: justify"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium"><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">The UP government figured this out well ahead of the curve. It used the protests in August from some farmers affected by the Expressway as a political peg to move the compensation debate to a new level. The policy it announced had, for example, a yearly payment component, something Haryana, too, has tried with success. First of all, the base price would be settled through negotiation, not through fiat. Second, the farmer would be offered Rs 20,000 per acre for 33 years after acquisition (increased by Rs 600 per acre every year). The options wouldn&rsquo;t stop there: they would also be able to access, if they preferred, a one-time payment of Rs 2.4 lakh per acre. Providing farmers with options and keeping the door to negotiations open, isn&rsquo;t that what political solutions are about? The UP government certainly thought so, even as the other political players in Western UP took one badly-thought out position after another on the acquisition protests. Indeed, a day after Congress General Secretary Rahul Gandhi visited Aligarh to meet farmers, UP Chief Minister Mayawati released a statement saying that &ldquo;those politicians who are busy undertaking trips to Aligarh with the obvious intent of politicising the issue, should ask the Central government to amend the archaic Land Acquisition Act of 1894, if they were truly interested in the well-being of farmers.&rdquo;</font></span></div><div style="text-align: justify"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium"><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><br /></font></span></div><div style="text-align: justify"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium"><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">A new land acquisition act is part of the agenda for this session of Parliament. The Trinamool Congress has previously blocked its discussion, but has nuanced that stance recently. The states, especially UP, are moving forward. The Centre must, too.</font></span></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 4162,
	'title' => 'Behind the curve',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium"><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><br /></font></span></div><div style="text-align: justify"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium"><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">In the first week of September, two things happened in western Uttar Pradesh. The first is that a township that was supposed to be constructed in Aligarh district as part of the Yamuna Expressway project was scrapped. The second was that the UP government announced a revised compensation scheme for the acquisition of land. And now, more than two months later, that bears fruit: the township is back on, and the local farmers who are selling their land will benefit from the new policy. This is a reminder of the fact that the resistance to land acquisition across India is not necessarily a resistance to the idea of losing land; it is to the perception that the process available to, and the compensation offered to, those selling land is haphazard and unfair.</font></span></div><div style="text-align: justify"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium"><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><br /></font></span></div><div style="text-align: justify"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium"><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">The UP government figured this out well ahead of the curve. It used the protests in August from some farmers affected by the Expressway as a political peg to move the compensation debate to a new level. The policy it announced had, for example, a yearly payment component, something Haryana, too, has tried with success. First of all, the base price would be settled through negotiation, not through fiat. Second, the farmer would be offered Rs 20,000 per acre for 33 years after acquisition (increased by Rs 600 per acre every year). The options wouldn&rsquo;t stop there: they would also be able to access, if they preferred, a one-time payment of Rs 2.4 lakh per acre. Providing farmers with options and keeping the door to negotiations open, isn&rsquo;t that what political solutions are about? The UP government certainly thought so, even as the other political players in Western UP took one badly-thought out position after another on the acquisition protests. Indeed, a day after Congress General Secretary Rahul Gandhi visited Aligarh to meet farmers, UP Chief Minister Mayawati released a statement saying that &ldquo;those politicians who are busy undertaking trips to Aligarh with the obvious intent of politicising the issue, should ask the Central government to amend the archaic Land Acquisition Act of 1894, if they were truly interested in the well-being of farmers.&rdquo;</font></span></div><div style="text-align: justify"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium"><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><br /></font></span></div><div style="text-align: justify"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium"><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">A new land acquisition act is part of the agenda for this session of Parliament. The Trinamool Congress has previously blocked its discussion, but has nuanced that stance recently. The states, especially UP, are moving forward. The Centre must, too.</font></span></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 11 November, 2010, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/behind-the-curve/709373/',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'behind-the-curve-4252',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 4252,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 4162
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Behind the curve'
$metaKeywords = 'Land Acquisition'
$metaDesc = 'In the first week of September, two things happened in western Uttar Pradesh. The first is that a township that was supposed to be constructed in Aligarh district as part of the Yamuna Expressway project was scrapped. The second was...'
$disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium"><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><br /></font></span></div><div style="text-align: justify"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium"><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">In the first week of September, two things happened in western Uttar Pradesh. The first is that a township that was supposed to be constructed in Aligarh district as part of the Yamuna Expressway project was scrapped. The second was that the UP government announced a revised compensation scheme for the acquisition of land. And now, more than two months later, that bears fruit: the township is back on, and the local farmers who are selling their land will benefit from the new policy. This is a reminder of the fact that the resistance to land acquisition across India is not necessarily a resistance to the idea of losing land; it is to the perception that the process available to, and the compensation offered to, those selling land is haphazard and unfair.</font></span></div><div style="text-align: justify"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium"><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><br /></font></span></div><div style="text-align: justify"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium"><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">The UP government figured this out well ahead of the curve. It used the protests in August from some farmers affected by the Expressway as a political peg to move the compensation debate to a new level. The policy it announced had, for example, a yearly payment component, something Haryana, too, has tried with success. First of all, the base price would be settled through negotiation, not through fiat. Second, the farmer would be offered Rs 20,000 per acre for 33 years after acquisition (increased by Rs 600 per acre every year). The options wouldn&rsquo;t stop there: they would also be able to access, if they preferred, a one-time payment of Rs 2.4 lakh per acre. Providing farmers with options and keeping the door to negotiations open, isn&rsquo;t that what political solutions are about? The UP government certainly thought so, even as the other political players in Western UP took one badly-thought out position after another on the acquisition protests. Indeed, a day after Congress General Secretary Rahul Gandhi visited Aligarh to meet farmers, UP Chief Minister Mayawati released a statement saying that &ldquo;those politicians who are busy undertaking trips to Aligarh with the obvious intent of politicising the issue, should ask the Central government to amend the archaic Land Acquisition Act of 1894, if they were truly interested in the well-being of farmers.&rdquo;</font></span></div><div style="text-align: justify"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium"><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif"><br /></font></span></div><div style="text-align: justify"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium"><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">A new land acquisition act is part of the agenda for this session of Parliament. The Trinamool Congress has previously blocked its discussion, but has nuanced that stance recently. The states, especially UP, are moving forward. The Centre must, too.</font></span></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

Behind the curve

In the first week of September, two things happened in western Uttar Pradesh. The first is that a township that was supposed to be constructed in Aligarh district as part of the Yamuna Expressway project was scrapped. The second was that the UP government announced a revised compensation scheme for the acquisition of land. And now, more than two months later, that bears fruit: the township is back on, and the local farmers who are selling their land will benefit from the new policy. This is a reminder of the fact that the resistance to land acquisition across India is not necessarily a resistance to the idea of losing land; it is to the perception that the process available to, and the compensation offered to, those selling land is haphazard and unfair. The UP government figured this out well ahead of the curve. It used the protests in August from some farmers affected by the Expressway as a political peg to move the compensation debate to a new level. The policy it announced had, for example, a yearly payment component, something Haryana, too, has tried with success. First of all, the base price would be settled through negotiation, not through fiat. Second, the farmer would be offered Rs 20,000 per acre for 33 years after acquisition (increased by Rs 600 per acre every year). The options wouldn’t stop there: they would also be able to access, if they preferred, a one-time payment of Rs 2.4 lakh per acre. Providing farmers with options and keeping the door to negotiations open, isn’t that what political solutions are about? The UP government certainly thought so, even as the other political players in Western UP took one badly-thought out position after another on the acquisition protests. Indeed, a day after Congress General Secretary Rahul Gandhi visited Aligarh to meet farmers, UP Chief Minister Mayawati released a statement saying that “those politicians who are busy undertaking trips to Aligarh with the obvious intent of politicising the issue, should ask the Central government to amend the archaic Land Acquisition Act of 1894, if they were truly interested in the well-being of farmers.” A new land acquisition act is part of the agenda for this session of Parliament. The Trinamool Congress has previously blocked its discussion, but has nuanced that stance recently. The states, especially UP, are moving forward. The Centre must, too.