Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
if (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {
'status' => (int) 200,
'contentType' => 'text/html',
'headers' => [
'Content-Type' => [
[maximum depth reached]
]
],
'file' => null,
'fileRange' => [],
'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
'cacheDirectives' => [],
'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea44e83449d-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea44e83449d-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67ea44e83449d-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea44e83449d-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea44e83449d-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea44e83449d-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea44e83449d-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67ea44e83449d-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">>
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/>
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/>
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67ea44e83449d-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 6109,
'title' => 'Beneficiaries may not get arrears by NJ Nair',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
<em>Loss due to MGNREGS wage revision put at Rs.9.8 crore<br />
<br />
Revised rate below the rate fixed by the State<br />
<br />
Centre ignored State's plea for wage parity<br />
</em><br />
About 9.8 lakh beneficiaries of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) are unlikely to get arrears at the revised minimum wage rate of Rs.150 fixed by the Centre from January 1.<br />
<br />
The loss on this score has been estimated at about Rs.9.8 crore.<br />
<br />
A Union Rural Development Ministry notification on January 14 said that beneficiaries of the scheme were eligible for a revised minimum wage of Rs.150 from January 1, 2011, against the Rs.125 paid to them earlier. Subsequently, in another notification on Fe bruary 14, the Ministry said though the revised wage rate had come into from January 1, either that day &ldquo;or the date of actual payment of the revised wage rate, whichever is later&rdquo; should be considered for disbursing the wages.<br />
<br />
Going by the official data, a labourer who worked for four days in a month was eligible to get Rs.100 arrears.<br />
<br />
Thus the arrears amounted to Rs.9.8 crore. This may vary depending on the number of days the beneficiaries had worked in January.<br />
<br />
Official sources told The Hindu here that by changing the date, beneficiaries who had collected their wages had been deprived of the enhanced rate fixed by the Centre.<br />
<br />
Even the revised rate of the Centre was much below the minimum wage rate of Rs.200 fixed by the State government.<br />
<br />
On enhancing the minimum wages, the Local Administration Department had repeatedly urged the Centre to ensure wage parity for the scheme, but to no avail.<br />
<br />
The wage rate for the scheme was revised from Rs.125 to Rs.150 after linking it with the consumer price index. Thus beneficiaries in Haryana would get Rs.179 and Chandigarh Rs.174, which were still lower than the minimum rate of the State government. The State government's plea to clear the confusion over the disbursal date a fortnight ago failed to invoke a positive response
</div>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 21 February, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/02/21/stories/2011022151110300.htm',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'beneficiaries-may-not-get-arrears-by-nj-nair-6203',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 6203,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
},
'articleid' => (int) 6109,
'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Beneficiaries may not get arrears by NJ Nair',
'metaKeywords' => 'NREGS',
'metaDesc' => '
Loss due to MGNREGS wage revision put at Rs.9.8 crore
Revised rate below the rate fixed by the State
Centre ignored State's plea for wage parity
About 9.8 lakh beneficiaries of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) are unlikely to...',
'disp' => '<div align="justify"><em>Loss due to MGNREGS wage revision put at Rs.9.8 crore<br /><br />Revised rate below the rate fixed by the State<br /><br />Centre ignored State's plea for wage parity<br /></em><br />About 9.8 lakh beneficiaries of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) are unlikely to get arrears at the revised minimum wage rate of Rs.150 fixed by the Centre from January 1.<br /><br />The loss on this score has been estimated at about Rs.9.8 crore.<br /><br />A Union Rural Development Ministry notification on January 14 said that beneficiaries of the scheme were eligible for a revised minimum wage of Rs.150 from January 1, 2011, against the Rs.125 paid to them earlier. Subsequently, in another notification on Fe bruary 14, the Ministry said though the revised wage rate had come into from January 1, either that day &ldquo;or the date of actual payment of the revised wage rate, whichever is later&rdquo; should be considered for disbursing the wages.<br /><br />Going by the official data, a labourer who worked for four days in a month was eligible to get Rs.100 arrears.<br /><br />Thus the arrears amounted to Rs.9.8 crore. This may vary depending on the number of days the beneficiaries had worked in January.<br /><br />Official sources told The Hindu here that by changing the date, beneficiaries who had collected their wages had been deprived of the enhanced rate fixed by the Centre.<br /><br />Even the revised rate of the Centre was much below the minimum wage rate of Rs.200 fixed by the State government.<br /><br />On enhancing the minimum wages, the Local Administration Department had repeatedly urged the Centre to ensure wage parity for the scheme, but to no avail.<br /><br />The wage rate for the scheme was revised from Rs.125 to Rs.150 after linking it with the consumer price index. Thus beneficiaries in Haryana would get Rs.179 and Chandigarh Rs.174, which were still lower than the minimum rate of the State government. The State government's plea to clear the confusion over the disbursal date a fortnight ago failed to invoke a positive response</div>',
'lang' => 'English',
'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
'site_title' => 'im4change',
'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 6109,
'title' => 'Beneficiaries may not get arrears by NJ Nair',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
<em>Loss due to MGNREGS wage revision put at Rs.9.8 crore<br />
<br />
Revised rate below the rate fixed by the State<br />
<br />
Centre ignored State's plea for wage parity<br />
</em><br />
About 9.8 lakh beneficiaries of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) are unlikely to get arrears at the revised minimum wage rate of Rs.150 fixed by the Centre from January 1.<br />
<br />
The loss on this score has been estimated at about Rs.9.8 crore.<br />
<br />
A Union Rural Development Ministry notification on January 14 said that beneficiaries of the scheme were eligible for a revised minimum wage of Rs.150 from January 1, 2011, against the Rs.125 paid to them earlier. Subsequently, in another notification on Fe bruary 14, the Ministry said though the revised wage rate had come into from January 1, either that day &ldquo;or the date of actual payment of the revised wage rate, whichever is later&rdquo; should be considered for disbursing the wages.<br />
<br />
Going by the official data, a labourer who worked for four days in a month was eligible to get Rs.100 arrears.<br />
<br />
Thus the arrears amounted to Rs.9.8 crore. This may vary depending on the number of days the beneficiaries had worked in January.<br />
<br />
Official sources told The Hindu here that by changing the date, beneficiaries who had collected their wages had been deprived of the enhanced rate fixed by the Centre.<br />
<br />
Even the revised rate of the Centre was much below the minimum wage rate of Rs.200 fixed by the State government.<br />
<br />
On enhancing the minimum wages, the Local Administration Department had repeatedly urged the Centre to ensure wage parity for the scheme, but to no avail.<br />
<br />
The wage rate for the scheme was revised from Rs.125 to Rs.150 after linking it with the consumer price index. Thus beneficiaries in Haryana would get Rs.179 and Chandigarh Rs.174, which were still lower than the minimum rate of the State government. The State government's plea to clear the confusion over the disbursal date a fortnight ago failed to invoke a positive response
</div>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 21 February, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/02/21/stories/2011022151110300.htm',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'beneficiaries-may-not-get-arrears-by-nj-nair-6203',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 6203,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
'*' => true,
'id' => false
],
'[dirty]' => [],
'[original]' => [],
'[virtual]' => [],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [],
'[invalid]' => [],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
}
$articleid = (int) 6109
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Beneficiaries may not get arrears by NJ Nair'
$metaKeywords = 'NREGS'
$metaDesc = '
Loss due to MGNREGS wage revision put at Rs.9.8 crore
Revised rate below the rate fixed by the State
Centre ignored State's plea for wage parity
About 9.8 lakh beneficiaries of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) are unlikely to...'
$disp = '<div align="justify"><em>Loss due to MGNREGS wage revision put at Rs.9.8 crore<br /><br />Revised rate below the rate fixed by the State<br /><br />Centre ignored State's plea for wage parity<br /></em><br />About 9.8 lakh beneficiaries of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) are unlikely to get arrears at the revised minimum wage rate of Rs.150 fixed by the Centre from January 1.<br /><br />The loss on this score has been estimated at about Rs.9.8 crore.<br /><br />A Union Rural Development Ministry notification on January 14 said that beneficiaries of the scheme were eligible for a revised minimum wage of Rs.150 from January 1, 2011, against the Rs.125 paid to them earlier. Subsequently, in another notification on Fe bruary 14, the Ministry said though the revised wage rate had come into from January 1, either that day &ldquo;or the date of actual payment of the revised wage rate, whichever is later&rdquo; should be considered for disbursing the wages.<br /><br />Going by the official data, a labourer who worked for four days in a month was eligible to get Rs.100 arrears.<br /><br />Thus the arrears amounted to Rs.9.8 crore. This may vary depending on the number of days the beneficiaries had worked in January.<br /><br />Official sources told The Hindu here that by changing the date, beneficiaries who had collected their wages had been deprived of the enhanced rate fixed by the Centre.<br /><br />Even the revised rate of the Centre was much below the minimum wage rate of Rs.200 fixed by the State government.<br /><br />On enhancing the minimum wages, the Local Administration Department had repeatedly urged the Centre to ensure wage parity for the scheme, but to no avail.<br /><br />The wage rate for the scheme was revised from Rs.125 to Rs.150 after linking it with the consumer price index. Thus beneficiaries in Haryana would get Rs.179 and Chandigarh Rs.174, which were still lower than the minimum rate of the State government. The State government's plea to clear the confusion over the disbursal date a fortnight ago failed to invoke a positive response</div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/beneficiaries-may-not-get-arrears-by-nj-nair-6203.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
<link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
media="all"/>
<title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Beneficiaries may not get arrears by NJ Nair | Im4change.org</title>
<meta name="description" content="
Loss due to MGNREGS wage revision put at Rs.9.8 crore
Revised rate below the rate fixed by the State
Centre ignored State's plea for wage parity
About 9.8 lakh beneficiaries of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) are unlikely to..."/>
<script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
<script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">
$(document).ready(function () {
var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
$("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
.attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
.load(function () {
pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not
pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
});
});
</script>
<style type="text/css">
@media screen {
div.divFooter {
display: block;
}
}
@media print {
.printbutton {
display: none !important;
}
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
<tr>
<td class="top_bg">
<div class="divFooter">
<img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="topspace"> </td>
</tr>
<tr id="topspace">
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%">
<h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
<strong>Beneficiaries may not get arrears by NJ Nair</strong></h1>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
<div align="justify"><em>Loss due to MGNREGS wage revision put at Rs.9.8 crore<br /><br />Revised rate below the rate fixed by the State<br /><br />Centre ignored State's plea for wage parity<br /></em><br />About 9.8 lakh beneficiaries of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) are unlikely to get arrears at the revised minimum wage rate of Rs.150 fixed by the Centre from January 1.<br /><br />The loss on this score has been estimated at about Rs.9.8 crore.<br /><br />A Union Rural Development Ministry notification on January 14 said that beneficiaries of the scheme were eligible for a revised minimum wage of Rs.150 from January 1, 2011, against the Rs.125 paid to them earlier. Subsequently, in another notification on Fe bruary 14, the Ministry said though the revised wage rate had come into from January 1, either that day “or the date of actual payment of the revised wage rate, whichever is later” should be considered for disbursing the wages.<br /><br />Going by the official data, a labourer who worked for four days in a month was eligible to get Rs.100 arrears.<br /><br />Thus the arrears amounted to Rs.9.8 crore. This may vary depending on the number of days the beneficiaries had worked in January.<br /><br />Official sources told The Hindu here that by changing the date, beneficiaries who had collected their wages had been deprived of the enhanced rate fixed by the Centre.<br /><br />Even the revised rate of the Centre was much below the minimum wage rate of Rs.200 fixed by the State government.<br /><br />On enhancing the minimum wages, the Local Administration Department had repeatedly urged the Centre to ensure wage parity for the scheme, but to no avail.<br /><br />The wage rate for the scheme was revised from Rs.125 to Rs.150 after linking it with the consumer price index. Thus beneficiaries in Haryana would get Rs.179 and Chandigarh Rs.174, which were still lower than the minimum rate of the State government. The State government's plea to clear the confusion over the disbursal date a fortnight ago failed to invoke a positive response</div> </font>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
</table></body>
</html>'
}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {
'status' => (int) 200,
'contentType' => 'text/html',
'headers' => [
'Content-Type' => [
[maximum depth reached]
]
],
'file' => null,
'fileRange' => [],
'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
'cacheDirectives' => [],
'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea44e83449d-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea44e83449d-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67ea44e83449d-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea44e83449d-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea44e83449d-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea44e83449d-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea44e83449d-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67ea44e83449d-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">>
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/>
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/>
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67ea44e83449d-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 6109,
'title' => 'Beneficiaries may not get arrears by NJ Nair',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
<em>Loss due to MGNREGS wage revision put at Rs.9.8 crore<br />
<br />
Revised rate below the rate fixed by the State<br />
<br />
Centre ignored State's plea for wage parity<br />
</em><br />
About 9.8 lakh beneficiaries of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) are unlikely to get arrears at the revised minimum wage rate of Rs.150 fixed by the Centre from January 1.<br />
<br />
The loss on this score has been estimated at about Rs.9.8 crore.<br />
<br />
A Union Rural Development Ministry notification on January 14 said that beneficiaries of the scheme were eligible for a revised minimum wage of Rs.150 from January 1, 2011, against the Rs.125 paid to them earlier. Subsequently, in another notification on Fe bruary 14, the Ministry said though the revised wage rate had come into from January 1, either that day &ldquo;or the date of actual payment of the revised wage rate, whichever is later&rdquo; should be considered for disbursing the wages.<br />
<br />
Going by the official data, a labourer who worked for four days in a month was eligible to get Rs.100 arrears.<br />
<br />
Thus the arrears amounted to Rs.9.8 crore. This may vary depending on the number of days the beneficiaries had worked in January.<br />
<br />
Official sources told The Hindu here that by changing the date, beneficiaries who had collected their wages had been deprived of the enhanced rate fixed by the Centre.<br />
<br />
Even the revised rate of the Centre was much below the minimum wage rate of Rs.200 fixed by the State government.<br />
<br />
On enhancing the minimum wages, the Local Administration Department had repeatedly urged the Centre to ensure wage parity for the scheme, but to no avail.<br />
<br />
The wage rate for the scheme was revised from Rs.125 to Rs.150 after linking it with the consumer price index. Thus beneficiaries in Haryana would get Rs.179 and Chandigarh Rs.174, which were still lower than the minimum rate of the State government. The State government's plea to clear the confusion over the disbursal date a fortnight ago failed to invoke a positive response
</div>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 21 February, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/02/21/stories/2011022151110300.htm',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'beneficiaries-may-not-get-arrears-by-nj-nair-6203',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 6203,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
},
'articleid' => (int) 6109,
'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Beneficiaries may not get arrears by NJ Nair',
'metaKeywords' => 'NREGS',
'metaDesc' => '
Loss due to MGNREGS wage revision put at Rs.9.8 crore
Revised rate below the rate fixed by the State
Centre ignored State's plea for wage parity
About 9.8 lakh beneficiaries of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) are unlikely to...',
'disp' => '<div align="justify"><em>Loss due to MGNREGS wage revision put at Rs.9.8 crore<br /><br />Revised rate below the rate fixed by the State<br /><br />Centre ignored State's plea for wage parity<br /></em><br />About 9.8 lakh beneficiaries of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) are unlikely to get arrears at the revised minimum wage rate of Rs.150 fixed by the Centre from January 1.<br /><br />The loss on this score has been estimated at about Rs.9.8 crore.<br /><br />A Union Rural Development Ministry notification on January 14 said that beneficiaries of the scheme were eligible for a revised minimum wage of Rs.150 from January 1, 2011, against the Rs.125 paid to them earlier. Subsequently, in another notification on Fe bruary 14, the Ministry said though the revised wage rate had come into from January 1, either that day &ldquo;or the date of actual payment of the revised wage rate, whichever is later&rdquo; should be considered for disbursing the wages.<br /><br />Going by the official data, a labourer who worked for four days in a month was eligible to get Rs.100 arrears.<br /><br />Thus the arrears amounted to Rs.9.8 crore. This may vary depending on the number of days the beneficiaries had worked in January.<br /><br />Official sources told The Hindu here that by changing the date, beneficiaries who had collected their wages had been deprived of the enhanced rate fixed by the Centre.<br /><br />Even the revised rate of the Centre was much below the minimum wage rate of Rs.200 fixed by the State government.<br /><br />On enhancing the minimum wages, the Local Administration Department had repeatedly urged the Centre to ensure wage parity for the scheme, but to no avail.<br /><br />The wage rate for the scheme was revised from Rs.125 to Rs.150 after linking it with the consumer price index. Thus beneficiaries in Haryana would get Rs.179 and Chandigarh Rs.174, which were still lower than the minimum rate of the State government. The State government's plea to clear the confusion over the disbursal date a fortnight ago failed to invoke a positive response</div>',
'lang' => 'English',
'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
'site_title' => 'im4change',
'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 6109,
'title' => 'Beneficiaries may not get arrears by NJ Nair',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
<em>Loss due to MGNREGS wage revision put at Rs.9.8 crore<br />
<br />
Revised rate below the rate fixed by the State<br />
<br />
Centre ignored State's plea for wage parity<br />
</em><br />
About 9.8 lakh beneficiaries of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) are unlikely to get arrears at the revised minimum wage rate of Rs.150 fixed by the Centre from January 1.<br />
<br />
The loss on this score has been estimated at about Rs.9.8 crore.<br />
<br />
A Union Rural Development Ministry notification on January 14 said that beneficiaries of the scheme were eligible for a revised minimum wage of Rs.150 from January 1, 2011, against the Rs.125 paid to them earlier. Subsequently, in another notification on Fe bruary 14, the Ministry said though the revised wage rate had come into from January 1, either that day &ldquo;or the date of actual payment of the revised wage rate, whichever is later&rdquo; should be considered for disbursing the wages.<br />
<br />
Going by the official data, a labourer who worked for four days in a month was eligible to get Rs.100 arrears.<br />
<br />
Thus the arrears amounted to Rs.9.8 crore. This may vary depending on the number of days the beneficiaries had worked in January.<br />
<br />
Official sources told The Hindu here that by changing the date, beneficiaries who had collected their wages had been deprived of the enhanced rate fixed by the Centre.<br />
<br />
Even the revised rate of the Centre was much below the minimum wage rate of Rs.200 fixed by the State government.<br />
<br />
On enhancing the minimum wages, the Local Administration Department had repeatedly urged the Centre to ensure wage parity for the scheme, but to no avail.<br />
<br />
The wage rate for the scheme was revised from Rs.125 to Rs.150 after linking it with the consumer price index. Thus beneficiaries in Haryana would get Rs.179 and Chandigarh Rs.174, which were still lower than the minimum rate of the State government. The State government's plea to clear the confusion over the disbursal date a fortnight ago failed to invoke a positive response
</div>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 21 February, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/02/21/stories/2011022151110300.htm',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'beneficiaries-may-not-get-arrears-by-nj-nair-6203',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 6203,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
'*' => true,
'id' => false
],
'[dirty]' => [],
'[original]' => [],
'[virtual]' => [],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [],
'[invalid]' => [],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
}
$articleid = (int) 6109
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Beneficiaries may not get arrears by NJ Nair'
$metaKeywords = 'NREGS'
$metaDesc = '
Loss due to MGNREGS wage revision put at Rs.9.8 crore
Revised rate below the rate fixed by the State
Centre ignored State's plea for wage parity
About 9.8 lakh beneficiaries of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) are unlikely to...'
$disp = '<div align="justify"><em>Loss due to MGNREGS wage revision put at Rs.9.8 crore<br /><br />Revised rate below the rate fixed by the State<br /><br />Centre ignored State's plea for wage parity<br /></em><br />About 9.8 lakh beneficiaries of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) are unlikely to get arrears at the revised minimum wage rate of Rs.150 fixed by the Centre from January 1.<br /><br />The loss on this score has been estimated at about Rs.9.8 crore.<br /><br />A Union Rural Development Ministry notification on January 14 said that beneficiaries of the scheme were eligible for a revised minimum wage of Rs.150 from January 1, 2011, against the Rs.125 paid to them earlier. Subsequently, in another notification on Fe bruary 14, the Ministry said though the revised wage rate had come into from January 1, either that day &ldquo;or the date of actual payment of the revised wage rate, whichever is later&rdquo; should be considered for disbursing the wages.<br /><br />Going by the official data, a labourer who worked for four days in a month was eligible to get Rs.100 arrears.<br /><br />Thus the arrears amounted to Rs.9.8 crore. This may vary depending on the number of days the beneficiaries had worked in January.<br /><br />Official sources told The Hindu here that by changing the date, beneficiaries who had collected their wages had been deprived of the enhanced rate fixed by the Centre.<br /><br />Even the revised rate of the Centre was much below the minimum wage rate of Rs.200 fixed by the State government.<br /><br />On enhancing the minimum wages, the Local Administration Department had repeatedly urged the Centre to ensure wage parity for the scheme, but to no avail.<br /><br />The wage rate for the scheme was revised from Rs.125 to Rs.150 after linking it with the consumer price index. Thus beneficiaries in Haryana would get Rs.179 and Chandigarh Rs.174, which were still lower than the minimum rate of the State government. The State government's plea to clear the confusion over the disbursal date a fortnight ago failed to invoke a positive response</div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/beneficiaries-may-not-get-arrears-by-nj-nair-6203.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
<link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
media="all"/>
<title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Beneficiaries may not get arrears by NJ Nair | Im4change.org</title>
<meta name="description" content="
Loss due to MGNREGS wage revision put at Rs.9.8 crore
Revised rate below the rate fixed by the State
Centre ignored State's plea for wage parity
About 9.8 lakh beneficiaries of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) are unlikely to..."/>
<script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
<script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">
$(document).ready(function () {
var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
$("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
.attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
.load(function () {
pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not
pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
});
});
</script>
<style type="text/css">
@media screen {
div.divFooter {
display: block;
}
}
@media print {
.printbutton {
display: none !important;
}
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
<tr>
<td class="top_bg">
<div class="divFooter">
<img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="topspace"> </td>
</tr>
<tr id="topspace">
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%">
<h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
<strong>Beneficiaries may not get arrears by NJ Nair</strong></h1>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
<div align="justify"><em>Loss due to MGNREGS wage revision put at Rs.9.8 crore<br /><br />Revised rate below the rate fixed by the State<br /><br />Centre ignored State's plea for wage parity<br /></em><br />About 9.8 lakh beneficiaries of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) are unlikely to get arrears at the revised minimum wage rate of Rs.150 fixed by the Centre from January 1.<br /><br />The loss on this score has been estimated at about Rs.9.8 crore.<br /><br />A Union Rural Development Ministry notification on January 14 said that beneficiaries of the scheme were eligible for a revised minimum wage of Rs.150 from January 1, 2011, against the Rs.125 paid to them earlier. Subsequently, in another notification on Fe bruary 14, the Ministry said though the revised wage rate had come into from January 1, either that day “or the date of actual payment of the revised wage rate, whichever is later” should be considered for disbursing the wages.<br /><br />Going by the official data, a labourer who worked for four days in a month was eligible to get Rs.100 arrears.<br /><br />Thus the arrears amounted to Rs.9.8 crore. This may vary depending on the number of days the beneficiaries had worked in January.<br /><br />Official sources told The Hindu here that by changing the date, beneficiaries who had collected their wages had been deprived of the enhanced rate fixed by the Centre.<br /><br />Even the revised rate of the Centre was much below the minimum wage rate of Rs.200 fixed by the State government.<br /><br />On enhancing the minimum wages, the Local Administration Department had repeatedly urged the Centre to ensure wage parity for the scheme, but to no avail.<br /><br />The wage rate for the scheme was revised from Rs.125 to Rs.150 after linking it with the consumer price index. Thus beneficiaries in Haryana would get Rs.179 and Chandigarh Rs.174, which were still lower than the minimum rate of the State government. The State government's plea to clear the confusion over the disbursal date a fortnight ago failed to invoke a positive response</div> </font>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
</table></body>
</html>'
}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {
'status' => (int) 200,
'contentType' => 'text/html',
'headers' => [
'Content-Type' => [
[maximum depth reached]
]
],
'file' => null,
'fileRange' => [],
'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
'cacheDirectives' => [],
'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea44e83449d-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea44e83449d-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67ea44e83449d-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea44e83449d-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea44e83449d-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea44e83449d-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea44e83449d-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67ea44e83449d-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">>
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/>
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/>
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67ea44e83449d-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 6109,
'title' => 'Beneficiaries may not get arrears by NJ Nair',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
<em>Loss due to MGNREGS wage revision put at Rs.9.8 crore<br />
<br />
Revised rate below the rate fixed by the State<br />
<br />
Centre ignored State's plea for wage parity<br />
</em><br />
About 9.8 lakh beneficiaries of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) are unlikely to get arrears at the revised minimum wage rate of Rs.150 fixed by the Centre from January 1.<br />
<br />
The loss on this score has been estimated at about Rs.9.8 crore.<br />
<br />
A Union Rural Development Ministry notification on January 14 said that beneficiaries of the scheme were eligible for a revised minimum wage of Rs.150 from January 1, 2011, against the Rs.125 paid to them earlier. Subsequently, in another notification on Fe bruary 14, the Ministry said though the revised wage rate had come into from January 1, either that day &ldquo;or the date of actual payment of the revised wage rate, whichever is later&rdquo; should be considered for disbursing the wages.<br />
<br />
Going by the official data, a labourer who worked for four days in a month was eligible to get Rs.100 arrears.<br />
<br />
Thus the arrears amounted to Rs.9.8 crore. This may vary depending on the number of days the beneficiaries had worked in January.<br />
<br />
Official sources told The Hindu here that by changing the date, beneficiaries who had collected their wages had been deprived of the enhanced rate fixed by the Centre.<br />
<br />
Even the revised rate of the Centre was much below the minimum wage rate of Rs.200 fixed by the State government.<br />
<br />
On enhancing the minimum wages, the Local Administration Department had repeatedly urged the Centre to ensure wage parity for the scheme, but to no avail.<br />
<br />
The wage rate for the scheme was revised from Rs.125 to Rs.150 after linking it with the consumer price index. Thus beneficiaries in Haryana would get Rs.179 and Chandigarh Rs.174, which were still lower than the minimum rate of the State government. The State government's plea to clear the confusion over the disbursal date a fortnight ago failed to invoke a positive response
</div>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 21 February, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/02/21/stories/2011022151110300.htm',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'beneficiaries-may-not-get-arrears-by-nj-nair-6203',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 6203,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
},
'articleid' => (int) 6109,
'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Beneficiaries may not get arrears by NJ Nair',
'metaKeywords' => 'NREGS',
'metaDesc' => '
Loss due to MGNREGS wage revision put at Rs.9.8 crore
Revised rate below the rate fixed by the State
Centre ignored State's plea for wage parity
About 9.8 lakh beneficiaries of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) are unlikely to...',
'disp' => '<div align="justify"><em>Loss due to MGNREGS wage revision put at Rs.9.8 crore<br /><br />Revised rate below the rate fixed by the State<br /><br />Centre ignored State's plea for wage parity<br /></em><br />About 9.8 lakh beneficiaries of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) are unlikely to get arrears at the revised minimum wage rate of Rs.150 fixed by the Centre from January 1.<br /><br />The loss on this score has been estimated at about Rs.9.8 crore.<br /><br />A Union Rural Development Ministry notification on January 14 said that beneficiaries of the scheme were eligible for a revised minimum wage of Rs.150 from January 1, 2011, against the Rs.125 paid to them earlier. Subsequently, in another notification on Fe bruary 14, the Ministry said though the revised wage rate had come into from January 1, either that day &ldquo;or the date of actual payment of the revised wage rate, whichever is later&rdquo; should be considered for disbursing the wages.<br /><br />Going by the official data, a labourer who worked for four days in a month was eligible to get Rs.100 arrears.<br /><br />Thus the arrears amounted to Rs.9.8 crore. This may vary depending on the number of days the beneficiaries had worked in January.<br /><br />Official sources told The Hindu here that by changing the date, beneficiaries who had collected their wages had been deprived of the enhanced rate fixed by the Centre.<br /><br />Even the revised rate of the Centre was much below the minimum wage rate of Rs.200 fixed by the State government.<br /><br />On enhancing the minimum wages, the Local Administration Department had repeatedly urged the Centre to ensure wage parity for the scheme, but to no avail.<br /><br />The wage rate for the scheme was revised from Rs.125 to Rs.150 after linking it with the consumer price index. Thus beneficiaries in Haryana would get Rs.179 and Chandigarh Rs.174, which were still lower than the minimum rate of the State government. The State government's plea to clear the confusion over the disbursal date a fortnight ago failed to invoke a positive response</div>',
'lang' => 'English',
'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
'site_title' => 'im4change',
'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 6109,
'title' => 'Beneficiaries may not get arrears by NJ Nair',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
<em>Loss due to MGNREGS wage revision put at Rs.9.8 crore<br />
<br />
Revised rate below the rate fixed by the State<br />
<br />
Centre ignored State's plea for wage parity<br />
</em><br />
About 9.8 lakh beneficiaries of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) are unlikely to get arrears at the revised minimum wage rate of Rs.150 fixed by the Centre from January 1.<br />
<br />
The loss on this score has been estimated at about Rs.9.8 crore.<br />
<br />
A Union Rural Development Ministry notification on January 14 said that beneficiaries of the scheme were eligible for a revised minimum wage of Rs.150 from January 1, 2011, against the Rs.125 paid to them earlier. Subsequently, in another notification on Fe bruary 14, the Ministry said though the revised wage rate had come into from January 1, either that day &ldquo;or the date of actual payment of the revised wage rate, whichever is later&rdquo; should be considered for disbursing the wages.<br />
<br />
Going by the official data, a labourer who worked for four days in a month was eligible to get Rs.100 arrears.<br />
<br />
Thus the arrears amounted to Rs.9.8 crore. This may vary depending on the number of days the beneficiaries had worked in January.<br />
<br />
Official sources told The Hindu here that by changing the date, beneficiaries who had collected their wages had been deprived of the enhanced rate fixed by the Centre.<br />
<br />
Even the revised rate of the Centre was much below the minimum wage rate of Rs.200 fixed by the State government.<br />
<br />
On enhancing the minimum wages, the Local Administration Department had repeatedly urged the Centre to ensure wage parity for the scheme, but to no avail.<br />
<br />
The wage rate for the scheme was revised from Rs.125 to Rs.150 after linking it with the consumer price index. Thus beneficiaries in Haryana would get Rs.179 and Chandigarh Rs.174, which were still lower than the minimum rate of the State government. The State government's plea to clear the confusion over the disbursal date a fortnight ago failed to invoke a positive response
</div>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 21 February, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/02/21/stories/2011022151110300.htm',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'beneficiaries-may-not-get-arrears-by-nj-nair-6203',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 6203,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
'*' => true,
'id' => false
],
'[dirty]' => [],
'[original]' => [],
'[virtual]' => [],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [],
'[invalid]' => [],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
}
$articleid = (int) 6109
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Beneficiaries may not get arrears by NJ Nair'
$metaKeywords = 'NREGS'
$metaDesc = '
Loss due to MGNREGS wage revision put at Rs.9.8 crore
Revised rate below the rate fixed by the State
Centre ignored State's plea for wage parity
About 9.8 lakh beneficiaries of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) are unlikely to...'
$disp = '<div align="justify"><em>Loss due to MGNREGS wage revision put at Rs.9.8 crore<br /><br />Revised rate below the rate fixed by the State<br /><br />Centre ignored State's plea for wage parity<br /></em><br />About 9.8 lakh beneficiaries of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) are unlikely to get arrears at the revised minimum wage rate of Rs.150 fixed by the Centre from January 1.<br /><br />The loss on this score has been estimated at about Rs.9.8 crore.<br /><br />A Union Rural Development Ministry notification on January 14 said that beneficiaries of the scheme were eligible for a revised minimum wage of Rs.150 from January 1, 2011, against the Rs.125 paid to them earlier. Subsequently, in another notification on Fe bruary 14, the Ministry said though the revised wage rate had come into from January 1, either that day &ldquo;or the date of actual payment of the revised wage rate, whichever is later&rdquo; should be considered for disbursing the wages.<br /><br />Going by the official data, a labourer who worked for four days in a month was eligible to get Rs.100 arrears.<br /><br />Thus the arrears amounted to Rs.9.8 crore. This may vary depending on the number of days the beneficiaries had worked in January.<br /><br />Official sources told The Hindu here that by changing the date, beneficiaries who had collected their wages had been deprived of the enhanced rate fixed by the Centre.<br /><br />Even the revised rate of the Centre was much below the minimum wage rate of Rs.200 fixed by the State government.<br /><br />On enhancing the minimum wages, the Local Administration Department had repeatedly urged the Centre to ensure wage parity for the scheme, but to no avail.<br /><br />The wage rate for the scheme was revised from Rs.125 to Rs.150 after linking it with the consumer price index. Thus beneficiaries in Haryana would get Rs.179 and Chandigarh Rs.174, which were still lower than the minimum rate of the State government. The State government's plea to clear the confusion over the disbursal date a fortnight ago failed to invoke a positive response</div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/beneficiaries-may-not-get-arrears-by-nj-nair-6203.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
<link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
media="all"/>
<title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Beneficiaries may not get arrears by NJ Nair | Im4change.org</title>
<meta name="description" content="
Loss due to MGNREGS wage revision put at Rs.9.8 crore
Revised rate below the rate fixed by the State
Centre ignored State's plea for wage parity
About 9.8 lakh beneficiaries of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) are unlikely to..."/>
<script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
<script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">
$(document).ready(function () {
var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
$("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
.attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
.load(function () {
pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not
pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
});
});
</script>
<style type="text/css">
@media screen {
div.divFooter {
display: block;
}
}
@media print {
.printbutton {
display: none !important;
}
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
<tr>
<td class="top_bg">
<div class="divFooter">
<img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="topspace"> </td>
</tr>
<tr id="topspace">
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%">
<h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
<strong>Beneficiaries may not get arrears by NJ Nair</strong></h1>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
<div align="justify"><em>Loss due to MGNREGS wage revision put at Rs.9.8 crore<br /><br />Revised rate below the rate fixed by the State<br /><br />Centre ignored State's plea for wage parity<br /></em><br />About 9.8 lakh beneficiaries of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) are unlikely to get arrears at the revised minimum wage rate of Rs.150 fixed by the Centre from January 1.<br /><br />The loss on this score has been estimated at about Rs.9.8 crore.<br /><br />A Union Rural Development Ministry notification on January 14 said that beneficiaries of the scheme were eligible for a revised minimum wage of Rs.150 from January 1, 2011, against the Rs.125 paid to them earlier. Subsequently, in another notification on Fe bruary 14, the Ministry said though the revised wage rate had come into from January 1, either that day “or the date of actual payment of the revised wage rate, whichever is later” should be considered for disbursing the wages.<br /><br />Going by the official data, a labourer who worked for four days in a month was eligible to get Rs.100 arrears.<br /><br />Thus the arrears amounted to Rs.9.8 crore. This may vary depending on the number of days the beneficiaries had worked in January.<br /><br />Official sources told The Hindu here that by changing the date, beneficiaries who had collected their wages had been deprived of the enhanced rate fixed by the Centre.<br /><br />Even the revised rate of the Centre was much below the minimum wage rate of Rs.200 fixed by the State government.<br /><br />On enhancing the minimum wages, the Local Administration Department had repeatedly urged the Centre to ensure wage parity for the scheme, but to no avail.<br /><br />The wage rate for the scheme was revised from Rs.125 to Rs.150 after linking it with the consumer price index. Thus beneficiaries in Haryana would get Rs.179 and Chandigarh Rs.174, which were still lower than the minimum rate of the State government. The State government's plea to clear the confusion over the disbursal date a fortnight ago failed to invoke a positive response</div> </font>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
</table></body>
</html>'
}
$cookies = []
$values = [
(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 6109,
'title' => 'Beneficiaries may not get arrears by NJ Nair',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
<em>Loss due to MGNREGS wage revision put at Rs.9.8 crore<br />
<br />
Revised rate below the rate fixed by the State<br />
<br />
Centre ignored State's plea for wage parity<br />
</em><br />
About 9.8 lakh beneficiaries of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) are unlikely to get arrears at the revised minimum wage rate of Rs.150 fixed by the Centre from January 1.<br />
<br />
The loss on this score has been estimated at about Rs.9.8 crore.<br />
<br />
A Union Rural Development Ministry notification on January 14 said that beneficiaries of the scheme were eligible for a revised minimum wage of Rs.150 from January 1, 2011, against the Rs.125 paid to them earlier. Subsequently, in another notification on Fe bruary 14, the Ministry said though the revised wage rate had come into from January 1, either that day “or the date of actual payment of the revised wage rate, whichever is later” should be considered for disbursing the wages.<br />
<br />
Going by the official data, a labourer who worked for four days in a month was eligible to get Rs.100 arrears.<br />
<br />
Thus the arrears amounted to Rs.9.8 crore. This may vary depending on the number of days the beneficiaries had worked in January.<br />
<br />
Official sources told The Hindu here that by changing the date, beneficiaries who had collected their wages had been deprived of the enhanced rate fixed by the Centre.<br />
<br />
Even the revised rate of the Centre was much below the minimum wage rate of Rs.200 fixed by the State government.<br />
<br />
On enhancing the minimum wages, the Local Administration Department had repeatedly urged the Centre to ensure wage parity for the scheme, but to no avail.<br />
<br />
The wage rate for the scheme was revised from Rs.125 to Rs.150 after linking it with the consumer price index. Thus beneficiaries in Haryana would get Rs.179 and Chandigarh Rs.174, which were still lower than the minimum rate of the State government. The State government's plea to clear the confusion over the disbursal date a fortnight ago failed to invoke a positive response
</div>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 21 February, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/02/21/stories/2011022151110300.htm',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'beneficiaries-may-not-get-arrears-by-nj-nair-6203',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 6203,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
},
'articleid' => (int) 6109,
'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Beneficiaries may not get arrears by NJ Nair',
'metaKeywords' => 'NREGS',
'metaDesc' => '
Loss due to MGNREGS wage revision put at Rs.9.8 crore
Revised rate below the rate fixed by the State
Centre ignored State's plea for wage parity
About 9.8 lakh beneficiaries of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) are unlikely to...',
'disp' => '<div align="justify"><em>Loss due to MGNREGS wage revision put at Rs.9.8 crore<br /><br />Revised rate below the rate fixed by the State<br /><br />Centre ignored State's plea for wage parity<br /></em><br />About 9.8 lakh beneficiaries of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) are unlikely to get arrears at the revised minimum wage rate of Rs.150 fixed by the Centre from January 1.<br /><br />The loss on this score has been estimated at about Rs.9.8 crore.<br /><br />A Union Rural Development Ministry notification on January 14 said that beneficiaries of the scheme were eligible for a revised minimum wage of Rs.150 from January 1, 2011, against the Rs.125 paid to them earlier. Subsequently, in another notification on Fe bruary 14, the Ministry said though the revised wage rate had come into from January 1, either that day “or the date of actual payment of the revised wage rate, whichever is later” should be considered for disbursing the wages.<br /><br />Going by the official data, a labourer who worked for four days in a month was eligible to get Rs.100 arrears.<br /><br />Thus the arrears amounted to Rs.9.8 crore. This may vary depending on the number of days the beneficiaries had worked in January.<br /><br />Official sources told The Hindu here that by changing the date, beneficiaries who had collected their wages had been deprived of the enhanced rate fixed by the Centre.<br /><br />Even the revised rate of the Centre was much below the minimum wage rate of Rs.200 fixed by the State government.<br /><br />On enhancing the minimum wages, the Local Administration Department had repeatedly urged the Centre to ensure wage parity for the scheme, but to no avail.<br /><br />The wage rate for the scheme was revised from Rs.125 to Rs.150 after linking it with the consumer price index. Thus beneficiaries in Haryana would get Rs.179 and Chandigarh Rs.174, which were still lower than the minimum rate of the State government. The State government's plea to clear the confusion over the disbursal date a fortnight ago failed to invoke a positive response</div>',
'lang' => 'English',
'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
'site_title' => 'im4change',
'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 6109,
'title' => 'Beneficiaries may not get arrears by NJ Nair',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
<em>Loss due to MGNREGS wage revision put at Rs.9.8 crore<br />
<br />
Revised rate below the rate fixed by the State<br />
<br />
Centre ignored State's plea for wage parity<br />
</em><br />
About 9.8 lakh beneficiaries of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) are unlikely to get arrears at the revised minimum wage rate of Rs.150 fixed by the Centre from January 1.<br />
<br />
The loss on this score has been estimated at about Rs.9.8 crore.<br />
<br />
A Union Rural Development Ministry notification on January 14 said that beneficiaries of the scheme were eligible for a revised minimum wage of Rs.150 from January 1, 2011, against the Rs.125 paid to them earlier. Subsequently, in another notification on Fe bruary 14, the Ministry said though the revised wage rate had come into from January 1, either that day “or the date of actual payment of the revised wage rate, whichever is later” should be considered for disbursing the wages.<br />
<br />
Going by the official data, a labourer who worked for four days in a month was eligible to get Rs.100 arrears.<br />
<br />
Thus the arrears amounted to Rs.9.8 crore. This may vary depending on the number of days the beneficiaries had worked in January.<br />
<br />
Official sources told The Hindu here that by changing the date, beneficiaries who had collected their wages had been deprived of the enhanced rate fixed by the Centre.<br />
<br />
Even the revised rate of the Centre was much below the minimum wage rate of Rs.200 fixed by the State government.<br />
<br />
On enhancing the minimum wages, the Local Administration Department had repeatedly urged the Centre to ensure wage parity for the scheme, but to no avail.<br />
<br />
The wage rate for the scheme was revised from Rs.125 to Rs.150 after linking it with the consumer price index. Thus beneficiaries in Haryana would get Rs.179 and Chandigarh Rs.174, which were still lower than the minimum rate of the State government. The State government's plea to clear the confusion over the disbursal date a fortnight ago failed to invoke a positive response
</div>',
'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 21 February, 2011, http://www.hindu.com/2011/02/21/stories/2011022151110300.htm',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'beneficiaries-may-not-get-arrears-by-nj-nair-6203',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 6203,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
'*' => true,
'id' => false
],
'[dirty]' => [],
'[original]' => [],
'[virtual]' => [],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [],
'[invalid]' => [],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
}
$articleid = (int) 6109
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Beneficiaries may not get arrears by NJ Nair'
$metaKeywords = 'NREGS'
$metaDesc = '
Loss due to MGNREGS wage revision put at Rs.9.8 crore
Revised rate below the rate fixed by the State
Centre ignored State's plea for wage parity
About 9.8 lakh beneficiaries of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) are unlikely to...'
$disp = '<div align="justify"><em>Loss due to MGNREGS wage revision put at Rs.9.8 crore<br /><br />Revised rate below the rate fixed by the State<br /><br />Centre ignored State's plea for wage parity<br /></em><br />About 9.8 lakh beneficiaries of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) are unlikely to get arrears at the revised minimum wage rate of Rs.150 fixed by the Centre from January 1.<br /><br />The loss on this score has been estimated at about Rs.9.8 crore.<br /><br />A Union Rural Development Ministry notification on January 14 said that beneficiaries of the scheme were eligible for a revised minimum wage of Rs.150 from January 1, 2011, against the Rs.125 paid to them earlier. Subsequently, in another notification on Fe bruary 14, the Ministry said though the revised wage rate had come into from January 1, either that day “or the date of actual payment of the revised wage rate, whichever is later” should be considered for disbursing the wages.<br /><br />Going by the official data, a labourer who worked for four days in a month was eligible to get Rs.100 arrears.<br /><br />Thus the arrears amounted to Rs.9.8 crore. This may vary depending on the number of days the beneficiaries had worked in January.<br /><br />Official sources told The Hindu here that by changing the date, beneficiaries who had collected their wages had been deprived of the enhanced rate fixed by the Centre.<br /><br />Even the revised rate of the Centre was much below the minimum wage rate of Rs.200 fixed by the State government.<br /><br />On enhancing the minimum wages, the Local Administration Department had repeatedly urged the Centre to ensure wage parity for the scheme, but to no avail.<br /><br />The wage rate for the scheme was revised from Rs.125 to Rs.150 after linking it with the consumer price index. Thus beneficiaries in Haryana would get Rs.179 and Chandigarh Rs.174, which were still lower than the minimum rate of the State government. The State government's plea to clear the confusion over the disbursal date a fortnight ago failed to invoke a positive response</div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
latest-news-updates/beneficiaries-may-not-get-arrears-by-nj-nair-6203.html"/>
LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Beneficiaries may not get arrears by NJ Nair | Im4change.org
Beneficiaries may not get arrears by NJ Nair
Loss due to MGNREGS wage revision put at Rs.9.8 crore
Revised rate below the rate fixed by the State
Centre ignored State's plea for wage parity
About 9.8 lakh beneficiaries of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) are unlikely to get arrears at the revised minimum wage rate of Rs.150 fixed by the Centre from January 1.
The loss on this score has been estimated at about Rs.9.8 crore.
A Union Rural Development Ministry notification on January 14 said that beneficiaries of the scheme were eligible for a revised minimum wage of Rs.150 from January 1, 2011, against the Rs.125 paid to them earlier. Subsequently, in another notification on Fe bruary 14, the Ministry said though the revised wage rate had come into from January 1, either that day “or the date of actual payment of the revised wage rate, whichever is later” should be considered for disbursing the wages.
Going by the official data, a labourer who worked for four days in a month was eligible to get Rs.100 arrears.
Thus the arrears amounted to Rs.9.8 crore. This may vary depending on the number of days the beneficiaries had worked in January.
Official sources told The Hindu here that by changing the date, beneficiaries who had collected their wages had been deprived of the enhanced rate fixed by the Centre.
Even the revised rate of the Centre was much below the minimum wage rate of Rs.200 fixed by the State government.
On enhancing the minimum wages, the Local Administration Department had repeatedly urged the Centre to ensure wage parity for the scheme, but to no avail.
The wage rate for the scheme was revised from Rs.125 to Rs.150 after linking it with the consumer price index. Thus beneficiaries in Haryana would get Rs.179 and Chandigarh Rs.174, which were still lower than the minimum rate of the State government. The State government's plea to clear the confusion over the disbursal date a fortnight ago failed to invoke a positive response
