Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/bengal-govt-sits-on-cbi-report-in-nandigram-case-21651/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/bengal-govt-sits-on-cbi-report-in-nandigram-case-21651/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/bengal-govt-sits-on-cbi-report-in-nandigram-case-21651/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/bengal-govt-sits-on-cbi-report-in-nandigram-case-21651/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680509e3226b6-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680509e3226b6-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680509e3226b6-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680509e3226b6-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680509e3226b6-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680509e3226b6-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680509e3226b6-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680509e3226b6-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680509e3226b6-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 21504,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Bengal govt sits on CBI report in Nandigram case&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Hindustan Times
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Kolkata: &lt;/em&gt;The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on Thursday blamed the Mamata Banerjee government for not granting sanction for the prosecution of the state police and other state officials in the Nandigram police firing case during the CPI(M) regime in 2007.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Taking exception to the CBI&#039;s report, Justices Ashim Kumar Banerjee and Mrinal Kanti Chaudhuri directed the state to submit an action taken report on CBI&#039;s plea for granting sanction for prosecution of the erring police officials for hearing on June 21. The directive came on a petition filed by the family members of fourteen villagers, who were shot by policemen. Several women were also allegedly raped.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Asked by the court, the agency reported that it had concluded the probe and was ready to file a charge sheet, but was awaiting sanction from the state for prosecution of some police officials. The CBI reported that it had written to the state on December 5, 2012 and also clarified some points on April 17, 2013, but till date the state had not granted sanction.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The court had sought a CBI status report after advocate Rajdip Majumdar, representing the affected villagers, told the court that despite the passage of over six years the CBI had not filed a charge sheet in the Nandigram firing case.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Recently, the CBI reportedly submitted a report to the Mamata Banerjee government, giving a clean chit to former chief minister Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee in the case. The agency, however, reportedly indicted twelve top cops and government officials responsible for the firing without provocation from villagers. The agency also sought the state&#039;s permission to file a charge sheet against five cops. It also recommended a &amp;quot;major penalty&amp;quot; against the then district magistrate Anup Agarwal and five other officers.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The incident occurred on March 14, 2007 when armed CPI(M) cadres in police uniform, along with about 3,000 cops, allegedly raided Nandigram and attacked the villagers from three sides. The then inspector general of police, Arun Gupta, along with superintendent of police Ganghi Srinivasan and additional superintendent of police Tanmay Roychowdhury, allegedly led the attack from one side where eleven people were killed.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In another spot, two IPS officers, Satyajit Bandhopadhay and Debashish Baral, were allegedly present along with the officer-in-charge of Nandigram Shekhar Ray.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Acting on a PIL moved by Trinamool MP and advocate Kalyan Banerjee, the high court directed the CBI to probe the incident, but not file a charge sheet without its permission. Subsequently, the high court held the police firing &amp;quot;unconstitutional&amp;quot; and also ordered compensation to the deceased&#039;s family, rape victims and seriously injured persons.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Although the CPI(M) government paid compensation to the victims, it challenged the verdict in the Supreme Court. Subsequently, Mamata Banerjee withdrew the appeal from the apex court.
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindustan Times, 21 June, 2013, http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/Kolkata/Bengal-govt-sits-on-CBI-report-in-Nandigram-case/Article1-1079967.aspx&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;bengal-govt-sits-on-cbi-report-in-nandigram-case-21651&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 21651,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 21504,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Bengal govt sits on CBI report in Nandigram case&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;police,Law and Justice,Human Rights,Land Acquisition&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Hindustan Times



Kolkata: The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on Thursday blamed the Mamata Banerjee government for not granting sanction for the prosecution of the state police and other state officials in the Nandigram police firing case during the CPI(M)...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Hindustan Times&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Kolkata: &lt;/em&gt;The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on Thursday blamed the Mamata Banerjee government for not granting sanction for the prosecution of the state police and other state officials in the Nandigram police firing case during the CPI(M) regime in 2007.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Taking exception to the CBI&#039;s report, Justices Ashim Kumar Banerjee and Mrinal Kanti Chaudhuri directed the state to submit an action taken report on CBI&#039;s plea for granting sanction for prosecution of the erring police officials for hearing on June 21. The directive came on a petition filed by the family members of fourteen villagers, who were shot by policemen. Several women were also allegedly raped.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Asked by the court, the agency reported that it had concluded the probe and was ready to file a charge sheet, but was awaiting sanction from the state for prosecution of some police officials. The CBI reported that it had written to the state on December 5, 2012 and also clarified some points on April 17, 2013, but till date the state had not granted sanction.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The court had sought a CBI status report after advocate Rajdip Majumdar, representing the affected villagers, told the court that despite the passage of over six years the CBI had not filed a charge sheet in the Nandigram firing case.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Recently, the CBI reportedly submitted a report to the Mamata Banerjee government, giving a clean chit to former chief minister Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee in the case. The agency, however, reportedly indicted twelve top cops and government officials responsible for the firing without provocation from villagers. The agency also sought the state&#039;s permission to file a charge sheet against five cops. It also recommended a &amp;quot;major penalty&amp;quot; against the then district magistrate Anup Agarwal and five other officers.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The incident occurred on March 14, 2007 when armed CPI(M) cadres in police uniform, along with about 3,000 cops, allegedly raided Nandigram and attacked the villagers from three sides. The then inspector general of police, Arun Gupta, along with superintendent of police Ganghi Srinivasan and additional superintendent of police Tanmay Roychowdhury, allegedly led the attack from one side where eleven people were killed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In another spot, two IPS officers, Satyajit Bandhopadhay and Debashish Baral, were allegedly present along with the officer-in-charge of Nandigram Shekhar Ray.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Acting on a PIL moved by Trinamool MP and advocate Kalyan Banerjee, the high court directed the CBI to probe the incident, but not file a charge sheet without its permission. Subsequently, the high court held the police firing &amp;quot;unconstitutional&amp;quot; and also ordered compensation to the deceased&#039;s family, rape victims and seriously injured persons.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Although the CPI(M) government paid compensation to the victims, it challenged the verdict in the Supreme Court. Subsequently, Mamata Banerjee withdrew the appeal from the apex court.&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 21504,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Bengal govt sits on CBI report in Nandigram case&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Hindustan Times
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Kolkata: &lt;/em&gt;The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on Thursday blamed the Mamata Banerjee government for not granting sanction for the prosecution of the state police and other state officials in the Nandigram police firing case during the CPI(M) regime in 2007.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Taking exception to the CBI&#039;s report, Justices Ashim Kumar Banerjee and Mrinal Kanti Chaudhuri directed the state to submit an action taken report on CBI&#039;s plea for granting sanction for prosecution of the erring police officials for hearing on June 21. The directive came on a petition filed by the family members of fourteen villagers, who were shot by policemen. Several women were also allegedly raped.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Asked by the court, the agency reported that it had concluded the probe and was ready to file a charge sheet, but was awaiting sanction from the state for prosecution of some police officials. The CBI reported that it had written to the state on December 5, 2012 and also clarified some points on April 17, 2013, but till date the state had not granted sanction.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The court had sought a CBI status report after advocate Rajdip Majumdar, representing the affected villagers, told the court that despite the passage of over six years the CBI had not filed a charge sheet in the Nandigram firing case.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Recently, the CBI reportedly submitted a report to the Mamata Banerjee government, giving a clean chit to former chief minister Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee in the case. The agency, however, reportedly indicted twelve top cops and government officials responsible for the firing without provocation from villagers. The agency also sought the state&#039;s permission to file a charge sheet against five cops. It also recommended a &amp;quot;major penalty&amp;quot; against the then district magistrate Anup Agarwal and five other officers.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The incident occurred on March 14, 2007 when armed CPI(M) cadres in police uniform, along with about 3,000 cops, allegedly raided Nandigram and attacked the villagers from three sides. The then inspector general of police, Arun Gupta, along with superintendent of police Ganghi Srinivasan and additional superintendent of police Tanmay Roychowdhury, allegedly led the attack from one side where eleven people were killed.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In another spot, two IPS officers, Satyajit Bandhopadhay and Debashish Baral, were allegedly present along with the officer-in-charge of Nandigram Shekhar Ray.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Acting on a PIL moved by Trinamool MP and advocate Kalyan Banerjee, the high court directed the CBI to probe the incident, but not file a charge sheet without its permission. Subsequently, the high court held the police firing &amp;quot;unconstitutional&amp;quot; and also ordered compensation to the deceased&#039;s family, rape victims and seriously injured persons.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Although the CPI(M) government paid compensation to the victims, it challenged the verdict in the Supreme Court. Subsequently, Mamata Banerjee withdrew the appeal from the apex court.
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindustan Times, 21 June, 2013, http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/Kolkata/Bengal-govt-sits-on-CBI-report-in-Nandigram-case/Article1-1079967.aspx&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;bengal-govt-sits-on-cbi-report-in-nandigram-case-21651&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 21651,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 21504
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Bengal govt sits on CBI report in Nandigram case&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;police,Law and Justice,Human Rights,Land Acquisition&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Hindustan Times



Kolkata: The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on Thursday blamed the Mamata Banerjee government for not granting sanction for the prosecution of the state police and other state officials in the Nandigram police firing case during the CPI(M)...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Hindustan Times&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Kolkata: &lt;/em&gt;The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on Thursday blamed the Mamata Banerjee government for not granting sanction for the prosecution of the state police and other state officials in the Nandigram police firing case during the CPI(M) regime in 2007.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Taking exception to the CBI&#039;s report, Justices Ashim Kumar Banerjee and Mrinal Kanti Chaudhuri directed the state to submit an action taken report on CBI&#039;s plea for granting sanction for prosecution of the erring police officials for hearing on June 21. The directive came on a petition filed by the family members of fourteen villagers, who were shot by policemen. Several women were also allegedly raped.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Asked by the court, the agency reported that it had concluded the probe and was ready to file a charge sheet, but was awaiting sanction from the state for prosecution of some police officials. The CBI reported that it had written to the state on December 5, 2012 and also clarified some points on April 17, 2013, but till date the state had not granted sanction.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The court had sought a CBI status report after advocate Rajdip Majumdar, representing the affected villagers, told the court that despite the passage of over six years the CBI had not filed a charge sheet in the Nandigram firing case.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Recently, the CBI reportedly submitted a report to the Mamata Banerjee government, giving a clean chit to former chief minister Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee in the case. The agency, however, reportedly indicted twelve top cops and government officials responsible for the firing without provocation from villagers. The agency also sought the state&#039;s permission to file a charge sheet against five cops. It also recommended a &amp;quot;major penalty&amp;quot; against the then district magistrate Anup Agarwal and five other officers.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The incident occurred on March 14, 2007 when armed CPI(M) cadres in police uniform, along with about 3,000 cops, allegedly raided Nandigram and attacked the villagers from three sides. The then inspector general of police, Arun Gupta, along with superintendent of police Ganghi Srinivasan and additional superintendent of police Tanmay Roychowdhury, allegedly led the attack from one side where eleven people were killed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In another spot, two IPS officers, Satyajit Bandhopadhay and Debashish Baral, were allegedly present along with the officer-in-charge of Nandigram Shekhar Ray.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Acting on a PIL moved by Trinamool MP and advocate Kalyan Banerjee, the high court directed the CBI to probe the incident, but not file a charge sheet without its permission. Subsequently, the high court held the police firing &amp;quot;unconstitutional&amp;quot; and also ordered compensation to the deceased&#039;s family, rape victims and seriously injured persons.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Although the CPI(M) government paid compensation to the victims, it challenged the verdict in the Supreme Court. Subsequently, Mamata Banerjee withdrew the appeal from the apex court.&lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/bengal-govt-sits-on-cbi-report-in-nandigram-case-21651.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Bengal govt sits on CBI report in Nandigram case | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Hindustan Times



Kolkata: The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on Thursday blamed the Mamata Banerjee government for not granting sanction for the prosecution of the state police and other state officials in the Nandigram police firing case during the CPI(M)..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Bengal govt sits on CBI report in Nandigram case</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Hindustan Times</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>Kolkata: </em>The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on Thursday blamed the Mamata Banerjee government for not granting sanction for the prosecution of the state police and other state officials in the Nandigram police firing case during the CPI(M) regime in 2007.</p><p align="justify">Taking exception to the CBI's report, Justices Ashim Kumar Banerjee and Mrinal Kanti Chaudhuri directed the state to submit an action taken report on CBI's plea for granting sanction for prosecution of the erring police officials for hearing on June 21. The directive came on a petition filed by the family members of fourteen villagers, who were shot by policemen. Several women were also allegedly raped.</p><p align="justify">Asked by the court, the agency reported that it had concluded the probe and was ready to file a charge sheet, but was awaiting sanction from the state for prosecution of some police officials. The CBI reported that it had written to the state on December 5, 2012 and also clarified some points on April 17, 2013, but till date the state had not granted sanction.</p><p align="justify">The court had sought a CBI status report after advocate Rajdip Majumdar, representing the affected villagers, told the court that despite the passage of over six years the CBI had not filed a charge sheet in the Nandigram firing case.</p><p align="justify">Recently, the CBI reportedly submitted a report to the Mamata Banerjee government, giving a clean chit to former chief minister Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee in the case. The agency, however, reportedly indicted twelve top cops and government officials responsible for the firing without provocation from villagers. The agency also sought the state's permission to file a charge sheet against five cops. It also recommended a &quot;major penalty&quot; against the then district magistrate Anup Agarwal and five other officers.</p><p align="justify">The incident occurred on March 14, 2007 when armed CPI(M) cadres in police uniform, along with about 3,000 cops, allegedly raided Nandigram and attacked the villagers from three sides. The then inspector general of police, Arun Gupta, along with superintendent of police Ganghi Srinivasan and additional superintendent of police Tanmay Roychowdhury, allegedly led the attack from one side where eleven people were killed.</p><p align="justify">In another spot, two IPS officers, Satyajit Bandhopadhay and Debashish Baral, were allegedly present along with the officer-in-charge of Nandigram Shekhar Ray.</p><p align="justify">Acting on a PIL moved by Trinamool MP and advocate Kalyan Banerjee, the high court directed the CBI to probe the incident, but not file a charge sheet without its permission. Subsequently, the high court held the police firing &quot;unconstitutional&quot; and also ordered compensation to the deceased's family, rape victims and seriously injured persons.</p><p align="justify">Although the CPI(M) government paid compensation to the victims, it challenged the verdict in the Supreme Court. Subsequently, Mamata Banerjee withdrew the appeal from the apex court.</p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680509e3226b6-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680509e3226b6-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680509e3226b6-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680509e3226b6-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680509e3226b6-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680509e3226b6-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680509e3226b6-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680509e3226b6-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680509e3226b6-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 21504,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Bengal govt sits on CBI report in Nandigram case&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Hindustan Times
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Kolkata: &lt;/em&gt;The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on Thursday blamed the Mamata Banerjee government for not granting sanction for the prosecution of the state police and other state officials in the Nandigram police firing case during the CPI(M) regime in 2007.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Taking exception to the CBI&#039;s report, Justices Ashim Kumar Banerjee and Mrinal Kanti Chaudhuri directed the state to submit an action taken report on CBI&#039;s plea for granting sanction for prosecution of the erring police officials for hearing on June 21. The directive came on a petition filed by the family members of fourteen villagers, who were shot by policemen. Several women were also allegedly raped.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Asked by the court, the agency reported that it had concluded the probe and was ready to file a charge sheet, but was awaiting sanction from the state for prosecution of some police officials. The CBI reported that it had written to the state on December 5, 2012 and also clarified some points on April 17, 2013, but till date the state had not granted sanction.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The court had sought a CBI status report after advocate Rajdip Majumdar, representing the affected villagers, told the court that despite the passage of over six years the CBI had not filed a charge sheet in the Nandigram firing case.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Recently, the CBI reportedly submitted a report to the Mamata Banerjee government, giving a clean chit to former chief minister Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee in the case. The agency, however, reportedly indicted twelve top cops and government officials responsible for the firing without provocation from villagers. The agency also sought the state&#039;s permission to file a charge sheet against five cops. It also recommended a &amp;quot;major penalty&amp;quot; against the then district magistrate Anup Agarwal and five other officers.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The incident occurred on March 14, 2007 when armed CPI(M) cadres in police uniform, along with about 3,000 cops, allegedly raided Nandigram and attacked the villagers from three sides. The then inspector general of police, Arun Gupta, along with superintendent of police Ganghi Srinivasan and additional superintendent of police Tanmay Roychowdhury, allegedly led the attack from one side where eleven people were killed.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In another spot, two IPS officers, Satyajit Bandhopadhay and Debashish Baral, were allegedly present along with the officer-in-charge of Nandigram Shekhar Ray.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Acting on a PIL moved by Trinamool MP and advocate Kalyan Banerjee, the high court directed the CBI to probe the incident, but not file a charge sheet without its permission. Subsequently, the high court held the police firing &amp;quot;unconstitutional&amp;quot; and also ordered compensation to the deceased&#039;s family, rape victims and seriously injured persons.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Although the CPI(M) government paid compensation to the victims, it challenged the verdict in the Supreme Court. Subsequently, Mamata Banerjee withdrew the appeal from the apex court.
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindustan Times, 21 June, 2013, http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/Kolkata/Bengal-govt-sits-on-CBI-report-in-Nandigram-case/Article1-1079967.aspx&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;bengal-govt-sits-on-cbi-report-in-nandigram-case-21651&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 21651,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 21504,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Bengal govt sits on CBI report in Nandigram case&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;police,Law and Justice,Human Rights,Land Acquisition&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Hindustan Times



Kolkata: The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on Thursday blamed the Mamata Banerjee government for not granting sanction for the prosecution of the state police and other state officials in the Nandigram police firing case during the CPI(M)...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Hindustan Times&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Kolkata: &lt;/em&gt;The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on Thursday blamed the Mamata Banerjee government for not granting sanction for the prosecution of the state police and other state officials in the Nandigram police firing case during the CPI(M) regime in 2007.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Taking exception to the CBI&#039;s report, Justices Ashim Kumar Banerjee and Mrinal Kanti Chaudhuri directed the state to submit an action taken report on CBI&#039;s plea for granting sanction for prosecution of the erring police officials for hearing on June 21. The directive came on a petition filed by the family members of fourteen villagers, who were shot by policemen. Several women were also allegedly raped.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Asked by the court, the agency reported that it had concluded the probe and was ready to file a charge sheet, but was awaiting sanction from the state for prosecution of some police officials. The CBI reported that it had written to the state on December 5, 2012 and also clarified some points on April 17, 2013, but till date the state had not granted sanction.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The court had sought a CBI status report after advocate Rajdip Majumdar, representing the affected villagers, told the court that despite the passage of over six years the CBI had not filed a charge sheet in the Nandigram firing case.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Recently, the CBI reportedly submitted a report to the Mamata Banerjee government, giving a clean chit to former chief minister Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee in the case. The agency, however, reportedly indicted twelve top cops and government officials responsible for the firing without provocation from villagers. The agency also sought the state&#039;s permission to file a charge sheet against five cops. It also recommended a &amp;quot;major penalty&amp;quot; against the then district magistrate Anup Agarwal and five other officers.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The incident occurred on March 14, 2007 when armed CPI(M) cadres in police uniform, along with about 3,000 cops, allegedly raided Nandigram and attacked the villagers from three sides. The then inspector general of police, Arun Gupta, along with superintendent of police Ganghi Srinivasan and additional superintendent of police Tanmay Roychowdhury, allegedly led the attack from one side where eleven people were killed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In another spot, two IPS officers, Satyajit Bandhopadhay and Debashish Baral, were allegedly present along with the officer-in-charge of Nandigram Shekhar Ray.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Acting on a PIL moved by Trinamool MP and advocate Kalyan Banerjee, the high court directed the CBI to probe the incident, but not file a charge sheet without its permission. Subsequently, the high court held the police firing &amp;quot;unconstitutional&amp;quot; and also ordered compensation to the deceased&#039;s family, rape victims and seriously injured persons.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Although the CPI(M) government paid compensation to the victims, it challenged the verdict in the Supreme Court. Subsequently, Mamata Banerjee withdrew the appeal from the apex court.&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 21504,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Bengal govt sits on CBI report in Nandigram case&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Hindustan Times
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Kolkata: &lt;/em&gt;The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on Thursday blamed the Mamata Banerjee government for not granting sanction for the prosecution of the state police and other state officials in the Nandigram police firing case during the CPI(M) regime in 2007.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Taking exception to the CBI&#039;s report, Justices Ashim Kumar Banerjee and Mrinal Kanti Chaudhuri directed the state to submit an action taken report on CBI&#039;s plea for granting sanction for prosecution of the erring police officials for hearing on June 21. The directive came on a petition filed by the family members of fourteen villagers, who were shot by policemen. Several women were also allegedly raped.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Asked by the court, the agency reported that it had concluded the probe and was ready to file a charge sheet, but was awaiting sanction from the state for prosecution of some police officials. The CBI reported that it had written to the state on December 5, 2012 and also clarified some points on April 17, 2013, but till date the state had not granted sanction.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The court had sought a CBI status report after advocate Rajdip Majumdar, representing the affected villagers, told the court that despite the passage of over six years the CBI had not filed a charge sheet in the Nandigram firing case.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Recently, the CBI reportedly submitted a report to the Mamata Banerjee government, giving a clean chit to former chief minister Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee in the case. The agency, however, reportedly indicted twelve top cops and government officials responsible for the firing without provocation from villagers. The agency also sought the state&#039;s permission to file a charge sheet against five cops. It also recommended a &amp;quot;major penalty&amp;quot; against the then district magistrate Anup Agarwal and five other officers.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The incident occurred on March 14, 2007 when armed CPI(M) cadres in police uniform, along with about 3,000 cops, allegedly raided Nandigram and attacked the villagers from three sides. The then inspector general of police, Arun Gupta, along with superintendent of police Ganghi Srinivasan and additional superintendent of police Tanmay Roychowdhury, allegedly led the attack from one side where eleven people were killed.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In another spot, two IPS officers, Satyajit Bandhopadhay and Debashish Baral, were allegedly present along with the officer-in-charge of Nandigram Shekhar Ray.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Acting on a PIL moved by Trinamool MP and advocate Kalyan Banerjee, the high court directed the CBI to probe the incident, but not file a charge sheet without its permission. Subsequently, the high court held the police firing &amp;quot;unconstitutional&amp;quot; and also ordered compensation to the deceased&#039;s family, rape victims and seriously injured persons.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Although the CPI(M) government paid compensation to the victims, it challenged the verdict in the Supreme Court. Subsequently, Mamata Banerjee withdrew the appeal from the apex court.
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindustan Times, 21 June, 2013, http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/Kolkata/Bengal-govt-sits-on-CBI-report-in-Nandigram-case/Article1-1079967.aspx&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;bengal-govt-sits-on-cbi-report-in-nandigram-case-21651&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 21651,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 21504
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Bengal govt sits on CBI report in Nandigram case&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;police,Law and Justice,Human Rights,Land Acquisition&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Hindustan Times



Kolkata: The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on Thursday blamed the Mamata Banerjee government for not granting sanction for the prosecution of the state police and other state officials in the Nandigram police firing case during the CPI(M)...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Hindustan Times&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Kolkata: &lt;/em&gt;The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on Thursday blamed the Mamata Banerjee government for not granting sanction for the prosecution of the state police and other state officials in the Nandigram police firing case during the CPI(M) regime in 2007.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Taking exception to the CBI&#039;s report, Justices Ashim Kumar Banerjee and Mrinal Kanti Chaudhuri directed the state to submit an action taken report on CBI&#039;s plea for granting sanction for prosecution of the erring police officials for hearing on June 21. The directive came on a petition filed by the family members of fourteen villagers, who were shot by policemen. Several women were also allegedly raped.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Asked by the court, the agency reported that it had concluded the probe and was ready to file a charge sheet, but was awaiting sanction from the state for prosecution of some police officials. The CBI reported that it had written to the state on December 5, 2012 and also clarified some points on April 17, 2013, but till date the state had not granted sanction.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The court had sought a CBI status report after advocate Rajdip Majumdar, representing the affected villagers, told the court that despite the passage of over six years the CBI had not filed a charge sheet in the Nandigram firing case.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Recently, the CBI reportedly submitted a report to the Mamata Banerjee government, giving a clean chit to former chief minister Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee in the case. The agency, however, reportedly indicted twelve top cops and government officials responsible for the firing without provocation from villagers. The agency also sought the state&#039;s permission to file a charge sheet against five cops. It also recommended a &amp;quot;major penalty&amp;quot; against the then district magistrate Anup Agarwal and five other officers.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The incident occurred on March 14, 2007 when armed CPI(M) cadres in police uniform, along with about 3,000 cops, allegedly raided Nandigram and attacked the villagers from three sides. The then inspector general of police, Arun Gupta, along with superintendent of police Ganghi Srinivasan and additional superintendent of police Tanmay Roychowdhury, allegedly led the attack from one side where eleven people were killed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In another spot, two IPS officers, Satyajit Bandhopadhay and Debashish Baral, were allegedly present along with the officer-in-charge of Nandigram Shekhar Ray.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Acting on a PIL moved by Trinamool MP and advocate Kalyan Banerjee, the high court directed the CBI to probe the incident, but not file a charge sheet without its permission. Subsequently, the high court held the police firing &amp;quot;unconstitutional&amp;quot; and also ordered compensation to the deceased&#039;s family, rape victims and seriously injured persons.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Although the CPI(M) government paid compensation to the victims, it challenged the verdict in the Supreme Court. Subsequently, Mamata Banerjee withdrew the appeal from the apex court.&lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/bengal-govt-sits-on-cbi-report-in-nandigram-case-21651.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Bengal govt sits on CBI report in Nandigram case | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Hindustan Times



Kolkata: The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on Thursday blamed the Mamata Banerjee government for not granting sanction for the prosecution of the state police and other state officials in the Nandigram police firing case during the CPI(M)..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Bengal govt sits on CBI report in Nandigram case</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Hindustan Times</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>Kolkata: </em>The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on Thursday blamed the Mamata Banerjee government for not granting sanction for the prosecution of the state police and other state officials in the Nandigram police firing case during the CPI(M) regime in 2007.</p><p align="justify">Taking exception to the CBI's report, Justices Ashim Kumar Banerjee and Mrinal Kanti Chaudhuri directed the state to submit an action taken report on CBI's plea for granting sanction for prosecution of the erring police officials for hearing on June 21. The directive came on a petition filed by the family members of fourteen villagers, who were shot by policemen. Several women were also allegedly raped.</p><p align="justify">Asked by the court, the agency reported that it had concluded the probe and was ready to file a charge sheet, but was awaiting sanction from the state for prosecution of some police officials. The CBI reported that it had written to the state on December 5, 2012 and also clarified some points on April 17, 2013, but till date the state had not granted sanction.</p><p align="justify">The court had sought a CBI status report after advocate Rajdip Majumdar, representing the affected villagers, told the court that despite the passage of over six years the CBI had not filed a charge sheet in the Nandigram firing case.</p><p align="justify">Recently, the CBI reportedly submitted a report to the Mamata Banerjee government, giving a clean chit to former chief minister Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee in the case. The agency, however, reportedly indicted twelve top cops and government officials responsible for the firing without provocation from villagers. The agency also sought the state's permission to file a charge sheet against five cops. It also recommended a &quot;major penalty&quot; against the then district magistrate Anup Agarwal and five other officers.</p><p align="justify">The incident occurred on March 14, 2007 when armed CPI(M) cadres in police uniform, along with about 3,000 cops, allegedly raided Nandigram and attacked the villagers from three sides. The then inspector general of police, Arun Gupta, along with superintendent of police Ganghi Srinivasan and additional superintendent of police Tanmay Roychowdhury, allegedly led the attack from one side where eleven people were killed.</p><p align="justify">In another spot, two IPS officers, Satyajit Bandhopadhay and Debashish Baral, were allegedly present along with the officer-in-charge of Nandigram Shekhar Ray.</p><p align="justify">Acting on a PIL moved by Trinamool MP and advocate Kalyan Banerjee, the high court directed the CBI to probe the incident, but not file a charge sheet without its permission. Subsequently, the high court held the police firing &quot;unconstitutional&quot; and also ordered compensation to the deceased's family, rape victims and seriously injured persons.</p><p align="justify">Although the CPI(M) government paid compensation to the victims, it challenged the verdict in the Supreme Court. Subsequently, Mamata Banerjee withdrew the appeal from the apex court.</p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680509e3226b6-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680509e3226b6-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680509e3226b6-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680509e3226b6-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680509e3226b6-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680509e3226b6-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680509e3226b6-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680509e3226b6-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680509e3226b6-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 21504,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Bengal govt sits on CBI report in Nandigram case&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Hindustan Times
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Kolkata: &lt;/em&gt;The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on Thursday blamed the Mamata Banerjee government for not granting sanction for the prosecution of the state police and other state officials in the Nandigram police firing case during the CPI(M) regime in 2007.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Taking exception to the CBI&#039;s report, Justices Ashim Kumar Banerjee and Mrinal Kanti Chaudhuri directed the state to submit an action taken report on CBI&#039;s plea for granting sanction for prosecution of the erring police officials for hearing on June 21. The directive came on a petition filed by the family members of fourteen villagers, who were shot by policemen. Several women were also allegedly raped.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Asked by the court, the agency reported that it had concluded the probe and was ready to file a charge sheet, but was awaiting sanction from the state for prosecution of some police officials. The CBI reported that it had written to the state on December 5, 2012 and also clarified some points on April 17, 2013, but till date the state had not granted sanction.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The court had sought a CBI status report after advocate Rajdip Majumdar, representing the affected villagers, told the court that despite the passage of over six years the CBI had not filed a charge sheet in the Nandigram firing case.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Recently, the CBI reportedly submitted a report to the Mamata Banerjee government, giving a clean chit to former chief minister Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee in the case. The agency, however, reportedly indicted twelve top cops and government officials responsible for the firing without provocation from villagers. The agency also sought the state&#039;s permission to file a charge sheet against five cops. It also recommended a &amp;quot;major penalty&amp;quot; against the then district magistrate Anup Agarwal and five other officers.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The incident occurred on March 14, 2007 when armed CPI(M) cadres in police uniform, along with about 3,000 cops, allegedly raided Nandigram and attacked the villagers from three sides. The then inspector general of police, Arun Gupta, along with superintendent of police Ganghi Srinivasan and additional superintendent of police Tanmay Roychowdhury, allegedly led the attack from one side where eleven people were killed.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In another spot, two IPS officers, Satyajit Bandhopadhay and Debashish Baral, were allegedly present along with the officer-in-charge of Nandigram Shekhar Ray.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Acting on a PIL moved by Trinamool MP and advocate Kalyan Banerjee, the high court directed the CBI to probe the incident, but not file a charge sheet without its permission. Subsequently, the high court held the police firing &amp;quot;unconstitutional&amp;quot; and also ordered compensation to the deceased&#039;s family, rape victims and seriously injured persons.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Although the CPI(M) government paid compensation to the victims, it challenged the verdict in the Supreme Court. Subsequently, Mamata Banerjee withdrew the appeal from the apex court.
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindustan Times, 21 June, 2013, http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/Kolkata/Bengal-govt-sits-on-CBI-report-in-Nandigram-case/Article1-1079967.aspx&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;bengal-govt-sits-on-cbi-report-in-nandigram-case-21651&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 21651,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 21504,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Bengal govt sits on CBI report in Nandigram case&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;police,Law and Justice,Human Rights,Land Acquisition&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Hindustan Times



Kolkata: The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on Thursday blamed the Mamata Banerjee government for not granting sanction for the prosecution of the state police and other state officials in the Nandigram police firing case during the CPI(M)...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Hindustan Times&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Kolkata: &lt;/em&gt;The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on Thursday blamed the Mamata Banerjee government for not granting sanction for the prosecution of the state police and other state officials in the Nandigram police firing case during the CPI(M) regime in 2007.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Taking exception to the CBI&#039;s report, Justices Ashim Kumar Banerjee and Mrinal Kanti Chaudhuri directed the state to submit an action taken report on CBI&#039;s plea for granting sanction for prosecution of the erring police officials for hearing on June 21. The directive came on a petition filed by the family members of fourteen villagers, who were shot by policemen. Several women were also allegedly raped.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Asked by the court, the agency reported that it had concluded the probe and was ready to file a charge sheet, but was awaiting sanction from the state for prosecution of some police officials. The CBI reported that it had written to the state on December 5, 2012 and also clarified some points on April 17, 2013, but till date the state had not granted sanction.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The court had sought a CBI status report after advocate Rajdip Majumdar, representing the affected villagers, told the court that despite the passage of over six years the CBI had not filed a charge sheet in the Nandigram firing case.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Recently, the CBI reportedly submitted a report to the Mamata Banerjee government, giving a clean chit to former chief minister Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee in the case. The agency, however, reportedly indicted twelve top cops and government officials responsible for the firing without provocation from villagers. The agency also sought the state&#039;s permission to file a charge sheet against five cops. It also recommended a &amp;quot;major penalty&amp;quot; against the then district magistrate Anup Agarwal and five other officers.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The incident occurred on March 14, 2007 when armed CPI(M) cadres in police uniform, along with about 3,000 cops, allegedly raided Nandigram and attacked the villagers from three sides. The then inspector general of police, Arun Gupta, along with superintendent of police Ganghi Srinivasan and additional superintendent of police Tanmay Roychowdhury, allegedly led the attack from one side where eleven people were killed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In another spot, two IPS officers, Satyajit Bandhopadhay and Debashish Baral, were allegedly present along with the officer-in-charge of Nandigram Shekhar Ray.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Acting on a PIL moved by Trinamool MP and advocate Kalyan Banerjee, the high court directed the CBI to probe the incident, but not file a charge sheet without its permission. Subsequently, the high court held the police firing &amp;quot;unconstitutional&amp;quot; and also ordered compensation to the deceased&#039;s family, rape victims and seriously injured persons.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Although the CPI(M) government paid compensation to the victims, it challenged the verdict in the Supreme Court. Subsequently, Mamata Banerjee withdrew the appeal from the apex court.&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 21504,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Bengal govt sits on CBI report in Nandigram case&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Hindustan Times
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Kolkata: &lt;/em&gt;The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on Thursday blamed the Mamata Banerjee government for not granting sanction for the prosecution of the state police and other state officials in the Nandigram police firing case during the CPI(M) regime in 2007.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Taking exception to the CBI&#039;s report, Justices Ashim Kumar Banerjee and Mrinal Kanti Chaudhuri directed the state to submit an action taken report on CBI&#039;s plea for granting sanction for prosecution of the erring police officials for hearing on June 21. The directive came on a petition filed by the family members of fourteen villagers, who were shot by policemen. Several women were also allegedly raped.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Asked by the court, the agency reported that it had concluded the probe and was ready to file a charge sheet, but was awaiting sanction from the state for prosecution of some police officials. The CBI reported that it had written to the state on December 5, 2012 and also clarified some points on April 17, 2013, but till date the state had not granted sanction.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The court had sought a CBI status report after advocate Rajdip Majumdar, representing the affected villagers, told the court that despite the passage of over six years the CBI had not filed a charge sheet in the Nandigram firing case.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Recently, the CBI reportedly submitted a report to the Mamata Banerjee government, giving a clean chit to former chief minister Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee in the case. The agency, however, reportedly indicted twelve top cops and government officials responsible for the firing without provocation from villagers. The agency also sought the state&#039;s permission to file a charge sheet against five cops. It also recommended a &amp;quot;major penalty&amp;quot; against the then district magistrate Anup Agarwal and five other officers.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The incident occurred on March 14, 2007 when armed CPI(M) cadres in police uniform, along with about 3,000 cops, allegedly raided Nandigram and attacked the villagers from three sides. The then inspector general of police, Arun Gupta, along with superintendent of police Ganghi Srinivasan and additional superintendent of police Tanmay Roychowdhury, allegedly led the attack from one side where eleven people were killed.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
In another spot, two IPS officers, Satyajit Bandhopadhay and Debashish Baral, were allegedly present along with the officer-in-charge of Nandigram Shekhar Ray.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Acting on a PIL moved by Trinamool MP and advocate Kalyan Banerjee, the high court directed the CBI to probe the incident, but not file a charge sheet without its permission. Subsequently, the high court held the police firing &amp;quot;unconstitutional&amp;quot; and also ordered compensation to the deceased&#039;s family, rape victims and seriously injured persons.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
Although the CPI(M) government paid compensation to the victims, it challenged the verdict in the Supreme Court. Subsequently, Mamata Banerjee withdrew the appeal from the apex court.
&lt;/p&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindustan Times, 21 June, 2013, http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/Kolkata/Bengal-govt-sits-on-CBI-report-in-Nandigram-case/Article1-1079967.aspx&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;bengal-govt-sits-on-cbi-report-in-nandigram-case-21651&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 21651,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 21504
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Bengal govt sits on CBI report in Nandigram case&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;police,Law and Justice,Human Rights,Land Acquisition&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Hindustan Times



Kolkata: The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on Thursday blamed the Mamata Banerjee government for not granting sanction for the prosecution of the state police and other state officials in the Nandigram police firing case during the CPI(M)...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Hindustan Times&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Kolkata: &lt;/em&gt;The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on Thursday blamed the Mamata Banerjee government for not granting sanction for the prosecution of the state police and other state officials in the Nandigram police firing case during the CPI(M) regime in 2007.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Taking exception to the CBI&#039;s report, Justices Ashim Kumar Banerjee and Mrinal Kanti Chaudhuri directed the state to submit an action taken report on CBI&#039;s plea for granting sanction for prosecution of the erring police officials for hearing on June 21. The directive came on a petition filed by the family members of fourteen villagers, who were shot by policemen. Several women were also allegedly raped.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Asked by the court, the agency reported that it had concluded the probe and was ready to file a charge sheet, but was awaiting sanction from the state for prosecution of some police officials. The CBI reported that it had written to the state on December 5, 2012 and also clarified some points on April 17, 2013, but till date the state had not granted sanction.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The court had sought a CBI status report after advocate Rajdip Majumdar, representing the affected villagers, told the court that despite the passage of over six years the CBI had not filed a charge sheet in the Nandigram firing case.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Recently, the CBI reportedly submitted a report to the Mamata Banerjee government, giving a clean chit to former chief minister Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee in the case. The agency, however, reportedly indicted twelve top cops and government officials responsible for the firing without provocation from villagers. The agency also sought the state&#039;s permission to file a charge sheet against five cops. It also recommended a &amp;quot;major penalty&amp;quot; against the then district magistrate Anup Agarwal and five other officers.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The incident occurred on March 14, 2007 when armed CPI(M) cadres in police uniform, along with about 3,000 cops, allegedly raided Nandigram and attacked the villagers from three sides. The then inspector general of police, Arun Gupta, along with superintendent of police Ganghi Srinivasan and additional superintendent of police Tanmay Roychowdhury, allegedly led the attack from one side where eleven people were killed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In another spot, two IPS officers, Satyajit Bandhopadhay and Debashish Baral, were allegedly present along with the officer-in-charge of Nandigram Shekhar Ray.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Acting on a PIL moved by Trinamool MP and advocate Kalyan Banerjee, the high court directed the CBI to probe the incident, but not file a charge sheet without its permission. Subsequently, the high court held the police firing &amp;quot;unconstitutional&amp;quot; and also ordered compensation to the deceased&#039;s family, rape victims and seriously injured persons.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Although the CPI(M) government paid compensation to the victims, it challenged the verdict in the Supreme Court. Subsequently, Mamata Banerjee withdrew the appeal from the apex court.&lt;/p&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/bengal-govt-sits-on-cbi-report-in-nandigram-case-21651.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Bengal govt sits on CBI report in Nandigram case | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Hindustan Times



Kolkata: The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on Thursday blamed the Mamata Banerjee government for not granting sanction for the prosecution of the state police and other state officials in the Nandigram police firing case during the CPI(M)..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Bengal govt sits on CBI report in Nandigram case</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Hindustan Times</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>Kolkata: </em>The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on Thursday blamed the Mamata Banerjee government for not granting sanction for the prosecution of the state police and other state officials in the Nandigram police firing case during the CPI(M) regime in 2007.</p><p align="justify">Taking exception to the CBI's report, Justices Ashim Kumar Banerjee and Mrinal Kanti Chaudhuri directed the state to submit an action taken report on CBI's plea for granting sanction for prosecution of the erring police officials for hearing on June 21. The directive came on a petition filed by the family members of fourteen villagers, who were shot by policemen. Several women were also allegedly raped.</p><p align="justify">Asked by the court, the agency reported that it had concluded the probe and was ready to file a charge sheet, but was awaiting sanction from the state for prosecution of some police officials. The CBI reported that it had written to the state on December 5, 2012 and also clarified some points on April 17, 2013, but till date the state had not granted sanction.</p><p align="justify">The court had sought a CBI status report after advocate Rajdip Majumdar, representing the affected villagers, told the court that despite the passage of over six years the CBI had not filed a charge sheet in the Nandigram firing case.</p><p align="justify">Recently, the CBI reportedly submitted a report to the Mamata Banerjee government, giving a clean chit to former chief minister Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee in the case. The agency, however, reportedly indicted twelve top cops and government officials responsible for the firing without provocation from villagers. The agency also sought the state's permission to file a charge sheet against five cops. It also recommended a &quot;major penalty&quot; against the then district magistrate Anup Agarwal and five other officers.</p><p align="justify">The incident occurred on March 14, 2007 when armed CPI(M) cadres in police uniform, along with about 3,000 cops, allegedly raided Nandigram and attacked the villagers from three sides. The then inspector general of police, Arun Gupta, along with superintendent of police Ganghi Srinivasan and additional superintendent of police Tanmay Roychowdhury, allegedly led the attack from one side where eleven people were killed.</p><p align="justify">In another spot, two IPS officers, Satyajit Bandhopadhay and Debashish Baral, were allegedly present along with the officer-in-charge of Nandigram Shekhar Ray.</p><p align="justify">Acting on a PIL moved by Trinamool MP and advocate Kalyan Banerjee, the high court directed the CBI to probe the incident, but not file a charge sheet without its permission. Subsequently, the high court held the police firing &quot;unconstitutional&quot; and also ordered compensation to the deceased's family, rape victims and seriously injured persons.</p><p align="justify">Although the CPI(M) government paid compensation to the victims, it challenged the verdict in the Supreme Court. Subsequently, Mamata Banerjee withdrew the appeal from the apex court.</p>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 21504,
		'title' => 'Bengal govt sits on CBI report in Nandigram case',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Hindustan Times
</div>
<p align="justify">
<br />
<em>Kolkata: </em>The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on Thursday blamed the Mamata Banerjee government for not granting sanction for the prosecution of the state police and other state officials in the Nandigram police firing case during the CPI(M) regime in 2007.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Taking exception to the CBI's report, Justices Ashim Kumar Banerjee and Mrinal Kanti Chaudhuri directed the state to submit an action taken report on CBI's plea for granting sanction for prosecution of the erring police officials for hearing on June 21. The directive came on a petition filed by the family members of fourteen villagers, who were shot by policemen. Several women were also allegedly raped.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Asked by the court, the agency reported that it had concluded the probe and was ready to file a charge sheet, but was awaiting sanction from the state for prosecution of some police officials. The CBI reported that it had written to the state on December 5, 2012 and also clarified some points on April 17, 2013, but till date the state had not granted sanction.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The court had sought a CBI status report after advocate Rajdip Majumdar, representing the affected villagers, told the court that despite the passage of over six years the CBI had not filed a charge sheet in the Nandigram firing case.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Recently, the CBI reportedly submitted a report to the Mamata Banerjee government, giving a clean chit to former chief minister Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee in the case. The agency, however, reportedly indicted twelve top cops and government officials responsible for the firing without provocation from villagers. The agency also sought the state's permission to file a charge sheet against five cops. It also recommended a &quot;major penalty&quot; against the then district magistrate Anup Agarwal and five other officers.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The incident occurred on March 14, 2007 when armed CPI(M) cadres in police uniform, along with about 3,000 cops, allegedly raided Nandigram and attacked the villagers from three sides. The then inspector general of police, Arun Gupta, along with superintendent of police Ganghi Srinivasan and additional superintendent of police Tanmay Roychowdhury, allegedly led the attack from one side where eleven people were killed.
</p>
<p align="justify">
In another spot, two IPS officers, Satyajit Bandhopadhay and Debashish Baral, were allegedly present along with the officer-in-charge of Nandigram Shekhar Ray.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Acting on a PIL moved by Trinamool MP and advocate Kalyan Banerjee, the high court directed the CBI to probe the incident, but not file a charge sheet without its permission. Subsequently, the high court held the police firing &quot;unconstitutional&quot; and also ordered compensation to the deceased's family, rape victims and seriously injured persons.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Although the CPI(M) government paid compensation to the victims, it challenged the verdict in the Supreme Court. Subsequently, Mamata Banerjee withdrew the appeal from the apex court.
</p>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Hindustan Times, 21 June, 2013, http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/Kolkata/Bengal-govt-sits-on-CBI-report-in-Nandigram-case/Article1-1079967.aspx',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'bengal-govt-sits-on-cbi-report-in-nandigram-case-21651',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 21651,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 21504,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Bengal govt sits on CBI report in Nandigram case',
	'metaKeywords' => 'police,Law and Justice,Human Rights,Land Acquisition',
	'metaDesc' => '
-The Hindustan Times



Kolkata: The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on Thursday blamed the Mamata Banerjee government for not granting sanction for the prosecution of the state police and other state officials in the Nandigram police firing case during the CPI(M)...',
	'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Hindustan Times</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>Kolkata: </em>The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on Thursday blamed the Mamata Banerjee government for not granting sanction for the prosecution of the state police and other state officials in the Nandigram police firing case during the CPI(M) regime in 2007.</p><p align="justify">Taking exception to the CBI's report, Justices Ashim Kumar Banerjee and Mrinal Kanti Chaudhuri directed the state to submit an action taken report on CBI's plea for granting sanction for prosecution of the erring police officials for hearing on June 21. The directive came on a petition filed by the family members of fourteen villagers, who were shot by policemen. Several women were also allegedly raped.</p><p align="justify">Asked by the court, the agency reported that it had concluded the probe and was ready to file a charge sheet, but was awaiting sanction from the state for prosecution of some police officials. The CBI reported that it had written to the state on December 5, 2012 and also clarified some points on April 17, 2013, but till date the state had not granted sanction.</p><p align="justify">The court had sought a CBI status report after advocate Rajdip Majumdar, representing the affected villagers, told the court that despite the passage of over six years the CBI had not filed a charge sheet in the Nandigram firing case.</p><p align="justify">Recently, the CBI reportedly submitted a report to the Mamata Banerjee government, giving a clean chit to former chief minister Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee in the case. The agency, however, reportedly indicted twelve top cops and government officials responsible for the firing without provocation from villagers. The agency also sought the state's permission to file a charge sheet against five cops. It also recommended a &quot;major penalty&quot; against the then district magistrate Anup Agarwal and five other officers.</p><p align="justify">The incident occurred on March 14, 2007 when armed CPI(M) cadres in police uniform, along with about 3,000 cops, allegedly raided Nandigram and attacked the villagers from three sides. The then inspector general of police, Arun Gupta, along with superintendent of police Ganghi Srinivasan and additional superintendent of police Tanmay Roychowdhury, allegedly led the attack from one side where eleven people were killed.</p><p align="justify">In another spot, two IPS officers, Satyajit Bandhopadhay and Debashish Baral, were allegedly present along with the officer-in-charge of Nandigram Shekhar Ray.</p><p align="justify">Acting on a PIL moved by Trinamool MP and advocate Kalyan Banerjee, the high court directed the CBI to probe the incident, but not file a charge sheet without its permission. Subsequently, the high court held the police firing &quot;unconstitutional&quot; and also ordered compensation to the deceased's family, rape victims and seriously injured persons.</p><p align="justify">Although the CPI(M) government paid compensation to the victims, it challenged the verdict in the Supreme Court. Subsequently, Mamata Banerjee withdrew the appeal from the apex court.</p>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 21504,
	'title' => 'Bengal govt sits on CBI report in Nandigram case',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Hindustan Times
</div>
<p align="justify">
<br />
<em>Kolkata: </em>The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on Thursday blamed the Mamata Banerjee government for not granting sanction for the prosecution of the state police and other state officials in the Nandigram police firing case during the CPI(M) regime in 2007.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Taking exception to the CBI's report, Justices Ashim Kumar Banerjee and Mrinal Kanti Chaudhuri directed the state to submit an action taken report on CBI's plea for granting sanction for prosecution of the erring police officials for hearing on June 21. The directive came on a petition filed by the family members of fourteen villagers, who were shot by policemen. Several women were also allegedly raped.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Asked by the court, the agency reported that it had concluded the probe and was ready to file a charge sheet, but was awaiting sanction from the state for prosecution of some police officials. The CBI reported that it had written to the state on December 5, 2012 and also clarified some points on April 17, 2013, but till date the state had not granted sanction.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The court had sought a CBI status report after advocate Rajdip Majumdar, representing the affected villagers, told the court that despite the passage of over six years the CBI had not filed a charge sheet in the Nandigram firing case.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Recently, the CBI reportedly submitted a report to the Mamata Banerjee government, giving a clean chit to former chief minister Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee in the case. The agency, however, reportedly indicted twelve top cops and government officials responsible for the firing without provocation from villagers. The agency also sought the state's permission to file a charge sheet against five cops. It also recommended a &quot;major penalty&quot; against the then district magistrate Anup Agarwal and five other officers.
</p>
<p align="justify">
The incident occurred on March 14, 2007 when armed CPI(M) cadres in police uniform, along with about 3,000 cops, allegedly raided Nandigram and attacked the villagers from three sides. The then inspector general of police, Arun Gupta, along with superintendent of police Ganghi Srinivasan and additional superintendent of police Tanmay Roychowdhury, allegedly led the attack from one side where eleven people were killed.
</p>
<p align="justify">
In another spot, two IPS officers, Satyajit Bandhopadhay and Debashish Baral, were allegedly present along with the officer-in-charge of Nandigram Shekhar Ray.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Acting on a PIL moved by Trinamool MP and advocate Kalyan Banerjee, the high court directed the CBI to probe the incident, but not file a charge sheet without its permission. Subsequently, the high court held the police firing &quot;unconstitutional&quot; and also ordered compensation to the deceased's family, rape victims and seriously injured persons.
</p>
<p align="justify">
Although the CPI(M) government paid compensation to the victims, it challenged the verdict in the Supreme Court. Subsequently, Mamata Banerjee withdrew the appeal from the apex court.
</p>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Hindustan Times, 21 June, 2013, http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/Kolkata/Bengal-govt-sits-on-CBI-report-in-Nandigram-case/Article1-1079967.aspx',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'bengal-govt-sits-on-cbi-report-in-nandigram-case-21651',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 21651,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 21504
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Bengal govt sits on CBI report in Nandigram case'
$metaKeywords = 'police,Law and Justice,Human Rights,Land Acquisition'
$metaDesc = '
-The Hindustan Times



Kolkata: The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on Thursday blamed the Mamata Banerjee government for not granting sanction for the prosecution of the state police and other state officials in the Nandigram police firing case during the CPI(M)...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-The Hindustan Times</div><p align="justify"><br /><em>Kolkata: </em>The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on Thursday blamed the Mamata Banerjee government for not granting sanction for the prosecution of the state police and other state officials in the Nandigram police firing case during the CPI(M) regime in 2007.</p><p align="justify">Taking exception to the CBI's report, Justices Ashim Kumar Banerjee and Mrinal Kanti Chaudhuri directed the state to submit an action taken report on CBI's plea for granting sanction for prosecution of the erring police officials for hearing on June 21. The directive came on a petition filed by the family members of fourteen villagers, who were shot by policemen. Several women were also allegedly raped.</p><p align="justify">Asked by the court, the agency reported that it had concluded the probe and was ready to file a charge sheet, but was awaiting sanction from the state for prosecution of some police officials. The CBI reported that it had written to the state on December 5, 2012 and also clarified some points on April 17, 2013, but till date the state had not granted sanction.</p><p align="justify">The court had sought a CBI status report after advocate Rajdip Majumdar, representing the affected villagers, told the court that despite the passage of over six years the CBI had not filed a charge sheet in the Nandigram firing case.</p><p align="justify">Recently, the CBI reportedly submitted a report to the Mamata Banerjee government, giving a clean chit to former chief minister Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee in the case. The agency, however, reportedly indicted twelve top cops and government officials responsible for the firing without provocation from villagers. The agency also sought the state's permission to file a charge sheet against five cops. It also recommended a &quot;major penalty&quot; against the then district magistrate Anup Agarwal and five other officers.</p><p align="justify">The incident occurred on March 14, 2007 when armed CPI(M) cadres in police uniform, along with about 3,000 cops, allegedly raided Nandigram and attacked the villagers from three sides. The then inspector general of police, Arun Gupta, along with superintendent of police Ganghi Srinivasan and additional superintendent of police Tanmay Roychowdhury, allegedly led the attack from one side where eleven people were killed.</p><p align="justify">In another spot, two IPS officers, Satyajit Bandhopadhay and Debashish Baral, were allegedly present along with the officer-in-charge of Nandigram Shekhar Ray.</p><p align="justify">Acting on a PIL moved by Trinamool MP and advocate Kalyan Banerjee, the high court directed the CBI to probe the incident, but not file a charge sheet without its permission. Subsequently, the high court held the police firing &quot;unconstitutional&quot; and also ordered compensation to the deceased's family, rape victims and seriously injured persons.</p><p align="justify">Although the CPI(M) government paid compensation to the victims, it challenged the verdict in the Supreme Court. Subsequently, Mamata Banerjee withdrew the appeal from the apex court.</p>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

Bengal govt sits on CBI report in Nandigram case

-The Hindustan Times Kolkata: The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on Thursday blamed the Mamata Banerjee government for not granting sanction for the prosecution of the state police and other state officials in the Nandigram police firing case during the CPI(M) regime in 2007. Taking exception to the CBI's report, Justices Ashim Kumar Banerjee and Mrinal Kanti Chaudhuri directed the state to submit an action taken report on CBI's plea for granting sanction for prosecution of the erring police officials for hearing on June 21. The directive came on a petition filed by the family members of fourteen villagers, who were shot by policemen. Several women were also allegedly raped. Asked by the court, the agency reported that it had concluded the probe and was ready to file a charge sheet, but was awaiting sanction from the state for prosecution of some police officials. The CBI reported that it had written to the state on December 5, 2012 and also clarified some points on April 17, 2013, but till date the state had not granted sanction. The court had sought a CBI status report after advocate Rajdip Majumdar, representing the affected villagers, told the court that despite the passage of over six years the CBI had not filed a charge sheet in the Nandigram firing case. Recently, the CBI reportedly submitted a report to the Mamata Banerjee government, giving a clean chit to former chief minister Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee in the case. The agency, however, reportedly indicted twelve top cops and government officials responsible for the firing without provocation from villagers. The agency also sought the state's permission to file a charge sheet against five cops. It also recommended a "major penalty" against the then district magistrate Anup Agarwal and five other officers. The incident occurred on March 14, 2007 when armed CPI(M) cadres in police uniform, along with about 3,000 cops, allegedly raided Nandigram and attacked the villagers from three sides. The then inspector general of police, Arun Gupta, along with superintendent of police Ganghi Srinivasan and additional superintendent of police Tanmay Roychowdhury, allegedly led the attack from one side where eleven people were killed. In another spot, two IPS officers, Satyajit Bandhopadhay and Debashish Baral, were allegedly present along with the officer-in-charge of Nandigram Shekhar Ray. Acting on a PIL moved by Trinamool MP and advocate Kalyan Banerjee, the high court directed the CBI to probe the incident, but not file a charge sheet without its permission. Subsequently, the high court held the police firing "unconstitutional" and also ordered compensation to the deceased's family, rape victims and seriously injured persons. Although the CPI(M) government paid compensation to the victims, it challenged the verdict in the Supreme Court. Subsequently, Mamata Banerjee withdrew the appeal from the apex court.