Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/bin-aadhaar-plea-govt-4679317/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/bin-aadhaar-plea-govt-4679317/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/bin-aadhaar-plea-govt-4679317/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/bin-aadhaar-plea-govt-4679317/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f131ffd1a6a-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f131ffd1a6a-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f131ffd1a6a-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f131ffd1a6a-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f131ffd1a6a-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f131ffd1a6a-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f131ffd1a6a-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f131ffd1a6a-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f131ffd1a6a-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 31249,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Bin Aadhaar plea: Govt&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The Centre today urged the Supreme Court to dismiss Congress Rajya Sabha member Jairam Ramesh&#039;s petition challenging the Aadhaar law, contending that an act passed by Parliament was immune from judicial challenge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The fact is that the law has been passed as a money bill and the Speaker has confirmed it. It is immune from any judicial challenge,&amp;quot; attorney-general Mukul Rohatgi told a bench headed by Chief Justice T.S. Thakur.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ramesh has said that the Lok Sabha passing the legislation as a money bill &amp;quot;was inappropriate and there was no discussion on it in the upper House&amp;quot;. The Rajya Sabha has no powers to block a money bill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ramesh has contended that the government&#039;s move to rush through the legislation without proper discussion in the Rajya Sabha violated his fundamental right as the law, meant for better targeting of subsidies, involved an individual&#039;s right to privacy as Aadhaar used biometric data.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;It is not known how the petitioner&#039;s fundamental right is violated. There is no description in the petition on this account,&amp;quot; Rohatgi told the bench, also comprising Justices R. Banumathi and U.U. Lalit, during a brief hearing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rohatgi questioned the maintainability of Ramesh&#039;s plea saying no fundamental right of the leader had been violated as the bill was passed by a majority in the lower House, and asked for the petition to be dismissed at the threshold.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ramesh&#039;s counsel, senior advocate and former Union minister P. Chidambaram, however, said the matter should be heard as the manner in which the Lok Sabha passed the legislation violated a member&#039;s fundamental right to participate in a discussion in the upper House.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Parliament has violated the basic rule of law which is enshrined in our Constitution. The Rajya Sabha has the right to debate this. But this right was taken away,&amp;quot; Chidambaram told the court.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although Ramesh had raised several objections and proposed amendments to the bill, they were rejected by the chairman of the upper House, Chidambaram said. &amp;quot;But the chairman said he does not have the power (to consider the points mentioned by Ramesh) because the Speaker of the lower House had certified it.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chidambaram contended that both Houses of Parliament had equal rights and the court should not dismiss the petition on the ground that Ramesh had no locus standi.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court, however, asked Ramesh and the Centre to file written submissions and posted the plea for further hearing on July 20.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 11 May, 2016, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1160511/jsp/nation/story_84967.jsp#.VzKcwiH3-ho&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;bin-aadhaar-plea-govt-4679317&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4679317,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 31249,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Bin Aadhaar plea: Govt&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Money Bill,aadhaar,uid,UIDAI&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: The Centre today urged the Supreme Court to dismiss Congress Rajya Sabha member Jairam Ramesh&#039;s petition challenging the Aadhaar law, contending that an act passed by Parliament was immune from judicial challenge.

&amp;quot;The fact is that the law...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The Centre today urged the Supreme Court to dismiss Congress Rajya Sabha member Jairam Ramesh&#039;s petition challenging the Aadhaar law, contending that an act passed by Parliament was immune from judicial challenge.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;The fact is that the law has been passed as a money bill and the Speaker has confirmed it. It is immune from any judicial challenge,&amp;quot; attorney-general Mukul Rohatgi told a bench headed by Chief Justice T.S. Thakur.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Ramesh has said that the Lok Sabha passing the legislation as a money bill &amp;quot;was inappropriate and there was no discussion on it in the upper House&amp;quot;. The Rajya Sabha has no powers to block a money bill.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Ramesh has contended that the government&#039;s move to rush through the legislation without proper discussion in the Rajya Sabha violated his fundamental right as the law, meant for better targeting of subsidies, involved an individual&#039;s right to privacy as Aadhaar used biometric data.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;It is not known how the petitioner&#039;s fundamental right is violated. There is no description in the petition on this account,&amp;quot; Rohatgi told the bench, also comprising Justices R. Banumathi and U.U. Lalit, during a brief hearing.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Rohatgi questioned the maintainability of Ramesh&#039;s plea saying no fundamental right of the leader had been violated as the bill was passed by a majority in the lower House, and asked for the petition to be dismissed at the threshold.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Ramesh&#039;s counsel, senior advocate and former Union minister P. Chidambaram, however, said the matter should be heard as the manner in which the Lok Sabha passed the legislation violated a member&#039;s fundamental right to participate in a discussion in the upper House.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Parliament has violated the basic rule of law which is enshrined in our Constitution. The Rajya Sabha has the right to debate this. But this right was taken away,&amp;quot; Chidambaram told the court.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Although Ramesh had raised several objections and proposed amendments to the bill, they were rejected by the chairman of the upper House, Chidambaram said. &amp;quot;But the chairman said he does not have the power (to consider the points mentioned by Ramesh) because the Speaker of the lower House had certified it.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Chidambaram contended that both Houses of Parliament had equal rights and the court should not dismiss the petition on the ground that Ramesh had no locus standi.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court, however, asked Ramesh and the Centre to file written submissions and posted the plea for further hearing on July 20.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 31249,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Bin Aadhaar plea: Govt&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The Centre today urged the Supreme Court to dismiss Congress Rajya Sabha member Jairam Ramesh&#039;s petition challenging the Aadhaar law, contending that an act passed by Parliament was immune from judicial challenge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The fact is that the law has been passed as a money bill and the Speaker has confirmed it. It is immune from any judicial challenge,&amp;quot; attorney-general Mukul Rohatgi told a bench headed by Chief Justice T.S. Thakur.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ramesh has said that the Lok Sabha passing the legislation as a money bill &amp;quot;was inappropriate and there was no discussion on it in the upper House&amp;quot;. The Rajya Sabha has no powers to block a money bill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ramesh has contended that the government&#039;s move to rush through the legislation without proper discussion in the Rajya Sabha violated his fundamental right as the law, meant for better targeting of subsidies, involved an individual&#039;s right to privacy as Aadhaar used biometric data.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;It is not known how the petitioner&#039;s fundamental right is violated. There is no description in the petition on this account,&amp;quot; Rohatgi told the bench, also comprising Justices R. Banumathi and U.U. Lalit, during a brief hearing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rohatgi questioned the maintainability of Ramesh&#039;s plea saying no fundamental right of the leader had been violated as the bill was passed by a majority in the lower House, and asked for the petition to be dismissed at the threshold.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ramesh&#039;s counsel, senior advocate and former Union minister P. Chidambaram, however, said the matter should be heard as the manner in which the Lok Sabha passed the legislation violated a member&#039;s fundamental right to participate in a discussion in the upper House.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Parliament has violated the basic rule of law which is enshrined in our Constitution. The Rajya Sabha has the right to debate this. But this right was taken away,&amp;quot; Chidambaram told the court.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although Ramesh had raised several objections and proposed amendments to the bill, they were rejected by the chairman of the upper House, Chidambaram said. &amp;quot;But the chairman said he does not have the power (to consider the points mentioned by Ramesh) because the Speaker of the lower House had certified it.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chidambaram contended that both Houses of Parliament had equal rights and the court should not dismiss the petition on the ground that Ramesh had no locus standi.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court, however, asked Ramesh and the Centre to file written submissions and posted the plea for further hearing on July 20.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 11 May, 2016, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1160511/jsp/nation/story_84967.jsp#.VzKcwiH3-ho&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;bin-aadhaar-plea-govt-4679317&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4679317,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 31249
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Bin Aadhaar plea: Govt&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Money Bill,aadhaar,uid,UIDAI&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: The Centre today urged the Supreme Court to dismiss Congress Rajya Sabha member Jairam Ramesh&#039;s petition challenging the Aadhaar law, contending that an act passed by Parliament was immune from judicial challenge.

&amp;quot;The fact is that the law...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The Centre today urged the Supreme Court to dismiss Congress Rajya Sabha member Jairam Ramesh&#039;s petition challenging the Aadhaar law, contending that an act passed by Parliament was immune from judicial challenge.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;The fact is that the law has been passed as a money bill and the Speaker has confirmed it. It is immune from any judicial challenge,&amp;quot; attorney-general Mukul Rohatgi told a bench headed by Chief Justice T.S. Thakur.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Ramesh has said that the Lok Sabha passing the legislation as a money bill &amp;quot;was inappropriate and there was no discussion on it in the upper House&amp;quot;. The Rajya Sabha has no powers to block a money bill.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Ramesh has contended that the government&#039;s move to rush through the legislation without proper discussion in the Rajya Sabha violated his fundamental right as the law, meant for better targeting of subsidies, involved an individual&#039;s right to privacy as Aadhaar used biometric data.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;It is not known how the petitioner&#039;s fundamental right is violated. There is no description in the petition on this account,&amp;quot; Rohatgi told the bench, also comprising Justices R. Banumathi and U.U. Lalit, during a brief hearing.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Rohatgi questioned the maintainability of Ramesh&#039;s plea saying no fundamental right of the leader had been violated as the bill was passed by a majority in the lower House, and asked for the petition to be dismissed at the threshold.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Ramesh&#039;s counsel, senior advocate and former Union minister P. Chidambaram, however, said the matter should be heard as the manner in which the Lok Sabha passed the legislation violated a member&#039;s fundamental right to participate in a discussion in the upper House.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Parliament has violated the basic rule of law which is enshrined in our Constitution. The Rajya Sabha has the right to debate this. But this right was taken away,&amp;quot; Chidambaram told the court.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Although Ramesh had raised several objections and proposed amendments to the bill, they were rejected by the chairman of the upper House, Chidambaram said. &amp;quot;But the chairman said he does not have the power (to consider the points mentioned by Ramesh) because the Speaker of the lower House had certified it.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Chidambaram contended that both Houses of Parliament had equal rights and the court should not dismiss the petition on the ground that Ramesh had no locus standi.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court, however, asked Ramesh and the Centre to file written submissions and posted the plea for further hearing on July 20.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/bin-aadhaar-plea-govt-4679317.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Bin Aadhaar plea: Govt | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: The Centre today urged the Supreme Court to dismiss Congress Rajya Sabha member Jairam Ramesh's petition challenging the Aadhaar law, contending that an act passed by Parliament was immune from judicial challenge.

&quot;The fact is that the law..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Bin Aadhaar plea: Govt</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>The Centre today urged the Supreme Court to dismiss Congress Rajya Sabha member Jairam Ramesh's petition challenging the Aadhaar law, contending that an act passed by Parliament was immune from judicial challenge.<br /><br />&quot;The fact is that the law has been passed as a money bill and the Speaker has confirmed it. It is immune from any judicial challenge,&quot; attorney-general Mukul Rohatgi told a bench headed by Chief Justice T.S. Thakur.<br /><br />Ramesh has said that the Lok Sabha passing the legislation as a money bill &quot;was inappropriate and there was no discussion on it in the upper House&quot;. The Rajya Sabha has no powers to block a money bill.<br /><br />Ramesh has contended that the government's move to rush through the legislation without proper discussion in the Rajya Sabha violated his fundamental right as the law, meant for better targeting of subsidies, involved an individual's right to privacy as Aadhaar used biometric data.<br /><br />&quot;It is not known how the petitioner's fundamental right is violated. There is no description in the petition on this account,&quot; Rohatgi told the bench, also comprising Justices R. Banumathi and U.U. Lalit, during a brief hearing.<br /><br />Rohatgi questioned the maintainability of Ramesh's plea saying no fundamental right of the leader had been violated as the bill was passed by a majority in the lower House, and asked for the petition to be dismissed at the threshold.<br /><br />Ramesh's counsel, senior advocate and former Union minister P. Chidambaram, however, said the matter should be heard as the manner in which the Lok Sabha passed the legislation violated a member's fundamental right to participate in a discussion in the upper House.<br /><br />&quot;Parliament has violated the basic rule of law which is enshrined in our Constitution. The Rajya Sabha has the right to debate this. But this right was taken away,&quot; Chidambaram told the court.<br /><br />Although Ramesh had raised several objections and proposed amendments to the bill, they were rejected by the chairman of the upper House, Chidambaram said. &quot;But the chairman said he does not have the power (to consider the points mentioned by Ramesh) because the Speaker of the lower House had certified it.&quot;<br /><br />Chidambaram contended that both Houses of Parliament had equal rights and the court should not dismiss the petition on the ground that Ramesh had no locus standi.<br /><br />The court, however, asked Ramesh and the Centre to file written submissions and posted the plea for further hearing on July 20.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f131ffd1a6a-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f131ffd1a6a-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f131ffd1a6a-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f131ffd1a6a-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f131ffd1a6a-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f131ffd1a6a-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f131ffd1a6a-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f131ffd1a6a-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f131ffd1a6a-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 31249,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Bin Aadhaar plea: Govt&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The Centre today urged the Supreme Court to dismiss Congress Rajya Sabha member Jairam Ramesh&#039;s petition challenging the Aadhaar law, contending that an act passed by Parliament was immune from judicial challenge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The fact is that the law has been passed as a money bill and the Speaker has confirmed it. It is immune from any judicial challenge,&amp;quot; attorney-general Mukul Rohatgi told a bench headed by Chief Justice T.S. Thakur.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ramesh has said that the Lok Sabha passing the legislation as a money bill &amp;quot;was inappropriate and there was no discussion on it in the upper House&amp;quot;. The Rajya Sabha has no powers to block a money bill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ramesh has contended that the government&#039;s move to rush through the legislation without proper discussion in the Rajya Sabha violated his fundamental right as the law, meant for better targeting of subsidies, involved an individual&#039;s right to privacy as Aadhaar used biometric data.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;It is not known how the petitioner&#039;s fundamental right is violated. There is no description in the petition on this account,&amp;quot; Rohatgi told the bench, also comprising Justices R. Banumathi and U.U. Lalit, during a brief hearing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rohatgi questioned the maintainability of Ramesh&#039;s plea saying no fundamental right of the leader had been violated as the bill was passed by a majority in the lower House, and asked for the petition to be dismissed at the threshold.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ramesh&#039;s counsel, senior advocate and former Union minister P. Chidambaram, however, said the matter should be heard as the manner in which the Lok Sabha passed the legislation violated a member&#039;s fundamental right to participate in a discussion in the upper House.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Parliament has violated the basic rule of law which is enshrined in our Constitution. The Rajya Sabha has the right to debate this. But this right was taken away,&amp;quot; Chidambaram told the court.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although Ramesh had raised several objections and proposed amendments to the bill, they were rejected by the chairman of the upper House, Chidambaram said. &amp;quot;But the chairman said he does not have the power (to consider the points mentioned by Ramesh) because the Speaker of the lower House had certified it.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chidambaram contended that both Houses of Parliament had equal rights and the court should not dismiss the petition on the ground that Ramesh had no locus standi.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court, however, asked Ramesh and the Centre to file written submissions and posted the plea for further hearing on July 20.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 11 May, 2016, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1160511/jsp/nation/story_84967.jsp#.VzKcwiH3-ho&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;bin-aadhaar-plea-govt-4679317&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4679317,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 31249,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Bin Aadhaar plea: Govt&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Money Bill,aadhaar,uid,UIDAI&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: The Centre today urged the Supreme Court to dismiss Congress Rajya Sabha member Jairam Ramesh&#039;s petition challenging the Aadhaar law, contending that an act passed by Parliament was immune from judicial challenge.

&amp;quot;The fact is that the law...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The Centre today urged the Supreme Court to dismiss Congress Rajya Sabha member Jairam Ramesh&#039;s petition challenging the Aadhaar law, contending that an act passed by Parliament was immune from judicial challenge.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;The fact is that the law has been passed as a money bill and the Speaker has confirmed it. It is immune from any judicial challenge,&amp;quot; attorney-general Mukul Rohatgi told a bench headed by Chief Justice T.S. Thakur.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Ramesh has said that the Lok Sabha passing the legislation as a money bill &amp;quot;was inappropriate and there was no discussion on it in the upper House&amp;quot;. The Rajya Sabha has no powers to block a money bill.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Ramesh has contended that the government&#039;s move to rush through the legislation without proper discussion in the Rajya Sabha violated his fundamental right as the law, meant for better targeting of subsidies, involved an individual&#039;s right to privacy as Aadhaar used biometric data.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;It is not known how the petitioner&#039;s fundamental right is violated. There is no description in the petition on this account,&amp;quot; Rohatgi told the bench, also comprising Justices R. Banumathi and U.U. Lalit, during a brief hearing.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Rohatgi questioned the maintainability of Ramesh&#039;s plea saying no fundamental right of the leader had been violated as the bill was passed by a majority in the lower House, and asked for the petition to be dismissed at the threshold.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Ramesh&#039;s counsel, senior advocate and former Union minister P. Chidambaram, however, said the matter should be heard as the manner in which the Lok Sabha passed the legislation violated a member&#039;s fundamental right to participate in a discussion in the upper House.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Parliament has violated the basic rule of law which is enshrined in our Constitution. The Rajya Sabha has the right to debate this. But this right was taken away,&amp;quot; Chidambaram told the court.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Although Ramesh had raised several objections and proposed amendments to the bill, they were rejected by the chairman of the upper House, Chidambaram said. &amp;quot;But the chairman said he does not have the power (to consider the points mentioned by Ramesh) because the Speaker of the lower House had certified it.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Chidambaram contended that both Houses of Parliament had equal rights and the court should not dismiss the petition on the ground that Ramesh had no locus standi.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court, however, asked Ramesh and the Centre to file written submissions and posted the plea for further hearing on July 20.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 31249,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Bin Aadhaar plea: Govt&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The Centre today urged the Supreme Court to dismiss Congress Rajya Sabha member Jairam Ramesh&#039;s petition challenging the Aadhaar law, contending that an act passed by Parliament was immune from judicial challenge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The fact is that the law has been passed as a money bill and the Speaker has confirmed it. It is immune from any judicial challenge,&amp;quot; attorney-general Mukul Rohatgi told a bench headed by Chief Justice T.S. Thakur.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ramesh has said that the Lok Sabha passing the legislation as a money bill &amp;quot;was inappropriate and there was no discussion on it in the upper House&amp;quot;. The Rajya Sabha has no powers to block a money bill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ramesh has contended that the government&#039;s move to rush through the legislation without proper discussion in the Rajya Sabha violated his fundamental right as the law, meant for better targeting of subsidies, involved an individual&#039;s right to privacy as Aadhaar used biometric data.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;It is not known how the petitioner&#039;s fundamental right is violated. There is no description in the petition on this account,&amp;quot; Rohatgi told the bench, also comprising Justices R. Banumathi and U.U. Lalit, during a brief hearing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rohatgi questioned the maintainability of Ramesh&#039;s plea saying no fundamental right of the leader had been violated as the bill was passed by a majority in the lower House, and asked for the petition to be dismissed at the threshold.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ramesh&#039;s counsel, senior advocate and former Union minister P. Chidambaram, however, said the matter should be heard as the manner in which the Lok Sabha passed the legislation violated a member&#039;s fundamental right to participate in a discussion in the upper House.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Parliament has violated the basic rule of law which is enshrined in our Constitution. The Rajya Sabha has the right to debate this. But this right was taken away,&amp;quot; Chidambaram told the court.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although Ramesh had raised several objections and proposed amendments to the bill, they were rejected by the chairman of the upper House, Chidambaram said. &amp;quot;But the chairman said he does not have the power (to consider the points mentioned by Ramesh) because the Speaker of the lower House had certified it.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chidambaram contended that both Houses of Parliament had equal rights and the court should not dismiss the petition on the ground that Ramesh had no locus standi.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court, however, asked Ramesh and the Centre to file written submissions and posted the plea for further hearing on July 20.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 11 May, 2016, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1160511/jsp/nation/story_84967.jsp#.VzKcwiH3-ho&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;bin-aadhaar-plea-govt-4679317&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4679317,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 31249
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Bin Aadhaar plea: Govt&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Money Bill,aadhaar,uid,UIDAI&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: The Centre today urged the Supreme Court to dismiss Congress Rajya Sabha member Jairam Ramesh&#039;s petition challenging the Aadhaar law, contending that an act passed by Parliament was immune from judicial challenge.

&amp;quot;The fact is that the law...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The Centre today urged the Supreme Court to dismiss Congress Rajya Sabha member Jairam Ramesh&#039;s petition challenging the Aadhaar law, contending that an act passed by Parliament was immune from judicial challenge.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;The fact is that the law has been passed as a money bill and the Speaker has confirmed it. It is immune from any judicial challenge,&amp;quot; attorney-general Mukul Rohatgi told a bench headed by Chief Justice T.S. Thakur.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Ramesh has said that the Lok Sabha passing the legislation as a money bill &amp;quot;was inappropriate and there was no discussion on it in the upper House&amp;quot;. The Rajya Sabha has no powers to block a money bill.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Ramesh has contended that the government&#039;s move to rush through the legislation without proper discussion in the Rajya Sabha violated his fundamental right as the law, meant for better targeting of subsidies, involved an individual&#039;s right to privacy as Aadhaar used biometric data.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;It is not known how the petitioner&#039;s fundamental right is violated. There is no description in the petition on this account,&amp;quot; Rohatgi told the bench, also comprising Justices R. Banumathi and U.U. Lalit, during a brief hearing.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Rohatgi questioned the maintainability of Ramesh&#039;s plea saying no fundamental right of the leader had been violated as the bill was passed by a majority in the lower House, and asked for the petition to be dismissed at the threshold.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Ramesh&#039;s counsel, senior advocate and former Union minister P. Chidambaram, however, said the matter should be heard as the manner in which the Lok Sabha passed the legislation violated a member&#039;s fundamental right to participate in a discussion in the upper House.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Parliament has violated the basic rule of law which is enshrined in our Constitution. The Rajya Sabha has the right to debate this. But this right was taken away,&amp;quot; Chidambaram told the court.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Although Ramesh had raised several objections and proposed amendments to the bill, they were rejected by the chairman of the upper House, Chidambaram said. &amp;quot;But the chairman said he does not have the power (to consider the points mentioned by Ramesh) because the Speaker of the lower House had certified it.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Chidambaram contended that both Houses of Parliament had equal rights and the court should not dismiss the petition on the ground that Ramesh had no locus standi.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court, however, asked Ramesh and the Centre to file written submissions and posted the plea for further hearing on July 20.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/bin-aadhaar-plea-govt-4679317.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Bin Aadhaar plea: Govt | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: The Centre today urged the Supreme Court to dismiss Congress Rajya Sabha member Jairam Ramesh's petition challenging the Aadhaar law, contending that an act passed by Parliament was immune from judicial challenge.

&quot;The fact is that the law..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Bin Aadhaar plea: Govt</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>The Centre today urged the Supreme Court to dismiss Congress Rajya Sabha member Jairam Ramesh's petition challenging the Aadhaar law, contending that an act passed by Parliament was immune from judicial challenge.<br /><br />&quot;The fact is that the law has been passed as a money bill and the Speaker has confirmed it. It is immune from any judicial challenge,&quot; attorney-general Mukul Rohatgi told a bench headed by Chief Justice T.S. Thakur.<br /><br />Ramesh has said that the Lok Sabha passing the legislation as a money bill &quot;was inappropriate and there was no discussion on it in the upper House&quot;. The Rajya Sabha has no powers to block a money bill.<br /><br />Ramesh has contended that the government's move to rush through the legislation without proper discussion in the Rajya Sabha violated his fundamental right as the law, meant for better targeting of subsidies, involved an individual's right to privacy as Aadhaar used biometric data.<br /><br />&quot;It is not known how the petitioner's fundamental right is violated. There is no description in the petition on this account,&quot; Rohatgi told the bench, also comprising Justices R. Banumathi and U.U. Lalit, during a brief hearing.<br /><br />Rohatgi questioned the maintainability of Ramesh's plea saying no fundamental right of the leader had been violated as the bill was passed by a majority in the lower House, and asked for the petition to be dismissed at the threshold.<br /><br />Ramesh's counsel, senior advocate and former Union minister P. Chidambaram, however, said the matter should be heard as the manner in which the Lok Sabha passed the legislation violated a member's fundamental right to participate in a discussion in the upper House.<br /><br />&quot;Parliament has violated the basic rule of law which is enshrined in our Constitution. The Rajya Sabha has the right to debate this. But this right was taken away,&quot; Chidambaram told the court.<br /><br />Although Ramesh had raised several objections and proposed amendments to the bill, they were rejected by the chairman of the upper House, Chidambaram said. &quot;But the chairman said he does not have the power (to consider the points mentioned by Ramesh) because the Speaker of the lower House had certified it.&quot;<br /><br />Chidambaram contended that both Houses of Parliament had equal rights and the court should not dismiss the petition on the ground that Ramesh had no locus standi.<br /><br />The court, however, asked Ramesh and the Centre to file written submissions and posted the plea for further hearing on July 20.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f131ffd1a6a-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f131ffd1a6a-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f131ffd1a6a-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f131ffd1a6a-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f131ffd1a6a-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f131ffd1a6a-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f131ffd1a6a-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f131ffd1a6a-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f131ffd1a6a-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 31249,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Bin Aadhaar plea: Govt&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The Centre today urged the Supreme Court to dismiss Congress Rajya Sabha member Jairam Ramesh&#039;s petition challenging the Aadhaar law, contending that an act passed by Parliament was immune from judicial challenge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The fact is that the law has been passed as a money bill and the Speaker has confirmed it. It is immune from any judicial challenge,&amp;quot; attorney-general Mukul Rohatgi told a bench headed by Chief Justice T.S. Thakur.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ramesh has said that the Lok Sabha passing the legislation as a money bill &amp;quot;was inappropriate and there was no discussion on it in the upper House&amp;quot;. The Rajya Sabha has no powers to block a money bill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ramesh has contended that the government&#039;s move to rush through the legislation without proper discussion in the Rajya Sabha violated his fundamental right as the law, meant for better targeting of subsidies, involved an individual&#039;s right to privacy as Aadhaar used biometric data.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;It is not known how the petitioner&#039;s fundamental right is violated. There is no description in the petition on this account,&amp;quot; Rohatgi told the bench, also comprising Justices R. Banumathi and U.U. Lalit, during a brief hearing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rohatgi questioned the maintainability of Ramesh&#039;s plea saying no fundamental right of the leader had been violated as the bill was passed by a majority in the lower House, and asked for the petition to be dismissed at the threshold.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ramesh&#039;s counsel, senior advocate and former Union minister P. Chidambaram, however, said the matter should be heard as the manner in which the Lok Sabha passed the legislation violated a member&#039;s fundamental right to participate in a discussion in the upper House.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Parliament has violated the basic rule of law which is enshrined in our Constitution. The Rajya Sabha has the right to debate this. But this right was taken away,&amp;quot; Chidambaram told the court.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although Ramesh had raised several objections and proposed amendments to the bill, they were rejected by the chairman of the upper House, Chidambaram said. &amp;quot;But the chairman said he does not have the power (to consider the points mentioned by Ramesh) because the Speaker of the lower House had certified it.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chidambaram contended that both Houses of Parliament had equal rights and the court should not dismiss the petition on the ground that Ramesh had no locus standi.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court, however, asked Ramesh and the Centre to file written submissions and posted the plea for further hearing on July 20.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 11 May, 2016, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1160511/jsp/nation/story_84967.jsp#.VzKcwiH3-ho&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;bin-aadhaar-plea-govt-4679317&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4679317,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 31249,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Bin Aadhaar plea: Govt&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Money Bill,aadhaar,uid,UIDAI&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: The Centre today urged the Supreme Court to dismiss Congress Rajya Sabha member Jairam Ramesh&#039;s petition challenging the Aadhaar law, contending that an act passed by Parliament was immune from judicial challenge.

&amp;quot;The fact is that the law...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The Centre today urged the Supreme Court to dismiss Congress Rajya Sabha member Jairam Ramesh&#039;s petition challenging the Aadhaar law, contending that an act passed by Parliament was immune from judicial challenge.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;The fact is that the law has been passed as a money bill and the Speaker has confirmed it. It is immune from any judicial challenge,&amp;quot; attorney-general Mukul Rohatgi told a bench headed by Chief Justice T.S. Thakur.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Ramesh has said that the Lok Sabha passing the legislation as a money bill &amp;quot;was inappropriate and there was no discussion on it in the upper House&amp;quot;. The Rajya Sabha has no powers to block a money bill.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Ramesh has contended that the government&#039;s move to rush through the legislation without proper discussion in the Rajya Sabha violated his fundamental right as the law, meant for better targeting of subsidies, involved an individual&#039;s right to privacy as Aadhaar used biometric data.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;It is not known how the petitioner&#039;s fundamental right is violated. There is no description in the petition on this account,&amp;quot; Rohatgi told the bench, also comprising Justices R. Banumathi and U.U. Lalit, during a brief hearing.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Rohatgi questioned the maintainability of Ramesh&#039;s plea saying no fundamental right of the leader had been violated as the bill was passed by a majority in the lower House, and asked for the petition to be dismissed at the threshold.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Ramesh&#039;s counsel, senior advocate and former Union minister P. Chidambaram, however, said the matter should be heard as the manner in which the Lok Sabha passed the legislation violated a member&#039;s fundamental right to participate in a discussion in the upper House.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Parliament has violated the basic rule of law which is enshrined in our Constitution. The Rajya Sabha has the right to debate this. But this right was taken away,&amp;quot; Chidambaram told the court.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Although Ramesh had raised several objections and proposed amendments to the bill, they were rejected by the chairman of the upper House, Chidambaram said. &amp;quot;But the chairman said he does not have the power (to consider the points mentioned by Ramesh) because the Speaker of the lower House had certified it.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Chidambaram contended that both Houses of Parliament had equal rights and the court should not dismiss the petition on the ground that Ramesh had no locus standi.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court, however, asked Ramesh and the Centre to file written submissions and posted the plea for further hearing on July 20.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 31249,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Bin Aadhaar plea: Govt&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The Centre today urged the Supreme Court to dismiss Congress Rajya Sabha member Jairam Ramesh&#039;s petition challenging the Aadhaar law, contending that an act passed by Parliament was immune from judicial challenge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The fact is that the law has been passed as a money bill and the Speaker has confirmed it. It is immune from any judicial challenge,&amp;quot; attorney-general Mukul Rohatgi told a bench headed by Chief Justice T.S. Thakur.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ramesh has said that the Lok Sabha passing the legislation as a money bill &amp;quot;was inappropriate and there was no discussion on it in the upper House&amp;quot;. The Rajya Sabha has no powers to block a money bill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ramesh has contended that the government&#039;s move to rush through the legislation without proper discussion in the Rajya Sabha violated his fundamental right as the law, meant for better targeting of subsidies, involved an individual&#039;s right to privacy as Aadhaar used biometric data.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;It is not known how the petitioner&#039;s fundamental right is violated. There is no description in the petition on this account,&amp;quot; Rohatgi told the bench, also comprising Justices R. Banumathi and U.U. Lalit, during a brief hearing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rohatgi questioned the maintainability of Ramesh&#039;s plea saying no fundamental right of the leader had been violated as the bill was passed by a majority in the lower House, and asked for the petition to be dismissed at the threshold.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ramesh&#039;s counsel, senior advocate and former Union minister P. Chidambaram, however, said the matter should be heard as the manner in which the Lok Sabha passed the legislation violated a member&#039;s fundamental right to participate in a discussion in the upper House.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Parliament has violated the basic rule of law which is enshrined in our Constitution. The Rajya Sabha has the right to debate this. But this right was taken away,&amp;quot; Chidambaram told the court.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although Ramesh had raised several objections and proposed amendments to the bill, they were rejected by the chairman of the upper House, Chidambaram said. &amp;quot;But the chairman said he does not have the power (to consider the points mentioned by Ramesh) because the Speaker of the lower House had certified it.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chidambaram contended that both Houses of Parliament had equal rights and the court should not dismiss the petition on the ground that Ramesh had no locus standi.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court, however, asked Ramesh and the Centre to file written submissions and posted the plea for further hearing on July 20.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 11 May, 2016, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1160511/jsp/nation/story_84967.jsp#.VzKcwiH3-ho&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;bin-aadhaar-plea-govt-4679317&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 4679317,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 31249
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Bin Aadhaar plea: Govt&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Money Bill,aadhaar,uid,UIDAI&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: The Centre today urged the Supreme Court to dismiss Congress Rajya Sabha member Jairam Ramesh&#039;s petition challenging the Aadhaar law, contending that an act passed by Parliament was immune from judicial challenge.

&amp;quot;The fact is that the law...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;New Delhi: &lt;/em&gt;The Centre today urged the Supreme Court to dismiss Congress Rajya Sabha member Jairam Ramesh&#039;s petition challenging the Aadhaar law, contending that an act passed by Parliament was immune from judicial challenge.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;The fact is that the law has been passed as a money bill and the Speaker has confirmed it. It is immune from any judicial challenge,&amp;quot; attorney-general Mukul Rohatgi told a bench headed by Chief Justice T.S. Thakur.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Ramesh has said that the Lok Sabha passing the legislation as a money bill &amp;quot;was inappropriate and there was no discussion on it in the upper House&amp;quot;. The Rajya Sabha has no powers to block a money bill.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Ramesh has contended that the government&#039;s move to rush through the legislation without proper discussion in the Rajya Sabha violated his fundamental right as the law, meant for better targeting of subsidies, involved an individual&#039;s right to privacy as Aadhaar used biometric data.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;It is not known how the petitioner&#039;s fundamental right is violated. There is no description in the petition on this account,&amp;quot; Rohatgi told the bench, also comprising Justices R. Banumathi and U.U. Lalit, during a brief hearing.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Rohatgi questioned the maintainability of Ramesh&#039;s plea saying no fundamental right of the leader had been violated as the bill was passed by a majority in the lower House, and asked for the petition to be dismissed at the threshold.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Ramesh&#039;s counsel, senior advocate and former Union minister P. Chidambaram, however, said the matter should be heard as the manner in which the Lok Sabha passed the legislation violated a member&#039;s fundamental right to participate in a discussion in the upper House.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Parliament has violated the basic rule of law which is enshrined in our Constitution. The Rajya Sabha has the right to debate this. But this right was taken away,&amp;quot; Chidambaram told the court.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Although Ramesh had raised several objections and proposed amendments to the bill, they were rejected by the chairman of the upper House, Chidambaram said. &amp;quot;But the chairman said he does not have the power (to consider the points mentioned by Ramesh) because the Speaker of the lower House had certified it.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Chidambaram contended that both Houses of Parliament had equal rights and the court should not dismiss the petition on the ground that Ramesh had no locus standi.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court, however, asked Ramesh and the Centre to file written submissions and posted the plea for further hearing on July 20.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/bin-aadhaar-plea-govt-4679317.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Bin Aadhaar plea: Govt | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: The Centre today urged the Supreme Court to dismiss Congress Rajya Sabha member Jairam Ramesh's petition challenging the Aadhaar law, contending that an act passed by Parliament was immune from judicial challenge.

&quot;The fact is that the law..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Bin Aadhaar plea: Govt</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>The Centre today urged the Supreme Court to dismiss Congress Rajya Sabha member Jairam Ramesh's petition challenging the Aadhaar law, contending that an act passed by Parliament was immune from judicial challenge.<br /><br />&quot;The fact is that the law has been passed as a money bill and the Speaker has confirmed it. It is immune from any judicial challenge,&quot; attorney-general Mukul Rohatgi told a bench headed by Chief Justice T.S. Thakur.<br /><br />Ramesh has said that the Lok Sabha passing the legislation as a money bill &quot;was inappropriate and there was no discussion on it in the upper House&quot;. The Rajya Sabha has no powers to block a money bill.<br /><br />Ramesh has contended that the government's move to rush through the legislation without proper discussion in the Rajya Sabha violated his fundamental right as the law, meant for better targeting of subsidies, involved an individual's right to privacy as Aadhaar used biometric data.<br /><br />&quot;It is not known how the petitioner's fundamental right is violated. There is no description in the petition on this account,&quot; Rohatgi told the bench, also comprising Justices R. Banumathi and U.U. Lalit, during a brief hearing.<br /><br />Rohatgi questioned the maintainability of Ramesh's plea saying no fundamental right of the leader had been violated as the bill was passed by a majority in the lower House, and asked for the petition to be dismissed at the threshold.<br /><br />Ramesh's counsel, senior advocate and former Union minister P. Chidambaram, however, said the matter should be heard as the manner in which the Lok Sabha passed the legislation violated a member's fundamental right to participate in a discussion in the upper House.<br /><br />&quot;Parliament has violated the basic rule of law which is enshrined in our Constitution. The Rajya Sabha has the right to debate this. But this right was taken away,&quot; Chidambaram told the court.<br /><br />Although Ramesh had raised several objections and proposed amendments to the bill, they were rejected by the chairman of the upper House, Chidambaram said. &quot;But the chairman said he does not have the power (to consider the points mentioned by Ramesh) because the Speaker of the lower House had certified it.&quot;<br /><br />Chidambaram contended that both Houses of Parliament had equal rights and the court should not dismiss the petition on the ground that Ramesh had no locus standi.<br /><br />The court, however, asked Ramesh and the Centre to file written submissions and posted the plea for further hearing on July 20.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 31249,
		'title' => 'Bin Aadhaar plea: Govt',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Telegraph<br />
<br />
<em>New Delhi: </em>The Centre today urged the Supreme Court to dismiss Congress Rajya Sabha member Jairam Ramesh's petition challenging the Aadhaar law, contending that an act passed by Parliament was immune from judicial challenge.<br />
<br />
&quot;The fact is that the law has been passed as a money bill and the Speaker has confirmed it. It is immune from any judicial challenge,&quot; attorney-general Mukul Rohatgi told a bench headed by Chief Justice T.S. Thakur.<br />
<br />
Ramesh has said that the Lok Sabha passing the legislation as a money bill &quot;was inappropriate and there was no discussion on it in the upper House&quot;. The Rajya Sabha has no powers to block a money bill.<br />
<br />
Ramesh has contended that the government's move to rush through the legislation without proper discussion in the Rajya Sabha violated his fundamental right as the law, meant for better targeting of subsidies, involved an individual's right to privacy as Aadhaar used biometric data.<br />
<br />
&quot;It is not known how the petitioner's fundamental right is violated. There is no description in the petition on this account,&quot; Rohatgi told the bench, also comprising Justices R. Banumathi and U.U. Lalit, during a brief hearing.<br />
<br />
Rohatgi questioned the maintainability of Ramesh's plea saying no fundamental right of the leader had been violated as the bill was passed by a majority in the lower House, and asked for the petition to be dismissed at the threshold.<br />
<br />
Ramesh's counsel, senior advocate and former Union minister P. Chidambaram, however, said the matter should be heard as the manner in which the Lok Sabha passed the legislation violated a member's fundamental right to participate in a discussion in the upper House.<br />
<br />
&quot;Parliament has violated the basic rule of law which is enshrined in our Constitution. The Rajya Sabha has the right to debate this. But this right was taken away,&quot; Chidambaram told the court.<br />
<br />
Although Ramesh had raised several objections and proposed amendments to the bill, they were rejected by the chairman of the upper House, Chidambaram said. &quot;But the chairman said he does not have the power (to consider the points mentioned by Ramesh) because the Speaker of the lower House had certified it.&quot;<br />
<br />
Chidambaram contended that both Houses of Parliament had equal rights and the court should not dismiss the petition on the ground that Ramesh had no locus standi.<br />
<br />
The court, however, asked Ramesh and the Centre to file written submissions and posted the plea for further hearing on July 20.
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 11 May, 2016, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1160511/jsp/nation/story_84967.jsp#.VzKcwiH3-ho',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'bin-aadhaar-plea-govt-4679317',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 4679317,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 31249,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Bin Aadhaar plea: Govt',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Money Bill,aadhaar,uid,UIDAI',
	'metaDesc' => '
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: The Centre today urged the Supreme Court to dismiss Congress Rajya Sabha member Jairam Ramesh's petition challenging the Aadhaar law, contending that an act passed by Parliament was immune from judicial challenge.

&quot;The fact is that the law...',
	'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>The Centre today urged the Supreme Court to dismiss Congress Rajya Sabha member Jairam Ramesh's petition challenging the Aadhaar law, contending that an act passed by Parliament was immune from judicial challenge.<br /><br />&quot;The fact is that the law has been passed as a money bill and the Speaker has confirmed it. It is immune from any judicial challenge,&quot; attorney-general Mukul Rohatgi told a bench headed by Chief Justice T.S. Thakur.<br /><br />Ramesh has said that the Lok Sabha passing the legislation as a money bill &quot;was inappropriate and there was no discussion on it in the upper House&quot;. The Rajya Sabha has no powers to block a money bill.<br /><br />Ramesh has contended that the government's move to rush through the legislation without proper discussion in the Rajya Sabha violated his fundamental right as the law, meant for better targeting of subsidies, involved an individual's right to privacy as Aadhaar used biometric data.<br /><br />&quot;It is not known how the petitioner's fundamental right is violated. There is no description in the petition on this account,&quot; Rohatgi told the bench, also comprising Justices R. Banumathi and U.U. Lalit, during a brief hearing.<br /><br />Rohatgi questioned the maintainability of Ramesh's plea saying no fundamental right of the leader had been violated as the bill was passed by a majority in the lower House, and asked for the petition to be dismissed at the threshold.<br /><br />Ramesh's counsel, senior advocate and former Union minister P. Chidambaram, however, said the matter should be heard as the manner in which the Lok Sabha passed the legislation violated a member's fundamental right to participate in a discussion in the upper House.<br /><br />&quot;Parliament has violated the basic rule of law which is enshrined in our Constitution. The Rajya Sabha has the right to debate this. But this right was taken away,&quot; Chidambaram told the court.<br /><br />Although Ramesh had raised several objections and proposed amendments to the bill, they were rejected by the chairman of the upper House, Chidambaram said. &quot;But the chairman said he does not have the power (to consider the points mentioned by Ramesh) because the Speaker of the lower House had certified it.&quot;<br /><br />Chidambaram contended that both Houses of Parliament had equal rights and the court should not dismiss the petition on the ground that Ramesh had no locus standi.<br /><br />The court, however, asked Ramesh and the Centre to file written submissions and posted the plea for further hearing on July 20.</div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 31249,
	'title' => 'Bin Aadhaar plea: Govt',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Telegraph<br />
<br />
<em>New Delhi: </em>The Centre today urged the Supreme Court to dismiss Congress Rajya Sabha member Jairam Ramesh's petition challenging the Aadhaar law, contending that an act passed by Parliament was immune from judicial challenge.<br />
<br />
&quot;The fact is that the law has been passed as a money bill and the Speaker has confirmed it. It is immune from any judicial challenge,&quot; attorney-general Mukul Rohatgi told a bench headed by Chief Justice T.S. Thakur.<br />
<br />
Ramesh has said that the Lok Sabha passing the legislation as a money bill &quot;was inappropriate and there was no discussion on it in the upper House&quot;. The Rajya Sabha has no powers to block a money bill.<br />
<br />
Ramesh has contended that the government's move to rush through the legislation without proper discussion in the Rajya Sabha violated his fundamental right as the law, meant for better targeting of subsidies, involved an individual's right to privacy as Aadhaar used biometric data.<br />
<br />
&quot;It is not known how the petitioner's fundamental right is violated. There is no description in the petition on this account,&quot; Rohatgi told the bench, also comprising Justices R. Banumathi and U.U. Lalit, during a brief hearing.<br />
<br />
Rohatgi questioned the maintainability of Ramesh's plea saying no fundamental right of the leader had been violated as the bill was passed by a majority in the lower House, and asked for the petition to be dismissed at the threshold.<br />
<br />
Ramesh's counsel, senior advocate and former Union minister P. Chidambaram, however, said the matter should be heard as the manner in which the Lok Sabha passed the legislation violated a member's fundamental right to participate in a discussion in the upper House.<br />
<br />
&quot;Parliament has violated the basic rule of law which is enshrined in our Constitution. The Rajya Sabha has the right to debate this. But this right was taken away,&quot; Chidambaram told the court.<br />
<br />
Although Ramesh had raised several objections and proposed amendments to the bill, they were rejected by the chairman of the upper House, Chidambaram said. &quot;But the chairman said he does not have the power (to consider the points mentioned by Ramesh) because the Speaker of the lower House had certified it.&quot;<br />
<br />
Chidambaram contended that both Houses of Parliament had equal rights and the court should not dismiss the petition on the ground that Ramesh had no locus standi.<br />
<br />
The court, however, asked Ramesh and the Centre to file written submissions and posted the plea for further hearing on July 20.
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 11 May, 2016, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1160511/jsp/nation/story_84967.jsp#.VzKcwiH3-ho',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'bin-aadhaar-plea-govt-4679317',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 4679317,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 31249
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Bin Aadhaar plea: Govt'
$metaKeywords = 'Money Bill,aadhaar,uid,UIDAI'
$metaDesc = '
-The Telegraph

New Delhi: The Centre today urged the Supreme Court to dismiss Congress Rajya Sabha member Jairam Ramesh's petition challenging the Aadhaar law, contending that an act passed by Parliament was immune from judicial challenge.

&quot;The fact is that the law...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br /><em>New Delhi: </em>The Centre today urged the Supreme Court to dismiss Congress Rajya Sabha member Jairam Ramesh's petition challenging the Aadhaar law, contending that an act passed by Parliament was immune from judicial challenge.<br /><br />&quot;The fact is that the law has been passed as a money bill and the Speaker has confirmed it. It is immune from any judicial challenge,&quot; attorney-general Mukul Rohatgi told a bench headed by Chief Justice T.S. Thakur.<br /><br />Ramesh has said that the Lok Sabha passing the legislation as a money bill &quot;was inappropriate and there was no discussion on it in the upper House&quot;. The Rajya Sabha has no powers to block a money bill.<br /><br />Ramesh has contended that the government's move to rush through the legislation without proper discussion in the Rajya Sabha violated his fundamental right as the law, meant for better targeting of subsidies, involved an individual's right to privacy as Aadhaar used biometric data.<br /><br />&quot;It is not known how the petitioner's fundamental right is violated. There is no description in the petition on this account,&quot; Rohatgi told the bench, also comprising Justices R. Banumathi and U.U. Lalit, during a brief hearing.<br /><br />Rohatgi questioned the maintainability of Ramesh's plea saying no fundamental right of the leader had been violated as the bill was passed by a majority in the lower House, and asked for the petition to be dismissed at the threshold.<br /><br />Ramesh's counsel, senior advocate and former Union minister P. Chidambaram, however, said the matter should be heard as the manner in which the Lok Sabha passed the legislation violated a member's fundamental right to participate in a discussion in the upper House.<br /><br />&quot;Parliament has violated the basic rule of law which is enshrined in our Constitution. The Rajya Sabha has the right to debate this. But this right was taken away,&quot; Chidambaram told the court.<br /><br />Although Ramesh had raised several objections and proposed amendments to the bill, they were rejected by the chairman of the upper House, Chidambaram said. &quot;But the chairman said he does not have the power (to consider the points mentioned by Ramesh) because the Speaker of the lower House had certified it.&quot;<br /><br />Chidambaram contended that both Houses of Parliament had equal rights and the court should not dismiss the petition on the ground that Ramesh had no locus standi.<br /><br />The court, however, asked Ramesh and the Centre to file written submissions and posted the plea for further hearing on July 20.</div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

Bin Aadhaar plea: Govt

-The Telegraph New Delhi: The Centre today urged the Supreme Court to dismiss Congress Rajya Sabha member Jairam Ramesh's petition challenging the Aadhaar law, contending that an act passed by Parliament was immune from judicial challenge. "The fact is that the law has been passed as a money bill and the Speaker has confirmed it. It is immune from any judicial challenge," attorney-general Mukul Rohatgi told a bench headed by Chief Justice T.S. Thakur. Ramesh has said that the Lok Sabha passing the legislation as a money bill "was inappropriate and there was no discussion on it in the upper House". The Rajya Sabha has no powers to block a money bill. Ramesh has contended that the government's move to rush through the legislation without proper discussion in the Rajya Sabha violated his fundamental right as the law, meant for better targeting of subsidies, involved an individual's right to privacy as Aadhaar used biometric data. "It is not known how the petitioner's fundamental right is violated. There is no description in the petition on this account," Rohatgi told the bench, also comprising Justices R. Banumathi and U.U. Lalit, during a brief hearing. Rohatgi questioned the maintainability of Ramesh's plea saying no fundamental right of the leader had been violated as the bill was passed by a majority in the lower House, and asked for the petition to be dismissed at the threshold. Ramesh's counsel, senior advocate and former Union minister P. Chidambaram, however, said the matter should be heard as the manner in which the Lok Sabha passed the legislation violated a member's fundamental right to participate in a discussion in the upper House. "Parliament has violated the basic rule of law which is enshrined in our Constitution. The Rajya Sabha has the right to debate this. But this right was taken away," Chidambaram told the court. Although Ramesh had raised several objections and proposed amendments to the bill, they were rejected by the chairman of the upper House, Chidambaram said. "But the chairman said he does not have the power (to consider the points mentioned by Ramesh) because the Speaker of the lower House had certified it." Chidambaram contended that both Houses of Parliament had equal rights and the court should not dismiss the petition on the ground that Ramesh had no locus standi. The court, however, asked Ramesh and the Centre to file written submissions and posted the plea for further hearing on July 20.