Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/bin-it-or-ban-it-charmy-harikrishnan-15226/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/bin-it-or-ban-it-charmy-harikrishnan-15226/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/bin-it-or-ban-it-charmy-harikrishnan-15226/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/bin-it-or-ban-it-charmy-harikrishnan-15226/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea10c82a74b-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea10c82a74b-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67ea10c82a74b-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea10c82a74b-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea10c82a74b-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea10c82a74b-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea10c82a74b-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67ea10c82a74b-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67ea10c82a74b-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 15101, 'title' => 'Bin it or ban it-Charmy Harikrishnan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>The cartoon controversy shows the enthusiasm of our political class to create a quiescent, question-less environment</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The year was 1967. Vaikkom Muhammad Basheer had published a story &mdash; in Malayalam, of course &mdash; called Oru Bhagavad Gitayum Kure Mulakalum (A Bhagavad Gita and a Few Breasts). This Muslim was having good fun, writing about getting hold of a new edition of the Gita and watching a procession of half-naked nubile Nair girls. Don&rsquo;t ask what possible connection could be between the two incidents. This is Basheer. And he is the master of meanderings and benign mockery. In 2012, Basheer would have had to look for another title; the very conjunction would be considered blasphemous. And perhaps write another story as well. Our censoring reflexes have become so fine-tuned, and our sense of satire so pitiable, that we would have blacklisted Basheer. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Ours is the golden age of communication. There are more books published than ever before. There are more Facebook posts, blogs and tweets creating corridors of instant discourse. But there is a greater fear too &mdash; of ideas, of books, paintings, websites and now, cartoons. And the call to bury them, which has come from fringe elements, seems to be increasingly echoed by politicians. This is dangerous, because while our intellectuals tend to talk among themselves in intellectual-ese, it is the enlightened representatives of people who should publicly stand as the defenders of democracy. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> When censorship is imposed under the cloak of political correctness &mdash; precluding dissent and debate, interring ridicule and irreverence &mdash; and tolerated, it shows the inanity of our age as well. Between retweeting and clicking the Like button, we seem to be collectively losing the tools of argument &mdash; a sense of history and a handle on multiple narratives. In our First Amendment-less country, the &ldquo;right to free speech and expression&rdquo; is no longer effective enough. And our liberal sinew to protect intellectual independence is slacking outside and inside the House. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> We saw it earlier when M.F. Husain&rsquo;s naked Saraswati became offensive. Someone should have loudly read out Adi Shankara&rsquo;s Soundarya Lahiri, where the high priest of Hinduism gloriously describes a goddess in graphic detail, which Basheer, for one, would have widely grinned at. Now, before Shankar&rsquo;s cartoon is hastily bundled away by Kapil Sibal, Pranab Mukherjee and the rest of our parliamentarians, there is no debate on cartoon as art in the House. Instead, there is a bewildering consensus to delete what they believe is irreverent. They don&rsquo;t find the need to appreciate it or argue with it &mdash; that would indeed be trying. It is far easier to bin it or ban it. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> We bleep &ldquo;offensive&rdquo; words, clothe our gods as though there is a textile factory in the heavens and bring out a beef-less menu. A nation that yanks out all offence &mdash; real and perceived &mdash; is a limited democracy. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But has our daily political cartoon too become mellow with time, lost its instinct to shock, shake us by the shoulders? Has the tactile fury left the pen &mdash; the one you could immediately sense in the stork-like nose of Abu Abraham&rsquo;s Indira Gandhi or even O.V. Vijayan&rsquo;s porcine Indira &mdash; leading West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee to conclude that all art should be like hers or the soothing Rabindra Sangeet that she insists should blare out of every street corner in Kolkata these days? She should take a look at Vijayan&rsquo;s cartoon &mdash; where Mrs Gandhi with a snout, following the fall of the Morarji Desai government, sits with a piggish Charan Singh and Jagjivan Ram &mdash; before crying murder at a cartoon that is a redux of a Satyajit Ray shot. Rest assured, if Congress stalwarts &ldquo;discover&rdquo; Vijayan&rsquo;s cartoon now, there could be a retrospective ban on it as well. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This is the enthusiasm of our political class to elide narratives other than the ones they have whetted and approved, much like the stamp of the censor&rsquo;s seal and signature during the Emergency. It was there when Abhishek Singhvi worked overtime to ensure that the English translation of Javier Moro&rsquo;s biography of Sonia Gandhi never got published in India. It is there in the stone gardens of Mayawati &mdash; a narcissistic love for monologues and monoliths that has taken the shape of statues that she got built of herself, B.R. Ambedkar and Kanshi Ram &mdash; and in her intolerance for a few laugh lines for which Shankar did not evidently seek her permission. The intense coddling of the self, to control the narrative, no questions asked, is there even in Rahul Gandhi&rsquo;s refusal to engage with the media. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> We are all turning into a collective that not only clicks but also seeks Facebook&rsquo;s Like sign to every comment. We are all guilty of creating a quiescent, question-less environment. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Here is a mediocre poem. &ldquo;Teachers have space/ and years to sculpt/ to mould, to carve/ to paint with ease. Give vision to/ blindfolded minds/ contour new paths/ for curious eyes.&rdquo; It is published without controversy. It is safe. It is staid. It is like a Class VII essay on Teacher&rsquo;s Day cut evenly to wear the look of verse. It is Kapil Sibal&rsquo;s. Thankfully for him, and Mamata Banerjee, that pedestrian painter of swirling flowers and wide eyes, our ministers and chief ministers are not expected to be great artists. But they are expected to let ideas be, let the arts be &mdash; even such things as satire that they seem to have some trouble understanding. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 18 May, 2012, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/bin-it-or-ban-it/950686/0', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'bin-it-or-ban-it-charmy-harikrishnan-15226', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 15226, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 15101, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Bin it or ban it-Charmy Harikrishnan', 'metaKeywords' => 'cartoon,Freedom of Speech', 'metaDesc' => ' The cartoon controversy shows the enthusiasm of our political class to create a quiescent, question-less environment The year was 1967. Vaikkom Muhammad Basheer had published a story &mdash; in Malayalam, of course &mdash; called Oru Bhagavad Gitayum Kure Mulakalum (A Bhagavad...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>The cartoon controversy shows the enthusiasm of our political class to create a quiescent, question-less environment</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The year was 1967. Vaikkom Muhammad Basheer had published a story &mdash; in Malayalam, of course &mdash; called Oru Bhagavad Gitayum Kure Mulakalum (A Bhagavad Gita and a Few Breasts). This Muslim was having good fun, writing about getting hold of a new edition of the Gita and watching a procession of half-naked nubile Nair girls. Don&rsquo;t ask what possible connection could be between the two incidents. This is Basheer. And he is the master of meanderings and benign mockery. In 2012, Basheer would have had to look for another title; the very conjunction would be considered blasphemous. And perhaps write another story as well. Our censoring reflexes have become so fine-tuned, and our sense of satire so pitiable, that we would have blacklisted Basheer.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Ours is the golden age of communication. There are more books published than ever before. There are more Facebook posts, blogs and tweets creating corridors of instant discourse. But there is a greater fear too &mdash; of ideas, of books, paintings, websites and now, cartoons. And the call to bury them, which has come from fringe elements, seems to be increasingly echoed by politicians. This is dangerous, because while our intellectuals tend to talk among themselves in intellectual-ese, it is the enlightened representatives of people who should publicly stand as the defenders of democracy.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">When censorship is imposed under the cloak of political correctness &mdash; precluding dissent and debate, interring ridicule and irreverence &mdash; and tolerated, it shows the inanity of our age as well. Between retweeting and clicking the Like button, we seem to be collectively losing the tools of argument &mdash; a sense of history and a handle on multiple narratives. In our First Amendment-less country, the &ldquo;right to free speech and expression&rdquo; is no longer effective enough. And our liberal sinew to protect intellectual independence is slacking outside and inside the House.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">We saw it earlier when M.F. Husain&rsquo;s naked Saraswati became offensive. Someone should have loudly read out Adi Shankara&rsquo;s Soundarya Lahiri, where the high priest of Hinduism gloriously describes a goddess in graphic detail, which Basheer, for one, would have widely grinned at. Now, before Shankar&rsquo;s cartoon is hastily bundled away by Kapil Sibal, Pranab Mukherjee and the rest of our parliamentarians, there is no debate on cartoon as art in the House. Instead, there is a bewildering consensus to delete what they believe is irreverent. They don&rsquo;t find the need to appreciate it or argue with it &mdash; that would indeed be trying. It is far easier to bin it or ban it.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">We bleep &ldquo;offensive&rdquo; words, clothe our gods as though there is a textile factory in the heavens and bring out a beef-less menu. A nation that yanks out all offence &mdash; real and perceived &mdash; is a limited democracy.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But has our daily political cartoon too become mellow with time, lost its instinct to shock, shake us by the shoulders? Has the tactile fury left the pen &mdash; the one you could immediately sense in the stork-like nose of Abu Abraham&rsquo;s Indira Gandhi or even O.V. Vijayan&rsquo;s porcine Indira &mdash; leading West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee to conclude that all art should be like hers or the soothing Rabindra Sangeet that she insists should blare out of every street corner in Kolkata these days? She should take a look at Vijayan&rsquo;s cartoon &mdash; where Mrs Gandhi with a snout, following the fall of the Morarji Desai government, sits with a piggish Charan Singh and Jagjivan Ram &mdash; before crying murder at a cartoon that is a redux of a Satyajit Ray shot. Rest assured, if Congress stalwarts &ldquo;discover&rdquo; Vijayan&rsquo;s cartoon now, there could be a retrospective ban on it as well.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This is the enthusiasm of our political class to elide narratives other than the ones they have whetted and approved, much like the stamp of the censor&rsquo;s seal and signature during the Emergency. It was there when Abhishek Singhvi worked overtime to ensure that the English translation of Javier Moro&rsquo;s biography of Sonia Gandhi never got published in India. It is there in the stone gardens of Mayawati &mdash; a narcissistic love for monologues and monoliths that has taken the shape of statues that she got built of herself, B.R. Ambedkar and Kanshi Ram &mdash; and in her intolerance for a few laugh lines for which Shankar did not evidently seek her permission. The intense coddling of the self, to control the narrative, no questions asked, is there even in Rahul Gandhi&rsquo;s refusal to engage with the media.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">We are all turning into a collective that not only clicks but also seeks Facebook&rsquo;s Like sign to every comment. We are all guilty of creating a quiescent, question-less environment.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Here is a mediocre poem. &ldquo;Teachers have space/ and years to sculpt/ to mould, to carve/ to paint with ease. Give vision to/ blindfolded minds/ contour new paths/ for curious eyes.&rdquo; It is published without controversy. It is safe. It is staid. It is like a Class VII essay on Teacher&rsquo;s Day cut evenly to wear the look of verse. It is Kapil Sibal&rsquo;s. Thankfully for him, and Mamata Banerjee, that pedestrian painter of swirling flowers and wide eyes, our ministers and chief ministers are not expected to be great artists. But they are expected to let ideas be, let the arts be &mdash; even such things as satire that they seem to have some trouble understanding.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 15101, 'title' => 'Bin it or ban it-Charmy Harikrishnan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>The cartoon controversy shows the enthusiasm of our political class to create a quiescent, question-less environment</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The year was 1967. Vaikkom Muhammad Basheer had published a story &mdash; in Malayalam, of course &mdash; called Oru Bhagavad Gitayum Kure Mulakalum (A Bhagavad Gita and a Few Breasts). This Muslim was having good fun, writing about getting hold of a new edition of the Gita and watching a procession of half-naked nubile Nair girls. Don&rsquo;t ask what possible connection could be between the two incidents. This is Basheer. And he is the master of meanderings and benign mockery. In 2012, Basheer would have had to look for another title; the very conjunction would be considered blasphemous. And perhaps write another story as well. Our censoring reflexes have become so fine-tuned, and our sense of satire so pitiable, that we would have blacklisted Basheer. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Ours is the golden age of communication. There are more books published than ever before. There are more Facebook posts, blogs and tweets creating corridors of instant discourse. But there is a greater fear too &mdash; of ideas, of books, paintings, websites and now, cartoons. And the call to bury them, which has come from fringe elements, seems to be increasingly echoed by politicians. This is dangerous, because while our intellectuals tend to talk among themselves in intellectual-ese, it is the enlightened representatives of people who should publicly stand as the defenders of democracy. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> When censorship is imposed under the cloak of political correctness &mdash; precluding dissent and debate, interring ridicule and irreverence &mdash; and tolerated, it shows the inanity of our age as well. Between retweeting and clicking the Like button, we seem to be collectively losing the tools of argument &mdash; a sense of history and a handle on multiple narratives. In our First Amendment-less country, the &ldquo;right to free speech and expression&rdquo; is no longer effective enough. And our liberal sinew to protect intellectual independence is slacking outside and inside the House. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> We saw it earlier when M.F. Husain&rsquo;s naked Saraswati became offensive. Someone should have loudly read out Adi Shankara&rsquo;s Soundarya Lahiri, where the high priest of Hinduism gloriously describes a goddess in graphic detail, which Basheer, for one, would have widely grinned at. Now, before Shankar&rsquo;s cartoon is hastily bundled away by Kapil Sibal, Pranab Mukherjee and the rest of our parliamentarians, there is no debate on cartoon as art in the House. Instead, there is a bewildering consensus to delete what they believe is irreverent. They don&rsquo;t find the need to appreciate it or argue with it &mdash; that would indeed be trying. It is far easier to bin it or ban it. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> We bleep &ldquo;offensive&rdquo; words, clothe our gods as though there is a textile factory in the heavens and bring out a beef-less menu. A nation that yanks out all offence &mdash; real and perceived &mdash; is a limited democracy. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But has our daily political cartoon too become mellow with time, lost its instinct to shock, shake us by the shoulders? Has the tactile fury left the pen &mdash; the one you could immediately sense in the stork-like nose of Abu Abraham&rsquo;s Indira Gandhi or even O.V. Vijayan&rsquo;s porcine Indira &mdash; leading West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee to conclude that all art should be like hers or the soothing Rabindra Sangeet that she insists should blare out of every street corner in Kolkata these days? She should take a look at Vijayan&rsquo;s cartoon &mdash; where Mrs Gandhi with a snout, following the fall of the Morarji Desai government, sits with a piggish Charan Singh and Jagjivan Ram &mdash; before crying murder at a cartoon that is a redux of a Satyajit Ray shot. Rest assured, if Congress stalwarts &ldquo;discover&rdquo; Vijayan&rsquo;s cartoon now, there could be a retrospective ban on it as well. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This is the enthusiasm of our political class to elide narratives other than the ones they have whetted and approved, much like the stamp of the censor&rsquo;s seal and signature during the Emergency. It was there when Abhishek Singhvi worked overtime to ensure that the English translation of Javier Moro&rsquo;s biography of Sonia Gandhi never got published in India. It is there in the stone gardens of Mayawati &mdash; a narcissistic love for monologues and monoliths that has taken the shape of statues that she got built of herself, B.R. Ambedkar and Kanshi Ram &mdash; and in her intolerance for a few laugh lines for which Shankar did not evidently seek her permission. The intense coddling of the self, to control the narrative, no questions asked, is there even in Rahul Gandhi&rsquo;s refusal to engage with the media. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> We are all turning into a collective that not only clicks but also seeks Facebook&rsquo;s Like sign to every comment. We are all guilty of creating a quiescent, question-less environment. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Here is a mediocre poem. &ldquo;Teachers have space/ and years to sculpt/ to mould, to carve/ to paint with ease. Give vision to/ blindfolded minds/ contour new paths/ for curious eyes.&rdquo; It is published without controversy. It is safe. It is staid. It is like a Class VII essay on Teacher&rsquo;s Day cut evenly to wear the look of verse. It is Kapil Sibal&rsquo;s. Thankfully for him, and Mamata Banerjee, that pedestrian painter of swirling flowers and wide eyes, our ministers and chief ministers are not expected to be great artists. But they are expected to let ideas be, let the arts be &mdash; even such things as satire that they seem to have some trouble understanding. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 18 May, 2012, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/bin-it-or-ban-it/950686/0', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'bin-it-or-ban-it-charmy-harikrishnan-15226', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 15226, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 15101 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Bin it or ban it-Charmy Harikrishnan' $metaKeywords = 'cartoon,Freedom of Speech' $metaDesc = ' The cartoon controversy shows the enthusiasm of our political class to create a quiescent, question-less environment The year was 1967. Vaikkom Muhammad Basheer had published a story &mdash; in Malayalam, of course &mdash; called Oru Bhagavad Gitayum Kure Mulakalum (A Bhagavad...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>The cartoon controversy shows the enthusiasm of our political class to create a quiescent, question-less environment</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The year was 1967. Vaikkom Muhammad Basheer had published a story &mdash; in Malayalam, of course &mdash; called Oru Bhagavad Gitayum Kure Mulakalum (A Bhagavad Gita and a Few Breasts). This Muslim was having good fun, writing about getting hold of a new edition of the Gita and watching a procession of half-naked nubile Nair girls. Don&rsquo;t ask what possible connection could be between the two incidents. This is Basheer. And he is the master of meanderings and benign mockery. In 2012, Basheer would have had to look for another title; the very conjunction would be considered blasphemous. And perhaps write another story as well. Our censoring reflexes have become so fine-tuned, and our sense of satire so pitiable, that we would have blacklisted Basheer.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Ours is the golden age of communication. There are more books published than ever before. There are more Facebook posts, blogs and tweets creating corridors of instant discourse. But there is a greater fear too &mdash; of ideas, of books, paintings, websites and now, cartoons. And the call to bury them, which has come from fringe elements, seems to be increasingly echoed by politicians. This is dangerous, because while our intellectuals tend to talk among themselves in intellectual-ese, it is the enlightened representatives of people who should publicly stand as the defenders of democracy.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">When censorship is imposed under the cloak of political correctness &mdash; precluding dissent and debate, interring ridicule and irreverence &mdash; and tolerated, it shows the inanity of our age as well. Between retweeting and clicking the Like button, we seem to be collectively losing the tools of argument &mdash; a sense of history and a handle on multiple narratives. In our First Amendment-less country, the &ldquo;right to free speech and expression&rdquo; is no longer effective enough. And our liberal sinew to protect intellectual independence is slacking outside and inside the House.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">We saw it earlier when M.F. Husain&rsquo;s naked Saraswati became offensive. Someone should have loudly read out Adi Shankara&rsquo;s Soundarya Lahiri, where the high priest of Hinduism gloriously describes a goddess in graphic detail, which Basheer, for one, would have widely grinned at. Now, before Shankar&rsquo;s cartoon is hastily bundled away by Kapil Sibal, Pranab Mukherjee and the rest of our parliamentarians, there is no debate on cartoon as art in the House. Instead, there is a bewildering consensus to delete what they believe is irreverent. They don&rsquo;t find the need to appreciate it or argue with it &mdash; that would indeed be trying. It is far easier to bin it or ban it.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">We bleep &ldquo;offensive&rdquo; words, clothe our gods as though there is a textile factory in the heavens and bring out a beef-less menu. A nation that yanks out all offence &mdash; real and perceived &mdash; is a limited democracy.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But has our daily political cartoon too become mellow with time, lost its instinct to shock, shake us by the shoulders? Has the tactile fury left the pen &mdash; the one you could immediately sense in the stork-like nose of Abu Abraham&rsquo;s Indira Gandhi or even O.V. Vijayan&rsquo;s porcine Indira &mdash; leading West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee to conclude that all art should be like hers or the soothing Rabindra Sangeet that she insists should blare out of every street corner in Kolkata these days? She should take a look at Vijayan&rsquo;s cartoon &mdash; where Mrs Gandhi with a snout, following the fall of the Morarji Desai government, sits with a piggish Charan Singh and Jagjivan Ram &mdash; before crying murder at a cartoon that is a redux of a Satyajit Ray shot. Rest assured, if Congress stalwarts &ldquo;discover&rdquo; Vijayan&rsquo;s cartoon now, there could be a retrospective ban on it as well.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This is the enthusiasm of our political class to elide narratives other than the ones they have whetted and approved, much like the stamp of the censor&rsquo;s seal and signature during the Emergency. It was there when Abhishek Singhvi worked overtime to ensure that the English translation of Javier Moro&rsquo;s biography of Sonia Gandhi never got published in India. It is there in the stone gardens of Mayawati &mdash; a narcissistic love for monologues and monoliths that has taken the shape of statues that she got built of herself, B.R. Ambedkar and Kanshi Ram &mdash; and in her intolerance for a few laugh lines for which Shankar did not evidently seek her permission. The intense coddling of the self, to control the narrative, no questions asked, is there even in Rahul Gandhi&rsquo;s refusal to engage with the media.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">We are all turning into a collective that not only clicks but also seeks Facebook&rsquo;s Like sign to every comment. We are all guilty of creating a quiescent, question-less environment.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Here is a mediocre poem. &ldquo;Teachers have space/ and years to sculpt/ to mould, to carve/ to paint with ease. Give vision to/ blindfolded minds/ contour new paths/ for curious eyes.&rdquo; It is published without controversy. It is safe. It is staid. It is like a Class VII essay on Teacher&rsquo;s Day cut evenly to wear the look of verse. It is Kapil Sibal&rsquo;s. Thankfully for him, and Mamata Banerjee, that pedestrian painter of swirling flowers and wide eyes, our ministers and chief ministers are not expected to be great artists. But they are expected to let ideas be, let the arts be &mdash; even such things as satire that they seem to have some trouble understanding.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/bin-it-or-ban-it-charmy-harikrishnan-15226.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Bin it or ban it-Charmy Harikrishnan | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" The cartoon controversy shows the enthusiasm of our political class to create a quiescent, question-less environment The year was 1967. Vaikkom Muhammad Basheer had published a story — in Malayalam, of course — called Oru Bhagavad Gitayum Kure Mulakalum (A Bhagavad..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Bin it or ban it-Charmy Harikrishnan</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>The cartoon controversy shows the enthusiasm of our political class to create a quiescent, question-less environment</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The year was 1967. Vaikkom Muhammad Basheer had published a story — in Malayalam, of course — called Oru Bhagavad Gitayum Kure Mulakalum (A Bhagavad Gita and a Few Breasts). This Muslim was having good fun, writing about getting hold of a new edition of the Gita and watching a procession of half-naked nubile Nair girls. Don’t ask what possible connection could be between the two incidents. This is Basheer. And he is the master of meanderings and benign mockery. In 2012, Basheer would have had to look for another title; the very conjunction would be considered blasphemous. And perhaps write another story as well. Our censoring reflexes have become so fine-tuned, and our sense of satire so pitiable, that we would have blacklisted Basheer.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Ours is the golden age of communication. There are more books published than ever before. There are more Facebook posts, blogs and tweets creating corridors of instant discourse. But there is a greater fear too — of ideas, of books, paintings, websites and now, cartoons. And the call to bury them, which has come from fringe elements, seems to be increasingly echoed by politicians. This is dangerous, because while our intellectuals tend to talk among themselves in intellectual-ese, it is the enlightened representatives of people who should publicly stand as the defenders of democracy.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">When censorship is imposed under the cloak of political correctness — precluding dissent and debate, interring ridicule and irreverence — and tolerated, it shows the inanity of our age as well. Between retweeting and clicking the Like button, we seem to be collectively losing the tools of argument — a sense of history and a handle on multiple narratives. In our First Amendment-less country, the “right to free speech and expression” is no longer effective enough. And our liberal sinew to protect intellectual independence is slacking outside and inside the House.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">We saw it earlier when M.F. Husain’s naked Saraswati became offensive. Someone should have loudly read out Adi Shankara’s Soundarya Lahiri, where the high priest of Hinduism gloriously describes a goddess in graphic detail, which Basheer, for one, would have widely grinned at. Now, before Shankar’s cartoon is hastily bundled away by Kapil Sibal, Pranab Mukherjee and the rest of our parliamentarians, there is no debate on cartoon as art in the House. Instead, there is a bewildering consensus to delete what they believe is irreverent. They don’t find the need to appreciate it or argue with it — that would indeed be trying. It is far easier to bin it or ban it.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">We bleep “offensive” words, clothe our gods as though there is a textile factory in the heavens and bring out a beef-less menu. A nation that yanks out all offence — real and perceived — is a limited democracy.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But has our daily political cartoon too become mellow with time, lost its instinct to shock, shake us by the shoulders? Has the tactile fury left the pen — the one you could immediately sense in the stork-like nose of Abu Abraham’s Indira Gandhi or even O.V. Vijayan’s porcine Indira — leading West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee to conclude that all art should be like hers or the soothing Rabindra Sangeet that she insists should blare out of every street corner in Kolkata these days? She should take a look at Vijayan’s cartoon — where Mrs Gandhi with a snout, following the fall of the Morarji Desai government, sits with a piggish Charan Singh and Jagjivan Ram — before crying murder at a cartoon that is a redux of a Satyajit Ray shot. Rest assured, if Congress stalwarts “discover” Vijayan’s cartoon now, there could be a retrospective ban on it as well.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This is the enthusiasm of our political class to elide narratives other than the ones they have whetted and approved, much like the stamp of the censor’s seal and signature during the Emergency. It was there when Abhishek Singhvi worked overtime to ensure that the English translation of Javier Moro’s biography of Sonia Gandhi never got published in India. It is there in the stone gardens of Mayawati — a narcissistic love for monologues and monoliths that has taken the shape of statues that she got built of herself, B.R. Ambedkar and Kanshi Ram — and in her intolerance for a few laugh lines for which Shankar did not evidently seek her permission. The intense coddling of the self, to control the narrative, no questions asked, is there even in Rahul Gandhi’s refusal to engage with the media.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">We are all turning into a collective that not only clicks but also seeks Facebook’s Like sign to every comment. We are all guilty of creating a quiescent, question-less environment.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Here is a mediocre poem. “Teachers have space/ and years to sculpt/ to mould, to carve/ to paint with ease. Give vision to/ blindfolded minds/ contour new paths/ for curious eyes.” It is published without controversy. It is safe. It is staid. It is like a Class VII essay on Teacher’s Day cut evenly to wear the look of verse. It is Kapil Sibal’s. Thankfully for him, and Mamata Banerjee, that pedestrian painter of swirling flowers and wide eyes, our ministers and chief ministers are not expected to be great artists. But they are expected to let ideas be, let the arts be — even such things as satire that they seem to have some trouble understanding.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea10c82a74b-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea10c82a74b-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67ea10c82a74b-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea10c82a74b-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea10c82a74b-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea10c82a74b-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea10c82a74b-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67ea10c82a74b-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67ea10c82a74b-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 15101, 'title' => 'Bin it or ban it-Charmy Harikrishnan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>The cartoon controversy shows the enthusiasm of our political class to create a quiescent, question-less environment</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The year was 1967. Vaikkom Muhammad Basheer had published a story &mdash; in Malayalam, of course &mdash; called Oru Bhagavad Gitayum Kure Mulakalum (A Bhagavad Gita and a Few Breasts). This Muslim was having good fun, writing about getting hold of a new edition of the Gita and watching a procession of half-naked nubile Nair girls. Don&rsquo;t ask what possible connection could be between the two incidents. This is Basheer. And he is the master of meanderings and benign mockery. In 2012, Basheer would have had to look for another title; the very conjunction would be considered blasphemous. And perhaps write another story as well. Our censoring reflexes have become so fine-tuned, and our sense of satire so pitiable, that we would have blacklisted Basheer. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Ours is the golden age of communication. There are more books published than ever before. There are more Facebook posts, blogs and tweets creating corridors of instant discourse. But there is a greater fear too &mdash; of ideas, of books, paintings, websites and now, cartoons. And the call to bury them, which has come from fringe elements, seems to be increasingly echoed by politicians. This is dangerous, because while our intellectuals tend to talk among themselves in intellectual-ese, it is the enlightened representatives of people who should publicly stand as the defenders of democracy. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> When censorship is imposed under the cloak of political correctness &mdash; precluding dissent and debate, interring ridicule and irreverence &mdash; and tolerated, it shows the inanity of our age as well. Between retweeting and clicking the Like button, we seem to be collectively losing the tools of argument &mdash; a sense of history and a handle on multiple narratives. In our First Amendment-less country, the &ldquo;right to free speech and expression&rdquo; is no longer effective enough. And our liberal sinew to protect intellectual independence is slacking outside and inside the House. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> We saw it earlier when M.F. Husain&rsquo;s naked Saraswati became offensive. Someone should have loudly read out Adi Shankara&rsquo;s Soundarya Lahiri, where the high priest of Hinduism gloriously describes a goddess in graphic detail, which Basheer, for one, would have widely grinned at. Now, before Shankar&rsquo;s cartoon is hastily bundled away by Kapil Sibal, Pranab Mukherjee and the rest of our parliamentarians, there is no debate on cartoon as art in the House. Instead, there is a bewildering consensus to delete what they believe is irreverent. They don&rsquo;t find the need to appreciate it or argue with it &mdash; that would indeed be trying. It is far easier to bin it or ban it. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> We bleep &ldquo;offensive&rdquo; words, clothe our gods as though there is a textile factory in the heavens and bring out a beef-less menu. A nation that yanks out all offence &mdash; real and perceived &mdash; is a limited democracy. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But has our daily political cartoon too become mellow with time, lost its instinct to shock, shake us by the shoulders? Has the tactile fury left the pen &mdash; the one you could immediately sense in the stork-like nose of Abu Abraham&rsquo;s Indira Gandhi or even O.V. Vijayan&rsquo;s porcine Indira &mdash; leading West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee to conclude that all art should be like hers or the soothing Rabindra Sangeet that she insists should blare out of every street corner in Kolkata these days? She should take a look at Vijayan&rsquo;s cartoon &mdash; where Mrs Gandhi with a snout, following the fall of the Morarji Desai government, sits with a piggish Charan Singh and Jagjivan Ram &mdash; before crying murder at a cartoon that is a redux of a Satyajit Ray shot. Rest assured, if Congress stalwarts &ldquo;discover&rdquo; Vijayan&rsquo;s cartoon now, there could be a retrospective ban on it as well. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This is the enthusiasm of our political class to elide narratives other than the ones they have whetted and approved, much like the stamp of the censor&rsquo;s seal and signature during the Emergency. It was there when Abhishek Singhvi worked overtime to ensure that the English translation of Javier Moro&rsquo;s biography of Sonia Gandhi never got published in India. It is there in the stone gardens of Mayawati &mdash; a narcissistic love for monologues and monoliths that has taken the shape of statues that she got built of herself, B.R. Ambedkar and Kanshi Ram &mdash; and in her intolerance for a few laugh lines for which Shankar did not evidently seek her permission. The intense coddling of the self, to control the narrative, no questions asked, is there even in Rahul Gandhi&rsquo;s refusal to engage with the media. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> We are all turning into a collective that not only clicks but also seeks Facebook&rsquo;s Like sign to every comment. We are all guilty of creating a quiescent, question-less environment. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Here is a mediocre poem. &ldquo;Teachers have space/ and years to sculpt/ to mould, to carve/ to paint with ease. Give vision to/ blindfolded minds/ contour new paths/ for curious eyes.&rdquo; It is published without controversy. It is safe. It is staid. It is like a Class VII essay on Teacher&rsquo;s Day cut evenly to wear the look of verse. It is Kapil Sibal&rsquo;s. Thankfully for him, and Mamata Banerjee, that pedestrian painter of swirling flowers and wide eyes, our ministers and chief ministers are not expected to be great artists. But they are expected to let ideas be, let the arts be &mdash; even such things as satire that they seem to have some trouble understanding. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 18 May, 2012, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/bin-it-or-ban-it/950686/0', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'bin-it-or-ban-it-charmy-harikrishnan-15226', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 15226, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 15101, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Bin it or ban it-Charmy Harikrishnan', 'metaKeywords' => 'cartoon,Freedom of Speech', 'metaDesc' => ' The cartoon controversy shows the enthusiasm of our political class to create a quiescent, question-less environment The year was 1967. Vaikkom Muhammad Basheer had published a story &mdash; in Malayalam, of course &mdash; called Oru Bhagavad Gitayum Kure Mulakalum (A Bhagavad...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>The cartoon controversy shows the enthusiasm of our political class to create a quiescent, question-less environment</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The year was 1967. Vaikkom Muhammad Basheer had published a story &mdash; in Malayalam, of course &mdash; called Oru Bhagavad Gitayum Kure Mulakalum (A Bhagavad Gita and a Few Breasts). This Muslim was having good fun, writing about getting hold of a new edition of the Gita and watching a procession of half-naked nubile Nair girls. Don&rsquo;t ask what possible connection could be between the two incidents. This is Basheer. And he is the master of meanderings and benign mockery. In 2012, Basheer would have had to look for another title; the very conjunction would be considered blasphemous. And perhaps write another story as well. Our censoring reflexes have become so fine-tuned, and our sense of satire so pitiable, that we would have blacklisted Basheer.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Ours is the golden age of communication. There are more books published than ever before. There are more Facebook posts, blogs and tweets creating corridors of instant discourse. But there is a greater fear too &mdash; of ideas, of books, paintings, websites and now, cartoons. And the call to bury them, which has come from fringe elements, seems to be increasingly echoed by politicians. This is dangerous, because while our intellectuals tend to talk among themselves in intellectual-ese, it is the enlightened representatives of people who should publicly stand as the defenders of democracy.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">When censorship is imposed under the cloak of political correctness &mdash; precluding dissent and debate, interring ridicule and irreverence &mdash; and tolerated, it shows the inanity of our age as well. Between retweeting and clicking the Like button, we seem to be collectively losing the tools of argument &mdash; a sense of history and a handle on multiple narratives. In our First Amendment-less country, the &ldquo;right to free speech and expression&rdquo; is no longer effective enough. And our liberal sinew to protect intellectual independence is slacking outside and inside the House.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">We saw it earlier when M.F. Husain&rsquo;s naked Saraswati became offensive. Someone should have loudly read out Adi Shankara&rsquo;s Soundarya Lahiri, where the high priest of Hinduism gloriously describes a goddess in graphic detail, which Basheer, for one, would have widely grinned at. Now, before Shankar&rsquo;s cartoon is hastily bundled away by Kapil Sibal, Pranab Mukherjee and the rest of our parliamentarians, there is no debate on cartoon as art in the House. Instead, there is a bewildering consensus to delete what they believe is irreverent. They don&rsquo;t find the need to appreciate it or argue with it &mdash; that would indeed be trying. It is far easier to bin it or ban it.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">We bleep &ldquo;offensive&rdquo; words, clothe our gods as though there is a textile factory in the heavens and bring out a beef-less menu. A nation that yanks out all offence &mdash; real and perceived &mdash; is a limited democracy.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But has our daily political cartoon too become mellow with time, lost its instinct to shock, shake us by the shoulders? Has the tactile fury left the pen &mdash; the one you could immediately sense in the stork-like nose of Abu Abraham&rsquo;s Indira Gandhi or even O.V. Vijayan&rsquo;s porcine Indira &mdash; leading West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee to conclude that all art should be like hers or the soothing Rabindra Sangeet that she insists should blare out of every street corner in Kolkata these days? She should take a look at Vijayan&rsquo;s cartoon &mdash; where Mrs Gandhi with a snout, following the fall of the Morarji Desai government, sits with a piggish Charan Singh and Jagjivan Ram &mdash; before crying murder at a cartoon that is a redux of a Satyajit Ray shot. Rest assured, if Congress stalwarts &ldquo;discover&rdquo; Vijayan&rsquo;s cartoon now, there could be a retrospective ban on it as well.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This is the enthusiasm of our political class to elide narratives other than the ones they have whetted and approved, much like the stamp of the censor&rsquo;s seal and signature during the Emergency. It was there when Abhishek Singhvi worked overtime to ensure that the English translation of Javier Moro&rsquo;s biography of Sonia Gandhi never got published in India. It is there in the stone gardens of Mayawati &mdash; a narcissistic love for monologues and monoliths that has taken the shape of statues that she got built of herself, B.R. Ambedkar and Kanshi Ram &mdash; and in her intolerance for a few laugh lines for which Shankar did not evidently seek her permission. The intense coddling of the self, to control the narrative, no questions asked, is there even in Rahul Gandhi&rsquo;s refusal to engage with the media.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">We are all turning into a collective that not only clicks but also seeks Facebook&rsquo;s Like sign to every comment. We are all guilty of creating a quiescent, question-less environment.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Here is a mediocre poem. &ldquo;Teachers have space/ and years to sculpt/ to mould, to carve/ to paint with ease. Give vision to/ blindfolded minds/ contour new paths/ for curious eyes.&rdquo; It is published without controversy. It is safe. It is staid. It is like a Class VII essay on Teacher&rsquo;s Day cut evenly to wear the look of verse. It is Kapil Sibal&rsquo;s. Thankfully for him, and Mamata Banerjee, that pedestrian painter of swirling flowers and wide eyes, our ministers and chief ministers are not expected to be great artists. But they are expected to let ideas be, let the arts be &mdash; even such things as satire that they seem to have some trouble understanding.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 15101, 'title' => 'Bin it or ban it-Charmy Harikrishnan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>The cartoon controversy shows the enthusiasm of our political class to create a quiescent, question-less environment</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The year was 1967. Vaikkom Muhammad Basheer had published a story &mdash; in Malayalam, of course &mdash; called Oru Bhagavad Gitayum Kure Mulakalum (A Bhagavad Gita and a Few Breasts). This Muslim was having good fun, writing about getting hold of a new edition of the Gita and watching a procession of half-naked nubile Nair girls. Don&rsquo;t ask what possible connection could be between the two incidents. This is Basheer. And he is the master of meanderings and benign mockery. In 2012, Basheer would have had to look for another title; the very conjunction would be considered blasphemous. And perhaps write another story as well. Our censoring reflexes have become so fine-tuned, and our sense of satire so pitiable, that we would have blacklisted Basheer. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Ours is the golden age of communication. There are more books published than ever before. There are more Facebook posts, blogs and tweets creating corridors of instant discourse. But there is a greater fear too &mdash; of ideas, of books, paintings, websites and now, cartoons. And the call to bury them, which has come from fringe elements, seems to be increasingly echoed by politicians. This is dangerous, because while our intellectuals tend to talk among themselves in intellectual-ese, it is the enlightened representatives of people who should publicly stand as the defenders of democracy. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> When censorship is imposed under the cloak of political correctness &mdash; precluding dissent and debate, interring ridicule and irreverence &mdash; and tolerated, it shows the inanity of our age as well. Between retweeting and clicking the Like button, we seem to be collectively losing the tools of argument &mdash; a sense of history and a handle on multiple narratives. In our First Amendment-less country, the &ldquo;right to free speech and expression&rdquo; is no longer effective enough. And our liberal sinew to protect intellectual independence is slacking outside and inside the House. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> We saw it earlier when M.F. Husain&rsquo;s naked Saraswati became offensive. Someone should have loudly read out Adi Shankara&rsquo;s Soundarya Lahiri, where the high priest of Hinduism gloriously describes a goddess in graphic detail, which Basheer, for one, would have widely grinned at. Now, before Shankar&rsquo;s cartoon is hastily bundled away by Kapil Sibal, Pranab Mukherjee and the rest of our parliamentarians, there is no debate on cartoon as art in the House. Instead, there is a bewildering consensus to delete what they believe is irreverent. They don&rsquo;t find the need to appreciate it or argue with it &mdash; that would indeed be trying. It is far easier to bin it or ban it. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> We bleep &ldquo;offensive&rdquo; words, clothe our gods as though there is a textile factory in the heavens and bring out a beef-less menu. A nation that yanks out all offence &mdash; real and perceived &mdash; is a limited democracy. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But has our daily political cartoon too become mellow with time, lost its instinct to shock, shake us by the shoulders? Has the tactile fury left the pen &mdash; the one you could immediately sense in the stork-like nose of Abu Abraham&rsquo;s Indira Gandhi or even O.V. Vijayan&rsquo;s porcine Indira &mdash; leading West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee to conclude that all art should be like hers or the soothing Rabindra Sangeet that she insists should blare out of every street corner in Kolkata these days? She should take a look at Vijayan&rsquo;s cartoon &mdash; where Mrs Gandhi with a snout, following the fall of the Morarji Desai government, sits with a piggish Charan Singh and Jagjivan Ram &mdash; before crying murder at a cartoon that is a redux of a Satyajit Ray shot. Rest assured, if Congress stalwarts &ldquo;discover&rdquo; Vijayan&rsquo;s cartoon now, there could be a retrospective ban on it as well. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This is the enthusiasm of our political class to elide narratives other than the ones they have whetted and approved, much like the stamp of the censor&rsquo;s seal and signature during the Emergency. It was there when Abhishek Singhvi worked overtime to ensure that the English translation of Javier Moro&rsquo;s biography of Sonia Gandhi never got published in India. It is there in the stone gardens of Mayawati &mdash; a narcissistic love for monologues and monoliths that has taken the shape of statues that she got built of herself, B.R. Ambedkar and Kanshi Ram &mdash; and in her intolerance for a few laugh lines for which Shankar did not evidently seek her permission. The intense coddling of the self, to control the narrative, no questions asked, is there even in Rahul Gandhi&rsquo;s refusal to engage with the media. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> We are all turning into a collective that not only clicks but also seeks Facebook&rsquo;s Like sign to every comment. We are all guilty of creating a quiescent, question-less environment. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Here is a mediocre poem. &ldquo;Teachers have space/ and years to sculpt/ to mould, to carve/ to paint with ease. Give vision to/ blindfolded minds/ contour new paths/ for curious eyes.&rdquo; It is published without controversy. It is safe. It is staid. It is like a Class VII essay on Teacher&rsquo;s Day cut evenly to wear the look of verse. It is Kapil Sibal&rsquo;s. Thankfully for him, and Mamata Banerjee, that pedestrian painter of swirling flowers and wide eyes, our ministers and chief ministers are not expected to be great artists. But they are expected to let ideas be, let the arts be &mdash; even such things as satire that they seem to have some trouble understanding. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 18 May, 2012, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/bin-it-or-ban-it/950686/0', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'bin-it-or-ban-it-charmy-harikrishnan-15226', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 15226, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 15101 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Bin it or ban it-Charmy Harikrishnan' $metaKeywords = 'cartoon,Freedom of Speech' $metaDesc = ' The cartoon controversy shows the enthusiasm of our political class to create a quiescent, question-less environment The year was 1967. Vaikkom Muhammad Basheer had published a story &mdash; in Malayalam, of course &mdash; called Oru Bhagavad Gitayum Kure Mulakalum (A Bhagavad...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>The cartoon controversy shows the enthusiasm of our political class to create a quiescent, question-less environment</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The year was 1967. Vaikkom Muhammad Basheer had published a story &mdash; in Malayalam, of course &mdash; called Oru Bhagavad Gitayum Kure Mulakalum (A Bhagavad Gita and a Few Breasts). This Muslim was having good fun, writing about getting hold of a new edition of the Gita and watching a procession of half-naked nubile Nair girls. Don&rsquo;t ask what possible connection could be between the two incidents. This is Basheer. And he is the master of meanderings and benign mockery. In 2012, Basheer would have had to look for another title; the very conjunction would be considered blasphemous. And perhaps write another story as well. Our censoring reflexes have become so fine-tuned, and our sense of satire so pitiable, that we would have blacklisted Basheer.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Ours is the golden age of communication. There are more books published than ever before. There are more Facebook posts, blogs and tweets creating corridors of instant discourse. But there is a greater fear too &mdash; of ideas, of books, paintings, websites and now, cartoons. And the call to bury them, which has come from fringe elements, seems to be increasingly echoed by politicians. This is dangerous, because while our intellectuals tend to talk among themselves in intellectual-ese, it is the enlightened representatives of people who should publicly stand as the defenders of democracy.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">When censorship is imposed under the cloak of political correctness &mdash; precluding dissent and debate, interring ridicule and irreverence &mdash; and tolerated, it shows the inanity of our age as well. Between retweeting and clicking the Like button, we seem to be collectively losing the tools of argument &mdash; a sense of history and a handle on multiple narratives. In our First Amendment-less country, the &ldquo;right to free speech and expression&rdquo; is no longer effective enough. And our liberal sinew to protect intellectual independence is slacking outside and inside the House.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">We saw it earlier when M.F. Husain&rsquo;s naked Saraswati became offensive. Someone should have loudly read out Adi Shankara&rsquo;s Soundarya Lahiri, where the high priest of Hinduism gloriously describes a goddess in graphic detail, which Basheer, for one, would have widely grinned at. Now, before Shankar&rsquo;s cartoon is hastily bundled away by Kapil Sibal, Pranab Mukherjee and the rest of our parliamentarians, there is no debate on cartoon as art in the House. Instead, there is a bewildering consensus to delete what they believe is irreverent. They don&rsquo;t find the need to appreciate it or argue with it &mdash; that would indeed be trying. It is far easier to bin it or ban it.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">We bleep &ldquo;offensive&rdquo; words, clothe our gods as though there is a textile factory in the heavens and bring out a beef-less menu. A nation that yanks out all offence &mdash; real and perceived &mdash; is a limited democracy.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But has our daily political cartoon too become mellow with time, lost its instinct to shock, shake us by the shoulders? Has the tactile fury left the pen &mdash; the one you could immediately sense in the stork-like nose of Abu Abraham&rsquo;s Indira Gandhi or even O.V. Vijayan&rsquo;s porcine Indira &mdash; leading West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee to conclude that all art should be like hers or the soothing Rabindra Sangeet that she insists should blare out of every street corner in Kolkata these days? She should take a look at Vijayan&rsquo;s cartoon &mdash; where Mrs Gandhi with a snout, following the fall of the Morarji Desai government, sits with a piggish Charan Singh and Jagjivan Ram &mdash; before crying murder at a cartoon that is a redux of a Satyajit Ray shot. Rest assured, if Congress stalwarts &ldquo;discover&rdquo; Vijayan&rsquo;s cartoon now, there could be a retrospective ban on it as well.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This is the enthusiasm of our political class to elide narratives other than the ones they have whetted and approved, much like the stamp of the censor&rsquo;s seal and signature during the Emergency. It was there when Abhishek Singhvi worked overtime to ensure that the English translation of Javier Moro&rsquo;s biography of Sonia Gandhi never got published in India. It is there in the stone gardens of Mayawati &mdash; a narcissistic love for monologues and monoliths that has taken the shape of statues that she got built of herself, B.R. Ambedkar and Kanshi Ram &mdash; and in her intolerance for a few laugh lines for which Shankar did not evidently seek her permission. The intense coddling of the self, to control the narrative, no questions asked, is there even in Rahul Gandhi&rsquo;s refusal to engage with the media.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">We are all turning into a collective that not only clicks but also seeks Facebook&rsquo;s Like sign to every comment. We are all guilty of creating a quiescent, question-less environment.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Here is a mediocre poem. &ldquo;Teachers have space/ and years to sculpt/ to mould, to carve/ to paint with ease. Give vision to/ blindfolded minds/ contour new paths/ for curious eyes.&rdquo; It is published without controversy. It is safe. It is staid. It is like a Class VII essay on Teacher&rsquo;s Day cut evenly to wear the look of verse. It is Kapil Sibal&rsquo;s. Thankfully for him, and Mamata Banerjee, that pedestrian painter of swirling flowers and wide eyes, our ministers and chief ministers are not expected to be great artists. But they are expected to let ideas be, let the arts be &mdash; even such things as satire that they seem to have some trouble understanding.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/bin-it-or-ban-it-charmy-harikrishnan-15226.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Bin it or ban it-Charmy Harikrishnan | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" The cartoon controversy shows the enthusiasm of our political class to create a quiescent, question-less environment The year was 1967. Vaikkom Muhammad Basheer had published a story — in Malayalam, of course — called Oru Bhagavad Gitayum Kure Mulakalum (A Bhagavad..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Bin it or ban it-Charmy Harikrishnan</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>The cartoon controversy shows the enthusiasm of our political class to create a quiescent, question-less environment</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The year was 1967. Vaikkom Muhammad Basheer had published a story — in Malayalam, of course — called Oru Bhagavad Gitayum Kure Mulakalum (A Bhagavad Gita and a Few Breasts). This Muslim was having good fun, writing about getting hold of a new edition of the Gita and watching a procession of half-naked nubile Nair girls. Don’t ask what possible connection could be between the two incidents. This is Basheer. And he is the master of meanderings and benign mockery. In 2012, Basheer would have had to look for another title; the very conjunction would be considered blasphemous. And perhaps write another story as well. Our censoring reflexes have become so fine-tuned, and our sense of satire so pitiable, that we would have blacklisted Basheer.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Ours is the golden age of communication. There are more books published than ever before. There are more Facebook posts, blogs and tweets creating corridors of instant discourse. But there is a greater fear too — of ideas, of books, paintings, websites and now, cartoons. And the call to bury them, which has come from fringe elements, seems to be increasingly echoed by politicians. This is dangerous, because while our intellectuals tend to talk among themselves in intellectual-ese, it is the enlightened representatives of people who should publicly stand as the defenders of democracy.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">When censorship is imposed under the cloak of political correctness — precluding dissent and debate, interring ridicule and irreverence — and tolerated, it shows the inanity of our age as well. Between retweeting and clicking the Like button, we seem to be collectively losing the tools of argument — a sense of history and a handle on multiple narratives. In our First Amendment-less country, the “right to free speech and expression” is no longer effective enough. And our liberal sinew to protect intellectual independence is slacking outside and inside the House.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">We saw it earlier when M.F. Husain’s naked Saraswati became offensive. Someone should have loudly read out Adi Shankara’s Soundarya Lahiri, where the high priest of Hinduism gloriously describes a goddess in graphic detail, which Basheer, for one, would have widely grinned at. Now, before Shankar’s cartoon is hastily bundled away by Kapil Sibal, Pranab Mukherjee and the rest of our parliamentarians, there is no debate on cartoon as art in the House. Instead, there is a bewildering consensus to delete what they believe is irreverent. They don’t find the need to appreciate it or argue with it — that would indeed be trying. It is far easier to bin it or ban it.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">We bleep “offensive” words, clothe our gods as though there is a textile factory in the heavens and bring out a beef-less menu. A nation that yanks out all offence — real and perceived — is a limited democracy.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But has our daily political cartoon too become mellow with time, lost its instinct to shock, shake us by the shoulders? Has the tactile fury left the pen — the one you could immediately sense in the stork-like nose of Abu Abraham’s Indira Gandhi or even O.V. Vijayan’s porcine Indira — leading West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee to conclude that all art should be like hers or the soothing Rabindra Sangeet that she insists should blare out of every street corner in Kolkata these days? She should take a look at Vijayan’s cartoon — where Mrs Gandhi with a snout, following the fall of the Morarji Desai government, sits with a piggish Charan Singh and Jagjivan Ram — before crying murder at a cartoon that is a redux of a Satyajit Ray shot. Rest assured, if Congress stalwarts “discover” Vijayan’s cartoon now, there could be a retrospective ban on it as well.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This is the enthusiasm of our political class to elide narratives other than the ones they have whetted and approved, much like the stamp of the censor’s seal and signature during the Emergency. It was there when Abhishek Singhvi worked overtime to ensure that the English translation of Javier Moro’s biography of Sonia Gandhi never got published in India. It is there in the stone gardens of Mayawati — a narcissistic love for monologues and monoliths that has taken the shape of statues that she got built of herself, B.R. Ambedkar and Kanshi Ram — and in her intolerance for a few laugh lines for which Shankar did not evidently seek her permission. The intense coddling of the self, to control the narrative, no questions asked, is there even in Rahul Gandhi’s refusal to engage with the media.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">We are all turning into a collective that not only clicks but also seeks Facebook’s Like sign to every comment. We are all guilty of creating a quiescent, question-less environment.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Here is a mediocre poem. “Teachers have space/ and years to sculpt/ to mould, to carve/ to paint with ease. Give vision to/ blindfolded minds/ contour new paths/ for curious eyes.” It is published without controversy. It is safe. It is staid. It is like a Class VII essay on Teacher’s Day cut evenly to wear the look of verse. It is Kapil Sibal’s. Thankfully for him, and Mamata Banerjee, that pedestrian painter of swirling flowers and wide eyes, our ministers and chief ministers are not expected to be great artists. But they are expected to let ideas be, let the arts be — even such things as satire that they seem to have some trouble understanding.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea10c82a74b-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea10c82a74b-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67ea10c82a74b-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea10c82a74b-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea10c82a74b-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea10c82a74b-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea10c82a74b-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67ea10c82a74b-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67ea10c82a74b-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 15101, 'title' => 'Bin it or ban it-Charmy Harikrishnan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>The cartoon controversy shows the enthusiasm of our political class to create a quiescent, question-less environment</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The year was 1967. Vaikkom Muhammad Basheer had published a story &mdash; in Malayalam, of course &mdash; called Oru Bhagavad Gitayum Kure Mulakalum (A Bhagavad Gita and a Few Breasts). This Muslim was having good fun, writing about getting hold of a new edition of the Gita and watching a procession of half-naked nubile Nair girls. Don&rsquo;t ask what possible connection could be between the two incidents. This is Basheer. And he is the master of meanderings and benign mockery. In 2012, Basheer would have had to look for another title; the very conjunction would be considered blasphemous. And perhaps write another story as well. Our censoring reflexes have become so fine-tuned, and our sense of satire so pitiable, that we would have blacklisted Basheer. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Ours is the golden age of communication. There are more books published than ever before. There are more Facebook posts, blogs and tweets creating corridors of instant discourse. But there is a greater fear too &mdash; of ideas, of books, paintings, websites and now, cartoons. And the call to bury them, which has come from fringe elements, seems to be increasingly echoed by politicians. This is dangerous, because while our intellectuals tend to talk among themselves in intellectual-ese, it is the enlightened representatives of people who should publicly stand as the defenders of democracy. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> When censorship is imposed under the cloak of political correctness &mdash; precluding dissent and debate, interring ridicule and irreverence &mdash; and tolerated, it shows the inanity of our age as well. Between retweeting and clicking the Like button, we seem to be collectively losing the tools of argument &mdash; a sense of history and a handle on multiple narratives. In our First Amendment-less country, the &ldquo;right to free speech and expression&rdquo; is no longer effective enough. And our liberal sinew to protect intellectual independence is slacking outside and inside the House. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> We saw it earlier when M.F. Husain&rsquo;s naked Saraswati became offensive. Someone should have loudly read out Adi Shankara&rsquo;s Soundarya Lahiri, where the high priest of Hinduism gloriously describes a goddess in graphic detail, which Basheer, for one, would have widely grinned at. Now, before Shankar&rsquo;s cartoon is hastily bundled away by Kapil Sibal, Pranab Mukherjee and the rest of our parliamentarians, there is no debate on cartoon as art in the House. Instead, there is a bewildering consensus to delete what they believe is irreverent. They don&rsquo;t find the need to appreciate it or argue with it &mdash; that would indeed be trying. It is far easier to bin it or ban it. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> We bleep &ldquo;offensive&rdquo; words, clothe our gods as though there is a textile factory in the heavens and bring out a beef-less menu. A nation that yanks out all offence &mdash; real and perceived &mdash; is a limited democracy. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But has our daily political cartoon too become mellow with time, lost its instinct to shock, shake us by the shoulders? Has the tactile fury left the pen &mdash; the one you could immediately sense in the stork-like nose of Abu Abraham&rsquo;s Indira Gandhi or even O.V. Vijayan&rsquo;s porcine Indira &mdash; leading West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee to conclude that all art should be like hers or the soothing Rabindra Sangeet that she insists should blare out of every street corner in Kolkata these days? She should take a look at Vijayan&rsquo;s cartoon &mdash; where Mrs Gandhi with a snout, following the fall of the Morarji Desai government, sits with a piggish Charan Singh and Jagjivan Ram &mdash; before crying murder at a cartoon that is a redux of a Satyajit Ray shot. Rest assured, if Congress stalwarts &ldquo;discover&rdquo; Vijayan&rsquo;s cartoon now, there could be a retrospective ban on it as well. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This is the enthusiasm of our political class to elide narratives other than the ones they have whetted and approved, much like the stamp of the censor&rsquo;s seal and signature during the Emergency. It was there when Abhishek Singhvi worked overtime to ensure that the English translation of Javier Moro&rsquo;s biography of Sonia Gandhi never got published in India. It is there in the stone gardens of Mayawati &mdash; a narcissistic love for monologues and monoliths that has taken the shape of statues that she got built of herself, B.R. Ambedkar and Kanshi Ram &mdash; and in her intolerance for a few laugh lines for which Shankar did not evidently seek her permission. The intense coddling of the self, to control the narrative, no questions asked, is there even in Rahul Gandhi&rsquo;s refusal to engage with the media. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> We are all turning into a collective that not only clicks but also seeks Facebook&rsquo;s Like sign to every comment. We are all guilty of creating a quiescent, question-less environment. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Here is a mediocre poem. &ldquo;Teachers have space/ and years to sculpt/ to mould, to carve/ to paint with ease. Give vision to/ blindfolded minds/ contour new paths/ for curious eyes.&rdquo; It is published without controversy. It is safe. It is staid. It is like a Class VII essay on Teacher&rsquo;s Day cut evenly to wear the look of verse. It is Kapil Sibal&rsquo;s. Thankfully for him, and Mamata Banerjee, that pedestrian painter of swirling flowers and wide eyes, our ministers and chief ministers are not expected to be great artists. But they are expected to let ideas be, let the arts be &mdash; even such things as satire that they seem to have some trouble understanding. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 18 May, 2012, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/bin-it-or-ban-it/950686/0', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'bin-it-or-ban-it-charmy-harikrishnan-15226', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 15226, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 15101, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Bin it or ban it-Charmy Harikrishnan', 'metaKeywords' => 'cartoon,Freedom of Speech', 'metaDesc' => ' The cartoon controversy shows the enthusiasm of our political class to create a quiescent, question-less environment The year was 1967. Vaikkom Muhammad Basheer had published a story &mdash; in Malayalam, of course &mdash; called Oru Bhagavad Gitayum Kure Mulakalum (A Bhagavad...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>The cartoon controversy shows the enthusiasm of our political class to create a quiescent, question-less environment</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The year was 1967. Vaikkom Muhammad Basheer had published a story &mdash; in Malayalam, of course &mdash; called Oru Bhagavad Gitayum Kure Mulakalum (A Bhagavad Gita and a Few Breasts). This Muslim was having good fun, writing about getting hold of a new edition of the Gita and watching a procession of half-naked nubile Nair girls. Don&rsquo;t ask what possible connection could be between the two incidents. This is Basheer. And he is the master of meanderings and benign mockery. In 2012, Basheer would have had to look for another title; the very conjunction would be considered blasphemous. And perhaps write another story as well. Our censoring reflexes have become so fine-tuned, and our sense of satire so pitiable, that we would have blacklisted Basheer.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Ours is the golden age of communication. There are more books published than ever before. There are more Facebook posts, blogs and tweets creating corridors of instant discourse. But there is a greater fear too &mdash; of ideas, of books, paintings, websites and now, cartoons. And the call to bury them, which has come from fringe elements, seems to be increasingly echoed by politicians. This is dangerous, because while our intellectuals tend to talk among themselves in intellectual-ese, it is the enlightened representatives of people who should publicly stand as the defenders of democracy.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">When censorship is imposed under the cloak of political correctness &mdash; precluding dissent and debate, interring ridicule and irreverence &mdash; and tolerated, it shows the inanity of our age as well. Between retweeting and clicking the Like button, we seem to be collectively losing the tools of argument &mdash; a sense of history and a handle on multiple narratives. In our First Amendment-less country, the &ldquo;right to free speech and expression&rdquo; is no longer effective enough. And our liberal sinew to protect intellectual independence is slacking outside and inside the House.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">We saw it earlier when M.F. Husain&rsquo;s naked Saraswati became offensive. Someone should have loudly read out Adi Shankara&rsquo;s Soundarya Lahiri, where the high priest of Hinduism gloriously describes a goddess in graphic detail, which Basheer, for one, would have widely grinned at. Now, before Shankar&rsquo;s cartoon is hastily bundled away by Kapil Sibal, Pranab Mukherjee and the rest of our parliamentarians, there is no debate on cartoon as art in the House. Instead, there is a bewildering consensus to delete what they believe is irreverent. They don&rsquo;t find the need to appreciate it or argue with it &mdash; that would indeed be trying. It is far easier to bin it or ban it.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">We bleep &ldquo;offensive&rdquo; words, clothe our gods as though there is a textile factory in the heavens and bring out a beef-less menu. A nation that yanks out all offence &mdash; real and perceived &mdash; is a limited democracy.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But has our daily political cartoon too become mellow with time, lost its instinct to shock, shake us by the shoulders? Has the tactile fury left the pen &mdash; the one you could immediately sense in the stork-like nose of Abu Abraham&rsquo;s Indira Gandhi or even O.V. Vijayan&rsquo;s porcine Indira &mdash; leading West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee to conclude that all art should be like hers or the soothing Rabindra Sangeet that she insists should blare out of every street corner in Kolkata these days? She should take a look at Vijayan&rsquo;s cartoon &mdash; where Mrs Gandhi with a snout, following the fall of the Morarji Desai government, sits with a piggish Charan Singh and Jagjivan Ram &mdash; before crying murder at a cartoon that is a redux of a Satyajit Ray shot. Rest assured, if Congress stalwarts &ldquo;discover&rdquo; Vijayan&rsquo;s cartoon now, there could be a retrospective ban on it as well.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This is the enthusiasm of our political class to elide narratives other than the ones they have whetted and approved, much like the stamp of the censor&rsquo;s seal and signature during the Emergency. It was there when Abhishek Singhvi worked overtime to ensure that the English translation of Javier Moro&rsquo;s biography of Sonia Gandhi never got published in India. It is there in the stone gardens of Mayawati &mdash; a narcissistic love for monologues and monoliths that has taken the shape of statues that she got built of herself, B.R. Ambedkar and Kanshi Ram &mdash; and in her intolerance for a few laugh lines for which Shankar did not evidently seek her permission. The intense coddling of the self, to control the narrative, no questions asked, is there even in Rahul Gandhi&rsquo;s refusal to engage with the media.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">We are all turning into a collective that not only clicks but also seeks Facebook&rsquo;s Like sign to every comment. We are all guilty of creating a quiescent, question-less environment.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Here is a mediocre poem. &ldquo;Teachers have space/ and years to sculpt/ to mould, to carve/ to paint with ease. Give vision to/ blindfolded minds/ contour new paths/ for curious eyes.&rdquo; It is published without controversy. It is safe. It is staid. It is like a Class VII essay on Teacher&rsquo;s Day cut evenly to wear the look of verse. It is Kapil Sibal&rsquo;s. Thankfully for him, and Mamata Banerjee, that pedestrian painter of swirling flowers and wide eyes, our ministers and chief ministers are not expected to be great artists. But they are expected to let ideas be, let the arts be &mdash; even such things as satire that they seem to have some trouble understanding.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 15101, 'title' => 'Bin it or ban it-Charmy Harikrishnan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>The cartoon controversy shows the enthusiasm of our political class to create a quiescent, question-less environment</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The year was 1967. Vaikkom Muhammad Basheer had published a story &mdash; in Malayalam, of course &mdash; called Oru Bhagavad Gitayum Kure Mulakalum (A Bhagavad Gita and a Few Breasts). This Muslim was having good fun, writing about getting hold of a new edition of the Gita and watching a procession of half-naked nubile Nair girls. Don&rsquo;t ask what possible connection could be between the two incidents. This is Basheer. And he is the master of meanderings and benign mockery. In 2012, Basheer would have had to look for another title; the very conjunction would be considered blasphemous. And perhaps write another story as well. Our censoring reflexes have become so fine-tuned, and our sense of satire so pitiable, that we would have blacklisted Basheer. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Ours is the golden age of communication. There are more books published than ever before. There are more Facebook posts, blogs and tweets creating corridors of instant discourse. But there is a greater fear too &mdash; of ideas, of books, paintings, websites and now, cartoons. And the call to bury them, which has come from fringe elements, seems to be increasingly echoed by politicians. This is dangerous, because while our intellectuals tend to talk among themselves in intellectual-ese, it is the enlightened representatives of people who should publicly stand as the defenders of democracy. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> When censorship is imposed under the cloak of political correctness &mdash; precluding dissent and debate, interring ridicule and irreverence &mdash; and tolerated, it shows the inanity of our age as well. Between retweeting and clicking the Like button, we seem to be collectively losing the tools of argument &mdash; a sense of history and a handle on multiple narratives. In our First Amendment-less country, the &ldquo;right to free speech and expression&rdquo; is no longer effective enough. And our liberal sinew to protect intellectual independence is slacking outside and inside the House. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> We saw it earlier when M.F. Husain&rsquo;s naked Saraswati became offensive. Someone should have loudly read out Adi Shankara&rsquo;s Soundarya Lahiri, where the high priest of Hinduism gloriously describes a goddess in graphic detail, which Basheer, for one, would have widely grinned at. Now, before Shankar&rsquo;s cartoon is hastily bundled away by Kapil Sibal, Pranab Mukherjee and the rest of our parliamentarians, there is no debate on cartoon as art in the House. Instead, there is a bewildering consensus to delete what they believe is irreverent. They don&rsquo;t find the need to appreciate it or argue with it &mdash; that would indeed be trying. It is far easier to bin it or ban it. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> We bleep &ldquo;offensive&rdquo; words, clothe our gods as though there is a textile factory in the heavens and bring out a beef-less menu. A nation that yanks out all offence &mdash; real and perceived &mdash; is a limited democracy. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But has our daily political cartoon too become mellow with time, lost its instinct to shock, shake us by the shoulders? Has the tactile fury left the pen &mdash; the one you could immediately sense in the stork-like nose of Abu Abraham&rsquo;s Indira Gandhi or even O.V. Vijayan&rsquo;s porcine Indira &mdash; leading West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee to conclude that all art should be like hers or the soothing Rabindra Sangeet that she insists should blare out of every street corner in Kolkata these days? She should take a look at Vijayan&rsquo;s cartoon &mdash; where Mrs Gandhi with a snout, following the fall of the Morarji Desai government, sits with a piggish Charan Singh and Jagjivan Ram &mdash; before crying murder at a cartoon that is a redux of a Satyajit Ray shot. Rest assured, if Congress stalwarts &ldquo;discover&rdquo; Vijayan&rsquo;s cartoon now, there could be a retrospective ban on it as well. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This is the enthusiasm of our political class to elide narratives other than the ones they have whetted and approved, much like the stamp of the censor&rsquo;s seal and signature during the Emergency. It was there when Abhishek Singhvi worked overtime to ensure that the English translation of Javier Moro&rsquo;s biography of Sonia Gandhi never got published in India. It is there in the stone gardens of Mayawati &mdash; a narcissistic love for monologues and monoliths that has taken the shape of statues that she got built of herself, B.R. Ambedkar and Kanshi Ram &mdash; and in her intolerance for a few laugh lines for which Shankar did not evidently seek her permission. The intense coddling of the self, to control the narrative, no questions asked, is there even in Rahul Gandhi&rsquo;s refusal to engage with the media. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> We are all turning into a collective that not only clicks but also seeks Facebook&rsquo;s Like sign to every comment. We are all guilty of creating a quiescent, question-less environment. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Here is a mediocre poem. &ldquo;Teachers have space/ and years to sculpt/ to mould, to carve/ to paint with ease. Give vision to/ blindfolded minds/ contour new paths/ for curious eyes.&rdquo; It is published without controversy. It is safe. It is staid. It is like a Class VII essay on Teacher&rsquo;s Day cut evenly to wear the look of verse. It is Kapil Sibal&rsquo;s. Thankfully for him, and Mamata Banerjee, that pedestrian painter of swirling flowers and wide eyes, our ministers and chief ministers are not expected to be great artists. But they are expected to let ideas be, let the arts be &mdash; even such things as satire that they seem to have some trouble understanding. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 18 May, 2012, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/bin-it-or-ban-it/950686/0', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'bin-it-or-ban-it-charmy-harikrishnan-15226', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 15226, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 15101 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Bin it or ban it-Charmy Harikrishnan' $metaKeywords = 'cartoon,Freedom of Speech' $metaDesc = ' The cartoon controversy shows the enthusiasm of our political class to create a quiescent, question-less environment The year was 1967. Vaikkom Muhammad Basheer had published a story &mdash; in Malayalam, of course &mdash; called Oru Bhagavad Gitayum Kure Mulakalum (A Bhagavad...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>The cartoon controversy shows the enthusiasm of our political class to create a quiescent, question-less environment</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The year was 1967. Vaikkom Muhammad Basheer had published a story &mdash; in Malayalam, of course &mdash; called Oru Bhagavad Gitayum Kure Mulakalum (A Bhagavad Gita and a Few Breasts). This Muslim was having good fun, writing about getting hold of a new edition of the Gita and watching a procession of half-naked nubile Nair girls. Don&rsquo;t ask what possible connection could be between the two incidents. This is Basheer. And he is the master of meanderings and benign mockery. In 2012, Basheer would have had to look for another title; the very conjunction would be considered blasphemous. And perhaps write another story as well. Our censoring reflexes have become so fine-tuned, and our sense of satire so pitiable, that we would have blacklisted Basheer.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Ours is the golden age of communication. There are more books published than ever before. There are more Facebook posts, blogs and tweets creating corridors of instant discourse. But there is a greater fear too &mdash; of ideas, of books, paintings, websites and now, cartoons. And the call to bury them, which has come from fringe elements, seems to be increasingly echoed by politicians. This is dangerous, because while our intellectuals tend to talk among themselves in intellectual-ese, it is the enlightened representatives of people who should publicly stand as the defenders of democracy.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">When censorship is imposed under the cloak of political correctness &mdash; precluding dissent and debate, interring ridicule and irreverence &mdash; and tolerated, it shows the inanity of our age as well. Between retweeting and clicking the Like button, we seem to be collectively losing the tools of argument &mdash; a sense of history and a handle on multiple narratives. In our First Amendment-less country, the &ldquo;right to free speech and expression&rdquo; is no longer effective enough. And our liberal sinew to protect intellectual independence is slacking outside and inside the House.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">We saw it earlier when M.F. Husain&rsquo;s naked Saraswati became offensive. Someone should have loudly read out Adi Shankara&rsquo;s Soundarya Lahiri, where the high priest of Hinduism gloriously describes a goddess in graphic detail, which Basheer, for one, would have widely grinned at. Now, before Shankar&rsquo;s cartoon is hastily bundled away by Kapil Sibal, Pranab Mukherjee and the rest of our parliamentarians, there is no debate on cartoon as art in the House. Instead, there is a bewildering consensus to delete what they believe is irreverent. They don&rsquo;t find the need to appreciate it or argue with it &mdash; that would indeed be trying. It is far easier to bin it or ban it.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">We bleep &ldquo;offensive&rdquo; words, clothe our gods as though there is a textile factory in the heavens and bring out a beef-less menu. A nation that yanks out all offence &mdash; real and perceived &mdash; is a limited democracy.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But has our daily political cartoon too become mellow with time, lost its instinct to shock, shake us by the shoulders? Has the tactile fury left the pen &mdash; the one you could immediately sense in the stork-like nose of Abu Abraham&rsquo;s Indira Gandhi or even O.V. Vijayan&rsquo;s porcine Indira &mdash; leading West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee to conclude that all art should be like hers or the soothing Rabindra Sangeet that she insists should blare out of every street corner in Kolkata these days? She should take a look at Vijayan&rsquo;s cartoon &mdash; where Mrs Gandhi with a snout, following the fall of the Morarji Desai government, sits with a piggish Charan Singh and Jagjivan Ram &mdash; before crying murder at a cartoon that is a redux of a Satyajit Ray shot. Rest assured, if Congress stalwarts &ldquo;discover&rdquo; Vijayan&rsquo;s cartoon now, there could be a retrospective ban on it as well.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This is the enthusiasm of our political class to elide narratives other than the ones they have whetted and approved, much like the stamp of the censor&rsquo;s seal and signature during the Emergency. It was there when Abhishek Singhvi worked overtime to ensure that the English translation of Javier Moro&rsquo;s biography of Sonia Gandhi never got published in India. It is there in the stone gardens of Mayawati &mdash; a narcissistic love for monologues and monoliths that has taken the shape of statues that she got built of herself, B.R. Ambedkar and Kanshi Ram &mdash; and in her intolerance for a few laugh lines for which Shankar did not evidently seek her permission. The intense coddling of the self, to control the narrative, no questions asked, is there even in Rahul Gandhi&rsquo;s refusal to engage with the media.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">We are all turning into a collective that not only clicks but also seeks Facebook&rsquo;s Like sign to every comment. We are all guilty of creating a quiescent, question-less environment.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Here is a mediocre poem. &ldquo;Teachers have space/ and years to sculpt/ to mould, to carve/ to paint with ease. Give vision to/ blindfolded minds/ contour new paths/ for curious eyes.&rdquo; It is published without controversy. It is safe. It is staid. It is like a Class VII essay on Teacher&rsquo;s Day cut evenly to wear the look of verse. It is Kapil Sibal&rsquo;s. Thankfully for him, and Mamata Banerjee, that pedestrian painter of swirling flowers and wide eyes, our ministers and chief ministers are not expected to be great artists. But they are expected to let ideas be, let the arts be &mdash; even such things as satire that they seem to have some trouble understanding.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/bin-it-or-ban-it-charmy-harikrishnan-15226.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Bin it or ban it-Charmy Harikrishnan | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" The cartoon controversy shows the enthusiasm of our political class to create a quiescent, question-less environment The year was 1967. Vaikkom Muhammad Basheer had published a story — in Malayalam, of course — called Oru Bhagavad Gitayum Kure Mulakalum (A Bhagavad..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Bin it or ban it-Charmy Harikrishnan</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>The cartoon controversy shows the enthusiasm of our political class to create a quiescent, question-less environment</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The year was 1967. Vaikkom Muhammad Basheer had published a story — in Malayalam, of course — called Oru Bhagavad Gitayum Kure Mulakalum (A Bhagavad Gita and a Few Breasts). This Muslim was having good fun, writing about getting hold of a new edition of the Gita and watching a procession of half-naked nubile Nair girls. Don’t ask what possible connection could be between the two incidents. This is Basheer. And he is the master of meanderings and benign mockery. In 2012, Basheer would have had to look for another title; the very conjunction would be considered blasphemous. And perhaps write another story as well. Our censoring reflexes have become so fine-tuned, and our sense of satire so pitiable, that we would have blacklisted Basheer.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Ours is the golden age of communication. There are more books published than ever before. There are more Facebook posts, blogs and tweets creating corridors of instant discourse. But there is a greater fear too — of ideas, of books, paintings, websites and now, cartoons. And the call to bury them, which has come from fringe elements, seems to be increasingly echoed by politicians. This is dangerous, because while our intellectuals tend to talk among themselves in intellectual-ese, it is the enlightened representatives of people who should publicly stand as the defenders of democracy.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">When censorship is imposed under the cloak of political correctness — precluding dissent and debate, interring ridicule and irreverence — and tolerated, it shows the inanity of our age as well. Between retweeting and clicking the Like button, we seem to be collectively losing the tools of argument — a sense of history and a handle on multiple narratives. In our First Amendment-less country, the “right to free speech and expression” is no longer effective enough. And our liberal sinew to protect intellectual independence is slacking outside and inside the House.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">We saw it earlier when M.F. Husain’s naked Saraswati became offensive. Someone should have loudly read out Adi Shankara’s Soundarya Lahiri, where the high priest of Hinduism gloriously describes a goddess in graphic detail, which Basheer, for one, would have widely grinned at. Now, before Shankar’s cartoon is hastily bundled away by Kapil Sibal, Pranab Mukherjee and the rest of our parliamentarians, there is no debate on cartoon as art in the House. Instead, there is a bewildering consensus to delete what they believe is irreverent. They don’t find the need to appreciate it or argue with it — that would indeed be trying. It is far easier to bin it or ban it.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">We bleep “offensive” words, clothe our gods as though there is a textile factory in the heavens and bring out a beef-less menu. A nation that yanks out all offence — real and perceived — is a limited democracy.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But has our daily political cartoon too become mellow with time, lost its instinct to shock, shake us by the shoulders? Has the tactile fury left the pen — the one you could immediately sense in the stork-like nose of Abu Abraham’s Indira Gandhi or even O.V. Vijayan’s porcine Indira — leading West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee to conclude that all art should be like hers or the soothing Rabindra Sangeet that she insists should blare out of every street corner in Kolkata these days? She should take a look at Vijayan’s cartoon — where Mrs Gandhi with a snout, following the fall of the Morarji Desai government, sits with a piggish Charan Singh and Jagjivan Ram — before crying murder at a cartoon that is a redux of a Satyajit Ray shot. Rest assured, if Congress stalwarts “discover” Vijayan’s cartoon now, there could be a retrospective ban on it as well.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This is the enthusiasm of our political class to elide narratives other than the ones they have whetted and approved, much like the stamp of the censor’s seal and signature during the Emergency. It was there when Abhishek Singhvi worked overtime to ensure that the English translation of Javier Moro’s biography of Sonia Gandhi never got published in India. It is there in the stone gardens of Mayawati — a narcissistic love for monologues and monoliths that has taken the shape of statues that she got built of herself, B.R. Ambedkar and Kanshi Ram — and in her intolerance for a few laugh lines for which Shankar did not evidently seek her permission. The intense coddling of the self, to control the narrative, no questions asked, is there even in Rahul Gandhi’s refusal to engage with the media.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">We are all turning into a collective that not only clicks but also seeks Facebook’s Like sign to every comment. We are all guilty of creating a quiescent, question-less environment.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Here is a mediocre poem. “Teachers have space/ and years to sculpt/ to mould, to carve/ to paint with ease. Give vision to/ blindfolded minds/ contour new paths/ for curious eyes.” It is published without controversy. It is safe. It is staid. It is like a Class VII essay on Teacher’s Day cut evenly to wear the look of verse. It is Kapil Sibal’s. Thankfully for him, and Mamata Banerjee, that pedestrian painter of swirling flowers and wide eyes, our ministers and chief ministers are not expected to be great artists. But they are expected to let ideas be, let the arts be — even such things as satire that they seem to have some trouble understanding.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 15101, 'title' => 'Bin it or ban it-Charmy Harikrishnan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>The cartoon controversy shows the enthusiasm of our political class to create a quiescent, question-less environment</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The year was 1967. Vaikkom Muhammad Basheer had published a story — in Malayalam, of course — called Oru Bhagavad Gitayum Kure Mulakalum (A Bhagavad Gita and a Few Breasts). This Muslim was having good fun, writing about getting hold of a new edition of the Gita and watching a procession of half-naked nubile Nair girls. Don’t ask what possible connection could be between the two incidents. This is Basheer. And he is the master of meanderings and benign mockery. In 2012, Basheer would have had to look for another title; the very conjunction would be considered blasphemous. And perhaps write another story as well. Our censoring reflexes have become so fine-tuned, and our sense of satire so pitiable, that we would have blacklisted Basheer. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Ours is the golden age of communication. There are more books published than ever before. There are more Facebook posts, blogs and tweets creating corridors of instant discourse. But there is a greater fear too — of ideas, of books, paintings, websites and now, cartoons. And the call to bury them, which has come from fringe elements, seems to be increasingly echoed by politicians. This is dangerous, because while our intellectuals tend to talk among themselves in intellectual-ese, it is the enlightened representatives of people who should publicly stand as the defenders of democracy. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> When censorship is imposed under the cloak of political correctness — precluding dissent and debate, interring ridicule and irreverence — and tolerated, it shows the inanity of our age as well. Between retweeting and clicking the Like button, we seem to be collectively losing the tools of argument — a sense of history and a handle on multiple narratives. In our First Amendment-less country, the “right to free speech and expression” is no longer effective enough. And our liberal sinew to protect intellectual independence is slacking outside and inside the House. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> We saw it earlier when M.F. Husain’s naked Saraswati became offensive. Someone should have loudly read out Adi Shankara’s Soundarya Lahiri, where the high priest of Hinduism gloriously describes a goddess in graphic detail, which Basheer, for one, would have widely grinned at. Now, before Shankar’s cartoon is hastily bundled away by Kapil Sibal, Pranab Mukherjee and the rest of our parliamentarians, there is no debate on cartoon as art in the House. Instead, there is a bewildering consensus to delete what they believe is irreverent. They don’t find the need to appreciate it or argue with it — that would indeed be trying. It is far easier to bin it or ban it. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> We bleep “offensive” words, clothe our gods as though there is a textile factory in the heavens and bring out a beef-less menu. A nation that yanks out all offence — real and perceived — is a limited democracy. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But has our daily political cartoon too become mellow with time, lost its instinct to shock, shake us by the shoulders? Has the tactile fury left the pen — the one you could immediately sense in the stork-like nose of Abu Abraham’s Indira Gandhi or even O.V. Vijayan’s porcine Indira — leading West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee to conclude that all art should be like hers or the soothing Rabindra Sangeet that she insists should blare out of every street corner in Kolkata these days? She should take a look at Vijayan’s cartoon — where Mrs Gandhi with a snout, following the fall of the Morarji Desai government, sits with a piggish Charan Singh and Jagjivan Ram — before crying murder at a cartoon that is a redux of a Satyajit Ray shot. Rest assured, if Congress stalwarts “discover” Vijayan’s cartoon now, there could be a retrospective ban on it as well. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This is the enthusiasm of our political class to elide narratives other than the ones they have whetted and approved, much like the stamp of the censor’s seal and signature during the Emergency. It was there when Abhishek Singhvi worked overtime to ensure that the English translation of Javier Moro’s biography of Sonia Gandhi never got published in India. It is there in the stone gardens of Mayawati — a narcissistic love for monologues and monoliths that has taken the shape of statues that she got built of herself, B.R. Ambedkar and Kanshi Ram — and in her intolerance for a few laugh lines for which Shankar did not evidently seek her permission. The intense coddling of the self, to control the narrative, no questions asked, is there even in Rahul Gandhi’s refusal to engage with the media. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> We are all turning into a collective that not only clicks but also seeks Facebook’s Like sign to every comment. We are all guilty of creating a quiescent, question-less environment. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Here is a mediocre poem. “Teachers have space/ and years to sculpt/ to mould, to carve/ to paint with ease. Give vision to/ blindfolded minds/ contour new paths/ for curious eyes.” It is published without controversy. It is safe. It is staid. It is like a Class VII essay on Teacher’s Day cut evenly to wear the look of verse. It is Kapil Sibal’s. Thankfully for him, and Mamata Banerjee, that pedestrian painter of swirling flowers and wide eyes, our ministers and chief ministers are not expected to be great artists. But they are expected to let ideas be, let the arts be — even such things as satire that they seem to have some trouble understanding. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 18 May, 2012, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/bin-it-or-ban-it/950686/0', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'bin-it-or-ban-it-charmy-harikrishnan-15226', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 15226, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 15101, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Bin it or ban it-Charmy Harikrishnan', 'metaKeywords' => 'cartoon,Freedom of Speech', 'metaDesc' => ' The cartoon controversy shows the enthusiasm of our political class to create a quiescent, question-less environment The year was 1967. Vaikkom Muhammad Basheer had published a story — in Malayalam, of course — called Oru Bhagavad Gitayum Kure Mulakalum (A Bhagavad...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>The cartoon controversy shows the enthusiasm of our political class to create a quiescent, question-less environment</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The year was 1967. Vaikkom Muhammad Basheer had published a story — in Malayalam, of course — called Oru Bhagavad Gitayum Kure Mulakalum (A Bhagavad Gita and a Few Breasts). This Muslim was having good fun, writing about getting hold of a new edition of the Gita and watching a procession of half-naked nubile Nair girls. Don’t ask what possible connection could be between the two incidents. This is Basheer. And he is the master of meanderings and benign mockery. In 2012, Basheer would have had to look for another title; the very conjunction would be considered blasphemous. And perhaps write another story as well. Our censoring reflexes have become so fine-tuned, and our sense of satire so pitiable, that we would have blacklisted Basheer.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Ours is the golden age of communication. There are more books published than ever before. There are more Facebook posts, blogs and tweets creating corridors of instant discourse. But there is a greater fear too — of ideas, of books, paintings, websites and now, cartoons. And the call to bury them, which has come from fringe elements, seems to be increasingly echoed by politicians. This is dangerous, because while our intellectuals tend to talk among themselves in intellectual-ese, it is the enlightened representatives of people who should publicly stand as the defenders of democracy.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">When censorship is imposed under the cloak of political correctness — precluding dissent and debate, interring ridicule and irreverence — and tolerated, it shows the inanity of our age as well. Between retweeting and clicking the Like button, we seem to be collectively losing the tools of argument — a sense of history and a handle on multiple narratives. In our First Amendment-less country, the “right to free speech and expression” is no longer effective enough. And our liberal sinew to protect intellectual independence is slacking outside and inside the House.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">We saw it earlier when M.F. Husain’s naked Saraswati became offensive. Someone should have loudly read out Adi Shankara’s Soundarya Lahiri, where the high priest of Hinduism gloriously describes a goddess in graphic detail, which Basheer, for one, would have widely grinned at. Now, before Shankar’s cartoon is hastily bundled away by Kapil Sibal, Pranab Mukherjee and the rest of our parliamentarians, there is no debate on cartoon as art in the House. Instead, there is a bewildering consensus to delete what they believe is irreverent. They don’t find the need to appreciate it or argue with it — that would indeed be trying. It is far easier to bin it or ban it.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">We bleep “offensive” words, clothe our gods as though there is a textile factory in the heavens and bring out a beef-less menu. A nation that yanks out all offence — real and perceived — is a limited democracy.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But has our daily political cartoon too become mellow with time, lost its instinct to shock, shake us by the shoulders? Has the tactile fury left the pen — the one you could immediately sense in the stork-like nose of Abu Abraham’s Indira Gandhi or even O.V. Vijayan’s porcine Indira — leading West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee to conclude that all art should be like hers or the soothing Rabindra Sangeet that she insists should blare out of every street corner in Kolkata these days? She should take a look at Vijayan’s cartoon — where Mrs Gandhi with a snout, following the fall of the Morarji Desai government, sits with a piggish Charan Singh and Jagjivan Ram — before crying murder at a cartoon that is a redux of a Satyajit Ray shot. Rest assured, if Congress stalwarts “discover” Vijayan’s cartoon now, there could be a retrospective ban on it as well.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This is the enthusiasm of our political class to elide narratives other than the ones they have whetted and approved, much like the stamp of the censor’s seal and signature during the Emergency. It was there when Abhishek Singhvi worked overtime to ensure that the English translation of Javier Moro’s biography of Sonia Gandhi never got published in India. It is there in the stone gardens of Mayawati — a narcissistic love for monologues and monoliths that has taken the shape of statues that she got built of herself, B.R. Ambedkar and Kanshi Ram — and in her intolerance for a few laugh lines for which Shankar did not evidently seek her permission. The intense coddling of the self, to control the narrative, no questions asked, is there even in Rahul Gandhi’s refusal to engage with the media.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">We are all turning into a collective that not only clicks but also seeks Facebook’s Like sign to every comment. We are all guilty of creating a quiescent, question-less environment.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Here is a mediocre poem. “Teachers have space/ and years to sculpt/ to mould, to carve/ to paint with ease. Give vision to/ blindfolded minds/ contour new paths/ for curious eyes.” It is published without controversy. It is safe. It is staid. It is like a Class VII essay on Teacher’s Day cut evenly to wear the look of verse. It is Kapil Sibal’s. Thankfully for him, and Mamata Banerjee, that pedestrian painter of swirling flowers and wide eyes, our ministers and chief ministers are not expected to be great artists. But they are expected to let ideas be, let the arts be — even such things as satire that they seem to have some trouble understanding.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 15101, 'title' => 'Bin it or ban it-Charmy Harikrishnan', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <em>The cartoon controversy shows the enthusiasm of our political class to create a quiescent, question-less environment</em> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The year was 1967. Vaikkom Muhammad Basheer had published a story — in Malayalam, of course — called Oru Bhagavad Gitayum Kure Mulakalum (A Bhagavad Gita and a Few Breasts). This Muslim was having good fun, writing about getting hold of a new edition of the Gita and watching a procession of half-naked nubile Nair girls. Don’t ask what possible connection could be between the two incidents. This is Basheer. And he is the master of meanderings and benign mockery. In 2012, Basheer would have had to look for another title; the very conjunction would be considered blasphemous. And perhaps write another story as well. Our censoring reflexes have become so fine-tuned, and our sense of satire so pitiable, that we would have blacklisted Basheer. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Ours is the golden age of communication. There are more books published than ever before. There are more Facebook posts, blogs and tweets creating corridors of instant discourse. But there is a greater fear too — of ideas, of books, paintings, websites and now, cartoons. And the call to bury them, which has come from fringe elements, seems to be increasingly echoed by politicians. This is dangerous, because while our intellectuals tend to talk among themselves in intellectual-ese, it is the enlightened representatives of people who should publicly stand as the defenders of democracy. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> When censorship is imposed under the cloak of political correctness — precluding dissent and debate, interring ridicule and irreverence — and tolerated, it shows the inanity of our age as well. Between retweeting and clicking the Like button, we seem to be collectively losing the tools of argument — a sense of history and a handle on multiple narratives. In our First Amendment-less country, the “right to free speech and expression” is no longer effective enough. And our liberal sinew to protect intellectual independence is slacking outside and inside the House. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> We saw it earlier when M.F. Husain’s naked Saraswati became offensive. Someone should have loudly read out Adi Shankara’s Soundarya Lahiri, where the high priest of Hinduism gloriously describes a goddess in graphic detail, which Basheer, for one, would have widely grinned at. Now, before Shankar’s cartoon is hastily bundled away by Kapil Sibal, Pranab Mukherjee and the rest of our parliamentarians, there is no debate on cartoon as art in the House. Instead, there is a bewildering consensus to delete what they believe is irreverent. They don’t find the need to appreciate it or argue with it — that would indeed be trying. It is far easier to bin it or ban it. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> We bleep “offensive” words, clothe our gods as though there is a textile factory in the heavens and bring out a beef-less menu. A nation that yanks out all offence — real and perceived — is a limited democracy. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> But has our daily political cartoon too become mellow with time, lost its instinct to shock, shake us by the shoulders? Has the tactile fury left the pen — the one you could immediately sense in the stork-like nose of Abu Abraham’s Indira Gandhi or even O.V. Vijayan’s porcine Indira — leading West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee to conclude that all art should be like hers or the soothing Rabindra Sangeet that she insists should blare out of every street corner in Kolkata these days? She should take a look at Vijayan’s cartoon — where Mrs Gandhi with a snout, following the fall of the Morarji Desai government, sits with a piggish Charan Singh and Jagjivan Ram — before crying murder at a cartoon that is a redux of a Satyajit Ray shot. Rest assured, if Congress stalwarts “discover” Vijayan’s cartoon now, there could be a retrospective ban on it as well. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> This is the enthusiasm of our political class to elide narratives other than the ones they have whetted and approved, much like the stamp of the censor’s seal and signature during the Emergency. It was there when Abhishek Singhvi worked overtime to ensure that the English translation of Javier Moro’s biography of Sonia Gandhi never got published in India. It is there in the stone gardens of Mayawati — a narcissistic love for monologues and monoliths that has taken the shape of statues that she got built of herself, B.R. Ambedkar and Kanshi Ram — and in her intolerance for a few laugh lines for which Shankar did not evidently seek her permission. The intense coddling of the self, to control the narrative, no questions asked, is there even in Rahul Gandhi’s refusal to engage with the media. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> We are all turning into a collective that not only clicks but also seeks Facebook’s Like sign to every comment. We are all guilty of creating a quiescent, question-less environment. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Here is a mediocre poem. “Teachers have space/ and years to sculpt/ to mould, to carve/ to paint with ease. Give vision to/ blindfolded minds/ contour new paths/ for curious eyes.” It is published without controversy. It is safe. It is staid. It is like a Class VII essay on Teacher’s Day cut evenly to wear the look of verse. It is Kapil Sibal’s. Thankfully for him, and Mamata Banerjee, that pedestrian painter of swirling flowers and wide eyes, our ministers and chief ministers are not expected to be great artists. But they are expected to let ideas be, let the arts be — even such things as satire that they seem to have some trouble understanding. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 18 May, 2012, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/bin-it-or-ban-it/950686/0', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'bin-it-or-ban-it-charmy-harikrishnan-15226', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 15226, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 15101 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Bin it or ban it-Charmy Harikrishnan' $metaKeywords = 'cartoon,Freedom of Speech' $metaDesc = ' The cartoon controversy shows the enthusiasm of our political class to create a quiescent, question-less environment The year was 1967. Vaikkom Muhammad Basheer had published a story — in Malayalam, of course — called Oru Bhagavad Gitayum Kure Mulakalum (A Bhagavad...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify"><em>The cartoon controversy shows the enthusiasm of our political class to create a quiescent, question-less environment</em></div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The year was 1967. Vaikkom Muhammad Basheer had published a story — in Malayalam, of course — called Oru Bhagavad Gitayum Kure Mulakalum (A Bhagavad Gita and a Few Breasts). This Muslim was having good fun, writing about getting hold of a new edition of the Gita and watching a procession of half-naked nubile Nair girls. Don’t ask what possible connection could be between the two incidents. This is Basheer. And he is the master of meanderings and benign mockery. In 2012, Basheer would have had to look for another title; the very conjunction would be considered blasphemous. And perhaps write another story as well. Our censoring reflexes have become so fine-tuned, and our sense of satire so pitiable, that we would have blacklisted Basheer.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Ours is the golden age of communication. There are more books published than ever before. There are more Facebook posts, blogs and tweets creating corridors of instant discourse. But there is a greater fear too — of ideas, of books, paintings, websites and now, cartoons. And the call to bury them, which has come from fringe elements, seems to be increasingly echoed by politicians. This is dangerous, because while our intellectuals tend to talk among themselves in intellectual-ese, it is the enlightened representatives of people who should publicly stand as the defenders of democracy.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">When censorship is imposed under the cloak of political correctness — precluding dissent and debate, interring ridicule and irreverence — and tolerated, it shows the inanity of our age as well. Between retweeting and clicking the Like button, we seem to be collectively losing the tools of argument — a sense of history and a handle on multiple narratives. In our First Amendment-less country, the “right to free speech and expression” is no longer effective enough. And our liberal sinew to protect intellectual independence is slacking outside and inside the House.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">We saw it earlier when M.F. Husain’s naked Saraswati became offensive. Someone should have loudly read out Adi Shankara’s Soundarya Lahiri, where the high priest of Hinduism gloriously describes a goddess in graphic detail, which Basheer, for one, would have widely grinned at. Now, before Shankar’s cartoon is hastily bundled away by Kapil Sibal, Pranab Mukherjee and the rest of our parliamentarians, there is no debate on cartoon as art in the House. Instead, there is a bewildering consensus to delete what they believe is irreverent. They don’t find the need to appreciate it or argue with it — that would indeed be trying. It is far easier to bin it or ban it.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">We bleep “offensive” words, clothe our gods as though there is a textile factory in the heavens and bring out a beef-less menu. A nation that yanks out all offence — real and perceived — is a limited democracy.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">But has our daily political cartoon too become mellow with time, lost its instinct to shock, shake us by the shoulders? Has the tactile fury left the pen — the one you could immediately sense in the stork-like nose of Abu Abraham’s Indira Gandhi or even O.V. Vijayan’s porcine Indira — leading West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee to conclude that all art should be like hers or the soothing Rabindra Sangeet that she insists should blare out of every street corner in Kolkata these days? She should take a look at Vijayan’s cartoon — where Mrs Gandhi with a snout, following the fall of the Morarji Desai government, sits with a piggish Charan Singh and Jagjivan Ram — before crying murder at a cartoon that is a redux of a Satyajit Ray shot. Rest assured, if Congress stalwarts “discover” Vijayan’s cartoon now, there could be a retrospective ban on it as well.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">This is the enthusiasm of our political class to elide narratives other than the ones they have whetted and approved, much like the stamp of the censor’s seal and signature during the Emergency. It was there when Abhishek Singhvi worked overtime to ensure that the English translation of Javier Moro’s biography of Sonia Gandhi never got published in India. It is there in the stone gardens of Mayawati — a narcissistic love for monologues and monoliths that has taken the shape of statues that she got built of herself, B.R. Ambedkar and Kanshi Ram — and in her intolerance for a few laugh lines for which Shankar did not evidently seek her permission. The intense coddling of the self, to control the narrative, no questions asked, is there even in Rahul Gandhi’s refusal to engage with the media.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">We are all turning into a collective that not only clicks but also seeks Facebook’s Like sign to every comment. We are all guilty of creating a quiescent, question-less environment.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Here is a mediocre poem. “Teachers have space/ and years to sculpt/ to mould, to carve/ to paint with ease. Give vision to/ blindfolded minds/ contour new paths/ for curious eyes.” It is published without controversy. It is safe. It is staid. It is like a Class VII essay on Teacher’s Day cut evenly to wear the look of verse. It is Kapil Sibal’s. Thankfully for him, and Mamata Banerjee, that pedestrian painter of swirling flowers and wide eyes, our ministers and chief ministers are not expected to be great artists. But they are expected to let ideas be, let the arts be — even such things as satire that they seem to have some trouble understanding.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Bin it or ban it-Charmy Harikrishnan |
The cartoon controversy shows the enthusiasm of our political class to create a quiescent, question-less environment The year was 1967. Vaikkom Muhammad Basheer had published a story — in Malayalam, of course — called Oru Bhagavad Gitayum Kure Mulakalum (A Bhagavad Gita and a Few Breasts). This Muslim was having good fun, writing about getting hold of a new edition of the Gita and watching a procession of half-naked nubile Nair girls. Don’t ask what possible connection could be between the two incidents. This is Basheer. And he is the master of meanderings and benign mockery. In 2012, Basheer would have had to look for another title; the very conjunction would be considered blasphemous. And perhaps write another story as well. Our censoring reflexes have become so fine-tuned, and our sense of satire so pitiable, that we would have blacklisted Basheer. Ours is the golden age of communication. There are more books published than ever before. There are more Facebook posts, blogs and tweets creating corridors of instant discourse. But there is a greater fear too — of ideas, of books, paintings, websites and now, cartoons. And the call to bury them, which has come from fringe elements, seems to be increasingly echoed by politicians. This is dangerous, because while our intellectuals tend to talk among themselves in intellectual-ese, it is the enlightened representatives of people who should publicly stand as the defenders of democracy. When censorship is imposed under the cloak of political correctness — precluding dissent and debate, interring ridicule and irreverence — and tolerated, it shows the inanity of our age as well. Between retweeting and clicking the Like button, we seem to be collectively losing the tools of argument — a sense of history and a handle on multiple narratives. In our First Amendment-less country, the “right to free speech and expression” is no longer effective enough. And our liberal sinew to protect intellectual independence is slacking outside and inside the House. We saw it earlier when M.F. Husain’s naked Saraswati became offensive. Someone should have loudly read out Adi Shankara’s Soundarya Lahiri, where the high priest of Hinduism gloriously describes a goddess in graphic detail, which Basheer, for one, would have widely grinned at. Now, before Shankar’s cartoon is hastily bundled away by Kapil Sibal, Pranab Mukherjee and the rest of our parliamentarians, there is no debate on cartoon as art in the House. Instead, there is a bewildering consensus to delete what they believe is irreverent. They don’t find the need to appreciate it or argue with it — that would indeed be trying. It is far easier to bin it or ban it. We bleep “offensive” words, clothe our gods as though there is a textile factory in the heavens and bring out a beef-less menu. A nation that yanks out all offence — real and perceived — is a limited democracy. But has our daily political cartoon too become mellow with time, lost its instinct to shock, shake us by the shoulders? Has the tactile fury left the pen — the one you could immediately sense in the stork-like nose of Abu Abraham’s Indira Gandhi or even O.V. Vijayan’s porcine Indira — leading West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee to conclude that all art should be like hers or the soothing Rabindra Sangeet that she insists should blare out of every street corner in Kolkata these days? She should take a look at Vijayan’s cartoon — where Mrs Gandhi with a snout, following the fall of the Morarji Desai government, sits with a piggish Charan Singh and Jagjivan Ram — before crying murder at a cartoon that is a redux of a Satyajit Ray shot. Rest assured, if Congress stalwarts “discover” Vijayan’s cartoon now, there could be a retrospective ban on it as well. This is the enthusiasm of our political class to elide narratives other than the ones they have whetted and approved, much like the stamp of the censor’s seal and signature during the Emergency. It was there when Abhishek Singhvi worked overtime to ensure that the English translation of Javier Moro’s biography of Sonia Gandhi never got published in India. It is there in the stone gardens of Mayawati — a narcissistic love for monologues and monoliths that has taken the shape of statues that she got built of herself, B.R. Ambedkar and Kanshi Ram — and in her intolerance for a few laugh lines for which Shankar did not evidently seek her permission. The intense coddling of the self, to control the narrative, no questions asked, is there even in Rahul Gandhi’s refusal to engage with the media. We are all turning into a collective that not only clicks but also seeks Facebook’s Like sign to every comment. We are all guilty of creating a quiescent, question-less environment. Here is a mediocre poem. “Teachers have space/ and years to sculpt/ to mould, to carve/ to paint with ease. Give vision to/ blindfolded minds/ contour new paths/ for curious eyes.” It is published without controversy. It is safe. It is staid. It is like a Class VII essay on Teacher’s Day cut evenly to wear the look of verse. It is Kapil Sibal’s. Thankfully for him, and Mamata Banerjee, that pedestrian painter of swirling flowers and wide eyes, our ministers and chief ministers are not expected to be great artists. But they are expected to let ideas be, let the arts be — even such things as satire that they seem to have some trouble understanding.
|