Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/bjp-roots-for-jan-lokpal-in-u-turn-by-radhika-ramaseshan-9770/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/bjp-roots-for-jan-lokpal-in-u-turn-by-radhika-ramaseshan-9770/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/bjp-roots-for-jan-lokpal-in-u-turn-by-radhika-ramaseshan-9770/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/bjp-roots-for-jan-lokpal-in-u-turn-by-radhika-ramaseshan-9770/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68074a2873c87-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68074a2873c87-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68074a2873c87-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68074a2873c87-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68074a2873c87-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68074a2873c87-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68074a2873c87-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68074a2873c87-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68074a2873c87-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 9661,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;BJP roots for Jan Lokpal in U-turn by Radhika Ramaseshan&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The BJP today rooted for Anna Hazare&amp;rsquo;s version of the Lokpal bill, two days after it distanced itself from the draft, the somersault coming in a letter the party&amp;rsquo;s president wrote to the fasting activist.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;We have always been and are for a strong Lokpal,&amp;rdquo; Nitin Gadkari said in his letter. &amp;ldquo;For that to happen, (the) BJP accepts your Jan Lokpal bill to be the basis for a strong and effective Lokpal to be put in place at the earliest without getting into procedural wrangles.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The letter was written and despatched this evening by Gadkari&amp;rsquo;s colleagues Jagat Nadda and Vinay Sahasthrabuddhe hours after Hazare associate Arvind Kejriwal had publicly challenged the BJP to spell out its stand on the Jan Lokpal bill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A meeting of the BJP&amp;rsquo;s core committee that Gadkari chaired tonight placed its stamp of approval on his Jan Lokpal pitch. L.K. Advani, Sushma Swaraj and Arun Jaitley were among those who attended the meeting.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;Our demand is firstly the government should drop its Lokpal bill,&amp;rdquo; spokesperson Ravi Shankar Prasad said. &amp;ldquo;The bill that replaces it should reflect the general premises and sentiments of the Jan Lokpal bill.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bolstered by the BJP&amp;rsquo;s turnaround, Hazare&amp;rsquo;s associates Kejriwal, Prashant Bhushan and Kiran Bedi called on the BJP leaders late tonight at Advani&amp;rsquo;s residence. Sources said they expected to be reassured that the BJP would not veer from the stand it fashioned today when the Lokpal issue is debated in Parliament tomorrow.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The sources cited several reasons for Gadkari&amp;rsquo;s somersault. They said he was pressured by the RSS and a section of the BJP to take a more strident stand on Hazare&amp;rsquo;s fast after leaders like Yashwant Sinha and Shatrughan Sinha voiced concerns over the party yielding its political turf to &amp;ldquo;civil society&amp;rdquo; for &amp;ldquo;want of clarity&amp;rdquo; on the issue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Sangh and the BJP dissenters, the sources said, felt that the parliamentary strategists were going &amp;ldquo;soft&amp;rdquo; on the government. A national executive member, close to the RSS, said he was &amp;ldquo;unhappy&amp;rdquo; with Lok Sabha Opposition leader Sushma readily associating the BJP with the Prime Minister&amp;rsquo;s statement on the Hazare episode this morning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He wondered why the usually combative Sushma &amp;ldquo;allowed&amp;rdquo; Manmohan Singh to get away with his dare to the BJP to nail him on personal corruption.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;Nobody from our party suggested he was under a cloud. But as the UPA government&amp;rsquo;s watchman, he slept through the 2G, CWG and other big scams and this point was not made by Sushma,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is learnt that when Hazare brought up the BJP&amp;rsquo;s &amp;ldquo;fuzziness&amp;rdquo; with Gadkari&amp;rsquo;s colleagues, he was told that Sushma&amp;rsquo;s brief address at the all-party meeting Singh had convened yesterday was in sync with the party&amp;rsquo;s stand of supporting the Jan Lokpal bill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gadkari&amp;rsquo;s letter said Sushma had demanded that the government withdraw its Lokpal bill and supplant it with a more powerful one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To reinforce the message of &amp;ldquo;solidarity&amp;rdquo; with Hazare, Gadkari today floated a new outfit called the Yuva Vahini, which drew its cadres from the party&amp;rsquo;s youth wing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The cadres not only replenished the crowd at Ramlila Maidan but also picketed the Prime Minister&amp;rsquo;s residence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The sources, however, conceded that they had fewer differences with the government&amp;rsquo;s version than with the Jan Lokpal bill. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 26 August, 2011, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1110826/jsp/nation/story_14426851.jsp&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;bjp-roots-for-jan-lokpal-in-u-turn-by-radhika-ramaseshan-9770&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 9770,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 9661,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | BJP roots for Jan Lokpal in U-turn by Radhika Ramaseshan&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;lokpal bill&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;

The BJP today rooted for Anna Hazare&amp;rsquo;s version of the Lokpal bill, two days after it distanced itself from the draft, the somersault coming in a letter the party&amp;rsquo;s president wrote to the fasting activist.

&amp;ldquo;We have always been and are...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The BJP today rooted for Anna Hazare&amp;rsquo;s version of the Lokpal bill, two days after it distanced itself from the draft, the somersault coming in a letter the party&amp;rsquo;s president wrote to the fasting activist.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;We have always been and are for a strong Lokpal,&amp;rdquo; Nitin Gadkari said in his letter. &amp;ldquo;For that to happen, (the) BJP accepts your Jan Lokpal bill to be the basis for a strong and effective Lokpal to be put in place at the earliest without getting into procedural wrangles.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The letter was written and despatched this evening by Gadkari&amp;rsquo;s colleagues Jagat Nadda and Vinay Sahasthrabuddhe hours after Hazare associate Arvind Kejriwal had publicly challenged the BJP to spell out its stand on the Jan Lokpal bill.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A meeting of the BJP&amp;rsquo;s core committee that Gadkari chaired tonight placed its stamp of approval on his Jan Lokpal pitch. L.K. Advani, Sushma Swaraj and Arun Jaitley were among those who attended the meeting.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;Our demand is firstly the government should drop its Lokpal bill,&amp;rdquo; spokesperson Ravi Shankar Prasad said. &amp;ldquo;The bill that replaces it should reflect the general premises and sentiments of the Jan Lokpal bill.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Bolstered by the BJP&amp;rsquo;s turnaround, Hazare&amp;rsquo;s associates Kejriwal, Prashant Bhushan and Kiran Bedi called on the BJP leaders late tonight at Advani&amp;rsquo;s residence. Sources said they expected to be reassured that the BJP would not veer from the stand it fashioned today when the Lokpal issue is debated in Parliament tomorrow.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The sources cited several reasons for Gadkari&amp;rsquo;s somersault. They said he was pressured by the RSS and a section of the BJP to take a more strident stand on Hazare&amp;rsquo;s fast after leaders like Yashwant Sinha and Shatrughan Sinha voiced concerns over the party yielding its political turf to &amp;ldquo;civil society&amp;rdquo; for &amp;ldquo;want of clarity&amp;rdquo; on the issue.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Sangh and the BJP dissenters, the sources said, felt that the parliamentary strategists were going &amp;ldquo;soft&amp;rdquo; on the government. A national executive member, close to the RSS, said he was &amp;ldquo;unhappy&amp;rdquo; with Lok Sabha Opposition leader Sushma readily associating the BJP with the Prime Minister&amp;rsquo;s statement on the Hazare episode this morning.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He wondered why the usually combative Sushma &amp;ldquo;allowed&amp;rdquo; Manmohan Singh to get away with his dare to the BJP to nail him on personal corruption.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;Nobody from our party suggested he was under a cloud. But as the UPA government&amp;rsquo;s watchman, he slept through the 2G, CWG and other big scams and this point was not made by Sushma,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It is learnt that when Hazare brought up the BJP&amp;rsquo;s &amp;ldquo;fuzziness&amp;rdquo; with Gadkari&amp;rsquo;s colleagues, he was told that Sushma&amp;rsquo;s brief address at the all-party meeting Singh had convened yesterday was in sync with the party&amp;rsquo;s stand of supporting the Jan Lokpal bill.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Gadkari&amp;rsquo;s letter said Sushma had demanded that the government withdraw its Lokpal bill and supplant it with a more powerful one.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To reinforce the message of &amp;ldquo;solidarity&amp;rdquo; with Hazare, Gadkari today floated a new outfit called the Yuva Vahini, which drew its cadres from the party&amp;rsquo;s youth wing.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The cadres not only replenished the crowd at Ramlila Maidan but also picketed the Prime Minister&amp;rsquo;s residence.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The sources, however, conceded that they had fewer differences with the government&amp;rsquo;s version than with the Jan Lokpal bill. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 9661,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;BJP roots for Jan Lokpal in U-turn by Radhika Ramaseshan&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The BJP today rooted for Anna Hazare&amp;rsquo;s version of the Lokpal bill, two days after it distanced itself from the draft, the somersault coming in a letter the party&amp;rsquo;s president wrote to the fasting activist.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;We have always been and are for a strong Lokpal,&amp;rdquo; Nitin Gadkari said in his letter. &amp;ldquo;For that to happen, (the) BJP accepts your Jan Lokpal bill to be the basis for a strong and effective Lokpal to be put in place at the earliest without getting into procedural wrangles.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The letter was written and despatched this evening by Gadkari&amp;rsquo;s colleagues Jagat Nadda and Vinay Sahasthrabuddhe hours after Hazare associate Arvind Kejriwal had publicly challenged the BJP to spell out its stand on the Jan Lokpal bill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A meeting of the BJP&amp;rsquo;s core committee that Gadkari chaired tonight placed its stamp of approval on his Jan Lokpal pitch. L.K. Advani, Sushma Swaraj and Arun Jaitley were among those who attended the meeting.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;Our demand is firstly the government should drop its Lokpal bill,&amp;rdquo; spokesperson Ravi Shankar Prasad said. &amp;ldquo;The bill that replaces it should reflect the general premises and sentiments of the Jan Lokpal bill.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bolstered by the BJP&amp;rsquo;s turnaround, Hazare&amp;rsquo;s associates Kejriwal, Prashant Bhushan and Kiran Bedi called on the BJP leaders late tonight at Advani&amp;rsquo;s residence. Sources said they expected to be reassured that the BJP would not veer from the stand it fashioned today when the Lokpal issue is debated in Parliament tomorrow.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The sources cited several reasons for Gadkari&amp;rsquo;s somersault. They said he was pressured by the RSS and a section of the BJP to take a more strident stand on Hazare&amp;rsquo;s fast after leaders like Yashwant Sinha and Shatrughan Sinha voiced concerns over the party yielding its political turf to &amp;ldquo;civil society&amp;rdquo; for &amp;ldquo;want of clarity&amp;rdquo; on the issue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Sangh and the BJP dissenters, the sources said, felt that the parliamentary strategists were going &amp;ldquo;soft&amp;rdquo; on the government. A national executive member, close to the RSS, said he was &amp;ldquo;unhappy&amp;rdquo; with Lok Sabha Opposition leader Sushma readily associating the BJP with the Prime Minister&amp;rsquo;s statement on the Hazare episode this morning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He wondered why the usually combative Sushma &amp;ldquo;allowed&amp;rdquo; Manmohan Singh to get away with his dare to the BJP to nail him on personal corruption.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;Nobody from our party suggested he was under a cloud. But as the UPA government&amp;rsquo;s watchman, he slept through the 2G, CWG and other big scams and this point was not made by Sushma,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is learnt that when Hazare brought up the BJP&amp;rsquo;s &amp;ldquo;fuzziness&amp;rdquo; with Gadkari&amp;rsquo;s colleagues, he was told that Sushma&amp;rsquo;s brief address at the all-party meeting Singh had convened yesterday was in sync with the party&amp;rsquo;s stand of supporting the Jan Lokpal bill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gadkari&amp;rsquo;s letter said Sushma had demanded that the government withdraw its Lokpal bill and supplant it with a more powerful one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To reinforce the message of &amp;ldquo;solidarity&amp;rdquo; with Hazare, Gadkari today floated a new outfit called the Yuva Vahini, which drew its cadres from the party&amp;rsquo;s youth wing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The cadres not only replenished the crowd at Ramlila Maidan but also picketed the Prime Minister&amp;rsquo;s residence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The sources, however, conceded that they had fewer differences with the government&amp;rsquo;s version than with the Jan Lokpal bill. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 26 August, 2011, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1110826/jsp/nation/story_14426851.jsp&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;bjp-roots-for-jan-lokpal-in-u-turn-by-radhika-ramaseshan-9770&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 9770,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 9661
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | BJP roots for Jan Lokpal in U-turn by Radhika Ramaseshan&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;lokpal bill&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;

The BJP today rooted for Anna Hazare&amp;rsquo;s version of the Lokpal bill, two days after it distanced itself from the draft, the somersault coming in a letter the party&amp;rsquo;s president wrote to the fasting activist.

&amp;ldquo;We have always been and are...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The BJP today rooted for Anna Hazare&amp;rsquo;s version of the Lokpal bill, two days after it distanced itself from the draft, the somersault coming in a letter the party&amp;rsquo;s president wrote to the fasting activist.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;We have always been and are for a strong Lokpal,&amp;rdquo; Nitin Gadkari said in his letter. &amp;ldquo;For that to happen, (the) BJP accepts your Jan Lokpal bill to be the basis for a strong and effective Lokpal to be put in place at the earliest without getting into procedural wrangles.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The letter was written and despatched this evening by Gadkari&amp;rsquo;s colleagues Jagat Nadda and Vinay Sahasthrabuddhe hours after Hazare associate Arvind Kejriwal had publicly challenged the BJP to spell out its stand on the Jan Lokpal bill.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A meeting of the BJP&amp;rsquo;s core committee that Gadkari chaired tonight placed its stamp of approval on his Jan Lokpal pitch. L.K. Advani, Sushma Swaraj and Arun Jaitley were among those who attended the meeting.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;Our demand is firstly the government should drop its Lokpal bill,&amp;rdquo; spokesperson Ravi Shankar Prasad said. &amp;ldquo;The bill that replaces it should reflect the general premises and sentiments of the Jan Lokpal bill.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Bolstered by the BJP&amp;rsquo;s turnaround, Hazare&amp;rsquo;s associates Kejriwal, Prashant Bhushan and Kiran Bedi called on the BJP leaders late tonight at Advani&amp;rsquo;s residence. Sources said they expected to be reassured that the BJP would not veer from the stand it fashioned today when the Lokpal issue is debated in Parliament tomorrow.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The sources cited several reasons for Gadkari&amp;rsquo;s somersault. They said he was pressured by the RSS and a section of the BJP to take a more strident stand on Hazare&amp;rsquo;s fast after leaders like Yashwant Sinha and Shatrughan Sinha voiced concerns over the party yielding its political turf to &amp;ldquo;civil society&amp;rdquo; for &amp;ldquo;want of clarity&amp;rdquo; on the issue.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Sangh and the BJP dissenters, the sources said, felt that the parliamentary strategists were going &amp;ldquo;soft&amp;rdquo; on the government. A national executive member, close to the RSS, said he was &amp;ldquo;unhappy&amp;rdquo; with Lok Sabha Opposition leader Sushma readily associating the BJP with the Prime Minister&amp;rsquo;s statement on the Hazare episode this morning.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He wondered why the usually combative Sushma &amp;ldquo;allowed&amp;rdquo; Manmohan Singh to get away with his dare to the BJP to nail him on personal corruption.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;Nobody from our party suggested he was under a cloud. But as the UPA government&amp;rsquo;s watchman, he slept through the 2G, CWG and other big scams and this point was not made by Sushma,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It is learnt that when Hazare brought up the BJP&amp;rsquo;s &amp;ldquo;fuzziness&amp;rdquo; with Gadkari&amp;rsquo;s colleagues, he was told that Sushma&amp;rsquo;s brief address at the all-party meeting Singh had convened yesterday was in sync with the party&amp;rsquo;s stand of supporting the Jan Lokpal bill.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Gadkari&amp;rsquo;s letter said Sushma had demanded that the government withdraw its Lokpal bill and supplant it with a more powerful one.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To reinforce the message of &amp;ldquo;solidarity&amp;rdquo; with Hazare, Gadkari today floated a new outfit called the Yuva Vahini, which drew its cadres from the party&amp;rsquo;s youth wing.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The cadres not only replenished the crowd at Ramlila Maidan but also picketed the Prime Minister&amp;rsquo;s residence.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The sources, however, conceded that they had fewer differences with the government&amp;rsquo;s version than with the Jan Lokpal bill. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/bjp-roots-for-jan-lokpal-in-u-turn-by-radhika-ramaseshan-9770.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | BJP roots for Jan Lokpal in U-turn by Radhika Ramaseshan | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="

The BJP today rooted for Anna Hazare&rsquo;s version of the Lokpal bill, two days after it distanced itself from the draft, the somersault coming in a letter the party&rsquo;s president wrote to the fasting activist.

&ldquo;We have always been and are..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>BJP roots for Jan Lokpal in U-turn by Radhika Ramaseshan</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <br /><div align="justify">The BJP today rooted for Anna Hazare&rsquo;s version of the Lokpal bill, two days after it distanced itself from the draft, the somersault coming in a letter the party&rsquo;s president wrote to the fasting activist.<br /><br />&ldquo;We have always been and are for a strong Lokpal,&rdquo; Nitin Gadkari said in his letter. &ldquo;For that to happen, (the) BJP accepts your Jan Lokpal bill to be the basis for a strong and effective Lokpal to be put in place at the earliest without getting into procedural wrangles.&rdquo;<br /><br />The letter was written and despatched this evening by Gadkari&rsquo;s colleagues Jagat Nadda and Vinay Sahasthrabuddhe hours after Hazare associate Arvind Kejriwal had publicly challenged the BJP to spell out its stand on the Jan Lokpal bill.<br /><br />A meeting of the BJP&rsquo;s core committee that Gadkari chaired tonight placed its stamp of approval on his Jan Lokpal pitch. L.K. Advani, Sushma Swaraj and Arun Jaitley were among those who attended the meeting.<br /><br />&ldquo;Our demand is firstly the government should drop its Lokpal bill,&rdquo; spokesperson Ravi Shankar Prasad said. &ldquo;The bill that replaces it should reflect the general premises and sentiments of the Jan Lokpal bill.&rdquo;<br /><br />Bolstered by the BJP&rsquo;s turnaround, Hazare&rsquo;s associates Kejriwal, Prashant Bhushan and Kiran Bedi called on the BJP leaders late tonight at Advani&rsquo;s residence. Sources said they expected to be reassured that the BJP would not veer from the stand it fashioned today when the Lokpal issue is debated in Parliament tomorrow.<br /><br />The sources cited several reasons for Gadkari&rsquo;s somersault. They said he was pressured by the RSS and a section of the BJP to take a more strident stand on Hazare&rsquo;s fast after leaders like Yashwant Sinha and Shatrughan Sinha voiced concerns over the party yielding its political turf to &ldquo;civil society&rdquo; for &ldquo;want of clarity&rdquo; on the issue.<br /><br />The Sangh and the BJP dissenters, the sources said, felt that the parliamentary strategists were going &ldquo;soft&rdquo; on the government. A national executive member, close to the RSS, said he was &ldquo;unhappy&rdquo; with Lok Sabha Opposition leader Sushma readily associating the BJP with the Prime Minister&rsquo;s statement on the Hazare episode this morning.<br /><br />He wondered why the usually combative Sushma &ldquo;allowed&rdquo; Manmohan Singh to get away with his dare to the BJP to nail him on personal corruption.<br /><br />&ldquo;Nobody from our party suggested he was under a cloud. But as the UPA government&rsquo;s watchman, he slept through the 2G, CWG and other big scams and this point was not made by Sushma,&rdquo; he said.<br /><br />It is learnt that when Hazare brought up the BJP&rsquo;s &ldquo;fuzziness&rdquo; with Gadkari&rsquo;s colleagues, he was told that Sushma&rsquo;s brief address at the all-party meeting Singh had convened yesterday was in sync with the party&rsquo;s stand of supporting the Jan Lokpal bill.<br /><br />Gadkari&rsquo;s letter said Sushma had demanded that the government withdraw its Lokpal bill and supplant it with a more powerful one.<br /><br />To reinforce the message of &ldquo;solidarity&rdquo; with Hazare, Gadkari today floated a new outfit called the Yuva Vahini, which drew its cadres from the party&rsquo;s youth wing.<br /><br />The cadres not only replenished the crowd at Ramlila Maidan but also picketed the Prime Minister&rsquo;s residence.<br /><br />The sources, however, conceded that they had fewer differences with the government&rsquo;s version than with the Jan Lokpal bill. <br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68074a2873c87-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68074a2873c87-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68074a2873c87-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68074a2873c87-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68074a2873c87-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68074a2873c87-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68074a2873c87-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68074a2873c87-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68074a2873c87-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 9661,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;BJP roots for Jan Lokpal in U-turn by Radhika Ramaseshan&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The BJP today rooted for Anna Hazare&amp;rsquo;s version of the Lokpal bill, two days after it distanced itself from the draft, the somersault coming in a letter the party&amp;rsquo;s president wrote to the fasting activist.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;We have always been and are for a strong Lokpal,&amp;rdquo; Nitin Gadkari said in his letter. &amp;ldquo;For that to happen, (the) BJP accepts your Jan Lokpal bill to be the basis for a strong and effective Lokpal to be put in place at the earliest without getting into procedural wrangles.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The letter was written and despatched this evening by Gadkari&amp;rsquo;s colleagues Jagat Nadda and Vinay Sahasthrabuddhe hours after Hazare associate Arvind Kejriwal had publicly challenged the BJP to spell out its stand on the Jan Lokpal bill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A meeting of the BJP&amp;rsquo;s core committee that Gadkari chaired tonight placed its stamp of approval on his Jan Lokpal pitch. L.K. Advani, Sushma Swaraj and Arun Jaitley were among those who attended the meeting.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;Our demand is firstly the government should drop its Lokpal bill,&amp;rdquo; spokesperson Ravi Shankar Prasad said. &amp;ldquo;The bill that replaces it should reflect the general premises and sentiments of the Jan Lokpal bill.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bolstered by the BJP&amp;rsquo;s turnaround, Hazare&amp;rsquo;s associates Kejriwal, Prashant Bhushan and Kiran Bedi called on the BJP leaders late tonight at Advani&amp;rsquo;s residence. Sources said they expected to be reassured that the BJP would not veer from the stand it fashioned today when the Lokpal issue is debated in Parliament tomorrow.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The sources cited several reasons for Gadkari&amp;rsquo;s somersault. They said he was pressured by the RSS and a section of the BJP to take a more strident stand on Hazare&amp;rsquo;s fast after leaders like Yashwant Sinha and Shatrughan Sinha voiced concerns over the party yielding its political turf to &amp;ldquo;civil society&amp;rdquo; for &amp;ldquo;want of clarity&amp;rdquo; on the issue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Sangh and the BJP dissenters, the sources said, felt that the parliamentary strategists were going &amp;ldquo;soft&amp;rdquo; on the government. A national executive member, close to the RSS, said he was &amp;ldquo;unhappy&amp;rdquo; with Lok Sabha Opposition leader Sushma readily associating the BJP with the Prime Minister&amp;rsquo;s statement on the Hazare episode this morning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He wondered why the usually combative Sushma &amp;ldquo;allowed&amp;rdquo; Manmohan Singh to get away with his dare to the BJP to nail him on personal corruption.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;Nobody from our party suggested he was under a cloud. But as the UPA government&amp;rsquo;s watchman, he slept through the 2G, CWG and other big scams and this point was not made by Sushma,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is learnt that when Hazare brought up the BJP&amp;rsquo;s &amp;ldquo;fuzziness&amp;rdquo; with Gadkari&amp;rsquo;s colleagues, he was told that Sushma&amp;rsquo;s brief address at the all-party meeting Singh had convened yesterday was in sync with the party&amp;rsquo;s stand of supporting the Jan Lokpal bill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gadkari&amp;rsquo;s letter said Sushma had demanded that the government withdraw its Lokpal bill and supplant it with a more powerful one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To reinforce the message of &amp;ldquo;solidarity&amp;rdquo; with Hazare, Gadkari today floated a new outfit called the Yuva Vahini, which drew its cadres from the party&amp;rsquo;s youth wing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The cadres not only replenished the crowd at Ramlila Maidan but also picketed the Prime Minister&amp;rsquo;s residence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The sources, however, conceded that they had fewer differences with the government&amp;rsquo;s version than with the Jan Lokpal bill. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 26 August, 2011, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1110826/jsp/nation/story_14426851.jsp&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;bjp-roots-for-jan-lokpal-in-u-turn-by-radhika-ramaseshan-9770&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 9770,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 9661,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | BJP roots for Jan Lokpal in U-turn by Radhika Ramaseshan&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;lokpal bill&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;

The BJP today rooted for Anna Hazare&amp;rsquo;s version of the Lokpal bill, two days after it distanced itself from the draft, the somersault coming in a letter the party&amp;rsquo;s president wrote to the fasting activist.

&amp;ldquo;We have always been and are...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The BJP today rooted for Anna Hazare&amp;rsquo;s version of the Lokpal bill, two days after it distanced itself from the draft, the somersault coming in a letter the party&amp;rsquo;s president wrote to the fasting activist.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;We have always been and are for a strong Lokpal,&amp;rdquo; Nitin Gadkari said in his letter. &amp;ldquo;For that to happen, (the) BJP accepts your Jan Lokpal bill to be the basis for a strong and effective Lokpal to be put in place at the earliest without getting into procedural wrangles.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The letter was written and despatched this evening by Gadkari&amp;rsquo;s colleagues Jagat Nadda and Vinay Sahasthrabuddhe hours after Hazare associate Arvind Kejriwal had publicly challenged the BJP to spell out its stand on the Jan Lokpal bill.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A meeting of the BJP&amp;rsquo;s core committee that Gadkari chaired tonight placed its stamp of approval on his Jan Lokpal pitch. L.K. Advani, Sushma Swaraj and Arun Jaitley were among those who attended the meeting.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;Our demand is firstly the government should drop its Lokpal bill,&amp;rdquo; spokesperson Ravi Shankar Prasad said. &amp;ldquo;The bill that replaces it should reflect the general premises and sentiments of the Jan Lokpal bill.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Bolstered by the BJP&amp;rsquo;s turnaround, Hazare&amp;rsquo;s associates Kejriwal, Prashant Bhushan and Kiran Bedi called on the BJP leaders late tonight at Advani&amp;rsquo;s residence. Sources said they expected to be reassured that the BJP would not veer from the stand it fashioned today when the Lokpal issue is debated in Parliament tomorrow.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The sources cited several reasons for Gadkari&amp;rsquo;s somersault. They said he was pressured by the RSS and a section of the BJP to take a more strident stand on Hazare&amp;rsquo;s fast after leaders like Yashwant Sinha and Shatrughan Sinha voiced concerns over the party yielding its political turf to &amp;ldquo;civil society&amp;rdquo; for &amp;ldquo;want of clarity&amp;rdquo; on the issue.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Sangh and the BJP dissenters, the sources said, felt that the parliamentary strategists were going &amp;ldquo;soft&amp;rdquo; on the government. A national executive member, close to the RSS, said he was &amp;ldquo;unhappy&amp;rdquo; with Lok Sabha Opposition leader Sushma readily associating the BJP with the Prime Minister&amp;rsquo;s statement on the Hazare episode this morning.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He wondered why the usually combative Sushma &amp;ldquo;allowed&amp;rdquo; Manmohan Singh to get away with his dare to the BJP to nail him on personal corruption.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;Nobody from our party suggested he was under a cloud. But as the UPA government&amp;rsquo;s watchman, he slept through the 2G, CWG and other big scams and this point was not made by Sushma,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It is learnt that when Hazare brought up the BJP&amp;rsquo;s &amp;ldquo;fuzziness&amp;rdquo; with Gadkari&amp;rsquo;s colleagues, he was told that Sushma&amp;rsquo;s brief address at the all-party meeting Singh had convened yesterday was in sync with the party&amp;rsquo;s stand of supporting the Jan Lokpal bill.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Gadkari&amp;rsquo;s letter said Sushma had demanded that the government withdraw its Lokpal bill and supplant it with a more powerful one.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To reinforce the message of &amp;ldquo;solidarity&amp;rdquo; with Hazare, Gadkari today floated a new outfit called the Yuva Vahini, which drew its cadres from the party&amp;rsquo;s youth wing.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The cadres not only replenished the crowd at Ramlila Maidan but also picketed the Prime Minister&amp;rsquo;s residence.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The sources, however, conceded that they had fewer differences with the government&amp;rsquo;s version than with the Jan Lokpal bill. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 9661,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;BJP roots for Jan Lokpal in U-turn by Radhika Ramaseshan&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The BJP today rooted for Anna Hazare&amp;rsquo;s version of the Lokpal bill, two days after it distanced itself from the draft, the somersault coming in a letter the party&amp;rsquo;s president wrote to the fasting activist.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;We have always been and are for a strong Lokpal,&amp;rdquo; Nitin Gadkari said in his letter. &amp;ldquo;For that to happen, (the) BJP accepts your Jan Lokpal bill to be the basis for a strong and effective Lokpal to be put in place at the earliest without getting into procedural wrangles.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The letter was written and despatched this evening by Gadkari&amp;rsquo;s colleagues Jagat Nadda and Vinay Sahasthrabuddhe hours after Hazare associate Arvind Kejriwal had publicly challenged the BJP to spell out its stand on the Jan Lokpal bill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A meeting of the BJP&amp;rsquo;s core committee that Gadkari chaired tonight placed its stamp of approval on his Jan Lokpal pitch. L.K. Advani, Sushma Swaraj and Arun Jaitley were among those who attended the meeting.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;Our demand is firstly the government should drop its Lokpal bill,&amp;rdquo; spokesperson Ravi Shankar Prasad said. &amp;ldquo;The bill that replaces it should reflect the general premises and sentiments of the Jan Lokpal bill.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bolstered by the BJP&amp;rsquo;s turnaround, Hazare&amp;rsquo;s associates Kejriwal, Prashant Bhushan and Kiran Bedi called on the BJP leaders late tonight at Advani&amp;rsquo;s residence. Sources said they expected to be reassured that the BJP would not veer from the stand it fashioned today when the Lokpal issue is debated in Parliament tomorrow.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The sources cited several reasons for Gadkari&amp;rsquo;s somersault. They said he was pressured by the RSS and a section of the BJP to take a more strident stand on Hazare&amp;rsquo;s fast after leaders like Yashwant Sinha and Shatrughan Sinha voiced concerns over the party yielding its political turf to &amp;ldquo;civil society&amp;rdquo; for &amp;ldquo;want of clarity&amp;rdquo; on the issue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Sangh and the BJP dissenters, the sources said, felt that the parliamentary strategists were going &amp;ldquo;soft&amp;rdquo; on the government. A national executive member, close to the RSS, said he was &amp;ldquo;unhappy&amp;rdquo; with Lok Sabha Opposition leader Sushma readily associating the BJP with the Prime Minister&amp;rsquo;s statement on the Hazare episode this morning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He wondered why the usually combative Sushma &amp;ldquo;allowed&amp;rdquo; Manmohan Singh to get away with his dare to the BJP to nail him on personal corruption.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;Nobody from our party suggested he was under a cloud. But as the UPA government&amp;rsquo;s watchman, he slept through the 2G, CWG and other big scams and this point was not made by Sushma,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is learnt that when Hazare brought up the BJP&amp;rsquo;s &amp;ldquo;fuzziness&amp;rdquo; with Gadkari&amp;rsquo;s colleagues, he was told that Sushma&amp;rsquo;s brief address at the all-party meeting Singh had convened yesterday was in sync with the party&amp;rsquo;s stand of supporting the Jan Lokpal bill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gadkari&amp;rsquo;s letter said Sushma had demanded that the government withdraw its Lokpal bill and supplant it with a more powerful one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To reinforce the message of &amp;ldquo;solidarity&amp;rdquo; with Hazare, Gadkari today floated a new outfit called the Yuva Vahini, which drew its cadres from the party&amp;rsquo;s youth wing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The cadres not only replenished the crowd at Ramlila Maidan but also picketed the Prime Minister&amp;rsquo;s residence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The sources, however, conceded that they had fewer differences with the government&amp;rsquo;s version than with the Jan Lokpal bill. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 26 August, 2011, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1110826/jsp/nation/story_14426851.jsp&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;bjp-roots-for-jan-lokpal-in-u-turn-by-radhika-ramaseshan-9770&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 9770,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 9661
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | BJP roots for Jan Lokpal in U-turn by Radhika Ramaseshan&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;lokpal bill&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;

The BJP today rooted for Anna Hazare&amp;rsquo;s version of the Lokpal bill, two days after it distanced itself from the draft, the somersault coming in a letter the party&amp;rsquo;s president wrote to the fasting activist.

&amp;ldquo;We have always been and are...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The BJP today rooted for Anna Hazare&amp;rsquo;s version of the Lokpal bill, two days after it distanced itself from the draft, the somersault coming in a letter the party&amp;rsquo;s president wrote to the fasting activist.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;We have always been and are for a strong Lokpal,&amp;rdquo; Nitin Gadkari said in his letter. &amp;ldquo;For that to happen, (the) BJP accepts your Jan Lokpal bill to be the basis for a strong and effective Lokpal to be put in place at the earliest without getting into procedural wrangles.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The letter was written and despatched this evening by Gadkari&amp;rsquo;s colleagues Jagat Nadda and Vinay Sahasthrabuddhe hours after Hazare associate Arvind Kejriwal had publicly challenged the BJP to spell out its stand on the Jan Lokpal bill.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A meeting of the BJP&amp;rsquo;s core committee that Gadkari chaired tonight placed its stamp of approval on his Jan Lokpal pitch. L.K. Advani, Sushma Swaraj and Arun Jaitley were among those who attended the meeting.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;Our demand is firstly the government should drop its Lokpal bill,&amp;rdquo; spokesperson Ravi Shankar Prasad said. &amp;ldquo;The bill that replaces it should reflect the general premises and sentiments of the Jan Lokpal bill.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Bolstered by the BJP&amp;rsquo;s turnaround, Hazare&amp;rsquo;s associates Kejriwal, Prashant Bhushan and Kiran Bedi called on the BJP leaders late tonight at Advani&amp;rsquo;s residence. Sources said they expected to be reassured that the BJP would not veer from the stand it fashioned today when the Lokpal issue is debated in Parliament tomorrow.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The sources cited several reasons for Gadkari&amp;rsquo;s somersault. They said he was pressured by the RSS and a section of the BJP to take a more strident stand on Hazare&amp;rsquo;s fast after leaders like Yashwant Sinha and Shatrughan Sinha voiced concerns over the party yielding its political turf to &amp;ldquo;civil society&amp;rdquo; for &amp;ldquo;want of clarity&amp;rdquo; on the issue.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Sangh and the BJP dissenters, the sources said, felt that the parliamentary strategists were going &amp;ldquo;soft&amp;rdquo; on the government. A national executive member, close to the RSS, said he was &amp;ldquo;unhappy&amp;rdquo; with Lok Sabha Opposition leader Sushma readily associating the BJP with the Prime Minister&amp;rsquo;s statement on the Hazare episode this morning.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He wondered why the usually combative Sushma &amp;ldquo;allowed&amp;rdquo; Manmohan Singh to get away with his dare to the BJP to nail him on personal corruption.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;Nobody from our party suggested he was under a cloud. But as the UPA government&amp;rsquo;s watchman, he slept through the 2G, CWG and other big scams and this point was not made by Sushma,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It is learnt that when Hazare brought up the BJP&amp;rsquo;s &amp;ldquo;fuzziness&amp;rdquo; with Gadkari&amp;rsquo;s colleagues, he was told that Sushma&amp;rsquo;s brief address at the all-party meeting Singh had convened yesterday was in sync with the party&amp;rsquo;s stand of supporting the Jan Lokpal bill.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Gadkari&amp;rsquo;s letter said Sushma had demanded that the government withdraw its Lokpal bill and supplant it with a more powerful one.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To reinforce the message of &amp;ldquo;solidarity&amp;rdquo; with Hazare, Gadkari today floated a new outfit called the Yuva Vahini, which drew its cadres from the party&amp;rsquo;s youth wing.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The cadres not only replenished the crowd at Ramlila Maidan but also picketed the Prime Minister&amp;rsquo;s residence.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The sources, however, conceded that they had fewer differences with the government&amp;rsquo;s version than with the Jan Lokpal bill. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/bjp-roots-for-jan-lokpal-in-u-turn-by-radhika-ramaseshan-9770.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | BJP roots for Jan Lokpal in U-turn by Radhika Ramaseshan | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="

The BJP today rooted for Anna Hazare&rsquo;s version of the Lokpal bill, two days after it distanced itself from the draft, the somersault coming in a letter the party&rsquo;s president wrote to the fasting activist.

&ldquo;We have always been and are..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>BJP roots for Jan Lokpal in U-turn by Radhika Ramaseshan</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <br /><div align="justify">The BJP today rooted for Anna Hazare&rsquo;s version of the Lokpal bill, two days after it distanced itself from the draft, the somersault coming in a letter the party&rsquo;s president wrote to the fasting activist.<br /><br />&ldquo;We have always been and are for a strong Lokpal,&rdquo; Nitin Gadkari said in his letter. &ldquo;For that to happen, (the) BJP accepts your Jan Lokpal bill to be the basis for a strong and effective Lokpal to be put in place at the earliest without getting into procedural wrangles.&rdquo;<br /><br />The letter was written and despatched this evening by Gadkari&rsquo;s colleagues Jagat Nadda and Vinay Sahasthrabuddhe hours after Hazare associate Arvind Kejriwal had publicly challenged the BJP to spell out its stand on the Jan Lokpal bill.<br /><br />A meeting of the BJP&rsquo;s core committee that Gadkari chaired tonight placed its stamp of approval on his Jan Lokpal pitch. L.K. Advani, Sushma Swaraj and Arun Jaitley were among those who attended the meeting.<br /><br />&ldquo;Our demand is firstly the government should drop its Lokpal bill,&rdquo; spokesperson Ravi Shankar Prasad said. &ldquo;The bill that replaces it should reflect the general premises and sentiments of the Jan Lokpal bill.&rdquo;<br /><br />Bolstered by the BJP&rsquo;s turnaround, Hazare&rsquo;s associates Kejriwal, Prashant Bhushan and Kiran Bedi called on the BJP leaders late tonight at Advani&rsquo;s residence. Sources said they expected to be reassured that the BJP would not veer from the stand it fashioned today when the Lokpal issue is debated in Parliament tomorrow.<br /><br />The sources cited several reasons for Gadkari&rsquo;s somersault. They said he was pressured by the RSS and a section of the BJP to take a more strident stand on Hazare&rsquo;s fast after leaders like Yashwant Sinha and Shatrughan Sinha voiced concerns over the party yielding its political turf to &ldquo;civil society&rdquo; for &ldquo;want of clarity&rdquo; on the issue.<br /><br />The Sangh and the BJP dissenters, the sources said, felt that the parliamentary strategists were going &ldquo;soft&rdquo; on the government. A national executive member, close to the RSS, said he was &ldquo;unhappy&rdquo; with Lok Sabha Opposition leader Sushma readily associating the BJP with the Prime Minister&rsquo;s statement on the Hazare episode this morning.<br /><br />He wondered why the usually combative Sushma &ldquo;allowed&rdquo; Manmohan Singh to get away with his dare to the BJP to nail him on personal corruption.<br /><br />&ldquo;Nobody from our party suggested he was under a cloud. But as the UPA government&rsquo;s watchman, he slept through the 2G, CWG and other big scams and this point was not made by Sushma,&rdquo; he said.<br /><br />It is learnt that when Hazare brought up the BJP&rsquo;s &ldquo;fuzziness&rdquo; with Gadkari&rsquo;s colleagues, he was told that Sushma&rsquo;s brief address at the all-party meeting Singh had convened yesterday was in sync with the party&rsquo;s stand of supporting the Jan Lokpal bill.<br /><br />Gadkari&rsquo;s letter said Sushma had demanded that the government withdraw its Lokpal bill and supplant it with a more powerful one.<br /><br />To reinforce the message of &ldquo;solidarity&rdquo; with Hazare, Gadkari today floated a new outfit called the Yuva Vahini, which drew its cadres from the party&rsquo;s youth wing.<br /><br />The cadres not only replenished the crowd at Ramlila Maidan but also picketed the Prime Minister&rsquo;s residence.<br /><br />The sources, however, conceded that they had fewer differences with the government&rsquo;s version than with the Jan Lokpal bill. <br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68074a2873c87-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68074a2873c87-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68074a2873c87-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68074a2873c87-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68074a2873c87-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68074a2873c87-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68074a2873c87-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68074a2873c87-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68074a2873c87-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 9661,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;BJP roots for Jan Lokpal in U-turn by Radhika Ramaseshan&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The BJP today rooted for Anna Hazare&amp;rsquo;s version of the Lokpal bill, two days after it distanced itself from the draft, the somersault coming in a letter the party&amp;rsquo;s president wrote to the fasting activist.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;We have always been and are for a strong Lokpal,&amp;rdquo; Nitin Gadkari said in his letter. &amp;ldquo;For that to happen, (the) BJP accepts your Jan Lokpal bill to be the basis for a strong and effective Lokpal to be put in place at the earliest without getting into procedural wrangles.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The letter was written and despatched this evening by Gadkari&amp;rsquo;s colleagues Jagat Nadda and Vinay Sahasthrabuddhe hours after Hazare associate Arvind Kejriwal had publicly challenged the BJP to spell out its stand on the Jan Lokpal bill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A meeting of the BJP&amp;rsquo;s core committee that Gadkari chaired tonight placed its stamp of approval on his Jan Lokpal pitch. L.K. Advani, Sushma Swaraj and Arun Jaitley were among those who attended the meeting.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;Our demand is firstly the government should drop its Lokpal bill,&amp;rdquo; spokesperson Ravi Shankar Prasad said. &amp;ldquo;The bill that replaces it should reflect the general premises and sentiments of the Jan Lokpal bill.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bolstered by the BJP&amp;rsquo;s turnaround, Hazare&amp;rsquo;s associates Kejriwal, Prashant Bhushan and Kiran Bedi called on the BJP leaders late tonight at Advani&amp;rsquo;s residence. Sources said they expected to be reassured that the BJP would not veer from the stand it fashioned today when the Lokpal issue is debated in Parliament tomorrow.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The sources cited several reasons for Gadkari&amp;rsquo;s somersault. They said he was pressured by the RSS and a section of the BJP to take a more strident stand on Hazare&amp;rsquo;s fast after leaders like Yashwant Sinha and Shatrughan Sinha voiced concerns over the party yielding its political turf to &amp;ldquo;civil society&amp;rdquo; for &amp;ldquo;want of clarity&amp;rdquo; on the issue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Sangh and the BJP dissenters, the sources said, felt that the parliamentary strategists were going &amp;ldquo;soft&amp;rdquo; on the government. A national executive member, close to the RSS, said he was &amp;ldquo;unhappy&amp;rdquo; with Lok Sabha Opposition leader Sushma readily associating the BJP with the Prime Minister&amp;rsquo;s statement on the Hazare episode this morning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He wondered why the usually combative Sushma &amp;ldquo;allowed&amp;rdquo; Manmohan Singh to get away with his dare to the BJP to nail him on personal corruption.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;Nobody from our party suggested he was under a cloud. But as the UPA government&amp;rsquo;s watchman, he slept through the 2G, CWG and other big scams and this point was not made by Sushma,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is learnt that when Hazare brought up the BJP&amp;rsquo;s &amp;ldquo;fuzziness&amp;rdquo; with Gadkari&amp;rsquo;s colleagues, he was told that Sushma&amp;rsquo;s brief address at the all-party meeting Singh had convened yesterday was in sync with the party&amp;rsquo;s stand of supporting the Jan Lokpal bill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gadkari&amp;rsquo;s letter said Sushma had demanded that the government withdraw its Lokpal bill and supplant it with a more powerful one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To reinforce the message of &amp;ldquo;solidarity&amp;rdquo; with Hazare, Gadkari today floated a new outfit called the Yuva Vahini, which drew its cadres from the party&amp;rsquo;s youth wing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The cadres not only replenished the crowd at Ramlila Maidan but also picketed the Prime Minister&amp;rsquo;s residence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The sources, however, conceded that they had fewer differences with the government&amp;rsquo;s version than with the Jan Lokpal bill. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 26 August, 2011, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1110826/jsp/nation/story_14426851.jsp&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;bjp-roots-for-jan-lokpal-in-u-turn-by-radhika-ramaseshan-9770&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 9770,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 9661,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | BJP roots for Jan Lokpal in U-turn by Radhika Ramaseshan&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;lokpal bill&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;

The BJP today rooted for Anna Hazare&amp;rsquo;s version of the Lokpal bill, two days after it distanced itself from the draft, the somersault coming in a letter the party&amp;rsquo;s president wrote to the fasting activist.

&amp;ldquo;We have always been and are...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The BJP today rooted for Anna Hazare&amp;rsquo;s version of the Lokpal bill, two days after it distanced itself from the draft, the somersault coming in a letter the party&amp;rsquo;s president wrote to the fasting activist.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;We have always been and are for a strong Lokpal,&amp;rdquo; Nitin Gadkari said in his letter. &amp;ldquo;For that to happen, (the) BJP accepts your Jan Lokpal bill to be the basis for a strong and effective Lokpal to be put in place at the earliest without getting into procedural wrangles.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The letter was written and despatched this evening by Gadkari&amp;rsquo;s colleagues Jagat Nadda and Vinay Sahasthrabuddhe hours after Hazare associate Arvind Kejriwal had publicly challenged the BJP to spell out its stand on the Jan Lokpal bill.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A meeting of the BJP&amp;rsquo;s core committee that Gadkari chaired tonight placed its stamp of approval on his Jan Lokpal pitch. L.K. Advani, Sushma Swaraj and Arun Jaitley were among those who attended the meeting.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;Our demand is firstly the government should drop its Lokpal bill,&amp;rdquo; spokesperson Ravi Shankar Prasad said. &amp;ldquo;The bill that replaces it should reflect the general premises and sentiments of the Jan Lokpal bill.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Bolstered by the BJP&amp;rsquo;s turnaround, Hazare&amp;rsquo;s associates Kejriwal, Prashant Bhushan and Kiran Bedi called on the BJP leaders late tonight at Advani&amp;rsquo;s residence. Sources said they expected to be reassured that the BJP would not veer from the stand it fashioned today when the Lokpal issue is debated in Parliament tomorrow.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The sources cited several reasons for Gadkari&amp;rsquo;s somersault. They said he was pressured by the RSS and a section of the BJP to take a more strident stand on Hazare&amp;rsquo;s fast after leaders like Yashwant Sinha and Shatrughan Sinha voiced concerns over the party yielding its political turf to &amp;ldquo;civil society&amp;rdquo; for &amp;ldquo;want of clarity&amp;rdquo; on the issue.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Sangh and the BJP dissenters, the sources said, felt that the parliamentary strategists were going &amp;ldquo;soft&amp;rdquo; on the government. A national executive member, close to the RSS, said he was &amp;ldquo;unhappy&amp;rdquo; with Lok Sabha Opposition leader Sushma readily associating the BJP with the Prime Minister&amp;rsquo;s statement on the Hazare episode this morning.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He wondered why the usually combative Sushma &amp;ldquo;allowed&amp;rdquo; Manmohan Singh to get away with his dare to the BJP to nail him on personal corruption.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;Nobody from our party suggested he was under a cloud. But as the UPA government&amp;rsquo;s watchman, he slept through the 2G, CWG and other big scams and this point was not made by Sushma,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It is learnt that when Hazare brought up the BJP&amp;rsquo;s &amp;ldquo;fuzziness&amp;rdquo; with Gadkari&amp;rsquo;s colleagues, he was told that Sushma&amp;rsquo;s brief address at the all-party meeting Singh had convened yesterday was in sync with the party&amp;rsquo;s stand of supporting the Jan Lokpal bill.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Gadkari&amp;rsquo;s letter said Sushma had demanded that the government withdraw its Lokpal bill and supplant it with a more powerful one.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To reinforce the message of &amp;ldquo;solidarity&amp;rdquo; with Hazare, Gadkari today floated a new outfit called the Yuva Vahini, which drew its cadres from the party&amp;rsquo;s youth wing.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The cadres not only replenished the crowd at Ramlila Maidan but also picketed the Prime Minister&amp;rsquo;s residence.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The sources, however, conceded that they had fewer differences with the government&amp;rsquo;s version than with the Jan Lokpal bill. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 9661,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;BJP roots for Jan Lokpal in U-turn by Radhika Ramaseshan&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
The BJP today rooted for Anna Hazare&amp;rsquo;s version of the Lokpal bill, two days after it distanced itself from the draft, the somersault coming in a letter the party&amp;rsquo;s president wrote to the fasting activist.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;We have always been and are for a strong Lokpal,&amp;rdquo; Nitin Gadkari said in his letter. &amp;ldquo;For that to happen, (the) BJP accepts your Jan Lokpal bill to be the basis for a strong and effective Lokpal to be put in place at the earliest without getting into procedural wrangles.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The letter was written and despatched this evening by Gadkari&amp;rsquo;s colleagues Jagat Nadda and Vinay Sahasthrabuddhe hours after Hazare associate Arvind Kejriwal had publicly challenged the BJP to spell out its stand on the Jan Lokpal bill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A meeting of the BJP&amp;rsquo;s core committee that Gadkari chaired tonight placed its stamp of approval on his Jan Lokpal pitch. L.K. Advani, Sushma Swaraj and Arun Jaitley were among those who attended the meeting.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;Our demand is firstly the government should drop its Lokpal bill,&amp;rdquo; spokesperson Ravi Shankar Prasad said. &amp;ldquo;The bill that replaces it should reflect the general premises and sentiments of the Jan Lokpal bill.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bolstered by the BJP&amp;rsquo;s turnaround, Hazare&amp;rsquo;s associates Kejriwal, Prashant Bhushan and Kiran Bedi called on the BJP leaders late tonight at Advani&amp;rsquo;s residence. Sources said they expected to be reassured that the BJP would not veer from the stand it fashioned today when the Lokpal issue is debated in Parliament tomorrow.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The sources cited several reasons for Gadkari&amp;rsquo;s somersault. They said he was pressured by the RSS and a section of the BJP to take a more strident stand on Hazare&amp;rsquo;s fast after leaders like Yashwant Sinha and Shatrughan Sinha voiced concerns over the party yielding its political turf to &amp;ldquo;civil society&amp;rdquo; for &amp;ldquo;want of clarity&amp;rdquo; on the issue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Sangh and the BJP dissenters, the sources said, felt that the parliamentary strategists were going &amp;ldquo;soft&amp;rdquo; on the government. A national executive member, close to the RSS, said he was &amp;ldquo;unhappy&amp;rdquo; with Lok Sabha Opposition leader Sushma readily associating the BJP with the Prime Minister&amp;rsquo;s statement on the Hazare episode this morning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He wondered why the usually combative Sushma &amp;ldquo;allowed&amp;rdquo; Manmohan Singh to get away with his dare to the BJP to nail him on personal corruption.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;Nobody from our party suggested he was under a cloud. But as the UPA government&amp;rsquo;s watchman, he slept through the 2G, CWG and other big scams and this point was not made by Sushma,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is learnt that when Hazare brought up the BJP&amp;rsquo;s &amp;ldquo;fuzziness&amp;rdquo; with Gadkari&amp;rsquo;s colleagues, he was told that Sushma&amp;rsquo;s brief address at the all-party meeting Singh had convened yesterday was in sync with the party&amp;rsquo;s stand of supporting the Jan Lokpal bill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gadkari&amp;rsquo;s letter said Sushma had demanded that the government withdraw its Lokpal bill and supplant it with a more powerful one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To reinforce the message of &amp;ldquo;solidarity&amp;rdquo; with Hazare, Gadkari today floated a new outfit called the Yuva Vahini, which drew its cadres from the party&amp;rsquo;s youth wing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The cadres not only replenished the crowd at Ramlila Maidan but also picketed the Prime Minister&amp;rsquo;s residence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The sources, however, conceded that they had fewer differences with the government&amp;rsquo;s version than with the Jan Lokpal bill. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 26 August, 2011, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1110826/jsp/nation/story_14426851.jsp&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;bjp-roots-for-jan-lokpal-in-u-turn-by-radhika-ramaseshan-9770&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 9770,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 9661
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | BJP roots for Jan Lokpal in U-turn by Radhika Ramaseshan&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;lokpal bill&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;

The BJP today rooted for Anna Hazare&amp;rsquo;s version of the Lokpal bill, two days after it distanced itself from the draft, the somersault coming in a letter the party&amp;rsquo;s president wrote to the fasting activist.

&amp;ldquo;We have always been and are...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The BJP today rooted for Anna Hazare&amp;rsquo;s version of the Lokpal bill, two days after it distanced itself from the draft, the somersault coming in a letter the party&amp;rsquo;s president wrote to the fasting activist.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;We have always been and are for a strong Lokpal,&amp;rdquo; Nitin Gadkari said in his letter. &amp;ldquo;For that to happen, (the) BJP accepts your Jan Lokpal bill to be the basis for a strong and effective Lokpal to be put in place at the earliest without getting into procedural wrangles.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The letter was written and despatched this evening by Gadkari&amp;rsquo;s colleagues Jagat Nadda and Vinay Sahasthrabuddhe hours after Hazare associate Arvind Kejriwal had publicly challenged the BJP to spell out its stand on the Jan Lokpal bill.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A meeting of the BJP&amp;rsquo;s core committee that Gadkari chaired tonight placed its stamp of approval on his Jan Lokpal pitch. L.K. Advani, Sushma Swaraj and Arun Jaitley were among those who attended the meeting.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;Our demand is firstly the government should drop its Lokpal bill,&amp;rdquo; spokesperson Ravi Shankar Prasad said. &amp;ldquo;The bill that replaces it should reflect the general premises and sentiments of the Jan Lokpal bill.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Bolstered by the BJP&amp;rsquo;s turnaround, Hazare&amp;rsquo;s associates Kejriwal, Prashant Bhushan and Kiran Bedi called on the BJP leaders late tonight at Advani&amp;rsquo;s residence. Sources said they expected to be reassured that the BJP would not veer from the stand it fashioned today when the Lokpal issue is debated in Parliament tomorrow.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The sources cited several reasons for Gadkari&amp;rsquo;s somersault. They said he was pressured by the RSS and a section of the BJP to take a more strident stand on Hazare&amp;rsquo;s fast after leaders like Yashwant Sinha and Shatrughan Sinha voiced concerns over the party yielding its political turf to &amp;ldquo;civil society&amp;rdquo; for &amp;ldquo;want of clarity&amp;rdquo; on the issue.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Sangh and the BJP dissenters, the sources said, felt that the parliamentary strategists were going &amp;ldquo;soft&amp;rdquo; on the government. A national executive member, close to the RSS, said he was &amp;ldquo;unhappy&amp;rdquo; with Lok Sabha Opposition leader Sushma readily associating the BJP with the Prime Minister&amp;rsquo;s statement on the Hazare episode this morning.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He wondered why the usually combative Sushma &amp;ldquo;allowed&amp;rdquo; Manmohan Singh to get away with his dare to the BJP to nail him on personal corruption.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;Nobody from our party suggested he was under a cloud. But as the UPA government&amp;rsquo;s watchman, he slept through the 2G, CWG and other big scams and this point was not made by Sushma,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It is learnt that when Hazare brought up the BJP&amp;rsquo;s &amp;ldquo;fuzziness&amp;rdquo; with Gadkari&amp;rsquo;s colleagues, he was told that Sushma&amp;rsquo;s brief address at the all-party meeting Singh had convened yesterday was in sync with the party&amp;rsquo;s stand of supporting the Jan Lokpal bill.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Gadkari&amp;rsquo;s letter said Sushma had demanded that the government withdraw its Lokpal bill and supplant it with a more powerful one.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To reinforce the message of &amp;ldquo;solidarity&amp;rdquo; with Hazare, Gadkari today floated a new outfit called the Yuva Vahini, which drew its cadres from the party&amp;rsquo;s youth wing.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The cadres not only replenished the crowd at Ramlila Maidan but also picketed the Prime Minister&amp;rsquo;s residence.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The sources, however, conceded that they had fewer differences with the government&amp;rsquo;s version than with the Jan Lokpal bill. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/bjp-roots-for-jan-lokpal-in-u-turn-by-radhika-ramaseshan-9770.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | BJP roots for Jan Lokpal in U-turn by Radhika Ramaseshan | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="

The BJP today rooted for Anna Hazare&rsquo;s version of the Lokpal bill, two days after it distanced itself from the draft, the somersault coming in a letter the party&rsquo;s president wrote to the fasting activist.

&ldquo;We have always been and are..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>BJP roots for Jan Lokpal in U-turn by Radhika Ramaseshan</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <br /><div align="justify">The BJP today rooted for Anna Hazare&rsquo;s version of the Lokpal bill, two days after it distanced itself from the draft, the somersault coming in a letter the party&rsquo;s president wrote to the fasting activist.<br /><br />&ldquo;We have always been and are for a strong Lokpal,&rdquo; Nitin Gadkari said in his letter. &ldquo;For that to happen, (the) BJP accepts your Jan Lokpal bill to be the basis for a strong and effective Lokpal to be put in place at the earliest without getting into procedural wrangles.&rdquo;<br /><br />The letter was written and despatched this evening by Gadkari&rsquo;s colleagues Jagat Nadda and Vinay Sahasthrabuddhe hours after Hazare associate Arvind Kejriwal had publicly challenged the BJP to spell out its stand on the Jan Lokpal bill.<br /><br />A meeting of the BJP&rsquo;s core committee that Gadkari chaired tonight placed its stamp of approval on his Jan Lokpal pitch. L.K. Advani, Sushma Swaraj and Arun Jaitley were among those who attended the meeting.<br /><br />&ldquo;Our demand is firstly the government should drop its Lokpal bill,&rdquo; spokesperson Ravi Shankar Prasad said. &ldquo;The bill that replaces it should reflect the general premises and sentiments of the Jan Lokpal bill.&rdquo;<br /><br />Bolstered by the BJP&rsquo;s turnaround, Hazare&rsquo;s associates Kejriwal, Prashant Bhushan and Kiran Bedi called on the BJP leaders late tonight at Advani&rsquo;s residence. Sources said they expected to be reassured that the BJP would not veer from the stand it fashioned today when the Lokpal issue is debated in Parliament tomorrow.<br /><br />The sources cited several reasons for Gadkari&rsquo;s somersault. They said he was pressured by the RSS and a section of the BJP to take a more strident stand on Hazare&rsquo;s fast after leaders like Yashwant Sinha and Shatrughan Sinha voiced concerns over the party yielding its political turf to &ldquo;civil society&rdquo; for &ldquo;want of clarity&rdquo; on the issue.<br /><br />The Sangh and the BJP dissenters, the sources said, felt that the parliamentary strategists were going &ldquo;soft&rdquo; on the government. A national executive member, close to the RSS, said he was &ldquo;unhappy&rdquo; with Lok Sabha Opposition leader Sushma readily associating the BJP with the Prime Minister&rsquo;s statement on the Hazare episode this morning.<br /><br />He wondered why the usually combative Sushma &ldquo;allowed&rdquo; Manmohan Singh to get away with his dare to the BJP to nail him on personal corruption.<br /><br />&ldquo;Nobody from our party suggested he was under a cloud. But as the UPA government&rsquo;s watchman, he slept through the 2G, CWG and other big scams and this point was not made by Sushma,&rdquo; he said.<br /><br />It is learnt that when Hazare brought up the BJP&rsquo;s &ldquo;fuzziness&rdquo; with Gadkari&rsquo;s colleagues, he was told that Sushma&rsquo;s brief address at the all-party meeting Singh had convened yesterday was in sync with the party&rsquo;s stand of supporting the Jan Lokpal bill.<br /><br />Gadkari&rsquo;s letter said Sushma had demanded that the government withdraw its Lokpal bill and supplant it with a more powerful one.<br /><br />To reinforce the message of &ldquo;solidarity&rdquo; with Hazare, Gadkari today floated a new outfit called the Yuva Vahini, which drew its cadres from the party&rsquo;s youth wing.<br /><br />The cadres not only replenished the crowd at Ramlila Maidan but also picketed the Prime Minister&rsquo;s residence.<br /><br />The sources, however, conceded that they had fewer differences with the government&rsquo;s version than with the Jan Lokpal bill. <br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 9661,
		'title' => 'BJP roots for Jan Lokpal in U-turn by Radhika Ramaseshan',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<br />
<div align="justify">
The BJP today rooted for Anna Hazare&rsquo;s version of the Lokpal bill, two days after it distanced itself from the draft, the somersault coming in a letter the party&rsquo;s president wrote to the fasting activist.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;We have always been and are for a strong Lokpal,&rdquo; Nitin Gadkari said in his letter. &ldquo;For that to happen, (the) BJP accepts your Jan Lokpal bill to be the basis for a strong and effective Lokpal to be put in place at the earliest without getting into procedural wrangles.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
The letter was written and despatched this evening by Gadkari&rsquo;s colleagues Jagat Nadda and Vinay Sahasthrabuddhe hours after Hazare associate Arvind Kejriwal had publicly challenged the BJP to spell out its stand on the Jan Lokpal bill.<br />
<br />
A meeting of the BJP&rsquo;s core committee that Gadkari chaired tonight placed its stamp of approval on his Jan Lokpal pitch. L.K. Advani, Sushma Swaraj and Arun Jaitley were among those who attended the meeting.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;Our demand is firstly the government should drop its Lokpal bill,&rdquo; spokesperson Ravi Shankar Prasad said. &ldquo;The bill that replaces it should reflect the general premises and sentiments of the Jan Lokpal bill.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
Bolstered by the BJP&rsquo;s turnaround, Hazare&rsquo;s associates Kejriwal, Prashant Bhushan and Kiran Bedi called on the BJP leaders late tonight at Advani&rsquo;s residence. Sources said they expected to be reassured that the BJP would not veer from the stand it fashioned today when the Lokpal issue is debated in Parliament tomorrow.<br />
<br />
The sources cited several reasons for Gadkari&rsquo;s somersault. They said he was pressured by the RSS and a section of the BJP to take a more strident stand on Hazare&rsquo;s fast after leaders like Yashwant Sinha and Shatrughan Sinha voiced concerns over the party yielding its political turf to &ldquo;civil society&rdquo; for &ldquo;want of clarity&rdquo; on the issue.<br />
<br />
The Sangh and the BJP dissenters, the sources said, felt that the parliamentary strategists were going &ldquo;soft&rdquo; on the government. A national executive member, close to the RSS, said he was &ldquo;unhappy&rdquo; with Lok Sabha Opposition leader Sushma readily associating the BJP with the Prime Minister&rsquo;s statement on the Hazare episode this morning.<br />
<br />
He wondered why the usually combative Sushma &ldquo;allowed&rdquo; Manmohan Singh to get away with his dare to the BJP to nail him on personal corruption.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;Nobody from our party suggested he was under a cloud. But as the UPA government&rsquo;s watchman, he slept through the 2G, CWG and other big scams and this point was not made by Sushma,&rdquo; he said.<br />
<br />
It is learnt that when Hazare brought up the BJP&rsquo;s &ldquo;fuzziness&rdquo; with Gadkari&rsquo;s colleagues, he was told that Sushma&rsquo;s brief address at the all-party meeting Singh had convened yesterday was in sync with the party&rsquo;s stand of supporting the Jan Lokpal bill.<br />
<br />
Gadkari&rsquo;s letter said Sushma had demanded that the government withdraw its Lokpal bill and supplant it with a more powerful one.<br />
<br />
To reinforce the message of &ldquo;solidarity&rdquo; with Hazare, Gadkari today floated a new outfit called the Yuva Vahini, which drew its cadres from the party&rsquo;s youth wing.<br />
<br />
The cadres not only replenished the crowd at Ramlila Maidan but also picketed the Prime Minister&rsquo;s residence.<br />
<br />
The sources, however, conceded that they had fewer differences with the government&rsquo;s version than with the Jan Lokpal bill. <br />
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 26 August, 2011, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1110826/jsp/nation/story_14426851.jsp',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'bjp-roots-for-jan-lokpal-in-u-turn-by-radhika-ramaseshan-9770',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 9770,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 9661,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | BJP roots for Jan Lokpal in U-turn by Radhika Ramaseshan',
	'metaKeywords' => 'lokpal bill',
	'metaDesc' => '

The BJP today rooted for Anna Hazare&rsquo;s version of the Lokpal bill, two days after it distanced itself from the draft, the somersault coming in a letter the party&rsquo;s president wrote to the fasting activist.

&ldquo;We have always been and are...',
	'disp' => '<br /><div align="justify">The BJP today rooted for Anna Hazare&rsquo;s version of the Lokpal bill, two days after it distanced itself from the draft, the somersault coming in a letter the party&rsquo;s president wrote to the fasting activist.<br /><br />&ldquo;We have always been and are for a strong Lokpal,&rdquo; Nitin Gadkari said in his letter. &ldquo;For that to happen, (the) BJP accepts your Jan Lokpal bill to be the basis for a strong and effective Lokpal to be put in place at the earliest without getting into procedural wrangles.&rdquo;<br /><br />The letter was written and despatched this evening by Gadkari&rsquo;s colleagues Jagat Nadda and Vinay Sahasthrabuddhe hours after Hazare associate Arvind Kejriwal had publicly challenged the BJP to spell out its stand on the Jan Lokpal bill.<br /><br />A meeting of the BJP&rsquo;s core committee that Gadkari chaired tonight placed its stamp of approval on his Jan Lokpal pitch. L.K. Advani, Sushma Swaraj and Arun Jaitley were among those who attended the meeting.<br /><br />&ldquo;Our demand is firstly the government should drop its Lokpal bill,&rdquo; spokesperson Ravi Shankar Prasad said. &ldquo;The bill that replaces it should reflect the general premises and sentiments of the Jan Lokpal bill.&rdquo;<br /><br />Bolstered by the BJP&rsquo;s turnaround, Hazare&rsquo;s associates Kejriwal, Prashant Bhushan and Kiran Bedi called on the BJP leaders late tonight at Advani&rsquo;s residence. Sources said they expected to be reassured that the BJP would not veer from the stand it fashioned today when the Lokpal issue is debated in Parliament tomorrow.<br /><br />The sources cited several reasons for Gadkari&rsquo;s somersault. They said he was pressured by the RSS and a section of the BJP to take a more strident stand on Hazare&rsquo;s fast after leaders like Yashwant Sinha and Shatrughan Sinha voiced concerns over the party yielding its political turf to &ldquo;civil society&rdquo; for &ldquo;want of clarity&rdquo; on the issue.<br /><br />The Sangh and the BJP dissenters, the sources said, felt that the parliamentary strategists were going &ldquo;soft&rdquo; on the government. A national executive member, close to the RSS, said he was &ldquo;unhappy&rdquo; with Lok Sabha Opposition leader Sushma readily associating the BJP with the Prime Minister&rsquo;s statement on the Hazare episode this morning.<br /><br />He wondered why the usually combative Sushma &ldquo;allowed&rdquo; Manmohan Singh to get away with his dare to the BJP to nail him on personal corruption.<br /><br />&ldquo;Nobody from our party suggested he was under a cloud. But as the UPA government&rsquo;s watchman, he slept through the 2G, CWG and other big scams and this point was not made by Sushma,&rdquo; he said.<br /><br />It is learnt that when Hazare brought up the BJP&rsquo;s &ldquo;fuzziness&rdquo; with Gadkari&rsquo;s colleagues, he was told that Sushma&rsquo;s brief address at the all-party meeting Singh had convened yesterday was in sync with the party&rsquo;s stand of supporting the Jan Lokpal bill.<br /><br />Gadkari&rsquo;s letter said Sushma had demanded that the government withdraw its Lokpal bill and supplant it with a more powerful one.<br /><br />To reinforce the message of &ldquo;solidarity&rdquo; with Hazare, Gadkari today floated a new outfit called the Yuva Vahini, which drew its cadres from the party&rsquo;s youth wing.<br /><br />The cadres not only replenished the crowd at Ramlila Maidan but also picketed the Prime Minister&rsquo;s residence.<br /><br />The sources, however, conceded that they had fewer differences with the government&rsquo;s version than with the Jan Lokpal bill. <br /></div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 9661,
	'title' => 'BJP roots for Jan Lokpal in U-turn by Radhika Ramaseshan',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<br />
<div align="justify">
The BJP today rooted for Anna Hazare&rsquo;s version of the Lokpal bill, two days after it distanced itself from the draft, the somersault coming in a letter the party&rsquo;s president wrote to the fasting activist.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;We have always been and are for a strong Lokpal,&rdquo; Nitin Gadkari said in his letter. &ldquo;For that to happen, (the) BJP accepts your Jan Lokpal bill to be the basis for a strong and effective Lokpal to be put in place at the earliest without getting into procedural wrangles.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
The letter was written and despatched this evening by Gadkari&rsquo;s colleagues Jagat Nadda and Vinay Sahasthrabuddhe hours after Hazare associate Arvind Kejriwal had publicly challenged the BJP to spell out its stand on the Jan Lokpal bill.<br />
<br />
A meeting of the BJP&rsquo;s core committee that Gadkari chaired tonight placed its stamp of approval on his Jan Lokpal pitch. L.K. Advani, Sushma Swaraj and Arun Jaitley were among those who attended the meeting.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;Our demand is firstly the government should drop its Lokpal bill,&rdquo; spokesperson Ravi Shankar Prasad said. &ldquo;The bill that replaces it should reflect the general premises and sentiments of the Jan Lokpal bill.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
Bolstered by the BJP&rsquo;s turnaround, Hazare&rsquo;s associates Kejriwal, Prashant Bhushan and Kiran Bedi called on the BJP leaders late tonight at Advani&rsquo;s residence. Sources said they expected to be reassured that the BJP would not veer from the stand it fashioned today when the Lokpal issue is debated in Parliament tomorrow.<br />
<br />
The sources cited several reasons for Gadkari&rsquo;s somersault. They said he was pressured by the RSS and a section of the BJP to take a more strident stand on Hazare&rsquo;s fast after leaders like Yashwant Sinha and Shatrughan Sinha voiced concerns over the party yielding its political turf to &ldquo;civil society&rdquo; for &ldquo;want of clarity&rdquo; on the issue.<br />
<br />
The Sangh and the BJP dissenters, the sources said, felt that the parliamentary strategists were going &ldquo;soft&rdquo; on the government. A national executive member, close to the RSS, said he was &ldquo;unhappy&rdquo; with Lok Sabha Opposition leader Sushma readily associating the BJP with the Prime Minister&rsquo;s statement on the Hazare episode this morning.<br />
<br />
He wondered why the usually combative Sushma &ldquo;allowed&rdquo; Manmohan Singh to get away with his dare to the BJP to nail him on personal corruption.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;Nobody from our party suggested he was under a cloud. But as the UPA government&rsquo;s watchman, he slept through the 2G, CWG and other big scams and this point was not made by Sushma,&rdquo; he said.<br />
<br />
It is learnt that when Hazare brought up the BJP&rsquo;s &ldquo;fuzziness&rdquo; with Gadkari&rsquo;s colleagues, he was told that Sushma&rsquo;s brief address at the all-party meeting Singh had convened yesterday was in sync with the party&rsquo;s stand of supporting the Jan Lokpal bill.<br />
<br />
Gadkari&rsquo;s letter said Sushma had demanded that the government withdraw its Lokpal bill and supplant it with a more powerful one.<br />
<br />
To reinforce the message of &ldquo;solidarity&rdquo; with Hazare, Gadkari today floated a new outfit called the Yuva Vahini, which drew its cadres from the party&rsquo;s youth wing.<br />
<br />
The cadres not only replenished the crowd at Ramlila Maidan but also picketed the Prime Minister&rsquo;s residence.<br />
<br />
The sources, however, conceded that they had fewer differences with the government&rsquo;s version than with the Jan Lokpal bill. <br />
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 26 August, 2011, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1110826/jsp/nation/story_14426851.jsp',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'bjp-roots-for-jan-lokpal-in-u-turn-by-radhika-ramaseshan-9770',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 9770,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 9661
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | BJP roots for Jan Lokpal in U-turn by Radhika Ramaseshan'
$metaKeywords = 'lokpal bill'
$metaDesc = '

The BJP today rooted for Anna Hazare&rsquo;s version of the Lokpal bill, two days after it distanced itself from the draft, the somersault coming in a letter the party&rsquo;s president wrote to the fasting activist.

&ldquo;We have always been and are...'
$disp = '<br /><div align="justify">The BJP today rooted for Anna Hazare&rsquo;s version of the Lokpal bill, two days after it distanced itself from the draft, the somersault coming in a letter the party&rsquo;s president wrote to the fasting activist.<br /><br />&ldquo;We have always been and are for a strong Lokpal,&rdquo; Nitin Gadkari said in his letter. &ldquo;For that to happen, (the) BJP accepts your Jan Lokpal bill to be the basis for a strong and effective Lokpal to be put in place at the earliest without getting into procedural wrangles.&rdquo;<br /><br />The letter was written and despatched this evening by Gadkari&rsquo;s colleagues Jagat Nadda and Vinay Sahasthrabuddhe hours after Hazare associate Arvind Kejriwal had publicly challenged the BJP to spell out its stand on the Jan Lokpal bill.<br /><br />A meeting of the BJP&rsquo;s core committee that Gadkari chaired tonight placed its stamp of approval on his Jan Lokpal pitch. L.K. Advani, Sushma Swaraj and Arun Jaitley were among those who attended the meeting.<br /><br />&ldquo;Our demand is firstly the government should drop its Lokpal bill,&rdquo; spokesperson Ravi Shankar Prasad said. &ldquo;The bill that replaces it should reflect the general premises and sentiments of the Jan Lokpal bill.&rdquo;<br /><br />Bolstered by the BJP&rsquo;s turnaround, Hazare&rsquo;s associates Kejriwal, Prashant Bhushan and Kiran Bedi called on the BJP leaders late tonight at Advani&rsquo;s residence. Sources said they expected to be reassured that the BJP would not veer from the stand it fashioned today when the Lokpal issue is debated in Parliament tomorrow.<br /><br />The sources cited several reasons for Gadkari&rsquo;s somersault. They said he was pressured by the RSS and a section of the BJP to take a more strident stand on Hazare&rsquo;s fast after leaders like Yashwant Sinha and Shatrughan Sinha voiced concerns over the party yielding its political turf to &ldquo;civil society&rdquo; for &ldquo;want of clarity&rdquo; on the issue.<br /><br />The Sangh and the BJP dissenters, the sources said, felt that the parliamentary strategists were going &ldquo;soft&rdquo; on the government. A national executive member, close to the RSS, said he was &ldquo;unhappy&rdquo; with Lok Sabha Opposition leader Sushma readily associating the BJP with the Prime Minister&rsquo;s statement on the Hazare episode this morning.<br /><br />He wondered why the usually combative Sushma &ldquo;allowed&rdquo; Manmohan Singh to get away with his dare to the BJP to nail him on personal corruption.<br /><br />&ldquo;Nobody from our party suggested he was under a cloud. But as the UPA government&rsquo;s watchman, he slept through the 2G, CWG and other big scams and this point was not made by Sushma,&rdquo; he said.<br /><br />It is learnt that when Hazare brought up the BJP&rsquo;s &ldquo;fuzziness&rdquo; with Gadkari&rsquo;s colleagues, he was told that Sushma&rsquo;s brief address at the all-party meeting Singh had convened yesterday was in sync with the party&rsquo;s stand of supporting the Jan Lokpal bill.<br /><br />Gadkari&rsquo;s letter said Sushma had demanded that the government withdraw its Lokpal bill and supplant it with a more powerful one.<br /><br />To reinforce the message of &ldquo;solidarity&rdquo; with Hazare, Gadkari today floated a new outfit called the Yuva Vahini, which drew its cadres from the party&rsquo;s youth wing.<br /><br />The cadres not only replenished the crowd at Ramlila Maidan but also picketed the Prime Minister&rsquo;s residence.<br /><br />The sources, however, conceded that they had fewer differences with the government&rsquo;s version than with the Jan Lokpal bill. <br /></div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

BJP roots for Jan Lokpal in U-turn by Radhika Ramaseshan

The BJP today rooted for Anna Hazare’s version of the Lokpal bill, two days after it distanced itself from the draft, the somersault coming in a letter the party’s president wrote to the fasting activist. “We have always been and are for a strong Lokpal,” Nitin Gadkari said in his letter. “For that to happen, (the) BJP accepts your Jan Lokpal bill to be the basis for a strong and effective Lokpal to be put in place at the earliest without getting into procedural wrangles.” The letter was written and despatched this evening by Gadkari’s colleagues Jagat Nadda and Vinay Sahasthrabuddhe hours after Hazare associate Arvind Kejriwal had publicly challenged the BJP to spell out its stand on the Jan Lokpal bill. A meeting of the BJP’s core committee that Gadkari chaired tonight placed its stamp of approval on his Jan Lokpal pitch. L.K. Advani, Sushma Swaraj and Arun Jaitley were among those who attended the meeting. “Our demand is firstly the government should drop its Lokpal bill,” spokesperson Ravi Shankar Prasad said. “The bill that replaces it should reflect the general premises and sentiments of the Jan Lokpal bill.” Bolstered by the BJP’s turnaround, Hazare’s associates Kejriwal, Prashant Bhushan and Kiran Bedi called on the BJP leaders late tonight at Advani’s residence. Sources said they expected to be reassured that the BJP would not veer from the stand it fashioned today when the Lokpal issue is debated in Parliament tomorrow. The sources cited several reasons for Gadkari’s somersault. They said he was pressured by the RSS and a section of the BJP to take a more strident stand on Hazare’s fast after leaders like Yashwant Sinha and Shatrughan Sinha voiced concerns over the party yielding its political turf to “civil society” for “want of clarity” on the issue. The Sangh and the BJP dissenters, the sources said, felt that the parliamentary strategists were going “soft” on the government. A national executive member, close to the RSS, said he was “unhappy” with Lok Sabha Opposition leader Sushma readily associating the BJP with the Prime Minister’s statement on the Hazare episode this morning. He wondered why the usually combative Sushma “allowed” Manmohan Singh to get away with his dare to the BJP to nail him on personal corruption. “Nobody from our party suggested he was under a cloud. But as the UPA government’s watchman, he slept through the 2G, CWG and other big scams and this point was not made by Sushma,” he said. It is learnt that when Hazare brought up the BJP’s “fuzziness” with Gadkari’s colleagues, he was told that Sushma’s brief address at the all-party meeting Singh had convened yesterday was in sync with the party’s stand of supporting the Jan Lokpal bill. Gadkari’s letter said Sushma had demanded that the government withdraw its Lokpal bill and supplant it with a more powerful one. To reinforce the message of “solidarity” with Hazare, Gadkari today floated a new outfit called the Yuva Vahini, which drew its cadres from the party’s youth wing. The cadres not only replenished the crowd at Ramlila Maidan but also picketed the Prime Minister’s residence. The sources, however, conceded that they had fewer differences with the government’s version than with the Jan Lokpal bill.