Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/bloggers-call-content-regulation-a-gag-on-freedom-by-srividya-iyer-6499/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/bloggers-call-content-regulation-a-gag-on-freedom-by-srividya-iyer-6499/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/bloggers-call-content-regulation-a-gag-on-freedom-by-srividya-iyer-6499/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/bloggers-call-content-regulation-a-gag-on-freedom-by-srividya-iyer-6499/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680497525dafd-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680497525dafd-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680497525dafd-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680497525dafd-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680497525dafd-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680497525dafd-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680497525dafd-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680497525dafd-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680497525dafd-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 6403,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Bloggers call content regulation a gag on freedom by Srividya Iyer&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
A proposed government move to regulate content on blogs has ignited a firestorm of protest from the blogging community which is accusing the government of restricting free speech and acting like the guardians of a police state. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the heart of the issue is the Indian IT Act which was amended in 2008 to incorporate the much-needed changes to clarify the legal position of intermediaries or those who provide web-hosting services, internet service providers and online auction sites. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, the term intermediaries, for some reason, was also broadened to include blogs, though they neither provide the same kind of services like the ISPs nor have large-scale commercial interests. The law stated that the government should clarify the rules under which the intermediaries should function and the list of prohibitions applicable to them. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The list was published sometime last month and comments were invited from members of the public, bloggers and other members of the intermediaries group. &amp;lsquo;Intermediaries&amp;rsquo; include web hosting providers which would include companies like Amazon , cyber-cafes, payment sites like Paypal , online auction sites, internet service providers like BSNL , Airtel etc. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Blogs also fall in this category as networked service providers. The due diligence specifies that the intermediaries should not display, upload, modify or publish any information that is &amp;lsquo;harmful&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;threatening&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;abusive&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;harassing&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;blasphemous&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;objectionable&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;defamatory&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;vulgar&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;obscene&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;pornographic&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;paedophilic&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;libellous&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;invasive of another&amp;rsquo;s privacy&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;hateful&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;disparaging&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;racially , ethnically or otherwise objectionable, &amp;lsquo;relating to money laundering or gambling&amp;rsquo;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;It&amp;rsquo;s a fundamentally flawed exercise. One has to keep in mind the nuanced role of bloggers. The government needs to understand the power of the blogging community,&amp;rdquo; said Pavan Duggal , senior advocate, Supreme Court and cyber law expert. &amp;ldquo;The blogosphere has to align themselves to the changes in the norm,&amp;rdquo; he said. &amp;ldquo;But since the term &amp;lsquo;intermediaries&amp;rsquo; is vaguely and loosely used, the bloggers are right when they express agitation,&amp;rdquo; he added. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A senior government official defended the government&amp;rsquo;s response. &amp;ldquo;We are in the process of finalising it. We welcome positive feedback and constructive criticism. We might have made a mistake in understanding the public aspect. The public could have a different view point,&amp;rdquo; said a senior government official. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bloggers fear that the government will use these omnibus terms to charge the writers with almost anything. On Twitter , online users expressed their anger and frustration in equal measure. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;We cannot let the government to play the judge, jury and the executioner in this. Our entire audience is Indian. If our site is blocked, we are gone. I am a small player, everything we have built goes away in one shot,&amp;rdquo; said Nikhil Pahwa, founder and editor of Medianama, a digital business news site. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The penalty under this law are of two kinds. Under the civil penalty, the intermediary could be sued for damage by compensation up to Rs 5 crore per contravention. The criminal penalty is imprisonment for three years to life imprisonment for the top management of the intermediary if it is a company. There are no exceptions to the due diligence. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The law can be a potential threat to online businesses. Players in this space believe that the guidelines are very broad and vague and there is no apparent recourse. &amp;ldquo;Why is the draft obsessed with bloggers, I don&amp;rsquo;t know. The rules are so vast that they cause annoyance. Who defines that the content is objectionable?,&amp;rdquo; asks Shivam Vij who is a regular contributor to Kafila, a blog that comments on media and politics. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Blogs in India are slowly gaining traction. According to the Vizisense, an online audience measurement site, Indian blogs attracted traffic close to 31 million unique users in January.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Economic Times, 9 March, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/tech/internet/bloggers-call-content-regulation-a-gag-on-freedom/articleshow/7659593.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;bloggers-call-content-regulation-a-gag-on-freedom-by-srividya-iyer-6499&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6499,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6403,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Bloggers call content regulation a gag on freedom by Srividya Iyer&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Human Rights,media&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
A proposed government move to regulate content on blogs has ignited a firestorm of protest from the blogging community which is accusing the government of restricting free speech and acting like the guardians of a police state. 

At the heart...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;A proposed government move to regulate content on blogs has ignited a firestorm of protest from the blogging community which is accusing the government of restricting free speech and acting like the guardians of a police state. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;At the heart of the issue is the Indian IT Act which was amended in 2008 to incorporate the much-needed changes to clarify the legal position of intermediaries or those who provide web-hosting services, internet service providers and online auction sites. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, the term intermediaries, for some reason, was also broadened to include blogs, though they neither provide the same kind of services like the ISPs nor have large-scale commercial interests. The law stated that the government should clarify the rules under which the intermediaries should function and the list of prohibitions applicable to them. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The list was published sometime last month and comments were invited from members of the public, bloggers and other members of the intermediaries group. &amp;lsquo;Intermediaries&amp;rsquo; include web hosting providers which would include companies like Amazon , cyber-cafes, payment sites like Paypal , online auction sites, internet service providers like BSNL , Airtel etc. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Blogs also fall in this category as networked service providers. The due diligence specifies that the intermediaries should not display, upload, modify or publish any information that is &amp;lsquo;harmful&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;threatening&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;abusive&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;harassing&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;blasphemous&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;objectionable&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;defamatory&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;vulgar&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;obscene&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;pornographic&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;paedophilic&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;libellous&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;invasive of another&amp;rsquo;s privacy&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;hateful&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;disparaging&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;racially , ethnically or otherwise objectionable, &amp;lsquo;relating to money laundering or gambling&amp;rsquo;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;It&amp;rsquo;s a fundamentally flawed exercise. One has to keep in mind the nuanced role of bloggers. The government needs to understand the power of the blogging community,&amp;rdquo; said Pavan Duggal , senior advocate, Supreme Court and cyber law expert. &amp;ldquo;The blogosphere has to align themselves to the changes in the norm,&amp;rdquo; he said. &amp;ldquo;But since the term &amp;lsquo;intermediaries&amp;rsquo; is vaguely and loosely used, the bloggers are right when they express agitation,&amp;rdquo; he added. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A senior government official defended the government&amp;rsquo;s response. &amp;ldquo;We are in the process of finalising it. We welcome positive feedback and constructive criticism. We might have made a mistake in understanding the public aspect. The public could have a different view point,&amp;rdquo; said a senior government official. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Bloggers fear that the government will use these omnibus terms to charge the writers with almost anything. On Twitter , online users expressed their anger and frustration in equal measure. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;We cannot let the government to play the judge, jury and the executioner in this. Our entire audience is Indian. If our site is blocked, we are gone. I am a small player, everything we have built goes away in one shot,&amp;rdquo; said Nikhil Pahwa, founder and editor of Medianama, a digital business news site. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The penalty under this law are of two kinds. Under the civil penalty, the intermediary could be sued for damage by compensation up to Rs 5 crore per contravention. The criminal penalty is imprisonment for three years to life imprisonment for the top management of the intermediary if it is a company. There are no exceptions to the due diligence. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The law can be a potential threat to online businesses. Players in this space believe that the guidelines are very broad and vague and there is no apparent recourse. &amp;ldquo;Why is the draft obsessed with bloggers, I don&amp;rsquo;t know. The rules are so vast that they cause annoyance. Who defines that the content is objectionable?,&amp;rdquo; asks Shivam Vij who is a regular contributor to Kafila, a blog that comments on media and politics. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Blogs in India are slowly gaining traction. According to the Vizisense, an online audience measurement site, Indian blogs attracted traffic close to 31 million unique users in January.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 6403,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Bloggers call content regulation a gag on freedom by Srividya Iyer&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
A proposed government move to regulate content on blogs has ignited a firestorm of protest from the blogging community which is accusing the government of restricting free speech and acting like the guardians of a police state. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the heart of the issue is the Indian IT Act which was amended in 2008 to incorporate the much-needed changes to clarify the legal position of intermediaries or those who provide web-hosting services, internet service providers and online auction sites. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, the term intermediaries, for some reason, was also broadened to include blogs, though they neither provide the same kind of services like the ISPs nor have large-scale commercial interests. The law stated that the government should clarify the rules under which the intermediaries should function and the list of prohibitions applicable to them. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The list was published sometime last month and comments were invited from members of the public, bloggers and other members of the intermediaries group. &amp;lsquo;Intermediaries&amp;rsquo; include web hosting providers which would include companies like Amazon , cyber-cafes, payment sites like Paypal , online auction sites, internet service providers like BSNL , Airtel etc. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Blogs also fall in this category as networked service providers. The due diligence specifies that the intermediaries should not display, upload, modify or publish any information that is &amp;lsquo;harmful&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;threatening&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;abusive&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;harassing&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;blasphemous&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;objectionable&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;defamatory&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;vulgar&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;obscene&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;pornographic&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;paedophilic&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;libellous&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;invasive of another&amp;rsquo;s privacy&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;hateful&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;disparaging&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;racially , ethnically or otherwise objectionable, &amp;lsquo;relating to money laundering or gambling&amp;rsquo;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;It&amp;rsquo;s a fundamentally flawed exercise. One has to keep in mind the nuanced role of bloggers. The government needs to understand the power of the blogging community,&amp;rdquo; said Pavan Duggal , senior advocate, Supreme Court and cyber law expert. &amp;ldquo;The blogosphere has to align themselves to the changes in the norm,&amp;rdquo; he said. &amp;ldquo;But since the term &amp;lsquo;intermediaries&amp;rsquo; is vaguely and loosely used, the bloggers are right when they express agitation,&amp;rdquo; he added. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A senior government official defended the government&amp;rsquo;s response. &amp;ldquo;We are in the process of finalising it. We welcome positive feedback and constructive criticism. We might have made a mistake in understanding the public aspect. The public could have a different view point,&amp;rdquo; said a senior government official. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bloggers fear that the government will use these omnibus terms to charge the writers with almost anything. On Twitter , online users expressed their anger and frustration in equal measure. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;We cannot let the government to play the judge, jury and the executioner in this. Our entire audience is Indian. If our site is blocked, we are gone. I am a small player, everything we have built goes away in one shot,&amp;rdquo; said Nikhil Pahwa, founder and editor of Medianama, a digital business news site. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The penalty under this law are of two kinds. Under the civil penalty, the intermediary could be sued for damage by compensation up to Rs 5 crore per contravention. The criminal penalty is imprisonment for three years to life imprisonment for the top management of the intermediary if it is a company. There are no exceptions to the due diligence. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The law can be a potential threat to online businesses. Players in this space believe that the guidelines are very broad and vague and there is no apparent recourse. &amp;ldquo;Why is the draft obsessed with bloggers, I don&amp;rsquo;t know. The rules are so vast that they cause annoyance. Who defines that the content is objectionable?,&amp;rdquo; asks Shivam Vij who is a regular contributor to Kafila, a blog that comments on media and politics. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Blogs in India are slowly gaining traction. According to the Vizisense, an online audience measurement site, Indian blogs attracted traffic close to 31 million unique users in January.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Economic Times, 9 March, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/tech/internet/bloggers-call-content-regulation-a-gag-on-freedom/articleshow/7659593.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;bloggers-call-content-regulation-a-gag-on-freedom-by-srividya-iyer-6499&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6499,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 6403
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Bloggers call content regulation a gag on freedom by Srividya Iyer&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Human Rights,media&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
A proposed government move to regulate content on blogs has ignited a firestorm of protest from the blogging community which is accusing the government of restricting free speech and acting like the guardians of a police state. 

At the heart...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;A proposed government move to regulate content on blogs has ignited a firestorm of protest from the blogging community which is accusing the government of restricting free speech and acting like the guardians of a police state. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;At the heart of the issue is the Indian IT Act which was amended in 2008 to incorporate the much-needed changes to clarify the legal position of intermediaries or those who provide web-hosting services, internet service providers and online auction sites. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, the term intermediaries, for some reason, was also broadened to include blogs, though they neither provide the same kind of services like the ISPs nor have large-scale commercial interests. The law stated that the government should clarify the rules under which the intermediaries should function and the list of prohibitions applicable to them. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The list was published sometime last month and comments were invited from members of the public, bloggers and other members of the intermediaries group. &amp;lsquo;Intermediaries&amp;rsquo; include web hosting providers which would include companies like Amazon , cyber-cafes, payment sites like Paypal , online auction sites, internet service providers like BSNL , Airtel etc. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Blogs also fall in this category as networked service providers. The due diligence specifies that the intermediaries should not display, upload, modify or publish any information that is &amp;lsquo;harmful&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;threatening&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;abusive&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;harassing&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;blasphemous&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;objectionable&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;defamatory&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;vulgar&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;obscene&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;pornographic&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;paedophilic&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;libellous&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;invasive of another&amp;rsquo;s privacy&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;hateful&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;disparaging&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;racially , ethnically or otherwise objectionable, &amp;lsquo;relating to money laundering or gambling&amp;rsquo;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;It&amp;rsquo;s a fundamentally flawed exercise. One has to keep in mind the nuanced role of bloggers. The government needs to understand the power of the blogging community,&amp;rdquo; said Pavan Duggal , senior advocate, Supreme Court and cyber law expert. &amp;ldquo;The blogosphere has to align themselves to the changes in the norm,&amp;rdquo; he said. &amp;ldquo;But since the term &amp;lsquo;intermediaries&amp;rsquo; is vaguely and loosely used, the bloggers are right when they express agitation,&amp;rdquo; he added. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A senior government official defended the government&amp;rsquo;s response. &amp;ldquo;We are in the process of finalising it. We welcome positive feedback and constructive criticism. We might have made a mistake in understanding the public aspect. The public could have a different view point,&amp;rdquo; said a senior government official. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Bloggers fear that the government will use these omnibus terms to charge the writers with almost anything. On Twitter , online users expressed their anger and frustration in equal measure. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;We cannot let the government to play the judge, jury and the executioner in this. Our entire audience is Indian. If our site is blocked, we are gone. I am a small player, everything we have built goes away in one shot,&amp;rdquo; said Nikhil Pahwa, founder and editor of Medianama, a digital business news site. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The penalty under this law are of two kinds. Under the civil penalty, the intermediary could be sued for damage by compensation up to Rs 5 crore per contravention. The criminal penalty is imprisonment for three years to life imprisonment for the top management of the intermediary if it is a company. There are no exceptions to the due diligence. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The law can be a potential threat to online businesses. Players in this space believe that the guidelines are very broad and vague and there is no apparent recourse. &amp;ldquo;Why is the draft obsessed with bloggers, I don&amp;rsquo;t know. The rules are so vast that they cause annoyance. Who defines that the content is objectionable?,&amp;rdquo; asks Shivam Vij who is a regular contributor to Kafila, a blog that comments on media and politics. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Blogs in India are slowly gaining traction. According to the Vizisense, an online audience measurement site, Indian blogs attracted traffic close to 31 million unique users in January.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/bloggers-call-content-regulation-a-gag-on-freedom-by-srividya-iyer-6499.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Bloggers call content regulation a gag on freedom by Srividya Iyer | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
A proposed government move to regulate content on blogs has ignited a firestorm of protest from the blogging community which is accusing the government of restricting free speech and acting like the guardians of a police state. 

At the heart..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Bloggers call content regulation a gag on freedom by Srividya Iyer</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">A proposed government move to regulate content on blogs has ignited a firestorm of protest from the blogging community which is accusing the government of restricting free speech and acting like the guardians of a police state. <br /><br />At the heart of the issue is the Indian IT Act which was amended in 2008 to incorporate the much-needed changes to clarify the legal position of intermediaries or those who provide web-hosting services, internet service providers and online auction sites. <br /><br />However, the term intermediaries, for some reason, was also broadened to include blogs, though they neither provide the same kind of services like the ISPs nor have large-scale commercial interests. The law stated that the government should clarify the rules under which the intermediaries should function and the list of prohibitions applicable to them. <br /><br />The list was published sometime last month and comments were invited from members of the public, bloggers and other members of the intermediaries group. &lsquo;Intermediaries&rsquo; include web hosting providers which would include companies like Amazon , cyber-cafes, payment sites like Paypal , online auction sites, internet service providers like BSNL , Airtel etc. <br /><br />Blogs also fall in this category as networked service providers. The due diligence specifies that the intermediaries should not display, upload, modify or publish any information that is &lsquo;harmful&rsquo;, &lsquo;threatening&rsquo;, &lsquo;abusive&rsquo;, &lsquo;harassing&rsquo;, &lsquo;blasphemous&rsquo;, &lsquo;objectionable&rsquo;, &lsquo;defamatory&rsquo;, &lsquo;vulgar&rsquo;, &lsquo;obscene&rsquo;, &lsquo;pornographic&rsquo;, &lsquo;paedophilic&rsquo;, &lsquo;libellous&rsquo;, &lsquo;invasive of another&rsquo;s privacy&rsquo;, &lsquo;hateful&rsquo;, &lsquo;disparaging&rsquo;, &lsquo;racially , ethnically or otherwise objectionable, &lsquo;relating to money laundering or gambling&rsquo;. <br /><br />&ldquo;It&rsquo;s a fundamentally flawed exercise. One has to keep in mind the nuanced role of bloggers. The government needs to understand the power of the blogging community,&rdquo; said Pavan Duggal , senior advocate, Supreme Court and cyber law expert. &ldquo;The blogosphere has to align themselves to the changes in the norm,&rdquo; he said. &ldquo;But since the term &lsquo;intermediaries&rsquo; is vaguely and loosely used, the bloggers are right when they express agitation,&rdquo; he added. <br /><br />A senior government official defended the government&rsquo;s response. &ldquo;We are in the process of finalising it. We welcome positive feedback and constructive criticism. We might have made a mistake in understanding the public aspect. The public could have a different view point,&rdquo; said a senior government official. <br /><br />Bloggers fear that the government will use these omnibus terms to charge the writers with almost anything. On Twitter , online users expressed their anger and frustration in equal measure. <br /><br />&ldquo;We cannot let the government to play the judge, jury and the executioner in this. Our entire audience is Indian. If our site is blocked, we are gone. I am a small player, everything we have built goes away in one shot,&rdquo; said Nikhil Pahwa, founder and editor of Medianama, a digital business news site. <br /><br />The penalty under this law are of two kinds. Under the civil penalty, the intermediary could be sued for damage by compensation up to Rs 5 crore per contravention. The criminal penalty is imprisonment for three years to life imprisonment for the top management of the intermediary if it is a company. There are no exceptions to the due diligence. <br /><br />The law can be a potential threat to online businesses. Players in this space believe that the guidelines are very broad and vague and there is no apparent recourse. &ldquo;Why is the draft obsessed with bloggers, I don&rsquo;t know. The rules are so vast that they cause annoyance. Who defines that the content is objectionable?,&rdquo; asks Shivam Vij who is a regular contributor to Kafila, a blog that comments on media and politics. <br /><br />Blogs in India are slowly gaining traction. According to the Vizisense, an online audience measurement site, Indian blogs attracted traffic close to 31 million unique users in January.<br /><br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680497525dafd-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680497525dafd-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680497525dafd-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680497525dafd-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680497525dafd-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680497525dafd-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680497525dafd-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680497525dafd-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680497525dafd-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 6403,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Bloggers call content regulation a gag on freedom by Srividya Iyer&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
A proposed government move to regulate content on blogs has ignited a firestorm of protest from the blogging community which is accusing the government of restricting free speech and acting like the guardians of a police state. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the heart of the issue is the Indian IT Act which was amended in 2008 to incorporate the much-needed changes to clarify the legal position of intermediaries or those who provide web-hosting services, internet service providers and online auction sites. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, the term intermediaries, for some reason, was also broadened to include blogs, though they neither provide the same kind of services like the ISPs nor have large-scale commercial interests. The law stated that the government should clarify the rules under which the intermediaries should function and the list of prohibitions applicable to them. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The list was published sometime last month and comments were invited from members of the public, bloggers and other members of the intermediaries group. &amp;lsquo;Intermediaries&amp;rsquo; include web hosting providers which would include companies like Amazon , cyber-cafes, payment sites like Paypal , online auction sites, internet service providers like BSNL , Airtel etc. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Blogs also fall in this category as networked service providers. The due diligence specifies that the intermediaries should not display, upload, modify or publish any information that is &amp;lsquo;harmful&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;threatening&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;abusive&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;harassing&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;blasphemous&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;objectionable&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;defamatory&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;vulgar&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;obscene&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;pornographic&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;paedophilic&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;libellous&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;invasive of another&amp;rsquo;s privacy&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;hateful&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;disparaging&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;racially , ethnically or otherwise objectionable, &amp;lsquo;relating to money laundering or gambling&amp;rsquo;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;It&amp;rsquo;s a fundamentally flawed exercise. One has to keep in mind the nuanced role of bloggers. The government needs to understand the power of the blogging community,&amp;rdquo; said Pavan Duggal , senior advocate, Supreme Court and cyber law expert. &amp;ldquo;The blogosphere has to align themselves to the changes in the norm,&amp;rdquo; he said. &amp;ldquo;But since the term &amp;lsquo;intermediaries&amp;rsquo; is vaguely and loosely used, the bloggers are right when they express agitation,&amp;rdquo; he added. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A senior government official defended the government&amp;rsquo;s response. &amp;ldquo;We are in the process of finalising it. We welcome positive feedback and constructive criticism. We might have made a mistake in understanding the public aspect. The public could have a different view point,&amp;rdquo; said a senior government official. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bloggers fear that the government will use these omnibus terms to charge the writers with almost anything. On Twitter , online users expressed their anger and frustration in equal measure. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;We cannot let the government to play the judge, jury and the executioner in this. Our entire audience is Indian. If our site is blocked, we are gone. I am a small player, everything we have built goes away in one shot,&amp;rdquo; said Nikhil Pahwa, founder and editor of Medianama, a digital business news site. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The penalty under this law are of two kinds. Under the civil penalty, the intermediary could be sued for damage by compensation up to Rs 5 crore per contravention. The criminal penalty is imprisonment for three years to life imprisonment for the top management of the intermediary if it is a company. There are no exceptions to the due diligence. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The law can be a potential threat to online businesses. Players in this space believe that the guidelines are very broad and vague and there is no apparent recourse. &amp;ldquo;Why is the draft obsessed with bloggers, I don&amp;rsquo;t know. The rules are so vast that they cause annoyance. Who defines that the content is objectionable?,&amp;rdquo; asks Shivam Vij who is a regular contributor to Kafila, a blog that comments on media and politics. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Blogs in India are slowly gaining traction. According to the Vizisense, an online audience measurement site, Indian blogs attracted traffic close to 31 million unique users in January.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Economic Times, 9 March, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/tech/internet/bloggers-call-content-regulation-a-gag-on-freedom/articleshow/7659593.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;bloggers-call-content-regulation-a-gag-on-freedom-by-srividya-iyer-6499&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6499,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6403,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Bloggers call content regulation a gag on freedom by Srividya Iyer&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Human Rights,media&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
A proposed government move to regulate content on blogs has ignited a firestorm of protest from the blogging community which is accusing the government of restricting free speech and acting like the guardians of a police state. 

At the heart...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;A proposed government move to regulate content on blogs has ignited a firestorm of protest from the blogging community which is accusing the government of restricting free speech and acting like the guardians of a police state. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;At the heart of the issue is the Indian IT Act which was amended in 2008 to incorporate the much-needed changes to clarify the legal position of intermediaries or those who provide web-hosting services, internet service providers and online auction sites. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, the term intermediaries, for some reason, was also broadened to include blogs, though they neither provide the same kind of services like the ISPs nor have large-scale commercial interests. The law stated that the government should clarify the rules under which the intermediaries should function and the list of prohibitions applicable to them. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The list was published sometime last month and comments were invited from members of the public, bloggers and other members of the intermediaries group. &amp;lsquo;Intermediaries&amp;rsquo; include web hosting providers which would include companies like Amazon , cyber-cafes, payment sites like Paypal , online auction sites, internet service providers like BSNL , Airtel etc. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Blogs also fall in this category as networked service providers. The due diligence specifies that the intermediaries should not display, upload, modify or publish any information that is &amp;lsquo;harmful&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;threatening&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;abusive&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;harassing&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;blasphemous&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;objectionable&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;defamatory&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;vulgar&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;obscene&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;pornographic&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;paedophilic&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;libellous&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;invasive of another&amp;rsquo;s privacy&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;hateful&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;disparaging&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;racially , ethnically or otherwise objectionable, &amp;lsquo;relating to money laundering or gambling&amp;rsquo;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;It&amp;rsquo;s a fundamentally flawed exercise. One has to keep in mind the nuanced role of bloggers. The government needs to understand the power of the blogging community,&amp;rdquo; said Pavan Duggal , senior advocate, Supreme Court and cyber law expert. &amp;ldquo;The blogosphere has to align themselves to the changes in the norm,&amp;rdquo; he said. &amp;ldquo;But since the term &amp;lsquo;intermediaries&amp;rsquo; is vaguely and loosely used, the bloggers are right when they express agitation,&amp;rdquo; he added. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A senior government official defended the government&amp;rsquo;s response. &amp;ldquo;We are in the process of finalising it. We welcome positive feedback and constructive criticism. We might have made a mistake in understanding the public aspect. The public could have a different view point,&amp;rdquo; said a senior government official. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Bloggers fear that the government will use these omnibus terms to charge the writers with almost anything. On Twitter , online users expressed their anger and frustration in equal measure. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;We cannot let the government to play the judge, jury and the executioner in this. Our entire audience is Indian. If our site is blocked, we are gone. I am a small player, everything we have built goes away in one shot,&amp;rdquo; said Nikhil Pahwa, founder and editor of Medianama, a digital business news site. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The penalty under this law are of two kinds. Under the civil penalty, the intermediary could be sued for damage by compensation up to Rs 5 crore per contravention. The criminal penalty is imprisonment for three years to life imprisonment for the top management of the intermediary if it is a company. There are no exceptions to the due diligence. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The law can be a potential threat to online businesses. Players in this space believe that the guidelines are very broad and vague and there is no apparent recourse. &amp;ldquo;Why is the draft obsessed with bloggers, I don&amp;rsquo;t know. The rules are so vast that they cause annoyance. Who defines that the content is objectionable?,&amp;rdquo; asks Shivam Vij who is a regular contributor to Kafila, a blog that comments on media and politics. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Blogs in India are slowly gaining traction. According to the Vizisense, an online audience measurement site, Indian blogs attracted traffic close to 31 million unique users in January.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 6403,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Bloggers call content regulation a gag on freedom by Srividya Iyer&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
A proposed government move to regulate content on blogs has ignited a firestorm of protest from the blogging community which is accusing the government of restricting free speech and acting like the guardians of a police state. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the heart of the issue is the Indian IT Act which was amended in 2008 to incorporate the much-needed changes to clarify the legal position of intermediaries or those who provide web-hosting services, internet service providers and online auction sites. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, the term intermediaries, for some reason, was also broadened to include blogs, though they neither provide the same kind of services like the ISPs nor have large-scale commercial interests. The law stated that the government should clarify the rules under which the intermediaries should function and the list of prohibitions applicable to them. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The list was published sometime last month and comments were invited from members of the public, bloggers and other members of the intermediaries group. &amp;lsquo;Intermediaries&amp;rsquo; include web hosting providers which would include companies like Amazon , cyber-cafes, payment sites like Paypal , online auction sites, internet service providers like BSNL , Airtel etc. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Blogs also fall in this category as networked service providers. The due diligence specifies that the intermediaries should not display, upload, modify or publish any information that is &amp;lsquo;harmful&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;threatening&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;abusive&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;harassing&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;blasphemous&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;objectionable&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;defamatory&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;vulgar&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;obscene&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;pornographic&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;paedophilic&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;libellous&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;invasive of another&amp;rsquo;s privacy&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;hateful&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;disparaging&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;racially , ethnically or otherwise objectionable, &amp;lsquo;relating to money laundering or gambling&amp;rsquo;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;It&amp;rsquo;s a fundamentally flawed exercise. One has to keep in mind the nuanced role of bloggers. The government needs to understand the power of the blogging community,&amp;rdquo; said Pavan Duggal , senior advocate, Supreme Court and cyber law expert. &amp;ldquo;The blogosphere has to align themselves to the changes in the norm,&amp;rdquo; he said. &amp;ldquo;But since the term &amp;lsquo;intermediaries&amp;rsquo; is vaguely and loosely used, the bloggers are right when they express agitation,&amp;rdquo; he added. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A senior government official defended the government&amp;rsquo;s response. &amp;ldquo;We are in the process of finalising it. We welcome positive feedback and constructive criticism. We might have made a mistake in understanding the public aspect. The public could have a different view point,&amp;rdquo; said a senior government official. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bloggers fear that the government will use these omnibus terms to charge the writers with almost anything. On Twitter , online users expressed their anger and frustration in equal measure. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;We cannot let the government to play the judge, jury and the executioner in this. Our entire audience is Indian. If our site is blocked, we are gone. I am a small player, everything we have built goes away in one shot,&amp;rdquo; said Nikhil Pahwa, founder and editor of Medianama, a digital business news site. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The penalty under this law are of two kinds. Under the civil penalty, the intermediary could be sued for damage by compensation up to Rs 5 crore per contravention. The criminal penalty is imprisonment for three years to life imprisonment for the top management of the intermediary if it is a company. There are no exceptions to the due diligence. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The law can be a potential threat to online businesses. Players in this space believe that the guidelines are very broad and vague and there is no apparent recourse. &amp;ldquo;Why is the draft obsessed with bloggers, I don&amp;rsquo;t know. The rules are so vast that they cause annoyance. Who defines that the content is objectionable?,&amp;rdquo; asks Shivam Vij who is a regular contributor to Kafila, a blog that comments on media and politics. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Blogs in India are slowly gaining traction. According to the Vizisense, an online audience measurement site, Indian blogs attracted traffic close to 31 million unique users in January.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Economic Times, 9 March, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/tech/internet/bloggers-call-content-regulation-a-gag-on-freedom/articleshow/7659593.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;bloggers-call-content-regulation-a-gag-on-freedom-by-srividya-iyer-6499&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6499,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 6403
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Bloggers call content regulation a gag on freedom by Srividya Iyer&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Human Rights,media&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
A proposed government move to regulate content on blogs has ignited a firestorm of protest from the blogging community which is accusing the government of restricting free speech and acting like the guardians of a police state. 

At the heart...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;A proposed government move to regulate content on blogs has ignited a firestorm of protest from the blogging community which is accusing the government of restricting free speech and acting like the guardians of a police state. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;At the heart of the issue is the Indian IT Act which was amended in 2008 to incorporate the much-needed changes to clarify the legal position of intermediaries or those who provide web-hosting services, internet service providers and online auction sites. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, the term intermediaries, for some reason, was also broadened to include blogs, though they neither provide the same kind of services like the ISPs nor have large-scale commercial interests. The law stated that the government should clarify the rules under which the intermediaries should function and the list of prohibitions applicable to them. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The list was published sometime last month and comments were invited from members of the public, bloggers and other members of the intermediaries group. &amp;lsquo;Intermediaries&amp;rsquo; include web hosting providers which would include companies like Amazon , cyber-cafes, payment sites like Paypal , online auction sites, internet service providers like BSNL , Airtel etc. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Blogs also fall in this category as networked service providers. The due diligence specifies that the intermediaries should not display, upload, modify or publish any information that is &amp;lsquo;harmful&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;threatening&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;abusive&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;harassing&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;blasphemous&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;objectionable&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;defamatory&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;vulgar&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;obscene&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;pornographic&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;paedophilic&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;libellous&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;invasive of another&amp;rsquo;s privacy&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;hateful&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;disparaging&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;racially , ethnically or otherwise objectionable, &amp;lsquo;relating to money laundering or gambling&amp;rsquo;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;It&amp;rsquo;s a fundamentally flawed exercise. One has to keep in mind the nuanced role of bloggers. The government needs to understand the power of the blogging community,&amp;rdquo; said Pavan Duggal , senior advocate, Supreme Court and cyber law expert. &amp;ldquo;The blogosphere has to align themselves to the changes in the norm,&amp;rdquo; he said. &amp;ldquo;But since the term &amp;lsquo;intermediaries&amp;rsquo; is vaguely and loosely used, the bloggers are right when they express agitation,&amp;rdquo; he added. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A senior government official defended the government&amp;rsquo;s response. &amp;ldquo;We are in the process of finalising it. We welcome positive feedback and constructive criticism. We might have made a mistake in understanding the public aspect. The public could have a different view point,&amp;rdquo; said a senior government official. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Bloggers fear that the government will use these omnibus terms to charge the writers with almost anything. On Twitter , online users expressed their anger and frustration in equal measure. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;We cannot let the government to play the judge, jury and the executioner in this. Our entire audience is Indian. If our site is blocked, we are gone. I am a small player, everything we have built goes away in one shot,&amp;rdquo; said Nikhil Pahwa, founder and editor of Medianama, a digital business news site. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The penalty under this law are of two kinds. Under the civil penalty, the intermediary could be sued for damage by compensation up to Rs 5 crore per contravention. The criminal penalty is imprisonment for three years to life imprisonment for the top management of the intermediary if it is a company. There are no exceptions to the due diligence. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The law can be a potential threat to online businesses. Players in this space believe that the guidelines are very broad and vague and there is no apparent recourse. &amp;ldquo;Why is the draft obsessed with bloggers, I don&amp;rsquo;t know. The rules are so vast that they cause annoyance. Who defines that the content is objectionable?,&amp;rdquo; asks Shivam Vij who is a regular contributor to Kafila, a blog that comments on media and politics. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Blogs in India are slowly gaining traction. According to the Vizisense, an online audience measurement site, Indian blogs attracted traffic close to 31 million unique users in January.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/bloggers-call-content-regulation-a-gag-on-freedom-by-srividya-iyer-6499.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Bloggers call content regulation a gag on freedom by Srividya Iyer | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
A proposed government move to regulate content on blogs has ignited a firestorm of protest from the blogging community which is accusing the government of restricting free speech and acting like the guardians of a police state. 

At the heart..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Bloggers call content regulation a gag on freedom by Srividya Iyer</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">A proposed government move to regulate content on blogs has ignited a firestorm of protest from the blogging community which is accusing the government of restricting free speech and acting like the guardians of a police state. <br /><br />At the heart of the issue is the Indian IT Act which was amended in 2008 to incorporate the much-needed changes to clarify the legal position of intermediaries or those who provide web-hosting services, internet service providers and online auction sites. <br /><br />However, the term intermediaries, for some reason, was also broadened to include blogs, though they neither provide the same kind of services like the ISPs nor have large-scale commercial interests. The law stated that the government should clarify the rules under which the intermediaries should function and the list of prohibitions applicable to them. <br /><br />The list was published sometime last month and comments were invited from members of the public, bloggers and other members of the intermediaries group. &lsquo;Intermediaries&rsquo; include web hosting providers which would include companies like Amazon , cyber-cafes, payment sites like Paypal , online auction sites, internet service providers like BSNL , Airtel etc. <br /><br />Blogs also fall in this category as networked service providers. The due diligence specifies that the intermediaries should not display, upload, modify or publish any information that is &lsquo;harmful&rsquo;, &lsquo;threatening&rsquo;, &lsquo;abusive&rsquo;, &lsquo;harassing&rsquo;, &lsquo;blasphemous&rsquo;, &lsquo;objectionable&rsquo;, &lsquo;defamatory&rsquo;, &lsquo;vulgar&rsquo;, &lsquo;obscene&rsquo;, &lsquo;pornographic&rsquo;, &lsquo;paedophilic&rsquo;, &lsquo;libellous&rsquo;, &lsquo;invasive of another&rsquo;s privacy&rsquo;, &lsquo;hateful&rsquo;, &lsquo;disparaging&rsquo;, &lsquo;racially , ethnically or otherwise objectionable, &lsquo;relating to money laundering or gambling&rsquo;. <br /><br />&ldquo;It&rsquo;s a fundamentally flawed exercise. One has to keep in mind the nuanced role of bloggers. The government needs to understand the power of the blogging community,&rdquo; said Pavan Duggal , senior advocate, Supreme Court and cyber law expert. &ldquo;The blogosphere has to align themselves to the changes in the norm,&rdquo; he said. &ldquo;But since the term &lsquo;intermediaries&rsquo; is vaguely and loosely used, the bloggers are right when they express agitation,&rdquo; he added. <br /><br />A senior government official defended the government&rsquo;s response. &ldquo;We are in the process of finalising it. We welcome positive feedback and constructive criticism. We might have made a mistake in understanding the public aspect. The public could have a different view point,&rdquo; said a senior government official. <br /><br />Bloggers fear that the government will use these omnibus terms to charge the writers with almost anything. On Twitter , online users expressed their anger and frustration in equal measure. <br /><br />&ldquo;We cannot let the government to play the judge, jury and the executioner in this. Our entire audience is Indian. If our site is blocked, we are gone. I am a small player, everything we have built goes away in one shot,&rdquo; said Nikhil Pahwa, founder and editor of Medianama, a digital business news site. <br /><br />The penalty under this law are of two kinds. Under the civil penalty, the intermediary could be sued for damage by compensation up to Rs 5 crore per contravention. The criminal penalty is imprisonment for three years to life imprisonment for the top management of the intermediary if it is a company. There are no exceptions to the due diligence. <br /><br />The law can be a potential threat to online businesses. Players in this space believe that the guidelines are very broad and vague and there is no apparent recourse. &ldquo;Why is the draft obsessed with bloggers, I don&rsquo;t know. The rules are so vast that they cause annoyance. Who defines that the content is objectionable?,&rdquo; asks Shivam Vij who is a regular contributor to Kafila, a blog that comments on media and politics. <br /><br />Blogs in India are slowly gaining traction. According to the Vizisense, an online audience measurement site, Indian blogs attracted traffic close to 31 million unique users in January.<br /><br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680497525dafd-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680497525dafd-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680497525dafd-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680497525dafd-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680497525dafd-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680497525dafd-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680497525dafd-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680497525dafd-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680497525dafd-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 6403,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Bloggers call content regulation a gag on freedom by Srividya Iyer&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
A proposed government move to regulate content on blogs has ignited a firestorm of protest from the blogging community which is accusing the government of restricting free speech and acting like the guardians of a police state. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the heart of the issue is the Indian IT Act which was amended in 2008 to incorporate the much-needed changes to clarify the legal position of intermediaries or those who provide web-hosting services, internet service providers and online auction sites. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, the term intermediaries, for some reason, was also broadened to include blogs, though they neither provide the same kind of services like the ISPs nor have large-scale commercial interests. The law stated that the government should clarify the rules under which the intermediaries should function and the list of prohibitions applicable to them. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The list was published sometime last month and comments were invited from members of the public, bloggers and other members of the intermediaries group. &amp;lsquo;Intermediaries&amp;rsquo; include web hosting providers which would include companies like Amazon , cyber-cafes, payment sites like Paypal , online auction sites, internet service providers like BSNL , Airtel etc. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Blogs also fall in this category as networked service providers. The due diligence specifies that the intermediaries should not display, upload, modify or publish any information that is &amp;lsquo;harmful&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;threatening&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;abusive&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;harassing&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;blasphemous&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;objectionable&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;defamatory&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;vulgar&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;obscene&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;pornographic&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;paedophilic&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;libellous&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;invasive of another&amp;rsquo;s privacy&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;hateful&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;disparaging&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;racially , ethnically or otherwise objectionable, &amp;lsquo;relating to money laundering or gambling&amp;rsquo;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;It&amp;rsquo;s a fundamentally flawed exercise. One has to keep in mind the nuanced role of bloggers. The government needs to understand the power of the blogging community,&amp;rdquo; said Pavan Duggal , senior advocate, Supreme Court and cyber law expert. &amp;ldquo;The blogosphere has to align themselves to the changes in the norm,&amp;rdquo; he said. &amp;ldquo;But since the term &amp;lsquo;intermediaries&amp;rsquo; is vaguely and loosely used, the bloggers are right when they express agitation,&amp;rdquo; he added. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A senior government official defended the government&amp;rsquo;s response. &amp;ldquo;We are in the process of finalising it. We welcome positive feedback and constructive criticism. We might have made a mistake in understanding the public aspect. The public could have a different view point,&amp;rdquo; said a senior government official. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bloggers fear that the government will use these omnibus terms to charge the writers with almost anything. On Twitter , online users expressed their anger and frustration in equal measure. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;We cannot let the government to play the judge, jury and the executioner in this. Our entire audience is Indian. If our site is blocked, we are gone. I am a small player, everything we have built goes away in one shot,&amp;rdquo; said Nikhil Pahwa, founder and editor of Medianama, a digital business news site. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The penalty under this law are of two kinds. Under the civil penalty, the intermediary could be sued for damage by compensation up to Rs 5 crore per contravention. The criminal penalty is imprisonment for three years to life imprisonment for the top management of the intermediary if it is a company. There are no exceptions to the due diligence. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The law can be a potential threat to online businesses. Players in this space believe that the guidelines are very broad and vague and there is no apparent recourse. &amp;ldquo;Why is the draft obsessed with bloggers, I don&amp;rsquo;t know. The rules are so vast that they cause annoyance. Who defines that the content is objectionable?,&amp;rdquo; asks Shivam Vij who is a regular contributor to Kafila, a blog that comments on media and politics. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Blogs in India are slowly gaining traction. According to the Vizisense, an online audience measurement site, Indian blogs attracted traffic close to 31 million unique users in January.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Economic Times, 9 March, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/tech/internet/bloggers-call-content-regulation-a-gag-on-freedom/articleshow/7659593.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;bloggers-call-content-regulation-a-gag-on-freedom-by-srividya-iyer-6499&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6499,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6403,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Bloggers call content regulation a gag on freedom by Srividya Iyer&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Human Rights,media&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
A proposed government move to regulate content on blogs has ignited a firestorm of protest from the blogging community which is accusing the government of restricting free speech and acting like the guardians of a police state. 

At the heart...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;A proposed government move to regulate content on blogs has ignited a firestorm of protest from the blogging community which is accusing the government of restricting free speech and acting like the guardians of a police state. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;At the heart of the issue is the Indian IT Act which was amended in 2008 to incorporate the much-needed changes to clarify the legal position of intermediaries or those who provide web-hosting services, internet service providers and online auction sites. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, the term intermediaries, for some reason, was also broadened to include blogs, though they neither provide the same kind of services like the ISPs nor have large-scale commercial interests. The law stated that the government should clarify the rules under which the intermediaries should function and the list of prohibitions applicable to them. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The list was published sometime last month and comments were invited from members of the public, bloggers and other members of the intermediaries group. &amp;lsquo;Intermediaries&amp;rsquo; include web hosting providers which would include companies like Amazon , cyber-cafes, payment sites like Paypal , online auction sites, internet service providers like BSNL , Airtel etc. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Blogs also fall in this category as networked service providers. The due diligence specifies that the intermediaries should not display, upload, modify or publish any information that is &amp;lsquo;harmful&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;threatening&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;abusive&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;harassing&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;blasphemous&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;objectionable&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;defamatory&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;vulgar&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;obscene&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;pornographic&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;paedophilic&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;libellous&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;invasive of another&amp;rsquo;s privacy&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;hateful&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;disparaging&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;racially , ethnically or otherwise objectionable, &amp;lsquo;relating to money laundering or gambling&amp;rsquo;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;It&amp;rsquo;s a fundamentally flawed exercise. One has to keep in mind the nuanced role of bloggers. The government needs to understand the power of the blogging community,&amp;rdquo; said Pavan Duggal , senior advocate, Supreme Court and cyber law expert. &amp;ldquo;The blogosphere has to align themselves to the changes in the norm,&amp;rdquo; he said. &amp;ldquo;But since the term &amp;lsquo;intermediaries&amp;rsquo; is vaguely and loosely used, the bloggers are right when they express agitation,&amp;rdquo; he added. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A senior government official defended the government&amp;rsquo;s response. &amp;ldquo;We are in the process of finalising it. We welcome positive feedback and constructive criticism. We might have made a mistake in understanding the public aspect. The public could have a different view point,&amp;rdquo; said a senior government official. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Bloggers fear that the government will use these omnibus terms to charge the writers with almost anything. On Twitter , online users expressed their anger and frustration in equal measure. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;We cannot let the government to play the judge, jury and the executioner in this. Our entire audience is Indian. If our site is blocked, we are gone. I am a small player, everything we have built goes away in one shot,&amp;rdquo; said Nikhil Pahwa, founder and editor of Medianama, a digital business news site. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The penalty under this law are of two kinds. Under the civil penalty, the intermediary could be sued for damage by compensation up to Rs 5 crore per contravention. The criminal penalty is imprisonment for three years to life imprisonment for the top management of the intermediary if it is a company. There are no exceptions to the due diligence. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The law can be a potential threat to online businesses. Players in this space believe that the guidelines are very broad and vague and there is no apparent recourse. &amp;ldquo;Why is the draft obsessed with bloggers, I don&amp;rsquo;t know. The rules are so vast that they cause annoyance. Who defines that the content is objectionable?,&amp;rdquo; asks Shivam Vij who is a regular contributor to Kafila, a blog that comments on media and politics. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Blogs in India are slowly gaining traction. According to the Vizisense, an online audience measurement site, Indian blogs attracted traffic close to 31 million unique users in January.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 6403,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Bloggers call content regulation a gag on freedom by Srividya Iyer&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
A proposed government move to regulate content on blogs has ignited a firestorm of protest from the blogging community which is accusing the government of restricting free speech and acting like the guardians of a police state. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the heart of the issue is the Indian IT Act which was amended in 2008 to incorporate the much-needed changes to clarify the legal position of intermediaries or those who provide web-hosting services, internet service providers and online auction sites. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, the term intermediaries, for some reason, was also broadened to include blogs, though they neither provide the same kind of services like the ISPs nor have large-scale commercial interests. The law stated that the government should clarify the rules under which the intermediaries should function and the list of prohibitions applicable to them. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The list was published sometime last month and comments were invited from members of the public, bloggers and other members of the intermediaries group. &amp;lsquo;Intermediaries&amp;rsquo; include web hosting providers which would include companies like Amazon , cyber-cafes, payment sites like Paypal , online auction sites, internet service providers like BSNL , Airtel etc. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Blogs also fall in this category as networked service providers. The due diligence specifies that the intermediaries should not display, upload, modify or publish any information that is &amp;lsquo;harmful&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;threatening&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;abusive&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;harassing&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;blasphemous&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;objectionable&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;defamatory&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;vulgar&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;obscene&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;pornographic&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;paedophilic&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;libellous&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;invasive of another&amp;rsquo;s privacy&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;hateful&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;disparaging&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;racially , ethnically or otherwise objectionable, &amp;lsquo;relating to money laundering or gambling&amp;rsquo;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;It&amp;rsquo;s a fundamentally flawed exercise. One has to keep in mind the nuanced role of bloggers. The government needs to understand the power of the blogging community,&amp;rdquo; said Pavan Duggal , senior advocate, Supreme Court and cyber law expert. &amp;ldquo;The blogosphere has to align themselves to the changes in the norm,&amp;rdquo; he said. &amp;ldquo;But since the term &amp;lsquo;intermediaries&amp;rsquo; is vaguely and loosely used, the bloggers are right when they express agitation,&amp;rdquo; he added. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A senior government official defended the government&amp;rsquo;s response. &amp;ldquo;We are in the process of finalising it. We welcome positive feedback and constructive criticism. We might have made a mistake in understanding the public aspect. The public could have a different view point,&amp;rdquo; said a senior government official. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bloggers fear that the government will use these omnibus terms to charge the writers with almost anything. On Twitter , online users expressed their anger and frustration in equal measure. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;We cannot let the government to play the judge, jury and the executioner in this. Our entire audience is Indian. If our site is blocked, we are gone. I am a small player, everything we have built goes away in one shot,&amp;rdquo; said Nikhil Pahwa, founder and editor of Medianama, a digital business news site. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The penalty under this law are of two kinds. Under the civil penalty, the intermediary could be sued for damage by compensation up to Rs 5 crore per contravention. The criminal penalty is imprisonment for three years to life imprisonment for the top management of the intermediary if it is a company. There are no exceptions to the due diligence. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The law can be a potential threat to online businesses. Players in this space believe that the guidelines are very broad and vague and there is no apparent recourse. &amp;ldquo;Why is the draft obsessed with bloggers, I don&amp;rsquo;t know. The rules are so vast that they cause annoyance. Who defines that the content is objectionable?,&amp;rdquo; asks Shivam Vij who is a regular contributor to Kafila, a blog that comments on media and politics. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Blogs in India are slowly gaining traction. According to the Vizisense, an online audience measurement site, Indian blogs attracted traffic close to 31 million unique users in January.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Economic Times, 9 March, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/tech/internet/bloggers-call-content-regulation-a-gag-on-freedom/articleshow/7659593.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;bloggers-call-content-regulation-a-gag-on-freedom-by-srividya-iyer-6499&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 6499,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 6403
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Bloggers call content regulation a gag on freedom by Srividya Iyer&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Human Rights,media&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
A proposed government move to regulate content on blogs has ignited a firestorm of protest from the blogging community which is accusing the government of restricting free speech and acting like the guardians of a police state. 

At the heart...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;A proposed government move to regulate content on blogs has ignited a firestorm of protest from the blogging community which is accusing the government of restricting free speech and acting like the guardians of a police state. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;At the heart of the issue is the Indian IT Act which was amended in 2008 to incorporate the much-needed changes to clarify the legal position of intermediaries or those who provide web-hosting services, internet service providers and online auction sites. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, the term intermediaries, for some reason, was also broadened to include blogs, though they neither provide the same kind of services like the ISPs nor have large-scale commercial interests. The law stated that the government should clarify the rules under which the intermediaries should function and the list of prohibitions applicable to them. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The list was published sometime last month and comments were invited from members of the public, bloggers and other members of the intermediaries group. &amp;lsquo;Intermediaries&amp;rsquo; include web hosting providers which would include companies like Amazon , cyber-cafes, payment sites like Paypal , online auction sites, internet service providers like BSNL , Airtel etc. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Blogs also fall in this category as networked service providers. The due diligence specifies that the intermediaries should not display, upload, modify or publish any information that is &amp;lsquo;harmful&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;threatening&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;abusive&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;harassing&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;blasphemous&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;objectionable&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;defamatory&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;vulgar&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;obscene&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;pornographic&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;paedophilic&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;libellous&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;invasive of another&amp;rsquo;s privacy&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;hateful&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;disparaging&amp;rsquo;, &amp;lsquo;racially , ethnically or otherwise objectionable, &amp;lsquo;relating to money laundering or gambling&amp;rsquo;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;It&amp;rsquo;s a fundamentally flawed exercise. One has to keep in mind the nuanced role of bloggers. The government needs to understand the power of the blogging community,&amp;rdquo; said Pavan Duggal , senior advocate, Supreme Court and cyber law expert. &amp;ldquo;The blogosphere has to align themselves to the changes in the norm,&amp;rdquo; he said. &amp;ldquo;But since the term &amp;lsquo;intermediaries&amp;rsquo; is vaguely and loosely used, the bloggers are right when they express agitation,&amp;rdquo; he added. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A senior government official defended the government&amp;rsquo;s response. &amp;ldquo;We are in the process of finalising it. We welcome positive feedback and constructive criticism. We might have made a mistake in understanding the public aspect. The public could have a different view point,&amp;rdquo; said a senior government official. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Bloggers fear that the government will use these omnibus terms to charge the writers with almost anything. On Twitter , online users expressed their anger and frustration in equal measure. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;We cannot let the government to play the judge, jury and the executioner in this. Our entire audience is Indian. If our site is blocked, we are gone. I am a small player, everything we have built goes away in one shot,&amp;rdquo; said Nikhil Pahwa, founder and editor of Medianama, a digital business news site. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The penalty under this law are of two kinds. Under the civil penalty, the intermediary could be sued for damage by compensation up to Rs 5 crore per contravention. The criminal penalty is imprisonment for three years to life imprisonment for the top management of the intermediary if it is a company. There are no exceptions to the due diligence. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The law can be a potential threat to online businesses. Players in this space believe that the guidelines are very broad and vague and there is no apparent recourse. &amp;ldquo;Why is the draft obsessed with bloggers, I don&amp;rsquo;t know. The rules are so vast that they cause annoyance. Who defines that the content is objectionable?,&amp;rdquo; asks Shivam Vij who is a regular contributor to Kafila, a blog that comments on media and politics. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Blogs in India are slowly gaining traction. According to the Vizisense, an online audience measurement site, Indian blogs attracted traffic close to 31 million unique users in January.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/bloggers-call-content-regulation-a-gag-on-freedom-by-srividya-iyer-6499.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Bloggers call content regulation a gag on freedom by Srividya Iyer | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
A proposed government move to regulate content on blogs has ignited a firestorm of protest from the blogging community which is accusing the government of restricting free speech and acting like the guardians of a police state. 

At the heart..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Bloggers call content regulation a gag on freedom by Srividya Iyer</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">A proposed government move to regulate content on blogs has ignited a firestorm of protest from the blogging community which is accusing the government of restricting free speech and acting like the guardians of a police state. <br /><br />At the heart of the issue is the Indian IT Act which was amended in 2008 to incorporate the much-needed changes to clarify the legal position of intermediaries or those who provide web-hosting services, internet service providers and online auction sites. <br /><br />However, the term intermediaries, for some reason, was also broadened to include blogs, though they neither provide the same kind of services like the ISPs nor have large-scale commercial interests. The law stated that the government should clarify the rules under which the intermediaries should function and the list of prohibitions applicable to them. <br /><br />The list was published sometime last month and comments were invited from members of the public, bloggers and other members of the intermediaries group. &lsquo;Intermediaries&rsquo; include web hosting providers which would include companies like Amazon , cyber-cafes, payment sites like Paypal , online auction sites, internet service providers like BSNL , Airtel etc. <br /><br />Blogs also fall in this category as networked service providers. The due diligence specifies that the intermediaries should not display, upload, modify or publish any information that is &lsquo;harmful&rsquo;, &lsquo;threatening&rsquo;, &lsquo;abusive&rsquo;, &lsquo;harassing&rsquo;, &lsquo;blasphemous&rsquo;, &lsquo;objectionable&rsquo;, &lsquo;defamatory&rsquo;, &lsquo;vulgar&rsquo;, &lsquo;obscene&rsquo;, &lsquo;pornographic&rsquo;, &lsquo;paedophilic&rsquo;, &lsquo;libellous&rsquo;, &lsquo;invasive of another&rsquo;s privacy&rsquo;, &lsquo;hateful&rsquo;, &lsquo;disparaging&rsquo;, &lsquo;racially , ethnically or otherwise objectionable, &lsquo;relating to money laundering or gambling&rsquo;. <br /><br />&ldquo;It&rsquo;s a fundamentally flawed exercise. One has to keep in mind the nuanced role of bloggers. The government needs to understand the power of the blogging community,&rdquo; said Pavan Duggal , senior advocate, Supreme Court and cyber law expert. &ldquo;The blogosphere has to align themselves to the changes in the norm,&rdquo; he said. &ldquo;But since the term &lsquo;intermediaries&rsquo; is vaguely and loosely used, the bloggers are right when they express agitation,&rdquo; he added. <br /><br />A senior government official defended the government&rsquo;s response. &ldquo;We are in the process of finalising it. We welcome positive feedback and constructive criticism. We might have made a mistake in understanding the public aspect. The public could have a different view point,&rdquo; said a senior government official. <br /><br />Bloggers fear that the government will use these omnibus terms to charge the writers with almost anything. On Twitter , online users expressed their anger and frustration in equal measure. <br /><br />&ldquo;We cannot let the government to play the judge, jury and the executioner in this. Our entire audience is Indian. If our site is blocked, we are gone. I am a small player, everything we have built goes away in one shot,&rdquo; said Nikhil Pahwa, founder and editor of Medianama, a digital business news site. <br /><br />The penalty under this law are of two kinds. Under the civil penalty, the intermediary could be sued for damage by compensation up to Rs 5 crore per contravention. The criminal penalty is imprisonment for three years to life imprisonment for the top management of the intermediary if it is a company. There are no exceptions to the due diligence. <br /><br />The law can be a potential threat to online businesses. Players in this space believe that the guidelines are very broad and vague and there is no apparent recourse. &ldquo;Why is the draft obsessed with bloggers, I don&rsquo;t know. The rules are so vast that they cause annoyance. Who defines that the content is objectionable?,&rdquo; asks Shivam Vij who is a regular contributor to Kafila, a blog that comments on media and politics. <br /><br />Blogs in India are slowly gaining traction. According to the Vizisense, an online audience measurement site, Indian blogs attracted traffic close to 31 million unique users in January.<br /><br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 6403,
		'title' => 'Bloggers call content regulation a gag on freedom by Srividya Iyer',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<div align="justify">
A proposed government move to regulate content on blogs has ignited a firestorm of protest from the blogging community which is accusing the government of restricting free speech and acting like the guardians of a police state. <br />
<br />
At the heart of the issue is the Indian IT Act which was amended in 2008 to incorporate the much-needed changes to clarify the legal position of intermediaries or those who provide web-hosting services, internet service providers and online auction sites. <br />
<br />
However, the term intermediaries, for some reason, was also broadened to include blogs, though they neither provide the same kind of services like the ISPs nor have large-scale commercial interests. The law stated that the government should clarify the rules under which the intermediaries should function and the list of prohibitions applicable to them. <br />
<br />
The list was published sometime last month and comments were invited from members of the public, bloggers and other members of the intermediaries group. &lsquo;Intermediaries&rsquo; include web hosting providers which would include companies like Amazon , cyber-cafes, payment sites like Paypal , online auction sites, internet service providers like BSNL , Airtel etc. <br />
<br />
Blogs also fall in this category as networked service providers. The due diligence specifies that the intermediaries should not display, upload, modify or publish any information that is &lsquo;harmful&rsquo;, &lsquo;threatening&rsquo;, &lsquo;abusive&rsquo;, &lsquo;harassing&rsquo;, &lsquo;blasphemous&rsquo;, &lsquo;objectionable&rsquo;, &lsquo;defamatory&rsquo;, &lsquo;vulgar&rsquo;, &lsquo;obscene&rsquo;, &lsquo;pornographic&rsquo;, &lsquo;paedophilic&rsquo;, &lsquo;libellous&rsquo;, &lsquo;invasive of another&rsquo;s privacy&rsquo;, &lsquo;hateful&rsquo;, &lsquo;disparaging&rsquo;, &lsquo;racially , ethnically or otherwise objectionable, &lsquo;relating to money laundering or gambling&rsquo;. <br />
<br />
&ldquo;It&rsquo;s a fundamentally flawed exercise. One has to keep in mind the nuanced role of bloggers. The government needs to understand the power of the blogging community,&rdquo; said Pavan Duggal , senior advocate, Supreme Court and cyber law expert. &ldquo;The blogosphere has to align themselves to the changes in the norm,&rdquo; he said. &ldquo;But since the term &lsquo;intermediaries&rsquo; is vaguely and loosely used, the bloggers are right when they express agitation,&rdquo; he added. <br />
<br />
A senior government official defended the government&rsquo;s response. &ldquo;We are in the process of finalising it. We welcome positive feedback and constructive criticism. We might have made a mistake in understanding the public aspect. The public could have a different view point,&rdquo; said a senior government official. <br />
<br />
Bloggers fear that the government will use these omnibus terms to charge the writers with almost anything. On Twitter , online users expressed their anger and frustration in equal measure. <br />
<br />
&ldquo;We cannot let the government to play the judge, jury and the executioner in this. Our entire audience is Indian. If our site is blocked, we are gone. I am a small player, everything we have built goes away in one shot,&rdquo; said Nikhil Pahwa, founder and editor of Medianama, a digital business news site. <br />
<br />
The penalty under this law are of two kinds. Under the civil penalty, the intermediary could be sued for damage by compensation up to Rs 5 crore per contravention. The criminal penalty is imprisonment for three years to life imprisonment for the top management of the intermediary if it is a company. There are no exceptions to the due diligence. <br />
<br />
The law can be a potential threat to online businesses. Players in this space believe that the guidelines are very broad and vague and there is no apparent recourse. &ldquo;Why is the draft obsessed with bloggers, I don&rsquo;t know. The rules are so vast that they cause annoyance. Who defines that the content is objectionable?,&rdquo; asks Shivam Vij who is a regular contributor to Kafila, a blog that comments on media and politics. <br />
<br />
Blogs in India are slowly gaining traction. According to the Vizisense, an online audience measurement site, Indian blogs attracted traffic close to 31 million unique users in January.<br />
<br />
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 9 March, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/tech/internet/bloggers-call-content-regulation-a-gag-on-freedom/articleshow/7659593.cms',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'bloggers-call-content-regulation-a-gag-on-freedom-by-srividya-iyer-6499',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 6499,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 6403,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Bloggers call content regulation a gag on freedom by Srividya Iyer',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Human Rights,media',
	'metaDesc' => '
A proposed government move to regulate content on blogs has ignited a firestorm of protest from the blogging community which is accusing the government of restricting free speech and acting like the guardians of a police state. 

At the heart...',
	'disp' => '<div align="justify">A proposed government move to regulate content on blogs has ignited a firestorm of protest from the blogging community which is accusing the government of restricting free speech and acting like the guardians of a police state. <br /><br />At the heart of the issue is the Indian IT Act which was amended in 2008 to incorporate the much-needed changes to clarify the legal position of intermediaries or those who provide web-hosting services, internet service providers and online auction sites. <br /><br />However, the term intermediaries, for some reason, was also broadened to include blogs, though they neither provide the same kind of services like the ISPs nor have large-scale commercial interests. The law stated that the government should clarify the rules under which the intermediaries should function and the list of prohibitions applicable to them. <br /><br />The list was published sometime last month and comments were invited from members of the public, bloggers and other members of the intermediaries group. &lsquo;Intermediaries&rsquo; include web hosting providers which would include companies like Amazon , cyber-cafes, payment sites like Paypal , online auction sites, internet service providers like BSNL , Airtel etc. <br /><br />Blogs also fall in this category as networked service providers. The due diligence specifies that the intermediaries should not display, upload, modify or publish any information that is &lsquo;harmful&rsquo;, &lsquo;threatening&rsquo;, &lsquo;abusive&rsquo;, &lsquo;harassing&rsquo;, &lsquo;blasphemous&rsquo;, &lsquo;objectionable&rsquo;, &lsquo;defamatory&rsquo;, &lsquo;vulgar&rsquo;, &lsquo;obscene&rsquo;, &lsquo;pornographic&rsquo;, &lsquo;paedophilic&rsquo;, &lsquo;libellous&rsquo;, &lsquo;invasive of another&rsquo;s privacy&rsquo;, &lsquo;hateful&rsquo;, &lsquo;disparaging&rsquo;, &lsquo;racially , ethnically or otherwise objectionable, &lsquo;relating to money laundering or gambling&rsquo;. <br /><br />&ldquo;It&rsquo;s a fundamentally flawed exercise. One has to keep in mind the nuanced role of bloggers. The government needs to understand the power of the blogging community,&rdquo; said Pavan Duggal , senior advocate, Supreme Court and cyber law expert. &ldquo;The blogosphere has to align themselves to the changes in the norm,&rdquo; he said. &ldquo;But since the term &lsquo;intermediaries&rsquo; is vaguely and loosely used, the bloggers are right when they express agitation,&rdquo; he added. <br /><br />A senior government official defended the government&rsquo;s response. &ldquo;We are in the process of finalising it. We welcome positive feedback and constructive criticism. We might have made a mistake in understanding the public aspect. The public could have a different view point,&rdquo; said a senior government official. <br /><br />Bloggers fear that the government will use these omnibus terms to charge the writers with almost anything. On Twitter , online users expressed their anger and frustration in equal measure. <br /><br />&ldquo;We cannot let the government to play the judge, jury and the executioner in this. Our entire audience is Indian. If our site is blocked, we are gone. I am a small player, everything we have built goes away in one shot,&rdquo; said Nikhil Pahwa, founder and editor of Medianama, a digital business news site. <br /><br />The penalty under this law are of two kinds. Under the civil penalty, the intermediary could be sued for damage by compensation up to Rs 5 crore per contravention. The criminal penalty is imprisonment for three years to life imprisonment for the top management of the intermediary if it is a company. There are no exceptions to the due diligence. <br /><br />The law can be a potential threat to online businesses. Players in this space believe that the guidelines are very broad and vague and there is no apparent recourse. &ldquo;Why is the draft obsessed with bloggers, I don&rsquo;t know. The rules are so vast that they cause annoyance. Who defines that the content is objectionable?,&rdquo; asks Shivam Vij who is a regular contributor to Kafila, a blog that comments on media and politics. <br /><br />Blogs in India are slowly gaining traction. According to the Vizisense, an online audience measurement site, Indian blogs attracted traffic close to 31 million unique users in January.<br /><br /></div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 6403,
	'title' => 'Bloggers call content regulation a gag on freedom by Srividya Iyer',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<div align="justify">
A proposed government move to regulate content on blogs has ignited a firestorm of protest from the blogging community which is accusing the government of restricting free speech and acting like the guardians of a police state. <br />
<br />
At the heart of the issue is the Indian IT Act which was amended in 2008 to incorporate the much-needed changes to clarify the legal position of intermediaries or those who provide web-hosting services, internet service providers and online auction sites. <br />
<br />
However, the term intermediaries, for some reason, was also broadened to include blogs, though they neither provide the same kind of services like the ISPs nor have large-scale commercial interests. The law stated that the government should clarify the rules under which the intermediaries should function and the list of prohibitions applicable to them. <br />
<br />
The list was published sometime last month and comments were invited from members of the public, bloggers and other members of the intermediaries group. &lsquo;Intermediaries&rsquo; include web hosting providers which would include companies like Amazon , cyber-cafes, payment sites like Paypal , online auction sites, internet service providers like BSNL , Airtel etc. <br />
<br />
Blogs also fall in this category as networked service providers. The due diligence specifies that the intermediaries should not display, upload, modify or publish any information that is &lsquo;harmful&rsquo;, &lsquo;threatening&rsquo;, &lsquo;abusive&rsquo;, &lsquo;harassing&rsquo;, &lsquo;blasphemous&rsquo;, &lsquo;objectionable&rsquo;, &lsquo;defamatory&rsquo;, &lsquo;vulgar&rsquo;, &lsquo;obscene&rsquo;, &lsquo;pornographic&rsquo;, &lsquo;paedophilic&rsquo;, &lsquo;libellous&rsquo;, &lsquo;invasive of another&rsquo;s privacy&rsquo;, &lsquo;hateful&rsquo;, &lsquo;disparaging&rsquo;, &lsquo;racially , ethnically or otherwise objectionable, &lsquo;relating to money laundering or gambling&rsquo;. <br />
<br />
&ldquo;It&rsquo;s a fundamentally flawed exercise. One has to keep in mind the nuanced role of bloggers. The government needs to understand the power of the blogging community,&rdquo; said Pavan Duggal , senior advocate, Supreme Court and cyber law expert. &ldquo;The blogosphere has to align themselves to the changes in the norm,&rdquo; he said. &ldquo;But since the term &lsquo;intermediaries&rsquo; is vaguely and loosely used, the bloggers are right when they express agitation,&rdquo; he added. <br />
<br />
A senior government official defended the government&rsquo;s response. &ldquo;We are in the process of finalising it. We welcome positive feedback and constructive criticism. We might have made a mistake in understanding the public aspect. The public could have a different view point,&rdquo; said a senior government official. <br />
<br />
Bloggers fear that the government will use these omnibus terms to charge the writers with almost anything. On Twitter , online users expressed their anger and frustration in equal measure. <br />
<br />
&ldquo;We cannot let the government to play the judge, jury and the executioner in this. Our entire audience is Indian. If our site is blocked, we are gone. I am a small player, everything we have built goes away in one shot,&rdquo; said Nikhil Pahwa, founder and editor of Medianama, a digital business news site. <br />
<br />
The penalty under this law are of two kinds. Under the civil penalty, the intermediary could be sued for damage by compensation up to Rs 5 crore per contravention. The criminal penalty is imprisonment for three years to life imprisonment for the top management of the intermediary if it is a company. There are no exceptions to the due diligence. <br />
<br />
The law can be a potential threat to online businesses. Players in this space believe that the guidelines are very broad and vague and there is no apparent recourse. &ldquo;Why is the draft obsessed with bloggers, I don&rsquo;t know. The rules are so vast that they cause annoyance. Who defines that the content is objectionable?,&rdquo; asks Shivam Vij who is a regular contributor to Kafila, a blog that comments on media and politics. <br />
<br />
Blogs in India are slowly gaining traction. According to the Vizisense, an online audience measurement site, Indian blogs attracted traffic close to 31 million unique users in January.<br />
<br />
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 9 March, 2011, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/tech/internet/bloggers-call-content-regulation-a-gag-on-freedom/articleshow/7659593.cms',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'bloggers-call-content-regulation-a-gag-on-freedom-by-srividya-iyer-6499',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 6499,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 6403
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Bloggers call content regulation a gag on freedom by Srividya Iyer'
$metaKeywords = 'Human Rights,media'
$metaDesc = '
A proposed government move to regulate content on blogs has ignited a firestorm of protest from the blogging community which is accusing the government of restricting free speech and acting like the guardians of a police state. 

At the heart...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">A proposed government move to regulate content on blogs has ignited a firestorm of protest from the blogging community which is accusing the government of restricting free speech and acting like the guardians of a police state. <br /><br />At the heart of the issue is the Indian IT Act which was amended in 2008 to incorporate the much-needed changes to clarify the legal position of intermediaries or those who provide web-hosting services, internet service providers and online auction sites. <br /><br />However, the term intermediaries, for some reason, was also broadened to include blogs, though they neither provide the same kind of services like the ISPs nor have large-scale commercial interests. The law stated that the government should clarify the rules under which the intermediaries should function and the list of prohibitions applicable to them. <br /><br />The list was published sometime last month and comments were invited from members of the public, bloggers and other members of the intermediaries group. &lsquo;Intermediaries&rsquo; include web hosting providers which would include companies like Amazon , cyber-cafes, payment sites like Paypal , online auction sites, internet service providers like BSNL , Airtel etc. <br /><br />Blogs also fall in this category as networked service providers. The due diligence specifies that the intermediaries should not display, upload, modify or publish any information that is &lsquo;harmful&rsquo;, &lsquo;threatening&rsquo;, &lsquo;abusive&rsquo;, &lsquo;harassing&rsquo;, &lsquo;blasphemous&rsquo;, &lsquo;objectionable&rsquo;, &lsquo;defamatory&rsquo;, &lsquo;vulgar&rsquo;, &lsquo;obscene&rsquo;, &lsquo;pornographic&rsquo;, &lsquo;paedophilic&rsquo;, &lsquo;libellous&rsquo;, &lsquo;invasive of another&rsquo;s privacy&rsquo;, &lsquo;hateful&rsquo;, &lsquo;disparaging&rsquo;, &lsquo;racially , ethnically or otherwise objectionable, &lsquo;relating to money laundering or gambling&rsquo;. <br /><br />&ldquo;It&rsquo;s a fundamentally flawed exercise. One has to keep in mind the nuanced role of bloggers. The government needs to understand the power of the blogging community,&rdquo; said Pavan Duggal , senior advocate, Supreme Court and cyber law expert. &ldquo;The blogosphere has to align themselves to the changes in the norm,&rdquo; he said. &ldquo;But since the term &lsquo;intermediaries&rsquo; is vaguely and loosely used, the bloggers are right when they express agitation,&rdquo; he added. <br /><br />A senior government official defended the government&rsquo;s response. &ldquo;We are in the process of finalising it. We welcome positive feedback and constructive criticism. We might have made a mistake in understanding the public aspect. The public could have a different view point,&rdquo; said a senior government official. <br /><br />Bloggers fear that the government will use these omnibus terms to charge the writers with almost anything. On Twitter , online users expressed their anger and frustration in equal measure. <br /><br />&ldquo;We cannot let the government to play the judge, jury and the executioner in this. Our entire audience is Indian. If our site is blocked, we are gone. I am a small player, everything we have built goes away in one shot,&rdquo; said Nikhil Pahwa, founder and editor of Medianama, a digital business news site. <br /><br />The penalty under this law are of two kinds. Under the civil penalty, the intermediary could be sued for damage by compensation up to Rs 5 crore per contravention. The criminal penalty is imprisonment for three years to life imprisonment for the top management of the intermediary if it is a company. There are no exceptions to the due diligence. <br /><br />The law can be a potential threat to online businesses. Players in this space believe that the guidelines are very broad and vague and there is no apparent recourse. &ldquo;Why is the draft obsessed with bloggers, I don&rsquo;t know. The rules are so vast that they cause annoyance. Who defines that the content is objectionable?,&rdquo; asks Shivam Vij who is a regular contributor to Kafila, a blog that comments on media and politics. <br /><br />Blogs in India are slowly gaining traction. According to the Vizisense, an online audience measurement site, Indian blogs attracted traffic close to 31 million unique users in January.<br /><br /></div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

Bloggers call content regulation a gag on freedom by Srividya Iyer

A proposed government move to regulate content on blogs has ignited a firestorm of protest from the blogging community which is accusing the government of restricting free speech and acting like the guardians of a police state. At the heart of the issue is the Indian IT Act which was amended in 2008 to incorporate the much-needed changes to clarify the legal position of intermediaries or those who provide web-hosting services, internet service providers and online auction sites. However, the term intermediaries, for some reason, was also broadened to include blogs, though they neither provide the same kind of services like the ISPs nor have large-scale commercial interests. The law stated that the government should clarify the rules under which the intermediaries should function and the list of prohibitions applicable to them. The list was published sometime last month and comments were invited from members of the public, bloggers and other members of the intermediaries group. ‘Intermediaries’ include web hosting providers which would include companies like Amazon , cyber-cafes, payment sites like Paypal , online auction sites, internet service providers like BSNL , Airtel etc. Blogs also fall in this category as networked service providers. The due diligence specifies that the intermediaries should not display, upload, modify or publish any information that is ‘harmful’, ‘threatening’, ‘abusive’, ‘harassing’, ‘blasphemous’, ‘objectionable’, ‘defamatory’, ‘vulgar’, ‘obscene’, ‘pornographic’, ‘paedophilic’, ‘libellous’, ‘invasive of another’s privacy’, ‘hateful’, ‘disparaging’, ‘racially , ethnically or otherwise objectionable, ‘relating to money laundering or gambling’. “It’s a fundamentally flawed exercise. One has to keep in mind the nuanced role of bloggers. The government needs to understand the power of the blogging community,” said Pavan Duggal , senior advocate, Supreme Court and cyber law expert. “The blogosphere has to align themselves to the changes in the norm,” he said. “But since the term ‘intermediaries’ is vaguely and loosely used, the bloggers are right when they express agitation,” he added. A senior government official defended the government’s response. “We are in the process of finalising it. We welcome positive feedback and constructive criticism. We might have made a mistake in understanding the public aspect. The public could have a different view point,” said a senior government official. Bloggers fear that the government will use these omnibus terms to charge the writers with almost anything. On Twitter , online users expressed their anger and frustration in equal measure. “We cannot let the government to play the judge, jury and the executioner in this. Our entire audience is Indian. If our site is blocked, we are gone. I am a small player, everything we have built goes away in one shot,” said Nikhil Pahwa, founder and editor of Medianama, a digital business news site. The penalty under this law are of two kinds. Under the civil penalty, the intermediary could be sued for damage by compensation up to Rs 5 crore per contravention. The criminal penalty is imprisonment for three years to life imprisonment for the top management of the intermediary if it is a company. There are no exceptions to the due diligence. The law can be a potential threat to online businesses. Players in this space believe that the guidelines are very broad and vague and there is no apparent recourse. “Why is the draft obsessed with bloggers, I don’t know. The rules are so vast that they cause annoyance. Who defines that the content is objectionable?,” asks Shivam Vij who is a regular contributor to Kafila, a blog that comments on media and politics. Blogs in India are slowly gaining traction. According to the Vizisense, an online audience measurement site, Indian blogs attracted traffic close to 31 million unique users in January.