Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/bombay-hc-stays-env-mins-direction-to-lavasa-to-stop-construction-4717/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/bombay-hc-stays-env-mins-direction-to-lavasa-to-stop-construction-4717/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/bombay-hc-stays-env-mins-direction-to-lavasa-to-stop-construction-4717/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/bombay-hc-stays-env-mins-direction-to-lavasa-to-stop-construction-4717/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5ed9592552-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5ed9592552-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f5ed9592552-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5ed9592552-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5ed9592552-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5ed9592552-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5ed9592552-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f5ed9592552-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f5ed9592552-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 4626, 'title' => 'Bombay HC stays Env Min's direction to Lavasa to stop construction', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <br /> The Bombay High Court on Tuesday stayed Environment Ministry's direction to Lavasa Corporation to stop construction. However, Lavasa Corporation voluntarily agreed not to carry out any work till December 14. </p> <p align="justify"> On November 25, MOEF issued a show-cause notice to Lavasa, demanding an explanation as to why it did not obtain clearances as per rules under Environment Protection Act, amended by notifications in 1994 and 2004. </p> <p align="justify"> MOEF also asked the corporation, which is developing a hill station across 5000 hectares in Mulshi taluka of Pune district, to stop the ongoing constructions. </p> <p align="justify"> Lavasa's lawyer, senior counsel Shekhar Nafade, argued that company has invested Rs 6,000 crore in the project, and MOEF's issuing of notice without giving hearing was a &quot;high-handed&quot; action. </p> <p align="justify"> Advocate Nafade said that construction at Lavasa began in 2004, but MOEF issued notice only last month. &quot;When we asked the state government, it told us that environmental clearances were not necessary because it was a tourism project,&quot; he said. </p> <p align="justify"> Nafade alleged that notice came to be issued only after some social activists, represented by National Alliance of People's Movements, made a complaint to the environment minister. &quot;This is a case of appeasing political activists,&quot; he said. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;What about public sector banks? (who have lent loans for the project),&quot; he asked. </p> <p align="justify"> The division bench too asked Additional Solicitor General Darius Khambata why MOEF was late in sending the notice. </p> <p align="justify"> Khambata said that when MOEF came to know about alleged violations was not the issue, but &quot;when did they (Lavasa) know (that clearances were necessary)&quot; was the issue. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;They brazenly went on with the construction, though admittedly they had no environmental clearance,&quot; he said. </p> <p align="justify"> The burden to prove that project was not harming the environment was on Lavasa, he added. </p> <p align="justify"> Further, Khambata said that MOEF was ready to give hearing to Lavasa at the earliest, and would pass order before December 31. </p> <p align="justify"> Meanwhile, Alliance of People's Movements, which has already filed a PIL against Lavasa, today demanded that it be allowed to intervene in Lavasa's petition. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;The court has now clubbed the PIL with Lavasa's case,&quot; said APM's lawyer advocate Y P Singh. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Business Standard, 7 December, 2010, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/news-by-industry/services/property-/-cstruction/Bombay-HC-stays-Env-Mins-direction-to-Lavasa-to-stop-construction/arti', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'bombay-hc-stays-env-mins-direction-to-lavasa-to-stop-construction-4717', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4717, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 4626, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Bombay HC stays Env Min's direction to Lavasa to stop construction', 'metaKeywords' => 'Environment', 'metaDesc' => ' The Bombay High Court on Tuesday stayed Environment Ministry's direction to Lavasa Corporation to stop construction. However, Lavasa Corporation voluntarily agreed not to carry out any work till December 14. On November 25, MOEF issued a show-cause notice to Lavasa,...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><br />The Bombay High Court on Tuesday stayed Environment Ministry's direction to Lavasa Corporation to stop construction. However, Lavasa Corporation voluntarily agreed not to carry out any work till December 14. </p><p align="justify">On November 25, MOEF issued a show-cause notice to Lavasa, demanding an explanation as to why it did not obtain clearances as per rules under Environment Protection Act, amended by notifications in 1994 and 2004. </p><p align="justify">MOEF also asked the corporation, which is developing a hill station across 5000 hectares in Mulshi taluka of Pune district, to stop the ongoing constructions. </p><p align="justify">Lavasa's lawyer, senior counsel Shekhar Nafade, argued that company has invested Rs 6,000 crore in the project, and MOEF's issuing of notice without giving hearing was a &quot;high-handed&quot; action. </p><p align="justify">Advocate Nafade said that construction at Lavasa began in 2004, but MOEF issued notice only last month. &quot;When we asked the state government, it told us that environmental clearances were not necessary because it was a tourism project,&quot; he said. </p><p align="justify">Nafade alleged that notice came to be issued only after some social activists, represented by National Alliance of People's Movements, made a complaint to the environment minister. &quot;This is a case of appeasing political activists,&quot; he said. </p><p align="justify">&quot;What about public sector banks? (who have lent loans for the project),&quot; he asked. </p><p align="justify">The division bench too asked Additional Solicitor General Darius Khambata why MOEF was late in sending the notice. </p><p align="justify">Khambata said that when MOEF came to know about alleged violations was not the issue, but &quot;when did they (Lavasa) know (that clearances were necessary)&quot; was the issue. </p><p align="justify">&quot;They brazenly went on with the construction, though admittedly they had no environmental clearance,&quot; he said. </p><p align="justify">The burden to prove that project was not harming the environment was on Lavasa, he added. </p><p align="justify">Further, Khambata said that MOEF was ready to give hearing to Lavasa at the earliest, and would pass order before December 31. </p><p align="justify">Meanwhile, Alliance of People's Movements, which has already filed a PIL against Lavasa, today demanded that it be allowed to intervene in Lavasa's petition. </p><p align="justify">&quot;The court has now clubbed the PIL with Lavasa's case,&quot; said APM's lawyer advocate Y P Singh. </p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 4626, 'title' => 'Bombay HC stays Env Min's direction to Lavasa to stop construction', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <br /> The Bombay High Court on Tuesday stayed Environment Ministry's direction to Lavasa Corporation to stop construction. However, Lavasa Corporation voluntarily agreed not to carry out any work till December 14. </p> <p align="justify"> On November 25, MOEF issued a show-cause notice to Lavasa, demanding an explanation as to why it did not obtain clearances as per rules under Environment Protection Act, amended by notifications in 1994 and 2004. </p> <p align="justify"> MOEF also asked the corporation, which is developing a hill station across 5000 hectares in Mulshi taluka of Pune district, to stop the ongoing constructions. </p> <p align="justify"> Lavasa's lawyer, senior counsel Shekhar Nafade, argued that company has invested Rs 6,000 crore in the project, and MOEF's issuing of notice without giving hearing was a &quot;high-handed&quot; action. </p> <p align="justify"> Advocate Nafade said that construction at Lavasa began in 2004, but MOEF issued notice only last month. &quot;When we asked the state government, it told us that environmental clearances were not necessary because it was a tourism project,&quot; he said. </p> <p align="justify"> Nafade alleged that notice came to be issued only after some social activists, represented by National Alliance of People's Movements, made a complaint to the environment minister. &quot;This is a case of appeasing political activists,&quot; he said. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;What about public sector banks? (who have lent loans for the project),&quot; he asked. </p> <p align="justify"> The division bench too asked Additional Solicitor General Darius Khambata why MOEF was late in sending the notice. </p> <p align="justify"> Khambata said that when MOEF came to know about alleged violations was not the issue, but &quot;when did they (Lavasa) know (that clearances were necessary)&quot; was the issue. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;They brazenly went on with the construction, though admittedly they had no environmental clearance,&quot; he said. </p> <p align="justify"> The burden to prove that project was not harming the environment was on Lavasa, he added. </p> <p align="justify"> Further, Khambata said that MOEF was ready to give hearing to Lavasa at the earliest, and would pass order before December 31. </p> <p align="justify"> Meanwhile, Alliance of People's Movements, which has already filed a PIL against Lavasa, today demanded that it be allowed to intervene in Lavasa's petition. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;The court has now clubbed the PIL with Lavasa's case,&quot; said APM's lawyer advocate Y P Singh. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Business Standard, 7 December, 2010, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/news-by-industry/services/property-/-cstruction/Bombay-HC-stays-Env-Mins-direction-to-Lavasa-to-stop-construction/arti', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'bombay-hc-stays-env-mins-direction-to-lavasa-to-stop-construction-4717', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4717, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 4626 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Bombay HC stays Env Min's direction to Lavasa to stop construction' $metaKeywords = 'Environment' $metaDesc = ' The Bombay High Court on Tuesday stayed Environment Ministry's direction to Lavasa Corporation to stop construction. However, Lavasa Corporation voluntarily agreed not to carry out any work till December 14. On November 25, MOEF issued a show-cause notice to Lavasa,...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><br />The Bombay High Court on Tuesday stayed Environment Ministry's direction to Lavasa Corporation to stop construction. However, Lavasa Corporation voluntarily agreed not to carry out any work till December 14. </p><p align="justify">On November 25, MOEF issued a show-cause notice to Lavasa, demanding an explanation as to why it did not obtain clearances as per rules under Environment Protection Act, amended by notifications in 1994 and 2004. </p><p align="justify">MOEF also asked the corporation, which is developing a hill station across 5000 hectares in Mulshi taluka of Pune district, to stop the ongoing constructions. </p><p align="justify">Lavasa's lawyer, senior counsel Shekhar Nafade, argued that company has invested Rs 6,000 crore in the project, and MOEF's issuing of notice without giving hearing was a &quot;high-handed&quot; action. </p><p align="justify">Advocate Nafade said that construction at Lavasa began in 2004, but MOEF issued notice only last month. &quot;When we asked the state government, it told us that environmental clearances were not necessary because it was a tourism project,&quot; he said. </p><p align="justify">Nafade alleged that notice came to be issued only after some social activists, represented by National Alliance of People's Movements, made a complaint to the environment minister. &quot;This is a case of appeasing political activists,&quot; he said. </p><p align="justify">&quot;What about public sector banks? (who have lent loans for the project),&quot; he asked. </p><p align="justify">The division bench too asked Additional Solicitor General Darius Khambata why MOEF was late in sending the notice. </p><p align="justify">Khambata said that when MOEF came to know about alleged violations was not the issue, but &quot;when did they (Lavasa) know (that clearances were necessary)&quot; was the issue. </p><p align="justify">&quot;They brazenly went on with the construction, though admittedly they had no environmental clearance,&quot; he said. </p><p align="justify">The burden to prove that project was not harming the environment was on Lavasa, he added. </p><p align="justify">Further, Khambata said that MOEF was ready to give hearing to Lavasa at the earliest, and would pass order before December 31. </p><p align="justify">Meanwhile, Alliance of People's Movements, which has already filed a PIL against Lavasa, today demanded that it be allowed to intervene in Lavasa's petition. </p><p align="justify">&quot;The court has now clubbed the PIL with Lavasa's case,&quot; said APM's lawyer advocate Y P Singh. </p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/bombay-hc-stays-env-mins-direction-to-lavasa-to-stop-construction-4717.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Bombay HC stays Env Min's direction to Lavasa to stop construction | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" The Bombay High Court on Tuesday stayed Environment Ministry's direction to Lavasa Corporation to stop construction. However, Lavasa Corporation voluntarily agreed not to carry out any work till December 14. On November 25, MOEF issued a show-cause notice to Lavasa,..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Bombay HC stays Env Min's direction to Lavasa to stop construction</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p align="justify"><br />The Bombay High Court on Tuesday stayed Environment Ministry's direction to Lavasa Corporation to stop construction. However, Lavasa Corporation voluntarily agreed not to carry out any work till December 14. </p><p align="justify">On November 25, MOEF issued a show-cause notice to Lavasa, demanding an explanation as to why it did not obtain clearances as per rules under Environment Protection Act, amended by notifications in 1994 and 2004. </p><p align="justify">MOEF also asked the corporation, which is developing a hill station across 5000 hectares in Mulshi taluka of Pune district, to stop the ongoing constructions. </p><p align="justify">Lavasa's lawyer, senior counsel Shekhar Nafade, argued that company has invested Rs 6,000 crore in the project, and MOEF's issuing of notice without giving hearing was a "high-handed" action. </p><p align="justify">Advocate Nafade said that construction at Lavasa began in 2004, but MOEF issued notice only last month. "When we asked the state government, it told us that environmental clearances were not necessary because it was a tourism project," he said. </p><p align="justify">Nafade alleged that notice came to be issued only after some social activists, represented by National Alliance of People's Movements, made a complaint to the environment minister. "This is a case of appeasing political activists," he said. </p><p align="justify">"What about public sector banks? (who have lent loans for the project)," he asked. </p><p align="justify">The division bench too asked Additional Solicitor General Darius Khambata why MOEF was late in sending the notice. </p><p align="justify">Khambata said that when MOEF came to know about alleged violations was not the issue, but "when did they (Lavasa) know (that clearances were necessary)" was the issue. </p><p align="justify">"They brazenly went on with the construction, though admittedly they had no environmental clearance," he said. </p><p align="justify">The burden to prove that project was not harming the environment was on Lavasa, he added. </p><p align="justify">Further, Khambata said that MOEF was ready to give hearing to Lavasa at the earliest, and would pass order before December 31. </p><p align="justify">Meanwhile, Alliance of People's Movements, which has already filed a PIL against Lavasa, today demanded that it be allowed to intervene in Lavasa's petition. </p><p align="justify">"The court has now clubbed the PIL with Lavasa's case," said APM's lawyer advocate Y P Singh. </p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5ed9592552-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5ed9592552-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f5ed9592552-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5ed9592552-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5ed9592552-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5ed9592552-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5ed9592552-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f5ed9592552-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f5ed9592552-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 4626, 'title' => 'Bombay HC stays Env Min's direction to Lavasa to stop construction', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <br /> The Bombay High Court on Tuesday stayed Environment Ministry's direction to Lavasa Corporation to stop construction. However, Lavasa Corporation voluntarily agreed not to carry out any work till December 14. </p> <p align="justify"> On November 25, MOEF issued a show-cause notice to Lavasa, demanding an explanation as to why it did not obtain clearances as per rules under Environment Protection Act, amended by notifications in 1994 and 2004. </p> <p align="justify"> MOEF also asked the corporation, which is developing a hill station across 5000 hectares in Mulshi taluka of Pune district, to stop the ongoing constructions. </p> <p align="justify"> Lavasa's lawyer, senior counsel Shekhar Nafade, argued that company has invested Rs 6,000 crore in the project, and MOEF's issuing of notice without giving hearing was a &quot;high-handed&quot; action. </p> <p align="justify"> Advocate Nafade said that construction at Lavasa began in 2004, but MOEF issued notice only last month. &quot;When we asked the state government, it told us that environmental clearances were not necessary because it was a tourism project,&quot; he said. </p> <p align="justify"> Nafade alleged that notice came to be issued only after some social activists, represented by National Alliance of People's Movements, made a complaint to the environment minister. &quot;This is a case of appeasing political activists,&quot; he said. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;What about public sector banks? (who have lent loans for the project),&quot; he asked. </p> <p align="justify"> The division bench too asked Additional Solicitor General Darius Khambata why MOEF was late in sending the notice. </p> <p align="justify"> Khambata said that when MOEF came to know about alleged violations was not the issue, but &quot;when did they (Lavasa) know (that clearances were necessary)&quot; was the issue. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;They brazenly went on with the construction, though admittedly they had no environmental clearance,&quot; he said. </p> <p align="justify"> The burden to prove that project was not harming the environment was on Lavasa, he added. </p> <p align="justify"> Further, Khambata said that MOEF was ready to give hearing to Lavasa at the earliest, and would pass order before December 31. </p> <p align="justify"> Meanwhile, Alliance of People's Movements, which has already filed a PIL against Lavasa, today demanded that it be allowed to intervene in Lavasa's petition. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;The court has now clubbed the PIL with Lavasa's case,&quot; said APM's lawyer advocate Y P Singh. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Business Standard, 7 December, 2010, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/news-by-industry/services/property-/-cstruction/Bombay-HC-stays-Env-Mins-direction-to-Lavasa-to-stop-construction/arti', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'bombay-hc-stays-env-mins-direction-to-lavasa-to-stop-construction-4717', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4717, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 4626, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Bombay HC stays Env Min's direction to Lavasa to stop construction', 'metaKeywords' => 'Environment', 'metaDesc' => ' The Bombay High Court on Tuesday stayed Environment Ministry's direction to Lavasa Corporation to stop construction. However, Lavasa Corporation voluntarily agreed not to carry out any work till December 14. On November 25, MOEF issued a show-cause notice to Lavasa,...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><br />The Bombay High Court on Tuesday stayed Environment Ministry's direction to Lavasa Corporation to stop construction. However, Lavasa Corporation voluntarily agreed not to carry out any work till December 14. </p><p align="justify">On November 25, MOEF issued a show-cause notice to Lavasa, demanding an explanation as to why it did not obtain clearances as per rules under Environment Protection Act, amended by notifications in 1994 and 2004. </p><p align="justify">MOEF also asked the corporation, which is developing a hill station across 5000 hectares in Mulshi taluka of Pune district, to stop the ongoing constructions. </p><p align="justify">Lavasa's lawyer, senior counsel Shekhar Nafade, argued that company has invested Rs 6,000 crore in the project, and MOEF's issuing of notice without giving hearing was a &quot;high-handed&quot; action. </p><p align="justify">Advocate Nafade said that construction at Lavasa began in 2004, but MOEF issued notice only last month. &quot;When we asked the state government, it told us that environmental clearances were not necessary because it was a tourism project,&quot; he said. </p><p align="justify">Nafade alleged that notice came to be issued only after some social activists, represented by National Alliance of People's Movements, made a complaint to the environment minister. &quot;This is a case of appeasing political activists,&quot; he said. </p><p align="justify">&quot;What about public sector banks? (who have lent loans for the project),&quot; he asked. </p><p align="justify">The division bench too asked Additional Solicitor General Darius Khambata why MOEF was late in sending the notice. </p><p align="justify">Khambata said that when MOEF came to know about alleged violations was not the issue, but &quot;when did they (Lavasa) know (that clearances were necessary)&quot; was the issue. </p><p align="justify">&quot;They brazenly went on with the construction, though admittedly they had no environmental clearance,&quot; he said. </p><p align="justify">The burden to prove that project was not harming the environment was on Lavasa, he added. </p><p align="justify">Further, Khambata said that MOEF was ready to give hearing to Lavasa at the earliest, and would pass order before December 31. </p><p align="justify">Meanwhile, Alliance of People's Movements, which has already filed a PIL against Lavasa, today demanded that it be allowed to intervene in Lavasa's petition. </p><p align="justify">&quot;The court has now clubbed the PIL with Lavasa's case,&quot; said APM's lawyer advocate Y P Singh. </p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 4626, 'title' => 'Bombay HC stays Env Min's direction to Lavasa to stop construction', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <br /> The Bombay High Court on Tuesday stayed Environment Ministry's direction to Lavasa Corporation to stop construction. However, Lavasa Corporation voluntarily agreed not to carry out any work till December 14. </p> <p align="justify"> On November 25, MOEF issued a show-cause notice to Lavasa, demanding an explanation as to why it did not obtain clearances as per rules under Environment Protection Act, amended by notifications in 1994 and 2004. </p> <p align="justify"> MOEF also asked the corporation, which is developing a hill station across 5000 hectares in Mulshi taluka of Pune district, to stop the ongoing constructions. </p> <p align="justify"> Lavasa's lawyer, senior counsel Shekhar Nafade, argued that company has invested Rs 6,000 crore in the project, and MOEF's issuing of notice without giving hearing was a &quot;high-handed&quot; action. </p> <p align="justify"> Advocate Nafade said that construction at Lavasa began in 2004, but MOEF issued notice only last month. &quot;When we asked the state government, it told us that environmental clearances were not necessary because it was a tourism project,&quot; he said. </p> <p align="justify"> Nafade alleged that notice came to be issued only after some social activists, represented by National Alliance of People's Movements, made a complaint to the environment minister. &quot;This is a case of appeasing political activists,&quot; he said. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;What about public sector banks? (who have lent loans for the project),&quot; he asked. </p> <p align="justify"> The division bench too asked Additional Solicitor General Darius Khambata why MOEF was late in sending the notice. </p> <p align="justify"> Khambata said that when MOEF came to know about alleged violations was not the issue, but &quot;when did they (Lavasa) know (that clearances were necessary)&quot; was the issue. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;They brazenly went on with the construction, though admittedly they had no environmental clearance,&quot; he said. </p> <p align="justify"> The burden to prove that project was not harming the environment was on Lavasa, he added. </p> <p align="justify"> Further, Khambata said that MOEF was ready to give hearing to Lavasa at the earliest, and would pass order before December 31. </p> <p align="justify"> Meanwhile, Alliance of People's Movements, which has already filed a PIL against Lavasa, today demanded that it be allowed to intervene in Lavasa's petition. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;The court has now clubbed the PIL with Lavasa's case,&quot; said APM's lawyer advocate Y P Singh. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Business Standard, 7 December, 2010, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/news-by-industry/services/property-/-cstruction/Bombay-HC-stays-Env-Mins-direction-to-Lavasa-to-stop-construction/arti', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'bombay-hc-stays-env-mins-direction-to-lavasa-to-stop-construction-4717', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4717, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 4626 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Bombay HC stays Env Min's direction to Lavasa to stop construction' $metaKeywords = 'Environment' $metaDesc = ' The Bombay High Court on Tuesday stayed Environment Ministry's direction to Lavasa Corporation to stop construction. However, Lavasa Corporation voluntarily agreed not to carry out any work till December 14. On November 25, MOEF issued a show-cause notice to Lavasa,...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><br />The Bombay High Court on Tuesday stayed Environment Ministry's direction to Lavasa Corporation to stop construction. However, Lavasa Corporation voluntarily agreed not to carry out any work till December 14. </p><p align="justify">On November 25, MOEF issued a show-cause notice to Lavasa, demanding an explanation as to why it did not obtain clearances as per rules under Environment Protection Act, amended by notifications in 1994 and 2004. </p><p align="justify">MOEF also asked the corporation, which is developing a hill station across 5000 hectares in Mulshi taluka of Pune district, to stop the ongoing constructions. </p><p align="justify">Lavasa's lawyer, senior counsel Shekhar Nafade, argued that company has invested Rs 6,000 crore in the project, and MOEF's issuing of notice without giving hearing was a &quot;high-handed&quot; action. </p><p align="justify">Advocate Nafade said that construction at Lavasa began in 2004, but MOEF issued notice only last month. &quot;When we asked the state government, it told us that environmental clearances were not necessary because it was a tourism project,&quot; he said. </p><p align="justify">Nafade alleged that notice came to be issued only after some social activists, represented by National Alliance of People's Movements, made a complaint to the environment minister. &quot;This is a case of appeasing political activists,&quot; he said. </p><p align="justify">&quot;What about public sector banks? (who have lent loans for the project),&quot; he asked. </p><p align="justify">The division bench too asked Additional Solicitor General Darius Khambata why MOEF was late in sending the notice. </p><p align="justify">Khambata said that when MOEF came to know about alleged violations was not the issue, but &quot;when did they (Lavasa) know (that clearances were necessary)&quot; was the issue. </p><p align="justify">&quot;They brazenly went on with the construction, though admittedly they had no environmental clearance,&quot; he said. </p><p align="justify">The burden to prove that project was not harming the environment was on Lavasa, he added. </p><p align="justify">Further, Khambata said that MOEF was ready to give hearing to Lavasa at the earliest, and would pass order before December 31. </p><p align="justify">Meanwhile, Alliance of People's Movements, which has already filed a PIL against Lavasa, today demanded that it be allowed to intervene in Lavasa's petition. </p><p align="justify">&quot;The court has now clubbed the PIL with Lavasa's case,&quot; said APM's lawyer advocate Y P Singh. </p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/bombay-hc-stays-env-mins-direction-to-lavasa-to-stop-construction-4717.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Bombay HC stays Env Min's direction to Lavasa to stop construction | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" The Bombay High Court on Tuesday stayed Environment Ministry's direction to Lavasa Corporation to stop construction. However, Lavasa Corporation voluntarily agreed not to carry out any work till December 14. On November 25, MOEF issued a show-cause notice to Lavasa,..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Bombay HC stays Env Min's direction to Lavasa to stop construction</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p align="justify"><br />The Bombay High Court on Tuesday stayed Environment Ministry's direction to Lavasa Corporation to stop construction. However, Lavasa Corporation voluntarily agreed not to carry out any work till December 14. </p><p align="justify">On November 25, MOEF issued a show-cause notice to Lavasa, demanding an explanation as to why it did not obtain clearances as per rules under Environment Protection Act, amended by notifications in 1994 and 2004. </p><p align="justify">MOEF also asked the corporation, which is developing a hill station across 5000 hectares in Mulshi taluka of Pune district, to stop the ongoing constructions. </p><p align="justify">Lavasa's lawyer, senior counsel Shekhar Nafade, argued that company has invested Rs 6,000 crore in the project, and MOEF's issuing of notice without giving hearing was a "high-handed" action. </p><p align="justify">Advocate Nafade said that construction at Lavasa began in 2004, but MOEF issued notice only last month. "When we asked the state government, it told us that environmental clearances were not necessary because it was a tourism project," he said. </p><p align="justify">Nafade alleged that notice came to be issued only after some social activists, represented by National Alliance of People's Movements, made a complaint to the environment minister. "This is a case of appeasing political activists," he said. </p><p align="justify">"What about public sector banks? (who have lent loans for the project)," he asked. </p><p align="justify">The division bench too asked Additional Solicitor General Darius Khambata why MOEF was late in sending the notice. </p><p align="justify">Khambata said that when MOEF came to know about alleged violations was not the issue, but "when did they (Lavasa) know (that clearances were necessary)" was the issue. </p><p align="justify">"They brazenly went on with the construction, though admittedly they had no environmental clearance," he said. </p><p align="justify">The burden to prove that project was not harming the environment was on Lavasa, he added. </p><p align="justify">Further, Khambata said that MOEF was ready to give hearing to Lavasa at the earliest, and would pass order before December 31. </p><p align="justify">Meanwhile, Alliance of People's Movements, which has already filed a PIL against Lavasa, today demanded that it be allowed to intervene in Lavasa's petition. </p><p align="justify">"The court has now clubbed the PIL with Lavasa's case," said APM's lawyer advocate Y P Singh. </p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5ed9592552-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5ed9592552-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f5ed9592552-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5ed9592552-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5ed9592552-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5ed9592552-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5ed9592552-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f5ed9592552-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f5ed9592552-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 4626, 'title' => 'Bombay HC stays Env Min's direction to Lavasa to stop construction', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <br /> The Bombay High Court on Tuesday stayed Environment Ministry's direction to Lavasa Corporation to stop construction. However, Lavasa Corporation voluntarily agreed not to carry out any work till December 14. </p> <p align="justify"> On November 25, MOEF issued a show-cause notice to Lavasa, demanding an explanation as to why it did not obtain clearances as per rules under Environment Protection Act, amended by notifications in 1994 and 2004. </p> <p align="justify"> MOEF also asked the corporation, which is developing a hill station across 5000 hectares in Mulshi taluka of Pune district, to stop the ongoing constructions. </p> <p align="justify"> Lavasa's lawyer, senior counsel Shekhar Nafade, argued that company has invested Rs 6,000 crore in the project, and MOEF's issuing of notice without giving hearing was a &quot;high-handed&quot; action. </p> <p align="justify"> Advocate Nafade said that construction at Lavasa began in 2004, but MOEF issued notice only last month. &quot;When we asked the state government, it told us that environmental clearances were not necessary because it was a tourism project,&quot; he said. </p> <p align="justify"> Nafade alleged that notice came to be issued only after some social activists, represented by National Alliance of People's Movements, made a complaint to the environment minister. &quot;This is a case of appeasing political activists,&quot; he said. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;What about public sector banks? (who have lent loans for the project),&quot; he asked. </p> <p align="justify"> The division bench too asked Additional Solicitor General Darius Khambata why MOEF was late in sending the notice. </p> <p align="justify"> Khambata said that when MOEF came to know about alleged violations was not the issue, but &quot;when did they (Lavasa) know (that clearances were necessary)&quot; was the issue. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;They brazenly went on with the construction, though admittedly they had no environmental clearance,&quot; he said. </p> <p align="justify"> The burden to prove that project was not harming the environment was on Lavasa, he added. </p> <p align="justify"> Further, Khambata said that MOEF was ready to give hearing to Lavasa at the earliest, and would pass order before December 31. </p> <p align="justify"> Meanwhile, Alliance of People's Movements, which has already filed a PIL against Lavasa, today demanded that it be allowed to intervene in Lavasa's petition. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;The court has now clubbed the PIL with Lavasa's case,&quot; said APM's lawyer advocate Y P Singh. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Business Standard, 7 December, 2010, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/news-by-industry/services/property-/-cstruction/Bombay-HC-stays-Env-Mins-direction-to-Lavasa-to-stop-construction/arti', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'bombay-hc-stays-env-mins-direction-to-lavasa-to-stop-construction-4717', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4717, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 4626, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Bombay HC stays Env Min's direction to Lavasa to stop construction', 'metaKeywords' => 'Environment', 'metaDesc' => ' The Bombay High Court on Tuesday stayed Environment Ministry's direction to Lavasa Corporation to stop construction. However, Lavasa Corporation voluntarily agreed not to carry out any work till December 14. On November 25, MOEF issued a show-cause notice to Lavasa,...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><br />The Bombay High Court on Tuesday stayed Environment Ministry's direction to Lavasa Corporation to stop construction. However, Lavasa Corporation voluntarily agreed not to carry out any work till December 14. </p><p align="justify">On November 25, MOEF issued a show-cause notice to Lavasa, demanding an explanation as to why it did not obtain clearances as per rules under Environment Protection Act, amended by notifications in 1994 and 2004. </p><p align="justify">MOEF also asked the corporation, which is developing a hill station across 5000 hectares in Mulshi taluka of Pune district, to stop the ongoing constructions. </p><p align="justify">Lavasa's lawyer, senior counsel Shekhar Nafade, argued that company has invested Rs 6,000 crore in the project, and MOEF's issuing of notice without giving hearing was a &quot;high-handed&quot; action. </p><p align="justify">Advocate Nafade said that construction at Lavasa began in 2004, but MOEF issued notice only last month. &quot;When we asked the state government, it told us that environmental clearances were not necessary because it was a tourism project,&quot; he said. </p><p align="justify">Nafade alleged that notice came to be issued only after some social activists, represented by National Alliance of People's Movements, made a complaint to the environment minister. &quot;This is a case of appeasing political activists,&quot; he said. </p><p align="justify">&quot;What about public sector banks? (who have lent loans for the project),&quot; he asked. </p><p align="justify">The division bench too asked Additional Solicitor General Darius Khambata why MOEF was late in sending the notice. </p><p align="justify">Khambata said that when MOEF came to know about alleged violations was not the issue, but &quot;when did they (Lavasa) know (that clearances were necessary)&quot; was the issue. </p><p align="justify">&quot;They brazenly went on with the construction, though admittedly they had no environmental clearance,&quot; he said. </p><p align="justify">The burden to prove that project was not harming the environment was on Lavasa, he added. </p><p align="justify">Further, Khambata said that MOEF was ready to give hearing to Lavasa at the earliest, and would pass order before December 31. </p><p align="justify">Meanwhile, Alliance of People's Movements, which has already filed a PIL against Lavasa, today demanded that it be allowed to intervene in Lavasa's petition. </p><p align="justify">&quot;The court has now clubbed the PIL with Lavasa's case,&quot; said APM's lawyer advocate Y P Singh. </p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 4626, 'title' => 'Bombay HC stays Env Min's direction to Lavasa to stop construction', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <br /> The Bombay High Court on Tuesday stayed Environment Ministry's direction to Lavasa Corporation to stop construction. However, Lavasa Corporation voluntarily agreed not to carry out any work till December 14. </p> <p align="justify"> On November 25, MOEF issued a show-cause notice to Lavasa, demanding an explanation as to why it did not obtain clearances as per rules under Environment Protection Act, amended by notifications in 1994 and 2004. </p> <p align="justify"> MOEF also asked the corporation, which is developing a hill station across 5000 hectares in Mulshi taluka of Pune district, to stop the ongoing constructions. </p> <p align="justify"> Lavasa's lawyer, senior counsel Shekhar Nafade, argued that company has invested Rs 6,000 crore in the project, and MOEF's issuing of notice without giving hearing was a &quot;high-handed&quot; action. </p> <p align="justify"> Advocate Nafade said that construction at Lavasa began in 2004, but MOEF issued notice only last month. &quot;When we asked the state government, it told us that environmental clearances were not necessary because it was a tourism project,&quot; he said. </p> <p align="justify"> Nafade alleged that notice came to be issued only after some social activists, represented by National Alliance of People's Movements, made a complaint to the environment minister. &quot;This is a case of appeasing political activists,&quot; he said. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;What about public sector banks? (who have lent loans for the project),&quot; he asked. </p> <p align="justify"> The division bench too asked Additional Solicitor General Darius Khambata why MOEF was late in sending the notice. </p> <p align="justify"> Khambata said that when MOEF came to know about alleged violations was not the issue, but &quot;when did they (Lavasa) know (that clearances were necessary)&quot; was the issue. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;They brazenly went on with the construction, though admittedly they had no environmental clearance,&quot; he said. </p> <p align="justify"> The burden to prove that project was not harming the environment was on Lavasa, he added. </p> <p align="justify"> Further, Khambata said that MOEF was ready to give hearing to Lavasa at the earliest, and would pass order before December 31. </p> <p align="justify"> Meanwhile, Alliance of People's Movements, which has already filed a PIL against Lavasa, today demanded that it be allowed to intervene in Lavasa's petition. </p> <p align="justify"> &quot;The court has now clubbed the PIL with Lavasa's case,&quot; said APM's lawyer advocate Y P Singh. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Business Standard, 7 December, 2010, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/news-by-industry/services/property-/-cstruction/Bombay-HC-stays-Env-Mins-direction-to-Lavasa-to-stop-construction/arti', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'bombay-hc-stays-env-mins-direction-to-lavasa-to-stop-construction-4717', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4717, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 4626 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Bombay HC stays Env Min's direction to Lavasa to stop construction' $metaKeywords = 'Environment' $metaDesc = ' The Bombay High Court on Tuesday stayed Environment Ministry's direction to Lavasa Corporation to stop construction. However, Lavasa Corporation voluntarily agreed not to carry out any work till December 14. On November 25, MOEF issued a show-cause notice to Lavasa,...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><br />The Bombay High Court on Tuesday stayed Environment Ministry's direction to Lavasa Corporation to stop construction. However, Lavasa Corporation voluntarily agreed not to carry out any work till December 14. </p><p align="justify">On November 25, MOEF issued a show-cause notice to Lavasa, demanding an explanation as to why it did not obtain clearances as per rules under Environment Protection Act, amended by notifications in 1994 and 2004. </p><p align="justify">MOEF also asked the corporation, which is developing a hill station across 5000 hectares in Mulshi taluka of Pune district, to stop the ongoing constructions. </p><p align="justify">Lavasa's lawyer, senior counsel Shekhar Nafade, argued that company has invested Rs 6,000 crore in the project, and MOEF's issuing of notice without giving hearing was a &quot;high-handed&quot; action. </p><p align="justify">Advocate Nafade said that construction at Lavasa began in 2004, but MOEF issued notice only last month. &quot;When we asked the state government, it told us that environmental clearances were not necessary because it was a tourism project,&quot; he said. </p><p align="justify">Nafade alleged that notice came to be issued only after some social activists, represented by National Alliance of People's Movements, made a complaint to the environment minister. &quot;This is a case of appeasing political activists,&quot; he said. </p><p align="justify">&quot;What about public sector banks? (who have lent loans for the project),&quot; he asked. </p><p align="justify">The division bench too asked Additional Solicitor General Darius Khambata why MOEF was late in sending the notice. </p><p align="justify">Khambata said that when MOEF came to know about alleged violations was not the issue, but &quot;when did they (Lavasa) know (that clearances were necessary)&quot; was the issue. </p><p align="justify">&quot;They brazenly went on with the construction, though admittedly they had no environmental clearance,&quot; he said. </p><p align="justify">The burden to prove that project was not harming the environment was on Lavasa, he added. </p><p align="justify">Further, Khambata said that MOEF was ready to give hearing to Lavasa at the earliest, and would pass order before December 31. </p><p align="justify">Meanwhile, Alliance of People's Movements, which has already filed a PIL against Lavasa, today demanded that it be allowed to intervene in Lavasa's petition. </p><p align="justify">&quot;The court has now clubbed the PIL with Lavasa's case,&quot; said APM's lawyer advocate Y P Singh. </p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/bombay-hc-stays-env-mins-direction-to-lavasa-to-stop-construction-4717.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Bombay HC stays Env Min's direction to Lavasa to stop construction | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" The Bombay High Court on Tuesday stayed Environment Ministry's direction to Lavasa Corporation to stop construction. However, Lavasa Corporation voluntarily agreed not to carry out any work till December 14. On November 25, MOEF issued a show-cause notice to Lavasa,..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Bombay HC stays Env Min's direction to Lavasa to stop construction</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p align="justify"><br />The Bombay High Court on Tuesday stayed Environment Ministry's direction to Lavasa Corporation to stop construction. However, Lavasa Corporation voluntarily agreed not to carry out any work till December 14. </p><p align="justify">On November 25, MOEF issued a show-cause notice to Lavasa, demanding an explanation as to why it did not obtain clearances as per rules under Environment Protection Act, amended by notifications in 1994 and 2004. </p><p align="justify">MOEF also asked the corporation, which is developing a hill station across 5000 hectares in Mulshi taluka of Pune district, to stop the ongoing constructions. </p><p align="justify">Lavasa's lawyer, senior counsel Shekhar Nafade, argued that company has invested Rs 6,000 crore in the project, and MOEF's issuing of notice without giving hearing was a "high-handed" action. </p><p align="justify">Advocate Nafade said that construction at Lavasa began in 2004, but MOEF issued notice only last month. "When we asked the state government, it told us that environmental clearances were not necessary because it was a tourism project," he said. </p><p align="justify">Nafade alleged that notice came to be issued only after some social activists, represented by National Alliance of People's Movements, made a complaint to the environment minister. "This is a case of appeasing political activists," he said. </p><p align="justify">"What about public sector banks? (who have lent loans for the project)," he asked. </p><p align="justify">The division bench too asked Additional Solicitor General Darius Khambata why MOEF was late in sending the notice. </p><p align="justify">Khambata said that when MOEF came to know about alleged violations was not the issue, but "when did they (Lavasa) know (that clearances were necessary)" was the issue. </p><p align="justify">"They brazenly went on with the construction, though admittedly they had no environmental clearance," he said. </p><p align="justify">The burden to prove that project was not harming the environment was on Lavasa, he added. </p><p align="justify">Further, Khambata said that MOEF was ready to give hearing to Lavasa at the earliest, and would pass order before December 31. </p><p align="justify">Meanwhile, Alliance of People's Movements, which has already filed a PIL against Lavasa, today demanded that it be allowed to intervene in Lavasa's petition. </p><p align="justify">"The court has now clubbed the PIL with Lavasa's case," said APM's lawyer advocate Y P Singh. </p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 4626, 'title' => 'Bombay HC stays Env Min's direction to Lavasa to stop construction', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <br /> The Bombay High Court on Tuesday stayed Environment Ministry's direction to Lavasa Corporation to stop construction. However, Lavasa Corporation voluntarily agreed not to carry out any work till December 14. </p> <p align="justify"> On November 25, MOEF issued a show-cause notice to Lavasa, demanding an explanation as to why it did not obtain clearances as per rules under Environment Protection Act, amended by notifications in 1994 and 2004. </p> <p align="justify"> MOEF also asked the corporation, which is developing a hill station across 5000 hectares in Mulshi taluka of Pune district, to stop the ongoing constructions. </p> <p align="justify"> Lavasa's lawyer, senior counsel Shekhar Nafade, argued that company has invested Rs 6,000 crore in the project, and MOEF's issuing of notice without giving hearing was a "high-handed" action. </p> <p align="justify"> Advocate Nafade said that construction at Lavasa began in 2004, but MOEF issued notice only last month. "When we asked the state government, it told us that environmental clearances were not necessary because it was a tourism project," he said. </p> <p align="justify"> Nafade alleged that notice came to be issued only after some social activists, represented by National Alliance of People's Movements, made a complaint to the environment minister. "This is a case of appeasing political activists," he said. </p> <p align="justify"> "What about public sector banks? (who have lent loans for the project)," he asked. </p> <p align="justify"> The division bench too asked Additional Solicitor General Darius Khambata why MOEF was late in sending the notice. </p> <p align="justify"> Khambata said that when MOEF came to know about alleged violations was not the issue, but "when did they (Lavasa) know (that clearances were necessary)" was the issue. </p> <p align="justify"> "They brazenly went on with the construction, though admittedly they had no environmental clearance," he said. </p> <p align="justify"> The burden to prove that project was not harming the environment was on Lavasa, he added. </p> <p align="justify"> Further, Khambata said that MOEF was ready to give hearing to Lavasa at the earliest, and would pass order before December 31. </p> <p align="justify"> Meanwhile, Alliance of People's Movements, which has already filed a PIL against Lavasa, today demanded that it be allowed to intervene in Lavasa's petition. </p> <p align="justify"> "The court has now clubbed the PIL with Lavasa's case," said APM's lawyer advocate Y P Singh. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Business Standard, 7 December, 2010, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/news-by-industry/services/property-/-cstruction/Bombay-HC-stays-Env-Mins-direction-to-Lavasa-to-stop-construction/arti', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'bombay-hc-stays-env-mins-direction-to-lavasa-to-stop-construction-4717', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4717, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 4626, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Bombay HC stays Env Min's direction to Lavasa to stop construction', 'metaKeywords' => 'Environment', 'metaDesc' => ' The Bombay High Court on Tuesday stayed Environment Ministry's direction to Lavasa Corporation to stop construction. However, Lavasa Corporation voluntarily agreed not to carry out any work till December 14. On November 25, MOEF issued a show-cause notice to Lavasa,...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><br />The Bombay High Court on Tuesday stayed Environment Ministry's direction to Lavasa Corporation to stop construction. However, Lavasa Corporation voluntarily agreed not to carry out any work till December 14. </p><p align="justify">On November 25, MOEF issued a show-cause notice to Lavasa, demanding an explanation as to why it did not obtain clearances as per rules under Environment Protection Act, amended by notifications in 1994 and 2004. </p><p align="justify">MOEF also asked the corporation, which is developing a hill station across 5000 hectares in Mulshi taluka of Pune district, to stop the ongoing constructions. </p><p align="justify">Lavasa's lawyer, senior counsel Shekhar Nafade, argued that company has invested Rs 6,000 crore in the project, and MOEF's issuing of notice without giving hearing was a "high-handed" action. </p><p align="justify">Advocate Nafade said that construction at Lavasa began in 2004, but MOEF issued notice only last month. "When we asked the state government, it told us that environmental clearances were not necessary because it was a tourism project," he said. </p><p align="justify">Nafade alleged that notice came to be issued only after some social activists, represented by National Alliance of People's Movements, made a complaint to the environment minister. "This is a case of appeasing political activists," he said. </p><p align="justify">"What about public sector banks? (who have lent loans for the project)," he asked. </p><p align="justify">The division bench too asked Additional Solicitor General Darius Khambata why MOEF was late in sending the notice. </p><p align="justify">Khambata said that when MOEF came to know about alleged violations was not the issue, but "when did they (Lavasa) know (that clearances were necessary)" was the issue. </p><p align="justify">"They brazenly went on with the construction, though admittedly they had no environmental clearance," he said. </p><p align="justify">The burden to prove that project was not harming the environment was on Lavasa, he added. </p><p align="justify">Further, Khambata said that MOEF was ready to give hearing to Lavasa at the earliest, and would pass order before December 31. </p><p align="justify">Meanwhile, Alliance of People's Movements, which has already filed a PIL against Lavasa, today demanded that it be allowed to intervene in Lavasa's petition. </p><p align="justify">"The court has now clubbed the PIL with Lavasa's case," said APM's lawyer advocate Y P Singh. </p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 4626, 'title' => 'Bombay HC stays Env Min's direction to Lavasa to stop construction', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <br /> The Bombay High Court on Tuesday stayed Environment Ministry's direction to Lavasa Corporation to stop construction. However, Lavasa Corporation voluntarily agreed not to carry out any work till December 14. </p> <p align="justify"> On November 25, MOEF issued a show-cause notice to Lavasa, demanding an explanation as to why it did not obtain clearances as per rules under Environment Protection Act, amended by notifications in 1994 and 2004. </p> <p align="justify"> MOEF also asked the corporation, which is developing a hill station across 5000 hectares in Mulshi taluka of Pune district, to stop the ongoing constructions. </p> <p align="justify"> Lavasa's lawyer, senior counsel Shekhar Nafade, argued that company has invested Rs 6,000 crore in the project, and MOEF's issuing of notice without giving hearing was a "high-handed" action. </p> <p align="justify"> Advocate Nafade said that construction at Lavasa began in 2004, but MOEF issued notice only last month. "When we asked the state government, it told us that environmental clearances were not necessary because it was a tourism project," he said. </p> <p align="justify"> Nafade alleged that notice came to be issued only after some social activists, represented by National Alliance of People's Movements, made a complaint to the environment minister. "This is a case of appeasing political activists," he said. </p> <p align="justify"> "What about public sector banks? (who have lent loans for the project)," he asked. </p> <p align="justify"> The division bench too asked Additional Solicitor General Darius Khambata why MOEF was late in sending the notice. </p> <p align="justify"> Khambata said that when MOEF came to know about alleged violations was not the issue, but "when did they (Lavasa) know (that clearances were necessary)" was the issue. </p> <p align="justify"> "They brazenly went on with the construction, though admittedly they had no environmental clearance," he said. </p> <p align="justify"> The burden to prove that project was not harming the environment was on Lavasa, he added. </p> <p align="justify"> Further, Khambata said that MOEF was ready to give hearing to Lavasa at the earliest, and would pass order before December 31. </p> <p align="justify"> Meanwhile, Alliance of People's Movements, which has already filed a PIL against Lavasa, today demanded that it be allowed to intervene in Lavasa's petition. </p> <p align="justify"> "The court has now clubbed the PIL with Lavasa's case," said APM's lawyer advocate Y P Singh. </p>', 'credit_writer' => 'The Business Standard, 7 December, 2010, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/news-by-industry/services/property-/-cstruction/Bombay-HC-stays-Env-Mins-direction-to-Lavasa-to-stop-construction/arti', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'bombay-hc-stays-env-mins-direction-to-lavasa-to-stop-construction-4717', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 4717, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 4626 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Bombay HC stays Env Min's direction to Lavasa to stop construction' $metaKeywords = 'Environment' $metaDesc = ' The Bombay High Court on Tuesday stayed Environment Ministry's direction to Lavasa Corporation to stop construction. However, Lavasa Corporation voluntarily agreed not to carry out any work till December 14. On November 25, MOEF issued a show-cause notice to Lavasa,...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><br />The Bombay High Court on Tuesday stayed Environment Ministry's direction to Lavasa Corporation to stop construction. However, Lavasa Corporation voluntarily agreed not to carry out any work till December 14. </p><p align="justify">On November 25, MOEF issued a show-cause notice to Lavasa, demanding an explanation as to why it did not obtain clearances as per rules under Environment Protection Act, amended by notifications in 1994 and 2004. </p><p align="justify">MOEF also asked the corporation, which is developing a hill station across 5000 hectares in Mulshi taluka of Pune district, to stop the ongoing constructions. </p><p align="justify">Lavasa's lawyer, senior counsel Shekhar Nafade, argued that company has invested Rs 6,000 crore in the project, and MOEF's issuing of notice without giving hearing was a "high-handed" action. </p><p align="justify">Advocate Nafade said that construction at Lavasa began in 2004, but MOEF issued notice only last month. "When we asked the state government, it told us that environmental clearances were not necessary because it was a tourism project," he said. </p><p align="justify">Nafade alleged that notice came to be issued only after some social activists, represented by National Alliance of People's Movements, made a complaint to the environment minister. "This is a case of appeasing political activists," he said. </p><p align="justify">"What about public sector banks? (who have lent loans for the project)," he asked. </p><p align="justify">The division bench too asked Additional Solicitor General Darius Khambata why MOEF was late in sending the notice. </p><p align="justify">Khambata said that when MOEF came to know about alleged violations was not the issue, but "when did they (Lavasa) know (that clearances were necessary)" was the issue. </p><p align="justify">"They brazenly went on with the construction, though admittedly they had no environmental clearance," he said. </p><p align="justify">The burden to prove that project was not harming the environment was on Lavasa, he added. </p><p align="justify">Further, Khambata said that MOEF was ready to give hearing to Lavasa at the earliest, and would pass order before December 31. </p><p align="justify">Meanwhile, Alliance of People's Movements, which has already filed a PIL against Lavasa, today demanded that it be allowed to intervene in Lavasa's petition. </p><p align="justify">"The court has now clubbed the PIL with Lavasa's case," said APM's lawyer advocate Y P Singh. </p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Bombay HC stays Env Min's direction to Lavasa to stop construction |
On November 25, MOEF issued a show-cause notice to Lavasa, demanding an explanation as to why it did not obtain clearances as per rules under Environment Protection Act, amended by notifications in 1994 and 2004. MOEF also asked the corporation, which is developing a hill station across 5000 hectares in Mulshi taluka of Pune district, to stop the ongoing constructions. Lavasa's lawyer, senior counsel Shekhar Nafade, argued that company has invested Rs 6,000 crore in the project, and MOEF's issuing of notice without giving hearing was a "high-handed" action. Advocate Nafade said that construction at Lavasa began in 2004, but MOEF issued notice only last month. "When we asked the state government, it told us that environmental clearances were not necessary because it was a tourism project," he said. Nafade alleged that notice came to be issued only after some social activists, represented by National Alliance of People's Movements, made a complaint to the environment minister. "This is a case of appeasing political activists," he said. "What about public sector banks? (who have lent loans for the project)," he asked. The division bench too asked Additional Solicitor General Darius Khambata why MOEF was late in sending the notice. Khambata said that when MOEF came to know about alleged violations was not the issue, but "when did they (Lavasa) know (that clearances were necessary)" was the issue. "They brazenly went on with the construction, though admittedly they had no environmental clearance," he said. The burden to prove that project was not harming the environment was on Lavasa, he added. Further, Khambata said that MOEF was ready to give hearing to Lavasa at the earliest, and would pass order before December 31. Meanwhile, Alliance of People's Movements, which has already filed a PIL against Lavasa, today demanded that it be allowed to intervene in Lavasa's petition. "The court has now clubbed the PIL with Lavasa's case," said APM's lawyer advocate Y P Singh. |