Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/cabinet-clears-change-in-divorce-law-women-to-get-part-of-husbands-property-15219/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/cabinet-clears-change-in-divorce-law-women-to-get-part-of-husbands-property-15219/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/cabinet-clears-change-in-divorce-law-women-to-get-part-of-husbands-property-15219/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/cabinet-clears-change-in-divorce-law-women-to-get-part-of-husbands-property-15219/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea12f5b8efc-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea12f5b8efc-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67ea12f5b8efc-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea12f5b8efc-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea12f5b8efc-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea12f5b8efc-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea12f5b8efc-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67ea12f5b8efc-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67ea12f5b8efc-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 15095,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Cabinet clears change in divorce law: Women to get part of husband’s property&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-Express News Service&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bowing to pressure from opposition parties and women&amp;rsquo;s rights organisations, the union cabinet today cleared some more amendments to the Marriage Laws (Amendment) Bill to give women a clearly-defined share in their husband&amp;rsquo;s &amp;ldquo;immovable residential property&amp;rdquo; &amp;mdash; including that acquired before marriage &amp;mdash; in divorce cases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If passed, the amended Bill would allow &amp;ldquo;equal share of residential property&amp;rdquo; to the wife and children. The wife&amp;rsquo;s share will be decided by the courts, &amp;ldquo;considering her living standards&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The cabinet, however, decided to retain the mandatory six-month cooling-off period, which the Bill had proposed to do away with in case of divorce with mutual consent. But the cooling-off period can be waived if the divorce application is &amp;ldquo;made by both the parties instead of either of the parties&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;On an application being made by both the parties, the court may reduce the period specified under sub-section 2 of Section 13B to a lesser period and may waive off the requirement for moving the motion by both the parties if it is satisfied that the parties to the marriage are not in a position to reconcile their differences,&amp;rdquo; says the proposed amendment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As per the latest amendments, while a wife would now be eligible to oppose a husband&amp;rsquo;s plea for divorce under the new &amp;ldquo;irretrievable breakdown of marriage&amp;rdquo; clause, the husband shall not have such a right if the wife moves the court on the same grounds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On April 30, when Union Law Minister Salman Khurshid introduced the Bill, which, among other things, proposed to include &amp;ldquo;irretrievable breakdown of marriage&amp;rsquo;&amp;rsquo; as one of the grounds for grant of divorce, he faced stiff opposition from the BJP.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Speaking in the RS, Leader of the Opposition Arun Jaitley had said that unless the matter of sharing assets was considered seriously, the proposed changes could be misused against the women. He had also pointed out that countries which allowed for irretrievable breakdown as a ground for divorce have a strong support system for the wife and children.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Law Ministry Bill also seeks to amend the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and the Special Marriage Act, 1954.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 18 May, 2012, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/cabinet-clears-change-in-divorce-law-women-to-get-part-of-husbands-property/950887/0&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;cabinet-clears-change-in-divorce-law-women-to-get-part-of-husbands-property-15219&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 15219,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 15095,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Cabinet clears change in divorce law: Women to get part of husband’s property&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Law and Justice,Gender&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-Express News Service

Bowing to pressure from opposition parties and women&amp;rsquo;s rights organisations, the union cabinet today cleared some more amendments to the Marriage Laws (Amendment) Bill to give women a clearly-defined share in their husband&amp;rsquo;s &amp;ldquo;immovable residential property&amp;rdquo; &amp;mdash; including...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-Express News Service&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Bowing to pressure from opposition parties and women&amp;rsquo;s rights organisations, the union cabinet today cleared some more amendments to the Marriage Laws (Amendment) Bill to give women a clearly-defined share in their husband&amp;rsquo;s &amp;ldquo;immovable residential property&amp;rdquo; &amp;mdash; including that acquired before marriage &amp;mdash; in divorce cases.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If passed, the amended Bill would allow &amp;ldquo;equal share of residential property&amp;rdquo; to the wife and children. The wife&amp;rsquo;s share will be decided by the courts, &amp;ldquo;considering her living standards&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The cabinet, however, decided to retain the mandatory six-month cooling-off period, which the Bill had proposed to do away with in case of divorce with mutual consent. But the cooling-off period can be waived if the divorce application is &amp;ldquo;made by both the parties instead of either of the parties&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;On an application being made by both the parties, the court may reduce the period specified under sub-section 2 of Section 13B to a lesser period and may waive off the requirement for moving the motion by both the parties if it is satisfied that the parties to the marriage are not in a position to reconcile their differences,&amp;rdquo; says the proposed amendment.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As per the latest amendments, while a wife would now be eligible to oppose a husband&amp;rsquo;s plea for divorce under the new &amp;ldquo;irretrievable breakdown of marriage&amp;rdquo; clause, the husband shall not have such a right if the wife moves the court on the same grounds.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On April 30, when Union Law Minister Salman Khurshid introduced the Bill, which, among other things, proposed to include &amp;ldquo;irretrievable breakdown of marriage&amp;rsquo;&amp;rsquo; as one of the grounds for grant of divorce, he faced stiff opposition from the BJP.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Speaking in the RS, Leader of the Opposition Arun Jaitley had said that unless the matter of sharing assets was considered seriously, the proposed changes could be misused against the women. He had also pointed out that countries which allowed for irretrievable breakdown as a ground for divorce have a strong support system for the wife and children.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Law Ministry Bill also seeks to amend the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and the Special Marriage Act, 1954.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 15095,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Cabinet clears change in divorce law: Women to get part of husband’s property&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-Express News Service&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bowing to pressure from opposition parties and women&amp;rsquo;s rights organisations, the union cabinet today cleared some more amendments to the Marriage Laws (Amendment) Bill to give women a clearly-defined share in their husband&amp;rsquo;s &amp;ldquo;immovable residential property&amp;rdquo; &amp;mdash; including that acquired before marriage &amp;mdash; in divorce cases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If passed, the amended Bill would allow &amp;ldquo;equal share of residential property&amp;rdquo; to the wife and children. The wife&amp;rsquo;s share will be decided by the courts, &amp;ldquo;considering her living standards&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The cabinet, however, decided to retain the mandatory six-month cooling-off period, which the Bill had proposed to do away with in case of divorce with mutual consent. But the cooling-off period can be waived if the divorce application is &amp;ldquo;made by both the parties instead of either of the parties&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;On an application being made by both the parties, the court may reduce the period specified under sub-section 2 of Section 13B to a lesser period and may waive off the requirement for moving the motion by both the parties if it is satisfied that the parties to the marriage are not in a position to reconcile their differences,&amp;rdquo; says the proposed amendment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As per the latest amendments, while a wife would now be eligible to oppose a husband&amp;rsquo;s plea for divorce under the new &amp;ldquo;irretrievable breakdown of marriage&amp;rdquo; clause, the husband shall not have such a right if the wife moves the court on the same grounds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On April 30, when Union Law Minister Salman Khurshid introduced the Bill, which, among other things, proposed to include &amp;ldquo;irretrievable breakdown of marriage&amp;rsquo;&amp;rsquo; as one of the grounds for grant of divorce, he faced stiff opposition from the BJP.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Speaking in the RS, Leader of the Opposition Arun Jaitley had said that unless the matter of sharing assets was considered seriously, the proposed changes could be misused against the women. He had also pointed out that countries which allowed for irretrievable breakdown as a ground for divorce have a strong support system for the wife and children.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Law Ministry Bill also seeks to amend the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and the Special Marriage Act, 1954.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 18 May, 2012, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/cabinet-clears-change-in-divorce-law-women-to-get-part-of-husbands-property/950887/0&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;cabinet-clears-change-in-divorce-law-women-to-get-part-of-husbands-property-15219&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 15219,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 15095
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Cabinet clears change in divorce law: Women to get part of husband’s property&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Law and Justice,Gender&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-Express News Service

Bowing to pressure from opposition parties and women&amp;rsquo;s rights organisations, the union cabinet today cleared some more amendments to the Marriage Laws (Amendment) Bill to give women a clearly-defined share in their husband&amp;rsquo;s &amp;ldquo;immovable residential property&amp;rdquo; &amp;mdash; including...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-Express News Service&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Bowing to pressure from opposition parties and women&amp;rsquo;s rights organisations, the union cabinet today cleared some more amendments to the Marriage Laws (Amendment) Bill to give women a clearly-defined share in their husband&amp;rsquo;s &amp;ldquo;immovable residential property&amp;rdquo; &amp;mdash; including that acquired before marriage &amp;mdash; in divorce cases.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If passed, the amended Bill would allow &amp;ldquo;equal share of residential property&amp;rdquo; to the wife and children. The wife&amp;rsquo;s share will be decided by the courts, &amp;ldquo;considering her living standards&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The cabinet, however, decided to retain the mandatory six-month cooling-off period, which the Bill had proposed to do away with in case of divorce with mutual consent. But the cooling-off period can be waived if the divorce application is &amp;ldquo;made by both the parties instead of either of the parties&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;On an application being made by both the parties, the court may reduce the period specified under sub-section 2 of Section 13B to a lesser period and may waive off the requirement for moving the motion by both the parties if it is satisfied that the parties to the marriage are not in a position to reconcile their differences,&amp;rdquo; says the proposed amendment.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As per the latest amendments, while a wife would now be eligible to oppose a husband&amp;rsquo;s plea for divorce under the new &amp;ldquo;irretrievable breakdown of marriage&amp;rdquo; clause, the husband shall not have such a right if the wife moves the court on the same grounds.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On April 30, when Union Law Minister Salman Khurshid introduced the Bill, which, among other things, proposed to include &amp;ldquo;irretrievable breakdown of marriage&amp;rsquo;&amp;rsquo; as one of the grounds for grant of divorce, he faced stiff opposition from the BJP.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Speaking in the RS, Leader of the Opposition Arun Jaitley had said that unless the matter of sharing assets was considered seriously, the proposed changes could be misused against the women. He had also pointed out that countries which allowed for irretrievable breakdown as a ground for divorce have a strong support system for the wife and children.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Law Ministry Bill also seeks to amend the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and the Special Marriage Act, 1954.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/cabinet-clears-change-in-divorce-law-women-to-get-part-of-husbands-property-15219.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Cabinet clears change in divorce law: Women to get part of husband’s property | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-Express News Service

Bowing to pressure from opposition parties and women&rsquo;s rights organisations, the union cabinet today cleared some more amendments to the Marriage Laws (Amendment) Bill to give women a clearly-defined share in their husband&rsquo;s &ldquo;immovable residential property&rdquo; &mdash; including..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Cabinet clears change in divorce law: Women to get part of husband’s property</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-Express News Service<br /><br />Bowing to pressure from opposition parties and women&rsquo;s rights organisations, the union cabinet today cleared some more amendments to the Marriage Laws (Amendment) Bill to give women a clearly-defined share in their husband&rsquo;s &ldquo;immovable residential property&rdquo; &mdash; including that acquired before marriage &mdash; in divorce cases.<br /><br />If passed, the amended Bill would allow &ldquo;equal share of residential property&rdquo; to the wife and children. The wife&rsquo;s share will be decided by the courts, &ldquo;considering her living standards&rdquo;.<br /><br />The cabinet, however, decided to retain the mandatory six-month cooling-off period, which the Bill had proposed to do away with in case of divorce with mutual consent. But the cooling-off period can be waived if the divorce application is &ldquo;made by both the parties instead of either of the parties&rdquo;.<br /><br />&ldquo;On an application being made by both the parties, the court may reduce the period specified under sub-section 2 of Section 13B to a lesser period and may waive off the requirement for moving the motion by both the parties if it is satisfied that the parties to the marriage are not in a position to reconcile their differences,&rdquo; says the proposed amendment.<br /><br />As per the latest amendments, while a wife would now be eligible to oppose a husband&rsquo;s plea for divorce under the new &ldquo;irretrievable breakdown of marriage&rdquo; clause, the husband shall not have such a right if the wife moves the court on the same grounds.<br /><br />On April 30, when Union Law Minister Salman Khurshid introduced the Bill, which, among other things, proposed to include &ldquo;irretrievable breakdown of marriage&rsquo;&rsquo; as one of the grounds for grant of divorce, he faced stiff opposition from the BJP.<br /><br />Speaking in the RS, Leader of the Opposition Arun Jaitley had said that unless the matter of sharing assets was considered seriously, the proposed changes could be misused against the women. He had also pointed out that countries which allowed for irretrievable breakdown as a ground for divorce have a strong support system for the wife and children.<br /><br />The Law Ministry Bill also seeks to amend the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and the Special Marriage Act, 1954.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea12f5b8efc-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea12f5b8efc-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67ea12f5b8efc-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea12f5b8efc-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea12f5b8efc-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea12f5b8efc-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea12f5b8efc-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67ea12f5b8efc-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67ea12f5b8efc-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 15095,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Cabinet clears change in divorce law: Women to get part of husband’s property&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-Express News Service&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bowing to pressure from opposition parties and women&amp;rsquo;s rights organisations, the union cabinet today cleared some more amendments to the Marriage Laws (Amendment) Bill to give women a clearly-defined share in their husband&amp;rsquo;s &amp;ldquo;immovable residential property&amp;rdquo; &amp;mdash; including that acquired before marriage &amp;mdash; in divorce cases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If passed, the amended Bill would allow &amp;ldquo;equal share of residential property&amp;rdquo; to the wife and children. The wife&amp;rsquo;s share will be decided by the courts, &amp;ldquo;considering her living standards&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The cabinet, however, decided to retain the mandatory six-month cooling-off period, which the Bill had proposed to do away with in case of divorce with mutual consent. But the cooling-off period can be waived if the divorce application is &amp;ldquo;made by both the parties instead of either of the parties&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;On an application being made by both the parties, the court may reduce the period specified under sub-section 2 of Section 13B to a lesser period and may waive off the requirement for moving the motion by both the parties if it is satisfied that the parties to the marriage are not in a position to reconcile their differences,&amp;rdquo; says the proposed amendment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As per the latest amendments, while a wife would now be eligible to oppose a husband&amp;rsquo;s plea for divorce under the new &amp;ldquo;irretrievable breakdown of marriage&amp;rdquo; clause, the husband shall not have such a right if the wife moves the court on the same grounds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On April 30, when Union Law Minister Salman Khurshid introduced the Bill, which, among other things, proposed to include &amp;ldquo;irretrievable breakdown of marriage&amp;rsquo;&amp;rsquo; as one of the grounds for grant of divorce, he faced stiff opposition from the BJP.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Speaking in the RS, Leader of the Opposition Arun Jaitley had said that unless the matter of sharing assets was considered seriously, the proposed changes could be misused against the women. He had also pointed out that countries which allowed for irretrievable breakdown as a ground for divorce have a strong support system for the wife and children.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Law Ministry Bill also seeks to amend the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and the Special Marriage Act, 1954.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 18 May, 2012, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/cabinet-clears-change-in-divorce-law-women-to-get-part-of-husbands-property/950887/0&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;cabinet-clears-change-in-divorce-law-women-to-get-part-of-husbands-property-15219&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 15219,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 15095,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Cabinet clears change in divorce law: Women to get part of husband’s property&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Law and Justice,Gender&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-Express News Service

Bowing to pressure from opposition parties and women&amp;rsquo;s rights organisations, the union cabinet today cleared some more amendments to the Marriage Laws (Amendment) Bill to give women a clearly-defined share in their husband&amp;rsquo;s &amp;ldquo;immovable residential property&amp;rdquo; &amp;mdash; including...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-Express News Service&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Bowing to pressure from opposition parties and women&amp;rsquo;s rights organisations, the union cabinet today cleared some more amendments to the Marriage Laws (Amendment) Bill to give women a clearly-defined share in their husband&amp;rsquo;s &amp;ldquo;immovable residential property&amp;rdquo; &amp;mdash; including that acquired before marriage &amp;mdash; in divorce cases.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If passed, the amended Bill would allow &amp;ldquo;equal share of residential property&amp;rdquo; to the wife and children. The wife&amp;rsquo;s share will be decided by the courts, &amp;ldquo;considering her living standards&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The cabinet, however, decided to retain the mandatory six-month cooling-off period, which the Bill had proposed to do away with in case of divorce with mutual consent. But the cooling-off period can be waived if the divorce application is &amp;ldquo;made by both the parties instead of either of the parties&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;On an application being made by both the parties, the court may reduce the period specified under sub-section 2 of Section 13B to a lesser period and may waive off the requirement for moving the motion by both the parties if it is satisfied that the parties to the marriage are not in a position to reconcile their differences,&amp;rdquo; says the proposed amendment.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As per the latest amendments, while a wife would now be eligible to oppose a husband&amp;rsquo;s plea for divorce under the new &amp;ldquo;irretrievable breakdown of marriage&amp;rdquo; clause, the husband shall not have such a right if the wife moves the court on the same grounds.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On April 30, when Union Law Minister Salman Khurshid introduced the Bill, which, among other things, proposed to include &amp;ldquo;irretrievable breakdown of marriage&amp;rsquo;&amp;rsquo; as one of the grounds for grant of divorce, he faced stiff opposition from the BJP.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Speaking in the RS, Leader of the Opposition Arun Jaitley had said that unless the matter of sharing assets was considered seriously, the proposed changes could be misused against the women. He had also pointed out that countries which allowed for irretrievable breakdown as a ground for divorce have a strong support system for the wife and children.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Law Ministry Bill also seeks to amend the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and the Special Marriage Act, 1954.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 15095,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Cabinet clears change in divorce law: Women to get part of husband’s property&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-Express News Service&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bowing to pressure from opposition parties and women&amp;rsquo;s rights organisations, the union cabinet today cleared some more amendments to the Marriage Laws (Amendment) Bill to give women a clearly-defined share in their husband&amp;rsquo;s &amp;ldquo;immovable residential property&amp;rdquo; &amp;mdash; including that acquired before marriage &amp;mdash; in divorce cases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If passed, the amended Bill would allow &amp;ldquo;equal share of residential property&amp;rdquo; to the wife and children. The wife&amp;rsquo;s share will be decided by the courts, &amp;ldquo;considering her living standards&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The cabinet, however, decided to retain the mandatory six-month cooling-off period, which the Bill had proposed to do away with in case of divorce with mutual consent. But the cooling-off period can be waived if the divorce application is &amp;ldquo;made by both the parties instead of either of the parties&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;On an application being made by both the parties, the court may reduce the period specified under sub-section 2 of Section 13B to a lesser period and may waive off the requirement for moving the motion by both the parties if it is satisfied that the parties to the marriage are not in a position to reconcile their differences,&amp;rdquo; says the proposed amendment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As per the latest amendments, while a wife would now be eligible to oppose a husband&amp;rsquo;s plea for divorce under the new &amp;ldquo;irretrievable breakdown of marriage&amp;rdquo; clause, the husband shall not have such a right if the wife moves the court on the same grounds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On April 30, when Union Law Minister Salman Khurshid introduced the Bill, which, among other things, proposed to include &amp;ldquo;irretrievable breakdown of marriage&amp;rsquo;&amp;rsquo; as one of the grounds for grant of divorce, he faced stiff opposition from the BJP.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Speaking in the RS, Leader of the Opposition Arun Jaitley had said that unless the matter of sharing assets was considered seriously, the proposed changes could be misused against the women. He had also pointed out that countries which allowed for irretrievable breakdown as a ground for divorce have a strong support system for the wife and children.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Law Ministry Bill also seeks to amend the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and the Special Marriage Act, 1954.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 18 May, 2012, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/cabinet-clears-change-in-divorce-law-women-to-get-part-of-husbands-property/950887/0&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;cabinet-clears-change-in-divorce-law-women-to-get-part-of-husbands-property-15219&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 15219,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 15095
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Cabinet clears change in divorce law: Women to get part of husband’s property&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Law and Justice,Gender&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-Express News Service

Bowing to pressure from opposition parties and women&amp;rsquo;s rights organisations, the union cabinet today cleared some more amendments to the Marriage Laws (Amendment) Bill to give women a clearly-defined share in their husband&amp;rsquo;s &amp;ldquo;immovable residential property&amp;rdquo; &amp;mdash; including...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-Express News Service&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Bowing to pressure from opposition parties and women&amp;rsquo;s rights organisations, the union cabinet today cleared some more amendments to the Marriage Laws (Amendment) Bill to give women a clearly-defined share in their husband&amp;rsquo;s &amp;ldquo;immovable residential property&amp;rdquo; &amp;mdash; including that acquired before marriage &amp;mdash; in divorce cases.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If passed, the amended Bill would allow &amp;ldquo;equal share of residential property&amp;rdquo; to the wife and children. The wife&amp;rsquo;s share will be decided by the courts, &amp;ldquo;considering her living standards&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The cabinet, however, decided to retain the mandatory six-month cooling-off period, which the Bill had proposed to do away with in case of divorce with mutual consent. But the cooling-off period can be waived if the divorce application is &amp;ldquo;made by both the parties instead of either of the parties&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;On an application being made by both the parties, the court may reduce the period specified under sub-section 2 of Section 13B to a lesser period and may waive off the requirement for moving the motion by both the parties if it is satisfied that the parties to the marriage are not in a position to reconcile their differences,&amp;rdquo; says the proposed amendment.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As per the latest amendments, while a wife would now be eligible to oppose a husband&amp;rsquo;s plea for divorce under the new &amp;ldquo;irretrievable breakdown of marriage&amp;rdquo; clause, the husband shall not have such a right if the wife moves the court on the same grounds.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On April 30, when Union Law Minister Salman Khurshid introduced the Bill, which, among other things, proposed to include &amp;ldquo;irretrievable breakdown of marriage&amp;rsquo;&amp;rsquo; as one of the grounds for grant of divorce, he faced stiff opposition from the BJP.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Speaking in the RS, Leader of the Opposition Arun Jaitley had said that unless the matter of sharing assets was considered seriously, the proposed changes could be misused against the women. He had also pointed out that countries which allowed for irretrievable breakdown as a ground for divorce have a strong support system for the wife and children.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Law Ministry Bill also seeks to amend the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and the Special Marriage Act, 1954.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/cabinet-clears-change-in-divorce-law-women-to-get-part-of-husbands-property-15219.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Cabinet clears change in divorce law: Women to get part of husband’s property | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-Express News Service

Bowing to pressure from opposition parties and women&rsquo;s rights organisations, the union cabinet today cleared some more amendments to the Marriage Laws (Amendment) Bill to give women a clearly-defined share in their husband&rsquo;s &ldquo;immovable residential property&rdquo; &mdash; including..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Cabinet clears change in divorce law: Women to get part of husband’s property</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-Express News Service<br /><br />Bowing to pressure from opposition parties and women&rsquo;s rights organisations, the union cabinet today cleared some more amendments to the Marriage Laws (Amendment) Bill to give women a clearly-defined share in their husband&rsquo;s &ldquo;immovable residential property&rdquo; &mdash; including that acquired before marriage &mdash; in divorce cases.<br /><br />If passed, the amended Bill would allow &ldquo;equal share of residential property&rdquo; to the wife and children. The wife&rsquo;s share will be decided by the courts, &ldquo;considering her living standards&rdquo;.<br /><br />The cabinet, however, decided to retain the mandatory six-month cooling-off period, which the Bill had proposed to do away with in case of divorce with mutual consent. But the cooling-off period can be waived if the divorce application is &ldquo;made by both the parties instead of either of the parties&rdquo;.<br /><br />&ldquo;On an application being made by both the parties, the court may reduce the period specified under sub-section 2 of Section 13B to a lesser period and may waive off the requirement for moving the motion by both the parties if it is satisfied that the parties to the marriage are not in a position to reconcile their differences,&rdquo; says the proposed amendment.<br /><br />As per the latest amendments, while a wife would now be eligible to oppose a husband&rsquo;s plea for divorce under the new &ldquo;irretrievable breakdown of marriage&rdquo; clause, the husband shall not have such a right if the wife moves the court on the same grounds.<br /><br />On April 30, when Union Law Minister Salman Khurshid introduced the Bill, which, among other things, proposed to include &ldquo;irretrievable breakdown of marriage&rsquo;&rsquo; as one of the grounds for grant of divorce, he faced stiff opposition from the BJP.<br /><br />Speaking in the RS, Leader of the Opposition Arun Jaitley had said that unless the matter of sharing assets was considered seriously, the proposed changes could be misused against the women. He had also pointed out that countries which allowed for irretrievable breakdown as a ground for divorce have a strong support system for the wife and children.<br /><br />The Law Ministry Bill also seeks to amend the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and the Special Marriage Act, 1954.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea12f5b8efc-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea12f5b8efc-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67ea12f5b8efc-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea12f5b8efc-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea12f5b8efc-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea12f5b8efc-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67ea12f5b8efc-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67ea12f5b8efc-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67ea12f5b8efc-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 15095,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Cabinet clears change in divorce law: Women to get part of husband’s property&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-Express News Service&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bowing to pressure from opposition parties and women&amp;rsquo;s rights organisations, the union cabinet today cleared some more amendments to the Marriage Laws (Amendment) Bill to give women a clearly-defined share in their husband&amp;rsquo;s &amp;ldquo;immovable residential property&amp;rdquo; &amp;mdash; including that acquired before marriage &amp;mdash; in divorce cases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If passed, the amended Bill would allow &amp;ldquo;equal share of residential property&amp;rdquo; to the wife and children. The wife&amp;rsquo;s share will be decided by the courts, &amp;ldquo;considering her living standards&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The cabinet, however, decided to retain the mandatory six-month cooling-off period, which the Bill had proposed to do away with in case of divorce with mutual consent. But the cooling-off period can be waived if the divorce application is &amp;ldquo;made by both the parties instead of either of the parties&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;On an application being made by both the parties, the court may reduce the period specified under sub-section 2 of Section 13B to a lesser period and may waive off the requirement for moving the motion by both the parties if it is satisfied that the parties to the marriage are not in a position to reconcile their differences,&amp;rdquo; says the proposed amendment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As per the latest amendments, while a wife would now be eligible to oppose a husband&amp;rsquo;s plea for divorce under the new &amp;ldquo;irretrievable breakdown of marriage&amp;rdquo; clause, the husband shall not have such a right if the wife moves the court on the same grounds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On April 30, when Union Law Minister Salman Khurshid introduced the Bill, which, among other things, proposed to include &amp;ldquo;irretrievable breakdown of marriage&amp;rsquo;&amp;rsquo; as one of the grounds for grant of divorce, he faced stiff opposition from the BJP.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Speaking in the RS, Leader of the Opposition Arun Jaitley had said that unless the matter of sharing assets was considered seriously, the proposed changes could be misused against the women. He had also pointed out that countries which allowed for irretrievable breakdown as a ground for divorce have a strong support system for the wife and children.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Law Ministry Bill also seeks to amend the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and the Special Marriage Act, 1954.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 18 May, 2012, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/cabinet-clears-change-in-divorce-law-women-to-get-part-of-husbands-property/950887/0&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;cabinet-clears-change-in-divorce-law-women-to-get-part-of-husbands-property-15219&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 15219,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 15095,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Cabinet clears change in divorce law: Women to get part of husband’s property&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Law and Justice,Gender&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-Express News Service

Bowing to pressure from opposition parties and women&amp;rsquo;s rights organisations, the union cabinet today cleared some more amendments to the Marriage Laws (Amendment) Bill to give women a clearly-defined share in their husband&amp;rsquo;s &amp;ldquo;immovable residential property&amp;rdquo; &amp;mdash; including...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-Express News Service&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Bowing to pressure from opposition parties and women&amp;rsquo;s rights organisations, the union cabinet today cleared some more amendments to the Marriage Laws (Amendment) Bill to give women a clearly-defined share in their husband&amp;rsquo;s &amp;ldquo;immovable residential property&amp;rdquo; &amp;mdash; including that acquired before marriage &amp;mdash; in divorce cases.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If passed, the amended Bill would allow &amp;ldquo;equal share of residential property&amp;rdquo; to the wife and children. The wife&amp;rsquo;s share will be decided by the courts, &amp;ldquo;considering her living standards&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The cabinet, however, decided to retain the mandatory six-month cooling-off period, which the Bill had proposed to do away with in case of divorce with mutual consent. But the cooling-off period can be waived if the divorce application is &amp;ldquo;made by both the parties instead of either of the parties&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;On an application being made by both the parties, the court may reduce the period specified under sub-section 2 of Section 13B to a lesser period and may waive off the requirement for moving the motion by both the parties if it is satisfied that the parties to the marriage are not in a position to reconcile their differences,&amp;rdquo; says the proposed amendment.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As per the latest amendments, while a wife would now be eligible to oppose a husband&amp;rsquo;s plea for divorce under the new &amp;ldquo;irretrievable breakdown of marriage&amp;rdquo; clause, the husband shall not have such a right if the wife moves the court on the same grounds.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On April 30, when Union Law Minister Salman Khurshid introduced the Bill, which, among other things, proposed to include &amp;ldquo;irretrievable breakdown of marriage&amp;rsquo;&amp;rsquo; as one of the grounds for grant of divorce, he faced stiff opposition from the BJP.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Speaking in the RS, Leader of the Opposition Arun Jaitley had said that unless the matter of sharing assets was considered seriously, the proposed changes could be misused against the women. He had also pointed out that countries which allowed for irretrievable breakdown as a ground for divorce have a strong support system for the wife and children.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Law Ministry Bill also seeks to amend the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and the Special Marriage Act, 1954.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 15095,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Cabinet clears change in divorce law: Women to get part of husband’s property&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-Express News Service&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bowing to pressure from opposition parties and women&amp;rsquo;s rights organisations, the union cabinet today cleared some more amendments to the Marriage Laws (Amendment) Bill to give women a clearly-defined share in their husband&amp;rsquo;s &amp;ldquo;immovable residential property&amp;rdquo; &amp;mdash; including that acquired before marriage &amp;mdash; in divorce cases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If passed, the amended Bill would allow &amp;ldquo;equal share of residential property&amp;rdquo; to the wife and children. The wife&amp;rsquo;s share will be decided by the courts, &amp;ldquo;considering her living standards&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The cabinet, however, decided to retain the mandatory six-month cooling-off period, which the Bill had proposed to do away with in case of divorce with mutual consent. But the cooling-off period can be waived if the divorce application is &amp;ldquo;made by both the parties instead of either of the parties&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;On an application being made by both the parties, the court may reduce the period specified under sub-section 2 of Section 13B to a lesser period and may waive off the requirement for moving the motion by both the parties if it is satisfied that the parties to the marriage are not in a position to reconcile their differences,&amp;rdquo; says the proposed amendment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As per the latest amendments, while a wife would now be eligible to oppose a husband&amp;rsquo;s plea for divorce under the new &amp;ldquo;irretrievable breakdown of marriage&amp;rdquo; clause, the husband shall not have such a right if the wife moves the court on the same grounds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On April 30, when Union Law Minister Salman Khurshid introduced the Bill, which, among other things, proposed to include &amp;ldquo;irretrievable breakdown of marriage&amp;rsquo;&amp;rsquo; as one of the grounds for grant of divorce, he faced stiff opposition from the BJP.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Speaking in the RS, Leader of the Opposition Arun Jaitley had said that unless the matter of sharing assets was considered seriously, the proposed changes could be misused against the women. He had also pointed out that countries which allowed for irretrievable breakdown as a ground for divorce have a strong support system for the wife and children.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Law Ministry Bill also seeks to amend the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and the Special Marriage Act, 1954.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 18 May, 2012, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/cabinet-clears-change-in-divorce-law-women-to-get-part-of-husbands-property/950887/0&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;cabinet-clears-change-in-divorce-law-women-to-get-part-of-husbands-property-15219&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 15219,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 15095
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Cabinet clears change in divorce law: Women to get part of husband’s property&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Law and Justice,Gender&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-Express News Service

Bowing to pressure from opposition parties and women&amp;rsquo;s rights organisations, the union cabinet today cleared some more amendments to the Marriage Laws (Amendment) Bill to give women a clearly-defined share in their husband&amp;rsquo;s &amp;ldquo;immovable residential property&amp;rdquo; &amp;mdash; including...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-Express News Service&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Bowing to pressure from opposition parties and women&amp;rsquo;s rights organisations, the union cabinet today cleared some more amendments to the Marriage Laws (Amendment) Bill to give women a clearly-defined share in their husband&amp;rsquo;s &amp;ldquo;immovable residential property&amp;rdquo; &amp;mdash; including that acquired before marriage &amp;mdash; in divorce cases.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If passed, the amended Bill would allow &amp;ldquo;equal share of residential property&amp;rdquo; to the wife and children. The wife&amp;rsquo;s share will be decided by the courts, &amp;ldquo;considering her living standards&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The cabinet, however, decided to retain the mandatory six-month cooling-off period, which the Bill had proposed to do away with in case of divorce with mutual consent. But the cooling-off period can be waived if the divorce application is &amp;ldquo;made by both the parties instead of either of the parties&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;On an application being made by both the parties, the court may reduce the period specified under sub-section 2 of Section 13B to a lesser period and may waive off the requirement for moving the motion by both the parties if it is satisfied that the parties to the marriage are not in a position to reconcile their differences,&amp;rdquo; says the proposed amendment.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As per the latest amendments, while a wife would now be eligible to oppose a husband&amp;rsquo;s plea for divorce under the new &amp;ldquo;irretrievable breakdown of marriage&amp;rdquo; clause, the husband shall not have such a right if the wife moves the court on the same grounds.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On April 30, when Union Law Minister Salman Khurshid introduced the Bill, which, among other things, proposed to include &amp;ldquo;irretrievable breakdown of marriage&amp;rsquo;&amp;rsquo; as one of the grounds for grant of divorce, he faced stiff opposition from the BJP.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Speaking in the RS, Leader of the Opposition Arun Jaitley had said that unless the matter of sharing assets was considered seriously, the proposed changes could be misused against the women. He had also pointed out that countries which allowed for irretrievable breakdown as a ground for divorce have a strong support system for the wife and children.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Law Ministry Bill also seeks to amend the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and the Special Marriage Act, 1954.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/cabinet-clears-change-in-divorce-law-women-to-get-part-of-husbands-property-15219.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Cabinet clears change in divorce law: Women to get part of husband’s property | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-Express News Service

Bowing to pressure from opposition parties and women&rsquo;s rights organisations, the union cabinet today cleared some more amendments to the Marriage Laws (Amendment) Bill to give women a clearly-defined share in their husband&rsquo;s &ldquo;immovable residential property&rdquo; &mdash; including..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Cabinet clears change in divorce law: Women to get part of husband’s property</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-Express News Service<br /><br />Bowing to pressure from opposition parties and women&rsquo;s rights organisations, the union cabinet today cleared some more amendments to the Marriage Laws (Amendment) Bill to give women a clearly-defined share in their husband&rsquo;s &ldquo;immovable residential property&rdquo; &mdash; including that acquired before marriage &mdash; in divorce cases.<br /><br />If passed, the amended Bill would allow &ldquo;equal share of residential property&rdquo; to the wife and children. The wife&rsquo;s share will be decided by the courts, &ldquo;considering her living standards&rdquo;.<br /><br />The cabinet, however, decided to retain the mandatory six-month cooling-off period, which the Bill had proposed to do away with in case of divorce with mutual consent. But the cooling-off period can be waived if the divorce application is &ldquo;made by both the parties instead of either of the parties&rdquo;.<br /><br />&ldquo;On an application being made by both the parties, the court may reduce the period specified under sub-section 2 of Section 13B to a lesser period and may waive off the requirement for moving the motion by both the parties if it is satisfied that the parties to the marriage are not in a position to reconcile their differences,&rdquo; says the proposed amendment.<br /><br />As per the latest amendments, while a wife would now be eligible to oppose a husband&rsquo;s plea for divorce under the new &ldquo;irretrievable breakdown of marriage&rdquo; clause, the husband shall not have such a right if the wife moves the court on the same grounds.<br /><br />On April 30, when Union Law Minister Salman Khurshid introduced the Bill, which, among other things, proposed to include &ldquo;irretrievable breakdown of marriage&rsquo;&rsquo; as one of the grounds for grant of divorce, he faced stiff opposition from the BJP.<br /><br />Speaking in the RS, Leader of the Opposition Arun Jaitley had said that unless the matter of sharing assets was considered seriously, the proposed changes could be misused against the women. He had also pointed out that countries which allowed for irretrievable breakdown as a ground for divorce have a strong support system for the wife and children.<br /><br />The Law Ministry Bill also seeks to amend the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and the Special Marriage Act, 1954.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 15095,
		'title' => 'Cabinet clears change in divorce law: Women to get part of husband’s property',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<div align="justify">
-Express News Service<br />
<br />
Bowing to pressure from opposition parties and women&rsquo;s rights organisations, the union cabinet today cleared some more amendments to the Marriage Laws (Amendment) Bill to give women a clearly-defined share in their husband&rsquo;s &ldquo;immovable residential property&rdquo; &mdash; including that acquired before marriage &mdash; in divorce cases.<br />
<br />
If passed, the amended Bill would allow &ldquo;equal share of residential property&rdquo; to the wife and children. The wife&rsquo;s share will be decided by the courts, &ldquo;considering her living standards&rdquo;.<br />
<br />
The cabinet, however, decided to retain the mandatory six-month cooling-off period, which the Bill had proposed to do away with in case of divorce with mutual consent. But the cooling-off period can be waived if the divorce application is &ldquo;made by both the parties instead of either of the parties&rdquo;.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;On an application being made by both the parties, the court may reduce the period specified under sub-section 2 of Section 13B to a lesser period and may waive off the requirement for moving the motion by both the parties if it is satisfied that the parties to the marriage are not in a position to reconcile their differences,&rdquo; says the proposed amendment.<br />
<br />
As per the latest amendments, while a wife would now be eligible to oppose a husband&rsquo;s plea for divorce under the new &ldquo;irretrievable breakdown of marriage&rdquo; clause, the husband shall not have such a right if the wife moves the court on the same grounds.<br />
<br />
On April 30, when Union Law Minister Salman Khurshid introduced the Bill, which, among other things, proposed to include &ldquo;irretrievable breakdown of marriage&rsquo;&rsquo; as one of the grounds for grant of divorce, he faced stiff opposition from the BJP.<br />
<br />
Speaking in the RS, Leader of the Opposition Arun Jaitley had said that unless the matter of sharing assets was considered seriously, the proposed changes could be misused against the women. He had also pointed out that countries which allowed for irretrievable breakdown as a ground for divorce have a strong support system for the wife and children.<br />
<br />
The Law Ministry Bill also seeks to amend the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and the Special Marriage Act, 1954.
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 18 May, 2012, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/cabinet-clears-change-in-divorce-law-women-to-get-part-of-husbands-property/950887/0',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'cabinet-clears-change-in-divorce-law-women-to-get-part-of-husbands-property-15219',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 15219,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 15095,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Cabinet clears change in divorce law: Women to get part of husband’s property',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Law and Justice,Gender',
	'metaDesc' => '
-Express News Service

Bowing to pressure from opposition parties and women&rsquo;s rights organisations, the union cabinet today cleared some more amendments to the Marriage Laws (Amendment) Bill to give women a clearly-defined share in their husband&rsquo;s &ldquo;immovable residential property&rdquo; &mdash; including...',
	'disp' => '<div align="justify">-Express News Service<br /><br />Bowing to pressure from opposition parties and women&rsquo;s rights organisations, the union cabinet today cleared some more amendments to the Marriage Laws (Amendment) Bill to give women a clearly-defined share in their husband&rsquo;s &ldquo;immovable residential property&rdquo; &mdash; including that acquired before marriage &mdash; in divorce cases.<br /><br />If passed, the amended Bill would allow &ldquo;equal share of residential property&rdquo; to the wife and children. The wife&rsquo;s share will be decided by the courts, &ldquo;considering her living standards&rdquo;.<br /><br />The cabinet, however, decided to retain the mandatory six-month cooling-off period, which the Bill had proposed to do away with in case of divorce with mutual consent. But the cooling-off period can be waived if the divorce application is &ldquo;made by both the parties instead of either of the parties&rdquo;.<br /><br />&ldquo;On an application being made by both the parties, the court may reduce the period specified under sub-section 2 of Section 13B to a lesser period and may waive off the requirement for moving the motion by both the parties if it is satisfied that the parties to the marriage are not in a position to reconcile their differences,&rdquo; says the proposed amendment.<br /><br />As per the latest amendments, while a wife would now be eligible to oppose a husband&rsquo;s plea for divorce under the new &ldquo;irretrievable breakdown of marriage&rdquo; clause, the husband shall not have such a right if the wife moves the court on the same grounds.<br /><br />On April 30, when Union Law Minister Salman Khurshid introduced the Bill, which, among other things, proposed to include &ldquo;irretrievable breakdown of marriage&rsquo;&rsquo; as one of the grounds for grant of divorce, he faced stiff opposition from the BJP.<br /><br />Speaking in the RS, Leader of the Opposition Arun Jaitley had said that unless the matter of sharing assets was considered seriously, the proposed changes could be misused against the women. He had also pointed out that countries which allowed for irretrievable breakdown as a ground for divorce have a strong support system for the wife and children.<br /><br />The Law Ministry Bill also seeks to amend the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and the Special Marriage Act, 1954.</div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 15095,
	'title' => 'Cabinet clears change in divorce law: Women to get part of husband’s property',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<div align="justify">
-Express News Service<br />
<br />
Bowing to pressure from opposition parties and women&rsquo;s rights organisations, the union cabinet today cleared some more amendments to the Marriage Laws (Amendment) Bill to give women a clearly-defined share in their husband&rsquo;s &ldquo;immovable residential property&rdquo; &mdash; including that acquired before marriage &mdash; in divorce cases.<br />
<br />
If passed, the amended Bill would allow &ldquo;equal share of residential property&rdquo; to the wife and children. The wife&rsquo;s share will be decided by the courts, &ldquo;considering her living standards&rdquo;.<br />
<br />
The cabinet, however, decided to retain the mandatory six-month cooling-off period, which the Bill had proposed to do away with in case of divorce with mutual consent. But the cooling-off period can be waived if the divorce application is &ldquo;made by both the parties instead of either of the parties&rdquo;.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;On an application being made by both the parties, the court may reduce the period specified under sub-section 2 of Section 13B to a lesser period and may waive off the requirement for moving the motion by both the parties if it is satisfied that the parties to the marriage are not in a position to reconcile their differences,&rdquo; says the proposed amendment.<br />
<br />
As per the latest amendments, while a wife would now be eligible to oppose a husband&rsquo;s plea for divorce under the new &ldquo;irretrievable breakdown of marriage&rdquo; clause, the husband shall not have such a right if the wife moves the court on the same grounds.<br />
<br />
On April 30, when Union Law Minister Salman Khurshid introduced the Bill, which, among other things, proposed to include &ldquo;irretrievable breakdown of marriage&rsquo;&rsquo; as one of the grounds for grant of divorce, he faced stiff opposition from the BJP.<br />
<br />
Speaking in the RS, Leader of the Opposition Arun Jaitley had said that unless the matter of sharing assets was considered seriously, the proposed changes could be misused against the women. He had also pointed out that countries which allowed for irretrievable breakdown as a ground for divorce have a strong support system for the wife and children.<br />
<br />
The Law Ministry Bill also seeks to amend the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and the Special Marriage Act, 1954.
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 18 May, 2012, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/cabinet-clears-change-in-divorce-law-women-to-get-part-of-husbands-property/950887/0',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'cabinet-clears-change-in-divorce-law-women-to-get-part-of-husbands-property-15219',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 15219,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 15095
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Cabinet clears change in divorce law: Women to get part of husband’s property'
$metaKeywords = 'Law and Justice,Gender'
$metaDesc = '
-Express News Service

Bowing to pressure from opposition parties and women&rsquo;s rights organisations, the union cabinet today cleared some more amendments to the Marriage Laws (Amendment) Bill to give women a clearly-defined share in their husband&rsquo;s &ldquo;immovable residential property&rdquo; &mdash; including...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-Express News Service<br /><br />Bowing to pressure from opposition parties and women&rsquo;s rights organisations, the union cabinet today cleared some more amendments to the Marriage Laws (Amendment) Bill to give women a clearly-defined share in their husband&rsquo;s &ldquo;immovable residential property&rdquo; &mdash; including that acquired before marriage &mdash; in divorce cases.<br /><br />If passed, the amended Bill would allow &ldquo;equal share of residential property&rdquo; to the wife and children. The wife&rsquo;s share will be decided by the courts, &ldquo;considering her living standards&rdquo;.<br /><br />The cabinet, however, decided to retain the mandatory six-month cooling-off period, which the Bill had proposed to do away with in case of divorce with mutual consent. But the cooling-off period can be waived if the divorce application is &ldquo;made by both the parties instead of either of the parties&rdquo;.<br /><br />&ldquo;On an application being made by both the parties, the court may reduce the period specified under sub-section 2 of Section 13B to a lesser period and may waive off the requirement for moving the motion by both the parties if it is satisfied that the parties to the marriage are not in a position to reconcile their differences,&rdquo; says the proposed amendment.<br /><br />As per the latest amendments, while a wife would now be eligible to oppose a husband&rsquo;s plea for divorce under the new &ldquo;irretrievable breakdown of marriage&rdquo; clause, the husband shall not have such a right if the wife moves the court on the same grounds.<br /><br />On April 30, when Union Law Minister Salman Khurshid introduced the Bill, which, among other things, proposed to include &ldquo;irretrievable breakdown of marriage&rsquo;&rsquo; as one of the grounds for grant of divorce, he faced stiff opposition from the BJP.<br /><br />Speaking in the RS, Leader of the Opposition Arun Jaitley had said that unless the matter of sharing assets was considered seriously, the proposed changes could be misused against the women. He had also pointed out that countries which allowed for irretrievable breakdown as a ground for divorce have a strong support system for the wife and children.<br /><br />The Law Ministry Bill also seeks to amend the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and the Special Marriage Act, 1954.</div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

Cabinet clears change in divorce law: Women to get part of husband’s property

-Express News Service Bowing to pressure from opposition parties and women’s rights organisations, the union cabinet today cleared some more amendments to the Marriage Laws (Amendment) Bill to give women a clearly-defined share in their husband’s “immovable residential property” — including that acquired before marriage — in divorce cases. If passed, the amended Bill would allow “equal share of residential property” to the wife and children. The wife’s share will be decided by the courts, “considering her living standards”. The cabinet, however, decided to retain the mandatory six-month cooling-off period, which the Bill had proposed to do away with in case of divorce with mutual consent. But the cooling-off period can be waived if the divorce application is “made by both the parties instead of either of the parties”. “On an application being made by both the parties, the court may reduce the period specified under sub-section 2 of Section 13B to a lesser period and may waive off the requirement for moving the motion by both the parties if it is satisfied that the parties to the marriage are not in a position to reconcile their differences,” says the proposed amendment. As per the latest amendments, while a wife would now be eligible to oppose a husband’s plea for divorce under the new “irretrievable breakdown of marriage” clause, the husband shall not have such a right if the wife moves the court on the same grounds. On April 30, when Union Law Minister Salman Khurshid introduced the Bill, which, among other things, proposed to include “irretrievable breakdown of marriage’’ as one of the grounds for grant of divorce, he faced stiff opposition from the BJP. Speaking in the RS, Leader of the Opposition Arun Jaitley had said that unless the matter of sharing assets was considered seriously, the proposed changes could be misused against the women. He had also pointed out that countries which allowed for irretrievable breakdown as a ground for divorce have a strong support system for the wife and children. The Law Ministry Bill also seeks to amend the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and the Special Marriage Act, 1954.