Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/cabinet-has-cleared-bill-on-manual-scavenging-court-told-j-venkatesan-16806/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/cabinet-has-cleared-bill-on-manual-scavenging-court-told-j-venkatesan-16806/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/cabinet-has-cleared-bill-on-manual-scavenging-court-told-j-venkatesan-16806/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/cabinet-has-cleared-bill-on-manual-scavenging-court-told-j-venkatesan-16806/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681631034a562-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681631034a562-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr681631034a562-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681631034a562-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681631034a562-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681631034a562-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681631034a562-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr681631034a562-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr681631034a562-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16678,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Cabinet has cleared Bill on manual scavenging, court told -J Venkatesan&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Hindu&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Union government on Monday told the Supreme Court that the Cabinet had cleared the Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and their Rehabilitation Bill, 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On August 24, the court pulled up the government for its callousness in not enacting a law to ban manual scavenging despite repeated assurances that it would come out with law to eliminate this heinous practice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court wanted Additional Solicitor General Harin Raval to take instructions and inform it by today (Monday) whether the Bill would be introduced in this session of Parliament.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the resumed hearing before a Bench of Justices H.L. Dattu and C.K. Prasad, Mr. Raval submitted that the Cabinet approved the Bill within two days of the last date of hearing. Since the affidavit filed on the last hearing was not accepted by the court as it was vague, the Centre filed a fresh one, giving details about the Cabinet approval.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ASG said that as per Article 117(1), the Bill had to be introduced in Parliament on the President&amp;rsquo;s recommendation. He said &amp;ldquo;once the constitutional authority makes the recommendation, the Bill will be laid on the table of the House.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In an apparent reference to the logjam in Parliament on the coal blocks issue, he told the court the Bill could not be introduced if there was no session. Since the current session was due to end on September 7, he wanted the court to post the matter to September 7 so that the correct position would be known by then. The Bench, while appreciating the ASG&amp;rsquo;s efforts in this regard, adjourned the hearing to September 7.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the last hearing, the court drew the Centre&amp;rsquo;s attention to the fact that the matter was pending for over a year and asked the ASG: &amp;ldquo;What action are you taking? This matter has been pending in this court for more than one year. We hear only assurances, but no action seems to have been taken.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bench told the ASG, &amp;ldquo;You are fooling the people. It is really unfortunate that even 65 years after Independence, manual scavenging should continue in this country. The Directive Principles of State Policy [in the Constitution] mandates us to prohibit manual scavenging but you&amp;rsquo;re not serious in introducing appropriate legislation.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bench was hearing an appeal by the Union of India against a June 2011 Madras High Court order, stating that if the Centre failed to amend the law to prevent manual scavenging in two months, the court would be constrained to direct the personal appearance of any of the high dignitaries, be it, from the PMO Secretariat or other departments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the Centre&amp;rsquo;s appeal, the Supreme Court stayed the order and issued notice to respondent A. Narayanan of Virugambakkam, Chennai, on whose PIL the High Court issued the directions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 27 August, 2012, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article3828629.ece?homepage=true&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;cabinet-has-cleared-bill-on-manual-scavenging-court-told-j-venkatesan-16806&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 16806,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 16678,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Cabinet has cleared Bill on manual scavenging, court told -J Venkatesan&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;manual scavenging&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Hindu

The Union government on Monday told the Supreme Court that the Cabinet had cleared the Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and their Rehabilitation Bill, 2012.

On August 24, the court pulled up the government for its callousness in not...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Hindu&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Union government on Monday told the Supreme Court that the Cabinet had cleared the Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and their Rehabilitation Bill, 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On August 24, the court pulled up the government for its callousness in not enacting a law to ban manual scavenging despite repeated assurances that it would come out with law to eliminate this heinous practice.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court wanted Additional Solicitor General Harin Raval to take instructions and inform it by today (Monday) whether the Bill would be introduced in this session of Parliament.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;During the resumed hearing before a Bench of Justices H.L. Dattu and C.K. Prasad, Mr. Raval submitted that the Cabinet approved the Bill within two days of the last date of hearing. Since the affidavit filed on the last hearing was not accepted by the court as it was vague, the Centre filed a fresh one, giving details about the Cabinet approval.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The ASG said that as per Article 117(1), the Bill had to be introduced in Parliament on the President&amp;rsquo;s recommendation. He said &amp;ldquo;once the constitutional authority makes the recommendation, the Bill will be laid on the table of the House.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In an apparent reference to the logjam in Parliament on the coal blocks issue, he told the court the Bill could not be introduced if there was no session. Since the current session was due to end on September 7, he wanted the court to post the matter to September 7 so that the correct position would be known by then. The Bench, while appreciating the ASG&amp;rsquo;s efforts in this regard, adjourned the hearing to September 7.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;At the last hearing, the court drew the Centre&amp;rsquo;s attention to the fact that the matter was pending for over a year and asked the ASG: &amp;ldquo;What action are you taking? This matter has been pending in this court for more than one year. We hear only assurances, but no action seems to have been taken.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Bench told the ASG, &amp;ldquo;You are fooling the people. It is really unfortunate that even 65 years after Independence, manual scavenging should continue in this country. The Directive Principles of State Policy [in the Constitution] mandates us to prohibit manual scavenging but you&amp;rsquo;re not serious in introducing appropriate legislation.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Bench was hearing an appeal by the Union of India against a June 2011 Madras High Court order, stating that if the Centre failed to amend the law to prevent manual scavenging in two months, the court would be constrained to direct the personal appearance of any of the high dignitaries, be it, from the PMO Secretariat or other departments.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On the Centre&amp;rsquo;s appeal, the Supreme Court stayed the order and issued notice to respondent A. Narayanan of Virugambakkam, Chennai, on whose PIL the High Court issued the directions. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16678,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Cabinet has cleared Bill on manual scavenging, court told -J Venkatesan&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Hindu&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Union government on Monday told the Supreme Court that the Cabinet had cleared the Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and their Rehabilitation Bill, 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On August 24, the court pulled up the government for its callousness in not enacting a law to ban manual scavenging despite repeated assurances that it would come out with law to eliminate this heinous practice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court wanted Additional Solicitor General Harin Raval to take instructions and inform it by today (Monday) whether the Bill would be introduced in this session of Parliament.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the resumed hearing before a Bench of Justices H.L. Dattu and C.K. Prasad, Mr. Raval submitted that the Cabinet approved the Bill within two days of the last date of hearing. Since the affidavit filed on the last hearing was not accepted by the court as it was vague, the Centre filed a fresh one, giving details about the Cabinet approval.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ASG said that as per Article 117(1), the Bill had to be introduced in Parliament on the President&amp;rsquo;s recommendation. He said &amp;ldquo;once the constitutional authority makes the recommendation, the Bill will be laid on the table of the House.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In an apparent reference to the logjam in Parliament on the coal blocks issue, he told the court the Bill could not be introduced if there was no session. Since the current session was due to end on September 7, he wanted the court to post the matter to September 7 so that the correct position would be known by then. The Bench, while appreciating the ASG&amp;rsquo;s efforts in this regard, adjourned the hearing to September 7.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the last hearing, the court drew the Centre&amp;rsquo;s attention to the fact that the matter was pending for over a year and asked the ASG: &amp;ldquo;What action are you taking? This matter has been pending in this court for more than one year. We hear only assurances, but no action seems to have been taken.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bench told the ASG, &amp;ldquo;You are fooling the people. It is really unfortunate that even 65 years after Independence, manual scavenging should continue in this country. The Directive Principles of State Policy [in the Constitution] mandates us to prohibit manual scavenging but you&amp;rsquo;re not serious in introducing appropriate legislation.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bench was hearing an appeal by the Union of India against a June 2011 Madras High Court order, stating that if the Centre failed to amend the law to prevent manual scavenging in two months, the court would be constrained to direct the personal appearance of any of the high dignitaries, be it, from the PMO Secretariat or other departments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the Centre&amp;rsquo;s appeal, the Supreme Court stayed the order and issued notice to respondent A. Narayanan of Virugambakkam, Chennai, on whose PIL the High Court issued the directions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 27 August, 2012, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article3828629.ece?homepage=true&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;cabinet-has-cleared-bill-on-manual-scavenging-court-told-j-venkatesan-16806&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 16806,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 16678
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Cabinet has cleared Bill on manual scavenging, court told -J Venkatesan&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;manual scavenging&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Hindu

The Union government on Monday told the Supreme Court that the Cabinet had cleared the Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and their Rehabilitation Bill, 2012.

On August 24, the court pulled up the government for its callousness in not...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Hindu&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Union government on Monday told the Supreme Court that the Cabinet had cleared the Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and their Rehabilitation Bill, 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On August 24, the court pulled up the government for its callousness in not enacting a law to ban manual scavenging despite repeated assurances that it would come out with law to eliminate this heinous practice.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court wanted Additional Solicitor General Harin Raval to take instructions and inform it by today (Monday) whether the Bill would be introduced in this session of Parliament.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;During the resumed hearing before a Bench of Justices H.L. Dattu and C.K. Prasad, Mr. Raval submitted that the Cabinet approved the Bill within two days of the last date of hearing. Since the affidavit filed on the last hearing was not accepted by the court as it was vague, the Centre filed a fresh one, giving details about the Cabinet approval.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The ASG said that as per Article 117(1), the Bill had to be introduced in Parliament on the President&amp;rsquo;s recommendation. He said &amp;ldquo;once the constitutional authority makes the recommendation, the Bill will be laid on the table of the House.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In an apparent reference to the logjam in Parliament on the coal blocks issue, he told the court the Bill could not be introduced if there was no session. Since the current session was due to end on September 7, he wanted the court to post the matter to September 7 so that the correct position would be known by then. The Bench, while appreciating the ASG&amp;rsquo;s efforts in this regard, adjourned the hearing to September 7.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;At the last hearing, the court drew the Centre&amp;rsquo;s attention to the fact that the matter was pending for over a year and asked the ASG: &amp;ldquo;What action are you taking? This matter has been pending in this court for more than one year. We hear only assurances, but no action seems to have been taken.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Bench told the ASG, &amp;ldquo;You are fooling the people. It is really unfortunate that even 65 years after Independence, manual scavenging should continue in this country. The Directive Principles of State Policy [in the Constitution] mandates us to prohibit manual scavenging but you&amp;rsquo;re not serious in introducing appropriate legislation.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Bench was hearing an appeal by the Union of India against a June 2011 Madras High Court order, stating that if the Centre failed to amend the law to prevent manual scavenging in two months, the court would be constrained to direct the personal appearance of any of the high dignitaries, be it, from the PMO Secretariat or other departments.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On the Centre&amp;rsquo;s appeal, the Supreme Court stayed the order and issued notice to respondent A. Narayanan of Virugambakkam, Chennai, on whose PIL the High Court issued the directions. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/cabinet-has-cleared-bill-on-manual-scavenging-court-told-j-venkatesan-16806.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Cabinet has cleared Bill on manual scavenging, court told -J Venkatesan | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Hindu

The Union government on Monday told the Supreme Court that the Cabinet had cleared the Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and their Rehabilitation Bill, 2012.

On August 24, the court pulled up the government for its callousness in not..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Cabinet has cleared Bill on manual scavenging, court told -J Venkatesan</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Hindu<br /><br />The Union government on Monday told the Supreme Court that the Cabinet had cleared the Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and their Rehabilitation Bill, 2012.<br /><br />On August 24, the court pulled up the government for its callousness in not enacting a law to ban manual scavenging despite repeated assurances that it would come out with law to eliminate this heinous practice.<br /><br />The court wanted Additional Solicitor General Harin Raval to take instructions and inform it by today (Monday) whether the Bill would be introduced in this session of Parliament.<br /><br />During the resumed hearing before a Bench of Justices H.L. Dattu and C.K. Prasad, Mr. Raval submitted that the Cabinet approved the Bill within two days of the last date of hearing. Since the affidavit filed on the last hearing was not accepted by the court as it was vague, the Centre filed a fresh one, giving details about the Cabinet approval.<br /><br />The ASG said that as per Article 117(1), the Bill had to be introduced in Parliament on the President&rsquo;s recommendation. He said &ldquo;once the constitutional authority makes the recommendation, the Bill will be laid on the table of the House.&rdquo;<br /><br />In an apparent reference to the logjam in Parliament on the coal blocks issue, he told the court the Bill could not be introduced if there was no session. Since the current session was due to end on September 7, he wanted the court to post the matter to September 7 so that the correct position would be known by then. The Bench, while appreciating the ASG&rsquo;s efforts in this regard, adjourned the hearing to September 7.<br /><br />At the last hearing, the court drew the Centre&rsquo;s attention to the fact that the matter was pending for over a year and asked the ASG: &ldquo;What action are you taking? This matter has been pending in this court for more than one year. We hear only assurances, but no action seems to have been taken.&rdquo;<br /><br />The Bench told the ASG, &ldquo;You are fooling the people. It is really unfortunate that even 65 years after Independence, manual scavenging should continue in this country. The Directive Principles of State Policy [in the Constitution] mandates us to prohibit manual scavenging but you&rsquo;re not serious in introducing appropriate legislation.&rdquo;<br /><br />The Bench was hearing an appeal by the Union of India against a June 2011 Madras High Court order, stating that if the Centre failed to amend the law to prevent manual scavenging in two months, the court would be constrained to direct the personal appearance of any of the high dignitaries, be it, from the PMO Secretariat or other departments.<br /><br />On the Centre&rsquo;s appeal, the Supreme Court stayed the order and issued notice to respondent A. Narayanan of Virugambakkam, Chennai, on whose PIL the High Court issued the directions. <br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681631034a562-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681631034a562-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr681631034a562-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681631034a562-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681631034a562-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681631034a562-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681631034a562-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr681631034a562-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr681631034a562-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16678,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Cabinet has cleared Bill on manual scavenging, court told -J Venkatesan&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Hindu&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Union government on Monday told the Supreme Court that the Cabinet had cleared the Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and their Rehabilitation Bill, 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On August 24, the court pulled up the government for its callousness in not enacting a law to ban manual scavenging despite repeated assurances that it would come out with law to eliminate this heinous practice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court wanted Additional Solicitor General Harin Raval to take instructions and inform it by today (Monday) whether the Bill would be introduced in this session of Parliament.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the resumed hearing before a Bench of Justices H.L. Dattu and C.K. Prasad, Mr. Raval submitted that the Cabinet approved the Bill within two days of the last date of hearing. Since the affidavit filed on the last hearing was not accepted by the court as it was vague, the Centre filed a fresh one, giving details about the Cabinet approval.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ASG said that as per Article 117(1), the Bill had to be introduced in Parliament on the President&amp;rsquo;s recommendation. He said &amp;ldquo;once the constitutional authority makes the recommendation, the Bill will be laid on the table of the House.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In an apparent reference to the logjam in Parliament on the coal blocks issue, he told the court the Bill could not be introduced if there was no session. Since the current session was due to end on September 7, he wanted the court to post the matter to September 7 so that the correct position would be known by then. The Bench, while appreciating the ASG&amp;rsquo;s efforts in this regard, adjourned the hearing to September 7.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the last hearing, the court drew the Centre&amp;rsquo;s attention to the fact that the matter was pending for over a year and asked the ASG: &amp;ldquo;What action are you taking? This matter has been pending in this court for more than one year. We hear only assurances, but no action seems to have been taken.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bench told the ASG, &amp;ldquo;You are fooling the people. It is really unfortunate that even 65 years after Independence, manual scavenging should continue in this country. The Directive Principles of State Policy [in the Constitution] mandates us to prohibit manual scavenging but you&amp;rsquo;re not serious in introducing appropriate legislation.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bench was hearing an appeal by the Union of India against a June 2011 Madras High Court order, stating that if the Centre failed to amend the law to prevent manual scavenging in two months, the court would be constrained to direct the personal appearance of any of the high dignitaries, be it, from the PMO Secretariat or other departments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the Centre&amp;rsquo;s appeal, the Supreme Court stayed the order and issued notice to respondent A. Narayanan of Virugambakkam, Chennai, on whose PIL the High Court issued the directions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 27 August, 2012, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article3828629.ece?homepage=true&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;cabinet-has-cleared-bill-on-manual-scavenging-court-told-j-venkatesan-16806&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 16806,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 16678,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Cabinet has cleared Bill on manual scavenging, court told -J Venkatesan&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;manual scavenging&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Hindu

The Union government on Monday told the Supreme Court that the Cabinet had cleared the Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and their Rehabilitation Bill, 2012.

On August 24, the court pulled up the government for its callousness in not...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Hindu&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Union government on Monday told the Supreme Court that the Cabinet had cleared the Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and their Rehabilitation Bill, 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On August 24, the court pulled up the government for its callousness in not enacting a law to ban manual scavenging despite repeated assurances that it would come out with law to eliminate this heinous practice.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court wanted Additional Solicitor General Harin Raval to take instructions and inform it by today (Monday) whether the Bill would be introduced in this session of Parliament.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;During the resumed hearing before a Bench of Justices H.L. Dattu and C.K. Prasad, Mr. Raval submitted that the Cabinet approved the Bill within two days of the last date of hearing. Since the affidavit filed on the last hearing was not accepted by the court as it was vague, the Centre filed a fresh one, giving details about the Cabinet approval.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The ASG said that as per Article 117(1), the Bill had to be introduced in Parliament on the President&amp;rsquo;s recommendation. He said &amp;ldquo;once the constitutional authority makes the recommendation, the Bill will be laid on the table of the House.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In an apparent reference to the logjam in Parliament on the coal blocks issue, he told the court the Bill could not be introduced if there was no session. Since the current session was due to end on September 7, he wanted the court to post the matter to September 7 so that the correct position would be known by then. The Bench, while appreciating the ASG&amp;rsquo;s efforts in this regard, adjourned the hearing to September 7.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;At the last hearing, the court drew the Centre&amp;rsquo;s attention to the fact that the matter was pending for over a year and asked the ASG: &amp;ldquo;What action are you taking? This matter has been pending in this court for more than one year. We hear only assurances, but no action seems to have been taken.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Bench told the ASG, &amp;ldquo;You are fooling the people. It is really unfortunate that even 65 years after Independence, manual scavenging should continue in this country. The Directive Principles of State Policy [in the Constitution] mandates us to prohibit manual scavenging but you&amp;rsquo;re not serious in introducing appropriate legislation.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Bench was hearing an appeal by the Union of India against a June 2011 Madras High Court order, stating that if the Centre failed to amend the law to prevent manual scavenging in two months, the court would be constrained to direct the personal appearance of any of the high dignitaries, be it, from the PMO Secretariat or other departments.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On the Centre&amp;rsquo;s appeal, the Supreme Court stayed the order and issued notice to respondent A. Narayanan of Virugambakkam, Chennai, on whose PIL the High Court issued the directions. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16678,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Cabinet has cleared Bill on manual scavenging, court told -J Venkatesan&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Hindu&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Union government on Monday told the Supreme Court that the Cabinet had cleared the Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and their Rehabilitation Bill, 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On August 24, the court pulled up the government for its callousness in not enacting a law to ban manual scavenging despite repeated assurances that it would come out with law to eliminate this heinous practice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court wanted Additional Solicitor General Harin Raval to take instructions and inform it by today (Monday) whether the Bill would be introduced in this session of Parliament.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the resumed hearing before a Bench of Justices H.L. Dattu and C.K. Prasad, Mr. Raval submitted that the Cabinet approved the Bill within two days of the last date of hearing. Since the affidavit filed on the last hearing was not accepted by the court as it was vague, the Centre filed a fresh one, giving details about the Cabinet approval.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ASG said that as per Article 117(1), the Bill had to be introduced in Parliament on the President&amp;rsquo;s recommendation. He said &amp;ldquo;once the constitutional authority makes the recommendation, the Bill will be laid on the table of the House.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In an apparent reference to the logjam in Parliament on the coal blocks issue, he told the court the Bill could not be introduced if there was no session. Since the current session was due to end on September 7, he wanted the court to post the matter to September 7 so that the correct position would be known by then. The Bench, while appreciating the ASG&amp;rsquo;s efforts in this regard, adjourned the hearing to September 7.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the last hearing, the court drew the Centre&amp;rsquo;s attention to the fact that the matter was pending for over a year and asked the ASG: &amp;ldquo;What action are you taking? This matter has been pending in this court for more than one year. We hear only assurances, but no action seems to have been taken.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bench told the ASG, &amp;ldquo;You are fooling the people. It is really unfortunate that even 65 years after Independence, manual scavenging should continue in this country. The Directive Principles of State Policy [in the Constitution] mandates us to prohibit manual scavenging but you&amp;rsquo;re not serious in introducing appropriate legislation.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bench was hearing an appeal by the Union of India against a June 2011 Madras High Court order, stating that if the Centre failed to amend the law to prevent manual scavenging in two months, the court would be constrained to direct the personal appearance of any of the high dignitaries, be it, from the PMO Secretariat or other departments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the Centre&amp;rsquo;s appeal, the Supreme Court stayed the order and issued notice to respondent A. Narayanan of Virugambakkam, Chennai, on whose PIL the High Court issued the directions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 27 August, 2012, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article3828629.ece?homepage=true&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;cabinet-has-cleared-bill-on-manual-scavenging-court-told-j-venkatesan-16806&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 16806,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 16678
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Cabinet has cleared Bill on manual scavenging, court told -J Venkatesan&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;manual scavenging&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Hindu

The Union government on Monday told the Supreme Court that the Cabinet had cleared the Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and their Rehabilitation Bill, 2012.

On August 24, the court pulled up the government for its callousness in not...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Hindu&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Union government on Monday told the Supreme Court that the Cabinet had cleared the Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and their Rehabilitation Bill, 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On August 24, the court pulled up the government for its callousness in not enacting a law to ban manual scavenging despite repeated assurances that it would come out with law to eliminate this heinous practice.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court wanted Additional Solicitor General Harin Raval to take instructions and inform it by today (Monday) whether the Bill would be introduced in this session of Parliament.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;During the resumed hearing before a Bench of Justices H.L. Dattu and C.K. Prasad, Mr. Raval submitted that the Cabinet approved the Bill within two days of the last date of hearing. Since the affidavit filed on the last hearing was not accepted by the court as it was vague, the Centre filed a fresh one, giving details about the Cabinet approval.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The ASG said that as per Article 117(1), the Bill had to be introduced in Parliament on the President&amp;rsquo;s recommendation. He said &amp;ldquo;once the constitutional authority makes the recommendation, the Bill will be laid on the table of the House.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In an apparent reference to the logjam in Parliament on the coal blocks issue, he told the court the Bill could not be introduced if there was no session. Since the current session was due to end on September 7, he wanted the court to post the matter to September 7 so that the correct position would be known by then. The Bench, while appreciating the ASG&amp;rsquo;s efforts in this regard, adjourned the hearing to September 7.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;At the last hearing, the court drew the Centre&amp;rsquo;s attention to the fact that the matter was pending for over a year and asked the ASG: &amp;ldquo;What action are you taking? This matter has been pending in this court for more than one year. We hear only assurances, but no action seems to have been taken.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Bench told the ASG, &amp;ldquo;You are fooling the people. It is really unfortunate that even 65 years after Independence, manual scavenging should continue in this country. The Directive Principles of State Policy [in the Constitution] mandates us to prohibit manual scavenging but you&amp;rsquo;re not serious in introducing appropriate legislation.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Bench was hearing an appeal by the Union of India against a June 2011 Madras High Court order, stating that if the Centre failed to amend the law to prevent manual scavenging in two months, the court would be constrained to direct the personal appearance of any of the high dignitaries, be it, from the PMO Secretariat or other departments.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On the Centre&amp;rsquo;s appeal, the Supreme Court stayed the order and issued notice to respondent A. Narayanan of Virugambakkam, Chennai, on whose PIL the High Court issued the directions. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/cabinet-has-cleared-bill-on-manual-scavenging-court-told-j-venkatesan-16806.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Cabinet has cleared Bill on manual scavenging, court told -J Venkatesan | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Hindu

The Union government on Monday told the Supreme Court that the Cabinet had cleared the Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and their Rehabilitation Bill, 2012.

On August 24, the court pulled up the government for its callousness in not..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Cabinet has cleared Bill on manual scavenging, court told -J Venkatesan</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Hindu<br /><br />The Union government on Monday told the Supreme Court that the Cabinet had cleared the Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and their Rehabilitation Bill, 2012.<br /><br />On August 24, the court pulled up the government for its callousness in not enacting a law to ban manual scavenging despite repeated assurances that it would come out with law to eliminate this heinous practice.<br /><br />The court wanted Additional Solicitor General Harin Raval to take instructions and inform it by today (Monday) whether the Bill would be introduced in this session of Parliament.<br /><br />During the resumed hearing before a Bench of Justices H.L. Dattu and C.K. Prasad, Mr. Raval submitted that the Cabinet approved the Bill within two days of the last date of hearing. Since the affidavit filed on the last hearing was not accepted by the court as it was vague, the Centre filed a fresh one, giving details about the Cabinet approval.<br /><br />The ASG said that as per Article 117(1), the Bill had to be introduced in Parliament on the President&rsquo;s recommendation. He said &ldquo;once the constitutional authority makes the recommendation, the Bill will be laid on the table of the House.&rdquo;<br /><br />In an apparent reference to the logjam in Parliament on the coal blocks issue, he told the court the Bill could not be introduced if there was no session. Since the current session was due to end on September 7, he wanted the court to post the matter to September 7 so that the correct position would be known by then. The Bench, while appreciating the ASG&rsquo;s efforts in this regard, adjourned the hearing to September 7.<br /><br />At the last hearing, the court drew the Centre&rsquo;s attention to the fact that the matter was pending for over a year and asked the ASG: &ldquo;What action are you taking? This matter has been pending in this court for more than one year. We hear only assurances, but no action seems to have been taken.&rdquo;<br /><br />The Bench told the ASG, &ldquo;You are fooling the people. It is really unfortunate that even 65 years after Independence, manual scavenging should continue in this country. The Directive Principles of State Policy [in the Constitution] mandates us to prohibit manual scavenging but you&rsquo;re not serious in introducing appropriate legislation.&rdquo;<br /><br />The Bench was hearing an appeal by the Union of India against a June 2011 Madras High Court order, stating that if the Centre failed to amend the law to prevent manual scavenging in two months, the court would be constrained to direct the personal appearance of any of the high dignitaries, be it, from the PMO Secretariat or other departments.<br /><br />On the Centre&rsquo;s appeal, the Supreme Court stayed the order and issued notice to respondent A. Narayanan of Virugambakkam, Chennai, on whose PIL the High Court issued the directions. <br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681631034a562-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681631034a562-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr681631034a562-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681631034a562-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681631034a562-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr681631034a562-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr681631034a562-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr681631034a562-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr681631034a562-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16678,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Cabinet has cleared Bill on manual scavenging, court told -J Venkatesan&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Hindu&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Union government on Monday told the Supreme Court that the Cabinet had cleared the Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and their Rehabilitation Bill, 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On August 24, the court pulled up the government for its callousness in not enacting a law to ban manual scavenging despite repeated assurances that it would come out with law to eliminate this heinous practice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court wanted Additional Solicitor General Harin Raval to take instructions and inform it by today (Monday) whether the Bill would be introduced in this session of Parliament.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the resumed hearing before a Bench of Justices H.L. Dattu and C.K. Prasad, Mr. Raval submitted that the Cabinet approved the Bill within two days of the last date of hearing. Since the affidavit filed on the last hearing was not accepted by the court as it was vague, the Centre filed a fresh one, giving details about the Cabinet approval.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ASG said that as per Article 117(1), the Bill had to be introduced in Parliament on the President&amp;rsquo;s recommendation. He said &amp;ldquo;once the constitutional authority makes the recommendation, the Bill will be laid on the table of the House.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In an apparent reference to the logjam in Parliament on the coal blocks issue, he told the court the Bill could not be introduced if there was no session. Since the current session was due to end on September 7, he wanted the court to post the matter to September 7 so that the correct position would be known by then. The Bench, while appreciating the ASG&amp;rsquo;s efforts in this regard, adjourned the hearing to September 7.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the last hearing, the court drew the Centre&amp;rsquo;s attention to the fact that the matter was pending for over a year and asked the ASG: &amp;ldquo;What action are you taking? This matter has been pending in this court for more than one year. We hear only assurances, but no action seems to have been taken.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bench told the ASG, &amp;ldquo;You are fooling the people. It is really unfortunate that even 65 years after Independence, manual scavenging should continue in this country. The Directive Principles of State Policy [in the Constitution] mandates us to prohibit manual scavenging but you&amp;rsquo;re not serious in introducing appropriate legislation.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bench was hearing an appeal by the Union of India against a June 2011 Madras High Court order, stating that if the Centre failed to amend the law to prevent manual scavenging in two months, the court would be constrained to direct the personal appearance of any of the high dignitaries, be it, from the PMO Secretariat or other departments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the Centre&amp;rsquo;s appeal, the Supreme Court stayed the order and issued notice to respondent A. Narayanan of Virugambakkam, Chennai, on whose PIL the High Court issued the directions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 27 August, 2012, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article3828629.ece?homepage=true&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;cabinet-has-cleared-bill-on-manual-scavenging-court-told-j-venkatesan-16806&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 16806,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 16678,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Cabinet has cleared Bill on manual scavenging, court told -J Venkatesan&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;manual scavenging&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Hindu

The Union government on Monday told the Supreme Court that the Cabinet had cleared the Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and their Rehabilitation Bill, 2012.

On August 24, the court pulled up the government for its callousness in not...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Hindu&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Union government on Monday told the Supreme Court that the Cabinet had cleared the Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and their Rehabilitation Bill, 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On August 24, the court pulled up the government for its callousness in not enacting a law to ban manual scavenging despite repeated assurances that it would come out with law to eliminate this heinous practice.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court wanted Additional Solicitor General Harin Raval to take instructions and inform it by today (Monday) whether the Bill would be introduced in this session of Parliament.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;During the resumed hearing before a Bench of Justices H.L. Dattu and C.K. Prasad, Mr. Raval submitted that the Cabinet approved the Bill within two days of the last date of hearing. Since the affidavit filed on the last hearing was not accepted by the court as it was vague, the Centre filed a fresh one, giving details about the Cabinet approval.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The ASG said that as per Article 117(1), the Bill had to be introduced in Parliament on the President&amp;rsquo;s recommendation. He said &amp;ldquo;once the constitutional authority makes the recommendation, the Bill will be laid on the table of the House.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In an apparent reference to the logjam in Parliament on the coal blocks issue, he told the court the Bill could not be introduced if there was no session. Since the current session was due to end on September 7, he wanted the court to post the matter to September 7 so that the correct position would be known by then. The Bench, while appreciating the ASG&amp;rsquo;s efforts in this regard, adjourned the hearing to September 7.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;At the last hearing, the court drew the Centre&amp;rsquo;s attention to the fact that the matter was pending for over a year and asked the ASG: &amp;ldquo;What action are you taking? This matter has been pending in this court for more than one year. We hear only assurances, but no action seems to have been taken.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Bench told the ASG, &amp;ldquo;You are fooling the people. It is really unfortunate that even 65 years after Independence, manual scavenging should continue in this country. The Directive Principles of State Policy [in the Constitution] mandates us to prohibit manual scavenging but you&amp;rsquo;re not serious in introducing appropriate legislation.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Bench was hearing an appeal by the Union of India against a June 2011 Madras High Court order, stating that if the Centre failed to amend the law to prevent manual scavenging in two months, the court would be constrained to direct the personal appearance of any of the high dignitaries, be it, from the PMO Secretariat or other departments.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On the Centre&amp;rsquo;s appeal, the Supreme Court stayed the order and issued notice to respondent A. Narayanan of Virugambakkam, Chennai, on whose PIL the High Court issued the directions. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16678,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Cabinet has cleared Bill on manual scavenging, court told -J Venkatesan&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Hindu&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Union government on Monday told the Supreme Court that the Cabinet had cleared the Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and their Rehabilitation Bill, 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On August 24, the court pulled up the government for its callousness in not enacting a law to ban manual scavenging despite repeated assurances that it would come out with law to eliminate this heinous practice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court wanted Additional Solicitor General Harin Raval to take instructions and inform it by today (Monday) whether the Bill would be introduced in this session of Parliament.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the resumed hearing before a Bench of Justices H.L. Dattu and C.K. Prasad, Mr. Raval submitted that the Cabinet approved the Bill within two days of the last date of hearing. Since the affidavit filed on the last hearing was not accepted by the court as it was vague, the Centre filed a fresh one, giving details about the Cabinet approval.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ASG said that as per Article 117(1), the Bill had to be introduced in Parliament on the President&amp;rsquo;s recommendation. He said &amp;ldquo;once the constitutional authority makes the recommendation, the Bill will be laid on the table of the House.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In an apparent reference to the logjam in Parliament on the coal blocks issue, he told the court the Bill could not be introduced if there was no session. Since the current session was due to end on September 7, he wanted the court to post the matter to September 7 so that the correct position would be known by then. The Bench, while appreciating the ASG&amp;rsquo;s efforts in this regard, adjourned the hearing to September 7.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the last hearing, the court drew the Centre&amp;rsquo;s attention to the fact that the matter was pending for over a year and asked the ASG: &amp;ldquo;What action are you taking? This matter has been pending in this court for more than one year. We hear only assurances, but no action seems to have been taken.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bench told the ASG, &amp;ldquo;You are fooling the people. It is really unfortunate that even 65 years after Independence, manual scavenging should continue in this country. The Directive Principles of State Policy [in the Constitution] mandates us to prohibit manual scavenging but you&amp;rsquo;re not serious in introducing appropriate legislation.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bench was hearing an appeal by the Union of India against a June 2011 Madras High Court order, stating that if the Centre failed to amend the law to prevent manual scavenging in two months, the court would be constrained to direct the personal appearance of any of the high dignitaries, be it, from the PMO Secretariat or other departments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the Centre&amp;rsquo;s appeal, the Supreme Court stayed the order and issued notice to respondent A. Narayanan of Virugambakkam, Chennai, on whose PIL the High Court issued the directions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Hindu, 27 August, 2012, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article3828629.ece?homepage=true&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;cabinet-has-cleared-bill-on-manual-scavenging-court-told-j-venkatesan-16806&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 16806,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 16678
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Cabinet has cleared Bill on manual scavenging, court told -J Venkatesan&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;manual scavenging&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Hindu

The Union government on Monday told the Supreme Court that the Cabinet had cleared the Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and their Rehabilitation Bill, 2012.

On August 24, the court pulled up the government for its callousness in not...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Hindu&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Union government on Monday told the Supreme Court that the Cabinet had cleared the Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and their Rehabilitation Bill, 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On August 24, the court pulled up the government for its callousness in not enacting a law to ban manual scavenging despite repeated assurances that it would come out with law to eliminate this heinous practice.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court wanted Additional Solicitor General Harin Raval to take instructions and inform it by today (Monday) whether the Bill would be introduced in this session of Parliament.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;During the resumed hearing before a Bench of Justices H.L. Dattu and C.K. Prasad, Mr. Raval submitted that the Cabinet approved the Bill within two days of the last date of hearing. Since the affidavit filed on the last hearing was not accepted by the court as it was vague, the Centre filed a fresh one, giving details about the Cabinet approval.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The ASG said that as per Article 117(1), the Bill had to be introduced in Parliament on the President&amp;rsquo;s recommendation. He said &amp;ldquo;once the constitutional authority makes the recommendation, the Bill will be laid on the table of the House.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In an apparent reference to the logjam in Parliament on the coal blocks issue, he told the court the Bill could not be introduced if there was no session. Since the current session was due to end on September 7, he wanted the court to post the matter to September 7 so that the correct position would be known by then. The Bench, while appreciating the ASG&amp;rsquo;s efforts in this regard, adjourned the hearing to September 7.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;At the last hearing, the court drew the Centre&amp;rsquo;s attention to the fact that the matter was pending for over a year and asked the ASG: &amp;ldquo;What action are you taking? This matter has been pending in this court for more than one year. We hear only assurances, but no action seems to have been taken.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Bench told the ASG, &amp;ldquo;You are fooling the people. It is really unfortunate that even 65 years after Independence, manual scavenging should continue in this country. The Directive Principles of State Policy [in the Constitution] mandates us to prohibit manual scavenging but you&amp;rsquo;re not serious in introducing appropriate legislation.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Bench was hearing an appeal by the Union of India against a June 2011 Madras High Court order, stating that if the Centre failed to amend the law to prevent manual scavenging in two months, the court would be constrained to direct the personal appearance of any of the high dignitaries, be it, from the PMO Secretariat or other departments.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On the Centre&amp;rsquo;s appeal, the Supreme Court stayed the order and issued notice to respondent A. Narayanan of Virugambakkam, Chennai, on whose PIL the High Court issued the directions. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/cabinet-has-cleared-bill-on-manual-scavenging-court-told-j-venkatesan-16806.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Cabinet has cleared Bill on manual scavenging, court told -J Venkatesan | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Hindu

The Union government on Monday told the Supreme Court that the Cabinet had cleared the Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and their Rehabilitation Bill, 2012.

On August 24, the court pulled up the government for its callousness in not..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Cabinet has cleared Bill on manual scavenging, court told -J Venkatesan</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Hindu<br /><br />The Union government on Monday told the Supreme Court that the Cabinet had cleared the Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and their Rehabilitation Bill, 2012.<br /><br />On August 24, the court pulled up the government for its callousness in not enacting a law to ban manual scavenging despite repeated assurances that it would come out with law to eliminate this heinous practice.<br /><br />The court wanted Additional Solicitor General Harin Raval to take instructions and inform it by today (Monday) whether the Bill would be introduced in this session of Parliament.<br /><br />During the resumed hearing before a Bench of Justices H.L. Dattu and C.K. Prasad, Mr. Raval submitted that the Cabinet approved the Bill within two days of the last date of hearing. Since the affidavit filed on the last hearing was not accepted by the court as it was vague, the Centre filed a fresh one, giving details about the Cabinet approval.<br /><br />The ASG said that as per Article 117(1), the Bill had to be introduced in Parliament on the President&rsquo;s recommendation. He said &ldquo;once the constitutional authority makes the recommendation, the Bill will be laid on the table of the House.&rdquo;<br /><br />In an apparent reference to the logjam in Parliament on the coal blocks issue, he told the court the Bill could not be introduced if there was no session. Since the current session was due to end on September 7, he wanted the court to post the matter to September 7 so that the correct position would be known by then. The Bench, while appreciating the ASG&rsquo;s efforts in this regard, adjourned the hearing to September 7.<br /><br />At the last hearing, the court drew the Centre&rsquo;s attention to the fact that the matter was pending for over a year and asked the ASG: &ldquo;What action are you taking? This matter has been pending in this court for more than one year. We hear only assurances, but no action seems to have been taken.&rdquo;<br /><br />The Bench told the ASG, &ldquo;You are fooling the people. It is really unfortunate that even 65 years after Independence, manual scavenging should continue in this country. The Directive Principles of State Policy [in the Constitution] mandates us to prohibit manual scavenging but you&rsquo;re not serious in introducing appropriate legislation.&rdquo;<br /><br />The Bench was hearing an appeal by the Union of India against a June 2011 Madras High Court order, stating that if the Centre failed to amend the law to prevent manual scavenging in two months, the court would be constrained to direct the personal appearance of any of the high dignitaries, be it, from the PMO Secretariat or other departments.<br /><br />On the Centre&rsquo;s appeal, the Supreme Court stayed the order and issued notice to respondent A. Narayanan of Virugambakkam, Chennai, on whose PIL the High Court issued the directions. <br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 16678,
		'title' => 'Cabinet has cleared Bill on manual scavenging, court told -J Venkatesan',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Hindu<br />
<br />
The Union government on Monday told the Supreme Court that the Cabinet had cleared the Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and their Rehabilitation Bill, 2012.<br />
<br />
On August 24, the court pulled up the government for its callousness in not enacting a law to ban manual scavenging despite repeated assurances that it would come out with law to eliminate this heinous practice.<br />
<br />
The court wanted Additional Solicitor General Harin Raval to take instructions and inform it by today (Monday) whether the Bill would be introduced in this session of Parliament.<br />
<br />
During the resumed hearing before a Bench of Justices H.L. Dattu and C.K. Prasad, Mr. Raval submitted that the Cabinet approved the Bill within two days of the last date of hearing. Since the affidavit filed on the last hearing was not accepted by the court as it was vague, the Centre filed a fresh one, giving details about the Cabinet approval.<br />
<br />
The ASG said that as per Article 117(1), the Bill had to be introduced in Parliament on the President&rsquo;s recommendation. He said &ldquo;once the constitutional authority makes the recommendation, the Bill will be laid on the table of the House.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
In an apparent reference to the logjam in Parliament on the coal blocks issue, he told the court the Bill could not be introduced if there was no session. Since the current session was due to end on September 7, he wanted the court to post the matter to September 7 so that the correct position would be known by then. The Bench, while appreciating the ASG&rsquo;s efforts in this regard, adjourned the hearing to September 7.<br />
<br />
At the last hearing, the court drew the Centre&rsquo;s attention to the fact that the matter was pending for over a year and asked the ASG: &ldquo;What action are you taking? This matter has been pending in this court for more than one year. We hear only assurances, but no action seems to have been taken.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
The Bench told the ASG, &ldquo;You are fooling the people. It is really unfortunate that even 65 years after Independence, manual scavenging should continue in this country. The Directive Principles of State Policy [in the Constitution] mandates us to prohibit manual scavenging but you&rsquo;re not serious in introducing appropriate legislation.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
The Bench was hearing an appeal by the Union of India against a June 2011 Madras High Court order, stating that if the Centre failed to amend the law to prevent manual scavenging in two months, the court would be constrained to direct the personal appearance of any of the high dignitaries, be it, from the PMO Secretariat or other departments.<br />
<br />
On the Centre&rsquo;s appeal, the Supreme Court stayed the order and issued notice to respondent A. Narayanan of Virugambakkam, Chennai, on whose PIL the High Court issued the directions. <br />
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 27 August, 2012, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article3828629.ece?homepage=true',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'cabinet-has-cleared-bill-on-manual-scavenging-court-told-j-venkatesan-16806',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 16806,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 16678,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Cabinet has cleared Bill on manual scavenging, court told -J Venkatesan',
	'metaKeywords' => 'manual scavenging',
	'metaDesc' => '
-The Hindu

The Union government on Monday told the Supreme Court that the Cabinet had cleared the Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and their Rehabilitation Bill, 2012.

On August 24, the court pulled up the government for its callousness in not...',
	'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Hindu<br /><br />The Union government on Monday told the Supreme Court that the Cabinet had cleared the Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and their Rehabilitation Bill, 2012.<br /><br />On August 24, the court pulled up the government for its callousness in not enacting a law to ban manual scavenging despite repeated assurances that it would come out with law to eliminate this heinous practice.<br /><br />The court wanted Additional Solicitor General Harin Raval to take instructions and inform it by today (Monday) whether the Bill would be introduced in this session of Parliament.<br /><br />During the resumed hearing before a Bench of Justices H.L. Dattu and C.K. Prasad, Mr. Raval submitted that the Cabinet approved the Bill within two days of the last date of hearing. Since the affidavit filed on the last hearing was not accepted by the court as it was vague, the Centre filed a fresh one, giving details about the Cabinet approval.<br /><br />The ASG said that as per Article 117(1), the Bill had to be introduced in Parliament on the President&rsquo;s recommendation. He said &ldquo;once the constitutional authority makes the recommendation, the Bill will be laid on the table of the House.&rdquo;<br /><br />In an apparent reference to the logjam in Parliament on the coal blocks issue, he told the court the Bill could not be introduced if there was no session. Since the current session was due to end on September 7, he wanted the court to post the matter to September 7 so that the correct position would be known by then. The Bench, while appreciating the ASG&rsquo;s efforts in this regard, adjourned the hearing to September 7.<br /><br />At the last hearing, the court drew the Centre&rsquo;s attention to the fact that the matter was pending for over a year and asked the ASG: &ldquo;What action are you taking? This matter has been pending in this court for more than one year. We hear only assurances, but no action seems to have been taken.&rdquo;<br /><br />The Bench told the ASG, &ldquo;You are fooling the people. It is really unfortunate that even 65 years after Independence, manual scavenging should continue in this country. The Directive Principles of State Policy [in the Constitution] mandates us to prohibit manual scavenging but you&rsquo;re not serious in introducing appropriate legislation.&rdquo;<br /><br />The Bench was hearing an appeal by the Union of India against a June 2011 Madras High Court order, stating that if the Centre failed to amend the law to prevent manual scavenging in two months, the court would be constrained to direct the personal appearance of any of the high dignitaries, be it, from the PMO Secretariat or other departments.<br /><br />On the Centre&rsquo;s appeal, the Supreme Court stayed the order and issued notice to respondent A. Narayanan of Virugambakkam, Chennai, on whose PIL the High Court issued the directions. <br /></div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 16678,
	'title' => 'Cabinet has cleared Bill on manual scavenging, court told -J Venkatesan',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Hindu<br />
<br />
The Union government on Monday told the Supreme Court that the Cabinet had cleared the Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and their Rehabilitation Bill, 2012.<br />
<br />
On August 24, the court pulled up the government for its callousness in not enacting a law to ban manual scavenging despite repeated assurances that it would come out with law to eliminate this heinous practice.<br />
<br />
The court wanted Additional Solicitor General Harin Raval to take instructions and inform it by today (Monday) whether the Bill would be introduced in this session of Parliament.<br />
<br />
During the resumed hearing before a Bench of Justices H.L. Dattu and C.K. Prasad, Mr. Raval submitted that the Cabinet approved the Bill within two days of the last date of hearing. Since the affidavit filed on the last hearing was not accepted by the court as it was vague, the Centre filed a fresh one, giving details about the Cabinet approval.<br />
<br />
The ASG said that as per Article 117(1), the Bill had to be introduced in Parliament on the President&rsquo;s recommendation. He said &ldquo;once the constitutional authority makes the recommendation, the Bill will be laid on the table of the House.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
In an apparent reference to the logjam in Parliament on the coal blocks issue, he told the court the Bill could not be introduced if there was no session. Since the current session was due to end on September 7, he wanted the court to post the matter to September 7 so that the correct position would be known by then. The Bench, while appreciating the ASG&rsquo;s efforts in this regard, adjourned the hearing to September 7.<br />
<br />
At the last hearing, the court drew the Centre&rsquo;s attention to the fact that the matter was pending for over a year and asked the ASG: &ldquo;What action are you taking? This matter has been pending in this court for more than one year. We hear only assurances, but no action seems to have been taken.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
The Bench told the ASG, &ldquo;You are fooling the people. It is really unfortunate that even 65 years after Independence, manual scavenging should continue in this country. The Directive Principles of State Policy [in the Constitution] mandates us to prohibit manual scavenging but you&rsquo;re not serious in introducing appropriate legislation.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
The Bench was hearing an appeal by the Union of India against a June 2011 Madras High Court order, stating that if the Centre failed to amend the law to prevent manual scavenging in two months, the court would be constrained to direct the personal appearance of any of the high dignitaries, be it, from the PMO Secretariat or other departments.<br />
<br />
On the Centre&rsquo;s appeal, the Supreme Court stayed the order and issued notice to respondent A. Narayanan of Virugambakkam, Chennai, on whose PIL the High Court issued the directions. <br />
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Hindu, 27 August, 2012, http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article3828629.ece?homepage=true',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'cabinet-has-cleared-bill-on-manual-scavenging-court-told-j-venkatesan-16806',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 16806,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 16678
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Cabinet has cleared Bill on manual scavenging, court told -J Venkatesan'
$metaKeywords = 'manual scavenging'
$metaDesc = '
-The Hindu

The Union government on Monday told the Supreme Court that the Cabinet had cleared the Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and their Rehabilitation Bill, 2012.

On August 24, the court pulled up the government for its callousness in not...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-The Hindu<br /><br />The Union government on Monday told the Supreme Court that the Cabinet had cleared the Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and their Rehabilitation Bill, 2012.<br /><br />On August 24, the court pulled up the government for its callousness in not enacting a law to ban manual scavenging despite repeated assurances that it would come out with law to eliminate this heinous practice.<br /><br />The court wanted Additional Solicitor General Harin Raval to take instructions and inform it by today (Monday) whether the Bill would be introduced in this session of Parliament.<br /><br />During the resumed hearing before a Bench of Justices H.L. Dattu and C.K. Prasad, Mr. Raval submitted that the Cabinet approved the Bill within two days of the last date of hearing. Since the affidavit filed on the last hearing was not accepted by the court as it was vague, the Centre filed a fresh one, giving details about the Cabinet approval.<br /><br />The ASG said that as per Article 117(1), the Bill had to be introduced in Parliament on the President&rsquo;s recommendation. He said &ldquo;once the constitutional authority makes the recommendation, the Bill will be laid on the table of the House.&rdquo;<br /><br />In an apparent reference to the logjam in Parliament on the coal blocks issue, he told the court the Bill could not be introduced if there was no session. Since the current session was due to end on September 7, he wanted the court to post the matter to September 7 so that the correct position would be known by then. The Bench, while appreciating the ASG&rsquo;s efforts in this regard, adjourned the hearing to September 7.<br /><br />At the last hearing, the court drew the Centre&rsquo;s attention to the fact that the matter was pending for over a year and asked the ASG: &ldquo;What action are you taking? This matter has been pending in this court for more than one year. We hear only assurances, but no action seems to have been taken.&rdquo;<br /><br />The Bench told the ASG, &ldquo;You are fooling the people. It is really unfortunate that even 65 years after Independence, manual scavenging should continue in this country. The Directive Principles of State Policy [in the Constitution] mandates us to prohibit manual scavenging but you&rsquo;re not serious in introducing appropriate legislation.&rdquo;<br /><br />The Bench was hearing an appeal by the Union of India against a June 2011 Madras High Court order, stating that if the Centre failed to amend the law to prevent manual scavenging in two months, the court would be constrained to direct the personal appearance of any of the high dignitaries, be it, from the PMO Secretariat or other departments.<br /><br />On the Centre&rsquo;s appeal, the Supreme Court stayed the order and issued notice to respondent A. Narayanan of Virugambakkam, Chennai, on whose PIL the High Court issued the directions. <br /></div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

Cabinet has cleared Bill on manual scavenging, court told -J Venkatesan

-The Hindu The Union government on Monday told the Supreme Court that the Cabinet had cleared the Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and their Rehabilitation Bill, 2012. On August 24, the court pulled up the government for its callousness in not enacting a law to ban manual scavenging despite repeated assurances that it would come out with law to eliminate this heinous practice. The court wanted Additional Solicitor General Harin Raval to take instructions and inform it by today (Monday) whether the Bill would be introduced in this session of Parliament. During the resumed hearing before a Bench of Justices H.L. Dattu and C.K. Prasad, Mr. Raval submitted that the Cabinet approved the Bill within two days of the last date of hearing. Since the affidavit filed on the last hearing was not accepted by the court as it was vague, the Centre filed a fresh one, giving details about the Cabinet approval. The ASG said that as per Article 117(1), the Bill had to be introduced in Parliament on the President’s recommendation. He said “once the constitutional authority makes the recommendation, the Bill will be laid on the table of the House.” In an apparent reference to the logjam in Parliament on the coal blocks issue, he told the court the Bill could not be introduced if there was no session. Since the current session was due to end on September 7, he wanted the court to post the matter to September 7 so that the correct position would be known by then. The Bench, while appreciating the ASG’s efforts in this regard, adjourned the hearing to September 7. At the last hearing, the court drew the Centre’s attention to the fact that the matter was pending for over a year and asked the ASG: “What action are you taking? This matter has been pending in this court for more than one year. We hear only assurances, but no action seems to have been taken.” The Bench told the ASG, “You are fooling the people. It is really unfortunate that even 65 years after Independence, manual scavenging should continue in this country. The Directive Principles of State Policy [in the Constitution] mandates us to prohibit manual scavenging but you’re not serious in introducing appropriate legislation.” The Bench was hearing an appeal by the Union of India against a June 2011 Madras High Court order, stating that if the Centre failed to amend the law to prevent manual scavenging in two months, the court would be constrained to direct the personal appearance of any of the high dignitaries, be it, from the PMO Secretariat or other departments. On the Centre’s appeal, the Supreme Court stayed the order and issued notice to respondent A. Narayanan of Virugambakkam, Chennai, on whose PIL the High Court issued the directions.