Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/cabinet-set-to-scrap-go-ahead-to-rti-changes-17902/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/cabinet-set-to-scrap-go-ahead-to-rti-changes-17902/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/cabinet-set-to-scrap-go-ahead-to-rti-changes-17902/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/cabinet-set-to-scrap-go-ahead-to-rti-changes-17902/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f21da571740-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f21da571740-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f21da571740-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f21da571740-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f21da571740-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f21da571740-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f21da571740-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f21da571740-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f21da571740-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 17773,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Cabinet set to scrap go-ahead to RTI changes&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Indian Express&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More than six years after it gave the go-ahead to amend the RTI Act, 2005 to, among other things, exclude public notings on files by officials from being accessed under the transparency law, the Cabinet is expected to withdraw the move when it meets on Thursday.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sources told The Indian Express that the decision comes after UPA chairperson Sonia Gandhi indicated to the government her opposition to the proposed changes. RTI activists had experts had questioned the logic, with several National Advisory Council (NAC) members like Aruna Roy also criticising the proposed amendments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In July 2006, the Cabinet had cleared the amendments, which has been finalised after many government departments and organisations like the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC). Another amendment cleared by the Cabinet on the demand of the UPSC was aimed at exempting the competitive examination process from the RTI ambit. The proposal was to amend Section 2 (i)(a) of the RTI Act.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, the enabling Bill was never introduced in Parliament due to strong opposition by the activists.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While the government had taken the stand that file notings were exempted under the transparency laws in countries like the US, UK and Australia, the activists had said that there was no need for the amendments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The then Central Information Commissioner O P Kejriwal had also criticised the decision to exclude file notings from the purview of the RTI, saying it would take &amp;ldquo;life out of the law&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, the government is still to take a final decision on amending the Act to safeguard the sensitivity of the office of the Chief Justice of India. Aruna Roy had termed the amendments as an attempt by the government shield corrupt bureaucrats.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Earlier this month, addressing the annual convention of Information Commissioners, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had expressed concern over &amp;ldquo;frivolous and vexatious use of the RTI Act&amp;rdquo;.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 1 November, 2012, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/cabinet-set-to-scrap-goahead-to-rti-changes/1024910/&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;cabinet-set-to-scrap-go-ahead-to-rti-changes-17902&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 17902,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 17773,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Cabinet set to scrap go-ahead to RTI changes&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Right to Information,rti&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Indian Express

More than six years after it gave the go-ahead to amend the RTI Act, 2005 to, among other things, exclude public notings on files by officials from being accessed under the transparency law, the Cabinet is expected to...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Indian Express&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;More than six years after it gave the go-ahead to amend the RTI Act, 2005 to, among other things, exclude public notings on files by officials from being accessed under the transparency law, the Cabinet is expected to withdraw the move when it meets on Thursday.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sources told The Indian Express that the decision comes after UPA chairperson Sonia Gandhi indicated to the government her opposition to the proposed changes. RTI activists had experts had questioned the logic, with several National Advisory Council (NAC) members like Aruna Roy also criticising the proposed amendments.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In July 2006, the Cabinet had cleared the amendments, which has been finalised after many government departments and organisations like the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC). Another amendment cleared by the Cabinet on the demand of the UPSC was aimed at exempting the competitive examination process from the RTI ambit. The proposal was to amend Section 2 (i)(a) of the RTI Act.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, the enabling Bill was never introduced in Parliament due to strong opposition by the activists.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While the government had taken the stand that file notings were exempted under the transparency laws in countries like the US, UK and Australia, the activists had said that there was no need for the amendments.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The then Central Information Commissioner O P Kejriwal had also criticised the decision to exclude file notings from the purview of the RTI, saying it would take &amp;ldquo;life out of the law&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, the government is still to take a final decision on amending the Act to safeguard the sensitivity of the office of the Chief Justice of India. Aruna Roy had termed the amendments as an attempt by the government shield corrupt bureaucrats.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Earlier this month, addressing the annual convention of Information Commissioners, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had expressed concern over &amp;ldquo;frivolous and vexatious use of the RTI Act&amp;rdquo;.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 17773,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Cabinet set to scrap go-ahead to RTI changes&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Indian Express&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More than six years after it gave the go-ahead to amend the RTI Act, 2005 to, among other things, exclude public notings on files by officials from being accessed under the transparency law, the Cabinet is expected to withdraw the move when it meets on Thursday.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sources told The Indian Express that the decision comes after UPA chairperson Sonia Gandhi indicated to the government her opposition to the proposed changes. RTI activists had experts had questioned the logic, with several National Advisory Council (NAC) members like Aruna Roy also criticising the proposed amendments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In July 2006, the Cabinet had cleared the amendments, which has been finalised after many government departments and organisations like the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC). Another amendment cleared by the Cabinet on the demand of the UPSC was aimed at exempting the competitive examination process from the RTI ambit. The proposal was to amend Section 2 (i)(a) of the RTI Act.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, the enabling Bill was never introduced in Parliament due to strong opposition by the activists.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While the government had taken the stand that file notings were exempted under the transparency laws in countries like the US, UK and Australia, the activists had said that there was no need for the amendments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The then Central Information Commissioner O P Kejriwal had also criticised the decision to exclude file notings from the purview of the RTI, saying it would take &amp;ldquo;life out of the law&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, the government is still to take a final decision on amending the Act to safeguard the sensitivity of the office of the Chief Justice of India. Aruna Roy had termed the amendments as an attempt by the government shield corrupt bureaucrats.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Earlier this month, addressing the annual convention of Information Commissioners, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had expressed concern over &amp;ldquo;frivolous and vexatious use of the RTI Act&amp;rdquo;.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 1 November, 2012, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/cabinet-set-to-scrap-goahead-to-rti-changes/1024910/&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;cabinet-set-to-scrap-go-ahead-to-rti-changes-17902&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 17902,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 17773
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Cabinet set to scrap go-ahead to RTI changes&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Right to Information,rti&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Indian Express

More than six years after it gave the go-ahead to amend the RTI Act, 2005 to, among other things, exclude public notings on files by officials from being accessed under the transparency law, the Cabinet is expected to...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Indian Express&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;More than six years after it gave the go-ahead to amend the RTI Act, 2005 to, among other things, exclude public notings on files by officials from being accessed under the transparency law, the Cabinet is expected to withdraw the move when it meets on Thursday.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sources told The Indian Express that the decision comes after UPA chairperson Sonia Gandhi indicated to the government her opposition to the proposed changes. RTI activists had experts had questioned the logic, with several National Advisory Council (NAC) members like Aruna Roy also criticising the proposed amendments.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In July 2006, the Cabinet had cleared the amendments, which has been finalised after many government departments and organisations like the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC). Another amendment cleared by the Cabinet on the demand of the UPSC was aimed at exempting the competitive examination process from the RTI ambit. The proposal was to amend Section 2 (i)(a) of the RTI Act.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, the enabling Bill was never introduced in Parliament due to strong opposition by the activists.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While the government had taken the stand that file notings were exempted under the transparency laws in countries like the US, UK and Australia, the activists had said that there was no need for the amendments.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The then Central Information Commissioner O P Kejriwal had also criticised the decision to exclude file notings from the purview of the RTI, saying it would take &amp;ldquo;life out of the law&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, the government is still to take a final decision on amending the Act to safeguard the sensitivity of the office of the Chief Justice of India. Aruna Roy had termed the amendments as an attempt by the government shield corrupt bureaucrats.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Earlier this month, addressing the annual convention of Information Commissioners, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had expressed concern over &amp;ldquo;frivolous and vexatious use of the RTI Act&amp;rdquo;.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/cabinet-set-to-scrap-go-ahead-to-rti-changes-17902.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Cabinet set to scrap go-ahead to RTI changes | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Indian Express

More than six years after it gave the go-ahead to amend the RTI Act, 2005 to, among other things, exclude public notings on files by officials from being accessed under the transparency law, the Cabinet is expected to..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Cabinet set to scrap go-ahead to RTI changes</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Indian Express<br /><br />More than six years after it gave the go-ahead to amend the RTI Act, 2005 to, among other things, exclude public notings on files by officials from being accessed under the transparency law, the Cabinet is expected to withdraw the move when it meets on Thursday.<br /><br />Sources told The Indian Express that the decision comes after UPA chairperson Sonia Gandhi indicated to the government her opposition to the proposed changes. RTI activists had experts had questioned the logic, with several National Advisory Council (NAC) members like Aruna Roy also criticising the proposed amendments.<br /><br />In July 2006, the Cabinet had cleared the amendments, which has been finalised after many government departments and organisations like the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC). Another amendment cleared by the Cabinet on the demand of the UPSC was aimed at exempting the competitive examination process from the RTI ambit. The proposal was to amend Section 2 (i)(a) of the RTI Act.<br /><br />However, the enabling Bill was never introduced in Parliament due to strong opposition by the activists.<br /><br />While the government had taken the stand that file notings were exempted under the transparency laws in countries like the US, UK and Australia, the activists had said that there was no need for the amendments.<br /><br />The then Central Information Commissioner O P Kejriwal had also criticised the decision to exclude file notings from the purview of the RTI, saying it would take &ldquo;life out of the law&rdquo;.<br /><br />However, the government is still to take a final decision on amending the Act to safeguard the sensitivity of the office of the Chief Justice of India. Aruna Roy had termed the amendments as an attempt by the government shield corrupt bureaucrats.<br /><br />Earlier this month, addressing the annual convention of Information Commissioners, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had expressed concern over &ldquo;frivolous and vexatious use of the RTI Act&rdquo;.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f21da571740-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f21da571740-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f21da571740-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f21da571740-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f21da571740-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f21da571740-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f21da571740-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f21da571740-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f21da571740-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 17773,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Cabinet set to scrap go-ahead to RTI changes&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Indian Express&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More than six years after it gave the go-ahead to amend the RTI Act, 2005 to, among other things, exclude public notings on files by officials from being accessed under the transparency law, the Cabinet is expected to withdraw the move when it meets on Thursday.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sources told The Indian Express that the decision comes after UPA chairperson Sonia Gandhi indicated to the government her opposition to the proposed changes. RTI activists had experts had questioned the logic, with several National Advisory Council (NAC) members like Aruna Roy also criticising the proposed amendments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In July 2006, the Cabinet had cleared the amendments, which has been finalised after many government departments and organisations like the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC). Another amendment cleared by the Cabinet on the demand of the UPSC was aimed at exempting the competitive examination process from the RTI ambit. The proposal was to amend Section 2 (i)(a) of the RTI Act.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, the enabling Bill was never introduced in Parliament due to strong opposition by the activists.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While the government had taken the stand that file notings were exempted under the transparency laws in countries like the US, UK and Australia, the activists had said that there was no need for the amendments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The then Central Information Commissioner O P Kejriwal had also criticised the decision to exclude file notings from the purview of the RTI, saying it would take &amp;ldquo;life out of the law&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, the government is still to take a final decision on amending the Act to safeguard the sensitivity of the office of the Chief Justice of India. Aruna Roy had termed the amendments as an attempt by the government shield corrupt bureaucrats.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Earlier this month, addressing the annual convention of Information Commissioners, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had expressed concern over &amp;ldquo;frivolous and vexatious use of the RTI Act&amp;rdquo;.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 1 November, 2012, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/cabinet-set-to-scrap-goahead-to-rti-changes/1024910/&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;cabinet-set-to-scrap-go-ahead-to-rti-changes-17902&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 17902,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 17773,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Cabinet set to scrap go-ahead to RTI changes&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Right to Information,rti&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Indian Express

More than six years after it gave the go-ahead to amend the RTI Act, 2005 to, among other things, exclude public notings on files by officials from being accessed under the transparency law, the Cabinet is expected to...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Indian Express&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;More than six years after it gave the go-ahead to amend the RTI Act, 2005 to, among other things, exclude public notings on files by officials from being accessed under the transparency law, the Cabinet is expected to withdraw the move when it meets on Thursday.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sources told The Indian Express that the decision comes after UPA chairperson Sonia Gandhi indicated to the government her opposition to the proposed changes. RTI activists had experts had questioned the logic, with several National Advisory Council (NAC) members like Aruna Roy also criticising the proposed amendments.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In July 2006, the Cabinet had cleared the amendments, which has been finalised after many government departments and organisations like the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC). Another amendment cleared by the Cabinet on the demand of the UPSC was aimed at exempting the competitive examination process from the RTI ambit. The proposal was to amend Section 2 (i)(a) of the RTI Act.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, the enabling Bill was never introduced in Parliament due to strong opposition by the activists.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While the government had taken the stand that file notings were exempted under the transparency laws in countries like the US, UK and Australia, the activists had said that there was no need for the amendments.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The then Central Information Commissioner O P Kejriwal had also criticised the decision to exclude file notings from the purview of the RTI, saying it would take &amp;ldquo;life out of the law&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, the government is still to take a final decision on amending the Act to safeguard the sensitivity of the office of the Chief Justice of India. Aruna Roy had termed the amendments as an attempt by the government shield corrupt bureaucrats.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Earlier this month, addressing the annual convention of Information Commissioners, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had expressed concern over &amp;ldquo;frivolous and vexatious use of the RTI Act&amp;rdquo;.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 17773,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Cabinet set to scrap go-ahead to RTI changes&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Indian Express&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More than six years after it gave the go-ahead to amend the RTI Act, 2005 to, among other things, exclude public notings on files by officials from being accessed under the transparency law, the Cabinet is expected to withdraw the move when it meets on Thursday.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sources told The Indian Express that the decision comes after UPA chairperson Sonia Gandhi indicated to the government her opposition to the proposed changes. RTI activists had experts had questioned the logic, with several National Advisory Council (NAC) members like Aruna Roy also criticising the proposed amendments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In July 2006, the Cabinet had cleared the amendments, which has been finalised after many government departments and organisations like the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC). Another amendment cleared by the Cabinet on the demand of the UPSC was aimed at exempting the competitive examination process from the RTI ambit. The proposal was to amend Section 2 (i)(a) of the RTI Act.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, the enabling Bill was never introduced in Parliament due to strong opposition by the activists.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While the government had taken the stand that file notings were exempted under the transparency laws in countries like the US, UK and Australia, the activists had said that there was no need for the amendments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The then Central Information Commissioner O P Kejriwal had also criticised the decision to exclude file notings from the purview of the RTI, saying it would take &amp;ldquo;life out of the law&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, the government is still to take a final decision on amending the Act to safeguard the sensitivity of the office of the Chief Justice of India. Aruna Roy had termed the amendments as an attempt by the government shield corrupt bureaucrats.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Earlier this month, addressing the annual convention of Information Commissioners, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had expressed concern over &amp;ldquo;frivolous and vexatious use of the RTI Act&amp;rdquo;.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 1 November, 2012, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/cabinet-set-to-scrap-goahead-to-rti-changes/1024910/&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;cabinet-set-to-scrap-go-ahead-to-rti-changes-17902&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 17902,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 17773
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Cabinet set to scrap go-ahead to RTI changes&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Right to Information,rti&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Indian Express

More than six years after it gave the go-ahead to amend the RTI Act, 2005 to, among other things, exclude public notings on files by officials from being accessed under the transparency law, the Cabinet is expected to...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Indian Express&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;More than six years after it gave the go-ahead to amend the RTI Act, 2005 to, among other things, exclude public notings on files by officials from being accessed under the transparency law, the Cabinet is expected to withdraw the move when it meets on Thursday.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sources told The Indian Express that the decision comes after UPA chairperson Sonia Gandhi indicated to the government her opposition to the proposed changes. RTI activists had experts had questioned the logic, with several National Advisory Council (NAC) members like Aruna Roy also criticising the proposed amendments.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In July 2006, the Cabinet had cleared the amendments, which has been finalised after many government departments and organisations like the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC). Another amendment cleared by the Cabinet on the demand of the UPSC was aimed at exempting the competitive examination process from the RTI ambit. The proposal was to amend Section 2 (i)(a) of the RTI Act.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, the enabling Bill was never introduced in Parliament due to strong opposition by the activists.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While the government had taken the stand that file notings were exempted under the transparency laws in countries like the US, UK and Australia, the activists had said that there was no need for the amendments.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The then Central Information Commissioner O P Kejriwal had also criticised the decision to exclude file notings from the purview of the RTI, saying it would take &amp;ldquo;life out of the law&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, the government is still to take a final decision on amending the Act to safeguard the sensitivity of the office of the Chief Justice of India. Aruna Roy had termed the amendments as an attempt by the government shield corrupt bureaucrats.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Earlier this month, addressing the annual convention of Information Commissioners, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had expressed concern over &amp;ldquo;frivolous and vexatious use of the RTI Act&amp;rdquo;.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/cabinet-set-to-scrap-go-ahead-to-rti-changes-17902.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Cabinet set to scrap go-ahead to RTI changes | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Indian Express

More than six years after it gave the go-ahead to amend the RTI Act, 2005 to, among other things, exclude public notings on files by officials from being accessed under the transparency law, the Cabinet is expected to..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Cabinet set to scrap go-ahead to RTI changes</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Indian Express<br /><br />More than six years after it gave the go-ahead to amend the RTI Act, 2005 to, among other things, exclude public notings on files by officials from being accessed under the transparency law, the Cabinet is expected to withdraw the move when it meets on Thursday.<br /><br />Sources told The Indian Express that the decision comes after UPA chairperson Sonia Gandhi indicated to the government her opposition to the proposed changes. RTI activists had experts had questioned the logic, with several National Advisory Council (NAC) members like Aruna Roy also criticising the proposed amendments.<br /><br />In July 2006, the Cabinet had cleared the amendments, which has been finalised after many government departments and organisations like the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC). Another amendment cleared by the Cabinet on the demand of the UPSC was aimed at exempting the competitive examination process from the RTI ambit. The proposal was to amend Section 2 (i)(a) of the RTI Act.<br /><br />However, the enabling Bill was never introduced in Parliament due to strong opposition by the activists.<br /><br />While the government had taken the stand that file notings were exempted under the transparency laws in countries like the US, UK and Australia, the activists had said that there was no need for the amendments.<br /><br />The then Central Information Commissioner O P Kejriwal had also criticised the decision to exclude file notings from the purview of the RTI, saying it would take &ldquo;life out of the law&rdquo;.<br /><br />However, the government is still to take a final decision on amending the Act to safeguard the sensitivity of the office of the Chief Justice of India. Aruna Roy had termed the amendments as an attempt by the government shield corrupt bureaucrats.<br /><br />Earlier this month, addressing the annual convention of Information Commissioners, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had expressed concern over &ldquo;frivolous and vexatious use of the RTI Act&rdquo;.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f21da571740-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f21da571740-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f21da571740-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f21da571740-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f21da571740-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f21da571740-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f21da571740-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f21da571740-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f21da571740-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 17773,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Cabinet set to scrap go-ahead to RTI changes&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Indian Express&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More than six years after it gave the go-ahead to amend the RTI Act, 2005 to, among other things, exclude public notings on files by officials from being accessed under the transparency law, the Cabinet is expected to withdraw the move when it meets on Thursday.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sources told The Indian Express that the decision comes after UPA chairperson Sonia Gandhi indicated to the government her opposition to the proposed changes. RTI activists had experts had questioned the logic, with several National Advisory Council (NAC) members like Aruna Roy also criticising the proposed amendments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In July 2006, the Cabinet had cleared the amendments, which has been finalised after many government departments and organisations like the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC). Another amendment cleared by the Cabinet on the demand of the UPSC was aimed at exempting the competitive examination process from the RTI ambit. The proposal was to amend Section 2 (i)(a) of the RTI Act.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, the enabling Bill was never introduced in Parliament due to strong opposition by the activists.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While the government had taken the stand that file notings were exempted under the transparency laws in countries like the US, UK and Australia, the activists had said that there was no need for the amendments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The then Central Information Commissioner O P Kejriwal had also criticised the decision to exclude file notings from the purview of the RTI, saying it would take &amp;ldquo;life out of the law&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, the government is still to take a final decision on amending the Act to safeguard the sensitivity of the office of the Chief Justice of India. Aruna Roy had termed the amendments as an attempt by the government shield corrupt bureaucrats.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Earlier this month, addressing the annual convention of Information Commissioners, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had expressed concern over &amp;ldquo;frivolous and vexatious use of the RTI Act&amp;rdquo;.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 1 November, 2012, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/cabinet-set-to-scrap-goahead-to-rti-changes/1024910/&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;cabinet-set-to-scrap-go-ahead-to-rti-changes-17902&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 17902,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 17773,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Cabinet set to scrap go-ahead to RTI changes&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Right to Information,rti&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Indian Express

More than six years after it gave the go-ahead to amend the RTI Act, 2005 to, among other things, exclude public notings on files by officials from being accessed under the transparency law, the Cabinet is expected to...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Indian Express&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;More than six years after it gave the go-ahead to amend the RTI Act, 2005 to, among other things, exclude public notings on files by officials from being accessed under the transparency law, the Cabinet is expected to withdraw the move when it meets on Thursday.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sources told The Indian Express that the decision comes after UPA chairperson Sonia Gandhi indicated to the government her opposition to the proposed changes. RTI activists had experts had questioned the logic, with several National Advisory Council (NAC) members like Aruna Roy also criticising the proposed amendments.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In July 2006, the Cabinet had cleared the amendments, which has been finalised after many government departments and organisations like the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC). Another amendment cleared by the Cabinet on the demand of the UPSC was aimed at exempting the competitive examination process from the RTI ambit. The proposal was to amend Section 2 (i)(a) of the RTI Act.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, the enabling Bill was never introduced in Parliament due to strong opposition by the activists.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While the government had taken the stand that file notings were exempted under the transparency laws in countries like the US, UK and Australia, the activists had said that there was no need for the amendments.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The then Central Information Commissioner O P Kejriwal had also criticised the decision to exclude file notings from the purview of the RTI, saying it would take &amp;ldquo;life out of the law&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, the government is still to take a final decision on amending the Act to safeguard the sensitivity of the office of the Chief Justice of India. Aruna Roy had termed the amendments as an attempt by the government shield corrupt bureaucrats.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Earlier this month, addressing the annual convention of Information Commissioners, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had expressed concern over &amp;ldquo;frivolous and vexatious use of the RTI Act&amp;rdquo;.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 17773,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Cabinet set to scrap go-ahead to RTI changes&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Indian Express&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More than six years after it gave the go-ahead to amend the RTI Act, 2005 to, among other things, exclude public notings on files by officials from being accessed under the transparency law, the Cabinet is expected to withdraw the move when it meets on Thursday.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sources told The Indian Express that the decision comes after UPA chairperson Sonia Gandhi indicated to the government her opposition to the proposed changes. RTI activists had experts had questioned the logic, with several National Advisory Council (NAC) members like Aruna Roy also criticising the proposed amendments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In July 2006, the Cabinet had cleared the amendments, which has been finalised after many government departments and organisations like the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC). Another amendment cleared by the Cabinet on the demand of the UPSC was aimed at exempting the competitive examination process from the RTI ambit. The proposal was to amend Section 2 (i)(a) of the RTI Act.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, the enabling Bill was never introduced in Parliament due to strong opposition by the activists.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While the government had taken the stand that file notings were exempted under the transparency laws in countries like the US, UK and Australia, the activists had said that there was no need for the amendments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The then Central Information Commissioner O P Kejriwal had also criticised the decision to exclude file notings from the purview of the RTI, saying it would take &amp;ldquo;life out of the law&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, the government is still to take a final decision on amending the Act to safeguard the sensitivity of the office of the Chief Justice of India. Aruna Roy had termed the amendments as an attempt by the government shield corrupt bureaucrats.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Earlier this month, addressing the annual convention of Information Commissioners, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had expressed concern over &amp;ldquo;frivolous and vexatious use of the RTI Act&amp;rdquo;.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Indian Express, 1 November, 2012, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/cabinet-set-to-scrap-goahead-to-rti-changes/1024910/&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;cabinet-set-to-scrap-go-ahead-to-rti-changes-17902&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 17902,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 17773
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Cabinet set to scrap go-ahead to RTI changes&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Right to Information,rti&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Indian Express

More than six years after it gave the go-ahead to amend the RTI Act, 2005 to, among other things, exclude public notings on files by officials from being accessed under the transparency law, the Cabinet is expected to...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Indian Express&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;More than six years after it gave the go-ahead to amend the RTI Act, 2005 to, among other things, exclude public notings on files by officials from being accessed under the transparency law, the Cabinet is expected to withdraw the move when it meets on Thursday.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sources told The Indian Express that the decision comes after UPA chairperson Sonia Gandhi indicated to the government her opposition to the proposed changes. RTI activists had experts had questioned the logic, with several National Advisory Council (NAC) members like Aruna Roy also criticising the proposed amendments.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In July 2006, the Cabinet had cleared the amendments, which has been finalised after many government departments and organisations like the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC). Another amendment cleared by the Cabinet on the demand of the UPSC was aimed at exempting the competitive examination process from the RTI ambit. The proposal was to amend Section 2 (i)(a) of the RTI Act.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, the enabling Bill was never introduced in Parliament due to strong opposition by the activists.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While the government had taken the stand that file notings were exempted under the transparency laws in countries like the US, UK and Australia, the activists had said that there was no need for the amendments.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The then Central Information Commissioner O P Kejriwal had also criticised the decision to exclude file notings from the purview of the RTI, saying it would take &amp;ldquo;life out of the law&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, the government is still to take a final decision on amending the Act to safeguard the sensitivity of the office of the Chief Justice of India. Aruna Roy had termed the amendments as an attempt by the government shield corrupt bureaucrats.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Earlier this month, addressing the annual convention of Information Commissioners, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had expressed concern over &amp;ldquo;frivolous and vexatious use of the RTI Act&amp;rdquo;.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/cabinet-set-to-scrap-go-ahead-to-rti-changes-17902.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Cabinet set to scrap go-ahead to RTI changes | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Indian Express

More than six years after it gave the go-ahead to amend the RTI Act, 2005 to, among other things, exclude public notings on files by officials from being accessed under the transparency law, the Cabinet is expected to..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Cabinet set to scrap go-ahead to RTI changes</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Indian Express<br /><br />More than six years after it gave the go-ahead to amend the RTI Act, 2005 to, among other things, exclude public notings on files by officials from being accessed under the transparency law, the Cabinet is expected to withdraw the move when it meets on Thursday.<br /><br />Sources told The Indian Express that the decision comes after UPA chairperson Sonia Gandhi indicated to the government her opposition to the proposed changes. RTI activists had experts had questioned the logic, with several National Advisory Council (NAC) members like Aruna Roy also criticising the proposed amendments.<br /><br />In July 2006, the Cabinet had cleared the amendments, which has been finalised after many government departments and organisations like the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC). Another amendment cleared by the Cabinet on the demand of the UPSC was aimed at exempting the competitive examination process from the RTI ambit. The proposal was to amend Section 2 (i)(a) of the RTI Act.<br /><br />However, the enabling Bill was never introduced in Parliament due to strong opposition by the activists.<br /><br />While the government had taken the stand that file notings were exempted under the transparency laws in countries like the US, UK and Australia, the activists had said that there was no need for the amendments.<br /><br />The then Central Information Commissioner O P Kejriwal had also criticised the decision to exclude file notings from the purview of the RTI, saying it would take &ldquo;life out of the law&rdquo;.<br /><br />However, the government is still to take a final decision on amending the Act to safeguard the sensitivity of the office of the Chief Justice of India. Aruna Roy had termed the amendments as an attempt by the government shield corrupt bureaucrats.<br /><br />Earlier this month, addressing the annual convention of Information Commissioners, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had expressed concern over &ldquo;frivolous and vexatious use of the RTI Act&rdquo;.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 17773,
		'title' => 'Cabinet set to scrap go-ahead to RTI changes',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Indian Express<br />
<br />
More than six years after it gave the go-ahead to amend the RTI Act, 2005 to, among other things, exclude public notings on files by officials from being accessed under the transparency law, the Cabinet is expected to withdraw the move when it meets on Thursday.<br />
<br />
Sources told The Indian Express that the decision comes after UPA chairperson Sonia Gandhi indicated to the government her opposition to the proposed changes. RTI activists had experts had questioned the logic, with several National Advisory Council (NAC) members like Aruna Roy also criticising the proposed amendments.<br />
<br />
In July 2006, the Cabinet had cleared the amendments, which has been finalised after many government departments and organisations like the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC). Another amendment cleared by the Cabinet on the demand of the UPSC was aimed at exempting the competitive examination process from the RTI ambit. The proposal was to amend Section 2 (i)(a) of the RTI Act.<br />
<br />
However, the enabling Bill was never introduced in Parliament due to strong opposition by the activists.<br />
<br />
While the government had taken the stand that file notings were exempted under the transparency laws in countries like the US, UK and Australia, the activists had said that there was no need for the amendments.<br />
<br />
The then Central Information Commissioner O P Kejriwal had also criticised the decision to exclude file notings from the purview of the RTI, saying it would take &ldquo;life out of the law&rdquo;.<br />
<br />
However, the government is still to take a final decision on amending the Act to safeguard the sensitivity of the office of the Chief Justice of India. Aruna Roy had termed the amendments as an attempt by the government shield corrupt bureaucrats.<br />
<br />
Earlier this month, addressing the annual convention of Information Commissioners, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had expressed concern over &ldquo;frivolous and vexatious use of the RTI Act&rdquo;.
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 1 November, 2012, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/cabinet-set-to-scrap-goahead-to-rti-changes/1024910/',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'cabinet-set-to-scrap-go-ahead-to-rti-changes-17902',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 17902,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 17773,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Cabinet set to scrap go-ahead to RTI changes',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Right to Information,rti',
	'metaDesc' => '
-The Indian Express

More than six years after it gave the go-ahead to amend the RTI Act, 2005 to, among other things, exclude public notings on files by officials from being accessed under the transparency law, the Cabinet is expected to...',
	'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Indian Express<br /><br />More than six years after it gave the go-ahead to amend the RTI Act, 2005 to, among other things, exclude public notings on files by officials from being accessed under the transparency law, the Cabinet is expected to withdraw the move when it meets on Thursday.<br /><br />Sources told The Indian Express that the decision comes after UPA chairperson Sonia Gandhi indicated to the government her opposition to the proposed changes. RTI activists had experts had questioned the logic, with several National Advisory Council (NAC) members like Aruna Roy also criticising the proposed amendments.<br /><br />In July 2006, the Cabinet had cleared the amendments, which has been finalised after many government departments and organisations like the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC). Another amendment cleared by the Cabinet on the demand of the UPSC was aimed at exempting the competitive examination process from the RTI ambit. The proposal was to amend Section 2 (i)(a) of the RTI Act.<br /><br />However, the enabling Bill was never introduced in Parliament due to strong opposition by the activists.<br /><br />While the government had taken the stand that file notings were exempted under the transparency laws in countries like the US, UK and Australia, the activists had said that there was no need for the amendments.<br /><br />The then Central Information Commissioner O P Kejriwal had also criticised the decision to exclude file notings from the purview of the RTI, saying it would take &ldquo;life out of the law&rdquo;.<br /><br />However, the government is still to take a final decision on amending the Act to safeguard the sensitivity of the office of the Chief Justice of India. Aruna Roy had termed the amendments as an attempt by the government shield corrupt bureaucrats.<br /><br />Earlier this month, addressing the annual convention of Information Commissioners, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had expressed concern over &ldquo;frivolous and vexatious use of the RTI Act&rdquo;.</div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 17773,
	'title' => 'Cabinet set to scrap go-ahead to RTI changes',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Indian Express<br />
<br />
More than six years after it gave the go-ahead to amend the RTI Act, 2005 to, among other things, exclude public notings on files by officials from being accessed under the transparency law, the Cabinet is expected to withdraw the move when it meets on Thursday.<br />
<br />
Sources told The Indian Express that the decision comes after UPA chairperson Sonia Gandhi indicated to the government her opposition to the proposed changes. RTI activists had experts had questioned the logic, with several National Advisory Council (NAC) members like Aruna Roy also criticising the proposed amendments.<br />
<br />
In July 2006, the Cabinet had cleared the amendments, which has been finalised after many government departments and organisations like the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC). Another amendment cleared by the Cabinet on the demand of the UPSC was aimed at exempting the competitive examination process from the RTI ambit. The proposal was to amend Section 2 (i)(a) of the RTI Act.<br />
<br />
However, the enabling Bill was never introduced in Parliament due to strong opposition by the activists.<br />
<br />
While the government had taken the stand that file notings were exempted under the transparency laws in countries like the US, UK and Australia, the activists had said that there was no need for the amendments.<br />
<br />
The then Central Information Commissioner O P Kejriwal had also criticised the decision to exclude file notings from the purview of the RTI, saying it would take &ldquo;life out of the law&rdquo;.<br />
<br />
However, the government is still to take a final decision on amending the Act to safeguard the sensitivity of the office of the Chief Justice of India. Aruna Roy had termed the amendments as an attempt by the government shield corrupt bureaucrats.<br />
<br />
Earlier this month, addressing the annual convention of Information Commissioners, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had expressed concern over &ldquo;frivolous and vexatious use of the RTI Act&rdquo;.
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Indian Express, 1 November, 2012, http://www.indianexpress.com/news/cabinet-set-to-scrap-goahead-to-rti-changes/1024910/',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'cabinet-set-to-scrap-go-ahead-to-rti-changes-17902',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 17902,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 17773
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Cabinet set to scrap go-ahead to RTI changes'
$metaKeywords = 'Right to Information,rti'
$metaDesc = '
-The Indian Express

More than six years after it gave the go-ahead to amend the RTI Act, 2005 to, among other things, exclude public notings on files by officials from being accessed under the transparency law, the Cabinet is expected to...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-The Indian Express<br /><br />More than six years after it gave the go-ahead to amend the RTI Act, 2005 to, among other things, exclude public notings on files by officials from being accessed under the transparency law, the Cabinet is expected to withdraw the move when it meets on Thursday.<br /><br />Sources told The Indian Express that the decision comes after UPA chairperson Sonia Gandhi indicated to the government her opposition to the proposed changes. RTI activists had experts had questioned the logic, with several National Advisory Council (NAC) members like Aruna Roy also criticising the proposed amendments.<br /><br />In July 2006, the Cabinet had cleared the amendments, which has been finalised after many government departments and organisations like the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC). Another amendment cleared by the Cabinet on the demand of the UPSC was aimed at exempting the competitive examination process from the RTI ambit. The proposal was to amend Section 2 (i)(a) of the RTI Act.<br /><br />However, the enabling Bill was never introduced in Parliament due to strong opposition by the activists.<br /><br />While the government had taken the stand that file notings were exempted under the transparency laws in countries like the US, UK and Australia, the activists had said that there was no need for the amendments.<br /><br />The then Central Information Commissioner O P Kejriwal had also criticised the decision to exclude file notings from the purview of the RTI, saying it would take &ldquo;life out of the law&rdquo;.<br /><br />However, the government is still to take a final decision on amending the Act to safeguard the sensitivity of the office of the Chief Justice of India. Aruna Roy had termed the amendments as an attempt by the government shield corrupt bureaucrats.<br /><br />Earlier this month, addressing the annual convention of Information Commissioners, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had expressed concern over &ldquo;frivolous and vexatious use of the RTI Act&rdquo;.</div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

Cabinet set to scrap go-ahead to RTI changes

-The Indian Express More than six years after it gave the go-ahead to amend the RTI Act, 2005 to, among other things, exclude public notings on files by officials from being accessed under the transparency law, the Cabinet is expected to withdraw the move when it meets on Thursday. Sources told The Indian Express that the decision comes after UPA chairperson Sonia Gandhi indicated to the government her opposition to the proposed changes. RTI activists had experts had questioned the logic, with several National Advisory Council (NAC) members like Aruna Roy also criticising the proposed amendments. In July 2006, the Cabinet had cleared the amendments, which has been finalised after many government departments and organisations like the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC). Another amendment cleared by the Cabinet on the demand of the UPSC was aimed at exempting the competitive examination process from the RTI ambit. The proposal was to amend Section 2 (i)(a) of the RTI Act. However, the enabling Bill was never introduced in Parliament due to strong opposition by the activists. While the government had taken the stand that file notings were exempted under the transparency laws in countries like the US, UK and Australia, the activists had said that there was no need for the amendments. The then Central Information Commissioner O P Kejriwal had also criticised the decision to exclude file notings from the purview of the RTI, saying it would take “life out of the law”. However, the government is still to take a final decision on amending the Act to safeguard the sensitivity of the office of the Chief Justice of India. Aruna Roy had termed the amendments as an attempt by the government shield corrupt bureaucrats. Earlier this month, addressing the annual convention of Information Commissioners, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had expressed concern over “frivolous and vexatious use of the RTI Act”.