Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/cag-too-was-critical-of-nrhm-implementation-10235/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/cag-too-was-critical-of-nrhm-implementation-10235/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/cag-too-was-critical-of-nrhm-implementation-10235/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/cag-too-was-critical-of-nrhm-implementation-10235/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68007d8feff03-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68007d8feff03-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68007d8feff03-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68007d8feff03-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68007d8feff03-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68007d8feff03-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68007d8feff03-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68007d8feff03-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68007d8feff03-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10125, 'title' => 'CAG too was critical of NRHM implementation', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p> -IBN </p> <p> &nbsp; </p> <div align="justify"> The statement of the Union Minister of State for Health, Mullappally Ramachandran, the other day that the local bodies had failed to utilise National Rural Health Mission (NRHM) funds comes as no surprise.<br /> <br /> * The last report of the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) on the implementation NRHM in Kerala had pointed out in detail the deficiencies such as absence of a perspective plan, accumulation of huge unspent funds in banks, diversion of funds, slow pace of upgradation work in some institutions and lack of medical and para-medical staff.<br /> <br /> * The CAG report has made it clear that no perspective plan for the mission period was prepared by the State Health and Family Welfare Society to ensure execution of projects along a critical path. Further more, the report states that NRHM funds of Rs 1.48 crore were spent during 2007-08 and 2008-09 for activities not approved by the Government of India in the annual programme implementation plans and Rs 51.86 lakh was diverted without Central approval.<br /> <br /> * The report pointed out that only sample household surveys were carried out in the three test-checked districts in the state, facility surveys required for identifying the healthcare needs of rural areas were conducted only in Community Health Centres though the guidelines stipulated that these were also to be carried out in Primary Health Centres and sub centres.<br /> <br /> * The report said that the management expenditure exceeded the prescribed limit of six per cent. &lsquo;&rsquo;Manpower, infrastructure and equipment in Community Health Centres and Primary Health Centres did not meet the Indian Public<br /> <br /> Health Standards despite upgradation through NRHM. Guidelines and the Purchase Preference Policy prescribed by the Government of India for procurement of medicines were not followed. No pre-despatch or post-despatch inspections of drug kits, surgical kits and Accredited Social Health Activists&rsquo; drug kits were conducted. Non levy of penalty for delayed supplies of medicines amounted to Rs 3.18 crore,&rdquo; the report <br /> said.<br /> <br /> * As per IPHS norms, seven specialists and nine staff nurses with supporting staff were required in each Community. Health Centre (CHC). Forty nine CHCs did not have any specialists, while 21 CHCs had less than the prescribed number of specialists and only one CHC had the full complement of specialists. As regards staff nurses, nine CHCs had nine or more staff nurses, 57 had less than nine and four CHCs had no staff nurse.<br /> <br /> * The CAG report also had suggested that the state-level action plan should be a part of the perspective plan and prepared only on the basis of consolidated action plans at the village, block and district-levels so that actual requirements are projected. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'IBN, 24 September, 2011, http://ibnlive.in.com/news/cag-too-was-critical-of-nrhm-implementation/187136-60-116.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'cag-too-was-critical-of-nrhm-implementation-10235', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10235, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 10125, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | CAG too was critical of NRHM implementation', 'metaKeywords' => 'NRHM,CAG,Health', 'metaDesc' => ' -IBN &nbsp; The statement of the Union Minister of State for Health, Mullappally Ramachandran, the other day that the local bodies had failed to utilise National Rural Health Mission (NRHM) funds comes as no surprise. * The last report of the Comptroller and...', 'disp' => '<p>-IBN</p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">The statement of the Union Minister of State for Health, Mullappally Ramachandran, the other day that the local bodies had failed to utilise National Rural Health Mission (NRHM) funds comes as no surprise.<br /><br />* The last report of the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) on the implementation NRHM in Kerala had pointed out in detail the deficiencies such as absence of a perspective plan, accumulation of huge unspent funds in banks, diversion of funds, slow pace of upgradation work in some institutions and lack of medical and para-medical staff.<br /><br />* The CAG report has made it clear that no perspective plan for the mission period was prepared by the State Health and Family Welfare Society to ensure execution of projects along a critical path. Further more, the report states that NRHM funds of Rs 1.48 crore were spent during 2007-08 and 2008-09 for activities not approved by the Government of India in the annual programme implementation plans and Rs 51.86 lakh was diverted without Central approval.<br /><br />* The report pointed out that only sample household surveys were carried out in the three test-checked districts in the state, facility surveys required for identifying the healthcare needs of rural areas were conducted only in Community Health Centres though the guidelines stipulated that these were also to be carried out in Primary Health Centres and sub centres.<br /><br />* The report said that the management expenditure exceeded the prescribed limit of six per cent. &lsquo;&rsquo;Manpower, infrastructure and equipment in Community Health Centres and Primary Health Centres did not meet the Indian Public<br /><br />Health Standards despite upgradation through NRHM. Guidelines and the Purchase Preference Policy prescribed by the Government of India for procurement of medicines were not followed. No pre-despatch or post-despatch inspections of drug kits, surgical kits and Accredited Social Health Activists&rsquo; drug kits were conducted. Non levy of penalty for delayed supplies of medicines amounted to Rs 3.18 crore,&rdquo; the report <br />said.<br /><br />* As per IPHS norms, seven specialists and nine staff nurses with supporting staff were required in each Community. Health Centre (CHC). Forty nine CHCs did not have any specialists, while 21 CHCs had less than the prescribed number of specialists and only one CHC had the full complement of specialists. As regards staff nurses, nine CHCs had nine or more staff nurses, 57 had less than nine and four CHCs had no staff nurse.<br /><br />* The CAG report also had suggested that the state-level action plan should be a part of the perspective plan and prepared only on the basis of consolidated action plans at the village, block and district-levels so that actual requirements are projected.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10125, 'title' => 'CAG too was critical of NRHM implementation', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p> -IBN </p> <p> &nbsp; </p> <div align="justify"> The statement of the Union Minister of State for Health, Mullappally Ramachandran, the other day that the local bodies had failed to utilise National Rural Health Mission (NRHM) funds comes as no surprise.<br /> <br /> * The last report of the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) on the implementation NRHM in Kerala had pointed out in detail the deficiencies such as absence of a perspective plan, accumulation of huge unspent funds in banks, diversion of funds, slow pace of upgradation work in some institutions and lack of medical and para-medical staff.<br /> <br /> * The CAG report has made it clear that no perspective plan for the mission period was prepared by the State Health and Family Welfare Society to ensure execution of projects along a critical path. Further more, the report states that NRHM funds of Rs 1.48 crore were spent during 2007-08 and 2008-09 for activities not approved by the Government of India in the annual programme implementation plans and Rs 51.86 lakh was diverted without Central approval.<br /> <br /> * The report pointed out that only sample household surveys were carried out in the three test-checked districts in the state, facility surveys required for identifying the healthcare needs of rural areas were conducted only in Community Health Centres though the guidelines stipulated that these were also to be carried out in Primary Health Centres and sub centres.<br /> <br /> * The report said that the management expenditure exceeded the prescribed limit of six per cent. &lsquo;&rsquo;Manpower, infrastructure and equipment in Community Health Centres and Primary Health Centres did not meet the Indian Public<br /> <br /> Health Standards despite upgradation through NRHM. Guidelines and the Purchase Preference Policy prescribed by the Government of India for procurement of medicines were not followed. No pre-despatch or post-despatch inspections of drug kits, surgical kits and Accredited Social Health Activists&rsquo; drug kits were conducted. Non levy of penalty for delayed supplies of medicines amounted to Rs 3.18 crore,&rdquo; the report <br /> said.<br /> <br /> * As per IPHS norms, seven specialists and nine staff nurses with supporting staff were required in each Community. Health Centre (CHC). Forty nine CHCs did not have any specialists, while 21 CHCs had less than the prescribed number of specialists and only one CHC had the full complement of specialists. As regards staff nurses, nine CHCs had nine or more staff nurses, 57 had less than nine and four CHCs had no staff nurse.<br /> <br /> * The CAG report also had suggested that the state-level action plan should be a part of the perspective plan and prepared only on the basis of consolidated action plans at the village, block and district-levels so that actual requirements are projected. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'IBN, 24 September, 2011, http://ibnlive.in.com/news/cag-too-was-critical-of-nrhm-implementation/187136-60-116.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'cag-too-was-critical-of-nrhm-implementation-10235', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10235, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 10125 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | CAG too was critical of NRHM implementation' $metaKeywords = 'NRHM,CAG,Health' $metaDesc = ' -IBN &nbsp; The statement of the Union Minister of State for Health, Mullappally Ramachandran, the other day that the local bodies had failed to utilise National Rural Health Mission (NRHM) funds comes as no surprise. * The last report of the Comptroller and...' $disp = '<p>-IBN</p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">The statement of the Union Minister of State for Health, Mullappally Ramachandran, the other day that the local bodies had failed to utilise National Rural Health Mission (NRHM) funds comes as no surprise.<br /><br />* The last report of the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) on the implementation NRHM in Kerala had pointed out in detail the deficiencies such as absence of a perspective plan, accumulation of huge unspent funds in banks, diversion of funds, slow pace of upgradation work in some institutions and lack of medical and para-medical staff.<br /><br />* The CAG report has made it clear that no perspective plan for the mission period was prepared by the State Health and Family Welfare Society to ensure execution of projects along a critical path. Further more, the report states that NRHM funds of Rs 1.48 crore were spent during 2007-08 and 2008-09 for activities not approved by the Government of India in the annual programme implementation plans and Rs 51.86 lakh was diverted without Central approval.<br /><br />* The report pointed out that only sample household surveys were carried out in the three test-checked districts in the state, facility surveys required for identifying the healthcare needs of rural areas were conducted only in Community Health Centres though the guidelines stipulated that these were also to be carried out in Primary Health Centres and sub centres.<br /><br />* The report said that the management expenditure exceeded the prescribed limit of six per cent. &lsquo;&rsquo;Manpower, infrastructure and equipment in Community Health Centres and Primary Health Centres did not meet the Indian Public<br /><br />Health Standards despite upgradation through NRHM. Guidelines and the Purchase Preference Policy prescribed by the Government of India for procurement of medicines were not followed. No pre-despatch or post-despatch inspections of drug kits, surgical kits and Accredited Social Health Activists&rsquo; drug kits were conducted. Non levy of penalty for delayed supplies of medicines amounted to Rs 3.18 crore,&rdquo; the report <br />said.<br /><br />* As per IPHS norms, seven specialists and nine staff nurses with supporting staff were required in each Community. Health Centre (CHC). Forty nine CHCs did not have any specialists, while 21 CHCs had less than the prescribed number of specialists and only one CHC had the full complement of specialists. As regards staff nurses, nine CHCs had nine or more staff nurses, 57 had less than nine and four CHCs had no staff nurse.<br /><br />* The CAG report also had suggested that the state-level action plan should be a part of the perspective plan and prepared only on the basis of consolidated action plans at the village, block and district-levels so that actual requirements are projected.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/cag-too-was-critical-of-nrhm-implementation-10235.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | CAG too was critical of NRHM implementation | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -IBN The statement of the Union Minister of State for Health, Mullappally Ramachandran, the other day that the local bodies had failed to utilise National Rural Health Mission (NRHM) funds comes as no surprise. * The last report of the Comptroller and..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>CAG too was critical of NRHM implementation</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p>-IBN</p><p> </p><div align="justify">The statement of the Union Minister of State for Health, Mullappally Ramachandran, the other day that the local bodies had failed to utilise National Rural Health Mission (NRHM) funds comes as no surprise.<br /><br />* The last report of the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) on the implementation NRHM in Kerala had pointed out in detail the deficiencies such as absence of a perspective plan, accumulation of huge unspent funds in banks, diversion of funds, slow pace of upgradation work in some institutions and lack of medical and para-medical staff.<br /><br />* The CAG report has made it clear that no perspective plan for the mission period was prepared by the State Health and Family Welfare Society to ensure execution of projects along a critical path. Further more, the report states that NRHM funds of Rs 1.48 crore were spent during 2007-08 and 2008-09 for activities not approved by the Government of India in the annual programme implementation plans and Rs 51.86 lakh was diverted without Central approval.<br /><br />* The report pointed out that only sample household surveys were carried out in the three test-checked districts in the state, facility surveys required for identifying the healthcare needs of rural areas were conducted only in Community Health Centres though the guidelines stipulated that these were also to be carried out in Primary Health Centres and sub centres.<br /><br />* The report said that the management expenditure exceeded the prescribed limit of six per cent. ‘’Manpower, infrastructure and equipment in Community Health Centres and Primary Health Centres did not meet the Indian Public<br /><br />Health Standards despite upgradation through NRHM. Guidelines and the Purchase Preference Policy prescribed by the Government of India for procurement of medicines were not followed. No pre-despatch or post-despatch inspections of drug kits, surgical kits and Accredited Social Health Activists’ drug kits were conducted. Non levy of penalty for delayed supplies of medicines amounted to Rs 3.18 crore,” the report <br />said.<br /><br />* As per IPHS norms, seven specialists and nine staff nurses with supporting staff were required in each Community. Health Centre (CHC). Forty nine CHCs did not have any specialists, while 21 CHCs had less than the prescribed number of specialists and only one CHC had the full complement of specialists. As regards staff nurses, nine CHCs had nine or more staff nurses, 57 had less than nine and four CHCs had no staff nurse.<br /><br />* The CAG report also had suggested that the state-level action plan should be a part of the perspective plan and prepared only on the basis of consolidated action plans at the village, block and district-levels so that actual requirements are projected.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68007d8feff03-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68007d8feff03-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68007d8feff03-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68007d8feff03-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68007d8feff03-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68007d8feff03-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68007d8feff03-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68007d8feff03-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68007d8feff03-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10125, 'title' => 'CAG too was critical of NRHM implementation', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p> -IBN </p> <p> &nbsp; </p> <div align="justify"> The statement of the Union Minister of State for Health, Mullappally Ramachandran, the other day that the local bodies had failed to utilise National Rural Health Mission (NRHM) funds comes as no surprise.<br /> <br /> * The last report of the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) on the implementation NRHM in Kerala had pointed out in detail the deficiencies such as absence of a perspective plan, accumulation of huge unspent funds in banks, diversion of funds, slow pace of upgradation work in some institutions and lack of medical and para-medical staff.<br /> <br /> * The CAG report has made it clear that no perspective plan for the mission period was prepared by the State Health and Family Welfare Society to ensure execution of projects along a critical path. Further more, the report states that NRHM funds of Rs 1.48 crore were spent during 2007-08 and 2008-09 for activities not approved by the Government of India in the annual programme implementation plans and Rs 51.86 lakh was diverted without Central approval.<br /> <br /> * The report pointed out that only sample household surveys were carried out in the three test-checked districts in the state, facility surveys required for identifying the healthcare needs of rural areas were conducted only in Community Health Centres though the guidelines stipulated that these were also to be carried out in Primary Health Centres and sub centres.<br /> <br /> * The report said that the management expenditure exceeded the prescribed limit of six per cent. &lsquo;&rsquo;Manpower, infrastructure and equipment in Community Health Centres and Primary Health Centres did not meet the Indian Public<br /> <br /> Health Standards despite upgradation through NRHM. Guidelines and the Purchase Preference Policy prescribed by the Government of India for procurement of medicines were not followed. No pre-despatch or post-despatch inspections of drug kits, surgical kits and Accredited Social Health Activists&rsquo; drug kits were conducted. Non levy of penalty for delayed supplies of medicines amounted to Rs 3.18 crore,&rdquo; the report <br /> said.<br /> <br /> * As per IPHS norms, seven specialists and nine staff nurses with supporting staff were required in each Community. Health Centre (CHC). Forty nine CHCs did not have any specialists, while 21 CHCs had less than the prescribed number of specialists and only one CHC had the full complement of specialists. As regards staff nurses, nine CHCs had nine or more staff nurses, 57 had less than nine and four CHCs had no staff nurse.<br /> <br /> * The CAG report also had suggested that the state-level action plan should be a part of the perspective plan and prepared only on the basis of consolidated action plans at the village, block and district-levels so that actual requirements are projected. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'IBN, 24 September, 2011, http://ibnlive.in.com/news/cag-too-was-critical-of-nrhm-implementation/187136-60-116.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'cag-too-was-critical-of-nrhm-implementation-10235', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10235, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 10125, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | CAG too was critical of NRHM implementation', 'metaKeywords' => 'NRHM,CAG,Health', 'metaDesc' => ' -IBN &nbsp; The statement of the Union Minister of State for Health, Mullappally Ramachandran, the other day that the local bodies had failed to utilise National Rural Health Mission (NRHM) funds comes as no surprise. * The last report of the Comptroller and...', 'disp' => '<p>-IBN</p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">The statement of the Union Minister of State for Health, Mullappally Ramachandran, the other day that the local bodies had failed to utilise National Rural Health Mission (NRHM) funds comes as no surprise.<br /><br />* The last report of the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) on the implementation NRHM in Kerala had pointed out in detail the deficiencies such as absence of a perspective plan, accumulation of huge unspent funds in banks, diversion of funds, slow pace of upgradation work in some institutions and lack of medical and para-medical staff.<br /><br />* The CAG report has made it clear that no perspective plan for the mission period was prepared by the State Health and Family Welfare Society to ensure execution of projects along a critical path. Further more, the report states that NRHM funds of Rs 1.48 crore were spent during 2007-08 and 2008-09 for activities not approved by the Government of India in the annual programme implementation plans and Rs 51.86 lakh was diverted without Central approval.<br /><br />* The report pointed out that only sample household surveys were carried out in the three test-checked districts in the state, facility surveys required for identifying the healthcare needs of rural areas were conducted only in Community Health Centres though the guidelines stipulated that these were also to be carried out in Primary Health Centres and sub centres.<br /><br />* The report said that the management expenditure exceeded the prescribed limit of six per cent. &lsquo;&rsquo;Manpower, infrastructure and equipment in Community Health Centres and Primary Health Centres did not meet the Indian Public<br /><br />Health Standards despite upgradation through NRHM. Guidelines and the Purchase Preference Policy prescribed by the Government of India for procurement of medicines were not followed. No pre-despatch or post-despatch inspections of drug kits, surgical kits and Accredited Social Health Activists&rsquo; drug kits were conducted. Non levy of penalty for delayed supplies of medicines amounted to Rs 3.18 crore,&rdquo; the report <br />said.<br /><br />* As per IPHS norms, seven specialists and nine staff nurses with supporting staff were required in each Community. Health Centre (CHC). Forty nine CHCs did not have any specialists, while 21 CHCs had less than the prescribed number of specialists and only one CHC had the full complement of specialists. As regards staff nurses, nine CHCs had nine or more staff nurses, 57 had less than nine and four CHCs had no staff nurse.<br /><br />* The CAG report also had suggested that the state-level action plan should be a part of the perspective plan and prepared only on the basis of consolidated action plans at the village, block and district-levels so that actual requirements are projected.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10125, 'title' => 'CAG too was critical of NRHM implementation', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p> -IBN </p> <p> &nbsp; </p> <div align="justify"> The statement of the Union Minister of State for Health, Mullappally Ramachandran, the other day that the local bodies had failed to utilise National Rural Health Mission (NRHM) funds comes as no surprise.<br /> <br /> * The last report of the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) on the implementation NRHM in Kerala had pointed out in detail the deficiencies such as absence of a perspective plan, accumulation of huge unspent funds in banks, diversion of funds, slow pace of upgradation work in some institutions and lack of medical and para-medical staff.<br /> <br /> * The CAG report has made it clear that no perspective plan for the mission period was prepared by the State Health and Family Welfare Society to ensure execution of projects along a critical path. Further more, the report states that NRHM funds of Rs 1.48 crore were spent during 2007-08 and 2008-09 for activities not approved by the Government of India in the annual programme implementation plans and Rs 51.86 lakh was diverted without Central approval.<br /> <br /> * The report pointed out that only sample household surveys were carried out in the three test-checked districts in the state, facility surveys required for identifying the healthcare needs of rural areas were conducted only in Community Health Centres though the guidelines stipulated that these were also to be carried out in Primary Health Centres and sub centres.<br /> <br /> * The report said that the management expenditure exceeded the prescribed limit of six per cent. &lsquo;&rsquo;Manpower, infrastructure and equipment in Community Health Centres and Primary Health Centres did not meet the Indian Public<br /> <br /> Health Standards despite upgradation through NRHM. Guidelines and the Purchase Preference Policy prescribed by the Government of India for procurement of medicines were not followed. No pre-despatch or post-despatch inspections of drug kits, surgical kits and Accredited Social Health Activists&rsquo; drug kits were conducted. Non levy of penalty for delayed supplies of medicines amounted to Rs 3.18 crore,&rdquo; the report <br /> said.<br /> <br /> * As per IPHS norms, seven specialists and nine staff nurses with supporting staff were required in each Community. Health Centre (CHC). Forty nine CHCs did not have any specialists, while 21 CHCs had less than the prescribed number of specialists and only one CHC had the full complement of specialists. As regards staff nurses, nine CHCs had nine or more staff nurses, 57 had less than nine and four CHCs had no staff nurse.<br /> <br /> * The CAG report also had suggested that the state-level action plan should be a part of the perspective plan and prepared only on the basis of consolidated action plans at the village, block and district-levels so that actual requirements are projected. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'IBN, 24 September, 2011, http://ibnlive.in.com/news/cag-too-was-critical-of-nrhm-implementation/187136-60-116.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'cag-too-was-critical-of-nrhm-implementation-10235', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10235, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 10125 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | CAG too was critical of NRHM implementation' $metaKeywords = 'NRHM,CAG,Health' $metaDesc = ' -IBN &nbsp; The statement of the Union Minister of State for Health, Mullappally Ramachandran, the other day that the local bodies had failed to utilise National Rural Health Mission (NRHM) funds comes as no surprise. * The last report of the Comptroller and...' $disp = '<p>-IBN</p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">The statement of the Union Minister of State for Health, Mullappally Ramachandran, the other day that the local bodies had failed to utilise National Rural Health Mission (NRHM) funds comes as no surprise.<br /><br />* The last report of the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) on the implementation NRHM in Kerala had pointed out in detail the deficiencies such as absence of a perspective plan, accumulation of huge unspent funds in banks, diversion of funds, slow pace of upgradation work in some institutions and lack of medical and para-medical staff.<br /><br />* The CAG report has made it clear that no perspective plan for the mission period was prepared by the State Health and Family Welfare Society to ensure execution of projects along a critical path. Further more, the report states that NRHM funds of Rs 1.48 crore were spent during 2007-08 and 2008-09 for activities not approved by the Government of India in the annual programme implementation plans and Rs 51.86 lakh was diverted without Central approval.<br /><br />* The report pointed out that only sample household surveys were carried out in the three test-checked districts in the state, facility surveys required for identifying the healthcare needs of rural areas were conducted only in Community Health Centres though the guidelines stipulated that these were also to be carried out in Primary Health Centres and sub centres.<br /><br />* The report said that the management expenditure exceeded the prescribed limit of six per cent. &lsquo;&rsquo;Manpower, infrastructure and equipment in Community Health Centres and Primary Health Centres did not meet the Indian Public<br /><br />Health Standards despite upgradation through NRHM. Guidelines and the Purchase Preference Policy prescribed by the Government of India for procurement of medicines were not followed. No pre-despatch or post-despatch inspections of drug kits, surgical kits and Accredited Social Health Activists&rsquo; drug kits were conducted. Non levy of penalty for delayed supplies of medicines amounted to Rs 3.18 crore,&rdquo; the report <br />said.<br /><br />* As per IPHS norms, seven specialists and nine staff nurses with supporting staff were required in each Community. Health Centre (CHC). Forty nine CHCs did not have any specialists, while 21 CHCs had less than the prescribed number of specialists and only one CHC had the full complement of specialists. As regards staff nurses, nine CHCs had nine or more staff nurses, 57 had less than nine and four CHCs had no staff nurse.<br /><br />* The CAG report also had suggested that the state-level action plan should be a part of the perspective plan and prepared only on the basis of consolidated action plans at the village, block and district-levels so that actual requirements are projected.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/cag-too-was-critical-of-nrhm-implementation-10235.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | CAG too was critical of NRHM implementation | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -IBN The statement of the Union Minister of State for Health, Mullappally Ramachandran, the other day that the local bodies had failed to utilise National Rural Health Mission (NRHM) funds comes as no surprise. * The last report of the Comptroller and..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>CAG too was critical of NRHM implementation</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p>-IBN</p><p> </p><div align="justify">The statement of the Union Minister of State for Health, Mullappally Ramachandran, the other day that the local bodies had failed to utilise National Rural Health Mission (NRHM) funds comes as no surprise.<br /><br />* The last report of the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) on the implementation NRHM in Kerala had pointed out in detail the deficiencies such as absence of a perspective plan, accumulation of huge unspent funds in banks, diversion of funds, slow pace of upgradation work in some institutions and lack of medical and para-medical staff.<br /><br />* The CAG report has made it clear that no perspective plan for the mission period was prepared by the State Health and Family Welfare Society to ensure execution of projects along a critical path. Further more, the report states that NRHM funds of Rs 1.48 crore were spent during 2007-08 and 2008-09 for activities not approved by the Government of India in the annual programme implementation plans and Rs 51.86 lakh was diverted without Central approval.<br /><br />* The report pointed out that only sample household surveys were carried out in the three test-checked districts in the state, facility surveys required for identifying the healthcare needs of rural areas were conducted only in Community Health Centres though the guidelines stipulated that these were also to be carried out in Primary Health Centres and sub centres.<br /><br />* The report said that the management expenditure exceeded the prescribed limit of six per cent. ‘’Manpower, infrastructure and equipment in Community Health Centres and Primary Health Centres did not meet the Indian Public<br /><br />Health Standards despite upgradation through NRHM. Guidelines and the Purchase Preference Policy prescribed by the Government of India for procurement of medicines were not followed. No pre-despatch or post-despatch inspections of drug kits, surgical kits and Accredited Social Health Activists’ drug kits were conducted. Non levy of penalty for delayed supplies of medicines amounted to Rs 3.18 crore,” the report <br />said.<br /><br />* As per IPHS norms, seven specialists and nine staff nurses with supporting staff were required in each Community. Health Centre (CHC). Forty nine CHCs did not have any specialists, while 21 CHCs had less than the prescribed number of specialists and only one CHC had the full complement of specialists. As regards staff nurses, nine CHCs had nine or more staff nurses, 57 had less than nine and four CHCs had no staff nurse.<br /><br />* The CAG report also had suggested that the state-level action plan should be a part of the perspective plan and prepared only on the basis of consolidated action plans at the village, block and district-levels so that actual requirements are projected.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68007d8feff03-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68007d8feff03-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68007d8feff03-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68007d8feff03-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68007d8feff03-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68007d8feff03-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68007d8feff03-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68007d8feff03-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68007d8feff03-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10125, 'title' => 'CAG too was critical of NRHM implementation', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p> -IBN </p> <p> &nbsp; </p> <div align="justify"> The statement of the Union Minister of State for Health, Mullappally Ramachandran, the other day that the local bodies had failed to utilise National Rural Health Mission (NRHM) funds comes as no surprise.<br /> <br /> * The last report of the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) on the implementation NRHM in Kerala had pointed out in detail the deficiencies such as absence of a perspective plan, accumulation of huge unspent funds in banks, diversion of funds, slow pace of upgradation work in some institutions and lack of medical and para-medical staff.<br /> <br /> * The CAG report has made it clear that no perspective plan for the mission period was prepared by the State Health and Family Welfare Society to ensure execution of projects along a critical path. Further more, the report states that NRHM funds of Rs 1.48 crore were spent during 2007-08 and 2008-09 for activities not approved by the Government of India in the annual programme implementation plans and Rs 51.86 lakh was diverted without Central approval.<br /> <br /> * The report pointed out that only sample household surveys were carried out in the three test-checked districts in the state, facility surveys required for identifying the healthcare needs of rural areas were conducted only in Community Health Centres though the guidelines stipulated that these were also to be carried out in Primary Health Centres and sub centres.<br /> <br /> * The report said that the management expenditure exceeded the prescribed limit of six per cent. &lsquo;&rsquo;Manpower, infrastructure and equipment in Community Health Centres and Primary Health Centres did not meet the Indian Public<br /> <br /> Health Standards despite upgradation through NRHM. Guidelines and the Purchase Preference Policy prescribed by the Government of India for procurement of medicines were not followed. No pre-despatch or post-despatch inspections of drug kits, surgical kits and Accredited Social Health Activists&rsquo; drug kits were conducted. Non levy of penalty for delayed supplies of medicines amounted to Rs 3.18 crore,&rdquo; the report <br /> said.<br /> <br /> * As per IPHS norms, seven specialists and nine staff nurses with supporting staff were required in each Community. Health Centre (CHC). Forty nine CHCs did not have any specialists, while 21 CHCs had less than the prescribed number of specialists and only one CHC had the full complement of specialists. As regards staff nurses, nine CHCs had nine or more staff nurses, 57 had less than nine and four CHCs had no staff nurse.<br /> <br /> * The CAG report also had suggested that the state-level action plan should be a part of the perspective plan and prepared only on the basis of consolidated action plans at the village, block and district-levels so that actual requirements are projected. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'IBN, 24 September, 2011, http://ibnlive.in.com/news/cag-too-was-critical-of-nrhm-implementation/187136-60-116.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'cag-too-was-critical-of-nrhm-implementation-10235', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10235, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 10125, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | CAG too was critical of NRHM implementation', 'metaKeywords' => 'NRHM,CAG,Health', 'metaDesc' => ' -IBN &nbsp; The statement of the Union Minister of State for Health, Mullappally Ramachandran, the other day that the local bodies had failed to utilise National Rural Health Mission (NRHM) funds comes as no surprise. * The last report of the Comptroller and...', 'disp' => '<p>-IBN</p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">The statement of the Union Minister of State for Health, Mullappally Ramachandran, the other day that the local bodies had failed to utilise National Rural Health Mission (NRHM) funds comes as no surprise.<br /><br />* The last report of the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) on the implementation NRHM in Kerala had pointed out in detail the deficiencies such as absence of a perspective plan, accumulation of huge unspent funds in banks, diversion of funds, slow pace of upgradation work in some institutions and lack of medical and para-medical staff.<br /><br />* The CAG report has made it clear that no perspective plan for the mission period was prepared by the State Health and Family Welfare Society to ensure execution of projects along a critical path. Further more, the report states that NRHM funds of Rs 1.48 crore were spent during 2007-08 and 2008-09 for activities not approved by the Government of India in the annual programme implementation plans and Rs 51.86 lakh was diverted without Central approval.<br /><br />* The report pointed out that only sample household surveys were carried out in the three test-checked districts in the state, facility surveys required for identifying the healthcare needs of rural areas were conducted only in Community Health Centres though the guidelines stipulated that these were also to be carried out in Primary Health Centres and sub centres.<br /><br />* The report said that the management expenditure exceeded the prescribed limit of six per cent. &lsquo;&rsquo;Manpower, infrastructure and equipment in Community Health Centres and Primary Health Centres did not meet the Indian Public<br /><br />Health Standards despite upgradation through NRHM. Guidelines and the Purchase Preference Policy prescribed by the Government of India for procurement of medicines were not followed. No pre-despatch or post-despatch inspections of drug kits, surgical kits and Accredited Social Health Activists&rsquo; drug kits were conducted. Non levy of penalty for delayed supplies of medicines amounted to Rs 3.18 crore,&rdquo; the report <br />said.<br /><br />* As per IPHS norms, seven specialists and nine staff nurses with supporting staff were required in each Community. Health Centre (CHC). Forty nine CHCs did not have any specialists, while 21 CHCs had less than the prescribed number of specialists and only one CHC had the full complement of specialists. As regards staff nurses, nine CHCs had nine or more staff nurses, 57 had less than nine and four CHCs had no staff nurse.<br /><br />* The CAG report also had suggested that the state-level action plan should be a part of the perspective plan and prepared only on the basis of consolidated action plans at the village, block and district-levels so that actual requirements are projected.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10125, 'title' => 'CAG too was critical of NRHM implementation', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p> -IBN </p> <p> &nbsp; </p> <div align="justify"> The statement of the Union Minister of State for Health, Mullappally Ramachandran, the other day that the local bodies had failed to utilise National Rural Health Mission (NRHM) funds comes as no surprise.<br /> <br /> * The last report of the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) on the implementation NRHM in Kerala had pointed out in detail the deficiencies such as absence of a perspective plan, accumulation of huge unspent funds in banks, diversion of funds, slow pace of upgradation work in some institutions and lack of medical and para-medical staff.<br /> <br /> * The CAG report has made it clear that no perspective plan for the mission period was prepared by the State Health and Family Welfare Society to ensure execution of projects along a critical path. Further more, the report states that NRHM funds of Rs 1.48 crore were spent during 2007-08 and 2008-09 for activities not approved by the Government of India in the annual programme implementation plans and Rs 51.86 lakh was diverted without Central approval.<br /> <br /> * The report pointed out that only sample household surveys were carried out in the three test-checked districts in the state, facility surveys required for identifying the healthcare needs of rural areas were conducted only in Community Health Centres though the guidelines stipulated that these were also to be carried out in Primary Health Centres and sub centres.<br /> <br /> * The report said that the management expenditure exceeded the prescribed limit of six per cent. &lsquo;&rsquo;Manpower, infrastructure and equipment in Community Health Centres and Primary Health Centres did not meet the Indian Public<br /> <br /> Health Standards despite upgradation through NRHM. Guidelines and the Purchase Preference Policy prescribed by the Government of India for procurement of medicines were not followed. No pre-despatch or post-despatch inspections of drug kits, surgical kits and Accredited Social Health Activists&rsquo; drug kits were conducted. Non levy of penalty for delayed supplies of medicines amounted to Rs 3.18 crore,&rdquo; the report <br /> said.<br /> <br /> * As per IPHS norms, seven specialists and nine staff nurses with supporting staff were required in each Community. Health Centre (CHC). Forty nine CHCs did not have any specialists, while 21 CHCs had less than the prescribed number of specialists and only one CHC had the full complement of specialists. As regards staff nurses, nine CHCs had nine or more staff nurses, 57 had less than nine and four CHCs had no staff nurse.<br /> <br /> * The CAG report also had suggested that the state-level action plan should be a part of the perspective plan and prepared only on the basis of consolidated action plans at the village, block and district-levels so that actual requirements are projected. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'IBN, 24 September, 2011, http://ibnlive.in.com/news/cag-too-was-critical-of-nrhm-implementation/187136-60-116.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'cag-too-was-critical-of-nrhm-implementation-10235', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10235, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 10125 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | CAG too was critical of NRHM implementation' $metaKeywords = 'NRHM,CAG,Health' $metaDesc = ' -IBN &nbsp; The statement of the Union Minister of State for Health, Mullappally Ramachandran, the other day that the local bodies had failed to utilise National Rural Health Mission (NRHM) funds comes as no surprise. * The last report of the Comptroller and...' $disp = '<p>-IBN</p><p>&nbsp;</p><div align="justify">The statement of the Union Minister of State for Health, Mullappally Ramachandran, the other day that the local bodies had failed to utilise National Rural Health Mission (NRHM) funds comes as no surprise.<br /><br />* The last report of the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) on the implementation NRHM in Kerala had pointed out in detail the deficiencies such as absence of a perspective plan, accumulation of huge unspent funds in banks, diversion of funds, slow pace of upgradation work in some institutions and lack of medical and para-medical staff.<br /><br />* The CAG report has made it clear that no perspective plan for the mission period was prepared by the State Health and Family Welfare Society to ensure execution of projects along a critical path. Further more, the report states that NRHM funds of Rs 1.48 crore were spent during 2007-08 and 2008-09 for activities not approved by the Government of India in the annual programme implementation plans and Rs 51.86 lakh was diverted without Central approval.<br /><br />* The report pointed out that only sample household surveys were carried out in the three test-checked districts in the state, facility surveys required for identifying the healthcare needs of rural areas were conducted only in Community Health Centres though the guidelines stipulated that these were also to be carried out in Primary Health Centres and sub centres.<br /><br />* The report said that the management expenditure exceeded the prescribed limit of six per cent. &lsquo;&rsquo;Manpower, infrastructure and equipment in Community Health Centres and Primary Health Centres did not meet the Indian Public<br /><br />Health Standards despite upgradation through NRHM. Guidelines and the Purchase Preference Policy prescribed by the Government of India for procurement of medicines were not followed. No pre-despatch or post-despatch inspections of drug kits, surgical kits and Accredited Social Health Activists&rsquo; drug kits were conducted. Non levy of penalty for delayed supplies of medicines amounted to Rs 3.18 crore,&rdquo; the report <br />said.<br /><br />* As per IPHS norms, seven specialists and nine staff nurses with supporting staff were required in each Community. Health Centre (CHC). Forty nine CHCs did not have any specialists, while 21 CHCs had less than the prescribed number of specialists and only one CHC had the full complement of specialists. As regards staff nurses, nine CHCs had nine or more staff nurses, 57 had less than nine and four CHCs had no staff nurse.<br /><br />* The CAG report also had suggested that the state-level action plan should be a part of the perspective plan and prepared only on the basis of consolidated action plans at the village, block and district-levels so that actual requirements are projected.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/cag-too-was-critical-of-nrhm-implementation-10235.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | CAG too was critical of NRHM implementation | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -IBN The statement of the Union Minister of State for Health, Mullappally Ramachandran, the other day that the local bodies had failed to utilise National Rural Health Mission (NRHM) funds comes as no surprise. * The last report of the Comptroller and..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>CAG too was critical of NRHM implementation</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p>-IBN</p><p> </p><div align="justify">The statement of the Union Minister of State for Health, Mullappally Ramachandran, the other day that the local bodies had failed to utilise National Rural Health Mission (NRHM) funds comes as no surprise.<br /><br />* The last report of the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) on the implementation NRHM in Kerala had pointed out in detail the deficiencies such as absence of a perspective plan, accumulation of huge unspent funds in banks, diversion of funds, slow pace of upgradation work in some institutions and lack of medical and para-medical staff.<br /><br />* The CAG report has made it clear that no perspective plan for the mission period was prepared by the State Health and Family Welfare Society to ensure execution of projects along a critical path. Further more, the report states that NRHM funds of Rs 1.48 crore were spent during 2007-08 and 2008-09 for activities not approved by the Government of India in the annual programme implementation plans and Rs 51.86 lakh was diverted without Central approval.<br /><br />* The report pointed out that only sample household surveys were carried out in the three test-checked districts in the state, facility surveys required for identifying the healthcare needs of rural areas were conducted only in Community Health Centres though the guidelines stipulated that these were also to be carried out in Primary Health Centres and sub centres.<br /><br />* The report said that the management expenditure exceeded the prescribed limit of six per cent. ‘’Manpower, infrastructure and equipment in Community Health Centres and Primary Health Centres did not meet the Indian Public<br /><br />Health Standards despite upgradation through NRHM. Guidelines and the Purchase Preference Policy prescribed by the Government of India for procurement of medicines were not followed. No pre-despatch or post-despatch inspections of drug kits, surgical kits and Accredited Social Health Activists’ drug kits were conducted. Non levy of penalty for delayed supplies of medicines amounted to Rs 3.18 crore,” the report <br />said.<br /><br />* As per IPHS norms, seven specialists and nine staff nurses with supporting staff were required in each Community. Health Centre (CHC). Forty nine CHCs did not have any specialists, while 21 CHCs had less than the prescribed number of specialists and only one CHC had the full complement of specialists. As regards staff nurses, nine CHCs had nine or more staff nurses, 57 had less than nine and four CHCs had no staff nurse.<br /><br />* The CAG report also had suggested that the state-level action plan should be a part of the perspective plan and prepared only on the basis of consolidated action plans at the village, block and district-levels so that actual requirements are projected.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10125, 'title' => 'CAG too was critical of NRHM implementation', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p> -IBN </p> <p> </p> <div align="justify"> The statement of the Union Minister of State for Health, Mullappally Ramachandran, the other day that the local bodies had failed to utilise National Rural Health Mission (NRHM) funds comes as no surprise.<br /> <br /> * The last report of the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) on the implementation NRHM in Kerala had pointed out in detail the deficiencies such as absence of a perspective plan, accumulation of huge unspent funds in banks, diversion of funds, slow pace of upgradation work in some institutions and lack of medical and para-medical staff.<br /> <br /> * The CAG report has made it clear that no perspective plan for the mission period was prepared by the State Health and Family Welfare Society to ensure execution of projects along a critical path. Further more, the report states that NRHM funds of Rs 1.48 crore were spent during 2007-08 and 2008-09 for activities not approved by the Government of India in the annual programme implementation plans and Rs 51.86 lakh was diverted without Central approval.<br /> <br /> * The report pointed out that only sample household surveys were carried out in the three test-checked districts in the state, facility surveys required for identifying the healthcare needs of rural areas were conducted only in Community Health Centres though the guidelines stipulated that these were also to be carried out in Primary Health Centres and sub centres.<br /> <br /> * The report said that the management expenditure exceeded the prescribed limit of six per cent. ‘’Manpower, infrastructure and equipment in Community Health Centres and Primary Health Centres did not meet the Indian Public<br /> <br /> Health Standards despite upgradation through NRHM. Guidelines and the Purchase Preference Policy prescribed by the Government of India for procurement of medicines were not followed. No pre-despatch or post-despatch inspections of drug kits, surgical kits and Accredited Social Health Activists’ drug kits were conducted. Non levy of penalty for delayed supplies of medicines amounted to Rs 3.18 crore,” the report <br /> said.<br /> <br /> * As per IPHS norms, seven specialists and nine staff nurses with supporting staff were required in each Community. Health Centre (CHC). Forty nine CHCs did not have any specialists, while 21 CHCs had less than the prescribed number of specialists and only one CHC had the full complement of specialists. As regards staff nurses, nine CHCs had nine or more staff nurses, 57 had less than nine and four CHCs had no staff nurse.<br /> <br /> * The CAG report also had suggested that the state-level action plan should be a part of the perspective plan and prepared only on the basis of consolidated action plans at the village, block and district-levels so that actual requirements are projected. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'IBN, 24 September, 2011, http://ibnlive.in.com/news/cag-too-was-critical-of-nrhm-implementation/187136-60-116.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'cag-too-was-critical-of-nrhm-implementation-10235', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10235, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 10125, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | CAG too was critical of NRHM implementation', 'metaKeywords' => 'NRHM,CAG,Health', 'metaDesc' => ' -IBN The statement of the Union Minister of State for Health, Mullappally Ramachandran, the other day that the local bodies had failed to utilise National Rural Health Mission (NRHM) funds comes as no surprise. * The last report of the Comptroller and...', 'disp' => '<p>-IBN</p><p> </p><div align="justify">The statement of the Union Minister of State for Health, Mullappally Ramachandran, the other day that the local bodies had failed to utilise National Rural Health Mission (NRHM) funds comes as no surprise.<br /><br />* The last report of the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) on the implementation NRHM in Kerala had pointed out in detail the deficiencies such as absence of a perspective plan, accumulation of huge unspent funds in banks, diversion of funds, slow pace of upgradation work in some institutions and lack of medical and para-medical staff.<br /><br />* The CAG report has made it clear that no perspective plan for the mission period was prepared by the State Health and Family Welfare Society to ensure execution of projects along a critical path. Further more, the report states that NRHM funds of Rs 1.48 crore were spent during 2007-08 and 2008-09 for activities not approved by the Government of India in the annual programme implementation plans and Rs 51.86 lakh was diverted without Central approval.<br /><br />* The report pointed out that only sample household surveys were carried out in the three test-checked districts in the state, facility surveys required for identifying the healthcare needs of rural areas were conducted only in Community Health Centres though the guidelines stipulated that these were also to be carried out in Primary Health Centres and sub centres.<br /><br />* The report said that the management expenditure exceeded the prescribed limit of six per cent. ‘’Manpower, infrastructure and equipment in Community Health Centres and Primary Health Centres did not meet the Indian Public<br /><br />Health Standards despite upgradation through NRHM. Guidelines and the Purchase Preference Policy prescribed by the Government of India for procurement of medicines were not followed. No pre-despatch or post-despatch inspections of drug kits, surgical kits and Accredited Social Health Activists’ drug kits were conducted. Non levy of penalty for delayed supplies of medicines amounted to Rs 3.18 crore,” the report <br />said.<br /><br />* As per IPHS norms, seven specialists and nine staff nurses with supporting staff were required in each Community. Health Centre (CHC). Forty nine CHCs did not have any specialists, while 21 CHCs had less than the prescribed number of specialists and only one CHC had the full complement of specialists. As regards staff nurses, nine CHCs had nine or more staff nurses, 57 had less than nine and four CHCs had no staff nurse.<br /><br />* The CAG report also had suggested that the state-level action plan should be a part of the perspective plan and prepared only on the basis of consolidated action plans at the village, block and district-levels so that actual requirements are projected.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 10125, 'title' => 'CAG too was critical of NRHM implementation', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p> -IBN </p> <p> </p> <div align="justify"> The statement of the Union Minister of State for Health, Mullappally Ramachandran, the other day that the local bodies had failed to utilise National Rural Health Mission (NRHM) funds comes as no surprise.<br /> <br /> * The last report of the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) on the implementation NRHM in Kerala had pointed out in detail the deficiencies such as absence of a perspective plan, accumulation of huge unspent funds in banks, diversion of funds, slow pace of upgradation work in some institutions and lack of medical and para-medical staff.<br /> <br /> * The CAG report has made it clear that no perspective plan for the mission period was prepared by the State Health and Family Welfare Society to ensure execution of projects along a critical path. Further more, the report states that NRHM funds of Rs 1.48 crore were spent during 2007-08 and 2008-09 for activities not approved by the Government of India in the annual programme implementation plans and Rs 51.86 lakh was diverted without Central approval.<br /> <br /> * The report pointed out that only sample household surveys were carried out in the three test-checked districts in the state, facility surveys required for identifying the healthcare needs of rural areas were conducted only in Community Health Centres though the guidelines stipulated that these were also to be carried out in Primary Health Centres and sub centres.<br /> <br /> * The report said that the management expenditure exceeded the prescribed limit of six per cent. ‘’Manpower, infrastructure and equipment in Community Health Centres and Primary Health Centres did not meet the Indian Public<br /> <br /> Health Standards despite upgradation through NRHM. Guidelines and the Purchase Preference Policy prescribed by the Government of India for procurement of medicines were not followed. No pre-despatch or post-despatch inspections of drug kits, surgical kits and Accredited Social Health Activists’ drug kits were conducted. Non levy of penalty for delayed supplies of medicines amounted to Rs 3.18 crore,” the report <br /> said.<br /> <br /> * As per IPHS norms, seven specialists and nine staff nurses with supporting staff were required in each Community. Health Centre (CHC). Forty nine CHCs did not have any specialists, while 21 CHCs had less than the prescribed number of specialists and only one CHC had the full complement of specialists. As regards staff nurses, nine CHCs had nine or more staff nurses, 57 had less than nine and four CHCs had no staff nurse.<br /> <br /> * The CAG report also had suggested that the state-level action plan should be a part of the perspective plan and prepared only on the basis of consolidated action plans at the village, block and district-levels so that actual requirements are projected. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'IBN, 24 September, 2011, http://ibnlive.in.com/news/cag-too-was-critical-of-nrhm-implementation/187136-60-116.html', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'cag-too-was-critical-of-nrhm-implementation-10235', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 10235, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 10125 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | CAG too was critical of NRHM implementation' $metaKeywords = 'NRHM,CAG,Health' $metaDesc = ' -IBN The statement of the Union Minister of State for Health, Mullappally Ramachandran, the other day that the local bodies had failed to utilise National Rural Health Mission (NRHM) funds comes as no surprise. * The last report of the Comptroller and...' $disp = '<p>-IBN</p><p> </p><div align="justify">The statement of the Union Minister of State for Health, Mullappally Ramachandran, the other day that the local bodies had failed to utilise National Rural Health Mission (NRHM) funds comes as no surprise.<br /><br />* The last report of the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) on the implementation NRHM in Kerala had pointed out in detail the deficiencies such as absence of a perspective plan, accumulation of huge unspent funds in banks, diversion of funds, slow pace of upgradation work in some institutions and lack of medical and para-medical staff.<br /><br />* The CAG report has made it clear that no perspective plan for the mission period was prepared by the State Health and Family Welfare Society to ensure execution of projects along a critical path. Further more, the report states that NRHM funds of Rs 1.48 crore were spent during 2007-08 and 2008-09 for activities not approved by the Government of India in the annual programme implementation plans and Rs 51.86 lakh was diverted without Central approval.<br /><br />* The report pointed out that only sample household surveys were carried out in the three test-checked districts in the state, facility surveys required for identifying the healthcare needs of rural areas were conducted only in Community Health Centres though the guidelines stipulated that these were also to be carried out in Primary Health Centres and sub centres.<br /><br />* The report said that the management expenditure exceeded the prescribed limit of six per cent. ‘’Manpower, infrastructure and equipment in Community Health Centres and Primary Health Centres did not meet the Indian Public<br /><br />Health Standards despite upgradation through NRHM. Guidelines and the Purchase Preference Policy prescribed by the Government of India for procurement of medicines were not followed. No pre-despatch or post-despatch inspections of drug kits, surgical kits and Accredited Social Health Activists’ drug kits were conducted. Non levy of penalty for delayed supplies of medicines amounted to Rs 3.18 crore,” the report <br />said.<br /><br />* As per IPHS norms, seven specialists and nine staff nurses with supporting staff were required in each Community. Health Centre (CHC). Forty nine CHCs did not have any specialists, while 21 CHCs had less than the prescribed number of specialists and only one CHC had the full complement of specialists. As regards staff nurses, nine CHCs had nine or more staff nurses, 57 had less than nine and four CHCs had no staff nurse.<br /><br />* The CAG report also had suggested that the state-level action plan should be a part of the perspective plan and prepared only on the basis of consolidated action plans at the village, block and district-levels so that actual requirements are projected.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
CAG too was critical of NRHM implementation |
-IBN
The statement of the Union Minister of State for Health, Mullappally Ramachandran, the other day that the local bodies had failed to utilise National Rural Health Mission (NRHM) funds comes as no surprise.
* The last report of the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) on the implementation NRHM in Kerala had pointed out in detail the deficiencies such as absence of a perspective plan, accumulation of huge unspent funds in banks, diversion of funds, slow pace of upgradation work in some institutions and lack of medical and para-medical staff. * The CAG report has made it clear that no perspective plan for the mission period was prepared by the State Health and Family Welfare Society to ensure execution of projects along a critical path. Further more, the report states that NRHM funds of Rs 1.48 crore were spent during 2007-08 and 2008-09 for activities not approved by the Government of India in the annual programme implementation plans and Rs 51.86 lakh was diverted without Central approval. * The report pointed out that only sample household surveys were carried out in the three test-checked districts in the state, facility surveys required for identifying the healthcare needs of rural areas were conducted only in Community Health Centres though the guidelines stipulated that these were also to be carried out in Primary Health Centres and sub centres. * The report said that the management expenditure exceeded the prescribed limit of six per cent. ‘’Manpower, infrastructure and equipment in Community Health Centres and Primary Health Centres did not meet the Indian Public Health Standards despite upgradation through NRHM. Guidelines and the Purchase Preference Policy prescribed by the Government of India for procurement of medicines were not followed. No pre-despatch or post-despatch inspections of drug kits, surgical kits and Accredited Social Health Activists’ drug kits were conducted. Non levy of penalty for delayed supplies of medicines amounted to Rs 3.18 crore,” the report said. * As per IPHS norms, seven specialists and nine staff nurses with supporting staff were required in each Community. Health Centre (CHC). Forty nine CHCs did not have any specialists, while 21 CHCs had less than the prescribed number of specialists and only one CHC had the full complement of specialists. As regards staff nurses, nine CHCs had nine or more staff nurses, 57 had less than nine and four CHCs had no staff nurse. * The CAG report also had suggested that the state-level action plan should be a part of the perspective plan and prepared only on the basis of consolidated action plans at the village, block and district-levels so that actual requirements are projected. |