Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
if (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {
'status' => (int) 200,
'contentType' => 'text/html',
'headers' => [
'Content-Type' => [
[maximum depth reached]
]
],
'file' => null,
'fileRange' => [],
'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
'cacheDirectives' => [],
'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6813abb44c953-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6813abb44c953-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6813abb44c953-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6813abb44c953-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6813abb44c953-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6813abb44c953-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6813abb44c953-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6813abb44c953-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">>
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/>
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/>
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6813abb44c953-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 37268,
'title' => 'Can&#039;t disclose security expenditure of Amit Shah under RTI, says central information commission',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
-ThePrint.in<br />
<em><br />
Petitioner had sought information saying Shah had Z+ security cover since July 2014 even though he didn&rsquo;t hold constitutional or statutory office.<br />
<br />
New Delhi: </em>Expenses incurred on the security cover of BJP president Amit Shah cannot be disclosed, the Central Information Commission (CIC) has held citing RTI Act exemption clauses of &ldquo;personal information&rdquo; and &ldquo;safety&rdquo;.<br />
<br />
The commission has denied the appeal of a petitioner who had also sought to know the rules governing extension of security cover to a private individual and the authorities, which foot the bill of such cover to a private individual.<br />
<br />
The application was filed by Deepak Juneja on July 5, 2014, when Shah was not a member of the Rajya Sabha.<br />
<br />
He had also sought to know the list of people who have been given security by the government.<br />
<br />
The information was denied by the Home Ministry citing Section 8(1)(g) that exempts from disclosure information that would endanger the life or physical safety of any person.<br />
<br />
The ministry had also cited Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act, which exempts information that is personal, would cause unwarranted invasion of privacy and is not linked to any &ldquo;public activity&rdquo;.<br />
<br />
In its previous order in the matter, the CIC had upheld denial of information as it was not disclosed before Parliament.<br />
<br />
Please <a href="https://theprint.in/politics/cant-disclose-security-expenditure-of-amit-shah-under-rti-says-central-information-commission/105692/">click here</a> to read more.
</div>',
'credit_writer' => 'ThePrint.in, 26 August, 2018, https://theprint.in/politics/cant-disclose-security-expenditure-of-amit-shah-under-rti-says-central-information-commission/105692/',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'can039t-disclose-security-expenditure-of-amit-shah-under-rti-says-central-information-commission-4685386',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 4685386,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
},
'articleid' => (int) 37268,
'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Can&#039;t disclose security expenditure of Amit Shah under RTI, says central information commission',
'metaKeywords' => 'Right to Information,Right to Information (RTI),Right to Information Act,RTI Act,Central Information Commission (CIC),Z+ security cover,Amit Shah',
'metaDesc' => '
-ThePrint.in
Petitioner had sought information saying Shah had Z+ security cover since July 2014 even though he didn&rsquo;t hold constitutional or statutory office.
New Delhi: Expenses incurred on the security cover of BJP president Amit Shah cannot be disclosed, the Central Information...',
'disp' => '<div align="justify">-ThePrint.in<br /><em><br />Petitioner had sought information saying Shah had Z+ security cover since July 2014 even though he didn&rsquo;t hold constitutional or statutory office.<br /><br />New Delhi: </em>Expenses incurred on the security cover of BJP president Amit Shah cannot be disclosed, the Central Information Commission (CIC) has held citing RTI Act exemption clauses of &ldquo;personal information&rdquo; and &ldquo;safety&rdquo;.<br /><br />The commission has denied the appeal of a petitioner who had also sought to know the rules governing extension of security cover to a private individual and the authorities, which foot the bill of such cover to a private individual.<br /><br />The application was filed by Deepak Juneja on July 5, 2014, when Shah was not a member of the Rajya Sabha.<br /><br />He had also sought to know the list of people who have been given security by the government.<br /><br />The information was denied by the Home Ministry citing Section 8(1)(g) that exempts from disclosure information that would endanger the life or physical safety of any person.<br /><br />The ministry had also cited Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act, which exempts information that is personal, would cause unwarranted invasion of privacy and is not linked to any &ldquo;public activity&rdquo;.<br /><br />In its previous order in the matter, the CIC had upheld denial of information as it was not disclosed before Parliament.<br /><br />Please <a href="https://theprint.in/politics/cant-disclose-security-expenditure-of-amit-shah-under-rti-says-central-information-commission/105692/" title="https://theprint.in/politics/cant-disclose-security-expenditure-of-amit-shah-under-rti-says-central-information-commission/105692/">click here</a> to read more.</div>',
'lang' => 'English',
'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
'site_title' => 'im4change',
'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 37268,
'title' => 'Can&#039;t disclose security expenditure of Amit Shah under RTI, says central information commission',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
-ThePrint.in<br />
<em><br />
Petitioner had sought information saying Shah had Z+ security cover since July 2014 even though he didn&rsquo;t hold constitutional or statutory office.<br />
<br />
New Delhi: </em>Expenses incurred on the security cover of BJP president Amit Shah cannot be disclosed, the Central Information Commission (CIC) has held citing RTI Act exemption clauses of &ldquo;personal information&rdquo; and &ldquo;safety&rdquo;.<br />
<br />
The commission has denied the appeal of a petitioner who had also sought to know the rules governing extension of security cover to a private individual and the authorities, which foot the bill of such cover to a private individual.<br />
<br />
The application was filed by Deepak Juneja on July 5, 2014, when Shah was not a member of the Rajya Sabha.<br />
<br />
He had also sought to know the list of people who have been given security by the government.<br />
<br />
The information was denied by the Home Ministry citing Section 8(1)(g) that exempts from disclosure information that would endanger the life or physical safety of any person.<br />
<br />
The ministry had also cited Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act, which exempts information that is personal, would cause unwarranted invasion of privacy and is not linked to any &ldquo;public activity&rdquo;.<br />
<br />
In its previous order in the matter, the CIC had upheld denial of information as it was not disclosed before Parliament.<br />
<br />
Please <a href="https://theprint.in/politics/cant-disclose-security-expenditure-of-amit-shah-under-rti-says-central-information-commission/105692/">click here</a> to read more.
</div>',
'credit_writer' => 'ThePrint.in, 26 August, 2018, https://theprint.in/politics/cant-disclose-security-expenditure-of-amit-shah-under-rti-says-central-information-commission/105692/',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'can039t-disclose-security-expenditure-of-amit-shah-under-rti-says-central-information-commission-4685386',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 4685386,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 5 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 6 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
'*' => true,
'id' => false
],
'[dirty]' => [],
'[original]' => [],
'[virtual]' => [],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [],
'[invalid]' => [],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
}
$articleid = (int) 37268
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Can&#039;t disclose security expenditure of Amit Shah under RTI, says central information commission'
$metaKeywords = 'Right to Information,Right to Information (RTI),Right to Information Act,RTI Act,Central Information Commission (CIC),Z+ security cover,Amit Shah'
$metaDesc = '
-ThePrint.in
Petitioner had sought information saying Shah had Z+ security cover since July 2014 even though he didn&rsquo;t hold constitutional or statutory office.
New Delhi: Expenses incurred on the security cover of BJP president Amit Shah cannot be disclosed, the Central Information...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-ThePrint.in<br /><em><br />Petitioner had sought information saying Shah had Z+ security cover since July 2014 even though he didn&rsquo;t hold constitutional or statutory office.<br /><br />New Delhi: </em>Expenses incurred on the security cover of BJP president Amit Shah cannot be disclosed, the Central Information Commission (CIC) has held citing RTI Act exemption clauses of &ldquo;personal information&rdquo; and &ldquo;safety&rdquo;.<br /><br />The commission has denied the appeal of a petitioner who had also sought to know the rules governing extension of security cover to a private individual and the authorities, which foot the bill of such cover to a private individual.<br /><br />The application was filed by Deepak Juneja on July 5, 2014, when Shah was not a member of the Rajya Sabha.<br /><br />He had also sought to know the list of people who have been given security by the government.<br /><br />The information was denied by the Home Ministry citing Section 8(1)(g) that exempts from disclosure information that would endanger the life or physical safety of any person.<br /><br />The ministry had also cited Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act, which exempts information that is personal, would cause unwarranted invasion of privacy and is not linked to any &ldquo;public activity&rdquo;.<br /><br />In its previous order in the matter, the CIC had upheld denial of information as it was not disclosed before Parliament.<br /><br />Please <a href="https://theprint.in/politics/cant-disclose-security-expenditure-of-amit-shah-under-rti-says-central-information-commission/105692/" title="https://theprint.in/politics/cant-disclose-security-expenditure-of-amit-shah-under-rti-says-central-information-commission/105692/">click here</a> to read more.</div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/can039t-disclose-security-expenditure-of-amit-shah-under-rti-says-central-information-commission-4685386.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
<link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
media="all"/>
<title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Can't disclose security expenditure of Amit Shah under RTI, says central information commission | Im4change.org</title>
<meta name="description" content="
-ThePrint.in
Petitioner had sought information saying Shah had Z+ security cover since July 2014 even though he didn’t hold constitutional or statutory office.
New Delhi: Expenses incurred on the security cover of BJP president Amit Shah cannot be disclosed, the Central Information..."/>
<script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
<script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">
$(document).ready(function () {
var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
$("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
.attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
.load(function () {
pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not
pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
});
});
</script>
<style type="text/css">
@media screen {
div.divFooter {
display: block;
}
}
@media print {
.printbutton {
display: none !important;
}
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
<tr>
<td class="top_bg">
<div class="divFooter">
<img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="topspace"> </td>
</tr>
<tr id="topspace">
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%">
<h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
<strong>Can't disclose security expenditure of Amit Shah under RTI, says central information commission</strong></h1>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
<div align="justify">-ThePrint.in<br /><em><br />Petitioner had sought information saying Shah had Z+ security cover since July 2014 even though he didn’t hold constitutional or statutory office.<br /><br />New Delhi: </em>Expenses incurred on the security cover of BJP president Amit Shah cannot be disclosed, the Central Information Commission (CIC) has held citing RTI Act exemption clauses of “personal information” and “safety”.<br /><br />The commission has denied the appeal of a petitioner who had also sought to know the rules governing extension of security cover to a private individual and the authorities, which foot the bill of such cover to a private individual.<br /><br />The application was filed by Deepak Juneja on July 5, 2014, when Shah was not a member of the Rajya Sabha.<br /><br />He had also sought to know the list of people who have been given security by the government.<br /><br />The information was denied by the Home Ministry citing Section 8(1)(g) that exempts from disclosure information that would endanger the life or physical safety of any person.<br /><br />The ministry had also cited Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act, which exempts information that is personal, would cause unwarranted invasion of privacy and is not linked to any “public activity”.<br /><br />In its previous order in the matter, the CIC had upheld denial of information as it was not disclosed before Parliament.<br /><br />Please <a href="https://theprint.in/politics/cant-disclose-security-expenditure-of-amit-shah-under-rti-says-central-information-commission/105692/" title="https://theprint.in/politics/cant-disclose-security-expenditure-of-amit-shah-under-rti-says-central-information-commission/105692/">click here</a> to read more.</div> </font>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
</table></body>
</html>'
}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {
'status' => (int) 200,
'contentType' => 'text/html',
'headers' => [
'Content-Type' => [
[maximum depth reached]
]
],
'file' => null,
'fileRange' => [],
'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
'cacheDirectives' => [],
'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6813abb44c953-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6813abb44c953-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6813abb44c953-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6813abb44c953-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6813abb44c953-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6813abb44c953-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6813abb44c953-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6813abb44c953-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">>
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/>
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/>
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6813abb44c953-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 37268,
'title' => 'Can&#039;t disclose security expenditure of Amit Shah under RTI, says central information commission',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
-ThePrint.in<br />
<em><br />
Petitioner had sought information saying Shah had Z+ security cover since July 2014 even though he didn&rsquo;t hold constitutional or statutory office.<br />
<br />
New Delhi: </em>Expenses incurred on the security cover of BJP president Amit Shah cannot be disclosed, the Central Information Commission (CIC) has held citing RTI Act exemption clauses of &ldquo;personal information&rdquo; and &ldquo;safety&rdquo;.<br />
<br />
The commission has denied the appeal of a petitioner who had also sought to know the rules governing extension of security cover to a private individual and the authorities, which foot the bill of such cover to a private individual.<br />
<br />
The application was filed by Deepak Juneja on July 5, 2014, when Shah was not a member of the Rajya Sabha.<br />
<br />
He had also sought to know the list of people who have been given security by the government.<br />
<br />
The information was denied by the Home Ministry citing Section 8(1)(g) that exempts from disclosure information that would endanger the life or physical safety of any person.<br />
<br />
The ministry had also cited Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act, which exempts information that is personal, would cause unwarranted invasion of privacy and is not linked to any &ldquo;public activity&rdquo;.<br />
<br />
In its previous order in the matter, the CIC had upheld denial of information as it was not disclosed before Parliament.<br />
<br />
Please <a href="https://theprint.in/politics/cant-disclose-security-expenditure-of-amit-shah-under-rti-says-central-information-commission/105692/">click here</a> to read more.
</div>',
'credit_writer' => 'ThePrint.in, 26 August, 2018, https://theprint.in/politics/cant-disclose-security-expenditure-of-amit-shah-under-rti-says-central-information-commission/105692/',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'can039t-disclose-security-expenditure-of-amit-shah-under-rti-says-central-information-commission-4685386',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 4685386,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
},
'articleid' => (int) 37268,
'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Can&#039;t disclose security expenditure of Amit Shah under RTI, says central information commission',
'metaKeywords' => 'Right to Information,Right to Information (RTI),Right to Information Act,RTI Act,Central Information Commission (CIC),Z+ security cover,Amit Shah',
'metaDesc' => '
-ThePrint.in
Petitioner had sought information saying Shah had Z+ security cover since July 2014 even though he didn&rsquo;t hold constitutional or statutory office.
New Delhi: Expenses incurred on the security cover of BJP president Amit Shah cannot be disclosed, the Central Information...',
'disp' => '<div align="justify">-ThePrint.in<br /><em><br />Petitioner had sought information saying Shah had Z+ security cover since July 2014 even though he didn&rsquo;t hold constitutional or statutory office.<br /><br />New Delhi: </em>Expenses incurred on the security cover of BJP president Amit Shah cannot be disclosed, the Central Information Commission (CIC) has held citing RTI Act exemption clauses of &ldquo;personal information&rdquo; and &ldquo;safety&rdquo;.<br /><br />The commission has denied the appeal of a petitioner who had also sought to know the rules governing extension of security cover to a private individual and the authorities, which foot the bill of such cover to a private individual.<br /><br />The application was filed by Deepak Juneja on July 5, 2014, when Shah was not a member of the Rajya Sabha.<br /><br />He had also sought to know the list of people who have been given security by the government.<br /><br />The information was denied by the Home Ministry citing Section 8(1)(g) that exempts from disclosure information that would endanger the life or physical safety of any person.<br /><br />The ministry had also cited Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act, which exempts information that is personal, would cause unwarranted invasion of privacy and is not linked to any &ldquo;public activity&rdquo;.<br /><br />In its previous order in the matter, the CIC had upheld denial of information as it was not disclosed before Parliament.<br /><br />Please <a href="https://theprint.in/politics/cant-disclose-security-expenditure-of-amit-shah-under-rti-says-central-information-commission/105692/" title="https://theprint.in/politics/cant-disclose-security-expenditure-of-amit-shah-under-rti-says-central-information-commission/105692/">click here</a> to read more.</div>',
'lang' => 'English',
'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
'site_title' => 'im4change',
'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 37268,
'title' => 'Can&#039;t disclose security expenditure of Amit Shah under RTI, says central information commission',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
-ThePrint.in<br />
<em><br />
Petitioner had sought information saying Shah had Z+ security cover since July 2014 even though he didn&rsquo;t hold constitutional or statutory office.<br />
<br />
New Delhi: </em>Expenses incurred on the security cover of BJP president Amit Shah cannot be disclosed, the Central Information Commission (CIC) has held citing RTI Act exemption clauses of &ldquo;personal information&rdquo; and &ldquo;safety&rdquo;.<br />
<br />
The commission has denied the appeal of a petitioner who had also sought to know the rules governing extension of security cover to a private individual and the authorities, which foot the bill of such cover to a private individual.<br />
<br />
The application was filed by Deepak Juneja on July 5, 2014, when Shah was not a member of the Rajya Sabha.<br />
<br />
He had also sought to know the list of people who have been given security by the government.<br />
<br />
The information was denied by the Home Ministry citing Section 8(1)(g) that exempts from disclosure information that would endanger the life or physical safety of any person.<br />
<br />
The ministry had also cited Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act, which exempts information that is personal, would cause unwarranted invasion of privacy and is not linked to any &ldquo;public activity&rdquo;.<br />
<br />
In its previous order in the matter, the CIC had upheld denial of information as it was not disclosed before Parliament.<br />
<br />
Please <a href="https://theprint.in/politics/cant-disclose-security-expenditure-of-amit-shah-under-rti-says-central-information-commission/105692/">click here</a> to read more.
</div>',
'credit_writer' => 'ThePrint.in, 26 August, 2018, https://theprint.in/politics/cant-disclose-security-expenditure-of-amit-shah-under-rti-says-central-information-commission/105692/',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'can039t-disclose-security-expenditure-of-amit-shah-under-rti-says-central-information-commission-4685386',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 4685386,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 5 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 6 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
'*' => true,
'id' => false
],
'[dirty]' => [],
'[original]' => [],
'[virtual]' => [],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [],
'[invalid]' => [],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
}
$articleid = (int) 37268
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Can&#039;t disclose security expenditure of Amit Shah under RTI, says central information commission'
$metaKeywords = 'Right to Information,Right to Information (RTI),Right to Information Act,RTI Act,Central Information Commission (CIC),Z+ security cover,Amit Shah'
$metaDesc = '
-ThePrint.in
Petitioner had sought information saying Shah had Z+ security cover since July 2014 even though he didn&rsquo;t hold constitutional or statutory office.
New Delhi: Expenses incurred on the security cover of BJP president Amit Shah cannot be disclosed, the Central Information...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-ThePrint.in<br /><em><br />Petitioner had sought information saying Shah had Z+ security cover since July 2014 even though he didn&rsquo;t hold constitutional or statutory office.<br /><br />New Delhi: </em>Expenses incurred on the security cover of BJP president Amit Shah cannot be disclosed, the Central Information Commission (CIC) has held citing RTI Act exemption clauses of &ldquo;personal information&rdquo; and &ldquo;safety&rdquo;.<br /><br />The commission has denied the appeal of a petitioner who had also sought to know the rules governing extension of security cover to a private individual and the authorities, which foot the bill of such cover to a private individual.<br /><br />The application was filed by Deepak Juneja on July 5, 2014, when Shah was not a member of the Rajya Sabha.<br /><br />He had also sought to know the list of people who have been given security by the government.<br /><br />The information was denied by the Home Ministry citing Section 8(1)(g) that exempts from disclosure information that would endanger the life or physical safety of any person.<br /><br />The ministry had also cited Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act, which exempts information that is personal, would cause unwarranted invasion of privacy and is not linked to any &ldquo;public activity&rdquo;.<br /><br />In its previous order in the matter, the CIC had upheld denial of information as it was not disclosed before Parliament.<br /><br />Please <a href="https://theprint.in/politics/cant-disclose-security-expenditure-of-amit-shah-under-rti-says-central-information-commission/105692/" title="https://theprint.in/politics/cant-disclose-security-expenditure-of-amit-shah-under-rti-says-central-information-commission/105692/">click here</a> to read more.</div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/can039t-disclose-security-expenditure-of-amit-shah-under-rti-says-central-information-commission-4685386.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
<link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
media="all"/>
<title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Can't disclose security expenditure of Amit Shah under RTI, says central information commission | Im4change.org</title>
<meta name="description" content="
-ThePrint.in
Petitioner had sought information saying Shah had Z+ security cover since July 2014 even though he didn’t hold constitutional or statutory office.
New Delhi: Expenses incurred on the security cover of BJP president Amit Shah cannot be disclosed, the Central Information..."/>
<script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
<script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">
$(document).ready(function () {
var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
$("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
.attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
.load(function () {
pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not
pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
});
});
</script>
<style type="text/css">
@media screen {
div.divFooter {
display: block;
}
}
@media print {
.printbutton {
display: none !important;
}
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
<tr>
<td class="top_bg">
<div class="divFooter">
<img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="topspace"> </td>
</tr>
<tr id="topspace">
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%">
<h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
<strong>Can't disclose security expenditure of Amit Shah under RTI, says central information commission</strong></h1>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
<div align="justify">-ThePrint.in<br /><em><br />Petitioner had sought information saying Shah had Z+ security cover since July 2014 even though he didn’t hold constitutional or statutory office.<br /><br />New Delhi: </em>Expenses incurred on the security cover of BJP president Amit Shah cannot be disclosed, the Central Information Commission (CIC) has held citing RTI Act exemption clauses of “personal information” and “safety”.<br /><br />The commission has denied the appeal of a petitioner who had also sought to know the rules governing extension of security cover to a private individual and the authorities, which foot the bill of such cover to a private individual.<br /><br />The application was filed by Deepak Juneja on July 5, 2014, when Shah was not a member of the Rajya Sabha.<br /><br />He had also sought to know the list of people who have been given security by the government.<br /><br />The information was denied by the Home Ministry citing Section 8(1)(g) that exempts from disclosure information that would endanger the life or physical safety of any person.<br /><br />The ministry had also cited Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act, which exempts information that is personal, would cause unwarranted invasion of privacy and is not linked to any “public activity”.<br /><br />In its previous order in the matter, the CIC had upheld denial of information as it was not disclosed before Parliament.<br /><br />Please <a href="https://theprint.in/politics/cant-disclose-security-expenditure-of-amit-shah-under-rti-says-central-information-commission/105692/" title="https://theprint.in/politics/cant-disclose-security-expenditure-of-amit-shah-under-rti-says-central-information-commission/105692/">click here</a> to read more.</div> </font>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
</table></body>
</html>'
}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {
'status' => (int) 200,
'contentType' => 'text/html',
'headers' => [
'Content-Type' => [
[maximum depth reached]
]
],
'file' => null,
'fileRange' => [],
'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
'cacheDirectives' => [],
'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6813abb44c953-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6813abb44c953-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6813abb44c953-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6813abb44c953-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6813abb44c953-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6813abb44c953-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6813abb44c953-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6813abb44c953-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">>
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/>
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/>
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6813abb44c953-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 37268,
'title' => 'Can&#039;t disclose security expenditure of Amit Shah under RTI, says central information commission',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
-ThePrint.in<br />
<em><br />
Petitioner had sought information saying Shah had Z+ security cover since July 2014 even though he didn&rsquo;t hold constitutional or statutory office.<br />
<br />
New Delhi: </em>Expenses incurred on the security cover of BJP president Amit Shah cannot be disclosed, the Central Information Commission (CIC) has held citing RTI Act exemption clauses of &ldquo;personal information&rdquo; and &ldquo;safety&rdquo;.<br />
<br />
The commission has denied the appeal of a petitioner who had also sought to know the rules governing extension of security cover to a private individual and the authorities, which foot the bill of such cover to a private individual.<br />
<br />
The application was filed by Deepak Juneja on July 5, 2014, when Shah was not a member of the Rajya Sabha.<br />
<br />
He had also sought to know the list of people who have been given security by the government.<br />
<br />
The information was denied by the Home Ministry citing Section 8(1)(g) that exempts from disclosure information that would endanger the life or physical safety of any person.<br />
<br />
The ministry had also cited Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act, which exempts information that is personal, would cause unwarranted invasion of privacy and is not linked to any &ldquo;public activity&rdquo;.<br />
<br />
In its previous order in the matter, the CIC had upheld denial of information as it was not disclosed before Parliament.<br />
<br />
Please <a href="https://theprint.in/politics/cant-disclose-security-expenditure-of-amit-shah-under-rti-says-central-information-commission/105692/">click here</a> to read more.
</div>',
'credit_writer' => 'ThePrint.in, 26 August, 2018, https://theprint.in/politics/cant-disclose-security-expenditure-of-amit-shah-under-rti-says-central-information-commission/105692/',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'can039t-disclose-security-expenditure-of-amit-shah-under-rti-says-central-information-commission-4685386',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 4685386,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
},
'articleid' => (int) 37268,
'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Can&#039;t disclose security expenditure of Amit Shah under RTI, says central information commission',
'metaKeywords' => 'Right to Information,Right to Information (RTI),Right to Information Act,RTI Act,Central Information Commission (CIC),Z+ security cover,Amit Shah',
'metaDesc' => '
-ThePrint.in
Petitioner had sought information saying Shah had Z+ security cover since July 2014 even though he didn&rsquo;t hold constitutional or statutory office.
New Delhi: Expenses incurred on the security cover of BJP president Amit Shah cannot be disclosed, the Central Information...',
'disp' => '<div align="justify">-ThePrint.in<br /><em><br />Petitioner had sought information saying Shah had Z+ security cover since July 2014 even though he didn&rsquo;t hold constitutional or statutory office.<br /><br />New Delhi: </em>Expenses incurred on the security cover of BJP president Amit Shah cannot be disclosed, the Central Information Commission (CIC) has held citing RTI Act exemption clauses of &ldquo;personal information&rdquo; and &ldquo;safety&rdquo;.<br /><br />The commission has denied the appeal of a petitioner who had also sought to know the rules governing extension of security cover to a private individual and the authorities, which foot the bill of such cover to a private individual.<br /><br />The application was filed by Deepak Juneja on July 5, 2014, when Shah was not a member of the Rajya Sabha.<br /><br />He had also sought to know the list of people who have been given security by the government.<br /><br />The information was denied by the Home Ministry citing Section 8(1)(g) that exempts from disclosure information that would endanger the life or physical safety of any person.<br /><br />The ministry had also cited Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act, which exempts information that is personal, would cause unwarranted invasion of privacy and is not linked to any &ldquo;public activity&rdquo;.<br /><br />In its previous order in the matter, the CIC had upheld denial of information as it was not disclosed before Parliament.<br /><br />Please <a href="https://theprint.in/politics/cant-disclose-security-expenditure-of-amit-shah-under-rti-says-central-information-commission/105692/" title="https://theprint.in/politics/cant-disclose-security-expenditure-of-amit-shah-under-rti-says-central-information-commission/105692/">click here</a> to read more.</div>',
'lang' => 'English',
'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
'site_title' => 'im4change',
'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 37268,
'title' => 'Can&#039;t disclose security expenditure of Amit Shah under RTI, says central information commission',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
-ThePrint.in<br />
<em><br />
Petitioner had sought information saying Shah had Z+ security cover since July 2014 even though he didn&rsquo;t hold constitutional or statutory office.<br />
<br />
New Delhi: </em>Expenses incurred on the security cover of BJP president Amit Shah cannot be disclosed, the Central Information Commission (CIC) has held citing RTI Act exemption clauses of &ldquo;personal information&rdquo; and &ldquo;safety&rdquo;.<br />
<br />
The commission has denied the appeal of a petitioner who had also sought to know the rules governing extension of security cover to a private individual and the authorities, which foot the bill of such cover to a private individual.<br />
<br />
The application was filed by Deepak Juneja on July 5, 2014, when Shah was not a member of the Rajya Sabha.<br />
<br />
He had also sought to know the list of people who have been given security by the government.<br />
<br />
The information was denied by the Home Ministry citing Section 8(1)(g) that exempts from disclosure information that would endanger the life or physical safety of any person.<br />
<br />
The ministry had also cited Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act, which exempts information that is personal, would cause unwarranted invasion of privacy and is not linked to any &ldquo;public activity&rdquo;.<br />
<br />
In its previous order in the matter, the CIC had upheld denial of information as it was not disclosed before Parliament.<br />
<br />
Please <a href="https://theprint.in/politics/cant-disclose-security-expenditure-of-amit-shah-under-rti-says-central-information-commission/105692/">click here</a> to read more.
</div>',
'credit_writer' => 'ThePrint.in, 26 August, 2018, https://theprint.in/politics/cant-disclose-security-expenditure-of-amit-shah-under-rti-says-central-information-commission/105692/',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'can039t-disclose-security-expenditure-of-amit-shah-under-rti-says-central-information-commission-4685386',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 4685386,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 5 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 6 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
'*' => true,
'id' => false
],
'[dirty]' => [],
'[original]' => [],
'[virtual]' => [],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [],
'[invalid]' => [],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
}
$articleid = (int) 37268
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Can&#039;t disclose security expenditure of Amit Shah under RTI, says central information commission'
$metaKeywords = 'Right to Information,Right to Information (RTI),Right to Information Act,RTI Act,Central Information Commission (CIC),Z+ security cover,Amit Shah'
$metaDesc = '
-ThePrint.in
Petitioner had sought information saying Shah had Z+ security cover since July 2014 even though he didn&rsquo;t hold constitutional or statutory office.
New Delhi: Expenses incurred on the security cover of BJP president Amit Shah cannot be disclosed, the Central Information...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-ThePrint.in<br /><em><br />Petitioner had sought information saying Shah had Z+ security cover since July 2014 even though he didn&rsquo;t hold constitutional or statutory office.<br /><br />New Delhi: </em>Expenses incurred on the security cover of BJP president Amit Shah cannot be disclosed, the Central Information Commission (CIC) has held citing RTI Act exemption clauses of &ldquo;personal information&rdquo; and &ldquo;safety&rdquo;.<br /><br />The commission has denied the appeal of a petitioner who had also sought to know the rules governing extension of security cover to a private individual and the authorities, which foot the bill of such cover to a private individual.<br /><br />The application was filed by Deepak Juneja on July 5, 2014, when Shah was not a member of the Rajya Sabha.<br /><br />He had also sought to know the list of people who have been given security by the government.<br /><br />The information was denied by the Home Ministry citing Section 8(1)(g) that exempts from disclosure information that would endanger the life or physical safety of any person.<br /><br />The ministry had also cited Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act, which exempts information that is personal, would cause unwarranted invasion of privacy and is not linked to any &ldquo;public activity&rdquo;.<br /><br />In its previous order in the matter, the CIC had upheld denial of information as it was not disclosed before Parliament.<br /><br />Please <a href="https://theprint.in/politics/cant-disclose-security-expenditure-of-amit-shah-under-rti-says-central-information-commission/105692/" title="https://theprint.in/politics/cant-disclose-security-expenditure-of-amit-shah-under-rti-says-central-information-commission/105692/">click here</a> to read more.</div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/can039t-disclose-security-expenditure-of-amit-shah-under-rti-says-central-information-commission-4685386.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
<link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
media="all"/>
<title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Can't disclose security expenditure of Amit Shah under RTI, says central information commission | Im4change.org</title>
<meta name="description" content="
-ThePrint.in
Petitioner had sought information saying Shah had Z+ security cover since July 2014 even though he didn’t hold constitutional or statutory office.
New Delhi: Expenses incurred on the security cover of BJP president Amit Shah cannot be disclosed, the Central Information..."/>
<script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
<script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">
$(document).ready(function () {
var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
$("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
.attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
.load(function () {
pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not
pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
});
});
</script>
<style type="text/css">
@media screen {
div.divFooter {
display: block;
}
}
@media print {
.printbutton {
display: none !important;
}
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
<tr>
<td class="top_bg">
<div class="divFooter">
<img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="topspace"> </td>
</tr>
<tr id="topspace">
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%">
<h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
<strong>Can't disclose security expenditure of Amit Shah under RTI, says central information commission</strong></h1>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
<div align="justify">-ThePrint.in<br /><em><br />Petitioner had sought information saying Shah had Z+ security cover since July 2014 even though he didn’t hold constitutional or statutory office.<br /><br />New Delhi: </em>Expenses incurred on the security cover of BJP president Amit Shah cannot be disclosed, the Central Information Commission (CIC) has held citing RTI Act exemption clauses of “personal information” and “safety”.<br /><br />The commission has denied the appeal of a petitioner who had also sought to know the rules governing extension of security cover to a private individual and the authorities, which foot the bill of such cover to a private individual.<br /><br />The application was filed by Deepak Juneja on July 5, 2014, when Shah was not a member of the Rajya Sabha.<br /><br />He had also sought to know the list of people who have been given security by the government.<br /><br />The information was denied by the Home Ministry citing Section 8(1)(g) that exempts from disclosure information that would endanger the life or physical safety of any person.<br /><br />The ministry had also cited Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act, which exempts information that is personal, would cause unwarranted invasion of privacy and is not linked to any “public activity”.<br /><br />In its previous order in the matter, the CIC had upheld denial of information as it was not disclosed before Parliament.<br /><br />Please <a href="https://theprint.in/politics/cant-disclose-security-expenditure-of-amit-shah-under-rti-says-central-information-commission/105692/" title="https://theprint.in/politics/cant-disclose-security-expenditure-of-amit-shah-under-rti-says-central-information-commission/105692/">click here</a> to read more.</div> </font>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
<form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
</td>
</tr>
</table></body>
</html>'
}
$cookies = []
$values = [
(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 37268,
'title' => 'Can't disclose security expenditure of Amit Shah under RTI, says central information commission',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
-ThePrint.in<br />
<em><br />
Petitioner had sought information saying Shah had Z+ security cover since July 2014 even though he didn’t hold constitutional or statutory office.<br />
<br />
New Delhi: </em>Expenses incurred on the security cover of BJP president Amit Shah cannot be disclosed, the Central Information Commission (CIC) has held citing RTI Act exemption clauses of “personal information” and “safety”.<br />
<br />
The commission has denied the appeal of a petitioner who had also sought to know the rules governing extension of security cover to a private individual and the authorities, which foot the bill of such cover to a private individual.<br />
<br />
The application was filed by Deepak Juneja on July 5, 2014, when Shah was not a member of the Rajya Sabha.<br />
<br />
He had also sought to know the list of people who have been given security by the government.<br />
<br />
The information was denied by the Home Ministry citing Section 8(1)(g) that exempts from disclosure information that would endanger the life or physical safety of any person.<br />
<br />
The ministry had also cited Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act, which exempts information that is personal, would cause unwarranted invasion of privacy and is not linked to any “public activity”.<br />
<br />
In its previous order in the matter, the CIC had upheld denial of information as it was not disclosed before Parliament.<br />
<br />
Please <a href="https://theprint.in/politics/cant-disclose-security-expenditure-of-amit-shah-under-rti-says-central-information-commission/105692/">click here</a> to read more.
</div>',
'credit_writer' => 'ThePrint.in, 26 August, 2018, https://theprint.in/politics/cant-disclose-security-expenditure-of-amit-shah-under-rti-says-central-information-commission/105692/',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'can039t-disclose-security-expenditure-of-amit-shah-under-rti-says-central-information-commission-4685386',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 4685386,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
[maximum depth reached]
],
'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
},
'articleid' => (int) 37268,
'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Can't disclose security expenditure of Amit Shah under RTI, says central information commission',
'metaKeywords' => 'Right to Information,Right to Information (RTI),Right to Information Act,RTI Act,Central Information Commission (CIC),Z+ security cover,Amit Shah',
'metaDesc' => '
-ThePrint.in
Petitioner had sought information saying Shah had Z+ security cover since July 2014 even though he didn’t hold constitutional or statutory office.
New Delhi: Expenses incurred on the security cover of BJP president Amit Shah cannot be disclosed, the Central Information...',
'disp' => '<div align="justify">-ThePrint.in<br /><em><br />Petitioner had sought information saying Shah had Z+ security cover since July 2014 even though he didn’t hold constitutional or statutory office.<br /><br />New Delhi: </em>Expenses incurred on the security cover of BJP president Amit Shah cannot be disclosed, the Central Information Commission (CIC) has held citing RTI Act exemption clauses of “personal information” and “safety”.<br /><br />The commission has denied the appeal of a petitioner who had also sought to know the rules governing extension of security cover to a private individual and the authorities, which foot the bill of such cover to a private individual.<br /><br />The application was filed by Deepak Juneja on July 5, 2014, when Shah was not a member of the Rajya Sabha.<br /><br />He had also sought to know the list of people who have been given security by the government.<br /><br />The information was denied by the Home Ministry citing Section 8(1)(g) that exempts from disclosure information that would endanger the life or physical safety of any person.<br /><br />The ministry had also cited Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act, which exempts information that is personal, would cause unwarranted invasion of privacy and is not linked to any “public activity”.<br /><br />In its previous order in the matter, the CIC had upheld denial of information as it was not disclosed before Parliament.<br /><br />Please <a href="https://theprint.in/politics/cant-disclose-security-expenditure-of-amit-shah-under-rti-says-central-information-commission/105692/" title="https://theprint.in/politics/cant-disclose-security-expenditure-of-amit-shah-under-rti-says-central-information-commission/105692/">click here</a> to read more.</div>',
'lang' => 'English',
'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
'site_title' => 'im4change',
'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {
'id' => (int) 37268,
'title' => 'Can't disclose security expenditure of Amit Shah under RTI, says central information commission',
'subheading' => '',
'description' => '<div align="justify">
-ThePrint.in<br />
<em><br />
Petitioner had sought information saying Shah had Z+ security cover since July 2014 even though he didn’t hold constitutional or statutory office.<br />
<br />
New Delhi: </em>Expenses incurred on the security cover of BJP president Amit Shah cannot be disclosed, the Central Information Commission (CIC) has held citing RTI Act exemption clauses of “personal information” and “safety”.<br />
<br />
The commission has denied the appeal of a petitioner who had also sought to know the rules governing extension of security cover to a private individual and the authorities, which foot the bill of such cover to a private individual.<br />
<br />
The application was filed by Deepak Juneja on July 5, 2014, when Shah was not a member of the Rajya Sabha.<br />
<br />
He had also sought to know the list of people who have been given security by the government.<br />
<br />
The information was denied by the Home Ministry citing Section 8(1)(g) that exempts from disclosure information that would endanger the life or physical safety of any person.<br />
<br />
The ministry had also cited Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act, which exempts information that is personal, would cause unwarranted invasion of privacy and is not linked to any “public activity”.<br />
<br />
In its previous order in the matter, the CIC had upheld denial of information as it was not disclosed before Parliament.<br />
<br />
Please <a href="https://theprint.in/politics/cant-disclose-security-expenditure-of-amit-shah-under-rti-says-central-information-commission/105692/">click here</a> to read more.
</div>',
'credit_writer' => 'ThePrint.in, 26 August, 2018, https://theprint.in/politics/cant-disclose-security-expenditure-of-amit-shah-under-rti-says-central-information-commission/105692/',
'article_img' => '',
'article_img_thumb' => '',
'status' => (int) 1,
'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
'lang' => 'EN',
'category_id' => (int) 16,
'tag_keyword' => '',
'seo_url' => 'can039t-disclose-security-expenditure-of-amit-shah-under-rti-says-central-information-commission-4685386',
'meta_title' => null,
'meta_keywords' => null,
'meta_description' => null,
'noindex' => (int) 0,
'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
'most_visit_section_id' => null,
'article_big_img' => null,
'liveid' => (int) 4685386,
'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
'edate' => '',
'tags' => [
(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 4 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 5 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
(int) 6 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
],
'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
'[new]' => false,
'[accessible]' => [
'*' => true,
'id' => false
],
'[dirty]' => [],
'[original]' => [],
'[virtual]' => [],
'[hasErrors]' => false,
'[errors]' => [],
'[invalid]' => [],
'[repository]' => 'Articles'
}
$articleid = (int) 37268
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Can't disclose security expenditure of Amit Shah under RTI, says central information commission'
$metaKeywords = 'Right to Information,Right to Information (RTI),Right to Information Act,RTI Act,Central Information Commission (CIC),Z+ security cover,Amit Shah'
$metaDesc = '
-ThePrint.in
Petitioner had sought information saying Shah had Z+ security cover since July 2014 even though he didn’t hold constitutional or statutory office.
New Delhi: Expenses incurred on the security cover of BJP president Amit Shah cannot be disclosed, the Central Information...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-ThePrint.in<br /><em><br />Petitioner had sought information saying Shah had Z+ security cover since July 2014 even though he didn’t hold constitutional or statutory office.<br /><br />New Delhi: </em>Expenses incurred on the security cover of BJP president Amit Shah cannot be disclosed, the Central Information Commission (CIC) has held citing RTI Act exemption clauses of “personal information” and “safety”.<br /><br />The commission has denied the appeal of a petitioner who had also sought to know the rules governing extension of security cover to a private individual and the authorities, which foot the bill of such cover to a private individual.<br /><br />The application was filed by Deepak Juneja on July 5, 2014, when Shah was not a member of the Rajya Sabha.<br /><br />He had also sought to know the list of people who have been given security by the government.<br /><br />The information was denied by the Home Ministry citing Section 8(1)(g) that exempts from disclosure information that would endanger the life or physical safety of any person.<br /><br />The ministry had also cited Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act, which exempts information that is personal, would cause unwarranted invasion of privacy and is not linked to any “public activity”.<br /><br />In its previous order in the matter, the CIC had upheld denial of information as it was not disclosed before Parliament.<br /><br />Please <a href="https://theprint.in/politics/cant-disclose-security-expenditure-of-amit-shah-under-rti-says-central-information-commission/105692/" title="https://theprint.in/politics/cant-disclose-security-expenditure-of-amit-shah-under-rti-says-central-information-commission/105692/">click here</a> to read more.</div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
latest-news-updates/can039t-disclose-security-expenditure-of-amit-shah-under-rti-says-central-information-commission-4685386.html"/>
LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Can't disclose security expenditure of Amit Shah under RTI, says central information commission | Im4change.org
Can't disclose security expenditure of Amit Shah under RTI, says central information commission
-ThePrint.in Petitioner had sought information saying Shah had Z+ security cover since July 2014 even though he didn’t hold constitutional or statutory office.
New Delhi: Expenses incurred on the security cover of BJP president Amit Shah cannot be disclosed, the Central Information Commission (CIC) has held citing RTI Act exemption clauses of “personal information” and “safety”.
The commission has denied the appeal of a petitioner who had also sought to know the rules governing extension of security cover to a private individual and the authorities, which foot the bill of such cover to a private individual.
The application was filed by Deepak Juneja on July 5, 2014, when Shah was not a member of the Rajya Sabha.
He had also sought to know the list of people who have been given security by the government.
The information was denied by the Home Ministry citing Section 8(1)(g) that exempts from disclosure information that would endanger the life or physical safety of any person.
The ministry had also cited Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act, which exempts information that is personal, would cause unwarranted invasion of privacy and is not linked to any “public activity”.
In its previous order in the matter, the CIC had upheld denial of information as it was not disclosed before Parliament.
