Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/can039t-invoke-scst-act-if-victim-not-abused-in-public-court-18135/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/can039t-invoke-scst-act-if-victim-not-abused-in-public-court-18135/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/can039t-invoke-scst-act-if-victim-not-abused-in-public-court-18135/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/can039t-invoke-scst-act-if-victim-not-abused-in-public-court-18135/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5a6d05a8e7-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5a6d05a8e7-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f5a6d05a8e7-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5a6d05a8e7-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5a6d05a8e7-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5a6d05a8e7-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5a6d05a8e7-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f5a6d05a8e7-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f5a6d05a8e7-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 18006, 'title' => 'Can&#039;t Invoke SC/ST Act If Victim Not Abused in Public: Court', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -Outlook </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> One cannot be prosecuted for hurling castiest abuses at a person from scheduled caste or tribe unless it is proved that the incident took place in &quot;full public view,&quot; a Delhi court has said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Additional Sessions Judge Rajnish Bhatnagar made the observation, referring to a provision of the Scheduled Castes and Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and discharging three members of a family of charges under the Act. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;From the bare reading of this section, it is apparent that the alleged abuses must have been given by the accused to the complainant in full 'public view'. In order to bring home the point that this ingredient is not fulfilled even if the allegations are found to be correct though the abuses have not been given in full public view,&quot; the court said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> It, however, clarified the accused, which included man, his wife and their son, be tried by a magisterial court under the IPC for allegedly hurting the complainant and wrongfully restraining him. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Initially, the accused were also charged for insulting and humiliating a member of scheduled caste member in violation of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;From the statement of complainant, it appears that when the incident took place, the complainant and only accused party were present at the spot and what transpired between them has not been alleged to have taken place within full public view. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;So in these facts and circumstances, it cannot be said that all the ingredients of...The Act are fulfilled in the instant case,&quot; the judge said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The FIR had alleged that the father-son duo had accosted the complainant in an inebriated state near their house at Sindhu village here on November 25, 2011 and had beaten him up. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Later, the woman too had joined them and made derogatory caste-based remarks against the complainant, it said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Absolving the accused of charges under the SC/ST Act, the court lent credence to a report of a police officer which said the allegations were &quot;baseless&quot; and &quot;motivated.&quot; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The ASJ, however, said the accused trio would be tried by a magisterial court for offences punishable under sections 323 (voluntarily causing hurt) and 341 (wrongful restrain) of the IPC. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Outlook, 15 November, 2012, http://news.outlookindia.com/items.aspx?artid=780825', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'can039t-invoke-scst-act-if-victim-not-abused-in-public-court-18135', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 18135, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 18006, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Can&#039;t Invoke SC/ST Act If Victim Not Abused in Public: Court', 'metaKeywords' => 'caste,Dalits,Law and Justice,Human Rights', 'metaDesc' => ' -Outlook One cannot be prosecuted for hurling castiest abuses at a person from scheduled caste or tribe unless it is proved that the incident took place in &quot;full public view,&quot; a Delhi court has said. Additional Sessions Judge Rajnish Bhatnagar made the...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-Outlook</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">One cannot be prosecuted for hurling castiest abuses at a person from scheduled caste or tribe unless it is proved that the incident took place in &quot;full public view,&quot; a Delhi court has said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Additional Sessions Judge Rajnish Bhatnagar made the observation, referring to a provision of the Scheduled Castes and Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and discharging three members of a family of charges under the Act.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;From the bare reading of this section, it is apparent that the alleged abuses must have been given by the accused to the complainant in full 'public view'. In order to bring home the point that this ingredient is not fulfilled even if the allegations are found to be correct though the abuses have not been given in full public view,&quot; the court said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It, however, clarified the accused, which included man, his wife and their son, be tried by a magisterial court under the IPC for allegedly hurting the complainant and wrongfully restraining him.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Initially, the accused were also charged for insulting and humiliating a member of scheduled caste member in violation of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;From the statement of complainant, it appears that when the incident took place, the complainant and only accused party were present at the spot and what transpired between them has not been alleged to have taken place within full public view.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;So in these facts and circumstances, it cannot be said that all the ingredients of...The Act are fulfilled in the instant case,&quot; the judge said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The FIR had alleged that the father-son duo had accosted the complainant in an inebriated state near their house at Sindhu village here on November 25, 2011 and had beaten him up.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Later, the woman too had joined them and made derogatory caste-based remarks against the complainant, it said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Absolving the accused of charges under the SC/ST Act, the court lent credence to a report of a police officer which said the allegations were &quot;baseless&quot; and &quot;motivated.&quot;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The ASJ, however, said the accused trio would be tried by a magisterial court for offences punishable under sections 323 (voluntarily causing hurt) and 341 (wrongful restrain) of the IPC.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 18006, 'title' => 'Can&#039;t Invoke SC/ST Act If Victim Not Abused in Public: Court', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -Outlook </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> One cannot be prosecuted for hurling castiest abuses at a person from scheduled caste or tribe unless it is proved that the incident took place in &quot;full public view,&quot; a Delhi court has said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Additional Sessions Judge Rajnish Bhatnagar made the observation, referring to a provision of the Scheduled Castes and Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and discharging three members of a family of charges under the Act. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;From the bare reading of this section, it is apparent that the alleged abuses must have been given by the accused to the complainant in full 'public view'. In order to bring home the point that this ingredient is not fulfilled even if the allegations are found to be correct though the abuses have not been given in full public view,&quot; the court said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> It, however, clarified the accused, which included man, his wife and their son, be tried by a magisterial court under the IPC for allegedly hurting the complainant and wrongfully restraining him. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Initially, the accused were also charged for insulting and humiliating a member of scheduled caste member in violation of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;From the statement of complainant, it appears that when the incident took place, the complainant and only accused party were present at the spot and what transpired between them has not been alleged to have taken place within full public view. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;So in these facts and circumstances, it cannot be said that all the ingredients of...The Act are fulfilled in the instant case,&quot; the judge said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The FIR had alleged that the father-son duo had accosted the complainant in an inebriated state near their house at Sindhu village here on November 25, 2011 and had beaten him up. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Later, the woman too had joined them and made derogatory caste-based remarks against the complainant, it said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Absolving the accused of charges under the SC/ST Act, the court lent credence to a report of a police officer which said the allegations were &quot;baseless&quot; and &quot;motivated.&quot; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The ASJ, however, said the accused trio would be tried by a magisterial court for offences punishable under sections 323 (voluntarily causing hurt) and 341 (wrongful restrain) of the IPC. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Outlook, 15 November, 2012, http://news.outlookindia.com/items.aspx?artid=780825', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'can039t-invoke-scst-act-if-victim-not-abused-in-public-court-18135', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 18135, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 18006 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Can&#039;t Invoke SC/ST Act If Victim Not Abused in Public: Court' $metaKeywords = 'caste,Dalits,Law and Justice,Human Rights' $metaDesc = ' -Outlook One cannot be prosecuted for hurling castiest abuses at a person from scheduled caste or tribe unless it is proved that the incident took place in &quot;full public view,&quot; a Delhi court has said. Additional Sessions Judge Rajnish Bhatnagar made the...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-Outlook</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">One cannot be prosecuted for hurling castiest abuses at a person from scheduled caste or tribe unless it is proved that the incident took place in &quot;full public view,&quot; a Delhi court has said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Additional Sessions Judge Rajnish Bhatnagar made the observation, referring to a provision of the Scheduled Castes and Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and discharging three members of a family of charges under the Act.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;From the bare reading of this section, it is apparent that the alleged abuses must have been given by the accused to the complainant in full 'public view'. In order to bring home the point that this ingredient is not fulfilled even if the allegations are found to be correct though the abuses have not been given in full public view,&quot; the court said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It, however, clarified the accused, which included man, his wife and their son, be tried by a magisterial court under the IPC for allegedly hurting the complainant and wrongfully restraining him.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Initially, the accused were also charged for insulting and humiliating a member of scheduled caste member in violation of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;From the statement of complainant, it appears that when the incident took place, the complainant and only accused party were present at the spot and what transpired between them has not been alleged to have taken place within full public view.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;So in these facts and circumstances, it cannot be said that all the ingredients of...The Act are fulfilled in the instant case,&quot; the judge said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The FIR had alleged that the father-son duo had accosted the complainant in an inebriated state near their house at Sindhu village here on November 25, 2011 and had beaten him up.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Later, the woman too had joined them and made derogatory caste-based remarks against the complainant, it said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Absolving the accused of charges under the SC/ST Act, the court lent credence to a report of a police officer which said the allegations were &quot;baseless&quot; and &quot;motivated.&quot;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The ASJ, however, said the accused trio would be tried by a magisterial court for offences punishable under sections 323 (voluntarily causing hurt) and 341 (wrongful restrain) of the IPC.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/can039t-invoke-scst-act-if-victim-not-abused-in-public-court-18135.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Can't Invoke SC/ST Act If Victim Not Abused in Public: Court | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -Outlook One cannot be prosecuted for hurling castiest abuses at a person from scheduled caste or tribe unless it is proved that the incident took place in "full public view," a Delhi court has said. Additional Sessions Judge Rajnish Bhatnagar made the..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Can't Invoke SC/ST Act If Victim Not Abused in Public: Court</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-Outlook</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">One cannot be prosecuted for hurling castiest abuses at a person from scheduled caste or tribe unless it is proved that the incident took place in "full public view," a Delhi court has said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Additional Sessions Judge Rajnish Bhatnagar made the observation, referring to a provision of the Scheduled Castes and Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and discharging three members of a family of charges under the Act.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"From the bare reading of this section, it is apparent that the alleged abuses must have been given by the accused to the complainant in full 'public view'. In order to bring home the point that this ingredient is not fulfilled even if the allegations are found to be correct though the abuses have not been given in full public view," the court said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It, however, clarified the accused, which included man, his wife and their son, be tried by a magisterial court under the IPC for allegedly hurting the complainant and wrongfully restraining him.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Initially, the accused were also charged for insulting and humiliating a member of scheduled caste member in violation of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"From the statement of complainant, it appears that when the incident took place, the complainant and only accused party were present at the spot and what transpired between them has not been alleged to have taken place within full public view.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"So in these facts and circumstances, it cannot be said that all the ingredients of...The Act are fulfilled in the instant case," the judge said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The FIR had alleged that the father-son duo had accosted the complainant in an inebriated state near their house at Sindhu village here on November 25, 2011 and had beaten him up.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Later, the woman too had joined them and made derogatory caste-based remarks against the complainant, it said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Absolving the accused of charges under the SC/ST Act, the court lent credence to a report of a police officer which said the allegations were "baseless" and "motivated."</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The ASJ, however, said the accused trio would be tried by a magisterial court for offences punishable under sections 323 (voluntarily causing hurt) and 341 (wrongful restrain) of the IPC.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5a6d05a8e7-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5a6d05a8e7-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f5a6d05a8e7-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5a6d05a8e7-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5a6d05a8e7-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5a6d05a8e7-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5a6d05a8e7-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f5a6d05a8e7-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f5a6d05a8e7-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 18006, 'title' => 'Can&#039;t Invoke SC/ST Act If Victim Not Abused in Public: Court', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -Outlook </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> One cannot be prosecuted for hurling castiest abuses at a person from scheduled caste or tribe unless it is proved that the incident took place in &quot;full public view,&quot; a Delhi court has said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Additional Sessions Judge Rajnish Bhatnagar made the observation, referring to a provision of the Scheduled Castes and Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and discharging three members of a family of charges under the Act. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;From the bare reading of this section, it is apparent that the alleged abuses must have been given by the accused to the complainant in full 'public view'. In order to bring home the point that this ingredient is not fulfilled even if the allegations are found to be correct though the abuses have not been given in full public view,&quot; the court said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> It, however, clarified the accused, which included man, his wife and their son, be tried by a magisterial court under the IPC for allegedly hurting the complainant and wrongfully restraining him. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Initially, the accused were also charged for insulting and humiliating a member of scheduled caste member in violation of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;From the statement of complainant, it appears that when the incident took place, the complainant and only accused party were present at the spot and what transpired between them has not been alleged to have taken place within full public view. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;So in these facts and circumstances, it cannot be said that all the ingredients of...The Act are fulfilled in the instant case,&quot; the judge said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The FIR had alleged that the father-son duo had accosted the complainant in an inebriated state near their house at Sindhu village here on November 25, 2011 and had beaten him up. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Later, the woman too had joined them and made derogatory caste-based remarks against the complainant, it said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Absolving the accused of charges under the SC/ST Act, the court lent credence to a report of a police officer which said the allegations were &quot;baseless&quot; and &quot;motivated.&quot; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The ASJ, however, said the accused trio would be tried by a magisterial court for offences punishable under sections 323 (voluntarily causing hurt) and 341 (wrongful restrain) of the IPC. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Outlook, 15 November, 2012, http://news.outlookindia.com/items.aspx?artid=780825', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'can039t-invoke-scst-act-if-victim-not-abused-in-public-court-18135', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 18135, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 18006, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Can&#039;t Invoke SC/ST Act If Victim Not Abused in Public: Court', 'metaKeywords' => 'caste,Dalits,Law and Justice,Human Rights', 'metaDesc' => ' -Outlook One cannot be prosecuted for hurling castiest abuses at a person from scheduled caste or tribe unless it is proved that the incident took place in &quot;full public view,&quot; a Delhi court has said. Additional Sessions Judge Rajnish Bhatnagar made the...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-Outlook</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">One cannot be prosecuted for hurling castiest abuses at a person from scheduled caste or tribe unless it is proved that the incident took place in &quot;full public view,&quot; a Delhi court has said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Additional Sessions Judge Rajnish Bhatnagar made the observation, referring to a provision of the Scheduled Castes and Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and discharging three members of a family of charges under the Act.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;From the bare reading of this section, it is apparent that the alleged abuses must have been given by the accused to the complainant in full 'public view'. In order to bring home the point that this ingredient is not fulfilled even if the allegations are found to be correct though the abuses have not been given in full public view,&quot; the court said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It, however, clarified the accused, which included man, his wife and their son, be tried by a magisterial court under the IPC for allegedly hurting the complainant and wrongfully restraining him.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Initially, the accused were also charged for insulting and humiliating a member of scheduled caste member in violation of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;From the statement of complainant, it appears that when the incident took place, the complainant and only accused party were present at the spot and what transpired between them has not been alleged to have taken place within full public view.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;So in these facts and circumstances, it cannot be said that all the ingredients of...The Act are fulfilled in the instant case,&quot; the judge said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The FIR had alleged that the father-son duo had accosted the complainant in an inebriated state near their house at Sindhu village here on November 25, 2011 and had beaten him up.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Later, the woman too had joined them and made derogatory caste-based remarks against the complainant, it said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Absolving the accused of charges under the SC/ST Act, the court lent credence to a report of a police officer which said the allegations were &quot;baseless&quot; and &quot;motivated.&quot;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The ASJ, however, said the accused trio would be tried by a magisterial court for offences punishable under sections 323 (voluntarily causing hurt) and 341 (wrongful restrain) of the IPC.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 18006, 'title' => 'Can&#039;t Invoke SC/ST Act If Victim Not Abused in Public: Court', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -Outlook </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> One cannot be prosecuted for hurling castiest abuses at a person from scheduled caste or tribe unless it is proved that the incident took place in &quot;full public view,&quot; a Delhi court has said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Additional Sessions Judge Rajnish Bhatnagar made the observation, referring to a provision of the Scheduled Castes and Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and discharging three members of a family of charges under the Act. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;From the bare reading of this section, it is apparent that the alleged abuses must have been given by the accused to the complainant in full 'public view'. In order to bring home the point that this ingredient is not fulfilled even if the allegations are found to be correct though the abuses have not been given in full public view,&quot; the court said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> It, however, clarified the accused, which included man, his wife and their son, be tried by a magisterial court under the IPC for allegedly hurting the complainant and wrongfully restraining him. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Initially, the accused were also charged for insulting and humiliating a member of scheduled caste member in violation of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;From the statement of complainant, it appears that when the incident took place, the complainant and only accused party were present at the spot and what transpired between them has not been alleged to have taken place within full public view. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;So in these facts and circumstances, it cannot be said that all the ingredients of...The Act are fulfilled in the instant case,&quot; the judge said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The FIR had alleged that the father-son duo had accosted the complainant in an inebriated state near their house at Sindhu village here on November 25, 2011 and had beaten him up. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Later, the woman too had joined them and made derogatory caste-based remarks against the complainant, it said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Absolving the accused of charges under the SC/ST Act, the court lent credence to a report of a police officer which said the allegations were &quot;baseless&quot; and &quot;motivated.&quot; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The ASJ, however, said the accused trio would be tried by a magisterial court for offences punishable under sections 323 (voluntarily causing hurt) and 341 (wrongful restrain) of the IPC. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Outlook, 15 November, 2012, http://news.outlookindia.com/items.aspx?artid=780825', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'can039t-invoke-scst-act-if-victim-not-abused-in-public-court-18135', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 18135, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 18006 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Can&#039;t Invoke SC/ST Act If Victim Not Abused in Public: Court' $metaKeywords = 'caste,Dalits,Law and Justice,Human Rights' $metaDesc = ' -Outlook One cannot be prosecuted for hurling castiest abuses at a person from scheduled caste or tribe unless it is proved that the incident took place in &quot;full public view,&quot; a Delhi court has said. Additional Sessions Judge Rajnish Bhatnagar made the...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-Outlook</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">One cannot be prosecuted for hurling castiest abuses at a person from scheduled caste or tribe unless it is proved that the incident took place in &quot;full public view,&quot; a Delhi court has said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Additional Sessions Judge Rajnish Bhatnagar made the observation, referring to a provision of the Scheduled Castes and Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and discharging three members of a family of charges under the Act.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;From the bare reading of this section, it is apparent that the alleged abuses must have been given by the accused to the complainant in full 'public view'. In order to bring home the point that this ingredient is not fulfilled even if the allegations are found to be correct though the abuses have not been given in full public view,&quot; the court said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It, however, clarified the accused, which included man, his wife and their son, be tried by a magisterial court under the IPC for allegedly hurting the complainant and wrongfully restraining him.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Initially, the accused were also charged for insulting and humiliating a member of scheduled caste member in violation of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;From the statement of complainant, it appears that when the incident took place, the complainant and only accused party were present at the spot and what transpired between them has not been alleged to have taken place within full public view.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;So in these facts and circumstances, it cannot be said that all the ingredients of...The Act are fulfilled in the instant case,&quot; the judge said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The FIR had alleged that the father-son duo had accosted the complainant in an inebriated state near their house at Sindhu village here on November 25, 2011 and had beaten him up.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Later, the woman too had joined them and made derogatory caste-based remarks against the complainant, it said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Absolving the accused of charges under the SC/ST Act, the court lent credence to a report of a police officer which said the allegations were &quot;baseless&quot; and &quot;motivated.&quot;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The ASJ, however, said the accused trio would be tried by a magisterial court for offences punishable under sections 323 (voluntarily causing hurt) and 341 (wrongful restrain) of the IPC.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/can039t-invoke-scst-act-if-victim-not-abused-in-public-court-18135.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Can't Invoke SC/ST Act If Victim Not Abused in Public: Court | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -Outlook One cannot be prosecuted for hurling castiest abuses at a person from scheduled caste or tribe unless it is proved that the incident took place in "full public view," a Delhi court has said. Additional Sessions Judge Rajnish Bhatnagar made the..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Can't Invoke SC/ST Act If Victim Not Abused in Public: Court</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-Outlook</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">One cannot be prosecuted for hurling castiest abuses at a person from scheduled caste or tribe unless it is proved that the incident took place in "full public view," a Delhi court has said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Additional Sessions Judge Rajnish Bhatnagar made the observation, referring to a provision of the Scheduled Castes and Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and discharging three members of a family of charges under the Act.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"From the bare reading of this section, it is apparent that the alleged abuses must have been given by the accused to the complainant in full 'public view'. In order to bring home the point that this ingredient is not fulfilled even if the allegations are found to be correct though the abuses have not been given in full public view," the court said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It, however, clarified the accused, which included man, his wife and their son, be tried by a magisterial court under the IPC for allegedly hurting the complainant and wrongfully restraining him.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Initially, the accused were also charged for insulting and humiliating a member of scheduled caste member in violation of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"From the statement of complainant, it appears that when the incident took place, the complainant and only accused party were present at the spot and what transpired between them has not been alleged to have taken place within full public view.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"So in these facts and circumstances, it cannot be said that all the ingredients of...The Act are fulfilled in the instant case," the judge said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The FIR had alleged that the father-son duo had accosted the complainant in an inebriated state near their house at Sindhu village here on November 25, 2011 and had beaten him up.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Later, the woman too had joined them and made derogatory caste-based remarks against the complainant, it said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Absolving the accused of charges under the SC/ST Act, the court lent credence to a report of a police officer which said the allegations were "baseless" and "motivated."</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The ASJ, however, said the accused trio would be tried by a magisterial court for offences punishable under sections 323 (voluntarily causing hurt) and 341 (wrongful restrain) of the IPC.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5a6d05a8e7-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5a6d05a8e7-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr67f5a6d05a8e7-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5a6d05a8e7-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5a6d05a8e7-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5a6d05a8e7-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr67f5a6d05a8e7-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr67f5a6d05a8e7-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr67f5a6d05a8e7-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 18006, 'title' => 'Can&#039;t Invoke SC/ST Act If Victim Not Abused in Public: Court', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -Outlook </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> One cannot be prosecuted for hurling castiest abuses at a person from scheduled caste or tribe unless it is proved that the incident took place in &quot;full public view,&quot; a Delhi court has said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Additional Sessions Judge Rajnish Bhatnagar made the observation, referring to a provision of the Scheduled Castes and Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and discharging three members of a family of charges under the Act. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;From the bare reading of this section, it is apparent that the alleged abuses must have been given by the accused to the complainant in full 'public view'. In order to bring home the point that this ingredient is not fulfilled even if the allegations are found to be correct though the abuses have not been given in full public view,&quot; the court said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> It, however, clarified the accused, which included man, his wife and their son, be tried by a magisterial court under the IPC for allegedly hurting the complainant and wrongfully restraining him. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Initially, the accused were also charged for insulting and humiliating a member of scheduled caste member in violation of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;From the statement of complainant, it appears that when the incident took place, the complainant and only accused party were present at the spot and what transpired between them has not been alleged to have taken place within full public view. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;So in these facts and circumstances, it cannot be said that all the ingredients of...The Act are fulfilled in the instant case,&quot; the judge said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The FIR had alleged that the father-son duo had accosted the complainant in an inebriated state near their house at Sindhu village here on November 25, 2011 and had beaten him up. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Later, the woman too had joined them and made derogatory caste-based remarks against the complainant, it said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Absolving the accused of charges under the SC/ST Act, the court lent credence to a report of a police officer which said the allegations were &quot;baseless&quot; and &quot;motivated.&quot; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The ASJ, however, said the accused trio would be tried by a magisterial court for offences punishable under sections 323 (voluntarily causing hurt) and 341 (wrongful restrain) of the IPC. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Outlook, 15 November, 2012, http://news.outlookindia.com/items.aspx?artid=780825', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'can039t-invoke-scst-act-if-victim-not-abused-in-public-court-18135', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 18135, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 18006, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Can&#039;t Invoke SC/ST Act If Victim Not Abused in Public: Court', 'metaKeywords' => 'caste,Dalits,Law and Justice,Human Rights', 'metaDesc' => ' -Outlook One cannot be prosecuted for hurling castiest abuses at a person from scheduled caste or tribe unless it is proved that the incident took place in &quot;full public view,&quot; a Delhi court has said. Additional Sessions Judge Rajnish Bhatnagar made the...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-Outlook</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">One cannot be prosecuted for hurling castiest abuses at a person from scheduled caste or tribe unless it is proved that the incident took place in &quot;full public view,&quot; a Delhi court has said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Additional Sessions Judge Rajnish Bhatnagar made the observation, referring to a provision of the Scheduled Castes and Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and discharging three members of a family of charges under the Act.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;From the bare reading of this section, it is apparent that the alleged abuses must have been given by the accused to the complainant in full 'public view'. In order to bring home the point that this ingredient is not fulfilled even if the allegations are found to be correct though the abuses have not been given in full public view,&quot; the court said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It, however, clarified the accused, which included man, his wife and their son, be tried by a magisterial court under the IPC for allegedly hurting the complainant and wrongfully restraining him.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Initially, the accused were also charged for insulting and humiliating a member of scheduled caste member in violation of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;From the statement of complainant, it appears that when the incident took place, the complainant and only accused party were present at the spot and what transpired between them has not been alleged to have taken place within full public view.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;So in these facts and circumstances, it cannot be said that all the ingredients of...The Act are fulfilled in the instant case,&quot; the judge said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The FIR had alleged that the father-son duo had accosted the complainant in an inebriated state near their house at Sindhu village here on November 25, 2011 and had beaten him up.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Later, the woman too had joined them and made derogatory caste-based remarks against the complainant, it said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Absolving the accused of charges under the SC/ST Act, the court lent credence to a report of a police officer which said the allegations were &quot;baseless&quot; and &quot;motivated.&quot;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The ASJ, however, said the accused trio would be tried by a magisterial court for offences punishable under sections 323 (voluntarily causing hurt) and 341 (wrongful restrain) of the IPC.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 18006, 'title' => 'Can&#039;t Invoke SC/ST Act If Victim Not Abused in Public: Court', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -Outlook </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> One cannot be prosecuted for hurling castiest abuses at a person from scheduled caste or tribe unless it is proved that the incident took place in &quot;full public view,&quot; a Delhi court has said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Additional Sessions Judge Rajnish Bhatnagar made the observation, referring to a provision of the Scheduled Castes and Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and discharging three members of a family of charges under the Act. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;From the bare reading of this section, it is apparent that the alleged abuses must have been given by the accused to the complainant in full 'public view'. In order to bring home the point that this ingredient is not fulfilled even if the allegations are found to be correct though the abuses have not been given in full public view,&quot; the court said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> It, however, clarified the accused, which included man, his wife and their son, be tried by a magisterial court under the IPC for allegedly hurting the complainant and wrongfully restraining him. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Initially, the accused were also charged for insulting and humiliating a member of scheduled caste member in violation of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;From the statement of complainant, it appears that when the incident took place, the complainant and only accused party were present at the spot and what transpired between them has not been alleged to have taken place within full public view. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> &quot;So in these facts and circumstances, it cannot be said that all the ingredients of...The Act are fulfilled in the instant case,&quot; the judge said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The FIR had alleged that the father-son duo had accosted the complainant in an inebriated state near their house at Sindhu village here on November 25, 2011 and had beaten him up. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Later, the woman too had joined them and made derogatory caste-based remarks against the complainant, it said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Absolving the accused of charges under the SC/ST Act, the court lent credence to a report of a police officer which said the allegations were &quot;baseless&quot; and &quot;motivated.&quot; </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The ASJ, however, said the accused trio would be tried by a magisterial court for offences punishable under sections 323 (voluntarily causing hurt) and 341 (wrongful restrain) of the IPC. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Outlook, 15 November, 2012, http://news.outlookindia.com/items.aspx?artid=780825', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'can039t-invoke-scst-act-if-victim-not-abused-in-public-court-18135', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 18135, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 18006 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Can&#039;t Invoke SC/ST Act If Victim Not Abused in Public: Court' $metaKeywords = 'caste,Dalits,Law and Justice,Human Rights' $metaDesc = ' -Outlook One cannot be prosecuted for hurling castiest abuses at a person from scheduled caste or tribe unless it is proved that the incident took place in &quot;full public view,&quot; a Delhi court has said. Additional Sessions Judge Rajnish Bhatnagar made the...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-Outlook</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">One cannot be prosecuted for hurling castiest abuses at a person from scheduled caste or tribe unless it is proved that the incident took place in &quot;full public view,&quot; a Delhi court has said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Additional Sessions Judge Rajnish Bhatnagar made the observation, referring to a provision of the Scheduled Castes and Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and discharging three members of a family of charges under the Act.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;From the bare reading of this section, it is apparent that the alleged abuses must have been given by the accused to the complainant in full 'public view'. In order to bring home the point that this ingredient is not fulfilled even if the allegations are found to be correct though the abuses have not been given in full public view,&quot; the court said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It, however, clarified the accused, which included man, his wife and their son, be tried by a magisterial court under the IPC for allegedly hurting the complainant and wrongfully restraining him.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Initially, the accused were also charged for insulting and humiliating a member of scheduled caste member in violation of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;From the statement of complainant, it appears that when the incident took place, the complainant and only accused party were present at the spot and what transpired between them has not been alleged to have taken place within full public view.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">&quot;So in these facts and circumstances, it cannot be said that all the ingredients of...The Act are fulfilled in the instant case,&quot; the judge said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The FIR had alleged that the father-son duo had accosted the complainant in an inebriated state near their house at Sindhu village here on November 25, 2011 and had beaten him up.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Later, the woman too had joined them and made derogatory caste-based remarks against the complainant, it said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Absolving the accused of charges under the SC/ST Act, the court lent credence to a report of a police officer which said the allegations were &quot;baseless&quot; and &quot;motivated.&quot;</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The ASJ, however, said the accused trio would be tried by a magisterial court for offences punishable under sections 323 (voluntarily causing hurt) and 341 (wrongful restrain) of the IPC.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/can039t-invoke-scst-act-if-victim-not-abused-in-public-court-18135.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Can't Invoke SC/ST Act If Victim Not Abused in Public: Court | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" -Outlook One cannot be prosecuted for hurling castiest abuses at a person from scheduled caste or tribe unless it is proved that the incident took place in "full public view," a Delhi court has said. Additional Sessions Judge Rajnish Bhatnagar made the..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Can't Invoke SC/ST Act If Victim Not Abused in Public: Court</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <div style="text-align: justify">-Outlook</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">One cannot be prosecuted for hurling castiest abuses at a person from scheduled caste or tribe unless it is proved that the incident took place in "full public view," a Delhi court has said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Additional Sessions Judge Rajnish Bhatnagar made the observation, referring to a provision of the Scheduled Castes and Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and discharging three members of a family of charges under the Act.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"From the bare reading of this section, it is apparent that the alleged abuses must have been given by the accused to the complainant in full 'public view'. In order to bring home the point that this ingredient is not fulfilled even if the allegations are found to be correct though the abuses have not been given in full public view," the court said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It, however, clarified the accused, which included man, his wife and their son, be tried by a magisterial court under the IPC for allegedly hurting the complainant and wrongfully restraining him.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Initially, the accused were also charged for insulting and humiliating a member of scheduled caste member in violation of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"From the statement of complainant, it appears that when the incident took place, the complainant and only accused party were present at the spot and what transpired between them has not been alleged to have taken place within full public view.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"So in these facts and circumstances, it cannot be said that all the ingredients of...The Act are fulfilled in the instant case," the judge said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The FIR had alleged that the father-son duo had accosted the complainant in an inebriated state near their house at Sindhu village here on November 25, 2011 and had beaten him up.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Later, the woman too had joined them and made derogatory caste-based remarks against the complainant, it said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Absolving the accused of charges under the SC/ST Act, the court lent credence to a report of a police officer which said the allegations were "baseless" and "motivated."</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The ASJ, however, said the accused trio would be tried by a magisterial court for offences punishable under sections 323 (voluntarily causing hurt) and 341 (wrongful restrain) of the IPC.</div> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 18006, 'title' => 'Can't Invoke SC/ST Act If Victim Not Abused in Public: Court', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -Outlook </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> One cannot be prosecuted for hurling castiest abuses at a person from scheduled caste or tribe unless it is proved that the incident took place in "full public view," a Delhi court has said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Additional Sessions Judge Rajnish Bhatnagar made the observation, referring to a provision of the Scheduled Castes and Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and discharging three members of a family of charges under the Act. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> "From the bare reading of this section, it is apparent that the alleged abuses must have been given by the accused to the complainant in full 'public view'. In order to bring home the point that this ingredient is not fulfilled even if the allegations are found to be correct though the abuses have not been given in full public view," the court said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> It, however, clarified the accused, which included man, his wife and their son, be tried by a magisterial court under the IPC for allegedly hurting the complainant and wrongfully restraining him. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Initially, the accused were also charged for insulting and humiliating a member of scheduled caste member in violation of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> "From the statement of complainant, it appears that when the incident took place, the complainant and only accused party were present at the spot and what transpired between them has not been alleged to have taken place within full public view. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> "So in these facts and circumstances, it cannot be said that all the ingredients of...The Act are fulfilled in the instant case," the judge said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The FIR had alleged that the father-son duo had accosted the complainant in an inebriated state near their house at Sindhu village here on November 25, 2011 and had beaten him up. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Later, the woman too had joined them and made derogatory caste-based remarks against the complainant, it said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Absolving the accused of charges under the SC/ST Act, the court lent credence to a report of a police officer which said the allegations were "baseless" and "motivated." </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The ASJ, however, said the accused trio would be tried by a magisterial court for offences punishable under sections 323 (voluntarily causing hurt) and 341 (wrongful restrain) of the IPC. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Outlook, 15 November, 2012, http://news.outlookindia.com/items.aspx?artid=780825', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'can039t-invoke-scst-act-if-victim-not-abused-in-public-court-18135', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 18135, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 18006, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Can't Invoke SC/ST Act If Victim Not Abused in Public: Court', 'metaKeywords' => 'caste,Dalits,Law and Justice,Human Rights', 'metaDesc' => ' -Outlook One cannot be prosecuted for hurling castiest abuses at a person from scheduled caste or tribe unless it is proved that the incident took place in "full public view," a Delhi court has said. Additional Sessions Judge Rajnish Bhatnagar made the...', 'disp' => '<div style="text-align: justify">-Outlook</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">One cannot be prosecuted for hurling castiest abuses at a person from scheduled caste or tribe unless it is proved that the incident took place in "full public view," a Delhi court has said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Additional Sessions Judge Rajnish Bhatnagar made the observation, referring to a provision of the Scheduled Castes and Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and discharging three members of a family of charges under the Act.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"From the bare reading of this section, it is apparent that the alleged abuses must have been given by the accused to the complainant in full 'public view'. In order to bring home the point that this ingredient is not fulfilled even if the allegations are found to be correct though the abuses have not been given in full public view," the court said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It, however, clarified the accused, which included man, his wife and their son, be tried by a magisterial court under the IPC for allegedly hurting the complainant and wrongfully restraining him.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Initially, the accused were also charged for insulting and humiliating a member of scheduled caste member in violation of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"From the statement of complainant, it appears that when the incident took place, the complainant and only accused party were present at the spot and what transpired between them has not been alleged to have taken place within full public view.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"So in these facts and circumstances, it cannot be said that all the ingredients of...The Act are fulfilled in the instant case," the judge said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The FIR had alleged that the father-son duo had accosted the complainant in an inebriated state near their house at Sindhu village here on November 25, 2011 and had beaten him up.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Later, the woman too had joined them and made derogatory caste-based remarks against the complainant, it said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Absolving the accused of charges under the SC/ST Act, the court lent credence to a report of a police officer which said the allegations were "baseless" and "motivated."</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The ASJ, however, said the accused trio would be tried by a magisterial court for offences punishable under sections 323 (voluntarily causing hurt) and 341 (wrongful restrain) of the IPC.</div>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 18006, 'title' => 'Can't Invoke SC/ST Act If Victim Not Abused in Public: Court', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<div style="text-align: justify"> -Outlook </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> One cannot be prosecuted for hurling castiest abuses at a person from scheduled caste or tribe unless it is proved that the incident took place in "full public view," a Delhi court has said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Additional Sessions Judge Rajnish Bhatnagar made the observation, referring to a provision of the Scheduled Castes and Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and discharging three members of a family of charges under the Act. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> "From the bare reading of this section, it is apparent that the alleged abuses must have been given by the accused to the complainant in full 'public view'. In order to bring home the point that this ingredient is not fulfilled even if the allegations are found to be correct though the abuses have not been given in full public view," the court said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> It, however, clarified the accused, which included man, his wife and their son, be tried by a magisterial court under the IPC for allegedly hurting the complainant and wrongfully restraining him. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Initially, the accused were also charged for insulting and humiliating a member of scheduled caste member in violation of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> "From the statement of complainant, it appears that when the incident took place, the complainant and only accused party were present at the spot and what transpired between them has not been alleged to have taken place within full public view. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> "So in these facts and circumstances, it cannot be said that all the ingredients of...The Act are fulfilled in the instant case," the judge said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The FIR had alleged that the father-son duo had accosted the complainant in an inebriated state near their house at Sindhu village here on November 25, 2011 and had beaten him up. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Later, the woman too had joined them and made derogatory caste-based remarks against the complainant, it said. </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> Absolving the accused of charges under the SC/ST Act, the court lent credence to a report of a police officer which said the allegations were "baseless" and "motivated." </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> <br /> </div> <div style="text-align: justify"> The ASJ, however, said the accused trio would be tried by a magisterial court for offences punishable under sections 323 (voluntarily causing hurt) and 341 (wrongful restrain) of the IPC. </div>', 'credit_writer' => 'Outlook, 15 November, 2012, http://news.outlookindia.com/items.aspx?artid=780825', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'can039t-invoke-scst-act-if-victim-not-abused-in-public-court-18135', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 18135, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}, (int) 3 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {} ], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 18006 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Can't Invoke SC/ST Act If Victim Not Abused in Public: Court' $metaKeywords = 'caste,Dalits,Law and Justice,Human Rights' $metaDesc = ' -Outlook One cannot be prosecuted for hurling castiest abuses at a person from scheduled caste or tribe unless it is proved that the incident took place in "full public view," a Delhi court has said. Additional Sessions Judge Rajnish Bhatnagar made the...' $disp = '<div style="text-align: justify">-Outlook</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">One cannot be prosecuted for hurling castiest abuses at a person from scheduled caste or tribe unless it is proved that the incident took place in "full public view," a Delhi court has said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Additional Sessions Judge Rajnish Bhatnagar made the observation, referring to a provision of the Scheduled Castes and Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and discharging three members of a family of charges under the Act.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"From the bare reading of this section, it is apparent that the alleged abuses must have been given by the accused to the complainant in full 'public view'. In order to bring home the point that this ingredient is not fulfilled even if the allegations are found to be correct though the abuses have not been given in full public view," the court said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">It, however, clarified the accused, which included man, his wife and their son, be tried by a magisterial court under the IPC for allegedly hurting the complainant and wrongfully restraining him.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Initially, the accused were also charged for insulting and humiliating a member of scheduled caste member in violation of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"From the statement of complainant, it appears that when the incident took place, the complainant and only accused party were present at the spot and what transpired between them has not been alleged to have taken place within full public view.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">"So in these facts and circumstances, it cannot be said that all the ingredients of...The Act are fulfilled in the instant case," the judge said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The FIR had alleged that the father-son duo had accosted the complainant in an inebriated state near their house at Sindhu village here on November 25, 2011 and had beaten him up.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Later, the woman too had joined them and made derogatory caste-based remarks against the complainant, it said.</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">Absolving the accused of charges under the SC/ST Act, the court lent credence to a report of a police officer which said the allegations were "baseless" and "motivated."</div><div style="text-align: justify"><br /></div><div style="text-align: justify">The ASJ, however, said the accused trio would be tried by a magisterial court for offences punishable under sections 323 (voluntarily causing hurt) and 341 (wrongful restrain) of the IPC.</div>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Can't Invoke SC/ST Act If Victim Not Abused in Public: Court |
-Outlook One cannot be prosecuted for hurling castiest abuses at a person from scheduled caste or tribe unless it is proved that the incident took place in "full public view," a Delhi court has said. Additional Sessions Judge Rajnish Bhatnagar made the observation, referring to a provision of the Scheduled Castes and Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and discharging three members of a family of charges under the Act. "From the bare reading of this section, it is apparent that the alleged abuses must have been given by the accused to the complainant in full 'public view'. In order to bring home the point that this ingredient is not fulfilled even if the allegations are found to be correct though the abuses have not been given in full public view," the court said. It, however, clarified the accused, which included man, his wife and their son, be tried by a magisterial court under the IPC for allegedly hurting the complainant and wrongfully restraining him. Initially, the accused were also charged for insulting and humiliating a member of scheduled caste member in violation of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. "From the statement of complainant, it appears that when the incident took place, the complainant and only accused party were present at the spot and what transpired between them has not been alleged to have taken place within full public view. "So in these facts and circumstances, it cannot be said that all the ingredients of...The Act are fulfilled in the instant case," the judge said. The FIR had alleged that the father-son duo had accosted the complainant in an inebriated state near their house at Sindhu village here on November 25, 2011 and had beaten him up. Later, the woman too had joined them and made derogatory caste-based remarks against the complainant, it said. Absolving the accused of charges under the SC/ST Act, the court lent credence to a report of a police officer which said the allegations were "baseless" and "motivated." The ASJ, however, said the accused trio would be tried by a magisterial court for offences punishable under sections 323 (voluntarily causing hurt) and 341 (wrongful restrain) of the IPC.
|