Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/can039t-punish-people-for-not-using-public-transport-hc-abhinav-garg-17280/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/can039t-punish-people-for-not-using-public-transport-hc-abhinav-garg-17280/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/can039t-punish-people-for-not-using-public-transport-hc-abhinav-garg-17280/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/can039t-punish-people-for-not-using-public-transport-hc-abhinav-garg-17280/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680549e9eab50-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680549e9eab50-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680549e9eab50-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680549e9eab50-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680549e9eab50-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680549e9eab50-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680549e9eab50-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680549e9eab50-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680549e9eab50-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 17152,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Can&amp;#039;t punish people for not using public transport: HC -Abhinav Garg&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;Car users can&#039;t be penalized for not switching to public transport system, Delhi high court observed on Monday while analyzing the effectiveness of the BRT corridor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The policy shouldn&#039;t be such that you will be punished for doing something... that&#039;s not the way to encourage people to use public transport and discourage use of private vehicles,&amp;quot; a division bench comprising Justice Pradeep Nandrajog and Justice Manmohan Singh remarked while wrapping up a marathon hearing on a PIL that challenges the BRT corridor. HC reserved its orders on the PIL seeking to scrap 5.8km-long Ambedkar Nagar-Moolchand BRT, even as it dismissed a plea by NGO Nyay Bhoomi seeking contempt proceedings against the government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court was responding to an argument by Prashant Bhushan, who appeared for an organization that favours the BRT. Bhushan made light of the delays faced by car users on the BRT stretch, saying &amp;quot;unless they (car users) are punished, they will not shift to public transport system&amp;quot;. He also claimed that Central Road Research Institute (CRRI) was not the right body to study the corridor, and HC should instead rope in Unified Traffic and Transportation Infrastructure Planning &amp;amp; Engineering Centre ( UTTIPEC) to assist it in forming a view.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But HC acknowledged that the slow-moving traffic on BRT created problems for car users and others who do not opt for buses, and argued they cannot be punished to shift to public transport. During the four-hour-long hearing, HC heard a cross-section of views from the government, Nyay Bhoomi, CRRI and Bhushan.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It also frowned upon the absence of senior advocate K T S Tulsi, appearing for the Delhi government, as it wanted to know if the government was conscious of the traffic problems that might crop up at other places earmarked for extension of the BRT project. &amp;quot;Arrangements have to be made in advance to solve the problem,&amp;quot; the court said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Earlier, B B Sharan, speaking for Nyaya Bhoomi, had referred to the survey report of CRRI on BRT here and sought its scrapping on the ground that it was harassing commuters and was a waste of public money. Sharan also referred to the master plan to drive home the point that a dedicated BRT corridor cannot be implemented on narrow roads as it would hardly leave any space for other vehicles. The bench asked Sharan to cite case laws to establish that the PIL was maintainable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The decision is a policy decision of the executive and how can it be the subject matter of the PIL?&amp;quot; the bench wanted to know. &amp;quot;Right to equality (in using road space) has been infringed by denying car, other vehicle users the requisite road space. Forty-five per cent road space has been eaten away by BRT alone,&amp;quot; Sharan replied. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 25 September, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/delhi/Cant-punish-people-for-not-using-public-transport-HC/articleshow/16536265.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;can039t-punish-people-for-not-using-public-transport-hc-abhinav-garg-17280&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 17280,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 17152,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Can&amp;#039;t punish people for not using public transport: HC -Abhinav Garg&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Transport&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Times of India

NEW DELHI: Car users can&#039;t be penalized for not switching to public transport system, Delhi high court observed on Monday while analyzing the effectiveness of the BRT corridor.

&amp;quot;The policy shouldn&#039;t be such that you will be punished...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;Car users can&#039;t be penalized for not switching to public transport system, Delhi high court observed on Monday while analyzing the effectiveness of the BRT corridor.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;The policy shouldn&#039;t be such that you will be punished for doing something... that&#039;s not the way to encourage people to use public transport and discourage use of private vehicles,&amp;quot; a division bench comprising Justice Pradeep Nandrajog and Justice Manmohan Singh remarked while wrapping up a marathon hearing on a PIL that challenges the BRT corridor. HC reserved its orders on the PIL seeking to scrap 5.8km-long Ambedkar Nagar-Moolchand BRT, even as it dismissed a plea by NGO Nyay Bhoomi seeking contempt proceedings against the government.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court was responding to an argument by Prashant Bhushan, who appeared for an organization that favours the BRT. Bhushan made light of the delays faced by car users on the BRT stretch, saying &amp;quot;unless they (car users) are punished, they will not shift to public transport system&amp;quot;. He also claimed that Central Road Research Institute (CRRI) was not the right body to study the corridor, and HC should instead rope in Unified Traffic and Transportation Infrastructure Planning &amp;amp; Engineering Centre ( UTTIPEC) to assist it in forming a view.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But HC acknowledged that the slow-moving traffic on BRT created problems for car users and others who do not opt for buses, and argued they cannot be punished to shift to public transport. During the four-hour-long hearing, HC heard a cross-section of views from the government, Nyay Bhoomi, CRRI and Bhushan.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It also frowned upon the absence of senior advocate K T S Tulsi, appearing for the Delhi government, as it wanted to know if the government was conscious of the traffic problems that might crop up at other places earmarked for extension of the BRT project. &amp;quot;Arrangements have to be made in advance to solve the problem,&amp;quot; the court said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Earlier, B B Sharan, speaking for Nyaya Bhoomi, had referred to the survey report of CRRI on BRT here and sought its scrapping on the ground that it was harassing commuters and was a waste of public money. Sharan also referred to the master plan to drive home the point that a dedicated BRT corridor cannot be implemented on narrow roads as it would hardly leave any space for other vehicles. The bench asked Sharan to cite case laws to establish that the PIL was maintainable.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;The decision is a policy decision of the executive and how can it be the subject matter of the PIL?&amp;quot; the bench wanted to know. &amp;quot;Right to equality (in using road space) has been infringed by denying car, other vehicle users the requisite road space. Forty-five per cent road space has been eaten away by BRT alone,&amp;quot; Sharan replied. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 17152,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Can&amp;#039;t punish people for not using public transport: HC -Abhinav Garg&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;Car users can&#039;t be penalized for not switching to public transport system, Delhi high court observed on Monday while analyzing the effectiveness of the BRT corridor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The policy shouldn&#039;t be such that you will be punished for doing something... that&#039;s not the way to encourage people to use public transport and discourage use of private vehicles,&amp;quot; a division bench comprising Justice Pradeep Nandrajog and Justice Manmohan Singh remarked while wrapping up a marathon hearing on a PIL that challenges the BRT corridor. HC reserved its orders on the PIL seeking to scrap 5.8km-long Ambedkar Nagar-Moolchand BRT, even as it dismissed a plea by NGO Nyay Bhoomi seeking contempt proceedings against the government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court was responding to an argument by Prashant Bhushan, who appeared for an organization that favours the BRT. Bhushan made light of the delays faced by car users on the BRT stretch, saying &amp;quot;unless they (car users) are punished, they will not shift to public transport system&amp;quot;. He also claimed that Central Road Research Institute (CRRI) was not the right body to study the corridor, and HC should instead rope in Unified Traffic and Transportation Infrastructure Planning &amp;amp; Engineering Centre ( UTTIPEC) to assist it in forming a view.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But HC acknowledged that the slow-moving traffic on BRT created problems for car users and others who do not opt for buses, and argued they cannot be punished to shift to public transport. During the four-hour-long hearing, HC heard a cross-section of views from the government, Nyay Bhoomi, CRRI and Bhushan.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It also frowned upon the absence of senior advocate K T S Tulsi, appearing for the Delhi government, as it wanted to know if the government was conscious of the traffic problems that might crop up at other places earmarked for extension of the BRT project. &amp;quot;Arrangements have to be made in advance to solve the problem,&amp;quot; the court said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Earlier, B B Sharan, speaking for Nyaya Bhoomi, had referred to the survey report of CRRI on BRT here and sought its scrapping on the ground that it was harassing commuters and was a waste of public money. Sharan also referred to the master plan to drive home the point that a dedicated BRT corridor cannot be implemented on narrow roads as it would hardly leave any space for other vehicles. The bench asked Sharan to cite case laws to establish that the PIL was maintainable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The decision is a policy decision of the executive and how can it be the subject matter of the PIL?&amp;quot; the bench wanted to know. &amp;quot;Right to equality (in using road space) has been infringed by denying car, other vehicle users the requisite road space. Forty-five per cent road space has been eaten away by BRT alone,&amp;quot; Sharan replied. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 25 September, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/delhi/Cant-punish-people-for-not-using-public-transport-HC/articleshow/16536265.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;can039t-punish-people-for-not-using-public-transport-hc-abhinav-garg-17280&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 17280,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 17152
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Can&amp;#039;t punish people for not using public transport: HC -Abhinav Garg&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Transport&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Times of India

NEW DELHI: Car users can&#039;t be penalized for not switching to public transport system, Delhi high court observed on Monday while analyzing the effectiveness of the BRT corridor.

&amp;quot;The policy shouldn&#039;t be such that you will be punished...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;Car users can&#039;t be penalized for not switching to public transport system, Delhi high court observed on Monday while analyzing the effectiveness of the BRT corridor.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;The policy shouldn&#039;t be such that you will be punished for doing something... that&#039;s not the way to encourage people to use public transport and discourage use of private vehicles,&amp;quot; a division bench comprising Justice Pradeep Nandrajog and Justice Manmohan Singh remarked while wrapping up a marathon hearing on a PIL that challenges the BRT corridor. HC reserved its orders on the PIL seeking to scrap 5.8km-long Ambedkar Nagar-Moolchand BRT, even as it dismissed a plea by NGO Nyay Bhoomi seeking contempt proceedings against the government.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court was responding to an argument by Prashant Bhushan, who appeared for an organization that favours the BRT. Bhushan made light of the delays faced by car users on the BRT stretch, saying &amp;quot;unless they (car users) are punished, they will not shift to public transport system&amp;quot;. He also claimed that Central Road Research Institute (CRRI) was not the right body to study the corridor, and HC should instead rope in Unified Traffic and Transportation Infrastructure Planning &amp;amp; Engineering Centre ( UTTIPEC) to assist it in forming a view.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But HC acknowledged that the slow-moving traffic on BRT created problems for car users and others who do not opt for buses, and argued they cannot be punished to shift to public transport. During the four-hour-long hearing, HC heard a cross-section of views from the government, Nyay Bhoomi, CRRI and Bhushan.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It also frowned upon the absence of senior advocate K T S Tulsi, appearing for the Delhi government, as it wanted to know if the government was conscious of the traffic problems that might crop up at other places earmarked for extension of the BRT project. &amp;quot;Arrangements have to be made in advance to solve the problem,&amp;quot; the court said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Earlier, B B Sharan, speaking for Nyaya Bhoomi, had referred to the survey report of CRRI on BRT here and sought its scrapping on the ground that it was harassing commuters and was a waste of public money. Sharan also referred to the master plan to drive home the point that a dedicated BRT corridor cannot be implemented on narrow roads as it would hardly leave any space for other vehicles. The bench asked Sharan to cite case laws to establish that the PIL was maintainable.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;The decision is a policy decision of the executive and how can it be the subject matter of the PIL?&amp;quot; the bench wanted to know. &amp;quot;Right to equality (in using road space) has been infringed by denying car, other vehicle users the requisite road space. Forty-five per cent road space has been eaten away by BRT alone,&amp;quot; Sharan replied. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/can039t-punish-people-for-not-using-public-transport-hc-abhinav-garg-17280.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Can&#039;t punish people for not using public transport: HC -Abhinav Garg | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Times of India

NEW DELHI: Car users can't be penalized for not switching to public transport system, Delhi high court observed on Monday while analyzing the effectiveness of the BRT corridor.

&quot;The policy shouldn't be such that you will be punished..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Can&#039;t punish people for not using public transport: HC -Abhinav Garg</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Times of India<br /><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>Car users can't be penalized for not switching to public transport system, Delhi high court observed on Monday while analyzing the effectiveness of the BRT corridor.<br /><br />&quot;The policy shouldn't be such that you will be punished for doing something... that's not the way to encourage people to use public transport and discourage use of private vehicles,&quot; a division bench comprising Justice Pradeep Nandrajog and Justice Manmohan Singh remarked while wrapping up a marathon hearing on a PIL that challenges the BRT corridor. HC reserved its orders on the PIL seeking to scrap 5.8km-long Ambedkar Nagar-Moolchand BRT, even as it dismissed a plea by NGO Nyay Bhoomi seeking contempt proceedings against the government.<br /><br />The court was responding to an argument by Prashant Bhushan, who appeared for an organization that favours the BRT. Bhushan made light of the delays faced by car users on the BRT stretch, saying &quot;unless they (car users) are punished, they will not shift to public transport system&quot;. He also claimed that Central Road Research Institute (CRRI) was not the right body to study the corridor, and HC should instead rope in Unified Traffic and Transportation Infrastructure Planning &amp; Engineering Centre ( UTTIPEC) to assist it in forming a view.<br /><br />But HC acknowledged that the slow-moving traffic on BRT created problems for car users and others who do not opt for buses, and argued they cannot be punished to shift to public transport. During the four-hour-long hearing, HC heard a cross-section of views from the government, Nyay Bhoomi, CRRI and Bhushan.<br /><br />It also frowned upon the absence of senior advocate K T S Tulsi, appearing for the Delhi government, as it wanted to know if the government was conscious of the traffic problems that might crop up at other places earmarked for extension of the BRT project. &quot;Arrangements have to be made in advance to solve the problem,&quot; the court said.<br /><br />Earlier, B B Sharan, speaking for Nyaya Bhoomi, had referred to the survey report of CRRI on BRT here and sought its scrapping on the ground that it was harassing commuters and was a waste of public money. Sharan also referred to the master plan to drive home the point that a dedicated BRT corridor cannot be implemented on narrow roads as it would hardly leave any space for other vehicles. The bench asked Sharan to cite case laws to establish that the PIL was maintainable.<br /><br />&quot;The decision is a policy decision of the executive and how can it be the subject matter of the PIL?&quot; the bench wanted to know. &quot;Right to equality (in using road space) has been infringed by denying car, other vehicle users the requisite road space. Forty-five per cent road space has been eaten away by BRT alone,&quot; Sharan replied. <br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680549e9eab50-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680549e9eab50-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680549e9eab50-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680549e9eab50-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680549e9eab50-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680549e9eab50-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680549e9eab50-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680549e9eab50-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680549e9eab50-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 17152,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Can&amp;#039;t punish people for not using public transport: HC -Abhinav Garg&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;Car users can&#039;t be penalized for not switching to public transport system, Delhi high court observed on Monday while analyzing the effectiveness of the BRT corridor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The policy shouldn&#039;t be such that you will be punished for doing something... that&#039;s not the way to encourage people to use public transport and discourage use of private vehicles,&amp;quot; a division bench comprising Justice Pradeep Nandrajog and Justice Manmohan Singh remarked while wrapping up a marathon hearing on a PIL that challenges the BRT corridor. HC reserved its orders on the PIL seeking to scrap 5.8km-long Ambedkar Nagar-Moolchand BRT, even as it dismissed a plea by NGO Nyay Bhoomi seeking contempt proceedings against the government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court was responding to an argument by Prashant Bhushan, who appeared for an organization that favours the BRT. Bhushan made light of the delays faced by car users on the BRT stretch, saying &amp;quot;unless they (car users) are punished, they will not shift to public transport system&amp;quot;. He also claimed that Central Road Research Institute (CRRI) was not the right body to study the corridor, and HC should instead rope in Unified Traffic and Transportation Infrastructure Planning &amp;amp; Engineering Centre ( UTTIPEC) to assist it in forming a view.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But HC acknowledged that the slow-moving traffic on BRT created problems for car users and others who do not opt for buses, and argued they cannot be punished to shift to public transport. During the four-hour-long hearing, HC heard a cross-section of views from the government, Nyay Bhoomi, CRRI and Bhushan.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It also frowned upon the absence of senior advocate K T S Tulsi, appearing for the Delhi government, as it wanted to know if the government was conscious of the traffic problems that might crop up at other places earmarked for extension of the BRT project. &amp;quot;Arrangements have to be made in advance to solve the problem,&amp;quot; the court said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Earlier, B B Sharan, speaking for Nyaya Bhoomi, had referred to the survey report of CRRI on BRT here and sought its scrapping on the ground that it was harassing commuters and was a waste of public money. Sharan also referred to the master plan to drive home the point that a dedicated BRT corridor cannot be implemented on narrow roads as it would hardly leave any space for other vehicles. The bench asked Sharan to cite case laws to establish that the PIL was maintainable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The decision is a policy decision of the executive and how can it be the subject matter of the PIL?&amp;quot; the bench wanted to know. &amp;quot;Right to equality (in using road space) has been infringed by denying car, other vehicle users the requisite road space. Forty-five per cent road space has been eaten away by BRT alone,&amp;quot; Sharan replied. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 25 September, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/delhi/Cant-punish-people-for-not-using-public-transport-HC/articleshow/16536265.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;can039t-punish-people-for-not-using-public-transport-hc-abhinav-garg-17280&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 17280,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 17152,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Can&amp;#039;t punish people for not using public transport: HC -Abhinav Garg&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Transport&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Times of India

NEW DELHI: Car users can&#039;t be penalized for not switching to public transport system, Delhi high court observed on Monday while analyzing the effectiveness of the BRT corridor.

&amp;quot;The policy shouldn&#039;t be such that you will be punished...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;Car users can&#039;t be penalized for not switching to public transport system, Delhi high court observed on Monday while analyzing the effectiveness of the BRT corridor.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;The policy shouldn&#039;t be such that you will be punished for doing something... that&#039;s not the way to encourage people to use public transport and discourage use of private vehicles,&amp;quot; a division bench comprising Justice Pradeep Nandrajog and Justice Manmohan Singh remarked while wrapping up a marathon hearing on a PIL that challenges the BRT corridor. HC reserved its orders on the PIL seeking to scrap 5.8km-long Ambedkar Nagar-Moolchand BRT, even as it dismissed a plea by NGO Nyay Bhoomi seeking contempt proceedings against the government.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court was responding to an argument by Prashant Bhushan, who appeared for an organization that favours the BRT. Bhushan made light of the delays faced by car users on the BRT stretch, saying &amp;quot;unless they (car users) are punished, they will not shift to public transport system&amp;quot;. He also claimed that Central Road Research Institute (CRRI) was not the right body to study the corridor, and HC should instead rope in Unified Traffic and Transportation Infrastructure Planning &amp;amp; Engineering Centre ( UTTIPEC) to assist it in forming a view.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But HC acknowledged that the slow-moving traffic on BRT created problems for car users and others who do not opt for buses, and argued they cannot be punished to shift to public transport. During the four-hour-long hearing, HC heard a cross-section of views from the government, Nyay Bhoomi, CRRI and Bhushan.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It also frowned upon the absence of senior advocate K T S Tulsi, appearing for the Delhi government, as it wanted to know if the government was conscious of the traffic problems that might crop up at other places earmarked for extension of the BRT project. &amp;quot;Arrangements have to be made in advance to solve the problem,&amp;quot; the court said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Earlier, B B Sharan, speaking for Nyaya Bhoomi, had referred to the survey report of CRRI on BRT here and sought its scrapping on the ground that it was harassing commuters and was a waste of public money. Sharan also referred to the master plan to drive home the point that a dedicated BRT corridor cannot be implemented on narrow roads as it would hardly leave any space for other vehicles. The bench asked Sharan to cite case laws to establish that the PIL was maintainable.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;The decision is a policy decision of the executive and how can it be the subject matter of the PIL?&amp;quot; the bench wanted to know. &amp;quot;Right to equality (in using road space) has been infringed by denying car, other vehicle users the requisite road space. Forty-five per cent road space has been eaten away by BRT alone,&amp;quot; Sharan replied. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 17152,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Can&amp;#039;t punish people for not using public transport: HC -Abhinav Garg&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;Car users can&#039;t be penalized for not switching to public transport system, Delhi high court observed on Monday while analyzing the effectiveness of the BRT corridor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The policy shouldn&#039;t be such that you will be punished for doing something... that&#039;s not the way to encourage people to use public transport and discourage use of private vehicles,&amp;quot; a division bench comprising Justice Pradeep Nandrajog and Justice Manmohan Singh remarked while wrapping up a marathon hearing on a PIL that challenges the BRT corridor. HC reserved its orders on the PIL seeking to scrap 5.8km-long Ambedkar Nagar-Moolchand BRT, even as it dismissed a plea by NGO Nyay Bhoomi seeking contempt proceedings against the government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court was responding to an argument by Prashant Bhushan, who appeared for an organization that favours the BRT. Bhushan made light of the delays faced by car users on the BRT stretch, saying &amp;quot;unless they (car users) are punished, they will not shift to public transport system&amp;quot;. He also claimed that Central Road Research Institute (CRRI) was not the right body to study the corridor, and HC should instead rope in Unified Traffic and Transportation Infrastructure Planning &amp;amp; Engineering Centre ( UTTIPEC) to assist it in forming a view.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But HC acknowledged that the slow-moving traffic on BRT created problems for car users and others who do not opt for buses, and argued they cannot be punished to shift to public transport. During the four-hour-long hearing, HC heard a cross-section of views from the government, Nyay Bhoomi, CRRI and Bhushan.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It also frowned upon the absence of senior advocate K T S Tulsi, appearing for the Delhi government, as it wanted to know if the government was conscious of the traffic problems that might crop up at other places earmarked for extension of the BRT project. &amp;quot;Arrangements have to be made in advance to solve the problem,&amp;quot; the court said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Earlier, B B Sharan, speaking for Nyaya Bhoomi, had referred to the survey report of CRRI on BRT here and sought its scrapping on the ground that it was harassing commuters and was a waste of public money. Sharan also referred to the master plan to drive home the point that a dedicated BRT corridor cannot be implemented on narrow roads as it would hardly leave any space for other vehicles. The bench asked Sharan to cite case laws to establish that the PIL was maintainable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The decision is a policy decision of the executive and how can it be the subject matter of the PIL?&amp;quot; the bench wanted to know. &amp;quot;Right to equality (in using road space) has been infringed by denying car, other vehicle users the requisite road space. Forty-five per cent road space has been eaten away by BRT alone,&amp;quot; Sharan replied. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 25 September, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/delhi/Cant-punish-people-for-not-using-public-transport-HC/articleshow/16536265.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;can039t-punish-people-for-not-using-public-transport-hc-abhinav-garg-17280&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 17280,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 17152
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Can&amp;#039;t punish people for not using public transport: HC -Abhinav Garg&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Transport&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Times of India

NEW DELHI: Car users can&#039;t be penalized for not switching to public transport system, Delhi high court observed on Monday while analyzing the effectiveness of the BRT corridor.

&amp;quot;The policy shouldn&#039;t be such that you will be punished...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;Car users can&#039;t be penalized for not switching to public transport system, Delhi high court observed on Monday while analyzing the effectiveness of the BRT corridor.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;The policy shouldn&#039;t be such that you will be punished for doing something... that&#039;s not the way to encourage people to use public transport and discourage use of private vehicles,&amp;quot; a division bench comprising Justice Pradeep Nandrajog and Justice Manmohan Singh remarked while wrapping up a marathon hearing on a PIL that challenges the BRT corridor. HC reserved its orders on the PIL seeking to scrap 5.8km-long Ambedkar Nagar-Moolchand BRT, even as it dismissed a plea by NGO Nyay Bhoomi seeking contempt proceedings against the government.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court was responding to an argument by Prashant Bhushan, who appeared for an organization that favours the BRT. Bhushan made light of the delays faced by car users on the BRT stretch, saying &amp;quot;unless they (car users) are punished, they will not shift to public transport system&amp;quot;. He also claimed that Central Road Research Institute (CRRI) was not the right body to study the corridor, and HC should instead rope in Unified Traffic and Transportation Infrastructure Planning &amp;amp; Engineering Centre ( UTTIPEC) to assist it in forming a view.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But HC acknowledged that the slow-moving traffic on BRT created problems for car users and others who do not opt for buses, and argued they cannot be punished to shift to public transport. During the four-hour-long hearing, HC heard a cross-section of views from the government, Nyay Bhoomi, CRRI and Bhushan.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It also frowned upon the absence of senior advocate K T S Tulsi, appearing for the Delhi government, as it wanted to know if the government was conscious of the traffic problems that might crop up at other places earmarked for extension of the BRT project. &amp;quot;Arrangements have to be made in advance to solve the problem,&amp;quot; the court said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Earlier, B B Sharan, speaking for Nyaya Bhoomi, had referred to the survey report of CRRI on BRT here and sought its scrapping on the ground that it was harassing commuters and was a waste of public money. Sharan also referred to the master plan to drive home the point that a dedicated BRT corridor cannot be implemented on narrow roads as it would hardly leave any space for other vehicles. The bench asked Sharan to cite case laws to establish that the PIL was maintainable.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;The decision is a policy decision of the executive and how can it be the subject matter of the PIL?&amp;quot; the bench wanted to know. &amp;quot;Right to equality (in using road space) has been infringed by denying car, other vehicle users the requisite road space. Forty-five per cent road space has been eaten away by BRT alone,&amp;quot; Sharan replied. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/can039t-punish-people-for-not-using-public-transport-hc-abhinav-garg-17280.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Can&#039;t punish people for not using public transport: HC -Abhinav Garg | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Times of India

NEW DELHI: Car users can't be penalized for not switching to public transport system, Delhi high court observed on Monday while analyzing the effectiveness of the BRT corridor.

&quot;The policy shouldn't be such that you will be punished..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Can&#039;t punish people for not using public transport: HC -Abhinav Garg</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Times of India<br /><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>Car users can't be penalized for not switching to public transport system, Delhi high court observed on Monday while analyzing the effectiveness of the BRT corridor.<br /><br />&quot;The policy shouldn't be such that you will be punished for doing something... that's not the way to encourage people to use public transport and discourage use of private vehicles,&quot; a division bench comprising Justice Pradeep Nandrajog and Justice Manmohan Singh remarked while wrapping up a marathon hearing on a PIL that challenges the BRT corridor. HC reserved its orders on the PIL seeking to scrap 5.8km-long Ambedkar Nagar-Moolchand BRT, even as it dismissed a plea by NGO Nyay Bhoomi seeking contempt proceedings against the government.<br /><br />The court was responding to an argument by Prashant Bhushan, who appeared for an organization that favours the BRT. Bhushan made light of the delays faced by car users on the BRT stretch, saying &quot;unless they (car users) are punished, they will not shift to public transport system&quot;. He also claimed that Central Road Research Institute (CRRI) was not the right body to study the corridor, and HC should instead rope in Unified Traffic and Transportation Infrastructure Planning &amp; Engineering Centre ( UTTIPEC) to assist it in forming a view.<br /><br />But HC acknowledged that the slow-moving traffic on BRT created problems for car users and others who do not opt for buses, and argued they cannot be punished to shift to public transport. During the four-hour-long hearing, HC heard a cross-section of views from the government, Nyay Bhoomi, CRRI and Bhushan.<br /><br />It also frowned upon the absence of senior advocate K T S Tulsi, appearing for the Delhi government, as it wanted to know if the government was conscious of the traffic problems that might crop up at other places earmarked for extension of the BRT project. &quot;Arrangements have to be made in advance to solve the problem,&quot; the court said.<br /><br />Earlier, B B Sharan, speaking for Nyaya Bhoomi, had referred to the survey report of CRRI on BRT here and sought its scrapping on the ground that it was harassing commuters and was a waste of public money. Sharan also referred to the master plan to drive home the point that a dedicated BRT corridor cannot be implemented on narrow roads as it would hardly leave any space for other vehicles. The bench asked Sharan to cite case laws to establish that the PIL was maintainable.<br /><br />&quot;The decision is a policy decision of the executive and how can it be the subject matter of the PIL?&quot; the bench wanted to know. &quot;Right to equality (in using road space) has been infringed by denying car, other vehicle users the requisite road space. Forty-five per cent road space has been eaten away by BRT alone,&quot; Sharan replied. <br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680549e9eab50-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680549e9eab50-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr680549e9eab50-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680549e9eab50-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680549e9eab50-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr680549e9eab50-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr680549e9eab50-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr680549e9eab50-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr680549e9eab50-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 17152,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Can&amp;#039;t punish people for not using public transport: HC -Abhinav Garg&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;Car users can&#039;t be penalized for not switching to public transport system, Delhi high court observed on Monday while analyzing the effectiveness of the BRT corridor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The policy shouldn&#039;t be such that you will be punished for doing something... that&#039;s not the way to encourage people to use public transport and discourage use of private vehicles,&amp;quot; a division bench comprising Justice Pradeep Nandrajog and Justice Manmohan Singh remarked while wrapping up a marathon hearing on a PIL that challenges the BRT corridor. HC reserved its orders on the PIL seeking to scrap 5.8km-long Ambedkar Nagar-Moolchand BRT, even as it dismissed a plea by NGO Nyay Bhoomi seeking contempt proceedings against the government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court was responding to an argument by Prashant Bhushan, who appeared for an organization that favours the BRT. Bhushan made light of the delays faced by car users on the BRT stretch, saying &amp;quot;unless they (car users) are punished, they will not shift to public transport system&amp;quot;. He also claimed that Central Road Research Institute (CRRI) was not the right body to study the corridor, and HC should instead rope in Unified Traffic and Transportation Infrastructure Planning &amp;amp; Engineering Centre ( UTTIPEC) to assist it in forming a view.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But HC acknowledged that the slow-moving traffic on BRT created problems for car users and others who do not opt for buses, and argued they cannot be punished to shift to public transport. During the four-hour-long hearing, HC heard a cross-section of views from the government, Nyay Bhoomi, CRRI and Bhushan.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It also frowned upon the absence of senior advocate K T S Tulsi, appearing for the Delhi government, as it wanted to know if the government was conscious of the traffic problems that might crop up at other places earmarked for extension of the BRT project. &amp;quot;Arrangements have to be made in advance to solve the problem,&amp;quot; the court said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Earlier, B B Sharan, speaking for Nyaya Bhoomi, had referred to the survey report of CRRI on BRT here and sought its scrapping on the ground that it was harassing commuters and was a waste of public money. Sharan also referred to the master plan to drive home the point that a dedicated BRT corridor cannot be implemented on narrow roads as it would hardly leave any space for other vehicles. The bench asked Sharan to cite case laws to establish that the PIL was maintainable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The decision is a policy decision of the executive and how can it be the subject matter of the PIL?&amp;quot; the bench wanted to know. &amp;quot;Right to equality (in using road space) has been infringed by denying car, other vehicle users the requisite road space. Forty-five per cent road space has been eaten away by BRT alone,&amp;quot; Sharan replied. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 25 September, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/delhi/Cant-punish-people-for-not-using-public-transport-HC/articleshow/16536265.cms&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;can039t-punish-people-for-not-using-public-transport-hc-abhinav-garg-17280&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 17280,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 17152,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Can&amp;#039;t punish people for not using public transport: HC -Abhinav Garg&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Transport&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Times of India

NEW DELHI: Car users can&#039;t be penalized for not switching to public transport system, Delhi high court observed on Monday while analyzing the effectiveness of the BRT corridor.

&amp;quot;The policy shouldn&#039;t be such that you will be punished...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;Car users can&#039;t be penalized for not switching to public transport system, Delhi high court observed on Monday while analyzing the effectiveness of the BRT corridor.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;The policy shouldn&#039;t be such that you will be punished for doing something... that&#039;s not the way to encourage people to use public transport and discourage use of private vehicles,&amp;quot; a division bench comprising Justice Pradeep Nandrajog and Justice Manmohan Singh remarked while wrapping up a marathon hearing on a PIL that challenges the BRT corridor. HC reserved its orders on the PIL seeking to scrap 5.8km-long Ambedkar Nagar-Moolchand BRT, even as it dismissed a plea by NGO Nyay Bhoomi seeking contempt proceedings against the government.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court was responding to an argument by Prashant Bhushan, who appeared for an organization that favours the BRT. Bhushan made light of the delays faced by car users on the BRT stretch, saying &amp;quot;unless they (car users) are punished, they will not shift to public transport system&amp;quot;. He also claimed that Central Road Research Institute (CRRI) was not the right body to study the corridor, and HC should instead rope in Unified Traffic and Transportation Infrastructure Planning &amp;amp; Engineering Centre ( UTTIPEC) to assist it in forming a view.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But HC acknowledged that the slow-moving traffic on BRT created problems for car users and others who do not opt for buses, and argued they cannot be punished to shift to public transport. During the four-hour-long hearing, HC heard a cross-section of views from the government, Nyay Bhoomi, CRRI and Bhushan.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It also frowned upon the absence of senior advocate K T S Tulsi, appearing for the Delhi government, as it wanted to know if the government was conscious of the traffic problems that might crop up at other places earmarked for extension of the BRT project. &amp;quot;Arrangements have to be made in advance to solve the problem,&amp;quot; the court said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Earlier, B B Sharan, speaking for Nyaya Bhoomi, had referred to the survey report of CRRI on BRT here and sought its scrapping on the ground that it was harassing commuters and was a waste of public money. Sharan also referred to the master plan to drive home the point that a dedicated BRT corridor cannot be implemented on narrow roads as it would hardly leave any space for other vehicles. The bench asked Sharan to cite case laws to establish that the PIL was maintainable.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;The decision is a policy decision of the executive and how can it be the subject matter of the PIL?&amp;quot; the bench wanted to know. &amp;quot;Right to equality (in using road space) has been infringed by denying car, other vehicle users the requisite road space. Forty-five per cent road space has been eaten away by BRT alone,&amp;quot; Sharan replied. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 17152,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Can&amp;#039;t punish people for not using public transport: HC -Abhinav Garg&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;Car users can&#039;t be penalized for not switching to public transport system, Delhi high court observed on Monday while analyzing the effectiveness of the BRT corridor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The policy shouldn&#039;t be such that you will be punished for doing something... that&#039;s not the way to encourage people to use public transport and discourage use of private vehicles,&amp;quot; a division bench comprising Justice Pradeep Nandrajog and Justice Manmohan Singh remarked while wrapping up a marathon hearing on a PIL that challenges the BRT corridor. HC reserved its orders on the PIL seeking to scrap 5.8km-long Ambedkar Nagar-Moolchand BRT, even as it dismissed a plea by NGO Nyay Bhoomi seeking contempt proceedings against the government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The court was responding to an argument by Prashant Bhushan, who appeared for an organization that favours the BRT. Bhushan made light of the delays faced by car users on the BRT stretch, saying &amp;quot;unless they (car users) are punished, they will not shift to public transport system&amp;quot;. He also claimed that Central Road Research Institute (CRRI) was not the right body to study the corridor, and HC should instead rope in Unified Traffic and Transportation Infrastructure Planning &amp;amp; Engineering Centre ( UTTIPEC) to assist it in forming a view.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But HC acknowledged that the slow-moving traffic on BRT created problems for car users and others who do not opt for buses, and argued they cannot be punished to shift to public transport. During the four-hour-long hearing, HC heard a cross-section of views from the government, Nyay Bhoomi, CRRI and Bhushan.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It also frowned upon the absence of senior advocate K T S Tulsi, appearing for the Delhi government, as it wanted to know if the government was conscious of the traffic problems that might crop up at other places earmarked for extension of the BRT project. &amp;quot;Arrangements have to be made in advance to solve the problem,&amp;quot; the court said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Earlier, B B Sharan, speaking for Nyaya Bhoomi, had referred to the survey report of CRRI on BRT here and sought its scrapping on the ground that it was harassing commuters and was a waste of public money. Sharan also referred to the master plan to drive home the point that a dedicated BRT corridor cannot be implemented on narrow roads as it would hardly leave any space for other vehicles. The bench asked Sharan to cite case laws to establish that the PIL was maintainable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The decision is a policy decision of the executive and how can it be the subject matter of the PIL?&amp;quot; the bench wanted to know. &amp;quot;Right to equality (in using road space) has been infringed by denying car, other vehicle users the requisite road space. Forty-five per cent road space has been eaten away by BRT alone,&amp;quot; Sharan replied. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Times of India, 25 September, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/delhi/Cant-punish-people-for-not-using-public-transport-HC/articleshow/16536265.cms&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;can039t-punish-people-for-not-using-public-transport-hc-abhinav-garg-17280&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 17280,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 17152
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Can&amp;#039;t punish people for not using public transport: HC -Abhinav Garg&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Transport&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Times of India

NEW DELHI: Car users can&#039;t be penalized for not switching to public transport system, Delhi high court observed on Monday while analyzing the effectiveness of the BRT corridor.

&amp;quot;The policy shouldn&#039;t be such that you will be punished...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Times of India&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;NEW DELHI: &lt;/em&gt;Car users can&#039;t be penalized for not switching to public transport system, Delhi high court observed on Monday while analyzing the effectiveness of the BRT corridor.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;The policy shouldn&#039;t be such that you will be punished for doing something... that&#039;s not the way to encourage people to use public transport and discourage use of private vehicles,&amp;quot; a division bench comprising Justice Pradeep Nandrajog and Justice Manmohan Singh remarked while wrapping up a marathon hearing on a PIL that challenges the BRT corridor. HC reserved its orders on the PIL seeking to scrap 5.8km-long Ambedkar Nagar-Moolchand BRT, even as it dismissed a plea by NGO Nyay Bhoomi seeking contempt proceedings against the government.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The court was responding to an argument by Prashant Bhushan, who appeared for an organization that favours the BRT. Bhushan made light of the delays faced by car users on the BRT stretch, saying &amp;quot;unless they (car users) are punished, they will not shift to public transport system&amp;quot;. He also claimed that Central Road Research Institute (CRRI) was not the right body to study the corridor, and HC should instead rope in Unified Traffic and Transportation Infrastructure Planning &amp;amp; Engineering Centre ( UTTIPEC) to assist it in forming a view.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But HC acknowledged that the slow-moving traffic on BRT created problems for car users and others who do not opt for buses, and argued they cannot be punished to shift to public transport. During the four-hour-long hearing, HC heard a cross-section of views from the government, Nyay Bhoomi, CRRI and Bhushan.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It also frowned upon the absence of senior advocate K T S Tulsi, appearing for the Delhi government, as it wanted to know if the government was conscious of the traffic problems that might crop up at other places earmarked for extension of the BRT project. &amp;quot;Arrangements have to be made in advance to solve the problem,&amp;quot; the court said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Earlier, B B Sharan, speaking for Nyaya Bhoomi, had referred to the survey report of CRRI on BRT here and sought its scrapping on the ground that it was harassing commuters and was a waste of public money. Sharan also referred to the master plan to drive home the point that a dedicated BRT corridor cannot be implemented on narrow roads as it would hardly leave any space for other vehicles. The bench asked Sharan to cite case laws to establish that the PIL was maintainable.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;The decision is a policy decision of the executive and how can it be the subject matter of the PIL?&amp;quot; the bench wanted to know. &amp;quot;Right to equality (in using road space) has been infringed by denying car, other vehicle users the requisite road space. Forty-five per cent road space has been eaten away by BRT alone,&amp;quot; Sharan replied. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/can039t-punish-people-for-not-using-public-transport-hc-abhinav-garg-17280.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Can&#039;t punish people for not using public transport: HC -Abhinav Garg | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Times of India

NEW DELHI: Car users can't be penalized for not switching to public transport system, Delhi high court observed on Monday while analyzing the effectiveness of the BRT corridor.

&quot;The policy shouldn't be such that you will be punished..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Can&#039;t punish people for not using public transport: HC -Abhinav Garg</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Times of India<br /><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>Car users can't be penalized for not switching to public transport system, Delhi high court observed on Monday while analyzing the effectiveness of the BRT corridor.<br /><br />&quot;The policy shouldn't be such that you will be punished for doing something... that's not the way to encourage people to use public transport and discourage use of private vehicles,&quot; a division bench comprising Justice Pradeep Nandrajog and Justice Manmohan Singh remarked while wrapping up a marathon hearing on a PIL that challenges the BRT corridor. HC reserved its orders on the PIL seeking to scrap 5.8km-long Ambedkar Nagar-Moolchand BRT, even as it dismissed a plea by NGO Nyay Bhoomi seeking contempt proceedings against the government.<br /><br />The court was responding to an argument by Prashant Bhushan, who appeared for an organization that favours the BRT. Bhushan made light of the delays faced by car users on the BRT stretch, saying &quot;unless they (car users) are punished, they will not shift to public transport system&quot;. He also claimed that Central Road Research Institute (CRRI) was not the right body to study the corridor, and HC should instead rope in Unified Traffic and Transportation Infrastructure Planning &amp; Engineering Centre ( UTTIPEC) to assist it in forming a view.<br /><br />But HC acknowledged that the slow-moving traffic on BRT created problems for car users and others who do not opt for buses, and argued they cannot be punished to shift to public transport. During the four-hour-long hearing, HC heard a cross-section of views from the government, Nyay Bhoomi, CRRI and Bhushan.<br /><br />It also frowned upon the absence of senior advocate K T S Tulsi, appearing for the Delhi government, as it wanted to know if the government was conscious of the traffic problems that might crop up at other places earmarked for extension of the BRT project. &quot;Arrangements have to be made in advance to solve the problem,&quot; the court said.<br /><br />Earlier, B B Sharan, speaking for Nyaya Bhoomi, had referred to the survey report of CRRI on BRT here and sought its scrapping on the ground that it was harassing commuters and was a waste of public money. Sharan also referred to the master plan to drive home the point that a dedicated BRT corridor cannot be implemented on narrow roads as it would hardly leave any space for other vehicles. The bench asked Sharan to cite case laws to establish that the PIL was maintainable.<br /><br />&quot;The decision is a policy decision of the executive and how can it be the subject matter of the PIL?&quot; the bench wanted to know. &quot;Right to equality (in using road space) has been infringed by denying car, other vehicle users the requisite road space. Forty-five per cent road space has been eaten away by BRT alone,&quot; Sharan replied. <br /></div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 17152,
		'title' => 'Can't punish people for not using public transport: HC -Abhinav Garg',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Times of India<br />
<br />
<em>NEW DELHI: </em>Car users can't be penalized for not switching to public transport system, Delhi high court observed on Monday while analyzing the effectiveness of the BRT corridor.<br />
<br />
&quot;The policy shouldn't be such that you will be punished for doing something... that's not the way to encourage people to use public transport and discourage use of private vehicles,&quot; a division bench comprising Justice Pradeep Nandrajog and Justice Manmohan Singh remarked while wrapping up a marathon hearing on a PIL that challenges the BRT corridor. HC reserved its orders on the PIL seeking to scrap 5.8km-long Ambedkar Nagar-Moolchand BRT, even as it dismissed a plea by NGO Nyay Bhoomi seeking contempt proceedings against the government.<br />
<br />
The court was responding to an argument by Prashant Bhushan, who appeared for an organization that favours the BRT. Bhushan made light of the delays faced by car users on the BRT stretch, saying &quot;unless they (car users) are punished, they will not shift to public transport system&quot;. He also claimed that Central Road Research Institute (CRRI) was not the right body to study the corridor, and HC should instead rope in Unified Traffic and Transportation Infrastructure Planning &amp; Engineering Centre ( UTTIPEC) to assist it in forming a view.<br />
<br />
But HC acknowledged that the slow-moving traffic on BRT created problems for car users and others who do not opt for buses, and argued they cannot be punished to shift to public transport. During the four-hour-long hearing, HC heard a cross-section of views from the government, Nyay Bhoomi, CRRI and Bhushan.<br />
<br />
It also frowned upon the absence of senior advocate K T S Tulsi, appearing for the Delhi government, as it wanted to know if the government was conscious of the traffic problems that might crop up at other places earmarked for extension of the BRT project. &quot;Arrangements have to be made in advance to solve the problem,&quot; the court said.<br />
<br />
Earlier, B B Sharan, speaking for Nyaya Bhoomi, had referred to the survey report of CRRI on BRT here and sought its scrapping on the ground that it was harassing commuters and was a waste of public money. Sharan also referred to the master plan to drive home the point that a dedicated BRT corridor cannot be implemented on narrow roads as it would hardly leave any space for other vehicles. The bench asked Sharan to cite case laws to establish that the PIL was maintainable.<br />
<br />
&quot;The decision is a policy decision of the executive and how can it be the subject matter of the PIL?&quot; the bench wanted to know. &quot;Right to equality (in using road space) has been infringed by denying car, other vehicle users the requisite road space. Forty-five per cent road space has been eaten away by BRT alone,&quot; Sharan replied. <br />
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 25 September, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/delhi/Cant-punish-people-for-not-using-public-transport-HC/articleshow/16536265.cms',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'can039t-punish-people-for-not-using-public-transport-hc-abhinav-garg-17280',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 17280,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 17152,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Can&#039;t punish people for not using public transport: HC -Abhinav Garg',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Transport',
	'metaDesc' => '
-The Times of India

NEW DELHI: Car users can't be penalized for not switching to public transport system, Delhi high court observed on Monday while analyzing the effectiveness of the BRT corridor.

&quot;The policy shouldn't be such that you will be punished...',
	'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Times of India<br /><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>Car users can't be penalized for not switching to public transport system, Delhi high court observed on Monday while analyzing the effectiveness of the BRT corridor.<br /><br />&quot;The policy shouldn't be such that you will be punished for doing something... that's not the way to encourage people to use public transport and discourage use of private vehicles,&quot; a division bench comprising Justice Pradeep Nandrajog and Justice Manmohan Singh remarked while wrapping up a marathon hearing on a PIL that challenges the BRT corridor. HC reserved its orders on the PIL seeking to scrap 5.8km-long Ambedkar Nagar-Moolchand BRT, even as it dismissed a plea by NGO Nyay Bhoomi seeking contempt proceedings against the government.<br /><br />The court was responding to an argument by Prashant Bhushan, who appeared for an organization that favours the BRT. Bhushan made light of the delays faced by car users on the BRT stretch, saying &quot;unless they (car users) are punished, they will not shift to public transport system&quot;. He also claimed that Central Road Research Institute (CRRI) was not the right body to study the corridor, and HC should instead rope in Unified Traffic and Transportation Infrastructure Planning &amp; Engineering Centre ( UTTIPEC) to assist it in forming a view.<br /><br />But HC acknowledged that the slow-moving traffic on BRT created problems for car users and others who do not opt for buses, and argued they cannot be punished to shift to public transport. During the four-hour-long hearing, HC heard a cross-section of views from the government, Nyay Bhoomi, CRRI and Bhushan.<br /><br />It also frowned upon the absence of senior advocate K T S Tulsi, appearing for the Delhi government, as it wanted to know if the government was conscious of the traffic problems that might crop up at other places earmarked for extension of the BRT project. &quot;Arrangements have to be made in advance to solve the problem,&quot; the court said.<br /><br />Earlier, B B Sharan, speaking for Nyaya Bhoomi, had referred to the survey report of CRRI on BRT here and sought its scrapping on the ground that it was harassing commuters and was a waste of public money. Sharan also referred to the master plan to drive home the point that a dedicated BRT corridor cannot be implemented on narrow roads as it would hardly leave any space for other vehicles. The bench asked Sharan to cite case laws to establish that the PIL was maintainable.<br /><br />&quot;The decision is a policy decision of the executive and how can it be the subject matter of the PIL?&quot; the bench wanted to know. &quot;Right to equality (in using road space) has been infringed by denying car, other vehicle users the requisite road space. Forty-five per cent road space has been eaten away by BRT alone,&quot; Sharan replied. <br /></div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 17152,
	'title' => 'Can&#039;t punish people for not using public transport: HC -Abhinav Garg',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Times of India<br />
<br />
<em>NEW DELHI: </em>Car users can't be penalized for not switching to public transport system, Delhi high court observed on Monday while analyzing the effectiveness of the BRT corridor.<br />
<br />
&quot;The policy shouldn't be such that you will be punished for doing something... that's not the way to encourage people to use public transport and discourage use of private vehicles,&quot; a division bench comprising Justice Pradeep Nandrajog and Justice Manmohan Singh remarked while wrapping up a marathon hearing on a PIL that challenges the BRT corridor. HC reserved its orders on the PIL seeking to scrap 5.8km-long Ambedkar Nagar-Moolchand BRT, even as it dismissed a plea by NGO Nyay Bhoomi seeking contempt proceedings against the government.<br />
<br />
The court was responding to an argument by Prashant Bhushan, who appeared for an organization that favours the BRT. Bhushan made light of the delays faced by car users on the BRT stretch, saying &quot;unless they (car users) are punished, they will not shift to public transport system&quot;. He also claimed that Central Road Research Institute (CRRI) was not the right body to study the corridor, and HC should instead rope in Unified Traffic and Transportation Infrastructure Planning &amp; Engineering Centre ( UTTIPEC) to assist it in forming a view.<br />
<br />
But HC acknowledged that the slow-moving traffic on BRT created problems for car users and others who do not opt for buses, and argued they cannot be punished to shift to public transport. During the four-hour-long hearing, HC heard a cross-section of views from the government, Nyay Bhoomi, CRRI and Bhushan.<br />
<br />
It also frowned upon the absence of senior advocate K T S Tulsi, appearing for the Delhi government, as it wanted to know if the government was conscious of the traffic problems that might crop up at other places earmarked for extension of the BRT project. &quot;Arrangements have to be made in advance to solve the problem,&quot; the court said.<br />
<br />
Earlier, B B Sharan, speaking for Nyaya Bhoomi, had referred to the survey report of CRRI on BRT here and sought its scrapping on the ground that it was harassing commuters and was a waste of public money. Sharan also referred to the master plan to drive home the point that a dedicated BRT corridor cannot be implemented on narrow roads as it would hardly leave any space for other vehicles. The bench asked Sharan to cite case laws to establish that the PIL was maintainable.<br />
<br />
&quot;The decision is a policy decision of the executive and how can it be the subject matter of the PIL?&quot; the bench wanted to know. &quot;Right to equality (in using road space) has been infringed by denying car, other vehicle users the requisite road space. Forty-five per cent road space has been eaten away by BRT alone,&quot; Sharan replied. <br />
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Times of India, 25 September, 2012, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/delhi/Cant-punish-people-for-not-using-public-transport-HC/articleshow/16536265.cms',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'can039t-punish-people-for-not-using-public-transport-hc-abhinav-garg-17280',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 17280,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 17152
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Can&#039;t punish people for not using public transport: HC -Abhinav Garg'
$metaKeywords = 'Transport'
$metaDesc = '
-The Times of India

NEW DELHI: Car users can't be penalized for not switching to public transport system, Delhi high court observed on Monday while analyzing the effectiveness of the BRT corridor.

&quot;The policy shouldn't be such that you will be punished...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-The Times of India<br /><br /><em>NEW DELHI: </em>Car users can't be penalized for not switching to public transport system, Delhi high court observed on Monday while analyzing the effectiveness of the BRT corridor.<br /><br />&quot;The policy shouldn't be such that you will be punished for doing something... that's not the way to encourage people to use public transport and discourage use of private vehicles,&quot; a division bench comprising Justice Pradeep Nandrajog and Justice Manmohan Singh remarked while wrapping up a marathon hearing on a PIL that challenges the BRT corridor. HC reserved its orders on the PIL seeking to scrap 5.8km-long Ambedkar Nagar-Moolchand BRT, even as it dismissed a plea by NGO Nyay Bhoomi seeking contempt proceedings against the government.<br /><br />The court was responding to an argument by Prashant Bhushan, who appeared for an organization that favours the BRT. Bhushan made light of the delays faced by car users on the BRT stretch, saying &quot;unless they (car users) are punished, they will not shift to public transport system&quot;. He also claimed that Central Road Research Institute (CRRI) was not the right body to study the corridor, and HC should instead rope in Unified Traffic and Transportation Infrastructure Planning &amp; Engineering Centre ( UTTIPEC) to assist it in forming a view.<br /><br />But HC acknowledged that the slow-moving traffic on BRT created problems for car users and others who do not opt for buses, and argued they cannot be punished to shift to public transport. During the four-hour-long hearing, HC heard a cross-section of views from the government, Nyay Bhoomi, CRRI and Bhushan.<br /><br />It also frowned upon the absence of senior advocate K T S Tulsi, appearing for the Delhi government, as it wanted to know if the government was conscious of the traffic problems that might crop up at other places earmarked for extension of the BRT project. &quot;Arrangements have to be made in advance to solve the problem,&quot; the court said.<br /><br />Earlier, B B Sharan, speaking for Nyaya Bhoomi, had referred to the survey report of CRRI on BRT here and sought its scrapping on the ground that it was harassing commuters and was a waste of public money. Sharan also referred to the master plan to drive home the point that a dedicated BRT corridor cannot be implemented on narrow roads as it would hardly leave any space for other vehicles. The bench asked Sharan to cite case laws to establish that the PIL was maintainable.<br /><br />&quot;The decision is a policy decision of the executive and how can it be the subject matter of the PIL?&quot; the bench wanted to know. &quot;Right to equality (in using road space) has been infringed by denying car, other vehicle users the requisite road space. Forty-five per cent road space has been eaten away by BRT alone,&quot; Sharan replied. <br /></div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

Can't punish people for not using public transport: HC -Abhinav Garg

-The Times of India NEW DELHI: Car users can't be penalized for not switching to public transport system, Delhi high court observed on Monday while analyzing the effectiveness of the BRT corridor. "The policy shouldn't be such that you will be punished for doing something... that's not the way to encourage people to use public transport and discourage use of private vehicles," a division bench comprising Justice Pradeep Nandrajog and Justice Manmohan Singh remarked while wrapping up a marathon hearing on a PIL that challenges the BRT corridor. HC reserved its orders on the PIL seeking to scrap 5.8km-long Ambedkar Nagar-Moolchand BRT, even as it dismissed a plea by NGO Nyay Bhoomi seeking contempt proceedings against the government. The court was responding to an argument by Prashant Bhushan, who appeared for an organization that favours the BRT. Bhushan made light of the delays faced by car users on the BRT stretch, saying "unless they (car users) are punished, they will not shift to public transport system". He also claimed that Central Road Research Institute (CRRI) was not the right body to study the corridor, and HC should instead rope in Unified Traffic and Transportation Infrastructure Planning & Engineering Centre ( UTTIPEC) to assist it in forming a view. But HC acknowledged that the slow-moving traffic on BRT created problems for car users and others who do not opt for buses, and argued they cannot be punished to shift to public transport. During the four-hour-long hearing, HC heard a cross-section of views from the government, Nyay Bhoomi, CRRI and Bhushan. It also frowned upon the absence of senior advocate K T S Tulsi, appearing for the Delhi government, as it wanted to know if the government was conscious of the traffic problems that might crop up at other places earmarked for extension of the BRT project. "Arrangements have to be made in advance to solve the problem," the court said. Earlier, B B Sharan, speaking for Nyaya Bhoomi, had referred to the survey report of CRRI on BRT here and sought its scrapping on the ground that it was harassing commuters and was a waste of public money. Sharan also referred to the master plan to drive home the point that a dedicated BRT corridor cannot be implemented on narrow roads as it would hardly leave any space for other vehicles. The bench asked Sharan to cite case laws to establish that the PIL was maintainable. "The decision is a policy decision of the executive and how can it be the subject matter of the PIL?" the bench wanted to know. "Right to equality (in using road space) has been infringed by denying car, other vehicle users the requisite road space. Forty-five per cent road space has been eaten away by BRT alone," Sharan replied.