Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 73,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'catslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 73,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/centre-cites-sc-on-coal-16868/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/centre-cites-sc-on-coal-16868/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'catslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]
Code Context


        trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);

    }
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74
 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.'
$stackFrame = (int) 1
$trace = [
	(int) 0 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php',
		'line' => (int) 2421,
		'function' => 'deprecationWarning',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.'
		]
	],
	(int) 1 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
		'line' => (int) 74,
		'function' => 'offsetGet',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
		]
	],
	(int) 2 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php',
		'line' => (int) 610,
		'function' => 'printArticle',
		'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 3 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 120,
		'function' => 'invokeAction',
		'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller',
		'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	],
	(int) 4 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php',
		'line' => (int) 94,
		'function' => '_invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 5 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php',
		'line' => (int) 235,
		'function' => 'dispatch',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 6 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication',
		'object' => object(App\Application) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 7 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 162,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 8 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 9 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 88,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 10 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 11 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php',
		'line' => (int) 96,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 12 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 65,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware',
		'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 13 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php',
		'line' => (int) 51,
		'function' => '__invoke',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 14 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php',
		'line' => (int) 98,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => [
			(int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {},
			(int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {},
			(int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}
		]
	],
	(int) 15 => [
		'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php',
		'line' => (int) 39,
		'function' => 'run',
		'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server',
		'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {},
		'type' => '->',
		'args' => []
	]
]
$frame = [
	'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php',
	'line' => (int) 74,
	'function' => 'offsetGet',
	'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest',
	'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {
		trustProxy => false
		[protected] params => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] cookies => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _environment => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/centre-cites-sc-on-coal-16868/print'
		[protected] base => ''
		[protected] webroot => '/'
		[protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/centre-cites-sc-on-coal-16868/print'
		[protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] _input => null
		[protected] _detectors => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] _detectorCache => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {}
		[protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {}
		[protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {}
		[protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] emulatedAttributes => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
		[protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]]
		[protected] protocol => null
		[protected] requestTarget => null
		[private] deprecatedProperties => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	},
	'type' => '->',
	'args' => [
		(int) 0 => 'artileslug'
	]
]
deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311
Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421
App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74
Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98

Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]
Code Context
            if (Configure::read('debug')) {

                trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);

            } else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6803f91616806-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6803f91616806-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6803f91616806-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6803f91616806-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6803f91616806-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6803f91616806-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6803f91616806-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6803f91616806-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6803f91616806-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16740,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Centre cites SC on coal&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The government today dug out a 2006 verdict to argue that the Supreme Court was against auction of coal blocks as law minister Salman Khurshid questioned the presumptive revenue loss of Rs 1.86 lakh crore in the allocation of 57 blocks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Congress spokesperson Manish Tewari, who addressed a joint media conference with Khurshid, read out the verdict that had nullified the NDA government&amp;rsquo;s plan for e-auction of coal blocks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The verdict had said the central government and coal companies were expected to &amp;ldquo;harmonise the business potential of a country to benefit the common man&amp;rdquo;, and the state, while fixing the price for the purpose of equitable distribution or otherwise, &amp;ldquo;cannot be actuated purely by a profit motive&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;It should not discharge its functions in such a way as to aspire to earn huge profit especially at the cost of those who are fully dependent upon them for the supply of a monopoly item like coal. The methodology for allocation of coal to a bidder of e-auction is thus inequitable, irrational and fatuous. The scheme of e-auction, is therefore, ultra vires of the Constitution of India.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Khurshid said the government could not have ignored this view while formulating policies. He also referred to the presidential reference the government has moved in the Supreme Court on auction of valuable natural resources in the context of a 2G verdict that made auction of such resources mandatory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Khurshid then proceeded to question the Rs 1.86 lakh crore figure in the CAG report, which said the loss resulted because of the allocation of the 57 blocks without competitive bidding.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;In the same paragraph where this amount is mentioned in the report, the CAG says a part of this financial gain could have been tapped by the government by taking timely decision on competitive bidding for allocation of coal blocks,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This means, he argued, even the CAG is not saying anybody caused a loss of Rs 1.86 lakh crore.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Khurshid said the CAG should have clarified what portion of this amount could the government have tapped. &amp;ldquo;Majority of it, half of it, 25, 15 or 5 per cent, how much? Out of this amount, the companies have to pay royalty of 14 per cent, which some estimates put at 90,000 crore. The earning will then attract corporate tax. Even the price depends on grade of coal and net present value.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Asked about the demand for cancelling the allocations, he said: &amp;ldquo;No de-allocation will happen because of the CAG report or the Opposition&amp;rsquo;s ruckus.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Bills passed&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The government today passed the Chemical Weapons Convention (Amendment) Bill and the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (Amendment) Bill in the Lok Sabha by voice vote without discussion.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 31 August, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1120831/jsp/nation/story_15918809.jsp#.UEAWtqAXVwc&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;centre-cites-sc-on-coal-16868&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 16868,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 16740,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Centre cites SC on coal&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Comptroller and Auditor-General,CAG,Mining&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Telegraph

The government today dug out a 2006 verdict to argue that the Supreme Court was against auction of coal blocks as law minister Salman Khurshid questioned the presumptive revenue loss of Rs 1.86 lakh crore in the allocation of...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The government today dug out a 2006 verdict to argue that the Supreme Court was against auction of coal blocks as law minister Salman Khurshid questioned the presumptive revenue loss of Rs 1.86 lakh crore in the allocation of 57 blocks.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Congress spokesperson Manish Tewari, who addressed a joint media conference with Khurshid, read out the verdict that had nullified the NDA government&amp;rsquo;s plan for e-auction of coal blocks.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The verdict had said the central government and coal companies were expected to &amp;ldquo;harmonise the business potential of a country to benefit the common man&amp;rdquo;, and the state, while fixing the price for the purpose of equitable distribution or otherwise, &amp;ldquo;cannot be actuated purely by a profit motive&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;It should not discharge its functions in such a way as to aspire to earn huge profit especially at the cost of those who are fully dependent upon them for the supply of a monopoly item like coal. The methodology for allocation of coal to a bidder of e-auction is thus inequitable, irrational and fatuous. The scheme of e-auction, is therefore, ultra vires of the Constitution of India.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Khurshid said the government could not have ignored this view while formulating policies. He also referred to the presidential reference the government has moved in the Supreme Court on auction of valuable natural resources in the context of a 2G verdict that made auction of such resources mandatory.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Khurshid then proceeded to question the Rs 1.86 lakh crore figure in the CAG report, which said the loss resulted because of the allocation of the 57 blocks without competitive bidding.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;In the same paragraph where this amount is mentioned in the report, the CAG says a part of this financial gain could have been tapped by the government by taking timely decision on competitive bidding for allocation of coal blocks,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This means, he argued, even the CAG is not saying anybody caused a loss of Rs 1.86 lakh crore.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Khurshid said the CAG should have clarified what portion of this amount could the government have tapped. &amp;ldquo;Majority of it, half of it, 25, 15 or 5 per cent, how much? Out of this amount, the companies have to pay royalty of 14 per cent, which some estimates put at 90,000 crore. The earning will then attract corporate tax. Even the price depends on grade of coal and net present value.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Asked about the demand for cancelling the allocations, he said: &amp;ldquo;No de-allocation will happen because of the CAG report or the Opposition&amp;rsquo;s ruckus.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Bills passed&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The government today passed the Chemical Weapons Convention (Amendment) Bill and the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (Amendment) Bill in the Lok Sabha by voice vote without discussion.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16740,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Centre cites SC on coal&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The government today dug out a 2006 verdict to argue that the Supreme Court was against auction of coal blocks as law minister Salman Khurshid questioned the presumptive revenue loss of Rs 1.86 lakh crore in the allocation of 57 blocks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Congress spokesperson Manish Tewari, who addressed a joint media conference with Khurshid, read out the verdict that had nullified the NDA government&amp;rsquo;s plan for e-auction of coal blocks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The verdict had said the central government and coal companies were expected to &amp;ldquo;harmonise the business potential of a country to benefit the common man&amp;rdquo;, and the state, while fixing the price for the purpose of equitable distribution or otherwise, &amp;ldquo;cannot be actuated purely by a profit motive&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;It should not discharge its functions in such a way as to aspire to earn huge profit especially at the cost of those who are fully dependent upon them for the supply of a monopoly item like coal. The methodology for allocation of coal to a bidder of e-auction is thus inequitable, irrational and fatuous. The scheme of e-auction, is therefore, ultra vires of the Constitution of India.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Khurshid said the government could not have ignored this view while formulating policies. He also referred to the presidential reference the government has moved in the Supreme Court on auction of valuable natural resources in the context of a 2G verdict that made auction of such resources mandatory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Khurshid then proceeded to question the Rs 1.86 lakh crore figure in the CAG report, which said the loss resulted because of the allocation of the 57 blocks without competitive bidding.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;In the same paragraph where this amount is mentioned in the report, the CAG says a part of this financial gain could have been tapped by the government by taking timely decision on competitive bidding for allocation of coal blocks,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This means, he argued, even the CAG is not saying anybody caused a loss of Rs 1.86 lakh crore.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Khurshid said the CAG should have clarified what portion of this amount could the government have tapped. &amp;ldquo;Majority of it, half of it, 25, 15 or 5 per cent, how much? Out of this amount, the companies have to pay royalty of 14 per cent, which some estimates put at 90,000 crore. The earning will then attract corporate tax. Even the price depends on grade of coal and net present value.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Asked about the demand for cancelling the allocations, he said: &amp;ldquo;No de-allocation will happen because of the CAG report or the Opposition&amp;rsquo;s ruckus.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Bills passed&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The government today passed the Chemical Weapons Convention (Amendment) Bill and the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (Amendment) Bill in the Lok Sabha by voice vote without discussion.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 31 August, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1120831/jsp/nation/story_15918809.jsp#.UEAWtqAXVwc&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;centre-cites-sc-on-coal-16868&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 16868,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 16740
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Centre cites SC on coal&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Comptroller and Auditor-General,CAG,Mining&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Telegraph

The government today dug out a 2006 verdict to argue that the Supreme Court was against auction of coal blocks as law minister Salman Khurshid questioned the presumptive revenue loss of Rs 1.86 lakh crore in the allocation of...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The government today dug out a 2006 verdict to argue that the Supreme Court was against auction of coal blocks as law minister Salman Khurshid questioned the presumptive revenue loss of Rs 1.86 lakh crore in the allocation of 57 blocks.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Congress spokesperson Manish Tewari, who addressed a joint media conference with Khurshid, read out the verdict that had nullified the NDA government&amp;rsquo;s plan for e-auction of coal blocks.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The verdict had said the central government and coal companies were expected to &amp;ldquo;harmonise the business potential of a country to benefit the common man&amp;rdquo;, and the state, while fixing the price for the purpose of equitable distribution or otherwise, &amp;ldquo;cannot be actuated purely by a profit motive&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;It should not discharge its functions in such a way as to aspire to earn huge profit especially at the cost of those who are fully dependent upon them for the supply of a monopoly item like coal. The methodology for allocation of coal to a bidder of e-auction is thus inequitable, irrational and fatuous. The scheme of e-auction, is therefore, ultra vires of the Constitution of India.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Khurshid said the government could not have ignored this view while formulating policies. He also referred to the presidential reference the government has moved in the Supreme Court on auction of valuable natural resources in the context of a 2G verdict that made auction of such resources mandatory.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Khurshid then proceeded to question the Rs 1.86 lakh crore figure in the CAG report, which said the loss resulted because of the allocation of the 57 blocks without competitive bidding.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;In the same paragraph where this amount is mentioned in the report, the CAG says a part of this financial gain could have been tapped by the government by taking timely decision on competitive bidding for allocation of coal blocks,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This means, he argued, even the CAG is not saying anybody caused a loss of Rs 1.86 lakh crore.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Khurshid said the CAG should have clarified what portion of this amount could the government have tapped. &amp;ldquo;Majority of it, half of it, 25, 15 or 5 per cent, how much? Out of this amount, the companies have to pay royalty of 14 per cent, which some estimates put at 90,000 crore. The earning will then attract corporate tax. Even the price depends on grade of coal and net present value.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Asked about the demand for cancelling the allocations, he said: &amp;ldquo;No de-allocation will happen because of the CAG report or the Opposition&amp;rsquo;s ruckus.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Bills passed&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The government today passed the Chemical Weapons Convention (Amendment) Bill and the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (Amendment) Bill in the Lok Sabha by voice vote without discussion.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/centre-cites-sc-on-coal-16868.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Centre cites SC on coal | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Telegraph

The government today dug out a 2006 verdict to argue that the Supreme Court was against auction of coal blocks as law minister Salman Khurshid questioned the presumptive revenue loss of Rs 1.86 lakh crore in the allocation of..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Centre cites SC on coal</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br />The government today dug out a 2006 verdict to argue that the Supreme Court was against auction of coal blocks as law minister Salman Khurshid questioned the presumptive revenue loss of Rs 1.86 lakh crore in the allocation of 57 blocks.<br /><br />Congress spokesperson Manish Tewari, who addressed a joint media conference with Khurshid, read out the verdict that had nullified the NDA government&rsquo;s plan for e-auction of coal blocks.<br /><br />The verdict had said the central government and coal companies were expected to &ldquo;harmonise the business potential of a country to benefit the common man&rdquo;, and the state, while fixing the price for the purpose of equitable distribution or otherwise, &ldquo;cannot be actuated purely by a profit motive&rdquo;.<br /><br />&ldquo;It should not discharge its functions in such a way as to aspire to earn huge profit especially at the cost of those who are fully dependent upon them for the supply of a monopoly item like coal. The methodology for allocation of coal to a bidder of e-auction is thus inequitable, irrational and fatuous. The scheme of e-auction, is therefore, ultra vires of the Constitution of India.&rdquo;<br /><br />Khurshid said the government could not have ignored this view while formulating policies. He also referred to the presidential reference the government has moved in the Supreme Court on auction of valuable natural resources in the context of a 2G verdict that made auction of such resources mandatory.<br /><br />Khurshid then proceeded to question the Rs 1.86 lakh crore figure in the CAG report, which said the loss resulted because of the allocation of the 57 blocks without competitive bidding.<br /><br />&ldquo;In the same paragraph where this amount is mentioned in the report, the CAG says a part of this financial gain could have been tapped by the government by taking timely decision on competitive bidding for allocation of coal blocks,&rdquo; he said.<br /><br />This means, he argued, even the CAG is not saying anybody caused a loss of Rs 1.86 lakh crore.<br /><br />Khurshid said the CAG should have clarified what portion of this amount could the government have tapped. &ldquo;Majority of it, half of it, 25, 15 or 5 per cent, how much? Out of this amount, the companies have to pay royalty of 14 per cent, which some estimates put at 90,000 crore. The earning will then attract corporate tax. Even the price depends on grade of coal and net present value.&rdquo;<br /><br />Asked about the demand for cancelling the allocations, he said: &ldquo;No de-allocation will happen because of the CAG report or the Opposition&rsquo;s ruckus.&rdquo;<br /><em><br />Bills passed</em><br /><br />The government today passed the Chemical Weapons Convention (Amendment) Bill and the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (Amendment) Bill in the Lok Sabha by voice vote without discussion.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$maxBufferLength = (int) 8192
$file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php'
$line = (int) 853
$message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]
Code Context
            $response->getStatusCode(),

            ($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')

        ));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6803f91616806-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6803f91616806-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6803f91616806-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6803f91616806-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6803f91616806-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6803f91616806-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6803f91616806-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6803f91616806-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6803f91616806-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16740,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Centre cites SC on coal&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The government today dug out a 2006 verdict to argue that the Supreme Court was against auction of coal blocks as law minister Salman Khurshid questioned the presumptive revenue loss of Rs 1.86 lakh crore in the allocation of 57 blocks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Congress spokesperson Manish Tewari, who addressed a joint media conference with Khurshid, read out the verdict that had nullified the NDA government&amp;rsquo;s plan for e-auction of coal blocks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The verdict had said the central government and coal companies were expected to &amp;ldquo;harmonise the business potential of a country to benefit the common man&amp;rdquo;, and the state, while fixing the price for the purpose of equitable distribution or otherwise, &amp;ldquo;cannot be actuated purely by a profit motive&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;It should not discharge its functions in such a way as to aspire to earn huge profit especially at the cost of those who are fully dependent upon them for the supply of a monopoly item like coal. The methodology for allocation of coal to a bidder of e-auction is thus inequitable, irrational and fatuous. The scheme of e-auction, is therefore, ultra vires of the Constitution of India.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Khurshid said the government could not have ignored this view while formulating policies. He also referred to the presidential reference the government has moved in the Supreme Court on auction of valuable natural resources in the context of a 2G verdict that made auction of such resources mandatory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Khurshid then proceeded to question the Rs 1.86 lakh crore figure in the CAG report, which said the loss resulted because of the allocation of the 57 blocks without competitive bidding.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;In the same paragraph where this amount is mentioned in the report, the CAG says a part of this financial gain could have been tapped by the government by taking timely decision on competitive bidding for allocation of coal blocks,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This means, he argued, even the CAG is not saying anybody caused a loss of Rs 1.86 lakh crore.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Khurshid said the CAG should have clarified what portion of this amount could the government have tapped. &amp;ldquo;Majority of it, half of it, 25, 15 or 5 per cent, how much? Out of this amount, the companies have to pay royalty of 14 per cent, which some estimates put at 90,000 crore. The earning will then attract corporate tax. Even the price depends on grade of coal and net present value.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Asked about the demand for cancelling the allocations, he said: &amp;ldquo;No de-allocation will happen because of the CAG report or the Opposition&amp;rsquo;s ruckus.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Bills passed&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The government today passed the Chemical Weapons Convention (Amendment) Bill and the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (Amendment) Bill in the Lok Sabha by voice vote without discussion.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 31 August, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1120831/jsp/nation/story_15918809.jsp#.UEAWtqAXVwc&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;centre-cites-sc-on-coal-16868&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 16868,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 16740,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Centre cites SC on coal&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Comptroller and Auditor-General,CAG,Mining&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Telegraph

The government today dug out a 2006 verdict to argue that the Supreme Court was against auction of coal blocks as law minister Salman Khurshid questioned the presumptive revenue loss of Rs 1.86 lakh crore in the allocation of...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The government today dug out a 2006 verdict to argue that the Supreme Court was against auction of coal blocks as law minister Salman Khurshid questioned the presumptive revenue loss of Rs 1.86 lakh crore in the allocation of 57 blocks.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Congress spokesperson Manish Tewari, who addressed a joint media conference with Khurshid, read out the verdict that had nullified the NDA government&amp;rsquo;s plan for e-auction of coal blocks.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The verdict had said the central government and coal companies were expected to &amp;ldquo;harmonise the business potential of a country to benefit the common man&amp;rdquo;, and the state, while fixing the price for the purpose of equitable distribution or otherwise, &amp;ldquo;cannot be actuated purely by a profit motive&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;It should not discharge its functions in such a way as to aspire to earn huge profit especially at the cost of those who are fully dependent upon them for the supply of a monopoly item like coal. The methodology for allocation of coal to a bidder of e-auction is thus inequitable, irrational and fatuous. The scheme of e-auction, is therefore, ultra vires of the Constitution of India.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Khurshid said the government could not have ignored this view while formulating policies. He also referred to the presidential reference the government has moved in the Supreme Court on auction of valuable natural resources in the context of a 2G verdict that made auction of such resources mandatory.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Khurshid then proceeded to question the Rs 1.86 lakh crore figure in the CAG report, which said the loss resulted because of the allocation of the 57 blocks without competitive bidding.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;In the same paragraph where this amount is mentioned in the report, the CAG says a part of this financial gain could have been tapped by the government by taking timely decision on competitive bidding for allocation of coal blocks,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This means, he argued, even the CAG is not saying anybody caused a loss of Rs 1.86 lakh crore.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Khurshid said the CAG should have clarified what portion of this amount could the government have tapped. &amp;ldquo;Majority of it, half of it, 25, 15 or 5 per cent, how much? Out of this amount, the companies have to pay royalty of 14 per cent, which some estimates put at 90,000 crore. The earning will then attract corporate tax. Even the price depends on grade of coal and net present value.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Asked about the demand for cancelling the allocations, he said: &amp;ldquo;No de-allocation will happen because of the CAG report or the Opposition&amp;rsquo;s ruckus.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Bills passed&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The government today passed the Chemical Weapons Convention (Amendment) Bill and the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (Amendment) Bill in the Lok Sabha by voice vote without discussion.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16740,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Centre cites SC on coal&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The government today dug out a 2006 verdict to argue that the Supreme Court was against auction of coal blocks as law minister Salman Khurshid questioned the presumptive revenue loss of Rs 1.86 lakh crore in the allocation of 57 blocks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Congress spokesperson Manish Tewari, who addressed a joint media conference with Khurshid, read out the verdict that had nullified the NDA government&amp;rsquo;s plan for e-auction of coal blocks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The verdict had said the central government and coal companies were expected to &amp;ldquo;harmonise the business potential of a country to benefit the common man&amp;rdquo;, and the state, while fixing the price for the purpose of equitable distribution or otherwise, &amp;ldquo;cannot be actuated purely by a profit motive&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;It should not discharge its functions in such a way as to aspire to earn huge profit especially at the cost of those who are fully dependent upon them for the supply of a monopoly item like coal. The methodology for allocation of coal to a bidder of e-auction is thus inequitable, irrational and fatuous. The scheme of e-auction, is therefore, ultra vires of the Constitution of India.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Khurshid said the government could not have ignored this view while formulating policies. He also referred to the presidential reference the government has moved in the Supreme Court on auction of valuable natural resources in the context of a 2G verdict that made auction of such resources mandatory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Khurshid then proceeded to question the Rs 1.86 lakh crore figure in the CAG report, which said the loss resulted because of the allocation of the 57 blocks without competitive bidding.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;In the same paragraph where this amount is mentioned in the report, the CAG says a part of this financial gain could have been tapped by the government by taking timely decision on competitive bidding for allocation of coal blocks,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This means, he argued, even the CAG is not saying anybody caused a loss of Rs 1.86 lakh crore.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Khurshid said the CAG should have clarified what portion of this amount could the government have tapped. &amp;ldquo;Majority of it, half of it, 25, 15 or 5 per cent, how much? Out of this amount, the companies have to pay royalty of 14 per cent, which some estimates put at 90,000 crore. The earning will then attract corporate tax. Even the price depends on grade of coal and net present value.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Asked about the demand for cancelling the allocations, he said: &amp;ldquo;No de-allocation will happen because of the CAG report or the Opposition&amp;rsquo;s ruckus.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Bills passed&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The government today passed the Chemical Weapons Convention (Amendment) Bill and the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (Amendment) Bill in the Lok Sabha by voice vote without discussion.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 31 August, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1120831/jsp/nation/story_15918809.jsp#.UEAWtqAXVwc&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;centre-cites-sc-on-coal-16868&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 16868,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 16740
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Centre cites SC on coal&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Comptroller and Auditor-General,CAG,Mining&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Telegraph

The government today dug out a 2006 verdict to argue that the Supreme Court was against auction of coal blocks as law minister Salman Khurshid questioned the presumptive revenue loss of Rs 1.86 lakh crore in the allocation of...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The government today dug out a 2006 verdict to argue that the Supreme Court was against auction of coal blocks as law minister Salman Khurshid questioned the presumptive revenue loss of Rs 1.86 lakh crore in the allocation of 57 blocks.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Congress spokesperson Manish Tewari, who addressed a joint media conference with Khurshid, read out the verdict that had nullified the NDA government&amp;rsquo;s plan for e-auction of coal blocks.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The verdict had said the central government and coal companies were expected to &amp;ldquo;harmonise the business potential of a country to benefit the common man&amp;rdquo;, and the state, while fixing the price for the purpose of equitable distribution or otherwise, &amp;ldquo;cannot be actuated purely by a profit motive&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;It should not discharge its functions in such a way as to aspire to earn huge profit especially at the cost of those who are fully dependent upon them for the supply of a monopoly item like coal. The methodology for allocation of coal to a bidder of e-auction is thus inequitable, irrational and fatuous. The scheme of e-auction, is therefore, ultra vires of the Constitution of India.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Khurshid said the government could not have ignored this view while formulating policies. He also referred to the presidential reference the government has moved in the Supreme Court on auction of valuable natural resources in the context of a 2G verdict that made auction of such resources mandatory.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Khurshid then proceeded to question the Rs 1.86 lakh crore figure in the CAG report, which said the loss resulted because of the allocation of the 57 blocks without competitive bidding.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;In the same paragraph where this amount is mentioned in the report, the CAG says a part of this financial gain could have been tapped by the government by taking timely decision on competitive bidding for allocation of coal blocks,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This means, he argued, even the CAG is not saying anybody caused a loss of Rs 1.86 lakh crore.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Khurshid said the CAG should have clarified what portion of this amount could the government have tapped. &amp;ldquo;Majority of it, half of it, 25, 15 or 5 per cent, how much? Out of this amount, the companies have to pay royalty of 14 per cent, which some estimates put at 90,000 crore. The earning will then attract corporate tax. Even the price depends on grade of coal and net present value.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Asked about the demand for cancelling the allocations, he said: &amp;ldquo;No de-allocation will happen because of the CAG report or the Opposition&amp;rsquo;s ruckus.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Bills passed&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The government today passed the Chemical Weapons Convention (Amendment) Bill and the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (Amendment) Bill in the Lok Sabha by voice vote without discussion.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/centre-cites-sc-on-coal-16868.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Centre cites SC on coal | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Telegraph

The government today dug out a 2006 verdict to argue that the Supreme Court was against auction of coal blocks as law minister Salman Khurshid questioned the presumptive revenue loss of Rs 1.86 lakh crore in the allocation of..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Centre cites SC on coal</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br />The government today dug out a 2006 verdict to argue that the Supreme Court was against auction of coal blocks as law minister Salman Khurshid questioned the presumptive revenue loss of Rs 1.86 lakh crore in the allocation of 57 blocks.<br /><br />Congress spokesperson Manish Tewari, who addressed a joint media conference with Khurshid, read out the verdict that had nullified the NDA government&rsquo;s plan for e-auction of coal blocks.<br /><br />The verdict had said the central government and coal companies were expected to &ldquo;harmonise the business potential of a country to benefit the common man&rdquo;, and the state, while fixing the price for the purpose of equitable distribution or otherwise, &ldquo;cannot be actuated purely by a profit motive&rdquo;.<br /><br />&ldquo;It should not discharge its functions in such a way as to aspire to earn huge profit especially at the cost of those who are fully dependent upon them for the supply of a monopoly item like coal. The methodology for allocation of coal to a bidder of e-auction is thus inequitable, irrational and fatuous. The scheme of e-auction, is therefore, ultra vires of the Constitution of India.&rdquo;<br /><br />Khurshid said the government could not have ignored this view while formulating policies. He also referred to the presidential reference the government has moved in the Supreme Court on auction of valuable natural resources in the context of a 2G verdict that made auction of such resources mandatory.<br /><br />Khurshid then proceeded to question the Rs 1.86 lakh crore figure in the CAG report, which said the loss resulted because of the allocation of the 57 blocks without competitive bidding.<br /><br />&ldquo;In the same paragraph where this amount is mentioned in the report, the CAG says a part of this financial gain could have been tapped by the government by taking timely decision on competitive bidding for allocation of coal blocks,&rdquo; he said.<br /><br />This means, he argued, even the CAG is not saying anybody caused a loss of Rs 1.86 lakh crore.<br /><br />Khurshid said the CAG should have clarified what portion of this amount could the government have tapped. &ldquo;Majority of it, half of it, 25, 15 or 5 per cent, how much? Out of this amount, the companies have to pay royalty of 14 per cent, which some estimates put at 90,000 crore. The earning will then attract corporate tax. Even the price depends on grade of coal and net present value.&rdquo;<br /><br />Asked about the demand for cancelling the allocations, he said: &ldquo;No de-allocation will happen because of the CAG report or the Opposition&rsquo;s ruckus.&rdquo;<br /><em><br />Bills passed</em><br /><br />The government today passed the Chemical Weapons Convention (Amendment) Bill and the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (Amendment) Bill in the Lok Sabha by voice vote without discussion.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$reasonPhrase = 'OK'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]
Code Context
                    $value

                ), $first);

                $first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) {

	'status' => (int) 200,
	'contentType' => 'text/html',
	'headers' => [
		'Content-Type' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		]
	],
	'file' => null,
	'fileRange' => [],
	'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {},
	'cacheDirectives' => [],
	'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
    <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6803f91616806-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6803f91616806-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr6803f91616806-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6803f91616806-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6803f91616806-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr6803f91616806-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr6803f91616806-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr6803f91616806-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">&gt;
</span></span></code>
<span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&lt;link&nbsp;rel="canonical"&nbsp;href="<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">);&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>/<span style="color: #0000BB">&lt;?php&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">echo&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-&gt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?&gt;</span>.html"/&gt;
</span></code></span>
<code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB">&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #007700">&lt;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta&nbsp;http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type"&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html;&nbsp;charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/&gt;
</span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr6803f91616806-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = &#039;/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp&#039;
$dataForView = [
	&#039;article_current&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16740,
		&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Centre cites SC on coal&#039;,
		&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The government today dug out a 2006 verdict to argue that the Supreme Court was against auction of coal blocks as law minister Salman Khurshid questioned the presumptive revenue loss of Rs 1.86 lakh crore in the allocation of 57 blocks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Congress spokesperson Manish Tewari, who addressed a joint media conference with Khurshid, read out the verdict that had nullified the NDA government&amp;rsquo;s plan for e-auction of coal blocks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The verdict had said the central government and coal companies were expected to &amp;ldquo;harmonise the business potential of a country to benefit the common man&amp;rdquo;, and the state, while fixing the price for the purpose of equitable distribution or otherwise, &amp;ldquo;cannot be actuated purely by a profit motive&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;It should not discharge its functions in such a way as to aspire to earn huge profit especially at the cost of those who are fully dependent upon them for the supply of a monopoly item like coal. The methodology for allocation of coal to a bidder of e-auction is thus inequitable, irrational and fatuous. The scheme of e-auction, is therefore, ultra vires of the Constitution of India.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Khurshid said the government could not have ignored this view while formulating policies. He also referred to the presidential reference the government has moved in the Supreme Court on auction of valuable natural resources in the context of a 2G verdict that made auction of such resources mandatory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Khurshid then proceeded to question the Rs 1.86 lakh crore figure in the CAG report, which said the loss resulted because of the allocation of the 57 blocks without competitive bidding.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;In the same paragraph where this amount is mentioned in the report, the CAG says a part of this financial gain could have been tapped by the government by taking timely decision on competitive bidding for allocation of coal blocks,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This means, he argued, even the CAG is not saying anybody caused a loss of Rs 1.86 lakh crore.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Khurshid said the CAG should have clarified what portion of this amount could the government have tapped. &amp;ldquo;Majority of it, half of it, 25, 15 or 5 per cent, how much? Out of this amount, the companies have to pay royalty of 14 per cent, which some estimates put at 90,000 crore. The earning will then attract corporate tax. Even the price depends on grade of coal and net present value.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Asked about the demand for cancelling the allocations, he said: &amp;ldquo;No de-allocation will happen because of the CAG report or the Opposition&amp;rsquo;s ruckus.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Bills passed&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The government today passed the Chemical Weapons Convention (Amendment) Bill and the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (Amendment) Bill in the Lok Sabha by voice vote without discussion.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
		&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 31 August, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1120831/jsp/nation/story_15918809.jsp#.UEAWtqAXVwc&#039;,
		&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
		&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
		&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
		&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;centre-cites-sc-on-coal-16868&#039;,
		&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
		&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
		&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 16868,
		&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
		&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
		&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [[maximum depth reached]],
		&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;
	
	},
	&#039;articleid&#039; =&gt; (int) 16740,
	&#039;metaTitle&#039; =&gt; &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Centre cites SC on coal&#039;,
	&#039;metaKeywords&#039; =&gt; &#039;Comptroller and Auditor-General,CAG,Mining&#039;,
	&#039;metaDesc&#039; =&gt; &#039;
-The Telegraph

The government today dug out a 2006 verdict to argue that the Supreme Court was against auction of coal blocks as law minister Salman Khurshid questioned the presumptive revenue loss of Rs 1.86 lakh crore in the allocation of...&#039;,
	&#039;disp&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The government today dug out a 2006 verdict to argue that the Supreme Court was against auction of coal blocks as law minister Salman Khurshid questioned the presumptive revenue loss of Rs 1.86 lakh crore in the allocation of 57 blocks.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Congress spokesperson Manish Tewari, who addressed a joint media conference with Khurshid, read out the verdict that had nullified the NDA government&amp;rsquo;s plan for e-auction of coal blocks.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The verdict had said the central government and coal companies were expected to &amp;ldquo;harmonise the business potential of a country to benefit the common man&amp;rdquo;, and the state, while fixing the price for the purpose of equitable distribution or otherwise, &amp;ldquo;cannot be actuated purely by a profit motive&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;It should not discharge its functions in such a way as to aspire to earn huge profit especially at the cost of those who are fully dependent upon them for the supply of a monopoly item like coal. The methodology for allocation of coal to a bidder of e-auction is thus inequitable, irrational and fatuous. The scheme of e-auction, is therefore, ultra vires of the Constitution of India.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Khurshid said the government could not have ignored this view while formulating policies. He also referred to the presidential reference the government has moved in the Supreme Court on auction of valuable natural resources in the context of a 2G verdict that made auction of such resources mandatory.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Khurshid then proceeded to question the Rs 1.86 lakh crore figure in the CAG report, which said the loss resulted because of the allocation of the 57 blocks without competitive bidding.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;In the same paragraph where this amount is mentioned in the report, the CAG says a part of this financial gain could have been tapped by the government by taking timely decision on competitive bidding for allocation of coal blocks,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This means, he argued, even the CAG is not saying anybody caused a loss of Rs 1.86 lakh crore.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Khurshid said the CAG should have clarified what portion of this amount could the government have tapped. &amp;ldquo;Majority of it, half of it, 25, 15 or 5 per cent, how much? Out of this amount, the companies have to pay royalty of 14 per cent, which some estimates put at 90,000 crore. The earning will then attract corporate tax. Even the price depends on grade of coal and net present value.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Asked about the demand for cancelling the allocations, he said: &amp;ldquo;No de-allocation will happen because of the CAG report or the Opposition&amp;rsquo;s ruckus.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Bills passed&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The government today passed the Chemical Weapons Convention (Amendment) Bill and the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (Amendment) Bill in the Lok Sabha by voice vote without discussion.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;English&#039;,
	&#039;SITE_URL&#039; =&gt; &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;,
	&#039;site_title&#039; =&gt; &#039;im4change&#039;,
	&#039;adminprix&#039; =&gt; &#039;admin&#039;
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	&#039;id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16740,
	&#039;title&#039; =&gt; &#039;Centre cites SC on coal&#039;,
	&#039;subheading&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;description&#039; =&gt; &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;
-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The government today dug out a 2006 verdict to argue that the Supreme Court was against auction of coal blocks as law minister Salman Khurshid questioned the presumptive revenue loss of Rs 1.86 lakh crore in the allocation of 57 blocks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Congress spokesperson Manish Tewari, who addressed a joint media conference with Khurshid, read out the verdict that had nullified the NDA government&amp;rsquo;s plan for e-auction of coal blocks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The verdict had said the central government and coal companies were expected to &amp;ldquo;harmonise the business potential of a country to benefit the common man&amp;rdquo;, and the state, while fixing the price for the purpose of equitable distribution or otherwise, &amp;ldquo;cannot be actuated purely by a profit motive&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;It should not discharge its functions in such a way as to aspire to earn huge profit especially at the cost of those who are fully dependent upon them for the supply of a monopoly item like coal. The methodology for allocation of coal to a bidder of e-auction is thus inequitable, irrational and fatuous. The scheme of e-auction, is therefore, ultra vires of the Constitution of India.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Khurshid said the government could not have ignored this view while formulating policies. He also referred to the presidential reference the government has moved in the Supreme Court on auction of valuable natural resources in the context of a 2G verdict that made auction of such resources mandatory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Khurshid then proceeded to question the Rs 1.86 lakh crore figure in the CAG report, which said the loss resulted because of the allocation of the 57 blocks without competitive bidding.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;ldquo;In the same paragraph where this amount is mentioned in the report, the CAG says a part of this financial gain could have been tapped by the government by taking timely decision on competitive bidding for allocation of coal blocks,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This means, he argued, even the CAG is not saying anybody caused a loss of Rs 1.86 lakh crore.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Khurshid said the CAG should have clarified what portion of this amount could the government have tapped. &amp;ldquo;Majority of it, half of it, 25, 15 or 5 per cent, how much? Out of this amount, the companies have to pay royalty of 14 per cent, which some estimates put at 90,000 crore. The earning will then attract corporate tax. Even the price depends on grade of coal and net present value.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Asked about the demand for cancelling the allocations, he said: &amp;ldquo;No de-allocation will happen because of the CAG report or the Opposition&amp;rsquo;s ruckus.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Bills passed&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The government today passed the Chemical Weapons Convention (Amendment) Bill and the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (Amendment) Bill in the Lok Sabha by voice vote without discussion.
&lt;/div&gt;&#039;,
	&#039;credit_writer&#039; =&gt; &#039;The Telegraph, 31 August, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1120831/jsp/nation/story_15918809.jsp#.UEAWtqAXVwc&#039;,
	&#039;article_img&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;article_img_thumb&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;status&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;show_on_home&#039; =&gt; (int) 1,
	&#039;lang&#039; =&gt; &#039;EN&#039;,
	&#039;category_id&#039; =&gt; (int) 16,
	&#039;tag_keyword&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;seo_url&#039; =&gt; &#039;centre-cites-sc-on-coal-16868&#039;,
	&#039;meta_title&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_keywords&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;meta_description&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;noindex&#039; =&gt; (int) 0,
	&#039;publish_date&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	&#039;most_visit_section_id&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;article_big_img&#039; =&gt; null,
	&#039;liveid&#039; =&gt; (int) 16868,
	&#039;created&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;modified&#039; =&gt; object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	&#039;edate&#039; =&gt; &#039;&#039;,
	&#039;tags&#039; =&gt; [
		(int) 0 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 =&gt; object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	&#039;category&#039; =&gt; object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	&#039;[new]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[accessible]&#039; =&gt; [
		&#039;*&#039; =&gt; true,
		&#039;id&#039; =&gt; false
	],
	&#039;[dirty]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[original]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[virtual]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[hasErrors]&#039; =&gt; false,
	&#039;[errors]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[invalid]&#039; =&gt; [],
	&#039;[repository]&#039; =&gt; &#039;Articles&#039;

}
$articleid = (int) 16740
$metaTitle = &#039;LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Centre cites SC on coal&#039;
$metaKeywords = &#039;Comptroller and Auditor-General,CAG,Mining&#039;
$metaDesc = &#039;
-The Telegraph

The government today dug out a 2006 verdict to argue that the Supreme Court was against auction of coal blocks as law minister Salman Khurshid questioned the presumptive revenue loss of Rs 1.86 lakh crore in the allocation of...&#039;
$disp = &#039;&lt;div align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;-The Telegraph&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The government today dug out a 2006 verdict to argue that the Supreme Court was against auction of coal blocks as law minister Salman Khurshid questioned the presumptive revenue loss of Rs 1.86 lakh crore in the allocation of 57 blocks.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Congress spokesperson Manish Tewari, who addressed a joint media conference with Khurshid, read out the verdict that had nullified the NDA government&amp;rsquo;s plan for e-auction of coal blocks.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The verdict had said the central government and coal companies were expected to &amp;ldquo;harmonise the business potential of a country to benefit the common man&amp;rdquo;, and the state, while fixing the price for the purpose of equitable distribution or otherwise, &amp;ldquo;cannot be actuated purely by a profit motive&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;It should not discharge its functions in such a way as to aspire to earn huge profit especially at the cost of those who are fully dependent upon them for the supply of a monopoly item like coal. The methodology for allocation of coal to a bidder of e-auction is thus inequitable, irrational and fatuous. The scheme of e-auction, is therefore, ultra vires of the Constitution of India.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Khurshid said the government could not have ignored this view while formulating policies. He also referred to the presidential reference the government has moved in the Supreme Court on auction of valuable natural resources in the context of a 2G verdict that made auction of such resources mandatory.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Khurshid then proceeded to question the Rs 1.86 lakh crore figure in the CAG report, which said the loss resulted because of the allocation of the 57 blocks without competitive bidding.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;In the same paragraph where this amount is mentioned in the report, the CAG says a part of this financial gain could have been tapped by the government by taking timely decision on competitive bidding for allocation of coal blocks,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This means, he argued, even the CAG is not saying anybody caused a loss of Rs 1.86 lakh crore.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Khurshid said the CAG should have clarified what portion of this amount could the government have tapped. &amp;ldquo;Majority of it, half of it, 25, 15 or 5 per cent, how much? Out of this amount, the companies have to pay royalty of 14 per cent, which some estimates put at 90,000 crore. The earning will then attract corporate tax. Even the price depends on grade of coal and net present value.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Asked about the demand for cancelling the allocations, he said: &amp;ldquo;No de-allocation will happen because of the CAG report or the Opposition&amp;rsquo;s ruckus.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Bills passed&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The government today passed the Chemical Weapons Convention (Amendment) Bill and the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (Amendment) Bill in the Lok Sabha by voice vote without discussion.&lt;/div&gt;&#039;
$lang = &#039;English&#039;
$SITE_URL = &#039;https://im4change.in/&#039;
$site_title = &#039;im4change&#039;
$adminprix = &#039;admin&#039;</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/centre-cites-sc-on-coal-16868.html"/>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
    <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
          media="all"/>
    <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Centre cites SC on coal | Im4change.org</title>
    <meta name="description" content="
-The Telegraph

The government today dug out a 2006 verdict to argue that the Supreme Court was against auction of coal blocks as law minister Salman Khurshid questioned the presumptive revenue loss of Rs 1.86 lakh crore in the allocation of..."/>
    <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script>
    <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript">

        $(document).ready(function () {
            var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem
            var pic_real_width, pic_real_height;
            $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues
                .attr("src", $(img).attr("src"))
                .load(function () {
                    pic_real_width = this.width;   // Note: $(this).width() will not
                    pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images.
                });
        });
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        @media screen {
            div.divFooter {
                display: block;
            }
        }

        @media print {
            .printbutton {
                display: none !important;
            }
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center">
    <tr>
        <td class="top_bg">
            <div class="divFooter">
                <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0"
                     alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/>
            </div>

        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td id="topspace">&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr id="topspace">
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td width="100%">
            <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal">
                <strong>Centre cites SC on coal</strong></h1>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3">
                <div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br />The government today dug out a 2006 verdict to argue that the Supreme Court was against auction of coal blocks as law minister Salman Khurshid questioned the presumptive revenue loss of Rs 1.86 lakh crore in the allocation of 57 blocks.<br /><br />Congress spokesperson Manish Tewari, who addressed a joint media conference with Khurshid, read out the verdict that had nullified the NDA government&rsquo;s plan for e-auction of coal blocks.<br /><br />The verdict had said the central government and coal companies were expected to &ldquo;harmonise the business potential of a country to benefit the common man&rdquo;, and the state, while fixing the price for the purpose of equitable distribution or otherwise, &ldquo;cannot be actuated purely by a profit motive&rdquo;.<br /><br />&ldquo;It should not discharge its functions in such a way as to aspire to earn huge profit especially at the cost of those who are fully dependent upon them for the supply of a monopoly item like coal. The methodology for allocation of coal to a bidder of e-auction is thus inequitable, irrational and fatuous. The scheme of e-auction, is therefore, ultra vires of the Constitution of India.&rdquo;<br /><br />Khurshid said the government could not have ignored this view while formulating policies. He also referred to the presidential reference the government has moved in the Supreme Court on auction of valuable natural resources in the context of a 2G verdict that made auction of such resources mandatory.<br /><br />Khurshid then proceeded to question the Rs 1.86 lakh crore figure in the CAG report, which said the loss resulted because of the allocation of the 57 blocks without competitive bidding.<br /><br />&ldquo;In the same paragraph where this amount is mentioned in the report, the CAG says a part of this financial gain could have been tapped by the government by taking timely decision on competitive bidding for allocation of coal blocks,&rdquo; he said.<br /><br />This means, he argued, even the CAG is not saying anybody caused a loss of Rs 1.86 lakh crore.<br /><br />Khurshid said the CAG should have clarified what portion of this amount could the government have tapped. &ldquo;Majority of it, half of it, 25, 15 or 5 per cent, how much? Out of this amount, the companies have to pay royalty of 14 per cent, which some estimates put at 90,000 crore. The earning will then attract corporate tax. Even the price depends on grade of coal and net present value.&rdquo;<br /><br />Asked about the demand for cancelling the allocations, he said: &ldquo;No de-allocation will happen because of the CAG report or the Opposition&rsquo;s ruckus.&rdquo;<br /><em><br />Bills passed</em><br /><br />The government today passed the Chemical Weapons Convention (Amendment) Bill and the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (Amendment) Bill in the Lok Sabha by voice vote without discussion.</div>               </font>
        </td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>&nbsp;</td>
    </tr>

    <tr>
        <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;">
            <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page "
                         onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form>
        </td>
    </tr>
</table></body>
</html>'

}
$cookies = []
$values = [
	(int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
]
$name = 'Content-Type'
$first = true
$value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'
header - [internal], line ??
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181
Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55
Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141
[main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39

<head>

    <link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>

    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>

$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp'
$dataForView = [
	'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

		'id' => (int) 16740,
		'title' => 'Centre cites SC on coal',
		'subheading' => '',
		'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Telegraph<br />
<br />
The government today dug out a 2006 verdict to argue that the Supreme Court was against auction of coal blocks as law minister Salman Khurshid questioned the presumptive revenue loss of Rs 1.86 lakh crore in the allocation of 57 blocks.<br />
<br />
Congress spokesperson Manish Tewari, who addressed a joint media conference with Khurshid, read out the verdict that had nullified the NDA government&rsquo;s plan for e-auction of coal blocks.<br />
<br />
The verdict had said the central government and coal companies were expected to &ldquo;harmonise the business potential of a country to benefit the common man&rdquo;, and the state, while fixing the price for the purpose of equitable distribution or otherwise, &ldquo;cannot be actuated purely by a profit motive&rdquo;.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;It should not discharge its functions in such a way as to aspire to earn huge profit especially at the cost of those who are fully dependent upon them for the supply of a monopoly item like coal. The methodology for allocation of coal to a bidder of e-auction is thus inequitable, irrational and fatuous. The scheme of e-auction, is therefore, ultra vires of the Constitution of India.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
Khurshid said the government could not have ignored this view while formulating policies. He also referred to the presidential reference the government has moved in the Supreme Court on auction of valuable natural resources in the context of a 2G verdict that made auction of such resources mandatory.<br />
<br />
Khurshid then proceeded to question the Rs 1.86 lakh crore figure in the CAG report, which said the loss resulted because of the allocation of the 57 blocks without competitive bidding.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;In the same paragraph where this amount is mentioned in the report, the CAG says a part of this financial gain could have been tapped by the government by taking timely decision on competitive bidding for allocation of coal blocks,&rdquo; he said.<br />
<br />
This means, he argued, even the CAG is not saying anybody caused a loss of Rs 1.86 lakh crore.<br />
<br />
Khurshid said the CAG should have clarified what portion of this amount could the government have tapped. &ldquo;Majority of it, half of it, 25, 15 or 5 per cent, how much? Out of this amount, the companies have to pay royalty of 14 per cent, which some estimates put at 90,000 crore. The earning will then attract corporate tax. Even the price depends on grade of coal and net present value.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
Asked about the demand for cancelling the allocations, he said: &ldquo;No de-allocation will happen because of the CAG report or the Opposition&rsquo;s ruckus.&rdquo;<br />
<em><br />
Bills passed</em><br />
<br />
The government today passed the Chemical Weapons Convention (Amendment) Bill and the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (Amendment) Bill in the Lok Sabha by voice vote without discussion.
</div>',
		'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 31 August, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1120831/jsp/nation/story_15918809.jsp#.UEAWtqAXVwc',
		'article_img' => '',
		'article_img_thumb' => '',
		'status' => (int) 1,
		'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
		'lang' => 'EN',
		'category_id' => (int) 16,
		'tag_keyword' => '',
		'seo_url' => 'centre-cites-sc-on-coal-16868',
		'meta_title' => null,
		'meta_keywords' => null,
		'meta_description' => null,
		'noindex' => (int) 0,
		'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
		'most_visit_section_id' => null,
		'article_big_img' => null,
		'liveid' => (int) 16868,
		'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
		'edate' => '',
		'tags' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
		'[new]' => false,
		'[accessible]' => [
			[maximum depth reached]
		],
		'[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[hasErrors]' => false,
		'[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]],
		'[repository]' => 'Articles'
	
	},
	'articleid' => (int) 16740,
	'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Centre cites SC on coal',
	'metaKeywords' => 'Comptroller and Auditor-General,CAG,Mining',
	'metaDesc' => '
-The Telegraph

The government today dug out a 2006 verdict to argue that the Supreme Court was against auction of coal blocks as law minister Salman Khurshid questioned the presumptive revenue loss of Rs 1.86 lakh crore in the allocation of...',
	'disp' => '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br />The government today dug out a 2006 verdict to argue that the Supreme Court was against auction of coal blocks as law minister Salman Khurshid questioned the presumptive revenue loss of Rs 1.86 lakh crore in the allocation of 57 blocks.<br /><br />Congress spokesperson Manish Tewari, who addressed a joint media conference with Khurshid, read out the verdict that had nullified the NDA government&rsquo;s plan for e-auction of coal blocks.<br /><br />The verdict had said the central government and coal companies were expected to &ldquo;harmonise the business potential of a country to benefit the common man&rdquo;, and the state, while fixing the price for the purpose of equitable distribution or otherwise, &ldquo;cannot be actuated purely by a profit motive&rdquo;.<br /><br />&ldquo;It should not discharge its functions in such a way as to aspire to earn huge profit especially at the cost of those who are fully dependent upon them for the supply of a monopoly item like coal. The methodology for allocation of coal to a bidder of e-auction is thus inequitable, irrational and fatuous. The scheme of e-auction, is therefore, ultra vires of the Constitution of India.&rdquo;<br /><br />Khurshid said the government could not have ignored this view while formulating policies. He also referred to the presidential reference the government has moved in the Supreme Court on auction of valuable natural resources in the context of a 2G verdict that made auction of such resources mandatory.<br /><br />Khurshid then proceeded to question the Rs 1.86 lakh crore figure in the CAG report, which said the loss resulted because of the allocation of the 57 blocks without competitive bidding.<br /><br />&ldquo;In the same paragraph where this amount is mentioned in the report, the CAG says a part of this financial gain could have been tapped by the government by taking timely decision on competitive bidding for allocation of coal blocks,&rdquo; he said.<br /><br />This means, he argued, even the CAG is not saying anybody caused a loss of Rs 1.86 lakh crore.<br /><br />Khurshid said the CAG should have clarified what portion of this amount could the government have tapped. &ldquo;Majority of it, half of it, 25, 15 or 5 per cent, how much? Out of this amount, the companies have to pay royalty of 14 per cent, which some estimates put at 90,000 crore. The earning will then attract corporate tax. Even the price depends on grade of coal and net present value.&rdquo;<br /><br />Asked about the demand for cancelling the allocations, he said: &ldquo;No de-allocation will happen because of the CAG report or the Opposition&rsquo;s ruckus.&rdquo;<br /><em><br />Bills passed</em><br /><br />The government today passed the Chemical Weapons Convention (Amendment) Bill and the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (Amendment) Bill in the Lok Sabha by voice vote without discussion.</div>',
	'lang' => 'English',
	'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/',
	'site_title' => 'im4change',
	'adminprix' => 'admin'
]
$article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) {

	'id' => (int) 16740,
	'title' => 'Centre cites SC on coal',
	'subheading' => '',
	'description' => '<div align="justify">
-The Telegraph<br />
<br />
The government today dug out a 2006 verdict to argue that the Supreme Court was against auction of coal blocks as law minister Salman Khurshid questioned the presumptive revenue loss of Rs 1.86 lakh crore in the allocation of 57 blocks.<br />
<br />
Congress spokesperson Manish Tewari, who addressed a joint media conference with Khurshid, read out the verdict that had nullified the NDA government&rsquo;s plan for e-auction of coal blocks.<br />
<br />
The verdict had said the central government and coal companies were expected to &ldquo;harmonise the business potential of a country to benefit the common man&rdquo;, and the state, while fixing the price for the purpose of equitable distribution or otherwise, &ldquo;cannot be actuated purely by a profit motive&rdquo;.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;It should not discharge its functions in such a way as to aspire to earn huge profit especially at the cost of those who are fully dependent upon them for the supply of a monopoly item like coal. The methodology for allocation of coal to a bidder of e-auction is thus inequitable, irrational and fatuous. The scheme of e-auction, is therefore, ultra vires of the Constitution of India.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
Khurshid said the government could not have ignored this view while formulating policies. He also referred to the presidential reference the government has moved in the Supreme Court on auction of valuable natural resources in the context of a 2G verdict that made auction of such resources mandatory.<br />
<br />
Khurshid then proceeded to question the Rs 1.86 lakh crore figure in the CAG report, which said the loss resulted because of the allocation of the 57 blocks without competitive bidding.<br />
<br />
&ldquo;In the same paragraph where this amount is mentioned in the report, the CAG says a part of this financial gain could have been tapped by the government by taking timely decision on competitive bidding for allocation of coal blocks,&rdquo; he said.<br />
<br />
This means, he argued, even the CAG is not saying anybody caused a loss of Rs 1.86 lakh crore.<br />
<br />
Khurshid said the CAG should have clarified what portion of this amount could the government have tapped. &ldquo;Majority of it, half of it, 25, 15 or 5 per cent, how much? Out of this amount, the companies have to pay royalty of 14 per cent, which some estimates put at 90,000 crore. The earning will then attract corporate tax. Even the price depends on grade of coal and net present value.&rdquo;<br />
<br />
Asked about the demand for cancelling the allocations, he said: &ldquo;No de-allocation will happen because of the CAG report or the Opposition&rsquo;s ruckus.&rdquo;<br />
<em><br />
Bills passed</em><br />
<br />
The government today passed the Chemical Weapons Convention (Amendment) Bill and the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (Amendment) Bill in the Lok Sabha by voice vote without discussion.
</div>',
	'credit_writer' => 'The Telegraph, 31 August, 2012, http://www.telegraphindia.com/1120831/jsp/nation/story_15918809.jsp#.UEAWtqAXVwc',
	'article_img' => '',
	'article_img_thumb' => '',
	'status' => (int) 1,
	'show_on_home' => (int) 1,
	'lang' => 'EN',
	'category_id' => (int) 16,
	'tag_keyword' => '',
	'seo_url' => 'centre-cites-sc-on-coal-16868',
	'meta_title' => null,
	'meta_keywords' => null,
	'meta_description' => null,
	'noindex' => (int) 0,
	'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {},
	'most_visit_section_id' => null,
	'article_big_img' => null,
	'liveid' => (int) 16868,
	'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {},
	'edate' => '',
	'tags' => [
		(int) 0 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 1 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {},
		(int) 2 => object(Cake\ORM\Entity) {}
	],
	'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {},
	'[new]' => false,
	'[accessible]' => [
		'*' => true,
		'id' => false
	],
	'[dirty]' => [],
	'[original]' => [],
	'[virtual]' => [],
	'[hasErrors]' => false,
	'[errors]' => [],
	'[invalid]' => [],
	'[repository]' => 'Articles'

}
$articleid = (int) 16740
$metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Centre cites SC on coal'
$metaKeywords = 'Comptroller and Auditor-General,CAG,Mining'
$metaDesc = '
-The Telegraph

The government today dug out a 2006 verdict to argue that the Supreme Court was against auction of coal blocks as law minister Salman Khurshid questioned the presumptive revenue loss of Rs 1.86 lakh crore in the allocation of...'
$disp = '<div align="justify">-The Telegraph<br /><br />The government today dug out a 2006 verdict to argue that the Supreme Court was against auction of coal blocks as law minister Salman Khurshid questioned the presumptive revenue loss of Rs 1.86 lakh crore in the allocation of 57 blocks.<br /><br />Congress spokesperson Manish Tewari, who addressed a joint media conference with Khurshid, read out the verdict that had nullified the NDA government&rsquo;s plan for e-auction of coal blocks.<br /><br />The verdict had said the central government and coal companies were expected to &ldquo;harmonise the business potential of a country to benefit the common man&rdquo;, and the state, while fixing the price for the purpose of equitable distribution or otherwise, &ldquo;cannot be actuated purely by a profit motive&rdquo;.<br /><br />&ldquo;It should not discharge its functions in such a way as to aspire to earn huge profit especially at the cost of those who are fully dependent upon them for the supply of a monopoly item like coal. The methodology for allocation of coal to a bidder of e-auction is thus inequitable, irrational and fatuous. The scheme of e-auction, is therefore, ultra vires of the Constitution of India.&rdquo;<br /><br />Khurshid said the government could not have ignored this view while formulating policies. He also referred to the presidential reference the government has moved in the Supreme Court on auction of valuable natural resources in the context of a 2G verdict that made auction of such resources mandatory.<br /><br />Khurshid then proceeded to question the Rs 1.86 lakh crore figure in the CAG report, which said the loss resulted because of the allocation of the 57 blocks without competitive bidding.<br /><br />&ldquo;In the same paragraph where this amount is mentioned in the report, the CAG says a part of this financial gain could have been tapped by the government by taking timely decision on competitive bidding for allocation of coal blocks,&rdquo; he said.<br /><br />This means, he argued, even the CAG is not saying anybody caused a loss of Rs 1.86 lakh crore.<br /><br />Khurshid said the CAG should have clarified what portion of this amount could the government have tapped. &ldquo;Majority of it, half of it, 25, 15 or 5 per cent, how much? Out of this amount, the companies have to pay royalty of 14 per cent, which some estimates put at 90,000 crore. The earning will then attract corporate tax. Even the price depends on grade of coal and net present value.&rdquo;<br /><br />Asked about the demand for cancelling the allocations, he said: &ldquo;No de-allocation will happen because of the CAG report or the Opposition&rsquo;s ruckus.&rdquo;<br /><em><br />Bills passed</em><br /><br />The government today passed the Chemical Weapons Convention (Amendment) Bill and the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (Amendment) Bill in the Lok Sabha by voice vote without discussion.</div>'
$lang = 'English'
$SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/'
$site_title = 'im4change'
$adminprix = 'admin'

include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8
Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413
Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374
Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927
Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885
Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126
Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94
Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96
Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65
Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51

Centre cites SC on coal

-The Telegraph The government today dug out a 2006 verdict to argue that the Supreme Court was against auction of coal blocks as law minister Salman Khurshid questioned the presumptive revenue loss of Rs 1.86 lakh crore in the allocation of 57 blocks. Congress spokesperson Manish Tewari, who addressed a joint media conference with Khurshid, read out the verdict that had nullified the NDA government’s plan for e-auction of coal blocks. The verdict had said the central government and coal companies were expected to “harmonise the business potential of a country to benefit the common man”, and the state, while fixing the price for the purpose of equitable distribution or otherwise, “cannot be actuated purely by a profit motive”. “It should not discharge its functions in such a way as to aspire to earn huge profit especially at the cost of those who are fully dependent upon them for the supply of a monopoly item like coal. The methodology for allocation of coal to a bidder of e-auction is thus inequitable, irrational and fatuous. The scheme of e-auction, is therefore, ultra vires of the Constitution of India.” Khurshid said the government could not have ignored this view while formulating policies. He also referred to the presidential reference the government has moved in the Supreme Court on auction of valuable natural resources in the context of a 2G verdict that made auction of such resources mandatory. Khurshid then proceeded to question the Rs 1.86 lakh crore figure in the CAG report, which said the loss resulted because of the allocation of the 57 blocks without competitive bidding. “In the same paragraph where this amount is mentioned in the report, the CAG says a part of this financial gain could have been tapped by the government by taking timely decision on competitive bidding for allocation of coal blocks,” he said. This means, he argued, even the CAG is not saying anybody caused a loss of Rs 1.86 lakh crore. Khurshid said the CAG should have clarified what portion of this amount could the government have tapped. “Majority of it, half of it, 25, 15 or 5 per cent, how much? Out of this amount, the companies have to pay royalty of 14 per cent, which some estimates put at 90,000 crore. The earning will then attract corporate tax. Even the price depends on grade of coal and net present value.” Asked about the demand for cancelling the allocations, he said: “No de-allocation will happen because of the CAG report or the Opposition’s ruckus.” Bills passed The government today passed the Chemical Weapons Convention (Amendment) Bill and the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (Amendment) Bill in the Lok Sabha by voice vote without discussion.