Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 73 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 73, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/centre-states-to-share-rte-expenses-in-6832-ratio-2720/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/centre-states-to-share-rte-expenses-in-6832-ratio-2720/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'catslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 73 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Deprecated (16384): The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php. [CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311]Code Context
trigger_error($message, E_USER_DEPRECATED);
}
$message = 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead. - /home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line: 74 You can disable deprecation warnings by setting `Error.errorLevel` to `E_ALL & ~E_USER_DEPRECATED` in your config/app.php.' $stackFrame = (int) 1 $trace = [ (int) 0 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ServerRequest.php', 'line' => (int) 2421, 'function' => 'deprecationWarning', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'The ArrayAccess methods will be removed in 4.0.0.Use getParam(), getData() and getQuery() instead.' ] ], (int) 1 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ], (int) 2 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Controller/Controller.php', 'line' => (int) 610, 'function' => 'printArticle', 'class' => 'App\Controller\ArtileDetailController', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 3 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 120, 'function' => 'invokeAction', 'class' => 'Cake\Controller\Controller', 'object' => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ], (int) 4 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php', 'line' => (int) 94, 'function' => '_invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(App\Controller\ArtileDetailController) {} ] ], (int) 5 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/BaseApplication.php', 'line' => (int) 235, 'function' => 'dispatch', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 6 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\BaseApplication', 'object' => object(App\Application) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 7 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 162, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 8 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 9 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 88, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 10 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 11 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php', 'line' => (int) 96, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 12 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 65, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware', 'object' => object(Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {} ] ], (int) 13 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Runner.php', 'line' => (int) 51, 'function' => '__invoke', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 14 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Http/Server.php', 'line' => (int) 98, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Runner', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Runner) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => object(Cake\Http\MiddlewareQueue) {}, (int) 1 => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) {}, (int) 2 => object(Cake\Http\Response) {} ] ], (int) 15 => [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/webroot/index.php', 'line' => (int) 39, 'function' => 'run', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\Server', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\Server) {}, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [] ] ] $frame = [ 'file' => '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php', 'line' => (int) 74, 'function' => 'offsetGet', 'class' => 'Cake\Http\ServerRequest', 'object' => object(Cake\Http\ServerRequest) { trustProxy => false [protected] params => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] data => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] query => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] cookies => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _environment => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] url => 'latest-news-updates/centre-states-to-share-rte-expenses-in-6832-ratio-2720/print' [protected] base => '' [protected] webroot => '/' [protected] here => '/latest-news-updates/centre-states-to-share-rte-expenses-in-6832-ratio-2720/print' [protected] trustedProxies => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] _input => null [protected] _detectors => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] _detectorCache => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] stream => object(Zend\Diactoros\PhpInputStream) {} [protected] uri => object(Zend\Diactoros\Uri) {} [protected] session => object(Cake\Http\Session) {} [protected] attributes => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] emulatedAttributes => [ [maximum depth reached] ] [protected] uploadedFiles => [[maximum depth reached]] [protected] protocol => null [protected] requestTarget => null [private] deprecatedProperties => [ [maximum depth reached] ] }, 'type' => '->', 'args' => [ (int) 0 => 'artileslug' ] ]deprecationWarning - CORE/src/Core/functions.php, line 311 Cake\Http\ServerRequest::offsetGet() - CORE/src/Http/ServerRequest.php, line 2421 App\Controller\ArtileDetailController::printArticle() - APP/Controller/ArtileDetailController.php, line 74 Cake\Controller\Controller::invokeAction() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 610 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 120 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51 Cake\Http\Server::run() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 98
Warning (512): Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853 [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48]Code Contextif (Configure::read('debug')) {
trigger_error($message, E_USER_WARNING);
} else {
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68109c35cc273-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68109c35cc273-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68109c35cc273-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68109c35cc273-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68109c35cc273-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68109c35cc273-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68109c35cc273-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68109c35cc273-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68109c35cc273-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 2635, 'title' => 'Centre, states to share RTE expenses in 68:32 ratio', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Underpressure from the states, the central government has agreed to bear a higher burden of the cost of implementing the Right to Education. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Centre&rsquo;s share of the financial burden will be at 68%, a sharp rise from the sharing pattern of 55:45 in the current year and the proposed 50:50 from 2011-12 . </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The new sharing pattern has been approved by the Expenditure Finance Committee on Wednesday. The ministry of human resource development had been pushing for a higher share, 75%, for the Centre as state after state expressed their inability to set aside higher level of funding required to meet the stringent norms of the RTE. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">States argued that the RTE made state and local bodies accountable for the implementation, even though neither has the financial capacity. Some states like Uttar Pradesh charged that since the central government takes all the credit for the legislation it should also ensure that funds are available. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Bordia Committee set up by the ministry in 2009-10 to harmonise the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan and the RTE also argued for a higher financial burden for the centre. It said that sharing ratio of 55:45 (for the current year) and 50:50 (in 2011-12 ) would be unfavourable to the states as they would have to practically double their allocation. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The committee found that at even at 2009-10 sharing levels of 60:40 for the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan as many as 14 states defaulted on their shares. Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, Rajasthan, Chattisgarh, Himachal Pradesh, Orissa are among the defaulters. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In the meantime, the cost of implementing the RTE had escalated to 2,31,000 crore from the initial estimate of 1,71,000 crore. This meant that in absolute terms, states would have to shoulder a bigger financial burden than previously estimated. A higher share for the centre was however opposed by the Planning Commission. The issue was resolved after HRD minister Kapil Sibal met with finance minister Pranab Mukherjee last weekend. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Expenditure Finance Committee approved the outlay of 2,31,000 crore as well. This includes the 24,000 crore allocated to the states by the thirteenth Finance Commission. This would make the total amount that the centre and states require to allocate for the implementation of the RTE is to the tune of 2,07,000 crore over the next five years. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The central government&rsquo;s share of this amount will be at 65% and that of the states 35%. However, when the 24,000 crore awarded by the Finance Commission is taken into account, the centre&rsquo;s share effectively works out to 68% while that of the states&rsquo; 32%.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 30 July, 2010, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/policy/Centre-states-to-share-RTE-expenses-in-6832-ratio/articleshow/6235330.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'centre-states-to-share-rte-expenses-in-6832-ratio-2720', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 2720, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [[maximum depth reached]], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 2635, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Centre, states to share RTE expenses in 68:32 ratio', 'metaKeywords' => null, 'metaDesc' => ' Underpressure from the states, the central government has agreed to bear a higher burden of the cost of implementing the Right to Education. The Centre&rsquo;s share of the financial burden will be at 68%, a sharp rise from the sharing...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><font >Underpressure from the states, the central government has agreed to bear a higher burden of the cost of implementing the Right to Education. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Centre&rsquo;s share of the financial burden will be at 68%, a sharp rise from the sharing pattern of 55:45 in the current year and the proposed 50:50 from 2011-12 . </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The new sharing pattern has been approved by the Expenditure Finance Committee on Wednesday. The ministry of human resource development had been pushing for a higher share, 75%, for the Centre as state after state expressed their inability to set aside higher level of funding required to meet the stringent norms of the RTE. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >States argued that the RTE made state and local bodies accountable for the implementation, even though neither has the financial capacity. Some states like Uttar Pradesh charged that since the central government takes all the credit for the legislation it should also ensure that funds are available. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Bordia Committee set up by the ministry in 2009-10 to harmonise the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan and the RTE also argued for a higher financial burden for the centre. It said that sharing ratio of 55:45 (for the current year) and 50:50 (in 2011-12 ) would be unfavourable to the states as they would have to practically double their allocation. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The committee found that at even at 2009-10 sharing levels of 60:40 for the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan as many as 14 states defaulted on their shares. Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, Rajasthan, Chattisgarh, Himachal Pradesh, Orissa are among the defaulters. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >In the meantime, the cost of implementing the RTE had escalated to 2,31,000 crore from the initial estimate of 1,71,000 crore. This meant that in absolute terms, states would have to shoulder a bigger financial burden than previously estimated. A higher share for the centre was however opposed by the Planning Commission. The issue was resolved after HRD minister Kapil Sibal met with finance minister Pranab Mukherjee last weekend. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Expenditure Finance Committee approved the outlay of 2,31,000 crore as well. This includes the 24,000 crore allocated to the states by the thirteenth Finance Commission. This would make the total amount that the centre and states require to allocate for the implementation of the RTE is to the tune of 2,07,000 crore over the next five years. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The central government&rsquo;s share of this amount will be at 65% and that of the states 35%. However, when the 24,000 crore awarded by the Finance Commission is taken into account, the centre&rsquo;s share effectively works out to 68% while that of the states&rsquo; 32%.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 2635, 'title' => 'Centre, states to share RTE expenses in 68:32 ratio', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Underpressure from the states, the central government has agreed to bear a higher burden of the cost of implementing the Right to Education. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Centre&rsquo;s share of the financial burden will be at 68%, a sharp rise from the sharing pattern of 55:45 in the current year and the proposed 50:50 from 2011-12 . </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The new sharing pattern has been approved by the Expenditure Finance Committee on Wednesday. The ministry of human resource development had been pushing for a higher share, 75%, for the Centre as state after state expressed their inability to set aside higher level of funding required to meet the stringent norms of the RTE. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">States argued that the RTE made state and local bodies accountable for the implementation, even though neither has the financial capacity. Some states like Uttar Pradesh charged that since the central government takes all the credit for the legislation it should also ensure that funds are available. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Bordia Committee set up by the ministry in 2009-10 to harmonise the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan and the RTE also argued for a higher financial burden for the centre. It said that sharing ratio of 55:45 (for the current year) and 50:50 (in 2011-12 ) would be unfavourable to the states as they would have to practically double their allocation. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The committee found that at even at 2009-10 sharing levels of 60:40 for the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan as many as 14 states defaulted on their shares. Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, Rajasthan, Chattisgarh, Himachal Pradesh, Orissa are among the defaulters. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In the meantime, the cost of implementing the RTE had escalated to 2,31,000 crore from the initial estimate of 1,71,000 crore. This meant that in absolute terms, states would have to shoulder a bigger financial burden than previously estimated. A higher share for the centre was however opposed by the Planning Commission. The issue was resolved after HRD minister Kapil Sibal met with finance minister Pranab Mukherjee last weekend. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Expenditure Finance Committee approved the outlay of 2,31,000 crore as well. This includes the 24,000 crore allocated to the states by the thirteenth Finance Commission. This would make the total amount that the centre and states require to allocate for the implementation of the RTE is to the tune of 2,07,000 crore over the next five years. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The central government&rsquo;s share of this amount will be at 65% and that of the states 35%. However, when the 24,000 crore awarded by the Finance Commission is taken into account, the centre&rsquo;s share effectively works out to 68% while that of the states&rsquo; 32%.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 30 July, 2010, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/policy/Centre-states-to-share-RTE-expenses-in-6832-ratio/articleshow/6235330.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'centre-states-to-share-rte-expenses-in-6832-ratio-2720', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 2720, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 2635 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Centre, states to share RTE expenses in 68:32 ratio' $metaKeywords = null $metaDesc = ' Underpressure from the states, the central government has agreed to bear a higher burden of the cost of implementing the Right to Education. The Centre&rsquo;s share of the financial burden will be at 68%, a sharp rise from the sharing...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><font >Underpressure from the states, the central government has agreed to bear a higher burden of the cost of implementing the Right to Education. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Centre&rsquo;s share of the financial burden will be at 68%, a sharp rise from the sharing pattern of 55:45 in the current year and the proposed 50:50 from 2011-12 . </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The new sharing pattern has been approved by the Expenditure Finance Committee on Wednesday. The ministry of human resource development had been pushing for a higher share, 75%, for the Centre as state after state expressed their inability to set aside higher level of funding required to meet the stringent norms of the RTE. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >States argued that the RTE made state and local bodies accountable for the implementation, even though neither has the financial capacity. Some states like Uttar Pradesh charged that since the central government takes all the credit for the legislation it should also ensure that funds are available. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Bordia Committee set up by the ministry in 2009-10 to harmonise the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan and the RTE also argued for a higher financial burden for the centre. It said that sharing ratio of 55:45 (for the current year) and 50:50 (in 2011-12 ) would be unfavourable to the states as they would have to practically double their allocation. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The committee found that at even at 2009-10 sharing levels of 60:40 for the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan as many as 14 states defaulted on their shares. Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, Rajasthan, Chattisgarh, Himachal Pradesh, Orissa are among the defaulters. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >In the meantime, the cost of implementing the RTE had escalated to 2,31,000 crore from the initial estimate of 1,71,000 crore. This meant that in absolute terms, states would have to shoulder a bigger financial burden than previously estimated. A higher share for the centre was however opposed by the Planning Commission. The issue was resolved after HRD minister Kapil Sibal met with finance minister Pranab Mukherjee last weekend. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Expenditure Finance Committee approved the outlay of 2,31,000 crore as well. This includes the 24,000 crore allocated to the states by the thirteenth Finance Commission. This would make the total amount that the centre and states require to allocate for the implementation of the RTE is to the tune of 2,07,000 crore over the next five years. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The central government&rsquo;s share of this amount will be at 65% and that of the states 35%. However, when the 24,000 crore awarded by the Finance Commission is taken into account, the centre&rsquo;s share effectively works out to 68% while that of the states&rsquo; 32%.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/centre-states-to-share-rte-expenses-in-6832-ratio-2720.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Centre, states to share RTE expenses in 68:32 ratio | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" Underpressure from the states, the central government has agreed to bear a higher burden of the cost of implementing the Right to Education. The Centre’s share of the financial burden will be at 68%, a sharp rise from the sharing..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Centre, states to share RTE expenses in 68:32 ratio</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><font >Underpressure from the states, the central government has agreed to bear a higher burden of the cost of implementing the Right to Education. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Centre’s share of the financial burden will be at 68%, a sharp rise from the sharing pattern of 55:45 in the current year and the proposed 50:50 from 2011-12 . </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The new sharing pattern has been approved by the Expenditure Finance Committee on Wednesday. The ministry of human resource development had been pushing for a higher share, 75%, for the Centre as state after state expressed their inability to set aside higher level of funding required to meet the stringent norms of the RTE. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >States argued that the RTE made state and local bodies accountable for the implementation, even though neither has the financial capacity. Some states like Uttar Pradesh charged that since the central government takes all the credit for the legislation it should also ensure that funds are available. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Bordia Committee set up by the ministry in 2009-10 to harmonise the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan and the RTE also argued for a higher financial burden for the centre. It said that sharing ratio of 55:45 (for the current year) and 50:50 (in 2011-12 ) would be unfavourable to the states as they would have to practically double their allocation. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The committee found that at even at 2009-10 sharing levels of 60:40 for the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan as many as 14 states defaulted on their shares. Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, Rajasthan, Chattisgarh, Himachal Pradesh, Orissa are among the defaulters. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >In the meantime, the cost of implementing the RTE had escalated to 2,31,000 crore from the initial estimate of 1,71,000 crore. This meant that in absolute terms, states would have to shoulder a bigger financial burden than previously estimated. A higher share for the centre was however opposed by the Planning Commission. The issue was resolved after HRD minister Kapil Sibal met with finance minister Pranab Mukherjee last weekend. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Expenditure Finance Committee approved the outlay of 2,31,000 crore as well. This includes the 24,000 crore allocated to the states by the thirteenth Finance Commission. This would make the total amount that the centre and states require to allocate for the implementation of the RTE is to the tune of 2,07,000 crore over the next five years. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The central government’s share of this amount will be at 65% and that of the states 35%. However, when the 24,000 crore awarded by the Finance Commission is taken into account, the centre’s share effectively works out to 68% while that of the states’ 32%.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $maxBufferLength = (int) 8192 $file = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php' $line = (int) 853 $message = 'Unable to emit headers. Headers sent in file=/home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php line=853'Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 48 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148]Code Context$response->getStatusCode(),
($reasonPhrase ? ' ' . $reasonPhrase : '')
));
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68109c35cc273-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68109c35cc273-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68109c35cc273-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68109c35cc273-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68109c35cc273-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68109c35cc273-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68109c35cc273-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68109c35cc273-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68109c35cc273-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 2635, 'title' => 'Centre, states to share RTE expenses in 68:32 ratio', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Underpressure from the states, the central government has agreed to bear a higher burden of the cost of implementing the Right to Education. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Centre&rsquo;s share of the financial burden will be at 68%, a sharp rise from the sharing pattern of 55:45 in the current year and the proposed 50:50 from 2011-12 . </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The new sharing pattern has been approved by the Expenditure Finance Committee on Wednesday. The ministry of human resource development had been pushing for a higher share, 75%, for the Centre as state after state expressed their inability to set aside higher level of funding required to meet the stringent norms of the RTE. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">States argued that the RTE made state and local bodies accountable for the implementation, even though neither has the financial capacity. Some states like Uttar Pradesh charged that since the central government takes all the credit for the legislation it should also ensure that funds are available. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Bordia Committee set up by the ministry in 2009-10 to harmonise the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan and the RTE also argued for a higher financial burden for the centre. It said that sharing ratio of 55:45 (for the current year) and 50:50 (in 2011-12 ) would be unfavourable to the states as they would have to practically double their allocation. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The committee found that at even at 2009-10 sharing levels of 60:40 for the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan as many as 14 states defaulted on their shares. Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, Rajasthan, Chattisgarh, Himachal Pradesh, Orissa are among the defaulters. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In the meantime, the cost of implementing the RTE had escalated to 2,31,000 crore from the initial estimate of 1,71,000 crore. This meant that in absolute terms, states would have to shoulder a bigger financial burden than previously estimated. A higher share for the centre was however opposed by the Planning Commission. The issue was resolved after HRD minister Kapil Sibal met with finance minister Pranab Mukherjee last weekend. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Expenditure Finance Committee approved the outlay of 2,31,000 crore as well. This includes the 24,000 crore allocated to the states by the thirteenth Finance Commission. This would make the total amount that the centre and states require to allocate for the implementation of the RTE is to the tune of 2,07,000 crore over the next five years. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The central government&rsquo;s share of this amount will be at 65% and that of the states 35%. However, when the 24,000 crore awarded by the Finance Commission is taken into account, the centre&rsquo;s share effectively works out to 68% while that of the states&rsquo; 32%.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 30 July, 2010, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/policy/Centre-states-to-share-RTE-expenses-in-6832-ratio/articleshow/6235330.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'centre-states-to-share-rte-expenses-in-6832-ratio-2720', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 2720, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [[maximum depth reached]], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 2635, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Centre, states to share RTE expenses in 68:32 ratio', 'metaKeywords' => null, 'metaDesc' => ' Underpressure from the states, the central government has agreed to bear a higher burden of the cost of implementing the Right to Education. The Centre&rsquo;s share of the financial burden will be at 68%, a sharp rise from the sharing...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><font >Underpressure from the states, the central government has agreed to bear a higher burden of the cost of implementing the Right to Education. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Centre&rsquo;s share of the financial burden will be at 68%, a sharp rise from the sharing pattern of 55:45 in the current year and the proposed 50:50 from 2011-12 . </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The new sharing pattern has been approved by the Expenditure Finance Committee on Wednesday. The ministry of human resource development had been pushing for a higher share, 75%, for the Centre as state after state expressed their inability to set aside higher level of funding required to meet the stringent norms of the RTE. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >States argued that the RTE made state and local bodies accountable for the implementation, even though neither has the financial capacity. Some states like Uttar Pradesh charged that since the central government takes all the credit for the legislation it should also ensure that funds are available. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Bordia Committee set up by the ministry in 2009-10 to harmonise the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan and the RTE also argued for a higher financial burden for the centre. It said that sharing ratio of 55:45 (for the current year) and 50:50 (in 2011-12 ) would be unfavourable to the states as they would have to practically double their allocation. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The committee found that at even at 2009-10 sharing levels of 60:40 for the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan as many as 14 states defaulted on their shares. Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, Rajasthan, Chattisgarh, Himachal Pradesh, Orissa are among the defaulters. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >In the meantime, the cost of implementing the RTE had escalated to 2,31,000 crore from the initial estimate of 1,71,000 crore. This meant that in absolute terms, states would have to shoulder a bigger financial burden than previously estimated. A higher share for the centre was however opposed by the Planning Commission. The issue was resolved after HRD minister Kapil Sibal met with finance minister Pranab Mukherjee last weekend. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Expenditure Finance Committee approved the outlay of 2,31,000 crore as well. This includes the 24,000 crore allocated to the states by the thirteenth Finance Commission. This would make the total amount that the centre and states require to allocate for the implementation of the RTE is to the tune of 2,07,000 crore over the next five years. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The central government&rsquo;s share of this amount will be at 65% and that of the states 35%. However, when the 24,000 crore awarded by the Finance Commission is taken into account, the centre&rsquo;s share effectively works out to 68% while that of the states&rsquo; 32%.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 2635, 'title' => 'Centre, states to share RTE expenses in 68:32 ratio', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Underpressure from the states, the central government has agreed to bear a higher burden of the cost of implementing the Right to Education. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Centre&rsquo;s share of the financial burden will be at 68%, a sharp rise from the sharing pattern of 55:45 in the current year and the proposed 50:50 from 2011-12 . </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The new sharing pattern has been approved by the Expenditure Finance Committee on Wednesday. The ministry of human resource development had been pushing for a higher share, 75%, for the Centre as state after state expressed their inability to set aside higher level of funding required to meet the stringent norms of the RTE. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">States argued that the RTE made state and local bodies accountable for the implementation, even though neither has the financial capacity. Some states like Uttar Pradesh charged that since the central government takes all the credit for the legislation it should also ensure that funds are available. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Bordia Committee set up by the ministry in 2009-10 to harmonise the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan and the RTE also argued for a higher financial burden for the centre. It said that sharing ratio of 55:45 (for the current year) and 50:50 (in 2011-12 ) would be unfavourable to the states as they would have to practically double their allocation. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The committee found that at even at 2009-10 sharing levels of 60:40 for the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan as many as 14 states defaulted on their shares. Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, Rajasthan, Chattisgarh, Himachal Pradesh, Orissa are among the defaulters. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In the meantime, the cost of implementing the RTE had escalated to 2,31,000 crore from the initial estimate of 1,71,000 crore. This meant that in absolute terms, states would have to shoulder a bigger financial burden than previously estimated. A higher share for the centre was however opposed by the Planning Commission. The issue was resolved after HRD minister Kapil Sibal met with finance minister Pranab Mukherjee last weekend. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Expenditure Finance Committee approved the outlay of 2,31,000 crore as well. This includes the 24,000 crore allocated to the states by the thirteenth Finance Commission. This would make the total amount that the centre and states require to allocate for the implementation of the RTE is to the tune of 2,07,000 crore over the next five years. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The central government&rsquo;s share of this amount will be at 65% and that of the states 35%. However, when the 24,000 crore awarded by the Finance Commission is taken into account, the centre&rsquo;s share effectively works out to 68% while that of the states&rsquo; 32%.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 30 July, 2010, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/policy/Centre-states-to-share-RTE-expenses-in-6832-ratio/articleshow/6235330.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'centre-states-to-share-rte-expenses-in-6832-ratio-2720', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 2720, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 2635 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Centre, states to share RTE expenses in 68:32 ratio' $metaKeywords = null $metaDesc = ' Underpressure from the states, the central government has agreed to bear a higher burden of the cost of implementing the Right to Education. The Centre&rsquo;s share of the financial burden will be at 68%, a sharp rise from the sharing...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><font >Underpressure from the states, the central government has agreed to bear a higher burden of the cost of implementing the Right to Education. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Centre&rsquo;s share of the financial burden will be at 68%, a sharp rise from the sharing pattern of 55:45 in the current year and the proposed 50:50 from 2011-12 . </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The new sharing pattern has been approved by the Expenditure Finance Committee on Wednesday. The ministry of human resource development had been pushing for a higher share, 75%, for the Centre as state after state expressed their inability to set aside higher level of funding required to meet the stringent norms of the RTE. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >States argued that the RTE made state and local bodies accountable for the implementation, even though neither has the financial capacity. Some states like Uttar Pradesh charged that since the central government takes all the credit for the legislation it should also ensure that funds are available. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Bordia Committee set up by the ministry in 2009-10 to harmonise the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan and the RTE also argued for a higher financial burden for the centre. It said that sharing ratio of 55:45 (for the current year) and 50:50 (in 2011-12 ) would be unfavourable to the states as they would have to practically double their allocation. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The committee found that at even at 2009-10 sharing levels of 60:40 for the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan as many as 14 states defaulted on their shares. Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, Rajasthan, Chattisgarh, Himachal Pradesh, Orissa are among the defaulters. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >In the meantime, the cost of implementing the RTE had escalated to 2,31,000 crore from the initial estimate of 1,71,000 crore. This meant that in absolute terms, states would have to shoulder a bigger financial burden than previously estimated. A higher share for the centre was however opposed by the Planning Commission. The issue was resolved after HRD minister Kapil Sibal met with finance minister Pranab Mukherjee last weekend. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Expenditure Finance Committee approved the outlay of 2,31,000 crore as well. This includes the 24,000 crore allocated to the states by the thirteenth Finance Commission. This would make the total amount that the centre and states require to allocate for the implementation of the RTE is to the tune of 2,07,000 crore over the next five years. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The central government&rsquo;s share of this amount will be at 65% and that of the states 35%. However, when the 24,000 crore awarded by the Finance Commission is taken into account, the centre&rsquo;s share effectively works out to 68% while that of the states&rsquo; 32%.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/centre-states-to-share-rte-expenses-in-6832-ratio-2720.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Centre, states to share RTE expenses in 68:32 ratio | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" Underpressure from the states, the central government has agreed to bear a higher burden of the cost of implementing the Right to Education. The Centre’s share of the financial burden will be at 68%, a sharp rise from the sharing..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Centre, states to share RTE expenses in 68:32 ratio</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><font >Underpressure from the states, the central government has agreed to bear a higher burden of the cost of implementing the Right to Education. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Centre’s share of the financial burden will be at 68%, a sharp rise from the sharing pattern of 55:45 in the current year and the proposed 50:50 from 2011-12 . </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The new sharing pattern has been approved by the Expenditure Finance Committee on Wednesday. The ministry of human resource development had been pushing for a higher share, 75%, for the Centre as state after state expressed their inability to set aside higher level of funding required to meet the stringent norms of the RTE. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >States argued that the RTE made state and local bodies accountable for the implementation, even though neither has the financial capacity. Some states like Uttar Pradesh charged that since the central government takes all the credit for the legislation it should also ensure that funds are available. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Bordia Committee set up by the ministry in 2009-10 to harmonise the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan and the RTE also argued for a higher financial burden for the centre. It said that sharing ratio of 55:45 (for the current year) and 50:50 (in 2011-12 ) would be unfavourable to the states as they would have to practically double their allocation. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The committee found that at even at 2009-10 sharing levels of 60:40 for the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan as many as 14 states defaulted on their shares. Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, Rajasthan, Chattisgarh, Himachal Pradesh, Orissa are among the defaulters. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >In the meantime, the cost of implementing the RTE had escalated to 2,31,000 crore from the initial estimate of 1,71,000 crore. This meant that in absolute terms, states would have to shoulder a bigger financial burden than previously estimated. A higher share for the centre was however opposed by the Planning Commission. The issue was resolved after HRD minister Kapil Sibal met with finance minister Pranab Mukherjee last weekend. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Expenditure Finance Committee approved the outlay of 2,31,000 crore as well. This includes the 24,000 crore allocated to the states by the thirteenth Finance Commission. This would make the total amount that the centre and states require to allocate for the implementation of the RTE is to the tune of 2,07,000 crore over the next five years. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The central government’s share of this amount will be at 65% and that of the states 35%. However, when the 24,000 crore awarded by the Finance Commission is taken into account, the centre’s share effectively works out to 68% while that of the states’ 32%.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $reasonPhrase = 'OK'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitStatusLine() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 148 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 54 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/brlfuser/public_html/vendor/cakephp/cakephp/src/Error/Debugger.php:853) [CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181]Notice (8): Undefined variable: urlPrefix [APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8]Code Context$value
), $first);
$first = false;
$response = object(Cake\Http\Response) { 'status' => (int) 200, 'contentType' => 'text/html', 'headers' => [ 'Content-Type' => [ [maximum depth reached] ] ], 'file' => null, 'fileRange' => [], 'cookies' => object(Cake\Http\Cookie\CookieCollection) {}, 'cacheDirectives' => [], 'body' => '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <link rel="canonical" href="https://im4change.in/<pre class="cake-error"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68109c35cc273-trace').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68109c35cc273-trace').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none');"><b>Notice</b> (8)</a>: Undefined variable: urlPrefix [<b>APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp</b>, line <b>8</b>]<div id="cakeErr68109c35cc273-trace" class="cake-stack-trace" style="display: none;"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68109c35cc273-code').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68109c35cc273-code').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Code</a> <a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="document.getElementById('cakeErr68109c35cc273-context').style.display = (document.getElementById('cakeErr68109c35cc273-context').style.display == 'none' ? '' : 'none')">Context</a><pre id="cakeErr68109c35cc273-code" class="cake-code-dump" style="display: none;"><code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"></span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">head</span><span style="color: #007700">> </span></span></code> <span class="code-highlight"><code><span style="color: #000000"> <link rel="canonical" href="<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">Configure</span><span style="color: #007700">::</span><span style="color: #0000BB">read</span><span style="color: #007700">(</span><span style="color: #DD0000">'SITE_URL'</span><span style="color: #007700">); </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$urlPrefix</span><span style="color: #007700">;</span><span style="color: #0000BB">?><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">category</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">slug</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>/<span style="color: #0000BB"><?php </span><span style="color: #007700">echo </span><span style="color: #0000BB">$article_current</span><span style="color: #007700">-></span><span style="color: #0000BB">seo_url</span><span style="color: #007700">; </span><span style="color: #0000BB">?></span>.html"/> </span></code></span> <code><span style="color: #000000"><span style="color: #0000BB"> </span><span style="color: #007700"><</span><span style="color: #0000BB">meta http</span><span style="color: #007700">-</span><span style="color: #0000BB">equiv</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"Content-Type" </span><span style="color: #0000BB">content</span><span style="color: #007700">=</span><span style="color: #DD0000">"text/html; charset=utf-8"</span><span style="color: #007700">/> </span></span></code></pre><pre id="cakeErr68109c35cc273-context" class="cake-context" style="display: none;">$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 2635, 'title' => 'Centre, states to share RTE expenses in 68:32 ratio', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Underpressure from the states, the central government has agreed to bear a higher burden of the cost of implementing the Right to Education. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Centre&rsquo;s share of the financial burden will be at 68%, a sharp rise from the sharing pattern of 55:45 in the current year and the proposed 50:50 from 2011-12 . </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The new sharing pattern has been approved by the Expenditure Finance Committee on Wednesday. The ministry of human resource development had been pushing for a higher share, 75%, for the Centre as state after state expressed their inability to set aside higher level of funding required to meet the stringent norms of the RTE. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">States argued that the RTE made state and local bodies accountable for the implementation, even though neither has the financial capacity. Some states like Uttar Pradesh charged that since the central government takes all the credit for the legislation it should also ensure that funds are available. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Bordia Committee set up by the ministry in 2009-10 to harmonise the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan and the RTE also argued for a higher financial burden for the centre. It said that sharing ratio of 55:45 (for the current year) and 50:50 (in 2011-12 ) would be unfavourable to the states as they would have to practically double their allocation. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The committee found that at even at 2009-10 sharing levels of 60:40 for the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan as many as 14 states defaulted on their shares. Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, Rajasthan, Chattisgarh, Himachal Pradesh, Orissa are among the defaulters. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In the meantime, the cost of implementing the RTE had escalated to 2,31,000 crore from the initial estimate of 1,71,000 crore. This meant that in absolute terms, states would have to shoulder a bigger financial burden than previously estimated. A higher share for the centre was however opposed by the Planning Commission. The issue was resolved after HRD minister Kapil Sibal met with finance minister Pranab Mukherjee last weekend. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Expenditure Finance Committee approved the outlay of 2,31,000 crore as well. This includes the 24,000 crore allocated to the states by the thirteenth Finance Commission. This would make the total amount that the centre and states require to allocate for the implementation of the RTE is to the tune of 2,07,000 crore over the next five years. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The central government&rsquo;s share of this amount will be at 65% and that of the states 35%. However, when the 24,000 crore awarded by the Finance Commission is taken into account, the centre&rsquo;s share effectively works out to 68% while that of the states&rsquo; 32%.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 30 July, 2010, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/policy/Centre-states-to-share-RTE-expenses-in-6832-ratio/articleshow/6235330.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'centre-states-to-share-rte-expenses-in-6832-ratio-2720', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 2720, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [[maximum depth reached]], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 2635, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Centre, states to share RTE expenses in 68:32 ratio', 'metaKeywords' => null, 'metaDesc' => ' Underpressure from the states, the central government has agreed to bear a higher burden of the cost of implementing the Right to Education. The Centre&rsquo;s share of the financial burden will be at 68%, a sharp rise from the sharing...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><font >Underpressure from the states, the central government has agreed to bear a higher burden of the cost of implementing the Right to Education. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Centre&rsquo;s share of the financial burden will be at 68%, a sharp rise from the sharing pattern of 55:45 in the current year and the proposed 50:50 from 2011-12 . </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The new sharing pattern has been approved by the Expenditure Finance Committee on Wednesday. The ministry of human resource development had been pushing for a higher share, 75%, for the Centre as state after state expressed their inability to set aside higher level of funding required to meet the stringent norms of the RTE. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >States argued that the RTE made state and local bodies accountable for the implementation, even though neither has the financial capacity. Some states like Uttar Pradesh charged that since the central government takes all the credit for the legislation it should also ensure that funds are available. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Bordia Committee set up by the ministry in 2009-10 to harmonise the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan and the RTE also argued for a higher financial burden for the centre. It said that sharing ratio of 55:45 (for the current year) and 50:50 (in 2011-12 ) would be unfavourable to the states as they would have to practically double their allocation. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The committee found that at even at 2009-10 sharing levels of 60:40 for the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan as many as 14 states defaulted on their shares. Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, Rajasthan, Chattisgarh, Himachal Pradesh, Orissa are among the defaulters. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >In the meantime, the cost of implementing the RTE had escalated to 2,31,000 crore from the initial estimate of 1,71,000 crore. This meant that in absolute terms, states would have to shoulder a bigger financial burden than previously estimated. A higher share for the centre was however opposed by the Planning Commission. The issue was resolved after HRD minister Kapil Sibal met with finance minister Pranab Mukherjee last weekend. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Expenditure Finance Committee approved the outlay of 2,31,000 crore as well. This includes the 24,000 crore allocated to the states by the thirteenth Finance Commission. This would make the total amount that the centre and states require to allocate for the implementation of the RTE is to the tune of 2,07,000 crore over the next five years. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The central government&rsquo;s share of this amount will be at 65% and that of the states 35%. However, when the 24,000 crore awarded by the Finance Commission is taken into account, the centre&rsquo;s share effectively works out to 68% while that of the states&rsquo; 32%.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 2635, 'title' => 'Centre, states to share RTE expenses in 68:32 ratio', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Underpressure from the states, the central government has agreed to bear a higher burden of the cost of implementing the Right to Education. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Centre&rsquo;s share of the financial burden will be at 68%, a sharp rise from the sharing pattern of 55:45 in the current year and the proposed 50:50 from 2011-12 . </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The new sharing pattern has been approved by the Expenditure Finance Committee on Wednesday. The ministry of human resource development had been pushing for a higher share, 75%, for the Centre as state after state expressed their inability to set aside higher level of funding required to meet the stringent norms of the RTE. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">States argued that the RTE made state and local bodies accountable for the implementation, even though neither has the financial capacity. Some states like Uttar Pradesh charged that since the central government takes all the credit for the legislation it should also ensure that funds are available. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Bordia Committee set up by the ministry in 2009-10 to harmonise the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan and the RTE also argued for a higher financial burden for the centre. It said that sharing ratio of 55:45 (for the current year) and 50:50 (in 2011-12 ) would be unfavourable to the states as they would have to practically double their allocation. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The committee found that at even at 2009-10 sharing levels of 60:40 for the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan as many as 14 states defaulted on their shares. Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, Rajasthan, Chattisgarh, Himachal Pradesh, Orissa are among the defaulters. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In the meantime, the cost of implementing the RTE had escalated to 2,31,000 crore from the initial estimate of 1,71,000 crore. This meant that in absolute terms, states would have to shoulder a bigger financial burden than previously estimated. A higher share for the centre was however opposed by the Planning Commission. The issue was resolved after HRD minister Kapil Sibal met with finance minister Pranab Mukherjee last weekend. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Expenditure Finance Committee approved the outlay of 2,31,000 crore as well. This includes the 24,000 crore allocated to the states by the thirteenth Finance Commission. This would make the total amount that the centre and states require to allocate for the implementation of the RTE is to the tune of 2,07,000 crore over the next five years. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The central government&rsquo;s share of this amount will be at 65% and that of the states 35%. However, when the 24,000 crore awarded by the Finance Commission is taken into account, the centre&rsquo;s share effectively works out to 68% while that of the states&rsquo; 32%.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 30 July, 2010, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/policy/Centre-states-to-share-RTE-expenses-in-6832-ratio/articleshow/6235330.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'centre-states-to-share-rte-expenses-in-6832-ratio-2720', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 2720, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 2635 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Centre, states to share RTE expenses in 68:32 ratio' $metaKeywords = null $metaDesc = ' Underpressure from the states, the central government has agreed to bear a higher burden of the cost of implementing the Right to Education. The Centre&rsquo;s share of the financial burden will be at 68%, a sharp rise from the sharing...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><font >Underpressure from the states, the central government has agreed to bear a higher burden of the cost of implementing the Right to Education. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Centre&rsquo;s share of the financial burden will be at 68%, a sharp rise from the sharing pattern of 55:45 in the current year and the proposed 50:50 from 2011-12 . </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The new sharing pattern has been approved by the Expenditure Finance Committee on Wednesday. The ministry of human resource development had been pushing for a higher share, 75%, for the Centre as state after state expressed their inability to set aside higher level of funding required to meet the stringent norms of the RTE. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >States argued that the RTE made state and local bodies accountable for the implementation, even though neither has the financial capacity. Some states like Uttar Pradesh charged that since the central government takes all the credit for the legislation it should also ensure that funds are available. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Bordia Committee set up by the ministry in 2009-10 to harmonise the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan and the RTE also argued for a higher financial burden for the centre. It said that sharing ratio of 55:45 (for the current year) and 50:50 (in 2011-12 ) would be unfavourable to the states as they would have to practically double their allocation. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The committee found that at even at 2009-10 sharing levels of 60:40 for the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan as many as 14 states defaulted on their shares. Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, Rajasthan, Chattisgarh, Himachal Pradesh, Orissa are among the defaulters. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >In the meantime, the cost of implementing the RTE had escalated to 2,31,000 crore from the initial estimate of 1,71,000 crore. This meant that in absolute terms, states would have to shoulder a bigger financial burden than previously estimated. A higher share for the centre was however opposed by the Planning Commission. The issue was resolved after HRD minister Kapil Sibal met with finance minister Pranab Mukherjee last weekend. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Expenditure Finance Committee approved the outlay of 2,31,000 crore as well. This includes the 24,000 crore allocated to the states by the thirteenth Finance Commission. This would make the total amount that the centre and states require to allocate for the implementation of the RTE is to the tune of 2,07,000 crore over the next five years. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The central government&rsquo;s share of this amount will be at 65% and that of the states 35%. However, when the 24,000 crore awarded by the Finance Commission is taken into account, the centre&rsquo;s share effectively works out to 68% while that of the states&rsquo; 32%.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'</pre><pre class="stack-trace">include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51</pre></div></pre>latest-news-updates/centre-states-to-share-rte-expenses-in-6832-ratio-2720.html"/> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> <link href="https://im4change.in/css/control.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="all"/> <title>LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Centre, states to share RTE expenses in 68:32 ratio | Im4change.org</title> <meta name="description" content=" Underpressure from the states, the central government has agreed to bear a higher burden of the cost of implementing the Right to Education. The Centre’s share of the financial burden will be at 68%, a sharp rise from the sharing..."/> <script src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-1.10.2.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://im4change.in/js/jquery-migrate.min.js"></script> <script language="javascript" type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { var img = $("img")[0]; // Get my img elem var pic_real_width, pic_real_height; $("<img/>") // Make in memory copy of image to avoid css issues .attr("src", $(img).attr("src")) .load(function () { pic_real_width = this.width; // Note: $(this).width() will not pic_real_height = this.height; // work for in memory images. }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> @media screen { div.divFooter { display: block; } } @media print { .printbutton { display: none !important; } } </style> </head> <body> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="98%" align="center"> <tr> <td class="top_bg"> <div class="divFooter"> <img src="https://im4change.in/images/logo1.jpg" height="59" border="0" alt="Resource centre on India's rural distress" style="padding-top:14px;"/> </div> </td> </tr> <tr> <td id="topspace"> </td> </tr> <tr id="topspace"> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-bottom:1px solid #000; padding-top:10px;" class="printbutton"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%"> <h1 class="news_headlines" style="font-style:normal"> <strong>Centre, states to share RTE expenses in 68:32 ratio</strong></h1> </td> </tr> <tr> <td width="100%" style="font-family:Arial, 'Segoe Script', 'Segoe UI', sans-serif, serif"><font size="3"> <p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><font >Underpressure from the states, the central government has agreed to bear a higher burden of the cost of implementing the Right to Education. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Centre’s share of the financial burden will be at 68%, a sharp rise from the sharing pattern of 55:45 in the current year and the proposed 50:50 from 2011-12 . </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The new sharing pattern has been approved by the Expenditure Finance Committee on Wednesday. The ministry of human resource development had been pushing for a higher share, 75%, for the Centre as state after state expressed their inability to set aside higher level of funding required to meet the stringent norms of the RTE. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >States argued that the RTE made state and local bodies accountable for the implementation, even though neither has the financial capacity. Some states like Uttar Pradesh charged that since the central government takes all the credit for the legislation it should also ensure that funds are available. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Bordia Committee set up by the ministry in 2009-10 to harmonise the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan and the RTE also argued for a higher financial burden for the centre. It said that sharing ratio of 55:45 (for the current year) and 50:50 (in 2011-12 ) would be unfavourable to the states as they would have to practically double their allocation. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The committee found that at even at 2009-10 sharing levels of 60:40 for the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan as many as 14 states defaulted on their shares. Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, Rajasthan, Chattisgarh, Himachal Pradesh, Orissa are among the defaulters. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >In the meantime, the cost of implementing the RTE had escalated to 2,31,000 crore from the initial estimate of 1,71,000 crore. This meant that in absolute terms, states would have to shoulder a bigger financial burden than previously estimated. A higher share for the centre was however opposed by the Planning Commission. The issue was resolved after HRD minister Kapil Sibal met with finance minister Pranab Mukherjee last weekend. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Expenditure Finance Committee approved the outlay of 2,31,000 crore as well. This includes the 24,000 crore allocated to the states by the thirteenth Finance Commission. This would make the total amount that the centre and states require to allocate for the implementation of the RTE is to the tune of 2,07,000 crore over the next five years. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The central government’s share of this amount will be at 65% and that of the states 35%. However, when the 24,000 crore awarded by the Finance Commission is taken into account, the centre’s share effectively works out to 68% while that of the states’ 32%.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p> </font> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td height="50" style="border-top:1px solid #000; border-bottom:1px solid #000;padding-top:10px;"> <form><input type="button" value=" Print this page " onclick="window.print();return false;"/></form> </td> </tr> </table></body> </html>' } $cookies = [] $values = [ (int) 0 => 'text/html; charset=UTF-8' ] $name = 'Content-Type' $first = true $value = 'text/html; charset=UTF-8'header - [internal], line ?? Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emitHeaders() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 181 Cake\Http\ResponseEmitter::emit() - CORE/src/Http/ResponseEmitter.php, line 55 Cake\Http\Server::emit() - CORE/src/Http/Server.php, line 141 [main] - ROOT/webroot/index.php, line 39
<head>
<link rel="canonical" href="<?php echo Configure::read('SITE_URL'); ?><?php echo $urlPrefix;?><?php echo $article_current->category->slug; ?>/<?php echo $article_current->seo_url; ?>.html"/>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/>
$viewFile = '/home/brlfuser/public_html/src/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp' $dataForView = [ 'article_current' => object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 2635, 'title' => 'Centre, states to share RTE expenses in 68:32 ratio', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Underpressure from the states, the central government has agreed to bear a higher burden of the cost of implementing the Right to Education. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Centre’s share of the financial burden will be at 68%, a sharp rise from the sharing pattern of 55:45 in the current year and the proposed 50:50 from 2011-12 . </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The new sharing pattern has been approved by the Expenditure Finance Committee on Wednesday. The ministry of human resource development had been pushing for a higher share, 75%, for the Centre as state after state expressed their inability to set aside higher level of funding required to meet the stringent norms of the RTE. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">States argued that the RTE made state and local bodies accountable for the implementation, even though neither has the financial capacity. Some states like Uttar Pradesh charged that since the central government takes all the credit for the legislation it should also ensure that funds are available. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Bordia Committee set up by the ministry in 2009-10 to harmonise the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan and the RTE also argued for a higher financial burden for the centre. It said that sharing ratio of 55:45 (for the current year) and 50:50 (in 2011-12 ) would be unfavourable to the states as they would have to practically double their allocation. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The committee found that at even at 2009-10 sharing levels of 60:40 for the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan as many as 14 states defaulted on their shares. Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, Rajasthan, Chattisgarh, Himachal Pradesh, Orissa are among the defaulters. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In the meantime, the cost of implementing the RTE had escalated to 2,31,000 crore from the initial estimate of 1,71,000 crore. This meant that in absolute terms, states would have to shoulder a bigger financial burden than previously estimated. A higher share for the centre was however opposed by the Planning Commission. The issue was resolved after HRD minister Kapil Sibal met with finance minister Pranab Mukherjee last weekend. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Expenditure Finance Committee approved the outlay of 2,31,000 crore as well. This includes the 24,000 crore allocated to the states by the thirteenth Finance Commission. This would make the total amount that the centre and states require to allocate for the implementation of the RTE is to the tune of 2,07,000 crore over the next five years. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The central government’s share of this amount will be at 65% and that of the states 35%. However, when the 24,000 crore awarded by the Finance Commission is taken into account, the centre’s share effectively works out to 68% while that of the states’ 32%.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 30 July, 2010, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/policy/Centre-states-to-share-RTE-expenses-in-6832-ratio/articleshow/6235330.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'centre-states-to-share-rte-expenses-in-6832-ratio-2720', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 2720, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [[maximum depth reached]], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ [maximum depth reached] ], '[dirty]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[original]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[virtual]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[invalid]' => [[maximum depth reached]], '[repository]' => 'Articles' }, 'articleid' => (int) 2635, 'metaTitle' => 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Centre, states to share RTE expenses in 68:32 ratio', 'metaKeywords' => null, 'metaDesc' => ' Underpressure from the states, the central government has agreed to bear a higher burden of the cost of implementing the Right to Education. The Centre’s share of the financial burden will be at 68%, a sharp rise from the sharing...', 'disp' => '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><font >Underpressure from the states, the central government has agreed to bear a higher burden of the cost of implementing the Right to Education. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Centre’s share of the financial burden will be at 68%, a sharp rise from the sharing pattern of 55:45 in the current year and the proposed 50:50 from 2011-12 . </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The new sharing pattern has been approved by the Expenditure Finance Committee on Wednesday. The ministry of human resource development had been pushing for a higher share, 75%, for the Centre as state after state expressed their inability to set aside higher level of funding required to meet the stringent norms of the RTE. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >States argued that the RTE made state and local bodies accountable for the implementation, even though neither has the financial capacity. Some states like Uttar Pradesh charged that since the central government takes all the credit for the legislation it should also ensure that funds are available. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Bordia Committee set up by the ministry in 2009-10 to harmonise the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan and the RTE also argued for a higher financial burden for the centre. It said that sharing ratio of 55:45 (for the current year) and 50:50 (in 2011-12 ) would be unfavourable to the states as they would have to practically double their allocation. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The committee found that at even at 2009-10 sharing levels of 60:40 for the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan as many as 14 states defaulted on their shares. Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, Rajasthan, Chattisgarh, Himachal Pradesh, Orissa are among the defaulters. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >In the meantime, the cost of implementing the RTE had escalated to 2,31,000 crore from the initial estimate of 1,71,000 crore. This meant that in absolute terms, states would have to shoulder a bigger financial burden than previously estimated. A higher share for the centre was however opposed by the Planning Commission. The issue was resolved after HRD minister Kapil Sibal met with finance minister Pranab Mukherjee last weekend. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Expenditure Finance Committee approved the outlay of 2,31,000 crore as well. This includes the 24,000 crore allocated to the states by the thirteenth Finance Commission. This would make the total amount that the centre and states require to allocate for the implementation of the RTE is to the tune of 2,07,000 crore over the next five years. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The central government’s share of this amount will be at 65% and that of the states 35%. However, when the 24,000 crore awarded by the Finance Commission is taken into account, the centre’s share effectively works out to 68% while that of the states’ 32%.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>', 'lang' => 'English', 'SITE_URL' => 'https://im4change.in/', 'site_title' => 'im4change', 'adminprix' => 'admin' ] $article_current = object(App\Model\Entity\Article) { 'id' => (int) 2635, 'title' => 'Centre, states to share RTE expenses in 68:32 ratio', 'subheading' => '', 'description' => '<p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">Underpressure from the states, the central government has agreed to bear a higher burden of the cost of implementing the Right to Education. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Centre’s share of the financial burden will be at 68%, a sharp rise from the sharing pattern of 55:45 in the current year and the proposed 50:50 from 2011-12 . </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The new sharing pattern has been approved by the Expenditure Finance Committee on Wednesday. The ministry of human resource development had been pushing for a higher share, 75%, for the Centre as state after state expressed their inability to set aside higher level of funding required to meet the stringent norms of the RTE. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">States argued that the RTE made state and local bodies accountable for the implementation, even though neither has the financial capacity. Some states like Uttar Pradesh charged that since the central government takes all the credit for the legislation it should also ensure that funds are available. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Bordia Committee set up by the ministry in 2009-10 to harmonise the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan and the RTE also argued for a higher financial burden for the centre. It said that sharing ratio of 55:45 (for the current year) and 50:50 (in 2011-12 ) would be unfavourable to the states as they would have to practically double their allocation. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The committee found that at even at 2009-10 sharing levels of 60:40 for the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan as many as 14 states defaulted on their shares. Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, Rajasthan, Chattisgarh, Himachal Pradesh, Orissa are among the defaulters. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">In the meantime, the cost of implementing the RTE had escalated to 2,31,000 crore from the initial estimate of 1,71,000 crore. This meant that in absolute terms, states would have to shoulder a bigger financial burden than previously estimated. A higher share for the centre was however opposed by the Planning Commission. The issue was resolved after HRD minister Kapil Sibal met with finance minister Pranab Mukherjee last weekend. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The Expenditure Finance Committee approved the outlay of 2,31,000 crore as well. This includes the 24,000 crore allocated to the states by the thirteenth Finance Commission. This would make the total amount that the centre and states require to allocate for the implementation of the RTE is to the tune of 2,07,000 crore over the next five years. </font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3">The central government’s share of this amount will be at 65% and that of the states 35%. However, when the 24,000 crore awarded by the Finance Commission is taken into account, the centre’s share effectively works out to 68% while that of the states’ 32%.</font> </p> <p align="justify"> <font face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="3"></font> </p> ', 'credit_writer' => 'The Economic Times, 30 July, 2010, http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/policy/Centre-states-to-share-RTE-expenses-in-6832-ratio/articleshow/6235330.cms', 'article_img' => '', 'article_img_thumb' => '', 'status' => (int) 1, 'show_on_home' => (int) 1, 'lang' => 'EN', 'category_id' => (int) 16, 'tag_keyword' => '', 'seo_url' => 'centre-states-to-share-rte-expenses-in-6832-ratio-2720', 'meta_title' => null, 'meta_keywords' => null, 'meta_description' => null, 'noindex' => (int) 0, 'publish_date' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenDate) {}, 'most_visit_section_id' => null, 'article_big_img' => null, 'liveid' => (int) 2720, 'created' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'modified' => object(Cake\I18n\FrozenTime) {}, 'edate' => '', 'tags' => [], 'category' => object(App\Model\Entity\Category) {}, '[new]' => false, '[accessible]' => [ '*' => true, 'id' => false ], '[dirty]' => [], '[original]' => [], '[virtual]' => [], '[hasErrors]' => false, '[errors]' => [], '[invalid]' => [], '[repository]' => 'Articles' } $articleid = (int) 2635 $metaTitle = 'LATEST NEWS UPDATES | Centre, states to share RTE expenses in 68:32 ratio' $metaKeywords = null $metaDesc = ' Underpressure from the states, the central government has agreed to bear a higher burden of the cost of implementing the Right to Education. The Centre’s share of the financial burden will be at 68%, a sharp rise from the sharing...' $disp = '<p align="justify"><font ></font></p><p align="justify"><font >Underpressure from the states, the central government has agreed to bear a higher burden of the cost of implementing the Right to Education. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Centre’s share of the financial burden will be at 68%, a sharp rise from the sharing pattern of 55:45 in the current year and the proposed 50:50 from 2011-12 . </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The new sharing pattern has been approved by the Expenditure Finance Committee on Wednesday. The ministry of human resource development had been pushing for a higher share, 75%, for the Centre as state after state expressed their inability to set aside higher level of funding required to meet the stringent norms of the RTE. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >States argued that the RTE made state and local bodies accountable for the implementation, even though neither has the financial capacity. Some states like Uttar Pradesh charged that since the central government takes all the credit for the legislation it should also ensure that funds are available. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Bordia Committee set up by the ministry in 2009-10 to harmonise the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan and the RTE also argued for a higher financial burden for the centre. It said that sharing ratio of 55:45 (for the current year) and 50:50 (in 2011-12 ) would be unfavourable to the states as they would have to practically double their allocation. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The committee found that at even at 2009-10 sharing levels of 60:40 for the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan as many as 14 states defaulted on their shares. Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, Rajasthan, Chattisgarh, Himachal Pradesh, Orissa are among the defaulters. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >In the meantime, the cost of implementing the RTE had escalated to 2,31,000 crore from the initial estimate of 1,71,000 crore. This meant that in absolute terms, states would have to shoulder a bigger financial burden than previously estimated. A higher share for the centre was however opposed by the Planning Commission. The issue was resolved after HRD minister Kapil Sibal met with finance minister Pranab Mukherjee last weekend. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The Expenditure Finance Committee approved the outlay of 2,31,000 crore as well. This includes the 24,000 crore allocated to the states by the thirteenth Finance Commission. This would make the total amount that the centre and states require to allocate for the implementation of the RTE is to the tune of 2,07,000 crore over the next five years. </font></p><p align="justify"><font >The central government’s share of this amount will be at 65% and that of the states 35%. However, when the 24,000 crore awarded by the Finance Commission is taken into account, the centre’s share effectively works out to 68% while that of the states’ 32%.</font></p><p align="justify"><font ></font></p>' $lang = 'English' $SITE_URL = 'https://im4change.in/' $site_title = 'im4change' $adminprix = 'admin'
include - APP/Template/Layout/printlayout.ctp, line 8 Cake\View\View::_evaluate() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1413 Cake\View\View::_render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 1374 Cake\View\View::renderLayout() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 927 Cake\View\View::render() - CORE/src/View/View.php, line 885 Cake\Controller\Controller::render() - CORE/src/Controller/Controller.php, line 791 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 126 Cake\Http\ActionDispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/src/Http/ActionDispatcher.php, line 94 Cake\Http\BaseApplication::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/BaseApplication.php, line 235 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\RoutingMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/RoutingMiddleware.php, line 162 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Routing\Middleware\AssetMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Routing/Middleware/AssetMiddleware.php, line 88 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Error\Middleware\ErrorHandlerMiddleware::__invoke() - CORE/src/Error/Middleware/ErrorHandlerMiddleware.php, line 96 Cake\Http\Runner::__invoke() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 65 Cake\Http\Runner::run() - CORE/src/Http/Runner.php, line 51
![]() |
Centre, states to share RTE expenses in 68:32 ratio |
Underpressure from the states, the central government has agreed to bear a higher burden of the cost of implementing the Right to Education. The Centre’s share of the financial burden will be at 68%, a sharp rise from the sharing pattern of 55:45 in the current year and the proposed 50:50 from 2011-12 . The new sharing pattern has been approved by the Expenditure Finance Committee on Wednesday. The ministry of human resource development had been pushing for a higher share, 75%, for the Centre as state after state expressed their inability to set aside higher level of funding required to meet the stringent norms of the RTE. States argued that the RTE made state and local bodies accountable for the implementation, even though neither has the financial capacity. Some states like Uttar Pradesh charged that since the central government takes all the credit for the legislation it should also ensure that funds are available. The Bordia Committee set up by the ministry in 2009-10 to harmonise the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan and the RTE also argued for a higher financial burden for the centre. It said that sharing ratio of 55:45 (for the current year) and 50:50 (in 2011-12 ) would be unfavourable to the states as they would have to practically double their allocation. The committee found that at even at 2009-10 sharing levels of 60:40 for the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan as many as 14 states defaulted on their shares. Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, Rajasthan, Chattisgarh, Himachal Pradesh, Orissa are among the defaulters. In the meantime, the cost of implementing the RTE had escalated to 2,31,000 crore from the initial estimate of 1,71,000 crore. This meant that in absolute terms, states would have to shoulder a bigger financial burden than previously estimated. A higher share for the centre was however opposed by the Planning Commission. The issue was resolved after HRD minister Kapil Sibal met with finance minister Pranab Mukherjee last weekend. The Expenditure Finance Committee approved the outlay of 2,31,000 crore as well. This includes the 24,000 crore allocated to the states by the thirteenth Finance Commission. This would make the total amount that the centre and states require to allocate for the implementation of the RTE is to the tune of 2,07,000 crore over the next five years. The central government’s share of this amount will be at 65% and that of the states 35%. However, when the 24,000 crore awarded by the Finance Commission is taken into account, the centre’s share effectively works out to 68% while that of the states’ 32%. |